AI assistant
UNION STAR METALS LTD — Capital/Financing Update 2021
Jun 23, 2021
65987_rns_2021-06-23_e65cb66d-44db-47cc-ae44-3864ced40839.pdf
Capital/Financing Update
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
ASX ANNOUNCEMENT
24 June 2021
==> picture [66 x 32] intentionally omitted <==
Leonora – Jungle Well High grade Gold in RC drilling
Highlights
-
Jungle Well resource infill drilling intersects shallow high-grade gold immediately north of the Jungle Well open pit:
-
9m @ 3.87g/t Au from 46m,
- including 2m @ 16.13g/t Au from 46m
-
Positive results from fresh rock beneath the existing Jungle Well open pit include:
-
7m @ 1.85g/t Au from 99m.
-
Assay results have been received for 12 holes with a further 21 holes pending .
-
Jungle Well North ground geophysics, MLEM survey scheduled for commencement in July, targeting extensions of existing conductors into E37/909.
==> picture [455 x 339] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 1: Jungle Well open pit showing latest drilling and significant results (see Table 1 and 2 for drill hole collar data and all significant results from most recent drilling)
==> picture [240 x 54] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [66 x 32] intentionally omitted <==
PVW Resources Limited (PVW or the Company) is very pleased to announce the results from the RC drill program completed in April at Jungle Well with further results pending from 21 holes.
Positive results have been received from the first 12 drill holes with high grade assays returned from shallow oxide mineralisation. The highlight intersection of 9m @ 3.87g/t from 45m (including 2m @ 16.13 g/t Au) is from oxide material located 50m north of the Jungle Well open pit. The area immediately north of the existing open pit was not adequately tested due to a 2-3m high waste stockpile which prevented drill rig access. Drill lines over the stockpile allowed RC rig access. Assay results for 12 holes have been returned from the program total of 33 holes (21JWRC024 – 21JWRC056), with results for the remaining 21 holes still pending.
Following receipt of all assays, data analysis and required interpretation, the company will provide a revised Mineral Resource Estimation for the Jungle Well project in Q4, 2021.
Executive Director Mr. Bauk commented, “These initial results from our RC drill program at Jungle Well provide us with enthusiasm that we can build on the existing JORC resource. The best intersection of 9m @ 3.87g/t is within 50m of the pit in an area of inadequate drill coverage. We look forward to the remaining results from the program.”
==> picture [364 x 398] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 2: Jungle Well and Brilliant Well project location with current and planned exploration activities.
Page 2 of 14
==> picture [66 x 32] intentionally omitted <==
Jungle Well Resource Drilling
RC drilling was completed in April 2021 at the Jungle Well prospect, totalling 33 holes for 2872m.
Approximately 50m north of the existing open pit a small stockpile of oxide material has prohibited drilling access. Site works for this program allowed access to test beneath the stockpile with three lines of shallow RC drilling. Wet surface conditions prevented access to the western ends of the lines limiting up dip investigation of the mineralised intervals. Beneath the stockpile the oxide zones intersected by the drilling are often strongly ferruginous saprolite with quartz veining (up to 5%), which hosts the highgrade gold assays including 2m @ 16.13g/t from 46m.
Geology intersected in most of the drilling corresponds to previous drilling with zones of quartz veining, sulphides (and oxides after sulphides) and structure intersected where the main mineralised shear zone was interpreted. Positive results from fresh rock beneath the existing pit and intersecting the extremities of the current Mineral Resource Estimate include 7m @ 1.85 g/t Au from 99m. The southernmost section drilled in this program has confirmed the mineralised shear is displaced by an apparent west block down movement on a steep easterly dipping structure.
Assay results for 12 holes have been returned and reported here, the remainder are pending. Impact Drilling were contracted to undertake the drilling, successfully completing the drilling and exceeding production requirements. Samples were submitted to SGS in Perth for gold analysis by 30g fire assay.
==> picture [456 x 288] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 3: Section A – A’ looking North showing mineralisation and shallow dipping shear zone.
Page 3 of 14
==> picture [66 x 32] intentionally omitted <==
Jungle Well North
Southern Geoscience Consulting (SGC) have scheduled an MLEM geophysical survey team for July to undertake the ground survey north of Jungle Well. The ground survey will test for the extension of historical conductors that are considered prospective for gold mineralisation. The survey follows on from successful historic EM results aiming to extend the conductors north or M37/135 in adjoining tenement E37/909. The potential of these conductors is demonstrated by the success of previous exploration diamond drilling. The drilling which aimed to test a strong conductor for Nickel mineralisation, intersected a wide zone of sulphide mineralised porphyry with significant intersections including NJWD002 13.2m @ 1.74g/t Au from 276m and NJWD003 11.4m @ 0.33g.t Au from 225m. (ASX:PVW, Thred Prospectus Appendix A - Independent Geologists Report, Appendix 1)
==> picture [454 x 457] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 4: Jungle Well previous MLEM survey image with conductors and location of significant intervals from Diamond Drillholes. Satellite photo over magnetic image as background.
Page 4 of 14
==> picture [66 x 32] intentionally omitted <==
Competent Person’s Statement
The information in this document relating to gold exploration activities is based on information compiled by Mr Karl Weber, a professional geologist with over 25 years’ experience in minerals geology including senior management, consulting, exploration, resource estimation, and development. Mr Weber completed a Bachelor of Science with Honours at Curtin University in 1994; is a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (Member No. 306422) and thus holds the relevant qualifications as Competent Person as defined in the JORC Code. Mr Weber is a full-time employee of PVW Resources. Mr Weber has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Weber consents to the inclusion in this document of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.
Authorisation
This announcement has been authorised for release by the Board of PVW Resources Limited. For further information, please contact:
George Bauk Joe Graziano Executive Director Company Secretary +61 408 931 746 +61 411 649 551
Page 5 of 14
==> picture [66 x 32] intentionally omitted <==
About PVW Resources:
==> picture [277 x 399] intentionally omitted <==
Leonora Project – 100% 195km[2]
The company owns 100% Jungle Well and the Brilliant Well projects both with immediate follow up targets. Jungle Well has a 26,800oz Au inferred resource JORC12 compliant, the open pit was mined previously in 1996 during a low gold price. Drilling plans to explore the extension of the existing resource and along strike following up an intersection of 13.2m @ 1.74 g/t which was drilled exploring for Nickel.
The Brilliant Well Project is south of the Bundarra Gold Project (owned by Northern Star) with gold intersections from various drilling programs in 2011 and by PVW in 2019 which included 4m @ 4.09 g/t and 10m @ 3.36 g/t in historical 2011 drilling.
All Leonora Project exploration drilling results refer to ASX:PVW, Thred Prospectus Appendix A - Independent Geologists Report, Appendix 1.
Jungle Well Deposit November 2019 Maiden Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate - (0.5g/t Au Cut off)
| (0.5g/t Au Cut-off) | |
|---|---|
| Type | Tonnage Au Au Kt g/t Ounces |
| LG Stockpile Oxide Transitional Fresh |
7 1.3 300 210 1.0 6,800 309 1.1 10,600 208 1.4 9,200 |
| Total | 735 1.1 26,800 |
Note:
Refer to the Thred Ltd website Prospectus – Appendix A - Independent Geologists Report, 2.4 Mineral Resource Estimation – Jungle Well Deposit. The Company confirms that all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the estimates continue to apply and have not materially changed at the time of publication.
Page 6 of 14
==> picture [66 x 32] intentionally omitted <==
Tanami Project – 100% ~1,000km[2]
The Tanami Region hosts the large Callie gold deposit currently being mined by Newmont. Limited exploration has been undertaken in the Tanami and many view this area as highly prospective and very underexplored. Over the past 3 years the company has put together a 1,000km[2 ] contiguous land package with solid geological information and historical drill results that require immediate follow up. Previous exploration in the early 2010’s resulted in 12m @ 2.94 g/t from surface and 5m @ 6.99 g/t also from surface. All historical Tanami Project exploration drilling results refer to ASX:PVW, Thred Prospectus Appendix A - Independent Geologists Report, Appendix 1.
Kalgoorlie Project – 100% 96km[2]
Right in and amongst the heartland of gold in Western Australia, PVW has a 96km2 tenement package within close proximity to many operating gold processing plants. Near term drill targets: Regional Bedrock Targets including previous drill results including 6m @ 2.61 g/t and 4m @ 2.39 g/t and new conceptual targets. Significant drill results in granites and within greenstones. Paleochannel targets with possible links to bedrock mineralisation. All historical Kalgoorlie Project exploration drilling results refer to ASX:PVW, Thred Prospectus Appendix A - Independent Geologists Report, Appendix 1.
Right place for the right times for the right commodity
Western Australia is one of the leading investment jurisdictions according to the recent Fraser Institute rankings. During the challenging times we live in during COVID-19 all our projects and people are in Western Australia with excellent access to the projects. Finally, Western Australia is a global leader in gold production and gold exploration.
Page 7 of 14
==> picture [66 x 32] intentionally omitted <==
Table 1: RC collar details.
| Hole_ID | Easting (m) | Northing (m) | RL (m) | Dipo | Azimutho | Hole Depth (m) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21JWRC024 | 304223 | 6855767 | 441 | -55 | 215 | 126 |
| 21JWRC025 | 304243 | 6855786 | 441 | -56 | 215 | 110 |
| 21JWRC026 | 304208 | 6855787 | 441 | -55 | 225 | 114 |
| 21JWRC027 | 304207 | 6855822 | 441 | -56 | 220 | 111 |
| 21JWRC028 | 304179 | 6855864 | 442 | -60 | 225 | 113 |
| 21JWRC029 | 304141 | 6855896 | 444 | -56 | 225 | 100 |
| 21JWRC030 | 304110 | 6855970 | 441 | -56 | 224 | 110 |
| 21JWRC031 | 304086 | 6855982 | 443 | -56 | 223 | 111 |
| 21JWRC032 | 303973 | 6856053 | 443 | -56 | 180 | 85 |
| 21JWRC033 | 303881 | 6856079 | 441 | -56 | 229 | 55 |
| 21JWRC034 | 303901 | 6856098 | 443 | -56 | 235 | 73 |
| 21JWRC035 | 303888 | 6856118 | 444 | -56 | 222 | 75 |
| 21JWRC036 | 303867 | 6856097 | 444 | -55 | 225 | 60 |
| 21JWRC037 | 303846 | 6856077 | 441 | -56 | 226 | 48 |
| 21JWRC038 | 303864 | 6856062 | 441 | -56 | 234 | 45 |
| 21JWRC039 | 303871 | 6856038 | 441 | -56 | 223 | 44 |
| 21JWRC040 | 303807 | 6856108 | 441 | -55 | 225 | 40 |
| 21JWRC041 | 303829 | 6856095 | 441 | -55 | 224 | 45 |
| 21JWRC042 | 303848 | 6856114 | 441 | -55 | 220 | 52 |
| 21JWRC043 | 303867 | 6856133 | 441 | -55 | 222 | 70 |
| 21JWRC044 | 303908 | 6856137 | 444 | -55 | 221 | 84 |
| 21JWRC045 | 303939 | 6856093 | 444 | -55 | 212 | 84 |
| 21JWRC046 | 303955 | 6856120 | 443 | -55 | 214 | 95 |
| 21JWRC047 | 303954 | 6856084 | 444 | -54 | 228 | 90 |
| 21JWRC048 | 303972 | 6856102 | 443 | -55 | 229 | 100 |
| 21JWRC049 | 303991 | 6856120 | 443 | -54 | 226 | 110 |
| 21JWRC050 | 303993 | 6856088 | 443 | -55 | 226 | 100 |
| 21JWRC051 | 304036 | 6856129 | 441 | -55 | 226 | 130 |
| 21JWRC052 | 303971 | 6856066 | 443 | -54 | 224 | 85 |
| 21JWRC053 | 304018 | 6856056 | 444 | -55 | 223 | 95 |
| 21JWRC054 | 304041 | 6856043 | 444 | -55 | 224 | 105 |
| 21JWRC055 | 304033 | 6856084 | 444 | -50 | 225 | 110 |
| 21JWRC056 | 304058 | 6856025 | 444 | -54 | 228 | 115 |
Page 8 of 14
==> picture [66 x 32] intentionally omitted <==
Table 2: Significant Au Results >0.2g/t Au.
| Hole_ID | Depth_From (m) |
Depth_To (m) |
Interval (m) |
Au (ppm) |
Intersection (g/t Au) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21JWRC024 | 98 | 100 | 2 | 3.42 | 2m @ 3.42 g/t Au |
| 109 | 110 | 1 | 0.33 | 1m @ 0.33 g/t Au | |
| 21JWRC025 | 80 | 84 | 4 | 0.5 | 4m @ 0.5 g/t Au1 |
| 93 | 96 | 3 | 0.21 | 3m @ 0.21 g/t Au | |
| 21JWRC026 | 80 | 91 | 11 | 0.46 | 11m @ 0.46 g/t Au |
| 21JWRC027 | 98 | 103 | 5 | 0.77 | 5m @ 0.77 g/t Au |
| 21JWRC028 | 99 | 100 | 1 | 0.35 | 1m @ 0.35 g/t Au |
| 21JWRC029 | 82 | 85 | 3 | 1.81 | 3m @ 1.81 g/t Au |
| 21JWRC030 | 104 | 108 | 4 | 0.61 | 4m @ 0.61 g/t Au |
| 21JWRC031 | 99 | 106 | 7 | 1.85 | 7m @ 1.85 g/t Au |
| 21JWRC032 | 75 | 80 | 5 | 0.79 | 5m @ 0.79 g/t Au |
| 21JWRC033 | 10 | 14 | 4 | 1.39 | 4m @ 1.39 g/t Au |
| 46 | 55 | 9 | 3.87 | 9m @ 3.87 g/t Au | |
| Including | 46 | 48 | 2 | 16.13 | 2m @ 16.13 g/t Au |
| 21JWRC034 | 48 | 60 | 12 | 0.68 | 12m @ 0.68 g/t Au1 |
| 21JWRC035 | 24 | 36 | 12 | 0.27 | 12m @ 0.27 g/t Au1 |
| 52 | 64 | 12 | 0.29 | 12m @ 0.29 g/t Au1 |
Note 1: These assays are from 4m composite samples.
Page 9 of 14
==> picture [66 x 32] intentionally omitted <==
Leonora – Jungle Well RC Drilling
JORC CODE, 2012 Edition Table 1
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Sampling techniques |
• Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. • Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. • Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. |
• PVW has utilised RC drilling. • Holes were angled to intersect the targeted mineralised zones at optimal angles. • RC holes are sampled over the entire length of hole. RC drilling was sampled at 1m intervals via an on-board cyclone and cone splitter. From the drill sample a 2-3kg 1m split was collected at the cone splitter in a numbered calico bag or a 4m composite sample of 2-3kg sample was collected from the drill sample. Samples are prepared and pulverised at the laboratory to produce a 30g charge for fire assay. |
| Drilling techniques |
• Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). |
• For RC holes, a 5¼” face sampling bit was used. |
| Drill sample recovery |
• Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed. • Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. • Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. |
• Recoveries from RC drilling were recorded in the database and recovery was generally good. • Drill samples recovery is maximised by using a modern sampling system including a cone splitter. • No relationship exists between sample recovery and grade. |
| Logging | • Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. • Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, |
• All RC drill holes were logged for geology, alteration and structure. All RC chip trays were photographed. • All drill holes were logged in full, by qualitative methods. |
Page 10 of 14
==> picture [66 x 32] intentionally omitted <==
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| channel, etc) photography. • The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. |
||
| Sub- sampling techniques and sample preparation |
• If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. • If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. • For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. • Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples. • Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling. • Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled. |
• PVW RC samples were collected via on- board cone splitters. Most samples were dry. Sample quality was maintained by monitoring sample volume and by cleaning splitters on a regular basis. • Duplicates were mostly taken at 1 in 50. Following the return of results, a dedicated duplicate sampling routine of mineralised material will be completed. • Sample preparation was conducted by a contract laboratory. After drying, the sample is subject to a primary crush, then pulverised to 85% passing 75µm. • Sample sizes are considered appropriate to correctly represent the gold mineralisation based on the style of mineralisation, the thickness and consistency of the intersections, the sampling methodology and assay value ranges for gold. |
| Quality of assay data and laboratory tests |
• The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. • For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. • Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established. |
• For PVW drilling, the analytical technique used was a 30g lead collection fire assay and analysed by microwave plasma- atomic emission spectroscopy. This is a full digestion technique. Samples were analysed at SGS Laboratories in Perth Western Australia. • QAQC procedures involved the use of certified reference materials (1 in 40), field duplicates (1 in 50) and/or blanks (1 in 50). Results were assessed for QAQC and confirmed for release. • Laboratory QAQC includes the use of internal standards using certified reference material, blanks, splits and replicates. • Certified reference materials demonstrate that sample assay values are accurate. |
| Verification of sampling and assaying |
• The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. • The use of twinned holes. • Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. • Discuss any adjustment to assay data. |
• Significant intersections were visually field verified by company geologists. • No twin holes were completed by PVW, although verification drilling was completed with holes between existing holes. • Primary data was collected into an Excel spread sheet and then imported into a Data Shed database. • Assay values that were below detection limit were adjusted to equal half of the detection limit value. |
| Location of data points |
• Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. • Specification of the grid system used. • Quality and adequacy of topographic |
• All PVW hole collars were pegged in MGA94 Zone 51 grid using a hand held GPS and using existing holes as reference to improve position accuracy. • PVW holes were down hole surveyed with AXIS gyro tool. • Topographic surface wasprepared from |
Page 11 of 14
==> picture [66 x 32] intentionally omitted <==
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| control. | a detailed UAVsurvey. | |
| Data spacing and distribution |
• Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. • Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. • Whether sample compositing has been applied. |
• For the PVW drilling at Jungle Well, the nominal hole spacing of surface drilling is approximately 20 - 60m. • The mineralised domains have sufficient continuity in both geology and grade to be considered appropriate for the Mineral Resource classification applied under the 2012 JORC Code. • Samples have been composited to 1m lengths in mineralised lodes using best fit techniques prior to estimation. |
| Orientation of data in relation to geological structure |
• Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. • If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. |
• At Jungle Well, surface drill holes are angled to 50 - 60 degrees which is approximately perpendicular to the orientation of the expected trend of mineralisation. • No orientation-based sampling bias has been identified in the data. |
| Sample security |
• The measures taken to ensure sample security. |
• Chain of custody is managed by PVW. Samples are stored on site until collected for transport to the sample preparation laboratory in Perth. PVW personnel have no contact with the samples once they are picked up for transport. |
| Audits or reviews |
• The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. |
• No detailed audits or reviews have yet been conducted due to the level of work completed at the Project to date. |
Page 12 of 14
==> picture [66 x 32] intentionally omitted <==
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Mineral tenement and land tenure status |
• Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. • The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a license to operate in the area. |
• Jungle Well is an inactive open pit gold mine which competed in 1996. The deposit is located within Mining Lease 37/135 and is owned by PVW Leonora Pty Ltd, a wholly owned subsidiary of PVW Resources Ltd. • The tenements are in good standing. |
| Exploration done by other parties |
• Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. |
• At Jungle Well previous companies that have undertaken exploration include WMC, Dominion Mining, Triton Resources, Jubilee Mines, Australian Gold Mines, and Breakaway Resources. • Jubilee Mines completed substantial FLEM and MLEM ground geophysical surveys within M37/135. This data has been reprocessed by SGC for the purpose or targeting and design of further MLEM and FLEM surveys. |
| Geology | • Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. |
• Jungle Well is a structurally controlled, shear hosted gold deposit located within Archean Kalgoorlie Domain, local geology is dominated by variably deformed high Mg basalt and volcaniclastic equivalents. |
| Drill hole information |
• A summary of all information material to the under-standing of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: • easting and northing of the drill hole collar • elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar • dip and azimuth of the hole • down hole length and interception depth • hole length • If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case. |
• All drillhole information for the current program has been included, with drill hole collar information recorded in text as Table 1 and significant intervals recorded in text as Table 2. No drill hole information has been excluded. • Historical drill hole information excluded from this report is not required to understand the report. All previous drill hole information is included in ASX:PVW, Thred Prospectus Appendix A - Independent Geologists Report, Appendix 1. |
| Data aggregation methods |
• In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. • Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation |
• No grade cuts are applied to the results. • Aggregate intercepts can include up to 4m of waste, assuming the interval is not less than 0.2g/t Au, All assays reported are 4m composite results or 1m sample results. High grade internal intervals included in wider lower grade intervals are reported. • Metal equivalent values have not been used. |
Page 13 of 14
==> picture [66 x 32] intentionally omitted <==
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. • The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated. |
||
| Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths |
• These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. • If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. • If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (e.g. ‘down _hole length, true width not known’). _ |
• At Jungle Well, surface drill holes are angled 50-60 degrees which is approximately perpendicular to the orientation of the expected trend of mineralisation. • It is interpreted that true width is approximately 80-100% of down hole intersections. |
| Diagrams | • Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported. These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views. |
• Relevant diagrams have been included within the text of the report. Sectional views of selected results are included to demonstrate the nature of the mineralisation and weathering. |
| Balanced Reporting |
• Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results. |
• All significant Exploration Results have been included and are shown diagrammatically in relation to unmineralized drillholes. |
| Other substantive exploration data |
• Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples - size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances. |
• All interpretations for Jungle Well mineralisation are consistent with observations made and information gained during previous mining and recent drilling. |
| Further work | • The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g. tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large- scale step-out drilling). • Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive. |
• Further broad spaced drilling is planned along strike and at depth to test mineralisation potential of the Project area. Shallow drilling up dip of current results is required to further define oxide mineralisation. Further infill drilling will be conducted prior to any mining activities. • Results of the complete program are awaited to clearly highlight possible extensions and future drilling areas. |
Page 14 of 14