AI assistant
TIVAN LIMITED — Annual Report 2008
Oct 13, 2008
65967_rns_2008-10-13_ed67a50e-8c90-47ce-a7db-216166eeb9bf.pdf
Annual Report
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
Annual Report 2008
==> picture [171 x 347] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [337 x 110] intentionally omitted <==
ABN 12 000 817 023
DIRECTORS
John W Barr Neil G Biddle Paul E Burton Michael P Bowen Edward J Fry Terence N Smith
(Chairman) (Managing Director) (Exploration Director)
COMPANY SECRETARIES
John W Barr Simon L Robertson
REGISTERED OFFICE
Level 1, 282 Rokeby Road Subiaco Western Australia 6008
PO Box 1126 Subiaco Western Australia 6904
Telephone: (08) 9327 0900 Facsimile: (08) 9327 0901 Website: www.tngltd.com.au
SHARE REGISTRY
Computershare Investor Services Pty Limited Level 2 45 St Georges Terrace Perth Western Australia 6000
Telephone: (08) 9323 2000 Facsimile: (08) 9323 2033
AUDITORS
KPMG
HOME STOCK EXCHANGE
Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) Code: TNG
INTERNATIONAL STOCK EXCHANGE
Frankfurt Stock Exchange Code: HJI
Annual Report 2008
==> picture [92 x 205] intentionally omitted <==
Contents
| Review of Operations | 2 |
|---|---|
| Corporate Governance Statement | 12 |
| Directors’ Report | 20 |
| Auditor’s Independence Declaration | 31 |
| Income Statements | 32 |
| Balance Sheets | 33 |
| Statements of Cash Flows | 34 |
| Statements of Changes in Equity | 35 |
| Notes to the Financial Statements | 37 |
| Directors’ Declaration | 78 |
| Independent Audit Report | 79 |
| ASX Additional Information | 81 |
| 1 |
==> picture [596 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
Review of Operations
The 2007/08 financial year represented another year of strong corporate and exploration activity for TNG.
Overview
The Company achieved a number of important milestones during the 2008 financial year despite difficult and volatile global markets which impacted directly on TNG.
Key Exploration highlights for the year included:
-
Successful 2007 exploration field season completed with results confirming that Manbarrum is emerging as a significant base metal district with 2 deposits now identified.
-
Geological model for Manbarrum as a Mississippi Valley Type (MVT) complex comprising multiple pods of mineralisation now confirmed.
-
Over 37,000 metres of Diamond and RC drilling completed at the Manbarrum Project resulting in numerous high-grade Zn /Pb mineralisation intersections at the Sandy Creek deposit and the discovery of the Djigitbun deposit.
-
A 36 million tonne resource inventory of combined zinc, lead and silver resources has now been defined at the company’s 100% owned Manbarrum Project.
-
Joint Venture Agreement signed with Western Desert Resources Ltd for portfolio of non-core exploration projects.
-
Extensive high-grade hematite outcrop discovered at Legune Prospect, 2km south of the Djibitgun base metal deposit, Manbarrum Project.
-
Significant widths of magnetite bearing vanadium and titanium mineralisation identified from assaying drill core at the Mt Peake Project. Abundant Magnetite over 100m in Gabbro core with XRF assay results up to 34.5% Fe, high vanadium 0.59% V2O5 and titanium 9.81% TiO2.
-
Davis Tube Recovery (magnetic separation) results from primary Mount Peake drill core have demonstrated excellent economic potential by significantly upgrading the mineralisation to an average grade of 55% Fe, 1.15% V2O5 and 16% TiO2.
The Company remains well placed to focus on the exploration of the Manbarrum Project and its other key assets, although due to current commodity prices the immediate focus will shift from base metals to iron ore and other steel making components.
Most importantly, the year’s achievements would not have been possible without the efforts of a highly dedicated consulting and staff group, and the Board thanks everyone involved with the Company for their efforts.
The Board endeavours to be accessible to all shareholders and stakeholders and encourages interested parties to contact the Company directly or via our website at: www.tngltd.com.au .
- Metallurgical test work is progressing on drill core from the Sandy Creek and Djibitgun deposits, with encouraging results to date. Regional exploration programme in progress.
2
Annual Report 2008
Projects
TNG’s main focus during the past year has been the Manbarrum Project in the Northern Territory (NT) of Australia, while at the same time maintaining its interest in a number of other prospective tenements in both the NT and Western Australia and managing its Joint Venture interests (Figure 1).
==> picture [493 x 426] intentionally omitted <==
Fig. 1: Tenement Map and area of operations.
3
==> picture [596 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
MANBARRUM PROJECT: (TNG 100%)
The Manbarrum Project is the Company’s flagship exploration project.
==> picture [494 x 336] intentionally omitted <==
Fig. 2: Manbarrum Project Location.
During the year TNG completed a major exploration programme at Manbarrum with over 37,000 metres of combined RC and Diamond drilling, over 20,000 samples analysed and detailed gravity and Induced Polarisation geophysical surveys completed.
This programme resulted in an updated JORC mineral resource for the Sandy Creek deposit and the discovery of a new mineral resource, the Djibitgun deposit, resulting in a total JORC mineral resource of 36 million tonnes of combined zinc, lead and silver mineralisation. In addition the geophysical surveys have highlighted other priority exploration targets.
Manbarrum is located 82 kilometres north-east of the township of Kununurra. The granted Manbarrum tenements comprise three Exploration Licences and two Authority to Prospect licences (under Section 178) covering a combined area of approximately 600 square kilometres.
TNG has applied for a further two Exploration Licences on the Western Australia side (Figure 2), the Carlton Shelf and
Burt Range areas, which will give comprehensive tenement coverage of the most prospective margins of the Bonaparte Shelf Margin.
The Manbarrum tenements cover a 50 kilometre strike length of the Bonaparte Shelf margin, where widespread Mississippi Valley Type (MVT) Zinc-Lead-Silver mineralisation occurs, and 2 deposits totalling >35mt of combined Zn, Pb Ag have been discovered. High grade haematite mineralisation has also been identified at the Legune Prospect and elsewhere within the tenements confirming the highly prospective nature of the tenement area held by TNG, (Figure 3).
The Company has identified a number of additional geophysical and geochemical targets within its broader tenement area which represent priority exploration targets for further MVT-style mineralisation along strike from the Sandy Creek and Djibitgun deposits, providing confidence that more mineralisation awaits discovery.
4
Annual Report 2008
==> picture [239 x 186] intentionally omitted <==
Fig. 3: Manbarrum Zn, Pb, Ag, and Fe Prospect Location.
SANdY CREEK dEPOSIT:
JORC Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resource of 15.97mt @ 2.3% Zn+Pb, 5.4g/t Ag)
The Sandy Creek mineral resource comprises sphaleritegalena-pyrite type mineralisation. It is almost exclusively a primary sulphide deposit, although some secondary zinc mineralisation may be present in the supergene zone. No lead sulphates (anglesite) or carbonates (cerrusite) have been observed.
The mineralisation is predominantly hosted by a quartzsandy carbonate unit, 100-120m thick. In places, the mineralisation appears to extend into the underlying silty carbonate unit. High-grade galena mineralisation has been intersected in two holes in the saprolitic clays immediately above the main host unit. This zone is also likely to contain zinc oxide mineralisation.
GEOLOGY ANd MINERALISATION
The Manbarrum Project is located on the eastern margin of the Bonaparte Gulf Basin, where DevonianCarboniferous marine sediments unconformably overlie faulted Proterozoic basement. Three Palaeozoic units are recognised in the area: Devonian Cockatoo Group, Lower Carboniferous Burt Range Formation and Milligans Formation.
Milligans Formation black shales and siltstones locally cap the dolomitised Burt Range Formation carbonates and, in conjunction with north-south trending syn-depositional growth faults, provide a prospective setting for MVT base metal sulphide deposits and derivative oxide deposits such as the high grade Legune haematite and Djibitgun ZincSilver resource.
Metallurgical test work
Metallurgical test work is progressing with assessment of the recovery of Zn and Pb from primary sulphide mineralisation in the Sandy Creek drill core. Preliminary results to date are encouraging. This work will be reported when finalised.
Further exploration work
The current Sandy Creek resource excludes the higher grade pipe or lode zones (as reported previously). Further drilling will be oriented to delineate the high grade mineralised trends, to allow inclusion of these into an updated resource estimate.
dJIBITGUN dEPOSIT:
EXPLORATION MOdEL
TNG’s exploration team has confirmed the potential for the Manbarrum Project to host multiple pods of MVT base metal mineralisation of similar scale or larger than the Sandy Creek deposit. Significant derivative oxide deposits have also been identified and present a major exploration target.
The Sandy Creek deposit is interpreted to be a strata-bound carbonate matrix replacement-type zinc-lead deposit, with similarities to several global MVT deposits (for example, the SE Missouri MVT district and the Tri State district, both in the USA). MVT-style mineralisation generally occurs in clusters with numerous mineralised bodies normally present.
JORC Inferred Mineral Resource 19.93mt @ 16.4g/t Ag, 0.5% Zn, Internal zone JORC inferred Mineral Resource 6.7mt @ 2.4% Zn+Pb, 14 g/t Ag)
The Djibitgun Mineral Resource is composed predominantly of a broad Zinc and Silver mineralised zone within an oxidized zone of the prospective quartz sandy – carbonate, host to the Sandy Creek Deposit. The mineralisation commences at approximately 30m and extends to 90m. Higher grade zones are evident within the broad mineralised envelope.
Metallurgical test work
Mineralogical and Metallurgical test work has commenced to evaluate the leaching characteristics of the oxide zinc and silver mineralisation, particularly in the inferred oxide internal resource of 6.7mt @ 2.4% Zn+Pb, 14 g/t Ag. Initial extraction results for Zn and Ag are encouraging, with mineralogical and leach data pending.
5
==> picture [596 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
Further exploration work
The Djibitgun deposit was located by reconnaissance broad spaced drilling. Infill drilling to establish the extent of the internal higher grade Zn and Ag mineralised zone is planned to commence during the next quarter.
LEGUNE HEMATITE PROSPECT
A reconnaissance rock chip sampling program carried out by the TNG exploration team, resulted in the discovery of significant high-grade hematite iron mineralisation from an area known as the Legune Prospect (formerly ‘Ochre prospect’), 2km south of the Djibitgun Zn/Ag deposit (Figure 3). The discovery was made during routine systematic rock and soil sampling being carried out as part of TNG’s 2008 regional exploration programme at the Manbarrum Project targeting under-explored areas of its tenement portfolio.
The discovery – which features extensive outcropping hematite mineralisation with assays of over 60% Fe and corresponding low levels of phosphorus and silica (see Tables 1 and 2) – represents an attractive new exploration opportunity.
==> picture [239 x 219] intentionally omitted <==
Following agreement with the Traditional Owners, geological reconnaissance traversing, confirmed that the Legune Prospect comprises a low-lying hill with an extensive hematite cap. It is approximately 900 metres in length and 500 metres wide with an unknown depth extent. Two initial rock samples from the main outcrop returned the following assay results from laboratory XRF analysis:
==> picture [239 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Sample Fe SiO2 P
Description % % %
501691 61.3 5.73 0.016
PB01 67.1 2.29 0.015
----- End of picture text -----
Table 1: XRF Assay Results.
Further geological mapping and portable NITON XRF results confirmed that the iron content of the hematite extends over the entire area and that the outcrop forms part of a large hematite-rich zone. A cliff face on the side of the hill has revealed that the hematite appears continuous over at least a 6 metre vertical section (see photo 1). A 50m x 50m rock sample grid was placed over the entire area and samples submitted for assay. The laboratory results of these samples have confirmed and defined a significant high grade zone of 600m by 400m with potential for the mineralisation to extend beneath a silcrete cap to the west and east.
Negotiations have commenced with the Traditional Owners to gain access for drill testing of the prospect. The drill programme will be planned to test the thickness and depth extent of the hematite mineralisation.
The regional rock and soil programme is continuing.
Plate 1: Hematite outcrop, Legune prospect.
6
Annual Report 2008
==> picture [494 x 209] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Sample North East Niton Fe SiO2 Al2O3 P LOI
Fe % % % % 1000
OCH 0005 10 100 10 250 5.6 67.2 2.3 0.7 0.01 0.6
OCH 0017 9 940 10 200 62.1 66.2 3.1 0.9 0.01 0.9
OCH 0160 9 940 9 600 33.9 63.4 5.0 2.1 0.01 1.6
OCH 0140 9 980 9 700 32.7 62.6 6.5 0.9 0.04 1.6
OCH 0007 10 060 10 250 63.5 62.5 2.3 0.3 0.01 7.8
OCH 0008 10 040 10 250 61.8 62.4 3.2 0.9 0.02 6.2
OCH 0144 10 020 9 650 26.1 62.0 5.6 2.3 0.05 2.5
OCH 0156 9 860 9 600 24.0 62.0 4.0 1.7 0.13 4.0
OCH 0009 10 020 10 250 60.1 61.6 4.1 0.5 0.01 7.1
OCH 0022 10 040 10 200 49.7 59.4 8.7 0.5 0.01 5.6
OCH 0015 9 900 10 200 43.1 59.2 8.4 0.6 0.05 5.8
OCH 0061 10 060 10 050 25.0 58.7 6.1 1.7 0.02 2.3
----- End of picture text -----
Table 2: Highest XRF Assay results.
BROWNS ANd LANdANdI PROSPECTS
The Browns , and Landandi prospects were identified from historic surface geochemical soil and rock zinc-lead anomalies.
These prospects are significant as they have coincident IP, gravity and soil zinc anomalism. Interpretations of gravity and seismic data show that these overlie the prospective sandy dolomite in favourable structural settings.
These remain high priority targets for the Company and are considered to represent additional MVT-style base metal signatures.
OTHER TENEMENTS:
Carlton Shelf Project ELA 80/3816 : Zinc-Lead-Silver Burt Range Shelf Project ELA 80/3772: Zinc-Lead-Silver
Both of these projects were strategically selected in light of the broader base metal potential of the Bonaparte Basin and potential extensions of the Manbarrum Project. Granting of these Exploration Licences is anticipated in early 2009.
TNG has announced a potential significant new MagnetiteTitanium-Vanadium Prospect following preliminary test work of drill core from diamond hole ARD02. This was drilled by TNG’s former joint venture partner on a prominent magnetic feature for Nickel sulphides. The core was not previously cut or sampled.
Initial laboratory assays of the core gave the following results:
9.81% TiO2, 0.59% V2O5, 34.5% Fe (drill core from 34m depth)
8.90% TiO2, 0.55% V2O5, 31.2% Fe (surface drill spoil ARD02)
Following these encouraging results the remainder of the core was cut, sampled and submitted for assay and Davis Tube Recovery (DTR) test work, in order to determine the recovery of Iron (Fe), Vanadium Pentoxide (V205), and Titanium Oxide (TiO2) from magnetic concentrates.
Assay results from this latest work have confirmed that the mineralisation extends for at least 80m from a shallow depth of only 30m:
80m @ 28.7% Fe, 0.43% V2O5, 7.5% TiO2 from 31m.
MOUNT PEAKE:
Nickel, Magnetite -Vanadium-Titanium (TNG 100%)
The Mount Peake project comprises EL’s 23074, 23271 and is located in the Arunta Geological Province, 80 kilometres north east of Alice Springs (Figure 1). Airborne magnetic and electromagnetic surveys have indicated possible ultramafic intrusion hosted nickel targets.
Including:
38m @ 31.2% Fe, 0.49% V2O5, 8.6% TiO2 from 46m
10m @ 31.4% Fe, 0.50% V2O5, 9.13% TiO2 from 47m
Davis Tube Recovery (magnetic separation) results have given encouraging recoveries (Table 3) and assay of the recovered material has provided significant upgrades to an average of:
56% Fe, 17% TiO2, 1.2% V2O5
7
==> picture [596 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [495 x 132] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Sample ID Product Fe SiO2 TiO2 V2O5 LOI Davis Tube Recovery
Weight
Mass Fe TiO2 V2O5
gms % % % % % % % % %
MP 1012 DTR 32.01 50.39 6.70 14.67 1.096 -1.87 33.99 56.43 53.73 76.96
MP 1022 DTR 59.86 55.27 2.16 17.13 1.144 -3.93 42.26 68.64 71.68 86.56
MP 1036 DTR 45.91 54.74 2.67 16.35 1.157 -3.53 35.24 60.75 65.19 81.56
MP 1076 DTR 40.97 55.50 2.47 16.01 1.148 -4.03 28.89 51.86 67.14 80.71
MP 1105 DTR 19.50 56.15 2.73 13.84 1.216 -3.39 14.09 33.25 51.46 81.99
----- End of picture text -----
Table 3: Davis Tube Recovery results from selected samples of ARD02 drill core.
It is important to note that these results are from a single drill hole into a very large cohesive magnetic anomaly. The drill hole logging and support from assay results shows that the magnetite mineralisation occurs over 100m in vertical thickness. The magnetic anomaly is several kilometres in strike with a second historic drill hole also recording magnetite – gabbro in the drill log gives encouragment to the continuation of the mineralisation. In width the anomaly varies from 0.5km to 1km.
During July a detailed gravity survey was also completed over the Mt Peake magnetic anomaly area in order to provide additional data prior to further drilling. Interpretation of the data has revealed a significant gravity anomaly immediately adjacent to the east of the main Mt Peake magnetic anomaly with a further large gravity anomaly extending 1km to the NE, with no coincident magnetic anomaly. Hematite mineralisation does not have a magnetic signature but does have a positive gravity signature.
These results and dimensions of the geophysical signature show that the project has the potential to develop as a significant new exploration target for the Company. In addition, the Project is strategically located close to existing infrastructure including the Alice Springs to Darwin Railway and Stuart Highway, 60km to the east, and the new LNG pipeline just 20km to the east.
TNG will proceed to further evaluate the potential of this area to host both Ferro-vanadium-titanium and hematite mineralisation. A drill programme is currently in preparation and subject to clearance authorisations and drill rig availability is planned to commence in October 2008.
NORTHERN TERRITORY JOINT VENTURE PROJECTS
TNG 100%, WDR earning 51%
TNG holds several projects in the Northern Territory which are at various stages of exploration and are the subject of a Joint Venture Agreement with Western Desert Resources Ltd (“WDR”).
WDR has planned two diamond drill holes on Explorer EL 24471 to target a classical Tennant Creek style magnetic anomaly which will be tested at depth for gold and copper mineralisation.
In addition WDR is progressing with preparations for exploration at ELA 25581. This licence is adjacent to the Rover 1 project where there has been recently reported significant intersections including 65.75m at 11.0 g/t Au, 0.75% Cu and 0.09% Co. Rover 1 is located close to the northwest corner of ELA 25581 and is included in the Rover joint venture with TNG Ltd. Negotiations are currently at an advanced stage with the Traditional Owners of the land for access to this exploration licence. There are a number of high-priority targets within the tenement which have the potential to contain similar mineralisation to that found at Rover 1.
WESTERN AUSTRALIAN JOINT VENTURE PROJECTS
McTavish Joint Venture:
TNG 30%, Barminco 70%
TNG holds an interest in other tenement groups, however, in each case, the Company does not contribute towards exploration expenditure as the projects are subject to joint venture or options for sale. These projects include McTavish project.
Barminco have advised that work over the next reporting period is expected to focus on exploratory activities. As tenements M40/77, 119 and 157 are no longer under plaint more in depth exploration, specifically of tenements P40/1001, 1002, is considered viable.
8
Annual Report 2008
==> picture [239 x 372] intentionally omitted <==
Figure4: Magnetic image of Mt Peake anomaly.
Kintore East Joint Venture:
TNG 23.95%, Mines and Resources Australia Ltd 76.05%
The reversion of the mining leases occurred in mid April 2008 and has lead to the granting of tenements P16/2370 – P16/2374.
MRA have advised that a compilation and review of all historical data will be completed followed by target generation and ranking prior to drilling scheduled for early 2009.
A heritage survey has been planned and will take place in the next quarter. The project area is covered by a single Native Title claim held by the Widji People.
==> picture [239 x 372] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 5: Gravity image of Mt Peake gravity anomaly.
Cawse Extended Joint Venture
(80% Norilsk Nickel/20% TNG)
Norilsk Nickel Cawse Ltd. (Norilsk) owns and manages the Cawse Nickel-Cobalt operation near Kalgoorlie in Western Australia, with Norilsk and TNG jointly owning the adjacent Cawse Extended Project. TNG’s interest is 20%, freecarried to production, convertible at TNG’s election to a 2% net smelter return.
Four main types of mineralisation have been identified at Cawse. These are the oxide ores of limonite, talc, and siliceous cobalt and the smectite-saprolite ore (locally termed nontronite).
The commercial success of the Cawse nickel operation is dependent in part upon the ability of the principal ore type to be beneficiated. A simple process of rejecting lower grade material on the basis of particle size achieves this. This process, which is called upgrading, enables sub-grade material to become commercial ore grade and also enables higher ore grades to be processed in the early parts of
9
==> picture [596 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
the operation. The success of the upgrade process is dependent upon the physical and chemical properties of the ore being processed and the nickel grade of the ore.
The upgrade ore type represents >80% of the Cawse nickel resource and is hosted mostly within a limonite unit, represented by goethitic clays in the upper saprolite zone.
The ore is crushed and slurried in the upgrade processing circuit. It is then passed over a series of screens that remove all material over 0.5mm. This ensures that coarse material is removed from the main ore stream. The upgrading process is reliant on selectively rejecting lower grade or barren material, which can include silica, magnesite and relict saprock.
The Company has held meetings with Norilsk on the future project plans. An update on the resource and commencement of mining is awaited from Norilsk.
Traditional owner policy
INdIGENOUS RELATIONS POLICY
TNG recognises the traditional attachment and customary requirements and preservation of culture and customs by Indigenous people in relation to land.
It is our desire to develop long term relationships with Indigenous people and communities where we conduct exploration and mine development and operations. We will do this by:
-
Working closely with Indigenous people and communities on developing appropriate communication protocols
-
Establishing structured processes for consultation and negotiation and ongoing relationships
-
Respecting Indigenous people’s values and beliefs
-
Ensuring culture awareness programs within our company are undertaken and maintained
-
Supporting programs that strengthen and promote the interests of Indigenous people
-
Increasing involvement of local Indigenous people in the success of our business and
-
Identifying and acting upon opportunities for training and employment for local Indigenous people.
==> picture [239 x 230] intentionally omitted <==
Left to Right : Jimmy Paddy, Teddy Carlton, Maurice Simon, Patrick Bitting.
Corporate activities
PLACEMENT ANd UNdERWRITING
distributions of shares in investments
Shareholders approved the distribution of shares held in WDR received in return for the sale of WDR of some non-core tenements in the Northern Territory, at a general meeting of shareholders held in September 2007. The 10 million WDR shares were distributed in the ratio of 1 WDR share for every 18.22 TNG shares.
TNG also completed the distribution of securities held in Batavia Mining Ltd and Thor Mining PLC. This was approved by shareholders in 2007.
SALE OF NICKEL ASSETS
In 2007 the Directors announced their intention that TNG’s nickel assets, primarily being the Cawse Extended Project and Mount Peake Project, form the basis of a new company, to be listed on the ASX via an IPO.
The Board proposed, subject to obtaining the required approvals, to distribute shares in this company to the shareholders of TNG.
TNG sought a determination from the Australian Tax Office (ATO) in respect to this matter. Unfortunately, TNG is currently still awaiting the relevant clearance and the matter cannot be progressed further until it is received.
10
Annual Report 2008
SHAREHOLdER MEETINGS
AGM
The Annual General Meeting was held on Thursday, 7 November 2007.
A further General Meeting of shareholders was held on 11 August 2008 to consider:
-
Authorise execution of Underwriting Agreement
-
Authorise Directors to sub-underwrite Rights Issue
-
Approve placement facility
-
Appoint Mr Paul Burton as Director
SHARE CAPITAL
Placement
The Company successfully raised $5m via a placement of shares at $0.55 to sophisticated investors.
Rights issue
In August 2008 an underwritten non-renounceable pro rata offer of shares was made to shareholders.
The pro rata offer was based on 1 share for every 4 shares held at an issue price of $0.06. A total of 48,170,834 shares raising $2,890,250 were issued.
- Section 195 approval.
Subsequent placement
davis Samuel
TNG is a party to proceedings instituted by the Commonwealth of Australia (Commonwealth) in the Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory in which the Commonwealth claims that it is entitled to a constructive trust over shares held by TNG in Kanowna Lights NL (now Peninsula Minerals Limited). The Commonwealth has claimed that as constructive trustee, TNG is liable to account for the highest market value at which the shares could have been sold and interest on that market value.
The Commonwealth claims that it is entitled to an amount of $2,146,687.29 representing a claim of $1,274,400 for the value of the Kanowna Lights NL shares and interest thereon since early 2000.
TNG has issued cross-claims against several parties in the proceedings.
TNG is vigorously defending the Commonwealth claims. It is not possible to predict the likely outcome of the matter or the timing of an outcome.
Due to strong demand for the shortfall from the rights issue the Company completed a private placement on the 1 September 2008. A total of 17,200,934 shares raising $1,032,056 were issued at $0.06.
OPES PRIME MATTER
In April 2008 TNG was informed by the Receiver and Manager on behalf of Opes Prime that approximately 16.5 million shares in TNG were the subject of agreements between Opes Prime and its customers.
No Directors held shares in TNG through an account with Opes Prime.
Subsequently a substantial shareholders notice was lodged, and in May 2008 a cessation substantial holding was lodged.
In July 2008, in accordance with its share registry records it became apparent that a majority of these shares had been sold.
Any adverse finding made against TNG which cannot be successfully recovered from cross claims made against other parties may result in TNG being liable to pay up to the amount claimed by the Commonwealth. TNG may also be liable for costs of the proceedings if awarded against it, as well as its own legal costs.
The hearing of the court proceedings commenced in June 2008, and is currently ongoing.
11
==> picture [596 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
Corporate Governance Statement
The Board of Directors of TNG Ltd (the “Company”) is responsible for the corporate governance of the Company. The Board guides and monitors the business and affairs of the Company on behalf of the shareholders by whom they are elected and to whom they are accountable.
Since the introduction of the ASX Principles of Good Corporate Governance and Best Practice Recommendations (“ASX Guidelines”), the Company has made it a priority to adopt systems of control and accountability as the basis for the administration of corporate governance. Some of these policies and procedures are summarised in this report. Commensurate with the spirit of the ASX Guidelines, the Company has followed each Recommendation where the Board has considered the Recommendation to be appropriate. Where, after due consideration, the Company’s corporate governance practices depart from the Recommendations, the Board has offered full disclosure of the nature of, and reason for, the adoption of its own practice.
The table on the next page summarises the Company’s compliance with the Corporate Governance Council’s Recommendations.
The Company’s corporate governance practices were in place throughout the year ended 30 June 2008. Further information about the Company’s corporate governance practices is set out on the Company’s website at www.tngltd.com.au . In accordance with the recommendations of the ASX, information published on the Company’s website includes charters (for the Board and its sub-committees), codes of conduct and other policies and procedures relating to the Board and its responsibilities.
12
Annual Report 2008
==> picture [496 x 677] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Recommendation Comply Reference /
Yes / No Explanation
1.1 Formalise and disclose the functions reserved to the Board and those delegated to management. Yes Page 14
2.1 A majority of the Board should be independent Directors. No Page 14
2.2 The chairperson should be an independent Director. No Page 14
2.3 The roles of Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer should not be exercised by the same Yes Page 14
individual.
2.4 The Board should establish a nomination committee. No Page 14
3.1 Establish a code of conduct to guide the Directors, the Chief Executive Officer (or equivalent), the
Chief Financial Officer (or equivalent) and any other key executives as to:
• the practices necessary to maintain confidence in the Company’s integrity; Yes Page 15
• the responsibility and accountability of individuals for reporting and investigating reports of
unethical practices.
3.2 Disclose the policy concerning trading in Company securities by Directors, officers and Yes Page 16
employees.
4.1 Require the Chief Executive Officer (or equivalent) and Chief Financial Officer (or equivalent) to Yes Page 17
state in writing to the Board that the Company’s financial reports present a true and fair view,
in all material respects, of the Company’s financial condition and operating results and are in
accordance with the relevant accounting standards.
4.2 The Board should establish an audit committee. Yes Page 15
4.3 Structure the audit committee so that it consists of:
• only non-executive Directors;
• a majority of independent Directors; No Page 15
• an independent Chairperson, who is not Chairperson of the Board;
• at least three members.
4.4 The audit committee should have a formal charter. Yes Website
5.1 Establish written policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance with ASX Listing Rule Yes Website
disclosure requirements and to ensure accountability at a senior management level for that
compliance.
6.1 Design and disclose a communications strategy to promote effective communications with Yes Website
shareholders and encourage effective participation at general meetings.
6.2 Request the external auditor to attend the annual general meeting and be available to answer Yes Page 17
shareholder questions about the conduct of the audit and the preparation and content of the
auditor’s report.
7.1 The Board or appropriate Board committee should establish policies on risk oversight and Yes Page 17
management.
7.2 The Chief Executive Officer (or equivalent) and Chief Financial Officer (or equivalent) should state
to the Board in writing that:
• the statement given in accordance with best practice recommendation 4.1 (the integrity
of financial statements) is founded on a sound system of risk management and internal Yes Page 17
compliance and control which implements the policies adopted by the Board;
• the Company’s risk management and internal compliance and control system is operating
efficiently and effectively in all material respects.
8.1 Disclose the process for performance evaluation of the Board, its committees and individual No Page 14
directors, and key executives.
9.1 Provide disclosure in relation to the Company’s remuneration policies to enable investors to Yes Page 18
understand (i) the costs and benefits of those policies and (ii) the link between remuneration paid
to directors and key executives and corporate performance.
9.2 The Board should establish a remuneration committee. No Page 17
9.3 Clearly distinguish the structure of non-executive Directors’ remuneration from that of executives. Yes Page 18
9.4 Ensure that payment of equity based executive remuneration is made in accordance with Yes Page 18
thresholds set in plans approved by shareholders.
10.1 Establish and disclose a code of conduct to guide compliance with legal and other obligations to Yes Page 19
legitimate stakeholders.
----- End of picture text -----
13
==> picture [596 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
BOARd OF dIRECTORS
Role of the Board and management
The Board’s primary role is the protection and enhancement of medium to long term shareholder value. To fulfil this role, the Board is responsible for the overall Corporate Governance of the consolidated entity including its strategic direction, establishing goals for management and monitoring the achievement of these goals. The Managing Director is responsible to the Board for the day to day management of the Company.
The Board has sole responsibility for the following:
-
Appointing and removing the Managing Director and any other executive Director and approving their remuneration;
-
Appointing and removing the Company Secretary and approving their remuneration;
-
Determining the strategic direction of the Company and measuring performance of management against approved strategies;
-
Reviewing the adequacy of resources for management to properly carry out approved strategies and business plans;
-
Adopting operating and capital expenditure budgets at the commencement of each financial year and monitoring the progress by both financial and nonfinancial key performance indicators;
-
Monitoring the Company’s medium term capital and cash flow requirements;
-
Approving and monitoring financial and other reporting to regulatory bodies, shareholders and other organisations;
-
Determining that satisfactory arrangements are in place
-
for auditing the Company’s financial affairs;
-
Reviewing and ratifying systems of risk management and internal compliance and control, codes of conduct and compliance with legislative requirements; and
-
Ensuring that policies and compliance systems consistent with the Company’s objectives and best practice are in place and that the Company and its officers act legally, ethically and responsibly on all matters.
The Board’s role and the Company’s corporate governance practices are being continually reviewed and improved as the Company’s business develops.
Composition of the Board and new appointments
The Company currently has the following Board members:
| Mr John W Barr | Chairman |
|---|---|
| Mr Neil Biddle | Managing Director |
| Mr Terence Smith | Non-Executive Director |
| Mr Michael Bowen | Non-Executive Director |
| Mr Edward Fry | Non-Executive Director |
| Mr Paul Burton | Exploration Director |
The Company’s Constitution provides that the number of Directors shall not be less than three and not more than ten. There is no requirement for any share holding qualification.
The Board considers that Mr Terence N Smith is an Independent Director in accordance with Recommendation 2.1. Whilst the remainder of the Board are not independent, the Board believes that all the individuals on the Board can make, and do make, quality and independent judgements in the best interests of the Company and possess the skills and experience suitable for building the Company. Directors having a conflict of interest in relation to a particular item of business must absent themselves from the Board meeting before commencement of discussion on the topic.
The Board considers that its structure has been, and continues to be, appropriate in the context of the Company’s history and the size and scale of operations. As the Company’s activities increase in size, nature and scope, the size of the Board will be reviewed and the optimum number of Directors required for the Board to properly perform its responsibilities and functions assigned.
The membership of the Board, its activities and composition is subject to periodic review. The criteria for determining the identification and appointment of a suitable candidate for the Board shall include quality of the individual, background of experience and achievement, compatibility with other Board members, credibility within the Company’s scope of activities, intellectual ability to contribute to Board duties and physical ability to undertake Board duties and responsibilities.
Directors are initially appointed by the full Board subject to election by shareholders at the next annual general meeting. Under the Company’s Constitution the tenure of Directors (other than Managing Director) is subject to reappointment by shareholders not later than the third anniversary following his last appointment. Subject to the requirements of the Corporations Act 2001, the Board does not subscribe to the principle of retirement
14
Annual Report 2008
age and there is no maximum period of service as a Director.
A Managing Director may be appointed for any period and on any terms the Directors think fit and, subject to the terms of any agreement entered into, the Board may revoke any appointment.
Ethical standards
The Board acknowledges the need for continued maintenance of the highest standard of corporate governance practice and ethical conduct by all Directors and employees of the Company.
Code of Conduct for directors
Committees of the Board
To assist the Board in carrying out its responsibilities, the Board has established the following committees:
- Audit Committee
The Audit Committee operates under a charter approved by the Board. It is the Board’s responsibility to ensure that an effective internal control framework exists within the entity. This includes internal controls to deal with both the effectiveness and efficiency of significant business processes, the safeguarding of assets, the maintenance of proper accounting records, and the reliability of financial information as well as non-financial considerations.
The Committee also provides the Board with additional assurance regarding the reliability of financial information for inclusion in the financial reports.
The Full Board were members of the Audit Committee.
Qualifications of audit committee members
For details of the qualifications of the audit committee members, the number of Audit Committee meetings held during the year and the attendees at those meetings, refer to the Directors’ Report.
Conflicts of interest
In accordance with the Corporations Act 2001 and the Company’s Constitution, Directors must keep the Board advised, on an ongoing basis, of any interest that could potentially conflict with those of the Company. Where the Board believes that a significant conflict exists the Director concerned is not present at the meeting whilst the item is considered.
Independent professional advice
The Board has determined that individual Directors have the right in connection with their duties and responsibilities as Directors, to seek independent professional advice at the Company’s expense. The engagement of an outside adviser is subject to prior approval of the Chairman and this will not be withheld unreasonably. If appropriate, any advice so received will be made available to all Board members.
The Board has adopted a Code of Conduct for Directors to promote ethical and responsible decision-making by the Directors. The code is based on a code of conduct for Directors prepared by the Australian Institute of Company Directors.
The principles of the code are:
-
A Director must act honestly, in good faith and in the best interests of the Company as a whole.
-
A Director has a duty to use due care and diligence in fulfilling the functions of office and exercising the powers attached to that office.
-
A Director must use the powers of office for a proper purpose, in the best interests of the Company as a whole.
-
A Director must recognise that the primary responsibility is to the Company’s shareholders as a whole but should, where appropriate, have regard for the interest of all stakeholders of the Company.
-
A Director must not make improper use of information acquired as a Director.
-
A Director must not take improper advantage of the position of Director.
-
A Director must not allow personal interests, or the interests of any associated person, to conflict with the interests of the Company.
-
A Director has an obligation to be independent in judgment and actions and to take all reasonable steps to be satisfied as to the soundness of all decisions taken as a Board.
-
Confidential information received by a Director in the course of the exercise of directorial duties remains the property of the Company and it is improper to disclose it, or allow it to be disclosed, unless that disclosure has been authorised by the Company, or the person from whom the information is provided, or is required by law.
-
A Director should not engage in conduct likely to bring discredit upon the Company.
-
A Director has an obligation at all times, to comply with the spirit, as well as the letter of the law and with the principles of the Code.
15
==> picture [596 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
The principles are supported by guidelines as set out by the Australian Institute of Company Directors for their interpretation. Directors are also obliged to comply with the Company’s Code of Ethics and Conduct, as outlined below.
Code of Ethics and Conduct
The Company has implemented a Code of Ethics and Conduct, which provides guidelines aimed at maintaining high ethical standards, corporate behaviour and accountability within the Company.
All employees and Directors are expected to:
-
respect the law and act in accordance with it;
-
respect confidentiality and not misuse Company information, assets or facilities;
-
value and maintain professionalism;
-
avoid real or perceived conflicts of interest;
-
act in the best interests of shareholders;
-
by their actions contribute to the Company’s reputation as a good corporate citizen which seeks the respect of the community and environment in which it operates;
-
perform their duties in ways that minimise environmental impacts and maximise workplace safety;
-
exercise fairness, courtesy, respect, consideration and sensitivity in all dealings within their workplace and with customers, suppliers and the public generally; and
-
act with honesty, integrity, decency and responsibility at all times.
An employee that breaches the Code of Ethics and Conduct may face disciplinary action. If an employee suspects that a breach of the Code of Ethics and Conduct has occurred or will occur, he or she must report that breach to management. No employee will be disadvantaged or prejudiced if he or she reports in good faith a suspected breach. All reports will be acted upon and kept confidential.
dealings in Company securities
The Company’s share trading policy imposes basic trading restrictions on all employees of the Company with ‘inside information’, and additional trading restrictions on the Directors, Officers, Employees and Consultants of the Company.
‘Inside information’ is information that:
-
is not generally available; and
-
if it were generally available, it would, or would be likely to influence investors in deciding whether to buy or sell the Company’s securities.
If an employee possesses inside information, the person must not:
-
trade in the Company’s securities;
-
advise others or procure others to trade in the Company’s securities; or
-
pass on the inside information to others – including colleagues, family or friends – knowing (or where the employee or Director should have reasonably known) that the other persons will use that information to trade in, or procure someone else to trade in, the Company’s securities.
This prohibition applies regardless of how the employee or Director learns the information (eg. even if the employee or Director overhears it or is told in a social setting).
In addition to the above, Directors must notify the Company Secretary as soon as practicable, but not later than 5 business days, after they have bought or sold the Company’s securities or exercised options. In accordance with the provisions of the Corporations Act and the Listing rules of the ASX, the Company on behalf of the Directors must advise the ASX of any transactions conducted by them in the securities of the Company.
Breaches of this policy will be subject to disciplinary action, which may include termination of employment.
Interests of other stakeholders
The Company’s objective is to develop and commercialise its exploration tenements to create wealth for shareholders and add value for other stakeholders.
To assist in meeting its objective, the Company conducts its business within the Code of Ethics and Conduct, as outlined in 2.2 above.
dISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION
Continuous disclosure to ASX
The continuous disclosure policy requires all executives and Directors to inform the Chairman, Managing Director or the Company Secretary, of any potentially material information as soon as practicable after they become aware of that information.
Information is material if it is likely that the information would influence investors who commonly acquire securities on ASX in deciding whether to buy, sell or hold the Company’s securities.
Information is not material and need not be disclosed if:
- (i) A reasonable person would not expect the information to be disclosed or is material but due to a specific valid commercial reason is not to be disclosed; and
16
Annual Report 2008
- (ii) The information is confidential; and
RISK MANAGEMENT
-
(iii) One of the following applies:
-
(a) It would breach a law or regulation to disclose the information;
-
(b) The information concerns an incomplete proposal or negotiation;
-
(c) The information comprises matters of supposition or is insufficiently definite to warrant disclosure;
-
(d) The information is generated for internal management purposes;
-
(e) The information is a trade secret;
-
(f) It would breach a material term of an agreement, to which the Company is a party, to disclose the information;
-
(g) The information is data that the release of which may benefit the Company’s potential competitors.
The Chairman and Managing Director are responsible for interpreting and monitoring the Company’s disclosure policy and where necessary informing the Board. The Company Secretary is responsible for all communications with ASX.
Identification of risk
The Board is responsible for the oversight of the Company’s risk management and control framework. Responsibility for control and risk management is delegated to the appropriate level of management within the Company with the Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer (or equivalent) having ultimate responsibility to the Board for the risk management and control framework.
Areas of significant business risk to the Company are highlighted in the Key Risk Analysis presented to the Board each year.
Arrangements put in place by the Board to monitor risk management include:
-
regular reporting to the Board in respect of operations and the financial position of the Company; and
-
reports to the Board by the Chairman of each committee at the next Board meeting following the Committee meeting.
Integrity of financial reporting
Communication with Shareholders
The Company places considerable importance on effective communications with shareholders.
The Company’s communication strategy requires communication with shareholders and other stakeholders in an open, regular and timely manner so that the market has sufficient information to make informed investment decisions on the operations and results of the Company. The strategy provides for the use of systems that ensure a regular and timely release of information about the Company is provided to shareholders. Mechanisms employed include:
-
Announcements lodged with ASX;
-
ASX Quarterly Cash Flow Reports;
-
Half Yearly Report;
-
Presentations at the Annual General Meeting/General Meetings; and
-
Annual Report.
The Board encourages full participation of shareholders at the Annual General Meeting to ensure a high level of accountability and understanding of the Company’s strategy and goals.
The Company also posts all reports, ASX and media releases and copies of significant business presentations on the Company’s website.
The Company’s Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer (or equivalent) report in writing to the Board that:
-
the consolidated financial statements of the Company and its controlled entity for each half and full year present a true and fair view, in all material aspects, of the Company’s financial condition and operational results and are in accordance with accounting standards;
-
the above statement is founded on a sound system of risk management and internal compliance and control which implements the policies adopted by the Board; and
-
the Company’s risk management and internal compliance and control framework is operating efficiently and effectively in all material respects.
Role of auditor
The Company’s practice is to invite the auditor to attend the Annual General Meeting and be available to answer shareholder questions about the conduct of the audit and the preparation and content of the auditor’s report.
Remuneration arrangements
The Board has not established a Remuneration Committee responsible for making recommendations to the Board on remuneration arrangements for Directors and executives of the Company.
17
==> picture [596 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
All of the Directors receive a separate Directors’ fee of $40,000 per annum, plus statutory superannuation.
In addition:
- Kensington Consulting Pty Ltd of which Mr John W Barr is a Director, receives a consulting fee for Mr Barr’s services under a service agreement approved at the 2007 Annual General Meeting;
Compliance with ASX Corporate Governance Recommendations
During the Company’s 2007/2008 financial year, the Company complied with the ASX Principles and Recommendations other than in relation to the matters specified on the next page.
-
Hatched Creek Pty Ltd of which Mr Neil G Biddle is a Director, receives consulting fees for Mr Biddle’s services under a service agreement approved at the 2007 Annual General Meeting; and
-
Hardy Bowen, of which Mr Michael P Bowen is a Partner, receives legal fees for services provided; and
-
Gimbulki Services of which Mr Edward J Fry is the sole proprietor, receives consulting fees for Mr Fry’s services.
-
Mr Paul E Burton is also a direct employee of the Company on a standard employment contract.
The service agreement for Kensington Consulting Pty Ltd and Hatched Creek Pty Ltd have been approved by shareholders and contain a termination clause of a maximum of 12 months ($300,000).
There is no direct link between remuneration paid to any of the Directors and corporate performance such as bonus payments for achievements of key performance indicators.
Remuneration of Directors and key executives is competitively set with the assistance of externally prepared surveys and reports, taking into account the experience and qualifications of each individual.
The aggregate amount payable to the Company’s non-executive Directors for undertaking their duties as Directors must not exceed the maximum annual amount approved by the Company’s shareholders (currently $300,000).
For a full discussion of the Company’s remuneration philosophy and framework, and the remuneration received by directors and executives in the current period, please refer to the Remuneration Report, which is contained within the Directors’ Report.
18
Annual Report 2008
==> picture [494 x 666] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Principle Recommendation Notification of Departure Explanation for Departure
Reference Reference
2 2.1 The Board does not The Board considers that Mr Terence N Smith
comprise a majority of is an Independent Director in accordance with
independent Directors Recommendation 2.1. Whilst the remainder of the Board
are not independent, the Board believes that all the
individuals on the Board can make, and do make, quality
and independent judgements in the best interests of the
Company and possess the skills and experience suitable
for building the Company. Directors having a conflict of
interest in relation to a particular item of business must
absent themselves from the Board meeting before
commencement of discussion on the topic.
2 2.2 The Chairman is not an Mr John W Barr is the Chairman and is not considered
independent Director. to be independent in respect of the ASX Corporate
Governance Council’s definition of independence.
The Board considers that the expertise and dedication
of Mr John W Barr gives constructiveness and
organisation to the Board and its functions.
2 2.4 The Board has not The full Board carries out the role of a Nomination
established a separate Committee in accordance with its Charter (which
Nomination Committee. is disclosed on the Company’s website). The Board
considers that at this stage, no efficiencies or other
benefits would be gained by establishing a separate
Nomination Committee.
4 4.3 The Audit Committee The role of the Audit Committee is carried out by the full
does not comprise a Board. Only one member is an independent Director.
majority of independent The Board considers that given the financial expertise of
Directors. the members of the Audit Committee, the Company is
well serviced by their expertise.
8 8.1 Non-disclosure of the The process for evaluation of the Board, individual
process of evaluating Directors and key executives was not disclosed.
the Board. However, an evaluation of the Board, Directors and
key executives does occur on an informal basis by the
Chairman at least annually.
9 9.2 The Board has not The full Board carries out the role of a Remuneration
established a separate Committee in accordance with its Charter (which is
Remuneration disclosed on the Company’s website). Due to the
Committee. relatively small size of the Board, the Board considers
that a separate Remuneration Committee would not
add efficiency to the process of determining the level
of remuneration for the directors and key executives.
When considering matters of remuneration, the
Board functions in accordance with the Remuneration
Committee Charter which requires that shareholders
approve the maximum aggregate remuneration for
non-executive Directors (after the Board recommends
the actual payments to directors) and that executive
remuneration and other terms of employment are
reviewed annually by the remuneration committee having
regard to performance, relevant comparative information
and expert advice.
----- End of picture text -----
19
==> picture [596 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
Directors’ Report
The Directors present their report together with the financial report of TNG Limited (the Company) and of the Group, being the Company and subsidiaries, and the Group’s interest in a jointly controlled entity for the financial year ended 30 June 2008 and the auditors report thereon.
Directors
The Directors of the Company at any time during or since the end of the financial year are:
John W Barr, CA, FAICd Chairman and Company Secretary
Mr John W Barr was appointed in 1998. He has extensive Australian and international experience with exposure to manufacturing, mining and mineral exploration and development.
Mr Barr has managed his own consultancy business since 1987 which specialises in the management of public companies including advice on capital raisings, mergers and acquisitions, negotiating onshore and offshore acquisitions and joint ventures, negotiating commodity based funding, and compliance with corporate and stock exchange requirements.
During the last four years Mr Barr has served as a Director of the following listed companies:
-
Batavia Mining Limited (2003 to 2005, April 2008 to current); and
-
Thor Mining PLC (2005 to 2008).
Mr John W Barr was appointed Company Secretary on the 30 May 2008.
Neil G Biddle, B.App.Sc(Geology), M.Aus.IMM
Managing Director
Mr Neil G Biddle was appointed in 1998. He has over 18 years professional and management experience in listed public companies involved in mining and exploration. During the last four years Mr Biddle has served as a Director of Batavia Mining Limited since 2005 and previously from 2003 to 2004.
Paul Burton, B.Sc (Hons) Geology (UK), M.Sc Mineral Exploration (Canada), MAusImm, FAEG, MAICd Exploration Director
Mr Paul Burton is an Exploration Geologist/Geochemist with over 20 years experience in Exploration and Mining.
Mr Burton is experienced in running successful exploration programs for a variety of commodities. He has held consulting and senior management roles with major exploration companies including.
Mr Burton has held no other directorships.
Mr Burton was appointed as an Executive Director on the 11 August 2008.
Michael P Bowen, B.Juris, LLB, B.Com
Non-Executive Director
Mr Michael P Bowen was appointed in 2004. Mr Bowen is a partner of the law firm Hardy Bowen, practising primarily corporate, and securities, commercial and mining law.
During the last four years Mr Bowen has served as a director of the following listed companies:
-
IMF (Australia) Ltd since 2001;
-
Medical Corporation Australasia Limited since 2004;
-
Vietnam Industrial Investments Limited since 2004.
20
Annual Report 2008
Edward J Fry
Non-Executive Director
Mr Edward J Fry was appointed in 2006. Mr Fry is the proprietor of a Land Access/Management consulting company primarily focusing on Native Title and Exploration and Mine Development Agreements. His past experience includes various positions in the Australian Resources sector including Corporate Officer – Native Title and Investor Relations analyst for Normandy Mining Ltd, Senior Officer for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission and Aboriginal Development Commission. Mr Fry has held no other directorships.
Terence N Smith, dip.Bus, Grad.Cert.Bus
Non-Executive Director
Mr Terence N Smith was appointed in 2004. He was one of the founding partners of the Smith Coffey Group which has provided taxation, accounting and financial advice to clients in Perth for over 34 years prior to his retirement. He has a wide range of business skills in the areas of financial planning and corporate management. Mr Smith holds directorships in a number of companies in the wine industry.
PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES
The principal activities of the Group during the course of the financial year were the significant exploration of its Manbarrum Project; the review of advanced exploration projects for acquisition; the management of its other exploration properties and management of its interest in the Cawse Extended Project.
There were no other significant changes in the nature of the activities of the Group during the year.
REVIEW ANd RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The operating loss of the Group after income tax for the year was $2,421,829 (2007:loss $5,652,091).
A review of the operations during the financial year is set out on pages 2 to 11.
dIVIdENdS
No dividends were paid during the year and the Directors do not recommend payment of a dividend.
Mr Smith has served on the Board of Batavia Mining Limited since 2005.
damian P delaney
Chief Financial Officer and Company Secretary
Mr Delaney resigned as CFO and Company Secretary on 30 May 2008.
dIRECTORS’ MEETINGS
The number of Directors’ meetings and number of meetings attended by each of the Directors of the Company during the financial year are:
==> picture [495 x 136] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Number of board Number of audit
meetings held during Number of meetings held during Number of
the time the Director board meetings the time the Director audit meetings
Director held office attended held office attended
John W Barr 8 7 2 2
Neil G Biddle 8 8 2 -
Paul E Burton - - - -
Michael P Bowen 8 8 2 2
Edward J Fry 8 8 2 2
Terence N Smith 8 8 2 2
----- End of picture text -----
21
==> picture [596 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
REMUNERATION REPORT - AUdITEd
1. Principles of remuneration - audited
This report details the amount and nature of remuneration of each director of the Company and the executives receiving the highest remuneration.
Key management personnel have authority and responsibility for planning and controlling the activities of the Company and the Group, including Directors of the Company and other executives. Key management personnel comprise of the S300A directors of the Company and the Group including the five most highly remunerated Company and the Group executives.
Remuneration Policy – audited
The remuneration policy is to provide a fixed remuneration component and a specific equity related component. The Board believes that this remuneration policy is appropriate given the stage of development of the Company and the activities which it undertakes and is appropriate in aligning director and executive objectives with shareholder and business objectives.
The remuneration policy, setting the terms and conditions for the executive Directors and other executives has been developed by the Board after seeking professional advice and taking into account market conditions and comparable salary levels for companies of a similar size and operating in similar sectors.
Executive and non executive Directors receive a base fee of $40,000 per annum. Shareholders have approved Directors fees of an amount of up to $300,000 cash in aggregate per annum. Superannuation contributions of 9% are paid on these fees as required by law.
Directors and executives receive either a salary plus superannuation guarantee contributions as required by law, currently set at 9%, or provide their services via a consultancy arrangement. Directors and executives do not receive any retirement benefits except as stated. Individuals may, however, choose to sacrifice part of their salary to increase payments towards superannuation.
All remuneration paid to Directors and executives is valued at cost to the Company and expensed. Options are valued using the Black-Scholes methodology.
The Board policy is to remunerate non-executive Directors at market rates for comparable companies for time, commitment and responsibilities. The Board performing the role of the Remuneration Committee determines payments to the non-executive Directors and reviews their remuneration annually, based on market practice, duties and accountability. Independent external advice is sought when required. The maximum aggregate amount of fees that can be paid to Directors is subject to approval by shareholders at a General Meeting. Fees for non-executive Directors are not linked to the performance of the economic entity. However, to align Directors’ interests with shareholder interests, the Directors are encouraged to hold shares in the Company and may receive options.
There is no policy currently in place for the KMP to limit their exposure to risk in relation to the shares held and share options granted as part of their remuneration
Service Contracts
John W Barr - Chairman and Company Secretary
-
Term of Agreement – 1998 until terminated by either party
-
Salary - $40,000 per annum excluding super plus any expense incurred
-
Additional monies are paid to Kensington Consulting Pty Ltd for consulting services
Neil G Biddle - Managing Director
-
Term of Agreement – 1998 until terminated by either party
-
Salary - $40,000 per annum excluding super plus any expense incurred
-
Additional monies are paid to Hatched Creek Pty Ltd for consulting services
Paul E Burton - Exploration Director
-
Term of Agreement – 22 January 2007 until terminated by either party. Appointed executive Director 11 August 2008
-
Salary - $180,000 per annum excluding super plus any expense incurred
-
Early Termination – 6 months written notice or making a payment of 6 months salary in lieu. This applies to any reason other than gross misconduct
22
Annual Report 2008
Michael P Bowen - Non-Executive Director
-
Term of Agreement – 2004 until terminated by either party
-
Salary - $40,000 per annum excluding super plus any expense incurred
-
Additional monies are to paid to Hardy Bowen of which Mr Bowen is a Partner
Edward J Fry - Non-Executive Director
-
Term of Agreement – 2006 until terminated by either party
-
Salary - $40,000 per annum excluding super plus any expense incurred
-
Additional monies are paid to Gimbulki Services Pty Ltd for consulting services
Terence N Smith - Non-Executive Director
-
Term of Agreement – 2004 until terminated by either party
-
Salary - $40,000 per annum excluding super plus any expense incurred
Damian P Delaney - Chief Financial Officer and Company Secretary
-
Term of Agreement – 24 October 2005 until terminated by either party. Resigned 30 May 2008
-
Salary - $220,000 per annum excluding super plus any expense incurred
-
Early Termination – 3 months written notice or making a payment of 3 months salary in lieu. This applies to any reason other than gross misconduct
Scott L Rauschenberger – Financial Controller
-
Term of Agreement – 19 November 2007 until terminated by either party
-
Salary - $132,500 per annum excluding super plus any expense incurred
-
Early Termination – 1 month written notice or making a payment of 1 months salary in lieu. This applies to any reason other than gross misconduct
23
==> picture [596 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
2. directors and executives officers remuneration (Company and Consolidated) – audited
Details of the nature and amount of each major element of remuneration of each Director of the Company and relevant Group executives who receive the highest remuneration and other key management personnel are:
Directors remuneration for the year ended 30 June 2008
==> picture [495 x 290] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Company and Post
Consolidated Short term employment Long term
Share-based Value of options
Salary & payment as a proportion of
fees Other Super options Total remuneration
Directors $ $ $ $ $ %
John W Barr 2008 166,000 - 3,600 - 169,600 -
Chairman 2007 148,833 - 3,225 1,182,000 [1] 1,334,058 89%
Neil G Biddle 2008 228,664 - 3,600 - 232,264 -
Managing Director 2007 331,633 - 3,225 1,182,000 [1] 1,516,858 78%
Michael P Bowen 2008 40,000 - - - 40,000 -
Non-Executive 2007 98,091 - - 788,000 [1] 886,091 89%
Paul E Burton 2008 178,615 - 18,069 144,500 [3] 341,184 42%
Exploration Director 2007 79,615 - 7,165 144,500 [3] 231,280 62%
Edward J Fry 2008 160,000 - 3,600 289,036 [2] 452,636 64%
Non-Executive 2007 93,333 - 2,100 421,500 [2] 516,933 82%
Terence N Smith 2008 40,000 - 3,600 - 43,600 -
Non-Executive 2007 35,833 - 3,225 788,000 [1] 827,058 95%
Total 2008 813,279 - 32,469 289,036 1,134,784
2007 787,338 - 18,940 4,506,000 5,312,278
----- End of picture text -----
-
1 Options have been valued at $0.394 per option using the Black-Scholes calculation for June 2007
-
2 Options have been valued at $0.193 per option using the Black-Scholes calculation for November 2007
-
3 Options have been valued at $0.289 per option using the Black-Scholes calculation for the April 2007 issue
24
Annual Report 2008
Remuneration of the two named executives who received the highest remuneration for the year ended 30 June 2008
==> picture [496 x 172] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Company and Post
Consolidated Short term employment Long term
Share-based Value of options
Salary & payment as a proportion of
fees Other Super options Total remuneration
Executives $ $ $ $ $ %
Damian P Delaney [1 ] 2008 102,548 - 21,416 144,500 [3] 268,464 53%
CFO and Company
Secretary 2007 55,162 - 4,992 94,267 [2] 154,421 61%
Scott Rauschenberger [4 ] 2008 28,579 - 2,631 - 31,209 -
Financial Controller 2007 - - - - - -
2008 131,127 - 24,047 - 155,173
Total
2007 56,162 - 4,992 94,267 154,421
----- End of picture text -----
- 1 Damian P Delaney was remunerated by TNG Ltd at a current annual salary of $220,000 and recharged on a pro rata basis to Batavia Mining Ltd and Thor Mining PLC. Resigned 30 May 2008
2 Options have been valued at $0.101 per option using the Black-Scholes calculation for the May 2006 issue
3 Options have been valued at $0.289 per option using the Black-Scholes calculation for the April 2007 issue
4 Scott Rauschenberger is remunerated by TNG Ltd at a current annual salary of $132,500 and recharged on a pro rata basis to Batavia Mining Ltd and Thor Mining PLC. Appointed
The fair value of the options are calculated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes model and are allocated to each reporting period evenly over the period from grant date to vesting date. The value disclosed above is a portion of the fair value of the options allocated to this reporting period. The terms ‘director’ and ‘executive’ have been treated as mutually exclusive for the purposes of this disclosure.
The following factors and assumptions were used in determining the fair value of options on grant date.
==> picture [496 x 98] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Price of
Fair value Exercise shares on Expected Risk free Dividend
Grant date Expiry date per option price grant date volatility interest rate yield
19 June 2007 31 Mar 2010 $0.394 $0.50 $0.760 80.00% 6.48% Nil
30 Nov 2006 31 Nov 2007 $0.281 $0.23 $0.515 60.00% 6.02% Nil
5 Apr 2007 31 Dec 2011 $0.289 $0.38 $0.420 80.00% 6.09% Nil
13 Nov 2007 31 Mar 2010 $0.193 $0.49 $0.400 80.00% 6.71% Nil
----- End of picture text -----
25
==> picture [596 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
3. Options granted as part of remuneration – audited
During the year, the Company granted options for no consideration over unissued ordinary shares in the Company to the following Directors and executives as remuneration:
==> picture [483 x 63] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Number Number
of options of options Fair value
Director/ granted vested during of option at Exercise price Expiry date
Officer during 2008 [1] Grant date 2008 [1] grant date [2] per option of options
Edward J Fry 1,500,000 13 Nov 2007 1,500,000 $0.193 $0.49 31 March 2010
----- End of picture text -----
1 1,500,000 options were exercisable at 13 November 2007.
2 Options have been valued at $0.193 per option using the Black-Scholes calculation.
Options granted in the financial year ended 30 June 2008 were approved by shareholders at the Annual General Meeting held 8 November 2007. The options were provided at no cost to the recipients.
All option valuations have been calculated using the Black-Scholes calculation.
No options have been granted since the end of the financial year.
4. Exercise of options granted as compensation – audited
During the year the following shares were issued on the exercise of options previously granted as remuneration:
==> picture [495 x 58] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Amount paid
2008 Number of shares $/share
Directors
Edward J Fry 1,400,000 $0.17
----- End of picture text -----
There are no amounts unpaid on the shares issued as a result of the exercise of the options in the 2008 financial year.
5. Analysis of options and rights over equity instruments granted as compensation – unaudited.
Details of the vesting profile of the options granted as remuneration to each key management person of the group and each of the five named Company and Group executives are detailed below:
==> picture [495 x 89] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Options granted
Forfeited in year Financial years in
Number Date % vested in year (a) which grant vests
Directors
Edward J Fry 1,500,000 13 Nov 2007 100% - 2008
Damian P Delaney 1,500,000 5 April 2007 33.3% 66.6% 2008
----- End of picture text -----
a) The percentage forfeited in the year represents the reduction from the maximum number of options available to vest due to the highest level performance criteria not being achieved.
26
Annual Report 2008
6. Analysis of movements in options - audited
The movement during the reporting period, by value, of options over ordinary shares held by each key management person of the Group and each of the five named Company and Group executives are detailed below:
==> picture [495 x 89] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Value of options
Granted in year (a) Exercised in year (b) Lapsed in year (c)
$ $ $
Directors
Edward J Fry 285,000 421,500 -
Damian P Delaney - - 289,036
----- End of picture text -----
-
(a) The value of the options granted in the year is the fair value of the options calculated at the grant date using the Black-Scholes model. The total value of the options granted is included in the table above. This amount is allocated to remuneration over the vesting period.
-
(b) The value of the options exercised during the year is calculated as the market price of shares of the Company on the ASX as at close of trading on the date the options were exercised after deducting the price paid to exercise the option.
-
(c) The value of the options that lapsed during the year represents the benefit forgone and is calculated at the date the option lapsed using the Black-Scholes model with no adjustments for whether the performance criteria have or have not been achieved.
dIRECTORS’ INTERESTS
The relevant interest of each Director in the shares and options over such instruments issued by the companies within the Group and other related body corporates, as notified by the Directors to the ASX in accordance with S205G(1) of the Corporations Act 2001, at the date of this report is as follows:
==> picture [495 x 109] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Director Ordinary shares Options over ordinary shares
John W Barr 9,980,000 3,000,000
Neil G Biddle 5,308,280 3,000,000
Paul Burton 600,000 1,500,000
Michael P Bowen 4,081,362 2,000,000
Edward J Fry 2,263,392 1,500,000
Terence N Smith 6,590,887 2,000,000
----- End of picture text -----
Options granted to directors and officers of the Company
During or since the end of the financial year, the Company granted options for no consideration over unissued ordinary shares in the Company to the following directors and to the following of the five most highly remunerated officers of the Company as part of their remuneration:
==> picture [495 x 34] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Directors Number of options granted Exercise price Expiry date
Edward J Fry 1,500,000 $0.49 31 March 2010
----- End of picture text -----
All options were granted during the financial year. No options have been granted since the end of the financial year.
27
==> picture [596 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
Unissued shares under option
At the date of this report unissued ordinary shares of the Company under option are:
==> picture [495 x 79] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Expiry date Exercise price [1] Number of options
31 December 2011 $0.38 4,100,000 [2]
31 March 2010 $0.50 14,000,000
1 November 2009 $0.75 200,000
31 August 2011 $0.15 500,000
----- End of picture text -----
1 Subsequent to the balance sheet date the exercise prices have been adjusted in accordance with ASX Listing Rule 7.22.3 due to the capital reduction as a result of the distribution of the investments in Batavia Mining Ltd, Thor Mining PLC and Western Desert Resources Ltd.
2 Includes 500,000 options not yet vested.
ETHICAL STANdARdS
All Directors, managers and employees are expected to act with the utmost integrity and objectivity, striving at all times to enhance the reputation and performance of the Group. Every employee has a nominated supervisor to whom they may refer any issues arising from their employment.
Responsibilities to clients, customers and consumers
The Company is to comply with all legislative and common law requirements which affect its business, in particular those in respect of occupational health and safety, the environment, native title and cultural heritage. Any transgression from the applicable legal rules is to be reported to the Managing Director as soon as a person becomes aware of such a transgression.
Code of Conduct
This code of conduct sets out the standard which the Board, management and employees of the Company are encouraged to comply with when dealing with each other, shareholders and the broader community.
Commitment of the Board and Management to Corporate Code of Conduct
The Board and management approve and endorse this code of conduct and support the code and all it strives to achieve.
The Board and management encourage all staff to consider the principles of the code and use them as a guide to determining how to respond when acting on behalf of the Company.
Employment practices
The Company will employ the best available staff and consultants with skills required to carry out vacant positions.
The Company will ensure a safe work place and maintain proper occupational health and safety practices commensurate with the nature of the Company’s business and activities.
Responsibility to the community
The Company will recognise, consider and respect environmental issues which arise in relation to the Company’s activities and comply with all applicable legal requirements.
Responsibilities to shareholders and the financial community generally
The Company aims:
To increase shareholder value within an appropriate framework which safeguards the rights and interests of the Company’s shareholders and the financial community; and
To comply with systems of control and accountability which the Company has in place as part of its corporate governance with openness and integrity.
Responsibility to the individual
The Company recognises and respects the rights of individuals and to the best of its ability will comply with the applicable legal rules regarding privacy, privileges, private and confidential information.
Obligations relative to fair trading and dealing
The Company will deal with others in a way that is fair and will not engage in deceptive practices.
28
Annual Report 2008
Conflicts of interest
The Board, management and employees must not involve themselves in situations where there is a real or apparent conflict of interest between them as individuals and the interests of the Company. Where a real or apparent conflict of interest arises the matter should be brought to the attention of the Chairman in the case of a Board member or the Managing Director, the Managing Director in the case of a member of management and a supervisor in the case of an employee, so that it may be considered and dealt with in an appropriate manner for all concerned.
-
Protect the assets of the Company to ensure availability for legitimate business purposes and ensure all corporate opportunities are enjoyed by the Company and that no property, information or position belonging to the Company or opportunity arising from these are used for personal gain or to compete with the Company.
-
Report any breach of this code of conduct to the chairperson, who will treat reports made in good faith of such violations with respect and in confidence.
Indigenous Policy
Compliance with the Code
Any breach of compliance with this code is to be reported directly to the Managing Director or Chairperson, as appropriate.
Periodic review of Code
The Company will monitor compliance with the code periodically by liaising with the Board, management and staff especially in relation to any areas of difficulty which arise from the code and any other ideas or suggestions for improvement of the code. Suggestions for improvements or amendments to the code can be made at any time by providing a written note to the Managing Director.
Incorporation of Code of Conduct for executives
The Code of Conduct for executives forms part of this Corporate Code of Conduct. It provides as follows:
TNG recognises the traditional attachment and customary requirements and preservation of culture and customs by Indigenous people in relation to land.
It is our desire to develop long term relationships with Indigenous people and communities where we conduct exploration and mine development and operations.
The Manbarrum project is situated on land which the Mirriwung-Gaejerronng people are the traditional owners. TNG meets formally bi-annually with the community and also meets regularly with senior members of the community to review the community objectives.
In addition several members of the community are either full time or casual employees. There is also open dialogue with the NLC and ARPA in respect to the Company’s activities.
The Company’s Indigenous Policy can be found on our website www.tngltd.com.au .
All executives will:
LIKELY dEVELOPMENTS
-
Actively promote the highest standards of ethics and integrity in carrying out their duties for the Company.
-
Disclose any actual or perceived conflicts of interest of a direct or indirect nature of which they become aware and which they believe could compromise in any way the reputation or performance of the Company.
-
Respect confidentiality of all information of a confidential nature which is acquired in the course of the Company’s business and not disclose or make improper use of such confidential information to any person unless specific authorisation is given for disclosure or disclosure is legally mandated.
-
Deal with the Company’s customers, suppliers, competitors and each other with the highest level of honesty, fairness and integrity and to observe the rule and spirit of the legal and regulatory environment in which the Company operates.
The Group will continue to develop its Northern Territory exploration projects and manage its interest in the Cawse Extended project.
Additional comments on likely developments of the Group are included under the review of operations and activities of this report.
INdEMNIFICATION ANd INSURANCE OF dIRECTORS ANd OFFICERS
The Company has agreed to indemnify current and former Directors and officers against all liabilities to another person (other than the Company or a related body corporate), including legal expenses that may arise from their position as Directors and officers of the Company and its controlled entities, except where the liability arises out of conduct involving a lack of good faith or for a pecuniary penalty under section 1317G or a compensation order under section 1317H of the Corporations Act 2001.
29
==> picture [596 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
INSURANCE PREMIUMS
The Directors have not included details of the amount of the premium paid in respect of the Directors’ and Officers’ liability insurance contracts, as such disclosure is prohibited under the terms of the contract.
ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS
The Group’s operations are not subject to any significant environmental regulations under either Commonwealth or State legislation. However, the Board believes that the Group has adequate systems in place for the management of its environmental requirements and is not aware of any breach of those environmental requirements as they apply to the Group.
EVENTS SUBSEQUENT TO REPORTING dATE
Change of directorship
NON AUdIT SERVICES
KPMG, the Company’s auditor did not perform any other services in addition to their statutory duties.
AUdITOR INdEPENdENCE dECLARATION
The auditor’s independence declaration is included on page 79 of the financial report and forms part of the Directors’ Report for the financial year ended 30 June 2008.
Signed in accordance with a resolution of the Directors.
==> picture [132 x 63] intentionally omitted <==
John W Barr Chairman
25 September 2008
Paul Burton was appointed Director on the 11 July 2008.
davis Samuel
The court hearing in relation to the Davis Samuel case recommenced in Canberra in August 2008, proceedings are still ongoing.
Rights Issue
On the 15 August 2008 TNG issued new shares as part of an underwritten pro rata rights issue. The pro rata offer was on the basis of 1 share for every 4 shares held at the record date each at an issue price of $0.06. The issue of 48,170,734 shares raised $2,890,250 before costs.
Private Placement
Due to strong demand for the shortfall from the rights issue the Company completed a private placement on 1 September 2008. A Total of 17,200,934 shares raising $1,032,056 were issued at $0.06.
30
Annual Report 2008
Lead auditor’s independence declaration under Section 307C of the Corporations Act 2001
==> picture [494 x 591] intentionally omitted <==
31
==> picture [596 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
Income Statements
For the year ended 30 June 2008
| Note Gain on sale of tenements 15 Other income 6(a) Total income Corporate and administration expenses 6(c) Employment expenses 6(d) Depreciation and amortisation expenses 6(e) Impairment loss on subsidiary loan receivable 12 Impairment loss of investment in associates 13 Other expenses Results from operating activities Financial income Financial expenses Net fnancing income 6(b) Share of proft from equity accounting Loss before income tax Income tax expense 8 Net loss for the year Basic loss per share 9 Diluted loss per share 9 |
CONSOLIDATED ThE COMPANY 2008 2007 2008 2007 $ $ $ $ |
|---|---|
| 941,481 - - - - 109,759 - 9,759 |
|
| 941,481 109,759 - 9,759 (1,451,930) (911,829) (1,279,074) (655,000) (1,876,709) (9,185,602) (1,830,094) (9,117,065) (308,145) (263,490) (134,860) (113,366) - - (57,160) - - (2,965,091) - (1,981,926) (18,436) (211,683) - (106,780) |
|
| (2,713,739) (13,427,936) (3,301,188) (11,964,378) 330,550 7,288,789 330,550 6,289,590 (38,640) (11,603) (2,603) - |
|
| 291,910 7,277,186 327,947 6,289,590 |
|
| - 498,660 - - |
|
| (2,421,829) (5,652,091) (2,973,241) (5,674,788) |
|
| - - - - |
|
| (2,421,829) (5,652,091) (2,973,241) (5,674,788) |
|
| (1.283) (4.819) (1.283) (4.819) |
The income statements are to be read in conjunction with the notes to the financial statements.
32
Annual Report 2008
Balance Sheets
As at 30 June 2008
| Note Current assets Cash and cash equivalents 11 Other receivables 12 Prepayments Other investments 13 Total current assets Non-current assets Other receivables 12 Other investments 13 Plant and equipment 14 Exploration and evaluation expenditure 15 Total non-current assets Total assets Current liabilities Trade and other payables 16 Provisions 18 Total current liabilities Non-current liabilities Loans and borrowings 17 Total non-current liabilities Total liabilities Net assets Equity Issued capital 19 Reserves Retained earnings Total equity |
CONSOLIDATED ThE COMPANY 2008 2007 2008 2007 $ $ $ $ |
|---|---|
| 4,127,494 9,880,637 4,094,334 9,773,339 82,397 281,381 52,648 125,292 47,768 26,486 45,942 23,645 6,493 50,864 6,493 50,864 |
|
| 4,264,152 10,239,368 4,199,417 9,973,140 |
|
| - - 13,135,596 4,559,064 208,834 566,663 1,865,157 2,222,986 1,147,995 1,436,806 212,042 327,078 16,985,982 9,433,453 - - |
|
| 18,342,811 11,436,922 15,212,795 7,109,128 |
|
| 22,606,963 21,676,290 19,412,212 17,082,268 |
|
| 762,759 1,051,150 399,060 279,592 26,493 32,850 26,493 32,850 |
|
| 789,252 1,084,000 425,553 312,442 |
|
| 480,000 480,000 - 456,876 |
|
| 480,000 480,000 - 456,876 |
|
| 1,269,252 1,564,000 425,553 769,318 |
|
| 21,337,710 20,112,290 18,986,658 16,312,950 |
|
| 20,478,198 15,490,639 20,478,198 15,490,639 (11,823) 237,246 (11,823) 237,246 871,335 4,384,405 (1,479,717) 585,065 |
|
| 21,337,710 20,112,290 18,986,658 16,312,950 |
The balance sheets are to be read in conjunction with the notes to the financial statements.
33
==> picture [596 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
Statements of Cash Flows
For the year ended 30 June 2008
| Note Cash fows from operating activities Cash payments in the course of operations Interest received Sale of tenements Proceeds from royalties Net cash used in operating activities 24 Cash fows from investing activities Payments for land and buildings Proceeds from sale of investments Net loan to controlled entities Payments for plant and equipment Payments for investments in associates Payments for exploration and evaluation expenditure Net cash used in investing activities Cash fows from fnancing activities Net proceeds on issue of shares and options Proceeds from loan Lease payments Net cash received from fnancing activities Net increase in cash held Cash at the beginning of the fnancial year Cash at the end of the fnancial year 11 |
CONSOLIDATED ThE COMPANY 2008 2007 2008 2007 $ $ $ $ |
|---|---|
| (2,523,301) (1,439,476) (2,037,253) (1,051,585) 379,732 159,457 379,732 161,113 - 48,853 - - - 9,877 - - |
|
| (2,143,569) (1,221,289) (1,657,521) (890,472) - (715,958) - - 103,950 - 103,950 - - - (9,090,567) (4,923,067) (37,770) (872,155) (19,823) (332,114) - (173,476) - (173,476) (8,624,674) (3,712,529) - - |
|
| (8,558,494) (5,474,118) (9,006,440) (5,428,657) 4,987,559 12,777,840 4,987,559 12,777,840 - 480,000 - - (38,640) (8,928) (2,603) (8,928) |
|
| 5,948,920 13,248,912 4,984,956 12,768,912 (5,753,143) 6,553,505 (5,679,005) 6,449,783 9,880,637 3,327,132 9,773,339 3,323,556 |
|
| 4,127,494 9,880,637 4,094,334 9,773,339 |
The statements of cash flows are to be read in conjunction with the notes to the financial statements.
34
Annual Report 2008
Statements of Changes in Equity
For the year ended 30 June 2008
| CONSOLIDATED At 1 July 2006 (restated) Net change in available-for-sale fnancial assets Foreign currency translation reserve Share issue costs Total income and expense recognised directly in equity Loss for the period Total recognised directly in equity Share based payments expense Shares issued Share placement In specie distribution Options exercised At 30 June 2007 At 1 July 2007 Net change in fair value of available for sale assets, net of tax Net gain in fair value available for sale assets transferred to proft and loss on disposal, net of tax Fair value decline recognised in fair value reserve transferred to proft and loss due to impairment Share issue costs Total income and expense recognised directly in equity Loss for the period Total recognised directly in equity Share based payments expense Share placement In specie distribution Options exercised At 30 June 2008 |
Foreign currency Issued Retained Fair value translation Option capital earnings reserve reserves reserve Total $ $ $ $ $ |
|---|---|
| 9,346,022 2,972,423 (158,606) 34,214 1,003,370 13,197,423 - - 395,852 - - 395,852 - - - (34,214) - (34,214) (301,673) - - - - (301,673) |
|
| (301,673) - 395,852 (34,214) - 59,965 - (5,652,091) - - - (5,652,091) |
|
| - (5,652,091) - (5,652,091) - 7,064,073 - - - 7,064,073 12,179,513 - - - - 12,179,513 2,340,000 - - - - 2,340,000 (9,076,593) - - - - (9,076,593) 1,003,370 - - - (1,003,370) - |
|
| 15,490,639 4,384,405 237,246 - - 20,112,290 |
|
| 15,490,639 4,384,405 237,246 - - 20,112,290 - - (219,744) - - (219,744) - - (133,350) - - (133,350) - - 104,025 - - 104,025 (268,441) - - - - (268,441) |
|
| (268,441) (249,069) (517,510) - (2,421,829) - - - (2,421,829) |
|
| - (2,421,829) - (2,421,829) - 908,459 - - - 908,459 5,000,000 - - - - 5,000,000 - (1,999,700) - - - (1,999,700) 256,000 - - - - 256,000 |
|
| 20,478,198 871,335 (11,823) - - 21,337,710 |
The amounts recognised directly in equity are disclosed net of tax. The statements of changes in equity are to read in conjunction with the notes to the financial statements.
35
==> picture [596 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
Statements of Changes in Equity
For the year ended 30 June 2008 (continued)
| COMPANY At 1 July 2006 (restated) Net change in available-for-sale fnancial assets Share issue costs Total income and expense recognised directly in equity Loss for the period Total recognised directly in equity Share based payments expense Shares issued Share placement In specie distribution Options exercised At 30 June 2007 At 1 July 2007 Net change in fair value of available for sale assets, net of tax Net gain in fair value available for sale assets transferred to proft and loss on disposal, net of tax Fair value decline recognised in fair value reserve transferred to proft and loss due to impairment Share issue costs Total income and expense recognised directly in equity Loss for the period Total recognised directly in equity Share based payments expense Shares issued Share placement In specie distribution Options exercised At 30 June 2008 |
Foreign currency Issued Retained Fair value translation Option capital earnings reserve reserves reserve Total $ $ $ $ $ |
|---|---|
| 9,346,022 (804,220) (103,536) - 1,003,370 9,441,636 - - 340,782 - - 340,782 (301,673) - - - - (301,673) |
|
| (301,673) - 340,782 39,109 - (5,674,788) - - - (5,674,788) |
|
| - (5,674,788) - - - (5,674,788) - 7,064,073 - - - 7,064,073 12,179,513 - - - - 12,179,513 2,340,000 - - - - 2,340,000 (9,076,593) - - - - (9,076,593) 1,003,370 - - - (1,003,370) - |
|
| 15,490,639 585,064 237,246 - - 16,312,950 |
|
| 15,490,639 585,064 237,246 - - 16,312,950 - - (219,744) - - (219,744) - - (133,350) - - (133,350) - - 104,025 - - 104,025 (268,441) - - - - (268,441) |
|
| (268,441) - (249,069) - - (517,510) - (2,973,241) - - - (2,973,241) |
|
| - (2,973,241) - (2,973,241) - 908,459 - - - 908,459 - - - - - - 5,000,000 - - - - 5,000,000 - - - - - - 256,000 - - - - 256,000 |
|
| 20,478,198 (1,479,717) (11,823) - - 18,986,658 |
The amounts recognised directly in equity are disclosed net of tax.
The statements of changes in equity are to read in conjunction with the notes to the financial statements.
36
Annual Report 2008
Notes to the Financial Statements
For the year ended 30 June 2008
1. REPORTING ENTITY
TNG Limited (the ‘Company’) is a company domiciled in Australia. The consolidated financial report of the Company as at and for the year ended 30 June 2008 comprise the Company and its subsidiaries (together referred to as the ‘Group’) and the Group’s interest in associates. The financial report was authorised for issue by the Directors on 25 September 2008.
The Group is primarily involved in the exploration of its Manbarrum Project; the review of advanced exploration projects for acquisition; the management of its other exploration properties and management of its interest in the Cawse Extended Project.
2. BASIS OF PREPARATION
(a) Statement of compliance
The financial report is a general purpose financial report which has been prepared in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards (AASBs) (including Australian Interpretations) adopted by the Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB) and the Corporations Act 2001. The consolidated financial report of the Group and the financial report of the Company comply with International Financial Reporting Standards and interpretations adopted by the International Accounting Standards Board.
(b) Basis of measurement
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the historical cost basis except for the following:
-
financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss are measured at fair value
-
available-for-sale financial assets are measured at fair value
The methods used to measure fair values are discussed further in Note 4.
(c) Functional and presentation currency
These consolidated financial statements are presented in Australian dollars, which is the Company’s functional currency and the functional currency of all entities in the Group.
(d) Use of estimates and judgements
The preparation of financial statements requires management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimate is revised and in any future periods affected.
In particular, information about significant areas of estimation, uncertainty and critical judgements in applying accounting policies that have the most significant effect on the amount recognised in the financial statements are described in the following notes:
-
Notes 18 & 21 – provisions and contingencies
-
Note 5 – valuation of financial instruments
-
Note 25 – measurement of share-based payments
37
==> picture [596 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
Notes to the Financial Statements
For the year ended 30 June 2008
3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The accounting policies set out below have been applied consistently to all periods presented in these consolidated financial statements, and have been applied consistently by Group entities.
(a) Basis of consolidation
(i) Subsidiaries
Subsidiaries are entities controlled by the Company. Control exists when the Company has the power, directly or indirectly, to govern the financial and operating policies of an entity so as to obtain benefits from its activities. In assessing control, potential voting rights that presently are exercisable or convertible are taken into account. The financial statements of subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial report from the date that control commences until the date that control ceases. Investments in subsidiaries are carried at their cost of acquisition in the Company’s financial statements less impairment losses.
(ii) Associates
Associates are those entities over which the Group has significant influence, but not control, over the financial and operating policies. Associates are accounted for using the equity method. The consolidated financial statements include the Group’s share of income and expenses of associates, from the date that significant influence commences until the date that significant influence ceases.
When the Group’s share of losses exceeds its interest in an associate, the Group’s carrying amount is reduced to nil and recognition of further losses is discontinued except to the extent that the Group has incurred legal or constructive obligations or made payments on behalf of an associate.
In the Company’s financial statements investment in associates are carried at cost of acquisition.
- (iii) Transactions eliminated on consolidation
Intragroup balances, and any unrealised gains and losses or income and expenses arising from intragroup transactions, are eliminated in preparing the consolidated financial statements.
Unrealised gains arising from transactions with associates are eliminated against the investment to the extent of the Group’s interest in the entity.
Unrealised losses are eliminated in the same way as unrealised gains, but only to the extent that there is no evidence of impairment.
Gains and losses are recognised as the contributed assets are consumed or sold by the associates, if not consumed or sold by the associate, when the Group’s interest in such entities is disposed of.
(b) Income tax
Current tax assets and liabilities for the current and prior periods are measured at the amount expected to be recovered from or paid to the taxation authorities. The tax rates and tax laws used to compute the amounts are those that are enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date.
Deferred income tax is provided on all temporary differences at the balance sheet date between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes.
38
Annual Report 2008
Deferred income tax liabilities are recognised for all taxable temporary differences:
-
(i) Except where the deferred income tax liability arises from the initial recognition of goodwill or of an asset or liability in a transaction that is not a business combination and at the time of transaction, affects neither the accounting profit nor taxable profit or loss; and
-
(ii) In respect of taxable temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries and associates except where the timing of the reversal of the temporary differences can be controlled and it is probable that the temporary differences will not reverse in the foreseeable future.
Deferred income tax assets are recognised for all deductible temporary differences, carry-forward of unused tax assets and unused tax losses, to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which the deductible temporary differences and the carry-forward of unused tax credits and unused tax losses can be utilised;
-
(iii) When the deferred income tax asset relating to the deductible temporary difference arises from the initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction that is not a business combination and, at the time of the transaction, affects neither the accounting profit nor taxable profit or loss; or
-
(iv) When the deductible temporary difference is associated with investments in subsidiaries and associates in which case a deferred tax asset is only recognised to the extent that it is probable that the temporary differences will reverse in the foreseeable future and taxable profit will be available against which the temporary difference can be utilised.
The carrying amount of deferred income tax assets is reviewed at each balance sheet date reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow all or part of the deferred income tax asset to be utilised.
Unrecognised deferred income tax assets are reassessed at each balance sheet date and are recognised to the extent that it has become probable that future taxable profit will allow the deferred tax asset to be recovered.
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the year when the asset is realised or the liability is settled, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date.
Income taxes relating to items recognised directly in equity are recognised in equity and not in the income statement.
Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are offset only if a legally enforceable right exists to set off current tax liabilities and the deferred tax assets and liabilities relate to the same taxable entity and the same taxation authority.
(c) Goods and services tax
Revenues, expenses and assets are recognised net of the amount of GST except:
-
(i) Where the GST incurred on a purchase of goods and services is not recoverable from the taxation authority, in which case the GST is recognised as part of the cost of acquisition of the asset or as part of the expense item as applicable;
-
(ii) Receivables and payables are stated with the amount of GST included;
-
(iii) The net amount of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority is included as part of receivables or payables in the balance sheet;
-
(iv) Cash flows are included in the Cash Flow Statement on a gross basis and the GST component of cash flows arising from investing and financing activities, which is recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority, are classified as operating cash flows; and
-
(v) Commitments and contingencies are disclosed net of the amount of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority.
39
==> picture [596 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
Notes to the Financial Statements
For the year ended 30 June 2008
(d) Plant and equipment
(i) Recognition and measurement
Items of plant and equipment are stated at cost or deemed cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. The cost of property and equipment at 1 July 2004, the date of transition to AASBs was determined by reference to its fair at that date. Cost includes expenditure that is directly attributable to the acquisition of the asset.
Where parts of an item of plant and equipment have different useful lives, they are accounted for as separate items of plant and equipment.
(ii) Leased assets
Leases in terms of which the Group assumes substantially all of the risks and rewards of ownership are classified as finance leases. Lease payments are accounted for as described in note 3(n).
(iii) Subsequent costs
The Group recognises in the carrying amount of an item of plant and equipment the cost of replacing part of such an item when that cost is incurred if it is probable that the future economic benefits embodied within the item will flow to the Group and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. All other costs are recognised in the income statement as an expense as incurred.
(iv) Depreciation
Depreciation is charged to the income statement on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of each part of an item of plant and equipment. The estimated useful lives in the current and comparative periods are as follows:
==> picture [183 x 61] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Leasehold improvements 4 years
Plant and equipment 3 to 8 years
Fixtures and fittings 3 to 8 years
Buildings 40 years
----- End of picture text -----
The residual value, the useful life and the depreciation method applied to an asset are reassessed annually.
(e) Foreign currency translation
Transactions in foreign currencies are translated to the functional currency of the Group at the foreign exchange rate ruling at the date of the transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at the balance sheet date are translated to Australian dollars at the foreign exchange rate ruling at that date. Foreign exchange differences arising on translation are recognised in the income statement. Non-monetary assets and liabilities that are measured in terms of historical cost in a foreign currency are translated using the exchange rate at the date of the transaction. Non-monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies that are stated at fair value are translated to Australian dollars at foreign exchange rates ruling at the dates the fair value was determined.
40
Annual Report 2008
(f) Financial instruments
(i) Non-derivative financial instruments
Non-derivative financial instruments comprise investments in equity and other receivables, cash and cash equivalents, loans and borrowings, and trade and other payables.
Non-derivative financial instruments are recognised initially at fair value plus, for instruments not at fair value through profit or loss, any directly attributable transaction costs, except as described below. Subsequent to initial recognition non-derivative financial instruments are measured as described below.
A financial instrument is recognised if the Group becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument. Financial assets are derecognised if the Group’s contractual rights to the cash flows from the financial assets expire or if the Group transfers the financial assets to another party without retaining control or substantially all risks and rewards of the asset. Regular way purchases and sales of financial assets are accounted for at trade dates, i.e. the date that the Group commits itself to purchase or sell the asset. Financial liabilities are derecognised if the Group’s obligations specified in the contract expire or are discharged or cancelled.
Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash balances and call deposits.
Accounting for finance income and expense is discussed in note 3(m).
Available-for-sale financial assets
The Group’s investments in equity securities are classified as available-for-sale financial assets. Subsequent to initial recognition, they are measured at fair value and changes therein, other than impairment losses (see note 3(h) and foreign exchange gains and losses on available-for-sale monetary items (see note 3(e)), are recognised as a separate component of equity. When an investment is derecognised, the cumulative gain or loss in equity is transferred to profit and loss.
Investments at fair value through profit and loss
An instrument is classified as at fair value through profit or loss if it is held for trading or is designated as such upon initial recognition. Financial instruments are designated at fair value through profit or loss if the Group manages such investments and makes purchase and sale decisions based on their fair value in accordance with the Group’s documented risk management or investment strategy. Upon initial recognition, attributable transaction costs are recognised in profit or loss when incurred. Financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss are measured at fair value, and changes therein are recognised in profit or loss.
Other
Other non-derivative financial instruments are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method, less any impairment loss.
(ii) Share capital
Ordinary shares
Incremental costs directly attributable to issue of ordinary shares and share options are recognised as a deduction from equity, net of any related income tax benefit.
41
==> picture [596 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
Notes to the Financial Statements
For the year ended 30 June 2008
(g) Exploration and evaluation expenditure
Exploration and evaluation expenditure is stated at cost and is accumulated in respect of each identifiable area of interest.
Mining tenements that had been revalued to fair value on or prior to 1 July 2004, the date of transition to Australian Accounting Standards – AIFRS, are measured on the basis of deemed cost, being the revalued amount at the date of that revaluation.
Such costs are only carried forward when the rights to tenure of that area of interest are current and either such expenditure is expected to be recouped through the successful development and commercial exploitation of the area of interest (or alternatively by its sale), or where activities in the area have not yet reached a stage which permits a reasonable assessment of the existence or otherwise of economically recoverable reserves, and active and significant operations are continuing.
Accumulated costs in relation to an abandoned area are written off to the income statement in the period in which the decision to abandon the area is made.
The Directors review the carrying value of each area of interest at balance date and exploration expenditure which no longer satisfies the above policy is written off.
AASB 6 Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources has been applied effective 1 July 2004.
(h) Impairment
(i) Financial assets
A financial asset is considered to be impaired if objective evidence indicates that one or more events have had a negative effect on the estimated future cash flows of that asset.
An impairment loss in respect of a financial asset measured at amortised cost is calculated as the difference between its carrying amount, and the present value of the estimated future cash flows discounted at the original effective interest rate. An impairment loss in respect of an available-for-sale financial asset is calculated by reference to its current fair value.
Individually significant financial assets are tested for impairment on an individual basis. The remaining financial assets are assessed collectively in groups that share similar credit risk characteristics.
All impairment losses are recognised in profit or loss. Any cumulative loss in respect of an available-for-sale financial asset recognised previously in equity is transferred to profit or loss.
An impairment loss is reversed if the reversal can be related objectively to an event occurring after the impairment loss was recognised. For financial assets measured at amortised cost and available-for-sale financial assets that are debt securities, the reversal is recognised in profit or loss. For available-for-sale financial assets that are equity securities, the reversal is recognised directly in equity.
(ii) Non-financial assets
The carrying amounts of the Group’s non-financial assets, other than deferred tax assets, are reviewed at each reporting date to determine whether there is any indication of impairment. If any such indication exists then the asset’s recoverable amount is estimated. For goodwill and intangible assets that have indefinite lives or that are not yet available for use, recoverable amount is estimated at each reporting date.
42
Annual Report 2008
(h) Impairment (continued)
An impairment loss is recognised if the carrying amount of an asset or its cash-generating unit exceeds its recoverable amount. A cash-generating unit is the smallest identifiable asset group that generates cash flows that largely are independent from other assets and groups. Impairment losses are recognised in profit or loss. Impairment losses recognised in respect of cash-generating units are allocated first to reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill allocated to the units and then to reduce the carrying amount of the other assets in the unit (group of units) on a pro rata basis.
The recoverable amount of an asset or cash-generating unit is the greater of its value in use and its fair value less costs to sell. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset.
An impairment loss in respect of goodwill is not reversed. In respect of other assets, impairment losses recognised in prior periods are assessed at each reporting date for any indications that the loss has decreased or no longer exists. An impairment loss is reversed if there has been a change in the estimates used to determine the recoverable amount. An impairment loss is reversed only to the extent that the asset’s carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of depreciation of amortisation, if no impairment loss had been recognised.
(i) Loans and borrowings
All loans and borrowings are initially recognised at the fair value of the consideration received net of issue costs associated with the borrowing.
After initial recognition, interest bearing loans and borrowings are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method. Amortised cost is calculated by taking into account any issue costs, and any discount or premium on settlement.
Gains and losses are recognised in the income statement when the liabilities are derecognised as well as through the amortisation process.
(j) Employee benefits
(i) Share based payments
The Group provides benefits to employees (including Directors) of the Group in the form of share-based payment transactions, whereby employees render services in exchange for share’s or rights over shares (‘equity-settled transactions’).
The fair value of these equity-settled transactions with employees is measured by reference to the fair value of the equity instruments at the date at which they are granted. The fair value is determined by an external valuer using a Black-Scholes model.
In valuing equity-settled transactions, no account is taken of any performance conditions, other than conditions linked to the price of the shares of TNG ‘market conditions’ if applicable.
The fair value of equity-settled transactions are recognised, together with a corresponding increase in equity over the period, ending on the date on which the relevant employees become fully entitled to the award (the ‘vesting date’).
The cumulative expense recognised for equity-settled transactions at each reporting date until vesting date reflects (i) the extent to which the vesting period has expired and (ii) TNG’s best estimate of the number of equity instruments that will ultimately vest. No adjustment is made for the likelihood of market conditions being met as the effect of these conditions is included in the determination of fair value at grant date. The income statement charge or credit for a period represents the movement in cumulative expense recognised as at the beginning and end of the period.
No expense is recognised for awards that do not ultimately vest, except for awards where vesting is only conditional upon a market condition.
43
==> picture [596 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
Notes to the Financial Statements
For the year ended 30 June 2008
(j) Employee benefits (continued)
(i) Share based payments (continued)
If the terms of an equity-settled award are modified, as a minimum, an expense is recognised as if the terms had not been modified. In addition, an expense is recognised for any modification that increases the total fair value of the share-based payment arrangement, or is otherwise beneficial to the employee as measured at the date of modification.
If an equity-settled award is cancelled, it is treated as if it had vested on the date of cancellation, and any expense not yet recognised for the award is recognised immediately. However, if a new award is substituted for the cancelled award and designated as a replacement award on the date that it is granted, the cancelled and new award are treated as if they were a modification of the original award, as described in the previous paragraph.
The dilutive effect, if any, of outstanding options is reflected as additional share dilution in the computation of earnings per share.
(ii) Short term benefit
Liabilities for employee benefits for wages, salaries, annual leave and sick leave represent present obligations resulting from employees’ services provided to reporting date, calculated at undiscounted amounts based on remuneration wage and salary rates that the Group expects to pay as at reporting date including related on-costs, such as, workers compensation insurance and payroll tax.
(iii) Defined contribution funds
Obligations for contributions to defined contribution superannuation funds are recognised as an expense in the income statement as incurred.
(k) Provisions
A provision is recognised in the balance sheet when the Group has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of a past event, and it is probable that an outflow of economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation. If the effect is material, provisions are determined by discounting the expected future cash flows at a pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and, when appropriate, the risks specific to the liability.
(l) Income and expenses
(i) Operating lease payments
Payments made under operating leases are recognised in the income statement on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Lease incentives received are recognised in the income statement as an integral part of the total lease expense and spread over the term of lease.
(ii) Finance lease payments
Minimum lease payments are apportioned between the finance charge and the reduction of the outstanding liability. The finance charge is allocated to each period during the lease term so as to produce a constant periodic rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability.
44
Annual Report 2008
(iii) Finance income and expenses
Finance income comprises interest income on funds invested, dividend income, gains on the disposal of available-for-sale financial assets, changes in the fair value of financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, foreign currency gains, and gains on hedging instruments that are recognised in profit or loss. Interest income is recognised as it accrues, using the effective interest method. Dividend income is recognised on the date that the Group’s right to receive payment is established, which in the case of quoted securities is the ex-dividend date.
Finance expenses comprise interest expense on borrowings, unwinding of the discount on provisions, foreign currency losses, changes in the fair value of financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, impairment losses recognised on financial assets, and losses on hedging instruments that are recognised in profit or loss. All borrowing costs are recognised in profit or loss using the effective interest method.
(iv) Sale of goods
Income from the sale of tenements and assets held for trading are recognised when significant risk and rewards of ownership of the goods passes to the customer provided that the amount of revenue and the costs incurred or to be incurred can be measured reliably.
(m) Leased assets
Leases in terms of which the Group assumes substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership are classified as finance leases. Upon initial recognition the leased asset is measured at an amount equal to the lower of its fair value and the present value of the minimum lease payments. Subsequent to initial recognition, the asset is accounted for in accordance with the accounting policy applicable to that asset.
Other leases are operating leases which are not recognised on the Group’s balance sheet.
(n) Segment reporting
A segment is a distinguishable component of the Group that is engaged either in providing products or services (business segment), or in providing products or services within a particular economic environment (geographical segment), which is subject to risks and rewards that are different from those of other segments.
(o) Earnings per share
The Group presents basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) data for its ordinary shares. Basic EPS is calculated by dividing the profit or loss attributable to ordinary shareholders of the Company by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is determined by adjusting the profit or loss attributable to ordinary shareholders and the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding for the effects of all diluted potential ordinary shares, which comprise convertible notes and share options granted to employees.
(p) New standards and interpretations not yet adopted
The following standards, amendments to standards and interpretations have been identified as those which may impact the entity in the period of initial application. They are available for early adoption at 30 June 2008, but have not been applied in preparing this financial report:
- Revised AASB 3 Business Combinations changes the application of acquisitions accounting for business combinations and the accounting for non-controlling (minority) interests. Key changes include: the immediate expensing of all transaction costs; measurement of contingent consideration at acquisition date with subsequent changes through the income statement; measurement of non-controlling (minority) interests at full value or the proportionate share of the fair value of the underlying net assets; guidance on issues such as reacquired rights and vendor indemnities; and the inclusion of combinations by contract alone and those involving mutuals. The revised standard becomes mandatory for the Group’s 30 June 2010 financial statements. The Group has not yet determined the potential effect of the revised standard on the Group’s financial report.
45
==> picture [596 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
Notes to the Financial Statements
For the year ended 30 June 2008
(p) New standards and interpretations not yet adopted (continued)
-
AASB 8 Operating Segments introduces the “management approach” to segment reporting. AASB 8, which becomes mandatory for the Group’s 30 June 2010 financial statements, will require the disclosure of segment information based on the internal reports regularly reviewed by the Group’s Chief Operating Decision Maker in order to assess each segment’s performance and to allocate resources to them. Currently the Group presents segment information in respect of its business and geographical segments (see note 6). The Group has not yet determined the potential effect of the revised standard on the Group’s financial report.
-
Revised AASB 101 Presentation of Financial Statements introduces as a financial statement (formerly “primary” statement) the “statement of comprehensive income”. The revised standard does not change the recognition, measurement or disclosure of transactions and events that are required by other AASBs. The revised AASB 101 will become mandatory for the Group’s 30 June 2010 financial statements. The Group has not yet determined the potential effect of the revised standard on the Group’s disclosures.
-
Revised AASB 123 Borrowing Costs removes the option to expense borrowing costs and requires that an entity capitalise borrowing costs directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying asset as part of the cost of that asset. The revised AASB 123 will become mandatory for the Group’s 30 June 2010 financial statements and will constitute a change in accounting policy for the Group. In accordance with the transitional provisions the Group will apply the revised AASB 123 to qualifying assets for which capitalisation of borrowing costs commences on or after the effective date. The Group has not yet determined the potential effect of the revised standard on future earnings.
-
Revised AASB 127 Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements changes the accounting for investments in subsidiaries. Key changes include: the remeasurement to fair value of any previous/retained investment when control is obtained/lost, with any resulting gain or loss being recognised in profit or loss; and the treatment of increases in ownership interest after control is obtained as transactions with equity holders in their capacity as equity holders. The revised standard will become mandatory for the Group’s 30 June 2010 financial statements. The Group has not yet determined the potential effect of the revised standard on the Group’s financial report.
-
AASB 2008-1 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standard - Share-based Payment: Vesting Conditions and Cancellations changes the measurement of share-based payments that contain non-vesting conditions. AASB 2008-1 becomes mandatory for the Group’s 30 June 2010 financial statements. The Group has not yet determined the potential effect of the amending standard on the Group’s financial report.
4. dETERMINATION OF FAIR VALUES
A number of the Group’s accounting policies and disclosures require the determination of fair value, for both financial and non-financial assets and liabilities. Fair values have been determined for measurement and/or disclosure purposes based on the following methods. Where applicable, further information about the assumptions made in determining fair values is disclosed in the notes specific to that asset or liability.
(i) Equity investments
The fair value of financial assets at fair value through profit or loss and available-for-sale financial assets is determined by reference to their quoted bid price at the reporting date.
(ii) Other receivables, trade and other payables
Other receivables, trade and other payables are short term in nature. As a result, the fair value of these instruments is considered to approximate its fair value.
46
Annual Report 2008
4. dETERMINATION OF FAIR VALUES (continued)
(iii) Loans and borrowings
The fair value of interest bearing borrowings is estimated as the present value of the future cashflows discounted at the market rate of interest at the reporting date.
(iv) Share-based payment transactions
The fair value of employee options is measured using the Black-Scholes formula. Measurement inputs include share price on measurement date, exercise price of the instrument, expected volatility (based on weighted average historic volatility adjusted for changes expected due to publicly available information), weighted average expected life of the instruments (based on historical experience and general option holder behaviour), expected dividends, and the risk-free interest rate (based on government bonds). Service and non-market performance conditions attached to the transactions are not taken into account in determining fair value.
5. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT
Overview
This note presents information about the Company’s and Group’s exposure to credit, liquidity and market risks, their objectives, policies and processes for measuring and managing risk, and the management of capital.
The Company and the Group does not use any form of derivatives as it is not at a level of exposure that requires the use of derivatives to hedge its exposure. Exposure limits are reviewed by management on a continuous basis. The Group does not enter into or trade financial instruments, including derivative financial instruments, for speculative purposes.
The Board of Directors has overall responsibility for the establishment and oversight of the risk management framework. Management monitors and manages the financial risks relating to the operations of the Group through regular reviews of the risks.
Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk of financial loss to the Group if a customer or counterparty to a financial instrument fails to meet its contractual obligations, and arises principally from the Group’s receivables from customers and investment securities. For the Company it arises from receivables due from subsidiaries.
Presently, the Group undertakes exploration and evaluation activities exclusively in Australia. At the balance sheet date there were no significant concentrations of credit risk.
Cash and cash equivalents
The Group limits its exposure to credit risk by only investing in liquid securities and only with counterparties that have an acceptable credit rating.
Trade and other receivables
As the Group operates primarily in exploration activities, it does not have trade receivables and therefore is not exposed to credit risk in relation to trade receivables.
The Company and Group have established an allowance for impairment that represents their estimate of incurred losses in respect of loans to subsidiaries and investments. The management does not expect any counterparty to fail to meet its obligations. Other receivables mainly comprise of GST receivables.
47
==> picture [596 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
Notes to the Financial Statements
For the year ended 30 June 2008
5. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (continued)
Credit risk (continued)
Exposure to credit risk
The carrying amount of the Group’s financial assets represents the maximum credit exposure. The Group’s maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting date was:
| Note Other receivables 12 Cash and cash equivalents 11 |
CONSOLIDATED Carrying amount 2008 2007 |
|---|---|
| 82,397 281,381 4,127,494 9,880,637 |
|
| 4,209,891 10,162,018 |
| Note Loans to controlled entities 12 Other receivables 12 |
COMPANY Carrying amount 2008 2007 |
|---|---|
| 13,135,596 4,559,064 52,648 125,292 |
|
| 13,188,244 4,684,356 |
Impairment losses
None of the Group’s and Company’s other receivables are past due (2007: nil). The movement in the allowance for impairment loss on Loans to controlled entities during the year was as follows:
COMPANY
| Note Balance at 1 July 12 Impairment loss recognised 12 Balance at 30 June |
Carrying amount 2008 2007 |
|---|---|
| 1,626,203 1,626,203 (1,626,203) - |
|
| - 1,626,203 |
The impairment loss at 30 June 2008 of $1,626,203 relates to a intercompany loan with Connaught Mining NL, a 100% owned subsidiary of the parent. The intercompany loan was written off in 2008. The allowance accounts in respect of Loans to controlled entities are used to record impairment losses unless the Company is satisfied that no recovery of the amount is possible; at this point the amount is considered irrecoverable and is written off against the financial asset directly.
Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due. The Group’s approach to managing liquidity is to ensure, as far as possible, that it will always have sufficient liquidity to meet its liabilities when due, under both normal and stressed conditions, without incurring unacceptable losses or risking damage to the Group’s reputation.
48
Annual Report 2008
5. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (continued)
Credit risk (continued)
The Group manages liquidity risk by maintaining adequate cash reserves from funds raised in the market and by continuously monitoring forecast and actual cash flows.
The Company anticipates a need to raise additional capital in the next 12 months to meet forecast operational and exploration activities. The decision on how the Company will raise future capital will depend on market conditions existing at that time.
The following are the contractual maturities of financial liabilities, including estimated interest payments and excluding the impact of netting agreements:
==> picture [475 x 337] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Carrying Contractual
CONSOLIDATED amount cash flows <3 months 3-6 mths 6-24 mths >2 years
30 June 2008
Loan and other borrowings 480,000 1,351,945 8,989 8,989 53,928 1,280,039
Trade and other payables 762,759 762,759 762,759 - - -
1,242,759 2,114,704 771,748 8,989 53,928 1,280,039
Carrying Contractual
amount cash flows <3 months 3-6 mths 6-24 mths >2 years
30 June 2007
Loan and other borrowings 480,000 1,243,839 8,989 8,989 53,928 1,171,993
Trade and other payables 1,051,150 1,051,150 1,051,150 - - -
1,531,150 2,294,989 1,060,139 8,989 53,928 1,171,993
Carrying Contractual
COMPANY amount cash flows <3 months 3-6 mths 6-24 mths >2 years
30 June 2008
Trade and other payables 399,060 399,060 399,060 - - -
399,060 399,060 399,060 - - -
Carrying Contractual
amount cash flows <3 months 3-6 mths 6-24 mths >2 years
30 June 2007
Loan and other borrowings 456,876 456,876 - - - 456,876
Trade and other payables 279,592 279,592 279,592 - - -
736,468 736,468 279,592 - - 456,876
----- End of picture text -----
Market risk
Market risk is the risk that changes in market prices, such as foreign exchange rates, interest rates and equity prices will affect the Group’s income or the value of its holdings of financial instruments. The objective of market risk management is to manage and control market risk exposures within acceptable parametres, while optimising the return.
Currency risk
The Group and the Company is not exposed to currency risk and at balance sheet date the Group and the Company holds no financial assets or liabilities which are exposed to foreign currency risk.
Interest rate risk
The Group is exposed to interest rate risk (primarily on its cash and cash equivalents and loans and borrowings), which is the risk that a financial instrument’s value will fluctuate as a result of changes in the market interest rates on interest-bearing financial instruments. The Group does not use derivatives to mitigate these exposures.
The Group adopts a policy of ensuring that as far as possible it maintains excess cash and cash equivalents in high interest bearing accounts.
49
==> picture [596 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
Notes to the Financial Statements
For the year ended 30 June 2008
5. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (continued) Interest rate risk (continued)
Profile
At the reporting date the interest rate profile of the Group’s and the Company’s interest-bearing financial instruments was:
| Variable rate instruments Cash and cash equivalents Fixed rate instruments Loan and borrowings Cash and cash equivalents |
CONSOLIDATED COMPANY Carrying amount Carrying amount 2008 2007 2008 2007 |
|---|---|
| 4,009,811 9,763,637 4,008,651 - - - - 9,688,399 (480,000) (480,000) - - 117,683 117,000 85,683 85,000 |
|
| (362,317) (363,000) 85,683 85,000 |
Financial liabilities consist of an interest bearing loan for $480,000. This loan is held by a 100% subsidiary TNG (NT) and therefore not presented at company level.
Fair value sensitivity analysis for fixed rate instruments
The Group does not account for any fixed rate financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss, therefore a change in interest rates at the reporting date would not affect profit or loss.
A change of 100 basis points in interest rates would have increased or decreased the Group’s equity by $ 3,623 (2007: $3,630) and the Company’s equity by $856 (2007: $850). The group has determined that this is a reasonable shift in interest rates.
Cash flow sensitivity analysis for variable rate instruments
A change of 100 basis points in interest rates at the reporting date would have increased or decreased the Group’s equity and profit or loss by $40,098 (2007: $97,636) and the Company’s equity and profit or loss by $40,086 (2007: $96,884)
Fair value
Fair values versus carrying amounts
The carrying amounts of financial assets and liabilities approximate fair value except for the following balances:
| Consolidated 30 June 2008 Loans and borrowing |
30 JuNE 2008 30 JuNE 2007 Carrying Carrying amount Fair value amount Fair value |
|---|---|
| (480,000) (416,731) (480,000) (392,568) |
|
| (480,000) (416,731) (480,000) (392,568) |
The basis for the assessment of fair values versus carrying value is disclosed in note 4.
50
Annual Report 2008
5. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (continued)
Interest rate risk (continued)
Interest rates used for determining fair value
The interest rates used to discount estimated cash flows for loans and borrowings are based on the rates of similar loan products of the National Australia Bank as follows:
| loan products of the National Australia Bank as follows: | |
|---|---|
| NAB property loan | 2008 2007 |
| 9.46% 8.07% |
Other market price risk
Other equity price risk is the risk that the value of the instrument will fluctuate as a result of changes in market prices (other than those arising from interest rate risk or currency risk), whether caused by factors specific to an individual investment, its issuer or all factors affecting all instruments traded in the market.
Investments are managed on an individual basis and material buy and sell decisions are approved by the Board of Directors. The primary goal of the Group’s investment strategy is to maximise investment returns.
The Group’s investments are solely in listed equity instruments and warrants. Equity instruments are classified as available-for-sale and are carried at fair value with fair value changes recognised directly in equity until derecognised. Warrants are classified as held for trading and are carried at fair value with fair value changes recognised in the income statement.
The following table details the breakdown of the investment assets and liabilities held by the Group and Company:
| Listed equities and warrants Total equity investments |
30 June 2008 30 June 2007 |
|---|---|
| 215,328 617,527 |
|
| 215,328 617,527 |
Sensitivity analysis
The Group’s and the Company’s available for sale equity investments and warrants held for trading are listed on the Australian Stock Exchange. A 5% increase in prices at 30 June 2008 would have increased equity by $21,318 (2007: $61,753) and increased profit and loss by $649 (2007: $5,086); an equal change in the opposite direction would have decreased equity by $21,318 (2007: $61,753) and decreased profit and loss by $20,649 (2007: $19,641). The Group has determined that this is a reasonable shift in the market prices.
Commodity Price Risk
The Group operates primarily in the exploration and evaluation phase and accordingly the Group’s financial assets and liabilities are subject to minimal commodity price risk.
Capital Management
The Group has defined its capital as paid up share capital.
The Group’s objectives when managing capital are to safeguard the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern, so as to maintain a strong capital base sufficient to maintain future exploration and development of its projects. In order to maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Group may return capital to shareholders, issue new shares or sell assets or reduce debt. The Group’s focus has been to raise sufficient funds through equity to fund exploration and evaluation activities.
There were no changes in the Group’s approach to capital management during the year. Risk management policies and procedures are established with regular monitoring and reporting.
Neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries are subject to externally imposed capital requirements.
51
==> picture [596 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
Notes to the Financial Statements
For the year ended 30 June 2008
6. INCOME ANd EXPENSES
| Note (a) Other income Gain on sale of motor vehicle Other income Total Income (b) Net financial income Gain on sale of investments 13 Interest income Net gain on disposal of available for sale investment transferred from equity 13 Change in fair value of investments held-for-trading 13 Impairment loss on available for sale investments 13 Finance income Interest expense Finance expense Net fnance income and expense (c) Corporate and administration expenses Travel and accommodation Directors fees Legal fees Promotional Offce on-charges Contractors and consultancy Occupancy Other Total corporate and administration |
CONSOLIDATED ThE COMPANY 2008 2007 2008 2007 $ $ $ $ |
|---|---|
| - 9,759 - 9,759 - 100,000 - - |
|
| - 109,759 - 9,759 |
|
| - 5,365,674 - 4,363,672 379,732 160,615 379,732 163,418 133,350 - 133,350 (44,371) 1,762,500 (44,371) 1,762,500 (138,161) - (138,161) - |
|
| 330,550 7,288,789 330,550 6,289,590 (38,640) (11,603) (2,603) - |
|
| (38,640) (11,603) (2,603) - |
|
| 291,910 7,277,186 327,947 6,289,590 |
|
| (264,748) (190,521) (241,125) (68,124) (214,400) (166,667) (214,400) (166,667) (376,968) (24,184) (361,638) (19,634) (209,372) (139,314) (201,334) (20,977) 996,251 759,929 996,251 759,929 (443,244) (323,394) (409,244) (219,073) (217,831) (188,174) (217,831) (188,174) (721,618) (639,504) (629,753) (732,280) |
|
| (1,451,930) (911,829) (1,279,074) (655,000) |
The Company invoiced to Thor Mining PlC and Batavia Mining Ltd $996,251 (2007:$759,929) for the reimbursement of office and administration costs during the year.
52
Annual Report 2008
| Note (d) Employment expenses Wages and salaries Other associated personnel expenses Contributions to defned contribution plans Equity settled share- based payment transaction 25 Total employment expenses (e) depreciation and amortisation Depreciation of: Plant and equipment 14 Motor vehicle 14 Leasehold improvements 14 Buildings 14 Total depreciation and amortisation |
CONSOLIDATED ThE COMPANY 2008 2007 2008 2007 $ $ $ $ |
|---|---|
| (700,617) (486,675) (657,880) (440,980) (203,170) (135,672) (203,170) (112,830) (64,463) (59,182) (60,585) (59,182) (908,459) (8,504,073) (908,459) (8,504,073) |
|
| (1,876,709) (9,185,602) (1,830,094) (9,117,065) 161,288 127,858 72,282 47,296 55,562 60,326 - 4,916 62,578 61,154 62,578 61,154 28,717 14,152 - - |
|
| 308,145 263,490 134,860 113,366 |
7. AUdITORS’ REMUNERATION
| Auditors of the Company KPMG Australia: Audit and review of fnancial reports |
CONSOLIDATED ThE COMPANY 2008 2007 2008 2007 $ $ $ $ |
|---|---|
| 77,070 79,472 77,070 79,472 |
53
==> picture [596 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
Notes to the Financial Statements
For the year ended 30 June 2008
8. INCOME TAX
| A reconciliation between tax expense and pre-tax loss: Accouting loss before income tax At the domestic interest tax rate of 30% (2007: 30%) Expenditure not allowed for income tax purposes Provision for non-recovery of loans Share-based payments Gain on distribution and sale of assets Exploration, evaluation and development expenditure Sundry expenses Other non-deductible Tax losses not brought to account Income tax expense reported in the income statement Tax losses Unused tax losses for which no deferred tax asset has been recognised Potential tax beneft @ 30% |
CONSOLIDATED ThE COMPANY 2008 2007 2008 2007 |
|---|---|
(2,421,829) (5,652,091) (2,973,241) (5,674,788) |
|
| (726,549) (1,695,627) (891,972) (1,702,436) - - - - 272,537 2,119,222 272,537 2,119,222 - - - - - - - - - - - - 63,505 - 63,505 - 390,507 (423,595) 555,930 (416,786) |
|
| - - - - |
|
| 15,051,920 7,458,189 15,051,920 7,458,189 |
|
| 4,515,576 2,237,457 4,515,576 2,237,457 |
All unused tax losses were incurred by Australian entities.
Potential future income tax benefits of $4,515,576 (2007: $2,237,457) attributable to tax losses (both consolidated and Parent Entity) have not been brought to account because the Directors do not believe it is appropriate to regard realisation of the future income tax benefits as probable.
The benefits of these tax losses will only be obtained if:
(i) future assessable income is derived of a nature and of an amount sufficient to enable the benefit to be realised;
(ii) the conditions for deductibility imposed by tax legislation continue to be complied with; and
(iii) no changes in tax legislation adversely affect the Company in realising the benefit.
54
Annual Report 2008
| INCOME TAX (continued) Deferred income tax Balance Sheet Deferred income tax relates to the following: Deferred tax liabilities Exploration and evaluation assets Deferred tax assets used to offset deferred tax liabilities Deferred tax assets Tax losses presumed from wholly-owned tax consolidated entities Employee benefts Loans to subsidiaries Deferred tax liabilities used to offset deferred tax assets Future income tax beneft not brought to account - Tax losses not brought to account |
CONSOLIDATED COMPANY 2008 2007 2008 2007 $ $ $ $ |
|---|---|
| 4,364,277 2,062,666 - 117 (4,364,277) (2,062,666) - (117) |
|
| - - - - |
|
| - - (2,793,354) (1,039,262) - (9,855) - (9,855) - - 505,009 - 4,364,277 2,062,666 - 117 - - 2,288,345 1,049,000 |
|
| (4,364,277) (2,052,811) - - |
|
| - - - - |
8. INCOME TAX (continued)
Tax consolidation legislation
TNG Limited and its wholly-owned Australian controlled entities implemented the tax consolidation legislation from 1 July 2003. The accounting policy in relation to this legislation is set out in note 3(b).
The entities have not entered into a tax funding agreement.
55
==> picture [596 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
Notes to the Financial Statements
For the year ended 30 June 2008
9. LOSS PER SHARE
The calculation of basic loss per share for the year ended 30 June 2008 was based on the loss attributable to ordinary shareholders of $2,421,829 (2007: loss $5,652,091) and a weighted average number of ordinary shares on issue during the year ended 30 June 2008 of 188,736,590 (2007: 117,287,857).
Loss attributable to ordinary shareholders
| Loss for the period Loss attributable to ordinary shareholders Weighted average number of ordinary shares Number of ordinary shares at 1 July Effect of shares issued Weighted average number of ordinary shares at 30 June |
2008 2007 $ $ |
|---|---|
| (2,421,829) (5,652,091) |
|
| (2,421,829) (5,652,091) |
|
| 2008 2007 Numbers Numbers |
|
| 182,092,405 100,628,983 6,644,185 16,658,874 |
|
| 188,736,590 117,287,857 |
At balance sheet date the following options were not yet exercised:
==> picture [351 x 94] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Options Exercise date Exercise price [1]
1,500,000 (unlisted) 31 Dec 2011 $0.32
2,600,000 (unlisted) 31 Dec 2011 $0.32
11,500,000 (unlisted) 31 Mar 2010 $0.49
2,500,000 (unlisted) 31 Mar 2010 $0.49
200,000 (unlisted) 01 Nov 2009 $0.75
----- End of picture text -----
1 Subsequent to the balance sheet date the exercise prices have been adjusted in accordance with ASX Listing Rule 7.22.3 due to the capital reduction as a result of the distribution of the investments in Batavia Mining Ltd, Thor Mining PLC and Western Desert Resources Ltd.
Potential ordinary shares are not considered dilutive as their conversion does not show an inferior view of the earnings performance of the Company. Accordingly diluted earnings per share is the same as the basic earnings per share.
56
Annual Report 2008
10. SEGMENT INFORMATION
2008
Since 30 June 2007, the Group had disposed of most of its remaining investments, therefore during the year ended 30 June 2008, the Group operated predominantly in one business segment and in one geographical location. The operations of the Group consists of mineral exploration in Australia.
2007
| 2007 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Primary reporting business segments Revenue External segment revenue Total revenue Result Segment result Gain of associates Unallocated corporate expenses Loss from ordinary activities before income tax Income tax expense Net proft/(loss) Depreciation and amortisation Depreciation Corporate depreciation Assets Segment assets Corporate assets Consolidated total assets Liabilities Segment liabilities Consolidated total liabilities |
Exploration Investments $ $ |
Total $ |
| 97,197 5,538,851 (631,305) (2,967,862) 150,124 11,566,052 617,527 (1,564,000) |
5,636,048 | |
| 5,636,048 | ||
| (3,599,167) 498,660 (2,551,584) |
||
| (5,652,091) - |
||
| (5,652,091) | ||
| 150,124 113,366 |
||
| 263,490 | ||
| 12,183,579 9,492,711 |
||
| 21,676,290 | ||
| (1,564,000) | ||
| (1,564,000) |
57
==> picture [596 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
Notes to the Financial Statements
For the year ended 30 June 2008
| Note 11. CASH ANd CASH EQUIVALENTS Cash Bank short term deposits 12. OTHER RECEIVABLES Current Other receivables GST receivables Non-current Other receivables Loans to controlled entities Impairment loss |
CONSOLIDATED ThE COMPANY 2008 2007 2008 2007 $ $ $ $ |
|---|---|
| 4,009,811 9,763,637 4,008,651 9,688,339 117,683 117,000 85,683 85,000 |
|
| 4,127,494 9,880,637 4,094,334 9,773,339 |
|
| The bank short term deposits, maturing within 90 days and paying interest at a weighted average interest rate of 6.40% at 30 June 2008 (2007: 6.40%). - 84,413 - 70,022 82,397 196,968 52,648 55,270 |
|
| 82,397 281,381 52,648 125,292 |
|
| - - - 4,559,064 - - 13,135,596 1,626,203 - - - (1,626,203) |
|
| - - 13,135,596 4,559,064 |
During 2008 the intercompany loan to Connaught Mining Nl which is a 100% owned subsidiary for $1,683,363 and associated provision of $1,626,203 were written off. The balance of the impairment for $57,160 was recoded as an expense in the profit and loss.
13. OTHER INVESTMENTS
| OTHER INVESTMENTS | |
|---|---|
| Current investments Financial assets held for trading Non-current investments Investments in controlled entities 23 Available-for-sale investments |
6,493 50,864 6,493 50,864 |
| 6,493 50,864 6,493 50,864 |
|
| - - 1,656,323 1,656,323 208,834 566,663 208,834 566,663 |
|
| 208,834 566,663 1,865,157 2,222,986 |
58
Annual Report 2008
13.OTHER FINANCIAL ASSETS (continued)
Available-for sale investments
Available-for-sale investments consist of equity investments in companies listed on the Australian Securities Exchange (“ASX”) and operates in mineral exploration.
2008
| Consolidated and Company Balance at 1 July 2007 Additional investment Disposal (i) Change in fair value Impairment (ii) Balance at 30 June 2008 |
Total $ 566,663 106,050 (210,000) (219,743) (34,136) |
|---|---|
| 208,834 |
-
(i) During the year, 1,050,000 shares in Thor Mining PLC were sold for $210,000. The previously recognised fair value gain in equity of $133,350 has been recycled to the income statement.
-
(ii) Impairment loss on shares totalling $138,161 was recognised in the income statement in 2008 being fair value loss recognised in fair value reserve of $104,025 in the prior year transferred to the income statement in 2008 and $34,136 recognised directly in the income statement in 2008.
2007
| Consolidated Balance at 1 July 2006 Purchase Share of associate profts/(loss) Impairment Change in fair value In-specie distribution Balance at 30 June 2007 Company Balance at 1 July 2006 Purchase Impairment Change in fair value In-specie distribution1 Balance at 30 June 2007 |
4,031,953 1,000,424 498,660 (2,965,091) 5,365,674 (7,364,957) |
|---|---|
| 566,663 | |
| 4,549,450 1,000,424 (1,981,926) 4,363,672 (7,364,957) |
|
| 566,663 |
- 1 At a general meeting in May 2007 TNG received shareholder approval for a capital reduction in the form of a distribution in specie of its holdings in Batavia Mining Ltd and Thor Mining PLC. The effective date of the capital reduction was 29 June 2007.
59
==> picture [596 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
Notes to the Financial Statements
For the year ended 30 June 2008
13. OTHER FINANCIAL ASSETS (continued)
Financial assets held for trading
Investments carried as financial assets held for trading consists of warrants in companies, listed on the Australian Securities Exchange (“ASX”) and the Alternative Investment Market (“AIM”).
| Balance at 1 July Change in fair value In-specie distribution PLANT ANd EQUIPMENT Cost Leasehold improvements Balance at 1 July Additions Disposals Balance at 30 June Plant and equipment Balance at 1 July Additions Disposals Balance at 30 June Motor vehicle Balance at 1 July Additions Disposals Balance at 30 June Land and buildings Balance at 1 July Additions Disposals Balance at 30 June |
CONSOLIDATED ThE COMPANY 2008 2007 2008 2007 $ $ $ $ |
|---|---|
| 50,864 - 50,864 - (44,371) 1,762,500 (44,371) 1,762,500 - (1,711,636) - (1,711,636) |
|
| 6,493 50,864 6,493 50,864 |
|
| 244,617 22,736 244,617 22,736 5,762 244,617 5,762 244,617 - (22,736) - (22,736) |
|
| 250,379 244,617 250,379 244,617 |
|
| 695,969 286,763 369,619 278,813 43,190 409,206 10,751 90,806 - - - - |
|
| 739,159 695,969 380,370 369,619 |
|
| 221,641 38,259 - 38,259 - 221,641 - - (65,014) (38,259) - (38,259) |
|
| 156,627 221,641 - - |
|
| 715,958 - - - - 715,958 - - - - - - |
|
| 715,958 715,958 - - |
14. PLANT ANd EQUIPMENT
60
Annual Report 2008
14. PLANT ANd EQUIPMENT (continued)
| Accumulated Depreciation Leasehold improvements Balance at 1 July Depreciation charge for the year Disposal Balance at 30 June Plant and equipment Balance at 1 July Depreciation charge for the year Disposal Balance at 30 June Motor vehicle Balance at 1 July Depreciation charge for the year Disposal Balance at 30 June Buildings Balance at 1 July Depreciation charge for the year Balance at 30 June Carrying amounts Leasehold improvements At 1 July At 30 June Plant and equipment At 1 July At 30 June Motor vehicle At 1 July At 30 June Land and buildings At 1 July At 30 June Total |
CONSOLIDATED ThE COMPANY 2008 2007 2008 2007 $ $ $ $ |
|---|---|
| 61,154 22,736 61,154 22,736 62,578 61,154 62,578 61,154 - (22,736) - (22,736) |
|
| 123,733 61,154 123,732 61,154 |
|
| 310,663 182,805 226,005 178,708 161,288 127,858 72,282 47,296 (3,310) - (3,312) - |
|
| 468,641 310,663 294,975 226,004 |
|
| 55,410 16,049 - 16,049 55,561 60,326 - 4,916 (32,085) (20,965) - (20,965) |
|
| 78,886 55,410 - - |
|
| 14,152 - - - 28,717 14,152 - - |
|
| 42,869 14,152 - - |
|
| 183,463 - 183,463 - |
|
| 126,647 183,463 126,647 183,463 |
|
| 385,306 103,958 143,615 100,105 |
|
| 270,518 385,306 85,395 143,615 |
|
| 166,231 22,210 - 22,210 |
|
| 77,741 166,231 - - |
|
| 701,806 - - - |
|
| 673,089 701,806 - - |
|
| 1,147,995 1,436,806 212,042 327,078 |
61
==> picture [596 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
Notes to the Financial Statements
For the year ended 30 June 2008
| EXPLORATION, EVALUATION ANd dEVELOPMENT EXPENdITURE Cost Balance At 1 July Exploration expenditure Balance at 30 June Drilling Analysis Sale of tenements Other |
CONSOLIDATED ThE COMPANY 2008 2007 2008 2007 $ $ $ $ |
|---|---|
| 9,433,453 5,098,914 - - 7,552,529 4,334,539 - - |
|
| 16,985,982 9,433,453 - - |
|
| 4,372,070 1,549,108 - - 601,650 161,628 - - (1,058,519) - - - 3,637,328 2,623,803 - - |
|
| 7,552,529 4,334,539 - - |
15. EXPLORATION, EVALUATION ANd dEVELOPMENT EXPENdITURE
The ultimate recoupment of costs carried forward for exploration and evaluation phases is dependent on the successful development and commercial exploitation or sale of the respective areas. At balance date the carrying amount of exploration and evaluation expenditure was $16,985,982 of which $12,833,400 is attributable to the significant exploration of the consolidated entities Manbarrum project, the balance of the carrying value is a result of the Cawse Extended project.
During 2008 tenements with a carrying value of $1,058,519 where sold to Western Dessert Resources Ltd (WDR) for 10 million ordinary shares in WDR valued at $0.20 ($2,000,000). The gain on sale of $941,481 is reflected in the consolidated income statement. These shares were subsequently distributed to shareholders via an in specie distribution on the 13 of September 2007.
62
Annual Report 2008
| CONSOLIDATED | CONSOLIDATED | ThE COMPANY | ThE COMPANY | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||
| $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||
| 16. | TRAdE ANd OTHER PAYABLES | ||||||
| Current | |||||||
| Trade payables | 156,333 | 600,523 |
146,055 | 104,820 | |||
| Miriuwung community payment | 354,723 | - | - | - | |||
| Other | 251,703 | 450,627 |
253,005 | 174,772 | |||
| 762,759 | 1,051,150 |
399,060 | 279,592 | ||||
| 17. | LOANS ANd BORROWINGS | ||||||
| Non-current | |||||||
| Secured bank loan | 480,000 | 480,000 |
- | - | |||
| Other loans – controlled entities | 27(a) | - | - | - | 456,876 | ||
| 480,000 | 480,000 |
- | 456,876 | ||||
| Terms and debt repayment schedule | |||||||
| Terms and conditions of the secured | bank loans were | as follows: | |||||
| CONSOLIDATED | |||||||
| 30 JuNE | 2008 | 30 JuNE 2007 | |||||
| Nominal | |||||||
| interest | Year of | Face | Carrying | Face |
Carrying | ||
| rate | maturity | value | amount | value | amount | ||
| Interest only loan | |||||||
| - Kununurra | 7.28% | 2036 480,000 |
480,000 | 480,000 |
480,000 |
Commencing on the 7 December 2006 the terms of the loan are fixed interest only for a period of 36 months. The loan then reverts to variable rate interest on principal and repayments for the remaining 319 months.
18. PROVISIONS
| Employee provisions Current Balance at 1 July Provisions made/used during the year Balance at 30 June |
CONSOLIDATED ThE COMPANY 2008 2007 2008 2007 $ $ $ $ |
|---|---|
| 32,850 22,013 32,850 22,013 (6,356) 10,837 (6,356) 10,837 |
|
| 26,493 32,850 26,493 32,850 |
63
==> picture [596 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
Notes to the Financial Statements
For the year ended 30 June 2008
| 19. CAPITAL Issued and paid-up share capital |
CONSOLIDATED ThE COMPANY 2008 2007 2008 2007 $ $ $ $ |
|---|---|
| 20,478,198 15,490,639 20,478,198 15,490,639 |
(a) Movements in shares on issue
| Movements in shares on issue | |
|---|---|
| Balance at the beginning of year Share placement In specie distribution1 Options exercised Shares issued to consultants Share issue costs Balance at end of year |
2008 2007 Number $ Number $ |
| 182,092,405 15,490,639 100,628,983 9,346,022 9,090,910 5,000,000 6,000,000 2,340,000 - - - (9,076,593) 1,500,000 256,000 72,463,422 11,742,883 - - 3,000,000 1,440,000 - (268,441) - (301,673) |
|
| 192,683,315 20,478,198 182,092,405 15,490,639 |
- 1 At a general meeting in May 2007 TNG received shareholder approval for a capital reduction in the form of a distribution in specie of its holdings in Batavia Mining Ltd and Thor Mining PLC. The effective date of the capital reduction was 29 June 2007.
Terms and conditions of contributed equity
Holders of ordinary shares are entitled to receive dividends that may be declared from time to time and are entitled to one vote per share at shareholders’ meetings.
In the event of winding up of the Company, ordinary shareholders rank after all other shareholders and creditors and are fully entitled to any proceeds from liquidation.
Effective 1 July 1998, the Company Law Review Act abolished the concept of par value shares and authorised capital. Accordingly, the Company does not have authorised capital or par value in respect of its issued shares.
(b) Options on issue
| Exercise date 30 November 2007 (unlisted) 31 December 2011 (unlisted) 31 March 2010 (unlisted) 1 November 2009 |
Exercise price1 | Number at end of year |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 2007 |
||
| $0.17 $0.32 $0.49 $0.75 |
- 1,500,000 4,100,000 5,100,000 14,000,000 12,500,000 200,000 - |
- 1 Subsequent to the balance sheet date the exercise prices have been adjusted in accordance with ASX Listing Rule 7.22.3 due to the capital reduction as a result of the distribution of the investments in Batavia Mining Ltd, Thor Mining PLC and Western Desert Resources Ltd.
Terms and conditions of options
Share options carry no rights to dividends and no voting rights.
64
Annual Report 2008
19. CAPITAL (continued)
(c) dividends
No dividends were declared or paid during the 2008 financial year.
| No dividends were declared or paid during the 2008 fnancial year. | |
|---|---|
| Dividend franking account 30% franking credits available to shareholders of TNG for subsequent fnancial years |
ThE COMPANY 2008 2007 $ $ |
| 1,008,568 1,008,568 |
The above available amounts are based on the balance of the dividend franking account at year end adjusted for franking credits that the entity may be prevented from distributing in subsequent years.
The ability to utilise the franking credits is dependent upon there being sufficient available profits to declare the dividends.
20. COMMITMENTS
Exploration expenditure commitments
In order to maintain current rights of tenure to exploration tenements, the Company and the Group are required to perform minimum exploration work to meet the minimum expenditure requirements specified by various State governments. These obligations are subject to renegotiation when application for a mining lease is made and at other times. These obligations are not provided for in the financial report.
| Exploration commitments payable not provided for in the fnancial report: Within one year Operating lease commitments Operating lease commitments are payable as follows: Within one year Between one year and 5 years |
CONSOLIDATED ThE COMPANY 2008 2007 2008 2007 $ $ $ $ |
|---|---|
| 2,521,872 3,298,500 - - |
|
| 12,288 - 8,388 - 10,939 - 7,689 - |
|
| 23,227 - 16,077 - |
21. CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
The details and estimated maximum amounts of contingent liabilities that may become payable are set out below. The Directors are not aware of any circumstance or information which could lead them to believe that these liabilities will crystallise and consequently no provisions are included in the financial statements in respect of these matters.
65
==> picture [596 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
Notes to the Financial Statements
For the year ended 30 June 2008
| 21. CONTINGENT LIABILITIES (continued) Litigation Constructive trust claim over the Kanowna Securities. Refer below. Guarantees A guarantee has been provided to support unconditional environmental performance bonds Indemnities1 Total estimated contingent liabilities |
CONSOLIDATED ThE COMPANY 2008 2007 2008 2007 $ $ $ $ |
|---|---|
| 2,146,6872 277,000 2,146,6872 277,000 177,000 117,000 177,000 117,000 |
|
| 2,323,687 394,000 3,277,000 2,323,687 |
- 1 Indemnities have been provided to Directors and certain executive officers of the Company in respect of liabilities to third parties arising from their positions, except where the liability arises out of conduct involving a lack of good faith. No monetary limit applies to these agreements and there are no known obligations outstanding at 30 June 2008.
2 The Commonwealth claims that it is entitled to an amount of $2,146,687 representing a claim of $1,274,000 for the value of the Kanowna Light NL shares and interest thereon since early 2000.
Constructive Trust Claim
Resolution of matters arising from 1998
In the period September to December 1998 management control of TNG was held by interests associated with Davis Samuel Pty Ltd (Davis Samuel). The Davis Samuel nominee Directors committed TNG to a series of transactions involving expenditure totalling $1,526,000. The Australian Stock Exchange Ltd (ASX) ruled that the transactions required shareholder approval. Shareholders subsequently voted against approving the transactions.
In December 1998, TNG entered into a settlement agreement with Davis Samuel and its Directors which effectively provided for the repayment of the funds expended, and TNG would in turn transfer its shares and options in Kanowna Lights Limited (the Kanowna Securities) to Davis Samuel.
The Commonwealth of Australia (the Commonwealth) in proceedings in the Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory claimed that it was entitled to a constructive trust over the Kanowna Securities and obtained an injunction preventing TNG from selling or otherwise disposing of them. The Commonwealth has claimed that as constructive trustee, the Commonwealth claims TNG is liable to account for the market value of the shares at the time they were acquired. The Commonwealth gave an undertaking as to damages.
Subsequently, in September 1999, Davis Samuel purported to rescind the December 1998 Settlement Agreement.
The Commonwealth is on notice that if TNG suffers damages as a result of the Commonwealth’s injunction, and the Commonwealth ultimately fails to prove its constructive trust claim, TNG will claim the damages from the Commonwealth.
The Commonwealth claims that it is entitled to an amount of $2,146,687.29 representing a claim of $1,274,400 for value of the Kanowna Lights NL shares and interest thereon since early 2000.
66
Annual Report 2008
TNG, as a party to the proceedings instituted by the Commonwealth, issued cross-claims against Davis Samuel and several other parties including Messrs Allan Endresz, Peter Cain, William Forge, David Muir and Peter Clark.
TNG is also vigorously defending the Commonwealth claims. It is not possible to predict the likely matter or the timing of an outcome.
Any adverse finding made against TNG which cannot be successfully recovered from cross claims made against other parties may result in TNG being liable to pay up to the amount claimed by the Commonwealth. TNG may also be liable for costs of the proceedings if awarded against it, as well as its own legal cost.
The court proceedings commenced in June 2008 and are currently ongoing.
22. dEEd OF CROSS GUARANTEE
Pursuant to ASIC Class Order 98/1418 (as amended) dated 13 August 1998 the wholly owned subsidiaries listed below are relieved from the Corporations Act 2001 requirements for preparation, audit and lodgement of financial reports and Directors’ reports.
It is a condition of the Class Order that the Company and each of the subsidiaries enter into a Deed of Cross Guarantee. The effect of the Deed is that the Company guarantees to each creditor, payment in full, in the event of winding up of any of the subsidiaries under certain provisions of the Corporations Act 2001. If a winding up occurs under other provisions of the Act 2001, the Company will only be liable in the event that after six months any creditor has not been paid in full. The subsidiaries have also given similar guarantees in the event that the Company is wound up.
The subsidiaries subject to the Deed are Connaught Mining NL and Enigma Mining Limited. In accordance with the terms of the Class Order a consolidated income statement and consolidated balance sheet comprising the entities that are party to the Deed as set out below.
| Income Statement Loss before income tax Income tax beneft Loss after related income tax expense Loss Retained earnings at beginning of year Other reserves Retained earnings at end of year Balance Sheet Cash assets Trade and other receivables Other assets Total current assets |
CONSOLIDATED 2008 2007 $ $ |
|---|---|
| (1,250,362) (5,224,623) |
|
| (1,250,362) (5,224,623) |
|
| (1,250,362) (5,224,623) 4,527,837 2,022,024 (1,153,562) 7,730,436 |
|
| 2,123,913 4,527,837 |
|
| 4,095,411 9,774,434 45,942 125,482 - 23,645 |
|
| 4,141,353 9,923,561 |
67
==> picture [596 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
Notes to the Financial Statements
For the year ended 30 June 2008
| 22. dEEd OF CROSS GUARANTEE (continued) Other fnancial assets Plant and equipment Exploration and evaluation expenditure Total non-current assets Total assets Trade and other payables Provisions Total current liabilities Amounts owing to controlled entity Total non-current liabilities Total liabilities Net assets Issued capital Retained earnings Total equity |
CONSOLIDATED 2008 2007 $ $ |
|---|---|
| 15,309,381 6,381,887 212,042 327,078 3,852,245 3,997,090 |
|
| 19,373,667 10,706,055 |
|
| 23,515,020 20,629,616 |
|
| 395,722 578,290 29,831 32,850 |
|
| 425,553 611,140 |
|
| (51,711) - |
|
| (51,711) - |
|
| 373,842 611,140 |
|
| 21,470,819 20,018,476 |
|
| 21,470,819 15,490,639 1,670,358 4,527,837 |
|
| 23,141,178 20,018,476 |
23. CONSOLIdATEd ENTITIES
| CONSOLIdATEd ENTITIES | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONSOLIDATED | ThE COMPANY | ||||
| 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||
| $ | $ | $ | $ | ||
| Investments in controlled entities | - | - | 2,492,261 | 2,492,261 | |
| Unlisted shares at cost | - | - | (835,938) | (835,938) | |
| Less: impairment | - | - | 1,656,323 | 1,656,323 | |
| Country of | 2008 | 2007 | |||
| Incorporation | % of Ownership | % of Ownership |
|||
| Subsidiaries | |||||
| Connaught Mining NL | Australia | 100 | 100 | ||
| Enigma Mining Limited | Australia | 100 | 100 | ||
| Tennant Creek Gold (NT) Pty Ltd | Australia | 100 | 100 | ||
| Manbarrum Mining Pty Ltd | Australia | 100 | 100 | ||
| TNG Energy Pty Ltd¹ | Australia | 100 | 100 |
1 Direct subsidiary of Enigma Limited
68
Annual Report 2008
| 24. NOTES TO THE STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (a) Reconciliation of cash flows from operating activities Net loss for the period Add/(less) items classifed as investing/ fnancing activities: Gain on sale of tenements Gain on sale of investments Finance Costs Non-refundable deposit on sale of tenements Add/(less) non-cash items: Depreciation and amortisation Write off of plant and equipment Share based payments Impairment in investments Impairment on intercompany loans Share of (proft)/loss in associates Write down in exploration costs Change in assets and liabilities: Increase/(decrease) in current payables, borrowing and provisions (Increase)/decrease in current receivables Net cash used in operating activities |
CONSOLIDATED ThE COMPANY 2008 2007 2008 2007 $ $ $ $ |
|---|---|
| (2,421,829) (5,652,091) (2,973,241) (5,674,788) (941,481) - - - (88,979) (7,128,174) (88,979) (6,126,172) 38,640 - 2,603 - - (50,000) - - 308,145 263,489 134,860 113,367 18,436 - - - 908,457 8,504,073 908,457 8,504,073 138,161 2,965,091 138,161 1,981,926 - - 57,160 - - (498,660) - - - 12,936 - - |
|
| (2,040,449) (1,583,336) (1,820,979) (1,201,594) (103,120) 458,622 163,460 299,915 - (96,575) - 11,207 |
|
| (2,143,569) (1,221,289) (1,657,521) (890,472) |
69
==> picture [596 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
Notes to the Financial Statements
For the year ended 30 June 2008
25. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
| EMPLOYEE BENEFITS | |
|---|---|
| Note Aggregate liability for employee benefts, including on-costs Current Employee benefts provision 18 |
CONSOLIDATED ThE COMPANY 2008 2007 2008 2007 $ $ $ $ |
| 26,493 32,850 26,493 32,850 |
Defined contribution superannuation funds
The Group made contributions to the employees’ nominated superannuation funds. The amount recognised as an expense was $59,182 for the financial year ended 30 June 2008 (2007: $14,782).
Share-based payments
Summary of options over unissued ordinary shares granted.
The following share-based payment arrangements are in existence:
==> picture [475 x 143] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Exercise
Options price Fair value Vesting
series Number Not vested Grant date Expiry date $ $ date
2 1,700,000 - 5 April 2007 31 Dec 2011 $0.38 $0.289 -
2 1,200,000 1,200,000 5 April 2007 31 Dec 2011 $0.38 $0.289 31 Dec 2008
2 1,200,000 1,200,000 5 April 2007 31 Dec 2011 $0.38 $0.289 31 Dec 2009
3 10,000,000 - 19 June 2007 31 May 2010 $0.50 $0.394 -
4 2,500,000 - 27 June 2007 31 May 2010 $0.50 $0.740 -
5 200,000 - 26 Nov 2007 1 Nov 2009 $0.75 $0.190 -
6 1,500,000 - 13 Nov 2007 31 Mar 2010 $0.49 $0.190 -
----- End of picture text -----
The fair value of equity share options granted is estimated at the issue date using the Black-Scholes model, taking into account the terms and conditions upon which the options are granted. The following table lists the inputs to the model used for the years ended 30 June 2008.
==> picture [475 x 124] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Grant date 5 April 2007 19 June 2007 27 Jun 2007 26 Nov 2007 13 Nov 2007
- - - - -
Dividend yield
Underlying security spot price $0.42 $0.65 $1.05 $0.50 $0.40
Exercise price $0.38 $0.50 $0.50 $0.75 $0.49
Standard deviation of returns 80.00% 80.00% 80.00% 80.00% 80.00%
Risk free rate 6.09% 6.48% 6.42% 6.45% 6.71%
Expiration period 4-7 years 2-8 years 2-8 years 1-9 years 2-3 years
Black Scholes valuation $0.289 $0.394 $0.740 $0.190 $0.190
----- End of picture text -----
70
Annual Report 2008
25. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS (continued)
| CONSOLIDATED ThE COMPANY Note 2008 2007 2008 2007 $ $ $ $ Employee expenses Share options granted in 2007 equity settled 580,972 8,504,073 580,972 8,504,073 Share options granted in 2008 equity settled 327,487 - 327,487 - Total expense recognised as employee costs 6(d) 908,459 8,504,073 908,459 8,504,073 CONSOLIDATED COMPANY 2008 2007 2008 2007 Numbers Numbers Numbers Numbers Share-based payments Employee options granted 2,325,872 4,749,871 5,634,498 2,325,872 Consultant options granted 6,195,977 2,314,202 2,750,020 6,195,977 Total share-based payment 8,521,849 7,064,073 8,384,518 8,521,849 The number and weighted average exercise prices of share options is as follows: Consolidated and Company |
CONSOLIDATED ThE COMPANY Note 2008 2007 2008 2007 $ $ $ $ Employee expenses Share options granted in 2007 equity settled 580,972 8,504,073 580,972 8,504,073 Share options granted in 2008 equity settled 327,487 - 327,487 - Total expense recognised as employee costs 6(d) 908,459 8,504,073 908,459 8,504,073 CONSOLIDATED COMPANY 2008 2007 2008 2007 Numbers Numbers Numbers Numbers Share-based payments Employee options granted 2,325,872 4,749,871 5,634,498 2,325,872 Consultant options granted 6,195,977 2,314,202 2,750,020 6,195,977 Total share-based payment 8,521,849 7,064,073 8,384,518 8,521,849 The number and weighted average exercise prices of share options is as follows: Consolidated and Company |
CONSOLIDATED ThE COMPANY 2008 2007 2008 2007 $ $ $ $ |
CONSOLIDATED ThE COMPANY 2008 2007 2008 2007 $ $ $ $ |
CONSOLIDATED ThE COMPANY 2008 2007 2008 2007 $ $ $ $ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 580,972 8,504,073 580,972 8,504,073 327,487 - 327,487 - |
||||
| 908,459 8,504,073 908,459 8,504,073 |
||||
| CONSOLIDATED COMPANY 2008 2007 2008 2007 Numbers Numbers Numbers Numbers |
||||
| 2,325,872 4,749,871 5,634,498 2,325,872 6,195,977 2,314,202 2,750,020 6,195,977 |
||||
| 8,521,849 7,064,073 8,384,518 8,521,849 |
||||
| Weighted average exercise price 2008 |
Number of options 2008 |
Weighted average exercise price 2007 |
Number of options 2007 |
|
| Outstanding at 1 July | $0.49 19,100,000 $0.15 14,900,000 |
|||
| Forfeited during the period | $0.38 (1,000,000) - - |
|||
| Exercised during the period | $0.17 (1,500,000) $0.15 (15,900,000) |
|||
| Granted during the period | $0.52 1,700,000 $0.47 20,100,000 |
|||
| Outstanding during the period | $0.52 18,300,000 $0.49 19,100,000 |
|||
| Exercisable at 30 June | $0.49 15,900,000 $0.50 14,500,000 |
The options outstanding at 30 June 2008 have an exercise price in the range of $0.38 to $0.75 and a weighted average contractual life of 3.29 years.
Options granted to Directors are disclosed under Note 26.
71
==> picture [596 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
Notes to the Financial Statements
For the year ended 30 June 2008
26. KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL dISCLOSURES
(a) details of key management personnel
Directors
John W Barr (Chairman) Neil G Biddle (Managing Director) Michael P Bowen (Non-Executive Director) Paul E Burton (Exploration Director) Edward J Fry (Non-Executive Director) Terence N Smith (Non-Executive Director)
Executives
Damian P Delaney (Company Secretary) – resigned 30 May 2008 Scott L Rauschenberger (Financial Controller) – appointed 19 November 2007
(b) Compensation of key management personnel
Compensation by category
| Compensation by category | |
|---|---|
| Note Key Management Personnel Short-term Post-employment Share-based payments |
CONSOLIDATED ThE COMPANY 2008 2007 2008 2007 $ $ $ $ |
| 944,405 842,500 944,405 842,500 56,516 23,932 56,516 23,932 289,036 4,600,267 289,036 4,600,267 |
|
| 1,289,957 5,466,699 1,289,957 5,466,699 |
Information regarding individual Directors and executives compensation and some equity disclosure as permitted by Corporations Regulation 2M.3.03 and 2M.6.04 is provided in the Remuneration Report section of the Directors’ Report.
72
Annual Report 2008
26. KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL dISCLOSURES (continued)
(c) Equity instruments
All options refer to options over ordinary shares of TNG, which are exercisable on a one for one basis as approved by shareholders.
Options and rights over equity instruments
During the reporting period, the following options over ordinary shares were granted to Directors and executives and approved by shareholders.
The movement during the reporting period in the number of options over ordinary shares in TNG held, directly, indirectly or beneficially, by each key management personnel, including their personally-related entities, is as follows:
Movements in options
==> picture [475 x 198] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Vested Vested and
held at Granted as Other held at during the exercisable at
1 July 2007 remuneration changes [1] Exercised 30 June 2008 year 30 June 2008
Directors
John W Barr 3,000,000 - - - 3,000,000 - 3,000,000
Neil G Biddle 3,000,000 - - - 3,000,000 - 3,000,000
Michael P Bowen 2,000,000 - - - 2,000,000 - 2,000,000
Edward J Fry 1,500,000 1,500,000 - (1,500,000) 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000
Terence N Smith 2,000,000 2,000,000 - 2,000,000
Executives
Damian P Delaney [1] 1,500,000 - (1,500,000) - - - -
Paul E Burton 1,500,000 - - - 1,500,000 500,000 1,000,000
Scott L Rauschenberger [2] - - - - - -
----- End of picture text -----
- 1 Damian Delaney resigned as CFO on the 30 May 2008. Accordingly the disclosure on Mr Delaney’s options are not disclosed after that date. 1,000,000 of his unvested options were cancelled. 500,000 options have vested and are exercisable.
2 Scott Rauschenberger was appointed Financial Controller on the 19 November 2007
No amounts remain unpaid on the options exercised during the financial year at year end.
==> picture [475 x 173] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Vested Vested and
held at Granted as Other held at during the exercisable at
1 July 2006 remuneration changes [3] Exercised 30 June 2007 year 30 June 2007
Directors
John W Barr 5,099,999 3,000,000 (1,830,999) (3,269,000) 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000
Neil G Biddle 7,669,642 3,000,000 (1,140,000) (6,529,642) 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000
Michael P Bowen 2,185,088 2,000,000 (2,185,088) 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000
Edward J Fry [1] - 1,500,000 - - 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000
Terence N Smith 3,510,087 2,000,000 (260,087) (3,250,000) 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000
Executives
Damian P Delaney 1,400,000 1,500,000 - (1,400,000) 1,500,000 - -
Paul Burton [2] - 1,500,000 - - 1,500,000 500,000 500,000
----- End of picture text -----
-
1 Resigned 30 September 2005
-
2 Resigned 3 January 2006
-
3 All other changes during the year were disposals off market at published market rates at the date of the transaction
73
==> picture [596 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
Notes to the Financial Statements
For the year ended 30 June 2008
26. KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL dISCLOSURES (continued)
(c) Equity instruments (continued)
Equity holdings and transactions
The movement during the reporting period in the number of ordinary shares of TNG held, directly, indirectly or beneficially, by each key management personnel, including their personally-related entities is as follows:
==> picture [475 x 198] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Received
held at on exercise held at
1 July 2007 Purchases of options Sales Other 30 June 2008
Directors
John W Barr 11,120,000 - - (3,640,000) - 7,480,000
Neil G Biddle 10,356,625 - - (3,200,000) - 7,156,625
Michael P Bowen 3,265,090 - - - - 3,265,090
Edward J Fry 426,785 - 1,500,000 50,000 - 1,876,785
Terence N Smith 5,272,710 - - - - 5,272,710
Executives
Damian P Delaney 1,470,000 49,000 - (79,000) (1,440,000) [1] -
Paul E Burton - 80,000 - - - 80,000
Scott L Rauschenberger - - - - - -
----- End of picture text -----
1 Damian Delaney resigned as CFO on the 30 May 2008. Accordingly the disclosure of his equity holding is not disclosed after that date.
==> picture [476 x 173] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Received
held at on exercise held at
1 July 2006 Purchases of options Sales Other 30 June 2007
Directors
John W Barr 8,700,000 500,000 3,269,000 (1,469,000) 120,000 11,120,000
Neil G Biddle 5,761,868 2,790,250 6,529,642 (5,125,135) 400,000 10,356,625
Michael P Bowen 750,002 - 2,185,088 - 330,000 3,265,090
Edward J Fry [1] - 26,785 - - 400,000 426,785
Terence N Smith 1,600,000 22,710 3,250,000 - 400,000 5,272,710
Executives
Damian P Delaney [3] - - 1,400,000 - 70,000 1,470,000
Paul Burton [2] - - - - - -
----- End of picture text -----
- 1 Resigned 30 September 2005
2 Resigned 3 January 2006
3 Appointed Company Secretary 4 November 2005
No shares were granted to key management personnel during the reporting period in 2007 and 2008. No shares were held by related parties of key management personnel.
74
Annual Report 2008
(d) Other transactions with key management personnel
A number of key management personnel, or their personally-related entities, hold positions in other entities that result in them having control or significant influence over the financial or operating policies of those entities.
A number of these entities transacted with the Company or its subsidiaries in the reporting period. Their terms and conditions of those transactions were no more favourable than those available, or which might reasonably be expected to be available, on similar transactions to unrelated entities on an arm’s length basis.
The aggregate amounts recognised during the year relating to specified key management personnel and their personally-related entities, were total revenue of $Nil and total net expense after reimbursement of office costs of $78,735 (2007: $93,958). Details of the transactions are as follows:
==> picture [475 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
2008 2007
Specified Directors Transaction Note $ $
Neil G Biddle Corporate charters (i) 26,540 31,700
Michael P Bowen Legal fees (ii) 52,195 62,258
----- End of picture text -----
-
(i) The Company used the services of Hannan Street Corporate Charters, an entity of which Mr Neil G Biddle is a related party.
-
(ii) The Company used the legal services of Hardy Bowen Lawyers, a legal firm of which Mr Michael P Bowen is a partner.
Amounts were billed based on normal market rates for such services and were due and payable under normal payment terms.
27. NON KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL dISCLOSURES
(a) Wholly owned Group transactions
Details of interests in wholly owned controlled entities are set out in Note 23. Details of these dealings are set out below.
Loans
Loans between entities in the wholly owned Group are non-interest bearing, unsecured and are repayable upon reasonable notice having regard to the financial stability of the Company.
Transactions
| Transactions | |
|---|---|
| Balances with entities in the wholly-owned Group Receivable – non current Provision for non recovery Payables – non current |
ThE COMPANY 2008 2007 $ $ |
| 13,135,596 1,626,203 - (1,626,203) |
|
| 13,135,596 - |
|
| - (456,876) |
75
==> picture [596 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
Notes to the Financial Statements
For the year ended 30 June 2008
27. NON KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL dISCLOSURES (continued)
(b) Other related party transactions
The Company invoiced related entities $996,251 (2007: $759,929) for the reimbursement of office and administration costs during the year.
Joint venture operations
The joint venture makes the results of its research and development activities available to the Group as well as to one of the other joint venturers. No amount is paid by any of the venturers. From time to time, to support the activities of the joint venture, the venturers increase their investment in the joint venture.
==> picture [475 x 98] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Consolidated
Interest Exploration expenditure
Principal 2008 2007 2008 2007
Joint venture party Joint venture activities % % $ $
Norilsk Nickel Cawse Extended Nickel/Cobalt 20% 20% - -
Mines and Resources Kintore East Gold 23.75% 23.75% - -
Australia Pty Ltd
----- End of picture text -----
Exploration expenditure represents direct expenditure incurred by the Group.
TNG Limited and Western Desert Resources (“WDR”), have entered into an agreement to joint venture a portfolio of non-core mineral exploration projects in the Northern Territory.
Under the agreement, WDR subsidiaries can earn up to an 80% interest in the Rover, Goddard and Musgrave Prospects by funding exploration expenditure totaling A$4 million across the project group. A summary of the expenditure required and the earn-in profile is set out below:
In addition TNG will not be required to make any further financial contributions in respect of its interest in each of the Prospects until the successful completion of a Bankable Feasibility Study.
==> picture [475 x 82] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Prospect Expenditure to earn 51% Expenditure to earn further 29% TOTAL
Rover 500,000 850,000 1,350,000
Goddards 250,000 400,000 650,000
Musgrave 750,000 1,250,000 2,000,000
Total $1,500,000 $2,500,000 $4,000,000
----- End of picture text -----
Certain time periods have been set for WDR to earn in to the prospects. To earn the initial 51% interest, WDR must spend the amounts above for the respective prospects within 18 months of date of grant of the tenements which is yet to be finalised, at which point a Joint Venture arrangement will come into existence. WDR then has a further 30 months from date of incorporation of the Joint Venture to spend the tabulated amounts to earn up to an 80% interest in the tenements.
76
Annual Report 2008
28. EVENTS SUBSEQUENT TO BALANCE dATE
Change of Directorship
Paul Burton was appointed Director on the 11th July 2008
Davis Samuel
The court hearing in relation to the Davis Samuel case recommenced in August 2008, proceedings are still ongoing.
Rights Issue
On the 15th of August 2008 TNG issued new shares as part of a rights issue. The pro rata offer was on the basis of 1 share for every 4 shares held at the record date each at an issue price of $0.06. The issue of 48,170,734 shares raised $2,890,250 before costs.
Private Placement
Due to strong demand for the shortfall from the rights issue the Company completed a private placement on
1 September 2008. A total of 17,200,934 shares raising $1,032,056 were issued at $0.06 each.
77
==> picture [596 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
Directors’ Declaration
1. In the opinion of the directors of TNG Limited (the “Company”):
-
(a) the financial statements and notes and the remuneration disclosures that are contained in the Remuneration report in the Directors’ report, set out on pages 20 to 27, are in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, including:
-
(i) giving a true and fair view of the Company’s and Group’s financial position as at 30 June 2008 and of their performance, for the financial year ended on that date; and
-
(ii) complying with Accounting Standards (including the Australian Accounting Interpretations) and Corporation Regulations 2001;
-
-
(b) the financial report also complies with International Financial Reporting standards as disclosed in note 2 (a)
-
(c) the remuneration disclosures that are contained in the Remuneration report in the Directors’ report comply with Australian Accounting Standard AASB 124 Related Party Disclosures, the Corporations Act 2001 and the Corporations Regulations 2001; and
-
(d) there are reasonable grounds to believe that the Company will be able to pay its debts as and when they become due and payable.
2. There are reasonable grounds to believe that the Company and the controlled entities identified in note 23 will be able to meet any obligation or liabilities to which they are or may become subject to by virtue of the Deed of Cross Guarantee between the Company and the controlled entities pursuant to ASIC Class Order 98/1418.
3. This declaration is made after receiving the declarations required to be made to Directors by the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer in accordance with section 295A of the Corporations Act 2001 for the financial year ended 30 June 2008.
Signed in accordance with the resolution of the Directors:
==> picture [132 x 63] intentionally omitted <==
John W Barr Chairman
Dated at Perth 25 September 2008
78
Annual Report 2008
Independent Audit Report to members of TNG Limited
==> picture [494 x 43] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [494 x 606] intentionally omitted <==
79
==> picture [596 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
Independent Audit Report to members of TNG Limited (continued)
==> picture [494 x 597] intentionally omitted <==
80
Annual Report 2008
ASX Additional Information
Additional information required by the Australian Stock Exchange Limited Listing Rules and not disclosed elsewhere in this report is set out below.
Shareholdings (as at 22 September 2008)
Substantial shareholders
Substantial holders in the Company are set out below:
==> picture [421 x 34] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Shareholder Number Percentage
HSBC Custody Nominees (Aust) Ltd 21,020,338 8.15%
----- End of picture text -----
Class of shares and voting rights
-
(a) at meetings of members or classes of members each member entitled to vote may vote in person or by proxy or attorney; and
-
(b) on a show of hands every person present who is a member has one vote, and on a poll every person present in person or by proxy or attorney has one vote for each ordinary share held.
On-market buy-back
There is no current on-market buy-back.
Distribution of equity securities as at 29 August 2008
==> picture [204 x 110] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Category Ordinary shares
1 – 1,000 60,445
1,001 – 5,000 1,528,231
5,001 – 10,000 2,990,190
10,001 – 100,000 30,499,754
100,001 and over 177,620,233
212,698,853
----- End of picture text -----
The number of shareholders holding less than a marketable parcel is 430.
81
==> picture [596 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
Twenty largest shareholders as at 22 September 2008
==> picture [495 x 399] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Number Percentage
Name of shares held of shares held (%)
HSBC Custody Nominees (Aust) Ltd 21,020,338 8.15
ANZ Nominees Ltd 10,878,969 4.22
CBH Resources Limited 10,000,000 3.88
CBH Resources Limited 6,194,065 2.40
Biddle Partners Pty Ltd 5,044,843 1.95
Mr Warren W Brown & Mrs M Brown 5,000,000 1.94
WWB Investments Pty Ltd 4,999,999 1.94
Mrs Megan Brouwer 4,525,000 1.75
Mr Terry Lillis 4,163,258 1.61
Bouchi Pty Ltd 4,081,362 1.58
Mr Alistair Wansbone Mackie 4,062,500 1.57
Colbern Fiduciary Nominees Pty Ltd 3,411,731 1.32
Kensington Consulting Pty Ltd 3,121,563 1.21
Bracken Services Pty Ltd 3,000,000 1.16
Shared Portfolio Strategy Pty Ltd 3,000,000 1.16
Foreign Dimensions Pty Ltd 2,789,075 1.08
Ms Carlene Kendall Walker 2,750,000 1.07
Bond Street Custodians Limited 2,737,907 1.06
Ashton Drilling Services Pty Ltd 2,500,000 0.97
Teas Nominees Pty Ltd 2,500,000 0.97
----- End of picture text -----
82
Annual Report 2008
The Group holds an interest in the following tenements or tenement applications:
==> picture [495 x 363] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Prospect Tenements Equity
Warramunga Project ELA25581, ELA25582, ELA25587, Joint Venture
EL24471, MLC647
Burt Range Shelf E80/3772 (Application) 100%
Carlton Shelf E80/3816 (Application) 100%
Cawse Extended M24/547, M24/548, M24/549, M24/550 20% free carried to production, or can be
converted to a 2% net smelter return on
ore mined. Unicorn Pit is now excised and
a wet tonne royalty applies.
Croker Island Project ELA24640, ELA26049 100%
Goddard’s Copper ELA24260 Joint Venture
Prospect
Kintore East P16/2370, P16/2371, P16/2372, P16/2373, Diluting from 49% to 2% gold return
P162374, P16/2459 interest on production. Current percentage
interest is 23.75%.
Manbarrum A24518, EL24395, EL25646, EL25470 100%
McTavish M40/77, M40/119, M40/157, M40/194, 3% gross royalty (third party retains a 25%
M40/1001, M40/1002 interest in TNG’s interest)
Melville Island Bauxite ELA24628 100%
Project
Mt Peake EL23271, EL23074 100%
Peterman Ranges ELA26383, ELA25564, ELA26384, Joint Venture
ELA25562, ELA26382
----- End of picture text -----
Legend
A: Authorisation (equivalent or Exploration Licence) E: Exploration EL: Exploration Licence ELA: Exploration Licence Application M: Mining MLC: Mineral Land Council P: Prospecting
83
==> picture [596 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
Unlisted options
| Unlisted options | Unlisted options |
|---|---|
| unlisted options exercisable @ $0.50 expiring 31 March 2010 | |
| Total on issue | 14,500,000 |
| Number of holders | 8 |
| Holders with 20% or more: | |
| Kensington Consulting Pty Ltd | 3,000,000 |
| Hatched Creek Pty Ltd | 3,000,000 |
| unlisted options exercisable @ $0.38 expiring 31 December 2011 | |
| Total on issue | 4,100,000 |
| Number of holders | 5 |
| Holders with 20% or more: | |
| Paul E Burton | 1,500,000 |
| Simon Dorling | 1,500,000 |
| unlisted options exercisable @ $0.75 expiring 1 November 2009 | |
| Total on issue | 200,000 |
| Number of holders | 1 |
| Holder with 20% or more: | |
| Macquarie | 200,000 |
| unlisted options exercisable @ $0.15 expiring 31 August 2011 | |
| Total on issue | 500,000 |
| Number of holders | 1 |
| Holder with 20% or more: | |
| SLR Consulting Pty Ltd | 500,000 |
84