Earnings Release • Nov 5, 2019
Earnings Release
Open in ViewerOpens in native device viewer




by Craig Jasienski


1) Total volume based on prorated volume (WW Ocean, EUKOR, ARC and Armacup)
2) H&H share calculated based on unprorated volumes. Nominal volume for auto and H&H calculated as total prorated volume x unprorated auto share and total prorated volume x unprorated H&H share, respectively
| iness update | |
|---|---|

Note: Prorated volumes on operational trade basis in CBM
1) Including Cape sailings (South Africa)
Net freight / CBM development
Net freight = Freight revenues adjusted for surcharge elements such as BAF, SRC, THC etc.

Q1'19 September
August
July
Q2'19
- flexibility to redeliver up to 12 vessels by end of 2020 (excl. vessels on short charter)

Q1'18
Q3'18 Q4'18
Q3'17 Q4'17 Q2'18
- significant volume remains to be renewed towards end of 2019
(Circle indicate size of contract in millions)

Rate impact (USD millions)
- remaining improvements expected to carry a longer lead time

longer lead-time
11
- well prepared for the transition, expected non-recoverable cost in Q4 about USD 10 million1
| Key risks | Mitigating actions | Updated risk assessment |
Previous risk assesment |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technical readiness |
Change over to new fuel |
Tried and tested method involving no off-hire period | Low | Low | |
| Quality of new fuel |
Test runs on different types of compliant fuel with good results |
Low | Low | ||
| Fuel availability |
Availability of compliant fuel |
Have entered contracts with major suppliers, back-up solution to run on MGO |
Low | Medium | |
| Financial and commercial impact |
Financial impact in Q4'19, Q1'202 |
Non-recoverable cost of sloshing tanks and running on new fuel before 1 Jan 2020 estimated to about USD 10m1 , financial hedges in place to manage pot. BAF lag impact |
High | High | |
| Updating BAFs3 | Good progress on customer discussions, targeting special reference period |
Low | Medium | ||
| Acceptance of scrubbers |
Hybrid scrubbers chosen | Low | Low |
1 Calculated based on a spread between VLSFO and HFO of approx. USD 185 and spread between MGO and HFO of approx. USD 240
2 Risk related to three factors: i) switching costs, ii) having to buy compliant fuel ahead of new regulation and new BAFs being applicable and 3) increased spread, i.e. higher MGO/VLSFO price outright and lag effect 3 Risk consists of three main parts: i) successfully negotiating change to new BAF, ii) uncertainty of reference period – should refer to a period when VLSFO has started trading, and iii) uncertainty wrt. reference price index – should be an index that is based on actual prices traded in the market

by Rebekka Herlofsen

- underlying performance improves as a result of efficiency improvements, despite lower revenues
| Q3 2019 | Q2 2019 | % change q-o-q |
Q3 2018 | % change y-o-y |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total income | 955 | 1 005 | (3%) | 1 031 | (7%) |
| Operating expenses | (741) | (794) | (7%) | (879) | (16%) |
| EBITDA* | 213 | 211 | 1% | 152 | 40% |
| EBIT | 94 | 88 | 6% | 56 | 69% |
| Financial income/(expenses) |
(72) | (83) | (13%) | (34) | 109% |
| Tax income/(expense) | 14 | (3) | n/a | (1) | n/a |
| Profit for the period | 36 | 3 | 1133% | 20 | 77% |
| EPS | 0.08 | (0.00) | n/a | 0.05 | 77% |
| *IFRS 16 effect on EBITDA | 41 | 42 | n/a | n/a | n/a |
- underlying performance improvement despite lower volumes

- underlying performance down as a result of lower volumes in both terminals and technical services


- second dividend payment of USD 6 cents per share

equivalent to USD
25 million
by Craig Jasienski

- deep sea volumes down 1.4% y-o-y

• Total light vehicle (LV) sales in the third quarter decreased 1.1% compared to the corresponding period last year and down 0.5% from the previous quarter as soft sales were seen among all major regions.

• Total exports in the third quarter were down 1.4% compared to the corresponding period last year, down 2.1% from the previous quarter.



• The implementation of the EU WLTP emission testing scheme contributed to several monthly effects as the market entered different standards both in September 2018 and September 2019.



• Chinese LV production capacity continues to be ramped up and export growth remains to all global markets despite U.S. tariff issues.
| -1.9% | -1.4% | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 074 |
1 073 |
1 072 |
1 101 |
1 091 |
1 067 |
1 022 |
1 086 |
1 071 |
| Q3 2017 | Q4 2017 | Q1 2018 | Q2 2018 | Q3 2018 | Q4 2018 | Q1 2019 | Q2 2019 | Q3 2019 |
| • Production shift from JP to NA and weak sales of selected model |
||||||||
| contributed to most of the decline. | ||||||||

- auto analysts remain positive about medium-term growth prospects


OEM SALES ESTIMATES3
EXPORT1 & SALES DATA2

25 Source: 1 IHS Markit | World (major exporters) construction & rolling mining equipment and agriculture equipment exports (Avg. equipment value >20 kUSD ) (Units last 3 months y-o-y) (Rolling average units last 12 months) 2Caterpillar | 3 month rolling retail sales (Units last 3 months y-o-y) 3Factset data and Analytics (04.11.19) | OEM Revenue Consensus Estimate (y-o-y). Construction: Volvo, Caterpillar, CNH, Komatsu, Hitachi, Terex. Mining: Sandvik, Caterpillar, Hitachi, Atlas Copco(<2018), Epiroc (≥2018). Agriculture: AGCO, CNH, Deere. Sales in construction/agriculture/mining equipment divisions only



by Craig Jasienski



Building tools?
Free accounts include 100 API calls/year for testing.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.