Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

VIKING MINES LIMITED Capital/Financing Update 2021

Feb 7, 2021

66007_rns_2021-02-07_f82f5f67-1e4c-42be-a22c-0e874c2235e5.pdf

Capital/Financing Update

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

ASX ANNOUNCEMENT

VIKING IDENTIFIES FURTHER UNMINED HIGH-GRADE DRILL INTERCEPTS IN FIRST HIT DRILLING DATABASE

  • Additional unmined drill intercepts identified following 3D modelling of the historical mine workings.

  • Highlight unmined high-grade gold intersections at First Hit include:

  • 1.5m at 31.48g/t Au for 47 gram-metres from 65.8m (FHU035).

  • 5.3m at 5.10g/t Au for 27 gram-metres from 62.6m (FHU050).

  • 4.5m at 6.69g/t Au for 30 gram-metres from 92.7m (FHU054).

  • 4.9m at 64.76g/t Au for 318 gram-metres from 62.1m (FHU045).[ 1]

  • 3.0m at 77.57g/t Au for 233 gram-metres from 224.0m (BFH030).[ 1]

  • 4.0m at 26.10g/t Au for 104 gram-metres from 58.0m (BFH005).[ 1]

  • 3.7m at 22.2g/t Au for 82 gram-metres from 64.3m (FHU058).[ 1]

  • Lode interpretation models demonstrate the potential for remaining unmined mineralisation at the historical First Hit underground (UG) mine.

  • Diamond Drill (DD) programme planning has progressed, and the rig is due onsite the week commencing 15[th] February 2021.

Viking’s CEO Julian Woodcock commented: “With the ongoing 3D review of the historical data collected from the First Hit mine, we have identified further high-grade drilling intercepts outside of the recorded mined areas. These results reaffirm the potential offered by this mineralised system and I am eagerly anticipating getting the drill programme underway and obtaining the first drill core from this high-grade gold project in more than 18 years.”

ANNOUNCEMENT DETAILS

Viking Mines Limited (ASX: VKA) (“Viking” or “the Company”) is pleased to announce that through the ongoing collation of data and digitising of historical mining records, further high-grade historical drilling intercepts have been identified, outside of the known limits of the historical mining area. In addition, several intercepts have been identified outside of the currently defined limits of mineralisation indicating that the fertile structures continue to the North and South.

DATA REVIEW

Lode Interpretation

All drilling and UG face sampling data are being assessed in 3D, to produce an updated interpretation of the mineralisation at First Hit. Through this assessment, Viking has determined 3 main gold bearing lodes that characterise the majority of the mineralisation.

1 Previously reported in VKA:ASX release dated 26th November 2020

ASX:VKA vikingmines.com

P +61 2 8072 1400 F +61 2 8072 1440

1

==> picture [593 x 81] intentionally omitted <==

  • Kylie Lode – Separately identified as the Evans and Kylie Lodes near surface and merge to form the Kylie lode at depth (Figure 1).

  • Owens Lode – Forms in the footwall (FW) to the Kylie Lode as a splay from the main structure (Figure 2). A ‘cross-lode’ connects the two at the 310 RL and has been mined in a different orientation indicating potential for other orientations of mineralisation.

  • Ida Splay (Lode) – Forms in the hanging wall (HW) to the Kylie lode as a splay from the main structure (Figure 3).

Plans of the 390, 310 and 230 levels are shown on the long sections to illustrate the lode positions and interactions relative to one another and what areas have been mined and the potential for remaining mineralisation.

Underground Mine Workings

An initial 3D model of the underground mine workings at First Hit has been compiled by CSA Global and the Company to assist with drill programme planning and to minimise the risk of drilling into mining voids. The model was created by reviewing and digitising all the available historical data obtained from old mine records and the publicly available First Hit Final Mine Report 2002 (issued by Barra Resources to the Department of Mines, Industry, Regulation and Safety - DMIRS). The extents of these workings have been plotted on long sections below for each of the lodes encountered at First Hit.

==> picture [531 x 362] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1: Kylie Lode intercepts outside of known mined extents.

ASX:VKA | vikingmines.com

2

==> picture [593 x 81] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [496 x 338] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

-
----- End of picture text -----

Figure 2: Owens Lode intercepts outside of known mined extents.

==> picture [498 x 340] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 3: Ida Lode intercepts outside of known mined extents.

ASX:VKA | vikingmines.com

3

==> picture [593 x 81] intentionally omitted <==

Drilling Data

All drilling data that pierces these lode models are plotted on the long sections as gram metre intervals. Overlaying the UG mined workings has identified areas at First Hit where mineralisation has not been mined. Values previously reported by the Company in ASX release dated 26[th] November 2020 are shown on the long sections alongside newly identified intercepts which are outside of limits of the known workings. Evidence of the structure continuing to the north and south is also present outside the mineralised position of the lodes and shown in the figures. All the intercepts reported are listed in Appendix 1.

NEXT STEPS

Ongoing geological review of the historical data is underway, with the objective of:

  • Refining the impending phase 1 DD programme.

  • Assessing the potential of the unmined portions of the First Hit mine.

  • Determining areas of mineralisation which are not closed off and lack sufficient drilling.

  • Identifying key geological structures which will influence controls to mineralisation.

  • Determining any association between rock type and alteration with mineralisation.

Additional data related to the historically mined workings has not yet been fully captured. Assessment and acquisition of these data is ongoing and will continue to inform the geological model. When combined with the results of the impending drill programme these data will help determine the best areas to focus future phases of drilling and predict the potential for additional mineralised shoots. Data currently being captured are:

  • Detailed geological information and assay data off face mapping sheets historically collected at ~3m intervals throughout the mine.

  • Underground survey data of ore mined in the backs (roof) of underground drives.

Viking is also in the process of trying to source additional key datasets and maps of the UG development which were completed by the mine geologists as the mine was developed. This information will further provide valuable insights to help gain a greater understanding of the mineralisation at First Hit and will assist in planning future exploration activity.

This announcement has been authorised for release by the Board of the Company.

==> picture [81 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

Julian Woodcock CEO

Viking Mines Limited

For further information, please contact: Viking Mines Limited Dean Jagger Company Secretary 02 8072 1447

ASX:VKA | vikingmines.com

4

==> picture [593 x 81] intentionally omitted <==

ABOUT VIKING MINES

Viking Mines is a gold focussed company with the First Hit Project located 150km NW of Kalgoorlie in Western Australia being the primary asset under exploration.

Viking have an aggressive exploration strategy to explore for high grade gold occurrences and discover ounces along fertile gold structures. The historically mined, First Hit gold mine is the focus of Vikings activity to deliver on this strategy. Rapid advancement and exploration is occurring to explore, discover and develop gold ounces at the Project. The strategy will generate shareholder value through the discovery of new gold resources.

First Hit Project, Western Australia

The First Hit Project is centred around the historic high-grade First Hit gold mine situated along the prospective Ida and Zuleika Shear zones in the Eastern Goldfields of Western Australia. The Project incorporates ~28km[2] of tenements with 6 active Mining and Prospecting licences and 1 Exploration licence under application. At the core of this landholding is a 6.4km[2] group of contiguous tenements which host the historic First Hit gold mine.

Prior to closure of the First Hit gold mine by Barra Resources in 2002 and at a time of depressed gold prices of US$ 320/oz, the First Hit mine produced ~30koz ounces of gold at an average grade of ~7.7g/t Au. No modern exploration activity has been conducted in the past 18 years and creates a significant opportunity for Viking. The Company is focused on delivering exploration programmes to test near mine extensions and regional targets around the First Hit Project with the objective of defining fertile structures and discovering gold ounces.

Examples of the high-grade nature of the mineralisation previously drilled at First Hit include:

  • 4.9m at 64.8g/t Au from 62.1m (FHU045)

  • 3m at 77.6g/t Au from 224.0m (BFH030)

  • 4m at 26.1g/t Au from 58.0m (BFH005)

The Project area is well serviced by infrastructure and is located 50km west of the sealed Goldfields highway and the township of Menzies. It is within 100km radius of 4 operating Gold Processing Plants, the nearest being the Davyhurst Mill 50km to the south, owned and operated by Ora Banda Mining (ASX:OBM). The nearest operating gold mine, owned by OBM is the Riverina open pit, located 8km south of the First Hit gold mine.

The Company also has projects located in Ghana and Mongolia. Viking is currently undergoing legal proceedings to secure an outstanding payment of US$ 5 million, associated with the sale of the Akoase project in Ghana.

Forward-Looking Statements

This document may include forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning Viking Mines Limited’s planned exploration program and other statements that are not historical facts. When used in this document, the words such as "could," "plan," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "may”, "potential," "should," and similar expressions are forward-looking statements. Although Viking Mines Limited believes that its expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, such statements involve risks and uncertainties and no assurance can be given that actual results will be consistent with these forward-looking statements.

ASX:VKA | vikingmines.com

5

==> picture [593 x 81] intentionally omitted <==

COMPETENT PERSONS STATEMENT

Information in this release that relates to Exploration Results on the Western Australian projects is based on information compiled by Mr Ian Stockton, who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (AusIMM). Mr Stockton is a full-time employee of CSA Global. Mt Stockton is engaged by Viking Mines Ltd as an independent consultant. Mr Stockton has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Stockton consents to the inclusion in the release of the matters based on his information in the form and the context in which it appears.

APPENDIX 1: SUMMARY OF DRILL HOLE INTERSECTIONS QUOTED IN TEXT

Hole ID East (m)
MGA94
North
(m)
MGA94
RL
(m)
End of
Hole
(m)
Azi
(°)
Dip
(°)
Depth
From
(m)
Downhole
Length (m)
Au
g/t
Lode
BFH098 265,539 6,714,989 445 32.0 290 -60 19 1.0 3.94 Kylie
BFH104 265,553 6,714,888 445 90.0 290 -60 51 3.0 1.25 Kylie
BFH104 - - - - - - 51 1.0 1.20
BFH104 - - - - - - 52 1.0 0.16
BFH104 - - - - - - 53 1.0 2.39
FHU035 265,535 6,714,828 266 79.4 136 -25 65.8 1.5 31.48 Kylie
FHU035 - - - - - - 65.8 0.8 54.70
FHU035 - - - - - - 66.6 0.7 1.83
FHU035 265,535 6,714,828 266 79.4 136 -25 73.0 1.30 29.58 Kylie
FHU035 - - - - - - 73.0 0.50 1.40
FHU035 - - - - - - 73.5 0.40 1.87
FHU035 - - - - - - 73.9 0.40 92.50
FHU050 265,620 6,714,741 263 74.3 286 -61 62.6 5.3 5.10 Kylie
FHU050 62.6 0.3 51.80
FHU050 - - - - - - 62.9 0.4 2.61
FHU050 - - - - - - 63.3 0.3 0.65
FHU050 - - - - - - 63.6 1.0 0.04
FHU050 - - - - - - 64.6 1.0 0.08
FHU050 - - - - - - 65.6 0.5 0.08
FHU050 - - - - - - 66.1 0.5 0.17
FHU050 - - - - - - 66.6 0.4 19.30
FHU050 - - - - - - 67.0 0.5 0.11
FHU050 - - - - - - 67.5 0.3 4.85
FHU057 265,620 6,714,741 263 97.7 231 -76 83.16 1.39 8.22 Kylie
FHU057 - - - - - - 83.16 0.89 11.56
FHU057 - - - - - - 84.1 0.50 2.27
FHU055 265,620 6,714,758 264 71.1 310 -58 64.5 1.80 7.56 Kylie
FHU055 - - - - - - 64.5 0.45 1.82
FHU055 - - - - - - 65.0 0.56 21.00
FHU055 - - - - - - 65.5 0.79 1.30
FHU042 265,535 6,714,830 265 76.3 85 -28 63.52 1.35 15.61 Kylie
FHU042 - - - - - - 63.52 0.73 26.40
FHU042 - - - - - - 64.3 0.62 2.90
BFH111 265,684 6,714,898 440 232.0 290 -60 211 1.0 2.94 Kylie

ASX:VKA | vikingmines.com

6

==> picture [593 x 81] intentionally omitted <==

Hole ID East (m)
MGA94
North
(m)
MGA94
RL
(m)
End of
Hole
(m)
Azi
(°)
Dip
(°)
Depth
From
(m)
Downhole
Length (m)
Au
g/t
Lode
BFH079 265,585 6,715,049 444 60.0 288 -58 46.0 3.0 1.39 Kylie
BFH079 - - - - - - 46.0 1.0 2.01
BFH079 - - - - - - 47.0 1.0 0.28
BFH079 - - - - - - 48.0 1.0 1.89
BFH015 265,640 6,714,883 442 190 290 -60 155 1.0 14.6 Kylie
FHU052 265,620 6,714,740 263 107.8 269 -86 84.20 6.60 1.94 Ida
FHU052 - - - - - - 84.20 0.30 1.90
FHU052 - - - - - - 84.50 0.50 7.19
FHU052 - - - - - - 85.00 0.50 0.64
FHU052 - - - - - - 85.50 0.57 0.08
FHU052 - - - - - - 86.07 0.68 0.01
FHU052 - - - - - - 86.75 0.45 0.03
FHU052 - - - - - - 87.20 0.37 0.02
FHU052 - - - - - - 87.57 0.43 0.01
FHU052 - - - - - - 88.00 1.00 2.16
FHU052 - - - - - - 89.00 0.98 2.73
FHU052 - - - - - - 90.0 0.82 4.15
FHU054 265,621 6,714,738 263 116.8 192 -82 92.7 4.5 6.69 Ida
FHU054 92.7 0.2 2.37
FHU054 - - - - - - 92.8 0.4 58.50
FHU054 - - - - - - 93.2 0.5 4.24
FHU054 - - - - - - 93.7 0.9 0.14
FHU054 - - - - - - 94.6 0.3 0.15
FHU054 - - - - - - 94.8 0.7 0.12
FHU054 - - - - - - 95.5 0.5 0.17
FHU054 - - - - - - 96.0 0.5 1.55
FHU054 - - - - - - 96.5 0.2 5.84
FHU054 - - - - - - 96.7 0.1 2.69
FHU054 - - - - - - 96.9 0.3 6.85
BFH135 265,691 6,714,757 438 279.0 290 -60 260 1.0 21.70 Ida
BFH053 265,531 6,714,871 447 80.0 290 -60 45 1.0 4.26 Owens
BFH127 265,545 6,714,889 446 83.0 290 -60 53 2.0 13.50 Owens
BFH127 - - - - - - 53 1.0 23.40
BFH127 - - - - - - 54 1.0 3.59
FHU035 265,535 6,714,828 266 79.4 136 -25 65.77 2.23 21.16 Owens
FHU035 - - - - - - 65.77 0.83 54.70
FHU035 - - - - - - 66.6 0.65 1.83
FHU035 - - - - - - 67.3 0.75 0.79
BFH038 265,726 6,714,764 437 308.0 290 -60 244 2.0 19.42 Owens
BFH038 - - - - - - 244 1.0 38.00
BFH038 - - - - - - 245 1.0 0.84

ASX:VKA | vikingmines.com

7

==> picture [593 x 81] intentionally omitted <==

APPENDIX 2: JORC TABLES

JORC Table 1

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Sampling
techniques
Nature and quality of sampling
(e.g. cut channels, random chips,
or specific specialised industry
standard measurement tools
appropriate to the minerals
under investigation, such as
downhole gamma sondes, or
handheld XRF instruments, etc.).
These examples should not be
taken as limiting the broad
meaning of sampling.
Surface Geochemistry
WMC mining completed several phases of soil geochemistry between 1990 and 1992 with
2,836 samples collected. This included:

Stream sediment geochemistry from active streams from contemporary lags within
stream beds.

2 kg pan concentrate samples collected from trap sites in active drainage
channels.

Soil samples collected from 5-15 cm depth or 15-30 cm depth depending on soil
thickness and passed through -10#, +36#, -80# or 120# meshes.
Surface soil sampling was sieved through a 6 mm mesh.
Barminco Pty Ltd undertook 2 geochemical soil geochemistry programs on the northern part
of M30/99 between 1995 and 2000. The first soil survey completed was designed to test
areas of residual soil and outcrop, whereas the second soil survey tested areas covered by
shallow transported cover. In areas of residual soil and outcrop –80 mesh soil samples were
collected on a 50 m x 50 m spaced grid and analysed for gold and arsenic. In areas of
transported cover, a preliminary 100 m x 400 m spaced auger soil sampling program was
undertaken.
The details of the sampling methods and horizons tested for the -80# mesh soil sampling
and auger sampling are not described.
WMC collected ironstone float rock chip samples (number unknown) across the tenements.
Barminco completed undertook rock chip sampling between 1996 and 2002, though the
number of samples collected is unknown. Rock chips are described as being collected also
taken in areas with cover, laterite development and recent drainage areas for pathfinder
and mapping purposes.
Surface Drilling
WMC completed 13 RC drill holes and one diamond drill hole during their tenure between
1990 and 1992. No descriptions of the nature of the sampling are available.
Barminco completed core and diamond drilling with percussion and core drilling of holes
up to 346 metres deep below surface has been undertaken over time over the First Hit
Project area mineralisation. And 21 RC holes north and south along strike from the deposit
testing for repeats of the First Hit mineralisation.
Percussion samples were split at the drill sites and a 2-5 kg sample was taken for
processing and analysis. Probable waste zones were sampled by compositing over 2-4
metres and individual samples were retested if the composites were anomalous.
Core from drilling was split length ways and half was used for initial analysis whilst the
remaining half was used for reference material (kept used for metallurgical testing as
required).
Underground Ore Control and Definition:
Underground resource definition drilling using drill core provided solid core samples for
analysis. During mining operations face channels and production drill holes were used to
assist with ore definition and control. Whole core was sampled from UG drill core.
Include reference to measures
taken to ensure sample
representivity and the
appropriate calibration of any
measurement tools or systems
used.
The entire RC sample was extracted prior to subsampling at surface next to the rig;
samples from diamond drilling were subsampled in a core handling facility. Diamond and
RC field duplicates were taken on selected intervals within the interpreted mineralised
horizons to measure representativity of sample splits.
Aspects of the determination of
mineralisation that are Material
to the Public Report. In cases
where ‘industry standard’ work
has been done this would be
relatively simple (e.g. ‘reverse
circulation drilling was used to
obtain 1 m samples from which
3 kg was pulverised to produce a
30 g charge for fire assay’). In
other cases more explanation
may be required, such as where
there is coarsegold that has
The breakdown in drilling method yielding each sample type is included in the table
below.
Sample preparation consisted of coarse crushing a maximum of 3 kg of the submitted
sample, pulverising to >85% passing 75 microns and homogenising the pulp for all sample
types.
50 g sample sizes were chosen for analysis of gold, with fire assay fusion and detection by
atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS).

ASX:VKA | vikingmines.com

8

==> picture [593 x 81] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
inherent sampling problems.
Unusual commodities or
mineralisation types (e.g.
submarine nodules) may warrant
disclosure of detailed
information
Drilling
techniques
Drill type (e.g. core, reverse
circulation, open-hole hammer,
rotary air blast, auger, Bangka,
sonic, etc.) and details (e.g. core
diameter, triple or standard tube,
depth of diamond tails, face-
sampling bit or other type,
whether core is oriented and if
so, by what method, etc.).
Drillhole data over the First Hit Project area comprised 295 holes, consisting of 187 RC, 3
surface diamond holes, 55 RAB holes, and 50 UG DDH holes, with an additional 504 UG
face channel samples (collected as horizontal channels across the ore drive headings).
RC samples were collected using a face-sampling, 4.5-inch diameter bit via the inner return
tube to a sample splitter.
Surface diamond core drilling utilised an NQ2 size (50.6 mm) drill bit. The core diameter
for underground drilling could not be obtained from available reports however from the
corephotos the core size appears to be NQ.
Total
-
holes &
(m)
% of total
holes &
(m)
% of total
holes &
(m)
% of total
holes &
(m)
% of total
holes &
(m)
% of total
-
187
23%
3
0%
55
7%
50
6%
504
63%
799
24,132
78%
545
2%
2,091
7%
2,190
7%
2,094
7%
31,052
UG_DDH
UG_CNHL
Underground Diamond
Core Drilling
Underground
Channel/Face Sampling
Reverse Circulation
RC
DDH
RAB
Surface Diamond Core
Drilling
Rotary Air Blast
Drill sample
recovery
Method of recording and
assessing core and chip sample
recoveries and results assessed.
No documentation regarding the measurement of drill core or RC recoveries could be found
in the various reports and tables in the available data. The following comment is extracted
from the 2001 First Hit Mine Ore Resource and Mining Report: “Sample recoveries
throughout the drilling programs has been excellent (majority greater than 80%) with no
major problems encountered”.
CSA Global briefly reviewed historical drill core stored on site (holes un-labelled) and core
photographs of underground drill holes (FHU001, FHU019, FHU041, FHU044, FHU045,
FHU046, FHU052, FHU055) and noted that core was in good condition with long intervals
of unbroken core and no evidence of poor recoveries.
CSA Global through examining core photos is satisfied that core recoveries were adequate
though better documentation by the original project owners in this regard would have
been more conclusive.
Measures taken to maximise
sample recovery and ensure
representative nature of the
samples.
Sampling techniques were chosen as appropriate for ground conditions to maximise
sample recovery. There is no additional record of measures in place to maximise recovery.
Whether a relationship exists
between sample recovery and
grade and whether sample bias
may have occurred due to
preferential loss/gain of
fine/coarse material.
Insufficient information on sample recovery is available to establish whether a relationship
between sample recovery and grade exists.
Logging Whether core and chip samples
have been geologically and
geotechnically logged to a level
of detail to support appropriate
Mineral Resource estimation,
mining studies and metallurgical
studies.
All RC and diamond drillholes were geologically logged to an industry standard
appropriate for the mineralisation present at the project.
All RC drill chip samples were geologically logged at 1 m intervals from surface to the end
of each drillhole.
Diamond core was photographed, and RC chips were retained in chip trays for future
reference.
Ausdrill completed three, NQ2 diamond drill holes at the First Hit deposit for geotechnical
assessment prior to mining. The holes were designed in consultation with Golder Associates
Pty Ltd and were targeted into the mineralised zones and continued on average 30 m into
the footwall to assess the likely ground conditions for the decline and ore accesses.
Approximately 70 metres of core was drilled for each hole allowing the hangingwall, the ore
zone and the footwall zone to be assessed. Golders Associates Pty Ltd were commissioned
to undertake the geotechnical assessment.
The Competent Person considers that the level of detail is sufficient for the reporting.
Whether logging is qualitative or
quantitative in nature. Core (or
costean, channel, etc.)
photography.
Lithological logging is qualitative in nature. Logged intervals were compared to the
quantitative geochemical analyses to validate the logging.
The Competent Person considers that the availability of qualitative and quantitative
logging has appropriately informed the geological modelling, including weathering and
oxidation, water table level and rock type.

ASX:VKA | vikingmines.com

9

==> picture [593 x 81] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
The total length and percentage
of the relevant intersections
logged.
The total length of all drilling was geologically logged.
Subsampling
techniques
and sample
preparation
If core, whether cut or sawn and
whether quarter, half or all core
taken.
Diamond core was cut into two halves using a diamond core saw for surface drilling. One
of the halves was placed into a numbered calico bag, which was tied and placed in a
plastic/poly-weave bags for assaying.
Underground DDH samples were whole core sampled.
If non-core, whether riffled, tube
sampled, rotary split, etc. and
whether sampled wet or dry.
RC samples were collected via a splitter to yield sub samples of approximately 3 kg from a
1 m downhole sample length. Expected waste zones were initially sampled as 2 m or 4 m
composites and later resampled at 1 m intervals if anomalous assay results were returned.
Re-samplingwas undertaken usingthe spear samplingmethod
For all sample types, the nature,
quality and appropriateness of
the sample preparation
technique.
The Competent Person considers these methods appropriate for this style of
mineralisation.
Quality control procedures
adopted for all subsampling
stages to maximise representivity
of samples.
CSA Global were unable to establish QAQC processes involving the use of CRM, including
blanks and standards.
The following is described from the First Hit Mine Ore Resources and Mining Report, 2001
and indicates duplicates were used to inform the resource model.
“Several samples were often submitted for each positive assay. These were taken on site and
submitted to the same laboratory under a different sample number and then assayed using
the same technique. An average of these results for each interval has been used within the
ore resource calculations”.
CSA Global does not consider the above process to be suitable as a form of QAQC. The
lack of CRMs is not industry practice. CSA Global recommends the application of industry
standard QAQC to all future drilling programs.
Measures taken to ensure that
the sampling is representative of
the in-situ material collected,
including for instance results for
field duplicate/second-half
_sampling. _
Barminco Pty Ltd
See comments above regarding the use of duplicates by Barminco. Several samples were
often submitted for each positive assay. These were taken on site and submitted to the
same laboratory under a different sample number and then assayed using the same
technique. An average of these results for each interval has been used within the ore
resource calculations.
Whether sample sizes are
appropriate to the grain size of
the material being sampled.
The First Hit Project mineralisation and targets within the associated tenements are
expected to be coarse grained and nuggety gold. Further exploration will need to
consider the grain size of gold and distribution of particles. No previous petrology reports
were found, and future work will include petrological studies in the early stage of
exploration.
Quality of
assay data
and
laboratory
tests
The nature, quality and
appropriateness of the assaying
and laboratory procedures used
and whether the technique is
consideredpartial or total.
7,865 samples were prepared for Fire Assay and tested by Kalgoorlie Assay Laboratory.
There are incomplete records for the remaining 2,150 samples. Fire Assay is considered a
total digest and whilst generally appropriate for the type of mineralisation, cyanide bottle
roll leach test work may be recommended for exploration should coarse gold be
encountered in future exploration.
For geophysical tools,
spectrometers, handheld XRF
instruments, etc., the parameters
used in determining the analysis
including instrument make and
model, reading times,
calibrations factors applied and
their derivation, etc.
No non-destructive tools or devices are recorded as being used.
Nature of quality control
procedures adopted (e.g.
standards, blanks, duplicates,
external laboratory checks) and
whether acceptable levels of
accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and
precision have been established.
CSA Global has not been able to obtain the original assay certificates for exploration and
resource drilling on the First Hit Project tenements.
As recorded in the QC procedure section duplicates were used as a way of informing the
resource model. For future exploration it is recommended that standard CRMS, blanks
and duplicates be used for QAQC.
Verification
of sampling
and assaying
The verification of significant
intersections by either
independent or alternative
company personnel.
Due to the samples being sampled and collected 20 years ago, independent verification is
difficult and has not been undertaken. CSA Global recommend unpacking the remaining
drill core on site and reviewing the geology, alteration, structure and mineralisation.
The use of twinned holes. No twin drilling has been undertaken; however, significant reported underground
development and sampling has verified the information provided by the surface drilling.
Some twinning of drill holes for exploration purposes is recommended by CSA Global.

ASX:VKA | vikingmines.com

10

==> picture [593 x 81] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Documentation of primary data,
data entry procedures, data
verification, data storage
(physical and electronic)
protocols.
The data entry, storage and documentation of primary data was completed in Microsoft
Access databases and assembled by CSA Global into a central database for future
purposes. The majority of the data reviewed by CSA Global has been summarised from
primary sources.
Discuss any adjustment to assay
data.
No adjustments or calibrations have been made to any assay data.
Location of
data points
Accuracy and quality of surveys
used to locate drillholes (collar
and downhole surveys),
trenches, mine workings and
other locations used in Mineral
Resource estimation.
All drill hole collars were surveyed by differential global positioning system (DGPS) or by
the mine operations survey equipment. The following extract from the 2001 First Hit Mine
Ore Resource and Mining report states the following:
Down hole surveying of drill holes was undertaken on the majority of holes whilst being
drilled. This has enabled only dip readings to be collected as the instrument was used within
the drill string. Several programs of downhole surveying using a single shot Eastman camera
have been completed for all available holes in the First Hit area and have been incorporated
into the database.
Where downhole surveys were unavailable due to the collapse of the hole, survey estimates
at regular intervals have been applied. These are based on the deviation of the surrounding
drill holes. Drill holes greater than 100 m in depth deviated consistently in the azimuth to the
southwest (against rotation). The dip angle in most cases steepened and in some of the
deeper holes this was quite dramatic. Drill string stabilizers were tried at various times in an
attempt to helpalleviate thisproblem, but no consistent results were achieved.
Specification of the grid system
used.
Topographic data for the mine drilling were captured in MGA Zone 51 grid. A local grid has
been established at First Hit, which is orthogonal to the known mineralised trend of the area
(020 degrees). The grid orientation is at 290 degrees magnetic which is optimal for this
deposit. The conversion from local to AMG 84 grid is presented in the table below.
Quality and adequacy of
topographic control.
Historical survey work for the First Hit Mine was conducted via differential global
positioning system (DGPS) and is appropriate as an industry standard method.
A topographic surface used for coding the block model was built from a system using a
detailed drone survey. The Competent Person considers that the surface is suitable for
future exploration activities.
Data spacing
and
distribution
Data spacing for reporting of
Exploration Results.
The majority of the data on the tenements is surface geochemistry which are adequate for
defining anomalies for future exploration.
Whether the data spacing and
distribution is sufficient to
establish the degree of
geological and grade continuity
appropriate for the Mineral
Resource and Ore Reserve
estimation procedure(s) and
classifications applied.
Existing drilling on the periphery of historically mined areas is suitable for defining
additional drill targets laterally, down dip and in the near surface environment.
Whether sample compositing
has been applied.
Sample composting was applied in initial exploration drilling at the First Hit Project and
always followed upbydetailed samplingat 1 m interval, or less for core drilling.
Orientation
of data in
relation to
geological
structure
Whether the orientation of
sampling achieves unbiased
sampling of possible structures
and the extent to which this is
known, considering the deposit
type.
The regular spaced drilling on consistent sections, and the orientations orthogonal to the
strike of the lodes, has provided consistent support to intersections of mineralisation to
eliminate any bias or influence of hole angles on grades.
If the relationship between the
drilling orientation and the
orientation of key mineralised
structures is considered to have
introduced a sampling bias, this
should be assessed and
reported if material.
No relationship has been noted between drillhole orientation and mineralisation.

ASX:VKA | vikingmines.com

11

==> picture [593 x 81] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Sample
security
The measures taken to ensure
sample security.
The competent person is unaware of measures taken to ensure sample security during past
exploration. Chain of custody procedures are recommended for future exploration.
Audits or
reviews
The results of any audits or
reviews of sampling techniques
and data.
No external audit of sampling techniques and data could be sourced from the documents
provided to CSA Global.
JORC 2012 Table 1 Section 2 – Reporting of Exploration Results
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Mineral
tenement
and land
tenure status
Type, reference name/number,
location and ownership including
agreements or material issues
with third parties such as joint
ventures, partnerships,
overriding royalties, native title
interests, historical sites,
wilderness or national park and
environmental settings.
Tenements and location
The First Hit Project tenements are located approximately 50 km due west of the town of
Menzies, Western Australia on the Menzies (05) 1:250,000 and Riverina 3038 1:100,000
topographic mapsheets,and include:
Tenement
Status
Holder
M30/0099
Live
Red Dirt MiningPtyLtd
M30/0091
Live
Red Dirt MiningPtyLtd
P30/1125
Live
Red Dirt MiningPtyLtd
P30/1137
Live
Red Dirt MiningPtyLtd
P30/1144
Live
Red Dirt MiningPtyLtd
E30/529
Under application
VikingMines Ltd
P30/1126
Live – undergoingtransfer to Viking
Australia Menzies Emeralds PtyLtd
Third Party Interests
The nickel rights to M30/99 & M30/91 are held by Riverina Resources Limited and Barra
Resources Limited.
P30/1126 is subject to a 1% Net Smelter Royalty with Australia Emerald Menzies Pty Ltd on
any gold produced from the tenement.
Red Dirt Mining are not aware of any material 3rd party interests or royalties.
Native Title, Historical sites and Wilderness
Archaeological and ethnographic studies were undertaken for M30/99 prior to further
development in 2001. These studies involved an examination of the existing ethnographic
data base pertaining to the mining area and an examination of known ethnographic site
distribution. The studies concluded that it was unlikely that the developments will impact any
sites of Aboriginal significance. This information was submitted to the Department of
Aboriginal Affairs.
A recent search of the Department of Aboriginal Affairs (DAA) Heritage Inquiry System
indicates there are no registered Aboriginal Heritage Sites identified within any tenement
covered under this MCP (DAA 2019).
The mininglease wasgrantedprior to the Native Title Act beingenforced.
The security of the tenure held at
the time of reporting along with
any known impediments to
obtaining a licence to operate in
the area.
The tenements are held in good standing by Red Dirt Mining Pty Ltd.
Exploration
done by
other parties
Acknowledgment and appraisal
of exploration by other parties.
The Red Dirt tenements have been actively explored and mined since 1886 with the arrival
of prospecting parties during the initial Western Australia gold rush. Arthur and Tom Evans
founded the First Hit gold mine in 1938.
Tom and Arthur worked the mine until Tom sold his share to Riverina station owner Bill
Skathorpe in late 1953. Arthur and Bill worked the mine until Bill's death in 1954. George
Vujcich Senior bought the mine from Arthur and Bill's estate in late 1955. George and then
his son George operated the mine intermittently over a 40-year period. Barminco purchased
the First Hit tenement from George's daughter in late 1996.
Regional exploration activities were undertaken by Western Mining Corporation (WMC) and
Consolidated Gold Operations prior to 1996 including geochemical sampling, lag sampling
and auger programs. The programs covered the various regolith features with a purpose of
defining broad geochemical anomalies.
From 1996 to 2002 exploration and development was undertaken by Barra Resource or
Barminco.
Barminco Pty Ltd undertook geochemical soil geochemistry on the northern part of M30/99
between 1995 and 2000. Various combinations of multielement geochemistry were
completed historically, rangingfromgold-onlyassays to 42 elementgeochemistry.

ASX:VKA | vikingmines.com

12

==> picture [593 x 81] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
The following extract from the Barra Resources mine closure and production report provides
an insight to the exploration and discovery of the First Hit deposit:
“Barminco Pty Ltd acquired the First Hit tenement in August 1996, with the objective of
exploring for and developing moderate sized high grade gold deposits. Because of
Barminco’s mining and exploration activities at Two Boys, Karonie, Jenny Wren, Gordon Sirdar
and Bacchus Gift mines the period between August 1996 and June 2000 saw only intermittent
work at First Hit. Twenty RC drill holes were completed demonstrating the potential for high-
grade underground resources.
The First Hit deposit was effectively discovered in June 2000 with drill hole BFH 025 which
returned 3 zones of mineralisation including 5m @ 60 g/t, 7m @ 9.0 g/t and 2m @ 3.7 g/t”.
Barra Resources subsequently completed a 20 m x 25 m drill out to 240 m in depth,
combined with a detailed feasibility study, culminating in the commencement of mining
operations in August 2001.
Barra Resources also completed RC drill programs at three prospects within the First Hit
Project leases, referred to as First Hit North, First Hit South and Clarkes Well. Minor gold
mineralisation was intersected in a small number of holes, but no further exploration was
completed.
The leases have since been owned by several companies and private operators without
much additional exploration.
Geology Deposit type, geological setting
and style of mineralisation
Regional Geology
The area of interest lies on the 1:100,000 Riverina geological sheet 3038 (Wyche, 1999). The
Mt Ida greenstone belt is a north-striking belt of predominantly metamorphosed (upper
greenschist-amphibolite facies) mafic and ultramafic rocks that form the western boundary
of the Eastern Goldfields geological terrane. The major structure in this belt is the Mt Ida
Fault, a deep mantle tapping crustal suture that trends N-S and dips to the east. It marks the
western boundary of the Kalgoorlie Terrane (~2.7 Ga) of the Eastern Goldfields Province
against the Barlee Terrane (~3.0 Ga) of the Southern Cross Province to the west. To the east
the belt is bounded by the Ballard Fault, a continuation of the strike extensive Zuleika Shear.
The Mt Ida belt is widely mineralised, predominantly with discordant vein gold deposits.
Associated element anomalism typically includes copper and arsenic but neither have been
identified in economic concentrations. There is some nickel sulphide mineralisation
associated with the komatiite component of the supracrustal rocks and the area includes a
locally significant beryl deposit sporadically mined for emeralds. In the Riverina area the
outcrop position of the Ida Fault is equivocal, and it is best regarded as a corridor of related
structures with an axis central to the belt.
The Riverina and First Hit Project area dominantly comprises metabasalts and metadolerites
of tholeiitic parentage with lesser metagabbros and komatiites. Small post-tectonic
granitoids intrude the sequence with locally higher-grade metamorphic conditions.
Structurally, the dominant features are north-striking, east-dipping reverse faults and
associated anastomosing strain zones. A conjugate set of late brittle structures striking NE
and NW is also evident.
The mineralisation exploited to date has typically been narrow mesothermal anastomosing
veins. These frequently have strike and dip dimensions able to sustain small high-grade
mining operations.
Local Geology
The local geology of the First Hit Project area comprises north-striking ultramafics, komatiites
and peridotites with some sediments in the eastern part of the block. To the west there is a
metabasalt unit including a prominent gabbro and further west again more peridotite with
amphibolite. The general strike trend drifts to the north-northwest then back to north. The
sequence includes a small felsic intrusive west of the Emerald workings and a zone of felsic
schists within the eastern ultramafics. Felsic intrusives occur in the northwest corner. The
local strike fabric trends north then north-northeast.
The First Hit mineralisation occurs as a quartz lode varying to 4 m in thickness dipping at 70º
to the east. The lode is hosted in biotite-carbonate schist within metabasalt and plunges to
the south at around 50º. Numerous shafts, prospecting pits and costeans exist on the
tenements and recorded production for the First Hit and First Hit North areas in the period
1930-1974 was ~7478 oz Au from 6091 tonnes mined. The First Hit North workings are 130
m further to the north-northeast.
References
Wyche, S.1(1995). Geology of the Mulline and Riverina 1:100,000 Sheets. Geological Survey
of Western Australia
Grey, A.R (2002) Annual Technical Reporting, 1 July 2000 to 30 June 2001, E30/193, M30/99,
M30/118, P30/869, P30/894, Riverina 1:100,000 Sheet 3038 Barra Resources Limited

ASX:VKA | vikingmines.com

13

==> picture [593 x 81] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Drill hole
Information
A summary of all information
material to the understanding of
the exploration results including
a tabulation of the following
information for all Material drill
holes:

easting and northing of
the drill hole collar

elevation or RL
(Reduced Level –
elevation above sea
level in metres) of the
drill hole collar

dip and azimuth of the
hole

down hole length and
interception depth

hole length.
If the exclusion of this
information is justified on the
basis that the information is not
Material and this exclusion does
not detract from the
understanding of the report, the
Competent Person should clearly
explain why this is the case.
A summary of the relevant drillhole information has been included in Appendix 1 in this
report.
Data
aggregation
methods
In reporting Exploration Results,
weighting averaging techniques,
maximum and/or minimum
grade truncations (eg cutting of
high grades) and cut-off grades
are usually Material and should
be stated.
Where aggregate intercepts
incorporate short lengths of high
grade results and longer lengths
of low grade results, the
procedure used for such
aggregation should be stated
and some typical examples of
such aggregations should be
shown in detail.
The assumptions used for any
reporting of metal equivalent
values should be clearly stated.
All drilling exploration assay results are reported as weighted averages.
Relationship
between
mineralisation
widths and
intercept
lengths

These relationships are
particularly important in the
reporting of Exploration Results.

If the geometry of the
mineralisation with respect to the
drill hole angle is known, its
nature should be reported.

If it is not known and
only the down hole lengths are
reported, there should be a clear
statement to this effect (eg ‘down
hole length, true width not
_known’). _
The drilling programs at the First Hit deposit reported herein are variably oblique to the true
width of the deposit.
All drill holes are reported as down hole widths as the true width cannot be determined.
Diagrams Appropriate maps and sections
(with scales) and tabulations of
intercepts should be included for
any significant discovery being
reported These should include,
but not be limited to a plan view
All appropriate maps and plans are included in the body of the report.

ASX:VKA | vikingmines.com

14

==> picture [593 x 81] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
of drill hole collar locations and
appropriate sectional views
Balanced
reporting
Where comprehensive reporting
of all Exploration Results is not
practicable, representative
reporting of both low and high
grades and/or widths should be
practiced to avoid misleading
reporting of Exploration Results.
The assay intervals reported in Appendix 1 contain both the high grade and low-grade assay
intervals.
Other
substantive
exploration
data
Other exploration data, if
meaningful and material, should
be reported including (but not
limited to): geological
observations; geophysical survey
results; geochemical survey
results; bulk samples – size and
method of treatment;
metallurgical test results; bulk
density, groundwater,
geotechnical and rock
characteristics; potential
deleterious or contaminating
substances
All information considered by the competent person to be of a material nature has been
included in the body of the report.
Further work The nature and scale of planned
further work (eg tests for lateral
extensions or depth extensions
or large-scale step-out drilling).
Diagrams clearly highlighting the
areas of possible extensions,
including the main geological
interpretations and future drilling
areas, provided this information
is not commercially sensitive.
Exploration programs are currently being designed to test the up dip, lateral and down dip
extensions of the mineralisation at the First Hit deposit. Regional multielement geochemical
programs are being designed to supplement the existing geochemistry, however, advances
in geochemical analysis mean that that lower level detection limits can be obtained for more
elements than in previous geochemical surveys.
Previous geophysical data is being obtained with a view to reprocessing the data.

ASX:VKA | vikingmines.com

15