Management Reports • Mar 3, 2017
Management Reports
Open in ViewerOpens in native device viewer

February 2017
The comparability of Luka Koper d. d. reported financial indicators with foreign competitors is subject to the following:
| Luka Koper, d. d. | |
|---|---|
| general cargoes | 1,475,076 TONS |
| containers | 790,736 TEU |
| vehicles | 607,326 VEHICLES |
| liquid cargoes | 3,297,225 TONS |
| dry bulk cargoes | 7,295,426 TONS |
| passengers | 57,893 PERSONS |
o Luka Koper, d. d., throughput in 2015:
The Benchmarking Report compares the indicators of LUKA KOPER, D. D., with those of the following companies:
| EUROKAI | |
|---|---|
| containers | 14,549,644 TEU |
o It is part of the EUROKAI Group and a container terminal in Italy.
| o | Medcenter Container Terminal SPA, Gioia Tauro, throughput in 2015: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medcenter | Container | Terminal | ||
| SPA, Gioia Tauro | ||||
| containers | 2,547,000 TEU |
o It is one of the leading port logistics holdings in Europe. It controls three segments: container transports, logistics and intermodality. HHLA operates three high-efficiency container terminals – Altenwerder, Burchardkai and Tollerort – which ensure Hamburg's position of a superior logistics centre.
| HHLA | |
|---|---|
| containers | 6,561,000 TEU |
o T.O. Delta SPA throughput in 2015:
| Trieste Marine Terminal SPA | |
|---|---|
| containers | 443,882 TEU |
| Compagnia Portuale Monfalcone | |
| general cargoes | 1,360,000 TONS |
| bulk cargoes | 3,090,000 TONS |
| vehicles | 124,000 VEHICLES |
| Trieste Marine Terminal SPA | |
|---|---|
| containers | 443,882 TEU |
| AUTO TERMINAL SA | |
|---|---|
| vehicles | 881,893 VEHICLES |
o Noatum Container Terminal Valencia SA throughput in 2015:
| Noatum | |
|---|---|
| containers | 4,300,000 TEU |
| vehicles | 1,175,000 VEHICLES |
| other goods | 14,000,000 TONS |
| Noatum Container Terminal |
|
| Valencia SA | |
| containers | 2,116,164 TEU |
| Luka Ploče, d. d. | |
|---|---|
| general cargoes | 503,029 TONS |
| bulk cargoes | 1,863,114 TONS |
| liquid cargoes | 464,509 TONS |
| containers | 20,676 TEU |
| Luka Rijeka, d. d. | |
|---|---|
| general cargoes | 631,687 TONS |
| bulk cargoes | 1,772,503 TONS |
| passengers | 153,304 PERSONS |
| Jadranska Vrata, d. d., Brajdica | |
| containers | 200,102 TEU |
| Janaf, d. d. | |
| liquid cargoes | 6,595,537 TONS |
| Exportdrvo, d. d. | |
| timber | 381,990 TONS |
| Piraeus Port Authority S.A. | |
|---|---|
| containers | 293,353 TEU |
| vehicles | 341,386 VEHICLES |
| passengers | 15,809,524 PERSONS |
| Piraeus Container Terminal S.A. (COSCO) | |
| containers | 3,034,400 TEU |
For companies Luka Ploče, d. d., and Luka Rijeka, d. d., amounts were expressed in HRK and converted to EUR at the exchange rate as at 31 December of each year.
Between 2010 and 2014 maritime throughput of containers in TEU increased on average for the compared companies, whereas in 2015 it witnessed a year-on-year decrease. The maritime throughput of containers by Luka Koper, d. d., was up 17% in 2015 compared to 2014. The highest year-on-year growth rate in 2015, of 23%, was reported by Luka Ploče, d. d.; however, its throughput is the lowest among all compared companies. The largest year-on-year decline in maritime throughput of containers in 2015 was witnessed by Piraeus Port Authority S.A. Pier I.


The EBITDA margin is an indicator facilitating competitive benchmarking. In the period 2010– 2015, the highest EBITDA margin had been reported by Luka Koper, d. d., which preserved its leading position among the analysed peers in 2015, when its EBITDA margin was 37.6%. As to the other companies, the indicator's value deviates the most in case of Auto Terminal SA and Noatum Container Terminal Valencia SA – in both cases for 2013 and due to other extraordinary expenditure, which totalled EUR 5.8 million and EUR 15.1 million, respectively – and in case of Medcenter Container Terminal SA and Luka Ploče, d. d. – in both cases due to lower net sales revenues in 2011 and 2012, respectively.

Luka Koper, d. d., RETURN ON EQUITY (ROE) in the past years was under the impact of different impairments. Similarly, the other companies – with the exception of EUROKAI, HHLA and the Greek port – also faced instable operations in this period. The highest EBITDA margin in 2015, of 17.3%, was reported by the Spain-based Auto Terminal SA. After five years of losses, they reported a net profit for 2015. Their high ROE value is due to several years of having operated with a loss and the consequent decrease in the value of equity. The ROE of Luka Koper, d. d., in 2015 was 10.5%. The only company that reported a better ROE for 2015 than Luka Koper, d. d., was HHLA. As to the other companies, the indicator's value deviates the most in case of Trieste Marine Terminal SPA for 2010 due to net loss totalling EUR 2.8 million.

The comparability of the productivity indicator reported by Luka Koper, d. d., with those of foreign competitors may be subject to different models of port services, namely whether services are provided with employees or contractors. Information on what model of port services the other companies use, is not known.
The lowest shares of labour costs in value added in the period 2010–2015 were reported by Noatum Container Terminal Valencia SA1 and Luka Koper, d. d. In 2015, the lowest share was maintained by Noatum Container Terminal Valencia SA on 36%, immediately followed by Luka Koper, d. d., on the second lowest share of 38%. The highest share of labour costs in value added among analysed peers in 2015 was 101%, reported by T.O. Delta SPA. As to the other companies, the indicator's value deviates the most for Auto Terminal SA – it witnessed a loss of EUR 7.5 million from operations in 2013, which resulted in negative value added of EUR 2.4 million – and for Luka Ploče, d. d., which reported a loss of EUR 3 million in 2012, also pushing value added down.

1 The higher share of labour costs in value added in 2013 in case of Noatum Container Terminal Valencia (56%) was attributable to other extraordinary expenditure in the amount of EUR 15.1 million.
Disclaimer:
Information in this document was obtained from sources the author considers credible; however no assurances are being made as to their accuracy and completeness.
Information herein does not constitute inside information under Article 373 of the Slovene Markets in Financial Instruments Act. The Summary Competitive Benchmarking Report 2010–2015 compares Luka Koper, d. d., with other port operators on the basis of the gathered information. Benchmarking was based on the best available expertise and experience of Luka Koper, d. d., its objective being as credible as possible a comparison of the operating results of Luka Koper, d. d., with the operating results of other port operators.
Building tools?
Free accounts include 100 API calls/year for testing.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.