Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

TALGA GROUP LTD Capital/Financing Update 2026

Jan 14, 2026

65925_rns_2026-01-14_7c59d3fa-3a57-4072-86da-d55c9a02fd1b.pdf

Capital/Financing Update

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

ASX Release 15 January 2026

ASX:TLG

Talga identifies high-grade Gallium and Critical Elements at Aero Project in Sweden

Battery materials company Talga Group Ltd (“ Talga ” or “ the Company ”) is pleased to provide an exploration update from its 100% owned Aero Project (“Aero” or “Project”) in Sweden, where recent rock chip sampling programs, field mapping and evaluation have confirmed evidence of high-grade gallium and other critical elements.

Highlights

  • High-grade gallium at Aero Project from reconnaissance surface rock samples over 8km strike, plus associated anomalous concentrations of caesium, niobium, tantalum, yttrium and scandium. Highlight assay results include:

  • Sample BD00033: 296ppm Ga2O3

  • Sample A26450: 820ppm Cs2O

  • o Sample A26217: 1,010ppm Nb2O5, 595ppm Ta2O5 and 186ppm Y2O3 o Sample A26365: 313ppm Sc2O3

  • Re-evaluation of the project with an Exploration Information System tool, part of an EUfunded, global collaboration, indicates further zones yet to be field checked and sampled.

  • The critical metal results build on previous lithium and pegmatite discoveries at Aero, with grades of up to 1.9% Li2O within the 270km² project area.

  • Further sampling and field mapping is planned for the summer season and results will determine and prioritise targets for drilling.

Talga Group CEO, Martin Phillips, commented : “These results at Aero demonstrate the prospectivity of Talga’s strategic mineral portfolio in Sweden at a time of global technology metal demand growth. We aim to engage strategic partners, including government-related bodies in the US and EU, to advance the project while maintaining focus on the Company’s core battery graphite anode business.”

==> picture [127 x 149] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [147 x 149] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1 : Pegmatite outcrops at Talga’s Aero Project, Sweden.

Talga Group Ltd ABN 32 138 405 419 ASX: TLG

Suite 3.03, Level 3, [email protected] www.talgagroup.com 46 Colin Street +61 8 9481 6667 Talga Group West Perth 6005 @Talga_Ltd Australia

Exploration at Aero Project

The Aero Project covers an area of 270km² located 20km southeast of Gällivare, a major mining hub in Sweden's Norrbotten region which benefits from established infrastructure including roads, rail, power, and proximity to mining services (Figure 2). Previous exploration activity at Aero has identified lithium oxide over a 50km total strike with surface sample grades of up to 1.9% Li2O (ASX:TLG 29/8/2023).

Talga has recently completed field mapping and geochemical rock outcrop sampling and re-evaluated the project via the application of the Exploration Information System (EIS) digital tool. This tool is the result of an EU-funded, international and collaborative project between geological surveys, universities and industry companies across the world, in which Talga took part as a test user. The EIS project led to the creation of a machine-learning predictive tool which was used by Talga to model the mineral prospectivity map (MPM) for mineralised pegmatites over Aero (Figure 4). The Company plans on refining and updating this model as exploration activities progress and new data is made available.

The surface rock exposures have returned high-grade and anomalous concentrations of gallium, rare earth elements (REEs) including yttrium, and other critical minerals and elements, statistically exceeding bulk crustal abundances (defined by Rudnick and Gao 2014[1] ). Compared to global deposits, these results are considered significant for such first pass exploration. Host rocks are predominantly pegmatites with some grano-diorites. All analyte data was provided in elemental form and converted to oxide equivalents using standard industry factors (James Cook University – Advanced Analytical Centre[2] ) see Tables 1-2 and Figure 3 below.

==> picture [444 x 297] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2 : Aero Project – location map showing mapped pegmatites to date.

1 “Composition of the Continental Crust” Rudnick, R.L & Gow, S., in Treatise on Geochemistry 2nd Ed, edited by Holland H.D and Turekian KK Elsevier, Oxford (2014)

[2 ] JCU Advanced Analytical Centre, https://www.jcu.edu.au/advanced-analytical-centre (2026)

==> picture [73 x 121] intentionally omitted <==

www.talgagroup.com

2 / 12

This suite of critical minerals and elements is increasingly gaining importance in global supply chains as governments such as the US, UK, Japan, Europe, South Korea, Australia and Canada collaborate to build strategic reserves. Gallium and caesium are used in semiconductors which drive advanced telecommunications amongst other applications. Niobium, scandium, tantalum and yttrium are often used in alloys for lightweight applications vital in the aerospace, defence and automotive industries. Yttrium is also used in lasers.

Table 1: Conversion of select anomalous oxide values from Aero rock chip samples.

Table 1:Conversi on of select anomalous oxide values on of select anomalous oxide values from Aero rock chip s amples.
Sample SWEREF99 TM Element Element Oxide Oxide
Easting Northing **ppm ** **ppm **
BD00033 784204 7450116 Gallium 220 296 Ga2O3
A26450 784326 7451830 Caesium 773 820 Cs2O
A26217 784302 7451967 Niobium 706 1010 Nb2O5
Tantalum 487 595 Ta2O5
Yttrium (REE) 147 186 Y2O3
A26365 777578 7457526 Scandium (REE) 204 313 Sc2O3

Figure 3 Selected rock sample locations (Ga>50ppm), displaying Ga2O3 values

==> picture [269 x 405] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [73 x 121] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 4 Aero Project pegmatite prospectivity model map

==> picture [194 x 405] intentionally omitted <==

www.talgagroup.com

3 / 12

Table 2: Assay results of all Aero Project rock chip samples with >50ppm Ga.

Table 2:Assay results of all Aero Project rock results of all Aero Project rock chip sam ples with >5 0ppm Ga.
SAMPLE SWEREF99 TM ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm
Easting Northing **Cs2O ** Ga2O3 Nb2O5 Sc2O3 Ta2O5 Y2O3
A24439 784296 7451923 531.2 75.3 77.1 151.4 53.5 3.2
A26467 784338 7453003 45.6 71.5 106.4 NA 72.2 46.0
A26472 784304 7451958 261.9 68.6 166.7 NA 96.2 32.3
A26480 777577 7457531 82.9 107.3 150.9 NA 54.3 33.5
A26486 779809 7457453 14.3 80.4 102.9 NA 25.5 21.7
A26217 784302 7451967 179.7 69.1 1009.9 NA 594.7 186.0
A26430 779587 7457489 19.3 75.3 132.3 NA 29.1 21.7
BD00033 784204 7450116 43.8 295.7 559.3 267.6 70.8 0.1
BD00039 784299 7451921 246.0 90.9 301.8 36.5 359 23.9
BD00044 783844 7441525 11.7 77.2 313.3 51.8 188.7 54.0
BD00061 779731 7457424 6.6 76.6 160.2 64.0 34.3 33.1
BD00063 779459 7457482 30.5 67.2 103.4 159.5 29.3 39.9
BD00066 777431 7456913 11.5 130.0 383.4 104.9 81.0 24.6
BD00067 777555 7457536 19.1 70.3 0.0 179.5 467.7 26.5
A26356 779768 7457454 15.0 73.8 82.4 30.8 14.7 12.1
A26357 779717 7457440 16.7 79.3 76.1 69.9 14.1 30.6
A26359 779634 7457620 7.1 88.9 135.9 308.3 13.1 4.8
A26365 777578 7457526 88.6 132.4 289.0 312.9 43.8 34.9

Notes:

The assay results have been converted into oxides using the following stochiometric conversion factors: Cs2O 1.0602, Ga2O3 1.3442, Nb2O5 1.4305, Sc2O3 1.5338, Ta2O5 1.2211, Y2O3 1.2699

Refer to JORC Table Sections 1 and 2 for assaying and sampling details

==> picture [73 x 121] intentionally omitted <==

www.talgagroup.com

4 / 12

Next Steps

Talga considers the potential of Aero to be greater than previously recognised in light of recent results and looks forward to evaluating the gallium and critical mineral potential of Aero further, initially with additional geochemical, metallurgical and petrographic studies.

The Company is also pursuing US and EU funding opportunities, including applications under DOE critical minerals programs and EU CRMA strategic project calls, to accelerate development. In parallel, Talga is engaging with major strategic partners for joint ventures or divestment, targeting global players in mining, technology, and defence sectors, as well as other government-related bodies. This approach aims to allow Talga to unlock Aero's value while prioritising the Company’s core graphite battery anode business.

Authorised for release by the Board of Directors of Talga Group Ltd.

For further information please contact:

Mark Thompson Candice Sgroi Managing Director Group Investor Relations Manager Talga Group Ltd Talga Group Ltd +61 (0) 8 9481 6667 +61 (0) 400 492 285

About Talga

Talga Group Ltd (ASX:TLG / OTCQX:TLGRF) is a global leader in producing high-power, sustainable battery anode and advanced graphitic materials. Our capabilities include proprietary graphite purification, shaping and coating technologies, ensuring secure and low-emission Li-ion battery anode supply chains and new-energy materials. Talga’s products and technologies solve battery manufacturing challenges such as supply vulnerabilities, performance limitations and recyclability, thereby accelerating the shift to more secure critical mineral product manufacturing. Website: www.talgagroup.com

Forward-Looking Statements & Disclaimer

Statements in this document regarding the Company's business or proposed business, which are not historical facts, are forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, such as estimates and statements that describe the Company's future plans, objectives or goals, including words to the effect that the Company or management expects a stated condition or result to occur. Those risks and uncertainties include factors and risks specific to the industries in which the Company operates and proposes to operate as well as general economic conditions, prevailing exchange rates and interest rates and conditions in the financial markets, among other things. Since forward-looking statements address future events and conditions, by their very nature, they involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Actual results in each case could differ materially from those currently anticipated in such statements. Investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.

No forward-looking statement is a guarantee or representation as to future performance or any other future matters, which will be influenced by a number of factors and subject to various uncertainties and contingencies, many of which will be outside the Company’s control. There can be no assurance that the plans of the directors and management of Talga will proceed as currently expected or will ultimately be successful.

==> picture [73 x 121] intentionally omitted <==

www.talgagroup.com

5 / 12

The Company does not undertake any obligation to update publicly or release any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after today's date or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. No representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to the fairness, accuracy, completeness or correctness of the information, opinions or conclusions contained in this announcement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, none of the Company’s directors, employees, advisors, or agents, nor any other person, accepts any liability for any loss arising from the use of the information contained in this announcement.

This announcement may not be distributed in any jurisdiction except in accordance with the legal requirements applicable in such jurisdiction. Recipients should inform themselves of the restrictions that apply in their own jurisdiction. A failure to do so may result in a violation of securities laws in such jurisdiction. This document does not constitute investment advice and has been prepared without taking into account the recipient’s investment objectives, financial circumstances or particular needs and the opinions and recommendations in this representation are not intended to represent recommendations of particular investments to particular persons.

Competent Persons Statement

The information in this document that relates to the exploration results and the exploration target is based on information compiled by Albert Thamm. Mr Thamm is a consultant to the Company and a Competent Person who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (Membership No.203217). Mr Thamm has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and types of deposits under consideration and to the activity which has been undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (JORC Code). Mr Thamm consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears. The Information in this announcement that relates to prior exploration results for the Aero Project extracted from ASX announcements available to view on the Company’s website at www.talgagroup.com. The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the exploration results included in the relevant original market announcements. The Company confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person and Qualified Person’s findings are presented have not been materially modified from the relevant original market announcements.

==> picture [73 x 121] intentionally omitted <==

www.talgagroup.com

6 / 12

JORC Code 2012 Edition

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

Criteria JORC Code Explanation Commentary
Sampling
techniques

Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut
channels, random chips, or specific
specialised industry standard
measurement tools appropriate to the
minerals under investigation, such as
downhole gamma sondes, or handheld
XRF instruments, etc). These examples
should not be taken as limiting the broad
meaning of sampling.

Include reference to measures taken to
ensure sample representivity and the
appropriate calibration of any
measurement tools or systems used.
Aspects of the determination of
mineralisation that are Material to the
Public Report.

In cases where ‘industry standard’ work
has been done this would be relatively
simple (e.g. ‘reverse circulation drilling
was used to obtain 1 m samples from
which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a
30g charge for fire assay’). In other
cases, more explanation may be
required, such as where there is coarse
gold that has inherent sampling
problems. Unusual commodities or
mineralisation types (e.g. submarine
nodules) may warrant disclosure of
detailed information.
Samples in this report are surface rock chips
collected from various pegmatite outcrops and
historic gem diggings/dumps. Given the nature
of pegmatites having variable grain size and
mineralogy, samples are taken to be
representative but sample bias may have been
introduced in coarse mineralisation. The rock
samples collected were between 0.5kg and 3kg
in weight.
Drilling
techniques

Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation,
open-hole hammer, rotary air blast,
auger, Bangka, sonic, etc.) and details
(e.g. core diameter, triple or standard
tube, depth of diamond tails, face-
sampling bit or other type, whether core
is oriented and if so, by what method,
etc.).
N/A as no drilling completed to date.
Drill
sample
recovery

Method of recording and assessing core
and chip sample recoveries and results
assessed.

Measures taken to maximise sample
recovery and ensure representative
nature of the samples.

Whether a relationship exists between
sample recovery and grade and whether
sample bias may have occurred due to
preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse
material.
N/A as no drilling completed to date.
Logging
Whether core and chip samples have
been geologically and geotechnically
A short geological description of each sample

==> picture [73 x 121] intentionally omitted <==

www.talgagroup.com

7 / 12

logged to a level of detail to support
appropriate Mineral Resource
estimation, mining studies and
metallurgical studies.

Whether logging is qualitative or
quantitative in nature. Core (or costean,
channel, etc.) photography.

The total length and percentage of the
relevant intersections logged.
was taken at the time of collection.
The descriptions are qualitative: lithology,
alteration, mineralisation etc.
All samples are photographed.
Sub-
sampling
techniques
and sample
preparation

If core, whether cut or sawn and whether
quarter, half or all core taken.

If non-core, whether riffled, tube
sampled, rotary split, etc. and whether
sampled wet or dry.

For all sample types, the nature, quality
and appropriateness of the sample
preparation technique.

Quality control procedures adopted for
all sub-sampling stages to maximise
representivity of samples.

Measures taken to ensure that the
sampling is representative of the in-situ
material collected, including for instance
results for field duplicate/second-half
sampling.

Whether sample sizes are appropriate to
the grain size of the material being
sampled.
No field sub-sampling techniques were
employed.
Samples were hammered off outcrop and
mullock dump material using a rock hammer.
Sample size varied but averaged 1-2kg. The
samples are considered point samples (up to
1m2) and may be biased towards mineralised
samples. The size of the samples is considered
appropriate for this type of work. No field
duplicates were taken.
The sample preparation for all samples followed
industry best practice and was undertaken by
ALS Global in Malå or Piteå. The samples were
dried and pulverised to produce a sub-sample
for analysis. Sample preparation involved oven
drying, coarse crushing, followed by total
pulverisation LM2 grinding mills to a grind size
of 85% passing 75 microns.
Quality of
assay data
and
laboratory
tests

The nature, quality and appropriateness
of the assaying and laboratory
procedures used and whether the
technique is considered partial or total.

For geophysical tools, spectrometers,
handheld XRF instruments, etc., the
parameters used in determining the
analysis including instrument make and
model, reading times, calibrations factors
applied and their derivation, etc.

Nature of quality control procedures
adopted (e.g. standards, blanks,
duplicates, external laboratory checks)
and whether acceptable levels of
accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and precision
have been established.
All rock samples were assayed via ICPMS
methods with 25 rock samples assayed using a
four-acid digest, multi-element suite (48
elements) with ICPMS finish. The acids used
were hydrofluoric, nitric, hydrochloric and
perchloric with the method approaching near
total digest for most elements. Two rock
samples (A26450-51) were assayed using a
sodium peroxide fusion with hydrochloric acid
and ICP-MS instrumentation. The analytical
methods are considered appropriate for this
style of mineralisation.
No geophysical tools or handheld instruments
were utilised in the preparation of this release.
Lab repeat or duplicate analysis for samples
showed that the precision of samples were
within acceptable limits.
Verification
of
sampling
and
assaying

The verification of significant
intersections by either independent or
alternative company personnel.

The use of twinned holes.

Documentation of primary data, data
entry procedures, data verification, data
storage (physical and electronic)
protocols.
No independent third-party assaying or
sampling has been undertaken at this stage.
Results have been reviewed internally by the
Company’s Exploration Manager, Geologist and
external consultant Mr Albert Thamm and no
issues have been identified.
Sampling data was captured digitally and is
stored on the Company’s data server.

==> picture [73 x 121] intentionally omitted <==

www.talgagroup.com

8 / 12


Discuss any adjustment to assay data.
Laboratory data is also stored on the
Company’s data server.
No adjustments or calibrations were made to
any assay data used in this report. Any results
reported as oxides were converted using
standard stochiometric conversion factors.
Location of
data points

Accuracy and quality of surveys used to
locate drill holes (collar and down-hole
surveys), trenches, mine workings and
other locations used in Mineral Resource
estimation.

Specification of the grid system used.

Quality and adequacy of topographic
control.
A Garmin handheld GPS unit with an accuracy
of +/- 5m was used to locate each sample.
Sample locations use the Swedish Coordinate
System ‘SWEREF99 TM’ grid.
Data
spacing
and
distribution

Data spacing for reporting of Exploration
Results.

Whether the data spacing and
distribution is sufficient to establish the
degree of geological and grade
continuity appropriate for the Mineral
Resource and Ore Reserve estimation
procedure(s) and classifications applied.

Whether sample compositing has been
applied.
Samples were taken at non-regular intervals
according to observations made at the time in
the field. No grade continuity is implied. No
sample compositing has been applied.
Orientation
of data in
relation to
geological
structure

Whether the orientation of sampling
achieves unbiased sampling of possible
structures and the extent to which this is
known, considering the deposit type.

If the relationship between the drilling
orientation and the orientation of key
mineralised structures is considered to
have introduced a sampling bias, this
should be assessed and reported if
material.
Samples were taken according to observations
made at the time in the field.
No known sample bias as a consequence of
_orientation-based_sampling has been identified.
Samples with coarse mineralisation may be
preferentially sampled so some sample bias
may be introduced.
Sample
security

The measures taken to ensure sample
security.
Samples were collected and transported to the
laboratory by Tom Kearney, Talga’s Exploration
Manager.
Audits or
reviews

The results of any audits or reviews of
sampling techniques and data.
No external audits or reviews of the sampling
techniques and data have been completed to
date. Results have been reviewed internally by
the Company’s Exploration Manager, Geologist
and external consultant Mr Albert Thamm and
no issues have been identified.

==> picture [73 x 121] intentionally omitted <==

www.talgagroup.com

9 / 12

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Mineral
tenement and
land tenure
status

Type, reference name/number, location
and ownership including agreements or
material issues with third parties such
as joint ventures, partnerships,
overriding royalties, native title
interests, historical sites, wilderness or
national park and environmental
settings.

The security of the tenure held at the
time of reporting along with any known
impediments to obtaining a licence to
operate in the area.
The Aero Project (formerly Aitik East Project)
comprises exploration licences Suorravaara nr
3, nr 5, nr 6, nr 7 and Nilivaara nr 1 owned
100% by the Company’s 100% owned
Swedish subsidiary, Talga Tech AB. The
licences are located 30km east from the
regional town of Gällivare. The licences are
located in an open area of forested land
utilised seasonally by the logging industry and
Sami reindeer herders of the Gällivare
municipality. The licences are in good standing
with no known impediments.
Exploration
done by other
parties

Acknowledgment and appraisal of
exploration by other parties.
The SGU noted lithium mineralisation in 1940’s
but reported no grades. Historic rock chip
sampling for copper was completed by Boliden
and SGU, and Talga has conducted EM
surveys and rock sampling since 2017.
Several areas of minor excavations by
prospectors for gem tourmalines are found in
the pegmatites and have been visited by
gemmologists/collectors. There is no known
prior technical exploration for lithium prior to
Talga.
Geology
Deposit type, geological setting and
style of mineralisation.
The Aero Project lies within the
Paleoproterozoic volcanic rocks of the
Fennoscandian Shield. At Aero lithium
mineralisation is hosted within tourmaline-
bearing (elbaite) pegmatites intruded as sills,
sheets and dikes into the volcanic and
granitoid basement rocks. The deposit style
appears analogous to the Li-Cs-Ta pegmatite
model but geological evaluation by Talga is
ongoing.
Drill hole
Information

A summary of all information material
to the understanding of the exploration
results including a tabulation of the
following information for all Material
drill holes:
o easting and northing of the drill hole
collar
o elevation or RL (Reduced Level –
elevation above sea level in
metres) of the drill hole collar
o dip and azimuth of the hole
o down hole length and interception
depth
o hole length.

If the exclusion of this information is
justified on the basis that the
information is not Material and this
exclusion does not detract from the
understanding of the report, the
N/A. No drill hole data is in this report. Surface
rock sampling information is included within
the body of this report.

==> picture [73 x 121] intentionally omitted <==

www.talgagroup.com

10 / 12

Competent Person should clearly
explain why this is the case.
Data
aggregation
methods

In reporting Exploration Results,
weighting averaging techniques,
maximum and/or minimum grade
truncations (e.g. cutting of high grades)
and cut-off grades are usually Material
and should be stated.

Where aggregate intercepts
incorporate short lengths of high grade
results and longer lengths of low grade
results, the procedure used for such
aggregation should be stated and
some typical examples of such
aggregations should be shown in
detail.

The assumptions used for any
reporting of metal equivalent values
should be clearly stated.
No aggregations applied.
No metal equivalents applied.
Relationship
between
mineralisation
widths and
intercept
lengths

These relationships are particularly
important in the reporting of
Exploration Results.

If the geometry of the mineralisation
with respect to the drill hole angle is
known, its nature should be reported.

If it is not known and only the down
hole lengths are reported, there should
be a clear statement to this effect (e.g.
‘down hole length, true width not
known’).
N/A as no drilling completed to date.
Diagrams
Appropriate maps and sections (with
scales) and tabulations of intercepts
should be included for any significant
discovery being reported These should
include, but not be limited to a plan
view of drill hole collar locations and
appropriate sectional views.
Refer to figures in the body of text.
Balanced
reporting

Where comprehensive reporting of all
Exploration Results is not practicable,
representative reporting of both low
and high grades and/or widths should
be practiced to avoid misleading
reporting of Exploration Results.
The Company believes that the ASX
announcement is a balanced report with all
material results and information available to
date.
Other
substantive
exploration
data

Other exploration data, if meaningful
and material, should be reported
including (but not limited to): geological
observations; geophysical survey
results; geochemical survey results;
bulk samples – size and method of
treatment; metallurgical test results;
bulk density, groundwater,
geotechnical and rock characteristics;
potential deleterious or contaminating
substances.
Everything meaningful and material at this
stage is disclosed and no other significant
geological data has been reviewed to date.
Further work
The nature and scale of planned
further work (e.g. tests for lateral
extensions or depth extensions or
large-scale step-out drilling).

Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas
of possible extensions, including the
maingeological interpretations and
Talga has conducted a summer exploration
program for the Aero Project including
geochemical sampling, data review and field
mapping of pegmatites. Further sampling and
field mapping is planned and results will be
synthesised to determine and prioritise targets

==> picture [73 x 121] intentionally omitted <==

www.talgagroup.com

11 / 12

future drilling areas, provided this for drilling with the goal to delineate significant information is not commercially concentrations of lithium minerals. sensitive.

==> picture [73 x 121] intentionally omitted <==

www.talgagroup.com

12 / 12