AI assistant
STREAMPLAY STUDIO LIMITED — Annual Report 2008
Sep 29, 2008
65841_rns_2008-09-29_9c28784a-9d81-4361-9af2-991369b08924.pdf
Annual Report
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer

Gippsland Limited and its Controlled Entities
ABN 31 004 766 376
Annual Financial Report
30 June 2008
| DIRECTORS' REPORT 3 | ||
|---|---|---|
| AUDITORS' INDEPENDENCE DECLARATION 11 | ||
| CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT 12 | ||
| INCOME STATEMENT 16 | ||
| BALANCE SHEET 17 | ||
| CASH FLOW STATEMENT 18 | ||
| STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY 19 | ||
| NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 21 | ||
| 1 | CORPORATEINFORMATION 21 | |
| 2 | SUMMARYOFSIGNIFICANTACCOUNTINGPOLICIES 21 | |
| 3 | REVERSALOFIMPAIRMENTLOSS 35 | |
| 4 | SEGMENTINFORMATION 35 | |
| 5 | REVENUESANDEXPENSES 39 | |
| 6 | INCOMETAX 39 | |
| 7 | EARNINGSPERSHARE 42 | |
| 8 | CASHANDCASHEQUIVALENTS 43 | |
| 9 | TRADEANDOTHERRECEIVABLES(CURRENT) 44 | |
| 10 | OTHERFINANCIALASSETS(NON-CURRENT) 44 | |
| 11 | PROPERTY,PLANTANDEQUIPMENT 46 | |
| 12 | EXPLORATIONANDEVALUATIONEXPENDITURE 48 | |
| 13 | EMPLOYEEBENEFITS 49 | |
| 1415 | TRADEANDOTHERPAYABLES(CURRENT) 50PROVISIONS 51 | |
| 16 | ISSUEDCAPITALANDRESERVES 52 | |
| 17 | COMMITMENTSANDCONTINGENCIES 53 | |
| 18 | RELATEDPARTYDISCLOSURE 54 | |
| 19 | EVENTSAFTERTHEBALANCESHEETDATE 55 | |
| 20 | AUDITORS'REMUNERATION 56 | |
| 21 | JOINTVENTURE 56 | |
| DIRECTORS' DECLARATION 57 | ||
| INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT 58 | ||
| SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION 60 |
Your directors submit their report on the company and its controlled entities for the financial year ended 30 June 2008.
DIRECTORS
The names of the directors in office at any time during or since the end of the year are as below. Directors were in office for this entire period unless otherwise stated.
Mr Robert John Telford Dr John Morrison Chisholm Mr John Stuart Ferguson Dunlop Mr John Damian Kenny Mr Jon Starink
COMPANY SECRETARY
The following person held the position of company secretary at the end of the financial year:
Mr Rowan Caren – Bachelor of Commerce, Chartered Accountant. Mr Caren was employed by the chartered accountancy firm Price Waterhouse Coopers in Australia and overseas for six years and has been directly involved in the minerals exploration industry for a further ten years. Mr Caren also provides company secretarial and corporate advisory services to several exploration companies and is a member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia.
PRINCIPLE ACTIVITIES
The principal activities of the economic entity during the financial year were:
' exploration and development of commercially and economically viable mineral resources.
There were no significant changes in the nature of the consolidated group's principal activity during the financial year.
OPERATING RESULTS
The loss of the consolidated group after providing for income tax and eliminating minority equity interests amounted to $3,425,133 (2007: $4,191,218).
Dividends
No dividend was paid or declared during the financial year and the directors do not recommend the payment of a dividend for the financial year ended 30 June 2008.
Review of Operations
During the year the company continued to focus on the development of the Abu Dabbab tin/tantalum project in Egypt and the exploration for gold and base metals in the Wadi Allaqi region of Egypt. A detailed review of the company and the consolidated group's activities is set out in the company's Annual Report.
Financial Position
The net assets of the consolidated group have increased by $1,722,113 to $4,134,098 at 30 June 2008. The increase has largely resulted from the following factors:
- ' proceeds from the share issue and option conversion raising $4,140,715
- ' following a review of the expenditure on the Abu Dabbab project, some costs were reclassified as operating expenses and the impairment of the project development expenditure was removed resulting in a net increase in value of $2,184,129 offset by:
- o exploration expenditure of $1,064,693
- o administration expenditure of $2,051,916 and
- o employee benefits of $1,247,101
The directors believe that the company is in a sound financial position to be able to continue with the development of the Abu Dabbab project, undertake further exploration at the Wadi Allaqi leases and to take advantage of further opportunities to grow the company, should they arise.
SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN STATE OF AFFAIRS
The following significant changes in the state of affairs of the parent entity occurred during the financial year:
- a) Completed the issue and allotment of 33,674,180 shares pursuant to the conversion of listed options having an exercise price of A$ 0.09 which expired on 31 December 2007.
- b) Completed the issue and allotment of 12,655,553 shares at a placement price of £0.045 (A$ 0.093) on 26 June 2008.
AFTER BALANCE DATE EVENTS
On 25 July 2008, Gippsland Limited ("Gippsland") and Stellar Resources Limited ("Columbus") announced that they will merge their respective interests in the Tasmanian Heemksirk Tin project (formerly known as the Zeehan Tin project) into Stellar's subsidiary Columbus Metals Limited ("Columbus"). The agreement is conditional upon Columbus raising a minimum of A$10 million and being admitted to the official list of the ASX on or before 31 December 2008.
Gippsland will be issued with 15 million A$0.25 fully paid ordinary shares or the same number of shares that Stellar will hold in Columbus at the time of its admission to the official list of the ASX, if that number is greater than 15 million shares. Upon listing, Columbus will also invite a nominee from Gippsland to join the board of Columbus as a non-executive director.
No other matters or circumstances have arisen since the end of the financial year which significantly affected or may significantly affect the operations of the consolidated entity, the results of those operations, or the state of affairs of the consolidated entity in future financial years.
FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS, PROSPECTS AND BUSINESS STRATEGIES
Information as to likely developments in the operations of the Company and the consolidated group and the expected results of those operations in future financial years has not been included in this report because, in the opinion of the Directors, it would prejudice the interests of the Company and the consolidated group.
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
The consolidated group's operations are not currently subject to any significant environmental regulations under either Australian or Egyptian legislation. However, the board is committed to achieving a high standard of environmental performance, and regular monitoring of potential environmental exposures is undertaken by management. The board considers that the consolidated group has adequate systems in place for the management of its environmental requirements and is not aware of any breach of those environmental requirements as they apply to the consolidated group.
An environmental and social impact assessment was updated during the financial year for the Abu Dabbab project in Egypt.
The consolidated group is required to carry out its activities in accordance with the Mining Laws and regulations in the areas in which it undertakes its exploration activities.
INFORMATION ON DIRECTORS
Robert John Telford - Chairman (Executive) AWAIT (Chem), MRACI
Mr Telford holds an Associate degree in Pure Chemistry (Organic and Inorganic) having graduated from the Institute of Technology of Western Australia (now Curtin University) in 1967.
Mr Telford has been a major shareholder in technology-based industries for some 30 years in the capacity of Chief Executive Officer ("CEO"). He has been involved in the pharmaceutical industry having been a past chairman and major shareholder of the company Inovax Limited. Mr Telford has held the position of CEO in companies involved in inorganic and organic chemical manufacture for over 15 years. He has been involved in the international resource industry for some 20 years via private and public companies and in the main is responsible for securing the Company's interest in its Egyptian resource projects.
Mr Telford is a Member of the Royal Australian Chemical Institute.
He is not currently a director of any other listed company nor has he been within the last three years.
Interest in Shares and Options - 20,126,446 ordinary shares in Gippsland Limited.
John Morrison Chisholm - Director (Executive) BSc (Hons), PhD, FAusIMM, FAIG
Dr Chisholm is a geologist with wide experience in exploration geology and exploration management. His previous posts include lecturer at the University of Western Australia and Associate Professor at Curtin University. He has held senior positions with various mineral resource entities.
In 1984 Dr Chisholm joined Western United Mining Services Pty Ltd and as Managing Director he led a large group of geoscientists. He was involved in the discovery of the Transvaal and Bounty mines.
He is a Fellow of both the Australian Institute of Geoscientists and the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy with Chartered Practising status in Geology. Practising Chartered Status is the highest level of recognition that can be attained by professional geologists in Australia and Dr Chisholm was one of the first geologists in Australia to have been awarded this honour.
He is not currently a director of any other listed company nor has he been within the last three years.
Interest in Shares and Options – 2,420,000 ordinary shares in Gippsland Limited.
DIRECTORS' REPORT
Jon Starink – Director (Executive)
BSC (Hons), BChemE(Hons), MApplSc, FAusIMM, FIEAust, FIChemE, MRACI, MTMS, CPEng, CChem, CSci
Mr Starink's qualifications include Bachelor of Science with First Class Honours (University of Sydney), a Bachelor of Chemical Engineering with First Class Honours (University of Sydney) and a Master of Applied Science (University of Sydney). His academic achievements include the Union Carbide Prize in Inorganic Chemistry, Western Mining Prize in Chemical Engineering and the Beckman Coulter Postgraduate Prize for Best Overall Performance in Molecular Biotechnology. He held the position of Deputy Head Department of Chemical Engineering at Curtin University of Technology during 1984-85 & 1987.
Based in London, Jon Starink is a Chartered Professional Engineer, a Chartered Scientist and a Chartered Industrial Chemist, a Fellow of the Institution of Engineers Australia, a Fellow of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, a Fellow of the Institution of Chemical Engineers, a Member of The Metallurgical Society and a Member of the Royal Australian Chemical Institute.
He has 30 years experience in the mining industry in the role of both Executive and Non-Executive director. His extensive practical and operational experience includes engineering design and project management; mining exploration management; science and engineering research & development and process innovation & development.
Mr Starink served in senior technical and engineering roles with the Sons of Gwalia Ltd Greenbushes tantalum-tin project for 10 years where he was directly responsible for process development, project design and construction management for the tin smelter and tantalum extraction projects.
Other than as noted below he is not currently a director of any other listed company nor has he been within the last three years:
' Director of Manaccom Corporation Limited until 22 November 2007
Interest in Shares and Options – 300,000 ordinary shares in Gippsland Limited.
John Stuart Ferguson Dunlop – Director (Non-executive) BE, M Eng Sc, P Cert Arb, CP, FAusIMM, FIMMM, MSME, MCIMM, MMICA
Mr Dunlop holds a Bachelor and Masters Degree in Mining Engineering from the University of Melbourne. He is a certified Mine Manager having approximately 40 years of international surface and underground mining experience in a variety of base metals, industrial and precious metals production.
He is a former Director of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (AusIMM) and remains Chairman of its affiliate, the Mineral Industry Consultants Association (MICA). He is also Chairman of Alliance Resources Ltd, Drummond Gold Ltd and Alkane Resources Ltd.
Mr Dunlop is a highly experienced mining professional having been involved in the design, construction and on-going operation of a number of major resource projects throughout the world. He has a detailed knowledge of the Company's 40Mt Abu Dabbab tantalum project in Egypt with his ongoing involvement in the preparation of the project's original Bankable Feasibility Study, and subsequent updates to the BFS.
He has operated his own mining consulting firm based in Perth since 1992 and was previously a senior executive with BHP's (now BHP Billiton) Minerals Division, before becoming General Manager Operations for Aztec Mining Co Ltd until this company's takeover by Normandy Mining Ltd.
Interest in Shares and Options - Nil.
John Damian Kenny – Director (Non-executive) B Com (Hons), LLB
Mr Kenny is a corporate and resources lawyer has a specialised interest in venture capital, initial public offerings and mergers and acquisitions. He has extensive experience in public equity fundraisings and the pricing of equity, debt and derivative securities. He is a Director of The Ark Fund Limited.
Interest in Shares and Options - 2,250,000 ordinary shares in Gippsland Limited.
REMUNERATION REPORT (Audited)
This report details the nature and amount of remuneration for each director of Gippsland Limited, and for the executives receiving the highest remuneration.
Remuneration Policy
The remuneration policy of Gippsland Limited has been designed to align director and executive objectives with shareholder and business objectives by providing a fixed remuneration component and offering specific long-term incentives. The board of Gippsland Limited believes the remuneration policy to be appropriate and effective in its ability to attract and retain the best executives and directors to run and manage the consolidated group, as well as create goal congruence between directors, executives and shareholders.
The board's policy for determining the nature and amount of remuneration for board members and senior executives of the consolidated group is as follows:
- ' The remuneration policy, setting the terms and conditions for the executive directors and other senior executives, was developed and approved by the board after seeking professional advice from independent external consultants.
- ' All executives receive a base salary (which is based on factors such as length of service and experience).
- ' The board reviews executive packages annually by reference to the consolidated group's performance, executive performance and comparable information from industry sectors.
All remuneration paid to directors and executives is valued at the cost to the company and expensed.
The board policy is to remunerate non-executive directors at market rates for time, commitment and responsibilities. The board determines payments to the non-executive directors and reviews their remuneration annually, based on market practice, duties and accountability. Independent external advice is sought when required. The maximum aggregate amount of fees that can be paid to nonexecutive directors is subject to approval by shareholders at the Annual General Meeting. Fees for nonexecutive directors are not linked to the performance of the consolidated group. However, to align directors' interests with shareholder interests, the directors are encouraged to hold shares in the company and are able to participate in the option plan.
KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL REMUNERATION
2008
| KeyManagementPerson | Position | Short-termBenefitsCash, salaryandcommissions$ | Share-basedPaymentOptions$ | PostemploymentBenefitsSuperannuation$ | Total$ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mr RJ Telford | Executive Chairman | 260,211 | - | - | 260,211 |
| Dr JM Chisholm | Executive Director | 237,500 | - | - | 237,500 |
| Mr JSF Dunlop | Non-executive Director | 60,412 | - | - | 60,412 |
| Mr JD Kenny | Non-executive Director | 38,750 | - | - | 38,750 |
| Mr J Starink | Executive Director | 120,000 | - | - | 120,000 |
| Mr PR Sims | Chief Financial Officer | 230,303 | - | 23,030 | 253,333 |
| Mr RS Caren | Company Secretary | 60,000 | - | - | 60,000 |
| 1,007,176 | - | 23,030 | 1,030,206 |
2007
| Key ManagementPerson | Position | Short-termBenefitsCash, salaryandcommissions$ | Share-basedPaymentOptions$ | PostemploymentBenefitsSuperannuation$ | Total$ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mr RJ Telford | Executive Chairman | 207,069 | - | - | 207,069 |
| Dr JM Chisholm | Executive Director | 177,917 | - | - | 177,917 |
| Mr JSF Dunlop | Non-executive Director | 44,648 | - | - | 44,648 |
| Mr JD Kenny | Non-executive Director | 38,333 | - | - | 38,333 |
| Mr J Starink | Executive Director | 17,742 | - | - | 17,742 |
| Mr PR Sims | Chief Financial Officer | 188,294 | 60,975 | 18,827 | 268,096 |
| Mr RS Caren | Company Secretary | 52,500 | - | - | 52,500 |
| Mr RS Middlemas | Company Secretary | 4,580 | - | - | 4,580 |
| 731,083 | 60,975 | 18,827 | 810,885 |
Options issued as part of remuneration for the year ended 30 June 2007
Options were issued to an executive as part of his remuneration. The options were not issued based on performance criteria, but are issued to the majority of directors and executives of Gippsland Limited and its subsidiaries to increase goal congruence between executives, directors and shareholders.
Options Granted As Remuneration
| 2008 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terms & Conditions for Each Grant | |||||
| Key Management | Value per Option | ||||
| Personnel | Granted No. | Grant Date | at Grant Date | Exercise Price | Exercise Date |
| $ | $ | ||||
| Nil | - | - | - | - | - |
2007
| Terms & Conditions for Each Grant | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Key Management | Value per Option | ||||
| Personnel | Granted No. | Grant Date | at Grant Date | Exercise Price | Exercise Date |
| $ | $ | ||||
| PR Sims | 2,250,000 | 15.09.2006 | 0.03 | 0.15 | 31.12.2007 |
Meetings of Directors
During the financial year, 12 meetings of directors were held. Attendances by each director during the year were as follows:
| Remuneration | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Directors' Meetings | Committee | ||||
| Numbereligible toattend | Numberattended | Numbereligible toattend | Numberattended | ||
| RJ Telford | 12 | 12 | 1 | 1 | |
| JM Chisholm | 12 | 10 | - | - | |
| JSF Dunlop | 12 | 11 | 1 | 1 | |
| JD Kenny | 12 | 6 | 1 | - | |
| J Starink | 12 | 6 | - | - |
Indemnifying Officers or Auditor
During or since the end of the financial year the company has given an indemnity or entered into an agreement to indemnify, or paid or agreed to pay an insurance premium as follows:
The company has paid premiums to ensure any director or officer of Gippsland Limited against liabilities for costs and expenses incurred by them in defending any legal proceedings arising out of their conduct while acting in the capacity of director or officer of the company, other than conduct involving a wilful breach of duty in relation to the company. The amount of the premium is $14,616.
Options
At the date of this report, the unissued ordinary shares of Gippsland Limited under option are as follows:
| Grant Date | Date of Expiry | Exercise Price | Number under Option |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16.05.2006 | 16.05.2012 | $0.135 | 25,000,000 |
| 05.02.2008 | 15.12.2011 | £0.07 | 4,000,000 |
During the year ended 30 June 2008, the following ordinary shares of Gippsland Limited were issued on the exercise of options granted. No amounts are unpaid on any of the shares.
| Grant Date | Exercise Price | Number of Shares Issued |
|---|---|---|
| 31.12.2007 | $0.09 | 33,674,180 |
No person entitled to exercise the option had or has any right by virtue of the option to participate in any share issue of any other body corporate.
Proceedings on Behalf of Company
No person has applied for leave of Court to bring proceedings on behalf of the company or intervene in any proceedings to which the company is a party for the purpose of taking responsibility on behalf of the company for all or any part of those proceedings.
The company was not a party to such proceedings during the year.
Non-audit Services
The board of directors is satisfied that the provision of non-audit services during the year is compatible with the general standard of independence for auditors imposed by the Corporations Act 2001. The directors are satisfied that the services disclosed in Note 20 did not compromise the external auditor's independence for the following reasons:
' The nature of the services provided do not compromise the general principles relating to auditor independence in accordance with APES 110: Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants set by the Accounting Professional and Ethical Standards Board.
The following fees for non-audit services were paid / payable to the external auditors during the year ended 30 June 2008:
| $ | |
|---|---|
| Taxation Services | 2,992 |
| Corporate Advisory Fees | 22,697 |
Auditors Independence Declaration
The lead auditor's independence declaration for the year ended 30 June 2008 has been received and can be found on page 15 of the directors' report.
Signed in accordance with a resolution of the Board of Directors.
R J TELFORD, Director
Dated this 30th day of September 2008.

AUDITOR'S INDEPENDENCE DECLARATION
As lead engagement partner for the audit of Gippsland Limited and its controlled entities for the year ended 30 June 2008, I declare that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, there have been:
- (i) no contraventions of the independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 in relation to the audit; and
- (ii) no contraventions of any applicable code of professional conduct in relation to the audit.
This declaration is in respect of Gippsland Limited and the entities it controlled during the year.
PKF Chartered Accountants
Neil Smith Partner
Dated at Perth, Western Australia this 30th day of September 2008.
Tel: 61 8 9278 2222 | Fax: 61 8 9278 2200 | www.pkf.com.au West Australian Partnership | ABN 39 542 778 278 Level 7, BGC Centre | 28 The Esplanade | Perth | Western Australia 6000 | Australia PO Box Z5066 | St Georges Terrace | Perth | Western Australia 6831
PKF is a national association of independent chartered accounting and consulting firms, each trading as PKF. PKF Australia Ltd is also a member of PKF International, an association of legally independent chartered accounting and consulting firms.
The directors of Gippsland Limited believe firmly that benefits will flow from the maintenance of the highest possible standards of corporate governance and strive for compliance with best corporate governance practice where practicable.
Trading Policy
The company's policy regarding directors and employees trading in its securities is set by the board. The policy restricts directors and employees from acting on material information until it has been released to the market and adequate time has been given for this to be reflected in the security's prices. Additionally directors and employees are restricted from trading in the Company's securities during close periods preceding periodic lodgement dates.
Website Disclosure of Corporate Governance Practices and Policies
Further information relating to the company's corporate governance practices and policies has been made publicly available on the company's web site at www.gippslandltd.com
Period of Office Held by each director in office at the date of the Annual Report
Robert John Telford – appointed 14 January 1992, tenure 16 years John Morrison Chisholm – appointed 18 October 1994, tenure 13 years John Damian Kenny – appointed 2 September 1999, tenure 9 years John Stuart Ferguson Dunlop – appointed 1 July 2005, tenure 3 years Jon Starink – appointed 8 May 2007, tenure 1 year
Skills, Experience and Expertise of Directors
The skills, experience and expertise relevant to the position held by each director is disclosed in the Directors' Report.
Independent Professional Advice
The Board has determined that individual Directors have the right in connection with their duties and responsibilities as Directors, to seek independent professional advice at the Company's expense. The engagement of an outside adviser is subject to prior approval of the Chairman and this will not be withheld unreasonably. If appropriate, any advice so received will be made available to all Board members.
Performance Evaluation
The performance evaluation of board members occurs by way of an annual review by the whole board. The evaluation was carried out in accordance with this policy during the year.
A review of senior executive performance was completed in accordance with company policy in March 2008.
Management Assurance in accordance with Section 295A of the Corporations Act
The board has received assurance from the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer that the declaration provided in accordance with section 295A of the Corporations Act is founded on a sound system of risk management and internal control and that the system is operating effectively in all material respects in relation to financial reporting risks.
Remuneration Committee
The names of the members of the remuneration committee and their attendance at meetings of the committee are disclosed in the Directors' Report.
Retirement Schemes/Equity Based Remuneration Schemes for Directors
The Company currently has no schemes for retirement benefits, other than superannuation, for directors. The company does not have an equity based remuneration schemes.
Commentary on Departures from Best Practice Recommendations
The ASX Corporate Governance Council released the 2nd edition of the Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations in August 2007. The Company has elected to early adopt the revised Principles and Recommendations. During the financial year the company has complied with the majority of the eight essential corporate governance principles and the corresponding best practice recommendations as published by the ASX Corporate Governance Council except as detailed below:
Council Recommendation 2.1 A majority of the Board should be independent directors.
The Board comprises two independent directors and three non-independent directors. Therefore a majority of the Board is not independent.
While the Board strongly endorses the position that boards need to exercise independence of judgment, it also recognises that the need for independence is to be balanced with the need for skills, commitment and a workable board size. The Board believes it has recruited members with the skills, experience and character to discharge its duties and that any greater emphasis on independence would be at the expense of the Board's effectiveness.
Messrs Kenny and Dunlop are Non-Executive Directors of the Company. Both Non-Executive Directors are considered independent within the ASX Corporate Governance Council's guidelines.
Mr Dunlop is a principal at John Dunlop & Associates Pty Ltd, engineering service providers for the Company. Mr Dunlop has been directly involved in the provision of the engineering services by John Dunlop & Associates Pty Ltd, however the undertaking of this role does not constitute Mr Dunlop or John Dunlop & Associates Pty Ltd as being material service providers to the Company. Where required, Mr Dunlop does not participate in the discussions regarding the provision of engineering services.
At present the Company believes that the individuals on the Board can make, and do make, quality and independent judgments in the best interests of the Company on all relevant issues. Directors having a conflict of interest in relation to a particular item of business must absent themselves from the Board Meeting before commencement of discussion on the topic.
The Board considers that the Company is not currently of a size, nor are its affairs of such complexity to justify the expense of appointing additional independent Non-Executive Directors.
Council Recommendation 2.2 The chair should be an independent director.
The company's chairman, Mr Robert John Telford, is considered by the board not to be independent in terms of the ASX Corporate Governance Council's definition of independent director. However the board believes that the chairman is able and does bring quality and independent judgement to all relevant issues falling within the scope of the role of chairman.
The board considers that the company is not currently of a size, nor are its affairs of such complexity to necessitate the appointment of an independent non-executive chair.
Council Recommendation 2.3 The roles of chair and chief executive officer should not be exercised by the same individual.
The company's chairman Mr Robert John Telford currently holds the position of both chairperson and chief executive officer. The board recognises the importance of independence in decision-making, however believes that Mr Telford is the most appropriate person for the position due to his extensive industry experience and previous record as chairman. The board recognises that Mr Telford has been a major force in the company's success and that as the company enters its next growth stage, Mr Telford's industrial experience and strong and effective leadership will be beneficial.
Council Recommendation 2.4 The board should establish a nomination committee.
The Board does not have a nomination committee. The Board considers that the Company is not currently of a size to justify the formation of a nomination committee. The Board as a whole undertakes the process of reviewing the skill base and experience of existing Directors to enable identification or attributes required in new Directors. Independent consultants are engaged to identify possible new candidates for the Board, when appropriate.
The Board acknowledges this does not comply with Recommendation 2.4. If the Company's activities increase in size, scope and nature, the appointment of a nomination committee will be reviewed by the Board and implemented if appropriate.
Council Recommendation 4.1 The board should establish an audit committee.
The Board does not have an audit committee. The Board considers that the Company is not of a size, nor are its financial affairs of such complexity to justify the formation of an audit committee. The Board as a whole undertakes the selection and proper application of accounting policies, the identification and management of risk and the review of the operation of the internal control systems.
The Board acknowledges this does not comply with Recommendation 4.1. If the Company's activities increase in size, scope and nature, the appointment of an audit committee will be reviewed by the Board and implemented if appropriate.
Council Recommendation 4.2 The audit committee Structure should be structured so that it:
- ' consists only of non-executive directors;
- ' consists of a majority of independent directors;
- ' is chaired by an independent chair, who is not chair of the board;
- ' has at least three members.
Refer comments on council recommendation 4.1
Council Recommendation 4.3 The audit committee should have a formal charter.
Refer comments on council recommendation 4.1
Council Recommendation 7.2
The board should require management to design and implement the risk management and internal control system to manage the Company's material business risks and report to it on whether those risks are being managed effectively. The board should disclose that management has reported to it as to the effectiveness of the Company's management of its material business risks.
The Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer are currently reviewing the risk management and internal control systems and will report to the Board in due course. Given the nature and size of the company and the Board's ultimate responsibility to manage the risks of the Company this delay is not considered critical.
Council Recommendation 8.1
The board should establish a remuneration committee.
The Board did not have a remuneration committee until March this year and a formal charter was not adopted until August 2008. Until March 2008, the Board considered that the Company was not of a size, nor its financial affairs of such complexity to justify the formation of a remuneration committee. In setting the remuneration levels the Board took into consideration the group's financial and operating performance and undertook a comparison of remuneration levels utilising industry benchmarks.
Income Statement
| Notes | CONSOLIDATED | PARENT | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008$ | 2007$ | 2008$ | 2007$ | |||
| Continuing Operations | ||||||
| Revenue | ||||||
| Finance income | 5(b) | 77,542 | 125,262 | 74,152 | 125,226 | |
| 77,542 | 125,262 | 74,152 | 125,226 | |||
| Other Income | 5(a) | 3,338 | 10,168 | 1,835 | 1,935 | |
| Foreign exchange losses | (935,947) | (53,429) | (5,189) | (38,262) | ||
| Exploration expense | (59,515) | (287,516) | (59,515) | (34,061) | ||
| Project development expense | (211,937) | (35,526) | - | - | ||
| Impairment reversal of exploration expenditure | 3 | 2,184,129 | - | - | - | |
| Depreciation and amortisation expense | (70,353) | (41,119) | (22,216) | (23,536) | ||
| Impairment of intercompany loans | 10 | - | - | (3,219,534) | (2,768,260) | |
| Impairment of exploration and evaluation expenditure | 12 | (1,109,807) | (2,236,564) | - | - | |
| Employee benefits expense | 5(d) | (1,247,101) | (671,932) | (806,986) | (579,374) | |
| Administration expense | 5(c) | (2,051,916) | (1,000,497) | (1,292,517) | (955,541) | |
| Finance costs | 5(b) | (3,566) | (65) | (56) | (65) | |
| Loss from continuing operations before tax | (3,425,133) | (4,191,218) | (5,330,026) | (4,271,808) | ||
| Income tax expense | 6 | - | - | - | - | |
| Loss after tax from continuing operations | (3,425,133) | (4,191,218) | (5,330,026) | (4,271,808) | ||
| Loss attributable to minority interest | - | - | - | - | ||
| Loss attributable to members of the parent | 7 | (3,425,133) | (4,191,218) | (5,330,026) | (4,271,808) | |
| Earnings per share (cents per share)- basic for loss for the year- basic for loss from continuing operations- diluted for loss for the year- diluted for loss from continuing operations- dividends paid per share | 7 | (1.24)(1.24)(1.24)(1.24)- | (1.77)(1.77)(1.77)(1.77)- |
Balance Sheet
AS AT 30 JUNE 2008
| Notes | CONSOLIDATED | PARENT | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||
| $ | $ | $ | $ | |||
| ASSETS | ||||||
| Current Assets | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 8 | 1,592,840 | 2,611,219 | 1,328,816 | 2,315,359 | |
| Trade and other receivables | 9 | 47,941 | 122,806 | 47,941 | 121,255 | |
| Prepayments | 46,095 | 19,530 | 35,051 | 19,530 | ||
| Total Current Assets | 1,686,876 | 2,753,555 | 1,411,808 | 2,456,144 | ||
| Non-Current Assets | ||||||
| Other financial assets | 10 | - | - | 27,688 | 305 | |
| Property, plant and equipment | 11 | 199,747 | 154,908 | 68,253 | 88,136 | |
| Exploration and evaluation expenditure | 12 | 3,105,666 | - | - | - | |
| Total Non-Current assets | 3,305,413 | 154,908 | 95,941 | 88,441 | ||
| TOTAL ASSETS | 4,992,289 | 2,908,463 | 1,507,749 | 2,544,585 | ||
| LIABILITIESCurrent Liabilities | ||||||
| Trade and other payables | 14 | 799,863 | 458,177 | 150,622 | 201,514 | |
| Provisions | 15 | 58,328 | 38,301 | 21,243 | 11,476 | |
| Total Current Liabilities | 858,191 | 496,478 | 171,865 | 212,990 | ||
| TOTAL LIABILITIES | 858,191 | 496,478 | 171,865 | 212,990 | ||
| NET ASSETS | 4,134,098 | 2,411,985 | 1,335,884 | 2,331,595 | ||
| EQUITYEquity attributable to equity holders ofthe parent | ||||||
| Issued capital | 16 | 29,550,495 | 25,409,780 | 29,550,495 | 25,409,780 | |
| Retained earnings / (Accumulated losses) | (26,561,730) | (23,136,597) | (28,547,013) | (23,216,987) | ||
| Other reserves | 16 | 1,145,333 | 138,802 | 332,402 | 138,802 | |
| Parent interests | 4,134,098 | 2,411,985 | 1,335,884 | 2,331,595 | ||
| Minority interests | - | - | - | - | ||
| TOTAL EQUITY | 4,134,098 | 2,411,985 | 1,335,884 | 2,331,595 |
Cash Flow Statement
| Notes | CONSOLIDATED | PARENT | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||
| $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | ||
| Cash flows from operating activities | |||||
| Payments to suppliers and employees | (2,918,308) | (1,559,832) | (1,951,685) | (1,615,754) | |
| Other | 3,338 | - | 1,835 | - | |
| Net cash flows used in operating activities | 8 | (2,914,970) | (1,559,832) | (1,949,850) | (1,615,754) |
| Cash flows from investing activities | |||||
| Interest received | 80,423 | 132,549 | 77,032 | 124,280 | |
| Purchase of property, plant and equipment | (46,130) | (160,342) | (2,333) | (67,459) | |
| Increase in investment in subsidiary | - | - | (27,383) | - | |
| Purchase of exploration and evaluation expenditure | (2,155,401) | (2,437,175) | - | - | |
| Other | - | - | (3,219,535) | (2,773,570) | |
| Net cash flows used in investing activities | (2,121,108) | (2,464,968) | (3,172,219) | (2,716,749) | |
| Cash flows from financing activities | |||||
| Proceeds from issue of shares (net of issue costs) | 16 | 4,140,715 | 2,751,505 | 4,140,715 | 2,751,505 |
| Net cash flows from financing activities | 4,140,715 | 2,751,505 | 4,140,715 | 2,751,505 | |
| Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (895,363) | (1,273,295) | (981,354) | (1,580,998) | |
| Net foreign exchange differences | (123,016) | (53,429) | (5,189) | (38,263) | |
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 2,611,219 | 3,937,943 | 2,315,359 | 3,934,620 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | 8 | 1,592,840 | 2,611,219 | 1,328,816 | 2,315,359 |
Statement Of Changes In Equity
| Minityor | Total | |
|---|---|---|
| Attributabletoityholdeftheteqursoparen | intetres | ityequ |
| Issdueiltacap$ | Retaindeinearngs$ | OtherReserves$ | Tolta$ | $ | $ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONSOLIDATED | ||||||
| At1July2006 | 22,658,274 | (18,945,379) | 77,827 | 3,790,722 | 3,790,722 | |
| Lofothessryear | - | (4,191,218) | - | (4,191,218) | - | (4,191,218) |
| Tolinc/ efohetatomexpenseryear | - | (4,191,218) | - | (4,191,218) | - | (4,191,218) |
| IssfShaCailtaueorep | 2,896,294 | - | - | 2,896,294 | - | 2,896,294 |
| CoTrtiontsansacs | ()144,788 | - | - | ()144,788 | - | ()144,788 |
| Cot of sha-bdtssreasepaymen | - | - | 60,975 | 60,975 | - | 60,975 |
| A30Ju2007tne | 25,409,780 | (23,136,597) | 138,802 | 2,411,985 | - | 2,411,985 |
| Culaiondiffetratrrencnsrencesy | - | - | 812,931 | 812,931 | - | 812,931 |
| Lofohetssreary | - | (3,42133)5, | - | (3,42133)5, | - | (3,42133)5, |
| / efoTotalinctheomexpenseryear | - | ()3,425,133 | - | ()3,425,133 | - | ()3,425,133 |
| Issf shaitalueorecap | 1,181,290 | - | - | 1,181,290 | - | 1,181,290 |
| TrionCottsansacs | (71,251) | - | - | (71,251) | - | (71,251) |
| Exisef oiontercops | 3,030,667 | - | - | 3,030,667 | - | 3,030,667 |
| Cof st oha-bdtssreasepaymen | - | - | 193,600 | 193,600 | - | 193,600 |
| At30Ju2008ne | 29,550,495 | ()26,561,730 | 1,145,333 | 4,134,098 | - | 4,134,098 |
Statement Of Changes In Equity (Cont)
| Minityor | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Aibubleiholdefhettrtatotytteqursoparen | intetres | Eqityu |
| Issdueitalcap | Retaindeinearngs | OtherReserves | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |
| PARENT | ||||||
| A1July2006t | 22,68,2457 | (18,9419)5,7 | 8277,7 | 3,90,9227 | 3,90,9227 | |
| Lofohetssreary | - | (4,21,808)7 | - | (4,21,808)7 | - | (4,21,808)7 |
| / efoTotalinctheomexpenseryear | - | ()4,271,808 | - | ()4,271,808 | - | ()4,271,808 |
| Issf shaitalueorecap | 2,896,294 | - | - | 2,896,294 | - | 2,896,294 |
| Trionttsansaccos | (144,788) | - | - | (144,788) | - | (144,788) |
| Cof sha-bdt otssreasepaymen | - | - | 60,975 | 60,975 | - | 60,975 |
| At30Ju2007ne | 25,409,780 | ()23,216,987 | 138,802 | 2,331,595 | - | 2,331,595 |
| foLothessryear | - | ()5,330,026 | - | ()5,330,026 | - | ()5,330,026 |
| Totalinc/ efotheomexpenseryear | - | (5,330,026) | - | (5,330,026) | - | (5,330,026) |
| Issf shaitalueorecap | 1,181,290 | - | - | 1,181,290 | - | 1,181,290 |
| Trtiontsansaccos | (1,21)75 | - | - | (1,21)75 | - | (1,21)75 |
| Exisef oiontercops | 3,030,667 | - | - | 3,030,667 | - | 3,030,667 |
| Cot of sha-bdtssreasepaymen | - | - | 193,600 | 193,600 | - | 193,600 |
| At30Ju2008ne | 29,550,495 | (28,547,013) | 332,402 | 1,335,884 | - | 1,335,884 |
Notes to the Financial Statements
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2008
1 CORPORATE INFORMATION
The financial report of Gippsland Limited for the year ended 30 June 2008 was authorised for issue in accordance with a resolution of the directors on 23 September 2008.
Gippsland Limited is a company limited by shares incorporated in Australia whose shares are publicly traded on the Australian Securities exchange.
The nature of the operations and principal activities of the Group are described in note 3.
2 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(a) Basis of Preparation
The financial report is a general-purpose financial report, which has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 and applicable Australian Accounting Standards. The financial report has also been prepared on a historical cost basis, except for investment properties, land and buildings, derivative financial instruments and available-for-sale financial assets that have been measured at fair value.
The financial report is presented in Australian dollars.
Australian Accounting Standards include Australian Equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards (AIFRS). Compliance with AIFRS ensures that the financial report complies with International Financial Report Standards ('IFRS').
(b) Going Concern
The consolidated entity and the parent entity incurred a net loss of $3,425,133 and $5,330,026, respectively for the year then ended 30 June 2008. As at that date, the cash resources of the group totalled $1,592,840. The directors have prepared a cash flow forecast for the year ending 30 June 2009 which indicates that the current cash resources may not meet expected cash outgoings.
The directors are currently seeking to raise additional equity funds to provide sufficient working capital for the company to continue through to finalising a loan agreement and further capital raising for the construction of the Abu Dabbab project in Egypt. The outcome of this pre project equity raising is not yet concluded.
These conditions indicate a material uncertainty that may cast significant doubt about the consolidated entity's and parent entity's ability to continue as going concerns.
The directors are well advanced in negotiations for project financing with Kfw Bankengruppe which is owned 80% by the German Federal Government and 20% by the German federal states (Bundeslander).
The directors have prepared cash flow forecasts that indicate that the amount and type of funding the consolidated entity and the parent entity will require to construct the Abu Dabbab project. This forecast assumes that a loan agreement is finalised with a major bank and an equity component of the funding is raised from investors. The outcome of this debt and further equity raising is not yet confirmed or concluded.
The ability of the consolidated entity and the parent entity to continue as going concerns is principally dependent upon raising additional capital and / or debt finance to fund exploration and project development, funding the Abu Dabbab project, other commitments, other principal activities and working capital.
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2008
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
Should the consolidated entity and the parent entity be unable to continue as going concerns, they may be required to realise their assets and extinguish their liabilities other than in the ordinary course of business, and at amounts that differ from those stated in the financial statements.
These financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts or classification of liabilities and appropriate disclosures that may be necessary should the consolidated entity and parent entity be unable to continue as going concerns.
(c) Adoption of New Accounting Standards
The company has adopted AASB 7 'Financial Instruments; Disclosures' and all consequential amendments which became applicable on 1 January 2007. The adoption of this standard has only affected the disclosure in these financial statements. There has been no affect on profit and loss or the financial position of the entity.
(d) New Standards and Interpretations Not Yet Adopted
Certain new accounting standards and interpretations have been published that are not mandatory for 30 June 2008 reporting periods. The Group's and the parent entity's assessment of the impact of these new standards and interpretations is set out below.
| New or revised requirement | Effective forannual reportingperiodsbeginning/endingon or after | More information | Impact on Group |
|---|---|---|---|
| New and revised Standards | |||
| AASB 101 Presentation of FinancialStatements (Revised September 2007),AASB 2007-8 Amendments to AustralianAccounting Standards & Interpretations andAASB 2007-10 Further Amendments toAASBs arising from AASB 101The revised standard affects the presentationof changes in equity and comprehensiveincome. It does not change the recognition,measurement or disclosure of specifictransactions and other events required byother AASB standards. Australian issuers willneed to make use in financial reports of thedescriptions- Statement of FinancialPerformance and Position rather thanBalance Sheet and Income Statement anduse the term "financial report" and not"financial statement." The AmendingStandard updates references in various otherpronouncements. | Beginning 1 January2009 | This will be adoptedfor the year ended30 June 2010 | This is a disclosurestandard andtherefore does notaffect amountsrecognised in thefinancialstatements. |
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2008
2 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
| New or revised requirement | Effective forannual reportingperiodsbeginning/endingon or after | More information | Impact on Group |
|---|---|---|---|
| New and revised Standards | |||
| AASB 123 Borrowing Costs (Revised), AASB2007-6 Amendments to AustralianAccounting Standards 1, 101, 107, 111, 116,138 and Interpretations 1 & 12This revision eliminates the option to expenseborrowing costs on qualifying assets andrequires that they be capitalised. Thetransitional provision provided allows forprospective application of this revision fromeither application date or adoption date ifprior to 1 January 2009. The AmendingStandard eliminates reference to theexpensing option in various otherpronouncements. | Beginning 1 January2009 | This will be adoptedfor the year ended30 June 2010 | To date thecompany has notbeen involved insuch transactions,therefore the impactis not expected tobe material. |
| AASB 3 Business Combinations (Revised),AASB 127 Consolidated and SeparateFinancial Statements (Amended), AASB2008-3 Amendments to AASBs arising fromAASB 3 and AASB 127This revision changes the application ofacquisition accounting for businesscombinations and accounting for noncontrolling interests. The revised andamended standards incorporate manychanges which will have a significant impacton the profit and loss for entities entering intobusiness combinations. | Beginning 1 July2009 | This will be adoptedfor the year ended30 June 2010 | If the groupundertakes suchtransactions, thisneeds to beconsidered. |
| AASB 8 Operating Segments, AASB 2007-3Amendments to Australian AccountingStandards 5, 6, 102, 107, 119, 127, 134, 136,1023 & 1038 arising from AASB 8This standard supersedes AASB 114Segment Reporting introducing a US GAAPapproach of management reporting as part ofthe convergence project with FASB. | Beginning 1 January2009 | This will be adoptedfor the year ended30 June 2010 | This is a disclosurestandard andtherefore does notaffect amountsrecognised in thefinancialstatements. |
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2008
2 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
| New or revised requirement | Effective forannual reportingperiodsbeginning/endingon or after | More information | Impact on Group |
|---|---|---|---|
| New and revised Standards | |||
| AASB 2008- 1 – Amendments to AASB 2"Share Based PaymentsThe amendment clarifies that vestingconditions are restricted to:'service conditions; and'Performance conditions only. | Beginning 1 January2009 | This will be adoptedfor the year ended30 June 2010 | The impact of thisstandard will affectthe valuation ofoptions issued bythe company but isnot considered tobe material. |
| Other features of a share-based payment arenot vesting conditions. This means that allother terms and conditions are accounted forin the value of the share or option at grantdate. |
(e) Basis of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements comprise the financial statements of Gippsland Limited and its subsidiaries as at 30 June each year ('the Group').
The financial statements of subsidiaries are prepared for the same reporting period as the parent company, using consistent accounting policies.
Adjustments are made to bring into line any dissimilar accounting policies that may exist.
All intercompany balances and transactions, including unrealised profits arising from intra-group transactions, have been eliminated in full. Unrealised losses are eliminated unless costs cannot be recovered.
Subsidiaries are consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the group and cease to be consolidated from the date on which control is transferred out of the Group.
Where there is loss of control of a subsidiary, the consolidated financial statements include the results for the part of the reporting period during which Gippsland Limited has control.
(f) Interest in joint venture operation
The Group's interest in its joint venture operation is accounted for by recognising the Group's assets and liabilities from the joint venture, as well as expenses incurred by the Group and the Group's share of income earned from the joint venture, in the consolidated financial statements.
(g) Foreign currency translation
Both the functional and presentation currency of Gippsland Limited and its Australian subsidiaries is Australian dollars ($AUD).
Transactions in foreign currencies are initially recorded in the functional currency at the exchange rates ruling at the date of the transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are retranslated at the rate of exchange ruling at the balance sheet date.
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2008
2 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
(g) Foreign currency translation (continued)
All differences in the consolidated financial report are taken to the income statement with the exception of differences on foreign currency borrowings that provide a hedge against a net investment in a foreign entity. These are taken directly to equity until the disposal of the net investment, at which time they are recognised in the income statement.
Tax charges and credits attributable to exchange differences on those borrowings are also recognised in equity.
Non-monetary items that are measured in terms of historical cost in a foreign currency are translated using the exchange rates as at the date of the initial transaction.
Non-monetary items measured at fair value in a foreign currency are translated using the exchange rates at the date when the fair value was determined.
The functional currency of the overseas subsidiaries Tantalum Egypt JSC, Nubian Resources JSC and Nubian Resources PLC is Egyptian pounds (EGP).
As at the reporting date the assets and liabilities of these overseas subsidiaries are translated into the presentation currency of Gippsland Limited at the rate of exchange ruling at the balance sheet date and the income statements are translated at the weighted average exchange rates for the year.
The exchange differences arising on the retranslation are taken directly to a separate component of equity.
. On disposal of a foreign entity, the deferred cumulative amount recognised in equity relating to that particular foreign operation is recognised in the income statement.
(h) Property, plant and equipment
Plant and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and any impairment in value.
Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the asset as follows:
Leasehold Improvements - over 2 to 5 years Plant and equipment - over 3 to 10 years
Impairment
The carrying values of plant and equipment are reviewed for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable.
For an asset that does not generate largely independent cash inflows, the recoverable amount is determined for the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs.
If any such indication exists and where the carrying values exceed the estimated recoverable amount, the assets or cash-generating units are written down to their recoverable amount.
The recoverable amount of plant and equipment is the greater of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset.
Impairment losses are recognised in the income statement.
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2008
2 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
(h) Property, plant and equipment (continued)
An item of property, plant and equipment is derecognised upon disposal or when no future economic benefits are expected to arise from the continued used of the asset.
Any gain or loss arising on derecognition of the asset (calculated as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the item) is included in the income statement in the period the item is derecognised.
(i) Exploration and evaluation expenditure
Exploration, evaluation and development expenditure incurred is accumulated in respect of each identifiable area of interest. These costs are only carried forward to the extent that they are expected to be recouped through the successful development of the area or where activities in the area have not yet reached a stage that permits reasonable assessment of the existence of economically recoverable reserves.
Accumulated costs in relation to an abandoned area are written off in full against profit in the year in which the decision to abandon the area is made.
A regular review is undertaken of each area of interest to determine the appropriateness of continuing to carry forward costs in relation to that area of interest.
(j) Recoverable amount of assets
At each reporting date, the Group assesses whether there is any indication that an asset may be impaired. Where an indicator of impairment exists, the Group makes a formal estimate of recoverable amount. Where the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its recoverable amount the asset is considered impaired and is written down to its recoverable amount.
Recoverable amount is the greater of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. It is determined for an individual asset, unless the asset's value in use cannot be estimated to be close to its fair value less costs to sell and it does not generate cash inflows that are largely independent of those from other assets or groups of assets, in which case, the recoverable amount is determined for the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs.
In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset.
(k) Investments
All investments are initially recognised at cost, being the fair value of the consideration given and including acquisition charges associated with the investment.
After initial recognition, investments are measured as fair value. Gains or losses on investments are recognised in the income statement.
Non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments and fixed maturity are classified as held-to-maturity when the Group has the positive intention and ability to hold to maturity. Investments intended to be held for an undefined period are not included in this classification.
For investments where there is no quoted market price, fair value is determined by reference to the current market value of another instrument which is substantially the same or is calculated based on the expected cash flows of the underlying net asset base of the investment.
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2008
2 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
(k) Investments (continued)
Purchases and sales of financial assets that require delivery of assets within the time frame generally established by regulation or convention in the market place are recognised on the trade date i.e. the date that the Group commits to purchase the asset.
(l) Trade and other receivables
Trade receivables, which generally have 30-90 day terms, are recognised and carried at original invoice amount less an allowance for any uncollectible amounts.
An estimate for impairment loss is made when collection of the full amount is no longer probable. Bad debts are written off when identified.
(m) Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and short-term deposits in the balance sheet comprise cash at bank and in hand and shortterm deposits with an original maturity of three months or less.
For the purposes of the Cash Flow Statement, cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and cash equivalents as defined above, net of outstanding bank overdrafts.
(n) Trade and other payables
Trade and other payables are carried at amortised cost due to their short term nature they are not discounted. They represent liabilities for goods and services provided to the Group prior to the end of the financial year that are unpaid and arise when the Group becomes obliged to make future payments in respect of the purchase of these goods and services. The amounts are unsecured and are usually paid within 30 days of recognition.
(o) Provisions
Provisions are recognised when the Group has a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event, it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation.
Where the Group expects some or all of a provision to be reimbursed, for example under an insurance contract, the reimbursement is recognised as a separate asset but only when the reimbursement is virtually certain. The expense relating to any provision is presented in the income statement net of any reimbursement.
If the effect of the time value of money is material, provisions are determined by discounting the expected future cash flows at a pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and, where appropriate, the risks specific to the liability.
Where discounting is used, the increase in the provision due to the passage of time is recognised as a finance cost.
(p) Share-based payment transactions
The Group provides remuneration to employees (including directors) of the Group in the form of share-based payment transactions, whereby employees render services in exchange for shares or rights over shares ('equity-settled transactions').
The cost of these equity-settled transactions with employees is measured by reference to the fair value at the date at which they are granted.
In valuing equity-settled transactions, no account is taken of any performance conditions, other than conditions linked to the price if the shares of Gippsland Limited ('market conditions').
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2008
2 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
(p) Share-based payment transactions (continued)
The cost of equity-settled transactions is recognised, together with a corresponding increase in equity, over the period in which the performance conditions are fulfilled, ending on the date on which the relevant employees become fully entitled to the award ('vesting date').
The cumulative expense recognised for equity-settled transactions at each reporting date until vesting date reflects (i) the extent to which the vesting period has expired and (ii) the number of awards that, in the opinion of the directors of the Group, will ultimately vest. This opinion is formed
based on the best available information at balance date. No adjustment is made for the likelihood of market performance conditions being met as the effect of these conditions is included in the determination of fair value at grant date.
No expense is recognised for awards that do not ultimately vest, except for awards where vesting is conditional upon a market condition.
Where the terms of an equity-settled award are modified, as a minimum an expense is recognised as if the terms had not been modified. In addition, an expense is recognised for any increase in the value of the transaction as a result of the modification, as measured at the date of modification.
Where an equity-settled award is cancelled, it is treated as if it had vested on the date of cancellation, and any expense not yet recognised for the award is recognised immediately. However, if a new award is substituted for the cancelled award, and designated as a replacement award on the date that it is granted, the cancelled and new award are treated as if they were a modification of the original award, as described in the previous paragraph.
The dilutive effect, if any, of outstanding options is reflected as additional share dilution in the computation of earnings per share (see note 7).
(q) Leases
Leases where the lessor retains substantially all the risks and benefits of ownership of the asset are classified as operating leases. Initial direct costs incurred in negotiating an operating lease are added to the carrying amount of the leased asset and recognised over the lease term on the same bases as the lease income.
Operating lease payments are recognised as an expense in the income statement on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Revenue is recognised to the extent that it is probable that the economic benefits will flow to the Group and the revenue can be reliably measured. The following specific recognition criteria must also be met before revenue is recognised:
Interest
Revenue is recognised as the interest accrues (using the effective interest method, which is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash receipts through the expected life of the financial instrument) to the net carrying amount of the financial asset.
(r) Income tax
Deferred income tax is provided on all temporary differences at the balance sheet date between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for the financial reporting purposes.
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2008
2 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
(r) Income Tax (continued)
Deferred income tax liabilities are recognised for all taxable temporary differences:
- ' except where the deferred income tax liability arises from the initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction that is not a business combination and, at the time of the transaction, affects neither the accounting profit nor taxable profit or loss; and
- ' in respect of taxable temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries, associates and interests in joint ventures, except where the timing of the reversal of the temporary differences can be controlled and it is probable that the temporary differences will not reverse in the foreseeable future.
Deferred income tax assets are recognised for all deductible temporary differences, carry-forward of unused tax assets and unused tax losses, to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will
be available against which the deductible temporary differences, and the carry-forward of unused tax assets and unused tax losses can be utilised:
- ' except where the deferred income tax asset relating to the deductible temporary differences arises from the initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction that is not a business combination and, at the time of the transaction, affects neither the accounting profit nor taxable profit or loss; and
- ' in respect of deductible temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries, associates and interests in joint ventures, deferred tax assets are only recognised to the extent that it is probable that the temporary differences will reverse in the foreseeable future and taxable profit will be available against which the temporary differences can be utilised.
The carrying amount of deferred income tax assets is reviewed at each balance sheet date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow all or part of the deferred income tax asset to be utilised.
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the year when the asset is realised or the liability is settled, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date.
Income taxes relating to items recognised directly in equity are recognised in equity and not in the income statement.
(s) Other taxes
Revenues, expenses and assets are recognised net of the amount of GST except:
- ' where the GST incurred on a purchase of goods and services is not recoverable from the taxation authority, in which case the GST is recognised as part of the cost of acquisition of the asset or as part of the expense item as applicable; and
- ' receivables and payables are stated with the amount of GST included.
The net amount of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority is included as part of receivables or payables in the balance sheet.
Cash flows are included in the Cash Flow statement on a gross basis and the GST component of cash flows arising from investing and financing activities, which is recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority are classified as operating cash flows.
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2008
2 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
(s) Other taxes (continued)
Commitments and contingencies are disclosed net of the amount of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority.
(t) Derecognition of financial instruments
The derecognition of a financial instrument takes place when the Group no longer controls the contractual rights that comprise the financial instrument, which is normally the case when the instrument is sold, or all the cash flows attributable to the instrument are passed through to an independent third party.
(u) Critical Accounting Judgements and Key Sources of Estimation Uncertainty
In the application of AIFRS management is required to make judgments, estimates and assumptions about carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. The estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstance, the results of which form the basis of making the judgments. Actual results may differ from these estimates. The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the year in which the estimate is revised if the revision affects only that year, or in the year of the revision and future years if the revision affects both current and future years.
Judgments made by management that have significant effects on the financial statements and estimates with a significant risk of material adjustments in the next year are disclosed, these relate to impairment of inter-company loans and exploration and evaluation expenditure. Accounting policies are selected and applied in a manner which ensures that the resulting financial information satisfies the concepts of relevance and reliability, thereby ensuring that the substance of the underlying transactions or other events is reported.
(v) Financial risk management objectives and policies
The Group's principal financial instruments comprise receivables, payables, cash and short-term deposits.
The Group manages its exposure to key financial risks, including interest rate and currency risk in accordance with the Group's financial risk management policy. The objective of the policy is to support the delivery of the Group's financial targets whilst protecting future financial security.
The main risks arising from the Group's financial instruments are interest rate risk, foreign currency risk, credit risk and liquidity risk. The Group uses different methods to measure and manage different types of risks to which it is exposed. These include monitoring levels of exposure to interest rate and foreign exchange risk and assessments of market forecasts for interest rate, foreign exchange and commodity prices. Ageing analyses and monitoring of specific credit allowances are undertaken to manage credit risk, liquidity risk is monitored through the development of future rolling cash flow forecasts.
The Board reviews and agrees policies for managing each of these risks as summarised below.
Primary responsibility for identification and control of financial risks rests with the Board. The Board reviews and agrees policies for managing each of the risks identified below, including the setting of limits for credit allowances and future cash flow forecast projections.
Risk Exposures and Responses
Interest rate risk
The Group's has no long-term debt obligations. The Group's exposure to market interest rates primarily relate to cash and cash equivalents.
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2008
Risk Exposures and Responses (continued)
At balance date, the Group had the following mix of financial assets and liabilities exposed to Australian Variable interest rate risk that are not designated in cash flow hedges:
| Consolidated | Parent | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |
| Financial Assets | ||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 1,592,840 | 2,611,219 | 1,328,816 | 2,315,359 |
| 1,592,840 | 2,611,219 | 1,328,816 | 2,315,359 |
Cash flow sensitivity analysis for variable rate instruments
A change of 100 basis points in interest rates at the reporting date would have increased (decreased) equity and profit or loss by the amounts shown below. The analysis is performed on the same basis for 2007.
| 2008 | Profit or Loss | Equity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash and cash equivalents | Carrying Value$1,592,840 | 100bpincrease$13,813 | 100bpdecrease$(13,813) | 100bpincrease$13,813 | 100bpdecrease$(13,813) | |
| Trade receivables | 47,941 | - | - | - | - | |
| Cash flow sensitivity (net) | 13,813 | (13,813) | 13,813 | (13,813) | ||
| 2007 | Profit or Loss | Equity | ||||
| Carrying Value$ | 100bpincrease$ | 100bpdecrease$ | 100bpincrease$ | 100bpdecrease$ | ||
| Cash and cash equivalents | ||||||
| Trade receivables | 2,611,219122,806 | 23,034- | (23,034)- | 23,034- | (23,034)- |
Foreign currency risk
As a result of operations in Egypt, the Group's balance sheet can be affected significantly by movements in the EGP/A$ exchange rates. The Group also has transactional currency exposures. Such exposure arises from sales or purchases by an operating entity in currencies other than the functional currency. Approximately 58% of costs are denominated in the unit's functional currency.
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2008
Risk Exposures and Responses (continued)
At 30 June 2008, the Group had the following exposure to foreign currency that is not designated in cash flow hedges:
| Consolidated | Parent | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |
| Financial Assets | ||||
| US$ | ||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 229,733 | 284,511 | - | - |
| EGP | ||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 34,291 | 11,347 | - | - |
| Trade and other receivables | - | 1,551 | - | - |
| GBP | ||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 1,120,056 | - | 1,120,056 | - |
| 1,384,080 | 297,409 | 1,120,056 | - | |
| Financial LiabilitiesUS$ | ||||
| Trade and other payablesEGP | 55,645 | 52,966 | - | - |
| Trade and other payablesEuro | 6,375 | 28,340 | - | - |
| Trade and other payablesGBP | 57,528 | 8,430 | - | - |
| Trade and other payables | 118,860 | - | 41,145 | |
| 238,408 | 89,736 | 41,145 | - | |
| Net exposure | 1,145,672 | 207,673 | 1,078,911 | - |
The following sensitivity is based on the foreign currency risk exposures in existence at the balance sheet date:
At 30 June 2008, had the Australian Dollar moved, as illustrated in the table below, with all other variables held constant, post tax profit and equity would have been affected as follows:
Judgements of reasonably possible movements:
| Post Tax Loss | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Higher)/Lower | Equity Higher/(Lower) | |||
| 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |
| $ | $ | $ | $ | |
| Consolidated | ||||
| AUD/EGP +10% | 561,219 | 637,183 | (1,650,637) | (630,467) |
| AUD/EGP -10% | (685,934) | (778,779) | 2,017,445 | 770,571 |
| Parent | ||||
| AUD/EGP +10% | - | - | - | - |
| AUD/EGP -10% | - | - | - | - |
The movements in equity in 2008 are more sensitive than in 2007 due to the higher level of EGP payables at balance date.
Management believe the balance date risk exposures are representative of the risk exposure inherent in the financial instruments.
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2008
Risk Exposures and Responses (continued)
Credit risk
Credit risk arises from the financial assets of the Group, which comprise cash and cash equivalents, and trade and other receivables. The Group's exposure to credit risk arises from potential default of the counter party, with a maximum exposure equal to the carrying amount of these instruments. Exposure at balance date is addressed in each applicable note.
The Group does not hold any credit derivatives to offset its credit exposure.
In addition, receivable balances are monitored on an ongoing basis with the result that the Group's exposure to bad debts is not significant.
There are no significant concentrations of credit risk within the Group.
Liquidity risk
The Group's objective is to maintain a continuity of funding to ensure sufficient working capital is available to meet the companies exploration and development commitments.
The table below reflects all contractually fixed pay-offs and receivables for settlement, repayments and interest resulting from recognised financial assets and liabilities as of 30 June 2008. The values presented are the respective undiscounted cash flows for the respective upcoming fiscal years. Cash flows for financial assets and liabilities without fixed amount or timing are based on the conditions existing at 30 June 2008.
The remaining contractual maturities of the Group's and parent entity's financial liabilities are:
| 2007 | |
|---|---|
| 201,514 | |
| - | |
| - | |
| - | |
| 201,514 | |
Maturity analysis of financial assets and liability based on management's expectation.
The risk implied from the values shown in the table below, reflects a balanced view of cash inflows and outflows. These assets are considered in the Group's overall liquidity risk. To monitor existing financial assets and liabilities as well as to enable an effective controlling of future risks.
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2008
Risk Exposures and Responses (continued)
| ø6months | 6-12months | 1-5years | >5years | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year ended 30 June 2008 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
| Consolidated FinancialAssets | |||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 1,592,840 | - | - | - | 1,592,840 |
| Trade and other receivables | 47,941 | - | - | - | 47,941 |
| 1,640,781 | - | - | - | 1,640,781 | |
| Consolidated FinancialLiabilities | |||||
| Trade and other payables | 799,863 | - | - | - | 799,863 |
| 799,863 | - | - | - | 799,863 | |
| Net maturity | 840,918 | - | - | - | 840,918 |
| ø6 | 6-12 | 1-5 | >5 | ||
| months | months | years | years | Total | |
| Year ended 30 June 2008 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
| Parent Financial Assets | |||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 1,328,816 | - | - | - | 1,328,816 |
| Trade and other receivables | 47,941 | - | - | - | 47,941 |
| 1,376,757 | - | - | - | 1,376,757 | |
| Parent Financial Liabilities | |||||
| Trade and other payables | 150,622 | - | - | - | 150,622 |
| 150,622 | - | - | - | 150,622 | |
| Net maturity | 1,226,135 | - | - | - | 1,226,135 |
| ø6months | 6-12months | 1-5years | >5years | Total | |
| Year ended 30 June 2007 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
| Consolidated FinancialAssets | |||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 2,611,219 | - | - | - | 2,611,219 |
| Trade and other receivables | 122,806 | - | - | - | 122,806 |
| 2,734,025 | - | - | - | 2,734,025 | |
| Consolidated FinancialLiabilities | |||||
| Trade and other payables | 458,177 | - | - | - | 458,177 |
| 458,177 | - | - | - | 458,177 | |
| Net maturity | 2,275,848 | - | - | - | 2,275,848 |
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2008
| Year ended 30 June 2007 | ø6months$ | 6-12months$ | 1-5years$ | >5years$ | Total$ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parent Financial Assets | |||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 2,315,359 | - | - | - | 2,315,359 |
| Trade and other receivables | 121,255 | - | - | - | 121,255 |
| 2,436,614 | - | - | - | 2,436,614 | |
| Parent Financial Liabilities | |||||
| Trade and other payables | 201,514 | - | - | - | 201,514 |
| 201,514 | - | - | - | 201,514 | |
| Net maturity | 2,235,100 | - | - | - | 2,235,100 |
3 REVERSAL OF IMPAIRMENT LOSS
In the current period, the company has reversed the exploration and evaluation impairment losses previously recognised amounting to $2,184,129 in relation to the Abu Dabbab tantalite, tin and feldspar project.
The main events and circumstances that led to the reversal of these impairment losses are as follows:
- ' A 10 year off take agreement was signed with the German company HC Starck GmbH for the supply of 600,000 pounds of tantalum per annum.
- ' Bankable Feasibility Study on the Abu Dabbab project has been completed.
- ' Detailed negotiations with the Kfw German Bank to secure the debt portion of the project finance have commenced. The bank is continuing with its due diligence process.
- ' An in fill drilling program at Abu Dabbab has been completed resulting in an increase in the project reserves.
- ' A major equity raising is planned following the completion of the bank due diligence.
4 SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Group's primary reporting format is business segments and its secondary format is geographical segments.
The operating businesses are organised and managed separately according to the nature of the products and services provided, with each segment representing a strategic business unit that offers different products and serves different markets.
Transfer prices between business segments are set at an arms length basis in a manner similar to transactions with third parties.
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2008
4 SEGMENT INFORMATION (continued)
Business segments
The following tables present revenue and profit information and certain asset and liability information regarding business segments for the years ended 30 June 2008 and 2007.
| TantalumGoldCorporate$$$$Year ended 30 June 2008RevenueOther revenues from externalcustomers1,9661,42577,48980,880Inter-segment sales-23,934-23,934Total segment revenue1,96625,35977,489104,814Inter-segment elimination(23,934)Total consolidated revenue80,880ResultSegment result(679,232)1,995,3752,108,9903,425,133Loss before income tax andminority interest3,425,133Income tax expense-Net loss for the year3,425,133Assets and liabilitiesSegment assets3,215,400296,8281,480,0614,992,289Total assets4,992,289Segment liabilities465,755220,571171,865858,191Total liabilities858,191Other segment informationCapital expenditure7,967-2,33310,300Depreciation13,86834,26822,21770,353Impairment losses-1,109,807-1,109,807Reversal of impairment2,184,129--2,184,129 | Continuing Operations | TotalOperations | |
|---|---|---|---|
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2008
4 SEGMENT INFORMATION (continued)
| Continuing Operations | TotalOperations | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tantalum | Gold | Corporate | ||
| Year ended 30 June 2007 | ||||
| Revenue | ||||
| Other revenues from externalcustomers | - | 8,269 | 127,161 | 135,430 |
| Total segment revenue | - | 8,269 | 127,161 | 135,430 |
| Inter-segment elimination | - | |||
| Total consolidated revenue | 135,430 | |||
| Result | ||||
| Segment result | 825,198 | 1,862,473 | 1,503,548 | 4,191,219 |
| Loss before income tax andminority interestIncome tax expense | 4,191,219- | |||
| Net profit for the year | 4,191,219 | |||
| Assets and liabilities | ||||
| Segment assets | 235,388 | 128,793 | 2,544,282 | 2,908,463 |
| Total assets | 2,908,463 | |||
| Segment liabilities | 58,578 | 224,910 | 212,990 | 496,478 |
| Total liabilities | 496,478 | |||
| Other segment information | ||||
| Capital expenditure | - | 66,635 | 93,707 | 160,342 |
| Depreciation | - | 17,583 | 23,536 | 41,119 |
| Impairment losses | 742,670 | 1,493,894 | - | 2,235,564 |
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2008
4 SEGMENT INFORMATION (continued)
Geographical segments
The Group's geographical segments are determined by the location of the Group's assets and operations.
The following tables present revenue, expenditure and certain asset information regarding geographical segments for the years ended 30 June 2008 and 2007
| Australia | Egypt | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Year ended 30 June 2008 | |||
| RevenueOther revenues from external customersLessrevenueattributabletodiscontinuedoperation | 77,490- | 3,390- | 80,880- |
| Revenue from continuing operationsInter-segment sales | 77,490- | 3,390- | 80,880- |
| Segment revenue | 77,490 | 3,390 | 80,880 |
| Other segment informationSegment assetsTotal assets | 1,480,061 | 3,512,228 | 4,992,2894,992,289 |
| Capital expenditure | 2,333 | 7,967 | 10,300 |
| Year ended 30 June 2007RevenueOther revenues from external customersLessrevenueattributabletodiscontinuedoperation | 127,161- | 8,269- | 135,430- |
| Revenue from continuing operationsInter-segment sales | 127,161- | 8,269- | 135,430- |
| Segment revenue | 127,161 | 8,269 | 135,430 |
| Other segment informationSegment assetsTotal assets | 2,544,282 | 364,181 | 2,908,4632,908,463 |
| Capital expenditure | 93,707 | 66,635 | 160,342 |
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2008
5 REVENUES AND EXPENSES
| CONSOLIDATED | PARENT | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||
| $ | $ | $ | $ | ||
| (a) Other income | |||||
| Other income | 3,338 | 10,168 | 1,835 | 1,935 | |
| 3,338 | 10,168 | 1,835 | 1,935 | ||
| (b) Finance (costs) / income | |||||
| Bank loans and overdrafts | (3,566) | (65) | (56) | (65) | |
| Total finance costs | (3,566) | (65) | (56) | (65) | |
| Bank interest receivable | 77,542 | 125,262 | 74,152 | 125,226 | |
| Total finance income | 77,542 | 125,262 | 74,152 | 125,226 | |
| income statement | (c) Lease payments and other expenses included in | ||||
| Option expense | Included in administrative expenses:Minimum lease payments - operating leaseConsultancy expense | 123,328193,600140,953 | 63,44960,975117,169 | 106,654193,60057,405 | 55,42560,975105,202 |
| (d) Employee benefits expense | |||||
| Wages and Salaries | Superannuation costsExpense of share-based payments | 1,217,38029,721- | 589,55421,40360,975 | 778,91628,069- | 496,99621,40360,975 |
| 1,247,101 | 671,932 | 806,985 | 579,374 |
6 INCOME TAX
Major components of income tax expense for the years ended 30 June 2008 and 2007 are:
Income Statement
| Current income | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current income tax charge | - | - | - | - |
| Adjustments in respect of current income tax of | ||||
| previous years | - | - | - | - |
| Deferred income tax | ||||
| Relating to origination and reversal of | ||||
| temporary differences | - | - | - | - |
| Benefit from previously unrecognised tax loss | ||||
| used to reduce deferred tax expense | - | - | - | - |
| Income tax expense reported in income statement | - | - | - | - |
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2008
6 INCOME TAX (continued)
| CONSOLIDATED | PARENT | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |
| $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | |
| Statement of changes in equity | ||||
| Deferred income tax | ||||
| Capital raising costs | - | - | - | - |
| Income tax expense reported in equity | - | - | - | - |
A reconciliation of income tax expense (benefit) applicable to accounting profit before income tax at the statutory income tax rate to income tax expense at the Group's effective income tax rate for the years ended 30 June 2008 and 2007 is as follows:
| Accounting profit (loss) before tax fromcontinuing operationsLoss before tax from discontinued operations | (3,425,133)- | (4,191,218)- | (5,330,027)- | (4,271,808)- |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accounting profit (loss) before income tax | (3,425,133) | (4,191,218) | (5,330,027) | (4,271,808) |
| At the statutory income tax rate of 30%(2007: 30%)Provision for non-recovery of loans | (1,027,540)- | (1,257,366)832,071 | (1,599,008)- | (1,281,542)832,071 |
| Exploration expenditure incurred in relationto a foreign permanent establishmentNon-deductible expensesTemporary differences not recognised | 17,85562,389947,296 | 10,21873,918341,159 | 17,85562,3891,518,764 | 10,21873,918365,335 |
| Income tax expense | - | - | - | - |
| Income tax expense reported in incomestatementIncome tax attributable to discontinuedoperation | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Effective income tax rate | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2008
6 INCOME TAX (continued)
| CONSOLIDATED | PARENT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 |
| $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | $'000 |
Unrecognised deferred tax assets and liabilities
Deferred tax assets and liabilities have not been recognised in respect of the following items:
| Interest receivable | - | (864) | - | (864) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business related costs | 105,744 | 125,382 | 105,744 | 125,382 |
| Accrued superannuation | - | 523 | - | 523 |
| Accrued audit fees | 8,724 | 6,000 | 4,989 | 6,000 |
| Accrued directors fees | - | 5,000 | - | 5,000 |
| Employee entitlements | 6,373 | 4,665 | 6,373 | 3,443 |
| Borrowing costs | 1,454 | 2,181 | 1,454 | 2,181 |
| Foreign exchange | 110,695 | 12,078 | 1,557 | 11,118 |
| Tax losses (domestic) | 3,321,947 | 2,699,047 | 2,704,603 | 2,097,658 |
| Trade and other receivables | - | - | 4,062,664 | 3,096,804 |
| Potential unrecognised tax benefit @ 30% | 3,554,937 | 2,854,012 | 6,887,384 | 5,347,245 |
The deductible temporary differences and tax losses do not expire under current legislation. Deferred tax assets have not been recognised in respect of these items because it is not probable that future taxable profit will be available against which the company can utilise benefits.
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2008
7 EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings per share amounts are calculated by dividing net profit for the year attributable to ordinary equity holders of the parent by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the year.
Diluted earnings per share amounts are calculated by dividing the net profit attributable to ordinary shareholders (after deducting interest on the convertible redeemable preference shares) by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the year (adjusted for the effects of dilutive options and dilutive convertible non-cumulative redeemable preference shares).
The following reflects the income and share data used in the total operations basic and diluted earnings per share computations:
| CONSOLIDATED | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | |
| $ | $ | |
| Net loss attributable to ordinary shareholders for diluted earningsper share | (3,425,133) | (4,191,218) |
| Shares | Shares | |
| Weighted average number of ordinary shares for basic earnings pershare | 276,638,760 | 237,310,914 |
| Adjusted weighted average number of ordinary shares for dilutedearnings per share | 276,638,760 | 237,310,914 |
The consolidated entity's options over ordinary shares could potentially dilute basic earnings per share in the future, however they have been excluded from the calculations of diluted earnings per share because they are anti-dilutive for the years presented.
There have been no other transactions involving ordinary shares or potential ordinary shares since the reporting date and before the completion of these financial statements.
To calculate earnings per share, the weighted average number of ordinary shares for both basic and diluted is as per the table above. The following table provides the profit figure used as the numerator:
| 2008cents | 2007cents | |
|---|---|---|
| Net loss attributable to ordinary shareholders from discontinuedoperations: | ||
| - for basic earnings per share | (1.24) | (1.77) |
| - for diluted earnings per share | (1.24) | (1.77) |
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2008
8 CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
| CONSOLIDATED | PARENT | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |
| $ | $ | $ | $ | |
| Cash at bank and in handShort term deposits | 1,551,51641,324 | 338,3622,272,857 | 1,328,816- | 42,5022,272,857 |
| 1,592,840 | 2,611,219 | 1,328,816 | 2,315,359 | |
| Cash at bank and in hand earns interest | ||||
| at floating rates based on daily bankrates. | ||||
| Short-term deposits are made for varying | ||||
| periods of between one day and onemonth depending on the immediate cash | ||||
| requirements of the Group, and earn | ||||
| interestattherespectiveshort-term | ||||
| deposit rates. | ||||
| The fair value of cash and cashequivalents is $1,592,840 (2007: | ||||
| $2,611,219). | ||||
| Reconciliation of cashFor the purposes of the Cash Flow | ||||
| Statement, cash and cash equivalents | ||||
| comprise the following at 30 June: | ||||
| Cash at bank and in hand | 1,551,516 | 338,362 | 1,328,816 | 42,502 |
| Short-term deposits | 41,324 | 2,272,857 | - | 2,272,857 |
| 1,592,840 | 2,611,219 | 1,328,816 | 2,325,359 | |
| Reconciliation from the net profit after | ||||
| tax to the net cash flows from | ||||
| operations | ||||
| Net Loss | (3,425,133) | (4,191,218) | (5,330,026) | (4,271,808) |
| Adjustments for: | ||||
| Depreciation and amortisationImpairment losses | 70,353(802,869) | 41,1192,236,564 | 22,2163,219,535 | 23,5362,768,260 |
| Expenses capitalised | (104,892) | - | - | - |
| Foreign exchange loss (gain) | 935,947 | 53,429 | 5,189 | 38,262 |
| Interest receivedShare options expensed | (80,423)193,600 | (132,549)60,975 | (77,032)193,600 | (124,280)60,975 |
| Changes in assets and liabilities | ||||
| (increase)/decrease in trade and otherreceivables | 74,864 | (73,594) | 73,314 | (72,042) |
| (increase)/decrease in prepayments | (26,565) | (18,614) | (15,521) | (18,615) |
| (decrease)/increase in provisions | 20,027 | 13,378 | 9,767 | (13,447) |
| (decrease)/increase in trade and otherpayables | 230,121 | 450,678 | (50,892) | (6,595) |
| Net cash from operating activities | (2,914,970) | (1,559,832) | (1,949,850) | (1,615,754) |
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2008
9 TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES (CURRENT)
| CONSOLIDATED | PARENT | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |
| $ | $ | $ | $ | |
| Trade receivables | 47,941 | 122,806 | 47,941 | 121,255 |
Trade receivables are non-interest bearing and are generally on 60-day terms.
At 30 June, the ageing analysis of trade receivables is as follows:
| Total | 0-30Days | 31-60Days | 61-90DaysPDNI* | 61-90DaysCI* | +91DaysPDNI* | +91DaysCI* | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | Consolidated | 47,941 | 47,941 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Parent | 47,941 | 47,941 | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 2007 | Consolidated | 122,806 | 122,806 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Parent | 121,255 | 121,255 | - | - | - | - | - |
* Past due not impaired ('PDNI') Considered impaired ('CI')
The balances within trade and other receivables do not contain impaired assets and are not past due. It is expected that these other balances will be received when due.
(a) Fair value and credit risk
Due to the short term nature of these receivables, their carrying value is assumed to approximate their fair value.
The maximum exposure to credit risk is the fair value of receivables. Collateral is not held as security, nor is it the Group's policy to transfer (on-sell) receivables to special purpose entities.
(b) Foreign exchange and interest rate risk
Detail regarding foreign exchange and interest rate risk exposure is disclosed in note 2 (v).
10 OTHER FINANCIAL ASSETS (NON-CURRENT)
| CONSOLIDATED | PARENT | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |
| $ | $ | $ | $ | |
| Loans receivable from controlled entities (a) | - | - | 13,542,214 | 10,322,679 |
| Provision for impairment of receivables | - | - | (13,542,214) | (10,322,679) |
| Investments in controlled entities (note 18) | - | - | 27,688 | 305 |
| 27,688 | 305 |
The impairment of loans to subsidiaries was $3,219,534 (2007: $ 2,768,260).
All amounts are receivable in Australian Dollars.
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2008
10 OTHER FINANCIAL ASSETS (NON CURRENT) (Continued)
(a) Loans receivable from controlled entities
The loans to controlled entities are advanced interest free, are unsecured and will be repaid when the respective subsidiary is generating sufficient funds and has the financial capacity to meet the loan commitment.
(b) Fair values
The fair values and carrying values of non-current receivables of the Group are as follows:
| Consolidated | Parent | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20082007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||
| $000 | $000 | $000 | $000 | |
| Loan receivables | - | - | - | - |
(c) Interest rate risk
Details regarding interest rate risk exposure are disclosed in note 2 (v).
(d) Credit risk
The maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting date is the higher of the carrying value and fair value of each class of receivables. No collateral is held as security.
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2008
11 PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
| CONSOLIDATED | PARENT | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leasehold | Plant and | Leasehold | |||||
| Improvements$ | equipment$ | Total$ | Improvements$ | equipment$ | Total$ | ||
| Year ended | |||||||
| 30 June | |||||||
| 2008 | |||||||
| At 1 July | |||||||
| 2007,Net of | |||||||
| accumulated | |||||||
| depreciation | 31,055 | 123,853 | 154,908 | 16,552 | 71,584 | 88,136 | |
| Additions | - | 10,300 | 10,300 | - | 2,333 | 2,333 | |
| Disposals | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| TransfersDepreciation | (14,503) | 119,395 | 104,892 | - | - | - | |
| charge for | |||||||
| the year | (3,650) | (66,703) | (70,353) | (3,650) | (18,566) | (22,216) | |
| At 30 June | |||||||
| 2008, | |||||||
| Net ofaccumulated | |||||||
| depreciation | 12,902 | 186,845 | 199,747 | 12,902 | 55,351 | 68,253 | |
| At 1 July | |||||||
| 2007 | |||||||
| Cost or fairvalue | 33,385 | 225,697 | 259,082 | 18,251 | 143,379 | 161,630 | |
| Accumulated | |||||||
| depreciation | |||||||
| and | |||||||
| impairmentNet carrying | (2,330) | (101,844) | (104,174) | (1,699) | (71,795) | (73,494) | |
| amount | 31,055 | 123,853 | 154,908 | 16,552 | 71,584 | 88,136 | |
| At 30 June | |||||||
| 2008Cost or fair | |||||||
| value | 18,251 | 316,165 | 334,416 | 18,251 | 110,104 | 128,355 | |
| Accumulated | |||||||
| depreciation | |||||||
| andimpairment | (5,349) | (129,320) | (134,669) | (5,349) | (54,753) | (60,102) | |
| Net carrying | |||||||
| amount | 12,902 | 186,845 | 199,747 | 12,902 | 55,351 | 68,253 |
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2008
11 PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT (continued)
| CONSOLIDATED | PARENT | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leasehold | Plant and | LeaseholdPlant and | ||||||
| Improvements | equipment | Total | Improvements | equipment | Total | |||
| $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||
| Year ended | ||||||||
| 30 June | ||||||||
| 2007At 1 July | ||||||||
| 2006, | ||||||||
| Net of | ||||||||
| accumulated | ||||||||
| depreciation | - | 35,685 | 35,685 | - | 35,685 | 35,685 | ||
| Additions | 33,385 | 126,957 | 160,342 | 18,251 | 75,456 | 93,707 | ||
| Transfers | - | - | - | - | (17,720) | (17,720) | ||
| Depreciation | ||||||||
| charge for | ||||||||
| the yearAt 30 June | (2,330) | (38,789) | (41,119) | (1,699) | (21,837) | (23,536) | ||
| 2007, | ||||||||
| Net of | ||||||||
| accumulated | ||||||||
| depreciation | 31,055 | 123,853 | 154,908 | 16,552 | 71,584 | 88,136 | ||
| At 1 July | ||||||||
| 2006 | ||||||||
| Cost or fair | ||||||||
| value | - | 195,502 | 195,502 | - | 195,502 | 195,502 | ||
| Accumulateddepreciation | ||||||||
| and | ||||||||
| impairment | - | (159,817) | (159,817) | - | (159,817) | (159,817) | ||
| Net carrying | ||||||||
| amount | - | 35,685 | 35,685 | - | 35,685 | 35,685 | ||
| At 30 June | ||||||||
| 2007 | ||||||||
| Cost or fairvalue | 33,385 | 225,697 | 259,082 | 18,251 | 143,379 | 161,630 | ||
| Accumulated | ||||||||
| depreciation | ||||||||
| and | ||||||||
| impairment | (2,330) | (101,844) | (104,174) | (1,699) | (71,795) | (73,494) | ||
| Net carrying | ||||||||
| amount | 31,055 | 123,853 | 154,908 | 16,552 | 71,584 | 88,136 |
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2008
12 EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION EXPENDITURE
| CONSOLIDATED | PARENT | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evaluationexpenditure$ | Explorationcosts$ | Total | Evaluationexpenditure$ | Explorationcosts$ | Total$ | ||
| Year ended 30 June2008At 1 July 2007,net of accumulatedamortisation | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| AdditionsImpairmentExchange adjustment | 1,204,3582,184,129(282,821) | 1,064,693(1,109,807)45,114 | 2,269,0511,074,322(237,707) | --- | --- | --- | |
| At 30 June 2008,net of accumulatedamortisation | 3,105,666 | - | 3,105,666 | - | - | - | |
| At 1 July 2007Cost (gross carryingamount)Accumulated amortisation | 3,784,660 | 2,809,451 | 6,594,111 | - | - | - | |
| and impairmentNet carrying amount | (3,784,660)- | (2,809,451)- | (6,594,111)- | -- | -- | -- | |
| At 30 June 2008Cost (gross carryingamount)Accumulated amortisation | 3,105,666 | 3,664,199 | 6,769,865 | - | - | - | |
| and impairmentNet carrying amount | -3,105,666 | (3,664,199)- | (3,664,199)3,105,666 | -- | -- | -- | |
For the year ended 30 June 2008, evaluation expenditure is capitalised at cost. This project cost will be amortised over the life of the Abu Dabbab operation once production has commenced.
This asset is tested for impairment where an indicator of impairment arises.
The exploration costs represent the expenditure on the Wadi Allaqi leases in Egypt.
The exploration asset has been impaired because, at this stage of the project, there is insufficient resource to justify a project and hence the recovery of the asset.
The impairment loss of $1,109,807 was charged in the 2008 financial year. A previous impairment on the Abu Dabbab project was reversed as per note 3.
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2008
13 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
(a) Key management personnel
Names and positions held of economic and parent entity key management personnel in office at any time during the financial year are:
| Key Management Person | Position |
|---|---|
| Mr RJ Telford | Chairman – Executive |
| Dr JM Chisholm | Director – Executive |
| Mr JSF Dunlop | Director – Non-executive |
| Mr JD Kenny | Director – Non-executive |
| Mr J Starink | Director – Executive |
| Mr PR Sims | Chief Financial Officer |
| Mr RS Caren | Company Secretary |
Key management personnel remuneration has been included in the Remuneration Report section of the Directors Report.
(b) Options and Rights Holdings
The Group had an option plan for the granting of non-transferable options to certain directors and senior executives.
The relevant terms and conditions applicable to options granted under the option plan include:
(a) The exercise price of the options was set at a agreed price at the date of granting the options; (b) Any options that are unvested on the 31 December 2007 lapsed.
On 30 June 2008, Nil (2007: 15,568,322) options were held by key management personnel.
Number of Options held by Key Management Personnel
| Balance | Granted as | Options | Options | Balance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.7.2007 | Compensation | Exercised | Lapsed | 30.6.2008 | |
| Mr RJ Telford | 6,558,322 | - | 6,558,322 | - | - |
| Dr JM Chisholm | 2,260,000 | - | 2,260,000 | - | - |
| Mr JSF Dunlop | 2,250,000 | - | - | 2,250,000 | - |
| Mr JD Kenny | 2,250,000 | - | 2,250,000 | - | - |
| Mr J Starink | - | - | - | - | - |
| Mr PR Sims | 2,250,000 | - | - | 2,250,000 | - |
| Mr RS Caren | - | - | - | - | - |
| 15,568,322 | - | 11,068,322 | 4,500,000 | - |
| Balance | Granted as | Options | Options | Balance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.7.2006 | Compensation | Exercised | Lapsed | 30.6.2007 | |
| Mr RJ Telford | 6,558,322 | - | - | - | 6,558,322 |
| Dr JM Chisholm | 2,260,000 | - | - | - | 2,260,000 |
| Mr JSF Dunlop | 2,250,000 | - | - | - | 2,250,000 |
| Mr JD Kenny | 2,250,000 | - | - | - | 2,250,000 |
| Mr J Starink | - | - | - | - | - |
| Mr PR Sims | - | 2,250,000 | - | - | 2,250,000 |
| Mr RS Caren | - | - | - | - | - |
| 13,318,322 | 2,250,000 | - | - | 15,568,322 |
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2008
13 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS (continued)
(c) Shareholdings
Number of Shares held by Key Management Personnel
| Balance1.7.2007 | Received asCompensation | OptionsExercised | NetChangeOther* | Balance30.6.2008 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mr RJ Telford | 13,568,124 | - | 6,558,322 | - | 20,126,446 |
| Dr JM Chisholm | 160,000 | - | 2,260,000 | - | 2,420,000 |
| Mr JSF Dunlop | - | - | - | - | - |
| Mr JD Kenny | - | - | 2,250,000 | - | 2,250,000 |
| Mr J Starink | - | - | - | 300,000 | 300,000 |
| Mr PR Sims | - | - | - | - | - |
| Mr RS Caren | - | - | - | - | - |
| 13,728,124 | - | 11,068,322 | 300,000 | 25,096,446 | |
| Balance | Received as | Options | Net | Balance | |
| 1.7.2006 | Compensation | Exercised | ChangeOther* | 30.6.2007 | |
| Mr RJ Telford | 13,568,124 | - | - | - | 13,568,124 |
| Dr JM Chisholm | 60,000 | - | - | 100,000 | 160,000 |
| Mr JSF Dunlop | - | - | - | - | - |
| Mr JD Kenny | - | - | - | - | - |
| Mr J Starink | - | - | - | - | - |
| Mr PR Sims | - | - | - | - | - |
| Mr RS Caren | - | - | - | - | - |
| 13,628,124 | - | - | 100,000 | 13,728,124 |
* Net change refers to shares purchased or sold during the financial year.
14 TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES (CURRENT)
| CONSOLIDATED | PARENT | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008$ | 2007$ | 2008$ | 2007$ | |
| Other payablesRelated party payables ( b) : | 799,863 | 396,193 | 150,622 | 139,530 |
| Other related parties | - | 61,984 | - | 61,984 |
| 799,863 | 458,177 | 150,622 | 201,514 |
(a) Fair value
Due to the short term nature of these payables, their carrying value is assumed to approximate their fair value.
(b) Related party payables
For terms and conditions relating to related party payables refer to note 18.
(c) Interest rate, foreign exchange and liquidity risk
Information regarding interest rate, foreign exchange and liquidity risk exposure is set out in note 2(v).
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2008
15 PROVISIONS
| Annual leave | Total | |
|---|---|---|
| $ | $ | |
| CONSOLIDATED | ||
| At 1 July 2007 | 38,301 | 38,301 |
| Arising during the year | 35,823 | 35,823 |
| Utilised | (15,796) | (15,796) |
| At 30 June 2008 | 58,328 | 58,328 |
| Current 2008 | 58,328 | 58,328 |
| Non-current 2008 | - | - |
| 58,328 | 58,328 | |
| Current 2007 | 38,301 | 38,301 |
| Non-current 2007 | - | - |
| 38,301 | 38,301 | |
| PARENT | ||
| At 1 July 2007 | 11,476 | 11,476 |
| Arising during the year | 25,324 | 25,324 |
| Utilised | (15,557) | (15,557) |
| At 30 June 2008 | 21,243 | 21,243 |
| Current 2008 | 21,243 | 21,243 |
| Non-current 2008 | - | - |
| 21,243 | 21,243 | |
| Current 2007 | 11,476 | 11,476 |
| Non-current 2007 | - | - |
| 11,476 | 11,476 |
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2008
16 ISSUED CAPITAL AND RESERVES
| CONSOLIDATED | PARENT | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |
| $ | $ | $ | $ | |
| Ordinary Shares | ||||
| Issued and fully paid | 29,550,495 | 25,409,780 | 29,550,495 | 25,409,780 |
| CONSOLIDATED | PARENT | |||
| Shares | $ | Shares | $ | |
| Movement in ordinary shares on theissue | ||||
| At 1 July 2006 | 232,851,926 | 22,658,274 | 232,851,926 | 22,658,274 |
| Issued on 7 February 2007 for cash | ||||
| on exercise of share options at 9 | ||||
| cents each | 6,000 | 540 | 6,000 | 540 |
| Issued on 1 May 2007 for cash at | ||||
| 10.9 cents each | 26,666,666 | 2,895,754 | 26,666,666 | 2,895,754 |
| Issue costs associated with capital | ||||
| raising | - | (144,788) | - | (144,788) |
| At 1 July 2007 | 259,524,592 | 25,409,780 | 259,524,592 | 25,409,780 |
| Issued on 31 December 2007 for | ||||
| cash on exercise of share options at 9 | ||||
| cents each | 33,674,180 | 3,030,676 | 33,674,180 | 3,030,676 |
| Issued on 26 February 2008 in | ||||
| accordance with an employment | ||||
| contract for nil consideration | 500,000 | - | 500,000 | - |
| Issued on 27 June 2008 for cash at | ||||
| 9.3 cents each | 12,655,553 | 1,181,290 | 12,655,553 | 1,181,290 |
| Issue costs associated with capitalraising | - | (71,251) | - | (71,251) |
| At 30 June 2008 | 306,354,325 | 29,550,495 | 306,354,325 | 29,550,495 |
| Options | ||||
| 2008 | 2008 | 2007 | 2007 | |
| Number | WAEP | Number | WAEP | |
| Outstanding at the beginning of the year | 83,232,393 | 0.11 | 80,988,393 | 0.11 |
| Granted during the year | 4,000,000 | 0.16 | 2,250,000 | 0.15 |
| Exercised during the year | (33,674,180) | (0.09) | (6,000) | (0.09) |
| Expired during the year | (24,558,213) | (0.10) | - | - |
| Outstanding at the end of the year | 29,000,000 | 0.14 | 83,232,393 | 0.11 |
* WAEP refers to weighted average exercise price
(a) Capital management
The Board's policy is to maintain a strong capital base so as to maintain investor, creditor and market confidence and to sustain future development of the business.
There were no changes in the Group's approach to capital management during the year.
Neither the company nor any of its subsidiaries are subject to externally imposed capital requirements.
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2008
16 ISSUED CAPITAL AND RESERVES (continued)
(b) Share-based payments
On 5 February 2008, the company stockbrokers Fox Davies Holdings Limited and Seymour Pierce Limited were granted 2,000,000 options each with an exercise price of £0.07 on or before 15 December 2011.
Using the Binomial Tree option valuation, the fair value of the options was calculated. The model takes into account share price volatilities and the risk that the company is not listed. The following inputs were used:
| Strike price | A$ 0.15 |
|---|---|
| Stock price | A$ 0.10 |
| Valuation date | 05/02/2008 |
| Expiry date | 15/12/2011 |
| Volatility | 70% |
| Risk free rate | 6.75% |
| Value per option | A$ 0.0484 |
| Number of options | 4,000,000 |
| Value of options | A$ 193,600 |
The value of options issued was fully expensed at 30 June 2008.
Other Reserves
| CONSOLIDATEDForeign | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Optionreserve | currencytranslation | Total | Optionreserve | Foreigncurrencytranslation | Total | |
| $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |
| At 1 July 2006Share based | 77,827 | - | 77,827 | 77,827 | - | 77,827 |
| payment | 60,975 | - | 60,975 | 60,975 | - | 60,975 |
| At 30 June 2007Currencytranslation | 138,802 | - | 138,802 | 138,802 | - | 138,802 |
| differencesShare based | - | 812,931 | 812,931 | - | - | - |
| payment | 193,600 | - | 193,600 | 193,600 | - | 193,600 |
| As at 30 June2008 | 332,402 | 812,931 | 1,145,333 | 332,402 | - | 332,402 |
Nature and purpose of reserves
Option reserve
The option reserve is used to record items recognised as expenses on valuation of share options.
Foreign currency translation reserve
The foreign currency translation reserve is used to record exchange differences arising from the translation of the financial statements of foreign subsidiaries. It is also used to record the net investment hedged in these subsidiaries.
17 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Operating lease commitments - Group as lessee
The Group has entered into commercial leases for office accommodation in Perth, Australia and Cairo Egypt.
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2008
17 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)
Perth Office Lease
The property lease is a non-cancellable lease with a five year term, with rent payable monthly in advance. Contingent rental provisions within the lease agreement require the minimum lease payments shall be increased by the lower of CPI or 5% per annum. An option exists to renew the lease at the end of the five year term for an additional five years.
Cairo Office Lease
The property lease is a non-cancellable lease with a two year term, with rent payable monthly in advance.
Operating Lease Commitments
| CONSOLIDATED | PARENT | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |
| $ | $ | $ | $ | |
| Within one year | 140,925 | 114,612 | 123,704 | 96,000 |
| After one year but not more than five years | 281,327 | 328,282 | 281,327 | 314,323 |
| More than five years | - | - | - | - |
| 422,252 | 442,894 | 405,031 | 410,323 |
Capital commitments
There were no capital commitments at reporting date.
18 RELATED PARTY DISCLOSURE
The consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of Gippsland Limited and the subsidiaries listed in the following table:
| Country of | Equity interest (%) | Investment ($) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| incorporation | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |
| Abutan Pty Ltd | Australia | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Tantalum International Pty Ltd | Australia | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Here2win.com Pty Ltd | Australia | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Nubian Resources plc | United Kingdom | 100 | 100 | 27,388 | 5 |
| Tantalum Egypt JSC | Egypt | 50 | 50 | - | - |
| Nubian Resources JSC | Egypt | 100 | - | - | - |
| 27,688 | 305 |
Gippsland Limited is the ultimate Australian parent entity and ultimate parent of the Group.
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2008
18 RELATED PARTY DISCLOSURE (Continued)
The following table provides the total amount of transactions which have been entered into with related parties for the relevant financial year:
| CONSOLIDATED | PARENT | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |
| $ | $ | $ | $ | |
| Eco International Pty Ltd – a | ||||
| company controlled by Mr RJ Telford | ||||
| received management fees. | 260,211 | 207,069 | 260,211 | 207,069 |
| Mandu Pty Ltd – a company | ||||
| controlled by Dr JM Chisholm | ||||
| received geological consulting fees. | 237,500 | 211,054 | 237,500 | 211,054 |
| John S Dunlop and Associates Pty | ||||
| Ltd – a company controlled by Mr | ||||
| JSF Dunlop received directors and | ||||
| mining consulting fees. | 60,412 | 45,640 | 60,412 | 45,640 |
| Ventureworks Pty Ltd – a company | ||||
| controlled by Mr JD Kenny received | ||||
| director's fees. | 38,750 | 38,333 | 38,750 | 38,333 |
| The parent entity, Gippsland Limited, | ||||
| has made loans to its controlled | ||||
| entities. These loans are interest | ||||
| free, unsecured and at call. | - | - | 3,219,535 | 7,054,347 |
19 EVENTS AFTER THE BALANCE SHEET DATE
On 25 July 2008, Gippsland Limited ("Gippsland") and Stellar Resources Limited ("Columbus") announced that they will merge their respective interests in the Tasmanian Heemksirk Tin project (formerly known as the Zeehan Tin project) into Stellar's subsidiary Columbus Metals Limited
("Columbus"). The agreement is conditional upon Columbus raising a minimum of A$10 million and being admitted to the official list of the ASX on or before 31 December 2008.
Gippsland will be issued with 15 million A$0.25 fully paid ordinary shares or the same number of shares that Stellar will hold in Columbus at the time of its admission to the official list of the ASX, if that number is greater than 15 million shares. Upon listing, Columbus will also invite a nominee from Gippsland to join the board of Columbus as a non-executive director.
No other matters or circumstances have arisen since the end of the financial year which significantly affected or may significantly affect the operations of the consolidated entity, the results of those operations, or the state of affairs of the consolidated entity in future financial years.
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2008
20 AUDITORS' REMUNERATION
| CONSOLIDATED | PARENT | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008$ | 2007$ | 2008$ | 2007$ | |
| Amounts received or due and receivable by PKFAustralia for: | ||||
| •an audit or review of the financial report of theentity and any other entity in the consolidated | ||||
| entity•other services in relation to the entity and anyother entity in the consolidated entity | 42,834 | - | 42,834 | - |
| (a) tax compliance | 2,992 | - | 500 | - |
| (b) corporate advisory fees | 22,697 | - | 10,902 | - |
| 68,523 | - | 54,236 | - | |
| Amounts received or due and receivable byauditors other than PKF Australia for: | ||||
| •an audit or review of the financial report of | ||||
| subsidiary entities | 89,037 | 29,670 | 12,422 | 29,670 |
| 157,560 | 29,670 | 66,658 | 29,670 |
21 JOINT VENTURE
At 30 June 2008, the company has interests in the following joint ventures whose principal activities are the exploration for gold, precious metals and base metals.
| Name of Project | Interests | Other Parties | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heemskirk Tin Deposit – Tasmania,Australia | 200840% | 200740% | Stellar Resources Limited – 60% |
| Seiga – Wadi Allaqi, EgyptUm Shashoba – Wadi Allaqi, Egypt | 50%50% | 50%50% | Egyptian Mineral Resources Authority – 50%Egyptian Mineral Resources Authority – 50% |
| Haimur – Wadi Allaqi, Egypt | 50% | 50% | Egyptian Mineral Resources Authority – 50% |
| Nile Valley Block E – Wadi Allaqi,Egypt | 50% | 50% | Egyptian Mineral Resources Authority – 50% |
| Nile Valley Block A – Wadi Allaqi,Egypt | 50% | 50% | Egyptian Mineral Resources Authority – 50% |
| Um Garayat – Wadi Allaqi, Egypt | 50% | 50% | Egyptian Mineral Resources Authority – 50% |
| Koleit – Wadi Allaqi, Egypt | 50% | 50% | Egyptian Mineral Resources Authority – 50% |
| Um Tiur – Wadi Allaqi, Egypt | 50% | 50% | Egyptian Mineral Resources Authority – 50% |
| Abu Swayel – Wadi Allaqi, Egypt | 50% | 50% | Egyptian Mineral Resources Authority – 50% |
The joint ventures are of the type where initially one party contributes tenements with the other party earning a specified percentage by funding exploration activities. The Joint Venture does not hold any assets and accordingly the Company's share of exploration expenditure is accounted for in accordance with the policy set out in Note 2 (f).
Directors' Declaration
The directors of Gippsland Limited declare that:
- (a) in the directors' opinion the financial statements and notes on pages 16 to 56, and the remuneration disclosures that are contained in the Directors' report, set out on pages 7 to 14, are in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, including:
- (i) giving a true and fair view of the company's and the consolidated entity's financial position as at 30 June 2008 and of their performance, for the year ended on that date; and
- (ii) complying with Australian Accounting Standards (including the Australian Accounting Interpretations) and Corporations Regulations 2001.
- (b) the financial report also complies with International Financial Reporting Standards as disclosed in note 1; and
- (c) the remuneration disclosures that are contained in the Remuneration report in the Directors' report comply with Australian Accounting Standard AASB 124 Related Party Disclosures, the Corporations Act 2001 and the Corporations Regulations 2001; and
- (d) there are reasonable grounds to believe that the company will be able to pay its debts as and when they become due and payable.
At the date of this declaration there are reasonable grounds to believe that the company and the group entities identified in note 18 will be able to meet any obligations or liabilities to which they are or may have become subject to by virtue of the Deed of Cross Guarantee between the company and those group entities pursuant to ASIC Class Order 98/1418.
The directors have been given the declarations by the chief executive officer and chief financial officer for the financial year ended 30 June 2008, required by Section 295A of the Corporations Act 2001.
Signed in accordance with a resolution of the directors.
Dated 30th day of September 2008.
R J Telford Director

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
TO THE MEMBERS OF GIPPSLAND LIMITED
Report on the financial report
We have audited the accompanying financial report of Gippsland Limited which comprises the balance sheet as at 30 June 2008, and the income statement, statement of changes in equity and cash flow statement for the year ended on that date, a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory notes and the directors' declaration for both Gippsland Limited (the company) and the consolidated entity. The consolidated entity comprises both the company and the entities it controlled at the year's end or from time to time during the financial year.
Directors' Responsibility for the Financial Report
The directors of the company are responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial report in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards (including the Australian Accounting Interpretations) and the Corporations Act 2001. This responsibility includes establishing and maintaining internal controls relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of the financial report that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; selecting and applying appropriate accounting policies; and making accounting estimates that are reasonable in the circumstances. In Note 2, the directors also state, in accordance with Accounting Standard AASB 101 Presentation of Financial Statements, that compliance with the Australian equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards ensures that the financial report, comprising the financial statements and notes, complies with International Financial Reporting Standards.
Auditor's Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial report based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards. These Auditing Standards require that we comply with relevant ethical requirements relating to audit engagements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial report is free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial report. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgement, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial report, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity's preparation and fair presentation of the financial report in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity's internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by the directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial report.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
Independence
In conducting our audit, we have complied with the independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001.
Tel: 61 8 9278 2222 | Fax: 61 8 9278 2200 | www.pkf.com.au West Australian Partnership | ABN 39 542 778 278 Level 7, BGC Centre | 28 The Esplanade | Perth | Western Australia 6000 | Australia PO Box Z5066 | St Georges Terrace | Perth | Western Australia 6831
PKF is a national association of independent chartered accounting and consulting firms, each trading as PKF. PKF Australia Ltd is also a member of PKF International, an association of legally independent chartered accounting and consulting firms.

Auditor's Opinion
In our opinion:
- (a) the financial report of Gippsland Limited is in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, including:
- (i) giving a true and fair view of the company's and consolidated entity's financial position as at 30 June 2008 and of its performance for the year ended on that date; and
- (ii) complying with Australian Accounting Standards (including the Australian Accounting Interpretations) and the Corporations Regulations 2001; and
- (b) the consolidated financial statements and notes also complies with International Financial Reporting Standards as disclosed in Note 2.
Material Uncertainty Regarding Continuation as a Going Concern
Without qualifying our opinion, we draw attention to Note 2 (b) in the financial report which indicates that the consolidated entity and the parent entity have incurred net losses of $3,425,133 and $5,330,026, respectively during the year ended 30 June 2008. These conditions, along with other matters as set forth in Note 2(b), indicate the existence of a material uncertainty which may cast significant doubt about the consolidated entity's and parent entity's ability to continue as going concerns and therefore whether they will realise their assets and extinguish their liabilities in the ordinary course of business, and at amounts that differ from those stated in the financial statements.
Report on the Remuneration Report
We have audited the Remuneration Report included in pages 7 to 9 of the directors' report for the year ended 30 June 2008. The directors of the company are responsible for the preparation and presentation of the Remuneration Report in accordance with section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Remuneration Report, based on our audit conducted in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards.
Auditor's Opinion
In our opinion the Remuneration Report of Gippsland Limited for the year ended 30 June 2008, complies with section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001.
PKF Chartered Accountants
Neil Smith Partner
Dated at Perth Western Australia this 30th day of September 2008.
Shareholder Information set out as at 17 September 2008
| A | TOTAL EQUITY SECURITIES | Shares | Options ex 26/5/2012 at13.5 cents | Options ex 15/12/2011at 7 pence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Totals on Issue | 306,354,325 | 25,000,000 | 4,000,000 | |
| B | DISTRIBUTION OF EQUITY SECURITIES | |||
| 1 - 1,000 | 68 | |||
| 1,001 – 5,000 | 164 | |||
| 5,001 – 10,000 | 246 | |||
| 10,001 – 100,000 | 626 | |||
| 100,001 and over | 260 | 1 | 2 | |
| 1,364 | 1 | 2 | ||
| No of shareholders holding an unmarketable parcel | 240 | |||
| C | TOP 20 SHAREHOLDERS | Number | % | |
| 1 | International Finance Corporation | 25,000,000 | 8.16 | |
| 2 | ANZ Nominees Limited | 17,735,143 | 5.79 | |
| 3 | Taveroam Pty Ltd | 16,600,000 | 5.42 | |
| 4 | Situate Pty Ltd | 14,750,000 | 4.81 | |
| 5 | Eco International Pty Ltd | 13,256,985 | 4.33 | |
| 6 | King Town Holdings Pty Ltd | 12,000,000 | 3.92 | |
| 7 | Barclayshare Nominees Limited | 7,668,971 | 2.50 | |
| 8 | L R Nominees Limited | 7,667,682 | 2.50 | |
| 9 | Smith & Williamson Nominees Limited | 7,200,000 | 2.35 | |
| 10 | Mr Robert John Telford & Robin K Telford | 6,869,461 | 2.24 | |
| 11 | TD Waterhouse Nominees (Europe) Limited | 6,390,188 | 2.09 | |
| 12 | Alsanto Nominees Pty Ltd | 6,390,000 | 2.09 | |
| 13 | Pershing Nominees Limited | 5,834,444 | 1.90 | |
| 14 | Starvest PLC | 4,500,000 | 1.47 | |
| 15 | HSBC Custody Nominees | 4,329,600 | 1.41 | |
| 16 | Sunvest Corporation Limited | 4,266,665 | 1.39 | |
| 17 | The Bank of New York (Nominees) Limited | 3,522,222 | 1.15 | |
| 18 | HSBC Marking Name Nominee (UK) Limited | 2,611,111 | 0.85 | |
| 19 | HSBC Global Custody Nominee (UK) Limited | 2,331,166 | 0.76 | |
| 20 | Mandu Superannuation Fund | 2,320,000 | 0.76 | |
| 171,243,638 | 55.90 |
Shareholder Information set out as at 17 September 2008
| D | UNLISTED OPTION HOLDERS | Number | Exercise Price | Expiry |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| International Finance Corporation | 25,000,000 | 13.5 cents | 26/05/2012 | |
| FD Holdings Ltd | 2,000,000 | 7 pence | 15/12/2011 | |
| Seymour Pierce Limited | 2,000,000 | 7 pence | 15/12/2011 | |
| E | SUBSTANTIAL SHAREHOLDERS | Number | % | |
| Situate Pty Ltd, Taveroam Pty Ltd and RW Beale | 31,500,000 | 10.28 | ||
| International Finance CorporationEco International Pty Ltd and Mr Robert John Telford & | 25,000,000 | 8.16 | ||
| Robin K Telford | 20,126,446 | 6.57 | ||
| ANZ Nominees Pty Ltd | 17,735,143 | 5.79 |
F VOTING RIGHTS
Under the Company's constitution, all ordinary shares carry one vote per share without restriction. Options over ordinary shares do not carry any voting rights.
F EXPLORATION INTERESTS
As at 25 September, the company has an interest in the following tenements:
| Country | Project | Tenement | Status | Interest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Egypt | Abu Dabbab | Exploitation Licence 1658 | Granted | 50% |
| Egypt | Abu Dabbab | Exploitation Licence 1659 | Granted | 50% |
| Egypt | Nuweibi | Exploitation Licence 1785 | Granted | 50% |
| Egypt | Wadi Allaqi - Seiga | Exploration Licence 1 | Granted | 50% |
| Egypt | Wadi Allaqi - Shashoba | Exploration Licence 1 | Granted | 50% |
| Egypt | Wadi Allaqi – Haimur | Exploration Licence 1 | Granted | 50% |
| Egypt | Wadi Allaqi – Garayat | Exploration Licence 1 | Granted | 50% |
| Egypt | Wadi Allaqi – Koleit | Exploration Licence 1 | Granted | 50% |
| Egypt | Wadi Allaqi – Nile Valley A | Exploration Licence 1 | Granted | 50% |
| Egypt | Wadi Allaqi – Nile Valley E | Exploration Licence 1 | Granted | 50% |
| Egypt | Wadi Allaqi – Abu Swayel | Exploration Licence 1 | Granted | 50% |
| Egypt | Wadi Allaqi – Um Tiur | Exploration Licence 1 | Granted | 50% |
| Eritrea | Adobha | Application 2 | Pending | 90% |
| Eritrea | Adobha | Application 2 | Pending | 90% |
| Eritrea | Adobha | Application 2 | Pending | 90% |
| Australia | Heemskirk (Tasmania) | Retention Licence No.5/1997 | Granted | 40% |
Notes:
1 Tenements granted subject to an agreement with the Egyptian Government (EMRA) dated 21 June 2004.
2 Applications submitted 20 February 2008.