Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

TUNGSTEN MINING NL Capital/Financing Update 2020

Mar 11, 2020

65918_rns_2020-03-11_96a08fbd-edf6-4eaf-afe9-6202588298f2.pdf

Capital/Financing Update

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

==> picture [594 x 146] intentionally omitted <==

12 March 2020

ASX ANNOUNCEMENT

Drilling program successfully completed at the Mulgine Trench Deposit; results continue to intersect significant polymetallic mineralisation

Highlights

  • Resource Development drilling program successfully completed with a total of 280 holes for 48,654 metres drilled

  • The latest assay results continue to illustrate substantial thicknesses of tungsten mineralisation within a 160 to 260 metre wide zone at Mulgine Trench. Drilling has defined mineralised envelopes of:

  • 216 metres at 0.10% WO3 and 290 ppm Mo from 36 metres in MMC448

  • 206 metres at 0.10% WO3 and 320 ppm Mo from 82 metres in MMC449

  • 204 metres at 0.09% WO3 and 270 ppm Mo from 10 metres in MMC496

  • Drilling continued to intersect stronger molybdenum mineralisation associated within the 50m to 120m wide Lower Tungsten-Molybdenum Domain within the larger tungsten envelope. Better intersections include: o 38 metres at 0.11% WO3 and 840 ppm Mo from 104 metres in MMC527

  • 40 metres at 0.09% WO3, 560 ppm Mo from 82 metres and 44 metres at 0.08% WO3, 550 ppm Mo from 126 metres in MMC528

  • An updated Mineral Resource estimate is planned to be completed in April 2020.

Commentary

Australian tungsten developer, Tungsten Mining NL (ASX: TGN) (“TGN” or “the Company”) is pleased to report on the latest results from drilling at the Mt Mulgine Project.

On 19 December 2019, the Company announced the updated Mulgine Trench Mineral Resource estimate resulting in a major increase in contained tungsten and molybdenum and highlighting the significance of accessory minerals gold (850,000 ounces) and silver (35 million ounces) (refer ASX announcement 19 December 2019, “Major Mineral Resource Estimate Upgrade for Mulgine Trench Deposit”).

This announcement reports the latest assay results received by the Company from 21st February to 6th March 2020, representing 28 RC holes for 4,755 metres .

The Company is pleased to report that the latest assay results - subsequent to the Mineral Resource estimate released in December 2019, continue to be outstanding and demonstate intersections greater that 200 metres in true width.

Tungsten Mining’s CEO Craig Ferrier commented, “We have now completed the planned infill drill program at the Mulgine Trench deposit. The results have demonstrated that the polymetallic mineralisation is remarkably consistent throughout the Trench deposit with substantial thickness extending to a 260 metre wide zone. The results of the drilling program have been outstanding and we look forward to reporting on an updated Mineral Resource estimate in April and other work streams as we complete the PFS for Mt Mulgine.”

==> picture [594 x 74] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [775 x 537] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Mulgine Trench Deposit: Section A - B (Tungsten)
A B
400RL
300RL
Orange drill intercept =
Tungsten results from current RC drilling program
192/0.13 = 192 metres @ 0.13% WO3
Red drill intercept =
Molybdenum results from current RC drilling program
Intercepts >0.02% (200ppm) Mo shown
200RL
0 100 200m
2019 Block Model 2019 Block Model
< 0.05% WO�
TGN RC hole - current drill program
Inferred 207Mt @ 0.05 - 0.10% WO�
Drilling from previous program 0.11% WO�, 0.10 - 0.15% WO�
Base of oxida�on Le�: Right: 0.15 - 0.20% WO�
(interpreted) Tungsten intersec�on > 0.05% WO3 Molybdenum intersec�on > 0.02% Mo (200 ppm) (at 0.05% WO� cutoff) 272 ppm Mo >0.20% WO�
----- End of picture text -----

Figure 1. Cross section showing outlines and intersections >0.05% WO� defined by Tungsten Mining drilling against the 2019 Mulgine Trench Mineral Resource. Location of section is displayed on Figure 4.

Page 2

Mulgine Trench Deposit: Section A - B (Molybdenum)

==> picture [717 x 464] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

A B
400RL
300RL
Orange drill intercept =
Tungsten results from current RC drilling program
Intercepts >0.05% WO3 shown
Red drill intercept =
Molybdenum results from current RC drilling program
110/410 = 110 metres @410ppm Mo
0 100 200m
2019 Block Model 2019 Block Model - Mo
TGN RC hole - current drill program Inferred 207Mt @ 0.11% < 200 ppm Mo
Wo�, 200 - 500 ppm Mo
272 ppm Mo
500 - 800 ppm Mo
Base of oxida�on (interpreted) Tungsten intersec�on Le�: Molybdenum intersec�on Right: >0.05% WO� 800 - 1000 ppm Mo
> 0.05% WO 3 > 0.02% Mo (200 ppm) interpreted outline
>= 1000 ppm Mo
----- End of picture text -----

Figure 2. Cross section displaying Lower Tungsten-Molybdenum domain defined by molybdenum block model and intersections greater than 200ppm Mo. Location of section is displayed on Figure 4.

Page 3

Discussion of latest assay results

In July 2019, the Company commenced a phased drilling program as part of the Mt Mulgine Project PFS with the objective of upgrading the dominantly Inferred Mulgine Trench Mineral Resource estimate to a dominantly Indicated status. The reverse circulation (RC) component of drilling program infilling sections to a 40 metre spacing was completed on 21 February 2020. Eight of these RC holes were deepened by diamond tails to reach target depths and this was completed on the 27 February 2020. A total of 280 holes for 48,654 metres (47,991 metre of RC drilling, 663 metres HQ diamond tails) has been drilled.

Latest assay results from the 28 holes being reported were dominantly from the south-western end of the deposit. Tungsten mineralisation is narrowing in this vicinity, however drilling still intersect multiple tungsten-molybdenum intersections within a 100 to 160 metre envelope. Holes drilled further north intersected up to a 200 metres thick envelope. Better holes that demonstrate the significance of mineralisation include MMC448, MMC449 and MMC496. These holes intersected multiple zones with minor internal waste forming overall mineralised envelopes of 216 metres at 0.10% WO3 and 290 ppm Mo from 36 metres, 206 metres at 0.10% WO3 and 320 ppm Mo from 82 metres and 204 metres at 0.09% WO3 and 270 ppm Mo from 10 metres respectively. All three holes were drilled perpendicular to mineralisation and intervals represent true thicknesses (Figure 1).

Of the 4,755 metres from the 28 holes being reported, 2,672 metres fell within an intersection greater than 3 metres at 0.05% WO3 that, in aggregate terms, averaged 0.11% WO3, 280 ppm Mo, 0.16 ppm Au and 5 ppm Ag. This is consistent with the grade predicted by the 2019 Mineral Resource for blocks greater than 0.05% WO3.

Lower Tungsten-Molybdenum domain : in addition, the drilling continues to intersect significant polymetallic mineralisation associated with a lower Tungsten-Molybdenum domain that forms a 50 to 120 metre thick zone (Table 3 and Figure 2). Better holes from this zone include 38 metres at 0.11% WO3 and 840 ppm Mo from 104 metres in MMC527, 40 metres at 0.09% WO3, 560 ppm Mo from 82 metres and 44 metres at 0.08% WO3, 550 ppm Mo from 126 metres in MMC528. Again, holes were drilled perpendicular to mineralisation and intervals represent true thicknesses.

A list of better holes from the latest assay results received with substantial zones of tungsten mineralisation from the 0.05% WO3 envelope displaying the bulk tonnage nature of Mulgine Trench is presented in Table 2. Better holes from the lower Tungsten-Molybdenum domain at a 200 ppm Mo lower cut-off are presented in Table 3. Better gold intersections greater than 0.10 ppm Au are reported in Table 4. A complete list of intersections greater than 3 metres at 0.05% WO3, 3 metres at 200 ppm Mo and 10 metres at 0.10 ppm Au are listed in Appendix 1, 2 and 3 respectively.

Mulgine Trench Mineral Resource

Resource consultants, Optiro Pty Ltd (Optiro) were engaged to update the Mulgine Trench Mineral Resource with results from the resource definition drilling commenced in July 2019. The update incorporated the drilling results from first 123 reverse circulation (RC) holes received to 22 November 2019.

The revised Mineral Resource estimate for Mulgine Trench as of 19 December 2019 above a 0.05% WO3 reporting cut-off grade is as follows:

Table 1: JORC-2012 Mineral Resource estimates for Mulgine Trench at 0.05% WO3 reporting cut-off grade

Mulgine Trench Inferred Mineral Resource – December 2019 Mulgine Trench Inferred Mineral Resource – December 2019 Mulgine Trench Inferred Mineral Resource – December 2019 Mulgine Trench Inferred Mineral Resource – December 2019 Mulgine Trench Inferred Mineral Resource – December 2019 Mulgine Trench Inferred Mineral Resource – December 2019 Mulgine Trench Inferred Mineral Resource – December 2019 Mulgine Trench Inferred Mineral Resource – December 2019 Mulgine Trench Inferred Mineral Resource – December 2019 Mulgine Trench Inferred Mineral Resource – December 2019
Oxidation Mt WO3 % WO3 (t) Mo ppm Mo (t) Au ppm Au (Oz) Ag ppm Ag (MOz)
Oxide 35 0.11 37,000 280 9,700 0.15 160,000 3 3
Fresh 172 0.11 190,000 271 47,000 0.12 690,000 6 32
Total 207 0.11 230,000 272 56,000 0.13 850,000 5 35

Refer ASX Announcement 19 December 2019, “Major Mineral Resource Estimate Update for Mulgine Trench Deposit”. Note: Totals may differ from sum of individual numbers as numbers have been rounded in accordance with the Australian JORC code 2012 guidance on Mineral Resource reporting.

Page 4

At a 0.05% WO3 cut-off grade and compared against the previous Mineral Resource estimate, drilling completed by the Company to 22 November 2019 resulted in a 189% increase in tonnes and an increase in contained metal of 97% in tungsten and 211% for molybdenum. In addition, gold and silver (accessory minerals) grades were estimated into the block model and this defined 850,000 ounces of gold and 35 million ounces of silver .

The extent of the deportment and recovery of these accessory minerals is presently uncertain. Metallurgical test work to confirm recoveries for all minerals is in progress as part of the PFS programme and will be reported as the relevant information becomes available.

==> picture [511 x 356] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 3. Location of Mulgine Hill and Mulgine Trench Mineral Resources.

The Mt Mulgine Project is located in the Murchison Region of Western Australia, approximately 350km north northeast of Perth. The Company owns 100% of the tungsten and molybdenum rights on a group of tenements that have been the subject of significant previous evaluation for tungsten and molybdenum. The Company also has the rights to all by-products from the mining of tungsten and molybdenum. Near surface Mineral Resources have been delineated at the Mulgine Trench and Mulgine Hill deposits, which have been the subject of ongoing evaluation by the Company (Figure 3).

Tungsten-molybdenum mineralisation at Mt Mulgine is associated with the Mulgine Granite - a high-level leucogranite forming a 2km stock that intrudes the Mulgine anticline (Figure 3). The granite intrudes a greenstone sequence composed of micaceous schists, amphibolite and talc-chlorite schist which were formerly metasediments, mafic and ultramafic rocks respectively. Tungsten-molybdenum mineralisation at Mulgine Trench is associated with altered and quartz veined mafic and ultramafic units that form a 160 metre to 260 metre thick zone over 1.4 kilometres of strike and dips shallowly towards the northwest.

The RC phase of resource definition RC drilling was completed on 21 February and a small number of diamond tails was completed on 27 February. An updated Mineral Resource estimate using all new drilling data is planned to be prepared in April 2020. This updated block model will be used for pit optimisation and engineering studies as part of the PFS.

Page 5

==> picture [761 x 543] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

6,773,000 496,500 6,772,500
Mulgine Trench Prospect
Mulgine Trench Project
Better Tungsten Intersection (>0 .0 5% WO 3)
South Sheet
MMC448
216m at 0.10 ppm WO 3, 290 ppm Mo
MMC533
MMC449 104m at 0.13 ppm WO 3, 390 ppm Mo
206m at 0.10 ppm WO 3, 320 ppm Mo
MMC526
134m at 0.12 ppm WO 3, 240 ppm Mo
MMC500
MMC496 100m at 0.10 ppm WO 3, 270 ppm Mo
204m at 0.09 ppm WO 3, 270 ppm Mo
MMC499
MMC528 94m at 0.09 ppm WO 3, 240 ppm Mo
194m at 0.10 ppm WO 3, 300 ppm Mo
A B
MMC529
170m at 0.09 ppm WO 3, 240 ppm Mo
MMC527
182m at 0.10 ppm WO 3, 320 ppm Mo
MMC531
148m at 0.07 ppm WO 3, 190 ppm Mo
MMC530
188m at 0.09 ppm WO 3, 190 ppm Mo
MMC505
MMC509 98m at 0.09 ppm WO 3, 400 ppm Mo
132m at 0.09 ppm WO 3, 180 ppm Mo
MMC508
158m at 0.08 ppm WO 3, 220 ppm Mo TGN PFS DRILLING RESOURCE AREA
! Results Reporting Outline
MMC507 !( Previously Reported GOLD PITS
144m at 0.07 ppm WO 3, 280 ppm Mo 2019 Mineral Resource !( Assays Pending Outline
Outline
HISTORIC HOLES TENEMENTS
GF Tungsten Holes Mining Lease
0 100 200 300 GF Gold Drilling
m
495,500 6,772,500 496,000 6,772,000
511
G
G G G
GF
GF GF GF GF GF GFGFGFGF GF GF GF GF !( GF GF GF!(GF GF!(GF !( (! GF GF
GF
GF GF GF
!( !( !( !( !( !( (! (!
GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF
!(
!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(
GF GF !( GF !( GF(! GF GF GF (! !( GF (! GF GF GF GF GF GF
!( !( GF GF
!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( GF
!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(
!( GF
GF
GF GF !( GF !( GF !( GF GFGF !( !( !( !( !( !(
!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(
GF
GF !( !( GF GF !( !( GF !(
!( GF
!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( GF GF
GF
GF GF GF GF GFGFGFGF GF GF
!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( GF GF GF GF
GF GF
GF GF GF GFGFGFGFGF GFGF GF
!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( GF GF GFGFGF GFGF GFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGF GF
GF GFGF
GF !( GF !(!( GF !( GF !( GF !( !( !( GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF
GF
!( GF GF GF GF GFGF
!( !( !( !( !( !( !(
!( GF GF GF GF
GF
!( !( !( !( !( !( !( GF GF GF GF GF
!( GF GF !( !(GF !( !( GF GF GF GF GF GF GF
!(
GF GF GF
GF GF
!( !( !( !( !( GF GF GF
GF GF GFGFGF GFGF GFGF GF
GF GF GF GF
GF GF GF GF GF GF
GF GF
GF GF GFGFGF GF GF GF GFGF GF GF GF GF
GF GF GF
GFGF
GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF
GF
!( !( !( !(
GF GF GF GF
! ! !
§ !!!!!!!!!!!!! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!((!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(!(!(!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!(!(!!!!!!!!!!!(!!!!!!!((!!! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(!!!!!!!!!!!!(!!!((!!!(!!!!!!!(!!!!!!!!((!!!!!(!!((!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(!(! !(!!(!!!!!!!!!!!!(!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !
535 ! ! ! ! !!! !
534
533
449 448
532
496
529 528 527526 500 499 498 450
531 530
509 508 507 506505504 503
510
513 512
496,000
6,773,000
496,500
6,772,000
495,500
----- End of picture text -----

Figure 4. Plan showing location of holes and better intersections at Mulgine Trench - Southern end of the deposit. Assay results currently being reported are red circles and assays pending are black circles.

Page 6

Table 2 – Holes with substantial thicknesses of tungsten mineralisation at Trench

Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Tungsten Mineralisation (within 0.05% WO3 envelope) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Tungsten Mineralisation (within 0.05% WO3 envelope) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Tungsten Mineralisation (within 0.05% WO3 envelope) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Tungsten Mineralisation (within 0.05% WO3 envelope) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Tungsten Mineralisation (within 0.05% WO3 envelope) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Tungsten Mineralisation (within 0.05% WO3 envelope) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Tungsten Mineralisation (within 0.05% WO3 envelope) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Tungsten Mineralisation (within 0.05% WO3 envelope) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Tungsten Mineralisation (within 0.05% WO3 envelope)
Hole No MGA Coordinates Intersections
Northing
(m)
Easting
(m)
Depth
(m)
Dip/
Azim
From
(m)
To
(m)
Interval
(m)
WO3
(%)
Mo
(ppm)
MMC448 6,772,760 496,081 270 -60/135 36 252 216 0.10 290
MMC449 6,772,788 496,052 288 -60/135 82 288 206 0.10 320
MMC496 6,772,646 496,026 226 -60/135 10 214 204 0.09 270
MMC507 6,772,448 495,997 198 -60/135 4 168 164 0.08 260
MMC508 6,772,476 495,966 210 -60/135 4 162 158 0.08 220
MMC509 6,772,506 495,936 234 -60/135 46 178 132 0.09 180
MMC526 6,772,534 496,083 180 -60/135 0 134 134 0.12 240
MMC527 6,772,547 496,069 186 -70/135 0 182 182 0.10 320
MMC528 6,772,588 496,026 204 -60/135 10 198 188 0.09 300
MMC529 6,772,617 495,996 222 -60/135 42 212 170 0.09 240
MMC530 6,772,504 495,997 210 -60/135 0 196 196 0.08 180
MMC531 6,772,531 495,967 216 -60/135 30 178 148 0.07 190
MMC533 6,772,603 496,292 132 -60/135 0 104 104 0.13 390
2m cone split RC samples were submitted to Bureau Veritas Minerals Pty Ltd, Canning Vale WA for WO3 by XRF and Mo by Laser Ablation
ICP-MS. Tungsten mineralisation from 0.05% WO3 envelope with minor zones of interval waste, no top cut grade. True thickness is 90 -
100% of intersection length for inclined holes. Grid coordinates are MGA Zone 50. For a complete list of intersection >3m at 0.05% WO3 refer
to Appendix 1.

Table 3 – Better molybdenum intersections in drilling at Mulgine Trench

Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Tungsten-Molybdenum Mineralisation (at 200 ppm Mo cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Tungsten-Molybdenum Mineralisation (at 200 ppm Mo cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Tungsten-Molybdenum Mineralisation (at 200 ppm Mo cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Tungsten-Molybdenum Mineralisation (at 200 ppm Mo cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Tungsten-Molybdenum Mineralisation (at 200 ppm Mo cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Tungsten-Molybdenum Mineralisation (at 200 ppm Mo cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Tungsten-Molybdenum Mineralisation (at 200 ppm Mo cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Tungsten-Molybdenum Mineralisation (at 200 ppm Mo cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Tungsten-Molybdenum Mineralisation (at 200 ppm Mo cut off)
Hole No MGA Coordinates Intersections
Northing
(m)
Easting
(m)
Depth
(m)
Dip/
Azim
From
(m)
To
(m)
Interval
(m)
WO3
(%)
Mo
(ppm)
MMC448 6,772,760 496,081 270 -60/135 148 164 16 0.09 680
MMC448 178 214 36 0.09 690
MMC449 6,772,788 496,052 288 -60/135 160 190 30 0.06 740
MMC449 220 240 20 0.11 520
MMC496 6,772,646 496,026 226 -60/135 88 114 26 0.13 570
MMC496 136 180 44 0.07 480
MMC499 6,772,474 496,137 150 -60/135 70 90 20 0.13 500
MMC500 6,772,510 496,110 174 -60/135 76 104 28 0.12 500
MMC503 6,772,343 496,109 130 -60/135 0 32 32 0.11 440
MMC504 6,772,375 496,069 156 -60/135 42 60 18 0.15 660
MMC505 6,772,387 496,055 156 -60/135 54 72 18 0.13 940
MMC526 6,772,534 496,083 180 -60/135 84 122 38 0.11 470
MMC527 6,772,547 496,069 186 -70/135 104 142 38 0.11 840
MMC528 6,772,588 496,026 204 -60/135 82 122 40 0.09 560
MMC528 126 170 44 0.08 550
MMC532 6,772,472 496,247 108 -60/135 0 38 38 0.08 580
MMC533 6,772,603 496,292 132 -60/135 0 34 34 0.13 390
MMC533 38 64 26 0.13 730
MMC535 6,772,651 496,357 102 -60/135 0 58 58 0.12 640
2m cone split RC samples were submitted to Bureau Veritas Minerals Pty Ltd, Canning Vale WA for WO3 by XRF and Mo by Laser Ablation
ICP-MS. Lower cut-off grade 200 ppm Mo with up to 2m of interval waste, no top cut grade. True thickness is 90 - 100% of intersection length
for inclined holes. Grid coordinates are MGA Zone 50.

Page 7

Table 4 – Better gold mineralisation in infill drilling at Mulgine Trench

Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Gold Mineralisation (at 0.10 ppm Au cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Gold Mineralisation (at 0.10 ppm Au cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Gold Mineralisation (at 0.10 ppm Au cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Gold Mineralisation (at 0.10 ppm Au cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Gold Mineralisation (at 0.10 ppm Au cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Gold Mineralisation (at 0.10 ppm Au cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Gold Mineralisation (at 0.10 ppm Au cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Gold Mineralisation (at 0.10 ppm Au cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Gold Mineralisation (at 0.10 ppm Au cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Gold Mineralisation (at 0.10 ppm Au cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Gold Mineralisation (at 0.10 ppm Au cut off)
Hole No MGA Coordinates Intersections
Northing
(m)
Easting
(m)
Depth
(m)
Dip/
Azim
From
(m)
To
(m)
Interval
(m)
Au
(ppm)
**WO3 ** Mo Ag
(ppm)
(%) (ppm)
MMC498 6,772,458 496,152 143 -50/135 6 30 24 0.58 0.10 280 3.6
MMC499 6,772,474 496,137 150 -60/135 4 40 36 0.70 0.07 150 6.6
MMC503 6,772,343 496,109 130 -60/135 0 36 36 0.69 0.10 400 3.0
MMC504 6,772,375 496,069 156 -60/135 8 40 32 0.30 0.10 320 6.2
MMC504 50 72 22 0.38 0.13 490 6.9
MMC504 82 114 32 0.32 0.05 80 2.6
MMC504 130 156 26 0.35 0.06 190 1.3
MMC505 6,772,387 496,055 156 -60/135 58 82 24 0.65 0.12 750 8.6
MMC507 6,772,448 495,997 198 -60/135 114 148 34 0.35 0.06 180 3.2
MMC507 170 198 28 0.49 0.03 210 2.5
MMC508 6,772,476 495,966 210 -60/135 166 210 44 0.36 0.05 160 2.4
MMC509 6,772,506 495,936 234 -60/135 202 234 32 0.62 0.03 170 1.9
MMC511 6,772,276 496,055 132 -60/135 62 96 34 0.30 0.07 60 2.5
MMC512 6,772,306 496,026 140 -60/135 112 120 8 1.52 0.04 60 6.6
MMC531 6,772,531 495,967 216 -60/135 180 216 36 0.41 0.06 110 2.9
MMC532 6,772,472 496,247 108 -60/135 22 34 12 0.52 0.07 670 1.3
MMC533 6,772,603 496,292 132 -60/135 122 132 10 1.62 0.03 160 6.9
MMC534 6,772,589 496,362 84 -60/135 74 84 10 0.61 0.03 230 4.1
2m cone split RC samples were submitted to Bureau Veritas Minerals Pty Ltd, Canning Vale WA for WO3 by XRF, Mo and Ag by Laser Ablation
ICP-MS finish and Au by 40g Fire Assay –ICP-AES finish. Lower cut-off grade 0.10 ppm Au with up to 2m of interval waste, no top cut grade.
True thickness is 90 - 100% of intersection length for inclined holes. Grid coordinates are MGA Zone 50.

2m cone split RC samples were submitted to Bureau Veritas Minerals Pty Ltd, Canning Vale WA for WO3 by XRF, Mo and Ag by Laser Ablation ICP-MS finish and Au by 40g Fire Assay –ICP-AES finish. Lower cut-off grade 0.10 ppm Au with up to 2m of interval waste, no top cut grade. True thickness is 90 - 100% of intersection length for inclined holes. Grid coordinates are MGA Zone 50.

Page 8

-ENDS-

For further information: Craig Ferrier Mark Pitts Chief Executive Officer Company Secretary Ph: +61 8 9486 8492 Ph: +61 8 9316 9100 E: [email protected] E: [email protected]

This ASX announcement was authorised for release by Craig Ferrier, Chief Executive Officer of Tungsten Mining NL.

Competent Person’s Statement

The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results and Data Quality is based on, and fairly represents, information and supporting documentation prepared by Peter Bleakley, who is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Bleakley is not a full-time employee of the company. Mr Bleakley is a consultant to the mining industry. Mr Bleakley has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Bleakley consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

The information in this report that relates to the Mulgine Trench Mineral Resource is extracted from the report titled ‘Major Mineral Resource Estimate Update for Mulgine Trench Deposit’ released to the ASX on 19 December 2019, available to view at www.tungstenmining.com. Tungsten Mining have drilled an additional 146 RC holes into the Mulgine Trench Mineral Resource. Interpretation of all new data is proceeding and a revised estimate is planned for release in April 2020. Other than the aforementioned review, the Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the ASX announcement and that all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the estimates in original ASX announcements continue to apply and have not materially changed. The Company confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person's findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original ASX announcements.

About Tungsten Mining

Australian tungsten developer, Tungsten Mining NL is an Australian based resources company listed on the Australian Securities Exchange. The Company’s prime focus is the exploration and development of tungsten projects in Australia.

Tungsten (chemical symbol W), occurs naturally on Earth, not in its pure form but as a constituent of other minerals, only two of which support commercial extraction and processing - wolframite ((Fe, Mn) WO4) and scheelite (CaWO4).

Tungsten has the highest melting point of all elements except carbon – around 3400°C giving it excellent high temperature mechanical properties and the lowest expansion coefficient of all metals. Tungsten is a metal of considerable strategic importance, essential to modern industrial development (across aerospace and defence, electronics, automotive, extractive and construction sectors) with uses in cemented carbides, high-speed steels and super alloys, tungsten mill products and chemicals.

Through exploration and acquisition, the Company has established a globally significant tungsten resource inventory in its portfolio of advanced mineral projects across Australia. This provides the platform for the Company to become a major player within the global primary tungsten market through the development of lowcost tungsten concentrate production.

Page 9

Appendix 1

Intersections greater than 3 metres at 0.05% WO3 in Mulgine Trench Drilling

Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Tungsten Mineralisation ( Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Tungsten Mineralisation ( Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Tungsten Mineralisation ( Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Tungsten Mineralisation ( Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Tungsten Mineralisation ( Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Tungsten Mineralisation ( >3m at 0.05% WO3 cut off) >3m at 0.05% WO3 cut off) >3m at 0.05% WO3 cut off)
Hole No MGA Coordinates Intersections
Northing
(m)
Easting
(m)
RL
(m)
Depth
(m)
Dip/
Azim
From
(m)
To Interval
(m)
WO3
(%)
Mo
(ppm)
(m)
MMC448 6,772,760 496,081 395 270 -60/135 14 18 4 0.08 40
MMC448 36 46 10 0.07 80
MMC448 52 208 156 0.11 320
MMC448 218 222 4 0.09 390
MMC448 226 244 18 0.11 190
MMC448 248 252 4 0.10 170
MMC449 6,772,788 496,052 394 288 -60/135 18 24 6 0.07 20
MMC449 58 62 4 0.09 30
MMC449 82 86 4 0.06 40
MMC449 90 176 86 0.11 250
MMC449 182 202 20 0.12 340
MMC449 206 210 4 0.11 330
MMC449 214 248 34 0.11 400
MMC449 260 278 18 0.11 670
MMC449 282 288 6 0.11 140
MMC450 6,772,393 496,225 406 78 -60/135 0 24 24 0.09 290
MMC450 66 72 6 0.12 110
MMC496 6,772,646 496,026 395 226 -60/135 10 28 18 0.07 40
MMC496 48 118 70 0.12 280
MMC496 122 148 26 0.09 240
MMC496 160 176 16 0.08 490
MMC496 186 214 28 0.12 240
MMC498 6,772,458 496,152 412 143 -50/135 2 28 26 0.09 310
MMC498 32 46 14 0.07 180
MMC498 52 78 26 0.12 410
MMC498 108 116 8 0.10 100
MMC498 122 126 4 0.08 70
MMC498 132 138 6 0.23 100
MMC499 6,772,474 496,137 410 150 -60/135 0 8 8 0.14 240
MMC499 14 24 10 0.08 100
MMC499 34 38 4 0.09 270
MMC499 42 52 10 0.08 100
MMC499 58 82 24 0.14 430
MMC499 86 94 8 0.14 170
MMC499 136 142 6 0.53 110
MMC500 6,772,510 496,110 406 174 -60/135 0 38 38 0.12 120
MMC500 42 46 4 0.08 990
MMC500 56 100 44 0.11 350
MMC500 152 158 6 0.15 70
MMC500 164 172 8 0.16 160

Page 10

Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Tungsten Mineralisation ( Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Tungsten Mineralisation ( Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Tungsten Mineralisation ( Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Tungsten Mineralisation ( Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Tungsten Mineralisation ( Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Tungsten Mineralisation ( >3m at 0.05% WO3 cut off) >3m at 0.05% WO3 cut off) >3m at 0.05% WO3 cut off)
Hole No MGA Coordinates Intersections
Northing
(m)
Easting
(m)
RL
(m)
Depth
(m)
Dip/
Azim
From
(m)
To Interval
(m)
WO3
(%)
Mo
(ppm)
(m)
MMC503 6,772,343 496,109 406 130 -60/135 4 38 34 0.11 350
MMC503 40 46 6 0.07 260
MMC503 50 54 4 0.08 100
MMC504 6,772,375 496,069 403 156 -60/135 0 90 90 0.11 320
MMC504 120 124 4 0.11 250
MMC504 132 138 6 0.16 200
MMC505 6,772,387 496,055 402 156 -60/135 2 14 12 0.09 200
MMC505 16 30 14 0.06 190
MMC505 36 72 36 0.11 780
MMC505 76 100 24 0.09 130
MMC505 130 134 4 0.12 170
MMC506 6,772,400 496,046 401 126 -75/135 22 36 14 0.10 290
MMC506 52 62 10 0.10 440
MMC506 66 76 10 0.19 270
MMC506 86 112 26 0.10 190
MMC506 120 124 4 0.17 60
MMC507 6,772,448 495,997 397 198 -60/135 4 22 18 0.08 50
MMC507 26 30 4 0.07 170
MMC507 36 60 24 0.13 370
MMC507 72 102 30 0.07 270
MMC507 106 110 4 0.06 920
MMC507 116 124 8 0.09 280
MMC507 136 148 12 0.09 110
MMC507 162 168 6 0.47 80
MMC507 188 192 4 0.07 230
MMC508 6,772,476 495,966 395 210 -60/135 8 44 36 0.13 120
MMC508 48 52 4 0.09 150
MMC508 56 62 6 0.08 200
MMC508 64 70 6 0.10 150
MMC508 74 100 26 0.08 280
MMC508 106 128 22 0.10 360
MMC508 138 146 8 0.06 210
MMC508 156 162 6 0.13 340
MMC508 174 178 4 0.08 90
MMC508 202 206 4 0.07 480
MMC509 6,772,506 495,936 393 234 -60/135 48 74 26 0.11 110
MMC509 78 82 4 0.09 140
MMC509 100 108 8 0.07 150
MMC509 114 128 14 0.08 200
MMC509 134 144 10 0.25 260
MMC509 148 160 12 0.11 280
MMC509 168 178 10 0.17 200
MMC510 6,772,334 496,054 399 138 -65/135 2 52 50 0.12 400

Page 11

Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Tungsten Mineralisation ( Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Tungsten Mineralisation ( Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Tungsten Mineralisation ( Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Tungsten Mineralisation ( Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Tungsten Mineralisation ( Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Tungsten Mineralisation ( >3m at 0.05% WO3 cut off) >3m at 0.05% WO3 cut off) >3m at 0.05% WO3 cut off)
Hole No MGA Coordinates Intersections
Northing
(m)
Easting
(m)
RL
(m)
Depth
(m)
Dip/
Azim
From
(m)
To Interval
(m)
WO3
(%)
Mo
(ppm)
(m)
MMC511 6,772,276 496,055 395 132 -60/135 30 48 18 0.08 220
MMC511 50 68 18 0.12 110
MMC511 76 88 12 0.10 70
MMC512 6,772,306 496,026 394 140 -60/135 68 76 8 0.09 160
MMC512 80 102 22 0.09 140
MMC512 124 134 10 0.15 150
MMC513 6,772,335 495,996 394 162 -60/135 6 24 18 0.08 320
MMC513 28 44 16 0.07 270
MMC526 6,772,534 496,083 403 180 -60/135 0 42 42 0.13 170
MMC526 46 56 10 0.12 70
MMC526 62 68 6 0.23 60
MMC526 76 134 58 0.12 360
MMC526 170 174 4 0.08 40
MMC527 6,772,547 496,069 401 186 -70/135 0 72 72 0.11 250
MMC527 76 84 8 0.09 40
MMC527 116 156 40 0.15 710
MMC527 166 182 16 0.14 50
MMC528 6,772,588 496,026 397 204 -60/135 10 22 12 0.09 130
MMC528 26 126 100 0.10 280
MMC528 132 144 12 0.10 640
MMC528 148 156 8 0.15 510
MMC528 158 168 10 0.07 360
MMC528 180 186 6 0.17 90
MMC528 190 198 8 0.12 30
MMC529 6,772,617 495,996 394 222 -60/135 24 28 4 0.05 30
MMC529 42 50 8 0.09 150
MMC529 56 64 8 0.09 80
MMC529 68 90 22 0.13 70
MMC529 94 100 6 0.13 260
MMC529 104 118 14 0.11 370
MMC529 122 156 34 0.10 220
MMC529 164 170 6 0.10 730
MMC529 190 202 12 0.08 160
MMC529 206 212 6 0.21 90
MMC530 6,772,504 495,997 397 210 -60/135 0 52 52 0.09 140
MMC530 62 74 12 0.08 80
MMC530 80 84 4 0.08 120
MMC530 88 92 4 0.12 100
MMC530 96 124 28 0.08 460
MMC530 130 152 22 0.21 280
MMC530 160 164 4 0.06 50
MMC530 172 188 16 0.08 50
MMC531 6,772,531 495,967 394 216 -60/135 30 40 10 0.06 60

Page 12

Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Tungsten Mineralisation (>3m at 0.05% WO3 cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Tungsten Mineralisation (>3m at 0.05% WO3 cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Tungsten Mineralisation (>3m at 0.05% WO3 cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Tungsten Mineralisation (>3m at 0.05% WO3 cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Tungsten Mineralisation (>3m at 0.05% WO3 cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Tungsten Mineralisation (>3m at 0.05% WO3 cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Tungsten Mineralisation (>3m at 0.05% WO3 cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Tungsten Mineralisation (>3m at 0.05% WO3 cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Tungsten Mineralisation (>3m at 0.05% WO3 cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Tungsten Mineralisation (>3m at 0.05% WO3 cut off)
Hole No MGA Coordinates Intersections
Northing
(m)
Easting
(m)
RL
(m)
Depth
(m)
Dip/
Azim
From
(m)
To Interval
(m)
WO3
(%)
Mo
(ppm)
(m)
MMC531 50 64 14 0.12 90
MMC531 68 96 28 0.10 70
MMC531 106 114 8 0.07 230
MMC531 126 132 6 0.10 320
MMC531 134 138 4 0.06 420
MMC531 144 150 6 0.10 400
MMC531 156 178 22 0.09 250
MMC531 204 208 4 0.29 120
MMC532 6,772,472 496,247 411 108 -60/135 0 48 48 0.09 490
MMC532 56 68 12 0.07 150
MMC532 82 86 4 0.11 120
MMC533 6,772,603 496,292 402 132 -60/135 0 50 50 0.14 530
MMC533 54 72 18 0.14 330
MMC533 78 92 14 0.16 230
MMC533 96 104 8 0.25 110
MMC534 6,772,589 496,362 404 84 -60/135 0 26 26 0.09 690
MMC534 28 40 12 0.08 190
MMC534 44 74 30 0.07 240
MMC535 6,772,651 496,357 405 102 -60/135 0 52 52 0.12 660
MMC535 56 60 4 0.07 240
MMC535 82 94 12 0.07 140
2m cone split RC samples were submitted to Bureau Veritas Minerals Pty Ltd, Canning Vale WA for WO3 by XRF and Mo by Laser Ablation ICP-
MS. Lower cut-off grade 0.05% WO3 with up to 2m of interval waste, no top cut grade. True thickness is 90 - 100% of intersection length for
inclined holes. Grid coordinates are MGA Zone 50.

Page 13

Appendix 2

Intersections greater than 2 metres at 200 ppm Mo in Mulgine Trench Drilling

Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Molybdenum Mineralisation (>3m at 200 ppm Mo cut off) Trench Drilling - Significant Molybdenum Mineralisation (>3m at 200 ppm Mo cut off) Trench Drilling - Significant Molybdenum Mineralisation (>3m at 200 ppm Mo cut off) Trench Drilling - Significant Molybdenum Mineralisation (>3m at 200 ppm Mo cut off) Trench Drilling - Significant Molybdenum Mineralisation (>3m at 200 ppm Mo cut off) Trench Drilling - Significant Molybdenum Mineralisation (>3m at 200 ppm Mo cut off) Trench Drilling - Significant Molybdenum Mineralisation (>3m at 200 ppm Mo cut off) Trench Drilling - Significant Molybdenum Mineralisation (>3m at 200 ppm Mo cut off)
Hole No MGA Coordinates Intersections
Northing
(m)
Easting
(m)
RL
(m)
Depth
(m)
Dip/
Azim
From
(m)
To Interval
(m)
WO3
(%)
Mo
(ppm)
(m)
MMC448 6,772,760 496,081 395 270 -60/135 106 120 14 0.11 290
MMC448 130 144 14 0.10 530
MMC448 148 164 16 0.09 680
MMC448 178 214 36 0.09 690
MMC448 220 228 8 0.07 530
MMC448 234 242 8 0.14 260
MMC448 264 270 6 0.05 310
MMC449 6,772,788 496,052 394 288 -60/135 98 102 4 0.21 260
MMC449 160 190 30 0.06 740
MMC449 198 216 18 0.06 470
MMC449 220 240 20 0.11 520
MMC449 268 278 10 0.07 1140
MMC450 6,772,393 496,225 406 78 -60/135 0 10 10 0.12 490
MMC496 6,772,646 496,026 395 226 -60/135 88 114 26 0.13 570
MMC496 128 132 4 0.08 390
MMC496 136 180 44 0.07 480
MMC496 200 210 10 0.11 400
MMC498 6,772,458 496,152 412 143 -50/135 0 6 6 0.05 540
MMC498 14 30 16 0.08 350
MMC498 42 64 22 0.10 410
MMC498 68 78 10 0.10 420
MMC498 86 94 8 0.01 330
MMC499 6,772,474 496,137 410 150 -60/135 0 4 4 0.17 360
MMC499 54 60 6 0.04 490
MMC499 70 90 20 0.13 500
MMC499 96 104 8 0.04 360
MMC499 130 134 4 0.01 230
MMC500 6,772,510 496,110 406 174 -60/135 4 8 4 0.20 360
MMC500 42 50 8 0.05 720
MMC500 54 62 8 0.06 270
MMC500 76 104 28 0.12 500
MMC500 110 114 4 0.03 550
MMC503 6,772,343 496,109 406 130 -60/135 0 32 32 0.11 440
MMC503 36 46 10 0.06 240
MMC504 6,772,375 496,069 403 156 -60/135 0 20 20 0.09 330
MMC504 24 38 14 0.10 400
MMC504 42 60 18 0.15 660
MMC504 68 72 4 0.07 210
MMC504 114 118 4 0.05 360
MMC504 140 148 8 0.02 290

Page 14

Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Molybdenum Mineralisation (>3m at 200 ppm Mo cut off) Trench Drilling - Significant Molybdenum Mineralisation (>3m at 200 ppm Mo cut off) Trench Drilling - Significant Molybdenum Mineralisation (>3m at 200 ppm Mo cut off) Trench Drilling - Significant Molybdenum Mineralisation (>3m at 200 ppm Mo cut off) Trench Drilling - Significant Molybdenum Mineralisation (>3m at 200 ppm Mo cut off) Trench Drilling - Significant Molybdenum Mineralisation (>3m at 200 ppm Mo cut off) Trench Drilling - Significant Molybdenum Mineralisation (>3m at 200 ppm Mo cut off) Trench Drilling - Significant Molybdenum Mineralisation (>3m at 200 ppm Mo cut off)
Hole No MGA Coordinates Intersections
Northing
(m)
Easting
(m)
RL
(m)
Depth
(m)
Dip/
Azim
From
(m)
To Interval
(m)
WO3
(%)
Mo
(ppm)
(m)
MMC505 6,772,387 496,055 402 156 -60/135 0 4 4 0.07 310
MMC505 24 32 8 0.06 390
MMC505 36 48 12 0.09 860
MMC505 54 72 18 0.13 940
MMC506 6,772,400 496,046 401 126 -75/135 22 34 12 0.10 320
MMC506 40 62 22 0.06 620
MMC506 74 82 8 0.05 1570
MMC506 94 100 6 0.10 440
MMC507 6,772,448 495,997 397 198 -60/135 44 52 8 0.22 780
MMC507 56 60 4 0.08 350
MMC507 66 70 4 0.03 430
MMC507 80 84 4 0.05 430
MMC507 88 96 8 0.08 480
MMC507 102 122 20 0.06 770
MMC507 188 192 4 0.07 230
MMC508 6,772,476 495,966 395 210 -60/135 2 8 6 0.04 260
MMC508 64 68 4 0.06 220
MMC508 76 80 4 0.12 910
MMC508 108 136 28 0.08 370
MMC508 140 144 4 0.05 340
MMC508 158 162 4 0.07 420
MMC508 190 198 8 0.04 260
MMC508 200 206 6 0.05 420
MMC509 6,772,506 495,936 393 234 -60/135 94 104 10 0.04 260
MMC509 116 120 4 0.08 340
MMC509 128 132 4 0.05 250
MMC509 138 150 12 0.07 350
MMC509 154 160 6 0.14 380
MMC509 172 176 4 0.26 370
MMC509 216 228 12 0.04 270
MMC510 6,772,334 496,054 399 138 -65/135 2 20 18 0.08 560
MMC510 24 30 6 0.11 300
MMC510 34 48 14 0.18 500
MMC511 6,772,276 496,055 395 132 -60/135 0 10 10 0.00 240
MMC511 32 42 10 0.08 320
MMC512 6,772,306 496,026 394 140 -60/135 4 8 4 0.03 260
MMC512 96 102 6 0.11 260
MMC513 6,772,335 495,996 394 162 -60/135 2 22 20 0.07 350
MMC513 36 44 8 0.07 410
MMC513 60 66 6 0.04 470
MMC526 6,772,534 496,083 403 180 -60/135 0 8 8 0.14 310
MMC526 38 46 8 0.08 260
MMC526 74 80 6 0.08 340

Page 15

Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Molybdenum Mineralisation (>3m at 200 ppm Mo cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Molybdenum Mineralisation (>3m at 200 ppm Mo cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Molybdenum Mineralisation (>3m at 200 ppm Mo cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Molybdenum Mineralisation (>3m at 200 ppm Mo cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Molybdenum Mineralisation (>3m at 200 ppm Mo cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Molybdenum Mineralisation (>3m at 200 ppm Mo cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Molybdenum Mineralisation (>3m at 200 ppm Mo cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Molybdenum Mineralisation (>3m at 200 ppm Mo cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Molybdenum Mineralisation (>3m at 200 ppm Mo cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Molybdenum Mineralisation (>3m at 200 ppm Mo cut off)
Hole No MGA Coordinates Intersections
Northing
(m)
Easting
(m)
RL
(m)
Depth
(m)
Dip/
Azim
From
(m)
To Interval
(m)
WO3
(%)
Mo
(ppm)
(m)
MMC526 84 122 38 0.11 470
MMC526 134 138 4 0.04 420
MMC527 6,772,547 496,069 401 186 -70/135 0 16 16 0.10 280
MMC527 48 58 10 0.12 400
MMC527 62 72 10 0.08 570
MMC527 86 90 4 0.04 370
MMC527 96 100 4 0.02 550
MMC527 104 142 38 0.11 840
MMC528 6,772,588 496,026 397 204 -60/135 82 122 40 0.09 560
MMC528 126 170 44 0.08 550
MMC529 6,772,617 495,996 394 222 -60/135 0 4 4 0.03 400
MMC529 94 98 4 0.13 350
MMC529 108 116 8 0.13 540
MMC529 122 126 4 0.05 420
MMC529 136 150 14 0.12 300
MMC529 158 194 36 0.05 510
MMC530 6,772,504 495,997 397 210 -60/135 0 8 8 0.07 310
MMC530 24 28 4 0.14 230
MMC530 82 86 4 0.07 340
MMC530 100 128 28 0.07 500
MMC530 132 144 12 0.29 370
MMC531 6,772,531 495,967 394 216 -60/135 110 114 4 0.06 360
MMC531 124 150 26 0.07 480
MMC531 154 162 8 0.08 520
MMC532 6,772,472 496,247 411 108 -60/135 0 38 38 0.08 580
MMC532 46 52 6 0.11 310
MMC532 60 64 4 0.07 320
MMC533 6,772,603 496,292 402 132 -60/135 0 34 34 0.13 390
MMC533 38 64 26 0.13 730
MMC533 70 74 4 0.06 320
MMC533 86 94 8 0.14 450
MMC533 126 130 4 0.02 230
MMC534 6,772,589 496,362 404 84 -60/135 0 30 30 0.09 630
MMC534 44 56 12 0.07 250
MMC534 64 70 6 0.09 440
MMC534 74 80 6 0.04 280
MMC535 6,772,651 496,357 405 102 -60/135 0 58 58 0.12 640
MMC535 62 72 10 0.04 1140
MMC535 90 100 10 0.06 460
2m cone split RC samples submitted to Bureau Veritas Minerals Pty Ltd, Canning Vale WA for WO3 by XRF and Mo by Laser Ablation ICP-
MS. Lower cut-off grade 200 ppm Mo with up to 3m of interval waste, no top cut grade. True thickness is 90 - 100% of intersection length
for inclined holes. Grid coordinates are MGA Zone 50.

Page 16

Appendix 3

Intersections greater than 10 metres at 0.10 ppm Au in Mulgine Trench Drilling

Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Gold Mineralisation (at 0.10 ppm Au cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Gold Mineralisation (at 0.10 ppm Au cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Gold Mineralisation (at 0.10 ppm Au cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Gold Mineralisation (at 0.10 ppm Au cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Gold Mineralisation (at 0.10 ppm Au cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Gold Mineralisation (at 0.10 ppm Au cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Gold Mineralisation (at 0.10 ppm Au cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Gold Mineralisation (at 0.10 ppm Au cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Gold Mineralisation (at 0.10 ppm Au cut off)
Hole No MGA Coordinates Intersections
Northing
(m)
Easting
(m)
Depth
(m)
Dip/
Azim
From
(m)
To
(m)
Interval
(m)
Au
(ppm)
WO3
Mo
Ag
(pp
m)
(%) (ppm)
MMC448 6,772,760 496,081 270 -60/135 176 214 38 0.17 0.10 660 6.7
MMC448 256 270 14 0.42 0.05 230 2.2
MMC449 6,772,788 496,052 288 -60/135 116 130 14 0.29 0.13 60 6.8
MMC449 146 156 10 0.15 0.13 100 10.8
MMC449 200 222 22 0.18 0.10 380 5.8
MMC449 266 288 22 0.43 0.09 580 5.8
MMC450 6,772,393 496,225 78 -60/135 24 36 12 0.15 0.03 90 1.7
MMC450 40 56 16 0.20 0.03 70 2.3
MMC496 6,772,646 496,026 226 -60/135 84 102 18 0.31 0.15 410 8.9
MMC496 134 144 10 0.23 0.09 250 14.3
MMC496 186 222 36 0.22 0.10 220 3.0
MMC498 6,772,458 496,152 143 -50/135 6 30 24 0.58 0.10 280 3.6
MMC498 34 46 12 0.18 0.07 180 4.7
MMC498 70 80 10 0.21 0.09 370 4.6
MMC498 122 143 21 0.25 0.10 90 1.4
MMC499 6,772,474 496,137 150 -60/135 4 40 36 0.70 0.07 150 6.6
MMC499 50 64 14 0.20 0.06 290 6.1
MMC499 78 90 12 0.25 0.15 380 5.4
MMC499 124 144 20 0.38 0.17 120 2.2
MMC500 6,772,510 496,110 174 -60/135 26 36 10 0.16 0.09 130 5.4
MMC500 40 72 32 0.24 0.06 310 9.2
MMC500 88 98 10 0.31 0.19 410 7.8
MMC500 130 140 10 0.21 0.04 40 1.4
MMC503 6,772,343 496,109 130 -60/135 0 36 36 0.69 0.10 400 3.0
MMC504 6,772,375 496,069 156 -60/135 8 40 32 0.30 0.10 320 6.2
MMC504 50 72 22 0.38 0.13 490 6.9
MMC504 82 114 32 0.32 0.05 80 2.6
MMC504 130 156 26 0.35 0.06 190 1.3
MMC505 6,772,387 496,055 156 -60/135 0 12 12 0.51 0.08 220 2.0
MMC505 26 38 12 0.21 0.05 400 7.1
MMC505 58 82 24 0.65 0.12 750 8.6
MMC505 96 108 12 0.38 0.09 80 3.9
MMC505 112 122 10 0.34 0.04 40 2.0
MMC505 126 156 30 0.23 0.04 160 1.3
MMC506 6,772,400 496,046 126 -75/135 34 52 18 0.19 0.04 560 7.7
MMC506 66 78 12 0.29 0.16 860 5.3
MMC506 100 120 20 0.17 0.07 130 1.9
MMC507 6,772,448 495,997 198 -60/135 50 60 10 0.20 0.17 230 12.5
MMC507 114 148 34 0.35 0.06 180 3.2
MMC507 170 198 28 0.49 0.03 210 2.5
MMC508 6,772,476 495,966 210 -60/135 132 150 18 0.19 0.05 210 3.9
MMC508 166 210 44 0.36 0.05 160 2.4
MMC509 6,772,506 495,936 234 -60/135 50 60 10 0.30 0.11 100 7.5

Page 17

Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Gold Mineralisation (at 0.10 ppm Au cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Gold Mineralisation (at 0.10 ppm Au cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Gold Mineralisation (at 0.10 ppm Au cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Gold Mineralisation (at 0.10 ppm Au cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Gold Mineralisation (at 0.10 ppm Au cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Gold Mineralisation (at 0.10 ppm Au cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Gold Mineralisation (at 0.10 ppm Au cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Gold Mineralisation (at 0.10 ppm Au cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Gold Mineralisation (at 0.10 ppm Au cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Gold Mineralisation (at 0.10 ppm Au cut off) Mulgine Trench Drilling - Significant Gold Mineralisation (at 0.10 ppm Au cut off)
Hole No MGA Coordinates Intersections
Northing
(m)
Easting
(m)
Depth
(m)
Dip/
Azim
From
(m)
To
(m)
Interval
(m)
Au
(ppm)
WO3
Mo
Ag
(pp
m)
(%) (ppm)
MMC509 116 140 24 0.19 0.14 200 6.0
MMC509 144 166 22 0.29 0.07 260 7.0
MMC509 170 180 10 0.16 0.14 210 2.9
MMC509 202 234 32 0.62 0.03 170 1.9
MMC510 6,772,334 496,054 138 -65/135 0 24 24 0.39 0.08 460 4.0
MMC510 40 48 8 0.56 0.22 650 8.8
MMC511 6,772,276 496,055 132 -60/135 32 44 12 0.20 0.09 300 4.6
MMC511 62 96 34 0.30 0.07 60 2.5
MMC511 102 108 6 0.63 0.01 210 1.9
MMC511 118 132 14 0.21 0.02 100 1.2
MMC512 6,772,306 496,026 140 -60/135 68 84 16 0.14 0.07 150 2.3
MMC512 112 120 8 1.52 0.04 60 6.6
MMC512 126 130 4 0.51 0.29 150 2.1
MMC526 6,772,534 496,083 180 -60/135 16 34 18 0.36 0.16 130 6.9
MMC526 148 160 12 0.22 0.05 80 1.7
MMC526 170 180 10 0.13 0.05 60 1.2
MMC527 6,772,547 496,069 186 -70/135 30 42 12 0.28 0.10 130 7.1
MMC527 116 154 38 0.21 0.15 750 7.4
MMC527 176 186 10 0.30 0.15 60 2.7
MMC528 6,772,588 496,026 204 -60/135 30 34 4 1.44 0.10 100 21.6
MMC528 58 82 24 0.21 0.14 90 8.4
MMC528 138 156 18 0.20 0.11 830 11.0
MMC528 164 186 22 0.20 0.09 170 2.8
MMC528 190 204 14 0.35 0.22 70 1.3
MMC529 6,772,617 495,996 222 -60/135 118 128 10 0.13 0.05 200 4.9
MMC529 148 156 8 0.62 0.12 170 14.0
MMC529 160 170 10 0.36 0.08 990 17.8
MMC529 174 196 22 0.16 0.05 260 3.4
MMC529 202 222 20 0.29 0.08 90 2.5
MMC530 6,772,504 495,997 210 -60/135 24 40 16 0.21 0.12 140 6.3
MMC530 98 118 20 0.19 0.07 470 7.8
MMC530 130 152 22 0.25 0.21 280 8.8
MMC530 180 204 24 0.19 0.06 50 1.6
MMC531 6,772,531 495,967 216 -60/135 136 148 12 0.19 0.06 590 7.6
MMC531 158 178 20 0.14 0.08 220 4.3
MMC531 180 216 36 0.41 0.06 110 2.9
MMC532 6,772,472 496,247 108 -60/135 22 34 12 0.52 0.07 670 1.3
MMC532 94 104 10 0.18 0.04 40 1.6
MMC533 6,772,603 496,292 132 -60/135 26 34 8 0.69 0.08 340 5.4
MMC533 38 52 14 0.11 0.15 990 4.3
MMC533 122 132 10 1.62 0.03 160 6.9
MMC534 6,772,589 496,362 84 -60/135 18 22 4 0.27 0.05 1070 2.2
MMC534 74 84 10 0.61 0.03 230 4.1
MMC535 6,772,651 496,357 102 -60/135 0 14 14 0.25 0.13 570 1.5
MMC535 82 94 12 0.26 0.07 140 8.3
2m cone split RC samples were submitted to Bureau Veritas Minerals Pty Ltd, Canning Vale WA for WO3 by XRF, Mo and Ag by Laser
Ablation ICP-MS finish and Au by 40g Fire Assay –ICP-AES finish. . Lower cut-off grade 0.10 ppm Au with up to 2m of interval waste, no top
cut grade. True thickness is 90 - 100% of intersection length for inclined holes. Grid coordinates are MGA Zone 50.

2m cone split RC samples were submitted to Bureau Veritas Minerals Pty Ltd, Canning Vale WA for WO3 by XRF, Mo and Ag by Laser Ablation ICP-MS finish and Au by 40g Fire Assay –ICP-AES finish. . Lower cut-off grade 0.10 ppm Au with up to 2m of interval waste, no top cut grade. True thickness is 90 - 100% of intersection length for inclined holes. Grid coordinates are MGA Zone 50.

Page 18

Appendix 4 - JORC Code Reporting Criteria

Section 1: Sampling Techniques and Data

Criteria JORC Code explanation
Commentary
Sampling techniques Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels,
random chips, or specific specialised industry standard
measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under
investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or
handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should
not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling.
During August 2016, TGN drilled 9 RC holes for 476 metres
and one large diameter (PQ) diamond hole for 31.6 metres at
Mulgine Trench to test tungsten mineralisation adjacent to
and beneath the Bobby McGee pit
In September 2018, TGN drilled 4 PQ diamond holes (528.2
m) into the Trench deposit to collect metallurgical samples
and twin RC and diamond holes.
From 12 July 2019 to present, the Company has drilled 280 RC
holes for 48,654 metres (47,991 metre of RC drilling, 663
metres HQ diamond tails). At the time of writing, Tungsten
Mining had received results from 262 of the 280 RC holes and
results reported in this announcement relate to 28 of these
holes.
Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample
representivity and the appropriate calibration of any
measurement tools or systems used
TGN drillhole collar locations were picked up by a licenced
surveyor using a Topcon GNSS with manufacturer’s
specifications of +/- 10mm N,E and +/15mm Z.
Downhole surveying was measured by the drill contractors
using a Champ North Seeking solid state gyroscopic system in
the drill rods. Accuracy is ±0.75° for azimuth and ±0.15° for
inclination.
Certified standards were inserted into the sample sequences
in according to TGN QAQC procedures. Duplicate samples
were collected to check repeatability of sampling and
variability or nugget effect for tungsten mineralisation.
Blanks were inserted into the sample stream behind high-
grade samples to test contamination. Results from this QAQC
sampling were considered good.
Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are
Material to the Public Report. In cases where ‘industry
standard’ work has been done this would be relatively
simple (e.g. ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to
obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to
produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases
more explanation may be required, such as where there
is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems.
Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (e.g.
submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed
information
Given the style of mineralisation present at Mulgine Trench,
Tungsten Mining ran an orientation survey to determine the
acceptability of 2m sampling intervals. From this orientation
work, it was concluded there was no discernible evidence that
increasing the downhole sample interval from one to two
metres materially impacts either accuracy or precision of the
assay results.
RC holes MMC265 – MMC291 and MMC301 – MMC309 were
sampled at 1 m intervals from the cyclone and split using a
cone splitter immediately beneath the cyclone to produce two
representative 3 - 5 kg 1m-samples in calico bags.
For all remaining holes, samples were split using a cone
splitter to produce two representative 3 - 5 kg 2m-samples in
calico bags. The bulk reject material was collected at 1 m
intervals from the cyclone and placed on the ground for
geological logging.
The cone splitter was cleaned by hosing with pressurised air
to eliminate sample contamination. Two samples were
collected; one is used for analysis and the other is retained as
a reference or for possible re-analysing / QAQC activities.
Samples from the current drilling programme were submitted
to Bureau Veritas Minerals Pty Ltd of Canningvale, WA, for a
standard XRF Tungsten Suite and 40 gram fire assay for gold
analysis. A second suite of elements including silver and
molybdenum were analysed by Laser Ablation ICP-MS.
Drilling techniques Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open-hole
hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and
details (e.g. core diameter, triple or standard tube,
depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type,
whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc).
TGN completed 280 RC drillholes with depths ranging from 6
to 309 m, averaging 170 m. RC drilling used a face-sampling
hammer that produced a nominal 140 mm diameter hole.
Eight holes were extended with HQ diamond tails (663 m).
TGN diamond and RC holes were surveyed in-rods at 20 -
30 m intervals using a North Seeking gyroscopic probe.

Page 19

Criteria JORC Code explanation
Commentary
Drill sample
recovery
Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample
recoveries and results assessed
RC and diamond recovery was visually assessed, recorded on
drill logs and considered to be acceptable.
Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and
ensure representative nature of the samples
RC samples collected by TGN were visually checked for
recovery, moisture and contamination. A cyclone and cone
splitter was used to provide a uniform sample and these were
routinely cleaned. The drill contractor blew out the hole at the
beginning of each drill rod to remove excess water and
maintain dry samples.
Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery
and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred
due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.
Ground conditions for RC drilling were good and drilling
returned consistent size samples. All RC samples were dry
and contamination would be minimal. No significant bias is
expected, and any potential bias is not considered material at
this stage.
Logging Whether core and chip samples have been geologically
and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support
appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining
studies and metallurgical studies.
TGN uses specially designed drill logs for tungsten
mineralisation to capture the geological data. During logging,
part of the RC sample is washed, logged and placed into chip
trays.
During the 2019/2020 drilling programme, a second set of
partially sieved material is stored in chip trays for mineral
identification by a near-IR spectral scanner (PANalytical
TerraSpec Halo).
The washed chip trays are stored in sea containers on site and
Halo chip trays stored at TGN’s Gnangara warehouse.
All drill data is digitally captured and stored in a central
database.
Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in
nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography.
RC chip logging included records of lithology, mineralogy,
textures, oxidation state and colour. Key minerals associated
with tungsten mineralisation and veining are recorded.
The total length and percentage of the relevant
intersections logged
All TGN drill holes were logged in full.
Sub-sampling
techniques and
sample preparation
If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half
or all core taken.
PQ metallurgical core was cut in half and then quartered by an
Almonte core saw. 1 metre samples of quarter core were
submitted to Nagrom for a standard tungsten suite by XRF
analysis.
The eight RC holes extended HQ diamond drilling was cut in
half by an Almonte core saw and 1 metre samples of half core
were submitted to Bureau Veritas Minerals Pty Ltd of Canning
Vale, WA for XRF analysis for tungsten, Laser Ablation ICP-MS
technique for silver and molybdenum and Fire Assay for gold.
If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split,
etc and whether sampled wet or dry.
TGN RC samples were collected on the rig by a cyclone.
Material was split by a cone splitter immediately beneath the
cyclone to produce two 3 - 5 kg samples.
For all sample types, the nature, quality and
appropriateness of the sample preparation technique.
Samples from the current drilling programme were submitted
to Bureau Veritas Minerals Pty Ltd of Canning Vale, WA and
dried, split if over 2.5 kg and pulverised in robotic vibrating
disc pulveriser.
Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling
stages to maximise representivity of samples.
TGN’s QAQC procedures included the insertion of field
duplicates, blanks and commercial standards. Duplicates,
blanks and standards were inserted at intervals of one in 25.
Geological logging and UV lamping was used to ensure
duplicate and blank samples were from mineralised intervals.

Page 20

Criteria JORC Code explanation
Commentary
Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is
representative of the in situ material collected,
including for instance results for field duplicate/second-
half sampling.
TGN inserted 1 in 25 RC field duplicates taken from 1 m or 2 m
cone split samples at the rig. Repeatability in RC duplicate
samples was found to be excellent for tungsten, molybdenum
and silver. Gold had a higher degrees of scatter associated
with the nuggetty nature of gold mineralisation.
Four PQ diamond holes and seven RC hole have twined other
RC and diamond drilling at Mulgine Trench. These holes
intersected similar grade and thickness of WO3, Mo, Au and Ag
mineralisation at target depths. Individual high grade zones
did demonstrate the particulate or nuggetty nature of
mineralisation present.
Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size
of the material being sampled.
Assays from duplicate samples showed a low - moderate
scatter (R20.82) for tungsten with no systematic bias. This is
consistent with the style of mineralisation present, coarse
grained scheelite associated with quartz veining.
Molybdenum and silver results from duplicate samples
showed good correlation with an R2of 0.93 and 0.92
respectively.
Gold results from duplicate samples showed a higher degree
of scatter with an R2of 0.63. This is interpreted to be related
to the nugget effect or particulate nature of gold
mineralisation at Mulgine Trench.
The larger sample size of approximately 40 kg per metre
collected by RC drilling is considered more appropriate than
small diameter diamond holes and therefore sample sizes are
considered to be acceptable to accurately represent the
tungsten, molybdenum, silver and gold mineralisation present
at Mulgine Trench
Quality of assay data
and laboratory tests
The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying
and laboratory procedures used and whether the
technique is considered partial or total.
Tungsten Mining assays samples for a tungsten suite by XRF.
XRF has proven to be a very accurate analytical technique for
a wide range of base metals, trace elements and major
constituents found in rocks and mineral materials. Glass
fusion XRF is utilised for assaying, since it provides good
accuracy and precision; it is suitable for analysis from very
low levels up to very high levels.
Gold was assayed by 40g charge lead collection fire assay with
silver used as secondary collector. Fire assay is regarded as the
preferred method for quantitative gold analysis.
For Phase 1 drilling, a suite of 40 elements including tungsten,
molybdenum and silver were assayed by Fused Bead Laser
Ablation ICP-MS. The XRF disk is laser ablated and the gas
formed is introduced to the Mass Spectrometer, providing an
ideal platform for analysis. The Fused Bead Laser Ablation
ICP-MS technique is total digestion of the sample achieved
through the fusion process, so quantifiable elemental data is
produced at detection limits that are equal if not better than
acid digest techniques.
Phase 2 holes (including results currently being reported )
were assayed for the tungsten suite by XRF, gold by fire assay
and a reduced suite of elements including molybdenum and
silver by Fused Bead Laser Ablation ICP-MS.
For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF
instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining
the analysis including instrument make and model,
reading times, calibrations factors applied and their
derivation, etc.
A handheld magnetic susceptibility meter (KT-10) was used to
measure magnetic susceptibility for every sample. Data is
stored in the database.
A near-IR spectral scanner (PANalytical TerraSpec Halo) was
utilised for mineral identification to assist in defining
geometallurgical domains in the Phase 1 2019 drilling
programme. Partially sieved material was collected, stored in
chiptrays and scanned.
Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g.
standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory
checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (i.e.
lack of bias) and precision have been established.
Field QAQC procedures for TGN sampling included the
insertion of blanks, commercial standards and duplicates at
the rate of one in 25 samples. Assay results have
demonstrated acceptable levels of accuracy and precision.

Page 21

Criteria JORC Code explanation
Commentary
Verification of
sampling and
assaying
The verification of significant intersections by either
independent or alternative company personnel.
No independent personnel have verified intersections in
drilling. TGN personnel have conducted a review of all
assaying by visual inspection of UV core photography and UV
estimates for RC drilling against the drill database.
The use of twinned holes.
TGN drilled four PQ diamond holes and 7 RC holes that
twinned existing RC and diamond drilling at Mulgine Trench.
Twin holes intersected similar widths and grades for
mineralisation. High grade zones were however found to be
variable or nuggety.
Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures,
data verification, data storage (physical and electronic)
protocols.
Logging conducted by TGN takes place at the drilling site.
Ruggedised computers are used to record the logging for RC
samples. Diamond logging is onto paper drill logs and data
entered in Perth.
A set of standard Excel templates are used to capture the data.
Data was validated on-site by the supervising geologist before
being sent to Perth office. It was then loaded into Micromine
and validated for logging codes, missing intervals, overlapping
intervals, hole location and downhole surveying. Validated
data is then loaded into a relational database for storage.
Discuss any adjustment to assay data.
No adjustments were made, other than for values below the
assay detection limit which have been entered as half of the
detection limit.
Location of data
points
Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drillholes
(collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine
workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource
estimation.
Holes drilled by TGN were picked up by a licenced surveyor
using a Topcon GNSS with manufacturer’s specifications of +/-
10mm N,E and +/15mm Z.
Downhole surveying of TGN holes was measured by the drill
contractors using a North Seeking solid state gyroscopic
system in the drill rods. Accuracy is ±0.75° for azimuth and
±0.15° for inclination.
Specification of the grid system used.
Geocentric Datum of Australia 1994 (GDA94) - Zone 50.
Quality and adequacy of topographic control.
High resolution aerial photography and digital elevation
survey was flown by Geoimage Pty Ltd on 18 February 2018
with expected height accuracy of +/- 0.5 m.
Data spacing and
distribution
Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.
Drill spacing has been closed to a 40 metre by 40 metre
pattern over areas of interest. Strike extensions are tested by
160 metres spaced section with 40 to 80 metre spaced holes.
Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient
to establish the degree of geological and grade
continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and
Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications
applied.
The drill spacing at Mulgine Trench was sufficient to define an
Inferred Mineral Resource reported in December 2019. TGN
have drilled an additional 146 holes into Mulgine Trench since
this estimate.
Whether sample compositing has been applied.
For non-mineralised intervals 1 m samples collected from the
cyclone were composited into 5 m and later 6 m composite
samples for RC drilling. Where composite samples have
anomalous tungsten and/or molybdenum, the 1 m or 2 m cone
split samples have been submitted for analysis.
Orientation of data in
relation to geological
structure
Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased
sampling of possible structures and the extent to which
this is known, considering the deposit type.
The orientation of drilling was designed to intersect
mineralisation perpendicular to the dominant vein geometry
and mineralised stratigraphy. Holes drilled at -60 degree
towards the southeast intersect dominant vein sets and
stratigraphy at 90 degrees.
If the relationship between the drilling orientation and
the orientation of key mineralised structures is
considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this
should be assessed and reported if material.
Structural logging of diamond core and structural data
collected during optical/acoustic logging of selected RC holes
has confirmed that drill orientation did not introduce any bias
regarding the orientation of mineralised veining.
Sample security The measures taken to ensure sample security.
Samples collected by TGN were securely sealed and stored on
site and delivered by courier to the laboratory in Perth.
Sample submissions forms used to track samples were
emailed directly to the laboratory.

Page 22

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Internal Company audits for both historical and current
Company drilling are carried out to ensure drilling and
sampling techniques are consistent with industry standards,
consistency of data is validated by Tungsten Mining while
loading into the database. Any data which fails the database
constraints and cannot be loaded is returned for validation.
Global consistency is audited by plotting sections using the
database and reconciling assays.
Audits or reviews The results of any audits or reviews of sampling
techniques and data.
During drilling the Company inserts standards, duplicates and
blanks into the sample stream. These QAQC samples are
periodically reviewed and any issues addressed. Tungsten
Mining also conducted a thorough review of historical data that
included checking of assay results, twinning of holes and
checking drilling against historical reports. Any errors
identified were corrected in the database.
For TGN drilling, assay results are visually compared against
UV estimates for tungsten and visual estimates.

Section 2: Reporting of Exploration Results

Criteria JORC Code explanation
Commentary
Mineral tenement
and land tenure
status
Type, reference name/number, location and
ownership including agreements or material issues
with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships,
overriding royalties, native title interests, historical
sites, wilderness or national park and environmental
settings.
The Mulgine Trench prospect is located on Mining Lease
M59/425-I covering an area of approximately 9.4 km2. TGN
has 100% of the mineral rights for tungsten and molybdenum
and to all by-products from the mining of tungsten and
molybdenum. The current registered holder of the tenement
is Minjar Gold Pty Ltd.
The normal Western Australian state royalties apply.
The Federal Court has determined that Native Title does not
exist over the area of M59/425-I in relation to Badamia claim
(Federal Court # WAD6123/1998).
M59/425-I is located on former pastoral lease ‘Warriedar
Station’ which has been purchased by the State Government
and now forms part of the Karara Rangeland Park. Other
operating mines are also located within the Park boundary.
The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting
along with any known impediments to obtaining a
licence to operate in the area.
The tenements are in good standing at the time of reporting.
Mid-West Tungsten Pty Ltd, a wholly owned subsidiary of
Tungsten Mining NL, holds a consent caveat over tenement
M59/425-I.
Exploration done by
other parties
Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by
other parties.
Tungsten Drilling
Drilling initially focused on tungsten mineralisation with
Minefields and ANZECO drilling 77 NQ/BQ diamond drillholes
(8,703 m DD, 1,871 m pre-collars) in the 1970s and 1980s.
In 2014, Minjar Ltd drilled 27 RC exploration hole (1,680 m)
northwest of the Bobby McGee and 160 RC holes (5,712 m) for
grade control in the Bobby McGee pit. Hazelwood Resources
Ltd assayed these holes for their standard XRF tungsten suite.
Gold Drilling
In 1993, focus then turned onto gold exploration and multiple
phases of dominantly RC drilling and minor diamond drilling
was completed by numerous companies to present. A total of
342 RC holes (19,429 m) and 3 diamond holes (828 m) have
been drilled to evaluate gold at Mulgine Trench. During
mining, an additional 279 RC grade control holes (8,982 m)
were drilled at the Camp and Highland Chief pits.
Exploration drilling consisting of 422 RAB (11,374 m) holes
was drilled across the Trench Deposit and strike extensions.
TGN have conducted a thorough review of all drilling and
sampling procedures.

Page 23

Criteria JORC Code explanation
Commentary
Geology Deposit type, geological setting and style of
mineralisation.
Mulgine Trench
Stratigraphy for the Mulgine Trench deposit consists of a
hangingwall amphibolites, the main mineralised horizon and
footwall greisen of the Mulgine Granite. The mineralised
horizon is a 160 to 260 metre thick zone that is delineated
over 1.4 kilometres of strike and dips shallowly (25 – 40
degrees) towards the northwest.
Tungsten and molybdenum mineralisation dominantly occurs
as scheelite and molybdenite in foliation parallel veins or
adjacent to vein margins or as coatings on fractures or
disseminated in greisen units/veins.
Drill hole
Information
A summary of all information material to the
understanding of the exploration results including a
tabulation of the following information for all Material
drill holes:

easting and northing of the drill hole collar

elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation
above sea level in metres) of the drill hole
collar

dip and azimuth of the hole

down hole length and interception depth

hole length.
Collar data for drilling is included in Appendix A.
Data aggregation
methods
In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging
techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade
truncations (e.g. cutting of high grades) and cut-off
grades are usually Material and should be stated.
To highlight the extent of mineralisation present at Mulgine
Trench, the 0.05% WO3mineralised envelope is reported in
Table 1 that includes minor zones of internal waste (<10m)
relative to the entire mineralised package. WO3and Mo
grades are reported separately for intersections.
Intersections were reported using a lower cut-off grade of
0.05% WO3. WO3and Mo grades are reported separately for
intersections. No top cut and up to 2m of internal waste were
included.
A second set of intersections were reported using a lower cut-
off grade of 200 ppm Mo. Again WO3and Mo grades are
reported separately for intersections. No top cut and up to 2m
of internal waste were included.
A third set of intersections were reported using a lower cut-off
grade of 0.10 ppm Au. WO3, Mo and Ag grades are reported
separately for these intersections. Only intersections greater
than 10m at 0.10 ppm Au were reported. No top cut and up to
2m of internal waste were included.
Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths
of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade
results, the procedure used for such aggregation
should be stated and some typical examples of such
aggregations should be shown in detail.
For reporting of tungsten intersections, all assays >1.0% WO3
are reported beneath the relevant intersection. Interval zones
of waste up to 2m wide are included in intersections provided
the adjacent zone and waste are >0.05% WO3.
The assumptions used for any reporting of metal
equivalent values should be clearly stated.
Not applicable, no metal equivalents were quoted.
Relationship
between
mineralisation
widths and intercept
lengths
These relationships are particularly important in the
reporting of Exploration Results.
If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to
the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be
reported.
If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are
reported, there should be a clear statement to this
effect (e.g. ‘down hole length, true width not known’).
Inclined holes will intersect mineralisation at between 80° -
90°. True thickness will be between 90 to 100% of the
intersection thickness for inclined holes.
Diagrams Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and
tabulations of intercepts should be included for any
significant discovery being reported These should
include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole
collar locations and appropriate sectional views.
Refer to diagrams in the body of text.

Page 24

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Balanced reporting All Intersections greater than 3m at 0.05 WO3at Mt Mulgine
are reported and holes with no significant mineralisation are
Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration documented in Appendix 1.
results is not practicable, representative reporting of
both low and high grades and/or widths should be
practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration
A second list of all Intersections greater than 3m at 200 ppm
Mo at Mt Mulgine is reported in Appendix 2.
Results. A third list of all Intersections greater than 10m at 0.10 ppm
Au at Mt Mulgine is reported in Appendix 3.
Other substantive Mineralogical and metallurgical studies on the Mulgine Trench
exploration data deposit show scheelite well liberated at coarse sized fractions
resulting in good recoveries via a simple gravity circuit.
Molybdenum was liberated at finer sized fractions and
showed high recovery and upgrades through a flotation
circuit. Comminution work showed all ore types were of
moderate to high hardness.
Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, An extensive geo-metallurgical program has commenced to
should be reported including (but not limited to): understand the range of ore types in the Trench deposit and
geological observations; geophysical survey results; their volumes. This will provide the basis to produce a
geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and representative master composite to complete the
method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk metallurgical testwork program.
density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock
characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating
substances.
Metallurgical test work has shown that the ore as represented
by the samples tested, should be readily concentrated to
exceed the target of +60% WO3concentrate. Levels of
potential deleterious contaminants reporting to the final
concentrate are expected to be below the minimum threshold
for specific APT conversion processes.
Evidence gathered to date show that no major metallurgical
problems are expected to affect the overall viability of the
project.
Further work The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g. TGN are currently undertaking a Pre-Feasibility Study on the
tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or greater Mt Mulgine Project incorporating the Mulgine Trench
large-scale step-out drilling). and Mulgine Hill deposits. Planned activities include:
Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible
extensions, including the main geological
interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this

Resource definition and infill drilling of the Trench
deposit;
information is not commercially sensitive
Mine design and optimisation of the mining
schedule, geotechnical studies and definition of
maiden ore reserves;

Metallurgical test work on the material from
Trench;

Process design and engineering for the tungsten
processing plant and associated non-process
infrastructure;

Assessment of existing and exploration for
additional ground water resources; and

Completion of native flora, fauna, aboriginal
heritage surveys and regulatory approval
processes.

Page 25