XENORA MINERALS LTD — Capital/Financing Update 2017

Nov 9, 2017

ASX Announcement 10 November 2017

==> picture [114 x 68] intentionally omitted <==

WIDESPREAD PEGMATITE-HOSTED LITHIUM AND TIN POTENTIAL OUTLINED AT SOLDIERS CREEK PROJECT, NT

Three new lithium prospects outlined by mapping and sampling at Soldiers Creek, located south of the Bynoe Lithium Field – currently being explored by multiple companies

HIGHLIGHTS

• Results received from maiden mapping and sampling program over the recently granted Soldiers Creek Project, located west of Katherine and south of the Bynoe Lithium Field in the Northern Territory.

• Three new lithium prospects outlined with the Muldiva and Buldiva areas returning:

• Rock chip results to 2,235ppm Li2O, 1,400ppm Ta, 431ppm Cs, and 331ppm Nb;

• 800m of strike with anomalous pXRF soil results for Sn, and other Li-related elements;

• Up to 75% SnO2 (tin) in pan concentrates, with eight samples averaging 52%; and

• o Very high tin content in alluvium

• The Collia area has:

• 800x1500m of abundant sheeted pegmatite exposed within the Soldiers Creek Granite;

• Rock chip results to 1,636ppm Li2O, and 632ppm Cs;

• Pan Concentrate tin values up to 54% SnO2; and

• Highly anomalous REE values in concentrates

  • 1.22% Ce, 5930ppm Y, 6070ppm La and 4870ppm Nd

• Further mineralogical work is in progress, prior to planning a 2018 program

Todd River Resources Limited (ASX: TRT) is pleased to advise that it has outlined three extensive pegmatite-hosted lithium prospects with very high tin values at the recently granted Soldiers Creek Project area, located west of Katherine in the Northern Territory (Figure 1).

The Soldiers Creek EL 31209 covers 181 blocks, some 160km to the south of Darwin and west of Katherine. The tenement was granted to Todd River in December 2016, clearing the way for it to undertake the first-ever field program at the project in September.

The tenement covers most of the Wingate Mountain pegmatite district of the Litchfield pegmatite belt within the Pine Creek Orogen of Paleoproterozoic rocks. The Bynoe pegmatite field, which lies to the north, has had significant lithium exploration work conducted on it over the last two years by companies such as Core Exploration (ASX: CXO), Liontown Resources (ASX: LTR), and Kingston Resources (ASX: KSN).

ABN 45 600 308 398 Level 1 282 Rokeby Road Subiaco WA 6008 | PO Box 2019 Subiaco WA 6904 P +61 8 9327 0950 | F +61 8 9327 0901 | E corporate@trrltd.com.au

www.trrltd.com.au

==> picture [31 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

Earlier this year, Core Exploration defined the first Lithium Mineral Resource in the Northern Territory at the Grants Prospect. It has also recently purchased Liontown’s tenure in the Bynoe Field for $3.5 million (cash plus shares), with a further $1.5 million payable on the definition of a Mineral Resource exceeding 5 million tonnes (see Liontown’s ASX release on 14 September 2017).

==> picture [435 x 471] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1. Location of the Soldiers Creek Project, showing the three prospect areas mapped.

Three historical tin mining centres are located on the southern portion of the Wingate Mountain district, and within EL 31209. The Muldiva and Buldiva historical tin mining centres are immediately west of the Fish River homestead, while the Collia (Collah) tin field is near the southern boundary of the licence (Figure 1).

Historical tin and tantalum mining in these areas was predominantly from both alluvial (creek sand) and eluvial (soil) material, with only minor production from pegmatite.

2

==> picture [31 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

Production resulted in cassiterite (a tin oxide mineral) and a smaller amount of tantalite (Fe-Mn tantalum oxide mineral) concentrates being produced. Recorded historical tin production from these three tin fields was 45.7 tonnes.

Program of Work Completed

Todd River completed an initial program of geological mapping and sampling over the three prospect areas during September. A full assessment of the results received is provided below.

Geological Mapping

Geological mapping was completed over all historical mining areas and covered the extent of the known pegmatite. Collia has the most extensive area of workings and mapping covering an area of 2.5km x 1.5km area for 2.3km[2] (Figure 2). Buldiva and Muldiva (Figure 3) were combined as the main workings were almost along strike from each other. In total, at Muldiva/Buldiva a strike length of 1,500 metres was mapped.

The country rock over much of the tenement is the Burrell Creek Formation of the Finiss River Group, which forms the western margin sequence of the Pine Creek Orogen. The same sequence hosts many of the Bynoe Sn-Ta-Li pegmatites, some 150km to the north. The Burrell Creek Formation in the mapped areas comprises greenschist facies metamorphosed turbidites – siltstones, phyllites and schists, which have been tightly folded along NW striking axes as part of the Litchfield Event ca. 1850Ma.

The tin and tantalum mineralisation at Collia and Buldiva/Muldiva is genetically and spatially associated with the Soldiers Creek Granite, which crops out along the western side of the tenement and over much of the Collia mining area. It is a differentiated granite forming part of the Allia Creek Suite of peraluminous S-type granites.

Pegmatites bearing tin, tantalum and lithium form a late phase related to the granite intrusion, being focussed at the apical or roof zones of granites where incompatible elements are concentrated both within and exterior to the granite.

Pegmatites comprise mostly: albite and microcline feldspars, quartz, and muscovite. The presence of spodumene has been confirmed (in 20-40% of the pegmatites) on the Bynoe field by Core Exploration’s work over the last year. Generally with weathering to moderate depth (5-30+ metres) there is no fresh spodumene identifiable at surface, having, with the feldspars, been weathered to kaolinite clay. Accessory minerals, both in the pegmatites and in proximal altered-granite, include: cassiterite, tantalite, apatite, tourmaline, and fluorite.

At Collia, most of the area with historical mining comprises granite sub-crop with much of the original soil/eluvium layer (up to two metres thick) removed and treated to recover heavy minerals in unconsolidated sand/soil material.

Collia Geology

Geological mapping over a 2.5km x 1.5km area at Collia outlined abundant pegmatites hosted by the Soldiers Creek Granite (Figure 2). To the west and north, Cretaceous and Tertiary sediments mask the prospective package. Historical alluvial mining activity appears to continue further to the south, outside of the tenement. Much of the historical processing of the alluvials appears to have been conducted on the Fish River and at the Collia waterhole, just east of the mapping area.

3

==> picture [31 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [482 x 334] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 4. Collia geological mapping area. Low ridge of pegmatite and aplite.

Within the central granite/pegmatite area, which has seen the most historical mining activity, outcrop is variable. Low hills are generally crested by aplitic or pegmatitic dykes and mostly strike north-east or NNE.

Granite is exposed on hill flanks, and in creek exposures, and elsewhere there is a thin (<1m thick) residual granitic “grus” soil. Most exposures are only weakly to moderately weathered, and the weathering depth appears quite thin (a few to several metres).

Pegmatites rarely exceed two metres thickness, but are abundant and frequently occur in sheeted sub-parallel swarms trending to the NNE or north-east, and dipping shallowly to the north-west. Several small (to 200m long) outcrops of the Burrell Creek Formation occur over the area, indicating that the whole area is on the granite stock roof (pendant zone), where the most fractionation would have occurred.

The area mapped is the extreme southern extent of the Soldiers Creek Granite. It is wrapped and bound, to the west and south, by the regional Collia Fault. Historical mining has covered a significant area, some 1500m x 1200m. The area has ca. 20m of topography, with low ridges of reasonably fresh aplite/pegmatite/granite (Figure 4), flats with grus and thin (<1m) soils on weathered granite, and broad shallow creek lines with up to two metres of alluvium on basement outcrop.

4

==> picture [31 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

There are several shallow creek lines up to 1km long traversing the area between the Fish River to the east and a tributary to the west.

Mining appears to have been undertaken by front-end loader/excavator where all the alluvium was taken for processing from most of the creek lines in the area. Processing would have been via a screen and scrubber/trammel, and then heavy mineral collection by jigs and/or spirals.

Buldiva/Muldiva Geology

Both areas were mapped and have the main hard-rock target being a north-west striking pegmatite body which crops out intermittently for 600m at Buldiva (Figure 3) and over some 100m at Muldiva (Figure 5).

There is a 150m offset between the strike of the two pegmatite zones, coinciding with an area of Cretaceous sandstone cover, with the Muldiva trend to the north-east of the strike line at Buldiva. This trend is open to both the north, where it goes under further Cretaceous cover, and to the south.

The pegmatites noted are steeply-dipping, lenticular, up to 10m thick, and are predominantly quartzmuscovite types, with lesser amounts of feldspar noted (Figure 6). In addition to the main pegmatite line there are several smaller pegmatite and aplite zones (<1m thick) mapped, within a broad ca. 150m wide and 1500m long corridor.

Pegmatite preferentially intrudes the less competent Burrell Creek Formation lithologies – phyllites and pelitic units. The far northernmost exposure of the Soldiers Creek Granite occurs some 150 metres to the west of the gap between Buldiva and Muldiva (Figure 3). A major sub-parallel fault to the east of the workings divides the Burrell Creek Formation from the younger Depot Creek Sandstone.

Despite diggings up to 2m deep on pegmatite, essentially all mining from these two areas was of alluvium. Here the topography was greater with steep slopes and well defined narrow creeks containing only a modest alluvial load. Downslope/downstream material from all pegmatite outcrops appears to have been processed.

There are three creek tributaries at Buldiva and a single creek line at Muldiva with evidence of mining. The amount of mined material would be considerably lower at Buldiva/Muldiva, compared to Collia.

5

==> picture [31 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [381 x 286] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 5. Mapping and sampling at the Muldiva Prospect area, Soldiers Creek.

==> picture [397 x 298] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 6.

Part of the historic workings at the Buldiva Prospect area, Soldiers Creek.

6

==> picture [31 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

Sampling Program

105 rock chip samples were collected and submitted for laboratory analysis while mapping progressed over the tenement. All areas of workings and the surrounds were soil sampled using a portable XRF unit, for 1080 analyses. A further 32 -80 mesh soil samples were submitted for laboratory analysis. 5-20kg of creek alluvium (8 from Buldiva, 1 from Muldiva, and 13 from Collia) was collected and then panned to generate a pan concentrate for analysis.

Details of the sampling procedures can be found in Appendix A, while results for relevant elements are tabulated in Appendix B.

Rock Chip Sampling

48 rock chip samples from the combined Buldiva and Muldiva area (Figure 3) were submitted for analysis along with 57 from Collia (Figure 2). 1-4kg rock samples were analysed at ALS for a lithium suite of elements by Na2O2 fusion and ICP-MS finish (details in Appendix A).

Significant lithium assays include a 2235ppm Li2O result at Buldiva and a maximum value of 1636ppm Li2O at Collia. Support with the lithium is outlined in Table 1. Elevated values for caesium (Cs), niobium (Nb) and tantalum (Ta) in over 40 samples confirm that all pegmatite is of the highly prospective LCT (Lithium-Caesium-Tantalum) type. Results from other trace and major elements, such as elevated Rb, Sn, P, confirm this interpretation.

Table 1. Maximum rock chip samples results for pegmatite related elements.

ROCK CHIP	Maximum Values	Maximum Values
SAMPLING	Li2O (ppm)	Cs(ppm)	Nb(ppm)	Ta(ppm)
Buldiva/	2235	431	331	1400
Muldiva
Collia	1636	632	135	<100

Soil Sampling

Soil samples over the three prospect area were analysed with portable XRF (pXRF), for a total of 1080 analyses. Samples were of B horizon soil directly onto the ground surface at spacings of 25m along lines on lines 100m or 50m apart. Samples were determined on SOIL Mode with a 60 second read time. At Collia 729 analyses were obtained over a 2.0 sqkm area (Figure 7). At Buldiva/Muldiva an area of 0.4 sqkm was covered with 351 analyses (Figure 8).

The Olympus Delta pXRF unit used does not analyse lithium, but several pegmatite-related elements can be determined and were used for anomaly and lithogeochemical discrimination mapping of the areas of Sn-Ta-Li pegmatite.

Results (Appendix B) show the areas of pegmatites clearly outlined by >75ppm tin (Sn) results, as shown in Figures 7 and 8. At Collia, an area of 1800m x 800m was anomalous at the 75pppm Sn threshold, a total of 219 samples or 30% of the dataset for the area.

7

==> picture [31 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

800m of strike was anomalous at Buldiva and 150m at Muldiva, at the same threshold. There is broad but patchy support in the pXRF data from Nb and Ta, as would be expected of these incompatible elements.

The 32 -80 mesh soil samples submitted to ALS were analysed for the same suite as the rock samples and broadly corroborated the pXRF values, if with minor variations in background/threshold values. The pXRF dataset has a much smaller sample size, and so is less representative and therefore suffers with more variable results.

Pan Concentrate Sampling

A total of 22 pan concentrate samples were collected, weighed, and then concentrated by panning (Figure 9) till a 10-150g concentrate was formed – one from Muldiva, eight from Buldiva and 13 from the Collia area. All were taken from active creek and non-trap sites. This was analysed by the same suite of elements as the rock samples, with results shown on Figures 2 and 3 and Appendix B.

Samples from Buldiva had abundant cassiterite (SnO2) in the pan concentrates, with eight samples containing more than 20% cassiterite, in fact, the only other sample was taken from a creek that did not drain from the pegmatite area. The eight samples averaged 51.5% SnO2 , with the highest value being 74.65% SnO2 in concentrate.

Collia also had good high-grade tin-in-concentrate , not surprisingly given most of the creeks had been mined for cassiterite, with some lower values likely due to the removal of ore sands. Values ranged up to 54.21% SnO2 , with four above 20% SnO2, and averaged 17% SnO2 in concentrate.

The sands from Buldiva and Collia have a calculated sand content that is likely to be, for any reasonable tonnage, economic, with Collia still having significant tonnage potential.

Average Tin Content

Buldiva 0.196% SnO2 in alluvial material sampled Collia 0.012% SnO2 in alluvial material sampled

Note: Average of the 8 and 12 samples (respectively) that drain areas of pegmatite. These values are not intended to represent grade values, and no Mineral Resource has been determined.

While poorly recorded, historical alluvial tin mining in the Northern Territory had average mined grades in the range of 0.01 to 0.02% SnO2. Compared to these values the Buldiva creek sands are very high grade.

Muldiva has a small pegmatite outcrop and a single creek with minimal alluvial load. The only alluvial sand sample able to be collected was taken some 400m down steam and had low cassiterite content. None of the lithium-bearing minerals will persist into alluvial material, as they break down to clays, which get eroded and washed away.

Intriguingly, most of the Collia pan conc. samples returned highly anomalous rare earth element (REE) values , particularly the light REE. Maximum values of 12200ppm (1.22%) Cerium (Ce), 5930ppm yttrium (Y), 6070ppm lanthanum (La), and 4870ppm neodymium (Nd) highlight the area (Figure 10).

8

==> picture [31 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

A REE-bearing mineral, such as monazite, allanite or xenotime, must be common in the Collia alluvium, having been derived from the decomposition of the underlying pegmatite and granite. Additional analyses and mineralogical determination work is ongoing.

Discussion

A relatively quick and cost effective program of mapping and sampling by Todd River at the Soldiers Creek project has outlined three areas of lithium-bearing pegmatites, in an area that has had no previous work focused on lithium.

The existing tin mining activity provides a focus and indicates potential size of the lithium-bearing pegmatite system being greater in the vicinity of Collia.

The elevated REE values also suggest the pegmatites could be of either REE-type, and offer another avenue for further work.

Next Steps

Additional analyses are awaited (XRD mineralogy) and petrographic and mineralogical will be done on the samples obtained during this field program, to confirm the lithium and rare-earth minerals present. Once assessed, follow-up work will be planned for early in the 2018 dry season.

Paul E Burton Technical Director

10 November 2017

9

==> picture [31 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [473 x 355] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 9.

Pan concentrate from the Buldiva prospect area, with abundant cassiterite (black grains).

Enquiries: Paul Burton, Technical Director + 61 (0) 8 9327 0950

Nicholas Read Read Corporate + 61 (0) 8 9388 1474

Competent Person Statement

The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results is based on, and fairly represents, information and supporting documentation compiled by Exploration Manager Mr Kim Grey B.Sc. and M. Econ. Geol. Mr Grey is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists, and an employee of Todd River Resources Limited. Mr Grey has sufficient experience relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Grey consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appear.

10

==> picture [31 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

Forward-Looking Statements

This announcement has been prepared by Todd River Resources Ltd. This announcement is in summary form and does not purport to be all inclusive or complete. Recipients should conduct their own investigations and perform their own analysis in order to satisfy themselves as to the accuracy and completeness of the information, statements and opinions contained.

This is for information purposes only. Neither this nor the information contained in it constitutes an offer, invitation, solicitation or recommendation in relation to the purchase or sale of Todd River Resources Ltd shares in any jurisdiction.

This does not constitute investment advice and has been prepared without taking into account the recipient's investment objectives, financial circumstances or particular needs and the opinions and recommendations in this presentation are not intended to represent recommendations of particular investments to particular persons. Recipients should seek professional advice when deciding if an investment is appropriate. All securities transactions involve risks, which include (among others) the risk of adverse or unanticipated market, financial or political developments. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Todd River Resources Ltd, its officers, employees, agents and advisers do not make any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the currency, accuracy, reliability or completeness of any information, statements, opinions, estimates, forecasts or other representations contained in this announcement. No responsibility for any errors or omissions from this arising out of negligence or otherwise is accepted.

This may include forward looking statements. Forward looking statements are only predictions and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions which are outside the control of Todd River Resources Ltd. Actual values, results or events may be materially different to those expressed or implied. For more information please see the company’s website at www.trrltd.com.au

11

==> picture [31 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [437 x 626] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2. Collia area geological mapping showing rock chip and pan concentrate sampling tin (Sn) results.

12

==> picture [31 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [431 x 628] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 3. Buldiva and Muldiva area geological mapping showing rock chip and pan concentrate sampling tin (Sn) results.

13

==> picture [31 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [422 x 619] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 7. Collia area. pXRF soil sampling tin (Sn) results.

14

==> picture [31 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [406 x 593] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 8. Buldiva and Muldiva area. pXRF soil sampling tin (Sn) results.

15

==> picture [31 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [411 x 592] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 10. Collia area showing rock chip and pan concentrate sampling Light Rare Earth Element (LREE) results. LREE = Lanthanum (La) + Cerium (Ce) + Praseodymium (Pr) + Neodymium (Nd) + Samarium (Sm) + Europium (Eu).

16

==> picture [31 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

Appendix A - JORC Table One - Sampling Techniques and Data

Soldiers Creek – Rock Chip, pXRF Soils and Pan Concentrate Sampling

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Sampling techniques	Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random	B-horizon material was analysed by an
	chips, or specific specialised industry standard	Olympus Delta Professional portable XRF unit
	measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under	in the field. Sample sites were determined by
	investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or	GPS position. No sample preparation was
	handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should	conducted other than removing the A-horizon
	not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling.	organic surface layer (up to 1 cm thick).
	Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample	5-10kg alluvial samples were panned on site to
	representivity and the appropriate calibration of any	a concentrate being 15-150g for analysis.
	measurement tools or systems used.	1-4kg Rock Chip samples taken.
	Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are	All samples submitted to ALS with industry
	Material to the Public Report.	standard crushing (rocks only) and
		pulverisation (>90% <75um).
Drilling techniques	Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer,	Not relevant
	rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg
	core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond
	tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is
	oriented and if so, by what method, etc).
Drill sample recovery	Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample	Not relevant
	recoveries and results assessed.
	Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure
	representative nature of the samples.
	Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and
	grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to
	preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.
Logging	Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and	Soil sampling and pan concentrate sites were
	geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support	described briefly for: regolith type and lithology
	appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies	(if seen). Rock samples had a full geological
	and metallurgical studies.	description recorded. All logging was
	Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core	qualitative.
	(or costean, channel, etc) photography.
	The total length and percentage of the relevant
	intersectionslogged.
Sub-sampling techniques	If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all	All pXRF soil samples were of dry soil material
and sample preparation	core taken.	dominated by fines (silt and clay material).
	If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc	No sub sampling was conducted.
	and whether sampled wet or dry.	No field duplicate readings were taken.
	For all sample types, the nature, quality and
	appropriateness of the sample preparation technique.	Standard samples (Certified for lithium,
	Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling	AMIS340, 341, and 342) and Blank samples
	stages to maximise representivity of samples.	(GLG312-2) were inserted into all sample
	Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is	batches. In total 55 standard determinations
	representative of the in situ material collected, including for	were made, along with 11 Blank analyses.
	instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling.	Results were acceptable.
	Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of
	the material being sampled.	Orientation soil sampling lines were conducted
		in all three areas to allow comparison of pXRF
		data with laboratory soil results. Results were
		broadly comparable and allowed anomalous
		thresholds to be determined in the pXRF data.
		Given the sample medium and the results of
		the orientation surveys the pXRF sample
		material is considered appropriate for the grain
		size and representative of the material
		sampled.

17

==> picture [31 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

Quality of assay data and	The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying	The Olympus Delta Professional pXRF unit
laboratory tests	and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique	was on GEOCHEM Mode with a 60 second
	is considered partial or total.	read time (30 seconds beam 1 and 30 seconds
	For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF	beam 2).
	instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the	Three certified lithium standards and a certified
	analysis including instrument make and model, reading	blank sample were analysed during pXRF soil
	times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc.	sampling, at a rate of 1 in 16 samples.
	Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards,	Standards used were AMIS-340, AMIS-341,
	blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether	and AMIS-342, together with Blank GLG312-2.
	acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision	pXRF results for the standards and the blank
	have been established.	were acceptable, and no calibration factors
		have been applied.
		The same standard and blank samples were
		inserted into the batches submitted for
		laboratory analysis – rock chip, -80 mesh soil,
		and pan concentrate – at a rate of between 1 in
		10 and 1 in 25.
		Results for these standards were acceptable.
		Given the above QA/QC work the pXRF soil
		data is considered to have acceptable levels of
		accuracy and precision for the elements of
		interest.
Verification of sampling and	The verification of significant intersections by either	Sampling was conducted by the field
assaying	independent or alternative company personnel.	geologists and field assistants, under the
	The use of twinned holes.	supervision of the exploration manager.
	Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data	All data was entered into standardized
	verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols.	spreadsheets on field laptops and uploaded
	Discuss any adjustment to assay data.	into the company Access database.
		No adjustments have been made to the
		primary assay data
Locations of data points	Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes	All sampling locations were located up using a
	(collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings	standard GPS unit to an accuracy of ca. 3-5m
	and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation.	for Easting, Northing and RL.
	Specification of the grid system used.	All coordinate data for the Soldiers Creek
	Quality and adequacy of topographic control.	project are in MGA_GDA94 Zone 53.
Data spacing and	Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.	Sampling was of an exploratory and
distribution	Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to	reconnaissance nature and spacings are
	establish the degree of geological and grade continuity	insufficient to establish continuity or define
	appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve	Mineral Resources.
	estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied.
	Whether sample compositing has been applied.
Orientation of data in	Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased	Samples were point sampled and so do not
relation to geological	sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this	relate to the orientation of the mineralisation
structure	is known, considering the deposit type.	noted.
	If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the
	orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to
	have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed
	andreportedif material.
Sample security	The measures taken to ensure sample security.	All samples were under company supervision
		at all times prior to delivering to ALS
		laboratories in Alice Springs.
Audits or reviews	The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques	See above note on the orientation soil lines –
	and data.	to compare pXRF and laboratory data.
		No sampling audits have been conducted at
		the Soldiers Creek project to date.

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Mineral	Type, reference name/number, location and ownership	The Soldiers Creek Project is located on tenement
tenement and	including agreements or material issues with third parties	EL 31209 held by 100% Todd River Metals Pty Ltd, which is
	suchas jointventures, partnerships, overridingroyalties,	wholly-owned subsidiary of ToddRiver ResourcesLimited.

18

==> picture [31 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

land tenure	native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national	The tenement is in good standing with no know impediments.	The tenement is in good standing with no know impediments.
status	park and environmental settings.
	The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along
	with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate
	in the area.
Exploration	Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other	All significant previous work is outlined in NTGS open file
done by other	parties.	reports and in the Todd River Prospectus dated January
parties		2017 and the independent Geologist’s report therein.
		All work conducted by TRT is included here.
Geology	Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation.	In all three mapped prospect areas the target is lithium,
		accumulated in LCT type pegmatite associated with the
		Soldiers Creek Granite. This model has been confirmed by
		the work conducted and reported here, but further work is
		required prior to any quantification of lithium potential.
Drill hole	A summary of all information material to the understanding of	Not relevant
Information	the exploration results including a tabulation of the following
	information for all Material drill holes:
	o Easting and northing of the drill collar
	o Elevation of RL (Reduced Level – elevation above
	sea level in metres) of the drill collar
	o Dip and azimuth of the hole
	o Down hole length and interception depth
	o Hole length
Data	In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques,		No aggregation or averaging was conducted on
aggregation	maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades)		the data reported here.
methods	and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated.
	Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results
	and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such
	aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such
	aggregations should be shown in detail.
	The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should
	be clearly stated.
Relationship	These relationships are particularly important in the reporting	The true orientation (dip and strike) of the mineralisation
between	of Exploration Results.	noted at surface is not well defined. At Buldiva/Muldiva the
mineralisation	If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill	pegmatite is	steep dipping, while most of the pegmatites at
widths and	hole angle is known, its nature should be reported.	Collia are dipping shallowly to the NW. All data presented
intercept	If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported,	here is point	data and no widths are reported.
lengths	there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole
	length, true width not known’).
Diagrams	Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations	See Figures	1, 2, 3, 7, 8, and 10.
	of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery
	being reported These should include, but not be limited to a
	plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate
	sectional views.
Balanced	Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is	All rock, pan	conc, and pXRF soil data results are plotted on
reporting	not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high	Figures 2, 3,	7, 8 and 10.
	grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading	See Appendix B for full assay listings of the rock chip and
	reporting of Exploration Results.	pan concentrate data.
Other	Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be	No substantial new information is available other than that
substantive	reported including (but not limited to): geological	reported above.
exploration	observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical
data	survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment;
	metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater,
	geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or
	contaminating substances.
Further work	The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for	Mineralogical work is continuing, prior to planning a program
	lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out	for the 2018 field season.
	drilling).
	Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible
	extensions, including the main geological interpretations and

19

future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive.

==> picture [31 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

20

==> picture [31 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

Appendix B – Sample Results Rock Chip and Pan Concentrate Samples Pan Concentrate Data

Coordinates are MGA94 Zone53

SampleID	Prospect	Easting	Northing	SnO2_%	Ce_ppm	La_ppm	Nd_ppm	Pr_ppm	Sm_ppm
SCA01	Buldiva	695579	8429326	68.56	13.2	6.08	6.44	1.42	1.77
SCA02	Buldiva	695602	8429274	0.93	29.2	11.5	13.1	3.2	3.59
SCA03	Buldiva	695813	8429328	74.65	13.6	5.52	6.32	1.61	1.62
SCA04	Buldiva	695700	8429230	24.69	34.3	15.45	15.3	3.9	5.33
SCA05	Buldiva	695671	8429202	35.42	44.3	19.45	19.4	5.6	8.97
SCA06	Buldiva	695828	8429315	44.56	29	12.9	12.6	3.43	6.02
SCA07	Buldiva	695854	8429309	41.26	33.6	16.35	14.25	3.95	4.51
SCA08	Buldiva	695952	8429398	73.00	10.5	5.3	4.48	1.29	1.18
SCA09	Muldiva	695512	8430177	0.27	18	8.74	8.14	2.13	1.97
SCA10	Collia	704648	8410812	28.44	956	517	356	102	77.7
SCA11	Collia	705009	8410951	54.21	1425	680	497	148	115.5
SCA12	Collia	704093	8411410	0.57	721	325	294	84.6	59.5
SCA13	Collia	703727	8411307	12.51	6420	2990	2480	714	551
SCA14	Collia	704076	8411520	15.17	1285	573	518	148	112
SCA15	Collia	704369	8411242	33.77	3740	1750	1405	409	307
SCA16	Collia	704523	8411156	8.18	7350	3480	2750	789	600
SCA17	Collia	704807	8411129	0.29	450	213	174.5	50.9	31.1
SCA18	Collia	704666	8411343	0.90	1920	842	718	201	150.5
SCA19	Collia	705381	8410865	44.94	3370	1480	1260	369	275
SCA20	Collia	704583	8411472	6.47	12200	6070	4870	1385	1135
SCA21	Collia	704407	8411703	19.42	8510	3880	3290	944	732
SCA22	Collia	703337	8411203	0.17	1595	753	606	168.5	128

21

==> picture [31 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

Appendix B – Sample Results Rock Chip Sample Data

==> picture [417 x 619] intentionally omitted <==

22

==> picture [31 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [429 x 651] intentionally omitted <==

23

==> picture [31 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [425 x 651] intentionally omitted <==

24

==> picture [31 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [399 x 651] intentionally omitted <==

25

==> picture [31 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [483 x 552] intentionally omitted <==

26

==> picture [31 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [483 x 563] intentionally omitted <==

27

==> picture [31 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [483 x 563] intentionally omitted <==

28

==> picture [31 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [451 x 562] intentionally omitted <==

29