Annual Report • Apr 9, 2010
Annual Report
Open in ViewerOpens in native device viewer
Separate financial statements for 2009
| Company details | 1 |
|---|---|
| Management"s statement on the financial statements | 2 |
| Independent auditor"s report to the shareholders of AB Vilkyškių Pieninė |
3 |
| Separate statement of financial position | 5 |
| Separate income statement | 6 |
| Separate statement of comprehensive income | 7 |
| Separate statement of changes in equity | 8 |
| Separate statement of cash flows | 9 |
| Notes to the financial statements | 11 |
| Annual report fot the year 2009 | 53 |
Telephone: +370 441 55330 Telefax: +370 441 55242 Company code: 277160980 Registered office: LT-99369 Vilkyškiai, Vilkyškių sen., Pagėgių r. sav., Lithuania
Gintaras Bertašius (Chairman) Sigitas Trijonis Rimantas Jancevičius Vilija Milaševičiutė Andrej Cyba Linas Strėlis
Gintaras Bertašius, General Director Sigitas Trijonis, Technical Director Rimantas Jancevičius, Stock Director Arvydas Zaranka, Production Director Arminas Lunia, Sales Director Vilija Milaševičiutė, Finance Director
KPMG Baltics, UAB
AB SEB Bankas AB Bankas Snoras AB Bankas Swedbank
For the year ended 31 December 2009
| Thousand Litas | Note | 2009 | 2008 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Assets | |||
| Property, plant and equipment | 8 | 40,770 | 43,809 |
| Intangible assets | 9 | 608 | 299 |
| Investment in subsidiaries | 10 | 31,934 | 31,443 |
| Long-term receivables | 11 | 1,410 | 1,702 |
| Total non-current assets | 74,722 | 77,253 | |
| Inventories | 12 | 13,591 | 14,942 |
| Trade and other receivables | 13 | 13,354 | 15,967 |
| Prepaid income tax | - | 1,117 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 14 | 377 | 36 |
| Total current assets | 27,322 | 32,062 | |
| Total assets | 102,044 | 109,315 | |
| Equity | |||
| Share capital | 11,943 | 11,943 | |
| Share premium | 11,396 | 11,396 | |
| Reserves | 8,620 | 8,520 | |
| Retained earnings | 6,720 | 2,177 | |
| Total equity | 15 | 38,679 | 34,036 |
| Liabilities | |||
| Interest-bearing loans and leasing | |||
| liabilities | 16 | 26,329 | 35,690 |
| Capital grants | 17 | 3,071 | 3,339 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 18 | 2,301 | 1,591 |
| Total non-current liabilities | 31,701 | 40,620 | |
| Interest-bearing loans and leasing | |||
| liabilities | 16 | 14,557 | 15,136 |
| Trade and other payable amounts, including derivatives |
19 | 17,107 | 19,523 |
| Total current liabilities | 31,664 | 34,659 | |
| Total liabilities | 63,365 | 75,279 | |
| Total equity and liabilities | 102,044 | 109,315 |
For the year ended 31 December 2009
| Thousand Litas | Note | 2009 | 2008 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 1 | 145,744 | 145,405 |
| Cost of sales | 2 | -132,259 | -145,608 |
| Gross profit (loss) | 13,485 | -203 | |
| Other operating income, net | 309 | 240 | |
| Distribution expenses | 3 | -2,677 | -2,077 |
| Administrative expenses | 4 | -3,507 | -6,314 |
| Operating result | 7,610 | -8,354 | |
| Finance income | 50 | 97 | |
| Finance costs | -2,307 | -2,924 | |
| Net finance costs | 5 | -2,257 | -2,827 |
| Profit (loss) before tax | 5,353 | -11,181 | |
| Income tax expense | 6 | -1,249 | 1,444 |
| Net profit (loss) for the year | 4,104 | -9,737 | |
| Basic earnings per share (Litas) | 7 | 0.34 | -0.86 |
| Diluted earnings per share (Litas) | 7 | 0.34 | -0.86 |
| For the year ended 31 December 2009 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Thousand Litas | Note | 2009 | 2008 |
| Net profit (loss) | 4,104 | -9,737 | |
| Other comprehensive income for the year | |||
| Increase (decrease) of revaluation reserve | - | - | |
| Effect of income tax | 539 | -409 | |
| Other comprehensive income for the | |||
| year, net of income tax | 539 | -409 | |
| Total comprehensive income | 4,643 | -10,146 | |
Revalua
Thousand Litas
| Note | Share capital |
Share premium |
tion reserve |
Legal reserve |
Retained earnings |
Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance at 1 December 2008 |
9,353 | -- | 8,417 | 935 | 13,521 | 32,226 | |
| Loss for the year | - | - | - | - | -9,737 | -9,737 | |
| Other comprehensive income Decrease of revaluation reserve, net of income tax |
15 | - | - | -409 | - | - | -409 |
| Depreciation of revaluated assets | - | - | -423 | - | 423 | - | |
| Total other comprehensive income | - | - | -832 | - | 423 | -409 | |
| Contributions by and distributions to owners |
|||||||
| Dividends | - | - | - | - | -2,030 | -2,030 | |
| Issue of shares | 2,590 | 11,396 | - | - | - | 13,986 | |
| Total contributions by and distributions to owners |
2,590 | 11,396 | - | - | -2,030 | 11,956 | |
| Balance at 31 December 2008 | 11,943 | 11,396 | 7,585 | 935 | 2,177 | 34,036 | |
| Balance at 1 January 2009 | 11,943 | 11,396 | 7,585 | 935 | 2,177 | 34,036 | |
| Profit for the period | - | - | - | - | 4,104 | 4,104 | |
| Other comprehensive income | - | - | |||||
| Increase of revaluation reserve Depreciation of revaluated assets |
15 | - - |
- - |
539 -439 |
- - |
- 439 |
539 - |
| Total other comprehensive income | - | - | 100 | - | 439 | 539 | |
| Total contributions by and distributions to owners |
- | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Balance at 31 December 2009 | 11,943 | 11,396 | 7,685 | 935 | 6,720 | 38,679 |
For the year ended 31 December 2009
| Thousand Litas | Note | 2009 | 2008 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash flows from operating activities | |||
| Net profit (loss) | 4,104 | -9,737 | |
| Adjustments: | |||
| Depreciation of property, plant and equipment | 8 | 4,307 | 4,396 |
| Amortisation of intangible assets | 9 | 141 | 25 |
| Amortisation of grants | 17 | -268 | -269 |
| (Profit) loss of disposal of property, plant and | |||
| equipment | 120 | -94 | |
| Income tax expense | 6 | 1,249 | -1,444 |
| Interest expenses, net | 2,068 | 2,827 | |
| 11,721 | -4,296 | ||
| Change in inventories | 1,351 | 1,414 | |
| Change in long-term receivables | -197 | -283 | |
| Change in trade and other receivables | 3,730 | -3,804 | |
| Change in trade and other payables | -2,416 | 8,620 | |
| 14,189 | 1,651 | ||
| Paid interest | -2,068 | -2,851 | |
| Paid income tax | 11533- | -2,292 | |
| Net cash flows from (used in) operating | |||
| activities | 12,121 | -3,492 | |
| Cash flows from investing activities | |||
| Interest received | - | 72 | |
| Proceeds on sale of property, plant and | |||
| equipment | 57 | 331 | |
| Acquisition of subsidiary, net of cash acquired | -2 | -30,062 | |
| Acquisition of property, plant and equipment | -1,445 | -5,765 | |
| Acquisition of intangible assets | -450 | -282 | |
| Net cash flow used in investing activities | -1,840 | -35,706 |
For the year ended 31 December 2009
| Thousand Litas | Note | 2009 | 2008 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash flows from financing activities | |||
| Loans received | 350 | 36,881 | |
| Repayment of borrowings | -10,290 | -10,625 | |
| Proceeds from issue of share capital | - | 13,986 | |
| Dividends paid | - | -2,030 | |
| Net cash from (used in) financing activities | -9,940 | 38,212 | |
| Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
341 | -986 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents at 1 January | 3636 | 1,022 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents at 31 December | 14 | 377 | 36 |
AB Vilkyškių Pieninė (hereinafter – the Company) was established in 1993. The Company does not have any branches or representative offices.
AB Vilkyškių Pieninė is listed on the Vilnius Stock Exchange. The Company"s shares are owned by the following shareholders as at 31 December 2009:
| Shareholder | Shares | Nominal value, in Litas |
Total value, in Litas |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gintaras Bertašius | 6,016,506 | 1 | 6,016,506 |
| SEB clients | 2,483,577 | 1 | 2,483,577 |
| UAB FMĮ Orion Securities clients | 1,747,644 | 1 | 1,747,644 |
| Linas Strėlis | 1,015,000 | 1 | 1,015,000 |
| Other | 680,273 | 1 | 680,273 |
| Total capital | 11,943,000 | 1 | 11,943,000 |
The Company is engaged in production and sales of different types of cheese. Also, the Company produces and sells whey, raw milk, cream and butter.
Operations are carried out in the main production facilities, located in Vilkyškiai, Pagėgiai region. The Company also has a milk purchase and processing centre in Erţvilkas, Jurbarkas region.
As at 31 December 2009 the Company had 430 employees (2008 : 427).
The Company has a subsidiary AB Modest, which is engaged in milk processing and production of dairy products. The Company holds 97,2% voting rights of the subsidiary. AB Modest specialises in production of cheese, cottage cheese and other cheese products.
In 2008 the Company acquired one more subsidiary - AB Kelmės Pieninė, which is engaged in milk processing and production of dairy products. The Company holds 99% voting rights of AB Kelmės Pieninė. AB Kelmės Pieninė specialises in production of fresh dairy products.
These are the separate financial statements (financial statements) of AB Vilkyškių Pieninė, which have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as endorsed by the European Union.
The management of the Company is authorised to issue the separate financial statements of the Company after they are approved by the general shareholders meeting, which must be convened by 1 May 2010 as prescribed by the Companies Law of the Republic of Lithuania.
The financial statements are presented in thousands Litas (tLTL). Litas (LTL) is the legal currency of Lithuania and considered to be the functional currency of the Company. Financial statements are prepared on the historical cost basis except for:
Accounting records are maintained in accordance with Lithuanian laws and regulations.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRS, as adopted by the EU, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the application of policies and reported amounts of assets and liabilities, income and expenses. The estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis of making the judgments about carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimate is revised if the revision affects only that period or in the period of the revision and future periods if the revision affects both current and future periods.
The accounting policies of the Company, set out below, have been applied consistently to all periods presented in these financial statements, except for those which changed due to the changes in previously valid IFRS and the new IFRSs effective as of 1 January 2009.
Transactions in foreign currencies are translated into Litas at the foreign currency exchange rate ruling at the date of the transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at the statement of financial position date are translated into Litas at the exchange rate ruling at that date. All transactions made in EURO have been converted in Litas at 1 Euro=3.4528 Litas as fixed by the Central Bank of Lithuania.
Foreign currency exchange differences arising on translation are recognised in the income statement. Non-monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies that are stated at fair value are translated into Litas at foreign exchange rates ruling at the dates the values were determined.
Items of property, plant and equipment, including assets under finance lease terms, are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. The cost of self-constructed assets includes the cost of materials, direct labour costs and an appropriate proportion of production overheads.
When parts of an item of property, plant and equipment have different useful lives, they are accounted for for a separate items of property, plant and equipment.
The Company recognizes in the carrying amount of an item of tangible non-current assets the cost of replacing part of such an item when that cost is incurred if it is probable that the future economic benefits embodied with the item will flow to the Company and the costs of the item can be measured reliably. All other costs are recognized in the income statement as an expense as incurred.
Buildings are recorded at revaluated amounts, being its fair value at the date of the revaluation less any subsequent accumulated depreciation and subsequent accumulated impairment losses. Revaluations are made with sufficient regularity such that the carrying amount does not differ materially from that which is determined using fair value at the statement of financial position date. The fair value of the buildings is determined by appraisals undertaken by certified independent appraisers. The depreciation of buildings is calculated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful economic lives of assets. The revaluation reserve for buildings is being reduced in conformity with depreciation of certain assets.
In the case of revaluation, when the estimated fair value of an asset is lower than its carrying amount, the carrying amount of this asset is immediately reduced to the amount of fair value and such impairment is recognised as an expense. However, such impairment is deducted from the amount of increase of the previous revaluation of this asset accounted for in the revaluation reserve, to the extent it does not exceed the amount of such increase.
In the case of revaluation, when the estimated fair value of an asset is higher than its carrying amount, the carrying amount of this asset is increased to the amount of fair value and such increase is recorded in the revaluation reserve of property, plant and equipment under the capital caption. However such an increase in value is recognised as income to the extent it does not exceed the decrease of previous revaluation recorded under capital. Depreciation is calculated on the amount which is equal to the acquisition cost net of residual value of the asset.
The cost of replacing part of an item of property or equipment is recognised in the carrying amount of the item if it is probable that the future economic benefits embodied within the part will flow to the Company and its cost can be measured reliably. The costs of the day-today servicing of property and equipment are recognised in profit or loss as incurred. Borrowing costs are recognised in the income statement.
Depreciation is recognised in profit and loss on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of each part of an item of property, plant and equipment, since this most closely reflects the expected pattern of consumption of the future economic benefits embodied in the asset.
The estimated useful lives are as follows.:
| Land and buildings | 10-40 years |
|---|---|
| Machinery and equipment | 5-15 years |
| Other non-current assets | 3-7 years |
The useful lives, residual values and depreciation method are reviewed annually to ensure that the period of depreciation and other estimates are consistent with the expected pattern of economic benefits from items in property, plant and equipment.
Leases under the terms of which the Company assumes substantially all the risks and rewards of the ownership are classified as finance leases. The owner-occupied property acquired by way of finance lease is stated at the present value of the minimum lease payments at inception of the lease less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses.
Intangible assets that are acquired by the company are stated at cost less accumulated amortization and impairment losses. Amortization is charged to the income statement on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of 3 years.
Investment in subsidiaries is measured at cost less impairment losses, if any.
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less the estimated costs of completion and selling expenses.
The cost of inventories is based on the first-in first-out principle and includes expenditure incurred in acquiring the inventories and bringing them to their existing location and condition. In the case of manufactured inventories and work in progress, cost includes an appropriate share of overheads based on normal operating capacity.
According to IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement financial assets are classified as either financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, held-to-maturity financial assets, loans and receivables, and available-for-sale financial assets, as appropriate. All purchases and sales of financial assets are recognised on the trade date, except loans, receivables and deposits which are recognised at the date they are originated. When financial assets are recognised initially, they are measured at fair value, plus, in the case of investments not at fair value through profit or loss, directly attributable transaction costs.
Financial assets and financial liabilities classified in this category are designated by management on initial recognition when the following criteria are met:
Financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss are recorded in the balance sheet at fair value. Related profit or loss on revaluation is charged directly to the income statement. Interest income and expense and dividends on such investments are recognised as interest income and dividend income or interest expenses, respectively.
Non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments and fixed maturity are classified as held-to-maturity when the Company has the positive intention and ability to hold to maturity. Investments that are intended to be held-to-maturity are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method less any impairment losses. Gains and losses are recognised in the income statement when the investments are derecognised or impaired.
Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. Such assets are carried at amortised cost using the effective interest method less any impairment losses. Gains and losses are recognised in income when the loans and receivables are derecognised or impaired.
Available-for-sale financial assets are those non-derivative financial assets that are designated as available-for-sale or are not classified in any of the three preceding categories. After initial recognition available-for-sale financial assets are measured at fair value with gains or losses, except impairment losses, being recognised as a separate component of equity until the investment is derecognised at which time the cumulative gain or loss previously reported in equity is included in the income statement.
The fair value of investments that are actively traded in organised financial markets is determined by reference to quoted market bid prices at the close of business on the statements of financial position date. For investments where there is no active market, fair value is determined using valuation techniques. Such techniques include using recent arm's length market transactions; reference to the current market value of another instrument, which is substantially the same; discounted cash flow analysis or other valuation models.
Interest-bearing borrowings are recognised initially at cost, less attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition, interest-bearing borrowings are stated at amortised cost with any difference between cost and redemption value being recognised in the income statement over the period of the borrowings using the effective interest rate method.
Borrowing costs on loans used for acquisition of property, plant and equipment are recognised as part of the asset acquisition costs and are accordingly added to the cost of property, plant and equipment.
Trade and other payables are recognised initially at fair value plus any directly attributable transaction costs and subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method. The carrying value of trade and other payables approximate their fair values due to their short maturity. A trade and other payable is removed from the statement of financial position when the obligation specified in the contract is discharged or cancelled or expires.
The company holds derivative financial instruments to hedge its interest rate risk exposures. Embedded derivatives are separated from the host contract and accounted for separately if the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract and the embedded derivative are not closely related, a separate instrument with the same terms as the embedded derivative would meet the definition of the derivative, and the combined instrument is not measured at fair value though profit and loss.
Derivatives are recognised initially at fair value: attributable transaction costs are recognised in profit and loss when incurred. Subsequently to initial recognition, derivatives are measured at fair value, and changes therein are accounted for as described below.
When a derivative is designated as the hedging instrument in a hedge of the variability in cash flows attributable to a particular risk associated with a recognised asset or liability or a highly probable forecast transaction that could affect profit or loss, the effective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is recognised in other comprehensive income and presented in the hedging reserve in equity. The amount recognised in other comprehensive income is removed and included in profit or loss in the same period as the hedged cash flows affect profit or loss under the same line item in the statement of comprehensive income as the hedged item. Any ineffective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is recognised immediately in profit or loss. If the hedging instrument no longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting, expires or is sold, terminated, exercised, or the designation is revoked, then hedge accounting is discontinued prospectively. The cumulative gain or loss previously recognised in other comprehensive income and presented in the hedging reserve in equity remains there until the forecast transaction affects profit or loss. When the hedged item is a non-financial asset, the amount recognised in other comprehensive income is transferred to the carrying amount of the asset when the asset is recognised. If the forecast transaction is no longer expected to occur, then the balance in other comprehensive income is recognised immediately in profit or loss. In other cases the amount recognised in other comprehensive income is transferred to profit or loss in the same period that the hedged item affects profit or loss.
Changes in the fair value of separable embedded derivatives are recognised immediately in profit or loss.
When a derivative financial instrument is not held for trading, and is not designated in a qualifying hedge relationship, all changes in its fair value are recognised immediately in profit or loss.
A financial asset (or, where applicable a part of a financial asset or part of a group of similar financial assets) is derecognised when:
Where the Company has transferred its rights to receive cash flows from an asset and has neither transferred nor retained substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset nor transferred control of the asset, the asset is recognised to the extent of the Company's continuing involvement in the asset.
A financial liability is derecognised when the obligation under the liability is discharged or cancelled or expires.
Cash includes cash on hand and cash with banks. Cash equivalents are short-term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash with original maturities of three months or less and that are subject to an insignificant risk of change in value.
For the purposes of the cash flow statement, cash and cash equivalents comprise cash on hand, deposits held at call with banks, and other short-term highly liquid investments.
Financial assets not carried at fair value through profit or loss are reviewed for impairment at each statement of financial position date. A financial asset is impaired if objective evidence indicates that a loss event has occured after the initial recognition of the asset, and that the loss event had a negative effect on the estimated future cash flows of that asset that can be estimated reliably.
For financial assets carried at amortised cost, whenever it is probable that the Company will not collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of loans or receivables, an impairment or bad debt loss is recognised in the income statement. The reversal of impairment losses previously recognised is recorded when the decrease in impairment loss can be justified by an event occurring after the write-down. Such reversal is recorded in the income statement. However, the increased carrying amount is only recognised to the extent it does not exceed the amortised cost that would have been had the impairment not been recognised.
In relation to trade and other receivables impairment loss is recognised when there is objective evidence (such as the probability of insolvency or significant financial difficulties of the debtor) that the Company will not be able to collect all of the amounts due under the original terms of the invoice. The carrying amount of the receivable is reduced through use of an allowance account. Impaired debts are derecognised when they are assessed as uncollectible.
The recoverable amount of the Company"s receivables carried at amortised cost is calculated as the present value of estimated future cash flows, discounted at the original effective interest rate (i.e., the effective interest rate computed at initial recognition of these financial assets). Receivables with a short duration are not discounted.
The recoverable amount of other assets is the greater of their fair value less costs to sell and value in use. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset. For an asset that does not generate largely independent cash inflows, the recoverable amount is determined for the cash generating unit to which the asset belongs.
An impairment loss in respect of receivables carried at amortised cost is reversed if the subsequent increase in recoverable amount can be related objectively to an event occurring after the impairment loss was recognised.
An impairment loss is reversed only to the extent that the asset"s carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of depreciation or amortisation, if no impairment loss has been recognised.
Non-financial assets, except for inventories and deferred tax assets, are reviewed for posible indicators of impairment at each balance sheet date or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate posible impairment. If any such indication exists, then the assets recoverable amount is estimated.
The recoverable amount of an asset or cash-generating unit is the greater of its value in use and its fair value less costs to sell. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset. For the purpose of impairment testing, assets that cannot be tested individually are grouped together into the smallest group of assets that generates cash inflows from continuing use that are largely independent of the cash inflows of other assets or groups of assets (the "cash-generating unit, or CGU").
Whenever the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its recoverable amount, an impairment loss is recognised in the income statement. Impairment losses recognised in respect of CGUs are allocated first to reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill allocated to the units, and then to reduce the carrying amounts of the other assets in the unit (group of units) on a pro rata basis.
Reversal of impairment losses recognised in prior years is recorded when there is an indication that the impairment losses recognised for the asset no longer exist or have decreased. The reversal is accounted in the same caption of the income statement as the impairment loss.
A provision is recognized in the statement of financial position when the company has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of a past event, and it is probable that an outflow of economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation. If the effect is material, provisions are determined by discounting the expected future cash flows at a pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and, where appropriate, the risks specific to the liability.
Short-term employee benefits are recognised as a current expense in the period when employees render the services. These include salaries and wages, social security contributions, bonuses, paid holidays and other benefits. There are no long-term employee benefits.
The determination of whether an arrangement is, or contains a lease is based on the substance of the arrangement at inception date of whether the fulfilment of the arrangement is dependent on the use of specific asset or assets or the arrangement conveys a right to use the asset.
Financial lease, which transfer to the Company substantially all the risks and benefits incidental to ownership of the leased item, are capitalised at the inception of the lease at the fair value of the leased property or, if lower, at the present value of the minimum lease payments. Lease payments are apportioned between the finance charges and reduction of the lease liability so as to achieve a constant period rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability. Finance charges are reflected in profit or loss.
Capitalised leased assets are depreciated over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the asset and the lease term, if there is no reasonable certainty that the Company will obtain ownership by the end of the lease term.
Operating lease payments are recognised as expenses in profit or loss on a straight line basis over the lease term.
Dividends are recognised as a liability for the period in which they are declared.
Grants that compensate the Company for expenses incurred are recognised as revenue in the income statement on a systematic basis in the same periods in which the expenses are incurred.
Grants that compensate the Company for the cost of an asset are amortised over the same period as the asset for which the grant has been received. Amortisation costs are included in production cost or administrative costs as well as in depreciation of property, plant and equipment for which the grant has been received.
Revenue from sales of goods is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable, net of returns and allowances, trade discounts and volume rebates. Revenue is recognised in the income statement when the significant risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred to the buyer, recovery of the consideration is probable, the associated costs and possible return of goods can be estimated reliably, and there is no continuing management involvement with the goods. Transfer of risks and rewards vary depending on the individual terms of the contract of sale.
Cost of production comprises direct and indirect costs including depreciation and wages incurred in order to obtain the turnover for the year.
Selling and administrative expenses comprise expenses of transportation, administrative staff, management, office expenses, etc. including depreciation and amortization.
Other operating income and charges comprise gain or loss from disposal of non-current assets, gain or loss from intercompany transactions as well as other income and costs not related to the primary activity.
Financial income and expenses comprise interest receivable and payable, realised and unrealised exchange gains and losses regarding debtors and creditors denominated in foreign currencies.
Interest income is recognised in the income statement as it accrues. The interest expense component of finance lease payments is recognised in the income statement using the effective interest rate method.
Income tax on the profit or loss for the period comprises current and deferred tax. Income tax is recognised in the income statement except to the extent that it relates to items recognised directly to equity, in which case it is recognised in equity.
Current tax is the expected tax payable on the taxable income for the period, using tax rates enacted or substantially enacted at the balance sheet date, and any adjustment to tax payable in respect of previous years.
Standard profit tax rate applied to the companies in the Republic of Lithuania in 2009 is 20%, in 2008 - 15%. After the amendments of Income Tax Law of Republic of Lithuania had come into force, 15% tax rate has been established for an indefinite period starting 1 January 2010. Tax losses can be carried forward for indefinite period if the Company does not change its activities due to which these losses incurred, except for the losses incurred as a result of disposal of securities and/or derivative financial instruments. The losses from disposal of securities and/or derivative financial instruments can be carried forward for 5 consecutive years and only be used to reduce the taxable income earned from the transactions of the same nature.
Deferred tax is provided using the balance sheet liability method, providing for temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for taxation purposes. The amount of deferred tax provided is based on the expected manner of realisation or settlement of the carrying amount of assets and liabilities, using tax rates enacted or substantially enacted at the statement of financial position date.
Deferred tax assets have been recognised only to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which the asset can be utilised. Deferred tax assets are reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that the related tax benefit will be realised.
The Company provides information on basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share. Basic earnings per share amounts are calculated by dividing net profit for the year attributable to ordinary equity holders of the company by the weighted number of ordinary shares outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per share amounts are calculated by dividing the net profit attributable to ordinary equity holders of the company by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the year plus the weighted average number of ordinary shares that would be issued on the conversion of all the dilutive potential ordinary shares into ordinary shares. During the financial year the Company did not issue any potential ordinary shares.
An operating segment is a component of the Company that engages in business activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses, including revenues and expenses that relate to transactions with any of the Company"s other components. All operating segments" operating results are reviewed regularly by the Company"s General director to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment and assess its performance, and for which discrete financial information is available.
The accounting policies applied by the Company coincide with the accounting policies of the previous year, except that the Company has implemented those new/revised standards and their interpretations, which are mandatory for financial periods starting on or after 1 January 2009 and which are relevant to the Company"s activity:
The Company applies the revised IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements (2007), effective as of 1 January 2009. Due to this, all owner-related changes in equity are presented in the statement of changes in equity, whereas not owner related changes in equity are presented in the statement of comprehensive income. The comparative information was restated to comply with the amendment of the Standard. As the change in the accounting principle affects only the presentation aspect, there is no influence to the earnings per share.
Amendments to IFRS 4 Insurance Contracts and IFRS 7 Financial instruments: Disclosures (effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2009) aim at requiring enhanced disclosures about fair value measurements and liquidity risk associated with financial instruments. These amendments have been adopted by the Company to the extent applicable to the Company"s operations. Comparative information has been represented so that it also is in conformity with the revised standard.
The revised IAS 23 Borrowing Costs (mandatory for financial years starting 1 January 2009) has been applied as of the date stated in the Standard. The Standard does not have any influence as during 2008 and 2009 the Company did not incur any borrowing costs which should be capitalised.
IFRS 8 "Operating segments" is applicable for annual periods starting on or after 1 January 2009. The new Standard requires disclosing more information on segments based on internal reports which are reviewed by key management on a regular basis seeking to evaluate information about each segment considering whether it is a business or a geographical segment. The Company applies IFRS 8 as of the date stated in the Standard. There is no influence to earnings per share.
Several new and revised International Financial Reporting Standards and interpretations have been issued, which shall be subject to application in financial reporting starting from 1 January 2010 and subsequent years. The Company has decided not to apply earlier the new standards and interpretations. Estimates of the possible effect of the new and revised standards applied for the first time, as presented by the Company"s management, are stated below:
■ Amended IFRS 3 "Business Combinations"
Amendment to IFRS 3 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 July 2009. The Standard's scope of application was amended and the description of the purpose was expanded. The management has not yet estimated the effect of the amended IFRS 3 on the financial statements.
Amendment to IAS 27 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 July 2009. In the revised Standard the term minority interest has been replaced by noncontrolling interest, and is defined as "the equity in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent". The revised Standard also amends the accounting for non-controlling interest, the loss of control of a subsidiary, and the allocation of profit or loss and other comprehensive income between the controlling and noncontrolling interest. The management has not yet estimated the effect of the amended IAS 27 on the financial statements.
Amendment to IAS 32 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 July 2009. The amendment requires that rights, options or warrants to acquire a fixed number of the entity"s own equity instruments for a fixed amount of any currency, are equity instruments if the entity offers the rights, options or warrants pro rata to all of its existing owners of the same class of its own non-derivative equity instruments. The amendments to IAS 32 are not relevant to the Company"s financial statements as the Company has not issued such instruments.
The amended Standard clarifies the application of existing principles that determine whether specific risks or portions of cash flows are eligible for designation in a hedging relationship. In designating a hedging relationship the risks or portions must be separately identifiable and reliably measurable; however inflation cannot be designated, except in limited circumstances. Amended IAS 39 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 July 2009. Management has not yet evaluated an impact of the amendments to IAS 39 on the Company"s financial statements.
■ IFRIC 12 "Service concession arrangements"
The Interpretation provides guidance to private sector entities on certain recognition and measurement issues.
IFRIC 12 is effective for first annual periods beginning on or after 1 April 2009. As the Interpretation is applicable only from the date of application, it will not impact on the financial statements for periods prior to the date of adoption of the interpretation.
■ IFRIC 15 "Arrangements for the construction of Real Estate"
IFRIC 15 clarifies that revenue arising from agreements for the construction of real estate is recognised by reference to the stage of completion of the contract activity.
FRIC 15 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2010. IFRIC 15 is not relevant to the Company"s financial statements as the Company does not provide real estate construction services or develop real estate for sale.
The Interpretation explains the type of exposure that may be hedged. It explains where in the group the hedged item may be held, whether the method of consolidation affects hedge effectiveness, the form the hedged instrument may take and which amounts are reclassified from equity to profit or loss on disposal of the foreign operation. IFRIC 16 is not relevant to the Company"s financial statements as the Company does not have any investments in a foreign operation.
■ IFRIC 17 "Distributions of Non-cash Assets to Owners"
The Interpretation applies to non-reciprocal distributions of non-cash assets to owners acting in their capacity as owners. In accordance with the Interpretation a liability to pay a dividend shall be recognised when the dividend is appropriately authorised and is no longer at the discretion of the entity and shall be measured at the fair value of the assets to be distributed. The carrying amount of the dividend payable shall be remeasured at each reporting date, with any changes in the carrying amount recognised in equity as adjustments to the amount of the distribution. When the dividend payable is settled the difference, if any, between the carrying amount of the assets distributed and the carrying amount of the dividend payable shall be recognised in profit or loss.
IFRIC 17 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after 15 July 2009. As the Interpretation is applicable only from the date of application, it will not impact on the financial statements for periods prior to the date of adoption of the interpretation. Further, since it relates to future dividends that will be at the discretion of the board of directors/shareholders it is not possible to determine the effects of application in advance.
IFRIC 18 is effective prospectively for transfers of assets from customers received on or after 1 July 2009. The Interpretation applies to the accounting by entities that receive contributions of property, plant and equipment from their customers. The Interpretation requires an entity that receives a contribution in the scope of the Interpretation to recognize the item as an asset at its fair value if the contributed item meets the criteria for property, plant and equipment in IAS 16, Property, Plant and Equipment. The Interpretation also requires the entity to recognize the amount as revenue; the timing of the revenue recognition will depend on the facts and circumstances of the particular agreement. The Interpretation is not relevant to the Company"s financial statements as the Company does not receive in scope asset contributions from its customers.
Contingent liabilities are not recognised in the financial statements. They are disclosed unless the possibility of an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits is remote.
Contingent assets are not recognised in the financial statements but disclosed when an inflow or economic benefits is probable.
Post-balance sheet events that provide additional information about the Company"s position at the balance sheet date (adjusting events) are reflected in the financial statements. Postbalance sheet events that are not adjusting events are disclosed in the notes when material.
Estimates and judgments are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.
The Company makes estimates and assumptions concerning the future. The resulting accounting estimates will, by definition, seldom equal the related actual results. The estimates and assumptions that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of the assets and liabilities within the next financial year are discussed below.
The carrying amounts of the Company's property, plant and equipment are reviewed at each reporting date to determine whether there is any indication of impairment. If any such indication exists, then the asset's recoverable amount is estimated. For the purpose of impairment testing, assets are grouped together into the smallest group of assets that generates cash inflows from continuing use that are largely independent of the cash inflows of other assets or groups of assets (the cash-generating unit).
The recoverable amount of an asset or cash-generating unit is the greater of its value in use and its fair value less costs to sell. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessment of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset. An impairment loss is recognised if the carrying amount of an asset or its cash-generating unit exceeds its estimated recoverable value.
The Company reviews its receivables to assess impairment at least on a quarterly basis. In determining whether an impairment loss should be recorded in the income statement, the Company makes judgments as to whether there is any observable data indicating that there is a measurable decrease in the estimated future cash flows from a portfolio of receivables before the decrease can be identified with an individual receivable in that portfolio. This evidence may include observable data indicating that there has been an adverse change in the payment status of debtors, national or local economic conditions that influence the Company of the receivables.
The management evaluates probable cash flows from the debtors based on historical loss experience related to the debtors with a similar credit risk. Methodology and assumptions used for estimating both the amount and timing of future cash flows are reviewed regularly to reduce any differences between loss estimates and actual loss experience.
Asset useful lives are assessed annually and changed when necessary to reflect current thinking on their remaining lives in light of technological change, prospective economic utilisation and physical condition of the assets concerned.
The Company has exposure to the following risks from its use of financial instruments:
The Board of Directors has overall responsibility for the establishment and oversight of the Company"s risk management framework. The Company"s risk management policies are established to identify and analyse the risks faced by the Company, to set appropriate risk limits and controls, and to monitor risks and adherence to limits. Risk management policies and systems are reviewed regularly to reflect changes in market conditions and the Company"s activities. The Company, through its training and management standards and procedures, aims to develop a disciplined and constructive control environment in which all employees understand their roles and obligations.
The note "Financial instruments and risk management" presents information about the Company"s exposure to each of the above risks, the Company"s objectives, policies and processes for measuring and managing risk, and the Company"s management of capital. Further quantitative disclosures are also included throughout these annual financial statements.
The Company has three reportable segments, as discussed below. The segments are different product groups, which are managed separately because they require different technology and marketing strategy. For each of the product groups, the general director reviews internal management reports on at least monthly basis.
The following summary describes the products in each of the Company"s reportable segments:
Information regarding the results of each reportable segment is included below. Performance is measured based on segment gross profit, as included in the internal management reports that are reviewed by the General director. Segment gross profit is used to measure performance as management believes that such information is the most relevant in evaluating the results.
Segments results for the year ended 31 December 2009 are as follows:
| Thousand Litas | Cheese and cheese products produced by the Company |
Other products |
Raw milk | Other dairy products acquired for resale |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 66,764 | 29,645 | 29,803 | 19,532 | 145,744 |
| Cost of sales | -60,412 | -23,039 | -29,912 | -18,896 | -132,259 |
| Gross profit | 6,352 | 6,606 | -109 | 636 | 13,485 |
| Thousand Litas | Cheese and cheese products produced by the Company |
Other products |
Raw milk | Other dairy products acquired for resale |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 93,434 | 29,066 | 21,835 | 1,070 | 145,405 |
| Cost of sales | -90,462 | -32,442 | -21,640 | -1,064 | -145,608 |
| Gross profit | 2,972 | -3,376 | 195 | 6 | -203 |
Management"s opinion is that it is not expedient to allocate general and administrative costs, finance income and costs, assets and liabilities to separate reportable segments.
Company has only one customer of raw milk, for which sales for the year comprised more than 10% from total sales.
When presenting information on the basis of geographical segments, income from segments is recognised according to a geographical location of a client. Assets of segments are allocated as geographical location of clients.
Segment results for 2009 by geographical segments are as follows:
| Thousand Litas | Countries of European Union except Lithuania |
Lithuania | Russia | Other countries |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 59,780 | 68,476 | 15,775 | 1,713 | 145,744 |
| Segment result | 7,015 | 4,349 | 1,924 | 197 | 13,485 |
| Not allocated costs | -5,875 | ||||
| Operating result Financial items, net |
7,610 -2,257 |
||||
| Result before tax Income tax expenses |
5,353 -1,249 |
||||
| Net result for the year | 4,104 | ||||
| Segment receivables Not allocated assets |
2,690 | 9,283 88,690 |
1,309 | 72 | 13,354 88,690 |
| Total assets | 2,690 | 97,973 | 1,309 | 72 | 102,044 |
| Not allocated liabilities | 63,365 | ||||
| Not allocated cash flows from ordinary activities Not allocated cash flows from |
12,121 | ||||
| investing activities | -1,840 | ||||
| Not allocated cash flows from financing activities |
-9,940 -986 | ||||
| Net cash flows | 341 | ||||
| Not allocated acquisitions of non-current assets |
-1,895 |
Segment results for 2008 by geographical segments are as follows:
| Thousand Litas | Countries of European Union except Lithuania |
Lithuania | Russia | Other countries |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 60,746 | 62,854 | 20,630 | 1,175 | 145,405 |
| Segment result | -2,944 | 2,574 | 106 | 61 | -203 |
| Not allocated costs | -8,391 | ||||
| Operating result Financial items, net |
-8,354 -2,827 |
||||
| Result before tax Income tax expenses |
-11,181 1,444 |
||||
| Net result for the year | -9,737 | ||||
| Segment receivables Not allocated assets |
3,089 | 11,342 93,348 |
1,535 | 1 | 15,967 93,348 |
| Total assets | 3,089 | 106,333 | 1,535 | 1 | 109,315 |
| Not allocated liabilities | 75,279 | ||||
| Not allocated cash flows from ordinary activities |
-3,492 | ||||
| Not allocated cash flows from investing activities |
-35,706 | ||||
| Not allocated cash flows from financing activities |
38,212 -986 | ||||
| Net cash flows | -986 | ||||
| Not allocated acquisitions of non-current assets |
-6,047 |
| Thousand Litas | 2009 | 2008 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Cost of sales | ||
| Raw materials | -96,752 | -116,530 | |
| Cost of resold items | -18,890 | -1,064 | |
| Other costs | -17,479 | -27,152 | |
| Reversal (write down) due to net realizable value adjustments |
862 | -862 | |
| -132,259 | -145,608 | ||
| 3 | Distribution costs | ||
| Staff costs | -648 | -485 | |
| Transportation | -984 | -791 | |
| Logistics | -316 | -330 | |
| Marketing and advertising | -318 | -173 | |
| Other sales costs | -411 | -298 | |
| -2,677 | -2,077 | ||
| 4 | Administrative costs | ||
| Staff costs | -1,784 | -1,945 | |
| Depreciation and amortization | -471 | -257 | |
| Taxes except for income tax | -316 | -240 | |
| Bank charges | -258 | -346 | |
| Consulting cost | -218 | -229 | |
| (Impairment) and reversal of impairment of the | |||
| receivable from UAB Kelmės Pieno Centras | 154 | -1,750 | |
| Repair | -58 | -156 | |
| Insurance | -53 | -185 | |
| Other | -503 | -1,206 | |
| -3,507 | -6,314 | ||
| 5 | Net financing costs | ||
| Finance income Penalties and fines |
|||
| Interest | 20 30 |
3 94 |
|
| Total finance income | 50 | 97 | |
| Finance costs | |||
| Interest Loss from foreign exchange |
-2,035 | -2,833 | |
| Other | -146 -126 |
-66 -25 |
|
| Total finance costs | -2,307 | -2,924 | |
| -2,257 | -2,827 |
The Company did not incur any current income tax expenses for the periods ended 31 December 2009 and 2008 as it did not have any taxable profit for the mentioned periods.
| Thousand Litas | 2009 | 2008 |
|---|---|---|
| Recognised in the income statement | ||
| Current income tax expense Current period |
- | - |
| Deferred tax | ||
| Change in deferred tax | -1,249 | 1,444 |
| -1,249 | 1,444 |
Deferred tax liability, recognised in equity, amounts to 1,356 tLTL as at 31 December 2009 (2008: 1,896 tLTL).
| Thousand Litas | 2009 | 2008 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Profit (loss) before tax | 5,353 | -11,181 | ||
| Income tax expense | -1,249 | 1,444 | ||
| Net profit (loss) | 4,104 | -9,737 | ||
| Income tax applying the effective tax rate | 20% | 1,071 | -15% | -1,678 |
| Non-deductible expenses | 4,05% | 241 | 7,45% | 834 |
| Non-taxable income | -5,04% | -270 | -4,23% | -473 |
| Tax loss carried forward from the previous year |
-32,37% | -1,733 | - | - |
| Change in tax rate | 36,24% | 1,940 | -1,14% | -127 |
| Income tax expense | 22,88% | 1,249 | -12,92% | -1,444 |
| 2009 | 2008 | |
|---|---|---|
| Number of issued shares calculated based on weighted average method, in thousand |
11,943 | 11,296 |
| Net profit, attributable to ordinary share holders, in thousand Litas |
4,104 | -9,737 |
| Basic earnings per share, in Litas | 0.34 | -0.86 |
The diluted earnings per share are the same as basic earnings per share.
| Thousand Litas | Land and buildings |
Machinery and equipment |
Other | Construction in progress |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost | |||||
| Balance as at 1 January 2008 | 18,429 | 32,493 | 10,220 | 1,426 | 62,568 |
| Acquisitions | 1,077 | 2,582 | 348 | 1,758 | 5,765 |
| Disposals | - | -421 | -432 | - | -853 |
| Reclassification | 560 | - | - | -560 | - |
| Balance as at 31 December 2008 | 20,066 | 34,654 | 10,136 | 2,624 | 67,480 |
| Balance as at 1 January 2009 | 20,066 | 34,654 | 10,136 | 2,624 | 67,480 |
| Acquisitions | 48 | 744 | 2 | 651 | 1,445 |
| Disposals | -8 | -1,057 | -70 | - | -1,135 |
| Reclassification | 98 | 51 | - | -149 | - |
| Balance as at 31 December 2009 | 20,204 | 34,392 | 10,068 | 3,126 | 67,790 |
| Depreciation and impairment | |||||
| Balance as at 1 January 2008 | 619 | 13,385 | 5,838 | - | 19,842 |
| Depreciation for the year | 1,117 | 2,280 | 999 | - | 4,396 |
| Disposals | - | -254 | -313 | - | -567 |
| Reclassification | - | - | - | - | - |
| Balance as at 31 December 2008 | 1,736 | 15,411 | 6,524 | - | 23,671 |
| Balance as at 1 January 2009 | 1,736 | 15,411 | 6,524 | - | 23,671 |
| Depreciation for the year | 2,202 | 1,932 | 173 | - | 4,307 |
| Disposals | -5 | -778 | -175 | - | -958 |
| Reclassification | - | - | - | - | - |
| Balance as at 31 December 2009 | 3,933 | 16,565 | 6,522 | - | 27,020 |
| Carrying amounts | |||||
| 1 January 2008 | 17,810 | 19,108 | 4,382 | 1,426 | 42,726 |
| 31 December 2008 | 18,330 | 19,243 | 3,612 | 2,624 | 43,809 |
| 1 January 2009 | 18,330 | 19,243 | 3,612 | 2,624 | 43,809 |
| 31 December 2009 | 16,271 | 17,827 | 3,546 | 3,126 | 40,770 |
Amount of 3,977 thousand Litas (2008: 4,164 thousand Litas) of depreciation of property, plant and equipment was allocated to the cost of inventory and is recognised in the cost of sales as inventory is sold. The rest part of 330 thousand Litas (2008: 232 thousand Litas) is included in administrative costs.
Prepayments for Property, Plant and Equipment are classified as acquisitions of Property, Plant and Equipment.
To secure bank loans, the Company has pledged its non-current assets with a book value of 33,001 thousand Litas as at 31 December 2009 (2008: 39,836 thousand Litas ) (note 16).
Acquisition cost of depreciated non-current assets in use amounts to 8,163 thousand Litas as at 31 December 2009 (2008: 7,965 thousand Litas)
The Company has acquired transport vehicles and equipment by way of finance lease. The carrying amount of the leased assets amounted to 2,860 thousand Litas as at 31 December 2009 (2008: 3,433 thousand Litas). The leasing liabilities are secured by pledging the leased assets (note 16).
Buildings are stated at revalued amounts less subsequent accumulated depreciation. Last revaluation was performed in 2006 by independent valuer and fair values were determined and fair values were determined by reference to observable prices in an active market. Based on the management"s analysis, fair values determined in the year 2006 less accumulated depreciation are not significantly different from those determined in the year 2009. If the buildings were carried at cost model, the carrying amount recognized as at 31 December 2009 would be 7,229 thousand Litas (31 December 2008: 8,849 thousand Litas).
Depreciation is recorded in the following items:
| Thousand Litas | 2009 | 2008 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost of finished goods | 3,977 | 4,164 |
| Distribution and administrative expenses | 330 | 232 |
| 4,307 | 4,396 |
| Thousand Litas | Software | Total |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | ||
| Balance as at 1 January 2008 | 627 | 627 |
| Acquisitions | 283 | 283 |
| Balance as at 31 December 2008 | 910 | 910 |
| Balance as at 1 January 2009 | 910 | 910 |
| Acquisitions | 450 | 450 |
| Balance as at 31 December 2009 | 1,360 | 1,360 |
| Amortisation and impairment | ||
| Balance as at 1 January 2008 | 586 | 586 |
| Amortisation for the year | 25 | 25 |
| Balance as at 31 December 2008 | 611 | 611 |
| Balance as at 1 January 2009 | 611 | 611 |
| Amortisation for the year | 141 | 141 |
| Balance as at 31 December 2009 | 752 | 752 |
| Carrying amounts | ||
| 1 January 2008 | 41 | 41 |
| 31 December 2008 | 299 | 299 |
| 1 January 2009 | 299 | 299 |
| 31 December 2009 | 608 | 608 |
Amortisation charge is included in administrative costs.
| Thousand Litas | 2009 | 2008 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost of shares of AB Modest | 1,872 | 1,381 |
| Cost of shares of AB Kelmės Pieninė | 30,062 | 30,062 |
| 31,934 | 31,443 |
In 2006 the Company in several steps acquired an 89% shareholding of AB Modest. The control was taken over on 3 January 2006, when a shareholding of 80% was acquired.
In 2009 AB Vilkyškių pieninė converted a loan receivable from AB Modest to investment and percentage owned by the Company increased to 97.2%.
On 30 April 2008, based on the agreement of purchase-sale of shares the Company acquired a 99% shareholding of AB Kelmės Pieninė.
The key financial figures of AB Modest as at 31 December 2009 are as follows:
| Thousand Litas | 2009 | 2008 |
|---|---|---|
| Total assets | 8,616 | 13,612 |
| Equity | -2,745 | -1,982 |
| Net profit (loss) | -977 | -2,612 |
Allocation of the acquisition price of AB Modest shares:
| Net assets acquired Goodwill |
348 1,033 |
348 1,033 |
|---|---|---|
| Increase of share capital | 481 | - |
| Cost of acquisition | 1,872 | 1,381 |
The key financial figures of AB Kelmės Pieninė as at 31 December 2009 (including UAB Kelmės Pieno Centras, the subsidiary of AB Kelmės Pieninė):
| Total assets | 34,065 | 31,316 |
|---|---|---|
| Equity | 9,672 | 6,047 |
| Net profit (loss) | 3,608 | 1,644 |
Allocation of the acquisition price of AB Kelmės Pieninė shares:
| Net assets acquired | 7,220 | 7,220 |
|---|---|---|
| Goodwill | 22,842 | 22,842 |
| Cost of acquisition | 30,062 | 30,062 |
Goodwill resulting from business combination is attributable mainly to synergy, which is expected to be reached after integration of the company in the Group"s activity related to production of dairy products.
| Thousand Litas | Note | 2009 | 2008 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prepayments to related parties | 22 | 842 | 842 |
| Loans issued to related parties | 351 | 840 | |
| Long-term receivables from customers | 217 | - | |
| Long-term receivables from farmers | - | 20 | |
| 1,410 | 1,702 |
A prepayment (842 thousand Litas) is made to a related company ŪKB Šilgaliai. An agreement was drawn up in 2007, based on which the prepayment shall be fully covered until 31 December 2012. Starting from 2009, the prepayment will be covered by milk supplied by ŪKB Šilgaliai. The outstanding balance of the prepayment bears an annual interest of 5%.
A loan of 351 thousand Litas, issued to a related party ŪKB Šilgaliai, matures on 31 December 2012. The outstanding balance of the prepayment bears an annual interest of 5%.
Credit and foreign currency risks, encountered by the Company, and impairment losses related to trade and other receivable amounts are disclosed in note 23.
| Finished production Write down to net realizable value |
12,310 - |
13,748 -862 |
|---|---|---|
| 12,310 | 12,886 | |
| Raw materials | 75 | 277 |
| Other auxiliary materials | 1,206 | 1,779 |
| 13,591 | 14,942 |
Raw materials comprise raw milk and other materials used in production.
As at 31 December 2009 there was no write down of inventories (2008 : 862 tLTL). Write down of inventories to net realisable value and reversal of impairment are included in the cost of sales.
In 2009 changes in raw materials, auxiliaries and finished goods as well as construction in progress are recognised in the cost of sales at an amount of 117,158 tLTL (2008 : 129,252 tLTL).
As at 31 December 2009 the inventories, the carrying amount of which amounts up to 15 million LTL (2008 : up to 15 million LTL), have been pledged to financial institutions (note 16).
| Thousand Litas | 2009 | 2008 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Note | |||
| Trade receivables | 7,225 | 7,259 | |
| Trade receivables due from related parties | 22 | 4,090 | 5,013 |
| Receivable capital grants | - | 2,169 | |
| Prepayments | a) | 341 | 177 |
| Receivable export compensations | b) | 100 | - |
| Receivable taxes | 626 | - | |
| Other receivable amounts | 972 | 1,349 | |
| 13,354 | 15,967 |
Credit and foreign currency risks, encountered by the Company, and impairment losses related to trade and other receivable amounts are disclosed in note 23.
a) Prepayments mainly include advance payments to farmers for milk.
b) Receivable export compensation for export of production to Russia.
Trade and other receivable amounts are interest free and their settlement term is up to 30 days.
| Cash at bank | 199 | 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cash in hand | 178 | 32 |
| 377 | 36 |
All account balances as at 31 December 2009 have been pledged to secure bank loans (note 16). Furthermore, cash inflows in the bank accounts are pledged to secure bank loans (note 16).
The interest rate risk, encountered by the Company, is related to cash and cash equivalents and is disclosed in note 23.
Authorised capital of the parent company as at 31 December 2009 comprised 11,943,000 ordinary shares at par value of 1 LTL each. All shares are paid in.
According to the Companies Law holders of ordinary shares have at the shareholders meeting one voting right for one share and the right to dividends, which are announced from time to time, and to participate in capital on a winding up.
Share premium is the difference between issue price and nominal value of the shares.
Following the legislation, annual allocation to the legal reserve should amount to at least 5% of the net profit until the reserve makes up 10% of the share capital. The reserve can be used only for coverage of retained losses.
Revaluation reserve is related to revaluation of buildings and is stated net of deferred tax liability.
The reserve is decreased in proportion to depreciation and disposal of revaluated assets. The decrease is recognised directly in equity.
When depreciating the revaluated buildings, a transfer is made from the revaluation reserve to retained earnings. The amount for transfer is determined as a difference between depreciation, calculated from the restated value, and depreciation, calculated from the initial cost of the buildings.
The revaluation reserve can be used for an increase of authorised capital.
The Company"s interest bearing loans and leasing liabilities are as follows:
| Loan | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| amount, | Balance at | Balance at | |||
| Credit institution | Ref. | Currency | tLTL | 31-12-2009 | 31-12-2008 |
| AB SEB Bankas | a) | EUR | 18,283 | 10,270 | 12,315 |
| AB Snoro Bankas | b) | EUR | 2,072 | 418 | 832 |
| AB Snoro Bankas | b) | EUR | 8,386 | 8,001 | 8,386 |
| AB Snoro Bankas | b) | EUR | 1,554 | 1,208 | 1,554 |
| AB Snoro Bankas | b) | LTL | 350 | 350 | - |
| AB SEB Bankas | c) | EUR | 3,459 | 3,459 | 3,459 |
| AB SEB Bankas Faktoringas | d) | EUR | 2,141 | - | 995 |
| Swedbank AB | e) | EUR | 6,300 | 5,681 | 6,290 |
| AB SEB Bankas | f) | EUR | 7,078 | 2,389 | 4,536 |
| AB SEB Bankas Kredito Linija | g) | EUR | 7,506 | 4,723 | 7,007 |
| AB Kelmės Pieninė | h) 22 | LTL | 2,600 | 2,600 | 2,600 |
| Finance lease liabilities | j) | EUR | 1,787 | 2,852 | |
| Total liabilities | 40,886 | 50,826 | |||
| Less: current part | -14,557 | -15,136 | |||
| Loans and borrowings payable after one year | 26,329 | 35,690 |
a) The loan (3,475 tEUR) was used to re-finance the previously received loans from AB SEB Bankas and AB Bankas Snoras as well as for working capital needs. The loan is repayable in equal monthly instalments, except for January and February. The loan matures on 26 December 2011. The second part (1,820 thousand EUR) was granted on 28-04-2008 for acquisition of AB Kelmės Pieninė. Repayment of the second part (1,820 thousand EUR) started on 30-06-2008, and is in equal quarterly installments. The loan shall be repaid by27- 04-2015. The determined interest rate is related to 6 months EURIBOR + margin. The Company obligated to the bank to maintain EBITDA of 13 million Litas and interest coverage ratio of 1,2 at the end of the financial year. The loan is secured by pledging property, plant and equipment (note 8), inventories (note 12), bank account balances, trademarks and shares (nominal value of 6,016,506 LTL).
b) AB Vilkyškių Pieninė was granted credit facilities (in total amounting to 3,855 thousand EUR) for working capital needs. The maturity date is 24 January 2011 with interim payment of 350 thousand LTL in June 2010. The liability is secured by the primary and secondary pledge of non-current assets, the land rent rights and cash at bank. The credit facility bears interest of 6 months EURIBOR + margin, except for 350 thousand Litas loan which carries fixed interest rate.
c) The loan (1,002 thousand EUR) was issued to AB Vilkyškių Pieninė on 21-04-2008 for financing the project of EU Structural Funds for the period 2007-2013. Repayment of the loan starts as of 31-03-2010, in equal quarterly instalments and ends on 31-03-2015. The loan is secured by pledging buildings and equipment by secondary pledge and equipment by primary pledge. The effective interest rate is 6 months EURIBOR + margin.
d) A factoring agreement was signed by AB Vilkyškių Pieninė on 05-06-2008 for the purpose of factorising several foreign clients and UAB Palink. The interest rate of the factoring agreements is related to 12 months Euribor + margin. The factoring was settled as at 31 December 2009.
e) The loan was granted to AB Vilkyškių Pieninė (1,825 thousand EUR) on 28-04-2008 for acquisition of AB Kelmės Pieninė. Repayment of the loan starts as of 30-09-2008 in equal annual instalments until 28-04-2013. The loan is secured by pledging inventories, equipment, current and future cash inflows on account at AB Swedbank, as well as 50 per cent of the shares of AB Kelmės Pieninė. The effective interest rate is 6 months EURIBOR + margin. The Company obligated to the bank to maintain debt service coverage ratio of 1.2 at the end of the financial year, equity ratio not less than 0.2 and net financial debt / EBITDA not more than 6.
f) The loan agreement was concluded on 11 February 2006. The funds received are used for acquisition of new equipment used in whey processing, production of cheese, expansion of capacities of the workshop for acceptance of milk. It is expected to receive a grant from the Structural Funds of EU, amounting to 2,189 tLTL, which will be used for partial repayment of the loan. To the secure the loan the Company pledged its movable and not movable assets. The loan is repayable in equal parts and matures on 20 December 2012. The Company took an obligation to maintain the annual EBITDA ratio not less than 9 million Litas. The effective interest rate is 6 months EURIBOR + margin.
g) According to the agreement, dated 14 June 2006, the Company was granted a credit facility of 1,160 tEUR for working capital needs. The credit limit for a day is increased up to 2,174 tEUR. The liability matures on July 2010. To secure the liability the Company has pledged its real estate and equipment by secondary pledge. The effective interest rate is 6 months EURIBOR + margin.
h) In 2008 the Company concluded a long-term loan agreement with AB Kelmės Pienine for an amount of 2,600 thousand Litas. The loan, which bears fixed interest rate, matures on 28- 05-2018.
j) Finance lease agreements are drawn up with UAB SEB Banko Lizingas and are valid until October 2013.
In 2009 the Company did not comply with certain ratios prescribed in the loan covenants.
If the Company followed the classification criteria defined by IAS 1, payable loans of 16,983 tLTL would be classified as current liabilities.
| Thousand Litas | 2009 | 2008 |
|---|---|---|
| Within one year | 13,757 | 14,092 |
| From 1 to 5 years | 18,196 | 29,396 |
| After 5 years | 7,146 | 4,486 |
| 39,099 | 47,974 | |
The effective interest rate applied in 2009 was 4.8% (2008 : 7,56%).
The finance lease payments are as follows:
| Within 1 year | 831 | 1,169 |
|---|---|---|
| From 1 to 5 years | 1,010 | 2,024 |
| 1,841 | 3,193 | |
| Future interest on finance lease | -54 | -341 |
| Present value of finance lease liabilities | 1,787 | 2,852 |
Finance lease agreements do not contain any contingent lease payments.
| Thousand Litas | 2009 | 2008 |
|---|---|---|
| Carrying amount at the beginning of the period |
3,339 | 3,608 |
| Grants received Amortisation recognised in the income statement |
- -268 |
- -269 |
| Carrying amount at the end of the period | 3,071 | 3,339 |
The Company has received grants from the National Settlement Agency as to the Lithuanian farming development program 2004-2006. The grants were received for acquisition of property, plant and equipment and construction. The mentioned grants are amortised in proportion to depreciation of the assets acquired.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities calculated applying a 15% tax rate in 2009 (2008 : 20%), are attributed to the following items:
| Assets | Liabilities | Net value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thousand Litas | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 |
| Property, plant and | ||||||
| equipment | - | - | 3,027 | 3,868 | 3,027 | 3,868 |
| Vacation reserve | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Inventories | - | -172 | - | - | - | -172 |
| Government grants | -193 | -156 | - | - | -193 | -156 |
| Other accruals | -7 | -194 | - | - | -7 | -194 |
| Tax losses to be |
||||||
| carried forward | -526 | -1,755 | - | - | -526 | -1,755 |
| Deferred tax (asset) / | ||||||
| liabilities | -726 | -2,277 | 3,027 | 3,868 | 2,301 | 1,591 |
Tax losses can be carried forward for indefinite period, except for the losses incurred as a result of disposal of securities and/or derivative financial instruments. Such carrying forward is disrupted if the Company changes its activities due to which these losses were incurred. This is not applicable when the Company does not continue its activities due to reasons which do not depend on Company itself. The losses from disposal of securities and/or derivative financial instruments can be carried forward for 5 consecutive years and only be used to reduce the taxable income earned from the transactions of the same nature.
Decrease in deferred tax liability by 539 tLTL, related to revaluation of non-current assets, was recognised by increasing the revaluation reserve in equity. The increase in the deferred tax liability recognised in the income statement amounted to 1,249 tLTL.
| Thousand Litas | Note | 2009 | 2008 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trade payables | 10,887 | 15,777 | |
| Trade payables to related parties | 22 | 3,138 | - |
| Employment related liabilities | 1,934 | 2,011 | |
| Other payable amounts and accrued costs | 336 | 334 | |
| Prepayments received | 708 | 1,036 | |
| Fair value of interest rate swap transaction | 104 | 95 | |
| 17,107 | 19,253 |
Foreign currency and liquidity risks of the Company, related to trade and other payable amounts are disclosed in note 23.
At the date of statement of financial position there were no litigations raised against the Company.
As at 31 December the Company had the following material contractual liabilities:
| Thousand Litas | 2009 | 2008 |
|---|---|---|
| Acquisition of property, plant and equipment | 2,376 | - |
| Purchase of raw materials |
7,600 | 8,200 |
| 9,976 | 8,200 |
On 28 October 2009 the Company and National payment agency signed an agreement for provision of a government grant up to 6,634 tLTL according to project Increase of competitiveness in milk processing. Total estimated investment project cost amounts to 33,171 tLTL.
The following assets of the Company were pledged as at 31 December 2009 to secure the bank loans (note 16):
| Staff costs are included in the following items: | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cost of inventories | 8,673 | 8,286 |
| Administrative expenses | 2,432 | 2,430 |
| 11,105 | 10,716 |
Cost of inventories is accounted for in cost of sales after the inventories are sold.
Staff costs include social security of 30.98% paid by the Company, calculated from the nominal salary of employees.
Staff costs include remuneration to the Company"s management of 594 tLTL including social security contributions (2008: 661 tLTL).
| Transactions with related parties | ||
|---|---|---|
| Thousand Litas | 2009 | 2008 |
| Payable amounts | ||
| 2,600 | ||
| 2,600 | ||
| - | ||
| - | ||
| 5,738 | 2,600 | |
| Prepayments | ||
| KŢŪB Šilgaliai | 842 | 842 |
| 842 | 842 | |
| 4,653 | ||
| KŢŪB Šilgaliai | 137 | 66 |
| UAB Kelmės Pieno Centras | 1,596 | 2,044 |
| Impairment allowance for UAB Kelmės pieno centras |
-1,596 | -1,750 |
| 4,090 | 5,013 | |
| KŢŪB Šilgaliai | 351 | 351 |
| AB Modest | - | 489 |
| 351 | 840 | |
| 5,283 | 6,695 | |
| AB Kelmės Pieninė | 156 | 107 |
| 156 | 107 | |
| AB Kelmės Pieninė | 26,926 | 408 |
| UAB Kelmės Pieno Centras | - | 11,878 |
| 12,933 | ||
| 64 | ||
| 25,283 | ||
| AB Kelmės Pieninė | 12,799 | 5,116 |
| 4,145 14,622 |
||
| KŢŪB Šilgaliai | 503 | 972 |
| 25,402 | 24,855 | |
| Loans Loan payable to AB Kelmės Pieninė Trade payable amounts AB Kelmės Pieninė Receivable amounts Trade receivable amounts AB Modest Loans raised Interest expenses Sale of raw materials, goods and services AB Modest KŢŪB Šilgaliai Purchase of raw materials, goods and services UAB Kelmės Pieno Centras AB Modest |
2,600 2,600 3,138 3,138 3,953 8,125 64 35,115 2 12,098 |
ŪKB Šilgaliai is supplier of milk. The major shareholder and persons related to him have ownership right to part of interests in ŪKB Šilgaliai.
AB Modest and AB Kelmės Pieninė are subsidiary companies. UAB Kelmės Pieno Centras is a subsidiary of AB Kelmės Pieninė.
Remuneration to management amounted to 452 tLTL as at 31 December 2009 (2008 : 493 tLTL). Salaries to management are included in the item of administrative costs under "Staff costs" (note 21):
Prepayments to management are accounted for in receivable amounts:
| Thousand Litas | 2009 | 2008 |
|---|---|---|
| Other amounts receivable from management | 611 | 712 |
The carrying amount of financial assets represents the maximum credit exposure. The maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting date was as follows:
| Thousand Litas | Carrying amount | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Note | 2009 | 2008 | ||
| Trade receivables | 11,13 | 11,532 | 12,272 | |
| Prepayments | 11,13 | 1,183 | 1,019 | |
| Other receivables | 11,13 | 1,698 | 3,538 | |
| Loans raised | 11,22 | 351 | 840 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 14 | 377 | 36 | |
| 15,141 | 17,705 |
The maximum exposure to credit risk for trade receivables at the reporting date by geographic region was as follows:
| Carrying amount | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 2008 | ||
| Lithuania | 7,419 | 5,792 | |
| Latvia | 2,118 | 1,584 | |
| Estonia | 55 | 28 | |
| Russia | 1,247 | 1,533 | |
| Other | 693 | 3,335 | |
| 11,532 | 12,272 |
The Company establishes an allowance for impairment that represents its estimate of incurred losses in respect of trade and other receivables. This allowance for impairment includes only specific loss, related to individually significant trade and other receivables.
Ageing of trade receivables, prepayments, other receivables and loan term receivables as at the reporting date can be specified as follows:
| Impairment | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 12 31 | 2009 12 31 | 2008 12 31 | 2008 12 31 |
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| 3,522 | -1,596 | 3,190 | -1,750 |
| 6,879 | -1,596 | 8,445 | -1,750 |
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| 627 | - | 435 | - |
| 9,481 | - | 10,974 | - |
| 16,360 | -1,596 | 19,419 | -1,750 |
| Gross 1,593 770 994 8,149 580 125 |
Impairment - - - - - - |
Gross 3,580 192 1,483 5,297 3,348 1,894 |
The movement in the allowance for impairment in respect of trade and other receivables during the year was as follows:
| Carrying amount | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 2008 | ||
| Balance as at 1 January | -1,750 | - | |
| Impairment loss recognised | - | -1,750 | |
| Impairment loss derecognised | 154 | - | |
| Balance as at 31 December | -1,596 | -1,750 |
As at 31 December 2009 and 31 December 2008 an impairment loss recognized relates to receivable from related company UAB Kelmės pieno centras. Recognition and reversal of the impairment loss is recorded under administrative costs (note 4).
The Company believes that the unimpaired amounts that are past due by more than 30 days are still collectible, based on historic payment behaviour and extensive analyses of the underlying customers" solvency.
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due. The Company"s approach to managing liquidity is to ensure, as far as possible, that it will always have sufficient liquidity to meet its liabilities when due, under both normal and stressed conditions, without incurring unacceptable losses or risking damage to the Company"s reputation.
The Company"s policy is to maintain sufficient cash and cash equivalents or have available funding through an adequate amount of committed credit facilities to meet its commitments at a given date in accordance with its strategic plans. The Company"s liquidity (total current assets / total current liabilities) and quick ratios ((total current assets - inventories) / total current liabilities) as of 31 December 2009 were 0.86 and 0.43 respectively (0.93 and 0.5 as of 31 December 2008, respectively).
The Company's objective is to maintain a balance between continuity of funding and flexibility. The Company's activities generate sufficient amount of cash, therefore the main managements' responsibility is to monitor that the liquidity ratio of the Company is close to or higher than 1.
The following are the contractual maturities of financial liabilities, including the estimated interest payments:
| Thousand Litas | Carrying amount |
Contractual cash flows |
6 months or less |
6-12 months |
1-2 years |
2-5 years |
More than 5 years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial liabilities | |||||||
| AB SEB loans | 20,841 | (22,298) | (1,886) | (7,369) | (7,135) | (5,908) | - |
| AB Snoras loans | 9,977 | (10,447) | (2,246) | (1,988) | (6,213) | - | - |
| Swedbank AB loans | 5,681 | (6,274) | (529) | (522) | (1,917) | (2,933) | (373) |
| AB Kelmės Pieninė | 2,600 | (3,770) | (78) | (78) | (156) | (468) | (2,990) |
| Finance lease liabilities | 1,787 | (1,841) | (452) | (368) | (905) | (116) | - |
| Trade and other receivables | 17,107 | (17,107) | (17,107) | - | - | - | - |
| 57, 993 | (61,737) | (22,298) | (10,325) | (16,326) | (9,425) | (3,363) |
It is not expected that the cash flows included in the maturity analysis could occur significantly earlier, or at significantly different amounts.
Liquidity risk (continued)
| Thousand Litas | Carrying amount |
Contractual cash flows |
6 months or less |
6-12 months |
1-2 years |
2-5 years | More than 5 years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial liabilities | |||||||
| AB SEB loans | 27,317 | (29,483) | (4,853) | (2,176) | (14,144) | (4,913) | (3,397) |
| AB Snoras loans | 10,772 | (11,383) | (369) | (1,057) | (9,957) | - | - |
| Swedbank AB loans | 6,290 | (7,097) | (253) | (542) | (1,945) | (3,014) | (1,343) |
| AB Kelmės Pieninė | 2,600 | (3,926) | (78) | (78) | (156) | (468) | (3,146) |
| AB SEB Faktoringas | 995 | (995) | (995) | - | - | - | - |
| Finance lease liabilities | 2,852 | (3,193) | (648) | (536) | (1,402) | (607) | - |
| Trade and other receivables | 19,523 | (19,523) | (19,523) | - | - | - | - |
| 70,349 | (75,600) | (26,719) | (4,389) | (27,604) | (9,002) | (7,886) |
The folowing interst rates were applied for discount of estimated cash flows:
| 2009 | 2008 | |
|---|---|---|
| Loans and finance lease liabilities | 3% | 5% |
The Company"s exposure to the foreign currency risk was as follows (expressed in Litas" 000), using the exchange rates, valid as at 31 December 2009:
| 31 December 2009 | 31 December 2008 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTL | EUR | LVL | LTL | EUR | LVL | |
| Long-term receivables | 1,193 | 217 | - | 1,702 | - | - |
| Trade and other receivables | 9,500 | 2,768 | 1,086 | 12,371 | 2,648 | 948 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 236 | 141 | - | 36 | - | - |
| Loans and finance lease | ||||||
| liabiliteis | (2,950) | (37,936) | - | (3,595) | (47,231) | - |
| Trade and other payables | (16,385) | (722) | - | (17,686) | (1,837) | - |
| Net exposure | (8,406) | (35,532) | 1,086 | (7,172) | (46,420) | 948 |
The following significant exchange rates for Litas were applied during the year:
| Average | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 2008 | |
| EUR | 3.4528 | 3.4528 |
| LVL | 4.8191 | 4.9153 |
The following exchange rates were applied as at 31 December:
| 2009 8 |
2008 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| EUR | 3.4528 | 3.4528 | |
| LVL | 4.8679 | 4.8872 |
A 10 percent strengthening of the Litas against the following currencies at 31 December would have increased (decreased) equity and profit and loss by the amounts shown below. This analysis is based on foreign currency exchange rate variances that the Company considered to be reasonably possible at the end of the reporting period. This analysis assumes that all other variables, in particular interest rates, remain constant. The analysis is performed on the same basis for 2008.
| 31 December 2009 Effect in Thousand Litas |
Equity | Profit (loss) |
|---|---|---|
| EUR | 3,553 | 3,553 |
| LVL | (109) | (109) |
| 31 December 2008 Effect in Thousand Litas |
Equity | Profit (loss) |
| EUR | 4,642 | 4,642 |
| LVL | (95) | (95) |
A 10 percent weakening of the Litas against the above currencies at 31 December would have had the equal but opposite effect on the above currencies to the amounts shown above, on the basis that all other variables remain constant.
The functional currency of the Company is Litas (LTL). As exchange rate of LTL to EUR is fixed at 3.4528 LTL / EUR, the Company faces foreign currency risk on purchases and sales that are denominated in currencies other than EUR. The main part of the Company"s transactions in 2009 year are denominated in LTL and EUR, therefore the Company did not expose to significant foreign currency exchange risk.
The Company"s borrowings bear variable interest rates related to EURIBOR varying from EURIBOR+1.2 % to EURIBOR+3.25%. The average effective interest rate in 2009 was close to the interest rate actually paid during 2009.
If the effective interest rate applied on the Company"s borrowings with variable interest rates increases (or decreases) by 1 percent, the interest costs for the year ended 31 December 2009 m and the profit for the year would decrease (or increase) by approximately 408 tLTL (2008 – 508 tLTL).
The Company has entered into an interest rate swap agreement with a bank, by which it partly hedges from significant interest rate fluctuations. The fair value of the interest rate swap agreement, amounting to 104 tLTL, is recognised in financial liabilities.
The Company"s income and operating cash flows are substantially independent of changes in market interest rates. The Company has no significant interest-bearing assets.
At the reporting date the interest rate profile of the Company"s interest-bearing financial instruments were as follows:
| Thousand Litas | Carrying amount | |
|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 2008 | |
| Fixed rate financial instruments | ||
| AB Kelmės Pienine loan | 2,600 | 2,600 |
| AB Bankas Snoras loan | 350 | - |
| 2,950 | 2,600 |
According to the agreements, the loan from AB Kelmės Pieninė and AB Bankas Snoras bears a fixed interest rate. Therefore, changes in interest rates would not have influence on profit or loss at the reporting date.
| 27,317 | |
|---|---|
| 6,290 | |
| 9,627 | 10,772 |
| - | 995 |
| 1,787 | 2,852 |
| 37,936 | 48,226 |
| 40,886 | 50,826 |
| 20,841 5,681 |
According to agreements, the loans bear a variable interest rate related to 6 months EURIBOR+margin.
A change of 100 basis points in interest rates at the reporting date would have increased (decreased) equity and profit or loss by the amounts shown below. This analysis assumes that all other variables, in particular foreign currency rates, remain constant. The analysis is performed on the same basis for 2008.
| Effect in thousand Litas | Profit (loss) | Equity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 bp | 100 bp | 100 bp | 100 bp | ||
| increase | decrease | increase | decrease | ||
| 31 December 2009 | |||||
| Variable rate instruments | (409) | 409 | (409) | 409 | |
| 31 December 2008 | |||||
| Variable rate instruments | (508) | 508 | (508) | 508 |
The Company"s principal financial instruments not carried at fair value are trade and other receivables, trade and other payables, non-current and current borrowings.
Fair value is defined as the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged between knowledgeable willing parties in an arm's length transaction, other than in forced or liquidation sale. Fair values are obtained from quoted market prices and discounted cash flow models as appropriate.
Financial instruments stated at fair value as at 31 December 2009 comprise derivatives. The Company does not have any other financial instruments stated at fair value as of 31 December 2009 and 2008.
The management of the Company is of the opinion that book values of trade and other receivables, trade and other payables as well as borrowings approximate their fair value.
The fair values of financial assets and liabilities together with the carrying amounts shown in the statement of financial position can be summarized as follows:
| Thousand Litas | 2009 | 2008 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carrying amount |
Fair value | Carrying amount |
Fair value | |
| Long-term receivables | 1,410 | 1,410 | 1,702 | 1,702 |
| Trade and other receivables | 13,354 | 13,354 | 15,967 | 15,967 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 377 | 377 | 36 | 36 |
| Loans and finance lease liabilities | (40,886) | (40,886) | (50,826) | (50,826) |
| Trade and other payables | (17,107) | (17,107) | (19,523) | (19,523) |
| (42,852) | (42,852) | (52,644) | (52,644) |
Financial liabilities to banks and leasing companies are related to variable interest rate, therefore the carrying amount approximates the fair value. The management is of the opinion that the fair value risk was minimal as at 31 December 2009 as the major part of financial liabilities bear a variable interest rate.
Prices of milk and dairy products vary depending on a situation in the market. The Company seeks to minimise an impact of such price fluctuations by diversifying production and striving for scale economy.
The Board"s policy is to maintain a strong capital base, in comparison with the borrowed means, so as to maintain investor, creditor and market confidence, to sustain future development of the business and to comply with externally imposed capital requirements. Capital includes equity attributable to equity holders.
The Board also seeks to maintain a balance between the higher returns that might be possible with higher levels of borrowings and the security afforded by a sound capital position.
The Company manages its capital structure and makes adjustments to it in the light of changes in economic conditions and the risk characteristics of its activities. To maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Company may adjust the dividend payment to shareholders, return capital to shareholders or issue new shares. No changes were made in the objectives, policies or processes during the years ended 31 December 2009 and 31 December 2008.
The Company is obliged to keep its equity up to 50% of its share capital, as imposed by the Law on Companies of Republic of Lithuania.
The Company has externally imposed capital requirements from banks. They require that (equity – revaluation reserve) / (total assets) ratio is not less than 0.2. The management monitors that the Company is in line with the requirement. No other capital management tools are used.
AB Bankas Snoras has granted a loan of 1,448 t EUR for an investment project as to facility "Processing of agricultural goods and increase of surplus value – support by loans". The liability is guaranteed by UAB Ţemės Ūkio Paskolų Garantijų Fondas for a period of seven years.
There have been no other significant events subsequent to the end of the reporting period date that could materially affect the financial statements as at and for the year ended 31 December 2009.
AB Vilkyškių Pieninė Annual report for the year 2009
After the detrimental year 2008 during which the Company experienced reduce in raw material prices, a significant decrease in production volumes, management and administrative costs, and after changing part of markets, the consolidated profit of AB Vilkyškių Pieninė group for 2009 amounted to 6,7 million LTL, compared to the loss amounted to 12 million LTL earned in 2008.
The number of employees of the Company was increasing and at the end of 2009 reached 735:
During the economic slowdown, The Company searched for new markets and is focusing on production of products with higher added value. In 2009 the Company entered the markets of the new EU member states and Israel. The nearest goal is to equip the new premises for storage-ripining of cheese, creation of a more convenient packing of goods for final user, activation of labour in an independent market, strengthening of sales activity, formation of marketing division, development of fresh dairy products. Furthermore, the Company will purposefully continue with creation of trademarks of the Company and of separate products and their strengthening both, in the Lithuanian and foreign markets, development of product assortment and introduction of new exclusive types of cheese and dessert dairy products.
Due to economical situation, prices of dairy products in 2008 reached historical depression. Seeking to mitigate the situation, the European Commission redeemed export subsidies for certain dairy products. The determined subsidy amount for export of cheese amounted approximately to 200 EUR/ton. Also, purchases were started to intervention warehouses in Europe accumulating 257 thousand tons of thin milk flour, 76 thousand tons of butter.
Decrease in production of milk, actions of the EU institutions and promotion of interventional purchases offsetted the supply and demand. Moreover, currently stable prices and an increasing demand for goods demonstrate the start of stability period and the first signs of recovery. It may be said that milk processing is one of the branches of food industry which recovers first.
The Company expects that in 2010 profit will be in the same level as in 2009, and activities will require promt reaction to changes in the market, and expansion of variety of goods as well as optimisation of production and administrative costs.
Gintaras Bertašius
The annual report has been prepared for the year 2009.
| Name of the Issue | Public Company Vilkyškių Pieninė (hereinafter – the Company or the Issuer) |
|---|---|
| Autorised capital | 11,943,000 LTL |
| Registered office | Vilkyškiai, Pagėgiai municipality |
| Telephone | 8-441 55330 |
| Fax | 8-441 55242 |
| [email protected] | |
| Legal-organisational form | Public Company |
| Registration date and place | 10 May 1993 |
| Re-registration date and place | 30 December 2005 State Enterprise Center of Registers Taurage branch |
| Registration No. | 060018 |
| Code in the Register of Enterprises | 277160980 |
| Internet website | http://www.cheese.lt; http://www.suris.lt |
Core business of Vilkyskiu pienine AB is the production of cheese.
The Company also produces scalded cream and processes whey.
Vilkyskiu pienine AB has entered into the contract of service with Financial Broker Company Orion Securities UAB (address: A. Tumeno g. 4, B korp., LT-01109, Vilnius) on the record of shareholders and securities of Vilkyskiu pienine AB.
Trading in ordinary registered shares of Vilkyskiu pienine AB on Vilnius Stock Exchange:
| Period | Price (Lt) | Apyvarta (Lt) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| highest | lowest | highest | lowest | |
| 2006.05.17 - 2006.09.31 | 5,60 | 4,60 | 647.808 | 0,00 |
| 2006.10.01 - 2006.12.31 | 5,30 | 4,76 | 360.722 | 0,00 |
| 2007.01.01 - 2007.03.31 | 5,82 | 5,20 | 126.233 | 0,00 |
| 2007.04.01 - 2007.06.30 | 5,70 | 5,01 | 380.555 | 0,00 |
| 2007.07.01 - 2007.09.30 | 6,50 | 4,80 | 3.621.100 | 0,00 |
| 2007.10.01 - 2007.12.31 | 6,70 | 5,75 | 637.638 | 0,00 |
| 2008.01.01 - 2008.03.31 | 6,40 | 5,00 | 1.507.303 | 0,00 |
| 2008.04.01 - 2008.06.30 | 5,52 | 4,51 | 237.964 | 0,00 |
| 2008.07.01 - 2008.09.30 | 4,75 | 2,05 | 324.605 | 0,00 |
| 2008.10.01 - 2008.12.31 | 2,50 | 0,52 | 69.650 | 0,00 |
| 2009.01.01 - 2009.03.31 | 0,79 | 0,52 | 241.806 | 0,00 |
| 2009.04.01 - 2009.06.30 | 1,69 | 0,60 | 83.134 | 0,00 |
| 2009.07.01 - 2009.09.30 | 2,86 | 1,25 | 557.512 | 0,00 |
| 2009.10.01 - 2009.12.31 | 2,75 | 2,27 | 66.144 | 0,00 |
The activity of AB Vilkyškių Pieninė is based on the Lithuanian legislation, resolutions of the Government and legal acts regulating the companies" activities, as well as on the Law on Securities Market of the Republic of Lithuania and the Company"s Articles of Association.
The history of Vilkyskiai dairy was renewed on the 10th of May 1993 when public company Vilkyskiu pienine was established in the dairy premise, which was build in 1934. The old dairy had implemented its production till 1985. During the period of dairy"s closure all equipment were disassembled. The buildings were privatized and the owners of the dairy brought the first machinery from Eastern Germany where the restructurization of milk industry took place at that time.
The company had no initial capital. The company started operating as the owners of the company purchased the buildings. The company borrowed funds from the banks to finance the working capital needs.
In 1993 – 1995 the water tower, boiler-house and separation workshop were rebuilt. Since then the company started separating milk and cheese workshop started operating. The company started producing fat-low fermented cheese Peptatas. Butter production workshop was launched.
Afterwards the development of the company has accelerated. In 1997 the cheese workshop of the company started producing Tilsit type fermented cheese and in February 1998 Gouda type fermented cheese.
In 1997 LTL 2,87 million were invested into the company, LTL 0,5 million of which were used for the repair of the company. The company built the following: a modern boiler-house of Danish company BWE, a modern freezing chamber of Dutch company, where 400 tones of production can be stocked and warehoused, and a substation. The company also installed a computer network;
In 1998 nearly LTL 1,5 million were invested into motor transport, buildings, milk refrigerators, production equipment, new cheese workshop and other non-current assets;
In 1999 nearly LTL 8,5 million were invested. Almost all investment was used for the implementation of the project of new cheese production workshop ("Tetra Pak Tebel").
In the same year the company started producing fermented cheese "Zemaiciu", butter blend "Saules vaises" and fermented cheese "Tilziukas" with spice additives. That cheese won the golden medal at the international exhibition AgroBalt"1999 and became Lithuanian product of the year.
In 2000 the company started producing fermented cheese of "Maasdam" type. In 2001 cheese "Maasdam" won the golden medal at the international exhibition "AgroBalt". Moreover, in 2000-2001 attractive inexpensive fermented cheeses "Kursiukas", "Taupa" and "Sumustiniu" were offered to the consumers. During the period of
fourteen years of company"s operation, the company has created entire necessary service infrastructure (mechanical workshop, automobile centre (50 automobiles), milk freezing equipment, zone of raw material purchase), has changed or additionally bought all the equipment of the dairy, has built new workshops.
In 2000 LTL 3,84 million were invested into the construction of new workshops and into the major repairs. The company finished installing new fully computerized and automated technological line of cheese production, the installation of which provided the company with the possibility to produce western standards corresponding production and to export it to the European Union.
In May of the same year the company received Export Licence to the European Union;
In June 2001 the company acquired Taurage workshop form Mazeikiai subsidiary of Pieno zvaigzdes AB. Taurage workshop is situated about 20 km form Vilkyskiai town. This workshop was built in 1965 as a creamery and it corresponds with all raised requirements. The workshop is consisted of milk collection division, milk separation division, two cheese workshops, ripening workshop, prewrap workshop, mechanical workshop, automobile centre for the transportation of milk, raw milk zone as well as all other necessary service infrastructure – refrigeration, steam and air.
The company started building ripening workshop and cleaning equipment.
In the end of the year 2001 the company started producing mould cheese in Taurage workshop.
In 2003 the company reconstructed freezing chamber.
In 2004 the company carried out roof reconstruction and repair of buildings.
In 2003 -2004 the company additional invested in the infrastructure of milk production. The company built new stations of milk purchase and bought modern transport for milk transportation.
In 2004 the company built new modern waster water treatment plant of Dutch company "New Water Technology", which corresponds with the EU requirements. In the same year the company invested in the equipment of cheese packing and wrapping.
Ammonia freezing compressor was reconstructed.
In 2005 the company reconstructed the boiler-house of Taurage workshop by changing the type of fuel.
On 22 February 2006 the Minister of Agriculture signed an enactment, based on which AB Vilkyškių Pienine received a financial support of up to LTL 3,45 million from the EU structural funds for realisation of the Project "Realisation of the EU requirements and modernisation of production".
The first stage of the Project – modernisation of the cheese production technologies – was completed in 2006. During the process of modernisation, which lasted for more than half of the year, the workshop of AB Vilkyškių Pienine undergwent significant development works: installation of two new cheese production facilities, three new pressing lines and buffer capacity, a new technological line washing station. Furthermore, the company automated the cheese salting workshop as well as the cheese loading/unloading process. Upon completion of the mentioned modernisation, the maximum production capacities of the Company increased from 10 to 14 thousand tons of cheese per year.
In January 2006 the Issuer acquired 80.25 percent of Modest AB shares. According to the decision No. 1S-3 made by the Competition Board on 12/11/2006, the Issuer has a right to acquire up to 100 percent of Modest AB shares.
As of 17 May 2006, 9,353,000 ordinary shares of AB Vilkyškių Pieninė are listed in the Current Trading List on the Vilnius Stock Exchange. As of 1 January 2008 the shares are listed on the Official List of the Vilnius Stock Exchange.
In June 2007 the whey processing workshop of Vilkyskiu pienine AB started operating. The total value of the mentioned workshop of Vilkyskiu pienine AB is more than LTL 8 million. Vilkyskiu pienine AB received the support of LTL 3,45 million from the European Union Structural Funds for the modernization of cheese production workshop and whey processing project. The first portion of LTL 1,2 million was received in 2007, the remaining funds shall be received by the middle of 2009. Investments provided the company with possibility to increase far better the effectiveness of production and production quality control, moreover, it allowed effective reduction of waste. Until present, the Company has not carried out processing of whay. The new whay processing workshop is almost fully automated and has only two employees.
In 2008 Vilkyskiai boiler-house was reconstructed and the company started building cheese ripening workshop.
In April of 2008 Vilkyškių pieninė AB finally finished the transaction of the acquisition of Kelmes pienine AB and took an ownership to 99.09 percent of company"s shares. The Group of Vilkyskiai now consists of four companies: Vilkyskiu pienine AB, Modest AB, Kelmes pienine AB and Kelmes pieno centras UAB.
The general shareholders meeting of AB Modest, which took place on 7 July 2009 took a decision to increase the company"s authorized capital from LTL 128,408 up to LTL 692,710, by issuing 564,302 ordinary shares. The term for subscription agreements with shareholders ended on 25 July 2009. In total 488,710 shares were subscribed. According to the decision of the general shareholders meeting, if not all the shares are subscribed during the period given for subscription, the share capital is increased by the total nominal value of the subscribed shares. The company"s authorized capital was increased up to LTL 617,118.
The main activity of the Issuer is the production of fermented cheese, processing of whey.
The whole assortment of goods of AB Vilkyškių Pieninė comprises even 11 types of cheese having 56 different names of products.
Cheeses are produced according to the old Lithuanian ("Tilze" – Tilsit type cheese), worldwide ("Maasdam", "Gouda", "Edam") and original ("Prusija" – "Žalgiris") recipes. Cheeses "Tilziukas" with spice additives (in 1999) and "Maasdam" (in 2001) won gold medals of the best product of the year at the international exhibition "AgroBalt".
After the investment in the automation of production in 2006, the productive capacity of the Issuer in Vilkyskiai workshop (excluding Modest AB) increased up to 31 tone of cheese per twenty four hours. Taurage workshop is capable to produce 10 tones of cheese per twenty four hours. However, maximum productive capacity is limited by the lack of raw milk in winter season (in winter the amount of purchased milk is several times lower that in summer).
Tables bellow summarizes key indicators of production and trade volumes of the Issuer.
| Purchase of raw milk (recalculated into base fatness) |
2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Purchased milk, in tons | 94,852 | 122,016 | 101,589 | 123,016 | 144,941 |
| Purchased milk, in thousand LTL |
56,180 | 73,134 | 73,153 | 84,276 | 74,062 |
| Price of purchased milk, in LTL/t |
592.3 | 599.4 | 720.1 | 685.1 | 511.0 |
Within the period of last five years the distribution of production of Vilkyskiu pienine AB according to product type was as follows:
| Amount of produced products, expressed in tons |
2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fermented cheese | 8,293 | 10,204 | 8,120 | 8,473 | 7,811 |
| Cream | 2,090 | 4,831 | 5,499 | 5,027 | 5,637 |
| Whey concentrate | 4,436 | 17,719 | 23,874 | ||
| Whey flour | 2,817 | 1,586 | 611 |
Within the period of last five years the specification of sold production of Vilkyskiu pienine AB according to product type was as follows:
| Amount of sold products, expressed in tons |
2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fermented cheese | 7,968 | 9,471 | 8,443 | 9,032 | 8,827 |
| Cream | 2,090 | 4,831 | 5,564 | 5,060 | 5,912 |
| Whey concentrate | 4,436 | 17,719 | 23,874 | ||
| Whey flour | 1,419 | 2,510 | 1,337 |
Income from sale of production during 5 years period as per type of product:
| Income from sold production, expressed in LTL thousand |
2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fermented cheese | 71, 391 | 86,491 | 84,061 | 93,425 | 74,183 |
| Cream | 8,893 | 19,454 | 32,436 | 20,288 | 24,288 |
| Whey concentrate | 1,499 | 936 | 2,236 | ||
| Whey flour | 4,776 | 3,617 | 2,037 | ||
| Other income | 3,138 | 2,105 | 9,258 | 27,139 | 43,000 |
| Total income | 91,709 | 111,552 | 132,030 | 145,405 | 145,744 |
Distribution of revenue of AB Vilkyškių Pieninė for the last 5 years per regions:
| Market | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| European Union | 56,863 | 63,559 | 69,594 | 60,746 | 59,780 |
| Lithuania | 28,718 | 34,713 | 48,123 | 62,854 | 68,476 |
| Russia | 5,148 | 17,310 | 14,279 | 20,630 | 15,775 |
| Other countries | 980 | 137 | 34 | 1,175 | 1,713 |
| Total | 91,709 | 115,719 | 132,030 | 145,405 | 145,744 |
Sales during 2005 – 2009 per geographical segments, in thousand LTL
Revenue per geographical segments, in thousand LTL
Vilkyskiu pienine AB sells its production in Russian market by concluding long-term trade contracts. In the countries of the EU the major part of the production is sold on the basis of short-term trade contracts. In Lithuanian market validation period of contracts varies, but it is not shorter than one year.
The main raw material used for the production of products of Vilkyskiu pienine AB is raw cow milk. The major suppliers of milk are small and big farmers, agricultural companies and other companies of milk purchase. Vilkyskiu pienine AB usually purchases milk on the basis of typical milk purchase contracts, prepared by Vilkyskiu pienine AB itself. Contacts with milk suppliers are concluded for a period of one year or for a longer period.
The company purchases other raw materials mostly in Lithuania. The amount of raw material purchased form foreign countries is small. The company usually purchases equipment form foreign countries. Contracts usually are concluded for a period of one year. However, the company performs the accidental transactions as well.
Sometimes Vilkyskiu pienine AB purchases raw milk form its direct competitors in Lithuania, including Rokiskio suris AB and Pieno zvaigzdes AB, Zemaitijos pienas.
The statement of changes in non-current assets of AB Vilkyškių Pieninė is presented in the annual financial statements.
AB Vilkyškių Pieninė owns the following real estate turimas:
| Type of buildings | Area, sq. m |
|---|---|
| Main buildings: | |
| 1. Production-administrative building | 1884,72 kv. m |
| 2. Cheese production workshop | 373,1 kv.m |
| 3. Cheese ripening workshop | 1855,72 kv.m. |
| 4. Cheese salting workshop | 492,57 kv.m. |
| 5. Boiler-house building | 48,4 kv.m |
| 6. Substation building | 57,2 kv.m |
| 7. Mechanical control building (cleaning equipment) | 121,75 kv.m |
| 8. Freezing chamber | 406,15 kv.m. |
| 9. Whey workshop | 169 kv.m |
| Main buildings in Taurage: | |
| 1. Administration building | 779,02 kv.m |
| 2Production building | 2665,81 kv.m |
| 3. Concrete storehouse | 500,35 kv.m |
| 4. Mechanical workshop | 721,49 kv.m |
| 5. Transformation substation | 83 kv.m |
| 6. Freezing station | 861,54 kv.m |
| Building of Erzvilkas dairy | 154,80 kv.m |
The major risk factors related to the activity Vilkyskiu pienine AB are as follows:
The main Company"s activity is milk processing (production of fermented cheese). The main factors creating business risk are possible changes in the raw material and product markets, as well as legal, political, technological and social changes, which are directly or indirectly related to the business of Vilkyskiu pienine AB and which are likely to affect Company"s cash flows and operating results.
The Company is specializing in the production of cheese. The largest part of its income is received from the sale of cheese and cheese products. Due to this reason company"s income and profit is sensitive to negatives changes in demand and (or) in cheese prices in the market (market risk). The price of cheese can also be negatively affected by the competition in the international and in local cheese market.
The main raw material of the company is cow milk. The amount of milk sold to the milk producers of the European Union for processing is limited by the national milk quotas. The limitation of raw material supply may influence the lack of raw material and the increase of raw material prices. These changes can negatively affect Company"s cash flows and operating results.
Production of fermented cheese is a time consuming process which can take from 1 to 3 months. Such production particularity does not allow reacting quickly to rapid changes in the cheese market and this can negatively affect Company"s cash flows and operating results.
Company"s credit risk is related to receivable amounts of trade. The risk that business partners would not meet their financial obligations is controlled by established procedures of control. Credit risk, related to assets held in banks, is limited because the Company works only with the largest Lithuanian banks (mainly with AB SEB Bankas). As at 31 December 2009 the total liabilities and the total assets ratio was 0.62. Interest on all major loans are related to EUR LIBOR. The balance of financial liabilities of the Company amounted to LTL 40,886 as at 31 December 2009. The loans are denominated in EUR. Repayment of loans is carried out as to time Schedule. The Company does not have any overdue payments.
Foreign exchange risk. Operations with foreign currency are evaluated in LTL according to the exchange rate of operation date. Cash and liabilities denominated in foreign currency are evaluated in LTL applying exchange rate of the balance sheet formation date. Profit or loss from the currency exchange fluctuation is accounted in the income statement. The main part of Company"s income is received in EUR. The Company does not carry out such foreign currency transactions that could significantly affect Company"s financial results due to exchange rate fluctuation.
Agricultural sector (including milk production) is highly regulated in the countries of the European Union. A price level of raw milk is regulated through limitation of its supply for processing and consuming, using interventional purchases of milk products and applying import duties for dairy products imported form non-EU countries, export subsidies for dairy products exported to non-EU countries, and invoking other interventional means. The World Trade Organization and other organizations, which support free trade, incite to reduce the level of regulation in the agricultural sector of the EU. The liberalization of milk sector can reduce price of raw milk and dairy products, reduce export subsidies of dairy products, increase import of dairy products, and increase competition in the market of dairy products among non-EU countries. These changes can negatively affect Company"s cash flows and operating results.
Vilkyskiu pienine AB has not faced with such termination or reduction of production within the last 2 years.
In 2006 the Issuer invested LTL 3,487.6 thousand in the modernization of cheese workshop, LTL 2,927 thousand of which were borrowed, and LTL 560,6 thousand were own funds.
In 2007 Vilkyskiu pienine AB invested about LTL 7 million in whey processing workshop, 1,3 million litas in milk collection equipment and LTL 0,5 million in packaging and vacuum equipment.
In 2008 Vilkyskiai boiler-house was reconstructed and the company started building cheese ripening workshop.
In 2009 there were no investments exceeding 10 % of the Issuer"s authorised capital.
On the 8th of May 2000 the company received Export Licence to the European Union which provided the company with the right to export its production to the European Union. The company has introduced quality management programme (Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points System).
On the 14th of October 2004 an inspection due to the conformity with the requirements and certification of production to Russian market was carried out by the Russian National Veterinary Inspectorate.
On the 18th of May 2004 Taurage workshop of Vilkyskiu pienine AB was granted a EU veterinary certificate.
The company is constantly advised on the issues of product certification in Russia by O. B. Jarymova and L. N. Matiusheva (O.Б. Ярымова, Л.Н. Матюшева), who work in Kaliningrad Centre of Standardization, Metrology and Certification. The analysis of technological process and production shows whether the company works in compliance with rules, standards and requirements and whether the production produced by the company is safe.
In 2007 the main evaluation has been carried out in Vilkyskiu pienine AB in order to receive ISO Certificates of Quality Management and Food Safety Management. These certificates were presented in January 2008.
ISO 9001 Standard of Quality Management specifies requirements for quality management systems, including documentation requirements and requirements for processes of planning, management of recourses, product realization, measurement, analysis and improvement. This certificate demonstrates that a company is capable of managing and improving the quality of its supplied products and services, and its production meets with requirements of customers and the law.
ISO 22000 Standard of Food Safety Management System demonstrates that food safety risk is identified, measured and controlled in the entire food management chain of Vilkyskiu pienine AB. This current certificate aims at ensuring food safety within the entire chain of food production and supply in order to ensure that food is safe at the time of human consumption. This standard is applied to all types of organizations within the food chain, i.e. for producers of food and food packages.
In 2009 the Company underwent ISO audits which stated the Company complies with the requirements of the standards ISO 9001:2000 and ISO 22000:2000.
On 18 September 2009 AB Vilkyškių Pieninė was visited by experts of the Russian Federal Veterinarian and Phytosanitarian Service who performed a review of the Company. During the review the expects assessed the sanitary state of the Company as well as compliance of production, auxiliary, riping and storing premises with the Russian norms and requirements. The audit included examination of the Company"s documentation from raw materials, additions and other consumable materials to product realisation.
The mentioned audit of the the Russian Federal Veterinarian and Phytosanitarian Service did not result in any discrepancies. The experts concluded that the Company"s operations are carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Russian Federal Veterinarian and Phytosanitarian Service.
The processes of litigation and arbitration are not proceeded in Vilkyskiu pienine AB.
Basing on the calculation of Vilkyskiu pienine AB, the company holds about 17 percent of Lithuania"s cheese market, i.e. it ranks fourth among the producers, after Rokiškio Sūris AB, Pieno Ţvaigţdės AB and Ţemaitijos Pienas AB.
In foreign markets Vilkyskiu pienine AB has to compete with local producers, whose advantage is lower transportation expenses. However, Vilkyskiu pienine AB compensate this fact by offering higher value added cheese assortment.
Vilkyskiu pienine AB has no preferred shares, thus dividends are paid only for ordinary registered shares.
| Dividends | 2005 (for 2004) |
2006 (for 2005) |
2007 (for 2006) |
2008 (for 2007) |
2009 (for 2008) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividends (LTL) | 1,177,000 | 2,500,000 | 2,057,660 | 2,030,310 | 0 |
| Dividends per share (LTL) | 0.13 | 0.27 | 0.22 | 0.17 | 0 |
| Number of shares | 99,500 | 9,353,000 | 9,353,000 | 11,943,000 | 11,943,000 |
Payment of dividends within the last 5 years is as follows:
| Type of shares | Number of securities |
Nominal value (in LTL) |
Total nominal value (in LTL) |
ISIN code |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ordinary registered shares |
11,943,000 | 1.00 | 11 943 000 | LT0000127508 |
There are no restrictions to transfer the securities.
As of 31 December 2009 the total number of shareholders was 734. The following were the major shareholders who had an ownership or held more than 5 per cent of Company"s share capital:
| Shareholder | Shares | Nominal value in LTL |
Total value in LTL |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gintaras Bertašius | 6,016,506 | 1 | 6,016,506 |
| Linas Strėlis | 1,015,000 | 1 | 1,015,000 |
| SEB clients | 2,483,577 | 1 | 2,483,577 |
| UAB FMĮ Orion Securities clients | 1,747,644 | 1 | 1,747,644 |
| Non-controlling interest | 680,273 | 1 | 680,273 |
| Capital in total | 11,943,000 | 1 | 11,943,000 |
Securities issued by the Company have been included into the Current Trade List of Vilnius Stock Exchange since the 17th of May 2006. ISIN code of securities is LT0000127508.
In December 2007, as the company submitted the request to Vilnius Stock Exchange, company"s securities were allowed to be included in the Official Trade List form since 1st of January.
Name of securities – ordinary registered shares of AB Vilkyškių Pieninė. The number of securities: 11,943,000 units. Nominal value of one share is LTL 1.00.
| Period | Price, Lt | Turnover, thousand Lt | Total turnover | Capitali | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| From | To | Max. | Min. | Last | Max. | Min. | Last | Units | LTL | sation, LTL |
| 2006 05 17 | 2007 04 20 | 5,82 | 4,60 | 5,65 | 647,8 | 0 | 0 | 531 008 | 2 821 161,1 | 52 844 450 |
| 2007 01 01 | 2007 03 31 | 5,82 | 5,20 | 5,70 | 126,2 | 0 | 0 | 56 635 | 312 038,6 | 53 312 100 |
| 2007 04 01 | 2007 06 30 | 5,70 | 5,01 | 5,20 | 380,5 | 0 | 20,4 | 167 957 | 930 576,2 | 48 635 600 |
| 2007 07 01 | 2007 09 30 | 6,50 | 4,80 | 5,90 | 3 621,1 | 0 | 25,6 | 1 647 863 | 9 163 708,7 | 55 182 700 |
| 2007 10 01 | 2007 12 31 | 6,70 | 5,75 | 6,20 | 637,6 | 0 | 1,8 | 455 408 | 2 762 468,4 | 57 988 600 |
| 2008.01.01 | 2008.03.31 | 6,40 | 5,00 | 5,30 | 1 507,3 | 0 | 12,3 | 693 973 | 3 848 098,2 | 49 570 900 |
| 2008.04.01 | 2008.06.30 | 5,52 | 4,51 | 4,70 | 237,9 | 0 | 15,5 | 244 910 | 1 209 573,1 | 56 132 100 |
| 2008.07.01 | 2008.09.30 | 4,75 | 2,05 | 2,26 | 324,6 | 0 | 3,1 | 245 700 | 912 782,9 | 26 991 180 |
| 2008.10.01 | 2008.12.31 | 2,50 | 0,52 | 0,60 | 69,6 | 0 | 0 | 731 354 | 696 019,0 | 7 165 800 |
| 2009.01.01 | 2009.03.31 | 0,79 | 0,52 | 0,63 | 241,8 | 0 | 0,5 | 1 040 145 | 660 301,9 | 7 524 090 |
| 2009.04.01 | 2009.06.30 | 1,69 | 0,60 | 1,35 | 83,1 | 0 | 2,6 | 531 304 | 566 948,8 | 16 123 050 |
| 2009.07.01 | 2009.09.30 | 2,86 | 1,25 | 2,32 | 557,5 | 0 | 0 | 1 024 019 | 1 954 451,2 | 27 707 760 |
| 2009.10.01 | 2009.12.31 | 2,75 | 2,27 | 2,40 | 66,1 | 0 | 4,8 | 196 588 | 486 477,7 | 28 663 200 |
There are no shares which would provide the shareholders with special rights of control.
There are no restrictions of voting right.
There are no interagreements of shareholders which are known to the Issuer and due to which transfer of securities and voting right may be restricted.
The Issuer"s Articles of Association can be amended during the General Meeting of the Shareholders. Decisions on the amendments of the Articles of Association are considered to be taken if 2/3 of votes of all shareholders are received.
| Name, surname | Education, specialty |
Position held in the Issuer | Start of tenure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gintaras Bertašius |
Higher education, engineer - mechanic |
Chairman of the Board, Director General |
30/01/2006 |
| Sigitas Trijonis | Higher education, engineer - mechanic |
Member of the Board, Technical Director |
30/01/2006 |
| Rimantas Jancevičius |
Further education, zoo - technician |
Member of the Board, Stock Director |
30/01/2006 |
| Vilija Milaševičiutė |
Higher education, Finance and credit |
Member of the Board, Finance Director |
30/04/2009 |
| Andrej Cyba | Higher education | Member of the Board | 18/04/2008 |
| Linas Strėlis | Higher education | Member of the Board | 18/04/2008 |
| Name, surname | Education, speciality | Position held in the Issuer | Beginning of service* |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gintaras Bertašius |
Higher education, engineer - mechanic |
Chairman of the Management Board, Director General |
2006 01 01** |
| Vilija Milaševičiutė |
Higher education, Finance and credit |
Member of the Board, Finance Director |
2000 05 01 |
| Rimantas Jancevičius |
Further education, zoo - technician |
Member of the Management Board, Stock Director |
1996 01 02 |
| Sigitas Trijonis | Higher education, engineer - mechanic |
Member of the Management Board, Technical Director |
1993 09 01 |
| Arvydas Zaranka | Further education, Technologist of dairy products |
Production Director | 1995 07 30 |
| Arminas Lunia | Higher education, Chemist | Sales Director | 2007 08 20 |
| Rita Juodikienė | Higher education, Engineer of Information Management |
Head of Purchase Department |
2002 09 23 |
| Mindaugas Dūda | Higher education, IT engineer | Head of IT Department | 2008 08 01 |
| Rasa Trybienė | Higher education, Psylologist |
Head of Personnel | 2009 05 22 |
| Lina Genienė | Higher, Economist of International Trade |
Chief Accountant | 2008 09 29 |
| Sigita Montvilaitė | Further, Accounting | Deputy Chief Accountant | 2006 12 14 |
| Ligita Pudžiuvelytė |
Higher education, Economist |
Senior Economist | 2004 05 20 |
| Ina Baltrušienė | Higher education, Lawyer | Lawyer | 2007 10 08 |
* None of the labour contracts with the members of the Management Bodies is terminable.
** He has been appointed newly after the reorganization of the Issuer into public company, despite he has been working as a Director of the Issuer since 10/05/1993.
| Name | Surname | Position held | Other information - shares, participation in the activity of other companies |
Number of shares owned in Vilkyskiu pienine AB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gintaras | Bertašius | Director General, Chairman of the Management Board |
Shareholder of Silgaliai UKB (1 share), Chairman of the Management Board of Modest AB, Chairman of the Management Board of Kelmes pienine AB |
6,016,506 |
| Sigitas | Trijonis | Technical Director, member of the Management Board |
has no other shares, does not participate in the activity of other companies |
425,538 |
| Rimantas | Jancevičius | Stock Director, member of the Management Board |
has no other shares, does not participate in the activity of other companies |
2,054 |
| Vilija | Milaševičiutė | Finance Director, member of the Management Board |
Member of the Management Board of AB Modest, has no other shares |
7,718 |
| Arvydas | Zaranka | Production Director |
Member of the Management Board of Modest AB, Member of the Management Board of Kelmes pienine AB, has no other shares |
1,923 |
| Lina | Genienė | Chief Accountant | has no other shares, does not participate in the activity of other companies |
- |
| Arminas | Lunia | Sales Director | has no other shares, does not participate in the activity of other companies |
- |
| Andrej | Cyba | member of the Management Board |
Member of the Management Board of "Invalda" |
- |
| Linas | Strėlis | member of the Management Board |
1,015,000 |
As of 31 December 2009 there were 430 employees at AB Vilkyškių Pieninė.
| Average | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Staff group | Number of employees |
Higher | Further | Secondary | Incomplete secondary |
monthly salary (LTL) |
| Executives | 6 | 4 | 2 | 8,509 | ||
| Key specialists | 40 | 17 | 15 | 8 | 2,979 | |
| Specialists | 39 | 13 | 21 | 5 | 2,119 | |
| Workers | 345 | 7 | 183 | 125 | 30 | 1,358 |
| 430 | 41 | 221 | 138 | 30 | 1,594 |
| Average | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Staff group | Number of employees |
Higher | Further | Secondary | Incomplete secondary |
monthly salary (LTL) |
| Executives | 6 | 4 | 2 | 9,717 | ||
| Key specialists | 40 | 17 | 15 | 8 | 3,336 | |
| Specialists | 37 | 12 | 20 | 5 | 2,373 | |
| Workers | 344 | 7 | 183 | 125 | 29 | 1,521 |
| 427 | 40 | 220 | 138 | 29 | 1,768 |
As of 31 December 2008 there were 427 employees at AB Vilkyškių Pieninė.
There are no any agreements the parties of which is the Issuer and which would enter into force on the change of Issuer"s control.
The general shareholders meeting of AB Vilkyškių Pieninė, held on 30 April 2009, was acquainted with the Company"s annual report for 2008, an independent auditor"s report on the Company"s financial statements for 2008, approved the Company"s financial statements for 2008, recalled the Board member Ramūnas Šniepis and elected a new member Vilija Milaševičiūtė. Furthermore, regulations of the activity and staff of the audit committee were approved. Alius Jakubėlis was elected as an independent member of the audit committee. The Board is authorized to determine the remuneration for activity of the independent member of the Board. The Chief Executive Officer of the Company is authorized to sign a contract with the independent member of the Board. Ligita Pudţiuvelytė and Birutė Bazilienė are elected as members of the audit committee.
The general shareholders meeting of AB Modest, held on 7 July 2009, took a decision to increase the Company"s share capital from 128,408 LTL to 692,710 LTL, by issuing 564,302 ordinary shares. The deadline for signing a shares subscription agreement ended on 25 July 2009. The total amount of subscribed shares amounted to 488,710, and based on the shareholders decision, if not all the shares are subscribed during the determined period, the share capital shall be increased by the total nominal value of the subscribed shares. The Company"s share capital was increased up to 617,118 LTL.
Since 1 January 2010, the legal status of the subsidiary UAB Modest has changed into a stock company.
30. Announcement of Vilkyskiu pienine AB concerning disclosure of compliance with the Governance Code of the companies whose securities were traded on a regulated market in 2009
The public company "Vilkyskiu pienine", following Article 21 paragraph 3 of the Law on Securities of the Republic of Lithuania and item 20.5 of the Trading Rules of the Vilnius Stock Exchange, discloses its compliance with the Governance Code, approved by the VSE for the companies listed on the regulated market, and its specific provisions.
| PRINCIPLES/ RECOMMENDATIONS | YES/NO /NOT APPLICABLE |
COMMENTARY | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Principle I: Basic Provisions | ||||
| The overriding objective of a company should be to operate in common interests of all the shareholders by optimizing over time shareholder value. |
||||
| 1.1. A company should adopt and make public the company"s development strategy and objectives by clearly declaring how the company intends to meet the interests of its shareholders and optimize shareholder value. |
Yes | The Company constantly presents information related with the development strategy and with the optimization of shareholder value via the information system of the Stock Exchange, on its website (www.suris.lt/investuotojams/), and via agency BNS. |
||
| 1.2. All management bodies of a company should act in furtherance of the declared strategic objectives in view of the need to optimize shareholder value. |
Yes | All management bodies of the company act in furtherance of the declared strategic objectives. |
||
| 1.3. A company"s supervisory and management bodies should act in close co-operation in order to attain maximum benefit for the company and its shareholders. |
Yes | The company has set up the Management Board which acts for the interests of the company"s shareholders, is responsible for the strategic management of the company, supervises the activity of the chief executive officer of the company, organizes meetings of the Management Board and cooperates with the management bodies of the company. Nomination, remuneration and audit committees have been set up in the Company. |
||
| 1.4. A company"s supervisory and management bodies should ensure that the rights and interests of persons other than the company"s shareholders (e.g. employees, creditors, suppliers, clients, local community), participating in or connected with the company"s operation, are duly respected. |
Yes | The company acts in compliance with the provisions that are set in this clause. |
The corporate governance framework should ensure the strategic guidance of the company, the effective oversight of the company"s management bodies, an appropriate balance and distribution of functions between the company"s bodies, protection of the shareholders" interests.
| 2.1. Besides obligatory bodies provided for in the Law on Companies of the Republic of Lithuania – a general shareholders" meeting and the chief executive officer, it is |
No | The bodies of the company are a general shareholders" meeting, Management Board and chief executive officer (Director General). |
|---|---|---|
| recommended that a company should set up | The company does not set up a supervisory board as a | |
| both a collegial supervisory body and a | collegial management body. The Management Board is |
| collegial management body. The setting up of collegial bodies for supervision and management facilitates clear separation of management and supervisory functions in the company, accountability and control on the part of the chief executive officer, which, in its turn, facilitate a more efficient and transparent management process. |
responsible for the supervision of company"s activity and management. |
|
|---|---|---|
| 2.2. A collegial management body is responsible for the strategic management of the company and performs other key functions of corporate governance. A collegial supervisory body is responsible for the effective supervision of the company"s management bodies. |
Yes | The functions that are indicated in this recommendation are implemented by the Management Board. |
| 2.3. Where a company chooses to form only one collegial body, it is recommended that it should be a supervisory body, i.e. the supervisory board. In such a case, the supervisory board is responsible for the effective monitoring of the functions performed by the company"s chief executive officer. |
No | The company does not follow this recommendation, where a company chooses to form only one collegial body, as Management Board is the one collegial body. The company does not follow the Recommendation 2.3 of the Governance Code – at present the only collegial body of the company is a management body, not a supervisory one. The management body of the company implements the supervisory functions as well. |
| 2.4. The collegial supervisory body to be elected by the general shareholders" meeting should be set up and should act in the manner defined in Principles III and IV. Where a company should decide not to set up a collegial supervisory body but rather a collegial management body, i.e. the board, Principles III and IV should apply to the board as long as that does not contradict the essence and purpose of this body.1 |
Yes | Management Board ellects and recalls the chief executive officer, sets his remuneration, other working conditions, approves Staff Regulations, induces him and imposes penalties. |
| 2.5. Company"s management and supervisory bodies should comprise such number of board (executive directors) and supervisory (non executive directors) board members that no individual or small group of individuals can dominate decision-making on the part of these bodies.2 |
Yes | At present, in accordance with the Articles of Association, the Management Board of the company is composed of 6 members who are appointed for the period of four years. The number of members of the collegial body is sufficient to dominate decision-making. |
| 2.6. Non-executive directors or members of the supervisory board should be appointed for specified terms subject to individual re-election, at maximum intervals provided for in the |
Yes | In accordance with the Articles of Association, the members of the Management Board are appointed for the period of four years without limiting the number of their terms of office. |
1 Provisions of Principles III and IV are more applicable to those instances when the general shareholders" meeting elects the supervisory board, i.e. a body that is essentially formed to ensure oversight of the company"s board and the chief executive officer and to represent the company"s shareholders. However, in case the company does not form the supervisory board but rather the board, most of the recommendations set out in Principles III and IV become important and applicable to the board as well. Furthermore, it should be noted that certain recommendations, which are in their essence and nature applicable exclusively to the supervisory board, should not be applied to the board, as the competence and functions of these bodies according to the Law on Companies of the Republic of Lithuania (Official Gazette, 2003, No 123-5574) are different. For instance, item 3.1 of the Code concerning oversight of the management bodies applies to the extent it concerns the oversight of the chief executive officer of the company, but not of the board itself; item 4.1 of the Code concerning recommendations to the management bodies applies to the extent it relates to the provision of recommendations to the company"s chief executive officer; item 4.4 of the Code concerning independence of the collegial body elected by the general meeting from the company"s management bodies is applied to the extent it concerns independence from the chief executive officer.
2 Definitions "executive director" and "non-executive director" are used in cases when a company has only one collegial body.
| Lithuanian legislation with a view to ensuring necessary development of professional experience and sufficiently frequent reconfirmation of their status. A possibility to remove them should also be stipulated however this procedure should not be easier than the removal procedure for an executive director or a member of the management board. |
The Articles of Association provides the company with the possibility to withdraw the whole Management Board or any of its members. The withdrawal of a member of the Management Board should be based on the legislation. |
|
|---|---|---|
| 2.7. Chairman of the collegial body elected by the general shareholders" meeting may be a person whose current or past office constitutes no obstacle to conduct independent and impartial supervision. Where a company should decide not to set up a supervisory board but rather the board, it is recommended that the chairman of the board and chief executive officer of the company should be a different person. Former company"s chief executive officer should not be immediately nominated as the chairman of the collegial body elected by the general shareholders" meeting. When a company chooses to departure from these recommendations, it should furnish information on the measures it has taken to ensure impartiality of the supervision. |
No | The company does not follow the Recommendation 2.7 because the chairman of the Management Board is Director General of the Company. The independence of supervision is guaranteed by other five members of the Management Board. |
| Principle III: The order of the formation of a collegial body to be elected by a general shareholders" meeting | ||
| representation of minority shareholders, accountability of this monitoring of the company"s operation and its management bodies.3 |
The order of the formation a collegial body to be elected by a general shareholders" meeting should ensure body to the shareholders and objective |
|
| 3.1. The mechanism of the formation of a collegial body to be elected by a general shareholders" meeting (hereinafter in this Principle referred to as the "collegial body") should ensure objective and fair monitoring of the company"s management bodies as well as representation of minority shareholders. |
Yes | While electing the collegial body of the company, the shareholders may take the cognizance of comprehensive information about the candidates early enough before the meeting of the shareholders and during it as well. |
| 3.2. Names and surnames of the candidates to become members of a collegial body, information about their education, qualification, professional background, positions taken and potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed early enough before the general shareholders" meeting so that the shareholders would have sufficient time to make an informed voting decision. All factors affecting the candidate"s independence, the sample list of which is set out in Recommendation 3.7, should be also disclosed. The collegial body should |
Yes | The company follows all provisions that are indicated in this recommendation, moreover, the company could additionally mention the document (such as the operating regulation of that body), if any, which determines the specific order of data exchange among the member of that collegial body. The company accumulates and discloses the entire information about the members of collegial body, their professional education, qualification and conflicts of interest, following the order set out in these recommendations, i.e. via publicly announced periodical |
| also be informed on any subsequent changes in the provided information. The collegial body should, on yearly basis, collect data provided in this item on its members and disclose this in the company"s annual report. |
reports of the company. | |
| 3.3. Should a person be nominated for members | Yes | The company could comprehensively comment the |
3 Attention should be drawn to the fact that in the situation where the collegial body elected by the general shareholders" meeting is the board, it is natural that being a management body it should ensure oversight not of all management bodies of the company, but only of the single-person body of management, i.e. the company"s chief executive officer. This note shall apply in respect of item 3.1 as well.
| of a collegial body, such nomination should be followed by the disclosure of information on candidate"s particular competences relevant to his/her service on the collegial body. In order shareholders and investors are able to ascertain whether member"s competence is further relevant, the collegial body should, in its annual report, disclose the information on its composition and particular competences of individual members which are relevant to their service on the collegial body. |
implemented practice (for instance, prior to the announcement of company"s annual report to the shareholders, each member of collegial body informs the collegial body about the in-service trainings, relevant to their service on the collegial body, which she/he has attended within the last accounting year). During the meetings of the shareholders, curriculum vitae of candidates to become members of the Management Board are presented, which include such information as their education, professional background, etc. Information about the composition of the Management Board is set out in the reports of the company. |
|
|---|---|---|
| 3.4. In order to maintain a proper balance in terms of the current qualifications possessed by its members, the collegial body should determine its desired composition with regard to the company"s structure and activities, and have this periodically evaluated. The collegial body should ensure that it is composed of members who, as a whole, have the required diversity of knowledge, judgment and experience to complete their tasks properly. The members of the audit committee, collectively, should have a recent knowledge and relevant experience in the fields of finance, accounting and/or audit for the stock exchange listed companies. At least one of the members of the remuneration committee should have knowledge of and experience in the field of remuneration policy. |
Yes | The company follows the recommendations set out in this clause. The members of the Management Board of the company have required diversity of knowledge, judgment and experience to complete their tasks properly. The members of Audit Committee have relevant experience and a recent knowledge in the fields of accounting and audit. |
| 3.5. All new members of the collegial body should be offered a tailored program focused on introducing a member with his/her duties, corporate organization and activities. The collegial body should conduct an annual review to identify fields where its members need to update their skills and knowledge. |
Yes | Members of the Management Board constantly take part in various refresher courses and seminars where they are provided with the information about the essential changes in legislation that regulates the activity of the company. Moreover, in case of necessity, the members of the Management Board either individually or during the meetings of the Management Board are also informed about the other changes, which have an impact on the activity of the company. |
| 3.6. In order to ensure that all material conflicts of interest related with a member of the collegial body are resolved properly, the collegial body should comprise a sufficient4 number of independent5 members. |
No | The company does not follow the Recommendation 3.6 of the Governance Code as the company neither has defined the independence criteria of a member of the Management Board nor has discussed the content of "sufficiency" concept of independent members. |
| 3.7. A member of the collegial body should be considered to be independent only if he is free of any business, family or other relationship with the company, its controlling shareholder or the management of either, that creates a |
No | The company has not defined the independence criteria of a member of the Management Board. |
4 The Code does not provide for a concrete number of independent members to comprise a collegial body. Many codes in foreign countries fix a concrete number of independent members (e.g. at least 1/3 or 1/2 of the members of the collegial body) to comprise the collegial body. However, having regard to the novelty of the institution of independent members in Lithuania and potential problems in finding and electing a concrete number of independent members, the Code provides for a more flexible wording and allows the companies themselves to decide what number of independent members is sufficient. Of course, a larger number of independent members in a collegial body is encouraged and will constitute an example of more suitable corporate governance.
5 It is notable that in some companies all members of the collegial body may, due to a very small number of minority shareholders, be elected by the votes of the majority shareholder or a few major shareholders. But even a member of the collegial body elected by the majority shareholders may be considered independent if he/she meets the independence criteria set out in the Code.
| conflict of interest such as to impair his | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| judgment. Since all cases when member of the | ||||
| collegial body is likely to become dependent are | ||||
| impossible to list, moreover, relationships and | ||||
| circumstances associated with the |
||||
| determination of independence may vary |
||||
| amongst companies and the best practices of | ||||
| solving this problem are yet to evolve in the | ||||
| course of time, assessment of independence of a | ||||
| member of the collegial body should be based | ||||
| on the contents of the relationship and |
||||
| circumstances rather than their form. The key | ||||
| criteria for identifying whether a member of the | ||||
| collegial body can be considered to be |
||||
| independent are the following: | ||||
applicable The company has not defined the independence criteria of a member of the Management Board.
Not
| 7) He/she is not an executive director or member of the board in some other company where executive director of the company or member of the board (if a collegial body elected by the general shareholders" meeting is the supervisory board) is non-executive director or member of the supervisory board, he/she may not also have any other material relationships with executive directors of the company that arise from their participation in activities of other companies or bodies; 8) He/she has not been in the position of a member of the collegial body for over than 12 years; 9) He/she is not a close relative to an executive director or member of the board (if a collegial body elected by the general shareholders" meeting is the supervisory board) or to any person listed in above items 1 to 8. Close relative is considered to be a spouse (common-law spouse), children and parents. 3.8. The determination of what constitutes independence is fundamentally an issue for the collegial body itself to determine. The collegial body may decide that, despite a particular member meets all the criteria of independence laid down in this Code, he cannot be considered independent due to special personal or company-related circumstances. |
||
|---|---|---|
| 3.9. Necessary information on conclusions the collegial body has come to in its determination of whether a particular member of the body should be considered to be independent should be disclosed. When a person is nominated to become a member of the collegial body, the company should disclose whether it considers the person to be independent. When a particular member of the collegial body does not meet one or more criteria of independence set out in this Code, the company should disclose its reasons for nevertheless considering the member to be independent. In addition, the company should annually disclose which members of the collegial body it considers to be independent. |
No | The company has not implemented the practice of evaluation and disclosure of independence criteria of a member of the Management Board. |
| 3.10. When one or more criteria of independence set out in this Code has not been met throughout the year, the company should disclose its reasons for considering a particular member of the collegial body to be independent. To ensure accuracy of the information disclosed in relation with the independence of the members of the collegial body, the company should require independent members to have their independence periodically re-confirmed. |
No | The company has not implemented the practice of evaluation and disclosure of independence criteria of a member of the Management Board. |
| 3.11. In order to remunerate members of a collegial body for their work and participation |
Not applicable |
Members of the Management Board are not remunerated for their service on the Management Board (however, such |
| in the meetings of the collegial body, they may | possibility is set out in the Articles of Association). |
|---|---|
| be remunerated from the company"s funds.6. | |
| The general shareholders" meeting should |
|
| approve the amount of such remuneration. | |
The corporate governance framework should ensure proper and effective functioning of the collegial body elected by the general shareholders" meeting, and the powers granted to the collegial body should ensure effective monitoring7 of the company"s management bodies and protection of interests of all the company"s shareholders.
| 4.1. The collegial body elected by the general shareholders" meeting (hereinafter in this Principle referred to as the "collegial body") should ensure integrity and transparency of the company"s financial statements and the control system. The collegial body should issue recommendations to the company"s management bodies and monitor and control the company"s management performance.8 |
Yes | The Management Board ensures the integrity and transparency of the company"s financial statements and the control system, evaluates the project of company"s annual financial statements and the project of profit (loss) distribution and submits them to the general shareholders" meeting. |
|---|---|---|
| 4.2. Members of the collegial body should act in good faith, with care and responsibility for the benefit and in the interests of the company and its shareholders with due regard to the interests of employees and public welfare. Independent members of the collegial body should (a) under all circumstances maintain independence of their analysis, decision-making and actions (b) do not seek and accept any unjustified privileges that might compromise their independence, and (c) clearly express their objections should a member consider that decision of the collegial body is against the interests of the company. Should a collegial body have passed decisions independent member has serious doubts about, the member should make adequate conclusions. Should an independent member resign from his office, he should explain the reasons in a letter addressed to the collegial body or audit committee and, if necessary, respective company-not-pertaining body (institution). |
Yes | Basing on company"s data, the members of the Management Board act in good will with regard to the company, follow the interests of the company, not the interests of their own or of the third parties, act in conformity with the principles of fairness and prudence, under an obligation of confidentiality and with due responsibility, thus they aim at maintaining the independence of decision-making. |
| 4.3. Each member should devote sufficient time and attention to perform his duties as a member of the collegial body. Each member of the collegial body should limit other professional obligations of his (in particular any directorships held in other companies) in such a manner they do not interfere with proper performance of duties of a member of the collegial body. In the |
Yes | In the year 2009 the members of the Management Board held the meetings of the Management Board (each meeting had the proper quorum) and each member devoted sufficient time to perform her/his duties as a member of the Management Board. |
6It is notable that currently it is not yet completely clear, in what form members of the supervisory board or the board may be remunerated for their work in these bodies. The Law on Companies of the Republic of Lithuania (Official Gazette, 2003, No 123-5574) provides that members of the supervisory board or the board may be remunerated for their work in the supervisory board or the board by payment of annual bonuses (tantiems) in the manner prescribed by Article 59 of this Law, i.e. from the company"s profit. The current wording, contrary to the wording effective before 1 January 2004, eliminates the exclusive requirement that annual bonuses (tantiems) should be the only form of the company"s compensation to members of the supervisory board or the board. So it seems that the Law contains no prohibition to remunerate members of the supervisory board or the board for their work in other forms, besides bonuses, although this possibility is not expressly stated either. 7 See Footnote 3.
8 See Footnote 3. In the event the collegial body elected by the general shareholders" meeting is the board, it should provide recommendations to the company"s single-person body of management, i.e. the company"s chief executive officer.
| event a member of the collegial body should be present in less than a half9 of the meetings of the collegial body throughout the financial year of the company, shareholders of the company should be notified. |
||
|---|---|---|
| 4.4. Where decisions of a collegial body may have a different effect on the company"s shareholders, the collegial body should treat all shareholders impartially and fairly. It should ensure that shareholders are properly informed on the company"s affairs, strategies, risk management and resolution of conflicts of interest. The company should have a clearly established role of members of the collegial body when communicating with and committing to shareholders. |
Yes | The management bodies of the company, prior to making material decisions, discuss their impact on shareholders and seeking to ensure that all shareholders are properly informed on the company"s affairs, strategies, risk management, announce the main information about the company"s activity in the periodical reports. |
| 4.5. It is recommended that transactions (except insignificant ones due to their low value or concluded when carrying out routine operations in the company under usual conditions), concluded between the company and its shareholders, members of the supervisory or managing bodies or other natural or legal persons that exert or may exert influence on the company"s management should be subject to approval of the collegial body. The decision concerning approval of such transactions should be deemed adopted only provided the majority of the independent members of the collegial body voted for such a decision. |
Yes | The management bodies of the company enter into transactions following the legislation and approved Articles of Association, for the attainment of benefit and welfare to the company. |
| 4.6. The collegial body should be independent in passing decisions that are significant for the company"s operations and strategy. Taken separately, the collegial body should be independent of the company"s management bodies10. Members of the collegial body should act and pass decisions without an outside influence from the persons who have elected it. Companies should ensure that the collegial body and its committees are provided with sufficient administrative and financial resources to discharge their duties, including the right to obtain, in particular from employees of the company, all the necessary information or to seek independent legal, accounting or any other advice on issues pertaining to the competence of the collegial body and its committees. When using the services of a consultant with a view to obtaining information on market standards for remuneration systems, the remuneration committee should ensure that the consultant concerned does not at the same time advise the human resources department, executive directors or collegial management organs of the |
Yes | In all senses the Management Board makes decisions on the interest of the company. The Management Board of the company and its committees are provided with entire resources that are necessary to exercise their functions. Under the necessity, the employees of the company take part in the meetings of the Management Board and committees and present all the necessary information that is relevant to the issues under discussion. Remuneration committee ensures that consultants and specialists, who provides information on market standards for remuneration systems, do not at the same time advise the human resources departments of the company, members of executive and management bodies on the issues related with company. |
9 It is notable that companies can make this requirement more stringent and provide that shareholders should be informed about failure to participate at the meetings of the collegial body if, for instance, a member of the collegial body participated at less than 2/3 or 3/4 of the meetings. Such measures, which ensure active participation in the meetings of the collegial body, are encouraged and will constitute an example of more suitable corporate governance.
10 In the event the collegial body elected by the general shareholders" meeting is the board, the recommendation concerning its independence from the company"s management bodies applies to the extent it relates to the independence from the company"s chief executive officer.
| company concerned. | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4.7. Activities of the collegial body should be organized in a manner that independent members of the collegial body could have major influence in relevant areas where chances of occurrence of conflicts of interest are very high. Such areas to be considered as highly relevant are issues of nomination of company"s directors, determination of directors" remuneration and control and assessment of company"s audit. Therefore when the mentioned issues are attributable to the competence of the collegial body, it is recommended that the collegial body should establish nomination, remuneration, and audit committees11. Companies should ensure that the functions attributable to the nomination, remuneration, and audit committees are carried out. However they may decide to merge these functions and set up less than three committees. In such case a company should explain in detail reasons behind the selection of alternative approach and how the selected approach complies with the objectives set forth for the three different committees. Should the collegial body of the company comprise small number of members, the functions assigned to the three committees may be performed by the collegial body itself, provided that it meets composition requirements advocated for the committees and that adequate information is provided in this respect. In such case provisions of this Code relating to the committees of the collegial body (in particular with respect to their role, operation, and transparency) should apply, where relevant, to the collegial body as a whole. |
Yes | Vilkyskiu pienine AB has 2 committees: Nomination and Remuneration Committee and Audit Committee. The Management Board forms the Nomination and Remuneration Committee. General Meeting of Shareholders approves the members and the regulations of activity of the Audit committee. |
| 4.8. The key objective of the committees is to increase efficiency of the activities of the collegial body by ensuring that decisions are based on due consideration, and to help organize its work with a view to ensuring that the decisions it takes are free of material conflicts of interest. Committees should exercise independent judgement and integrity when exercising its functions as well as present the collegial body with recommendations concerning the decisions of the collegial body. Nevertheless the final decision shall be adopted by the collegial body. The recommendation on creation of committees is not intended, in principle, to constrict the competence of the collegial body or to remove the matters considered from the purview of the collegial body itself, which remains fully responsible for the decisions taken in its field of competence. |
Yes | The key objective of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee is to provide the bodies of the company and persons, who nominate or elect members of the management bodies and executive officers of the company, with recommendations and to ensure the transparent policy, principles and order of the settlement of remuneration to members of the management bodies and executive officers. The Committee provides the Management Board with help while supervising (i) election and nomination of the chief executive office and other executive officers, (ii) the settlement of remuneration to the members of the Management Board, to the chief executive office and to other executive officers. Audit Committee exercises independent judgement and integrity when exercising its functions. Its key objective is to observe the preparation process of financial statements, to supervise performance of audit of financial accountability of the company, to supervise how Audit Company keeps to the principles of independency and objectivity, and to supervise the effectiveness of internal control and risk management systems. The Committee provides the Management Board of the company with help while supervising (i) disclosure quality and consistency of financial, accounting and other relevant documents, (ii) the qualification of an independent auditor, his/her independency and proper performance of |
11 The Law of the Republic of Lithuania on Audit (Official Gazette, 2008, No 82-53233) determines that an Audit Committee shall be formed in each public interest entity (including, but not limited to public companies whose securities are traded in the regulated market of the Republic of Lithuania and/or any other member state).
| his/her office, (iii) the implementation of internal control. | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4.9. Committees established by the collegial body should normally be composed of at least three members. In companies with small number of members of the collegial body, they could exceptionally be composed of two members. Majority of the members of each committee should be constituted from independent members of the collegial body. In cases when the company chooses not to set up a supervisory board, remuneration and audit committees should be entirely comprised of non-executive directors. |
Yes | Each committee of the company is composed of 3 members. |
| Chairmanship and membership of the committees should be decided with due regard to the need to ensure that committee membership is refreshed and that undue reliance is not placed on particular individuals. |
||
| 4.10. Authority of each of the committees should be determined by the collegial body. Committees should perform their duties in line with authority delegated to them and inform the collegial body on their activities and performance on regular basis. Authority of every committee stipulating the role and rights and duties of the committee should be made public at least once a year (as part of the information disclosed by the company annually on its corporate governance structures and practices). Companies should also make public annually a statement by existing committees on their composition, number of meetings and attendance over the year, and their main activities. Audit committee should confirm that it is satisfied with the independence of the audit process and describe briefly the actions it has taken to reach this conclusion. |
Yes | The activity of Nomination and Remuneration Committee is regulated by Regulations Statute Rules approved by the Management Board. The Regulations of Activity of Audit Committee is approved by the General Meeting of Shareholders. Both committees on a regular basis inform the collegial body on their activities and performance. |
| 4.11. In order to ensure independence and impartiality of the committees, members of the collegial body that are not members of the committee should commonly have a right to participate in the meetings of the committee only if invited by the committee. A committee may invite or demand participation in the meeting of particular officers or experts. Chairman of each of the committees should have a possibility to maintain direct communication with the shareholders. Events when such are to be performed should be specified in the regulations for committee activities. |
Yes | If necessary, the employees of the company, who are responsible for the spheres of activity that are discussed by the committee, participate in the meetings of the committees and provide the committees with entire required information. |
| 4.12. Nomination Committee. 4.12.1. Key functions of the nomination committee should be the following: 1) Identify and recommend, for the approval of the collegial body, candidates to fill board vacancies. The nomination committee should evaluate the balance of skills, knowledge and experience on the management body, |
Yes | The functions of nomination committee, which are set out in this recommendation, basically are carried out by the Nomination and Remuneration Committee of the company. |
| prepare a description of the roles and | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| capabilities required to assume a |
|||
| particular office, and assess the time | |||
| commitment expected. Nomination |
|||
| committee can also consider candidates | |||
| to members of the collegial body | |||
| delegated by the shareholders of the | |||
| company; | |||
| 2) | Assess on regular basis the structure, | ||
| size, composition and performance of | |||
| the supervisory and management |
|||
| bodies, and make recommendations to | |||
| the collegial body regarding the means | |||
| of achieving necessary changes; | |||
| 3) | Assess on regular basis the skills, | ||
| knowledge and experience of |
|||
| individual directors and report on this | |||
| to the collegial body; | |||
| 4) | Properly consider issues related to | ||
| succession planning; | |||
| 5) | Review the policy of the management | ||
| bodies for selection and appointment of | |||
| senior management. | |||
| 4.12.2. Nomination committee should consider | |||
| proposals | by other parties, including |
||
| management and shareholders. When dealing | |||
| with issues related to executive directors or | |||
| members of the board (if a collegial body elected | |||
| by the general shareholders" meeting is the | |||
| supervisory board) and senior management, | |||
| chief executive officer of the company should be | |||
| consulted by, and entitled to submit proposals to | |||
| the Nomination committee. | |||
| 4.13. Remuneration Committee. | Yes | The functions of Remuneration committee, which are set | |
| 4.13.1. | Key functions of the remuneration |
out in this recommendation, basically are carried out by | |
| committee should be the following: | the Nomination and Remuneration Committee of the |
||
| 1) Make proposals, for the approval of the | company. | ||
| collegial body, on the remuneration policy for | |||
| members of management bodies and executive | |||
| directors. Such policy should address all forms | |||
| of | compensation, including the fixed |
||
| remuneration, performance-based remuneration | |||
| schemes, pension arrangements, and termination | |||
| payments. Proposals considering performance | |||
| based | remuneration schemes should be |
||
| accompanied with recommendations on the | |||
| related objectives and evaluation criteria, with a | |||
| view to properly aligning the pay of executive | |||
| director and members of the management bodies | |||
| with the long-term interests of the shareholders | |||
| and the objectives set by the collegial body; | |||
| 2) Make proposals to the collegial body on the | |||
| individual remuneration for executive directors | |||
| and member of management bodies in order | |||
| their | remunerations are consistent with |
||
| company"s | remuneration policy and the |
||
| evaluation of the performance of these persons | |||
| concerned. In doing so, the committee should be | |||
| properly informed on the total compensation | |||
| obtained by executive directors and members of | |||
| the management bodies from the affiliated | |||
| companies; | |||
| 3) | Ensure that remuneration of individual | ||
| executive directors or members of management | |||
| body is proportionate to the remuneration of | |||
| other | executive directors or members of management body and other staff members of |
| the company. 4) Periodically review the remuneration policy for executive directors or members of management body, including the policy regarding share-based remuneration, and its implementation. 5) Make proposals to the collegial body on suitable forms of contracts for executive directors and members of the management bodies; 6) Assist the collegial body in overseeing how the company complies with applicable provisions regarding the remuneration-related information disclosure (in particular the remuneration policy applied and individual remuneration of directors); 7) Make general recommendations to the executive directors and members of the management bodies on the level and structure of remuneration for senior management (as defined by the collegial body) with regard to the respective information provided by the executive directors and members of the |
||
|---|---|---|
| management bodies. 4.13.2. With respect to stock options and other share-based incentives which may be granted to directors or other employees, the committee |
||
| should: 1) Consider general policy regarding the granting of the above mentioned schemes, in particular stock options, and make any related proposals to the collegial body; 2) Examine the related information that is given in the company"s annual report and documents intended for the use during the shareholders meeting; 3) Make proposals to the collegial body regarding the choice between granting options to subscribe shares or granting options to purchase shares, specifying the reasons for its choice as well as the consequences that this choice has. |
||
| 4.13.3. Upon resolution of the issues attributable to the competence of the remuneration committee, the committee should at least address the chairman of the collegial body and/or chief executive officer of the company for their opinion on the remuneration of other executive directors or members of the management bodies. |
||
| 4.13.4. The remuneration committee should report on the exercise of its functions to the shareholders and be present at the annual general meeting for this purpose. |
||
| 4.14. Audit Committee. 4.14.1. Key functions of the audit committee should be the following: 1) Observe the integrity of the financial information provided by the company, in particular by reviewing the relevance and consistency of the accounting methods used by the company and its group (including the criteria for the consolidation of the accounts of companies in the group); |
Yes | The company substantially follows the provisions of these recommendations. Audit Committee exercises independent judgement and integrity when exercising its functions. Its key objective is to observe the preparation process of financial statements, to supervise performance of audit of financial accountability of the company, to supervise how Audit Company keeps to the principles of independency and objectivity, and to supervise the effectiveness of internal control and risk management systems. The Committee provides the Management Board |
| 2) At least once a year review the systems of | with help while observing (i) the quality and consistency |
|---|---|
| internal control and risk management to ensure | of financial, accounting and other relevant documents, (ii) |
| that the key risks (inclusive of the risks in | the qualification of the independent auditor, his/her |
| relation with compliance with existing laws and | independency and proper performance of his/her office, |
| regulations) are properly identified, managed | (iii) the implementation of internal control. |
| and reflected in the information provided; | |
| 3) Ensure the efficiency of the internal audit | |
| function, among other things, by making |
|
| recommendations on the selection, appointment, | |
| reappointment and removal of the head of the | |
| internal audit department and on the budget of | |
| the department, and by monitoring the |
|
| responsiveness of the management to its |
|
| findings and recommendations. Should there be | |
| no internal audit authority in the company, the | |
| need for one should be reviewed at least | |
| annually; | |
| 4) Make recommendations to the collegial body | |
| related with selection, appointment, |
|
| reappointment and removal of the external | |
| auditor (to be done by the general shareholders" | |
| meeting) and with the terms and conditions of | |
| his engagement. The committee should |
|
| investigate situations that lead to a resignation of | |
| the audit company or auditor and make |
|
| recommendations on required actions in such | |
| situations; | |
| 5) Monitor independence and impartiality of the | |
| external auditor, in particular by reviewing the | |
| audit company"s compliance with applicable | |
| guidance relating to the rotation of audit | |
| partners, the level of fees paid by the company, | |
| and similar issues. In order to prevent |
|
| occurrence of material conflicts of interest, the | |
| committee, based on the auditor"s disclosed inter | |
| alia data on all remunerations paid by the | |
| company to the auditor and network, should at | |
| all times monitor nature and extent of the non | |
| audit services. Having regard to the principals | |
| and guidelines established in the 16 May 2002 | |
| Commission Recommendation | |
| 2002/590/EC, the committee should determine | |
| and apply a formal policy establishing types of | |
| non-audit services that are (a) excluded, (b) | |
| permissible only after review by the committee, | |
| and (c) permissible without referral to the | |
| committee; | |
| 6) Review efficiency of the external audit process | |
| and responsiveness of management to |
|
| recommendations made in the external auditor"s | |
| management letter. | |
| 4.14.2. All members of the committee should be | |
| furnished with complete information on |
|
| particulars of accounting, financial and other | |
| operations of the company. Company"s |
|
| management should inform the audit committee | |
| of the methods used to account for significant | |
| and unusual transactions where the accounting | |
| treatment may be open to different approaches. | |
| In such case a special consideration should be | |
| given to company"s operations in offshore | |
| centers and/or activities carried out through | |
| special purpose vehicles (organizations) and | |
| justification of such operations. | |
| 4.14.3. The audit committee should decide | |
| whether participation of the chairman of the | |
| collegial body, chief executive officer of the | |
| company, chief financial officer (or superior | |
| employees in charge of finances, treasury and |
| accounting), or internal and external auditors in the meetings of the committee is required (if required, when). The committee should be entitled, when needed, to meet with any relevant person without executive directors and members of the management bodies present. 4.14.4. Internal and external auditors should be secured with not only effective working relationship with management, but also with free access to the collegial body. For this purpose the audit committee should act as the principal contact person for the internal and external auditors. 4.14.5. The audit committee should be informed of the internal auditor"s work program, and should be furnished with internal audit"s reports or periodic summaries. The audit committee should also be informed of the work program of the external auditor and should be furnished with report disclosing all relationships between the independent auditor and the company and its group. The committee should be timely furnished information on all issues arising from the audit. 4.14.6. The audit committee should examine whether the company is following applicable provisions regarding the possibility for employees to report alleged significant irregularities in the company, by way of complaints or through anonymous submissions (normally to an independent member of the collegial body), and should ensure that there is a procedure established for proportionate and independent investigation of these issues and for appropriate follow-up action. 4.14.7. The audit committee should report on its activities to the collegial body at least once in every six months, at the time the yearly and half yearly statements are approved. |
||
|---|---|---|
| 4.15. Every year the collegial body should conduct the assessment of its activities. The assessment should include evaluation of collegial body"s structure, work organization and ability to act as a group, evaluation of each of the collegial body member"s and committee"s competence and work efficiency and assessment whether the collegial body has achieved its objectives. The collegial body should, at least once a year, make public (as part of the information the company annually discloses on its management structures and practices) respective information on its internal organization and working procedures, and specify what material changes were made as a result of the assessment of the collegial body of its own activities. |
No | The company has no practice of assessment of activities of the Management Board and disclosure of information on its activity. The Management Board plans to conduct the assessment of its activities in the future. |
| Principle V: The working procedure of the company"s collegial bodies | ||
| company"s bodies. | The working procedure of supervisory and management bodies established in the company should ensure efficient operation of these bodies and decision-making and encourage active co-operation between the |
|
| 5.1. The company"s supervisory and management bodies (hereinafter in this |
Yes | The chairperson of the Management Board heads up the meetings of the Management Board. The employee of the |
| Principle the concept "collegial bodies" covers both the collegial bodies of supervision and the collegial bodies of management) should be chaired by chairpersons of these bodies. The chairperson of a collegial body is responsible for proper convocation of the collegial body meetings. The chairperson should ensure that information about the meeting being convened and its agenda are communicated to all members of the body. The chairperson of a collegial body should ensure appropriate conducting of the meetings of the collegial body. The chairperson should ensure order and working atmosphere during the meeting. |
company organizes the work of the Management Board by order of the chairperson of the Management Board. |
|
|---|---|---|
| 5.2. It is recommended that meetings of the company"s collegial bodies should be carried out according to the schedule approved in advance at certain intervals of time. Each company is free to decide how often to convene meetings of the collegial bodies, but it is recommended that these meetings should be convened at such intervals, which would guarantee an interrupted resolution of the essential corporate governance issues. Meetings of the company"s supervisory board should be convened at least once in a quarter, and the company"s board should meet at least once a month12. |
Yes | The chairperson of the Management Board heads up the meetings of the Management Board. The employee of the company organizes the work of the Management Board by order of the chairperson of the Management Board. Meetings of the Management Board are organized once per month. |
| 5.3. Members of a collegial body should be notified about the meeting being convened in advance in order to allow sufficient time for proper preparation for the issues on the agenda of the meeting and to ensure fruitful discussion and adoption of appropriate decisions. Alongside with the notice about the meeting being convened, all the documents relevant to the issues on the agenda of the meeting should be submitted to the members of the collegial body. The agenda of the meeting should not be changed or supplemented during the meeting, unless all members of the collegial body are present or certain issues of great importance to the company require immediate resolution. |
Yes | Each member of the management body may take the cognizance of the issues on the agenda of the meeting before the day of the meeting. Issues under discussion (thesis of reports, draft resolutions, etc.) are presented in advance alongside with the notice about the meeting being convened. Usually the announced agenda of the meeting is not changed unless it is decided otherwise during the meeting, when all members of the Management Board are present, and if the material for the supplemented issue is sufficient in order to make the decision on the issue that has not been announced on the agenda. Issues of agenda of the meetings and draft resolutions are prepared and presented by the chief executive office of the company, by the members of the Management Board, or by special groups, which are formed on the decision of the Management Board and which may include specialists who are not the employees of the company. |
12 The frequency of meetings of the collegial body provided for in the recommendation must be applied in those cases when both additional collegial bodies are formed at the company, the board and the supervisory board. In the event only one additional collegial body is formed in the company, the frequency of its meetings may be as established for the supervisory board, i.e. at least once in a quarter.
| 5.4. In order to co-ordinate operation of the company"s collegial bodies and ensure effective decision-making process, chairpersons of the company"s collegial bodies of supervision and management should closely co-operate by co coordinating dates of the meetings, their agendas and resolving other issues of corporate governance. Members of the company"s board should be free to attend meetings of the company"s supervisory board, especially where issues concerning removal of the board members, their liability or remuneration are discussed. |
No | The company cannot follow Recommendation 5.4 because the company does not establish any collegial supervisory bodies. |
|---|---|---|
| Principle VI: The equitable treatment of shareholders and shareholder rights | ||
| shareholders. | The corporate governance framework should ensure the equitable treatment of all shareholders, including minority and foreign shareholders. The corporate governance framework should protect the rights of the |
|
| 6.1. It is recommended that the company"s capital should consist only of the shares that grant the same rights to voting, ownership, dividend and other rights to all their holders. |
Yes | The capital of the company consists of ordinary registered shares that grant the same personal property and not property right to all holders of company"s shares. |
| 6.2. It is recommended that investors should have access to the information concerning the rights attached to the shares of the new issue or those issued earlier in advance, i.e. before they purchase shares. |
Yes | The Articles of Association, which defines the rights attached to the shares for the investors, are publicly announced on the website of the company. |
| 6.3. Transactions that are important to the company and its shareholders, such as transfer, investment, and pledge of the company"s assets or any other type of encumbrance should be subject to approval of the general shareholders" meeting.13 All shareholders should be furnished with equal opportunity to familiarize with and participate in the decision-making process when significant corporate issues, including approval of transactions referred to above, are discussed. |
Yes | Important transactions are approved following the order set in the Articles of Association. |
| 6.4. Procedures of convening and conducting a general shareholders" meeting should ensure equal opportunities for the shareholders to effectively participate at the meetings and should not prejudice the rights and interests of the shareholders. The venue, date, and time of the shareholders" meeting should not hinder wide attendance of the shareholders. |
Yes | The Articles of Association provide that all persons, who are shareholders of the company on the day of the General Shareholders" Meeting, shall have the right to attend and vote at the General Shareholders" Meeting or may authorise other persons to vote for them as proxies or may transfer their right to vote to other persons with whom an agreement on the transfer of the voting right has been concluded. Members of the Management Board, chief executive officer of the company and the auditor who |
13 The Law on Companies of the Republic of Lithuania (Official Gazette, 2003, No 123-5574) no longer assigns resolutions concerning the investment, transfer, lease, mortgage or acquisition of the long-terms assets accounting for more than 1/20 of the company"s authorised capital to the competence of the general shareholders" meeting. However, transactions that are important and material for the company"s activity should be considered and approved by the general shareholders" meeting. The Law on Companies contains no prohibition to this effect either. Yet, in order not to encumber the company"s activity and escape an unreasonably frequent consideration of transactions at the meetings, companies are free to establish their own criteria of material transactions, which are subject to the approval of the meeting. While establishing these criteria of material transactions, companies may follow the criteria set out in items 3, 4, 5 and 6 of paragraph 4 of Article 34 of the Law on Companies or derogate from them in view of the specific nature of their operation and their attempt to ensure uninterrupted, efficient functioning of the company.
| prepared the auditor's opinion and audit report may attend and speak at the General Meeting. A shareholder, who has the right to vote and who is familiar with the agenda, may give written notice to the General Shareholders" Meeting of her/his will "for" or "against" on every single decision. These notices are included into the quorum of the meeting and into the voting results. |
||
|---|---|---|
| 6.5. If is possible, in order to ensure shareholders living abroad the right to access to the information, it is recommended that documents on the course of the general shareholders" meeting should be placed on the publicly accessible website of the company not only in Lithuanian language, but in English and /or other foreign languages in advance. It is recommended that the minutes of the general shareholders" meeting after signing them and/or adopted resolutions should be also placed on the publicly accessible website of the company. Seeking to ensure the right of foreigners to familiarize with the information, whenever feasible, documents referred to in this recommendation should be published in Lithuanian, English and/or other foreign languages. Documents referred to in this recommendation may be published on the publicly accessible website of the company to the extent that publishing of these documents is not detrimental to the company or the company"s commercial secrets are not revealed. |
Yes | No late that 21 day before the General Shareholders" Meeting, shareholders are provided with an opportunity to familiarize with documentation of the Company related to the agenda of the meeting, including draft decisions and application submitted to the Management Board by the initiator of the General Shareholders" Meeting. If the shareholder requests in writing, chief executive office of the Company no later than 3 days from the receipt of a written request hands in all draft decisions of the meeting to the shareholder against the signature and sends by registered mail. The draft decisions should be referred to whose initiative they are involved. If the initiator of the draft decision submitted the explanations of the draft decision, these are attached to the draft decision. No later than 21 day before the Meeting the following documents are placed on the website of the company and NASDAQ OMX Vilnius in Lithuanian and English languages: 1. Draft decisions concerning each issue of the agenda of the General Shareholders" Meeting 2. Audited annual financial statements and auditor's report 3. Annual Report |
| 6.6. Shareholders should be furnished with the opportunity to vote in the general shareholders" meeting in person and in absentia. Shareholders should not be prevented from voting in writing in advance by completing the general voting ballot. |
Yes | A shareholder, who has the right to vote and who is familiar with the agenda, may give written notice to the General Shareholders" Meeting of her/his will "for" or "against" on every single decision. |
| 6.7. With a view to increasing the shareholders" opportunities to participate effectively at shareholders" meetings, the companies are recommended to expand use of modern technologies by allowing the shareholders to participate and vote in general meetings via electronic means of communication. In such cases security of transmitted information and a possibility to identify the identity of the participating and voting person should be guaranteed. Moreover, companies could furnish its shareholders, especially shareholders living abroad, with the opportunity to watch shareholder meetings by means of modern technologies. |
No | Until 01/01/2010 the Company has not applied the means of modern technologies, however, it plans to do it in the future. |
| Principle VII: The avoidance of conflicts of interest and their disclosure members of the corporate bodies. |
The corporate governance framework should encourage members of the corporate bodies to avoid conflicts of interest and assure transparent and effective mechanism of disclosure of conflicts of interest regarding |
|
| 7.1. Any member of the company"s supervisory and management body should avoid a situation, in which his/her personal interests are in conflict or may be in conflict with the |
Yes | The members of the Management Board avoid situations of a conflict of personal and company"s interests. |
| company"s interests. In case such a situation did occur, a member of the company"s supervisory and management body should, within reasonable time, inform other members of the same collegial body or the company"s body that has elected him/her, or to the company"s shareholders about a situation of a conflict of interest, indicate the nature of the conflict and value, where possible. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.2. Any member of the company"s supervisory and management body may not mix the company"s assets, the use of which has not been mutually agreed upon, with his/her personal assets or use them or the information which he/she learns by virtue of his/her position as a member of a corporate body for his/her personal benefit or for the benefit of any third person without a prior agreement of the general shareholders" meeting or any other corporate body authorized by the meeting. |
Yes | The members of the Management Board do not mix the company"s assets with his/her personal assets. |
|
| 7.3. Any member of the company"s supervisory and management body may conclude a transaction with the company, a member of a corporate body of which he/she is. Such a transaction (except insignificant ones due to their low value or concluded when carrying out routine operations in the company under usual conditions) must be immediately reported in writing or orally, by recording this in the minutes of the meeting, to other members of the same corporate body or to the corporate body that has elected him/her or to the company"s shareholders. Transactions specified in this recommendation are also subject to recommendation 4.5. |
Yes | Any member of the Management Board may conclude a transaction with the company. Such a transaction (except insignificant ones due to their low value or concluded when carrying out routine operations in the company under usual conditions) must be immediately reported in writing or orally, by recording this in the minutes of the meeting, to other members of the same corporate body or to the corporate body that has elected him/her or to the company"s shareholders. |
|
| 7.4. Any member of the company"s supervisory and management body should abstain from voting when decisions concerning transactions or other issues of personal or business interest are voted on. |
Yes | The members of the Management Board abstain from voting when decisions concerning transactions or other issues of personal or business interest are voted on. |
|
| Principle VIII: Company"s remuneration policy | |||
| Remuneration policy and procedure for approval, revision and disclosure of directors" remuneration established in the company should prevent potential conflicts of interest and abuse in determining remuneration of directors, in addition it should ensure publicity and transparency both of company"s remuneration policy and remuneration of directors. |
|||
| 8.1. A company should make a public statement of the company"s remuneration policy (hereinafter the remuneration statement) which should be clear and easily understandable. This remuneration statement should be published as a part of the company"s annual statement as well as posted on the company"s website. |
No | The company does not follow the recommendations due to public statement of the company"s remuneration policy. The company follows the approved policy in accordance with which the system of remuneration and premiums as well as other payments, which are related with labour relations, is not publicly announced, and the company attributes such information to information of commercially confidential nature. |
|
| 8.2. Remuneration statement should mainly focus on directors" remuneration policy for the following year and, if appropriate, the subsequent years. The statement should contain a summary of the implementation of the |
No | The company does not follow the recommendations due to public statement of the company"s remuneration policy. The company follows the approved policy in accordance with which the system of remuneration and premiums as well as other payments, which are related with labour |
| remuneration policy in the previous financial year. Special attention should be given to any significant changes in company"s remuneration policy as compared to the previous financial year. |
relations, is not publicly announced, and the company attributes such information to information of commercially confidential nature. |
|
|---|---|---|
| 8.3. Remuneration statement should leastwise include the following information: 1) Explanation of the relative importance of the variable and non-variable components of directors" remuneration; 2) Sufficient information on performance criteria that entitles directors to share options, shares or variable components of remuneration; 3) An explanation how the choice of performance criteria contributes to the long term interests of the company; 4) An explanation of the methods, applied in order to determine whether performance criteria have been fulfilled; 5) Sufficient information on deferment periods with regard to variable components of remuneration; 6) Sufficient information on the linkage between the remuneration and performance; 7) The main parameters and rationale for any annual bonus scheme and any other non-cash benefits; 8) Sufficient information on the policy regarding termination payments; 9) Sufficient information with regard to vesting periods for share-based remuneration, as referred to in point 8.13 of this Code; 10) Sufficient information on the policy regarding retention of shares after vesting, as referred to in point 8.15 of this Code; 11) Sufficient information on the composition of peer groups of companies the remuneration policy of which has been examined in relation to the establishment of the remuneration policy of the company concerned; 12) A description of the main characteristics of supplementary pension or early retirement schemes for directors; 13) Remuneration statement should not include commercially sensitive information. |
No | The company does not follow the recommendations due to public statement of the company"s remuneration policy. The company follows the approved policy in accordance with which the system of remuneration and premiums as well as other payments, which are related with labour relations, is not publicly announced, and the company attributes such information to information of commercially confidential nature. |
| 8.4. Remuneration statement should also summarize and explain company"s policy regarding the terms of the contracts executed with executive directors and members of the management bodies. It should include, inter alia, information on the duration of contracts with executive directors and members of the management bodies, the applicable notice periods and details of provisions for termination payments linked to early termination under contracts for executive directors and members of the management bodies. |
No | |
| 8.5. Remuneration statement should also contain detailed information on the entire amount of remuneration, inclusive of other benefits, that was paid to individual directors over the relevant financial year. This document |
No |
| should list at least the information set out in | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| items 8.5.1 to 8.5.4 for each person who has | |||
| served as a director of the company at any time | |||
| during the relevant financial year. | |||
| 8.5.1. The following remuneration and/or |
|||
| emoluments -related information should be |
|||
| disclosed: | |||
| 1) The total amount of remuneration paid or | |||
| due to the director for services performed | |||
| during the relevant financial year, inclusive of, |
where relevant, attendance fees fixed by the annual general shareholders meeting;
2) The remuneration and advantages received from any undertaking belonging to the same group;
3) The remuneration paid in the form of profit sharing and/or bonus payments and the reasons why such bonus payments and/or profit sharing were granted;
4) If permissible by the law, any significant additional remuneration paid to directors for special services outside the scope of the usual functions of a director;
5) Compensation receivable or paid to each former executive director or member of the management body as a result of his resignation from the office during the previous financial year;
6) Total estimated value of non -cash benefits considered as remuneration, other than the items covered in the above points.
8.5.2. As regards shares and/or rights to acquire share options and/or all other share -incentive schemes, the following information should be disclosed:
1) The number of share options offered or shares granted by the company during the relevant financial year and their conditions of application;
2) The number of shares options exercised during the relevant financial year and, for each of them, the number of shares involved and the exercise price or the value of the interest in the share incentive scheme at the end of the financial year;
3) The number of share options unexercised at the end of the financial year; their exercise price, the exercise date and the main conditions for the exercise of the rights;
4) All changes in the terms and conditions of existing share options occurring during the financial year.
8.5.3. The following supplementary pension schemes -related information should be disclosed:
1) When the pension scheme is a defined benefit scheme, changes in the directors" accrued benefits under that scheme during the relevant financial year;
2) When the pension scheme is defined contribution scheme, detailed information on contributions paid or payable by the company in respect of that director during the relevant financial year.
8.5.4. The statement should also state amounts that the company or any subsidiary company or entity included in the consolidated annual financial report of the company has paid to each person who has served as a director in the
| company at any time during the relevant financial year in the form of loans, advance payments or guarantees, including the amount outstanding and the interest rate. |
||
|---|---|---|
| 8.6. Where the remuneration policy includes variable components of remuneration, companies should set limits on the variable component(s). The non-variable component of remuneration should be sufficient to allow the company to withhold variable components of remuneration when performance criteria are not met. |
No | |
| 8.7. Award of variable components of remuneration should be subject to predetermined and measurable performance criteria. |
No | |
| 8.8. Where a variable component of remuneration is awarded, a major part of the variable component should be deferred for a minimum period of time. The part of the variable component subject to deferment should be determined in relation to the relative weight of the variable component compared to the non-variable component of remuneration. |
No | |
| 8.9. Contractual arrangements with executive or managing directors should include provisions that permit the company to reclaim variable components of remuneration that were awarded on the basis of data which subsequently proved to be manifestly misstated. |
No | |
| 8.10. Termination payments should not exceed a fixed amount or fixed number of years of annual remuneration, which should, in general, not be higher than two years of the non-variable component of remuneration or the equivalent thereof. |
No | |
| 8.11. Termination payments should not be paid if the termination is due to inadequate performance. |
No | |
| 8.12. The information on preparatory and decision-making processes, during which a policy of remuneration of directors is being established, should also be disclosed. Information should include data, if applicable, on authorities and composition of the remuneration committee, names and surnames of external consultants whose services have been used in determination of the remuneration policy as well as the role of shareholders" annual general meeting. |
No | The company does not follow the recommendations due to public statement of the company"s remuneration policy. The company follows the approved policy in accordance with which the system of remuneration and premiums as well as other payments, which are related with labour relations, is not publicly announced, and the company attributes such information to information of commercially confidential nature. |
| 8.13. Shares should not vest for at least three years after their award. |
No | The company does not follow schemes according to which chief executive officers are remunerated with shares, |
| transactions of share choice and other rights to acquire shares or to be remunerated basing on the changes in share price. |
||
|---|---|---|
| 8.14. Share options or any other right to acquire shares or to be remunerated on the basis of share price movements should not be exercisable for at least three years after their award. Vesting of shares and the right to exercise share options or any other right to acquire shares or to be remunerated on the basis of share price movements, should be subject to predetermined and measurable performance criteria. |
||
| 8.15. After vesting, directors should retain a number of shares, until the end of their mandate, subject to the need to finance any costs related to acquisition of the shares. The number of shares to be retained should be fixed, for example, twice the value of total annual remuneration (the non-variable plus the variable components). |
||
| 8.16. Remuneration of non-executive or supervisory directors should not include share options. |
||
| 8.17. Shareholders, in particular institutional shareholders, should be encouraged to attend general meetings where appropriate and make considered use of their votes regarding directors" remuneration. |
||
| 8.18. Without prejudice to the role and organization of the relevant bodies responsible for setting directors" remunerations, the remuneration policy or any other significant change in remuneration policy should be included into the agenda of the shareholders" annual general meeting. Remuneration statement should be put for voting in shareholders" annual general meeting. The vote may be either mandatory or advisory. |
||
| 8.19. Schemes anticipating remuneration of directors in shares, share options or any other right to purchase shares or be remunerated on the basis of share price movements should be subject to the prior approval of shareholders" annual general meeting by way of a resolution prior to their adoption. The approval of scheme should be related with the scheme itself and not to the grant of such share-based benefits under that scheme to individual directors. All significant changes in scheme provisions should also be subject to shareholders" approval prior to their adoption; the approval decision should be made in shareholders" annual general meeting. In such case shareholders should be notified on all terms of suggested changes and get an explanation on the impact of the suggested changes. |
Not applicable |
The company does not follow schemes according to which chief executive officers are remunerated with shares, transactions of share choice and other rights to acquire shares or to be remunerated basing on the changes in share price. |
| 8.20. The following issues should be subject to approval by the shareholders" annual general meeting: 1) Grant of share-based schemes, including share options, to directors; 2) Determination of maximum number of shares and main conditions of share granting; 3) The term within which options can be exercised; 4) The conditions for any subsequent change in the exercise of the options, if permissible by law; 5) All other long-term incentive schemes for which directors are eligible and which are not available to other employees of the company under similar terms. Annual general meeting should also set the deadline within which the body responsible for remuneration of directors may award compensations listed in this article to individual directors. |
Not applicable |
|
|---|---|---|
| 8.21. Should national law or company"s Articles of Association allow, any discounted option arrangement under which any rights are granted to subscribe to shares at a price lower than the market value of the share prevailing on the day of the price determination, or the average of the market values over a number of days preceding the date when the exercise price is determined, should also be subject to the shareholders" approval. |
Not applicable |
The company does not follow the recommendations set in clause 8.19. |
| 8.22. Provisions of Articles 8.19 and 8.20 should not be applicable to schemes allowing for participation under similar conditions to company"s employees or employees of any subsidiary company whose employees are eligible to participate in the scheme and which has been approved in the shareholders" annual general meeting. |
||
| 8.23. Prior to the annual general meeting that is intended to consider decision stipulated in Article 8.19, the shareholders must be provided an opportunity to familiarize with draft resolution and project-related notice (the documents should be posted on the company"s website). The notice should contain the full text of the share-based remuneration schemes or a description of their key terms, as well as full names of the participants in the schemes. Notice should also specify the relationship of the schemes and the overall remuneration policy of the directors. Draft resolution must have a clear reference to the scheme itself or to the summary of its key terms. Shareholders must also be presented with information on how the company intends to provide for the shares required to meet its obligations under incentive schemes. It should be clearly stated whether the company intends to buy shares in the market, hold the shares in reserve or issue new ones. There should also be a summary on scheme- |
| related expenses the company will suffer due to the anticipated application of the scheme. All information given in this article must be posted on the company"s website. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Principle IX: The role of stakeholders in corporate governance The corporate governance framework should recognize the rights of stakeholders as established by law and encourage active co-operation between companies and stakeholders in creating the company value, jobs and financial sustainability. For the purposes of this Principle, the concept "stakeholders" includes investors, employees, creditors, suppliers, clients, local community and other persons having certain interest in the company concerned. |
|||
| 9.1. The corporate governance framework should assure that the rights of stakeholders that are protected by law are respected. |
Yes | The company has established conditions under which each stakeholder may participate in the management of the company and they have access to relevant information. |
|
| 9.2. The corporate governance framework should create conditions for the stakeholders to participate in corporate governance in the manner prescribed by law. Examples of mechanisms of stakeholder participation in corporate governance include: employee participation in adoption of certain key decisions for the company; consulting the employees on corporate governance and other important issues; employee participation in the company"s share capital; creditor involvement in governance in the context of the company"s insolvency, etc. |
Yes | Stakeholders, who own the shares of the company, have a right to participate in the meetings of the company, to take interest in activities of the company and its results. If the company works profitably, dividends are paid to the shareholders. |
|
| 9.3. Where stakeholders participate in the corporate governance process, they should have access to relevant information. |
Yes | Stakeholders, who participate in the corporate governance process, have access to relevant information. |
Principle X: Information disclosure and transparency
The corporate governance framework should ensure that timely and accurate disclosure is made on all material information regarding the company, including the financial situation, performance and governance of the company.
| on: | 10.1. The company should disclose information | Yes, except for items 4 |
Information on company"s financial situation, its activity and the management of the company is disclosed in the |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | The financial and operating results of the company; |
and 6 | reports to press, in the reports on material events of the company, in the annual and interim reports of the |
| 2. | Company objectives; | company as well as on the website of the company. | |
| 3. | Persons holding by the right of |
Information regarding the professional background, |
|
| ownership or in control of a block of | labour experience, position held of the members of the | ||
| shares in the company; | management bodies of the company, as well as the | ||
| 4. | Members of the company"s supervisory | information regarding their participation in the activity of | |
| and management bodies, chief executive | other companies and company"s shares that are held by | ||
| officer of the company and their |
them, is publicly disclosed in the periodical reports and on | ||
| remuneration; | the website of the company. | ||
| 5. | Material foreseeable risk factors; | ||
| 6. | Transactions between the company and | ||
| connected persons, as well as |
|||
| transactions concluded outside the |
|||
| course of the company"s regular operations; |
|||
| 7. | Material issues regarding employees and | ||
| other stakeholders; | |||
| 8. | Governance structures and strategy. | Yes | When disclosing the information set in item 1 of |
| Recommendation 10.1, a company, which is the parent of | |||
| This list should be deemed as a minimum | other companies, discloses the information regarding the | ||
| recommendation, while the companies are | consolidated results of the whole group to which the | ||
| encouraged not to limit themselves to |
company belongs. | ||
| disclosure of the information specified in this |
| list. | ||
|---|---|---|
| 10.2. It is recommended to the company, which is the parent of other companies, that consolidated results of the whole group to which the company belongs should be disclosed when information specified in item 1 of Recommendation 10.1 is under disclosure. |
Not applicable |
|
| 10.3. It is recommended that information on the professional background, qualifications of the members of supervisory and management bodies, chief executive officer of the company should be disclosed as well as potential conflicts of interest that may have an effect on their decisions when information specified in item 4 of Recommendation 10.1 about the members of the company"s supervisory and management bodies is under disclosure. It is also recommended that information about the amount of remuneration received from the company and other income should be disclosed with regard to members of the company"s supervisory and management bodies and chief executive officer as per Principle VIII. |
||
| 10.4. It is recommended that information about the links between the company and its stakeholders, including employees, creditors, suppliers, local community, as well as the company"s policy with regard to human resources, employee participation schemes in the company"s share capital, etc. should be disclosed when information specified in item 7 of Recommendation 10.1 is under disclosure. |
||
| 10.5. Information should be disclosed in such a way that neither shareholders nor investors are discriminated with regard to the manner or scope of access to information. Information should be disclosed to all simultaneously. It is recommended that notices about material events should be announced before or after a trading session on the Vilnius Stock Exchange, so that all the company"s shareholders and investors should have equal access to the information and make informed investing decisions. |
Yes | The company presents the information via the information disclosure system applied by Vilnius Stock Exchange simultaneously in Lithuanian and English languages insofar as it is possible so that the Stock Exchange would announce the received information on its website and in the trading system, thus ensuring the simultaneous access to information for everybody. The company endeavors to announce the information before or after a trading session on Vilnius Stock Exchange and to present the information to all stock exchanges on which the securities of the company are traded. The company keeps the confidentiality with regard to information that may have an impact on the price of its issued stocks and does not disclose such information neither in commentaries, nor during interviews, nor otherwise as long as such information is publicly announced via the information system of the stock exchange. |
| 10.6. Channels for disseminating information should provide for fair, timely and cost-efficient access to relevant information by users. It is recommended that information technologies should be employed for wider dissemination of information, for instance, by placing the information on the company"s website. It is recommended that information should be published and placed on the company"s website not only in Lithuanian, but also in English, and, whenever possible and necessary, in other languages as well. |
Yes | The company publicly announces all the essential information (in Lithuanian and English languages) on the website of the company, thus ensuring fair, timely and cost-efficient access to relevant information. |
| 10.7. It is recommended that the company"s annual reports and other periodical accounts prepared by the company should be placed on the company"s website. It is recommended that the company should announce information about material events and changes in the price of the company"s shares on the Stock Exchange on the company"s website too. |
Yes | The company follows this recommendation and places all the essential information on the company"s website. |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Principle XI: The selection of the company"s auditor The mechanism of the selection of the company"s auditor should ensure independence of the firm of auditor"s conclusion and opinion. |
||||||
| 11.1. An annual audit of the company"s financial statements and report should be conducted by an independent firm of auditors in order to provide an external and objective opinion on the company"s financial statements. |
Yes | The company follows this recommendation as the audit of company"s annual financial statement is conducted by an independent firm of auditors. |
||||
| 11.2. It is recommended that the company"s supervisory board and, where it is not set up, the company"s board should propose a candidate firm of auditors to the general shareholders" meeting. |
Yes | The Management Board of the company proposes a candidate firm of auditors to the shareholders" meeting. The firm of auditors is approved by the shareholders" meeting. |
||||
| 11.3. It is recommended that the company should disclose to its shareholders the level of fees paid to the firm of auditors for non-audit services rendered to the company. This information should be also known to the company"s supervisory board and, where it is not formed, the company"s board upon their consideration which firm of auditors to propose for the general shareholders" meeting. |
Not applicable |
The firm of auditors has not rendered to the company any not-audit services and it has not received from the company any remuneration for not-audit services. |
Building tools?
Free accounts include 100 API calls/year for testing.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.