Annual Report • Jun 11, 2021
Annual Report
Open in ViewerOpens in native device viewer
ANNUAL REPORT for the year ended 31 March 2021
Worldwide Healthcare Trust PLC (the "Company") is a specialist investment trust which invests in the global healthcare sector with the objective of achieving a high level of capital growth.
In order to achieve its investment objective, the Company invests worldwide in a diversified portfolio of shares in pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies and related securities in the healthcare sector. It uses gearing, and derivative transactions to enhance returns and mitigate risk. Performance is measured against the MSCI World Health Care Index on a net total return, sterling adjusted basis ("Benchmark"). Further details of the Company's investment policy are set out in the Strategic Report on pages 7 and 8.
The healthcare sector is global and accessing this market as a UK investor can be difficult. Within the UK, there are diminishing options for investment as the universe of healthcare companies is shrinking through merger and acquisition activity.
The Company offers an opportunity to gain exposure to pharmaceutical, biotechnology and related companies in the healthcare sector on a global scale.
Worldwide Healthcare Trust PLC is able to participate in all aspects of healthcare, anywhere in the world because of its broad investment mandate. These may include patented speciality medicines for small patient populations and unpatented generic drugs, in both developed countries and emerging markets. In addition, the Company invests in medical device technologies, life science tools and healthcare services. The overall geographic spread of Worldwide Healthcare Trust PLC is also extensive with investments in the U.S., Europe, Asia and emerging markets.
The Company's shares are traded openly on the London Stock Exchange and can be purchased through a stock broker or other financial intermediary. The shares are available through savings plans (including investment dealing accounts, ISAs, Junior ISAs and SIPPs) which enable both regular monthly investments and lump sum investments in the Company's shares. There are a number of investment platforms that offer these facilities. Further details can be found on page 101.
For more information about Worldwide Healthcare Trust PLC visit the website at www.worldwidewh.com. Follow us on Twitter @worldwidewh.
62-64 Directors' Remuneration Report 65-73 Independent Auditors' Report
Financial Statements 74 Income Statement
For more information about Worldwide Healthcare Trust PLC visit the website at
30.0%
Net asset value per share (total return)*^ 2020: +6.5%
(0.2%)%
(Discount)/Premium of share price to net asset value per share*^ 2020: 1.8%
27.4%
Share price (total return)*^ 2020: +8.0%
22.0p
Dividends per share 2020: 25.0p
16.0%
Benchmark*† ^ 2020: +5.7%
0.9%
Ongoing Charges^ 2020: 0.9%
*Source: Morningstar
† MSCI World Health Care Index on a net total return, sterling adjusted basis. (See Glossary beginning on page 97).
^ Alternative Performance Measure (see Glossary beginning on page 97).
Rebased to 100 as at 31 March 2020 Source: Morningstar
Rebased to 100 as at 28 April 1995. Source: Morningstar, Thomson Reuters & Bloomberg * With effect from 1 October 2010, the performance of the Company is measured against the MSCI World Health Care Index on a net total return, sterling adjusted basis. Prior to this date, performance was measured against the Datastream World Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology Index (total return, sterling adjusted)
Rebased to 100 as at 31 March 2016. Source: Morningstar.
| 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net asset value per share (total return)*† | (9.0%) | 28.9% | 2.8% | 13.7% | 6.5% | 30.0% |
| Benchmark (total return)*† | (5.4%) | 24.5% | (2.5%) | 21.1% | 5.7% | 16.0% |
| Net asset value per share | 1,850.9p | 2,367.2p | 2,411.1p | 2,722.9p | 2,868.9p | 3,703.0p |
| Share price | 1,715.0p | 2,304.0p | 2,405.0p | 2,730.0p | 2,920.0p | 3,695.0p |
| (Discount)/Premium of share price to net asset value per share† |
(7.3%) | (2.7%) | (0.3%) | 0.3% | 1.8% | (0.2%) |
| Dividends per share | 16.5p | 22.5p | 17.5p | 26.5p | 25.0p | 22.0p |
| Leverage† | 14.0% | 16.9% | 16.4% | 4.9% | 12.0% | 7.6% |
| Ongoing charges† | 0.9% | 0.9% | 0.9% | 0.9% | 0.9% | 0.9% |
| Ongoing charges (including performance fees paid or crystallised during the year)† |
2.1% | 1.0% | 1.2% | 1.1% | 0.9% | 0.9% |
*Source: Morningstar
† Alternative Performance Measure (see Glossary beginning on page 97).
*Source: Morningstar
Sir Martin Smith
As a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic, the last year has been extremely challenging in health, economic and political terms.
Against this background, I am pleased to report that the year ended 31 March 2021 has again been a successful one for the Company. The Company's net asset value per share total return was +30.0% and the share price total return was +27.4%, significantly outperforming the Company's Benchmark, the MSCI World Health Care Index on a net total return, sterling adjusted basis, which rose by 16.0% during the year. The disparity between the performance of the Company's net asset value per share and its share price reflects the premium of the Company's share price to its net asset value per share falling from 1.8% at the start of the Company's financial year to a discount of 0.2% at 31 March 2021.
The positive return over the year to 31 March reflected a very strong first half, when the net asset value per share total return was +23.1% compared to a rise in the Benchmark of 15.3% and a less strong second half when the net asset value total return was +5.6% compared to a rise in the Benchmark of 0.7%. It should be noted that the Company significantly outperformed the Benchmark in both halves of the year. The Company's results were published last year as the full extent of the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on economic activity, and the way we lived and worked, were becoming apparent. During the first half of the year, global markets made up the ground lost after the steep market falls seen in late February/early March 2020 with the onset of the COVID-19 crisis, indeed a number of markets posted record highs. The second half
of the year began on a negative note as a second wave of COVID-19 cases initially caused markets to retrace some of their earlier gains. However, news of the efficacy of a number of vaccines and their fast-track approval for use by authorities fuelled investors' optimism and caused some markets to regain and even surpass their previous highs, helped by hopes that Joe Biden's win in the US presidential election would result in a new round of economic stimulus measures in the US. Investors were further encouraged as the UK and the European Union finally agreed a post-Brexit trade deal thereby removing some of the uncertainty of previous years. However, while many sectors globally (including healthcare) saw new all-time high levels in early calendar 2021, the healthcare sector began to lag wider markets as investors rotated into other sectors and industries with perceived better cyclical recovery prospects.
During the year the Company's Portfolio Manager continued to pursue a strategy of being underweight in large pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies and overweight in emerging markets and emerging biotechnology companies, as the investment opportunities in these areas remained compelling, in part due to the continued strong biotechnology IPO market and increased levels of M&A activity.
It is also pleasing to note that positive performance during the year came as a result of both stock selection and sector allocation across all sectors. Because almost all of the Company's assets are denominated in U.S. dollars, the Company's strong performance was achieved in spite of a strengthening of sterling, particularly against the dollar, where it appreciated by 11.3%. The Company had, on average, leverage of 4.7% during the year which contributed 1.3% to performance (2020: 8.6% contributing 0.5%). As at the year-end leverage stood at 7.6% compared to 12.0% at the beginning of the year. Our Portfolio Manager continues to adopt both a pragmatic and tactical approach with regard to the use of leverage. Please see page 21 for further information on our Portfolio Manager's gearing strategy.
The long-term performance of the Company continues to be strong, and it is pleasing to note that from the Company's inception in 1995 to 31 March 2021, the total return of the Company's net asset value per share has been +4,486.7%, equivalent to a compound annual return of +15.9%. This compares to a cumulative blended Benchmark return of +1,750.1%, equivalent to a compound annual return of +11.9% over the same period.
Further information on the healthcare sector, the Company's investments and performance during the year can be found in the Portfolio Manager's Review beginning on page 13.
I am pleased to report that the Company has continued to perform effectively, with the Company's service providers confirming that their home working arrangements, whilst challenging, have not inhibited their performance.
The Company's share price traded at a premium to the net asset value per share for much of the year. In accordance with the Company's share price premium management policy 10,690,977 new shares were issued during the year at an average premium of 0.8% to the Company's cum income net asset value per share. This issuance gave rise to the receipt of £380.6m of new funds to the Company, which have been invested in line with the investment policy. Since the end of the year a further 752,000 new shares have been issued raising £27.9m of new funds. No shares were repurchased by the Company during the year and to the date of this report.
The scale of new issuance during the year exceeded the shareholder authority granted at the July 2020 AGM. Accordingly, in advance of the authority level being reached, an additional general meeting was held in February 2021 to approve refreshment of the new share issuance authority. As described in the circular issued to shareholders in advance of that meeting, this was to ensure that new share issues could continue uninterrupted. At the February 2021 general meeting authority to issue a further 6.3 million new shares was approved by shareholders. Such authority will again be proposed for renewal at the Company's AGM to be held in July 2021.
This ongoing share issuance programme has triggered the requirement for the Company to publish a prospectus following the year-end. This prospectus will shortly be available on the Company's website and it will provide authority for the issuance of 20 million new shares.
Shareholders will be aware that it remains the Company's policy to pursue capital growth for shareholders and to pay dividends at least to the extent required to maintain investment trust status. Therefore, the level of dividends declared can go down as well as up. An interim dividend of 6.5p per share, for the year ended 31 March 2021, was paid on 11 January 2021 to shareholders on the register on 20 November 2020. Due in large part to the strength of sterling and a reduction in the portfolio yield, the Company's revenue return per share for the year as a whole decreased
to 24.1 pence (2020: 26.9 pence). Accordingly, the Board is proposing a final dividend of 15.5p per share (2020: second interim dividend of 18.5p per share) which, together with the interim dividend already paid, makes a total dividend for the year of 22.0p (2020: 25.0p per share). Based on the closing mid-market share price of 3675.0p on 2 June 2021, the total dividend payment for the year represents a current yield of 0.6%.
The final dividend will be payable, subject to shareholder approval, on 13 July 2021 to shareholders on the register of members on 4 June 2021. The associated ex-dividend date will be 3 June 2021.
The Company's dividend policy will be proposed for approval at the forthcoming Annual General Meeting.
In my statement last year, I mentioned that a process of Board refreshment was underway. Dr David Holbrook, who serves as the Company's Senior Independent Director, will retire at the conclusion of this year's AGM and so will not stand for re‑election. David has made a very significant contribution during his time on the Board and he will be greatly missed by his fellow Directors. We have all greatly enjoyed working with him and wish him the very best for the future. Sarah Bates will succeed David as the Senior Independent Director and Chair of the Nominations Committee.
I intend to retire at the conclusion of next year's Annual General Meeting. It has been agreed that in the interests of maintaining an orderly succession process, Doug McCutcheon will extend his term and assume the Chairmanship following my retirement. As new members are recruited, the Board will remain mindful of its commitment to a policy of diversity.
Shareholders are rightly concerned that their Company should be seen to be investing in companies which operate in a responsible and sustainable way. Our Portfolio Manager has undertaken a comprehensive review of its ESG policies which has included detailed discussion with the Board. Our Portfolio Manager's approach to ESG matters, which is endorsed by the Board, can be found in the Strategic Report on page 34.
As described in previous years, the performance fee provisions compare the performance of the Company since launch with that of the Benchmark. Only when incremental outperformance has been achieved since launch, and is maintained for a twelve-month period, is a performance fee actually paid. These arrangements are described in detail on page 44 of this report.
I am pleased to report that as a result of the continued cumulative outperformance in the year, there was a provision in our year-end accounts of £31.7 million for future performance fee payments. Only if outperformance is maintained to the relevant quarterly calculation dates over the year to 31 March 2022 will this provision become payable.
Our Portfolio Manager has continued to concentrate on its strengths as a fundamental stock picker and has been capitalising on market volatility to improve the quality of the portfolio and to add new investment opportunities.
The impact of the COVID-19 vaccine roll out is beginning to have a positive effect on economic growth. However, in some areas, the changes we have seen in the last two years will be more permanent. These include the increase in internet commerce and the resulting effect this has had on the high street, and changes to working practices. Our Portfolio Manager maintains its belief that there will be continued strong demand for improved healthcare, including more efficient methods of medicine delivery and innovative treatments. They further believe that all of the fundamental investment themes for the healthcare sector remain intact and that their focus remains on the selection of stocks with strong prospects for capital enhancement. Your Board continues to believe that long-term investors in this sector will be well rewarded.
The Board has been watching closely the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic upon the arrangements for the Company's upcoming AGM on Thursday, 8 July 2021.While the COVID-19 related restrictions have been relaxed, it is very difficult to predict how willing people will be to travel to and attend such events. Also, two of our Directors, including our lead Portfolio Manager Sven Borho, live in North America. Accordingly, in order to provide certainty, physical attendance at the AGM (which will be held at the offices of Frostrow Capital LLP ('Frostrow'), 25 Southampton Buildings, London WC2A 1AL) will be kept to the minimum permitted by the Company's Articles of Association. However, there will be an
opportunity for shareholders to ask live questions during the AGM. Details of how shareholders will be able to do this can be found on the Company's website at www.worldwidewh. com. In addition, the AGM will be followed by an interactive Online Shareholder Presentation (the "Presentation") at approximately 1.30pm on Thursday, 8 July 2021. During the Presentation, shareholders will receive an update from our Portfolio Manager followed by an interactive question and answer session. Full details on how to join the Presentation, including how to register, may be found on the Company's website at www.worldwidewh.com. The Presentation will be also available for viewing on the Company's website shortly after 8 July 2021.
Any shareholders who require a hard copy form of proxy may request one from the Registrar, Link Group. Shareholders who hold their shares through an investment platform or a nominee will need to contact them to enquire about voting arrangements. (Please see page 110 for their contact details.) Given shareholders and third parties will be unable to attend the AGM in person, I strongly encourage shareholders to appoint the Chairman of the AGM as their proxy to vote on their behalf.
The votes on the resolutions to be proposed at the AGM will be conducted on a poll. The results of the proxy votes will be published immediately following the conclusion of the AGM by way of a stock exchange announcement and on the Company's website at www.worldwidewh.com.
The Board is committed to holding in person meetings in future when restrictions are not in place and they can be held safely. A resolution is also to be proposed to shareholders at the Company's AGM to adopt new Articles of Association. These will enable a combination of virtual and in person shareholder meetings to be held, and will provide the Board with the flexibility to hold virtual shareholder meetings in the future should the need arise. In addition to amending the provisions of the Articles of Association relating to meetings, certain other technical amendments have been made so that the Articles of Association conform to other applicable legislation and current best practice, in particular, changes have been made to provisions designed to enable the Company to comply with its obligations under various tax reporting requirements. Details of the changes are set out on page 111 of this Annual Report.
Chairman 3 June 2021
The Company invests in the global healthcare sector with the objective of achieving a high level of capital growth.
In order to achieve its investment objective, the Company invests worldwide in a diversified portfolio of shares in pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies and related securities in the healthcare sector. It uses gearing, and derivative transactions to enhance returns and mitigate risk. Performance is measured against the MSCI World Health Care Index on a net total return, sterling adjusted basis ("Benchmark").
The implementation of the Company's Investment Objective has been delegated to OrbiMed by Frostrow (as AIFM) under the Board's and Frostrow's supervision and guidance.
Details of OrbiMed's investment strategy and approach are set out in the Portfolio Manager's Review on pages 13 to 25.
While the Board's strategy is to allow flexibility in managing the investments, in order to manage investment risk it has imposed various investment, gearing and derivative guidelines and limits, within which Frostrow and OrbiMed are required to manage the investments, as set out below.
Any material changes to the Investment Objective, Policy and Benchmark or the investment, gearing and derivative guidelines and limits require approval from shareholders.
At least 20% of the portfolio will normally be invested in smaller companies (i.e. with a market capitalisation of less than U.S.\$10bn);
Investment in unquoted securities will not exceed 10% of the portfolio at the time of acquisition;
In line with the Investment Objective, derivatives are employed, when appropriate, in an effort to enhance returns and to improve the risk-return profile of the Company's portfolio. There are two types of derivatives that were employed within the portfolio during the year: Options and Equity Swaps. Only Equity Swaps were employed as at the year end.
The Board has set the following limits within which derivative exposures are managed:
The Company does not currently hedge against foreign currency exposure.
The Board has set a maximum gearing level, through borrowing, of 20% of the net assets.
Under the AIFMD the Company is required to set maximum leverage limits. Leverage under the AIFMD is defined as any method by which the total exposure of an AIF is increased.
The Company has two current sources of leverage: the overdraft facility, which is subject to the gearing limit; and, derivatives, which are subject to the separate derivative limits. The Board and Frostrow have set a maximum leverage limit of 140% on both the commitment and gross basis.
Further details on the gearing and leverage calculations, and how total exposure through derivatives is calculated, are included in the Glossary beginning on page 97. Further details on how derivatives are employed can be found in note 16 beginning on page 89.
| Market value | % of | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Investments | Country/region | £'000 | investments |
| Bristol-Myers Squibb | USA | 143,574 | 5.9 |
| Merck | USA | 143,189 | 5.9 |
| Boston Scientific | USA | 122,292 | 5.1 |
| AstraZeneca | United Kingdom | 105,393 | 4.3 |
| Horizon Therapeutics | USA | 99,943 | 4.1 |
| Vertex Pharmaceuticals | USA | 81,365 | 3.4 |
| Mirati Therapeutics | USA | 79,416 | 3.3 |
| Natera | USA | 79,203 | 3.3 |
| AbbVie | USA | 73,670 | 3.0 |
| UnitedHealth Group | USA | 71,880 | 3.0 |
| Top 10 investments | 999,925 | 41.3 | |
| Humana | USA | 54,393 | 2.2 |
| Guardant Health | USA | 50,595 | 2.1 |
| Stryker | USA | 50,174 | 2.1 |
| Edwards Lifesciences | USA | 48,686 | 2.0 |
| Intuitive Surgical | USA | 47,706 | 2.0 |
| Novartis | Switzerland | 47,411 | 2.0 |
| Anthem | USA | 47,315 | 1.9 |
| DexCom | USA | 47,068 | 1.9 |
| Theravance Biopharma | USA | 46,396 | 1.9 |
| Haemonetics | USA | 45,975 | 1.9 |
| Top 20 investments | 1,485,644 | 61.3 | |
| Takeda Pharmaceutical | Japan | 42,203 | 1.8 |
| Neurocrine Biosciences | USA | 38,653 | 1.6 |
| Progyny | USA | 34,731 | 1.4 |
| Ikena Oncology | USA | 32,684 | 1.3 |
| Aurinia Pharmaceuticals | Canada | 30,528 | 1.3 |
| Ascendis Pharma | Denmark | 27,052 | 1.2 |
| Vor BioPharma | USA | 25,863 | 1.1 |
| Caris Science (unquoted) | USA | 25,749 | 1.0 |
| Jinxin Fertility Group | China | 24,948 | 1.0 |
| Turning Point Therapeutics | USA | 24,847 | 1.0 |
| Top 30 investments | 1,792,902 | 74.0 | |
| Deciphera Pharmaceuticals | USA | 24,313 | 1.0 |
| ImmunoGen | USA | 23,537 | 1.0 |
| CRISPR Therapeutics | Switzerland | 22,980 | 1.0 |
| Hansoh Pharmaceutical | Hong Kong | 22,832 | 1.0 |
| Oak Street Health | USA | 22,766 | 1.0 |
| Yidu Tech | China | 21,945 | 0.9 |
| New Horizon Health | China | 21,751 | 0.9 |
| Shanghai Bioheart Pharmaceutical (unquoted) | China | 21,533 | 0.8 |
| Shanghai Kindly Medical Instruments | China | 20,974 | 0.8 |
| Iovance Biotherapeutics | USA | 20,254 | 0.8 |
| Top 40 investments | 2,015,787 | 83.2 | |
| Thermo Fisher Scientific | USA | 20,095 | 0.8 |
| Joinn Laboratories China | China | 19,942 | 0.8 |
| Harpoon Therapeutics | USA | 19,117 | 0.8 |
| Arcutis Biotherapeutics | USA | 18,916 | 0.8 |
| Burning Rock Biotech | China | 18,717 | 0.8 |
| Achilles Therapeutics | USA | 16,867 | 0.7 |
| Molina Healthcare | USA | 16,096 | 0.7 |
| Crossover (unquoted) | USA | 15,946 | 0.7 |
| Adverum Biotechnologies | USA | 15,816 | 0.6 |
| MeiraGTx | USA | 15,461 | 0.6 |
| Top 50 investments | 2,192,760 | 90.5 |
| Market value | % of | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Investments | Country/region | £'000 | investments |
| EDDA (unquoted) | China | 14,496 | 0.6 |
| NanoString Technologies | USA | 14,855 | 0.6 |
| Hangzhou Tigermed Consulting | China | 14,630 | 0.6 |
| Arcturus Therapeutics | USA | 14,153 | 0.6 |
| uniQure | Netherlands | 13,448 | 0.6 |
| Ruipeng Pet Group (unquoted) | China | 13,054 | 0.6 |
| Passage BIo | USA | 12,830 | 0.5 |
| Shenzhen Hepalink Pharmaceutical | China | 12,391 | 0.5 |
| Gland Pharma | India | 12,230 | 0.5 |
| Visen (unquoted) | China | 12,092 | 0.5 |
| Top 60 investments | 2,326,939 | 96.1 | |
| Alignment Healthcare | USA | 10,703 | 0.4 |
| Erasca (unquoted) | USA | 9,745 | 0.4 |
| Galapagos | Belgium | 7,728 | 0.3 |
| Alphamab Oncology | China | 7,590 | 0.3 |
| Danaher | USA | 7,503 | 0.3 |
| NanoString Technologies 2.625% 01/03/2025 (unquoted) | USA | 6,945 | 0.3 |
| China Medical System | China | 6,775 | 0.3 |
| Simcere Pharmaceutical Group | China | 5,629 | 0.2 |
| MabPlex International (unquoted) | China | 5,605 | 0.2 |
| Apollo Hospitals Enterprise | India | 5,413 | 0.2 |
| Top 70 investments | 2,400,575 | 99.0 | |
| Abbisko (unquoted) | China | 4,918 | 0.2 |
| Alliance HealthCare Services 20/04/2024* (unquoted) | USA | 4,533 | 0.2 |
| Yuanxin Technology (unquoted) | China | 4,410 | 0.2 |
| Medical Depot Holdings 03/01/2024 (unquoted) | USA | 1,112 | 0.0 |
| Peloton Therapeutics (DCC** – unquoted) | USA | 490 | 0.0 |
| Total equities and fixed interest investments | 2,416,038 | 99.6 | |
| OTC Equity Swaps – Financed^ | |||
| Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine | 41,151 | 1.7 | |
| Apollo Hospitals Enterprise | 35,766 | 1.5 | |
| Aier Eye Hospital Group | China | 25,582 | 1.0 |
| Shandong Pharmaceutical | India | 23,705 | 1.0 |
| BGI Genomics | China | 19,432 | 0.8 |
| Less: Gross exposure on financed swaps | China | (135,084) | (5.6) |
| Total OTC Swaps | China | 10,552 | 0.4 |
| Total investments including OTC swaps | 2,426,590 | 100.0 |
* Includes warrants valued at £1,160,000
** DCC = deferred contingent consideration.
^ See Glossary beginning on page 97 and note 16 beginning on page 89 for further details in relation to the OTC Swaps.
| Investments | Market value £'000 |
% of investments |
|---|---|---|
| Quoted equities | 2,275,409 | 93.8 |
| Unquoted equities | 129,199 | 5.3 |
| Unquoted debt securities | 11,430 | 0.5 |
| Equity swaps | 10,552 | 0.4 |
| Total of all investments | 2,426,590 | 100.0 |
| O%LRWHFKQRORJ\ | |
|---|---|
| O 3KDUPDFHXWLFDO | |
| O+HDOWKFDUH3URYLGHUV 6HUYLFHV | |
| O+HDOWKFDUH(TXLSPHQW6XSSOLHV7HFKQRORJ\ | |
| O/LIH6FLHQFHV7RROV 6HUYLFHV | |
| O'HEW,QVWUXPHQWV |
| O1RUWK\$PHULFD | |
|---|---|
| O(PHUJLQJ0DUNHWV | |
| O(XURSH | |
| O \$VLD |
| O'NTYJHMSTQTL^ | |
|---|---|
| O 5MFWRFHJZYNHFQ | |
| O-JFQYM(FWJ*VZNURJSY8ZUUQNJX9JHMSTQTL^ | |
| O-JFQYMHFWJ5WT[NIJWX8JW[NHJX | |
| O1NKJ8HNJSHJX9TTQX8JW[NHJX | |
| O)JGY.SXYWZRJSYX | |
| O3TWYM&RJWNHF | |
|---|---|
| O*RJWLNSL2FWPJYX | |
| O*ZWTUJ | |
| O &XNF |
|
* See Glossary beginning on page 97.
OrbiMed was founded in 1989 and has evolved over time to be one of the largest dedicated healthcare investment firms in the world. OrbiMed has managed the Company's portfolio since its launch in 1995.
OrbiMed had over U.S.\$17 billion in assets under management as of 31 March 2021, across a range of funds, including investment trusts, hedge funds, mutual funds, and private equity funds.
Within the guidelines set by the Board, the OrbiMed team work constantly to identify sources of outperformance, or alpha, with a focus on fundamental research. In healthcare, there are many primary sources of alpha generation, especially in therapeutics. Clinical events such as the publication of new clinical trial data is a prominent example and historically has been the largest source of share price volatility. Regulatory events, such as new drug approvals by U.S., European, or Japanese regulatory authorities are also stock moving events. Subsequent new product launches are carefully tracked and forecasted. Other sources include legal events and, of course, merger and acquisition activity.
The team has a global focus with a universe of coverage that covers the entire spectrum of companies, from early stage companies with pre-clinical assets to fully integrated biopharmaceutical companies. The universe of actively covered companies is approaching 1,000.
OrbiMed emphasises investments in companies with under-appreciated products in the pipeline, high quality management teams, and adequate financial resources.
A disciplined portfolio construction process is utilised to ensure the portfolio is focused on high conviction positions. Finally, the portfolio is subject to a rigorous risk management process.
The OrbiMed Investment Team continues to expand and now has over 100 investment professionals that cover all aspects of research, trading, finance, and compliance. This includes over 20 degree holders with MD and/or PhD credentials, healthcare industry veterans, and finance professionals with over 20 years of experience.
The firm has a global investment horizon and the OrbiMed footprint now spans three continents with offices in New York, San Francisco, Herzliya (Israel), Shanghai, and Mumbai.
The lead managers with responsibility for the Company's portfolio are as follows:
Sven H. Borho, CFA, is a founder and Managing Partner of OrbiMed. Sven heads the public equity team and he is the portfolio manager for OrbiMed's public equity and hedge funds. He has been a portfolio manager for the firm's funds since 1993 and has played an integral role in the growth of OrbiMed's asset management activities.
He started his career in 1991 when he joined OrbiMed's predecessor firm as a Senior Analyst covering European pharmaceutical firms and biotechnology companies worldwide. Sven studied business administration at Bayreuth University in Germany and received a M.Sc. (Econs.), Accounting and Finance, from The London School of Economics; he is a citizen of both Germany and Sweden.
Trevor M. Polischuk, Ph.D., is a Partner at OrbiMed focused on the global pharmaceutical industry. Trevor joined OrbiMed in 2003 and became a Partner in 2011. Previously, he worked at Lehman Brothers as a Senior Research Analyst covering the U.S. pharmaceutical industry. Trevor began his career at Warner Lambert as a member of the Global Marketing Planning team within Parke-Davis. Trevor holds a Doctorate in Neuropharmacology & Gross Human Anatomy and an M.B.A. from Queen's University, Canada.
The financial year ended 31 March 2021 will perhaps go down in history as one of the most memorable periods for any investor who was an active participant. From the historic decline that immediately preceded the financial year, to the dramatic and rapid recovery, to the culmination of record highs by the close of the year, the period was truly unforgettable. Of course, the pandemic wrought by the SARS-Cov-2 virus was a trigger for these momentous market swings and the recovery trade that ensued.
For proper perspective of the reported financial year, a brief prologue is required. News reports of a novel respiratory virus spreading within China began to percolate in January 2020. Unexpectedly, however, in less than two months the world was under siege due to the emergence of the global pandemic in which an infectious disease, termed COVID-19, brought the global economy to a near standstill. Worldwide lockdowns roiled the equity markets in an unprecedented manner, resulting in a stock market crash of historic proportions, the worst since the Great Depression.
However, the equity market rebound was as nearly as remarkable as the drop and the beginning of the financial year started with a dramatic "V"-shape recovery for global markets. Several factors fuelled this recovery, including aggressive stimulus and policy efforts, vaccine and therapeutics optimism, and a faster than-expected bottoming and rebound in some economic data points. Additionally, this momentum continued into the end of the financial year. Overall, the MSCI World Index total return in the year to 31 March 2021 was nearly +40% (in sterling terms) whilst the S&P 500 Index total return was just over +40% (in sterling terms) as well.
Global healthcare stocks experienced a similar positive start to the financial year after a significant drawdown that immediately preceded the period. However, healthcare stocks were partially defensive during this volatility and
the initial declines were less severe and thus the overall magnitude of the recovery and follow through to year end was less than that of the broader markets. Specifically, the Company's Benchmark, the MSCI World Health Care Index measured on a sterling net total return basis, was up +16.0% for the year ended 31 March 2021.
There were various reasons for this observation. During the early days of this egregious global health crisis, healthcare companies moved to the front and centre of public and investor attention, and as such, healthcare stocks proved to be more resilient during this time. Consequently, the MSCI World Health Care Index fell far less than the broader market indices, from their respective February 2020 highs to their March 2020 lows. Therefore, the resulting rebound for healthcare equities in the first half of the financial year was more subdued than the broader market.
Another notable factor that contributed to healthcare underperformance was an ironic twist of the industry's own success. In December 2020, two companies developing COVID-19 vaccines, Pfizer Inc. and Moderna Inc., reported Phase III data that significantly exceeded expectations, with vaccine efficacy rates of approximately 95% in preventing COVID-19. The stellar result surprised even the most optimistic observers. However, the knock-on effect was that investors concluded that the pandemic would be ending sooner rather than later. This increased demand for many stocks that were otherwise laggards, creating a bid in the broader market rather than the healthcare stocks that were otherwise more resilient in the period.
Regardless, for the year ended 31 March 2021, the Company has reported strong positive returns, both in absolute and relative terms. Specifically, the net asset value per share total return was +30.0% whilst the share price total return was +27.4%. This compares to the Benchmark which advanced +16.0%. The excess return of +14.0% represents the fourth largest in the Company's 26-year tenure.
Overall, since the Company's inception in 1995 to 31 March 2021, the total return of the Company's net asset value per share is +4,486.7%, equivalent to a compound annual return of +15.9%. This compares to the blended benchmark rise of + 1,750.1% equivalent to a compound annual return of +11.9%.
Whilst the financial year will be surely remembered for the COVID "recovery trade", no quarter represented this better than the first quarter of the financial year. The markets roiled in March 2020 but, there was no mistaking the "V"-shape market recovery of April and May 2020. We created a "pandemic playbook" to maximize a putative recovery opportunity which included; (a) looking for extreme share price dislocations, (b) re-focusing on our best ideas, (c) reducing name count when possible, (d) increasing the quality of the portfolio, and (e) selling some names that we expected to be more materially disrupted. This positioning was critical for the first leg of performance during the year as the Company was able to record double-digit returns in each of the first two months of the financial year, with material outperformance of the benchmark at the same time.
Whilst volatility finally started to subside into the second quarter of the financial year, the broader equity markets continued to move higher in the first two months of the quarter, despite increasing COVID-19 infection rates in some portions of the U.S. and worldwide. Technology stocks and other sectors which are more closely tied to economic recovery helped push the S&P 500 to all-time highs during this time. Healthcare stocks, on a relative basis, and despite the continuing pandemic, lost some momentum and lagged the broader markets. However, market volatility did return in the final month of the quarter as investor angst increased over a potential second wave of coronavirus infections worldwide. Whilst this angst (and volatility) did partially subside in the latter half of September, most indices finished September modestly down. With the pandemic back in the headlines, healthcare stocks were defensive to close the second quarter. With macro concerns mostly driving share price action, the Company's performance was mostly in-line with the Benchmark, save for July 2020 where underperformance was primarily driven by a series of idiosyncratic negative events for three different investments in biotechnology and healthcare services.
Market jitters late in the second quarter spilled over to start the third quarter as surging COVID-19 infections across the world continued. However, October nervousness gave way to November exuberance and the outcome was a historic month for a multitude of reasons. President Trump lost his bid to become a twoterm President, stunning efficacy data was announced for two COVID-19 vaccines, and the broad equity markets rallied. The election win by now President Joe Biden and merger & acquisition (M&A) news in biopharmaceuticals both served to rally healthcare stocks. The impressive pivotal data by both Pfizer/BioNtech and Moderna for their COVID-19 vaccines, their rapid approvals by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and positive news flow on a fiscal relief bill in the U.S. helped the broad markets close 2020 at all-time highs. Ironically, the better-thanexpected vaccine efficacy of 95%, created real investor bullishness about the future of the economy, which in turn caused healthcare stocks to lag the broader market. That said, the Company posted strong absolute and relative performance in the quarter. Clear outperformance was sourced from contributions across all subsectors, from M&A, and the tactical use of gearing ahead of the U.S. elections.
For the preponderance of the fourth quarter of the financial year, macro factors dominated the headlines and subsequent trading in the equity markets. These included the "Reddit" effect, highly shorted stocks rising, crowded longs selling off, factor unwinds, interest rate movements, and reflation commentary. The result? Global equities reached all-time highs in March. Technology stocks once again led U.S. indices higher, whilst European equities advanced even more than their U.S. counterparts to end the financial year. Global healthcare stocks also moved higher but again lagged the broader markets, as macro influences dominated share price moves in the period, with fundamentals taking a firm back seat.
For the Company, performance in the quarter was mixed. After a relatively sedate January, meaningful outperformance was generated by the Company in February through a combination of stock picking and sector allocation. However, March saw a large shift in the factor trade from momentum to value, which created significant selling pressure for emerging biotechnology stocks. Additionally, there was some weakness in the emerging markets healthcare segment to close the quarter. The net performance was largely unchanged.
The Company maintains a pan-healthcare investment approach, with a deep analyst team that covers all key sub-sectors of the industry. For the reported period, that strategy reaped many rewards as all sub-sectors contributed to positive absolute returns, including biotechnology (large and small/mid-capitalisation companies), pharmaceuticals (large capitalisation, specialty companies, and Japan), life science tools, health care services, medical devices, and emerging markets.
For the financial year, the largest sub-sector contribution came from biotechnology stocks, contributing over +800 basis points of both absolute and excess return. This contribution can be further divided into contribution from small/mid-capitalisation companies (70%) and large capitalisation (30%). This followed an unprecedented year of drug discovery and development from the biotechnology sector in 2020, coupled with positive investor sentiment that spilled over from the industry's impressive response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Another large contribution came from emerging market stocks, contributing over +650 basis points of both absolute and excess return. These large returns were a function of both allocation and stock selection. Our two-pronged approach proved very successful in the financial year. First, we identified and selectively invested in blue-chip leaders across various healthcare sub-sectors in China which enabled the Company to capitalize on the many macro-growth trends. Second, we focused on the exploding initial public offering (IPO) trend in biotechnology and healthcare stocks in China which created a multitude of new investment opportunities.
Notable contribution also came from pharmaceuticals, specifically specialty pharmaceuticals, with nearly +350 basis points of absolute return, which in turn contributed over +275 basis points of excess return. A final sub-sector of import was life science tools which contributed over +550 basis points of absolute return and over +200 basis points of excess return. Again, these returns were a function of both allocation and stock selection.
We are global investors. Our universe of coverage spans not only all healthcare sub-sectors, but all geographies, from the US to the UK, Europe, Japan, and Emerging Markets. We have an important overweight in biotechnology stocks, especially small/mid-capitalisation and the preponderance of them are located in the US. This is also partially true of some other sub-sectors, such as managed care and life science tools companies. It follows, then, that contribution follows this distribution, at least directionally.
A key investment strategy for the Company is to seek out innovation. The healthcare industry is the midst of a golden era of innovation that is generating a metamorphosis of how medicines are created, how physicians practice, and how patients are treated. The largest contributors to performance for the financial year are very emblematic of that mantra. Perhaps more interesting, each of the companies below represent a different sub-sector: diagnostics, specialty pharmaceuticals, emerging biotechnology, large biotechnology, and emerging markets.
Natera is a diagnostics company that is an industry leader in non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and other genetic testing. NIPT is a simple blood draw that allows pregnant mothers to discover any fetal genetic disorders or conditions early on during gestation. Natera's share price posted strong performance over the year as the company's core NIPT business demonstrated continued strong volume growth and received expanded clinical guidance. In August 2020, the American College of Obstetricians
Contribution to Performance by Geography and Gynecologists (ACOG) issued a new set of guidelines, recommending that prenatal screenings be offered to all pregnant women regardless of age or risk factors. This guidance expanded upon ACOG's prior guidance that recommended NIPT screening to only pregnant women ages 35 and older, or those with known risk factors. Additionally, the company has received numerous positive clinical and regulatory updates for use of their other proprietary diagnostic blood test, "Signatera". Signatera is used in cancer patients that have undergone surgery. This diagnostic test predicts likelihood of recurrence or not, thereby informing next treatment options for both doctor and patient. The test is also effective to detect minimal residual disease (MRD) in multiple indications, including colorectal cancer and immunotherapy response monitoring. The company's first mover advantage in this massive market has resulted in strong performance for the year.
Horizon Therapeutics a specialty pharmaceutical company focused on rare diseases, was the Company's second highest contributor during the financial year, after the stock more than tripled. This share price momentum was driven by the phenomenal uptake of Tepezza (teprotumumab), the first and only FDA approved medicine for the treatment of thyroid eye disease (TED), a rare, debilitating, visionthreatening condition characterised by inflammation and tissue expansion behind the eye. Tepezza, which was launched in January 2020, quickly became the treatment of choice for active, moderate-to-severe TED. As a result, the product achieved near blockbuster status in only its first full year on the market. This represents one of the best first year drug launches in pharmaceutical history. Horizon management also raised peak sales guidance from U.S.\$1 billion to over U.S.\$3 billion. We expect Tepezza to become a mega-blockbuster product.
Alexion Pharmaceuticals is a large-capitalisation
biotechnology company whose lead franchise consists of complement inhibitors for a variety of orphan haematological and neurological indications. Despite demonstrating consistent earnings growth, the company's stock had traded sideways at "value" prices for the past few years. Investor concerns centred on upcoming biosimilar and branded competition to the company's lead products, Soliris (eculizumab) and Ultomiris (ravulizumab). These medicines target a disease called paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH), a chronic, progressive, debilitating, and life-threatening ultra-rare blood disorder characterized by complementmediated hemolysis (destruction of red blood cells). PNH can strike men and women of all races, backgrounds, and ages without warning, with an average age of onset in the early 30s. The company executed a number of business development transactions to diversify their business, but they were not well-received by the market. As long-term investors in the company, we disagreed. Our patience was rewarded in December 2020 when AstraZeneca announced it was acquiring Alexion for U.S.\$39 billion with a combination of cash and stock, representing an impressive 45% premium to Alexion's share price.
Mirati is a San Diego based biotechnology company developing next generation targeted therapies for various forms of cancer. Their lead program targets the "KRAS" gene which acts as an on/off switch for cell growth. When functioning normally, it regulates cellular growth, however when mutated, cells grow and spread out of control. These cells often develop into some of the deadliest cancers. The stock re-rated higher in the financial year after the company disclosed additional data on their lead candidate, adagrasib, advanced it in clinical development, and a competitor published target-validating data for KRAS. We believe Mirati will be one of the first companies to tap into this significant market with high unmet medical need.
Burning Rock Biotech is the industry leader in providing individualized cancer treatment guidance for the patients through genomics based molecular diagnostics. The company provides testing services both at its central lab and through collaborations with hospitals. Given our bullish view, we participated in the company's U.S. IPO in June 2020. The share price of the company surged on the first trading day given strong demand for the stock, emblematic of investors' confidence in the company's leadership in China. The stock was volatile after management provided conservative guidance on earnings visibility, due to pandemic related uncertainty. However, the share price eventually rebounded over the second half of the financial year with the advent of a fast recovery of it's testing business in China.
With overall performance strong for the financial year, notable positive contributors far outnumbered negative detractors in the period. The ratio of individual positions that returned over +100 basis points versus detracting over -100 basis points was 7:1, respectively. Lowering the bar to ±75 basis points and that ratio moves to 14:1. With that said, we detail the 5 largest detractors to performance for the financial year below.
With pandemic-induced lockdowns increasing public demand for all things digital, healthcare services were no exception. eHealth, an insurance broker that specialises in enrolling individuals in Medicare Advantage insurance, is one of the market leaders in a robust market trend from in-person broker assistance to sophisticated telephonic and digital enrolment. Exuberance for their services was evident in the share price gains early in the financial year. However, the company reported higher than expected levels of plan "churn" in their second quarter report in July 2020. The market reacted negatively to this news and the share price gapped down, as churn is a key input to the lifetime value metric which eHealth uses to book revenues for insurance plan sales. Further, the company's fourth quarter results fell below expectations, pressuring the share price further. Whilst the company has since identified various areas of operational improvement, the outlook remains cloudy and a full recovery will be lengthy.
Headquartered in Boston, Vertex Pharmaceuticals is a large biotechnology company focused on the treatment of rare, life-threatening diseases. The hallmark of the company is certainly one of innovation as the company has revolutionized the treatment of cystic fibrosis with the launch of new products that, for the first time, treat the underlying cause of this devastating disease. However, a constant risk in the pursuit of new and novel medicines is failure. Whilst the stock re-rated higher in late 2019 and early 2020, shares of Vertex gapped lower in October 2020 following the discontinuation of a key pipeline product (VX-814) in development for the treatment of a rare but serious pulmonary disease called alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. Following this high-profile pipeline failure, investors have grown concerned over Vertex's commercial concentration in cystic fibrosis and perceived lack of later-stage clinical prospects to drive future growth. Despite these concerns, we note Vertex's cystic fibrosis portfolio continues to grow commercially, and the company's mid-stage pipeline remains robust and diversified across several therapeutic areas.
VERTEX: Leader in Pulmonary Disorders
Another unmistakable leader in innovation is Biogen. The Cambridge, Massachusetts large capitalisation biotechnology company is focused on neuroscience, with key franchises in multiple sclerosis and spinal muscular atrophy (a genetic disorder characterised by atrophy of skeletal muscles). Unfortunately, the company lost two key patent cases this past year for their lead product for the treatment of multiple sclerosis, Tecfidera (dimethyl fumarate), allowing generics to enter the market and removing upside to consensus estimates. Despite the setback, Biogen's innovation engine has created a new potential growth driver in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Aducanumab is the company's experimental – yet controversial – antibody for this debilitating disease. Despite a mixed Phase 3 dataset, aducanumab received a glowing positive review by FDA officials in a briefing document released prior to an external advisory committee meeting in November 2020. However, the committee overwhelmingly voted against approval just days later. The FDA has since delayed the approval action date for aducanumab to June 2021. Continued uncertainty about the likelihood of approval caused the share price to languish.
A core strategy for the Company is to seek the best of the blue-chip healthcare companies in emerging markets, such as China. Shenzen Hepalink Pharmaceutical is a leading pharmaceuticals manufacturer. The company started as an active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) supplier of heparin to the global market and became the world's largest supplier of heparin with over 40% revenue share by 2018. The company went on to expand its offerings with additional products and geographies, including Europe. We participated in the company's dual listing on the Hong Kong stock exchange in July 2020. Despite positive news flow for its U.S. operations, including API approval by the FDA, the share price has been weak due to; (1) sector weakness for China healthcare in the autumn of 2020, (2) slow business recovery in the U.S., and (3) currency headwinds against Hepalink's dollar denominated revenue.
Another China-based blue-chip company and innovation leader is Shanghai Kindly Medical Instruments, a leading cardiovascular interventional device manufacture with a diversified product portfolio. They are leaders in support devices for percutaneous coronary intervention such as inflation device, introducer set, and angiography guidewires. The company ranks either first or second across multiple cardiovascular intervention segments but, are also players in orthopedic and neuro-intervention medical device products. We participated in Kindly's IPO in 2019 as a cornerstone investor. Unfortunately, share price performance was weak in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic when outpatient visits and elective surgeries were postponed or cancelled, which affected the sales of interventional devices.
During the financial year ended 31 March 2021, the Company took advantage of a favourable market in crossover investments (or "unquoteds"). As of 31 March 2021, investments in unquoted companies (excluding debt) accounted for 5.3% of the Company's net assets versus only 1.0% as of 31 March 2020.
The investments were split among sub-industries with a focus on emerging biotechnology and healthcare services companies in addition to investments in medical devices and life sciences tools. From a geographic perspective, the investment opportunities were focused on Emerging Markets and North America with a single investment coming out of Europe. Three of our unquoted companies completed an initial public offering ("IPO") during the year, including two investments which were initiated during the financial year.
Much like the crossover market, trends were also very favourable for IPOs, including Cornerstone Investments in Hong Kong, and the Company found many opportunities for sizeable allocations during the year.
For the year ended 31 March 2021, unquoteds contributed gains of £70.4m (including both realised and unrealised gains) while investments in IPOs contributed gains of £91.5m. The total gains of £161.9m across both unquoted companies and IPOs represented a return of approximately 31%.
The Company employs leverage with a maximum level of 20%. Historically, the typical leverage level employed by the Company is mid-to-high teens. Considering the market volatility during the past financial year, we used leverage in a more tactical fashion during the period. For example, after the dramatic "V"-shape market recovery of April 2020, leverage was significantly reduced by over 1000 basis points month-over-month, to 3% and ultimately 1% in May 2020. This low level of leverage was maintained for a period of months but was once again increased ahead of and into the U.S. Presidential election in November 2020. Post-election and into the new calendar year, it was again notably decreased through January 2021. However, given the sell-off in small-capitalisation biotechnology stocks in February and March 2021, leverage was once again increased through additional exposure to biotechnology, medical devices, and a reduction of our underweight exposure to large cap pharmaceuticals. We expect to continue a more aggressive and tactical approach to leverage in 2021.
WORLDWIDE HEALTHCARE TRUST PLC Annual Report for the year ended 31 March 2021 / 21
The Company has the ability to use equity swaps and options, as set out in the Investment Objective and Policy on page 8. During the current financial year the Company employed single stock equity swaps to gain exposure to emerging market Chinese and Indian stocks. The exposure via swaps averaged 4.5% on a gross basis and contributed 1.6% to the Company's return. Analysis of the Company's investments in emerging markets is included on page 25.
Further details on the use of swaps can be found in Note 16 starting on pages 89 and in the Glossary on page 97.
The key healthcare investment theme that the Company has espoused has been centred on innovation. Innovation across new technologies, novel platforms, and therapeutic categories that have fostered increased drug discovery, development, and approval of new groundbreaking medicines around the globe with many of them now delivering cures. The COVID-19 pandemic has shone a spotlight like none other on the industry's ability to innovate, with the rapid advancement of life saving therapies and vaccines all discovered, developed, and approved under 12 months. Incredible, indeed.
However, our main focus is not on COVID-19 per se, rather, it is on the totality of innovation across the healthcare sector. Our investment focus is on what the industry is doing for cardiovascular disease, oncology, neurology, immunology, and metabolic disease, just to name a few. INNOVATION: "Golden Era" Continues
Perhaps a "scorecard" of such innovation can be found in new product approvals. The FDA has an unprecedented four-year period of productivity. In 2018, the agency set a record with 59 approvals of new molecular entities and followed it up with two years of new record approvals, resulting in 200 novel approvals during the past four years. Despite some recent regulatory uncertainty and delays, we expect the appointment of a new FDA commissioner under the Biden administration, as well as the tapering off of the bolus of COVID-19-related reviews, to help normalize operations within the agency. We expect the FDA to continue to support drug developers and believe the regulatory environment should remain largely positive.
U.S. FDA: Novel Drug Approvals since 2000
00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Traditionally, the broad pharmaceutical industry is divided amongst three sub-sectors: large pharma, specialty pharma, and generic pharma. Specialty pharmaceuticals are a heterogenous group of companies that typically focus one or two therapeutic categories and have shown to be cradles of innovation within the sector. The Company will continue to scour this universe for alpha generating ideas, with a bias to be overweight this subsector. Generic pharmaceuticals, of course, are companies that produce commodity medicines that no longer have patent protection. Whilst there are points of differentiation between many of these companies, including hybrid models of generics and brands, the generic industry continues to be out of favour due to significant structural headwinds and pricing pressure across global markets. We do note, however, that these two segments combined represent less than 5% of the Benchmark.
Large pharmaceuticals, conversely, represent approximately 35% of the Benchmark. This segment, too, is a heterogeneous group of companies with varying positives and negatives across various metrics, including: quality of management teams, ability to innovate, product portfolios, new product opportunities, pipeline prospects, and patent exposure. This is a complex sector, subsequently, generalist investors are often loathe to fully participate. Overall growth outlook for the group is mostly modest, although there is a notable spread. Operationally, the companies have been mostly resilient to pandemic headwinds, although some companies with more physician administered medicines have suffered. Obviously, the spectre of healthcare and drug price reform hangs over this group, seemingly forever. Whilst we do not think that the Biden administration will enact any egregious, industryaltering legislation, valuations seem to suggest otherwise, with this group trading at trough levels compared to the S&P 500 multiple. Overall, we remain highly selective – and underweight – large cap pharmaceutical stocks into 2021, preferring to focus only on our best investment ideas, rather than taking a pan-pharmaceutical strategy.
The Company's financial year was a banner year for biotechnology stocks. The NASDAQ Biotechnology Index returned to record highs in calendar 2020, matching a level last seen in 2015. Following an unprecedented year of drug discovery and development, we expect biotechnology to continue its strong cycle of innovation, with several new and emerging treatment modalities reaching the clinic and the market. In addition to strong underlying fundamentals, we see several tailwinds for the sector. Calendar 2019 was a record year for biotechnology M&A and was eclipsed in calendar 2020 (source: Bio.org). With biotechnology valuations reset in recent months after record highs in 2020, we expect M&A activity could accelerate again in calendar 2021 which could drive further interest in the sector.
From a large capitalisation biotechnology perspective, we have grown more dubious of the growth prospects of these companies. In fact, the metamorphosis of the large cap biotech companies into large cap pharma companies – and their growth challenges due to their size and their ability to innovate because of their complexity – is almost fully complete. For the first time in Company history, the portfolio does not contain any large cap biotech names as of the end of the financial year.
After a tumultuous 2020, the Medical Device sector is emerging as one of the few "recovery trade" sectors within healthcare. Elective procedure volumes have lagged since the outbreak of COVID-19, and whilst this has represented a headwind for the sector over the past 12 months, the bolus of pent up demand for procedures is now poised to become a tailwind. As COVID-19 vaccine rollouts continue globally, mostly notably in the U.S., elective procedure volumes are clearly benefiting. It is unlikely that these procedures will all be recaptured in 2021 given hospital capacity constraints, especially in the U.S., but this dynamic could present a multi-year boost for the industry.
In addition to an improving fundamental outlook, medical device companies are also insulated from drug price reform rhetoric, which should provide equity valuation support going forward. Against this backdrop, we have increased our overall exposure to the Medical Device industry and are most focused on companies that both benefit from improving industry tailwinds and are accelerating innovation in key markets. Examples of key innovation include rapidly expanding markets for robotic surgery, advances in non-invasive glucose monitoring, next-generation heart valve replacement products, and implantable stroke prevention devices.
Over the past two years, managed care companies have faced a treacherous environment. Political fears over "Medicare For All" and other legislative disruptions was a clear overhang for the group. More recently, investors were concerned about outsized COVID-19 related costs, including treatment, testing, and vaccinations. Finally, there are fears of a wave of pent-up healthcare demand.
However, the outlook for healthcare services is quite robust moving into 2021 and beyond. The election of President Biden but with only a razor-thin majority in Congress, these multi-year political overhangs have nearly completely subsided. The U.S. federal government's healthcare priorities have focused on expanding the Affordable Care Act in uncontroversial ways. Managed care companies have also been careful to call out any negative COVID-19 items as one-time impacts to 2021 results that will not recur afterwards. They have also created historically high levels of cushion to earnings via conservative reserves and accelerated investment spending. After the final piece
of the "wall of worry" crumbles and pent-up healthcare demand is depleted, we believe that managed care is very favourably positioned for both earnings revisions and multiple expansion.
In the near term, the outlook for providers is positive, albeit with high expectations, as this pent-up demand returns – the shape, peak, and duration of this demand curve will be key to monitor. We are also positive on several emerging trends in the industry, including a shift to value-based care providers who can better manage care and reduce cost.
The past year has been truly transformational for tools and diagnostics companies, with several key investible themes presenting themselves throughout the pandemic, supporting outperformance for the group. The industry has been able to contribute on several COVID-related fronts, including infectious disease diagnostics, vaccine, and therapeutic manufacturing. The most prevalent of these was the contribution on supporting testing infrastructure, with many larger diversified and more pure-play diagnostics manufacturers benefiting from the significant uptick in the global infectious disease market fuelled by COVID-19. Investor focus has increased on companies that have the ability to capitalise not only on testing tailwinds, but also in selling key bioprocess inputs for COVID-19 vaccines and therapeutics. Furthermore, we have taken the opportunity to increase our exposure to emerging secular winners in liquid biopsy and genomics that are quickly coming of age in a post-pandemic world.
With a generally solid fundamental backdrop for the industry, we have approached our portfolio construction by maintaining selective exposure in diversified companies who benefit from all aspects of the COVID-related environment alluded to above like Thermo Fisher, while increasing our exposure to emerging secular winners in more nascent markets. One such secular theme is advanced oncology diagnostics and liquid biopsy, with significant capital deployed towards leaders in this budding field such as Natera and Guardant Health. As leaders in this space are likely to reshape the oncology diagnostics industry, we also had the ability to invest in a crossover round for another emerging industry leader, Caris Life Sciences. Lastly, we remain positive on genomics, expressed through our position in NanoString Technologies, a leader in spatial genomics which has the potential to reshape many traditional research and clinical workflows.
We are generally bullish on emerging markets from a healthcare perspective, especially in China, due to the ongoing rapid recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic. Also, in China, like in other parts of the global healthcare industry, we are witnessing accelerating growth of the industry driven by a new wave of domestic innovation. As divergence between innovation-driven pharma/biotech companies and generic/traditional Chinese medicines businesses increases, we have pivoted our investment approach to the former.
Looking forward, in addition to macro tailwinds such as aging demographics, government policies continue to drive industry evolution by allocating resources to innovation via centralised bidding and drug price list negotiations. We believe companies with truly innovative technology and differentiated products will stand out as winners in this market. These phenomena have led to our two-pronged approach to investing in China. First, to identify and select the best blue-chip leaders across various healthcare sub-sectors to capitalise on this growth. Second, to take advantage of the relaxed listing rules for new securities and IPOs to invest in the next wave of young and innovative biotechnology companies coming out of China.
Sven H. Borho and Trevor M. Polischuk OrbiMed Capital LLC Portfolio Manager 3 June 2021
Principal contributors to and detractors from net asset value performance
| Top five contributors | Contribution £'000 |
Contribution per share* £ |
|---|---|---|
| Natera | 59,847 | 1.01 |
| Horizon Therapeutics | 56,436 | 0.95 |
| Alexion Pharmaceutical** | 48,341 | 0.81 |
| Mirati Therapeutics | 40,625 | 0.68 |
| Burning Rock Biotech | 23,523 | 0.40 |
| Top five detractors | ||
| Shanghai Kindly Medical Instruments | -7,657 | -0.13 |
|---|---|---|
| Shenzhen Hepalink Pharmaceutical | -9,583 | -0.16 |
| Biogen** | -10,770 | -0.18 |
| Vertex Pharmaceuticals | -11,798 | -0.20 |
| eHealth** | -23,413 | -0.39 |
* Calculation based on 59,487,545 shares being the weighted average number of shares in issue during the year ended 31 March 2021.
** Not held at 31 March 2021.
The Strategic Report, on pages 1 to 40, contains a review of the Company's business model and strategy, an analysis of its performance during the financial year and its future developments and details of the principal risks and challenges it faces.
Its purpose is to inform shareholders in the Company and help them to assess how the Directors have performed their duty to promote the success of the Company. Further information on how the Directors have discharged their duty under s172 of the Companies Act 2006 in promoting the success of the Company for the benefit of the investors as a whole, and how they have taken wider stakeholders' needs into account can be found on pages 35 to 39. The Strategic Report contains certain forward-looking statements. These statements are made by the Directors in good faith based on the information available to them up to the date of this report. Such statements should be treated with caution due to the inherent uncertainties, including both economic and business risk factors, underlying such forward-looking information.
Worldwide Healthcare Trust PLC is an externally managed investment trust and its shares are listed on the premium segment of the Official List and traded on the main market of the London Stock Exchange. Its investment objective is set out on pages 7 and 8.
As an externally managed investment trust, all of the Company's day-to-day managements and administrative functions are outsourced to service providers. As a result, the Company has no executive directors, employees or internal operations. The Company employs Frostrow Capital LLP (Frostrow) as its Alternative Investment Fund Manager (AIFM), OrbiMed Capital LLC (OrbiMed) as its Portfolio Manager, J.P. Morgan Europe Limited as its Depositary and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC as its Custodian and Prime Broker. Further details about their appointments can be found in the Business Review on pages 28 and 29. The Board has determined an investment policy and related guidelines and limits, as described below.
The Company is an investment company within the meaning of Section 833 of the Companies Act 2006 and has been
approved by HM Revenue & Customs as an investment trust (for the purposes of Section 1158 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010). As a result the Company is not liable for taxation on capital gains. The Directors have no reason to believe that approval will not continue to be retained. The Company is not a close company for taxation purposes.
The Board is responsible for all aspects of the Company's affairs, including the setting of parameters for and the monitoring of the investment strategy a s well as the review of investment performance and policy. It also has responsibility for all strategic issues, the dividend policy, the share issuance and buy-back policy, gearing, share price and discount/premium monitoring and corporate governance matters.
A resolution was passed at the Annual General Meeting held in 2019 that the Company continues as an investment trust for a further five year period. In accordance with the Company's Articles of Association, shareholders will have an opportunity to vote on the continuation of the Company at the Annual General Meeting to be held in 2024 and every five years thereafter.
The Board of the Company comprises Sir Martin Smith (Chairman), Sarah Bates, Sven Borho, Dr David Holbrook, Doug McCutcheon, Dr Bina Rawal and Humphrey van der Klugt. All of these Directors, served throughout the year. All are independent non-executive Directors with the exception of Mr Borho who is not considered to be independent by the Board.
Further information on the Directors can be found on pages 41 to 43.
All Directors, with the exception of Dr. Holbrook, are seeking re-election by shareholders at this year's Annual General Meeting.
It is the Company's policy to pay out dividends to shareholders at least to the extent required to maintain investment trust status for each financial year. Such dividends will typically be paid twice a year by means of an interim dividend and a final dividend.
The Board assesses the Company's performance in meeting its objectives against key performance indicators as follows. The Key Performance Indicators have not changed from the previous year:
Information on the Company's performance is provided in the Chairman's Statement and the Portfolio Manager's Review and a record of these measures is shown on pages 1, 2 and 3. Further information can be found in the Glossary beginning on page 97.
The Directors regard the Company's NAV per share total return as being the overall measure of value delivered to shareholders over the long term. This reflects both net asset value growth of the Company and dividends paid to shareholders.
The Board considers the most important comparator, against which to assess the NAV per share total return performance, to be the MSCI World Health Care Index measured on a net total return, sterling adjusted basis (the 'Benchmark'). As noted on pages 7 and 8, OrbiMed has flexibility in managing the investments and are not limited by the make up of the Benchmark. As a result, investment decisions are made that differentiate the Company from the Benchmark and therefore the Company's performance may also be different to that of the Benchmark.
A full description of performance during the year under review is contained in the Portfolio Manager's Review beginning on page 13 of this Annual Report.
The share price discount/premium to NAV per share is considered a key indicator of performance as it impacts the share price total return of shareholders and can provide an indication of how investors view the Company's performance and its Investment Objective.
The Board continues to be conscious of expenses and works hard to maintain a balance between good quality service and costs.
* Alternative Performance Measure (See Glossary beginning on page 97)
The principal service providers to the Company are the AIFM, Frostrow Capital LLP (Frostrow), the Portfolio Manager, OrbiMed Capital LLC (OrbiMed), the Custodian and Prime Broker J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, and the Depositary, J.P. Morgan Europe Limited. Details of their key responsibilities follow and further information on their contractual arrangements with the Company are included in the Report of the Directors beginning on page 44.
Frostrow under the terms of its AIFM agreement with the Company provides, inter alia, the following services:
During the year, under the terms of the AIFM Agreement, Frostrow received a fee as follows:
On market capitalisation up to £150 million: 0.3%; in the range £150 million to £500 million: 0.2%; in the range £500 million to £1 billion: 0.15%; in the range £1 billion to £1.5 billion: 0.125%; over £1.5 billion: 0.075%. In addition, Frostrow receives a fixed fee per annum of £57,500.
OrbiMed under the terms of its portfolio management agreement with the AIFM and the Company provides, inter alia, the following services:
OrbiMed receives a base fee of 0.65% of NAV and a performance fee of 15% of outperformance against the Benchmark as detailed on page 44.
J.P. Morgan Europe Limited acts as the Company's Depositary and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC as its Custodian and Prime Broker.
J.P. Morgan Europe Limited, as Depositary, must take reasonable care to ensure that the Company is managed in accordance with the Financial Conduct Authority's Investment Funds Sourcebook, the AIFMD and the Company's Articles of Association. The Depositary must in the context of this role act honestly, fairly, professionally, independently and in the interests of the Company and its shareholders.
The Depositary receives a variable fee based on the size of the Company as set out on pages 44 and 45.
J.P. Morgan Europe Limited has discharged certain of its liabilities as Depositary to J.P. Morgan Securities LLC. Further details of this arrangement are set out on pages 44 and 45. J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, as Custodian and Prime Broker, provides the following services under its agreement with the Company:
The performance of the AIFM and the Portfolio Manager is reviewed continuously by the Board and the Management Engagement & Remuneration Committee (the "Committee") with a formal evaluation being undertaken each year. As part of this process, the Committee monitors the services provided by the AIFM and the Portfolio Manager and receives regular reports and views from them. The Committee also receives comprehensive performance measurement reports to enable it to determine whether or not the performance objectives set by the Board have been met. The Committee reviewed the appropriateness of the appointment of the AIFM and the Portfolio Manager in February 2021 with a positive recommendation being made to the Board.
The Board believes the continuing appointment of the AIFM and the Portfolio Manager, under the terms described on pages 28 and 29, is in the interests of shareholders as a whole. In coming to this decision, it took into consideration, inter alia, the following:
The Board is responsible for the management of risks faced by the Company. Through delegation to the Audit Committee, the Board has established procedures to manage risk, to review the Company's internal control framework and establish the level and nature of the principal risks the Company is prepared to accept in order to achieve its long-term strategic objective. At least twice a year the Audit Committee carries out a robust assessment of the principal risks and uncertainties with the assistance of Frostrow Capital (the Company's AIFM) identifying the principal risks faced by the Company. These principal risks and the ways they are managed or mitigated are detailed on the following pages.
• foreign exchange services.
By the nature of its activities and Investment Objective, the Company's portfolio is exposed to fluctuations in market prices (from both individual security prices and foreign exchange rates) and due to exposure to the global healthcare sector, it is expected to have higher volatility than the wider market. As such investors should be aware that by investing in the Company they are exposing themselves to market risks and those additional risks specific to the sectors in which the Company invests, such as political interference in drug pricing. Another factor is climate change which may affect the operating models of the Company's investments in the coming years. In addition, the Company uses leverage (both through derivatives and gearing) the effect of which is to amplify the gains or losses the Company experiences.
To manage these risks the Board and the AIFM have appointed OrbiMed to manage the investment portfolio within the remit of the investment objective and policy, and imposed various limits and guidelines, set out on pages 7 and 8. These limits ensure that the portfolio is diversified, reducing the risks associated with individual stocks, and that the maximum exposure (through derivatives and an overdraft facility) is limited. The compliance with those limits and guidelines is monitored daily by Frostrow and OrbiMed and reported to the Board monthly.
In addition, OrbiMed reports at each Board meeting on the performance of the Company's portfolio, which encompasses the rationale for stock selection decisions, the make-up of the portfolio, potential new holdings and, derivative activity and strategy (further details on derivatives can be found in note 16 beginning on page 89).
The Company does not currently hedge its currency exposure.
Macro events may have an adverse impact on the Company's performance by causing exchange rate volatility, changes in tax or regulatory environments, and/or a fall in market prices. Emerging markets, which a portion of the portfolio is exposed to, can be subject to greater political uncertainty and price volatility than developed markets.
While such events are outside the control of the Company the Board reviews regularly, and discusses with the Portfolio Manager, the wider economic and political environment, along with the portfolio exposure and the execution of
the investment policy against the long-term objectives of the Company. The Portfolio Manager's risk team perform systematic risk analysis, including country and industry specific risk monitoring.
The Company's risk could be increased by its investment in unquoted companies. These investments may be more difficult to buy, sell or value, so changes in their valuations may be greater than for listed assets. The valuation of unquoted investments requires considerable judgement as explained in Note1(a) and as such realisations may be materially lower than the value as estimated by the Company. Particular events, outside the control of the Company, may also have a significant impact on the valuation and considerable uncertainty may exist around the potential future outcomes for each investment.
To mitigate this risk the Board and AIFM have set a limit of 10% of the portfolio, calculated at the time of investment, that can be held in unquoted investments and have established a robust and consistent valuation policy and process as set out in Note 1(b), which is in line with UK GAAP requirements and the International Private Equity and Venture Capital (IPEV) Guidelines. The Board also monitors the performance of these investments compared to the additional risks involved.
There is a risk that the individuals responsible for managing the Company's portfolio may leave their employment or may be prevented from undertaking their duties.
The Board manage this risk by:
including, inter alia, the team supporting the lead managers and succession planning.
In addition to market and foreign currency risks, discussed above, the Company is exposed to risk arising from the use of counterparties. If a counterparty were to fail, the Company could be adversely affected through either delay in settlement or loss of assets.
The most significant counterparty the Company is exposed to is J.P. Morgan Securities LLC which is responsible for the safekeeping of the Company's assets and provides the overdraft facility to the Company. As part of the arrangements with J.P. Morgan Securities LLC they may take assets, up to 140% of the value of the drawn overdraft, as collateral and have first priority security interest or lien over all of the Company's assets. Such assets taken as collateral may be used, loaned, sold, rehypothecated or transferred by J.P. Morgan Securities LLC. Although the Company maintains the economic benefit from the ownership of those assets it does not hold any of the rights associated with those assets. Any of the Company's assets taken as collateral are not covered by the custody arrangements provided by J.P. Morgan Securities LLC. The Company is, however, afforded protection in accordance with SEC rules and U.S. legislation equal to the value of the assets that have been rehypothecated.
This risk is managed by the Board through:
monitoring of counterparties, including reviews of internal control reports and credit ratings, as appropriate;
by primarily investing in markets that operate DVP (Delivery Versus Payment) settlement. The process of DVP mitigates the risk of losing the principal of a trade during the settlement process; and
The Board is reliant on the systems of the Company's service providers and as such disruption to, or a failure of, those systems could lead to a failure to comply with law and regulations leading to reputational damage and/or financial loss to the Company.
The spread of an infectious disease, such as has been seen as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, may again force governments to introduce rules to restrict meetings and movements of people and take other measures to prevent its spread, which may cause disruption to the Company's operations.
To manage these risks the Board:
Both the Board and the Portfolio Manager recognise the importance of having a coherent ESG policy. There is a risk that investing in companies that disregard ESG factors will have a negative impact on investment returns and also that the Company itself may become unattractive to investors if ESG is not appropriately considered in the Portfolio Manager's decision making process. In light of this, the Board has asked OrbiMed to provide ESG updates at each Board meeting, highlighting examples where ESG issues influenced investment decisions and/or led to engagement with an investee company.
The Board ensures that the Portfolio Manager's ESG approach is in line with standards elsewhere and the Board's expectations. A summary of the Portfolio Manager's approach to Responsible Investing can be found on page 34.
The Company is also exposed to the risk, particularly if the investment strategy and approach are unsuccessful, that the Company may underperform resulting in the Company becoming unattractive to investors and a widening of the share price discount to NAV per share. Also, falls in stock markets, such as those experienced as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the risk of a global recession, are likely to adversely affect the performance of the Company's investments.
In managing this risk the Board:
The operation of the discount/premium control mechanism and Company promotional activities have been delegated to Frostrow, who report to the Board at each Board meeting on these activities.
The Company has carried out a robust assessment of the Company's emerging and principal risks and the procedures in place to identify emerging risks are described below. The International Risk Governance Council definition of an 'emerging' risk is one that is new, or is a familiar risk in a new or unfamiliar context or under new context conditions (re-emerging). Failure to identify emerging risks may cause reactive actions rather than being proactive and, in worst case, could cause the Company to become unviable or otherwise fail or force the Company to change its structure, objective or strategy.
The Audit Committee reviews a risk map at its half-yearly meetings. Emerging risks are discussed in detail as part of this process and also throughout the year to try to ensure that emerging (as well as known) risks are identified and, so far as practicable, mitigated.
The Board recognises that the emergence and spread of the new coronavirus (COVID-19) strains represents a new area of continuing risk, both to the Company's investments, investment performance and to its operations. In recent months the Portfolio Manager successfully has continued its dialogue with investee companies and the Board has stayed in close contact with both the AIFM and the Portfolio Manager and has been regularly monitoring portfolio and share price developments. The Board has also received assurances from all of the Company's service providers in respect of:
With the emergence of several vaccines, the outlook is cautiously positive, but the Board will continue to monitor developments as they occur.
The Board has considered whether the UK's exit from the European Union ("Brexit") posed a discrete risk to the Company. At the date of this report, the UK has left the EU and has emerged from the transition period with a trade and security deal finalised with the EU on 24 December 2020. The long-term impact and implications of this remain to be seen.
As the Company's shares are priced in sterling and its portfolio companies are priced in foreign currencies, sharp movements in exchange rates can affect the net asset value (see page 91 for the foreign currency sensitivity analysis). This is not a reflection of the underlying value of the companies in their base currencies but may lead to an increase or decrease in the Company's net asset value simply because of currency movements.
Furthermore, whilst the Company's current shareholders are predominantly UK based holders, sharp or unexpected changes in investor sentiment, or tax or regulatory changes, could lead to short term selling pressure on the Company's shares which potentially could lead to the share price discount widening. Overall, however, the Board believes that over the longer term, Brexit is unlikely to materially affect the Company's business model or whether the shares trade at a premium or discount to the net asset value per share. The Board will continue to monitor developments as they occur.
The Company has appointed Frostrow to provide marketing and investor relations services, in the belief that a wellmarketed investment company is more likely to grow over time, have a more diverse and stable shareholder register and will trade at a superior rating to its peers.
Frostrow actively promotes the Company in the following ways:
Engaging regularly with institutional investors, discretionary wealth managers and a range of executiononly platforms: Frostrow regularly talks and meets with institutional investors, discretionary wealth managers and execution-only platform providers to discuss the Company's strategy and to understand any issues and concerns, covering both investment and corporate governance matters. Such meetings have been conducted on a virtual basis during the COVID-19 pandemic;
Making Company information more accessible: Frostrow works to raise the profile of the Company by targeting key groups within the investment community, holding annual investment seminars, overseeing PR output and managing the Company's website and wider digital offering, including Portfolio Manager videos and social media;
Disseminating key Company information: Frostrow performs the Investor Relations function on behalf of the Company and manages the investor database. Frostrow produces all key corporate documents, distributes monthly Fact Sheets, Annual Reports and updates from OrbiMed on portfolio and market developments; and
Monitoring market activity, acting as a link between the Company, shareholders and other stakeholders: Frostrow maintains regular contact with sector broker analysts and other research and data providers, and conducts periodic investor perception surveys, liaising with the Board to provide up-to-date and accurate information on the latest shareholder and market developments.
The Board undertakes a regular review of the level of discount/premium and consideration is given to ways in which share price performance may be enhanced, including the effectiveness of marketing, share issuance and share buy-backs, where appropriate.
The Board implemented the DCM in 2004. This established a target level of no more than a 6% share price discount to the ex-income NAV per share.
Under the DCM, when the discount reaches a level of 6% or more, the Company's shares may be bought back and held as treasury shares (See Glossary beginning on page 97).
Treasury shares can be sold back to the market at a later date at a premium to the cum income net asset value per share.
Shareholders should note, however, that it remains possible for the share price discount to the NAV per share to be greater than 6% on any one day. This is due to the fact that the share price continues to be influenced by overall supply and demand for the Company's shares in the secondary market. The volatility of the NAV per share in an asset class such as healthcare is another factor over which the Board has no control.
In recent years the Company's successful performance has generated substantial investor interest. Whenever there are unsatisfied buying orders for the Company's shares in the market, the Company has the ability to issue new shares at a small premium to the cum income NAV per share. This is an effective share price premium management tool.
Details of share issuance are set out on page 46. No shares were repurchased during the year and to the date of this report.
The Directors, through the Company's Portfolio Manager, encourage companies in which investments are made to adhere to best practice with regard to corporate governance. In light of the nature of the Company's business there are no relevant human rights issues and the Company does not have a human rights policy.
The Company recognises that social and environmental issues can have an effect on some of its investee companies.
The Company is an investment trust and so its own direct environmental impact is minimal. As an externallymanaged investment trust, the Company does not have any employees or maintain any premises, nor does it undertake any manufacturing or other physical operations itself. All its operational functions are outsourced to third party service providers. Therefore, the Company has no material, direct impact on the environment or any particular community and the Company itself has no environmental, human rights, social or community policies. The Board of Directors consists of seven Directors, five of whom are resident in the UK, one in Canada and one in the U.S.. The Board holds the majority of its regular meetings in the United Kingdom, with usually one meeting held each year in New York, and has a policy that travel, as far as possible, is minimal, thereby minimising the Company's greenhouse gas emissions. Further details concerning greenhouse gas emissions can be found within the Report of the Directors on page 47. During the Pandemic all of the Board and Committee meetings were held via video conference. Video conferencing has proved to be a very effective way of holding meetings.
The Portfolio Manager engages with the Company's underlying investee companies in relation to their corporate governance practices and the development of their policies on social, community and environmental matters. The Portfolio Manager's Responsible Investing Policy can be seen below.
The Company's Portfolio Manager, OrbiMed, believes that there is a high congruence between companies that seek to act responsibly and those that succeed in building long-term shareholder value. OrbiMed seeks to integrate its Responsible Investing Policy into its overall investment process for the Company in order to maximise investment returns.
A core part of OrbiMed's Responsible Investing Policy is to identify, and exclude from potential investment, business sectors which objectively lead to negative impacts on public health or well-being.
OrbiMed makes investment decisions based on a variety of financial and non-financial company factors, including environmental, social and governance (ESG) information. OrbiMed's due diligence process for prospective and existing investments takes into account financially material ESG factors, where relevant and applicable. ESG factors do not form the sole, or primary, set of considerations for an investment decision.
OrbiMed considers sector-specific guidance from the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board to determine material ESG factors. Depending on the investment, all or a subset of the ESG factors that are financially material and relevant are considered in OrbiMed's research. The evaluation of a company's performance on ESG issues provide guidance for investment decisions and constitute part of the investment analysis.
ESG is a rapidly evolving field. ESG evaluation is not standardised and faces limitations due to lack of availability of accurate, timely and uniform data. Presently, no known universally accepted standards for ESG incorporation in investment decisions exist. It must be acknowledged that ESG evaluation carries a significant degree of subjectivity.
The Board has carried out a robust assessment of the principal risks facing the Company including those that would threaten its business model, future performance, solvency or liquidity. The Board has drawn up a matrix of risks facing the Company and has put in place a schedule of investment limits and restrictions, appropriate to the Company's investment objective and policy, in order to mitigate these risks as far as practicable. The principal risks and uncertainties which have been identified, and
the steps taken by the Board to mitigate these as far as possible, are shown on pages 29 to 32.
The Board believes it is appropriate to assess the Company's viability over a five year period. This period is also deemed appropriate due to our Portfolio Manager's long-term investment horizon and also what it believes to be investors' horizons, taking account of the Company's current position and the potential impact of the principal risks and uncertainties as shown on pages 29 to 32. The Directors also took into account the liquidity of the portfolio and the expectation that the Company will pass the next continuation vote in 2024 when considering the viability of the Company over the next five years and its ability to meet liabilities as they fall due.
The Directors do not expect there to be any significant change in the principal risks that have been identified or the adequacy of the mitigating controls in place, and do not envisage any change in strategy or objectives or any events that would prevent the Company from continuing to operate over that period as the Company's assets are liquid, its commitments are limited and the Company intends to continue to operate as an investment trust.
Based on this assessment, the Directors have a reasonable expectation that the Company will be able to continue in operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due over the next five-year period.
The Directors are now required to explain more fully how they have discharged their duty under s172 of the Companies Act 2006 in promoting the success of the Company for the benefit of the members as a whole. This includes the likely consequences of the Directors' decisions in the long-term and how they have taken wider stakeholders' needs into account.
The Directors aim to act fairly between the Company's stakeholders. The Board's approach to shareholder relations is summarised in the Corporate Governance Report beginning on page 49. The Chairman's Statement beginning on page 4 provides an explanation of actions taken by the Directors during the year to achieve the Board's long-term aim of ensuring that the Company's shares trade at a price close to the NAV per share.
As an externally managed investment trust, the Company has no employees, customers, operations or premises. Therefore, the Company's key stakeholders (other than its shareholders) are considered to be its service providers. The need to foster business relationships with the service providers and maintain a reputation for high standards of business conduct are central to the Directors' decisionmaking as the Board of an externally managed investment trust. The Directors believe that fostering constructive and collaborative relationships with the Company's service providers will assist in their promotion of the success of the Company for the benefit of all shareholders.
The Board engages with representatives from its service providers throughout the year. Representatives from OrbiMed and Frostrow are in attendance at each Board meeting. As the Portfolio Manager and the AIFM respectively, the services they provide are fundamental to the longterm success and smooth running of the Company. The Chairman's Statement and the Business Review on pages 4 to 6 and also on page 29, describe relevant decisions taken during the year relating to OrbiMed and Frostrow. Further details about the matters discussed in Board meetings and the relationship between OrbiMed and the Board are set out in the Corporate Governance Report.
Representatives from other service providers are asked to attend Board meetings when deemed appropriate.
Further details are set out overleaf.
Why?
Investors Clear communication of the Company's strategy and the performance against the Company's objective can help the share price trade at a narrower discount or a premium to its net asset
value per share which benefits shareholders.
New shares can be issued to meet demand without net asset value per share dilution to existing shareholders. Increasing the size of the Company can benefit liquidity as well as spread costs.
Share buy backs are undertaken at the discretion of the Directors.
The Portfolio Manager and Frostrow, on behalf of the Board, complete a programme of investor relations throughout the year. Such meetings were conducted on a virtual basis during the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, the Chairman has been available to engage with the Company's larger shareholders where required.
An analysis of the Company's shareholder register is provided to the Directors at each Board meeting along with marketing reports from Frostrow. The Board reviews and considers the marketing plans on a regular basis. Reports from the Company's broker are submitted to the Board on investor sentiment and industry issues.
Key mechanisms of engagement include:
| What? | Outcomes and actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| WHAT WERE THE KEY AREAS OF ENGAGEMENT? | WHAT ACTIONS WERE TAKEN, INCLUDING MAIN DECISIONS? |
||
| Key areas of engagement with investors | |||
| • Ongoing dialogue with shareholders concerning the strategy of the Company, performance and the portfolio. |
• The Portfolio Manager and Frostrow meet regularly with shareholders and potential investors to discuss the Company's strategy, performance and portfolio. The Chairman meets with key shareholders from time to time and as required. |
||
| Frostrow and the Portfolio Manager engages with retail investors through a number of different channels: |
|||
| (i) The Company's website, which is maintained by Frostrow, contains articles, webinars and quarterly updates; |
|||
| (ii) A distribution list of shareholders (retail and professional) which is maintained by Frostrow and is used to communicate with investors on a regular basis; |
|||
| (iii) The Portfolio Manager provides annual presentations online – (webcasts) and offline (AGM), which shareholders are able to attend and participate in; and |
|||
| (iv) Frostrow ensures that the Company is available through a wide range of leading execution only platforms. |
| Who? | Why? | How? HOW THE BOARD, THE PORTFOLIO MANAGER |
|---|---|---|
| STAKEHOLDER GROUP |
THE BENEFITS OF ENGAGEMENT WITH THE COMPANY'S STAKEHOLDERS |
AND THE AIFM HAVE ENGAGED WITH THE COMPANY'S STAKEHOLDERS |
| Portfolio Manager | Engagement with the Company's Portfolio Manager is necessary to evaluate their performance against the Company's stated strategy and to understand any risks or opportunities this may present. The Board ensures that the Portfolio Manager's environmental, social and governance ("ESG") approach is in line with standards elsewhere and the Board's expectations. Engagement also helps ensure that the Portfolio Manager's fees are closely monitored and remain competitive. Gaining a deeper understanding of the portfolio companies and their strategies as well as incorporating consideration of ESG factors into the investment process assists in understanding and mitigating risks of an investment as well as identifying future potential opportunities. |
The Board meets regularly with the Company's Portfolio Manager throughout the year. In addition, during the pandemic extra meetings were held. The Board also receives monthly performance and compliance reporting. The Portfolio Manager's attendance at each Board meeting provides the opportunity for the Portfolio Manager and Board to further reinforce their mutual understanding of what is expected from both parties. The Board encourages the Company's Portfolio Manager to engage with companies and in doing so expects ESG issues to be an important consideration. The Board receives an update on Frostrow's engagement activities by way of a dedicated report at Board meetings and at other times during the year as required. |
| Service Providers | The Company contracts with third parties for other services including: custody, company secretarial, accounting & administration and registrar. The Company ensures that the third parties to whom the services have been outsourced complete their roles in line with their service level agreements thereby supporting the Company in its success and ensuring compliance with its obligations. The COVID-19 pandemic has meant that it was vital to make certain there were adequate procedures in place at the Company's principal service providers to ensure safety of their employees and the continued high quality service to the Company. |
The Board and Frostrow, acting in its capacity as AIFM,engage regularly with other service providers both in one-to-one meetings and via regular written reporting. This regular interaction provides an environment where topics, issues and business development needs can be dealt with efficiently and collegiately. The Board together with Frostrow have maintained regular contact with the Company's principal service providers during the pandemic, as well as carrying out a review of the service providers' business continuity plans and additional cyber security provisions. The review of the performance of the Portfolio Manager and Frostrow is a continuous process carried out by the Board and the Management Engagement Committee with a formal evaluation being undertaken annually. |
| What? WHAT WERE THE KEY AREAS OF ENGAGEMENT? |
Outcomes and actions WHAT ACTIONS WERE TAKEN, INCLUDING MAIN DECISIONS? |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| • • • |
Key areas of engagement with the Portfolio Manager on an ongoing basis are portfolio composition, performance, outlook and business updates. The impact of the pandemic upon their business and how components in the portfolio dealt with the pandemic. Regular review of the make up of the investment portfolio. The integration of ESG factors into the Portfolio Manager's investment processes. |
• • |
The Board has received regular updates from the Portfolio Manager throughout the pandemic and its impact on investment decision making. In addition, the impact of new working practices adopted by the Portfolio Manager as a consequence of the pandemic have been reviewed by the Board. The Portfolio Manager reports on ESG issues at each Board meeting. |
| • • |
Key areas of engagement with Service Providers The Directors have frequent engagement with the Company's other service providers through the annual cycle of reporting. This engagement is completed with the aim of maintaining an effective working relationship and oversight of the services provided. The Board sought and received assurances from all of the Company's service providers that steps had been taken to maintain the ongoing efficiency of their operations while ensuring the safety and well-being of their employees. |
• • |
No specific action required as the reviews of the Company's service providers, have been positive and the Directors believe their continued appointment is in the best interests of the Company. The Board agreed to continue to monitor the position closely. |
| • | Key areas of engagement with the broker The Board is cognisant that the trading of the Company's shares at a persistent and significant discount or premium to the prevailing NAV per share is not in the interests of shareholders. |
• | Throughout the year the Board closely monitored the Company's discount/premium to NAV per share and received regular updates from the broker. No shares were bought back during the year, or since the year end. 10,690,977 new shares were issued during the year and 752,000 shares issued following the year-end to 2 June |
for further information.)
The Company is committed to carrying out business in an honest and fair manner with a zero-tolerance approach to bribery, tax evasion and corruption. As such, policies and procedures are in place to prevent this. In carrying out its activities, the Company aims to conduct itself responsibly, ethically and fairly, including in relation to social and human rights issues.
The Company believes that high standards of ESG make good business sense and have the potential to protect and enhance investment returns. The Portfolio Manager's investment criteria provide that ESG and ethical issues are taken into account and best practice is encouraged by the Board. The Board's expectations are that its principal service providers have appropriate governance policies in place.
A review of the Company's year, its performance and the outlook for the Company can be found in the Chairman's Statement on pages 4 to 6 and in the Portfolio Manager's Review on pages 13 to 25.
The Company's overall strategy remains unchanged.
The Board concentrates its attention on the Company's investment performance and OrbiMed's investment approach and on factors that may have an effect on this approach. Marketing reports are given to the Board at each board meeting by the AIFM which include how the Company will be promoted and details of planned communications with existing and potential shareholders. The Board is regularly updated by the AIFM on wider investment trust industry issues and discussions are held at each Board meeting concerning the Company's future development and strategy.
A review of the Company's year, its performance since the year-end and the outlook for the Company can be found in the Chairman's Statement on pages 4 to 6 and in the Portfolio Manager's Review on pages 13 to 25. It is expected that the Company's Strategy will remain unchanged in the coming year.
The Financial Statements (on pages 74 to 95) set out the required statutory reporting measures of the Company's financial performance. In addition, the Board assesses the Company's performance against a range of criteria which are viewed as particularly relevant for investment trusts, which are explained in greater detail in the Strategic Report, under the heading 'Key Performance Indicators' on page 28.
By order of the Board
Company Secretary 3 June 2021
Joined the Board in 2007 and became Chairman in 2008
Remuneration £51,106pa*
11,871 (Beneficial) 2,725 (Trustee)
Sir Martin Smith has been involved in the financial services sector for more than 40 years. He was a founder and senior partner of Phoenix Securities, becoming Chairman of European Investment Banking for Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette (DLJ) following the acquisition of Phoenix by DLJ. He was subsequently a founder of New Star Asset Management Ltd.
Sir Martin has a number of other directorships and business interests, including acting as Chairman of GP Bullhound, the technology investment banking firm.
Sir Martin's pro-bono interests include being a founder of the Orchestra of the Age of Enlightenment of which he is Life President, and serving on the boards of a number of other arts organisations including the Glyndebourne Arts Trust and the Royal Academy of Music. He is a Director of ClientEarth. In 2008 Sir Martin with his family were founding benefactors of the Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment at Oxford University.
Standing for re-election: Yes
* Information as at 31 March 2021
Joined the Board in 2013
Remuneration: £32,282pa*
Sarah is a past Chair of the Association of Investment Companies and has been involved in the UK savings and investment industry in different roles for over 35 years.
Sarah is a fellow of CFA UK.
Sarah is non-executive Chair of Polar Capital Technology Trust plc and a non-executive Director of Alliance Trust PLC. Sarah is also Chair of The John Lewis Partnership Pensions Trust and of BBC Pension Investments Limited. She is a member of the Investment Committee of the Universities Superannuation Scheme and of the BBC Pension Scheme Investment Committee and is an Ambassador for Chapter Zero and a mentor for Chairmen Mentors International.
Standing for re-election: Yes
Joined the Board in 2018
Remuneration: Nil*
Sven H. Borho, CFA, is a founder and Managing Partner of OrbiMed. Sven heads the public equity team and he is the portfolio manager for OrbiMed's public equity and hedge funds. He has been a portfolio manager for the firm's funds since 1993 and has played an integral role in the growth of OrbiMed's asset management activities. He started his career in 1991 when he joined OrbiMed's predecessor firm as a Senior Analyst covering European pharmaceutical firms and biotechnology companies worldwide.
Sven is a Managing Partner of OrbiMed and does not have any other appointments.
Standing for re-election: Yes
Joined the Board in 2007
Remuneration: £34,622pa*
David is Chairman of the Nominations Committee and is the Senior Independent Director.
Shareholding in the Company 1,094
A qualified physician, David was formerly Investment Director of the life science activities of the seed fund of the University of Cambridge and the manager of the seed fund established by LifeArc (formerly known as MRC Technology). David attended London and Oxford Universities, and has an MBA from Harvard Business School. He has held senior positions in a number of blue chip biopharmaceutical organisations including GlaxoSmithKline and Roche.
David is a non-executive Director of Oxford Biodynamics plc and is Chairman of Trustees of the Liver Group Charity.
Standing for re-election: No
Humphrey van der Klugt, FCA Independent Non-Executive Director
Joined the Board in 2016
Remuneration: £39,551pa*
A Chartered Accountant, Humphrey is Chairman of the Audit Committee.
Shareholding in the Company 3,000
Humphrey was formerly Chairman of Fidelity European Values PLC and a Director of Murray Income Trust PLC, BlackRock Commodities Income Investment Trust plc and J P Morgan Claverhouse Investment Trust plc. Prior to this Humphrey was a fund manager and Director of Schroder Investment Management Limited and in a 22 year career was a member of their Group Investment and Asset Allocation Committees. Prior to joining Schroders, he was with Peat Marwick Mitchell & Co (now KPMG) where he qualified as a Chartered Accountant in 1979.
Humphrey is a non-executive Director of Allianz Technology Trust PLC.
Standing for re-election: Yes
Doug McCutcheon Independent Non-Executive Director
Joined the Board in 2012
Remuneration: £32,282pa*
Doug is Chairman of the Management Engagement & Remuneration Committee.
Shareholding in the Company 15,000
Doug is the President of Longview Asset Management Ltd., an investment firm that manages the capital of families, charities and endowments. Prior to this, Doug was an investment banker for 25 years at UBS and its predecessor firm, S.G. Warburg, where, most recently, he was the head of Healthcare Investment Banking for Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia-Pacific. Doug is involved in philanthropic organisations with a focus on healthcare and education. He attended Queen's University, Canada.
Doug is a non-executive Director of Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corporation.
Standing for re-election: Yes
Joined the Board in 2019
Remuneration: £32,282pa*
Shareholding in the Company 1,810
Dr Rawal, a physician with 25 years' experience in life sciences research and development, has held senior executive roles in drug development and scientific evaluation in four global pharmaceutical companies. She has also worked in senior roles with two medical research funding organisations: Wellcome Trust and Cancer Research UK.
Dr Rawal is a non-executive Director on the Board of the Innovation Agency (Northwest Coast Academic Health Science Network) where she supports the adoption and spread of innovation within the NHS. Dr Rawal is also a Trustee of three educational charities: the Social Mobility Foundation, the Children's University Trust, and the Quintin Hogg Trust.
Standing for re-election: Yes
The Directors present their Annual Report on the affairs of the Company together with the audited financial statements and the Independent Auditors' Report for the year ended 31 March 2021.
Details of the services provided under these agreements are included in the Strategic Report on pages 28 and 29.
Frostrow is the designated AIFM for the Company on the terms and subject to the conditions of the alternative investment fund management agreement between the Company and Frostrow (the "AIFM Agreement").
The notice period on the AIFM Agreement with Frostrow is 12 months, termination can be initiated by either party.
Details of the fee payable to Frostrow can be found on page 28.
Under the AIFM Agreement Frostrow has delegated the portfolio management function to OrbiMed, under a portfolio management agreement between it, the Company and Frostrow (the "Portfolio Management Agreement").
OrbiMed receives a periodic fee equal to 0.65% p.a. of the Company's NAV and a performance fee as set out in the Performance Fee section below. Its agreement with the Company may be terminated by either party giving notice of not less than 12 months.
Dependent on the level of long-term outperformance of the Company, OrbiMed is entitled to a performance fee. The performance fee is calculated by reference to the amount by which the Company's NAV performance has outperformed the Benchmark (see inside front cover for details of the Benchmark).
The fee is calculated quarterly by comparing the cumulative performance of the Company's NAV with the cumulative performance of the Benchmark since the launch of the Company in 1995. The performance fee amounts to 15.0% of any outperformance over the Benchmark. Provision is made
within the daily NAV per share calculation as required and in accordance with generally accepted accounting standards.
In order to ensure that only sustained outperformance is rewarded, at each quarterly calculation date any performance fee payable is based on the lower of:
less any cumulative outperformance on which a performance fee has already been paid.
The effect of this is that outperformance has to be maintained for a twelve month period before it is paid.
The performance fee charge for the year was £31.7m (2020: nil) and is represented by a provision for potential future performance fee payments of £31.7m as at 31 March 2021 (2020: nil). The maximum amount that could become payable by 31 March 2022 is £31.7m if the level of outperformance as at 31 March 2021 is maintained.
The Company appointed J.P. Morgan Europe Limited (the "Depositary") as its Depositary in accordance with the AIFMD on the terms and subject to the conditions of the Depositary agreement between the Company, Frostrow and the Depositary (the "Depositary Agreement").
Under the terms of the Depositary Agreement the Company has agreed to pay the Depositary a fee calculated at 1.75bp on net assets up to £150 million, 1.50 bps on net assets between £150 million and £300 million, 1.00bps on net assets between £300 million and £500 million and 0.50bps on net assets above £500 million.
The Depositary has delegated the custody and safekeeping of the Company's assets to J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (the "Custodian and Prime Broker") pursuant to a delegation agreement between the Company, Frostrow, the Depositary and the Custodian and Prime Broker (the "Delegation Agreement").
The Delegation Agreement transfers the Depositary's liability for the loss of the Company's financial instruments held in custody by the Custodian and Prime Broker to the
Custodian and Prime Broker in accordance with the AIFMD. The Company has consented to the transfer and reuse of its assets by the Custodian and Prime Broker (known as "rehypothecation") in accordance with the terms of an institutional account agreement between the Company, the Custodian and Prime Broker and certain other J.P. Morgan entities (as defined therein). See page 29 for further details.
The Company appointed J.P. Morgan Securities LLC on the terms and subject to the conditions of the prime brokerage agreement between the Company, Frostrow and the Depositary (the "Prime Brokerage Agreement"). The Custodian and Prime Broker receives interest on the drawn overdraft as detailed in note 12 on page 87.
The Custodian and Prime Broker is a registered brokerdealer and is regulated by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
The results attributable to shareholders for the year and the transfer to reserves are shown on pages 74 and 75. Details of the Company's dividend record can be found on page 3.
The Company was aware of the following substantial interests in the voting rights of the Company as at 30 April 2021, the latest practicable date before publication of the Annual Report:
| 30 April 2021 | 31 March 2021 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shareholder | Number of shares |
% of issued share capital |
Number of shares |
% of issued share capital |
|
| Rathbone Brothers plc | 6,019,265 | 9.3 | 6,012,046 | 9.4 | |
| Investec Wealth & Investment Limited | 4,327,743 | 6.7 | 4,340,504 | 6.8 | |
| Hargreaves Lansdown plc | 4,087,951 | 6.3 | 3,993,108 | 6.2 | |
| Interactive Investor | 3,781,979 | 5.8 | 3,725,087 | 5.8 | |
| Charles Stanley & Co Limited | 2,892,861 | 4.5 | 2,875,378 | 4.5 | |
| Forsyth Barr | 2,525,018 | 3.9 | 2,383,878 | 3.7 | |
| Brewin Dolphin | 2,457,427 | 3.8 | 2,453,737 | 3.8 | |
| Quilter Cheviot Investment Management | 2,310,264 | 3.6 | 2,336,709 | 3.6 |
As at 31 March 2021 the Company had 64,310,255 shares in issue. As at 30 April 2021 there were 64,849,255 shares in issue.
Directors' & officers' liability insurance cover was maintained by the Company during the year ended 31 March 2021 and to the date of this report. It is intended that this policy will continue for the year ending 31 March 2022 and subsequent years.
During the year under review and to the date of this report, indemnities were in force between the Company and each of its Directors under which the Company has agreed to indemnify each Director, to the extent permitted by law, in respect of certain liabilities incurred as a result of carrying out his or her role as a Director of the Company. The Directors are also indemnified against the costs of defending any criminal or civil proceedings or any claim by the Company or a regulator as they are incurred provided that where the defence is unsuccessful the Director must repay those defence costs to the Company. The indemnities are qualifying third party indemnity provisions for the purposes of the Companies Act 2006.
A copy of each deed of indemnity is available for inspection at the Company's registered office during normal business hours and will be available for inspection at the Annual General Meeting. Please refer to the Chairman's Statement on pages 4 to 6 for details of this year's Annual General Meeting arrangements.
The Company's capital structure is composed solely of ordinary shares.
During the year under review and to the date of this report, no shares were bought back by the Company to be held in treasury.
During the year, a total of 10,690,977 new shares were issued at an average premium of 0.8% to the prevailing cum income NAV per share.
Since the year end, to 2 June 2021, 752,000 new shares have been issued at an average premium of 0.8% to the prevailing cum income NAV per share.
Details of the voting rights in the Company's shares at the date of this Annual Report are given in note 9 to the Notice of Annual General Meeting on page 105.
The Company has not in the past and does not intend in the future to make political or charitable donations.
The Company does not provide goods or services in the normal course of business, and as a financial investment vehicle does not have customers. The Directors do not therefore consider that the Company is required to make a statement under the Modern Slavery Act 2015 in relation to slavery or human trafficking.
The Board has adopted a zero tolerance approach to instances of bribery and corruption. Accordingly it expressly prohibits any Director or associated persons when acting on behalf of the Company, from accepting, soliciting, paying, offering or promising to pay or authorise any payment, public or private in the UK or abroad to secure any improper benefit for themselves or for the Company.
The Board ensures that its service providers apply the same standards in their activities for the Company.
A copy of the Company's Anti Bribery and Corruption Policy can be found on its website at www.worldwidewh.com. The policy is reviewed regularly by the Audit Committee.
The Company has a commitment to zero tolerance towards the criminal facilitation of tax evasion.
The Company has no greenhouse gas emissions to report from its operations, nor does it have responsibility for any other emissions producing sources under the Companies Act 2006 (Strategic Reports and Directors' Reports) Regulations 2013 or the Companies (Directors' Report) and Limited Liability Partnerships (Energy and Carbon Report) Regulations 2018, including those within the Company's underlying investment portfolio. Consequently, the Company consumed less than 40,000 kWh of energy during the year in respect of which the Report of the Directors is prepared and therefore is exempt from the disclosures required under the Streamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting criteria.
CRS is a global standard for the automatic exchange of information commissioned by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development and incorporated into UK law by the International Tax Compliance Regulations 2015. CRS requires the Company to provide certain additional details to HMRC in relation to certain shareholders. The reporting obligation began in 2016 and is an annual requirement. The Registrars, Link Group, have been engaged to collate such information and file the reports with HMRC on behalf of the Company.
The Corporate Governance Report is set out on pages 49 to 56.
The financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis. The Directors consider this is the appropriate basis as the Company has adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future, being taken as 12 months after approval of the financial statements. The Company's shareholders are asked every five years to vote for the continuation of the Company, this will next be put to shareholders at the Annual General Meeting to be held in 2024. The content of the Company's portfolio, trading activity, the Company's cash balances and revenue forecasts, and the trends and factors likely to affect the Company's performance are reviewed and discussed at each Board
meeting. The Board has considered a detailed assessment of the Company's ability to meet its liabilities as they fall due, including stress and liquidity tests which modelled the effects of substantial falls in markets and significant reductions in market liquidity, on the Company's net asset value, its cash flows and its expenses. Further information is provided in the Audit Committee report beginning on page 57.
Based on the information available to the Directors at the date of this report, including the results of these stress tests, the conclusions drawn in the Viability Statement beginning on page 34, the Company's cash balances, and the liquidity of the Company's listed investments, the Directors are satisfied that the Company has adequate financial resources to continue in operation for at least the next 12 months and that, accordingly, it is appropriate to continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the financial statements.
Amendments of the Company's Articles of Association requires a special resolution to be passed by shareholders.
A Special Resolution to adopt new Articles of Association is to be proposed at this year's Annual General Meeting. Further information can be found on page 111.
Listing Rule 9.8.4 requires the Company to include certain information in a single identifiable section of the Annual Report or a cross reference table indicating where the information is set out. The Directors confirm that there are no disclosures to be made under Listing Rule 9.8.4.
By order of the Board
Company Secretary 3 June 2021
The Directors are responsible for preparing the Financial Statements in accordance with applicable law and regulations. In preparing these financial statements, the Directors are required to:
The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the Company's transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the Company and enable them to ensure that the financial statements and the Directors' Remuneration Report comply with the Companies Act 2006. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the Company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.
The Directors are responsible for ensuring that the Report of the Directors and other information included in the Annual Report is prepared in accordance with company law in the United Kingdom. They are also responsible for ensuring that the Annual Report includes information required by the Listing Rules of the FCA.
The financial statements are published on the Company's website www.worldwidewh.com and via Frostrow's website www.frostrow.com. The maintenance and integrity of these websites, so far as it relates to the Company, is the responsibility of Frostrow. The work carried out by the Auditors does not involve consideration of the maintenance and integrity of these websites and, accordingly, the Auditors accept no responsibility for any changes that have occurred to the financial statements since they were initially presented on these websites. Visitors to the websites need to be aware that legislation in the United Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination of the financial statements may differ from legislation in their jurisdiction.
So far as the Directors are aware, there is no relevant information of which the Auditors are unaware. The Directors have taken all steps they ought to have taken to make themselves aware of any relevant audit information and to establish that the Auditors are aware of such information.
The Directors confirm to the best of their knowledge that:
On behalf of the Board
Chairman 3 June 2021
Responsibility for effective governance lies with the Board. The governance framework of the Company reflects the fact that as an investment company it has no employees and outsources portfolio management to OrbiMed and risk management, company management, company secretarial, administrative and marketing services to Frostrow.
Senior Independent Director – Dr David Holbrook
Five additional non-executive Directors, all considered independent, except for Sven Borho.
Doug McCutcheon All Independent Directors
Humphrey van der Klugt, FCA* All Independent Directors (excluding the Chairman, Sir Martin Smith)
Dr David Holbrook All Independent Directors
* The Directors believe that Humphrey van der Klugt has the necessary recent and relevant financial experience to Chair the Company's Audit Committee.
Copies of the full terms of reference, which clearly define the responsibilities of each Committee, can be obtained from the Company Secretary and can be found at the Company's website at www.worldwidewh.com.
The Board is committed to maintaining and demonstrating high standards of corporate governance. The Board has considered the principles and recommendations of the AIC Code of Corporate Governance published in February 2019 ('AIC Code'). The AIC Code addresses all the principles set out in the UK Corporate Governance Code (the 'UK Code'), as well as setting out additional provisions on issues that are of specific relevance to the Company.
The Financial Reporting Council has confirmed that by following the AIC Code boards of investment companies will meet their obligations in relation to the UK Code and paragraph 9.8.6 of the UK Listing Rules.
The Board considers that reporting in accordance with the principles and recommendations of the AIC Code provides more relevant and comprehensive information to shareholders. The AIC Code can be viewed at www.theaic.co.uk and the UK Code can be viewed on the Financial Reporting Council website at www.frc.org.uk. The Corporate Governance Report on pages 49 to 56, forms part of the Report of the Directors on pages 44 to 47.
The purpose and strategy of the Company are described in the Strategic Report.
The Board is responsible for the effective Stewardship of the Company's affairs. Strategy issues and all operational matters of a material nature are considered at its meetings.
The Board consists of seven non-executive Directors, each of whom, with the exception of Sven Borho, is independent of OrbiMed and the Company's other service providers. No member of the Board is a Director of another investment company managed by OrbiMed, nor has any Board member (with the exception of Sven Borho) been an employee of OrbiMed or any of the Company's service providers. Further details regarding the Directors can be found on pages 41 to 43.
The Board carefully considers the various guidelines for determining the independence of non-executive Directors, placing particular weight on the view that independence
is evidenced by an individual being independent of mind, character and judgement. All Directors retire at the AGM each year and, if appropriate, seek election or re-election. Each Director has signed a letter of appointment to formalise the terms of their engagement as a non-executive Director, copies of which are available on request at the office of Frostrow Capital LLP.
The Board aims to consider and discuss differences of opinion, unique vantage points and to exploit fully areas of expertise. The Chairman encourages open debate to foster a supportive and co-operative approach for all participants. Strategic decisions are discussed openly and constructively. The Board aims to be open and transparent with shareholders and other stakeholders and for the Company to conduct itself responsibly, ethically and fairly in its relationships with service providers.
The Board has gained assurance on whistleblowing procedures at the Company's principal service providers to ensure employees at those companies are supported in speaking up and raising concerns. No concerns relating to the Company were raised during the year.
The Company has appointed Frostrow to provide marketing and investor relations services, in the belief that a well marketed investment company is more likely to grow over time, have a more diverse, stable list of shareholders and its shares will trade at close to net asset value per share over the long run. Frostrow actively promotes the Company as set out on page 33.
The Board, the AIFM and the Portfolio Manager consider maintaining good communications with shareholders and engaging with larger shareholders through meetings and presentations a key priority. Shareholders are being informed by the publication of annual and half-year reports which include financial statements. These reports are supplemented by the daily release of the net asset value per share to the London Stock Exchange and the publication of monthly fact sheets. All this information, including interviews with the Portfolio Manager, is available on the Company's website at www.worldwidewh.com.
The Board supports the principle that the Annual General Meeting be used to communicate with private investors, in particular. Shareholders are usually encouraged to attend the Annual General Meeting, where they are normally given the opportunity to question the Chairman, the Board and representatives of the Portfolio Manager. In addition, the Portfolio Manager usually makes a presentation to shareholders covering the investment performance and strategy of the Company at the Annual General meeting. However, in light of continuing uncertainty relating to the coronavirus pandemic at the date of this report, the Board has made different arrangements for the forthcoming AGM and these are explained in the Chairman's Statement. Details of the proxy votes received in respect of each resolution will be made available on the Company's website.
The Board monitors the share register of the Company; it also reviews correspondence from shareholders at each meeting and maintains regular contact with major shareholders. Shareholders who wish to raise matters with a Director may do so by writing to them at the registered office of the Company.
Details of the shareholders with substantial interests in the Company's shares, the Directors' authorities to issue and repurchase the Company's shares, and the voting rights of the shares are set out in the Directors' Report.
The Board meets formally at least four times each year. During the lockdown period introduced as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Board continued to meet virtually. A representative of OrbiMed attends all meetings; representatives from Frostrow Capital LLP are also in attendance at each Board meeting. The Chairman encourages open debate to foster a supportive and co‑operative approach for all participants.
The Board has agreed a schedule of matters specifically reserved for decision by the Board. This includes establishing the investment objectives, strategy and the Benchmark, the permitted types or categories of investments, the markets in which transactions may be undertaken, the amount or proportion of the assets that may be invested in any geography or category of investment or in any one investment, and the Company's share issuance and share buyback policies.
The Board, at its regular meetings, undertakes reviews of key investment and financial data, revenue projections and expenses, analyses of asset allocation, transactions and performance comparisons, share price and net asset value performance, marketing and shareholder communication strategies, the risks associated with pursuing the investment strategy, peer group information and industry issues.
The Chairman is responsible for ensuring that the Board receives accurate, timely and clear information. Representatives of OrbiMed and Frostrow Capital LLP report regularly to the Board on issues affecting the Company.
The Board is responsible for strategy and has established an annual programme of agenda items under which it reviews the objectives and strategy for the Company at each meeting.
Company Directors have a statutory obligation to avoid a situation in which they (and connected persons) have, or can have, a direct or indirect interest that conflicts, or may possibly conflict, with the interests of the Company. The Board has in place procedures for managing any actual or potential conflicts of interest. No conflicts of interest arose during the year under review.
With the day to day management of the Company outsourced to service providers the Board's primary focus at each Board meeting is reviewing the investment performance and associated matters, such as, inter alia, future outlook and strategy, gearing, asset allocation, investor relations, marketing, and industry issues.
In line with its primary focus, the Board retains responsibility for all the key elements of the Company's strategy and business model, including:
a review of performance against the Company's KPIs;
a review of the performance and continuing appointment of service providers; and
The Investment Objective, Policy, and Benchmark, including the related limits and guidelines, are set out on pages 7 and 8, along with details of the gearing and leverage levels allowed.
Details of the principal KPIs and further information on the principal service providers, their performance and continuing appointment, along with details of the principal risks, and how they are managed, are set out in the Strategic Report.
The Corporate Governance Report, on pages 49 to 56, includes a statement of compliance with corporate governance codes and best practice, and the Business Review (pages 27 to 40) includes details of the internal control and risk management framework within which the Board operates.
The Board regularly considers its structure and recognises the need for progressive refreshment. (Please see the Chairman's Statement on page 5 for further information).
The Board has an approved succession planning policy to ensure that (i) there is a formal, rigorous and transparent procedure for the appointment of new Directors; and (ii) the Board is comprised of members who collectively display the necessary balance of professional skills, experience, length of service and industry/Company knowledge.
During the year, the Board reviewed the policy on Directors' tenure and considered the overall length of service of the Board as a whole.
The tenure of each non-executive Director, including the Chairman, is not ordinarily expected to exceed nine years. However, the Board has agreed that the tenure of the Chairman may be extended for an agreed time provided such an extension is conducive to the Board's overall orderly succession. The Board believes that this more flexible
approach to the tenure of the Chairman is appropriate in the context of the regulatory rules that apply to investment companies, which ensure that the chair remains independent after appointment, while being consistent with the need for regular refreshment and diversity.
The Board is, however, currently in the process of refreshing its membership which will mean that certain Directors will serve for longer than nine years to ensure that the changes to be implemented are made in an orderly and structured manner. Further details of this process can be found in the Chairman's Statement on page 5.
The Board subscribes to the view that long serving Directors should not necessarily be prevented from forming part of an independent majority. The Board considers that a Director's tenure does not necessarily reduce his or her ability to act independently and will continue to assess each Director's independence annually, through a formal performance evaluation. Please see page 53 for further information.
The Nominations Committee considers annually the skills possessed by the Board and identifies any skill shortages to be filled by new Directors.
The rules governing the appointment and replacement of Directors are set out in the Company's articles of association and the aforementioned succession planning policy. Where the Board appoints a new Director during the year, that Director will stand for election by shareholders at the next Annual General Meeting (AGM). Subject to there being no conflict of interest, all Directors are entitled to vote on candidates for the appointment of new Directors and on the recommendation for shareholders' approval for the Directors seeking re-election at the AGM. When considering new appointments, the Board endeavours to ensure that it has the capabilities required to be effective and oversee the Company's strategic priorities. This will include an appropriate range, balance and diversity of skills, experience and knowledge. The Company is committed to ensuring that any vacancies arising are filled by the most qualified candidates.
The Company supports the objectives of improving the performance of corporate boards by encouraging the appointment of the best people from a range of differing perspectives and backgrounds. The Company recognises the benefits of diversity (of which gender is one aspect) on the Board and takes this into account in its Board appointments. The Company is committed to ensuring that its director search processes actively seek men and
women with the right qualifications so that appointments can be made, on the basis of merit, against objective criteria from a diverse selection of candidates. The Board actively considers diversity during director searches.
The Board is currently in the process of refreshing its membership. Its intention is for not less than one-third of its membership to be women over time.
The number of meetings held during the year of the Board and its Committees, and each Director's attendance level, is shown below:
| Board (5) |
Audit Committee (2) |
Nominations Committee (1) |
Management Engagement & Remuneration Committee (1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | – | 1 | 1 |
| 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| 4 | – | – | – |
| 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
^ Sir Martin Smith is not a member of the Audit Committee
* Sven Borho does not sit on any of the Company's Committees.
All of the serving Directors attended the Annual General Meeting held on 9 July 2020, and also a General Meeting of the Company held on 12 February 2021.
During the year an external independent review of the Board, its committees and individual Directors (including each Director's independence) was carried out by an independent third party, Lintstock, in the form of electronic performance evaluation questionnaires. The Board reviewed the report from Lintstock and the Chairman is leading on implementing those changes recommended by the report that the Board considered should be made. While the Board's composition was rated highly, the importance of replacing the skills of departing Directors was noted. It was also noted the Board would benefit from additional training such as focussed training sessions on areas such as AI.
The review concluded that the Board worked in a collegiate efficient and effective manner, and there were no material weaknesses or concerns identified.
As an independent external review of the Board was undertaken in 2021 the next such review will be held in 2024.
The Board pays close attention to the capacity of individual Directors to carry out their work on behalf of the Company. In recommending individual Directors to shareholders for re-election, it considered their other Board positions and their time commitments and is satisfied that each Director has the capacity to be fully engaged with the Company's business. The Board has considered the position of all of the Directors as part of the evaluation process, and believes that it would
be in the Company's best interests to propose them for reelection (with the exception of Dr David Holbrook who will be retiring from the Board at the conclusion of this year's Annual General Meeting) at the forthcoming Annual General Meeting for the following reasons:
Sir Martin Smith, has been a Director since November 2007 and Chairman since July 2008, though having served on the Board for more than nine years from the date of his first election, the Board is firmly of the view that he can be considered independent. Sir Martin has extensive knowledge of the financial sector and was a founder and senior partner of Phoenix Securities, becoming Chairman of European Investment Banking for Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette (DLJ) following the acquisition of Phoenix by DLJ. He was subsequently a founder of New Star Asset Management Limited. He has been Chairman or Director of numerous growing companies over the past 30 years.
Sarah Bates has been a Director since May 2013. Sarah is a past Chair of the Association of Investment Companies and has a wealth of experience of the investment trust sector. She and has been involved in the UK savings and investment industry in different roles for over 35 years. If re-elected Sarah will become the Chairman of the Nominations Committee and the Senior Independent Director on Dr David Holbrook's retirement.
Sven Borho joined the Board in June 2018. Sven is a founder and Managing Partner of OrbiMed and heads their public Equity team and is the portfolio Manager for OrbiMed's public equity and hedge funds.
Humphrey van der Klugt joined the Board in February 2016. A former fund manager and Director of Schroder Investment Management Limited, Humphrey has extensive experience of the investment trust sector. He is a Chartered Accountant, and Chairman of the Audit Committee.
Doug McCutcheon joined the Board in November 2012. Doug was an investment banker at S.G Warburg and then UBS for 25 years, most recently as the head of Healthcare Investment Banking for Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia-Pacific. He is Chairman of the Management Engagement & Remuneration Committee.
Dr Bina Rawal joined the Board on November 2019. A physician with 25 years' experience in life sciences research and development, she has held senior executive roles in drug development and scientific evaluation in four global pharmaceutical companies.
The Chairman is pleased to report that following a formal performance evaluation, the Directors' performance continues to be effective and they continue to demonstrate commitment to the role.
New appointees to the Board are provided with a full induction programme. The programme covers the Company's investment strategy, policies and practices. The Directors are also given key information on the Company's regulatory and statutory requirements as they arise including information on the role of the Board, matters reserved for its decision, the terms of reference of the Board Committees, the Company's corporate governance practices and procedures and the latest financial information. It is the Chairman's responsibility to ensure that the Directors have sufficient knowledge to fulfil their role and Directors are encouraged to participate in training courses where appropriate.
The Directors have access to the advice and services of a Company Secretary through its appointed representative which is responsible to the Board for ensuring that Board procedures are followed and that applicable rules and regulations are complied with. The Company Secretary is also responsible for ensuring good information flows between all parties.
There is an agreed procedure for Directors, in the furtherance of their duties, to take independent professional advice if necessary at the Company's expense.
The Board has overall responsibility for the Company's risk management and internal control systems and for reviewing their effectiveness. The Company applies the guidance published by the Financial Reporting Council on internal controls. Internal control systems are designed to manage, rather than eliminate, the risk of failure to achieve the business objective and can provide only reasonable and not absolute assurance against material misstatement or loss. These controls aim to ensure that the assets of the Company are safeguarded, that proper accounting records are maintained and that the Company's financial information is reliable. The Directors have a robust process for identifying, evaluating and managing the significant risks faced by the Company, which are recorded in a risk matrix. The Audit Committee, on behalf of the Board,
considers each risk as well as reviewing the mitigating controls in place. Each risk is rated for its "likelihood" and "impact" and the resultant numerical rating determines its ranking into 'Principal/Key', 'Significant' or 'Minor'. This process was in operation during the year and continues in place up to the date of this report. The process also involves the Audit Committee receiving and examining regular reports from the Company's principal service providers. The Board then receives a detailed report from the Audit Committee on its findings. The Directors have not identified any significant failures or weaknesses in respect of the Company's internal control systems.
Beneficial owners of shares who have been nominated by the registered holder of those shares to receive information rights under section 146 of the Companies Act 2006 are required to direct all communications to the registered holder of their shares rather than to the Company's registrar, Link Group, or to the Company directly.
The Company has adopted a nominee share code which is set out on the following page.
The annual and half-year financial reports, and a monthly fact sheet are available to all shareholders. The Board, with the advice of Frostrow, reviews the format of the annual and half-year financial reports so as to ensure they are useful to all shareholders and others taking an interest in the Company. In accordance with best practice, the annual report, including the Notice of the Annual General Meeting, is sent to shareholders at least 20 working days before the meeting. Separate resolutions are proposed for substantive issues.
THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION TO BE CONSIDERED AT THE FORTHCOMING ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING IS IMPORTANT AND REQUIRES YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION.
If you are in any doubt about the action you should take, you should seek advice from your stock broker, bank manager, solicitor, accountant or other financial adviser authorised under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (as amended). If you have sold or transferred all of your ordinary shares in the Company, you should pass
this document, together with any other accompanying documents, including the form of proxy, at once to the purchaser or transferee, or to the stock broker, bank or other agent through whom the sale or transfer was effected, for onward transmission to the purchaser or transferee
The Company's Annual General Meeting will be held at the offices of Frostrow Capital LLP, 25 Southampton Buildings, London WC2A 1AL on Thursday, 8 July 2021 from 1.00 p.m. Please refer to the Chairman's Statement beginning on page 4 for details of this year's arrangements.
Resolutions relating to the following items of special business will be proposed at the forthcoming Annual General Meeting.
| Resolution 12 | Authority to allot shares |
|---|---|
| Resolution 13 | Authority to disapply pre-emption rights |
| Resolution 14 | Authority to sell shares held in Treasury on a non pre-emptive basis |
| Resolution 15 | Authority to buy back shares |
| Resolution 16 | Authority to hold General Meetings (other than the Annual General Meeting) on at least 14 clear days' notice |
| Resolution 17 | Authority to adopt new Articles of Association |
The full text of the resolutions can be found in the Notice of Annual General Meeting on pages 102 to 105. Explanatory notes regarding the resolutions can be found on pages 106 and 107.
The Board and the AIFM have delegated authority to OrbiMed to vote the shares owned by the Company. The Board has instructed that OrbiMed submit votes for such shares wherever possible. This accords with current best practice whilst maintaining a primary focus on financial returns. OrbiMed may refer to the Board on any matters of a contentious nature. The Board has reviewed OrbiMed's Voting Guidelines and is satisfied with their approach.
The Company does not retain voting rights on any shares that are held as collateral in connection with the overdraft facility provided by J.P. Morgan Securities LLC.
Where shares are held in a nominee company name, the Company undertakes:
Nominee companies are encouraged to provide the necessary authority to underlying shareholders to attend the Company's general meetings.
By order of the Board
Company Secretary 3 June 2021
I am pleased to present my formal report to shareholders as Chairman of the Audit Committee, for the year ended 31 March 2021.
The Committee comprises those Directors considered to be independent by the Board. The Chairman of the Board is not a member of the Committee but attends meetings by invitation. The Committee met twice during the year and attendance by each Director is shown in the table on page 53. The Board has taken note of the requirements that the Committee as a whole should have competence relevant to the sector in which the Company operates and that at least one member of the Committee should have recent and relevant financial experience. The Committee is satisfied that it is properly constituted in both respects. I was appointed Chairman of the Committee in 2016 and am a Fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, I am also the Chairman of the Audit Committee of one other public company; the other Committee members have a combination of financial, investment and other relevant experience gained throughout their careers.
The Audit Committee's main responsibilities during the year were:
A comprehensive description of the Committee's role, its duties and responsibilities, can be found in its terms of reference which are available for review on the Company's website at www.worldwidewh.com. The terms of reference have been updated to incorporate the changes introduced by the 2019 AIC Code of Corporate Governance.
The production of the Company's Annual Report (including the audit by the Company's external Auditors) is a thorough process involving input from a number of different areas. In order to be able to confirm that the Annual Report is fair, balanced and understandable, the Board has requested that the Committee advise on whether it considers these criteria
have been satisfied. As part of this process the Committee has considered the following:
As a result of the work undertaken by the Committee, it has confirmed to the Board that the Annual Report for the year ended 31 March 2021, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable and provides the information necessary for shareholders to assess the Company's financial position, performance, business model and strategy.
In the last couple of years, the UK audit sector has been subject to a number of reviews, such as those conducted by the Competition and Markets Authority into the Statutory Audit Market and the Kingman Review of the FRC which have resulted in a number of recommendations by the Department of Business, Enterprise, Industry and Skills ('BEIS'), which the BEIS is currently consulting on.
The Audit Committee has considered the various recommendations and how they may potentially affect the Company should they be implemented.
The various reviews have also coincided with the FRC's own consultation proposing important changes to the UK's Ethical and Auditing Standards (last updated in 2016) which led to the publication of the revised Standards in December 2019, effective from 15 March 2020.
The Committee updated the non audit services policy in‑line with the ethical standards and does not at this time recommend any change to the current practices employed in the external audit process in response to these reviews, but will continue to monitor developments as they unfold.
In addition to this, the Committee also reviews the outcomes of the FRC's annual Audit Quality Reviews and discusses the findings with our Auditor.
The Audit Committee dealt with this matter by considering the draft Annual Report, a letter from Frostrow in support of the letter of representation made by the Board to the Auditors and the Auditors' Report to the Audit Committee.
The Audit Committee dealt with this matter by:
The Company has the ability to make unquoted investments within its investment portfolio, up to a limit of 10% of the portfolio at the time of acquisition. Both the Company's Directors and the AIFM need to ensure that an appropriate value is placed on such investments within the Company's net asset value. The Committee has worked with the Company's Portfolio Manager and the AIFM to establish clear guidelines for the valuation of unquoted
investments, including the use of valuations produced by independent external valuers, where appropriate.
The COVID-19 pandemic commenced before the 2020 Annual Report was mailed out to shareholders and the Committee gave in-depth consideration to its potential effects on the Company. The long-term effect of the pandemic on the global economy will become clearer in time and the Committee will continue to monitor the impact of COVID-19, which is also captured in the Company's risk register.
In order to mitigate the business risks caused by the pandemic, the Committee continues to review the operational resilience of its various service providers, who have continued to demonstrate their ability to provide services to the expected level, whilst doing so remotely.
The AIFM, Portfolio Management and Performance fees are calculated in accordance with the AIFM and Portfolio Management Agreements. The Auditors perform agreed upon procedures over any performance fee prior to payment. The Auditors also recalculate the AIFM and Portfolio Management fee as part of the audit.
The Committee approached and dealt with ensuring compliance with Section 1158 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010, by seeking confirmation that the Company continues to meet the eligibility conditions on a monthly basis.
The Committee gained an overall understanding of the performance of the investment portfolio both in capital and revenue terms through ongoing discussions and analysis with the Company's Portfolio Manager and also with comparison to suitable key performance indicators (see page 28).
During the year the Committee ensured that the accounting policies, as set out on pages 78 to 82, were applied
consistently throughout the year. In light of there being no unusual transactions during the year or other possible reasons, the Committee agreed that there was no reason to change the policies.
Having reviewed the Company's financial position and liabilities, the Committee is satisfied that it is appropriate for the Board to prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis. Further detail is provided on page 47. The Committee's review of the Company's financial position included consideration of the cash and cash equivalent position of the Company; the diversification of the portfolio; and the analysis of portfolio liquidity, which estimated a liquidation of c.80% of the portfolio within 10 trading days (based on current market volumes).
The Committee also considered the longer-term viability of the Company in connection with the Board's statement in the Strategic Report on pages 35 and 36. The Committee reviewed the Company's financial position (including its cash flows and liquidity position), the principal risks and uncertainties, the expectation that the Company will pass the next continuation vote in 2024, and the results of stress tests and scenarios which considered the impact of severe stock market volatility on shareholders' funds. This included modelling substantial market falls, and significantly reduced market liquidity. The scenarios assumed that there would be no recovery in asset prices and that listed portfolio companies which have cut or cancelled any dividends due since the coronavirus outbreak would not reinstate them.
The results demonstrated the impact on the Company's NAV, its expenses, its cash flows and its ability to meet its liabilities. In even the most stressed scenario, the Company was shown to have sufficient cash, or to be able to liquidate a sufficient portion of its listed holdings, in order to be able to meet its liabilities as they fall due. Based on the information available to the Directors at the time, the Committee therefore concluded it was reasonable for the Board to expect that the Company will be able to continue in operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due over the next five financial years. The Committee expects that the Company will continue to exist for the foreseeable future and at least for the period of the assessment.
As set out on page 29 the Board is responsible for the risk assessment and review of internal controls of the Company, undertaken in the context of the overall investment objective.
The review covers the key business, operational, compliance and financial risks facing the Company. In arriving at its judgement of what risks the Company faces, the Board has considered the Company's operations in the light of the following factors:
Against this background, a risk matrix has been developed which covers all key risks the Company faces, the likelihood of their occurrence and their potential impact, how these risks are monitored and mitigating controls in place. The Board has delegated to the Audit Committee the responsibility for the review and maintenance of the risk matrix and it reviews, in detail, the risk matrix each time it meets, bearing in mind any changes to the Company, its environment or service providers since the last review. Any significant changes to the risk matrix are discussed with the whole Board.
In addition to reviewing the systems of internal control in place at the Company's principal service providers, the Committee also reviewed the cyber security strategies adopted by them.
The Committee reviewed the Half Year Report and Financial Statements, which are not audited or reviewed by the external Auditor, to ensure that the accounting policies used in the Annual Financial Statements were also used at the half-year stage and that they portrayed a fair balanced and understandable picture of the period in question.
The Committee considered whether there was a need for the Company to have an internal audit function. As the Company delegates its day-to-day operations to third parties and has no employees, the Committee concluded that there was no such need.
This year the nature and scope of the audit together with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP's audit plan were considered by the Committee on 5 November 2020. I, as Chairman of the Committee, had a separate meeting with them specifically to discuss the audit and any issues that arose. The Committee then met PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP on 20 May 2021 via video conference to review formally the outcome of the audit and to discuss the limited issues that arose. The Committee also discussed the presentation of the Annual Report with the Auditors and sought their perspective.
In order to fulfil the Committee's responsibility regarding the independence of the Auditors, the Committee reviewed:
The Committee approved a fee of £38,000 for the audit for the year ended 31 March 2021 (2020: £32,000). While this represents an increase on the previous year's fee, the Committee believes that the fee is in line with general audit fees payable for the quoted investment trust sector and is reflective of the level of work required to audit a listed company.
The Company operates on the basis whereby the provision of all non-audit services by the Auditors has to be pre-approved
by the Audit Committee. Such services are only permissible where no conflicts of interest arise, the service is not expressly prohibited by audit legislation, where the independence of the Auditors is not likely to be impinged by undertaking the work and the quality and the objectivity of both the non-audit work and audit work will not be compromised. The Audit Committee will monitor the need for non-audit work to be performed by the Auditor, if any, in accordance with the Company's nonaudit services policy which was updated in November 2020 to take the FRC's revised Ethical and Auditing Standards into consideration. A copy of the Company's non-audit services policy can be found on the Company's website at www.worldwidewh.com
No non-audit fees were payable to the Auditors during the year (2020: £nil).
The Audit Committee has considered the extent and nature of non-audit work performed by the Auditors and is satisfied that this did not impinge on their independence and is a cost effective way for the Company to operate.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP were appointed on 14 July 2014 following a formal tender process and this appointment has been renewed at each subsequent AGM. The Committee reviews the re-appointment of the Auditors every year and the need to put the audit out to tender. Based on existing legislation, another tender process will be conducted no later than 2024. The Company is therefore in compliance with the provisions of "The Statutory Audit Services for Large Companies Market Investigation" (Mandatory use of competitive tender process and audit committee responsibilities) Order 2014 as issued by the Competition & Markets Authority. When necessary, the Committee discusses engagement and partner rotation with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. There are no contractual or similar obligations restricting the Company's choice of auditors.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP have indicated their willingness to continue to act as Auditors to the Company for the forthcoming year and a resolution for their re‑appointment will be proposed at the Annual General Meeting.
The Committee reviews the scope and effectiveness of the audit process, including agreeing the Auditors' assessment of materiality and monitors the Auditors' independence and objectivity. It conducted a review of the performance of the Auditors during the year and concluded that performance was satisfactory and there were no grounds for change.
Lintstock, an independent third party, commented on the effectiveness of the Committee as part of their evaluation of the Board which took place during the year (see page 53). In particular, the Committee Chair was seen to be highly knowledgeable and thorough, and to have managed the increasing complexity and scope of the audit in an excellent manner.
The Audit Committee confirms that it has carried out a review of the effectiveness of the system of internal financial control and risk management during the year, as set out above and that:
Chairman of the Audit Committee 3 June 2021
This report has been prepared in accordance with Schedule 8 of the Large and Medium-sized Companies and Groups (Accounts and Reports) (Amendment) Regulation 2013, the requirements of Section 421 of the Companies Act 2006 and the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013. A nonbinding Ordinary Resolution for the approval of this report will be put to shareholders at the Company's forthcoming Annual General Meeting (AGM). The law requires the Company's Auditors to audit certain of the disclosures provided in this report. Where disclosures have been audited, they are indicated as such and the Auditors' audit opinion is included in its report to shareholders on pages 65 to 73.
The Management Engagement & Remuneration Committee considers the framework for the remuneration of the Directors on an annual basis. It reviews the ongoing appropriateness of the Directors' Remuneration Policy and the individual remuneration of Directors by reference to the activities and particular complexities of the Company and comparison with other companies of a similar structure and size. This is in-line with the AIC Code.
A non-binding Ordinary Resolution proposing the adoption of the Directors' Remuneration Report was put to shareholders at the Annual General Meeting of the Company held on 9 July 2020, and was passed with 99.8% of the votes cast by shareholders voting in favour of the Resolution.
As noted in the Strategic Report, all of the Directors are nonexecutive and therefore there is no Chief Executive Officer. The Company does not have any employees. There is therefore no Chief Executive Officer or employee information to disclose.
The Directors' Remuneration Policy provides that fees payable to the Directors should reflect the time spent by the Board on the Company's affairs and the responsibilities borne by the Directors and should be sufficient to enable candidates of high calibre to be recruited. Directors are remunerated in the form of fees payable monthly in arrears, paid to the Director personally or to a specified third party. There are no long-term incentive schemes, share option schemes, pension arrangements, bonuses, or other benefits in place and fees are not specifically related to the Directors' performance, either individually or collectively.
The remuneration for the non-executive Directors is determined within the limits set out in the Company's Articles of Association. The present limit is £350,000 in aggregate per annum. The amount paid in aggregate to the Directors in 2021 is set out in the table on the following page.
A binding resolution to approve the Directors' Remuneration Policy was put to shareholders at the Annual General Meeting held in 2020, and was passed with 99.8% of shareholders voting in favour of the Resolution. The aforementioned Directors' Remuneration Policy provisions apply until the next time that they are put to shareholders for the renewal of that approval, which must be at intervals of not more than three years, or if the Directors' Remuneration Policy is varied. As approval of this policy was last granted by shareholders at the Annual General Meeting held in July 2020, shareholder approval will again be sought at the Annual General Meeting to be held in 2023.
None of the Directors has a service contract. The terms of their appointment provide that Directors shall retire and be subject to election at the first Annual General Meeting after their appointment and to re-election annually thereafter. The terms also provide that a Director may be removed without notice and that compensation will not be due on leaving office.
Following a review by the Management Engagement & Remuneration Committee it was agreed that the Directors' fees would be as follows, with effect from 1 April 2021:
The Chairman of the Company, and Humphrey van der Klugt, as Chairman of the Audit Committee, receive an annual fee of £53,150 and £41,133, respectively. Dr David Holbrook, as the Senior Independent Director, receives an annual fee of £36,007. Sarah Bates, Doug McCutcheon and Dr Bina Rawal each receive an annual fee of £33,573. Sven Borho has waived his Director's fee. These fee levels represent an increase of 4% compared to the previous year, and are considered by the Board to be appropriate given the level of work associated with the increasing size and complexity of the Company.
All of the Directors, as at the date of this report, served throughout the year. The table overleaf excludes any employer's national insurance contributions, if applicable.
The Directors are entitled to be reimbursed for reasonable expenses incurred by them in connection with the performance of their duties and attendance at Board and General Meetings.
| Date of Appointment to the Board |
Fixed fees (£) 2021 |
Taxable Expenses (£)† 2021 |
Total (£) 2021 |
% Change in Fixed fees** |
Fixed fees (£) 2020 |
Taxable Expenses (£)† 2020 |
Total (£) 2020 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sir Martin Smith | 8 November 2007 | 51,106 | – | 51,106 | 4% | 49,140 | 204 | 49,344 |
| Humphrey Van Der Klugt | 15 February 2016 | 39,551 | – | 39,551 | 4% | 38,030 | 648 | 38,678 |
| Sarah Bates | 22 May 2013 | 32,282 | – | 32,282 | 4% | 31,040 | – | 31,040 |
| Dr David Holbrook | 8 November 2007 | 34,622 | – | 34,622 | 4% | 33,290 | – | 33,290 |
| Doug McCutcheon | 7 November 2012 | 32,282 | – | 32,282 | 4% | 31,040 | – | 31,040 |
| Sven Borho* | 7 June 2018 | – | – | – | N/A | – | – | – |
| Dr Bina Rawal | 1 November 2019 | 32,282 | – | 32,282 | 4% | 12,933 | – | 12,933 |
| Total | 222,125 | – | 222,125 | 195,473 | 852 | 196,325 |
† Taxable expenses primarily comprise travel and associated expenses incurred by the Directors in attending Board and Committee meetings in London. These are reimbursed by the Company and, under HMRC Rules, are subject to tax and National Insurance and therefore are treated as a benefit in kind within this table.
* Mr Borho has waived his Director's fee.
** % change calculated on per annum entitlement.
In certain circumstances, under HMRC rules travel and other out of pocket expenses reimbursed to the Directors may be considered as taxable benefits. Where expenses are classed as taxable under HMRC guidance, they are shown in the taxable expenses column of the Directors' remuneration table along with the associated tax liability.
No communications have been received from shareholders regarding Directors' remuneration.
None of the fees referred to in the above table were paid to any third party in respect of the services provided by any of the Directors.
| Ordinary Shares of 25p each |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31 March 2021 |
31 March 2020 |
|||
| Sir Martin Smith | 11,871 | 11,871 | ||
| – Trustee | 2,725 | 2,725 | ||
| Sarah Bates | 7,200 | 7,200 | ||
| Dr David Holbrook | 1,094 | 1,094 | ||
| Sven Borho | 10,000 | 10,000 | ||
| Humphrey van der Klugt | 3,000 | 3,000 | ||
| Doug McCutcheon | 15,000 | 15,000 | ||
| Dr Bina Rawal* | 1,000 | – | ||
| 51,890 | 50,890 |
* Dr Rawal purchased a further 810 shares in the Company on 13 April 2021.
The chart below illustrates the total shareholder return for a holding in the Company's shares as compared to the Benchmark, which the Board has adopted as the key measure of the Company's performance.
Benchmark (total return) (297.3%)
Rebased to 100 as at March 2011
Source: Morningstar, Thomson Reuters and Bloomberg
The bar chart below shows the comparative cost of Directors' fees compared with the level of dividend distribution and ongoing charges for 2020 and 2021.
&QYJWSFYN[J5JWKTWRFSHJ2JFXZWJ
XJJ,QTXXFW^GJLNSSNSLTSUFLJѬ
On behalf of the Board, I confirm that the Directors' Remuneration Policy, set out on page 62 of this Annual Report, and Directors' Remuneration Report set out on page 62 to 64 summarise, as applicable, for the year to 31 March 2021:
Chairman of the Management Engagement & Remuneration Committee
3 June 2021
In our opinion, Worldwide Healthcare Trust PLC's financial statements:
We have audited the financial statements, included within the Annual Report, which comprise: the Statement of Financial Position as at 31 March 2021; the Income Statement, the Statement of Changes in Equity and the Statement of Cash Flows for the year then ended; and the notes to the financial statements, which include a description of the significant accounting policies.
Our opinion is consistent with our reporting to the Audit Committee.
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) ("ISAs (UK)") and applicable law. Our responsibilities under ISAs (UK) are further described in the Auditors' responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements section of our report. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
We remained independent of the Company in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements in the UK, which includes the FRC's Ethical Standard, as applicable to listed public interest entities, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements.
To the best of our knowledge and belief, we declare that non-audit services prohibited by the FRC's Ethical Standard were not provided.
We have provided no non-audit services to the Company in the period under audit.
As part of designing our audit, we determined materiality and assessed the risks of material misstatement in the financial statements.
Key audit matters are those matters that, in the auditors' professional judgement, were of most significance in the audit of the financial statements of the current period and include the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due to fraud) identified by the auditors, including those which had the greatest effect on: the overall audit strategy; the allocation of resources in the audit; and directing the efforts of the engagement team. These matters, and any comments we make on the results of our procedures thereon, were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.
This is not a complete list of all risks identified by our audit.
Calculation of the performance fee is a new key audit matter this year. Otherwise, the key audit matters below are consistent with last year.
Refer to page 58 (Audit Committee Report), page 80 (Principal Accounting Policies) and page 82 (Notes to the Financial Statements).
ISAs (UK) presume there is a risk of fraud in income recognition because of the pressure management may feel to achieve a certain objective. In this instance, we consider that 'income' refers to all the Company's income streams, both revenue and capital (including gains and losses on investments).
As the Company has a capital objective, there might be an incentive to overstate income in that category if capital is particularly underperforming. As such, we focussed this risk on the existence/occurrence of gains/losses on investments and completeness of dividend income recognition and its presentation in the Income Statement as set out in the requirements of The Association of Investment Companies' Statement of Recommended Practice (the "AIC SORP").
We assessed the accounting policy for income recognition for compliance with accounting standards and the AIC SORP and performed testing to confirm that income had been accounted for in accordance with this stated accounting policy.
We found that the accounting policies implemented were in accordance with accounting standards and the AIC SORP, and that income has been accounted for in accordance with the stated accounting policy.
We understood and assessed the design and implementation of key controls surrounding income recognition.
The gains/losses on investments held at fair value comprise realised and unrealised gains/losses. For unrealised gains and losses, we sample tested the valuation of the portfolio at the year-end (see below), together with testing the reconciliation of opening and closing investments. For realised gains/losses, we tested a sample of disposal proceeds by agreeing the proceeds to bank statements and we re-performed the calculation of a sample of realised gains/losses.
In addition, we tested a sample of dividend receipts by agreeing the dividend rates from all investments to independent third party sources.
To test for completeness, we tested that the appropriate dividends had been received in the year by reference to independent data of dividends declared for all listed investments during the year. Our testing did not identify any unrecorded dividends.
We tested the allocation and presentation of dividend income between the revenue and capital return columns of the Income Statement in line with the requirements set out in the AIC SORP. We did not find any special dividends that were not treated in accordance with the AIC SORP.
No material misstatements were identified from this testing.
| KEY AUDIT MATTER | HOW OUR AUDIT ADDRESSED THE KEY AUDIT MATTER |
|---|---|
| Valuation and existence of investments | |
| Refer to pages 58 (Audit Committee Report), page 79 (Accounting Policies) and page 86 (Notes to the |
We tested the valuation of all listed investments by agreeing the prices used in the valuation to independent third party sources. |
| Financial Statements). The investment portfolio at 31 March 2021 principally comprised listed equity investments and unquoted debt and equity investments which totalled £2,416,038,000. |
We tested the existence of all listed investments by agreeing the holdings of each investment to an independent confirmation from the Custodian and Prime Broker, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, as at 31 March 2021. |
| We focused on the valuation and existence of investments because investments represent the principal element of the net asset value as disclosed in the Statement of Financial Position in the financial statements. |
For unquoted investments we understood and evaluated the valuation methodology applied, by reference to the International Private Equity and Venture Capital Valuation guidelines (IPEV), and tested the techniques used by the Directors in determining the fair value of unquoted investments. Our testing, performed on a sample basis, included: |
| • assessing the appropriateness of the valuation models used; |
|
| • testing the inputs either through validation to appropriate third party sources, or where relevant, assessing the reasonableness of significant estimates and judgements used; and |
|
| • assessing the impact of COVID-19 on the valuation of investments. |
|
| We found that the Directors' valuations of unquoted investments were materially consistent with the IPEV guidelines and that the assumptions used to derive the valuations within the financial statements were reasonable based on the investee's circumstances or consistent with appropriate third party sources. No material misstatements were identified from this testing. |
|
| We tested the existence of the unquoted investment portfolio by agreeing a sample of the holdings to independently obtained third party confirmations as at 31 March 2021. No variances were identified from this testing. |
|
| Calculation of the performance fee | |
| Refer to page 57 (Audit Committee Report), page 78 (Accounting Policies) and page 80 (Notes to the Financial Statements). |
We focused on this area because the performance fee is calculated using a complex methodology as set out in the AIFM Agreement and Portfolio Management Agreement. |
| The performance fee charge for the year was £31m. | We independently recalculated the performance fee using the |
| As at 31 March 2021, there was a performance fee accrual of £31m, all of which was recognised as a provision for potential future payments. |
methodology set out in the AIFM Agreement and Portfolio Management Agreement and agreed the inputs to the calculation, including the benchmark data, to independent third party sources, where applicable. |
| No performance fees were paid in relation to outperformance achieved during the year. |
No material misstatements were identified by our testing. |
Refer to pages 4 to 6 (Chairman's Statement), page 32 (Principal Risks and Uncertainties), pages 34 and 35 (Viability Statement) and page 47 (Going Concern Statement), which disclose the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.
From a small number of cases of an unknown virus in 2019, the COVID-19 viral infection has become a global pandemic. It has caused disruption to supply chains and travel, slowed global growth and caused volatility in global markets and in exchange rates during the 2020, the first quarter of 2021 and to date.
The coronavirus impacted global capital markets significantly in 2020 and the start of 2021. The Company's net assets were £2,381,425,000 at 31 March 2021.
The Directors have prepared the financial statements of the Company on a going concern basis, and believe this assumption remains appropriate. This conclusion is based on the assessment that, notwithstanding the significant market uncertainties, they are satisfied that the Company has adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future and that the Company and its key third party service providers have in place appropriate business continuity plans and will be able to maintain service levels through the coronavirus pandemic.
We evaluated the Directors' assessment of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Company by:
We obtained and evaluated the Directors' going concern assessment.
We assessed the disclosures presented in the Annual Report in relation to COVID-19 by:
• Reading the other information, including the Principal Risks and Viability Statement set out in the Strategic Report, and assessing its consistency with the financial statements and the evidence we obtained in our audit.
Our conclusions relating to other information are set out in the 'Reporting on other information' section of our report.
Our conclusions relating to going concern are set out in the 'Conclusions relating to going concern' section below.
We tailored the scope of our audit to ensure that we performed enough work to be able to give an opinion on the financial statements as a whole, taking into account the structure of the Company, the accounting processes and controls, and the industry in which it operates.
As part of designing our audit, we determined materiality and assessed the risks of material misstatement in the financial statements. In particular, we looked at where the Directors made subjective judgements, for example in respect of significant accounting estimates that involved making assumptions and considering future events that are inherently uncertain.
The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. We set certain quantitative thresholds for materiality. These, together with qualitative considerations, helped us to determine the scope of our audit and the nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures on the individual financial statement line items and disclosures and in evaluating the effect of misstatements, both individually and in aggregate on the financial statements as a whole.
Based on our professional judgement, we determined materiality for the financial statements as a whole as follows:
Overall Company materiality – £23,600,000 (2020: £15,300,000).
How we determined it – approximately 1% of net assets.
Rationale for benchmark applied – We have applied this benchmark, a generally accepted auditing practice for investment trust audits, in the absence of indicators that an alternative benchmark would be appropriate and because we believe this provides an appropriate and consistent year-onyear basis for our audit.
We use performance materiality to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability that the aggregate of uncorrected and undetected misstatements exceeds overall materiality. Specifically, we use performance materiality in determining the scope of our audit and the nature and extent of our testing of account balances, classes of transactions and disclosures, for example in determining sample sizes. Our performance materiality was 75% of overall materiality, amounting to £17,700,000 for the Company financial statements.
In determining the performance materiality, we considered a number of factors - the history of misstatements, risk assessment and aggregation risk and the effectiveness of controls - and concluded that an amount at the upper end of our normal range was appropriate.
We agreed with the Audit Committee that we would report to them misstatements identified during our audit above £1,180,000 (2020: £765,000) as well as misstatements below that amount that, in our view, warranted reporting for qualitative reasons.
Our evaluation of the Directors' assessment of the Company's ability to continue to adopt the going concern basis of accounting included:
Based on the work we have performed, we have not identified any material uncertainties relating to events or conditions that, individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt on the Company's ability to continue as a going concern for a period of at least twelve months from when the financial statements are authorised for issue.
In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that the Directors' use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial statements is appropriate.
However, because not all future events or conditions can be predicted, this conclusion is not a guarantee as to the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.
In relation to the Directors' reporting on how they have applied the UK Corporate Governance Code, we have nothing material to add or draw attention to in relation to the Directors' statement in the financial statements about whether the Directors considered it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of accounting.
Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the Directors with respect to going concern are described in the relevant sections of this report.
The other information comprises all of the information in the Annual Report other than the financial statements and our auditors' report thereon. The Directors are responsible for the other information. Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and, accordingly, we do not express an audit opinion or, except to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in this report, any form of assurance thereon.
In connection with our audit of the financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If we identify an apparent material inconsistency or material misstatement, we are required to perform procedures to conclude whether there is a material misstatement of the financial statements or a material misstatement of the other information. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report based on these responsibilities.
With respect to the Strategic report and the Report of the Directors, we also considered whether the disclosures required by the UK Companies Act 2006 have been included.
Based on our work undertaken in the course of the audit, the Companies Act 2006 requires us also to report certain opinions and matters as described below.
In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of the audit, the information given in the Strategic report and the Report of the Directors for the year ended 31 March 2021 is consistent with the financial statements and has been prepared in accordance with applicable legal requirements.
In light of the knowledge and understanding of the Company and its environment obtained in the course of the audit, we did not identify any material misstatements in the Strategic report and the Report of the Directors.
In our opinion, the part of the Directors' Remuneration Report to be audited has been properly prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 2006.
The Listing Rules require us to review the Directors' statements in relation to going concern, longer-term viability and that part of the corporate governance statement relating to the Company's compliance with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code specified for our review. Our additional responsibilities with respect to the corporate governance statement as other information are described in the Reporting on other information section of this report.
Based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we have concluded that each of the following elements of the corporate governance statement is materially consistent with the financial statements and our knowledge obtained during the audit, and we have nothing material to add or draw attention to in relation to:
Our review of the Directors' statement regarding the longer-term viability of the group was substantially less in scope than an audit and only consisted of making inquiries and considering the Directors' process supporting their statement; checking that the statement is in alignment with
the relevant provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code; and considering whether the statement is consistent with the financial statements and our knowledge and understanding of the Company and its environment obtained in the course of the audit.
In addition, based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we have concluded that each of the following elements of the corporate governance statement is materially consistent with the financial statements and our knowledge obtained during the audit:
We have nothing to report in respect of our responsibility to report when the Directors' statement relating to the Company's compliance with the Code does not properly disclose a departure from a relevant provision of the Code specified under the Listing Rules for review by the auditors.
As explained more fully in the Statement of Directors' Responsibilities, the Directors are responsible for the preparation of the financial statements in accordance with the applicable framework and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view. The Directors are also responsible for such internal control as they determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements, the directors are responsible for assessing the Company's ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the directors either intend to liquidate
the Company or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditors' report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.
Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations. We design procedures in line with our responsibilities, outlined above, to detect material misstatements in respect of irregularities, including fraud. The extent to which our procedures are capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud, is detailed below.
Based on our understanding of the Company and industry, we identified that the principal risks of non-compliance with laws and regulations related to breaches of section 1158 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010 (see page 59 of the Annual Report), and we considered the extent to which non-compliance might have a material effect on the financial statements. We also considered those laws and regulations that have a direct impact on the financial statements such as the Companies Act 2006. We evaluated management's incentives and opportunities for fraudulent manipulation of the financial statements (including the risk of override of controls), and determined that the principal risks were related to posting inappropriate journal entries to increase revenue (investment income and capital gains) or to increase net asset value, and management bias in accounting estimates. Audit procedures performed by the engagement team included:
There are inherent limitations in the audit procedures described above. We are less likely to become aware of instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations that are not closely related to events and transactions reflected in the financial statements. Also, the risk of not detecting a material misstatement due to fraud is higher than the risk of not detecting one resulting from error, as fraud may involve deliberate concealment by, for example, forgery or intentional misrepresentations, or through collusion.
Our audit testing might include testing complete populations of certain transactions and balances, possibly using data auditing techniques. However, it typically involves selecting a limited number of items for testing, rather than testing complete populations. We will often seek to target particular items for testing based on their size or risk characteristics. In other cases, we will use audit sampling to enable us to draw a conclusion about the population from which the sample is selected.
A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements is located on the FRC's website at: www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms part of our auditors' report.
This report, including the opinions, has been prepared for and only for the Company's members as a body in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006 and for no other purpose. We do not, in giving these opinions, accept or assume responsibility for any other purpose or to any other person to whom this report is shown or into whose hands it may come save where expressly agreed by our prior consent in writing.
Under the Companies Act 2006 we are required to report to you if, in our opinion:
We have no exceptions to report arising from this responsibility.
Following the recommendation of the Audit Committee, we were appointed by the members on 14 July 2014 to audit the financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2015 and subsequent financial periods. The period of total uninterrupted engagement is 7 years, covering the years ended 31 March 2015 to 31 March 2021.
for and on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Chartered Accountants and Statutory Auditors Edinburgh
3 June 2021
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2021
| Notes | Revenue £'000 |
Capital £'000 |
2021 Total £'000 |
Revenue £'000 |
Capital £'000 |
2020 Total £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gains on investments | 9 | – | 517,267 | 517,267 | – | 96,981 | 96,981 |
| Exchange losses on currency balances | – | (6,076) | (6,076) | – | (7,077) | (7,077) | |
| Income from investments | 2 | 19,247 | – | 19,247 | 18,099 | – | 18,099 |
| AIFM, Portfolio management and performance fees |
3 | (853) | (47,963) | (48,816) | (616) | (11,696) | (12,312) |
| Other expenses | 4 | (1,338) | (155) | (1,493) | (931) | – | (931) |
| Net return before finance charges and taxation | 17,056 | 463,073 | 480,129 | 16,552 | 78,208 | 94,760 | |
| Finance costs | 5 | (20) | (379) | (399) | (93) | (1,770) | (1,863) |
| Net return before taxation | 17,036 | 462,694 | 479,730 | 16,459 | 76,438 | 92,897 | |
| Taxation on net return | 6 | (2,712) | – | (2,712) | (2,156) | 35 | (2,121) |
| Net return after taxation | 14,324 | 462,694 | 477,018 | 14,303 | 76,473 | 90,776 | |
| Return per share | 7 | 24.1p | 777.8p | 801.9p | 26.9p | 143.9p | 170.8p |
The "Total" column of this statement is the Income Statement of the Company. The "Revenue" and "Capital" columns are supplementary to this and are prepared under guidance published by The Association of Investment Companies.
All revenue and capital items in the above statement derive from continuing operations.
The Company has no recognised gains and losses other than those shown above and therefore no separate Statement of Total Comprehensive Income has been presented.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2021
| Share capital £'000 |
Capital redemption reserve £'000 |
Share premium account £'000 |
Capital reserve £'000 |
Revenue reserve £'000 |
Total shareholders' funds £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At 1 April 2020 | 13,406 | 8,221 | 418,441 | 1,079,934 | 18,296 | 1,538,298 |
| Net return after taxation | – | – | – | 462,694 | 14,324 | 477,018 |
| Second interim dividend paid in respect of year ended 31 March 2020 |
– | – | – | – | (10,512) | (10,512) |
| First interim dividend paid in respect of year ended 31 March 2021 |
– | – | – | – | (3,967) | (3,967) |
| New shares issued | 2,672 | – | 377,916 | – | – | 380,588 |
| At 31 March 2021 | 16,078 | 8,221 | 796,357 | 1,542,628 | 18,141 | 2,381,425 |
| Share capital £'000 |
Capital redemption reserve £'000 |
Share premium account £'000 |
Capital reserve £'000 |
Revenue reserve £'000 |
Total shareholders' funds £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At 1 April 2019 | 13,150 | 8,221 | 389,243 | 1,003,461 | 18,018 | 1,432,093 |
| Net return after taxation | – | – | – | 76,473 | 14,303 | 90,776 |
| Second interim dividend paid in respect of year ended 31 March 2019 |
– | – | – | – | (10,568) | (10,568) |
| First interim dividend paid in respect of year ended 31 March 2020 |
– | – | – | – | (3,457) | (3,457) |
| New shares issued | 256 | – | 29,198 | – | – | 29,454 |
| At 31 March 2020 | 13,406 | 8,221 | 418,441 | 1,079,934 | 18,296 | 1,538,298 |
AS AT 31 MARCH 2021
| Notes | 2021 £'000 |
2020 £'000 |
|---|---|---|
| Fixed assets | ||
| Investments 9 |
2,416,038 | 1,681,132 |
| Derivative – OTC swaps 9 & 10 |
18,864 | 3,452 |
| 2,434,902 | 1,684,584 | |
| Current assets | ||
| Debtors 11 |
18,172 | 14,630 |
| Cash | 29,595 | 3,810 |
| 47,767 | 18,440 | |
| Current liabilities | ||
| Creditors: amounts falling due within one year 12 |
(92,932) | (158,560) |
| Derivative – OTC swaps 9 & 10 |
(8,312) | (6,166) |
| (101,244) | (164,726) | |
| Net current (liabilities)/assets | (53,477) | (146,286) |
| Total net assets | 2,381,425 | 1,538,298 |
| Capital and reserves | ||
| Share capital 13 |
16,078 | 13,406 |
| Capital redemption reserve | 8,221 | 8,221 |
| Share premium account | 796,357 | 418,441 |
| Capital reserve 17 |
1,542,628 | 1,079,934 |
| Revenue reserve | 18,141 | 18,296 |
| Total shareholders' funds | 2,381,425 | 1,538,298 |
| Net asset value per share 14 |
3,703.0p | 2,868.9p |
The financial statements on pages 74 to 95 were approved by the Board of Directors and authorised for issue on 3 June 2021 and were signed on its behalf by:
Sir Martin Smith
Chairman
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement.
Worldwide Healthcare Trust PLC – Company Registration Number 3023689 (Registered in England)
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2021
| Notes | 2021 £'000 |
2020 £'000 |
|---|---|---|
| Net cash inflow from operating activities 18 |
931 | 2,115 |
| Purchases of investments and derivatives | (1,709,998) | (1,426,207) |
| Sales of investments and derivatives | 1,481,508 | 1,218,786 |
| Realised gain/(loss) on foreign exchange transactions | 3,205 | (7,982) |
| Net cash outflow from investing activities | (225,285) | (215,403) |
| Issue of shares 13 |
378,728 | 28,737 |
| Equity dividends paid 8 |
(14,479) | (14,025) |
| Interest paid | (399) | (1,863) |
| Net cash inflow from financing activities | 363,850 | 12,849 |
| Decrease/(Increase) in net debt | 139,496 | (200,439) |
Cash flows from operating activities include interest received of £1,265,000 (2020: £2,399,000) and dividends received of £18,907,000 (2020: £15,099,000).
| 2021 £'000 |
2020 £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Decrease/(increase) in net debt resulting from cashflows | 139,496 | (200,439) |
| (Losses)/gains on foreign currency cash and cash equivalents | (9,281) | 905 |
| Movement in net debt in the year | 130,215 | (199,534) |
| Net (debt)/cash at 1 April | (150,516) | 49,018 |
| Net debt at 31 March | (20,301) | (150,516) |
Net debt includes the bank overdraft of £49,896,000 (2020: £154,326,000) (see note 12) and cash as per the balance sheet of £29,595,000 (2020: £3,810,000).
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement.
The principal accounting policies, all of which have been applied consistently throughout the year in the preparation of these financial statements, are set out below:
These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 2006, FRS 102 'The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Ireland' ('UK GAAP') and the guidelines set out in the Statement of Recommended Practice ('SORP'), issued in October 2019, for Investment Trust Companies and Venture Capital Trusts issued by the Association of Investment Companies ('AIC'), the historical cost convention, as modified by the valuation of investments and derivatives at fair value. The Board has considered a detailed assessment of the Company's ability to meet its liabilities as they fall due, including stress and liquidity tests which modelled the effects of substantial falls in markets and significant reductions in market liquidity (including further stressing the current economic conditions caused by the coronavirus pandemic) on the Company's financial position and cash flows. Further information on the assumptions used in the stress scenarios is provided in the Audit Committee report beginning on page 57. The results of the tests showed that the Company would have sufficient cash, or the ability to liquidate a sufficient proportion of its listed holdings, to meet its liabilities as they fall due. Based on the information available to the Directors at the time of this report, including the results of the stress tests, the Company's cash balances, and the liquidity of the Company's listed investments, the Directors are satisfied that the Company has adequate financial resources to continue in operation for at least the next 12 months and that, accordingly, it is appropriate to adopt the going concern basis in preparing these financial statements.
The Company's financial statements are presented in sterling, being the functional and presentational currency of the Company. All values are rounded to the nearest thousand pounds (£'000) except where otherwise indicated.
In addition, investments and derivatives held at fair value are categorised into a fair value hierarchy based on the degree to which the inputs to the fair value measurements are observable and the significance of the inputs to the fair value measurement in its entirety, which are described as follows:
In order to reflect better the activities of an investment trust company and in accordance with the SORP, supplementary information which analyses the Income Statement between items of a revenue and capital nature has been presented alongside the Income Statement. The net revenue return is the measure the Directors believe appropriate in assessing the Company's compliance with certain requirements set out in Sections 1158 and 1159 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010.
Critical accounting judgements and key sources of estimation uncertainty used in preparing the financial information are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable. The resulting estimates will, by definition, seldom equal the related actual results.
In the course of preparing the financial statements, the only judgements that have been made in the process of applying the Company's accounting policies, are those involving the estimation of the unquoted (Level 3) investment values. The nature of estimation means that the actual outcomes could differ from those estimates, possibly significantly. The estimates relate to the investments where there is no appropriate market price i.e. the private investments. Whilst the board considers the methodologies and assumptions adopted in the valuation are supportable, reasonable and robust, because of the inherent uncertainty of valuation, those estimated values may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a ready market for the investment existed. As at 31 March 2021, there is no single key assumption used in the valuation of the unquoted investments, or other key source of estimation uncertainty, that, in the Directors' opinion has a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying values of assets and liabilities within the next financial year.
Unquoted investments are all valued in line with the accounting policy set out below.
Investments are measured under FRS 102 and are measured initially, and at subsequent reporting dates, at fair value. Investments are recognised and de-recognised at trade date where a purchase or sale is under a contract whose terms require delivery within the time frame established by the market concerned. Changes in fair value and gains or losses on disposal are included in the Income Statement as a capital item.
For quoted securities fair value is either bid price or last traded price, depending on the convention of the exchange on which the investment is listed.
Fair value is the price for which an asset could be exchanged between knowledgeable, willing parties in an arm's length transaction. In estimating the fair value of unquoted investments, the AIFM and Board apply valuation techniques which are appropriate in light of the nature, facts and circumstances of the investment, and use reasonable current market data and inputs combined with judgement and assumptions and apply these consistently. The following principles used in determining the valuation of unquoted investments, are consistent with the International Private Equity and Venture Capital Valuation ("IPEV") Guidelines. The assumptions and estimates made in determining the fair value of each unquoted investment are considered at least each six months or sooner if there is a triggering event. An example of where a valuation would be considered out of the six-month cycle is the success or failure of a drug under development to meet an anticipated outcome of its trial, announcement of the company undergoing an initial public offering, or other performance against tangible development milestones.
The primary valuation method applied in the valuation of the unquoted investments is the probability-weighted expected return method (PWERM), which considers on a probability weighted basis the future outcomes for the investment. When using the PWERM method significant judgements are made in estimating the various inputs into the model and recognising the sensitivity of such estimates. Examples of the factors where significant judgement is made include, but are not limited to, the probability assigned to potential future outcomes; discount rates; and, the likely exit scenarios for the investor company, for example, IPO or trade sale.
Where the investment being valued was itself made recently, or there has been a third party transaction in the investment, the price of the transaction may provide a good indication of fair value. Using the Price of Recent Investment technique is not a default and at each reporting date the fair value of recent investments is estimated to assess whether changes or events subsequent to the relevant transaction would imply a material change in the investment's fair value.
When using the price of a recent transaction in the valuations the Company looks to 're-calibrate' this price at each valuation point by reviewing progress within the investment, comparing against the initial investment thesis, assessing if there are any significant events or milestones that would indicate the value of the investment value has changed materially and considering whether an alternative methodology would be more appropriate.
The Company uses derivative financial instruments (namely put and call options and equity swaps).
All derivative instruments are valued initially, and at subsequent reporting dates, at fair value in the Statement of Financial Position.
The equity swaps are accounted for as Fixed Assets or Current Liabilities.
All gains and losses on over-the-counter (OTC) equity swaps are accounted for as gains or losses on investments. Where there has been a re-positioning of the swap, gains and losses are accounted for on a realised basis. All such gains and losses have been debited or credited to the capital column of the Income Statement.
Cash collateral held by counterparties is included within cash, except where there is a right of offset against the overdraft facility.
Dividends receivable are recognised on the ex-dividend date. Where no ex-dividend date is quoted, dividends are recognised when the Company's right to receive payment is established. Foreign dividends are grossed up at the appropriate rate of withholding tax, with the withholding tax recognised in the taxation charge.
Income from fixed interest securities is recognised on a time apportionment basis so as to reflect the effective interest rate. Deposit interest is accounted for on an accruals basis.
All expenses are accounted for on an accruals basis. Expenses are charged through the revenue column of the Income Statement except as follows:
Any performance fee is charged in full to the capital column of the Income Statement.
Finance costs are accounted for on an accruals basis. Finance costs are charged to the Income Statement in line with the Board's expected long-term split of returns, in the form of capital gains and income, from the Company's portfolio. As a result 5% of the finance costs are charged to the revenue column of the Income Statement and 95% are charged to the capital column of the Income Statement. Finance charges are accounted for on an accruals basis in the Income Statement using the effective interest rate method and are added to the carrying amount of the instrument to the extent that they are not settled in the period in which they arise.
The tax effect of different items of expenditure is allocated between capital and revenue using the marginal basis.
Deferred taxation is provided on all timing differences that have originated but not been reversed by the Statement of Financial Position date other than those differences regarded as permanent. This is subject to deferred tax assets only being recognised when it is probable that there will be suitable profits from which the reversal of timing differences can be deducted. Any liability to deferred tax is provided for at the rate of tax enacted or substantially enacted.
Transactions recorded in overseas currencies during the year are translated into sterling at the appropriate daily exchange rates. Assets and liabilities denominated in overseas currencies at the Statement of Financial Position date are translated into sterling at the exchange rates ruling at that date.
Any gains or losses on the translation of foreign currency balances, including the foreign currency overdraft, whether realised or unrealised, are taken to the capital or the revenue column of the Income Statement, depending on whether the gain or loss is of a capital or revenue nature.
This reserve arose when ordinary shares were redeemed by the Company and subsequently cancelled. When ordinary shares are redeemed by the Company and subsequently cancelled, an amount equal to the par value of the ordinary share capital is transferred from the ordinary share capital to the capital redemption reserve.
The following are transferred to this reserve:
This reserve can be used to distribute realised capital profits by way of dividend or share buy backs. Any gains in the fair value of investments that are not readily convertible to cash are treated as unrealised gains in the capital reserve. Distributions are only payable out of the capital reserve if capital reserves are greater than the proposed distribution and positive on the date of distribution.
The revenue reserve is distributable by way of dividend. Dividends are only payable out of the revenue reserve if revenue reserves are greater than the proposed dividend and positive on the date of distribution.
Dividends paid by the Company on its shares are recognised in the financial statements in the year in which they become payable and are shown in the Statement of Changes in Equity.
Cash comprises cash at bank and cash equivalents are short-term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value.
Bank overdrafts are considered as a component of cash and cash equivalents as they are repayable on demand and form an integral part of the Company's cash management.
| 2021 £'000 |
2020 £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Income from investments | ||
| Overseas dividends | 16,730 | 15,363 |
| Fixed interest income | 999 | 1,850 |
| UK dividends | 1,449 | 320 |
| 19,178 | 17,533 | |
| Other income | ||
| Derivatives | – | 17 |
| Deposit interest | 24 | 549 |
| Income from liquidity stocks | 45 | – |
| Total income from investments | 19,247 | 18,099 |
| Total income comprises: | ||
| Dividends | 18,179 | 15,683 |
| Interest | 1,068 | 2,416 |
| 19,247 | 18,099 |
| Revenue £'000 |
Capital £'000 |
2021 Total £'000 |
Revenue £'000 |
Capital £'000 |
2020 Total £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIFM fee | 152 | 2,892 | 3,044 | 128 | 2,425 | 2,553 |
| Portfolio management fee | 701 | 13,323 | 14,024 | 488 | 9,271 | 9,759 |
| Performance fee provision | – | 31,748 | 31,748 | – | – | – |
| 853 | 47,963 | 48,816 | 616 | 11,696 | 12,312 |
Further details on the above fees are set out in the Strategic Report on pages 28 and 29 and in the Report of the Directors on page 44.
| 2021 £'000 |
2020 £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Directors' remuneration | 222 | 195 |
| Employer's NIC on Directors' remuneration | 20 | 16 |
| Auditors' remuneration for the audit of the Company's financial statements | 49 | 41 |
| Depositary and custody fees | 177 | 184 |
| Stock Exchange listing fees* | 461 | 53 |
| Registrar fees | 48 | 47 |
| Legal and professional costs | 78 | 41 |
| Broker fees | 30 | 30 |
| Other costs | 253 | 324 |
| 1,338 | 931 | |
| Professional fees (Capital)** | 155 | – |
| 1,493 | 931 |
Details of the amounts paid to Directors are included in the Directors' Remuneration Report on page 63.
* Includes £405,000 (2020: £nil) in respect of Stock Exchange Block Listing fees required as a result of the issuance of new shares by the Company during the year.
** Professional fees in respect of acquisition of unquoted investments.
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue £'000 |
Capital £'000 |
Total £'000 |
Revenue £'000 |
Capital £'000 |
Total £'000 |
|
| Finance costs | 20 | 379 | 399 | 93 | 1,770 | 1,863 |
| 2,712 | – | 2,712 | 2,156 | (35) | 2,121 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capital gains tax | – | – | – | – | 3 | 3 |
| Overseas taxation | 2,712 | – | 2,712 | 2,118 | – | 2,118 |
| Tax relief to capital | – | – | – | 38 | (38) | – |
| Corporation tax at 19% (2020: 19%) | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Revenue £'000 |
Capital £'000 |
2021 Total £'000 |
Revenue £'000 |
Capital £'000 |
2020 Total £'000 |
Approved investment trusts are exempt from tax on capital gains made within the Company.
The tax charged for the year is lower (2020: lower) than the standard rate of corporation tax of 19% (2020: 19%).
The difference is explained below.
| Revenue £'000 |
Capital £'000 |
2021 Total £'000 |
Revenue £'000 |
Capital £'000 |
2020 Total £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net return before taxation | 17,036 | 462,694 | 479,730 | 16,459 | 76,438 | 92,897 |
| Corporation tax at 19% (2020: 19%) | 3,237 | 87,912 | 91,149 | 3,127 | 14,523 | 17,650 |
| Non-taxable gains on investments | – | (97,126) | (97,126) | – | (17,082) | (17,082) |
| Overseas withholding taxation | 2,712 | – | 2,712 | 2,118 | – | 2,118 |
| Non taxable dividends | (3,468) | – | (3,468) | (2,980) | – | (2,980) |
| Excess management expenses | 231 | 9,214 | 9,445 | (147) | 2,559 | 2,412 |
| Tax relief to capital | – | – | – | 38 | (38) | – |
| Capital gains tax | – | – | – | – | 3 | 3 |
| Total tax charge | 2,712 | – | 2,712 | 2,156 | (35) | 2,121 |
No provision for deferred taxation has been made in the current or prior year. The Company has not provided for deferred tax on capital profits and losses arising on the revaluation or disposal of investments, as it is exempt from tax on these items because of its status as an investment trust company.
The Company has not recognised a deferred tax asset of £33,851,000 (19% tax rate) (2020: £24,533,000 (19% tax rate)) as a result of excess management expenses and loan expenses. It is not anticipated that these excess expenses will be utilised in the foreseeable future.
| 2021 £'000 |
2020 £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|
| The return per share is based on the following figures: | ||
| Revenue return | 14,324 | 14,303 |
| Capital return | 462,694 | 76,473 |
| 477,018 | 90,776 | |
| Weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue during the year | 59,487,545 | 53,148,027 |
| Revenue return per ordinary share | 24.1p | 26.9p |
| Capital return per ordinary share | 777.8p | 143.9p |
| 801.9p | 170.8p |
The calculation of the total, revenue and capital return per ordinary share is carried out in accordance with IAS 33, "Earnings per Share", in accordance with the requirements of FRS 102.
Under UK Company Law, final dividends are not recognised until they are approved by shareholders and interim dividends are not recognised until they are paid. They are also debited directly from reserves. Amounts recognised as distributable in these financial statements were as follows:
| Second interim dividend in respect of the year ended 31 March 2020 First interim dividend in respect of the year ended 31 March 2021 |
10,512 3,967 |
– – |
|---|---|---|
| Second interim dividend in respect of the year ended 31 March 2019 | – | 10,568 |
| First interim dividend in respect of the year ended 31 March 2020 | – | 3,457 |
| 14,479 | 14,025 |
In respect of the year ended 31 March 2021, a first interim dividend of 6.5p per share was paid on 11 January 2021. A final dividend of 15.5p will be payable on 13 July 2021, the associated ex dividend date will be 3 June 2021. The total dividends payable in respect of the year ended 31 March 2021 amount to 22.0p per share (2020: 25.0p per share). The aggregate cost of the final dividend, based on the number of shares in issue at 2 June 2021, will be £10,085,000. In accordance with FRS 102 dividends will be reflected in the financial statements for the year in which they become payable. Total dividends in respect of the financial year, which is the basis on which the requirements of s1158 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010 are considered, are set out on the next page.
| 2021 £'000 |
2020 £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Revenue available for distribution by way of dividend for the year | 14,324 | 14,303 |
| First interim dividend in respect of the year ended 31 March 2020 | – | (3,457) |
| Second interim dividend in respect of the year ended 31 March 2020 | – | (10,512) |
| First interim dividend in respect of the year ended 31 March 2021 | (3,967) | – |
| Final dividend in respect of the year ended 31 March 2021* | (10,085) | – |
| Net retained revenue | 272 | 334 |
*based on 65,062,255 shares in issue as at 2 June 2021.
| Derivative | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quoted Investments £'000 |
Unquoted Investments £'000 |
Financial Instruments - Net £'000 |
Total £'000 |
|
| Cost at 1 April 2020 | 1,482,727 | 32,882 | – | 1,515,609 |
| Investment holdings gains/(losses) at 1 April 2020 | 170,974 | (5,451) | (2,714) | 162,809 |
| Valuation at 1 April 2020 | 1,653,701 | 27,431 | (2,714) | 1,678,418 |
| Movement in the year: | ||||
| Purchases at cost | 1,603,156 | 112,342 | – | 1,715,498 |
| Sales - proceeds | (1,464,204) | – | (20,494) | (1,484,698) |
| Transfer between levels* | 18,936 | (18,936) | – | – |
| Net movement in investment holding gains | 463,820 | 19,792 | 33,760 | 517,372 |
| Valuation at 31 March 2021 | 2,275,409 | 140,629 | 10,552 | 2,426,590 |
| Cost at 31 March 2021 | 1,887,379 | 126,577 | – | 2,013,956 |
| Investment holding gains at 31 March 2021 | 388,030 | 14,052 | 10,552 | 412,635 |
| Valuation at 31 March 2021 | 2,275,409 | 140,629 | 10,552 | 2,426,590 |
* During 2021 three unquoted investments were acquired and subsequently transferred to Level 1 following their successful initial public offerings.
The Company received £1,484,698,000 (2020: £1,219,839,000) from investments and derivatives sold in the year. The book cost of these was £1,217,151,000 (2020: £1,097,747,000). These investments and derivatives have been revalued over time and until they were sold any unrealised gains/losses were included in the fair value of the investments.
| 2021 £'000 |
2020 £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Net movement in investment holding gains in the year | 483,612 | 87,540 |
| Net movement in derivative holding gains in the year | 33,760 | 9,318 |
| Effective interest rate amortisation | (105) | 123 |
| Gains on investments | 517,267 | 96,981 |
Purchase transaction costs were £2,808,000 (2020: £1,875,000). Sales transaction costs were £1,352,000 (2020: £1,138,000). These comprise mainly commission and stamp duty.
| 10,552 | (2,714) | |
|---|---|---|
| Fair value of OTC equity swaps (liability) | (8,312) | (6,166) |
| Fair value of OTC equity swaps (asset) | 18,864 | 3,452 |
| £'000 | £'000 | |
| 2021 | 2020 |
See note 9 beginning on page 86 for movements during the year.
| 18,172 | 14,630 | |
|---|---|---|
| Prepayments and accrued income | 2,832 | 3,784 |
| VAT recoverable | 66 | 48 |
| Withholding taxation recoverable | 2,295 | 2,869 |
| Issue of own shares awaiting settlement | 2,577 | 717 |
| Amounts due from brokers | 10,402 | 7,212 |
| 2021 £'000 |
2020 £'000 |
| 2021 £'000 |
2020 £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amounts due to brokers | 6,840 | 1,340 |
| Overdraft drawn* | 49,896 | 154,326 |
| Performance fee provision | 31,748 | – |
| Other creditors and accruals | 4,448 | 2,894 |
| 92,932 | 158,560 |
*The Company's borrowing requirements are met through the utilisation of an overdraft facility provided by J.P. Morgan Securities LLC. The overdraft is drawn down in U.S. dollars. Interest on the drawn overdraft is charged at the United States Overnight Bank Funding Rate plus 45 basis points.
As described on page 93, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC may take investments up to 140% of the value of the overdrawn balance as collateral and has been granted a first priority security interest or lien over the Company's assets.
| Total shares in issue number |
||
|---|---|---|
| Issued and fully paid at 1 April 2020 | 53,619,278 | |
| New shares issued | 10,690,977 | |
| At 31 March 2021 | 64,310,255 | |
| 2021 £'000 |
2020 £'000 |
|
| Issued and fully paid: | ||
| Ordinary Shares of 25p | 16,078 | 13,406 |
During the year ended 31 March 2021 10,690,977 shares were issued raising £380,588,000. During the year ended 31 March 2020 1,024,000 shares were issued raising £29,454,000. No shares were repurchased by the Company during these years.
| 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|
| Net asset value per share | 3,703.0p | 2,868.9p |
The net asset value per share is based on the assets attributable to equity shareholders of £2,381,425,000 (2020: £1,538,298,000) and on the number of shares in issue at the year end of 64,310,255 (2020: 53,619,278).
The following are considered to be related parties:
Details of the relationship between the Company and Frostrow Capital LLP, the Company's AIFM, and OrbiMed Capital LLC, the Company's Portfolio Manager, are disclosed on pages 28 and 29 and page 44. Sven Borho, who joined the Board on 7 June 2018, is a Managing Partner at OrbiMed. Sven Borho has waived his Director's fee of £32,282 (2020: £31,040). Details of fees paid to OrbiMed by the Company can be found in note 3 on page 82. All material related party transactions have been disclosed in notes 3 and 4 on pages 82 and 83.
Details of the remuneration of all Directors can be found on page 63. Details of the Directors' interests in the capital of the Company can be found on page 63.
Three current and two former partners at OrbiMed Capital LLC have a minority financial interest totalling 20% in Frostrow Capital LLP, the Company's AIFM. Details of the fees paid to Frostrow Capital LLP by the Company can be found in note 3 on page 82.
The Company's financial instruments comprise securities and other investments, derivative instruments, cash balances, loans and debtors and creditors that arise directly from its operations.
As an investment trust, the Company invests in equities and other investments for the long term so as to secure its investment objective as stated on pages 7 and 8. In pursuing its investment objective, the Company is exposed to a variety of risks that could result in a reduction in the Company's net assets.
The main risks that the Company faces arising from its financial instruments are:
These risks, with the exception of liquidity risk, and the Directors' approach to the management of them, are set out in the Strategic Report on pages 29 to 32 and have not changed from the previous accounting year. The AIFM, in close cooperation with the Board and the Portfolio Manager, co-ordinates the Company's risk management.
As noted in the Strategic Report, on pages 8 and 10, equity swaps are used within the Company's portfolio.
More details on swaps can be found in the Glossary beginning on page 97.
The Company uses OTC equity swap positions to gain access to the Indian and Chinese markets either when it is more cost effective to gain access via swaps or to gain exposure to thematic baskets of stocks.
Details of financed swap positions* are noted in the Portfolio on page 10.
* See glossary beginning on page 97.
Swap trades and OTC derivatives are traded under ISDA† Master Agreements. The Company currently has such agreements in place with Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan.
These agreements create a right of set-off that becomes enforceable only following a specified event of default, or in other circumstances not expected to arise in the normal course of business. As the right of set-off is not unconditional, for financial reporting purposes, the Company does not offset derivative assets and derivative liabilities.
†International Swap Dealers Association Inc.
In pursuance of the Company's Investment Objective the Company's portfolio, including its derivatives, is exposed to the risk of fluctuations in market prices and foreign exchange rates.
The Board manage these risks through the use of limits and guidelines, monthly compliance reports from Frostrow and reports from Frostrow and OrbiMed presented at each Board meeting, as set out on pages 30 to 31.
The Company's gross exposure to other price risk is represented by the fair value of the investments and the underlying exposure through the derivative investments held at the year end as shown in the table below.
| 2021 | 2020 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assets £'000 |
Liabilities £'000 |
Notional* exposure £'000 |
Assets £'000 |
Liabilities £'000 |
Notional* exposure £'000 |
||
| Investments | 2,416,038 | – | 2,416,038 | 1,681,132 | – | 1,681,132 | |
| OTC equity swaps | 18,864 | (8,312) | 145,636 | 3,452 | (6,166) | 41,569 | |
| 2,434,902 | (8,312) | 2,561,674 | 1,684,584 | (6,166) | 1,722,701 |
*The notional exposure is calculated in accordance with the AIFMD requirements for calculating exposure via derivatives. See glossary beginning on page 97.
If market prices of all of the Company's financial instruments including the derivatives at the Statement of Financial Position date had been 25% higher or lower (2020: 25% higher or lower) while all other variables remained constant: the revenue return would have decreased/increased by £248,000 (2020: £166,000); the capital return would have increased by £540,385,000 (2020: £427,504,000)/decreased by £603,946,000 (2020: £427,504,000); and, the return on equity would have increased by £540,137,000 (2020: £427,504,000)/decreased by £603,698,000 (2020: £427,338,000). The calculations are based on the portfolio as at the respective Statement of Financial Position dates and are not representative of the year as a whole.
A significant proportion of the Company's portfolio and derivative positions are denominated in currencies other than sterling (the Company's functional currency, and the currency in which it reports its results). As a result, movements in exchange rates can significantly affect the sterling value of those items.
The fair values of the Company's monetary assets and liabilities that are denominated in foreign currencies are shown below.
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current assets £'000 |
Current liabilities £'000 |
Investments £'000 |
Current assets £'000 |
Current liabilities £'000 |
Investments £'000 |
|
| U.S. dollar | 72,352 | (99,943) | 2,034,533 | 50,196 | (194,080) | 1,297,338 |
| Swiss franc | 1,513 | – | 47,411 | 2,104 | – | 79,807 |
| Japanese yen | 858 | – | 42,203 | 2,782 | (259) | 123,849 |
| Hong Kong dollar | – | – | 179,407 | – | – | 152,190 |
| Other | 489 | – | 17,642 | 724 | – | 25,234 |
| 75,212 | (99,943) | 2,321,196 | 55,806 | (194,339) | 1,678,418 |
The following table details the sensitivity of the Company's net return for the year and shareholders' funds to a 10% increase and decrease in sterling against the relevant currency (2020: 10% increase and decrease).
These percentages have been determined based on market volatility in exchange rates over the previous 12 months. The sensitivity analysis is based on the Company's significant foreign currency exposures at each Statement of Financial Position date.
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USD £'000 |
YEN £'000 |
CHF £'000 |
HKD £'000 |
USD £'000 |
YEN £'000 |
CHF £'000 |
HKD £'000 |
|
| Sterling depreciates | 238,003 | 4,785 | 5,436 | 19,934 | 133,082 | 14,041 | 9,101 | 16,910 |
| Sterling appreciates | (194,730) | (3,915) | (4,448) | (16,310) | (108,885) | (11,488) | (7,446) | (13,835) |
Interest rate changes may affect:
– the interest payable on the Company's variable rate borrowings;
– the level of income receivable from floating and fixed rate securities and cash at bank and on deposit;
– the fair value of investments in fixed interest securities.
The Company's main exposure to interest rate risks is through its overdraft facility with J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, which is repayable on demand, and its holding in fixed interest securities. The exposure of financial assets and liabilities to fixed and floating interest rates, is shown below.
At 31 March 2021, the Company held 0.4% of the portfolio in securitised debt (2020: 0.7% of the portfolio). The exposure is shown in the table below.
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weighted average period for which rate is fixed Years |
Weighted average fixed interest rate % |
Fixed rate £'000 |
Floating rate £'000 |
Weighted average period for which rate is fixed Years |
Weighted average fixed interest rate % |
Fixed rate £'000 |
Floating rate £'000 |
|
| Unquoted debt investments |
3.9 | 2.6 | 6,945 | 4,486 | 4.9 | 2.6 | 4,148 | 6,803 |
| Cash | – | 40,858 | – | 20,190 | ||||
| Overdraft facility | – | (61,159) | – | (170,706) | ||||
| Financed swap positions | – | (135,084) | – | (44,283) | ||||
| 6,945 | (150,899) | 4,148 | (187,996) |
All interest rate exposures are held in U.S. dollars.
Cash of £40.9 million (2020: £20.2 million) was held as collateral against the financed swap positions, of which £11.3 million (2020: £16.4 million) was offset against the overdraft position.
If interest rates had been 1% higher or lower and all other variables were held constant, the Company's net return for the year ended 31 March 2021 and the net assets would increase/decrease by £1,531,000 (2020: increase/decrease by £1,880,000).
This is the risk that the Company will encounter difficulty in meeting obligations associated with financial liabilities.
Liquidity risk is not considered significant as the majority of the Company's assets are investments in quoted securities that are readily realisable within one week, in normal market conditions. There maybe circumstances where market liquidity is lower than normal. Stress tests have been performed to understand how long the portfolio would take to realise in such situations. The Board is comfortable that in such a situation the Company would be able to meet its liabilities as they fall due.
Contractual maturities of the financial liability exposures as at 31 March 2021, based on the earliest date on which payment can be required, are as follows:
| 2021 | 2020 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 to 12 months £'000 |
3 months or less £'000 |
3 to 12 months £'000 |
3 months or less £'000 |
||
| Overdraft facility | – | 61,159 | – | 170,706 | |
| Amounts due to brokers and accruals | – | 6,840 | – | 1,340 | |
| OTC equity swaps | 8,312 | – | 6,166 | – | |
| 8,312 | 67,999 | 6,166 | 172,046 |
£40.9m of cash held as collateral is offset against the overdraft facility in the Statement of Financial Position, as set out in Note 16(iii) above.
Credit risk is the risk of failure of a counterparty to discharge its obligations resulting in the Company suffering a financial loss.
The carrying amounts of financial assets best represent the maximum credit risk at the Statement of Financial Position date. The Company's quoted securities are held on its behalf by J.P. Morgan Securities LLC acting as the Company's Custodian and Prime Broker.
As noted on page 31, certain of the Company's assets can be held by J.P. Morgan Securities LLC as collateral against the overdraft provided by them to the Company. As at 31 March 2021 such assets held by J.P. Morgan Securities LLC are available for rehypothecation (see Glossary beginning on page 97 for further information). As at 31 March 2021, assets with a total market value of £106.9 million (2020 £248.1 million) were available to J.P. Morgan Securities LLC to be used as collateral against the overdraft facility which equates to 140% of the overdrawn position (calculated on a settled basis).
| 2021 £'000 |
2020 £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Unquoted debt investments | 11,430 | 10,951 |
| Derivative – OTC equity swaps | 18,864 | 3,452 |
| Current assets: | ||
| Other receivables (amounts due from brokers, dividends and interest receivable) | 18,172 | 14,630 |
| Cash | 29,595 | 3,810 |
Financial assets and financial liabilities are either carried in the Statement of Financial Position at their fair value (investments and derivatives) or the Statement of Financial Position amount is a reasonable approximation of fair value (due from brokers, dividends and interest receivable, due to brokers, accrual, cash at bank, bank overdraft and amounts due under the loan facility).
The Company has classified its financial assets designated at fair value through profit or loss and the fair value of derivative financial instruments using a fair value hierarchy that reflects the significance of the inputs used in making the fair value measurements. The hierarchy has the following levels:
| As of 31 March 2021 | Level 1 £'000 |
Level 2 £'000 |
Level 3 £'000 |
Total £'000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Investments held at fair value through profit or loss | 2,275,409 | – | 140,629 | 2,416,038 |
| Derivatives: OTC swaps (assets) | – | 18,864 | – | 18,864 |
| Derivatives: OTC swaps (liabilities) | – | (8,312) | – | (8,312) |
| Financial instruments measured at fair value | 2,275,409 | 10,552 | 140,629 | 2,426,590 |
As at 31 March 2021, three debt, eleven equity and a deferred consideration investment (included in the portfolio on pages 9 to 11) have been classified as level 3. All level 3 positions have been valued in accordance with the accounting policy set out in Note 1(b).
During 2021 three unquoted investments were acquired and subsequently transferred to Level 1 following their successful initial public offerings.
| As of 31 March 2020 | Level 1 £'000 |
Level 2 £'000 |
Level 3 £'000 |
Total £'000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Investments held at fair value through profit or loss | 1,653,701 | – | 27,431 | 1,681,132 |
| Derivatives: OTC swaps (assets) | – | 3,452 | – | 3,452 |
| Derivatives: OTC swaps (liabilities) | – | (6,166) | – | (6,166) |
| Financial instruments measured at fair value | 1,653,701 | (2,714) | 27,431 | 1,678,418 |
As at 31 March 2020, three debt, one equity and a deferred consideration investment have been classified as Level 3. All level 3 positions have been valued using an independent third party pricing source or using the price of a recent transaction.
The Company's capital management objectives are to ensure that it will be able to continue as a going concern and to maximise the income and capital return to its equity shareholders through an appropriate level of gearing or leverage.
The Board's policy on gearing and leverage is set out on page 8.
As at 31 March 2021, the Company had a leverage percentage of 7.6% (2020: 12.0%).
The capital structure of the Company consists of the equity share capital, retained earnings and other reserves as shown in the Statement of Financial Position on page 76.
The Board, with the assistance of the AIFM and the Portfolio Manager, monitors and reviews the broad structure of the Company's capital on an ongoing basis. This includes a review of:
The Company's objectives, policies and processes for managing capital are unchanged from the preceding accounting year.
| Capital Reserves | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other £'000 |
Investment Holding Gains* £'000 |
Total £'000 |
|||
| At 1 April 2020 | 753,902 | 326,032 | 1,079,934 | ||
| Net gains on investments | 267,388 | 249,879 | 517,267 | ||
| Expenses charged to capital less tax relief thereon | (48,497) | – | (48,497) | ||
| Exchange loss on currency balances | (6,076) | – | (6,076) | ||
| At 31 March 2021 | 966,717 | 575,911 | 1,542,628 |
*Investment holding gains relate to the revaluation of investments and derivatives held at the reporting date. (See note 9 beginning on page 86 for further details). Under the Company's Articles of Association, sums within "capital reserves – other" are also available for distribution.
| 2021 £'000 |
2020 £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Gains before finance charges and taxation | 480,129 | 94,760 |
| Less: capital gain before finance charges and taxation | (463,073) | (78,208) |
| Revenue return before finance charges and taxation | 17,056 | 16,552 |
| Expenses charged to capital | (48,118) | (11,696) |
| Decrease/(increase) in other debtors | 934 | (634) |
| Increase in provisions, and other creditors and accruals | 33,302 | 237 |
| Net taxation suffered on investment income | (2,138) | (2,467) |
| Amortisation | (105) | 123 |
| Net cash (outflow)/inflow from operating activities | 931 | 2,115 |
| Financial Year End |
|---|
| Final Results Announced |
| Annual General Meeting |
| Half Year End |
| Half Year Results Announced |
| Dividends Payable |
The Annual General Meeting of Worldwide Healthcare Trust PLC will be held at 25 Southampton Buildings, London WC2A 1AL on Thursday, 8 July 2021 from 1.00 p.m. Please refer to the Chairman's Statement on pages 4 to 6 for details of this year's arrangements.
The Company pays one final and an interim dividend in January and July each year. Shareholders who wish to have dividends paid directly into a bank account, rather than by cheque to their registered address, can complete a mandate form for the purpose. Mandates may be obtained from the Company's Registrars, Link Group, on request.
The Company's shares are listed on the London Stock Exchange under 'Investment Companies'. The price is given daily in the Financial Times and other newspapers.
Communications with shareholders are mailed to the address held on the share register. In the event of a change of address or other amendment this should be notified to the Company's Registrars, Link Group, under the signature of the registered holder.
The daily net asset value of the Company's shares can be obtained on the Company's website at www.worldwidewh. com and is published daily via the London Stock Exchange.
% of Ordinary Shares held at 31 March.
| ● Private Wealth Managers | 55.2 |
|---|---|
| ● Shares held via investment platforms | 26.0 |
| ● Mutual Funds | 8.8 |
| ● Pensions | 3.5 |
| ● Insurance | 2.7 |
| ● Retail | 0.6 |
| ● Charities | 1.1 |
| ● Fund of Funds | 1.6 |
| ● Inv Trusts | 0.1 |
| ● Corporate | 0.3 |
| ● Directors | 0.1 |
| O5WN[FYJ <jfqym2fsfljwx< th=""> | </jfqym2fsfljwx<> | |
|---|---|---|
| O8MFWJXMJQI[NFNS[JXYRJSYUQFYKTWRX | ||
| O2ZYZFQ+ZSIX | ||
| O5JSXNTSX | ||
| O.SXZWFSHJ | ||
| O7JYFNQ | ||
| O(MFWNYNJX | ||
| O+ZSITK+ZSIX | ||
| O.S[9WZXYX | ||
| O(TWUTWFYJ | ||
| O)NWJHYTWX |
Agreed by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union and transported into UK legislation, the AIFMD classifies certain investment vehicles, including investment companies, as Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs) and requires them to appoint an Alternative Investment Fund Manager (AIFM) and a depositary to manage and oversee the operations of the investment vehicle. The Board of the Company retains responsibility for strategy, operations and compliance and the Directors retain a fiduciary duty to shareholders.
An APM is a numerical measure of the Company's current, historical or future financial performance, financial position or cash flows, other than a financial measure defined or specified in the applicable financial framework. In selecting these Alternative Performance Measures, the Directors considered the key objectives and expectations of typical investors in an investment trust such as the Company.
A description of the difference between the share price and the net asset value per share. The size of the discount or premium is calculated by subtracting the share price from the net asset value per share and is usually expressed as a percentage (%) of the net asset value per share. If the share price is higher than the net asset value per share the result is a premium. If the share price is lower than the net asset value per share, the shares are trading at a discount.
An equity swap is an agreement where one party (counterparty) transfers the total return of an underlying equity position to the other party (swap holder) in exchange for a payment of the principal, and interest for financed swaps, at a set date. Total return includes dividend income and gains or losses from market movements. The exposure of the holder is the market value of the underlying equity position.
The company uses two types of equity swap:
The Company employs swaps for two purposes:
Gearing is calculated as the overdraft drawn, less net current assets (excluding dividends), divided by Net Assets, expressed as a percentage. For years prior to 2013, the calculation was based on borrowings as a percentage of Net Assets.
ISDA has created a standardised contract (the ISDA Master Agreement) which sets out the basic trading terms between the counterparties to derivative contracts.
Leverage is defined in the AIFMD as any method by which the AIFM increases the exposure of an AIF. In addition to the gearing limit the Company also has to comply with the AIFMD leverage requirements. For these purposes the Board has set a maximum leverage limit of 140% for both methods. This limit is expressed as a % with 100% representing no leverage or gearing in the Company. There are two methods of calculating leverage as follows:
The Gross Method is calculated as total exposure divided by Shareholders' Funds. Total exposure is calculated as net assets, less cash and cash equivalents, adding back cash borrowing plus derivatives converted into the equivalent position in their underlying assets.
The Commitment Method is calculated as total exposure divided by Shareholders Funds. In this instance total exposure is calculated as net assets, less cash and cash equivalents, adding back cash borrowing plus derivatives converted into the equivalent position in their underlying assets, adjusted for netting and hedging arrangements.
See the definition of Options and Equity Swaps for more details on how exposure through derivatives is calculated.
| 2021 £'000 |
2020 £'000 |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fair Value | Exposure* | Fair Value | Exposure* | |
| Investments | 2,416,038 | 2,416,038 | 1,681,132 | 1,681,132 |
| OTC equity swaps | 10,552 | 145,636 | (2,714) | 41,569 |
| 2,426,590 | 2,561,674 | 1,678,418 | 1,722,701 | |
| Shareholders' funds | 2,381,425 | 1,538,298 | ||
| Leverage % | 7.6% | 12.0% |
* Calculated in accordance with AIFMD requirements using the Commitment Method
The MSCI World Health Care Index is designed to capture the large and mid capitalisation segments across 23 developed markets countries: All securities in the index are classified as healthcare as per the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS). Developed Markets countries include: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland the UK and the U.S. The net total return of the Index is used which assumes the reinvestment of any dividends paid by its constituents after the deduction of relevant withholding taxes. The performance of the Index is calculated in U.S.\$ terms. Because the Company's reporting currency is £ the prevailing U.S.\$/£ exchange rate is applied to obtain a £ based return.
* Alternative Performance Measure
The value of the Company's assets, principally investments made in other companies and cash being held, minus any liabilities. The NAV is also described as 'shareholders' funds' per share. The NAV is often expressed in pence per share after being divided by the number of shares which have been issued. The NAV per share is unlikely to be the same as the share price which is the price at which the Company's shares can be bought or sold by an investor. The share price is determined by the relationship between the demand and supply of the shares.
The theoretical total return on shareholders' funds per share, reflecting the change in NAV assuming that dividends paid to shareholders were reinvested at NAV at the time the shares were quoted ex-dividend. A way of measuring investment management performance of investment trusts which is not affected by movements in discounts/premiums.
| 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|
| NAV Total Return | p | p |
| Opening NAV | 2,868.9 | 2,722.2 |
| Increase in NAV | 834.1 | 146.7 |
| Closing NAV | 3,703.0 | 2,868.9 |
| % increase in NAV | 29.1% | 5.4% |
| Impact of reinvested dividends | 0.9% | 1.1% |
| NAV Total Return | 30.0% | 6.5% |
Ongoing charges are calculated by taking the Company's annualised ongoing charges, excluding finance costs, taxation, performance fees and exceptional items, and expressing them as a percentage of the average daily net asset value of the Company over the year.
| 2021 £'000 |
2020 £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|
| AIFM & Portfolio Management fees (Note 3) | 17,068 | 12,312 |
| Other Expenses – Revenue (Note 4) | 1,338 | 931 |
| Total Ongoing Charges | 18,406 | 13,243 |
| Performance fees paid/crystallised | – | – |
| Total | 18,406 | 13,243 |
| Average net assets | 2,112,164 | 1,497,219 |
| Ongoing Charges | 0.9% | 0.9% |
| Ongoing Charges (including performance fees paid or crystallised during the year) | 0.9% |
Rehypothecation is the practice by banks and brokers of using, for their own purposes, assets that have been posted as collateral by clients.
Return to the investor on mid-market prices assuming that all dividends paid were reinvested.
| 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|
| Share Price Total Return | p | p |
| Opening share price | 2,920.0 | 2,730.0 |
| Increase in share price | 775.0 | 190.0 |
| Closing share price | 3,695.0 | 2,920.0 |
| % increase in share price | 26.5% | 7.0% |
| Impact of reinvested dividends | 0.9% | 1.0% |
| Share Price Total Return | 27.4% | 8.0% |
* Alternative Performance Measure
The Company currently conducts its affairs so that its shares can be recommended by Independent Financial Advisers (IFAs) in the UK to ordinary retail investors in accordance with the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) rules in relationship to nonmainstream investment procedures and intends to continue to do so. The shares are excluded from the FCA's restrictions which apply to non-mainstream investment products because they are shares in an investment trust.
The Company's shares are traded openly on the London Stock Exchange and can be purchased through a stock broker or other financial intermediary. The shares are available through savings plans (including Investment Dealing Accounts, ISAs, Junior ISAs and SIPPs) which facilitate both regular monthly investments and lump sum investments in the Company's shares. There are a number of investment platforms that offer these facilities. A list of some of them, that is not comprehensive nor constitutes any form of recommendation, can be found below:
| AJ Bell Youinvest | http://www.youinvest.co.uk/ |
|---|---|
| Barclays Smart Investor | https://www.smartinvestor.barclays.co.uk/ |
| Bestinvest | http://www.bestinvest.co.uk/ |
| Charles Stanley Direct | https://www.charles-stanley-direct.co.uk/ |
| Halifax Share Dealing | https://www.halifaxsharedealing-online.co.uk/ |
| Hargreaves Lansdown | http://www.hl.co.uk/ |
| HSBC | https://www.hsbc.co.uk/investments/ |
| iDealing | http://www.idealing.com/ |
| Interactive Investor | http://www.iii.co.uk/ |
| IWEB | http://www.iweb-sharedealing.co.uk/share-dealing-home.asp |
| The Share Centre | https://www.share.com/ |
Notice is hereby given that the Annual General Meeting of Worldwide Healthcare Trust PLC will be held at 25 Southampton Buildings, London WC2A 1AL on Thursday, 8 July 2021 from 1.00 p.m. for the following purposes:
To consider and, if thought fit, pass the following as ordinary resolutions:
To consider and, if thought fit, pass the following resolutions of which resolutions 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17 will be proposed as special resolutions:
("Shares") are proportionate (as nearly as may be) to the respective numbers of Shares held by them but subject to such exclusions or other arrangements in connection with the issue as the Directors may consider necessary, appropriate or expedient to deal with equity securities representing fractional entitlements or to deal with legal or practical problems arising in any overseas territory, the requirements of any regulatory body or stock exchange, or any other matter whatsoever;
(b) provided that (otherwise than pursuant to sub-paragraph (a) above) this power shall be limited to the allotment of equity securities up to an aggregate nominal value of £1,626,556 , being 10% of the issued share capital of the Company as at 2 June 2021 and representing 6,506,225 Shares or, if changed, the number representing 10% of the issued share capital of the Company at the date of the meeting at which this resolution is passed, and provided further that (i) the number of equity securities to which this power applies shall be reduced from time to time by the number of treasury shares which are sold pursuant to any power conferred on the Directors by resolution 14 set out in the Notice of Annual General Meeting and (ii) no allotment of equity securities shall be made under this power which would result in Shares being issued at a price which is less than the net asset value per Share as at the latest practicable date before such allotment of equity securities as determined by the Directors in their reasonable discretion; and
and such power shall expire at the conclusion of the next Annual General Meeting of the Company after the passing of this resolution or 15 months from the date of passing this resolution, whichever is earlier, unless previously revoked, varied or renewed by the Company in General Meeting and provided that the Company shall be entitled to make, prior to the expiry of such authority, an offer or agreement which would or might otherwise require equity securities to be allotted after such expiry and the Directors may allot equity securities pursuant to such offer or agreement as if the power conferred hereby had not expired.
and such power shall expire at the conclusion of the next Annual General Meeting of the Company after the passing of this resolution or 15 months from the date of passing this resolution, whichever is earlier, unless previously revoked, varied or renewed by the Company in General Meeting and provided that the Company shall be entitled to make, prior to the expiry of such authority, an offer or agreement which would or might otherwise require treasury shares to be sold after such expiry and the Directors may sell treasury shares pursuant to such offer or agreement as if the power conferred hereby had not expired.
By order of the Board Registered Office:
Company Secretary
3 June 2021
One Wood Street Frostrow Capital LLP London EC2V 7WS
In the case of a member which is a company, the revocation notice must be executed under its common seal or signed on its behalf by an officer of the company or an attorney for the company. Any power of attorney or any other authority under which the revocation notice is signed (or a duly certified copy of such power of attorney) must be included with the revocation notice. If a member attempts to revoke their proxy appointment but the revocation is received after the time for receipt of proxy appointments (see above) then, subject to paragraph 4 on page 105, the proxy appointment will remain valid.
The Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2021 will be presented to the Annual General Meeting (AGM). These accounts accompany this Notice of Meeting.
The rationale for the payment of a final dividend is set out in the Chairman's Statement beginning on page 4 and the Report of the Directors on page 45.
Resolution 3 seeks shareholder approval of the Company's dividend policy, which is set out on page 27.
Resolutions 4 to 9 deal with the re-election of each Director. Biographies of each of the Directors can be found on pages 41 to 43 of the annual report.
The Board has confirmed, following a performance review, that the Directors standing for re-election and election continue to perform effectively.
Resolution 10 relates to the re-appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company's independent Auditors to hold office until the next AGM of the Company and also authorises the Audit Committee to set their remuneration.
The Directors' Remuneration Report is set out in full in the annual report on pages 62 to 64.
Ordinary Resolution 12 in the Notice of AGM will renew the authority to allot the unissued share capital up to an aggregate nominal amount of £1,626,255 (equivalent to 6,506,225 shares, or 10% of the Company's existing issued share capital on 2 June 2021, being the nearest practicable date prior to the signing of this Report (or if changed, the number representing 10% of the issued share capital of the Company at the date at which the resolution is passed). Such authority will expire on the date of the next AGM or after a period of 15 months
from the date of the passing of the resolution, whichever is earlier. This means that the authority will have to be renewed at the next AGM.
When shares are to be allotted for cash, Section 551 of the Companies Act 2006 (the "Act") provides that existing shareholders have pre-emption rights and that the new shares must be offered first to such shareholders in proportion to their existing holding of shares. However, shareholders can, by special resolution, authorise the Directors to allot shares otherwise than by a pro rata issue to existing shareholders. Special Resolution 12 will, if passed, give the Directors power to allot for cash equity securities up to 10% of the Company's existing share capital on 2 June 2021 (or if changed, the number representing 10% of the issued share capital of the Company at the date at which the resolution is passed), as if Section 551 of the Act does not apply. This is the same nominal amount of share capital which the Directors are seeking the authority to allot pursuant to Resolution 12. This authority will also expire on the date of the next Annual General Meeting or after a period of 15 months, whichever is earlier. This authority will not be used in connection with a rights issue by the Company.
Under the Companies (Acquisition of Own Shares) (Treasury Shares) Regulations 2003 (as amended) (the "Treasury Share Regulations") the Company is permitted to buy-back and hold shares in treasury and then sell them at a later date for cash, rather than cancelling them. The Treasury Share Regulations require such sale to be on a pre-emptive, pro rata, basis to existing shareholders unless shareholders agree by special resolution to disapply such pre-emption rights. Accordingly, in addition to giving the Directors power to allot unissued share capital on a non pre-emptive basis pursuant to Resolution 13, Resolution 14, if passed, will give the Directors authority to sell shares held in treasury on a non pre-emptive basis. No dividends may be paid on any shares held in treasury and no voting rights will attach to such shares. The benefit of the ability to hold treasury shares is that such shares may be resold. This should give the Company greater flexibility in managing its share capital, and improve liquidity in its shares. It is the intention of the Board that any re-sale of treasury shares would only take place at a premium to the cum income net asset value per share. It is also the intention of the Board that sales from treasury would only take place when the Board believes that to do so would assist in the provision
of liquidity to the market. The number of treasury shares which may be sold pursuant to this authority is limited to 10% of the Company's existing share capital on 2 June 2021 (or if changed, the number representing 10% of the issued share capital of the Company at the date at which the resolution is passed) (reduced by any equity securities allotted for cash on a non-pro rata basis pursuant to Resolution 13, as described above). This authority will also expire on the date of the next Annual General Meeting or after a period of 15 months, whichever is earlier.
The Directors intend to use the authority given by Resolutions 12, 13 and 14 to allot shares and disapply pre-emption rights only in circumstances where this will be clearly beneficial to shareholders as a whole. The issue proceeds would be available for investment in line with the Company's investment policy. No issue of shares will be made which would effectively alter the control of the Company without the prior approval of shareholders in general meeting.
New Shares will only be issued at a premium to the Company's cum income net asset value per share at the time of issue.
The Directors wish to renew the authority given by shareholders at the previous AGM. The principal aim of a share buy-back facility is to enhance shareholder value by acquiring shares at a discount to net asset value, as and when the Directors consider this to be appropriate. The purchase of Shares, when they are trading at a discount to net asset value per share should result in an increase in the net asset value per share for the remaining shareholders. This authority, if conferred, will only be exercised if to do so would result in an increase in the net asset value per share for the remaining shareholders and if it is in the best interests of shareholders generally. Any purchase of shares will be made within guidelines established from time to time by the Board. It is proposed to seek shareholder authority to renew this facility for another year at the AGM.
Under the current Listing Rules, the maximum price that may be paid on the exercise of this authority must not exceed the higher of (i) 105% of the average of the middle market quotations for the shares over the five business days immediately preceding the date of purchase and (ii) the higher of the last independent trade and the highest current independent bid on the trading venue where the purchase is carried out. The minimum price which may be paid is 25p per Share. Existing shares which are purchased under this authority will either be cancelled or held as Treasury Shares.
Special Resolution 15 in the Notice of AGM will renew the authority to purchase in the market a maximum of 14.99% of Ordinary Shares in issue as at the date of the passing of the resolution. Such authority will expire on the date of the next AGM or after a period of 15 months from the date of passing of the resolution, whichever is earlier. This means in effect that the authority will have to be renewed at the next AGM or earlier if the authority has been exhausted.
Special Resolution 15 seeks shareholder approval for the Company to hold General Meetings (other than the AGM) at 14 clear days' notice. The Board confirms that the shorter notice period would only be used where it was merited by the purpose of the meeting.
Special Resolution 17 seeks shareholder approval to adopt new Articles of Association in substitution for and to the exclusion of the existing Articles of Association. Details of the changes are set out on page 111 of this Annual Report.
The Board considers that the resolutions relating to the above items are in the best interests of shareholders as a whole. Accordingly, the Board unanimously recommends to the shareholders that they vote in favour of the above resolutions to be proposed at the forthcoming AGM as the Directors intend to do in respect of their own beneficial holdings totalling 49,165 shares.
A description of the investment strategy and objectives of the Company, the types of assets in which the Company may invest, the techniques it may employ, any applicable investment restrictions, the circumstances in which it may use leverage, the types and sources of leverage permitted and the associated risks, any restrictions on the use of leverage and the maximum level of leverage which the AIFM and Portfolio Manager are entitled to employ on behalf of the Company and the procedures by which the Company may change its investment strategy and/or the investment policy can be found on pages 7 and 8 under the heading "Investment Strategy".
The table below sets out the current maximum permitted limit and actual level of leverages for the Company: as a percentage of net assets
| Gross Method |
Commitment Method |
|
|---|---|---|
| Maximum level of leverage | 140.0% | 140.0% |
| Actual level at 31 March 2021 | 109.3% | 107.6% |
Following completion of an assessment of the application of the proportionality principle to the FCA's AIFM Remuneration Code, the AIFM has disapplied the pay-out process rules with respect to it and any of its delegates. This is because the AIFM considers that it carries out noncomplex activities and is operating on a small scale.
Further disclosures required under the AIFM Rules can be found within the Investor Disclosure Document on the Company's website: www.worldwidewh.com.
As defined in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) 2015/2365, securities financing transactions (SFT) include repurchase transactions, securities or commodities lending and securities or commodities borrowing, buy-sell back transactions or sell-buy back transactions and margin lending transactions. Whilst the Company does not engage in such SFT's, it does engage in Total Return Swaps (TRS) therefore, in accordance with Article 13 of the Regulation, the Company's involvement in and exposure to Total Return Swaps for the accounting year ended 31 March 2021 are detailed below.
The following table represents the total value of assets engaged in TRS:
| £'000 | % of AUM | |
|---|---|---|
| TRS | 10,552 | 0.4 |
The following table provides details of the counterparties and their country of incorporation (based on gross volume of outstanding transactions with exposure on a gross basis) in respect of TRS as at the balance sheet date:
| Country of Incorporation |
£'000 | |
|---|---|---|
| Goldman Sachs | U.S.A. | 84,288 |
| JPMorgan | U.S.A. | 61,348 |
No collateral was received by the Company in respect of TRS during the year to 31 March 2021. The collateral provided by the Company to the above counterparties is set out below.
| Type | Currency | Maturity | Quality | £'000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash | USD | less than | n/a | 40,858 |
| 1 day |
The following table provides an analysis of the maturity tenor of open TRS positions (with exposure on a gross basis) as at the balance sheet date:
| TRS | |
|---|---|
| Value | |
| Maturity | £'000 |
| 1 to 3 months | 23,705 |
| 3 to 12 months | 121,931 |
OTC derivative transactions (including TRS) are entered into by the Company under an International Swaps and Derivatives Associations, Inc. Master Agreement ("ISDA Master Agreement"). An ISDA Master Agreement is a bilateral agreement between the Company and a counterparty that governs OTC derivative transactions (including TRS) entered into by the parties. All OTC derivative transactions entered under an ISDA Master Agreement are netted together for collateral purposes, therefore any collateral disclosures provided are in respect of all OTC derivative transactions entered into by the Company under the ISDA Master agreement, not just total return swaps.
There was no non-cash collateral provided by the Company in respect of OTC derivatives (including TRS) with the counterparties noted above as at the statement of financial position date.
All returns from TRS transactions will accrue to the Company and are not subject to any returns sharing arrangements with the Company's AIFM, Portfolio Manager or any other third parties. Returns from those instruments are disclosed in Note 9 to the Company's financial statements.
Sir Martin Smith (Chairman) Sarah Bates Sven Borho Dr David Holbrook (Senior Independent Director and Chairman of the Nominations Committee) Humphrey van der Klugt, FCA (Chairman of the Audit
Committee) Doug McCutcheon (Chairman of the Management Engagement & Remuneration Committee) Dr Bina Rawal
3023689 (Registered in England)
The Company is an investment company as defined under Section 833 of the Companies Act 2006
Website: www.worldwidewh.com
One Wood Street London EC2V 7WS
Frostrow Capital LLP 25 Southampton Buildings, London WC2A 1AL Telephone: 0203 008 4910 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.frostrow.com
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority
If you have an enquiry about the Company or if you would like to receive a copy of the Company's monthly fact sheet by e-mail, please contact Frostrow Capital using the above e-mail address.
OrbiMed Capital LLC 601 Lexington Avenue, 54th Floor New York NY 10022 Website: www.orbimed.com
Registered under the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission
J.P. Morgan Europe Limited 25 Bank Street London E14 5JP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Atria One 144 Morrison Street Edinburgh EH3 8EX
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC Suite 1, Metro Tech Roadway Brooklyn, NY 11201 USA
Link Group 10th Floor Central Square 29 Wellington Street Leeds LS1 4DL E-mail: [email protected] Telephone (in UK): 0371 664 0300† Telephone (from overseas): + 44 371 664 0300† Shareholder Portal: www.signalshares.com Website: www.linkgroup.eu
Please contact the Registrars if you have a query about a certificated holding in the Company's shares.
† Calls are charged at the standard geographic rate and will vary by provider. Calls outside the UK are charged at the applicable international rate. Lines are open between 09.00 and 17.30 Monday to Friday excluding public holidays in England and Wales.
Winterflood Securities Limited The Atrium Building Cannon Bridge, 25 Dowgate Hill London EC4R 2GA
The price of your shares can be found in various publications including the Financial Times, The Daily Telegraph, The Times and The Scotsman.
The Company's net asset value per share is announced daily and is available, together with the share price, on the TrustNet website at www.trustnet.com.
| Shares: | SEDOL | : | 0338530 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISIN | : | GB0003385308 | ||
| BLOOMBERG | : | WWH LN | ||
| EPIC | : | WWH | ||
| Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act ("FATCA) | ||||
| Global Intermediary Identification | ||||
| Number (GIIN) | : | FIZWRN.99999.SL.826 | ||
| Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) | : | 5493003YBCY4W1IMJU04 |
Set out below is a summary of the main differences between the current and the proposed new Articles of Association (the "New Articles"). The principal changes in the New Articles to be adopted at the Annual General Meeting to be held on Thursday, 8 July 2021 relate to:
The Company is proposing to amend the Articles of Association to allow for hybrid meetings and in exceptional circumstances virtual meetings. These amendments are being sought in response to challenges posed as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, which have significantly restricted attendance of shareholders at physical general meetings and the resultant increase in use of remote working technology.
The New Articles permit the Company to hold general meetings (including annual general meetings) where shareholders are not required to attend in person but may attend and participate virtually. A meeting can be wholly virtual if attendees participate only by way of electronic means or a meeting may be "hybrid", where some attendees are based in a single physical location and others attend electronically. Certain consequential changes to facilitate this amendment have been made throughout the New Articles.
The Board is committed to ensuring that, under normal circumstances, general meetings (including annual general meetings) will incorporate a physical meeting where shareholders can meet with the Board in person.
Other technical changes have been made so that the Articles of Association conform to other legislation applicable to companies, as currently in force and current best practice, in particular changes have been made to provisions designed to enable the Company to comply with its obligations under various tax reporting requirements.
A copy of the current Articles and of the proposed New Articles marked up to show the proposed amendments will be available for inspection at the offices of Frostrow Capital LLP (25 Southampton Buildings London WC2A 1AL) during normal business hours and will be available for inspection at the Annual General Meeting, in each case until conclusion of the meeting. A copy will also be available on the Company's website at www.worldwidewh.com.
25 Southampton Buildings London WC2A 1AL
www.worldwidewh.com
Copies of this annual report and other documents issued by the Company are available from the Company Secretary. If needed, copies can be made available in a variety of formats, including Braille, audio tape or larger type as appropriate. You can contact the Registrar to the Company, Link Group, which has installed telephones to allow speech and hearing impaired people who have their own telephone to contact them directly, without the need for an intermediate operator, for this service please call 0800 731 1888. Specially trained operators are available during normal business hours to answer queries via this service. Alternatively, if you prefer to go through a 'typetalk' operator (provided by the RNID) you should dial 18001 followed by the number you wish to dial.
A member of the Association of Investment Companies
This report is printed on Revive 100% White Silk a totally recycled paper produced using 100% recycled waste at a mill that has been awarded the ISO 14001 certificate for environmental management.
The pulp is bleached using a totally chlorine free (TCF) process. This report has been produced using vegetable based inks.
Building tools?
Free accounts include 100 API calls/year for testing.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.