Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

TESORO GOLD LTD Governance Information 2021

Sep 23, 2021

65957_rns_2021-09-23_ad17ffd9-1bae-4f4c-be1d-c7638c66848b.pdf

Governance Information

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

==> picture [126 x 74] intentionally omitted <==

TESORO RESOURCES LIMITED ACN 106 854 175 (Company)

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT

This Corporate Governance Statement ( Statement ) is current as at 24 September 2021 and has been approved by the Board of the Company on that date.

This Corporate Governance Statement discloses the extent to which the Company followed the recommendations set by the ASX Corporate Governance Council in the Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations (4[th] Edition) ( Recommendations ) throughout the financial year commencing on 1 July 2020 and to the date of this Corporate Governance Statement.

The Recommendations are not prescriptive, however the Recommendations that have not been followed have been identified and reasons provided for not following them along with what (if any) alternative governance practices the Company adopted in lieu of the recommendation. With the exception of the departures detailed in this Statement, the corporate governance practices of the Company during the reporting period were in accordance with the Recommendations.

Due to the current size and nature of the existing Board and the magnitude of the Company’s operations, the Board does not consider that the Company will gain any benefit from individual Board committees and that its resources would be better utilised in other areas as the Board is of the strong view that at this stage the experience and skill set of the current Board is sufficient to perform these roles. Under the Company’s Board Charter, the duties that would ordinarily be assigned to individual committees are currently carried out by the full Board under the written terms of reference for those committees.

In addition to the information contained in this Statement, the Company’s website at www.tesororesources.com.au contains additional details of its corporate governance practices and procedures.

1

/1257_7

RECOMMENDATIONS (4[TH] EDITION) COMPLY EXPLANATION Principle 1: Lay solid foundations for management and oversight Recommendation 1.1 YES The Company has adopted a Board Charter that sets out the (a) A listed entity should have and disclose a board specific roles and responsibilities of the Board, the Chair and charter which sets out the respective roles and management and includes a description of those matters responsibilities of the Board, the Chair and expressly reserved to the Board and those delegated to management, and includes a description of those management. matters expressly reserved to the Board and those The Board Charter also sets out requirements as to the Board’s delegated to management. composition, the roles and responsibilities of the Chairman and Company Secretary, the establishment, operation and management of Board Committees, Directors’ access to Company records and information, details of the Board’s relationship with management, details of the Board’s performance review and details of the Board’s disclosure policy. A copy of the Company’s Board Charter is available on the Company’s website.

  • Recommendation 1.2 YES A listed entity should: (a) undertake appropriate checks before appointing a director or senior executive or putting someone forward for election as a Director; and

  • (a) provide security holders with all material information in its possession relevant to a decision on whether or not to elect or re-elect a Director.

  • (a) The Company’s Nomination Committee Charter provides guidelines for the appointment and selection of Directors and senior executives and requires the Nomination Committee (or, in its absence, the Board) to ensure appropriate checks (including checks in respect of character, experience, education, criminal record and bankruptcy history (as appropriate)) are undertaken before appointing a person, or putting forward to security holders a candidate for election, as a Director. In the event of an unsatisfactory check, a Director is required to submit their resignation.

  • (b) Pursuant to the Nomination Committee Charter, all material information relevant to a decision on whether or not to elect or re-elect a Director must be provided to security holders in the Notice of Meeting containing the resolution to elect or re-elect a Director.

RECOMMENDATIONS (4TH EDITION) COMPLY EXPLANATION
Recommendation 1.3
A listed entity should have a written agreement with each
Director and senior executive setting out the terms of their
appointment.
YES The Company’s Nomination Committee Charter requires the
Nomination Committee (or, in its absence, the Board) to ensure
that each Director and senior executive is personally a party to a
written agreement with the Company which sets out the terms of
that Director’s or senior executive’s appointment.
The Company has written agreements with each of its current
Directors and senior executives.
Recommendation 1.4
The Company Secretary of a listed entity should be
accountable directly to the Board, through the Chair, on all
matters to do with the proper functioning of the Board.
YES The Board Charter outlines the roles, responsibilities and
accountability of the Company Secretary. In accordance with
this, the Company Secretary is accountable directly to the Board,
through the Chair, on all matters to do with the proper functioning
of the Board.
Recommendation 1.5
A listed entity should:
(a)
have and disclose a diversity policy;
(b)
through its board or a committee of the board set
measurable objectives for achieving gender
diversity in the composition of its board, senior
executives and workforce generally; and
(c)
disclose in relation to each reporting period:
(i)
the measurable objectives set for that
period to achieve gender diversity;
(ii)
the entity’s progress towards achieving
those objectives; and
(iii)
either:
(A)
the respective proportions of men
and women on the Board, in
senior executive positions and
across
the
whole
workforce
(including how the entity has
defined “senior executive” for
these purposes); or
PARTIALLY (a)
The Company has adopted a Diversity Policy which
provides a framework for the Company to establish,
achieve and measure diversity objectives, including in
respect of gender diversity. The Diversity Policy is available
on the Company’s website.
(b)
The Diversity Policy allows the Board to set measurable
gender diversity objectives, if considered appropriate, and
to continually monitor both the objectives if any have
been set and the Company’s progress in achieving them.
(c)
Given the current small size of the Board and Company’s
employee base and operations, the Board does not
presently intend to set measurable gender diversity
objectives. The Board will re-consider this matter as the
business grows.
(i)
the Board recently appointed two new Directors,
one of whom, Ms Kristie Young, is female, reflecting
the Company’s commitment to gender diversity;

RECOMMENDATIONS (4[TH] EDITION)

COMPLY EXPLANATION

RECOMMENDATIONS (4TH EDITION) COMPLY EXPLANATION
(B)
if
the
entity
is
a
“relevant
employer” under the Workplace
Gender Equality Act, the entity’s
most recent “Gender Equality
Indicators”, as defined in the
Workplace Gender Equality Act.
If the entity was in the S&P / ASX 300 Index at the
commencement of the reporting period, the measurable
objective for achieving gender diversity in the composition
of its board should be to have not less than 30% of its
directors of each gender within a specified period.
(ii)
the Board has considered the application of the
measurable diversity objectives and determined,
given the small size of the Company and the Board,
requIring specified objectectives to be met will
unduly limit the Company from applying the
Diversity Policy as a whole and the Company’s
policy of appointing the best person for the job; and
(iii)
the respective proportions of women on the Board,
in senior executive positions and across the whole
organisation are:
Board – 20%
Officers (non-Board) – 100%
Other Employees – 28%
Recommendation 1.6
A listed entity should:
(a)
have and disclose a process for periodically
evaluating the performance of the Board, its
committees and individual Directors; and
(b)
disclose for each reporting period whether a
performance evaluation has been undertaken in
accordance with that process during or in respect
of that period.
YES (a)
The Company’s Nomination Committee (or, in its absence,
the Board) is responsible for evaluating the performance of
the Board, its committees and individual Directors on an
annual basis. It may do so with the aid of an independent
advisor. The process for this is set out in the Performance
Evaluation Policy which is available on the Company’s
website.
(b)
The Company’s Nomination Committee Charter requires
the Company to disclose whether or not performance
evaluations were conducted during the relevant reporting
period. The Company undertook a formal performance
evaluation in respect of the Board as a whole for the
financial year in accordance with the above process. A
formal performance review was not undertaken of
individual directors other than the Managing Director.
RECOMMENDATIONS (4TH EDITION) COMPLY EXPLANATION
Recommendation 1.7
A listed entity should:
(a)
have and disclose a process for evaluating the
performance of its senior executives at least once
every reporting period; and
(b)
disclose for each reporting period whether a
performance evaluation has been undertaken in
accordance with that process during or in respect
of that period.
YES (a)
The Company’s Nomination Committee (or, in its absence,
the Board) is responsible for evaluating the performance of
the Company’s senior executives on an annual basis. The
Company’s Remuneration Committee (or, in its absence,
the Board) is responsible for evaluating the remuneration of
the Company’s senior executives on an annual basis. A
senior
executive,
for
these
purposes,
means
key
management personnel (as defined in the Corporations
Act) other than a non-executive Director.
The applicable processes for these evaluations can be
found in the Company’s Performance Evaluation Policy,
which is available on the Company’s website.
(b)
The Company’s Nomination Committee Charter requires
the Company to disclose whether or not performance
evaluations were conducted during the relevant reporting
period.
The
Company
undertook
a
performance
evaluation in respect of Managing Director, Mr Zeffron
Reeves for the financial year in accordance with the
applicable process.
Principle 2: Structure the Board to be effective and add value
Recommendation 2.1
The Board of a listed entity should:
(a)
have a nomination committee which:
(i)
has at least three members, a majority of
whom are independent Directors; and
(ii)
is chaired by an independent Director,
and disclose:
(iii)
the charter of the committee;
(iv)
the members of the committee; and
YES (a)
The Company does not currently have a Nomination
Committee. The Company’s Nomination Committee
Charter provides for the creation of a Nomination
Committee (if it is considered it will benefit the Company),
with at least three members, a majority of whom are
independent Directors, and which must be chaired by an
independent Director. A copy of the Nomination
Committee Charter can be found on the Company’s
website.

RECOMMENDATIONS (4[TH] EDITION)

(v) as at the end of each reporting period, the number of times the committee met throughout the period and the individual attendances of the members at those meetings; or

(b) if it does not have a nomination committee, disclose that fact and the processes it employs to address Board succession issues and to ensure that the Board has the appropriate balance of skills, knowledge, experience, independence and diversity to enable it to discharge its duties and responsibilities effectively.

COMPLY

EXPLANATION

  • (b) The Company does not have a Nomination Committee as the Board considers that the Company will not currently benefit from its establishment. In accordance with the Company’s Board Charter, the full Board undertakes out the duties that would ordinarily be carried out by the Nomination Committee under the Nomination Committee Charter, including the following processes to address succession issues and to ensure the Board has the appropriate balance of skills, experience, independence and knowledge of the entity to enable it to discharge its duties and responsibilities effectively:

  • (i) devoting time at least annually to discuss Board succession issues and updating the Company’s Board skills matrix; and

  • (ii) all Board members being involved in the Company’s nomination process, to the maximum extent permitted under the Corporations Act and ASX Listing Rules.

  • (iii) ensuring that the Board is comprised of directors who contribute to the successful management of the Company and discharge their duties having regard to the law and the highest standards of corporate governance.

Recommendation 2.2

A listed entity should have and disclose a Board skills matrix setting out the mix of skills that the Board currently has or is looking to achieve in its membership.

YES

Pursuant to the Nomination Committee Charter, the Nomination Committee (or, in its absence, the Board) is required to prepare a Board skills matrix setting out the mix of skills that the Board currently has (or is looking to achieve) and to review this at least annually ensure the Board is comprised of Directors with an appropriate mix of skills to discharge its obligations effectively and to add value and to ensure the Board has the ability to deal with new and emerging business and governance issues.

RECOMMENDATIONS (4[TH] EDITION)

COMPLY

EXPLANATION

The Company has a Board skill matrix setting out the mix of skills and diversity that the Board currently has or is looking to achieve in its membership, which currently includes geological, technical and engineering, project development, commercial, legal and corporate governance, health and safety and risk, financial accounting, capital markets and IR/PR.

The Board undertakes an evaluation of the Board skills matrix on an annual basis to ensure that the Directors collectively have the skills and experience needed to execute the Company’s business strategy and to identify any gaps in the skills and experience of the Board. The Board will then assess all future candidates for Board positions and the performance of its current membership on this basis.

The Board Charter requires the disclosure of each Board member’s qualifications and expertise. Full details as to each Director and senior executive’s relevant skills and experience are available in the Company’s Annual Report.

Recommendation 2.3

A listed entity should disclose:

  • (a) the names of the Directors considered by the Board to be independent Directors;

  • (b) if a Director has an interest, position or relationship of the type described in Box 2.3 of the ASX Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations (4th Edition), but the Board is of the opinion that it does not compromise the independence of the Director, the nature of the interest, position or relationship in question and an explanation of why the Board is of that opinion; and

(c) the length of service of each Director

YES

  • (a) The Board Charter requires the disclosure of the names of Directors considered by the Board to be independent. The Company discloses those Directors it considers to be independent in its Annual Report and on the Company’s website. The Board considers there are currently two independent Directors, Mr John Toll and Ms Kristie Young. Messrs Zeffron Reeves and Linton Putland are not considered independent as they are employed in executive capacities. Mr Geoffrey McNamara is not considered independent as he is a substantial shareholder in the Company.

  • (b) Not applicable.

  • (c) The current Directors were appointed: John Toll – 3 October 2017 Zeffron Reeves – 29 January 2020 Linton Putland – 14 September 2021 Geoffrey McNamara – 29 January 2020

RECOMMENDATIONS (4TH EDITION) COMPLY EXPLANATION
Kristie Young – 14 September 2021
Recommendation 2.4
A majority of the Board of a listed entity should be
independent Directors.
NO The Board comprises a total of 5 directors, only two of whom, Mr
John Toll and Ms Kristie Young, are considered to be independent.
Messrs Zeffron Reeves and Linton Putland are not considered
independent as they are employed in an executive capacity. Mr
Geoffrey McNamara is not considered independent as he is a
substantial shareholder in the Company.
Recommendation 2.5
The Chair of the Board of a listed entity should be an
independent Director and, in particular, should not be the
same person as the CEO of the entity.
YES The Board Charter provides that, where practical, the Chair of the
Board should be an independent Director and should not be the
CEO/Managing Director.
The current Chair of the Company, Mr John Toll, is an independent
Director and is not the CEO/Managing Director.
Recommendation 2.6
A listed entity should have a program for inducting new
Directors and for periodically reviewing whether there is a
need for existing directors to undertake professional
development to maintain the skills and knowledge needed
to perform their role as Directors effectively.
YES In accordance with the Company’s Board Charter, the
Nominations Committee (or, in its absence, the Board) is
responsible for the approval and review of induction and
continuing professional development programs and procedures
for Directors to ensure that they can effectively discharge their
responsibilities. The Company Secretary is responsible for
facilitating inductions and professional development including
receiving briefings on material developments in laws, regulations
and accounting standards relevant to the Company.
Principle 3: Instil a culture of acting lawfully, ethically and responsibly
Recommendation 3.1
A listed entity should articulate and disclose its values.
YES The Company is committed to conducting all of its business
activities fairly, honestly with a high level of integrity, and in
compliance with all applicable laws, rules and regulations. The
Board, management and employees are dedicated to high
ethical standards and recognise and support the Company’s
commitment to compliance with these standards.
The Company’s values are set out in its Code of Conduct and are
available on the Company’s website.
RECOMMENDATIONS (4TH EDITION) COMPLY EXPLANATION
Recommendation 3.2
A listed entity should:
(a)
have and disclose a code of conduct for its
Directors, senior executives and employees; and
(b)
ensure that the Board or a committee of the Board
is informed of any material breaches of that code.
YES (a)
The Company has a Corporate Code of Conduct which
applies to the Company’s Directors, senior executives and
employees.
(b)
The Company’s Corporate Code of Conduct is available
on the Company’s website. Any material breaches of the
Code of Conduct are required to be reported to the Board
or a committee of the Board.
Recommendation 3.3
A listed entity should:
(a)
have and disclose a whistleblower policy; and
(b)
ensure that the Board or a committee of the Board
is informed of any material incidents reported
under that policy.
YES The Company has a Whistleblower Protection Policy which is
available on the Company’s website. Any material breaches of
the Whistleblower Protection Policy are required to be reported to
the Board.
Recommendation 3.4
A listed entity should:
(a)
have and disclose an anti-bribery and corruption
policy; and
(b)
ensure that the Board or committee of the Board is
informed of any material breaches of that policy.
YES (a)
The Company has an Anti-Bribery and Anti-Corruption
Policy which is available on the Company’s website.
(b)
Any material breaches of the Anti-Bribery and Anti-
Corruption Policy are required to be reported to the Board.
Principle 4: Safeguard the integrity of corporate reports
Recommendation 4.1
The Board of a listed entity should:
(a)
have an audit committee which:
(i)
has at least three members, all of whom
are non-executive Directors and a majority
of whom are independent Directors; and
(ii)
is chaired by an independent Director,
who is not the Chair of the Board,
and disclose:
(iii)
the charter of the committee;
YES (a)
The Company’s Audit and Risk Committee Charter
requires the establishment of an Audit and Risk Committee
with at least three members, all of whom must be non-
executive Directors, and a majority of the Committee must
be independent Directors. The Committee must be
chaired by an independent Director who is not the Chair.

RECOMMENDATIONS (4[TH] EDITION)

COMPLY

EXPLANATION

  • (iv) the relevant qualifications and experience of the members of the committee; and

  • (v) in relation to each reporting period, the number of times the committee met throughout the period and the individual attendances of the members at those meetings; or

(b) The Company does not currently have an Audit and Risk Committee as the Board considers the Company will not currently benefit from its establishment. In accordance with the Company’s Board Charter, the Board undertakes the duties that would ordinarily be carried out by the Audit and Risk Committee under the Audit and Risk Committee Charter including the processes to independently verify the integrity of the Company’s periodic reports which are not audited or reviewed by an external auditor, as well as the processes for the appointment and removal of the external auditor and the rotation of the audit engagement partner. The Board will devote time at annual Board meetings to fulfilling the roles and responsibilities associated with maintaining the Company’s internal audit function and arrangements with external auditors. All members of the Board will be involved in the Company’s audit function to ensure the proper maintenance of the entity and the integrity of all financial reporting. The Company’s Audit and Risk Committee Charter requires the CEO and CFO (or, if none, the person(s) fulfilling those functions) to provide a sign off on these terms. The Board ensures that before it approved the entity’s financial statements for a financial period it receives declarations that the financial records of the entity have been properly maintained and that the financial statement comply with the appropriate accounting standards and give a true and fair view of the financial position and performance of the entity and that the opinion has been formed on the basis of a sound system of risk management and internal control which is operation effectively. The Company undertakes the following process to verify the integrity of the information in periodic corporate reports (to the extent that the information contained in the reports are not audited or reviewed by an external auditor):

(b) if it does not have an audit committee, disclose
that fact and the processes it employs that
independently verify and safeguard the integrity of
its corporate reporting, including the processes for
the appointment and removal of the external
auditor and the rotation of the audit engagement
partner.

partner.
maintaining the Company’s internal audit function and
arrangements with external auditors. All members of the
Board will be involved in the Company’s audit function to
ensure the proper maintenance of the entity and the
integrity of all financial reporting.
Recommendation 4.2 YES The Company’s Audit and Risk Committee Charter requires the
The Board of a listed entity should, before it approves the
entity’s financial statements for a financial period, receive
CEO and CFO (or, if none, the person(s) fulfilling those functions)
to provide a sign off on these terms.
from its CEO and CFO a declaration that the financial The Board ensures that before it approved the entity’s financial
records of the entity have been properly maintained and statements for a financial period it receives declarations that the
that the financial statements comply with the appropriate financial records of the entity have been properly maintained and
accounting standards and give a true and fair view of the that the financial statement comply with the appropriate
financial position and performance of the entity and that accounting standards and give a true and fair view of the
the opinion has been formed on the basis of a sound system financial position and performance of the entity and that the
of risk management and internal control which is operating opinion has been formed on the basis of a sound system of risk
effectively. management and internal control which is operation effectively.
Recommendation 4.3 YES The Company undertakes the following process to verify the
A listed entity should disclose its process to verify the
integrity of any periodic corporate report it releases to the
market that is not audited or reviewed by an external
integrity of the information in periodic corporate reports (to the
extent that the information contained in the reports are not
audited or reviewed by an external auditor):
auditor. (i) All periodic corporate reports are initially prepared by the
Company’s technical and accounting teams;
RECOMMENDATIONS (4TH EDITION) COMPLY EXPLANATION
(ii) Draft periodic corporate reports are initially reviewed by
the Managing Director;
(iii) Following Managing Director review, the Company’s Non-
Executive Directors review the draft periodic corporate
reports and are able to interrogate the executive and
Managing Director on the content of periodic corporate
reports;
(iv) The Board receives declarations that the financial records
of the entity have been properly maintained and that the
financial
statements
comply
with
the
appropriate
accounting standards and give a true and fair view of the
financial position and performance of the entity and that
the opinion has been formed on the basis of a sound
system of risk management and internal control which is
operating effectively;
Pursuant to the Board Charter, all Directors have the ability to seek
external advice on the content of periodic corporate reports if
considered necessary.
Principle 5: Make timely and balanced disclosure
Recommendation 5.1
A listed entity should have and disclose a written policy for
complying with its continuous disclosure obligations under
listing rule 3.1.
YES The Company has a Continuous Disclosure Policy, which is
available on the Company’s website.
Recommendation 5.2
A listed entity should ensure that its board receives copies
of all material market announcements promptly after they
have been made.
YES Pursuant to the Company’s Continuous Disclosure Policy, all
members
of
the
Board
will
receive
material
market
announcements promptly after they have been made.
Recommendation 5.3
A listed entity that gives a new and substantive investor or
analyst presentation should release a copy of the
presentation materials on the ASX Market Announcements
Platform ahead of the presentation.
YES All substantive investor or analyst presentations will be released on
the ASX Market Announcement Platform ahead of such
presentations.
RECOMMENDATIONS (4TH EDITION) COMPLY EXPLANATION
Principle 6:Respect the rights of security holders
Recommendation 6.1
A listed entity should provide information about itself and its
governance to investors via its website.
YES Information about the Company and its governance is available
on the Company’s website.
Recommendation 6.2
A listed entity should have an investor relations program
that facilitates effective two-way communication with
investors.
YES The Company has adopted a Shareholder Communications
Strategy which aims to promote and facilitate effective two-way
communication with investors. The Strategy outlines a range of
ways in which information is communicated to shareholders and
is available on the Company’s website.
Recommendation 6.3
A listed entity should disclose how it facilitates and
encourages participation at meetings of security holders.
YES Shareholders are encouraged to participate at all general
meetings and AGMs of the Company via its Notice of Meeting
made available to all shareholders.
Recommendation 6.4
A listed entity should ensure that all substantive resolutions
at a meeting of security holders are decided by a poll
rather than by a show of hands.
YES All substantive resolutions at securityholder meetings will be
decided by a poll rather than a show of hands.
Recommendation 6.5
A listed entity should give security holders the option to
receive communications from, and send communications
to, the entity and its security registry electronically.
YES The Shareholder Communication Strategy provides that security
holders can register with the Company to receive email
notifications when an announcement is made by the Company
to the ASX, including the release of the Annual Report, half yearly
reports and quarterly reports. Links are made available to the
Company’s website on which all information provided to the ASX
is immediately posted.
Shareholders queries should be referred to the Company
Secretary at first instance.
RECOMMENDATIONS (4TH EDITION) COMPLY EXPLANATION
Principle 7: Recognise and manage risk
Recommendation 7.1
The Board of a listed entity should:
(a)
have a committee or committees to oversee risk,
each of which:
(i)
has at least three members, a majority of
whom are independent Directors; and
(ii)
is chaired by an independent Director,
and disclose:
(iii)
the charter of the committee;
(iv)
the members of the committee; and
(v)
as at the end of each reporting period, the
number of times the committee met
throughout the period and the individual
attendances of the members at those
meetings; or
(b)
if it does not have a risk committee or committees
that satisfy (a) above, disclose that fact and the
process it employs for overseeing the entity’s risk
management framework.
YES (a)
The Company does not currently have an Audit and Risk
Committee. The Company has an Audit and Risk
Committee Charter that provides for the establishment of
an Audit and Risk Committee with at least three members,
all of whom must be non-executive Directors, and majority
of the Committee must be independent Directors. The
Committee must be chaired by an independent Director
who is not the Chair.
A copy of the Audit and Risk Committee Charter is
available on the Company’s website.
(b)
The Company does not have an Audit and Risk Committee
as the Board considers the Company will not currently
benefit from its establishment. In accordance with the
Company’s Board Charter, the Board undertakes out the
duties that would ordinarily be carried out by the Audit and
Risk Committee under the Audit and Risk Committee
Charter including the following processes to oversee the
entity’s risk management framework. The Board will
regularly devote time at Board meetings to fulfilling the
roles and responsibilities associated with overseeing risk
and maintaining the entity’s risk management framework
and
associated
internal
compliance
and
control
procedures.
Recommendation 7.2
The Board or a committee of the Board should:
(a)
review the entity’s risk management framework at
least annually to satisfy itself that it continues to be
sound and that the entity is operating with due
regard to the risk appetite set by the Board; and
(b)
disclose in relation to each reporting period,
whether such a review has taken place.
YES (a)
The Audit and Risk Committee Charter requires that the
Audit and Risk Committee (or, in its absence, the Board)
should, at least annually, satisfy itself that the Company’s
risk management framework continues to be sound and
that the Company is operating with due regard to the risk
appetite set by the Board.
RECOMMENDATIONS (4TH EDITION) COMPLY EXPLANATION
(a) The Company’s Audit and Risk Committee Charter requires
the Company to disclose at least annually whether such a
review of the Company’s risk management framework has
taken place. The Board reviews the Company’s risk
management framework at least annually to satisfy itself
that it continues to be sound, to determine whether there
have been any changes in the material business risks the
Company faces and to ensure that the Company is
operating within the risk appetite set by the Board. The
Board carried out these reviews during the Reporting
Period.
Recommendation 7.3
A listed entity should disclose:
(a)
if it has an internal audit function, how the function
is structured and what role it performs; or
(b)
if it does not have an internal audit function, that
fact and the processes it employs for evaluating
and continually improving the effectiveness of its
governance,
risk
management
and
internal
control processes.
YES (a)
The Audit and Risk Committee Charter provides for the
Audit and Risk Committee to monitor and periodically
review the need for an internal audit function, as well as
assessing the performance and objectivity of any internal
audit procedures that may be in place.
(b)
The Company does not have an internal audit function.
The Board considers the processes employed pursuant to
the Audit and Risk Committee Charter and Risk
Management Policy are sufficient for evaluating and
continually
improving
the
effectiveness
of
its
risk
management and internal control processes given the size
and complexity of the current business.
Recommendation 7.4
A listed entity should disclose whether it has any material
exposure to environmental or social risks and, if it does, how
it manages or intends to manage those risks.
YES The Audit and Risk Committee Charter requires the Audit and Risk
Committee (or, in its absence, the Board) to assist management
to determine whether the Company has any potential or
apparent exposure to environmental or social risks and, if it does,
put in place management systems, practices and procedures to
manage those risks.
The Company’s Audit and Risk Committee Charter requires the
Company to disclose whether it has any potential or apparent
exposure to environmental or social risks and, if it does, put in
place management systems, practices and procedures to
manage those risk.
RECOMMENDATIONS (4TH EDITION) COMPLY EXPLANATION
Where the Company does not have material exposure to
environmental or social risks, report the basis for that determination
to the Board, and where appropriate benchmark the Company’s
environmental or social risk profile against its peers.
The Company reported no material exposure to environmental or
social risks in its 2021 Annual Report.
Principle 8: Remunerate fairly and responsibly
Recommendation 8.1
The Board of a listed entity should:
(a)
have a remuneration committee which:
(i)
has at least three members, a majority of
whom are independent Directors; and
(ii)
is chaired by an independent Director,
and disclose:
(iii)
the charter of the committee;
(iv)
the members of the committee; and
(v)
as at the end of each reporting period, the
number of times the committee met
throughout the period and the individual
attendances of the members at those
meetings; or
(b)
if it does not have a remuneration committee,
disclose that fact and the processes it employs for
setting the level and composition of remuneration
for Directors and senior executives and ensuring
that such remuneration is appropriate and not
excessive.
YES (a)
The Company does not have a Remuneration Committee.
The Company’s Remuneration Committee Charter that
provides for the establishment of a Remuneration
Committee (if it is considered it will benefit the Company),
with at least three members, a majority of whom are be
independent Directors, and which must be chaired by an
independent Director.
(a)
The Company does not have a Remuneration Committee
as the Board considers the Company will not currently
benefit from its establishment. In accordance with the
Company’s Board Charter, the Board undertakes the
duties that would ordinarily be carried out by the
Remuneration
Committee
under
the
Remuneration
Committee Charter including devoting time annually to
reviewing and setting the level and composition of
remuneration for Directors and senior executives and
ensuring that such remuneration is appropriate and not
excessive.
Recommendation 8.2
A listed entity should separately disclose its policies and
practices regarding the remuneration of non-executive
Directors and the remuneration of executive Directors and
other senior executives.
YES The Company’s Remuneration Committee Charter requires the
Board to disclose its policies and practices regarding the
remuneration of Directors and senior executives, which is disclosed
in the remuneration report contained in the Company’s Annual
Report.

RECOMMENDATIONS (4[TH] EDITION)

COMPLY EXPLANATION

Recommendation 8.3

A listed entity which has an equity-based remuneration scheme should:

(a)
(b)
have a policy on whether participants are
permitted to enter into transactions (whether
through the use of derivatives or otherwise) which
limit the economic risk of participating in the
scheme; and
disclose that policy or a summary of it.

NO

The Company has an equity-based remuneration scheme, the Incentive Option and Performance Rights Plan, which was approved by shareholders at the 2019 Annual General Meeting. While the Securities Trading Policy prohibits key management personnel from engaging in short term trading of the Company’s securities (except for the exercise of options where the shares will be sold shortly thereafter), due to the Company not currently having any outstanding securities on issue pursuant to the scheme, the Board has not formalised a policy on whether participants are permitted to enter into transactions (whether through the use of derivatives or otherwise) which limit the economic risk of participating in the scheme.

Additional recommendations that apply only in certain cases

Recommendation 9.1 N/A Board meetings are held in English. The Company does not have
A listed entity with a director who does not speak the any non-English speaking Directors, however as set out in the
language in which board or security holder meetings are
held or key corporate documents are written should
disclose the processes it has in place to ensure the director
Company’s Board Charter, should the Company have a non-
English speaking Director, the Company will translate all key
corporate documents for the benefit of the Director. In addition,
understands and can contribute to the discussions at those a translator will be present for all Board and Shareholder meetings.
meetings and understands and can discharge their
obligations in relation to those documents.
Recommendation 9.2 N/A
A listed entity established outside Australia should ensure
that meetings of security holders are held at a reasonable
place and time.
Recommendation 9.3 N/A
A listed entity established outside Australia, and an
externally managed listed entity that has an AGM, should
ensure that its external auditor attends its AGM and is
available to answer questions from security holders relevant
to the audit.