AI assistant
Studsvik — Annual Report 2008
Apr 7, 2009
3208_10-k_2009-04-07_9afd5a86-d4ff-48e9-9ee3-ec37175b06e0.pdf
Annual Report
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
Annual Report 2008
Information to shareholders
ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING APRIL 22, 2009
The Annual General Meeting will be held in Stockholm, World Trade Center, Klarabergsviadukten 70 / Kungsbron 1, on Wednesday, April 22, 2009, at 4 p.m.
Notification of attendance
Shareholders wishing to participate must be registered in the share register kept by Euroclear Sweden AB (formerly VPC AB) by April 16, 2009, and must give notification of their intention to attend by April 16 at the latest.
- By telephone +46 155 22 10 33,
- By mail to Studsvik AB, P.O. Box 556, SE-611 10 Nyköping, Sweden,
- By email to [email protected],
- By fax on +46 155 26 30 00, or
- Via Studsvik's website, www.studsvik.com.
The shareholder's notification should state
- Name
- Personal/corporate identity number
- Address and telephone number
- Number of shares
For entitlement to vote at the Annual General Meeting, shareholders with nominee-registered holdings must apply to the bank or broker managing their shares for temporary re-registration a couple of banking days before April 16, 2009.
Nomination committee
Studsvik's Nomination Committee consists of:
- Anders Oscarsson, SEB fonder (Chairman)
- Jan Barchan, Briban Invest, Member of the Board
- Frank Larsson, SHB fonder
- Anders Ullberg, Chairman of the Board
The task of the Nomination Committee is to submit proposals to the Annual General Meeting of shareholders regarding election of the Board of Directors, auditors and alternate auditors and their fees.
Nomination Committee's proposed Board of Directors
The Nomination Committee will propose to the AGM that the Members of the Board Jan Barchan, Ingemar Eliasson, Lars Engström, Anna Karinen, Alf Lindfors, Per Ludvigsson and Anders Ullberg be re-elected.
FORTHCOMING FINANCIAL INFORMATION
| ƒ Report on the first quarter as at March 31 | April 22, 2009 |
|---|---|
| ƒ Report on first half year as at June 30 | July 21, 2009 |
| ƒ Report on the three first quarters as at September 30 | November 2, 2009 |
| ƒ Year-end report 2009 | February 2010 |
| ƒ Annual report 2009 | April 2010 |
The reports will be available at www.studsvik.com on the publication dates. The Annual Report and half-year report will be sent to the shareholders by post.
Contents
| This is Studsvik | 2 |
|---|---|
| Confidence after a tough 2008 | 4 |
| Mission, objectives and strategies | 6 |
| Market | 8 |
| Business operations | 12 |
| Studsvik's offering | 14 |
| Organization and processes | 16 |
| Operating segments | 18 |
| Sweden | 18 |
| United Kingdom | 20 |
| Germany | 22 |
| USA | 24 |
| Global Services | 26 |
| Studsvik's corporate responsibility activities | 28 |
| Risks | 32 |
| The share | 35 |
| Administration report | 38 |
| Accounts | 45 |
| Consolidated income statement | 45 |
| Consolidated balance sheet | 46 |
| Consolidated cash flow statement | 48 |
| Parent company income statement | 49 |
| Parent company balance sheet | 50 |
| Parent company cash flow statement | 52 |
| Notes to the consolidated accounts | 53 |
| Notes to the parent company accounts | 74 |
| Audit report | 77 |
| Corporate governance | 78 |
| Board of Directors and auditors | 82 |
| Executive Group Management | 84 |
| Five-year review | 86 |
| Definitions of key figures and ratios | 88 |
This is Studsvik
Studsvik offers a range of advanced technical services to the international nuclear power industry in waste treatment, decommissioning, engineering and services, and operating efficiency. In more than 60 years in the industry Studsvik has developed into a leading edge company with services covering the whole lifecycle of a nuclear power plant.
The company has modern facilities for treatment of low and intermediate level waste, which enables waste treatment that is economically and environmentally superior to direct disposal. Studsvik also has qualified laboratories for testing irradiated and non-irradiated material.
Nuclear technology is a growing and dynamic industry today. New technology is improving efficiency in nuclear power plants and enabling better environmental and safety management. This positive development of nuclear power coincides with many countries currently working actively to reduce dependency on fossil energy sources such as oil, coal and gas. Major price changes and increased focus on climate impact are augmenting this trend. The renaissance of nuclear power has triggered a consolidation where many companies are striving to strengthen their positions.
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) predicts that production of nuclear-generated electricity can have doubled by 2030. The increase is expected to take place through modernization, new-build and replacement of old reactors by new ones. Growth is following a clear trend, but due to the industry's dependence on decisions by public authorities it is sometimes difficult to assess in the short term.
2008 iN BRIEF
The cover picture was taken when a steam generator was being cut.
- Sweden performed well, with good growth and an operating profit that exceeded 2007
- In the United Kingdom waste treatment continued to grow, but decommissioning projects at Sellafield reduced profits by SEK 6 million
- A decision was made to build a facility for treatment of metallic waste in the United Kingdom. The facility will become operational in mid-2009.
- Growth in the consulting operations and good capacity utilization in engineering and services contributed to strong earnings in Germany
- In the USA the Erwin facility was very busy until the end of June, when the only repository for intermediate level waste in the USA closed. The Erwin facility was then temporarily taken out of operation.
- Studsvik launched a new business model for the treatment of intermediate level waste in the USA. Three customer contracts had been signed at the close of 2008. The Erwin facility will resume normal operation in the first quarter of 2009.
- There was a positive trend in materials technology but low software sales. Earnings for Global Services were slightly lower than in 2007.
- The consulting operations in Global Services were reinforced through the acquisition of the Swedish consultancy company ALARA Holding
- The Board of Directors proposes a dividend of SEK 1.00 (2.00) per share for 2008
| Key ratios | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net sales, SEK million | 1,285.9 | 1,314.7 | 1,219.6 |
| Operating profit, SEK million | 12.7 | 62.1 | 71.3 |
| Profit after net financial items, SEK million | 0.7 | 46.0 | 57.1 |
| Earnings per share before dilution, SEK | –0.05 | 5.65 | 4.24 |
| Earnings per share after dilution, SEK | –0.05 | 5.65 | 4.24 |
| Operating margin, % | 1.0 | 4.7 | 5.8 |
| Equity-assets ratio, % | 40.4 | 42.5 | 41.2 |
| Equity per share, SEK | 74.32 | 69.58 | 67.97 |
| Average number of employees | 1,130 | 1,141 | 1,279 |
STUDSVIK'S OPERATING SEGMENTS
| Segment | Sales Percentage of total segment sales |
Operating margin | Employees Percentage of Group total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 12.6% | 20.1% | 6.9% |
| United Kingdom |
12.4% | neg | 7.6% |
| Germany | 32.3% | 6.0% | 52.6% |
| USA | 26.4% | neg | 13.8% |
| Global Services |
16.3% | 6.6% | 11.4% |
Confidence after a tough 2008
At the start of 2008 Studsvik was facing major challenges in the USA. Stiff competition characterized the market for low level waste and at the end of June the repository for intermediate level waste at Barnwell was to close, which would have a negative effect on our facility in Erwin. Unfortunately it took us all year to overcome these challenges, with a negative impact on 2008 earnings. However, substantial restructuring combined with getting a new business model in place just before the end of the year mean that we are now considerably better equipped for the future in the USA.
Our young operations in the UK suffered some growing pains in the form of losses in two major projects, which brought down both sales and earnings. We have learned from these experiences and in future will be working closer to both customers and public authorities to ensure efficiency and profitability in complex decommissioning projects.
Major changes in the USA
In the USA we restructured operations in Erwin and Memphis to restore them to profitability.
We launched a completely new business model for the operations in Erwin and in less than a year succeeded in transforming it into a functioning business. The way there has meant many contacts with various state authorities, major efforts to develop a structure for contracts, cooperation and remuneration to suit both our customers and partners, while at the same time allowing us to continue our main business in Erwin; treating waste. Before our customers were prepared to accept the model it was scrutinized from a legal, economic and safety perspective. The fact that we signed the first contracts at the end of the year meant that we had introduced a completely new model for treating intermediate level waste in the USA in record time.
Just now the new business model is a prerequisite, not only for us but for the entire industry, for being able to treat intermediate level waste in the USA at all. We expect more customers to sign contracts so that the facility in Erwin can be run at a good profit.
We also restructured the operations in Memphis. The effectiveness of the treatment of low level waste was substantially increased, doubling the percentage that can be treated as conventional waste without needing to be deposited as radioactive. The transport and logistics operations were encumbered by falling demand for transport and high diesel prices. In the current economic climate we decided in the spring to scale down operations.
A maturing British market
The British market has very high growth but is less mature than other markets where Studsvik operates, which means that customers, suppliers and public authorities more often create solutions as they go. Since the establishment of the British Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) in 2004 the market has developed rapidly, but it is not unusual to encounter temporary setbacks in individual projects, which also happened to us in the past year. With our long experience of the industry Studsvik has in three years created a strong market position, both through our own work and through our participation in the NWM consortium for low level waste.
The UK operations continued to grow in 2008, but energy also went into creating internal conditions for continued growth in coming years. In 2008 a total of 300 tonnes of British waste was sent to Sweden for treatment, signifying that this operation has reached commercial volumes. In 2009 we expect to double these volumes. When our new facility in Workington opens its doors in the second quarter of 2009, Studsvik will have a comprehensive system for treatment and storage of low and intermediate level waste in the UK.
Studsvik is growing with new services
Our initiative to treat steam generators and other large components has resulted in substantial operations in Sweden. Our methods are continually developing, which means that today we are able to give radiological clearance to increasingly large parts of the components, while treatment has become more effective. In 2008 Sweden also developed processes to incinerate contaminated oil
Studsvik's President, Magnus Groth, and the head of the Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Sohei Akada signing a cooperation agreement on research and development in waste treatment and radioactive material testing.
and treat cable material, which makes us an even more complete supplier.
Materials technology in Global Services started longterm cooperation with British Energy. The British company must by law analyze certain quantities of reactor fuel per year. Studsvik expects to analyze considerable amounts of fuel on a regular basis from 2009 onwards on behalf of British Energy. The cooperation signifies an important step towards increasing capacity utilization in materials technology.
Another milestone for us in 2008 was that segment Germany opened an office in France, which after the USA is the world's largest nuclear power nation. The intention is to provide consulting and decommissioning services to the French nuclear power industry. A local presence gives Studsvik the ability to build up a position in this very interesting market too.
Studsvik operates in an industry that influences and concerns the rest of the world and which is also carefully regulated and supervised. Most of our business is aimed at reducing the environmental impact of nuclear power. With such a position it is important to apply systematic corporate responsibility. In 2008 we enhanced this work by initiating a dialog with representatives of employees, customers, authorities, nearby residents, the financial market and the media to identify which issues we should be examining and giving priority to. You can read more about this in the annual report and the corporate responsibility report we will present in May.
Increased interest in nuclear power
Nuclear power is experiencing a renaissance and the positive market trend is intensifying. New nuclear power plants are being planned in Europe, North America and rapidly growing economies in Asia. In Sweden nuclear power plants are being modernized to supply more electricity. When building new facilities, consideration is given to the entire cycle of a nuclear power plant, with detailed plans for how operational waste is to be dealt with and how future decommissioning is to be done. This is a trend that benefits Studsvik.
It is as yet unclear how our industry will be affected by the financial crisis and the weaker economy. Historically the industry has had relatively low cyclical sensitivity, but lower electricity prices and the wish to retain liquid funds may dampen growth in the industry somewhat without interrupting the long-term growth trend. As an independent supplier of nuclear services Studsvik is well-positioned.
Profitability in focus for 2009
I expect 2009 to be a year of consolidation with a focus on profitability. We will also continue to grow, but growth will not require capital-intensive investments. It will mainly come through using our facilities more and continuing to develop our consulting business.
Nyköping in February 2009
Magnus Groth President and CEO
Mission, objectives and strategies
Studsvik's mission is to supply specialist services characterized by innovation, efficiency and safety to the international nuclear power industry. The Group does this by offering services mainly in waste, decommissioning, engineering and services and operating efficiency.
To enable handling, radioactive material must be transported in special containers.
Financial targets
Studsvik is to grow organically and through acquisitions with sustained profitability. This is reflected in the Group's financial targets, which are seen in a three-year perspective:
- Organic growth in net sales should be at least 10 per cent per year
- The operating margin should be at least 8 per cent
- The equity-assets ratio should be at least 40 per cent
Financial targets by segment
As of 2008 Studsvik's segment reporting will be based on the operative organization. The segments operate in different environments, on account of the different breakdown of sales between services, the maturity of the market, competition, etc. Separate targets have therefore been formulated for the operating margin of each segment. These targets also have a three-year perspective:
- Sweden 20 per cent
- United Kingdom 10 per cent
- Germany 9 per cent
- USA 10 per cent
- Global Services 15 per cent
Business objectives
In addition to the financial targets, Studsvik has also formulated six specific business objectives for 2009:
- Create sustainable profitability in the American operations by contracting for treatment of intermediate level waste for a large percentage of the nuclear power plants in the USA
- Increase the long-term order book in all segments with a view to reducing dips in capacity utilization caused by delayed decision-making or licensing processes
- Improve logistics efficiency in the facility for treatment of metallic waste
- Expand the materials technology operations, for example by cooperation with British Energy
- Establish the facility in Workington as the leader in treatment of metallic waste in the UK
- Create stable profitability in the UK by reducing dependency on individual projects
Growth strategy
Demand for nuclear engineering services is increasing in many markets. Studsvik is strengthening its position in priority markets through organic growth in combination with alliances and acquisitions.
Nettoomsättning Operating margin
Rörelsemarginal Equity-assets ratio
FOLLOW-UP OF BUSINESS OBJECTIVES FOR 2008
Expansion of long-term order book
The order book improved in parts of the organization, but is not satisfactory as a whole. A long-term orderbook creates greater flexibility and better staying power, as Studsvik operates in a market characterized by long decision-making processes that in many cases also include extensive processing by public authorities, where delays
Minimal outage or shutdowns at the Group's production facilities
The Group's facilities have had few outages or shutdowns during the year.
Sustained rapid growth in the United Kingdom
Revenues in the United Kingdom segment increased in 2008 by 15.1 per cent to SEK 148.6 million. Operations were negatively affected by substantial delays in two major projects at Sellafield, with the consequence that growth did not match Studsvik's expectations.
Completion of new waste
treatment facility in the UK
Building started in 2008 and the facility will be brought into operation in the second quarter of 2009.
Higher profitability in the USA
Profitability in the USA was negatively affected by the Erwin facility being at a standstill in the second half of 2008. However, a new business model was established for the facility during the year. With all licenses in place for the new model and customer contracts Studsvik has good prospects of reporting profitability in the USA in 2009. The Memphis-based operations were restructured. Waste treatment in Memphis is now profitable, while the logistics operations, which are also dependent on the general economic climate and fuel price levels, continued to have profitability problems.
Continued cutting-edge expertise by means of competence development and hirings
Besides individual competence development, training was carried out in 2008 to strengthen marketing and sales competencies. The acquisition of ALARA strengthened the knowledge advantage in Global Services.
Products and services strategy
The Group is focusing on products and services that strengthen the customers' profitability, help to improve safety and make it easier for customers to be environmentally accountable. Studsvik has a long tradition of maintaining a high innovation rate and develops its own technology and methods on the basis of the customers' requirements.
Market strategy
Studsvik has long experience of doing business in geographical markets with high barriers to entry. As a consequence, it has created a strong position in these markets, providing a platform for continued development of its offering there.
Studsvik has a strong global market position in some niche activities. This geographical spread can be utilized when more full-scale establishments in individual new markets are being considered. These establishments in new geographical markets will take place when demand for Studsvik's services is deemed sufficient.
Partnership strategy
Studsvik operates independently on the market and develops proprietary services in close cooperation with customers and public authorities. When developing new services or when bidding for major projects Studsvik's competitiveness can be strengthened by strategic partnerships, either with highly specialized niche players or global enterprises.
Organizatorial strategy
Studsvik's organization typically has short decision lines and a clear geographical management structure with a sharp focus on profitability and customer satisfaction. The business is run in five operating segments with their own geographical areas of responsibility. The company's services are marketed within the framework of Groupwide Key Offerings.
Market
The renaissance being experienced by the global nuclear power industry is evident in plans for new nuclear power plants and modernization of older facilities. Waste and decommissioning are also becoming more important from an economic and environmental perspective.
Material being analyzed in a water chemistry laboratory in Studsvik.
Nuclear technology is a growing and dynamic industry today. New technological solutions, both for new nuclear power plants and for facilities in operation and being decommissioned, are improving the efficiency and safety of nuclear power. This development is a consequence of many countries working actively to reduce their dependency on fossil energy sources such as oil, coal and gas. Major price changes and increased focus on the climate impact of fossil energy sources are augmenting this trend. This has triggered a consolidation in which many companies are striving to strengthen their positions by broadening or deepening their operations and also increase market presence.
Studsvik is a leading edge player that supplies specialist services to the nuclear power industry. Several factors contribute to growth in this market:
- Building new reactors
- Modernizing existing reactors
- Decommissioning older reactors
- Shortage of storage facilities for low and intermediate level waste and high storage costs
- Management of waste and facilities from civil and military research programs
The majority of Studsvik's revenues are generated by the commercial nuclear power industry. This includes nuclear power plants in operation, being built or decommissioned and reactor and fuel manufacturers. There are 439 powergenerating reactors in operation in the world and 36 new reactors under construction. The world's largest nuclear nations are the USA, France and Japan with 104, 58 and 55 reactors respectively. The percentage of nuclear-generated electricity supply varies considerably from country to country. In France nuclear power accounts for three quarters of the electricity supply, while it is a quarter in Germany, a fifth in the USA and less than a sixth in the UK.
Nuclear-generated electricity may double by 2030
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) predicts that production of nuclear-generated electricity may have doubled by 2030. The increase is expected to result from modernizations, completely new construction and replacement of old facilities with new ones. Most of the 36 new reactors that are under construction are being built in China, India and Russia. Another 81 reactors are at the planning stage. Plants designed today have detailed
plans for their entire lifecycle; from operational waste to decommissioning. Sweden has one of the world's largest modernization programs comprising seven reactors. In Sweden the same amount of electricity is generated today by ten reactors as was generated before by twelve when Barsebäck was operating.
It is planned to close twelve reactors before 2012, five of which are in Germany, four in the UK and one each in France, Japan and Slovakia. Many countries have also started to deal with facilities and waste from the 1950s and 1960s, when the first power-generating reactor types were developed. Military waste from facilities, nuclear submarines and older nuclear weapons are often included in this category. In the infancy of nuclear power the view of waste management was less developed than it is now, which means that management of parts of this waste is a challenge even with current technology.
To be seen as a safe, environmentally friendly and effective source of energy the industry must manage to treat residual products and waste in a responsible way. Just as for other industry, responsibility covers the entire lifecycle, from the first design phase, via modernizations in the operating phase to decommissioning and restoration of land used. The nuclear power industry has made major progress in these areas in recent years and Studsvik has often been at the forefront.
The nuclear power plants that are in operation work continually on improving their operating efficiency and optimizing power extraction from the fuel. For these needs Studsvik has developed services in niches such as software for fuel optimization and core monitoring and various laboratory tests of fuel and material.
The shutdown of a reactor today does not necessarily mean the start of decommissioning. In some countries nuclear power plants are allowed to remain shut down for decades to allow the radioactivity to decay before decommissioning is started. Public authorities and the public are now increasingly calling for reactors to be decommissioned and not just shut down, particularly in densely populated areas.
There are several strong reasons in favor of starting decommissioning as soon as possible. More and more people are realizing that it is important to start decommissioning when there is still access to staff with specific knowledge of and operative experience of the facility in question. Nuclear power plants are complex facilities and it is necessary to have detailed and correct information to be able to handle decommissioning responsibly. One sign of the times is that the UK, that developed its nuclear power early, has now started extensive decommissioning programs for reactors that have long been shut down in order to make room for new nuclear power plants.
DIFFERENT TYPES OF WASTE
Waste can consist of protective clothing, decommissioning waste, replaced reactor parts or residual products from medical care. It is treated in different ways depending on the degree of radioactivity. Some waste can be radiologically cleared directly and then recycled. Other parts of the waste are treated using different methods and then sent for final disposal.
Studsvik treats low and intermediate level waste at its facilities. Metallic waste is decontaminated, segmented and melted. In that way the radioactivity is separated from the metals and the amount of residual waste minimized. In large components such as reactor vessel heads and steam generators up to 95 per cent of the material can be recycled in industry. Dry organic waste such as protective clothing, plastic and paper is reduced in volume by incineration.
1. Operating waste
As much as 85 per cent of waste arises in operation. Most of the operating waste is classified as low and intermediate level waste. The low level waste does not need to be shielded and can be transported in normal containers. The intermediate level waste needs shielding and is cast in concrete or steel containers. The waste is often treated to reduce volume. Studsvik's processes also stabilize waste for final disposal.
2. Decommissioning waste
Dismantling nuclear power plants gives rise to large amounts of metal scrap and concrete residue. Most of it, just like the operational waste, is low and intermediate level. Some parts of the decommissioning waste, such as fuel rods and other core components, are classed as long-lived and must be isolated for thousands of years.
3. Spent nuclear fuel
Spent fuel is classed as high level and accounts for the smallest part of the waste. This is shielded and cooled down during treatment, transport and storage. Nuclear fuel is at present put into intermediate storage encased in a few decimeters of steel, both above and below ground, to cool it and allow the radiation to decay. Intermediate storage is sometimes in pools at the nuclear power plants. After about 30 years the fuel can be sent for final disposal. The methods and facilities that are under development for final disposal are based on geological storage at great depths.
Trends at public authorities
Supervisory authorities focus today on issues concerning safety and physical protection to prevent nuclear facilities from being used for terrorism.
In the field of waste there were changes in several countries in 2008. In the USA large parts of the nuclear power industry were left with no alternative for storing intermediate level waste after the facility in Barnwell, South Carolina, was closed to virtually all market players. At the end of 2008 Studsvik introduced a solution to this problem which was well received by customers. However, there is a continued need to address the issue of storage of low and intermediate level waste in the USA, but this is complicated by the lack of a central decision-making authority. Decisions are often made at state level.
In the UK the interest of public authorities is increasing with regard to volume reduction of waste, since the low level waste repository will soon be full.
In Europe there are signals that more countries are abandoning the idea that each country should manage its own waste. Finland gave the all-clear to treat low and intermediate level waste in Sweden and in France there is also a clear interest in treating such waste abroad. Final disposal of radioactive residual products is, however, always in the country in which the radioactivity arose.
The British NDA's "waste pyramid" shows the authority's policy for how radioactive waste should be handled in six steps. The principle for radioactive waste is that it is to be prevented or reduced at source as far as possible, to secure the conservation of nature and resources. When this is not possible the waste or products must be recycled or treated so that they can be used again.
Market participants
There is a large number of subcontractors to the nuclear power industry. The largest are reactor manufacturers, which often also supply fuel, and companies that manage waste and storage. Others supply various consulting services, software for operation and core monitoring, equipment, tools and support. Studsvik is a leading-edge company that operates in several of these areas.
The greatest competitor in waste treatment is quite simply the failure to treat waste, sending it instead directly for storage or final disposal. Large parts of the waste are still handled in that way, but a growing number are choosing some form of treatment, both for economic and environmental reasons. Like Studsvik, those who are involved in waste treatment often have a history in the nuclear power industry in their domestic market. Among the few international players are Studsvik, the American company EnergySolutions and the French company Nuvia. In some countries there are individual local players, such as Energie Werke Nord (EWN) in Germany, but the majority are small local players that offer certain services in waste management and companies offering intermediate storage and final disposal.
In decommissioning it is common to have large contract solutions offered by contractors and technical consultants. However, few of them have comprehensive specialist knowledge of nuclear technology, so Studsvik can cooperate with them on decommissioning contracts. In operating efficiency Studsvik's software is by far the most predominant in the world market, with about half of the world's power generating reactors as customers. Other suppliers are the fuel suppliers themselves, such as GE, Westinghouse and AREVA. In materials testing Studsvik is the only commercial company with competition mainly from public sector research organizations.
Business operations
Studsvik is a leading supplier of specialist services to the international nuclear power industry. Customers consist mainly of operators of nuclear power plants and other nuclear facilities. A nuclear power plant can be a customer of Studsvik throughout its lifecycle.
Studsvik offers specialist services to the international nuclear power industry in four areas: waste treatment, decommissioning, engineering and services, and operating efficiency. Studsvik has developed a broad and competitive portfolio of services for nuclear facilities in operation or being decommissioned. A nuclear power plant can be a customer of Studsvik throughout its lifecycle. Operations have concentrated increasingly on waste treatment and decommissioning, which in 2008 accounted for 70 per cent of Studsvik's sales. In recent years there have been major investments in these areas through acquisitions and substantial investment in new geographical markets. Engineering and services offer a growing range of consulting services to nuclear power plants in operation.
The business is conducted through five operating segments:
- Sweden
- United Kingdom
- Germany
- USA
- Global Services
Global Services comprises the operating efficiency area of operations. This is the Group's most research-intensive area of operations, including software for fuel optimization and specialist services in materials technology and fuel analysis. It has the largest geographical distribution and operates in most geographical markets in the world.
Studsvik's services are based on a very well defined offering with a high degree of harmonization with customers' specific requirements. Studsvik currently markets eleven key offerings:
- Processing of radioactive waste
- On-site waste services
- Engineering and consultancy
- Health physics services
- Transport logistics
- Decommissioning services
- Operational and outage support
- Fuel and materials performance
- Materials integrity and water chemistry
- Nuclear fuel analysis software
- Design and build
These key offerings are described in detail on the next page.
Studsvik treats metallic waste from the nuclear power industry; stainless steel, carbon steel, copper, aluminum and lead. After various stages of segmentation and sorting the metals are melted. About 90 per cent is radiologically cleared and then reused in industry in the same way as normal metal scrap.
Studsvik's offering
Studsvik offers a broad and competitive portfolio of services for nuclear facilities in operation or being decommissioned. Our offering reflects customers' needs and includes waste management, decommissioning, engineering and services, and operating efficiency. The company has developed eleven key offerings in these areas.
Processing of radioactive waste
Studsvik offers treatment of low and intermediate level waste at its own facilities in Studsvik outside Nyköping in Sweden, and in Erwin and Memphis, Tennessee in the USA. Another facility for recovery of metallic waste is being built in Workington, UK, where Studsvik is licensed to process low level waste. The facilities in Studsvik process dry and metallic waste, mainly from nuclear facilities in Europe, by incineration and melting. The facility in Erwin, Tennessee, treats wet waste using the unique Studsvik-developed pyrolysis process THORSM. In Memphis, Tennessee, low level waste is reduced in volume using other methods. The purpose of waste treatment is mainly to achieve volume reduction and stabilization of waste before final disposal.
On-site waste services
Waste treatment is also carried out at customers' own sites; for example characterization, sorting and packaging of waste, stabilization and solidification of wet waste, compacting of dry waste and measurement of radioactivity in waste before treatment and recycling.
Engineering and consultancy
Studsvik, with its long and broad experience of the industry, offers expert support in nuclear engineering, for example in waste management and decommissioning and related areas, such as health physics and environmental issues. Studsvik also offers engineering and advisory services covering design, nuclear safety, fuels, core and materials.
Health physics services
Personnel at nuclear facilities are at risk of exposure to ionizing radiation. When working in classified environments radiation levels are always measured and steps taken to minimize radiation doses. Studsvik offers health physics services, including supervision and planning, and services personal dosimeters, which are instruments that register radiation doses.
Transport logistics
Transporting radioactive material is subject to strict national and international regulatory frameworks. Studsvik transports waste and other material to and from customer facilities in the UK, Sweden and the USA. Transport is by road, rail, air and sea. In the USA transport is largely in Studsvik's own trucks.
Decommissioning services
The decommissioning process is long and complicated. Studsvik's services cover everything from feasibility studies, planning and project management to practical dismantling and subsequent waste management.
Operational and outage support
Service and maintenance requirements in a nuclear power plant are substantial. All systems and components in classified environments need frequent maintenance and cleaning to guarantee safe operation throughout the lifetime of the facility. Services include mechanical servicing, decontamination (removal of radioactivity) and general property maintenance at nuclear facilities.
Fuel and materials performance
Both fuel rods and other material associated with a reactor are subject to severe strain during operation. To ensure that fuel and fuel cladding retain the properties required for secure and stable operation for as long as possible these properties are tested in Studsvik's laboratories. Tests of materials to check durability in various operational situations and conditions over the full lifecycle are also conducted in Studsvik's own laboratories. Studsvik also offers tests in a reactor environment in collaboration with the Institute for Energy Technology, IFE, in Norway.
Materials integrity and water chemistry
Crack growth measurements and other corrosion studies are conducted on non-irradiated and irradiated material in order to reduce fuel and material related operational disruptions, secure the service life of materials and counteract and reduce radioactive dose loads in nuclear power plants.
Nuclear fuel analysis software
Fuel is a significant cost item for nuclear power plants, and so there are sizeable gains to be made from optimizing fuel efficiency. This is done using computerized reactor operating efficiency software. Studsvik's software is a world leader and includes applications for in-core fuel management, core monitoring, transient analysis, simulators and analyzing spent nuclear fuel. The software is used for both licensing and design of light water reactors and real time calculations for reactor operation.
Design and build
Studsvik can take overall responsibility for designing and supplying solutions for new nuclear power plants and other nuclear facilities and also performs upgrades and modernization of existing facilities. Studsvik has unique and industry leading competence in waste facilities, special equipment for dismantling, as well as ventilation systems. The company also manufactures equipment according to specifications for new nuclear power plants.
Organization and processes
Studsvik's organization typically has short decision lines and a businesslike approach, with emphasis on innovation, efficiency and safety. In recent years the business has become more international, and has at the same time been streamlined around a small number of integrated offerings for the nuclear power industry.
Organization
Studsvik has offices and subsidiaries in eight countries around the world and operates in many more. The Group has more than 1,100 employees, most of them outside Sweden. The CEO, some of the Executive Group Management and central Group functions for administration, accounting and business development as well as HR, quality, environment, safety and technology are all located at the head office in Nyköping. The Group's subsidiaries are responsible for operations in their respective geographical markets, which form the operating segments used in the Group's reporting system.
The Executive Group Management consists of the CEO, the CFO, who is the deputy CEO, the segment heads and the heads of the central Group functions.
Studsvik has its own facilities outside Nyköping in Sweden and in Memphis and Erwin in Tennessee, USA. Another facility is under construction in Workington in the UK.
The business is based on a strong safety culture and high quality awareness. This requires well documented and functioning processes.
Operating segments
As of January 1, 2008 the business reporting is based on five operating segments: Sweden, United Kingdom, Germany, USA and Global Services. The new segment structure sharpens the organization's focus on individual markets and at the same time creates a clear picture of the Group's operations and development.
CENTRAL BUSINESS PROCESSES Quality, safety, environment and health
There are common working practices and procedures within the Group that enable information on needs, problems and successes to be picked up and communicated between different parts of the organization. Systematic quality management is conducted within the Group, which enables integrated and consistent communication. Information can be interpreted and evaluated to achieve best practice throughout the organization.
Major disparities are reported in a Groupwide system, which increases transparency and gives clear signals to the organization. Data on environment, safety and health is reported monthly, which makes it possible to continually analyze developments in these areas and identify disparities early. If there is an incident an analysis of causes is distributed within the Group to benefit from experience and avoid recurrence.
Studsvik's operations in Sweden, the UK and Germany are ISO 9000 and ISO 14000 certified, which means that the processes are documented. The Group's operations in other countries are certified under other standards, such as ASME NQA-1 in the USA.
Studsvik is expanding both organically and via acquisitions, which means that new employees and organizations are regularly becoming part of the Group. An important part of the integration of new employees and acquisitions is to maintain and develop value-generating and business critical processes with retained coordination between the various parts of the organization. New employees follow an introduction plan, with information on the company, safety and an introduction to the relevant workplace, including work in a radioactive environment.
Studsvik works continually on improving and developing documentation and communication on Groupwide business processes in the organization. The most important are described in brief below.
Research and development
Innovation and technical development are key competitive devices for Studsvik. Technical and methods development are normally based on specific customer requirements, and are subsequently applied in a wider commercial context. All research and development in the Group represents knowledge capital that is managed, developed and made available in the Group.
Studsvik's research and development costs have varied in the past five years between SEK 35 million and SEK 45 million. In 2008 the main part was spent in the Global Services segment, above all on maintenance and development of software for in-core fuel management.
Internal systems for knowledge transfer make most research reports and other material searchable and easy to access. Studsvik conducts research and development as part of its own operations and in joint projects with customers in the nuclear power industry. Pure contract research in nuclear engineering is also conducted. This leads to specific solutions for the customer in question, whose needs may be complex. The solutions may often be developed at the next stage into more flexible services that are offered to Studsvik's other customers.
Business development
Studsvik's business development processes regarding investments, acquisitions, alliances and collaboration are well-documented in manuals and other policy documents. This sustains the tempo of the decision-making process without compromising on quality.
Recruitment and skills development
Studsvik is a knowledge-intensive service company that operates in an international market. The renewed interest in nuclear power increases competition for qualified employees. The supply of people with relevant competence and experience is also strongly affected by how the local nuclear power industry in each country is developing.
Studsvik's local organizations reflect these variations. At the same time the Group aims to be consistent as regards skills and continuing professional development. A project is in progress to survey skills and supply of staff for the different parts of the Group. The project is to form the basis of a plan for how the Group is to manage competence and leadership. The plan will be based on principles of best practice. Already now there is extensive exchange of experience within the Group, but the plan will include measures to increase internal mobility.
Sales and marketing
The customer focus of the operations is of central importance to the company's development and growth. Each segment has its own sales organization. All the Group's services are marketed by the individual segments. The sales organizations must cooperate when technology developed in one segment is marketed by another. Effective coordination of these functions requires a high level of clear and well-documented goals and strategies that are regularly evaluated and revised.
The Group operates under a uniform profile and brand platform with central guidelines and resources for market communication. Groupwide customer meetings and trade fair participation are implemented on the initiative of either the Executive Group Management or individual companies.
Project management
Many of Studsvik's contracts are carried out as projects. The mix of resources and competence is adapted in each project for optimum fulfillment of the contract requirements. The projects are managed by means of documentation and reporting in accordance with given guidelines before, during and after project completion. Qualified project management is particularly important in the case of on-site projects, since quality assurance and knowledge transfer are more difficult to implement than in projects conducted at Studsvik's own facilities.
Sweden
Sweden is performing well and aiming at continued growth through participating in the modernization of Swedish nuclear power plants and the British decommissioning program. Treatment of large components, introduced a couple of years ago, has attracted great interest and this area of operations is growing.
Leif Andersson, head of segment Sweden
Business overview
Low and intermediate level waste is treated in the Swedish facilities to reduce volume, stabilize the final product and recycle valuable material. Material that is radiologically cleared goes back to industry as raw material.
Metallic material is decontaminated, segmented and melted, which enables the radioactivity to be separated and the amount of radioactive waste product minimized. Metals are recycled after a rigorous free-release procedure. Large components, such as steam generators and reactor vessel heads, are treated so that large parts of them can be free released.
Dry organic waste such as protective clothing, plastic and paper is reduced in volume by incineration. Incineration minimizes the waste and converts it to ash that is returned to the customer. Studsvik applies an incineration technique that entails emissions to the environment at levels far below the authorities' threshold values.
The facility at Studsvik is on the east coast of Sweden and has its own harbor, which makes it easily accessible for transport, which is a great advantage when transporting large components. In order of size, customers are from Germany, Sweden, the UK and other countries in Europe with nuclear power.
The nuclear power industry's most common alternative to sending waste to Studsvik for treatment is to send the untreated waste for final disposal or intermediate storage. Interest in processing waste is increasing as storage costs rise and commitment to environment and sustainability issues grows.
Comments on the year
Sales and earnings improved in 2008. All production facilities had good capacity utilization.
Studsvik's treatment method for steam generators progressed well. Interest from customers both in and outside Europe is great. These large components have previously been sent directly for final disposal or been stored temporarily at the nuclear power plants. Using Studsvik's method, up to 90 per cent of the component volume can be free released, which dramatically reduces the amount of waste that must be sent for final disposal. The size of the steam generators varies between different nuclear power plants, from around 100 tonnes to over 300 tonnes. Nuclear power plants change steam generators as part of regular maintenance and when they are modernized.
Studsvik is currently treating steam generators from Germany and Sweden. In early 2009 treatment of three steam generators from Ringhals will start, an order worth SEK 34 million.
In 2008 Studsvik developed a method for oil incineration and was also granted regulatory licensing for routine incineration of oil. The oil that is used in reactors contains radioactive particles and must therefore be dealt with after changes. A method for recycling cable, in which plastic and metal are separated, was also launched during the year.
The orderbook for 2009 is good. Waste volumes from Swedish customers will increase as a consequence of modernization of reactors, giving rise to large quantities of metallic material. In 2009 the British Metals Recycling Facility (MRF) will be brought into operation, which will open the way for increased metal volumes for the Group as a whole. Studsvik can offer a package concept, where simpler treatment is done locally in the UK, while material requiring more qualified treatment is sent to Sweden. Germany will continue to be an important market with a high percentage of the segment's total volumes.
Studsvik has agreed with OKG to treat 1,400 tonnes of metallic waste from the modernization of the Oskarshamn reactor 3, for a total of SEK 28 million. OKG has reported that the project will start in March 2009.
A boring machine will be brought into operation in 2009 at the Metals Recycling Facility (MRF). The machine will be used to remove induced activity by cutting part of the goods. The boring machine means that material can be handled with greater precision than is possible when blasting. The method will be used when treating large components.
See page 15 for a description of key offerings
| Key ratios | 2008 | 2007 |
|---|---|---|
| Net sales, SEK million | 152.4 | 135.4 |
| Operating profit, SEK million | 30.7 | 28.2 |
| Operating margin, % | 20.1 | 20.8 |
| Investments, SEK million | 7.8 | 33.9 |
| Average number of employees | 78 | 78 |
During the year Studsvik received several steam generators from Ringhals. The steam generators will be treated in Studsvik's facility for large components to recover as much as possible of the metals and minimize the amount of waste.
United Kingdom
The British market is growing fast with extensive decommissioning programs for facilities that are part of the historical legacy from the early years of nuclear power. Plans for new nuclear power plants are also taking shape. With growth of 15 per cent, 2008 was a year of consolidation for United Kingdom.
Mark Lyons, head of segment United Kingdom
Business overview
Studsvik successfully entered the UK market in 2005 and has established itself as a leading player in decommissioning and waste treatment. Studsvik is currently broadening its offering to engineering and consulting services and is seeking customers from different parts of the market to balance its significant contracts with the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA).
Operations are mainly conducted at the customers' facilities and waste is also transported to the Swedish waste facility for treatment. Work is underway to construct a Metals Recycling Facility (MRF) in Workington for treatment of metallic waste. The new facility is expected to open in mid-2009.
With a total annual budget of GBP 2.8 billion, the NDA continues to be Studsvik's largest customer in the United Kingdom. Initially the NDA contract was for "high hazard projects" involving removal of waste considered to pose a high environmental risk from nuclear power plants, processing and research facilities. Most of the measures related to Sellafield, one of Europe's largest nuclear facilities. Studsvik's assignments subsequently broadened to encompass regular decommissioning and waste treatment.
Studsvik's services are also in demand in the private nuclear power industry, the defence sector and other industry. In the private nuclear industry and other industry Studsvik processes waste for British Energy and General Electric. In the defence sector Studsvik works with both the AWE (Atomic Weapons Establishment) and private sector customers, such as Babcock.
Comments on the year
2008 was the third full financial year for the United Kingdom and, despite sales growth of 15 per cent, it was a year of consolidation. Two projects in Sellafield were delayed, which caused Studsvik to break off one and renegotiate the other, which reduced profits. These problems arose after Studsvik had established itself within only a few years as the leading player in decommissioning and waste treatment in a rapidly growing market. The problems in both projects can be seen as teething troubles in a new market. Studsvik is now focusing on again supplying high quality services and developing the organization for this new role. During the year Studsvik was awarded several contracts in the defence sector.
In 2008 Nuclear Waste Management (NWM) was engaged by the NDA to operate the UK low level nuclear waste repository. NWM is a consortium between Studsvik, with a 15 per cent stake, the American company URS and the French company AREVA. The order value for the first five years is GBP 125 million, with options to extend worth up to GBP 500 million.
Under the contract, NWM is developing a national UK strategy for management of low level waste from nuclear power plants. The strategy paves the way for large-scale processing of low level waste from the NDA's planned decommissioning of redundant facilities. The low level metallic waste in the UK is estimated to be 500,000 tonnes, 80 per cent or more of which Studsvik calculates can be recycled. Studsvik has the technology for reducing waste volumes and stabilizing the final waste.
In May 2008 Studsvik started the construction of a Metals Recycling Facility (MRF) near Workington and Sellafield in West Cumbria. The facility will be the first of its kind in the UK and the first privately funded waste facility. It will process low level metallic waste from operations and decommissioning of British nuclear power plants. The facility will serve the nuclear power plants that the NDA is decommissioning and other civil and defence customers. Following treatment, a large proportion of the metals can be free released and then sold for recycling. Radioactive residual products are packed and stored safely at the UK low level nuclear waste repository near Drigg in Cumbria.
The Studsvik facility will have the capacity to recycle large volumes of metal scrap, ensuring that the amount of low level waste is minimized before it is sent for final disposal. This is in line with the British low level nuclear waste strategy and the waste hierarchy for storage and final disposal of radioactive waste. The facility is expected to become operational in mid-2009. The investment cost is about GBP 5 million.
| Key ratios | 2008 | 2007 |
|---|---|---|
| Net sales, SEK million | 148.6 | 129.1 |
| Operating profit, SEK million | –3.2 | 3.0 |
| Operating margin, % | neg | 2.3 |
| Investments, SEK million | 38.3 | 42.4 |
| Average number of employees | 86 | 65 |
See page 15 for a description of key offerings
7 6
In 2008 shipment was started of British low level waste to the Swedish facility for treatment. This solution has been received well by both public authorities and customers.
A growing market
The UK market is expected to continue its positive trend. UK nuclear expenditure is estimated to be GBP 4.5 billion annually, of which the NDA's budget is GBP 2.8 billion. The UK was one of the first countries to use nuclear power and consequently has both facilities and waste from the pioneering days to deal with. The NDA's decommissioning commitments were valued at GBP 76 billion when the Authority was established in 2004. Apart from substantial commitments to decommission redundant nuclear power facilities and manage the waste, there are also plans to build new nuclear power plants.
The British government wants to expand the country's nuclear power with ten new reactors to be ordered in the next 4–5 years and operational between 2015 and 2017. Planning is already underway and several energy companies have expressed an interest in taking an active part in the program. Furthest along is British Energy that has chosen sites for two reactors.
The waste treatment market offers substantial business potential. As a consultant to NDA, NWM is devising a strategy that includes treating low level radioactive waste to minimize the volumes that need to be sent for final disposal. This is in line with the priority given by the Authority to maintain the highest standards of safety, health and environmental protection. With Studsvik's Workington facility working in tandem with the Swedish facility, Studsvik is ideally positioned to benefit if the NDA adopts such a strategy. Both public authorities and companies in the nuclear industry have shown great interest in the Workington facility.
In the UK there is also interest in Studsvik's proprietary THOR technology. The technology could be used when decommissioning facilities and treating waste from the early days of nuclear power in the UK. However, this potential is still considerably unexplored and is thought to lie further in the future.
The challenge for Studsvik is to compete in a rapidly growing market, restore a healthy orderbook after completing a major project, while building up capacity to handle rapid growth. Measures have been taken to ensure the supply of staff and competence.
With the Workington facility becoming operational in 2009, a broader customer base and a growing market increasingly attuned to waste treatment, Studsvik is well positioned to continue growing in the UK in the coming years.
Germany
Studsvik's activities in Continental Europe are based in Germany and focus on decommissioning and engineering and services. A small office was opened in France, the second largest nuclear power market in the world.
Ulf Kannengiesser, head of segment Germany
Business overview
Germany accounts for Studsvik's operations in Continental Europe, half of which concern decommissioning. The work is mainly carried out on site with a growing element of consulting services. Studsvik's only facility in Germany is a workshop where many methods and systems have been developed, including Studsvik's system for mechanical decontamination of building surfaces. About half of the Group's workforce is in Germany.
All nuclear power plants in Germany are customers of Studsvik. Studsvik also offers services to research facilities, universities and fuel producers. Customers in Germany, Belgium, France, the Netherlands and Switzerland are served using Germany as a base.
The German government has agreed with the nuclear power industry to close all nuclear power reactors and it is planned to take the last reactor out of service in 2021. A number of reactors have already been shut down and initial dismantling has begun. With the exception of France and Belgium, there are no major decommissioning projects in other Central European countries.
Waste from Europe is processed in the Swedish waste facility, after which stable, volume-reduced residual waste is returned to the customer. This service is handled by and reported in segment Sweden.
Comments on the year
After acquiring Ingenieurbüro Dr. Fary and Ingenieurbüro Ralf Kienzle in 2007, the German operations continued to grow organically in the consulting area. Today Studsvik employs 50 engineers in Germany, which is a significant increase from 2006 when there were 35.
Studsvik is playing an activie part in decommissioning the research center in Karlsruhe. Other parts of the German decommissioning market were characterized by delays, which also affected Studsvik. Some improvement could be noted towards the end of the year when the Obrigheim power plant, after more than a year's delay, received permission to start dismantling the turbine hall there. Studsvik is to dismantle the components in the turbine hall, a contract worth EUR 2.7 million.
The services carried out in connection with nuclear power plants' annual refuelling and maintenance outages vary from year to year. The number of refuelling and maintenance days was slightly lower in 2008 than in 2007. Studsvik's market position continued to be strong and capacity utilization could be kept relatively steady, which had a positive effect on profitability.
The assessment is that the German decommissioning market has long-term potential. Customers are expected to have different approaches to decommissioning. Some will put out large complex assignments to contract, while others are expected to procure smaller contracts. Studsvik holds a good competitive position both as an independent suplier and as a specialist partner.
In 2008 a subsidiary was opened in France, located in Sens, 150 kilometers south of Paris. At year-end it had ten employees. France is clearly the largest nuclear power market in Europe, with 58 reactors, followed by Russia with 31 reactors and the UK with 19. With a local office, the aim is to successively build up a position in the market for more advanced engineering services.
In recent years Studsvik has strengthened its position among operating nuclear power plants, thanks to its specialized engineering and consulting services. These represent a growth area with higher margins than normal maintenance contracts.
See page 15 for a description of key offerings
| Key ratios | 2008 | 2007 |
|---|---|---|
| Net sales, SEK million | 387.9 | 341.3 |
| Operating profit, SEK million | 23.3 | 25.3 |
| Operating margin, % | 6.0 | 7.4 |
| Investments, SEK million | 7.8 | 17.6 |
| Average number of employees | 594 | 564 |
Work at a lead cell in Germany.
USA
At the end of 2008 Studsvik launched a new business model for B/C-level waste in the USA. This is the first and to date the only long-term storage alternative for this type of waste that has been introduced since the closure of the Barnwell repository in mid-2008.
Lewis Johnson, head of segment USA
Business overview
In North America Studsvik markets its services primarily to the US commercial nuclear industry. It also has customers in research, state and other institutions in the USA, and nuclear power producers in Canada. Studsvik owns and runs facilities in Memphis and Erwin in the State of Tennessee. Three of Studsvik's key offerings dominate sales; processing of radioactive waste, on-site waste services and transport and logistics.
Wet A- and B/C-level waste from operating nuclear power plants is treated at Erwin using Studsvik's patented pyrolysis technology THORSM. Other organic waste and metallic waste is treated in Memphis. The logistics operations have a fleet of 20 vehicles, with the capacity and competence to transport radioactive material.
Facilities for treating waste using Studsvik's THOR technology are marketed to the US federal market by THOR Treatment Technologies (TTT). Ownership of the company is divided equally between Studsvik and URS Washington Division.
Comments on the year
Studsvik launched a new model for treatment and storage of B/C-level waste in which Studsvik takes overall responsibility for customers' waste. The waste is treated as before at the Erwin facility, but Studsvik also takes charge of storage and final disposal. Studsvik has signed a contract with Waste Control Specialists (WCS) in Texas for storage of processed and volume-reduced waste.
Residual products used to be sent to a facility in Barnwell, South Carolina, for final disposal. As of July 2008 the Barnwell facility only accepts waste from three of the USA's 50 states, leaving most of the American nuclear power industry without access to final disposal of B/C-level waste. Studsvik's new model has therefore met with great interest from nuclear power plants. Capacity utilization at the Erwin facility was high in the first two quarters before Barnwell closed. The subsequent lack of storage and disposal facilities inhibited demand and the facility was taken out of operation temporarily during the second half of the year. The first contracts under the new waste model were signed at the end of 2008.
Falling waste volumes and stiff competition led to a decision to restructure the Memphis-based operations. Measures were implemented to enhance efficiency in the treatment processes. The measures have resulted in higher efficiency and the amount of waste that can be free released directly has increased considerably. The operations are again profitable. Competition on the transport side was tough, with downward price pressure and high fuel costs. Studsvik reduced the number of transport vehicles from 60 to 20. The operations continued to report losses and further measures were taken towards the end of the year to improve efficiency.
THOR Treatment Technologies (TTT) developed according to plan and reported a profit and a positive cash flow.
See page 15 for a description of key offerings
| Key ratios | 2008 | 2007 |
|---|---|---|
| Net sales, SEK million | 317.1 | 427.7 |
| Operating profit, SEK million | –22.4 | 6.3 |
| Operating margin, % | neg | 1.5 |
| Investments, SEK million | 26.4 | 21.4 |
| Average number of employees | 156 | 234 |
Studsvik also performs on-site services.
Global Services
Studsvik is one of the world's foremost independent suppliers of tests, examinations and analyses of nuclear fuel and material and the only independent supplier of fuel optimization software. The services and products are collected into the Global Services segment, with customers among nuclear power plants and fuel manufacturers in a large number of countries.
Magnus Arbell, President, Studsvik Nuclear AB
Thomas Smed, President, Studsvik Scandpower
Business overview
Global Services comprises operating efficiency services, i.e. materials technology and software for reactor operation. Revenues are relatively evenly distributed between the operational areas. The segment offers services in the following areas: fuel and materials performance, materials integrity and water chemistry, nuclear fuel analysis software, transport logistics and engineering and consultancy.
Studsvik is a world-leading supplier of fuel optimization software through core monitoring and nuclear fuel analysis. Operating efficiency and fuel optimization are becoming increasingly business critical for the nuclear power industry and in practice Studsvik is the only independent player in the world market. Studsvik's software is used by about half of the world's nuclear power plants as well as by fuel manufacturers. In the USA Studsvik's software is used by 80 per cent of the reactors, while the corresponding figure for Japan and Europe excluding France is 50 per cent. Other software on the market is supplied by the fuel manufacturers themselves.
Studsvik is also one of the world's foremost independent suppliers of tests, examinations and analyses of nuclear fuel and material. These are carried out at Studsvik's laboratories in Sweden and, in collaboration with the Institute for Energy Technology (IFE), at the research reactor in Halden, Norway. Customers are fuel suppliers, nuclear power plants, reactor manufacturers, public agencies and research institutions from all over the world.
Technical examinations and analyses are carried out in connection with the development of new types of fuel to meet rigorous standards of effectiveness and safety. Spent nuclear fuel is analyzed to continuously increase the level of knowledge of how fuel and its cladding is affected over time. Most assignments in this segment deal with highly complex issues and often develop in dialog with the customer. Studsvik and the customer work together on an idea that then forms the basis of Studsvik's proposal. This establishes a trusting, long-term and stimulating partnership that results in innovative and customized solutions.
Comments on the year
New sales of fuel optimization software were lower in 2008 than in the previous year, which meant that fullyear earnings were lower than last year. Variation between years is normal for the business and tender activity in the software area is very high. After the reporting period an order was signed with a Japanese customer for delivery of Studsvik's Gardel core monitoring system for a contract value of about SEK 7 million.
Studsvik strengthened its market position with new applications and software versions and a new version of the in-core analysis software CASMO was introduced during the year. MARLA, a newly developed program for managing movement of fuel, control rods and detectors during maintenance outages, was launched during the year and several power companies showed great interest in it.
The strategy of broadening the use of Studsvik's software among American power companies resulted in contracts for Studsvik's core monitoring software CMSOps and the potential for further expansion is good. Relations and cooperation with important customers were enhanced during the year. Studsvik also addressed customers in new markets in Asia.
Performance for materials technology improved in 2008. Contracts were signed with new customers in the UK and Japanese markets. The orderbooks were healthy and tendering activities high.
There were extensive preparations for receiving and testing irradiated fuel from the UK within the framework of the multi-year contract signed with British Energy. The first deliveries under the contract were delayed, however, due to the amended requirements imposed by the public authorities' processing of the shipment. The material will be delivered in April 2009 and the framework agreement is expected to lead to sizeable contracts in coming years.
Demand from the international nuclear power industry for consulting services is growing. In October 2008 Studsvik acquired the nuclear technology consuting company ALARA Holding, with customers in the Swedish and Finnish nuclear power industry. The acquisition implies a broadening of Studsvik's range of specialist services.
| Key ratios | 2008 | 2007 |
|---|---|---|
| Net sales, SEK million | 196.0 | 178.8 |
| Operating profit, SEK million | 13.0 | 14.4 |
| Operating margin, % | 6.6 | 8.1 |
| Investments, SEK million | 14.4 | 5.3 |
| Average number of employees | 129 | 118 |
See page 15 for a description of key offerings.
Transporting nuclear fuel is complicated and involves rigorous regulatory requirements. Studsvik has decided to invest in its own transport flask, which will facilitate both regulatory licensing and physical transport. Certification of the transport flask in advance in different countries will reduce the authorities' processing times for individual
shipments. Having access to our own transport flask will eliminate or at any rate considerably reduce the delays that often arise today. The transport flask will be delivered in the first half of 2010.
The picture shows the type of transport flask that will be delivered to Studsvik in early 2010. The transport flask weighs about 45 tonnes.
Studsvik's corporate responsibility activities
Studsvik conducts systematic corporate responsibility activities to ensure good working conditions inside and outside the Group. With the help of a stakeholder dialog the perspective of this work moved one step further in 2008.
Eva Halldén, Senior Vice President, Group Assurance and HR
Studsvik is taking a new approach to the field of corporate responsibility
For many years Studsvik has reported the Group's environmental impact in the annual report and in separate publications. In 2007 the first step towards a wider approach to what is now called corporate responsibility accounting was taken when a Groupwide Corporate Sustainability Report was published. In 2008 the work progressed yet another step and Studsvik is publishing a Corporate Responsibility Report which takes an integrated approach to the Group based on corporate responsibility, environment, safety and work environment. Studsvik uses the term Corporate Responsibility to mark clearly the significance of the responsibility the company has towards its stakeholders and the industry in which it operates. For Studsvik, Corporate Responsibility entails a commitment to follow the principles of sustainable development that also includes the environment, health and safety as well as ethical and social aspects.
Studsvik's Code of Conduct is the cornerstone of our corporate responsibility activities. The Code of Conduct presents and examines the core values that form the foundation of corporate responsibility activities, how Studsvik's employees are to behave towards each other and Studsvik's responsibility as a player in the nuclear power industry. The Code of Conduct also describes Studsvik's responsibility towards its stakeholders and how the Group expects its business partners to behave.
The Global Reporting Initiative and Corporate Responsibility Report
Transparency and accounting for corporate responsibility activities are crucial to establishing the credibility expected of a company that delivers highly specialised services to the international nuclear power industry. Studsvik's Corporate Responsibility Report has been prepared in accordance with the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and covers the following four areas:
- Employees and organization
- Society
- Customers and suppliers
- Environment
The Group's objectives, performance, results and future plans in these four areas are presented and commented on in the Corporate Responsibility Report. To establish transparency, facilitate benchmarking and improve communication with the company's stakeholders, Studsvik's Corporate Responsibility Report 2008 follows level B in the Global Reporting Initiative's guidelines.
In 2008 Studsvik conducted a stakeholder dialog to determine what different stakeholders want to know about Studsvik and the Group's activities. An external consultancy carried out 30 telephone interviews with stakeholders in the countries where Studsvik operates.
The conclusion from the interviews was that stakeholders wanted to follow Studsvik's work in the areas described in the table.
| Studsvik's strategic areas of Corporate Responsibility |
Topics prioritized by interviewed stakeholders |
|---|---|
| Employees and organization |
ƒ A safe and healthy working environment ƒ Managers create the right conditions for openness and cooperation ƒ Compliance with legislative and regula tory requirements |
| Society | ƒ Compliance with legislative and regula tory requirements |
| Customers and suppliers |
ƒ Basic human rights respected by Studsvik's suppliers, such as ensuring that there is no child labor, no forced labor and ensuring compliance with occupational health and safety standards ƒ Compliance with legislative and regula tory requirements |
| Environment | ƒ Minimizing the impact on the environ ment with respect to emissions and radioactive releases ƒ Minimizing impact on the environment with respect to waste generated by Studsvik's own operations ƒ Compliance with legislative and regula tory requirements |
Studsvik's Code of Conduct launched in 2008
Studsvik is an international Group that continues to expand its operations globally. Studsvik's Code of Conduct was launched to meet a growing need for common guidelines for corporate responsibility and ethical conduct for Studsvik and its business partners.
As a minimum Studsvik of course complies with all applicable laws and regulatory requirements in the countries where it operates. In areas not covered by existing legislation or regulatory frameworks Studsvik has adopted or will adopt guidelines that are in line with the Group's values.
The Code of Conduct is a living document that contains guidelines on issues such as health and safety, environmental impact, human rights, corruption and ethics, insider trading, employer relations, social relations, IT security and whistle-blowing.
The Code of Conduct was introduced into the organization in summer 2008 and employees were informed and given the opportunity to discuss issues with their managers. The Code is available to all employees via Studsvik's intranet and is included in the introduction program for new employees.
The Code is available in four languages; English, French, German and Swedish, and can also be downloaded from Studsvik's website.
Safety, environment and work environment
All Studsvik's operations must, where applicable, follow up and measure radioactive releases. Studsvik has a legal and moral obligation to ensure that all such emissions are minimized. Studsvik's facilities and operations have been designed to fulfil this obligation. Radiation to the environment can be measured both in the form of annual doses at the facilities' fence perimeters and in the form of radioactive releases to air and water. Studsvik's facility in Sweden gives rise to radioactive releases to air and water. At the facilities in Memphis and Erwin in the USA there are only emissions to air. The annual dose at the fence perimeter and in the releases to air and water are far below the applicable limit values.
Radiation doses to personnel at Studsvik's nuclear facilities have not exceeded applicable limit values. The collective radiation dose increased in Sweden in 2008, mainly as a consequence of more people being engaged in radiological work with low individual doses. Radiation doses at the American facilities are higher than at the
Swedish facilities due to differences in working methods and type of waste treated. The collective dose at the Erwin and Memphis facilities was halved in 2008 compared with 2007, as a result of improved radiation shielding and improved instructions and procedures. The decrease is also explained by lower production than in the previous year and by the lower radioactivity of waste treated. Studsvik has no facilities of its own in Germany or the United Kingdom, but since Studsvik's staff work in radiologically classified areas at customer sites, the doses to personnel are also monitored there.
In 2008 the number of work-related accidents in the Group decreased by almost half, from 40 in 2007 to 22. The decrease is mainly related to Germany and the result of extensive efforts to train the staff and improve routines and procedures.
1 Radiation doses to personnel, collective/max individual (mSv)
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| 202/8.3 | 158/14.2 | 164/7.2 |
| 786/26.4 | 1,578/31.3 | 1,858/34.8 |
| 413/30.0 | 1,230/34.0 | 866/35.5 |
| 952/17.3 | 875/13.5 | 596/12.8 |
| 35.5/3.4 | 4.6/0.8 | 5.5/1.7 |
2 Radiation doses to the environment, max at fence perimeter (mSv)
| 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|
| 0.2 | 0.2 |
| 0.7 | 0.9 |
| 3.7 | 2.1 |
3 Emissions to air and water (% of permitted emission)
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 0.28 | 0.21 | 0.18 |
| Erwin, USA | 0.05 | 0.14 | 0.003 |
| Memphis, USA | 0 | 4 | 0.4 |
4 Work-related accidents leading to sickness leave
| 2008 | 2007 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Number, Group total | 22 | 40 |
Objectives and plans for corporate responsibility activities
Studsvik's overall objectives for the Group's corporate responsibility activities, the specific action plans adopted for the period 2008–2011, the trend in 2008 and direction for 2009 are presented below.
"We've worked a lot on developing and refining our sales and business skills, but this alone is not enough. The Code of Conduct is an important tool in enhancing our business ethics. As managers, it's important to have a good understanding of ethical behavior so that we can be a role model for others in the organization."
Camilla Hoflund, General Manager, Materials Technology, Studsvik Nuclear AB
| EMPLOYEES AND ORGANIZATION | SOCIETY | |
|---|---|---|
| OVERALL GOALS | Studsvik aims to offer its employees a safe and healthy workplace and a good balance between work and leisure. The role of managers is to ensure that every indi vidual's knowledge and competence are utilized to the full and also to create sound conditions for cooperation and the exchange of expertise. |
Studsvik aims to maintain good and open communi cation with its stakeholders. Studsvik aims to promote a culture of responsibility where honesty, integrity and fairness in its relations with stakeholders are important elements. Studsvik strives to hire local employees as far as possible in its operations and to thereby make a positive economic contribution to society. |
| ACTION PLAN 2008–2011 |
ƒ Occupational health and safety is to be improved systematically ƒ Best practice is to be applied and training conducted to minimize radiation doses to employees ƒ Continuous competence development is to be carried out, including the training of managers and employees ƒ Appraisal interviews are to be conducted with all employees ƒ Job rotation is to be encouraged among the different Studsvik companies ƒ Regular and structured feedback is to be obtained from employees to improve human resource development work ƒ Employee recruitment and retention measures are to be implemented |
ƒ As far as possible, recruitment is to be conducted locally in communities where Studsvik has its operations ƒ Initiatives are to be carried out with educational establishments to encourage the younger generation to become interested in science and technology ƒ Good relations are to be maintained with regulatory authorities, financial stakeholders and the media ƒ Consultation with local communities and other relevant stakeholders is to be carried out ƒ Sponsorship of selected local events and causes is to be conducted ƒ Job vacancies are to be advertised on Studsvik's intranet and on the Internet |
| ACHIEVEMENTS IN 2008 |
ƒ A common model for following up work-related accidents and incidents was established for the Group ƒ Safety awareness training was conducted in Germany which led to a reduction in the number of occupa tional injuries ƒ A Human Resources team was appointed to develop an action plan to create and implement common tools for the development of Studsvik's employees ƒ Appraisal interviews were held throughout the Group during the year ƒ Job rotation was carried out between employees in the UK and Germany during the year ƒ Investors in People accreditation was achieved in the UK ƒ Environmental and occupational exposures were reduced in the US operations through shielding and material handling improvements |
ƒ The corporate website was updated in order to improve communication through this channel ƒ Stakeholder dialog for the Corporate Responsibility Report 2008 and other purposes, was conducted with key stakeholder categories ƒ A Code of Conduct was launched and introduced to all employees ƒ Sponsorship of local events and causes was conducted in the UK, Sweden, Germany and the USA ƒ Educational initiatives were carried out with local schools in Sweden and in the UK ƒ Contact was maintained with financial stakeholders ƒ Contact was maintained with regulatory authorities in Sweden, the UK and the USA ƒ Contact was maintained with local stakeholder groups in Sweden, the UK and the USA |
| FOCUS FOR 2009 | Studsvik will continue to focus on improving its safety culture, on quality assurance and on implementing the employee development actions, including training, job rotation, new recruitment and employee retention, as identified by the Human Resources Team. |
Studsvik will continue to cultivate an open commu nication with all stakeholders. Studsvik will continue to develop and monitor compliance with its Code of Conduct. Studsvik will also contribute to local economies and communities by providing local employment opportunities, through participation in local job fairs, and through cooperation with local universities. |
| CUSTOMERS AND SUPPLIERS | ENVIRONMENT | |
|---|---|---|
| OVERALL GOALS | Studsvik aims to meet its customers' demands and deliver services and solutions with a high value added. Studsvik's services are designed to minimize risk for its customers and the environment. Studsvik's services are characterized by innovation, efficiency, safety and reliability. |
Studsvik aims to minimize the environmental impact of its operations, with respect to radioactive releases and other emissions, waste generated and resource usage. Studsvik's business is to provide sustainable solutions for the safe and environmentally responsible operation and decommissioning of nuclear facilities, including waste minimization. |
| ACTION PLAN 2008–2011 |
ƒ Service offerings are to be broadened to meet customer demands ƒ Operations are to be established in new markets where there is a demand for Studsvik's services ƒ Continuous efficiency improvement is to be achieved |
ƒ Best available technique is to be used to minimize emissions and radioactive releases from Studsvik's nuclear sites to air and water ƒ Available methods are to be used and new methods developed to minimize waste from Studsvik's own operations ƒ The use of resources is to be minimized. This work is to be followed up and corrective actions taken when necessary ƒ Natural habitats located next to Studsvik's operations are to be protected and/or restored as far as possible ƒ Training in environmental awareness is to be provided |
| ACHIEVEMENTS IN 2008 |
ƒ Development and licensing work was conducted for a new business model for the treatment of intermedi ate level waste in the USA ƒ A license for a new nuclear facility for metallic waste treatment was obtained in the UK ƒ New services for the treatment of metallic waste were launched in Sweden ƒ Stainless steel components for nuclear facilities were manufactured in Studsvik's workshop in Germany ƒ New in-core fuel management software versions were launched within the Global Services segment ƒ A new Studsvik office was established in France ƒ Studsvik was established as a supplier of materials technology services on the UK market |
ƒ A new chemical handling management system was introduced in the operations in Sweden ƒ An internal waste management system was further developed in the operations in Sweden ƒ A project to measure the individual carbon footprint of each employee in the UK was implemented ƒ Fuel consumption was reduced by increased use of cars with low/environmental friendly consumption in Germany ƒ Studsvik continued to take and analyze samples of flora and fauna in the areas surrounding the site in Sweden ƒ As required by law, an Environmental Impact Assessment was conducted for a new pyrolysis unit in the incineration facility in Sweden ƒ Basic environmental awareness training was implemented for all employees in the UK |
| FOCUS FOR 2009 | Studsvik will focus on growing its engineering and consultancy business, on gradually establishing its presence in France and on increasing its presence in Canada, Finland and Spain. The UK facility for metallic waste treatment will be taken into operation and the new business model for waste treatment will be implemented in the USA. Studsvik will continue to improve the logistics efficiency in its metallic waste treatment facility in Sweden and will develop its sustainable procurement requirements and procedures. |
Studsvik will continue to work on minimizing its envi ronmental impact and on cooperating with local or ganizations to protect the habitats in areas where its operations are located. |
Risks
Studsvik operates on an international market that is exposed to competition. With operations in eight countries Studsvik is exposed to both operational and financial risks. The responsibility for risk assessment lies mainly within each subsidiary, but is reviewed and followed up by the parent company. An overall analysis of the Group's risks and how they are dealt with is presented annually to the Board of Directors and is followed up on a regular basis. The Group has a high safety culture, which rests on a long tradition of clear routines for quality assurance and followup in the context of various quality certification processes. The fact that Studsvik operates in the nuclear sector entails special risks that are regulated and supervised by national agencies and international bodies.
An overall risk assessment must include all parts of the annual report and a general business environment analysis. Selected risk factors are described below in no order of rank.
Financial risks are dealt with in the section "Financial risk management", note 2 on page 58.
EXTERNAL RISKS Licensing and permits
Studsvik handles radioactive material and waste, which means that some of the operations must be licensed and are subject to official approval and supervision. Consequently there is a risk that the conditions governing operations may be changed through amendment or cancellation of official permits, changes in the regulatory framework or through political decisions. This may for example involve further protective measures that Studsvik may need to invest in to fulfil requirements. Studsvik may be notified by regulators of alleged infringements of licensing or regulations. As far as the management and Board of Directors can judge, Studsvik fulfils the requirements imposed by such regulations. The Group's high safety culture means that it has a high capacity for adjustment to new rules and terms of reference.
Market
Demand for Studsvik's services depends on a number of factors, and in the long term is dependent on developments in the nuclear power industry and the factors influencing them. By tailoring its services to the nuclear power industry's needs throughout plant lifecycles, Studsvik's business is only dependent in the very long term on the survival of the nuclear power industry.
Public opinion
Issues relating to nuclear technology are of public interest. Various issues may be subject to various expressions of opinion and debate. In such a context it cannot be ruled out that opinion may emerge on matters that directly or indirectly restrict Studsvik's scope of business action. Studsvik acts consistently to maintain high public confidence by doing what it can not to conduct its business in conflict with public opinion. Its approach to the world around is characterized by dialog and the principle of the greatest possible transparency.
OPERATIONAL RISKS Technology
Software, laboratory activities, waste treatment and certain specialist services provided through Studsvik's operations are based on proprietary technology that is constantly exposed to competitive challenges. The possibility of other methods being developed that reduce the competitiveness of Studsvik's technologies cannot be ruled out. Studsvik manages this risk by patenting its proprietary technology whenever it is considered possible and financially justifiable. The risk is also managed through continuous product development in close cooperation with customers, as well as through offering customers to a great extent one-stop solutions, based on Studsvik's extensive experience, which makes Studsvik less sensitive to the replication of individual services or products.
Transportation
A large part of Studsvik's operations, especially in the field of materials testing and waste management, involves the transportation of material to and from Studsvik's facilities, which could be hindered by new legislation or amendments to international conventions. Transportation already complies with high safety standards, is subject to frequent inspections by supervisory authorities and has a low risk of harmful consequences in the event of an accident.
Operation of company facilities
Studsvik conducts its business at its own facilities. Technical failures that cause unplanned operational disruptions cannot be ruled out, and may have an adverse effect on income and give rise to costs. Studsvik's quality and monitoring systems, as well as its competence development processes, are intended to minimize the risk of unplanned operational disruptions, and improve contingency planning to minimize the effects of any disruptions that do nevertheless occur.
Dependence on employees
The running of Studsvik's facilities depends on the workforce being complete and competent. Studsvik has a long history of industrial peace. However, labor conflicts that
may affect business and cause loss of income cannot be ruled out. Studsvik works actively to create stable and sound relations with employees and trade union organizations. An active human resources policy with the means and systems required for employee development creates a high level of job satisfaction. In accordance with Swedish legislation Studsvik has trade union representatives on the board of the parent company.
Dependence on key personnel
Studsvik offers proprietary technical solutions and services using different types of specialist expertise. This makes the company to some extent dependent on key personnel. This risk is continually limited by systematising processes, recruitment and competence development.
Fixed price contracts
In connection with large decommissioning projects and other service contracts Studsvik sometimes accepts fixed price contracts. These projects require effective risk management and project management. Studsvik trains its project managers and applies special procedures that are integrated into the Group's quality systems (ISO 9001:2000) to ensure that these risks are managed professionally.
Supplier liability
Studsvik supplies services with a high technical content to qualified customers. As a supplier, Studsvik is responsible for timely delivery, functionality and other qualities of services ordered. If a service is delivered late or does not fulfil requirements that a customer can rightfully impose, Studsvik risks loss of income, for example as a consequence of costs incurred for redress through replacement or damages. Studsvik makes regular assessments of potential exposures and makes provisions in the balance sheet.
Owner liability for intermediate level waste
In the USA Studsvik takes over owner liability for certain intermediate level waste from its customers. The Group has agreed with the subcontractor on storage of this waste pending the opening of a final repository. Changes in regulatory or commercial conditions that necessitate amendments or supplements to this arrangement cannot be ruled out. The risk is managed by Studsvik making provisions in the balance sheet for future costs of storage and disposal and receiving compensation for the risks associated with long-term commitments. Liquid assets referring to the future commitments are deposited in a blocked account in an American bank.
Dependence on suppliers
An element of Studsvik's strategy is to design unique customer offerings together with selected suppliers, which can result in a measure of natural dependence on these suppliers. The design of Studsvik's contracts enables close relationships based on trust, while keeping alternative suppliers available.
Financing and political decisions
In most countries, nuclear decommissioning and the treatment of radioactive waste require the active involvement of the authorities, for example through decisions on financing, decommissioning permits, and rules regulating final disposal. In many markets these activities are funded through complex systems involving a combination of accumulated funds, income from the operations of nuclear power plants, and taxes. Consequently, political decisions affect demand for Studsvik's services, particularly in the areas of waste management and decommissioning. Delays in processing by the authorities and resulting delay in completion of contracts cannot be ruled out.
INSURABLE RISKS
Accidents
Studsvik conducts operations at its own laboratories and facilities. The possibility of an accident at one of these sites, or in connection with transportation to or from a site, cannot be ruled out. Potential accident risks are regularly surveyed at the subsidiaries. Preventive measures are integrated into the Group's quality and safety systems. In order to reduce the negative impact on profits that an accident and subsequent stoppage could have, consequential loss insurance has been taken out for some strategic facilities.
Theft, sabotage or attack
A company handling radioactive material can never completely exclude the possibility of theft. The transportation of radioactive material, as well as facilities for storage and processing, can be the target of sabotage or other forms of attack. Studsvik takes active measures to maintain physical protection in close cooperation with the police and public authorities.
The level of physical protection is regularly adjusted in line with the assessment of the threat picture made by the police and public authorities. During the period 2006–2008 considerable investments were made in physical protection of the Swedish facilities. Studsvik follows the plans drawn up by the licensing and supervisory authorities.
The Group's insurance policies
The Group has global liability and product liability insurance cover. Liability and property insurance for Swedish nuclear business has been taken out with Nordic Nuclear Insurers (NNI) and with the mutual insurance companies EMANI and ELINI. Insurance covering corresponding risks on the US market has been taken out with a local nuclear insurance pool and with EMANI. The cover for the nuclear business is regulated by the Swedish Nuclear Liability Act and is currently SDR 360 million (SDR=Special Drawing Rights) equivalent to SEK 4.35 billion. However, the possibility that internationally regulated insurance amounts will be increased or that the cost of insurance cover will rise as a result cannot be ruled out. Property insurance for non-nuclear activities is usually arranged locally. The scope and amount of the insurance cover are determined after individual assessment and risk analyses, but insurance is always procured under the supervision of the parent company.
OTHER RISKS
Liability for decommissioning costs
The operations at Studsvik's Swedish nuclear facilities are conducted under license pursuant to the Swedish Act on Nuclear Activities and it is therefore Studsvik's responsibility to decommission the facilities. Under US regulations Studsvik is technically and financially responsible for decommissioning the Group's US facilities. The scope and implications of these obligations and a risk assessment of them are described in more detail in the administration report, page 38.
Environmental debt
Studsvik generates only an extremely limited volume of waste that impacts the environment. In those cases where Studsvik manages radioactive waste on behalf of a customer, the liability for the residual radioactive products lies with the customer, except at the Erwin facility, where Studsvik takes over ownership of the waste. Studsvik has contracted with Waste Control Specialists on storage of that waste and also intends to contract with the same company on final disposal.
Sensitivity analysis
Variations in prices to customers and the Group's costs affect the Group's earnings. The Group's largest single cost item is personnel, which accounts for 50 per cent of total costs. The Group's largest currency exposures are in USD, EUR and GBP.
| Impact on operating profit | Change | SEK million | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price to customer | 1 per cent | +/- | 12.9 |
| Personnel costs | 1 per cent | +/- | 6.4 |
| Exchange rate | 10 per cent | +/- | 1.9 |
| USD/EUR/GBP |
The share
Share price and trading
The Studsvik share is listed on NASDAQ OMX Stockholm. The price of the Studsvik share fell by 65 per cent during the year, from SEK 155 at the end of 2007 to SEK 55 at the end of 2008, equivalent to a closing market capitalization of SEK 452.0 million. During the year the share price varied between a high of SEK 170 on January 3 and a low of SEK 47 on November 21. In the same period the Carnegie Small Cap Index fell by 54 per cent.
Earnings per share before dilution amounted to SEK –0.05 (5.65).
In 2008, 2.96 million Studsvik shares were traded for a value of SEK 281.2 million. This corresponds to 56 per cent of the free float (the value of shares that are available for trading). The market capitalization of the free float was SEK 291.2 million at the end of the year, defined as the value of the shares held by shareholders with less than 10 per cent of the capital.
Number of shares and share capital
On December 31, 2008 Studsvik AB (publ) had 8,218,611 shares in issue. Each share carries one vote and entitles the owner to share equally in the company's assets and earnings. The quotient value is 1.0 and the share capital amounted to SEK 8.2 million.
Shareholders
On December 31 Studsvik had 3,928 shareholders. The percentage of shares registered abroad was 35.6 per cent. The two largest owners held 36.3 per cent of the shares and the ten largest owners 68.6 per cent. At year-end Studsvik's Board of Directors owned 2,602,954 shares, corresponding to 31.7 per cent of capital and votes. The Executive Group Management, consisting of nine persons, together owned 31,300 shares, corresponding to 0.4 per cent of the shares.
Dividend policy and dividend
The Board's goal is that on average the dividend should correspond to at least 30 per cent of the consolidated profit after tax. Decisions on dividend proposals will, however, depend on Studsvik's growth potential, the strength of its balance sheet, liquid funds and financial position in general.
The Board proposes that the Annual General Meeting approve a dividend of SEK 1.00 per share for the 2008 financial year.
DATA PER SHARE
| Amount, SEK | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of shares at close of period | 8,218,611 | 8,218,611 | 8,218,611 | 8,218,611 | 8,116,611 |
| Average number of shares before dilution | 8,218,611 | 8,218,611 | 8,218,611 | 8,167,611 | 8,115,411 |
| Average number of shares after dilution | 8,218,611 | 8,218,611 | 8,218,611 | 8,167,611 | 8,217,411 |
| Price, December 31 | 55.00 | 155.00 | 253.00 | 204.00 | 92.50 |
| Earnings per share before dilution | –0.05 | 5.65 | 4.24 | 7.48 | –8.19 |
| – of which from continuing operations | –0.05 | 5.65 | 4.24 | 5.81 | 2.99 |
| Earnings per share after dilution | –0.05 | 5.65 | 4.24 | 7.48 | –8.09 |
| – of which from continuing operations | –0.05 | 5.65 | 4.24 | 5.81 | 2.95 |
| Equity per share | 74.32 | 69.58 | 67.97 | 68.90 | 54.60 |
| P/E ratio | neg | 27 | 60 | 27 | neg |
| SHAREHOLDER STRUCTURE DECEMBER 31, 2008 | Number of shareholders | Number of shares | % of total shares |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 – 500 | 3,490 | 318,082 | 3.9 |
| 501 –2,000 | 284 | 299,197 | 3.6 |
| 2,001 – 10,000 | 98 | 456,007 | 5.6 |
| 10,001 – 50,000 | 32 | 711,956 | 8.7 |
| 50,001 –100,000 | 5 | 369,328 | 4.4 |
| 100,001 – | 19 | 6,064,041 | 73.8 |
| Total | 3,928 | 8,218,611 | 100.0 |
| SHAREHOLDERS DECEMBER 31, 2008 | Number of shares | Holding, % |
|---|---|---|
| Karinen Family | 1,703,552 | 20.7 |
| Briban Invest AB | 1,283,492 | 15.6 |
| Allianz Global Investors | 714,561 | 8.7 |
| Bank of New York, London | 441,413 | 5.4 |
| Goldman Sachs International Ltd | 351,146 | 4.3 |
| Lannebo Fonder | 333,091 | 4.1 |
| State Street Bank, Boston | 267,552 | 3.3 |
| Invus Investment AB | 199,800 | 2.4 |
| JP Morgan Chase Bank, England | 184,450 | 2.2 |
| Citibank NA, London | 154,868 | 1.9 |
| Total, 10 largest shareholders – holdings | 5,633,925 | 68.6 |
| Other shareholders | 2,584,686 | 31.4 |
| Total | 8,218,611 | 100.0 |
CHANGE IN SHARE CAPITAL
| Year | Transaction | Increase in number of shares |
Share capital SEK | Total number of shares |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1994 | Founding | 500,000 | 500,000 | 500,000 |
| 2001 | Bonus issue | 5,300,000 | 5,800,000 | 5,800,000 |
| 2001 | New issue | 2,314,211 | 8,114,211 | 8,114,211 |
| 2004 | New issue 1) | 2,400 | 8,116,611 | 8,116,611 |
| 2005 | New issue 1) | 102,000 | 8,218,611 | 8,218,611 |
| 1) Conversion of warrants. |
Annual accounts
| Administration report | 38 |
|---|---|
| Consolidated income statement | 45 |
| Consolidated balance sheet | 46 |
| Consolidated statement of changes in equity | 47 |
| Consolidated cash flow statement | 48 |
| Parent company income statement | 49 |
| Parent company balance sheet | 50 |
| Parent company statement of changes in equity | 51 |
| Parent company cash flow statement | 52 |
| Notes | 53 |
| Audit report | 77 |
| Five-year review | 86 |
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED ACCOUNTS
| 1 | Accounting policies and valuation principles. | 53 |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Financial risk management | 58 |
| 3 | Important accounting estimates. | 59 |
| 4 | Segment reporting. | 60 |
| 5 | Other gains and losses – net | 61 |
| 6 | Other income | 61 |
| 7 | Costs by nature of expense | 61 |
| 8 | Remuneration of auditors | 61 |
| 9 | Employee benefits | 62 |
| 10 | Financial income and expenses. | 63 |
| 11 | Income tax. | 63 |
| 12 | Foreign exchange differences – net | 63 |
| 13 | Earnings per share | 63 |
| 14 | Dividend per share | 63 |
| 15 | Property, plant and equipment | 64 |
| 16 | Intangible assets | 65 |
| 17 | Investments in associated companies | 65 |
| 18 | Financial instruments by category | 66 |
| 19 | Credit quality of the financial assets | 66 |
| 20 | Derivative financial instruments. | 67 |
| 21 | Trade and other receivables | 67 |
| 22 | Inventories. | 67 |
| 23 | Cash and cash equivalents | 67 |
| 24 | Share capital and other contributed capital | 67 |
| 25 | Retained earnings | 68 |
| 26 | Other reserves. | 68 |
| 27 | Trade and other payables | 68 |
| 28 | Borrowings. | 68 |
| 29 | Deferred tax | 69 |
| 30 | Pension obligations. | 70 |
| 31 | Other provisions | 70 |
| 32 | Cash flow from operating activities | 70 |
| 33 | Contingent liabilities | 71 |
| 34 | Commitments. | 71 |
| 35 | Business combinations. | 71 |
| 36 | Information on the Board of Directors and senior management. | 72 |
| 37 | Transactions with related parties | 73 |
NOTES TO THE PARENT COMPANY ACCOUNTS
| 38 | Net sales. | 74 |
|---|---|---|
| 39 | Employee benefits. | 74 |
| 40 | Costs by nature of expense | 74 |
| 41 | Depreciation. | 74 |
| 42 | Operational lease contracts. | 74 |
| 43 | Interest income and similar profit/loss items. | 74 |
| 44 | Interest expense and similar profit/loss items. | 74 |
| 45 | Appropriations. | 74 |
| 46 | Income tax. | 74 |
| 47 | Deferred tax. | 75 |
| 48 | Property, plant and equipment. | 75 |
| 49 | Financial assets. | 75 |
| 50 | Prepaid expenses and accrued income. | 75 |
| 51 | Shares and participations in subsidiaries. | 75 |
| 52 | Untaxed reserves. | 76 |
| 53 | Liabilities to credit institutions. | 76 |
| 54 | Accrued expenses and prepaid income. | 76 |
| 55 | Pledged assets. 76 | |
| 56 | Contingent liabilities. | 76 |
| 57 | Derivative financial instruments. | 76 |
| 58 | Investment in property, plant and equipment. | 76 |
| 59 | Cash flow from operating activities | 76 |
| 60 | Transactions with related parties | 76 |
| 61 | Average number of employees. | 76 |
| 62 | Investment in subsidiaries. | 76 |
Administration report
The Board of Directors and the President of Studsvik AB (publ), corporate identity number 556501-0997, hereby submit the annual accounts for 2008.
BUSINESS ACTIVITIES OF THE GROUP
Studsvik is a leading supplier of services to the international nuclear power industry. Its customers are mainly nuclear power plants and suppliers to the nuclear industry. The Group's largest markets are the USA, Germany, the UK and Sweden. Studsvik's operations are conducted at its own facilities in Sweden and in the USA as well as at customer sites. Studsvik offers specialist services and technical solutions throughout the lifecycle of a nuclear power plant, with an emphasis on the operative and reinvestment phases, as well as the decommissioning phase.
In 2008 the Group conducted its business through five operating segments. The segmental structure is geographical, consisting of the operating segments Sweden, United Kingdom, Germany, USA and Global Services.
The company's share is listed on the NASDAQ OMX Stockholm exchange.
MARKETS
Energy prices in the world are high and demand for electricity is increasing. The use of fossil fuels causes a heavy environmental burden and interest in nuclear-generated electricity has increased. In light of this, existing nuclear power plants are being modernized and new production capacity is being planned and built. A total of 36 reactors are being built throughout the world, while over 80 reactors are being planned. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) predicts that production of nucleargenerated electricity may have doubled by 2030. Older facilities which cannot be modernized for technical or economic reasons are taken out of operation and prepared for dismantling. Extensive government investments are being made in the USA and the UK to deal with waste and to decommission civil and military nuclear facilities. Both countries are investing considerable resources in these programs, which are expected to run for a long period. The nuclear power industry has focused in recent years on taking care of its residual products responsibly. In some countries there is a shortage of space for storage of low and intermediate level waste and storage costs are high. Interest in and demand for environmentally responsible methods for handling industry's residual products is growing. The generation of experts who developed today's reactors is successively leaving the industry, and there is a consequent shortage of certain specialist functions both at electricity producers and reactor and system suppliers.
The market trend is favorable for Studsvik and presents business opportunities for all segments.
STUDSVIK'S BUSINESS AND MARKET POSITION Waste treatment
The generation of electricity at nuclear power plants gives rise to low and intermediate level radioactive waste that has to be dealt with. By processing the material using a variety of methods, Studsvik can recover large quantities of metallic materials, as well as reducing the volume of and stabilizing residual products, thereby lowering customers' waste treatment costs considerably.
Increasing the output of and modernizing a power plant usually entails changing large components such as turbines, heat exchangers and steam generators. Replaced components must be dealt with cost-effectively and environmentally responsibly. Studsvik's facilities and waste treatment methods are designed exactly for this.
When decommissioning nuclear facilities, large amounts of waste of different kinds must be processed before being sent for final disposal. Studsvik has superior methods for treating this material. Organic waste is usually treated using various thermal processes to achieve a chemically stable product suitable for final disposal, but is also melted and sorted to reduce the volume of final waste for disposal. Metallic material is cleaned by several mechanical or chemical methods, usually in combination with melting, to enable recycling of a substantial part of the waste.
Decommissioning
Decommissioning of nuclear facilities has started in several countries. Studsvik has worked with decommissioning in Sweden and Germany for more than 20 years and is well-established in these markets. Just over three years ago Studsvik established operations in the UK, where the Government has initiated an extensive decommissioning program. During the decommissioning phase services in various areas of competence are needed, from qualified calculations and project management to dismantling and demolition.
Engineering and services
High electricity prices combined with increased electricity consumption are resulting in efforts by the nuclear power industry to achieve as high a level of availability as possible. The power industry therefore attaches great importance to improving efficiency and cutting outage times for planned maintenance and service. Studsvik has established a strong position in central Europe with multiyear partnership contracts.
For renewal and upgrading of operating licenses the nuclear power industry needs to implement safety and process analyses and draw up waste plans. Studsvik has many years experience of these matters and is focusing on expansion of these and associated operations through recruitment and acquisition.
Operating efficiency
In both the operating and reinvestment phases there is a demand in the nuclear industry for qualified technical services in order, for example, to establish the strength and expected life of construction materials and fuel. Studsvik has more than 60 years experience of these issues and has competence and laboratory capacity necessary to test and evaluate both irradiated and non-irradiated material. In day-to-day operations the nuclear power industry aims at good fuel economy. An increase in output usually means that the power industry wants to increase burn-up from the reactor fuel, i.e. extract more energy from each fuel element, without jeopardizing the high operating safety level. Studsvik's software for fuel and core optimization and monitoring is market leading.
FULFILMENT OF FINANCIAL OBJECTIVES
Studsvik's long-term targets are organic growth of at least 10 cent per year, an operating margin for the Group of 8 per cent and an equity-assets ratio of at least 40 per cent.
In 2008 there was a radical change in market conditions in the USA, which led to one of Studsvik's production facilities being taken out of operation for most of the second half of the year. This had a strong negative effect on the Group's sales. In other segments organic growth was 6 per cent, measured in local currency. The operating margin was 1 per cent, which is a drastic decrease compared with 2007. This can be mainly attributed to the developments in the US operations, but also to developments in the United Kingdom. The equity-assets ratio in 2008 was 40.4 per cent, compared with 42.5 per cent in 2007.
IMPORTANT EVENTS
Orders for treatment of steam generators
In July Studsvik won a contract for treatment and recycling of three steam generators on behalf of Vattenfall Ringhals. The customer is planning to deliver the steam generators to Studsvik in spring 2009 when treatment will start. The order value was SEK 34 million.
Acquisition of consulting company in Sweden
In October Studsvik acquired ALARA Holding, a nuclear engineering consultancy, with customers in the Swedish and Finnish nuclear power industry.
Order for metallic waste from Oskarshamn
In November Studsvik signed a contract with the Oskarshamn plant to treat 1,400 tonnes of metallic waste for a total of SEK 28 million. The metal is from the reactor 3 at the Oskarshamn plant, where a large number of components are being replaced in connection with increasing output. Transportation of the material will start in the second quarter of 2009, after which processing at the Studsvik facility can start.
Contract with American FPL
In December Studsvik signed a long-term contract with the FPL Group for processing intermediate level waste at the Erwin facility. The contract is the first to be signed under Studsvik's new business model for intermediate level waste in the USA. The contract with the FPL Group will run up to and including 2013.
NET SALES AND PROFIT
Net sales were SEK 1,285.9 million (1,314.7). Sales in the USA fell by 26 per cent compared with the previous year. Other segments reported overall organic growth of 6 per cent in local currency. The decrease in the USA is mainly attributable to the operations in Erwin. As a result of the closure of the repository for intermediate level waste in Barnwell, South Carolina at the end of June, Studsvik took the Erwin facility temporarily out of operation. A new business model has been introduced for the operations and normal operation of the facility will be resumed in the first quarter of 2009.
The operating profit was SEK12.7 million (62.1). The Group reports negative earnings in the USA and the United Kingdom. The negative US earnings are attributable to the Erwin operations. The loss in the United Kingdom is mainly attributable to the costs of discontinuing a major project at Sellafield.
Sweden reached its 20 per cent operating margin target for 2008. Global Services and Germany reported by and large unchanged earnings compared with 2007.
Non-recurring items are included in the operating profits reported for 2007 and 2008. The table below presents these items and the adjusted operating profit.
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Reported operating profit | 12.7 | 62.1 |
| Capital gain | - | –23.3 |
| Costs of discontinued acquisition process | - | 10.5 |
| Restructuring costs, USA | 12.6 | - |
| Adjusted operating profit | 25.3 | 49.3 |
Foreign exchange effects in connection with the translation of foreign subsidiaries' operating profit amounted to SEK 2.1 million in 2008.
PROFITABILITY
The Group's operating margin was 1.0 (4.7) per cent and the profit margin was 0.1 (3.5) per cent.
Capital employed increased by SEK 108.5 to SEK 999.0 million. The turnover rate of capital employed was 1.4 (1.5) and the return on capital employed was 2.1 (7.9) per cent.
COMMENTS ON THE GROUP'S OPERATING SEGMENTS
Sweden
Studsvik is one of the major commercial players in the treatment of radioactive waste in Europe and treats waste mainly at its own facilities, but also to some extent at its customers' sites. By separation and volume reduction of the waste, separating metal waste that can be recycled and thus minimizing the amount of residual waste to be sent for final disposal, Studsvik contributes to reducing its customers' costs.
In the segment Studsvik mainly serves the European market with incineration of dry waste and treatment of metal scrap.
The operations performed well, with good growth and an operating profit that exceeded 2007. The incineration facility ran at full capacity, apart from during a short suspension of operations at the beginning of the year. Capacity utilization was good at the facility for treatment of metallic material as well as the production line for treatment of large components. Both the incineration facility and the metal waste treatment facility are starting 2009 with a good orderbook. All facilities have the capacity to process large volumes.
United Kingdom
Studsvik has established a strong position in the British market for decommissioning and waste treatment. In 2008 decommissioning activities were predominant but waste treatment successively increased. A decision was made to invest in a metals recycling facility and the project was started. Studsvik is part of the Nuclear Waste Management (NWM) consortium, which has been appointed to operate the UK low level radioactive waste repository. Studsvik owns 15 per cent of NWM.
The segment reported a loss in 2008. The loss is entirely attributable to the decommissioning operations and more specifically two major projects at Sellafield. The projects suffered repeated delays during the year. Studsvik decided to call off one project and renegotiate the conditions for the other. These measures reduce profit by SEK 6 million, which includes organizational adjustments.
Waste treatment operations, which include Studsvik's associated company Nuclear Waste Management, performed well with organic growth and satisfactory profitability. The reported earnings include a share in the profits of NWM of SEK 2.9 million (0).
The discontinuation of the projects at Sellafield resulted in a reduction in the volume of orders. The level of market activities in both waste treatment and decommissioning, however, continues to be high. Several contracts are being negotiated and capacity utilization will successively improve.
The metals recycling facility under construction will be brought into operation in the second quarter of 2009. The total investment cost is SEK 50 million, of which SEK 20.3 million was generated in 2008.
Germany
Germany includes Studsvik's operations in Continental Europe. In the segment Studsvik offers a broad range of services to operating nuclear power reactors and other nuclear facilities taken out of operation and in various phases of decommissioning. A considerable part of the business volume is generated during the time that the various nuclear power plants are shut down for refueling and maintenance outages, but a growing part of the business volume comes from consulting services.
Capacity utilization was high in the consulting and engineering and services operations. Market demand for consulting services is high; consequently there are good opportunities for continued growth with good profitability. Decommissioning operations reported growth toward the end of the year after a somewhat weak start. Decommissioning work at the Obrigheim power plant started after the customer, with a delay of over a year, had received the necessary licensing. Component manufacturing operations grew during the year but with unsatisfactory profitability. The management organization and work processes were changed towards the end of the year. An office opened in France, where a small consulting organization has been built up. The order situation is good in the German operations.
USA
Studsvik conducts waste treatment in two facilities in Erwin and Memphis in the state of Tennessee. In addition Studsvik has a logistics operation based in Memphis, with its own transport fleet of about 20 vehicles, with the capacity and competence to transport radioactive material. Wet low and intermediate waste is treated in Erwin, in a facility that uses Studsvik's patented pyrolysis technology THORSM. Other organic waste and metallic low level waste is treated in Memphis. The segment reported a loss in 2008.
As a result of the closure of the repository for intermediate level waste in Barnwell, South Carolina at the end of June 2008, deliveries of material to Studsvik's Erwin facility ceased. Studsvik therefore closed the facility temporarily and it was out of operation in the second half of the year. Studsvik has developed a new business model for treatment of intermediate level waste, which means that Studsvik treats waste at the Erwin facility as before, and thereafter takes responsibility for storage and final disposal through cooperation with Waste Control Specialists (WCS). Three power companies had signed agreements under the new model at the end of 2008 and talks were in progress with several potential customers. The Erwin facility will resume normal operation in the first quarter.
Business volumes fell at the facility in Memphis, partly due to tough competition in early 2008 and the operations were restructured. The efficiency program implemented had a good effect and, despite the continued tough market situation, performance improved towards the end of the year.
The general economic downturn combined with high fuel prices affected the Memphis-based logistics operations adversely. Capacity was cut from 60 vehicles at the start of the year to 20 at its close. The cuts made in the logistics operations were not sufficient to compensate for the fall in demand. Operations continued to report losses and further measures were taken towards the end of the year to improve efficiency.
The profit for the segment in 2008 includes restructuring costs for the Memphis-based operations of SEK 12.6 million.
In December Studsvik acquired a minority share (10 per cent) in the Erwin facility.
Studsvik's associated company THOR Treatment Technologies (TTT) developed well and reported a profit and positive cash flow in 2008. The segment earnings include a profit share in TTT of SEK 5.6 million.
Global Services
Studsvik is one of the world's foremost independent suppliers of tests, examinations and analyses of nuclear fuel and material as well as a world leader and in practice the only independent supplier in the field of fuel optimization software. The tests and analyses are carried out at Studsvik's laboratories in Sweden. The software is mainly developed in the USA.
The materials technology operations reported a continued positive trend. Sales and operating profit improved compared with the previous year. The orderbook is good and the volume of tenders is high. The consulting operations are growing successively and ALARA Holding, which was acquired in 2008, is performing well.
New sales of fuel optimization software were lower in 2008 than in the previous year, which meant that fullyear earnings were lower than last year. Variation between years is normal for the business and tender activity in the software area is very high. After the reporting period an order was signed with a Japanese customer for delivery of Studsvik's Gardel core monitoring system for a contract value of about SEK 7 million.
FINANCIAL POSITION AND LIQUIDITY
Cash and cash equivalents, including current investments, amounted to SEK 147.7 million (176.9).
Equity amounted to SEK 610.8 million (571.8).
The equity-assets ratio was 40.4 per cent (42.5).
Interest-bearing liabilities amounted to SEK 388.3 million (318.7).
The Group's borrowing was conducted entirely in foreign currencies in the course of investments and business acquisitions in the USA, Germany and the United Kingdom. After renegotiation the average maturity of the loan portfolio was extended to 4 years. The average interest rate on loans was by and large unchanged.
The Group's internally generated cash flow is considered to be sufficient for the Group's operating activities. Increased borrowing and an increase in equity may be necessary if one or more major acquisitions are contemplated. The parent company has full access to the subsidiaries' cash flows.
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE
The Group's capital expenditure amounted to SEK 108.4 million (127.3). Among the year's investments in growth may be mentioned the extension of the facility for treatment of metallic waste in the United Kingdom.
Acquisition of subsidiaries for SEK 11.2 million (46.2) is included in the year's capital expenditure.
At the end of 2008 the Group's commitments in respect of investment projects still in progress amounted to SEK 17.4 million (9.3). It is estimated that investments in progress will be financed using internal funds.
CASH FLOW
Cash flow from operating activities before working capital changes amounted to SEK 61.9 million (76.7). The working capital increased by SEK 32.4 million (37.7). The increase in 2008 is mainly attributable to payment of a current liability for final disposal of spent fuel from the company's shutdown R2 reactor. Cash flow from operating activities after investments was SEK –68.9 million (–36.4).
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Development projects are initiated and implemented both in cooperation with customers in the form of consulting contracts and within the framework of Studsvik's internal product development. Research expenditure is expensed as it is incurred. Identifiable expenditure for the development of new processes and products is capitalized to the extent it is expected to bring economic benefits.
In 2008 total costs of company-funded research and development amounted to SEK 44.8 million (41.8). Most resources were allocated to Studsvik's in-core fuel management codes. In software development the expenditure is a combination of maintenance of existing software and new development. As the economic benefits of the new development work are allocated over a very long period this expenditure is expensed as it arises.
MATERIAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
Studsvik operates on an international market that is exposed to competition. With operations in eight countries, Studsvik is exposed to both operational and financial risks. The Group's financial risk management is described in note 2 on page 58. Other risks are reported and commented on in the "Risks" section on page 32. The responsibility for risk assessment lies mainly within each subsidiary, but is reviewed and followed up by the parent company. The Group has a high security culture, which rests on a long tradition of clear routines for quality assurance and follow up in the context of various quality certification processes. The fact that Studsvik operates in the nuclear power sector entails special risks that are regulated and supervised by national agencies and international bodies.
DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR FACILITIES
The operations in Studsvik's nuclear facilities in Sweden are run under license pursuant to the Act on Nuclear Activities and it is therefore Studsvik's responsibility to decommission the facilities. Under the Act the holders of the licenses have both the technical and the financial responsibility for decommissioning. However, under the Act (1988:1597) on Financing the Handling of Certain Radioactive Waste etc ("the Studsvik Act"), the Swedish nuclear power producers pay a fee per generated kWh of electricity to the Government. The fees are funded for the purpose of covering costs for decommissioning a large part of Studsvik's nuclear facilities in Sweden. For its other nuclear facilities in Sweden, the Group makes provision in its own balance sheet for the obligation and issues collateral for performance in the form of bank guarantees to the Swedish Radiation Safety Authority and the County Administrative Board. A new Act that came into force in 2007 (2006:647) will replace the Studsvik Act in 2009. At that time it is the intention of the legislator and the authorities that the obligation under the Studsvik Act will have been fully settled. The Group's facilities that are not currently covered by the Studsvik Act will be covered by the new legislation. The Group expects that even in the future and in the context of the new legislation the obligation will be secured through bank guarantees issued to the authorities concerned.
Decommissioning of nuclear facilities taken out of operation and financed under the Studsvik Act is mainly undertaken by the subsidiary AB SVAFO. The company's obligation also includes restoring the Ranstad uranium mine in southern Sweden. Operations ceased in 1987. AB SVAFO is a wholly-owned subsidiary entirely financed by the Swedish Nuclear Waste Fund. The Nuclear Waste Fund covers the costs of its operations.
The Nuclear Waste Fund will also finance the future decommissioning of the Group's material testing reactor which ceased operation in 2005. The license holder of the facility is the wholly-owned subsidiary Studsvik Nuclear AB, which is consequently responsible for decommissioning.
INSURANCE
As a result of its geographical dispersion and its different lines of business, Studsvik is exposed to several types of third party risk. Studsvik's third party liability insurance is intended to cover Studsvik against the financial risks and consequences of its business. Studsvik's business is insured from two risk perspectives; nuclear liability and non-nuclear liability. The nuclear liability insurance is regulated by the Nuclear Liability Act in Sweden and corresponding legislation in the respective countries. Nuclear liability insurance for the Swedish operations is provided by Nordic Nuclear Insurance (NNI) and European Liability Insurance for the Nuclear Industry (ELINI). Liability insurance for the American operations is provided by the American Nuclear Insurers (ANI) Liability Insurance Pool. The non-nuclear operations are currently insured through a global liability insurance policy with the insurance company AIG.
Property and consequential loss insurance policies for the Swedish nuclear risks have been written by Nordic Nuclear Insurance and the European Mutual Association for Nuclear Insurance (EMANI). An EMANI nuclear insurance policy has also been taken out for the American Erwin facility. Non-nuclear property and consequential loss policies have been taken out in the respective countries.
EMPLOYEES AND THE ENVIRONMENT
The average number of employees in 2008 was 1,130 (1,141). A Groupwide Code of Conduct was introduced in 2008, which focuses on four areas of responsibility:
- Employees and organization
- Society
- Customers and suppliers
- Environment
In 2008 a stakeholder dialog was completed which will form the basis of Studsvik's continued corporate responsibility activities, which are also described on page 28. Studsvik publishes a separate Corporate Responsibility Report, which also deals with the company's environmental impact.
The number of work-related injuries resulting in sickness absence fell in 2008 to 22 from last year's 40. Studsvik has a program to reduce the number of workplace injuries. The collective radiation dose to personnel did not exceed the current limit values. For detailed information on radiation doses please refer to page 29.
The Group conducts activities requiring licenses in Sweden and the USA. Activities at the Group's Swedish facilities are licensed under the Swedish Environmental Code, the Act on Nuclear Activities and the Radiation Protection Act. Activities in the USA and the UK are conducted in a corresponding way in accordance with national legislation. The Swedish nuclear facilities that require a license under the Act on Nuclear Activities include nuclear reactors, laboratories where radioactive materials are used, facilities for treatment and intermediate storage of low and intermediate level waste and a facility for storage of nuclear material. The main environmental impact from the Group's facilities is from emissions and discharges to air and water. The licenses under which the nuclear facilities are operated state limit and recommended values for emissions and discharges to the exterior environment.
PARENT COMPANY
Parent company operations comprise the coordination of tasks for the Group and assets mainly consist of shares in subsidiaries. The parent company's net sales amounted to SEK 10.8 million (5.6). The operating loss was SEK –28.7 million (–38.3). The loss after financial items was SEK –25.8 million (–2.6). The profit for the previous year includes a capital gain of SEK 35.0 million from the sale of Studsvik Stensand AB and costs of a discontinued acquisition process in the UK of SEK –10.5 million.
The parent company's investments amounted to SEK 0.2 million (0.5). Cash and cash equivalents amounted to SEK 84.1 million (91.2) and interest-bearing liabilities to SEK 221.2 million (154.2).
INFORMATION ON THE ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION AND THE SHARE
There is no provision in Studsvik's Articles of Association that restricts the right to transfer shares. The company has not transferred any of its own shares or issued new shares during the financial year. The company is not aware of any agreements between shareholders that may result in restrictions on the right to transfer shares in the company. The company is not a party to any material agreement that is affected by any public take-over bid. The company's employees do not hold any shares for which the voting right cannot be exercised directly. The elected members of the Board of Directors are appointed by the Annual General Meeting. There is no provision in the Articles of Association concerning appointment and dismissal of Board members. Information on trading in the Studsvik share and ownership structure in 2008 can be found on pages 35–36.
BENEFITS TO SENIOR MANAGEMENT
The Annual General Meeting held on April 22, 2008 adopted the following principles for benefits to senior management.
Senior management executives will be offered a commercially competitive fixed salary based on the individual executive's responsibilities and powers. Salary will be fixed for a calendar year.
Senior management executives may be offered bonuses. Such bonuses may not exceed 50 per cent of fixed salary. Senior executives are entitled to convert bonuses to extra pension payments on their own initiative. Bonuses will primarily be based on the Group's financial targets. A bonus plan will be determined for the financial year.
Apart from the provisions of collective agreements or other agreements, senior management executives are entitled to arrange pension solutions on an individual basis. Salary or bonus may be used instead to increase pension allocation, given that the cost to Studsvik remains unchanged over time.
A maximum period of notice of 12 months from either senior management executives or Studsvik is applicable. Severance payments, apart from salary during the period of notice, may be made amounting to the equivalent of a maximum of 12 months' salary.
There is more information concerning benefits to senior management in note 36.
OUTLOOK
Modernization and increasing output of nuclear power plants is taking place in several of the countries where Studsvik operates. Decommissioning of nuclear facilities is expected to continue at least at the present rate in 2009. Demand for the services of the type Studsvik offers, including waste treatment, materials testing and consulting services is strong.
Studsvik's operations are only marginally affected by fluctuations in the economic cycle. With the exception of parts of the US operations, the financial unrest has not affected Studsvik's operations.
PROPOSED DISTRIBUTION OF PROFITS
The Board proposes that a dividend of SEK 1.00 (2.00) per share be distributed for the 2008 financial year and that the remaining non-restricted equity be retained in the company.
The total profits at the disposal of the Annual General Meeting comprise the Parent Company's non-restricted equity, SEK 591,302,461. The Board of Directors proposes that the profits be distributed as follows:
To the shareholders
| SEK 1.00 per share, a total of | SEK 8,218,611 |
|---|---|
| To be carried forward | SEK 583,083,850 |
| Total non-restricted equity | SEK 591,302,461 |
| in the parent company |
The proposed dividend to shareholders will reduce the Group's equity-assets ratio to 40.1 per cent. In light of the Group's business activities, the equity-assets ratio is adequate. It is expected that liquidity in the Company and Group can be maintained at a satisfactory level.
In the opinion of the Board of Directors the proposed dividend does not impede the Company, and other companies of the Group, from fulfilling their obligations in the short and long term.
The consolidated income statement and balance sheet and the parent company income statement and balance sheet will be adopted at the Annual General Meeting to be held on April 22, 2009. In our view, the consolidated accounts have been prepared in accordance with international financial reporting standards (IFRS) as adopted by the EU and give a true and fair view of the Group's financial position and results of operations. The annual accounts have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and give a true and fair view of the parent company's financial position and results of operations. The administration report for the Group and parent company provides a fair review of the development of the Group's and the parent company's business, financial position and performance and describes significant risks and uncertainties faced by the parent company and the companies that are part of the Group.
Nyköping, March 17, 2009
Anders Ullberg Anna Karinen Jan Barchan
Chairman Vice Chairman Board Member
Ingemar Eliasson Lars Engström Maria Lindberg
Board Member Board Member Employee representative
Alf Lindfors Per Ludvigsson Roger Lundström Board Member Board Member Employee representative
Magnus Groth President
Our audit report was submitted on March 25, 2009 PricewaterhouseCoopers AB
Magnus Brändström Göran Tidström Authorized public accountant Authorized public accountant Auditor in charge
Consolidated income statement
| Note | 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net sales | 4 | 1,285,951 | 1,314,647 |
| Costs of services sold | 7 | –986,303 | –1,000,017 |
| Gross profit | 299,648 | 314,630 | |
| Selling and marketing costs | 7–8 | –52,119 | –53,817 |
| Administrative expenses | 7 | –194,751 | –180,415 |
| Research and development costs | 7 | –44,817 | –41,754 |
| Share in earnings from associated companies | 17 | 8,465 | - |
| Other operating income | 5–6 | 2,848 | 25,088 |
| Other operating expenses | 5 | –6,545 | –1,628 |
| Operating profit | 4–9 | 12,729 | 62,104 |
| Financial income | 10, 12 | 7,415 | 8,716 |
| Financial expenses | 10, 12 | –19,448 | –24,834 |
| Profit before tax | 696 | 45,986 | |
| Income tax | 11 | 446 | 1,234 |
| NET PROFIT FOR THE YEAR | 1,142 | 47,220 | |
| Attributable to | |||
| – parent company's shareholders | –395 | 46,475 | |
| – minority interest | 1,537 | 745 | |
| Earnings per share | |||
| – before dilution | 13 | –0.05 | 5.65 |
| – after dilution | –0.05 | 5.65 |
Consolidated balance sheet
| Note | 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASSETS | |||
| Non-current assets | |||
| Property, plant and equipment | 15 | 503,740 | 406,594 |
| Intangible assets | 16 | 419,358 | 368,718 |
| Investments in associated companies | 17 | 22,064 | - |
| Deferred tax assets | 29 | 63,987 | 41,608 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 18, 20 | 55 | 356 |
| Trade and other receivables | 18, 21 | 15,344 | 25,372 |
| Total non-current assets | 1,024,548 | 842,648 | |
| Current assets | |||
| Inventories | 22 | 28,817 | 22,459 |
| Trade and other receivables | 18, 21 | 309,156 | 303,043 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 18, 20 | 516 | 933 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 18, 23 | 147,713 | 176,873 |
| Total current assets | 486,202 | 503,308 | |
| TOTAL ASSETS | 1,510,750 | 1,345,956 | |
| EQUITY | |||
| Capital and reserves attributable to parent company's shareholders | |||
| Share capital | 24 | 8,219 | 8,219 |
| Other contributed capital | 24 | 225,272 | 225,959 |
| Other reserves | 26 | 48,989 | –9,932 |
| Retained earnings | 25 | 327,985 | 344,130 |
| Equity attributable to the parent company's shareholders | 610,465 | 568,376 | |
| Minority interest | 320 | 3,457 | |
| Total equity | 610,785 | 571,833 | |
| LIABILITIES | |||
| Non-current liabilities | |||
| Borrowings | 18, 28 | 350,520 | 196,368 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 18, 20 | 1,209 | 52 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 29 | 34,329 | 40,889 |
| Pension obligations | 30 | 7,790 | 5,961 |
| Other provisions | 31 | 84,476 | 55,280 |
| Other non-current liabilities | 27 | 9,138 | 7,942 |
| Total non-current liabilities | 487,462 | 306,492 | |
| Current liabilities | |||
| Trade and other payables | 27 | 357,512 | 301,552 |
| Current tax liabilities | 5,644 | 11,502 | |
| Borrowings | 18, 28 | 37,742 | 122,287 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 18, 20 | 2,432 | 158 |
| Other provisions | 31 | 9,173 | 32,132 |
| Total current liabilities | 412,503 | 467,631 | |
| Total liabilities | 899,965 | 774,123 | |
| TOTAL EQUITY AND LIABLITIES | 1,510,750 | 1,345,956 |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
| Share capital | Other contributed capital |
Other reserves Retained earnings | Minority interest | Total equity | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Opening balance at January 1, 2007 | 8,219 | 225,959 | 7,653 | 316,534 | 286 | 558,651 |
| Transfers within equity | –2,442 | 2,442 | 0 | |||
| Change in translation differences | –17,585 | –16 | –17,601 | |||
| Total transactions recognized directly in equity |
–17,585 | –2,442 | 2,426 | –17,601 | ||
| Profit for the year stated in the income statement | 46,475 | 745 | 47,220 | |||
| Total income and expenses stated for the | 46,475 | 745 | 47,220 | |||
| period | ||||||
| Dividend | –16,437 | –16,437 | ||||
| Closing balance at December 31, 2007 | 8,219 | 225,959 | –9,932 | 344,130 | 3,457 | 571,833 |
| Opening balance at January 1, 2008 | 8,219 | 225,959 | –9,932 | 344,130 | 3,457 | 571,833 |
| Transfers within equity | –687 | 687 | 0 | |||
| Change in translation differences | 58,580 | 938 | 59,518 | |||
| Cash flow hedges | 463 | 463 | ||||
| Tax attributable to items recognized directly in equity |
–122 | –122 | ||||
| Acquisition of minority | –5,612 | –5,612 | ||||
| Total transactions recognized directly in equity | –687 | 58,921 | 687 | –4,674 | 54,247 | |
| Profit for the year stated in the income statement | –395 | 1,537 | 1,142 | |||
| Total income and expenses stated for the period | –395 | 1,537 | 1,142 | |||
| Dividend | –16,437 | –16,437 | ||||
| Closing balance at December 31, 2008 | 8,219 | 225,272 | 48,989 | 327,985 | 320 | 610,785 |
Consolidated cash flow statement
| Note | 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash flow from operating activities | |||
| Operating profit | 12,729 | 62,104 | |
| Adjustment for non-cash items | 32 | 60,942 | 37,504 |
| 73,671 | 99,608 | ||
| Interest received | 5,406 | 8,716 | |
| Interest paid | –18,458 | –24,834 | |
| Income tax paid | 1,204 | –6,811 | |
| Cash flow from operating activities before change in working capital | 61,823 | 76,679 | |
| Change in working capital | |||
| – Current assets | –24,929 | –52,309 | |
| – Other current liabilities | –7,459 | 14,589 | |
| Cash flow from operating activities | 29,435 | 38,959 | |
| Cash flow from investing activities | |||
| Acquisition of subsidiaries | 35 | –6,045 | –41,869 |
| Sale of subsidiary | - | 45,766 | |
| Purchases of property, plant and equipment | 15 | –95,528 | –80,512 |
| Sale of property, plant and equipment | 4,165 | 1,225 | |
| Purchases of intangible assets | 16 | –1,696 | - |
| Dividend from associated company | 17 | 744 | - |
| Cash flow from investing activities | –98,360 | –75,390 | |
| Cash flow from financing activities | |||
| Loans raised | 166,048 | 15,444 | |
| Repayments of loans | –119,368 | –34,525 | |
| Dividend | –16,437 | –16,437 | |
| Cash flow from financing activities | 30,243 | –35,518 | |
| Decrease in cash and cash equivalents | –38,682 | –71,949 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year | 176,873 | 247,574 | |
| Translation difference | 9,522 | 1,248 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of the year | 23 | 147,713 | 176,873 |
Parent company income statement
| Note | 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net sales | 38 | 10,798 | 5,634 |
| Costs of services sold | –7,911 | –5,395 | |
| Gross profit | 2,887 | 239 | |
| Selling and marketing costs | - | - | |
| Administrative expenses | –32,366 | –39,340 | |
| Other operating income | 770 | 795 | |
| Operating profit | 38–41 | –28,709 | –38,306 |
| Interest income and similar profit/loss items | 43 | 13,918 | 51,326 |
| Interest expense and similar profit/loss items | 44 | –11,065 | –15,631 |
| Profit before tax | –25,856 | –2,611 | |
| Appropriations | 45 | 4,363 | 329 |
| Income tax | 46–47 | 6,955 | 10,460 |
| NET PROFIT FOR THE YEAR | –14,538 | 8,178 |
Parent company balance sheet
| Note | 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASSETS | |||
| Non-current assets | |||
| Property, plant and equipment | 48 | ||
| – Equipment and tools, buildings, land | 704 | 1,664 | |
| Financial assets | 49 | ||
| – Deferred tax assets | 2,574 | 2,680 | |
| – Shares and participations in subsidiaries | 51 | 779,119 | 779,397 |
| – Receivables from Group companies | 221,362 | 154,094 | |
| Trade and other receivables | 12,148 | 10,918 | |
| Total non-current assets | 1,015,907 | 948,753 | |
| Current assets | |||
| Inventories and goods for resale | 508 | 423 | |
| Trade and other receivables | 1,635 | 12,279 | |
| Derivative financial instruments | 57 | 15 | 71 |
| Receivables from Group companies | 36,461 | 42,312 | |
| Prepaid expenses and accrued income | 50 | 1,515 | 1,045 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 84,119 | 91,210 | |
| Total current assets | 124,253 | 147,340 | |
| TOTAL ASSETS | 1,140,160 | 1,096,093 | |
| EQUITY | |||
| Equity | |||
| Share capital | 8,219 | 8,219 | |
| Restricted reserves | 225,272 | 225,272 | |
| Total restricted equity | 233,491 | 233,491 | |
| Non-restricted equity | |||
| Non-restricted reserves | 605,839 | 591,418 | |
| Net profit for the year | –14,538 | 8,178 | |
| Total non-restricted equity | 591,301 | 599,596 | |
| Total equity | 824,792 | 833,087 | |
| Untaxed reserves | 52 | 2,510 | 6,874 |
| LIABILITIES | |||
| Non-current liabilities | |||
| Liabilities to credit institutions | 53 | 201,915 | 137,113 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 4 | 20 | |
| Liabilities to Group companies | 38,106 | 48,106 | |
| Other liabilities | 9,138 | 7,942 | |
| Total non-current liabilities | 249,163 | 193,181 | |
| Current liabilities | |||
| Liabilities to Group companies | 31,469 | 34,821 | |
| Accounts payable | 2,563 | 2,747 | |
| Liabilities to credit institutions | 53 | 19,250 | 17,125 |
| Other liabilities | 1,484 | 1,357 | |
| Accrued expenses and deferred income | 54 | 8,929 | 6,901 |
| Total current liabilities | 63,695 | 62,951 | |
| Total liabilities | 312,858 | 256,132 | |
| TOTAL EQUITY AND LIABLITIES | 1,140,160 | 1,096,093 | |
PARENT COMPANY STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
| Share capital | Statutory reserve |
Non-restricted equity |
Total equity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Opening balance at January 1, 2007 | 8,219 | 225,272 | 581,052 | 814,543 |
| Group contribution received | 37,226 | 37,226 | ||
| Tax effect of group contributions | –10,423 | –10,423 | ||
| Dividend | –16,437 | –16,437 | ||
| Net profit for the year | 8,178 | 8,178 | ||
| Closing balance at December 31, 2007 | 8,219 | 225,272 | 599,596 | 833,087 |
| Opening balance at January 1, 2008 | 8,219 | 225,272 | 599,596 | 833,087 |
| Group contribution received | 31,500 | 31,500 | ||
| Tax effect of group contributions | –8,820 | –8,820 | ||
| Dividend | –16,437 | –16,437 | ||
| Net profit for the year | –14,538 | –14,538 | ||
| Closing balance at December 31, 2008 | 8,219 | 225,272 | 591,301 | 824,792 |
Parent company cash flow statement
| Note | 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash flow from operating activities | |||
| Operating profit | –28,709 | –38,306 | |
| Adjustment for non-cash items | 59 | –434 | –849 |
| –29,143 | –39,155 | ||
| Interest received | 6,738 | 16,121 | |
| Interest paid | –8,553 | –14,526 | |
| Income tax paid | 9,652 | –133 | |
| Cash flow from operating activities before change in working capital | –21,306 | –37,693 | |
| Change in working capital | |||
| – Current assets | –269 | –1,447 | |
| – Other current liabilities | –11,201 | –46,962 | |
| Cash flow from operating activities | –32,776 | –86,102 | |
| Cash flow from investing activities | |||
| Investment in subsidiaries | - | –32,875 | |
| Sale of subsidiary | - | 47,999 | |
| Sale of property, plant and equipment | 1,576 | 1,352 | |
| Loans to subsidiaries | 49 | –31,150 | 17,376 |
| Disposal of other financial assets | - | 587 | |
| Purchases of property, plant and equipment | 48 | –182 | –533 |
| Cash flow from investing activities | –29,756 | 33,906 | |
| Cash flow from financing activities | |||
| Repayments of loans | –25,213 | –269,746 | |
| Loans raised | 59,865 | 251,019 | |
| Dividend paid | –16,437 | –16,437 | |
| Group contribution received | 37,226 | 28,919 | |
| Cash flow from financing activities | 55,441 | –6,245 | |
| Decrease in cash and cash equivalents | –7,091 | –58,441 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year | 91,210 | 149,651 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of the year | 84,119 | 91,210 |
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED ACCOUNTS
Amounts in SEK '000 unless otherwise stated
Note 1 Accounting policies and valuation principles
The principal accounting policies applied in the preparation of these consolidated accounts are set out below. These policies have been applied consistently to all the years presented, unless otherwise stated.
1.1. BASIS OF PREPARATION
The consolidated accounts for the Studsvik Group have been prepared in accordance with the Annual Accounts Act, the Swedish Financial Accounting Standards Council's recommendation RR 30, Supplementary accounting rules for groups and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted by the EU. The consolidated accounts have been prepared in accordance with the historical cost method except as regards remeasurement of land and buildings, available for sale financial assets and financial assets and liabilities (including derivative instruments) carried at fair value through profit or loss.
Preparing statements in accordance with IFRS requires the use of a number of important accounting estimates. Furthermore, the management must make certain judgements when applying the Group's accounting policies. The areas that entail a high degree of judgement, which are complex or of such a nature that assumptions and estimates are critical to the consolidated accounts are specified in note 3.
Standards, amendments and interpretations that have come into force and are applied by the Group
IFRS 7, Financial instruments: Disclosures, and the supplementary amendment to IAS 1, Presentation of financial statements – Capital disclosures, introduces new disclosures regarding financial instruments. IFRS 7 has no impact on classification and valuation of the Group's financial instruments.
IFRIC 8, Scope of IFRS 2, requires that transactions concerning the issuing of own equity instruments - where the consideration received is less than the fair value of the equity instruments issued - are examined to determine whether they fall under the scope of IFRS 2. This interpretation has no impact on the Group's financial reporting.
IFRIC 10, Interim financial reporting and impairment, does not allow reversal of impairment losses recognized on the balance sheet in a previous interim period in respect of goodwill, investment in equity instruments or a financial asset carried at cost. This interpretation has no impact on the Group's financial reporting.
IFRIC 14, IAS 19 - The limit on a defined benefit asset, minimum funding requirements and their interaction. IFRIC 14 provides guidance when assessing the limit in IAS 19 of the amount of the surplus that can be recognized as an asset. It also explains how the pension's asset or liability may be affected when there is a statutory or contractual minimum funding requirement. This interpretation has no impact on the Group's financial reporting, since there is no net asset in any of the Group's pension plans and these plans do not include a minimum funding requirement.
Interpretation applied by the Group in advance
IFRS 8, Operating Segments, was applied in advance by the Group in 2008. IFRS 8 replaces IAS 14, Segment reporting, and adapts the segment reporting to the requirements of the USA standard SFAS 131, Disclosures about segments of an enterprise and related information. The new standard requires reporting from the management perspective, where segment reporting is presented as it is used in management accounting. Moreover, the segments must be reported more in line with the internal reports submitted to the chief operating decisionmaker. There is no impact on valuation of the company's assets and liabilities. Figures for comparison for 2007 have been restated.
Standards, amendments and interpretations in force, but which are not relevant to the Group
The following standards, amendments and interpretations of published standards are compulsory for financial years starting on January 1, 2008 or later, but are not relevant to the Group.
- IFRS 4, Insurance contracts,
- IFRIC 7, Applying the restatement approach under IAS 29, Financial reporting in hyperinflationary economies,
- IFRIC 9, Reassessment of embedded derivatives,
- IFRIC 11, Group and treasury share transactions, and
- IFRIC 12, Service concession arrangements.
Standards, amendments and interpretation of existing standards that as yet have not come into force and that are not applied in advance by the Group
The following new standards and amendments and interpretations of existing standards have been published and are compulsory for the Group's accounting for the financial year starting on January 1, 2009 or later, but have not been applied in advance by the Group:
- IAS 1 (Amendment), Presentation of financial statements (applies from January 1, 2009). This amendment of the standard is still subject to the EU endorsement process. The amendments mainly entail changes in formats and names of the financial reports. Consequently the future presentation of the Group's financial reports will be affected when this standard is introduced.
- IAS 23 (Amendment), Borrowing costs (applies from January 1, 2009). This amendment of the standard is still subject to the EU endorsement process. The amendment requires that companies capitalize borrowing costs that are directly attributable to acquisition, construction or production of an asset that takes a substantial period of time to get ready for its intended use or sale, as a part of the cost of that asset. The alternative of immediate expensing of borrowing costs will be removed. The Group capitalizes borrowing costs in 2008 attributable to investment in the new waste facility in the UK.
- IAS 27 (Amendment), Consolidated and separate financial statements (applies from July 1, 2009). This amendment of the standard is still subject to the EU endorsement process. The amendment means that profit attributable to minority shareholders must always be reported even if it means the minority share is negative, that transactions with minority shareholders must always be reported in equity, and that if a parent company loses the controlling interest any remaining participation must be remeasured to fair value. The amendment of the standard will affect reporting of future transactions.
- IFRS 2 Share-based payment (Amendment) Vesting conditions and cancellations (applies from January 1, 2009). This amendment of the standard is still subject to the EU endorsement process. The amendment affects the definition of vesting conditions and introduces a new concept, "non-vesting conditions" (conditions that are not defined as vesting conditions). The standard states that "non-vesting conditions" must be taken into account when estimating the fair value of equity instruments. Goods or services received by a counterparty that satisfy all other vesting conditions must be recognized irrespective of whether "non-vesting conditions" are satisfied or not. This amendment has no impact on the Group's financial reporting.
- IFRS 3 (Amendment), Business combinations (applies from July 1, 2009). This amendment of the standard is still subject to the EU endorsement process. The amendment applies prospectively after the effective date. The application will entail a change in how future acquisitions are reported, including accounting for transaction costs, any conditional purchase prices or successive purchases. The Group will apply the standard from the financial year starting on January 1, 2010. The amendment of the standard will not have any impact on previous acquisitions, but will affect reporting of future transactions.
1
- IAS 32 (Amendment), Financial Instruments: Classification, and IAS 1 (Amendment), Presentation of financial statements – Puttable financial instruments and obligations arising on liquidation (applies from January 1, 2009). Under the amended standards, puttable financial instruments and instruments, or components of instruments that impose on the company an obligation to deliver to another party a pro-rata share of the net assets of the company only on liquidation will be classified as equity, on condition that the financial instruments have particular properties and fulfill certain conditions. The Group will apply IAS 32 and IAS 1 from January 1, 2009, but this is not expected to have any impact on the Group's financial reporting.
- IAS 23 (Amendment), Borrowing costs (applies from January 1, 2009). The amendment is a part of the IASB's annual improvements project published in May 2008. An amendment has been made to the definition of borrowing costs so that interest expense is calculated using the effective interest method as defined in IAS 39, Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement. This eliminates the difference between IAS 39 and IAS 23. The Group will apply IAS 23 on capitalization of borrowing costs prospectively from January 1, 2009.
- IAS 28 (Amendment), Investments in Associates (and the consequent amendments to IAS 32, Financial Instruments: Classification, and IFRS 7, Financial instruments: Disclosures) (applies from January 1, 2009). The amendment is a part of the IASB's annual improvements project published in May 2008. A holding in an associated company is treated as a separate asset as regards testing for impairment and any impairment loss is not allocated to specific assets included in the holding, such as goodwill. Reversals of impairment losses are reported as an adjustment of the value of the investment to the extent the recoverable amount of the associated company increases. The Group will apply IAS 28 for impairment testing of investments in associates and related impairment losses from January1, 2009.
Interpretations of existing standards that as yet have not come into force and that are not relevant to the Group
The following interpretations of existing standards have been published and are compulsory for the Group for financial years starting on January 1, 2008 or later, but are not relevant to the Group.
- IFRIC 13, Customer loyalty programmes1 (applies from July 1, 2008). This interpretation is still subject to the EU endorsement process. IFRIC 13 clarifies that when goods or services are sold together with some form of customer loyalty incentive (for example loyalty points or free products) these are multiple elements arrangements. The payment received from the customer is allocated between the different elements of the arrangement on the basis of the fair value of the respective element. IFRIC 13 is not relevant to the Group since no Group company offers any loyalty program.
- IFRIC 15, Agreements for the construction of real estate (applies from January 1, 2009). The interpretation clarifies whether IAS 18, Revenue, or IAS 11, Construction Contracts, is applicable to certain transactions. This will probably lead to IAS 18 being applied to more transactions. IFRIC 15 is not relevant to the Group's operations, since all revenue is accounted for under IAS 18.
- IFRIC 17, Distributions of non-cash assets to owners (applies to the financial year starting on July 1, 2009 or later). IFRIC 17 provides guidance stating that a liability referring to a non-cash dividend should be recognized when the company has an obligation to its shareholders and that the liability is to be recognized at fair value. When the obligation is settled, i.e. the dividend paid, the assets distributed to settle the obligation are to be revalued at fair value. The result of the revaluation is to be recognized in the income statement. IFRIC 17 also states that IFRS 5, Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations, is applicable to non-current assets available for distribution. The Group will apply IFRIC 17 for non-cash dividends and in cases where dividends are a mixture of non-cash and cash, prospectively from January 1, 2010.
1.2 PARENT COMPANY
The parent company has prepared its annual accounts in accordance with the Annual Accounts Act (1995:1554) and the Swedish Financial Accounting Standards Council's recommendation RR 32:06, Accounting for Legal Entities (Separate financial statements). RR 32:06 means that the parent company, in its separate financial statements, must apply all the IFRS and statements adopted by the EU as far as possible, subject to the Annual Accounts Act and taking into account the connection between accounting and taxation. The recommendation specifies the exemptions and additions that must be made in relation to IFRS. The differences between the Group's and the Parent Company's accounting policies are presented below. The main differences between the accounting policies applied by the Group and the Parent Company are:
Shares and participations in subsidiaries
Investments in subsidiaries are recorded at the lower of cost and fair value. Assessments are made as to whether the book amount corresponds to fair value and the book amount is written down if the impairment is deemed permanent.
Income
The Parent Company's income includes dividends received from subsidiaries and other internal transactions that are eliminated in the consolidated accounts.
Leases
All leases, regardless of whether they are finance or operating leases, are recorded as rental agreements (operating leases).
Pensions
Pension obligations refer to defined contribution plans and are covered by insurance arrangements.
Taxes
The accumulated values of accelerated depreciation and other untaxed reserves are presented in the parent company balance sheet under the item Untaxed reserves with no deduction for the deferred tax. Changes in the untaxed reserves are shown on a separate line in the income statement in the parent company income statement. The consolidated accounts, however, divide untaxed reserves into deferred tax liability and equity.
Group contributions and shareholders' contributions for legal entities
The company reports group contributions and shareholders' contributions in accordance with the statements of the Swedish Financial Accounting Standards Council's Emerging Issues Task Force. Shareholders' contributions are recognized directly in the equity of the recipient and capitalized in shares and participations by the giver, to the extent there is no impairment loss. Group contributions are reported in accordance with their financial significance. This means that the group contributions made for the purpose of minimizing the Group's total tax are recognized directly in retained earnings less the current tax effect.
1.3 CONSOLIDATED ACCOUNTS
Subsidiaries
Subsidiaries are all the companies in which the Group has the power to govern financial and operating policies, generally accompanying a shareholding of more than half of the voting rights. Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the Group. They are de-consolidated from the date that control ceases.
The purchase method of accounting is used to account for the acquisition of subsidiaries by the Group. The cost of an acquisition is measured as the fair value of the assets provided in payment, equity instruments issued and liabilities incurred or assumed at the date of exchange plus costs directly attributable to the acquisition. Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed in a business combination are measured initially at their fair value at the acquisition date, irrespective of the extent of any minority interest. The excess of the cost of acquisition over the fair value of the Group's share of the identifiable net assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities acquired is recorded as goodwill. If the cost of acquisition is less than the fair value of the net assets of the subsidiary acquired, the difference is recognized directly in the income statement.
Inter-company transactions, balances and unrealized gains on transactions between Group companies are eliminated. Unrealized losses are also eliminated, but any losses are regarded as an indication of an impairment of the asset transferred. Accounting policies of subsidiaries have been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the policies adopted by the Group.
Transactions with minority shareholders
The Group policy is to state transactions with minority shareholders as transactions with a third party. Divestments to minority shareholders generate gains and losses for the Group that are recognized in the income statement. For minority share acquisitions in which the purchase price exceeds the acquired share of the carrying amount of the subsidiary's net assets, the difference is recognized as goodwill. For divestments to minority shareholders in which the purchase price received differs from the carrying amount of the interest in the divested net assets, a gain or loss arises. This gain or loss is recognized in the income statement.
Associated companies
Associated companies are all entities over which the Group has significant influence but not control, generally accompanying a shareholding of between 20 per cent and 50 per cent of the voting rights. Investments in associated companies are accounted for in accordance with the equity method and initially recorded at cost. The Group's carrying amount for investments in associated companies includes goodwill identified on acquisition, net of any impairment.
The Group's share of the post-acquisition profit or loss of an associated company is recognized in the income statement and its share of post-acquisition changes in reserves is recognized in the Reserves item. The cumulative post-acquisition changes are adjusted against the carrying amount of the investment. When the Group's share of losses in an associated company equals or exceeds its interest in the associated company, including any unsecured receivables, the Group does not recognize further losses, unless it has incurred obligations or made payments on behalf of the associated company.
1.4 SEGMENT REPORTING
Operating segments must be reported in line with the internal reports submitted to the chief operating decisionmaker. The chief operating decisionmaker has been identified as the President.
1.5 FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION
Functional and presentation currency
Items included in the financial statements of each of the Group's entities are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates (functional currency). The consolidated financial statements are presented in SEK, which is the parent company's functional and presentation currency.
Transactions and balances
Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation at year-end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognized in the income statement.
Translation differences for non-monetary financial assets and liabilities are recorded as part of fair value gains/losses. Translation differences for non-monetary financial assets and liabilities, such as shares recognized at fair value in the income statement, are recorded in the income statement as part of fair value gains/losses.
Group companies
The results and financial position of all the Group companies (none of which has the currency of a hyperinflationary economy) that have a functional currency different from the presentation currency are translated into the Group's presentation currency as follows:
a) assets and liabilities for each balance sheet presented are translated at closing rates.
b) income and expenses for each income statement are translated at average exchange rates.
c) all resulting exchange differences are recognized as a separate component of equity.
On consolidation, exchange differences arising from the translation of the net investment in foreign operations, and of borrowings and other currency instruments designated as hedges of such investments, are taken to shareholders' equity. When a foreign business is sold, fully or partly, the currency differences reported in equity are transferred to the income statement and recognized as part of the capital gain/ loss. Goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on the acquisition of a foreign entity are treated as assets and liabilities of the foreign entity and translated at the closing rate.
1.6 PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost of acquisition less depreciation. The cost of acquisition includes expenditure that is directly attributable to the acquisition of the asset, expenditure for dismantling and restoration is added to the cost of acquisition and reported as a separate component.
Subsequent expenditure is included in the asset's carrying amount or recognized as a separate asset, as appropriate, only when it is probable that the future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the Group and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. The carrying amount for the replaced part is removed from the balance sheet. All other repairs and maintenance are charged to the income statement during the financial period in which they are incurred.
Land is not depreciated. Depreciation on other assets is calculated using the straight-line method to allocate their cost or revalued amounts to their residual values over their estimated useful lives as follows:
| ƒ buildings | 25–50 years |
|---|---|
| ƒ machinery | 3–20 years |
| ƒ equipment and fixtures and fittings | 3–15 years |
The assets' residual values and useful lives are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at each balance sheet date.
An asset's carrying amount is written down immediately to its recoverable amount if the asset's carrying amount is greater than its estimated recoverable amount.
Gains and losses on disposals are determined by comparing sales proceeds with the carrying amount and are recorded under Other gains/losses – net in the income statement.
1.7 INTANGIBLE ASSETS Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquisition over the fair value of the Group's share of the net identifiable assets of the acquired subsidiary/associated company at the date of acquisition. Goodwill on acquisition of subsidiaries is included in Intangible assets. Goodwill on acquisition of associated companies is included in the value of investments in associated companies and tested for impairment as part of the value of the total investment. Goodwill that is disclosed separately is tested annually for impairment and recognized at cost less accumulated impairment losses. Goodwill impairment loss is not reversed. Gains and losses on the disposal of an entity include the carrying amount of goodwill relating to the entity sold.
Goodwill is allocated to cash-generating units when tested for impairment. Allocation is to the cash-generating units or groups of cash-generating units that are expected to benefit from the business combination giving rise to the goodwill item. The Group allocates goodwill to all segments in all countries where the Group operates.
Computer software
Acquired computer software licenses are capitalized on the basis of the costs incurred to acquire and bring to use the specific software. These capitalized costs are amortized over the estimated useful life (normally 10 years).
Costs associated with developing or maintaining computer software are recognized as an expense as incurred.
Development costs for software recognized as an asset are amortized over the estimated useful life.
Renting and similar rights
Renting and similar rights consist mainly of customer relations and contracts. Documents to verify their capitalization could be business plans, budgets or the company's assessments of future outcomes. An individual assessment is made for each item. Amortization starts when the asset is ready for use and subsequently continues over the estimated useful life.
1.8 IMPAIRMENT LOSSES ON NON-FINANCIAL ASSETS
Assets that have an indefinite useful life, such as goodwill, are not subject to amortization and are tested annually for impairment. Assets that are subject to amortization are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognized for the amount by which the asset's carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of an asset's fair value less selling costs and value in use. For the purposes of assessing impairment, assets are grouped at the lowest levels for which there are separately identifiable cash flows (cash-generating units). Assets other than financial assets and goodwill for which an impairment loss has previously been recognized, are tested to establish if any reversal should be made.
1
1.9 FINANCIAL ASSETS
The Group classifies its financial assets in the following categories: financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, loans and receivables and financial assets available for sale. The classification depends on the purpose for which the financial asset was acquired. The management determines the classification of financial assets when they are first reported.
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are financial assets held for trading. A financial asset is classified in this category if it is acquired mainly for the purpose of selling in the short term. Derivatives are classified as held for trading if they are not designated as hedging instruments. Assets in this category are classified as current assets.
Loans and receivables
Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. They are included in current assets, except for maturities greater than 12 months after the balance sheet date. These are classified as non-current assets. The Group's loans and receivables comprise Trade and other receivables and Cash and cash equivalents in the balance sheet.
Available for sale financial assets
Available for sale financial assets are any non-derivative financial assets designated on initial recognition as available for sale or not classified in any of the other categories. They are included in non-current assets, unless management intends to dispose of the asset within 12 months of the balance sheet date. At present the Group holds no such assets.
1.10 DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
Derivatives are recognized in the balance sheet on the date of the contract at fair value, both initially and on subsequent remeasurement. The method of reporting the gain or loss arising on revaluation depends on whether the derivative is identified as a hedging instrument, and, if so, the nature of the hedged item. The Group identifies certain derivatives as either:
(a) a hedge of the fair value of a recognized asset or liability or a firm commitment (fair value hedge),
(b) a hedge of a particular risk associated with a recognized asset or liability or a highly probable forecast transaction (cash flow hedge).
When the transaction is entered into, the Group documents the relationship between the hedging instrument and the hedged item, as well as the Group's risk management objective and strategy for undertaking the hedge. The Group also documents its assessment, both when the hedge is undertaken and on a continuous basis, of whether the derivative instruments used in hedging transactions are effective in offsetting the changes in the fair value or cash flows of the hedged items.
Information on the fair value of the different derivative instruments used for hedging purposes is given in note 20. The entire fair value of a derivative designated as a hedging instrument is classified as a non-current asset or liability when the remaining maturity of the hedged item is more than 12 months and as a current asset or liability when the remaining maturity of the hedged item is less than 12 months. Derivative instruments held for trading are always classified as current assets or current liabilities.
Cash flow hedging
When a hedging instrument matures or is sold or when the hedge no longer fulfils the criteria for hedge accounting and accumulated gains or losses referring to the hedge are in equity, these gains/losses remain in equity and are recognized in revenue at the time when the forecast transactions are ultimately reported in the income statement. When a forecast transaction is no longer expected to occur, the accumulated gains or losses deferred in equity must immediately be taken to the income statement item Other gains/losses – net.
1.11 INVENTORIES
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. The cost of finished goods and work in progress comprises raw materials, direct labor, other direct costs and related production overheads. Borrowing costs are not included. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less applicable variable selling expenses.
1.12 TRADE RECEIVABLES
Trade receivables are initially recognized at fair value and thereafter at amortized cost, applying the effective interest method, less any provision for impairment. A provision for impairment of trade receivables is established when there is objective evidence that the Group will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the original terms of receivables. Significant financial difficulties of the debtor, probability that the debtor will enter bankruptcy or other financial reorganization and default or delinquency in payment (more than 30 days overdue) are regarded as indicators of impairment of a trade receivable. The size of the provision is the difference between the carrying amount of the asset and the present value of estimated future cash flows, discounted using the original effective interest rate. The carrying amount of the asset is reduced by using a depreciation account and the loss is recorded in the income statement under Selling expenses. When a trade receivable cannot be collected it is written off against the depreciation account for trade receivables. Recovery of amounts previously written off are credited to Selling expenses in the income statement.
1.13 CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash and cash equivalents includes cash in hand, bank balances and other shortterm liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less of the date of acquisition.
1.14 SHARE CAPITAL
Ordinary shares are classified as equity.
Transaction costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares or options are shown in equity as a deduction, net of tax, from the proceeds.
1.15 TRADE PAYABLES
Trade payables are initially recognized at fair value and thereafter at amortized cost, applying the effective interest method.
1.16 BORROWINGS
Borrowings are initially recognized at fair value, net after transaction costs. Borrowings are thereafter recognized at amortized cost and any difference between the amount received (net of transaction costs) and repayment amount is recognized in the income statement allocated over the period of the loan, applying the effective interest method.
Borrowings are classified as current liabilities unless the Group has an unconditional right to defer settlement of the liability for at least 12 months after the balance sheet date.
1.17 CURRENT AND DEFERRED INCOME TAX
The current tax expense is calculated on the basis of the tax laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted on the balance sheet date in the countries in which the parent company's subsidiaries and associated companies operate and generate taxable revenues. The management regularly assesses claims made in tax returns for situations where applicable tax rules are subject to interpretation and, where deemed appropriate, makes provision for amounts that will probably have to be paid to the tax authorities.
Deferred tax is recognized in its entirety, using the balance sheet method, on all temporary differences arising between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the consolidated accounts. However, the deferred tax is not recognized if it arises as a consequence of a transaction constituting the initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction other than a business combination that, at the time of the transaction, affects neither accounting profit nor taxable profit. Deferred income tax is determined using tax rates (and laws) that have been enacted or substantially enacted by the balance sheet date and are expected to apply when the related deferred tax asset is realized or the deferred tax liability is settled.
Deferred tax assets are recognized to the extent it is probable that future taxable profit will be available against which the temporary differences can be applied.
Deferred tax is calculated on all temporary differences arising on participations in subsidiaries, apart from when the time of reversal of the temporary difference can be controlled by the Group and it is probable that the temporary difference will not be reversed in the foreseeable future.
1.18 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS Pension obligations
The Group companies operate various pension schemes. The schemes are generally funded through payments to insurance companies or trustee-administered funds, in which the payments are determined on the basis of periodic actuarial calculations. The Group has both defined benefit and defined contribution plans. A defined contribution plan is a pension plan under which the Group pays fixed contributions into a separate legal entity. The Group has no legal or constructive obligation to pay further contributions if this legal entity does not have sufficient assets to pay all employee benefits associated with the employees' service in the current or prior periods. A defined benefit plan is a pension plan that is not a defined contribution plan. It is characteristic of defined benefit plans that they define an amount of pension benefit that an employee will receive on retirement, usually dependent on one or more factors such as age, years of service and compensation.
The liability recognized in the balance sheet in respect of defined benefit pension plans is the present value of the defined benefit obligation at the balance sheet date less the fair value of plan assets, together with adjustments for unrecognized actuarial gains or losses and for unrecognized costs for past service costs. The defined benefit obligation is calculated annually by independent actuaries using the projected unit credit method. The present value of the defined benefit obligation is determined by discounting the estimated future cash outflows using interest rates of high-quality corporate bonds that are denominated in the currency in which the benefits will be paid and that have terms to maturity approximating to the terms of the related pension liability.
Actuarial gains and losses as a result of experience adjustments and changes in actuarial assumptions are reported in equity in the account of reported income and expense in the period in which they arise.
Past service costs are recognized immediately in the income statement, unless the changes in the pension plan are conditional on the employees remaining in service for a specified period of time (the vesting period). In this case, the past service costs are recognized in income by amortization on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.
For defined contribution plans, the Group pays contributions to publicly or privately administered pension insurance plans on a mandatory, contractual or voluntary basis. The Group has no further payment obligations once the contributions have been paid. The contributions are recognized as employee benefit expense when they are due. Prepaid contributions are recognized as an asset to the extent that cash refund or a reduction in the future payments is available to the Group.
Termination benefits
Termination benefits are payable when employment is terminated by the Group before the normal retirement date, or whenever an employee accepts voluntary redundancy or in exchange for these benefits. The Group recognizes termination benefits when it is demonstrably committed to either: terminating the employment of current employees according to a detailed formal plan without possibility of withdrawal; or providing termination benefits as a result of an offer made to encourage voluntary redundancy. Benefits falling due more than 12 months after the balance sheet date are discounted to present value.
Profit-sharing and bonus plans
The Group recognizes a liability and an expense for bonuses and profit-sharing, based on a formula that takes into consideration the profit that can be attributed to the parent company's shareholders after certain adjustments. The Group recognizes a provision where contractually obliged or where there is a past practice that has created a constructive obligation.
1.19 PROVISIONS
Provisions for environmental restoration measures, future waste management costs, restructuring costs and other legal requirements are recognized when: the Group has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of past events; it is more probable than not that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation; and the amount has been reliably estimated. No provision has been made for future operating losses.
If there are a number of similar obligations, the probability that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligations will be assessed overall for the entire group of obligations. A provision is reported even if the probability of an outflow for a particular item in this group of obligations is minor.
The provisions are recognized at the present value of the amount expected to be needed to settle the obligation. A discount rate before tax is used here which reflects a current market assessment of the time-dependent value of money and the risks associated with the provision. The increase in provision due to the passing of time is recorded as interest expense.
1.20 REVENUE RECOGNITION
Revenue comprises the fair value of the consideration received or receivable for goods and services sold in the Group's operating activities. Revenue is reported exclusive of value added tax, returns and discounts and after elimination of sales within the Group.
The Group recognizes revenue when its amount can be reliably measured, it is probable that the future economic benefits will flow to the company and special criteria are fulfilled for each of the Group's operations as described below. The revenue amount is not regarded as possible to measure reliably until all obligations concerning the sale have been fulfilled or otherwise extinguished. The Group bases its assessments on historical outcomes, taking into consideration the type of customer, type of transaction and special circumstances in each individual case.
The Group uses the percentage of completion method to determine the appropriate amount to recognize in a given period. The stage of completion is measured by reference to the contract costs incurred up to the balance sheet date as a percentage of total estimated costs for each contract.
The Group presents as an asset the gross amount due from customers for contract work for all contracts in progress for which costs incurred plus recognized profits exceed progress billings. Progress billings not yet paid by customers and retention are included in Trade and other receivables.
The Group presents as a liability the gross amount due to customers for contract work for all contracts in progress for which progress billings exceed costs incurred plus recognized profits.
Sales of contract services are recognized in the accounting period in which the services are rendered, by reference to completion on the balance sheet date as a proportion of the total services to be provided.
Interest income is recognized on a time-proportion basis using the effective interest method. When the value of a receivable is impaired, the Group reduces the carrying amount to the recoverable amount, which is the estimated future cash flow, discounted at the original effective interest rate for the instrument, and continues to reverse the discount effect as interest income. Interest income on impaired loans is recorded at the original effective interest rate.
Dividend income is recognized when the right to receive payment is established.
1.21 LEASES
A finance lease is a contract under which the risks and rewards incident to legal ownership are transferred by the lessor to the lessee. Leases that are not finance leases are classified as operating leases.
Assets held under finance leases are recognized as non-current assets in the Group's balance sheet at the lower of market value of the assets and the present value of future lease payments. The liability of the Group in relation to the lessor is recorded in the balance sheet under the heading Liabilities to credit institutions and is allocated between a short-term and long-term component.
The lease payments are allocated between interest and amortization of the debt. The interest is allocated over the lease term so that each accounting period is charged with an amount equivalent to a fixed interest rate on the reported debt in the respective period. The leased asset is depreciated on the same principles as applicable to other assets of the same type.
The lease payments for operating leases are expensed on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
1.22 DIVIDENDS
Dividend distribution to the parent company's shareholders is recognized as a liability in the Group's financial statements in the period in which the dividends are approved by the parent company's shareholders.
Note 2 Financial risk management
2.1 FINANCIAL RISK FACTORS
Through its operations the Group is exposed to a number of different financial risks: market risk (covering currency risk, fair value interest rate risk, cash-flow interest rate risk and price risk), credit risk and liquidity risk. The financial risks also include the company's ability to uphold financial key ratios (covenants) that regulate borrowing. The Group's overall risk management policy focuses on the unpredictability of financial markets and aims to minimize potential adverse effects on the Group's financial performance. The Group uses derivative instruments to hedge certain risk exposure.
Risk management is handled by a central treasury function in accordance with policies determined by the Board of Directors. The central function identifies, evaluates and hedges financial risk in close cooperation with the Group's operating units. The Board of Directors draws up written policies, both for overall risk management and for specific areas, such as currency risk, interest rate risk, credit risk, use of derivative and non-derivative financial instruments and investment of surplus liquidity.
Market risk
Price risk
The Group's largest single cost item is personnel, which accounts for 50 per cent of total costs. Other expenses vary. The Group's risk exposure as regards purchases is therefore of less significance.
Currency risk
The Group operates internationally and is exposed to currency risk arising from various currency exposures, above all in US dollars (USD), euros (EUR) and pounds sterling (GBP). Currency risk arises through future business transactions, reported assets and liabilities and net investment in foreign operations.
The Board of Directors has drawn up policies and guidelines for how currency risk is to be managed in the Group. To minimize the currency risk arising on business transactions and for reported assets and liabilities, the companies use different forms of currency derivatives issued by external banks. Currency risk arises when future business transactions or reported assets and liabilities are denominated in a currency that is not the functional currency of the unit.
At Group level only external foreign currency derivative contracts are classified as hedges of gross amounts of specific assets, liabilities or future transactions.
If the Swedish krona had weakened by 10 per cent against the US dollar, all other variables being constant, the year's profit as at December 31, 2008 would have been SEK 2.2 million (1.6) lower, mainly as a result of the Group's total costs in USD being somewhat higher than the corresponding income in USD. The low capacity utilization in the Erwin facility in the USA has also contributed to the losses of the US operations. Equity would have been SEK 32.3 million (29.4) higher, mainly due to translation of the Group's net investments in the USA.
If the Swedish krona had weakened by 10 per cent against the euro, all other variables being constant, the year's profit as at December 31, 2008 would have been SEK 2.5 million (3.4) higher, mainly as a result of positive net earnings in the German operations. Equity would have been SEK 9.4 million (6.8) higher, mainly due to translation of the Group's net investments in Germany.
If the Swedish krona had weakened by 10 per cent against the pound sterling, all other variables being constant, the year's profit as at December 31, 2008 would have been SEK 0.5 million (0) higher, mainly due to increased income in the UK, which also impacted segment Sweden positively. Equity would have been SEK 3.0 million (0.1) higher, as a result of translation of the Group's net investment in the UK.
Interest rate risk referring to cash flows and fair values
Since the Group does not have any material interest-bearing assets, the Group's income and cash flow from operating activities are in all essentials independent of changes in market interest rates.
The Group's interest rate risk arises through long-term borrowings. Borrowing at variable interest rates exposes the Group to cash flow interest rate risk. Borrowing at fixed interest rates exposes the Group to fair value interest rate risk. In 2008 and 2007 there were no loans at floating interest rates. The Group's contractual repricing dates for interest rates are shown in note 28.
The Group analyses its interest rate exposure regularly. Different scenarios are simulated, taking into account refinancing, renewals of existing positions, alternative funding and hedging. With these scenarios as a base, the Group calculates the impact on earnings of a given interest rate change. For each simulation the same interest rate change is used for all currencies. The scenarios are only simulated for debt constituting the largest interest-bearing positions.
Simulations carried out show that the impact on earnings of a change of 0.1 per cent would be a maximum respective increase or decrease of SEK 0.4 million.
If the interest rate on borrowings in euros on December 31, 2008 had been 0.5 per cent higher/lower, all other variables being constant, the profit after tax for the financial year would have been SEK 0.1 million (0) lower/higher, mainly as an effect of higher/lower interest expense in connection with new fixed interest borrowing. Borrowing in other currencies in 2007 and 2008 was at fixed interest rates and was not affected by interest rate changes.
Credit risk
Credit risk is managed at company and Group level. Credit risk arises through cash and cash equivalents, derivative instruments and balances at banks and financial institutions, as well as credit exposure to customers, including outstanding receivables and contractual transactions. The Group only uses banks with an AA- or higher rating for depositing cash and cash equivalents. In cases where no independent credit evaluation exists, a risk appraisal is made of the customer's creditworthiness in which financial position and prior experience and other factors are taken into consideration. Individual risk limits are set, based on internal or external credit evaluations in accordance with limits set by the Board of Directors.
The credit quality of financial assets is reported in note 19.
Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is managed through the Group holding sufficient cash and cash equivalents and short-term deposits in a liquid market, available funding through contracted credit lines and the possibility of closing market positions. Due to the dynamic character of operations, the Group retains flexibility of funding by maintaining contracts for withdrawable lines of credit.
The management also carefully follows rolling forecasts of the Group's liquidity reserve, consisting of unutilized loan assurances (note 28) and cash and cash equivalents (note 23), on the basis of expected cash flows.
The table below analyses the Group's financial liabilities and derivative instruments settled net that constitute financial liabilities, broken down by the contractual time to maturity remaining on the balance sheet date. The amounts stated in the table are the contracted, undiscounted cashflows. The amounts falling due within 12 months agree with book amounts, since the discount effect is immaterial.
| As at December 31, 2008 | Less than 1 year |
Between 1 and 2 years |
Between 2 and 5 years |
More than 5 years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bank borrowings | 37,742 | 59,631 | 225,475 65,414 | |
| Derivative financial instruments | 2,432 | 1,202 | 7 | - |
| Trade and other payables | 357,512 | 646 | 1,938 | 6,554 |
| As at December 31, 2007 | Less than 1 year |
Between 1 and 2 years |
Between 2 and 5 years |
More than 5 years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bank borrowings | 122,287 | 47,130 | 75,866 73,372 | |
| Derivative financial instruments | 158 | 41 | 11 | - |
| Trade and other payables | 301,552 | 648 | 1,944 | 5,350 |
The table below analyses the Group's financial derivative instruments that will be settled gross, broken down by the contractual time to maturity remaining on the balance sheet date. The amounts stated in the table are the contracted, undiscounted cashflows. The amounts falling due within 12 months agree with book amounts, since the discount effect is immaterial.
| As at December 31, 2008 | Less than 1 year |
Between 1 and 2 years |
Between 2 and 5 years |
More than 5 years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forward exchange contracts – cash flow hedges |
||||
| – outflow | - | - | - | - |
| – inflow | 36,903 | 12,415 | 4,388 | - |
| Between | Between | More | ||
| As at December 31, 2007 | Less than 1 year |
1 and 2 years |
2 and 5 years |
than 5 years |
| Forward exchange contracts – | ||||
| cash flow hedges | ||||
| – outflow | 3,657 | - | - | - |
2.2 CAPITAL RISK MANAGEMENT
The Group's goal for its capital structure is to safeguard the Group's ability to continue as a going concern, so that it can generate a return for its shareholders and benefit for other stakeholders and maintain an optimal capital structure as a means of controlling the cost of capital.
To retain or adjust the capital structure the Group can alter the dividend it pays to shareholders, repay capital to shareholders, issue new shares or sell assets to reduce its liabilities.
Just like other companies in the industry, the Group assesses its capital on the basis of the debt/equity ratio. This ratio is defined as net debt divided by total equity. Net debt is defined as total borrowing (including the items Short-term borrowing and Long-term borrowing in the consolidated balance sheet) less cash and cash equivalents. Equity is measured including minority interest.
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Total borrowing (note 28) | 388,262 | 318,655 |
| Less cash and cash equivalents (note 23) | –147,713 | –176,873 |
| Net debt | 240,549 | 141,782 |
| Total equity | 610,785 | 571,833 |
| Debt/equity ratio | 39% | 25% |
The change in debt/equity ratio in 2008 was mainly due to translation effects on borrowing in USD and increased borrowing related to investment in the UK operations.
2.3 FAIR VALUE ESTIMATION
The fair value of forward exchange contracts is determined using quoted forward exchange rates at the balance sheet date.
The carrying amount, after any impairment loss, for trade receivables and trade payables is assumed to be equivalent to their fair value, since these items are shortterm by nature. The fair value of financial liabilities is calculated, for information purposes, by discounting the future contracted cash flow at the current market interest rate available to the Group for similar financial instruments.
Note 3 Important accounting estimates
Estimates and assumptions are continually evaluated and rest on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events regarded as reasonable under the circumstances.
3.1 IMPORTANT ESTIMATES AND ASSUMPTIONS FOR ACCOUNTING PURPOSES
The Group makes estimates and assumptions about the future. The estimates for accounting purposes derived from these assumptions will, by definition, seldom correspond to the actual outcome. The estimates and assumptions that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year are outlined below.
Impairment tests for goodwill
Each year the Group examines whether goodwill is impaired, in accordance with the accounting policy described in note 1.7. Recoverable amounts for cash generating units have been determined by calculation of value in use. Certain estimates must be made for these calculations (note 16). When calculating value in use the same discount rate is used for all calculations, since difference in risk between different cashgenerating units in all material respects has already been taken into account when assessing cash flows.
Based on the assumptions and estimates made, there is no impairment loss on goodwill.
Income taxes
The Group is liable to pay tax in many different countries. Extensive assessments are required to establish the global provision for income tax. There are many transactions and calculations in which the final tax is uncertain at the time the transactions and calculations are made. The Group reports a liability for expected tax field audits based on assessments of whether further tax liability will arise. In cases where the final tax for these cases differs from the amounts first reported, the differences will affect current tax and provisions for deferred tax in the period when these determinations are made.
If the actual final result (in the areas where assessments have been made) were to deviate by 10 per cent from the management's assessment, the Group would be forced to:
- reduce the current tax asset by SEK 1.1 million if the outcome is unfavorable, or
- increase the deferred tax asset by SEK 1.1 million if the outcome is favorable.
Fair value of derivative instruments or other financial instruments
Fair value of financial instruments not traded on an active market is established using valuation techniques. The Group chooses several methods and makes assumptions that are mainly based on the market conditions existing on the respective balance sheet date.
Revenue recognition
The Group uses the percentage of completion method for reporting fixed price contracts. The percentage of completion method means that the Group must estimate completion of services on the balance sheet date as a proportion of the total services to be provided. If the proportion of completed services to total services to be provided deviates by 10 per cent from the management's estimate, the year's reported income would increase by SEK 3 million if the percentage of completion had increased, or decrease by SEK 3 million if the percentage of completion had decreased.
| 4 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Note 4 Segment data |
||||||||
| Financial year 2008 | Sweden | United Kingdom |
Germany | USA | Global Services |
Other | Eliminations | Group |
| Net sales | 152,287 | 148,704 | 387,872 | 317,141 | 195,988 | 128,361 | –44,402 | 1,285,951 |
| External net sales | 126,047 | 148,704 | 386,231 | 317,141 | 192,438 | 115,390 | 1,285,951 | |
| EBITDA before non-recurring items | 38,934 | –2,172 | 32,270 | 7,449 | 20,039 | –24,804 | 71,716 | |
| Depreciation/amortization and impairment | –8,240 | –3,924 | –9,004 | –35,405 | –6,985 | –3,894 | –67,452 | |
| Earnings from associated companies and joint ventures |
2,880 | 5,585 | 8,465 | |||||
| Operating profit | 30,694 | –3,216 | 23,266 | –22,371 | 13,054 | –28,698 | 0 | 12,729 |
| Net financial items | –12,033 | |||||||
| Income tax | 446 | |||||||
| Net profit | 1,142 | |||||||
| Share of equity in associated companies and | ||||||||
| joint ventures | 1,994 | 20,020 | 50 | 22,064 | ||||
| Other operating segment assets | 133,869 | 131,074 | 301,424 | 638,561 | 147,507 | 434,312 | –298,061 | 1,488,686 |
| Total assets | 1,510,750 | |||||||
| Operating segment liabilities | 78,771 | 98,652 | 211,637 | 365,328 | 120,383 | 323,255 | –298,061 | 899,965 |
| Adjusted equity | 610,785 | |||||||
| Total equity and liabilities | 1,510,750 | |||||||
| Investments | 7,756 | 38,327 | 7,808 | 26,349 | 14,427 | 13,731 | 108,398 | |
| Average number of employees | 78 | 86 | 594 | 156 | 129 | 87 | 1,130 | |
| United | Global | |||||||
| Financial year 2007 | Sweden | Kingdom | Germany | USA | Services | Other | Eliminations | Group |
| Net sales | 135,438 | 129,120 | 341,289 | 427,689 | 178,752 | 159,090 | –56,731 | 1,314,647 |
| External net sales | 104,372 | 125,771 | 339,561 | 427,689 | 167,170 | 150,084 | 1,314,647 | |
| EBITDA before non-recurring items | 33,978 | 5,420 | 30,603 | 41,703 | 22,562 | –35,201 | 99,065 | |
| Non-recurring items | 23,184 | 23,184 |
| Depreciation/amortization and impairment | –5,778 | –2,434 | –5,258 | –35,456 | –8,122 | –3,097 | –60,145 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating profit | 28,200 | 2,986 | 25,345 | 6,247 | 14,440 | –38,298 | 23,184 | 62,104 |
| Net financial items | –16,118 | |||||||
| Income tax | 1,234 | |||||||
| Net profit | 47,220 | |||||||
| Other operating segment assets | 121,080 | 89,910 | 244,369 | 624,588 | 183,293 | 389,477 | –306,761 | 1,345,956 |
| Total assets | 1,345,956 | |||||||
| Operating segment liabilities | 58,810 | 47,800 | 179,087 | 326,288 | 158,719 | 285,017 | –281,598 | 774,123 |
| Adjusted equity | 571,833 | |||||||
| Total equity and liabilities | 1,345,956 | |||||||
| Investments | 33,886 | 42,444 | 17,647 | 21,400 | 5,267 | 6,683 | 127,327 | |
| Average number of employees | 78 | 65 | 564 | 234 | 118 | 82 | 1,141 |
Note 4 Segment data
Note 4 (cont)
External net sales per product area
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Waste treatment | 495,805 | 565,296 |
| Decommissioning | 331,856 | 268,669 |
| Engineering and services | 174,742 | 163,428 |
| Operating efficiency | 195,988 | 167,170 |
| Other | 87,560 | 150,084 |
| Total | 1,285,951 | 1,314,647 |
Other operations mainly refer to the parent company and AB SVAFO. AB SVAFO is responsible for management of older state-owned research waste and decommissioning of facilities related to previous research operations. The costs of the operations are covered by the Nuclear Waste Fund.
External net sales based on the customer's country
| 2008 | 2007 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEK thousands |
Per cent | SEK thousands |
Per cent | |
| Sweden | 226,400 | 17.6 | 258,662 | 19.7 |
| Europe excl Sweden | 678,530 | 52.8 | 564,323 | 42.8 |
| North America | 369,034 | 28.7 | 463,560 | 35.3 |
| Asia | 11,975 | 0.9 | 25,853 | 2.0 |
| All other countries | 12 | 0.0 | 2,249 | 0.2 |
| Total | 1,285,951 | 100.0 | 1,314,647 | 100.0 |
At present the Group has no individual customers that account for more than 10 per cent of total sales.
Non-current assets per country
| 2008 | 2007 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEK thousands |
Per cent | SEK thousands |
Per cent | |
| Sweden | 179,016 | 17.5 | 148,265 | 17.6 |
| Europe excl Sweden | 248,047 | 24.2 | 197,380 | 23.4 |
| North America | 597,282 | 58.3 | 496,862 | 59.0 |
| Asia | 203 | 0.0 | 141 | 0.0 |
| Total | 1,024,548 | 100.0 | 842,648 | 100.0 |
Note 5 Other gains and losses – net
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Other financial instruments at fair value | ||
| through profit or loss | ||
| - fair value losses | –541 | –203 |
| - fair value gains | 1,408 | 599 |
| Forward exchange contracts | ||
| – net exchange differences | –3,238 | –1,425 |
| Total | –2,371 | –1,029 |
Note 6 Other income
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Sale of subsidiaries | - | 23,184 |
| Sale of property, plant and equipment | 770 | 733 |
| Other | 670 | 572 |
| Total | 1,440 | 24,489 |
Note 7 Costs by nature of expense
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Purchases of material and services | 510,077 | 552,063 |
| Personnel costs | 635,089 | 610,289 |
| Energy | 27,336 | 21,705 |
| Depreciation/amortization and impairment | 65,839 | 60,502 |
| Other costs | 39,649 | 31,444 |
| Total | 1,277,990 | 1,276,003 |
Note 8 Remuneration of auditors
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| PricewaterhouseCoopers | ||
| – audit assignments | 3,475 | 2,071 |
| – other assignments | 2,061 | 6,786 |
| Other auditors | ||
| – audit assignments | 175 | 192 |
| – other assignments | 69 | - |
Audit assignments refers to examination of the annual accounts, the accounting records and the administration by the Board of Directors and the President, other duties incumbent on the company's auditors, as well as advisory services and other types of support as a result of observations made through such an examination or performance of such duties. All other tasks performed by the auditors are classified as other assignments.
4 5 6 7 8
Note 9 Employee benefits
Employee benefits
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Salaries | 522,428 | 481,561 |
| Social security costs | 96,374 | 84,851 |
| Pension costs – defined contribution based | 22,871 | 25,066 |
| Pension costs – defined benefit based | 116 | 284 |
| Total | 641,789 | 591,762 |
Salaries and other remuneration by country and between Board members and Presidents as well as other employees
| 2007 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Board and President |
of which profit sharing and bonuses |
Other employees |
Board and President |
of which profit sharing and bonuses |
Other employees |
|
| Parent company | 4,787 | –110 | 8,977 | 5,033 | 110 | 6,926 |
| Subsidiaries in Sweden | 2,067 | 94 | 101,204 | 1,913 | 72 | 93,175 |
| Subsidiaries abroad | ||||||
| – Norway | - | - | 1,798 | - | - | 2,388 |
| – Germany | 1,930 | 308 | 245,417 | 1,644 | 148 | 236,378 |
| – United Kingdom | 1,788 | 84 | 50,976 | 1,399 | 108 | 27,505 |
| – USA | 3,463 | 184 | 96,954 | 3,993 | 510 | 99,451 |
| – Japan | 664 | 16 | 307 | 571 | - | 287 |
| – Switzerland | - | - | 1,208 | - | - | 898 |
| – France | - | - | 888 | - | - | - |
| Total subsidiaries | 9,912 | 686 | 498,752 | 9,520 | 838 | 460,082 |
| Total Group | 14,699 | 576 | 507,729 | 14,553 | 948 | 467,008 |
Average number of employees
| 2008 | 2007 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Men | Women | Total | Men | Women | Total | |
| Parent company | 6 | 5 | 11 | 6 | 4 | 10 |
| Subsidiaries in Sweden | 180 | 67 | 247 | 170 | 63 | 233 |
| Subsidiaries abroad | ||||||
| – Norway | 2 | - | 2 | 3 | - | 3 |
| – Germany | 520 | 68 | 588 | 499 | 68 | 567 |
| – United Kingdom | 71 | 15 | 86 | 57 | 8 | 65 |
| – USA | 161 | 22 | 183 | 232 | 28 | 260 |
| – Japan | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| – Switzerland | 1 | - | 1 | 1 | - | 1 |
| – France | 10 | - | 10 | - | - | - |
| Total subsidiaries | 946 | 173 | 1,119 | 963 | 168 | 1,131 |
| Total Group | 952 | 178 | 1,130 | 969 | 172 | 1,141 |
Gender breakdown in the Group for members of the Board and other senior management
| 2008 | 2007 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number on balance sheet date |
Of which men | Number on balance sheet date |
Of which men | ||
| Board members | 11 | 8 | 11 | 9 | |
| President and other senior management | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7 | |
| Total Group | 20 | 16 | 19 | 16 |
For information on benefits to senior management executives, see note 36.
Note 10 Financial income and expenses
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Interest income | ||
| – short-term bank balances | 5,492 | 8,293 |
| Fair value gains (realized and unrealized) | 1,923 | 255 |
| Other financial income | - | 168 |
| Financial income | 7,415 | 8,716 |
| Interest expenses | ||
| – bank loans | –17,131 | –22,207 |
| Fair value losses (realized and unrealized) | –990 | –1,173 |
| Other financial expenses | –1,327 | –1,454 |
| Financial expenses | –19,448 | –24,834 |
| Financial items – net | –12,033 | –16,118 |
Note 12 Foreign exchange differences – net
Foreign exchange differences are recognized in the income statement as follows.
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Other gains and losses – net (note 5) | –2,371 | –1,029 |
| Financial items (note 10) | 933 | –918 |
| Total | –1,438 | –1,947 |
Note 13 Earnings per share
Before dilution
Earnings per share before dilution is calculated by dividing the profit for the year by the weighted average number of shares in issue (see note 24).
| Earnings per share before dilution (SEK per share) | –0.05 | 5.65 |
|---|---|---|
| Weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue | 8,218,611 | 8,218,611 |
| Net profit for the year | –395 | 46,475 |
| 2008 | 2007 |
After dilution
Diluted earnings per share is calculated by adjusting the weighted average number of shares in issue to assume conversion of all dilutive potential shares. There were no unconverted share options or convertible debt instruments in issue on the balance sheet date.
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Net profit for the year | –395 | 46,475 |
| Weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue | 8,218,611 | 8,218,611 |
| Earnings per share after dilution (SEK per share) | –0.05 | 5.65 |
Note 14 Dividend per share
Dividends paid in 2008 and 2007 amounted to SEK 16,437 thousand (SEK 2 per share) and SEK 16,437 thousand (SEK 2 per share). At the Annual General Meeting on April 22, 2009 a dividend for the 2008 financial year of SEK 1 per share, a total of SEK 8,219 thousand, will be proposed. The proposed dividend has not been recognized as a liability in these financial statements.
Note 11 Income tax
| Total | 446 | 1,234 |
|---|---|---|
| Current tax | –9,718 | –10,085 |
| Deferred tax | 10,164 | 11,319 |
| 2008 | 2007 |
The Swedish tax rate is 28 (28) per cent. The income tax on the Group's profit before tax differs from the theoretical amount that would arise using the weighted average tax rate for profits of the consolidated companies as follows.
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Profit before tax | 696 | 45,987 |
| Tax in accordance with the current tax rate | –196 | –12,876 |
| Non-taxable revenue | 86 | 10,053 |
| Expenses not deductible for tax purposes | –1,327 | –983 |
| Deferred tax asset referring to pensions | 1,024 | 328 |
| Adjustment for foreign tax rate | 74 | –2,733 |
| Adjustment for previous years' tax assessment | 1,556 | 3,089 |
| Other effects | –771 | 4,356 |
| Tax expense | 446 | 1,234 |
Weighted average tax rate was –64 (–3) per cent. The main reasons for the difference in tax rate between Swedish income tax and the weighted average tax rate are mainly explained by previously unrecognized deferred tax assets in Sweden and adjustment of the previous year's tax expenses in the United Kingdom, Germany and Sweden.
Note 15 Property, plant and equipment
| Construction in progress and advance payments |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land and buildings |
Plant and machinery |
Equipment and tools |
for property, plant and equipment |
Total | |
| As at January 1, 2007 | |||||
| Cost of acquisition | 160,183 | 357,600 | 252,984 | 38,283 | 809,050 |
| Accumulated depreciation and impairment | –73,503 | –182,672 | –152,228 | - | –408,403 |
| Book value | 86,680 | 174,928 | 100,756 | 38,283 | 400,647 |
| January 1 - December 31, 2007 | |||||
| Opening book value | 86,680 | 174,928 | 100,756 | 38,283 | 400,647 |
| Foreign exchange differences | –2,453 | –8,810 | –4,581 | –834 | –16,678 |
| Acquisition of subsidiaries | - | - | 401 | - | 401 |
| Subsidiaries sold | –1,549 | –236 | –461 | - | –2,246 |
| Investments | 3,714 | 6,124 | 15,784 | 54,890 | 80,512 |
| Redistribution during the year | 29,818 | 13,826 | 4,726 | –51,132 | –2,762 |
| Disposals and retirements | –491 | –95 | –669 | –483 | –1,738 |
| Depreciation/write-down | –3,850 | –25,968 | –21,724 | - | –51,542 |
| Closing book value | 111,869 | 159,769 | 94,232 | 40,724 | 406,594 |
| As at December 31, 2007 | |||||
| Cost of acquisition | 188,307 | 350,764 | 257,732 | 40,724 | 837,527 |
| Accumulated depreciation and impairment | –76,438 | –190,995 | –163,500 | - | –430,933 |
| Book value | 111,869 | 159,769 | 94,232 | 40,724 | 406,594 |
| January 1 - December 31, 2008 | |||||
| Opening book value | 111,869 | 159,769 | 94,232 | 40,724 | 406,594 |
| Foreign exchange differences | 4,350 | 22,996 | 12,375 | 3,250 | 42,971 |
| Acquisition of subsidiaries | - | - | 3 | - | 3 |
| Investments | 2,721 | 4,597 | 13,052 | 75,158 | 95,528 |
| Redistribution during the year | 15,862 | 37,914 | 5,998 | –40,023 | 19,751 |
| Disposals and retirements | –806 | –827 | –392 | –2,710 | –4,735 |
| Depreciation/write-down | –5,428 | –26,561 | –24,161 | - | –56,150 |
| Impairment losses for the year | - | - | –222 | - | –222 |
| Closing book value | 128,568 | 197,888 | 100,885 | 76,399 | 503,740 |
| As at December 31, 2008 | |||||
| Cost of acquisition | 212,084 | 445,749 | 308,075 | 76,399 | 1,042,307 |
| Accumulated depreciation and impairment | –83,516 | –247,861 | –207,190 | - | –538,567 |
| Book value | 128,568 | 197,888 | 100,885 | 76,399 | 503,740 |
Depreciation costs include SEK 51,400 thousand for cost of goods sold, SEK 281 thousand for selling and marketing costs, SEK 3,952 thousand for administrative expenses and SEK 517 thousand in research and development costs. Interest of SEK 2,441 thousand (-) is included in the cost of acquisition of buildings, plant and machinery. The assessed value of buildings is SEK 29,888 thousand and of land SEK 26,202 thousand.
Note 16 Intangible assets
| Goodwill | Software rights |
Renting and similar rights |
Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| As at January 1, 2007 | ||||
| Cost of acquisition | 310,129 | 21,698 | 53,110 | 384,937 |
| Accumulated amortization and | ||||
| impairment | –5,386 | –19,045 | –4,932 | –29,363 |
| Book value | 304,743 | 2,653 | 48,178 | 355,574 |
| January 1 - December 31, 2007 | ||||
| Opening book value | 304,743 | 2,653 | 48,178 | 355,574 |
| Foreign exchange differences | –2,503 | 1 | –2,430 | –4,932 |
| Acquisition of subsidiaries | 28,959 | 11,827 | 40,786 | |
| Subsidiaries sold | –11,250 | –11,250 | ||
| Adjustment of cost of acquisition | –2,857 | –2,857 | ||
| Redistributions | –5,386 | 10 | 5,376 | 0 |
| Amortization | –2,186 | –6,417 | –8,603 | |
| Closing book value | 311,706 | 478 | 56,534 | 368,718 |
| As at December 31, 2007 | ||||
| Cost of acquisition | 317,092 | 21,732 | 67,067 | 405,891 |
| Accumulated amortization and | ||||
| impairment | –5,386 | –21,254 | –10,533 | –37,173 |
| Book value | 311,706 | 478 | 56,534 | 368,718 |
| January 1 - December 31, 2008 | ||||
| Opening book value | 311,706 | 478 | 56,534 | 368,718 |
| Foreign exchange differences | 47,241 | –1 | 7,807 | 55,047 |
| Acquisition of subsidiaries | 3,455 | 917 | 4,372 | |
| Adjustment of cost of acquisition | 605 | 605 | ||
| Investments | 1,217 | 479 | 1,696 | |
| Redistributions | 87 | –87 | 0 | |
| Amortization/write-down | –538 | –10,509 | –11,047 | |
| Impairment losses for the year | –33 | –33 | ||
| Closing book value | 363,007 | 1,210 | 55,141 | 419,358 |
| As at December 31, 2008 | ||||
| Cost of acquisition | 368,393 | 22,970 | 78,639 | 470,002 |
| Accumulated amortization and | ||||
| impairment | –5,386 | –21,760 | –23,498 | –50,644 |
| Book value | 363,007 | 1,210 | 55,141 | 419,358 |
Note 17 Investments in associated companies
2008 2007 Opening balance - - Share in earnings 8,465 - Dividend received from associated companies –744 - Transferred from other financial assets 13,475 - Share received through acquisition of subsidiary 50 - Foreign exchange differences 818 - Closing balance 22,064 -
The Group's share in earnings of the most important associated companies, which are all unlisted, and its share of assets (including goodwill and liabilities) is as follows.
| 2007 | Assets | Liabilities | Income | Profit/loss | Participating interest % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| THOR Treatment Technologies, LLC | USA | 27,715 | 13,521 | 76,262 | 2,935 | 50 |
| UK Nuclear Waste Management Ltd | UK | - | - | - | - | 15 |
| Total | 27,715 | 13,521 | 76,262 | 2,935 | ||
| 2008 | Assets | Liabilities | Income | Profit/loss | Participating interest % | |
| THOR Treatment Technologies, LLC | USA | 31,318 | 11,296 | 76,543 | 3,052 | 50 |
| UK Nuclear Waste Management Ltd | UK | 5,724 | 5,584 | 7,965 | 0 | 15 |
| KraftAkademin AB | Sweden | 68 | 12 | 145 | 3 | 20 |
| Total | 37,110 | 16,892 | 84,653 | 3,055 |
THOR Treatment Technologies, LLC, is a joint venture where Studsvik is a co-owner under a cooperation agreement on joint control. TTT conducts waste treatment operations on the US federal waste market. The Group has no contingent liabilities referring to the holding in TTT.
UK Nuclear Waste Management Ltd is a joint venture where Studsvik is one of four partners. Studsvik has a significant influence through board representation and knowledge transfer. NWM has been appointed to be responsible, together with the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA), for management and operation of a final repository and to implement a well-functioning strategy for management of low level radioactive waste in the UK.
KraftAkademin AB produces and conducts training for the nuclear power industry. The business concept is based on giving customers the opportunity of supplementing their internal training activities with courses and seminars when implementing individual competence development plans. Studsvik contributes competence in thermo hydraulics, reactor dynamics and health physics to KraftAkademin's operations.
Note 16 (cont)
Other intangible assets mainly consist of customer relations/contracts. Amortization of SEK 11,047 thousand (8,603) is included in cost of services sold in the income statement.
Impairment tests for goodwill
Goodwill is allocated to the Group's cash generating units (CGUs) identified by segment. A segment level summary of the goodwill allocation is presented below.
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | - | - |
| United Kingdom | 24,226 | 27,143 |
| Germany | 130,800 | 113,504 |
| USA | 205,150 | 171,059 |
| Global Services | 2,831 | - |
| Other | - | - |
| Total | 363,007 | 311,706 |
Goodwill is tested annually to identify any impairment loss. The calculation is carried out for each respective CGU and is based on estimated future cash flows according to historical trends and business plans for the next three years. Cash flows beyond the three year period are extrapolated with an appraised annual rate of growth. For each CGU a recoverable amount is determined as a present value of estimated future payment flows. The recoverable amount for the Group's CGUs is determined on the basis of value in use calculations. The discount rate used is a weighted cost of capital calculated for the Group, consisting of the cost of borrowed capital and the cost of equity.
The cost of borrowed capital is calculated on the basis of an estimated average interest rate for the Group's loan portfolio. The cost of equity is calculated as the return on risk-free investments plus a risk premium that is estimated to reflect investors' requirements of listed companies in Studsvik's industry sector. The weighted cost of capital used in calculating the recoverable amount is 9 (8) per cent before tax. Based on the assumptions and estimates made, there is no impairment loss on goodwill.
Note 18 Financial instruments by category
Accounting policies for financial instruments have been applied to the items below.
| Loans and receivables |
Assets at fair value through profit or loss |
Derivatives used for hedging |
Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| As at December 31, 2008 | ||||
| Assets in the balance sheet | ||||
| Derivative financial instruments | 146 | 425 | 571 | |
| Trade and other receivables | 309,156 | 15,344 | 324,500 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 147,713 | 147,713 | ||
| Total | 456,869 | 15,490 | 425 | 472,784 |
| Liabilities at fair value through profit or loss |
Derivatives for hedging |
Other financial liabilities |
Total | |
| Liabilities in the balance sheet | ||||
| Borrowings | 388,262 | 388,262 | ||
| Derivative financial instruments | 2,754 | 887 | 3,641 | |
| Total | 2,754 | 887 | 388,262 | 391,903 |
| Loans and receivables |
Assets at fair value through profit or loss |
Derivatives used for hedging |
Total | |
| As at December 31, 2007 | ||||
| Assets in the balance sheet | ||||
| Derivative financial instruments | 1,289 | 1,289 | ||
| Trade and other receivables | 313,667 | 14,748 | 328,415 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 176,873 | 176,873 | ||
| Total | 490,540 | 16,037 | - | 506,577 |
| Liabilities at fair value through profit or loss |
Derivatives for hedging |
Other financial liabilities |
Total | |
| Liabilities in the balance sheet | ||||
| Borrowings | 318,655 | 318,655 | ||
| Derivative financial instruments | 210 | 210 | ||
| Total | 210 | - | 318,655 | 318,865 |
Note 19 Credit quality of the financial assets
The credit quality of the financial assets can be assessed by referring to external credit ratings (if available) or to the counterparty's payment history.
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Trade receivables | ||
| Counterparties without external credit rating | ||
| – new customers (less than 6 months) | 11,389 | 2,160 |
| – existing customers with no defaults in the past | 147,456 | 130,897 |
| – existing customers with some delayed payments in the past | 42,903 | 72,914 |
| Total | 201,748 | 205,971 |
| Bank balances and short-term borrowing | ||
| AA | 147,713 | 176,873 |
| Total | 147,713 | 176,873 |
| Derivative financial instruments | ||
| AA | 571 | 1,289 |
| Total | 571 | 1,289 |
None of the fully performing financial assets has been renegotiated in the last year.
Note 20 Derivative financial instruments
| 2008 | 2007 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assets | Liabilities | Assets | Liabilities | |
| Forward exchange contracts | 571 | 3,641 | 1,289 | 210 |
Revaluation of forward exchange contracts designated as hedges is through equity. Other forward contracts are revalued through profit or loss.
Outstanding forward exchange contracts, December 31, 2008
| INFLOW CURRENCIES | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR | GBP | JPY | USD | ||
| Maturity year | 000 | 000 | 000 | 000 | |
| 2009 | Amount | 854 | 259 | 23,970 | 3,184 |
| Rate 1) | 10.087 | 11.835 | 0.068 | 7.408 | |
| 2010 | Amount | 98 | 39,970 | 1,178 | |
| Rate 1) | 10.132 | 0.069 | 7.369 | ||
| 2011 | Amount | 273 | |||
| Rate 1) | 7.719 | ||||
| 2012 | Amount | 297 | |||
| Rate 1) | 7.680 | ||||
| Remeasured at fair value, SEK | 9,607 | 3,065 | 4,388 | 36,656 |
1) Average contractual rate
The nominal amount for outstanding forward exchange contracts is SEK 56,737 thousand.
Note 21 Trade and other receivables
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Trade receivables | 211,032 | 213,554 |
| Less – provision for impairment of receivables | –9,284 | –7,583 |
| Trade receivables – net | 201,748 | 205,971 |
| Shares in other companies | 5,558 | 5,645 |
| Other securities | 9,786 | 9,103 |
| Work in progress | 20,553 | 16,741 |
| Tax assets | 6,972 | 24,022 |
| Other receivables | 25,316 | 35,465 |
| Prepaid expenses and accrued income | ||
| – accrued income | 31,853 | 16,857 |
| – accrued interest income | 9 | 225 |
| – prepaid rent | 1,768 | 746 |
| – prepaid lease charges | 61 | 177 |
| – prepaid insurance premiums | 7,368 | 5,299 |
| – other prepaid expenses | 13,508 | 8,164 |
| Total | 324,500 | 328,415 |
| Non-current portion | 15,344 | 25,372 |
| Current portion | 309,156 | 303,043 |
| Total | 324,500 | 328,415 |
Carrying amounts of the Group's trade and other receivables by currency are as follows.
Note 21 (cont)
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| SEK | 89,629 | 87,920 |
| EUR | 76,791 | 66,175 |
| GBP | 91,223 | 37,362 |
| USD | 49,931 | 107,909 |
| Other currencies | 1,582 | 3,677 |
| Total | 309,156 | 303,043 |
Changes in the reserve for doubtful receivables are as follows.
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| As at January 1, 2008 | –7,583 | –863 |
| Translation difference | –1,441 | - |
| Provision for doubtful receivables | –333 | –7,200 |
| Receivables written off as unrecoverable | 73 | –593 |
| Unused amounts reversed | - | 802 |
| Sale of subsidiaries | - | 271 |
| As at December 31, 2008 | –9,284 | –7,583 |
Transfers to and reversals from reserves for doubtful receivables are included in the item other costs in the income statement. Amounts stated in the depreciation account are normally written off when the Group is not expected to recover further cash funds. No impairment loss has been identified for any assets in other categories of trade and other receivables. There is no concentration of credit risk with respect to trade receivables, as the Group has a large number of customers, internationally dispersed.
Note 22 Inventories
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Raw material | 4,891 | 5,096 |
| Work in progress | 22,159 | 15,820 |
| Finished goods | 1,767 | 1,543 |
| Total | 28,817 | 22,459 |
The expensed expenditure for inventories is included under Cost of services sold and amounts to SEK 30,510 thousand (19,339).
Note 23 Cash and cash equivalents
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash and bank balances | 147,713 | 176,873 |
| Total | 147,713 | 176,873 |
Note 24 Share capital and other contributed capital
| Other contributed | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of shares | Share capital | capital | |
| As at January 1, 2007 | 8,218,611 | 8,219 | 225,959 |
| As at December 31, 2007 | 8,218,611 | 8,219 | 225,959 |
| As at January 1, 2008 | 8,218,611 | 8,219 | 225,959 |
| Transfers within equity | - | - | –687 |
| As at December 31, 2008 | 8,218,611 | 8,219 | 225,272 |
All shares are ordinary shares with a quotient value of 1.0.
Trade and other receivables are recognized at fair value. No impairment loss is considered to exist for trade receivables less than 3 months overdue. As at December 31, 2008 trade receivables of SEK 84,573 thousand (68,349) were overdue without any impairment loss being identified. These refer to a number of independent customers who have had no payment difficulties in the past. The age analysis of these trade receivables is given below.
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Less than 3 months | 71,207 | 40,668 |
| 3 to 6 months | 3,662 | 24,546 |
| More than 6 months | 9,704 | 3,135 |
| Total | 84,573 | 68,349 |
25 26 27 28
Note 25 Retained earnings
| As at December 31, 2008 | 327,985 |
|---|---|
| Transfers within equity | 687 |
| Dividend paid for 2007 | –16,437 |
| Net profit for the year | –395 |
| As at January 1, 2008 | 344,130 |
| As at December 31, 2007 | 344,130 |
| Transfer of earnings to minority | –2,442 |
| Dividend paid for 2006 | –16,437 |
| Net profit for the year | 46,475 |
| As at January 1, 2007 | 316,534 |
Note 26 Other reserves
| Currency translation reserve |
Hedge reserve |
Total reserves |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| As at January 1, 2007 | 7,653 | - | 7,653 |
| Foreign exchange differences | –17,585 | - | –17,585 |
| As at December 31, 2007 | –9,932 | - | –9,932 |
| As at January 1, 2008 | –9,932 | –9,932 | |
| Foreign exchange differences | 59,262 | 59,262 | |
| Cash flow hedges | |||
| – fair value differences | –462 | –462 | |
| – tax on fair value differences | 121 | 121 | |
| As at December 31, 2008 | 49,330 | –341 | 48,989 |
Note 27 Trade and other payables
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Trade payables | 97,387 | 63,333 |
| Liabilities for work in progress | 29,425 | 35,292 |
| Advance payments from customers | 32,605 | 37,716 |
| Social security and other taxes | 54,508 | 29,490 |
| Other liabilities | 16,432 | 9,218 |
| Accrued expenses and deferred income | ||
| – deferred income | 19,947 | 17,425 |
| – accrued interest expense | 1,836 | 312 |
| – accrued salaries | 31,280 | 50,291 |
| – accrued pension costs | 9,138 | 10,574 |
| – accrued tax expense | - | 769 |
| – other items | 74,092 | 55,074 |
| Total | 366,650 | 309,494 |
| Non-current portion | 9,138 | 7,942 |
| Current portion | 357,512 | 301,552 |
| Total | 366,650 | 309,494 |
Note 28 Borrowings
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Non-current portion | 350,520 | 196,368 |
| Current portion | 37,742 | 122,287 |
| Total | 388,262 | 318,655 |
Shares in Studsvik GmbH and Studsvik Verwaltungs GmbH have been put up as collateral for the Group's bank borrowings. The Group's borrowings are recognized at fair value.
The exposure of the Group's borrowings to interest rate changes and the contractual repricing dates at the balance sheet date are as follows
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| 6–12 months | 388,262 | 137,113 |
| 1–5 years | - | 181,542 |
| Total | 388,262 | 318,655 |
The bank loans mature on to 2017. Total borrowing includes bank loans and other borrowing against collateral of SEK 99,099 thousand (94,169). The collateral for bank loans is the Group's shares in subsidiaries.
Maturities of borrowings
rencies
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Less than 1 year | 71,225 | 122,287 |
| Between 1 and 2 years | 66,794 | 47,130 |
| Between 2 and 5 years | 236,803 | 75,866 |
| More than 5 years | 13,440 | 73,372 |
| Total | 388,262 | 318,655 |
The carrying amounts of the Group's borrowings are denominated in the following cur-
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| EUR | 99,480 | 94,169 |
| USD | 219,342 | 209,042 |
| GBP | 69,440 | 15,444 |
| Total | 388,262 | 318,655 |
The Group has the following unutilized credit facilities
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Variable interest rate | ||
| – matures within one year | 31,882 | 27,034 |
| – matures after more than one year | 4,950 | 5,580 |
| Total | 36,832 | 32,614 |
The lines of credit that mature within one year are one-year credit facilities that are reviewed periodically. This review is done anually during December.
Average effective interest rate on balance sheet date, bank borrowings
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| EUR | 4.45% | 4.30% |
| USD | 4.54% | 5.74% |
| GBP | 7.24% | 6.89% |
Note 29 Deferred tax
Deferred tax assets and tax liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax assets against current tax liabilities and when the deferred tax refers to the same tax authority. The amounts offset are as follows:
| Offset amounts | 2008 | 2007 |
|---|---|---|
| Deferred tax assets | ||
| Deferred tax assets to be utilized after more than 12 months | 49,434 | 36,160 |
| Deferred tax assets to be utilized within 12 months | 14,553 | 5,448 |
| Total | 63,987 | 41,608 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | ||
| Deferred tax liabilities to be paid after more than 12 months | 31,780 | 38,391 |
| Deferred tax liabilities to be paid within 12 months | 2,549 | 2,498 |
| Total | 34,329 | 40,889 |
Changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities during the year, without taking into account offsets made in the same fiscal jurisdiction are shown below:
| Deferred tax assets | Tax losses | Other | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| As at January 1, 2007 | 41,317 | 3,085 | 44,402 |
| Recognized in the income statement | 2,397 | –2,792 | –395 |
| Change through sale of subsidiaries | –145 | –145 | |
| Translation differences | –2,254 | –2,254 | |
| As at December 31, 2007 | 41,460 | 148 | 41,608 |
| Recognized in the income statement | 12,271 | 1,693 | 13,964 |
| Reclassification | 1,550 | 1,550 | |
| Recognized in equity | 121 | 121 | |
| Translation differences | 6,744 | 6,744 | |
| As at December 31, 2008 | 60,475 | 3,512 | 63,987 |
| Accelerated | ||
|---|---|---|
| tax depreciation | Other | Total |
| 5,503 | 38,884 | 44,387 |
| –72 | –6,961 | –7,033 |
| 3,741 | 3,741 | |
| –206 | –206 | |
| 5,431 | 35,458 | 40,889 |
| 1,124 | 1,406 | 2,530 |
| –14,488 | –14,488 | |
| 458 | 458 | |
| 4,940 | 4,940 | |
| 6,555 | 27,774 | 34,329 |
Deferred tax assets are recognized for tax loss carry forwards to the extent that the realization of the related tax benefit through the future taxable profits is probable. Most of the Group's tax loss carry forwards are related to the US operations. These total USD 42.8 million, to be utilized within a 20 year period. The Group's recognized deferred tax assets include tax loss carry forwards in the USA of SEK 56.1 million (36.2).
Note 30 Pension obligations
Defined benefit pension plans
There are a few defined benefit pension plans within the Group, which are primarily based on final salary. The plans that have been considered to be material are in Germany. A reclassification has been made for a defined benefit pension plan in Sweden. From 2005 the pension plan is a defined contribution plan. Other pension obligations have not been considered as having any material effect, and have therefore not been restated in accordance with IAS 19.
Pension insurance with Alecta
Commitments for old-age pension and family pension for employees in Sweden are safeguarded through insurance with Alecta. According to a statement by the Swedish Financial Accounting Standards Council's Emerging Issues Task Force, URA 42, this is a defined benefit plan covering several employers. For the 2008 financial year the Group has not had access to such information as will make it possible to report this plan as a defined benefit plan. Consequently, the pension plan, under ITP, which is safeguarded through insurance with Alecta, is reported as a defined contribution plan. The year's contributions for pension insurance taken out with Alecta amount to SEK 3,846 thousand (6,970). Alecta's surplus can be distributed to the policy holders and/or the insured. At the end of 2008 Alecta's surplus in the form of a collective solvency level was 126 (164) per cent. The collective solvency level comprises the market value of Alecta's assets as a percentage of its insurance commitments calculated in accordance with Alecta's actuarial assumptions, which do not comply with IAS 19.
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Obligations in the balance sheet for | ||
| Pension benefits | 7,790 | 5,961 |
| Income statement charge for (note 9) | ||
| Pension costs | 22,987 | 25,350 |
Amounts recognized in the balance sheet
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Present value of unfunded obligations | 7,790 | 5,961 |
| Total | 7,790 | 5,961 |
Amounts recognized in the income statement
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Defined benefit plans | ||
| Current service cost | 328 | 142 |
| Interest expense | 58 | 142 |
| Total | 386 | 284 |
Of the total cost, SEK 76 thousand (28) was included in Cost of services sold and SEK 310 thousand (256) in Administrative expenses. The actual return on the plan assets was SEK - thousand (-).
The movement in the liability recognized in the consolidated balance sheet
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| At the beginning of the year | 5,961 | 5,939 |
| Translation differences | 1,476 | –109 |
| Total expense recognized in the income statement | 386 | 284 |
| Contributions paid | –33 | –153 |
| At the end of the year | 7,790 | 5,961 |
Total pension costs recognized in the consolidated income statement
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Total costs for defined benefit plans | 386 | 284 |
| Total costs for defined contribution plans Costs of special employer's contribution and tax on |
19,214 | 21,467 |
| returns from pension funds | 3,387 | 3,599 |
| Total | 22,987 | 25,350 |
Actuarial assumptions
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Discount rate | 5.6% | 5.3% |
| Expected return on plan assets | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Future salary increases | 3.0% | 3.0% |
| Future pension increases | 2.2% | 1.9% |
Note 31 Other provisions
| Future waste ma nagement expenses |
Restruc turing |
Other provisions |
Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| As at January 1, 2008 | 53,137 | 11,217 | 23,058 | 87,412 |
| Recognized as an expense in the consolidated income statement |
||||
| - additional provisions | 18,691 | 1,279 | 19,970 | |
| Foreign exchange differences | –1,419 | –1,419 | ||
| Effects of changed conditions for | ||||
| discounting | 1,388 | 3,927 | 5,315 | |
| Amount utilized during the period | –18,336 | –3,637 | –21,973 | |
| Translation difference | 4,344 | 4,344 | ||
| As at December 31, 2008 | 53,461 | 7,580 | 32,608 | 93,649 |
| Non-current portion | 52,721 | 31,755 | 84,476 | |
| Current portion | 740 | 7,580 | 853 | 9,173 |
| Total | 53,461 | 7,580 | 32,608 | 93,649 |
Future waste management expenses
The Group's operations generate nuclear waste and radioactive waste which must be sent for final disposal within the framework of the systems and rules in force in the countries in which Studsvik carries on operations in its own production facilities. Provisions are made for operational waste, spent reactor fuel and also to some extent for decommissioning of facilities and the resulting decommissioning waste. The main part of the costs of decommissioning and decommissioning waste from the Group's Swedish nuclear facilities is financed, under the provisions of the Act 1988:1597. The Swedish nuclear power producers are liable to pay this charge. Fees paid in are administered by the Nuclear Waste Fund.
Funds for decommissioning and waste management may be withdrawn from the Fund by Studsvik, which holds the nuclear permit for the facilities in question. Studsvik is not liable to pay under the current Act. Studsvik's responsibility for decommissioning and waste management for its own nuclear facilities is limited to buildings, systems and components coming into existence after June 30, 1991. Studsvik estimates these commitments on a current basis and provision is made for them. The provision stated in the accounts includes waste management and decommissioning of facilities of SEK 53.5 million. Of the total provisions it is expected that SEK 0.7 million will be utilized in 2009, SEK 25.3 million starting no earlier than in 10 years and the rest is expected to be utilized only when operations are discontinued and the facility dismantled.Additional provisions in 2008 mainly refer to future decommissioning costs for newly built waste treatment facilities in Sweden.
Restructuring
In December 2004 the Board of Directors of Studsvik AB decided that the Group's reactor operations would cease in 2005. Operations ceased in June 2005 after which restructuring of the business was started. This is expected to be fully completed in 2009.
Other provisions
Other provisions mainly refer to future costs for decommissioning the American waste management facilities.
Note 32 Cash flow from operating activities
Non-cash items
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Depreciation/amortization and impairment | 67,452 | 60,145 |
| Results from sale of property, plant and equipment | –2,124 | –733 |
| Results from sale of subsidiaries | - | –23,184 |
| Share in earnings from associated companies | –8,465 | - |
| Change in provisions | 4,079 | 1,276 |
| Total | 60,942 | 37,504 |
Note 33 Contingent liabilities
The Group has contingent liabilities in respect of bank guarantees and other guarantees as well as other items arising in the normal course of business. No material liabilities are expected to arise through these contingent liabilities. In the normal course of business the Group has issued guarantees amounting to SEK 63,290 thousand (93,257) to third parties. No further payments are expected as at the date of these financial reports.
Note 34 Commitments
INVESTMENT COMMITMENTS
Capital expenditure contracted for at the balance sheet date but not yet recognized in the financial reports is as follows.
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Property, plant and equipment | 17,424 | 9,309 |
| Total | 17,424 | 9,309 |
OPERATIONAL LEASE COMMITMENTS
Lease expenses for operational leases for the year amounted to SEK 23,591 thousand (7,646).
Future aggregate minimum lease fees
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Within 1 year | 13,733 | 5,240 |
| Between 1 and 5 years | 19,211 | 13,416 |
| More than 5 years | 3,819 | - |
| Total | 36,763 | 18,656 |
FINANCE LEASE COMMITMENTS
Assets activated as financial lease
| Equipment and tools |
|
|---|---|
| Opening book value January 1, 2007 | 12,221 |
| Depreciation for the year | –3,978 |
| Closing book value December 31, 2007 | 8,243 |
| Opening book value January 1, 2008 | 8,243 |
| Depreciation for the year | –2,904 |
| Translation differences | 1,114 |
| Closing book value December 31, 2008 | 6,453 |
Future aggregate minimum lease payments
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Within 1 year | 303 | 3,123 |
| Between 1 and 5 years | 8,217 | 5,397 |
| Total | 8,520 | 8,520 |
Lease expenses for financial leasing for the year amounted to SEK 64 thousand (721). The Group's financial leasing mainly consist of lease contracts for transport vehicles in the USA.
Note 35 Business combinations
On October 13, 2008 Studsvik Nuclear AB acquired 100 per cent of the shares in ALARA Holding i Skultuna AB and its wholly owned subsidiary ALARA Engineering AB, operating in Sweden. ALARA conducts consulting operations in the nuclear power field with customers in Sweden and Finland.
On December 18, 2008 Studsvik, Inc. acquired the remaining 10 per cent of the shares in the Studsvik Processing Facility Erwin, LLC in Erwin, Tennessee, USA. The Studsvik Processing Facility Erwin (SPFE) treats wet low and intermediate level waste from nuclear power plants using Studsvik's patented pyrolysis technology. The company is reported as a subsidiary. The purchase price for the remaining 10 per cent of the shares was USD 750 thousand.
The acquired operations in ALARA contributed net sales of SEK 2,348 thousand and an operating profit of SEK 71 thousand for the period from October 13 up to and including December 31, 2008. If the acquisition had taken place on January 1, the Group's net sales would have been SEK 1,289,580 thousand and the operating profit for the year SEK 13,236 thousand. These amounts have been calculated in accordance with the Group's accounting policies, adjusting the subsidiary's earnings to include additional depreciation/amortization that would have taken place if fair value adjustments to property, plant and equipment and intangible assets had been made as at January 1, 2008.
Information on acquired net assets and goodwill
| ALARA | SPFE | |
|---|---|---|
| Purchase price paid to seller | 4,828 | 5,775 |
| Direct costs in connection with acquisition | 109 | 461 |
| Total purchase price | 4,937 | 6,236 |
| Fair value of net assets acquired | –2,106 | –5,612 |
| Goodwill | 2,831 | 624 |
Goodwill is attributable to the market position and synergy effects expected to arise on integration with Studsvik's other similar operations.
Assets and liabilities as a consequence of the acquisitions
| ALARA | SPFE | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acquired carrying |
Acquired carrying |
|||
| Fair value | amount Fair value | amount | ||
| Intangible assets | 917 | - | ||
| Property, plant and equipment | 3 | 3 | ||
| Non-current financial assets | 50 | 50 | ||
| Trade and other receivables | 1,385 | 1,385 | ||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 1,279 | 1,279 | ||
| Total | 3,634 | 2,717 | - | - |
| Minority share | –5,612 | –5,612 | ||
| Trade payables | 11 | 11 | ||
| Other current liabilities | 1,059 | 1,059 | ||
| Deferred taxes | 458 | 201 | ||
| Total | 1,528 | 1,271 | –5,612 | –5,612 |
| Net assets acquired | 2,106 | 1,446 | 5,612 | 5,612 |
| Cash flow from acquisition of subsidiaries | ||||
| Purchase price paid | 11,173 | |||
| Financial liability to sellers | –3,849 | |||
| Cash and cash equivalents in acquired | ||||
| subsidiaries | –1,279 |
Change in the Group's cash and cash equivalents on acquisition 6,045
Note 36 Information on the Board of Directors and senior management
| Salaries and other benefits, 2008 | Basic salary/ Board fee |
Committee fee | Variable remuneration |
Other benefits |
Pension cost | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chairman of the Board | ||||||
| – Anders Ullberg | 625 | 25 | 650 | |||
| Members of the board (6) | ||||||
| – Jan Barchan | 212 | 212 | ||||
| – Ingemar Eliasson | 212 | 50 | 262 | |||
| – Lars Engström | 112 | 112 | ||||
| – Anna Karinen | 350 | 350 | ||||
| – Alf Lindfors | 212 | 212 | ||||
| – Per Ludvigsson | 212 | 25 | 237 | |||
| – Leif Nilsson *) | 100 | 100 | ||||
| Employee representatives (4) | 22 | 22 | ||||
| President | 2,692 | 148 | 799 | 3,639 | ||
| Other senior management (8) | 11,025 | 661 | 550 | 2,575 | 14,811 | |
| Total | 15,774 | 100 | 661 | 698 | 3,374 | 20,607 |
*) Member of the Board until April 22, 2008.
| Salaries and other benefits, 2007 | Basic salary/ Board fee |
Committee fee | Variable remuneration |
Other benefits |
Pension cost | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chairman of the Board | ||||||
| – Anders Ullberg | 300 | 300 | ||||
| – Per Wahlström *) | 275 | 275 | ||||
| Members of the board (6) | ||||||
| – Jan Barchan | 200 | 200 | ||||
| – Ingemar Eliasson | 200 | 200 | ||||
| – Håkan Johansson **) | 150 | 150 | ||||
| – Anna Karinen | 275 | 275 | ||||
| – Alf Lindfors | 200 | 200 | ||||
| – Per Ludvigsson | 100 | 100 | ||||
| – Leif Nilsson | 200 | 200 | ||||
| – Henry Sténson **) | 100 | 100 | ||||
| Employee representatives (4) | 112 | 112 | ||||
| President | 2,679 | 127 | 121 | 858 | 3,785 | |
| Other senior management (7) | 9,273 | 330 | 538 | 2,088 | 12,229 | |
| of whom outgoing (1) | 470 | 470 | ||||
| Total | 14,064 | - | 457 | 659 | 2,946 | 18,126 |
*) Chairman of the Board until April 19, 2007.**) Member of the Board until April 19, 2007.
| Remuneration to the Board of Directors | ||
|---|---|---|
| and senior management | 2008 | 2007 |
| Parent company | ||
| Salaries and other remuneration | 8,802 | 8,772 |
| – of which profit sharing | 93 | 204 |
| Pensions | 2,504 | 2,429 |
| Number of persons | 16 | 18 |
| Subsidiaries | ||
| Salaries and other remuneration | 7,733 | 5,749 |
| – of which profit sharing | 568 | 230 |
| Pensions | 870 | 517 |
| Number of persons | 5 | 5 |
| Group | ||
| Salaries and other remuneration | 16,535 | 14,521 |
| – of which profit sharing | 661 | 434 |
| Pensions | 3,374 | 2,946 |
| Number of persons | 21 | 23 |
In 2008 the members of the Board of Directors did not receive any remuneration in addition to the Board and Committee fees.
The President is entitled to a bonus. The forms of the variable part of the salary are established annually. For 2009 the variable part of the salary is based on the Group's net sales and operating margin and may not exceed 50 per cent of annual salary. Bonus for other senior management for 2009 is based on outcomes related to individually specified targets at both Group and unit level. For 100 per cent target fulfillment in all parameters a bonus is payable of 50 percent of the basic salary.
Note 36 (cont)
Financial instruments
Under his employment contract the President is entitled to acquire options for a maximum of 100,000 shares in Studsvik AB from Briban Invest AB, Heureka Invest AB and Blue Whale Ltd. The option premium is determined in accordance with Black & Scholes formula.
On December 31, 2008 the President's holding of options was 20,000 corresponding to 20,000 shares. The President can exercise 20,000 call options no later than December 31, 2009. Calculation of the option premium is based on the following data:
| Exercise 2009 |
|---|
| 172.50 |
| 250.00 |
| 3.00 |
| 2.75% |
| 25% |
Based on the above assumptions the option premium was set at SEK 15.00 per share.
Pension
The pensionable age of the President is 65 years. The President receives a pension under the ITP plan. In addition to this, the company pays an annual pension premium equivalent to 17 per cent of the fixed salary to an endowment insurance owned by the company. The premium is paid up to the age of 65 on condition that the employment has not ceased before this. Retirement pension is paid from the month after the President reaches the age of 65 and for a period of 20 years. The size of the pension depends on the capital formation, including the return received at the time. As a rule, other group management executives receive a pension from the age of 65 in accordance with collective agreements on the Swedish labor market. The pension obligations are vested.
Termination and severance pay
The President's period of notice is 6 months for his own termination of employment and 12 months for termination by the company. In the case of termination of employment by the company, salary is payable during the period of notice as well as an additional severance payment equivalent to 12 months' salary. If Studsvik AB should be acquired through a stock exchange buyout or through the company being acquired by a new principal owner (more than 50 per cent of the shares) the President is entitled to termination pay as though the termination was on the part of the company. For other members of the group executive management, the main rule is that the period of notice is 6 months when employment is terminated by the employee and 12 months when terminated by the company. In the case of termination of employment by the company, salary is payable during the period of notice as well as an additional severance payment equivalent to 12 months' salary.
36 37
Note 37 Transactions with related parties
Studsvik, Inc. owns 50 per cent of THOR Treatment Technologies, LLC (TTT). In accordance with a Joint Venture Operating Agreement the owners are to provide management, technical and marketing services to TTT. Studsvik owns 15 per cent of UK Nuclear Waste Management Ltd (NWM), where Studsvik, in a consortium together with other partners, will manage and operate a repository for low level radioactive waste in the UK.
Transactions with associated companies
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Sale of services | ||
| – THOR Treatment Technologies, LLC | 7,315 | 1,069 |
| – UK Nuclear Waste Management Ltd | 4,155 | - |
| Receivables from related parties | ||
| – THOR Treatment Technologies, LLC | 2,664 | 142 |
| – UK Nuclear Waste Management Ltd | 1,176 | - |
Under an agreement with the owners the services are supplied on a commercial basis.
NOTES TO THE PARENT COMPANY ACCOUNTS 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46
Note 38 Net sales
Net sales by geographical market
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 3,964 | 1,934 |
| Europe, not including Sweden | 3,775 | 1,800 |
| North America | 3,059 | 1,900 |
| Total | 10,798 | 5,634 |
Note 42 Operational lease contracts
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Maturity within one year | 1,118 | 1,268 |
| Maturity after one year but within five years | 928 | 1,617 |
| Total | 2,046 | 2,885 |
The parent company's leases mainly refer to vehicles and premises with traditional terms and conditions.
Note 39 Employee benefits
| 2008 | 2007 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salaries and other remuneration (of which profit sharing) |
Social security expenses (of which pension costs) |
Salaries and other remuneration (of which profit sharing) |
Social security expenses (of which pension costs) |
|
| Board of Directors | 4,787 | 2,358 | 5,033 | 2,692 |
| and President | (–110) | (758) | (110) | (1,045) |
| Other employees | 8,977 | 6,016 | 6,926 | 4,756 |
| (650) | (3,043) | (94) | (2,483) | |
| Total | 13,764 | 8,374 | 11,959 | 7,448 |
| (540) | (3,801) | (204) | (3,528) |
See also note 36.
Note 40 Costs by nature of expense
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Purchases of material and services | 18,535 | 24,188 |
| Personnel costs | 21,406 | 20,225 |
| Depreciation/amortization | 336 | 322 |
| Total | 40,277 | 44,735 |
Services include fees and remuneration to accounting firms as follows
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| PricewaterhouseCoopers | ||
| Audit assignments | 801 | 391 |
| Consulting assignments | 202 | 6,173 |
Audit assignments refers to the examination of the annual accounts, the accounting records and the administration by the Board of Directors and the President. It also includes other duties that are incumbent on the company's auditors as well as advisory services and other types of support as a result of observations made through such an examination. All other tasks performed by the auditors are classified as Other assignments.
Note 41 Depreciation
| 2008 | 2007 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| According to plan |
Book | According to plan |
Book | ||
| Equipment and tools | 336 | 336 | 322 | 322 | |
| Total | 336 | 336 | 322 | 322 |
Note 43 Interest income and similar profit/loss items
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Interest | 12,707 | 16,121 |
| Capital gains on sale of shares | - | 35,022 |
| Exchange rate differences | 1,211 | 183 |
| Total | 13,918 | 51,326 |
| Of which, in respect of Studsvik Group companies | ||
| Interest | 10,187 | 11,154 |
| Total | 10,187 | 11,154 |
Note 44 Interest expense and similar profit/loss items
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Interest | 10,008 | 14,526 |
| Exchange rate differences | 990 | 1,105 |
| Other financial expenses | 67 | - |
| Total | 11,065 | 15,631 |
| Of which, in respect of Studsvik Group companies | ||
| Interest | 1,499 | 3,553 |
| Total | 1,499 | 3,553 |
Note 45 Appropriations
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Dissolution of tax allocation reserve | 4,363 | 329 |
| Total | 4,363 | 329 |
Note 46 Income tax
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Current tax | 5,819 | 10,423 |
| Current tax attributable to previous years | 112 | - |
| Deferred tax | 1,024 | 37 |
| Total | 6,955 | 10,460 |
Note 47 Deferred tax
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Deferred tax expense referring to temporary | ||
| differences | 16 | 54 |
| Deferred tax in the income statement | 1,120 | –17 |
| Total | 1,136 | 37 |
Difference between the company's tax expense and tax expense based on current tax rate
| 2008 | 2007 |
|---|---|
| –21,493 | –2,282 |
| 6,018 | 639 |
| –275 | –242 |
| 76 | 10,311 |
| 1,024 | - |
| 112 | - |
| - | –248 |
| 6,955 | 10,460 |
Note 50 Prepaid expenses and accrued income
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Prepaid rent | 215 | 203 |
| Prepaid insurance premiums | 128 | 279 |
| Other | 1,172 | 563 |
| Total | 1,515 | 1,045 |
48 49 50 51
47
Note 51 Shares and participations in subsidiaries
| Share of equity, % |
Share of voting rights, % |
Number of partici pations/ shares |
Nominal value |
Book value |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parent company's | ||||||
| holdings | ||||||
| Studsvik Holding, Inc. | 100 | 100 | 2,000 | kUSD | 25,372 568,747 | |
| Studsvik Nuclear AB | 100 | 100 | 5,000 | kSEK | 50,000 133,400 | |
| Studsvik Scandpower, | ||||||
| Inc. | 79 | 79 | 1,503 | kUSD | 149 | 984 |
| Studsvik Scandpower AB | 91 | 91 | 910 | kSEK | 91 | 603 |
| Studsvik Japan Ltd | 100 | 100 | 10,000 | kJPY | 10,000 | 373 |
| Studsvik Germany GmbH | 100 | 100 | kEUR | 26 | 241 | |
| Studsvik Verwaltungs | ||||||
| GmbH | 100 | 100 | kEUR | 26 | 261 | |
| AB SVAFO | 100 | 100 | 10,000 | kSEK | 1,000 | 1,000 |
| Studsvik UK Ltd | 100 | 100 1,022,500 | kGBP | 1,023 | 55,404 | |
| Studsvik Instrument | ||||||
| Systems AB | 100 | 100 | 17,000 | kSEK | 17,000 | 18,106 |
| Total | 779,119 |
Information on subsidiaries' corporate identity numbers and registered offices
| Corporate identity number |
Registered office |
|
|---|---|---|
| Studsvik Nuclear AB | 556051-6212 | Nyköping |
| Studsvik Scandpower, Inc. | 36-3088916 | Boston, USA |
| ALARA Holding i Skultuna AB | 556573-6591 | Nyköping |
| ALARA Engineering AB | 556514-8177 | Nyköping |
| Studsvik Scandpower AB | 556137-8190 | Nyköping |
| Studsvik Scandpower AS | 008797.45012 | Kjeller, Norway |
| Studsvik Scandpower GmbH | HRB,4839Norderstedt, Germany | |
| Studsvik Scandpower | Fischbach-Göslikon, | |
| Suisse GmbH | CH-400.4.021.112.4 | Switzerland |
| Studsvik Japan Ltd | - | Tokyo, Japan |
| Studsvik Holding, Inc. | 35-3481732 | Erwin, USA |
| Studsvik, Inc. | 36-2999957 | Erwin, USA |
| Studsvik Processing Facility Erwin, LLC | 36-4063922 | Erwin, USA |
| RACE Holding, LLC | 20-2472653 | Erwin, USA |
| Studsvik Processing Facility | ||
| Memphis, LLC | 62-1801098 | Erwin, USA |
| Studsvik Logistics, LLC | 77-0631902 | Erwin, USA |
| Studsvik Germany GmbH | HRB 504467 Mannheim, Germany | |
| Studsvik Verwaltungs GmbH | HRB 504468 Mannheim, Germany | |
| Studsvik GmbH & Co. KG | HRA 503411 Mannheim, Germany | |
| Studsvik Holding GmbH & Co. KG | HRA 503806 Mannheim, Germany | |
| Studsvik Industrieanlagen | ||
| Verwaltungs GmbH | HRB 505432 Mannheim, Germany | |
| Studsvik Industrieanlagen | ||
| GmbH & Co. KG | HRA 503808 Mannheim, Germany | |
| Studsvik SAS | 504 440 330 | Paris, France |
| AB SVAFO | 556446-3411 | Nyköping |
| Studsvik UK Ltd | 0477 2229 | Newcastle, England |
| Studsvik Alpha Engineering Ltd | 0365 8198 | Newcastle, England |
| Studsvik Instrument Systems AB | 556197-1481 | Nyköping |
Note 48 Property, plant and equipment
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Land, buildings and equipment | ||
| Opening cost of acquisition | 2,416 | 2,647 |
| Investments for the year | 182 | 533 |
| Sales and disposals | –827 | –764 |
| Closing accumulated cost of acquisition | 1,771 | 2,416 |
| Opening depreciation | –752 | –526 |
| Depreciation for the year | –336 | –322 |
| Sales and disposals | 21 | 96 |
| Closing accumulated depreciation | –1,067 | –752 |
| Closing residual value according to plan | 704 | 1,664 |
Note 49 Financial assets
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Shares in subsidiaries | ||
| Opening cost of acquisition | 822,346 | 805,305 |
| Shareholder's contribution | - | 32,875 |
| Sales | - | –12,977 |
| Adjustment of cost of acquisition | –278 | –2,857 |
| Closing cost of acquisition | 822,068 | 822,346 |
| Opening impairment losses | –42,949 | –42,949 |
| Closing impairment losses | –42,949 | –42,949 |
| Closing value | 779,119 | 779,397 |
Receivables from other Studsvik Group companies
| Loans to Studsvik Holding, Inc. Group | ||
|---|---|---|
| – opening cost of acquisition | 154,094 | 184,472 |
| – items added/deducted during the year | 15,220 | –30,378 |
| Closing value | 169,314 | 154,094 |
| Loan to Studsvik UK Ltd | ||
| – opening cost of acquisition | - | 16,409 |
| – items added/deducted during the year | 52,048 | –16,409 |
| Closing value | 52,048 | 0 |
| Other non-current receivables | ||
| Opening cost of acquisition | 10,918 | 11,870 |
| Items added/deducted during the year | 1,230 | –952 |
| Closing accumulated cost of acquisition/ | ||
| Closing residual value according to plan | 12,148 | 10,918 |
53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 52
Note 52 Untaxed reserves
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax allocation reserve | 2,510 | 6,874 |
| Total | 2,510 | 6,874 |
Note 58 Investment in property, plant and equipment
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Equipment and tools | 182 | 533 |
| Total | 182 | 533 |
Note 53 Liabilities to credit institutions
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Bank borrowings | ||
| Non-current portion | 201,915 | 137,113 |
| Current portion | 19,250 | 17,125 |
| Total | 221,165 | 154,238 |
Note 54 Accrued expenses and prepaid income
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay liability | 2,115 | 1,389 |
| Accrued social security expenses | 4,418 | 3,006 |
| Accrued interest expense | 1,836 | 312 |
| Other | 560 | 2,194 |
| Total | 8,929 | 6,901 |
Note 55 Pledged assets
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Shares in subsidiaries | 502 | 502 |
| Total | 502 | 502 |
Note 59 Cash flow from operating activities
Non-cash items
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Depreciation | 336 | 322 |
| Results from sale of property, plant and equipment | –770 | –684 |
| Other items | - | –487 |
| Total | –434 | –849 |
Note 60 Transactions with related parties
Intra-Group purchases and sales
The percentage of the year's purchases and sales referring to other companies within the Studsvik Group is presented below.
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Purchases | 4% | 10% |
| Sales | 100% | 100% |
The same pricing principles are applied to purchases and sales between group companies as applied to transactions with external parties.
Agreements on severance payments and other obligations to the Board members and the President
The President's period of notice is 6 months for his own termination of employment and 12 months for termination by the company. In the case of termination of employment by the company, salary is payable during the period of notice as well as an additional severance payment equivalent to 12 months' salary. If Studsvik AB should be acquired through a stock exchange buyout or through the company being acquired by a new principal owner (more than 50 per cent of the shares) the President is entitled to termination pay as though the termination was on the part of the company. See also note 36.
Note 56 Contingent liabilities
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Guarantees | 1,311 | 6,609 |
| Contingent liabilities referring to insurance | 1,845 | 11,713 |
| Total | 3,156 | 18,322 |
Note 57 Derivative financial instruments
| 2008 | 2007 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assets | Liabilities | Assets | Liabilities | |
| Forward exchange contracts | 15 | - | 71 | - |
Revaluation of forward exchange contracts is through profit or loss.
Outstanding forward exchange contracts, December 31, 2008
| Inflow currency USD |
|
|---|---|
| Maturity year | 000 |
| 2008 Amount | 188 |
| Average rate | 7.780 |
| Remeasured at fair value | 1,449 |
Note 61 Average number of employees
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Women | 5 | 4 |
| Men | 6 | 6 |
| Total | 11 | 10 |
Board members and senior management executives
| 2008 | 2007 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number Of on balance which sheet date men |
Number on balance sheet date |
Of which men |
||
| Board members | 11 | 8 | 11 | 9 |
| President and other senior executives |
5 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
Note 62 Investment in subsidiaries
| 2008 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|
| Shareholder's contribution | - | 32,875 |
| Total | - | 32,875 |
Audit report
To the Annual General Meeting of the shareholders of Studsvik AB (publ) Corporate identity number 556501-0997
We have audited the annual accounts, the consolidated accounts, the accounting records and the administration of the Board of Directors and the President of Studsvik AB (publ) for the year 2008. The company's annual accounts and the consolidated accounts are included in the printed version on pages 37–76. The Board of Directors and the President are responsible for these accounts and the administration of the company as well as for the application of the Annual Accounts Act when preparing the annual accounts and the application of international financial reporting standards IFRSs as adopted by the EU and the Annual Accounts Act when preparing the consolidated accounts. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the annual accounts, the consolidated accounts and the administration based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards in Sweden. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance that the annual accounts and the consolidated accounts are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the accounts. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and their application by the Board of Directors and the President and significant estimates made by the Board of Directors and the President when preparing the annual accounts and consolidated accounts as well as evaluating the overall presentation of information in the annual accounts and the consolidated accounts. As a basis for our opinion concerning discharge from liability, we examined significant decisions, actions taken and circumstances of the company in order to be able to determine the liability, if any, to the company of any Board member or the President. We also examined whether any Board member or the President has, in any other way, acted in contravention of the Companies Act, the Annual Accounts Act or the Articles of Association. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion set out below.
The annual accounts have been prepared in accordance with the Annual Accounts Act and give a true and fair view of the company's financial position and results of operations in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in Sweden. The consolidated accounts have been prepared in accordance with international financial reporting standards IFRSs as adopted by the EU and the Annual Accounts Act and give a true and fair view of the Group's financial position and results of operations. The statutory administration report is consistent with the other parts of the annual accounts and the consolidated accounts.
We recommend to the Annual General Meeting of shareholders that the income statements and balance sheets of the parent company and the Group be adopted, that the profit of the parent company be dealt with in accordance with the proposal in the administration report and that the members of the Board of Directors and the President be discharged from liability for the financial year.
Stockholm March 25, 2009
PricewaterhouseCoopers AB
Magnus Brändström Göran Tidström Authorized Public Accountant Authorized Public Accountant Auditor in charge
Corporate governance
Studsvik AB is a Swedish public company with its registered office in Nyköping and is listed on the NASDAQ OMX. The company is the parent of a Group that carries on business in nuclear technology in an international arena. Corporate governance is based on the Articles of Association and the Swedish Companies Act, together with other Swedish and foreign laws and ordinances. Studsvik has been following the Swedish Code of Corporate Governance since the beginning of July 2008. Departures from the Code are described in more detail in the text below.
This report has not been audited by the company's auditors.
General Meeting of Shareholders
The General Meeting is the company's highest decisionmaking body, where the shareholders exercise their influence through discussions and decisions. All shareholders entered in the share register five days before the General Meeting are welcome and can participate either in person or through a proxy.
Notification of attendance must be given to the company in accordance with the notice calling the meeting. Studsvik's ordinary general meeting, the Annual General Meeting, may be held in Nyköping or in Stockholm and must be held within six months of the close of the financial year. The notice calling the meeting is published in the daily newspaper Svenska Dagbladet and Post och Inrikes Tidningar (the Swedish Official Gazette) and on the company's website www.studsvik.com.
The Annual General Meeting elects the company's Board of Directors and decides on their fees. Moreover, the Annual General Meeting adopts the annual accounts, decides on appropriation of profits and discharges the Board of Directors and the President from liability. The Annual General Meeting also stipulates the principles for remuneration of senior management and determines the appointment of a Nomination Committee. At the Annual General Meeting in 2008, which was held at the World Trade Center in Stockholm on April 22, shareholders representing 48.3 (48.7) per cent of the total votes in the company participated.
The company has 3,928 shareholders. Studsvik's largest shareholders and the shareholder structure as at December 31, 2008 are presented in a table on page 36. The minutes of the Annual General Meeting can be found on the company's website.
Nomination Committee
The main task of the Nomination Committee is to propose candidates for the Board of Directors, Chairman of the Board and auditors and their fees, so that the Annual General Meeting can make well-founded decisions. The Nomination Committee must also propose a new Nomination Committee or how a Nomination Committee should be appointed. The 2008 Annual General Meeting decided that the company's Nomination Committee is to consist of the Chairman of the Board and representatives of each of the three largest shareholders. The Chairman of the Board of Directors was tasked with contacting the largest shareholders in the third quarter of 2008 and with them appointing a Nomination Committee.
The composition of the Nomination Committee was published in November 2008. The Nomination Committee consists of:
- Anders Oscarsson, SEB fonder (Chairman)
- Jan Barchan, Briban Invest (also a member of the Board of Studsvik)
- Frank Larsson, SHB fonder
- Anders Ullberg, Chairman of the Board of Studsvik
The Nomination Committee held one meeting during the year. The Nomination Committee's term of office is until a new Nomination Committee has been appointed.
The names of the members of the Nomination Committee were published on the company's website in November 2008 together with information on how shareholders can submit proposals to the Nomination Committee.
Composition of the Board of Directors
Studsvik AB's Board of Directors consists of seven board members elected by the general meeting of shareholders, as well as two members and two alternates appointed by the local trade union organizations Unionen and the Swedish Association of Graduate Engineers. At the Annual General Meeting in 2008 the following Board of Directors was elected:
- Anders Ullberg, Chairman of the Board
- Jan Barchan
- Ingemar Eliasson
- Lars Engström
- Anna Karinen
- Alf Lindfors
- Per Ludvigsson
For a more detailed presentation of the Board, please refer to pages 82–83.
Chairman
The Chairman of the Board leads the work of the Board. The work involves a particular responsibility to follow the company's development between Board meetings and ensure that the Board Members regularly receive the information necessary for performing a satisfactory job.
The Chairman is to maintain contact with the President and Vice President and hold meetings with them on various matters as needed.
Work of the Board of Directors
The task of the Board of Directors is to administer the company's business in the best way possible and safeguard the interests of the shareholders in its work. The Board's work follows rules of procedure adopted annually at the inaugural board meeting. The rules of procedure establish the division of duties between the Board and the President, the responsibilities of the Chairman and President respectively, and the forms of financial reporting.
The President participates in the work of the Board except when his own performance is being evaluated. Other members of the Executive Group Management team participate when required to provide the Board with information. The Group's Chief Financial Officer, who is also Executive Vice President, acts as secretary to the Board.
In 2008 the Board held eight ordinary meetings, including the inaugural meeting immediately following the Annual General Meeting, and in addition two extraordinary meetings.
In 2008 the Board of Directors devoted particular attention to the Group's continued development in the United Kingdom, deciding to invest in a metals recycling facility. Moreover, the Board dealt thoroughly with the development of waste treatment in the USA, where a new business model for managing intermediate level waste was implemented and parts of the operations were restructured. The Board of Directors has also regularly dealt with the respective segments' strategic position and conditions and established a strategic plan for the Group for the period 2009–2011.
The company's auditors have reported their observations from their audit of the annual accounts and examination of interim accounts and internal control at two meetings during the year.
The work of the Board is evaluated annually and the evaluation was dealt with at the last meeting of the year.
Policies, guidelines and instructions
The Board reviews and adopts Group policies and guidelines and the Group's Code of Conduct. These are dealt with, in accordance with Board procedures, at the October meeting or, in individual cases or where circumstances so require, at a different meeting. The President adopts guidelines and operative instructions based on policies and guidelines established by the Board. Guidelines and operative instructions issued by the President mainly relate to financial reporting and information technology (IT).
Remuneration Committee
The Board has appointed a Remuneration Committee from among its number. The Remuneration Committee submits proposals to the Board for the President's salary and other conditions of employment and approves salaries and other conditions of employment for the Executive Group Management proposed by the President. The
Committee also draws up the Board's proposals to the Annual General Meeting on principles for remuneration and other conditions of employment of the Executive Group Management.
The Remuneration Committee consists of Anders Ullberg, chairman, Jan Barchan and Anna Karinen.
Audit Committee
The Board has set up an Audit Committee to assure the quality of the company's financial reporting. The Audit Committee consists of Ingemar Eliasson, chairman, Per Ludvigsson and Anders Ullberg. The Chief Financial Officer presents the reports to the Committee. The Committee started its work in mid-2008. During the year the Committee has dealt with risks related to the Group's operations, project management, the Group's financing, organization of internal review, the Group's Code of Conduct and established forms and methods of work. The company's auditors reported their observations from the hard-close and internal control audit carried out at the time of the third quarter closing. The Committee meets regularly before each reporting date. The Committee held four meetings during the year.
Board fees
The total board fee paid by Studsvik AB for 2008 amounted to SEK 2,059,500 (2,112,000). In accordance with a resolution passed by the Annual General Meeting, the Chairman of the Board receives SEK 650,000 per year, the Vice Chairman SEK 350,000 per year and ordinary members SEK 225,000 per year. No fee is paid to the members appointed by the employee organizations. The chairman of the Audit Committee receives a fee of SEK 100,000 per year and members SEK 50,000 per year.
Auditors
At the 2007 Annual General Meeting the registered public accounting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers AB was elected as auditor for the period up to and including the 2011 Annual General Meeting. The auditors in charge are authorized public accountants Magnus Brändström and Göran Tidström. Besides the assignment for Studsvik Magnus Brändström also performs audit assignments for Acando, Intellecta and Note, among others. Göran Tidström performs audit assignments for TeliaSonera and Volvo, among others.
Remuneration to the company's auditors is paid in accordance with an approved invoice on agreed terms. For information concerning remuneration in 2008 please refer to note 8, page 61.
President and Executive Group Management
Studsvik's Board of Directors has appointed a President and CEO to be responsible for day-to-day management of the company and lead the business operations. The President prepares information and input for the Board's decision-making process and presents reports at the Board meetings.
The President has appointed a Group Management team consisting of the Executive Vice President/CFO, the heads of the Group functions and the heads of the five segments. The Group Management team meets monthly to consider the results and financial position of the Group and questions concerning strategy, budget follow-up, forecasts and general progress of business operations.
The President and central staff functions are based in Nyköping.
Taking into account the Board's rules of procedure and the policies and guidelines established by the Board, the Group functions are responsible for business development, allocation of financial resources among the Group's operations, capital structure and risk management. Their tasks also include questions of Groupwide acquisitions, certain major projects, the Group's financial reporting, communication with the stock market, internal and external information, IT and co-ordination and follow-up of safety, environment, work environment and quality.
The President and Executive Group Management are presented on pages 84–85.
Operative management
The Group's operative business is carried out mainly in subsidiaries of Studsvik AB, which by and large correspond to the Group's operating segments. In each subsidiary the board plays an active role under the leadership of the CEO or Executive Vice President. The boards of the subsidiaries follow day-to-day operations and establish business plans and budgets.
The business is carried on in accordance with the rules, guidelines and policies established by the parent company, and with local rules established by each subsidiary company board. The heads of the subsidiaries have budget responsibility and responsibility for ensuring growth in their respective companies, as well as responsibility for utilizing the synergies between the Group's various units.
Internal control
Internal control aims to ensure
- that company strategies and goals are followed up
- that shareholders' investments are protected
- that external financial reporting reflects the actual situation with reasonable certainty
- that the financial reports are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, laws and ordinances and other requirements of listed companies
The Board of Directors has the overall responsibility for ensuring the Group has effective internal controls. The President is responsible for ensuring that processes and organization are in place that guarantee internal control and the quality of financial reporting.
Review of internal controls
Studsvik has no special internal audit function. Review of internal controls is carried out by the Group Accounting and Finance function as an integrated aspect of the work of the business and finance controllers, which the Board has found to be appropriate in light of the Group's size and complexity. The controllers report to the CFO.
In addition, the external auditors perform an annual
review of internal controls. The review is based on checklists and question lists in material for self-assessment that are subsequently verified from the point of view of materiality through direct examination. The outcome of the examination is reported to the Audit Committee and the Board.
Control environment
The Group consists of relatively few operating units, for the most part with well-established processes. Structural and policy documents in the form of policies, guidelines and instructions have been drawn up to ensure a common view and method of working within the Group. These include:
- Authorization manual
- Financial reporting system
- Investments and acquisitions
- Budget and business plans
- Financing
- Currency hedging
- Cash management
- Risk management and insurance
All policies, guidelines and manuals are available on the company's intranet. Information on changes is provided at regular finance manager meetings.
Risk analysis
The review of internal controls performed by the external auditors is based on an annual assessment of risk and materiality that is made jointly by the Group Accounting and Finance function and the external audit function. The risk analysis and review was dealt with by the Audit Committee and the Board, identifying and deciding on improvements.
Control activities
Control activities are carried out regularly by the Group's controller organization, and at company level within various parts of the accounting and reporting process.
The control activities focus on known risks, but they are also intended to identify and correct any errors and nonconformities. Processes and systems are examined regularly with a view to identifying areas for improvement.
| Board members | Elected | Atten dance |
Remu neration Committee |
Audit Committee |
Independent of company |
Independent of share holders |
Fee SEK thousand |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anders Ullberg, Chairman of the Board | 2007 | 10/10 | 1/1 | 4/4 | yes | yes | 650 |
| Anna Karinen, deputy Chairman | 2003 | 10/10 | 1/1 | yes | no | 350 | |
| Jan Barchan | 2004 | 9/10 | 1/1 | yes | no | 225 | |
| Ingemar Eliasson | 2002 | 10/10 | 4/4 | yes | yes | 225 | |
| Lars Engström | 2008 | 5/6 | yes | yes | 225 | ||
| Alf Lindfors | 2006 | 9/10 | yes | yes | 225 | ||
| Per Ludvigsson | 2007 | 7/10 | 4/4 | yes | no | 225 | |
| Maria Lindberg | 2006 | 10/10 | |||||
| Roger Lundström | 2005 | 9/10 |
Board of Directors and auditors
Anders Ullberg
Danderyd, born in 1946 Chairman of the Board since 2007 Former President and CEO of SSAB, Svenskt Stål Chairman of the Board of Boliden, TietoEnator and Eneqvistbolagen and member of the board of Atlas Copco, Beijer Alma, Sapa Holding and Åkers Education: M.Sc. (Business and Economics) Holding: 15,000 shares
Anna Karinen
Sparreholm, born in 1963 Board member since 2003 Vice Chairman since 2007 Self-employed, in commercial real estate management Board member of Handelsbanken Flen branch office Education: Bachelor of laws Holding: 1,307,492 shares
Jan Barchan
Malmö, born in 1946 Board member since 2004 CEO of Briban Invest AB, Chairman of the Board of AudioDev AB and connectBlue AB and board member of Arcam AB, Assistera AB and TAT AB Education: M.Sc. (Business and Economics) Holding: 1,285,492 shares
Ingemar Eliasson
Drottningholm, born in 1939 Board member since 2002 Marshal of the Realm. Former county governor, minister and member of the Riksdag (Swedish parliament) Chairman of the Board of Stiftelsen Centralfonden and Prins Eugens Waldemarsudde Former Chairman of the Board of SBAB, the Stockholm Stock Exchange and Cancerfonden, former board member of SAS and SAS Sweden, Radio Sweden, the Swedish Central Bank and the National Agency for Government Employers Education: M.Sc. (Business and Economics)
Holding: 600 shares
Lars Engström
Örebro, born in 1963 Board member since 2008 President and CEO of Munters AB. Formerly active in Atlas Copco, most recently as President of the Atlas Copco Underground Rock Excavation Division Education: M.Sc. (Engineering) Holding: 2,000 shares
Alf Lindfors
Östhammar, born in 1946 Board member since 2006 Senior adviser, former head of the Electricity Generation business area and Vice President of Vattenfall AB Chairman of the Board of Vattenfall Inlandskraft AB Education: M.Sc. (Engineering) and postgraduate qualification in reactor technology Holding: 0 shares
Per Ludvigsson
Råå, born in 1943 Board member since 2008 Chairman of the Board of Inter IKEA Group Board member of IKANO, Catella, AudioDev and Briban Invest Education: M.Sc. (Business and Economics) Holding: 1,000 shares
EMPLOYEE REPRESENTATIVES
Maria Lindberg
Kibblesworth, Gateshead, United Kingdom, born in 1964 Board member since 2006, alternate board member 1999–2006 Employee representative for the Swedish Association of Graduate Engineers Works as Technical Services Manager Studsvik UK Education: Ph.D. in physical chemistry Holding: 200 shares
Roger Lundström
Nyköping, born in 1966 Board member since 2005, alternate board member 2003–2005. Employee representative for Unionen Works in microscopy and damage analysis at Studsvik Nuclear AB Education: Laboratory technician Holding: 70 shares
Lena Bergström
Nyköping, born in 1970 Alternate board member since 2008 Employee representative for the Swedish Association of Graduate Engineers Works in the marketing and sales department of waste treatment, Studsvik Nuclear AB Education: M.Sc. in Business Administration and Economics Holding: 0 shares
Per Ekberg
Nyköping, born in 1959 Alternate board member since 2006 Employee representative for Unionen Works in the materials research department at Studsvik Nuclear AB Education: Power generation technology Holding: 100 shares
AUDITORS
Magnus Brändström
Born in 1962 Authorized public accountant, PricewaterhouseCoopers, Stockholm Auditor of Studsvik since 2003
Göran Tidström
Born in 1946 Authorized public accountant, PricewaterhouseCoopers, Stockholm Auditor of Studsvik since 2003
Maria Lindberg and Lena Bergström Per Ekberg and Roger Lundström
Alf Lindfors and Lars Engström Anders Ullberg, Jan Barchan and Anna Karinen
Per Ludvigsson and Ingemar Eliasson
Executive Group Management
Magnus Groth
President and Chief Executive Officer Education: M.Sc. (Engineering) and M.Sc. (Business and Economics) Year of birth: 1963 Year of employment: 2005 Background: Vattenfall AB, Enron Nordic Energy AS, Boston Consulting Group Directorships: Board member of Hägglunds Drives AB Holding: 1,000 shares and 20,000 options
Sten-Olof Andersson
Senior Vice President, Groupwide projects and company acquisitions Education: Engineer Year of birth: 1955 Year of employment: 1996 Background: Project management and international sales in ABB's Power Generation segment, President of Studsvik subsidiaries Holding: 5,800 shares
Lewis Johnson
Head of segment USA Education: Master of International Business Administration Year of birth: 1962 Year of employment: 2007 Background: President and CEO of Radatec, Inc. Holding: 0 shares
Jerry Ericsson
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Education: M.Sc. (Business and Economics) Year of birth: 1951 Year of employment: 1984 Background: Controller and CFO of companies in various industries, at top management level since 1978 Holding: 16,600 shares
Magnus Arbell
President Studsvik Nuclear AB Education: M.Sc. (Materials Technology) Year of birth: 1963 Year of employment: 2008 Background: President StiebelEltron AB, President Sveaverken AB, President Kverneland Group Sweden, development engineer ABB Atom, chairman of Sörmland Provincial Bank Holding: 0 shares
Ulf Kannengießer
Head of segment Germany Education: Dipl.-Kfm Year of birth: 1961 Year of employment: 1990 Background: Managing Director of construction company Holding: 1,000 shares
Leif Andersson
Head of segment Sweden Education: Engineer Year of birth: 1950 Year of employment: 1975 Background: Employed in the nuclear industry since 1975; the last 19 years in the area of treatment of radioactive waste, President of Studsvik subsidiaries Holding: 5,500 shares
Eva Halldén
Senior Vice President, Group assurance and HR Education: M.Sc. (Chemical Engineering) Year of birth: 1959 Year of employment: 2003 Background: President of Studsvik Nuclear AB, Vice President of ABB Atom AB and Westinghouse Atom AB Holding: 400 shares
Mark Lyons
Head of segment United Kingdom Education: Bachelor of Science, Applied Chemistry Year of birth: 1971 Year of employment: 2005 Background: Business Manager at Rolls-Royce Nuclear Engineering Services Ltd, Business Development Director at MB Nuclear Ltd Holding: 1,000 shares
Magnus Groth
Sten-Olof Andersson
Lewis Johnson
Jerry Ericsson
Magnus Arbell
Ulf Kannengiesser
Leif Andersson
Eva Halldén
Mark Lyons
Five-year review
CONDENSED INCOME STATEMENTS 1)
| Amount, SEK million | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net sales | 1,285.9 | 1,314.7 | 1,219.6 | 1,088.3 | 1,025.4 |
| Cost of services sold | –986.3 | –1,000.1 | –906.5 | –802.9 | –839.3 |
| Gross profit | 299.6 | 314.6 | 313.1 | 285.4 | 186.1 |
| Selling expenses | –52.1 | –53.8 | –44.6 | –41.9 | –36.6 |
| Administrative expenses | –194.8 | –180.4 | –164.2 | –146.4 | –143.4 |
| Research and development costs | –44.8 | –41.8 | –39.8 | –35.5 | –34.6 |
| Other operating income | 2.8 | 25.1 | 14.3 | 19.8 | 1.7 |
| Other operating expenses | –6.5 | –1.6 | –7.5 | –2.6 | –0.1 |
| Pre-tax result from participation in associated company | 8.5 | - | - | - | 2.6 |
| Operating profit | 12.7 | 62.1 | 71.3 | 78.8 | –24.3 |
| Interest income and similar profit/loss items | 7.4 | 8.7 | 23.1 | 8.5 | 7.6 |
| Interest expense and similar profit/loss items | –19.4 | –24.8 | –37.3 | –11.1 | –15.1 |
| Profit after financial items | 0.7 | 46.0 | 57.1 | 76.2 | –31.8 |
| Tax on profit for the year | 0.4 | 1.2 | –22.3 | –28.7 | 56.1 |
| Profit from discontinued operations | - | - | - | 13.6 | –90.8 |
| NET PROFIT FOR THE YEAR | 1.1 | 47.2 | 34.8 | 61.1 | –66.5 |
1) The Strategic Business Areas Irradiation Services and Nuclear Medicine were discontinued in 2005. Comparative figures for 2005 and 2004 have been adjusted accordingly. These operations are reported as Profit/loss from discontinued operations.
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
| Amount, SEK million | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assets | |||||
| Goodwill | 363.0 | 311.7 | 304.7 | 127.4 | 120.8 |
| Other non-current assets | 661.5 | 530.9 | 523.6 | 476.1 | 420.8 |
| Trade receivables | 201.7 | 206.0 | 189.2 | 167.3 | 139.9 |
| Other non-interest bearing current assets | 136.9 | 120.5 | 92.3 | 89.1 | 151.4 |
| Cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments | 147.7 | 176.9 | 247.6 | 323.4 | 319.2 |
| Total assets | 1,510.8 | 1,346.0 | 1,357.4 | 1,183.3 | 1,152.1 |
| Equity and liabilities | |||||
| Equity | 610.5 | 568.4 | 558.7 | 566.6 | 443.4 |
| Minority interests | 0.3 | 3.4 | - | - | - |
| Non-current interest-bearing liabilities | 350.5 | 196.4 | 307.4 | 192.8 | 186.3 |
| Non-current non interest-bearing liabilities | 137.0 | 110.2 | 109.7 | 172.2 | 251.8 |
| Current interest-bearing liabilities | 37.7 | 122.3 | 39.8 | 0.1 | 7.8 |
| Current non interest-bearing liabilities | 374.8 | 345.3 | 341.8 | 251.6 | 262.8 |
| Total equity and liabilities | 1,510.8 | 1,346.0 | 1,357.4 | 1,183.3 | 1,152.1 |
CONDENSED CASH FLOW STATEMENTS
| Amount, SEK million | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating profit | 12.7 | 62.1 | 71.3 | 92.4 | –119.7 |
| Reversal of depreciation/amortization | 67.2 | 60.1 | 53.8 | 47.1 | 78.3 |
| Other non-cash items | –6.2 | –22.6 | –3.1 | –6.5 | 146.4 |
| 73.7 | 99.6 | 122.0 | 133.0 | 105.0 | |
| Financial items – net | –13.0 | –16.1 | –14.1 | –4.8 | –8.0 |
| Taxes | 1.2 | –6.8 | –2.4 | –28.2 | –12.5 |
| Cash flow before changes in working capital | 61.9 | 76.7 | 105.5 | 100.0 | 84.5 |
| Changes in working capital | –32.4 | –37.7 | –1.4 | –82.0 | 19.9 |
| Cash flow before investments | 29.5 | 39.0 | 104.1 | 18.0 | 104.4 |
| Investments | –103.3 | –122.4 | –344.7 | –45.0 | –52.4 |
| Cash flow after investments | –73.8 | –83.4 | –240.6 | –27.0 | 52.0 |
DATA PER SHARE
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| After new share issue and shareholders' contribution | |||||
| Number of shares at close of period | 8,218,611 | 8,218,611 | 8,218,611 | 8,218,611 | 8,116,611 |
| Average number of shares | 8,218,611 | 8,218,611 | 8,218,611 | 8,167,611 | 8,115,411 |
| Earnings per share before dilution, SEK | –0.05 | 5.65 | 4.24 | 7.48 | –8.19 |
| – of which from continuing operations | –0.05 | 5.65 | 4.24 | 5.81 | 2.99 |
| Earnings per share after dilution, SEK | –0.05 | 5.65 | 4.24 | 7.48 | –8.09 |
| – of which from continuing operations | –0.05 | 5.65 | 4.24 | 5.81 | 2.95 |
| Equity per share, SEK | 74.32 | 69.58 | 67.97 | 68.90 | 54.60 |
KEY FINANCIAL FIGURES AND RATIOS
| 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Margins | |||||
| Operating margin before depreciation/amortization, % | 6.2 | 9.3 | 10.3 | 11.6 | 4.7 |
| Operating margin before goodwill amortization, % | 6.2 | 9.3 | 10.3 | 7.2 | neg |
| Operating margin, % | 1.0 | 4.7 | 5.8 | 7.2 | neg |
| Profit margin, % | 0.1 | 3.5 | 4.7 | 7.0 | neg |
| Return on investment | |||||
| Return on operating capital, % | 1.6 | 9.0 | 13.0 | 20.9 | neg |
| Return on capital employed, % | 2.1 | 7.9 | 11.3 | 12.5 | neg |
| Return on equity, % | 0.2 | 8.2 | 6.2 | 12.1 | neg |
| Capital structure | |||||
| Operating capital, SEK million | 851.3 | 713.6 | 658.3 | 436.2 | 318.0 |
| Capital employed, SEK million | 999.0 | 890.5 | 905.8 | 759.5 | 637.2 |
| Equity, SEK million | 610.8 | 571.8 | 558.7 | 566.6 | 443.4 |
| Net interest-bearing debt, SEK million | 240.5 | 141.8 | 99.6 | –130.4 | –125.2 |
| Net debt/equity ratio | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.2 | –0.2 | –0.3 |
| Interest coverage ratio | 1.0 | 2.9 | 2.5 | 7.9 | neg |
| Equity-assets ratio, % | 40.4 | 42.5 | 41.2 | 47.9 | 38.5 |
| Cash flow | |||||
| Self-financing ratio | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 2.1 |
| Investments, SEK million | 108.4 | 127.3 | 344.7 | 45.0 | 52.4 |
| Employees | |||||
| Average number of employees | 1,130 | 1,141 | 1,279 | 1,278 | 1,353 |
| Net sales per employee, SEK million | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
Definitions of key figures and ratios
MARGINS
Operating margin before depreciation/amortization Operating profit before depreciation/ amortization as a percentage of net sales.
Operating margin before
goodwill amortization
Operating profit before goodwill amortization as a percentage of net sales.
Operating margin
Operating profit after depreciation/ amortization as a percentage of net sales.
Profit margin
Profit/loss after financial items as a percentage of net sales.
RETURN ON INVESTMENT
Return on operating capital
Operating profit as a percentage of average operating capital.
Return on capital employed
Profit/loss after financial items with financial expenses added back, as a percentage of average capital employed.
Return on equity
Profit for the year as a percentage of average equity.
CAPITAL STRUCTURE
Operating capital
Balance sheet total less non interest-bearing liabilities, current investments, cash and bank balances. Average operating capital has been calculated as opening balance plus closing balance of operating capital, divided by two.
Capital employed
Balance sheet total less non interest-bearing liabilities. Average capital employed has been calculated as opening balance plus closing balance of capital employed, divided by two.
Equity
The total of non-restricted and restricted equity at the end of the year. Average equity capital has been calculated as opening balance plus closing balance of equity capital, divided by two.
Net interest-bearing debt
Total of current and non-current interestbearing liabilities less current investments and cash and bank balances.
Net debt-equity ratio
Net interest-bearing liabilities divided by equity including minority interests. A negative net debt-equity ratio means that the total of current investments plus cash and bank balances exceeds interest-bearing liabilities.
Interest coverage ratio
Profit after financial income divided by financial expenses.
Equity-assets ratio
Equity including minority interests as a percentage of the balance sheet total.
CAPITAL TURNOVER RATE
Turnover rate of capital employed
Invoicing for the year divided by average capital employed.
CASH FLOW
Self-financing ratio
Cash flow before investments divided by investments.
Investments
Total of the acquisition of businesses/ subsidiaries plus acquisition of intangible assets and property, plant and equipment.
EMPLOYEES
Average number of employees
Average number of employees at the end of each month.
Net sales per employee
The year's net sales divided by the average number of employees.
DATA PER SHARE
Earnings per share
Profit for the year divided by the average number of shares. The average number of shares has been calculated as a weighted average of all shares in issue for the year.
Equity per share
Equity divided by the number of shares at the end of the period.
P/E ratio
The share price divided by earnings per share.
Worldwide
Studsvik AB
Visiting address: Västra Trädgårdsgatan 38 P.O. Box 556 SE-611 10 Nyköping Sweden Telephone +46 155 22 10 00 Fax +46 155 26 30 00 [email protected] www.studsvik.com
Studsvik UK Ltd
Unit 14, Princes Park Fourth Avenue Team Valley Trading Estate Gateshead Tyne & Wear NE11 0NF United Kingdom Telephone +44 191 482 1744 Fax +44 191 482 1747
Studsvik GmbH & Co. KG/ Studsvik Industrieanlagen GmbH & Co. KG Karlsruher Str.20 D-75179 Pforzheim Germany Telephone +49 7231 5 86 95 01 Fax +49 7231 5 86 95 02
Studsvik SAS Centre d'Affaires EURIPOLE 17 rue de Sancey ZA des Vauguillettes III F-89100 Sens France Telephone +33 3 86 66 60 75 Fax +33 3 86 66 60 76
Studsvik, Inc. 5605 Glenridge Dr., NE Suite 705 Atlanta, GA 20342 USA Telephone +1 404 497 4900 Fax +1 404 497 4901
Studsvik Processing Facility Memphis, LLC / Studsvik Logistics, LLC 2550 Channel Avenue P.O. Box 13143 Memphis, TN 38113 USA Telephone +1 901 775 0690 Fax +1 901 775 0629
Studsvik, Inc. / Studsvik Processing Facility Erwin, LLC 100 Nolichucky Avenue Erwin, TN 37650 USA Telephone +1 423 735 6300 Fax +1 423 735 4143
Studsvik Nuclear AB SE-611 82 Nyköping Sweden Telephone +46 155 22 10 00 Fax +46 155 26 30 70
Studsvik Scandpower, Inc. 1087 Beacon Street, Suite 301 Newton, MA 02459-1700 USA Telephone +1 617 965 7450 Fax +1 617 965 7549
Studsvik Japan Ltd Nakamura Bldg. 3F 2-7-14 Shibuya, Shibuya-ku Tokyo 150-0002 Japan Telephone +81 3 5464 3771 Fax +81 3 5464 3708
Studsvik AB (publ) Annual report 2008 Corporate identity number 556501-0997 © Studsvik AB (publ)
This report is a translation of the Swedish statutory report. In the event of any discrepancies between this document and the Swedish original, the latter shall govern.The content of this annual report may not, in whole or part, be reproduced or stored in a machine-readable medium without the previous permission of Studsvik AB (publ).
Production: Meze Design Group AB, Comir AB Photo: Jan Lindblad Jr, Mattias Bardå, Janne Höglund, Fredrik Ekenborg and others Printing: Trosa Tryckeri
Studsvik AB (publ)
Västra Trädgårdsgatan 38 P.O. Box 556 SE-611 10 Nyköping Sweden Telephone +46 155 2210 00 www.studsvik.com