Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

WELLTOWER INC. Interim / Quarterly Report 2011

May 10, 2011

29851_10-q_2011-05-10_56b2537d-5453-4490-8031-c6f419395788.zip

Interim / Quarterly Report

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

xbrl,dc

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011

/xbrl,dc

or

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File number 1-8923

HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter )

Delaware 34-1096634
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
4500 Dorr Street, Toledo, Ohio 43615
(Address of principal executive office) (Zip Code)

(419) 247-2800

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to the filing requirements for at least the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer þ
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

As of April 30, 2011, the registrant had 176,757,398 shares of common stock outstanding.

Folio /Folio

PAGEBREAK

TOC

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Consolidated Balance Sheets — March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 3
Consolidated Statements of Income — Three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 4
Consolidated Statements of Equity — Three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — Three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 6
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements 7
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 23
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 48
Item 4. Controls and Procedures 49
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A. Risk Factors 49
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds 49
Item 5. Other Information 49
Item 6. Exhibits 50
Signatures 51
EX-3.1
EX-12
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32.1
EX-32.2
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

/TOC

Folio 2 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

xbrl,bs

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS xbrl,body HEALTH CARE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

March 31, — 2011 2010
(Unaudited) (Note)
(In thousands)
Assets
Real estate investments:
Real property owned:
Land and land improvements $ 819,622 $ 727,050
Buildings and improvements 8,707,973 7,627,132
Acquired lease intangibles 347,620 258,079
Real property held for sale, net of accumulated depreciation 71,126 23,441
Construction in progress 353,812 356,793
Gross real property owned 10,300,153 8,992,495
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization (867,050 ) (836,966 )
Net real property owned 9,433,103 8,155,529
Real estate loans receivable:
Real estate loans receivable 447,351 436,580
Less allowance for losses on loans receivable (1,524 ) (1,276 )
Net real estate loans receivable 445,827 435,304
Net real estate investments 9,878,930 8,590,833
Other assets:
Equity investments 250,111 237,107
Goodwill 51,207 51,207
Deferred loan expenses 48,620 32,960
Cash and cash equivalents 2,667,995 131,570
Restricted cash 38,722 79,069
Receivables and other assets 322,459 328,988
Total other assets 3,379,114 860,901
Total assets $ 13,258,044 $ 9,451,734
Liabilities and equity
Liabilities:
Borrowings under unsecured line of credit arrangement $ — $ 300,000
Senior unsecured notes 4,427,850 3,034,949
Secured debt 1,711,973 1,125,906
Captial lease obligations 8,813 8,881
Accrued expenses and other liabilities 334,259 244,345
Total liabilities 6,482,895 4,714,081
Redeemable noncontrolling interests 4,546 4,553
Equity:
Preferred stock 1,010,417 291,667
Common stock 176,563 147,155
Capital in excess of par value 6,280,906 4,932,468
Treasury stock (13,480 ) (11,352 )
Cumulative net income 1,708,248 1,676,196
Cumulative dividends (2,538,601 ) (2,427,881 )
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (10,295 ) (11,099 )
Other equity 6,383 5,697
Total Health Care REIT, Inc. stockholders’ equity 6,620,141 4,602,851
Noncontrolling interests 150,462 130,249
Total equity 6,770,603 4,733,100
Total liabilities and equity $ 13,258,044 $ 9,451,734

NOTE: The consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2010 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements

/xbrl,bs

Folio 3 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

xbrl,in

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME xbrl,body (UNAUDITED) HEALTH CARE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Three Months Ended
March 31,
2011 2010
(In thousands, except per share data)
Revenues:
Rental income $ 169,658 $ 135,333
Resident fees and services 71,286 —
Interest income 11,709 9,048
Other income 2,824 996
Total revenues 255,477 145,377
Expenses:
Interest expense 58,897 28,425
Property operating expenses 64,485 12,513
Depreciation and amortization 73,476 40,652
Transaction costs 36,065 7,714
General and administrative 17,714 16,821
Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt — 18,038
Provision for loan losses 248 —
Total expenses 250,885 124,163
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
and income from unconsolidated joint ventures 4,592 21,214
Income tax (expense) benefit (129 ) (84 )
Income from unconsolidated joint ventures 1,543 768
Income from continuing operations 6,006 21,898
Discontinued operations:
Gain (loss) on sales of properties 26,156 6,718
Impairment of assets (202 ) —
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net (150 ) 3,078
Discontinued operations, net 25,804 9,796
Net income 31,810 31,694
Less: Preferred stock dividends 8,680 5,509
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to
noncontrolling interests (1) (242 ) 373
Net income attributable to common stockholders $ 23,372 $ 25,812
Average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic 154,945 123,270
Diluted 155,485 123,790
Earnings per share:
Basic:
Income from continuing operations
attributable to common stockholders $ (0.02 ) $ 0.13
Discontinued operations, net 0.17 0.08
Net income attributable to common stockholders* $ 0.15 $ 0.21
Diluted:
Income from continuing operations
attributable to common stockholders $ (0.02 ) $ 0.13
Discontinued operations, net 0.17 0.08
Net income attributable to common stockholders* $ 0.15 $ 0.21
Dividends declared and paid per common share $ 0.69 $ 0.68
* Amounts may not sum due to rounding
(1) Includes amounts attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests.

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements

/xbrl,in

Folio 4 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

xbrl,se

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY xbrl,body (UNAUDITED) HEALTH CARE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
Accumulated
Capital in Other
Preferred Common Excess of Treasury Cumulative Cumulative Comprehensive Other Noncontrolling
(in thousands) Stock Stock Par Value Stock Net Income Dividends Income (Loss) Equity Interests Total
Balances at beginning of period $ 291,667 $ 147,155 $ 4,932,468 $ (11,352 ) $ 1,676,196 $ (2,427,881 ) $ (11,099 ) $ 5,697 $ 130,249 $ 4,733,100
Comprehensive income:
Net income (loss) 32,052 (250 ) 31,802
Other comprehensive income:
Unrealized gain (loss)
on equity investments 322 322
Cash flow hedge activity 482 482
Total comprehensive income 32,606
Contributions by noncontrolling interests 6,017 27,486 33,503
Distributions to noncontrolling interests (7,023 ) (7,023 )
Amounts related to issuance of common stock
from dividend reinvestment and stock
incentive plans, net of forfeitures 658 34,486 (2,128 ) (353 ) 32,663
Proceeds from issuance of common stock 28,750 1,329,944 1,358,694
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock 718,750 (22,009 ) 696,741
Option compensation expense 1,039 1,039
Cash dividends paid:
Common stock cash dividends (102,040 ) (102,040 )
Preferred stock cash dividends (8,680 ) (8,680 )
Balances at end of period $ 1,010,417 $ 176,563 $ 6,280,906 $ (13,480 ) $ 1,708,248 $ (2,538,601 ) $ (10,295 ) $ 6,383 $ 150,462 $ 6,770,603
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
Accumulated
Capital in Other
Preferred Common Excess of Treasury Cumulative Cumulative Comprehensive Other Noncontrolling
Stock Stock Par Value Stock Net Income Dividends Income (Loss) Equity Interests Total
Balances at beginning of period $ 288,683 $ 123,385 $ 3,900,666 $ (7,619 ) $ 1,547,669 $ (2,057,658 ) $ (2,891 ) $ 4,804 $ 10,412 $ 3,807,451
Comprehensive income:
Net income (loss) 31,321 373 31,694
Other comprehensive income:
Unrealized gain (loss)
on equity investments 90 90
Cash flow hedge activity (1,291 ) (1,291 )
Total comprehensive income 30,493
Contributions by noncontrolling interests 1,359 1,359
Distributions to noncontrolling interests (2,462 ) (2,462 )
Amounts related to issuance of common stock
from dividend reinvestment and stock
incentive plans, net of forfeitures 577 24,044 (3,684 ) (238 ) 20,699
Conversion of preferred stock (709 ) 17 692 —
Equity component of convertible debt (8,565 ) (8,565 )
Option compensation expense 973 973
Cash dividends paid:
Common stock cash dividends (84,523 ) (84,523 )
Preferred stock cash dividends (5,509 ) (5,509 )
Balances at end of period $ 287,974 $ 123,979 $ 3,916,837 $ (11,303 ) $ 1,578,990 $ (2,147,690 ) $ (4,092 ) $ 5,539 $ 9,682 $ 3,759,916

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements

/xbrl,se

Folio 5 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

xbrl,cf

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS xbrl,body (UNAUDITED) HEALTH CARE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Three Months Ended
March 31,
2011 2010
(In thousands)
Operating activities
Net income $ 31,810 $ 31,694
Adjustments to reconcile net income to
net cash provided from (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 74,768 43,581
Other amortization expenses 4,338 3,414
Provision for loan losses 248 —
Impairment of assets 202 —
Stock-based compensation expense 5,593 7,550
Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt — 18,038
Income from unconsolidated joint ventures (1,543 ) (768 )
Rental income in excess of cash received (1,418 ) (2,715 )
Amortization related to above (below) market leases, net (658 ) (487 )
Loss (gain) on sales of properties (26,156 ) (6,718 )
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses and other liabilities 57,901 5,824
Decrease (increase) in receivables and other assets (29,973 ) (6,925 )
Net cash provided from (used in) operating activities 115,112 92,488
Investing activities
Investment in real property, net of cash acquired (684,677 ) (161,811 )
Capitalized interest (4,665 ) (7,076 )
Investment in real estate loans receivable (23,112 ) (11,151 )
Other investments, net of payments (2,815 ) (114 )
Principal collected on real estate loans receivable 12,341 4,666
Contributions to unconsolidated joint ventures (602 ) (159,981 )
Distributions from unconsolidated joint ventures 980 —
Decrease in restricted cash 45,797 5,545
Proceeds from sales of real property 44,048 38,059
Net cash provided from (used in) investing activities (612,705 ) (291,863 )
Financing activities
Net increase (decrease) under unsecured lines of credit arrangements (300,000 ) 285,000
Proceeds from issuance of senior unsecured notes 1,381,086 335,212
Payments to extinguish senior unsecured notes — (342,394 )
Payments on secured debt (5,906 ) (3,378 )
Net proceeds from the issuance of common stock 1,388,118 17,791
Net proceeds from the issuance of preferred stock 696,741 —
Decrease (increase) in deferred loan expenses (8,339 ) (639 )
Contributions by noncontrolling interests (1) 95 1,359
Distributions to noncontrolling interests (1) (7,057 ) (2,462 )
Cash distributions to stockholders (110,720 ) (90,032 )
Net cash provided from (used in) financing activities 3,034,018 200,457
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 2,536,425 1,082
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 131,570 35,476
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 2,667,995 $ 36,558
Supplemental cash flow information:
Interest paid $ 35,081 $ 25,215
Income taxes paid 31 94

(1) Includes amounts attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests.

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements

/xbrl,cf

Folio 6 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

xbrl,ns

HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

xbrl,n

1. Business

xbrl,body

Health Care REIT, Inc., an S&P 500 company with headquarters in Toledo, Ohio, is an equity real estate investment trust (“REIT”) that invests in senior housing and health care real estate. Our full service platform also offers property management and development services to our customers. As of March 31, 2011, our broadly diversified portfolio consisted of 727 properties in 44 states. Founded in 1970, we were the first real estate investment trust to invest exclusively in health care facilities. More information is available on our website at www.hcreit.com.

xbrl,n

2. Accounting Policies and Related Matters

xbrl,body xbrl,dnap,"Organization Consolidation And Presentation Of Financial Statements Disclosure"

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and with instructions to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2011 are not necessarily an indication of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2011. For further information, refer to the financial statements and footnotes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

/xbrl,dnap xbrl,dnap,"Schedule Of New Accounting Pronouncements And Changes In Accounting Principles"

New Accounting Standards

In April 2011, FASB issued ASU No. 2011-02, A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring (“TDR”). It intended to provide additional guidance to assist creditors in determining whether a restructuring of a receivable meets the criteria to be considered a troubled debt restructuring. The amendments in this ASU are effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after June 15, 2011, and are to be applied retrospectively to the beginning of the annual period of adoption. As a result of applying these amendments, an entity may identify receivables that are newly considered impaired. Early adoption is permitted. We are continuing to evaluate the impact of adoption of this ASU.

/xbrl,dnap xbrl,n

3. Real Property Acquisitions and Development

xbrl,body

Silverado Partnership

During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we completed the formation of our partnership with Silverado Senior Living, Inc. to own and operate a portfolio of 18 combination senior housing and care communities located in California, Texas, Arizona and Utah. We own a 95.4% partnership interest and Silverado owns the remaining 4.6% interest and continues to manage the communities. The partnership owns and operates six communities previously owned by us and 12 additional communities previously owned by Silverado. The transaction took advantage of the structure authorized by the REIT Investment Diversification and Empowerment Act of 2007 (“RIDEA”). The results of operations for this partnership have been included in our consolidated results of operations beginning as of January 1, 2011 and are a component of our senior housing operating segment. Consolidation is based on a combination of ownership interest and operational decision-making control authority.

In conjunction with the formation of the partnership, we contributed $163,368,000 of cash and the six properties previously owned by us. Silverado contributed the remaining 12 properties to the partnership and the secured debt relating to these properties in exchange for their 4.6% interest in the partnership. The six properties are recorded at their historical carrying values and the noncontrolling interest was established based on such values. The difference between the fair value of the consideration received relating to these properties and the historical allocation of the 4.6% noncontrolling interest was recorded in capital in excess of par value. The total purchase price for the 12 communities acquired has been allocated to the tangible and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities based upon their respective fair values in accordance with the company’s accounting policies. Such allocations have not been finalized as we await final asset valuations and, as such, the allocation of the purchase consideration included in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31, 2011 is preliminary and subject to adjustment. The 4.6% noncontrolling interest relating to the acquired 12 properties is also reflected at estimated fair value. The weighted average useful life of the acquired intangibles was 6.2 years as of March 31, 2011. The following table presents the preliminary allocation of the purchase price to assets acquired and liabilities assumed, based on their estimated fair values (in thousands):

Folio 7 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

xbrl

HEALTH CARE REIT, INC. NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

xbrl,dn,"Estimated Fair Value Of Allocated Purchase Price Of Asset And Liabilities"

Land and land improvements $
Buildings and improvements 173,841
Acquired lease intangibles 19,305
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiary 14,960
Cash and cash equivalents 4,084
Total assets acquired 223,360
Secured debt 60,667
Total liabilities assumed 60,667
Capital in excess of par 6,017
Noncontrolling interests 7,836
Net assets acquired $ 148,840

/xbrl,dn

Benchmark Partnership

During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we completed the formation of our partnership with Benchmark Senior Living to own and operate a portfolio of 34 senior housing communities located in New England. We own a 95% partnership interest and Benchmark owns the remaining 5% interest and continues to manage the communities. The 34 communities included in the partnership were previously owned by The GPT Group and Benchmark. The transaction took advantage of the structure authorized by RIDEA. The results of operations for this partnership have been included in our consolidated results of operations beginning as of March 28, 2011 and are a component of our senior housing operating segment. Consolidation is based on a combination of ownership interest and operational decision-making control authority.

In conjunction with the formation of the partnership, we contributed $380,278,000 of cash and the partnership assumed the secured debt relating to these properties. Benchmark contributed the 34 properties to the partnership and the secured debt relating to these properties in exchange for their 5% interest in the partnership. The total purchase price for the communities acquired has been allocated to the tangible and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities based upon their respective fair values in accordance with the company’s accounting policies. Such allocations have not been finalized as we await final asset valuations and, as such, the allocation of the purchase consideration included in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31, 2011 is preliminary and subject to adjustment. The 5% noncontrolling interest relating to the acquired properties is also reflected at estimated fair value. The weighted average useful life of the acquired intangibles was approximately 1.5 years as of March 31, 2011. The following table presents the preliminary allocation of the purchase price to assets acquired and liabilities assumed, based on their estimated fair values (in thousands):

xbrl,dn,"Estimated Fair Value Of Allocated Purchase Price Of Asset And Liabilities"

Land and land improvements $
Buildings and improvements 792,394
Acquired lease intangibles 68,980
Cash and cash equivalents 28,258
Restricted cash 5,451
Total assets acquired 955,523
Secured debt 524,989
Accrued expenses and other liabilities 17,412
Entrance fee liability 13,269
Total liabilities assumed 555,670
Noncontrolling interests 19,575
Net assets acquired $ 380,278

/xbrl,dn

Real Property Investment Activity

The following is a summary of our real property investment activity for the periods presented (in thousands):

Folio 8 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

xbrl

HEALTH CARE REIT, INC. NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

xbrl,dn,"Summary Of Investment Holdings Schedule Of Investments"

March 31, 2011 March 31, 2010
Properties Amount Properties Amount
Real property acquisitions:
Senior housing operating 46 $ 1,126,130 — $ —
Senior housing triple-net 7 113,364 — —
Medical facilities — — 17 223,152
Land parcels 1 9,396 — —
Total acquisitions 54 1,248,890 17 223,152
Less: Assumed debt (592,711 ) (108,244 )
Assumed other items, net (71,788 ) (31,048 )
Cash disbursed for acquisitions 584,391 83,860
Construction in progress additions:
Senior housing triple-net 31,893 27,445
Medical facilities 82,590 54,597
Total construction in progress additions 114,483 82,042
Less: Capitalized interest (4,665 ) (7,076 )
Accruals (1) (19,130 ) (4,475 )
Cash disbursed for construction in progress 90,688 70,491
Capital improvements to existing properties 9,598 7,460
Total cash invested in real property $ 684,677 $ 161,811

/xbrl,dn

(1) Represents non-cash accruals for amounts to be paid in future periods relating to properties that converted in the period noted above.

The following is a summary of the construction projects that were placed into service and began generating revenues during the periods presented:

xbrl,dn,"Summary Of Construction Projects Placed Into Service And Generating Revenues"

Three Months Ended — March 31, 2011 March 31, 2010
Development projects:
Senior housing triple-net $ — $ 149,075
Medical facilities 105,940 13,652
Total development projects 105,940 162,727
Expansion projects 11,524 1,298
Total construction in progress conversions $ 117,464 $ 164,025

/xbrl,dn

Transaction costs for the three months ended March 31, 2011 primarily represent costs incurred with the Genesis (see Note 18), Silverado and Benchmark transactions (including due diligence costs, fees for legal and valuation services, and termination of a pre-existing relationship computed based on the fair value of the assets acquired), lease termination fees and costs incurred in connection with the new property acquisitions.

Folio 9 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

xbrl

HEALTH CARE REIT, INC. NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

xbrl,n

4. Real Estate Intangibles

xbrl,body

The following is a summary of our real estate intangibles, excluding those classified as held for sale, as of the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):

xbrl,dn,"Schedule Of Real Estate Intangibles Excluding Held For Sale"

March 31, 2011
Assets:
In place lease intangibles $ 270,121 $ 182,030
Above market tenant leases 24,084 24,089
Below market ground leases 46,992 46,992
Lease commissions 6,423 4,968
Gross historical cost 347,620 258,079
Accumulated amortization (64,455 ) (49,145 )
Net book value $ 283,165 $ 208,934
Weighted-average amortization period in years 15.5 18.2
Liabilities:
Below market tenant leases $ 57,127 $ 57,261
Above market ground leases 5,020 5,020
Gross historical cost 62,147 62,281
Accumulated amortization (17,366 ) (15,992 )
Net book value $ 44,781 $ 46,289
Weighted-average amortization period in years 12.6 14.0

/xbrl,dn xbrl,n

5. Dispositions, Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations

xbrl,body

During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we sold 14 senior housing triple-net properties for net gains of $26,156,000. At March 31, 2011, we had one medical facility and 18 senior housing triple-net facilities that satisfied the requirements for held for sale treatment and such properties were properly recorded at the lesser of their estimated fair values less costs to sell or carrying values. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we recorded an impairment charge of $202,000 related to two senior housing triple-net facilities to adjust the carrying values to estimated fair values less costs to sell based on current sales price expectations. The following is a summary of our real property disposition activity for the periods presented (in thousands):

xbrl,dn,"Summary Of Real Property Disposition Activity"

Three Months Ended — March 31, 2011 March 31, 2010
Real property dispositions:
Senior housing triple-net $ 17,892 $ 25,097
Medical facilities — 6,244
Total dispositions 17,892 31,341
Add: Gain on sales of real property 26,156 6,718
Proceeds from real property sales $ 44,048 $ 38,059

/xbrl,dn

We have reclassified the income and expenses attributable to all properties sold and attributable to properties held for sale at March 31, 2011 to discontinued operations. Expenses include an allocation of interest expense based on property carrying values and our weighted average cost of debt. The following illustrates the reclassification impact as a result of classifying properties as discontinued operations for the periods presented (in thousands):

Folio 10 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

xbrl

HEALTH CARE REIT, INC. NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

xbrl,dn,"Reclassification Impact As Result Of Classifying Properties As Discontinued Operations"

Three Months Ended
March 31,
2011 2010
Revenues:
Rental income $ 2,404 $ 8,774
Expenses:
Interest expense 433 1,560
Property operating expenses 829 1,207
Provision for depreciation 1,292 2,929
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net $ (150 ) $ 3,078

/xbrl,dn xbrl,n

6. Real Estate Loans Receivable

xbrl,body

The following is a summary of our real estate loan activity for the periods presented (in thousands):

xbrl,dn,"Summary Of Real Estate Loan Activity"

Three Months Ended
March 31, 2011 March 31, 2010
Senior Housing Medical Senior Housing Medical
Triple-net Facilities Totals Triple-net Facilities Totals
Advances on real estate loans receivable:
Investments in new loans $ 11,807 $ — $ 11,807 $ 634 $ — $ 634
Draws on existing loans 8,824 2,481 11,305 10,517 — 10,517
Net cash advances on real estate loans 20,631 2,481 23,112 11,151 — 11,151
Receipts on real estate loans receivable:
Loan payoffs 7,607 — 7,607 1,599 — 1,599
Principal payments on loans 2,653 2,081 4,734 3,067 — 3,067
Total receipts on real estate loans 10,260 2,081 12,341 4,666 — 4,666
Net advances (receipts) on real estate loans $ 10,371 $ 400 $ 10,771 $ 6,485 $ — $ 6,485

/xbrl,dn

We recorded $248,000 of provision for loan losses during the three months ended March 31, 2011, resulting in an allowance for loan losses of $1,524,000 relating to real estate loans with outstanding balances of $9,478,000, all of which were on non-accrual status at March 31, 2011.

xbrl,n

7. Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures

xbrl,body

During the six months ended June 30, 2010, we entered into a joint venture investment with Forest City Enterprises (NYSE:FCE.A and FCE.B). We acquired a 49% interest in a seven-building life science campus located in University Park in Cambridge, MA, which is immediately adjacent to the campus of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Six buildings closed on February 22, 2010 and the seventh closed on June 30, 2010. The portfolio is 100% leased. In connection with these transactions, we invested $174,692,000 of cash which is recorded as an equity investment on the balance sheet. Our share of the non-recourse secured debt assumed by the joint venture was approximately $156,729,000 with weighted-average interest rates of 7.1%. The aggregate remaining unamortized basis difference of our investment in this joint venture of $12,992,000 at March 31, 2011 is primarily attributable to real estate and related intangible assets and will be amortized over the life of the related properties and included in the reported amount of income from unconsolidated joint ventures.

In December 2010, we entered into a strategic joint venture relationship with a national medical office building company. In connection with this transaction, we invested $21,321,000 of cash which is recorded as an equity investment on the balance sheet. Our share of the non-recourse secured debt assumed by the joint venture was approximately $24,609,000 with weighted-average interest rates of 6.06%. The aggregate remaining unamortized basis difference of our investment in this joint venture of $1,531,000 at March 31, 2011 is primarily attributable to real estate and related intangible assets and will be amortized over the life of the related properties and included in the reported amount of income from unconsolidated joint ventures.

In addition, in January 2011, we completed the formation of a partnership with Silverado Senior Living, Inc. See Note 3 for additional information.

The results of operations for these investments have been included in our consolidated results of operations from the date of acquisition by the joint venture and are reflected in our income statement as income from unconsolidated joint ventures.

Folio 11 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

xbrl

HEALTH CARE REIT, INC. NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

xbrl,n

8. Customer Concentration

xbrl,body

The following table summarizes certain information about our customer concentration as of March 31, 2011 (dollars in thousands):

xbrl,dn,"Summary Of Customer Concentration"

Properties (2) Total — Investment (2) Percent of — Investment (3)
Concentration by investment: (1)
Benchmark Senior Living 34 $ 923,506 9 %
Merrill Gardens LLC 38 720,947 7 %
Brandywine Senior Living, LLC 19 608,847 6 %
Senior Living Communities, LLC 12 601,303 6 %
Senior Star Living 10 461,969 5 %
Remaining portfolio 601 6,563,882 67 %
Totals 714 $ 9,880,454 100 %

/xbrl,dn

| (1) | All of our top five customers are in our senior housing operating segment, except for
Brandywine and Senior Living, which are in our senior housing triple-net segment. |
| --- | --- |
| (2) | Excludes our share of unconsolidated joint venture investments. Please see Note 7 for
additional information. |
| (3) | Investments with our top five customers comprised 32% of total investments at December 31,
2010. |

xbrl,n

9. Borrowings Under Line of Credit Arrangement and Related Items

xbrl,body

At March 31, 2011, we had an unsecured line of credit arrangement with a consortium of sixteen banks in the amount of $1,150,000,000. On January 24, 2011, we provided notice to KeyBank National Association, as administrative agent, of our desire to extend the line of credit. Under the terms of the loan agreement, we had the right to extend the revolving line of credit for one year if we were in compliance with all covenants and paid an extension fee of $1,725,000. As a result of the extension, the line of credit will now expire on August 6, 2012. Borrowings under the agreement are subject to interest payable in periods no longer than three months at either the agent bank’s prime rate of interest or the applicable margin over LIBOR interest rate, at our option (0.85% at March 31, 2011). The applicable margin is based on certain of our debt ratings and was 0.6% at March 31, 2011. In addition, we pay a facility fee annually to each bank based on the bank’s commitment amount. The facility fee depends on certain of our debt ratings and was 0.15% at March 31, 2011. We also pay an annual agent’s fee of $50,000. Principal is due upon expiration of the agreement.

The following information relates to aggregate borrowings under the unsecured line of credit arrangement for the periods presented (dollars in thousands):

xbrl,dn,"Aggregate Borrowings Under Unsecured Line Of Credit Arrangement"

Three Months Ended March 31, — 2011 2010
Balance outstanding at quarter end $ — $ 425,000
Maximum amount outstanding at any month end $ 495,000 $ 425,000
Average amount outstanding (total of daily
principal balances divided by days in period) $ 319,222 $ 283,111
Weighted average interest rate (actual interest
expense divided by average borrowings
outstanding) 1.59 % 1.47 %

/xbrl,dn xbrl,n

10. Senior Unsecured Notes and Secured Debt

xbrl,body

We have $4,427,850,000 of senior unsecured notes with annual stated interest rates ranging from 3.00% to 8.00%. The carrying amounts of the senior unsecured notes represent the par value of $4,464,930,000 adjusted for any unamortized premiums or discounts and other basis adjustments related to hedging the debt with derivative instruments. See Note 11 for further discussion regarding derivative instruments.

During the three months ended December 31, 2006, we issued $345,000,000 of 4.75% senior unsecured convertible notes due December 2026. The notes are convertible, in certain circumstances, into cash and, if applicable, shares of common stock at an initial conversion rate of 20.8833 shares per $1,000 principal amount of notes, which represents an initial conversion price of approximately $47.89 per share. In general, upon conversion, the holder of each note would receive, in respect of the conversion value of such note, cash up to the principal amount of such note and common stock for the note’s conversion value in excess of such principal amount. In addition, on each of December 1, 2011, December 1, 2016 and December 1, 2021, holders may require us to purchase all or a portion of their notes at a purchase price in cash equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be purchased, plus any accrued and unpaid interest. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, we extinguished $5,000,000 of these notes and recognized a gain of

Folio 12 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

xbrl

HEALTH CARE REIT, INC. NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

$446,000. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, we extinguished $214,412,000 of these notes, recognized a loss of $8,837,000 and paid $18,552,000 to reacquire the equity component of convertible debt. As of March 31, 2011, we had $125,588,000 of these notes outstanding.

In July 2007, we issued $400,000,000 of 4.75% senior unsecured convertible notes due July 2027. The notes are convertible, in certain circumstances, into cash and, if applicable, shares of our common stock at an initial conversion rate of 20.0000 shares per $1,000 principal amount of notes, which represents an initial conversion price of approximately $50.00 per share. In general, upon conversion, the holder of each note would receive, in respect of the conversion value of such note, cash up to the principal amount of such note and common stock for the note’s conversion value in excess of such principal amount. In addition, on each of July 15, 2012, July 15, 2017 and July 15, 2022, holders may require us to purchase all or a portion of their notes at a purchase price in cash equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be purchased, plus any accrued and unpaid interest. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, we extinguished $5,000,000 of these notes and recognized a gain of $594,000. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, we extinguished $226,914,000 of these notes, recognized a loss of $16,235,000 and paid $21,062,000 to reacquire the equity component of convertible debt. As of March 31, 2011, we had $168,086,000 of these notes outstanding.

During the year ended December 31, 2010, we issued $494,403,000 of 3.00% senior unsecured convertible notes due December 2029. The notes are convertible, in certain circumstances, into cash and, if applicable, shares of common stock at an initial conversion rate of 19.5064 shares per $1,000 principal amount of notes, which represents an initial conversion price of approximately $51.27 per share. In general, upon conversion, the holder of each note would receive, in respect of the conversion value of such note, cash up to the principal amount of such note and common stock for the note’s conversion value in excess of such principal amount. In addition, on each of December 1, 2014, December 1, 2019 and December 1, 2024, holders may require us to purchase all or a portion of their notes at a purchase price in cash equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be purchased, plus any accrued and unpaid interest. In connection with this issuance, we recognized $29,925,000 of equity component of convertible debt.

During the three months ended June 30, 2010, we issued $450,000,000 of 6.125% senior unsecured notes due 2020, generating net proceeds of $446,328,000. During the three months ended September 30, 2010, we issued $450,000,000 of 4.70% senior unsecured notes due 2017, generating net proceeds of $445,768,000. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we issued $400,000,000 of 3.625% senior unsecured notes due 2016, $600,000,000 of 5.25% senior unsecured notes due 2022 and $400,000,000 of 6.50% senior unsecured notes due 2041, generating net proceeds of $1,381,086,000.

We have secured debt totaling $1,711,973,000, collateralized by owned properties, with annual interest rates ranging from 3.86% to 10.00%. The carrying amounts of the secured debt represent the par value of $1,691,706,000 adjusted for any unamortized fair value adjustments on loan assumptions. The carrying values of the properties securing the debt totaled $2,807,594,000 at March 31, 2011. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we assumed $106,140,000 of first mortgage loans principal with an average rate of 7.35% secured by 17 medical office buildings. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we assumed $563,829,000 of first mortgage loans principal with an average rate of 5.412% secured by 27 senior housing properties.

Our debt agreements contain various covenants, restrictions and events of default. Certain agreements require us to maintain certain financial ratios and minimum net worth and impose certain limits on our ability to incur indebtedness, create liens and make investments or acquisitions. As of March 31, 2011, we were in compliance with all of the covenants under our debt agreements.

At March 31, 2011, the annual principal payments due on these debt obligations are as follows (in thousands):

xbrl,dn,"Schedule Of Debt Instruments"

Senior — Unsecured Notes (1) Secured — Debt (1) Totals
2011 $ — $ 19,761 $ 19,761
2012 76,853 185,766 262,619
2013 300,000 105,111 405,111
2014 — 184,690 184,690
2015 250,000 164,793 414,793
Thereafter 3,838,077 1,031,585 4,869,662
Totals $ 4,464,930 $ 1,691,706 $ 6,156,636

/xbrl,dn

(1) Amounts represent principal amounts due and do not include unamortized premiums/discounts or other fair value adjustments as reflected on the balance sheet.

Folio 13 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

xbrl

HEALTH CARE REIT, INC. NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

xbrl,n

11. Derivative Instruments

xbrl,body

We are exposed to various market risks, including the potential loss arising from adverse changes in interest rates. We may elect to use financial derivative instruments to hedge interest rate exposure. These decisions are principally based on our policy to manage the general trend in interest rates at the applicable dates and our perception of the future volatility of interest rates. Derivates are recorded at fair value on the balance sheet as assets or liabilities. The valuation of derivative instruments requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the fair value of the instruments. Fair values of our derivatives are estimated by pricing models that consider the forward yield curves and discount rates. Such amounts and the recognition of such amounts are subject to significant estimates that may change in the future.

The following is a summary of the fair value of our derivative instruments (dollars in thousands):

xbrl,dn,"Fair Value Of Derivative Instruments"

Balance Sheet — Location Fair Value — March 31, 2011 December 31, 2010
Cash flow hedge interest rate swaps Other liabilities $ 379 $ 482

/xbrl,dn

Cash Flow Hedges

For instruments that are designated and qualify as a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of other comprehensive income (“OCI”), and reclassified into earnings in the same period, or periods, during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Gains and losses on the derivative representing either hedge ineffectiveness or hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recognized in earnings. Approximately $1,983,000 of losses, which are included in accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”), are expected to be reclassified into earnings in the next 12 months.

The following presents the impact of derivative instruments on the statement of operations and OCI for the periods presented (dollars in thousands):

xbrl,dn,"Schedule Of Derivative Instruments Gain Loss In Statement Of Financial Performance"

Location Three Months Ended — March 31, 2011 March 31, 2010
Gain (loss) on interest rate swap recognized in
OCI (effective portion) n/a $ 892 $ (2,054 )
Gain (loss) reclassified from AOCI into
income (effective portion) Interest expense 410 (804 )
Gain (loss) recognized in income (ineffective portion
and amount excluded from
effectiveness testing) Realized loss — —

/xbrl,dn

On August 7, 2009, we entered into an interest rate swap (the “August 2009 Swap”) for a total notional amount of $52,198,000 to hedge seven years of interest payments associated with long-term LIBOR based borrowings. This swap was terminated on September 30, 2010 for a cash payment of $6,645,000 which has been deferred and included as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. The effective portion is being amortized over the remaining term of the original swap as an adjustment to the yield on our LIBOR-based debt. The August 2009 Swap had an effective date of August 12, 2009 and a maturity date of September 1, 2016. The August 2009 Swap had the economic effect of fixing $52,198,000 at 3.93% plus a credit spread for seven years. The August 2009 Swap had been designated as a cash flow hedge and we expected it to be highly effective at offsetting changes in cash flows of interest payments on $52,198,000 of long-term debt due to changes in the LIBOR swap rate.

On September 28, 2009, we entered into an interest rate swap (the “September 2009 Swap”) for a total notional amount of $48,155,000 to hedge seven years of interest payments associated with long-term LIBOR based borrowings. This swap was terminated on September 30, 2010 for a cash payment of $4,365,000 which has been deferred and included as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. The effective portion is being amortized over the remaining term of the original swap as an adjustment to the yield on our LIBOR-based debt. The September 2009 Swap had an effective date of September 30, 2009 and a maturity date of October 1, 2016. The September 2009 Swap had the economic effect of fixing $48,155,000 at 3.2675% plus a credit spread for seven years. The September 2009 Swap had been designated as a cash flow hedge and we expected it to be highly effective at offsetting changes in cash flows of interest payments on $48,155,000 of long-term debt due to changes in the LIBOR swap rate.

On December 31, 2010, we assumed an interest rate swap (the “December 2010 Swap”) for a total notional amount of $12,650,000 to hedge interest payments associated with long-term LIBOR based borrowings. The December 2010 Swap has an effective date of December 31, 2010 and a maturity date of December 31, 2013. The December 2010 Swap has the economic effect of fixing $12,650,000

Folio 14 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

xbrl

HEALTH CARE REIT, INC. NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

at 5.50% plus a credit spread through the swap’s maturity. In January 2011, the December 2010 Swap was designated as a cash flow hedge and we expect it to be highly effective at offsetting changes in cash flows of interest payments on $12,650,000 of long-term debt due to changes in the LIBOR swap rate.

Fair Value Hedges

For derivative instruments that are designated as a fair value hedge, the gain or loss on the derivative as well as the offsetting loss or gain on the hedged risk are recognized in current earnings. There were no outstanding fair value hedges at March 31, 2011 or December 31, 2010.

xbrl,n

12. Commitments and Contingencies

xbrl,body

We have two outstanding letters of credit issued for the benefit of certain insurance companies that provide workers’ compensation insurance to one of our tenants. Our obligation to provide the letters of credit terminates in 2013. At March 31, 2011, our obligation under the letters of credit was $4,200,000.

We have an outstanding letter of credit issued for the benefit of certain insurance companies that provide liability and property insurance to one of our tenants. Our obligation to provide the letter of credit terminates in 2013. At March 31, 2011, our obligation under the letter of credit was $1,000,000.

We have an outstanding letter of credit issued for the benefit of a city in Wisconsin that secures the completion and installation of certain public improvements by one of our tenants in connection with the development of a property. Our obligation to provide the letter of credit terminates in October 2013. At March 31, 2011, our obligation under the letter of credit was $215,000.

We have an outstanding letter of credit issued for the benefit of a village in Illinois that secures the completion and installation of certain public improvements by one of our tenants in connection with the development of a property. Our obligation to provide the letter of credit terminates in August 2011. At March 31, 2011, our obligation under the letter of credit was $67,932.

At March 31, 2011, we had outstanding construction in process of $353,812,000 for leased properties and were committed to providing additional funds of approximately $193,552,000 to complete construction. At March 31, 2011, we had contingent purchase obligations totaling $30,989,000. These contingent purchase obligations relate to unfunded capital improvement obligations. Rents due from the tenant are increased to reflect the additional investment in the property.

We evaluate our leases for operating versus capital lease treatment in accordance with ASC Topic 840 “Leases.” A lease is classified as a capital lease if it provides for transfer of ownership of the leased asset at the end of the lease term, contains a bargain purchase option, has a lease term greater than 75% of the economic life of the leased asset, or if the net present value of the future minimum lease payments are in excess of 90% of the fair value of the leased asset. One lease related to a senior housing triple-net facility contains a bargain purchase option and has been classified as a capital lease. At March 31, 2011, we had operating lease obligations of $230,190,000 relating to certain ground leases and company office space. We incurred rental expense relating to company office space of $515,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 as compared to $333,000 for the same period in 2010. Regarding the ground leases, we have sublease agreements with certain of our operators that require the operators to reimburse us for our monthly operating lease obligations. At March 31, 2011, aggregate future minimum rentals to be received under these noncancelable subleases totaled $31,980,000.

At March 31, 2011, future minimum lease payments due under operating and capital leases are as follows (in thousands):

xbrl,dn,"Future Minimum Lease Payments Due Under Operating And Capital Leases"

Operating Leases Capital Leases (1)
2011 $ 4,714 $ 85
2012 5,324 136
2013 5,334 163
2014 5,355 193
2015 5,101 8,236
Thereafter 204,362 —
Totals $ 230,190 $ 8,813

/xbrl,dn

(1) Related to gross assets of $17,815,000 recorded in real property.

Folio 15 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

xbrl

HEALTH CARE REIT, INC. NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

xbrl,n

13. Stockholders’ Equity

xbrl,body

The following is a summary of our stockholder’s equity capital accounts as of the dates indicated:

xbrl,dn,"Schedule Of Stock By Class"

Preferred Stock:
Authorized shares 50,000,000 50,000,000
Issued shares 25,724,854 11,349,854
Outstanding shares 25,724,854 11,349,854
Common Stock, $1.00 par value:
Authorized shares 225,000,000 225,000,000
Issued shares 176,948,234 147,381,191
Outstanding shares 176,619,623 147,097,381

/xbrl,dn

Preferred Stock. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, certain holders of our Series G Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock converted 23,986 shares into 17,166 shares of our common stock, leaving 375,727 of such shares outstanding at March 31, 2010. The remaining Series G shares were subsequently converted into common shares on or prior to September 30, 2010. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we issued 14,375,000 of 6.50% Series I Cumulative Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock. These shares have a liquidation value of $50.00 per share. Dividends are payable quarterly in arrears. The Series I preferred stock is not redeemable by us. The preferred shares are convertible, at the holder’s option, into 0.8460 shares of common stock (equal to an initial conversion price of approximately $59.10).

Common Stock. The following is a summary of our common stock issuances during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts):

xbrl,dn,"Summary Of Common Stock Issuances"

| 2010 Dividend
reinvestment plan
issuances | 385,875 | Average Price — $ 42.00 | Gross Proceeds — $ 16,208 | Net Proceeds — $ 16,208 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2010 Option exercises | 42,287 | 37.43 | 1,583 | 1,583 |
| 2010 Totals | 428,162 | | $ 17,791 | $ 17,791 |
| March 2011 public issuance | 28,750,000 | $ 49.25 | $ 1,415,938 | $ 1,358,694 |
| 2011 Dividend
reinvestment plan
issuances | 574,652 | 48.42 | 27,822 | 27,822 |
| 2011 Option exercises | 37,922 | 42.24 | 1,602 | 1,602 |
| 2011 Totals | 29,362,574 | | $ 1,445,362 | $ 1,388,118 |

/xbrl,dn

Dividends . The following is a summary of our dividend payments (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts):

xbrl,dn,"Summary Of Dividend Payments"

Three Months Ended — March 31, 2011 March 31, 2010
Per Share Amount Per Share Amount
Common Stock $ 0.6900 $ 102,040 $ 0.6800 $ 84,523
Series D Preferred Stock 0.4922 1,969 0.4922 1,969
Series E Preferred Stock — — 0.3750 28
Series F Preferred Stock 0.4766 3,336 0.4766 3,336
Series G Preferred Stock — — 0.4688 176
Series H Preferred Stock 0.3750 131
Series I Preferred Stock 0.2257 3,244
Totals $ 110,720 $ 90,032

/xbrl,dn

Folio 16 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

xbrl

HEALTH CARE REIT, INC. NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Comprehensive Income

The following is a summary of accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) as of the dates indicated (in thousands):

xbrl,dn,"Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Loss Net Of Tax"

Unrecognized losses on cash flow hedges March 31, 2011 — $ (9,487 ) December 31, 2010 — $ (9,969 )
Unrecognized losses on equity investments (175 ) (497 )
Unrecognized actuarial losses (633 ) (633 )
Totals $ (10,295 ) $ (11,099 )

/xbrl,dn

The following is a summary of comprehensive income/(loss) for the periods indicated (in thousands):

xbrl,dn,"Comprehensive Income Note"

Three Months Ended
March 31,
2011 2010
Unrecognized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges $ 482 $ (1,291 )
Unrecognized gains on equity investments 322 90
Total other comprehensive income (loss) 804 (1,201 )
Net income attributable to controlling interests 32,052 31,321
Comprehensive income attributable to controlling interests 32,856 30,120
Net and comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests (1) (242 ) 373
Total comprehensive income $ 32,614 $ 30,493

/xbrl,dn

(1) Includes amounts attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests.

Other Equity

Other equity consists of accumulated option compensation expense which represents the amount of amortized compensation costs related to stock options awarded to employees and directors. Expense, which is recognized as the options vest based on the market value at the date of the award, totaled $1,039,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 as compared to $973,000 for the same period in 2010.

xbrl,n

14. Stock Incentive Plans

xbrl,body

Our Amended and Restated 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan authorizes up to 6,200,000 shares of common stock to be issued at the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The 2005 Plan replaced the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan and the Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors. The options granted to officers and key employees under the 1995 Plan continued to vest through 2010 and expire ten years from the date of grant. Our non-employee directors, officers and key employees are eligible to participate in the 2005 Plan. The 2005 Plan allows for the issuance of, among other things, stock options, restricted stock, deferred stock units and dividend equivalent rights. Vesting periods for options, deferred stock units and restricted shares generally range from three years for non-employee directors to five years for officers and key employees. Options expire ten years from the date of grant.

Valuation Assumptions

The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

xbrl,dn,"Weighted Average Estimated Fair Value And Assumptions Utilized By Company"

Three Months Ended — March 31, 2011 March 31, 2010
Dividend yield 5.74 % 6.28 %
Expected volatility 34.80 % 34.08 %
Risk-free interest rate 2.87 % 3.23 %
Expected life (in years) 7.0 7.0
Weighted-average fair value $ 9.60 $ 7.82

/xbrl,dn

The dividend yield represented the dividend yield of our common stock on the dates of grant. Our computation of expected

Folio 17 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

xbrl

HEALTH CARE REIT, INC. NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

volatility was based on historical volatility. The risk-free interest rates used were the 7-year U.S. Treasury Notes yield on the date of grant. The expected life was based on historical experience of similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms, vesting schedules and expectations regarding future employee behavior.

Option Award Activity

The following table summarizes information about stock option activity for the three months ended March 31, 2011:

xbrl,dn,"Summary Of Stock Options Outstanding And Exercised Under Various Stock Options Plans"

Number of — Shares Average Remaining Aggregate — Intrinsic
Stock Options (000’s) Exercise Price Contract Life (years) Value ($000’s)
Options at beginning of year 1,207 $ 39.45 8.0
Options granted 289 49.17
Options exercised (38 ) 36.47
Options terminated (5 ) 41.64
Options at end of period 1,453 $ 41.45 7.6 $ 15,969
Options exercisable at end of period 621 $ 38.68 6.0 $ 8,544
Weighted average fair value of
options granted during the period $ 9.60

/xbrl,dn

The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying options and the quoted price of our common stock for the options that were in-the-money at March 31, 2011. During the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, the aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised under our stock incentive plans was $789,000 and $307,000, respectively (determined as of the date of option exercise). Cash received from option exercises under our stock incentive plans was $1,602,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011.

As of March 31, 2011, there was approximately $4,852,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options granted under our stock incentive plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of four years. As of March 31, 2011, there was approximately $17,497,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock granted under our stock incentive plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of three years.

The following table summarizes information about non-vested stock incentive awards as of March 31, 2011 and changes for the three months ended March 31, 2011:

xbrl,dn,"Non Vested Stock Incentive Awards"

Number of Weighted Average Number of Weighted Average
Shares Grant Date Shares Grant Date
(000’s) Fair Value (000’s) Fair Value
Non-vested at December 31,
2010 768 $ 6.19 420 $ 41.09
Vested (220 ) 6.12 (144 ) 41.85
Granted 289 9.60 241 49.19
Terminated (5 ) 6.61 (4 ) 40.66
Non-vested at March 31, 2011 832 $ 7.39 513 $ 44.68

/xbrl,dn

Folio 18 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

xbrl

HEALTH CARE REIT, INC. NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

xbrl,n

15. Earnings Per Share

xbrl,body

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands, except per share data):

xbrl,dn,"Computation Of Basic And Diluted Earnings Per Share"

Three Months Ended
March 31,
2011 2010
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings
per share — net income attributable to
common stockholders $ 23,372 $ 25,812
Denominator for basic earnings per
share — weighted average shares 154,945 123,270
Effect of dilutive securities:
Employee stock options 190 105
Non-vested restricted shares 215 415
Convertible senior unsecured notes 135 —
Dilutive potential common shares 540 520
Denominator for diluted earnings per
share — adjusted weighted average
shares 155,485 123,790
Basic earnings per share $ 0.15 $ 0.21
Diluted earnings per share $ 0.15 $ 0.21

/xbrl,dn

The diluted earnings per share calculations exclude the dilutive effect of 0 and 381,000 stock options for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, because the exercise prices were less than the average market price. The Series H Cumulative Convertible and Redeemable Preferred Stock and Series I Cumulative Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock were not included in the 2011 calculation as the effect of conversions into common stock was anti-dilutive for that period. The outstanding convertible senior unsecured notes due 2029 were not included in the 2011 calculation as the effect of the conversions into common stock was anti-dilutive for that period.

xbrl,n

16. Disclosure about Fair Value of Financial Instruments

xbrl,body

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value.

Mortgage Loans and Other Real Estate Loans Receivable — The fair value of mortgage loans and other real estate loans receivable is generally estimated by discounting the estimated future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities.

Cash and Cash Equivalents — The carrying amount approximates fair value.

Available-for-sale Equity Investments — Available-for-sale equity investments are recorded at their fair value based on publicly available trading prices.

Borrowings Under Unsecured Lines of Credit Arrangements — The carrying amount of the unsecured line of credit arrangement approximates fair value because the borrowings are interest rate adjustable.

Senior Unsecured Notes — The fair value of the senior unsecured notes payable was estimated based on publicly available trading prices.

Secured Debt — The fair value of fixed rate secured debt is estimated by discounting the estimated future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities. The carrying amount of variable rate secured debt approximates fair value because the borrowings are interest rate adjustable.

Interest Rate Swap Agreements — Interest rate swap agreements are recorded as assets or liabilities on the balance sheet at fair market value. Fair market value is estimated by utilizing pricing models that consider forward yield curves and discount rates.

Folio 19 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

xbrl

HEALTH CARE REIT, INC. NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of our financial instruments are as follows (in thousands):

xbrl,dn,"Fair Value By Balance Sheet Grouping"

March 31, 2011 — Carrying Fair December 31, 2010 — Carrying Fair
Amount Value Amount Value
Financial Assets:
Mortgage loans receivable $ 118,323 $ 121,119 $ 109,283 $ 111,255
Other real estate loans receivable 329,028 329,054 327,297 333,003
Available-for-sale equity investments 1,425 1,425 1,103 1,103
Cash and cash equivalents 2,667,995 2,667,995 131,570 131,570
Financial Liabilities:
Borrowings under unsecured lines of
credit arrangements $ — $ — $ 300,000 $ 300,000
Senior unsecured notes 4,427,850 4,691,831 3,034,949 3,267,638
Secured debt 1,711,973 1,769,075 1,125,906 1,178,081
Interest rate swap agreements 379 379 482 482

/xbrl,dn

U.S. GAAP provides authoritative guidance for measuring and disclosing fair value measurements of assets and liabilities. The guidance for financial assets and liabilities was previously adopted as the standard for those assets and liabilities as of January 1, 2008. Additional guidance for non-financial assets and liabilities is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and was adopted as the standard for those assets and liabilities as of January 1, 2009. The impact of adoption was not significant. The guidance defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The guidance also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The guidance describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 — Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Interest rate swap agreements are valued using models that assume a hypothetical transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability in the principal market for the asset or liability based on market data derived from interest rates and yield curves observable at commonly quoted intervals, volatilities, prepayment timing, loss severities, credit risks and default rates.

Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

Items Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The market approach is utilized to measure fair value for our financial assets and liabilities reported at fair value on a recurring basis. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities.

xbrl,dn,"Fair Value Assets And Liabilities Measured On Recurring Basis"

Fair Value Measurements as of March 31, 2011 — Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Available-for-sale equity investments (1) $ 1,425 $ 1,425 $ — $ —
Assets held for sale (2) 71,126 — 71,126 —
Interest rate swap agreements (3) (379 ) — (379 ) —
Totals $ 72,172 $ 1,425 $ 70,747 $ —

/xbrl,dn

(1) Unrealized gains or losses on equity investments are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) at each measurement date.
(2) Please see Note 5 for additional information.
(3) Please see Note 11 for additional information.

Folio 20 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

xbrl

HEALTH CARE REIT, INC. NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Items Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

In addition to items that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, we also have assets and liabilities on our balance sheet that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. As these assets and liabilities are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis, they are not included in the table above. Assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis include assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations (see Note 3) and asset impairments (see Note 5 for impairments of real property and Note 6 for impairments of loans receivable). We have determined that the fair value measurements included in each of these assets and liabilities rely primarily on company-specific inputs and our assumptions about the use of the assets and settlement of liabilities, as observable inputs are not available. As such, we have determined that each of these fair value measurements generally reside within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. We estimate the fair value of real estate using unobservable data such as net operating income and estimated capitalization and discount rates. We also consider local and national industry market data including comparable sales, and commonly engage an external real estate appraiser to assist us in our estimation of fair value.

xbrl,n

17. Segment Reporting

xbrl,body

During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we changed the name of our senior housing and care segment to senior housing triple-net. Additionally, we added a new senior housing operating segment. There was no activity related to this segment for the three months ended March 31, 2010. We invest in senior housing and health care real estate. We evaluate our business and make resource allocations on our three business segments: senior housing triple-net, senior housing operating and medical facilities. Our primary senior housing triple-net properties include skilled nursing facilities, assisted living facilities, independent living/continuing care retirement communities and combinations thereof. Under the senior housing triple-net segment, we invest in senior housing and health care real estate through acquisition and financing of primarily single tenant properties. Properties acquired are primarily leased under triple-net leases and we are not involved in the management of the property. Our senior housing operating properties include assisted living facilities and independent living/continuing care retirement communities that are owned and/or operated through RIDEA partnership structures. Our primary medical facility properties include medical office buildings, hospitals and life science buildings. Our medical office buildings are typically leased to multiple tenants and generally require a certain level of property management. Our hospital investments are structured similar to our senior housing triple-net investments. Our life science investments represent investments in an unconsolidated joint venture (see Note 7 for additional information). The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies (see Note 1 to the financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010). There are no intersegment sales or transfers. We evaluate performance based upon net operating income of the combined properties in each segment. Non-segment revenue consists mainly of interest income on non-real estate investments and other income. Non-segment assets consist of corporate assets including cash, deferred loan expenses and corporate offices and equipment among others. Non-property specific revenues and expenses are not allocated to individual segments in determining net operating income.

Summary information for the reportable segments during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 is as follows (in thousands and includes amounts from discontinued operations):

xbrl,dn,"Schedule Of Segment Reporting Information By Segment"

Rental Resident Fees Interest Other Total Property — Operating Net — Operating Real Estate — Depreciation/ Interest Total
Income and Services Income Income Revenues Expenses Income (1) Amortization Expense Assets
Three Months Ended March 31,
2011
Senior housing triple-net $ 105,741 $ 9,378 $ 507 $ 115,626 $ — $ 115,626 $ 30,956 $ 2,066 $ 4,801,976
Senior housing operating — $ 71,286 — — 71,286 49,272 22,014 20,131 6,527 2,291,468
Medical facilities (2) 66,321 2,331 1,786 70,438 16,042 54,396 23,681 7,292 3,376,362
Non-segment/Corporate — — 531 531 — 531 — 43,445 2,788,238
$ 172,062 $ 71,286 $ 11,709 $ 2,824 $ 257,881 $ 65,314 $ 192,567 $ 74,768 $ 59,330 $ 13,258,044
Three Months Ended March 31,
2010
Senior housing triple-net $ 93,238 $ 8,575 $ 494 $ 102,307 $ — $ 102,307 $ 26,399 $ 4,671
Medical facilities (2) 50,869 473 271 51,613 13,720 37,893 17,182 5,577
Non-segment/Corporate — — 231 231 — 231 — 19,737
$ 144,107 $ — $ 9,048 $ 996 $ 154,151 $ 13,720 $ 140,431 $ 43,581 $ 29,985

/xbrl,dn

| (1) | Net operating income (“NOI”) is used to evaluate the operating performance of our properties.
We define NOI as total revenues, including tenant reimbursements, less property level
operating expenses, which exclude depreciation and amortization, general and administrative
expenses, impairments and interest expense. We believe NOI provides investors relevant and
useful information because it measures the operating performance of our properties at the
property level on an unleveraged basis. We use NOI to make decisions about resource
allocations and to assess the property level performance of our properties. |
| --- | --- |
| (2) | Excludes income and expense amounts related to properties held in unconsolidated joint
ventures. Please see Note 7 for additional information. |

Folio 21 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

xbrl

HEALTH CARE REIT, INC. NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

xbrl,n

18. Subsequent Events

xbrl,body

Genesis Acquisition. On April 1, 2011, we completed the acquisition of substantially all of the real estate assets of privately-owned Genesis HealthCare Corporation. The total purchase price of approximately $2,475,144,000 is comprised of the $2,400,000,000 cash consideration and the fair value of capital lease obligations totaling approximately $75,144,000. We expect that substantially the entire purchase price will be allocated to the tangible and intangible assets relating to the 147 properties acquired. Based on the preliminary purchase price allocation, depreciation expense is expected to be approximately $63,500,000 on an annual basis. We funded the cash consideration and other associated costs of the acquisition primarily through the proceeds of the offerings of common stock, preferred stock and senior unsecured notes completed in March 2011. Effective April 1, 2011, we began leasing the acquired facilities to Genesis pursuant to a master lease. In addition to rent, the triple net master lease requires Genesis to pay all operating costs, utilities, real estate taxes, insurance, building repairs, maintenance costs and all obligations under the ground leases. All obligations under the master lease have been guaranteed by FC-GEN Operations Investment, LLC, which was spun-off by Genesis prior to closing the acquisition. The initial term is fifteen years. Genesis has one option to renew for an additional term of fifteen years. The master lease provides that the base rent for the first year is $198,000,000 and will increase at least 1.75% but no more than 3.50% (subject to CPI changes) for each of the years two through six during the initial term and at least 1.50% but no more than 3.00% per year thereafter (subject to CPI changes). We expect to recognize rental income based on the minimum rent escalators during the initial term.

/xbrl,ns

Folio 22 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis is based primarily on the consolidated financial statements of Health Care REIT, Inc. for the periods presented and should be read together with the notes thereto contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Other important factors are identified in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, including factors identified under the headings “Business,” “Risk Factors,” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

Executive Summary

Company Overview

Health Care REIT, Inc. is a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) that has been at the forefront of senior housing and health care real estate since the company was founded in 1970. We are an S&P 500 company headquartered in Toledo, Ohio and our portfolio spans the full spectrum of senior housing and health care real estate, including senior housing communities, skilled nursing facilities, medical office buildings, inpatient and outpatient medical centers and life science facilities. Our capital programs, when combined with comprehensive planning, development and property management services, make us a single-source solution for acquiring, planning, developing, managing, repositioning and monetizing real estate assets. The following table summarizes our portfolio as of March 31, 2011:

Type of Property Investments — (in thousands) Percentage of — Investments Number of — Properties # Beds/Units — or Sq. Ft. metric (1) States
Senior housing triple-net $ 3,386,716 32.9 % 247 21,794 units $181,141 per unit 35
Skilled nursing facilities 1,253,655 12.2 % 181 24,220 beds 51,761 per bed 26
Senior housing operating 2,240,442 21.8 % 99 9,908 units 226,125 per unit 21
Hospitals 806,902 7.9 % 31 1,857 beds 444,928 per bed 13
Medical office buildings (2) 2,240,199 21.8 % 162 9,047,275 sq. ft. 254 per sq. ft. 28
Life science buildings (2) 344,413 3.4 % 7 n/a 1
Totals $ 10,272,327 100.0 % 727 44

| (1) | Investment per metric was computed by using the total committed investment amount of $10,465,879,000, which includes net real estate investments, our share of unconsolidated joint venture investments and unfunded
construction commitments for which initial funding has commenced which amounted to $9,880,454,000, $391,873,000 and $193,552,000, respectively. |
| --- | --- |
| (2) | Includes our share of unconsolidated joint venture investments. Please see Note 7 to our unaudited financial statements for additional information. |

Health Care Industry

The demand for health care services, and consequently health care properties, is projected to reach unprecedented levels in the near future. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) projects that national health expenditures will rise to $3.5 trillion in 2015 or 18.2% of gross domestic product (“GDP”). The average annual growth in national health expenditures for 2009 through 2019 is expected to be 6.3%, which is 0.2% faster than pre-health care reform estimates.

While demographics are the primary driver of demand, economic conditions and availability of services contribute to health care service utilization rates. We believe the health care property market may be less susceptible to fluctuations and economic downturns relative to other property sectors. Investor interest in the market remains strong, especially in specific sectors such as medical office buildings, regardless of the current stringent lending environment. As a REIT, we believe we are situated to benefit from any turbulence in the capital markets due to our access to capital.

The total U.S. population is projected to increase by 20.4% through 2030. The elderly population aged 65 and over is projected to increase by 79.2% through 2030. The elderly are an important component of health care utilization, especially independent living services, assisted living services, skilled nursing services, inpatient and outpatient hospital services and physician ambulatory care. Most health care services are provided within a health care facility such as a hospital, a physician’s office or a senior housing facility. Therefore, we believe there will be continued demand for companies, such as ours, with expertise in health care real estate.

The following chart illustrates the projected increase in the elderly population aged 65 and over:

Folio 23 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Source: U.S. Census Bureau

Health care real estate investment opportunities tend to increase as demand for health care services increases. We recognize the need for health care real estate as it correlates to health care service demand. Health care providers require real estate to house their businesses and expand their services. We believe that investment opportunities in health care real estate will continue to be present due to:

| • | The specialized nature of the industry, which enhances the credibility and experience of
our company; |
| --- | --- |
| • | The projected population growth combined with stable or increasing health care
utilization rates, which ensures demand; and |
| • | The on-going merger and acquisition activity. |

Current Economic and Capital Market Outlook

In the commercial real estate market, property prices generally continue to fluctuate. Likewise, the U.S. credit markets have experienced significant price volatility, dislocations and liquidity disruptions, which sometimes impact access to and cost of capital. In spite of these challenges, we successfully raised over $3 billion of debt and equity capital during the first quarter of 2011 in order to fund our attractive investment opportunities. We believe our success in sourcing capital is due to our strategic deal sourcing and the significant growth underlying the health care real estate sector in general.

We will continue to be selective as further income-enhancing acquisition opportunities are pursued. Investment opportunities must adhere to our strict underwriting and risk allocation criteria. In addition, we will continue to monitor the commercial real estate and U.S. credit markets carefully and, if required will make decisions to adjust our business strategy accordingly. See our discussion of “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 for further discussion.

Business Strategy

Our primary objectives are to protect stockholder capital and enhance stockholder value. We seek to pay consistent cash dividends to stockholders and create opportunities to increase dividend payments to stockholders as a result of annual increases in rental and interest income and portfolio growth. To meet these objectives, we invest across the full spectrum of senior housing and health care real estate and diversify our investment portfolio by property type, customer and geographic location.

Substantially all of our revenues and sources of cash flows from operations are derived from operating lease rentals and interest earned on outstanding loans receivable. These items represent our primary source of liquidity to fund distributions and are dependent upon our obligors’ continued ability to make contractual rent and interest payments to us. To the extent that our obligors experience operating difficulties and are unable to generate sufficient cash to make payments to us, there could be a material adverse impact on our consolidated results of operations, liquidity and/or financial condition. To mitigate this risk, we monitor our investments through a variety of methods determined by the type of property and operator/tenant. Our asset management process includes review of monthly financial statements for each property, periodic review of obligor credit, periodic property inspections and review of covenant compliance relating to licensure, real estate taxes, letters of credit and other collateral. In monitoring our portfolio, our personnel use a proprietary database to collect and analyze property-specific data. Additionally, we conduct extensive research to ascertain industry trends and risks. Through these asset management and research efforts, we are typically able to intervene at an early stage to address payment risk, and in so doing, support both the collectability of revenue and the value of our investment.

In addition to our asset management and research efforts, we also structure our investments to help mitigate payment risk. Operating leases and loans are normally credit enhanced by guaranties and/or letters of credit. In addition, operating leases are

Folio 24 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

typically structured as master leases and loans are generally cross-defaulted and cross-collateralized with other loans, operating leases or agreements between us and the obligor and its affiliates.

For the three months ended March 31, 2011, rental income, resident fees and services and interest income represented 67%, 28% and 5%, respectively, of total gross revenues (including revenues from discontinued operations). Substantially all of our operating leases are designed with either fixed or contingent escalating rent structures. Leases with fixed annual rental escalators are generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the initial lease period, subject to a collectability assessment. Rental income related to leases with contingent rental escalators is generally recorded based on the contractual cash rental payments due for the period. Our yield on loans receivable depends upon a number of factors, including the stated interest rate, the average principal amount outstanding during the term of the loan and any interest rate adjustments.

Depending upon the availability and cost of external capital, we believe our liquidity is sufficient to fund operations, meet debt service obligations (both principal and interest), make dividend distributions and complete construction projects in process. We also anticipate evaluating opportunities to finance future investments. New investments are generally funded from temporary borrowings under our unsecured line of credit arrangement, internally generated cash and the proceeds from sales of real property. Our investments generate internal cash from rent and interest receipts and principal payments on loans receivable. Permanent financing for future investments, which replaces funds drawn under the unsecured line of credit arrangement, has historically been provided through a combination of public and private offerings of debt and equity securities and the incurrence or assumption of secured debt.

Our primary sources of cash include rent and interest receipts, resident fees and services, borrowings under the unsecured line of credit arrangement, public and private offerings of debt and equity securities, proceeds from the sales of real property and principal payments on loans receivable. Our primary uses of cash include dividend distributions, debt service payments (including principal and interest), real property investments (including construction advances), loan advances, property operating expenses and general and administrative expenses. Depending upon market conditions, we believe that new investments will be available in the future with spreads over our cost of capital that will generate appropriate returns to our stockholders. We expect to complete gross new investments of $4,040,300,000 in 2011, comprised of acquisitions/joint ventures totaling $3,786,961,000 and funded new development of $253,339,000. We anticipate the sale of real property and the repayment of loans receivable totaling approximately $300,000,000 during 2011. It is possible that additional loan repayments or sales of real property may occur in the future. To the extent that loan repayments and real property sales exceed new investments, our revenues and cash flows from operations could be adversely affected. We expect to reinvest the proceeds from any loan repayments and real property sales in new investments. To the extent that new investment requirements exceed our available cash on-hand, we expect to borrow under our unsecured line of credit arrangement. At March 31, 2011, we had $2,667,995,000 of cash and cash equivalents, $38,722,000 of restricted cash and $1,150,000,000 of available borrowing capacity under our unsecured line of credit arrangement.

Key Transactions in 2011

We have completed the following key transactions to date in 2011:

| • | our Board of Directors increased the quarterly cash dividend to $0.715 per common share,
as compared to $0.69 per common share for 2010, beginning in May 2011. The dividend
declared for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 represents the 160 th consecutive
quarterly dividend payment; |
| --- | --- |
| • | we raised $3,534,688,000 of equity and unsecured debt capital in March; |
| • | we completed $1,375,404,000 of gross investments and had $25,499,000 of investment
payoffs during the three months ended March 31, 2011; and |
| • | we completed the $2,400,000,000 Genesis acquisition in April. |

Key Performance Indicators, Trends and Uncertainties

We utilize several key performance indicators to evaluate the various aspects of our business. These indicators are discussed below and relate to operating performance, concentration risk and credit strength. Management uses these key performance indicators to facilitate internal and external comparisons to our historical operating results, in making operating decisions and for budget planning purposes.

Operating Performance . We believe that net income attributable to common stockholders (“NICS”) is the most appropriate earnings measure. Other useful supplemental measures of our operating performance include funds from operations (“FFO”) and net operating income (“NOI”); however, these supplemental measures are not defined by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”). Please refer to the section entitled “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for further discussion and reconciliations of FFO and NOI. These earnings measures and their relative per share amounts are widely used by investors and analysts in the valuation, comparison and investment recommendations of companies. The following table reflects the recent historical trends of our operating performance measures for the periods presented (in thousands, except per share data):

Folio 25 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Three Months Ended — March 31, June 30, September 30, December 31, March 31,
2010 2010 2010 2010 2011
Net income attributable to
common stockholders $ 25,812 $ 45,646 $ 1,124 $ 34,301 $ 23,372
Funds from operations 63,087 92,214 41,108 82,670 70,851
Net operating income (1) 143,055 157,415 164,292 175,585 201,084
Per share data (fully diluted):
Net income attributable to
common stockholders $ 0.21 $ 0.37 $ 0.01 $ 0.25 $ 0.15
Funds from operations 0.51 0.74 0.33 0.60 0.46

(1) Includes our share of net operating income from unconsolidated joint ventures.

Concentration Risk . We evaluate our concentration risk in terms of asset mix, investment mix, customer mix and geographic mix. Concentration risk is a valuable measure in understanding what portion of our investments could be at risk if certain sectors were to experience downturns. Asset mix measures the portion of our investments that are real property. In order to qualify as an equity REIT, at least 75% of our real estate investments must be real property whereby each property, which includes the land, buildings, improvements, intangibles and related rights, is owned by us and leased to a tenant pursuant to a long-term operating lease. Investment mix measures the portion of our investments that relate to our various property types. Customer mix measures the portion of our investments that relate to our top five customers. Geographic mix measures the portion of our investments that relate to our top five states. The following table reflects our recent historical trends of concentration risk for the periods presented:

2010 2010 2010 2010 2011
Asset mix:
Real property 88 % 88 % 90 % 91 % 92 %
Real estate loans receivable 7 % 7 % 5 % 5 % 4 %
Joint venture investments 5 % 5 % 5 % 4 % 4 %
Investment mix: (1)
Senior housing triple-net 38 % 39 % 34 % 37 % 33 %
Skilled nursing facilities 22 % 21 % 18 % 14 % 12 %
Senior housing operating 0 % 0 % 10 % 12 % 22 %
Hospitals 10 % 10 % 10 % 9 % 8 %
Medical office buildings 25 % 25 % 23 % 24 % 22 %
Life science buildings 5 % 5 % 5 % 4 % 3 %
Customer mix: (1)
Benchmark Senior Living 9 %
Merrill Gardens LLC 10 % 8 % 7 %
Brandywine Senior Living, LLC 7 % 6 %
Senior Living Communities, LLC 8 % 8 % 8 % 7 % 6 %
Senior Star Living 5 % 5 %
Brookdale Senior Living, Inc. 5 % 4 % 4 % 4 %
Aurora Health Care, Inc. 5 % 5 % 4 %
Signature Healthcare LLC 4 % 4 % 4 %
Emeritus Corporation 4 % 3 %
Remaining customers 74 % 76 % 70 % 69 % 67 %
Geographic mix: (1)
California 9 % 9 % 11 % 10 % 10 %
Massachusetts 11 % 11 % 9 % 7 % 10 %
Florida 12 % 11 % 10 % 10 % 9 %
Texas 10 % 10 % 9 % 8 % 8 %
Washington 7 % 6 % 6 %
Wisconsin 7 % 7 %
Remaining states 51 % 52 % 54 % 59 % 57 %

(1) Includes our share of unconsolidated joint venture investments.

Folio 26 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Credit Strength. We measure our credit strength both in terms of leverage ratios and coverage ratios. Our leverage ratios include debt to book capitalization and debt to market capitalization. The leverage ratios indicate how much of our balance sheet capitalization is related to long-term debt. The coverage ratios indicate our ability to service interest and fixed charges (interest, secured debt principal amortization and preferred dividends). We expect to maintain capitalization ratios and coverage ratios sufficient to maintain compliance with our debt covenants. The coverage ratios are based on earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) which is discussed in further detail, and reconciled to net income, below in “Non-GAAP Financial Measures.” Leverage ratios and coverage ratios are widely used by investors, analysts and rating agencies in the valuation, comparison, investment recommendations and rating of companies. The following table reflects the recent historical trends for our credit strength measures for the periods presented:

March 31, June 30, September 30, December 31, March 31,
2010 2010 2010 2010 2011
Debt to book capitalization ratio 43 % 46 % 45 % 49 % 48 %
Debt to undepreciated book
capitalization ratio 39 % 41 % 41 % 45 % 45 %
Debt to market capitalization ratio 32 % 36 % 34 % 38 % 37 %
Interest coverage ratio 3.08 x 3.48 x 2.25 x 3.02 x 2.75 x
Fixed charge coverage ratio 2.44 x 2.78 x 1.86 x 2.51 x 2.22 x

We evaluate our key performance indicators in conjunction with current expectations to determine if historical trends are indicative of future results. Our expected results may not be achieved and actual results may differ materially from our expectations. Factors that may cause actual results to differ from expected results are described in more detail in “Forward-Looking Statements and Risk Factors” and other sections of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Management regularly monitors economic and other factors to develop strategic and tactical plans designed to improve performance and maximize our competitive position. Our ability to achieve our financial objectives is dependent upon our ability to effectively execute these plans and to appropriately respond to emerging economic and company-specific trends. Please refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 under the headings “Business,” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for further discussion of these risk factors.

Portfolio Update

Net operating income . The primary performance measure for our properties is net operating income (“NOI”) as discussed below in “Non-GAAP Financial Measures.” The following table summarizes our net operating income for the periods indicated (in thousands):

Three Months Ended — March 31, June 30, September 30, December 31, March 31,
2010 2010 2010 2010 2011
Net operating income:
Senior housing triple-net $ 102,307 $ 107,620 $ 107,535 $ 105,008 $ 115,626
Senior housing operating — — 4,816 13,569 22,014
Medical facilities (1) 40,517 48,983 51,710 55,411 62,913
Non-segment/corporate 231 812 231 1,597 531
Net operating income $ 143,055 $ 157,415 $ 164,292 $ 175,585 $ 201,084

(1) Includes our share of net operating income from unconsolidated joint ventures.

Payment coverage . Payment coverage of our triple-net operators continues to remain strong. Our overall payment coverage is at 2.07 times. The table below reflects our recent historical trends of portfolio coverage. Coverage data reflects the 12 months ended for the periods presented. CBMF represents the ratio of our customers’ earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, rent and management fees to contractual rent or interest due us. CAMF represents the ratio of our customers’ earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and rent (but after imputed management fees) to contractual rent or interest due us.

Folio 27 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

CBMF CAMF CBMF CAMF CBMF CAMF
Senior housing triple-net 1.49x 1.27x 1.49x 1.28x 1.55x 1.33x
Skilled nursing facilities 2.25x 1.64x 2.29x 1.68x 2.38x 1.76x
Hospitals 2.36x 1.95x 2.39x 2.07x 2.57x 2.24x
Weighted averages 1.97x 1.53x 1.99x 1.57x 2.07x 1.65x

Corporate Governance

Maintaining investor confidence and trust has become increasingly important in today’s business environment. Our Board of Directors and management are strongly committed to policies and procedures that reflect the highest level of ethical business practices. Our corporate governance guidelines provide the framework for our business operations and emphasize our commitment to increase stockholder value while meeting all applicable legal requirements. These guidelines meet the listing standards adopted by the New York Stock Exchange and are available on our website at www.hcreit.com.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Sources and Uses of Cash

Our primary sources of cash include rent and interest receipts, borrowings under the unsecured line of credit arrangement, public and private offerings of debt and equity securities, proceeds from the sales of real property and principal payments on loans receivable. Our primary uses of cash include dividend distributions, debt service payments (including principal and interest), real property investments (including construction advances), loan advances and general and administrative expenses. These sources and uses of cash are reflected in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and are discussed in further detail below.

The following is a summary of our sources and uses of cash flows (dollars in thousands):

Three Months Ended — March 31, 2011 March 31, 2010 $ %
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period $ 131,570 $ 35,476 $ 96,094 271 %
Cash provided from operating activities 115,112 92,488 22,624 24 %
Cash used in investing activities (612,705 ) (291,863 ) (320,842 ) 110 %
Cash provided from financing activities 3,034,018 200,457 2,833,561 1,414 %
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 2,667,995 $ 36,558 $ 2,631,437 7,198 %

Operating Activities . The change in net cash provided from operating activities is primarily attributable to an increase in net income, excluding gains/losses on sales of properties, depreciation and amortization and debt extinguishment charges. These items are discussed below in “Results of Operations.” The following is a summary of our straight-line rent and above/below market lease amortization (dollars in thousands):

Three Months Ended — March 31, 2011 March 31, 2010 $ %
Gross straight-line rental income $ 5,030 $ 4,453 $ 577 13 %
Cash receipts due to real property sales (250 ) — (250 ) n/a
Prepaid rent receipts (3,362 ) (1,738 ) (1,624 ) 93 %
Amortization related to below (above) market leases, net 658 487 171 35 %
$ 2,076 $ 3,202 $ (1,126 ) -35 %

Gross straight-line rental income represents the non-cash difference between contractual cash rent due and the average rent recognized pursuant to U.S. GAAP for leases with fixed rental escalators, net of collectability reserves. This amount is positive in the first half of a lease term (but declining every year due to annual increases in cash rent due) and is negative in the second half of a lease term. The fluctuation in cash receipts due to real property sales is attributable to the lack of straight-line rent receivable balances on properties sold during the current year. The fluctuation in prepaid rent receipts is primarily due to changes in prepaid rent received at certain construction projects.

Folio 28 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Investing Activities . The changes in net cash used in investing activities are primarily attributable to net changes in real property and real estate loans receivable. The following is a summary of our investment and disposition activities (dollars in thousands):

Three Months Ended
March 31, 2011 March 31, 2010
Senior Housing Medical Senior Housing Medical
Triple-net Facilities Totals Triple-net Facilities Totals
Advances on real estate loans receivable:
Investments in new loans $ 11,807 $ — $ 11,807 $ 634 $ — $ 634
Draws on existing loans 8,824 2,481 11,305 10,517 — 10,517
Net cash advances on real estate loans 20,631 2,481 23,112 11,151 — 11,151
Receipts on real estate loans receivable:
Loan payoffs 7,607 — 7,607 1,599 — 1,599
Principal payments on loans 2,653 2,081 4,734 3,067 — 3,067
Total receipts on real estate loans 10,260 2,081 12,341 4,666 — 4,666
Net advances (receipts) on real estate loans $ 10,371 $ 400 $ 10,771 $ 6,485 $ — $ 6,485
March 31, 2011 March 31, 2010
Properties Amount Properties Amount
Real property acquisitions:
Senior housing operating 46 $ 1,126,130 — $ —
Senior housing triple-net 7 113,364 — —
Medical office buildings — — 17 223,152
Land parcels 1 9,396 — —
Total acquisitions 54 1,248,890 17 223,152
Less: Assumed debt (592,711 ) (108,244 )
Assumed other items, net (71,788 ) (31,048 )
Cash disbursed for acquisitions 584,391 83,860
Construction in progress cash additions 90,688 70,491
Capital improvements to existing properties 9,598 7,460
Total cash invested in real property 684,677 161,811
Real property dispositions:
Senior housing triple-net 14 17,892 2 25,097
Medical facilities — — 2 6,244
Total dispositions 14 17,892 4 31,341
Less: Gains (losses) on sales of real property 26,156 6,718
Proceeds from real property sales 44,048 38,059
Net cash investments in real property 40 $ 640,629 13 $ 123,752

Financing Activities . The changes in net cash provided from or used in financing activities are primarily attributable to changes related to our long-term debt arrangements, proceeds from the issuance of common stock and dividend payments.

For the three months ended March 31, 2011, we had a net decrease of $300,000,000 on our unsecured line of credit arrangement as compared to a net increase of $285,000,000 for the same period in 2010. The change in our senior unsecured notes is due to (i) the issuance of $400,000,000 of 3.625% senior unsecured notes due 2016, $600,000,000 of 5.25% senior unsecured notes due 2022 and $400,000,000 of 6.50% senior unsecured notes due 2041 in March 2011; (ii) the issuance of $342,394,000 of convertible senior unsecured notes in March 2010; and (iii) the repurchase of $302,118,000 of convertible senior unsecured notes in March 2010.

We may repurchase, redeem or refinance convertible and non-convertible senior unsecured notes from time to time, taking advantage of favorable market conditions when available. We may purchase senior notes for cash through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions, a tender offer or, in some cases, through the early redemption of such securities pursuant to their terms. The non-convertible senior unsecured notes are redeemable at our option, at any time in whole or from time to time in part, at a redemption price equal to the sum of (1) the principal amount of the notes (or portion of such notes) being redeemed plus accrued

Folio 29 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

and unpaid interest thereon up to the redemption date and (2) any “make-whole” amount due under the terms of the notes in connection with early redemptions. We cannot redeem the March and June 2010 convertible senior unsecured notes prior to December 1, 2014 unless such redemption is necessary to preserve our status as a REIT. However, on or after December 1, 2014, we may from time to time at our option redeem those notes, in whole or in part, for cash, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes we redeem, plus any accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the redemption date. Redemptions and repurchases of debt, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors.

The following is a summary of our common stock issuances for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts):

2010 Dividend reinvestment plan issuances 385,875 Average Price — $ 42.00 Gross Proceeds — $ 16,208 Net Proceeds — $ 16,208
2010 Option exercises 42,287 37.43 1,583 1,583
2010 Totals 428,162 $ 17,791 $ 17,791
March 2011 public issuance 28,750,000 $ 49.25 $ 1,415,938 $ 1,358,694
2011 Dividend reinvestment plan issuances 574,652 48.42 27,822 27,822
2011 Option exercises 37,922 42.24 1,602 1,602
2011 Totals 29,362,574 $ 1,445,362 $ 1,388,118

In order to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we must distribute at least 90% of our taxable income (including 100% of capital gains) to our stockholders. The increase in dividends is primarily attributable to an increase in our common shares outstanding. The following is a summary of our dividend payments (in thousands, except per share amounts):

Three Months Ended — March 31, 2011 March 31, 2010
Per Share Amount Per Share Amount
Common Stock $ 0.6900 $ 102,040 $ 0.6800 $ 84,523
Series D Preferred Stock 0.4922 1,969 0.4922 1,969
Series E Preferred Stock — — 0.3750 28
Series F Preferred Stock 0.4766 3,336 0.4766 3,336
Series G Preferred Stock — — 0.4688 176
Series H Preferred Stock 0.3750 131
Series I Preferred Stock 0.2257 3,244
Totals $ 110,720 $ 90,032

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we entered into a joint venture investment with Forest City Enterprises (NYSE:FCE.A and FCE.B). In connection with this transaction, we invested $174,692,000 of cash which is recorded as an equity investment on the balance sheet. Our share of the non-recourse secured debt assumed by the joint venture was approximately $156,729,000 with weighted-average interest rates of 7.1%. Also during the year ended December 31, 2010, we entered into a joint venture investment with a national medical office building company. In connection with this transaction, we invested $21,321,000 of cash which is recorded as an equity investment on our balance sheet. Our share of non-recourse debt was approximately $24,609,000 with weighted average interest rates of 6.06%. Please see Note 7 to our unaudited consolidated financial statements for additional information.

We are exposed to various market risks, including the potential loss arising from adverse changes in interest rates. We may or may not elect to use financial derivative instruments to hedge interest rate exposure. These decisions are principally based on the general trend in interest rates at the applicable dates, our perception of the future volatility of interest rates and our relative levels of variable rate debt and variable rate investments. Please see Note 11 to our unaudited consolidated financial statements for additional information.

At March 31, 2011, we had five outstanding letter of credit obligations totaling $5,482,932 and expiring between 2011 and 2013. Please see Note 12 to our unaudited consolidated financial statements for additional information.

Folio 30 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes our payment requirements under contractual obligations as of March 31, 2011 (in thousands):

Contractual Obligations Payments Due by Period — Total 2011 2012-2013 2014-2015 Thereafter
Unsecured line of credit arrangement $ — $ — $ — $ — $ —
Senior unsecured notes (1) 4,464,930 — 376,853 250,000 3,838,077
Secured debt (1) 1,691,706 19,761 290,877 349,483 1,031,585
Contractual interest obligations 3,214,516 234,185 630,924 545,119 1,804,288
Capital lease obligations 8,813 85 299 8,429 —
Operating lease obligations 230,190 4,714 10,658 10,456 204,362
Purchase obligations 2,624,541 2,510,882 95,613 18,046 —
Other long-term liabilities 4,890 1,614 — 866 2,410
Total contractual obligations $ 12,239,586 $ 2,771,241 $ 1,405,224 $ 1,182,399 $ 6,880,722

(1) Amounts represent principal amounts due and do not reflect unamortized premiums/discounts or other fair value adjustments as reflected on the balance sheet.

At March 31, 2011, we had an unsecured line of credit arrangement with a consortium of sixteen banks in the amount of $1.15 billion, which is scheduled to expire on August 6, 2012. Borrowings under the agreement are subject to interest payable in periods no longer than three months at either the agent bank’s prime rate of interest or the applicable margin over LIBOR interest rate, at our option (0.85% at March 31, 2011). The applicable margin is based on certain of our debt ratings and was 0.6% at March 31, 2011. In addition, we pay a facility fee annually to each bank based on the bank’s commitment amount. The facility fee depends on certain of our debt ratings and was 0.15% at March 31, 2011. We also pay an annual agent’s fee of $50,000. Principal is due upon expiration of the agreement.

We have $4,464,930,000 of senior unsecured notes principal outstanding with fixed annual interest rates ranging from 3.00% to 8.00%, payable semi-annually. Total contractual interest obligations on senior unsecured notes totaled $2,560,151,700 at March 31, 2011. A total of $788,077,000 of our senior unsecured notes are convertible notes that also contain put features. Please see Note 10 to our unaudited consolidated financial statements for additional information.

Additionally, we have secured debt with total outstanding principal of $1,691,706,000, collateralized by owned properties, with fixed annual interest rates ranging from 3.86% to 10.00%, payable monthly. The carrying values of the properties securing the debt totaled $2,807,594,000 at March 31, 2011. Total contractual interest obligations on secured debt totaled $654,363,962 at March 31, 2011.

At March 31, 2011, we had operating lease obligations of $230,190,000 relating primarily to ground leases at certain of our properties and office space leases. One lease related to a senior housing triple-net facility contains a bargain purchase option and has been classified as a capital lease.

Purchase obligations include $2,400,000,000 representing the cash portion of the Genesis HealthCare Corporation acquisition price. This acquisition was completed on April 1, 2011. See Note 18 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information. Purchase obligations also include unfunded construction commitments and contingent purchase obligations. At March 31, 2011, we had outstanding construction financings of $353,812,000 for leased properties and were committed to providing additional financing of approximately $193,552,000 to complete construction. At March 31, 2011, we had contingent purchase obligations totaling $30,989,000. These contingent purchase obligations relate to unfunded capital improvement obligations. Upon funding, amounts due from the tenant are increased to reflect the additional investment in the property.

Other long-term liabilities relate to our Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”) and a non-compete agreement. We have a SERP, a non-qualified defined benefit pension plan, which provides certain executive officers with supplemental deferred retirement benefits. The SERP provides an opportunity for participants to receive retirement benefits that cannot be paid under our tax-qualified plans because of the restrictions imposed by ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Benefits are based on compensation and length of service and the SERP is unfunded. We expect to contribute $1,500,000 to the SERP during the 2011 fiscal year. Benefit payments are expected to total $2,367,000 during the next five fiscal years and $2,410,000 thereafter. We use a December 31 measurement date for the SERP. The accrued liability on our balance sheet for the SERP was $4,230,000 and $4,066,000 at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

In connection with the Windrose merger, we entered into a consulting agreement with Frederick L. Farrar, which expired in

Folio 31 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

December 2008. We entered into a new consulting agreement with Mr. Farrar in December 2008, which expired in December 2009. Mr. Farrar agreed not to compete with us for a period of two years following the expiration of the agreement. In exchange for complying with the covenant not to compete, Mr. Farrar receives eight quarterly payments of $37,500, with the first payment to be made on the date of expiration of the agreement. The first payment to Mr. Farrar was made in January 2010 and the final payment will be made in September 2011.

Capital Structure

As of March 31, 2011, we had total equity of $6,770,603,000 and a total outstanding debt balance of $6,139,823,000, which represents a debt to total book capitalization ratio of 48%. Our ratio of debt to market capitalization was 37% at March 31, 2011. For the three months ended March 31, 2011, our interest coverage ratio was 2.75x and our fixed charge coverage ratio was 2.22x. Also, at March 31, 2011, we had $2,667,995,000 of cash and cash equivalents, $38,722,000 of restricted cash and $1,150,000,000 of available borrowing capacity under our unsecured line of credit arrangement.

Our debt agreements contain various covenants, restrictions and events of default. Certain agreements require us to maintain certain financial ratios and minimum net worth and impose certain limits on our ability to incur indebtedness, create liens and make investments or acquisitions. As of March 31, 2011, we were in compliance with all of the covenants under our debt agreements. Please refer to the section entitled “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for further discussion. None of our debt agreements contain provisions for acceleration which could be triggered by our debt ratings. However, under our unsecured line of credit arrangement, the ratings on our senior unsecured notes are used to determine the fees and interest charged.

We plan to manage the company to maintain compliance with our debt covenants and with a capital structure consistent with our current profile. Any downgrades in terms of ratings or outlook by any or all of the rating agencies could have a material adverse impact on our cost and availability of capital, which could in turn have a material adverse impact on our consolidated results of operations, liquidity and/or financial condition.

On May 7, 2009, we filed an open-ended automatic or “universal” shelf registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission covering an indeterminate amount of future offerings of debt securities, common stock, preferred stock, depositary shares, warrants and units. As of April 30, 2011, we had an effective registration statement on file in connection with our enhanced dividend reinvestment plan under which we may issue up to 10,000,000 shares of common stock. As of April 30, 2011, 7,829,813 shares of common stock remained available for issuance under this registration statement. We have entered into separate Equity Distribution Agreements with UBS Securities LLC, RBS Securities Inc., KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc. and Credit Agricole Securities (USA) Inc. relating to the offer and sale from time to time of up to $250,000,000 aggregate amount of our common stock (“Equity Shelf Program”). As of April 30, 2011, we had $119,985,000 of remaining capacity under the Equity Shelf Program. Depending upon market conditions, we anticipate issuing securities under our registration statements to invest in additional properties and to repay borrowings under our unsecured line of credit arrangement.

Results of Operations

Our primary sources of revenue include rent and interest. Our primary expenses include interest expense, depreciation and amortization, property operating expenses and general and administrative expenses. These revenues and expenses are reflected in our Consolidated Statements of Income and are discussed in further detail below. The following is a summary of our results of operations (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts):

Three Months Ended
March 31, March 31, Change
2011 2010 Amount %
Net income attributable to
common stockholders $ 23,372 $ 25,812 $ (2,440 ) -9 %
Funds from operations 70,851 63,087 7,764 12 %
EBITDA 166,037 105,344 60,693 58 %
Net operating income 201,084 143,055 58,029 41 %
Per share data (fully diluted):
Net income attributable to
common stockholders $ 0.15 $ 0.21 $ (0.06 ) -29 %
Funds from operations 0.46 0.51 (0.05 ) -10 %
Interest coverage ratio 2.75 x 3.08 x -0.33 x -11 %
Fixed charge coverage ratio 2.22 x 2.44 x -0.22 x -9 %

Folio 32 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

We evaluate our business and make resource allocations on our three business segments: senior housing triple-net, senior housing operating and medical facilities. Please see Note 17 to our unaudited consolidated financial statements for additional information.

Senior Housing Triple-net

The following is a summary of our results of operations for the senior housing triple-net segment (dollars in thousands):

Three Months Ended Change
March 31, March 31,
2011 2010 $ %
Revenues:
Rental income $ 103,337 $ 85,246 $ 18,091 21 %
Interest income 9,378 8,575 803 9 %
Other income 507 494 13 3 %
113,222 94,315 18,907 20 %
Expenses:
Interest expense 1,633 3,165 (1,532 ) -48 %
Depreciation and amortization 29,664 23,470 6,194 26 %
Transaction costs 3,996 5,019 (1,023 ) -20 %
35,293 31,654 3,639 11 %
Income from continuing
operations 77,929 62,661 15,268 24 %
Discontinued operations:
Gain on sales
of properties 26,156 5,728 20,428 357 %
Impairment of assets (202 ) — (202 ) n/a
Income from
discontinued
operations, net 679 3,557 (2,878 ) -81 %
Discontinued operations, net 26,633 9,285 17,348 187 %
Net income attributable to
common stockholders $ 104,562 $ 71,946 $ 32,616 45 %

The increase in rental income is primarily attributable to acquisitions and the conversion of newly constructed senior housing triple-net properties subsequent to March 31, 2010 from which we receive rent. Certain of our leases contain annual rental escalators that are contingent upon changes in the Consumer Price Index and/or changes in the gross operating revenues of the tenant’s properties. These escalators are not fixed, so no straight-line rent is recorded; however, rental income is recorded based on the contractual cash rental payments due for the period. If gross operating revenues at our facilities and/or the Consumer Price Index do not increase, a portion of our revenues may not continue to increase. Sales of real property would offset revenue increases and, to the extent that they exceed new acquisitions, could result in decreased revenues. Our leases could renew above or below current rent rates, resulting in an increase or decrease in rental income.

Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 represents $2,066,000 and $4,671,000, respectively, of secured debt interest expense offset by interest allocated to discontinued operations. The change in secured debt interest expense is due to the net effect and timing of assumptions, extinguishments and principal amortizations. The following is a summary of our senior housing triple-net property secured debt principal activity (dollars in thousands):

Three Months Ended Three Months Ended
March 31, 2011 March 31, 2010
Weighted Avg. Weighted Avg.
Amount Interest Rate Amount Interest Rate
Beginning balance $ 172,862 5.265 % $ 298,492 5.998 %
Debt assumed 6,612 4.590 % — 0.000 %
Principal payments (694 ) 5.624 % (1,341 ) 6.011 %
Ending balance $ 178,780 5.236 % $ 297,151 5.997 %
Monthly averages $ 176,935 5.247 % $ 297,850 5.998 %

Folio 33 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Depreciation and amortization increased primarily as a result of the conversions of newly constructed investment properties subsequent to March 31, 2010. To the extent that we acquire or dispose of additional properties in the future, our provision for depreciation and amortization will change accordingly.

Transaction costs for the three months ended March 31, 2011 were incurred in connection with the Genesis transaction and other acquisitions.

During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we sold 14 senior housing triple-net properties. Additionally, at March 31, 2011 we had 18 senior housing triple-net facilities that satisfied the requirements for held for sale treatment. We recorded an impairment charge of $202,000 related to two of these facilities to adjust the carrying values to estimated fair values less costs to sell based on current sales price expectations. The following illustrates the reclassification impact as a result of classifying the properties sold subsequent to January 1, 2010 or held for sale at March 31, 2011 as discontinued operations for the periods presented. Please refer to Note 5 to our unaudited consolidated financial statements for further discussion.

Three Months Ended
March 31,
2011 2010
Rental income $ 2,404 $ 7,992
Expenses:
Interest expense 433 1,506
Provision for depreciation 1,292 2,929
Income from discontinued operations, net $ 679 $ 3,557

Senior Housing Operating

As discussed in Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements, we completed two senior housing operating partnerships during the three months ended March 31, 2011. The results of operations for these partnerships have been included in our consolidated results of operations from the dates of acquisition. The senior housing operating partnerships were formed using the structure authorized by the REIT Investment Diversification and Empowerment Act of 2007 (“RIDEA”). When considering new partnerships utilizing the RIDEA structure, we look for opportunities with best-in-class operators with a strong seasoned leadership team, high-quality real estate in attractive markets, growth potential above the rent escalators in our triple-net lease senior housing portfolio, and alignment of economic interests with our operating partner. Our senior housing operating partnerships offer us the opportunity for external growth because we have the right to fund future senior housing investment opportunities sourced by our operating partners. There were no senior housing operating segment investments prior to September 1, 2010. The following is a summary of our senior housing operating results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2011 (dollars in thousands):

Revenues: — Resident fees and services $ 71,286
Expenses:
Interest expense 6,527
Property operating expenses 49,272
Depreciation and amortization 20,131
Transaction costs 32,069
107,999
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before income taxes and income (loss) from
unconsolidated joint ventures (36,713 )
Income (loss) from unconsolidated joint
ventures (565 )
Net income (loss) (37,278 )
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to
noncontrolling interests (1,407 )
Net income (loss) attributable to common
stockholders $ (35,871 )

Folio 34 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Transaction costs for the three months ended March 31, 2011 primarily represent costs incurred with the Silverado and Benchmark transactions (including due diligence costs, fees for legal and valuation services, and termination of a pre-existing relationship computed based on the fair value of the assets acquired), lease termination fees and costs incurred in connection with the new property acquisitions.

Medical Facilities

The following is a summary of our results of operations for the medical facilities segment (dollars in thousands):

Three Months Ended
March 31, March 31,
2011 2010 $ %
Revenues:
Rental income $ 66,321 $ 50,087 $ 16,234 32 %
Interest income 2,331 473 1,858 393 %
Other income 1,786 271 1,515 559 %
70,438 50,831 19,607 39 %
Expenses:
Interest expense 7,292 5,523 1,769 32 %
Property operating expenses 15,213 12,513 2,700 22 %
Depreciation and amortization 23,681 17,182 6,499 38 %
Transaction costs — 2,695 (2,695 ) -100 %
Provision for loan losses 248 — 248 n/a
46,434 37,913 8,521 22 %
Income from continuing operations
before income taxes and income
from unconsolidated joint ventures 24,004 12,918 11,086 86 %
Income tax (expense) benefit (111 ) (58 ) (53 ) 91 %
Income from unconsolidated
joint ventures 2,108 768 1,340 174 %
Income from continuing operations 26,001 13,628 12,373 91 %
Discontinued operations:
Gain (loss) on sales of properties — 990 (990 ) -100 %
Income (loss) from
discontinued operations, net (829 ) (479 ) (350 ) 73 %
Discontinued operations, net (829 ) 511 (1,340 ) n/a
Net income (loss) 25,172 14,139 11,033 78 %
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to
noncontrolling interests 1,165 373 792 212 %
Net income (loss) attributable to
common stockholders $ 24,007 $ 13,766 $ 10,241 74 %

The increase in rental income is primarily attributable to the acquisitions and construction conversions of medical facilities subsequent to March 31, 2010 from which we receive rent. Certain of our leases contain annual rental escalators that are contingent upon changes in the Consumer Price Index. These escalators are not fixed, so no straight-line rent is recorded; however, rental income is recorded based on the contractual cash rental payments due for the period. If the Consumer Price Index does not increase, a portion of our revenues may not continue to increase. Sales of real property would offset revenue increases and, to the extent that they exceed new acquisitions, could result in decreased revenues. Our leases could renew above or below current rent rates, resulting in an increase or decrease in rental income. Interest income decreased from the prior period primarily due to a decline in outstanding balances for medical facility real estate loans. Other income is attributable to third party management fee income.

Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 represents $7,292,000 and $5,577,000, respectively, of secured debt interest expense offset by interest allocated to discontinued operations. The change in secured debt interest expense is primarily due to the net effect and timing of assumptions, extinguishments and principal amortizations. The following is a summary of our medical facilities secured debt principal activity (dollars in thousands):

Folio 35 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Three Months Ended Three Months Ended
March 31, 2011 March 31, 2010
Weighted Avg. Weighted Avg.
Amount Interest Rate Amount Interest Rate
Beginning balance $ 463,477 6.005 % $ 314,065 5.677 %
Debt assumed — 0.000 % 106,140 7.352 %
Principal payments (2,924 ) 6.057 % (1,837 ) 5.875 %
Ending balance $ 460,553 5.996 % $ 418,368 6.101 %
Monthly averages $ 462,058 5.996 % $ 366,311 5.919 %

The increase in property operating expenses and depreciation and amortization is primarily attributable to acquisitions and construction conversions of new medical facilities for which we incur certain property operating expenses offset by property operating expenses associated with discontinued operations.

Income tax expense is primarily related to third party management fee income.

Income from unconsolidated joint ventures represents our share of net income related to our joint venture investments with Forest City Enterprises (effective February 2010) and a strategic medical office partnership (effective January 2011). The following is a summary of our share of net income from these investments for the periods presented (in thousands):

Three Months Ended — March 31, March 31, Change
2011 2010 $ %
Revenues $ 12,384 $ 3,725 $ 8,659 232 %
Operating expenses 3,868 1,101 2,767 251 %
Net operating income 8,516 2,624 5,892 225 %
Depreciation and
amortization 3,133 775 2,358 304 %
Interest expense 2,851 923 1,928 209 %
Asset management fee 424 158 266 168 %
Net income $ 2,108 $ 768 $ 1,340 174 %

At March 31, 2011, we had one medical facility that satisfied the requirements for held for sale treatment. The following illustrates the reclassification impact as a result of classifying the properties sold subsequent to January 1, 2010 or held for sale at March 31, 2011 as discontinued operations for the periods presented. Please refer to Note 5 to our unaudited consolidated financial statements for further discussion.

Three Months Ended
March 31,
2011 2010
Rental income $ — $ 782
Expenses:
Interest expense — 54
Property operating expenses 829 1,207
Loss from discontinued operations, net $ (829 ) $ (479 )

Net income attributable to non-controlling interests primarily relates to certain properties that are consolidated in our operating results but where we have less than a 100% ownership interest.

Non-Segment/Corporate

The following is a summary of our results of operations for the non-segment/corporate activities (dollars in thousands):

Folio 36 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Three Months Ended
March 31, March 31, Change
2011 2010 $ %
Revenues:
Other income $ 531 $ 231 $ 300 130 %
Expenses:
Interest expense 43,445 19,737 23,708 120 %
General and administrative 17,714 16,821 893 5 %
Loss (gain) on
extinguishments
of debt — 18,038 (18,038 ) -100 %
61,159 54,596 6,563 12 %
Loss from continuing operations
before income taxes (60,628 ) (54,365 ) (6,263 ) 12 %
Income tax (expense) benefit (17 ) (26 ) 9 -35 %
Net loss (60,645 ) (54,391 ) (6,254 ) 11 %
Preferred stock dividends 8,680 5,509 3,171 58 %
Net loss attributable to
common stockholders $ (69,325 ) $ (59,900 ) $ (9,425 ) 16 %

Other income primarily represents income from non-real estate activities such as interest earned on temporary investments of cash reserves.

The following is a summary of our non-segment/corporate interest expense (dollars in thousands):

Three Months Ended
March 31, March 31, Change
2011 2010 $ %
Senior unsecured notes $ 44,457 $ 24,066 $ 20,391 85 %
Secured debt 127 139 (12 ) -9 %
Unsecured lines of credit 1,271 1,040 231 22 %
Capitalized interest (4,665 ) (7,076 ) 2,411 -34 %
SWAP savings (40 ) (40 ) — 0 %
Loan expense 2,295 1,608 687 43 %
Totals $ 43,445 $ 19,737 $ 23,708 120 %

The change in interest expense on senior unsecured notes is due to the net effect of issuances and extinguishments. The following is a summary of our senior unsecured note principal activity (dollars in thousands):

Three Months Ended Three Months Ended
March 31, 2011 March 31, 2010
Weighted Avg. Weighted Avg.
Amount Interest Rate Amount Interest Rate
Beginning balance $ 3,064,930 5.129 % $ 1,661,853 5.557 %
Debt issued 1,400,000 5.143 % 342,394 3.000 %
Debt extinguished — (302,118 ) 4.750 %
Ending balance $ 4,464,930 5.133 % $ 1,702,129 5.186 %
Monthly averages $ 3,414,930 5.166 % $ 1,671,922 5.462 %

During the three months ended September 30, 2009, we completed a $10,750,000 first mortgage loan secured by a commercial real estate campus. The 10-year debt has a fixed interest rate of 6.37%.

The change in interest expense on the unsecured line of credit arrangement is due primarily to the net effect and timing of draws,

Folio 37 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

paydowns and variable interest rate changes. The following is a summary of our unsecured line of credit arrangement (dollars in thousands):

Three Months Ended March 31, — 2011 2010
Balance outstanding at quarter end $ — $ 425,000
Maximum amount outstanding at any month end $ 495,000 $ 425,000
Average amount outstanding (total of daily
principal balances divided by days in period) $ 319,222 $ 283,111
Weighted average interest rate (actual interest
expense divided by average borrowings
outstanding) 1.59 % 1.47 %

We capitalize certain interest costs associated with funds used to finance the construction of properties owned directly by us. The amount capitalized is based upon the balances outstanding during the construction period using the rate of interest that approximates our cost of financing. Our interest expense is reduced by the amount capitalized.

Please see Note 11 to our unaudited consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our interest rate swap agreements and their impact on interest expense. Loan expense represents the amortization of deferred loan costs incurred in connection with the issuance and amendments of debt.

General and administrative expenses as a percentage of consolidated revenues (including revenues from discontinued operations) for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 were 6.87% and 10.91%, respectively. The change from prior year is primarily related to the increasing revenue base as a result of our senior housing operating partnerships.

The following is a summary of our preferred stock activity (dollars in thousands):

March 31, 2011 March 31, 2010
Weighted Avg. Weighted Avg.
Shares Dividend Rate Shares Dividend Rate
Beginning balance 11,349,854 7.663 % 11,474,093 7.697 %
Shares issued 14,375,000 6.500 % — 0.000 %
Shares converted — 0.000 % (23,986 ) 7.500 %
Ending balance 25,724,854 7.013 % 11,450,107 7.697 %
Monthly averages 14,943,604 7.383 % 11,462,100 7.697 %

Folio 38 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

We believe that net income, as defined by U.S. GAAP, is the most appropriate earnings measurement. However, we consider FFO to be a useful supplemental measure of our operating performance. Historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with U.S. GAAP implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time as evidenced by the provision for depreciation. However, since real estate values have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors and analysts have considered presentations of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient. In response, the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) created FFO as a supplemental measure of operating performance for REITs that excludes historical cost depreciation from net income. FFO, as defined by NAREIT, means net income, computed in accordance with U.S. GAAP, excluding gains (or losses) from sales of real estate, plus depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.

Net operating income (“NOI”) is used to evaluate the operating performance of our properties. We define NOI as total revenues, including tenant reimbursements, less property level operating expenses, which exclude depreciation and amortization, general and administrative expenses, impairments and interest expense. We believe NOI provides investors relevant and useful information because it measures the operating performance of our properties at the property level on an unleveraged basis. We use NOI to make decisions about resource allocations and to assess the property level performance of our properties.

EBITDA stands for earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. We believe that EBITDA, along with net income and cash flow provided from operating activities, is an important supplemental measure because it provides additional information to assess and evaluate the performance of our operations. We primarily utilize EBITDA to measure our interest coverage ratio, which represents EBITDA divided by total interest, and our fixed charge coverage ratio, which represents EBITDA divided by fixed charges. Fixed charges include total interest, secured debt principal amortization and preferred dividends.

A covenant in our line of credit arrangement contains a financial ratio based on a definition of EBITDA that is specific to that agreement. Failure to satisfy this covenant could result in an event of default that could have a material adverse impact on our cost and availability of capital, which could in turn have a material adverse impact on our consolidated results of operations, liquidity and/or financial condition. Due to the materiality of this debt agreement and the financial covenant, we have disclosed Adjusted EBITDA, which represents EBITDA as defined above and adjusted for stock-based compensation expense, provision for loan losses and gain/loss on extinguishment of debt. We use Adjusted EBITDA to measure our adjusted fixed charge coverage ratio, which represents Adjusted EBITDA divided by fixed charges on a trailing twelve months basis. Fixed charges include total interest (excluding capitalized interest and non-cash interest expenses), secured debt principal amortization and preferred dividends. Our covenant requires an adjusted fixed charge ratio of at least 1.75 times.

Other than Adjusted EBITDA, our supplemental reporting measures and similarly entitled financial measures are widely used by investors, equity and debt analysts and rating agencies in the valuation, comparison, rating and investment recommendations of companies. Management uses these financial measures to facilitate internal and external comparisons to our historical operating results and in making operating decisions. Additionally, these measures are utilized by the Board of Directors to evaluate management. Adjusted EBITDA is used solely to determine our compliance with a financial covenant of our line of credit arrangement and is not being presented for use by investors for any other purpose. None of our supplemental measures represent net income or cash flow provided from operating activities as determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP and should not be considered as alternative measures of profitability or liquidity. Finally, the supplemental measures, as defined by us, may not be comparable to similarly entitled items reported by other real estate investment trusts or other companies. Multi-period amounts may not equal the sum of the individual quarterly amounts due to rounding.

Folio 39 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The tables below reflect the reconciliation of FFO to net income attributable to common stockholders, the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure, for the periods presented. The provisions for depreciation and amortization include provisions for depreciation and amortization from discontinued operations. Noncontrolling interest amounts represent the noncontrolling interests’ share of transaction costs and depreciation and amortization. Unconsolidated joint venture amounts represent our share of unconsolidated joint ventures’ depreciation and amortization. Amounts are in thousands except for per share data.

Three Months Ended — March 31, June 30, September 30, December 31, March 31,
2010 2010 2010 2010 2011
FFO Reconciliation:
Net income attributable to
common stockholders $ 25,812 $ 45,646 $ 1,124 $ 34,301 $ 23,372
Depreciation and amortization 43,581 47,451 49,106 62,406 74,768
Loss (gain) on sales of properties (6,718 ) (3,314 ) (10,526 ) (15,557 ) (26,156 )
Noncontrolling interests (363 ) 108 (1,292 ) (1,200 ) (4,160 )
Unconsolidated joint ventures 775 2,323 2,696 2,720 3,027
Funds from operations $ 63,087 $ 92,214 $ 41,108 $ 82,670 $ 70,851
Average common shares outstanding:
Basic 123,270 123,808 125,298 138,126 154,945
Diluted 123,790 124,324 125,842 138,738 155,485
Per share data:
Net income attributable to
common stockholders
Basic $ 0.21 $ 0.37 $ 0.01 $ 0.25 $ 0.15
Diluted 0.21 0.37 0.01 0.25 0.15
Funds from operations
Basic $ 0.51 $ 0.74 $ 0.33 $ 0.60 $ 0.46
Diluted 0.51 0.74 0.33 0.60 0.46

Folio 40 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following tables reflect the reconciliation of NOI for the periods presented. All amounts include amounts from discontinued operations, if applicable. Our share of revenues and expenses from unconsolidated joint ventures are included in medical facilities. Amounts are in thousands.

Three Months Ended — March 31, June 30, September 30, December 31, March 31,
2010 2010 2010 2010 2011
NOI Reconciliation:
Total revenues:
Senior housing triple-net:
Rental income:
Senior housing $ 52,366 $ 56,197 $ 56,162 $ 55,658 $ 68,654
Skilled nursing facilities 40,872 41,057 41,496 39,096 37,087
Sub-total 93,238 97,254 97,658 94,754 105,741
Interest income 8,575 8,830 9,179 9,593 9,378
Other income 494 1,536 698 661 507
Total senior housing
triple-net 102,307 107,620 107,535 105,008 115,626
Senior housing operating:
Resident fees and services — — 12,809 38,197 71,286
Medical facilities:
Rental income
Medical office buildings 40,088 42,056 43,758 44,532 54,769
Hospitals 10,781 12,484 13,313 13,494 12,667
Life science buildings 3,725 9,355 10,401 10,521 11,270
Sub-total 54,594 63,895 67,472 68,547 78,706
Interest income 473 505 875 2,826 2,331
Other income 271 302 227 185 1,786
Total medical facilities
revenues 55,338 64,702 68,574 71,558 82,823
Corporate other income 231 812 231 1,597 531
Total revenues 157,876 173,134 189,149 216,360 270,266
Property operating expenses:
Senior triple-net — — — — —
Senior housing operating — — 7,993 24,628 49,272
Medical facilities: —
Medical office buildings 12,992 12,853 13,307 12,936 15,439
Hospitals 728 150 522 352 870
Life science buildings 1,101 2,716 3,035 2,857 3,601
Sub-total 14,821 15,719 16,864 16,145 19,910
Non-segment/corporate — — — — —
Total property operating
expenses 14,821 15,719 24,857 40,773 69,182
Net operating income:
Senior housing triple-net 102,307 107,620 107,535 105,008 115,626
Senior housing operating 4,816 13,569 22,014
Medical facilities 40,517 48,983 51,710 55,413 62,913
Non-segment/corporate 231 812 231 1,597 531
Net operating income $ 143,055 $ 157,415 $ 164,292 $ 175,587 $ 201,084

Folio 41 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The tables below reflect the reconciliation of EBITDA to net income, the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure, for the periods presented. Interest expense and the provisions for depreciation and amortization include discontinued operations. Dollars are in thousands.

Three Months Ended — March 31, June 30, September 30, December 31, March 31,
2010 2010 2010 2010 2011
EBITDA Reconciliation:
Net income $ 31,694 $ 51,064 $ 5,781 $ 40,346 $ 31,810
Interest expense 29,985 37,550 44,985 48,440 59,330
Income tax expense 84 188 52 38 129
Depreciation and amortization 43,581 47,451 49,106 62,406 74,768
EBITDA $ 105,344 $ 136,253 $ 99,924 $ 151,230 $ 166,037
Interest Coverage Ratio:
Interest expense $ 29,985 $ 37,550 $ 44,985 $ 48,440 $ 59,330
Non-cash interest expense (2,841 ) (3,659 ) (4,258 ) (3,187 ) (3,716 )
Capitalized interest 7,076 5,276 3,656 4,784 4,665
Total interest 34,220 39,167 44,383 50,037 60,279
EBITDA $ 105,344 $ 136,253 $ 99,924 $ 151,230 $ 166,037
Interest coverage ratio 3.08 x 3.48 x 2.25 x 3.02 x 2.75 x
Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio:
Total interest $ 34,220 $ 39,167 $ 44,383 $ 50,037 $ 60,279
Secured debt principal payments 3,378 4,325 4,019 4,930 5,906
Preferred dividends 5,509 5,484 5,347 5,305 8,680
Total fixed charges 43,107 48,976 53,749 60,272 74,865
EBITDA $ 105,344 $ 136,253 $ 99,924 $ 151,230 $ 166,037
Fixed charge coverage ratio 2.44 x 2.78 x 1.86 x 2.51 x 2.22 x

Folio 42 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The table below reflects the reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income, the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure, for the periods presented. Interest expense and the provisions for depreciation and amortization include discontinued operations. Dollars are in thousands.

Twelve Months Ended — March 31, June 30, September 30, December 31, March 31,
2010 2010 2010 2010 2011
Adjusted EBITDA Reconciliation:
Net income $ 157,976 $ 144,282 $ 125,377 $ 128,884 $ 129,001
Interest expense 111,746 121,964 138,116 160,960 190,305
Income tax expense 201 368 475 364 407
Depreciation and amortization 167,177 173,897 181,918 202,543 233,731
Stock-based compensation expense 10,619 10,736 10,669 11,823 9,866
Provision for loan losses 23,121 23,121 52,039 29,684 29,932
Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt 44,822 51,857 34,582 34,171 16,134
Adjusted EBITDA $ 515,662 $ 526,225 $ 543,176 $ 568,429 $ 609,376
Adjusted Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio:
Interest expense $ 111,746 $ 121,964 $ 138,116 $ 160,960 $ 190,305
Capitalized interest 38,381 32,631 26,313 20,792 18,381
Non-cash interest expense (11,967 ) (12,782 ) (14,145 ) (13,945 ) (14,820 )
Secured debt principal payments 10,464 12,612 14,333 16,652 19,180
Preferred dividends 22,064 22,032 21,860 21,645 24,816
Total fixed charges 170,688 176,457 186,477 206,104 237,862
Adjusted EBITDA $ 515,662 $ 526,225 $ 543,176 $ 568,429 $ 609,376
Adjusted fixed
charge coverage
ratio 3.02 x 2.98 x 2.91 x 2.76 x 2.56 x

Folio 43 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Critical Accounting Policies

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, which requires us to make estimates and assumptions. Management considers an accounting estimate or assumption critical if:

| • | the nature of the estimates or assumptions is material due to the levels of subjectivity
and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of
such matters to change; and |
| --- | --- |
| • | the impact of the estimates and assumptions on financial condition or operating
performance is material. |

Management has discussed the development and selection of its critical accounting policies with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee has reviewed the disclosure presented below relating to them. Management believes the current assumptions and other considerations used to estimate amounts reflected in our consolidated financial statements are appropriate and are not reasonably likely to change in the future. However, since these estimates require assumptions to be made that were uncertain at the time the estimate was made, they bear the risk of change. If actual experience differs from the assumptions and other considerations used in estimating amounts reflected in our consolidated financial statements, the resulting changes could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, liquidity and/or financial condition. Please refer to Note 1 to the financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 for further information regarding significant accounting policies that impact us. There have been no material changes to these policies in 2011.

The following table presents information about our critical accounting policies, as well as the material assumptions used to develop each estimate:

Nature of Critical Assumptions/Approach
Accounting Estimate Used
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements
include our accounts, the accounts of our
wholly-owned subsidiaries and the accounts
of joint ventures in which we own a
majority voting interest with the ability
to control operations and where no
substantive participating rights or
substantive kick out rights have been
granted to the noncontrolling interests.
In addition, we consolidate those entities
deemed to be variable interest entities in
which we are determined to be the primary
beneficiary. All material intercompany
transactions and balances have been
eliminated in consolidation. We make judgments about which
entities are VIEs based on an
assessment of whether (i) the
equity investors as a group,
if any, do not have a
controlling financial
interest, or (ii) the equity
investment at risk is
insufficient to finance that
entity’s activities without
additional subordinated
financial support. We make
judgments with respect to our
level of influence or control
of an entity and whether we
are (or are not) the primary
beneficiary of a VIE.
Consideration of various
factors includes, but is not
limited to, our ability to
direct the activities that
most significantly impact the
entity’s economic
performance, our form of
ownership interest, our
representation on the
entity’s governing body, the
size and seniority of our
investment, our ability and
the rights of other investors
to participate in policy
making decisions, replace the
manager and/or liquidate the
entity, if applicable. Our
ability to correctly assess
our influence or control over
an entity at inception of our
involvement or on a
continuous basis when
determining the primary
beneficiary of a VIE affects
the presentation of these
entities in our consolidated
financial statements. When we
perform a primary beneficiary
analysis at a date other than
at inception of the variable
interest entity, our
assumptions may be different
and may result in the
identification of a different
primary beneficiary.
Income Taxes
As part of the process of preparing our
consolidated financial statements,
significant management judgment is
required to evaluate our compliance with
REIT requirements. Our determinations are based
on interpretation of tax
laws, and our conclusions may
have an impact on the income
tax expense recognized.
Adjustments to income tax
expense may be required as a
result of: (i) audits
conducted by federal and
state tax authorities, (ii)
our ability to qualify as a
REIT, (iii) the potential for
built-in-gain recognized
related to prior-tax-free
acquisitions of C
corporations, and (iv)
changes in tax laws.
Adjustments required in any
given period are included in
income.

Folio 44 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Nature of Critical Assumptions/Approach
Accounting Estimate Used
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
We review our long-lived assets for
potential impairment in accordance with U.S.
GAAP. An impairment charge must be
recognized when the carrying value of a
long-lived asset is not recoverable. The
carrying value is not recoverable if it
exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash
flows expected to result from the use and
eventual disposition of the asset. If it is
determined that a permanent impairment of a
long-lived asset has occurred, the carrying
value of the asset is reduced to its fair
value and an impairment charge is recognized
for the difference between the carrying
value and the fair value. The net book value of
long-lived assets is
reviewed quarterly on a
property by property basis
to determine if there are
indicators of impairment.
These indicators may
include anticipated
operating losses at the
property level, the
tenant’s inability to make
rent payments, a decision
to dispose of an asset
before the end of its
estimated useful life and
changes in the market that
may permanently reduce the
value of the property. If
indicators of impairment
exist, then the
undiscounted future cash
flows from the most likely
use of the property are
compared to the current net
book value. This analysis
requires us to determine if
indicators of impairment
exist and to estimate the
most likely stream of cash
flows to be generated from
the property during the
period the property is
expected to be held.
During the three months
ended March 31, 2011, an
impairment charge of
$202,000 was recorded to
reduce the carrying value
of two senior housing
triple-net properties to
their estimated fair value
less costs to sell based on
current sales price
expectations.
Business Combinations
Real property developed by us is recorded at
cost, including the capitalization of
construction period interest. The cost of
real property acquired is allocated to net
tangible and identifiable intangible assets
based on their respective fair values.
Tangible assets primarily consist of land,
buildings and improvements. The remaining
purchase price is allocated among
identifiable intangible assets primarily
consisting of the above or below market
component of in-place leases and the value
of in-place leases. The total amount of
other intangible assets acquired is further
allocated to in-place lease values and
customer relationship values based on
management’s evaluation of the specific
characteristics of each tenant’s lease and
the company’s overall relationship with that
respective tenant. We make estimates as part of our allocation of the purchase price of
acquisitions to the various
components of the
acquisition based upon the
fair value of each
component. The most
significant components of
our allocations are
typically the allocation of
fair value to the buildings
as-if-vacant, land and
in-place leases. In the
case of the fair value of
buildings and the
allocation of value to land
and other intangibles, our
estimates of the values of
these components will
affect the amount of
depreciation and
amortization we record over
the estimated useful life
of the property acquired or
the remaining lease term.
In the case of the value of
in-place leases, we make
our best estimates based on
our evaluation of the
specific characteristics of
each tenant’s lease.
Factors considered include
estimates of carrying costs
during hypothetical
expected lease-up periods,
market conditions and costs
to execute similar leases.
Our assumptions affect the
amount of future revenue
that we will recognize over
the remaining lease term
for the acquired in-place
leases.
We compute depreciation and
amortization on our
properties using the
straight-line method based
on their estimated useful
lives which range from 15
to 40 years for buildings
and five to 15 years for
improvements. Lives for
intangibles are based on
the remaining term of the
underlying leases.
For the three months ended
March 31, 2011, we recorded
$48,377,000, $11,781,000
and $14,610,000 as
provisions for depreciation
and amortization relating
to buildings, improvements
and intangibles,
respectively, including
amounts reclassified as
discontinued operations.
The average useful life of
our buildings, improvements
and intangibles was 38.7
years, 12.5 years and 3.8
years, respectively, for
the three months ended
March 31, 2011.

Folio 45 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Nature of Critical Assumptions/Approach
Accounting Estimate Used
Allowance for Loan Losses
We maintain an allowance for loan losses in
accordance with U.S. GAAP. The allowance for
loan losses is maintained at a level believed
adequate to absorb potential losses in our
loans receivable. The determination of the
allowance is based on a quarterly evaluation of
all outstanding loans. If this evaluation
indicates that there is a greater risk of loan
charge-offs, additional allowances or placement
on non-accrual status may be required. A loan
is impaired when, based on current information
and events, it is probable that we will be
unable to collect all amounts due as scheduled
according to the contractual terms of the
original loan agreement. Consistent with this
definition, all loans on non-accrual are deemed
impaired. To the extent circumstances improve
and the risk of collectability is diminished,
we will return these loans to full accrual
status. The determination of the
allowance is based on a
quarterly evaluation of
all outstanding loans,
including general
economic conditions and
estimated collectability
of loan payments and
principal. We evaluate
the collectability of our
loans receivable based on
a combination of factors,
including, but not
limited to, delinquency
status, historical loan
charge-offs, financial
strength of the borrower
and guarantors and value
of the underlying
property. As a result of our
quarterly evaluations, we
recorded $248,000 of
provision for loan losses
during the three months
ended March 31, 2011,
resulting in an allowance
for loan losses of
$1,524,000 relating to
real estate loans with
outstanding balances of
$9,478,000, all of which
were on non-accrual
status at March 31, 2011.
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
The valuation of derivative instruments is
accounted for in accordance with U.S. GAAP,
which requires companies to record derivatives
at fair market value on the balance sheet as
assets or liabilities. The valuation of
derivative instruments
requires us to make
estimates and judgments
that affect the fair
value of the instruments.
Fair values for our
derivatives are estimated
by utilizing pricing
models that consider
forward yield curves and
discount rates. Such
amounts and the
recognition of such
amounts are subject to
significant estimates
which may change in the
future. At March 31,
2011, we participated in
one interest rate swap
agreement which is
reported at its fair
value of $379,000 in
other liabilities.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue is recorded in accordance with U.S.
GAAP, which requires that revenue be recognized
after four basic criteria are met. These four
criteria include persuasive evidence of an
arrangement, the rendering of service, fixed
and determinable income and reasonably assured
collectability. If the collectability of
revenue is determined incorrectly, the amount
and timing of our reported revenue could be
significantly affected. Interest income on
loans is recognized as earned based upon the
principal amount outstanding subject to an
evaluation of collectability risk.
Substantially all of our operating leases
contain fixed and/or contingent escalating rent
structures. Leases with fixed annual rental
escalators are generally recognized on a
straight-line basis over the initial lease
period, subject to a collectability assessment.
Rental income related to leases with contingent
rental escalators is generally recorded based
on the contractual cash rental payments due for
the period. We recognize resident fees and
services, other than move in fees, monthly as
services are provided. Move in fees, which are
a component of resident fees and services, are
recognized on a straight-line basis over the
term of the applicable lease agreement. Lease
agreements with residents generally have a term
of one year and are cancelable by the resident
with 30 days’ notice. We evaluate the collectibility of our revenues and related
receivables on an
on-going basis. We
evaluate collectibility
based on assumptions and
other considerations
including, but not
limited to, the certainty
of payment, payment
history, the financial
strength of the
investment’s underlying
operations as measured by
cash flows and payment
coverages, the value of
the underlying collateral
and guaranties and
current economic
conditions. If our evaluation
indicates that
collectibility is not
reasonably assured, we
may place an investment
on non-accrual or reserve
against all or a portion
of current income as an
offset to revenue. For the three months
ended March 31, 2011, we
recognized $11,709,000 of
interest income,
$71,286,000 of resident
fees and services, and
$172,062,000 of rental
income, including
discontinued operations.
Cash receipts on leases
with deferred revenue
provisions were
$3,612,000 as compared to
gross straight-line
rental income recognized
of $5,030,000 for the
three months ended March
31, 2011. At March 31,
2011, our straight-line
receivable balance was
$88,405,000, net of
reserves totaling
$265,000. Also at March
31, 2011, we had real
estate loans with
outstanding balances of
$9,478,000 on non-accrual
status.

Folio 46 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements and Risk Factors

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may contain “forward-looking” statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements concern and are based upon, among other things, the possible expansion of the company’s portfolio; the sale of properties; the performance of its operators/tenants and properties; its ability to enter into agreements with viable new tenants for vacant space or for properties that the company takes back from financially troubled tenants, if any; its occupancy rates; its ability to acquire, develop and/or manage properties; its ability to make distributions to stockholders; its policies and plans regarding investments, financings and other matters; its tax status as a real estate investment trust; its critical accounting policies; its ability to appropriately balance the use of debt and equity; its ability to access capital markets or other sources of funds; and its ability to meet its earnings guidance. When the company uses words such as “may,” “will,” “intend,” “should,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “project,” “estimate” or similar expressions, it is making forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties. The company’s expected results may not be achieved, and actual results may differ materially from expectations. This may be a result of various factors, including, but not limited to: the status of the economy; the status of capital markets, including availability and cost of capital; issues facing the health care industry, including compliance with, and changes to, regulations and payment policies, responding to government investigations and punitive settlements and operators’/tenants’ difficulty in cost-effectively obtaining and maintaining adequate liability and other insurance; changes in financing terms; competition within the health care, senior housing and life science industries; negative developments in the operating results or financial condition of operators/tenants, including, but not limited to, their ability to pay rent and repay loans; the company’s ability to transition or sell facilities with profitable results; the failure to make new investments as and when anticipated; acts of God affecting the company’s properties; the company’s ability to re-lease space at similar rates as vacancies occur; the company’s ability to timely reinvest sale proceeds at similar rates to assets sold; operator/tenant or joint venture partner bankruptcies or insolvencies; the cooperation of joint venture partners; government regulations affecting Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement rates and operational requirements; regulatory approval and market acceptance of the products and technologies of life science tenants; liability or contract claims by or against operators/tenants; unanticipated difficulties and/or expenditures relating to future acquisitions; environmental laws affecting the company’s properties; changes in rules or practices governing the company’s financial reporting; and legal and operational matters, including real estate investment trust qualification and key management personnel recruitment and retention. Other important factors are identified in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 including factors identified under the headings “Business,” “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Finally, the company assumes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements or to update the reasons why actual results could differ from those projected in any forward-looking statements.

Folio 47 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We are exposed to various market risks, including the potential loss arising from adverse changes in interest rates. We seek to mitigate the effects of fluctuations in interest rates by matching the terms of new investments with new long-term fixed rate borrowings to the extent possible. We may or may not elect to use financial derivative instruments to hedge interest rate exposure. These decisions are principally based on our policy to match our variable rate investments with comparable borrowings, but are also based on the general trend in interest rates at the applicable dates and our perception of the future volatility of interest rates. This section is presented to provide a discussion of the risks associated with potential fluctuations in interest rates.

We historically borrow on our unsecured line of credit arrangement to acquire, construct or make loans relating to health care and senior housing properties. Then, as market conditions dictate, we will issue equity or long-term fixed rate debt to repay the borrowings under the unsecured line of credit arrangement.

A change in interest rates will not affect the interest expense associated with our fixed rate debt. Interest rate changes, however, will affect the fair value of our fixed rate debt. Changes in the interest rate environment upon maturity of this fixed rate debt could have an effect on our future cash flows and earnings, depending on whether the debt is replaced with other fixed rate debt, variable rate debt or equity or repaid by the sale of assets. To illustrate the impact of changes in the interest rate markets, we performed a sensitivity analysis on our fixed rate debt instruments whereby we modeled the change in net present values arising from a hypothetical 1% increase in interest rates to determine the instruments’ change in fair value. The following table summarizes the analysis performed as of the dates indicated (in thousands):

March 31, 2011 — Principal Change in December 31, 2010 — Principal Change in
balance fair value balance fair value
Senior unsecured notes $ 4,464,930 $ (357,480 ) $ 3,064,930 $ (248,884 )
Secured debt 1,511,202 4,138 1,030,070 (51,973 )
Totals $ 5,976,132 $ (353,342 ) $ 4,095,000 $ (300,857 )

On December 31, 2010, we assumed an interest rate swap (the “December 2010 Swap”) for a total notional amount of $12,650,000 to hedge interest payments associated with long-term LIBOR based borrowings. The December 2010 Swap has an effective date of December 31, 2010 and a maturity date of December 31, 2013. The December 2010 Swap has the economic effect of fixing $12,650,000 at 5.50% plus a credit spread through the swap’s maturity. In January 2011, the December 2010 Swap was designated as a cash flow hedge and we expect it to be highly effective at offsetting changes in cash flows of interest payments on $12,650,000 of long-term debt due to changes in the LIBOR swap rate.

Our variable rate debt, including our unsecured line of credit arrangement, is reflected at fair value. At March 31, 2011, we had $0 outstanding related to our variable rate line of credit and $180,504,000 outstanding related to our variable rate secured debt. Assuming no changes in outstanding balances, a 1% increase in interest rates would result in increased annual interest expense of $1,805,000. At December 31, 2010, we had $300,000,000 outstanding related to our variable rate line of credit and $103,645,000 outstanding related to our variable rate secured debt. Assuming no changes in outstanding balances, a 1% increase in interest rates would have resulted in increased annual interest expense of $4,036,000.

We are subject to risks associated with debt financing, including the risk that existing indebtedness may not be refinanced or that the terms of refinancing may not be as favorable as the terms of current indebtedness. The majority of our borrowings were completed under indentures or contractual agreements that limit the amount of indebtedness we may incur. Accordingly, in the event that we are unable to raise additional equity or borrow money because of these limitations, our ability to acquire additional properties may be limited.

For additional information regarding fair values of financial instruments, see “Item 7 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Critical Accounting Policies” and Note 16 to our consolidated financial statements.

Folio 48 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Our management, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in providing reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file with or submit to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. No changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the fiscal quarter covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Except as provided in “Item 2 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Forward Looking Statements and Risk Factors,” there have been no material changes from the risk factors identified under the heading “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Total Number Total Number of Shares — Purchased as Part of Maximum Number of — Shares that May Yet Be
of Shares Average Price Paid Publicly Announced Plans Purchased Under the Plans
Period Purchased (1) Per Share or Programs (2) or Programs
January 1, 2011 through January 31, 2011 44,123 $ 47.45
February 1, 2011 through February 28, 2011
March 1, 2011 through March 31, 2011 678 50.64
Totals 44,801 $ 47.49

| (1) | During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the company acquired shares of common stock held by employees who tendered owned shares to satisfy
the tax withholding on the lapse of certain restrictions on restricted stock. |
| --- | --- |
| (2) | No shares were purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs. |

Item 5. Other Information

On May 10, 2011, we filed a revised Certificate of Designation with the Secretary of State of Delaware for the 6% Series H Cumulative Convertible and Redeemable Preferred Stock (the “Series H Preferred Stock”), a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 3.1 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, to correct the dividend rate provided therein. The annual dividend on each share of Series H Preferred Stock is $2.8584 and is payable, when, as and if declared by our board of directors, quarterly in arrears on or about the 15th day of January, April, July and October.

Folio 49 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Item 6. Exhibits

| 3.1 | Certificate of Designation of 6% Series H Cumulative Convertible and Redeemable Preferred
Stock of the company. |
| --- | --- |
| 3.2 | Certificate of Designation of 6.50% Series I Cumulative Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock
of the company (filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as Exhibit 3.1 to the
company’s Form 8-K filed March 7, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference thereto). |
| 3.3 | Third Amended and Restated By-Laws of the company (filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission as Exhibit 3.1 to the company’s Form 8-K filed March 17, 2011, and incorporated
herein by reference thereto). |
| 4.1 | Indenture, dated as of March 15, 2010, between the company and The Bank of New York Mellon
Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (the “Trustee”) (filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission as Exhibit 4.1 to the company’s Form 8-K filed March 15, 2010, and incorporated
herein by reference thereto). |
| 4.2 | Supplemental Indenture No. 5, dated as of March 14, 2011, between the company and the Trustee
(filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as Exhibit 4.2 to the company’s Form 8-K
filed March 14, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference thereto). |
| 10.1 | Equity Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 28, 2011, by and among the company, FC-GEN
Investment, LLC and FC-GEN Operations Investment, LLC (filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission as Exhibit 10.1 to the company’s Form 8-K filed February 28, 2011, and incorporated
herein by reference thereto). |
| 12 | Statement Regarding Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Ratio of Earnings
to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends (unaudited) |
| 31.1 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer. |
| 31.2 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer. |
| 32.1 | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 by Chief Executive Officer. |
| 32.2 | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 by Chief Financial Officer. |
| 101.INS | XBRL Instance Document |
| 101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
|
| 101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
| 101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
|
| 101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
| 101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
|

| * |
| --- |
| Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files
on Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed or part of a registration
statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those
sections. |

Folio 50 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

Date: May 10, 2011 HEALTH CARE REIT, INC. — By: /s/ GEORGE L. CHAPMAN
George L. Chapman,
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: May 10, 2011 By: /s/ SCOTT A. ESTES
Scott A. Estes,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Date: May 10, 2011 By: /s/ PAUL D. NUNGESTER, JR.
Paul D. Nungester, Jr.,
Vice President and Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)

Folio 51 /Folio