AI assistant
Zalando SE — Remuneration Information 2023
Mar 8, 2023
499_cgr_2023-03-08_5627c6a9-f5a5-4a9d-b5b0-dc7ca8b1a805.pdf
Remuneration Information
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
$1.3$ Remuneration report
The remuneration report describes the features of the remuneration system and remuneration for individual current and former members of the Management Board and the Supervisory Board of Zalando for the fiscal year 2022 in accordance with Section 162 AktG (German Stock Corporation Act) and the recommendations of the German Corporate Governance Code.
$1.3.1$ Introduction
Zalando is always evolving and thrives on entrepreneurial spirit. Our ambition has led to remarkable growth and value creation that have taken the company from a startup to the stock exchange in near record time. DAX-listed and founder-led, Zalando's story is still at the beginning, and we are continuing to pursue our vision to be the starting point for fashion.
Our progress continues to be driven by the distinctive qualities that have differentiated our approach from the beginning: customer focus, entrepreneurship, speed and empowerment. Established as our Founding Mindset, these qualities have been and will continue to be the critical ingredient in our long-term success and achievement of our goal to reimagine fashion for the good of all.
Our Founding Mindset defines who we are and sets us apart from the competition. Our entrepreneurial spirit means we remain dissatisfied with the status quo but we know that, ultimately, sustainable progress at scale depends on all Zalandos acting like owners - from our founders to new joiners. Whether at Zalando for ten years or ten days, we want all Zalandos to feel like entrepreneurs – to be proud of the company's progress and to feel they share in its success. Entrepreneurship is at the core of how we think about working together, how we innovate for our customers and partners, and how we compensate employees for the time and energy they dedicate to the company.
These qualities helped us in 2022, when we and the wider industry were confronted with new and fast-moving challenges. The war in Ukraine has caused immense suffering and added to geopolitical tensions the world over. A rapid rise in inflation with significant increases in energy and logistics costs have meant consumers had less disposable income. Supply-chain bottlenecks and a shift in global trade led to a volatile trading environment. Faster-than-expected tightening of monetary policy roiled stock markets.
While this also impacted our share price and financial results Zalando successfully adapted to the new environment. We made great efforts to protect profitability from a volatile trading environment and macroeconomic headwinds. This approach will be supported by a refined remuneration for management board members that are appointed from 2023 onwards and will include adjusted EBIT margin as an extra financial key performance indicator (KPI).
$1.3.2$ Background
Our success story is deeply rooted in our culture and drive for innovation which we attribute in no small part to Zalando continuing to be founder-led by Robert Gentz and David Schneider as Co-CEOs.
Our Co-CEOs have a relevant stake in Zalando of 5.14%, underlining their strong continuous commitment to Zalando's long-term health and success. And across all levels of the organization, we want employees to share Our Founding Mindset and commitment by owning a stake in Zalando's future. This is enabled either through stock options as part of compensation packages or through our employee participation program, which is widely adopted among Zalando employees.
The Supervisory Board considers the remuneration framework a crucial element that supports and nurtures Our Founding Mindset in senior management and connects it closely to our corporate strategy and growth ambitions. The remuneration framework ties the long-term financial success of the members of the Management Board closely to the long-term success of Zalando.
Over the years, Zalando has grown at a rapid pace, and the remuneration frameworks have always reflected the stage of development of the company at each moment in time. As a result, some remuneration components of our former Management Board member Rubin Ritter settled in 2022 date back to share-based compensation plans from 2013. In 2013 Zalando had about EUR 1.7bn in revenue and option strike prices in our compensation plans were considerably higher than in the two prior years when we were still loss making.
It is also important to note that the entrepreneurial risk and return profile remains reflected in all remuneration systems. For example, the challenging macroeconomic developments in 2022 had an impact on share based compensation. But we still believe that share-based compensation was and remains an important incentive to support the future success of the company and over the years, we refined our remuneration frameworks further.
In 2021, the annual general meeting approved the current remuneration system reflecting the next step in the evolution of our compensation framework commensurate with the stage of our development. The current remuneration system is closely linked to the progress of our platform strategy, profitable growth ambitions and ESG targets - with a strong focus on shareholder value creation.
And from 2023 onwards, adjusted EBIT margin will be added as an extra financial KPI in line with the current remuneration system. This way, the performance of the Management Board is also measured by whether it contributes to increasing our profitability in the long-term in line with our overall strategy.
$1.3.3$ Changes in the composition of the Management Board and Supervisory Board during 2022
In the fiscal year 2022, Robert Gentz and David Schneider continued to lead our company as Co-CEOs. Dr. Astrid Arndt (CPO), Jim Freeman (CBPO) and David Schröder also continued to be members of the Management Board during the reporting period. When Dr. Sandra Dembeck newly joined our Management Board as of March 1, 2022, she took over the position as CFO from David Schröder who became the company's COO.
The composition of our Supervisory Board remained unchanged during the fiscal year 2022.
$1.3.4$ Management Board remuneration
Procedure for determining the remuneration system for the Management Board
The remuneration system for the Management Board of Zalando is resolved by the Supervisory Board in accordance with Section 87a (1) AktG. The Supervisory Board is supported in this by its remuneration committee. The remuneration committee develops recommendations for the remuneration system for the members of the Management Board, taking into account our long-term strategy, design principles, the legal requirements, the requirements of the German Corporate Governance Code as well as feedback and recommendations from investors and proxy advisors and submits them to the entire Supervisory Board for discussion and resolution.
In order to assess whether the remuneration of the individual members of the Management Board is in line with market practice, the Supervisory Board benchmarks it with the remuneration paid to the management boards of a group of comparable companies to be determined by the Supervisory Board, taking into account the market position (including market capitalization, revenue, industry, size and country) and the overall financial position of the respective company. In addition, the Supervisory Board considers the level of remuneration of the members of the Management Board in relation to the remuneration structure within the company.
As a matter of principle, the Supervisory Board and its remuneration committee consult external experts to develop the remuneration system and to assess the appropriateness of the remuneration - which has also been applied for the development and assessment of the appropriateness of the remuneration system 2021. The remuneration expert is rotated from time to time and when consulting an external remuneration expert, the Supervisory Board ensures that the remuneration expert is independent of the Management Board and the company.
The remuneration system is submitted to the general meeting for approval in the case of any material change, but at least every four years. If the general meeting does not approve the remuneration system, a reviewed remuneration system will be submitted for approval at the latest at the following annual general meeting. The remuneration system is regularly reviewed by the Supervisory Board, supported by its remuneration committee.
Throughout the process of determining, implementing and reviewing the remuneration system, the requirements of the AktG and the Supervisory Board's rules of procedure as well as the recommendations of the German Corporate Governance Code on the avoidance and handling of conflicts of interest are carefully respected.
Current remuneration system for the Management Board ("remuneration system 2021")
The current remuneration system for the Management Board has been approved by the company's annual general meeting on May 19, 2021, and came into effect as of June 1, 2021 (the "remuneration system 2021").
The remuneration system 2021 follows our remuneration philosophy of tying entrepreneurial culture, strategy progression and growth ambitions together in a competitive remuneration framework. It applies for members of the Management Board who are newly appointed or whose existing appointments were renewed after June 1, 2021. The Supervisory Board fully applied the remuneration system 2021 to the service agreements of Dr. Astrid Arndt, who was newly appointed to the Management Board on April 1, 2021, and to Dr. Sandra Dembeck, who joined the Management Board on March 1, 2022, as Chief Financial Officer. It has also been applied at the reappointment of the Management Board member David Schröder to his service agreement for the new tenure starting as of April 1, 2023 and expiring on March 30, 2027.
Guiding principles
For the design and development of the remuneration system 2021 the Supervisory Board applied guiding principles to create an incentive for results-oriented and sustainable corporate management that fully aligns with the strategy and the long-term success of Zalando. The Supervisory Board's objective is to offer the members of the Management Board a competitive remuneration package that allows us to attract the best global candidates for a position on our Management Board and retain the existing members of the Management Board, including the co-founders and Co-CEOs. At the same time, the Supervisory Board seeks to maintain sufficient flexibility to react to structural changes and different market conditions.
Despite the changed macroeconomic circumstances since the creation of the remuneration system 2021 we still believe that it contributes significantly to the execution and promotion of the business strategy, as well as the long-term and sustainable development of the Zalando group. In our view it ensures remuneration that is appropriate and at market standard for the members of the Management Board, in order to attract and retain the talent required to achieve our strategic ambitions. Remuneration is based on performance targets and considers in our opinion appropriately the performance of each member of the Management Board. In this context, we believe that actions of the members of the Management Board are oriented towards the interests of shareholders, resulting e.g. in no or considerably lower payouts of variable compensation in the case of a declining share price or moderate payouts in the case of moderate share price increases. The fixed integration of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) targets into the remuneration structure encourages sustainable and futureoriented action. Such targets are deeply rooted in our sustainability (do MORE) as well as diversity and inclusion (do BETTER) strategies and can lower the number of LTI shares or options by up to 20 percentage points if targets are not achieved. The overall structure is further designed to promote an entrepreneurial culture of ownership and risk-taking in the Management Board and across the company. The system, however, allows for flexibility to tap into a wide talent market.
| Business strategy | Promotion of the business strategy as well as the long-term and sustainable development of ZALANDO SE and the Zalando group |
|---|---|
| Appropriate and market standard remuneration |
Ensuring an appropriate and market standard remuneration for the members of the Management Board to allow the Company to attract. incentivize and retain the specific type of talent and leadership required for its strategic ambitions |
| Ambitious performance targets |
Definition of ambitious performance targets and appropriate consideration of the performance of the members of the Management Board (pay for performance) |
| Focus on shareholder value creation |
Orientation of the actions of the members of the Management Board towards the interest of the shareholders |
| Linked to ESG criteria | Consideration of sustainability and environmental social governance (ESG) aspects to ensure social and future-oriented action |
| Entrepreneurial culture | Promotion of entrepreneurial culture |
Investor and proxy advisor feedback
The remuneration system 2021 was set up with the support of market-leading compensation experts and takes into account the feedback of investors and proxy advisors.
Its design ensures strong alignment between remuneration and communicated strategy targets, appropriate remuneration levels reflecting market standards for all Management Board members, performance targets that do not reward failure, malus and clawback rules and incentives to over-achieve targets.
We do not believe in short-term oriented compensation but we follow the philosophy that compensation should be tied to the long-term success of the company. Against this backdrop, the Supervisory Board decided against the introduction of a traditional Short-Term Incentive (STI) as a variable remuneration component and instead adhered to the Zalando Ownership Plan (ZOP) as one variable remuneration component, despite the absence of performance criteria. We remain convinced that the ZOP is a better fit than any other short-term oriented compensation element and strengthens the philosophy of all senior leadership levels across Zalando acting as one team, given the ZOP already applies to all leadership levels. We continue to believe the ZOP provides, inter alia, an equity incentive comparable to what many international talents are accustomed to - enabling Zalando to recruit the best talent for the company. While both ZOP options and ZOP shares vest immediately with grant, the options have a waiting period of two years.
The remuneration system 2021 was passed by the annual general meeting 2021 with 72.27% of the votes. Following the annual general meeting 2021, the Supervisory Board considered the criticism of the remuneration system 2021, mainly due to the lack of a traditional Short-Term Incentive linked to a performance criterion. It nevertheless decided not to amend the remuneration system 2021 and to keep the ZOP as part of the variable remuneration. As outlined above we do not believe in short-term oriented compensation and support the alignment of Management Board and wider leadership levels through the uniform application of the ZOP.
The remuneration report for the fiscal year 2021 was approved by the annual general meeting 2022 with 60.28% of the votes cast. As it follows from the investor feedback we received, the shareholder approval rate does primarily relate to the content and not the formal quality including clarity and comprehensibility of the remuneration report.
The Supervisory Board will keep taking the shareholder feedback into account when further developing the remuneration system going forward.
Current remuneration system 2021
At a glance
The current remuneration system 2021 consists of a fixed base salary, customary fringe benefits, and two variable remuneration components: the Zalando Ownership Plan (ZOP) and a Long-Term Incentive program (LTI).
The ZOP is based on a variable incentive plan which has been in place since 2019 for all of our leaders and has been introduced to the remuneration system for the members of the Management Board to promote the alignment of the remuneration of the members of the Management Board with the Zalando's overall remuneration philosophy.
The LTI is a performance-related remuneration component which is linked to our strategic financial performance targets and, through the introduction of an ESG modifier, its sustainable development. For each performance period, the Supervisory Board defines measurable, and transparent ESG targets on the basis of our ESG strategy. In selecting the specific ESG targets, the Supervisory Board pays particular attention to relevance and measurability of the targets based on the underlying ESG strategy which is subject to continuous evolution.
At the re-appointment of David Schröder as Management Board member for a four years' term starting after the end of his tenure, on April 1, 2023, the Supervisory Board has decided to add profitability (adjusted EBIT margin) as second financial performance target next to growth (GMV) in the respective service agreement. This decision in line with the remuneration system 2021 and our long-term strategy was taken to even further incentivize the Management Board to achieve profitable growth of Zalando's business.
The amount of the variable remuneration of the members of the Management Board under both variable remuneration components is directly tied to the development of our share price, thereby linking the interests of the members of the Management Board with those of the shareholders. The fixed integration of ESG targets into the remuneration structure encourages sustainable and future-oriented action for Zalando.
The LTI is 60% of the total target remuneration for members of the Management Board. The remaining 40% can be designed flexibly, depending on personal circumstances and preferences: A minimum of 10% and a maximum of 40% of the target total compensation is represented by the fixed base salary. Consequently, the ZOP makes up between 0% and 30% of target total compensation, traded-off with the fixed base salary.
Composition as % of target total remuneration
We believe the remuneration system 2021 for the members of the Management Board is clear and comprehensible. It complies with the requirements of Section 87a AktG and with the recommendations of the German Corporate Governance Code with the exception of the disclosed deviation from the recommendation in G.7 of the German Corporate Governance Code.
Maximum remuneration
In the remuneration system 2021, the Supervisory Board has determined a maximum remuneration in accordance with Section 87a (1) Sentence 2 No. 1 AktG. The total maximum remuneration for one fiscal year considers all remuneration components received for such fiscal year (in particular the fixed annual salary, the fringe benefits, the inflow value under the ZOP as well as the pro rata inflow value under the LTI), regardless of whether the payout occurs in this fiscal year or at a later date.
The maximum remuneration for one fiscal year is based on the pro rata inflow value for the LTI after the expiry of the four-year waiting period for each fiscal year and the respective maximum limits for variable remuneration - amounting to EUR 15.75m for a CEO and to EUR 10.5m for ordinary members of the Management Board.
In addition to the total maximum remuneration in accordance with Section 87a (1) Sentence 2 No. 1 AktG, the settlement values of the variable remuneration components provided for under the remuneration system 2021 (LTI 2021, LTI 2021/2022, ZOP 2021) are capped at a maximum amount per option (see 1.3.5 Long-Term Incentive 2021/2022 (LTI 2021/2022), applicable to Dr. Astrid Arndt and Dr. Sandra Dembeck, for details). The total maximum remuneration is also applicable for David Schröder for his tenure starting April 1, 2023. Besides that, the service agreements of the members of the Management Board provide for a cap on fringe benefits in the amount of EUR 25,000 to EUR 30,000 gross per year.
Malus and clawback regulations
In the case of a willful or grossly negligent serious breach of the obligations pursuant to Section 93 AktG or internal compliance policies and behavioral guidelines or severe compliance infringements by a member of the Management Board, the Supervisory Board may, at its sole discretion, retain in whole or in part variable remuneration that has not been paid out (malus).
In such a case, the Supervisory Board may further, at its sole discretion, reclaim in whole or in part variable remuneration that has already been paid out (clawback). Further, the Supervisory Board has the possibility to reclaim variable remuneration in the case of an undue payout based on incorrect information.
Overview of Management Board remuneration in 2022
Expenses in 2022
The following table shows the total expenses recognized in 2022 for the fixed remuneration of the Management Board within the consolidated income statement of the group. For multiyear variable share-based payment plans the table also shows the expenses in accordance with IFRS 2 as this best represents the allocation of the multi-year remuneration components over the period these are earned. Within other expenses the table includes the sign-on bonus for Dr. Sandra Dembeck and also includes expenses recognized to indemnify Jim Freeman for negative tax consequences under Section 409A of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code.
| Robert Gentz, Co-CEO | David Schneider, Co-CEO | Rubin Ritter, Co-CEO (until June 1, 2021) |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IN EUR | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | |
| Fixed remuneration | 78,385 | 78.045 | 78,389 | 78,305 | $\qquad \qquad \blacksquare$ | 37,983 | |
| Equity-settled share-based payment transactions (IFRS 2 expenses) |
1.755.712 | 2.886.568 | 1.755.712 | 2.886.568 | $\blacksquare$ | 1,327,365 | |
| Other expenses | $\overline{\phantom{0}}$ | $\overline{\phantom{0}}$ | |||||
| Total expenses | 1,834,097 | 2,964,613 | 1,834,100 | 2,964,873 | $\blacksquare$ | 1.365.348 |
| Dr. Sandra Dembeck, CFO (since March 1, 2022) |
David Schröder, COO | Dr. Astrid Arndt, CPO (since April 1, 2021) |
Jim Freeman, CBPO | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 |
| 497,117 | $\overline{\phantom{0}}$ | 519,012 | 520,739 | 503,339 | 381,250 | 820,266 | 821,674 |
| 1.334.741 | 465.952 | 996.936 | 1.543.819 | 1.509.603 | 977.702 | 2.175.860 | |
| 500,000 | $\overline{\phantom{0}}$ | - | - | - | 288.035 | ||
| 2,331,857 | $\blacksquare$ | 984,963 | 1,517,675 | 2,047,158 | 1,890,853 | 2,086,004 | 2,997,534 |
Remuneration awarded and due in 2022 (Section 162 (1) Sentence 1 AktG)
The table below shows the remuneration awarded and due (gewährte und geschuldete Vergütung) to the current and former members of the Management Board during their term of appointment in the corresponding fiscal year, including their relative share in accordance with Section 162 (1) Sentence 2 No. 1 AktG. The remuneration includes all amounts actually received (gewährte Vergütung) as well as all amounts legally due but not yet received (geschuldete Vergütung). This includes the annual fixed compensation and fringe benefits paid out in the fiscal year 2022 (and 2021 respectively), remuneration received for variable remuneration components, particularly for virtual options exercised in the fiscal year 2022 (and 2021 respectively) as well as payments received in the fiscal year 2022 (and 2021 respectively) with respect to tax indemnifications and one time payments (sign-on bonus).
In addition to the remuneration awarded and due - and in accordance with practice in prior years - the table also includes remuneration resulting from the exercise of stock options in the fiscal year 2022 (and 2021 respectively).
Remuneration of the members of the Management Board
| Robert Gentz, Co-CEO | David Schneider, Co-CEO | Rubin Ritter, Co-CEO (until June 1, 2021) |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IN EUR | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | |
| Fixed remuneration | |||||||
| Base salary | 65,000 | 65,000 | 65,000 | 65,000 | 27,264 | ||
| Fringe benefits | 13,385 | 13,045 | 13,389 | 13,305 | 10,719 | ||
| Total fixed | 78,385 | 78,045 | 78,389 | 78,305 | 37,983 | ||
| Variable remuneration | |||||||
| One-year variable*** | |||||||
| Multi-year variable | |||||||
| VSOP 2018 | $\overline{a}$ | ||||||
| LTI 2018** | |||||||
| LTI 2019 | - | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | - | $\overline{\phantom{0}}$ | |||
| 409A tax indemnification |
|||||||
| Total variable | $\overline{\phantom{0}}$ | ۰ | $\overline{\phantom{0}}$ | $\overline{\phantom{0}}$ | |||
| Remuneration awarded and due according to Section 162 (1) Sentence 1 AktG |
78,385 | 78,045 | 78,389 | 78,305 | 37,983 | ||
| Proportion of fixed remuneration* |
100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | ||
| Proportion of variable remuneration* |
|||||||
| Remuneration from exercise of stock options |
|||||||
| SOP 2011 | 6,029,628 | ||||||
| SOP 2013 | - | 45,380,914 | $\qquad \qquad$ | 45,380,914 | $\overline{\phantom{0}}$ | 36,442,552 | |
| Total remuneration | 78,385 | 45,458,959 | 78,389 | 45,459,219 | 42,510,163 |
*) The proportion of fixed and variable remuneration in relation to the total remuneration does not reflect the relative proportions indicated in the remuneration system 2021 as the latter are based on the total target re
$\overline{a}$
| Dr. Sandra Dembeck, CFO (since March 1, 2022) |
David Schröder, CFO | Dr. Astrid Arndt, CPO (since April 1, 2021) |
Jim Freeman, CBPO | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 |
| 479,167 | 500,000 | 500,000 | 480,847 | 360,693 | 800,000 | 800,000 | |
| 17,950 | 19,012 | 20,739 | 22,492 | 20,557 | 20,266 | 21,674 | |
| 497,117 | 519,012 | 520,739 | 503,339 | 381,250 | 820,266 | 821,674 | |
| 500,000 | $\overline{\phantom{0}}$ | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | $\overline{\phantom{0}}$ | $\overline{\phantom{0}}$ | $\overline{\phantom{0}}$ | ||
| 227,306 | 6,060,444 | ||||||
| 13,892,943 | - | 2,197,470 | 5,477,604 | ||||
| - | $\qquad \qquad -$ | 2,398,232 | 503,000 | ||||
| 500,000 | 13,892,943 | - | 4,823,008 | 12,041,048 | |||
| 997,117 | $\blacksquare$ | 519,012 | 14,413,682 | 503,339 | 381,250 | 5,643,274 | 12,862,722 |
| 997,117 | $\blacksquare$ | 519,012 | 14,413,682 | 503,339 | 381,250 | 5,643,274 | 12,862,722 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $\overline{\phantom{m}}$ | ۰ | $\qquad \qquad -$ | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | $\overline{\phantom{0}}$ | $\qquad \qquad$ | $\overline{\phantom{0}}$ | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ |
| $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | $\qquad \qquad -$ | $\overline{\phantom{0}}$ | $\qquad \qquad$ | $\overline{\phantom{0}}$ | - | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | |
| 50.1% | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | $\sim$ | 96.4% | $\overline{\phantom{m}}$ | $\overline{\phantom{m}}$ | 85.5% | 93.6% |
| 49.9% | $\sim$ | 100.0% | $3.6\%$ | 100.0% | 100.0% | 14.5% | 6.4% |
In addition, the following table shows the remuneration awarded and due as well as remuneration according to option exercises in the fiscal year 2022 (and 2021 respectively) for a former member of the Management Board received after the end of its service agreement. The option exercises of the former member of the Management Board in the years 2021 and 2022 date back to pre-IPO stock option programs (SOP 2013) granted in 2013 which were awarded and due in 2013 according to Section 162 (1) Sentence 1 AktG. The exercises of the SOP 2013 program were settled in conditional capital so as not to draw cash from Zalando, which was instead invested into further growing the business. Thus, these options represent and were granted for (performance) periods between 2013 and 2017, hence well before the reporting year 2022 when the company was at an early stage of its development.
Remuneration of the former member of the Management Board
| Rubin Ritter, Co-CEO (after June 1, 2021) |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| IN EUR | 2022 | 2021 | |
| Fixed remuneration | |||
| Base salary | |||
| Fringe benefits | 12,800 | 6,530 | |
| Total fixed | 12,800 | 6,530 | |
| Variable remuneration | |||
| One-year variable | |||
| Multi-year variable | |||
| Total variable | |||
| Remuneration awarded and due according to Section 162 (1) Sentence 1 AktG |
12,800 | 6,530 | |
| Proportion of fixed remuneration | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| Proportion of variable remuneration | |||
| Remuneration received from exercise of stock options | |||
| SOP 2013 | 14,220,059 | 46,555,000 | |
| Total remuneration | 14,232,859 | 46,561,530 |
The current and former members of the Management Board did not receive any compensation from other group companies in fiscal year 2022 (and 2021 respectively).
The compensation components of each member of the Management Board as well as the explanation of how the compensation complies with the relevant remuneration system, how it promotes the long-term development of the company and how the performance criteria have been applied is described in detail in the following sections.
29
30
$1.3.5$ Overview of other remuneration systems applicable during the reporting period
As stated above, the remuneration system 2021 is applicable to all service agreements for members of the Management Board who are newly appointed or whose appointments are renewed after the effective date June 1, 2021. It has been hence applied to the appointment of Dr. Sandra Dembeck, who joined the Management Board on March 1, 2022 and to the reappointment of David Schröder for a new tenure that will start as of April 1, 2023 and end on March 30, 2027. The remuneration system 2021 had also already been applied to Dr. Astrid Arndt's appointment to the Management Board as of April 1, 2021.
For existing service agreements concluded before June 2021, the existing remuneration arrangements as agreed in the existing service agreements continued to apply during the reporting year in accordance with Section 26j (1) EGAktG (Introductory Act to the Stock Corporation Act) and the rationale of the German Corporate Governance Code, in particular in order to avoid modifications to the already granted Long-Term Incentive plans with a multiyear assessment basis.
The remuneration system for the Co-CEOs, Robert Gentz and David Schneider, and the former Co-CEO, Rubin Ritter, who resigned from the Management Board with effect as of June 1, 2021, was approved by the Supervisory Board and the annual general meeting in May 2018. In due consideration of the feedback received from investors, the service agreements with the Co-CEOs that implemented the remuneration system were concluded in August 2018 for a five-year term commencing on December 1, 2018. The remuneration system for the Co-CEOs also served as the basis for assessing the remuneration of Jim Freeman and David Schröder, when they were appointed to the Management Board in 2019.
Although there are certain differences between the compensation packages issued in 2018 and 2019 that reflect the various roles, they share in principle the same or similar elements (e.g. compensation components, type of options) and underlying mechanics (e.g. performance hurdle). The Supervisory Board continues to believe that the entrepreneurial risk and return profile reflected in those former (still applicable) remuneration systems for the Co-CEOs as well as the CFO and CBPO still fit our needs as a company that has shown high growth over the past vears.
The following detailed tables for each variable remuneration program include inter alia, the information on the number of options granted and exercised during the reporting period as well as the performance measurement of the performance criteria applicable to the stock options exercised during the reporting period.
Remuneration components applicable in 2022 (Section 162 (1) Sentence 2 No. 1, 3 AktG)
Fixed remuneration components
During the reporting year, the current members of the Management Board received a fixed base salary which was paid in monthly installments. In addition, the current and former members of the Management Board were entitled to non-cash payments (such as the use of company cars) and other fringe benefits, including reimbursement of standard expenses, contributions towards health insurance, and monthly gross amounts that correspond to the employer's contributions to the statutory pension and unemployment insurance.
Variable remuneration components
During the reporting period, the variable remuneration of each current member of the Management Board was based on Long-Term Incentive programs (LTI) granting virtual option rights, which are linked to the performance of the company under its long-term growth strategy and to the development of the share price, creating a strong link to the shareholders' interests. In addition, the most recent Long-Term Incentive program LTI 2021/2022 includes strategic ESG targets which incentivize and reward sustainable corporate management and social responsibility. Under the remuneration system 2021, a second variable incentive component was introduced, the Zalando Ownership Plan (ZOP). The ZOP is based on a variable incentive plan for the senior management of the company that has been in place since 2019 and that has also been introduced to the remuneration system 2021 for the members of the Management Board to promote the alignment of the remuneration of the members of the Management Board with the company's overall remuneration philosophy.
According to their respective appointment, the CPO, Dr. Astrid Arndt and the CFO, Dr. Sandra Dembeck, both participate in the LTI 2021/2022 as well as the ZOP 2021, while CBPO, Jim Freeman, and COO, David Schröder, participate in the LTI 2019 and Co-CEOs, Robert Gentz, David Schneider and Rubin Ritter (who resigned from the Management Board with effect as of June 1, 2021) participate in the LTI 2018.
In addition to the variable remuneration components based on the current contractual arrangements there are still options outstanding from previous stock option plans or virtual option plans which have been granted to some members of the Management Board prior to their current appointment.
Applicable variable remuneration components in the reporting period Long-Term Incentive 2021/2022 (LTI 2021/2022), applicable to Dr. Astrid Arndt and Dr. Sandra Dembeck
The LTI 2021/2022 is a share-based virtual option program which is linked to the development of the company's Gross Merchandise Volume (GMV) as a key performance indicator and takes into account ESG targets by means of a modifier. As such, the Long-Term Incentive structure creates a strong alignment with shareholders' interests, includes a clear pay-for-performance link and encourages and rewards a long-term and future-oriented management of the company. The inclusion of ESG targets incentivizes the sustainable development of Zalando.
Under the LTI 2021/2022, the members of the Management Board are granted two types of options, namely virtual LTI Shares and virtual LTI Options, by way of a one-off grant for the entire term of their service agreement (sequential plan). The LTI provides the members of the Management Board with the flexibility to individually determine the proportion of LTI Shares (LTI Shares Ratio) and LTI Options (LTI Options Ratio). The choice of a mixture of LTI Shares and LTI Options takes into account the different personal circumstances and risk-affinity of members of the Management Board and provides the Supervisory Board with the flexibility to accommodate all talent profiles. For this purpose, the Supervisory Board sets a target value in Euro as grant value. The number of LTI Shares to be granted is calculated by dividing this grant value by the product of the share price as per the grant date and a fixed conversion factor for LTI Shares of 1, and multiplying this quotient with the LTI Shares Ratio. The number of LTI Options to be granted to the individual Management Board member is calculated by dividing the grant value by the product of the share price as per the grant date and a fixed conversion factor for LTI Options of 0.4, and multiplying this quotient with the LTI Options Ratio.
The number of LTI Shares and LTI Options which can be exercised is subject, inter alia, to their prior vesting, the expiry of the relevant waiting period and depends on the extent to which the performance criteria are met during the respective performance period.
Vesting scheme
The options vest in quarterly tranches over a performance period equal to the relevant term of the service agreement.
As a rule, in all cases of premature termination of the office as a member of the Management Board, options which have not yet vested on the date of such termination will cease to vest and be forfeited without compensation. In certain situations of termination qualifying as 'bad leaver' events, even vested and unexercised options of the member of the Management Board concerned will be forfeited without compensation. However, by way of an exception from the above, if the member of the Management Board is revoked from office as member of the Management Board by the company without good cause for termination within the meaning of Section 626 BGB (German Civil Code) and without qualifying as a 'bad leaver', such member of the Management Board retains, in addition to the options which have vested until such termination, also those options which would have vested during a period of two years thereafter.
Waiting period and exercise period
LTI Shares and LTI Options can only be exercised after the expiry of a four-year waiting period commencing on the grant date. Furthermore, LTI Shares and LTI Options can only be exercised within a fixed exercise period of three years after the expiry of the waiting period. LTI Shares and LTI Options which are still unexercised upon the expiry of the exercise period are forfeited without compensation.
The overall target achievement under the LTI 2021/2022 is measured in two steps, (i) on the basis of the development of the GMV of the Zalando group during the performance period commencing on the grant date until the end of the term of the service agreement as the most relevant performance parameter under our long-term strategy and (ii) by taking into account the achievement of certain ESG targets by means of a modifier of between -20 percentage points and 0 percentage points.
In the first step, the percentage of vested options which can be exercised depends on the extent to which the targeted GMV compound annual growth rate ("CAGR") in alignment with the company's strategy has been achieved during the performance period. If the targeted GMV CAGR during the performance period has been met, the target achievement is 100%. Subsequent increases or decreases of the GMV CAGR compared to the targeted GMV CAGR result in a corresponding increase or decrease of the target achievement.
The target achievement for the LTI Shares and LTI Options granted to Dr. Sandra Dembeck as of March 1, 2022, is determined as follows:
| GMV CAGR | Target achievement* |
|---|---|
| < 11.5% | $0\%$ |
| $\geq$ 11.5% and < 13.5% | 50% |
| $\geq$ 13.5% and < 15.5% | 60% |
| $\geq$ 15.5% and < 17.5% | 70% |
| $\geq$ 17.5% and < 19.5% | 80% |
| $\geq$ 19.5% and < 21.5% | 90% |
| $\geq$ 21.5% and < 23.5% | 100% |
| $\geq$ 23.5% and < 25.5% | 110% |
| $\geq 25.5\%$ | 125% |
For information on the target achievement for the LTI Shares and LTI Options granted to Dr. Astrid Arndt as of April 1, 2021, please refer to the ..........
The maximum target achievement is 125%. In the event that the GMV target achievement falls below 50%, the number of exercisable LTI Shares and LTI Options is 0.
In the second step, the target achievement is adjusted under application of an ESG modifier which can result in the deduction of a percentage of between -20 percentage points and 0 percentage points from the target achievement, depending on the degree of target achievement of the agreed ESG targets during the performance period. The ESG targets for the LTI Shares and LTI Options granted to Dr. Sandra Dembeck as of March 1, 2022, comprise a sustainability target aligned with our do.MORE strategy and a diversity and inclusion target aligned with our do.BETTER strategy, both clearly defined and measurable. The sustainability target which is weighted with 60% consists of four environmental sub-targets concerning the reduction of Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 80% by the end of the performance period against a 2017 base year, the increase of the annual sourcing of renewable electricity to 100% by the end of the performance period, the reduction of Scope 3 GHG
emissions from private label products by 40% per million Euros gross profit by the end of the performance period from a 2018 base year as well as ensuring that 90% of suppliers of the company (by emissions covering purchased goods and services sold on its platform, packaging and last-mile-delivery) will have science-based targets by the end of the performance period.
The sustainability target achievement for the LTI Shares and LTI Options granted to Dr. Sandra Dembeck as of March 1, 2022, is determined as follows. Each sustainability sub-target is weighted with 25% within the sustainability target achievement:
| Sub-targets | Sub-target achievement |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (i) Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions |
(ii) Renewable electricity |
(iii) Scope 3 GHG emissions |
(iv) Science-based targets at suppliers |
|
| 80% and above | $100\%$ | 40% and above | 90% and above | $0\%$ |
| 75% and above | 33% and above | 74% and above | $-5%$ | |
| 69% and above | 26% and above | 58% and above | $-10%$ | |
| 64% and above | 19% and above | 42% and above | $-15%$ | |
| below $64\%$ | below 100% | below 19% | below 42% | $-20%$ |
The diversity and inclusion target which is weighted 40% focuses on the increase of the share of women in leadership positions and is also divided into four different sub-targets representing different leadership levels as follows:
- $(i)$ 40%-60% share of women in a Senior Contributor (SC)1 role until the end of the performance period;
- $(ii)$ 40%-60% share of women in a Senior Contributor (SC)2 role until the end of the performance period;
- 40%-60% share of women in an Executive Contributor (EC)1 role until the end of $(iii)$ the performance period;
- 40%-60% share of women in an Executive Contributor (EC)2 role until the end of $(iv)$ the performance period.
The diversity and inclusion target achievement for the LTI Shares and LTI Options granted to Dr. Sandra Dembeck as of March 1, 2022, is determined as follows. Each diversity and inclusion sub-target is weighted with 25% within the diversity and inclusion target achievement:
| Sub-targets | Sub-target achievement |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (i) SC 1 |
(ii) SC 2 |
(iii) EC 1 |
(iv) EC 2 |
|
| 40%-60% | $40\% - 60\%$ | 40% 60% | 40%-60% | $0\%$ |
| 38% and above | 38% and above | 38% and above | 38% and above | $-5%$ |
| 36% and above | 36% and above | 36% and above | 36% and above | $-10%$ |
| 34% and above | 34% and above | 34% and above | 34% and above | $-15%$ |
| less than 34% | less than 34% | less than $34\%$ | less than 34% | $-20%$ |
The performance measurement and evaluation based on the parameters set out above for the virtual LTI Shares and virtual LTI Options granted to Dr. Sandra Dembeck in the fiscal year 2022 can only be completed following the end of the performance period upon the end of her current contractual term, i.e. in 2025.
Settlement value, cap
The LTI Shares entitle the member of the Management Board to a cash payment in the amount of the difference between our share price as per the exercise date and an exercise price of EUR 1.00 per LTI Share. The LTI Options entitle the member of the Management Board to a cash payment in the amount of the difference between our share price as per the exercise date and the share price as per the grant date. The payout (the settlement value) under the LTI 2021/2022 is capped at 200% of the share price as per the grant date for LTI Shares and at 250% of the share price as per the grant date for LTI Options. The company is entitled to settle its obligation by way of delivery of the respective number of treasury shares as settlement shares equivalent to the settlement value.
Development of options outstanding
The number of options outstanding of LTI 2021/2022 developed as follows in the reporting period:
LTI 2021
| Dr. Astrid Arndt | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of LTI Shares |
Exercise price (in EUR) |
Number of LTI Options |
Exercise price (in EUR) |
|
| Outstanding as of Jan 1, 2021 | О | 0 | ||
| Granted during the year | 29,240 | 1.00 | 73,099 | 85.50 |
| Vested during the year | 5,483 | 1.00 | 13,705 | 85.50 |
| Forfeited during the year | $\mathsf{O}\xspace$ | $\mathbb O$ | ||
| Exercised during the year | $\mathbf{0}$ | $\Omega$ | ||
| Outstanding as of Dec 31, 2021 | 29,240 | 1.00 | 73,099 | 85.50 |
| Exercisable as of Dec 31, 2021 | 0 | o | ||
| Outstanding as of Jan 1, 2022 | 29,240 | 1.00 | 73,099 | 85.50 |
| Granted during the year | $\mathbf 0$ | $\overline{0}$ | ||
| Vested during the year | 7,310 | 1.00 | 18,275 | 85.50 |
| Forfeited during the year | $\circ$ | 0 | ||
| Exercised during the year | $\mathbf{0}$ | 0 | ||
| Outstanding as of Dec 31, 2022 | 29,240 | 1.00 | 73,099 | 85.50 |
| Exercisable as of Dec 31, 2022 | $\mathbf 0$ | $\mathbf{o}$ | ||
| Weighted average remaining contractual life of options outstanding (in years) |
||||
| As of Dec 31, 2021 | 63 | 63 | ||
| As of Dec 31, 2022 | 53 | 53 | ||
| Weighted average share price (in EUR) for options exercised in |
||||
| 2021 | ||||
| 2022 |
LTI 2021/2022
| Dr. Sandra Dembeck | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of LTI Shares |
Exercise price (in EUR) |
Number of LTI Options |
Exercise price (in EUR) |
|||
| Outstanding as of Jan 1, 2021 | 0 | $\mathbf 0$ | ||||
| Granted during the year | $\mathbf 0$ | $\mathbf 0$ | ||||
| Vested during the year | $\mathbf 0$ | $\mathbf 0$ | ||||
| Forfeited during the year | $\mathsf{O}\xspace$ | $\mathbf 0$ | ||||
| Exercised during the year | $\mathbf 0$ | $\mathbf 0$ | ||||
| Outstanding as of Dec 31, 2021 | O | $\mathbf{o}$ | ||||
| Exercisable as of Dec 31, 2021 | O | 0 | ||||
| Outstanding as of Jan 1, 2022 | O | $\mathbf 0$ | ||||
| Granted during the year | 38,308 | 1.00 | 95,770 | 53.84 | ||
| Vested during the year | 9,578 | 1.00 | 23,942 | 53.84 | ||
| Forfeited during the year | $\mathbf 0$ | $\mathbf 0$ | ||||
| Exercised during the year | $\mathbf 0$ | $\mathbf{0}$ | ||||
| Outstanding as of Dec 31, 2022 | 38,308 | 1.00 | 95,770 | 53.84 | ||
| Exercisable as of Dec 31, 2022 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Weighted average remaining contractual life of options outstanding (in years) |
||||||
| As of Dec 31, 2021 | ||||||
| As of Dec 31, 2022 | 6.2 | 6.2 | ||||
| Weighted average share price (in EUR) for options exercised in |
||||||
| 2021 | ||||||
| 2022 |
Zalando Ownership Plan 2021 (ZOP 2021), applicable to Dr. Astrid Arndt and
Dr. Sandra Dembeck
Under the ZOP 2021, virtual ZOP Shares and/or virtual ZOP Options are granted in an annual target amount, divided into quarterly tranches.
The ZOP 2021 provides the members of the Management Board with the flexibility to individually determine the proportion of ZOP Shares and of ZOP Options (ZOP Shares Ratio or ZOP Options Ratio, respectively, each from 0% to 100% but in steps of 5%) during a fixed annual selection window. The number of ZOP Shares to be granted for the respective annual period is calculated by dividing the annual target amount by the product of the share price as per the grant date and a fixed conversion factor of 1.05 and multiplying this quotient with the
ZOP Shares Ratio. The number of ZOP Options to be granted for the respective annual period is calculated by dividing the annual target amount by the product of the share price as per the grant date and a fixed conversion factor of 0.3 and multiplying this quotient with the ZOP Options Ratio. For the ZOP 2021 tranches granted in the fiscal year 2022, 100% was granted in ZOP Shares to both Dr. Astrid Arndt and Dr. Sandra Dembeck.
Waiting period and exercise period
The ZOP Shares are not subject to a waiting period, whereas the ZOP Options are only exercisable after a waiting period of two years commencing on the grant date. Furthermore, ZOP Shares and ZOP Options are only exercisable during an exercise period of three years (i) following the grant date in the case of the ZOP Shares and (ii) following the expiry of the waiting period in case of the ZOP Options.
Performance criterion
The ZOP 2021 does not provide for specific performance targets to be achieved (other than the LTI 2021 and the LTI 2021/2022 as described above) but is a share-based remuneration component and as such linked to the share price development. The share-based structure of the ZOP contributes to the alignment of the interests of the members of the Management Board with those of our shareholders in promoting the long-term development and growth of the company.
Settlement value and cap
The ZOP Shares entitle the members of the Management Board to a cash payment in the amount of the difference between the share price at the time ZOP Shares are exercised and the exercise price of EUR 1.00 per exercised ZOP Share. The ZOP Options entitle the members of the Management Board to a cash payment in the amount of the difference between the share price as per the exercise date and the share price as per the grant date. The payment claim (the Settlement Value) under the ZOP is limited to 200% of the share price as per the grant date per ZOP Share and to 250% of the share price as per the grant date per ZOP Option. The company is entitled to settle its obligation by way of delivery of the respective number of treasury shares as settlement shares equivalent to the settlement value.
Development of options outstanding
The number of options outstanding of ZOP 2021 developed as follows in the reporting period:
ZOP 2021
| Dr. Astrid Arndt | ||
|---|---|---|
| Number of ZOP Shares |
Exercise price (in EUR) |
|
| Outstanding as of Jan 1, 2021 | О | |
| Granted during the year | 1,903 | 1.00 |
| Vested during the year | 1,903 | 1.00 |
| Forfeited during the year | 0 | |
| Exercised during the year | 0 | |
| Outstanding as of Dec 31, 2021 | 1,903 | 1.00 |
| Exercisable as of Dec 31, 2021 | 1,903 | 1.00 |
| Outstanding as of Jan 1, 2022 | 1,903 | 1.00 |
| Granted during the year | 10,204 | 1.00 |
| Vested during the period | 10,204 | 1.00 |
| Forfeited during the year | 0 | |
| Exercised during the year | 0 | |
| Outstanding as of Dec 31, 2022 | 12,107 | 1.00 |
| Exercisable as of Dec 31, 2022 | 12,107 | 1.00 |
| Weighted average remaining contractual life of options outstanding (in years) |
||
| As of Dec 31, 2021 | 26 | |
| As of Dec 31, 2022 | 24 | |
| Weighted average share price (in EUR) for options exercised in |
||
| 2021 | ||
| 2022 |
ZOP 2021
| Dr. Sandra Dembeck | ||
|---|---|---|
| Number of ZOP Shares |
Exercise price (in EUR) |
|
| Outstanding as of Jan 1, 2021 | О | |
| Granted during the year | $\overline{0}$ | |
| Vested during the year | $\mathbf 0$ | |
| Forfeited during the year | 0 | |
| Exercised during the year | 0 | |
| Outstanding as of Dec 31, 2021 | 0 | |
| Exercisable as of Dec 31, 2021 | О | |
| Outstanding as of Jan 1, 2022 | О | |
| Granted during the year | 7,317 | 1.00 |
| Vested during the period | 7,317 | 1.00 |
| Forfeited during the year | $\mathbf 0$ | |
| Exercised during the year | $\overline{0}$ | |
| Outstanding as of Dec 31, 2022 | 7,317 | 1.00 |
| Exercisable as of Dec 31, 2022 | 7,317 | 1.00 |
| Weighted average remaining contractual life of options outstanding (in years) |
||
| As of Dec 31, 2021 | ||
| As of Dec 31, 2022 | 26 | |
| Weighted average share price (in EUR) for options exercised in |
||
| 2021 | ||
| 2022 | ||
Long-Term Incentive 2019 (LTI 2019), applicable to Jim Freeman and David Schröder
The LTI 2019 is a share-based virtual option program that is linked to the development of our share price during the four-year term of office of Jim Freeman and David Schröder and the growth of our business during the performance period (as defined below). As such, we believe the Long-Term Incentive structure creates strong alignment with shareholders' interests, includes a clear pay-for-performance link and encourages and rewards the long-term and future-oriented management of the company.
Under the LTI 2019, the members of the Management Board are granted three types of options, namely Type A, Type B and/or Type C Options by way of a one-off grant for the entire term of their service agreement (sequential plan). Each option relates to one share in the
company. Type A options have an exercise price of EUR 29.84 and Type B and Type C options have an exercise price of EUR 1.00.
The number of LTI 2019 options which can be exercised is subject to, inter alia, their prior vesting, the expiry of the relevant waiting period and depends on the extent to which the targeted growth of our group's business under the performance criterion is met during the respective performance period. With respect to negative tax consequences resulting for the CBPO Jim Freeman as a citizen of the United States of America from the application of certain provisions of Sec. 409A of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, specific rules of the LTI 2019 have been amended (the "Restated LTI 2019") and 68,500 options vested by March 31, 2020 have been canceled and settled by the company as cash and share consideration. The company has indemnified Jim Freeman from the tax penalty under US law imposed on the settlement value and the remaining options under the restated LTI 2019, whereby the indemnity in relation to remaining options is capped and will not exceed the amount which would have been payable if the relevant per-share value of the respective remaining options for purposes of calculating the respective penalties had been EUR 55.00.
Vesting, waiting period and exercise period
The LTI 2019 options vest in quarterly tranches over a four-year period. Whereas the Type B and Type C Options vest linearly, Type A Options vest in increasing tranches. Vested performance-based options can only be exercised after the expiry of a waiting period of one to four years (depending on their time of vesting) commencing on April 1, 2019.
Under the Restated LTI 2019 (see above), the non-performance based Type C Options (for details see below) granted to Jim Freeman vest at the end of each quarter or, if the vesting date falls on December 31, November 1 of each calendar year. For these non-performance based options, the respective waiting period expires at the end of the applicable vesting date. Besides, under the Restated LTI 2019 the exercise period for all Type C Options is shortened and expires at the end of the calendar year within which the respective applicable waiting period expires. The exercise period for the remaining options ends as of March 31, 2023.
As a rule, in all cases of premature termination of the office as a member of the Management Board, options which have not yet vested on the date of such termination will cease to vest and be forfeited without compensation. In certain situations of termination qualifying as 'bad leaver' events, even vested and unexercised options of the member of the Management Board will be forfeited without compensation. However, by way of an exception from the above, if the member of the Management Board is revoked from office as member of the Management Board by the company without good cause for termination within the meaning of Section 626 BGB and without qualifying as a 'bad leaver', such member of the Management Board retains, in addition to the options which have vested until such termination, also those options which would have vested during a period of two years thereafter.
The performance period commences on the grant date (April 1, 2019) and corresponds to the applicable waiting period for the respective options resulting in a one-year performance period for options with a one-year waiting period, a two-year performance period for options with a two-year waiting period, etc.
The performance criterion measures the CAGR of Zalando group's business during the relevant performance period. The measure for growth of the company's business is the company's consolidated revenue. However, should the share from the company's Partner Program increase to at least a 14% share in consolidated revenue, adjusted for the grossedup Partner Program merchandise volume (i.e. not including Partner Program commission only as in revenue, but treating the Partner Program as wholesale, thus grossed up to show 100% of the Partner Program merchandise volume), then this adjusted consolidated revenue is to be used as the relevant parameter for the growth of the company's business for the full relevant performance period as this number then more adequately reflects the growth of the company's overall business.
The percentage of vested options which can be exercised depends on the extent to which a targeted CAGR of at least 15% has been achieved during the performance period. This requires an outperformance of the expected continued strong growth of the European online fashion retail market during the term of appointment as member of the Management Board by a factor of roughly 2. At the time of establishing the LTI 2019 for Jim Freeman and David Schröder, the European online fashion retail industry was projected to grow at a CAGR of 7%1 by 2023.
100% of the vested options can be exercised if the CAGR equals or exceeds 15%. Otherwise, depending on the extent of the shortfall of the actual CAGR from such target CAGR, the percentage of the relevant vested options which can be exercised decreases.
For Type A and Type B Options the following step function applies; at a CAGR below 10%, the payout is zero:
| Exercisable options (as % of the total number of vested options) | ||
|---|---|---|
| 100% | ||
| 90% | ||
| 80% | ||
| 20% | ||
| 10% | ||
| $0\%$ | ||
CAGR (2018–2023); Source: Euromonitor, fixed exchange rates. Data for Europe (excluding Russia) includes apparel and footwear, bags/
luggage, jewelry and watches. All figures incl. sales tax.
42
For Type C Options the following step function applies. At a CAGR below 11%, the payout is 50%, i.e. 50% of the relevant vested options can be exercised irrespective of the achievement of a performance criterion after expiry of the waiting period:
| CAGR | Exercisable options (as % of the total number of vested options) |
|---|---|
| $CAGR \ge 15.0\%$ | 100% |
| $<$ 15.0% and $\geq$ 14.5% | 90% |
| $<$ 14.0% and $\geq$ 13.0% | 80% |
| $<$ 13.0% and $\geq$ 12.0% | 70% |
| $<$ 12.0% and $\geq$ 11.0% | 60% |
| $< 11.0\%$ | 50% |
Non-performing options (i.e. options that could not be exercised due to a shortfall in CAGR) with a four-year waiting period are forfeited without compensation. Non-performing options with a waiting period of less than four years may become exercisable at a later stage, provided that the relevant CAGR increases.
Settlement value and cap
The member of the Management Board is entitled to the amount by which the share price as per the exercise date exceeds the exercise price of EUR 29.84 for Type A Options and EUR 1.00 for Type B and Type C Options. This amount (the Settlement Value) is limited to a maximum of EUR 70.16 per Type A and EUR 99.00 per Type B and Type C Option. In order to achieve this maximum amount, the company's share price upon exercise needs to reach EUR 100.00. The company is entitled to settle its obligation by way of delivery of the respective number of treasury shares as settlement shares equivalent to the settlement value.
Development of options outstanding
The number of options outstanding under the LTI 2019 and restated LTI 2019 developed as follows in the reporting period:
LTI 2019
| David Schröder | David Schröder | Jim Freeman | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Type A options |
Exercise price (in EUR) |
Number of Type B options |
Exercise price (in EUR) |
Number of Type C options |
Exercise price (in EUR) |
||
| Outstanding as of Jan 1, 2021 |
395,302 | 29.84 | 108,640 | 1.00 | 178,591 | 1.00 | |
| Granted during the year | $\overline{0}$ | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Vested during the year | 117,500 | 29.84 | 27,500 | 1.00 | 68,500 | 1.00 | |
| Forfeited during the year | $\mathbf 0$ | 0 | $\overline{\phantom{0}}$ | $\circ$ | $\overline{\phantom{0}}$ | ||
| Exercised during the year* | 155,000 | 29.84 | 52,500 | 1.00 | 67,277 | 1.00 | |
| Outstanding as of Dec 31, 2021 |
240,302 | 29.84 | 56,140 | 1.00 | 111,314 | 1.00 | |
| Exercisable as of Dec 31, 2021 |
302 | 29.84 | 1,140 | 1.00 | 0 | ||
| Outstanding as of Jan 1, 2022 |
240,302 | 29.84 | 56,140 | 1.00 | 111,314 | 1.00 | |
| Granted during the year | $\mathbf 0$ | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Vested during the year | 120,000 | 29.84 | 27,500 | 1.00 | 68,500 | 1.00 | |
| Forfeited during the year | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Exercised during the year** | $\mathbf 0$ | 0 | 68,500 | 1.00 | |||
| Outstanding as of Dec 31, 2022 |
240,302 | 29.84 | 56,140 | 1.00 | 42,814 | 1.00 | |
| Exercisable as of Dec 31, 2022 |
120,302 | 29.84 | 28,650 | 1.00 | 0 | ||
| Weighted average remaining contractual life of options outstanding (in years) |
|||||||
| As of Dec 31, 2021 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 1.4 | ||||
| As of Dec 31, 2022 | 3.3 | 33 | 1.0 | ||||
| Weighted average share price (in EUR) for options exercised in |
|||||||
| 2021 | 89.61 | 90.73 | 85.67 | ||||
| 2022 | 34.76 | ||||||
| Share price cap*** | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | ||||
| Measured CAGR for exercised options in 2022 based on adjusted consolidated revenue |
267% | ||||||
| Target achievement | 100.0% | ||||||
*) Of 155,000 options exercised in 2021 100,000 options were exercised on May 21, 2021 and 55,000 options were exercised on August 25, 2021
at EUR 29.84. Of 52,500 options exercised in 2021 27,500 options were exercised o
Long-Term Incentive 2018 (LTI 2018), applicable to Robert Gentz, David Schneider and Rubin Ritter
The LTI 2018 is a share-based option program which grants both real (equity) stock options as well as virtual stock options. The program is linked to the development of the share price of the company and the growth of the company's business during the five-year service agreement term of the Co-CEOs. As such, the Long-Term Incentive structure includes a strong retention element as well as a clear pay-for-performance link. In addition, we believe it creates strong alignment with shareholders' interests and promotes the long-term development of the company. Each option relates to one share in the company and has an exercise price of EUR 47.44. The exercise price was determined on the basis of the current share price as per the date of the execution of the service agreements in August 2018 and then increased by 5%.
Vesting scheme
The LTI 2018 options vest in quarterly tranches over a five-year period.
As a rule, in all cases of premature termination of the office as a member of the Management Board, options which have not yet vested on the date of such termination will cease to vest and be forfeited without compensation. In certain situations of termination qualifying as 'bad leaver' events, even vested and unexercised options of the member of the Management Board concerned will be forfeited without compensation. However, by way of an exception from the above, if a member of the Management Board is revoked from office as member of the Management Board by the company without good cause for termination within the meaning of Section 626 BGB and without qualifying as a 'bad leaver', such member of the Management Board retains, in addition to the options which have vested until such termination, also those options which would have vested during a period of two years thereafter.
Performance criterion
The performance criterion for the LTI 2018 options measures the CAGR of Zalando group's business during the relevant performance period as depicted by the relevant growth parameter described below as the most relevant performance parameter under the company's long-term strategy in 2018. The percentage of vested options of the beneficiaries which can be exercised depends on the extent to which a targeted CAGR of at least 15% has been achieved during the performance period. This requires the company to outperform the expected continued strong growth of the European online fashion retail market between 2018 until 2023 by a factor of roughly 2. At the time when the remuneration system for the Co-CEOs was established, the European online fashion retail industry was projected to grow at a CAGR of $7\%$ 2 over a five-year period.
The company's consolidated revenue is used as the relevant parameter for the growth of the company's business. However, should the share from the company's Partner Program increase to a 14% share in adjusted consolidated revenue, then the adjusted consolidated revenue is to be used as the relevant parameter for the growth of the company's business for the full relevant performance period. The adjusted consolidated revenue includes full Partner Program
CAGR (2018–2023); Source: Euromonitor, fixed exchange rates. Data for Europe (excluding Russia) includes apparel and footwear,
bags/luggage, jewelry and watches. All figures incl. sales tax.
merchandise volume, i.e. not including Partner Program commission only as in revenue, but treating the Partner Program as wholesale, thus grossed up to show 100% of the Partner Program merchandise volume. This number more adequately reflects the growth of the company's overall business and ensures the Management Board is agnostic in its steering between the company's wholesale and its marketplace business.
100% of the vested options can be exercised if the CAGR equals or exceeds 15%. Otherwise, depending on the extent of the shortfall of the actual CAGR from such target CAGR, the percentage of the relevant vested options which can be exercised decreases in steps, with each 0.5ppt of CAGR below 15% resulting in a 10% payout reduction, the last step being < 11.0% and ≥ 10.0%; below 10% CAGR the payout is zero:
Performance criterion
| CAGR | Exercisable options (as % of the total number of vested options) |
|---|---|
| $CAGR \geq 15.0\%$ | 100% |
| $<$ 15.0% and $\geq$ 14.5% | 90% |
| $<$ 14.5% and $\geq$ 14.0% | 80% |
| etc. | |
| $<$ 11.5% and $\geq$ 11.0% | 20% |
| $< 11.0\%$ and $\geq 10.0\%$ | 10% |
| $< 10.0\%$ | $0\%$ |
Waiting period and performance period
The options can only be exercised after the expiry of a waiting period of four years commencing on the effective date December 1, 2018 for 57% of the options and 4.75 years for the remaining 43% of the options. The performance period relevant for the achievement of the performance criterion equals the waiting period (i.e. 4 and 4.75 years) for the respective options. LTI 2018 options have become exercisable and their performance criterion has been measured for the first time in this reporting period.
Settlement value and cap
Upon the exercise of virtual stock options, the beneficiaries are entitled to the amount by which the share price as per the exercise date exceeds the exercise price of EUR 47.44. This amount (the settlement value) is limited to a maximum of EUR 97.14 per option. In order to achieve this maximum amount the company's share price will need to reach EUR 144.58. The company is entitled to settle its obligation by way of delivery of the respective number of treasury shares as settlement shares equivalent to the settlement value.
Upon the exercise of equity stock options, the beneficiaries are entitled to the respective number of new shares of the company equivalent to the amount by which the share price as per the exercise date exceeds the exercise price of EUR 47.44. This amount (the settlement value) is limited to a maximum of EUR 97.14 per option. In order to achieve this maximum amount the company's share price will need to reach EUR 144.58. The company is entitled to
47
settle its obligation in cash or by way of delivery of the respective number of treasury shares as settlement shares equivalent to the settlement value.
Development of options outstanding
The number of options outstanding of LTI 2018 developed as follows in the reporting period:
LTI 2018
| Robert Gentz David Schneider |
Rubin Ritter*** | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of options |
Exercise price (in EUR) |
Number of options |
Exercise price (in EUR) |
Number of options |
Exercise price (in EUR) |
|
| Outstanding as of Jan 1, 2021 |
1,723,983 | 47.44 | 1,723,983 | 47.44 | 1,723,983 | 47.44 |
| Granted during the year | $\overline{0}$ | $\mathbf 0$ | $\circ$ | |||
| Vested during the year | 350,000 | 47.44 | 350,000 | 47.44 | 175,000 | 47.44 |
| Forfeited during the year* | $\mathbf{0}$ | 0 | 875,000 | 47.44 | ||
| Exercised during the year | $\mathbf 0$ | $\mathbf 0$ | $\overline{\phantom{0}}$ | $\mathbb O$ | ||
| Outstanding as of Dec 31, 2021 |
1,723,983 | 47.44 | 1,723,983 | 47.44 | 848,983 | 47.44 |
| Exercisable as of Dec 31, 2021 |
0 | o | o | |||
| Outstanding as of Jan 1, 2022 |
1,723,983 | 47.44 | 1,723,983 | 47.44 | 848,983 | 47.44 |
| Granted during the year | $\overline{0}$ | $\mathbf{0}$ | 0 | |||
| Vested during the year | 350,000 | 47 44 | 350,000 | 4744 | $\mathbf 0$ | |
| Forfeited during the year | $\overline{0}$ | $\mathbf 0$ | $\mathbb O$ | |||
| Exercised during the year | $\overline{O}$ | $\overline{0}$ | $\mathbf 0$ | |||
| Outstanding as of Dec 31, 2022 |
1,723,983 | 47.44 | 1,723,983 | 47.44 | 848,983 | 47.44 |
| Exercisable as of Dec 31, 2022 |
973,983 | 47.44 | 973,983 | 47.44 | 848,983 | 47.44 |
| Weighted average remaining contractual life of options outstanding (in years) |
||||||
| As of Dec 31, 2021 | 49 | 49 | 49 | |||
| As of Dec 31, 2022 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 3.9 | |||
| Weighted average share price (in EUR) for options exercised in |
||||||
| 2021 | ||||||
| 2022 |
$^{\star})$
With the termination of the service agreement of Rubin Ritter with effect as of June 1, 2021, options granted to him under the LTI 2018 ceased to
vest after June 1, 2021, with 875,000 options not vested until then forfeite $\overline{r}$
$***$
Virtual Stock Option Program 2018 (VSOP 2018), applicable to Jim Freeman
The CBPO Jim Freeman served the company as SVP Engineering prior to his appointment as member of the Management Board on April 1, 2019 and participated in the VSOP 2018 at that time. Under the VSOP 2018 375,000 options with an exercise price of EUR 29.84 continued to vest in quarterly tranches after the appointment as member of the Management Board and were therefore considered part of the Management Board remuneration. The exercise of the virtual options requires the achievement of the performance criterion which is determined in a CAGR of the Zalando group net merchandise value of at least 6% during a lock-up period of two to five years. The exercise of the virtual options requires the expiry of a lock-up period of two to five years.
The beneficiaries are entitled to the amount by which the share price as per the exercise date exceeds the exercise price of EUR 29.84. This amount (the settlement value) is limited to a maximum of EUR 70.16 per option. In order to achieve this maximum amount the company's share price will need to reach EUR 100.00. The company is entitled to settle its obligation by way of delivery of the respective number of treasury shares as settlement shares equivalent to the settlement value.
With respect to negative tax consequences resulting for Jim Freeman as a citizen of the United States of America from the application of certain provisions of Sec. 409A of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, specific rules of the VSOP 2018 have been amended (the "Restated VSOP 2018") and 250,000 options vested until April 1, 2020 were canceled and settled by the company as cash and share consideration in 2020. The company will indemnify Jim Freeman from the penalty imposed under Sec. 409c of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code on the settlement value and the remaining options under the Restated VSOP 2018, whereby the indemnity in relation to remaining options is capped and will not exceed the amount which would have been payable if the relevant per-share value of the respective remaining options for purposes of calculating the respective penalties had been EUR 55.00.
Under the Restated VSOP 2018, the remaining options' expiry date is the last day of the calendar year in which the respective lock-up period for such options expires.
Development of options outstanding
The number of options outstanding under VSOP 2018 of Jim Freeman developed as follows in the reporting period:
| Jim Freeman | ||
|---|---|---|
| Number of options |
Exercise price (in EUR) |
|
| Outstanding as of Jan 1, 2021 | 245,938 | 29.84 |
| Granted during the year | 0 | |
| Vested during the year | 95,000 | 29.84 |
| Forfeited during the year | 0 | |
| Exercised during the year* | 105,938 | 29.84 |
| Outstanding as of Dec 31, 2021 | 140,000 | 29.84 |
| Exercisable as of Dec 31, 2021 | 0 | |
| Outstanding as of Jan 1, 2022 | 140,000 | 29.84 |
| Granted during the year | 0 | |
| Vested during the year | 70,000 | 29.84 |
| Forfeited during the year | 0 | |
| Exercised during the year** | 80,000 | 29.84 |
| Outstanding as of Dec 31, 2022 | 60,000 | 29.84 |
| Exercisable as of Dec 31, 2022 | 0 | |
| Weighted average remaining contractual life of options outstanding (in years) |
||
| As of Dec 31, 2021 | 1.4 | |
| As of Dec 31, 2022 | 1.0 | |
| Share price cap*** | 100.00 | |
| Weighted average share price (in EUR) for options exercised in |
||
| 2021 | 87.05 | |
| 2022 | 3287 | |
| Measured CAGR for exercised options in 2022 on net merchandise volume |
23.2% | |
| Target achievement | 100.0% | |
*) 105,938 options were exercised on May 21, 2021 at EUR 29.84.
**) 80,000 options were exercised on November 15, 2022 at EUR 29.84.
***) All options were exercised at a share price below the share price cap.
Before the introduction of the LTI 2018, the Co-CEOs participated among others in the Long-Term Incentive plan SOP 2013, which granted real stock options rather than virtual entitlements. All options granted under the SOP 2013 became exercisable prior to the reporting period but were still partially outstanding during the reporting period.
The SOP 2013 options were granted to the Co-CEOs in the fiscal year 2013. Each SOP 2013 option entitles the beneficiaries to acquire one share. The exercise price is EUR 15.63 per option. The beneficiaries can alternatively request a reduction of the exercise price from EUR 15.63 to EUR 1.00 for all or some of the options already vested. In this case, the number of options is reduced so that it leaves the beneficiaries at the time of the request neither better nor worse off economically. The options granted to the beneficiaries vested in monthly tranches over a five-year period. The last tranche of SOP 2013 vested in November 2018. The exercise of the options required the expiry of a four-year waiting period and the achievement of the performance criterion which was determined in a transactional net sales CAGR of at least 5% during the four-year waiting period. The waiting period ended in December 2017 and the performance criterion was fully achieved at the end of this period.
Development of options outstanding
The number of options outstanding of SOP 2013 developed as follows in the reporting period:
$50$
SOP 2013
| Robert Gentz,** | David Schneider,** | Rubin Ritter*** | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of options |
Weighted average exercise price (in EUR) |
Number of options |
Weighted average exercise price (in EUR) |
Number of options |
Weighted average exercise price (in EUR) |
|
| Outstanding as of Jan 1, 2021* |
532,265 | 1.00 | 532,265 | 1.00 | 1,332,675 | 1.00 |
| Granted during the year | ||||||
| Vested during the year | ||||||
| Forfeited during the year | ||||||
| Exercised during the year | 532,265 | 1.00 | 532,265 | 1.00 | 925,200 | 1.00 |
| Outstanding as of Dec 31, 2021 |
0 | 0 | 407,475 | 1.00 | ||
| Exercisable as of Dec 31, 2021 |
0 | 0 | 407,475 | 1.00 | ||
| Outstanding as of Jan 1, 2022 |
o | 0 | 407,475 | 1.00 | ||
| Granted during the year | 0 | $\mathbb O$ | ||||
| Vested during the year | 0 | $\circ$ | ||||
| Forfeited during the year | 0 | $\circ$ | ||||
| Exercised during the year | 0 | $\circ$ | 407,475 | 1.00 | ||
| Outstanding as of Dec 31, 2022 |
O | $\pmb{\mathsf{o}}$ | 0 | |||
| Exercisable as of Dec 31, 2022 |
0 | o | 0 | |||
| Weighted average remaining contractual life of options outstanding (in years) |
||||||
| As of Dec 31, 2021 | 1.0 | |||||
| As of Dec 31, 2022 | ||||||
| Weighted average share price (in EUR) for options exercised in |
||||||
| 2021 | 86.26 | 86.26 | 90.71 | |||
| 2022 | 35.90 | |||||
| Measured CAGR for exercised options in 2022 on transactional net sales (TNS) |
26.9% | |||||
| Target achievement | 100.0% | |||||
*) For 3,253,800 options, Rubin Ritter used the contractually agreed provision to reduce the exercise price to EUR 1.00 in 2018 and 2020. This reduced the number of these options to 2,503,246, of which 200,000 were exerci
Further information pursuant to Section 162 AktG
Compliance with the maximum remuneration (Section 162 (1) Sentence 2 No. 7 AktG) During the reporting period the remuneration system 2021 was only applicable to the remuneration of Dr. Astrid Arndt and Dr. Sandra Dembeck. The new service agreement with David Schröder for his tenure commencing as of April 1, 2023 includes a cap of the remuneration in line with the remuneration system 2021 that was, however, not yet valid in the reporting period. Accordingly, the total maximum compensation amount stipulated under the remuneration system 2021 as of the end of the reporting period only applied to Dr. Astrid Arndt and Dr. Sandra Dembeck.
For Dr. Astrid Arndt, the total maximum compensation for a fiscal year is capped at EUR 5.25m. Since the pro rata inflow from the LTI options and LTI shares granted to Dr. Astrid Arndt under the LTI 2021 for the fiscal year 2022 can only be determined after the expiry of the waiting period of four years, compliance with the maximum remuneration for the fiscal year 2022 can only be conclusively reported in the context of the remuneration report for the fiscal year 2025.
With respect to Dr. Sandra Dembeck, her total maximum compensation for a fiscal year is capped at EUR 6.84m. As in the case of Dr. Astrid Arndt the pro rata inflow from the LTI options and LTI shares granted to Dr. Sandra Dembeck under the LTI 2021/2022 for the fiscal year 2022 can only be determined after the expiry of the waiting period of four years. Compliance with the maximum remuneration for the fiscal year 2022 can thus only be conclusively reported in the context of the remuneration report for the fiscal year 2026.
Application of malus and clawback during reporting year
(Section 162 (1) Sentence 2 No. 4 AktG)
The remuneration system 2021 and in its implementation the service agreements of Dr. Astrid Arndt, Dr. Sandra Dembeck and the new service agreement with David Schröder with a four years' term commencing as of April 1, 2023 provide for malus and clawback clauses. In the case of a willful or grossly negligent serious breach of the obligations pursuant to Section 93 AktG or internal compliance policies and behavioral quidelines or severe compliance infringements by the member of the Management Board, the Supervisory Board may, at its sole discretion, retain in whole or in part variable remuneration (under ZOP 2021, LTI 2021 and/or LTI 2021/2022) that has not been paid out (malus). In such a case, the Supervisory Board may, at its sole discretion, reclaim in whole or in part variable remuneration that has already been paid out (clawback). Furthermore, the Supervisory Board has the possibility to reclaim variable remuneration in the case of an undue payout based on incorrect information.
In the fiscal year 2022, the Supervisory Board did not make use of the option to retain (malus) or reclaim (clawback) variable remuneration components as none of the above conditions were ascertained by the Supervisory Board.
The service agreements of the members of the Management Board which were concluded before the implementation of the remuneration system 2021 do not include malus or clawback provisions. This does not affect the applicable legal situation regarding any claims for
damages on the part of the company against the Management Board members in the event of culpable breaches of duty (such as according to Section 93 (2) AktG).
Benefits promised or granted to a member of the Management Board by a third party with regard to their activity as a member of the Board of Management (Section 162 (2) No.1 AktG) During the fiscal year 2022, no benefits were granted to the members of the Management Board by third parties. Also, there are no outstanding benefits that were promised by third parties to the members of the Management Board.
Benefits promised to the members of the Management Board in the event of regular or early termination (Section 162 (2) No. 2 and 3 AktG)
Severance entitlements upon premature termination
The service agreements of all current Management Board members provide that in the event of a removal from office for good cause pursuant to Section 84 (4) AktG, the company may terminate the service agreement prematurely within the statutory termination period pursuant to Section 622 BGB. In such an event and if there is no good cause for the termination within the meaning of Section 626 BGB, the member of the Management Board is entitled to a cash severance payment which amounts to two times the annual fixed salary, however, not more than the fixed salary that would have been payable for the remaining term of the service agreement.
Entitlement upon death and permanent incapacity
In the event of death, the service agreements of all current members of the Management Board provide for continued payment of the fixed remuneration for the month of death and the following three months to the spouse, registered partner or partner and/or any children under the age of 25 living with the member of the Management Board and being entitled to child support.
In the event of permanent incapacity to work, the service agreement will end without notice of termination being required at the end of the calendar quarter in which such permanent incapacity to work is determined. If a Management Board member is temporarily unable to work as a result of illness, accident or any other reason beyond the Director's control, the Director's Service Agreement provides for a continued payment of their fixed remuneration for up to six weeks, but not beyond the effective termination date of the service agreement.
Treatment of outstanding variable remuneration
In the event of a permanent incapacity of a Management Board member unvested Options under the LTI 2018, the LTI 2019, the LTI 2021 and the LTI 2021/2022 continue to vest (until termination of the office of the member of the Management Board) also during periods of inability to work.
Also unvested options under the LTI 2018, the LTI 2019, the LTI 2021 and the LTI 2021/2022 which would have vested during the following two years can be kept by the member of the Management Board and continue to vest in accordance with the terms and conditions of the applicable LTI scheme.
Otherwise, as a general rule, if a leaver event occurs (as defined in each of the programs) all unvested options of the members of the Management Board under the LTI 2018, the LTI 2019, the LTJ 2021 and the LTJ 2021/2022 are forfeited without compensation. However, in the case of a revocation of a member of the Management Board from office by the company for good cause pursuant to Section 84 (4) AktG without the Management Board member qualifying as bad leaver (as defined in each of the programs), the Management Board member retains all unexercised stock options under the LTI 2018, the LTI 2019, the LTI 2021, the LTI 2021/2022 and the ZOP 2021 and all unvested options under the LTI 2018, the LTI 2019, the LTI 2021 and the LTI 2021/2022 which would have vested during the following two years can be kept by the Management Board member and continue to vest in accordance with the terms and conditions of the applicable LTI scheme.
If the Management Board member qualifies as bad leaver (as defined in each of the programs), all unsettled options of the Management Board member under the LTI 2018, the LTI 2019, the LTI 2021 or the LTI 2021/2022 (irrespective of vested or not), and all yet unexercised options under the SOP 2013 and all yet unexercised virtual stock options under the ZOP 2021 are forfeited without compensation.
Under the VSOP 2018, in a leaver event (as further defined) the virtual stock options granted will irrevocably cease to vest, and all of the unvested virtual stock options will be forfeited without entitlement to compensation. In the case of a bad leaver event all vested and unexercised virtual stock options will be forfeited without entitlement to compensation. In the case of a leaver event that does not qualify as a bad leaver event (good leaver event) all of the vested and unexercised virtual stock options are retained.
Entitlements upon a change of control
If the office or service agreement of a member of the Management Board ends due to a change of control, there are no contractually agreed change-of-control severance entitlements. There are also no specific contractually agreed termination rights for the members of the Management Board in the event of a change of control.
However, the LTI 2018, the LTI 2019, the LTI 2021 and the LTI 2021/2022 provide for a cancellation right of the Management Board members in the event of a change of control (as defined in each of the program rules) pertaining to unexercised vested options, and the SOP 2013 in relation to a certain portion of the options (equal to the portion of shares or assets of the company acquired by the acquirer(s) of control), in return for which the Management Board member is then entitled to a cash compensation per unexercised vested option.
The cash compensation per unexercised vested option (under the LTI 2018, the LTI 2019, the LTI 2021 and the LTI 2021/2022) generally corresponds to the compensation per share under the takeover offer minus the exercise price or (in the case of the SOP 2013) the compensation per share under the takeover offer if such offer is made or the volume-weighted average share price of one share in the company during the last 30 trading days prior to the change-ofcontrol-event, in each case minus the exercise price.
Also, under the LTI 2018, the LTI 2019, the LTI 2021 and the LTI 2021/2022, the company itself can request a cancellation of unexercised vested options in exchange for a payment of the above cash compensation and replacement of unvested options by an economically equivalent new incentive program, and under the SOP 2013 the company can request a replacement of some or all of the unvested options by an economically equivalent new incentive program.
Under the VSOP 2018, in the event of a change of control (as defined in the program) the company may request that a portion of the then outstanding vested virtual stock options which is equal to the portion of the shares or assets (as the case may be) acquired of the company in the relevant change of control event shall be canceled in exchange for a payment by the company of an amount equal to the excess, if any, of (i) the product of the relevant share price and the number of virtual stock options canceled over (ii) the aggregate exercise price for all such canceled virtual stock options, subject to certain deductions. The remaining vested virtual stock options not subject to the cancellation request remain unaffected.
The existing variable remuneration programs do not provide for any accelerated vesting in the case of a change of control.
Post-contractual non-compete clause
A post-contractual non-competition clause and accordingly also a promise of a non-compete compensation payment have not been agreed in the service contracts of the Management Board members who were active as Management Board members in the reporting year.
Benefits promised or granted to a former member of the Management Board whose position ended in the course of the reporting year (Section 162 (2) No. 4 AktG)
As no member left the Management Board in the reporting period, no such benefits were promised or granted.
Deviations from the remuneration system during the reporting period (Section 162 (1) Sentence 2 No. 5 AktG)
In exceptional cases, the Supervisory Board may temporarily deviate from the components of the remuneration system for the Management Board of Zalando in accordance with Section 87a (1) Sentence 2 AktG if this is necessary in the interest of the long-term welfare of the company. During the fiscal year 2022, there was no deviation from the remuneration system 2021.
$1.3.6$ Remuneration of Supervisory Board members
The remuneration system for the members of the Supervisory Board is based on the legal requirements and takes into account the recommendations and suggestions of the German Corporate Governance Code. The partially adjusted remuneration system for the Supervisory Board was submitted to the annual general meeting 2021 for resolution in accordance with Section 113 (3) AktG and resolved with effect for the fiscal year beginning on January 1, 2021.
The remuneration of Supervisory Board members is governed by Article 15 of the Articles of Association. The remuneration of the members of the Supervisory Board is balanced overall and commensurate with the responsibilities and tasks of the members of the Supervisory Board and the situation of the company, taking into account the remuneration arrangements of other large listed companies. The members of the Supervisory Board receive a purely function-related fixed remuneration in accordance with Clause G.18 of the German Corporate Governance Code, No performance-related remuneration or financial or non-financial performance criteria are provided for. This best reflects the independent supervisory and advisory function of the Supervisory Board, which is not geared to short-term corporate success but to the long-term development of the company.
The fixed annual remuneration is EUR 180,000 for the chairperson of the Supervisory Board, EUR 135,000 for the deputy chairperson of the Supervisory Board and EUR 90,000 for every other member of the Supervisory Board. For their work on the audit committee, members of the Supervisory Board receive an additional fixed annual remuneration of EUR 10,000. The chairperson of the audit committee receives an additional fixed annual remuneration of EUR 50,000.
The respective amount of the fixed remuneration takes into account the specific function and responsibility of the members of the Supervisory Board. In particular, in accordance with Clause G.17 of the German Corporate Governance Code, the higher time commitment of the chairperson and the deputy chairperson of the Supervisory Board as well as of the chairperson and the members of the audit committee is also appropriately taken into account through a corresponding additional remuneration. Attendance fees are not paid.
Supervisory Board members who are members of the Supervisory Board or the audit committee or hold the office of the chairperson or deputy chairperson of the Supervisory Board or of the chairperson of the audit committee for part of a fiscal year only, receive a corresponding proportionate remuneration. The remuneration falls due at the end of the fiscal year for which the remuneration is paid.
In addition to the function-related fixed remuneration, the members of the Supervisory Board are reimbursed for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in the performance of the Supervisory Board mandate as well as any value added tax payable on their remuneration and expenses. Furthermore, the members of the Supervisory Board are included in a D&O liability insurance policy for board members maintained by the company in the company's interests that will provide reasonable coverage against financial damages. The premiums for this insurance policy are paid by the company.
The annual general meeting determines the remuneration of the members of the Supervisory Board upon proposal of the Management Board and the Supervisory Board in the Articles of Association or by resolution. The general meeting resolves on the remuneration of the members of the Supervisory Board at least every four years. A resolution confirming the existing remuneration is also permissible in this respect. Should the general meeting not confirm the remuneration system submitted to a vote, a revised remuneration system must be submitted to the following annual general meeting at the latest. In preparation for the resolution of the general meeting, the Management Board and the Supervisory Board each review whether the remuneration, in particular with regard to its amount and structure, continues to be in our interest and is in an appropriate relationship to the tasks of the members of the Supervisory Board and the situation of the company. The Supervisory Board may also carry out a horizontal market comparison for this purpose. In doing so, the Supervisory Board may seek advice from an external remuneration expert. If necessary, the Management Board and the Supervisory Board will propose an appropriate adjustment of the remuneration to the annual general meeting.
In accordance with Section 162 (1) Sentence 1 AktG, the following table shows the remuneration awarded and due ("gewährte und geschuldete Vergütung") to the members of the Supervisory Board in the fiscal years 2022 and 2021. According to the remuneration system for the members of the Supervisory Board, the remuneration only consists of a fixed component for each member of the Supervisory Board:
Remuneration of the members of the Supervisory Board
| IN EUR | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| Anders Holch Povisen (since December 9, 2013) | 90,000 | 90,000 |
| Anika Mangelmann (since June 23, 2020) | 90,000 | 90,000 |
| Cristina Stenbeck (since May 22, 2019) | 180,000 | 180,000 |
| Jade Buddenberg (since June 23, 2020) | 90,000 | 90,000 |
| Jennifer Hyman (since June 23, 2020) | 90,000 | 90,000 |
| Jørgen Madsen Lindemann (until May 19, 2021) | 38,082 | |
| Kelly Bennett (since May 22, 2019) | 145,000 | 145,000 |
| Mariella Röhm-Kottmann (since May 22, 2019) | 140.000 | 140,000 |
| Matti Ahtiainen (since June 23, 2020) | 100.000 | 100,000 |
| Niklas Östberg (since May 19, 2021) | 100,000 | 61,918 |
| Remuneration awarded and due according to Section 162 (1) Sentence 1 AktG |
1,025,000 | 1,025,000 |
The current and former members of the Supervisory Board did not receive any compensation from other group companies in the fiscal year 2022.
$1.3.7$ Comparative presentation of the development of the remuneration
In accordance with Section 162 (1) Sentence 2 No. 2 AktG, the following tables show the annual change in remuneration to the current and former members of the Management Board and of the Supervisory Board as well as the annual change in average employee remuneration on a full-time equivalent basis over the last five fiscal years and the company's performance. The remuneration of the Management Board members for the years 2018 and 2019 is based on the amount of "benefits received" as reported in the annual reports 2018 and 2019. The presentation of the average employee remuneration is based on the total workforce employed by Zalando. While the yearly target and fixed average remuneration on a full-time equivalent basis of employees increased year-on-year, the figures below show the remuneration including option exercises in the relevant year. In 2021, a higher amount of equity remuneration was exercised compared to 2022. Taking into account the holding periods over several years for the employee share programs, the figures shown are distorted. The development of the company's net income is shown alongside the development of the revenue of the Zalando group.
Comparative table on the change of remuneration awarded and due according to Section 162 (1) Sentence 1 AktG and company performance
| Annual change 2022 to 2021 |
Annual change 2021 to 2020 |
Annual change 2020 to 2019 |
Annual change 2019 to 2018 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Remuneration of the members of the Management Board | ||||
| Robert Gentz, Co-CEO | $0.4\%$ | 0.7% | 2.2% | $-99.5%$ |
| David Schneider, Co-CEO | 0.1% | $-6.1%$ | 8.1% | $-99.5%$ |
| Rubin Ritter, Co-CEO (until June 1, 2021) | $-54.8%$ | $-98.8%$ | $-66.5%$ | |
| Dr. Sandra Dembeck, CFO (since March 1, 2022) | ||||
| David Schröder, CFO | $-96.4%$ | 39.3% | 457.8% | |
| Dr. Astrid Arndt, CPO (since April 1, 2021) | 32.0% | |||
| Jim Freeman, CBPO | $-56.1%$ | 13.2% | 947.5% | |
| Company performance | ||||
| Net Income of ZALANDO SE | $-168.4%$ | $-20.1%$ | 373.5% | 7.8% |
| Revenue of the group | $-0.1%$ | 297% | 23.1% | 20.3% |
| Average remuneration on a full-time equivalent basis of employees |
||||
| ZALANDO SE | $-3.4%$ | $-3.2%$ | 16.1% | 0.8% |
| Annual change 2022 to 2021 |
Annual change 2021 to 2020 |
Annual change 2020 to 2019 |
Annual change 2019 to 2018 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Remuneration of the members of the Supervisory Board | ||||
| Anders Holch Povisen (since December 9, 2013) | $0.0\%$ | 17.0% | $-14.5%$ | 0.0% |
| Anika Mangelmann (since June 23, 2020) | $0.0\%$ | 164.6% | ||
| Cristina Stenbeck (since May 22, 2019) | $0.0\%$ | 20.0% | 63.2% | |
| Jade Buddenberg (since June 23, 2020) | 0.0% | 164.6% | ||
| Jennifer Hyman (since June 23, 2020) | 0.0% | 164 6% | ||
| Jørgen Madsen Lindemann (until May 19, 2021) | $-52.4%$ | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| Kelly Bennett (since May 22, 2019) | $0.0\%$ | 55.8% | 89.9% | |
| Mariella Röhm-Kottmann (since May 22, 2019) | 0.0% | 40.0% | 63.2% | |
| Matti Ahtiainen (since June 23, 2020) | 0.0% | 138.9% | ||
| Niklas Östberg (since May 19, 2021) | 61.5% | |||
| Company performance | ||||
| Net Income of ZALANDO SE | $-168.4%$ | $-20.1%$ | 374.5% | 7.8% |
| Revenue of the group | $-0.1%$ | 297% | 30.4% | 23.6% |
| Average remuneration on a full-time equivalent basis of employees |
||||
| ZALANDO SE | $-3.4%$ | $-3.2\%$ | 16.1% | 0.8% |
Berlin, March 6, 2023
| Robert Gentz | David Schneider | James M. Freeman, II |
|---|---|---|
| David Schröder | Dr. Astrid Arndt | Dr. Sandra Dembeck |
Cristina Stenbeck Mariella Röhm-Kottmann
To Zalando SE
We have audited the attached remuneration report of Zalando SE, Berlin, prepared to comply with Section 162 AktG ["Aktiengesetz": German Stock Corporation Act] for the fiscal year from January 1 to December 31, 2022 and the related disclosures. We have not audited the content of the disclosures of the remuneration report in sections "1.3.1 Introduction" and "1.3.2 Background" where they go beyond the scope of Section 162 AktG.
Responsibilities of the executive directors and the supervisory board
The executive directors and Supervisory Board of Zalando SE are responsible for the preparation of the remuneration report and the related disclosures in compliance with the requirements of Section 162 AktG. In addition, the executive directors and Supervisory Board are responsible for such internal control as they determine is necessary to enable the preparation of a remuneration report and the related disclosures that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditor's responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this remuneration report and the related disclosures based on our audit. We conducted our audit in compliance with German Generally Accepted Standards for Financial Statement Audits promulgated by the Institut der Wirtschaftsprüfer [Institute of Public Auditors in Germany] (IDW). Those standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the remuneration report and the related disclosures are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts in the remuneration report and the related disclosures. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment. including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the remuneration report and the related disclosures, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the preparation of the remuneration report and the related disclosures in order to plan and perform audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity's internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by the executive directors and the Supervisory Board, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the remuneration report and the related disclosures.
We believe that the evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, on the basis of the knowledge obtained in the audit, the remuneration report for the fiscal year from January 1 to December 31, 2022 and the related disclosures comply, in all material respects, with the financial reporting provisions of Section 162 AktG. We do not express an opinion on the content of the abovementioned disclosures of the remuneration report that go beyond the scope of Sec. 162 AktG.
Other matter - formal audit of the remuneration report
The audit of the content of the remuneration report described in this auditor's report comprises the formal audit of the remuneration report required by Section 162 (3) AktG and the issue of a report on this audit. As we are issuing an unqualified opinion on the audit of the content of the remuneration report, this also includes the opinion that the disclosures pursuant to Section 162 (1) and (2) AktG are made in the remuneration report in all material respects.
Limitation of liability
The "General Engagement Terms for Wirtschaftsprüfer and Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaften [German Public Auditors and Public Audit Firms]" as issued by the IDW on January 1, 2017, which are attached to this report, are applicable to this engagement and also govern our responsibility and liability to third parties in the context of this engagement.
Stuttgart, March 6, 2023
Ernst & Young GmbH Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft
Ludwig Wirtschaftsprüfer [German Public Auditor] Werling Wirtschaftsprüfer [German Public Auditor]