AI assistant
UNITY METALS LIMITED — Capital/Financing Update 2026
Apr 12, 2026
65980_rns_2026-04-12_921a048d-e40e-4d75-88fc-22dd6485f7c4.pdf
Capital/Financing Update
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
ASX Announcement 13 April 2026
==> picture [188 x 63] intentionally omitted <==
Geophysical Surveys Commence Ahead of Drilling at the O’Phlay Gold Project in Cambodia
Highlights
-
Austhai Geophysical Consultants (Thailand) Co., Ltd ( Austhai ) has commenced a series of remote sensing and geophysical surveys, including LiDAR, UAV Magnetics and GAIP, at the O’Phlay Gold Project ( O’Phlay ) in Cambodia. These are the first geophysical surveys ever to be conducted at O’Phlay.
-
O’Phlay is located 63km ENE of Unity’s flagship Ngot Gold Project and Emerald’s Okvau Gold Mine and Unity’s exploration at O’Phlay to date has identified similar intrusion-related gold (IRG) mineralisation.
-
Planned remote sensing and geophysical surveys at O’Phlay to include:
-
5.9 km[2] of LiDAR topographic surveying to an accuracy of sub-5 cm.
-
143 line km of UAV Magnetics , line spacing 50m, nominal height of 30 m
-
60.1 line km of Gradient Array Induced Polarization (GAIP) survey.
-
The surveys will take approximately 1 month to complete.
-
In preparation for the commencement of field work at O’Phlay, Unity is currently upgrading approximately 20 km of the main access road and it has also established a field camp.
-
It is expected the surveys will assist in Unity’s future drill targeting at O’Phlay, with drilling scheduled to commence in the current Quarter .
==> picture [246 x 280] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 1: Austhai Geophysical Consultants mobilising to O’Phlay
Australia Level 2, 34 Colin Street | West Perth WA 6005 | AUSTRALIA Cambodia 4A Street 36R | Khan Russey Keo | Phnom Penh 120703 | CAMBODIA W: www.unitymetals.com.au
==> picture [91 x 31] intentionally omitted <==
Craig Mackay, Unity’s Founder and Managing Director, said :
“Our targeting of drill holes to test the known gold prospects at O’Phlay should be significantly improved with the LiDAR, high resolution airborne magnetics and Gradient Array IP surveys. It is expected these remote sensing and geophysical methods combined with our existing geological mapping and surface geochemistry will enable us to efficiently test the known areas of gold mineralisation associated with broad zones of quartz-sulphide vein stockworks and narrower sulphiderich veins and give us a good chance of finding new zones of mineralisation that are not evident on the surface. We aim to commence drilling at O’Phlay in the current Quarter, as exploration at the Ngot Project continues.”
Unity Metals Limited (“ Unity ” or “ the Company ”) is pleased to announce that Austhai Geophysical Consultants (Thailand) Co., Ltd ( Austhai ) has commenced a series of remote sensing and geophysical surveys at the O’Phlay Gold Project ( O’Phlay ) in Eastern Cambodia.
The geophysical surveys will encompass the Camp and Small Creek Prospects that were subject to historical open-pit gold mining and where Unity has outlined sizable gold-in-soil anomalies, with results up to 3,540 ppb gold (Figures 2 & 3).
==> picture [331 x 379] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 2: Interpreted geology at O’Phlay showing the location of the main granodiorite intrusion, the Camp and Small Creek prospects and the area of the proposed geophysical surveys within the red outline.
2
==> picture [91 x 31] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [408 x 337] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
2.84g/t gold
0.31g/t gold 5.5m @ 2.1g/t gold
3.33g/t gold
----- End of picture text -----
Figure 3: Gold-in-soil anomalies at O’Phlay showing the location of the main granodiorite intrusion, the Camp and Small Creek prospects and the area of the proposed geophysical surveys within the red outline.
==> picture [488 x 226] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 4: Intense stockwork quartz – arsenopyrite vein mineralisation hosted in granodiorite. The mineralisation lies in the wall of a historical open-pit at the Camp Prospect. A composite channel rock chip result of 5.5 m @ 2.1 g/t gold was previously collected vertically by Unity on the exposed pit wall and is comprised of the following individual channel rock chip assay results all located at 762782 m East, 1416144 m North: sample (ID O2303021) with 2 m @ 2.84 g/t gold (upper); sample (ID O2303022) with 2 m @ 0.31 g/t gold (middle); and sample (ID O2303023) with 1.5 m @ 3.33 g/t gold (lower) (refer to Unity’s Independent Geologist’s Report - January 2026 for sampling details).
3
==> picture [91 x 31] intentionally omitted <==
LiDAR Surveying
LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) is an active remote sensing technology that uses pulsed laser light to measure distances and create precise, three-dimensional maps of the Earth’s surface and structures. By measuring the time it takes for light to reflect off surfaces and return to a sensor, it creates detailed "point clouds" used in topography mapping.
The survey will cover 5.9 km[2] and will be acquired using a Zenmuse L1 (Figure 5). This unit integrates a Livox LiDAR module, a high-accuracy IMU, and a camera with a 1-inch CMOS on a 3-axis stabilized gimbal.
It will produce a 3D terrain model down to an accuracy of less than 5cm. Unity expects the LiDAR to map the extensive historical mine workings at O’Phlay.
==> picture [290 x 281] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 5: O'Phlay UAV LiDAR and Magnetics coverage.
UAV Magnetics
UAV magnetics uses drones equipped with magnetometers to conduct high-resolution, low-altitude airborne geophysical surveys, offering a faster and safer alternative to ground or manned aircraft surveying. These systems detect subtle anomalies in the Earth's magnetic field to identify mineral deposits, geological structures, and underground objects
The survey will consist of 143 line-km of survey with line spacing of 50 m and tie line spacing of 250 m. The Nominal Height will be 30 m (Figure 5).
Austhai is deploying a Geometrics MagArrow drone deployable Magnetometer to O’Phlay. The MagArrow is made of an aerodynamic, light-weight carbon fiber shell. Internally the system contains an MFAM miniature magnetometer, GPS, IMU sensors, an SD card, and battery connectors. The MFAM
4
==> picture [91 x 31] intentionally omitted <==
sensors in the MagArrow are capable of highly precise measurements in an extremely lightweight and tiny package.
The MagArrow can be attached easily to a wide variety of enterprise drones. The 1000 Hz sample rate synchronized to the on-board GPS allows the system to function independently of the drone and the drone software. With such a fast sample rate, surveys can be completed at speeds up to 10 m/s with samples collected every 1 cm.
Gradient Array Induced Polarisation (GAIP) Surveying
Gradient Array Induced Polarisation is a high-speed, cost-effective geophysical mapping technique using two widely spaced, fixed current electrodes and smaller, mobile potential electrodes to measure chargeability and resistivity, primarily for mapping near-surface strike continuity and identifying disseminated sulphide mineralisation.
The Gradient Array Induced Polarisation survey will acquire 60.1 line-km with 2 overlapping arrays (Figure 6). The Transmitter unit Austhai employs is GDD’s model Tx4 and 5000W-2400V-20A Resistivity/Induced Polarisation (IP) GDD Receivers.
==> picture [367 x 393] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 6: O'Phlay Gradient Array Induced Polarisation Survey Plan south the layout of the Northern Grid and the Southern Grid.
==> picture [91 x 31] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [325 x 265] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 7: Gold Metals Group’s ore treatment plant in 2024 at the Camp Prospect. The plant was closed down in approximately 2020 by the Cambodian Government and now lies in ruin.
==> picture [493 x 278] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 8: The location of Unity’s O’Phlay project.
This announcement is authorised for release by the Managing Director of Unity Metals Limited
6
==> picture [91 x 31] intentionally omitted <==
For further information on the Company’s activities please contact:
Craig Mackay
T: 0418 397 091
For Investor Relations queries: For Media queries: Ben Henri Christina Granger E: [email protected] E: [email protected]
Follow us on:
==> picture [13 x 13] intentionally omitted <==
https://x.com/UnityMetalsLtd
==> picture [13 x 13] intentionally omitted <==
https://www.linkedin.com/company/unity-metals-ltd
7
==> picture [91 x 31] intentionally omitted <==
About Unity Metals Ltd
Unity Metals Limited, an ASX-listed company, is a SE Asia focused gold and copper explorer. It has established a large (~700km[2] ) and highly prospective portfolio of gold and copper-gold Projects in Cambodia and Thailand. These Projects are prospective for intrusion-related gold and porphyry copper gold deposits. Its assets in Cambodia are located in close proximity to 2 operating gold mines, including the Okvau Mine, the largest gold mine in Cambodia. Okvau is a 1.3Moz deposit and shares a licence boundary with Unity’s Ngot Gold Project. Unity’s assets in Thailand are more copper focused and consist of licence applications in the Loei Fold Belt, one of the major copper-gold belts in mainland South East Asia.
Qualifying Statements
Competent Persons statement
The information in this report that relates to exploration results is based on information compiled by Shane Hibbird, a Competent Person, who is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Hibbird is the Exploration Manager of the Company and has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Hibbird consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.
Forward-looking statements
This announcement may contain forward-looking statements, opinions and estimates. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees or predictions of future performance, and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are beyond the Company's control, and which may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the statements contained in this document and the attached materials. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on information available to the Company as of the date of this announcement. Except as required by law or regulation the Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements.
Previously reported exploration results
The information in this announcement relating to exploration results for the Company’s projects is extracted from the Company’s Prospectus dated 6 November 2025 and Revised Independent Geologist’s Report dated 2 January 2026 released to ASX on 8 January 2026, copies of which are available on the Company’s website at www.unitymetals.com.au/ news-release and on the ASX market announcements platform at www.asx.com.au/markets/trade-our-cash-market/ historical-announcements using the code “UM1”. In relation to the exploration results referred to in these releases, the Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original market announcement.
Proximate resources statements
This announcement contains references to other parties’ resources at projects either nearby or proximate to Company’s projects and/or references that may have topographical or geological similarities to the Company’s projects. It is important to note that such exploration results, discoveries or geological similarities do not in any way guarantee that the Company will have any exploration success at all, or in delineating a mineral resource on any of the Company’s projects.
8
==> picture [91 x 31] intentionally omitted <==
Appendix 1: JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Tables
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sampling | • Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut | Not Relevant, no drilling or sampling results are | |
| techniques | channels, random chips, or specific | being reported here. | |
| specialised industry standard | |||
| measurement tools appropriate to the | |||
| minerals under investigation, such as | |||
| down hole gamma sondes, or | |||
| handheld XRF instruments, etc). These | |||
| examples should not be taken as | |||
| limiting the broad meaning of | |||
| sampling. | |||
| • Include reference to measures taken to | |||
| ensure sample representivity and the | |||
| appropriate calibration of any | |||
| measurement tools or systems used. | |||
| • Aspects of the determination of | |||
| mineralisation that are Material to the | |||
| Public Report. | |||
| • In cases where ‘industry standard’ | |||
| work has been done this would be | |||
| relatively simple (eg ‘reverse | |||
| circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 | |||
| m samples from which 3 kg was | |||
| pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for | |||
| fire assay’). In other cases more | |||
| explanation may be required, such as | |||
| where there is coarse gold that has | |||
| inherent sampling problems. Unusual | |||
| commodities or mineralisation types | |||
| (eg submarine nodules) may warrant | |||
| disclosure of detailed information. | |||
| Drilling | • Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, | • Not Relevant, no drilling or sampling results are | |
| techniques | open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, | being reported here. | |
| auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details | |||
| (eg core diameter, triple or standard | |||
| tube, depth of diamond tails, face- | |||
| sampling bit or other type, whether | |||
| core is oriented and if so, by what | |||
| _method, etc). _ | |||
| Drill sample | • Method of recording and assessing | • Not Relevant, no drilling or sampling results are | |
| recovery | core and chip sample recoveries and | being reported here. | |
| results assessed. | |||
| • Measures taken to maximise sample | |||
| recovery and ensure representative | |||
| nature of the samples. | |||
| • Whether a relationship exists between | |||
| sample recovery and grade and | |||
| whether sample bias may have |
9
==> picture [91 x 31] intentionally omitted <==
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| occurred due to preferential loss/gain | ||
| of fine/coarse material. | ||
| Logging | • Whether core and chip samples have | • Not Relevant, no drilling or sampling results are |
| been geologically and geotechnically | being reported here. | |
| logged to a level of detail to support | ||
| appropriate Mineral Resource | ||
| estimation, mining studies and | ||
| metallurgical studies. | ||
| • Whether logging is qualitative or | ||
| quantitative in nature. Core (or | ||
| costean, channel, etc) photography. | ||
| • The total length and percentage of the | ||
| relevant intersections logged. | ||
| Sub-sampling | • If core, whether cut or sawn and | • Not Relevant, no drilling or sampling results are |
| techniques and | whether quarter, half or all core taken. |
being reported here. |
| sample | • If non-core, whether riffled, tube | |
| preparation | sampled, rotary split, etc and whether | |
| sampled wet or dry. | ||
| • For all sample types, the nature, | ||
| quality and appropriateness of the | ||
| sample preparation technique. | ||
| • Quality control procedures adopted for | ||
| all sub-sampling stages to maximise | ||
| representivity of samples. | ||
| • Measures taken to ensure that the | ||
| sampling is representative of the in situ | ||
| material collected, including for | ||
| instance results for field | ||
| duplicate/second-half sampling. | ||
| • Whether sample sizes are appropriate | ||
| to the grain size of the material being | ||
| sampled. | ||
| Quality of | • The nature, quality and | • Not Relevant, no drilling or sampling results are |
| assay data and | appropriateness of the assaying and |
being reported here. |
| laboratory | laboratory procedures used and | |
| tests | whether the technique is considered | |
| partial or total. | ||
| • For geophysical tools, spectrometers, | ||
| handheld XRF instruments, etc, the | ||
| parameters used in determining the | ||
| analysis including instrument make | ||
| and model, reading times, calibrations | ||
| factors applied and their derivation, | ||
| etc. | ||
| • Nature of quality control procedures | ||
| adopted (eg standards, blanks, | ||
| duplicates, external laboratory checks) | ||
| and whether acceptable levels of | ||
| accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision | ||
| have been established. |
10
==> picture [91 x 31] intentionally omitted <==
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Verification of | • The verification of significant | • Not Relevant, no drilling or sampling results are |
| sampling and | intersections by either independent or | being reported here. |
| assaying | alternative company personnel. | |
| • The use of twinned holes. | ||
| • Documentation of primary data, data | ||
| entry procedures, data verification, | ||
| data storage (physical and electronic) | ||
| protocols. | ||
| • Discuss any adjustment to assay data. | ||
| Location of | • Accuracy and quality of surveys used to | • Location data will be collected in WGS 84, UTM |
| data points | locate drill holes (collar and down-hole | zone 48N. |
| surveys), trenches, mine workings and | ||
| other locations used in Mineral | ||
| Resource estimation. | ||
| • Specification of the grid system used. | ||
| • Quality and adequacy of topographic | ||
| control. | ||
| Data spacing | • Data spacing for reporting of | • Not Relevant, no drilling or sampling results are |
| and | Exploration Results. | being reported here. |
| distribution | • Whether the data spacing and | |
| distribution is sufficient to establish the | ||
| degree of geological and grade | ||
| continuity appropriate for the Mineral | ||
| Resource and Ore Reserve estimation | ||
| procedure(s) and classifications | ||
| applied. | ||
| • Whether sample compositing has been | ||
| applied. | ||
| Orientation of | • Whether the orientation of sampling | • Not Relevant, no drilling or sampling results are |
| data in relation | achieves unbiased sampling of possible |
being reported here. |
| to geological | structures and the extent to which this | |
| structure | is known, considering the deposit type. | |
| • If the relationship between the drilling | ||
| orientation and the orientation of key | ||
| mineralised structures is considered to | ||
| have introduced a sampling bias, this | ||
| should be assessed and reported if | ||
| material. | ||
| Sample | • The measures taken to ensure sample | • Not Relevant, no drilling or sampling results are |
| security | security. | being reported here. |
| Audits or | • The results of any audits or reviews of | • There has been no external audit or review of the |
| reviews | sampling techniques and data. | Company’s techniques or data. |
11
==> picture [91 x 31] intentionally omitted <==
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Mineral | • Type, reference name/number, | • Unity’s Cambodian exploration licences include |
| tenement and | location and ownership including | Ngot and O’Phlay (both granted) and Ta Vaeng |
| land tenure | agreements or material issues with | (under application). Unity has an 85% interest in |
| status | third parties such as joint ventures, | each of the licences. |
| partnerships, overriding royalties, | • The licences are in good standing. The licences lie | |
| native title interests, historical sites, | wholly or partially in Ministry of Environment | |
| wilderness or national park and | “protected areas” which include flora and/or fauna | |
| environmental settings. | reserves & parks. | |
| • The security of the tenure held at the | • Exploration and mining is permitted within these | |
| time of reporting along with any | protected areas subject to government approval. | |
| known impediments to obtaining a | Exploration in the Unity licences was approved by | |
| licence to operate in the area. | the Ministry of Mines and Ministry of Environment | |
| following the completion of an Interim | ||
| Environmental & Social Impact Assessment (IESIA). | ||
| Government approval for mining is subject to the | ||
| submission of an acceptable Definitive Feasibility | ||
| Study and Final Environmental & Social Impact | ||
| Assessment (FESIA). Emerald Resources NL’s Okvau | ||
| Gold Mine was approved in a protected area. A | ||
| portion of the protected area was excised for the | ||
| mining licence. | ||
| Exploration | • Acknowledgment and appraisal of | • Unity’s Cambodian licences have seen very limited |
| done by other | exploration by other parties. | previous mineral exploration. |
| parties | ||
| Geology | • Deposit type, geological setting and | • The licence is prospective for intrusion-related gold |
| style of mineralisation. | (“IRG”) mineralisation. Unity’s O’Phlay licence lies | |
| 63km east-northeast of the Okvau Gold Mine | ||
| operated by Emerald Resources NL (ASX:EMR). | ||
| Drill hole | • A summary of all information material | • Not Relevant, no drilling or sampling results are |
| Information | to the understanding of the | being reported here. |
| exploration results including a | ||
| tabulation of the following information | ||
| for all Material drill holes: | ||
o easting and northing of the drill |
||
| hole collar | ||
o elevation or RL (Reduced Level – |
||
| elevation above sea level in metres) | ||
| of the drill hole collar | ||
o dip and azimuth of the hole |
||
o down hole length and interception |
||
| depth | ||
o hole length. |
||
| • If the exclusion of this information is | ||
| justified on the basis that the | ||
| information is not Material and this | ||
| exclusion does not detract from the | ||
| understanding of the report, the | ||
| Competent Person should clearly | ||
| explain why this is the case. |
12
==> picture [91 x 31] intentionally omitted <==
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data | • In reporting Exploration Results, | • | Not Relevant, no drilling or sampling results are | |
| aggregation | weighting averaging techniques, | being reported here. | ||
| methods | maximum and/or minimum grade | |||
| truncations (eg cutting of high grades) | ||||
| and cut-off grades are usually Material | ||||
| and should be stated. | ||||
| • Where aggregate intercepts | ||||
| incorporate short lengths of high grade | ||||
| results and longer lengths of low grade | ||||
| results, the procedure used for such | ||||
| aggregation should be stated and | ||||
| some typical examples of such | ||||
| aggregations should be shown in | ||||
| detail. | ||||
| • The assumptions used for any | ||||
| reporting of metal equivalent values | ||||
| should be clearly stated. | ||||
| Relationship | • These relationships are particularly | Not Relevant, no drilling or sampling results are | ||
| between | important in the reporting of | being reported here. | ||
| mineralisation | Exploration Results. | |||
| widths and | • If the geometry of the mineralisation | |||
| intercept | with respect to the drill hole angle is | |||
| lengths | known, its nature should be reported. | |||
| • If it is not known and only the down | ||||
| hole lengths are reported, there should | ||||
| be a clear statement to this effect (eg | ||||
| ‘down hole length, true width not | ||||
| _known’). _ | ||||
| Diagrams | • Appropriate maps and sections (with | • | Appropriate maps and sections are included in the | |
| scales) and tabulations of intercepts | body | of this release. | ||
| should be included for any significant | ||||
| discovery being reported These should | ||||
| include, but not be limited to a plan | ||||
| view of drill hole collar locations and | ||||
| appropriate sectional views. | ||||
| Balanced | • Where comprehensive reporting of all | • | Not Relevant, no drilling or sampling results are | |
| reporting | Exploration Results is not practicable, | being reported here. | ||
| representative reporting of both low | ||||
| and high grades and/or widths should | ||||
| be practiced to avoid misleading | ||||
| reporting of Exploration Results. | ||||
| Other | • Other exploration data, if meaningful | • | Austhai Geophysical Consultants (Thailand) Co., | |
| substantive | and material, should be reported | Ltd. | Mobilised to O’Phlay on the 11thof April 2026 | |
| exploration | including (but not limited to): | and | commenced acquisition of: | |
| data | geological observations; geophysical | o |
A Gradient Array Induced Polarization (GAIP) | |
| survey results; geochemical survey | survey | |||
| results; bulk samples – size and | o |
UAV LiDAR Survey | ||
| method of treatment; metallurgical | o |
UAV Magnetics Survey | ||
| test results; bulk density, groundwater, | • |
Maps showing the survey areas are in the main | ||
| geotechnical and rock characteristics; | body of this report. | |||
| potential deleterious or contaminating | • | The | Gradient Array Induced Polarisation survey will | |
| substances. | acquire 60.1 line-km with 2 overlapping arrays. The | |||
| Transmitter unit Austhai employs is GDD’s model |
13
==> picture [91 x 31] intentionally omitted <==
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tx4 | and 5000W-2400V-20A Resistivity/Induced | |||
| Polarisation (IP) GDD Receivers. | ||||
| • | The | UAV LiDAR and Magnetic Surveys will be | ||
| utilizing a DJI Matrice 300 RTK drone. The survey | ||||
| will cover 5.9 km2. | ||||
| • | LiDAR will be acquired using a Zenmuse L1. This | |||
| unit | integrates a Livox LiDAR module, a high- | |||
| accuracy IMU, and a camera with a 1-inch CMOS | ||||
| on a | 3-axis stabilized gimbal. It will produce a 3D | |||
| terrain model down to an accuracy of less than | ||||
| 5cm. | ||||
| • | Austhai is deploying a Geometrics MagArrow | |||
| drone deployable Magnetometer to O’Phlay. The | ||||
| MagArrow is made of an aerodynamic, light- | ||||
| weight carbon fiber shell. | ||||
| • | The magnetic survey will consist of 143 line-km of | |||
| survey with line spacing of 50 m and tie line spacing | ||||
| of 250 m. The Nominal Height will be 30 m. | ||||
| • | Magnetometer specifications are provided below: | |||
o |
Operating Principle:Laser pumped cesium | |||
| vapor (Cs133 non-radioactive) total field | ||||
| scalar magnetometer. | ||||
o |
Operating Range:20,000 to 100,000 nT. | |||
o |
Gradient Tolerance:10,000nT/m. | |||
o |
Operating Zones:Configured for operation | |||
| anywhere in the world without dead zones. | ||||
o |
Dead Zone:None. | |||
o |
Noise/Sensitivity:0.005nT/ Hzrms typical; | |||
| (SX (export) version: <0.02 nT/ Hzrms) | ||||
o |
Sample Rate:1000 Hz. synchronized to GPS | |||
| 1PPS. | ||||
o |
Bandwidth:400Hz. | |||
o |
Heading Error:± 5 nT over entire 360° | |||
| equatorial and polar spins typical. | ||||
o |
Output:WiFi data download over 2.4GHz | |||
| WiFi access point. | ||||
o |
GPS:Commercial grade with typical 1 m | |||
| accuracy. | ||||
o |
USB Port:Port for USB flash drive. Used for | |||
| field upgrades. | ||||
o |
Data Logger:Built in Data Logger. | |||
o |
Data Storage:32 Gbyte Micro SD card, U3 | |||
| speed class. Not field-accessible. Contact | ||||
| sales for higher capacities. | ||||
o |
Data Download:Over WiFi 2.4GHz using | |||
| user-supplied browser-capable device. 10 | ||||
| minutes of data requires 1 minute to | ||||
| download. | ||||
o |
IMU:Bosch BMI160 Accel/Gyro - 200 Hz | |||
| sample rate. Insentek Compass - 100 Hz | ||||
| Sample rate. | ||||
o |
Total Weight:1 kg without batteries. | |||
o |
Length:1 m. |
14
==> picture [91 x 31] intentionally omitted <==
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Further work | • The nature and scale of planned | • Refer to main body of this report. |
| further work (eg tests for lateral | ||
| extensions or depth extensions or | ||
| large-scale step-out drilling). | ||
| • Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas | ||
| of possible extensions, including the | ||
| main geological interpretations and | ||
| future drilling areas, provided this | ||
| information is not commercially | ||
| sensitive. |
15