AI assistant
Tryg — Annual Report 2025
Jan 22, 2026
3389_rns_2026-01-22_91701ca5-5d42-485d-8ab6-ae061963f70d.pdf
Annual Report
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
{0}------------------------------------------------

{1}------------------------------------------------
Contents
Management's review
| Introduction | 3 | Sustainability statement | 49 |
|---|---|---|---|
| A message from the Chair and Group CEO | 4 | ESG at a glance | 50 |
| Tryg at a glance | 6 | General disclosures | 52 |
| Events in 2025 | 7 | Business model and value chain | 53 |
| Highlights 2025 | 9 | Strategy and targets | 54 |
| Financial highlights Q4 2025 | 10 | Material impacts, risks and opportunities | 55 |
| Sustainability governance | 58 | ||
| Strategy | 11 | Environment | 65 |
| United Towards '27 | 12 | Climate change | 67 |
| Progress towards 2027 ambitions | 14 | Resource use and circular economy | 81 |
| EU Taxonomy | 85 | ||
| Financial results | 16 | Social | 93 |
| Income overview | 17 | Own workforce | 95 |
| Financial outlook | 18 | Consumers and end-users | 105 |
| Tryg's results | 20 | Governance | 110 |
| Business areas | 22 | Business conduct | 112 |
| Private | 23 | Independent auditor's limited assurance report | 120 |
| Commercial | 25 | ||
| Investment activities | 27 | Financial statements | |
| Tax governance | 30 | ||
| Contents - Financial statements | 123 | ||
| Governance | 31 | Statement by the Supervisory Board and the Executive Board | 124 |
| Corporate governance | 32 | Independent Auditor's Reports | 125 |
| Capital and risk management | 36 | Tryg A/S (Parent company) | 200 |
| Investor information | 41 | Quarterly outlines | 207 |
| Supervisory Board | 43 | Group chart | 212 |
| Executive Board | 47 | Glossary, key ratios and alternative performance measures | 213 |
| Disclaimer | 215 |

{2}------------------------------------------------

{3}------------------------------------------------
A message from the Chair and Group CEO
**2025 brought a strong start to the new strategy period and strong financial results. Customer satisfaction increased, as did dividends to our shareholders, and with this report we launch a DKK 1bn share buyback programme.

Solid delivery across the Group
2025 was yet another eventful year for Tryg with clear deliveries on our commitments to customers and shareholders alike. The new strategy, United Towards '27, got off to a strong start with multiple significant achievements across all three strategic pillars. Insurance operations continued to deliver solid results with improving underlying profitability levels and higher customer satisfaction despite the still fast pace of macroeconomic and geopolitical change.
Good progress towards 2027 targets
Tryg is pleased to report strong financial results for 2025 with an insurance service result of DKK 7.9bn driven by a combined ratio of 80.3% and a return on own funds of 40.3%. Similarly, customer satisfaction rose to 82. Across financial and strategic KPIs, Tryg is very much on track to reach its 2027 targets.
Strong start to the new strategy period
Tryg had a strong start to the new strategy period. Across all three strategic pillars,
significant progress was made on reaping benefits of scale from the large and well-diversified Group that Tryg embodies. In the 'Scale & Simplicity' pillar, Tryg is particularly pleased with the expansion of its 15-year collaboration with Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), who assumed ownership of a range of Tryg's older IT systems. Within the 'Technical Excellence' pillar, the launch of a new underwriting tool and smarter risk-based scoring models have lifted Tryg's ability to price risks even more accurately. Lastly, within the
'Customer & Commercial Excellence' pillar, we entered several new partnerships in the Swedish motor market to fire up the commercial engine of the Trygg-Hansa brand with the aim of taking a fairer market share of the profitable Swedish market for motor insurance.
Continued price-driven growth to offset inflation
From a macroeconomic perspective, 2025 continued to experience volatility following unpredictable global trade policies. Geopolitical
{4}------------------------------------------------
tensions remained high and continued to affect the financial environment globally. However, the Scandinavian markets saw further positive momentum with a continued easing of the inflationary pressure that has affected the region for some time. Coupled with ongoing price adjustments and other profitability improvement measures, Tryg is particularly pleased to report a significant profitability improvement of 5.5pp in Norway.
Across the Group, revenue grew by 3.8% in 2025 and continued to be mainly driven by price adjustments. Going into 2026, Tryg sees pockets of growth emerging that are expected to gradually bring more balanced growth across new customers, cross- and upselling, and price adjustments.
Maintaining a high level of customer satisfaction
The strong start to the new strategy period was also evident in terms of customer satisfaction, as it rose to 82. This marks an improvement of 1 point since 2024, driven by all countries and most notably Sweden, where we are very pleased to see the significant efforts within Customer & Commercial Excellence bearing fruit. The improvement is a strong step towards the 2027 target of 83. We are particularly proud of this achievement against the backdrop of a prolonged period of necessary pricing initiatives to offset inflationary pressure on claims costs. This achievement was a demonstration of the continuous customer focus of Tryg's employees. Customer satisfaction remains pivotal to Tryg's business model as this ultimately creates strong shareholder value, and we continue to work diligently to meet and exceed customer expectations.
Tryg's climate targets validated by the SBTi
A significant milestone for Tryg's climate efforts was reached in 2025 as Tryg committed to the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) and achieved the SBTi's validation of its climate reduction targets. This underpins Tryg's support for the goal of the Paris Agreement to limit global warming to 1.5°C.
At Tryg, this means that we are working to reduce emissions from our own energy and electricity consumption but, more importantly, that we have set clear targets to address activities where the majority of our total CO2e emissions occur, namely in the value chain through our suppliers and investments. Simultaneously, we are persisting with our longterm strategic focus on reducing the climate impact of the claims handling processes by concentrating on repairs and reuse. In 2025, Tryg reduced CO2e emissions by 9% per average claim - demonstrating good progress on our 2027 target of 6%.
Corporate advocacy on the need for climate adaptation
In Tryg, we see firsthand how our changing climate – most often felt as the impact of more water – is not merely damaging houses and assets, it is destroying the homes and memories of our customers. When asked, approximately three out of four Scandinavians expect weatherrelated damage to be more severe in the future. One in ten has been personally affected by severe wet weather.
To bring relevant perspectives into the public debate in Denmark, Tryg launched a pass-thebaton campaign inviting leading opinion makers to share their views on climate adaption. At the same time, Tryg gathered insights from more than 5,000 customers on their experiences and
concerns related to climate change, which was published in the report 'KlimaTryg Fremtid'. At Tryg we consider it our societal duty to not only handle the claims when damage occurs, but to also proactively help customers – and society – take the right preventive measures to be able to protect ourselves against the weather of the future. But we cannot do it alone. That is why we have argued for the need for a national climate adaptation foundation. One that gathers a range of relevant actors to collectively prioritise, initiate and finance the necessary climate adaptation in Denmark.
We believe it is time for collective effort and collaboration in order for us to address the consequences of climate change.
Increased shareholder remuneration
On 19 June 2025, Tryg concluded the DKK 2bn share buyback programme that was announced on 4 December 2024 at the Capital Markets Day. Additionally, with this report Tryg announces a further share buyback programme of DKK 1bn to be concluded no later than 13 May 2026. Throughout 2025, Tryg has paid a stable quarterly dividend of DKK 2.05, amounting to DKK 8.2 per share for the full year, corresponding to a total dividend of DKK 5,024m and a dividend payout ratio of 82% measured on operating earnings. A stable and increasing dividend payment remains a cornerstone of Tryg's shareholder remuneration commitment.
Thank you to all employees
As is evident from the strong progress made in this first year of the United Towards '27 strategy, 2025 has been a busy year for all Tryg employees. On behalf of The Supervisory Board and the Executive Board, we would like to extend a sincere thank you to all employees for the remarkable efforts that have made this
progress possible. Likewise, we would like to thank our customers for their loyalty and for taking part in our journey.
JUKKA PERTOLA
Chair
JOHAN KIRSTEIN BRAMMER
Group CEO
{5}------------------------------------------------
Tryg at a glance
Leading market position Around 6 million customers
Tryg is the leading non-life insurer in Scandinavia. We are the largest player in Denmark, the third-largest in Sweden and fourth-largest in Norway.
Our 6,700 employees provide peace of mind for around 6 million customers and handle approximately 2 million claims on a yearly basis.
Sustainability a strategic enabler
Sustainability and ESG is an enabler across Tryg's strategic pillars. Our efforts are centred around three focus areas: Future-fit products, Climate action and Empowering people.
Climate adaptation
Tryg works to help its customers protect their homes from climate-related damage through tailored products, prevention efforts and public advocacy.
Attractive dividend policy
Tryg aims to distribute a stable, nominal increase in dividends and to pay out 60-90% of operating earnings.

TryghedsGruppen
TryghedsGruppen owns 49.4%* of Tryg and contributes to projects that create peace of mind via TrygFonden. In 2025, Tryg-Fonden has contributed approximately DKK 700m to these projects. TryghedsGruppen has paid a member bonus of DKK 1bn to Danish customers in Tryg.


Read more about our history at tryg.com
{6}------------------------------------------------
Events in 2025
Group

Implementing Puzzel to shape the future of customer experience
Tryg is adopting Puzzel as its new Customer Experience (CX) platform across Denmark, Norway and Sweden. This marks an important step towards strengthening the company's future customer experience.
Tryg gains a competitive and future-ready CX solution that unifies all customer interactions across voice, chat, messaging and digital channels in one cloud-based platform. Puzzel's AI-driven capabilities, including intelligent virtual agents, omnichannel routing and real-time agent support, will enable employees in the sales and service organisations to deliver improved customer experiences through faster, more targeted and more personalised guidance.
Collaboration with Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) to scale our IT setup
Tryg announced an expansion of our partnership with one of the world's leading IT and technology companies, TCS. The partnership is driven by an ambition to take a technological leap that will strengthen Tryg's ability to deliver the strongest customer experiences in the market through digital services and technology.
A simpler, more efficient IT landscape across Scandinavia ensures the ability to better leverage our scale to benefit our customers and strengthen customer journeys through the development of customer-centric systems.
Tryg's climate targets validated by the Science Based Targets Initiative (SBTi)
Tryg has reached an important milestone in its sustainability work and one of the objectives of the 2027 strategy: Our climate targets have been officially validated by the SBTi. This means that our climate targets are now externally validated to meet the global standard for science-based carbon reductions.
To meet our targets, we will continue our efforts to reduce CO₂e emissions across our own activities and work closely with our suppliers and asset managers to address emissions across our value chain.
Tryg maintains its focus on DEI
For the fourth consecutive year, Tryg marked International Pride Month across Scandinavia in June and participated in the Pride parade in Copenhagen and Bergen. Tryg was the first company in Denmark to be awarded a rainbow certificate and recognised for its
efforts to create equal opportunities and an inclusive working environment regardless of gender or sexual orientation.
Recognised for sustainability performance
Tryg was recognised in Denmark, Norway and Sweden as being among the best performers across the sector for our sustainability performance. Specifically in Norway and Sweden, Tryg and Trygg-Hansa were awarded the top ranking among insurance companies. The sustainability assessment considers insurers' performance across claims handling, prevention, procurement, investments and partnerships.
Denmark

New AI model streamlines car damage case processing
Tryg has implemented a new AI model to handle car damage cases involving collisions between two vehicles. The solution significantly enhances the customer experience by enabling much faster
decisions: in 85 percent of cases, questions of fault that previously took days or even weeks can now be resolved within minutes or hours.
Customer satisfaction in these types of cases is expected to increase by up to 30% due to the shorter waiting times. The AI model has been trained in 42,000 cases and is continuously monitored by our experts to ensure optimal efficiency and high-quality decisions.
The use of AI is a key element of Tryg's 2027 strategy, and this model is expected to be expanded to other areas to further strengthen the customer experience.
Commercial achieves strong position in the dental patient insurance market
Since 1 January 2025, it has been mandatory for private dentists to have patient insurance covering injury to patients during treatment. Commercial DK was first to market with a new insurance product and has successfully positioned Tryg as the market leader with a market share of over 50 percent.
High demand for Tryg's pregnancy insurance
Three years ago, Tryg launched a pregnancy insurance that supports both mother and child during pregnancy and immediately after birth. The launch was inspired by our Swedish operations where pregnancy insurance has been a high-demand product for decades.
{7}------------------------------------------------
Events in 2025
The insurance has quickly become a soughtafter part of the pregnancy journey for a growing number of Danes. In 2024, just under one in ten pregnant women in Denmark was insured with Tryg. After only one year, that figure has risen to nearly one in five (18 percent).
Norway

The Bergen Climate Festival 2025
Tryg reinforced its role as a responsible corporate citizen during the Bergen Climate Festival in spring 2025 by hosting the debate "Who Pays the Bill for Climate Change?".
The event brought together leading politicians, researchers and representatives from public administration and the private sector to discuss financing mechanisms for climate adaptation and the management of growing climate risks in Norway. The initiative strengthened Tryg's profile as a driving force for climate adaptation and sustainable societal preparedness.
Strategic partnerships with real estate agencies
In 2025, Tryg entered strategic partnerships with the real estate chains Privatmegleren and Sem & Johnsen for the distribution of home buyer insurance. At the same time, the collaboration with OBOS Eiendomsmeglere was strengthened, as the company became a direct partner in the same product area from 1 July. These agreements represent an important step in the development of the property-related insurance market and put Tryg in a stronger position in a growing segment.
Profitability improvements at Tryg Norway
Throughout the year, Tryg Norway has implemented a series of measures that collectively have delivered a clear strengthening of profitability. The combined ratio has improved, revenue is increasing and cost discipline has been tightened further.
A significant part of the improvement stems from targeted and differentiated price measures, higher deductibles and adjustments to product terms combined with more data-driven and precise risk-based pricing including the discontinuation of partner agreements that no longer met profitability requirements. Enhanced use of external data and in-house models has improved accuracy, particularly within water and motor claims.
Operational efficiency has also contributed materially. The cost base has been reduced over time, supported by increased
digitalisation, automation and the use of AI tools. Together, these initiatives have delivered a marked and sustainable improvement in profitability for Tryg Norway.
Sweden

New strategic partnership with the Swedish Hockey League
After 18 years, Trygg-Hansa rejoined the Swedish Hockey League (SHL) as official partner, entering a new chapter of creating safety both on and off the ice. Trygg-Hansa's well-known lifebuoy is once again visible on the SHL's referee shirts, and Trygg-Hansa also offers a targeted supporter discount on several insurance products to the clubs' supporters.
New partnerships in motor insurance
During the year, Trygg-Hansa entered new collaborations in motor insurance with Subaru, Carla and Veho Import and also expanded its collaboration with Hedin Automotive. The ambition with all the
partnerships is to reach more potential customers in order to grow in both the private and commercial markets.
Home insurance upgrade
Trygg-Hansa launched a redesign of its home insurance in the autumn of 2025, the most comprehensive update in several years. Among the new features are protection against online fraud, ID theft and online harassment, as well as improved compensation for consumer electronics. The service "The House Help" was also launched to help homeowners identify risks in their properties in order to prevent future claims. One of the upgraded products, 'Villaförsäkring stor', is now ranked as the no. 1 house insurance on the market according to The Swedish Consumers' Insurance Bureau rankings.
{8}------------------------------------------------
Non-financial
highlights 2025
Customer satisfaction score
Highlights 2025
Financial highlights 2025
Revenue growth (in local currencies)
3.8% 0.3pp 13.4%
Group underlying claims ratio improvement
2024: 4.1% 2024: 0.3pp (improvement)
Expense ratio
2024: 13.5%
80.3% 7,945m 778m
Combined Ratio Insurance service result (DKK)
2024: 81.7% 2024: 7,056m 2024: 911m
Net investment result (DKK)
53%
2027 target: 83
82
Use of straight-through processing for digitally reported claims
2027 target: > 55%
7,212m 8.20 196%
Profit before tax (DKK)
2024: 6,303m 2024: 7.80 2024: 196%
Dividend per share (DKK)
Solvency ratio
9%
CO2e reduction per claim, on average
2027 target: 6% reduction per claim, on average, compared to 2024

{9}------------------------------------------------
Financial highlights Q4 2025
Financial highlights Q4 2025
Revenue growth (in local currencies)
4.1% 0.3pp 13.6%
Group underlying claims ratio improvement
Q4 2024: 3.6% Q4 2024: 0.3pp (improvement)
Expense ratio
Q4 2024: 13.3%
Profit/loss before tax
(DKK)
81.4% 1,918m 171m
Combined Ratio Insurance service result (DKK)
Net investment result (DKK)
Q4 2024: 82.5% Q4 2024: 1,708m Q4 2024: -265m
Dividend per share (DKK)
Q4 2024: 1,033m Q4 2024: 1.95 Q3 2025: 204%
1,707m 2.05 196%
Solvency ratio
Accounting policy change
In March 2025, Tryg published a newsletter on an improvement in the hedging strategy for inflation risk related to long-tailed lines of business. Comparison figures have been restated. The impact was mainly on Q2 and Q3 2024, while the impact on Q1 2024 was minor. No impact was recorded in Q4 2024.
A comparison of reported and restated figures is shown below.
The restatement simply moves income between the insurance service result and the investment result, and hence profit/loss before tax is unaffected. For more details on the inflation hedge, see note 1 on general accounting policies and the [IR newsletter](https://www.tryg.com/sites/tryg.com/files/2025-03/Hedging inflation Newsletter March 2025.pdf).
Quarterly results
| Q4 2025 | Q4 2024 | Q4 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| DKKm | reported | restated | |
| Insurance service result | 1,918 | 1,708 | 1,708 |
| Net investment result | 171 | -265 | -265 |
| Other income and costs | -382 | -409 | -409 |
| Profit/loss before tax | 1,707 | 1,033 | 1,033 |
Annual results
| 2025 | 2024 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| DKKm | reported | restated | |
| Insurance service result | 7,945 | 7,324 | 7,056 |
| Net investment result | 778 | 643 | 911 |
| Other income and costs | -1,511 | -1,664 | -1,664 |
| Profit/loss before tax | 7,212 | 6,303 | 6,303 |
{10}------------------------------------------------

{11}------------------------------------------------
United Towards '27
Tryg hosted a Capital Markets Day on 4 December 2024, unveiling its 2027 financial and strategic targets.
Tryg hosted a Capital Markets Day in December 2024, during which its strategy and financial targets for 2027 were unveiled under the theme 'Leveraging Scale to Drive Technical and Commercial Excellence'.
Financial targets
Tryg targets a combined ratio of around 81% and an insurance service result between DKK 8.0-8.4bn supported by a return on own funds (ROOF) of between 35% and 40%. These targets are the most ambitious in Tryg's history, leveraging the scale of the expanded Group following the acquisition of RSA's Swedish and Norwegian businesses, which virtually doubled Tryg's insurance service result.
Tryg also communicated an ambition for shareholder remuneration of DKK 17-18bn, comprising an ordinary dividend of DKK 15-16bn for the period 2025-2027 and the DKK 2bn extraordinary share buyback launched in December 2024. This ambition underscores Tryg's ongoing commitment to shareholder remuneration grounded in a robust and stable insurance business.
Strategic targets
Tryg identified three strategic targets in this new strategy period.
Customer satisfaction
The first strategic target is centred around improving customer satisfaction. Tryg believes that high customer satisfaction and retention rates contribute to lower distribution costs. Therefore, achieving the customer satisfaction target is crucial for realising the financial objectives. For the new strategy period, Tryg has set a customer satisfaction score target of 83 by 2027. Tryg has rebased the customer satisfaction baseline from 87 to 81 for the new period. This difference arises from an updated scoring methodology and the inclusion of the entire Swedish business, which was not part of the customer satisfaction targets for 2024. Tryg is therefore targeting a score of 83, an improvement of 2 points against the old target.
Straight-through processing
The second strategic target focuses on increasing straight-through processing (STP). Tryg is strongly focused on fast and efficient claims handling, aiming to increase straightthrough processing for digitally reported claims to over 55%, an improvement of 10 percentage points from the baseline of 45%. Tryg defines STP as a claims handling process that does not involve any manual touchpoint, thus only relying on automated processes. Tryg believes that a higher degree of automation results in increased customer satisfaction and improved cost efficiency, thus contributing to the realisation of the financial objectives.
Financial and strategic KPIs 2027




Strengthen market-leading profitability1)
Generate resilient growth in insurance service result1)
Deliver best in class Return On Own Funds
Keep strong shareholders' remuneration focus intact
~81% Combined ratio DKK 8.0-8.4bn 35-40% DKK 17-18bn,
incl. DKK 15-16bn ordinary dividend during 2025-2027 and the DKK 2bn extraordinary share buyback (Dec. 24)
1) As always, assuming interest rates and currency levels are as at 4 December 2024 (CMD date) and guided large/weather claims
Financial KPIs

Continue improving customer satisfaction
83 (+2points)

Increase straight-through processing for digitally reported claims
sustainability
>55% (+10pp)
6% per claim, on average
Reduce CO2e emissions, continuing focus on
Strategic KPIs
{12}------------------------------------------------
The final strategic target aims to reduce the climate impact from Tryg's claims handling – one of the most CO2e intensive processes across Tryg's value chain activities. Tryg's target of reducing CO2e emissions by 6% on average per claim by 20271 builds on a long-term and continued focus on repairs and reused materials in the claims handling process.
The target forms part of Tryg's strategic sustainability targets, covering the three focus areas: Future-fit products, Climate action and Empowering people. Central to the strategic focus areas is a concentration on climate adaptation and customer resilience, sciencebased emissions targets, and reducing climate and environmental impact from claims handling – supported by a strong commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion.
Read more about the sustainability strategy in the Sustainability Statement.
Strategic pillars supporting the targets
To achieve the financial and strategic targets, Tryg has identified three strategic pillars and four enablers to support the strategy towards 2027.
The three strategic pillars, Scale & Simplicity, Technical Excellence, and Customer & Commercial Excellence, focus on leveraging Tryg's size and scaling best practices across the Group. These pillars aim to increase the insurance service result by DKK 1bn by 2027.
Scale & Simplicity
The first strategic pillar is focused around utilising our size to become an even stronger and more efficient company. There are three main contributors. The first one is to leverage the increased size from the RSA Scandinavia
transaction to combine IT systems. The second one aims to deliver economies of scale in claims through the digitalisation of claims handling, optimised procurement and increased fraud prevention. The third focus area aims to streamline the back-end tasks through automation. In total, the target is to deliver a DKK 500m improvement in the insurance service result by 2027.
Technical Excellence
The second strategic pillar focuses on strengthening Tryg's technical insurance disciplines. The aim is to scale world-class portfolio management competences in Sweden to the rest of Tryg, to use more advanced pricing to improve our risk selection and risk-correct pricing, and to further leverage scale and standardisation in underwriting to increase profitability and manage volatility. The target is to deliver a DKK 300m insurance service result impact by 2027.
Customer & Commercial Excellence
The third strategic pillar is anchored in our customers and focuses on ensuring commercial excellence across Tryg's business. We plan to copy commercial successes across markets, e.g. by copying personal accident and online sales from Sweden to Denmark and Norway, and scaling best practices in motor, partnership and customer satisfaction from Denmark and Norway to Sweden. These initiatives target delivering DKK 200m to the insurance service result by 2027 and also expanding Tryg's position in each market to ensure a strong longterm business.
Enablers
The strategy is supported by four enablers: customer experience, sustainability & ESG, data & technology and people & culture. These will ensure we deliver holistically across the Group.
Strategic pillars 2027

Scale & Simplicity
DKK 500m increase in ISR

Leverage increased size to combine IT systems, simplify processes and deliver economies of scale

Technical Excellence
DKK 300m increase in ISR

Scale world-class portfolio management and advanced pricing and underwriting with new data and technology

Customer & Commercial Excellence
DKK 200m increase in ISR

Scale proven commercial successes across the Group and further strengthen focus on customer satisfaction
Customer experience
Sustainability & ESG
Data & technology
People and culture
{13}------------------------------------------------
Progress towards 2027 ambitions
Status update on 2027 targets
In December 2024, Tryg hosted a Capital Markets Day where the 2027 strategy and targets were published. The strategy period has concluded its first year, and Tryg is pleased to report a strong start and solid progress towards reaching the 2027 ambitions for both the financial and strategic targets.
Financial targets
Tryg has set ambitious financial targets for the strategy period. The main financial targets are a combined ratio of around 81%, an insurance service result between DKK 8.0-8.4bn, return on own funds of 35-40%, and shareholders' remuneration of DKK 17-18bn1. For 2025, Tryg reports positive progress on the financial targets with a combined ratio of 80.3%, an insurance service result of DKK 7.9bn, and a return on own funds of 40.3% for the year. The underlying claims ratio improved in 2025 mainly driven by price initiatives, active portfolio management and targeted underwriting leveraging new tools as part of the strategic pillar Technical Excellence. Additionally, results were supported by lower-than-normal levels of large and weather claims. Shareholders' remuneration during the strategy period reached DKK 8bn by the end of 2025, comprising the ordinary dividend and the extraordinary share buyback of DKK 2bn launched at the CMD 2024 as well as a new extraordinary share buyback of DKK 1bn in addition to the CMD target.
Strategic targets
Tryg has set three strategic targets for 2027 as highlighted below.
The first target is customer satisfaction, and Tryg is pleased to report a customer satisfaction level of 82 at the end of 2025 mainly driven by an improvement in key processes relating to the customer journey. Maintaining strong momentum towards this target is critical for achieving the 2027 financial goals, as higher customer satisfaction and retention are strongly correlated with lower distribution costs, which remains a key competitive parameter for Tryg. To further enhance customer satisfaction, Tryg expanded its cooperation with TCS in autumn 2025 under the strategic pillar Scale and Simplicity. TCS assumed ownership of a range of older IT systems, allowing Tryg to focus on developing customer-centric systems and processes that improve the customer journey.
Secondly, Tryg has a target for STP on digitally reported claims. STP is an important tool for executing claims handling more swiftly and thereby improving cost efficiency and increasing customer satisfaction. For 2025, Tryg reported a STP level of 53%, which signals that Tryg is well under way with reaching its 2027 ambitions. The increase in the STP ratio was impacted by various initiatives within motor, home and bike.
Lastly, Tryg set a target of reducing CO2e emissions by 6% on average per claim by 2027 (compared to 2024) as part of the Group's sustainability agenda. Tryg is pleased to report
Status on financial and strategic targets
| Key PerformanceIndicators | Targets2027 | Status 2025 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Combined ratio | ~81% | 80.3% | ||
| Insurance service result | DKK 8.0-8.4bn | DKK 7,945m | ||
| Financial | Return on own funds(ROOF) | 35-40% | 40.3% | |
| Shareholders' remuneration(during 2025-2027)1 | DKK 17-18bn | DKK 8bn | ||
| Customersatisfaction | 83 | 82 | ||
| Straight-through processing(STP) | >55% | 53% | ||
| Strategic | Reduce CO2e emissions perclaim, on average | 6% | 9% | |


1 Including DKK 15-16bn ordinary dividend range during 2025-2027 and the DKK 2bn extraordinary share buyback announced at CMD 2024
{14}------------------------------------------------
solid progress and a CO2e emissions reduction of 9% per claim by the end of 2025. Performance is driven by a consistent focus on prioritising repairs and reuse whenever possible, procurement cost savings and the claims mix.
Progress on strategic initiatives
In addition to delivering solid progress on financial and strategic targets, Tryg reports a strong, ahead-of-schedule momentum in implementing several key initiatives across its strategic domains: Scale & Simplicity, Technical Excellence and Customer & Commercial Excellence. These initiatives are designed to bridge the gap between current performance and the Group's 2027 ambitions.
Tryg demonstrates particularly strong progress on strategic initiatives in the pillars Scale & Simplicity and Customer & Commercial Excellence. So far, progress within Technical Excellence has been less pronounced, with further efforts to be initiated in 2026 and 2027 as planned.
Within the Scale & Simplicity pillar, the expansion of Tryg's strategic partnership with TCS in September 2025 marked a significant milestone. This expanded collaboration enables Tryg to re-orchestrate the company's agile development processes in a unified and efficient way across countries and business units, creating a clear path for leveraging scale and establishing the foundation for next generation customer experiences. Additionally, Tryg is advancing the harmonisation of claims handling systems across its geographies. The final step in this process is the implementation of Guidewire in Trygg-Hansa, which was initiated in 2024, and the first product went live in Q4 2025. The rollout will build on experience from successful implementations in Denmark and Norway.
Progress on implementation of strategic initiatives



Scale world-class claims handling Enhance advanced pricing





Automate back-end operations Optimise individual underwriting process

Scale & Simplicity Technical Excellence Customer & Commercial Excellence

Simplify IT foundation Improve portfolio management Grow Personal Accident portfolio

Improve online offering to strengthen position in small commercial customers

Grow profitable motor portfolio in Sweden

Focus on strategic partnerships in Sweden

Increase customer satisfaction to drive further cross-sales and retention

Needs attention On track Ahead of plan


Under the strategic pillar Customer & Commercial Excellence, several initiatives have been launched to strengthen commercial momentum, particularly in Sweden but also in Denmark and Norway. In Sweden, Trygg-Hansa has entered multiple strategic partnerships aimed at accelerating growth in the motor portfolio, leveraging experience from Denmark and Norway. These partnerships are showing solid progress and are expected to contribute more than SEK 130m in annual sales. Furthermore, Tryg is seeing strong traction on pregnancy insurance in Denmark and Norway
following the product's expansion from Sweden. In both markets, approximately 20% of all pregnant women now choose Tryg's offering.
As part of the strategic pillar Technical Excellence, Tryg has initiated several initiatives to improve profitability and enhance risk selection. A key initiative is the introduction of a new UW tool designed to improve underwriting quality and pricing accuracy. Built on a userfriendly, AI-ready technical platform, the tool leverages data-driven insights to support underwriting decisions. Adaptation is
accelerating across the Group and, in Norway, where the tool is fully adopted, a significant contribution to the portfolio's profitability improvement was evident in 2025.
Overall, Tryg has demonstrated clear progress towards its financial and strategic targets during the first year of the strategy period. This constitutes a solid basis for the coming two years and confirms that Tryg is on track to achieve the company's 2027 ambitions.
{15}------------------------------------------------

{16}------------------------------------------------

Income overview
| Q4 | Q4 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
| NOK/DKK, average exchange rate for the period | 63.75 | 63.24 | 63.74 | 64.30 | 65.37 |
| SEK/DKK, average exchange rate for the period | 67.99 | 64.96 | 67.28 | 65.33 | 64.88 |
| Insurance revenue | 10,293 | 9,734 | 40,356 | 38,596 | 37,135 |
| Gross claims | -7,038 | -6,466 | -26,210 | -25,596 | -25,204 |
| Insurance operating costs | -1,404 | -1,299 | -5,425 | -5,196 | -4,959 |
| Insurance service expenses | -8,442 | -7,766 | -31,636 | -30,792 | -30,163 |
| Profit/loss on gross business | 1,851 | 1,969 | 8,720 | 7,804 | 6,972 |
| Net expense from reinsurance contracts | 67 | -261 | -775 | -748 | -507 |
| Insurance service result | 1,918 | 1,708 | 7,945 | 7,056 | 6,465 |
| Net investment result | 171 | -265 | 778 | 911 | 565 |
| Other income and costs | -382 | -409 | -1,511 | -1,664 | -2,001 |
| Profit/loss before tax | 1,707 | 1,033 | 7,212 | 6,303 | 5,029 |
| Tax | -429 | -247 | -1,807 | -1,488 | -1,178 |
| Profit/loss for the period | 1,277 | 786 | 5,405 | 4,816 | 3,851 |
| Run-off gains/losses, net of reinsurance | 217 | 233 | 895 | 832 | 1,166 |
| Key figures and ratios | |||||
| Total equity | 39,620 | 38,864 | 39,620 | 38,864 | 40,351 |
| Return on equity after tax (%) | 12.7 | 7.6 | 13.7 | 12.2 | 9.4 |
| Return on Own Funds (%) | 36.8 | 21.9 | 40.3 | 34.1 | 24.8 |
| Return on Tangible Equity (%) | 53.4 | 30.4 | 54.3 | 47.2 | 34.3 |
| Number of shares (1,000) | 602,020 | 613,165 | 602,020 | 613,165 | 617,455 |
| Earnings per share (DKK) | 2.09 | 1.25 | 8.83 | 7.71 | 6.08 |
| Operating earnings per share (DKK) | 2.38 | 1.54 | 10.00 | 8.90 | 7.26 |
| Ordinary dividend per share (DKK) | 2.05 | 1.95 | 8.20 | 7.80 | 7.40 |
| Net asset value per share (DKK) | 65.81 | 63.38 | 65.81 | 63.38 | 65.35 |
| Revenue growth in local currencies (%) | 4.1 | 3.6 | 3.8 | 4.1 | 4.8 |
| Gross claims ratio | 68.4 | 66.4 | 64.9 | 66.3 | 67.9 |
| Net reinsurance ratio | -0.7 | 2.7 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1.4 |
| Claims ratio, net of reinsurance | 67.7 | 69.1 | 66.9 | 68.3 | 69.2 |
| Expense ratio | 13.6 | 13.3 | 13.4 | 13.5 | 13.4 |
| Combined ratio | 81.4 | 82.5 | 80.3 | 81.7 | 82.6 |
| Run-off, net of reinsurance (%) | -2.1 | -2.4 | -2.2 | -2.2 | -3.1 |
| Large claims, net of reinsurance (%) | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 2.7 |
| Weather claims, net of reinsurance (%) | 1.7 | 2.8 | 1.5 | 2.4 | 3.4 |
| Discounting (%) | -2.4 | -2.1 | -2.4 | -2.3 | -3.0 |
| Combined ratio by business area | |||||
| Private | 82.0 | 83.5 | 82.1 | 83.7 | 84.3 |
| Commercial | 80.1 | 80.3 | 76.5 | 77.5 | 79.4 |
Note: Tryg has changed the presentation of externally given inflation assumptions measured as part of the insurance liabilities. Comparative figures have been restated accordingly. Note: ESRS disclosure points incorporated by reference in this section (ESRS ID): SBM-1_06.
{17}------------------------------------------------
Financial outlook
Insurance revenue growth will primarily come from the retail segment, while the profitability outlook is supported by a normalised inflation level and the effects of pricing initiatives. Tryg targets an insurance service result of DKK 8.0-8.4bn in 2027 driven by a combined ratio of around 81%. Return on own funds is targeted at between 35% and 40% in 2027.
The Scandinavian non-life insurance markets remain generally stable, as consumers cover their insurance needs well and customer satisfaction is high. Growth in the industry has been accelerating in recent years driven by price adjustments to match inflationary pressure. Historical long-term growth in the Private and Commercial segments has been hovering around low-to-mid single digit.
Capital markets day in London
Tryg hosted a Capital Markets Day in London in December 2024 and presented its 2027 financial and strategic targets. Tryg is targeting an insurance service result in the range of DKK 8.0-8.4bn in 2027 driven by a combined ratio of around 81%. Tryg is also targeting a return on own funds (ROOF) of between 35% and 40%. As always, the financial targets assume unchanged levels of interest rates and currency exchange rates, as well as the guided level of large and weather claims, both at DKK 800m per annum, during the strategy period. The insurance service result is anticipated to grow by DKK 1bn from the normalised 2024 level to 2027 with three pillars being the key drivers: Scale & Simplicity (DKK 500m), Technical Excellence
(DKK 300m) and Customer & Commercial Excellence (DKK 200m). The most important initiatives are detailed in the CMD presentation.
Follow-up on 2025 results
2025 was a year of solid delivery for Tryg. Insurance revenue grew 3.8% measured in local currencies. The insurance service result was reported at DKK 7.9bn, in part driven by a more favourable-than-normal large and weather claims outcome, while run-off was in line with guidance. Normalising large and weather claims, the insurance service result amounted to just above DKK 7.5bn in 2025, in line with the expectation of a gradual increase throughout the current strategy period. The net investment result was impacted by positive developments in the financial markets and amounted to DKK 778m, well above normalised expectations. Other income and costs amounted to DKK 1.5bn, marginally higher than guided levels driven by the strong appreciation of the SEK. Return on own funds was 40.3%, a strong delivery on the 35-40% target for 2027.
2026 outlook
Tryg's revenue growth in 2026 is expected to
come primarily from the retail portfolios (private & commercial), while growth in the upper part of the Commercial segment (the former Corporate segment) is likely to be more limited. In the past few years, insurance revenue growth has mainly been driven by price adjustments to offset inflationary pressure. Importantly, wage inflation is the leading indicator to monitor, and Tryg continues to see this around 3.5% in 2026.
Longer term, Tryg anticipates growth gradually becoming more balanced through a focus on cross-selling and up-selling to existing customers as well as attracting new customers through commercial activities.
As mentioned, Tryg reported an insurance service result - adjusted for the more favourable-than-normal large and weather claims outcome - of just above DKK 7.5bn in 2025 and is targeting its highest ever insurance service result of DKK 8.0-8.4bn in 2027. The insurance service result is expected to increase gradually on a normalised basis throughout the remainder of the strategy period.
High retention levels in Scandinavia coupled with dedicated cost management have historically enabled Tryg to maintain stable and low expense ratios. This cost focus will continue, with reinvestments strategically directed to shape the business for the future. As a well-diversified insurer with three large businesses in Scandinavia, Tryg expects a runoff level of approximately 2%. Tryg remains confident in the strength of its reserve position and will continue its prudent reserving practices. Tryg's insurance business is generally stable but can be subject to volatility due to weather events and large claims. These factors must be monitored over extended periods, as their impact can vary annually, as evidenced by historical data on large and weather-related claims. Tryg is protected by a well structured reinsurance programme to mitigate this volatility, though some fluctuations are inevitable. Large claims are anticipated to be evenly distributed across the quarters, at an expected annual level of DKK 800m. Historical data suggests that weather claims will amount to approximately DKK 800m annually with seasonal variations: 40% of these are expected in Q1, 10% in Q2, 20% in Q3, and 30% in Q4.
The general interest rate environment affects the discounting of Tryg's claims reserves. A 100 basis points drop in interest rates leads to a 100 basis points deterioration in the combined ratio, all else being equal, as Tryg would discount its claims reserves with a lower interest rate level, therefore reporting a higher level of claims costs in its profit/loss. Additionally, while the combined ratio is virtually unaffected by currency fluctuations, significant weakness in either the Norwegian or Swedish currencies against the Danish currency would negatively impact the insurance service result, and vice versa.
For 2026, other income and costs are expected to be between negative DKK 1.4 and DKK 1.5bn. The primary item booked against this line is the intangibles amortisation from the RSA Scandinavia acquisition, which is expected to be around DKK 800m per annum.
{18}------------------------------------------------
Investment activities (DKK 59bn as per end of Q4 2025) are managed taking into consideration the specifics of the non-life insurance business. Invested assets are split into a match portfolio (DKK 45bn at end-Q4 2025) and a free portfolio (DKK 15bn at end-Q4 2025). The match portfolio is primarily made up of Scandinavian covered bonds (rated AAA) matching the insurance liabilities. The objective is for the return on the match portfolio to be as close as possible to zero, as capital gains or losses driven by interest rate movements should result in similar, but opposite, movements on assets and liabilities. The return on premium provisions is also booked as part of the match portfolio and is expected to be around DKK 200m per annum at the current level of interest rates.
Following the de-risking of investments announced at the CMD in December 2024, Tryg expects a more stable return from the free portfolio, which currently comprises only covered and government bonds (84% of the
total free portfolio) with a two-year duration and real estate (16% of the free portfolio). Tryg has additionally disclosed that real estate will not be part of the asset mix in the long term - covered and government bonds will be the only asset class.
The overall full-year tax rate for 2026 is expected to be approximately 24.5%. This reflects Tryg's earnings distribution across Sweden, which has the lowest corporate tax rate at 20.6%, Norway, which has a corporate tax rate of 25%, and Denmark, which has the highest rate at 26%, including the special 'Arne tax' for financial institutions. The investment result may also weigh either positively or negatively on the tax rate.
Tryg will continue to focus on disciplined capital management, and with ambitious profitability targets delivered with a high return on own funds targeted in the range of 35-40%, Tryg continues to aim to offer a nominally stable and
increasing ordinary dividend on an annual basis. The targeted payout ratio of 60-90% (based on operating earnings) is secondary to the aim of increasing the annual dividend.
Financial KPIs 2027
8.0-8.4bn ~81% 35-40% 17-18bn
Insurance service result (DKK)1)
Combined ratio1)
Return on own funds
Ordinary dividends and extraordinary share buyback2)
Strategic KPIs 2027
>55% 83 6%
Straight-through processing
Customer satisfaction
Average CO2e emission reduction per claim
-
As always, assuming interest rates and currency levels are as at 4 December 2024 (CMD date) and guided large/weather claims
-
Including DKK 15-16bn ordinary dividend range during 2025-2027 and the DKK 2bn extraordinary share buyback announced at CMD 2024
{19}------------------------------------------------
Tryg's results
Tryg reported an insurance service result of DKK 7,945m (DKK 7,056m) in 2025. Insurance revenue growth measured in local currencies was 3.8% mainly driven by price initiatives to mitigate claims inflation. The underlying claims ratio for the Group improved by 30 basis points in 2025, while the underlying claims ratio for the Private segment improved by 20 basis points. The strong result was supported by weather and large claims combined being DKK 442m below normalised levels of DKK 800m each. The investment result was DKK 778m (DKK 911m). Profit/loss before tax was DKK 7,212m (DKK 6,303m). Tryg is paying a dividend for the full year of DKK 8.20 per share and has in addition announced a share buyback programme of DKK 1bn on the disclosure date of the Annual Report 2025, after which the solvency ratio is 196%1.
Results 2025
Tryg reported an insurance service result of DKK 7,945m (DKK 7,056m) for 2025 driven by a strong combined ratio of 80.3% (81.7%). Comparative figures for 2024 were restated following the updated hedging strategy as disclosed in the IR Newsletter of March 2025 (primarily impacting Q2 and Q3 2025). This applies to both Group and Business area figures and impacts the consolidated insurance service result and the investment return.
The insurance service result was positively impacted by revenue growth measured in local currencies of 3.8% (4.1%) primarily driven by the Private segment and in line with expectations. The result included large claims of DKK 570m and weather claims of DKK 587m, both below the normalised annual level of DKK 800m each. The underlying claims ratio (i.e. the claims ratio adjusted for volatile factors such as large and weather claims, run-off result and interest rate movements) improved by 30 basis points for the Group as a result of profitability
initiatives in both the Private and the Commercial segments. The run-off result was 2.2% (2.2%), in line with guidance of around 2%. The discount rate for claims provisions was 2.4% (2.3%), reflecting a largely unchanged interest rate environment.
A customer satisfaction score of 82 was achieved as at end-2025, showcasing a strong start to the current strategy period towards 2027. The improvement stems from both online channels and direct interactions with clients across the Group and especially in Sweden. Tryg continues to have a strong focus on customer satisfaction as this is essential for share of wallet expansion and commercial traction in the market, but also for maintaining high retention rates, supporting low distribution costs and thereby achieving a low expense ratio.
The year 2025 was characterised by continued macroeconomic uncertainty, but Tryg's very low-risk investment portfolio means it is less exposed to asset price volatility. Total investment return was DKK 778m (DKK 911m
restated for the change in accounting practice related to the inflation hedge) and above expectations after de-risking the portfolio towards the end of 2024.
Insurance revenue
Insurance revenue amounted to DKK 40,356m (DKK 38,596m), corresponding to growth of 3.8% in local currencies. Growth was primarily driven by the Private segment growing 4.7% (6.9%) as a result of continued price adjustments to mitigate inflation and improve profitability, particularly in Private Norway. In the Commercial segment (including both commercial and corporate customers), growth was 2.0% (-1.3%) measured in local currencies. The Commercial segment grew primarily through price initiatives, and Tryg's main focus remained profitable growth. Across the Group, several initiatives were implemented to improve the commercial momentum, especially in Sweden, including new and expanded distribution partnerships.
Financial highlights 2025
7,945m
Insurance service result (DKK)
2024: 7,056m
7,212m
Profit/loss before tax
2024: 6,303m
66.9%
Claims ratio, net of reinsurance
2024: 68.3%
13.4%
Gross expense ratio
2024: 13.5%
80.3%
Combined ratio
2024: 81.7%
1 The solvency ratio at the end of 2025 was positively impacted by a temporary refinancing effect of 3pp related to the issuance of new restricted Tier 1 capital in November 2025 and subsequent call of the existing instrument in January 2026.
{20}------------------------------------------------
Claims
The claims ratio, net of reinsurance, was 66.9% (68.3%) for the year, showcasing a sound overall profitability improvement. The underlying claims ratio for the Group improved by 30 basis points driven by profitability initiatives in both the Private and the Commercial segments. In the Private segment, the underlying claims ratio improved by 20 basis points on average during the year with an improving trend through the quarters, primarily driven by profitability measures implemented in Norway. This is a testament to the strong focus on the underlying claims ratio and is fully in line with expectations.
Weather claims for the year amounted to DKK 587m (DKK 933m), well below the guided level of DKK 800m for the year. Large claims were benign and amounted to DKK 570m (DKK 555m), also well below the guided level of DKK 800m. In total, weather and large claims were DKK 442m below guidance and DKK 330m below the level in 2024, adding tailwinds to the results when comparing to 2024.
The run-off result was in line with expectations at 2.2% (2.2%) and in line with Tryg's overall guidance of approximately 2%.
The discounting impact was broadly unchanged from 2024 to 2025, resulting in a discount rate of 2.4% (2.3%). The overall interest level impacts the discounting benefit. A higher discount rate of the liabilities implies a lower amount of claims cost being reported (all else being equal), which impacts the result positively.
Expenses
The expense ratio was reported at 13.4% (13.5%). Tryg remains focused on having tight cost controls and sees this as a key competitive advantage. The expense ratio is expected to be stable to slightly improving towards 2027 as
disclosed at the Capital Markets Day in December 2024.
Investment activities
The investment result for the year totalled DKK 778m (DKK 911m). The year was characterised by positive developments in the financial markets although volatility remained present. Tryg is among the European insurers least exposed to asset risk due to its very conservative asset allocation. The free portfolio reported a result of DKK 320m (DKK 672m, the match portfolio reported a DKK 724m (DKK 536m) result, while other financial income and expenses totalled DKK -267m (DKK -297m). In December 2024, Tryg disclosed that it had changed the asset mix in the free portfolio and sold more than DKK 7bn of risky assets, such as equities, corporate bonds and alternative assets, and replaced these with short-duration, liquid Scandinavian covered bonds. At its capital markets day in December 2024, Tryg announced that real estate would no longer be a part of its asset allocation in the long term. During 2025, the company sold more than DKK 900m of real estate assets, reducing exposure to DKK 2.3bn from DKK 3.3bn in Q4 2024. The divested real estate assets were replaced by covered and government bonds.
Other income and costs
Other income and costs amounted to DKK 1,511m (DKK 1,664m). The largest costs in this line were the amortisation of customer relations, e.g. related to the Alka and RSA Scandinavia transactions, which totalled around DKK 900m in 2025. In addition, this line includes other non-insurance costs.
Profit/loss before and after tax
Profit/loss before tax was DKK 7,212m (DKK 6,303m), while profit/loss after tax was DKK 5,405m (DKK 4,816m), implying an overall tax expense of DKK 1,807m (DKK 1,488m), corresponding to an effective tax rate of 25.0% (23.6%), broadly in line with Tryg's guidance and driven by the improved profitability in Norway.
Dividend and solvency
Tryg's own funds amounted to DKK 13,570m, while the solvency capital requirement (SCR) was DKK 6,916m at the end 2025, resulting in a solvency ratio of 196%. The solvency position was positively impacted by a temporary refinancing effect of 3pp related to the issuance of new restricted Tier 1 capital in November 2025 and the subsequent call of the existing Tier 1 capital instrument in January 2026. Tryg will be paying a full-year dividend for 2025 of DKK 8.20 per share. Additionally, on the date of disclosure of the 2025 Annual Report, Tryg has announced a share buyback programme of DKK 1bn. Return on own funds (ROOF) is 40.3%, a strong delivery on the targeted level of 35-40% in 2027.
Results Q4 2025
In Q4 2025, Tryg reported an insurance service result of DKK 1,918m (DKK 1,708m) and a combined ratio of 81.4% (82.5%). Revenue growth measured in local currencies was 4.1% (3.6%) with the Private segment contributing the most and in line with expectations. The underlying claims ratio (i.e. the claims ratio adjusted for volatile factors such as large and weather claims, run-off result and interest rate movements) improved by 30 basis points as a result of profitability initiatives in both the Private and the Commercial segments. The underlying claims ratio for the Private segment also improved by 30 basis points in the quarter.
The result included benign large claim experience of DKK 150m compared to the normalised level of DKK 200m, while weather claims at DKK 174m were well below the normalised level of DKK 240m.The run-off result was 2.1% (2.4%) and in line with guidance, while the discount rate for claims provisions was 2.4% (2.1%), reflecting a largely unchanged interest rate environment. Tryg delivered an expense ratio of 13.6% and continues to focus on tight cost control and efficient operations.
Other income and costs amounted to DKK 382m (DKK 409m) and were broadly in line with expectations.
In accordance with Tryg's dividend policy, Tryg will pay a flat quarterly dividend of DKK 2.05 per share. Additionally, Tryg has on 22 January 2026 announced a share buyback programme of DKK 1bn.
{21}------------------------------------------------
Business areas

Private provides insurance products to private customers in Denmark, Sweden and Norway. Private offers a range of insurance products including motor, content, house, accident, travel, motorcycle, pet and health.
68% 32%
Distribution channels Distribution channels
Online • Call centres • Own sales agents • Partner • Franchises • Bancassurance • Car dealers • Real estate agents
Brands Brands








Private Commercial
Commercial provides insurance products to small and mediumsized commercial and corporate customers in Denmark, Sweden and Norway. Commercial offers a range of insurance products including motor, property, liability, workers' compensation, travel and health.
of insurance revenue of insurance revenue
Own sales agents • Online • Call centres • Franchises • Insurance brokers • Partner • Bancassurance



{22}------------------------------------------------
Private
Results 2025
Insurance service result
The Private segment reported an insurance service result of DKK 4,931m (DKK 4,247m) and a combined ratio of 82.1% (83.7%). The higher insurance service result was supported by topline growth, an improvement in the underlying claims ratio driven by price adjustments, a higher run-off and a more favourable weather claims experience. Motor claims frequency eased during the year and average claims stabilised, while the implemented pricing initiatives continued to cater for inflationary pressure in the business.
Insurance revenue
Insurance revenue amounted to DKK 27,525m (DKK 26,100m), corresponding to growth of 4.7% (6.9%) measured in local currencies and was in line with expectations. Across geographies, growth was mainly driven by price adjustments to mitigate inflationary pressure and improve profitability. Pricing actions were largest in Norway and part of efforts to improve profitability, which has picked up significantly throughout the year.
Competition generally remains healthy across Scandinavia, while price adjustments were mostly accepted by customers, demonstrating a high level of customer satisfaction despite retention rates slightly declining in Denmark. Towards the end of the year, retention rates stabilised and started to show slightly positive trends in Denmark and Norway, while retention rates in Sweden improved throughout the year
as a result of our continued efforts to improve customer satisfaction.
Several initiatives have been implemented to strengthen commercial momentum in Sweden. Trygg-Hansa has rejoined the Swedish Hockey League as an official partner. In addition, several new partnerships within motor have been entered and existing partnerships expanded. The company focuses on both the traditional car dealerships and the online marketplace for electric and hybrid cars. The ambition is for Trygg-Hansa to grow market shares through new and deepened partnerships based on many years of experience with strategic partnerships in Denmark and Norway. Additionally in Q4, Trygg-Hansa launched a redesigned home insurance product, which is environmentally certified. The home insurance 'large-package' was ranked as best in the market according to the Swedish Consumers Insurance Bureau.
Claims
The claims ratio, net of reinsurance, was 69.2% (70.9%). The underlying claims ratio improved by 20 basis points in 2025, marking four quarters with a positive and improving trend throughout the year. This positive development was primarily driven by the strong profitability improvement in Norway. The positive underlying development was supplemented by a more favourable weather claims experience of 1.5% (2.5%) in 2025. Run-off stood at 2.1%, a more normalised level compared to the level last year (1.3%).
Key figures - Private
| Q4 | Q4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 |
| Insurance revenue | 7,086 | 6,621 | 27,525 | 26,100 |
| Gross claims | -4,933 | -4,662 | -18,891 | -18,193 |
| Insurance operating costs | -903 | -810 | -3,542 | -3,337 |
| Insurance service expenses | -5,836 | -5,472 | -22,433 | -21,530 |
| Profit/loss on gross business | 1,249 | 1,150 | 5,092 | 4,570 |
| Net expense from reinsurance contracts | 29 | -55 | -161 | -323 |
| Insurance service result | 1,278 | 1,095 | 4,931 | 4,247 |
| Run-off gains/losses, net of reinsurance | 131 | 125 | 569 | 351 |
| Key figures and ratios | ||||
| Revenue growth in local currencies (%) | 5.3 | 6.8 | 4.7 | 6.9 |
| Gross claims ratio | 69.6 | 70.4 | 68.6 | 69.7 |
| Net reinsurance ratio | -0.4 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Claims ratio, net of reinsurance | 69.2 | 71.2 | 69.2 | 70.9 |
| Expense ratio | 12.8 | 12.2 | 12.9 | 12.8 |
| Combined ratio | 82.0 | 83.5 | 82.1 | 83.7 |
| Combined ratio exclusive of run-off | 83.8 | 85.4 | 84.2 | 85.1 |
| Run-off, net of reinsurance (%) | -1.8 | -1.9 | -2.1 | -1.3 |
| Large claims, net of reinsurance (%) | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.2 |
| Weather claims, net of reinsurance (%) | 1.2 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 2.5 |
Note: Comparative figures for 2024 were restated following the updated hedging strategy as announced in the IR Newsletter of March 2025.
68% The business area accounts for 68% of the Group's total insurance revenue.
Financial highlights 2025
4.7% 4,931m 12.9% 82.1%
Revenue growth (in local currencies)
Insurance service result (DKK)
Expense ratio Combined ratio
2024: 6.9% 2024: 4,247m 2024: 12.8% 2024: 83.7%
{23}------------------------------------------------

Expenses
The expense ratio was 12.9% (12.8%), broadly in line with the same period last year. This reflects a very efficient operational setup and is considered a key competitive advantage.
Results Q4 2025
The Private segment reported a Q4 2025 insurance service result of DKK 1,278m (DKK 1,095m) and a combined ratio of 82.0% (83.5%). The increase in the insurance service result was driven by steady top-line growth, an improvement in the underlying claims ratio driven by price adjustments, and a more favourable weather claims experience, partly offset by a slightly higher expense ratio.
Insurance revenue
Insurance revenue amounted to DKK 7,086m (DKK 6,621m), corresponding to growth of 5.3% (6.8%) in local currencies. Top-line growth across geographies was primarily driven by price initiatives to offset inflationary pressure, but commercial efforts, especially in Sweden, are also beginning to show positive traction.
Claims
The claims ratio, net of reinsurance was 69.2% (71.2%), supported by an improvement in the underlying claims ratio of 30 basis points, a slightly lower level of run-off at 1.8% (1.9%) and a more benign weather claims experience at 1.2% (3.0%).
Expenses
The expense ratio increased slightly to 12.8% (12.2%). Quarterly fluctuations across segments and geographies occur from time to time, and the overall level is fully in line with expectations. The current level of expenses allows for ongoing investments in commercial initiatives and business development.
Financial highlights Q4 2025
Revenue growth (in local currencies)
5.3% 1,278m 12.8% 82.0%
Insurance service result (DKK)
Q4 2024: 6.8% Q4 2024: 1,095m Q4 2024: 12.2% Q4 2024: 83.5%
Expense ratio Combined ratio
{24}------------------------------------------------
Commercial
Results 2025
Insurance service result
From the beginning of 2025, the Commercial segment includes both commercial and corporate customers. The Commercial segment reported an insurance service result of DKK 3,015m (DKK 2,809m) and a combined ratio of 76.5% (77.5%).
The higher insurance service result builds on an increase in insurance revenue mainly driven by price initiatives, an improvement in the underlying claims ratio led by continued focus on profitability, as well as an ongoing focus on smaller and more profitable commercial customers.
Insurance revenue
Insurance revenue amounted to DKK 12,831m (DKK 12,496m), corresponding to growth of 2.0% (-1.3%) measured in local currencies, in line with expectations. Across geographies, growth was driven by price adjustments to offset inflationary pressure and improve profitability. Retention rates dipped slightly in Denmark and Norway following the prolonged period of inflation-linked price adjustments, whereas retention rates improved in Sweden. Price adjustments were mostly accepted by customers, as indicated by retention rates in all countries, which demonstrate a high level of loyalty and satisfaction within the customer base.
Claims
The claims ratio, net of reinsurance, was 61.8% (62.6%) and characterised by a slightly lower level of large claims at 3.9% (4.1%). Weather
claims were lower than the same period last year at 1.4% (2.2%). Run-off was lower at 2.5%, a more normalised level compared to the level last year (3.9%). The underlying claims ratio improved following profitability initiatives across all geographies during the year.
Expenses
The expense ratio improved to 14.7% (14.9%) driven by tight cost control throughout the organisation. The segment primarily aims to reduce distribution costs by leveraging more efficient sales channels.
Key figures - Commercial
| Q4 | Q4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 |
| Insurance revenue | 3,207 | 3,113 | 12,831 | 12,496 |
| Gross claims | -2,105 | -1,805 | -7,320 | -7,403 |
| Insurance operating costs | -500 | -489 | -1,883 | -1,859 |
| Insurance service expenses | -2,605 | -2,293 | -9,203 | -9,262 |
| Profit/loss on gross business | 602 | 819 | 3,628 | 3,234 |
| Net expense from reinsurance contracts | 38 | -206 | -614 | -425 |
| Insurance service result | 639 | 613 | 3,015 | 2,809 |
| Run-off gains/losses, net of reinsurance | 86 | 109 | 326 | 481 |
| Key figures and ratios | ||||
| Revenue growth in local currencies (%) | 1.5 | -2.4 | 2.0 | -1.3 |
| Gross claims ratio | 65.6 | 58.0 | 57.0 | 59.2 |
| Net reinsurance ratio | -1.2 | 6.6 | 4.8 | 3.4 |
| Claims ratio, net of reinsurance | 64.5 | 64.6 | 61.8 | 62.6 |
| Expense ratio | 15.6 | 15.7 | 14.7 | 14.9 |
| Combined ratio | 80.1 | 80.3 | 76.5 | 77.5 |
| Combined ratio exclusive of run-off | 82.7 | 83.8 | 79.0 | 81.4 |
| Run-off, net of reinsurance (%) | -2.7 | -3.5 | -2.5 | -3.9 |
| Large claims, net of reinsurance (%) | 4.1 | 4.5 | 3.9 | 4.1 |
| Weather claims, net of reinsurance (%) | 2.8 | 2.3 | 1.4 | 2.2 |
Note: Comparative figures for 2024 were restated following the updated hedging strategy as announced in the IR Newsletter of March 2025.
32% The business area accounts for 32% of the Group's total insurance revenue
Financial highlights 2025
2.0% 3,015m 14.7% 76.5%
Revenue growth (in local currencies) Insurance service result (DKK)
Expense ratio Combined ratio
2024: -1.3% 2024: 2,809m 2024: 14.9% 2024: 77.5%
{25}------------------------------------------------

Results Q4 2025
The Commercial segment reported a Q4 2025 insurance service result of DKK 639m (DKK 613m) and a combined ratio of 80.1% (80.3%). The quarter saw a lower level of large claims, increased weather claims and lower run-off.
Insurance revenue
Insurance revenue totalled DKK 3,207m (DKK 3,113m), corresponding to a growth rate of 1.5% ( -2.4%) measured in local currencies. Across geographies, growth was positively impacted by profitability initiatives, partly offset by slightly lower retention rates following a prolonged period of pricing initiatives to offset inflationary pressure. Growth in 2024 was impacted by the de-risking of the corporate portfolio carried out during the year.
Claims
The claims ratio, net of reinsurance, was 64.5% (64.6%), impacted by a more favourable large claims experience of 4.1% (4.5%) and a higher level of weather claims at 2.8% (2.3%). Additionally, run-off was lower at 2.7% (3.5%). The underlying claims ratio improved during the quarter, driven by continued profitability initiatives.
Expenses
The expense ratio was 15.6% (15.7%). Quarterly fluctuations across segments and geographies occur from time to time, and the overall level is fully in line with expectations. The current level of expenses allows for ongoing investments in commercial initiatives and business development.
Financial highlights Q4 2025
Revenue growth (in local currencies)
1.5% 639m 15.6% 80.1%
Insurance service result (DKK)
Expense ratio Combined ratio
Q4 2024: -2.4% Q4 2024: 613m Q4 2024: 15.7% Q4 2024: 80.3%
{26}------------------------------------------------
Investment activities
Investment result 2025
In 2025, the global investment climate was characterised by increasing geopolitical tensions and the US administration's introduction of trade tariffs across various countries and goods, which created a more volatile market environment and impacted investors' risk appetite adversely. The uncertainty weighed negatively on consumer spending and general confidence in the economic outlook and demand. To cater for the negative effects, and as a result of lower inflation expectations and slower labour markets, central banks have been lowering their short-term interest rates with Europe taking the
lead and the US following, enacting its most recent interest rate cut in December 2025. The US dollar generally depreciated in 2025 following the introduction of tariffs, whereas the Swedish krona appreciated and the Norwegian krone remained rather stable.
Tryg has benefitted from its low-risk investment strategy with the majority of its exposure towards Scandinavian covered bonds and very limited exposure towards risky assets.
The total market value of Tryg's investment portfolio was DKK 59bn at the end of Q4 2025. The investment portfolio is split into a match portfolio and a free portfolio. The match
portfolio of DKK 45bn is made up of low-risk fixed-income securities designed to minimise interest rate risk and lower capital consumption by matching the duration of the insurance liabilities. At the end of Q4 2025, the free portfolio had a market value of DKK 15bn.
In 2025, the investment portfolio reported a strong return of DKK 778m (DKK 911m in 2024 restated for the change in accounting practice related to the inflation hedge). The restated 2024 figures include a positive impact of DKK 268m from the inflation hedge.
The total investment result includes other financial income and expenses in addition to the free and match portfolios.
Match portfolio
The match portfolio reported a solid result of DKK 724m (DKK 536m). The match result is mainly driven by the yield from interest income on premium provisions, but in 2025 the match portfolio also significantly benefitted from a tightening of covered bond spreads.
Over time, the hedging strategy of the match portfolio is designed to yield the return on the premium provisions, but from time to time, and particularly during periods of volatility, larger mismatches can occur in both a positive and negative direction.
Insurance provisions are discounted with swapbased interest rates and hedged with a combination of short-duration Scandinavian covered bonds and interest rate swaps. Hence, developments in the spread between covered bonds and swap rates determine the return of the match portfolio. A narrowing of the spreads constitutes a gain, while a widening of the spreads constitutes a loss.
Short-term Scandinavian interest rates declined in 2025, therefore the expected return on premiums provisions going forward (at current interest rate levels) will be around DKK 200m annually.
Free portfolio
The free portfolio reported a result of DKK 320m (DKK 672m), which is lower than 2024 due to the de-risking of the free portfolio carried out late last year. Tryg's asset of choice, Scandinavian covered bonds, reported a return of 2.6%, while the government bonds (a significantly smaller asset class for Tryg) reported a return of 3.1%. Real estate reported a positive return of DKK 8m. At the end of Q4 2025, covered and government bonds represented some 84% of the free portfolio, while real estate represented 16%.
Real estate will not be an asset of choice in the long term, as disclosed at the CMD in 2024, and in 2025 Tryg managed to reduce real estate exposure by more than DKK 900m, thereby lowering (all else being equal) the SCR by some DKK 95m.
Other financial income and expenses
Tryg books various items against this line. On a normalised basis, approximately half of the amount is made up of interest expenses on subordinated loans. Also included are costs related to currency hedges to protect own funds, the net result of the inflation hedge and
Financial highlights 2025
320m
Free portfolio (DKK) 724m
Match portfolio
778m
Total investment return (DKK)
Financial highlights Q4 2025
31m
Free portfolio (DKK) 187m
Match portfolio (DKK) 171m
Total investment return (DKK)
{27}------------------------------------------------
costs related to running the investment activities.
Other financial income and expenses amounted to DKK -267m (DKK -297m), better than guidance of DKK -300m annually.
Investment result Q4 2025
In Q4 2025, the investment portfolio produced a total return of DKK 171m (DKK -265m). The increase was mainly driven by other financial income and expenses being less negative by DKK 201m as well as strong returns on the free and match portfolios. During Q4 2025, Tryg sold real estate exposure amounting to DKK 500m, reducing (all else being equal) the SCR by approximately DKK 50m.
The match portfolio reported a result of DKK 187m (DKK 56m). The return of the match
portfolio is designed to yield the interest income on the premium provisions, but in this quarter the match portfolio also benefitted from a tightening of covered bond spreads.
The free portfolio reported a result of DKK 31m (DKK -73m). Tryg's investments in Scandinavian covered bonds reported a return of 0.4%, while the government bonds, constituting only a small part of the portfolio, reported a return of 0.5%, equal to an annualised return of 1.4% and 1.9%, respectively. Real estate reported a negative return of DKK -14m (DKK -53m), a positive development from 2024.
Other financial income and expenses amounted to DKK -47m (DKK -248m), notably better than guided. The comparison period included negative impacts from inflation and FX hedging.
Modelling the free portfolio
The free portfolio is made up of approx. 85% Scandinavian covered bonds and government bonds with an average duration of 2 years as well as approx. 15% in real estate. To model the return of the Scandinavian covered and government bonds' portfolio, a weighted average of the following two Bloomberg indexes can be used, 50% NYK RCMB2 and 50% NYKRCMG2. The real estate portfolio is assumed to produce a normalised annual return of 6.5%, as disclosed at the CMD in December 2024.
Return - Investments
| Q4 | Q4 | Market value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | 31.12.2025 | 31.12.2024 |
| Free portfolio, gross return | 31 | -73 | 320 | 672 | 14,714 | 16,560 |
| Match portfolio | 187 | 56 | 724 | 536 | 44,550 | 43,969 |
| Other financial income and expenses | -47 | -248 | -267 | -297 | - | - |
| Investment result | 171 | -265 | 778 | 911 | 59,264 | 60,529 |
Return - free portfolio
| Q4 | Q4 | Q4 | Q4 | Market value | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DKKm | 2025 | 2025 (%) | 2024 | 2024 (%) | 2025 | 2025 (%) | 2024 | 2024 (%) | 31.12.2025 | 31.12.2024 |
| Covered Bonds | 41 | 0.4 | 49 | 0.6 | 287 | 2.6 | 237 | 3.3 | 11,519 | 13,058 |
| Government Bonds | 4 | 0.5 | 0 | 0.1 | 26 | 3.1 | 16 | 2.3 | 854 | 224 |
| Real Estate | -14 | -0.6 | -53 | -1.6 | 8 | 0.3 | -142 | -4.2 | 2,342 | 3,278 |
| De-risked investments | 0 | 0.0 | -69 | -1.8 | 0 | 0.0 | 561 | 10.7 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 31 | 0.2 | -73 | -0.4 | 320 | 2.2 | 672 | 3.6 | 14,714 | 16,560 |
{28}------------------------------------------------
Responsibility in investments
Tryg manages its investment portfolio through a combination of in-house expertise and external asset managers. The investment strategy is firmly anchored in responsible principles aligned with Agenda 2030 and the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) with a strong emphasis on stability and transparency. Under UN SDG 13: Climate Action, Tryg has committed to the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) and set an investment target aligned with the Paris Agreement. The target was validated by SBTi in 2025.
SBTi-aligned investment target
Tryg has committed to reducing all in-use operational GHG emissions from its real estate covered bond investment portfolio by 45.9% per square meter by 20301.
Sustainability risks and portfolio exclusions
The majority of Tryg's investment portfolio is allocated to Scandinavian covered bonds, recognised as low-risk and well-regulated instruments. This approach significantly reduces sustainability-related risks, as investments are primarily directed towards government and covered bonds, essentially financing private homes and office buildings. Subject to market conditions, green bonds are selectively added to the portfolio to support climate change mitigation while maintaining alignment with the company's risk-return profile.
Given the investment focus on covered bonds, Tryg does not have equity exposure to companies involved in thermal coal, oil, gas, nuclear power or any other sectors or companies that fail to address confirmed controversial, environmentally harmful or other activities that conflict with our ethical standards - including all types of weapons, military services, tobacco, pornography, gambling, alcohol, mining and the chemical industries.
All investments are regularly screened to ensure compliance with Tryg's commitments under the UN Global Compact and Tryg's overall strategy for sustainability towards 2027.
External manager selection and monitoring
When selecting external investment managers, Tryg conducts a thorough due diligence process followed by ongoing monitoring to ensure they effectively manage sustainability-related risks and contribute to positive environmental and social outcomes. Tryg prioritises financial products classified under Article 8 and Article 9 of the EU Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR), or those with a comparable level of ESG integration.
All Tryg's external managers are signatories of the UN Principles for Responsible Investment (UN PRI) and most have made explicit net-zero commitments and actively participate in coalitions promoting sustainable development and the green transition.
Policy for governing responsible investment practices
Tryg's Responsible Investment Policy governs the company's approach to ensuring that investment activities are managed with due consideration for sustainability-related risks and their potential adverse societal impacts, and to support sustainability-related outcomes in line with Tryg's SBTi-aligned investment target.
Responsible investment policy (link)
Ethical screening process
To ensure alignment with Tryg's values, sustainability strategy and ambitions, all holdings are screened annually for exposure to controversial weapons and violations of the UN Global Compact's Ten Principles. The screening includes data from an external ESG provider and considers relevant UN and EU regulations. Confirmed breaches trigger a formal escalation process.
Process for ethical screening (link)

{29}------------------------------------------------

Tax governance
Tryg Group acknowledges that the taxes we pay are a significant contribution to sustainable societies in the countries we do business in. Tryg Group is a transparent and responsible tax payer, and our tax governance and key tax compliance focus is on ensuring that all taxes paid are fair and in accordance with legislation.
The tax governance approach is embedded in the Tryg Tax Policy inspired by GRI Sustainability Reporting standard #207 regarding tax. The Tax Policy governs all entities in the Tryg Group, all taxes paid by the Tryg Group and, to the extent possible, also to investments made by Tryg Group.
The Tryg Tax Policy is overseen by the Chair of the Tryg Risk Committee and reviewed and approved annually by the Executive Board and the Supervisory Board of Tryg. Our approach to tax risk management is therefore aligned with the Tryg Group's risk management and actively monitored to ensure that tax positions are within the strategic and business objectives.
Tax matters are a part of the finance function and overseen by the Group CFO. Tax operations and tax risk management are undertaken on a day-to-day basis by the tax team in Tryg.
The Tryg Tax Policy is available on our website at https://tryg.com/en/governance/policies.
Corporate income tax 2025
Corporate income tax amounted to DKK 1,807m (DKK 1,488m), corresponding to an effective tax rate for Tryg Group of 25%.
The tax rate is primarily impacted by the geographical split of the business across the three Scandinavian countries. Tryg Group did not receive any tax relief or tax grants from governments in 2025.
The effective tax rate for 2026 is expected to be approximately 24.5%.
Pillar II - Global minimum tax regime
Tryg Group is within scope of the OECD global minimum tax regulations, also known as Pillar II (EU Minimum Tax Directive and OECD Safe Harbour rules). Based on the mandatory exception, Tryg has assessed that no entities in the Group will be impacted by a top-up tax in 2025.
Total tax impact - the Tryg Tax Impact
Through various taxes and contributions,Tryg Group contributes to tax authorities, etc. in a number of jurisdictions. The contributions arise from our operations and business activities and are collectively Tryg Group´s Total Tax Contribution (the Tryg Tax Impact). The Total Tax Contribution amounts to DKK 6,675m in 2025.
Taxes arising from Tryg Group´s operations and business activities are either borne by Tryg Group or collected by Tryg Group on behalf of tax authorities, etc. Taxes borne by Tryg Group are those imposed as a result of Tryg Group´s business transactions, investments and profits, such as income tax, withholding taxes and VAT. Taxes collected relate mainly to Tryg Group´s customers and employees, and comprise mainly insurance premium tax, stamp duties, payroll
taxes and other contributions such as guarantee fund taxes, natural hazard tax and similar.
For reporting purposes, Tryg´s Total Tax Contribution is consolidated into the following five categories: Corporate taxes, VAT, Insurance Premium Tax and contributions, Employee Tax and Employer Taxes.
For further details on Tryg Group´s Total Tax Impact, please refer to note 13.
Tryg Group's Total Tax Impact
- Insurance premium
- Taxes and other contributions
- Stamp duties
Our customers Our business & people Our investments
-
Corporate income tax
-
Employee and employer tax (tax on payroll)
-
VAT
-
Withholding taxes
-
Stamp duties and transaction taxes
Taxes born + taxes collected = Total Tax Contribution

{30}------------------------------------------------

{31}------------------------------------------------
Corporate governance
Tryg focuses on managing the company in accordance with the principles of good corporate governance and generally complies with the Danish recommendations prepared by the Committee on Corporate Governance. The Recommendations on Corporate Governance are available at corporategovernance.dk. At tryg.com, Tryg has published its statutory corporate governance report based on the 'comply-or-explain' principle for each individual recommendation. This section on corporate governance is an excerpt of the corporate governance report.

Download Tryg's Statutory Corporate Governance Report at www.tryg.com/en/ downloads-2025
Dialogue between Tryg, its shareholders and other stakeholders
Tryg's Investor Relations (IR) department maintains regular contact with analysts and investors.
Together with the Executive Board, the Investor Relations team organises investor meetings, conference calls and participates in conferences in Denmark and abroad.
The Supervisory Board is regularly informed about the dialogue with investors and other stakeholders. Tryg has an IR policy which states that all company announcements may be published in English only. Tryg publishes quarterly interim reports in English.
Tryg also prepares quarterly investor presentations which are used in the dialogue with investors and analysts. Additionally, Tryg also regularly publishes IR newsletters on relevant topics. All announcements, financial reports, presentations and newsletters are available at tryg.com. This material provides all stakeholders with a comprehensive picture of Tryg's position and performance.
The consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with IFRS Accounting Standards. At tryg.com, stakeholders are invited to subscribe to press releases, company announcements and insider trading announcements. A number of internal guidelines ensure that the disclosure of pricesensitive information complies with legislation and stock exchange codes of conduct. Tryg has adopted a number of policies describing the relationship between different stakeholders.

See the IR Policy at www.tryg.com/en/ governance/policies
Annual General Meeting
Tryg holds an Annual General Meeting (AGM) every year. As required by the Danish Companies Act and Tryg's Articles of Association, the AGM is convened via a company announcement and at tryg.com subject to at least three weeks' notice. Shareholders may also opt to receive the notice by post or email. The notice contains information about the time and venue, or technical requirements for attending the meeting virtually, as well as an agenda for the meeting.
All shareholders are encouraged to attend the general meeting. If the Supervisory Board decides to hold general meetings exclusively through electronic means, detailed information concerning registration and procedures for virtual attendance, including how to ask questions and submit comments and cast votes, will be made available on Tryg's website and in the notice convening such electronic general meetings. Thus, there will be clear instructions and feedback channels ensuring sufficient safeguards for shareholders' participation rights at potential future virtual-only meetings.
Shareholders may propose items to be included on the agenda for the AGM and may ask questions before and at the meeting. Shareholders may vote at the AGM, by post, or appoint the Supervisory Board or a third party as their proxy. Shareholders may consider each item on the agenda. The proxy form and form for voting by post are available at tryg.com before the AGM.
Furthermore, prior to the general meeting, Tryg invites shareholders to submit written questions to be considered at the general meeting. Information on how to exercise shareholders' rights at the general meeting is clearly communicated to shareholders and published at tryg.com.
Share and capital structure
Tryg's share capital comprises a single share class, and all shares rank pari passu. The largest shareholder, TryghedsGruppen smba, owns 49.4%1 of the shares and is the only shareholder owning more than 5% of the company's shares.
The Supervisory Board ensures that Tryg's capital structure is aligned with the needs of the Group and the interests of its shareholders and that it complies with the requirements applicable to Tryg as a financial undertaking. Tryg has adopted a capital plan and a contingency capital plan, which are reviewed annually by the Supervisory Board.
Depending on the financial results, each year the Supervisory Board proposes the distribution of quarterly dividends, and possibly an extraordinary annual dividend if a further adjustment of the capital structure is required.
Duties, responsibilities and composition of the Supervisory Board
The Supervisory Board is responsible for the central strategic management and financial control of Tryg and for ensuring that Tryg's business setup is robust. This is achieved by monitoring targets and frameworks based on regular and systematic reviews of strategy and risks.
The Executive Board reports to the Supervisory Board on strategies and action plans, market developments and Group performance, capital requirements and risks, etc. The Supervisory Board holds an annual strategy seminar to decide on and/or adjust the Group's strategy to sustain value creation in the company. The Executive Board works with the Supervisory Board to ensure that the Group's strategy is developed and monitored. The Supervisory Board ensures that the necessary skills and financial resources are available for Tryg to achieve its strategic targets. The Supervisory
1 Calculated excluding Tryg's own shares
{32}------------------------------------------------
Board specifies its activities in a set of rules of procedure and an annual cycle for its work.
- Each year, the Supervisory Board reviews and adopts the rules of procedure of the Supervisory Board and the Executive Board, comprising relevant policies, guidelines and instructions describing reporting requirements and requirements for communication with the Executive Board. Financial legislation also requires the Executive Board to disclose all relevant information to the Supervisory Board and report on compliance with limits defined by the Supervisory Board and in legislation.
Supervisory Board composition and diversity of members1
The current ten external members of the Supervisory Board were elected by the Annual General Meeting for a term of one year. Of the ten members elected at the annual general meeting, six (60%), and thus the majority, are independent, thus complying with recommendation 3.2.1. in the Recommendations on Corporate Governance. The other four members are dependent, as they are appointed by Tryg's largest shareholder, TryghedsGruppen. See pages 43-46 for information on the individual Supervisory Board members. To ensure the integration of new talent into the Supervisory Board, members elected by the annual general meeting may hold office for a maximum of twelve years.

See details about the independent board members in the section Supervisory Board on pages 43-46 and at www.tryg.com/ en/governance/management/ supervisory-board
The Supervisory Board has 15 members in total, all of whom are non-executive, including five employee-elected members. In total, the Board
currently comprises seven women and eight men (including one male and four female employee representatives). Three out of the ten members elected at the Annual General Meeting are women.
Tryg must target gender balance among Supervisory Board members elected by the General Meeting and employee representatives by 30 June 2026. With the current size of the Supervisory Board, gender balance will be reached with four members of one gender and six of the other for members elected by the Annual General Meeting, and two members of one gender and three of the other for members elected by the employees.
As of today, Tryg does not meet this target. Among the ten members elected by the Annual General Meeting, seven are men and three are women, below the threshold of four women (40%). Among the five employee-elected members, one is male and four are female, also below the required two members of the underrepresented gender. With reference to Company Announcement no. 40–2025, published 4 December 2025, a female candidate has been nominated for election at the upcoming Annual General Meeting. If elected, the distribution among General Meeting-elected members will be six men and four women (60/40), meeting the target for gender balance.
Tryg wishes to keep a balanced distribution in the composition of the Supervisory Board with respect to gender, nationality and age. The members are aged between 39 and 70 years, are from Denmark, Norway and Sweden and represent the markets that Tryg operates in.
Composition of the Supervisory Board
| 2025 | 2024 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ESRS ID | Number | Number | |
| Size and roles | |||
| GOV-1_01 Number of non-executive members | 10 | 9 | |
| GOV-1_02 | Number of executive members | 0 | 0 |
| GOV-1_03 | Number of employee representatives | 5 | 5 |
| GOV-1_07 | Independent Supervisory Board members (%) | 60 | 67 |
| GOV-1_05 | Diversity metrics | ||
| Board members age group, under 30 years | 0 | 0 | |
| Board members age group, 30-49 years | 3 | 3 | |
| Board members age group, 50 and above | 12 | 11 | |
| GOV-1_06 | Board gender diversity ratio, shareholder-elected (female %) | 30 | 33 |
| Board gender diversity ratio, shareholder-elected | |||
| Male | 7 | 6 | |
| Female | 3 | 3 | |
| Board gender diversity ratio, employee-elected | |||
| Male | 1 | 1 | |
| Female | 4 | 4 |
Accounting policies
Size and roles
The Supervisory Board consists solely of non-executive members, meaning they have no management responsibilities in Tryg. In addition, the Board also includes employee representatives elected for four-year terms [GOV-1_01-03].
Independent Supervisory Board members are assessed based on their relationship to TryghedsGruppen. Details on Board composition and independence are available on Tryg's website, or in the CVs on pages 43 - 46. Figures exclude employee representatives [GOV-1_07].
Diversity metrics
Age and gender diversity are calculated as of the end of the reporting period [GOV-1_05]. The gender diversity ratio represents the average ratio of female to male board members for shareholder-elected positions [GOV-1_06]. The Board's gender diversity ratio, expressed in numbers, is reported in accordance with the Danish Gender Balance Act (Act No. 1602 of 17/12/2024), which defines gender as female and male. Gender balance is assessed separately for shareholder-elected and employee-elected Board members.
{33}------------------------------------------------
Tryg's employees are entitled to elect a number of Board representatives, who have the same rights, duties and responsibilities as any other member of the Supervisory Board. To ensure geographic representation, employee representatives are divided across the three countries with two representatives from Denmark, two from Sweden and one from Norway.
The Supervisory Board considers the composition, development, risk and succession plans of the Executive Board in connection with the annual evaluation of the Executive Board, and regularly in connection with Board meetings. Each year, the Supervisory Board discusses Tryg's activities to guarantee diversity at management levels.
Tryg attaches great importance to diversity at all management levels. Tryg has adopted a policy on gender balance in management that sets out specific targets to ensure diversity, equal opportunities and access to management positions for qualified men and women. Read more about the policy, specific initiatives, targets and progress on pages 96 - 99.
Skills and expertise available – Supervisory Board1
The Supervisory Board performs an annual evaluation of its work and skills to ensure that it possesses the expertise required to perform its duties in the best possible way. In addition to the annual self-evaluation, an assessment is facilitated with external assistance every three years to ensure objectivity in the evaluation process. The Supervisory Board focuses primarily on the following qualifications and skills: business judgement, problem solving, networking, risk management, succession management, general management, CFO/audit, people and organisation, ESG, business
development, financial services, risk and regulatory compliance, insurance – commercial and product insurance – technical/financial modelling, IT & digitalisation, value chain optimisation and customer journey. As part of the evaluation, the Supervisory Board also focuses on other executive positions and board memberships held by the members of the Supervisory Board, including the level of commitment and workload associated with each position to prevent potential overboarding. The evaluation is based on the individual board member's ability to devote the necessary time for preparation, their performance, attendance and participation at committee and board meetings in Tryg.
The overall conclusion of the 2025 evaluation was that Tryg has a value-adding and professional Supervisory Board that works efficiently and in accordance with sound governance principles. The evaluation resulted in a continued strong focus on ESG, Diversity and Digitalisation.
The Board has broad representation of members with ESG experience, as reflected in the CVs of each board member.

See CVs and descriptions of skills in the section Supervisory Board on pages 43-46 and at www.tryg.com/en/governance/ management/supervisory-board
Duties and composition of the Executive Board
Each year, the Supervisory Board reviews and adopts the rules of procedure of the Supervisory Board and the Executive Board, comprising relevant policies, guidelines and instructions describing reporting requirements and requirements for communication with the Executive Board. Financial legislation also requires the Executive Board to disclose all relevant information to the Supervisory Board
and report on compliance with limits defined by the Supervisory Board and in legislation.
The Supervisory Board considers the composition, development, risk and succession plans of the Executive Board in connection with the annual evaluation of the Executive Board, and regularly in connection with Board meetings. Each year, the Supervisory Board discusses Tryg's activities to guarantee diversity at management levels. Tryg attaches great importance to diversity at all management levels. Tryg has adopted a Policy on gender balance in management that sets out specific targets to ensure diversity and equal opportunities and access to management positions for qualified men and women. For several years, Tryg has had a strong focus on diversity and has been aiming to increase the number of women in management positions to 40%2. The number of women in management positions increased from 41%2 in 2024 to 43% in 2025, exceeding the initial target. Progress has been driven by having a continuous focus on the recruitment and HR processes.

See the General action plan for diversity including women in management at www.tryg.com/en/governance/policies
Board committees
Tryg has an Audit Committee, a Risk Committee, a Nomination Committee, a Remuneration Committee and an IT Data Committee. The frameworks for the committees' work are defined in their terms of reference.

The Board Committees' terms of reference can be found at www.tryg.com/ en/governance/management/ supervisory-board/board-committees including descriptions of members,
meeting frequency, responsibilities and activities during the year.
All members of the Audit Committee and three out of five members of the Risk Committee, including the committee chair, are independent. Three out of the five members of the Remuneration Committee are independent, including the committee chair. Two out of three members of the Nomination Committee are independent, including the committee chair. Three out of five members of the IT Data Committee are independent, including the committee chair.
Board committee members are elected primarily on the basis of their specialist skills considered important by the Supervisory Board. The involvement of the employee representatives in the committees is also considered important. The committees exclusively prepare matters for decision by the entire Supervisory Board.

The specialist skills of all members are also described at www.tryg.com/en/ governance/management/supervisoryboard/about-board
Remuneration of management
Tryg has adopted a remuneration policy for Tryg in general that includes specific schemes for the Supervisory Board, the Executive Board and other employees in Tryg whose activities have a material impact on the risk profile of the company - risk-takers. The remuneration policy was adopted by the Supervisory Board in January 2025 and approved by the annual general meeting on 26 March 2025.
1 ESRS disclosure points incorporated by reference in this section (ESRS ID): GOV-1_04, 15, 16, 17
2 As referenced in Tryg's Gender balance policy
{34}------------------------------------------------
The Chair of the Supervisory Board reports on Tryg's remuneration policy each year in connection with the review of the annual report at the annual general meeting. The Board's proposal for the remuneration of the Supervisory Board for the current financial year is also submitted for approval by the shareholders at the annual general meeting.
Remuneration of the Supervisory Board
Members of Tryg's Supervisory Board receive a fixed fee and are not covered by any form of incentive or severance programme or pension scheme. Their remuneration is based on trends in peer companies and benchmarked against Nasdaq Copenhagen OMX C25, taking into account the required skills and efforts and the scope of the Supervisory Board's work, including the number of meetings held. The remuneration received by the Chair of the Supervisory Board is three times that received by ordinary members, while the Deputy Chair's remuneration is twice that received by ordinary members of the Supervisory Board.
Remuneration of the Executive Board
Members of the Executive Board are employed on a contractual basis, and all terms of their remuneration are established by the Supervisory Board within the framework of the approved remuneration policy.
Tryg wants to strike an appropriate balance between management remuneration, predictable risk and value creation for the company's shareholders in the short and long term.
The Executive Board's remuneration consists of a fixed base salary, a pension contribution of 25% of the base salary and other benefits. The base salary must be competitive and appropriate for the market and provide
sufficient motivation for all members of the Executive Board to do their best to realise the company's defined targets.
Furthermore, Tryg has an incentive programme for the Executive Board with a variable pay element of up to 50% of the fixed salary including pension.
The variable pay consists of a Long-Term Incentive Programme (LTI) and a Short-Term Incentive Programme (STI).
The purpose of the incentive programmes is to ensure alignment of financial interests between the participants and Tryg's shareholders, to create correlation between remuneration and performance, to retain the participants in question in Tryg and to contribute to Tryg's longterm results.

Read more about remuneration at Tryg in the Remuneration policy and in the Remuneration Report at www.tryg.com/ en/governance/remuneration
Independent and internal audit
The Supervisory Board ensures monitoring by competent and independent auditors. The Group's internal auditor attends all board meetings as well as meetings in the Audit Committee and Risk Committee. Involvement of the internal audit function is also extended to ESG and CSRD assurance. The independent auditor attends the annual board meeting where the annual report is presented as well as meetings in the Audit Committee and Risk Committee.
The annual general meeting appoints an independent auditor recommended by the Supervisory Board. At least once a year, the auditors meet with the Audit Committee without the presence of the Executive Board. The Audit Committee chair deals with any matters that need to be reported to the Supervisory Board.
Deviations and explanations
Tryg complies with all the Recommendations on Corporate Governance.

{35}------------------------------------------------
Capital and risk management
Risk management is a key function at Tryg. The assessment and management of Tryg's aggregated risk and associated capital requirement constitute a core element in the management of the company.
Tryg's risk management is based on the targets and strategy and the risk exposure limits determined by the Supervisory Board.
Tryg's Supervisory Board defines the framework for the company's target risk appetite and thereby the capital which must be available to cover any losses. The company's risk management is based on four risk categories: Strategic and business risk, Insurance risk, Investment risk and Operational risk. A detailed description of these can be found in the tables below.

Strategic and business risk
Financial losses or lost opportunities due to a lack of ability to carry out business plans and strategies.
This includes the risk of not being able to adjust to changing market conditions in a timely fashion.
Tryg is one of the most successful non-life insurance companies in Scandinavia.
Tryg has chosen to implement a decentralised organisation with a large degree of autonomy for each business unit. This ensures a timely reaction to changing market conditions in the separate business units.
The risk management policy adopted by the Supervisory Board sets out tolerance limits and guidelines for risk management.
The strategy process sets out overall strategic objectives. This is done as a bottom-up process where the individual business units contribute with concrete business plans.
Definition Strategy Risk Management Objectives and methods
Risk management carries out ongoing risk identification and assessment to ensure that all existing and emerging strategic and business risks are reported to the Supervisory Board on a quarterly basis - thus providing close monitoring of each business unit with regard to their performance towards the overall strategic objectives.
{36}------------------------------------------------
Insurance risk
The risk that insurance premiums are insufficient to cover the compensation and other costs associated with the insurance business.
The risk of the insurance provisions being inadequate.
Taking on insurance risk is the cornerstone of Tryg's business model. It is therefore naturally the area where Tryg has the largest risk appetite.
Tryg's main focus is to write non-life insurance business in Scandinavia with a focus on the retail segment. The Private and Commercial businesses are considered the most attractive segments due to their higher margins while volatility and capital requirements are lower than other segments. The insurance portfolio is well-diversified and profitable with an overweight on the retail segment.
Tryg has a conservative approach to claims provisioning
The insurance risk policy adopted by the Supervisory Board sets out general guidelines for permitted insurance risk. This includes guidelines for provisioning, general underwriting principles, new products, profitability measuring, reinsurance, etc.
Capital Markets Day targets for ROOF and UW results set the overall ambition for profitability versus capital consumption (measure of unexpected risk).
Definition Strategy Risk Management Objectives and methods
Day-to-day monitoring of developments in the insurance business (premium growth, underlying profitability, capital consumption, etc.) is key to ensuring development in line with desired risk appetite.
Reinsurance is used to reduce the underwriting risk in situations where this cannot be achieved to a sufficient degree via ordinary diversification. The retention limit specifies the maximum loss that Tryg is willing to take on a specific event. The capacity of the reinsurance programme is set so that it is very unlikely that a breach will occur. Both the retention limit and the capacity are approved by the Supervisory Board.
The internal model used to calculate the solvency capital requirements in Solvency II is used to allocate capital consumption to the business and thereby ensure sufficient profitability in the insurance business.
The actuary function calculates the insurance provisions based on the guidelines set out in the insurance risk policy. These are regularly presented to the Supervisory Board.
{37}------------------------------------------------
Investment risk
Financial losses due to changes in the value of financial assets or liabilities.
Tryg has decided to divide its investment assets into the free portfolio and the match portfolio.
The strategy for the match portfolio is to mitigate interest rate risk from provisions.
Tryg's free portfolio mainly consists of highrated covered bonds and the strategy is to support Tryg's dividend policy and ROOF target.
The investment risk policy adopted by the Supervisory Board sets out general guidelines and specific tolerance limits for permitted investment risk.
Definition Strategy Risk Management Objectives and methods
Daily reporting on investment return on all asset classes.
Independent daily control ensures compliance with permitted risk-taking.
Operational risk
Operational risk is understood as the risk of loss due to inadequate or failed internal processes, people and/or system errors, or as a result of external events.
The Supervisory Board sets out the overall strategy regarding operational risk.
The operational risk policy adopted by the Supervisory Board sets out tolerance limits and general guidelines for operational risk. This includes general guidelines for IT security, physical security, compliance, fraud, money laundering, contingency planning and model risk.
Definition Strategy Risk Management Objectives and methods
Ongoing identification, measurement, management, monitoring and reporting on risks and incidents potentially resulting in a loss or a near loss for Tryg.
This is ensured by implemented methods covering incident management, operational risk self-assessments and internal controls, and through business continuity management.
{38}------------------------------------------------
Capital management
Capital management and capital modelling are central and key functions of the finance team at Tryg. Capital management broadly covers the company's current and future capital requirements, capital allocation to the different lines of business and required returns. In addition, capital management analyses the dividend outlook and the ability of the company to meet its return on own funds target (ROOF).
Tryg's solvency ratio is a function of developments in own funds and the solvency capital requirement (based on the approved partial internal model). Tryg has modelled the insurance risk internally, while all other models are based on the standard formula. The capital model is based on Tryg's risk profile and takes into consideration the composition of Tryg's insurance portfolio, geographical diversification, reinsurance programme, investment mix and overall level of profitability. The solvency ratio was 196% at year-end 2025 compared to 196% at year-end 2024. The solvency position was positively impacted by a temporary refinancing effect of 3pp related to the issuance of new restricted Tier 1 capital in November 2025 and the subsequent call of the existing Tier 1 capital instrument in January 2026.
The key components of Tryg's own funds are shareholders' tangible equity, qualifying debt instruments (both Tier 1 and Tier 2 debt) and future profit. Own funds totalled DKK 13,570m at year-end 2025 vs DKK 13,239m at year-end 2024. The development includes an extraordinary share buyback of DKK 1bn announced in connection with the Annual Report 2025 and fully deducted from own funds at the end of 2025. Furthermore, own funds include the residual part (approx. 30%) of the SEK 1.0bn RTier 1 which was not bought back in connection with the issue of new RTier 1 in November 2025. The residual part will be
deducted from own funds from Q1 2026. The development in own funds was followed by a slight decrease in the solvency capital requirement (SCR), which resulted in a slightly lower solvency ratio.
The solvency capital requirement (SCR) is calculated in such a way that Tryg should be able to honour its obligations in 199 out of 200 years. At year-end 2025, Tryg's SCR was DKK 6,916m compared to DKK 6,769m at year-end 2024.
Tryg's solvency ratio continues to display low sensitivity towards movements in the capital markets.
Fixed-income securities represent some 95% of Tryg's invested assets, therefore the highest sensitivity is towards spread risk, where a widening/tightening of 100 basis points would impact the solvency ratio by approximately 15 percentage points (covered bonds). The low sensitivity towards interest rate risk is due to an active strategy of mitigating interest rate risk through the match investment portfolio and interest rate swaps.
The relatively low sensitivity towards currency risk is due to Tryg's FX strategy of reducing FX risk on the balance sheet and thereby protecting the solvency ratio and dividend capacity.
Shareholders' remuneration
The Supervisory Board regularly assesses Tryg's capital structure in light of future internal earnings forecasts and balance sheet needs. The projections include initiatives set out in the company's strategy for the coming years and are also based on the most significant risks identified by the company.

{39}------------------------------------------------
Capital adequacy is measured in relation to Tryg's strategic targets, including the return on own funds target (ROOF) and the dividend policy.
Tryg will pay a Q4 dividend per share of DKK 2.05 on 27 January 2026 after having paid a dividend for the first nine months of DKK 6.15 per share, bringing the total for the full year to DKK 8.20 per share.
Tryg announced a share buyback of DKK 1bn in connection with the Annual Report 2025. TryghedsGruppen, Tryg's largest shareholder, is not participating in the buyback.
TryghedsGruppen owns 49.4%** of the shares, with the ongoing buyback facilitating an increased ownership level towards the stated 50% plus target.
Tryg continues to aim to offer a nominally stable and increasing ordinary dividend on an annual basis. The targeted payout ratio of 60-90% (based on operating earnings) is secondary to the aim of increasing the annual dividend.
Moody's rating
Tryg has an 'A1' (positive outlook) insurance financial strength rating (IFSR) from Moody's. The rating agency highlights Tryg's strong position in the Nordic P&C market, robust profitability, very good asset quality and relatively low financial leverage. Moody's also assigned an 'A3' rating to Tryg's Tier 2 debt and a 'Baa3' rating to Tryg's Tier 1 debt.
Own funds Solvency Capital Requirement Shareholder remuneration Solvency ratio development
Ordinary
(DKKm) (DKKm) (DKK per share) (%)

Extraordinary Share buyback (5bn) Extraordinary Share buyback (1bn)
*2021 DPS impacted by the higher number of shares at 653m (301m end of 2020) following the DKK 37bn rights issue to fund the acquisition of RSA Scandinavia.



** Calculated excluding Tryg's own shares
{40}------------------------------------------------
Investor information
Investor Relations (IR) is responsible for Tryg's communication with the capital markets. It is important that investors, analysts and other stakeholders can form a true and fair view of company developments, including Tryg's financial results. For this reason, Tryg's IR team strives to be as open and transparent as possible to ensure that stakeholders' information requirements are met at the highest possible level. IR is in charge of communication with equity investors, fixed income investors and rating agencies.
After the publication of quarterly and annual reports, Tryg's management and IR team ordinarily travel extensively to meet with shareholders and potential investors. Quarterly analyst presentations are typically held in Copenhagen and London. Tryg also attends investor meetings and various financial conferences at a local and global level. In 2025, Tryg's Executive Board and Investor Relations team met around 300 investors from all over the world. The majority of analyst and investor meetings and conferences were held in-person across Europe and North America.
The Tryg share is currently covered by 20 analysts, who continuously update their recommendations and earnings forecasts. Tryg hosts an annual Analyst Day focusing on selected aspects of the business, while a more in-depth Capital Markets Day, where new financial targets are unveiled, is hosted every three years. Tryg hosted a Capital Markets Day on 4 December 2024 in London, where financial targets for 2027 were disclosed. Tryg targets an insurance service result of between DKK 8.0bn
and DKK 8.4bn, a combined ratio around 81, a return on own funds of between 35% and 40% and total cumulative shareholder repatriation of between DKK 17bn and 18bn divided between an ordinary dividend range of DKK 15bn to 16bn and an extraordinary share buyback of DKK 2bn commenced on 4 December 2024 and concluded on 30 June 2025.
The Tryg share
The Tryg share is listed on the NASDAQ Copenhagen exchange. Company announcements and trading announcements are published in English - and in Danish on an optional basis. Interim reports and annual reports are published in English only.
The Tryg share started the year at a price of DKK 151.5 and ended 2025 at DKK 166.5. Total return (price and dividends) on the share was a positive 14.21%. The Tryg share came under pressure in the first part of the year, which was characterised by a flat share price and elevated volatility. From late spring, performance improved, supported by a more favourable inflation environment and the positive impact of profitability initiatives on financial results.
Tryg remains a defensive stock, with revenue relatively insulated from macroeconomic fluctuations and investment operations focused on low-risk assets. The business is considered stable and generates strong cash flows. Equity markets overall benefited from easing inflation and declining interest rates in 2025, though geopolitical uncertainty and trade tariffs continued to trigger occasional market shocks.
Share capital and ownership
Tryg's share capital totalled DKK 3,056,871,610 at 31 December 2025. There is one share class (611,374,322 shares with a nominal value of DKK 5), and all shares rank pari passu. The largest shareholder, TryghedsGruppen smba, owns 49.4%* of the shares and is the only shareholder holding more than 5% of the share capital. TryghedsGruppen supports peace of mind and healthcare activities in the Nordic region.
Quarterly dividends
Tryg started paying quarterly dividends in 2017. The Tryg share has a distinct income profile due to the business generally growing in line with GDP, thus producing high margins that are mostly returned to shareholders.
Insurance is one of the sectors offering the highest dividend yield. From an investment perspective, a quarterly dividend is a clear reminder of the high profitability of Tryg's business and the company's focus on returning capital to shareholders. Tryg's dividend policy is based on the following premises:
- an aspiration to distribute a steadily increasing dividend in nominal terms on a full-year basis.
- a general objective of creating long-term value for the company's shareholders.
- a competitive dividend policy compared to the policies of Tryg's Nordic competitors.
- annual distribution of 60-90% of operating earnings.
- the capital level must at all times reflect Tryg's targets for return on own funds and statutory capital requirements.
TryghedsGruppen
In 2025, and for the tenth year running, Tryg's largest shareholder, TryghedsGruppen, paid out DKK 1.1bn in member bonuses to Tryg's customers in Denmark, corresponding to 6% of the annual premiums paid in 2024. TryghedsGruppen owns 49.4%* of the shares in Tryg.
TrygFonden
TrygFonden is the leading and best-known peace-of-mind promoter in Denmark, supporting over 700 activities that contribute to creating peace of mind, such as coastal lifeguards, cuddle bears for children in hospital and defibrillators. TrygFonden contributes around DKK 775m annually to projects that create peace of mind in all parts of Denmark.
* Calculated excluding Tryg's own shares
{41}------------------------------------------------
• The capital level may be adjusted via extraordinary dividends or share buybacks
Annual general meeting
Tryg's annual general meeting will be held on 26 March 2026 at 15:00 CET. The notice will be advertised in the daily press in February 2025 and sent to shareholders upon request.
Update on Danish Ombudsman case
During the first quarter of 2026, Tryg is likely to receive a ruling from the Danish Supreme Court on a previous pricing practice in the Danish business-to-consumers segment in the period between 2016 and 2020. Tryg referred to this case in every quarterly report during 2025 and all annual reports since 2020. As previously stated, the case is deemed to have immaterial consequences for Tryg's equity and solvency position.

Shareholder distribution
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend | 5,024 | 4,844 | 4,734 | 4,118 | 2,802 |
| Dividend per share (DKK) | 8.2 | 7.8 | 7.4 | 6.29 | 4.28 |
| Payout ratio | 101 % | 101 % | 123 % | 183 % | 89 % |
| Extraordinary share buyback programme | 1,000 | 2,000 | 1,000 | 5,000 |
Financial calendar 2026
23 Jan. 2026 Tryg shares are traded ex-dividend
27 Jan. 2026 Payment of Q4 dividend
26 Mar. 2026 Annual general meeting
15 Apr. 2026 Interim report Q1
16 Apr. 2026 Tryg shares are traded ex-dividend
20 Apr. 2026 Payment of Q1 dividend*
10 July 2026 Interim report Q2 and H1
13 July 2026 Tryg shares are traded ex-dividend
15 July 2026 Payment of Q2 dividend*
09 Oct. 2026 Interim report Q1-Q3
12 Oct. 2026 Tryg shares are traded ex-dividend
14 Oct. 2026 Payment of Q3 dividend*
* Supervisory Board's approval required
{42}------------------------------------------------
Supervisory Board
Mette Osvold (1978)
Board member, Employee representative
Many years of experience from the insurance industry within business development, project management, change leadership and as Chair of
Torben Jensen (1967)
Board member
Competencies include highlevel corporate management, finance and risk management, governance, acquisitions and mergers, strategy and business development, and communication at many levels.
Thomas Hofman-Bang (1964)
Board member
CEO of the Danish Industry Foundation. Extensive global experience in the B2B environment and within the professional services industry in various roles as CEO, CFO, COB or NED for world class and market leading companies.
Jukka Pertola (1960)
Chair
More than 25 years of top management experience in the IT and telecommunication industry and electrical engineering, his latest position being CEO of Siemens Denmark from 2002 to 2017.
Anne Kaltoft (1961)
Board member
Many years' experience from top management positions within the Danish healthcare system and as Managing Director of the Danish Heart Foundation.
Elias Bakk (1975)
Board member, Employee representative
Product & Strategic Engagement Manager in Tryg Forsikring. Solid insurance knowledge from his years in the industry, business knowhow and judgement.
Charlotte Dietzer (1974)
Board member, Employee representative
Manager advisor in Claims Denmark, Tryg Forsikring. Has solid knowledge and experience of the insurance industry. Environmental, Social and Governance knowledge.
Tina Snejbjerg (1962)
Board member, Employee representative
Many years of experience, solid business know-how by working with management and HR-related issues in the financial sector, specifically the insurance industry.

Carl-Viggo Östlund (1955)
Board member
Solid background from the insurance industry, non-life as well as life. Business know-how and judgement, banking and finance know-how, understanding of digitalisation and risk management, ESG.
Lena Darin (1961)
Board member, Employee representative
Since 1989, Lena Darin has worked as a claims handler in the insurance industry. Solid knowledge and experience of the insurance industry.
Benedicte Bakke Agerup (1964)
Board member
CFO and senior management positions in complex and large organisations. Has worked extensively with capital and risk management and has in-depth understanding of the financial services sector.
Jonas Bjørn Jensen (1986)
Board member
Board experience from By & Havn I/ S, Metroselskabet, Vestforbrænding, and other large public companies within infrastructure and development, political leadership from the City of Copenhagen with a seat on the finance committee.
Mengmeng Du (1980)
Board member
Thorough knowledge of the Tech startup space as well as international experience from leading positions within Marketing and Operations at Spotify and COO at Acast.
Jørn Rise Andersen (1956)
Board member
Union Chairman of the Danish Customs and Tax Union. Many years of experience from top management positions in Danish trade unions as well as board seats in financial companies.
Steffen Kragh (1964)
Deputy Chair
24 years' experience heading an international company with 6,000 employees within the consumer space where technology, data, subscription, and user experience are key elements.
{43}------------------------------------------------
Supervisory Board
Jukka Pertolaa)
Born in 1960. Joined the Supervisory Board in 2017. Finnish citizen.
Career Professional board member. Former CEO of Siemens Denmark
Education MSc in Electrical Engineering
Board seats, Chair Tryg A/S and Tryg Forsikring A/S, Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy A/S, COWI Holding A/S, GN Store Nord A/S
Committee memberships Remuneration Committee (Chair), Nomination Committee (Chair) and IT Data Committee in Tryg A/S, Nomination and Remuneration Committee in COWI Holding A/S (Chair), Remuneration Committee, Nomination Committee and Technology & Innovation Committee (Chair) in GN Store Nord A/S
Experience More than 25 years of top management experience in the IT and telecommunication industry and electrical engineering. His latest position being CEO of Siemens Denmark from 2002 to 2017. Broad international experience with global and regional business responsibilities in both BtC and BtB
Competencies Solid technological background in telecommunication, IT, digitalisation, business models, strategy and business development. Understanding and experience of risk management, M&A, ESG, business know-how and judgement as well as insurance
Number of shares 13,000
Change in portfolio since the start of 2025 0
Steffen Kragha)
Born in 1964. Joined the Supervisory Board in 2023. Danish citizen.
Career President & CEO of Egmont Fonden and Egmont International Holding Group since 2001. Previously CEO of Egmont subsidiaries, employment in insurance and banking group Hafnia Holding A/S and stockbroker Erik Møllers Efterfølgere A/S
Education MSc in Economics and MBA Board seats, Chair Various Egmont companies Board seats, Deputy Chair Tryg A/S and Tryg Forsikring A/S, Nordic Bioscience Holding A/S Board member: Various Egmont companies
Committee memberships Remuneration Committee, Nomination Committee, Audit and Risk Committee in Tryg A/S
Experience 24 years' experience heading an international company with 6,000 employees within the consumer space where technology, data, subscription and user experience are key elements.
Former chair of Nykredit, including roles in Audit, Risk, Remuneration and Nomination Committees, and chair of Lundbeckfonden and Lundbeckfond Invest A/S
Competencies Experience within strategy, economics, finance and accounting, capital markets, securities and funding, legal and regulatory matters of importance to financial business, and corporate management including business development, data, technology and ESG
Number of shares 6,500 Change in portfolio since the start of 2025 0
Benedicte Bakke Agerupa)
Born in 1964. Joined the Supervisory Board in 2024. Norwegian citizen.
Career CEO of Laho AS, Procerta AS since 2018. Previously CFO of Wilh. Wilhelmsen ASA and CFO of KLP Insurance. Advisor and mentor for various startup companies
Education Degree in Economics and Business Administration ("siv.øk") from the Norwegian School of Economics ("NHH"), completed the Advanced Management Program at Harvard Business School.
Board seats, Chair Puregas AS, Laer & Co AS Board member Tryg A/S and Tryg Forsikring A/S, Altera Infrastructure GP L.L.C., Unifor, Søren Bulls Vei 25 Invest AS, Laboratoriebygg AS, KGJ Partnership IX AS and Inven2 AS
Committee memberships Audit Committee and Risk Committee in Tryg A/S, Chair Audit Committee of Altera Infrastructure GP L.L.C.
Experience CFO and senior management positions in complex and large organisations. Wealth and pension management experience and as a broad business executive. Previous directorships in several listed and unlisted companies within insurance, maritime, energy and renewables and finance
Competencies Has worked extensively with capital and risk management and has in-depth understanding of the financial services sector. Familiar with balance sheetdriven businesses and the regulatory implications that financial institutions are subject to. Business know-how includes strategy, restructuring, financial investments and communication, business development and governance Number of shares 1,500
Change in portfolio since the start of 2025 +1,500
Carl-Viggo Östlunda)
Born in 1955. Joined the Supervisory Board in 2015. Swedish citizen.
Career Former CEO of Swedish banks SBAB and Nordnet and the insurance company SalusAnsvar. At present entrepreneur, professional board member and investor
Education BSc in International Business and Finance & Accounting, Stockholm School of Economics
Board seats, Chair Coeli Finans AB, Fondo Solutions AB, Gladsheim Fastigheter AB, Ywonne Media Group Sweden AB, Juvinum Food & Beverage AB, Nedvi Fastigheter AB and Ponture AB
Board member Tryg A/S and Tryg Forsikring A/S, Allert Östlund AB, Delimport Ltd, Goobit Group AB including Goobit AB and Goobit Blocktech AB, Havsgaard AB, Wonderbox AB, Director Delimport Ltd and RiQuest Group AB
Committee memberships IT Data Committee (Chair) and Remuneration Committee in Tryg A/S
Substitute member Irisande Care Group AB
Experience More than 30 years as CEO and Managing Director in local and international environments in both listed and privately held companies as well as banks. Experience from the following industries: manufacturing, logistics, insurance, finance and banking
Competencies Solid background from the insurance industry, non-life as well as life. Business know-how and judgement, banking and finance know-how, understanding of digitalisation and risk management, ESG
Number of shares 4,787 Change in portfolio since the start of 2025 -3000
Thomas Hofman-Banga)
Born in 1964. Joined the Supervisory Board in 2022. Danish citizen.
Career CEO of the Danish Industry Foundation Education Certified Public Accountant
Board seats, Chair CBS Academic Housing, K Alternativ Private Equity 2019 K/S, K Alternativ Private Equity 2020 K/S, K Alternativ Private Equity 2021 K/S, K Alternativ Private Equity 2022 K/S, K Alternativ Private Equity 2023 K/S, K Alternativ Private Equity 2024 K/S, K Alternativ Private Equity 2025 K/S, K Alternativ Private Equity 2026 K/S, Half Double Institute fmba, Tranes Fond
Board member Tryg A/S, Tryg Forsikring A/S, Foreningen Roskildefestivalen, William Demant Fonden, William Demant Invest.
Committee memberships Audit Committee (Chair) and Risk Committee (Chair) in Tryg A/S
Experience Extensive global experience in the B2B environment and within the professional services industry in various roles as CEO, CFO, COB, non-executive director for world class and market-leading companies, including positions as CEO KPMG Denmark (5 years), President and Group CEO NKT (8 years) and Group CFO NKT (6 years) Competencies Key competencies include leadership, development and execution of ambitious growth strategies focused on value creation, performance culture, transparency, integrity, strong team performance. Extensively involved in development and dissemination of knowledge in sustainability.
Number of shares 12,233
Change in portfolio since the start of 2025 0
Group AB, Swappie Oy and Clas Ohlson AB
Mengmeng Dua)
Born in 1980. Joined the Supervisory Board in 2022. Swedish citizen.
Career Independent advisor to tech startups and professional board member. Former leading positions at Spotify and Acast
Education MSc in Economics and Business Administration from Stockholm School of Economics, MSc in Computer Science from Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) Board member Tryg A/S and Tryg Forsikring A/S, Dometic
{44}------------------------------------------------
Supervisory Board
Committee memberships IT Data Committee in Tryg A/S, People and Remuneration Committee in Swappie Oy Experience 10+ years of top management experience and as board member. Thorough knowledge of the Tech startup space as well as international experience from leading positions within Marketing and Operations at Spotify and COO at Acast. Extensive board experience from Retail, Life Insurance and Aviation. Member of Sweden's National Innovation Council
Competencies General top management experience from the Tech industry. Extensive experience in the areas of IT & digitalisation, transformation, marketing, organisation, strategy, business development and sustainability
Number of shares 3,000
Change in portfolio since the start of 2025 0
Torben Jensenb)
Born in 1967. Joined the Supervisory Board in 2025. Danish citizen.
Career CEO at SAGRO. CEO at SAGRO IT og Ejendomme A/S, SAGRO Time ApS and Director of SAGRO I/S Education Master of Science in Agriculture, E-MBA (change management), Reserve Officer, Executive board education, board education from the Forsikringsakademiet
Board seats, Chair LandboGruppen A/S, LandboGruppen Jysk ApS, ØkologiRådgivning Danmark ApS, Agro Re-Insurance S.A., Jysk IT ApS, Dalico P/S, SAGRO Finans & Formue A/S, Den Erhvervsdrivende Forening Agro Holding f.m.b.a. and Dalico Komplementarselskab ApS
Board member Tryg A/S and Tryg Forsikring A/S, DLBR P/ S (dansk Landbrugsrådgivning), DLBR Forsikringsmægler A/S, SAGRO IT og Ejendomme A/S and TryghedsGruppen smba
Experience Many years' experience as a top executive in advisory and industrial companies
Competencies High-level corporate management, finance and risk management, governance, acquisitions and mergers, strategy and business development, and communication at many levels
Number of shares 1,558
Change in portfolio since joining Supervisory Board in 2025 +312
Jonas Bjørn Jensenb)
Born in 1986. Joined the Supervisory Board in 2025. Danish citizen.
Career Unit Manager for Behaviour and Strategy in the Technical and Environmental Administration of the City of Copenhagen
Education Master of Science in Geography and Communications from University of Roskilde
Board member Tryg A/S and Tryg Forsikring A/S, TryghedsGruppen smba
Experience Board experience from By & Havn I/S, Metroselskabet, Vestforbrænding and other large public companies within infrastructure and development, as well as political leadership from the City of Copenhagen with a seat on the finance committee
Competencies Strategic leadership, business development, member involvement, societal development, personnel management, long-term financial management and risk management
Number of shares 0
Change in portfolio since joining Supervisory Board in 2025 0
Anne Kaltoftb)
Born in 1961. Joined the Supervisory Board in 2023. Danish citizen.
Career Former Managing Director of the Danish Heart Foundation.
Education MSc in Medicine, Medical Specialist in cardiology, PhD in cardiology, Master of Public Management. Pathfinder (a leadership development programme).
Board member Tryg A/S, Tryg Forsikring A/S, TryghedsGruppen smba
Committee memberships TrygFondens bevillingsudvalg Experience Many years' experience from top management positions within the Danish healthcare system and as Managing Director of the Danish Heart Foundation
Competencies Competencies within management, strategy and business development, communication and governance, optimisation of structure and processes,
financial management and social development within health
Number of shares 0
Change in portfolio since the start of 2025 0
Jørn Rise Andersenb)
Born in 1956. Joined the Supervisory Board in 2022. Danish citizen.
Career Union Chair of Dansk Told og Skatteforbund (the Danish Customs and Tax Union)
Education 3-year education in the Danish Customs Authorities. Various accounting courses (business diploma level), such as internal and external accountancy, organisation and tax law
Board seats, Chair Dansk Told og Skatteforbunds Fælleslegat, TryghedsGruppen SMBA
Board member Tryg A/S and Tryg Forsikring A/S, Lån og Spar Bank A/S, Fondet af 1844, Fagbevægelsens Hovedorganisation (the Trade Union Central Organisation), CO10 (The Central Organisation of 2010) and Forenede Gruppeliv
Committee memberships Remuneration Committee and Nomination Committee in Tryg A/S, Chair of the Audit Committee in Lån og Spar Bank A/S, member of the Risk Committee and Remuneration Committee in Lån og Spar Bank A/S
Experience Many years of experience from top management positions in Danish trade unions as well as board seats in financial companies
Competencies Understanding of the financial sector, finance and risk management, member loyalty and care, investments and capital management, political flair
Number of shares 0
Change in portfolio since the start of 2025 0
Charlotte Dietzerb)
Born in 1974. Joined the Supervisory Board in 2020. Danish citizen.
Employed since 1998
Career Manager advisor in Claims Denmark, Tryg Forsikring
Education Insurance education at Forsikringsakademiet (level 5) as well as various management and
communication training courses. Supervisory Board programme at Forsikringsakademiet
Board member Tryg A/S and Tryg Forsikring A/S Committee memberships IT Data Committee in Tryg A/S
Experience Division partner in Tryg A/S and examiner at Forsikringsakademiet
Competencies Solid knowledge and experience of the insurance industry. Excellent interpersonal and verbal communication skills. Environmental, Social and Governance knowledge
Number of shares 954
Change in portfolio since the start of 2025 +113
Tina Snejbjergb)
Born in 1962. Joined the Supervisory Board in 2010. Danish citizen.
Employed since 1987
Career Board member of Tryg A/S and Tryg Forsikring A/S
Education Insurance training Board member Tryg A/S and Tryg Forsikring A/S Committee memberships Risk and Remuneration
Committees in Tryg A/S Experience From 1987 to 2001, Tina Snejbjerg worked with insurance sales to both private and commercial customers as well as providing insurance advice to customers. From 2001-2009, Tina Snejbjerg was the Deputy Chair of the local branch of Forsikringsforbundet and since 2009 she has been the Chair, working with operations, strategy, negotiating agreements and engaged in recruiting and retaining members
Competencies Many years of experience mean Tina Snejbjerg has acquired solid business know-how and judgement, problem-solving abilities, and has worked with management and HR-related issues in the financial sector, specifically the insurance industry
Number of shares held 2,905
Change in portfolio since the start of 2025 +113
Elias Bakkb)
Born in 1975. Joined the Supervisory Board in 2017. Danish citizen.
Employed since 2006
{45}------------------------------------------------
Supervisory Board
Career Product & Strategic Engagement Manager in Tryg Forsikring
Education Norra Real Gymnasium, financial services & insurance at Företagsekonomiska Institut Stockholm. Programme at Forsikringsakademiet for new board members
Board member Tryg A/S and Tryg Forsikring A/S Committee memberships IT Data Committee in Tryg A/S Experience Team Manager in Moderna Affinity for 12 years, Business and Product development in Moderna and Trygg-Hansa Affinity for 7 years
Competencies Solid insurance knowledge from his years in the industry, business know-how and judgement, experience with organisation development, business development, customer handling and interaction
Number of shares 5,000 **Change in portfolio since the start of 2025 +**865
Mette Osvoldb)
Born in 1978. Joined the Supervisory Board in 2022. Norwegian citizen.
Employed since 2003
Career Chair of Finansforbundet in Tryg Education BSc in Business and Finance from Oxford Brookes University. Executive Board Programme "The Board as a Strategic Force", NHH Executive. Advanced training in board governance, strategic leadership, and value creation in complex organisations
Board member Tryg A/S and Tryg Forsikring A/S and Finansforbundet (Central)
Experience Many years of experience from the insurance industry within business development, project management, change leadership and as Chair of Finansforbundet in Tryg, with responsibility for strategic employee representation, organisational development and cooperation with executive management
Competencies Solid insurance knowledge, experience with strategy and business development, management, human resources, organisation, negotiations, processes, customer interaction and culture
Number of shares held 945
Change in portfolio since the start of 2025 +113
Lena Darinb)
Born in 1961. Joined the Supervisory Board in 2022. Swedish citizen.
Employed since 1989
Career Claims handler
Education Cand.jur/LLM
Board seats, Chair Chair of Akademikerföreningen of Trygg-Hansa since 2012
Board member Tryg A/S and Tryg Forsikring
Experience Since 1989, Lena Darin has worked as a claims handler in the insurance industry. Former Board Employee representative at Trygg-Hansa (2012-2015) Competencies Solid knowledge and experience of the
insurance industry Number of shares held 223
Change in portfolio the start of 2025 +113
Members of the Supervisory Board are elected for a term of one year. Employee representatives are, however, elected for a term of four years.
a) Independent member of the Supervisory Board as per the definition in Recommendations on Corporate Governance
| Committee meetings overview 2025 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| -- | -- | ---------------------------------- | -- |
| Name | SupervisoryBoard | AuditCommittee | RiskCommittee | NominationCommittee | RemunerationCommittee | IT DataCommittee |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jukka Pertola | 10/10 | 10/10 | 4/4 | 5/5 | ||
| Steffen Kragh | 10/10 | 6/6 | 6/6 | 10/10 | 4/4 | |
| Jørn Rise Andersen | 10/10 | 9/10 | 4/4 | |||
| Carl-Viggo Östlund | 10/10 | 4/4 | 5/5 | |||
| Thomas Hofman-Bang | 10/10 | 6/6 | 6/6 | |||
| Mengmeng Du | 10/10 | 5/5 | ||||
| Anne Kaltoft | 9/10 | |||||
| Benedicte Bakke Agerup | 10/10 | 6/6 | 6/6 | |||
| Torben Jensen a) | 8/10 | |||||
| Jonas Bjørn Jensen a) | 9/10 | |||||
| Charlotte Dietzer | 10/10 | 5/5 | ||||
| Tina Snejbjerg | 10/10 | 6/6 | 4/4 | |||
| Elias Bakk | 10/10 | 5/5 | ||||
| Mette Osvold | 10/10 | |||||
| Lena Darin | 10/10 |
a) Joined the Board 26 March 2025. Please note that 1 board meeting was held prior to 26 March 2025, and 9 were held after 26 March 2025.
b) Dependent member of the Supervisory Board
{46}------------------------------------------------

Lars Bonde (1965)
Group COO
Comprehensive experience from the insurance industry. Experienced in strategy, business development, digitalisation, innovation, legal and M&A. Management and leadership experience, including international experience.
Johan Kirstein Brammer (1976)
Group CEO
Has an international and strategic mindset developed from his time as a management consultant as well as a number of strategic roles across several industries. He couples this with a strong commercial sense and a desire to grow the business and improve the customer experience through innovation and digitalisation.
Allan Kragh Thaysen (1977)
Group CFO
Key competencies include management, accounting, tax, external and internal reporting, financial planning & analysis, reserving, risk management and capital modelling. He is a commercially oriented finance executive with a strong strategic, technical and commercial focus and understanding of the business.
Alexandra Bastkær Winther (1985)
Group CCO
Key competencies include experience in strategy development & execution, M&A and large-scale transformations. She has an innovative and commercial mindset with a continuous focus on identifying potential for further improvement.
Mikael Kärrsten (1975)
Group CTO
Key competencies include management, case underwriting, pricing, profitability, analytics, portfolio management and product development. Having spent two decades within insurance, he has the ability to simplify complex issues and generate results through proactive leadership.
{47}------------------------------------------------
Executive Board
Johan Kirstein Brammer Group CEO
Born in 1976. Joined Tryg in 2016.
Joined the Executive Board in 2018.
Education: LL.M., University of Copenhagen, MBA Australian Graduate School of Management, and Graduate Diploma (HD-Finance) Copenhagen Business School
Experience: Johan Kirstein Brammer has extensive top management experience from a range of industries. Prior to joining Tryg's Executive Board, Johan headed Tryg's Private Lines business in Denmark. Before joining Tryg, Johan held numerous executive roles with TDC before joining the company's Board as Head of Consumer and Group Chief Marketing Officer. Prior to this, Johan was with McKinsey & Co as a strategy consultant based in Australia and the UK. Before joining McKinsey & Co, Johan was an attorney with Kromann Reumert in Denmark. This range of experience has provided Johan with a broad, diverse toolbox, having held strategic and P&L responsibilities across multiple industries in an international setting.
Competencies: Johan Kirstein Brammer has an international and strategic mindset developed from his time as a management consultant as well as a number of strategic roles across several industries. He couples this with a strong commercial sense and a desire to grow the business and improve the customer experience through innovation and digitalisation. Johan has extensive experience within transformative M&A across borders and sectors
Number of shares held: 97,518 Number of shares held at the start of 2025: 91,131 Change in portfolio: +6,387
Allan Kragh Thaysen Group CFO
Born in 1977. Joined Tryg in 2018.
Joined the Executive Board in 2023.
Education: Graduate Diploma (HD/R) in Accounting and an MSc in Business Economics and Auditing (CMA) from Copenhagen Business School
Experience: Since May 2018, Allan Kragh Thaysen has been SVP of Group Finance in Tryg. Before then he held several positions in the Norwegian company Gjensidige from 2005 to 2018, where he became Financial Director for the Danish and Swedish operation of the business from 2010 to 2018. He started his career as an accountant at Deloitte from 1998 to 2005.
Allan Kragh Thaysen is deeply rooted in the insurance sector and has extensive experience from finance management within non-life insurance. He has for many years been in management positions within the core finance areas: accounting, tax, external and internal reporting, financial planning and analysis, reserving, risk management and capital modelling.
Throughout his career he has been part of several M&A transactions and integration cases, and he played a pivotal role for Tryg in the acquisition of RSA's Scandinavian businesses, Trygg-Hansa and Codan Norway.
Competencies: Allan Kragh Thaysen's key competencies include management, accounting, tax, external and internal reporting, FP&A, reserving, risk management and capital modelling. Allan Kragh Thaysen is a commercially oriented finance executive with a strong strategic, technical and commercial focus and understanding of the business.
Number of shares held: 13,748
Number of shares held at the start of 2025: 8,000
Change in portfolio: +5,748
Alexandra Bastkær Winther Group CCO
Born in 1985. Joined Tryg in 2020.
Joined the Executive Board in 2023.
Education: Mphil in Finance, University of Cambridge and MSc in Economics, University of Copenhagen
Board seats: Forsikring og Pension
Experience: Alexandra Bastkær Winther is an accomplished executive leader with experience spanning across multiple industries and geographies. At Tryg, Alexandra initially led the transformative acquisition of Trygg-Hansa and Codan NO. Subsequently, she headed up Alka Forsikring, acting as 'CEO'. Here, she was a board member of Alka Liv II and Alka Fordele. Prior to Tryg, Alexandra was with Boston Consulting Group (BCG) for
almost a decade, working as a management consultant across more than 20 countries and numerous industries before she specialised in Financial Institutions, M&A and Transformation. Prior to BCG, Alexandra was with J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. in London, where she worked in capital markets, focusing on equity derivates for institutional investors.
Competencies: Alexandra Bastkær Winther comes with deep experience in strategy development & execution, M&A and large-scale transformations. She has an innovative and commercial mindset with a continuous focus on identifying potential for further improvement. This is supported by a strong implementation capacity, focus on leadership & change management, ultimately driving better outcomes for customers and employees.
Number of shares held: 12,060 Number of shares held at the start of 2025: 7,111 Change in portfolio: +4,949
Lars Bonde Group COO
Born in 1965. Joined Tryg in 1998. Joined the Executive Board in 2006.
Education: Insurance training, LL.M., University of
Copenhagen
Board seats, Chair: P/F Betri Trygging, Forsikringsakademiet and F&P Arbejdsgiver
Experience: With more than 35 years' experience in the insurance industry, of which more than 15 years have been as a top executive, Lars Bonde has extensive industry knowledge. Throughout his tenure, he has held consecutive positions as leader and business-responsible for claims and all Tryg's business units, some of which were alongside his role as a member of the Executive Board. Lars Bonde has over 10 years of international experience from board positions.
Competencies: Comprehensive experience from the insurance industry. Experienced in strategy, business development, digitalisation, innovation, legal and M&A. Management and leadership experience, including international experience. Extensive board experience across several countries.
Number of shares held: 164,929
Number of shares held at the start of 2025: 159,616
Change in portfolio: +5,313
Mikael Kärrsten Group CTO
Born in 1975. Joined Tryg in 2022. Joined the Executive Board in 2023.
Education: Master in Business Economics Board seats, Chair: Tryg Livsforsikring A/S
Board member: Trafikförsäkringsföreningen Experience: Mikael Kärrsten has extensive experience from insurance management, particularly within the technical field, including portfolio management, case underwriting, pricing and product management. Over the past 20+ years he has held management positions within underwriting, both in commercial and personal lines. Before joining Tryg as part of the acquisition of Trygg-Hansa and Codan Norway in April 2022, he held positions as Underwriting Director for Trygg-Hansa (2016-2018) and Chief UW Officer for RSA Scandinavia (2018-2022). In RSA Scandinavia, Mikael was one of the key architects of the insurance technical excellence programme that gained RSA Scandinavia in general and Trygg-Hansa in particular a competitive edge through in-depth portfolio understanding and proactive action management. This experience was brought into Tryg when Mikael joined the company as PPU (price, product and underwriting) Director, and in 2023 Mikael joined the Executive Board of Tryg.
Competencies: Mikael Kärrsten's key competencies include management, case underwriting, pricing, profitability, analytics, portfolio management and product development.
Mikael Kärrsten is a commercially oriented, technical insurance executive with a strong strategic focus as well as focus on setting and achieving ambitious goals. Having spent two decades within insurance, he has an understanding of most insurance activities and has the ability to connect dots and simplify complex issues and generate results through proactive leadership.
Number of shares held: 7,870
Number of shares held at the start of 2025: 6,332
Change in portfolio: +1,538
{48}------------------------------------------------
Sustainability statement
- • ESG at a glance
- • 2025 progress on strategic targets
- General disclosures
- • Environment
- • Social
- • Governance
- • Data points deriving from other EU legislation
- • Independent auditor's limited assurance report on Sustainability statement

{49}------------------------------------------------
ESG at a glance
Tryg's sustainability efforts focus on climate adaptation and customer resilience, science-based emissions targets and reducing climate impact from claims handling – supported by a strong commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion.
Three strategic focus areas guide Tryg's efforts

Tryg is committed to protecting our customers from unforeseen events by helping to prevent damage.
Product categories Taxonomyaligned to help customers adapt to climate change and prevent damage.
Offering customers advice and inspiration for prevention measures including sending SMS alerts ahead of weather events.

Tryg is committed to mitigating the climate impact of its activities and those in its value chain.
Climate adaptation Science-based reduction targets Diversity, equity and inclusion
Tryg's CO2e emissions reduction targets are validated by the Science Based Targets initiative.
Repairing and reusing spare parts, partial repairs and restoring where possible.

Future-fit products Climate action Empowering people
Tryg wants to be an inclusive and diverse workplace where every employee can be their true self.
A key driver to unlock the full talent pool - among existing and potential employees.
Prevention Claims handling Internal resource groups
Employee-led resource groups for LGBTQ+, invisible disabilities and ethnic minorities to create awareness, understanding and inclusion.

{50}------------------------------------------------
2025 progress on strategic targets
| Targets | Progress | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 product categoriesaligned with the EU Taxonomy climate adaptation criteria by 2027 | 25 product categories Taxonomy-aligned | |||
| Future-fit products | 10%reduction in use of new material per claim by 2027 | 1.2 % reduction in use of new material per claim | ||
| 42%CO2e reduction in Scope 1 by 2030 | 15% reduction in Scope 1 emissions | |||
| 100%annual sourcing of renewable electricity in Scope 2 by 2030 | 100% use of renewable electricity | |||
| 40%of suppliers (by spend) have set SBTi targets by 2029 | 23% of suppliers have set targets | |||
| Climate action | 45.9%reduction in all-in use operational CO2e emissions from real estate covered bond portfolio by2030 | 20% CO2e reduction per m2 | ||
| 6%CO2e reduction per claim by 2027 | 9% CO2e reduction per claim | |||
| 100%of premiums from fossil fuel customers covered by green transition plans by 2027 | 86% of premiums covered by green transition plans | |||
| 41/59 at all management levels (female/male) | ||||
| Empowering people | Min 40/60gender representation at each management level by 2030 | 36/64 at director level (female/male) | ||
| 34/66 at top management level (female/male) |
Progress on target Progress below target
{51}------------------------------------------------
General disclosures
Sustainability & ESG are embedded in Tryg's 2027 strategy and governance, supporting Tryg's purpose 'As the world changes, we make it easier to be tryg1 - today and tomorrow.'
Strategy, business model and value chain
- • Strategy and targets
- Material impacts, risks and opportunities
- Stakeholder engagement
Governance
- Sustainability governance
- Due diligence
Basis for preparation
• Risk management and internal controls
Double materiality assessment Index of material disclosures

{52}------------------------------------------------
Business model and value chain
In its essence, insurance is about creating peace of mind. Peace of mind means that we are not alone with the consequences if our car is damaged, if we are burgled, or if a building burns to the ground.
Tryg's purpose, 'As the world changes, we make it easier to be tryg', underlines its commitment to being a proactive peace-of-mind creator for its customers by helping to protect their assets, health and belongings against the consequences of unforeseen events.
This implies a strong focus on providing relevant products and coverage, properly assessing and pricing insurance risks, and identifying relevant preventive measures while providing efficient claims handling.
The most visible delivery to customers is claims handling, making sure that customers' claims are handled in an efficient and satisfactory manner. Tryg works closely with suppliers across its network to ensure this while also pushing an agenda towards greater reuse of
materials and repairs in claims handling instead of replacements.
In addition to its core, insurance is also about being at the forefront and understanding the risks faced by customers and society. Most apparent right now is climate change, which is already causing significant disruption to society, to infrastructure and to people's personal lives as a result of more frequent and severe damage, particularly due to more water intrusion from the seas, the sky, rivers and the ground.
As an insurance company, Tryg aims to help customers adapt to climate change and to prevent claims from occurring in a world with increasingly severe weather. Tryg can help understand, price and prevent the impact of climate events – including those that are far in the future.
Tryg's purpose is also founded on a strong social heritage. Tryg's iconic lifebuoy, which hangs in more than 150,000 locations across Scandinavia, is a clear symbol of how Tryg strives to create security through preventive measures.
Via a number of partnerships, all with the purpose of preventing harm and damage, Tryg works to support the mental health of young people, ensure a safe and secure night life, and to educate school pupils about personal finances and insurance.
Tryg's value chain and material impacts, risks and opportunities
| Upstream | Own operations | Downstream | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reassurance Procurement Funds management | Products & Price & Sales & Service & Claims coverage underwriting marketing support management | Insurance coverage | ||
| E | Claims handling | Severe weather events | Prevention measuresHigh climate-impact sectors | |
| s | Cyber threatDiversity, equity & inclusionGender pay inequality | |||
| G | Supplier management |
Investments
Tryg primarily invests in a diversified portfolio of Nordic covered bonds and government bonds, including green bonds. These bonds are known for their stability and reliability and reinforce Tryg's low-risk approach to investments.
{53}------------------------------------------------
Sustainability strategy and targets
Sustainability & ESG is a key enabler across the three strategic pillars of Tryg's United 2027 strategy: Customer & Commercial Excellence, Scale & Simplicity, and Technical Excellence. Three strategic focus areas guide Tryg's targets and initiatives within sustainability & ESG as outlined below.
Future-fit products - Products adapted to the future weather

Tryg is committed to nudging and helping customers to prevent climate-related claims through proactive support and effective solutions.
By communicating and incentivising customers to implement preventive measures, Tryg helps both private and commercial customers safeguard their homes, buildings, belongings and assets from severe weather.
If a claim occurs, it often requires large amounts of materials to rebuild. Tryg is specifically targeting the amount of new materials used in the claims handling process to ensure a resource-efficient approach.
Targets:
- 30 product categories aligned with the EU Taxonomy, corresponding to approximately 60% of all product categories1 in scope for climate adaptation (2027)
- 10% reduction2 in use of new materials per claim (2027)
Climate action - CO2e reductions across the value chain

Tryg works actively with its defined climate targets to play its part in mitigating the climate impact of its business. Specific targets are validated by the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi), underlining Tryg's contribution to the Paris Agreement .
In addition to SBTi targets, Tryg continues to focus on reducing CO2e emissions from the claims handling process through its long-term focus on repairs and reuse of material.
For its downstream emissions, Tryg has defined a target for the purpose of engaging with high-climate impact customers on their green transitions.
Targets:
- 42% CO2e reduction2 in Scope 1 from company cars and natural gas (2030)
- 100% annual electricity consumption in scope 2 covered by renewable energy (2030)
- 40% of suppliers (by spend)2 have set SBTi targets (2029)
- 45.9% CO2e reduction2 per m2 across the real estate covered bond investment portfolio (2030).
- 6% CO2e reduction2 per claim (2027)
- 100% of premiums from fossil fuel customers covered by transition plans (2027)
Empowering people - Diversity, equity and inclusion

Creating peace of mind in a changing world requires passionate people with diverse skills across the entire organisation. Diversity, equity and inclusion are key drivers to unlocking the full talent pool, both among existing and potential employees.
Tryg builds on a strong foundation of high employee engagement, a diverse and inclusive culture, and strong talent retention. This includes continuous efforts and initiatives to ensure that every employee can be 'tryg as they are'.
Target:
• Minimum 40/60 gender representation at each management level (2030)
Annual Report 2025 | Tryg A/S | 54 2 Relative to base year 2024.
1A product category is defined as one or more insurance products insuring the same object, e.g. a house. Tryg counts the number of product categories per country and business unit, meaning that, for instance, the product category "House/Villa" is counted three times because all three countries offer this insurance category.
{54}------------------------------------------------
Material impacts, risks and opportunities
The 2025 review of the double materiality assessment (DMA) has led to some changes in the material IROs, including the identification of two material risks. Tryg has removed its previously identified material positive impacts following available guidance.
The positive impacts were considered to be efforts of mitigation and where thus excluded.
Negative environmental impacts centre around claims handling, where material impacts are identified for both climate change and resource use. Customer-related impacts centre around
the products Tryg offers, the sectors it insures and the management and protection of data and IT systems. Impacts in its own operations centre around diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI).
The material IROs are closely linked to the strategic sustainability focus areas and targets defined under Tryg's 2027 strategy.
More details on governance and the initiatives in place to respond to these IROs are provided in the topical sections under Environment, Social and Governance.
| Standard and topic | IRO | Valuechain | Description | Time horizon | Page |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1 Climate change | Short Medium Long | ||||
| Climate change mitigation | 00 | Upstream | CO 2 e emissions from claims handling | 67 | |
| 00 | Downstream | Providing insurance to high climate-impact sectors | 67 | ||
| Climate change adaption | 8 | Own operations | Severe weather events | 67 | |
| 0 | Own operations | Prevention measures | 67 | ||
| E5 Resource use and circular economy | |||||
| Resources inflows, incl. resource use | 00 | Upstream | Material use in claims handling | 81 | |
| S1 Own workforce | |||||
| Gender equality and equal pay for work of equal value | 00 | Own operations | Gender pay inequality | 95 | |
| Diversity | 00 | Own operations | Fostering and enabling diversity, equity and inclusion | 95 | |
| Consumers and end-users | |||||
| Privacy | 00 | Downstream | Data protection | 105 | |
| Information-related impacts for consumers and/or end-users | ß | Own operations | Cyber threat | 105 | |
| Access to products | 0 | Downstream | Insurance responding to societal risks | 105 | |
| G1 Business conduct | |||||
| Management of relationships with suppliers including payment practices | 00 | Upstream | Social and environmental requirements to suppliers | 112 | |
| Corruption and bribery | 00 | Own operations | Economic crime e.g. corruption and bribery | 112 |
{55}------------------------------------------------
Double materiality assessment
The double materiality assessment (DMA) was reviewed and updated during the year based on insights and experience gathered from year one reporting under the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS). Particular attention was paid to reassessing positive impacts and risks to ensure that the assessment follows the new guidance available.
The review has led to alterations but no significant change to the areas of focus.
Identification of impacts, risks and opportunities
Impacts, risks and opportunities were identified across Tryg's upstream and downstream value chain and in its own operations. In the upstream value chain, focus has been on claims suppliers, primarily motor and building, which are the two largest groups of claims. Downstream, focus has been on the most climate-intensive sectors.
Each pre-defined ESRS topic, sub-topic and subsub topic was considered in terms of potential and actual positive or negative impacts as well as financial risks and opportunities.
When reassessing impacts, risks and opportunities, initial suggestions for alterations were based on internal subject matter insights gathered from a more thorough understanding of the ESRS standards, from publicly available benchmarks and analyses of CSRD reports and from insights from an internal peer analysis.
For specific areas, the reassessment was supported by internal interviews of relevant areas and insights from due diligence processes such as supplier screenings and engagement surveys.
Internal proxies provided insights on specific areas relevant for e.g. investors, suppliers or customers.
Assessing impact materiality
Each identified impact was assessed according to severity (scale, scope and irremediability). Potential impacts were also considered in terms of likelihood. Reviews were performed in iterations to ensure that the final result was complete.
For impacts on people, a separate human rights review was performed to ensure that no potential impacts on human rights scored above the materiality threshold for severity.
Two impacts related to the topical standard 'Own workforce' (gender pay gap and diversity) did not meet the impact threshold of 3 (out of 4). Yet, as part of a final completeness review it was considered that these two are nevertheless material due to both their strategic importance to Tryg and to current societal and regulatory attention.
Assessing financial materiality
Risks and opportunities were assessed in terms of their potential effect on, respectively, cash flow, development, performance, position, cost of capital and access to finance. The potential financial effects were assessed in close collaboration with key stakeholders from finance and risk management and based on various sources of input, such as financial
targets and performance, existing risk management framework, estimates and assumptions.
Sustainability-related risks are not considered on a stand-alone basis. Rather, they are viewed as part of the company's overall risk taxonomy and are considered in the established ongoing risk management processes, including the defined thresholds for risk appetite in relevant areas.
The financial materiality threshold was determined to be 9 (out of 12) and is aligned with the threshold for Tryg's risk management framework.
Approval
Once considered complete, the consolidated overview of material impacts, risks and opportunities was reviewed and approved by the Sustainability & ESG Board and finally by the Audit Committee, as the preparatory body for the Supervisory Board.
Thresholds and identification of material data points
Once completed, the result of the DMA was considered and mapped against the respective disclosure requirement and associated data points of the ESRS.
The conclusion of the assessment was mapped in the EFRAG's IG3 data point index to ensure explanation and documentation for which data points were in scope for reporting.
Resource use and circular economy
Impacts, risks and opportunities related to resource inflow focus on claims suppliers. The inflow of resources is considered at a consolidated level across suppliers. No screenings or consultations were conducted and the assessment was based on existing knowledge, as it has been a strategic target for Tryg in recent years.
Pollution, water and marine resources, and biodiversity
For the purpose of identifying material impacts, risks and opportunities for the thematic ESRS standards on pollution, the assessment has focused on Tryg's claims suppliers. For water and marine resources, only Tryg's own activities have been assessed. For biodiversity, actual and potential impacts are identified and assessed across Tryg's upstream and downstream value chain. Due to the nature of the insurance business, no dependencies, transitional or physical risks are identified with regards to biodiversity. One systemic risk related to customers' impact on biodiversity is identified but not assessed material for Tryg at this point in time. No consultations have been conducted on these topics.
Business conduct
Business conduct is considered across Tryg's own operations, as such criteria are defined as the insurance sector in the Nordic region.
{56}------------------------------------------------
Stakeholder engagement
Tryg engages with its key stakeholder groups across a number of channels and for different purposes. The table describes the nature, outcome and anchoring of the engagements.
| Stakeholders | Purpose of engagement | How we engage | Use of stakeholder input |
|---|---|---|---|
| Employees | Attract and retain employees. Ensuring thatemployees can perform and thrive. | •Annual and bi-annual employee engagement andpulse surveys•Annual DEI survey•Survey of physical workspace•Work committees•One-on-one performance dialogues•Development plan and training | Feedback from engagement survey and pulse are analysed and, if relevant, further actions aredefined as part of the ongoing focus on creating an attractive workplace covering themessuch as general working conditions, leadership and management, training & development,and DEI.Examples: Employee engagement survey, DEI survey and internal focus on employeewellbeing. |
| Customers | Protect customers from unforeseen events anddamage through relevant products, proper riskassessment and guidance, and efficient claimshandling. Ensure transparent and efficient claimshandling. | •Regular customer and partner interaction•Customer service•Newsletters, including advice on prevention•Risk assessments and mitigation advisory•Complaints handling•Customer satisfaction surveys | Informs general customer communication, advisory and product development, and claimshandling processes. Delivering greater value to customers is the centric focus point of the2027 strategy.Example: Partnerships to help customers prevent climate-related damage to house andbuildings. |
| Society at large Insurance plays a crucial role in society as afinancial safety net, protecting private andcommercial customers against the consequencesof unforeseen events. | •Communication through social and established media•Dialogue with local trade associations in Denmark,Norway and Sweden•Dialogue with the Financial Supervisory Authoritiesand other supervisory authorities•Partnerships•Ownership: TryghedsGruppen and TrygFonden | Provides insights into the general expectations that society and customers have of the role ofinsurance in society. Can directly inform new product areas of focus, areas of improvement,new market opportunities, etc.Example: Advocating for collective action towards climate adaptation. | |
| Suppliers | Manage supplier relations based on decent socialand environmental performance while pushing formore repairs and use of reused material in claimshandling. | •Supplier relations management•Supplier self-assessment questionnaires•Supplier workshops | Enables insight into supplier-specific performance and areas of improvement. Can alsohighlight trends that are necessary for Tryg to act on.Example: Industry standard for ESG questionnaire for auto repair shops. |
| Owners andInvestors | Be transparent and provide insights into thefinancial and non-financial performance of Tryg. | •Quarterly and annual reports•Investor roadshows, conferences and meetings•Annual general meeting | Managing and meeting owners' and investors' expectations. Underlining Tryg's position as astable equity.Examples: Investor feedback and ESG ratings. |
{57}------------------------------------------------
Sustainability governance
Supervisory Board
Responsibility for ESG and sustainability is anchored with Tryg's Supervisory Board, who oversees the Group's strategy, including the enablers: People, Data, IT and Sustainability & ESG.
The Supervisory Board receives a quarterly status update on the strategic sustainability & ESG targets and on performance against the defined thresholds for risk appetite related to sustainability themes.
Four board committees are responsible for ESGrelated aspects, as reflected in the committee charters:
The Audit committee oversees the annual report, including external ESG reporting, data quality, internal controls and the annual double materiality assessment.
The Risk committee monitors the Group's risk and emerging risk profile, including risk appetite.
The Nomination committee is responsible for ensuring that Supervisory Board members have adequate collective knowledge, professional competencies and experience, also with regard to ESG-related aspects.
The Remuneration committee reviews and approves the variable salary programme of the Executive Board, including the specific ESG targets.
Executive Board
At the Executive level, Tryg has a dedicated Sustainability & ESG Board, chaired by Tryg's COO and composed of Senior Executives representing the business and central functions.
At quarterly meetings, the Sustainability & ESG Board oversees performance on the strategic ESG targets, including targets for climate, suppliers, climate-adapted products, material use in claims handling and gender diversity.
The composition of the Sustainability & ESG Board is designed to leverage relevant knowledge and decision-making across the organisation. In 2025, this board has paid particular attention to implementing the strategic sustainability focus areas of Tryg's 2027 strategy, including climate-adapted products, geopolitical developments and climate adaptation and mitigation efforts.
In 2025, a Geopolitical task force was established so Tryg could monitor, predict and act upon the impact of the turbulent geopolitical environment. A steering group composed of senior executives oversees the work of the task force. The recommendations of the task force are processed and discussed by the Risk committee.
The Compliance Board and Executive Board's Risk committee further discuss relevant ESG themes as appropriate, such as compliance with upcoming regulation or risk appetite.
Sustainability oversight


GOV-1
{58}------------------------------------------------
Remuneration
Integration of sustainability-related performance into incentive schemes
Tryg has incentive programmes for the Executive Board, Executive Leader Forum and other leaders based on their organisational level.
Tryg's management incentive programmes are designed to mobilise management around shared targets that reward performance in a way that is commensurate with shareholder interests, consistent with the nature of the industry, promotes collaborative engagement and performance, and which can lead to increased talent attraction through marketaligned structures.
Specifically for the Executive Board, Sustainability & ESG targets constituted 20% of the variable salary for the short-term incentive scheme (STI) in 2025.
The ESG targets cover targets for CO2e emission reductions from Tryg's own operations, CO2e emission reductions for claims, gender balance in management and level of employee engagement. The weight of the respective ESG targets is not publicly disclosed. Performance is based on specific milestones and thresholds within each of the categories. The specific targets for the STI are approved annually by the Supervisory Board.
The two climate targets are also included in the annual employee bonus scheme.
Read more in Tryg's Remuneration Report 2025 (Link)

{59}------------------------------------------------
Due diligence
Human rights statement
At Tryg, we are committed to respecting all fundamental human rights and decent working conditions, and will comply with any applicable laws and regulations, including internationally recognised conventions, on the protection of fundamental human rights and decent working conditions.
Fundamental human rights refer to internationally recognised human rights that follow from, among other sources, the UN Convention on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights from 1966, the UN Convention on Civil and Political Rights from 1966, and the ILO's core conventions on fundamental rights and principles in working life.
Tryg's Human and Labour Rights policy describes its commitment to respecting the human and labour rights of own employees, suppliers and customers. See description of content under the sections Own workforce, Consumers and end-users, and Business conduct.
Human and labour rights policy (Link)
Tryg recognises that it can potentially cause, contribute or be linked to adverse impacts on human and labour rights in its own operations, through its products and services, customers and business relations, and in the supply chain.
Tryg supports the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, which means that it continuously seeks to identify, prevent and mitigate risks of adverse impacts on human and labour rights both internally in the organisation and across the value chain.
This is done through various channels and initiatives, such as the annual and bi-annual employee engagement surveys, supplier questionnaires and the continuous monitoring of claims decisions and complaints.
Tryg Norway is subject to the Norwegian Transparency Act. Read more on page 122.
| Core elements of due diligence | Sections in the Sustainability Statement |
|---|---|
| Embedding due diligence in governance,strategy and business model | •Strategy and business model, p. 53 - 54•Sustainability governance, p. 58 |
| Engaging with affected stakeholders in all keysteps of the due diligence | •Stakeholder engagement, p. 57•Employee engagement survey, p. 96•Customer engagement, p. 108•Supplier screenings, p. 115 - 116 |
| Identifying and assessing adverse impacts | •Employee engagement survey and communicationcommittees, p. 96•Supplier screenings, p. 115 - 116•Corruption and bribery risk assessment, p. 113 - 114 |
| Tracking the effectiveness of these effortsand communicating | •Employee engagement survey process, p. 96•Supplier screenings, p. 115 - 116 |
{60}------------------------------------------------
Basis for preparation
The Sustainability Statement represents Tryg's statutory Sustainability Statement in accordance with the EU's Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the associated European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS)1.
Furthermore, Tryg has followed the implementation guidance provided by the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), while the quantitative ESRS data points in the report are referenced using the specific ESRS ID numbers in accordance with EFRAG's 'Implementation Guide 3: List of ESRS Data Points (IG-3)2.
The statement also covers Tryg's statutory reporting on the Danish Gender Balance Act (Act No. 1602 of 17/12/2024). Finally, the report comprises information for communicating on progress to the UN Global Compact and thus underlines Tryg's ongoing commitment to the Ten Principles on human and labour rights, environment and anti-corruption.
Tryg's Sustainability Statement only includes ESRS data points identified as material under the double materiality assessment (DMA) and mandatory under the ESRS framework. Voluntary data points under the ESRS are not included in the statement. All data points in the Sustainability Statement are subject to limited assurance.
The index on page 63 lists the material disclosures and their respective location in the report. Where relevant, 'Incorporation by reference' is applied to ensure integration across the annual report. This is marked in the
index, and the relevant specific data points are clearly marked in the text.
References to other EU legislation as defined by ESRS 2 Appendix B is available on page 117.
Targets
Targets are presented under the respective topical sections. For the sections on 'climate change' and 'own workforce' the overview shows both strategic and foundational targets. Foundational targets refer to essential objectives that ensure compliance and operational integrity at Tryg.
Scope and consolidation
The Sustainability Statement covers Tryg's upstream and downstream value chain. See further details in the sections: 'Business model and value chain' and 'Material impacts, risks and opportunities' on pages 53 and 55.
The scope of the Sustainability Statement is aligned with Tryg's consolidated financial statements and covers all operations within the Tryg Group and its subsidiaries (see Group chart on page 212). The only change compared to 2024 is that Tryg Trade is now included in all figures. This adjustment ensures completeness and has no material impact on the data, as Tryg Trade represents less than 1% of total profit/ loss. Any other scope deviations are described in the accounting policies under the relevant indicators.
ESG data is collected and consolidated per legal entity and activity on a line-by-line basis. The ESG data follows the same consolidation principles as financial reporting and includes
assets that are financially owned and operated. Assets that are leased under long-term agreements are treated as capital assets, according to IFRS 16.
The time horizons used follow the financial reporting period, aligned with the fiscal year from 1 January 2025 to 31 December 2025, and are consistent with the double materiality assessment. Short-term is defined as one year, medium-term as up to five years, and long-term as more than five years.
Comparative figures are presented for metrics disclosed in one prior reporting period (2024), which marks the first year in which definitions and scope were aligned with the ESRS and serves as the baseline for target setting.
Estimation and uncertainty
Tryg aims to disclose data as correctly and accurately as possible by using primary measurement data and by standardising the calculation of emissions using emission factors from Tryg's carbon accounting system.
Tryg relies on the following key methods of measurement aligned with the recommendations of the GHG protocol: 1) Spend-based, 2) Activity-based or 3) Hybrid.
Tryg does not use any indirect data sources, such as industry benchmarks, judgment-based estimates or sector averages, in order to minimise potential uncertainties in data calculations.
Tryg applies estimates in its reporting on selected data points due to fast close procedures and reliance on supplier-provided data. A defined process for risk assessment and mitigation controls is in place, including defined thresholds for when to adjust. These processes ensure that any potential impact on data accuracy is minimal.
If measurement uncertainty arises from assumptions or estimates, it is explained in the accounting policies for each disclosure.
| PotentialUse of estimates and potential uncertaintiesuncertainty | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Key accounting estimatesimpact | |||||
| ESRS ID | |||||
| E1-6 | Scope 1–3 – Internaloperations: Consumptiondata from Tryg's locations | Tryg's fast-close process required using estimates forparts of Q4 2025, since invoice-based data was not yetaccessible when reporting. Locations under 750 m2 arebased on estimations. Mitigation controls in Q1. | Low | ||
| E1-6 | Scope 3-C1. Purchasedgoods and services | Tryg's fast-close process required using estimates forparts of Q4 2025, since invoice-based data was not yetaccessible when reporting. Mitigation controls in Q1. | Low | ||
| E5-4 | Resource inflows | Tryg's fast-close process required using estimates forparts of Q4 2025, since invoice-based data was not yetaccessible when reporting. Mitigation controls in Q1. | Low |
1 Commission delegated regulation (EU) of 2023/2772 of 31 July 2023.
2 EFRAG IG 3 List of ESRS Data Points, May 2024.
{61}------------------------------------------------
Changes in preparation or presentation of sustainability information
Materiality thresholds have been defined for restating quantitative information in cases of changes in reporting or reporting deviations. Procedures have been established for how restatements should be carried out, including those related to changes or deviations in prior reporting periods. If data has been restated, this will be clearly disclosed under the specific disclosure point.
As part of Tryg's ongoing efforts to ensure that disclosures reflect material topics identified through the DMA, and since 'waste' has not
GOV-5
been assessed as a material topic, the E5-5 data table on resource outflows has been removed from the Sustainability Statement. Waste management remains an operational priority for Tryg, with targets set for both 2027 and 2030. Progress will continue to be monitored internally. Total $CO_2$ e emissions associated with waste under Scope 3, Category 5, will still be included in the report to ensure transparency on climate-related impacts.
Diff. from Restatements due to revised data 2024 Units Reasons for restatement baseline ESRS ID Baseline restatement due to multiple factors such as updated methodology, improved data Scope 3-C1. Purchased completeness, adjustments for currency and tCO2e -93.083 goods and services inflation effects, and updates to category definitions. The baseline has been restated due to a methodological update, with calculations now E1-6 11 Scope 3-C2. Capital goods based on Tryg's finance asset register and tCO2e recorded assets, thereby aligning calculations with financial depreciation. The baseline has been restated to reflect changes E1-6 11 Scope 3-C15. Investments in the underlying assets, driven by a shift towards tCO2e -73,351 more energy-efficient assets within ship credits. The baseline has been revised following the Share of Scope 2 covered 36 identification of a calculation discrepancy in % point by contractual instruments 2024 Total weight of products, E5-4 02 technical and biological 102 Tonnes The transition from spend-based to activitymaterials used based calculation methodologies in 2025 necessitated the restatement of the 2024 Total weight of secondary baseline. reused or recycled Tonnes 30 components including packaging
Risk management and internal controls
Scope, main features and components
Risk assessments are integrated into Tryg's data collection process to prevent misleading information, statements, figures or conclusions based on inaccurate or incomplete data.
Risks are identified as incidents that can have an impact on the audit objectives: Completeness, accuracy and consistency from ESRS 1, Appendix B: 'Qualitative characteristics of information'. Risks are identified in the data collection process for the specific data points and described in relation to the audit objectives together with relevant mitigation actions.
Main risks identified, mitigation strategies and related controls
The risk assessment methodology for the Sustainability Statement identifies where material misstatements are likely to arise in the data collection process. A risk mapping and assessment has been performed for all main data points. Mitigation actions and quality controls are described per identified risk.
Tryg's mitigation strategy aims to establish a control environment based on robust preventive controls – as opposed to corrective or detective controls – in order to be able to identify risks as early as possible in the data collection process. Both manual and automated controls are in place and, going forward, Tryg will work to automate as many controls as possible.
Financial statements
The risk control activities are performed in connection with periodical internal or external reporting. Audits are performed by both internal and external auditors, which is in line with the process of the financial audit. The results of the limited assurance process, including potential observations or identified risks, are reported to the Audit committee through periodic reporting of key findings. As the preparatory body for Tryg's Supervisory Board on matters related to ESG reporting, the Audit committee is responsible for monitoring and assessing the risk management systems established for the financial and ESG reporting process.
Annual Report 2025 | Tryg A/S | 62
{62}------------------------------------------------
Index of material disclosures
| ESRS standard | DR | Description | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| BP-1 | General basis for preparation of Sustainability statement | 61 - 62 | |
| BP-2 | Disclosures in relation to specific circumstances | 61 - 62 | |
| GOV-1 | The role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies | 33 - 341;58 | |
| GOV-2 | Information provided to and sustainability matters addressed by the undertaking's administrative, management and supervisorybodies | 58 | |
| GOV-3 | Integration of sustainability-related performance in incentive schemes | 59 | |
| ESRS 2 | GOV-4 | Statement on due diligence | 60 |
| GOV-5 | Risk management and internal controls over sustainability reporting | 62 | |
| SBM-1 | Strategy, business model and value chain | 6; 22; 17; 1002; 53 - 54 | |
| SBM-2 | Interests and view of stakeholders | 57 | |
| SBM-3 | Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model | 55; 67; 81; 95; 105; 112 | |
| IRO-1 | Description of the process to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities | 56 | |
| IRO-2 | Disclosure requirements in ESRS covered by the undertaking's sustainability statement | 56; 63 - 64; 117 - 119 | |
| E1-1 Transition plan climate change mitigation | 68 | ||
| E1-2 | Policies related to climate change mitigation and adaptation | 69 | |
| E1 | E1-3 | Actions and resources in relation to climate change policies | 69 - 71 |
| E1-4 | Targets related to climate change mitigation and adaptation | 75 | |
| E1-5 | Energy consumption | 78 | |
| E1-6 | Gross Scopes 1, 2, 3 and Total GHG emissions | 77 | |
| E5-1 | Policies related to resource use and circular economy | 81 | |
| E5 | E5-2 | Actions and resources related to resource use and circular economy | 81 - 82 |
| E5-3 | Targets related to resource use and circular economy | 82 | |
| E5-4 | Resource inflows | 83 | |
| S1-1 | Policies related to own workforce | 96 | |
| S1 | S1-2 | Process for engaging with own workforce and workers' representatives about impacts | 96 |
| S1-3 | Process to remediate negative impacts and channels for own workforce to raise concerns | 96 |
{63}------------------------------------------------
| ESRS standard | DR | Description | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| S1-4 | Taking action on material impacts on own workforce and approaches to managing material risks and pursuing materialopportunities related to own workforce, and effectiveness of those actions | 97 - 99 | |
| S1-5 | Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts and managing material risks and opportunities | 99 | |
| S1-6 | Characteristics of the undertaking's employees | 100 - 101 | |
| S1-7 | Characteristics of non-employees in the undertaking's own workforce | 100 | |
| S1 | S1-8 | Collective bargaining coverage and social dialogue | 101 |
| S1-9 | Diversity metrics | 102 | |
| S1-13 | Training and skills | 103 | |
| S1-16 | Remuneration metrics (pay gap and total remuneration) | 104 | |
| S1-17 | Incidents, complaints and severe human rights impacts | 104 | |
| S4-1 | Policies related to consumers and end-users | 106; 108 | |
| S4-2 | Process for engaging with consumers and end-users about impacts | 108 | |
| S4 | S4-3 | Process to remediate negative impacts and channels for consumers and end-users to raise concerns | 108 |
| S4-4 | Taking action on material impacts on consumers and end-users, and approaches to managing material risks and pursuing materialopportunities related to consumers and end-users, and effectiveness of those actions | 106 - 107; 108 | |
| S4-5 | Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and opportunities | 109 | |
| G1-1 | Corporate culture and business conduct policies | 113 - 114 | |
| G1 | G1-2 | Management of relationships with suppliers | 115 - 116 |
| G1-3 | Prevention and detection of corruption and bribery | 113 |
{64}------------------------------------------------
Environment
Tryg maintains a dual strategic focus in its climate efforts. On the one hand, Tryg is committed to supporting customers in adapting to climate change and to prevent claims from happening. On the other, Tryg works actively to reduce its CO2e footprint across its business and value chain through validated climate targets.
Environmental highlights Climate change
- Climate transition plan
- SBTi-validated emission reduction targets
- CO2e reductions in claims handling
Resource use and circular economy
• Reducing use of new materials in claims handling
EU Taxonomy
• Products to help customers adapt to climate change

{65}------------------------------------------------
Environmental highlights
Helping customers adapt to climate change
25 product categories aligned with the EU Taxonomy, supporting customers in adapting to climate change and preventing climaterelated damage.
Over 450,000 preventive SMS alerts sent to customers
Ahead of forecasted storms and cloudbursts, Tryg sends targeted SMS alerts, providing house insurance customers with practical guidance to help prevent weather-related damage.
First products eco-labelled with Bra Miljöval
Trygg-Hansa's house, content and cabin products are the first products in Tryg to earn the Bra Miljöval ecolabel, a Type I ecolabel meeting Sweden's largest environmental organisation Naturskyddsföreningen's criteria.
SBTi-validated emission reduction targets
Tryg's climate emission reduction targets were validated by SBTi in 2025.
Campaign for a climateresilient future
Campaign launched to spotlight the need for national climate adaptation.
9% CO2e reduction per claim
By means of increased repairs and reuse of material and procurement cost savings.
{66}------------------------------------------------
Climate change
Material impacts, risks and opportunities
For the standard 'Climate change', four material IROs1 are identified: Two negative impacts, one risk and one opportunity.
Negative impacts
Claims handling
Claims handling is a resource-heavy process closely linked to the core of Tryg's insurance business. The climate impact of materials used to handle around 2 million claims annually is significant. Tryg has a long-term focus on collaborating with claims suppliers to build and expand practices for repairing instead of replacing and employing used materials instead of new. Tryg's policies and initiatives related to claims handling are described under E5.
Insuring high climate-impact sectors
Tryg's commercial customers span a range of sectors, some of which are already in the process of reducing their CO2e emissions, while others have not progressed that far yet. The negative repercussions of high climate-impact sectors, such as fossil fuel extractors and producers, are recognised and obvious. The role of insurance here is still being discussed and will presumably become clearer over the coming years. Regardless, Tryg has defined a target to ensure that companies active in the extraction and production of fossil fuels have green transition plans in place. Recognising its limitations, the target is a first step towards taking responsibility and pushing for change in its downstream value chain.
Risk
Severe weather events
The increasing frequency and severity of weather events impact claims patterns in terms of both number and size. Since 2020, the number of weather-related claims made by Tryg's customers has increased by 112%. Tryg leverages its technical expertise in pricing, reserving, claims forecasting, underwriting and reinsurance to mitigate the financial impact of the physical climate risk. Developing products for climate adaptation, including incentivebased prevention mechanisms, is a another means of reducing the impact of climate on Tryg's financial performance.
Opportunity
Prevention
Including preventive measures in product offerings is identified as a financial opportunity for Tryg and consequently central to its ambition of being a proactive peace-of-mind creator. Advising customers on how to prevent damage can positively impact the number and size of claims, thereby also limiting resource use and the associated emissions required to handle them.
Integrating preventive measures across product categories is a strategic focus area for Tryg. It is specifically addressed in connection with climate-adapted products as a means for helping customers protect themselves against severe weather events, as defined under the EU Taxonomy – one of Tryg's key strategic focus areas.

{67}------------------------------------------------
Transition plan for climate change
Slowing down and minimising the consequences of climate change is one of the greatest challenges of our time. Tryg's transition plan outlines the key targets and levers for mitigating the impact of its business activities and value chain. Progress on targets and emission levels are available on page 75 and 77.
The transition plan centres around Tryg's validated SBTi targets covering Scope 1, 2 and 3. The SBTi validation underpins Tryg's support for the goal of the Paris Agreement to limit global warming to 1.5oC. Additionally, to account for the emissions stemming from resource use in the claims handling processes,
Tryg has defined reduction targets for, respectively, the amount of materials used and the associated CO2e emissions. A specific target regarding customers active within the extraction and production of fossil fuels is a first step towards a more proactive approach for engaging with customers around their green transition.
For each target, clear governance and roadmaps are in place to ensure ownership and progress. Details about the specific action plans are described in the following sections. Tryg is not excluded from the EU Paris-aligned Benchmarks. The transition plan is approved by the Sustainability & ESG Board.
An integrated part of Tryg's 2027 strategy
The targets are an integral part of Tryg's 2027 strategy and of two of the three strategic sustainability focus areas - Future-fit products and Climate action.
For Tryg, climate adaptation is closely connected to climate mitigation actions. As the frequency and severity of weather events increases, so do the number and size of weather-related claims, and the larger the claim, the greater the climate footprint for handling it. As part of its transition plan, Tryg therefore also focuses on climate adaptation, in line with the criteria of the EU Taxonomy, in terms of helping customers protect their assets and buildings from changing weather through preventive
measures and text message alerts. The strategy therefore includes a specific target to align 30 product categories with the criteria for climate adaptation as defined by the EU Taxonomy.
Additionally, in 2025, Tryg has launched a national campaign in Denmark on climate adaptation with the overarching purpose of mobilising across sectors to shed light on and bring attention to the necessary collective efforts and political action that must be undertaken to protect citizens, companies and communities from climate change.
The decarbonisation levers are considered capable of reaching the targets. Each is in process and being continuously matured and integrated.
Climate transition plan



1) Target year 2030
2) Target year 2029
3) Target year 2027
{68}------------------------------------------------
Policies related to climate change mitigation and adaptation
Tryg's Climate and environmental policy guides its efforts to mitigate negative impacts. As an insurance company, direct emissions from offices and company cars constitute only a fraction of total emissions. The majority of emissions are indirect and stem from, for example, the claims handling process.
The policy also addresses climate change adaptation in terms of managing climate-related risks. The policy applies to all legal entities and business areas. It is owned by the Head of Sustainability & ESG.
Climate and environmental policy (Link)
ISO 14001 environmental management certification guides our efforts
Efforts to ensure protection of the climate and environment, including biodiversity, are driven by the certified environmental management system ISO 14001. In 2025, Tryg was recertified to the standard across all its locations in Denmark, Norway and Sweden. The environmental management system supports Tryg by ensuring continuous focus, planning, implementation, improvements and targets related to the environment and climate.
Eco-Lighthouse certification in Norway
Tryg Norway is also certified under the national Eco-Lighthouse certification scheme, which focuses on the environment and a safe working environment for employees.
Actions and resources in relation to climate change policies
Science-based targets and actions on targets
In 2025, Tryg's climate emission reduction targets were validated by the SBTi. The targets cover Tryg's Scope 1 and 2 emissions – focusing on reducing emissions from the company car fleet and energy and electricity use. Scope 3 targets address the largest bulk of Tryg's emissions, namely from its supply chain and investments. See more details about the specific targets on page 75.
Supply chain
To push for change across its supply chain, Tryg has defined a target that 40% of suppliers measured by spend should set science-based targets by the end of 2029. Acting on this, SBTi is now integrated into the ongoing dialogue and collaboration with suppliers. The approach is to embed SBTi as a core element of any ESG discussion with suppliers.
In 2025, an SBTi commitment requirement was incorporated into Tryg's contractual agreements and contract renewals, including an obligation for suppliers to maintain their commitment and actively work towards their targets throughout the duration of the contract. Recognising the limitations faced by smaller suppliers in terms of the contractual requirements, requiring the smallest suppliers to join SBTi is not considered realistic. Focus is therefore on the largest suppliers. The expectation is that, over time, Tryg will be able to motivate companies across its related industries to join SBTi.
To assess the maturity of potential and existing suppliers in relation to SBTi, relevant questions are included in the tender process as well as in Tryg's ESG supplier screening questionnaires.
Investments
To fulfil the goal of a stable, low-capitalconsuming investment profile, Tryg's investment portfolio consists primarily of Nordic covered bonds. Under SBTi, Tryg has committed to reducing all in-use operational GHG emissions from its real estate covered bond portfolio by 45.9% per m2 by 20301.
Tryg maintains a structured dialogue with issuers to understand and encourage efforts to reduce carbon footprints. Sustainability considerations are embedded in the investment process and, all else being equal, Tryg prioritises climate-conscious options, including green bonds.
Fossil fuel customers
As a first step towards taking responsibility for its underwritten emissions from the commercial customer portfolio, Tryg has defined a target that this specific group of customers should have green transition plans in place. Tryg has defined a process for engaging in dialogue with its customers who are active in the extraction and production of fossil fuels. An information package has been developed for the underwriters or sales team to use in their dialogues with customers or brokers. It should be noted that this sector constitutes only a small share of Tryg's commercial portfolio. Nonetheless, this is considered a first step towards addressing customer impacts.
Through continuous tracking and customer follow-ups, Tryg aims to engage the customers that still do not have transition plans in place and to urge them to accelerate their efforts.
Read about Tryg's efforts to reduce material use and emissions from its claims handling in the section 'Resource use and circular economy'.
Trygg-Hansa was granted Bra Miljöval license for house, contents and cabin products
Trygg-Hansa obtained the Bra Miljöval license for its house, contents and cabin insurance products in 2025. Bra Miljöval is an eco-label managed by Naturskyddsföreningen, Sweden's largest environmental organisation, and is recognised as one of the Nordics' most rigorous independent eco-labels.
The eco-label covers insurance products for houses, cabins, rental apartments and owneroccupied apartments. It is based on the international ISO 14024 standard for third-party environmental certifications. By choosing Bra Miljöval-labelled insurance, customers can make a conscious choice without compromising on coverage or service.
The eco-label confirms that Trygg-Hansa meets Naturskyddsföreningen's environmental requirements for claims prevention, claims handling prioritising repair over replacement where possible, and supplier engagement to integrate environmental considerations into their operations. It also requires Trygg-Hansa to minimise the environmental impact of its offices, including the use of electricity and heating, and to invest premiums prudently, excluding companies involved in fossil fuel extraction, production or distribution.
The eco-labelled products were launched in January 2026, benefiting approximately 600,000 existing customers.
{69}------------------------------------------------
Helping customers prevent damage
Helping customers and society prevent claims from happening is considered a central part of Tryg's delivery to its customers. Tryg aims to help and to nudge customers to take the necessary precautions to protect their assets and belongings against damage.
Tryg has a long-term focus on prevention and has a number of measures in place across products and markets. These types of initiatives can help prevent or minimise the damage caused by e.g. water or fire. This not only benefits Tryg, customers are also able to avoid a potential loss or damage. Fewer and smaller claims will, all things being equal, also lead to a reduction in the amount of resources needed to handle the claim.
In light of another year marked by severe weather events with both human and economic consequences, there is an indisputable need to proactively ensure that adequate prevention measures are in place - at a private, commercial and societal level - in order to be prepared for the severe weather events that must be expected to continue to occur in the future. Customers are seeking advice and concrete solutions to how they can, for example, protect their homes and buildings against flooding. Tryg's insights on claims, weather patterns and risks enables Tryg to guide its customers towards the most efficient measures for prevention.
Each business area in Tryg has launched initiatives to encourage customers to take preventive measures. For products aligned with the criteria for climate adaptation under the EU Taxonomy, this includes an incentive-based approach, where customers with, for example, housing or building insurance obtain discounted premiums or zero excess if they install a
backflow prevention valve. Commercial customers in Denmark also have the opportunity to buy dedicated climate coverage that offers additional claims compensation for climate-related preventive measures that can help avoid repeated claims.
Central to reaping the benefits of preventive measures is that these are also activated by customers. In 2025, Tryg established a baseline for the proportion of private house insurance customers across Denmark, Norway and Sweden, who have implemented measures to prevent climate- and weather-related claims. The baseline enables better tracking of the impact of Tryg's customer advice and the effectiveness of these measures.
Targeted SMS weather alters to customers
To help prevent damage, Tryg proactively warns customers ahead of severe weather events such as cloudbursts or storms. Through data partnerships with local suppliers, Tryg receives alerts when forecasts predict extreme weather events and immediately informs affected customers via SMS. These messages include practical advice on how to protect their property and belongings. The alerts are highly targeted, focusing on customers in areas most at risk for the specific event.
In 2025, more than 450,000 text message alerts were sent to private customers in Denmark, Norway and Sweden. In a follow-up survey on the text message alerts sent to private customers in Denmark, two-thirds answered that they acted on the advice to prevent damage from a forecasted storm. The benefits are mutual, as Tryg sees great potential in these proactive customer engagements in terms of claims costs, customer retention and customer satisfaction.
Examples of preventive measures

Protect assets against weather
In Norway, financial incentives are in place to encourage customers to protect their assets against winter weather by e.g. storing their boat or vehicles inside, or installing a heat pump in vacation homes to prevent pipe bursts caused by freezing temperatures.

'Secured & Insured'
Through a unique collaboration with Avarn, Trygg-Hansa offers its customers a security package that contributes to increased business continuity by shortening interruption time and improving damage management for the customer.

Hotline for weather preventive measures
In Denmark, Tryg has expanded its existing 'Bolig hotline', available for customers with house insurance, to also include guidance and inspiration on how to protect their homes against severe weather.

Prevention as part of climate coverage
Commercial customers in Denmark can enhance their building insurance with optional climate coverage, providing additional compensation not only for the claim itself but also for implementing climate-related preventive measures that help reduce the risk of future claims.
{70}------------------------------------------------
Advocating for collective action towards climate adaptation
As one of the largest insurance companies in Scandinavia, Tryg experiences directly how a changing climate impacts the life of its customers. In 2025, Tryg conducted a survey showing broad concern in Denmark, Sweden and Norway that climate-related damages will worsen over time. In Denmark, three out of four expect the consequences of weather-related water damage will increase in the future and more than one in three are concerned that their homes will be affected1.
Tryg sees first-hand how water is not merely damaging houses and assets, as people's homes, memories and personal belongings are what is lost.
Tryg wishes for a national climate adaptation foundation to be established. One that gathers a range of relevant actors to collectively prioritise, initiate and finance the climate adaptation necessary in Denmark. In Tryg's view, it is a political responsibility to ensure the necessary climate adaptation, so that ordinary citizens are not left to shoulder the burden and cost alone.
It is clear that further action is needed if we are to withstand the effects and protect our shared assets, natural environment, infrastructure, homes and local communities against the weather of the future. Tryg is convinced that efficient climate adaptation requires collective efforts: Politicians, authorities, experts, companies and civil society – all must come together to develop the best solutions.
In 2025, Tryg launched a campaign on climate adaptation with the overarching purpose of addressing the increasing weather-related risks and demonstrating its commitment to protecting customers' homes and tackling concerns through active engagement and political advocacy.
As part of its campaign, Tryg published the report 'KlimaTryg Fremtid' (climate-safe future). Based on more than 7,200 respondents, experts, stakeholders and public data sources, Tryg has mapped out the changing climate of Denmark and created awareness and understanding of the implications for families, nature and the society - today and in the future.


Read the report 'KlimaTryg Fremtid' (Link).

Three out of four expect the consequences of weather-related water damage will increase in the future.

More than one out of three are concerned that their homes will be affected.
{71}------------------------------------------------
Climate-related risks
Climate-related risks are an integral part of Tryg's portfolio management, pricing and underwriting processes. Tryg continuously monitors developments in climate-related risks to ensure that they are reflected in prognoses and financial planning as well as in pricing and underwriting activities.
Tryg applies consensus-based UN Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP2.6, RCP4.5 and RCP8.5) to assess the potential impact of climate change on its business. The impacts of these low, medium and high emission scenarios are considered in relation to Tryg's portfolio and claims patterns on a short, medium and long-term time horizon to understand the physical climate risks.
Physical climate risks
The scenario analysis shows that the effects of climate change are expected to be significant within this century, with visible changes from decade to decade. Increases in average temperatures and sea levels are expected to be followed by a significant increase in the frequency and severity of extreme weather events, i.e., heavy precipitation and flooding or drought. Also, coastal flooding is expected to be a significant issue on a global scale due to rising sea levels. Particularly in terms of coastal flooding, the increase is also expected to impact the interface of what can be insured and what will be covered through national schemes, measures or services. Risks associated with wind storms had been expected to be relatively unchanged. Recent research indicates, however, that average wind speed can increase – dependent upon developments in emission levels.
Regardless, more volatility is expected to cause an increase in the frequency and severity of weather-related claims across all Tryg's customers. The sections below outline how Tryg continuously works to mitigate these effects.
Pricing
As the majority of Tryg's insurance policies are renewed annually, it is expected that Tryg to a higher degree can adapt to trends through annual price adjustments.
To further improve pricing practices and risk differentiation, Tryg continuously works to develop and acquire new advanced data sources. Private in Norway has developed a Topographical Wetness Index combining externally sourced geodata such as height, slope and drainage with Tryg's large pool of historical claims data. This enables Tryg to increase price differentiation across customers: Some customers will be charged higher prices while others lower – essentially, this improves Tryg's pricing sophistication.
Underwriting risks
At present, reinsurance is employed as a risk mitigation mechanism to reduce underwriting risk in circumstances where adequate risk dispersion cannot be achieved through standard portfolio diversification. This serves to limit the insurer's exposure to high-severity and weatherrelated claims.
In the event of large-scale incidents involving damage to buildings and contents, Tryg's reinsurance programme provides coverage consistent with the Solvency II Directive's Standard Formula scenario, which corresponds to an event occurring more than once over a period of 200-250 years. The retention applicable to such events is DKK 300m plus reinstatement. Tryg maintains its expectation

that weather-related claims on an annual basis will amount to DKK 800m.
In Denmark, compensation for claims caused by storm surges is provided through a statutory scheme administered by the Danish Natural Hazards Council (Naturskaderådet), pursuant to national legislation. In Norway, compensation for claims resulting from natural perils is provided through the Norwegian Natural Perils Pool (Norsk Naturskadepool), a mandatory insurance scheme established under national law. Sweden currently does not have a setup for public climate compensation.
Product development
The expected future increase in climate and weather-related claims, the transition towards a low-carbon economy and the associated changing consumer preferences emphasise the relevance of Tryg's existing insurance products, particularly products helping customers adapt to climate change and implement preventive measures to protect their belongings. This includes specific climate coverage for buildings, enabling customers to install preventive measures as part of the claims handling to avoid recurring claims in the future.
Under its 2027 strategy, Tryg is committed to aligning 30 product categories, corresponding to 60% of all relevant product categories across the Group, with the EU Taxonomy. This will guide Tryg's efforts to ensure that climate
{72}------------------------------------------------
adaptation and prevention are central elements in Tryg's product offering to both private and commercial customers. Among the product categories that have been aligned to meet the criteria for climate adaptation so far are insurance products for house, building, cabin, agriculture, tractor, car, boat and light truck.
More specifically, Tryg advises its customers on how to protect their assets from climate-related damage e.g. by storing vehicles or boats inside and installing measures to prevent water damage or pipe bursts.
Tryg also works closely with local authorities to prevent damage to buildings and assets through, for example, a commitment to share data on areas that are exposed to weatherrelated claims.
Strengthening organisational response to climate change and extreme weather events
The difficulty when considering climate change is to reconcile the fact that the time horizon is much longer than the time horizon used in the strategic planning periods. The challenge resides within the long-term dynamics of climate change and how they impact the insurance portfolio. The climate change risk landscape is currently assessed to be at an acceptable level. However, climate change risk will require more and more focus in the future.
To take this into account, Tryg established a central 'Climate Excellence' lead in 2025 under Tryg's Technical excellence. The purpose of the Climate Excellence lead is to ensure a common and Group-wide approach to the climate, and to develop scalable solutions for pricing, products and prevention that can be applied across business areas and national borders. This new unit will ensure that Tryg utilises its combined strengths and capabilities across the Scandinavian organisation.
Shedding light on the societal implications of climate change
As part of Tryg's national campaign in Denmark focusing on the necessary collective efforts and political actions that must be undertaken to protect citizens, companies and communities against the impact of climate change, Tryg initiated a social media baton inviting key societal actors to share their perspective on the need for climate adaptation. Read about Tryg's campaign on page 71.
Climate-related risk categories - how climate change can impact claims patterns
A climate-related risk taxonomy focuses on identifying and defining risk categories associated with climate-related hazards. The table below shows examples of the physical climate-related hazards that can impact Tryg's customers and claims costs.
| Temperature-related | Wind-related | Water-related | Solid mass-related |
|---|---|---|---|
| Changes to temperature variability,particularly variability around 0oC, canimpact the risk of traffic incidents as wellas accidental falls. | Changing wind pattens and storms &hurricanes damage our customers' homes,buildings, effects and infrastructure insociety. | More heavy precipitation (rain, hail, snow/ice) – especially cloudbursts – damagesboth the property and vehicles of ourcustomers.More flooding damages properties,vehicles and machinery and interrupts ourcustomers' businesses. | More landslides destroy property andinfrastructure and leave our customerswithout a place to live and our businesscustomers with interrupted businesses. |
{73}------------------------------------------------
Transitional risks
The transition to a global low-carbon economy is also associated with transitional risks. For Tryg these are primarily viewed as operational, strategic, regulatory and reputational.
From an operational and strategic perspective, integrating climate considerations into underwriting, pricing, reserving and capital modelling is a complex task with no clear reference or best practice examples. There is a need to integrate new types of data within existing data models and to reassess how risks are analysed.
The increase in climate-related policies and regulatory requirements is expected to have significant implications for Tryg in terms of ways-of-working, documentation and data requirements, etc.
Finally, and closely connected to the above transition risks, is the reputational risk associated with external perceptions of Tryg's climate-related actions and disclosures.
Originating from shifts in consumer preferences, stigmatisation of sectors and increased stakeholder concerns, the general societal expectations on reasonable climate actions for an insurance company are still fragmented, making it a turbulent and complex risk picture to address.
In summary, while Tryg faces several transitional risks due to climate-related policies and market changes, actions for adaptation and mitigation and for accumulating and integrating more data are essential for Tryg to be able to navigate these challenges and maintain competitiveness.
The climate scenarios have not directly been applied to the assessment of transition risks, yet dependent on scenarios, the severity levels of transitional risks will differ.

{74}------------------------------------------------
Climate targets
Tryg has defined emission reduction targets for Scope 1, 2 and 3, addressing its own emissions and the primary indirect emissions relating to suppliers and investments. For all targets, internal stakeholders across relevant functions have been closely involved in defining scope, data sources and target levels.
| Base year | Targets | Progress | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strategic targets | 2025 | 2024 | 2027 | 2030 | |||
| ESRS ID | % | % | % | % | |||
| Future-fit products | 30 product categories aligned withthe EU Taxonomy (No.) | 25 | 18 | 30 | N/A | ||
| E5-3_04 | 10% reduction in use of new materials per claim | 1.2 | 0 | 10 | N/A | ||
| SBTi targets | |||||||
| E1-4_07 | 42% CO2e reduction in Scope 1 | 15 | 0 | N/A | 42 | ||
| 100% sourcing of renewable electricity in Scope 2 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||
| Climate action | 40% of suppliers have set SBTi targetsa) | 23 | 10 | N/A | 40 | ||
| 45.9% CO2e reduction per m2 | 20 | 0 | N/A | 45.9 | |||
| Other climate targets | |||||||
| E5-3_03 | 6% CO2e reduction per claim | 9 | 0 | 6 | N/A | ||
| 100% of premiums from fossil fuel commercialcustomers covered by green transition plans | 86 | 78 | 100 | N/A |
Foundational targets
| % | % | % | % | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1-4_10 | CO2e reduction from energy consumption | 34 | 0 | 7.5 | 15 | ||
| E5-3_06 | Operational targets | CO2e reduction from waste in own operation | 6 | 0 | 3 | 6 | |
| CO2e reductions from business travel, air | -20 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
Progress on target

Accounting policies
Strategic targets
Product categories aligned with the EU Taxonomy:
Product categories are determined in accordance with the EU Taxonomy and the related technical screening criteria. A product category comprises one or more insurance products covering the same insured object, such as a house. Product categories are identified and assessed by business unit and country.
Reduction in use of new materials per claim: All claims that include reused materials or repairs. Progress is measured as an average reduction across all claims. See Accounting policies on E5-4, page 83.
CO2e reduction in Scope 1: See accounting policies on E1-6_07, page 79.
Sourcing of renewable electricity: See accounting policies on E1-6_08, page 79.
Suppliers have set SBTi targets: Target is based on spend i.e. the suppliers covering 40% of spend. SBTi commitment is assessed through ESG questionnaires.
Reduction per m2 in covered bond portfolio: Based on data on the underlying real estate loans financing EPC-certified buildings, calculated per square metre of the financed properties in the issuers' cover pools. See Accounting policies for Scope 3, C15 on page 80.
CO2e reduction per claim: All claims that include reused materials, repairs or avoided transportation are included and measured as an average reduction across all claims. See Accounting policies for Scope 3, C1 and C2 on page 80.
Premiums from fossil fuel customers that have transition plans: Covers customers active within the extraction and production of fossil fuels (defined by NACE codes). Transition plans include targets aligned with the Paris
Agreement and/or specific initiatives or investments for decarbonisation. It is solely based on publicly available information.
Foundational targets
CO2e reduction from energy consumption: See the accounting policies regarding E1-6_09, page 79. CO2e reduction from waste in own operation and from business travel, air: See the accounting policies regarding E1-6_11, respectively, category 5 and 6, page 80.
{75}------------------------------------------------
Developments climate targets
Strategic targets
Future-fit products
Climate adapted products: In 2025, Tryg adapted seven product categories to the criteria of the EU Taxonomy, bringing the total number adapted product categories to 25 – well on track to reach 30 product categories in 2027. Among the product categories added during the year are insurance products for agriculture, cabin, light truck, car and tractor.
Material reduction per claim: Tryg reduced the use of new materials per claim by 1.2% relative to 2024. Performance is driven by initiatives to repair and reuse, in particularly an increase in the use of reused spare parts. Data currently covers motor claims in Denmark, Norway and Sweden. As data from other claims areas become available these will be included. The target is set for all claims types. Results are slightly below expectations due to, among other factors the increased complexity in repairing windshields. A number of projects are expected to further accelerate progress on the target going forward.
Climate actions
CO2e reductions in Scope 1: 15% reduction in Scope 1 emissions is driven by an internal focus on nudging employees to select an electrical company car instead of one running on fossil fuels. A smaller share of Scope 1 is composed of emissions from natural gas. A shift to district heating at one of the largest sites has further contributed to the improvement. Only one minor location is now using natural gas.
Sourcing of renewable electricity (Scope 2): Tryg continues to work to minimise its electricity use across sites through energy efficiency projects and conversion to LED lightning. In 2025, Tryg vacated one of its locations in Ballerup which
has further added to the decrease in consumption. For the electricity consumption, Tryg purchased Guarantees of Origin (GO) certificates.
Scope 3 emissions
Suppliers have validated SBTi targets: During the first year of working with the target, there has been good progress compared to the baseline, with more suppliers having their SBTi targets validated. Tryg has incorporated requirements to the larger suppliers into contractual agreements and dialogues.
CO2e reduction per m2 in covered bonds:
Emissions per m2 from Tryg's investments, decreased by 20% during the year. The improvement is primarily due to changes in the underlying assets towards more energy-efficient assets in the ship credits and other covered bonds in which Tryg invests.
CO2e reductions per claim: Tryg has reached a CO2e reduction of 9% per claim, which is beyond expected, exceeding the 2027 target. Performance is driven by positive contribution across each country to continue repairing and using reused material, significant cost-saving measures, and the claims mix of the year with e.g. fewer building related claims. Together, these factors resulted in a 2025 performance significantly beyond expected.
Fossil fuel customers: 86% of premiums from customers active in extraction and production of fossil fuels are covered by green transition plans. Tryg will engage in dialogue with the remaining customers.
Foundational targets
CO2e from energy consumption: The CO2e emissions from energy consumption decreased by 34% during the year, well above the 2030 target of 15%. The reduction is primarily a result of closing a location in Ballerup, together with general energy-efficiency projects. The energy consumption mix is available in the table on page 78.
CO2e from waste in own operations: The CO2e emissions from waste decreased by 6%, which is the 2030 target level. Total waste level increased during 2025 as a result of relocating from one of the locations in Ballerup, disposing of inventory associated with a previous location move in Sweden and the inclusion of IT waste. However, due to updated emission factors from DEFRA (2024), it translates into a CO2e reduction.
CO2e from business travel, air: CO2e emissions from business travel by air increased by 20% during the year. This is a negative trend towards the target of 5% reduction by 2030. There is a general increase in longer flights, which increases the number of kilometres travelled.

{76}------------------------------------------------
Total Scopes 1, 2 and 3 and total GHG emissions
The table presents Tryg's total GHG Scope 1-3. Accounting policies for the respective figures are described under the Accounting policies for E1-6 on page 79 - 80.
| Annual | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Base year2024 | 2025/ 2024 | 2027 | Milestones and target years | 2030 | % target/Base year | |||
| ESRS ID | tCO2e | tCO2e | % | tCO2e | % | tCO2e | % | % | |
| Scope 1 GHG emissions | |||||||||
| E1-6_07Gross Scope 1 GHG emissions | 955 | 1,120 | 15 | N/A | N/A | 649 | 42 | 7c) | |
| E1-6_08Scope 1 GHG emissions from regulated emission trading schemes (%) | 100 | 100 | 0 | N/A | 100 | N/A | 100 | N/A | |
| Scope 2 GHG emissions | |||||||||
| E1-6_09Gross location-based Scope 2 GHG emissions | 648 | 978 | 34 | 905 | 7.5 | 831 | 15 | 3c) | |
| E1-6_10Gross market-based Scope 2 GHG emissions | 272 | 332 | 18 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| Significant Scope 3 GHG emissions | |||||||||
| E1-6_11Total gross indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions | 492,929 | 589,735 | 16 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| C1. Purchased goods and servicesa) | 210,147 | 238,659 d) | 12 | N/A | 6b) | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| C2. Capital goods | 80 | 732d) | 89 | N/A | 6b) | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| C3. Fuel and energy-related activities | 696 | 518 | -34 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| C5. Waste | 105 | 112 | 6 | 108 | 3 | 105 | 6 | 1c) | |
| C6. Business travelling | 3,184 | 2,741 | -16 | 2,686 | 2 | 2,604 | 5 | 1c) | |
| C15. Investments | 278,717 | 346,972 d) | 20 | N/A | N/A | 196,306 | 45.9 | 7c) | |
| Total GHG emissions | |||||||||
| E1-6_12Total GHG emissions (location-based) | 494,532 | 591,833 | 16 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| E1-6_13Total GHG emissions (market-based) | 494,156 | 591,186 | 16 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Developments GHG emissions
Developments related to climate targets are described on p. 76.
Scope 3-C1. Purchased goods and services:
Emissions decreased as a result of a companywide focus on reducing procurement spend as well as positive contributions from emissionssaving initiatives such as repairs and reuse in the claims handling process across in particularly the main categories of building, motor, content and travel claims.
Scope 3-C2. Capital goods: The figure has been restated in 2025. The decrease is driven by a general focus on procurement cost savings.
a) Scope 3 C11. has been merged with Scope 3 C1. to consolidate into a single total SBTi target.
**b)**Transversal intensity targets 'CO2e reduction per claim' at 6% covers Scope 3 C1. and C2.
**c)**Annual % Target/base year are calculated on the 2030 target.
d) Figures are restated see Basis for preparation for details.
{77}------------------------------------------------
Energy consumption and mix
| 2025 | 2024 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ESRS ID | MWh | MWh | |
| Non-renewable sources | |||
| Total energy consumption from electricity and district heating | 13,992 | 15,490 | |
| E1-5_02 | Total energy consumption from fossil sources | 3,601 | 4,533 |
| E1-5_01 | Total energy consumption related to own operations | 17,593 | 20,023 |
| Renewable sources | |||
| E1-5_06 | Fuel consumption from renewable sources | 4 | 122 |
| E1-5_07 | Renewable energy consumption (market-based) | 12,742 | 13,933 |
| E1-5_05 | Total energy consumption from renewable sources | 12,745 | 14,056 |
| E1-5_09 | Renewable sources in total energy consumption (%) | 72 | 70 |
GHG emissions
| 2025 | 2024 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ESRS ID | |||
| Share of Contractual instruments | |||
| E1-6_22 | Scope 2 GHG emissions covered by contractual instruments (%) | 58 | 56a) |
| GHG intensity based on insurance revenue | |||
| E1-6_30 | GHG emissions intensity, location-based(total GHG emissions (tCO2e) per insurance revenue) | 0.00001 | 0.00002 |
| E1-6_31 | GHG emissions intensity, market-based(total GHG emissions (tCO2e) per insurance revenue) | 0.00001 | 0.00002 |

{78}------------------------------------------------
Accounting policies GHG emissions
GHG emissions: E1-6 Gross Scopes 1, 2 and 3 and total GHG emissions
Tryg's carbon footprint provides a general overview of Tryg's greenhouse gas emissions converted into CO2 equivalents (CO2e). It is based on reported data from internal and external systems. The carbon footprint analysis is based on the international standard: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard, by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Initiative (GHG Protocol) and developed by the World Resources Institute (WRI) and World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD, 2021) [E1-4_18].
The reporting considers the following greenhouse gases; all converted into Carbon Dioxide Equivalents (CO2e) based on the methodology provided by the GHG Protocol. The calculation is based on the 'financial control' consolidation approach, which defines what should be included in the carbon inventory as well as in the different emission Scopes 1-3. The reporting period follows the financial reporting period [E1-6_16]. The reporting is presented by source type, the physical or operational origin of emissions.
For the reporting year 2025, there have been no material changes to the definitions applied or to the structure of the value chain that would impact the comparability of the disclosed greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions [E1-6_14].
Emissions reporting and calculations
The key external sources used as a basis for the CO₂e calculations in this report are the International Energy Agency (IEA), the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the UK Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC), the ecoinvent Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) Database, and DEFRA (UK Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs). The principles for selecting the appropriate emission conversion factors are to use the most recent and relevant schemes recommended by Tryg's carbon calculation IT solution and compared to best practices. The emission factors are chosen at the beginning of the reporting period to ensure consistency throughout the period [E1-6_14-15].
Scope 1 and 2 emissions all come from fully consolidated accounting groups [E1-6_02]. The majority of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions, as well as part of Scope 3, originate from facility data provided by external suppliers, which is received with a delay relative to the time of consumption.
Emissions factors for Scope 1-2 and part of Scope 3 are determined based on actual consumption data from Tryg's facilities exceeding 750 m². For facilities below 750 m², emissions are estimated using consumptionbased assumptions to ensure consistency and completeness of reporting.
Due to Tryg's rapid year-end closing process, parts of Q4 figures are estimated based on relevant data from previous periods adjusted for any known changes. When actual data becomes available, updates are made in the next external report if the variance exceeds the materiality threshold.
Further details regarding methods and assumptions are provided under each disclosure for Scope 1–3.
Scope 1 GHG emissions
Scope 1 consists of the total energy emissions from fossil fuel sources, which are emissions from company cars in Denmark and Sweden and from stationary combustion [E1-6_07]. The percentage of Scope 1 GHG emissions from regulated emission trading schemes refers to the share of total Scope 1 emissions that fall under these schemes. In the Nordic countries where Tryg is located, the main regulated emission trading scheme is the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), which applies to both EU member states (Denmark and Sweden) and Norway as part of the European Economic Area [E1-6_08]. In 2025, the target has been aligned and validated with the SBTi for 2030, and therefore no interim target is set for 2027.
Scope 2 GHG emissions
The gross location- and marked-based Scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions include indirect emissions related to purchased energy, i.e. electricity and heating/cooling at Tryg facilities. According to the GHG protocol, Scope 2 emissions are calculated as both location- and marked-based [E1-6_09-10].
Scope 2 emissions with renewable contractual instruments
Percentage of contractual instruments for unbundled energy with attribute claims, relative to Scope 2 GHG emissions, represent Tryg's consumption of energy that contains energy from renewable sources. The indicator includes how much of the total consumed energy comes from electricity generated through Guarantee of Origin (GO) certificates, which according to the GHG protocol is considered the same as Renewable Energy Certificates (RECS). Tryg covers 100% of its electricity consumption through GO certificates [E1-6_22].
Non-renewable sources
Total energy consumption within Tryg's own operations is derived from utility activity data, including meter readings and documentation provided by suppliers. This encompasses energy consumption from fossil fuels, district heating, stationary combustion and electricity used across Tryg's facilities.
Fossil fuel consumption is categorised into two segments: company cars and on-site usage. Company cars are owned or leased in Denmark and Sweden; Norway does not operate company cars. Stationary combustion accounts for less than 1% of fossil fuel consumption and includes natural gas and diesel used for emergency generators. Electricity consumption reflects the Nordic energy mix under the Nordic energy cooperation framework [E1-5_01-02]. Tryg does not utilise any direct nuclear energy sources. [E1-5_03].
Renewable sources
Renewable energy consumption is divided into two categories:
- Fuel consumption from renewable sources, which includes natural gas containing a proportion of biogas. The biogas share is based on figures published by https:// groengas.dgc.dk/ (2022) [E1-5_06].
{79}------------------------------------------------
- The renewable energy consumption is based on purchased or acquired electricity, heat, steam and cooling from renewable sources (market-based), calculated using market-based emission factors to ensure a conservative and representative approach. [E1-5 07].
The proportion of renewable sources in total energy consumption represents the share of energy derived from renewable sources [E1-5 09].
Scope 3 GHG emissions
Scope 3 covers a total of 15 categories of which 6 categories are currently determined in scope according to Tryg's value chain. Emissions from each category are reported separately to ensure transparency regarding their impact on the total figure [E1-6_11].
The following Scope 3 GHG emission categories have been excluded from the inventory; explanations for these exclusions are provided below.
-
Category 4. Upstream transportation and distribution: Tryg does not produce physical goods and therefore has no transportation of components. Plans are in place to include transportation related to indirect products and services in the coming years.
-
Category 7. Employee commuting: Tryg's employees commute from their private homes to Tryg locations using various modes of transportation. The calculation of these figures is currently assessed to be subject to significant uncertainty. This will be further evaluated in the coming years.
-
Category 8. Upstream leased assets: All emissions from leased assets operating under long-term agreements are included in Scope 1-2 (purchased energy), in accordance with the GHG Protocol.
-
Category 9. Downstream transportation and distribution: Tryg has no physical products that require transportation or distribution after the point of sale.
-
Category 10. Processing of sold products: Tryg does not sell products that are used in the production of other companies' goods or services.
-
Category 11. Use of sold products: The act of handling claims does not generate emissions under use of sold products but, rather, falls under C1.
-
Category 12. End-of-life treatment of sold products: Tryg does not offer products that generate waste at the end of their life cycle.
-
Category 13. Downstream leased assets: Tryg does not lease assets to other companies.
-
Category 14. Franchises: Tryg does not operate any franchises.
Scope 3 includes direct and indirect emissions from Tryg's facilities and activities in the value chain:
• Category 1. Purchased goods and services: This category includes both Tryg's procurement activities and claims handling. Emissions are calculated based on spend data sourced from Tryg's financial and procurement systems and activity data from the claims handling system. A number of improvement measures have been implemented to improve data quality and therefore the category has been restated for the baseline year and 2025. There has been a definition adjustment whereby Category 11 was merged into Category 1 and spendbased calculations for Motor Denmark have been replaced with activity-based calculations. The data foundation has been strengthened through improved methodologies and adjustments for
-
currency and inflation factors to ensure accuracy and comparability across reporting years. Baseline has been restated see Basis for preparation for details.
-
Category 2. Capital goods: This category includes Tryg's capital goods and fixed assets owned by the company as well as long-term leased assets used in operations. For baseline and 2025 reporting, the methodology has been updated to utilise Tryg's finance-related asset register and registered assets, ensuring alignment with financial depreciation practices, and due to updated emission factors, exchange rates, and the inclusion of inflation adjustments. Baseline has been restated see Basis for preparation for details.
-
Category 3. Fuel and energy-related activities (not included in Scope 1 or 2): Data point based on the derived distribution by multiplying the total facilities and transport consumption figures by the relevant emission factor.
-
Category 5. Waste generated in operations: Waste is generated in own operations and based on invoices from waste management supplier. The waste is characteristic of classic office waste, and therefore not further granulated than for the CO₂e emissions. In 2025, IT waste was added to Tryg's waste fractions to make reporting more comprehensive. Since it is refurbished, it does not result in any additional CO₂e emissions.
-
Category 6. Business travel: Includes flights, public transportation, taxis and other business travel. Data is sourced from external travel management systems and Tryg's expense system. The inventory combines travel distance and spend data. From 2025, air travel registrations in Tryg's travel and expense solution are also
-
included. This addition is minor, representing about 2% of total business travel compared to the baseline, as most air travel is recorded in the external system.
-
Category 15. Investments: CO2e emissions from Tryg's investments in covered bonds are calculated by using key figures (CO2e emissions per million in DKK) supplied by Capital Market Partners (CMP). CMP collect publicly available data from the respective issuers in Denmark. CO2e emissions from Swedish and Norwegian issuers are not yet possible for them to produce. Therefore, these two CO2e emission figures on covered bonds are calculated using a key figure for the Danish portfolio. Tryg has restated its 2024 financed emissions figure following a significant historical revision by one of the bond issuers in which Tryg invests. The issuer updated its emissions data, requiring the reported figure to be adjusted accordingly. Baseline has been restated see Basis for preparation for details.
Total GHG emissions are expressed in both location-based and market-based figures and are based on a sum of Scope 1, 2, and reported Scope 3 categories [E1-6_02, 12-13].
Share of Scope 2 emissions covered by contractual instruments Percentage of Scope 2 energy (electricity and district heating) covered by renewable contractual instruments (GOs). Baseline has been restated see Basis for preparation for details.
GHG intensity based on insurance revenue
Tryg's GHG emissions intensity is Tryg's total GHG emissions per net insurance revenue, and are based on the total GHG emissions (location-based or market-based) in $tCO_2e$ divided by insurance revenue from the Income overview on page 17 [E1-6_30-31].
{80}------------------------------------------------

Resource use and circular economy
Material impacts, risks and opportunities
For the standard 'Resource use and circular economy', one IRO - a negative impact - is identified related to resource use in the claims handling process.
Negative impact
Resource use in claims handling
Resolving around 2 million claims per year requires substantial amounts of materials, such as wood, metal, plastic and glass when customers need to rebuild their house, repair a car or replace technical equipment. Extensive use of resources puts pressure on the environment and nature in connection with extracting and producing materials as well as on the climate due to the related emissions.
Claims handling is performed by external partners and suppliers who replace, repair or restore the broken items. Tryg has defined specific strategic targets for reducing resource use and associated CO2e emissions from the claims handling process. Through its established supplier network, particularly within motor claims, and increasingly also building claims, efforts are being made to establish new practices for efficient repairs and increased employment of used materials.
Policies related to resource use and circular economy
Tryg's Climate and environmental policy expresses Tryg's commitment to minimising resource use in the claims handling process, particularly the use of virgin materials. The policy does not currently address the use of renewable resources. It is owned by the Head of the Sustainability & ESG function, with responsibility for implementation allocated to relevant functions, e.g. procurement and claims. Climate and environmental policy (Link)
Actions for advancing repairs and reuse
To address the negative material impact of resource use and associated CO2e emissions in the claims handling process, Tryg has for several years worked to further the use of repairs and the employment of reused materials in close collaboration with suppliers.
This requires new ways of working, with new practices and supply chains having to be established both internally in Tryg and externally at the claims suppliers. The availability of highquality used spare parts and materials in the market is a prerequisite to advancing the agenda, and is something Tryg is actively engaged in through partnerships. It is also a concept that requires a shift in the mindset of customers to accept the use of recycled spare parts and materials. Maturity in relation to practices around reuse and repair across Tryg's different supplier groups and sectors varies. Tryg started by focusing on its largest claims areas, namely motor and building, and this is where most progress is currently being made. However, efforts are also maturing across other claims areas such as contents and electronics.

{81}------------------------------------------------
In 2025, Tryg has focused on its two new targets related to claims handling: reduction of, respectively, the use of new material and of CO2e emissions. Efforts build on established practices for motor, building and contents, for example repair of windows, doors, floors, tiles, electronics, mobile phones, tablets, computers, car bumpers, rims, headlights, car body parts and windshields as well as the utilisation of used spare parts.
Responsibility and profitability go hand in hand
Tryg's efforts to push for more repairs and employment of reused material is a good example of how responsibility and profitability can go hand in hand. Used spare parts and repairs are often a cost-effective approach to handling claims once practices are established. It is important to underline that repairs or the utilisation of used spare parts will never compromise safety or quality for customers.
Incorporated in terms and contracts
As it is still early days, supply chains are not always fully established and trying to locate used spare parts can be a more complex task for suppliers than merely replacing with new. Close collaboration and knowledge sharing as well as clear expectations are therefore crucial in Tryg's ongoing supplier dialogues.
For customers, a section is included in the insurance terms, though currently only for motor. It states that if Tryg decides to repair a car, it should be restored to the condition prior to the damage, meaning that Tryg has the right to repair the car and utilise used spare parts as long as it is restored to the same condition as before the claim occurred. Specifically for glass, the term states that if the damage can be repaired, Tryg has the right to require a repair instead of a replacement.
Specific KPIs for repair rates are now included in contracts with suppliers in the motor category and for the first group of building suppliers. To monitor progress, a digital supplier reporting dashboard has been rolled out to parts of the supplier network for motor and building in Denmark, enabling Tryg and the respective suppliers to follow the KPIs and their performance on repair rates and use of material.
Recognising that this is an area under development, Tryg is explicitly concentrating on building capacity across suppliers by facilitating the sharing of best practices and new methods. Internally, knowledge sharing is critical for ensuring that everyone from procurement to claims to the actual claims assessors are aware of the specific initiatives in place. such as rims or car bumper repairs.
Quarterly reports to management ensure continuous tracking of performance and investigation of root causes.
Exploring new possibilities
To expand the number of initiatives, the different business areas across Denmark, Norway and Sweden regularly conduct pilot projects to assess the applicability, feasibility, impact and data foundation of a given technique or process.
In 2025, some of these focused on building materials with Tryg testing the concept of donating used and undamaged building material to organisations. Together with Trondheim Municipality, Tryg has passed on wooden parquet floors to the municipality for the purpose of reuse. This contributes to an awareness around how to reuse undamaged material and more circular ways of working.
Another example of a Norwegian pilot project is a partnership with one of the largest car repair shop chains on the use of reused car parts within the warranty period – i.e. for cars less than 5 years old. The market standard is to only use new spare parts within the warranty period, but this partnership tested these boundaries. Under the prerequisite that the reused spare part is never older than the rest of the car and that customers' warranties remain intact, the project has progressed well and is being expanded to the suppliers' certified car repair shops across Norway. Motivated by this, other actors have also expressed an interest in something similar, which is being further explored. This expands the scope of potential repairs and thus increases the potential for working with resource efficiency.
Resale to reduce scrapping
In addition to reducing the climate impact of claims handling by repairing and reusing more, Tryg is also trying to limit the amount of scrapped products from claims. In some cases Tryg might compensate customers for products that are still functional and which could be given a new lease of life. In other instances, the stillfunctioning item is resold through external partners. For example, Trygg-Hansa has a partnership with a company that helps to resell these products at a discount.
Targets
Use of new materials
Tryg has set a strategic intensity target to reduce the use of new materials per claim by 10% by 2027 compared to 2024.
In 2025, Tryg reduced the use of new materials per claim by 1.2% relative to 2024. Performance is driven by initiatives to repair and reuse, in particularly an increase in the use of reused spare parts. Data currently covers motor claims
in Denmark, Norway and Sweden. As data from other claims areas become available these will be included. The target is set for all claims types. Results are slightly below expectations due to, among other factors the increased complexity in repairing windshields. A number of projects are expected to further accelerate progress on the target going forward.
The target applies to resource inflows, i.e. the materials used across all claims categories. With the overarching objective of reducing the amount of new materials used in claims handling, the target relates to the increased use of reused materials or repair techniques and the consequential decrease in the use of primary new raw materials.
As such, this does not address circular product design, waste management or other matters related to resource use and the circular economy. No external stakeholders have been involved in setting the target.
The target is included in the overview of Climate targets on page 75.
{82}------------------------------------------------
Resource inflows
| 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|
| ESRS ID | Tonnes | Tonnes |
| Resource inflows | ||
| E5-4_02Total weight of products, technical and biological materials used | 5,238 | 5,657a) |
| E5-4_04Total weight of secondary reused or recycled components including packaging | 423 | 427a) |
Developments resource inflows
The amount of materials used for claims handling is slightly declining. The reduction is driven by a company-wide focus on repairs and reuse, thereby reducing material consumption. Improvements in data availability have made it possible to identify more specific parts thereby making it possible to add the right average weight factor resulting in more accurate reporting.
Accounting policies
Resource inflows E5-4
Claims handling is considered a material sustainability matter, covering the total weight of products and technical/biological materials used. The most resourceintensive areas are motor and building claims. In 2025, reporting focuses on motor, with data collected from systems in Denmark, Norway and Sweden. All systems track spare parts in tonnes, applying weight factors from the Nordic circular auto parts system [E5-4_02, 06]. The total weight of reused or recycled materials, including packaging, is based on reused and recycled spare parts. Reporting follows the same method as for new parts but applies categories for reuse and recycling [E5-4_04]. Both figures include estimates for parts of Q4 2025, as invoice-based data was not yet available at the time of reporting. Due to the shift from spend-based to more activity-based calculations, the 2024 baseline has been restated.

{83}------------------------------------------------
Examples of repair or reuse initiatives in claims handling

Repair of most frequently replaced car parts, such as headlights, bumpers and body parts
Continuously working to increase repair rates at auto shops through close collaboration with preferred suppliers.

SMART repair motor
Smarter and more time-efficient repair methods for vehicles. One-stop-shop for minor damage focused on repairs and reduced leap time.

Restoration and repair of building components
Repairing chipped stone floors and countertops using targeted techniques, and restoring window frames and exterior doors instead of doing a full replacement.

Smarter solutions in wet room repairs
Efficient moisture-proofing in wet areas to avoid extensive demolition and allowing for partial repairs of wet room membranes.

Partial repairs of interiors
Instead of replacing or restoring a full living room, focus is on repairing the specific damage to walls, ceilings or floors.

Repair and refurbishment of consumer electronics
Repairing mobile phones and computers, or refurbishing by giving new life to used spare parts.
{84}------------------------------------------------
EU Taxonomy
Scope and basis for preparation
This section constitutes Tryg's reporting pursuant to Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 (the EU Taxonomy) for the financial year 2025. It covers Tryg's non-life insurance activities and investment activities. The accompanying Article 8 templates are reproduced in their original format without any structural changes, and the quantitative figures are presented exclusively in those templates. Narrative disclosures explain scope, methods and material year-over-year developments that underpin the KPI tables.
As part of the EU Commission's efforts to simplify sustainability reporting under the Omnibus package, the KPI template in Annex X for insurance and reinsurance undertakings has been revised. While the updated template is expected to apply from 1 January 2026 (covering the 2025 financial year), the Commission has clarified that undertakings may opt to use the previous version for this reporting cycle. Tryg has chosen to apply the previous template for its Taxonomy alignment reporting for the 2025 financial year.
Non-life insurance activities
KPI definition
Under the Taxonomy Regulation, non-life insurance is an enabling activity that can contribute to the EU's environmental objective 'climate change adaptation' when products directly support customers and other activities in adapting to physical climate-related risks.
The insurance-based Taxonomy alignment ratio represents the portion of Tryg's gross premiums written, both covered and not covered by the Taxonomy, that meets the technical screening criteria (substantial contribution), do no significant harm to other environmental objectives (DNSH) and comply with minimum social safeguards (MSS).

{85}------------------------------------------------
Nature, objective and evolution of Taxonomyaligned economic activities
As of 31 December 2025, DKK 940,431,934 representing 2.6% of Tryg's gross premiums written - are aligned with the EU Taxonomy, same ratio as in 2024. While the number of climate-adapted products increased from 18 in 2024 to 25 in 2025, the Taxonomy aligned ratio is unchanged year on year. This reflects the calculation methodology, where the scale of the denominator relative to the numerator limits the extent to which incremental additions of Taxonomy-aligned products are reflected in the ratio.
Tryg does not offer reinsurance products; therefore, A.1.2 and A.1.2.1 (incoming reinsurance) are not applicable.
Driving Taxonomy alignment across all markets and product segments
In 2023, Tryg began aligning insurance products with the EU Taxonomy, starting with house and building insurance across both Private and Commercial in Denmark, Norway and Sweden.
In 2024, Commercial in Denmark advanced this work by introducing climate adaptation measures to its already aligned building insurance product, including new climate coverage. Meanwhile, Tryg Norway expanded its portfolio of aligned products to include cabin, contents, car, moped, motorcycle, snowmobile, motorhome and boat insurance. Trygg-Hansa also aligned products for business and boat insurance.
Product categories aligned with the EU Taxonomy as of 2025
| Denmark | Norway | Sweden | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Private | House, cabin | House, cabin, contents, car,caravan, moped & MC, tractor,snowmobile, motorhome, boat | House, boat, cabin, car,light truck | |
| Commercial | Building, agriculture | Building, residential property | Building, movableproperty, car, light truck |
EU Taxonomy - Insurance activities
Substantial contribution to climate change
| adaptation | DNSH (Do No Significant Harm) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Economic activities | Absolutepremiums | Proportion ofpremiums | Proportion ofpremiums | Climate changemitigation | Water andmarineresources | Circulareconomy | Pollution | Biodiversityandecosystems | Minimumsafeguards |
| DKK | % | % | Y/N | Y/N | Y/N | Y/N | Y/N | Y/N | |
| 2025 | 2025 | 2024 | |||||||
| A.1 Non-life insurance and reinsurance underwriting | |||||||||
| Taxonomy-aligned activities (environmentally sustainable) | 940,431,934 | 2.6 | 2.6 | Y | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Y |
| A.1.1 Of which reinsured | 40,057,538 | 0.1 | 0.1 | Y | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Y |
| A.1.2. Of which stemming from reinsurance activity | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| A.1.2.1 Of which reinsured (retrocession) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| A.2 Non-life insurance and reinsurance underwritingTaxonomy-eligible but not environmentally sustainable activities | |||||||||
| (not Taxonomy-aligned activities) | 2,538,285 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| B. Non-life insurance and reinsurance underwriting | |||||||||
| Taxonomy-non-eligible activities | 35,022,344,389 | 97.4 | 97.4 | ||||||
| Total (A.1 + A.2 + B) | 35,965,314,608 | 100 | 100 |
{86}------------------------------------------------
In 2025, Tryg Denmark launched two additional Taxonomy-aligned products: cabin and agriculture insurance for private and commercial customers, respectively. Tryg Norway added tractor insurance to its already extensive list of aligned products, and Trygg-Hansa aligned car insurance and light truck insurance products for private and commercial customers.
In total, 25 products were Taxonomy-aligned by 31 December 2025, corresponding to 50% of all relevant product categories in Tryg.
As part of Tryg's strategic roadmap towards 2027, clear targets have been set to climateadapt an even broader range of products. This includes enabling business units to assess whether newly developed or redesigned products can be aligned with the EU Taxonomy criteria and to incorporate effective riskreducing measures to help customers adapt to climate change.
Meeting the technical screening criteria
To make a substantial contribution to climate change adaptation, Tryg has ensured that the aligned products comply with the technical screening criteria for insurance activities.
Screening criteria 1: State-of-the-art price modelling - using techniques that not only rely on historical trends but also integrate forwardlooking climate scenarios.
Tryg models climate risks independently from other risk types to ensure accurate pricing and risk assessment. For each product, the most relevant climate-related perils - such as cloudbursts, storms or floods - are integrated into the pricing model.
Tryg leverages historical internal claims data alongside external weather sources, including the Danish Meteorological Institute (DMI), the Norwegian Meteorological Institute, and the Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (SMHI). These datasets incorporate climate projections based on IPCC RCP scenarios.
To maintain relevance and accuracy, business units continuously update their analytical environment, refining data inputs and modelling techniques to reflect evolving weather patterns and emerging climate risks.
Screening criteria 2: Product design embedding risk-based rewards to encourage customers to prevent climate-related claims.
For each Taxonomy-aligned product, Tryg includes risk-based prevention incentives. For example, customers may benefit from reduced premiums or waived excesses when they take proactive claims prevention measures - such as installing backflow prevention valves in buildings, storing contents above basement level, keeping vehicles and boats indoors, installing transient protection systems to mitigate overvoltage and fire risks from lightning, or fitting heat pumps in vacation homes to prevent pipe bursts caused by freezing temperatures. The implementation of incentives varies across product categories, Private and Commercial and countries.
In addition to offering financial incentives, Tryg engages in proactive communication with customers to promote climate adaptation and claims prevention. This includes newsletters and targeted text message alerts sent ahead of extreme weather events, encouraging customers to take preventive measures. These text message alerts are based on hyperlocal forecasts provided by data partners and are directed at customers in the areas affected.
Screening criteria 3: Innovative insurance coverage solutions - including coverage against climate-related perils (e.g., storms and cloudbursts) relevant to customers.
To ensure that Taxonomy-aligned products meet customers' needs and expectations for climate-related coverage, Tryg has conducted a review of relevant climate-related perils associated with the targeted products. This assessment draws on analyses of climaterelated claims covered by Tryg and other relevant insurance schemes - such as the Danish Natural Hazards Council and the Norwegian Natural Perils Pool - as well as insights into customers' actual experiences and expressed concerns regarding climate-related risks.
The evaluation can include claims data, climate risk scenarios, interviews with claims handlers and sales teams, and customer surveys. To remain responsive to evolving needs, Tryg will continue to incorporate relevant customer insights to ensure that future products reflect both current and emerging climate-related demands. Implementation varies across product categories, business units and countries.
Screening criteria 4: Data sharing - Making loss data available to public authorities for the purpose of analytical research.
To support climate adaptation in society, Tryg will, upon request and free of charge, share climate-related claims data with public authorities in Denmark, Norway and Sweden.
In Norway, Tryg together with the non-life insurance industry shares claims data with the Norwegian Knowledge Bank to support civil protection and land-use planning. Additionally, through its partnership with Climate Futures, Tryg shares data and integrates seasonal forecasts and climate simulations into risk

{87}------------------------------------------------
models - enabling proactive customer advice, premium adjustments and contingency planning. The collaboration aims to co-create insights that benefit both Tryg and the wider insurance sector.
Screening criteria 5: High level of service in postdisaster situations - handling climate-related claims fairly with respect to customers.
Across all markets, Tryg has contingency plans in place for both Private and Commercial customers, ready to be activated in response to major claims events linked to various climaterelated risks. Claims handlers at Tryg undergo regular internal training to ensure claims are managed in full compliance with applicable laws, including during large-scale natural disasters. Customer satisfaction - particularly in claims handling - remains a core priority for Tryg. Notably, satisfaction levels have remained consistently high, even during years marked by frequent and severe weather events affecting customers.
Turnover-based share of insurance premiums and investment assets

Insurance premiums Investment assets
Doing no significant harm
Tryg has excluded premium income related to the extraction, storage, transport or manufacture of fossil fuels (coal, oil and gas) and insurance of assets dedicated to these purposes from the Taxonomy alignment numerator. Tryg applies relevant NACE codes to identify such activities, and commercial lines business areas identify and exclude the affected premiums accordingly.
Complying with minimum social safeguards
Tryg follows the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and applies due-diligence processes across operations, suppliers and customers. Tryg maintains strong anti-corruption, tax governance and fair-competition programmes with annual risk assessments, training and monitoring. There were no convictions in 2025 related to these topics.
Contextual information - calculation method and data
Alignment
Tryg includes only the portion of the premium attributable to climate-related perils - such as cloudbursts, storms, droughts and floods - in the numerator of its Taxonomy-alignment calculations. For multi-risk products, this climate-related share is calculated proportionally based on gross written premiums. In cases where product-level data is insufficient to accurately identify and document the climate-related premium, the amount is classified as 'non-eligible'.
This methodology was introduced for the 2024 reporting year and remains in use following clarifications issued by the European Commission.
Eligibility
Tryg considers premiums as eligible only when climate-related coverage is explicitly included in the product and can be reliably documented either in full or proportionally. As a conservative precaution, and due to limitations in data
extraction and documentation across various lines of business, Tryg's eligibility figure currently reflects only the aligned premiums, for which sufficient and verifiable documentation is available, excluding DNSH-related premiums.

Voluntary information:
Strategy 2027: Supporting customers in adapting to climate change
As part of Tryg's Strategy 2027, Tryg has set a target for the number of Taxonomy-aligned product categories* . Private and Commercial in Denmark, Norway and Sweden is committed to aligning relevant products with the EU Taxonomy criteria for climate adaptation. The target is to align 30 product categories by 2027, representing approximately 60% of all relevant product categories in Tryg.
The ambition goes beyond Taxonomy compliance, as it is essential for Tryg that these products not only meet regulatory criteria but also help customers actively adapt to climate change. This includes clearly communicating the benefits - such as prevention incentives - and encouraging customers to install effective preventive solutions, so more people can reduce the risk of climaterelated claims and enjoy peace-of-mind.
Read more about Tryg's 2027 strategy on page 54.
*Since the assessment of a product's compliance with the EU's five technical screening criteria is conducted holistically and primarily at the product level, Tryg sets and measures its targets within product categories. A product category is defined as one or more insurance products covering the same object, such as a house. Tryg counts product categories per business unit and country —meaning, for example, the 'House/Villa' category is counted three times, once for each country where it is offered.
{88}------------------------------------------------
Investment assets
Taxonomy-aligned investments
Tryg manages a substantial portfolio of investment assets using a combination of inhouse management and external asset managers. The investment strategy is rooted in responsible principles aligned with the UN Global Compact, with a strong focus on stability and transparency. The majority of the portfolio is invested in Scandinavian covered bonds, which are considered low-risk and wellregulated instruments.
Economic activities related to Tryg's total investment assets have been categorised according to the EU Climate Delegated Act, including Annexes I and II, as they may contribute to climate change mitigation and/or adaptation. The methodology and data sources used for KPI calculations are described in the relevant documentation.
Covered bonds
Taxonomy eligibility is assessed using NACE codes from the EU Taxonomy Compass. Currently, there is insufficient data to determine alignment, and eligible exposures are conservatively assumed to be non-aligned. A portion of the holdings includes green bonds, which are only considered Taxonomy-aligned if they meet eligibility criteria based on NACE code screening.
Sovereign, supranational and agency bonds
These assets are excluded from Taxonomy KPI calculations. Some holdings include green bonds, but they are also conservatively assumed to be non-aligned due to current data limitations.
Derivatives
The portfolio includes primarily fixed-income derivatives. These instruments are not included in the Taxonomy KPI calculations.
Real estate
Real estate exposures are held through investment funds. Fund-reported data is used to assess Taxonomy alignment, and all fund exposures are considered fully Taxonomy eligible.
Other unlisted exposures
Aside from the abovementioned, Tryg has limited exposure to other unlisted investments. Where applicable, fund-reported data is used to assess Taxonomy alignment. Due to the limited size of these holdings, they have an immaterial impact on overall KPI calculations.
Total Taxonomy-alignment - Investment activities
Proportion of Tryg's insurance and reinsurance investments that are Taxonomy-aligned relative to total investments.
2025
% DKK
The weighted average value of all the investments of insurance or reinsurance undertakings that are directed at funding, or are associated with Taxonomy-aligned economic activities relative to the value of total assets covered by the KPI, with following weights for investments in undertakings per below:
| Turnover-based: | Turnover-based: |
|---|---|
| 0.70 | 392,031,886 |
| Capital expenditures-based: | Capital expenditures-based: |
Assets covered by the KPI relative to total investments of insurance or reinsurance undertakings (total AuM). Excluding investments in sovereign entities.
| Coverage ratio: | Coverage: |
|---|---|
| 92.59 | 55,684,535,496 |

{89}------------------------------------------------
Additional complementary disclosures - investment assets
| Breakdown of denominator of the KPI | |
|---|---|
| 2025 | |
| % | DKK |
| The percentage of derivatives relative to total assets covered by the KPI. | The value in monetary amounts of derivatives |
| 0 | 0 |
| Theproportionofexposurestofinancialandnon-financialundertakingsnotsubjecttoArticles19aand29aof | Valueofexposurestofinancialandnon-financialundertakingsnotsubjecttoArticles19aand29aofDirective |
| Directive2013/34/EUovertotalassetscoveredbytheKPI. | 2013/34/EU. |
| For non-financial undertakings: | For non-financial undertakings: |
| 7.43 | 4,134,711,681 |
| For financial undertakings: | For financial undertakings: |
| 92.57 | 51,549,823,815 |
| Theproportionofexposurestofinancialandnon-financialundertakingsfromnon-EUcountriesnotsubjecttoArticles19aand29aofDirective2013/34/EUovertotalassetscoveredbytheKPI. | Valueofexposurestofinancialandnon-financialundertakingsfromnon-EUcountriesnotsubjecttoArticles19aand29aofDirective2013/34/EU. |
| For non-financial undertakings: | For non-financial undertakings: |
| 3.92 | 2,184,904,017 |
| For financial undertakings: | For financial undertakings: |
| 14.19 | 7,899,303,424 |
| Theproportionofexposurestofinancialandnon-financialundertakingssubjecttoArticles19aand29aofDirective2013/34/EUovertotalassetscoveredbytheKPI.Non-financial undertakings: | Valueofexposurestofinancialandnon-financialundertakingssubjecttoArticles19aand29aofDirective2013/34/EU.Non-financial undertakings: |
| 0 | 0 |
| Financial undertakings: | Financial undertakings: |
| 0 | 0 |
| The proportion of exposures to other counterparties and assets over total assets covered by the KPI.0 | Value of exposures to other counterparties and assets over total assets covered by the KPI.0 |
| The proportion of the insurance or reinsurance undertaking's investments other than investments held inrespect of life insurance contracts where the investment risk is borne by the policy holders, that are directed atfunding, or are associated with, Taxonomy-aligned economic activities.0.69 | Value of the insurance or reinsurance undertaking's investments other than investments held in respect of lifeinsurance contracts where the investment risk is borne by the policy holders, that are directed at funding, or areassociated with, Taxonomy-aligned economic activities.385,136,756 |
| The value of all the investments that are funding economic activities that are not Taxonomy-eligible relative tothe value of total assets covered by the KPI. | Value of all the investments that are funding economic activities that are not Taxonomy-eligible. |
| 94.37 | 52,551,595,262 |
| The value of all the investments that are funding Taxonomy-eligible economic activities, but not Taxonomyaligned relative to the value of total assets covered by the KPI.4.92 | Value of all the investments that are funding Taxonomy-eligible economic activities, but not Taxonomy-alignedrelative to the value of total assets covered by the KPI.2,740,908,348 |
{90}------------------------------------------------
Additional complementary disclosures - investment assets
Breakdown of numerator of the KPI
| 2025 |
|---|
| ------ |
| % | DKK |
|---|---|
| TheproportionofTaxonomy-alignedexposurestofinancialandnon-financialundertakingssubjecttoArticles19aand29aofDirective2013/34/EUovertotalassetscoveredbytheKPI. | ValueofTaxonomy-alignedexposurestofinancialandnon-financialundertakingssubjecttoArticles19aand29aofDirective2013/34/EU. |
| For non-financial undertakings: | For non-financial undertakings: |
| Turnover-based: | Turnover-based: |
| 0 | 0 |
| Capital expenditures-based: | Capital expenditures-based: |
| 0 | 0 |
| For financial undertakings: | For financial undertakings: |
| Turnover-based: | Turnover-based: |
| 0 | 0 |
| Capital expenditures-based: | Capital expenditures-based: |
| 0 | 0 |
| The proportion of the insurance or reinsurance undertaking's investments other than investments held inrespectoflifeinsurancecontractswheretheinvestmentriskisbornebythepolicyholders,thataredirectedatfunding, or are associated with, Taxonomy-aligned. | Value of insurance or reinsurance undertaking's investments other than investments held in respect of lifeinsurancecontractswheretheinvestmentriskisbornebythepolicyholders,thataredirectedatfunding,orareassociated with, Taxonomy-aligned. |
| Turnover-based: | Turnover-based: |
| 0.69 | 385,136,756 |
| Capital expenditure-based: | Capital expenditure-based: |
| 0.69 | 385,136,756 |
| TheproportionofTaxonomy-alignedexposurestoothercounterpartiesandassetsinovertotalassetscoveredby the KPI. | ValueofTaxonomy-alignedexposurestoothercounterpartiesandassetsinovertotalassetscoveredbytheKPI. |
| Turnover-based: | Turnover-based: |
| 0 | 0 |
| Capital expenditure-based: | Capital expenditure-based: |
{91}------------------------------------------------
Breakdown of the numerator of the KPI per environmental objective Nuclear- and fossil gas-related activities (Appendix XII)
Taxonomy-aligned activities
Provided 'do-no-significant-harm' (DNSH) and social safeguards positive assessment
2025
| % | % | % | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transitional activities: | |||||||
| (1) Climate change mitigation | Turnover: | 0.70 Turnover | 0.62 CapEx | 0.62 | |||
| CapEx: | 0.70 Enabling activities: | ||||||
| Turnover | 0.70 CapEx | 0.70 | |||||
| Transitional activities: | |||||||
| Turnover: | 0.62 Turnover | 0 | CapEx | 0 | |||
| (2) Climate change adaptation | CapEx: | 0.62 Enabling activities: | |||||
| Turnover | 0.62 CapEx | 0.62 |
Nuclear energy related activities
2025
Nuclear energy related activities
| 1 | The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to research, development,demonstration and deployment of innovative electricity generation facilities thatproduce energy from nuclear processes with minimal waste from the fuel cycle. | NO |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction and safeoperation of new nuclear installations to produce electricity or processheat,including for the purposes of district heating or industrial processes such ashydrogen production, as well as their safety upgrades, using best availabletechnologies. | NO |
| 3 | The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to safe operation of existingnuclear installations that produce electricity or process heat, including for thepurposes of district heating or industrial processes such as hydrogen productionfrom nuclear energy, as well as their safety upgrades. | NO |
Fossil gas related activities
| 4 | The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction or operationof electricity generation facilities that produce electricity using fossil gaseousfuels. | NO |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction,refurbishment, and operation of combined heat/cool and power generationfacilities using fossil gaseous fuels. | NO |
| 6 | The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction,refurbishment and operation of heat generation facilities that produce heat/coolusing fossil gaseous fuels. | NO |
Contextual information
The investment portfolio consists mainly of Nordic covered bonds and a limited exposure to real estate. Accordingly, the portfolio does not contain investments in economic activities related to nuclear energy or fossil gas as defined under the EU Taxonomy.
{92}------------------------------------------------
Social
Tryg aims to offer a working environment where every employee can thrive and be tryg1 as they are. Diversity, equity and inclusion are central to being able to attract, retain and develop employees to fulfil Tryg's obligation to its customers and help protect them against unforeseen events.
Social highlights Own workforce
• Diversity, equity and inclusion
Consumers and end-users
- Protecting customers against unforeseen events
- Protecting personal data

{93}------------------------------------------------
Social highlights
Gender representation
34/66 gender (female/male) representation in Top management, representing an increase of two percentage points relative to 2024.
Resource groups to enhance inclusion
Internal employee resource groups focusing on increasing internal awareness and understanding of LGBTQ+, invisible disabilities and ethnic minorities.
High level of employee engagement
Employee engagement score of 79. Two-point increase compared to last year, and well above the industry benchmark of 76.
Mastering own health
Tryg continues to expand its focus on prevention for health-related products related to e.g. psychological treatment, recovering from long-term illness, or pregnancy.
Cyber awareness
Tryg participates in the initiative "Hele Danmark øver" to help increase societal awareness around the risks and implications related to cyber attacks.
Local social initiatives
Strong local engagement and partnerships across Denmark, Norway and Sweden through e.g. the lifebuoy scheme supporting water safety, the Night Owls supporting safety for young people out to enjoy the nightlife and Bris, which focuses on young people's mental health.
{94}------------------------------------------------
Own workforce
Material impacts, risks and opportunities
For the standard 'Own workforce', two material IROs are identified: Two negative impacts. One potential impact related to diversity, equity and inclusion, and one actual impact related to gender pay equality.
Efforts include establishing an adequate data foundation and understanding the mechanisms behind gender pay equality.
Negative impacts
Diversity, equity and inclusion
Tryg can negatively impact its employees' right and feeling of inclusion if it does not ensure that appropriate measures and structures are in place to facilitate and promote diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) across the organisation. This can also give rise to challenges in terms of attracting and retaining employees and of ensuring a complementary set of skills and competences. DEI is recognised as one of Tryg's core values, and as a central tool for bringing the full pool of talent into play.
Gender pay equality
Identified as an actual impact, Tryg recognises that gender pay inequality does exist in the organisation, but is also aware that it is a systemic issue requiring a variety of measures in order to address the complex underlying causes. The pay gap is not limited to specific groups of employees.
Tryg has for many years been dedicated to creating a workplace with a focus on diversity, equity and inclusion. In previous years, a number of initiatives have been launched to help promote the overall DEI agenda, thereby also pushing towards more equal representation and pay between men and women.

{95}------------------------------------------------
Policies related to own workforce
Feeling safe, secure and protected is part of Tryg's DNA - and embedded in its name. Under the tagline 'Tryg as you are', Tryg strives for a company culture where everyone feels equally included and is comfortable being their true self, thereby releasing their full potential.
Five policies establish guidelines and procedures for creating an inclusive and engaging workplace. Each applies to all employees in Tryg and are approved annually by the Supervisory Board.
Sustainability policy (link)
Human and labour rights policy (link) Policy on gender balance in management (link) Tryg's Code of Conduct (CoC) (link) Tryg's remuneration policy (link)
Common to these is Tryg's commitment to human and labour rights. The CoC further describes how employees are expected to actively contribute to promoting equal opportunities and refrain from discrimination of any kind. Managers carry an additional responsibility in terms of acting as role models and taking action against inappropriate behaviour.
Gender diversity
Specifically for gender diversity, Tryg's gender balance policy describes the long-term objectives of achieving equal representation across genders at all levels of management. It also focuses on promoting equal pay and equal opportunities for women and men performing the same job or a job of the same value. Further to this, Tryg's remuneration policy is genderneutral with all employees enjoying equal rights regardless of gender.
Process for engaging with own workforce
Engagement with and remediation for workforce on human and labour rights
Tryg continuously assesses relevant data and insights, such as employee cases raised and the outcome of the employee engagement and pulse surveys, as part of its due diligence to identify actual and potential adverse impacts on employees.
Employee engagement survey
Employee feedback is critical for Tryg to create and ensure a working environment focused on engagement, motivation and wellbeing. During the year, Tryg conducts an employee engagement survey and a shorter pulse survey to enable employee feedback and dialogues around areas of improvement.
The survey covers themes such as motivation, management, team collaboration, working conditions, payment, terms of employment, and training and development. Specific questions cover employee exposure to harassment or offensive behaviour. The survey also includes specific questions about the employees' perception of feeling safe and included. Similar to previous years, these questions received the highest scores across all categories.
A formal process for team discussions and follow-up plans is in place to ensure that the insights feed into actions.
The HR function is responsible for conducting the engagement survey and managers are responsible for following up.
The result of the 2025 survey showed an increase in the level of engagement to 79 out of 100 - above the Nordic industry benchmark of 76. This is an increase of two points since 2024 and considered a strong score for a company of Tryg's size. With change a fundamental condition in the markets that Tryg operates in, it is satisfying to see the level of engagement increase, indicating a healthy organisation.
In addition to the employee engagement survey and the pulse survey, employees have two formal conversations during the year and ongoing dialogue with their leader focusing on performance, development and engagement.
Specifically focusing on diversity, equity and inclusion, Tryg has entered into a pro bono agreement with an external consultancy and think tank, Equalis. The partnership includes an inclusion survey sent to employees once a year with the purpose of making DEI actionable and measurable.
The results of the 2025 survey showed that Tryg already has a strong foundation in terms of efforts to advance the DEI agenda, but they also highlighted the areas in which improvements can be made. These were gathered in an action plan that guided efforts throughout the year.
To ensure that Tryg provides the best possible physical working environment, a survey has been conducted for the purpose of gathering input and feedback on areas of improvement. This is one of the elements in Tryg's focus on employee wellbeing.
Engagement with trade unions
To facilitate dialogues with trade unions, Tryg has works councils in place at a national level composed of local management representatives, HR leadership and employee representatives. A Nordic Communication Committee ensures alignment and Executive Board representation. The purpose of the committees is to promote mutual understanding and acceptance through open
dialogue and information exchange across the organisation at quarterly meetings or more frequent interactions or negotiations.
Remediation process
Employees at Tryg can at any time raise concerns with their direct manager, staff representative, occupational health and safety representative, HR or, alternatively, use Tryg's anonymous whistleblower mechanism. Tryg generally encourages and aims for any potential disputes to be handled by the manager, the manager's manager, or with the help of HR. Employees also have the option of involving a workers' representative.
Tryg's CoC explicitly addresses how every employee is expected to report any concerns about non-compliant conduct, or actual or suspected lack of respect for human and labour rights, to their direct manager, HR or Group compliance or through the whistleblower scheme, if applicable.
Read more about Tryg's whistleblower mechanism and Code of Conduct on pages 113 - 114.
{96}------------------------------------------------
Taking actions on material impacts on own workforce
Diversity, equity and inclusion are part of Tryg's DNA and a number of specific initiatives are in place to further DEI efforts across the organisation.
An internal DEI portal, available in all local languages, provides employees with information on Tryg's internal DEI efforts and explains how they can engage in this work and participate in existing or create new employee resource groups.
During the year, DEI as a topic has been promoted and paid attention to in several ways as a natural part of Tryg's processes. For example, DEI training and workshops were part of the summit for Swedish leaders. In Norway, Tryg's Next step programme, a young talent programme, conducted case studies on DEIrelated topics and, in Denmark, a big Ramadan dinner was hosted at the main office in Ballerup for all employees who wanted to attend.
In 2025, Tryg also increased its internal focus on employee wellbeing, a topic closely linked to DEI. A comprehensive internal wellbeing portal has been established, and wellbeing webinars on physical, mental and relational health have been hosted in all countries. To activate employees, Tryg also marked World Mental Health Day in October with internal articles, including a reminder of the resources and tools available for employees to take active steps to
Employee resource groups to foster inclusion and understanding
Understanding is key to creating an inclusive workplace with a diverse representation of gender, age, sexual orientation, ethnic origin, health status, disabilities, political opinion, religious beliefs or other facets or needs. To facilitate this, Tryg has four employee-led internal resource groups: the Rainbow network in Denmark, focusing on LGBTQ+ rights; the
ensure their wellbeing.
Sweden; a newly started network focusing on ethnic minority colleagues. The networks are open to all employees. Common to the resource groups is a dedicated purpose to share insights, create engagement and ultimately a workplace where everyone is comfortable being their true self. LGBTQ+ rights
Sunflower network, focusing on invisible disabilities and present both in Denmark and
Tryg continues its work to create equal opportunities and an inclusive working environment for LGBTQ+ individuals. Pride month is celebrated and acknowledged across Denmark, Norway and Sweden through internal activities and communication.
In 2025, as the first company in Denmark, Tryg received a rainbow certificate from the organisation LGBT+ in Denmark. The purpose of the certificate is to ensure the wellbeing of LGBT+ individuals in the labour market and to motivate companies to take concrete steps towards better inclusion.
Tryg's Rainbow network works to advance inclusion by creating a forum for discussing and engaging around LGBTQ+ employees' conditions and wellbeing.
The network is both for employees who identify as LGBTQ+ and employees who act as allies, which is the exact purpose: creating an inclusive and safe working environment based on collective efforts – and here, allied colleagues play a crucial role. The network meets every quarter to discuss specific conditions or barriers that LGBTQ+ persons might face in the workplace and suggestions for activities to remedy these. In connection with international Pride month, the network is active in co-hosting
events together with Tryg to further shed light, educate and involve colleagues in the agenda.
Voluntary task forces are established within the Rainbow network, uniting passionate LGBTQ+ individuals and allies to address challenges and drive positive change within the LGBTQ+ community and workplace. Among these initiatives are planning and coordinating activities during Pride week and Pride parades in Copenhagen and Bergen; identifying and working on initiatives that supports the LGBTQ+ community, such as pronouns in email signatures, gender-neutral restrooms, policies, practices and physical environments to create a safe and supportive atmosphere; planning and organising events such as educational / inspirational sessions and social gatherings; and being the go-to-persons for the organisations on all topics relating to the LGBTQ+ community. In Denmark, the Rainbow network visited all the Danish offices and hosted a LGBTQ+-webinar for our leaders.
"Diversity is about the representation. Belonging is the end goal. At Tryg, we want everyone to be Tryg just the way you are."
{97}------------------------------------------------
Making the invisible visible
With the purpose of making the invisible visible, Tryg supports the Hidden Disabilities Programme, which is an international programme working to ensure the inclusion of people with invisible disabilities and special needs.
Living with an invisible disability can make everyday life demanding, and other people can have difficulties understanding and accommodating the challenges, as they cannot be seen. Invisible disabilities include neurodiversity, mental illness, chronic pain or anxiety, or visual, voice or hearing impairment.
For customers, a special hidden disabilities Sunflower phone line has been created to support those with special needs. All customerfacing employees have been trained to answer 'Sunflower' calls, where the caller might need more patience, extended explanations or emotional support. Employees and guests visiting Tryg's Danish offices can choose to wear the hidden disabilities Sunflower lanyard to signal that they might need help, support, patience or more time.
Several internal efforts have been undertaken in order to increase knowledge of invisible disabilities. In Sweden, an information session on neurodiversity has been offered to all employees, and all leaders have been invited to a deep-dive on how to lead neurodiverse employees. In Denmark, a webinar was hosted on how to support colleagues with invisible disabilities, such as anxiety or PTSD.
Internal Tryg Sunflower employee resource groups enable employees to engage in the topic and discuss how Tryg can create the most suitable conditions for all. It can be difficult to fully understand the challenges that colleagues
with invisible disabilities face, which can lead to structures or behaviour that are not inclusive or where people do not feel safe. The networks can help Tryg identify blind spots where further action is needed in order to ensure optimal conditions and wellbeing for all employees. There is a network both in Denmark and Sweden and they meet approximately every other month.
Ethnic minorities
A new employee-led network focusing on colleagues with ethnic minority backgrounds was established in 2025. Similar to the other internal networks, the purpose is to to create awareness and understanding of how to increase inclusion and a sense of belonging for employees with different backgrounds.
Gender diversity at management level
Tryg continues its focus on identifying and developing a strong pipeline of female leaders and managers.
The efforts cut across numerous initiatives focusing on both internal processes as well as on altering some of the structural issues that can potentially be an obstacle to equal representation and pay.
Among the initiatives in place is a focus on avoiding unconscious bias in, for example, recruitment, succession plans and talent reviews by continuously building internal capacity and awareness of the issue. This also entails external candidate searches for management positions in cases where the level of diversity in the pool of applicants is too limited. All recruitment partners are trained in ensuring inclusion and minimising bias in the recruitment process. In Denmark, Tryg has a stringent recruitment and approval process in place when recruiting for leadership positions to ensure a diverse and gender-balanced population. On a more structural level, Tryg continues to offer equal conditions of maternity / paternity leave for women, men and co-parents.
Diverse management teams
Tryg also focuses on actively promoting diversity across management teams. A management team is considered diverse when it has a minimum of two out of the following three parameters: Gender, age and experience. The latter means that Tryg distinguishes between, and values experience from, both insurance and other sectors.
Focus on mitigating gender pay gap
Tryg continues its work to improve data and analyses to better understand where there might be differences as well as their respective root causes. This includes preparations for the EU pay transparency directive that will come into effect in June 2026.
Tryg's job architecture with regards to job levels and salary bands represents an important stepping stone in this regard. Continuing efforts to further refine the job architecture to also distinguish between job families and functions will underpin development going forward.
The job levels are defined by impact and value to the company as well as complexity and degree of responsibility – and not based on the specific person currently holding the position. This way of working will enable Tryg to increase fairness and transparency, as salary packages will be based on the role and level of an employee as well as internal and external benchmarks. The job architecture also provides a clear structure and governance for the job levels and salary packages tied to these. Tryg has completed an audit of existing salary

{98}------------------------------------------------
packages, ensuring alignment and compliance with the job architecture governance and thus eliminating hidden salary differences.
As part of the annual salary reviews, leaders are trained to improve their ability to make fair and objective decisions on salary development.
Allocation of resources
Tryg's HR department has operational responsibility for ensuring adequate measures for employee-related impacts. One person has dedicated responsibility for advancing the DEI agenda across Tryg. In practice, responsibility and resource use for operationalising the targets and ambitions is decentralised across the organisation.
Targets
Management level
To guide its efforts, Tryg has defined targets across the different levels of management.
Tryg follows market practice and defines gender balance as when neither women nor men have a representation of less than 40%. The target covers all levels of management across the organisation with the primary focus being on the most senior levels as these currently have the lowest female representation. By focusing on gender proportionality across the different management levels, the aspiration is to ensure that relevant and necessary measures are in place to be able to advance female leaders internally. The table shows the targets for 2030.
The strategic targets are monitored on a quarterly basis by the Supervisory Board and shared with the Works Council.
Specifically for Tryg A/S, a 2026 target for 'Other management levels' is defined according to the legal requirements of the Gender Balance Act.
The new regulation only applies to Tryg A/S - the Holding company, which has a very small employee base.
Supervisory Board level
Pursuant to section 4 of the Danish Gender Balance Act, gender balance must be reached at the Supervisory Board.
For shareholder-elected members, gender balance is reached with four members of one gender and six of the other. Tryg currently has three women and seven men.
For employee-elected members, gender balance requires at least two members of one gender and three of the other. The current division is four women and one man.
Tryg will continue its efforts to ensure gender representation across the Supervisory Board towards 30 June 2026.
Social targets
Description of developments and accounting policies are covered under S1-9 (management levels) on page 102 and Corporate Governance (Supervisory Board).
| Social | Base year | Targets | Progress | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strategic targets | 2025 | 2024 | 2027 | 2030 | ||
| % | % | % | % | |||
| All management levels | ||||||
| Male | 59 | 57 | N/A | 60 | ||
| Female | 41 | 43 | N/A | 40 | ||
| Director | ||||||
| Empowering people | Male | 64 | 65 | N/A | 60 | |
| Female | 36 | 35 | N/A | 40 | ||
| Top management | ||||||
| Male | 66 | 68 | N/A | 60 | ||
| Female | 34 | 32 | N/A | 40 |
Foundational targets 30-06-2026
| Number | Number | Number | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supervisory Board:Gender diversity ratio, shareholder-electedMaleFemale | 73 | 63 | 64 | N/AN/A | ||
| Supervisory Board:Gender diversity ratio, employee-elected | ||||||
| Legal requirementsa) | Male | 1 | 1 | 3 | N/A | |
| Female | 4 | 4 | 2 | N/A | ||
| Other levels of management:Gender diversity ratio, Tryg A/S | ||||||
| Male | 5 | 5 | 4 | N/A | ||
| Female | 1 | 1 | 2 | N/A |
Progress on target Progress below target
{99}------------------------------------------------
Characteristics of own workforce
| 2025 | 2024 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESRS ID | Number | % | Number | % |
| Employees in own workforce | ||||
| S1-6_02Number of employees | 7,794 | 7,587 | ||
| S1-6_02Total gender distribution | ||||
| Male | 4,251 | 55 | 4,087 | 54 |
| Female | 3,540 | 45 | 3,499 | 46 |
| Others | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Not reported | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| S1-6_05Country distribution | ||||
| Denmark | 3,781 | 3,743 | ||
| Norway | 1,520 | 1,492 | ||
| Sweden | 2,420 | 2,352 | ||
| Others | 73 | N/A | ||
| Non-employee workers in own workforce S1-7 | ||||
| S1-7_02Non-employee workers in the own workforce | 3,326 | 2,804 |
Employment types and gender
| 2025 | Female | Male | Other | Not reported | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESRS ID | ||||||
| S1-6_09 | Number of employees | 3,540 | 4,251 | 0 | 3 | 7,794 |
| S1-6_09 | Number of permanent employees | 3,181 | 3,832 | 0 | 3 | 7,016 |
| S1-6_09 | Number of temporary employees | 71 | 67 | 0 | 0 | 138 |
| S1-6_09 | Number of non-guaranteed hours employees | 288 | 352 | 0 | 0 | 640 |
| 2024 | ||||||
| ESRS ID | ||||||
| S1-6_09 | Number of employees | 3,499 | 4,087 | 0 | 1 | 7,587 |
| S1-6_09 | Number of permanent employees | 3,102 | 3,648 | 0 | 1 | 6,751 |
| S1-6_09 | Number of temporary employees | 74 | 89 | 0 | 0 | 163 |
| S1-6_09 | Number of non-guaranteed hours employees | 323 | 350 | 0 | 0 | 673 |
Developments employment types
The number of employees remain steady with no significant variation.
The number of temporary employees has decreased as a result of organisational changes and restructuring, in particularly the expansion of the partnership with TCS taking over the operation of a number of Tryg's existing IT solutions. This has also impacted the number of nonguaranteed hourly paid employees and non-employees.
Accounting policies
Characteristics of own workforce S1-6
Employee numbers are presented as headcount figures [S1-6_02]. This includes the employment types; permanent, temporary and non-guaranteed hourly paid employees. The figures represent the average monthly headcount for the reporting period, calculated at the end of each month. The employees are divided by gender and country. The gender distribution is split into male, female, not reported and others in the organisation, and also reported as respective ratios. Gender is specified by the employees themselves [S1-6_02]. The country distribution is split into the main countries of operation: Denmark, Norway, Sweden and others. Others are represented by Tryg Trade [S1-6_05].
Non-employee workers in own workforce S1-7
Non-employee workers are people not employed or salaried by Tryg. They are reported as a headcount, following the same method as described above. The employment type 'External' is used for registering non-employee workers who have either a direct contract with Tryg to supply labour or are employees that are supplied by third-party companies (classified under NACE Code N78) [S1-7_02].
Employment types and gender S1-6
The workforce is split into the following employment types: permanent, temporary and nonguaranteed hourly paid employees, divided by gender [S1-6_09, AR 55 T3].
{100}------------------------------------------------
Introduction
2025
2024
Employee turnover
| 2025 | 2024 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESRS ID | Number | % | Number | % |
| Employee turnover S1-6 | ||||
| S1-6_11 Employees who have left undertaking | 1,339 | 1,730 | ||
| S1-6_12 Employee turnover | 17 | 22 | ||
| Share of voluntary leavers (of turnover rate) | 10 | 12 | ||
| Share of involuntary leavers (of turnover rate) | 5 | 8 |
Strategy
Developments employee turnover
The employee turnover rate decreased from previous year. Organisational changes and restructuring of the IT organisation impact the 2025 figures.
Collective bargaining coverage and social dialogue
| ) | 2024 |
|---|---|
| % | % |
| 93 | 93 |
| 89 | 88 |
| 96 | 94 |
| 100 | 100 |
| 89 | 88 |
| 96 | 94 |
| 100 | 100 |
| 100 |
| 2025 | Collective bargaining coverage | Social dialogue |
|---|---|---|
| CoverageRate | Employees – EEA | Workplace representation (EEA only) |
| Denmark | Denmark | |
| 80-100% | Norway | Norway |
| Sweden | Sweden |
Developments collective bargaining
The development is stable compared to previous year, emphasising the strong representation of collective bargaining and social dialogue across Tryg.
Accounting policies
Employee turnover S1-6
Employees who have left Tryg include both voluntary and involuntary leavers. The share of leavers within the year is calculated by dividing the number of, respectively, voluntary and involuntary leavers by the average total headcount. The number covers all employees, including temporary and non-guaranteed hourly paid employees [S1-6_11]. Employee turnover rate is based on the total share of employees leaving within the year divided by the average headcount during the financial year. The number covers all employees, including temporary and non-guaranteed hourly paid employees [S1-6_12].
Collective bargaining coverage and social dialogue S1-8
Employees that have a collective bargaining agreement are divided by headcount per country excluding other countries than Denmark, Norway and Sweden [S1-8_01]. There is a total of seven different collective bargaining agreements across Tryg. The percentage of employees covered by workers' representatives is split by country due to different legislation across Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Tryg does not have employees outside of the EEA [S1-8_06, AR70_T1].
{101}------------------------------------------------
Diversity metric: Gender distribution at management levels
| 2025 | 2024 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESRS ID | Number | % | Number | % |
| Gender distribution, all management levels - Tryg Group | ||||
| Male | 415 | 59 | 432 | 57 |
| Female | 285 | 41 | 332 | 43 |
| Others | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Not reported | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gender distribution, director level - Tryg Group | ||||
| Male | 189 | 64 | 199 | 64 |
| Female | 108 | 36 | 112 | 36 |
| Others | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Not reported | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| S1-9_02Gender distribution, top management level - Tryg Group | ||||
| Male | 52 | 66 | 61 | 68 |
| Female | 27 | 34 | 29 | 32 |
| Others | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Not reported | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gender distribution, other levels of management - Tryg Group | ||||
| Male | 24 | 69 | 25 | 71 |
| Female | 11 | 31 | 10 | 29 |
| Others | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Not reported | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gender distribution, other levels of management - Tryg A/Sa) | ||||
| Male | 5 | 83 | 5 | 83 |
| Female | 1 | 17 | 1 | 17 |
**a)**The numbers are in accordance with the Gender Balance Act (LOV nr. 1602 af 17/12/2024), where gender is defined as female and male. Target for 30 June 2026.
Developments gender distribution
All management levels: As a result of changes to definition, there is a general decrease in the number of manager and a bit more for female leaders. However, still maintaining gender representation with 41% women.
Director level: The level of gender diversity remains stable.
Top management level: Two percentage points improvement in the share of women driven by general ongoing efforts and focus on gender balance at higher management levels.
Other levels of management, Tryg Group: The share of women increases as a result of the general focus on gender balance at higher management levels.
Other levels of management, Tryg A/S: This group is only composed by members of the Executive Board and one other person. This is the first year of reporting according to the Danish Gender Balance Act. There has been no development compared to 2024.
Accounting policies
Gender distribution, all management levels
The reported figure on gender composition of employees across all management levels is based on a headcount of individuals who held a management role during the final month of the reporting period at year-end. To be included, a manager must be classified as an active employee with an employment type of either permanent or temporary. The indicator covers Tryg's four levels of management.
Gender distribution, director, top management and other levels of management - Tryg Group
Gender distribution at the second management level, the director level, is based on job level or role. The gender distribution at top management level covers the upper level in Tryg called 'Top management', consisting of 'Senior Vice President', 'Vice President' and 'Executive Board' [S1-9_02]. Other levels of management for Tryg Group follows the definition of the Danish Companies Act: Two tiers below the Supervisory Board (see definition below).
Gender distribution, other levels of management - Tryg A/S
The gender distribution for other levels of management levels is reported in absolute numbers and in accordance with the Danish Gender Balance Act (Act No. 1602 of 17 December 2024), which defines gender as female or male. Reporting is conducted at the company level for Tryg A/S, not at the Group level. 'Other levels of management' are defined according to Section 139c of the Danish Companies Act and refer to two tiers below the Supervisory Board: First level is the Executive Board and individuals who are organisationally at the same level as the Executive Board. The second level is managers with staff responsibilities reporting directly to members of the Executive Board.
{102}------------------------------------------------
Diversity metric: Employee age groups
| 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|
| ESRS ID | % | % |
| S1-9_03Employees, under 30 years | 26 | 26 |
| S1-9_04Employees, 30-49 years | 50 | 49 |
| S1-9_05Employees, 50 years and above | 24 | 25 |
Developments employee age groups
No signification deviations across age splits.
Training and skills development
| 2025 | 2024 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESRS ID | Number | % | Number | % | |
| S1-13_01 | Employees who participated in regular performance and careerdevelopment | 46 | 60 | ||
| S1-13_02 | Employees who participated in regular performance and careerdevelopment by gender | ||||
| Male | 1,871 | 2,414 | |||
| Female | 1,689 | 2,120 | |||
| Others | 0 | 0 | |||
| Not reported | 2 | 0 | |||
| S1-13_04 | Average employee training hours per person | 3 | 3 | ||
| S1-13_04 | Average employee training hours by gender | ||||
| Male | 3 | 3 | |||
| Female | 3 | 3 | |||
| Others | 0 | 0 | |||
| Not reported | 0 | 0 |
Developments
The decrease in the share of employees participated in regular performance and career development in 2025 is due to common practice of creating the goals only in time for the year-end conversations (Q1 2026) and other systems used for goal setting in parts of the organisation. It is common practice to set goals in all parts of the organisation to guide performance.
Accounting policies
Employee age groups S1-9
The employee age groups are calculated at the end of the reporting period and include all headcounts in Tryg [S1-9_03–05].
Training and skills development S1-13
The percentage of employees who have participated in regular performance and career development reviews are divided by the total number of employees (permanent) in Tryg minus employees not in scope for career development and training e.g. students. The performance reviews are conducted annually with a mid-year follow-up session [S1-13_01]. The number of employees who have participated in performance and development reviews is broken down by gender [S1-13_02]. Figures are managed in Tryg's global HR system.
Average employee training hours per person and by gender. The indicator only includes mandatory compliance training. The figure is reported as an average per person and split by gender. The figures are managed in Tryg's three learning platforms [S1-13_03-04].
{103}------------------------------------------------
Pay ratio
| 2025 | 2024 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ESRS ID | % | % | |
| S1-16_01 | Gender pay ratio - Denmark | 12 | 13 |
| S1-16_01 | Gender pay ratio - Norway | 12 | 15 |
| S1-16_01 | Gender pay ratio - Sweden | 8 | 13 |
| Remuneration ratio | |||
| S1-16_02 | Annual total remuneration ratio | 29 | 21 |
Developments pay ratio
There is a minor improvement in the unadjusted gender pay ratio across all three countries. This is a result of an increased focus on pay ranges in the hiring process as well as a generally improved data foundation.
The annual total remuneration ratio increased. There has been a general increase in the median salary of employees. The ratio increase is due to variations in effectuation of pay changes between managers and employees.
Incidents of discrimination
| 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|
| ESRS ID | Number | Number |
| S1-17_02Incidents of discrimination | 9 | 11 |
Developments incidents of discrimination
The number of incidents of discrimination has decreased slightly compared to 2024. Tryg remains dedicated to a zero tolerance towards discrimination and continuously communicate this through employee and leader training.

Accounting policies
Pay ratio S1-16
This indicator measures the average female-male pay gap by calculating the difference between average gross monthly earnings of males and females that are included in the headcount figure, and is expressed as a percentage of the average pay level of male employees. The indicator is split per country excluding other counties than Denmark, Norway and Sweden [S1-16_01]. The total annual remuneration ratio of the highest paid employees to the median annual total remuneration for all employees excludes the highest paid employee [S1-16_02].
Incidents of discrimination S1-17
Discrimination is a collective term for cases of discrimination, bullying, sexual harassment and other types of harassment that can occur at the workplace. Cases are reported to the HR department through leaders, unions, employee representatives or through Tryg's Whistleblower hotline [S1-17_02].
{104}------------------------------------------------

Consumers and end-users
Material impacts, risks and opportunities
For the standard 'Consumers and end-users', three material IROs are identified: One opportunity, one potential negative impact and one risk.
The core of Tryg's societal responsibility is to deliver relevant products and prevention services to help our customers protect their home, their health and their belongings. Data is the focal point for determining risks, setting the right price, identifying preventive measures and handling claims.
Financial opportunity
Insurance as a societal mirror
In its essence, insurance is about providing peace of mind for customers by protecting them against unforeseen events. Responding to new environmental- or social-related risks that might negatively impact its customers is identified as an opportunity for Tryg. Whether those risks relate to climate change, economic instability, cyber threat or health, Tryg works to adapt and develop products to make sure that customers are protected in the best possible way.
Negative impact
Protecting customers' private data
Data is a prerequisite for Tryg to be able to determine risks, set prices and coverage, handle claims and safeguard its business model. Managing a vast amount of data, including sensitive data, comes with a responsibility for ensuring robust, transparent and ethical processes for protecting customers against the systemic risk of of data or privacy breaches. Complying with applicable legislation and
guidelines on the matter is embedded in Tryg's compliance culture - and governance, policies and procedures are in place to guide employees and managers.
Financial risk
Risk of cyber attacks
Closely connected to managing and protecting personal data is a material financial risk related to cyber attacks of any kind against Tryg. Cyber attacks may not only potentially impact Tryg negatively in terms of financial costs but can also impact the operation of the company, negatively impacting customers' claims handling or protection of private information. Tryg has an established compliance setup to ensure strong information security, and it continuously monitors the evolution of the surrounding cyber threat landscape.

{105}------------------------------------------------
To fulfil the purpose of insurance - to provide a financial safety net for customers - Tryg must continuously track market developments to ensure that its product portfolio matches the risks faced by customers and society.
Policies related to product development
Tryg's product approval process works to ensure that its products do not have unfavourable effects for customers, that appropriate measures have been taken to prevent or mitigate any adverse effects on customers, and that the product provides value for the customer. This is particularly relevant when developing products for addressing new societal challenges.
In accordance with the Insurance Distribution Directive's Product Oversight and Governance ("POG") requirements, Tryg has written instructions and formal processes in place, applying to new and significant adaptation of existing products. This specifically includes consideration as to whether the product integrates climate, environmental and social factors. Insurance products are also assessed as to whether they are aligned with the EU Taxonomy regulation or have the potential to become Taxonomy-aligned over time. The instruction is approved annually by the Executive Board's Risk Committee.
Actions to pursue opportunities
Pursuing opportunities related to Tryg's core products centre around more than merely developing insurance products. To increase value for customers, Tryg aims to include preventive measures to the extent possible across its product categories. This can range from offering discounts on the purchase of specific devices and building awareness to offering more efficient claims handling.
Awareness and mitigation of cyber risks
As a financial sector actor, and a company with a strong presence among small- and mediumsized enterprises, Tryg wants to contribute to improving digital security in Denmark. Through initiatives such as the Cyber Security Pact ('Cybersikkerhedspagten'), Tryg aims to help advance understanding and awareness of cyber security. In particular, Tryg helps build the competences and resilience of SMEs by contributing to developing recommendations and guidance around cyber threats.
Additionally, to help create awareness about the implications and risk of cyber attacks, Tryg is an active partner in the national emergency drill 'Hele Danmark øver' (Denmark practices), hosting a drill for more than eighty companies at its headquarter in Ballerup.
As part of its risk advisory for customers, Tryg has a tool that can help SMEs understand the risk and quantify the cost of a cyber attack. Together, these initiatives are intended to help build societal resilience towards cyber risks.
Climate resilient customers
As a response to the increasing frequency of severe weather events, Tryg has a strategic focus on developing products that can help customers adapt to climate change. As described under the EU Taxonomy, climateadapted products include those that provide cover for climate-related hazards and those that offer incentives for prevention, e.g. a reduced premium. As well as making the products available to customers, they must be activated by customers in order to reap the benefits of the preventive measures. The idea is that customers who make the effort and install e.g. a backflow prevention valve, will protect their house from water-related damage. In 2025, Tryg set a baseline for the share of private house
insurance customers in Denmark, Norway and Sweden who have adopted measures to prevent climate- and weather-related claims, enabling better tracking of advice impact and measure effectiveness.
Read more about how Tryg works with climate adaptation and prevention under the sections Climate change and the EU Taxonomy.
Enabling customers to master their own health
Prevention efforts are not only limited to products, but can also be considered in terms of claims handling. This is particularly relevant in terms of health-related claims, where focus is on providing access to the most viable and effective treatments, enabling customers to master their own health.
One example of this in 2025 was the development of targeted treatment for psychological disorders. Customers will most often be offered a combination of physical sessions with a psychologist and access to an online portal with exercises. This is considered the most effective for customers, and can help prevent a relapse later.
Tryg continues to focus on providing relevant health-related products to customers. As part of its pregnancy insurance, Tryg grants customers free access to an online midwife, information, webinars and videos relevant to childbirth, all with the purpose of preparing and supporting soon-to-be parents in their new situation.
Similarly, partnerships are in place for the purpose of helping employees on long-term sick leave return to work by offering targeted treatment, a tailored plan and support during the process.
Accessibility for customers
Tryg in Denmark has established a dedicated Sunflower customer service phone line to handle any special needs that certain groups of customers might have. Customer-facing employees have been trained in answering these calls and understand the need for more patience, extended explanations or emotional support when filing a claim or having to understand insurance terms, etc. The phone line is open every day.
During the year, Trygg-Hansa also established a customer phone line specifically for customers with extra needs.
Tryg is subject to the EU's Accessibility Act, which mandates that companies ensure accessibility to the products and services they sell online.
Accessibility prescribes an optimisation of digital solutions to make sure they are also usable for people with a disability. Specific initiatives include ensuring that content is machine-readable, that the language is clear and understandable, that information is logically structured, that readability in terms of colours, contrasts and fonts is optimal and that any media content is transcribed.
Tryg has assessed all its customer-facing websites to identify areas of improvement. A cross-organisational project group across business areas and countries has executed on the project. It is critical for Tryg to ensure that products, insurance terms and other relevant information are accessible to customers when they need it, and to make the necessary adaptations to improve the customer journey.
{106}------------------------------------------------
Prevention
Preventive measures remain a central aspect of Tryg's delivery to its customers. If done correctly, preventive measures can help save customers the trouble of submitting claims and also help protect them from injury or to recover more quickly.
On a societal level, Tryg plays an active role in preventing accidents and contributing to a society characterised by peace of mind. Since the 1950s, Trygg-Hansa and Tryg Norway have donated more than 150,000 lifebuoys to coastal areas around Norway and Sweden.
Trygg-Hansa has a long-term partnership with Bris ('Children's rights in society'), enabling the organisation to be available 24/7 to children who can call in and talk to an adult. In Norway, Tryg has functioned as the secretariat of the Night Owls organisation since the 1990s.
In Denmark, Tryg teaches school pupils in eighth to tenth grade about personal finances and the importance of budgeting and of having insurance. Through the course 'Understanding Finance' (Fat om Finanserne), Tryg aims to help prevent young people ending up in unfortunate situations without insurance or in financial difficulties. The training courses are run by volunteer Tryg employees.
Examples of prevention efforts focusing on protecting and helping the individual are presented on the right.

Returning safely to work
Tryg in Denmark and Norway offers various services to help employees return to work after long-term illness or recover from an accident. A cross-functional approach and close collaboration with the employee ensure a plan that provides appropriate support at the right pace.

Family help - 'Familjehjälpen'
Included in the child, pregnancy, sickness and accident policies, the service Familjehjälpen in Sweden provides guidance to families who perhaps face illness, accidents, disabilities or other issues where they need support from the public system to create a better life for their family.

CRiskA - preventing accidents
An app developed by SEGES innovation to ensure safe handling of chemicals at work. Available for agricultural customers in Denmark, making it easy to be informed about adequate protection measures.

Building awareness of cyber security
In Norway, Tryg has developed an e-learning course for customers to educate their employees; customers are offered a free counselling session with an external expert in cyber security; and, together with external partners, Tryg has developed a mapping tool for companies to understand their current risk exposure.

The Night Owls - 'Natteravnene'
Voluntary groups of Night Owls walk the streets of local communities in Norway to offer safety and support to young people out to enjoy the night life. Tryg Norway manages the secretariat, provides equipment and hosts an annual conference where the more than 300 voluntary groups meet.

Lifebuoys
The lifebuoy scheme is one of the most iconic symbols of Tryg's mission to prevent accidents. Trygg-Hansa and Tryg Norway have been distributing the lifebuoys for more than 70 years and today more than 150,000 are placed around coastal areas in Scandinavia.
{107}------------------------------------------------
Protecting customers' private data Policies for data protection and information security
Policies for protecting data cut across the interrelated themes Personal data and information security.
Protection of personal data is described in internal instructions and further operationalised in SOPs across the organisation. For data ethics, Tryg refers to the Data Ethical Codex from the Danish trade association Insurance & Pension Denmark covering the three aspects of data ethical practices: Transparency, free choice and data security.
Tryg's Information Security policy describes Tryg's commitment and efforts to protect data and information entrusted to Tryg by customers, suppliers, staff or other partners. The policy is aligned and compatible with financial services industry-recognised Information Security frameworks (e.g. ISO27001:2013, NIST Cyber Security Framework).
The policy represents the framework and sets the direction for Tryg's Information Security governance. It is complemented by specific rules and recommendations that apply to all employees and consultants to ensure that information security is an integral part of Tryg's ways of working. Tryg's appointed Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) has responsibility for overseeing the policy and for facilitating the process for determining the cyber risk appetite to be approved by the Executive Board and Supervisory Board.
The policy applies to all legal entities and business areas within Tryg and is approved annually by the Supervisory Board.
Engagement and process for remediation and raising concerns
Engagement around the potential impact of Tryg's processing of (personal) data is centred on Tryg's information and transparency obligation, which includes clear guidance on relevant complaints channels.
As an insurance company, Tryg is subject to an information obligation under the Executive order on good practice for insurance distributors (BEK no. 1557 of 06/12/2024). This implies an obligation to, for example, be transparent about general information related to the insurance product, its coverage and agreement in a format understandable by the customer. Specifically for personal data, Tryg has an obligation to be transparent about how data is processed. This information is available in the Privacy and cookie notice, which is available on Tryg's websites and referenced in customer letters, online information, etc. to make sure that customers can always access it.
Customers may at any time contact Tryg and complain about Tryg's data processing. Customers may also contact the data protection officer regarding any questions about the processing of their data and the exercise of their rights under GDPR.
Actions for protecting data Information security
To mitigate the potential negative impact and financial risk related to data and cyber security, a range of actions and measures are in place and continuously updated and advanced.
As a financial sector company, Tryg is subject to the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), which prescribes a distinct focus on operational resilience towards severe disruptions caused by cyber security threats. An IT control framework is critical to succeeding with the implementation and is currently being developed and adapted as necessary to ensure compliance with DORA. To drive implementation, Tryg has established an internal programme for addressing the requirements divided across five tracks. Each is progressing according to plan.
Equally important to having a robust control framework, is to ensure that employees are aware of and understand the implications of a potential cyber attack. All employees and management are subject to mandatory annual training on cyber and information security. Additionally, internal bursts ensure awareness about how to spot a cyber attack and how to take adequate measures against it.
In the light of another year marked by geopolitical uncertainty, it remains relevant to be conscious of suppliers and partners and of how and where data is stored. As part of its contingency planning, Tryg has defined exit strategies across suppliers of key systems or solutions where there might be potential uncertainty about future delivery stability. Similarly, there is an explicit focus on ensuring that externally managed data is kept within the European Union.
Tryg collaborates with and shares experiences on data security with the industry and the authorities as part of its memberships of the respective trade associations in Denmark, Norway and Sweden. To the extent possible, Tryg shares threat intelligence to support a high level of information security in the insurance industry and in society. Any data breach is carefully analysed to prevent future breaches.
EU Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA)
Through its five-pillar framework: ICT risk management, incident reporting; digital operational resilience testing; ICT thirdparty risk management; and information sharing, the purpose of DORA is to help companies ensure that they can withstand, respond to and recover from all types of ICT-related disruptions and threats.
Tryg participates in regulatory sandbox
One of the primary areas of concern at present is the interface between data protection and the advanced use of AI. To help establish practice, highlight challenges and support future innovation, Tryg participated in the regulatory sandbox – a project from the Danish Data Protection Agency and the Agency for Digital Government.
Tryg was of the two companies selected from among applicants to test their respective AI projects. Tryg entered with a project to develop an AI assistant that can help structure and summarise claims information, medical journals and other relevant medical documents when handling claims related to personal accidents. The aim is to handle claims at a faster pace than at present.
From a societal perspective, the discussions and conclusions from the two projects helped establish practices and explore opportunities for future AI projects. For Tryg, it was an opportunity to contribute to developing general guidelines and practices around AI and data protection while also getting the chance to have a proposed project evaluated.
{108}------------------------------------------------
Tracking effectiveness
Tracking the effectiveness of policies and actions for data management and cyber security is deeply embedded in Tryg's governance model, its three lines of defence and the continuous authority oversight. Defined regular reporting to the management's Risk Committee ensures adequate oversight of developments. Each year, specific compliance KPIs, for example related to GDPR, are defined for business and staff functions with the purpose of making sure that Tryg continuously improves its ways of working with compliance-related themes. Deviations or non-compliances are captured through the governance system, where specific risk thresholds are defined. No specific targets are defined.

{109}------------------------------------------------
Governance
Responsible business conduct is fundamental to Tryg's business, its credibility and its ability to succeed with its strategy. It is a responsibility that Tryg promotes throughout its value chain and expects employees, suppliers and business partners to comply with.
Governance highlights Business conduct
- Prevention of corruption and bribery
- Whistleblower mechanism
Supplier management
• ESG screenings

{110}------------------------------------------------
Governance highlights
Mandatory annual training in business conduct
All employees are required to complete annual e-learning in Tryg's Code of Conduct, Information Security and GDPR.
Whistleblower mechanism
Tryg's Whistleblower mechanism allows employees and specifically defined individuals to speak up about any suspected violation of the law or other serious matters.
Code of Conduct for employees and suppliers
Tryg's Code of Conduct defines expectations and guidelines applicable to all employees, while the Supplier Code of Conduct outlines specific ESG requirements for suppliers.
Supplier screenings
All suppliers are screened as part of the contractual agreements to assess their compliance with Tryg's Supplier Code of Conduct and their general ESG performance.
Sector standard for ESG questionnaires
Tryg, together with other insurance companies and the Danish trade association Insurance & Pension, has developed a common questionnaire for the automotive industry to help ease the burden of the ESG information to be submitted as part of the supplier screenings.
Annual supplier theme days
To build capacity, Tryg hosts annual theme days for suppliers around specific themes. This year's theme was asbestos, including how to comply with the legislation and how to ensure safe working conditions for workers.
{111}------------------------------------------------
Business conduct
Material impacts, risks and opportunities
For the standard 'Business Conduct', two material IROs are identified: Two potential negative impacts. One related to economic crime, including corruption and bribery, and one related to supplier management.
Negative impacts
Corruption and bribery
Potential incidents of corruption and bribery are primarily considered in externally-facing functions, such as claims handling, procurement, contracts and distribution.
Any incident will leave some parties in an disadvantaged position and will damage Tryg's credibility. Tryg relies on its strong compliance setup for ensuring that adequate and efficient preventive measures are in place. These include mandatory training of all employees and members of management, clear guidelines and policies, as well as dedicated efforts in areas considered most at risk.
Supplier management
To be able to resolve claims, Tryg relies on its supplier base to replace or repair the damaged item. Suppliers range across numerous sectors, from auto repair shops and carpenters to private hospitals and services. Negative impacts can occur, with some sectors more exposed than others, if social and environmental performance requirements are not clearly defined.
Tryg's Supplier Code of Conduct is included in the contractual agreements with suppliers and additional ESG supplier assessments are conducted with respect to governance and performance.

{112}------------------------------------------------
Business conduct
Business conduct policies and corporate culture
As a financial sector company, responsible business conduct is fundamental to Tryg's business, its credibility and its ability to succeed with its strategy. It is a responsibility that Tryg promotes throughout its value chain and expects employees, suppliers and business partners to comply with.
Tryg's Code of Conduct (CoC) describes the expectations and guidelines applicable to all employees and other partners who have undertaken to comply with the CoC in their agreements with Tryg. It covers themes such as accountability, good business conduct, effective and free competition, duty of confidentiality, sensitive data, and security and economic crime.
The CoC is based on the rules applicable to Tryg as an insurance company as well as international standards such as the United Nations Global Compact and, more specifically, the United Nations Convention against Corruption. The CoC is reviewed annually and approved by the Executive Board.
Establishing, developing, promoting and evaluating corporate culture
Tryg administers a special trust from the public in providing economic security for customers and this must not be jeopardised. A strong compliance setup is therefore critical to how Tryg conducts business.
In Tryg's governance model, initial precautions are taken to ensure an appropriate control environment through the 1st, 2nd and 3rd line of defence. The 1st line of defence is the business areas and Group functions responsible for day-to-day risk management. They are
responsible for carrying out everyday work based on Tryg's policies and instructions and are responsible for compliance with both internal and external requirements.
The 2nd line consists of the Compliance, Actuarial and Risk Management functions, which are responsible for overseeing and monitoring compliance with applicable laws, legislation and internal policies, assessing the adequacy of the provisions, and for facilitating and monitoring effective risk management practices as well as reporting.
The 3rd line consists of the Internal Audit function, which is responsible for ensuring an independent and objective audit of the organisation's internal controls, risk management and governance processes.
The governance setup provides the foundation for ways of working in Tryg, and it is regularly monitored through internal and external assessments to ensure compliance with legislation and regulation.
Business conduct training
All employees and members of management are required to complete e-learning on Tryg's CoC on an annual basis to ensure that they are aware of and understand Tryg's values and principles for ethical business behaviour. This includes training in anti-corruption, whistleblowing and good business practice.
Areas of higher risk are considered to be customer-facing functions, such as claims handling, procurement and contracts. Based on a risk assessment, these areas have implemented processes to mitigate the likelihood of a breach occurring. Group Security has implemented a process to track and control the maturity and effectiveness of the mitigating
measures in the higher risk areas. Investigation of suspected corruption and bribery incidents follows the established process for internal investigation.
Prevention and detection of corruption and bribery
In addition to Tryg's CoC and the annual employee training, Tryg has a written procedure in place for the purpose of establishing how Tryg helps to counter bribery and corruption. Preventive measures must be designed to foster a culture for detecting and combating incidents of corruption.
Measures include a management commitment, risk assessments, communication and training. The established internal governance holds each business area responsible for ensuring compliance with the procedure and for developing necessary guidance or training for their respective employees. Furthermore, controls are established for approval flows and the monitoring of transactions.
In case of suspected noncompliance with the procedure, Group Security, HR, the Whistleblower mechanism or the management's Risk Committee can be contacted to ensure an independent and qualified investigation of the specific case.
Prevention of corruption and bribery
| 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|
| ESRS ID | % | % |
| G1-3_07Functions-at-risk covered by training programmes | 100 | 100 |
Developments prevention of corruption and bribery
All employees and members of management are obliged to complete annual Code of Conduct training, which also cover corruption and bribery. The percentage of functions-at-risk covered by training therefore remains 100%.
Accounting policies
Prevention and detection of corruption and bribery G1-3
Percentage of functions-at-risk subject to training programmes are covered through mandatory training for all Tryg employees (permanent and temporary). Tryg operates with a zero-tolerance approach to corruption and bribery. The training covers Code of Conduct, anti-corruption and bribery, whistleblower, business ethics and practice, and IT security [G1-3_07].
{113}------------------------------------------------
Group Security reports Tryg's overall corruption and bribery risks to the management's and Supervisory Board's risk committees. Specific, severe cases can be directly escalated to the CFO of Tryg.
Whistleblower scheme
Tryg wishes to ensure that its credibility cannot be questioned and that any suspected violations of the law or other serious matters are investigated.
Employees and other specifically defined individuals, such as persons working under the supervision of suppliers or consultants and customers, can speak up about any suspected violation of the law or other serious matters relating to Tryg through its Whistleblower mechanism, which is available via Tryg's external websites and on the intranet.
Tryg's Whistleblower mechanism (link)
Among the matters that can be reported are suspected violations of financial regulations or the Anti-Money Laundering Act, suspicion of serious offences, such as financial crime, including bribery, fraud or corruption, violation of competition rules, or other suspected serious matters directed against employees, e.g. any form of physical or psychological violence, discrimination, human rights violations, harassment or violations of Tryg's CoC.
In certain cases, whistleblowers have special protection against retaliation insofar as the nature of the report is covered by the scope of the Whistleblower mechanism and as long as the report is based on reasonable cause and good faith.
Reports can be made anonymously and reported matters are investigated by the whistleblower unit, which is composed of the Head of Group Compliance in Tryg A/S, the Legal Director of Tryg Forsikring A/S, the Chairman of Tryg's Audit and Risk Committee and a senior compliance officer.
The whistleblower scheme is an electronic and independent system, offering the necessary security measures to protect the integrity and identity of the whistleblower and reported persons. Governance and procedures are in place to moderate the case handling process depending on who the report concerns and the nature of the report.

{114}------------------------------------------------
Supplier management
Tryg is a large buyer with a substantial annual spend across claims suppliers and indirect procurement categories. A large spend can create a high impact, so sustainability is an integral part of the procurement processes. Tryg aims to direct claims to suppliers in its network of claims suppliers. This benefits Tryg in terms of having an established supplier base while ensuring a steady flow of work to suppliers. The benefits are mutual and require close collaboration. Tryg has standard payment terms with respect to suppliers included in contracts to prevent late payment.
Tryg engages with suppliers for two main purposes: one, to ensure that potential negative social, environmental or governance impacts are closely monitored and, if necessary, acted upon; and two, to drive a change towards more repair practices and the employment of reused materials in the claims handling processes.
Tryg's procurement teams ensure that sustainability is an integral part of any supplier 'request for proposal', also for indirect supplier agreements such as canteen or cleaning suppliers. This year, ESG was included as a standard evaluation criteria. Tryg has a standardised process for including ESG in supplier contracts, which enables Tryg to use sustainability as a tool for ongoing dialogue and development with its suppliers. Tryg's sourcing managers engage in regular dialogue with suppliers to share Tryg's approach to more resource-efficient claims handling and to continuously improve data.
Tryg's Supplier Code of Conduct (SCoC) expresses the requirements and expectations for suppliers and partners with respect to sustainable and responsible business conduct. It is based on the ten principles of the UN Global
Compact covering business ethics, climate and environment, working conditions, employment practices, health and safety, and human rights.
Repeated or serious violations of the requirements in the SCoC may constitute a breach of contract with Tryg, in which case Tryg engages in dialogue with the supplier with a timebound action plan to address the breaches and a plan for remediation. As a last resort in cases of continued breaches, Tryg reserves the right to terminate any agreement with the supplier.
Supplier screenings
To facilitate the assessment of suppliers against the SCoC, Tryg systematically screens suppliers through an evaluation platform. This assesses suppliers' ESG risks and adherence to the UN Global Compact based on their responses to an ESG questionnaire.
The questionnaire covers the topics of the UN Global Compact. For example, with respect to human and labour rights, in terms of whether the supplier has a human rights policy or programmes and training on health & safety in place, or their due diligence process more generally.
Currently, 1,600 suppliers have received questionnaires covering ESG topics. Based on their responses to the ESG questionnaire, Tryg assesses whether further action is needed and engages in dialogue with suppliers accordingly, which enables Tryg to identify any potential or actual risk areas where collaboration should be advanced as a means of improving performance.
Tryg pays close attention to and tracks supplier responses to the questionnaire. This includes dialogues with, often smaller, suppliers who
have difficulty answering the questionnaires. This can be due to a lack of formalised procedures for managing some of the social or environmental issues at supplier level, issues of understanding and interpreting questions, or simply not having the necessary capacity or resources available. In cases where a supplier has not responded to the questionnaires or accepted Tryg's SCoC, Tryg's Procurement team will engage in dialogue with the supplier to resolve the matter and, if needed, draw up a timebound action plan.
As part of its due diligence, Tryg conducts an annual impact assessment to identify actual or potential negative impacts on value chain workers. It is based on an analysis of sectors and geographic location combined with supplier responses from the screening process. If gaps or potential negative impacts are identified, dialogue with the supplier will be the first step to identifying what is needed to mitigate the situation.
As expressed in the SCoC, Tryg expects suppliers to have a grievance mechanism or similar procedure in place to ensure their employees can voice grievances anonymously and without fear of reprisal. Additionally, workers in the value chain can at any time raise concerns through Tryg's anonymous whistleblower scheme, which is available for persons working under the supervision of the management of contracting parties, subcontractors, suppliers or consultants.
A description of the process for tracking and monitoring issues raised through the Whistleblower mechanism is given under the section 'Whistleblower scheme'.

{115}------------------------------------------------
Improving processes around supplier screenings and follow-ups
This year, Tryg implemented a new screening platform and onboarded procurement teams as well as suppliers across the Nordics. The goal was to simplify systems and to achieve real time data flows to enable a more automated process that taps into Tryg's other procurement practices and systems. The process for supplier screenings was further established amongst facility colleagues across the Nordics, where the scope, impact and purpose of supplier screenings were cemented.
Building capacity internally and on an ongoing basis ensures that Tryg's processes are aligned and that more knowledge on sustainability is established across the organisation.
In 2025, Tryg revised and simplified its ESG questionnaire for suppliers to ensure that it is still relevant, understandable to both large and small suppliers, and that it provides the necessary guidance. This ultimately builds sustainability capacity amongst suppliers and enables Tryg to better review responses and guide efforts for risk mitigation or knowledge sharing.
Industry standard for ESG questionnaires
Increasing requirements for reporting ESG data have impacted especially small suppliers in terms of the resources and qualifications needed to submit the necessary information to their customers. Encouraged by industry organisations in the automotive industry, Tryg and other insurance companies alongside the Danish trade organisation Insurance & Pension developed and launched an ESG
questionnaire to simplify the process and enable capacity building. The questionnaire builds on the industry standard developed by EFRAG for SMEs. The purpose was to standardise the information requested from this type of supplier across insurance companies in Denmark, thereby lightening the burden of suppliers having to report different data in different formats to different companies.
Engagement with suppliers
To help build capacity across suppliers and facilitate knowledge-sharing on good practice, Tryg hosts theme days or webinars with external suppliers and partners. In 2025, focus was on asbestos and how to properly manage a claim where asbestos is involved - both in terms of complying with applicable regulation and helping customers as quickly as possible while also taking appropriate measures with regard to the use of personal protective equipment.
Accounting policies
Suppliers screened
Tryg systematically screens contract and claims suppliers through an evaluation platform to assess suppliers' compliance with Tryg's Supplier Code of Conduct and sustainability performance [G1-2_02].
High-performance suppliers
When a supplier has accepted Tryg's Supplier Code of Conduct and has a policy or certificate within areas of sustainability, they are classified as 'high-performance suppliers'. This is tracked for both contract suppliers and claims suppliers. Small suppliers (1-5 employees) are classified as high-performance if they accept the Supplier Code of Conduct and have a documented positive contribution within a selected sustainability area [G1-2_02].
Management of relationships with suppliers
| 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|
| ESRS ID | % | % |
| G1-2_02Suppliers screened | ||
| Contract suppliers | 93 | 89 |
| Suppliers w/ claims | 94 | 97 |
| G1-2_02High-performance suppliers | ||
| Contract suppliers | 61 | 44 |
| Suppliers w/ claims | 62 | 46 |
Developments management of relationships with suppliers
There has been no significant changes to the share of contract and claims suppliers screened during the year.
The share of high-performing suppliers increased significantly primarily due to improvements in the data foundation as a result of changes to the supplier screening platform. During 2026, the concept of high-performing suppliers will be further developed and the criteria will be adjusted.
{116}------------------------------------------------
Data points deriving from other EU legislation
| Disclosure Requirement and related data point | SFDR(23) | Pillar3(24) | BenchmarkRegulation(25) | EUClimateLaw(26) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESRS 2 GOV-1 Board's gender diversity paragraph 21 (d) | p. 33 | p. 33 | ||
| ESRS 2 GOV-1 | p. 33 | |||
| Percentage of board members who are independent paragraph 21 (e) | ||||
| ESRS 2 GOV-4 | p. 60 | |||
| Statement on due diligence paragraph 30 | ||||
| ESRS 2 SBM-1 | Not material | Not material | Not material | |
| Involvement in activities related to fossil fuel activities paragraph 40 (d) i | ||||
| ESRS 2 SBM-1 | Not material | Not material | ||
| Involvement in activities related to chemical production paragraph 40 (d) ii | ||||
| ESRS 2 SBM-1 | Not material | Not material | ||
| Involvement in activities related to controversial weapons paragraph 40 (d) iii | ||||
| ESRS 2 SBM-1 | Not material | |||
| Involvement in activities related to cultivation and production of tobacco paragraph 40 (d) iv | ||||
| ESRS E1-1 | p. 68 | |||
| Transition plan to reach climate neutrality by 2050 paragraph 14 | ||||
| ESRS E1-1 | p. 68 | p. 68 | ||
| Undertakings excluded from Paris-aligned Benchmarks paragraph 16 (g) | ||||
| ESRS E1-4 | p. 75 | p. 75 | p. 75 | |
| GHG emission reduction targets paragraph 34 | ||||
| ESRS E1-5 | Not material | |||
| Energy consumption from fossil sources disaggregated by sources (only high climate impact sectors) paragraph 38 | ||||
| ESRS E1-5 Energy consumption and mix paragraph 37 | p. 78 | |||
| ESRS E1-5 | Not material | |||
| Energy intensity associated with activities in high climate impact sectors paragraphs 40 to 43 | ||||
| ESRS E1-6 | p. 77 | p. 77 | p. 77 | |
| Gross Scope 1, 2, 3 and Total GHG emissions paragraph 44 | ||||
| ESRS E1-6 | p. 78 | p. 78 | p. 78 | |
| Gross GHG emissions intensity paragraphs 53 to 55 | ||||
| ESRS E1-7 | Not material | |||
| GHG removals and carbon credits paragraph 56 | ||||
| ESRS E1-9 | Material (phase-in) | |||
| Exposure of the benchmark portfolio to climate-related physical risks paragraph 66 | ||||
| ESRS E1-9 | ||||
| Disaggregation of monetary amounts by acute and chronic physical risk paragraph 66 (a) | Material (phase-in) | |||
| ESRS E1-9 | ||||
| Location of significant assets at material physical risk paragraph 66 (c). | Material (phase-in) | |||
| ESRS E1-9 Breakdown of the carrying value of its real estate assets by energy-efficiency classes paragraph 67 (c). | Material (phase-in) | |||
| ESRS E1-9 | Material (phase-in) | |||
| Degree of exposure of the portfolio to climate-related opportunities paragraph 69 |
{117}------------------------------------------------
| Disclosure Requirement and related data point | SFDR(23) | Pillar3(24) | BenchmarkRegulation(25) | EUClimateLaw(26) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESRS E2-4 | Not material | |||
| AmountofeachpollutantlistedinAnnexIIoftheE-PRTRRegulation(EuropeanPollutantReleaseandTransfer | ||||
| Register) emitted to air, water and soil, paragraph 28 | ||||
| ESRS E3-1 | Not material | |||
| Water and marine resources paragraph 9 | ||||
| ESRS E3-1 | Not material | |||
| Dedicated policy paragraph 13 | ||||
| ESRS E3-1 | Not material | |||
| Sustainable oceans and seas paragraph 14 | ||||
| ESRS E3-4 | Not material | |||
| Total water recycled and reused paragraph 28 (c) | ||||
| ESRS E3-4 | Not material | |||
| Totalwaterconsumptioninm3pernetrevenueinownoperationsparagraph29 | ||||
| ESRS 2- SBM 3 - E4 paragraph 16 (a) i | Not material | |||
| ESRS 2- SBM 3 - E4 paragraph 16 (b) | Not material | |||
| ESRS 2- SBM 3 - E4 paragraph 16 (c) | Not material | |||
| ESRS E4-2 | ||||
| Sustainable land / agriculture practices or policies paragraph 24 (b) | Not material | |||
| ESRS E4-2 | ||||
| Sustainable oceans / seas practices or policies paragraph 24 (c) | Not material | |||
| ESRS E4-2 | ||||
| Policies to address deforestation paragraph 24 (d) | Not material | |||
| ESRS E5-5 | ||||
| Non-recycled waste paragraph 37 (d) | Not material | |||
| ESRS E5-5 | ||||
| Hazardous waste and radioactive waste paragraph 39 | Not material | |||
| ESRS 2- SBM3 - S1 | ||||
| Risk of incidents of forced labour paragraph 14 (f) | Not material | |||
| ESRS 2- SBM3 - S1 | ||||
| Risk of incidents of child labour paragraph 14 (g) | Not material | |||
| ESRS S1-1 | ||||
| Human rights policy commitments paragraph 20 | p. 60 | |||
| ESRS S1-1 | ||||
| Due diligence policies on issues addressed by the fundamental International Labour Organisation Conventions 1 to | ||||
| 8, paragraph 21 | p. 60 | |||
| ESRS S1-1 | Not material | |||
| processes and measures for preventing trafficking in human beings paragraph 22 | ||||
| ESRS S1-1 | Not material | |||
| workplace accident prevention policy or management system paragraph 23 | ||||
| ESRS S1-3 | p. 114 | |||
| grievance/complaints handling mechanisms paragraph 32 (c) |
{118}------------------------------------------------
| Disclosure Requirement and related data point | SFDR(23) | Pillar3(24) | BenchmarkRegulation(25) | EUClimateLaw(26) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESRS S1-14 | ||||
| Number of fatalities and number and rate of work-related accidents paragraph 88 (b) and (c) | Not material | Not material | ||
| ESRS S1-14 | ||||
| Number of days lost to injuries, accidents, fatalities or illness paragraph 88 (e) | Not material | |||
| ESRS S1-16 | ||||
| Unadjusted gender pay gap paragraph 97 (a) | p. 104 | p. 104 | ||
| ESRS S1-16 | ||||
| Excessive CEO pay ratio paragraph 97 (b) | p. 104 | |||
| ESRS S1-17 | ||||
| Incidents of discrimination paragraph 103 (a) | p. 104 | |||
| ESRS S1-17 Non-respect of UNGPs on Business and Human Rights and OECD Guidelines paragraph 104 (a) | Not material | Not material | ||
| ESRS 2- SBM3 – S2 | ||||
| Significant risk of child labour or forced labour in the value chain paragraph 11 (b) | Not material | |||
| ESRS S2-1 | ||||
| Human rights policy commitments paragraph 17 | Not material | |||
| ESRS S2-1 Policies related to value chain workers paragraph 18 | Not material | |||
| ESRS S2-1Non-respect of UNGPs on Business and Human Rights principles and OECD guidelines paragraph 19 | Not material | Not material | ||
| ESRS S2-1 | ||||
| Due diligence policies on issues addressed by the fundamental International Labor Organisation Conventions 1 to | ||||
| 8, paragraph 19 | Not material | |||
| ESRS S2-4 | ||||
| Human rights issues and incidents connected to its upstream and downstream value chain paragraph 36 | Not material | |||
| ESRS S3-1 | ||||
| Human rights policy commitments paragraph 16 | Not material | |||
| ESRS S3-1 | ||||
| non-respect of UNGPs on Business and Human Rights, ILO principles or OECD guidelines paragraph 17 | Not material | Not material | ||
| ESRS S3-4 | ||||
| Human rights issues and incidents paragraph 36 | Not material | |||
| ESRS S4-1 Policies related to consumers and end-users paragraph 16 | p. 106, p. 108 | |||
| ESRS S4-1Non-respect of UNGPs on Business and Human Rights and OECD guidelines paragraph 17 | p. 60 | p. 60 | ||
| ESRS S4-4 | ||||
| Human rights issues and incidents paragraph 35 | Not material | |||
| ESRS G1-1 | ||||
| United Nations Convention against Corruption paragraph 10 (b) | p. 113 | |||
| ESRS G1-1 | ||||
| Protection of whistle-blowers paragraph 10 (d) | p. 114 | |||
| ESRS G1-4 | ||||
| Fines for violation of anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws paragraph 24 (a) | Material (postponed) | Material (postponed) | ||
| ESRS G1-4 | ||||
| Standards of anti-corruption and anti-bribery paragraph 24 (b) | Material (postponed) |
{119}------------------------------------------------
Independent auditor's limited assurance report on Sustainability Statement
To the stakeholders of Tryg A/S
Limited assurance conclusion
We have conducted a limited assurance engagement on the sustainability statement of Tryg A/S (the "Group") included in the management's review (the "Sustainability Statement") for the financial year 1 January – 31 December 2025
Based on the procedures we have performed and the evidence we have obtained, nothing has come to our attention that causes us to believe that the Sustainability Statement is not prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with the Danish Insurance Business Act Chapter 17, including:
- compliance with the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), including that the process carried out by the management to identify the information reported in the Sustainability Statement (the "Process") is in accordance with the description set out in the section "Double materiality assessment"; and
- compliance of the disclosures in the section "EU Taxonomy" of the Sustainability Statement with Article 8 of EU Regulation 2020/852 (the "Taxonomy Regulation").
Basis for conclusion
We conducted our limited assurance engagement in accordance with International Standard on Assurance Engagements (ISAE) 3000 (Revised), Assurance engagements other than audits or reviews of historical financial information ("ISAE 3000 (Revised)") and the additional requirements applicable in Denmark.
The procedures in a limited assurance engagement vary in nature and timing from, and are less in extent than for, a reasonable assurance engagement. Consequently, the level of assurance obtained in a limited assurance engagement is substantially lower than the assurance that would have been obtained had a reasonable assurance engagement been performed.
We believe that the evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our conclusion. Our responsibilities under this standard are further described in the 'Auditor's responsibilities for the assurance engagement' section of our report.
Our independence and quality management
We are independent of the Group in accordance with the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants' International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (IESBA Code) and the additional ethical requirements applicable in Denmark. We have also fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements and the IESBA Code.
Our firm applies International Standard on Quality Management 1, which requires the firm to design, implement and operate a system of quality management including policies or procedures regarding compliance with ethical requirements, professional standards and applicable legal and regulatory requirements.
Management's responsibilities for the Sustainability Statement
Management is responsible for designing and implementing a process to identify the information reported in the Sustainability
Statement in accordance with the ESRS and for disclosing this Process as included in the section "Double materiality assessment" of the Sustainability Statement. This responsibility includes:
- understanding the context in which the Group's activities and business relationships take place and developing an understanding of its affected stakeholders:
- the identification of the actual and potential impacts (both negative and positive) related to sustainability matters, as well as risks and opportunities that affect, or could reasonably be expected to affect, the Group's financial position, financial performance, cash flows, access to finance or cost of capital over the short-, medium-, or long-term;
- the assessment of the materiality of the identified impacts, risks and opportunities related to sustainability matters by selecting and applying appropriate thresholds; and
- making assumptions that are reasonable in the circumstances.
Management is further responsible for the preparation of the Sustainability Statement, which includes the information identified by the Process, in accordance with the Danish Insurance Business Act Chapter 17, including:
-
compliance with the ESRS:
-
preparing the disclosures as included in the section "EU Taxonomy" of the Sustainability Statement, in compliance with Article 8 of the Taxonomy Regulation;
-
designing, implementing and maintaining such internal control that management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of the Sustainability Statement
-
that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and
-
the selection and application of appropriate sustainability reporting methods and making assumptions and estimates that are reasonable in the circumstances.
Inherent limitations in preparing the Sustainability Statement
In reporting forward-looking information in accordance with ESRS, management is required to prepare the forward-looking information on the basis of disclosed assumptions about events that may occur in the future and possible future actions by the Group. Actual outcomes are likely to be different since anticipated events frequently do not occur as expected.
Auditor's responsibilities for the assurance engagement
Our responsibility is to plan and perform the assurance engagement to obtain limited assurance about whether the Sustainability Statement is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue a limited assurance report that includes our conclusion. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence decisions of users taken on the basis of the Sustainability Statement as a whole.
As part of a limited assurance engagement in accordance with ISAE 3000 (Revised) we exercise professional judgement and maintain professional scepticism throughout the engagement.
{120}------------------------------------------------
Our responsibilities in respect of the Process include:
- Obtaining an understanding of the Process, but not for the purpose of providing a conclusion on the effectiveness of the Process, including the outcome of the Process;
- Considering whether the information identified addresses the applicable disclosure requirements of the ESRS; and
- Designing and performing procedures to evaluate whether the Process is consistent with the Group's description of its Process, as disclosed in the section "Double materiality assessment".
Our other responsibilities in respect of the Sustainability Statement include:
- Identifying where material misstatements are likely to arise, whether due to fraud or error; and
- Designing and performing procedures responsive to disclosures in the Sustainability Statement where material misstatements are likely to arise. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.
Summary of the work performed
A limited assurance engagement involves performing procedures to obtain evidence about the Sustainability Statement. The nature, timing and extent of procedures selected depend on professional judgement, including the identification of disclosures where material misstatements are likely to arise, whether due to fraud or error, in the Sustainability Statement.
In conducting our limited assurance engagement, with respect to the Process, we:
- Obtained an understanding of the Process by performing inquiries to understand the sources of the information used by management; and reviewing the Group's internal documentation of its Process; and
- Evaluated whether the evidence obtained from our procedures about the Process implemented by the Group was consistent with the description of the Process set out in the section "Double materiality assessment".
In conducting our limited assurance engagement, with respect to the Sustainability Statement, we:
-
Obtained an understanding of the Group's reporting processes relevant to the preparation of its Sustainability Statement including the consolidation processes by obtaining an understanding of the Group's control environment, processes and information systems relevant to the preparation of the Sustainability Statement but not evaluating the design of particular control activities, obtaining evidence about their implementation or testing their operating effectiveness;
-
Evaluated whether the information identified by the Process is included in the Sustainability Statement;
-
Evaluated whether the structure and the presentation of the Sustainability Statement are in accordance with the ESRS;
-
Performed inquiries of relevant personnel and analytical procedures on selected information in the Sustainability Statement;
-
Performed substantive assurance procedures on selected information in the Sustainability Statement;
-
Where applicable, compared disclosures in the Sustainability Statement with the
-
corresponding disclosures in the financial statements and management's review;
-
Evaluated the methods, assumptions and data for developing estimates and forwardlooking information; and
-
Obtained an understanding of the Group's process to identify taxonomy-eligible and taxonomy-aligned economic activities and the corresponding disclosures in the Sustainability Statement.
Hellerup, 22 January 2026
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Statsautoriseret Revisionspartnerselskab CVR no 33771231
Per Rolf Larssen
State Authorised Public Accountant mne24822
Stefan Vastrup
State Authorised Public Accountant mne32126
{121}------------------------------------------------
Norwegian Transparency Act
Tryg Norway is subject to the Norwegian Transparency Act. This section constitutes the reporting according to its criteria. For general information regarding Tryg's business and value chain see page 53.
Human and labour rights due diligence
Tryg's commitment to responsible business conduct extends beyond compliance and risk mitigation. The company has high ambitions to foster a diverse culture and to push for more sustainable solutions internally for employees, through collaboration with suppliers, and through engagement with customers.
As expressed in Tryg's Human and Labour Rights policy, Tryg is fully committed to respecting fundamental human rights and decent working conditions as expressed in, for example, the International Bill of Human Rights and the International Labour Organisation's (ILO) core conventions on fundamental rights and principles in working life.
Tryg recognises that it can potentially cause, contribute or be linked to adverse social and environmental impacts across its operations, through its products and services, its customers and business partners, and across its supply chain.
Tryg therefore works with due diligence principles in line with the UN Guiding Principles and the OECD Guidelines of continuously identifying, assessing and mitigating actual or potential adverse impacts.
The assessment considers severity, likelihood and level of complicity of potential adverse impacts.
Using a desk-based human rights risk assessment across its own employees, customers and suppliers, Tryg identified and highlighted areas of potentially heightened risk. The purpose of the assessment was to map potential impacts and ensure that existing processes, governance and actions for mitigation are in place.
Own employees
For its own employees, the general risk of being complicit or contributing to adverse impacts on human and labour rights is considered low. This is due to the nature of the work – primarily office-related, high-skilled work – and the location of its operations, i.e. Denmark, Norway and Sweden.
Findings from the impact risk assessment correspond to material negative impacts identified under the ESRS standard 'S1 Own Workforce', namely related to gender pay inequalities. Among the measures for tracking developments and gaining insight into the current situation is the employee engagement survey, which is supported by a mandatory predefined process for team discussions and follow-up.
Additionally, close collaboration and frequent meetings with unions and union representatives, both at local and regional level, ensure that relevant employee issues can be raised and managed.
Read more in the section "Own Workforce" on page 95.
Suppliers
In the supply chain, Tryg has established measures and governance to continuously monitor and assess potential impacts and poor performance across social and environmental issues. To facilitate the evaluation of suppliers against the SCoC, Tryg systematically screens suppliers through an evaluation platform. Through the platform, Tryg evaluates suppliers' ESG risks, opportunities and their adherence to the ten principles of the UN Global Compact based on their responses to an ESG questionnaire.
The questionnaire covers the topics of the UN Global Compact, for example related to human and labour rights, for instance whether the supplier has a human rights policy or programmes and training on health & safety in place, or more generally about what their due diligence process entails.
Currently, a total of 1,550 suppliers have received and responded to questionnaires covering ESG topics. Based on their responses to the ESG questionnaire, Tryg assesses whether further action is needed and engages in dialogue with suppliers accordingly, which enables Tryg to identify any potential or actual risk areas where collaboration should be advanced as a means of improving performance.
The outcome of the screenings shows a generally low risk of adverse impacts at suppliers. Nevertheless, realising that Tryg's suppliers include industries that are potentially more exposed to labour rights issues, Tryg continuously works to improve its processes and to more precisely determine, address and mitigate the specific risks that might occur at supplier level.
Read more about how Tryg works with responsible supply chain management on page 115.
Customers
Tryg can be linked to adverse social and environmental impacts through the commercial customers it insures. Tryg is therefore actively communicating its expectations to commercial customers to follow the ten principles of the UN Global Compact. This is part of the insurance conditions.
Tryg is currently making efforts to better integrate relevant ESG factors into the underwriting process. Building on experience from the previous customer screening setup, it is central that ESG parameters are assessed as part of the underwriting process and as an integrated part of the overall risk assessment. The project is defined in phases, and as a first step Tryg Norway rolled out the new checklist including ESG questions in Q4 2025. Next step for 2026 is to update the process for Denmark, and eventually Sweden.
{122}------------------------------------------------
Contents - Financial statements
Tryg Group's financial statements are prepared in accordance with IFRS Accounting Standards
Tryg Group
| Note | Note | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Statement by the Supervisory Board and the | Net finance income/expenses from reinsurance | Tryg A/S (parent company) | |||||
| Executive BoardIndependent Auditor's Reports | 124125 | 1112 | contractsOther income and costs | 158158 | Income and comprehensive income statement | 200 | |
| Income and comprehensive income statement | 129 | 13 | Tax | 159 | Statement of financial position | 201 | |
| Statement of financial position | 130 | 14 | Intangible assets | 162 | Statement of changes in equity | 202 | |
| Statement of changes in equity | 131 | 15 | Property, plant and equipment | 168 | Notes | 203 | |
| Cash flow statement | 132 | 16 | Investment property | 170 | |||
| 1 | General accounting policies | 133 | 17 | Equity investments in associates | 171 | Reporting for Q4 | |
| 2 | Risk and capital management | 138 | 18 | Financial assets | 171 | Quarterly outline - Segments | 207 |
| Insurance risk | 140 | 19 | Assets from reinsurance contracts | 176 | Quarterly outline - Geography | 209 | |
| Underwriting risk | 140 | 20 | Equity | 178 | |||
| Reserving risk | 140 | 21 | Subordinated loan capital | 180 | Information | ||
| Investment risk | 144 | 22 | Insurance contracts liabilities | 182 | Group chart | 212 | |
| Operational risk | 147 | 23 | Pensions and similar obligations | 186 | Glossary, key ratios and alternative performance | ||
| Other risks | 147 | 24 | Deferred tax | 187 | measures | 213 | |
| Liquidity risk | 148 | 25 | Other provisions | 189 | Disclaimer | 215 | |
| 3 | Operating segments | 149 | 26 | Earnings per share, operating earnings per share | 189 | ||
| 4 | Insurance service result by geography | 151 | 27 | Other debt | 190 | ||
| 5 | Insurance service result by line of business | 153 | Contractual obligations, collateral and contingent | ||||
| 6 | Insurance revenue | 155 | 28 | liabilities | 191 | ||
| 7 | Insurance service expenses | 155 | 29 | Related parties | 192 | ||
| 8 | Interest and dividends | 157 | 30 | Share-based payments | 195 | ||
| 9 | Value adjustments | 157 | 31 | Financial highlight | 199 | ||
| Net finance income/expenses from insurance | |||||||
| 10 | contracts | 158 |
{123}------------------------------------------------
Statement by the Supervisory Board and the Executive Board
The Supervisory Board and Executive Board have today considered and adopted the Annual Report of Tryg A/S for the financial year 1 January – 31 December 2025.
The Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRS Accounting Standards as adopted by the EU and further requirements in the Danish Insurance Business Act for listed financial services companies and the requirements of NASDAQ Copenhagen for the presentation of the financial statements of listed companies. The Parent Company Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with the Danish Insurance Business Act. Management's Review has been prepared in accordance with the Danish Insurance Business Act.
In our opinion, the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Parent Company Financial Statements give a true and fair view of the Group's and the Parent Company's assets, liabilities and financial position as at 31 December 2025 and of the results of the Group and the Parent Company operations and the cash flows of the Group for the financial year 1 January - 31 December 2025.
In our opinion, Management's Review includes a fair review of the development in the operations and financial circumstances of the Group and the Parent Company, of the results for the year and of the financial position of the Group and the Parent Company as well as a description of the most significant risk and elements of uncertainty, which the Group and the Parent Company are facing.
Additionally, the sustainability statement, which is part of Management's Review, is prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with Chapter 17 of the Danish Insurance Business Act and rules issued accordingly. This includes compliance with the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) including that the process undertaken by Management to identify the reported information (the "Process") is in accordance with the description set out in the subsection Double materiality assessment (IRO-1). Furthermore, disclosures within the Environmental section of the sustainability statement are, in all material respects, in accordance with Article 8 of EU Regulation 2020/852 (the "Taxonomy Regulation").
The sustainability statement includes forwardlooking statements based on disclosed assumptions about events that may occur in the future and possible future actions by the Group.
Actual outcomes are likely to be different since anticipated events frequently do not occur as expected.
In our opinion, the Annual Report of Tryg A/S for the financial year 1 January to 31 December 2025 with the file name tryg-2025-12-31- en.zip is prepared, in all material respects, in compliance with the ESEF Regulation.
We recommend that the Annual Report be adopted at the Annual General Meeting.
Ballerup, 22 January 2026
Executive Board
Supervisory Board
Chairman Deputy Chairman
Jukka Pertola Steffen Kragh Benedicte Bakke Agerup Carl-Viggo Östlund Thomas Hofman-Bang Mengmeng Du Anne Kaltoft
Johan Kirstein Brammer Allan Kragh Thaysen Lars Bonde Alexandra Bastkær Winther Mikael Kärrsten
Group CEO Group CFO Group COO Group CCO Group CTO
Torben Jensen Jørn Rise Andersen Charlotte Dietzer Tina Snejbjerg Jonas Bjørn Jensen Gunnar Elias Bakk Mette Osvold Lena Darin
{124}------------------------------------------------
Independent Auditor's Reports
To the shareholders of Tryg A/S
Report on the audit of the Financial Statements
Our opinion
In our opinion, the Consolidated Financial Statements give a true and fair view of the Group's financial position at 31 December 2025 and of the results of the Group's operations and cash flows for the financial year 1 January to 31 December 2025 in accordance with IFRS Accounting Standards as adopted by the EU and further requirements in the Danish Insurance Business Act.
Moreover, in our opinion, the Parent Company Financial Statements give a true and fair view of the Parent Company's financial position at 31 December 2025 and of the results of the Parent Company's operations for the financial year 1 January to 31 December 2025 in accordance with the Danish Insurance Business Act.
Our opinion is consistent with our Auditor's Long-form Report to the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors.
What we have audited
The Consolidated Financial Statements of Tryg A/S for the financial year 1 January to 31 December 2025 comprise the income and comprehensive income statement, the statement of financial position, the statement of changes in equity, the cash flow statement and notes, including material accounting policy information.
The Parent Company Financial Statements of Tryg A/S for the financial year 1 January to 31 December 2025 comprise the income and comprehensive income statement, the statement of financial position, the statement of changes in equity and notes, including material accounting policy information.
Collectively referred to as the "Financial Statements".
Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (ISAs) and the additional requirements applicable in Denmark. Our responsibilities under those standards and requirements are further described in the Auditor's responsibilities for the audit of the Financial Statements section of our report.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
Independence
We are independent of the Group in accordance with the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants' International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (IESBA Code) as applicable to audits of financial statements of public interest entities, and the additional ethical requirements applicable in Denmark. We have also fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements and the IESBA Code.
To the best of our knowledge and belief, prohibited non-audit services referred to in Article 5(1) of Regulation (EU) No 537/2014 were not provided.
Appointment
We were first appointed auditors of Tryg A/S on 26 March 2021 for the financial year 2021. We have been reappointed annually by shareholder resolution for a total period of uninterrupted engagement of 5 years including the financial year 2025.
{125}------------------------------------------------
Independent Auditor's Reports
Key audit matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of the Financial Statements for 2025. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the Financial Statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.
Measurement of insurance contract liabilities
The Group's Insurance contract liabilities total DKK 47,153 million, which constitutes 45% of the total equity and liabilities. Insurance contract liabilities primarily comprise premium provisions (liability for remaining coverage, LRC) and claims provisions (liability for incurred claims, LIC).
The IFRS 17 premium allocation approach (PAA) is applied for measurement of groups of insurance contracts.
On initial recognition the carrying amount of premium provisions (LRC) is recognised as the premiums received. Subsequently, the carrying amount of the LRC is increased by any premiums received and decreased by the amount recognised as insurance revenue for services provided. Services are primarily provided based on passage of time. If a group of contracts is onerous, the liability is increased for the remaining coverage, where the expected fulfilment cash flows covers direct and indirect costs relating to the remaining service period. Insurance acquisition costs are expensed as incurred.
Claims provisions (LIC) are measured as the total of the expected fulfilment cash flows relating to insurance events occurred at the statement of financial position date, which comprise estimates of future cash flows, adjusted to reflect the time value of money and the associated financial risks, and a risk adjustment for non-financial risks. The estimate includes direct and indirect claims handling costs that arise from events occurred at or before the statement of financial position date.
Accounting estimates in respect of insurance contract liabilities is an experience-based estimate involving use of historic claims data and complex actuarial methods and models, which involve significant assumptions on the frequency and extent of insurance events relating to the insurance contracts.
We focused on the measurement of insurance contract liabilities, as the accounting estimate is by nature complex and influenced by subjectivity and thus to a large extent associated with estimation uncertainty.
Reference is made to the description in the Financial Statements of "Risk and capital management" in Note 2 and in "Accounting policies" sections "Significant accounting estimates and assessments" and "Insurance and reinsurance contracts" in Note 1.
How our audit addressed the key audit matter
We performed risk assessment procedures with the purpose of achieving an understanding of it-systems, procedures and relevant controls relating to claims processing and insurance provisioning. In respect of controls, we assessed whether these were designed and implemented effectively to address the risk of material misstatement. For selected controls that we planned to rely on, we tested whether these controls had been performed on a consistent basis.
We used our own actuaries in the evaluation of the actuarial methods and models applied by the Group as well as assumptions applied, and calculations made. For a sample of insurance contract liabilities, we tested the calculation and the data used in the underlying documentation.
We assessed and challenged the methods and models and significant assumptions applied based on our experience and industry knowledge with a view to ensure that these are in line with regulatory and accounting requirements, including IFRS 17. This comprised an assessment of the continuity in the basis for the calculation of insurance contract liabilities.
We tested the calculation of insurance contract liabilities on a sample basis.
We assessed whether the disclosures on insurance contract liabilities were adequate.
Recoverability of the carrying amount of goodwill, trademarks and customer relations
The Group's goodwill, trademarks and customer relations total DKK 29,428 million, which constitutes 28% of the total assets.
The principal risks are in relation to Management's assessment of the future timing and amount of projected cash flows that are used to assess the recoverability of the carrying amount of goodwill, trademark and customer relations. There are specific risks related to the impact on future earnings from competition and economic trends in key markets. Bearing in mind the generally long-lived nature of the assets, the significant assumptions are Management's view of expected insurance revenue growth, gross claims ratio, reinsurance ratio, gross expense ratio and discount rate.
We focused on this, as there is a high level of subjectivity exercised by Management in estimating future cash flows and the models used are complex.
The key assumptions and accounting treatment are described in Note 14 "Intangible assets" in the Financial Statements, in section "Measurement of Goodwill, Trademarks and Customer relations" and in "Accounting policies" sections "Significant accounting estimates and assessments" in Note 1.
How our audit addressed the key audit matter
We performed risk assessment procedures to obtain an understanding of IT systems, business processes and relevant controls related to the assessment of the carrying amount of goodwill, trademarks and customer relations. In respect of controls, we assessed whether these were designed and implemented effectively to address the risk of material misstatement.
We considered the appropriateness of Management's defined CGUs within the business. We examined the methodology used by Management to assess the carrying amount of goodwill, trademarks and customer relations and the process for identifying CGUs that require impairment testing to determine compliance with IFRS. We performed detailed testing for the assets where an impairment review was required and evaluated whether there were any indications of impairment of the assets. We analysed the reasonableness of significant assumptions in relation to the ongoing operations related to the assets.
We evaluated and challenged the assumptions used by Management, including assessment of expected insurance revenue growth, gross claims ratio, reinsurance ratio, gross expense ratio and discount rate and tested the mathematical accuracy of the relevant value-in-use models prepared by Management.
Further, we assessed the appropriateness of disclosures, including sensitivity analyses prepared for the significant assumptions.
{126}------------------------------------------------
Independent Auditor's Reports
Statement on Management's Review
Management is responsible for Management's Review.
Our opinion on the Financial Statements does not cover Management's Review, and we do not as part of the audit express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit of the Financial Statements, our responsibility is to read Management's Review and, in doing so, consider whether Management's Review is materially inconsistent with the Financial Statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated.
Moreover, we considered whether Management's Review includes the disclosures required by the Danish Insurance Business Act. This does not include the requirements in the Financial Insurance Act Chapter 17 and rules issued accordingly related to the sustainability statement covered by the separate auditor's limited assurance report hereon.
Based on the work we have performed, in our view, Management's Review is in accordance with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Parent Company Financial Statements and has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Danish Insurance Business Act, except for the requirements related to the sustainability statement, cf. above. We did not identify any material misstatement in Management's Review.
Management's responsibilities for the Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation of consolidated financial statements and parent company financial statements that give a true and fair view in accordance with IFRS Accounting Standards as adopted by the EU and further requirements in the Danish Insurance Business Act, and for such internal control as Management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the Financial Statements, Management is responsible for assessing the Group's and the Parent Company's ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless Management either intends to liquidate the Group or the Parent Company or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so.
Auditor's responsibilities for the audit of the Financial Statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the Financial Statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor's report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs and the additional requirements applicable in Denmark will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these Financial Statements.
As part of an audit in accordance with ISAs and the additional requirements applicable in Denmark, we exercise professional judgement and maintain professional scepticism throughout the audit. We also:
• Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the Financial Statements, whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.
- Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Group's and the Parent Company's internal control.
- Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures made by Management.
- Conclude on the appropriateness of Management's use of the going concern basis of accounting and based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Group's and the Parent Company's ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditor's report to the related disclosures in the Financial Statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor's report. However, future events or conditions may cause the Group or the Parent Company to cease to continue as a going concern.
- Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the Financial Statements, including the disclosures, and whether the Financial Statements represent the underlying transactions and events in a manner that gives a true and fair view.
{127}------------------------------------------------
Independent Auditor's Reports
• Plan and perform the group audit to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the financial information of the entities or business units within the group as a basis for forming an opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Parent Company Financial Statements. We are responsible for the direction, supervision and review of the audit work performed for purposes of the group audit. We remain solely responsible for our audit opinion.
We communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit.
We also provide those charged with governance with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements regarding independence, and to communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence and, where applicable, actions taken to eliminate threats or safeguards applied.
From the matters communicated with those charged with governance, we determine those matters that were of most significance in the audit of the Financial Statements of the current period and are therefore the key audit matters. We describe these matters in our auditor's report unless law or regulation precludes public disclosure about the matter.
Report on compliance with the ESEF Regulation
As part of our audit of the Financial Statements we performed procedures to express an opinion on whether the annual report of Tryg A/S for the financial year 1 January to 31 December 2025 with the filename tryg-2025-12-31-en.zip is prepared, in all material respects, in compliance with the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/815 on the European Single Electronic Format (ESEF Regulation) which includes requirements related to the preparation of the annual report in XHTML format and iXBRL tagging of the Consolidated Financial Statements including notes.
Management is responsible for preparing an annual report that complies with the ESEF Regulation. This responsibility includes:
- The preparing of the annual report in XHTML format;
- The selection and application of appropriate iXBRL tags, including extensions to the ESEF taxonomy and the anchoring thereof to elements in the taxonomy, for all financial information required to be tagged using judgement where necessary;
- Ensuring consistency between iXBRL tagged data and the Consolidated Financial Statements presented in human-readable format; and
- For such internal control as Management determines necessary to enable the
preparation of an annual report that is compliant with the ESEF Regulation.
Our responsibility is to obtain reasonable assurance on whether the annual report is prepared, in all material respects, in compliance with the ESEF Regulation based on the evidence we have obtained, and to issue a report that includes our opinion. The nature, timing and extent of procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgement, including the assessment of the risks of material departures from the requirements set out in the ESEF Regulation, whether due to fraud or error. The procedures include:
- Testing whether the annual report is prepared in XHTML format;
- Obtaining an understanding of the company's iXBRL tagging process and of internal control over the tagging process;
- Evaluating the completeness of the iXBRL tagging of the Consolidated Financial Statements including notes;
- Evaluating the appropriateness of the company's use of iXBRL elements selected from the ESEF taxonomy and the creation of extension elements where no suitable element in the ESEF taxonomy has been identified;
- Evaluating the use of anchoring of extension elements to elements in the ESEF taxonomy; and
Reconciling the iXBRL tagged data with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements.
In our opinion, the annual report of Tryg A/S for the financial year 1 January to 31 December 2025 with the file name tryg-2025-12-31-en.zip is prepared, in all material respects, in compliance with the ESEF Regulation.
Hellerup, 22 January 2026
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Statsautoriseret Revisionspartnerselskab CVR No 33771231
Per Rolf Larssen
State Authorised Public Accountant mne24822
Stefan Vastrup
State Authorised Public Accountant mne32126
{128}------------------------------------------------
Income and comprehensive income statement
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Note | |||
| 6 | Insurance revenue | 41,515 | 39,974 |
| 7 | Insurance service expenses | -32,795 | -32,171 |
| Expenses from reinsurance contracts held | -1,230 | -1,349 | |
| Income from reinsurance contracts held | 455 | 601 | |
| 3-5 | Insurance service result | 7,945 | 7,056 |
| Investment activities | |||
| Profit/loss from associates | -15 | -48 | |
| Income from investment property | 12 | 22 | |
| 8 | Interest income and dividends | 1,476 | 1,633 |
| 9 | Value adjustments | 91 | 559 |
| 8 | Interest expenses | -295 | -392 |
| Administration expenses in connection with investment activities | -157 | -239 | |
| Investment return | 1,111 | 1,535 | |
| 10 | Net finance income/expense from insurance contracts | -339 | -747 |
| 11 | Net finance income/expense from reinsurance contracts | 5 | 124 |
| Net investment result | 778 | 911 | |
| 12 | Other income | 115 | 132 |
| 12 | Other costs | -1,626 | -1,796 |
| Profit/loss before tax | 7,212 | 6,303 | |
| 13 | Tax | -1,807 | -1,488 |
| Profit/loss for the period | 5,405 | 4,816 | |
| 26 | Earnings per share | 8.83 | 7.71 |
| 26 | Diluted earnings per share | 8.80 | 7.70 |
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Note | |||
| Profit/loss for the period | 5,405 | 4,816 | |
| Other comprehensive income which cannot subsequently bereclassified as profit or loss | |||
| Actuarial gains/losses on defined-benefit pension plans | 1 | -1 | |
| Tax on actuarial gains/losses on defined-benefit pension plans | 0 | 0 | |
| 1 | -1 | ||
| Other comprehensive income which can subsequently bereclassified as profit or loss | |||
| Exchange rate adjustments of foreign entities | 1,545 | -1,030 | |
| Hedging of currency risk in foreign entities | -189 | 262 | |
| Tax on hedging of currency risk in foreign entities | 49 | -68 | |
| 1,406 | -837 | ||
| Total other comprehensive income | 1,407 | -838 | |
| Comprehensive income | 6,812 | 3,978 |
{129}------------------------------------------------
Statement of financial position
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Note | |||
| Assets | |||
| 14 | Intangible assets | 31,398 | 30,692 |
| Operating equipment | 153 | 192 | |
| Group-occupied property | 720 | 759 | |
| 15 | Total property, plant and equipment | 874 | 951 |
| 16 | Investment property | 0 | 429 |
| 17 | Equity investments in associates | 33 | 38 |
| Total investments in associates | 33 | 38 | |
| Equity investments | 2,401 | 3,836 | |
| Unit trust units | 1,189 | 1,168 | |
| Bonds | 60,481 | 59,687 | |
| Derivative financial instruments | 577 | 661 | |
| Reverse repurchase agreement | 0 | 340 | |
| 18 | Total other financial investment assets | 64,648 | 65,693 |
| Total investment assets | 64,681 | 66,159 | |
| 19 | Assets from reinsurance contracts | 2,194 | 2,974 |
| Other receivables | 704 | 472 | |
| Total receivables | 704 | 472 | |
| 13 | Current tax assets | 60 | 43 |
| Cash at bank and in hand | 2,864 | 2,123 | |
| Total other assets | 2,924 | 2,166 | |
| Interest and rent receivable | 338 | 388 | |
| Other prepayments and accrued income | 552 | 574 | |
| Total prepayments and accrued income | 890 | 962 | |
| Total assets | 103,665 | 104,376 |
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Note | |||
| Equity and liabilities | |||
| 20 | Equity | 39,620 | 38,864 |
| 21 | Subordinated loan capital | 2,575 | 2,906 |
| 22 | Insurance contract liabilities | 47,153 | 46,969 |
| 23 | Pensions and similar obligations | 62 | 57 |
| 24 | Deferred tax liabilities | 2,836 | 2,780 |
| 25 | Other provisions | 83 | 84 |
| Total provisions | 2,982 | 2,921 | |
| Amounts owed to credit institutions | 747 | 989 | |
| Repurchase agreement | 4,200 | 3,684 | |
| Derivative financial instruments | 1,361 | 1,048 | |
| 13 | Current tax liabilities | 636 | 887 |
| 27 | Other debt | 4,373 | 6,068 |
| Total debt | 11,316 | 12,677 | |
| Accruals and deferred income | 18 | 39 | |
| Total equity and liabilities | 103,665 | 104,376 |
- 1 General accounting policies
- 2 Risk and capital management
- 26 Earnings per share
- 28 Contractual obligations, collateral and contingent liabilities
- 29 Related parties
- 30 Share-based payment
- 31 Financial highlights
{130}------------------------------------------------
Statement of changes in equity
| Reserve for exchange rate adjust- | Other | Retained | Proposed | Non-controlling | Share-holders of | Additional | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DKKm | Share capital | menta) | reserves b) | earnings | dividend c) | interest | Tier 1 capital | Total equity | |
| Equity at 31 December 2024 | 3,082 | -2,633 | 4,361 | 31,864 | 1,202 | 1 | 37,877 | 987 | 38,864 |
| 2025 | |||||||||
| Profit/loss for the period | 159 | 157 | 5,024 | -1 | 5,338 | 67 | 5,405 | ||
| Other comprehensive income | 1,406 | 1 | 1,407 | 1,407 | |||||
| Total comprehensive income | 0 | 1,406 | 159 | 157 | 5,024 | -1 | 6,745 | 67 | 6,812 |
| Nullification of own shares | -25 | 25 | 0 | 0 | |||||
| Dividend paid | -4,972 | -4,972 | -4,972 | ||||||
| Dividend, own shares | 67 | 67 | 67 | ||||||
| Interest paid on additional Tier 1 capital | 0 | -67 | -67 | ||||||
| Purchase and sale of own shares | -1,803 | -1,803 | -1,803 | ||||||
| Issue of additional Tier 1 capital | 0 | 668 | 668 | ||||||
| Share-based payment | 52 | 52 | 52 | ||||||
| Total changes in equity in 2025 | -25 | 1,406 | 159 | -1,502 | 51 | -1 | 88 | 668 | 756 |
| Equity at 31 December 2025 | 3,057 | -1,227 | 4,520 | 30,361 | 1,253 | 0 | 37,964 | 1,655 | 39,620 |
| Equity at 31 December 2023 | 3,174 | -1,796 | 4,547 | 32,263 | 1,174 | 1 | 39,364 | 987 | 40,351 |
| 2024 | |||||||||
| Profit/loss for the period | -186 | 84 | 4,844 | 4,742 | 73 | 4,816 | |||
| Other comprehensive income | -837 | -1 | -838 | -838 | |||||
| Total comprehensive income | 0 | -837 | -186 | 83 | 4,844 | 0 | 3,905 | 73 | 3,978 |
| Nullification of own shares | -92 | 92 | 0 | 0 | |||||
| Dividend paid | -4,816 | -4,816 | -4,816 | ||||||
| Dividend, own shares | 76 | 76 | 76 | ||||||
| Interest paid on additional Tier 1 capital | 0 | -73 | -73 | ||||||
| Purchase and sale of own shares | -707 | -707 | -707 | ||||||
| Share-based payment | 56 | 56 | 56 | ||||||
| Total changes in equity in 2024 | -92 | -837 | -186 | -400 | 28 | 0 | -1,487 | 0 | -1,487 |
| Equity at 31 December 2024 | 3,082 | -2,633 | 4,361 | 31,864 | 1,202 | 1 | 37,877 | 987 | 38,864 |
a) Exchange rate adjustments of foreign entities deducted, Hedging of currency risk in foreign entities and Tax on hedging of currency risk in foreign entities.
b) The contingency fund provisions (Norwegian Natural perils Pool, Swedish- and Danish- contingency funds) can be used to cover losses in connection with the settlement of insurance provisions or otherwise for the benefit of the insured and are not available for dividends. The possible payment of dividend from Tryg Forsikring A/S to Tryg A/S is influenced by contingency fund provisions of DKK 4,361m on 31 December 2024).
c) Proposed dividend per share is calculated as the total dividend proposed divided by the total number of shares at the end of the year 611,374,322 shares.
{131}------------------------------------------------
Cash flow statement
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Cash flow from operating activities | ||
| Insurance revenue received | 40,570 | 38,886 |
| Insurance service expenses paid | -31,495 | -31,436 |
| Net expenses from reinsurance contracts | -600 | -663 |
| Cash flow from insurance activities | 8,475 | 6,786 |
| Interest income | 1,311 | 1,291 |
| Interest expense | -295 | -392 |
| Dividend received | 69 | 155 |
| Corporate taxes | -2,155 | -1,365 |
| Other income and costs | -537 | -826 |
| Total cash flow from operating activities | 6,869 | 5,649 |
| Cash flow from Investment activities | ||
| Purchase/sale of equity investments and unit trust units | 1,185 | 6,771 |
| Purchase/sale of bonds (net) | -113 | -6,084 |
| Purchase/sale of intangible assets | -487 | -819 |
| Purchase/sale of operating equipment (net) | 0 | -9 |
| Acquisition/sale of associate | 1 | -31 |
| Sale of investment property | 416 | 38 |
| Hedging of currency risk | -189 | 262 |
| Total cash flow from investment activities | 812 | 129 |
| Cash flow from financing activities | ||
| Purchase and sale of own shares (net) | -1,803 | -707 |
| Subordinated loan capital | 239 | 0 |
| Dividend paid | -4,972 | -4,816 |
| Change in lease liabilities | -182 | -210 |
| Change in amounts owed to credit institutions | -242 | -1,039 |
| Total cash flow from financing activities | -6,959 | -6,772 |
| Change in cash and cash equivalents, net | 722 | -994 |
| Exchange rate adjustment of cash and cash equivalents, 1 January | 19 | -16 |
| Change in cash and cash equivalents, gross | 741 | -1,009 |
| Cash and cash equivalents at 1 January | 2,123 | 3,132 |
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | 2,864 | 2,123 |
DKKm
| Liabilities arising from financing activities | Amountsowed to | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Subordinated | credit | ||
| 2025 | loansa) | institutions | Total |
| Carrying amount at 1 January | 3,894 | 989 | 4,881 |
| Exchange rate adjustments | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| Amortisation | -2 | 0 | -2 |
| Cash flow | 239 | -242 | -2 |
| Carrying amount at 31 December | 4,231 | 747 | 4,977 |
| 2024 | |||
| Carrying amount at 1 January | 4,018 | 2,028 | 6,045 |
| Exchange rate adjustments | -126 | 0 | -126 |
| Amortisation | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Cash flow | 0 | -1,039 | -1,039 |
Carrying amount at 31 December 3,894 989 4,881
a) hereof is DKK 1,655m recognised as equity cf. note 20
{132}------------------------------------------------
1 General accounting policies
The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with the IFRS Accounting Standards as adopted by the EU on 31 December 2025 and the additional Danish disclosure requirements of the Danish Insurance Business Act on annual reports prepared by listed financial services companies. The parent company financial statements are prepared in accordance with the executive order on financial reports presented by insurance companies and lateral pension funds issued by the Danish FSA. The deviations from the recognition and measurement requirements of IFRS Accounting Standards are:
• The Danish FSA's executive order allows not to provide for deferred tax of contingency reserves allocated from untaxed funds.
Changes in accounting policies
Tryg has changed the presentation of externally given inflation assumptions measured as a part of the insurance contract liabilities. The inflation assumptions relates to the longtailed lines; "workers compensation", "Swedish personal accident" and "motor third-party liability". Tryg defines the externally given inflation as a financial risk rather than an insurance risk according to the accounting policy choice in IFRS 17. Prior to the change, changes in externally given inflation, was presented as part of the line item "Insurance service expenses" in the insurance service result. Going forward, changes in externally given inflation assumptions will be classified as part of the line item "Net finance income/ expense from insurance contracts" in the net investment result. Following the updated hedging strategy of inflation risk accounting policy is changed to reflect the business model and to avoid accounting mismatch.
| Restated | Reported | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DKKm | 2024 | Change | 2024 | |
| Insurance service expenses | -32,171 | -268 | -31,902 | |
| Insurance service result | 7,056 | -268 | 7,324 | |
| Net finance income/expenses from insurance contracts | -747 | 268 | -1,016 | |
| Net investment result | 911 | 268 | 643 | |
| Profit/loss for the period | 4,816 | 0 | 4,816 | |
| Total equity | 38,864 | 0 | 38,864 | |
Aforementioned change will have no impact on profit or loss for the period or equity hence it is only a presentational change.
Furthermore, the operating segments prior disclosed as "Commercial" and "Corporate" has been merged into one operating segment and disclosed as "Commercial" going forward.
Comparative figures have been restated accordingly. Except as noted above, the accounting policies have been applied consistently with last year.
Accounting regulation
Implementation of changes to IFRS Accounting Standards and interpretations in 2025
The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) has issued amendments to the IFRS Accounting Standards, and the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (IFRIC) has also minor amendments to some interpretations.
Tryg Group has assessed the amendments and no standards or changes have been implemented for the period that began on 1 January 2025 that will have a significant impact on the Group.
IFRS Accounting Standards and interpretations not yet in force but which could affect the group significantly:
IFRS 18 (Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements) was issued in April 2024 by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and is not yet in force. IFRS 18 was issued to improve reporting of financial performance by introducing new mandatory requirements for the income statement and disclosure requirements for managementdefined performance measures (MPM's). IFRS 18 will supersede IAS 1 and is effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027.
The significant requirements introduced in IFRS 18 are:
- Presentation of the income statement in the following five categories: operating, investing, financing, taxes and discontinued operations
- New mandatory subtotals in the income statement: operating profit and profit before financing and income tax
{133}------------------------------------------------
1 General accounting policies (continued)
Tryg Group has preliminary assessed the impact of the standard and IFRS 18 will have no impact on profit or loss for the period or equity on implementation. The group is still assessing the presentational impact of the income statement and disclosure of MPM's.
Significant accounting estimates and assessments
The preparation of financial statements under IFRS Accounting Standards requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates and requires management to exercise its judgement in the process of applying the Group's accounting policies. The areas involving more judgement or complexity, or areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the consolidated financial statements are:
- Insurance and reinsurance contracts (ref. section below)
- Fair value of financial assets and liabilities, further described in note 18
- Measurement of Goodwill, Trademarks and Customer relations, further described in note 14
Insurance and reinsurance contracts
The PAA is basically a simplified version of the GMM which may be used if a number of conditions have been met.
Generally speaking, the key differences between the two methods are, for example, that the PAA involves simpler calculation of provisions for the remaining coverage period in line with the previous policies as well as fewer reporting requirements.
The PAA may be used for insurance contracts with a coverage period of one year or less as the effect of discounting on the provision for these will be limited. However, the PAA can also be used for insurance contracts with a coverage period of more than one year, provided it can be documented that measurement of technical provisions according to the PAA will not produce a materially different result than measurement according to the GMM.
The Tryg Group recognises all policies with a coverage period of one year or less under the PAA. The product groups Change of Ownership, Construction Policies and Affinity have contracts with a coverage period of more than one year. For these groups of contracts, eligibility tests have been carried out to assess whether the conditions for using the PAA have been met.
All product groups have proved to meet the conditions for using the PAA. Hence it has been assessed that the use of PAA will not produce a materially different result than measurement according to the GMM. Tryg has thus chosen to use the PAA for the entire insurance portfolio.
Estimates of insurance contracts liabilities and especially liability for incurred claims represent the Group's most critical accounting estimates, as these provisions involve several uncertainty factors. The measurement of insurance contract liabilities is subject to significant uncertainty arising from historical claims experience. This includes variability in both the timing and the magnitude of compensation expenses incurred during the coverage period. Such uncertainty is driven by factors including reporting delays, changes in settlement patterns, and fluctuations in claim severity. While estimates are based on historical data and actuarial assumptions, actual outcomes may differ materially from these projections, which could impact future financial results. Similarly, the estimation of recoveries from reinsurers may be significant.
Due to the inherent nature of estimates, the assumptions applied in determining claims provisions may prove to be incomplete, and unforeseen future events or circumstances may arise. Examples include changes in legislation, regulatory requirements, or court decisions. Furthermore, alternative assumptions or methodologies could lead to different estimates.
Claims provisions relate to reported but unpaid claims as of the balance sheet date and are determined based on individual assessments. At the reporting date, the company does not possess all necessary information regarding these claims, which may result in subsequent run-off gains or losses. To address this, the provisions include a management estimate based on historical experience. However, there is uncertainty as to whether this estimate will correspond to the actual development of claims.
Changes in the following key assumptions may change the fulfilment cash flows materially:
- assumptions about the contract boundary;
- assumptions about level of aggregation;
- assumptions about claims development; and
- assumptions about discount rates, including any illiquidity premiums.
{134}------------------------------------------------
Notes
1 General accounting policies (continued)
Fulfilment cash flows comprise:
- estimates of future cash flows;
- an adjustment to reflect the time value of money and the financial risks related to future cash flows, to the extent that the financial risks are not included in the estimates of future cash flows;
- and a risk adjustment for non-financial risk.
The expected fulfilment cash flows are similarly applied to reinsurance contract assets.
The sensitivity of the key assumptions and the underlying assumptions and development of discount rates are disclosed in note 2.
Consolidation
Consolidated financial statements
The consolidated financial statements comprise the financial statements of Tryg A/S (the parent company) and the enterprises (subsidiaries) controlled by the parent company. The parent company is regarded as controlling an enterprise when it:
- exercises a controlling influence over the relevant activities in the enterprise in question,
- is exposed to or has the right to a variable return on its investment, and
- can exercise its controlling influence to affect the variable return.
Enterprises in which the Group directly or indirectly holds between 20% and 50% of the voting rights and exercises significant influence but no controlling influence are classified as associates.
Basis of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements are prepared based on the financial statements of Tryg A/S and its subsidiaries. The consolidated financial statements are prepared by combining items of a uniform nature.
The financial statements used for the consolidation are prepared in accordance with the Group's accounting policies.
On consolidation, intra-group income and costs, intra-group accounts and dividends, and gains and losses arising on transactions between the consolidated enterprises are eliminated.
Items of subsidiaries are fully recognised in the consolidated financial statements.
Currency translation
A functional currency is determined for each of the reporting entities in the Group. Tryg's functional currencies are DKK, SEK, NOK, EUR, CHF and GBP. Transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are transactions in foreign currencies.
On initial recognition, transactions in foreign currencies are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rate applicable at the transaction date. Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated using the exchange rates applicable at the statement of financial position date. Translation differences are recognised in the income statement under value adjustments.
On consolidation, the assets and liabilities of the Group's foreign operations are translated using the exchange rates applicable at the statement of financial position date. Income and expense items are translated using the average exchange rates for the period.
Exchange rate differences arising on translation are classified as other comprehensive income and transferred to the Group's translation reserve.
Such translation differences are recognised as income or as expenses in the period in which the activities are divested. All other foreign currency translation gains and losses are recognised in the income statement.
The presentation currency in the annual report is DKK.
{135}------------------------------------------------
1 General accounting policies (continued)
Equity investments in Group undertakings
The parent company's equity investments in subsidiaries are recognised and measured using the equity method. The parent company's share of the enterprises' profits or losses after elimination of unrealised intra-group profits and losses is recognised in the income statement.
In the statement of financial position, equity investments are measured at the pro rata share of the enterprises' equity. Subsidiaries with a negative net asset value are recognised at zero value. Any receivables from these enterprises are written down by the parent company's share of such negative net asset value where the receivables are deemed irrecoverable.
If the negative net asset value exceeds the amount receivable, the remaining amount is recognised under provisions if the parent company has a legal or constructive obligation to cover the liabilities of the relevant enterprise.
Net revaluation of equity investments in subsidiaries is taken to reserve for net revaluation under equity if the carrying amount exceeds cost.
The results of foreign subsidiaries are based on translation of the items in the income statement using average exchange rates for the period unless they deviate significantly from the transaction day exchange rates. Income and costs in domestic enterprises denominated in foreign currencies are translated using the exchange rates applicable on the transaction date. Statement of financial position items of foreign subsidiaries are translated using the exchange rates applicable at the statement of financial position date.
When it is assessed that the parent company no longer has control over a subsidiary, it will be transferred to either assets held for sale or unquoted shares and when sold, it will be derecognised.
Insurance and reinsurance contract classification
Contracts under which Tryg accepts significant insurance risk are classified as insurance contracts. Contracts held by Tryg under which it transfers significant insurance risk related to underlying insurance contracts are classified as reinsurance contracts.
Insurance and reinsurance contracts also expose the Group to financial risk, but does not include any savings contracts.
To a limited extent Tryg also issues reinsurance contracts to compensate other insurers for claims arising from one or more insurance contracts issued by them.
Insurance contracts
Insurance and reinsurance contracts accounting treatment
Tryg assesses its non-life insurance and reinsurance products to determine whether they contain distinct components which must be accounted for under another IFRS Accounting Standard instead of under IFRS 17. After separating any distinct components, Tryg applies IFRS 17 to all remaining components of the insurance contract. Currently, Tryg's products do not include any distinct components that require separation. Some reinsurance contracts issued contain profit commission arrangements. Under these arrangements, there is a minimum guaranteed amount that the policyholder will always receive – either in the form of profit commission, or as claims, or another contractual payment irrespective of the insured event happening. The minimum guaranteed amounts have been assessed to be highly interrelated with the insurance component of the reinsurance contacts and are, therefore, non-distinct investment components which are not accounted for separately.
Presentation
Income and expenses from reinsurance contracts are presented separately from revenue and expenses from insurance contracts. Income and expenses from reinsurance contracts, other than insurance finance income or expenses, are presented as "Expenses from reinsurance contracts held" and "Income from reinsurance contracts held" in the Income Statement.
Portfolios of insurance contracts that are assets and those that are liabilities, and portfolios of reinsurance contracts that are assets and those that are liabilities, are presented separately in the statement of financial position. Any assets or liabilities recognised for cash flows arising before the recognition of the related group of contracts are included in the carrying amount of the related portfolios of contracts.
Tryg is subject to Solvency II capital requirements and regulation. The group's portfolios of
{136}------------------------------------------------
Notes
1 General accounting policies (continued)
insurance contracts are split in line of businesses on the basis of the Solvency II regulation.
Share capital
Shares are classified as equity when there is no obligation to transfer cash or other assets. Costs directly attributable to the issue of equity instruments are shown in equity as a deduction from the proceeds, net of tax.
Foreign currency translation reserve
Assets and liabilities of foreign entities are recognised using the exchange rate applicable at the statement of financial position date. Income and expense items are recognised using the average monthly exchange rates for the period. Any resulting differences are recognised in Other comprehensive income. When an entity is wound up or sold, the balance is transferred to the income statement. The hedging of the currency risk in respect of foreign entities is also offset in other comprehensive income in respect of the part that concerns the hedge.
Contingency fund reserves
Contingency fund reserves are recognised as part of other reserves under equity. The reserves may only be used when so permitted by the Danish Financial Supervisory Authority and when it is for the benefit of the policyholders. The Norwegian contingency fund reserves include provisions for the Norwegian Natural Perils Pool and security reserve. The Danish and Swedish provisions comprise contingency fund provisions. Deferred tax on the Norwegian and Swedish contingency fund reserves is deducted in the amounts presented.
Additional Tier 1 capital
Perpetual Additional Tier 1 capital with discretionary payment of interest and principal is recognised as equity for accounting purposes. Correspondingly, interest expenses relating to the issue of Perpetual Additional Tier 1 are recorded as dividend for accounting purposes. Interest is deducted from equity at the time of payment.
Dividends
Proposed dividend is part of equity until payment.
Own shares
The purchase and sale sums of own shares and dividends thereon are taken directly to retained earnings under equity. Own shares include shares acquired for incentive programmes and share buyback programme.
Proceeds from the sale of own shares in connection with the matching shares are taken directly to equity.
Cash flow statement
The consolidated cash flow statement is presented using the direct method and shows cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities as well as the Group's cash and cash equivalents at the beginning and end of the financial year. No separate cash flow statement has been prepared for the parent company because it is included in the consolidated cash flow statement. Cash flows from operating activities are calculated whereby major classes of gross cash receipts and gross cash payments are disclosed.
Cash flows from investing activities comprise payments in connection with the purchase and sale of intangible assets, property, plant and equipment as well as financial assets and deposits with credit institutions.
Cash flows from financing activities comprise changes in the size or composition of Tryg's share capital and related costs as well as the raising of loans, repayments of interestbearing debt and the payment of dividends.
Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash and demand deposits.
Other
The amounts in the report are disclosed in whole numbers of DKKm, unless otherwise stated. The amounts have been rounded and consequently the sum of the rounded amounts and totals may differ slightly.
Refer to the notes in the Financial Statements for other material accounting policies.
{137}------------------------------------------------
2 Risk and capital management
Risk management in Tryg
The Supervisory Board defines the basis for the risk appetite through the business model and the current strategy. The Supervisory Board has regulated the management of risk activities through policies and guidelines to the business supported by underlying business processes and a power of attorney structure. The company's risk management forms the basis for the risk profile being in line with the specified risk appetite at all times. Tryg's risk profile is continuously measured, quantified and reported to the management and the Supervisory Board.
In Tryg, we have adopted a three lines governance model across the organisation. This is to ensure robust governance and effective communication between the business areas, key function and internal audit as well as reporting to the Supervisory Board and the Supervisory Board's Risk Committee.
- 1st line is the Business Management
- 2nd line is Compliance-, Actuarial- and Risk Management function
- 3rd line is Internal Audit and Internal Audit function
The 1st line consists of the Business Management:
The business areas and group functions are responsible for the daily risk management and for carrying out every day work based on Tryg's policies and instructions regarding the management of risks and are responsible for being compliant with both internal and external requirements. This means that there must be procedures and guidelines in place for vital areas, and that internal controls are carried out in such a way that risks are identified in a timely manner and necessary risk mitigation activities are implemented.
The 2nd line consists of the Compliance-, Actuarial- and Risk Management function:
The compliance function is an independent function in the second line of defense with the responsibility for monitoring, control and reporting of compliance risks outside of the dayto-day operations and supporting the Supervisory Board and the Executive Board and management with assessing and reporting on compliance. The key responsibility of the actuarial function is to ensure and assess the adequacy of the provisions.
The risk management function is responsible for the facilitation and, monitoring of effective risk management practices and reporting of adequate risk-related information throughout the organisation.

{138}------------------------------------------------
Notes
2 Risk and capital management (continued)
The risk management function ensures a consistent approach to risk identification across the organisation, risk assessment of the most significant risks at Group level and reporting to the Supervisory Board.
Furthermore, the function prepares specific recommendations in relation to capital management, reinsurance, investment risk management and more.
The functions in the second line must have an overview of business processes and risks across the organisation.

The 3rd line consists of Internal Audit and Internal Audit function:
The third line must ensure an independent and objective audit of the organisation's internal controls, risk management and governance processes. Internal audit reports independently to the Supervisory Board and to its Audit Committee.
The Supervisory Board has organised their own Risk Committee consisting of 4 members of the Supervisory Board. In addition to these 4 members, the Chief Financial Officer, Chief Risk Officer, Chief Compliance Officer and the Senior Vice President Group Legal attend the meetings in the Committee.
The Supervisory Board's Risk Committee was established to ensure that all risk and capital related topics are discussed thoroughly before discussed in the Supervisory Board.
Capital management
Tryg's capital management is based on the key business objectives:
- A solid capital base, supporting both the statutory requirements and a single 'A' rating from Moody's.
- Support of a steadily increasing nominal dividend per share, with an ambition af a payout ratio in the interval 60-90% (of operating earnings)
Tryg's capital base currently consist of Tier 1 and 2 capital, such as shareholders' equity and subordinated loans.
The capital base is continuously measured against the capital requirement calculated based on Tryg's partial internal model, where insurance risks are modelled using an internal model, while other risks are described using the standard formula.
The model determines Tryg's required capital with a 99.5% confidence level over a 1-year horizon, which means that Tryg will be able to fulfil its obligations in 199 out of 200 years. The partial internal model has been used for several years and was approved by the Danish Financial Supervisory Authority (DFSA) in December 2015. A major model change was last approved by DFSA in October 2023.
Monitoring of the capital base also involves capital projections based on expected business plans within the strategic planning period and selected stress scenarios.
Company's Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA)
ORSA is the company's own risk and solvency assessment based on the Solvency II principles, which implies that Tryg must assess all material risks that the company is or may be exposed to. The ORSA report also contains an assessment of whether the calculation of solvency capital requirement is reasonable and is reflecting Tryg's actual risk profile.
{139}------------------------------------------------
2 Risk and capital management (continued)
Tryg's risk activities are implemented via continuous risk management processes, where the main results are reported to the Supervisory Board and its Risk Committee during the year. Therefore, the ORSA report is an annual summary document assessing all these processes.
Insurance risk
Insurance risk comprises two main types of risks: Underwriting risk and reserving risk.
Sensitivity analysis
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Effect of 1% change in: | |||
| Combined ratio (1 percentage point) | +/- 415 | +/- 400 | |
| Large single loss | -200 | -200 | |
| Catastrophe event | -300 | -300 |
Underwriting risk
Underwriting risk refers to the possibility that insurance premiums may not be adequate to cover compensations and other costs related to the insurance business. This risk is primarily managed through the company's insurance policy, which is defined by the Supervisory Board and implemented via business procedures and underwriting guidelines. Tryg assesses underwriting risk using its capital model to determine the capital impact of insurance products.
Reinsurance is employed to mitigate underwriting risk when it cannot be sufficiently reduced through standard diversification. As of 1 January 2026, the main components of Tryg's reinsurance program include:
-
Large Claims: Tryg is protected by reinsurance on a per-risk basis for large claims incidents involving damage to buildings and contents/business interruption. The retention for these large claims is DKK 200m.
-
Major Events like natural perils: For significant incidents involving damage to buildings and contents/business interruption etc, Tryg's reinsurance program offers protection for losses defined by the Solvency II Standard Scenario, equivalent to a 1 in 200-year event. The retention for such events is DKK 300m.
-
Credit/Surety: Tryg's retention is 30% of DKK 500m for Credit, and for larger Surety clients the %-retention is adjusted to a maximum estimated loss of DKK 60m, however nominal maximum of DKK 120m for certain bond types.
-
Other Lines: There is also reinsurance coverage for other lines with a retention of DKK 100m.
The use of reinsurance introduces counterparty risk, which is managed by engaging a diverse range of reinsurers with suitable ratings and adequate capital levels, as defined by the Supervisory Board.
Concentration of underwriting risk
The geographical concentration of the Group's liabilities for incurred claims is noted below. The disclosure is based on the countries where the business is written.
| DKKm | 2025 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denmark | Sweden | Norway | Other | Total | |
| Income protection | 8,546 | 8,136 | 3,412 | 0 | 20,094 |
| Motor | 1,609 | 7,422 | 813 | 0 | 9,844 |
| Property | 2,052 | 2,200 | 1,376 | 0 | 5,628 |
| Liability | 1,622 | 701 | 427 | 0 | 2,750 |
| Other | 1,357 | 520 | 724 | 103 | 2,704 |
| Total | 15,186 | 18,979 | 6,752 | 103 | 41,020 |
| 2024 | |||||
| Income protection | 8,793 | 8,078 | 3,065 | 0 | 19,936 |
| Motor | 1,453 | 6,909 | 840 | 0 | 9,202 |
| Property | 2,309 | 2,699 | 1,572 | 0 | 6,581 |
| Liability | 1,620 | 656 | 501 | 0 | 2,777 |
| Other | 1,726 | 168 | 373 | 184 | 2,451 |
| Total | 15,901 | 18,511 | 6,351 | 184 | 40,947 |
{140}------------------------------------------------
2 Risk and capital management (continued)
Reserving risk
Reserving risk relates to the risk of Tryg's insurance provisions being inadequate. The Supervisory Board lays down the overall framework for the handling of reserving risk in the insurance policy, while the overall risk is measured in the capital model. The uncertainty associated with the calculation of claims reserves affects Tryg's results through the run-off on reserves.
Long-tailed reserves in particular are subject to interest rate and inflation risk. Interest rate risk is hedged by means of Tryg's match portfolio which is aligned to the discounted claims reserves. In order to manage the inflation risk of claims reserves, Tryg has mitigated the inflation risk through zero coupon inflation swaps. Tryg determines the claims reserves via statistical methods as well as assessments of individual claims.
At the end of 2025, Tryg's claims reserves net of reinsurance totalled DKK 38,956m (DKK 38,059m in 2024) with an average discounted duration of approximately 5.3 years (5.6 years in 2024) and average duration undiscounted 8.3 years (8.2 years in 2024).
Sensitivity analysis
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| 1% change in inflation on person-related lines of business | +/- 867 | +/- 915 |
| 10% error in the assessment of long-tailed lines of business | ||
| (workers' compensation, motor liability, liability, accident) | +/- 2,792 | +/- 2,734 |
{141}------------------------------------------------
2 Risk and capital management (continued)
Liability for incurred claims (LIC)
| Gross (DKKm) | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated accumulated claims | ||||||||||||
| End of year | 13,776 | 11,982 | 11,851 | 12,767 | 15,236 | 16,002 | 16,459 | 25,442 | 27,807 | 27,805 | 27,244 | |
| 1 year later | 13,710 | 11,827 | 11,939 | 13,469 | 15,259 | 15,810 | 20,188 | 24,743 | 26,950 | 26,739 | ||
| 2 year later | 13,679 | 11,756 | 12,145 | 13,433 | 15,225 | 16,787 | 18,522 | 24,700 | 27,312 | |||
| 3 year later | 13,602 | 11,886 | 12,046 | 13,445 | 16,189 | 17,171 | 18,469 | 24,749 | ||||
| 4 year later | 13,629 | 11,861 | 12,039 | 14,264 | 16,019 | 17,313 | 18,537 | |||||
| 5 year later | 13,611 | 11,830 | 12,704 | 14,140 | 15,982 | 16,826 | ||||||
| 6 year later | 13,578 | 12,311 | 12,592 | 14,107 | 16,054 | |||||||
| 7 year later | 14,000 | 12,381 | 12,648 | 14,183 | ||||||||
| 8 year later | 13,927 | 12,299 | 12,611 | |||||||||
| 9 year later | 13,889 | 12,206 | ||||||||||
| 10 year later | 13,852 | |||||||||||
| 13,852 | 12,206 | 12,611 | 14,183 | 16,054 | 16,826 | 18,537 | 24,749 | 27,312 | 26,739 | 27,244 | 210,313 | |
| Cumulative payments to date | -13,153 | -11,394 | -11,664 | -13,011 | -14,705 | -14,750 | -16,159 | -22,196 | -23,555 | -20,948 | -14,455 | -175,991 |
| Provisions before discounting, end of year | 698 | 812 | 947 | 1,172 | 1,350 | 2,076 | 2,378 | 2,553 | 3,757 | 5,791 | 12,788 | 34,323 |
| Discounting | -157 | -180 | -216 | -232 | -285 | -538 | -476 | -383 | -471 | -550 | -856 | -4,344 |
| Reserves from 2014 and prior years | 9,156 | |||||||||||
| Gross provisions for claims, end of year | 39,134 | |||||||||||
| Debt related to Liability for incurred claims (LIC) andother insurance liabilities | 1,885 |
The amounts in foreign currency in the table are translated to DKK using the exchange rate at 31 December 2025 to prevent the impact of exchange rate fluctuations.
{142}------------------------------------------------
2 Risk and capital management (continued)
Asset for incurred claims (AIC)
| Ceded business (DKKm) | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated accumulated claims | ||||||||||||
| End of year | 2,017 | 185 | 263 | 534 | 339 | 678 | 513 | 1,250 | 1,954 | 1,489 | 297 | |
| 1 year later | 1,824 | 229 | 360 | 586 | 410 | 754 | 591 | 814 | 1,043 | 969 | ||
| 2 year later | 1,856 | 225 | 354 | 610 | 431 | 676 | 477 | 771 | 1,320 | |||
| 3 year later | 1,837 | 219 | 364 | 620 | 421 | 621 | 447 | 698 | ||||
| 4 year later | 1,847 | 216 | 335 | 596 | 360 | 644 | 466 | |||||
| 5 year later | 1,860 | 216 | 327 | 564 | 436 | 678 | ||||||
| 6 year later | 1,852 | 216 | 256 | 553 | 503 | |||||||
| 7 year later | 1,848 | 216 | 341 | 679 | ||||||||
| 8 year later | 1,844 | 214 | 340 | |||||||||
| 9 year later | 1,848 | 213 | ||||||||||
| 10 year later | 1,835 | |||||||||||
| 1,835 | 213 | 340 | 679 | 503 | 678 | 466 | 698 | 1,320 | 969 | 297 | 7,998 | |
| Cumulative payments to date | -1,835 | -211 | -320 | -622 | -482 | -646 | -418 | -634 | -814 | -295 | -53 | -6,331 |
| Recoverable before discounting, end of year | 0 | 2 | 20 | 57 | 21 | 31 | 48 | 64 | 506 | 674 | 244 | 1,668 |
| Discounting | 0 | 0 | -1 | -2 | -1 | -2 | -3 | -2 | -17 | -19 | -11 | -57 |
| Reserves from 2014 and prior years | 128 | |||||||||||
| Recoverable for claims, end of year | 1,738 | |||||||||||
| Receivable related to Asset for incurred claims (AIC) | 326 |
The amounts in foreign currency in the table are translated to DKK using the exchange rate at 31 December 2025 to prevent the impact of exchange rate fluctuations.
{143}------------------------------------------------
2 Risk and capital management (continued)
Liability for incurred claims (LIC) and Asset for incurred claims (AIC)
| Net of reinsurance (DKKm) | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated accumulated claims | ||||||||||||
| End of year | 11,759 | 11,797 | 11,588 | 12,233 | 14,897 | 15,324 | 15,946 | 24,192 | 25,853 | 26,316 | 26,947 | |
| 1 year later | 11,886 | 11,598 | 11,578 | 12,883 | 14,849 | 15,056 | 19,597 | 23,929 | 25,907 | 25,770 | ||
| 2 year later | 11,823 | 11,532 | 11,792 | 12,823 | 14,795 | 16,111 | 18,045 | 23,929 | 25,992 | |||
| 3 year later | 11,765 | 11,666 | 11,682 | 12,826 | 15,768 | 16,551 | 18,022 | 24,051 | ||||
| 4 year later | 11,782 | 11,645 | 11,704 | 13,668 | 15,659 | 16,670 | 18,071 | |||||
| 5 year later | 11,751 | 11,614 | 12,376 | 13,577 | 15,545 | 16,148 | ||||||
| 6 year later | 11,726 | 12,095 | 12,336 | 13,554 | 15,551 | |||||||
| 7 year later | 12,152 | 12,165 | 12,307 | 13,504 | ||||||||
| 8 year later | 12,083 | 12,085 | 12,271 | |||||||||
| 9 year later | 12,041 | 11,993 | ||||||||||
| 10 year later | 12,016 | |||||||||||
| 12,016 | 11,993 | 12,271 | 13,504 | 15,551 | 16,148 | 18,071 | 24,051 | 25,992 | 25,770 | 26,947 | 202,315 | |
| Cumulative payments to date | -11,318 | -11,183 | -11,344 | -12,389 | -14,223 | -14,103 | -15,741 | -21,562 | -22,741 | -20,653 | -14,403 | -169,660 |
| Provisions before discounting, end of year | 698 | 810 | 928 | 1,115 | 1,328 | 2,045 | 2,330 | 2,489 | 3,251 | 5,117 | 12,544 | 32,655 |
| Discounting | -157 | -180 | -216 | -229 | -284 | -536 | -473 | -381 | -454 | -532 | -846 | -4,286 |
| Reserves from 2014 and prior years | 9,028 | |||||||||||
| Liability for incurred claims (LIC) and AIC end of year | 37,396 |
The amounts in foreign currency in the table are translated to DKK using the exchange rate at 31 December 2025 to prevent the impact of exchange rate fluctuations.
| Eiopa yield curves used on all contracts measured under PAA | 2025 | 2024 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Currency | 1 year | 5 years | 10 years | 20 years | 30 years | 1 year | 5 years | 10 years | 20 years | 30 years |
| DKK | 2.06 % | 2.47 % | 2.86 % | 3.21 % | 3.28 % | 2.22 % | 2.14 % | 2.26 % | 2.25 % | 2.38 % |
| SEK | 1.98 % | 2.47 % | 2.88 % | 3.11 % | 3.17 % | 2.25 % | 2.41 % | 2.63 % | 2.93 % | 3.05 % |
| NOK | 4.04 % | 3.99 % | 4.06 % | 3.95 % | 3.81 % | 4.30 % | 4.00 % | 3.94 % | 3.81 % | 3.70 % |
{144}------------------------------------------------
2 Risk and capital management (continued)
Investment risk
The overall framework for managing investment risk is defined by the Supervisory Board in Tryg's investment policy. In overall terms, Tryg's investment portfolio is divided into a match portfolio and a free portfolio. The match portfolio corresponds to the value of the discounted insurance contracts liabilities with the purpose of hedging the interest rate sensitivity as closely as possible. Tryg is monitoring and managing the risk of the Group's interest rate risk on a daily basis.
The free portfolio is subject to the framework defined by the Supervisory Board through the investment policy. The strategy of the free portfolio is to support Tryg's dividend policy and ROOF target. At the end of 2025, investment properties accounted for, 4.0% (including property funds) (5.4% in 2024) of the total investment assets.
Tryg operates its insurance business in other currencies than Danish kroner, Tryg is therefore exposed to currency risk. Tryg is primarily exposed to fluctuations in the other Scandinavian currencies due to its ongoing insurance activities. Cash flow from insurance revenue and gross claims in other currencies cause a natural currency hedge, for which reason other risk mitigation measures are not required for these activities. However, the part of tangible equity held in other currencies than Danish kroner will be exposed to currency risk. This risk is to a large degree hedged on an ongoing basis using currency swaps.
In addition to the above-mentioned risks, Tryg is exposed to credit, counterparty and concentration risk. These risks primarily relate to Tryg's investments in AAA-rated Nordic and European government and mortgage bonds. These risks are also managed through the investment policy and the framework for reinsurance defined in the insurance policy.
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity analysis | |||
| Interest rates | |||
| Effect of 1% increase in interest curve: | |||
| NOK: | |||
| Impact of interest-bearing securities | -124 | -121 | |
| Higher discounting of insurance contracts liabilities | 133 | 124 | |
| Net effect of interest rate rise | 9 | 3 | |
| SEK: | |||
| Impact of interest-bearing securities | -901 | -863 | |
| Higher discounting of insurance contracts liabilities | 1,124 | 1,106 | |
| Net effect of interest rate rise | 223 | 245 | |
| DKK, EUR and Other: | |||
| Impact of interest-bearing securities | -704 | -823 | |
| Higher discounting of insurance contracts liabilities | 543 | 623 | |
| Net effect of interest rate rise | -161 | -201 | |
| Equity market related to real estate exposure | |||
| 15% decline in equity market related to real estate exposure | -348 | -492 | |
| Currency market | |||
| Equity: | |||
| 15% decline in exposed currency (exclusive of EUR) relative to DKK | -812 | -211 | |
| Impact of derivatives | 812 | 211 | |
| Net impact of exchange rate decline | -1 | 0 | |
| Insurance service result per year: | |||
| Impact of 15% change in NOK exchange rates relative to DKK | +/- 174 | +/- 95 | |
Impact of 15% change in SEK exchange rates relative to DKK +/- 498 +/- 493
{145}------------------------------------------------
2 Risk and capital management (continued)
The notes below are based on Tryg's investment portfolio excluding the external customers share in 2024. In 2025 external customers share amount to DKK 0m.
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Bonds portfolio including interest derivatives | ||
| Duration 1 year or less | 21,638 | 23,308 |
| Duration 1 - 5 years | 19,240 | 20,849 |
| Duration 5 - 10 years | 14,260 | 8,932 |
| Duration more than 10 years | 2,773 | 1,964 |
| Total | 57,912 | 55,053 |
| Duration | 3.1 | 3.2 |
Equity investments
Equity exposure, including share derivatives and excluding shares related to property exposure, totals DKK 79m (DKK 88 in 2024). Unlisted equity investments are based on an estimated market price.
Exposure to currency risk
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assets and | Assets and | |||||
| debt | Hedge | Exposure | debt | Hedge | Exposure | |
| USD | 1,277 | -1,276 | 1 | 2,221 | -2,221 | 0 |
| EURa) | 1,192 | -1,198 | 6 | 1,868 | -208 | 1,660 |
| GBP | 454 | -495 | 41 | 365 | -369 | 4 |
| NOK | 1,882 | -1,873 | 9 | -542 | 657 | 115 |
| SEK | 1,749 | -1,706 | 43 | -705 | 599 | 106 |
| Other | 54 | -62 | 9 | 69 | -75 | 6 |
| Total | 108 | 1,892 |
a) Due to correlation between DKK and EUR the exposure limit is higher than all other currencies.
Credit risk
| 2025 | 2024 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bond portfolio by ratings | DKKm | % | DKKm | % |
| AAA | 56,868 | 94.0 | 56,776 | 95.2 |
| AA | 2,901 | 4.8 | 1,368 | 2.3 |
| A | 148 | 0.2 | 1,032 | 1.7 |
| BBB | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| BB | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| B or lower | 563 | 0.9 | 507 | 0.8 |
| Total | 60,481 | 100.0 | 59,683 | 100.0 |
| Reinsurance balances | ||||
| AAA to A | 2,041 | 98.9 | 2,825 | 97.8 |
| Not rated | 22 | 1.1 | 63 | 2.2 |
| Total | 2,064 | 100.0 | 2,888 | 100.0 |
The maximum exposure to credit risk from reinsurance contracts amount to DKK 326m (DKK 480m in 2024). In 2025 management performed impairment test of the receivables from reinsurance contracts. The total net impact of write-down and reversed write-down for 2025 amount to DKK 1m (DKK 4m in 2024).
Reinsurance is ceded across all geographic areas in which Tryg operates. Tryg does not have a significant concentration of credit risk with any single reinsurer.
At 31 December 2025, the maximum exposure to credit risk from insurance contracts amount to DKK 1,799m (DKK 2,026m in 2024), which primarily relates to premiums receivable for insurance services which the Group has already provided.
{146}------------------------------------------------
2 Risk and capital management (continued)
Operational risk
Operational risk relates to errors or failures in internal procedures, fraud, breakdown of infrastructure, IT security and similar factors including ICT risks. Tryg focuses on an adequate control environment for its operations to mitigate operational risk. In practice, this work is organised by means of procedures, controls and guidelines covering the various aspects of the Group's operations. The Supervisory Board defines the overall framework for managing operational risk in Tryg's Operational risk policy and in the Information Security Policy.
A special crisis management structure is set up to deal with the eventuality that Tryg is hit by major crisis.
This comprises a Crisis Management Team at Group level, national contingency teams at country level and finally business continuity teams in the individual areas. Tryg has prepared contingency plans to address the most important areas among these ensuring servicing of customers. In addition, comprehensive IT contingency plans have been established, primarily focusing on the business critical systems.
Other risks Strategic risk
The strategic risk is the risk of loss as a result of Tryg's chosen strategic position. The strategic position covers both business transactions, IT strategy, choice of business partners and changed market conditions. Tryg's strategic position is determined by Tryg's Supervisory Board in close collaboration with the Executive Board. Before determining the strategic position, the strategic decisions are subject to a risk assessment, explaining the risk of the chosen strategy to Tryg's Supervisory Board and Executive Board.
Compliance risk
A compliance risk is considered as a non financial risk and is a part of Trygs risk management set-up and framework. Compliance risk is defined as the risk of Tryg being subject to legal sanctions, authority sanctions, suffering financial losses or deterioration of reputation due to non-compliance with applicable laws, market standards or internal regulations. The Compliance function controls, assess and reports whether Tryg's methods and procedures for complying with the legislation are reliable and function effectively. The compliance function conducts a risk assessment annually and identifies the areas to be reviewed in the coming years. The Compliance function continuously identify and assess compliance risks until they are sufficiently mitigated. In addition, the Compliance function also facilities Tryg's ongoing training in compliance matters, e.g. Code of conduct and GDPR training as part of the mandatory compliance training courses.
Emerging risk
Emerging risk covers both new risks and already known risks, with changing characteristics. The management of this type of risk is handled at a strategic level by the Supervisory Board and Executive Board, and also at an operational level by the individual business areas, which monitor the market and adapt the products as the conditions change.
{147}------------------------------------------------
2 Risk and capital management (continued)
Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk of loss as a result of not being able to meet payments when they fall due. For a non-life insurance company like Tryg, liquidity risk is practically non-existent, as premium payments fall due before claims payments. The majority of Tryg's investment portfolio are placed in AAA or AA rated bonds which can be either sold or repoed in a short-time span.
Maturity of the Group's financial obligations including interest
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DKKm | 0-1 year | 1-5 years | >5 years | Total | 0-1 year | 1-5 years | >5 years | Total |
| Subordinated loan capitala) | 158 | 632 | 4,155 | 4,945 | 181 | 725 | 4,719 | 5,625 |
| Amounts owed to credit institutions | 747 | 0 | 0 | 747 | 989 | 0 | 0 | 989 |
| Debt relating to repos | 4,200 | 0 | 0 | 4,200 | 3,684 | 0 | 0 | 3,684 |
| Other debt | 4,373 | 0 | 0 | 4,373 | 6,068 | 0 | 0 | 6,068 |
| Total | 9,477 | 632 | 4,155 | 14,264 | 10,922 | 725 | 4,719 | 16,366 |
a) Interest on loans for a perpetual term has been disclosed for the first fifteen years.
| DKKm | 0-1 year | 1-2 years | 2-3 years | 3-4 years | 4-5 years | >5 years | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expected cash flow from Insurance contracts liabilities and assets, not discounted | |||||||
| 2025 | |||||||
| Liabilities for incurred claims | 15,613 | 6,055 | 3,884 | 2,804 | 2,208 | 18,693 | 49,257 |
| Assets for incurred claims | -1,236 | -419 | -230 | -98 | -53 | -130 | -2,165 |
| 14,377 | 5,636 | 3,654 | 2,706 | 2,155 | 18,563 | 47,092 | |
| 2024 | |||||||
| Liabilities for incurred claims | 15,866 | 5,729 | 3,622 | 2,721 | 2,140 | 18,207 | 48,285 |
| Assets for incurred claims | -2,217 | -411 | -129 | -75 | -28 | -118 | -2,978 |
| 13,649 | 5,318 | 3,493 | 2,646 | 2,112 | 18,089 | 45,307 |
{148}------------------------------------------------
3 Operating segments
Accounting policy
Segment information is based on the Group's management and internal financial reporting and supports the management decisions on allocation of resources and assessment of the Group's results divided into segments. The Executive Board is considered chief operating decision maker. The segment reporting is based on the Group accounting policy.
As mentioned in note 1, changes in accounting policies, comparative figures have been restated.
The reportable operating segments in the Group are Private and Commercial. Private provides insurance products to private individuals in Denmark, Sweden and Norway. Commercial provides insurance products to small and mediumsized commercial and corporate customers in Denmark, Sweden and Norway. Group items encompasses acquired portfolios cf. table below.
Geographical information is presented based on the economic environment in which the Tryg Group operates in. The geographical areas are Denmark, Norway, Sweden and Other European countries.
Segment revenue and expenses as well as segment assets and liabilities comprise those items that can be directly attributed to each individual segment and those items that can be allocated to the individual segments on a reliable basis. Unallocated items primarily comprise assets and liabilities concerning investment activity managed at Group level.
{149}------------------------------------------------
Notes
3 Operating segments
2025 2024
| DKKm | Private | Commercial | Insurance service result inManagement'sReview | Group itemsa) | Group | Private | Commercial | Insurance service result inManagement'sReview | Group itemsa) | Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Insurance revenue | 27,525 | 12,831 | 40,356 | 1,159 | 41,515 | 26,100 | 12,496 | 38,596 | 1,378 | 39,974 |
| Gross claims | -18,891 | -7,320 | -26,210 | -1,159 | -27,369 | -18,193 | -7,403 | -25,596 | -1,378 | -26,975 |
| Insurance operating costs | -3,542 | -1,883 | -5,425 | 0 | -5,425 | -3,337 | -1,859 | -5,196 | 0 | -5,196 |
| Insurance service expenses | -22,433 | -9,203 | -31,636 | -1,159 | -32,795 | -21,530 | -9,262 | -30,792 | -1,378 | -32,171 |
| Net expense from reinsurance contracts | -161 | -614 | -775 | 0 | -775 | -323 | -425 | -748 | 0 | -748 |
| Insurance service result | 4,931 | 3,015 | 7,945 | 0 | 7,945 | 4,247 | 2,809 | 7,056 | 0 | 7,056 |
| Net investment result | 778 | 911 | ||||||||
| Other income and costs | -1,511 | -1,664 | ||||||||
| Profit/loss before tax | 7,212 | 6,303 | ||||||||
| Tax | -1,807 | -1,488 | ||||||||
| Profit/loss for the period | 5,405 | 4,816 | ||||||||
| Run-off gains/losses, net of reinsurance | 569 | 326 | 895 | 0 | 895 | 351 | 481 | 832 | 0 | 832 |
| Intangible assets | 27,366 | 2,062 | 0 | 1,970 | 31,398 | 26,683 | 2,242 | 0 | 1,768 | 30,692 |
| Equity investments in associates | 33 | 38 | ||||||||
| Assets from reinsurance contracts | 100 | 1,784 | 0 | 308 | 2,194 | 207 | 2,332 | 0 | 435 | 2,974 |
| Other assets | 70,039 | 70,671 | ||||||||
| Total assets | 103,665 | 104,376 | ||||||||
| Insurance contracts liabilities | 28,986 | 19,838 | 0 | -1,671 | 47,153 | 28,876 | 19,679 | 0 | -1,586 | 46,969 |
| Other liabilities | 16,892 | 18,542 | ||||||||
| Total liabilities | 64,045 | 65,512 |
a) IFRS 17 requires that Liability for incurred claims (LIC) acquired shall be presented as Insurance revenue. The reclassification refers to Insurance revenue and Gross claims relating to LIC from the Trygg-Hansa and Codan Norway acquisition. The presentation would have resulted in an artificial high Insurance revenue and Gross claims with no impact on the Insurance service result. Therefore, Tryg presents Insurance revenue and Gross claims in "Management's Review" without the reclassification as it gives a fair view of Insurance revenue, Gross claims as well as key ratios. This explains the difference between "Management's Review" and the Financial Statements. Key ratios are calculated based on the figures presented in "Management's Review".
Assets from reinsurance contracts and Insurance contracts liabilities allocated to segments pertain to debts and receivables from insurance contracts. Other assets and liabilities are managed at Group level and are not allocated to the individual segments.
{150}------------------------------------------------
4 Insurance service result by geography
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Danish general insurance | |||
| Insurance revenue | 18,565 | 18,207 | |
| Insurance service result | 3,267 | 3,307 | |
| Run-off gains/losses, net of reinsurance | 354 | 271 | |
| Key ratios | |||
| Gross claims ratio | 66.4 | 65.1 | |
| Net reinsurance ratio | 1.7 | 2.7 | |
| Claims ratio, net of reinsurance | 68.1 | 67.8 | |
| Expense ratio | 14.3 | 14.1 | |
| Combined ratio | 82.4 | 81.8 | |
| Run-off, net of reinsurance (%) | -1.9 | -1.5 | |
| Number of full-time employees, end of period | 3,321 | 3,154 | |
| Norwegian general insurance | |||
| NOK/DKK, average rate for the period | 63.74 | 64.30 | |
| Insurance revenue | 8,762 | 8,282 | |
| Insurance service result | 1,157 | 636 | |
| Run-off gains/losses, net of reinsurance | 149 | 114 | |
| Key ratios | |||
| Gross claims ratio | 73.1 | 76.3 | |
| Net reinsurance ratio | 1.8 | 3.1 | |
| Claims ratio, net of reinsurance | 74.8 | 79.5 | |
| Expense ratio | 11.9 | 12.9 | |
| Combined ratio | 86.8 | 92.3 | |
| Run-off, net of reinsurance (%) | -1.7 | -1.4 | |
| Number of full-time employees, end of period | 1,318 | 1,318 |
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Swedish general insurance | ||
| SEK/DKK, average rate for the period | 67.28 | 65.33 |
| Insurance revenue | 12,613 | 11,796 |
| Insurance service result | 3,323 | 3,032 |
| Run-off gains/losses, net of reinsurance | 378 | 434 |
| Key ratios | ||
| Gross claims ratio | 58.9 | 62.7 |
| Net reinsurance ratio | 1.6 | -1.2 |
| Claims ratio, net of reinsurance | 60.5 | 61.5 |
| Expense ratio | 13.2 | 12.8 |
| Combined ratio | 73.7 | 74.3 |
| Run-off, net of reinsurance (%) | -3.0 | -3.7 |
| Number of full-time employees, end of period | 2,023 | 2,085 |
| Other European countriesa) | ||
| Insurance revenue | 416 | 311 |
| Insurance service result | 199 | 81 |
| Run-off gains/losses, net of reinsurance | 15 | 14 |
| Number of full-time employees, end of period | 70 | 65 |
| Group itemsb) | ||
| Insurance revenue | 1,159 | 1,378 |
| Insurance service expenses | -1,159 | -1,378 |
| Insurance service result | 0 | 0 |
a) Comprises credit & surety insurance (Tryg Trade) in European countries besides Denmark, Norway and Sweden.
b) Reclassification relating to claims provisions from the Trygg-Hansa and Codan Norway acquisition. Please refer to note 3 operating segments.
{151}------------------------------------------------
4 Insurance service result by geography (continued)
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Group (Total) | ||
| Insurance revenue | 41,515 | 39,974 |
| Insurance service result | 7,945 | 7,056 |
| Net investment result | 778 | 911 |
| Other income and costs | -1,511 | -1,664 |
| Profit/loss before tax | 7,212 | 6,303 |
| Run-off gains/losses, net of reinsurance | 895 | 832 |
| Key ratios | ||
| Gross claims ratio | 64.9 | 66.3 |
| Net reinsurance ratio | 1.9 | 1.9 |
| Claims ratio, net of reinsurance | 66.9 | 68.3 |
| Expense ratio | 13.4 | 13.5 |
| Combined ratio | 80.3 | 81.7 |
| Run-off, net of reinsurance (%) | -2.2 | -2.2 |
| Number of full-time employees, end of period | 6,732 | 6,621 |
| Non-current assets by country | ||
| Denmark | 6,724 | 6,776 |
| Norway | 1,460 | 1,510 |
| Sweden | 24,083 | 23,350 |
| Other | 5 | 8 |
| Total | 32,272 | 31,643 |
{152}------------------------------------------------
5 Insurance service result by line of business
| Total Motor TPL and | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Motor comprehensive | comprehensive | |||||||||||
| Accident and health | Health care | Worker's compensation | Motor TPL | insurance | insurance | |||||||
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 |
| Gross premiums written | 6,995 | 6,914 | 904 | 846 | 1,009 | 1,052 | 2,796 | 2,742 | 9,550 | 9,430 | 12,346 | 12,172 |
| Insurance revenue | 7,154 | 6,813 | 896 | 824 | 1,015 | 1,046 | 2,881 | 2,779 | 9,591 | 9,153 | 12,473 | 11,932 |
| Gross claims | -4,093 | -3,680 | -637 | -622 | -789 | -559 | -2,532 | -2,024 | -6,444 | -7,088 | -8,976 | -9,112 |
| Insurance operating costs | -867 | -834 | -157 | -107 | -124 | -132 | -409 | -430 | -1,342 | -1,262 | -1,751 | -1,691 |
| Net expense from reinsurance contracts | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | -2 | -7 | -51 | 17 | -22 | -89 | -73 | -71 |
| Insurance service result | 2,197 | 2,305 | 102 | 96 | 99 | 349 | -110 | 342 | 1,782 | 715 | 1,672 | 1,057 |
| Gross claims ratio | 57.2 % | 54.0 % | 71.1 % | 75.4 % | 77.7 % | 53.4 % | 87.9 % | 72.8 % | 67.2 % | 77.4 % | 72.0 % | 76.4 % |
| Combined ratio | 69.3 % | 66.2 % | 88.6 % | 88.4 % | 90.2 % | 66.7 % | 103.8 % | 87.7 % | 81.4 % | 92.2 % | 86.6 % | 91.1 % |
| Claims frequencya) | 9.2 % | 8.7 % | 35.0 % | 37.6 % | 11.0 % | 9.8 % | 5.8 % | 4.9 % | 33.5 % | 36.6 % | 19.4 % | 20.8 % |
| Average claims DKKb) | 13,377 | 12,650 | 5,766 | 5,149 | 116,523 | 107,000 | 16,798 | 16,516 | 8,360 | 7,905 | 25,158 | 24,421 |
| Total claims | 333,739 | 314,150 | 108,575 | 120,833 | 7,210 | 6,570 | 135,206 | 116,801 | 757,314 | 866,173 | 892,520 | 982,974 |
| Marine, aviation andcargo insurance | Fire and contents(Private) | Fire and contents(Commercial) | Change of ownership | Liability insurance | Credit and guaranteeinsurance | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 |
| Gross premiums written | 188 | 193 | 8,827 | 8,992 | 4,386 | 4,270 | 15 | 19 | 1,811 | 1,774 | 1,020 | 902 |
| Insurance revenue | 193 | 194 | 9,110 | 8,842 | 4,403 | 4,195 | 22 | 15 | 1,812 | 1,714 | 1,011 | 900 |
| Gross claims | -63 | -62 | -6,380 | -6,170 | -2,128 | -2,424 | -18 | -7 | -892 | -883 | -297 | -165 |
| Insurance operating costs | -29 | -33 | -1,259 | -1,214 | -618 | -610 | -3 | 0 | -279 | -258 | -154 | -134 |
| Net expense from reinsurance contracts | -13 | -59 | -148 | -289 | -270 | -99 | 0 | 0 | -84 | 124 | -178 | -340 |
| Insurance service result | 89 | 41 | 1,323 | 1,168 | 1,388 | 1,063 | 1 | 8 | 556 | 698 | 382 | 262 |
| Gross claims ratio | 32.3 % | 31.9 % | 70.0 % | 69.8 % | 48.3 % | 57.8 % | 81.9 % | 44.1 % | 49.3 % | 51.5 % | 29.4 % | 18.3 % |
| Combined ratio | 54.2 % | 79.1 % | 85.5 % | 86.8 % | 68.5 % | 74.7 % | 95.7 % | 44.4 % | 69.3 % | 59.3 % | 62.3 % | 70.9 % |
| Claims frequencya) | 10.7 % | 14.4 % | 6.8 % | 7.1 % | 6.5 % | 7.2 % | 1.5 % | 2.3 % | 4.6 % | 5.6 % | 0.2 % | 0.3 % |
| Average claims DKKb) | 42,494 | 42,032 | 11,845 | 10,857 | 82,153 | 95,492 | 73,327 | 23,994 | 72,630 | 63,587 | 593,228 | 903,763 |
| Total claims | 2,166 | 3,078 | 542,429 | 574,873 | 26,289 | 29,898 | 220 | 252 | 13,297 | 15,176 | 494 | 653 |
a) The claims frequency is calculated as the number of claims in the year in proportion to the average number of insurance contracts in the year.
b) Average claims are total claims before run-off in the year relative to the number of claims in the year.
{153}------------------------------------------------
5 Insurance service result by line of business (continued)
| Tourist assistance | Total exclusive of Group | Group Life, one-year | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| insurance | Group itemsc) | Lifef) | policiesd) | Totale-f) | ||||||
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 |
| Gross premiums written | 1,671 | 1,263 | 0 | 0 | 39,171 | 38,397 | 872 | 918 | 40,043 | 39,315 |
| Insurance revenue | 1,385 | 1,222 | 1,159 | 1,378 | 40,634 | 39,075 | 881 | 900 | 41,515 | 39,974 |
| Gross claims | -1,072 | -991 | -1,159 | -1,378 | -26,504 | -26,051 | -866 | -924 | -27,369 | -26,975 |
| Insurance operating costs | -137 | -132 | 0 | 0 | -5,379 | -5,144 | -46 | -52 | -5,425 | -5,196 |
| Net expense from reinsurance contracts | -1 | -2 | 0 | 0 | -768 | -737 | -7 | -11 | -775 | -748 |
| Insurance service result | 175 | 97 | 0 | 0 | 7,983 | 7,143 | -38 | -87 | 7,945 | 7,056 |
| Gross claims ratio | 77.4 % | 81.1 % | 64.2 % | 65.5 % | 98.3 % | 102.6 % | 64.9 % | 66.3 % | ||
| Combined ratio | 87.3 % | 92.0 % | 79.8 % | 81.1 % | 104.3 % | 109.7 % | 80.3 % | 81.7 % | ||
| Claims frequencya) | 27.4 % | 25.7 % | ||||||||
| Average claims DKKb) | 5,534 | 5,484 | ||||||||
| Total claims | 197,515 | 194,102 |
c) Please refer to note 3 regarding "Group items"
d) Group Life one-year policies related to Norway and Denmark
e) Claims prevention cost totalled 1% of claims cost (1% in 2024) and primarily related to Fire & contents (Private) but also Fire and contents (Commercial), Healthcare, Motor comprehensive and Accident and health
f) Key ratios are calculated based on the figures excluding amounts under "Group items"
{154}------------------------------------------------
Notes
6 Insurance revenue
Accounting policy
The insurance revenue for the period is the amount of expected premium receipts (excluding any investment component) allocated to the period. Tryg allocates the expected premium receipts to each period of insurance contract services on the basis of the passage of time. If the expected pattern of release of risk during the coverage period differs significantly from the passage of time, then the allocation is made based on the expected timing of incurred insurance service expenses.
Tryg changes the basis of allocation between the two methods above as necessary, if facts and circumstances change. The change is accounted for prospectively as a change in accounting estimate.
For the periods presented, revenue has primarily been recognised on the basis of the passage of time.
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Insurance revenue | ||
| Direct insurance, by location of risk | ||
| Denmark | 18,545 | 18,183 |
| Other EU countriesa) | 14,172 | 13,494 |
| Other countriesb) | 8,712 | 8,217 |
| Direct insurance total | 41,429 | 39,894 |
| Indirect insurance | 86 | 80 |
| Insurance revenue total | 41,515 | 39,974 |
a) Primarily Sweden
b) Primarily Norway
7 Insurance service expenses
Accounting policy
Insurance service expenses arising from insurance contracts are recognised in profit or loss generally as they are incurred, excluding repayments of investment components and comprise the following items:
- Incurred claims
- Insurance acquisition cash flows:
- Losses on onerous contracts and reversals of such losses, cf. note 22
- Adjustments to the liabilities for incurred claims that do not arise from the effects of the time value of money, financial risk and changes therein
- Other insurance service expenses
As mentioned in note 1, changes in accounting policies, comparative figures have been restated.
Incurred claims
Claims are claims incurred during the year. Incurred claims include run-off gains/losses in respect of previous years. The portion which can be ascribed to unwinding and/or change in discount rates is transferred to insurance finance income and expenses.
Incurred claims include direct and indirect claims handling costs, including costs of inspecting and assessing claims, costs to prevent, control and mitigate damage and other direct and indirect costs associated with the handling of claims incurred in relation insurance contracts in force.
Incurred claims comprise bonus and premiums discounts based on defined claims experience set prior to the period where the insurance contract was incepted or sold.
Tryg disaggregates changes in the risk adjustment for non-financial risk between the insurance service result and insurance finance income or expenses. Changes relating to the risk adjustment for non-financial risk are included in the insurance service result while discounting and externally given inflation effects are included in Net finance income/expenses from insurance contracts.
{155}------------------------------------------------
7 Insurance service expenses (continued)
Insurance acquisition cash flows
Insurance acquisition cash flows arise from the costs of selling, underwriting and starting a group of insurance contracts (issued or expected to be issued) that are directly attributable to the portfolio of insurance contracts to which the group belongs.
Tryg chooses to expense insurance acquisition cash flows as they occur for contracts measured under the PAA, if the coverage period for each contract in a group is one year or less.
Other insurance service expenses
Other insurance service expenses represent administration expenses to administrate insurance contracts in force. Administration expenses are all other incurred expenses attributable to the administration of existing contracts. Expenses relating to future contracts or expenses that cannot be directly attributed to the portfolio of insurance contracts e.g. some development and educational costs are expensed as 'Other costs' as they incur.
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Gross claims | -27,369 | -26,975 |
| Insurance operating costs | ||
| Acquisition costs | -3,345 | -3,531 |
| Administration expenses | -2,080 | -1,665 |
| Insurance operating costs, gross | -5,425 | -5,196 |
| Insurance service expenses | -32,795 | -32,171 |
| Fees to the auditors recognised in insurance service expenses | ||
| PricewaterhouseCoopers, appointed by the annual general meeting | -9 | -9 |
| -9 | -9 | |
| The fee is divided into: | ||
| Statutory audit | -6 | -6 |
| Other audit assignments | -1 | -1 |
| Tax advice | 0 | -1 |
| Other services | -1 | 0 |
| -9 | -9 |
Fees for non-audit services provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers to the Group amount to DKK 1m (DKK 1m in 2024) and consists of general advice related to tax, accounting and ESG.
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Insurance operating costs, gross, classified by type | ||
| Commissions | -433 | -366 |
| Staff expenses | -3,614 | -3,460 |
| Office expenses, fees and headquarter expenses | -636 | -626 |
| IT operating and maintenance costs, software expenses and fees | -907 | -878 |
| Depreciation, amortisation and impairment losses and write-downs | -169 | -185 |
| Other income | 333 | 318 |
| -5,425 | -5,196 |
Please refer to note 15 and note 27 for leases recognised according to IFRS 16.
| Total staff expenses | ||
|---|---|---|
| -- | -- | ---------------------- |
| -6,038 | -5,896 | |
|---|---|---|
| Other social security costs and payroll tax | -1,000 | -924 |
| Pension, contribution plans | -618 | -623 |
| Recognised expenses related to share-based payment | -56 | -58 |
| Salaries and wages | -4,364 | -4,291 |
Total staff expenses are recognised in Insurance service expenses (gross claims and insurance operating costs), in investment activities and in other costs.
Please refer to note 29 for specification of Remuneration for the Supervisory Board and Executive Board.
| Average number of full-time employees during the year | 6,839 | 6,758 |
|---|---|---|
| ------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- |
{156}------------------------------------------------
Notes
8 Interest and dividends
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Interest income and dividends | ||
| Dividends | 69 | 155 |
| Interest income, bonds | 1,350 | 1,426 |
| Interest income, other | 56 | 52 |
| 1,476 | 1,633 | |
| Interest expenses | ||
| Interest expenses from subordinated loan capital, credit Institutions and | ||
| cash at bank | -158 | -181 |
| Interest expenses, other | -137 | -211 |
| -295 | -392 | |
| 1,180 | 1,241 |
9 Value adjustments
Accounting policy
Income from investment properties before fair value adjustment represents the profit from property operations less property management expenses. Interest and dividends represent interest earned and dividends received during the financial year and are recognised as a separate line item in the income statement.
Coupon on bond designated as fair value through profit or loss is recognised as interest and not part of the fair value adjustments.
Realised and unrealised investment gains and losses, including gains and losses on derivative financial instruments, value adjustment of investment property, foreign currency translation adjustments and the effect of movements in the yield curve used for discounting, are recognised as value adjustments. Investment management charges represent expenses relating to the management of investments including salary and management fees on the investment area.
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Value adjustments concerning financial assets or liabilities at fair value with value adjustment in theincome statement: | ||
| Equity investments | -285 | -261 |
| Unit trust units | 55 | 751 |
| Bondsa) | 340 | 295 |
| Derivatives (Interest, currency and inflation) | 221 | -111 |
| 332 | 673 | |
| Value adjustments concerning assets or liabilities that cannot be attributed to IFRS 9: | ||
| Investment property | -13 | -28 |
| Other statement of financial position itemsb) | -228 | -86 |
| -241 | -114 | |
| 91 | 559 |
- a) Value adjustment on financial instruments designated at fair value through profit or loss amounts DKK 210m (DKK 259m in 2024)
- b) Exchange rate adjustments concerning financial assets or liabilities which cannot be stated at fair value total DKK -171m (DKK -57m in 2024)
{157}------------------------------------------------
10 Net finance income/expenses from insurance contracts
Accounting policy
Insurance finance income and expenses comprise changes in the carrying amounts of groups of insurance and reinsurance contracts and arising from the effects of the time value of money, financial risk including externally given inflation and changes therein.
Moreover, Insurance finance income and expenses comprise changes in the carrying amounts risk adjustment for non financial risks and arising from the effects of the time value of money, financial risk and changes therein.
Reinsurance contracts are presented separately from insurance contracts cf. note 11
As mentioned in note 1, changes in accounting policies, comparative figures have been restated.
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Changed discount rate | 684 | 370 |
| Unwinding | -1,016 | -1,125 |
| Exchange rate adjustment from insurance contracts | -7 | 7 |
| -339 | -747 |
11 Net finance income/expenses from reinsurance contracts
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Changed discount rate | -3 | 10 |
| Unwinding | 42 | 75 |
| Exchange rate adjustment from reinsurance contracts | -34 | 39 |
| 5 | 124 |
12 Other income and costs
Accounting policy
Other income and costs include income and expenses which cannot be ascribed to the Group´s insurance portfolio or investment assets eg. development and educational costs, sale of pension products and amortisation of intangible assets identified in Business combinations.
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Include income and costs which cannot be directly ascribed to the insurance portfolio or investmentassets | ||
| Other income | ||
| Income related to the sale of non-insurance products | 115 | 121 |
| Other income | 0 | 11 |
| 115 | 132 | |
| Other costs | ||
| Amortisation of customer relations | -898 | -934 |
| Costs related to the sale of non-insurance products | -150 | -153 |
| Other costsa) | -578 | -709 |
| -1,626 | -1,796 | |
| -1,511 | -1,664 |
a) Hereof DKK 159m related to IT investments and restructuring costs in 2025 (DKK 180m in 2024)
{158}------------------------------------------------
Notes
13 Tax
Accounting policy
Income tax
The Group expenses current tax according to the tax laws of the jurisdictions in which it operates. Current tax liabilities and current tax receivables are recognised in the statement of financial position as estimated tax on the taxable income for the year, adjusted for change in tax on prior years' taxable income and for tax paid under the onaccount tax scheme. Current tax assets are receivables concerning tax for the year adjusted for on-account payments and any prior-year adjustments.
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Tax on accounting profit/loss | 1,875 | 1,639 |
| Difference between Danish and foreign tax rates | -153 | -141 |
| Tax adjustment, previous years | 47 | -17 |
| Adjustment of non-taxable income and costs | 44 | 5 |
| Change in valuation of tax assets | -6 | 0 |
| Other taxes | 0 | 1 |
| 1,807 | 1,488 | |
| Effective tax rate | % | % |
| Tax on accounting profit/loss | 26.0 | 26.0 |
| Difference between Danish and foreign tax rates | -2.1 | -2.2 |
| Tax adjustment, previous years | 0.6 | -0.3 |
| Adjustment of non-taxable income and costs | 0.6 | 0.1 |
| Change in valuation of tax assets | -0.1 | 0.0 |
| Other taxes | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 25.0 | 23.6 |
Current tax
Tax in the income statement comprises current and deferred tax. Taxes are recognised through profit/loss, except for items recognised directly in equity or other comprehensive income, in which case the tax effect will also be recognised for those items.
Current tax is calculated based on the relevant tax rate for each country. Tryg Group is subject to an increased corporate tax rate relevant for financial institutions in Denmark at 26% compared to the statuary Danish corporate tax rate at 22%. The Difference between Danish and foreign tax rates relates to differences in corporate tax rates on income generated in non-Danish subsidiaries and branches. Other differences relates to adjustment of income in previous years and non-taxable or non-deductible income and costs.
Global Minimum Taxation - Pillar 2
Tryg Group is within the scope of the OECD Pillar 2 model rules. The application of the rules entails Tryg Group to pay additional top-up taxes in jurisdictions where the Globe effective tax rate is below 15%. Upon implementation of the Pillar 2 rules, transitional safe harbour rules have also been enacted. Tryg Group has performed a safe-harbour assessment and identified, that no additional top-up tax is to be paid for the financial year. Further, Tryg Group applies the exception in IAS 12 to recognize and disclose information about deferred tax assets and liabilities calculated under the Pillar 2 rules.
{159}------------------------------------------------
Notes
13 Tax (continued)
Tax is adjusted by any tax related to previous periods.
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Net current tax at 1 January | -844 | -192 |
| Exchange rate adjustments | -35 | 5 |
| Current tax for the year | -1,922 | -1,895 |
| Current tax on changes in equity | 52 | -68 |
| Adjustments of current tax in respect of previous years | 19 | -58 |
| Tax paid for the year | 2,155 | 1,365 |
| Net current tax at 31 December- | -576 | -844 |
| Current tax is recognised in the statement of financialposition as follows: | ||
| Assets, current tax | 60 | 43 |
| Liabilities, current tax | -636 | -887 |
| Net current tax at 31 December | -576 | -844 |
Tryg Total Tax Impact
Through various taxes, Tryg Group contributes to tax authorities in a number of jurisdictions. These contributions arise from our operations and business activities, and are collectively Tryg Group´s Total Tax Contribution. Tryg Group´s main business activities are in Denmark, Norway and Sweden which is also why the majority of our tax contributions are made to tax authorities etc. in these jurisdictions. We note that Tryg Group does not have business activities or operations in jurisdictions which are perceived to be tax havens, cf. EU´s List of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes.
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DKKm | Profit/lossbefore tax | Corporatetax paid | Other taxes | Profit/lossbefore tax | Corporatetax paid | Other taxes |
| Denmark | 3,066 | 876 | 2,310 | 2,658 | 707 | 2,324 |
| Norway | 1,310 | 190 | 1,256 | 954 | 249 | 1,378 |
| Sweden | 2,638 | 1,075 | 907 | 2,615 | 405 | 930 |
| Other countries | 198 | 12 | 47 | 76 | 3 | 45 |
| Total | 7,212 | 2,155 | 4,520 | 6,303 | 1,365 | 4,676 |
| Finland | 65 | 8 | 18 | 38 | -1 | 18 |
| Germany | 89 | 4 | 15 | 40 | 4 | 13 |
| Netherlands | 8 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Austria | 16 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 0 | 3 |
| Switzerland | -1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 1 |
| Belgium | 8 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 1 |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 0 | 1 | -5 | 0 | 2 |
| Ireland | 9 | 0 | 2 | -3 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 198 | 12 | 47 | 76 | 3 | 45 |
Activities in other countries than Denmark, Norway and Sweden consist of Credit & Surety business, Tryg Trade.
Current taxes represent the estimated taxes to be paid to authorities in respect of profit for the year and are paid in the year following the financial year. Corporate taxes paid are the taxes paid in the financial year to the tax authorities. Therefore, there is a difference in the accrual of the tax related to the profit/loss before tax for the year and the actual corporate income tax paid for the year.
{160}------------------------------------------------
13 Tax (continued)
Total Tax Contribution
Through Tryg Group´s business activities and operations the Group is subject to a number of taxes, which are either borne by Tryg Group or collected on behalf of tax authorities or similar authorities. Collectively the taxes borne and taxes collected represent the Total Tax contribution.
Tryg's Total Tax Contribution is split into the following five main categories: Corporate Taxes (refer to previous page), Employer taxes, Employee Taxes, Insurance premium taxes and VAT.
2025
| DKKm | Employertaxes | Employeetaxes | Insurancepremiumtaxes | VAT | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 477 | 1,047 | 719 | 68 | 2,310 |
| Norway | 162 | 231 | 837 | 27 | 1,256 |
| Sweden | 305 | 357 | 185 | 60 | 907 |
| Other countries | 11 | 19 | 18 | 0 | 47 |
| Total | 954 | 1,653 | 1,758 | 155 | 4,520 |
| 2024 | |||||
| Denmark | 424 | 1,151 | 684 | 64 | 2,324 |
| Norway | 170 | 234 | 941 | 33 | 1,378 |
| Sweden | 267 | 331 | 212 | 119 | 930 |
| Other countries | 9 | 18 | 17 | 0 | 45 |
| Total | 871 | 1,735 | 1,854 | 217 | 4,676 |
Taxes borne by Tryg Group are those imposed because of Tryg Group's business transactions, investments and profits. Taxes borne by Tryg Group generally comprise corporate income tax and VAT. Taxes collected relate mainly to Tryg Group's customers or employees and generally comprise insurance premium taxes and other contributions, stamp duties, guarantee fund taxes as well as payroll taxes.
{161}------------------------------------------------

14 Intangible assets
Accounting policy
Measurement of Goodwill, Trademarks and Customer relations
Goodwill, Trademarks and Customer relations was acquired in connection with the acquisition of businesses. Goodwill is allocated to the cash-generating units under which management manages the investment. The carrying amount is tested for impairment at least annually. Impairment testing involves estimates of future cash flows and is affected by several factors, including discount rates and other circumstances dependent on economic trends, such as customer behaviour and competition.
Goodwill
Goodwill is acquired in connection with acquisition of business. Goodwill is calculated as the difference between the cost of the undertaking and the fair value of acquired identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities at the time of acquisition. Goodwill is allocated to the cash-generating units under which management manages the investment and is recognised under intangible assets. Goodwill is not amortised but tested for impairment once a year or more frequently if indications of impairment exist.
Trademarks and customer relations
Trademarks and customer relations acquired in a business combination have been identified as intangible assets on acquisition.
Trademarks with an indefinite useful lifetime, hence are not amortised but instead tested for impairment at least once per year.
Customer relations are recognised at fair value at the time of acquisition and amortised on a straight-line basis over the expected useful lifetime of 5–15 years.
Software
Acquired software is measured at cost, including expenses to prepare the software application ready for use. The costs are amortised based on an expected useful lifetime of up to 8 years, according to the straight-line method.
Costs for group developed software that are directly attributable to the development of identifiable and individual software application, where there are reliably measurable expectations, that future earnings will exceed the costs in more than one year, are recognised as intangible assets.
Direct costs consist of salaries and fees for software development and other directly attributable costs. Costs related to the planning phase and maintenance are expensed when incurred.
After completion group developed software is amortised according to the straight-line method over the expected useful lifetime, though maximum 8 years.
Assets under construction
Group developed software are recognised as "Assets under construction" until the asset is ready to use, whereupon assets are reclassified as software and amortised in accordance with the amortisation period stated above.
Impairment test for intangible assets
Goodwill, trademarks with indefinite useful lifetimes and customer relations are tested annually for impairment, or more often if there are indications of impairment, and impairment testing is performed for each cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs. The present value is normally established using budgeted cash flows based on business plans. The business plans are based on past experience and expected market developments. Assets under construction are not amortised but tested at least once a year for impairment or if there are any indications for impairment. Software are tested for impairment at the balance sheet date or if there are indications that the future earnings will not exceed the carrying amount.
{162}------------------------------------------------
Notes
14 Intangible assets (continued)
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DKKm | Goodwill | Trademarksand customerrelations | Softwarea) | Assets underconstructiona) | Total | Goodwill | Trademarksand customerrelations | Softwarea) | Assets underconstructiona) | Total |
| Cost | ||||||||||
| Cost at 1 January | 20,137 | 12,015 | 3,175 | 715 | 36,041 | 20,693 | 12,332 | 2,861 | 559 | 36,445 |
| Exchange rate adjustments | 923 | 647 | 23 | 15 | 1,609 | -556 | -354 | -34 | -8 | -952 |
| Transferred from assets under construction tosoftware | 0 | 0 | 576 | -576 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 391 | -391 | 0 |
| Additions for the year | 0 | 0 | 89 | 397 | 487 | 0 | 37 | 264 | 555 | 856 |
| Disposals for the year | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -307 | 0 | -307 |
| Cost at 31 December | 21,061 | 12,662 | 3,863 | 551 | 38,137 | 20,137 | 12,015 | 3,175 | 715 | 36,041 |
| Amortisation and write-downs | ||||||||||
| Amortisation and write-downs at 1 January | -129 | -3,098 | -2,122 | 0 | -5,350 | -129 | -2,223 | -2,106 | 0 | -4,459 |
| Exchange rate adjustments | 0 | -147 | -8 | 0 | -155 | 0 | 54 | 21 | 0 | 76 |
| Amortisation for the year | 0 | -920 | -314 | 0 | -1,234 | 0 | -929 | -290 | 0 | -1,219 |
| Impairment losses and write-downs for the year | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -42 | 0 | -42 |
| Reversed amortisation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 295 | 0 | 295 |
| Amortisation and write-downs at 31 December | -129 | -4,166 | -2,443 | 0 | -6,739 | -129 | -3,098 | -2,122 | 0 | -5,350 |
| Carrying amount at 31 December | 20,932 | 8,496 | 1,419 | 551 | 31,398 | 20,008 | 8,917 | 1,053 | 715 | 30,692 |
a) Hereof proprietary software DKK 879m (DKK 586m at 31 December 2024). Asset under construction is only Group developed software.
{163}------------------------------------------------


14 Intangible assets (continued)
Impairment test
Goodwill
The value-in-use method is used for goodwill impairment tests.
The impairment test compares the recoverable amount and the carrying amount for each cash generating unit. The recoverable amount is represented by the present value of expected future cash flows (value-in-use). The value-in-use model applied is the dividend discount model to calculate the present value of expected future cash flows.
Primary assumptions for impairment test:
When assessing the cash flow management has based its estimates of insurance revenue on the insurance portfolio adjusted to reflect the expected effect of business decisions and market development from past experiences. Management have identified "Earned premium assumed" Compound annual growth rate (CAGR) and Combined ratio as the main drivers for cash flow. It is based on experience and no external data sources is used besides to determine the required return. The portfolio is indexed with the wage index. Gross claims are based on expected claims ratios, which corresponds to normalised large- and weather claims. Reinsurance is taken into account when looking at the overall insurance service result together with the expected expense ratio. Required returns are based on management's requirements for returns of the individual cash-generating units (CGU's) and are not expected to change significantly in the near future. The required return has been determined on the basis of the capital asset pricing model and comprises a risk-free interest rate aligned with the budget period, the market risk premium and the market beta covering the systematic market risk.
The Group has not acquired any portfolios or companies in 2025. At 31 December 2025, management performed impairment tests of the carrying amount of goodwill based on the allocation of the cost of goodwill to the CGU's: Private Denmark (Alka), Norway and Sweden respectively.
| DKKm | Material goodwill | Carryingamount, endof year |
|---|---|---|
| Alka | 4,242 | |
| Trygg-Hansa and Moderna | 15,153 | |
| Codan Norway | 1,029 |
Alka
In 2018, Tryg acquired Forsikrings-Aktieselskabet Alka. The insurance activities were incorporated into the Tryg Group's business structure from 8 November 2018. Comprises the sale of insurance products to customers under the 'Alka' brand.
The cash flows appearing from the latest prognosis approved by management for the next 8 quarters are used when calculating the value in use of Private Denmark. The cash flows in the latest prognosis period have been extrapolated for next five financial years after the prognosis periods. The reason for using a longer prognosis period than five years, is that the acquired business has a longer customer retention than five years, hence a 5-year forecast will not capture the economic reality nor the timing of the expected cash flows. The terminal period starts in year 9 and adjusted for expected growth rates determined on the basis of expectations for the general economic growth. The required return is based on an assessment of the risk profile of the tested business activities compared with the market's expectations for the Group.
The impairment test shows a calculated value in use of approximately DKK 27.4bn (DKK 33.2bn at 31 December 2024) relative to the value of the CGU of DKK 17.9bn (DKK 16.6bn at 31 December 2024) and does not indicate any impairment in 2025. Goodwill amounts to DKK 4.2bn (DKK 4.2bn at 31 December 2024).
According to the sensitivity information below a change in the required return rate will have the highest effect on the equity. An increase in the required return of approx. 2.0% will result in a write down of goodwill.
| 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|
| Key assumptions | ||
| - Earned premium assumed CAGR | 2 % | 3 % |
| - Earned premium assumed CAGR (terminal period) | 2 % | 2 % |
| - Required return before tax | 9 % | 8 % |
| - Expected level of combined ratio | 83 % | 82 % |
{164}------------------------------------------------
Notes
14 Intangible assets (continued)
| 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity information | ||
| Impact on the calculated present value from the following changes: | ||
| CAGR + 1.0 percentage point | +1.1bn | +1.4bn |
| CAGR - 1.0 percentage point | -1.0bn | -1.3bn |
| Required return +1.0 percentage point | -3.9bn | -5.2bn |
| Required return -1.0 percentage point | +5.5bn | +7.6bn |
| Combined ratio +1.0 percentage point | -1.5bn | -1.7bn |
| Combined ratio -1.0 percentage point | +1.5bn | +1.7bn |
The above changes have no impact on equity
Norway
In 2022, Tryg acquired the Norwegian branch Codan Norway. The insurance activities were incorporated into the Tryg Group's business structure from 1 April 2022 and distributed under the Tryg Brand.
In 2017, Tryg acquired Obos' insurance portfolio. The insurance activities were incorporated into the Tryg Group's business structure from 1 June 2017.
The cash flows appearing from the latest prognosis approved by management for the next 8 quarters are used when calculating the value in use of Norway. The cash flows in the latest prognosis period have been extrapolated for next five financial years after the prognosis periods. The reason for using a longer prognosis period than five years, is that the acquired business has a longer customer retention than five years, hence a 5-year forecast will not capture the economic reality nor the timing of the expected cash flows. The terminal period starts in year 9 and adjusted for expected growth rates determined on the basis of expectations for the general economic growth. The required return is based on an assessment of the risk profile of the tested business activities compared with the market's expectations for the Group.
The impairment test shows a calculated value in use of approximately DKK 9,0bn (DKK 8.9bn at 31 December 2024) relative to the value of the CGU of DKK 5.5bn (DKK 4.5bn at 31 December 2024) and does not indicate any impairment in 2025. Goodwill amounts to DKK 1.1bn (DKK 1.1bn at 31 December 2024).
According to the sensitivity information, a change in the required return rate will have the highest effect on the equity. An increase in the required return of approx. 3.7% will result in a write down of goodwill.
| 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|
| Key assumptions | ||
| - Earned premium assumed CAGR | 2 % | 3 % |
| - Earned premium assumed CAGR (terminal period) | 1 % | 1 % |
| - Required return before tax | 11 % | 11 % |
| - Expected level of combined ratio | 88 % | 88 % |
| Sensitivity information | ||
| Impact on the calculated present value from the following changes: | ||
| CAGR + 1.0 percentage point | +0.2bn | +0.2bn |
| CAGR - 1.0 percentage point | -0.2bn | -0.2bn |
| Required return +1.0 percentage point | -0.9bn | -1.1bn |
| Required return -1.0 percentage point | +1.2bn | +1.4bn |
| Combined ratio +1.0 percentage point | -0.8bn | -0.8bn |
| Combined ratio -1.0 percentage point | +0.8bn | +0.8bn |
The above changes have no impact on equity
Sweden
In 2022, Tryg acquired the Swedish branch Trygg-Hansa. The insurance activities were incorporated into the Tryg Group's business structure from 1 April 2022 and distributed under the Trygg-Hansa Brand.
In 2016, Tryg acquired Skandia's child and adult accident insurance portfolio. The insurance activities were incorporated into the Tryg Group's business structure from 1 September 2016.
{165}------------------------------------------------
14 Intangible assets (continued)
The Trygg-Hansa portfolio consists from 1 April 2022 of Trygg-Hansa, Moderna, Securator and Skandia, considered as one cash-generating unit. The reason behind the single cash-generating unit, is that they are all managed together as part of the Swedish private business and reported as part of the operating segment "Private".
Private Sweden comprises the sale of insurance products to private customers under the 'Trygg-Hansa' brand. Moreover, insurance is sold under the brands Atlantica, Bilsport & MC and Moderna Djurförsäkringar. Sales take place through its own sales force, call centres and online. Commercial Sweden comprises sales of insurance products to small and medium sized commercial customers under the Trygg Hansa brand.
The cash flows appearing from the latest prognosis approved by management for the next 8 quarters are used when calculating the value in use of "Sweden". The cash flows in the latest prognosis period have been extrapolated for next five financial years after the prognosis periods. The reason for using a longer prognosis period than five years, is that the acquired business has a longer customer retention than five years, hence a 5-year forecast will not capture the economic reality nor the timing of the expected cash flows. The terminal period starts in year 9 and adjusted for expected growth rates determined on the basis of expectations for the general economic growth. The required return is based on an assessment of the risk profile of the tested business activities compared with the market's expectations for the Group.
The impairment test shows a calculated value in use of approximately DKK 47.8bn (DKK 43.8bn at 31 December 2024) relative to the value of the CGU of DKK 28.3bn (DKK 26.9bn at 31 December 2024) and does not indicate any impairment in 2025. Goodwill amount to DKK 15.5bn (DKK 14.6bn at 31 December 2024).
According to the sensitivity information, a change in the required return rate will have the highest effect on the equity. An increase in the required return of approx. 2.0% will result in a write down of goodwill.
| 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|
| Key assumptions | ||
| - Earned premium assumed CAGR | 3 % | 3 % |
| - Earned premium assumed CAGR (terminal period) | 3 % | 3 % |
| - Required return before tax | 9 % | 8 % |
| - Expected level of combined ratio | 80 % | 81 % |
| Sensitivity information | ||
| Impact on the calculated present value from the following changes: | ||
| CAGR + 1.0 percentage point | +2.5bn | +2.1bn |
| CAGR - 1.0 percentage point | -2.3bn | -2.0bn |
| Required return +1.0 percentage point | -9.9bn | -8.3bn |
| Required return -1.0 percentage point | +16.5bn | +13.8bn |
| Combined ratio +1.0 percentage point | -2.5bn | -2.2bn |
| Combined ratio -1.0 percentage point | +2.5bn | +2.2bn |
The above changes have no impact on equity
{166}------------------------------------------------
14 Intangible assets (continued)
Trademarks and customer relations
As at 31 December 2025 management performed an assessment of the carrying amounts of customer relations as an integrated part of the impairment test of goodwill in Sweden, Norway and Alka portfolio.
Alka and Trygg-Hansa trademarks have indefinite useful lifetimes as the trademarks are one of the most well-known trademarks in their respective countries and comprise the sale of insurance products to customers under their brand.
Material trademarks and customer relations
| 2025(DKKm) | 2024(DKKm) | Amortisationperiod(years) | Remainingamortisation(years) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trygg-Hansa | ||||
| Trademark | 2,640 | 2,484 | n/a | n/a |
| Customer relations (Private) | 4,482 | 4,892 | 10 | 6 |
| Customer relations (Commercial) | 438 | 538 | 7 | 3 |
| Alka | ||||
| Trademark | 603 | 603 | n/a | n/a |
Software and assets under construction
As at 31 December 2025 management performed a test of the carrying amounts of software and assets under construction.
The impairment test compares the carrying amount with the estimated present value of future cash flows. The test did not indicate any write-downs (DKK 42m at 31 December 2024).
{167}------------------------------------------------

15 Property, plant and equipment
Accounting policy
Operating equipment
Fixtures and operating equipment are measured at cost less accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses. Cost encompasses the purchase price and costs directly attributable to the acquisition of the relevant assets until the time when such assets are ready to be brought into use.
Depreciation of operating equipment is calculated using the straight-line method over its estimated useful lifetime as follows:
- IT, 4 years
- Furniture, fittings and equipment, 5-10 years
Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the expected useful lifetime, however maximally the term of the lease.
Gains and losses on disposals and retired assets are determined by comparing proceeds with carrying amounts. Gains and losses are recognised in the income statement. When revalued assets are sold, the amounts included in the revaluation reserves are transferred to retained earnings.
Leasing
Right-of-use assets
At inception of a contract, Tryg assesses whether a contract is, or contains, a lease. It has the following prerequisites:
- The underlying asset is identifiable
- The group has the right to obtain substantially all the economic benefits from use of the asset throughout the period of use
- The group has the right to direct the use of the asset
Tryg recognises a right-of-use asset and a corresponding lease liability with respect to all lease agreements in which it is the lessee, excluding short-term leases (defined as leases with a lease term of 12 months or less) and leases of low value assets.
At inception or on reassessment of a contract that contains lease components, Tryg allocates the consideration in the contract to each lease component based on their relative stand-alone prices.
Right-of-use asset (ROU asset) and lease liability are recognised at the lease commencement date. The ROU asset is initially measured at cost, which comprises the initial amount of the lease liability adjusted for:
- lease payments made at or before the commencement date
- any initial direct cost incurred
- estimate of costs to dismantle and remove the underlying asset or to restore the underlying asset
- lease incentives received
- ROU assets are tested for impairment
Impairment test for operating equipment
Operating equipment is assessed at least once per year to ensure that the depreciation period is reflected in the expected useful lifetime. This also applies to the salvage value. Write-downs are performed if impairments has been demonstrated.
{168}------------------------------------------------
Notes
15 Property, plant and equipment (continued)
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DKKm2025 | Operatingequipment | Leases ROUequipmenta) | Leases ROUGroupoccupiedpropertyb) | Total | Operatingequipment | Leases ROUequipmenta) | Leases ROUGroupoccupiedpropertyb) | Total |
| Cost | ||||||||
| Cost at 1 January | 234 | 136 | 1,530 | 1,900 | 324 | 105 | 1,611 | 2,040 |
| Exchange rate adjustments | 3 | 0 | 33 | 36 | -3 | 0 | -33 | -36 |
| Additions for the year | 0 | 0 | 96 | 96 | 9 | 37 | 5 | 51 |
| Disposals for the year | -1 | 0 | -70 | -71 | -96 | -6 | -54 | -155 |
| Cost at 31 December | 236 | 137 | 1,590 | 1,962 | 234 | 136 | 1,530 | 1,900 |
| Accumulated depreciation and value adjustments | ||||||||
| Accumulated depreciation and value adjustments at 1 January | -70 | -109 | -771 | -950 | -141 | -98 | -676 | -915 |
| Exchange rate adjustments | -1 | 0 | -14 | -15 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 16 |
| Depreciation for the year | -26 | -15 | -134 | -175 | -26 | -15 | -156 | -197 |
| Reversed depreciation and value adjustments | 1 | 0 | 50 | 51 | 95 | 5 | 46 | 146 |
| Accumulated depreciation and value adjustments at 31 December | -96 | -124 | -869 | -1,089 | -70 | -109 | -771 | -950 |
a) Lease assets (ROU) equipment only consists of leases of vehicles with a lease term of three to four years. The monthly amounts are fixed and there is no option for purchase or extension. Short term leases are not recognised as right-of-use assets. b) Lease assets (ROU) Group occupied property consists of leases of office buildings. Contract terms are from 1 to 20 years and with yearly rent adjustments. Tryg has no lease contracts with variable lease payments based on sale or similar. Refer to note 27 for lease liabilities.
Carrying amount at 31 December 140 14 720 874 164 28 759 951
{169}------------------------------------------------

16 Investment property
Accounting policy
Properties held for renting yields that are not occupied by the Group are classified as investment properties.
Investment property is recognised at fair value. Fair value is based on transaction prices for similar properties, adjusted for any differences in the nature, location or maintenance condition of specific assets. If this information is not available, the Group uses alternative valuation methods such as discounted cash flow projections and recent prices in the market.
The fair value is calculated on the basis of market-specific rental income per property and typical operating expenses for the coming year. The resulting operating income is divided by the required return on the property in per cent, which is adjusted to reflect market interest rates and property characteristics, corresponding to the present value of a perpetual annuity. The value is subsequently adjusted with the capitalised value of the return on prepayments and deposits and adjustments for specific property issues such as vacant premises or special tenant terms and conditions. Changes in fair values are recorded in the income statement.
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Fair value at 1 January | 429 | 498 |
| Disposals for the year | -416 | -38 |
| Value adjustment for the yeara) | -13 | -31 |
| Total | 0 | 429 |
- a) Value adjustment recognised in the income statement for investment property held at the statement of financial position date amounts DKK 0m (DKK -28m in 2024)
- Total rental income amounts to DKK 21m (DKK 31m in 2024)
- Total expenses amounts to DKK 9 (DKK 7m in 2024).
External experts were involved in valuing the majority of the investment properties. Please refer to note 18 for a description of fair value measurement of investment properties.
| Return percentages, weighted average (%) | 2024 |
|---|---|
| Office property | 7.1 |
| Residential property | 5.7 |
| Total | 6.2 |
{170}------------------------------------------------

17 Equity investment in associates
Accounting policy
Associates are enterprises in which the Group has significant influence but not control, generally in the form of an ownership interest of between 20% and 50% of the voting rights. Equity investments in associates are measured using the equity method and the carrying amount of the investment represents the Group's proportionate share of the enterprises' net assets. Significant transaction costs are recognised as part of the acquisition price.
Profit after tax from equity investments in associates is included as a separate line in the income statement. Income is made up after elimination of unrealised intra-group profits and losses.
Associates with a negative net asset value are measured at zero value. If the Group has a legal or constructive obligation to cover the associate's negative balance, such obligation is recognised under liabilities.
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | ||
| Cost at 1 January | 75 | 56 |
| Additions for the year | 0 | 52 |
| Disposals for the year | -1 | -33 |
| Cost at 31 December | 74 | 75 |
| Revaluations at net asset value | ||
| -Revaluation at 1 January | -37 | -2 |
| Reversed on sale | 0 | 11 |
| Profit/loss for the year | -4 | -46 |
| Revaluations at 31 December | -41 | -37 |
| Carrying amount at 31 December | 33 | 38 |
18 Financial assets
Accounting policy
Fair value of financial assets and liabilities
Measurements of financial assets and liabilities for which prices are quoted in an active market or which are based on generally accepted models with observable market data are not subject to material estimates. For securities that are not listed on a stock exchange, or for which no stock exchange price is quoted that reflects the fair value of the instrument, the fair value is determined using a current OTC price of a similar financial instrument or using a model calculation. The valuation models include the discounting of the instrument cash flow using an appropriate market interest rate with due consideration for credit and liquidity premiums.
Recognition and classification of financial instruments
Financial instruments are classified as follows based on the Group's business models:
- The asset is held to collect cash flows from payments of principal and interest (hold to collect business model). Measured at amortised cost after initial recognition.
- The asset is held to collect cash flows from payments of principal and interest and selling the asset (hold to collect and sell business model). Measured at fair value with changes recognised through other comprehensive income with reclassification to the income statement on realisation of the assets.
- Other financial assets are measured at fair value through profit or loss. These include assets managed on a fair value basis, held in the trading book or assets, where contractual cash flows do not solely comprise interest and principal of the receivable. It is also still possible to measure financial assets at fair value with value adjustment through profit or loss, when such measurement significantly reduces or eliminates an accounting mismatch that would otherwise have occurred on measurement of assets and liabilities or recognition of losses and gains on different bases.
- Generally, financial liabilities are measured at amortised cost after initial recognition.
For the first two categories, financial assets must be held within a business model whose objective is to hold assets to collect contractual cash flows representing payments of principal and interest etc combined with limited sales activity.
{171}------------------------------------------------

Notes
18 Financial assets (continued)
If this is not the objective of the business model, the financial assets will be placed in a category, which is subject to fair value adjustment through profit or loss.
Financial assets, which, if measured at amortised cost fair value with changes recognised through other comprehensive income would result in a accounting mismatch, are also recognised in this category.
The Group's financial assets and business models have been reviewed to ensure correct classification thereof. The review included an assessment of whether collecting cash flows is a significant element, including whether the cash flows represent solely payments of principal and interest.
Tryg does not have a business model that implies recognising fair value adjustments in other comprehensive income. Thus, bank loans and deposits are essentially still measured at amortised cost.
Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value through profit or loss
A financial asset is attributable to this category
- if the asset is not held within a business model whose objective is to hold assets to collect cash flows representing payments of principal and interest and which has limited sales activity
- if measurement of the asset at amortised cost or at fair value through other comprehensive income would result in an accounting mismatch.
Equity and bond portfolios are generally measured at fair value through profit or loss. Bonds which are held to match the insurance contracts liabilities are designated to be measured at fair value through profit or loss.
The business model behind the bond portfolio is not intrinsically based on collecting cash flows from payments of principal and interest but is based on, for example, short-term trading activity and investments focused on cost minimisation, where contractual cash flows do not constitute a central element but follow solely from the investment.
Equity instruments are not based on cash flows which comprise payments of principal and interest. Therefore, these instruments are measured at fair value with value adjustment through profit or loss.
Derivative financial instruments (derivatives), which are assets or liabilities, are measured at fair value through profit or loss, unless they are classified as hedging instruments.
Realised and unrealised profits and losses that may arise because of changes in the fair value for the category financial assets at fair value are recognised in the income statement in the period in which they arise.
Financial assets are derecognised when the rights to receive cash flows from the financial assets have expired, or if they have been transferred, and the Group has also transferred substantially all risks and rewards of ownership. Financial assets are recognised and derecognised on a trade date basis, the date on which the Group commits to purchase or sell the asset.
The fair values of quoted securities are based on stock exchange prices at the statement of financial position date. For securities that are not listed on a stock exchange, or for which no stock exchange price is quoted that reflects the fair value of the instrument, the fair value is determined using valuation techniques. These include the use of similar recent arm's length transactions, reference to other similar instruments or discounted cash flow analysis.
{172}------------------------------------------------
- Notes
18 Financial assets (continued)
Financial assets and liabilities by measurement categories
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Financial assets | ||
| Financial assets held for trading | 20,645 | 21,111 |
| Financial assets designated at fair valuea) | 43,984 | 44,235 |
| Derivative financial instruments at fair value used for hedge accounting | ||
| with value adjustment in other comprehensive income | 18 | 7 |
| Financial assets measured at amortised costb) | 3,628 | 2,587 |
| Total financial assets | 68,276 | 67,940 |
| Financial liabilities | ||
| Derivative financial instruments at fair value with value adjustments inincome statement | 1,327 | 1,018 |
| Derivative financial instruments at fair value with value adjustments inother comprehensive income | 34 | 30 |
| Financial liabilities at amortised cost | 12,531 | 14,534 |
| Total financial liabilities | 13,892 | 15,583 |
- a) Financial assets designated at fair value comprise bonds in the match portfolio
- b) Financial assets at amortised cost only deviate to a minor extent from fair value
Please refer to note 21 for valuation of subordinated loan capital at fair value. Other financial liabilities measured at amortised cost only deviate to a minor extent from fair value.
The Fair value hierarchy
Quoted market prices (level 1) consists of financial instruments that are quoted and traded in a principal and active market (markets generally accessible and with substantial volume and trade frequency).
Valuation based on observable input (level 2) consists of financial instruments that are valued substantially on the basis of observable input other than quoted prices for the instrument itself. If a financial instrument is quoted in a market that is not active, Tryg bases its measurement on the most recent transaction price adjusted for subsequent
changes to market conditions, for instance, by including transactions in similar financial instruments that are assumed to be motivated by normal business considerations.
For a number of financial assets and liabilities, no market exists. In such cases, Tryg uses recent transactions in similar instruments and discounted cash flows or other generally accepted estimation and valuation techniques based on market conditions at the statement of the financial position date to calculate an estimated value. This category covers instruments such as derivatives valued on the basis of observable yield curves and exchange rates and illiquid mortgage bonds valued by reference to the value of similar liquid bonds. Equity investments includes private equity with underlying real estate.
Tryg has assessed whether quoted prices does represent fair value at the measurement date. Thus quoted prices derived from a brokered market are considered Level 2 input.
Valuation based on significant non-observable input (level 3) consists of certain financial instruments based substantially on non-observable input. Such instruments includes unlisted property funds and a limited amount of unlisted shares. The fair value of Investment property is also based on non-observable input. Please refer to note 16 Investment property and accounting policies section Investment property.
In 2024 property funds were priced by an external outsourcing party. In 2025 the valuation of the funds is done by Tryg Forsikring based on NAV. Increase in hierarchy 3 investments is due to this change.
If, at the statement of the financial position date, a financial instrument's classification differs from its classification at the beginning of the year the changes are considered to have taken place at the statement of the financial position date. Developments in the financial markets can result in reclassifications between the categories. Some bonds have become illiquid and have therefore been moved from Quoted prices to the Observable input category, while other bonds have become liquid and have been moved from Observable input to the Quoted prices category.
{173}------------------------------------------------
18 Financial assets (continued)
Fair value hierarchy for financial instruments and investment property measured at fair value in the statement of financial position.
| Non | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quoted | Observable | observable | |||
| DKKm | 2025 | prices | input | input | Total |
| Investment property | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Equity investments | 0 | 0 | 2,401 | 2,401 | |
| Unit trust units | 1,189 | 0 | 0 | 1,189 | |
| Bonds | 30,576 | 29,905 | 0 | 60,481 | |
| Derivative financial instruments, assets | 0 | 577 | 0 | 577 | |
| Derivative financial instruments, debt | 0 | -1,361 | 0 | -1,361 | |
| 31,765 | 29,121 | 2,401 | 63,287 | ||
| 2024 | |||||
| Investment property | 0 | 0 | 429 | 429 | |
| Equity investments | 102 | 3,676 | 58 | 3,836 | |
| Unit trust units | 1,138 | 0 | 30 | 1,168 | |
| Bonds | 30,066 | 29,621 | 0 | 59,687 | |
| Derivative financial instruments, assets | 0 | 661 | 0 | 661 | |
| Derivative financial instruments, debt | 0 | -1,048 | 0 | -1,048 | |
| 31,306 | 32,910 | 517 | 64,733 |
Bonds measured on the basis of observable inputs consist of Norwegian and Swedish bonds issued by banks and to some extent Danish semi-liquid bonds, where no quoted prices based on actual trades are available. External experts were involved in the valuation of the majority of the investment properties.
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Financial instruments transferred from "Quoted prices" to "Observableinput" | 1,019 | 1,287 | |
| Financial instruments transferred from "Observable input" to "Quotedprices" | 0 | 611 |
Transfers between the categories quoted prices and observable input mainly result from bonds that are reclassified either due to traded volume or the number of days between last transaction and the time of determination.
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Financial instruments measured at fair value in the statement of financialposition on the basis of non-observable input: | ||
| Carrying amount at 1 January | 517 | 1,001 |
| Exchange rate adjustments | 0 | 3 |
| Gains/losses in the income statement | -321 | -21 |
| Purchases | 411 | 1 |
| Sales | -1,191 | -467 |
| Transfers to/from Level 3 'non-observable input' | 2,985 | 0 |
| Carrying amount at 31 December | 2,401 | 517 |
| Gains/losses in the income statement for assets held at the statement offinancial position date recognised in value adjustments | -193 | -14 |
{174}------------------------------------------------
Notes
18 Financial assets (continued)
Accounting policy
Derivative financial instruments and hedge accounting
The Group's activities expose it to financial risks, including changes in foreign exchange rates, interest rates and inflation. Forward exchange contracts and currency swaps are used for currency hedging of portfolios of bonds, hedging of foreign entities and insurance statement of financial position items. Interest rate derivatives in the form of futures, forward contracts and swaps are used to manage cash flows and interest rate risks related to the portfolio of bonds and insurance provisions.
Derivative financial instruments are reported from the trading date and are measured in the statement of financial position at fair value. Positive fair values of derivatives are recognised as derivative financial instruments under assets. Negative fair values of derivatives are recognised under derivative financial instruments under liabilities. Positive and negative values are only offset when the company is entitled or intends to make net settlement of more financial instruments.
Discounting based on market interest rates is applied in the case of derivative financial instruments involving an expected future cash flow. Recognition of the resulting gain or loss depends on whether the derivative is designated as a hedging instrument and, if so, the nature of the item being hedged. The Group designates certain derivatives as hedges of investments in foreign entities. Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated and qualify as net investment hedges in foreign entities and which provide effective currency hedging of the net investment are recognised in other comprehensive income. The tangible net asset value of the foreign entities estimated at the beginning of the financial year is hedged 90-100% by entering into short-term forward exchange contracts according to the requirements of hedge accounting. Changes in the fair value relating to the ineffective portion are recognised in the income statement. Gains and losses accumulated in equity are included in the income statement on disposal of the foreign entity.
Derivative financial instruments
Derivatives at fair value:
| Fair valuein | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positivemarket | Negativemarket | statementof financial | |||
| DKKm | 2025 | Nominal | value | value | position |
| Interest derivatives | 87,385 | 692 | 1,408 | -716 | |
| Exchange rate derivativesa) | 9,644 | 118 | 104 | 14 | |
| Inflation derivatives | 22,542 | 281 | 358 | -77 | |
| Gross amount before offsetting | 119,571 | 1,091 | 1,870 | -779 | |
| Due after less than 1 year | 33,214 | 194 | 152 | 42 | |
| Due within 1 to 5 years | 46,727 | 315 | 604 | -289 | |
| Due after more than 5 years | 39,630 | 582 | 1,114 | -532 | |
| 2024 | |||||
| Interest derivatives | 100,144 | 794 | 1,336 | -542 | |
| Exchange rate derivativesa) | 8,041 | 65 | 121 | -56 | |
| Inflation derivatives | 17,422 | 462 | 251 | 212 | |
| Gross amount before offsetting | 125,607 | 1,321 | 1,708 | -387 | |
| Due after less than 1 year | 49,464 | 182 | 161 | 21 | |
| Due within 1 to 5 years | 37,119 | 274 | 441 | -167 | |
| Due after more than 5 years | 39,024 | 865 | 1,106 | -240 |
a) hereof used for hedging of foreign entities nominal value of DKK4.6bn (DKK 6.6bn at 31 December 2024)
Derivatives are used continuously as part of the cash and risk management carried out by Tryg and its portfolio managers.
Derivate financial instruments used in connection with hedging of foreign entities for accounting purposes.
{175}------------------------------------------------
18 Financial assets (continued)
Hedging of net investments in foreign entities
| position | 24,405 | 21,573 |
|---|---|---|
| Portion of net investment in foreign entities not hedged, structural FX | ||
| foreign entities | 4,559 | 6,550 |
| Exchange rate contracts designated as a hedge of net investments in | ||
| Net investment in foreign entities | 28,965 | 28,123 |
| 2025 | 2024 | |
Gains and losses on hedges charged to other comprehensive income:
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DKKm | Gains | Losses | Net | Gain | Losses | Net |
| Gains and losses at 1 January | 6,589 | 5,483 | 1,106 | 5,877 | 5,033 | 844 |
| Value adjustments for the year | 383 | 572 | -189 | 712 | 451 | 262 |
| Gains and losses at 31 | ||||||
| December | 6,972 | 6,056 | 916 | 6,589 | 5,483 | 1,106 |
Value adjustments of foreign entities recognised in other comprehensive income in the amount of:
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Value adjustments at 1 January | -3,474 | -2,441 |
| Value adjustments for the year | 1,545 | -1,030 |
| Hedge ineffectiveness recognised in the income statement | 0 | -3 |
| Value adjustment at 31 December | -1,930 | -3,474 |
Derivative financial instruments used in connection with hedging of foreign entities for accounting purposes consists of FX-forward contracts with a duration of 3 months and have a nominal value of SEK 4.5bn at an exchange rate of 68.30 and NOK 2.3bn at an exchange rate of 64.17.
The hedge strategy is structured to mitigate fluctuations in Tryg's Own funds.
19 Assets from reinsurance contracts
Accounting policy
Portfolios of reinsurance contracts that are assets and those that are liabilities, are presented separately in the statement of financial position. Any assets or liabilities recognised for cash flows arising before the recognition of the related group of contracts are included in the carrying amount of the related portfolios of contracts.
Expected cash flows from reinsurers are measured consistently with the amounts associated with the reinsured insurance contracts and in accordance with the terms of each reinsurance contract.
Changes due to unwinding and changes due to changes in the yield curve or foreign exchange rates are recognised as 'Net finance income/expense from reinsurance contracts'.
The effect of changes in expected cash flows that result from changes in the risk of nonperformance by the issuer of a reinsurance contract held is recognised separately.
Reinsurance contracts
Groups of reinsurance contracts are established such that each group comprises a single contract.
A group of reinsurance contracts is recognised on the following date:
- Reinsurance contracts held that provide proportionate coverage is recognised at the date on which any underlying insurance contract is initially recognised. This applies to the Group's quota share reinsurance contracts.
- Other reinsurance contracts held is recognised at the beginning of the coverage period of the group of reinsurance contracts.
- Tryg recognises an onerous group of underlying insurance contracts if Tryg entered into the related reinsurance contract held at or before that date.
- Reinsurance contracts acquired is recognised at the date of acquisition.
{176}------------------------------------------------
19 Assets from reinsurance contracts (continued)
Measurement, reinsurance contracts
The Group applies the same accounting policies to measure a group of reinsurance contracts, adapted where necessary to reflect features that differ from those of insurance contracts.
If a loss-recovery component is created for a group of reinsurance contracts measured under the PAA, then Tryg adjusts the carrying amount of the asset for remaining coverage. Risk adjustment for non-financial risk for reinsurance contracts are modelled using similar statistical models as for direct insurance contract so that it represents the amount of risk being transferred by the holder of the group of reinsurance contracts to the issuer of those contracts.
Asset for incurred claims Asset for incurred claims
DKKm Assets for remaining coveragec) Present value of future cash flow Risk adjustment for non-financial risk Total Assets for remaining coveragec) Present value of future cash flow Risk adjustment for non-financial risk Total Balance at 31 December 2024 87 2,181 706 2,974 Transfer between LIC and AIC -488 -488 Balance at 1 January 87 2,181 218 2,486 36 2,184 840 3,060 Reinsurance expenses 1,230 0 0 1,230 1,349 0 0 1,349 Claims recovered 0 -314 30 -284 0 -2,088 680 -1,409 Run-off, adjustments of previous years 0 -169 -2 -171 0 1,634 -826 808 Net income/expenses from reinsurance contracts held 1,230 -484 28 775 1,349 -454 -147 748 Net finance income/expenses from reinsurance contracts held 1 -20 14 -5 -3 -134 14 -124 Total amounts recognised in income statement 1,231 -504 42 770 1,346 -588 -133 624 Cash flows
paida) -1,188 0 0 -1,188 -1,296 0 0 -1,296 Recoveries from reinsuranceb) 0 126 0 126 0 586 0 586 Total Cash Flows -1,188 126 0 -1,062 -1,296 586 0 -710 Closing balance assets from reinsurance contracts 130 1,804 260 2,194 87 2,181 706 2,974 Balance at 31 December 130 1,804 260 2,194 87 2,181 706 2,974
2025 2024
a) Premiums paid include amounts from change in balance sheet and exchange rate adjustments
Premiums paid net of ceding commissions and other directly attributable expenses
- b) Recoveries from reinsurance include change in balance sheet and exchange rate adjustments
- c) No recognised loss components in 2024 or 2025
{177}------------------------------------------------
20 Equity
| Shares outstanding | Own shares | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of shares (1,000) | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 |
| Number of shares at 1 January | 613,165 | 617,455 | 3,227 | 17,380 |
| Acquired own shares during the year | -12,152 | -4,732 | 12,152 | 4,732 |
| Cancellation in connection with share buyback | 0 | 0 | -5,018 | -18,443 |
| Exercise of incentive programme | 1,007 | 441 | -1,007 | -441 |
| Number of shares at 31 December | 602,020 | 613,165 | 9,355 | 3,227 |
| Number of shares issued at 31 December (%) | 98.47 | 99.48 | 1.53 | 0.52 |
| Nominal value at 31 December (DKKm) | 3,010 | 3,066 | 47 | 16 |
All shares have equal rights.
Pursuant to the authorisation granted by the shareholders, Tryg may acquire up to a total nominal value DKK 300m of the share capital in the period up until 31 December 2026. Own shares are acquired for share buyback and for use in the Group's incentive programme.
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Solvency II - Own funds | ||
| Total equity according to statement of financial position | 39,620 | 38,864 |
| Proposed dividend, not paid | -1,253 | -1,202 |
| Outstanding Share buyback | -1,000 | -1,676 |
| Intangible assets | -31,398 | -30,692 |
| Profit margin, solvency purpose | 3,600 | 3,600 |
| Taxes related to Intangibles assets and Profit margin, solvency purposes | 1,421 | 1,459 |
| Subordinated loan capital | 2,582 | 2,886 |
| Solvency II - Own funds | 13,570 | 13,239 |
{178}------------------------------------------------
20 Equity (continued)
Subordinated loan capital recognised as equity for accounting purposes
| Bond loan SEK 900ma)Bond loan NOK 600ma) | Bond loan SEK 700ma) | Bond loan NOK 300ma) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DKKm | 20252024 | 20252024 | 20252024 | 20252024 |
| Carrying amount of the loan recognised in statement of financial position | 596596 | 391391 | 477 | 01920 |
| Loan terms: | ||||
| Lender | Listed bondsListed bonds | Listed bonds | Listed bonds | |
| Principal | SEK 900m | NOK 600m | SEK 700m | NOK 300m |
| Issue price | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Issue date | March 2023 | March 2023 | November 2025 | November 2025 |
| Maturity year | Perpetual | Perpetual | Perpetual | Perpetual |
| Loan may be called by borrower as from | 2028 | 2028 | 2031 | 2031 |
| Repayment profile | Interest-only | Interest-only | Interest-only | Interest-only |
| Interest structure | 3.50% above STIBOR 3m | 3.45% above NIBOR 3m | 2.10% above STIBOR 3m | 2.10% above NIBOR 3m |
a) Coupon on the Notes is due and payable only at the sole and absolute discretion of Tryg. Accordingly, Tryg may at any time in its sole and absolute discretion elect to cancel any interest payment or a part thereof which would otherwise be payable on any interest payment date. Will become payable only in the event of Tryg Forsikring A/S's bankruptcy.
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Carrying amount of the loan recognised in statement of financial position | ||
| Bond loan SEK 900m | 596 | 596 |
| Bond loan NOK 600m | 391 | 391 |
| Bond loan SEK 700m | 477 | 0 |
| Bond loan NOK 300m | 192 | 0 |
| Total carrying amount of the loan recognised in statement of financial | ||
| position | 1,655 | 987 |
{179}------------------------------------------------
21 Subordinated loan capital
Accounting policy
Subordinated loan capital
Subordinated debt consists of financial liabilities in the form of subordinated loan capital and Additional Tier 1 capital which, in case of voluntary or compulsory liquidation, will not be repaid until the claims of ordinary creditors have been met. Subordinated loan capital is recognised initially at fair value, net of transaction costs incurred. Subordinated loan capital is subsequently stated at amortised cost; any difference between the proceeds (net of transaction costs) and the redemption value is recognised in the income statement over the borrowing period using the effective interest method.
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Amortised cost value of loan recognised in statement of financial position | ||
| Bond loan NOK 600m | 378 | 0 |
| Bond loan NOK 1,400ma) | 0 | 881 |
| Bond loan NOK 850m | 536 | 534 |
| Bond loan SEK 1,300m | 896 | 843 |
| Bond loan SEK 800m | 551 | 0 |
| Bond loan SEK 1,000mb) | 214 | 647 |
| Total amortised cost value of the loan recognised in statement of financial | ||
| position | 2,575 | 2,906 |
a) Cancelled in 2025
b) Tryg Forsikring A/S has purchased SEK 687m of the outstanding 1,000m in 2025
{180}------------------------------------------------
Notes
21 Subordinated loan capital (continued)
| Bond loan NOK 600m | Bond loan NOK 1,400ma)Bond loan SEK 1,000mb) | Bond loan NOK 850m | Bond loan SEK 1,300m | Bond loan SEK 800m | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 |
| Amortised cost value of the loan recognised instatement of financial position | 378 | 0 | 0 | 881 | 214 | 647 | 536 | 534 | 896 | 843 | 551 | 0 |
| The fair value of the loan at the statement of financialposition date | 380 | 387 | 0 | 894 | 217 | 655 | 541 | 533 | 900 | 826 | 552 | 0 |
| The fair value of the loan at the statement of financialposition date is based on a price of | 100 | 102 | 0 | 101 | 100 | 101 | 101 | 100 | 100 | 98 | 100 | 0 |
| Total capital losses and costs at the statement of thefinancial position date | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| Interest expenses for the year | 5 | 32 | 57 | 67 | 30 | 40 | 31 | 33 | 30 | 41 | 4 | 0 |
| Effective interest rate | 5.9 % | 8.2 % | 7.28 % | 8.42 % | 4.35 % | 5.79 % | 6.26 % | 6.72 % | 3.85 % | 5.39 % | 3.75 % | — % |
| Loan terms: | ||||||||||||
| Lender | Listed bonds | Listed bonds | Listed bonds | Listed bonds | Listed bonds | Listed bonds | ||||||
| Principal | NOK 600m | NOK 1,400m | SEK 1,000m | NOK 850m | SEK 1,300m | SEK 800m | ||||||
| Issue price | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||||||
| Issue date | October 2025 | November 2015 | February 2021 | May 2021 | May 2021 | October 2025 | ||||||
| Maturity year | 2056 | 2045 | Perpetual | 2051 | 2051 | 2056 | ||||||
| Loan may be called by borrower as from | 2030 | 2025 | 2026 | 2027 | 2026 | 2030 | ||||||
| Repayment profile | Interest-only | Interest-only | Interest-only | Interest-only | Interest-only | Interest-only |
a) Cancelled in 2025
Interest structure
1.15% above NIBOR 3m
2.15% above NIBOR 3m
(until 2035)
(from 2035)
The share of subordinated loan capital included in own funds totals DKK 2,582m (DKK 2,886m at 31 December 2024). The loans are initially recognised at fair value on the date on which a loan is entered and subsequently measured at amortised cost. The fair value of the loans are based on quoted prices. Given the low frequency of trades the prices are considered Level 2 input.
(until 2025) 2.4% above STIBOR 3m
1.25% above NIBOR 3m
2.25% above NIBOR 3m
1.15% above STIBOR 3m
2.15% above STIBOR 3m
(until 2031)
(from 2031)
(until 2031)
(from 2031)
2.75% above NIBOR 3m
3.75% above NIBOR 3m
(from 2025)
The loans are issued by Tryg Forsikring A/S. The creditors have no option to call the loans before maturity or otherwise terminate the loan agreements. Tryg Forsikring A/S have the option to pay the subordinated loan at nominal maturity date with an option for early redemption. The loans are automatically accelerated upon the liquidation or bankruptcy of Tryg Forsikring A/S. Prices used for determination of fair value in respect of the loans are based on actual traded prices from Bloomberg.
1.15% above STIBOR 3m
2.15% above STIBOR 3m
(until 2035)
(from 2035)
b) Tryg Forsikring A/S has purchased SEK 687m of the outstanding SEK 1,000m in 2025
{181}------------------------------------------------
Notes
22 Insurance contract liabilities
Aggregation and recognition
Insurance contracts are aggregated into groups for measurement purposes. Groups of insurance contracts are determined by identifying portfolios of insurance contracts, each comprising contracts subject to similar risks and managed together, and dividing each portfolio into annual cohorts (i.e. by year of issue) and each annual cohort into three groups based on the profitability of contracts:
- any contracts that are onerous on initial recognition;
- any contracts that, on initial recognition, have no significant possibility of becoming onerous subsequently; and
- any remaining contracts in the annual cohort.
An insurance contract issued is recognised from the earliest of:
- the beginning of its coverage period;
- when the first payment from the policyholder becomes due or, if there is no contractual due date, when it is received from the policyholder; and
- when facts and circumstances indicate that the contract is onerous.
An insurance contract acquired in a transfer of contracts or a business combination is recognised on the date of acquisition.
Contract boundary
Contract boundary define the cash flows within the boundary of each insurance contract. Cash flows are within the contract boundary if they arise from substantive rights and obligations that exist during the reporting period in which Tryg can compel the policyholder to pay premiums or has a substantive obligation to provide services (including insurance coverage and any investment services).
A substantive obligation to provide services ends when:
- Tryg has the practical ability to reassess the risks of the particular policyholder and can set a price or level of benefits that fully reflects those reassessed risks; or
- Tryg has the practical ability to reassess the risks of the portfolio that contains the contract and can set a price or level of benefits that fully reflects the risks of that portfolio, and the pricing of the premiums up to the reassessment date does not take into account risks that relate to periods after the reassessment date.
The reassessment of risks considers only risks transferred from policyholders to Tryg, which may include both insurance and financial risks, but exclude lapse and expense risks.
Tryg issues non-life insurance contracts with a short period of insurance covers. Tryg apply the premium allocation model to all insurance contracts issued.
Cash flows are within the contract boundary of a reinsurance contract held if they arise from substantive rights and obligations that exist during the reporting period in which Tryg is compelled to pay amounts to the reinsurer or has a substantive right to receive services from the reinsurer.
A substantive right to receive services from the reinsurer ends when the reinsurer:
- has the practical ability to reassess the risks transferred to it and can set a price or level of benefits that fully reflects those reassessed risks; or
- has a substantive right to terminate the coverage.
The contract boundary is reassessed at each reporting date to include the effect of changes in circumstances.
Loss component
Tryg assumes that no contracts are onerous at initial recognition unless facts and circumstances indicate otherwise.
Tryg considers facts and circumstances to identify whether a group of contracts are onerous based on:
- Pricing information
- Results of similar contracts it has recognised
- Environmental factors, e.g., a change in market experience or regulations
Where this is not the case, and if at any time during the coverage period, the facts and circumstances mentioned indicate that a group of insurance contracts is onerous, Tryg establishes a loss component as the excess of the fulfilment cash flows that relate to the
{182}------------------------------------------------
Notes
22 Insurance contract liabilities (continued)
remaining coverage of the group over the carrying amount of the liability for remaining coverage of the group. Accordingly, by the end of the coverage period of the group of contracts the loss component will be nil.
Loss-recovery components
When Tryg recognises a loss on initial recognition of an onerous group of underlying insurance contracts, or when further onerous underlying insurance contracts are added to a group, Tryg establishes a loss-recovery component of the asset for remaining coverage for a group of reinsurance contracts held depicting the expected recovery of the losses if relevant.
The loss-recovery component is subsequently reduced to zero in line with reductions in the onerous group of underlying insurance contracts in order to reflect that the lossrecovery component shall not exceed the portion of the carrying amount of the loss component of the onerous group of underlying insurance contracts that the entity expects to recover from the group of reinsurance contracts held.
Measurement, insurance contracts
Tryg uses the premium allocation approach to simplify the measurement of groups of insurance contracts.
On initial recognition of each group of contracts, the carrying amount of the liability for remaining coverage is measured at the premiums received on initial recognition. Tryg has chosen to expense insurance acquisition cash flows when they are incurred.
The coverage period is defined as the period when an insured event can occur.
Subsequently, the carrying amount of the liability for remaining coverage is increased by any premiums received and decreased by the amount recognised as insurance revenue for services provided. Services is usually provided based on passage of time.
Tryg expects that the time between providing each part of the services and the related premium due date is no more than a year. Accordingly, Tryg has chosen not to adjust the liability for remaining coverage to reflect the time value of money and the effect of financial risk.
If at any time during the coverage period, facts and circumstances indicate that a group of contracts is onerous, then Tryg recognises a loss in profit or loss and increases the liability for remaining coverage to the extent that the current estimates of the fulfilment cash flows that relate to remaining coverage exceed the carrying amount of the liability for remaining coverage. The fulfilment cash flows are discounted at current rates.
Claims and claims handling costs including expected claims handling costs are expensed in the income statement as incurred based on the estimated future cash flows to policyholders or third parties to fulfil the obligations toward policyholders. Claims include direct and indirect claims handling costs that arise from events that have occurred up to the Statement of Financial Position date even if they have not yet been reported to Tryg.
Liability for Incurred claims is measured as the total of the expected fulfilment cash flows, which comprise estimates of future cash flows, adjusted to reflect the time value of money and the associated financial risks, and a risk adjustment for non-financial risk. The fulfilment cash flows of a group of insurance contracts do not reflect Tryg's nonperformance risk.
The risk adjustment for non-financial risk for the liability for incurred claims is determined separately from the other estimates and is the compensation required for bearing uncertainty about the amount and timing of the cash flows that arises from non-financial risk.
The risk adjustment is based on statistical methods (cost of capital) and the disclose of the confidence level corresponding to the results of that technique is shown below.
Tryg disaggregates the change in the risk adjustment for non-financial risk between the insurance service result and the effect of discounting in insurance finance income or expenses.
{183}------------------------------------------------
Notes
22 Insurance contract liabilities (continued)
Tryg recognises the liability for incurred claims of a group of insurance contracts at the amount of the fulfilment cash flows relating to incurred claims. The future fulfilment cash flows are discounted (at current rates).
Fulfilment cash flows are estimated using the assessments of individual cases reported to Tryg and statistical analyses of claims incurred but not reported and the expected ultimate cost of more complex claims that may be affected by external factors (such as court decisions). The provisions include claims handling costs.
Liability for incurred claims is discounted to reflect the time value of money and the associated financial risks at the reporting date. Discount rate reflects the yield curve in the appropriate currency for instruments that expose the holder to no or negligible credit risk, adjusted to reflect the liquidity characteristics of payment of future incurred claims.
Assumptions and interdependencies
Level of aggregation and the evaluation of contract boundary are significant assumptions as these define the use of the premium allocation model's simplified measurement model.
Discounting affects in particular long tailed claims where payments may be made as annuity payments or where the assessment of the actual claim takes time. This is the case for claims in motor liability, professional liability, workers' compensation, personal accident and health insurance classes.
Liability for incurred claims is determined for each line of business based on actuarial methods. Where such business lines encompass more than one business area, claims provisions are allocated to segments based on pragmatic criteria. The models currently used are Chain-Ladder, Bornhuetter-Ferguson and the Loss Ratio method among others. Chain-Ladder techniques are used for lines of business with a stable run-off pattern. The Bornhuetter-Ferguson method, and sometimes the Loss Ratio method, are used for accident years in which the future run-off is highly uncertain.
In some instances, historic data used in the actuarial models is not necessarily predictive for the expected future development of claims. This is the case with legislative changes.
In this situation the a priori estimate used for premium increases is used to reflect the expected increase in claims based on the new legislation. This estimate is used for determining the change in the level of claims. The estimate is maintained until new loss history materialises which can be used for re-estimation.
Several assumptions and estimates underlying the calculation of the liability for incurred claims are interdependent. Most importantly, this can be expected to be the case for assumptions relating to interest rates and inflation.
Annuity payments and personal accident are areas in which explicit inflation assumptions are used, with claim payments being indexed based on wage increases or consumer price inflation. Inflation curves that reflects the market's inflation and wage increase expectations are used to approximate the future indexation.
For other lines of business, with implicit inflation assumptions, the actuarial models will cause a certain lag in predicting the level of future losses when a change in inflation occurs. On the other hand, the effect of discounting will show immediately as a consequence of inflation changes to the extent that such changes affect the interest rate.
Other correlations are deemed not to be significant.
{184}------------------------------------------------
Notes
22 Insurance contract liabilities (continued)
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liability for remainingcoverage | Liabilities for incurred claimsfor contracts under the PAA | Liability for remainingcoverage | Liabilities for incurred claimsfor contracts under the PAA | |||||||
| DKKm | Excluding losscomponent | Losscomponent | Present valueof future cashflows | Riskadjustmentfor nonfinancial risk | Total | Excluding losscomponent | Losscomponent | Present valueof future cashflows | Riskadjustmentfor nonfinancial risk | Total |
| Balance at 31 December 2024 | 6,022 | 1 | 38,797 | 2,149 | 46,969 | |||||
| Transfer between LIC and AIC | -488 | -488 | ||||||||
| Balance as at 1 January | 6,022 | 1 | 38,797 | 1,661 | 46,481 | 5,733 | 1 | 41,440 | 2,289 | 49,463 |
| Insurance revenue | -41,515 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -41,515 | -39,974 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -39,974 |
| Incurred claims and other directly attributable expenses | 2,080 | 0 | 27,813 | 281 | 30,174 | 1,665 | 0 | 27,389 | 1,225 | 30,279 |
| Insurance acquisition costs | 3,345 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3,345 | 3,531 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3,531 |
| Run-off previous years adjustments to the LIC | 0 | 0 | -157 | -568 | -724 | 0 | 0 | -262 | -1,378 | -1,640 |
| Insurance service expenses (gross) | 5,425 | 0 | 27,656 | -286 | 32,795 | 5,196 | 0 | 27,127 | -153 | 32,171 |
| Profit/loss on gross business | -36,090 | 0 | 27,656 | -286 | -8,720 | -34,779 | 0 | 27,127 | -153 | -7,804 |
| Net finance income/expense from insurance contracts | -5 | 0 | 293 | 51 | 339 | 1 | 0 | 733 | 13 | 747 |
| Total income statement (gross) | -36,095 | 0 | 27,949 | -236 | -8,381 | -34,777 | 0 | 27,860 | -139 | -7,057 |
| Cash flows | ||||||||||
| Insurance revenue receiveda) | 41,631 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 41,631 | 40,262 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40,262 |
| Claims and other directly attributable expenses paidb) | -2,080 | 0 | -27,152 | 0 | -29,232 | -1,665 | 0 | -30,502 | 0 | -32,167 |
| Insurance acquisition costs cash flowsc) | -3,345 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -3,345 | -3,531 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -3,531 |
| Total Cash Flows | 36,206 | 0 | -27,152 | 0 | 9,053 | 35,066 | 0 | -30,502 | 0 | 4,564 |
| Closing insurance contract liabilities | 6,133 | 1 | 39,594 | 1,425 | 47,153 | 6,022 | 1 | 38,797 | 2,149 | 46,969 |
| -Balance as at 31 December | 6,133 | 1 | 39,594 | 1,425 | 47,153 | 6,022 | 1 | 38,797 | 2,149 | 46,969 |
a) Insurance revenue received includes premiums received, change in liability for remaining coverage from business combinations (Trygg-Hansa), change in debt and receivable and exchange rate adjustment from local currency to group currency
The calculated risk adjustment corresponds to the confidence level of 65% at 31 December 2025 (75% at 31 December 2024).
b) Claims and other directly attributable expenses paid include claims paid, claims from IFRS 3 business combinations (Trygg-Hansa), change in debt and receivable and exchange rate adjustment from local currency to group currency. Liability for remaining coverage includes administration costs related to insurance contracts
c) Tryg has chosen to expense acquisition cost as they incur
{185}------------------------------------------------
23 Pensions and similar obligations
Employee benefits
Pension obligations
The Group operates various pension schemes. The schemes are funded through contributions to insurance companies or trustee-administered funds. In Norway, the Group operated a defined-benefit plan which was closed at 1 January 2020. In Denmark, the Group operates a defined-contribution plan. A defined-contribution plan is a pension plan under which the Group pays fixed contributions into a separate entity (a fund) and will have no legal or constructive obligation to pay further contributions. In Sweden, the Group complies with the industry pension agreement, FTP-Planen. FTP-Planen is primarily a defined-benefit plan as regards the future pension benefits. Försäkringsbranschens Pensionskassa (FPK) is unable to provide sufficient information for the Group to use defined-benefit accounting. The plan is on that basis accounted for as a defined-contribution plan. As part of the termination of the defined-benefit plan in Norway, an agreement of compensation to the employees covered by the plan was agreed. A liability has been established to cover the expected compensation to be paid to the employees upon retirement from the company.
If the employee leaves before retirement only a part of the compensation is paid. There are no future actuarial assumptions related to the liability, only uncertainty is whether the employees stays to retirement or not.
Other employee benefits
Some employees are entitled to a fixed payment when they reach retirement and when they have been employed with the Group for 25 and for 40 years. The Group recognises this liability at the time of signing the contract of employment.
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Jubilees, pensions and other obligations | 33 | 20 |
| Compensation liability | 2 | 8 |
| Recognised liability | 35 | 28 |
| Defined-benefit pension plans Norway: | ||
| Present value of pension obligations funded through operations | 27 | 29 |
| Specification of change in recognised pension obligations | ||
| Recognised pension obligation at 1 January | 29 | 26 |
| Exchange rate adjustments | 0 | -1 |
| Capital cost of previously earned pensions | 4 | 7 |
| Actuarial gains/losses | -1 | 1 |
| Paid during the period | -5 | -4 |
| Recognised pension obligation at 31 December | 27 | 29 |
| Total pensions and similar obligations at 31 December | 27 | 29 |
| Total recognised obligation at 31 December | 62 | 57 |
| Specification of pension cost for the year: | ||
| Present value of pensions earned during the year | 3 | 6 |
| Accrued employer contributions | 1 | 1 |
| Total year's cost of defined-benefit plans | 4 | 7 |
| The premium for the following financial years is estimated at | 1 | 1 |
| Number of pensioners | 96 | 105 |
| Assumptions used | % | % |
| Discount rate | 3.6 | 2.8 |
| Salary adjustments | 4.0 | 3.5 |
| Pension adjustments | 2.7 | 1.9 |
| G adjustments | 3.8 | 3.3 |
| Turnover | 7.0 | 7.0 |
| Employer contributions | 14.1 | 19.1 |
{186}------------------------------------------------
23 Pensions and similar obligations (continued)
Description of the Swedish plan
Trygg-Hansa, a branch of Tryg Forsikring A/S, complies with the Swedish industry pension agreement, the FTP plan, which is insured with Försäkringsbranschens Pensionskassa - FPK.
Under the terms of the agreement, the Group's Swedish branch has undertaken, along with the other businesses in the collaboration, to pay the pensions of the individual employees in accordance with the applicable rules.
The FTP plan is primarily a defined-benefit plan in terms of the future pension benefits. FPK is unable to provide sufficient information for the Group to use defined-benefit accounting. For this reason, the Group has accounted for the plan as if it were a definedcontribution plan in accordance with IAS 19.30.
This year's premium paid to FPK amounted to DKK 21m (DKK 17m in 2024), which is about 6.2% (3.0% in 2024) of the annual premium in FPK (2024). FPK writes in its annual report for 2024 that it had a solvency ratio of 131 at 31 December 2024 (Solvency ratio 126 at 31 December 2023). The Solvency Ratio is defined as the own funds relative to the solvency capital requirement.
24 Deferred tax
Accounting policy
Deferred tax is measured according to the statement of financial position liability method on all timing differences between the tax and accounting value of assets and liabilities. Deferred income tax is measured using the tax rules and tax rates that apply in the relevant countries on the statement of financial position date when the deferred tax asset is realised, or the deferred income tax liability is settled.
Deferred income tax assets, including the tax value of tax losses carried forward, are recognised to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profit will be realised against which the temporary differences can be offset.
Deferred income tax is provided on temporary differences concerning investments, except where Tryg controls when the temporary difference will be realised, and it is probable that the temporary difference will not be realised in the foreseeable future.
{187}------------------------------------------------
Notes
24 Deferred tax (continued)
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Tax assets | ||
| Land, buildings and operating equipment | 5 | 14 |
| Bonds | 0 | 4 |
| Debt and provisions | 355 | 327 |
| 360 | 345 | |
| Tax liability | ||
| Intangible rights | 1,961 | 1,954 |
| Land and buildings | 195 | 84 |
| Bonds | 11 | 0 |
| Debt and provisions | 0 | 1 |
| Contingency funds | 1,029 | 1,086 |
| 3,197 | 3,125 | |
| Deferred tax | 2,836 | 2,780 |
| Development in deferred tax | ||
| Deferred tax at 1 January | 2,780 | 3,368 |
| Exchange rate adjustments | 146 | -106 |
| Change in deferred tax previous years | 65 | -76 |
| Change in tax loss to carry forward | 6 | 0 |
| Change in deferred tax recognised in income statement | -155 | -405 |
| Change in valuation of tax asset | -6 | 0 |
| Change in deferred tax recognised in equity | 0 | 0 |
| Deferred tax at 31 December | 2,836 | 2,780 |
Tax value of non-capitalised tax loss
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loss | Tax value | Loss | Tax value | |
| Netherlands | 22 | 4 | 30 | 6 |
| Switzerland | 30 | 5 | 26 | 4 |
| Belgium | 4 | 1 | 13 | 3 |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 2 | 14 | 3 |
| Ireland | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 |
| Total | 66 | 12 | 88 | 16 |
Tax loss determined according to United Kingdom, Belgium, Dutch and Austria tax rules can be carried forward indefinitely, however in some countries with yearly limitations to be applied. In Switzerland tax losses can be carried forward 7 years. The tax losses are not recognised as tax assets as it has not been substantiated that the local entities/ branches can generate sufficient future taxable income within 3-5 years to offset the tax losses.
The total current and deferred tax relating to items recognised in equity is recognised in the statement of financial position in the amount of DKK 52m (DKK -68m at 31 December 2024).
{188}------------------------------------------------
Notes
25 Other provisions
Accounting policy
Provisions are recognised when the Group has a legal or constructive obligation because of an event prior to or at the Statement of Financial Position date, and it is probable to result in economic outflow from the Group. Provisions are measured at the best estimate by management of the expenditure required to settle the present obligation.
Provisions for restructuring are recognised as obligations when a detailed formal restructuring plan has been decided and announced prior to or at the Statement of Financial Position date. Includes severance pay in connection with retirement of employees.
Own insurance is included under other provisions. The provisions apply to the Group's own insurance claims and are reported when the damage occurs according to the same principle as the Group's other claims provisions.
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Other provisions at 1 January | 84 | 223 |
| Exchange rate adjustments | 0 | -2 |
| Change in provisions | 0 | -137 |
| Other provisions at 31 December | 83 | 84 |
Other provisions primarily relate to the bankruptcy of Gefion and the Group's own insurance claims. The maturity of the obligation is within 5 years.
26 Earnings per share, operating earnings per share
Accounting policy
Key ratios
Earnings per share (EPS) is calculated according to IAS 33. This and other key ratios are calculated in accordance with Recommendations and Ratios issued by the CFA Society Denmark.
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit/loss for the period cf. Income statement | 5,405 | 4,816 |
| Adjusted for interest on Additional Tier 1 capital cf. equity | -67 | -73 |
| Profit/loss from continuing business to shareholders of Tryg | 5,338 | 4,742 |
| Amortisation on intangible assets related to customer relations after tax | 710 | 735 |
| Operating Profit/loss for the period | 6,048 | 5,477 |
| Average number of shares ('000) | 604,762 | 615,441 |
| Diluted number of shares ('000) | 606,298 | 615,903 |
| Earnings per share, continuing business | 8.83 | 7.71 |
| Diluted earnings per share, continuing business | 8.80 | 7.70 |
| Earnings per share | 8.83 | 7.71 |
| Diluted earnings per share | 8.80 | 7.70 |
| Operating earnings per sharea) | 10.00 | 8.90 |
a) Calculated as operating profit/loss for the period divided by average number of shares in the period.
{189}------------------------------------------------
Notes
27 Other debt
Accounting policy Lease liability
The lease liability is initially measured at the present value of the lease payments that are not paid at the commencement date, discounted by using the rate implicit in the lease. If this rate cannot be readily determined, Tryg uses its incremental borrowing rate. Subsequently, the lease liability is measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method and is presented as part of other debt. The lease liability is remeasured (based on indexation or contract changes) to reflect changes in future lease payments. A corresponding adjustment is made to the carrying amount of the ROU asset.
Debt
Debt comprises amounts owed to credit institutions, current tax obligations, trade payables and other debt. Other liabilities are assessed at amortised cost based on the effective interest method.
Debt related to leasing and external investors share of investment assets is included in other debt. External investors share of investment assets relates to bonds and investment properties.
Repo deposits from credit institutions are recognised and measured at amortised cost, and the return is recognised as interest expenses in the income statement.
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Accrued costs | 1,539 | 1,381 |
| External customersa) | 0 | 634 |
| Lease liabilities | 809 | 856 |
| Unsettled fund transactions | 518 | 1,965 |
| Other | 1,507 | 1,232 |
| Other debt at 31 December | 4,373 | 6,068 |
a) External customers have been redeemed during the financial year.
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Maturity of undiscounted lease liabilities | ||
| Due 1 year or less | 186 | 170 |
| Due 2-5 years | 352 | 387 |
| Due more than 5 years | 481 | 539 |
| Total undiscounted lease liabilities 31 December | 1,019 | 1,096 |
| Lease liabilities included in the statement of financial position | ||
| Hereof future cash flow of contract options | 24 | 21 |
| Amounts recognised in the statement of cash flow | ||
| Total cash out-flow for leases | 182 | 210 |
| Amounts recognised in the income statement | ||
| Interest on lease liabilities | -40 | -47 |
There are no short-term leases recognised in the financial statement.
Please refer to note 15 for specification of ROU assets.
{190}------------------------------------------------

28 Contractual obligations, collateral and contingent liabilities
| Contractual obligations | Obligations due by period | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DKKm2025 | <1 year | 1-3 years | 3-5 years | >5 years | Total |
| Other contractual obligationsa) | 819 | 1,014 | 499 | 160 | 2,492 |
| 819 | 1,014 | 499 | 160 | 2,492 | |
| 2024 | |||||
| Other contractual obligationsa)- | 751 | 506 | 155 | 117 | 1,529 |
| 751 | 506 | 155 | 117 | 1,529 |
a) Other contractual obligations mainly consists of investment commitments, IT and outsourcing agreements. Please refer to note 15 for lease agreements recognised as ROU assets.
Tryg has signed the following material contracts above DKK 50m
Tryg is committed to invest in some investment funds. The commitment amounts to DKK 172m (DKK 573m in 2024) of which DKK 90m are expected called during 2026 (DKK 166m in 2024), additionally DKK 57m (DKK 308m in 2024) within 5 years and DKK 25m (DKK 99m in 2024) after 5 years.
Tryg has signed IT infrastructure agreements with commitments amounting to DKK 1,897m (DKK 489m in 2024) within 5 years.
Tryg Group's Danish companies are in majority part of a joint taxation with TryghedsGruppen smba, with some exemptions due to Danish legislation. TryghedsGruppen smba is the administration company in the Danish joint taxation group. The Danish companies under the joint taxation group are jointly liable for any taxes to be withheld and paid in the group, including income taxes, and taxes withheld at source such as taxes on interest and dividends.
Contingent liabilities
Price adjustments 2016-2020
At the end of October 2020 Tryg received the Danish Consumer Ombudsman's assessment of the case. In the Danish Consumer Ombudsman's opinion Tryg was not complying with regulations on giving notice for price adjustments for private customers when increasing prices above normal indexation between March 2016 and February 2020. The case is related to a part of the private portfolio in Denmark. Based on this assessment the Danish Consumer Ombudsman concluded that certain customers may have a recovery claim against Tryg. Tryg does not agree with the Danish Consumer
Ombudsman's assessment as Tryg believes it has followed the applicable regulation and guidelines stated by the Danish Financial Supervisory Authority ("FSA") in terms of price increases. In April 2022 the Danish Consumer Ombudsman decided that the case should be tested in court.
On 5 April 2024 the Danish Maritime & Commercial Court has ruled in favour of the Danish Consumer Ombudsman arguments against Tryg. Tryg has appealed the decision and the permission to appeal has been granted by the Danish Supreme Court. During the first quarter of 2026 Tryg expects to receive a ruling from the Danish Supreme Court on a historical pricing practice in part of the Danish business to consumers segment in the period between 2016 and 2020.
The Executive Board has decided not to disclose any amount but the case is deemed to have immaterial financial consequences for Tryg's equity and solvency position.
Other
Companies in the Group are party to a number of other disputes in Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Furthermore, the Group is also aware of general disputes related to the industry. Based on available information, the Executive Board believes that the disputes related to the insurance industry will not affect the Group's financial position significantly beyond the obligations recognised in the statement of financial position at 31 December 2025. The disputes are continuously evaluated.
Securities for insurance provisions
Tryg Livsforsikring A/S and Forsikrings-Aktieselskabet Alka Liv II have merged in 2025. Tryg Livforsikring A/S has registered the following assets as having been held as security for the insurance provisions:
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Equity investments | 0 | 500 |
| Bonds | 982 | 645 |
| Interest and rent receivable | 2 | 3 |
| 985 | 1,149 |
{191}------------------------------------------------

28 Contractual obligations, collateral and contingent liabilities (continued)
Offsetting and collateral in relation to financial assets and liabilities
Collateral which is not offset in the statement of financial position
| statement of financial position | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grossamountbefore | Accordingto thestatementof financial | Furtheroffsetting,masternetting | |||||
| DKKm | 2025 | offsetting | Offsetting | position | agreements | Collateral | Net amount |
| Assets | |||||||
| Derivative financial | |||||||
| instruments | 1,085 | -508 | 577 | -541 | -28 | 9 | |
| 1,085 | -508 | 577 | -541 | -28 | 9 | ||
| Liability | |||||||
| Repurchaseagreement | 4,200 | 0 | 4,200 | 0 | -4,200 | 0 | |
| Derivative financial | |||||||
| instruments | 1,868 | -508 | 1,361 | -541 | -809 | 11 | |
| 6,068 | -508 | 5,560 | -541 | -5,009 | 11 | ||
| 2024 | |||||||
| Assets | |||||||
| Reverse repurchase | |||||||
| agreement | 340 | 0 | 340 | 0 | -340 | 0 | |
| Derivative financial | |||||||
| instruments | 1,321 | -659 | 661 | -550 | -109 | 2 | |
| 1,661 | -659 | 1,002 | -550 | -450 | 2 | ||
| Liability | |||||||
| Repurchase | |||||||
| agreement | 3,684 | 0 | 3,684 | 0 | -3,684 | 0 | |
| Derivative financial | |||||||
| instruments | 1,708 | -659 | 1,048 | -550 | -494 | 4 | |
| 5,392 | -659 | 4,732 | -550 | -4,178 | 4 |
Financial assets and liabilities are offset and the net amount reported when the Group and the counterparty have a legally enforceable right of set-off and have agreed to settle on a net basis or to realise the asset and settle the liability.
Positive and negative fair values of derivative financial instruments with the same counterparty are offset if it has been agreed to settle contractual payments on a net basis when cash payments are made or collateral is provided on a daily basis in case of fair value changes. The Group's netting of positive and negative fair values of derivative financial instruments may be cleared (CCP clearing) through London Clearing House.
Furthermore, netting is carried out in accordance with enforceable master netting agreements. Master netting agreements and similar agreements entitle parties to offset in the event of default, which further reduces the exposure to a defaulting counterparty but does not meet the conditions for accounting offsetting in the Statement of Financial Position.
29 Related parties
The Group has no related parties with a controlling influence other than the parent company, TryghedsGruppen smba and the subsidiaries of TryghedsGruppen smba (other related parties). Related parties include the Supervisory Board, the Executive Board (defined as key management) and their members' family. Risk-takers are not key management.
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Premium income | ||
| - Parent company (TryghedsGruppen smba) | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| - Key management | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| - Other related parties | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| Claims payments | ||
| - Parent company (TryghedsGruppen smba) | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| - Key management | 0.4 | 0.1 |
{192}------------------------------------------------
29 Related parties (continued)
Specification of remuneration
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DKKm | Number ofpersons | Base salaryincl. carallowancea) | Share-basedvariablesalaryb) | Cashvariablesalary | Pension | Total | Number ofpersons | Base salaryincl. carallowancea) | Share-basedvariablesalaryb) | Cashvariablesalaryc) | Pension | Total |
| Supervisory Board | 16 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 15 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
| Executive Board | 5 | 33 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 58 | 5 | 33 | 9 | 4 | 8 | 54 |
| Risk-takers staff functions | 34 | 65 | 10 | 8 | 11 | 93 | 34 | 52 | 10 | 3 | 9 | 74 |
| Risk-takers independent control functions | 4 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 |
| Risk-takers other functions | 54 | 99 | 14 | 13 | 15 | 141 | 69 | 109 | 19 | 7 | 17 | 152 |
| 113 | 219 | 32 | 28 | 37 | 316 | 127 | 214 | 38 | 13 | 36 | 301 |
| 2025 | 2024 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number ofpersons(nom.) | Severancepay(DKKm) | Number ofpersons(nom.) | Severancepay(DKKm) | |
| Of which retired | ||||
| Supervisory Board | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Executive Board | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Risk-takers | 6 | 0 | 8 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 9 | 0 |
a) Car allowance is not included in the base salary for the Supervisory Board
b) Total expenses recognised in 2024 and 2025 concerning share-based payment totals allocation in 2025 and previous years. For further details on share-based payment allocated to Executive Board, please refer to "Corporate governance" in Management review (page 32). For further details on remuneration of Supervisory Board and Executive Board, please refer to "Corporate governance" in Management review.
c) Including non-competition clause
{193}------------------------------------------------

29 Related parties (continued)
Base salary are charges incurred during the financial year. Variable salary includes sharebased payment, which are recognised over a deferral period up to 5 years from performance year.
The members of the Supervisory Board in Tryg A/S are paid with a fixed remuneration and are not covered by the incentive schemes.
The members of the Executive Board are paid a fixed remuneration, pension, car allowance, special allowances, and staff benefits.
The variable remuneration for the Executive Board are divided into two incentive programmes; a short-term incentive programme and a long-term incentive programme. The short-term incentive programme for the performance year 2025 is granted in January 2026 with 40% cash, and 60% Restricted Shares Units which are deferred for 5 years. The long-term incentive programme was granted in 2025 with a three-year vesting period with 40% share options and 60% Performance Share Units which are deferred for five years after grant in 2025. Please refer to 'Corporate governance' in Management review.
Each member of the Executive Board is entitled to 12 months' notice and severance pay equal to 12 months' salary plus pension contribution. If a change of control clause is actioned COO is entitled to severance pay equal to 36 months´ salary.
Risk-takers are defined as employees whose activities have a significant influence on the company's risk profile. The Supervisory Board decides which employees should be considered to be risk-takers.
Parent company
TryghedsGruppen smba
TryghedsGruppen smba controls 48.6% (47.9% at 31 December 2024) of the total shares in Tryg A/S. TryghedsGruppen smba has de facto control over Tryg A/S.
This amounts to TryghedsGruppen smba controlling 49.4% (48.1% at 31 December 2024) of the shares outstanding in Tryg A/S as at 31 December 2025.
In 2025 Tryg A/S paid TryghedsGruppen smba dividends of DKK 2,392m (DKK 2,265m in 2024).
The transactions between TryghedsGruppen smba and Tryg A/S is conducted on an arm's length basis.
Intra-group transactions with TryghedsGruppen smba from Tryg Forsikring A/S consists of administrative services, IT and data deliveries.
The transactions amounts to DKK 2m (DKK 4m in 2024).
All transactions are conducted on an arm´s length basis.
{194}------------------------------------------------

30 Share-based payment
Accounting policy
The Group's incentive programmes comprise an employee bonus scheme and incentive programmes for executive board, risk takers and other employees.
A part of the variable remuneration programmes is provided as a share-based long-term incentive programme (LTI) and a short-term incentive programme (STI) with deferral periods.
Read more about the Group's incentive schemes in detail in the Remuneration Report 2025 and remuneration policy at tryg.com/en/governance/remuneration
Employee bonus scheme
According to the remuneration policy, the Group's employees can be granted a bonus in the form of free shares. When the bonus is granted, employees can choose between receiving shares or cash. The expected value of the shares will be expensed over the performance period. The scheme will be treated as a financial instrument, consisting of the right to cash settlement and the right to request delivery of shares. The difference between the value of shares and the cash payment is recognised in equity and is not remeasured. The remainder is treated as a liability and is remeasured until the time of exercise, such that the total recognition is based on the actual number of shares or the actual cash amount.
Conditional shares
Conditional shares have been allocated to some employees in accordance with the Group's incentive programmes.
Equity-settled conditional shares are measured at the fair value at the grant date and recognised under staff costs over the period from the grant date until the end of the deferral period (the transfer date), where the holder receive free shares.
The shares are recognised at market value and are accrued from up to five years from performance year. If the holder retires during the deferral period but remains entitled to shares, the remaining expense is recognised in the current accounting year.
Matching shares
Matching shares have been allocated to some employees in accordance with the Group's incentive programmes.
The shares are recognised at market value and are accrued over the three or four year deferral period, based on the market price at the time of acquisition. Recognition is from the end of the month of acquisition under staff costs with a balancing entry directly in equity. If the employee retires during the deferral period but remains entitled to shares, the remaining expense is recognised in the current accounting year.
Share options
Share options have been allocated to some employees in accordance with the Group's incentive programmes.
The share options are recognised at fair value at the grant date based on monte carlo simulations and vests over a three year period from the grant date. The share options are expensed under staff costs over the vesting period, provided that the employee has not resigned from the Group. If the employee retires during the vesting period but remains entitled to share options, the remaining expense is recognised in the current accounting year.
{195}------------------------------------------------
Notes
30 Share-based payment (continued)
| Matching shares | Total Numbers | Fair Value | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | ExecutiveBoard | Risk-takers | Other | Total | Averagevalue permatchingshare atgrant dateDKK | Total valueat time ofallocationDKKm | Value permatchingshare at 31DecemberDKK | Total fairvalue at 31DecemberDKKm |
| Matching shares granted in 2025 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Allocated in 2011 - 2024 | 262,901 | 129,330 | 411,790 | 804,021 | 140 | 112 | 167 | 134 |
| Category changes and addition | 0 | -315 | 315 | 0 | 140 | 0 | 167 | 0 |
| Cancelled | -14,328 | -7,476 | -53,063 | -74,867 | 140 | -10 | 167 | -12 |
| Exercised | -248,573 | -106,175 | -317,267 | -672,015 | 140 | -94 | 167 | -112 |
| Carrying amount at 31 December | 0 | 15,364 | 41,775 | 57,139 | 140 | 8 | 167 | 10 |
| 2024 | ||||||||
| Matching shares granted in 2024 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Allocated in 2011 - 2023 | 262,901 | 103,203 | 437,916 | 804,021 | 140 | 112 | 152 | 122 |
| Category changes and addition | 0 | 26,126 | -26,126 | 0 | 140 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cancelled | -14,328 | -7,476 | -49,958 | -71,762 | 140 | -10 | 152 | -11 |
| Exercised | -248,573 | -87,363 | -270,071 | -606,007 | 140 | -85 | 152 | -92 |
| Carrying amount at 31 December | 0 | 34,491 | 91,761 | 126,252 | 140 | 18 | 114 | 19 |
Matching shares
In accordance with the Group's remuneration policy the Group has on agreed terms allocated matching shares for some employees.
Executive Board, Risk-takers and Other employees are allocated one share in Tryg A/S for each share acquired in Tryg A/S at market price for liquid cash at a contractually agreed sum over a deferral period of up to 4 years. In 2025, the recognised fair value of matching shares for the Group amounted to DKK 5m (DKK 9m in 2024). At 31 December 2025, total fair value related to matching shares amounted to DKK 10m (DKK 19m in 2024). The number of shares is adjusted for dividend paid, no expected dividend is included.
{196}------------------------------------------------
Notes
30 Share-based payment (continued)
| Conditional shares | Total Numbers | Fair Value | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | ExecutiveBoard | Risk-takers | Other | Total | Averagevalue perconditionalshare atgrant dateDKK | Total valueat time ofallocationDKKm | Value perconditionalshare at 31DecemberDKK | Total fairvalue at 31DecemberDKKm |
| Conditional shares granted in 2025 | 65,586 | 140,793 | 147,149 | 353,528 | 160 | 57 | 167 | 59 |
| Allocated in 2018 - 2024 | 187,184 | 766,642 | 616,742 | 1,570,568 | 168 | 264 | 167 | 261 |
| Category changes and addition | 0 | -44,746 | 44,746 | 0 | 168 | 0 | 167 | 0 |
| Cancelled | 0 | -17,070 | -18,439 | -35,509 | 168 | -6 | 167 | -6 |
| Exercised | -83,892 | -531,486 | -420,751 | -1,036,129 | 168 | -174 | 167 | -173 |
| Carrying amount at 31 December | 103,292 | 173,340 | 222,298 | 498,930 | 168 | 84 | 167 | 83 |
| 2024 | ||||||||
| Conditional shares granted in 2024 | 35,556 | 54,977 | 97,592 | 188,125 | 161 | 30 | 152 | 29 |
| Allocated in 2018 - 2023 | 147,003 | 781,378 | 422,729 | 1,351,110 | 169 | 228 | 152 | 205 |
| Category changes and addition | 4,625 | -69,713 | 96,421 | 31,333 | 169 | 5 | 152 | 5 |
| Cancelled | 0 | -14,208 | -12,857 | -27,065 | 169 | -5 | 152 | -4 |
| Exercised | -74,525 | -429,680 | -338,681 | -842,886 | 169 | -143 | 152 | -128 |
| Carrying amount at 31 December | 77,103 | 267,777 | 167,612 | 512,492 | 169 | 87 | 152 | 78 |
Conditional shares
In accordance with the Group's remuneration policy the Group has on agreed terms allocated conditional shares for some employees.
Executive Board, Risk-takers and Other employees are allocated shares in Tryg A/S if certain conditions, such as financial, and non-financial targets, combined with employment with the Group in the deferral period, are fulfilled over a period of up to 5 years from performance year 2025. In 2025, the recognised fair value of conditional shares for the Group amounted to DKK 47m (DKK 49m in 2024). At 31 December 2025, total fair value related to conditional shares amounted to DKK 142m (DKK 106m in 2024).
{197}------------------------------------------------

30 Share-based payment (continued)
| Share options | Total Numbers | Fair Value | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Averagevalue per | Value pershare | |||||||
| share | Total value | option at | Total fair | |||||
| option at | at time of | 31 | value at 31 | |||||
| Executive | grant date | allocation | December | December | ||||
| 2025 | Board | Risk-takers | Other | Total | DKK | DKKm | DKK | DKKm |
| Share options granted in 2025 | 295,038 | 270,328 | 0 | 565,366 | 23 | 13 | 167 | 94 |
Share options
In accordance with the Group's remuneration policy the Group has on agreed terms allocated share options for some employees in 2025.
Executive Board and Risk-takers are allocated share options in Tryg A/S combined with employment with the Group over the vesting period. In 2025, the recognised fair value of share options for the Group amounted to DKK 4m. At 31 December 2025, total fair value related to share options amounted to DKK 94m.
The share options are linked to Tryg A/S' share price development and expected dividends for the vesting period. The exercise price has been determined above 100% of the share price at the time of grant, and will be subject to dividend adjustment. A cap has been determined, limiting the gain on the share option grant in the exercise period in any year from exceeding 25% of the annual salary in the grant year. The exercise period for share options are two years after the vesting period of three years plus a lock-up period of six month.
| Assumptions used | 2025 |
|---|---|
| Expected volatility (%) | 16.7 |
| Expected life (years) | 5.5 |
| Expected dividends per share (DKK) | 8.2 - 9.0 |
| Risk-free interest rate (%) | 2.1 |
| Fair value at measurement date per share option (DKK) | 14.7 |
{198}------------------------------------------------
31 Financial highlights
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Insurance revenue | 41,515 | 39,974 | 39,126 | 38,365 | 25,369 |
| Insurance service expenses | -32,795 | -32,171 | -32,153 | -30,619 | -20,947 |
| Net expenses from reinsurance contracts | -775 | -748 | -507 | -576 | -727 |
| Insurance service result | 7,945 | 7,056 | 6,465 | 7,174 | 3,695 |
| Net investment resulta) | 778 | 911 | 565 | -1,979 | 1,012 |
| Other income and costs | -1,511 | -1,664 | -2,001 | -2,143 | -752 |
| Profit/loss before tax | 7,212 | 6,303 | 5,029 | 3,051 | 3,956 |
| Tax | -1,807 | -1,488 | -1,178 | -804 | -795 |
| Profit/loss on continuing business | 5,405 | 4,816 | 3,851 | 2,247 | 3,161 |
| Profit/loss on discontinued and divested business | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -3 |
| Profit/loss for the period | 5,405 | 4,816 | 3,851 | 2,247 | 3,158 |
| Other comprehensive income | |||||
| Other comprehensive income which cannot subsequently be reclassified as profit or loss | 1 | -1 | -1 | -2 | 0 |
| Other comprehensive income which can subsequently be reclassified as profit or loss | 1,406 | -837 | -8 | -1,828 | -36 |
| Other comprehensive income | 1,407 | -838 | -9 | -1,830 | -36 |
| Comprehensive income | 6,812 | 3,978 | 3,842 | 417 | 3,122 |
| Run-off gains/losses, net of reinsurance | 895 | 832 | 1,166 | 2,225 | 777 |
| Run-off gains/losses, Gross | 724 | 1,640 | 1,802 | 2,586 | 763 |
| Statement of financial position | |||||
| Insurance contracts liabilities | 47,153 | 46,969 | 49,463 | 49,063 | 32,968 |
| Assets from reinsurance contracts | 2,194 | 2,974 | 3,060 | 2,823 | 2,244 |
| Total equity | 39,620 | 38,864 | 40,351 | 42,504 | 49,008 |
| Total assets | 103,665 | 104,376 | 112,940 | 113,387 | 99,245 |
| Key figures and ratios | |||||
| Gross claims ratio | 64.9 | 66.3 | 67.9 | 64.2 | 69.5 |
| Net reinsurance ratio | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1.4 | 1.7 | 2.9 |
| Claims ratio, net of reinsurance | 66.9 | 68.3 | 69.2 | 65.9 | 72.4 |
| Expense ratio | 13.4 | 13.5 | 13.4 | 13.5 | 13.1 |
| Combined ratio | 80.3 | 81.7 | 82.6 | 79.4 | 85.4 |
| Operating ratioRelative run-off gains/losses | 80.32.4 | 81.72.9 | 82.62.7 | 79.42.9 | 85.41.8 |
| Return on equity after tax (%) | 13.7 | 12.2 | 9.4 | 4.9 | 7.8 |
| Share price (DKK) | 166.50 | 151.50 | 146.90 | 165.35 | 161.50 |
| Market price/Net asset value | 2.5 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 2.5 | 2.2 |
| Price/Earnings | 18.9 | 19.7 | 24.2 | 47.6 | 29.3 |
a) Tryg's acquisition of RSA Scandinavia affects the Financial Statement from closing the 1 June 2021. In 2022 net investment return includes income from RSA Scandinavia of DKK 34m (2021: DKK 1,206m) and includes net effect from demerger and sale of Codan Denmark. Tryg's acquisition of the activities in Trygg-Hansa and Codan Norway were fully consolidated in the Financial Statements from the 1 April 2022
Note: Tryg has changed the presentation of externally given inflation assumptions measured as part of the insurance liabilities. Comparative figures have been restated accordingly.
{199}------------------------------------------------
Income and comprehensive income statement
| Parent company | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 | |
| Note | |||
| Investment activities | |||
| 1 | Income from subsidiaries | 5,458 | 4,859 |
| Income from associates | 0 | -1 | |
| Interest income | 0 | 6 | |
| 2 | Value adjustment | 0 | -9 |
| Interest expenses | -9 | -12 | |
| Administration expenses in connection with investment activities | -6 | -6 | |
| Total investment return | 5,442 | 4,836 | |
| 3 | Other costs | -130 | -122 |
| Profit/loss before tax | 5,312 | 4,715 | |
| 4 | Tax | 27 | 28 |
| Profit/loss for the period | 5,338 | 4,742 | |
| Proposed distribution for the period: | |||
| Dividend | 5,024 | 4,844 | |
| Transferred to reserve for net revaluation according to the equity method | -1,775 | 292 | |
| Transferred to retained earnings | 2,089 | -394 | |
| 5,338 | 4,742 |
| Parent company | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 | |
| Note | |||
| Profit/loss for the period | 5,338 | 4,742 | |
| Other comprehensive income which cannot subsequently be reclassifiedas profit or loss | |||
| Actuarial gains/losses on defined-benefit pension plans | 1 | -1 | |
| Tax on actuarial gains/losses on defined-benefit pension plans | 0 | 0 | |
| 1 | -1 | ||
| Other comprehensive income which can subsequently be reclassified asprofit or loss | |||
| Exchange rate adjustments of foreign entities | 1,545 | -1,030 | |
| Hedging of currency risk in foreign entities | -189 | 262 | |
| Tax on hedging of currency risk in foreign entities | 49 | -68 | |
| 1,406 | -837 | ||
| Total other comprehensive income | 1,407 | -838 | |
| Comprehensive income | 6,745 | 3,905 |
{200}------------------------------------------------
Statement of financial position
| Parent company | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 | |
| Note | |||
| Assets | |||
| 5 | Equity investments in subsidiaries | 38,209 | 38,582 |
| 6 | Equity investments in associates | 0 | 0 |
| Total investments in associates and subsidiaries | 38,210 | 38,582 | |
| Total investment assets | 38,210 | 38,582 | |
| 7 | Current tax assets | 32 | 27 |
| Cash at bank and in hand | 0 | 1 | |
| Total other assets | 33 | 29 | |
| Other prepayments and accrued income | 7 | 0 | |
| Total prepayments and accrued income | 7 | 0 | |
| Total assets | 38,250 | 38,611 |
| Parent company | ||
|---|---|---|
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 |
| Note | ||
| Equity and liabilities | ||
| Equity | 37,964 | 37,877 |
| Debt to subsidiaries | 282 | 684 |
| Other debt | 4 | 50 |
| Total debt | 286 | 734 |
| Total equity and liabilities | 38,250 | 38,611 |
- 8 Contractual obligations, contingent liabilities and collateral
- 9 Related parties
- 10 Reconciliation of profit/loss and equity after Danish FSA and IFRS Accounting Standards
- 11 Accounting policies
{201}------------------------------------------------
Statement of changes in equity
| Parent company | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DKKm | Share capital | Revaluationreserves | Retainedearnings | Proposeddividend | Noncontrollinginterest | Total equity |
| Equity at 31 December 2024 | 3,082 | -419 | 34,012 | 1,202 | 1 | 37,877 |
| 2025 | ||||||
| Profit/loss for the period | -1,775 | 2,090 | 5,024 | -1 | 5,338 | |
| Other comprehensive income | 1,407 | 0 | 1,407 | |||
| Total comprehensive income | 0 | -368 | 2,090 | 5,024 | -1 | 6,745 |
| Nullification of own shares | -25 | 25 | 0 | |||
| Dividend paid | -4,972 | -4,972 | ||||
| Dividend, own shares | 67 | 67 | ||||
| Purchase and sale of own shares | -1,803 | -1,803 | ||||
| Share-based payment | 52 | 52 | ||||
| Total changes in equity in 2025 | -25 | -368 | 430 | 51 | -1 | 88 |
| Equity at 31 December 2025 | 3,057 | -787 | 34,442 | 1,253 | 0 | 37,964 |
| Equity at 1 January 2023 | 3,174 | 126 | 34,889 | 1,174 | 1 | 39,364 |
| 2024 | ||||||
| Profit/loss for the period | 292 | -394 | 4,844 | 4,742 | ||
| Other comprehensive income | -838 | 0 | -838 | |||
| Total comprehensive income | 0 | -545 | -394 | 4,844 | 0 | 3,905 |
| Nullification of own shares | -92 | 92 | 0 | |||
| Dividend paid | -4,816 | -4,816 | ||||
| Dividend, own shares | 76 | 76 | ||||
| Purchase and sale of own shares | -707 | -707 | ||||
| Share-based payment | 56 | 56 | ||||
| Total changes in equity in 2024 | -92 | -545 | -877 | 28 | 0 | -1,487 |
| Equity at 31 December 2024 | 3,082 | -419 | 34,012 | 1,202 | 1 | 37,877 |
{202}------------------------------------------------
1 Income from subsidiaries
| Parent company | ||
|---|---|---|
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 |
| Tryg Invest A/S | 25 | 14 |
| Scandi JV Co A/S | 5 | 7 |
| Tryg Forsikring A/S | 5,428 | 4,838 |
| 5,458 | 4,859 |
2 Value adjustments
Value adjustments only consist of currency adjustments both in 2024 and 2025.
3 Other costs
| Administration expenses | -130 | -122 |
|---|---|---|
| -130 | -122 |
Remuneration for the Executive Board is paid partly by Tryg A/S and partly by Tryg Forsikring A/S and is charged to Tryg A/S via the cost allocation. Refer to note 7 in the Tryg Group for a specification of the audit fee.
| Average number of full-time employees for the year | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|
| ---------------------------------------------------- | --- | ---- |
4 Tax
| Parent company | ||
|---|---|---|
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 |
| Reconciliation of tax costs | ||
| Tax on profit/loss for the year | -38 | -38 |
| Difference between Danish tax percent and local tax percent | 6 | 6 |
| Tax adjustments, previous years | 6 | 0 |
| Adjustment of non-taxabale income and costs | 0 | 4 |
| -27 | -28 | |
| Effective tax rate | % | % |
| Tax on profit/loss for the year | 26.0 | 26.0 |
| Difference between Danish tax percent and local tax percent | -4.0 | -4.0 |
| Tax adjustments, previous years | -4.0 | 0.1 |
| Adjustment of non-taxabale income and costs | 0.1 | -3.0 |
| Net current tax at 31 December | 18.2 | 19.1 |
{203}------------------------------------------------
Notes
5 Equity investments in subsidiaries
| Parent company | ||
|---|---|---|
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 |
| Cost | ||
| Cost at 1 January | 39,001 | 39,043 |
| Additions for the year | 0 | 40 |
| Disposals for the year | 0 | -83 |
| Cost at 31 December | 39,001 | 39,001 |
| Revaluation and impairment to net asset value | ||
| Revaluation and impairment at 1 January | -419 | 126 |
| Revaluations for the year | 6,860 | 4,096 |
| Dividend paid | -7,232 | -4,642 |
| Revaluation and impairment at 31 December | -792 | -419 |
| Carrying amount at 31 December | 38,209 | 38,582 |
| Name, registered office and activity | City | Ownershipshare in % | Profit/loss,DKKm | Equity,DKKm |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | ||||
| Tryg Invest A/Sa) | Ballerup | 100 | 25 | 56 |
| Scandi JV Co A/S | Ballerup | 100 | 5 | 63 |
| Tryg Forsikring A/S | Ballerup | 100 | 5,495 | 39,746 |
| 2024 | ||||
| Tryg Invest A/S | Ballerup | 100 | 14 | 91 |
| Scandi JV Co A/S | Ballerup | 100 | 7 | 58 |
| Tryg Forsikring A/S | Ballerup | 100 | 4,911 | 39,419 |
a) Tryg Invest A/S has entered into voluntary liquidation.
6 Equity investments in associates
| Parent company | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 | |
| Cost | |||
| Cost at 1 January | 0 | 20 | |
| Disposals for the year | 0 | -20 | |
| Cost at 31 December | 0 | 0 | |
| Carrying amount at 31 December | 0 | 0 | |
| 7 | Current tax assets | ||
| Reconciliation of tax costs | |||
| Tax receivable at 1 January | 27 | 151 | |
| Adjustments to previous years | -6 | 0 | |
| Current tax for the year | 32 | 27 | |
| Tax paid for the year | -22 | -151 | |
| Net current tax at 31 December | 32 | 27 |
8 Contractual obligations, contingent liabilities and collateral
Danish companies in Tryg Group are in majority part of a joint taxation with TryghedsGruppen smba, with some exemptions due to Danish legislation. TryghedsGruppen smba is the administration company in the Danish joint taxation group. The Danish companies under the joint taxation group are jointly liable for any taxes to be withheld and paid in the group, including income taxes, and taxes withheld at source such as taxes on interest and dividends.
Tryg A/S has no significant disputes. Management believes that the outcome of these disputes will not affect Tryg A/S' financial position significantly beyond the obligations recognised in the Statement of Financial Position at 31 December 2025.
{204}------------------------------------------------
9 Related parties
Tryg A/S has no related parties with a controlling influence other than the parent company, TryghedsGruppen smba. Related parties with a significant influence include the Supervisory Board, the Executive Board (which is considered Key Management) and their members' related family.
Parent company, TryghedsGruppen smba
TryghedsGruppen smba controls 48.6% (47.9% at 31 December 2024) of the total shares in Tryg A/S. This amounts to TryghedsGruppen smba controlling 49.4% (48.1% at 31 December 2024) of the shares outstanding in Tryg A/S as at 31 December 2025.
Transactions with Group undertakings
Tryg A/S exercises full control over Tryg Forsikring A/S, Scandi JV Co A/S, Scandi Co 3 A/S and Tryg Invest A/S.
In 2025 Tryg Forsikring A/S paid Tryg A/S DKK 7,172m (DKK 4,642m in 2024) and Tryg A/S paid TryghedsGruppen smba DKK 2,392m (DKK 2,265m in 2024) in dividends.
| Parent company | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DKKm | 2025 | 2024 | ||||
| Intra-Group trading involved | ||||||
| - Providing and receiving services | 41 | 18 | ||||
| - Intra-Group accounts | -282 | -684 | ||||
| - Interest | -11 | -12 |
- The intra-group trading is primarily against Tryg Forsikring A/S
- Administration fee, etc. is settled on a cost-recovery basis.
- Intra-group accounts are offset and carry interest on market terms.
Specification of remuneration
| Share | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of | Base salaryincl. car | basedvariable | Cashvariable | ||||
| DKKm | 2025 | persons | allowancea) | salaryb) | salaryc) | Pension | Total |
| Supervisory Board | 16 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | |
| Executive Board | 5 | 33 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 58 | |
| Risk-takersd) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 22 | 46 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 71 |
| Number ofpersons(nom.) | Severancepay(DKKm) | |
|---|---|---|
| Of which retired | ||
| Supervisory Board | 1 | 0 |
| Executive Board | 0 | 0 |
| Risk-takers | 0 | 0 |
| 1 | 0 |
{205}------------------------------------------------
Notes
9 Related parties (continued)
| Parent company | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DKKm | 2024 | Number ofpersons | Base salaryincl. carallowancea) | Sharebasedvariablesalaryb) | Cashvariablesalaryc) | Pension | Total |
| Supervisory Board | 15 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | |
| Executive Board | 5 | 33 | 9 | 4 | 8 | 54 |
Risk-takersd) 1 0 0 0 0 0
21 45 9 4 8 65
| Number ofpersons(nom.) | Severancepay(DKKm) | |
|---|---|---|
| Of which retired | ||
| Supervisory Board | 1 | 0 |
| Executive Board | 0 | 0 |
| Risk-takers | 0 | 0 |
| 1 | 0 |
- a) Car allowance is not included in the base salary for the Supervisory Board
- b) Total expenses recognised in 2024 and 2025 concerning share-based payment totals allocation in 2025 and previous years. For further details on share-based payment allocated to Executive Board, please refer to "Corporate governance" in Management review (page 32). For further details on remuneration of Supervisory Board and Executive Board, please refer to "Corporate governance" in Management review.
- c) Including non-competition clause
- d) Risk-takers in Tryg A/S includes only one employee, wherefore salary and pension is not presented. The amounts are included in note 29 for the Group
Base salary are charges incurred during the financial year. Variable salary includes share-based payment, which are recognised over a deferral period up to 5 years from performance year.
The members of the Supervisory Board in Tryg A/S are paid with a fixed remuneration and are not covered by the incentive schemes.
The members of the Executive Board are paid a fixed remuneration, pension, car allowance, special allowances, and staff benefits.
The variable remuneration for the Executive Board are divided into two incentive programmes; a short-term incentive programme and a long-term incentive programme. The short-term incentive programme for the performance year 2025 is granted in January 2026 with 40% cash, and 60% Restricted Shares Units which are deferred for 5 years. The long-term incentive programme was granted in 2025 with a three-year vesting period with 40% share options and 60% Performance Share Units which are deferred for five years after grant in 2025. Please refer to 'Corporate governance' in Management review. .
Each member of the Executive Board is entitled to 12 months' notice and severance pay equal to 12 months' salary plus pension contribution. If a change of control clause is actioned COO is entitled to severance pay equal to 36 months' salary.
Risk-takers are defined as employees whose activities have a significant influence on the company's risk profile. The Supervisory Board decides which employees should be considered to be risk-takers.
10 Reconciliation of profit/loss and equity after Danish FSA and IFRS Accounting Standards
The executive order on application of IFRS Accounting Standards for companies subject to the Danish Insurance Business Act issued by the Danish FSA requires disclosure of differences between Financial Statement prepared in accordance with the IFRS Accounting Standards and the rules issued by the Danish FSA.
There is no difference in profit/loss or equity recognised after Danish FSA and IFRS Accounting Standards.
11 Accounting policies
Please refer to Tryg Group's general accounting policies in note 1.
{206}------------------------------------------------
Quarterly outline - Segments
| Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DKKm | 2025 | 2025 | 2025 | 2025 | 2024 | 2024 | 2024 | 2024 | 2023 |
| Private | |||||||||
| Insurance revenue | 7,086 | 6,943 | 6,872 | 6,625 | 6,621 | 6,646 | 6,455 | 6,378 | 6,203 |
| Insurance service result | 1,278 | 1,333 | 1,429 | 890 | 1,095 | 1,279 | 1,137 | 735 | 960 |
| Key ratios | |||||||||
| Gross claims ratio | 69.6 | 66.9 | 65.3 | 72.8 | 70.4 | 66.9 | 67.2 | 74.5 | 70.5 |
| Net reinsurance ratio | -0.4 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 2.1 | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| Claims ratio, net of reinsurance | 69.2 | 67.9 | 66.1 | 73.9 | 71.2 | 67.9 | 69.3 | 75.5 | 72.0 |
| Expense ratio | 12.8 | 12.9 | 13.1 | 12.7 | 12.2 | 12.8 | 13.1 | 13.0 | 12.5 |
| Combined ratio | 82.0 | 80.8 | 79.2 | 86.6 | 83.5 | 80.8 | 82.4 | 88.5 | 84.5 |
| Combined ratio exclusive of run-off | 83.8 | 83.0 | 81.8 | 88.1 | 85.4 | 82.5 | 82.0 | 90.5 | 85.5 |
| Commercial | |||||||||
| Insurance revenue | 3,207 | 3,233 | 3,248 | 3,143 | 3,113 | 3,140 | 3,090 | 3,154 | 3,193 |
| Insurance service result | 639 | 849 | 877 | 649 | 613 | 769 | 883 | 544 | 663 |
| Key ratios | |||||||||
| Gross claims ratio | 65.6 | 53.0 | 52.4 | 57.2 | 58.0 | 52.2 | 52.2 | 74.5 | 59.6 |
| Net reinsurance ratio | -1.2 | 6.7 | 6.2 | 7.5 | 6.6 | 8.9 | 4.4 | -6.3 | 4.1 |
| Claims ratio, net of reinsurance | 64.5 | 59.7 | 58.5 | 64.8 | 64.6 | 61.1 | 56.6 | 68.2 | 63.7 |
| Expense ratio | 15.6 | 14.0 | 14.5 | 14.6 | 15.7 | 14.4 | 14.8 | 14.6 | 15.6 |
| Combined ratio | 80.1 | 73.7 | 73.0 | 79.3 | 80.3 | 75.5 | 71.4 | 82.7 | 79.3 |
| Combined ratio exclusive of run-off | 82.7 | 76.6 | 74.6 | 82.4 | 83.8 | 76.9 | 74.0 | 90.6 | 85.3 |
{207}------------------------------------------------
Quarterly outline - Segments
| Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DKKm | 2025 | 2025 | 2025 | 2025 | 2024 | 2024 | 2024 | 2024 | 2023 |
| Group itemsa) | |||||||||
| Insurance revenue | 277 | 281 | 300 | 301 | 312 | 329 | 348 | 390 | 411 |
| Insurance service result | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tryg total | |||||||||
| Insurance revenue | 10,569 | 10,457 | 10,420 | 10,069 | 10,046 | 10,115 | 9,893 | 9,921 | 9,808 |
| Insurance service result | 1,918 | 2,181 | 2,307 | 1,540 | 1,708 | 2,048 | 2,020 | 1,280 | 1,622 |
| Net investment result | 171 | 177 | 110 | 320 | -265 | 526 | 538 | 112 | 178 |
| Other income and costs | -382 | -379 | -381 | -369 | -409 | -441 | -430 | -384 | -411 |
| Profit/loss before tax | 1,707 | 1,980 | 2,035 | 1,491 | 1,033 | 2,134 | 2,129 | 1,007 | 1,389 |
| Tax | -429 | -500 | -504 | -373 | -247 | -523 | -486 | -232 | -258 |
| Profit/loss for the period | 1,277 | 1,479 | 1,531 | 1,118 | 786 | 1,611 | 1,642 | 776 | 1,129 |
| Key ratios | |||||||||
| Gross claims ratio | 68.4 | 62.5 | 61.2 | 67.8 | 66.4 | 62.2 | 62.3 | 74.5 | 66.8 |
| Net reinsurance ratio | -0.7 | 2.8 | 2.5 | 3.1 | 2.7 | 3.6 | 2.8 | -1.4 | 2.4 |
| Claims ratio, net of reinsurance | 67.7 | 65.3 | 63.7 | 70.9 | 69.1 | 65.7 | 65.2 | 73.0 | 69.2 |
| Expense ratio | 13.6 | 13.3 | 13.5 | 13.3 | 13.3 | 13.3 | 13.6 | 13.5 | 13.5 |
| Combined ratio | 81.4 | 78.6 | 77.2 | 84.2 | 82.5 | 79.1 | 78.8 | 86.6 | 82.7 |
| Combined ratio exclusive of run-off | 83.5 | 81.0 | 79.5 | 86.3 | 84.9 | 80.7 | 79.4 | 90.6 | 85.4 |
a) Amounts relating to Trygg-Hansa and Codan Norway acquisitions. Please refer to note 3 operating segments.
A further detailed version of the presentation can be downloaded from
tryg.com/uk>investor> Downloads>tables
{208}------------------------------------------------
Quarterly outline - Geography
| Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DKKm | 2025 | 2025 | 2025 | 2025 | 2024 | 2024 | 2024 | 2024 | 2023 |
| Danish general insurance | |||||||||
| Insurance revenue | 4,636 | 4,633 | 4,667 | 4,629 | 4,556 | 4,609 | 4,571 | 4,471 | 4,434 |
| Insurance service result | 719 | 841 | 912 | 795 | 899 | 973 | 814 | 621 | 760 |
| Run-off gains/losses, net of reinsurance | 129 | 97 | 64 | 64 | 134 | 35 | 79 | 22 | 53 |
| Key ratios | |||||||||
| Gross claims ratio | 69.4 | 65.3 | 63.9 | 67.1 | 63.9 | 61.6 | 62.6 | 72.6 | 69.1 |
| Net reinsurance ratio | 0.1 | 2.5 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 3.5 | 2.8 | 4.5 | -0.2 | 1.1 |
| Claims ratio, net of reinsurance | 69.5 | 67.8 | 66.1 | 69.2 | 67.4 | 64.4 | 67.0 | 72.4 | 70.3 |
| Expense ratio | 15.0 | 14.0 | 14.4 | 13.6 | 12.8 | 14.5 | 15.2 | 13.7 | 12.6 |
| Combined ratio | 84.5 | 81.9 | 80.5 | 82.8 | 80.3 | 78.9 | 82.2 | 86.1 | 82.9 |
| Run-off, net of reinsurance (%) | -2.8 | -2.1 | -1.4 | -1.4 | -2.9 | -0.8 | -1.7 | -0.5 | -1.2 |
| Number of full-time employees, end of period | 3,321 | 3,430 | 3,380 | 3,364 | 3,154 | 3,133 | 3,208 | 3,288 | 3,423 |
| Norwegian general insurance | |||||||||
| NOK/DKK, average rate for the period | 63.75 | 63.32 | 64.49 | 63.39 | 63.24 | 64.18 | 64.17 | 65.61 | 64.25 |
| Insurance revenue | 2,305 | 2,222 | 2,175 | 2,059 | 2,125 | 2,083 | 2,020 | 2,054 | 2,014 |
| Insurance service result | 297 | 375 | 389 | 96 | 130 | 311 | 240 | -45 | 96 |
| Run-off gains/losses, net of reinsurance | 47 | 10 | 29 | 62 | 10 | 51 | 35 | 17 | 56 |
| Key ratios | |||||||||
| Gross claims ratio | 77.5 | 68.3 | 66.9 | 79.8 | 79.5 | 67.5 | 74.7 | 83.6 | 75.2 |
| Net reinsurance ratio | -1.7 | 2.8 | 3.2 | 3.1 | 0.7 | 5.0 | 1.3 | 5.4 | 6.5 |
| Claims ratio, net of reinsurance | 75.8 | 71.1 | 70.1 | 82.8 | 80.3 | 72.5 | 76.0 | 89.0 | 81.7 |
| Expense ratio | 11.3 | 12.0 | 12.0 | 12.5 | 13.6 | 12.5 | 12.1 | 13.2 | 13.6 |
| Combined ratio | 87.1 | 83.1 | 82.1 | 95.3 | 93.9 | 85.1 | 88.1 | 102.2 | 95.2 |
| Run-off, net of reinsurance (%) | -2.0 | -0.5 | -1.4 | -3.0 | -0.5 | -2.5 | -1.7 | -0.8 | -2.8 |
| Number of full-time employees, end of period | 1,318 | 1,370 | 1,352 | 1,326 | 1,318 | 1,327 | 1,331 | 1,352 | 1,350 |
{209}------------------------------------------------
Quarterly outline - Geography
| Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DKKm | 2025 | 2025 | 2025 | 2025 | 2024 | 2024 | 2024 | 2024 | 2023 |
| Swedish general insurance | |||||||||
| SEK/DKK, average rate for the period | 67.99 | 67.11 | 68.47 | 65.55 | 64.96 | 65.24 | 64.53 | 66.60 | 64.33 |
| Insurance revenue | 3,239 | 3,215 | 3,179 | 2,981 | 2,962 | 3,014 | 2,882 | 2,937 | 2,875 |
| Insurance service result | 784 | 941 | 986 | 613 | 627 | 744 | 961 | 700 | 759 |
| Run-off gains/losses, net of reinsurance | 41 | 138 | 141 | 59 | 86 | 72 | -60 | 336 | 139 |
| Key ratios | |||||||||
| Gross claims ratio | 62.3 | 56.1 | 54.7 | 62.8 | 63.7 | 60.9 | 54.2 | 71.8 | 58.0 |
| Net reinsurance ratio | 0.3 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 3.4 | 1.3 | 2.4 | 0.4 | -8.9 | 0.8 |
| Claims ratio, net of reinsurance | 62.5 | 57.7 | 55.8 | 66.1 | 65.0 | 63.2 | 54.5 | 62.9 | 58.8 |
| Expense ratio | 13.3 | 13.0 | 13.2 | 13.3 | 13.8 | 12.1 | 12.1 | 13.3 | 14.8 |
| Combined ratio | 75.8 | 70.7 | 69.0 | 79.4 | 78.8 | 75.3 | 66.6 | 76.2 | 73.6 |
| Run-off, net of reinsurance (%) | -1.3 | -4.3 | -4.4 | -2.0 | -2.9 | -2.4 | 2.1 | -11.4 | -4.8 |
| Number of full-time employees, end of period | 2,023 | 2,086 | 2,090 | 2,022 | 2,085 | 2,076 | 2,058 | 2,033 | 1,973 |
| Other European countriesa) | |||||||||
| Insurance revenue | 113 | 106 | 99 | 99 | 90 | 79 | 72 | 69 | 73 |
| Insurance service result | 118 | 25 | 20 | 35 | 51 | 20 | 6 | 4 | 7 |
| Run-off gains/losses, net of reinsurance | 0 | -1 | 1 | 15 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 4 |
| Number of full-time employees, end of period | 70 | 67 | 68 | 66 | 65 | 64 | 66 | 62 | 59 |
| Group itemsb) | |||||||||
| Insurance revenue | 277 | 281 | 300 | 301 | 312 | 329 | 348 | 390 | 411 |
| Insurance service expenses | -277 | -281 | -300 | -301 | -312 | -329 | -348 | -390 | -411 |
| Insurance service result | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a) Comprises credit & surety insurance (Tryg Trade) in European countries besides Denmark, Norway and Sweden.
b) Reclassification relating to claims provisions from the Trygg-Hansa and Codan Norway acquisition. Please refer to note 3 operating segment.
{210}------------------------------------------------
Quarterly outline - Geography
| Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DKKm | 2025 | 2025 | 2025 | 2025 | 2024 | 2024 | 2024 | 2024 | 2023 |
| Tryg total | |||||||||
| Insurance revenue | 10,569 | 10,457 | 10,420 | 10,069 | 10,046 | 10,115 | 9,893 | 9,921 | 9,808 |
| Insurance service result | 1,918 | 2,181 | 2,307 | 1,540 | 1,708 | 2,048 | 2,020 | 1,280 | 1,622 |
| Net investment result | 171 | 177 | 110 | 320 | -265 | 526 | 538 | 112 | 177 |
| Other income and costs | -382 | -379 | -381 | -369 | -409 | -441 | -430 | -384 | -411 |
| Profit/loss before tax | 1,707 | 1,980 | 2,035 | 1,491 | 1,033 | 2,134 | 2,129 | 1,007 | 1,389 |
| Run-off gains/losses, net of reinsurance | 217 | 244 | 234 | 200 | 233 | 163 | 57 | 380 | 252 |
| Key ratios | |||||||||
| Gross claims ratio | 68.4 | 62.5 | 61.2 | 67.8 | 66.4 | 62.2 | 62.3 | 74.5 | 66.8 |
| Net reinsurance ratio | -0.7 | 2.8 | 2.5 | 3.1 | 2.7 | 3.6 | 2.8 | -1.4 | 2.4 |
| Claims ratio, net of reinsurance | 67.7 | 65.3 | 63.7 | 70.9 | 69.1 | 65.7 | 65.2 | 73.0 | 69.2 |
| Expense ratio | 13.6 | 13.3 | 13.5 | 13.3 | 13.3 | 13.3 | 13.6 | 13.5 | 13.5 |
| Combined ratio | 81.4 | 78.6 | 77.2 | 84.2 | 82.5 | 79.1 | 78.8 | 86.6 | 82.7 |
| Run-off, net of reinsurance (%) | -2.1 | -2.4 | -2.3 | -2.0 | -2.4 | -1.7 | -0.6 | -4.0 | -2.7 |
| Number of full-time employees, end of period | 6,732 | 6,953 | 6,889 | 6,778 | 6,621 | 6,600 | 6,662 | 6,734 | 6,805 |
{211}------------------------------------------------
Group chart

{212}------------------------------------------------
Glossary, key ratios and alternative performance
The financial highlights and key ratios of Tryg have been prepared in accordance with the executive order issued by the Danish Financial Supervisory Authority on the financial reports for insurance companies and lateral pension funds, and also comply with 'Recommendations & Ratios' issued by the CFA Society Denmark.
Claims ratio, net of reinsurance
Gross claims ratio + net reinsurance ratio.
Combined ratio
The sum of the gross claims ratio, the net reinsurance ratio and the gross expense ratio.
Danish general insurance
Comprises the legal entities Tryg Forsikring A/S excluding the Norwegian and Swedish branches, Tryg Livsforsikring A/S.
Diluted average number of shares
Average number of shares adjusted for number of shares which may potentially diluted.
Discounting
Expresses recognition in the financial statements of expected future payments at a value below the nominal amount, as the recognised amount carries interest until payment. Discounting is calculated on the basis of the market-based discount rate applied and the expected time to payment.
Dividend per share
Proposed dividend
Number of shares end of period
Earnings per share
Profit or loss for the period
Average number of shares
Earnings per share of continuing business
Diluted earnings from continuing business after tax
Diluted average number of shares
Gross claims ratio
Gross claims x 100
Insurance revenue
Gross expense ratio
Insurance operating costs x 100
Insurance revenue
Insurance revenue
Expected premium receipts allocated to the period the insurance contract services.
Market price/net asset value
Share price
Net asset value per share
Net asset value per share
Equity end of period
Number of outstanding shares end of period
Net reinsurance ratio
Net expense from reinsurance contracts x 100
Insurance revenue
Norwegian general insurance
Comprises Tryg Forsikring A/S, Norwegian branch.
Other insurance
Comprises credit & surety insurance (Tryg Trade) in European countries besides Denmark, Norway and Sweden and amounts relating to one-off items.
Own funds
Equity plus share of qualifying solvency debt and profit margin (solvency purpose), less intangible assets, tax asset, proposed dividend and share buyback.
Price/Earnings
Share price
Earnings per share
Return on equity after tax (%)
Profit or loss for the period after tax
Weighted average equity
Relative run-off result
Run-off gains/losses net of reinsurance relative to claims provisions net of reinsurance, beginning of year.
{213}------------------------------------------------
Glossary, key ratios and alternative performance measures
Run-off gains/losses
The difference between the claims provisions at the beginning of the financial year (adjusted for foreign currency translation adjustments and discounting effects) and the sum of the claims paid during the financial year and the part of the claims provisions at the end of the financial year pertaining to injuries and damage occurring in earlier financial years.
Solvency II
Solvency requirements for insurance companies issued by the EU Commission is the regulatory framework that the Group operates under.
Solvency ratio
Ratio between own funds and capital requirement.
Swedish general insurance
Comprises Tryg Forsikring A/S, Swedish branches.
Unwinding
Unwinding of discounting takes place with the passage of time as the expected time to payment is reduced. The closer the time of payment, the smaller the discount. This gradual increase of the provision is not recognised under claims, but under investment result in the income statement.
Large claims, net of reinsurance
Large claims, net of reinsurance, as calculated by the Tryg Group, represents
Large claims, net of reinsurance is defined as single claims or claims events gross above 10m in local currencies adjusted for reinsurance.
Large claims, net of reinsurance
Insurance revenue
Weather claims, net of reinsurance
Weather claims, net of reinsurance, as calculated by the Tryg Group, represents:
Weather claims, net of reinsurance, is defined as claims related to storm, cloudbursts, natural perils and winter, adjusted for reinsurance.
Weather claims, net of reinsurance
Insurance revenue
Run-off, net of reinsurance
Run-off, net of reinsurance, as calculated by the Tryg Group, represents
Run-off, net of reinsurance
Insurance revenue
Return on Own Funds (ROOF)
Profit for the period after tax x 100
(Own Funds Opening + Own Funds Closing)/2
Return on Tangible Equity (ROTE)
Profit for the period after tax x 100
(Tangible Equity Opening + Tangible Equity Closing)/2
Tangible Equity
Tangible Equity is defined as weighted average equity excluding intangible assets and deferred tax related to intangible assets.
{214}------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer
Certain statements in this financial report are based on the beliefs of our management as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to management. Statements regarding Tryg's future operating results, financial position, cash flows, business strategy, plans and future objectives other than statements of historical fact can generally be identified by the use of words such as 'targets', 'believes', 'expects', 'aims', 'intends', 'plans', 'seeks', 'will', 'may', 'anticipates', 'would', 'could', 'continues' or similar expressions.
A number of different factors may cause the actual performance to deviate significantly from the forward-looking statements in this financial report, including but not limited to general economic developments, changes in the competitive environment, developments in the financial markets, extraordinary events such as natural disasters or terrorist attacks, changes in legislation or case law and reinsurance.
Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialise, or should any underlying assumptions prove to be incorrect, Tryg's actual financial condition or results of operations could materially differ from that described herein as anticipated, believed, estimated or expected. Tryg is not under any duty to update any of the forwardlooking statements or to conform such statements to actual results, except as may be required by law.
