Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

ZEOTECH LIMITED Capital/Financing Update 2014

Jul 9, 2014

66115_rns_2014-07-09_83ebcf79-a304-4bc6-82a0-bced9f738f4e.pdf

Capital/Financing Update

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

==> picture [596 x 107] intentionally omitted <==

10 July 2014

Copper-Gold-Silver Barita Veins Expand Mineral System, Peru

Historic surface sample results add to copper-gold-silver mineralisation throughout Favi Vent Zone

Highlights

  • Further high-grade copper-gold-silver results identified at the Barita vein that is adjacent and parallel to the Española 1 vein system

  • Extensive veining at the Favi Vent Zone is highly encouraging for open-cut potential, which will be targeted by upcoming drilling programs

  • Surface sample results at the Barita vein include:

  • 0.55 m at 2.2 % Cu, 9.72 g/t Au, and 68 g/t Ag in sample 29275

  • 0.9 m at 0.76 % Cu, 2.98 g/t Au, and 17.3 g/t Ag in sample 29265

  • 0.5 m at 0.44 % Cu, 9.7 g/t Au, and 104.5 g/t Ag in sample 29273

  • 0.5 m at 0.34 % Cu, 3.39 g/t Au, and 48.7 g/t Ag in sample 29266

  • The Barita vein extends the known mineralised area around the Española 1 prospect to 130 metres wide by 280 metres long

Laconia Resources Limited (ASX: LCR) (“ Laconia ” or “ the Company ”) is pleased to announce that additional historic data compilation and review has revealed a parallel set of veins adjacent to the Española 1 prospect, called the Barita vein. This trend consists of 280 metres strike of parallel veining immediately west of the Española 1 veins, and also broadens the width of outcropping veining at the area to 130 metres wide.

At Kimsa Orcco, a central region containing copper-rich mineralisation has been recognised through systematic review of historic data with the benefit of modern 3D computer software. This has consolidated Laconia’s understanding of the greater zone of mineralisation and its geological controls. The Company has recently completed successful resampling of mineralised areas which validate and increase confidence in the use of the historical data set in exploration programs planned

==> picture [596 x 56] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [596 x 56] intentionally omitted <==

for later in the year[1]

The Española 1 prospect (see Figure 1), lies within the 100% Laconia owned tenements (Patacancha 3), and the parallel Barita vein is within the Huaco Cucho No 2 tenement, part of a package of 11 tenements over which Laconia has acquired an option (see ASX announcement dated 26 March, 2013).

==> picture [418 x 457] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1: Plan View of the Southern Kimsa Orcco prospects with high-grade copper-gold-silver (green labels) or gold-silver (black labels), including the Barita vein that is parallel to Española 1 prospect. Grid used is PSAD56, Zone 18 South.

==> picture [173 x 10] intentionally omitted <==

2

Laconia’s Managing Director Ian Stuart said: “Parallel vein sets at Barita dramatically increase the area of known mineralisation around the Española 1 prospect. We have incorporated the significant historic results at Barita and our new sampling results at Fortuna and Española 1 into a near-surface model of mineralisation at the Favi Vent Zone. To date we have identified greater than 850 metres strike of high-grade copper-gold-silver veining and this opens up many possibilities for future development of the project, including open cut potential. The presence of such high-grade copper and precious metals is particularly pleasing.” Mr Stuart went on to add: “Sampling results from the northern Kimsa Orcco tenements are pending and we look forward to incorporating these assay and spectral analysis results into our planning.”

Geology of the Barita Vein

The location of Española 1 and Barita vein, plus all other prospects identified as containing epithermal high-grade copper-gold-silver or gold-silver is shown in Figure 1, with reference to the location of the Rasuhuilca gold-silver trend. The structure of the copper zone is dominated by three regional faults, the Huaco Fault, the Huarmicocha Fault and the San Valentin Fault. These faults are the main control on the location of high-grade copper at the Project, and the area within these triple point faults (the Favi Vent) is interpreted to be one of at least two volcanic centres at the Southern Kimsa Orcco prospects. The area is identified as the key target for testing the extent of copper mineralisation and is considered prospective for both shallow epithermal copper mineralisation and deeper porphyry copper mineralisation.

Figure 2 shows the limited outcropping areas, which have been the focus of the sampling in the Favi Vent zone. The remaining surface area is covered by scree material, opening up significant opportunities for identification of mineralisation under shallow cover. The Barita vein is parallel to and about 65 metres west of the veins at the Española 1 prospect, which lies about 900 m to the east of the Rasuhuilca prospect. Figure 2 shows the detailed location of all veins hosting coppergold-silver within the Favi Vent Zone. The dominant vein orientation at the Española 1 prospect strikes about northwest to southeast, extending north to the Indigena vein and intersecting the Favi vein that strikes east to west. The Barita vein prospect has two veins that are parallel, and about 15 metres apart. Figure 3 shows the Barita vein and the Española 1 prospect geology and historic surface sampling, with samples coloured by gold values.

3

==> picture [325 x 430] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2: Plan View of the Southern Kimsa Orcco prospects that have high-grade copper-gold-silver within the Favi Vent Zone, including the Barita vein that is parallel to Española 1 prospect. Grid used is PSAD56, Zone 18 South.

Limited surface sampling has been done at the Barita vein, and potential remains for strongly mineralised breccia pipes in the area that have not yet been identified due to extensive shallow cover by scree slope material. For example, Figure 3 shows a breccia pipe that is about 10 metres wide by 20 metres long that has not been sampled. In addition, there are large areas of strong silicification and alunite alteration that require further sampling, as these alteration zones have been demonstrated to host modest gold and silver values in other parts of the project, such as the

4

Huallatas prospect[2] that is 320 metres west of the Rasuhuilca Deposit, along the Rasuhuilca Trend

(see Figure 2).

==> picture [344 x 494] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 3: Plan View of the Barita vein and Española 1 prospect geology, with high-grade copper-goldsilver results shown in red at Barita vein. The previously released high-grade Española 1 prospect surface sampling results are shown in black. The location of the high-grade copper-gold-silver adit intersection from Laconia sampling in April 2014 is highlighted. Grid used is PSAD56, Zone 18 South.

2 Refer ASX Release dated 20 March 2014

5

As at the Española 1 prospect, there is copper-gold-silver mineralisation in the north part of the vein, and gold-silver (without the copper) in the south part of the Barita vein. This also correlates to a change in elevation, with the lower vein level in the north hosting copper, and the higher vein level in the south being poor in copper. This metal zonation is a feature of the vertical stratification of the gold-silver and copper-gold-silver mineralisation within the high sulphidation epithermal environment and is common in many similar epithermal systems.

The Española 1 and Barita vein prospects are part of a broad region of copper-gold-silver veining at the Southern Kimsa Orcco prospects that spans about 950 metres north to south and 600 metres east to west (570,000 m[2] ). To date there has been over 850 metres strike length of silica-enargite veining identified in outcrop.

Laconia Surface and Adit Channel Sampling at Española 1 Prospect

During April 2014 surface channel samples were collected by Laconia at Española 1 and Fortuna prospects to validate the quality of the historical Buenaventura Ingenieros SAC exploration dataset[3] . Surface channel sample locations for repeat sampling were chosen based on the presence of copper and/or gold-silver mineralisation in the historic dataset. The results from Laconia’s sampling indicate that the historic results are repeatable, and that the calibre of data from Buenaventura Ingenieros SAC work is of high quality. Figure 4 shows the surface sampling completed at Española 1 and Fortuna prospects during April 2014. Highlight results from the Laconia surface sampling at Española 1 prospect include:

  • 0.87 m at 8.12 % Cu, 4.96 g/t Au, and 142 g/t Ag in sample LC29270B

  • 0.83 m at 7.07 % Cu, 7.12 g/t Au, and 80 g/t Ag in sample LC29244

  • 0.85 m at 2.38 % Cu, 2.43 g/t Au, and 63 g/t Ag in sample LC29268A

  • 0.52 m at 1.88 % Cu, 7.02 g/t Au, and 94 g/t Ag in sample LC29271B

The Española 1 vein system was originally recognised by Laconia as a gold and silver prospect, but was elevated in priority when it established there was an historic adit channel sampling intersection of 24.9 metres at 3.88 % Cu, 2.98 g/t Au and 66.63 g/t Ag, including 15.5 m at 6.54 % Cu, 4.77 g/t Au and 103.86 g/t Ag[4] hosted in a breccia pipe and enargite-covellite veining.

3 Refer ASX release 18 June 2014

4 Refer ASX release 27 February 2013

6

Laconia has now undertaken a program of repeat underground channel sampling at Kimsa Orcco during April 2014 that has confirmed the intersection, with 25 samples collected over 14 of the 16 original Buenaventura channel sample locations. The new intersection returned from sampling by Laconia is 21.5 m at 2.55 % Cu, 2.26 g/t Au and 50.97 g/t Ag, including 12.3 m at 3.72 % Cu, 3.22 g/t Au and 69.74 g/t Ag[5] . The slightly smaller length reported for this intersection is due to the first sample of the adit not being repeated, due to removal of the zone at this point by minor caving of the breccia at the adit entrance. Figure 5 presents the adit sampling conducted by Laconia during April 2014, with the historic results from Buenaventura Ingenieros SAC during 2002 also shown.

==> picture [275 x 396] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 4: Plan View of the Barita vein and Española 1 prospect geology, with high-grade copper-goldsilver results from Laconia’s April 2014 Sampling Program shown in red. The location of the high-grade copper-gold-silver adit intersection from Laconia sampling in April 2014 is highlighted. Grid used is PSAD56, Zone 18 South.

==> picture [110 x 10] intentionally omitted <==

7

==> picture [384 x 430] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 5: Plan View of the repeat sampling at Española 1 prospect, 4805 level adit, with high-grade copper-gold-silver results from Laconia sampling shown in red. Historic Buenaventura Ingenieros SAC sampling results are shown in black along the channel sample location. Grid used is PSAD56, Zone 18 South.

Planned Exploration Work

An initial program commenced during April 2014 at the Northern Kimsa Orcco prospects. The aim was to collect stream samples and surface rock chip samples as part of a preliminary exploration program testing the alteration systems for porphyry copper prospectivity. Results from this work are pending.

8

Work planned at Southern Kimsa Orcco prospects includes drill testing of the strike extent of coppergold-silver veins and breccias, using diamond drilling, plus testing concealed areas between the known veins for further mineralised structures. Final drill plan details will be selected following completion of 3D geological modelling of the area.

Surface geochemical studies are also planned over the Favi Vent zone, prior to drill testing, to further characterise the zones of alteration, and allow finer vectoring to the centre of the altered systems, in preparation for drill testing for copper porphyry mineralisation. Final drill positions for testing the epithermal copper-gold-silver veining will also be ground-truthed during this field campaign. Figure 6 below shows the exploration model being applied by Laconia at the Kimsa Orcco Project.

==> picture [466 x 283] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 6: Schematic diagram of the porphyry exploration model at the Kimsa Orcco Project, showing alteration and metal zonation. Some examples of prospects already identified are shown. This image contains vertical exaggeration.

Exploration Results Summary

The geological setting is a volcanic system in the Andean highlands (named Ccarhuaraso) that has an extensive area of alteration and high sulphidation epithermal copper-gold-silver mineralisation hosted in veins and breccias. There is potential for a porphyry copper (+/-gold, +/- molybdenum) body at depth.

9

Results presented in this release are from 22 surface channel samples conducted by Buenaventura Ingenieros SAC in 1999. Surface channel samples were collected as cut channel samples over lengths of 0.4 to 1.5 metres, between 10 and 100 metres apart, cut perpendicular to geological structures (veins or faults).

Surface Channel Samples were submitted to Intertek Bondar Clegg (Bolivia) in 1999. Sample preparation techniques used at the laboratory are not known, but the analysis method used for gold was AAS with Fire Assay on 50 gram aliquots to 2 ppb detection limits. AAS was also used for silver, or by ICP-MS + 35 elements (Ag, Cu, Pb, Zn, Mo, N, Co, Cd, Bi, As, Sb, Hg, Fe, Mn, Te, Ba, Cr, V, Sn, W, La, Al, Mg, Ca, Na, K, Sr, Y, Ga, Li, Nb, Sc, Ta, Ti, Zr). Sample chain of custody documentation was not done, or not acquired in the data package.

Geological mapping of surface rock exposures and interpretation by Buenaventura and Laconia geologists has been used to compile the information in this release. Results for the Española 1 adit channel sampling were composited based on a nominal cut-off of greater than 1 g/t gold, or 60 g/t silver or 0.1 % copper, and then calculated as a weighted average of sample length versus sample grade, divided by the entire composite length. No surface channel sample results were composited.

Government Drill Approvals Received

The Company has had its Declaración de Impacto Ambiental (DIA) ( Environmental Impact Statement ) approved by the Peruvian regulator, the Ministry of Energy and Mines (MINEM)[6] .

Laconia has achieved the necessary Social Licence required for its Kimsa Orcco Project[7] . The concessions at the Kimsa Orcco Project collectively cover over 8,387 hectares of highly prospective geology in the Peruvian Andes.

Formal approval to drill has been gained from the Peruvian regulator, MINEM[8] .

Background

Laconia completed the acquisition of the four Patacancha tenements in the Kimsa Orcco Project[9] in the Southern Andes of Peru in June 2012. Kimsa Orcco Project is an advanced, high-grade gold and silver project which contains existing development levels and cross-cuts. In March 2013, the Company signed a formal option agreement ("the Option Agreement") to add 5,622 hectares,

6 Refer ASX release 29 January 2014

7 Refer ASX release 4 March 2014

8 Refer ASX release 24 April 2014

9 Refer ASX Release 1 June 2012

10

covering 11 Huaco Cucho exploration tenements adjacent to its 100% owned Patacancha tenements. The combined 100% Laconia Patacancha tenements and the 80% Option Agreement Huaco Cucho tenements form the Kimsa Orcco Project. The Option Agreement is for seven years and involves minimal initial outlay.

Previous explorers were aware of the potential scale and size of the Ccarhuaraso Volcanic system and its Porphyry Copper-Gold potential due to the geological similarities to the El-Indio deposit in Peru (Caddy, 1996.) . El Indio contained some 23.2 Mt at 6.6 g/t Au, 50 g/t Ag and 4% Cu including a bonanza gold zone of 200 kt at 209 g/t Au ( Sillitoe, 1999) . The Company has consequently expanded its compilation of historical data to include any available copper sampling undertaken across the Project licences with the view that the Project contains a buried and fully intact Epithermal/Porphyry system. Figure 6 shows a schematic of the exploration model now being used by Laconia. It contains examples of known vein and breccia systems on the Project and the current understanding of how they relate to the Epithermal/Porphyry model.

Laconia continues the process of identifying and verifying all existing and available data from sampling conducted by the Cominco SA and Buenaventura Ingenieros SAC companies and will continue with its process of re-sampling to “twin” existing surface and underground samples and drill holes.

References

Caddy, S.W., 1996, “Preliminary Structural Analysis, Mineral Alteration Zoning, Target Concepts, and Recommended Exploration Approach, Jarhaurazo District, Southern Peru”; unpublished Internal Consulting Report for Echo Bay Exploration Inc.

Sillitoe, R.H., 1999, "Styles of high sulphidation gold, silver and copper mineralisation in the porphyry and epithermal environments"; in G. Weber, ed., Pacrim ’99 Congress Proceedings: Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, pp29-44.

*ENDS***

For further information please contact:

Ian Stuart

Managing Director

Laconia Resources Limited

P: +61 8 9486 1599

E: [email protected]

or visit our website at www.laconia.com.au

11

About Laconia Resources Limited

ASX Listed Laconia Resources Limited (ASX: LCR) is a Perth-based precious and base metals exploration and development Company with a Latin American focus. The Company’s flagship Kimsa Orcco Project in Peru is an advanced copper-gold-silver project in the Ayacucho region of Southern Peru, across four 100% Laconia Resources Ltd permits covering 27.65 km[2] and a further 11 contiguous permits through an 80% earn in option agreement, covering 56.22 km[2] . The total area of 83.87 km[2] hosts the entire Ccarhuaraso volcanic system that is proven to host high sulphidation epithermal copper gold and silver.

In Western Australia, the Company has mineral projects across two granted tenements covering an approximate 98.7 km[2] in the Pilbara and Northern Gascoyne regions.

Competent Persons Statement The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results at the Barita vein is based on information compiled by Mr Vincent Algar, a Competent Person who is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Algar is a consultant for Laconia Resources Limited and has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity currently being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Algar consents to the inclusion in this announcement of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears. Previously released information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is extracted from reports lodged with the ASX titled “High-Grade Copper Identified” dated 27 February 2013, “High-grade Copper at Favi Prospect, Peru” dated 11 March 2014,”Exploration Results Updated to JORC 2012 dated 20 March 2014”, “High-grade Copper Intersection at Española 1 Prospect, Peru” dated 10 June 2014 and “High-grade Copper-Gold-Silver Surface Samples, Peru” dated 18 June 2014. These reports were based upon information compiled by Mr Vincent Algar, a Competent Person who is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Algar is a consultant for Laconia Resources Limited. Mr Algar has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original market announcements. The Company confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original market announcements.

See Appendix 2 for Detailed JORC Table 1, Section 1 and Section 2

12

APPENDIX 1 – Barita Vein – Surface Channel Sampling

Barita vein at Española 1 prospect - Surface channel samples

Sample
ID
Prospect East North RL Dip Azimuth Length
(metres)
Cu % Aug/t Ag g/t
29166 Barita 632,447 8,416,931 4,839 0 240 1.5 0 0.41 4.7
29167 Barita 632,446 8,416,931 4,838 0 240 1.5 0 0.27 3
29168 Barita 632,444 8,416,930 4,836 0 240 1.5 0 0.34 4.4
29169 Barita 632,441 8,416,959 4,826 0 240 1.15 0.01 0.11 2.4
29170 Barita 632,440 8,416,959 4,824 0 240 1.5 0.01 0.2 17.4
29171 Barita 632,439 8,416,958 4,824 0 240 1.5 0.01 0.99 1.6
29172 Barita 632,438 8,416,957 4,823 0 240 1.5 0.01 0.15 1.9
29173 Barita 632,437 8,416,957 4,823 0 240 1.5 0 0.11 1.1
29174 Barita 632,436 8,416,954 4,821 0 240 0.4 0.01 0.23 4.2
29175 Barita 632,435 8,416,956 4,821 0 240 1.5 0 0.1 1.5
29176 Barita 632,433 8,416,954 4,820 0 240 1.5 0 0.09 1.2
29177 Barita 632,426 8,416,955 4,812 0 240 0.5 0.01 5.88 85
29178 Barita 632,427 8,416,953 4,814 0 240 1.3 0.01 0.85 15.8
29179 Barita 632,428 8,416,973 4,813 0 240 0.7 0.03 1.32 60.3
29264 Barita 632,367 8,417,072 4,774 0 0 0.9 0.69 2.91 61.6
29265 Barita 632,369 8,417,065 4,776 0 0 0.9 0.76 2.98 17.3
29266 Barita 632,366 8,417,061 4,775 0 0 0.5 0.34 3.39 48.7
29267 Barita 632,341 8,417,086 4,760 0 0 0.5 0.83 1.96 25.5
29273 Barita 632,323 8,417,135 4,745 0 220 0.5 0.45 9.7 105
29274 Barita 632,322 8,417,134 4,744 0 220 0.5 0.45 3.45 36.6
29275 Barita 632,321 8,417,132 4,745 0 220 0.55 2.2 9.72 68
29276 Barita 632,336 8,417,137 4,747 0 0 1 1.2 0.8 10.6

Note 1: Samples were collected by Buenaventura Ingenieros SAC during 1999 and assayed at Intertek Bondar Clegg, Boliviar. Gold (Au) was analysed by Fire Assay on 50 g aliquots with AAS finish. ICP-MS was used for all other elements.

Note 2: Coordinate system used is PSAD56/UTM zone 18S EPSG 24878

13

APPENDIX 2 – JORC CODE, 2012 Edition, Table 1 (Section 1 and 2)

SECTION 1: Sampling Techniques and Data

SECTION 1: Sampling Techniques and Data SECTION 1: Sampling Techniques and Data SECTION 1: Sampling Techniques and Data
Criteria JORC Explanation Remarks
Sampling
Techniques
Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut
channels, random chips, or specific
specialised
industry
standard
measurement tools appropriate to the
minerals under investigation, such as
down hole gamma sondes, or handheld
XRF instruments, etc). These examples
should not be taken as limiting the broad
meaning of sampling.
Cut surface channel samples – 30 cm width.
Include reference to measures taken to
ensure sample representivity and the
appropriate
calibration
of
any
measurement tools or systems used.
Buenaventura used a sample size of 3.5 kg per metre of channel
sampling. They routinely submitted duplicate and triplicate samples.
The employed umpire laboratories to check their results with triplicate
samples, as well as re-submitting pulps.
Aspects
of
the
determination
of
mineralisation that are Material to the
Public Report. In cases where ‘industry
standard’ work has been done this would
be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation
drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples
from which 3 kg was pulverised to
produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In
other cases more explanation may be
required, such as where there is coarse
gold that has inherent sampling problems.
Unusual commodities or mineralisation
types (eg submarine nodules) may
warrant disclosure of detailed information.
Channel samples were collected using best method (ie. cut with a
rock saw).
Duplicates and triplicates of channel samples (adit and surface) were
obtained through re-cutting a second or third sample in the same
location. Channel samples were not split for the purposes of creating
duplicates or triplicates.
Sample preparation techniques are not known.
Drilling Techniques Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation,
open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger,
Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core
diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of
diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other
type, whether core is oriented and if so, by
what method, etc).
No drilling results are included in this release.
Drill Sample
Recovery
Method of recording and assessing core
and chip sample recoveries and results
assessed.
No drilling results are included in this release.
Measures taken to maximise sample
recovery and ensure representative
nature of the samples.
No drilling results are included in this release.

14

Criteria JORC Explanation Remarks
Drill Sample
recovery (continued)
Whether a relationship exists between
sample recovery and grade and whether
sample bias may have occurred due to
preferential
loss/gain
of
fine/coarse
material
No drilling results are included in this release.
Logging Whether core and chip samples have
been geologically and geotechnically
logged to a level of detail to support
appropriate Mineral Resource estimation,
mining studies and metallurgical studies.
Surface and underground channel samples were plotted onto
geological maps that were created using a consistent legend.
No geotechnical logs are available for channel samples.
Whether
logging
is
qualitative
or
quantitative in nature. Core (or costean,
channel, etc) photography.
Logging is qualitative, with the exception of some quantitative logging
of sulphide and alteration content.
No routine photography of channel sampling is available.
The total length and percentage of the
relevant intersections logged
100% of surface channel samples presented in this release have
mapping that can be applied as logging.
Sub-sampling
Techniques and
Sample Preparation
If core, whether cut or sawn and whether
quarter, half or all core taken.
No core samples are reported in this release.
If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled,
rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet
or dry.
Surface channel samples were not split during any part of the
process. They represent complete channels. Water was used
during cutting, but then a dry sample collected using a hammer and
maul.
For all sample types, the nature, quality
and appropriateness of the sample
preparation technique.
Details on laboratory preparation of samples are not known.
Accuracy of results is implied through performance of duplicate and
triplicate samples and utilisation of umpire laboratories.
Quality control procedures adopted for all
sub-sampling
stages
to
maximise
representivity of samples.
For channel sampling standards and blanks were interleaved with the
routine samples, every 20
thsample.
For the channel sampling, duplicates were cut for every 20
thsample.
Triplicates were cut and sent to an umpire lab, at a frequency of
about 3%.
Measures taken to ensure that the
sampling is representative of the in situ
material collected, including for instance
results for field duplicate/second-half
sampling.
Duplicates and triplicates were collected through cutting another
channel sample, not splitting the existing channel sample.
5% of total sample numbers were submitted as duplicates, and 2.5%
were submitted as triplicates.
Whether sample sizes are appropriate to
the grain size of the material being
sampled
Channel sample sizes were appropriate, as shown by good
correlation between primary, duplicate and triplicate results.
Quality of Assay
Data and Laboratory
Tests
The nature, quality and appropriateness
of the assaying and laboratory procedures
used and whether the technique is
considered partial or total.
For channel samples gold (Au) was analysed by AAS with Fire Assay
checks on 50 g aliquots to 2 ppb detection limits and AAS was used
for Silver (Ag). ICP-MS was used for the other elements (Cu, Pb, Zn,
Mo, As, Sb, Bi, Hg, Te). Digestion method is not known and so
completeness oftechniqueis unknown.
For geophysical tools, spectrometers,
handheld XRF instruments, etc, the
parameters used in determining the
analysis including instrument make and
model, reading times, calibrations factors
applied and their derivation, etc.
No geophysical tools or other analysis methods were employed.
Nature of quality control procedures
adopted
(eg
standards,
blanks,
duplicates, external laboratory checks)
and
whether
acceptable
levels
of
accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision
_have been established. _
For both channel sampling, standards and blanks were interleaved
with the routine samples, every 20
thsample.
For the channel sampling, duplicates were cut for every 20
thsample.
Triplicates were cut and sent to an umpire laboratory (at a frequency
of about 3%).

15

Criteria JORC Explanation Remarks
Verification of
Sampling and
Assaying
The verification of significant intersections
by either independent or alternative
company personnel.
No intersection verification at Barita prospect has been done, though
Buenaventura repeating Cominco sampling at other prospects, and
Cambridge Mineral Resources repeated Cominco and Buenaventura
sampling at a later date. Laconia repeated Cominco and Cambridge
Mineral Resources sampling (33 samples) in the Rasuhuilca
underground development, and the results showed the original
sampling was repeatable. Laconia have now repeated surface
sampling at Española 1 and Fortuna prospects with comparable
results, further validating the historic dataset.
The use of twinned holes. No twinned holes have been used to verify sampling and assaying.
Documentation of primary data, data entry
procedures, data verification, data storage
(physical and electronic) protocols.
Data has been compiled from good quality paper plans and digitally
compiled at a later date.
The data has been assimilated into the Company SQL database,
and exported into Microsoft Access, after compilation and validation
in Surpac and Mapinfo Software and checks against topography and
the quality of repeated samplelocations.
Discuss any adjustment to assay data. Gold values were converted from ppb to ppm from original assay
certificates.
Location of Data
Points
Accuracy and quality of surveys used to
locate drill holes (collar and down-hole
surveys), trenches, mine workings and
other locations used in Mineral Resource
estimation.
Cominco established professionally surveyed trigonometric points
across the Rasuhuilca project. From these survey points, surface
mapping and sampling was spatially referenced. Underground
development at Rasuhuilca was surveyed by Cominco, with
permanent survey points established in the adits.
Following workers (Buenaventura, Cambridge Mineral Resources,
Laconia Resources) utilised these survey points for spatial location of
their work. Buenaventura used a company employed surveyor. Only
the Rasuhuilca underground development sampling and surface
samplinginforms aresource estimation.
Specification of the grid system used. All data was collected as, and remain in, PSAD56, Zone 18 South,
EPSG24878.
Quality and adequacy of topographic
control.
Topographic surface uses 10 metre contours that have excellent
correlationto groundfeatures.
Data Spacing and
Distribution
Data spacing for reporting of Exploration
Results.
Surface channel samples are collected perpendicular to the vein
walls or across zones of alteration, at spacings of 5 to 100 metres
apart.
Whether the data spacing and distribution
is sufficient to establish the degree of
geological
and
grade
continuity
appropriate for the Mineral Resource and
Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and
classifications applied.
No Mineral Resource or Ore Reserve calculations have been
reported on the Española 1 prospect.
Whether sample compositing has been
applied.
No compositing was done for surface channel samples.
Orientation of data in
relation to geological
structure
Whether the orientation of sampling
achieves unbiased sampling of possible
structures and the extent to which this is
_known, considering the deposit type. _
Surface channel samples were collected perpendicular to vein walls,
or across zones of alteration, and are representative of the
mineralisation controls.
If the relationship between the drilling
orientation and the orientation of key
mineralised structures is considered to
have introduced a sampling bias, this
should be assessed and reported if
material.
No drilling is reported in this release.
Sample security The measures taken to ensure sample
security.
No chain of custody was documented for Buenaventura Ingenieros
SAC sampling.
Audits or reviews The results of any audits or reviews of
sampling techniques and data.
At a project scale, numerous repeat sampling exercises validate the
sampling of previous workers.

16

SECTION 2: Reporting of Exploration Results

SECTION 2: Reporting of Exploration Results SECTION 2: Reporting of Exploration Results SECTION 2: Reporting of Exploration Results
Criteria JORC Explanation Remarks
Mineral tenement
and land tenure
status
Type, reference name/number, location
and ownership including agreements or
material issues with third parties such as
joint ventures, partnerships, overriding
royalties, native title interests, historical
sites, wilderness or national park and
environmental settings.
The Kimsa Orcco Project is comprised of 4 Patacancha tenements that
are 100% Laconia Resources owned, plus the 11 Huaco Cucho
tenements that are subject to an Earn-in Agreement, for option of 80%
interest over a 7 year period.
The Española 1 prospect is within the 100% Laconia Resources
tenement, Patacancha 3. Barita vein (that is part of the Española 1
prospect) is within an Earn-In Agreement tenement, Huaco Cucho No.
2.
The tenements are located on a high plateau within the Andes
Mountain chain, in the Department of Ayacucho in Southern Peru.
There are no historical sites, wilderness or national park issues known
to Laconia Resources. Community agreements to address Native Title
issues are completed; all3required agreementshave beenachieved.
The security of the tenure held at the time
of reporting along with any known
impediments to obtaining a licence to
operate in the area.
Laconia knows of no impediment to obtaining a licence to operate in the
area.
Exploration Done by
Other Parties
Acknowledgement
and
appraisal
of
exploration by other parties.
The project area has previously been explored by Cominco el Peru
between 1985 and 1987, by Buenaventura Ingenieros SA from 1996 to
2003. Echo Bay undertook exploration in a JV partnership with
Buenaventura between 1996 and 1999.
Cambridge Mineral Resources (CMR) acquired the project in 2005 and
started development and small-scale mining at the Marcelita 2 vein.
Theymovedfocus to theRasuhuilcavein inSeptember 2006.
Geology Deposit type, geological setting and style
of mineralisation.
High sulphidation epithermal gold-silver veining and alteration halos,
with localised enargite-rich breccias along fault controlled paths.
Alteration of the volcanic rocks (Andesite, Dacite and Intermediate
Tuffs)is dated at1.4 – 1.6Ma.
Drill hole Information A summary of all information material to
the understanding of the exploration
results including a tabulation of the
following information for all Material drill
holes:
• easting and northing of the drill hole
collar
• elevation or RL (Reduced Level –
elevation above sea level in metres) of
the drill hole collar
• dip and azimuth of the hole
• down hole length and interception depth
• hole length.
All tabulated exploration results are included in the release in appendix
1.
Channel samples are presented on plans that show the orientation of
the sample line.
If the exclusion of this information is
justified on the basis that the information
is not Material and this exclusion does not
detract from the understanding of the
report, the Competent Person should
clearly explain why this is the case.
No information is excluded.
Data Aggregate
Methods
In reporting Exploration Results, weighting
averaging techniques, maximum and/or
minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of
high grades) and cut-off grades are
usually Material and should be stated.
No compositing is applied.
No top or bottom cut was applied.
Where aggregate intercepts incorporate
short lengths of high grade results and
longer lengths of low grade results, the
procedure used for such aggregation
should be stated and some typical
examples of such aggregations should be
shown indetail.
No aggregate methods are used for new results in this release.
The assumptions used for any reporting
of metal equivalent values should be
clearly stated.
No metal equivalents are used for the exploration results.

17

Criteria JORC Explanation Remarks
Relationship
between
mineralisation widths
and intercept lengths
These
relationships
are
particularly
important in the reporting of Exploration
Results.
Surface channel samples reflect close to vein true widths as they are
cut perpendicular to the vein walls.
If the geometry of the mineralisation with
respect to the drill hole angle is known, its
_nature should be reported. _
No new drilling is reported in this release.
If it is not known and only the down hole
lengths are reported, there should be a
clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down
hole length, true width not known’).
No new drilling is reported in this release.
Diagrams Appropriate maps and sections (with
scales) and tabulations of intercepts
should be included for any significant
discovery being reported These should
include, but not be limited to a plan view of
drill hole collar locations and appropriate
_sectional views. _
Diagrams are provided that show all surface channel sample locations
and known geology.
Balanced Reporting Where comprehensive reporting of all
Exploration Results is not practicable,
representative reporting of both low and
high grades and/or widths should be
practiced to avoid misleading reporting of
_Exploration Results. _
All exploration results are presented in the Appendix 1, regardless of
grade.
Other substantive
exploration data
Other exploration data, if meaningful and
material, should be reported including (but
not limited to):
geological observations; geological survey
results, geochemical survey results; bulk
samples – size and method of treatment;
metallurgical test results; bulk density,
groundwater, geotechnical and rock
characteristics; potential deleterious or
contaminating substances.
Discussion of the Española 1 and Barita vein geology is included in the
release.
To date no economic or extractive measures such as bulk samples,
metallurgical testing, bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical or rock
samples have been done.
Mineral species hosting base metals are identified in the release.
Further Work The nature and scale of planned further
work (eg tests for lateral extensions or
depth extensions or large-scale step-out
drilling).
Drill testing is identified as future planned work. At present the amount
and location of planned drill holes has not been identified, pending 3D
geological modelling
Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of
possible extensions, including the main
geological
interpretations
and
future
drilling areas, provided this information is
_not commercially sensitive. _
The area of mineralisation in the context of the known geology is
outlined in Figures 1, 2, 3, and 4.

18