Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

UDR, Inc. Annual Report 2005

Mar 7, 2006

30426_10-k_2006-03-07_2578a300-c7e3-4b6b-959d-7a106dbf78d3.zip

Annual Report

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

10-K 1 d33186e10vk.htm FORM 10-K e10vk PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-K

þ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005

or

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from __ to ___

Commission file number 1-10524

UNITED DOMINION REALTY TRUST, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland 54-0857512
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)

1745 Shea Center Drive, Suite 200, Highlands Ranch, Colorado 80129 (Address of principal executive offices) (zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (720) 283-6120

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Common Stock, $0.01 par value New York Stock Exchange
Preferred Stock Purchase Rights New York Stock Exchange
8.60% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock New York Stock Exchange
8.50% Monthly Income Notes Due 2008 New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by checkmark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or other information statements incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer þ Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

The aggregate market value of the shares of common stock held by non-affiliates on June 30, 2005 was approximately $3.3 billion. This calculation excludes shares of common stock held by the registrant’s officers and directors and each person known by the registrant to beneficially own more than 5% of the registrant’s outstanding shares, as such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status should not be deemed conclusive for any other purpose. As of February 24, 2006 there were 134,286,524 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

The information required by Part III of this Report, to the extent not set forth herein, is incorporated by reference from the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 2, 2006.

PAGEBREAK

TOC

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I.
Item 1. Business 2
Item 1A. Risk Factors 11
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments 16
Item 2. Properties 17
Item 3. Legal Proceedings 18
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 18
PART II.
Item 5. Market for
Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities 18
Item 6. Selected Financial Data 21
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 22
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 37
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 37
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure 37
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures 37
Item 9B. Other Information 38
PART III.
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant 38
Item 11. Executive Compensation 38
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters 38
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions 39
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services 39
PART IV.
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules 39
Amended and Restated Bylaws
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
Subsidiaries
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the CEO
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the CFO
Section 1350 Certification of the CEO
Section 1350 Certification of the CFO

/TOC

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

PART I

Item 1. BUSINESS

General

United Dominion Realty Trust, Inc. is a self administered real estate investment trust, or REIT, that owns, acquires, renovates, develops, and manages apartment communities nationwide. At December 31, 2005, our apartment portfolio included 259 communities located in 43 markets, with a total of 74,875 completed apartment homes. In addition, we had five apartment communities under development.

We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code. To continue to qualify as a REIT, we must continue to meet certain tests which, among other things, generally require that our assets consist primarily of real estate assets, our income be derived primarily from real estate assets, and that we distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (other than our net capital gain) to our stockholders. As a qualified REIT, we generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income taxes at the corporate level on our net income to the extent we distribute such net income to our stockholders. In 2005, we declared total distributions of $1.20 per share to our stockholders, which represents our 29th year of consecutive dividend increases to our stockholders.

We were formed in 1972 as a Virginia corporation. In June 2003, we changed our state of incorporation from Virginia to Maryland. Our corporate headquarters is located at 400 East Cary Street, Richmond, Virginia. Our principal executive offices are located at 1745 Shea Center Drive, Suite 200, Highlands Ranch, Colorado. As of February 24, 2006, we had 1,900 full-time employees and 136 part-time employees.

Our subsidiaries include two operating partnerships, Heritage Communities L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, and United Dominion Realty L.P., a Delaware limited partnership. Unless the context otherwise requires, all references in this Report to “we,” “us,” “our,” “the company,” or “United Dominion” refer collectively to United Dominion Realty Trust, Inc. and its subsidiaries.

2005 Accomplishments

• We increased our dividend for the 29th consecutive year.
• We completed over $1.5 billion of capital transactions in 2005.
• We amended our credit facility and extended its term for an additional two years,
thereby reducing our costs.
• We acquired 2,561 apartment homes in eight communities for
approximately $390.9
million and one parcel of land for $2.9 million.
• We completed the disposition of 22 apartment communities with 6,352 apartment homes
for an aggregate sales price of approximately $387.2 million and one parcel of land for
$0.9 million. In addition,
we sold 240 condominiums within five communities for a total of
$69.1 million and our investment in an unconsolidated joint
venture for $39.2 million.

Business Objectives and Operating Strategies

Our principal business objective is to maximize the economic returns of our apartment communities to provide our stockholders with the greatest possible total return and value. To achieve this objective, we intend to continue to pursue the following goals and strategies:

• own and operate apartments across a national platform, thus enhancing stability and predictability of returns to our stockholders,

2

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

| • | manage real estate cycles by taking an opportunistic approach to buying, selling,
and building apartment communities, |
| --- | --- |
| • | empower site associates to manage our communities efficiently and effectively, |
| • | measure and reward associates based on specific performance targets, and |
| • | manage our capital structure to ensure predictability of earnings and dividends. |

Acquisitions

During 2005, using the proceeds from our disposition program, as well as equity and debt offerings, we acquired eight communities with 2,561 apartment homes at a total cost of approximately $390.9 million, including the assumption of secured debt. In addition, we purchased one parcel of land for $2.9 million.

When evaluating potential acquisitions, we consider:

| • | population growth, cost of alternative housing, overall potential for economic
growth and the tax and regulatory environment of the community in which the property is
located, |
| --- | --- |
| • | geographic location, including proximity to our existing communities which can
deliver significant economies of scale, |
| • | construction quality, condition and design of the community, |
| • | current and projected cash flow of the property and the ability to increase cash flow, |
| • | potential for capital appreciation of the property, |
| • | ability to increase the value and profitability of the property through upgrades and repositioning, |
| • | terms of resident leases, including the potential for rent increases, |
| • | occupancy and demand by residents for properties of a similar type in the vicinity, |
| • | prospects for liquidity through sale, financing, or refinancing of the property, and |
| • | competition from existing multifamily communities and the potential for the
construction of new multifamily properties in the area. |

The following table summarizes our apartment acquisitions and our year-end ownership position for the past five years ( dollars in thousands ):

2005 2004 2003 2002 2001
Homes acquired 2,561 8,060 5,220 4,611 1,304
Homes owned at December 31 74,875 78,855 76,244 74,480 77,567
Total real estate owned,
at carrying value $ 5,512,424 $ 5,243,296 $ 4,351,551 $ 3,967,483 $ 3,907,667

Dispositions

We regularly monitor and adjust our assets to increase portfolio profitability. During 2005, we sold over 6,300 of our slower growing, non-core apartment homes while exiting some markets in an effort to increase the quality and

3

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

performance of our portfolio. Proceeds from the disposition program were used primarily to reduce debt and fund acquisitions.

Factors we consider in deciding whether to dispose of a property include:

• current market price for an asset compared to projected economics for that asset,
• potential increases in new construction in the market area,
• areas where the economy is not expected to grow substantially, and
• markets where we do not intend to establish long-term concentration.

At December 31, 2005, there were four communities with a total of 384 condominiums and two parcels of land classified as real estate held for disposition. We are in the market for replacement properties that will correspond with our expected sales activity to prevent dilution to earnings.

Upgrading and Development Activities

During 2005, we continued to reposition properties in targeted markets where there was an opportunity to add value and achieve greater than inflationary increases in rents over the long term. In 2005, we spent $49.3 million on five development projects that are expected to be completed in 2006 and 2007. Revenue enhancing capital expenditures, including kitchen and bath renovations, and other extensive interior upgrades totaled $98.6 million or $1,302 per home for the year ended December 31, 2005. In addition, we spent $18.7 million on major renovation projects that included major structural changes and/or architectural revisions to existing buildings and the wiring and/or re-plumbing of an entire building.

The following wholly owned projects were under development as of December 31, 2005:

Apartment Apartment Cost to — Date Budgeted — Cost Estimated — Cost Expected — Completion
Homes Homes (In thousands) (In thousands) Per Home Date
Verano at Town Square 414 66 $ 55,653 $ 66,300 $ 160,100 1Q06
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Mandalay on the Lake 369 — 26,339 30,900 83,700 2Q06
Irving, TX
2000 Post — Phase III 24 — 4,835 9,000 375,000 2Q06
San Francisco, CA
Ridgeview 225 — 6,883 18,000 80,000 1Q07
Plano, TX
Lincoln
Towne Square — Phase II 303 — 3,007 21,000 69,300 3Q07
Plano, TX
1,335 66 $ 96,717 $ 145,200 $ 108,800

In addition, we owned four parcels of land held for future development aggregating $20.8 million at December 31, 2005.

Financing Activities

As part of our plan to strengthen our capital structure, we utilized proceeds from dispositions, debt and equity offerings and refinancings to extend maturities, pay down existing debt, and acquire apartment communities. The following is a summary of our major financing activities in 2005:

§ Repaid $133.8 million of secured debt and $70.9 million of unsecured debt, and incurred $8.5 million in prepayment penalties.

4

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

| § | Sold $50 million aggregate principal amount of 5.25% senior unsecured notes due January
2015 in February 2005 under our medium-term note program. These notes represent a
re-opening of the 5.25% senior unsecured notes due January 2015 that were issued in
November 2004, and these notes constitute a single series of notes. The February 2005
issuance of these notes brought the aggregate principal amount of the 5.25% senior
unsecured notes to $150 million. The net proceeds of approximately $50 million were used
for debt repayment and to fund the acquisition of apartment communities. |
| --- | --- |
| § | Sold our shares in Rent.com, a leading Internet listing web site in the apartment and
rental housing industry, in February 2005. As a result, we received cash proceeds and
recorded a one-time gain of $12.3 million on the sale. As part of the transaction, an
additional $0.8 million was placed in escrow and will be recorded as revenue when received. |
| § | Sold $50 million aggregate principal amount of 5.25% senior unsecured notes due January
2015 in March 2005 under our medium-term note program. These notes represent a re-opening
of the 5.25% senior unsecured notes due January 2015 that were issued in November 2004, and
these notes constitute a single series of notes. The March 2005 issuance of these notes
brought the aggregate principal amount of the 5.25% senior unsecured notes to $200 million.
The net proceeds of approximately $50 million were used for debt repayment and to fund the
acquisition of apartment communities. |
| § | Sold $50 million aggregate principal amount of 5.25% senior unsecured notes due January
2015 in May 2005 under our medium-term note program. These notes represent a re-opening of
the 5.25% senior unsecured notes due January 2015 that were issued in November 2004, and
these notes constitute a single series of notes. The May 2005 issuance of these notes
brought the aggregate principal amount of the 5.25% senior unsecured notes to $250 million.
The net proceeds of approximately $50 million were used for debt repayment and to fund the
acquisition of apartment communities. |
| § | Amended and restated our $500 million unsecured revolving credit facility and extended
the term an additional two years. The credit facility matures on May 31, 2008, and, at our
option, can be extended for an additional year. We have the right to increase the credit
facility to $750 million if the initial lenders increase their commitments or we receive
commitments from additional lenders. Based on our current credit ratings, the credit
facility carries an interest rate equal to LIBOR plus a spread of 57.5 basis points, which
represents a 12.5 basis point reduction to the previous unsecured revolver, and the
facility fee was reduced from 20 basis points to 15 basis points. Under a competitive bid
feature and for so long as we maintain an Investment Grade Rating, we have the right to bid
out 100% of the commitment amount. |
| § | Converted a $75 million variable rate debt facility to a fixed rate of 4.86% on December
1, 2005. |
| § | Sold $100 million aggregate principal amount of 5.25% medium-term notes due January 2016
in September 2005 under our medium-term note program. The net proceeds of approximately
$100 million were used for debt repayment. |
| § | Sold $250 million aggregate principal amount of our 4.00% convertible senior notes due
2035 in December 2005. We used the net proceeds of approximately $245 million to repay
outstanding debt under our unsecured revolving bank credit facility
and to repurchase shares of our common stock. |
| § | Repurchased 1,069,500 shares of our common stock at an average price per share of $22.08 under our
common stock repurchase program and repurchased 2,110,850 shares of
our common stock at an average price per share of $23.51 in
connection with the offering of our 4.00% convertible senior notes due 2035. As of
December 31, 2005, approximately 1.2 million shares of common stock remained available for
repurchase under the common stock repurchase program. |

Markets and Competitive Conditions

At December 31, 2005, we owned 259 apartment communities in 43 markets in 16 states. When comparing fourth quarter 2005 to the same period in the prior year, 84% of the portfolio generated positive revenue growth and 69% of the portfolio generated positive net operating income growth. We have a geographically diverse portfolio

5

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

and we believe that this diversification increases investment opportunity and decreases the risk associated with cyclical local real estate markets and economies, thereby increasing the stability and predictability of our earnings.

We believe changing demographics will have a significant impact on the apartment industry over the next two decades. In particular, we believe the annual number of young people entering the workforce and creating households will be significantly higher over the next 10 to 15 years as compared to the number who entered the workforce over the past 10 years. The number of single people and single parent households continues to grow significantly. The immigrant population is also expected to grow at an accelerated pace. Each of these population segments has a high propensity to rent.

In many of our markets, competition for new residents is intense. Some competing communities offer features that our communities do not have. Competing communities frequently use concessions or lower rents to obtain temporary competitive advantages. Also, some competing communities are larger or newer than our communities. The competitive position of each community is different depending upon many factors including sub-market supply and demand. In addition, other real estate investors compete with us to acquire existing properties and to develop new properties. These competitors include insurance companies, pension and investment funds, developer partnerships, investment companies and other apartment REITs. This competition could increase prices for properties of the type that we would likely pursue, and our competitors may have greater resources, or lower capital costs, than we do.

We believe that, in general, we are well-positioned to compete effectively for residents and investments. We believe our competitive advantages include:

| • | a fully integrated organization with property management, development, acquisition,
marketing and financing expertise, |
| --- | --- |
| • | scalable operating and support systems, |
| • | purchasing power, |
| • | geographic diversification with a presence in 43 markets across the country, and |
| • | significant presence in many of our major markets that allows us to be a local operating expert. |

Moving forward, we will continue to emphasize aggressive lease management, improved expense control, increased resident retention efforts and the realignment of employee incentive plans tied to our bottom line performance. We believe this plan of operation, coupled with the portfolio’s strengths in targeting renters across a geographically diverse platform, should position us for continued operational improvement.

Communities

At December 31, 2005, our apartment portfolio included 259 communities having a total of 74,875 completed apartment homes. In addition, we had five apartment communities under development. The overall quality of our portfolio has significantly improved since 2001 with the disposition of non-core apartment homes and our upgrade and rehabilitation program. The upgrading of the portfolio provides several key benefits related to portfolio profitability. It enables us to raise rents more significantly and to attract residents with higher levels of disposable income who are more likely to accept the transfer of expenses, such as water and sewer costs, from the landlord to the resident. In addition, it potentially reduces recurring capital expenditures per apartment home, and therefore increases cash flow.

6

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Same Communities

For 2005, same community property operating income increased 3.4% or $10.3 million compared to 2004. The increase in property operating income was primarily attributable to a 3.8% or $18.6 million increase in revenues from rental and other income that was partially offset by a 4.4% or $8.3 million increase in operating expenses. The increase in revenues from rental and other income was primarily driven by a 2.0% or $10.3 million increase in rental rates, a 20.2% or $2.9 million decrease in concession expense, a 7.5% or $2.6 million increase in utility reimbursement income and fee income, a 7.8% or $2.5 million decrease in vacancy loss, and a 15.6% or $0.4 million decrease in bad debt expense. Physical occupancy increased 0.6% to 94.5%.

The increase in property operating expenses was primarily driven by a 4.3% or $2.0 million increase in real estate taxes, a 3.8% or $1.9 million increase in personnel costs, a 3.8% or $1.1 million increase in utilities expense, a 2.9% or $0.9 million increase in repair and maintenance costs, a 4.7% or $0.8 million increase in administrative and marketing costs, a 46.7% or $0.7 million increase in incentive compensation, and a 5.4% or $0.5 million increase in insurance costs.

Customers

Our upgrade and rehabilitation programs enable us to raise rents and attract residents with higher levels of disposable income who are more likely to accept the transfer of expenses, such as water and sewer costs, from the landlord to the resident. We believe this segment provides the highest profit potential in terms of rent growth, stability of occupancy and investment opportunities.

We believe there will be a significant increase in the number of younger renters over the next 10 to 15 years, and that the immigrant population will remain a significant and growing part of the renter base. Accordingly, we plan to target some of our incremental investments to communities that will be attractive to younger households or to the immigrant populations. These communities will often be located close to where these residents work, shop and play.

Tax Matters

We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code. To continue to qualify as a REIT, we must continue to meet certain tests that, among other things, generally require that our assets consist primarily of real estate assets, our income be derived primarily from real estate assets, and that we distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (other than our net capital gain) to our stockholders. Provided we maintain our qualification as a REIT, we generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income taxes at the corporate level on our net income to the extent such net income is distributed to our stockholders. Even if we continue to qualify as a REIT, we will continue to be subject to certain federal, state and local taxes on our income and property.

We may utilize several taxable REIT subsidiaries to engage in activities that REITs may be prohibited from performing, including the provision of management and other services to third parties and the conduct of certain nonqualifying real estate transactions. Taxable REIT subsidiaries generally are taxable as regular corporations and therefore are subject to federal, state and local income taxes.

Inflation

Substantially all of our leases are for a term of one year or less, which may enable us to realize increased rents upon renewal of existing leases or the beginning of new leases. Such short-term leases generally minimize the risk to us of the adverse effects of inflation, although as a general rule these leases permit residents to leave at the end of the lease term without penalty. Short-term leases and relatively consistent demand allow rents, and therefore cash flow from the portfolio, to provide an attractive hedge against inflation.

Environmental Matters

Various environmental laws govern certain aspects of the ongoing operation of our communities. Such environmental laws include those regulating the existence of asbestos-containing materials in buildings, management of surfaces with lead-based paint (and notices of residents about the lead-based paint), use of active underground petroleum storage tanks, and waste-management activities. The failure to comply with such requirements could subject us to a government enforcement action and/or claims for damages by a private party.

To date, compliance with federal, state and local environmental protection regulations has not had a material effect on our capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position. We have a property management plan for hazardous materials. As part of the plan, Phase I environmental site investigations and reports have been completed for each property we own. In addition, all proposed acquisitions are inspected prior to acquisition. The inspections are conducted by qualified environmental consultants, and we review the issued report prior to the purchase or development of any property. Nevertheless, it is possible that our environmental

7

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

assessments will not reveal all environmental liabilities, or that some material environmental liabilities exist of which we are unaware. In some cases, we have abandoned otherwise economically attractive acquisitions because the costs of removal or control of hazardous materials have been prohibitive or we have been unwilling to accept the potential risks involved. We do not believe we will be required to engage in any large-scale abatement at any of our properties. We believe that through professional environmental inspections and testing for asbestos, lead paint and other hazardous materials, coupled with a conservative posture toward accepting known risk, we can minimize our exposure to potential liability associated with environmental hazards.

Federal legislation requires owners and landlords of residential housing constructed prior to 1978 to disclose to potential residents or purchasers of the communities any known lead paint hazards and imposes treble damages for failure to provide such notification. In addition, lead based paint in any of the communities may result in lead poisoning in children residing in that community if chips or particles of such lead based paint are ingested, and we may be held liable under state laws for any such injuries caused by ingestion of lead based paint by children living at the communities.

We are unaware of any environmental hazards at any of our properties that individually or in the aggregate may have a material adverse impact on our operations or financial position. We have not been notified by any governmental authority, and we are not otherwise aware, of any material non-compliance, liability, or claim relating to environmental liabilities in connection with any of our properties. We do not believe that the cost of continued compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations will have a material adverse effect on us or our financial condition or results of operations. Future environmental laws, regulations, or ordinances, however, may require additional remediation of existing conditions that are not currently actionable. Also, if more stringent requirements are imposed on us in the future, the costs of compliance could have a material adverse effect on us and our financial condition.

Insurance

We carry comprehensive general liability coverage on our communities, with limits of liability customary within the industry to insure against liability claims and related defense costs. We are also insured, in all material respects, against the risk of direct physical damage in amounts necessary to reimburse us on a replacement cost basis for costs incurred to repair or rebuild each property, including loss of rental income during the reconstruction period.

Executive Officers of the Company

The following table sets forth information about our executive officers as of March 3, 2006. The executive officers listed below serve in their respective capacities at the discretion of our board of directors.

Name — Thomas W. Toomey 45 Office — Chief Executive Officer - 2001
President and Director
W. Mark Wallis 55 Senior Executive Vice President 2001
Christopher D. Genry 45 Executive Vice President — Corporate 2001
Strategy & Chief Financial Officer
Richard A. Giannotti 50 Executive Vice President — Asset Quality 1985
Sara Jo Light 60 Executive Vice President — 2005
Director of Talent Management
Martha R. Carlin 43 Executive Vice President — 2001
Director of Property Operations

8

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Name — Lester C. Boeckel 57 Office — Senior Vice President — 2001
Dispositions & Acquisitions
Patrick S. Gregory 56 Senior Vice President — 1997
Chief Information Officer
Michael J. Kelly 38 Senior Vice President — 2004
Acquisitions
Scott A. Shanaberger 37 Senior Vice President — 1994
Chief Accounting Officer
& Assistant Secretary
Thomas A. Spangler 45 Senior Vice President — 1998
Business Development
& Chief Risk Officer
Mark E. Wood 53 Senior Vice President — 1994
Development
Mary Ellen Norwood 51 Vice President — 2001
Legal Administration
& Secretary

Set forth below is certain biographical information about each of our executive officers.

Mr. Toomey joined us as Chief Executive Officer, President and a director in February 2001. Prior to joining us, Mr. Toomey was with Apartment Investment and Management Company, or AIMCO, a publicly traded real estate investment trust, where he served as Chief Operating Officer for two years and Chief Financial Officer for four years. During his tenure at AIMCO, Mr. Toomey was instrumental in the growth of AIMCO from 34,000 apartment units to 360,000 units. He has also served as a Senior Vice President at Lincoln Property Company, a national real estate development, property management and real estate consulting company, from 1990 to 1995. He currently serves as a member of the board of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts and the National MultiHousing Council and he serves as Co-Chairman of the Homeland Security Task Force of the Real Estate Roundtable.

Mr. Wallis joined us in March 2001 as Senior Executive Vice President responsible for legal, acquisitions, dispositions, and development. Prior to joining us, Mr. Wallis was the President of Golden Living Communities, a company he established in 1995, involved in the development of assisted and independent living communities. Prior to founding Golden Living, Mr. Wallis was Executive Vice President of Finance and Administration of Lincoln Property Company.

Mr. Genry joined us in March 2001 as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and was named Executive Vice President of Corporate Strategy and Chief Financial Officer in 2005. Mr. Genry had been Chief Financial Officer of Centex Construction Group, a $1 billion subsidiary of the New York Stock Exchange listed Centex Corporation. As Chief Financial Officer, he provided strategic leadership in the development and management of all financial and information systems, the redesign and oversight of internal audit functions, and the identification and evaluation of acquisition opportunities. Prior to joining Centex, he was with Arthur Andersen & Co. in Dallas.

Mr. Giannotti joined us as Director of Development and Construction in September 1985. He was elected Assistant Vice President in 1988, Vice President in 1989, and Senior Vice President in 1996. In 1998, Mr. Giannotti was elected Director of Development-East, and was promoted to Executive Vice President — Asset Quality in 2003.

9

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Ms. Light joined us in 2005 as Executive Vice President and Director of Talent Management. Prior to joining us, Ms. Light was the Senior Vice President and Director of Human Resources at Taubman Centers, Inc., one of the pre-eminent retail developers/owners/managers in the United States. Prior to joining Taubman, Ms. Light had over 20 years of human resource experience with various firms both in the United States and abroad.

Ms. Carlin joined us in March 2001 as a Senior Vice President responsible for operational efficiencies and revenue enhancement. She was promoted to Senior Vice President, Director of Property Operations in 2004 and to Executive Vice President, Director of Property Operations in 2005. Ms. Carlin was previously Senior Vice President of Operations for opsXchange, Inc., a real estate procurement technology developer. Previously, she served as Senior Vice President of Ancillary Services at AIMCO and as a member of Arthur Andersen’s Real Estate Services Group.

Mr. Boeckel joined us in July 2001 as Vice President of Dispositions and Acquisitions and was promoted to Senior Vice President in February 2002. Prior to joining United Dominion, Mr. Boeckel was the Senior Vice President of Asset Management at AIMCO. Before becoming the Senior Vice President of Asset Management, Mr. Boeckel was a Regional Vice President with operating responsibility for a portfolio of 12,000 apartment homes. Prior to joining AIMCO, Mr. Boeckel had over ten years of real estate experience with various firms including a regional investment banking firm, a regional financial planning firm, and a national apartment syndication firm.

Mr. Gregory joined us in 1997 as Vice President and Chief Information Officer and was promoted to Senior Vice President in 1999. From 1976 to 1997, Mr. Gregory was employed by Crestar Bank as a New Technology Analyst.

Mr. Kelly joined us in 2003 as Senior Vice President, Acquisitions. Prior to joining United Dominion, Mr. Kelly was Senior Vice President in charge of national apartment acquisitions for Urdang & Associates, a Philadelphia based pension fund advisor. During his tenure, he purchased over 4,100 units. Prior to Urdang, Mr. Kelly was a Principal with Lend Lease focusing on national apartment acquisitions. From 1993 to 1998, Mr. Kelly was Vice President and part owner of Apartment Realty Advisors, an apartment brokerage company.

Mr. Shanaberger joined us in 1994 as an Accounting Manager and was promoted to Assistant Vice President and Assistant Treasurer in 1997. In 2000, Mr. Shanaberger was promoted to Vice President Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer and was promoted to Senior Vice President in 2002. Prior to joining United Dominion, Mr. Shanaberger was employed by Ernst & Young LLP.

Mr. Spangler joined us as Assistant Vice President, Operational Planning and Asset Management in August 1998 and was promoted to Vice President, Director of Operational Planning and Asset Management that same year. Mr. Spangler was promoted to Senior Vice President, Business Development in February 2003, and Chief Risk Officer in September 2003. Prior to joining United Dominion, Mr. Spangler was an Asset Manager for Summit Enterprises, Inc. of Virginia, a private investment management firm for nine years.

Mr. Wood joined us as Vice President of Construction in connection with the merger of SouthWest in 1996. He was promoted to Senior Vice President and Director of Development-West in 2000.

Ms. Norwood joined us in 2001 as Vice President, Legal Administration and Secretary. Prior to joining us, Ms. Norwood was employed by Centex Corporation for 15 years, most recently as its Legal Administrator. Centex is a New York Stock Exchange listed company that operates in the home building, financial services, construction products, construction services, and investment real estate business segments.

10

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Available Information

We file electronically with the Securities and Exchange Commission our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and current reports on Form 8-K, pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. You may obtain a free copy of our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports on the day of filing with the SEC on our website at www.udrt.com , or by sending an e-mail message to [email protected] .

NYSE Certification

On June 1, 2005, our Chief Executive Officer submitted to the New York Stock Exchange the annual certification required by Section 303A.12(a) of the NYSE Listed Company Manual regarding our compliance with NYSE corporate governance listing standards. In addition, the certifications of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer required under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 are filed as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2, respectively, to this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS

There are many factors that affect our business and our results of operations, some of which are beyond our control. The following is a description of important factors that may cause our actual results of operations in future periods to differ materially from those currently expected or desired.

Unfavorable Changes in Apartment Market and Economic Conditions Could Adversely Affect Occupancy Levels and Rental Rates. Market and economic conditions in the metropolitan areas in which we operate may significantly affect our occupancy levels and rental rates and, therefore, our profitability. Factors that may adversely affect these conditions include the following:

• a reduction in jobs and other local economic downturns,
• declines in mortgage interest rates, making alternative housing more affordable,
• government or builder incentives which enable first time homebuyers to put
little or no money down, making alternative housing decisions easier to make,
• oversupply of, or reduced demand for, apartment homes,
• declines in household formation, and
• rent control or stabilization laws, or other laws regulating rental
housing, which could prevent us from raising rents to offset increases in operating
costs.

The strength of the United States economy has become increasingly susceptible to global events and threats of terrorism. At the same time, productivity enhancements and the increased exportation of labor have resulted in limited job growth despite an improving economy. Continued weakness in job creation, or any worsening of current economic conditions, generally and in our principal market areas, could have a material adverse effect on our occupancy levels, our rental rates and our ability to strategically acquire and dispose of apartment communities. This may impair our ability to satisfy our financial obligations and pay distributions to our stockholders.

New Acquisitions, Developments and Condominium Projects May Not Achieve Anticipated Results. We intend to continue to selectively acquire apartment communities that meet our investment criteria and to develop apartment communities for rental operations, to convert properties into condominiums and to develop condominium projects. Our acquisition, development and condominium activities and their success are subject to the following risks:

• an acquired community may fail to perform as we expected in analyzing our investment, or a significant exposure related to the acquired property may go undetected during our due diligence procedures,

11

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

| • | when we acquire an apartment community, we often invest additional amounts
in it with the intention of increasing profitability. These additional investments may
not produce the anticipated improvements in profitability, |
| --- | --- |
| • | new developments may not achieve pro forma rents or occupancy levels, or
problems with construction or local building codes may delay initial occupancy dates
for all or a portion of a development community, and |
| • | an over supply of condominiums in a given market may cause a decrease in the prices at which we expect to sell
condominium properties. |

Possible Difficulty of Selling Apartment Communities Could Limit Operational and Financial Flexibility. We periodically dispose of apartment communities that no longer meet our strategic objectives, but market conditions could change and purchasers may not be willing to pay prices acceptable to us. A weak market may limit our ability to change our portfolio promptly in response to changing economic conditions. Furthermore, a significant portion of the proceeds from our overall property sales may be held by intermediaries in order for some sales to qualify as like-kind exchanges under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code, so that any related capital gain can be deferred for federal income tax purposes. As a result, we may not have immediate access to all of the cash flow generated from our property sales. In addition, federal tax laws limit our ability to profit on the sale of communities that we have owned for fewer than four years, and this limitation may prevent us from selling communities when market conditions are favorable.

Increased Competition Could Limit Our Ability to Lease Apartment Homes or Increase or Maintain Rents. Our apartment communities compete with numerous housing alternatives in attracting residents, including other apartment communities and single-family rental homes, as well as owner occupied single- and multi-family homes. Competitive housing in a particular area could adversely affect our ability to lease apartment homes and increase or maintain rents.

Insufficient Cash Flow Could Affect Our Debt Financing and Create Refinancing Risk. We are subject to the risks normally associated with debt financing, including the risk that our operating income and cash flow will be insufficient to make required payments of principal and interest, or could restrict our borrowing capacity under our line of credit due to debt covenant restraints. Sufficient cash flow may not be available to make all required principal payments and still satisfy our distribution requirements to maintain our status as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, and the full limits of our line of credit may not be available to us if our operating performance falls outside the constraints of our debt covenants. Additionally, we are likely to need to refinance substantially all of our outstanding debt as it matures. We may not be able to refinance existing debt, or the terms of any refinancing may not be as favorable as the terms of the existing debt, which could create pressures to sell assets or to issue additional equity when we would otherwise not choose to do so.

Failure to Generate Sufficient Revenue Could Impair Debt Service Payments and Distributions to Stockholders. If our apartment communities do not generate sufficient net rental income to meet rental expenses, our ability to make required payments of interest and principal on our debt securities and to pay distributions to our stockholders will be adversely affected. The following factors, among others, may affect the net rental income generated by our apartment communities:

• the national and local economies,
• local real estate market conditions, such as an oversupply of apartment homes,
• tenants’ perceptions of the safety, convenience, and attractiveness of our
communities and the neighborhoods where they are located,
• our ability to provide adequate management, maintenance and insurance, and
• rental expenses, including real estate taxes and utilities.

Expenses associated with our investment in a community, such as debt service, real estate taxes, insurance and maintenance costs, are generally not reduced when circumstances cause a reduction in rental income from that

12

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

community. If a community is mortgaged to secure payment of debt and we are unable to make the mortgage payments, we could sustain a loss as a result of foreclosure on the community or the exercise of other remedies by the mortgage holder.

Debt Level May Be Increased. Our current debt policy does not contain any limitations on the level of debt that we may incur, although our ability to incur debt is limited by covenants in our bank and other credit agreements. We manage our debt to be in compliance with these debt covenants, but subject to compliance with these covenants, we may increase the amount of our debt at any time without a concurrent improvement in our ability to service the additional debt.

Financing May Not Be Available and Could be Dilutive. Our ability to execute our business strategy depends on our access to an appropriate blend of debt financing, including unsecured lines of credit and other forms of secured and unsecured debt, and equity financing, including common and preferred equity. Debt or equity financing may not be available in sufficient amounts, or on favorable terms or at all. If we issue additional equity securities to finance developments and acquisitions instead of incurring debt, the interests of our existing stockholders could be diluted.

Development and Construction Risks Could Impact Our Profitability. We intend to continue to develop and construct apartment communities. Development activities may be conducted through wholly owned affiliated companies or through joint ventures with unaffiliated parties. Our development and construction activities may be exposed to the following risks:

| • | we may be unable to obtain, or face delays in obtaining, necessary zoning,
land-use, building, occupancy and other required governmental permits and
authorizations, which could result in increased development costs and could require us
to abandon our activities entirely with respect to a project for which we are unable to
obtain permits or authorizations, |
| --- | --- |
| • | if we are unable to find joint venture partners to help fund the
development of a community or otherwise obtain acceptable financing for the
developments, our development capacity may be limited, |
| • | we may abandon development opportunities that we have already begun to
explore, and we may fail to recover expenses already incurred in connection with
exploring such opportunities, |
| • | we may be unable to complete construction and lease-up of a community on
schedule, or incur development or construction costs that exceed our original
estimates, and we may be unable to charge rents that would compensate for any increase
in such costs, |
| • | occupancy rates and rents at a newly developed community may fluctuate
depending on a number of factors, including market and economic conditions, preventing
us from meeting our profitability goals for that community, and |
| • | when we sell to third parties homes or properties that we developed or
renovated, we may be subject to warranty or construction defect claims that are
uninsured or exceed the limits of our insurance. |

Construction costs have been increasing in our existing markets, and the costs of upgrading acquired communities have, in some cases, exceeded our original estimates. We may experience similar cost increases in the future. Our inability to charge rents that will be sufficient to offset the effects of any increases in these costs may impair our profitability.

Failure to Succeed in New Markets May Limit Our Growth. We may from time to time make acquisitions outside of our existing market areas if appropriate opportunities arise. We may be exposed to a variety of risks if we choose to enter new markets, and we may not be able to operate successfully in new markets. These risks include, among others:

• inability to accurately evaluate local apartment market conditions and local economies,

13

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

• inability to obtain land for development or to identify appropriate acquisition opportunities,
• inability to hire and retain key personnel, and
• lack of familiarity with local governmental and permitting procedures.

Changing Interest Rates Could Increase Interest Costs and Adversely Affect Our Cash Flow and the Market Price of Our Securities. We currently have, and expect to incur in the future, interest-bearing debt at rates that vary with market interest rates. As of December 31, 2005, we had approximately $578 million of variable rate indebtedness outstanding, which constitutes approximately 18% of our total outstanding indebtedness as of such date. An increase in interest rates would increase our interest expenses to the extent our variable rate debt is not hedged effectively, and it would increase the costs of refinancing existing indebtedness and of issuing new debt. Accordingly, higher interest rates could adversely affect cash flow and our ability to service our debt and to make distributions to security holders. In addition, an increase in market interest rates may lead our security holders to demand a higher annual yield, which could adversely affect the market price of our common and preferred stock and debt securities.

Limited Investment Opportunities Could Adversely Affect Our Growth . We expect that other real estate investors will compete with us to acquire existing properties and to develop new properties. These competitors include insurance companies, pension and investment funds, developer partnerships, investment companies and other apartment REITs. This competition could increase prices for properties of the type that we would likely pursue, and our competitors may have greater resources than we do. As a result, we may not be able to make attractive investments on favorable terms, which could adversely affect our growth.

Failure to Integrate Acquired Communities and New Personnel Could Create Inefficiencies. To grow successfully, we must be able to apply our experience in managing our existing portfolio of apartment communities to a larger number of properties. In addition, we must be able to integrate new management and operations personnel as our organization grows in size and complexity. Failures in either area will result in inefficiencies that could adversely affect our expected return on our investments and our overall profitability.

Interest Rate Hedging Contracts May Be Ineffective and May Result in Material Charges. From time to time when we anticipate issuing debt securities, we may seek to limit our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates during the period prior to the pricing of the securities by entering into interest rate hedging contracts. We may do this to increase the predictability of our financing costs. Also, from time to time we may rely on interest rate hedging contracts to limit our exposure under variable rate debt to unfavorable changes in market interest rates. If the terms of new debt securities are not within the parameters of, or market interest rates fall below that which we incur under a particular interest rate hedging contract, the contract is ineffective. Furthermore, the settlement of interest rate hedging contracts has involved and may in the future involve material charges.

Potential Liability for Environmental Contamination Could Result in Substantial Costs. Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, as a current or former owner or operator of real estate, we could be required to investigate and remediate the effects of contamination of currently or formerly owned real estate by hazardous or toxic substances, often regardless of our knowledge of or responsibility for the contamination and solely by virtue of our current or former ownership or operation of the real estate. In addition, we could be held liable to a governmental authority or to third parties for property damage and for investigation and clean-up costs incurred in connection with the contamination. These costs could be substantial, and in many cases environmental laws create liens in favor of governmental authorities to secure their payment. The presence of such substances or a failure to properly remediate any resulting contamination could materially and adversely affect our ability to borrow against, sell or rent an affected property.

We Would Incur Adverse Tax Consequences if We Fail to Qualify as a REIT. We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code. Our qualification as a REIT requires us to satisfy numerous requirements, some on an annual and quarterly basis, established under highly technical and complex Internal Revenue Code provisions for which there are only limited judicial or administrative interpretations, and involves the determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within our control. We intend that our current organization and method of operation enable us to continue to qualify as a REIT, but we may not so qualify or we may not be able to remain so qualified in the future. In addition, U.S. federal income tax laws governing REITs and other corporations and the administrative interpretations of those laws may be amended at any time, potentially with retroactive effect. Future legislation, new regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions could adversely affect our ability to qualify as a REIT or adversely affect our stockholders.

14

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we would be subject to federal income tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on our taxable income at regular corporate rates, and would not be allowed to deduct dividends paid to our stockholders in computing our taxable income. Also, unless the Internal Revenue Service granted us relief under certain statutory provisions, we would be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year in which we first failed to qualify. The additional tax liability from the failure to qualify as a REIT would reduce or eliminate the amount of cash available for investment or distribution to our stockholders. This would likely have a significant adverse effect on the value of our securities and our ability to raise additional capital. In addition, we would no longer be required to make distributions to our stockholders. Even if we continue to qualify as a REIT, we will continue to be subject to certain federal, state and local taxes on our income and property.

We May Conduct a Portion of Our Business Through Taxable REIT Subsidiaries, Which are Subject to Certain Tax Risks. We have established several taxable REIT subsidiaries. Despite our qualification as a REIT, our taxable REIT subsidiaries must pay income tax on their taxable income. In addition, we must comply with various tests to continue to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, and our income from and investments in our taxable REIT subsidiaries generally do not constitute permissible income and investments for these tests. While we will attempt to ensure that our dealings with our taxable REIT subsidiaries will not adversely affect our REIT qualification, we cannot provide assurance that we will successfully achieve that result. Furthermore, we may be subject to a 100% penalty tax, we may jeopardize our ability to retain future gains on real property sales, or our taxable REIT subsidiaries may be denied deductions, to the extent our dealings with our taxable REIT subsidiaries are not deemed to be arm’s length in nature or are otherwise not respected.

Certain Property Transfers May Generate Prohibited Transaction Income, Resulting in a Penalty Tax on Gain Attributable to the Transaction. From time to time, we may transfer or otherwise dispose of some of our properties. Under the Internal Revenue Code, any gain resulting from transfers of properties that we hold as inventory or primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business would be treated as income from a prohibited transaction subject to a 100% penalty tax. Since we acquire properties for investment purposes, we do not believe that our occasional transfers or disposals of property are prohibited transactions. However, whether property is held for investment purposes is a question of fact that depends on all the facts and circumstances surrounding the particular transaction. The Internal Revenue Service may contend that certain transfers or disposals of properties by us are prohibited transactions. If the Internal Revenue Service were to argue successfully that a transfer or disposition of property constituted a prohibited transaction, then we would be required to pay a 100% penalty tax on any gain allocable to us from the prohibited transaction and we may jeopardize our ability to retain future gains on real property sales. In addition, income from a prohibited transaction might adversely affect our ability to satisfy the income tests for qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.

Maryland Law May Limit the Ability of a Third Party to Acquire Control of Us, Which May Not be in Our Stockholders’ Best Interests. Maryland business statutes may limit the ability of a third party to acquire control of us. As a Maryland corporation, we are subject to various Maryland laws which may have the effect of discouraging offers to acquire our company and of increasing the difficulty of consummating any such offers, even if our acquisition would be in our stockholders’ best interests. The Maryland General Corporation Law restricts mergers and other business combination transactions between us and any person who acquires beneficial ownership of shares of our stock representing 10% or more of the voting power without our board of directors’ prior approval. Any such business combination transaction could not be completed until five years after the person acquired such voting power, and generally only with the approval of stockholders representing 80% of all votes entitled to be cast and 66 2/3% of the votes entitled to be cast, excluding the interested stockholder, or upon payment of a fair price. Maryland law also provides generally that a person who acquires shares of our equity stock that represents 10% (and certain higher levels) of the voting power in electing directors will have no voting rights unless approved by a vote of two-thirds of the shares eligible to vote.

Limitations on Share Ownership and Limitations on the Ability of Our Stockholders to Effect a Change in Control of Our Company May Prevent Takeovers That are Beneficial to Our Stockholders. One of the requirements for maintenance of our qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes is that no more than 50% in value of our outstanding capital stock may be owned by five or fewer individuals, including entities specified in the Internal Revenue Code, during the last half of any taxable year. Our charter contains ownership and transfer restrictions relating to our stock primarily to assist us in complying with this requirement. These restrictions include a provision that generally limits a person from beneficially owning or constructively owning shares of our outstanding equity stock in excess of a 9.9% ownership interest, unless our board of directors exempts the person from such ownership limitation, provided that any such exemption shall not allow the person to exceed 13% of the value of our

15

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

outstanding equity stock. These provisions may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing someone from taking control of us, even though a change of control might involve a premium price for our stockholders or might otherwise be in our stockholders’ best interests.

Under the terms of our shareholder rights plan, our board of directors can, in effect, prevent a person or group from acquiring more than 15% of the outstanding shares of our common stock. Unless our board of directors approves the person’s purchase, after that person acquires more than 15% of our outstanding common stock, all other stockholders will have the right to purchase securities from us at a price that is less than their then fair market value. Purchases by other stockholders would substantially reduce the value and influence of the shares of our common stock owned by the acquiring person. Our board of directors, however, can prevent the shareholder rights plan from operating in this manner. This gives our board of directors significant discretion to approve or disapprove a person’s efforts to acquire a large interest in us.

Item 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

16

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Item 2. PROPERTIES

At December 31, 2005, our apartment portfolio included 259 communities located in 43 markets, with a total of 74,875 completed apartment homes. In addition, we had five apartment communities under development. We own approximately 53,000 square feet of office space in Richmond, Virginia, for our corporate offices and we lease approximately 11,000 square feet of office space in Highlands Ranch, Colorado, for our principal executive offices. The table below sets forth a summary of our real estate portfolio by geographic market at December 31, 2005.

SUMMARY OF REAL ESTATE PORTFOLIO BY GEOGRAPHIC MARKET AT DECEMBER 31, 2005

Total
Collections Income Average
Number of Number of Percentage of Carrying per per Home Size
Apartment Apartment Carrying Value Encumbrances Cost Per Physical Occupied Occupied (Square
Communities Homes Value (in thousands) (in thousands) Home Occupancy Home (a) Home (b) Feet)
MID-ATLANTIC REGION
Metropolitan DC 8 2,487 4.6 % $ 253,914 $ 30,691 $ 102,097 93.0 % $ 1,052 $ 1,168 925
Raleigh, NC 11 3,663 4.0 % 218,931 63,752 59,768 93.6 % 644 671 957
Baltimore, MD 10 2,118 3.1 % 169,951 13,286 80,241 96.3 % 959 994 925
Richmond, VA 9 2,636 2.8 % 156,903 61,532 59,523 93.5 % 835 821 1,109
Greensboro, NC 8 2,123 2.0 % 110,713 — 52,149 92.7 % 581 603 981
Charlotte, NC 7 1,686 2.0 % 110,229 — 65,379 94.5 % 655 685 1,024
Wilmington, NC 6 1,868 1.8 % 98,512 — 52,737 96.3 % 691 716 952
Norfolk, VA 6 1,438 1.3 % 68,968 9,117 47,961 95.3 % 823 866 1,016
Other North Carolina 8 1,893 1.5 % 81,159 13,320 42,873 93.9 % 620 648 895
Other Mid-Atlantic 6 1,156 1.1 % 61,200 16,770 52,941 94.9 % 839 876 922
Other Virginia 3 820 0.9 % 48,888 19,462 59,620 93.6 % 975 1,004 942
WESTERN REGION
Southern California 26 7,018 19.3 % 1,062,700 230,292 151,425 93.7 % 1,194 1,262 840
Northern California 10 2,689 6.5 % 356,640 67,354 132,629 94.5 % 957 1,220 798
Seattle, WA 8 1,984 3.0 % 167,657 68,452 84,505 93.4 % 719 823 905
Monterey Peninsula, CA 7 1,568 2.6 % 140,507 — 89,609 91.8 % 915 931 724
Portland, OR 6 1,422 1.6 % 89,099 17,790 62,658 93.7 % 693 691 882
SOUTHEASTERN REGION
Tampa, FL 12 4,306 4.7 % 259,936 61,749 60,366 93.7 % 796 844 978
Orlando, FL 14 4,140 4.2 % 230,968 69,311 55,789 95.8 % 767 792 937
Nashville, TN 9 2,580 2.8 % 156,721 28,976 60,745 95.0 % 695 722 950
Jacksonville, FL 4 1,557 1.9 % 103,277 — 66,331 95.2 % 658 786 913
Atlanta, GA 6 1,426 1.4 % 78,116 18,558 54,780 92.8 % 622 668 908
Columbia, SC 6 1,584 1.2 % 67,911 — 42,873 95.3 % 611 641 838
Other Florida 6 1,737 2.2 % 118,984 44,873 68,500 96.3 % 835 884 944
Other Southeastern 2 798 0.8 % 41,610 — 52,143 94.9 % 512 527 811
SOUTHWESTERN REGION
Houston, TX 16 5,447 4.6 % 253,408 39,604 46,522 93.7 % 624 650 811
Phoenix, AZ 6 1,567 2.0 % 108,881 37,081 69,484 89.3 % 775 789 972
Arlington, TX 7 2,156 1.9 % 104,796 18,375 48,607 94.5 % 614 646 794
Denver, CO 3 1,484 1.8 % 100,142 — 67,481 91.5 % 637 674 938
Dallas, TX 4 1,383 1.7 % 96,208 51,971 69,565 96.2 % 761 787 900
Austin, TX 5 1,425 1.5 % 83,484 6,073 58,585 95.7 % 653 678 805
Other Southwestern 10 3,676 3.6 % 200,980 53,558 54,674 94.9 % 647 679 842
MIDWESTERN REGION
Columbus, OH 6 2,530 2.9 % 160,093 39,278 63,278 92.6 % 675 709 904
Other Midwestern 3 444 0.4 % 23,980 5,985 54,009 92.9 % 694 736 955
Real Estate Under Development 1 66 1.8 % 96,717 25,325 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Land n/a n/a 0.4 % 24,774 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Total Apartments (c) 259 74,875 99.9 % $ 5,506,957 $ 1,112,535 $ 73,549 94.1 % $ 777 $ 820 903
Commercial Property n/a n/a 0.1 % 3,255 — n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Richmond — Corporate n/a n/a 0.0 % 2,212 3,724 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Total Real Estate Owned 259 74,875 100.0 % $ 5,512,424 $ 1,116,259 $ 73,549 94.1 % $ 777 $ 820 903
(a) Collections per Occupied Home represents net rental and fee income, excluding utility reimbursements, per weighted average number of homes occupied.
(b) Total Income per Occupied Home represents total revenues per weighted average number of homes occupied.
(c) Includes real estate held for disposition, real estate under development, and land, but excludes commercial property.

17

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are subject to various legal proceedings and claims arising in the ordinary course of business. We cannot determine the ultimate liability with respect to such legal proceedings and claims at this time. We believe that such liability, to the extent not provided for through insurance or otherwise, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flow.

Item 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

No matters were submitted to a vote of our security holders during the fourth quarter of the year ended December 31, 2005.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Common Stock

Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “UDR.” The following tables set forth the quarterly high and low sale prices per common share reported on the NYSE for each quarter of the last two fiscal years. Distribution information for common stock reflects distributions declared per share for each calendar quarter and paid at the end of the following month.

High Low Distributions Declared
2005
1st Quarter $ 24.75 $ 20.55 $ .3000
2nd Quarter 24.15 20.57 .3000
3rd Quarter 25.97 22.70 .3000
4th Quarter 23.97 20.88 .3000
2004
1st Quarter $ 19.70 $ 17.85 $ .2925
2nd Quarter 19.99 17.10 .2925
3rd Quarter 21.38 18.83 .2925
4th Quarter 24.80 19.51 .2925

On February 24, 2006, the closing sale price of our common stock was $26.86 per share on the NYSE and there were 6,328 holders of record of the 134,286,524 outstanding shares of our common stock.

We have determined that, for federal income tax purposes, approximately 53% of the distributions for each of the four quarters of 2005 represented ordinary income, 18% represented long-term capital gain, 11% represented unrecaptured section 1250 gain, and 18% represented return of capital to our stockholders.

We pay regular quarterly distributions to holders of shares of our common stock. Future distributions will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on our actual funds from operations, financial condition and capital requirements, the annual distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, and other factors. The annual distribution payment for calendar year 2005 necessary for us to maintain our status as a REIT was approximately $0.57 per share. We declared total distributions of $1.20 per share of common stock for 2005.

Series E Preferred Stock

The Series E Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock has no stated par value and a liquidation preference of $16.61 per share. Subject to certain adjustments and conditions, each share of the Series E is convertible at any time and from time to time at the holder’s option into one share of our common stock. The holders of the Series E are entitled to vote on an as-converted basis as a single class in combination with the holders of common stock at any

18

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

meeting of our stockholders for the election of directors or for any other purpose on which the holders of common stock are entitled to vote. The Series E has no stated maturity and is not subject to any sinking fund or any mandatory redemption.

Distributions declared on the Series E in 2005 were $1.33 per share or $0.3322 per quarter. The Series E is not listed on any exchange. At December 31, 2005 a total of 2,803,812 shares of the Series E were outstanding.

Series F Preferred Stock

We are authorized to issue up to 20,000,000 shares of our Series F Preferred Stock. Our Series F Preferred Stock may be purchased by holders of our operating partnership units, or OP Units, described below under “Operating Partnership Units,” at a purchase price of $0.0001 per share. OP Unitholders are entitled to subscribe for and purchase one share of our Series F Preferred Stock for each OP Unit held. As of February 24, 2006, we have not issued any shares of our Series F Preferred Stock. If we issue shares of our Series F Preferred Stock, the holders thereof will be entitled to one vote for each share of the Series F Preferred Stock they hold, voting together with the holders of our common stock, on each matter submitted to a vote of securityholders at a meeting of our stockholders. The Series F Preferred Stock does not entitle its holders to any other rights, privileges or preferences.

Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan

We have a Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan under which holders of our common stock and our Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock may elect to automatically reinvest their distributions and make additional cash payments to acquire additional shares of our common stock. Stockholders who do not participate in the plan continue to receive dividends as declared. As of February 24, 2006, there were 3,547 participants in the plan.

Operating Partnership Units

From time to time we issue shares of our common stock in exchange for OP Units tendered to our operating partnerships, United Dominion Realty, L.P. and Heritage Communities L.P., for redemption in accordance with the provisions of their respective partnership agreements. At December 31, 2005, there were 10,177,792 OP Units (of which 1,764,662 are owned by the holders of the Series A OPPS (see Note 1 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements)) and 338,628 OP Units in United Dominion Realty, L.P. and Heritage Communities L.P., respectively, that were owned by limited partners. The holder of the OP Units has the right to require United Dominion Realty, L.P. to redeem all or a portion of the OP Units held by the holder in exchange for a cash payment based on the market value of our common stock at the time of redemption. However, United Dominion Realty, L.P.’s obligation to pay the cash amount is subject to the prior right of the company to acquire such OP Units in exchange for either the cash amount or shares of our common stock. Heritage Communities L.P. OP Units are convertible into common stock in lieu of cash, at our option, once the holder elects to convert, at an exchange ratio of 1.575 shares for each OP Unit. During 2005, we issued a total of 99,573 shares of common stock in exchange for OP Units.

19

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Purchases of Equity Securities

On June 3, 1999, our board of directors authorized the repurchase in open market transactions, in block transactions, or otherwise, of up to 5.5 million shares of common stock. On December 5, 2000, our board of directors authorized the purchase of up to an additional 5.5 million shares of common stock in open market transactions, in block purchases or otherwise. As of December 31, 2005, we have repurchased a total of 9,526,263 shares of common stock under this program. We repurchased a total of 1,069,500 shares of our common stock under this program during the quarter ended December 31, 2005. In addition, we repurchased 2,110,850 shares of our common stock in December 2005 at an average purchase price per share of $23.51 in connection with our offering of $250 million aggregate principal amount of our 4.00% convertible senior notes due 2035. We will not repurchase any additional shares of common stock in connection with the notes offering. Information regarding the offering of our 4.00% convertible senior notes due 2035 and the repurchase of our common stock in connection with the offering is set forth in our Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 13, 2005, and filed with the SEC on December 19, 2005, and our Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the SEC on December 23, 2005.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding our common stock repurchases during the quarter ended December 31, 2005:

Total Number Average Total Number of Shares — Purchased as Part of Maximum Number of — Shares that May Yet Be
of Shares Price Per Publicly Announced Purchased Under the
Period Purchased Share Plans or Programs Plans or Programs
October 1, 2005 through October 31, 2005 398,500 $ 21.58 398,500 1,851,737
November 1, 2005 through November 30, 2005 378,000 $ 21.72 378,000 1,473,737
December 1, 2005 through December 31, 2005 2,403,850 $ 23.48 2,403,850 1,180,737 *
Total 3,180,350 $ 23.03 3,180,350
  • This number reflects the number of shares that were available for purchase under our repurchase program on December 31, 2005. On February 10, 2006, our board of directors authorized a repurchase program pursuant to which we may repurchase up to a total of 10,000,000 shares of our common stock in open market purchases, block purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. This repurchase program replaces our previous repurchase program discussed above.

20

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Item 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following table sets forth selected consolidated financial and other information as of and for each of the years in the five-year period ended December 31, 2005. The table should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, and Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, included elsewhere in this Report.

Years ended December 31, — 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001
(in thousands, except per share data and apartment homes owned)
Operating Data (a)
Rental income $ 680,553 $ 572,408 $ 509,555 $ 487,129 $ 453,215
Income/(loss) before minority interests and discontinued
operations 18,590 24,548 23,305 (15,289 ) 1,773
Income from discontinued operations, net of minority interests 136,864 72,731 46,216 67,214 59,904
Net income 155,166 97,152 70,404 53,229 61,828
Distributions to preferred stockholders 15,370 19,531 26,326 27,424 31,190
Net income available to common stockholders 139,796 71,892 24,807 25,805 27,142
Common distributions declared 163,690 152,203 134,876 118,888 108,956
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding — basic 136,143 128,097 114,672 106,078 100,339
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding — diluted 137,013 128,097 114,672 106,078 100,339
Weighted average number of common shares, OP Units, and common
stock equivalents outstanding — diluted 150,141 145,842 136,975 127,838 120,728
Per share — basic:
Income/(loss) from continuing operations available to common
stockholders, net of minority interests $ 0.02 $ (0.01 ) $ (0.18 ) $ (0.39 ) $ (0.33 )
Income from discontinued operations, net of minority interests 1.01 0.57 0.40 0.63 0.60
Net income available to common stockholders 1.03 0.56 0.22 0.24 0.27
Per
share — diluted:
Income/(loss)
from continuing operations available to common stockholders, net of
minority interests $ 0.02 $ (0.01 ) $ (0.18 ) $ (0.39 ) $ (0.33 )
Income from
discontinued operations, net of minority interests 1.00 0.57 0.40 0.63 0.60
Net income
available to common stockholders 1.02 0.56 0.22 0.24 0.27
Common distributions declared 1.20 1.17 1.14 1.11 1.08
Balance Sheet Data
Real estate owned, at carrying value $ 5,512,424 $ 5,243,296 $ 4,351,551 $ 3,967,483 $ 3,907,667
Accumulated depreciation 1,123,829 1,007,887 896,630 748,733 646,366
Total real estate owned, net of accumulated depreciation 4,388,595 4,235,409 3,454,921 3,218,750 3,261,301
Total assets 4,541,593 4,332,001 3,543,643 3,276,136 3,348,091
Secured debt 1,116,259 1,197,924 1,018,028 1,015,740 974,177
Unsecured debt 2,043,518 1,682,058 1,114,009 1,041,900 1,090,020
Total debt 3,159,777 2,879,982 2,132,037 2,057,640 2,064,197
Stockholders’ equity 1,107,724 1,195,451 1,163,436 1,001,271 1,042,725
Number of common shares outstanding 134,012 136,430 127,295 106,605 103,133
Other Data
Cash Flow Data
Cash provided by operating activities $ 248,186 $ 251,747 $ 234,945 $ 229,001 $ 224,411
Cash used in investing activities (219,017 ) (595,966 ) (304,217 ) (67,363 ) (64,055 )
Cash (used in)/provided by financing activities (21,530 ) 347,299 70,944 (163,127 ) (166,020 )
Funds from Operations (b)
Funds from operations — basic $ 238,254 $ 211,670 $ 193,750 $ 153,016 $ 159,202
Funds from operations — diluted 241,980 219,557 208,431 168,795 174,630
Apartment Homes Owned
Total apartment homes owned at December 31 74,875 78,855 76,244 74,480 77,567
Weighted average number of apartment homes owned during the
year 76,069 76,873 74,550 76,567 76,487

| (a) | Reclassified to conform to current year presentation in accordance with FASB Statement No. 144, “ Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets,” as described in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements. |
| --- | --- |
| (b) | Funds from operations, or FFO, is defined as net income (computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles), excluding gains (or losses)
from sales of depreciable property, plus depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. This
definition conforms with the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trust’s definition issued in April 2002. We consider FFO in evaluating property
acquisitions and our operating performance and believe that FFO should be considered along with, but not as an alternative to, net income and cash flows as a
measure of our activities in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and is not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash needs. For 2005, FFO includes $2.5
million of hurricane related insurance recoveries. For 2004, FFO includes a charge of $5.5 million to cover hurricane related expenses. For 2001, FFO
includes a charge of $8.6 million related to workforce reductions, other severance costs, executive office relocation costs, and the write down of seven
undeveloped land sites along with our investment in an online apartment leasing company. For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, distributions to
preferred stockholders exclude $5.7 million and $19.3 million, respectively, related to premiums on preferred stock conversions. |

21

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Forward-Looking Statements

This Report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements concerning property acquisitions and dispositions, development activity and capital expenditures, capital raising activities, rent growth, occupancy, and rental expense growth. Words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of United Dominion Realty Trust, Inc. to be materially different from the results of operations or plans expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among other things, unanticipated adverse business developments affecting us, or our properties, adverse changes in the real estate markets and general and local economies and business conditions. Although we believe that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements contained herein are reasonable, any of the assumptions could be inaccurate, and therefore such statements included in this Report may not prove to be accurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included herein, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that the results or conditions described in such statements or our objectives and plans will be achieved.

Business Overview

We are a real estate investment trust, or REIT, that owns, acquires, renovates, develops, and manages apartment communities nationwide. We were formed in 1972 as a Virginia corporation. In June 2003, we changed our state of incorporation from Virginia to Maryland. Our subsidiaries include two operating partnerships, Heritage Communities L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, and United Dominion Realty, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership. Unless the context otherwise requires, all references in this Report to “we,” “us,” “our,” “the company,” or “United Dominion” refer collectively to United Dominion Realty Trust, Inc. and its subsidiaries.

22

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

At December 31, 2005, our portfolio included 259 communities with 74,875 apartment homes nationwide. The following table summarizes our market information by major geographic markets (includes real estate held for disposition, real estate under development, and land, but excludes commercial properties):

Year Ended
As of December 31, 2005 December 31, 2005
Number of Number of Percentage of Carrying Average Total
Apartment Apartment Carrying Value Physical Income per
Communities Homes Value (in thousands) Occupancy Occupied Home (a)
MID-ATLANTIC REGION
Metropolitan DC 8 2,487 4.6 % $ 253,914 93.0 % $ 1,168
Raleigh, NC 11 3,663 4.0 % 218,931 93.6 % 671
Baltimore, MD 10 2,118 3.1 % 169,951 96.3 % 994
Richmond, VA 9 2,636 2.8 % 156,903 93.5 % 821
Greensboro, NC 8 2,123 2.0 % 110,713 92.7 % 603
Charlotte, NC 7 1,686 2.0 % 110,229 94.5 % 685
Wilmington, NC 6 1,868 1.8 % 98,512 96.3 % 716
Norfolk, VA 6 1,438 1.3 % 68,968 95.3 % 866
Other North Carolina 8 1,893 1.5 % 81,159 93.9 % 648
Other Mid-Atlantic 6 1,156 1.1 % 61,200 94.9 % 876
Other Virginia 3 820 0.9 % 48,888 93.6 % 1,004
WESTERN REGION
Southern California 26 7,018 19.3 % 1,062,700 93.7 % 1,262
Northern California 10 2,689 6.5 % 356,640 94.5 % 1,220
Seattle, WA 8 1,984 3.0 % 167,657 93.4 % 823
Monterey Peninsula, CA 7 1,568 2.7 % 140,507 91.8 % 931
Portland, OR 6 1,422 1.6 % 89,099 93.7 % 691
SOUTHEASTERN REGION
Tampa, FL 12 4,306 4.7 % 259,936 93.7 % 844
Orlando, FL 14 4,140 4.2 % 230,968 95.8 % 792
Nashville, TN 9 2,580 2.8 % 156,721 95.0 % 722
Jacksonville, FL 4 1,557 1.9 % 103,277 95.2 % 786
Atlanta, GA 6 1,426 1.4 % 78,116 92.8 % 668
Columbia, SC 6 1,584 1.2 % 67,911 95.3 % 641
Other Florida 6 1,737 2.2 % 118,984 96.3 % 884
Other Southeastern 2 798 0.8 % 41,610 94.9 % 527
SOUTHWESTERN REGION
Houston, TX 16 5,447 4.6 % 253,408 93.7 % 650
Phoenix, AZ 6 1,567 2.0 % 108,881 89.3 % 789
Arlington, TX 7 2,156 1.9 % 104,796 94.5 % 646
Denver, CO 3 1,484 1.8 % 100,142 91.5 % 674
Dallas, TX 4 1,383 1.7 % 96,208 96.2 % 787
Austin, TX 5 1,425 1.5 % 83,484 95.7 % 678
Other Southwestern 10 3,676 3.6 % 200,980 94.9 % 679
MIDWESTERN REGION
Columbus, OH 6 2,530 2.9 % 160,093 92.6 % 709
Other Midwestern 3 444 0.4 % 23,980 92.9 % 736
Real Estate Under Development 1 66 1.8 % 96,717 — —
Land — — 0.4 % 24,774 — —
Total 259 74,875 100.0 % $ 5,506,957 94.1 % $ 820

(a) Total Income per Occupied Home represents total revenues per weighted average number of apartment homes occupied.

23

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity is the ability to meet present and future financial obligations either through operating cash flows, the sale or maturity of existing assets, or by the acquisition of additional funds through capital management. Both the coordination of asset and liability maturities and effective capital management are important to the maintenance of liquidity. Our primary source of liquidity is our cash flow from operations as determined by rental rates, occupancy levels, and operating expenses related to our portfolio of apartment homes. We routinely use our unsecured bank credit facility to temporarily fund certain investing and financing activities prior to arranging for longer-term financing. During the past several years, proceeds from the sale of real estate have been used for both investing and financing activities.

We expect to meet our short-term liquidity requirements generally through net cash provided by operations and borrowings under credit arrangements. We expect to meet certain long-term liquidity requirements such as scheduled debt maturities, the repayment of financing on development activities, and potential property acquisitions, through long-term secured and unsecured borrowings, the disposition of properties, and the issuance of additional debt or equity securities. We believe that our net cash provided by operations will continue to be adequate to meet both operating requirements and the payment of dividends by the company in accordance with REIT requirements in both the short- and long-term. Likewise, the budgeted expenditures for improvements and renovations of certain properties are expected to be funded from property operations.

We have a shelf registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission which provides for the issuance of an indeterminate amount of common stock, preferred stock, debt securities, warrants, purchase contracts and units to facilitate future financing activities in the public capital markets. This shelf registration statement replaces our previous $1.5 billion shelf registration statement. In 2005, we completed various financing activities under our previous $1.5 billion shelf registration statement. These activities are summarized in the section titled “Financing Activities” that follows. Access to capital markets is dependent on market conditions at the time of issuance.

Future Capital Needs

Future development expenditures are expected to be funded with proceeds from the sale of property, with construction loans, through joint ventures and, to a lesser extent, with cash flows provided by operating activities. Acquisition activity in strategic markets is expected to be largely financed through the issuance of equity and debt securities, the issuance of operating partnership units, the assumption or placement of secured and/or unsecured debt, and by the reinvestment of proceeds from the sale of properties.

During 2006, we have approximately $36.6 million of secured debt and $135.2 million of unsecured debt maturing and we anticipate repaying that debt with proceeds from borrowings under our secured or unsecured credit facilities, the issuance of new unsecured debt securities or equity, or from disposition proceeds.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our critical accounting policies are those having the most impact on the reporting of our financial condition and results and those requiring significant judgments and estimates. These policies include those related to (1) capital expenditures, (2) impairment of long-lived assets, and (3) real estate investment properties. With respect to these critical accounting policies, we believe that the application of judgments and assessments is consistently applied and produces financial information that fairly depicts the results of operations for all periods presented.

Capital Expenditures

In conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, we capitalize those expenditures related to acquiring new assets, materially enhancing the value of an existing asset, or substantially

24

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

extending the useful life of an existing asset. Expenditures necessary to maintain an existing property in ordinary operating condition are expensed as incurred.

During 2005, $156.1 million or $2,062 per home was spent on capital expenditures for all of our communities, excluding development and commercial properties. These capital improvements included turnover related expenditures for floor coverings and appliances, other recurring capital expenditures such as HVAC equipment, roofs, siding, parking lots, and other non-revenue enhancing capital expenditures, which aggregated $38.8 million or $513 per home. In addition, revenue enhancing capital expenditures, kitchen and bath upgrades, and other extensive interior upgrades totaled $98.6 million or $1,302 per home, and major renovations totaled $18.7 million or $247 per home for the year ended December 31, 2005.

The following table outlines capital expenditures and repair and maintenance costs for all of our communities, excluding real estate under development and commercial properties for the periods presented:

Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
(dollars in thousands) (per home)
2005 2004 % Change 2005 2004 % Change
Turnover capital expenditures $ 17,916 $ 16,863 6.2 % $ 237 $ 220 7.7 %
Other recurring capital expenditures 20,928 19,191 9.1 % 276 250 10.4 %
Total recurring capital expenditures 38,844 36,054 7.7 % 513 470 9.2 %
Revenue enhancing improvements 98,592 45,933 114.6 % 1,302 599 117.4 %
Major renovations 18,686 261 7059.4 % 247 3 8133.3 %
Total capital improvements $ 156,122 $ 82,248 89.8 % $ 2,062 $ 1,072 92.4 %
Repair and maintenance 45,266 42,196 7.3 % 598 550 8.7 %
Total expenditures $ 201,388 $ 124,444 61.8 % $ 2,660 $ 1,622 64.0 %

Total capital improvements increased $73.9 million or $990 per home for the year ended December 31, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004. This increase was attributable to $18.7 million of major renovations at certain of our properties. These renovations included the re-wiring and/or re-plumbing of an entire building as well as major structural changes and/or architectural revisions to existing buildings. The increase was also attributable to an additional $52.7 million being invested in revenue enhancing improvements. We will continue to selectively add revenue enhancing improvements which we believe will provide a return on investment substantially in excess of our cost of capital. Recurring capital expenditures during 2006 are currently expected to be approximately $530 per home.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

We record impairment losses on long-lived assets used in operations when events and circumstances indicate that the assets might be impaired and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by the future operation and disposition of those assets are less than the net book value of those assets. Our cash flow estimates are based upon historical results adjusted to reflect our best estimate of future market and operating conditions and our estimated holding periods. The net book value of impaired assets is reduced to fair market value. Our estimates of fair market value represent our best estimate based upon industry trends and reference to market rates and transactions.

Real Estate Investment Properties

We purchase real estate investment properties from time to time and allocate the purchase price to various components, such as land, buildings, and intangibles related to in-place leases in accordance with FASB Statement No. 141, “Business Combinations.” The purchase price is allocated based on the relative fair value of each component. The fair value of buildings is determined as if the buildings were vacant upon acquisition and subsequently leased at market rental rates. As such, the determination of fair value considers the present value of all

25

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

cash flows expected to be generated from the property including an initial lease-up period. We determine the fair value of in-place leases by assessing the net effective rent and remaining term of the lease relative to market terms for similar leases at acquisition. In addition, we consider the cost of acquiring similar leases, the foregone rents associated with the lease-up period, and the carrying costs associated with the lease-up period. The fair value of in-place leases is recorded and amortized as amortization expense over the remaining contractual lease period.

Statements of Cash Flow

The following discussion explains the changes in net cash provided by operating activities and net cash used in investing and financing activities that are presented in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

Operating Activities

For the year ended December 31, 2005, our net cash flow provided by operating activities was $248.2 million compared to $251.7 million for 2004. During 2005, the slight decrease in cash flow from operating activities resulted primarily from a $47.2 million increase in interest expense that was primarily offset by a $9.1 million net increase in operating assets/liabilities for the period, and a $32.6 million increase in property operating results from our apartment community portfolio (see discussion under “Apartment Community Operations”).

Investing Activities

For the year ended December 31, 2005, net cash used in investing activities was $219.0 million compared to $596.0 million for 2004. Changes in the level of investing activities from period to period reflects our strategy as it relates to our acquisition, capital expenditure, development, and disposition programs, as well as the impact of the capital market environment on these activities, all of which are discussed in further detail below.

Acquisitions

For the year ended December 31, 2005, we acquired eight apartment communities with 2,561 apartment homes for an aggregate consideration of $390.9 million and one parcel of land for $2.9 million. For 2004, we acquired 28 apartment communities with 8,060 apartment homes for an aggregate consideration of $390.9 million and one parcel of land for $16.3 million. Our long-term strategic plan is to achieve greater operating efficiencies by investing in fewer, more concentrated markets. As a result, we have been expanding our interests in the fast growing Southern California, Florida, and Metropolitan Washington DC markets over the past two years. During 2006, we plan to continue to channel new investments into those markets we believe will provide the best investment returns. Markets will be targeted based upon defined criteria including past performance, expected job growth, current and anticipated housing supply and demand, and the ability to attract and support household formation.

Real Estate Under Development

Development activity is focused in core markets in which we have strong operations in place. For the year ended December 31, 2005, we invested approximately $49.3 million in development projects, an increase of $30.2 million from our 2004 level of $19.1 million.

The following projects were under development as of December 31, 2005:

Apartment Apartment Cost to — Date Budgeted — Cost Estimated — Cost Expected — Completion
Homes Homes (In thousands) (In thousands) Per Home Date
Verano at Town Square Rancho Cucamonga, CA 414 66 $ 55,653 $ 66,300 $ 160,100 1Q06
Mandalay on the Lake Irving, TX 369 — 26,339 30,900 83,700 2Q06
2000 Post
— Phase III San Francisco, CA 24 — 4,835 9,000 375,000 2Q06
Ridgeview Plano, TX 225 — 6,883 18,000 80,000 1Q07
Lincoln Towne Square — Phase II Plano, TX 303 — 3,007 21,000 69,300 3Q07
1,335 66 $ 96,717 $ 145,200 $ 108,800

In addition, we own four parcels of land that we continue to hold for future development that had a carrying value as of December 31, 2005 of $20.8 million.

26

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Disposition of Investments

For the year ended December 31, 2005, United Dominion sold 22 communities with 6,352 apartment homes and 240 condominiums from five communities with a total of 648 condominiums for a gross consideration of $456.3 million. In addition, we sold our investment in an unconsolidated joint venture for $39.2 million and one parcel of land for $0.9 million. We recognized gains for financial reporting purposes of $143.5 million on these sales. Proceeds from the sales were used primarily to reduce debt and acquire additional communities. In connection with our third quarter portfolio sale of ten communities in Texas and North Carolina, we received short-term notes of $124.7 million. These notes had maturities ranging from September 2005 to July 2006. As of December 31, 2005, the outstanding balance on these notes was $59.8 million, bearing interest at 6.75%.

For the year ended December 31, 2004, we sold 19 communities with 5,425 apartment homes for an aggregate consideration of $270.1 million. In addition, we sold 24 of 36 townhomes of a community for $7.3 million. We recognized gains for financial reporting purposes of $52.9 million on these sales. Proceeds from the sales were used primarily to reduce debt.

During 2006, we plan to continue to pursue our strategy of exiting markets where long-term growth prospects are limited and redeploying capital into markets that would enhance future growth rates and economies of scale. We intend to use the proceeds from 2006 dispositions to reduce debt, acquire communities, and fund development activity.

Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities during 2005 was $21.5 million compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $347.3 million in 2004. As part of the plan to improve our balance sheet, we utilized proceeds from dispositions, equity and debt offerings, and refinancings to extend maturities, pay down existing debt, and purchase new properties.

The following is a summary of our financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2005:

| § | Repaid $133.8 million of secured debt and $70.9 million of unsecured debt, and incurred $8.5 million in prepayment
penalties. |
| --- | --- |
| § | Sold $50 million aggregate principal amount of 5.25% senior unsecured notes due January 2015 in February 2005 under our
medium-term note program. These notes represent a re-opening of the 5.25% senior unsecured |

27

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

| | notes due January 2015 that were issued in November 2004, and these notes constitute a single series of notes. The February
2005 issuance of these notes brought the aggregate principal amount of the 5.25% senior unsecured notes to $150 million. The net
proceeds of approximately $50 million were used for debt repayment and to fund the acquisition of apartment communities. |
| --- | --- |
| § | Sold our shares in Rent.com, a leading Internet listing web site in the apartment and rental housing
industry, in February 2005. As a result, we received cash proceeds and recorded a one-time gain of $12.3
million on the sale. As part of the transaction, an additional $0.8 million was placed in escrow and will
be recorded as revenue when received. |
| § | Sold $50 million aggregate principal amount of 5.25% senior unsecured notes due January 2015 in March 2005
under our medium-term note program. These notes represent a re-opening of the 5.25% senior unsecured
notes due January 2015 that were issued in November 2004, and these notes constitute a single series of
notes. The March 2005 issuance of these notes brought the aggregate principal amount of the 5.25% senior
unsecured notes to $200 million. The net proceeds of approximately $50 million were used for debt
repayment and to fund the acquisition of apartment communities. |
| § | Sold $50 million aggregate principal amount of 5.25% senior unsecured notes due January 2015 in May 2005
under our medium-term note program. These notes represent a re-opening of the 5.25% senior unsecured
notes due January 2015 that were issued in November 2004, and these notes constitute a single series of
notes. The May 2005 issuance of these notes brought the aggregate principal amount of the 5.25% senior
unsecured notes to $250 million. The net proceeds of approximately $50 million were used for debt
repayment and to fund the acquisition of apartment communities. |
| § | Amended and restated our $500 million unsecured revolving credit facility and extended the term an
additional two years. The credit facility matures on May 31, 2008, and, at our option, can be extended
for an additional year. We have the right to increase the credit facility to $750 million if the initial
lenders increase their commitments or we receive commitments from additional lenders. Based on our
current credit ratings, the credit facility carries an interest rate equal to LIBOR plus a spread of 57.5
basis points, which represents a 12.5 basis point reduction to the previous unsecured revolver, and the
facility fee was reduced from 20 basis points to 15 basis points. Under a competitive bid feature and for
so long as we maintain an Investment Grade Rating, we have the right to bid out 100% of the commitment
amount. |
| § | Converted a $75 million variable rate debt facility to a fixed rate of 4.86% on December 1, 2005. |
| § | Sold $100 million aggregate principal amount of 5.25% medium-term notes due January 2016 in September 2005
under our medium-term note program. The net proceeds of approximately $100 million were used for debt
repayment. |
| § | Sold $250 million aggregate principal amount of our 4.00% convertible senior notes due 2035 in December
2005. We used the net proceeds of approximately $245 million to repay outstanding debt under our
unsecured revolving bank credit facility and to repurchase shares of our common stock. |
| § | Repurchased 1,069,500 shares of our common stock at an average price per share of $22.08 under our common stock
repurchase program and repurchased 2,110,850 shares of our common
stock at an average price per share of $23.51 in connection with the offering of
our 4.00% convertible senior notes due 2035. As of December 31, 2005, approximately 1.2 million shares of
common stock remained available for repurchase under the common stock repurchase program. |

Credit Facilities

We have four secured revolving credit facilities with Fannie Mae with an aggregate commitment of $860 million. As of December 31, 2005, $656.3 million was outstanding under the Fannie Mae credit facilities leaving $203.7 million of unused capacity. The Fannie Mae credit facilities are for an initial term of ten years, bear interest at floating and fixed rates, and can be extended for an additional five years at our discretion. We have $363.9 million of the funded balance fixed at a weighted average interest rate of 6.1%. The remaining balance on these facilities is currently at a weighted average variable rate of 4.7%.

28

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

We have a $500 million unsecured revolving credit facility that matures in May 2008 and, at our option, can be extended an additional year. We have the right to increase the credit facility to $750 million under certain circumstances. Based on our current credit ratings, the credit facility bears interest at a rate equal to LIBOR plus 57.5 basis points. As of December 31, 2005, $210.8 million was outstanding under the credit facility leaving $289.2 million of unused capacity.

The Fannie Mae credit facility and the bank revolving credit facility are subject to customary financial covenants and limitations.

Interest Rate Risk

We are exposed to interest rate risk associated with variable rate notes payable and maturing debt that has to be refinanced. United Dominion does not hold financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes, but rather issues these financial instruments to finance its portfolio of real estate assets. Interest rate sensitivity is the relationship between changes in market interest rates and the fair value of market rate sensitive assets and liabilities. Our earnings are affected as changes in short-term interest rates impact our cost of variable rate debt and maturing fixed rate debt. A large portion of our market risk is exposure to short-term interest rates from variable rate borrowings outstanding under our Fannie Mae credit facility and our bank revolving credit facility, which totaled $292.5 million and $210.8 million, respectively, at December 31, 2005. The impact on our financial statements of refinancing fixed rate debt that matured during 2005 was immaterial.

If market interest rates for variable rate debt average 100 basis points more in 2006 than they did during 2005, our interest expense would increase, and income before taxes would decrease by $6.0 million. Comparatively, if market interest rates for variable rate debt had averaged 100 basis points more in 2005 than in 2004, our interest expense would have increased, and net income would have decreased by $7.4 million. If market rates for fixed rate debt were 100 basis points higher at December 31, 2005, the fair value of fixed rate debt would have decreased from $2.6 billion to $2.4 billion. If market interest rates for fixed rate debt were 100 basis points lower at December 31, 2005, the fair value of fixed rate debt would have increased from $2.6 billion to $2.7 billion.

These amounts are determined by considering the impact of hypothetical interest rates on our borrowing cost. These analyses do not consider the effects of the adjusted level of overall economic activity that could exist in such an environment. Further, in the event of a change of such magnitude, management would likely take actions to further mitigate our exposure to the change. However, due to the uncertainty of the specific actions that would be taken and their possible effects, the sensitivity analysis assumes no change in our financial structure.

Funds from Operations

Funds from operations, or FFO, is defined as net income (computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of depreciable property, plus real estate depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. We compute FFO for all periods presented in accordance with the recommendations set forth by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trust’s (“NAREIT”) April 1, 2002 White Paper. We consider FFO in evaluating property acquisitions and our operating performance, and believe that FFO should be considered along with, but not as an alternative to, net income and cash flow as a measure of our activities in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and is not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash needs.

Historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values instead have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors and analysts have considered the presentation of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient by themselves. Thus, NAREIT created FFO as a supplemental measure of REIT operating performance and defines FFO as net income (computed in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of depreciable property, plus depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. The use of FFO, combined with the required presentations, has been fundamentally beneficial, improving the understanding of operating results of REITs among

29

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

the investing public and making comparisons of REIT operating results more meaningful. We generally consider FFO to be a useful measure for reviewing our comparative operating and financial performance (although FFO should be reviewed in conjunction with net income which remains the primary measure of performance) because by excluding gains or losses related to sales of previously depreciated operating real estate assets and excluding real estate asset depreciation and amortization, FFO can help one compare the operating performance of a company’s real estate between periods or as compared to different companies. We believe that FFO is the best measure of economic profitability for real estate investment trusts.

The following table outlines our FFO calculation and reconciliation to generally accepted accounting principles for the three years ended December 31, 2005 ( dollars in thousands ):

Net income 2005 — $ 155,166 $ 97,152 $ 70,404
Adjustments:
Distributions to preferred stockholders (15,370 ) (19,531 ) (26,326 )
Real estate depreciation, net of outside partners’ interest 209,856 163,176 136,578
Minority interests of unitholders in operating partnership 180 (55 ) (1,497 )
Real estate depreciation related to unconsolidated entities 311 279 196
Discontinued Operations:
Real estate depreciation 2,568 17,452 26,380
Minority interests of unitholders in operating partnership 8,550 4,898 3,144
Net gains on the sale of depreciable property (139,724 ) (52,903 ) (15,941 )
Net incremental gains on the sale of condominium homes 16,717 1,202 —
Gains on the disposition of real estate developed for sale — — 812
Funds from operations — basic $ 238,254 $ 211,670 $ 193,750
Distributions to preferred stockholders — Series D and E (Convertible) 3,726 7,887 14,681
Funds from operations — diluted $ 241,980 $ 219,557 $ 208,431
Weighted average number of common shares and OP Units outstanding — basic 144,689 136,852 122,589
Weighted average number of common shares, OP Units, and common stock
equivalents outstanding — diluted 150,141 145,842 136,975

In the computation of diluted FFO, OP Units, out-performance partnership shares, and the shares of Series D Cumulative Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock and Series E Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock are dilutive; therefore, they are included in the diluted share count. For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, distributions to preferred stockholders exclude $5.7 million and $19.3 million, respectively, related to premiums on preferred stock conversions.

Net incremental gains on the sale of condominium homes and the net incremental gain on the sale of a depreciable asset related to an unconsolidated entity are defined as net sales proceeds less a tax provision and the gross investment basis of the asset before accumulated depreciation. We consider FFO with gains/losses on the sale of condominium homes and gains/losses on the sale of depreciable assets related to an unconsolidated entity to be a meaningful supplemental measure of performance because the short-term use of funds produce a profit that differs from the traditional long-term investment in real estate for REITs.

30

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

The following table is our reconciliation of FFO share information to weighted average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted, reflected on the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three years ended December 31, 2005 ( shares in thousands ):

Weighted average number of common shares and OP units outstanding — basic 144,689 136,852 122,589
Weighted average number of OP units outstanding (8,546 ) (8,755 ) (7,917 )
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding — basic
per the Consolidated Statements of Operations 136,143 128,097 114,672
Weighted average number of common shares, OP units, and common stock
equivalents outstanding — diluted 150,141 145,842 136,975
Weighted average number of OP units outstanding (8,546 ) (8,755 ) (7,917 )
Weighted average number of incremental shares from assumed conversion of
stock options — (897 ) (976 )
Weighted average number of Series A OPPSs outstanding (1,778 ) (1,791 ) (1,773 )
Weighted average number of Series D preferred stock outstanding — (2,892 ) (10,033 )
Weighted average number of Series E preferred stock outstanding (2,804 ) (3,410 ) (1,604 )
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding — diluted
per the Consolidated Statements of Operations 137,013 128,097 114,672

FFO also does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and therefore should not be considered an alternative to net cash flows from operating activities, as determined by generally accepted accounting principles, as a measure of liquidity. Additionally, it is not necessarily indicative of cash availability to fund cash needs. A presentation of cash flow metrics based on generally accepted accounting principles is as follows ( dollars in thousands ):

Net cash provided by operating activities 2005 — $ 248,186 $ 251,747 $ 234,945
Net cash used in investing activities (219,017 ) (595,966 ) (304,217 )
Net cash (used in)/provided by financing activities (21,530 ) 347,299 70,944

Results of Operations

The following discussion includes the results of both continuing and discontinued operations for the periods presented.

Net Income Available to Common Stockholders

2005-vs.-2004

Net income available to common stockholders was $139.8 million ($1.02 per diluted share) for the year ended December 31, 2005, compared to $71.9 million ($0.56 per diluted share) for the year ended December 31, 2004, representing an increase of $67.9 million ($0.46 per diluted share). The increase for the year ended December 31, 2005, when compared to the same period in 2004, resulted primarily from the following items, all of which are discussed in further detail elsewhere within this Report:

• $90.6 million more in gains recognized from the sale of depreciable property and an unconsolidated joint venture in 2005,

• a $32.6 million increase in apartment community operating results in 2005,

• a $14.2 million increase in non-property income in 2005,

31

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

• a $5.7 million decrease in premiums paid on preferred stock conversions in 2005,
• a $5.5 million charge recorded for hurricane related expenses in 2004,
• $4.2 million less in preferred stock distributions in 2005, and
• $2.5 million in hurricane related insurance recoveries in 2005.

These increases in income were partially offset by a $38.7 million increase in interest expense, a $31.8 million increase in real estate depreciation and amortization expense, an $8.5 million increase in losses on early debt retirement, and a $5.5 million increase in general and administrative expense in 2005 when compared to 2004.

2004-vs.-2003

Net income available to common stockholders was $71.9 million ($0.56 per diluted share) for the year ended December 31, 2004, compared to $24.8 million ($0.22 per diluted share) for the year ended December 31, 2003, representing an increase of $47.1 million ($0.34 per diluted share). The increase for the year ended December 31, 2004, when compared to the same period in 2003, resulted primarily from the following items, all of which are discussed in further detail elsewhere within this Report:

• $37.0 million more in gains recognized from the sale of depreciable property in 2004,
• a $19.2 million increase in apartment community operating results in 2004,
• a $13.5 million decrease in premiums paid on preferred stock conversions in 2004,
• $6.8 million less in preferred stock distributions in 2004,
• a $1.5 million increase in non-property income in 2004,
• $1.4 million less in impairment loss on investments in 2004, and
• a $1.3 million decrease in general and administrative expense in 2004.

These increases in income were partially offset by a $17.2 million increase in depreciation and amortization expense, a $6.6 million increase in interest expense, and a charge of $5.5 million for hurricane related expenses in 2004 when compared to 2003.

Apartment Community Operations

Our net income is primarily generated from the operation of our apartment communities. The following table summarizes the operating performance of our total apartment portfolio for each of the periods presented ( dollars in thousands ):

Year Ended December 31, — 2005 2004 % Change Year Ended December 31, — 2004 2003 % Change
Property rental income $ 700,344 $ 649,952 7.8 % $ 649,952 $ 613,550 5.9 %
Property operating expense* (269,486 ) (251,697 ) 7.1 % (251,697 ) (234,478 ) 7.3 %
Property operating income $ 430,858 $ 398,255 8.2 % $ 398,255 $ 379,072 5.1 %
Weighted average number of homes 76,069 76,873 -1.0 % 76,873 74,550 3.1 %
Physical occupancy** 94.1 % 93.6 % 0.5 % 93.6 % 93.2 % 0.4 %

| * | Excludes depreciation, amortization, and property management expenses. Also
excludes $5.5 million of hurricane related
expenses in 2004 and $2.5 million of hurricane
related insurance recoveries in 2005. |
| --- | --- |
| ** | Based upon weighted average stabilized units. |

32

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

The following table is our reconciliation of property operating income to net income as reflected on the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the periods presented ( dollars in thousands ):

Property operating income 2005 — $ 430,858 $ 398,255 $ 379,072
Commercial operating income 1,997 512 733
Non-property income 16,849 2,608 1,068
Depreciation and amortization (215,192 ) (184,000 ) (166,577 )
Interest (162,723 ) (124,087 ) (117,416 )
General and administrative and property management (44,128 ) (37,197 ) (37,499 )
Other operating expenses (1,178 ) (1,314 ) (1,265 )
Net gains on
the sale of depreciable property and an unconsolidated joint venture 143,547 52,903 15,941
Loss on early debt retirement (8,483 ) — —
Impairment loss on real estate and investments — — (1,392 )
Hurricane related expenses — (5,503 ) —
Hurricane related insurance recoveries 2,457 — —
Minority interests (8,838 ) (5,025 ) (2,261 )
Net income per the Consolidated Statements of Operations $ 155,166 $ 97,152 $ 70,404

2005-vs.-2004

Same Communities

Our same communities (those communities acquired, developed, and stabilized prior to September 30, 2004 and held on December 31, 2005, which consisted of 58,840 apartment homes) provided 73% of our property operating income for the year ended December 31, 2005.

For the year ended December 31, 2005, same community property operating income increased 3.4% or $10.3 million compared to 2004. The increase in property operating income was primarily attributable to a 3.8% or $18.6 million increase in revenues from rental and other income that was partially offset by a 4.4% or $8.3 million increase in operating expenses. The increase in revenues from rental and other income was primarily driven by a 2.0% or $10.3 million increase in rental rates, a 20.2% or $2.9 million decrease in concession expense, a 7.5% or $2.6 million increase in utility reimbursement income and fee income, a 7.8% or $2.5 million decrease in vacancy loss, and a 15.6% or $0.4 million decrease in bad debt expense. Physical occupancy increased 0.6% to 94.5%.

The increase in property operating expenses was primarily driven by a 4.3% or $2.0 million increase in real estate taxes, a 3.8% or $1.9 million increase in personnel costs, a 3.8% or $1.1 million increase in utilities expense, a 2.9% or $0.9 million increase in repair and maintenance costs, a 4.7% or $0.8 million increase in administrative and marketing costs, a 46.7% or $0.7 million increase in incentive compensation, and a 5.4% or $0.5 million increase in insurance costs.

As a result of the percentage changes in property rental income and property operating expenses, the operating margin (property operating income divided by property rental income) decreased 0.3% to 61.5%.

Non-Mature Communities

The remaining 27% of our property operating income during 2005 was generated from communities that we classify as “non-mature communities” (primarily those communities acquired or developed in 2003, 2004 and 2005, sold properties, and those properties classified as real estate held for disposition). The 41 communities with 12,458 apartment homes that we acquired in the fourth quarter of 2003, and in 2004 and 2005, provided $87.5 million of property operating income. The 22 communities with 6,352 apartment homes and 240 condominiums sold during 2005 provided $10.0 million of property operating income. In addition, our development communities, which included 244 apartment homes constructed since January 1, 2003, provided $0.7 million of property operating income during 2005, the four communities with a total of 384 condominiums classified as real estate held for disposition provided $0.3 million of property operating income, and other non-mature communities which includes homes that are undergoing major rehabilitation, provided $17.5

33

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

million of property operating income for the year ended December 31, 2005.

2004-vs.-2003

Same Communities

Our same communities (those communities acquired, developed, and stabilized prior to December 31, 2003 and held on December 31, 2004, which consisted of 62,497 apartment homes) provided 78% of our property operating income for the year ended December 31, 2004.

For 2004, same community property operating income decreased 1.2% or $3.9 million compared to 2003. The overall decrease in property operating income was primarily attributable to a 0.5% or $2.3 million increase in revenues from rental and other income that was offset by a 3.2% or $6.2 million increase in operating expenses. The increase in revenues from rental and other income was primarily driven by a 7.7% or $2.8 million decrease in vacancy loss and a 14.3% or $2.1 million increase in utility reimbursement income. These increases in income were offset by a 0.7% or $3.6 million decrease in rental rates. Physical occupancy increased 0.8% to 93.8%.

The increase in property operating expenses was primarily driven by a 5.4% or $2.8 million increase in personnel costs, a 4.7% or $1.5 million increase in repair and maintenance costs, a 3.5% or $1.1 million increase in utilities expense, and a 1.6% or $0.8 million increase in property taxes.

As a result of the percentage changes in property rental income and property operating expenses, the operating margin decreased 1.0% to 61.0%.

Non-Mature Communities

The remaining 22% of our property operating income during 2004 was generated from communities that we classify as “non-mature communities” (primarily those communities acquired or developed during 2003 and 2004, sold properties, and those properties classified as real estate held for disposition). The 39 communities with 11,574 apartment homes that we acquired during 2003 and 2004 provided $45.8 million of property operating income. The 19 communities with 5,425 apartment homes sold during 2004 provided $14.4 million of property operating income. In addition, our development communities, which included 178 apartment homes constructed since January 1, 2003, provided $1.0 million of property operating income during 2004, the 12 communities with 2,635 apartment homes classified as real estate held for disposition provided $11.3 million of property operating income, and other non-mature communities provided $13.5 million of property operating income for the year ended December 31, 2004.

Real Estate Depreciation and Amortization

For the year ended December 31, 2005, real estate depreciation and amortization on both continuing and discontinued operations increased $31.8 million or 17.6% compared to 2004, primarily due to the significant increase in the per home acquisition cost compared to the existing portfolio, and other capital expenditures.

For the year ended December 31, 2004, real estate depreciation and amortization on both continuing and discontinued operations increased $17.2 million or 10.5% compared to 2003, primarily due to the overall increase in the weighted average number of apartment homes, the significant increase in the per home acquisition cost compared to the existing portfolio, and other capital expenditures.

Interest Expense

For the year ended December 31, 2005, interest expense on both continuing and discontinued operations increased $47.2 million or 38.1% from 2004 primarily due to the issuance of debt and $8.5 million in prepayment penalties. For the year ended December 31, 2005, the weighted average amount of debt outstanding increased 30.7% or $697.4 million compared to 2004 and the weighted average interest rate increased from 5.0% to 5.3% during 2005. The weighted average amount of debt outstanding during 2005 is higher than 2004 as acquisition costs in 2005 have been funded, in most part, by the issuance of debt. The increase in the weighted average interest rate during 2005 reflects short-term bank borrowings and variable rate debt that had higher interest rates when compared

34

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

to the prior year.

For the year ended December 31, 2004, interest expense on both continuing and discontinued operations increased $6.8 million or 5.8% from 2003 primarily due to the issuance of debt. For the year ended December 31, 2004, the weighted average amount of debt outstanding increased 21.2% or $435.9 million compared to the prior year. However, this was partially offset by the weighted average interest rate declining from 5.4% to 5.0% during 2004. The weighted average amount of debt outstanding during 2004 is higher than 2003 as acquisition costs in 2004 have been funded, in most part, by the issuance of debt. The decrease in the weighted average interest rate during 2004 reflects our ability to take advantage of lower interest rates through refinancing and the utilization of variable rate debt.

General and Administrative

For the year ended December 31, 2005, general and administrative expenses increased $5.5 million or 28.5% over 2004 primarily as a result of an increase in personnel and incentive compensation costs, an operating lease on an airplane, compliance costs and an operations improvement initiative.

For the year ended December 31, 2004, general and administrative expenses decreased $1.3 million or 6.4% over 2003. This decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in investor relations, legal and consulting expenses.

Hurricane Related Expenses and Hurricane Related Insurance Recoveries

In 2005, $2.5 million of hurricane related insurance recoveries were recorded. In 2004, we recognized a $5.5 million charge to cover expenses associated with the damage in Florida caused by hurricanes Charley, Frances, and Jeanne. United Dominion reported that 25 of its 34 Florida communities were affected by the hurricanes.

Impairment Loss on Real Estate and Investments

In 2003, we recognized a $1.4 million charge for the write-off of our investment in Realeum, Inc., an unconsolidated development joint venture created to develop web-based solutions for multifamily property and portfolio management.

Gains on the Sale of Land, Depreciable Property and an Unconsolidated Joint Venture

For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, we recognized gains for financial reporting purposes of $143.5 million and $52.9 million, respectively. Changes in the level of gains recognized from period to period reflect the changing level of our divestiture activity from period to period as well as the extent of gains related to specific properties sold.

Premium on Preferred Stock Conversions

In the fourth quarter of 2004, we exercised our right to redeem 2 million shares of our Series D Cumulative Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock. Upon receipt of our redemption notice, the shares to be redeemed were converted by the holder into 3,076,769 shares of common stock at a price of $16.25 per share. As a result, we recognized a $5.7 million premium on preferred stock conversions.

In the second quarter of 2003, we exercised our right to redeem 2 million shares of our Series D Cumulative Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock. Upon receipt of our redemption notice, the shares to be redeemed were converted by the holder into 3,076,923 shares of common stock at a price of $16.25 per share. In December 2003, we exercised our right to redeem an additional 4 million shares of our Series D preferred stock. Upon receipt of our redemption notice, the shares to be redeemed were converted by the holder into 6,154,000 shares of common stock at a price of $16.25 per share. As a result, we recognized a $19.3 million premium on preferred stock conversions during 2003.

35

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

The premium amount recognized to convert these shares represents the cumulative accretion to date between the conversion value of the preferred stock and the value at which it was recorded at the time of issuance.

eBay Purchase of Rent.com

On December 16, 2004, eBay announced that it had agreed to acquire privately held Rent.com, a leading Internet listing web site in the apartment and rental housing industry, for approximately $415 million plus acquisition costs, net of Rent.com’s cash on hand. On February 23, 2005, eBay announced that it had completed the acquisition. We owned shares in Rent.com, and as a result of the transaction, we recorded a one-time pre-tax gain of $12.3 million on the sale.

Inflation

We believe that the direct effects of inflation on our operations have been immaterial. Substantially all of our leases are for a term of one year or less which generally minimizes our risk from the adverse effects of inflation.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenue or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material.

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2005 ( dollars in thousands ):

Contractual Obligations Payments Due by Period — Total 2006 2007-2008 2009-2010 Thereafter
Long-Term Debt Obligations $ 3,159,777 $ 171,989 $ 769,179 $ 541,742 $ 1,676,867
Capital Lease Obligations — — — — —
Operating Lease Obligations 30,771 2,217 3,862 3,453 21,239
Purchase Obligations — — — — —
Other Long-Term Liabilities Reflected on
the Balance Sheet Under GAAP — — — — —

During 2005, we incurred interest costs of $165.5 million, of which $2.8 million was capitalized.

Factors Affecting Our Business and Prospects

There are many factors that affect our business and the results of our operations, some of which are beyond our control. These factors include:

| • | unfavorable changes in apartment market and economic conditions that could adversely
affect occupancy levels and rental rates, |
| --- | --- |
| • | the failure of acquisitions to achieve anticipated results, |
| • | possible difficulty in selling apartment communities, |
| • | the timing and closing of planned dispositions under agreement, |
| • | competitive factors that may limit our ability to lease apartment homes or increase
or maintain rents, |
| • | insufficient cash flow that could affect our debt financing and create refinancing
risk, |

36

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

| • | failure to generate sufficient revenue, which could impair our debt service payments
and distributions to stockholders, |
| --- | --- |
| • | development and construction risks that may impact our profitability, |
| • | potential damage from natural disasters, including hurricanes and other
weather-related events, which could result in substantial costs, |
| • | delays in completing developments and lease-ups on schedule, |
| • | our failure to succeed in new markets, |
| • | changing interest rates, which could increase interest costs and affect the market
price of our securities, |
| • | potential liability for environmental contamination, which could result in substantial costs, and |
| • | the imposition of federal taxes if we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year. |

Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Information required by this item is included in and incorporated by reference from Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of this Report.

Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The consolidated financial statements and related financial information required to be filed are attached to this Report. Reference is made to page 41 of this Report for the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedule.

Item 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

Item 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Controls and Procedures

As of December 31, 2005, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed with the objective of ensuring that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information required to be included in our periodic SEC reports. In addition, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that during the quarter ended December 31, 2005, there has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed with the objective of providing reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

It should be noted that the design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote. However, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief

37

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective under circumstances where our disclosure controls and procedures should reasonably be expected to operate effectively.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

United Dominion’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, United Dominion’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO).

Based on United Dominion’s evaluation, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2005. Management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005 has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report, which is included herein.

Item 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

PART III

Item 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the information set forth under the headings “Election of Directors,” “Audit Committee Report,” “Corporate Governance Matters-Audit Committee Financial Expert” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in our definitive proxy statement for our Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 2, 2006.

Information required by this item regarding our executive officers is included in Part I of this Report in the section entitled “Business-Executive Officers of the Company.”

We have a code of ethics for senior financial officers that applies to our principal executive officer, all members of our finance staff, including the principal financial officer, the principal accounting officer, the treasurer and the controller, our director of investor relations, our corporate secretary, and all other company officers. We also have a code of business conduct and ethics that applies to all of our employees. Information regarding our codes is available on our website, www.udrt.com , and is incorporated by reference to the information set forth under the heading “Corporate Governance Matters” in our definitive proxy statement for our Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 2, 2006. We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirements under Item 10 of Form 8-K regarding an amendment to, or a waiver from, a provision of our codes by posting such amendment or waiver on our website.

Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the information set forth under the headings “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management,” “Compensation of Executive Officers,” “Agreements with Executive Officers” and “Compensation of Directors” in our definitive proxy statement for our Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 2, 2006.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the information set forth under the headings “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” and “Equity Compensation Plan Information” in our definitive proxy statement for our Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 2, 2006.

38

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the information set forth under the heading “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” in our definitive proxy statement for our Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 2, 2006.

Item 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the information set forth under the headings “Audit Fees” and “Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures” in our definitive proxy statement for our Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 2, 2006.

PART IV

Item 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a) The following documents are filed as part of this Report:

  1. Financial Statements. See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedule on page 41 of this Report.

  2. Financial Statement Schedule. See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedule on page 41 of this Report. All other schedules are omitted because they are not required, are inapplicable, or the required information is included in the financial statements or notes thereto.

  3. Exhibits. The exhibits filed with this Report are set forth in the Exhibit Index.

39

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

UNITED DOMINION REALTY TRUST, INC.
By: /s/ Thomas W. Toomey
Thomas W. Toomey
Chief Executive Officer and President

Date: March 7, 2006

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below on March 7, 2006 by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated.

/s/ Thomas W. Toomey /s/ Jon A. Grove
Thomas W. Toomey Jon A. Grove
Chief Executive Officer, President,
and Director Director
/s/ Christopher D. Genry /s/ Thomas R. Oliver
Christopher D. Genry Thomas R. Oliver
Executive Vice President-
Corporate Strategy and
Chief Financial Officer Director
/s/ Scott A. Shanaberger /s/ Lynne B. Sagalyn
Scott A. Shanaberger Lynne B. Sagalyn
Senior Vice President
and Chief Accounting Officer Director
/s/ Robert C. Larson /s/ Mark J. Sandler
Robert C. Larson Mark J. Sandler
Chairman of the Board Director
/s/ James D. Klingbeil /s/ Robert W. Scharar
James D. Klingbeil Robert W. Scharar
Vice Chairman of the Board Director
/s/ Eric J. Foss /s/ Thomas C. Wajnert
Eric J. Foss Thomas C. Wajnert
Director Director
/s/
Robert P. Freeman
Robert
P. Freeman
Director

40

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULE

UNITED DOMINION REALTY TRUST, INC.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting 42
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FILED AS PART OF THIS REPORT
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 43
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2005 and 2004 44
Consolidated Statements of Operations for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005 45
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005 46
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005 47
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 48
SCHEDULE FILED AS PART OF THIS REPORT
Schedule III — Summary of Real Estate Owned 68

All other schedules are omitted since the required information is not present or is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or because the information required is included in the financial statements and notes thereto.

41

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Board of Directors and Stockholders United Dominion Realty Trust, Inc.

We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting included at Item 9A, that United Dominion Realty Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management’s assessment that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005 of United Dominion Realty Trust, Inc. and our report dated February 17, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Richmond, Virginia February 17, 2006

42

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Board of Directors and Stockholders United Dominion Realty Trust, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of United Dominion Realty Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of United Dominion Realty Trust, Inc. at December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 17, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Richmond, Virginia February 17, 2006

43

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

UNITED DOMINION REALTY TRUST, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (In thousands, except for share data)

December 31, — 2005 2004
ASSETS
Real estate owned:
Real estate held for investment $ 5,360,106 $ 4,795,278
Less: accumulated depreciation (1,123,119 ) (921,805 )
4,236,987 3,873,473
Real estate under development (net of accumulated depreciation of $140 and $0) 117,328 64,921
Real estate held for disposition (net of accumulated depreciation of $570 and $86,082) 34,280 297,015
Total real estate owned, net of accumulated depreciation 4,388,595 4,235,409
Cash and cash equivalents 15,543 7,904
Restricted cash 4,583 6,086
Deferred financing costs, net 31,036 25,151
Notes receivable 64,805 5,000
Investment in unconsolidated development joint venture — 458
Funds held in escrow from 1031 exchanges pending the acquisition of real estate — 17,039
Other assets 34,011 34,115
Other assets — real estate held for disposition 3,020 839
Total assets $ 4,541,593 $ 4,332,001
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Secured debt $ 1,116,259 $ 1,145,578
Secured debt — real estate held for disposition — 52,346
Unsecured debt 2,043,518 1,682,058
Real estate taxes payable 24,672 28,380
Accrued interest payable 26,672 18,773
Security deposits and prepaid rent 26,362 24,129
Distributions payable 45,313 44,624
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities 55,460 49,757
Other liabilities — real estate held for disposition 11,794 7,312
Total liabilities 3,350,050 3,052,957
Minority interests 83,819 83,593
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, no par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized
5,416,009 shares 8.60% Series B Cumulative Redeemable issued and outstanding
(5,416,009 in 2004) 135,400 135,400
2,803,812 shares 8.00% Series E Cumulative Convertible issued and outstanding
(2,803,812 in 2004) 46,571 46,571
Common stock, $0.01 par value ($1.00 par value in 2004); 250,000,000 shares authorized
134,012,053 shares issued and outstanding (136,429,592 in 2004) 1,340 136,430
Additional paid-in capital 1,680,115 1,608,858
Distributions in excess of net income (755,702 ) (731,808 )
Total stockholders’ equity 1,107,724 1,195,451
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 4,541,593 $ 4,332,001

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

44

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

UNITED DOMINION REALTY TRUST, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (In thousands, except per share data)

Years ended December 31, — 2005 2004 2003
REVENUES
Rental income $ 680,553 $ 572,408 $ 509,555
Non-property income:
Sale of technology investment 12,306 — —
Sale of
unconsolidated joint venture 3,823 — —
Other income 4,535 2,608 1,068
Total
non-property income 20,664 2,608 1,068
Total revenues 701,217 575,016 510,623
EXPENSES
Rental expenses:
Real estate taxes and insurance 81,151 66,424 57,756
Personnel 69,939 59,912 51,648
Utilities 40,037 34,360 30,069
Repair and maintenance 40,570 41,689 32,900
Administrative and marketing 23,846 20,013 18,541
Property management 19,309 17,881 16,873
Other operating expenses 1,178 1,226 1,205
Real estate depreciation and amortization 209,856 163,176 137,013
Interest 162,508 123,170 116,294
General and administrative 24,819 19,316 20,626
Other depreciation and amortization 2,752 3,301 3,001
Loss on early debt retirement 6,662 — —
Impairment loss on investments — — 1,392
Total expenses 682,627 550,468 487,318
Income before minority interests and discontinued operations 18,590 24,548 23,305
Minority interests of outside partnerships (108 ) (182 ) (614 )
Minority interests of unitholders in operating partnerships (180 ) 55 1,497
Income before discontinued operations, net of minority interests 18,302 24,421 24,188
Income from discontinued operations, net of minority interests 136,864 72,731 46,216
Net income 155,166 97,152 70,404
Distributions to preferred stockholders — Series B (11,644 ) (11,644 ) (11,645 )
Distributions to preferred stockholders — Series D (Convertible) — (3,473 ) (12,178 )
Distributions to preferred stockholders — Series E (Convertible) (3,726 ) (4,414 ) (2,503 )
Premium on preferred stock conversions — (5,729 ) (19,271 )
Net income available to common stockholders $ 139,796 $ 71,892 $ 24,807
Earnings per common share — basic:
Income/(loss) from
continuing operations available to common stockholders, net of minority interests $ 0.02 $ (0.01 ) $ (0.18 )
Income from discontinued operations, net of minority interests $ 1.01 $ 0.57 $ 0.40
Net income available to common stockholders $ 1.03 $ 0.56 $ 0.22
Earnings per
common share — diluted:
Income/(loss) from
continuing operations available to common stockholders, net of minority interests $ 0.02 $ (0.01 ) $ (0.18 )
Income from discontinued operations, net of minority interests $ 1.00 $ 0.57 $ 0.40
Net income available to common stockholders $ 1.02 $ 0.56 $ 0.22
Common distributions declared per share $ 1.20 $ 1.17 $ 1.14
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding — basic 136,143 128,097 114,672
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding — diluted 137,013 128,097 114,672

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

45

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

UNITED DOMINION REALTY TRUST, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (In thousands)

Years ended December 31, — 2005 2004 2003
Operating Activities
Net income $ 155,166 $ 97,152 $ 70,404
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 215,192 184,088 166,637
Impairment loss on real estate and investments — — 1,392
Net gains on the sale of land and depreciable property (139,724 ) (52,903 ) (15,941 )
Cancellation
of operating partnership units in connection with the sale of equity investment (1,000 ) — —
Gain on the sale of technology investment (12,306 ) — —
Gain on the sale of unconsolidated joint venture (3,823 ) — —
Distribution of earnings from unconsolidated joint venture 124 — —
Minority interests 8,838 5,025 2,261
Amortization of deferred financing costs and other 5,287 7,206 6,148
Amortization of deferred compensation 2,939 2,780 —
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Decrease/(increase) in operating assets 8,695 (1,769 ) (2,560 )
Increase in operating liabilities 8,798 10,168 6,604
Net cash provided by operating activities 248,186 251,747 234,945
Investing Activities
Proceeds
from the sale of real estate investments, net 308,753 190,105 93,613
Repayment of notes receivables 64,845 75,586 —
Acquisition
of real estate assets (net of liabilities assumed and equity) (413,744 ) (755,966 ) (314,739 )
Development of real estate assets (49,343 ) (19,131 ) (13,640 )
Capital expenditures and other major improvements — real estate assets (156,122 ) (82,390 ) (53,146 )
Capital expenditures — non-real estate assets (3,209 ) (1,578 ) (1,858 )
Proceeds from the sale of technology investment 12,306 — —
Distribution of capital from unconsolidated joint venture 458 — —
Decrease/(increase) in funds held in escrow from tax free exchanges pending the acquisition of real estate 17,039 (2,592 ) (14,447 )
Net cash used in investing activities (219,017 ) (595,966 ) (304,217 )
Financing Activities
Proceeds from the issuance of secured debt 25,342 — 37,415
Scheduled principal payments on secured debt (8,611 ) (36,814 ) (22,442 )
Non-scheduled principal payments on secured debt (125,221 ) (95,011 ) (17,549 )
Proceeds from the issuance of unsecured debt 499,983 475,775 323,382
Payments on unsecured debt (70,860 ) (46,585 ) (214,591 )
Net (repayment)/proceeds of revolving bank debt (67,300 ) 140,200 (37,900 )
Payment of financing costs (14,455 ) (8,849 ) (6,463 )
Issuance of note receivable — — (8,000 )
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock 4,334 99,461 179,811
Proceeds from the repayment of officer loans — 459 2,171
Proceeds from the issuance of performance shares 343 (50 ) 657
Purchase of minority interest from outside partners (522 ) — —
Conversion of operating partnership units to cash (50 ) — —
Distributions paid to minority interests (12,900 ) (13,553 ) (9,756 )
Distributions paid to preferred stockholders (15,370 ) (20,347 ) (27,532 )
Distributions paid to common stockholders (163,001 ) (147,387 ) (128,188 )
Repurchases of common and preferred stock (73,242 ) — (71 )
Net cash (used in)/provided by financing activities (21,530 ) 347,299 70,944
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 7,639 3,080 1,672
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 7,904 4,824 3,152
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $ 15,543 $ 7,904 $ 4,824
Supplemental Information:
Interest paid during the period $ 160,367 $ 115,519 $ 116,057
Non-cash transactions:
Conversion of operating partnership minority interests to common stock
(99,573 shares in 2005, 170,209 shares in 2004, and 216,983 shares in 2003) 1,444 2,035 2,206
Conversion of minority interests in Series B, LLC 690 — —
Issuance of restricted stock awards 7,709 3,250 5,297
Issuance of preferred stock in connection with acquisitions — — 58,811
Issuance of preferred operating partnership units in connection with acquisitions — — 26,872
Issuance of operating partnership units in connection with acquisitions 7,653 — 7,135
Cancellation of a note receivable with the acquisition of a property — 8,000 —
Secured debt assumed with the acquisition of properties 26,825 311,714 4,865
Receipt of a note receivable in connection with sales of real estate investments 124,650 75,586 —
Deferred gain in connection with the sale of real estate investments 6,410 — —

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

46

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

UNITED DOMINION REALTY TRUST, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (In thousands, except share data)

Deferred Notes
Compensation- Receivable Accumulated
Distributions in Unearned from Other
Preferred
Stock Common
Stock Paid-in Excess of Restricted Officer- Comprehensive
Shares Amount Shares Amount Capital Net Income Stock Awards Stockholders Loss Total
Balance, December 31, 2002 13,416,009 $ 310,400 106,605,259 $ 106,605 $ 1,140,786 $ (541,428 ) $ (2,504 ) $ (2,630 ) $ (9,958 ) $ 1,001,271
Comprehensive Income
Net income 70,404 70,404
Other comprehensive income:
Unrealized gain on
derivative
financial
instruments 8,096 8,096
Comprehensive income 70,404 8,096 78,500
Issuance of common and restricted shares 1,546,525 1,547 18,664 (5,297 ) 14,914
Issuance of common shares through public
offering 9,700,000 9,700 154,936 164,636
Issuance of 8.00% Series E Cumulative
Convertible shares 3,425,217 56,893 1,905 58,798
Common shares repurchased (4,564 ) (5 ) (66 ) (71 )
Adjustment for conversion of minority
interests of unitholders in operating
partnerships 216,983 217 1,989 2,206
Principal repayments on notes receivable from
officer-stockholders 2,171 2,171
Accretion of premium on Series D conversions 19,271 (19,271 ) —
Conversion of 7.50% Series D Cumulative
Convertible Redeemable shares (6,000,000 ) (150,000 ) 9,230,923 9,231 140,769 —
Common stock distributions declared
($1.14 per share) (134,876 ) (134,876 )
Preferred stock distributions declared-Series
B ($2.15 per share) (11,645 ) (11,645 )
Preferred stock distributions declared-Series
D ($2.04 per share) (12,178 ) (12,178 )
Preferred stock distributions declared-Series
E ($0.84 per share) (2,503 ) (2,503 )
Amortization of deferred compensation 2,213 2,213
Balance, December 31, 2003 10,841,226 236,564 127,295,126 127,295 1,458,983 (651,497 ) (5,588 ) (459 ) (1,862 ) 1,163,436
Comprehensive Income
Net income 97,152 97,152
Other comprehensive income:
Unrealized gain on
derivative
financial
instruments 1,862 1,862
Comprehensive income 97,152 1,862 99,014
Issuance of common and restricted shares 769,083 769 10,171 10,940
Issuance of common shares through public
offering 4,497,000 4,497 86,804 91,301
Adjustment for conversion of minority
interests of unitholders in operating
partnerships 170,209 170 1,865 2,035
Principal repayments on notes receivable from
officer-stockholders 459 459
Accretion of premium on Series D conversions 5,729 (5,729 ) —
Conversion of 7.50% Series D Cumulative
Convertible Redeemable shares (2,000,000 ) (50,000 ) 3,076,769 3,077 46,923 —
Conversion of 8.00% Series E Cumulative
Convertible shares (621,405 ) (10,322 ) 621,405 622 9,700 —
Common stock distributions declared
($1.17 per share) (152,203 ) (152,203 )
Preferred stock distributions declared-Series
B ($2.15 per share) (11,644 ) (11,644 )
Preferred stock distributions declared-Series
D ($2.09 per share) (3,473 ) (3,473 )
Preferred stock distributions declared-Series
E ($1.33 per share) (4,414 ) (4,414 )
Adjustment for FASB 123 adoption (5,588 ) 5,588 —
Balance, December 31, 2004 8,219,821 181,971 136,429,592 136,430 1,608,858 (731,808 ) — — — 1,195,451
Comprehensive Income
Net income 155,166 155,166
Comprehensive income 155,166 155,166
Issuance of common and restricted shares 663,238 680 6,595 7,275
Common shares repurchased (3,180,350 ) (32 ) (73,210 ) (73,242 )
Adjustment for change in par value from $1.00
to $0.01 (135,822 ) 135,822 —
Adjustment for conversion of minority
interests of unitholders in operating
partnerships 99,573 84 1,360 1,444
Adjustment for conversion of minority
interests in Series B LLC 690 690
Common stock distributions declared
($1.20 per share) (163,690 ) (163,690 )
Preferred stock distributions declared-Series
B ($2.15 per share) (11,644 ) (11,644 )
Preferred stock distributions declared-Series
E ($1.33 per share) (3,726 ) (3,726 )
Balance, December 31, 2005 8,219,821 $ 181,971 134,012,053 $ 1,340 $ 1,680,115 $ (755,702 ) $ — $ — $ — $ 1,107,724

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

47

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

UNITED DOMINION REALTY TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2005

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Organization and formation

United Dominion Realty Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation, was formed in 1972. United Dominion operates within one defined business segment with activities related to the ownership, management, development, acquisition, renovation, and disposition of multifamily apartment communities nationwide. At December 31, 2005, United Dominion owned 259 communities with 74,875 completed apartment homes and had five communities with 1,335 apartment homes under development.

Basis of presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of United Dominion and its subsidiaries, including United Dominion Realty, L.P., (the “Operating Partnership”), and Heritage Communities L.P. (the “Heritage OP”), (collectively, “United Dominion”). As of December 31, 2005, there were 166,300,080 units in the Operating Partnership outstanding, of which 156,122,288 units or 93.9% were owned by United Dominion and 10,177,792 units or 6.1% were owned by limited partners (of which 1,764,662 are owned by the holders of the Series A OPPS, see below). As of December 31, 2005, there were 5,542,200 units in the Heritage OP outstanding, of which 5,203,572 units or 93.9% were owned by United Dominion and 338,628 units or 6.1% were owned by limited partners. The consolidated financial statements of United Dominion include the minority interests of the unitholders in the Operating Partnership and the Heritage OP. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of estimates

The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual amounts realized or paid could differ from those estimates. Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current financial statement presentation.

Real estate

Real estate assets held for investment are carried at historical cost less accumulated depreciation and any recorded impairment losses.

Expenditures for ordinary repair and maintenance costs are charged to expense as incurred. Expenditures for improvements, renovations, and replacements related to the acquisition and/or improvement of real estate assets are capitalized at cost and depreciated over their estimated useful lives if the value of the existing asset will be materially enhanced or the life of the related asset will be substantially extended beyond the original life expectancy.

United Dominion recognizes impairment losses on long-lived assets used in operations when there is an event or change in circumstance that indicates an impairment in the value of an asset and the undiscounted future cash flows are not sufficient to recover the asset’s carrying value. Our cash flow estimates are based upon historical results adjusted to reflect our best estimate of future market and operating conditions and our estimated holding periods. If such indicators of impairment are present, an impairment loss is recognized based on the excess of the carrying amount of the asset over its fair value. Our estimates of fair market value represent our best estimate based upon industry trends and reference to market rates and transactions.

United Dominion purchases real estate investment properties from time to time and allocates the purchase price to various components, such as land, buildings, and intangibles related to in-place leases in accordance with FASB Statement No. 141, “Business Combinations.” The purchase price is allocated based on the relative fair value of each component. The fair value of buildings is determined as if the buildings were vacant upon acquisition and subsequently leased at market rental rates. As such, the determination of fair value considers the present value of all

48

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

UNITED DOMINION REALTY TRUST, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2005

cash flows expected to be generated from the property including an initial lease up period. United Dominion determines the fair value of in-place leases by assessing the net effective rent and remaining term of the lease relative to market terms for similar leases at acquisition. The fair value of in-place leases is recorded and amortized as amortization expense over the remaining contractual lease period. United Dominion determines the fair value of in-place leases by considering the cost of acquiring similar leases, the foregone rents associated with the lease-up period, and the carrying costs associated with the lease-up period.

For long-lived assets to be disposed of, impairment losses are recognized when the fair value of the asset less estimated cost to sell is less than the carrying value of the asset. Properties classified as real estate held for disposition generally represent properties that are under contract for sale. Real estate held for disposition is carried at the lower of cost, net of accumulated depreciation, or fair value, less the cost to dispose, determined on an asset-by-asset basis. Expenditures for ordinary repair and maintenance costs on held for disposition properties are charged to expense as incurred. Expenditures for improvements, renovations, and replacements related to held for disposition properties are capitalized at cost. Depreciation is not recorded on real estate held for disposition.

Depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the related assets which is 35 years for buildings, 10 to 35 years for major improvements, and 3 to 10 years for furniture, fixtures, equipment, and other assets. The value of acquired in-place leases is amortized over the remaining term of each acquired in-place lease.

All development projects and related carrying costs are capitalized and reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as “Real estate under development.” As each building in a project is completed and becomes available for lease-up, the total cost of the building is transferred to real estate held for investment and the assets are depreciated over their estimated useful lives. The cost of development projects includes interest, real estate taxes, insurance, and allocated development overhead during the construction period.

Interest, real estate taxes, and incremental labor and support costs for personnel working directly on the development site are capitalized as part of the real estate under development to the extent that such charges do not cause the carrying value of the asset to exceed its net realizable value. During 2005, 2004, and 2003, total interest capitalized was $2.8 million, $1.0 million, and $1.8 million, respectively.

Cash equivalents

Cash equivalents include all cash and liquid investments with maturities of three months or less when purchased.

Restricted cash

Restricted cash consists of escrow deposits held by lenders for real estate taxes, insurance and replacement reserves, and security deposits.

Deferred financing costs

Deferred financing costs include fees and other external costs incurred to obtain debt financings and are generally amortized on a straight-line basis, which approximates the effective interest method, over a period not to exceed the term of the related debt. Unamortized financing costs are written-off when debt is retired before its maturity date. During 2005, 2004, and 2003, amortization expense was $6.5 million, $5.1 million, and $4.7 million, respectively.

Investments in unconsolidated development joint ventures

Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures are accounted for using the equity method when major business decisions require approval by the other partners and United Dominion does not have control of the assets. Investments are recorded at cost and subsequently adjusted for equity in net income (loss) and cash contributions

49

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

UNITED DOMINION REALTY TRUST, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2005

and distributions. United Dominion eliminates intercompany profits on sales of services that are provided to joint ventures. Differences between the carrying value of investments and the underlying equity in net assets of the investee are due to capitalized interest on the investment balance and capitalized development and leasing costs that are recovered by United Dominion through fees during construction.

Revenue recognition

United Dominion’s apartment homes are leased under operating leases with terms generally of one year or less. Rental income is recognized after it is earned and collectability is reasonably assured.

Advertising costs

All advertising costs are expensed as incurred and reported on the Consolidated Statements of Operations within the line item “Administrative and marketing.” During 2005, 2004, and 2003, total advertising expense was $11.2 million, $10.5 million, and $10.6 million, respectively.

Interest rate swap agreements

United Dominion accounts for its derivative instruments in accordance with Statements of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133 and No. 138, “Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” At December 31, 2005, United Dominion has no derivative financial instruments reported on its Consolidated Balance Sheet. Prior to their maturity in July 2004, United Dominion’s derivative financial instruments consisted of interest rate swap agreements that were designated as cash flow hedges of debt with variable interest rate features, and as qualifying hedges for financial reporting purposes. For a derivative instrument that qualifies as a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument is reported as a component of other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings during the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. The remaining gain or loss on the derivative instrument in excess of the cumulative change in the present value of future cash flows of the hedged item, if any, is recognized in current earnings during the period of change.

As part of United Dominion’s overall interest rate risk management strategy, we used derivative financial instruments as a means to artificially fix variable rate debt or to hedge anticipated financing transactions. United Dominion’s derivative transactions used for interest rate risk management included various interest rate swaps with indices that related to the pricing of specific financial instruments of United Dominion. Because of the close correlation between the hedging instrument and the underlying cash flow exposure being hedged, fluctuations in the value of the derivative instruments were generally offset by changes in the cash flow of the underlying exposures. As a result, United Dominion appropriately controlled the risk so that derivatives used for interest rate risk management would not have a material unintended effect on consolidated earnings. United Dominion does not enter into derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.

The fair value of United Dominion’s derivative instruments were reported on the balance sheet at their current fair value. The estimated fair value for our interest rate swaps relied on prevailing market interest rates. The interest rate swap agreements were designated with all or a portion of the principal balance and term of a specific debt obligation. Each interest rate swap involved the periodic exchange of payments over the life of the related agreement. An amount received or paid on the interest rate swap was recorded on an accrual basis as an adjustment to the related interest expense of the outstanding debt based on the accrual method of accounting. The related amount payable to and receivable from counterparties was included in other liabilities and other assets, respectively.

When the terms of the underlying transaction were modified, or when the underlying hedged item ceased to exist, all changes in the fair value of the instrument were marked-to-market with changes in value included in net income each period until the instrument matured, unless the instrument was redesignated as a hedge of another transaction. If a derivative instrument was terminated or the hedging transaction was no longer determined to be effective, amounts held in accumulated other comprehensive income were reclassified into earnings over the term of the future cash outflows on the related debt.

50

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

UNITED DOMINION REALTY TRUST, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2005

Comprehensive income

Comprehensive income, which is defined as all changes in equity during each period except for those resulting from investments by or distributions to stockholders, is displayed in the accompanying Statements of Stockholders’ Equity. Other comprehensive income for 2004 and 2003 consisted of unrealized gains or losses from derivative financial instruments.

Stock-based employee compensation plans

United Dominion adopted the fair-value-based method of accounting for share-based payments effective January 1, 2004 using the prospective method described in FASB Statement No. 148 , “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure.” Currently, United Dominion uses the Black-Scholes-Merton formula to estimate the value of stock options granted to employees and expects to continue to use this acceptable option valuation model upon the required adoption of Statement 123(R) on January 1, 2006. Because Statement 123(R) must be applied not only to new awards but to previously granted awards that are not fully vested on the effective date, and because United Dominion adopted Statement 123 using the prospective transition method (which applied only to awards granted, modified or settled after the adoption date), compensation cost for some previously granted awards that were not recognized under Statement 123 will be recognized under Statement 123(R). We do not anticipate that the adoption of Statement 123(R) will have a material impact on our financial statements.

Minority interests in operating partnerships

Interests in operating partnerships held by limited partners are represented by operating partnership units (“OP Units”). The operating partnerships’ income is allocated to holders of OP Units based upon net income available to common stockholders and the weighted average number of OP Units outstanding to total common shares plus OP Units outstanding during the period. Capital contributions, distributions, and profits and losses are allocated to minority interests in accordance with the terms of the individual partnership agreements. OP Units can be exchanged for cash or shares of United Dominion’s common stock on a one-for-one basis, at the option of United Dominion. OP Units, as a percentage of total OP Units and shares outstanding, were 5.9% at December 31, 2005, 6.3% at December 31, 2004, and 6.4% at December 31, 2003.

During 2003, we issued 1,617,815 Preferred Operating Partnership Units (“Preferred OP Units”) totaling $26.9 million as partial consideration for the purchase of four communities. The Preferred OP Units carry a fixed coupon of 8.0% ($1.33 per share) until such time as the common share dividend is equal to or exceeds this amount for four consecutive quarters, at which time the Preferred OP Units will be entitled to receive dividends equivalent to the dividend paid to holders of common stock.

Minority interests in other partnerships

United Dominion has limited partners in certain real estate partnerships acquired in certain merger transactions. Net income for these partnerships is allocated based upon the percentage interest owned by these limited partners in each respective real estate partnership.

Earnings per share

Basic earnings per common share is computed based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per common share is computed based upon common shares outstanding plus the effect of dilutive stock options and other potentially dilutive common stock equivalents. The dilutive effect of stock options and other potentially dilutive common stock equivalents is determined using the treasury stock method based on United Dominion’s average stock price.

51

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

UNITED DOMINION REALTY TRUST, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2005

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earning per share (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts):

| Numerator for basic and diluted earnings
per share - Net income available to common
stockholders | 2005 — $ 139,796 | $ | 71,892 | $ | 24,807 | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Denominator: | | | | | | |
| Denominator for basic earnings per
share - Weighted average common shares
outstanding | 136,920 | | 128,711 | | 115,109 | |
| Non-vested restricted stock awards | (777 | ) | (614 | ) | (437 | ) |
| | 136,143 | | 128,097 | | 114,672 | |
| Effect of dilutive securities: | | | | | | |
| Employee stock options and non-vested restricted stock awards | 870 | | — | | — | |
| Denominator for dilutive earnings
per share | 137,013 | | 128,097 | | 114,672 | |
| Basic earnings per share | $ 1.03 | $ | 0.56 | $ | 0.22 | |
| Diluted
earnings per share | $ 1.02 | $ | 0.56 | $ | 0.22 | |

The effect of the conversion of the operating partnership units, Series A Out-Performance Partnership Shares, and convertible preferred stock is not dilutive and is therefore not included in the above calculations. If the operating partnership units were converted to common stock, the additional shares of common stock outstanding for the three years ended December 31, 2005, would be 10,324,037, 10,460,639, and 9,690,883 weighted average common shares, respectively. If the Series A Out-Performance Partnership Shares were converted to common stock, the additional shares of common stock outstanding for the three years ended December 31, 2005, would be 1,778,251, 1,791,329, and 1,853,204 weighted average common shares, respectively. If the convertible preferred stock were converted to common stock, the additional shares of common stock outstanding for the three years ended December 31, 2005, would be 2,803,812, 6,301,821, and 11,636,293 weighted average common shares, respectively.

Income taxes

United Dominion is operated as, and elects to be taxed as, a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). Generally, a REIT complies with the provisions of the Code if it meets certain requirements concerning its income and assets, as well as if it distributes at least 90% of its REIT taxable income to its stockholders and will not be subject to U.S. federal income taxes if it distributes at least 100% of its income. Accordingly, no provision has been made for federal income taxes of the REIT. United Dominion is subject to certain state and local excise or franchise taxes, for which provision has been made. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, our taxable income will be subject to United States Federal income tax at regular corporate rates (including any applicable alternative minimum tax). Even if we qualify as a REIT, we may be subject to certain state and local income taxes and to United States Federal income tax. We also will be required to pay a 100% tax on non-arms length transactions between us and a taxable REIT subsidiary and on any net income from sales of property that the IRS successfully asserts was property held for sale to customers in the ordinary course.

The differences between net income available to common stockholders for financial reporting purposes and taxable income before dividend deductions relate primarily to temporary differences, principally real estate depreciation and the tax deferral of certain gains on property sales. The differences in depreciation result from differences in the book and tax basis of certain real estate assets and the differences in the methods of depreciation and lives of the real estate assets.

Impact of recently issued accounting pronouncements

In March 2005, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 47, “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations, an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143, Asset Retirement Obligations” (FIN 47). A conditional asset retirement obligation refers to a legal obligation to retire assets where the timing and/or method of settlement are conditioned on future events. FIN 47 requires an entity to recognize a liability for the fair value of a conditional asset retirement obligation when incurred if the liability’s fair value can be reasonably estimated. We adopted the provisions of FIN 47 for the year ended December 31, 2005. The adoption of this Interpretation did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In June 2005, the FASB ratified its consensus in EITF Issue 04-05, “Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights” (Issue 04-05). The effective date for Issue 04-05 is June 29, 2005 for all new or modified partnerships and January 1, 2006 for our remaining partnerships for the applicable provisions. The adoption of the provisions of EITF 04-05 is not anticipated to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

2. REAL ESTATE OWNED

United Dominion operates in 43 markets dispersed throughout 16 states. At December 31, 2005, our largest apartment market was Southern California, where we owned 19.8% of our apartment homes, based upon carrying value. Excluding Southern California, United Dominion did not own more than 6.7% of its apartment homes in any one market, based upon carrying value.

52

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

UNITED DOMINION REALTY TRUST, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2005

The following table summarizes real estate held for investment at December 31, (dollars in thousands ):

Land and land improvements 2005 — $ 1,289,107 $ 1,145,259
Buildings and improvements 3,804,555 3,430,339
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment 266,444 219,680
Real estate held for investment 5,360,106 4,795,278
Accumulated depreciation (1,123,119 ) (921,805 )
Real estate held for investment, net $ 4,236,987 $ 3,873,473

The following is a reconciliation of the carrying amount of real estate held for investment at December 31, ( dollars in thousands ):

Balance at beginning of year 2005 — $ 4,795,278 2004 — $ 3,669,907 2003 — $ 3,220,769
Real estate acquired 400,588 1,025,066 399,425 (a)
Capital expenditures 164,240 100,305 47,725
Transfers from development — — 12,157
Transfers to held for disposition, net — — (10,169 )
Balance at end of year $ 5,360,106 $ 4,795,278 $ 3,669,907

(a) In connection with one of our acquisitions in 2003, United Dominion acquired a note receivable for $5 million that is due October 2011. The note bears interest of 9.0% that is payable in annual installments.

The following is a reconciliation of accumulated depreciation for real estate held for investment at December 31, ( dollars in thousands ):

Balance at beginning of year 2005 — $ 921,805 $ 761,339 2003 — $ 626,327
Depreciation expense for the year (b) 206,005 160,466 136,482
Transfers to
wholly owned taxable REIT subsidiary (4,691 ) — —
Transfers to
held for disposition, net — — (1,470 )
Balance at end of year $ 1,123,119 $ 921,805 $ 761,339

(b) Includes $0.8 million, $0.8 million, and $1.0 million for 2005, 2004, and 2003, respectively, related to depreciation on non-real estate assets located at United Dominion’s apartment communities, classified as “Other depreciation and amortization” on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Excludes $4.8 million, $3.4 million, and $1.3 million in 2005, 2004, and 2003, respectively, of amortization expense on the fair market value of in-place leases at the time of acquisition.

53

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

UNITED DOMINION REALTY TRUST, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2005

The following is a summary of real estate held for investment by major geographic markets (in order of carrying value, excluding real estate held for disposition and real estate under development) at December 31, 2005 ( dollars in thousands ):

Apartment Initial — Acquisition Carrying Accumulated
Communities Cost Value Depreciation Encumbrances
MID-ATLANTIC REGION
Metropolitan DC 8 $ 226,964 $ 251,024 $ 28,044 $ 30,691
Raleigh, NC 11 179,935 218,931 69,640 63,752
Baltimore, MD 10 146,257 169,951 37,096 13,286
Richmond, VA 9 106,326 156,903 52,635 61,532
Greensboro, NC 8 85,362 110,713 34,119 —
Charlotte, NC 7 88,294 110,229 30,795 —
Wilmington, NC 6 64,213 98,512 34,592 —
Norfolk, VA 6 42,741 68,968 27,877 9,117
Other North Carolina 8 61,677 81,159 34,497 13,320
Other Mid-Atlantic 6 46,135 61,200 20,184 16,770
Other Virginia 3 30,946 48,888 15,138 19,462
WESTERN REGION
Southern California 26 1,014,412 1,062,700 61,347 230,292
Northern California 10 334,096 356,640 42,186 67,354
Seattle, WA 8 158,622 167,657 24,608 68,452
Monterey Peninsula, CA 7 85,323 140,507 22,135 —
Portland, OR 5 76,990 81,625 11,223 17,790
SOUTHEASTERN REGION
Tampa, FL 12 203,254 251,435 57,456 61,749
Orlando, FL 14 167,524 230,968 79,061 69,311
Nashville, TN 9 111,843 156,721 41,703 28,976
Jacksonville, FL 4 82,396 103,277 25,411 —
Atlanta, GA 6 57,669 78,116 28,611 18,558
Columbia, SC 6 52,795 67,911 27,082 —
Other Florida 6 106,255 118,984 17,880 44,873
Other Southeastern 2 29,839 41,610 13,143 —
SOUTHWESTERN REGION
Houston, TX 16 185,965 253,408 67,194 39,604
Arlington, TX 7 85,845 104,796 28,669 18,375
Denver, CO 3 92,333 100,142 21,927 —
Phoenix, AZ 5 74,368 98,543 27,843 37,081
Dallas, TX 4 89,552 96,208 17,716 51,971
Austin, TX 5 75,779 83,484 19,574 6,073
Other Southwestern 10 166,468 200,980 56,402 53,558
MIDWESTERN REGION
Columbus, OH 6 111,315 160,093 40,016 39,278
Other Midwestern 3 20,241 23,980 5,720 5,985
Richmond Corporate — 6,597 2,212 1,435 3,724
Commercial — 1,631 1,631 160 —
256 $ 4,469,962 $ 5,360,106 $ 1,123,119 $ 1,090,934

54

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

UNITED DOMINION REALTY TRUST, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2005

The following is a summary of real estate held for disposition by major category at December 31, 2005 ( dollars in thousands ):

Number of Initial — Acquisition Carrying Accumulated
Properties Cost Value Depreciation Encumbrances
Apartments 4 $ 47,285 $ 29,203 $ 78 $ —
Land 2 5,556 5,647 492 —
$ 52,841 $ 34,850 $ 570 $ —

The following is a summary of real estate under development by major category at December 31, 2005 ( dollars in thousands ):

Number of Initial — Acquisition Carrying Accumulated
Properties Cost Value Depreciation Encumbrances
Apartments 3 $ 52,515 $ 96,717 $ 140 $ 25,325
Land 4 20,751 20,751 — —
$ 73,266 $ 117,468 $ 140 $ 25,325
Total Real Estate Owned $ 4,596,069 $ 5,512,424 $ 1,123,829 $ 1,116,259

In 2005, $2.5 million of hurricane related insurance recoveries were recorded. In 2004, United Dominion recognized a $5.5 million charge to cover expenses associated with the damage in Florida caused by hurricanes Charley, Frances, and Jeanne. United Dominion reported that 25 of its 34 Florida communities were affected by the hurricanes.

In 2003, United Dominion recognized a $1.4 million charge for the write-off of its investment in Realeum, Inc., an unconsolidated development joint venture created to develop web-based solutions for multifamily property and portfolio management.

3. INCOME FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

United Dominion adopted FASB Statement No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” (FAS 144) as of January 1, 2002. FAS 144 requires, among other things, that the primary assets and liabilities and the results of operations of United Dominion’s real properties which have been sold subsequent to January 1, 2002, or are held for disposition subsequent to January 1, 2002, be classified as discontinued operations and segregated in United Dominion’s Consolidated Statements of Operations and Balance Sheets. Properties classified as real estate held for disposition generally represent properties that are under contract for sale and are expected to close within the next twelve months. For purposes of these financial statements, FAS 144 results in the presentation of the primary assets and liabilities and the net operating results of those properties sold or classified as held for disposition through December 31, 2005, as discontinued operations for all periods presented. The adoption of FAS 144 does not have an impact on net income available to common stockholders. FAS 144 only results in the reclassification of the operating results of all properties sold or classified as held for disposition through December 31, 2005 within the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003, and the reclassification of the assets and liabilities within the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2005 and 2004.

For the year ended December 31, 2005, United Dominion sold 22 communities with a total of 6,352 apartment homes, 240 condominiums from five communities with a total of 648 condominiums, and one parcel of land. We recognized gains for financial reporting purposes of $139.7 million on these sales. At December 31, 2005, United Dominion had four communities with a total of 384 condominiums and a net book value of $29.1 million, and two

55

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

UNITED DOMINION REALTY TRUST, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2005

parcels of land with a net book value of $5.2 million included in real estate held for disposition. In conjunction with the sale of ten communities in July 2005, we received short-term notes for $124.7 million that bear interest at 6.75% and had maturities ranging from September 2005 to July 2006. As of December 31, 2005, the balance on the notes receivable was $59.8 million. We recognized gains for financial reporting purposes of $15.2 million and will recognize $6.4 million in additional gains in 2006 as the notes receivable mature and are paid. During 2004, United Dominion sold 19 communities with a total of 5,425 apartment homes, 24 condominiums from a community of 36 condominiums, and one parcel of land. During 2003, United Dominion sold seven communities with a total of 1,927 apartment homes and two commercial properties. The results of operations for these properties and the interest expense associated with the secured debt on these properties are classified on the Consolidated Statements of Operations in the line item entitled “Income from discontinued operations, net of minority interests.”

The following is a summary of income from discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, ( dollars in thousands) :

Rental income 2005 — $ 21,817 $ 77,999 $ 104,735
Non-property income/(loss) 8 (2 ) —
21,825 77,997 104,735
Rental expenses 11,515 34,829 43,810
Real estate depreciation 2,568 17,452 26,380
Interest 215 831 883
Loss on early debt retirement 1,821 — —
Other expenses 16 159 243
16,135 53,271 71,316
Income
before net gain on the sale of depreciable property
and minority interests 5,690 24,726 33,419
Net gain on the sale of depreciable property 139,724 52,903 15,941
Income before minority interests 145,414 77,629 49,360
Minority interests on income from discontinued operations (8,550 ) (4,898 ) (3,144 )
Income from discontinued operations, net of minority interests $ 136,864 $ 72,731 $ 46,216

56

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

UNITED DOMINION REALTY TRUST, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2005

4. SECURED DEBT

Secured debt on continuing and discontinued operations of United Dominion’s real estate portfolio, which encumbers $1.9 billion or 35% of real estate owned based upon book value ($3.6 billion or 65% of United Dominion’s real estate owned is unencumbered) consists of the following as of December 31, 2005 ( dollars in thousands ):

Principal Outstanding Weighted — Average Weighted — Average Number of — Communities
December 31, December 31, Interest Rate Years to Maturity Encumbered
2005 2004 2005 2005 2005
Fixed Rate Debt
Mortgage notes payable $ 359,281 $ 428,223 5.33 % 5.4 14
Tax-exempt secured notes payable 26,400 39,160 5.85 % 19.1 3
Fannie Mae credit facilities 363,875 288,875 6.09 % 5.3 9
Total fixed rate secured debt 749,556 756,258 5.71 % 5.8 26
Variable Rate Debt
Mortgage notes payable 66,464 45,758 5.40 % 5.1 4
Tax-exempt secured note payable 7,770 7,770 3.45 % 22.5 1
Fannie Mae credit facilities 292,469 367,469 4.71 % 6.9 47
Freddie Mac credit facility — 20,669 n/a n/a n/a
Total variable rate secured debt 366,703 441,666 4.81 % 6.9 52
Total secured debt $ 1,116,259 $ 1,197,924 5.42 % 6.2 78

Fixed Rate Debt

Mortgage notes payable Fixed rate mortgage notes payable are generally due in monthly installments of principal and interest and mature at various dates from September 2006 through July 2027 and carry interest rates ranging from 4.10% to 7.87%.

Tax-exempt secured notes payable Fixed rate mortgage notes payable that secure tax-exempt housing bond issues mature at various dates from May 2008 through March 2031 and carry interest rates ranging from 5.30% to 6.47%. Interest on these notes is generally payable in semi-annual installments.

Secured credit facilities At December 31, 2005, United Dominion’s fixed rate secured credit facilities consisted of $363.9 million of the $656.3 million outstanding on an $860 million aggregate commitment under four revolving secured credit facilities with Fannie Mae. The Fannie Mae credit facilities are for an initial term of ten years, bear interest at floating and fixed rates, and can be extended for an additional five years at our discretion. As of December 31, 2005, the fixed rate Fannie Mae credit facilities had a weighted average fixed rate of interest of 6.09%.

Variable Rate Debt

Mortgage notes payable Variable rate mortgage notes payable are generally due in monthly installments of principal and interest and mature at various dates from May 2006 through July 2013. As of December 31, 2005, these notes had interest rates ranging from 4.82% to 6.23%.

Tax-exempt secured note payable The variable rate mortgage note payable that secures tax-exempt housing bond issues matures in July 2028. As of December 31, 2005, this note had an interest rate of 3.45%. Interest on this note is payable in monthly installments.

57

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

UNITED DOMINION REALTY TRUST, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2005

Secured credit facilities At December 31, 2005, United Dominion’s variable rate secured credit facilities consisted of $292.5 million outstanding on the Fannie Mae credit facilities. As of December 31, 2005, the variable rate Fannie Mae credit facilities had a weighted average floating rate of interest of 4.71%.

The aggregate maturities of secured debt for the fifteen years subsequent to December 31, 2005 are as follows ( dollars in thousands ):

Fixed — Mortgage Tax-Exempt Credit Variable — Mortgage Tax-Exempt Credit
Year Notes Notes Facilities Notes Notes Facilities TOTAL
2006 $ 31,703 $ 320 $ — $ 4,750 $ — $ — $ 36,593
2007 81,247 345 — 901 — — 82,493
2008 4,109 5,145 — 23,578 — — 32,832
2009 4,330 245 — — — — 4,575
2010 98,007 265 138,875 — — — 237,147
2011 11,797 280 125,000 — — 39,513 176,590
2012 50,312 300 100,000 — — 52,956 203,568
2013 61,885 315 — 37,415 — 200,000 299,615
2014 704 340 — — — — 1,044
2015 756 360 — — — — 1,116
2016 812 — — — — — 812
2017 873 — — — — — 873
2018 939 — — — — — 939
2019 1,010 — — — — — 1,010
2020 1,087 — — — — — 1,087
Thereafter 9,710 18,485 — — 7,770 — 35,965
$ 359,281 $ 26,400 $ 363,875 $ 66,464 $ 7,770 $ 292,469 $ 1,116,259

During the first quarter of 2005, we prepaid approximately $110 million of secured debt. In conjunction with these prepayments, we incurred prepayment penalties of $8.5 million in both continuing and discontinued operations as “Loss on early debt retirement.” These penalties were funded by the proceeds from the sale of our technology investment of $12.3 million.

5. UNSECURED DEBT

A summary of unsecured debt as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 is as follows ( dollars in thousands ):

2005 2004
Commercial Banks
Borrowings outstanding under an
unsecured credit facility due May 2008 (a) $ 210,800 $ 278,100
Senior
Unsecured Notes — Other
7.73% Medium-Term Notes due April 2005 — 21,100
7.02% Medium-Term Notes due November 2005 — 49,760
7.95% Medium-Term Notes due July 2006 85,374 85,374
7.07% Medium-Term Notes due November 2006 25,000 25,000
7.25% Notes due January 2007 92,255 92,255
4.30% Medium-Term Notes due July 2007 75,000 75,000
4.50% Medium-Term Notes due March 2008 200,000 200,000
8.50% Monthly Income Notes due November 2008 29,081 29,081
4.25% Medium-Term Notes due January 2009 50,000 50,000
6.50% Notes due June 2009 200,000 200,000
3.90% Medium-Term Notes due March 2010 50,000 50,000
5.00% Medium-Term Notes due January 2012 100,000 100,000
5.13% Medium-Term Notes due January 2014 200,000 200,000

58

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

UNITED DOMINION REALTY TRUST, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2005

2005 2004
5.25% Medium-Term Notes due January 2015 250,000 100,000
5.25% Medium-Term Notes due January 2016 100,000 —
8.50% Debentures due September 2024 54,118 54,118
4.00%
Convertible Senior Notes due December 2035 (b) 250,000 —
Other (c) 370 750
1,761,198 1,332,438
Unsecured Notes — Other
Verano Construction Loan due February 2006 24,820 24,820
ABAG Tax-Exempt Bonds due August 2008 46,700 46,700
71,520 71,520
Total Unsecured Debt $ 2,043,518 $ 1,682,058

| (a) | During the second quarter of 2005, United Dominion amended and restated its $500 million
unsecured revolving credit facility and extended the term an additional two years. The credit
facility matures on May 31, 2008, and at United Dominion’s option, can be extended for an
additional year. United Dominion has the right to increase the credit facility to $750
million if the initial lenders increase their commitments or we receive commitments from
additional lenders. Based on United Dominion’s current credit ratings, the credit facility
carries an interest rate equal to LIBOR plus a spread of 57.5 basis points, which represents a
12.5 basis point reduction to the previous unsecured revolver, and the facility fee was
reduced from 20 basis points to 15 basis points. Under a competitive bid feature and for so
long as United Dominion maintains an Investment Grade Rating, United Dominion has the right to
bid out 100% of the commitment amount. |
| --- | --- |
| (b) | Prior to December 15, 2030, upon the occurrence of
specified events, the notes will be convertible at the option of the
holder into cash and, in certain circumstances, shares of United
Dominion’s common stock at an initial conversion rate of
35.2988 shares per $1,000 principal amount of notes (which equates to
an initial conversion price of approximately $28.33 per share).
On or after December 15, 2030, the notes will be convertible at
any time prior to the second business day prior to maturity at the
option of the holder into cash and, in certain circumstances, shares
of United Dominion’s common stock at the above initial conversion
rate. The initial conversion rate is subject to adjustment in certain
circumstances. |
| (c) | Represents deferred gains from the termination of interest rate risk management agreements. |

The following is a summary of short-term bank borrowings under United Dominion’s bank credit facility at December 31, ( dollars in thousands ):

2005 2004 2003
Total revolving credit facilities at December 31 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000
Borrowings outstanding at December 31 210,800 278,100 137,900
Weighted average daily borrowings during the year 315,487 127,665 171,179
Maximum daily borrowings during the year 440,200 356,500 272,800
Weighted average interest rate during the year 3.6 % 2.0 % 2.1 %
Weighted average interest rate at December 31 4.7 % 2.7 % 1.6 %
Weighted average interest rate at December 31 -
after giving effect to swap agreements n/a n/a 4.2 %

At December 31, 2004, all of United Dominion’s interest rate swap agreements associated with commercial bank borrowings had matured.

6. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Preferred Stock

The Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock has no stated par value and a liquidation preference of $25 per share. The Series B has no voting rights except as required by law. The Series B has no stated maturity and is not subject to any sinking fund or mandatory redemption and is not convertible into any of our other securities. The Series B is not redeemable prior to May 29, 2007. On or after this date, the Series B may be redeemed for cash at our option, in whole or in part, at a redemption price of $25 per share plus accrued and unpaid dividends. The redemption price is payable solely out of the sale proceeds of our other capital stock. All dividends due and payable on the Series B have been accrued or paid as of the end of each fiscal year.

59

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

UNITED DOMINION REALTY TRUST, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2005

Distributions declared on the Series B in 2005 were $2.15 per share or $0.5375 per quarter. The Series B is listed on the NYSE under the symbol “UDRpb.” At December 31, 2005, a total of 5,416,009 shares of the Series B were outstanding.

All of the remaining outstanding shares of our Series D Cumulative Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock were converted by the holder into shares of our common stock. The Series D had no stated maturity, no stated par value, no voting rights except as required by law, and a liquidation preference of $25 per share. The Series D was convertible at any time into 1.5385 shares of common stock, subject to certain adjustments, at the option of the holder of the Series D. We had the option to redeem at any time all or part of the Series D at a price per share of $25, payable in cash, plus all accrued and unpaid dividends, provided that the current market price of our common stock was at least equal to the conversion price, initially set at $16.25 per share.

In 2004, we exercised our right to redeem the remaining 2 million shares of our Series D that were outstanding. Upon receipt of our redemption notice, the shares to be redeemed were converted by the holder into 3,076,769 shares of common stock at a price of $16.25 per share. In 2003, we exercised our right to redeem 6 million shares of our Series D. Upon receipt of our redemption notice, the 6 million shares to be redeemed were converted by the holder into 9,230,923 shares of common stock at a price of $16.25 per share.

The Series E Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock has no stated par value and a liquidation preference of $16.61 per share. Subject to certain adjustments and conditions, each share of the Series E is convertible at any time and from time to time at the holder’s option into one share of our common stock. The holders of the Series E are entitled to vote on an as-converted basis as a single class in combination with the holders of common stock at any meeting of our stockholders for the election of directors or for any other purpose on which the holders of common stock are entitled to vote. The Series E has no stated maturity and is not subject to any sinking fund or any mandatory redemption.

In 2004, Series E holders converted a total of 621,405 shares of Series E into 621,405 shares of our common stock.

Distributions declared on the Series E in 2005 were $1.33 per share or $0.3322 per quarter. The Series E is not listed on any exchange. At December 31, 2005 a total of 2,803,812 shares of the Series E were outstanding.

Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan

United Dominion’s Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (the “Stock Purchase Plan”) allows common and preferred stockholders the opportunity to purchase, through the reinvestment of cash dividends, additional shares of United Dominion’s common stock. As of December 31, 2005, 9,849,009 shares of common stock had been issued under the Stock Purchase Plan. Shares in the amount of 15,150,991 were reserved for further issuance under the Stock Purchase Plan as of December 31, 2005. During 2005, 55,818 shares were issued under the Stock Purchase Plan for a total consideration of approximately $1.3 million.

Restricted Stock Awards

United Dominion’s 1999 Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) authorizes the grant of restricted stock awards to employees, officers, consultants, and directors of United Dominion. Deferred compensation expense is recorded over the vesting period and is based upon the value of the common stock on the date of issuance. For the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, we recognized $3.2 million, $2.7 million, and $2.2 million, respectively, of compensation expense related to the amortization of restricted stock. As of December 31, 2005, 903,481 shares of restricted stock have been issued under the LTIP.

Shareholder Rights Plan

United Dominion’s First Amended and Restated Rights Agreement is intended to protect long-term interests of stockholders in the event of an unsolicited, coercive or unfair attempt to take over United Dominion. The plan authorized a dividend of one Preferred Share Purchase Right (the “Rights”) on each share of common stock outstanding. Each Right, which is not currently exercisable, will entitle the holder to purchase 1/1000 of a share of a

60

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

UNITED DOMINION REALTY TRUST, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2005

new series of United Dominion’s preferred stock, to be designated as Series C Junior Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock, at a price to be determined upon the occurrence of the event, and for which the holder must be paid $45 should the takeover occur. Under the Plan, the rights will be exercisable if a person or group acquires more than 15% of United Dominion’s common stock or announces a tender offer that would result in the ownership of 15% of United Dominion’s common stock.

7. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The following estimated fair values of financial instruments were determined by United Dominion using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data and develop estimated fair values. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts United Dominion would realize on the disposition of the financial instruments. The use of different market assumptions or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts. The carrying amounts and estimated fair value of United Dominion’s financial instruments as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands) :

2005 — Carrying Fair 2004 — Carrying Fair
Amount Value Amount Value
Secured debt $ 1,116,259 $ 1,123,108 $ 1,197,924 $ 1,228,953
Unsecured debt 2,043,518 2,032,211 1,682,058 1,654,760

The following methods and assumptions were used by United Dominion in estimating fair values.

Cash equivalents

The carrying amount of cash equivalents approximates fair value.

Notes receivable

In July 2005, United Dominion received short-term notes in the principal amount of $124.7 million that bear interest at 6.75% and had maturities ranging from September 2005 to July 2006. The notes were received in conjunction with the sale of ten communities. As of December 31, 2005, the outstanding balance on these notes was $59.8 million. In June 2003, United Dominion received a promissory note in the principal amount of $5 million that is due October 2011. The note was received in connection with one of our acquisitions and bears interest of 9.0% that is payable in annual installments. The carrying amount of these notes receivable approximate their fair value.

Secured and unsecured debt

Estimated fair value is based on mortgage rates, tax-exempt bond rates, and corporate unsecured debt rates believed to be available to United Dominion for the issuance of debt with similar terms and remaining lives. The carrying amount of United Dominion’s variable rate secured debt approximates fair value as of December 31, 2005 and 2004. The carrying amounts of United Dominion’s borrowings under variable rate unsecured debt arrangements, short-term revolving credit agreements, and lines of credit approximate their fair values as of December 31, 2005 and 2004.

Derivative financial instruments

At December 31, 2005, United Dominion has no derivative financial instruments reported on its Consolidated Balance Sheet.

For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, United Dominion recognized $1.9 million and $8.1 million, respectively, of unrealized gains in comprehensive income. For the year ended December 31, 2004, United

61

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

UNITED DOMINION REALTY TRUST, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2005

Dominion recognized a loss of $0.2 million in net income related to the ineffective portion of United Dominion’s hedging instruments. For the year ended December 31, 2003, United Dominion recognized $0.3 million in realized gains in net income related to the ineffective portion of United Dominion’s hedging instruments.

8. INCOME TAXES

The aggregate cost of our real estate assets for federal income tax purposes was approximately $4.9 billion at December 31, 2005.

The following table reconciles United Dominion’s net income to REIT taxable income for the three years ended December 31, 2005 (dollars in thousands) :

Net income 2005 — $ 155,166 $ 97,152 $ 70,404
Elimination of TRS income (17,802 ) (1,120 ) (246 )
Minority interest (1,828 ) (1,950 ) (3,364 )
Depreciation and amortization expense 56,274 46,916 44,108
Disposition of properties (74,323 ) (10,029 ) 2,363
Revenue recognition timing differences (87 ) (195 ) 1,750
Investment loss, not deductible for tax — (593 ) —
Other expense timing differences (1,160 ) (1,072 ) (844 )
REIT taxable income before dividends $ 116,240 $ 129,109 $ 114,171
Dividend paid deduction $ 149,475 $ 153,409 $ 132,722

For income tax purposes, distributions paid to common stockholders may consist of ordinary income, capital gains, and non-taxable return of capital, or a combination thereof. Distributions that exceed our current and accumulated earnings and profits constitute a return of capital rather than taxable income and reduce the stockholder’s basis in their common shares. To the extent that a distribution exceeds both current and accumulated earnings and profits and the stockholder’s basis in the common shares, it generally will be treated as a gain from the sale or exchange of that stockholder’s common shares. For the three years ended December 31, 2005, distributions declared per common share were taxable as follows:

62

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

UNITED DOMINION REALTY TRUST, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2005

2005 2004 2003
Ordinary income $ 0.64 $ 0.77 $ 0.82
Long-term capital gain 0.22 0.20 0.10
Unrecaptured section 1250 gain 0.13 0.08 0.02
Return of capital 0.21 0.12 0.20
$ 1.20 $ 1.17 $ 1.14

We have a taxable REIT subsidiary that is subject to state and federal income taxes. Income tax expense consists of the following for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, and is included in gains on the sales ( dollars in thousands ):

2005 2004
Income tax expense
Current $ 11,090 $ 867
Deferred 313 —
Total income tax expense $ 11,403 $ 867

Income tax expense differed from the amounts computed by applying the U.S. federal income tax rate of 35% to pretax income for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 as follows ( dollars in thousands ):

2005 2004
Income tax expense
Computed tax expense $ 10,193 $ 675
Increase in income tax expense
resulting from state taxes and other 1,210 192
Total income tax expense $ 11,403 $ 867

Deferred income taxes reflect the estimated net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the corresponding amounts for income tax purposes. Our taxable REIT subsidiary’s deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows at December 31, 2005 and 2004 ( dollars in thousands ):

2005 2004
Deferred tax assets:
Depreciation $ 32 $ —
Reserves 19 —
Total deferred tax assets 51 —
Deferred tax liabilities:
Gain on sales (49 ) —
Interest (315 ) —
Total deferred tax liabilities (364 ) —
Net deferred tax liability $ (313 ) $ —

9. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

Profit Sharing Plan

The United Dominion Realty Trust, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan (the “Plan”) is a defined contribution plan covering all eligible full-time employees. Under the Plan, United Dominion makes discretionary profit sharing and matching contributions to the Plan as determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. Aggregate

63

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

UNITED DOMINION REALTY TRUST, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2005

provisions for contributions, both matching and discretionary, which are included in United Dominion’s Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three years ended December 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003 were $0.6 million, $0.6 million, and $0.3 million, respectively.

Stock Option Plan

In May 2001, the stockholders of United Dominion approved the 1999 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”), which supersedes the 1985 Stock Option Plan. With the approval of the LTIP, no additional grants will be made under the 1985 Stock Option Plan. The LTIP authorizes the granting of awards which may take the form of options to purchase shares of common stock, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, dividend equivalents, other stock-based awards, and any other right or interest relating to common stock or cash. The Board of Directors reserved 4 million shares for issuance upon the grant or exercise of awards under the LTIP. The LTIP generally provides, among other things, that options are granted at exercise prices not lower than the market value of the shares on the date of grant and that options granted must be exercised within ten years. The maximum number of shares of stock that may be issued subject to incentive stock options is 4 million shares. Shares under options that expire or are cancelable are available for subsequent grant.

United Dominion adopted the fair-value-based method of accounting for share-based payments effective January 1, 2004 using the prospective method described in FASB Statement No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure.” Currently, United Dominion uses the Black-Scholes-Merton formula to estimate the value of stock options granted to employees and expects to continue to use this acceptable option valuation model upon the required adoption of Statement 123(R) on January 1, 2006. Because Statement 123(R) must be applied not only to new awards but to previously granted awards that are not fully vested on the effective date, and because United Dominion adopted Statement 123 using the prospective transition method (which applied only to awards granted, modified or settled after the adoption date), compensation cost for some previously granted awards that were not recognized under Statement 123 will be recognized under Statement 123(R). There were no options granted during 2005, 2004 or 2003.

A summary of United Dominion’s stock option activity during the three years ended December 31, 2005 is provided in the following table:

Outstanding Exercise Price Range of — Exercise Prices
Balance, December 31, 2002 3,667,329 $ 12.01 $ 9.63 — $ 15.38
Granted — — —
Exercised (1,106,142 ) 12.41 9.63 — 15.38
Forfeited (25,000 ) 9.65 9.63 — 9.88
Balance, December 31, 2003 2,536,187 $ 11.88 $ 9.63 — $ 15.38
Granted — — —
Exercised (562,064 ) 11.90 9.63 — 15.25
Forfeited (13,500 ) 12.02 10.88 — 13.96
Balance, December 31, 2004 1,960,623 $ 11.88 $ 9.63 — $ 15.38
Granted — — —
Exercised (298,566 ) 12.02 9.88 — 14.63
Forfeited (19,834 ) 13.80 9.88 — 15.25
Balance, December 31, 2005 1,642,223 $ 11.84 $ 9.63 — $ 15.38
Exercisable at December 31,
2003 2,207,685 $ 11.77 $ 9.63 — $ 15.38
2004 1,938,343 11.84 9.63 — 15.38
2005 1,635,666 11.82 9.63 — 15.38

64

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

UNITED DOMINION REALTY TRUST, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2005

The weighted average remaining contractual life on all options outstanding is 4.1 years. 643,110 of share options had exercise prices between $9.63 and $10.88, 596,796 of share options had exercise prices between $11.15 and $12.23, and 402,317 of share options had exercise prices between $13.76 and $15.38.

As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, stock-based awards for 2,583,586 and 2,890,251 shares of common stock, respectively, were available for future grants under the 1999 LTIP’s existing authorization.

10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Commitments

Real Estate Under Development

United Dominion is committed to completing its real estate currently under development, which has an estimated cost to complete of $48.5 million as of December 31, 2005.

Land and Other Leases

United Dominion is party to several ground leases relating to operating communities. In addition, United Dominion is party to various other operating leases related to the operation of its regional offices and an airplane. Future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable land and other leases as of December 31, 2005 are as follows (dollars in thousands):

Ground Operating
Leases Leases
2006 $ 1,060 $ 1,157
2007 1,060 902
2008 1,060 840
2009 1,064 837
2010 1,064 488
Thereafter 21,239 —
$ 26,547 $ 4,224

United Dominion incurred $2.4 million of rent expense for the year ended December 31, 2005. United Dominion incurred $1.9 million of rent expense for each of the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003.

Contingencies

Series B Out-Performance Program

In May 2003, the stockholders of United Dominion approved the Series B Out-Performance Program (the “Series B Program”) pursuant to which certain executive officers of United Dominion (the “Series B Participants”) were given the opportunity to invest indirectly in United Dominion by purchasing interests in a limited liability company (the “Series B LLC”), the only asset of which is a special class of partnership units of United Dominion Realty, L.P. (“Series B Out-Performance Partnership Shares” or “Series B OPPSs”) . The purchase price for the Series B OPPSs was determined by United Dominion’s board of directors to be $1 million, assuming 100% participation, and was based upon the advice of an independent valuation expert. The Series B Program measured the cumulative total return on our common stock over the 24-month period from June 1, 2003 to May 31, 2005.

The Series B Program was designed to provide participants with the possibility of substantial returns on their investment if the total cumulative return on United Dominion’s common stock, as measured by the cumulative amount of dividends paid plus share price appreciation during the measurement period (a) exceeded the cumulative total return of the Morgan Stanley REIT Index peer group index over the same period; and (b) was at least the

65

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

UNITED DOMINION REALTY TRUST, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2005

equivalent of a 22% total return, or 11% annualized.

At the conclusion of the measurement period on May 31, 2005, United Dominion’s total cumulative return did not satisfy these criteria, and therefore, the Series B LLC as holder of the Series B OPPSs did not receive (for the indirect benefit of the Series B Participants as holders of interests in the Series B LLC) distributions and allocations of income and loss from the Operating Partnership (accounted for on a consistent basis with all other OP Units) equal to the distributions and allocations that would be received on the number of OP Units. As a result, the investment made by the holders of the Series B OPPSs was forfeited.

Series C Out-Performance Program

In May 2005, the stockholders of United Dominion approved the Series C Out-Performance Program (the “Series C Program”) pursuant to which certain executive officers and other key employees of United Dominion (the “Series C Participants”) were given the opportunity to invest indirectly in United Dominion by purchasing interests in UDR Out-Performance III, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Series C LLC”), the only asset of which is a special class of partnership units of United Dominion Realty, L.P. (“Series C Out-Performance Partnership Shares” or “Series C OPPSs”) . The purchase price for the Series C OPPSs was determined by the Compensation Committee of United Dominion’s board of directors to be $750,000, assuming 100% participation, and was based upon the advice of an independent valuation expert. The Series C Program will measure the cumulative total return on our common stock over the 36-month period from June 1, 2005 to May 30, 2008.

The Series C Program is designed to provide participants with the possibility of substantial returns on their investment if the total cumulative return on United Dominion’s common stock, as measured by the cumulative amount of dividends paid plus share price appreciation during the measurement period is at least the equivalent of a 36% total return, or 12% annualized (“Minimum Return”).

At the conclusion of the measurement period, if United Dominion’s total cumulative return satisfies these criteria, the Series C LLC as holder of the Series C OPPSs will receive (for the indirect benefit of the Series C Participants as holders of interests in the Series C LLC) distributions and allocations of income and loss from the Operating Partnership equal to the distributions and allocations that would be received on the number of OP Units obtained by:

| i. | determining the amount by which the cumulative total return of United
Dominion’s common stock over the measurement period exceeds the Minimum Return
(such excess being the “Excess Return”); |
| --- | --- |
| ii. | multiplying 2% of the Excess Return by United Dominion’s market
capitalization (defined as the average number of shares outstanding over
the 36-month period, including common stock, OP Units, and common stock
equivalents) multiplied by the daily closing price of United Dominion’s common
stock, up to a maximum of 1% of market capitalization; and |
| iii. | dividing the number obtained in (ii) by the market value of one share
of United Dominion’s common stock on the valuation date, determined by the
volume-weighted average price per day of common stock for the 20 trading days
immediately preceding the valuation date. |

If, on the valuation date, the cumulative total return of United Dominion’s common stock does not meet the Minimum Return, then the Series C Participants will forfeit their entire initial investment.

Litigation and Legal Matters

United Dominion is subject to various legal proceedings and claims arising in the ordinary course of business. United Dominion cannot determine the ultimate liability with respect to such legal proceedings and claims at this time. United Dominion believes that such liability, to the extent not provided for through insurance or otherwise, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flow.

66

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

UNITED DOMINION REALTY TRUST, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2005

11. INDUSTRY SEGMENTS

United Dominion owns and operates multifamily apartment communities throughout the United States that generate rental and other property related income through the leasing of apartment units to a diverse base of tenants. United Dominion separately evaluates the performance of each of its apartment communities. However, because each of the apartment communities has similar economic characteristics, facilities, services, and tenants, the apartment communities have been aggregated into a single apartment communities segment. All segment disclosure is included in or can be derived from United Dominion’s consolidated financial statements.

There are no tenants that contributed 10% or more of United Dominion’s total revenues during 2005, 2004, or 2003.

12. UNAUDITED SUMMARIZED CONSOLIDATED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA

Summarized consolidated quarterly financial data for the year ended December 31, 2005, with restated amounts that reflect discontinued operations as of December 31, 2005, is as follows (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) :

Three Months Ended
Previously Previously Previously
Reported Restated Reported Restated Reported Restated
March 31 March 31 June 30 June 30 September 30 September 30 December 31
Rental income (a) $ 171,331 $ 163,331 $ 169,427 $ 168,078 $ 172,514 $ 172,273 $ 176,871
Income before minority interests and discontinued operations 6,662 6,208 5,561 5,005 3,106 3,055 4,322
Gain on sale of land and depreciable property 7,023 7,023 46,781 46,781 12,851 12,851 73,068
Income from discontinued operations, net of minority interests 8,499 8,924 47,041 47,549 11,952 11,999 68,392
Net income available to common stockholders 11,099 11,099 48,599 48,599 11,293 11,292 68,806
Earnings per common share:
Basic $ 0.08 $ 0.08 $ 0.36 $ 0.36 $ 0.08 $ 0.08 $ 0.51
Diluted 0.08 0.08 0.36 0.36 0.08 0.08 0.50

(a) Represents rental income from continuing operations.

Summarized consolidated quarterly financial data for the year ended December 31, 2004, with restated amounts that reflect discontinued operations as of December 31, 2005, is as follows (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) :

Three Months Ended — Previously Previously Previously Previously
Reported Restated Reported Restated Reported Restated Reported Restated
March 31(a) March 31(a) June 30 (a) June 30 (a) September 30(a) September 30(a) December 31(a) December 31(a)
Rental income (b) $ 135,501 $ 135,137 $ 139,357 $ 139,013 $ 142,590 $ 142,280 $ 156,288 $ 155,978
Income before minority interests and discontinued operations 7,746 7,667 9,576 9,514 3,364 3,351 4,050 4,016
Gain on sale of land and depreciable property 1,205 1,205 13,814 13,814 20,220 20,220 17,664 17,664
Income from discontinued operations, net of minority interests 7,716 7,790 19,173 19,231 24,297 24,310 21,368 21,400
Net income available to common stockholders 8,665 8,665 21,855 21,855 21,160 21,160 20,212 20,212
Earnings per common share:
Basic $ 0.07 $ 0.07 $ 0.17 $ 0.17 $ 0.17 $ 0.17 $ 0.15 $ 0.15
Diluted 0.07 0.07 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.15 0.15

| (a) | The first, second and third quarters of 2004 each include $1.6 million of expense for
premiums paid for the conversion of shares of Series D preferred stock into common stock. The
fourth quarter of 2004 includes $1.0 million of expense for premiums paid for the conversion
of shares of Series D preferred stock into common stock. |
| --- | --- |
| (b) | Represents rental income from continuing operations. |

67

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

LANDSCAPE

UNITED DOMINION REALTY TRUST

SCHEDULE III — REAL ESTATE OWNED

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005

Cost of Gross Amount at
Initial Costs Improvements Which Carried at Close of Period
Total Capitalized
Land and Buildings Initial Subsequent Land and Buildings Total
Land and Acquisition to Acquisition Land and Carrying Accumulated Date of Date
Property Encumbrances Improvements Improvements Costs (Net of Disposals) Improvements Improvements Value (A) Depreciation (B) Construction Acquired
MID-ATLTANTIC REGION
Dominion Middle Ridge $ 17,769,407 $ 3,311,468 $ 13,283,047 $ 16,594,515 $ 3,549,584 $ 3,536,061 $ 16,608,039 $ 20,144,099 $ 5,673,690 1990 06/25/96
Dominion Lake Ridge 12,921,808 2,366,061 8,386,439 10,752,500 2,825,393 2,573,392 11,004,501 13,577,893 3,959,984 1987 02/23/96
Presidential Greens — 11,237,698 18,789,985 30,027,683 2,628,284 11,387,017 21,268,950 32,655,967 4,663,728 1938 05/15/02
Taylor Place — 6,417,889 13,411,278 19,829,167 4,385,013 6,591,430 17,622,750 24,214,180 4,034,036 1962 04/17/02
Ridgewood — 5,612,147 20,085,474 25,697,621 3,573,634 5,684,212 23,587,043 29,271,255 4,777,857 1988 08/26/02
The Calvert — 262,807 11,188,623 11,451,430 2,917,630 2,330,329 12,038,731 14,369,061 1,628,459 1962 11/26/03
Commons at Town Square — 135,780 10,012,173 10,147,953 600,795 9,154,107 1,594,641 10,748,747 258,829 1971 12/03/03
Waterside Towers — 873,713 46,852,061 47,725,775 2,893,127 34,675,076 15,943,825 50,618,902 2,196,087 1971 12/03/03
Waterside Townhomes — 129,000 4,621,000 4,750,000 323,665 3,638,423 1,435,242 5,073,665 195,924 1971 12/03/03
Wellington Place at Olde Town — 13,753,346 36,233,961 49,987,307 362,520 13,753,346 36,596,481 50,349,827 655,589 1987 09/13/05
METROPOLITAN DC 30,691,215 44,099,910 182,864,041 226,963,950 24,059,645 93,323,393 157,700,203 251,023,595 28,044,183
Dominion On Spring Forest — 1,257,500 8,586,255 9,843,755 5,664,058 1,819,508 13,688,305 15,507,813 8,063,732 1978/81 05/21/91
Dominion Park Green — 500,000 4,321,872 4,821,872 2,895,880 742,725 6,975,027 7,717,752 3,665,544 1987 09/27/91
Dominion On Lake Lynn 12,134,000 3,622,103 12,405,020 16,027,123 5,925,326 4,313,650 17,638,799 21,952,449 7,529,371 1986 12/01/92
Dominion Courtney Place — 1,114,600 5,119,259 6,233,859 4,575,575 1,510,378 9,299,056 10,809,434 4,900,517 1979/81 07/08/93
Dominion Walnut Ridge 9,589,520 1,791,215 11,968,852 13,760,067 4,218,718 2,316,086 15,662,699 17,978,785 6,657,701 1982/84 03/04/94
Dominion Walnut Creek 15,153,866 3,170,290 21,717,407 24,887,697 6,569,026 3,814,435 27,642,288 31,456,723 11,616,249 1985/86 05/17/94
Dominion — 907,605 6,819,154 7,726,759 1,989,904 1,062,270 8,654,393 9,716,663 3,125,715 1988 08/15/96
Copper Mill — 1,548,280 16,066,720 17,615,000 1,710,445 1,925,344 17,400,101 19,325,445 5,483,226 1997 12/31/96
Trinity Park 10,968,900 4,579,648 17,575,712 22,155,360 2,591,061 4,695,582 20,050,839 24,746,421 6,214,686 1987 02/28/97
Meadows at Kildaire 15,906,030 2,846,027 20,768,425 23,614,452 2,108,239 6,925,532 18,797,159 25,722,691 6,798,874 2000 05/25/00
Oaks at Weston — 9,943,644 23,305,862 33,249,506 747,025 10,203,256 23,793,275 33,996,531 5,584,096 2001 06/28/02
RALEIGH, NC 63,752,316 31,280,912 148,654,538 179,935,450 38,995,258 39,328,765 179,601,942 218,930,708 69,639,710
Gatewater Landing — 2,078,422 6,084,526 8,162,948 3,803,951 2,352,778 9,614,121 11,966,899 4,359,887 1970 12/16/92
Dominion Kings Place — 1,564,942 7,006,574 8,571,516 2,227,550 1,671,923 9,127,143 10,799,066 3,893,849 1983 12/29/92
Dominion At Eden Brook — 2,361,167 9,384,171 11,745,338 3,518,669 2,726,003 12,538,004 15,264,007 5,397,884 1984 12/29/92
Dominion Great Oaks 13,285,808 2,919,481 9,099,691 12,019,172 5,571,060 4,328,152 13,262,080 17,590,232 6,469,950 1974 07/01/94
Dominion Constant Friendship — 903,122 4,668,956 5,572,078 1,566,714 1,086,412 6,052,380 7,138,792 2,425,700 1990 05/04/95
Lakeside Mill — 2,665,869 10,109,175 12,775,044 1,510,604 2,710,326 11,575,322 14,285,648 4,703,932 1989 12/10/99
Tamar Meadow — 4,144,926 17,149,514 21,294,440 2,272,188 4,202,461 19,364,168 23,566,628 3,593,416 1990 11/22/02
Calvert’s Walk — 4,408,192 24,692,115 29,100,307 1,568,902 4,452,121 26,217,088 30,669,209 2,759,740 1988 03/30/04
Arborview — 4,653,393 23,951,828 28,605,221 1,523,017 4,694,342 25,433,896 30,128,238 2,736,663 1992 03/30/04
Liriope — 1,620,382 6,790,681 8,411,063 131,693 1,622,363 6,920,392 8,542,755 755,333 1997 03/30/04
BALTIMORE, MD 13,285,808 27,319,896 118,937,230 146,257,126 23,694,348 29,846,880 140,104,594 169,951,474 37,096,354
Dominion Olde West — 1,965,097 12,203,965 14,169,062 5,512,982 2,444,251 17,237,793 19,682,044 9,307,383 1978/82/84/85/87 12/31/84 & 8/27/91
Dominion Creekwood — — — — 3,331,437 76,962 3,254,475 3,331,437 955,451 1984 08/27/91
Dominion Laurel Springs — 464,480 3,119,716 3,584,196 3,056,812 778,979 5,862,029 6,641,008 2,894,355 1972 09/06/91
Dominion English Hills 15,409,295 1,979,174 11,524,313 13,503,487 7,771,090 2,873,091 18,401,486 21,274,577 10,231,879 1969/76 12/06/91
Dominion Gayton Crossing 10,063,000 825,760 5,147,968 5,973,728 7,111,805 1,435,820 11,649,713 13,085,533 7,614,479 1973 09/28/95
Dominion West End 16,896,683 2,059,252 15,049,088 17,108,340 5,801,844 2,870,787 20,039,397 22,910,184 7,711,367 1989 12/28/95
Courthouse Green 7,865,616 732,050 4,702,353 5,434,403 3,741,406 1,196,356 7,979,453 9,175,809 5,052,964 1974/78 12/31/84
Waterside At Ironbridge 11,297,000 1,843,819 13,238,590 15,082,409 2,377,879 2,068,745 15,391,543 17,460,288 4,494,457 1987 09/30/97
Carriage Homes at Wyndham — 473,695 30,996,525 31,470,220 975,207 3,654,306 28,791,121 32,445,427 3,679,651 1998 11/25/03
Legacy at Mayland — — — — 10,896,257 622,305 10,273,952 10,896,257 692,693
RICHMOND, VA 61,531,594 10,343,327 95,982,518 106,325,845 50,576,720 18,021,603 138,880,962 156,902,565 52,634,677
Beechwood — 1,409,377 6,086,677 7,496,054 2,052,996 1,691,278 7,857,772 9,549,050 3,560,316 1985 12/22/93
Steeplechase — 3,208,108 11,513,978 14,722,086 13,454,071 4,093,435 24,082,722 28,176,157 8,094,402 1990/97 03/07/96
Northwinds — 1,557,654 11,735,787 13,293,441 2,067,610 1,875,137 13,485,914 15,361,051 4,837,876 1989/97 08/15/96
Deerwood Crossings — 1,539,901 7,989,043 9,528,944 2,124,045 1,715,826 9,937,164 11,652,989 3,877,552 1973 08/15/96
Dutch Village — 1,197,593 4,826,266 6,023,859 1,555,262 1,312,239 6,266,882 7,579,121 2,531,503 1970 08/15/96
Lake Brandt — 1,546,950 13,489,466 15,036,416 1,418,731 1,857,767 14,597,379 16,455,147 5,222,300 1995 08/15/96
Park Forest — 679,671 5,770,413 6,450,084 1,833,426 970,920 7,312,589 8,283,510 2,372,182 1987 09/26/96
Deep River Pointe — 1,670,648 11,140,329 12,810,977 844,860 1,836,524 11,819,312 13,655,837 3,623,282 1997 10/01/97
GREENSBORO, NC — 12,809,902 72,551,959 85,361,861 25,351,001 15,353,127 95,359,735 110,712,862 34,119,414
Dominion Harris Pond — 886,788 6,728,097 7,614,885 2,411,470 1,292,902 8,733,453 10,026,355 3,696,584 1987 07/01/94
Dominion Mallard Creek — 698,860 6,488,061 7,186,921 1,950,035 728,374 8,408,582 9,136,956 3,050,931 1989 08/16/94
Dominion At Sharon — 667,368 4,856,103 5,523,471 1,797,222 970,559 6,350,133 7,320,693 2,467,435 1984 08/15/96

68

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

LANDSCAPE

UNITED DOMINION REALTY TRUST SCHEDULE III — REAL ESTATE OWNED FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005

Cost of Gross Amount at
Initial Costs Improvements Which Carried at Close of Period
Total Capitalized
Land and Buildings Initial Subsequent Land and Buildings Total
Land and Acquisition to Acquisition Land and Carrying Accumulated Date of Date
Property Encumbrances Improvements Improvements Costs (Net of Disposals) Improvements Improvements Value (A) Depreciation (B) Construction Acquired
Providence Court — — 22,047,803 22,047,803 10,919,273 7,634,765 25,332,311 32,967,076 9,050,790 1997 09/30/97
Dominion Crown Point — 2,122,179 22,338,577 24,460,756 3,813,162 3,971,293 24,302,625 28,273,918 10,932,380 1987/2000 07/01/94
Dominion Crossing — 1,666,312 4,774,020 6,440,332 479,761 1,666,398 5,253,695 6,920,093 454,238 1985 08/31/04
Dominion Norcroft — 1,968,664 13,051,238 15,019,902 563,625 1,979,077 13,604,449 15,583,526 1,142,781 1991/97 08/31/04
CHARLOTTE, NC — 8,010,171 80,283,899 88,294,070 21,934,547 18,243,370 91,985,247 110,228,617 30,795,140
Cape Harbor — 1,891,671 18,113,109 20,004,780 2,715,319 2,310,437 20,409,662 22,720,099 7,012,838 1996 08/15/96
Mill Creek — 1,404,498 4,489,398 5,893,896 15,103,701 1,979,446 19,018,150 20,997,597 7,115,288 1986/98 09/30/91
The Creek — 417,500 2,506,206 2,923,706 2,949,452 546,034 5,327,124 5,873,158 2,977,376 1973 06/30/92
Forest Hills — 1,028,000 5,420,478 6,448,478 3,988,083 1,219,115 9,217,446 10,436,561 4,644,726 1964/69 06/30/92
Clear Run — 874,830 8,740,602 9,615,432 7,010,480 1,341,941 15,283,971 16,625,912 6,223,558 1987/89 07/22/94
Crosswinds — 1,096,196 18,230,236 19,326,432 2,531,781 1,242,450 20,615,763 21,858,213 6,617,858 1990 02/28/97
WILMINGTON, NC — 6,712,695 57,500,029 64,212,724 34,298,815 8,639,424 89,872,116 98,511,539 34,591,644
Forest Lake At Oyster Point — 780,117 8,861,878 9,641,995 4,068,878 1,223,412 12,487,461 13,710,873 5,044,122 1986 08/15/95
Woodscape — 798,700 7,209,525 8,008,225 6,014,965 1,895,654 12,127,536 14,023,190 6,538,636 1974/76 12/29/87
Eastwind — 155,000 5,316,738 5,471,738 3,636,350 493,355 8,614,734 9,108,088 4,247,478 1970 04/04/88
Dominion
Waterside at Lynnhaven — 1,823,983 4,106,710 5,930,693 3,369,516 2,064,906 7,235,303 9,300,209 2,857,998 1966 08/15/96
Heather Lake — 616,800 3,400,672 4,017,472 6,658,926 1,088,260 9,588,138 10,676,398 6,084,003 1972/74 03/01/80
Dominion Yorkshire Downs 9,117,528 1,088,887 8,581,771 9,670,658 2,478,815 1,316,333 10,833,140 12,149,473 3,104,717 1987 12/23/97
NORFOLK, VA 9,117,528 5,263,487 37,477,294 42,740,781 26,227,450 8,081,920 60,886,311 68,968,231 27,876,953
Colony Village — 346,330 3,036,956 3,383,286 2,634,311 597,409 5,420,187 6,017,597 3,945,908 1972/74 12/31/84
Brynn Marr — 432,974 3,821,508 4,254,482 3,205,922 731,721 6,728,683 7,460,404 4,839,141 1973/77 12/31/84
Liberty Crossing — 840,000 3,873,139 4,713,139 4,076,267 1,540,137 7,249,269 8,789,406 5,061,739 1972/74 11/30/90
Bramblewood — 401,538 3,150,912 3,552,450 2,234,316 631,891 5,154,875 5,786,766 3,625,468 1980/82 12/31/84
Cumberland Trace — 632,281 7,895,674 8,527,955 2,210,837 742,110 9,996,682 10,738,792 3,458,082 1973 08/15/96
Village At Cliffdale 13,319,700 941,284 15,498,216 16,439,500 2,303,162 1,218,326 17,524,336 18,742,662 5,945,914 1992 08/15/96
Morganton Place — 819,090 13,217,086 14,036,176 1,101,917 895,716 14,242,376 15,138,093 4,580,293 1994 08/15/96
Woodberry — 388,699 6,380,899 6,769,598 1,715,755 1,009,255 7,476,098 8,485,353 3,040,343 1987 08/15/96
OTHER NORTH CAROLINA 13,319,700 4,802,196 56,874,390 61,676,586 19,482,487 7,366,566 73,792,507 81,159,073 34,496,890
Brittingham Square — 650,143 4,962,246 5,612,389 1,478,815 837,604 6,253,601 7,091,204 2,421,065 1991 05/04/95
Greens at Schumaker Pond — 709,559 6,117,582 6,827,141 2,226,841 919,231 8,134,752 9,053,982 3,050,332 1988 05/04/95
Greens at Cross Court — 1,182,414 4,544,012 5,726,426 2,235,144 1,403,696 6,557,874 7,961,570 2,517,177 1987 05/04/95
Greens at Hilton Run 16,770,382 2,754,447 10,482,579 13,237,026 3,580,418 3,127,309 13,690,135 16,817,444 5,155,165 1988 05/04/95
Dover Country — 2,007,878 6,365,053 8,372,931 4,344,090 2,384,744 10,332,277 12,717,021 4,635,012 1970 07/01/94
Greens At Cedar Chase — 1,528,667 4,830,738 6,359,405 1,199,533 1,729,307 5,829,631 7,558,938 2,404,961 1988 05/04/95
OTHER MID-ATLANTIC 16,770,382 8,833,108 37,302,210 46,135,318 15,064,841 10,401,890 50,798,269 61,200,159 20,183,712
Greens at Falls Run — 2,730,722 5,300,203 8,030,925 2,429,791 2,947,874 7,512,842 10,460,716 2,760,958 1989 05/04/95
Manor at England Run 19,462,000 3,194,527 13,505,239 16,699,766 14,271,592 4,958,881 26,012,478 30,971,358 9,866,718 1990 05/04/95
Greens at Hollymead — 965,114 5,250,374 6,215,488 1,240,357 1,100,699 6,355,146 7,455,845 2,510,755 1990 05/04/95
OTHER VIRGINIA 19,462,000 6,890,363 24,055,816 30,946,179 17,941,740 9,007,454 39,880,465 48,887,919 15,138,431
TOTAL MID-ATLANTIC REGION 227,930,543 166,365,967 912,483,924 1,078,849,891 297,626,852 257,614,390 1,118,862,352 1,376,476,743 384,617,107
WESTERN REGION
Pine Avenue — 2,158,423 8,887,744 11,046,167 4,248,781 2,857,568 12,437,380 15,294,948 3,022,136 1987 12/07/98
Grand Terrace — 2,144,340 6,594,615 8,738,955 1,635,202 2,259,958 8,114,199 10,374,157 2,354,278 1986 06/30/99
Windemere at Sycamore Highland — 5,809,490 23,450,119 29,259,609 406,018 5,815,647 23,849,980 29,665,627 4,518,565 2001 11/21/02
Harbor Greens — 20,476,466 28,537,805 49,014,271 7,108,916 20,482,155 35,641,032 56,123,187 5,099,246 1965 06/12/03
Pine Brook Village 18,270,000 2,581,763 25,504,086 28,085,849 3,697,355 3,793,142 27,990,063 31,783,204 4,017,816 1979 06/12/03
Pacific Shores 19,145,000 7,345,226 22,623,676 29,968,902 5,270,219 7,347,018 27,892,103 35,239,121 3,810,635 1971 06/12/03
Huntington Vista — 8,055,452 22,485,746 30,541,198 3,089,261 8,055,452 25,575,007 33,630,459 3,651,094 1970 06/12/03
Pacific Palms — 12,285,059 6,236,783 18,521,843 926,178 12,308,339 7,139,682 19,448,021 1,116,431 1962 07/31/03
Missions at Back Bay — 229,270 14,128,763 14,358,033 199,454 10,618,842 3,938,645 14,557,486 539,691 1969 12/16/03
Presidio at Rancho Del Oro 13,325,000 9,163,939 22,694,492 31,858,431 1,698,811 9,265,907 24,291,335 33,557,242 2,230,902 1987 06/25/04
Coronado at Newport — North 55,498,155 62,515,901 46,082,056 108,597,957 3,896,466 62,519,046 49,975,377 112,494,423 3,555,007 1968 10/28/04
Huntington Villas — 61,535,270 18,017,201 79,552,471 1,647,465 61,541,458 19,658,479 81,199,936 1,560,777 1972 09/30/04
Villa Venetia — 70,825,106 24,179,600 95,004,706 1,786,795 70,828,801 25,962,699 96,791,500 1,912,611 1972 10/28/04
The Crest 60,515,659 21,953,480 67,808,654 89,762,134 1,456,026 21,954,350 69,263,810 91,218,160 5,109,811 1989 09/30/04
Vista Del Rey — 10,670,493 7,079,834 17,750,327 509,512 10,670,512 7,589,327 18,259,839 586,484 1969 09/30/04
Foxborough — 12,070,601 6,186,721 18,257,322 897,406 12,076,129 7,078,599 19,154,728 538,375 1969 09/30/04
Villas at Carlsbad 9,472,903 6,516,636 10,717,601 17,234,237 571,493 6,516,636 11,289,094 17,805,730 781,680 1966 10/28/04

69

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

LANDSCAPE

UNITED DOMINION REALTY TRUST SCHEDULE III — REAL ESTATE OWNED FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005

Cost of Gross Amount at
Initial Costs Improvements Which Carried at Close of Period
Total Capitalized
Land and Buildings Initial Subsequent Land and Buildings Total
Land and Acquisition to Acquisition Land and Carrying Accumulated Date of Date
Property Encumbrances Improvements Improvements Costs (Net of Disposals) Improvements Improvements Value (A) Depreciation (B) Construction Acquired
Rosebeach — 8,414,478 17,449,593 25,864,072 483,267 8,414,478 17,932,861 26,347,339 1,341,572 1970 09/30/04
The Villas at San Dimas 13,069,635 8,180,619 16,735,364 24,915,983 451,401 8,180,619 17,186,765 25,367,384 1,209,848 1981 10/28/04
The Villas at Bonita 8,314,665 4,498,439 11,699,117 16,197,556 313,956 4,499,424 12,012,088 16,511,512 849,453 1981 10/28/04
Ocean Villa 9,912,557 5,134,982 12,788,885 17,923,867 429,140 5,134,982 13,218,025 18,353,007 917,962 1965 10/28/04
Waterstone at Murrieta — 10,597,865 34,702,760 45,300,625 1,261,303 10,597,865 35,964,063 46,561,928 2,550,103 1990 11/02/04
Summit at Mission Bay — 22,598,529 17,181,401 39,779,930 1,575,564 22,598,529 18,756,966 41,355,494 1,351,725 1953 11/01/04
Coronado South — 58,784,785 50,066,757 108,851,542 650,232 58,784,785 50,716,989 109,501,774 2,331,741 1970 03/31/05
The Arboretum 22,768,196 29,562,468 14,283,292 43,845,760 2,161,614 29,563,965 16,443,410 46,007,374 1,159,104 1970 10/28/04
Rancho Vallecitos — 3,302,967 10,877,286 14,180,253 1,916,363 3,498,434 12,598,183 16,096,616 5,230,480 1988 10/13/99
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 230,291,770 467,412,047 546,999,951 1,014,411,998 48,288,200 480,184,039 582,516,158 1,062,700,197 61,347,528
Foothills Tennis Village 15,851,700 3,617,507 14,542,028 18,159,535 3,899,508 3,806,188 18,252,855 22,059,043 4,394,898 1988 12/07/98
Woodlake Village 31,454,300 6,772,438 26,966,750 33,739,188 6,988,099 7,161,625 33,565,662 40,727,287 8,463,964 1979 12/07/98
2000 Post Street — 9,860,627 44,577,506 54,438,133 1,321,886 10,037,339 45,722,680 55,760,019 8,857,791 1987 12/07/98
Birch Creek 7,561,729 4,365,315 16,695,509 21,060,824 3,542,166 4,709,287 19,893,704 24,602,990 5,036,201 1968 12/07/98
Highlands of Marin — 5,995,838 24,868,350 30,864,188 1,592,849 6,150,835 26,306,203 32,457,037 5,918,324 1991 12/07/98
Marina Playa 12,486,738 6,224,383 23,916,283 30,140,666 4,317,585 6,518,063 27,940,188 34,458,251 7,199,190 1971 12/07/98
Crossroads — 4,811,488 10,169,520 14,981,008 674,295 4,835,724 10,819,578 15,655,303 939,332 1986 07/28/04
River Terrace — 22,161,247 40,547,515 62,708,762 80,209 22,161,397 40,627,574 62,788,971 1,012,097 2005 08/01/05
Lake Pines — 14,031,365 30,813,108 44,844,472 48,568 14,031,365 30,861,675 44,893,040 161,719 1972 11/29/05
Bay Terrace — 8,544,559 14,614,803 23,159,362 79,031 8,544,559 14,693,834 23,238,394 202,306 1962 10/07/05
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA 67,354,467 86,384,767 247,711,371 334,096,138 22,544,197 87,956,382 268,683,954 356,640,335 42,185,822
Arbor Terrace 12,862,690 1,453,342 11,994,972 13,448,314 1,349,701 1,565,777 13,232,237 14,798,015 3,988,470 1996 03/27/98
Aspen Creek — 1,177,714 9,115,789 10,293,503 774,784 1,327,649 9,740,639 11,068,287 2,464,521 1996 12/07/98
Crowne Pointe 8,640,800 2,486,252 6,437,256 8,923,508 1,897,342 2,589,065 8,231,785 10,820,850 2,478,935 1987 12/07/98
Hilltop 6,540,100 2,173,969 7,407,628 9,581,597 1,446,523 2,348,366 8,679,754 11,028,120 2,263,836 1985 12/07/98
Beaumont 13,583,200 2,339,132 12,559,224 14,898,356 1,015,988 2,456,550 13,457,795 15,914,344 5,379,787 1996 06/14/00
Stonehaven — 6,471,126 29,535,426 36,006,552 2,364,993 6,700,583 31,670,962 38,371,545 7,017,594 1989/90 05/28/02
The Hawthorne 26,825,490 6,473,970 30,500,720 36,974,690 114,787 6,475,086 30,614,391 37,089,477 830,468 2003 07/21/05
The Kennedy Building — 6,178,440 22,317,620 28,496,060 70,798 6,180,746 22,386,111 28,566,858 184,435 2005 11/10/05
SEATTLE, WA 68,452,280 28,753,945 129,868,635 158,622,580 9,034,916 29,643,822 138,013,674 167,657,496 24,608,047
Boronda Manor — 1,946,423 8,981,742 10,928,165 6,786,982 3,000,418 14,714,730 17,715,147 2,842,751 1979 12/07/98
Garden Court — 888,038 4,187,950 5,075,988 3,469,128 1,369,130 7,175,986 8,545,116 1,399,511 1973 12/07/98
Cambridge Court — 3,038,877 12,883,312 15,922,189 10,568,856 4,714,689 21,776,356 26,491,045 4,366,375 1974 12/07/98
Laurel Tree — 1,303,902 5,115,356 6,419,258 4,374,304 1,994,152 8,799,410 10,793,562 1,753,520 1977 12/07/98
The Pointe at Harden Ranch — 6,388,446 23,853,534 30,241,980 19,026,637 9,438,067 39,830,550 49,268,617 7,408,399 1986 12/07/98
The Pointe at Northridge — 2,043,736 8,028,443 10,072,179 6,767,092 3,107,993 13,731,277 16,839,271 2,633,433 1979 12/07/98
The Pointe at Westlake — 1,329,064 5,334,004 6,663,068 4,191,497 2,028,735 8,825,829 10,854,565 1,731,103 1975 12/07/98
MONTEREY PENINSULA, CA — 16,938,486 68,384,341 85,322,827 55,184,496 25,653,185 114,854,138 140,507,323 22,135,091
Lancaster Commons 8,570,300 2,485,291 7,451,165 9,936,456 730,253 2,553,632 8,113,076 10,666,709 2,359,445 1992 12/07/98
Tualatin Heights 9,220,000 3,272,585 9,134,089 12,406,674 1,276,665 3,441,883 10,241,456 13,683,339 2,971,205 1989 12/07/98
Evergreen Park — 3,878,138 9,973,051 13,851,189 1,745,562 4,061,970 11,534,781 15,596,751 3,345,800 1988 03/27/98
Andover Park — 2,916,576 16,994,580 19,911,155 490,885 2,943,565 17,458,475 20,402,040 1,347,087 1989 09/30/04
Hunt Club — 6,014,006 14,870,326 20,884,332 391,675 6,049,453 15,226,554 21,276,007 1,199,044 1985 09/30/04
PORTLAND, OR 17,790,300 18,566,596 58,423,211 76,989,807 4,635,039 19,050,504 62,574,342 81,624,846 11,222,580
TOTAL WESTERN REGION 383,888,817 618,055,841 1,051,387,508 1,669,443,349 139,686,848 642,487,932 1,166,642,265 1,809,130,197 161,499,068
SOUTHEASTERN REGION
Bay Cove — 2,928,847 6,578,257 9,507,104 7,097,576 3,542,795 13,061,885 16,604,680 6,767,252 1972 12/16/92
Summit West — 2,176,500 4,709,970 6,886,470 5,058,919 2,688,145 9,257,244 11,945,389 4,945,099 1972 12/16/92
Pinebrook — 1,780,375 2,458,172 4,238,547 4,887,880 2,080,046 7,046,382 9,126,427 4,216,408 1977 09/28/93
Lakewood Place 9,855,656 1,395,051 10,647,377 12,042,428 3,605,908 1,765,018 13,883,318 15,648,336 5,575,384 1986 03/10/94
Hunters Ridge 10,312,031 2,461,548 10,942,434 13,403,982 3,770,741 3,133,653 14,041,071 17,174,723 5,655,441 1992 06/30/95
Bay Meadow — 2,892,526 9,253,525 12,146,051 4,658,265 3,572,076 13,232,240 16,804,316 5,085,080 1985 12/09/96
Cambridge — 1,790,804 7,166,329 8,957,133 2,436,260 2,179,335 9,214,058 11,393,393 3,447,886 1985 06/06/97
Laurel Oaks — 1,361,553 6,541,980 7,903,533 2,538,839 1,640,637 8,801,735 10,442,372 3,133,963 1986 07/01/97
Island Walk — 8,446,075 31,350,185 39,796,260 7,485,979 9,470,997 37,811,241 47,282,239 9,255,687 1991 12/07/98
Sugar Mill Creek 9,107,000 2,241,880 7,552,520 9,794,400 2,089,869 2,420,028 9,464,242 11,884,269 2,533,096 1988 12/07/98
Inlet Bay — 7,701,679 23,149,670 30,851,349 3,904,987 7,823,325 26,933,011 34,756,336 4,294,661 1988/89 06/30/03
MacAlpine Place 32,474,234 10,869,386 36,857,512 47,726,898 645,703 10,875,525 37,497,076 48,372,601 2,546,194 2001 12/01/04
TAMPA, FL 61,748,921 46,046,224 157,207,931 203,254,155 48,180,926 51,191,578 200,243,502 251,435,081 57,456,151

70

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

LANDSCAPE

UNITED DOMINION REALTY TRUST SCHEDULE III — REAL ESTATE OWNED FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005

Cost of Gross Amount at
Initial Costs Improvements Which Carried at Close of Period
Total Capitalized
Land and Buildings Initial Subsequent Land and Buildings Total
Land and Acquisition to Acquisition Land and Carrying Accumulated Date of Date
Property Encumbrances Improvements Improvements Costs (Net of Disposals) Improvements Improvements Value (A) Depreciation (B) Construction Acquired
Fisherman’s Village — 2,387,368 7,458,897 9,846,265 5,240,486 3,280,304 11,806,448 15,086,751 5,631,076 1984 12/29/95
Seabrook — 1,845,853 4,155,275 6,001,128 4,451,370 2,342,339 8,110,159 10,452,498 4,283,055 1984 02/20/96
Dover Village — 2,894,702 6,456,100 9,350,802 5,246,095 3,459,772 11,137,125 14,596,897 6,285,412 1981 03/31/93
Lakeside North — 1,532,700 11,076,062 12,608,762 6,416,200 2,297,399 16,727,564 19,024,962 7,994,702 1984 04/14/94
Regatta Shore — 757,008 6,607,367 7,364,375 8,127,967 1,573,700 13,918,642 15,492,342 6,786,596 1988 06/30/94
Alafaya Woods 8,950,593 1,653,000 9,042,256 10,695,256 4,374,945 2,235,052 12,835,150 15,070,201 5,481,688 1988/90 10/21/94
Vinyards 7,920,000 1,840,230 11,571,625 13,411,855 5,311,383 2,665,622 16,057,617 18,723,238 7,246,599 1984/86 10/31/94
Andover Place 12,925,000 3,692,187 7,756,919 11,449,106 4,455,590 4,622,276 11,282,419 15,904,696 5,624,941 1988 09/29/95 & 09/30/96
Los Altos 12,134,612 2,803,805 12,348,464 15,152,269 4,080,504 3,519,625 15,713,148 19,232,773 6,137,430 1990 10/31/96
Lotus Landing — 2,184,723 8,638,664 10,823,387 3,602,105 2,442,815 11,982,676 14,425,492 3,828,172 1985 07/01/97
Seville On The Green — 1,282,616 6,498,062 7,780,678 3,955,393 1,574,921 10,161,150 11,736,071 3,213,602 1986 10/21/97
Arbors at Lee Vista 13,394,266 3,975,679 16,920,454 20,896,133 3,910,511 4,473,618 20,333,026 24,806,644 6,106,608 1991 12/31/97
Heron Lake — 1,446,553 9,287,878 10,734,431 3,455,489 1,633,813 12,556,107 14,189,920 3,552,080 1989 03/27/98
Ashton at Waterford 13,986,375 3,871,744 17,537,879 21,409,623 816,301 3,987,764 18,238,161 22,225,924 6,888,837 2000 05/28/98
ORLANDO, FL 69,310,846 32,168,168 135,355,902 167,524,070 63,444,340 40,109,020 190,859,390 230,968,410 79,060,796
Legacy Hill — 1,147,660 5,867,567 7,015,227 4,665,564 1,487,672 10,193,118 11,680,791 4,619,571 1977 11/06/95
Hickory Run — 1,468,727 11,583,786 13,052,513 3,161,700 1,892,764 14,321,449 16,214,213 5,563,167 1989 12/29/95
Carrington Hills 17,683,960 2,117,244 — 2,117,244 25,690,844 3,889,506 23,918,582 27,808,088 7,894,361 1999 12/06/95
Brookridge — 707,508 5,461,251 6,168,759 2,104,418 945,770 7,327,407 8,273,177 2,976,007 1986 03/28/96
Club at Hickory Hollow — 2,139,774 15,231,201 17,370,975 3,100,465 2,804,820 17,666,620 20,471,440 6,400,972 1987 02/21/97
Breckenridge — 766,428 7,713,862 8,480,290 1,631,146 992,549 9,118,887 10,111,436 3,064,351 1986 03/27/97
Williamsburg — 1,376,190 10,931,309 12,307,499 2,135,780 1,665,463 12,777,817 14,443,279 4,141,614 1986 05/20/98
Colonnade 11,292,100 1,459,754 16,014,857 17,474,611 1,185,285 1,686,284 16,973,612 18,659,896 4,473,308 1998 01/07/99
The Preserve at Brentwood — 3,181,524 24,674,264 27,855,788 1,202,666 3,182,047 25,876,407 29,058,454 2,569,478 1998 06/01/04
NASHVILLE, TN 28,976,060 14,364,809 97,478,097 111,842,906 44,877,868 18,546,875 138,173,899 156,720,774 41,702,829
Greentree — 1,634,330 11,226,990 12,861,320 6,290,517 2,469,872 16,681,965 19,151,837 7,617,668 1986 07/22/94
Westland — 1,834,535 14,864,742 16,699,277 6,201,004 2,749,764 20,150,516 22,900,281 8,525,876 1990 05/09/96
Antlers — 4,034,039 11,192,842 15,226,881 7,881,166 5,021,183 18,086,864 23,108,047 8,237,422 1985 05/28/96
St.
John’s Plantation — 4,288,214 33,320,388 37,608,602 508,541 4,288,214 33,828,929 38,117,143 1,029,640 1989 06/30/05
JACKSONVILLE, FL — 11,791,118 70,604,962 82,396,080 20,881,228 14,529,034 88,748,274 103,277,308 25,410,605
Stanford Village — 884,500 2,807,839 3,692,339 1,719,656 1,205,252 4,206,742 5,411,995 2,845,335 1985 09/26/89
Griffin Crossing — 1,509,633 7,544,018 9,053,651 2,434,940 1,887,112 9,601,478 11,488,591 4,487,014 1987/89 06/08/94
Gwinnett Square 6,384,352 1,924,325 7,376,454 9,300,779 2,922,554 2,233,488 9,989,846 12,223,333 4,178,804 1985 03/29/95
Dunwoody Pointe 6,123,700 2,763,324 6,902,996 9,666,320 6,453,088 3,455,697 12,663,711 16,119,408 6,535,332 1980 10/24/95
Riverwood 6,050,000 2,985,599 11,087,903 14,073,502 5,271,345 3,508,441 15,836,406 19,344,847 7,322,929 1980 06/26/96
Waterford Place — 1,579,478 10,302,679 11,882,157 1,645,626 1,716,769 11,811,014 13,527,783 3,241,264 1985 04/15/98
ATLANTA, GA 18,558,052 11,646,859 46,021,889 57,668,748 20,447,208 14,006,759 64,109,197 78,115,956 28,610,677
Gable Hill — 824,847 5,307,194 6,132,041 2,056,722 1,201,961 6,986,802 8,188,763 4,003,897 1985 12/04/89
St. Andrews Commons — 1,428,826 9,371,378 10,800,204 2,938,014 2,037,918 11,700,301 13,738,218 5,717,327 1986 05/20/93
Forestbrook — 395,516 2,902,040 3,297,556 2,212,233 597,465 4,912,323 5,509,789 3,174,993 1974 07/01/93
Waterford — 957,980 6,947,939 7,905,919 2,703,770 1,332,380 9,277,309 10,609,689 4,068,515 1985 07/01/94
Hampton Greene — 1,363,046 10,118,453 11,481,499 2,318,609 2,026,860 11,773,248 13,800,108 5,155,351 1990 08/19/94
Rivergate — 1,122,500 12,055,625 13,178,125 2,885,879 1,503,300 14,560,704 16,064,004 4,962,097 1989 08/15/96
COLUMBIA, SC — 6,092,715 46,702,629 52,795,344 15,115,227 8,699,885 59,210,687 67,910,571 27,082,179
Mallards of Wedgewood — 959,284 6,864,666 7,823,950 2,835,350 1,267,652 9,391,649 10,659,300 4,014,918 1985 07/27/95
Riverbridge 44,873,487 15,968,090 56,400,716 72,368,806 1,103,059 15,971,280 57,500,585 73,471,865 3,765,471 1999/2001 12/01/04
The Groves — 789,953 4,767,055 5,557,008 3,008,510 1,508,555 7,056,962 8,565,518 3,163,467 1989 12/13/95
Mallards of Brandywine — 765,949 5,407,683 6,173,632 1,826,871 996,812 7,003,692 8,000,503 2,675,747 1985 07/01/97
LakePointe — 1,434,450 4,940,166 6,374,616 3,952,896 1,843,711 8,483,801 10,327,512 4,252,549 1984 09/24/93
Lakeside — 3,373,265 4,583,677 7,956,942 2,076 3,373,265 4,585,754 7,959,018 7,584 1985 12/29/05
OTHER FLORIDA 44,873,487 23,290,991 82,963,963 106,254,954 12,728,762 24,961,274 94,022,442 118,983,716 17,879,736
Patriot Place — 212,500 1,600,757 1,813,257 6,091,516 1,516,329 6,388,444 7,904,773 4,759,768 1974 10/23/85
The Trails at Mount Moriah — 5,930,816 22,094,751 28,025,567 5,679,201 6,587,342 27,117,427 33,704,768 8,383,676 1990 01/09/98
OTHER SOUTHEASTERN — 6,143,316 23,695,508 29,838,824 11,770,717 8,103,671 33,505,870 41,609,541 13,143,445
TOTAL SOUTHEASTERN REGION 223,467,366 151,544,200 660,030,881 811,575,081 237,446,276 180,148,096 868,873,262 1,049,021,358 290,346,419
SOUTHWESTERN REGION

71

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

LANDSCAPE

UNITED DOMINION REALTY TRUST SCHEDULE III — REAL ESTATE OWNED FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005

Cost of
Initial Costs Improvements Which Carried at Close of Period
Total Capitalized
Land and Buildings Initial Subsequent Land and Buildings Total
Land and Acquisition to Acquisition Land and Carrying Accumulated Date of Date
Property Encumbrances Improvements Improvements Costs (Net of Disposals) Improvements Improvements Value (A) Depreciation (B) Construction Acquired
Woodtrail — 1,543,000 5,457,000 7,000,000 3,216,199 1,786,784 8,429,414 10,216,199 3,873,883 1978 12/31/96
Green Oaks — 5,313,920 19,626,181 24,940,101 5,804,076 6,136,571 24,607,606 30,744,177 8,513,754 1985 06/25/97
Sky Hawk — 2,297,741 7,157,965 9,455,706 2,890,390 2,815,773 9,530,322 12,346,096 3,938,390 1984 05/08/97
South Grand at Pecan Grove — 4,058,090 14,755,809 18,813,899 8,071,277 5,036,823 21,848,353 26,885,176 7,889,074 1985 09/26/97
Braesridge 12,361,700 3,048,212 10,961,749 14,009,961 3,391,006 3,589,476 13,811,491 17,400,967 4,880,233 1982 09/26/97
Skylar Pointe — 3,604,483 11,592,432 15,196,915 5,661,263 3,828,771 17,029,408 20,858,178 6,823,784 1979 11/20/97
Stone Canyon — 899,515 — 899,515 9,666,559 1,333,651 9,232,422 10,566,074 2,821,750 1998 12/17/97
Chelsea Park 5,737,800 1,991,478 5,787,626 7,779,104 2,777,460 2,487,334 8,069,230 10,556,564 3,046,647 1983 03/27/98
Country Club Place 5,005,200 498,632 6,520,172 7,018,804 1,689,454 720,952 7,987,306 8,708,258 2,639,222 1985 03/27/98
Arbor Ridge — 1,688,948 6,684,229 8,373,177 1,032,378 2,128,817 7,276,738 9,405,555 2,736,015 1983 03/27/98
London Park — 2,018,478 6,667,450 8,685,928 2,848,867 2,552,445 8,982,350 11,534,795 3,453,294 1983 03/27/98
Marymont — 1,150,669 4,155,411 5,306,080 1,405,359 1,193,462 5,517,977 6,711,439 1,643,175 1983 03/27/98
Riviera Pines — 1,413,851 6,453,847 7,867,698 1,946,742 1,502,364 8,312,076 9,814,440 2,220,737 1979 03/27/98
Towne Lake — 1,333,958 5,308,884 6,642,842 2,287,407 1,737,352 7,192,897 8,930,249 2,700,965 1984 03/27/98
The Legend at Park 10 — 1,995,011 — 1,995,011 11,989,145 3,864,976 10,119,181 13,984,156 4,774,986 1998 05/19/98
The Bradford 16,498,944 1,151,180 40,829,514 41,980,694 2,765,258 6,623,188 38,122,765 44,745,952 5,238,174 1990/91 11/20/03
HOUSTON, TX 39,603,644 34,007,166 151,958,269 185,965,435 67,442,840 47,338,739 206,069,536 253,408,275 67,194,084
Autumnwood — 2,412,180 8,687,820 11,100,000 2,373,588 2,809,344 10,664,244 13,473,588 3,944,912 1984 12/31/96
Cobblestone — 2,925,372 10,527,738 13,453,110 4,382,497 3,347,912 14,487,695 17,835,607 5,522,986 1984 12/31/96
Summit Ridge 6,456,400 1,725,508 6,308,032 8,033,540 2,637,265 2,320,264 8,350,541 10,670,805 3,016,710 1983 03/27/98
Greenwood Creek — 1,958,378 8,551,018 10,509,396 2,947,248 2,339,302 11,117,342 13,456,644 3,604,729 1984 03/27/98
Derby Park 8,818,600 3,121,153 11,764,974 14,886,127 2,805,619 3,811,885 13,879,861 17,691,746 5,050,391 1984 03/27/98
Aspen Court 3,099,900 776,587 4,944,947 5,721,534 1,669,751 1,168,152 6,223,133 7,391,285 2,152,258 1986 03/27/98
The Cliffs — 3,483,876 18,657,051 22,140,927 2,135,771 3,840,227 20,436,471 24,276,698 5,377,326 1992 01/29/02
ARLINGTON, TX 18,374,900 16,403,054 69,441,580 85,844,634 18,951,740 19,637,086 85,159,287 104,796,374 28,669,312
Greensview — 6,450,216 24,405,137 30,855,353 2,669,358 6,066,831 27,457,879 33,524,711 8,320,439 1987/2002 12/07/98
Mountain View — 6,401,851 21,569,403 27,971,254 3,497,600 6,387,939 25,080,915 31,468,854 6,895,396 1973 12/07/98
The Reflections — 6,305,326 27,201,579 33,506,905 1,641,491 6,534,151 28,614,245 35,148,396 6,710,791 1981/96 04/30/02
DENVER, CO — 19,157,393 73,176,119 92,333,512 7,808,448 18,988,921 81,153,039 100,141,960 21,926,626
Vista Point — 1,587,400 5,612,600 7,200,000 1,966,000 1,823,509 7,342,491 9,166,000 2,840,743 1986 12/31/96
Sierra Palms 14,945,588 4,638,950 17,361,050 22,000,000 1,108,221 4,822,937 18,285,284 23,108,221 5,792,797 1996 12/31/96
Finisterra — 1,273,798 26,392,207 27,666,005 1,373,300 1,411,829 27,627,476 29,039,305 7,464,413 1997 03/27/98
Sierra Foothills 14,031,553 2,728,172 — 2,728,172 19,206,215 4,882,732 17,051,655 21,934,387 8,147,644 1998 02/18/98
Sierra Canyon 8,104,100 1,809,864 12,963,581 14,773,444 521,384 1,870,350 13,424,479 15,294,828 3,597,072 2001 12/28/01
PHOENIX, AZ 37,081,241 12,038,184 62,329,438 74,367,621 24,175,120 14,811,357 83,731,385 98,542,742 27,842,669
Summergate — 1,171,300 3,928,700 5,100,000 1,307,129 1,432,497 4,974,632 6,407,129 1,969,003 1984 12/31/96
Highlands of Preston — 2,151,056 8,167,630 10,318,686 2,836,789 2,557,570 10,597,904 13,155,475 3,576,398 1985 03/27/98
Meridian 23,970,724 6,012,806 29,094,168 35,106,974 1,660,017 6,440,129 30,326,862 36,766,991 8,429,794 2000/02 1/27/98 & 12/28/01
Lincoln Towne Square 28,000,000 7,541,141 31,484,858 39,025,999 852,083 7,546,164 32,331,918 39,878,082 3,741,085 1999 03/12/04
DALLAS, TX 51,970,724 16,876,303 72,675,356 89,551,659 6,656,017 17,976,360 78,231,316 96,207,676 17,716,280
Pecan Grove — 1,406,750 5,293,250 6,700,000 1,378,860 1,487,178 6,591,682 8,078,860 2,016,109 1984 12/31/96
Anderson Mill 6,072,561 3,134,669 11,170,376 14,305,045 4,355,990 3,554,049 15,106,986 18,661,035 6,695,640 1984 03/27/97
Red Stone Ranch — 1,896,723 17,525,536 19,422,259 548,484 5,393,898 14,576,845 19,970,743 5,840,232 2000 06/14/00
Barton Creek Landing — 3,150,998 14,269,086 17,420,084 1,187,298 3,187,081 15,420,301 18,607,382 3,673,370 1986 03/28/02
Lakeline Villas — 4,633,398 13,297,860 17,931,258 234,284 4,633,454 13,532,088 18,165,542 1,348,673 2002 07/15/04
AUSTIN, TX 6,072,561 14,222,538 61,556,108 75,778,646 7,704,916 18,255,660 65,227,902 83,483,562 19,574,024
Oak Park 18,278,466 3,966,129 22,227,701 26,193,830 1,702,837 5,701,753 22,194,914 27,896,667 8,800,874 1982/98 12/31/96
Catalina — 1,543,321 5,631,679 7,175,000 1,606,557 1,760,097 7,021,461 8,781,557 2,513,996 1982 12/31/96
Wimbledon Court — 1,809,183 10,930,306 12,739,489 3,156,365 2,923,748 12,972,106 15,895,854 4,456,626 1983 12/31/96
Oak Forest 23,395,160 5,630,740 23,293,922 28,924,662 11,882,036 6,602,836 34,203,862 40,806,698 13,047,020 1996/98 12/31/96
Oaks of Lewisville 11,884,206 3,726,795 13,563,181 17,289,976 5,368,205 4,618,214 18,039,968 22,658,181 7,240,586 1983 03/27/97
Parc Plaza — 1,683,531 5,279,123 6,962,654 2,283,169 2,254,565 6,991,258 9,245,823 2,976,568 1986 10/30/97
Mandolin — 4,222,640 27,909,437 32,132,077 4,584,407 6,401,642 30,314,842 36,716,484 7,582,342 2001 12/28/01
Inn at Los Patios — 3,005,300 11,544,700 14,550,000 (1,490,425 ) 3,005,300 10,054,275 13,059,575 2,396,606 1990 08/15/98
Turtle Creek — 1,913,177 7,086,823 9,000,000 2,090,290 2,283,999 8,806,291 11,090,290 3,130,326 1985 12/31/96
Shadow Lake — 2,523,670 8,976,330 11,500,000 3,329,195 2,955,682 11,873,513 14,829,195 4,257,609 1984 12/31/96
OTHER SOUTHWESTERN 53,557,832 30,024,486 136,443,202 166,467,688 34,512,637 38,507,835 162,472,490 200,980,325 56,402,552
TOTAL SOUTHWESTERN REGION 206,660,902 142,729,124 627,580,073 770,309,196 167,251,717 175,515,959 762,044,955 937,560,914 239,325,547

72

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

LANDSCAPE

UNITED DOMINION REALTY TRUST SCHEDULE III — REAL ESTATE OWNED FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005

Cost of Gross Amount at
Initial Costs Improvements Which Carried at Close of Period
Total Capitalized
Land and Buildings Initial Subsequent Land and Buildings Total
Land and Acquisition to Acquisition Land and Carrying Accumulated Date of Date
Property Encumbrances Improvements Improvements Costs (Net of Disposals) Improvements Improvements Value (A) Depreciation (B) Construction Acquired
MIDWESTERN REGION
Sycamore Ridge — 4,067,900 15,433,285 19,501,185 2,880,987 4,392,526 17,989,645 22,382,172 4,798,033 1997 07/02/98
Heritage Green — 2,990,199 11,391,797 14,381,996 10,047,897 3,259,776 21,170,116 24,429,893 6,021,964 1998 07/02/98
Alexander Court 11,770,120 1,573,412 — 1,573,412 21,866,129 6,305,483 17,134,058 23,439,541 7,184,446 1999 07/02/98
Governour’s Square 27,507,483 7,512,513 28,695,050 36,207,563 6,643,191 8,080,536 34,770,218 42,850,754 9,487,577 1967 12/07/98
Hickory Creek — 3,421,413 13,539,402 16,960,815 3,829,210 3,805,819 16,984,207 20,790,025 4,442,530 1988 12/07/98
Britton Woods — 3,476,851 19,213,411 22,690,262 3,510,780 4,209,922 21,991,120 26,201,042 8,081,231 1991 04/20/01
COLUMBUS, OH 39,277,603 23,042,288 88,272,945 111,315,233 48,778,194 30,054,063 130,039,364 160,093,427 40,015,780
Washington Park — 2,011,520 7,565,279 9,576,799 1,399,256 2,158,441 8,817,613 10,976,055 2,529,500 1998 12/07/98
Fountainhead — 390,542 1,420,166 1,810,708 432,682 406,183 1,837,207 2,243,390 595,292 1966 12/07/98
Jamestown of Toledo 5,984,700 1,800,271 7,053,585 8,853,856 1,906,768 1,962,901 8,797,724 10,760,624 2,595,483 1965 12/07/98
OTHER MIDWESTERN 5,984,700 4,202,333 16,039,030 20,241,363 3,738,706 4,527,525 19,452,544 23,980,069 5,720,276
TOTAL MIDWESTERN REGION 45,262,303 27,244,621 104,311,975 131,556,596 52,516,900 34,581,588 149,491,908 184,073,496 45,736,056
TOTAL APARTMENTS $ 1,087,209,931 $ 1,105,939,752 $ 3,355,794,361 $ 4,461,734,113 $ 894,528,594 $ 1,290,347,965 $ 4,065,914,742 $ 5,356,262,707 $ 1,121,524,197
REAL ESTATE HELD FOR DISPOSITION
Apartments
Montgomery Chase $ — $ 6,802,519 $ 14,427,386 $ 21,229,905 $ (18,339,918 ) $ 7,469,801 $ (4,579,814 ) $ 2,889,986 $ (9,727 ) 1983 01/04/05
Belcara at McCormick Ranch — 1,999,645 5,655,296 7,654,941 2,682,310 2,199,482 8,137,770 10,337,252 30,874 1980 01/31/05
University Park — 3,079,034 7,256,292 10,335,326 (2,860,918 ) 3,121,973 4,352,435 7,474,408 22,845 1980 02/11/05
The Gallery at Bayport — 1,732,280 6,332,455 8,064,735 436,496 1,818,294 6,682,938 8,501,232 34,104 1991 07/21/05
Total Apartments — 13,613,478 33,671,429 47,284,907 (18,082,030 ) 14,609,550 14,593,328 29,202,877 78,096
Land
Fossil Creek — 3,932,115 — 3,932,115 91,483 3,683,156 340,442 4,023,598 —
Hanover Village — 1,623,910 — 1,623,910 5 1,103,600 520,315 1,623,915 491,869
Total Held for Disposition $ — $ 19,169,503 $ 33,671,429 $ 52,840,932 $ (17,990,542 ) $ 19,396,306 $ 15,454,084 $ 34,850,390 $ 569,964
REAL ESTATE UNDER DEVELOPMENT
Apartments
2000 Post III $ — $ 1,755,643 $ 779,735 $ 2,535,378 $ 2,299,574 $ 1,755,643 $ 3,079,309 $ 4,834,952 $ —
Verano at Town Square 25,325,194 13,557,235 3,645,406 17,202,641 38,450,206 17,272,015 38,380,832 55,652,847 140,437
Manadaly on the Lake — 6,222,578 16,992,320 23,214,898 3,124,019 3,124,019 23,214,898 26,338,917 —
Ridgeview
Phase I — 2,341,936 — 2,341,936 240,024 1,789,978 791,982 2,581,960 —
Ridgeview
Phase II — 1,918,411 — 1,918,411 32,836 1,469,609 481,638 1,951,247 —
Ridgeview Townhomes — 2,349,923 — 2,349,923 — 2,349,923 — 2,349,923 —
Lincoln
Towne Square Phase II — 2,951,277 — 2,951,277 55,510 2,939,593 67,193 3,006,787 —
Total Apartments 25,325,194 31,097,003 21,417,461 52,514,464 44,202,169 30,700,781 66,015,852 96,716,632 140,437
Land
Mountain View Phase II — 220,000 — 220,000 — 220,000 — 220,000 —
Presidio — 1,523,922 — 1,523,922 — 1,523,922 — 1,523,922 —
UDR/ Pacific Los Alisos, LP — 17,297,661 — 17,297,661 — 17,297,661 — 17,297,661 —
Parkers Landing II — 1,709,606 — 1,709,606 — 1,709,606 — 1,709,606 —
Total Land — 20,751,189 — 20,751,189 — 20,751,189 — 20,751,189 —
Total Real Estate Under Development $ 25,325,194 $ 51,848,192 $ 21,417,461 $ 73,265,653 $ 44,202,169 $ 51,451,970 $ 66,015,852 $ 117,467,822 $ 140,437
Commercial Held for Investment
The Calvert $ — $ 34,128 $ 1,597,359 $ 1,631,486 $ 153 $ 326,899 $ 1,304,741 $ 1,631,639 $ 159,691 1962 11/26/03
Commercial Properties — 34,128 1,597,359 1,631,486 153 326,899 1,304,741 1,631,639 159,691
Richmond Corporate 3,724,034 245,332 6,351,847 $ 6,597,179 (4,207,447 ) 277,225 1,934,307 2,211,532 1,434,792
Commercial & Corporate $ 3,724,034 $ 279,460 $ 7,949,206 $ 8,228,665 $ (4,207,294 ) $ 604,124 $ 3,239,048 $ 3,843,171 $ 1,594,483
TOTAL REAL ESTATE OWNED $ 1,116,259,159 $ 1,177,236,907 $ 3,418,832,457 $ 4,596,069,364 $ 916,532,926 $ 1,361,800,364 $ 4,150,623,726 $ 5,512,424,090 $ 1,123,829,081
(A) The aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes was approximately $4.9 billion at December 31, 2005.
(B) The depreciable life for all buildings is 35 years.

73

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

The exhibits listed below are filed as part of this Report. References under the caption “Location” to exhibits or other filings indicate that the exhibit or other filing has been filed, that the indexed exhibit and the exhibit referred to are the same and that the exhibit referred to is incorporated by reference. Management contracts and compensatory plans or arrangements filed as exhibits to this Report are identified by an asterisk. The Commission file number for our Exchange Act filings referenced below is 1-10524.

Exhibit Description Location
2.01 Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of
December 19, 1997, between the
Company, ASR Investment Corporation
and ASR Acquisition Sub, Inc. Exhibit 2(a) to the
Company’s Form S-4
Registration
Statement
(Registration No.
333-45305) filed
with the Commission
on January 30, 1998.
2.02 Agreement of Plan of Merger dated as of
September 10, 1998, between the
Company and American Apartment
Communities II, Inc. including as
exhibits thereto the proposed terms of
the Series D Preferred Stock and the
proposed form of Investment Agreement
between the Company, United Dominion
Realty, L.P., American Apartment
Communities II, Inc., American
Apartment Communities Operating
Partnership, L.P., Schnitzer Investment
Corp., AAC Management LLC and LF
Strategic Realty Investors, L.P. Exhibit 2(c) to the
Company’s Form S-3
Registration
Statement
(Registration No.
333-64281) filed
with the Commission
on September 25,
1998.
2.03 Partnership Interest Purchase and
Exchange Agreement dated as of
September 10, 1998, between the
Company, United Dominion Realty, L.P.,
American Apartment Communities
Operating Partnership, L.P., AAC
Management LLC, Schnitzer Investment
Corp., Fox Point Ltd. and James D.
Klingbeil including as an exhibit
thereto the proposed form of the Third
Amended and Restated Limited
Partnership Agreement of United
Dominion Realty, L.P. Exhibit 2(d) to the
Company’s Form S-3
Registration
Statement
(Registration No.
333-64281) filed
with the Commission
on September 25,
1998.
2.04 Articles of Merger between the Company
and United Dominion Realty Trust, Inc.,
a Virginia corporation, filed with the
State Department of Assessments and
Taxation of the State of Maryland. Exhibit 2.01 to the
Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K
dated and filed with
the Commission on
June 11, 2003.
2.05 Certificate of Correction to Articles
of Merger between the Company and
United Dominion Realty Trust, Inc., a
Virginia corporation, filed with the
State Department of Assessments and
Taxation of the State of Maryland on
March 21, 2005. Exhibit 2.02 to the
Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K
dated March 17, 2005
and filed with the
Commission on March
22, 2005.

74

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Exhibit Description Location
2.06 Certificate of Correction to Articles
of Merger between the Company and
United Dominion Realty Trust, Inc., a
Virginia corporation, filed with the
State Department of Assessments and
Taxation of the State of Maryland on
July 27, 2005. Exhibit 2.03 to the
Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K
dated July 27, 2005
and filed with the
Commission on August
1, 2005.
2.07 Articles of Merger between the Company
and United Dominion Realty Trust, Inc.,
a Virginia corporation, filed with the
State Corporation Commission of the
Commonwealth of Virginia. Exhibit 2.02 to the
Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K
dated and filed with
the Commission on
June 11, 2003.
2.08 Agreement of Purchase and Sale dated as
of August 13, 2004, by and between
United Dominion Realty, L.P., a
Delaware limited partnership, as Buyer,
and Essex The Crest, L.P., a California
limited partnership, Essex El Encanto
Apartments, L.P., a California limited
partnership, Essex Hunt Club
Apartments, L.P., a California limited
partnership, and the other signatories
named as Sellers therein. Exhibit 2.1 to the
Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K
dated September 28,
2004 and filed with
the Commission on
September 29, 2004.
2.09 First Amendment to Agreement of
Purchase and Sale dated as of September
29, 2004, by and between United
Dominion Realty, L.P., a Delaware
limited partnership, as Buyer, and
Essex The Crest, L.P., a California
limited partnership, Essex El Encanto
Apartments, L.P., a California limited
partnership, Essex Hunt Club
Apartments, L.P., a California limited
partnership, and the other signatories
named as Sellers therein. Exhibit 2.2 to the
Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K
dated September 29,
2004 and filed with
the Commission on
October 5, 2004.
2.10 Second Amendment to Agreement of
Purchase and Sale dated as of October
26, 2004, by and between United
Dominion Realty, L.P., a Delaware
limited partnership, as Buyer, and
Essex The Crest, L.P., a California
limited partnership, Essex El Encanto
Apartments, L.P., a California limited
partnership, Essex Hunt Club
Apartments, L.P., a California limited
partnership, and the other signatories
named as Sellers therein. Exhibit 2.3 to the
Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K/A
dated September 29,
2004 and filed with
the Commission on
November 1, 2004.
3.01 Articles of Restatement. Exhibit 3.09 to the
Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K
dated July 27, 2005
and filed with the
Commission on August
1, 2005.
3.02 Amended and Restated Bylaws (as amended
through February 9, 2006). Filed herewith.

75

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Exhibit Description Location
4.01 Form of Common Stock Certificate. Exhibit 4.1 to the
Company’s
Registration
Statement on Form
8-A/A dated and
filed with the
Commission on
November 7, 2005.
4.02 Form of Certificate for Shares of 8.60%
Series B Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Stock. Exhibit I(e) to the
Company’s Form 8-A
Registration
Statement dated June
10, 1997 and filed
with the Commission
on June 11, 1997.
4.03 Form of Rights Certificate. Exhibit 4(e) to the
Company’s
Registration
Statement on Form
8-A dated and filed
with the Commission
on February 4, 1998.
4.04 First Amended and Restated Rights
Agreement dated as of September 14,
1999, between the Company and
the Rights Agent. Exhibit 4(i)(d)(A)
to the Company’s
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended
September 30, 1999.
4.05 Note Purchase Agreement dated as of
February 15, 1993, between the Company
and CIGNA Property the Company and
CIGNA Property and Casualty Insurance
Company, Connecticut General Life
Insurance Company, on behalf of one or
more separate accounts, Insurance
Company of North America, Principal
Mutual Life Insurance Company and Aid
Association for Lutherans. Exhibit 6(c)(5) to
the Company’s Form
8-A Registration
Statement dated
April 19, 1990.
4.06 Senior Indenture dated as of November
1, 1995. Exhibit 4(ii)(h)(1)
to the Company’s
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June
30, 1996.
4.07 Supplemental Indenture dated as of June
11, 2003. Exhibit 4.03 to the
Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K
dated June 17, 2004
and filed with the
Commission on June
18, 2004.
4.08 Subordinated Indenture dated as of
August 1, 1994. Exhibit 4(i)(m) to
the Company’s Form
S-3 Registration
Statement
(Registration No.
33-64725) filed with
the Commission on
November 15, 1995.
4.09 Indenture dated December 19, 2005
between the Company and SunTrust Bank,
as Trustee, relating to the Company’s
4.00% Convertible Senior Notes due
2035, including the form note. Exhibit 10.1 to the
Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K
dated December 13,
2005 and filed with
the Commission on
December 19, 2005.
4.10 Form of Senior Debt Security. Exhibit 4(i)(n) to
the Company’s Form
S-3 Registration
Statement
(Registration No.
33-64725) filed with
the Commission on
November 15, 1995.

76

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Exhibit Description Location
4.11 Form of Subordinated Debt Security. Exhibit 4(i)(o) to
the Company’s Form
S-3 Registration
Statement
(Registration No.
33-55159) filed with
the Commission on
August 19, 1994.
4.12 Form of Fixed Rate Medium-Term Note. Exhibit 4.01 to the
Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K
dated June 17, 2004
and filed with the
Commission on June
18, 2004.
4.13 Form of Floating Rate Medium-Term Note. Exhibit 4.02 to the
Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K
dated June 17, 2004
and filed with the
Commission on June
18, 2004.
4.14 6.50% Notes due 2009. Exhibit 4 to the
Company’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter
ended June 30, 2002.
4.15 4.50% Medium-Term Notes due March 2008. Exhibit 4.13 to the
Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended
December 31, 2002,
and Exhibit 4.1 to
the Company’s
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended
September 30, 2003.
4.16 5.13% Medium-Term Note due January 2014. Exhibit 4.2 to the
Company’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter
ended September 30,
2003, and Exhibits
4.1 and 4.2 to the
Company’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter
ended March 31,
2004.
4.17 4.25% Medium-Term Note due January 2009. Exhibit 4.15 to the
Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended
December 31, 2003.
4.18 4.30% Medium-Term Note due July 2007. Exhibit 4.1 to the
Company’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter
ended June 30, 2004.
4.19 3.90% Medium-Term Note due March 2010. Exhibit 4.3 to the
Company’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter
ended March 31,
2004.
4.20 5.00% Medium-Term Notes due January
2012. Exhibit 4.19 to the
Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended
December 31, 2004.
4.21 4.30% Medium-Term Note due July 2007. Exhibit 4.20 to the
Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended
December 31, 2004.
4.22 5.25% Medium-Term Note due January
2015, issued November 1, 2004. Exhibit 4.21 to the
Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended
December 31, 2004.
4.23 5.25% Medium-Term Note due January
2015, issued February 14, 2005. Exhibit 4.22 to the
Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended
December 31, 2004.
4.24 5.25% Medium-Term Note due January
2015, issued March 8, 2005. Exhibit 4.23 to the
Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended
December 31, 2004.
4.25 5.25% Medium-Term Note due January
2015, issued May 3, 2005. Exhibit 4.3 to the
Company’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter
ended March 31,
2005.

77

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Exhibit Description Location
4.26 5.25% Medium-Term Note due January
2016, issued September 7, 2005 Exhibit 4.1 to the
Company’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30,
2005.
4.27 Registration Rights Agreement dated
June 12, 2003 between the Company and
the holders of the Series E Cumulative
Convertible Preferred Stock. Exhibit 4.5 to the
Company’s Form S-3
Registration
Statement
(Registration No.
333-106959) filed
with the Commission
on October 20, 2003.
4.28 Registration Rights Agreement dated
June 12, 2003 by and among the Company
and the Initial Holders of OP Units. Exhibit 4.3 to the
Company’s Form S-3
Registration
Statement
(Registration No.
333-116804) filed
with the Commission
on October 19, 2004.
10.01* 1985 Stock Option Plan, as amended. Exhibit 10(iv) to
the Company’s
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June
30, 1998.
10.02* 1991 Stock Purchase and Loan Plan. Exhibit 10(viii) to
the Company’s
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March
31, 1997.
10.03 Subordination Agreement dated April 16,
1998, between the Company and United
Dominion Realty, L.P. Exhibit 10(vi)(a) to
the Company’s
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March
31, 1998.
10.04 Servicing and Purchase Agreement dated
as of June 24, 1999, including as an
exhibit thereto the Note and
Participation Agreement forms. Exhibit 10(vii) to
the Company’s
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June
30, 1999.
10.05* Form of Restricted Stock Awards. Exhibit 99.6 to the
Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K
dated December 31,
2004 and filed with
the Commission on
January 11, 2005.
10.06 Description of United Dominion Realty
Trust, Inc. Shareholder Value Plan. Exhibit 10(x) to the
Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1999.
10.07* Description of United Dominion Realty
Trust, Inc. Executive Deferral Plan. Exhibit 10(xi) to
the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1999.
10.8* Retirement Agreement and Covenant Not
to Compete between the Company and John
P. McCann dated March 20, 2001. Exhibit 10(xv) to
the Company’s
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March
31, 2001.

78

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Exhibit Description Location
10.09* Description of Series A Out-Performance
Program. Exhibit 10(xvii) to
the Company’s
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended
September 30, 2001.
10.10* Description of Amendment to Series A
Out-Performance Program. Exhibit 10.03 to the
Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K
dated May 3, 2005
and filed with the
Commission on May 9,
2005.
10.11* 1999 Long-Term Incentive Plan (as
amended and restated through July 22,
2004). Exhibit 99.5 to the
Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K
dated December 31,
2004 and filed with
the Commission on
January 11, 2005.
10.12 Second Amended and Restated Agreement
of Limited Partnership of Heritage
Communities L.P. Exhibit 10.3 to the
Company’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30,
2003.
10.13 First Amendment of Second Amended and
Restated Agreement of Limited
Partnership of Heritage Communities
L.P. Exhibit 10.4 to the
Company’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30,
2003.
10.14 Second Amendment to Second Amended and
Restated Agreement of Limited
Partnership of Heritage Communities
L.P. Exhibit 10.5 to the
Company’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30,
2003.
10.15 Credit Agreement dated as of November
14, 2000, between the Company and
certain subsidiaries and a syndicate of
banks represented by First Union
National Bank. Exhibit 4(ii)(g) to
the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000.
10.16 Credit Agreement dated as of August 14,
2001, between the Company and certain
subsidiaries and ARCS Commercial
Mortgage Company, L.P., as Lender. Exhibit 4(ii)(g) to
the Company’s
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended
September 30, 2001.
10.17 Credit Agreement dated as of December
12, 2001, between the Company and
certain subsidiaries and ARCS
Commercial Mortgage Company, L.P., as
Lender. Exhibit 4(ii)(h) to
the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2001.
10.18 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement
dated May 25, 2005 between the Company
and Wachovia Capital Markets, Exhibit 10.1 to the
Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K
dated May 25, 2005
and filed with the
Commission on May
27, 2005.

79

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Exhibit Description Location
LLC and
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., as Joint
Lead Arrangers and Joint Bookrunners,
Wachovia Bank, National Association, as
Administrative Agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Syndication Agent,
SunTrust Bank and Wells Fargo Bank,
National Association, as Documentation
Agents, Citicorp North America, Inc.,
KeyBank, N.A. and U.S. Bank National
Association, as Managing Agents, and
LaSalle Bank National Association,
Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd., New York
Branch and UFJ Bank Limited, New York
Branch as Co-Agents, and each of the
financial institutions initially
signatory thereto and their assignees.
10.19* Description of Series B Out-Performance
Program. Exhibit 10.22 to the
Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended
December 31, 2003.
10.20* Description of New Out-Performance
Program. Exhibit 10.01 to the
Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K
dated May 3, 2005
and filed with the
Commission on May 9,
2005.
10.21* Description of Series C Out-Performance
Program. Exhibit 10.02 to the
Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K
dated May 3, 2005
and filed with the
Commission on May 9,
2005.
10.22* Participation in the Series C
Out-Performance Program. Exhibit 10.07 to the
Company’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter
ended June 30, 2005.
10.23 Amended and Restated Agreement of
Limited Partnership of United Dominion
Realty, L.P. dated as of February 23,
2004. Exhibit 10.23 to the
Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended
December 31, 2003.
10.24 First Amendment to the Amended and
Restated Agreement of Limited
Partnership of United Dominion Realty,
L.P. Exhibit 10.06 to the
Company’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter
ended June 30, 2005.
10.25* Employment Agreement of Richard A.
Giannotti dated December 8, 1998. Exhibit 10.24 to the
Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended
December 31, 2004.
10.26* Summary of 2006 Director Compensation. Exhibit 10.1 to the
Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K
dated January 3,
2006 and filed with
the Commission on
January 6, 2006.
10.27* Description of the Series D
Out-Performance Program Exhibit 10.2 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 9,
2006 and filed with the Commission on February 15, 2006.
10.28* Executive Compensation Summary. Exhibit 10.1 to the
Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K
dated February 15,
2006 and filed with
the Commission on
February 21, 2006.
10.29* Agreement between the Company and
Thomas W. Toomey dated November 7,
2005, regarding corporate aircraft. Exhibit 10.1 to the
Company’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter
ended September 30,
2005.

80

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Exhibit Description Location
12 Computation of Ratio of Earnings to
Fixed Charges. Filed herewith.
21 Subsidiaries. Filed herewith.
23 Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm Filed herewith.
31.1 Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the
Chief Executive Officer. Filed herewith.
31.2 Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the
Chief Financial Officer. Filed herewith.
32.1 Section 1350 Certification of the Chief
Executive Officer. Filed herewith.
32.2 Section 1350 Certification of the Chief
Financial Officer. Filed herewith.

81