AI assistant
WEEBIT NANO LTD — Interim / Quarterly Report 2011
Apr 20, 2011
66042_rns_2011-04-20_7a48dc92-2672-44d2-aeca-0332f1778715.pdf
Interim / Quarterly Report
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
==> picture [162 x 69] intentionally omitted <==
ACN 146 455 576
Quarterly Activities Report For the Three Months Ended 31 March 2011
Highlights
Exploration
- RC drilling of magnetite and hematite targets at Johnston Range provides encouraging results with significant intervals of magnetite mineralisation intersected
ASX Release
21 April 2011
Suite 2, 12 Parliament Place West Perth WA 6005 PO BOX 902 West Perth WA 6872
P + 61 8 9482 0580 F + 61 8 9482 0505 E [email protected] W www.radariron.com.au
-
Field mapping and reconnaissance continues to identify additional hematite prospects
-
Independent geophysical review of Johnston Range Project confirms large scale target magnetite mineralisation potential
-
Acquisition of a significant package of iron mineralisation rights in Central Yilgarn – substantially increase footprint and potential
Corporate
-
Entitlements Issue of Options currently being finalised.
-
Cash Position of $4.75m
Overview
The board of Radar Iron Ltd (“Radar”) is pleased to present its quarterly activities report for the quarter ended 31 March 2011. Radar is focused on identifying and defining hematite and magnetite resources in the Central Yilgarn district of Western Australia.
Contact
Jonathan Lea Managing Director E [email protected]
Phillip Wingate Company Secretary E [email protected]
Directors
Alan Tough - Chairman Jonathan Lea - Managing Director Ananda Kathiravelu - Non-Executive
Issued Capital
61,880,112 Ordinary Shares 22,750,000 Unlisted Options
ASX Code
Following the Company’s successful float in December 2010, Radar has been actively exploring its tenement holding.
During the March Quarter a second drill campaign was completed aimed at the initial testing of the hematite and magnetite targets at Johnson Range. Encouraging results were obtained enabling the better targeting of future drilling.
A geophysical review of the Johnston Range tenement holding reinforced the massive potential for magnetite mineralisation.
Agreement was reached to acquire a significant package of iron ore rights on tenements in the Central Yilgarn – significantly increasing Radar’s footprint and providing further exposure to tenements highly prospective for iron mineralisation.
Radar’s overall exploration objectives in 2011 are to focus on defining initial hematite and magnetite resources and to continue to assess the large tenement holding for further prospects. Following resource identification it is planned to commence scoping or feasibility studies to enable rapid progress towards mining.
RAD (Fully Paid Ordinary Shares)
Media Enquiries:
Fortbridge +612 9331 0655 Luke Dean 0414 535 433
==> picture [129 x 11] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [596 x 11] intentionally omitted <==
Quarterly Activities Report For the Three Months Ended 31 March 2011
==> picture [347 x 299] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 1: Project Area
Iron Rights Acquisition
Radar agreed to acquire a significant package of iron ore rights from Southern Cross Goldfields Ltd (SXG) in the central Yilgarn iron district of WA in February 2011.
The iron rights, covered by tenement holdings of 913 km[2] , more than triples Radar’s current land position (previously around 300 km[2] ). SXG will continue to hold the tenement titles with Radar having the right to access, explore and exploit all iron and associated minerals. Over 80 linear kilometres of banded iron formation (BIF) has been identified on the tenements. The ground has had limited exploration for iron mineralisation in the past and is considered highly prospective for direct shipping hematite ores and magnetite mineralisation.
The tenements are adjacent to some of the key iron ore production centres in the area at Jackson Range and Windarling adjacent to infrastructure such as the open access rail line to the south.
The terms of the acquisition were:
-
a cash payment of $1.5M;
-
1,000,000 shares in Radar, and;
-
the non iron ore rights to Radar’s tenements E77/1280, E77/1281 and E77/1807.
Radar has completed due diligence and made an initial payment of $500,000. The balance owing ($1M) will be paid following completion (subject to an agreement defining joint mineral rights currently in preparation) now expected in May.
Radar intends to commence initial exploration over this ground in the June quarter testing both the hematite and magnetite potential. It is likely aero-magnetic data will acquired initially to facilitate target identification.
==> picture [129 x 11] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [596 x 10] intentionally omitted <==
Quarterly Activities Report For the Three Months Ended 31 March 2011
==> picture [276 x 370] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 2: Iron Rights Acquisition
Exploration Summary – March Quarter
Radar’s exploration focus in the March Quarter was on two of the three original project areas, Johnston Range and Die Hardy, (Figure 3). Work at the third project area, Evanston, was confined to data review.
Aboriginal heritage clearance surveys and flora surveys were completed at Johnson Range and Die Hardy to enable future drilling approvals. A Conservation Management Plan (CMP) was completed for the region. This document again assists in streamlining future exploration approvals. Programme of Works approvals were submitted to the Department of Minerals and Petroleum and approvals were gained for a number of targets.
An RC drilling programme (1978 metres) was completed at Johnston Range to provide geological and stratigraphic information and to commence testing of hematite and magnetite targets. Regional mapping of the BIF was also completed on this project area to aid in target identification for both hematite and magnetite.
A geophysical review of the aero-magnetic data covering its Johnston Range project was completed by independent geophysical consultants aimed at identifying areas in the 35km Johnston Range banded iron formation (BIF) with greater potential to host significant mineralisation and to better define exploration targets. A global target exploration potential for magnetite mineralisation was estimated to be 4.0Bt - 6.7Bt at 20-45% Fe
Radar Iron advises that the potential quantity and grade of iron deposits reported as exploration target potential is conceptual in nature and there has been insufficient exploration to define a Mineral Resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the determination of a Mineral Resource.
==> picture [129 x 11] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [596 x 10] intentionally omitted <==
Quarterly Activities Report For the Three Months Ended 31 March 2011
Additional regional geological reconnaissance review was completed over many of the existing and new project areas which again reinforced the prospectivity of the holding to contain iron mineralisation
==> picture [307 x 407] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
.
----- End of picture text -----
Figure 3: Project Location
Exploration Detail – March Quarter
Johnston Range
Mapping in January at Johnston Range utilising a consultant mapping specialist confirmed the presence of enriched banded iron formations that form a number of hematite targets. Assessment and prioritisation of these targets continues prior to drill testing.
A geophysical review of the aero-magnetic data covering its Johnston Range project was completed by independent geophysical consultants, Resource Potentials of Perth and was aimed at identifying areas in the 35km Johnston Range banded iron formation (BIF) with greater potential to host significant mineralisation and to better define exploration targets.
==> picture [129 x 11] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [596 x 10] intentionally omitted <==
Quarterly Activities Report
For the Three Months Ended 31 March 2011
The results were:
-
1 Primary Magnetite BIF: 4.0Bt - 6.7Bt at 20-45% Fe
-
2 Potential Enriched Material: 370Mt - 617Mt at 40-65% Fe
-
3 Total Exploration Potential: 4.4Bt - 7.3Bt at 20-65% Fe
Radar Iron advises that the potential quantity and grade of iron deposits reported as exploration target potential is conceptual in nature and there has been insufficient exploration to define a Mineral Resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the determination of a Mineral Resource.
The RC drilling programme at Johnston Range was undertaken in February 2011 and comprised 20 holes for 1978m. The aim of the drilling was to provide geological and stratigraphic information, to test previously defined hematite targets and to obtain metallurgical samples from the magnetite targets. Drilling data is shown in Table 1 with assay results in Tables 2 and 3.
Five hematite targets were tested, with the Rowling prospect returning the best results – 16m at 55.7% Fe (full details in Table 2). The Rowling results indicate that the BIF has been enriched in places to economic grades and that the potential to define economic hematite mineralisation in the Johnston Range project area remains high.
While a number of the more obvious targets were tested by first pass drilling, the potential for hematite mineralisation remains high with numerous outcropping and buried anomalies remaining to be tested. The current expectation for hematite mineralisation in the Johnston Range area is for a number of relatively small bodies that will accumulate to provide a critical tonnage sufficient to justify mining.
==> picture [316 x 312] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 4: Johnston Range – Drill hole location
==> picture [129 x 11] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [596 x 10] intentionally omitted <==
Quarterly Activities Report For the Three Months Ended 31 March 2011
TABLE 1 Drill Hole Data
| Drill Hole Number |
Drill Hole Data and Location | Drill Hole Data and Location | Drill Hole Data and Location | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prospect | Length | East | North | Dip | Azimuth | |
| RIRC012 | Dang | 54 | 728922 | 6717322 | ‐60 | 305 |
| RIRC013 | Dang | 90 | 728920 | 6717323 | ‐60 | 125 |
| RIRC014 | Dang | 120 | 728941 | 6717291 | ‐60 | 305 |
| RIRC015 | Dang | 96 | 728808 | 6717124 | ‐60 | 305 |
| RIRC016 | Muldoon | 72 | 713228 | 6711679 | ‐60 | 250 |
| RIRC017 | Muldoon | 96 | 713192 | 6711874 | ‐60 | 250 |
| RIRC018 | Muldoon | 120 | 713047 | 6712670 | ‐60 | 250 |
| RIRC019 | Muldoon | 114 | 713070 | 6712677 | ‐60 | 70 |
| RIRC020 | Rowling | 96 | 711962 | 6713412 | ‐60 | 100 |
| RIRC021 | Rowling | 126 | 712021 | 6713428 | ‐60 | 100 |
| RIRC022 | Rowling | 138 | 712042 | 6713430 | ‐60 | 110 |
| RIRC023 | Rowling | 60 | 712028 | 6713432 | ‐60 | 280 |
| RIRC024 | Rowling | 88 | 711996 | 6713423 | ‐60 | 100 |
| RIRC025 | Clutch | 78 | 726256 | 6710465 | ‐60 | 305 |
| RIRC026 | Lange | 114 | 726720 | 6715268 | ‐60 | 125 |
| RIRC027 | Lange | 150 | 726706 | 6715284 | ‐55 | 305 |
| RIRC028 | Lange | 72 | 726746 | 6715241 | ‐60 | 125 |
| RIRC029 | Lange | 36 | 726742 | 6715245 | ‐60 | 305 |
| RIRC030 | Dang | 108 | 728494 | 6716798 | ‐60 | 125 |
| RIRC031 | Dang | 150 | 728506 | 6716774 | ‐60 | 305 |
Notes:
Coordinates MGA94 Zone 50
TABLE 2 Hematite Assay Results
| Prospect | Drill Hole Number |
Intercepts ‐ | Intercepts ‐ | Average Weighted Grades | Average Weighted Grades | Average Weighted Grades | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| From | To | Length | % Fe | % SiO2 | % Al2O3 | % P | %S | LOI | ||
| Dang | RIRC013 | 4 | 10 | 6 | 56.0 | 11.2 | 3.09 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 5.90 |
| Rowling | RIRC021 | 0 | 30 | 30 | 53.1 | 10.7 | 4.23 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 9.00 |
| Rowling | RIRC023 | 2 | 18 | 16 | 55.7 | 8.5 | 2.34 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 8.80 |
| Rowling | RIRC024 | 16 | 26 | 10 | 56.0 | 6.3 | 3.53 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 9.14 |
Note:
Assaying on 2m sample intervals Assaying (XRF) completed by Spectrolab, Geraldton 50% Fe cut‐off applied Maximum of 4m internal dilution
==> picture [129 x 11] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [596 x 10] intentionally omitted <==
Quarterly Activities Report
For the Three Months Ended 31 March 2011
TABLE 3 Magnetite Assay Results
| Prospect | Drill Hole Number |
Intercepts ‐ | Intercepts ‐ | Average Weighted Grades | Average Weighted Grades | Average Weighted Grades | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| From | To | Length | % Fe | % SiO2 | % Al2O3 | % P | %S | LOI | ||
| Dang | RIRC013 | 28 | 50 | 22 | 34.1 | 49.2 | 0.61 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 2.56 |
| Dang | RIRC014 | 74 | 120 | 46 | 33.4 | 45.9 | 1.20 | 0.06 | 0.11 | 1.74 |
| Dang | RIRC015 | 82 | 96 | 14 | 33.8 | 45.3 | 1.12 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 2.03 |
| Muldoon | RIRC017 | 54 | 86 | 32 | 37.1 | 45.3 | 0.31 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 2.02 |
| Muldoon | RIRC018 | 66 | 106 | 40 | 34.9 | 45.6 | 0.85 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.17 |
| Muldoon | RIRC019 | 64 | 106 | 42 | 35.2 | 46.1 | 0.52 | 0.07 | 0.04 | ‐0.57 |
| Rowling | RIRC021 | 48 | 118 | 70 | 33.0 | 46.8 | 2.02 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 1.21 |
| Rowling | RIRC022 | 40 | 138 | 98 | 33.6 | 46.0 | 1.45 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 1.11 |
| Rowling | RIRC024 | 78 | 88 | 10 | 37.8 | 39.9 | 0.64 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 5.34 |
| Lange | RIRC026 | 76 | 90 | 14 | 30.6 | 46.5 | 2.72 | 0.05 | 0.12 | 4.93 |
| Dang | RIRC030 | 86 | 100 | 14 | 31.0 | 44.0 | 2.76 | 0.06 | 0.11 | 4.86 |
| Dang | RIRC031 | 66 | 150 | 84 | 33.9 | 46.0 | 0.59 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 2.01 |
Note: Assaying on 2m sample intervals Assaying (XRF) completed by Spectrolab, Geraldton 20% Fe cut‐off applied Maximum of 4m internal dilution
Following on from the geophysical review of the exploration potential for magnetite at Johnston Range three of the more prominent magnetite zones were drill tested during the February drill campaign. The aim was to establish the potential size of the BIF mineralisation and to obtain initial samples for DTR testing.
Significant widths of magnetite were intercepted (best result 98m at 33.6% Fe) with average grades around 3334% Fe. The results (Table 3) reinforce the large exploration potential as defined recently for magnetite mineralisation.
The results were highly encouraging with 3 zones identified with estimated thicknesses of 80-150m with grades consistently above 30% Fe. The potential length of each mineralised zone (Lange, Muldoon and Rowling) is 4-5 km containing 3-4 BIF units oriented approximately parallel to each other within each zone. Testing has only been completed on one or two of the units at each location.
Metallurgical assessment is ongoing through DTR (Davis Tube Recovery) testing with consultancy firm Calibre Global being retained to review results and provide guidance for ongoing test work.
Drilling approvals are currently being sought to enable commencement of definitive testing of magnetite targets, aimed at JORC resource estimation later in the year.
Ethnographic and botanical surveys were completed to facilitate further drilling approvals for the hematite and magnetite mineralisation at Johnson Range. Some drilling approvals are already in place and others are expected in the June Quarter.
On this basis, a major drill programme is scheduled to commence in April to further test hematite and magnetite targets and commence the resource definition process.
==> picture [129 x 11] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [596 x 10] intentionally omitted <==
Quarterly Activities Report
For the Three Months Ended 31 March 2011
Die Hardy Project
The Lara prospect forms a prominent ridge approximately 3.4km long and 200-300m wide dipping sub-vertically. The two holes drilled in 2010 support the interpreted width and depth potential and the initial assay and DTR results from the drilling were highly encouraging. Further DTR test work is ongoing and drilling is planned for 2011. Lara is clearly the highest priority magnetite target identified to date given the interpreted size and encouraging metallurgical properties.
Lara is located in a Class C conservation Park. Hence the programme of works (PoW) process can take longer subject to the requirements of the regulators. The process has commenced and drill testing will commence after approvals are obtained (expected in May/June). Part of the western end of the prospect is covered by a registered aboriginal site. This will not prevent drill testing of the western half of the prospect in the short term and a Section 18 process has commenced to obtain drill approvals over the remaining area.
During the reporting quarter, environmental flora surveys and an ethnographic heritage clearance were completed to facilitate the planned drilling.
==> picture [374 x 388] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 4: Die Hardy – Lara Prospect and Drill hole location
==> picture [129 x 11] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [596 x 10] intentionally omitted <==
Quarterly Activities Report
For the Three Months Ended 31 March 2011
Regional Exploration
Following the acquisition of the SXG iron rights in the region, regional geological reconnaissance was completed. A number of areas have been identified as containing outcropping hematite mineralisation and magnetite potential is widespread. Data compilation will be undertaken over all the new ground in conjunction with further field reconnaissance. A geophysical review of the new ground has commenced and it is planned to acquire aeromagnetic data in coming months to and possibly gravity data to assist in target definition. Any prospects identified will be drill tested as warranted commencing later in 2011.
Corporate
Radar Iron’s entitlement issue of options has now closed. The Company is currently reconciling subscriptions and will notify the market of the results once complete.
Radar’s cash position at the end of the quarter was $4.75 million.
Announcements
The Company made the following announcements during the quarter.
| Date | Headline |
|---|---|
| 22/03/2011 | Non-RenounceableEntitlementsIssueProspectus |
| 22/03/2011 | Shareholder Notice- Non-RenounceableEntitlementsIssue |
| 22/03/2011 | Non-RenounceableEntitlementsIssue andAppendix3B |
| 21/03/2011 | Investor Presentationand CorporateFlyer |
| 16/03/2011 | ExplorationUpdate |
| 10/03/2011 | Completionof DueDiligence on Iron RightsAcquisition |
| 25/02/2011 | Half Year Accounts |
| 16/02/2011 | TRH: RAD - Major AcquisitionofCentral Yilgarn Iron Rights |
| 16/02/2011 | Major AcquisitionofCentral Yilgarn Iron Rights |
| 16/02/2011 | SXG:Sale of Non-CoreIronOreAssets toRadar Iron |
| 2/02/2011 | Radar IronQuarterlyBriefingPresentation |
| 1/02/2011 | Exploration Potentialat Johnston RangeAmendment |
| 31/01/2011 | QuarterlyActivities and Cashflow Report |
| 31/01/2011 | Exploration Potentialof5Billiontonnes at Johnston Range |
| 28/01/2011 | Radar Iron Research Report- RM Research |
| 20/01/2011 | Boardroom RadioInterview withJonathan Lea |
| 19/01/2011 | Maiden MagnetiteDrill Results |
| 18/01/2011 | TradingHalt |
| 11/01/2011 | 2011 Exploration Programme |
For or on behalf of Radar Iron Ltd
Jonathan Lea
Managing Director
The information in this report accurately reflects information prepared by competent persons (as defined by the Australasian Code for Reporting of Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves). It is compiled by Mr Jonathan Lea, an employee of the Company who is a Member of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy with the requisite experience in the field of activity in which he is reporting. Mr Lea has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and the type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent person as defined in the 2004 Edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves”. Mr Lea consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.
The potential quantity and grade of iron deposits reported as exploration potential is conceptual in nature and there has been insufficient exploration to define a Mineral Resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the determination of a Mineral Resource.
==> picture [129 x 11] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [596 x 10] intentionally omitted <==
Appendix 5B Mining exploration entity quarterly report
Appendix 5B
Mining exploration entity quarterly report
Introduced 1/7/96. Origin: Appendix 8. Amended 1/7/97, 1/7/98, 30/9/2001.
Name of entity
Radar Iron Limited
| ABN 146 455 576 |
Quarter ended (“current quarter”) |
|---|---|
| 146 455 576 | 31 March 2011 |
Consolidated statement of cash flows
| Cash flows related to operating activities 1.1 Receipts from product sales and related debtors 1.2 Payments for (a) exploration and evaluation (b) development (c) production (d) administration 1.3 Dividends received 1.4 Interest and other items of a similar nature received 1.5 Interest and other costs of finance paid 1.6 Income taxes paid 1.7 Other (provide details if material) Net Operating Cash Flows |
Current quarter $A’000 |
Year to date (9 months) $A’000 |
|---|---|---|
| - (626) - - (314) - 33 - - - |
- (799) - - (426) - 58 - - - |
|
| (907) | (1,167) | |
| Cash flows related to investing activities 1.8 Payment for purchases of: (a)prospects (b)equity investments (c) other fixed assets 1.9 Proceeds from sale of: (a)prospects (b)equity investments (c)other fixed assets 1.10 Loans to other entities 1.11 Loans repaid by other entities 1.12 Other (provide details if material) – Cash acquired on acquisition of subsidiary Net investing cash flows 1.13 Total operating and investing cash flows (carried forward) |
(550) - (72) - - - - - - |
(550) (120)* (84) - - - - - 18 |
| (622) | (736) | |
| (1,529) | (1,903) |
- Cash paid in acquisition of Radar Resources Pty Ltd, as disclosed in the Prospectus dated 5 Nov 2010.
Appendix 5B Mining exploration entity quarterly report
| 1.13 Total operating and investing cash flows (brought forward) |
(1,529) | (1,903) |
|---|---|---|
| Cash flows related to financing activities 1.14 Proceeds from issues of shares, options, etc. 1.15 Proceeds from sale of forfeited shares 1.16 Proceeds from borrowings 1.17 Repayment of borrowings 1.18 Dividends paid 1.19 Other - Capital Raising Costs |
- - - - - - |
7,323 - - - - (669) |
| Net financing cash flows | - | 6,654 |
| Net increase (decrease) in cash held 1.20 Cash at beginning of quarter/year to date 1.21 Exchange rate adjustments to item 1.20 1.22 Cash at end of quarter |
(1,529) 6,280 - |
4,751 - - |
| 4,751 | 4,751 |
Payments to directors of the entity and associates of the directors Payments to related entities of the entity and associates of the related entities
| 1.23 1.24 |
Aggregate amount of payments to the parties included in item 1.2 Aggregate amount of loans to the parties included in item 1.10 |
Current quarter $A'000 |
|---|---|---|
| 103 | ||
| Nil | ||
| 1.25 | Explanation necessaryfor an understandingof the transactions | |
| Amounts paid to directors includes salaries and wages for director services. |
Non-cash financing and investing activities
2.1
- 2.2 Details of outlays made by other entities to establish or increase their share in projects in which the reporting entity has an interest
Financing facilities available
Add notes as necessary for an understanding of the position.
| 3.1 Loan facilities 3.2 Credit standby arrangements |
Amount available $A’000 |
Amount used $A’000 |
|---|---|---|
| - | - |
|
| - | - |
Appendix 5B Mining exploration entity quarterly report
Estimated cash outflows for next quarter
| Estimated cash outflows for next quarter | |
|---|---|
| 4.1 Exploration and evaluation 4.2 Development 4.3 Production 4.4 Administration |
$A’000 |
| 900 | |
| - | |
| - | |
| 150 | |
| Total | 1,050 |
Reconciliation of cash
| Reconciliation of cash | ||
|---|---|---|
| Reconciliation of cash at the end of the quarter (as shown in the consolidated statement of cash flows) to the related items in the accounts is as follows. |
Current quarter $A’000 |
Previous quarter $A’000 |
| 5.1 Cash on hand and at bank 5.2 Deposits at call 5.3 Bank overdraft 5.4 Other (provide details) |
1,751 | 6,280 |
| 3,000 | - | |
| - | - | |
| - | - | |
| Total: cash at end of quarter(item 1.22) | 4,751 | 6,280 |
Changes in interests in mining tenements
| 6.1 Interests in mining tenements relinquished, reduced or lapsed 6.2 Interests in mining tenements acquired or increased |
Tenement reference | Nature of interest (note (2)) |
Interest at beginning of quarter |
Interest at end of quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Appendix 5B Mining exploration entity quarterly report
Issued and quoted securities at end of current quarter
Description includes rate of interest and any redemption or conversion rights together with prices and dates.
| Total number | Number quoted | Issue price per security (see note 3) (cents) |
Amount paid up per security (see note 3) (cents) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.1 Preference+securities (description) 7.2 Changes during quarter (a) Increases through issues (b) Decreases through returns of capital, buy- backs,redemptions |
||||
| 7.3 +Ordinary securities 7.4 Changes during quarter (a) Increases through issues (b) Decreases through returns of capital, buy-backs |
61,880,112 | 36,614,500 | ||
| 7.5 +Convertible debt securities(description) 7.6 Changes during quarter (a) Increases through issues (b) Decreases through securities matured, converted |
||||
| 7.7 Options (description and conversion factor) Total 7.8 Issued during quarter 7.9 Exercised during quarter 7.10 Expired during quarter |
20,375,000 2,375,000 22,750,000 |
- - |
Exercise price 25 cents 30 cents |
Exercise date 30/11/13 31/05/14 |
| 7.11 Debentures (totals only) |
||||
| 7.12 Unsecured notes (totals only) |
Appendix 5B Mining exploration entity quarterly report
Compliance statement
1 This statement has been prepared under accounting policies which comply with accounting standards as defined in the Corporations Act or other standards acceptable to ASX (see note 4).
- 2 This statement does give a true and fair view of the matters disclosed.
Sign here: (Director/ Company secretary )
Date: 21 April 2011
Print name: Phillip Wingate
Notes
1 The quarterly report provides a basis for informing the market how the entity’s activities have been financed for the past quarter and the effect on its cash position. An entity wanting to disclose additional information is encouraged to do so, in a note or notes attached to this report.
2 The “Nature of interest” (items 6.1 and 6.2) includes options in respect of interests in mining tenements acquired, exercised or lapsed during the reporting period. If the entity is involved in a joint venture agreement and there are conditions precedent which will change its percentage interest in a mining tenement, it should disclose the change of percentage interest and conditions precedent in the list required for items 6.1 and 6.2.
3 Issued and quoted securities The issue price and amount paid up is not required in items 7.1 and 7.3 for fully paid securities .
4 The definitions in, and provisions of, AASB 6: Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources and AASB 107: Cash Flow Statements apply to this report.
5 Accounting Standards ASX will accept, for example, the use of International Accounting Standards for foreign entities. If the standards used do not address a topic, the Australian standard on that topic (if any) must be complied with.