Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

TURNSTONE RESOURCES LTD Capital/Financing Update 2025

Nov 27, 2025

65958_rns_2025-11-27_bdfa6cc6-db98-46c4-91e6-13db68902843.pdf

Capital/Financing Update

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

ASX ANNOUNCEMENT 28 November 2025

==> picture [135 x 45] intentionally omitted <==

Growth Strategy Initiated with Option to Acquire Scandinavian Copper-Gold Project

Highlights

  • Option Agreement executed to acquire Glava Cu-Au-Ag Project, located in Värmland Province, Sweden

  • First potential acquisition under South Harz’s diversified asset growth strategy, expanding its portfolio into critical (base) and precious metals alongside German potash assets

  • High-grade epithermal copper mineralisation, with associated gold, silver and tellurium, confirmed by recent sampling. Historic artisanal mining recorded up to 10.5% Cu

  • Negligible glacial till allows for use of proven, cost-effective exploration techniques

  • Ground magnetic survey and rock chip sampling completed in November 2025, with results to feed into drill target generation

  • Option Agreement includes strategic relationship with vendors McKnight Resources AB, resulting in established and experienced exploration capability in Sweden

  • The potential acquisition delivers immediate discovery opportunity, while preserving the longterm value and optionality in the perpetual tenure across the SHP German potash projects

South Harz Executive Chairman Mr Len Jubber, commented:

“The Glava acquisition option represents an exciting milestone and opportunity for South Harz to leverage our European footprint into one of the most geologically prospective and underexplored copper-gold provinces in Scandinavia. This first step transforms South Harz into a diversified resources company, moving from a single asset company towards a broader regional platform. While we maintain strategic patience with our large-scale South Harz Potash Project, we are broadening our portfolio to include metals essential to global supply chains and the energy transition.

The Glava Project offers immediate discovery potential, hosting visible bornite, covellite, and chalcocite epithermal mineralisation with gold, silver and tellurium in outcropping vein systems, including historic artisanal production of over 10% copper. Negligible glacial till allows for the use of proven, cost-effective exploration techniques. Initial field activities, including a magnetic survey have been completed under the guidance of McKnight Resources and we look forward to analysing and interpreting the gathered information in the coming weeks. We are committed to systematically exploring Glava’s potential, while continuing to evaluate complementary opportunities to strengthen the portfolio and create sustained shareholder value.”

ABN: 64 153 414 852 ASX Code: SHP Frankfurt Code: A3CPT9 Berlin Code: A41DHD Stuttgart Code: A3CPT9

REGISTERED OFFICE U13, 6 -10 Douro Place West Perth, W.A. 6005

CONTACT DETAILS W: southharzpotash.com E: [email protected] P: +61 (0) 408 447 493

==> picture [135 x 45] intentionally omitted <==

South Harz Potash Limited ( ASX:SHP ) ( South Harz or the Company ) is pleased to announce that it has entered into an option heads of agreement to acquire the Glava Copper-Gold-Silver project in south-western Sweden. The acquisition marks the first step in the Company’s transition toward a diversified, multi-asset exploration and development strategy.

The Glava Project

The Glava Project, which is located in Sweden’s Värmland region (Figure 1), covers 430Ha under a single exploration licence within the eastern extensions of the Proterozoic Grenville Orogenic Belt, an emerging copper-gold exploration district extending through Scandinavia, the UK, Greenland and Newfoundland.

The project area comprises a highly prospective and underexplored copper-gold system with a history of high-grade artisanal production. It hosts outcropping bornite, covellite and chalcocite mineralisation, and visible tellurides, as described in the Sweden Geologiocal Survey ( SGU ) database, at two mineral occurrences, namely Glava Koppagruvor and Skarpning SV Glava (Figure 1). The telluride minerals are frequently a component of epithermal deposits. This acquisition gives South Harz immediate exploration access to critical and precious metals in a Tier-1 European jurisdiction.

==> picture [476 x 359] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1: Location of the Glava Cu-Au-Ag Project in Western Sweden

Historic records show that artisanal mining at Glava Koppargruvor produced about 2,280 tonnes of rock, including 49 tonnes with a grade of 10.5% Cu, as well as additional enriched ore stockpiles from shallow early 20th-century workings (Lundegårdh 1995). Two main accessible shallow open pits (East and West), together with an

2

==> picture [135 x 45] intentionally omitted <==

abandoned 14m deep shaft, provided opportunities for a modern assessment of the geological setting and sampling of the material on the adjacent waste dumps (Figure 2). Mineralisation is structurally controlled along a north-south oriented fracture array that intersects the shallow-south-dipping meta-sediment host rocks. The target zone is interpreted to be dipping towards the south (refer Figure 2, Longitudinal Section).

Cautionary Statemen t: The production details from historic mining are derived from publicly available historical sources. The source of the reported production is Lundegårdh 1995; Ba45-1 Beskrivning till berggrundskartan över Värmland: ISBN 91-7158-547-8, pages 150-152 under authority of the SGU. The historical production data cited has not been reported in accordance with the JORC Code 2021. A Competent Person has not carried out sufficient work to classify the historical production data in accordance with JORC Code 2012 and South Harz does not treat the historical data as Mineral Resource or Ore Reserve. It is possible that further evaluation and/or exploration work could reduce the confidence in the historical figures.

==> picture [448 x 412] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2: Historic Glava East and West Pits with Mapped Structural Lineaments and Sampling Locations

3

==> picture [135 x 45] intentionally omitted <==

In 2024, McKnight Resources completed a rock chip sampling program over the East Pit waste dump to enable mineralogical characterisation of the mined material. Data from this sampling program are shown in Table 1. The samples were analysed by ALS Scandinavia in Sweden. A key finding from this sampling program was the presence of gold, silver and tellurium mineralisation associated with copper. As the mining activity was purely focused on copper, these associated precious metals had been ignored in the past.

Sample ID Sector Northing Easting Au
(g/t)

Ag
(g/t)
Cu
(%)

Zn
(ppm)

Te
(ppm)
GLV1 north 6601353 361550 2.27 43 1.38 109 54
GLV2 north 6601353 361550 4.89 49 1.29 158 48
GLV3 north 6601353 361550 2.17 23 0.45 16 33
GLV4 north 6601353 361550 0.99 19 0.36 126 14
GLV5 north 6601353 361550 0.46 7 0.29 80 9
GLV6 south 6601319 361549 0.77 11 0.48 181 14
GLV7 south 6601319 361549 0.88 8 0.90 78 16
GLV8 south 6601319 361549 2.25 19 1.42 219 52
GLV9 south 6601319 361549 3.08 33 1.03 105 36
GLV10 south 6601319 361549 0.08 1 0.32 374 2

Table 1: Analytical Results of Waste Dump Sampling Program, 2024

Notes to Table 1

  • all samples within 20m of pit sector coordinate

  • all samples consist of rock waste from adjacent pit excavation

  • Au measured with method Au-AA23 30g aliquot

  • Cu measured with ME-MS61 and Cu-OG62 for >10,000ppm

  • Ag, Zn,Te measured with method ME-MS61

  • Grades do not represent bulk sampling grades

Exploration Activity

Field activities commenced in November 2025 under an exclusivity agreement and are progressing to rapidly advance Glava towards drill readiness. Phase 1 of the program, to be completed during Q4 CY25 and Q1 CY26, includes the recently completed geological mapping, rock-chip sampling and ground magnetic survey (40 line-kilometres at 25metre spacing). The magnetic survey aims to provide further information to assist with drill targeting of the potential mineralised zone

The geological mapping and rock-chip sampling included geochemical surveys designed to define copper-gold anomalies across the project area. All structural, magnetic and geochemical datasets will be integrated into a central Geological Information System ( GIS ) platform to refine targeting ahead of drilling.

The magnetic survey results are expected to be available in December 2025 whilst the assaying of rock chip samples will be completed during December with results expected by end January 2026.

Once the results from the various Phase 1 work programmes are incorporated in the GIS and fully analysed, Phase 2 will be scheduled to commence in the June 2026 quarter, comprising targeted rotary core drilling across priority prospects, followed by initial diamond drilling and early metallurgical test-work.

The initial exploration phase is detailed in Table 2.

4

==> picture [135 x 45] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [524 x 227] intentionally omitted <==

Table 2: Proposed Glava Work Programme

Transaction Terms

South Harz has entered into an option heads of agreement with McKnight Resources AB ( McKnight ) to secure an exclusive option over the Glava 100 permit in Sweden, as well as to facilitate new permit applications in the region.

Exclusive Option & Work Programme

  • SHP has secured an exclusive option to acquire 100% of the Glava 100 permit from McKnight, subject to completion of technical, financial, and legal due diligence to SHP’s satisfaction.

  • SHP will fund defined exploration activities including ground magnetics, surface sampling, GIS database establishment, and technical reporting ( Work Programme ) to a maximum of A$304,000 (including a mobilisation fee already paid) over the period from 10 November 2025 to 31 March 2026. The mobilisation fee already paid has enabled McKnight to commence the Work Programme, undertaking field activities before winter snow arrives in the region.

Option Exercise & Consideration

  • SHP may exercise its option at any time during the exercise period (ending 30 days after completion of the Work Programme or 31 March 2026, whichever is later).

  • Upon exercise, SHP will acquire the Glava 100 permit for A$150,000, payable in South Harz ordinary shares at an issue price equal to the 20-day VWAP at the time of exercise of the option by South Harz (and subject to shareholder approvals).

  • Completion of the option exercise involves transfer of clean title to the Glava 100 permit, delivery of relevant documents, and a technical report on the outcome of the Work Programme.

5

==> picture [135 x 45] intentionally omitted <==

New Permit Applications

  • The parties are also considering applying for further new permits, which McKnight will prepare and lodge in its name, on trust for South Harz. South Harz will pay the cost of the applications to the Geological Survey of Sweden ( SGU ), and the parties will transfer legal ownership to South Harz (subject to foreign investment approval by the Swedish regulator, if required) at the appropriate time, at South Harz’s option.

Technical Committee & Ongoing Services

  • A technical committee, comprising representatives from both South Harz and McKnight, will oversee the Work Programme and advise on exploration, stakeholder management, and compliance.

  • The parties intend to negotiate a technical services agreement for ongoing support by McKnight.

Royalty

  • A 1.5% net smelter royalty deed in favour of McKnight will be executed in relation to the Glava 100 permit, consistent with industry standards.

Approvals

  • All transactions are subject to required shareholder and regulatory approvals, with the agreements to be governed by Western Australian law.

Sweden

Sweden is widely recognised as one of the world’s most attractive jurisdictions for mineral exploration and development, with a long history of mining, transparent legislation and strong government support. The country’s 2014 National Mineral Strategy provides a clear framework that encourages responsible investment and outlines commitments to maintain a positive operating environment for the mining industry. Sweden has combined an established infrastructure network, skilled workforce, and a commitment to developing critical minerals for the European energy transition and is a Tier-1 jurisdiction for discovery and development of projects such as Glava. This approach has been recognised in the mining industry and the country ranked 6[th ] (out of 183) in the Fraser Institute Annual Survey of Mining Companies, 2024.

Growth Platform

South Harz Board has adopted a multi-asset/commodity strategy through targeted and aligned new asset acquisitions and advancement, leveraging on its existing corporate foundation and established presence in Europe and Australia, with a disciplined focus from a proven team with suitable capability.

The advanced Ohmgebirge MOP project, with its complementary production of salt (NaCl), coupled with the other South Harz deposits in Germany, are well positioned to capture value on multiple levels.

Our growth strategy complements the long-term value and optionality of the potash assets with exposure to critical and precious / base metal projects. The common investment theme being their leverage to the critical need for resilient supply chains and energy transition in Europe.

The Company believes that potash pricing remains a key factor in the relatively low valuation that the ASX market is attributing to its South Harz Potash Project. Hence our strategic patience approach including targeting minimal

6

==> picture [135 x 45] intentionally omitted <==

holding costs for the South Harz Potash Project, which enjoys the benefits of perpetual tenure. South Harz continues to seek a development partner for this globally significant advanced potash project.

This ASX release has been approved by the Board of Directors.

Competent Persons Statement

The information in this ASX release that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled and reviewed by Mr. Alfred Gillman, Director of independent consulting firm, Odessa Resources Pty Ltd. Mr. Gillman, a Fellow and Chartered Professional of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (the AusIMM) and has sufficient experience relevant to the styles of mineralisation under consideration and to the activity being reported to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Exploration Targets and Mineral Resources. Mr Gillman is a full-time employee of Odessa Resources Pty Ltd, a firm that specialises in mineral resource estimation, evaluation, and exploration. Neither Mr Gillman nor Odessa Resources Pty Ltd holds any interest in South Harz Potash, its related parties, or in any of the mineral properties that are the subject of this announcement. Mr Gillman consents to the inclusion in this ASX release of the matters based on information in the form and context in which it appears. Additionally, Mr Gillman confirms that the entity is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information contained in the ASX releases referred to in this report.

JORC

To the extent that this announcement contains references to prior exploration results which have been cross referenced to previous market announcements made by the Company, unless explicitly stated, no new information is contained. The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the relevant market announcements and, in the case of estimates of Mineral Resources, that all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the estimates in the relevant market announcements continue to apply and have not materially changed.

References

Lundegårdh 1995; Ba45-1 Beskrivning till berggrundskartan över Värmland: ISBN 91-7158-547-8

Investor and media

Len Jubber Investor and Media Relations Executive Chairman Andrew Willis South Harz Potash Ltd NWR Communications [email protected] [email protected]

7

==> picture [135 x 45] intentionally omitted <==

JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1

Section 1: Sampling Techniques and Data

(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Sampling
techniques
Nature and quality of sampling
(eg cut channels, random chips,
or specific specialised industry
standard measurement tools
appropriate to the minerals under
investigation, such as down hole
gamma sondes, or handheld
XRF instruments, etc). These
examples should not be taken as
limiting the broad meaning of
_sampling. _
In 2024, McKnight Resources collected 10 waste rock
samples.
Samples were collected by hand on the waste dumps that
are located adjacent to the historic East Pit excavation.
Samples were weighed and photographed.
The sample locations were within a 20m radius of the
sample reference point and was obtained with a hand-
held GPS.
Include reference to measures
taken to ensure sample
retrospectivity and the
appropriate calibration of any
measurement tools or systems
used.
Samples were collected by hand from the waste dumps
surrounding historic workings.
Aspects of the determination of
mineralisation that are Material to
the Public Report. In cases
where ‘industry standard’ work
has been done this would be
relatively simple (eg ‘reverse
circulation drilling was used to
obtain 1 m samples from which 3
kg was pulverised to produce a
30 g charge for fire assay’). In
other cases more explanation
may be required, such as where
there is coarse gold that has
inherent sampling problems.
Unusual commodities or
mineralisation types (eg
submarine nodules) may warrant
disclosure of detailed
information.

8

==> picture [135 x 45] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Drilling
techniques
Drill type (eg core, reverse
circulation, open-hole hammer,
rotary air blast, auger, Bangka,
sonic, etc) and details (eg core
diameter, triple or standard tube,
depth of diamond tails, face-
sampling bit or other type,
whether core is oriented and if so,
by what method, etc).
No drilling data is reported
Drill sample
recovery
Method of recording and
assessing core and chip sample
recoveries and results assessed.
No drilling data is reported
Measures taken to maximise
sample recovery and ensure
representative nature of the
samples.
No drilling data is reported
Whether a relationship exists
between sample recovery and
grade and whether sample bias
may have occurred due to
preferential loss/gain of
fine/coarse material.
No drilling data is reported
Logging Whether core and chip samples
have been geologically and
geotechnically logged to a level
of detail to support appropriate
Mineral Resource estimation,
mining studiesandmetallurgical
studies.
No drilling data is reported
Whether logging is qualitative or
quantitative in nature. Core (or
costean, channel, etc)
photography.

9

==> picture [135 x 45] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
The total length and percentage
of the relevant intersections
logged.
No drilling data is reported
Sub-
sampling
techniques
and sample
preparation
If core, whether cut or sawn and
whether quarter, half or all core
taken.
No drilling data is reported
If non-core, whether riffled, tube
sampled, rotary split, etc and
_whether sampled wet or dry. _
No drilling data is reported
For all sample types, the nature,
quality and appropriateness of
the sample preparation
technique.
No drilling data is reported.
Samples were collected by hand from the waste dumps
surrounding historic workings.
Quality control procedures
adopted for all sub-sampling
stages to maximise representivity
of samples.
Samples were collected by hand from the waste dumps
surrounding historic workings.
As the samples are not in-situ they are considered to be
indicative but not representative of potential deposit scale
mineralisation.
Measures taken to ensure that
the sampling is representative of
the in situ material collected,
including for instance results for
field duplicate/second-half
_sampling. _
The samples are considered to be indicative but not
representative of potential deposit scale mineralisation.
Whether sample sizes are
appropriate to the grain size of
the material being sampled.
Samples are collected as rock chip (~1cm) to macro-
scale hand specimens (~5-10cm)
Quality of
assay data
and
laboratory
tests
The nature, quality and
appropriateness of the assaying
and laboratory procedures used
and whether the technique is
consideredpartial or total.
Assays for the sampling were undertaken by ALS using
methods AA23, ME-MS61 and Cu OG62.
The CP has sited the relevant original laboratory reports.
For geophysical tools,
spectrometers, handheld XRF
instruments, etc, the parameters
used in determining the analysis
including instrument make and
model, reading times,
calibrations factors applied and
their derivation, etc.
No geophysical tools have been utilised.

10

==> picture [135 x 45] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Nature of quality control
procedures adopted (eg
standards, blanks, duplicates,
external laboratory checks) and
whether acceptable levels of
accuracy (ie lack of bias) and
precision have been established.
No standards, blanks or duplicates were included in the
assay procedure.
Verification
of sampling
and
assaying
The verification of significant
intersections by either
independent or alternative
company personnel.
No drilling data is reported
The use of twinned holes. No drillingdata is reported
Documentation of primary data,
data entry procedures, data
verification, data storage
(physical and electronic)
protocols.
No drilling data is reported
Discuss any adjustment to assay
data.
No adjustments have been made.
Location of
data points
Accuracy and quality of surveys
used to locate drill holes (collar
and down-hole surveys),
trenches, mine workings and
other locations used in Mineral
Resource estimation.
No drilling data is reported
Specification of the grid system
used.
WGS84 UTM Zone 33N
Quality and adequacy of
topographic control.
SRTM data has been used and adequate at this stage of
theproject
Data spacing for reporting of
Exploration Results.
Sampling was carried out at random points on the waste
dumps.

11

==> picture [135 x 45] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Data
spacing and
distribution
Whether the data spacing and
distribution is sufficient to
establish the degree of
geological and grade continuity
appropriate for the Mineral
Resource and Ore Reserve
estimation procedure(s) and
classifications applied.
There has not been any attempt or intent to assume
grade continuity for use in a mineral resource estimate
Whether sample compositing has
been applied.
Samples were not composited prior to laboratory test
work.
Orientation
of data in
relation to
geological
structure
Whether the orientation of
sampling achieves unbiased
sampling of possible structures
and the extent to which this is
known, considering the deposit
type.
Sampling was carried out at random points on the waste
dumps.
If the relationship between the
drilling orientation and the
orientation of key mineralised
structures is considered to have
introduced a sampling bias, this
should be assessed and reported
if material.
No drilling data is reported
Sample
security
The measures taken to ensure
sample security.
Rock chip samples were dispatched directly from the
McKnight Resources sample storage to the laboratory.
Audits or
reviews
The results of any audits or
reviews of sampling techniques
and data.
No audits have been conducted.

12

==> picture [135 x 45] intentionally omitted <==

Section 2: Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Mineral
tenement and
land tenure
status
Type, reference name/number,
location and ownership including
agreements or material issues
with third parties such as joint
ventures, partnerships,
overriding royalties, native title
interests, historical sites,
wilderness or national park and
environmental settings.
The Glava nr 100 permit is located within the Arvika
Principality of the Värmland region of southern Sweden.
The registered holder of the Glava nr 100 permit is
McKnight Resources AB.
SHP has secured an exclusive option to acquire 100% of
the Glava 100 permit from McKnight Resources AB,
subject to completion of technical, financial, and legal due
diligence to SHP’s satisfaction.
The security of the tenure held at
the time of reporting along with
any known impediments to
obtaining a licence to operate in
the area.
There are no known impediments to the security of the
tenure.
Exploration
done by other
parties
Acknowledgment and appraisal
of exploration by other parties.
Mining took place for a few years but ceased before the end
of World War II.
East Pit
The largest and normally partially water-filled trench in the
older eastern field, measures 45 m north-south and has a
greatest width of 8 m. In 1990 at the south-east corner of
the main excavation, water pumping was carried out
exposing a small shaft. The quarry is at most 4 - 5 m deep,
with the shaft to approximately 14 m.
West Pit
Mining has been concentrated to a 60m long and maximum
7m wide shallow excavation trending north-south. The
excavation is filled with water. Close to the south is a water-
filled single shaft with the surface dimensions of 3 x 3 m,
from which local driving must have taken place. Maximum
depth of the mine stated not to exceed 10m.
The ore mineralization is fracture bound and was first
discovered in 1880.
Historically the Glava copper fields were first investigated
by an English company in the 1870’s, but no work of
importance was carried out. In 1907-8 the mine field was

13

==> picture [135 x 45] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
confiscated by the mining company Nordlanden and finally
in 1911 by mining bailiff Gustaf Wik in Glava, who during
the first World War sold the mining rights to John Rettig in
Stockholm.
In the years 1916-18, 2280 tons of rock were mined in the
east of the field part. The yield was reportedly 49 tons of
ore with 10.5% copper and 500 tons of enrichment ore. The
gold content of the copper field ore was not yet known, and
consequently no precious metal extraction took place.
From the 1980’s to present sporadic exploration comprising
rock chip sampling has been completed by the Swedish
Geological Survey (SGU)and McKnight Resources AB.
Geology Deposit type, geological setting
and style of mineralisation.
The bedrock consists of gneissic and partly schistose,
strongly metamorphosed volcanics. There is probably also
granodiorite. The most common metamorphic minerals are
albite, hornblende, chlorite and epidote. In addition, there
is also garnet, limespar, hematite and prehnite. Small
amounts of early formed magnetite are also included. To
the south this unit underlies a thin strip of marble-like
limestone.
The copper mineralisation is present in near vertical
fractures with general north-south strike. The cracks are
interrupted in some cases. The width usually varies
between a few millimetres and a few decimetres. However,
the mining in the eastern part of the deposit must have
taken place on one significantly wider crack filling.
Aggregates of copper ore from here are said to have
weighed several kilograms.
The larger fractures and cracks consist mainly of quartz,
while cracks narrower than 3 to 4 mm are dominated by ore
minerals. Most common among these is bornite, while
chalcocite occurs more sparingly. Chalcopyrite forms
segregations in the bornite in a few places. Digenite often
occurs together with the bornite in the form of younger
interweaving. Covellite is found in the form of grains in the
chalcocite and the bornite. The digenite has been partially
converted to chalcocite. This mineral, in turn, is older than
covellite.
Drillhole
Information
A summary of all information
material to the understanding of
the exploration results including
a tabulation of the following
information for all Material drill
holes:
No drilling data is reported

14

==> picture [135 x 45] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Data
aggregation
methods
In reporting Exploration Results,
weighting averaging techniques,
maximum and/or minimum grade
truncations (eg cutting of high
grades) and cut-off grades are
usually Material and should be
stated.
No drilling data is reported
Where aggregate intercepts
incorporate short lengths of high
grade results and longer lengths
of low grade results, the
procedure used for such
aggregation should be stated
and some typical examples of
such aggregations should be
shown in detail.
No drilling data is reported
The assumptions used for any
reporting of metal equivalent
values should be clearly stated.
No metal equivalents were used or reported.
Relationship
between
mineralisation
widths and
intercept
lengths
These relationships are
particularly important in the
reporting of Exploration Results.
No drilling data is reported
If the geometry of the
mineralisation with respect to the
drill-hole angle is known, its
nature should be reported.
If it is not known and only the
down hole lengths are reported,
there should be a clear
statement to this effect (eg
‘down hole length, true width not
_known’). _
Diagrams Appropriate maps and sections
(with scales) and tabulations of
intercepts should be included for
any significant discovery being
reported These should include,
but not be limited to aplan view
See body of announcement

15

==> picture [135 x 45] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
of drill-hole collar locations and
appropriate sectional views.
Balanced
reporting
Where comprehensive reporting
of all Exploration Results is not
practicable, representative
reporting of both low and high
grades and/or widths should be
practiced to avoid misleading
reporting of Exploration Results.
All available sampling information was used.
Other
substantive
exploration
data
Other exploration data, if
meaningful and material, should
be reported including (but not
limited to): geological
observations; geophysical
survey results; geochemical
survey results; bulk samples –
size and method of treatment;
metallurgical test results; bulk
density, groundwater,
geotechnical and rock
characteristics; potential
deleterious or contaminating
substances.
There is no additional information
Further work The nature and scale of planned
further work (eg tests for lateral
extensions or depth extensions
or large-scale step-out drilling).
Planned exploration activities include:

Rock alteration geochemical survey

Geological mapping

Ground magnetic survey
Diagrams clearly highlighting the
areas of possible extensions,
including the main geological
interpretations and future drilling
areas, provided this information
is not commercially sensitive.
See body of announcement

16