Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

VERITY RESOURCES LIMITED Capital/Financing Update 2017

Sep 17, 2017

66020_rns_2017-09-17_9203d255-3e63-4db4-bd3c-66e0c42ec397.pdf

Capital/Financing Update

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

ASX ANNOUNCEMENT

18 SEPTEMBER 2017

==> picture [159 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

ASX:BML

ABN: 96 122 995 073

Issued Capital: 1,824,315,814 ordinary shares

SIGNIFICANT COPPER VISIBLE FROM INITIAL HOLES AT DIBETE - PROGRAM PROGRESS UPDATE

The Board of Botswana Metals Limited is pleased to provide a progress update on the 1500m Reverse Circulation (RC) drill program targeting highgrade copper and silver mineralisation at the Dibete and Airstrip Copper projects in North-eastern Botswana ( see ASX announcement 4 September 2017 ).

Directors:

Mr Patrick Volpe (Chairman) Mr Steve Groves (Director/Geologist) Mr Josh Letcher (Non-executive) Mr Ed Bulseco (Non-executive)

Registered Office:

Suite 506, Level 5 1 Princess Street, Kew Victoria, Australia, 3101

Contact:

p: +61 (3) 9855 1885 e: [email protected]

About Botswana Metals

The drill rig has been operating for the past week and has completed over 450m across 8 of the planned 22-hole program. Most of the holes have intersected significant widths of visible supergene copper mineralisation at shallow depths.

HIGHLIGHTS

  • Hole DBRC123: 17m of strong malachite-azurite mineralisation from 15m.

  • Hole DBRC124: 23m of strong malachite-azurite mineralisation from 24m.

  • Hole DBRC126: 5m of strong malachite mineralisation from 22m.

  • Hole DBRC128: 6m of strong malachite mineralisation from 24m.

Botswana Metals is exploring for nickel, copper, cobalt, tantalum and lithium within its ~1,500 square kilometre exploration portfolio. These “new world” metals are becoming increasingly important as the world switches to cleaner sources of energy.

The company announced a maiden JORC Inferred Resource of 2.38Mt on 28[th] April 2015 from drilling within a small 185 square kilometre section of its exploration portfolio in which it had entered a joint venture with BCL. At the time cobalt was not included in the resource calculation.

Historical drilling outside of the joint venture ground has intercepted further nickel as well as significant intercepts of copper and cobalt.

A soil sampling program detected traces of lithium and tantalum which warrant further exploration.

Large tracts of BML’s exploration portfolio remain unexplored.

  • Hole DBRC129: 12m of strong malachite-azurite-chalcocite mineralisation from 37m.

  • Hole DBRC130: 13m of strong malachite-azurite-chalcocite mineralisation from 41m.

Samples from the first week of drilling are currently being sent to an independent laboratory in South Africa for analysis. Results will be released to the market as soon as they are received.

DRILL PROGRAM

The 1500m RC drilling program has been designed to test new mineralisation models at both the Dibete and Airstrip Copper – Silver projects. Approximately 1000m at Dibete and 500m at Airstrip will be completed. The program will comprise twin, scissor and close-spaced infill drilling to replicate a number previous intersections and to test gaps and extensions to the current mineralisation models.

The new information generated by the drilling will provide a framework for further geological interpretation that will guide future regional and deeper exploration programs.

==> picture [15 x 9] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

7 7
----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [513 x 138] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [513 x 137] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1: Location of the Airstrip and Dibete Prospects (highlighted in red) within BML's Magogophate exploration portfolio in North-eastern Botswana 8 OF 22 PLANNED HOLES DRILLED.

==> picture [529 x 278] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

DBRC124
DBRC123
DBRC129
DBRC127
DBRC130
(Lost sample return– to be re drilled)
DBRC128
DBRC126
DBRC125
----- End of picture text -----

Figure 2: Plan view of the Dibete Project showing modelled mineralisation shells (pink), previous drill holes (thin grey traces) and proposed holes (thicker black traces). Holes completed to date are indicated by red text and arrows.

The Board will keep the market informed of the progress of the drill program including all assay results as they come to hand.

Patrick Volpe Chairman

PROPOSED DRILL COLLARS

Table 1: Dibete Drill Collars

==> picture [525 x 659] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

HoleID Depth EAST NORTH RL AZI DIP Zone Comment
Follow up high grades in 081,
DBRC123 50 638225 7593866 0 225 -60 6100N
082, 079
scissor 014 into high grade
DBRC124 70 638179 7593903 0 137 -60 6100N
zone
Test mineralisation down-dip
DBRC125 70 638228 7593758 0 45 -60 6100N
of 108
Test mineralisation model
DBRC126 50 638227 7593797 0 45 -60 6100N
close to 030
Test mineralisation in 098 up
DBRC127 50 638228 7593835 0 45 -60 6100N
dip
Test mineralisation in 098
DBRC128 60 638214 7593821 0 45 -60 6100N
down dip
Test mineralisation in 014,
DBRC129 50 638190 7593868 0 45 -60 6100N
028 up dip
Test mineralisation in 014,
Hole 8 90 638173 7593853 0 45 -60 6100N
028 down dip
Test mineralisation down dip
Hole 9 70 638156 7593895 0 45 -60 6100N
of 100, 006
Hole 10 60 638153 7593915 0 45 -60 6100N Test drilling gap in model
Test mineralisation between
Hole 11 40 638148 7593943 0 45 -60 6100N
026 and 104
Test NW extension of
Hole 12 40 638135 7593956 0 45 -60 6100N
mineralisation
Test NW extension of
Hole 13 60 638124 7593945 0 45 -60 6100N
mineralisation
Test min model at 114 and
Hole 14 50 638492 7594006 0 225 -60 6400N
004 up dip
Test min model at 114 and
Hole 15 70 638510 7594023 0 225 -60 6400N
004 down dip
Test mineralisation model at
Hole 16 50 638482 7594031 0 225 -60 6400N
046
Test mineralisation model at
Hole 17 50 638533 7593926 0 225 -60 6400N
005
Hole 18 40 638517 7593948 0 225 -60 6400N Test drilling gap in model
TOTAL 1020
HoleID Depth EAST NORTH RL AZI DIP Conductor Comment
Test down dip min on shoot
Hole1 90 631436 7595300 0 325 -60 C2
model beneath 130 and 019
Test down dip min on shoot
Hole2 175 631713 7595044 0 325 -60 C6
model beneath 071
Test down dip min on shoot
Hole3 110 631903 7594812 0 325 -60 C12
model beneath 067
Test down dip min on shoot
Hole4 120 631885 7594792 0 325 -60 C12
model beneath 098
TOTAL 495
----- End of picture text -----

Table 2: Airstrip Drill Collars

Competent Person

The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results is based on, and fairly represents, information and supporting documentation compiled by BML staff on site and provided to Mr Steve Groves who is a Member of The Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Mr Groves is Director of, and a consulting geologist to BML and has previously been employed as the Exploration Manager at BML. Mr Groves has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves”. Mr Groves consents to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

APPENDIX 1 – JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

CRITERIA JORC Code Explanation Commentary
Sampling
techniques
- Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut
channels, random chips, or specific
specialised industry standard measurement
tools appropriate to the minerals under
investigation, such as down hole gamma
sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc).
These examples should not be taken as
limiting the broad meaning of sampling.
- Include reference to measures taken to
ensure sample representivity and the
appropriate calibration of any measurement
tools or systems used.
- Aspects of the determination of
mineralisation that are Material to the Public
Report.
- In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has
been done this would be relatively simple
(eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to
obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was
pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire
assay’). In other cases, more explanation
may be required, such as where there is
coarse gold that has inherent sampling
problems. Unusual commodities or
mineralisation types (eg submarine
n o d u l e s ) may warrant disclosure of
detailed information.
For Reverse Circulation holes,
samples are collected for every m
drilled via a riffle splitter attached
to the cyclone. Samples are
labeled and set aside to await
determination for assay after
onsite handheld XRF analysis is
undertaken
Where appropriate, drill core is
arranged neatly in 1m core trays
for HQ (typically weathered rocks
above the limit of oxidation) and
1.5m core trays for NQ core from
competent rock. Core is marked at
every metre along an orientation
line.
Samples for independent
laboratory analysis are collected at
appropriate geological and or
mineralization boundaries and are
generally 1m or less in width.
Spot analysis using an XRF analyser
is been undertaken at every 10cm
interval
across
the
mineralised
intervals for core, and at several sites
per sample bag for RC at t h e BML
site office in Tshokwe using a portable
XRF
analyzer
(INNOV-X
Delta
Premium). Industry standards and
blanks are used
to monitor the
calibration of the instrument.
This information is used as a guide to
the potential mineralised intervals
and primarily used to determine
appropriate sampling intervals for
independent Laboratory analysis
Drilling
techniques
- Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-
hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger,
Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core
diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of
diamond tails, face sampling bit or other
type, whether core is oriented and if so, by
what method, etc).
The holes referred to in this
release have been drilled by
Reverse Circulation or HQ
Diamond core through the
weathered rock and NQ Diamond
Core through unweathered rock
and the mineralized zones.
All core drilling is standard tube
method.
All competent core from the
current program is oriented using
a spear orientation method.
Historic holes have been either NQ
core, HQ core or Reverse
CRITERIA JORC Code Explanation Commentary
Circulation percussion methods.
Drill
sample
recovery
- Method of recording and assessing
core and chip sample recoveries and
results assessed.
- Measures taken to maximise sample
recovery and ensure representative
nature of the samples.
- Whether a relationship exists between
sample recovery and grade and
whether sample bias may have
occurred due to preferential loss/gain
of fine/coarse material.
For RC, sample recovery is
estimated based on the amount of
material returned for each m within
the sample bag. If recovery is lost
or inadequate, the hole will be
redrilled to achieve the target
The core is measured after every
run, and the results are compared
to the actual run to calculate core
recoveries. Core is handled with
care to avoid breakage and
crumbling. Core is washed and laid
onto holding core trays.
HQ core is used on friable ground,
rotation speeds and water
pressure are monitored to avoid
destroying the core. A soft rubber
mallet is used to drive out core
from the barrel.
No significant core loss or
recovery issues have been
recorded in the current drill
program.
Logging - Whether core and chip samples have been
geologically and geotechnically logged to a
level of detail to support appropriate
Mineral Resource estimation, mining
studies and metallurgical studies.
- Whether logging is qualitative or
quantitative in nature. Core (or
costean, channel, etc) photography.
- The total length and percentage of
the relevant intersections logged.
A sub-sample from each RC m is
collected and logged both dry and
wet as the hole is being drilled.
This sub-sample is then stored in
appropriated m marked chip trays
and stored onsite for future
reference.
All core will be photographed with
beginning, ending and
intermediate intervals clearly
marked on each box. Core will be
photographed prior to sampling or
any other procedures that may
disturb the initial orientation of the
core.
The core or chips will be logged in
appropriate detail including
identification of lithology,
structure, alteration, mineralization
and other notable characteristics.
Percentages of core recovery and
Rock Quality Descriptor (RQD) will
be included in the log. The core
recovery will be calculated based
on each drill run (interval). The
RQD calculation will be based on
the total length of core sections
recovered that are greater than 2.0
times the core diameter for each
drill run or interval.

==> picture [447 x 741] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

CRITERIA JORC Code Explanation Commentary
Sub- - If core, whether cut or sawn and  All RC samples are riffle-split and
sampling whether quarter, half or all core taken. sampled dry.
techniques - If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled,  Core is cut along the marked
and sample rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet orientation line, half core is
preparation or dry. sampled for metallurgical test work.
-
For all sample types, the nature, quality The remaining half core is cut for
and appropriateness of the sample quarter core for lab assaying and
preparation technique. storage.
-
Quality control procedures adopted for  No field duplicates were taken.
all sub-sampling stages to maximise  For lab dispatch, blanks and
representivity of samples. certified reference material are
- Measures taken to ensure that the
inserted at every 5 [th] sample for
sampling is representative of the in-situ
QAQC.
material collected, including for instance
results for field duplicate/second-half
sampling.
-
Whether sample sizes are appropriate
to the grain size of the material being
sampled.
Quality of - The nature, quality and appropriateness SGS South Africa
assay data of the assaying and laboratory  For all samples the analytical
and procedures used and whether the techniques use a four acid digest
laboratory technique is considered partial or total. multi element suite with ICP/OES or
tests - For geophysical tools, spectrometers, ICP/MS finish (25 gram or 50 gram
handheld XRF instruments, etc, the FA/AAS for precious metals). The
parameters used in determining the acids used are hydrofluoric, nitric,
analysis including instrument make and perchloric and hydrochloric acids,
model, reading times, calibrations suitable for silica based samples.
factors applied and their derivation, etc. The method approaches total
-
Nature of quality control procedures dissolution of most minerals. Total
adopted (eg standards, blanks, sulphur is assayed by combustion
duplicates, external laboratory checks) furnace.
and whether acceptable levels of  Platinum group elements and gold
accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision
are assayed by Fire Assay following
have been established.
either Pb or NiS collection followed
by ICP-MS finish.

Verification - The verification of significant  The data were examined by the
of intersections by either independent or senior personnel on site.
sampling alternative company personnel.  The primary data were audited and
and - The use of twinned holes. verified and then stored in a SQL
assaying - Documentation of primary data, data entry relational data base.
procedures, data verification, data storage  No data have been adjusted.
(physical and electronic) protocols.
-
Discuss any adjustment to assay data.
Location - Accuracy and quality of surveys used to  The data were recorded in
of data locate drill holes (collar and down-hole longitude/latitude WGS84.
points surveys), trenches, mine workings and  The terrain is largely flat.
other locations used in Mineral  Down hole surveys are carried out
Resource estimation.
- on all holes at 4m intervals using a
Specification of the grid system used.
- Flexit survey tool.
Quality and adequacy of  N/A – All historic drillholes have
topographic control.
been surveyed using DGPS with an
accuracy of <1m.
Data spacing - Data spacing for reporting of  The drilling referred to was
and Exploration Results. designed to confirm previous drill
distribution - Whether the data spacing and distribution results, infill and step out from
is sufficient to establish the degree of previous holes to the tenor and
geological and grade continuity appropriate extent of mineralization.
for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve  The drill hole spacing is deemed
estimation procedure(s) and classifications appropriate for achieving the
applied. objectives of the program.
-
Whether sample compositing has
been applied.
----- End of picture text -----

CRITERIA JORC Code Explanation Commentary
Orientation
of
data in
relation
to
geological
structure
- Whether the orientation of sampling
achieves unbiased sampling of
possible structures and the extent to
which this is known, considering the
deposit type.
- If the relationship between the drilling
orientation and the orientation of key
mineralised structures is considered to
have introduced a sampling bias, this
should be assessed and reported if
material.
The drill lines are oriented at
approximately 90 degrees to the
strike of both local and regional
geological trend.
Drill holes are at 55 degree or 60
angle and orientation of holes does
address the orientation of
structures.
Sample
security
- The measures taken to ensure sample
security.
Samples were taken and
transported by BML personnel to
the BML site office Prior to XRF
analyses the samples are locked in
the BML office.
Audits or
reviews
- The results of any audits or reviews of
sampling techniques and data.
The data were examined by the
independent consultant Mr Steve
Groves of Sydney in Australia and
considered appropriate.

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

CRITERIA JORC Code Explanation Commentary
Mineral
tenement and
land
tenure
status
- Type, reference name/number, location
and ownership including agreements or
material issues with third parties such as
joint ventures, partnerships, overriding
royalties, native title interests, historical
sites, wilderness or national park and
environmental settings.
- The security of the tenure held at the
time of reporting along with any known
impediments to obtaining a licence to
operate in the area.
The results reported in this
announcement are from activity in
PL 110/94 and PL 111/94 which are
granted Exploration Licences held
by African Metals Limited, a 100%
owned subsidiary of Botswana
Metals Limited.
PL 110/94 and PL 111/94 were
subject to a Joint Venture
agreement with BCL Limited who
are currently in provisional
liquidation
PL 110/94 and PL 111/94 are both
good standing.
Exploration
done by other
parties
- Acknowledgment and appraisal of
exploration by other parties.
Interpretations and conclusions in
this announcement refer in part to
results generated by historic
exploration work conducted by
Roan Selection Trust, Falconbridge,
Cardia Mining and Botswana Metals.
Botswana Metals considers all
previous exploration work to have
been undertaken to an appropriate
professional standard.
CRITERIA JORC Code Explanation Commentary
Geology - Deposit type, geological setting and
style of mineralisation.
The Dibete and Airstrip projects are
hosted within the Magogaphate
Shear Zone - a major geological
structural
feature,
generally
considered to mark the boundary
between the Archaean aged (>2.5
billion
year
old)
Zimbabwean
Craton and the Limpopo Belt or
Limpopo Mobile Zone (LMZ). The
nickel-copper deposits of Selebi
Phikwe lie within the northern part
of the Central Zone of the Limpopo
Mobile Belt, whilst the nickel copper
deposits of Phoenix, Selkirk and
Tekwane lie in the Zimbabwean
Craton. The Central Zone of the LMZ
comprises
variably
deformed
banded
gneisses
and
granitic
gneisses,
infolded
amphibolites
and ultramafic intrusions that that
have the potential to host Ni-Cu
sulphide mineralization. Ni-Cu-PGE
mineralization at Maibele North and
Airstrip
copper
is
spatially
associated
with
an
ultramafic
intrusion.
Drill
hole
Information
- A summary of all information material to
the understanding of the exploration
results including a tabulation of the
following information for all material drill
holes:
o easting and northing of the drill
hole collar
o elevation or RL (Reduced Level –
elevation above sea level in
metres) of the drill hole collar
o dip and azimuth of the hole
o down hole length and interception
depth
o hole length.
- If the exclusion of this information is
justified on the basis that the information
is not Material and this exclusion does
not detract from the understanding of
the report, the Competent Person
should clearly explain why this is the
case.
All drilling in this release has
previously been released publicly
with all relevant drill hole
information already in the public
domain.
Data
aggregation
methods
- In reporting Exploration Results,
weighting averaging techniques,
maximum and/or minimum grade
truncations (eg cutting of high grades)
and cut-off grades are usually Material
and should be stated.
- Where aggregate intercepts
incorporate short lengths of high
grade results and longer lengths of
low grade results, the procedure used
for such aggregation should be stated
and some typical examples of such
aggregations should be shown in
detail.
- The assumptions used for any
reporting of metal equivalent values
should be clearly stated.
Where uneven sampling intervals
have contributed to an averaged
result, the result has been
calculated by a weighted average
technique that incorporates the
interval width of each contributing
sample.
A grade cut-off of 0.3%Ni or Cu and
internal dilution of <2m has been
used in the calculation of
significant intercepts.
For the >900ppm Co intervals, a
grade cut-off of 900ppm Co and
internal dilution of <2m has been
used in the calculation of
significant Cobalt intercepts.
No grade truncations have been
applied to the data.

==> picture [446 x 564] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

CRITERIA JORC Code Explanation Commentary
Relationship - These relationships are particularly  The precise geometry of the
between important in the reporting of mineralization with respect to
mineralisation Exploration Results. the drill hole angle is not
widths and - If the geometry of the mineralisation known and thus, all drill hole
intercept with respect to the drill hole angle is results are reported as down
lengths known, its nature should be reported. hole length.
-
If it is not known and only the down  The drill holes in the current
hole lengths are reported, there should
program are inclined
be a clear statement to this effect (eg reconnaissance holes based on the
‘down hole length, true width not
average dip of exposed units. The
known’). orientation of the mineralization is
unknown and true width is
unknown.
 Geotechnical logging is under way
to address the geometry of
mineralisation.
Diagrams - Appropriate maps and sections (with  Plan view and/or cross section maps
scales) and tabulations of intercepts of the reported drill holes are
should be included for any significant included in this announcement.
discovery being reported These should
include, but not be limited to a plan view of
drill hole collar locations and appropriate
sectional views.
Balanced - Where comprehensive reporting of all  N/A
reporting Exploration Results is not practicable,
representative reporting of both low and
high grades and/or widths should be
practiced to avoid misleading reporting of
Exploration Results.
Other - Other exploration data, if meaningful and  There is no other material
substantive material, should be reported including
exploration data that have not been
exploration (but not limited to): geological
data observations; geophysical survey results; previously reported.
geochemical survey results; bulk samples
– size and method of treatment;
metallurgical test
results; bulk density, groundwater,
geotechnical and rock characteristics;
potential deleterious or contaminating
substances.
Further work - The nature and scale of planned  The Maibele North project is
further work (eg tests for lateral currently the subject of mining
extensions or depth extensions or feasibility studies. If a potentially
large-scale step-out drilling). economic resource is defined,
-
Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas and can be mined profitably,
of possible extensions, including the then the necessary infill and
main geological interpretations and step-out drilling with be
future drilling areas, provided this undertaken to progress towards
information is not commercially a reserve calculation.
sensitive.
----- End of picture text -----