AI assistant
SUREFIRE RESOURCES NL — Interim / Quarterly Report 2015
Oct 29, 2015
65857_rns_2015-10-29_af9a485c-8edb-4c77-bf73-548b12fa6217.pdf
Interim / Quarterly Report
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
==> picture [594 x 122] intentionally omitted <==
| Black Ridge Mining NL ASX Code:BRD ACN: 083 274 024 Registered Office c/ Ground Floor 63 Hay Street Subiaco WA 6008 t: +61 (8) 9 322 7822 www.blackridgemining.com.au Capital Structure 1,456,203,481 ordinary shares 601,641,823 options ($0.003, exp 30/11/16) Board Members Peter Elliott Non-Executive Chairman Thomas Gilfillan Non-Executive Director Vladimir Nikolaenko Non-Executive Director Graeme Smith Company Secretary |
Quarterly Report – September 2015 HIGHLIGHTS Further infill and extensional Mobile Metal Ion (“MMI”) sampling completed at Unaly Hill Project Peak of gold anomaly increased to a response ration (“RR”) of 189 from previous peak of 104 RR CORPORATE HIGHLIGHTS Entitlements Issue – 601.6 million shares and 601.6 million options issued following closure of Entitlements Issue $203,000 cash raised and $1,000,000 of debt swapped for equity PetroLocate Technology PL14 unit acquired MINERAL EXPLORATION ACTIVITIES Unaly Hill Project, Yilgarn Block WA (100% BRD) During the September Quarter Black Ridge Mining NL carried out a third round of geochemical MMI soil sampling at the companies Unaly Hill Project. This program followed two previous surveys, carried out during December 2014 and June 2015, which highlighted several multi-element anomalies, notably gold, nickel and vanadium-iron-titanium. |
|
|---|---|---|
Sampling during the quarter included 186 new samples bringing the total number of MMI samples from three rounds of sampling to 794. The recently completed survey reduced sample line spacing to 125m while maintaining sample spacing along lines at 75m. This program was designed to infill the existing strong gold and base metal anomalism and to test further continuity along strike.
The third round of MMI sampling has provided further confirmation and resolution of the known gold anomaly. Three new lines to the north showed further continuation of the anomaly extending it to the north-north-east by
400m where it remains open. The previous peak gold sample of 104RR was bettered by 82% to 189RR with another sample recording 185RR i.e. 189 and 185times the statistical background as defined by the 25[th] quartile of gold results.
==> picture [174 x 250] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 1 MMI sampling locations at Unaly Hill Project, Rounds 1, 2, and 3
With each successive sampling program completed the company has continued to improve upon the previous rounds results and further delineate this significant gold anomaly (BRD ASX Announcements 6/3/2015 and 13/7/2015). The MMI sampling has focused on an area in the north east corner of the originally sampling program immediately east and north-east of Unaly Hill.
The gold anomaly is hosted within several lithologies including tholeiitic basalt, amygdaloidal basalt, pyroxenites, and gneiss, the structurally complex area adjacent to the regional scale Youanmi Fault. The gold is related to northnorth-east trending brittle/ductile shears and north east sinistral cross faults and related quartz veining.
The Unaly Hill Project (E57/420) is situated some 500km north east of Perth, Western Australia and is a single tenement covering over 13 kilometres of the strike length of the regionally significant Youanmi Fault. This structure represents the boundary between the Murchison Province and the Southern Cross Province of the Youanmi Terrane of the Yilgarn Craton. Immediately west of the Fault is the Atley Igneous Complex.
==> picture [480 x 289] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 2 Regional Geology showing the Atley Igneous Complex
The initial program was implemented utilising the MMI technique for its ability to see anomalies concealed beneath transported soils. Historic conventional soil sampling surveys carried out at the project had largely been shown to be ineffective in defining significant metal soil anomalism. The MMI soil sampling and analytical method has been commercially developed to detect buried mineralisation beneath regolith and/or transported cover. Results are given in parts per billion (ppb) range with the lower (25[th] ) quartile used as the statistical background and element anomalies calculated as a response ratio (RR) relative to the background. Samples were sent to SGS laboratories in Perth for analysis of a suite of 19 elements which included Ag, Al, As, Au, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mg, Mn, Ni, Pb, Pd, Pt, S, Ti, V, and Zn.
RESULTS
Response ratios were calculated for each of the 19 elements. A response ratio measures the degree of enrichment in each element per sample, and is calculated by comparing each result per element per sample with the calculated background in that element. A background was set using the statistic 25[th] quartile of all results from both the December 2014, June 2015, and September 2015 surveys to produce a larger population of results from which to determine anomalies.
==> picture [268 x 371] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 3 MMI gold anomalies
The overall north-north-easterly trend of the gold anomaly is delineated by an Au +50 RR core which is semicontinuous. Sinistral north-westerly faults and veins cross cut the overall trend and also appear to be mineralised as shown by the morphology of the anomaly. Where structural intersections occur it appears that the mineralisation is concentrated and higher RR’s are present. The recent round of infill sampling has provided better resolution by which to identify anomalies and understand their structural trends which will be critical in targeting any follow up drill testing of high priority targets.
A central higher grade “core” of the anomaly, greater than 40 RR, is over 1km in strike length, bearing generally north-south. This well attenuated anomaly is situated just east of the Youanmi Fault structure and the strike direction of the anomaly may represent a mineralised secondary structural splay. At +25RR gold is continuous for over 2km with numerous higher grade pockets of mineralisation. The gold anomaly also remains open to the north where it is expected to continue.
==> picture [471 x 315] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 4 MMI gold anomalies in the north east corner of the survey area on magnetic image
Competent Persons Statement
Information in this report relating to exploration results is based on information compiled by consultant geologist, Mr Martin Dormer, who is a member of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Dormer has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person under the 2004 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Dormer operates as Martin Matthew Bruce Dormer and Pennelope Anne Dormer as trustees for the Dormer Family Trust trading as “Unearthed Elements”. Mr Dormer consents to the inclusion of such information in this report and the context in which it appears.
CORPORATE
Non Renounceable Entitlements Issue
On 5 June 2015 Black Ridge announced that the Company would be conducting a pro-rata non-renounceable entitlement issue to shareholders of approximately 854,561,658 fully paid ordinary shares at an issue price of $0.002 per Share on the basis of one New Share for every one Share held at the record date together with one Free Attaching Option for each Share issued, to raise approximately $1,709,123 before expenses.
The Entitlement Issue was completed on 20 August 2015 and raised $203,000. The Issue was underwritten to $1,000,000 which was offset against debts owed by the Company to the Underwriter.
The following securities were issued following completion:
-
101,641,823 fully paid ordinary shares (BRD) from the Entitlements Issue; and
-
500,000,000 fully paid ordinary shares (BRD) issued to Plato Mining Pty Ltd, or their nominees, pursuant to their role as Underwriter.
-
601,641,823 unlisted options (BRDAI) exercisable at $0.003 each & expiring 30 November 2016.
Petrolocate Technology
Following the acquisition of the PL14 Seismoelectric exploration technology system, Black Ridge can confirm that Mr Ervin Kraemer, the designer of the Seismoelectric PL14 technology, will be in Perth from 15 to 22 November inclusive to conduct theoretical and field training with BRD technical personnel.
Going forward money-saving exploration techniques will be critical for oil and gas companies requiring to explore for energy resources within their permits. This technology has the ability to significantly de-risk oil and gas targets and does so at substantial cost savings to traditional seismic survey exploration methods.
Unlike the traditional seismic surveys this technology and equipment does not require large areas of cleared land. The portable operating unit is robust and extremely mobile and is able to be operated in rugged and difficult terrain and environmentally sensitive areas.
During the visit field trials will be undertaken on Empire Oil & Gas 100% owned acreage in the Perth basin. In addition, keen interest has been expressed by numerous oil and gas companies to have tests done on their permits in the Perth basin.
The benefits to Black Ridge from these tests lie in the ability of the Company to charge a service fee for Seismoelectric work done and a success fee/profit share/royalty, based on successful results.
Black Ridge will also be hosting a seminar on the Technology, with Ervin Kraemer as main platform speaker.
Strategic Alliance
During the quarter, the Company through its wholly owned subsidiary Oil & Gas SE Pty Ltd, signed a Letter of Intent to establish a strategic alliance with Asto Geophysical Consulting Pty Ltd for the utilization of the Companies oil and gas exploration equipment, using the Seismoelectric PL14 technology.
This cutting edge new generation technology, PetroLocate PL14, is designed specifically for detecting resistive liquids (oil, gas and water) to a depth of up to 3,000 meters.
Asto Geophysical Consulting Pty Ltd is a geophysical consulting company which provides state of the art geophysical services to the Oil and Gas industry. It is actively engaged internationally, with an accent on South East Asia. These services include survey design, acquisition, processing, interpretation and integration of acoustic and borehole seismic data.
SCHEDULE OF TENEMENTS
| Project | Tenement Details | Interest |
|---|---|---|
| Western Australia Unaly Hill |
E57/420 | 100% |
Appendix 1 - JORC Code 2012 Edition Table 1
Section 1: Sampling Techniques and data
| Criteria | JORC Code Explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Sampling Techniques |
Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gammas nodes, or hand held XRF instruments, etc.). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of _sampling. _ |
The Unaly Hill Project is sampled on a nominal 125m by 75m grid spacing. A total of 186 samples were collected at a depth of between 10cm and 25cm in accordance with sampling protocols stipulated by SGS Laboratories. |
| Include reference to the measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. |
The sample locations are picked up by handheld GPS. Samples were logged for landform, and sample contamination. Sampling was carried out under consultant Unearthed Elements standard protocols andQAQCprocedures asper industrybestpractise. |
|
| Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. In cases where 'Industry standard' work has been done this would be relatively simple (e.g. 'reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1m samples from which 3kg was pulverised to produce a 30g charge for fire assay') In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is course gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities mineralisation types (e.g. submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. |
All samples were sieved through -5mm plastic sieve in accordance with SGS MMI sampling protocols. QAQC protocols include that laboratory analysis of at least 10-20% of all samples. Samples were sent to SGS Laboratories in Perth, where they were prepared for analysis by SGS's propriety MMI analytical technique. |
|
| Drilling techniques |
Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open- hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc.) and details (e.g. core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc.) |
Drilling was not conducted |
| Drill sample recovery |
Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed. |
Drilling was not conducted |
| Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. |
Drilling was not conducted | |
| Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. |
Drilling was not conducted | |
| Logging | Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnical logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies |
Soil samples were not logged |
| Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel etc.) photography |
Soil samples were not logged | |
| The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. |
Soil samples were not logged |
| Criteria | JORC Code Explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Sub- sampling techniques and sample preparation |
If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. |
Drilling was not conducted. |
| If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc. and whether sampled wet or dry. |
Drilling was not conducted. | |
| For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. |
All soil samples were prepared for analysis in the field being sieved to -5mm, bagged, numbered and sorted. AtSGS Laboratories in Perth samples were sorted and dried, thence pulverised with 10-20% of the sample (approx. 25g) being analysed. |
|
| Quality control procedures adopted for all sub- sampling stages to maximise representatively of samples. |
No quality control procedures undertaken to determine sample representivity. |
|
| Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling |
5 duplicate samples were collected. All samples were considered to be within acceptable parametres for repeatability. |
|
| Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled. |
No orientation soil surveys were completed prior to theprogram. |
|
| Quality of assay data and laboratory tests |
The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. |
Samples were taken in the field and analysed in the laboratory in accordance with best practise industry standard for the medium sampled in the particular environment and is considered appropriate geochemical test work. |
| For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc. the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibration factors applied and their derivation, etc. |
No XRF, spectrometers or similar instruments were used. |
|
| Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g. standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and precision have been established. |
No standards or blanks were used in this program | |
| Verification of sampling and assaying |
The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. |
There has been no external check assaying undertaken on the soil samples. |
| The use of twinned holes. | Drilling was not conducted. | |
| Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verifications, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. |
Location and sampling data were collected by experienced field geologist and entered into Excel spread sheets. Location and analysis data are then collated into a single Excel spread sheet. Data is stored on servers in the Company’s head office and consultants server, with regular backups and archival copies of the database made. |
|
| Discuss any adjustment to assay data | No adjustments are made to the data. |
| Criteria | JORC Code Explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Location of Data Points |
Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. |
Location data for soil sampling points was recorded by handheld GPS (+3m accuracy). Location data is downloaded from hand-held GPS using appropriate software. |
| Specification of the grid system used. | Coordinate system is UTM Zone 50 and datum is GDA94 |
|
| Quality and adequacy of topographic control | Topographic data was obtained from public download of the Youanmi 1:250,000 scale GSWA geologic map sheet. |
|
| Data spacing and distribution |
Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results | Soil samples were collected on a 500m x 75m nominal grid layout. |
| Whether the data spacing and distributions sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. |
Sample spacing was deemed appropriate for identifying geochemical anomalies but could not be used to establish geological and grade continuity. It would not be appropriate to use this information in a Mineral Resource or Ore Reserve estimation capacity |
|
| Whether sample compositing has been applied | No sample compositing has been applied. | |
| Orientation of data in relation to geological structure |
Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. |
Known mineralisation of V, Ti, and Fe occurs within the sample area and is oriented N-S to NE-SW. The Youanmi Fault runs through the tenement in a NNE orientation. Sampling was carried out on east-west traverses being close to perpendicular to mineralisation to achieve reletively unbiased sampling form these structural orientations and to cross-cut stratigraphy. |
| If the relationship between drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. |
Drilling was not conducted | |
| Sample security |
The measures taken to ensure sample security | Samples were collected and prepared in the field by an experiencedgeological consultant |
| Audits or reviews |
The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data |
To date there has not been an audit of sampling techniques and data. |
Section 2: Reporting of Exploration Results
(Criteria listed in previous section also apply to this section)
| Criteria | JORC Code Explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Mineral tenement and land tenure status |
Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. |
Property is 100% held by Black Ridge Mining Limited |
| The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. |
The Company is unaware of any risk to title or impediment to obtaining a licence to operate in the area at this time |
|
| Exploration done by other parties |
Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. |
Black Ridge Mining Limited conducted previous exploration work on the property to acceptable industry standard |
| Geology | Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. |
Vanadiferous titanomagnetite within the Atley Igneous Complex, a layerred mafic/ultramafic intrusion |
| Drill hole Information |
A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: (i) easting and northing of the drill hole collar (ii) elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar (iii) dip and azimuth of the hole o down hole length and interception depth(iv) hole length. |
Not applicable to single point data from soil sampling. |
| If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case. |
Not applicable to single point data from soil sampling. | |
| Data aggregation methods |
In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. |
Not applicable to single point data from soil sampling. |
| Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. |
Not applicable to single point data from soil sampling. | |
| The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated |
Not applicable to single point data from soil sampling. |
| Criteria | JORC Code Explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths |
These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results |
Not applicable to single point data from soil sampling. |
| If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. |
Not applicable to single point data from soil sampling. | |
| If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (e.g. ‘down hole length, true width not known’). |
Not applicable to single point data from soil sampling. | |
| Diagrams | Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views |
Not applicable to single point data from soil sampling. |
| Balanced Reporting |
Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results. |
Not applicable to single point data from soil sampling. |
| Other substantive exploration data |
Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances |
Not applicable to single point data from soil sampling. |
| Further work | The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g. tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out _drilling). _ |
A work program is currently in the planning stage for the next several rounds of exploration. It is likely to include infill MMI sampling with geophysical surveys followed by drilling |
| Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive. |
For diagrams refer to the body of this announcement |
Appendix 5B Mining exploration entity quarterly report
Rule 5.3
Appendix 5B
Mining exploration entity quarterly report
Introduced 01/07/96 Origin Appendix 8 Amended 01/07/97, 01/07/98, 30/09/01, 01/06/10, 17/12/10
Name of entity
BLACK RIDGE MINING NL
| ABN 48 083274024 |
Quarter ended (“current quarter”) |
|---|---|
| 48 083274024 | 30 September 2015 |
Consolidated statement of cash flows
| Cash flows related to operating activities 1.1 Receipts from product sales and related debtors 1.2 Payments for (a) exploration & evaluation (b) development (c) production (d) administration 1.3 Dividends received 1.4 Interest and other items of a similar nature received 1.5 Interest and other costs of finance paid 1.6 Income taxes paid 1.7 Other (provide details if material) Net Operating Cash Flows |
Current quarter $A’000 |
Year to date (3 months) $A’000 |
|---|---|---|
| (93) - (58) - - - - - |
(93) - (58) - - - - - |
|
| (151) | (151) | |
| Cash flows related to investing activities 1.8 Payment for purchases of: (a) prospects (b) equity investments (c) other fixed assets 1.9 Proceeds from sale of: (a) prospects (b) equity investments (c) other fixed assets 1.10 Loans to other entities 1.11 Loans repaid by other entities 1.12 Other (provide details if material) Net investing cash flows 1.13 Total operating and investing cash flows (carried forward) |
- - - - - - - - - |
- - - - - - - - - |
| - | - | |
| (151) | (151) |
- See chapter 19 for defined terms.
17/12/2010 Appendix 5B Page 1
Appendix 5B Mining exploration entity quarterly report
| 1.13 Total operating and investing cash flows (brought forward) |
(151) | (151) |
|---|---|---|
| Cash flows related to financing activities 1.14 Proceeds from issues of shares, options, etc. 1.15 Proceeds from sale of forfeited shares 1.16 Proceeds from borrowings 1.17 Repayment of borrowings 1.18 Dividends paid 1.19 Other (Placement fees) Net financing cash flows |
203 - - - - - |
203 - - - - - |
| 203 | 203 | |
| Net increase (decrease) in cash held 1.20 Cash at beginning of quarter/year to date 1.21 Exchange rate adjustments to item 1.20 1.22 Cash at end ofquarter |
52 15 - |
52 15 - |
| 67 | 67 |
Payments to directors of the entity and associates of the directors Payments to related entities of the entity and associates of the related entities
| 1.23 1.24 |
Aggregate amount of payments to the parties included in item 1.2 Aggregate amount of loans to the parties included in item 1.10 |
Current quarter $A'000 |
|---|---|---|
| - | ||
| - | ||
| 1.25 | Explanation necessaryfor an understandingof the transactions | |
Non-cash financing and investing activities
-
2.1 Details of financing and investing transactions which have had a material effect on consolidated assets and liabilities but did not involve cash flows
-
2.2 Details of outlays made by other entities to establish or increase their share in projects in which the reporting entity has an interest
-
See chapter 19 for defined terms.
Appendix 5B Page 2
17/12/2010
Appendix 5B Mining exploration entity quarterly report
Financing facilities available
Add notes as necessary for an understanding of the position.
| 3.1 Loan facilities 3.2 Credit standby arrangements |
Amount available $A’000 |
Amount used $A’000 |
|---|---|---|
| 100 | 100 | |
| - | - |
Estimated cash outflows for next quarter
| 4.1 | Exploration and evaluation |
|---|---|
| 4.2 | Development |
| 4.3 | Production |
| 4.4 | Administration |
| Total |
$A’000 10 - - 20 30
Reconciliation of cash
| Reconciliation of cash | ||
|---|---|---|
| Reconciliation of cash at the end of the quarter (as shown in the consolidated statement of cash flows) to the related items in the accounts is as follows. |
Current quarter $A’000 |
Previous quarter $A’000 |
| 5.1 Cash on hand and at bank 5.2 Deposits at call 5.3 Bank overdraft 5.4 Other (provide details) |
67 | 15 |
| - | - | |
| - | - | |
| - | - | |
| Total: cash at end of quarter(item 1.22) | 67 | 15 |
Changes in interests in mining tenements
| 6.1 Interests in mining tenements relinquished, reduced or lapsed 6.2 Interests in mining tenements acquired or increased |
Tenement reference |
Nature of interest (note (2)) |
Interest at beginning ofquarter |
Interest at end of quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|
- See chapter 19 for defined terms.
17/12/2010 Appendix 5B Page 3
Appendix 5B Mining exploration entity quarterly report
Issued and quoted securities at end of current quarter
Description includes rate of interest and any redemption or conversion rights together with prices and dates.
| Total number | Number quoted | Issue price per security (see note3) (cents) |
Amount paid up per security (see note3) (cents) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.1 Preference +securities (description) 7.2 Changes during quarter (a) Increases through issues (b) Decreases through returns of capital, buy- backs,redemptions |
||||
| 7.3 +Ordinary securities 7.4 Changes during quarter (a) Increases through issues (b) Decreases through returns of capital, buy- backs |
1,456,203,481 | 1,456,203,481 | ||
| 601,641,823 | 601,641,823 | |||
| 7.5 +Convertible debt securities(description) 7.6 Changes during quarter (a) Increases through issues (b) Decreases through securities matured, converted |
||||
| 7.7 Options (description and conversion factor) 7.8 Issued during quarter 7.9 Exercised during quarter 7.10 Expired during quarter |
Exercise price | Expiry date | ||
| 601,641,823 | 601,641,823 | $0.003 | 30 Nov 2016 | |
| 7.11 Debentures (totals only) |
||||
| 7.12 Unsecured notes (totals only) |
- See chapter 19 for defined terms.
Appendix 5B Page 4
17/12/2010
Appendix 5B Mining exploration entity quarterly report
Compliance statement
-
1 This statement has been prepared under accounting policies which comply with accounting standards as defined in the Corporations Act or other standards acceptable to ASX (see note 5).
-
2 This statement does give a true and fair view of the matters disclosed.
==> picture [82 x 34] intentionally omitted <==
Sign here: ............................................................ Date: 30 October 2015 Company Secretary
Print name: Graeme Smith
Notes
-
1 The quarterly report provides a basis for informing the market how the entity’s activities have been financed for the past quarter and the effect on its cash position. An entity wanting to disclose additional information is encouraged to do so, in a note or notes attached to this report.
-
2 The “Nature of interest” (items 6.1 and 6.2) includes options in respect of interests in mining tenements acquired, exercised or lapsed during the reporting period. If the entity is involved in a joint venture agreement and there are conditions precedent which will change its percentage interest in a mining tenement, it should disclose the change of percentage interest and conditions precedent in the list required for items 6.1 and 6.2.
-
3 Issued and quoted securities The issue price and amount paid up is not required in items 7.1 and 7.3 for fully paid securities .
-
4 The definitions in, and provisions of, AASB 6: Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources and AASB 107: Statement of Cash Flows apply to this report.
-
5 Accounting Standards ASX will accept, for example, the use of International Financial Reporting Standards for foreign entities. If the standards used do not address a topic, the Australian standard on that topic (if any) must be complied with.
== == == == ==
- See chapter 19 for defined terms.
17/12/2010 Appendix 5B Page 5