Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

TESORO GOLD LTD Governance Information 2016

Sep 29, 2016

65957_rns_2016-09-29_a42022ec-de23-4ddf-8c7a-1d3061af8dba.pdf

Governance Information

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

PLUKKA LIMITED ABN 91 106 854 175

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT

==> picture [116 x 29] intentionally omitted <==

This Corporate Governance Statement issued by Plukka Limited (“ Company ”) sets out the Company's compliance with the third edition of the ASX Corporate Governance Council's Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations ( Principles and Recommendations ) as at 26 September 2016.

The Board of the Company currently has in place corporate governance policies and charters which have been posted in a dedicated corporate governance information section on the Company's website: www.plukka.com/about-plukka/investor

PRINCIPLES AND RECOMMENDATIONS PRINCIPLES AND RECOMMENDATIONS COMPLY
(Yes/No)
EXPLANATION
1. Lay solid foundations for managementand oversight
1.1 Companies should disclose:
(a) the respective roles and responsibilities of its board and
management; and
(b) those matters expressly reserved to the board and those
delegated to management.
Yes The Board is responsible for overseeing the management of
the Company’s business and the overall corporate
governance. The Board has adopted a written charter to
provide a framework for the effective operation of the
Board, which sets out the Board’s composition, roles and
responsibilities and the relationship and interaction between
the Board and management and the authority delegated
by the Board to management and Board committees.
The Company has also established a clear delineation
between the Board’s responsibility for the Company’s’
strategy and activities, each director of the Company is
bound by the Company's charters and policies which clearly
outlines the roles and responsibilities of Board Members and
management.
Please refer to the Board Charter contained in the Corporate
Governance Statement.
1.2 Companies should:
(a) undertake appropriate checks before appointing a
Yes The Company has developed a Nomination Committee
person, or putting forward to security holders a
candidate for election, as a director; and
(b) provide security holders with all material information in its
possession relevant to a decision on whether or not to
elect or re-elect a director.
Charter to guide the Board in discharging its obligations to
identify and nominate, for the approval of the Board,
candidates to fill Board vacancies as and when they arise,
having regard to the desired composition of the Board and
undertake appropriate checks before appointing a person
or putting forward to shareholders a new candidate for
election, as a director.
The Company provides its security holders with all material
information in its possession relevant to a decision on
whether or not to elect or re-elect a director in accordance
with the Nomination Committee Charter.
Please refer to the Nomination Committee Charter
containedin the Corporate Governance Statement.
1.3 Companies should have a written agreement with each
director and senior executive setting out the terms of their
appointment.
Yes The Company has entered into a written agreement with
each director and senior executive setting out the terms of
their appointment.
Pleaserefer totheNominationCommittee Charter.
1.4 The company secretary should be accountable directly to
the board, through the chair, on all matters to do with the
proper functioning of the board.
Yes The Company Secretary is accountable to the Board,
through the Chairman, on all matters to do with the proper
functioning of the Board. The Company Secretary works
closely with the Chairman to manage the flow of information
between the Board, its committees and Senior Executives.
Please refer to the Board Charter.
1.5 Companies should:
(a) have a diversity policy which includes requirements for
the board or a relevant committee of the board to set
measurable objectives for achieving gender diversity
and to assess annually both the objectives and the
entity’s progress in achieving them;
(b) disclosethatpolicy ora summary of it; and
Yes The Company has adopted a Diversity Policy which can be
viewed on its website. Diversity includes, but is not limited to,
gender, age, ethnicity and cultural background. The
Company is committed to diversity and recognises the
benefits arising from employees and board diversity.
The Diversity Policy outlines the requirements for the Board

2

==> picture [41 x 370] intentionally omitted <==

  • (c) disclose as at the end of each reporting period the measurable objectives for achieving gender diversity set by the board or a relevant committee of the board in accordance with the entity’s diversity policy and its progress towards achieving them and either:

  • (1) the respective proportions of men and women on the board, in senior executive positions and across the whole organisation (including how the entity has defined “senior executive” for these purposes); or

  • (2) if the entity is a “relevant employer” under the Workplace Gender Equality Act, the entity’s most recent “Gender Equality Indicators”, as defined in and published under that Act.

==> picture [65 x 370] intentionally omitted <==

to develop objectives for achieving diversity, and annually assess both the objectives and the progress in achieving those objectives. To assist in fostering diversity, the policy includes the requirement for the Company to take diversity of background into account (in addition to candidates’ skills and experience in a variety of the specified fields) when selecting new Directors, senior management and employees.

The Board is responsible for monitoring Company performance in complying with the Diversity Policy requirements and achieving these objectives in the future as director and senior executive positions become vacant and appropriately qualified candidates become available.

The Board assessed the gender diversity of the Company during FY16 and discloses the following proportions of men and women:

  • Whole organisation: 7 men and 14 women;

  • Senior Executive Positions: 2 men and 5 women;

  • • Board: 4 men and 3 women.

  • The Board consider ‘senior executives’ to be those roles which report to the CEO or the Board.

Given the current gender diversity represented in the organisation, the Board do not consider the Company’s operations to be of a nature or size to justify setting further measurable objectives in addition to the diversity strategies required under the Diversity Policy.

Please refer to the Diversity Policy for further details.

3

1.6 Companies should:
(a) have and disclose a process for periodically evaluating
the performance of the board, its committees and
individual directors; and
(b) disclose, in relation to each reporting period, whether a
performance evaluation was undertaken in the
reporting period in accordance with that process.
Yes The Board endeavors to objectively evaluate its own
performance and the performance of individual Directors on
an annual basis. The Board is responsible for periodically
evaluating the performance of the Board, the Chair and
each individual Director with such discretionary evaluation
techniques as appropriate during each evaluation period.
During the reporting period ending 30 June 2016, each
Director completed an anonymized performance survey for
each of the Board, the Chair and each other Director which
assessed performance with regard to the requirements of the
Corporate Governance Policies, ASX Corporate
Governance Principles and Recommendations and
customary best practices.
1.7 Companies should:
(a) have and disclose a process for periodically evaluating
the performance of its senior executives; and
(b) disclose, in relation to each reporting period, whether a
performance evaluation was undertaken in the
reporting period in accordance with that process.
Yes The Board is responsible for periodically evaluating the
performance of the Senior Executives and may employ such
discretionary evaluation techniques as appropriate during
each evaluation period.
During the reporting period ending 30 June 2016, the Board
evaluated the performance of each senior executive
against the Company’s operational and financial
performance, and the industry expectations of each senior
executive’s role. As a result of such evaluation, the Board
implemented an organization-wide restructure to improve
cost and operational efficiencies (as disclosed in June 2016).
As a result, several roles were made redundant or
reallocated to other relevant positions.
Please refer the Nomination Committee Charter for further
information.
2. Structure the board to add value
2.1 The Board should:
(a) have a nomination committee which:
(1) has at least three members,a majorityof whom
Yes Neither the Board, nor the Company’s operations, is
currently of a size or complexity to justify the formation of a
separate Nomination Committee. The Board has adopted

4

are independent directors; and
(2) is chaired by an independent director,
and disclose:
(3) the charter of the committee;
(4) the members of the committee; and
(5) as at the end of each reporting period, the
number of times the committee met throughout
the period and the individual attendances of the
members at those meetings; or
(b) if it does not have a nomination committee, disclose
that fact and the processes it employs to address board
succession issues and to ensure that the board has the
appropriate balance of skills, knowledge, experience,
independence and diversity to enable it to discharge its
duties and responsibilities effectively.
a Nomination Committee Charter which describes the role,
composition, functions and responsibilities of such a
Committee and a Remuneration Policy, which details the
remuneration principles the Board is to consider in setting
executive and senior management remuneration. Until
such time that a separate Nomination Committee is
constituted, the Board remains responsible for such matters
and will discharge its responsibilities in accordance with the
Nomination Committee Charter and Remuneration Policy
(to the extent applicable).
The Board oversees the appointment and induction
process for Directors and the selection, appointment and
succession planning process of the Company’s Managing
Director, where relevant. When a vacancy exists or there is
a need for a particular skill, the Board, determines the
selection criteria that will be applied, with consideration to
the Diversity Policy and requirements of the Nomination
Committee Charter. The Board will then identify suitable
candidates, with assistance from an external consultant if
required, and will interview and assess the selected
candidates.
Please refer to the Nomination Committee Charter.
2.2 Companies should have and disclose a board skills matrix
setting out the mix of skills and diversity that the board
currently has or is looking to achieve in its membership.
Yes Having regard to the Company’s business objectives and
strategies, the mix of skills, experience and diversity that the
Board seeks to maintain in its membership includes:
(a) fine jewellery industry experience;
(b) e-commerce experience;
(c) luxury marketing and brand development experience;
and
(d) financial literacy and legal and regulatory knowledge.
Please refer the Company’s Nomination Committee Charter

5

andDiversityPolicyfor furtherdetails.
2.3 Companies should disclose:
(a) the names of the directors considered by the board to
be independent directors;
(b) if a director has an interest, position, association or
relationship of the type described in Box 2.3 but the
board is of the opinion that it does not compromise the
independence of the director, the nature of the interest,
position, association or relationship in question and an
explanation of why the board is of that opinion; and
(c) the length of service of each director.
Yes The Board consists four Directors, including:

two independent, non-executive Directors Francis
Gouten and Andrew Worland;

one non-independent, non-executive Director, Charly
Duffy; and

one executive Director, Natalia Obolensky.
Whilst Charly Duffy is independent of the executive functions
of the Company, Ms Duffy does not currently qualify as an
independent Director under the guidance offered under the
ASX Corporate Governance Principles & Recommendations
due to her dual role as Company Secretary.
The length of services for each director is:

Francis Goutenmacher: appointed 3 December 2015

Andrew Worland: appointed 8 March 2012

Charly Duffy: appointed 3 December 2015

Natalia Obolensky: appointed 29 April 2016
2.4 A majority of the board should be independent directors. Yes The Board comprises a majority of independent Directors.
The current Board composition includes 2 independent, non-
executive Directors, one non-independent, non-executive
Director and one executive Director.
2.5 The chair of the board should be an independent director
and, in particular, should not be the same person as the
CEO.
Yes Mr Francis Gouten, the Company’s chairman is an
Independent Non-Executive Director.
2.6 Companies should have a program for inducting new
directors and provide appropriate professional
development opportunities for directors to develop and
maintain the skills and knowledge needed to perform their
role as directors effectively.
Yes The Board has induction and continuing professional
development programs and procedures for Directors to
ensure that they can effectively discharge their
responsibilities.
Please refer to the Nomination Committee Charter.
3 Act ethically and responsibly
3.1 Companies should: Yes The Board has adopted a Code of Conduct Policyto be

6

(a) have a code of conduct for its directors, senior
executives and employees; and
(b) disclose that code or a summary of it.
followed by all employees and officers (including Directors).
Please see the Corporate Code of Conduct available at
www.plukka.com/about-plukka/investor/.
4 Safeguard integrity in corporate reporting
4.1 The board should:
(a) have an audit committee which:
(1)
has at least three members, all of whom are non-
executive directors and a majority of whom are
independent directors; and
(2)
is chaired by an independent director, who is not
the chair of the board,
and disclose:
(3)
the charter of the committee;
(4)
the relevant qualifications and experience of the
members of the committee; and
(5)
in relation to each reporting period, the number of
times the committee met throughout the period
and the individual attendances of the members at
those meetings; or
(b) if it does not have an audit committee, disclose that
fact and the processes it employs that independently
verify and safeguard the integrity of its corporate
reporting, including the processes for the appointment
and removal of the external auditor and the rotation of
the audit engagementpartner.
Yes Neither the Board, nor the Company’s operations, is
currently of a size or complexity to justify the formation of a
separate Audit Committee. The Board has adopted an
Audit and Risk Committee Charter which describes the role,
composition, functions and responsibilities of such a
Committee and until such time that a separate Audit
Committee is constituted, the Board remains responsible for
such matters and will discharge its responsibilities in
accordance with the Audit and Risk Committee Charter (to
the extent applicable).
Please refer to the Audit and Risk Committee Charter for
details as to the processes it employs that independently
verify and safeguard the integrity of its corporate reporting,
including the processes for the appointment and removal
of the external auditor and the rotation of the audit
engagement partner.
4.2 The board should, before it approves the entity’s financial
statements for a financial period, receive from its CEO and
CFO a declaration that, in their opinion, the financial
records of the entity have been properly maintained and
that the financial statements comply with the appropriate
accounting standards and give a true and fair view of the
financial position and performance of the entity and that
the opinion has been formed on the basis of a sound system
Yes The Board ensures that, before it approves the entity’s
financial statements for a financial period, it receives
declarations from the Chief Executive Officer and/or Chief
Financial Officer, or such persons as required under the
Corporations Act to provide such a declaration, that, in their
opinion, the financial records of the entity have been
properly maintained and that the financial statements
complywith the appropriate accountingstandards andgive

7

of risk management and internal control which is operating
effectively.
a true and fair view of the financial position and
performance of the entity and that the opinion has been
formed on the basis of a sound system of risk management
and internal control which is operating effectively.
4.3 Companies should ensure that its external auditor attends its
AGM and is available to answer questions from security
holders relevant to the audit.
Yes The Board is responsible for ensuring that the external auditor
attends the Annual General Meeting of the Company and is
available to answer questions from shareholders of the
Company relevant to the audit.
Please refer to the Shareholder Communications Strategy set
out in the Corporate Governance Plan at
www.plukka.com/about-plukka/investor/.
5 Make timely and balanced disclosure
5.1 Companies should:
(a) have a written policy for complying with its continuous
disclosure obligations under the Listing Rules; and
(b) disclose that policy or a summary of it.
Yes The Company has adopted a Continuous Disclosure Policy to
ensure compliance with its continuous disclosure obligations
under the Listing Rules. The Policy establishes procedures that
seek to ensure that Directors and management are aware
of, and fulfil, their obligations in relation to the timely
disclosure of material price-sensitive information.
Please refer to the Continuous Disclosure Policy.
6 Respect the rights of security holders
6.1 Companies should provide information about itself and its
governance to investors via its website.
Yes Information regarding the Company, its business and its
governance is available on its website:
www.plukka.com/about-plukka/investor/.

8

6.2 Companies should design and implement an investor
relations program to facilitate effective two-way
communication with investors.
Yes The Board has adopted the Shareholder Communications
Strategy (available on the Company’s website:
www.plukka.com/about-plukka/investor/)which seeks to
ensure that all material information regarding the Company
is disclosed in accordance with the ASX Listing Rules and that
there is an effective two-way communication process
between the Company and investors.
Please refer to the Shareholder Communications Strategy for
further details.
6.3 Companies should disclose the policies and processes it has
in place to facilitate and encourage participation at
meetings of security holders.
Yes The Company’s Shareholder Communications Strategy
establishes procedures to encourage effective participation
at general meetings of the Company.
Please refer to the Shareholder Communications Policy
available at the website:http://www.plukka.com/about-
plukka/investor/
6.4 Companies should give security holders the option to
receive communications from, and send communications
to, the entity and its security registry electronically.
Yes The Company’s Shareholder Communications Strategy
ensures that Shareholders are able to access information
relevant to their shareholding in the Company via periodic
mail-outs and, in addition, allows shareholders to elect to
receive email communications.
Please refer to the Shareholder Communications Strategy for
further information.
7 Recognise and manage risk
7.1 Companies should:
(a) have a committee or committees to oversee risk, each
of which:
(1)
has at least three members, a majority of whom
are independent directors; and
(2)
is chaired byan independent director,
Yes Neither the Board, nor the Company’s operations, is
currently of a size or complexity to justify the formation of a
separate Risk Committee. The Board has adopted an Audit
and Risk Committee Charter which describes the role,
composition, functions and responsibilities that such a
Committee would typically be charge with and until such

9

and disclose:
(3)
the charter of the committee;
(4)
the members of the committee; and
(5)
as at the end of each reporting period, the
number of times the committee met throughout
the period and the individual attendances of the
members at those meetings; or
(b) if it does not have a risk committee or committees that
satisfy (a) above, disclose that fact and the processes it
employs for overseeing the entity’s risk management
framework.
time that a separate Risk Committee is constituted, the
Board remains responsible for such matters and will
discharge its responsibilities in accordance with the Audit
and Risk Committee Charter (to the extent applicable).
Please refer to the Audit and Risk Committee Charter and
Risk Management Policy for details as to the processes it
employs to oversee the entity’s risk management
framework.
7.2 The board or a committee of the board should:
(a) review the entity’s risk management framework at least
annually to satisfy itself that it continues to be sound;
and
(b) disclose, in relation to each reporting period, whether
such a review has taken place.
Yes The Board is responsible for reviewing the Company’s risk
management framework to ensure that such measures
continue to be sound and appropriate for the Company’s
risk appetite and growth objectives. Reviews of the risk
management framework may occur more or less frequently
than annually as necessitated by changes in the Company
and its operating environment.
The Board conducted a risk assessment of the Company’s
risks generally, and the risk management framework in place
to address such risks, in June 2016.
7.3 Companies should disclose:
(a) if it has an internal audit function, how the function is
structured and what role it performs; or
(b) if it does not have an internal audit function, that fact
and the processes it employs for evaluating and
continually improving the effectiveness of its risk
management and internal control processes
Yes The Company does not currently have an internal audit
function. The Board considers the processes employed
pursuant to the Audit and Risk Committee Charter and Risk
Management Policy are sufficient for evaluating, and
continually improving, the effectiveness of its risk
management and internal control processes given the size
and complexity of the Company’s business.
Please refer to the Company’s Audit and Risk Committee

10

Charter and the Risk Management Policy for further
information.
7.4 Companies should disclose whether it has any material
exposure to economic, environmental and social
sustainability risks and, if it does, how it manages or intends
to manage those risks.
Yes Like all of the Company’s competitors, the Company’s
performance is exposed to fluctuations in demand in the fine
jewellery industry, however, the Board considers the
Company’s strategy to focus on global, online distribution
mitigates these industry risks to the extent reasonably
possible. The Board do not consider there to be any other
material exposure to economic, environmental or social
sustainabilityrisks.
8 Remunerate fairly and responsibly
8.1 Companies should:
(a) have a remuneration committee which:
(1)
has at least three members, a majority of whom
are independent directors; and
(2)
is chaired by an independent director,
and disclose:
(3)
the charter of the committee;
(4)
the members of the committee; and
(5)
as at the end of each reporting period, the
number of times the committee met throughout
the period and the individual attendances of the
members at those meetings; or
(b) if it does not have a remuneration committee, disclose
that fact and the processes it employs for setting the
level and composition of remuneration for directors and
senior executives and ensuring that such remuneration is
appropriate and not excessive.
Yes Neither the Board, nor the Company’s operations, is
currently of a size or complexity to justify the formation of a
separate Remuneration Committee. The Board has
adopted a Nomination & Remuneration Committee
Charter which describes the role, composition, functions
and responsibilities that such a Committee would typically
be charged with and a Remuneration Policy which sets out
the principles to be applied when setting executive and
senior management remuneration. Until such time that a
separate Remuneration Committee is constituted, the
Board remains responsible for such matters and will
discharge its responsibilities in accordance with the
Nomination & Remuneration Committee Charter and
Remuneration Policy (to the extent applicable).
Please refer to the Nomination & Remuneration Committee
Charter and Remuneration Policy for details.
8.2 Companies should separately disclose its policies and
practices regarding the remuneration of non-executive
directors and the remuneration of executive directors and
other senior executives.
Yes The Company’s Remuneration Policy separately discloses its
policies and practices regarding the remuneration of Non-
Executive Directors and the remuneration of executive
directors and other senior executives.

11

Please see the Remuneration Policy.
8.3 A company which has an equity-based remuneration
scheme should:
(a) have a policy on whether participants are permitted to
enter into transactions (whether through the use of
derivatives or otherwise) which limit the economic risk of
participating in the scheme; and
(b) disclosethatpolicy ora summary of it.
N/A As at the date of this Statement, the Company does not
have an equity based remuneration scheme in place.

12