AI assistant
Workspace Group PLC — Investor Presentation 2013
Jun 24, 2013
5282_ip_2013-06-24_5c9f479f-d19e-44d1-bc06-0c85e8e81b04.pdf
Investor Presentation
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
INVESTOR AND ANALYST PRESENTATION 11 JUNE 2013
WORKSPACE RESULTS 2013 DRIVING VALUE
WORKSPACE
Jamie Hopkins Chief Executive Officer
PERFORMANCE
Graham Clemett Chief Financial Officer
DIRECTION
Jamie Hopkins Chief Executive Officer
QUESTIONS
Repositioned the business
Repositioning the portfolio
POSITIONED FOR GROWTH
Repositioned the balance sheet
| March 2013 | March 2012 | Change | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strong Growth | ||||
| Rent Roll (lfl) | £45.5m | £41.7m | +9% | |
| Valuation | £830m | £760m | +8%* | |
| EPRA NAV (per share) | £3.48 | £3.08 | +13% | |
| Trading Profit after Interest | £17.9m | £16.0m | +12% | |
| Operational Momentum | ||||
| Enquiries (per month) | 1,037 | 1,009 | +3% | |
| Occupancy (lfl) | 89.8% | 87.7% | Up 2.1% | |
| Rent per sq. ft (lfl) |
£13.75 | £12.90 | +7% | |
| Dividend (per share) | 9.7p | 8.8p | +10% | |
* Underlying increase
PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS
| March 2013 | March 2012 | Change | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net Rental income | £47.1m | £44.8m | +5% | |
| Trading Profit After Interest | £17.9m | £16.0m | +12% | |
| Profit Before Tax | £76.4m | £48.5m | +58% | |
| Dividend Per Share | 9.7p | 8.8p | +10% | |
| EPRA Net Asset Value Per Share | £3.48 | £3.08 | +13% | |
| Like-for-like Net Initial Yield | 7.3% | 7.2% | - | |
| Total Property Return (IPD) | 13.8% | 13.4% | - | |
| Loan to Value | 40% | 41% | - | |
| Average Interest Cost | 5.0% | 5.1% | - |
PERFORMANCE TRADING PROFIT AFTER INTEREST
PERFORMANCE LFL OCCUPANCY & RENT ROLL TRENDS
PERFORMANCE REFURBISHMENT PROJECTS
| Projects | Current Value* |
Current Rent Roll* |
Total Cost |
Cost to Complete |
Upgraded Space |
New Space |
Potential Future Rent** |
Uplift in Rent |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Completed | 4 | £23m | £0.7m | £12m | - | 33,000 | 58,000 | £1.9m | + £1.2m |
| Underway | 4 | £49m | £1.9m | £30m | £19m | 140,000 | 72,000 | £5.2m | + £3.3m |
| Design Stage | 6 | £31m | £1.7m | £51m | £51m | 34,000 | 225,000 | £6.8m | + £5.1m |
* At 31 March 2013
** See Appendix I
PERFORMANCE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
| Projects | Current Value* |
Current Rent Roll* |
Residential Units |
New Business Space |
Potential Future Rent** |
Other | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Underway | 4 | £73m | £0.3m | 693 | 189,000 | £3.8m | £22m cash + overage |
| With Planning |
3 | £43m | £1.8m | 1,238 | 142,000 | - | - |
| Planning Stage |
5 | £45m | £2.1m | 1,075 | 205,000 | - | - |
* At 31 March 2013
** See Appendix II
PERFORMANCE REFURBISHMENT & REDEVELOPMENT RENT ROLL PROJECTION
Underway - Redevelopment Underway - Refurbishment Completed - Refurbishment
PERFORMANCE PROPERTY VALUATION
PERFORMANCE CASH FLOW
| £m | ||
|---|---|---|
| Trading | ||
| Net cash from operations | 22 | |
| Dividends paid | (13) | 9 |
| Investment | ||
| Capital Expenditure | (29) | |
| Joint Venture Investments | (8) | (20) |
| Disposals/Capital Receipts | 17 | |
| Financing | ||
| Retail Bond Issue | 58 | |
| Repayment of bank borrowings | (58) | (1) |
| Bond Issue Costs | (1) | |
| Other | (2) | |
| Net movement in year | (14) | |
| Net Debt at March 2012 | (314) | |
| Net Debt at March 2013 | (328) |
| March 2013 | Impact of Refinancing |
Pro-forma | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Facilities | £383m | +£27m | £410m |
| Facility headroom (including cash) | £55m | +£27m | £82m |
| Term to Maturity (average) | 2.9 Years | +4.9 Years | 7.8 Years |
| Average Interest Cost | 5.0% | +0.4% | 5.4% |
| Loan to Value | 40% | - | 40% |
| Facilities by type: | |||
| Secured | £325m | (£325m) | - |
| Unsecured | £58m | +£352m | £410m |
PERFORMANCE PROFORMA DEBT PROFILE
PERFORMANCE EPRA NAV PER SHARE
| At 31 March 2013 | CORE | OTHER | TOTAL | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Like-for like | Refurbishment Redevelopment | Like-for-like | |||
| Number of properties | 47 | 8 | 10 | 21 | 86 |
| Valuation | £509m | £110m | £155m | £56m | £830m |
| Revaluation surplus in year | £36m | £4m | £20m | -£1m | £59m |
| Net initial yield | 7.3% | 7.8% | 6.9% | ||
| Rent per square foot | £12.98 | ||||
| Capital value per square foot |
£177 | ||||
| Disposals in Year | |||||
| Number of properties | 6 | ||||
| Proceeds | £13m | ||||
| Under offer | £8m |
WORKSPACE
90% LETTINGS DONE IN-HOUSE
467,000 website visits 14,000 phone calls 10,000 sq ft of billboards
EVENTS
75 customer networking events 3,000 attendees
CUSTOMER SURVEYS
82% customers satisfaction 86% of customers would recommend
OPPORTUNITY
350,000 PRIVATE SECTOR ENTERPRISES IN LONDON
97% OF THIS SECTOR ARE SMALL BUSINESSES
ENTREPRENEURIAL ACTIVITY IN LONDON IS HIGHEST OF ANY REGION
STRATEGY
MAXIMISE PENETRATION
HEAT MAPPING
SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMISATION
PPC (PAY PER CLICK) EFFICIENCY
TRACKING AND FOLLOW UP
SOCIAL MEDIA STRATEGY
RESULT
INCREASE INCOME DATA AND KNOWLEDGE INTIMATE UNDERSTANDING
CAPTURE GROWTH London factor: Supply Customer growth: Demand Drive income: Trends positive
DRIVE GROWTH Leverage operations and brand Selective acquisitions and disposals Benefit from London residential market
CONFIDENT OUTLOOK Strong and flexible balance sheet Progressive dividend policy Positioned for growth: Focused, energetic and challenging approach
APPENDIX I
Refurbishment Projects
| Project Stage | March 2013 Valuation |
Expected Cost |
Cost to Complete |
Completion | Upgraded area | New area | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expected Area |
Expected ERV |
Expected Area |
Expected ERV |
||||||
| Completed / Letting | |||||||||
| Canalot Studios |
£5m | - | Sept 2012 | 32,702 | £26 | 16,268 | £30 | £1.2m | |
| Whitechapel | £2m | - | Oct 2012 | - | - | 6,532 | £22 | £0.1m | |
| Chester House phase 2 | £2m | - | March 2013 | - | - | 8,903 | £34 | £0.3m | |
| Leyton l (phase 1) | £3m | - | April 2013 | - | - | 26,600 | £11 | £0.3m | |
| £23m | £12m | - | 32,702 | 58,303 | £1.9m | ||||
| Construction | |||||||||
| Exmouth House | £4m | £1m | H1 2013 | 52,000 | £27 | 5,000 | £38 | £1.4m | |
| Westminster (phase 1) | £2m | £1m | H1 2013 | 6,000 | £27 | 4,750 | £30 | £0.3m | |
| The Pill Box | £9m | £6m | H1 2014 | - | - | 42,000 | £24 | £0.9m | |
| Metal Box Factory | £15m | £11m | H2 2014 | 82,000 | £26 | 20,000 | £38 | £2.6m | |
| £49m | £30m | £19m | 140,000 | 71,750 | £5.2m | ||||
| Design | |||||||||
| Bounds Green | £2m | 2014 | - | - | 13,000 | £11 | £0.1m | ||
| Baldwins Gardens |
£17m | 2015 | - | - | 65,000 | £40 | £2.3m | ||
| Barley Mow Centre | £11m | 2015 | - | - | 42,000 | £28 | £1.1m | ||
| Leyton (phase 2) | £4m | 2015 | - | - | 35,000 | £12 | £0.4m | ||
| Linton House | £4m | 2015 | 34,000 | £28 | 15,000 | £38 | £1.4m | ||
| Westminster (phase 2) | £14m | 2015 | - | - | 55,000 | £30 | £1.5m | ||
| £31m | £51m | 34,000 | 225,000 | £6.8m |
APPENDIX II
Redevelopment Projects
| Project Stage | Development partner |
31 March 2013 Expected Valuation completion units |
Residential | Commercial space | Other proceeds | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | Area | Rent*. | Cash | Overage | |||||
| Construction | |||||||||
| Screenworks | Taylor Wimpey | H1 2014 | 72 | 61,000 | £1.4m | £4.8m | | ||
| Wandsworth (phase 1) |
Mount Anvil | H2 2014 | 209 | 53,000 | £1.0m | - | | ||
| Grand Union | Taylor Wimpey | H1 2015 | 145 | 60,000 | £1.2m | £5.9m | | ||
| Bow (phase 1) | Peabody | H2 2015 | 267 | 15,000 | £0.2m | £11.5m | | ||
| £73m | 693 | 189,000 | £3.8m | £22.2m | |||||
| With Planning | |||||||||
| Faircharm | 2015-2016 | 148 | 52,000 | ||||||
| Bow (phase2) | 2016 | 290 | 30,000 | ||||||
| Tower Bridge Development | 2015-2018 | 800 | 60,000 | ||||||
| £43m | 1,238 | 142,000 | |||||||
| Planning Stage | |||||||||
| Cremer Street (student housing) | 203 | 45,000 | |||||||
| Highway | 130 | 33,000 | |||||||
| Marshgate | 300 | 35,000 | |||||||
| Poplar | 392 | 77,000 | |||||||
| Wandsworth (phase 2) |
50 | 15,000 | |||||||
| £45m | 1,075 | 205,000 |
*Expected rent at 90% occupancy
This presentation contains forward looking statements. Although the Group believes that the estimates and assumptions on which such statements are based are reasonable, they are inherently uncertain and involve a number of risks and uncertainties that are beyond the Group's control. The Group does not make any representation or warranty that the results anticipated by such forward looking statements will be achieved and this presentation should not be relied upon as a guide to future performance.