AI assistant
STREAMPLAY STUDIO LIMITED — Annual Report 2003
Sep 29, 2003
65841_rns_2003-09-29_72853a0d-1d45-497f-9cdf-03902e532757.pdf
Annual Report
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer

GPPSLAND LIMITED $A \oplus A$ (2) $A$ / $A \oplus A$ ) $A \oplus A$
GIPPSLAND LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES ABN 31 004 766 376
ANNUAL REPORT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED
30 JUNE 2003
CORPORATE DIRECTORY
DIRECTORS
Robert John Telford John Morrison Chisholm John Damian Kenny
SECRETARY
Gary Christian Steinepreis
REGISTERED AND BUSINESS OFFICE
Suite 34, Level 2, 18 Stirling Highway Nedlands WA 6009
PO Box 352 Nedlands WA 6909
Telephone: (08) 9389 8611 Facsimile: (08) 9389 8612 Email: [email protected] Website: www.gippsland.com.au
AUDITORS
Grant Thornton Level 6, 256 St. George's Terrace Perth WA 6000
SHARE REGISTRY
Security Transfer Registrars Pty Ltd 770 Canning Highway Applecross WA 6153
Telephone: (08) 9315 0933 Facsimile: (08) 9315 2233
STOCK EXCHANGE
The company's securities are quoted on the official list of the Australian Stock Exchange Ltd, the home branch being Perth
ASX Codes:
GIP - ordinary shares GIPO - options
DIRECTORS' REPORT
Your Directors present their report on the Company and its controlled entities for the financial year ended 30 June 2003.
DIRECTORS
The names of Directors in office at any time during or since the end of the year are:
Robert John Telford John Morrison Chisholm John Damian Kenny
Directors have been in office since the start of the financial year to the date of this report unless otherwise stated.
DIRECTORS OUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
Robert John Telford (Chairman) A.W.A.I.T (Chem.) M..R.A.C.I.
Mr Telford is Executive Chairman of Gippsland.
He holds an Associate degree in Pure Chemistry (Organic and Inorganic) having graduated from the Institute of Technology of Western Australia (now Curtin University) in 1967.
Mr Telford has been involved in technology-based industries for some 30 years during which time he has held senior management positions. He has been involved in the international resource industry for some 15 years. He has been involved in the pharmaceutical industry having been a past chairman and major shareholder of the company Inovax Limited. Mr Telford has held the position of CEO in companies involved in inorganic and organic chemical manufacture for some 15 years.
Mr Telford has an interest in 13.973.124 ordinary shares, 6,758,280 listed options and 4,750,000 options to acquire ordinary shares exercisable at 14 cents on or before 11 July 2004.
John Damian Kenny (Executive Director) B. Com (Hons), LLB
Mr Kenny practices law with Blakiston & Crabb, the specialist corporate and resources law firm. He is also an executive director of investment bankers Chatsworth Stirling Pty Ltd, the corporate advisors to the Company. Mr Kenny has a specialised interest in venture capital, initial public offerings and mergers and acquisitions. He has extensive experience in public equity fundraisings and the pricing of equity, debt and derivative securities.
Mr Kenny has an interest in 2,250,000 listed options and 2,250,000 options to acquire ordinary shares exercisable at 14 cents on or before 11 July 2004.
John Morrison Chisholm (Non Executive Director) B.Sc (Hons), PhD., FAusIMM, F.AIG
Dr Chisholm is a consulting geologist with a wide experience in exploration geology and exploration management having worked as lecturer at the University of Western Australia and Curtin University prior to working for various international mining companies.
In 1984 he joined Western United Mining Services Pty Ltd during which time as managing director he managed a large group of geoscientists and was involved in the discovery of the Transvaal and Bounty mines.
Dr Chisholm formed a private geological consulting company, Continental Resource Management Pty Ltd, in 1989 which specialises in exploration management, resource estimations, structural geology and applied geochemistry. He was formerly an adjunct associate professor in economic geology at Curtin University.
Dr Chisholm has an interest in 50,000 ordinary shares, 2,250,000 listed options and 2,250,000 options to acquire ordinary shares exercisable at 14 cents on or before 11 July 2004.
PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES
The principal activity of the economic entity during the financial year was the prospecting and exploration for commercially and economically viable mineral resources.
There were no other significant changes in the nature of the economic entity's principal activity during the year.
OPERATING RESULTS
The consolidated loss after providing for income tax for the year ended 30 June 2003 amounted to $754,635 [2002: $605.788].
DIVIDENDS
No dividend was paid or declared during the year and the directors do not recommend the payment of a dividend for the year ended 30 June 2003.
REVIEW OF OPERATIONS
ABU DABBAB TANTALUM. TIN & FELDSPAR PROJECT
During the year, the Company continued work on the 40 million tonne Abu Dabbab tantalum, tin, and feldspar project (Abu Dabbab Project). The Abu Dabbab Project, which is conveniently situated with respect to ocean ports and general infrastructure, is the subject of a 50:50 joint venture agreement between Gippsland and the Egyptian Geological Survey & Mining Authority (EGSMA), a state agency of the Egyptian Government.
Process Plant-site Allocation
During May 2003, the Egyptian Minister for Industry and Technology. His Excellency Dr Ali Fahmi Al Sa'aidi, issued Ministerial Decree No 91/2003, allocating an area of 14 km2 to the 50:50 joint venture company Tantalum Egypt for the construction of the Abu Dabbab processing plant.
The plant-site is ideally located 6 km from the Red Sea coast and 19 km from the Abu Dabbab 18 km2 Mining Licence situated further inland up Wadi Abu Dabbab. The allocated plant-site lends itself perfectly to the project in that it includes large areas suitable for the process plant construction plus a number of areas that are ideally suited for tailings storage.
The site allows ready access to the Red Sea for process water whilst enabling mill-feed to be trucked by road-train down the gentle slope from the Abu Dabbab mine site.
The 14 km2 area, which was the Company's first preference, was granted within four weeks of Gippsland's application for the plant-site. The exclusivity, size and prompt granting of the plant-site reflects the high level of support the project is enjoying from all levels of the Egyptian Government, particularly H.E. Dr Ali Fahmi Al Sa'aidi who is most supportive of the project and Gippsland's approach to the overall Abu Dabbab development programme.
Testwork Programme
During the year the Company successfully completed various testwork programmes which demonstrated a high level of tantalum pentoxide (Ta2O5) recovery, tin and feldspar.
Based upon the testwork and a mill feed-rate of 1Mtpa, the Abu Dabbab Project is expected to produce approximately 400,000 pounds per year of Ta2O6
The Company is currently treating a 40 tonne bulk sample in a West Australian based pilot plant. The pilot plant programme is being undertaken to optimise past testwork achievements at a larger scale and to finalise the design of the overall project flow-sheet.
Italian Ceramic Test-work
Independent in-plant testwork undertaken in a number of Italian ceramic tile factories has shown that the Abu Dabbab feldspar well suited to the production of premium quality ceramics (including gress porcellanato tiles). The detailed testwork programmes addressed grindability, fusibility, linear shrinkage, degree of whiteness on fusion and general behaviour when mixed with other tile raw materials.
Based upon a mill feed-rate of 1 Mtpa the Abu Dabbab Project is expected to produce 800,000 tpa of ceramic grade feldspar at start-up however recent feldspar market studies indicate that early consideration must be given to increasing Abu Dabbab feldspar production to 1.2 - 1.8 Mtpa shortly after start-up.
$\mathbf{I}$ in
The project will produce about 1,000 tpa of metallic tin (99.99%) which will be routinely sold on market or via the London Metal Exchange.
Bankable Feasibility Study
The Abu Dabbab BFS, which is being undertaken by the engineering group Lycopodium, is proceeding to expectations and is progressively producing encouraging results.
The BFS is proceeding based on an initial throughput of 1 Mtpa. However, if Abu Dabbab feldspar sales proceed as expected, an early decision will be made to expand the operation to between 1.5 Mtpa and 2 Mtpa.
Off-take Agreements
The Company has entered into a Heads of Agreement with a major European group involved in the feldspar industry. The agreement is based on a feldspar off-take of 2.65Mtpa over a 5-year period commencing at 250,000tpa during year one increasing to 900,000tpa during year five.
Project Finance
The Company has been approached by a number of project finance companies and international development banks, all of which have expressed interest in providing project finance. The company is presently undertaking preliminary discussions with the banks which include the International Finance Corporation (IFC), the commercial arm of the World Bank.
SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN STATE OF AFFAIRS
During the year and to the date of this report, there has not arisen any item, transaction or event of a material and unusual nature likely, in the opinion of the directors of the Company, which may significantly affect the operations of the Company, the results of those operations, or the state of affairs of the Company, in future financial years.
AFTER BALANCE DATE EVENTS
No matters or circumstances have arisen since the end of the financial year which significantly affected or may significantly affect the operations of the economic entity, the results of those operations, or the state of affairs of the economic entity in future financial years other than the finalisation of a capital raising of 14,000,000 ordinary shares and 14,000,000 listed options to raise $560,000.
FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS
Information as to likely developments in the operations of the economic entity and the expected results of those operations in future financial years has not been included in this report because, in the opinion of the Directors, it would prejudice the interests of the economic entity.
ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION
The economic entity is required to carry out its activities in accordance with the Mining Laws and regulations in the areas in which it undertakes its exploration activities. The Company is not aware of any matter which requires disclosure with respect to any significant environmental regulation in respect of its operating activities.
PROCEEDINGS ON BEHALF OF COMPANY
No person has applied for leave of Court to bring proceedings on behalf of the Company or intervene in any proceedings to which the company is a party for the purpose of taking responsibility on behalf of the company for all or any part of those proceedings.
The Company was not a party to any such proceedings during the year.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
One of Gippsland's investee companies is Here2win.com Pty Ltd in which Gippsland owns a 90% interest. Here2win.com Pty Ltd is the owner of various unique and highly interactive Internet horse racing gaming concepts. On the 14 August 2000 Gippsland announced to the Australian Stock Exchange Ltd that the services of the Chief Executive Officer of Here2win.com Pty Ltd, Mr Alex Aguero, had been terminated. Mr Aguero, through Highforce Investments Pty Ltd, continues to hold a 10% equity stake in Here2win.com Pty Ltd. Mr Aguero has commenced litigation against Gippsland seeking payment of what he alleges is unpaid compensation for his services rendered while CEO. The statement of claim filed by Mr Aguero with the Supreme Court of Western Australia claims, amongst other things, damages or alternatively the sum of $1,840,000 plus costs. Gippsland holds the view that the claim is completely without merit and accordingly the claim is being vigorously defended.
SHARE OPTIONS
During the period and up to the date of this report, a total of 26,671,393 listed options exercisable at 9 cents on or before 31 December 2007, were issued and 11,000,000 options exercisable at 14 cents on or before 11 July 2004.
As part of the above issues options were granted to directors and executives as follows:
Directors
| Name | 11/7/04 | 31/12/07 |
|---|---|---|
| Robert John Telford or nominee | 4,750,000 | 4.750.000 |
| John Morrison Chisholm or nominee | 2,250,000 | 2,250,000 |
| John Damian Kenny or nominee | 2,250,000 | 2,250,000 |
Other executives
| Name | 11/7/04 | 31/12/07 |
|---|---|---|
| Gary Steinepreis or nominee | 1,250,000 | 1.250.000 |
| Helena Nemchin or nominee | 500,000 | 500,000 |
As at the date of this report the following options were on issue:
| Option expiry date | Exercise price | Number on issue | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31 December 2007 | 9 cents | 26,671,393 | ||
| 11 July 2004 | 14 cents | 11,000.000 | ||
| 15 February 2004 | 20 cents | 250,000 | ||
| 15 February 2004 | 30 cents | 250,000 |
MEETINGS OF DIRECTORS
During the financial year, 4 meetings of directors were held. Attendances were:
| NUMBER OF MEETINGS | NUMBER OF MEETINGS | |
|---|---|---|
| ATTENDED | ELIGIBLE TO ATTEND | |
| Robert John Telford | ||
| John Morrison Chisholm | 4 | |
| John Damian Kenny |
DIRECTORS' AND EXECUTIVES' EMOLUMENTS
The Company's policy for determining the nature and amount of emoluments of Board members and senior executives of the Company is considered by the Directors following a review of the market rates and performance.
Non-executive Directors are remunerated on a fixed fee basis for the performance of services as a Director.
Details of the nature and amount of each element of the emoluments of each Director and the officers receiving the highest emoluments is set out in the following tables:
Directors
Economic Entity and Parent Entity
| Director's | Consulting and | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name | Fees $(S)$ | Management Fees ($) | Superannuation | Total |
| Robert John Telford | 144,000 $(a)$ | $\cdot$ | 144.000 | |
| John Morrison Chisholm | 15,000 | 448(a) | .350 | 16.798 |
| John Damian Kenny | 36,000(a) | $\overline{ }$ | 36,000 |
The consulting and management fees include fees paid to related parties of the Directors.
$(a)$ The Company has entered into an arrangement with a company controlled by RJ Telford to carry out management and administration services on behalf of Gippsland at normal commercial rates. A company in which Dr J M Chisholm has an interest supplies geological services to Gippsland (refer Note 20). The Company had an arrangement with a company associated with Mr J Kenny to supply corporate services to Gippsland at commercial rates. There are no other contracts to which a Director is a party or under which a Director is entitled to a benefit other than as disclosed in these financial statements.
Other executives
| Name | Consulting Fees |
|---|---|
| Gary Steinepreis | 20,800(a) |
"Other executives" are officers who are or were involved in, concerned in, or who take part in, the management of the affairs of the Company and/or related bodies corporate.
$(a)$ The Company has an arrangement with a company in which Mr G Steinepreis is associated with to supply services to Gippsland at commercial rates.
Non-cash benefits - Directors and executives
The Directors and other executives were granted options during the period which are considered to be non-cash benefits. Fair values have been assessed using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The factors taken into account by the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which provides a theoretical value, include the following:
11 July 2004 options
| Exercise price: | 14 cents |
|---|---|
| Term of the option: | exercisable on or before 11/07/04 |
| Market price of shares when valued: | 9 cents |
| Volatility of the underlying share | 100% |
| Risk-free interest rate | 5.81% |
31 December 2007 options
9 cents exercisable on or before 31/12/07 5.5 cents 100% 4.91%
Directors
| Name | 11/7/04 | 31/12/07 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Robert John Telford | 199.500 | 185,250 | 384,750 |
| John Morrison Chisholm | 94.500 | 87.750 | 182,250 |
| John Damian Kenny | 94.500 | 87.750 | 182,250 |
Other executives
| Name | 11/7/04 | 31/12/07 | $\tau$ otal |
|---|---|---|---|
| SteinepreisGarv | 52.500 | 75048. | ,250Λ4. u |
AUDIT COMMITTEE
At the date of this report there is no audit committee of the Board of Directors. The directors are of the opinion that due to the constitution of the Board and the fact that the Board is in ongoing contact with the auditors, a separate audit committee would be of no additional benefit to the Company or its members.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The composition of the Board is considered by the Board as a whole. Due to the size of the Company and the Board there are no special committees of the Board. The Board has the power to appoint new members to the Board and such appointments are subject to re-election by members at the next Annual General Meeting of Members.
The remuneration and terms and conditions relating to the appointment and retirement of Board members and Senior Executives are reviewed and approved by the Board. The Board are responsible for ensuring that there are adequate human resource levels within the Company, selecting appropriate candidates and setting and monitoring employment conditions.
Board members have the right to seek independent professional advice in the furtherance of their duties as Directors at the Company's expense. The Chairman's prior approval of such expenditure is required.
The Board is cognisant of the fact that it must identify significant areas of business risk and implement procedures to manage such risk and develop policies regarding the establishment and maintenance of appropriate ethical standards. Specifically the Board
- ensures compliance with legal statutory and ethical matters
- monitors the business environment
- identifies business risks and opportunities
- ensures prompt and appropriate responses to shareholder enquiries $\bullet$
and to achieve these objectives the Board relies on the advice and assistance of its professional advisers.
INDEMNIFYING OFFICERS AND AUDITOR
During or since the end of the financial year, the company has not given an indemnity or entered into an agreement to indemnify, or paid or agreed to pay an insurance premium for Officers and Auditors indemnity. The Constitution of the Company allows for an indemnity in respect of legal liability for damages and legal costs arising from claims made by reason of any omissions or acts (other than dishonesty) by them, whilst acting in their individual or collective capacity as Directors or Officers of the Company or its controlled entities.
Signed on 30 September 2003 in accordance with a Resolution of the Board.
Juped
R J TELFORD DIRECTOR
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AS AT 30 JUNE 2003
| Economic Entity | Parent Entity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | ||
| Notes | $ | $ | $ | $ | |
| CURRENT ASSETS | |||||
| Cash assets | 5 | 91,013 | 270,754 | 90,913 | 270,654 |
| Receivables | 6 | 17,492 | 24,961 | 17,492 | 24,961 |
| TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS | 108,505 | 295,715 | 108,405 | 295,615 | |
| NON CURRENT ASSETS | |||||
| Receivables | $,6,$ | ||||
| Other financial assets | $\overline{7}$ | 300 | 300 | ||
| Property, plant and equipment | 8 | 11,859 | 19,225 | 11,859 | 19,225 |
| TOTAL NON CURRENT ASSETS | 11,859 | 19,225 | 12,159 | 19,525 | |
| TOTAL ASSETS | 120,364 | 314,940 | 120,564 | 315,140 | |
| CURRENT LIABILITIES | |||||
| Payables | 9 | 60,892 | 37,419 | 60,892 | 37,419 |
| Provisions | 10 | 6,489 | 14,537 | 6,489 | 14,537 |
| TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES | 67,381 | 51,956 | 67,381 | 51,956 | |
| TOTAL LIABILITIES | 67,381 | 51,956 | 67,381 | 51,956 | |
| NET ASSETS | 52,983 | 262,984 | 53,183 | 263,184 | |
| EQUITY | |||||
| Contributed equity | 12 | 11,942,434 | 11,397,800 | 11,942,434 | 11,397,800 |
| Accumulated losses | 11 | (11,889,451) | (11, 134, 816) | (11, 889, 251) | (11, 134, 616) |
| TOTAL EQUITY | 13 | 52,983 | 262,984 | 53,183 | 263,184 |
The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements.
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2003
| Economic Entity | Parent Entity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | ||
| Notes | $ | $ | $ | ||
| EXPENSESCLASSIFICATIONOFBYNATURE | |||||
| Revenues from ordinary activitiesEmployee expensesManagement and consulting expensesExploration expenditureCorporate office expenditureOther expenses from ordinary activities | $\overline{2}$ | 9,577(65, 182)(205, 715)(367,040)(63, 024)(55, 885) | 5,170(83,088)(176, 754)(270,000)(60, 738)(15, 553) | 9,577(65, 182)(205, 715)(367,040)(63, 024)(55, 885) | 5,170(83,088)(176, 754)(270,000)(60, 738)(40, 553) |
| Depreciation expenseLoss from ordinary activities before incometax expenseIncome tax expenses relating to ordinaryactivities | 34 | (7,366)(754, 635) | (4, 825)(605, 788) | (7,366)(754, 635) | (4, 825)(630, 768) |
| Net loss attributable to members of the parententity | 13 | (754, 635) | (605, 788) | (754, 635) | (630, 768) |
| Total revenues, expenses and valuationadjustments attributable to members of theparent entity and recognised directly inequity. | (28, 302) | (28, 302) | |||
| Total changes in equity other than thoseresulting from transactions with owners asowners. | (754, 635) | (634,090) | (754, 635) | (659,070) | |
| Basic loss per share (cents per share) | 16 | (0.8) | (0.8) | ||
| Diluted loss per share (cents per share) | 16 | (0.8) | (0.8) | ||
The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements.
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2003
| Economic Entity | Parent Entity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | ||
| Notes | $ | $ | 5 | S | |
| CASH FLOW FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES | |||||
| Other receipts | 44,704 | 49,791 | 44,704 | 49,791 | |
| Interest received | 9,577 | 5,170 | 9.577 | 5,170 | |
| Payments for exploration expenditure | (403, 744) | (270,000) | (403, 744) | (270,000) | |
| Payments for administrative expenditure | (299, 912) | (441, 504) | (286,075) | (397,700) | |
| Net cash (used in) operating activities | 14(b) | (649, 375) | (656, 543) | (635, 538) | (612, 739) |
| CASH FLOW FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES | |||||
| Loans to subsidiaries | (13, 837) | (43, 804) | |||
| Purchase of plant & equipment | (13,663) | (13,663) | |||
| Net cash (used in) investing activities | (13,663) | (13, 837) | (57, 467) | ||
| CASH FLOW FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | |||||
| Net proceeds from issue of shares | 469,634 | 703,799 | 469,634 | 703,799 | |
| Net cash provided by financing activities | 469,634 | 703,799 | 469,634 | 703,799 | |
| Net increase (decrease) in cash held | (179, 741) | 33,593 | (179, 741) | 33,593 | |
| Cash at the beginning of the financial year | 270,754 | 237,161 | 270,654 | 237,061 | |
| Cash at the end of the financial year | 14(a) | 91,013 | 270.754 | 90.913 | 270.654 |
The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements.
NOTES TO AND FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2003
NOTE 1: STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The financial report is a general purpose financial report that has been prepared in accordance with Accounting Standards. Urgent Issues Group Consensus Views and other authoritative pronouncements of the Australian Accounting Standards Board. The financial report covers the economic entity of Gippstand Limited and controlled entities and Gippsland Limited as an individual parent entity. Gippsland Limited is a listed public company, incorporated and domiciled in Australia. The financial report has been prepared on an accruals basis and is based on historical costs and does not take into account changing money values, or, except where stated, current valuations of non-current assets. Cost is based on the fair values of the consideration given in exchange for assets. The accounting policies have been consistently applied, unless otherwise stated.
The following is a summary of the material accounting policies adopted by the economic entity in the preparation of the financial report.
Principles of Consolidation $(a)$
The consolidated accounts comprise the accounts of Gippsland Limited and all of its controlled entities. A controlled entity is any entity controlled by Gippsland Limited. Control exists where Gippsland Limited has the capacity to dominate the decision-making in relation to the financial and operating policies of another entity so that the other entity operates with Gippsland Limited to achieve the objectives of Gippsland Limited. A list of controlled entities is contained in Note 7 to the financial statements.
All inter-company balances and transactions between entities in the economic entity, including any unrealised profits or losses, have been eliminated on consolidation.
Outside interests in the equity and results of the entities that are controlled are shown as a separate item in the consolidated financial report.
$(b)$ Income Tax
The economic entity adopts the liability method of tax-effect accounting whereby the income tax expense shown in the profit and loss account is based on the profit from ordinary activities adjusted for any permanent differences.
Timing differences which arise due to the different accounting periods in which items of revenue and expense are included in the determination of accounting profit and taxable income are brought to account as either a provision for deferred income tax or as a future income tax benefit at the rate of income tax applicable to the period in which the benefit will be received or the liability will become payable.
Future income tax benefits are not brought to account unless realisation of the asset is assured beyond any reasonable doubt. Future income tax benefits in relation to tax losses are not brought to account unless there is virtual certainty of realisation of the benefit. The amount of benefits brought to account or which may be realised in the future is based on the assumption that no adverse change will occur in income taxation legislation, and the anticipation that the economic entity will derive sufficient future assessable income to enable the benefit to be realised and comply with the conditions of deductibility imposed by the law.
$(c)$ Mineral Exploration Expenditure
Exploration, evaluation and development costs include expenditure on prospects still at an exploratory or development stage. These costs include costs of acquisition, exploration, determination of recoverable reserves, economic feasibility studies and all technical and administrative overheads directly associated with those projects.
Recoupment of capitalised exploration, evaluation and development costs is dependent upon the successful development and commercial exploitation of each area of interest and are amortised over the expected commercial life of each area once production commences.
The economic entity adopts the "area of interest" method of accounting, whereby all exploration, evaluation and development costs (the application of which is approved) relating to an identifiable area of interest are capitalised and carried forward until abandoned. In the event that an area of interest is abandoned, or if the directors consider the expenditure to be of no value, accumulated exploration costs are written off in full against profit in the year in which the decision is made. All expenditure incurred prior to approval of an application is expensed with the exception of refundable rent which is raised as a debtor. A reqular review is undertaken of each area of interest to determine the appropriateness of continuing to carry forward costs in relation to that area of interest.
NOTE 1: STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
$(d)$ Going Concern Basis of Accounting
The general purpose financial report has been prepared on the basis of a going concern. The economic entity's ability to continue as a going concern is contingent upon raising additional capital to fund exploration commitments, other principal activities and for use as working capital. If additional capital is not raised, the going concern basis may not be appropriate with the result that the entity may have to realise its assets and extinguish its liabilities other than in the ordinary course of business and at amounts different from those stated in the financial report. No allowance for such circumstances have been made in the financial report.
Property, Plant and Equipment $(e)$
Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost, less, where applicable, any accumulated depreciation or amortisation. The carrying amount of property, plant and equipment is reviewed annually by the directors to ensure it is not in excess of the recoverable amount from these assets. The recoverable amount is assessed on the basis of the expected net cash flows which will be received from the assets employment and subsequent disposal. The expected net cash flows have not been discounted to their present values in determining recoverable amounts.
The depreciable amount of all fixed assets is depreciated on a straight line basis over their useful lives to the economic entity commencing from the time the asset is held ready for use. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of either the unexpired period of the lease or the estimated useful lives of the improvements.
The depreciation rates for each class of asset are
| Class of fixed asset | Depreciation Rate |
|---|---|
| Leasehold Improvements | 4%-5% |
| Plant and Equipment | 13%-33% |
$(1)$ Foreign currency transactions
Foreign currency transactions during the year are converted to Australian currency at the rates of exchange applicable at the dates of the transactions.
Leases $(a)$
Lease payments for operating leases, where substantially all the risks and benefits remain with the lessor, are charged as expenses in the periods in which they are incurred.
$(h)$ Investments
Non-current investments are measured on the cost basis. The carrying amount of non-current investments is reviewed annually by directors to ensure it is not in excess of the recoverable amount of these investments. The recoverable amount is assessed from the shares' current market value or the underlying net assets in the particular entities.
$(i)$ Comparative Figures
Where required by Accounting Standards comparative figures have been adjusted to conform with changes in presentation for the current financial year.
(i) Interests in Joint Ventures
Interests in Joint Ventures are brought to account by including in the respective classifications the share of individual assets employed and liabilities and expenses incurred in the Statement of Financial Position and Statement of Financial Performance.
$(k)$ Employee Benefits
Provision is made for the Company's liability for employee benefits arising from services rendered by employees to balance date. Employee benefits are expected to be settled within one year together with benefits arising from wages and salaries, annual leave and sick leave which will be settled after one year, have been measured at their nominal value.
Contributions are made by the economic entity to employee superannuation funds and are charged as expenses when incurred.
NOTE 1: STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
$(1)$ Cash
For the purpose of the statement of cash flows, cash includes cash on hand and at call deposits with banks or financial institutions, net of bank overdrafts.
Revenue $(m)$
Revenue for management services is recognised upon the delivery of the service.
Interest revenue is recognised on a proportional basis taking into account the interest rates applicable to the financial assets.
$(n)$ Goods and Services Tax
Revenues, expenses and assets are recognised net of the amount of goods and services tax (GST), except where the amount of GST incurred is not recoverable from the Australian Taxation Office (ATO). In these circumstances the GST is recognised as part of the cost of acquisition of the asset or as part of an item of expense.
Receivables and payables are stated with the amount of GST included.
The net amount of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the ATO is included as a current asset or liability in the Statement of Financial Position.
Cash flows are included in the Statement of Cash Flows on a gross basis. The GST components of cash flows arising from investing and financing activities which are recoverable from, or payable to the ATO are classified as operating cash flows.
Change in Accounting Policies $(0)$
The company has adopted the revised AASB 1028 Employee Benefits and the new AASB 1044 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets for the first time. There has been no material effect on the financial statements on this adoption.
| Economic Entity | Parent Entity | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003$ | 2002$ | 2003$ | 2002S | |||
| NOTE 2: | REVENUE | |||||
| Operating activities:- Interest received from other persons | 9,577 | 5,170 | 9,577 | 5,170 | ||
| Total Revenue | 9,577 | 5,170 | 9,577 | 5,170 | ||
| NOTE 3: | LOSS FROM ORDINARY ACTIVITIES | |||||
| (a) | Loss from ordinary activities before income tax has beendetermined after | |||||
| Expenses:Rental expense on operating leasesMovements in provisions: | 29,484 | 12,110 | 29,484 | 12,110 | ||
| Depreciation of plant and equipment | 7,366 | 4,825 | 7,366 | 4,825 | ||
| Other provisions- Employee entitlements | (9,994) | 2,252 | (9,994) | 2,252 | ||
| - Loans to subsidiariesExploration expenditure | 367,040 | 270,000 | 13,837367,040 | 43,803270,000 | ||
| NOTE 4: | INCOME TAX | |||||
| (a) | Income Tax Expense | |||||
| The prima facie tax on operating loss is reconciled to theincome tax as follows: | ||||||
| Prima facie tax benefit on operating loss before income tax at30% (2002: 30%)Add | (226, 390) | (181, 736) | (226, 390) | (189, 230) | ||
| Tax effect of:Non allowable items | 4,151 | 13,141 | 4,151 | 13,141 | ||
| Income tax benefit attributable to operating loss not brought | ||||||
| to account | (222, 239) | (168, 595) | (222, 239)222,239 | (176,089) | ||
| Future income tax benefit not brought to accountIncome tax expense shown in the accounts | 222,239 | 168,595 | 176,089 | |||
| (b) | Future Income Tax BenefitFuture income tax benefits relating to tax losses not broughtto account as their recoverability is not virtually certain | 1,407,013 | 1,859,218 | 1,407,013 | 1,177,613 | |
| The benefit will only be obtained if:the Company derives future assessable income of a۰nature and of an amount sufficient to enable thebenefits from the deductions for these losses to be realised;the Company continues to comply with the condition for۰deductibility imposed by tax legislation; andno changes to tax legislation adversely affect the۰Company in realising the benefit from the deductionsfor the losses. | ||||||
| NOTE 5: | CASH ASSETS | |||||
| Cash at bank and on hand | 91,013 | 270,754 | 90,913 | 270,654 |
NOTE 6: RECEIVABLES
| CURRENTSundry debtors | 17,492 | 24.961 | 17.492 | 24,961 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NON CURRENTAmounts owing from wholly owned subsidiariesProvision for diminution | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | 2,502,050(2,502,050) | 2,488,213(2,488,213) | |
NOTE7: OTHER FINANCIAL ASSETS
NON CURRENT
Shares in subsidiaries, at cost
| Country ofIncorporation | Class of Shares | Percentage Holding | Cost of Parent Entity'sInvestment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||
| % | ₩ | |||||
| Abutan Pty Ltd | Australia | Ordinary | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Tantalum International Pty Ltd | Australia | Ordinary | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Here2win.com Pty Ltd | Australia | Ordinarv | 90 | 90 | 100 | 100 |
| 300 | 300 |
(a)(b) The controlled entities are not audited as they are small proprietary companies not required to prepare financial statements. The ultimate parent entity is Gippsland Limited.
| Economic Entity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOTE 8:PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT | 2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 |
| Plant and equipment $-$ at costLess: Accumulated depreciation | 129.270(117.411) | 129.270(110.045) | 129.270(117.411) | 129,270(110,045) |
| Total property, plant and equipment | 11.859 | 19.225 | 11.859 | 19.225 |
Movement in carrying amounts:
Movement in the carrying amounts for each class of, property, plant and equipment between the beginning and end of the current financial year.
| Economic | Parent | |
|---|---|---|
| entity | entity | |
| Balance at the beginning of year | 19,225 | 19,225 |
| Additions | ||
| Depreciation expense | (7, 366) | (7, 366) |
| 11,859 | 11.859 | |
| Economic Entity | Parent Entity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 2002 | 2003$ | 2002 | ||
| NOTE 9: | PAYABLES | $ | $ | $ | |
| CURRENT | Sundry creditors and accrued expenses | 54,892 | 37,419 | 54,892 | 37,419 |
| Amounts payable to director related entities | 6,000 | 6,000 | |||
| 60,892 | 37,419 | 60,892 | 37,419 | ||
| NOTE 10: | PROVISIONS | ||||
| CURRENT | |||||
| Employee entitlements | 6,489 | 14,537 | 6,489 | 14,537 | |
| Number of employees at year end | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| NOTE 11: | ACCUMULATED LOSSES | ||||
| Net loss | Accumulated losses at the beginning of the financial year | (11, 134, 816)(754, 635) | (10,529,028)(605, 788) | (11, 134, 616)(754, 635) | (10, 503, 848)(630, 768) |
| Accumulated losses at the end of the financial year | (11,889,451) | (11, 134, 816) | (11,889,251) | (11, 134, 616) | |
| NOTE 12: | CONTRIBUTED EQUITY | ||||
| (a) | Paid up capital: | ||||
| 94,528,359(2002: 78,231,966) fully paid ordinary shares | 11,942,434 | 11,397,800 | 11,942,434 | 11,397,800 | |
| Movement | |||||
| Opening balance۰ | 11,397,800 | 10,574,001 | 11,397,800 | 10,574,001 | |
| Issue of 15,671,393 shares at an issue price of 3 cents۰each - Abu Daddab Project | 469,634 | 469,634 | |||
| Issue of 625,000 shares at an issue price of 12 cents -consultants services | 75,000 | 75,000 | |||
| Issue of 1,000,000 shares at an issue price of 12 centseach - bankable feasibility study | 120,000 | 120,000 | |||
| Issue of 6,100,839 shares at an issue price of 12 centseach | 732,101 | 732,101 | |||
| stockbroking and compliance fees in relation to thecosts of raising capital | (28, 302) | (28, 302) | |||
| Closing balance | 11,942,434 | 11,397,800 | 11,942,434 | 11,397,800 | |
The purpose of the share issues above were to support the ongoing operations of the Company.
NOTES:
- Ordinary shares entitle the holder to participate in dividends and the proceeds on $\langle i \rangle$ winding up of the Company in proportion to the number of shares held.
- On a show of hands every holder of ordinary shares present at a meeting in person or by proxy, is entitled to one vote, and upon a poll each share is entitled to one vote. $(ii)$
| Options on issue | 2003N٥ |
|---|---|
| The following options over ordinary shares are on issue:$O2$ is a constructed of $O2$ and $O2$ are the four $O4$ if $O1O2O3$ | na azi non. |
$(b)$
| The following options over ordinary shares are on issue: | |
|---|---|
| Options exercisable at 9 cents on or before 31/12/2007 | 26.671.393 |
| Options exercisable at 14 cents on or before 11/07/2004 | 11.000.000 |
| Options exercisable at 20 cents on or before 15/02/2004 | 250,000 |
| Options exercisable at 30 cents on or before 15/02/2004 | 250,000 |
| 38,171,393 | |
During the year 26,671,393 options exercisable at 9 cents on or before 31/12/2007 and 11,000,000 options exercisable at 14 cents on or before 11 July 2004 were issued. $E_{conomic}$ $E_{conomic}$
| EconomicEntity2003$ | EconomicEntity2002S | ParentEntity2003S | ParentEntity2002$ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOTE 13: | TOTAL EQUITY RECONCILIATION | ||||
| Balance at the beginning of the yearTotal changes in equity recognised in the Statement ofFinancial Performance attributable to members of the parent | 262,984 | 44,973 | 263,184 | 70,153 | |
| entity | (754, 635) | (605, 788) | (754, 635) | (630,768) | |
| Net proceeds from the issue of shares | 544,634 | 823,799 | 544,634 | 823,799 | |
| Balance at the end of the year | 52,983 | 262,984 | 53,183 | 263,184 | |
| NOTE 14: | CASH FLOW INFORMATION | ||||
| (a) | Reconciliation of cashCash as at the end of the financial year as shown in theStatement of Cash Flows is reconciled to the related items inthe Statement of Financial Position as follows:Cash | 91,013 | 270,754 | 90,913 | 270,654 |
| The Company has no unused, standby or other creditfacilities. | |||||
| (b) | Reconciliation of cash flow from operations to loss fromordinary activities after income tax | ||||
| Loss from ordinary activities after income tax | (754, 635) | (605, 788) | (754, 635) | (630, 768) | |
| Non cash flows in operating loss | |||||
| Depreciation & amortisationProvision for loans to subsidiaries | 7,366 | 4,825 | 7,36613.837 | 4,82543,804 | |
| Issue of shares - non cash | 75,000 | 120,000 | 75,000 | 120,000 | |
| Changes in assets and liabilities | |||||
| (increase) decrease in sundry debtors | 7,469 | 18,428 | 7,469 | (18,592) | |
| increase (decrease) payables | 23,473 | (196, 260) | 23,473 | (134, 260) | |
| increase (decrease) in provisions$\star$ | (8,048) | 2,252 | (8,048) | 2,252 | |
| Net cash flow used in operating activities | (649.375) | (656, 543) | (635.538) | (612, 739) |
| EconomicEntity2003ſ, | EconomicEntity2002 | ParentEntity2003 | ParentEntity2002 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOTE 15: | AUDITORS' REMUNERATION | ||||
| Remuneration of the auditors of the parent entity for auditingand audit review of the financial and half yearly reports | 8,500 | 6,000 | 8,500 | 6,000 | |
| Economic Entity2003S | 2002S | ||||
| NOTE 16: | LOSS PER SHARE | ||||
| Loss per share | |||||
| Basic loss per share (cents per share) | (0.8) | (0.8) | |||
| Diluted loss per share | Diluted loss per share (cents per share) | (0.8) | (0.8) | ||
| (a) | The weighted average number of ordinary shares on issueat end of financial yearWeighted average number of options outstanding | 86,286,413 | 73,508,100 | ||
| (b) | Diluted weighted average number of ordinary shares onissue at the end of the financial yearLoss used in the calculation of basic and diluted | 86,286,413 | 73,508,100 | ||
| loss per share | (754, 635) | (605, 788) |
Refer to note 26 regarding the issue of shares and options subsequent to the end of the financial year.
NOTE 17: STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS BY SEGMENT
The Company operates within the mineral exploration industry predominantly in the geographical segment of Egypt. There are no assets or liabilities recorded with respect to the operations in Egypt and all expenditure is written off to the statement of financial performance.
NOTE 18: COMMITMENTS FOR EXPENDITURE
In order to maintain the mining and exploration tenements in which the Company is involved, the Company is committed to meet the conditions under which the tenements were granted and the obligations of the joint venture arrangement which is subject to the conditions contained in the Joint Venture Agreement and the Mining Licence. This includes the funding of the bankable feasibility study on the Abu Dabbab project which is approximately $500,000 for completion of the feasibility study.
NOTE 19: CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
- In accordance with normal industry practice the Company has entered into a joint venture agreement with other parties for the purpose of $(a)$ exploring and developing various mineral interests. If a party to a joint venture defaults and does not contribute its share of joint venture obligations, then the other joint venturers are liable to meet those obligations. In this event the interest in the permit held by the defaulting party may be redistributed to the remaining joint venturers.
- In June 1992 the High Court of Australia held in "the Mabo case" that the common law of Australia recognises a form of native title. The $(b)$ full impact that the Mabo decision may have on tenements held by the Company is not yet known.
- One of Gippsland's investee companies is Here2win.com Pty Ltd in which Gippsland owns a 90% interest. Here2win.com Pty Ltd is the $(c)$ owner of various unique and highly interactive Internet horse racing gaming concepts. On the 14 August 2000 Gippsland announced to the Australian Stock Exchange Ltd that the services of the Chief Executive Officer of Here2win.com Pty Ltd, Mr Alex Aguero, had been terminated. Mr Aguero, through Highforce Investments Pty Ltd, continues to hold a 10% equity stake in Here2win.com Pty Ltd. Mr Aguero has commenced litigation against Gippsland seeking payment of what he alleges is unpaid compensation for his services rendered while CEO. The statement of claim filed by Mr Aguero with the Supreme Court of Western Australia claims, amongst other things, damages or alternatively the sum of $1,840,000 plus costs. Gippsland holds the view that the claim is completely without merit and accordingly the claim is being vigorously defended.
NOTE 20: RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Transactions between related parties are on normal commercial terms and conditions no more favourable than those available to other parties: Esanamia Entitu Davant Entitu
| ECONOMIC ENLITY | Parent Entity | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (a) | Directors - related entities | 2003$ | 2002$ | 2003$ | 2002$ | |
| Telford Investments Pty Ltd, a company associated withdirector RJ Telford | ||||||
| - fees for management and administration | 144,000 | 144,000 | 144,000 | 144,000 | ||
| Mandu Pty Ltd and Continental Resource Management PtyLtd, companies associated with director J M Chisholm | ||||||
| - fees for geological consultancy services | 448 | 14,392 | 448 | 14,392 | ||
| Ventureworks JDK Pty Ltd, a company associated withdirector J D Kenny | ||||||
| - management fees | 36,000 | 9,000 | 36,000 | 9,000 | ||
| (b) | Share Transactions of Directors | |||||
| Directors and director related entities hold directly, indirectlyor beneficially as at the reporting date equity interests inGippsland Limited as follows: | ||||||
| 2003No | 2002No | |||||
| Ordinary SharesOptions over ordinary shares | 14,023,12420,508,280 | 9,903,395 | ||||
During the financial year, the following options were issued to the Directors:
Directors
| Name | 11/7/04 | 31/12/07 |
|---|---|---|
| Robert John Telford or nominee | 4,750,000 | 4,750,000 |
| John Morrison Chisholm or nominee | 2,250,000 | 2.250,000 |
| John Damian Kenny or nominee | 2,250,000 | 2.250,000 |
REMUNERATION AND RETIREMENT BENEFITS NOTE 21:
Directors of the Company $(a)$
The names of parent entity directors who have held office during the financial year are: Robert John Telford John Damian Kenny John Morrison Chisholm
| Economic Entity | Parent Entity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 2002 | 2002 | 2001 | |
| Directors Remuneration | ||||
| Income paid or payable to all directors of the parent entity by | ||||
| the parent entity and any related parties | 196.798 | 205.192 | 196.798 | 205.192 |
NOTE 21: REMUNERATION AND RETIREMENT BENEFITS (continued)
| Number of directors whose income from the parent entity andany related parties was within the following bands: | 2003 | 2002 |
|---|---|---|
| No | N٥ | |
| $$10,000 - $19,999$ | ||
| $$20.000 - $29.999$ | ||
| $$30,000 - $39.999$ | ||
| $$140,000 - $149,999$ |
$(b)$ Executives remuneration
No executive officers received or were due to receive remuneration from entities in the economic entity and any related entity for management of the affairs of the economic entity in excess of $100,000.
$(c)$ Retirement Benefits
No prescribed benefit amounts were paid by the parent entity or a related party to directors and principal executive officers on retirement from office or to prescribed superannuation funds for the provision of retirement benefits for directors or principal executive officers.
NOTE 22: LEASING COMMITMENTS
| Non cancellable leases contracted for but not capitalised in the | Economic Entity | Parent Entity | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| financial statements in respect of office rental:Pavable: | 2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 |
| Operating Lease Commitments | ||||
| - not later than 1 year | 22.671 | 26.760 | 22.671 | 26.760 |
| - later than 1 year but not later than 5 years | 45.900 | 4.460 | 45,900 | 4.460 |
| Total Operating Lease Commitments | 68.571 | 31.220 | 68.571 | 31,220 |
Subsequent to the end of the financial year, the Company has entered into three year lease agreement on normal commercial terms.
SUPERANNUATION COMMITMENTS NOTE 23:
The Company contributes to a superannuation plan for the provision of benefits to employees of the Company on retirement, death or disability. The benefits provided under the plan are based on contributions for each employee and contributions are at the rate as defined under the Superannuation Guarantee Charge Act 1992.
NOTE 24: FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
$(a)$ Interest Rate Risk
The economic entity's exposure to the interest rate risk which is the risk that a financial instrument's value will fluctuate as a result of changes in market interest rate and the effective weighted average interest rates on classes of financial assets and financial liabilities, is as follows:
| Weighted AverageEffective InterestRate | FloatingInterest Rate | Non InterestBearing | Total | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |
| Financial assetsCash assetsReceivables | 2.5% | 3.9% | 91,013 | 270,754۰ | $\mathbf{r}$17,492 | $\overline{a}$24,961 | 91,01317,492 | 270,75424,961 |
| Total financial assets | 91,013 | 270,754 | 17,492 | 24,961 | 108,505 | 295,715 | ||
| Financial liabilities:PayablesTotal financial liabilities | $\cdot$$\cdot$ | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$$\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | 60.89260.892 | 37,41937,419 | 60,89260,892 | 37,41937,419 |
Credit Risk $(b)$
The maximum exposure to credit risk, excluding the value of any collateral or other security, at balance date to recognised financial assets is the carrying amount, net of any provisions for doubtful debts of those assets, as disclosed in the balance sheet and notes to the financial statements.
The economic entity does not have any material credit risk exposure to any single debtor or group of debtors under financial instruments entered into by the economic entity.
$(c)$ Net Fair Values
For other assets and other liabilities the net fair value approximates their carrying value. No financial assets and financial liabilities are readily traded on organised markets in standardised form.
NOTE 25: INTERESTS IN JOINT VENTURE
At 30 June 2003, the Company has interests in the following joint venture whose principal activities are the exploration for gold, precious metals and base metals.
| Name of Project | % Interests | Other Parties | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 2002 | ||
| Zeehan Tin Deposit - Tasmania | 40% | 40% | Western Metals Ltd 60% |
| Abu Dabbab Project - Egypt | 50% | 50% | EGSMA – 50% |
The Joint Venture is of the type where initially one party contributes tenements with the other party earning a specified percentage by funding exploration activities. The Joint Venture does not hold any assets and accordingly the Company's share of exploration expenditure is accounted for in accordance with the policy set out in note 1(i).
NOTE 26: SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
No matters or circumstances have arisen since the end of the financial year which significantly affected or may significantly affect the operations of the economic entity, the results of those operations, or the state of affairs of the economic entity in future financial years other than the finalisation of a capital raising of 14,000,000 ordinary shares and 14,000,000 listed options to raise $560,000.
The financial effect of the above transaction has not been brought to account at balance date.
DIRECTORS' DECLARATION
The directors of the company declare that:
-
- The financial statements and notes set out on pages 6 to 20:
- comply with Accounting Standards and the Corporations Act 2001; and $(a)$
- $(b)$ give a true and fair view of the financial position as at 30 June 2003 and performance for the year ended on that date of the company and economic entity.
- $\overline{2}$ . In the directors' opinion there are reasonable grounds to believe that the company will be able to pay its debts as and when they become due and payable.
This declaration is made in accordance with a resolution of the Board of Directors on 30 September 2003.
ruped
R J TELFORD DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENT AUDIT REPORT TO MEMBERS OF GIPPSLAND LIMITED
Scope
The financial report and directors' responsibility
The financial report comprises the statement of financial position, statement of financial performance, statement of cash flows, accompanying notes to the financial statements, and the directors' declaration for both Gippsland Limited (the company) and Gippsland Limited (the consolidated entity), for the year ended 30 June 2003. The consolidated entity comprises both the company and the entities it controlled during that year.
The directors of the company are responsible for the preparation and true and fair presentation of the financial report in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001. This includes responsibility for the maintenance of adequate accounting records and internal controls that are designed to prevent and detect fraud and error, and for the accounting policies and accounting estimates inherent in the financial report.
Audit approach
We conducted an independent audit in order to express an opinion to the members of the company. Our audit was conducted in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards, in order to provide reasonable assurance as to whether the financial report is free of material misstatement. The nature of an audit is influenced by factors such as the use of professional judgment, selective testing, the inherent limitations of internal control, and the availability of persuasive rather than conclusive evidence. Therefore, an audit cannot guarantee that all material misstatements have been detected.
We performed procedures to assess whether in all material respects the financial report presents fairly, in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, including compliance with Accounting Standards and other mandatory financial reporting requirements in Australia, a view which is consistent with our understanding of the company's and the consolidated entity's financial position, and of their performance as represented by the results of their operations and cash flows.
We formed our audit opinion on the basis of these procedures, which included:
- $\blacksquare$ examining, on a test basis, information to provide evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial report; and
- п assessing the appropriateness of the accounting policies and disclosures used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by the directors.
While we considered the effectiveness of management's internal controls over financial reporting when determining the nature and extent of our procedures, our audit was not designed to provide assurance on internal controls.
Our audit did not involve an analysis of the prudence of business decisions made by the directors or management.
We have read the other information in the annual report to determine whether it contained any material inconsistencies with the financial report.
Levet 6256 St George's TerracePerth Western Australia 6000 Postal Address: GPO Box P1213 Postal Address: GPC DoxPerth WA 6844 AustraliaT 61 8 9481 1448 F 61 8 9481 0152 [email protected] W www.grastthornton.com.au
GAAL/DETDEPT\General\AudiAG-4AG\Gippsland\2005.auda\completion\EAR+pdf.dsn
Grant Thornton
INDEPENDENT AUDIT REPORT TO MEMBERS OF GIPPSLAND LIMITED (cont)
Independence
In conducting our audit, we followed the applicable independence requirements of Australian professional ethical pronouncements and the Corporations Act 2001.
Audit opinion
In our opinion, the financial report of Gippsland Limited is in accordance with:
- (a) the Corporations Act 2001, including:
- (i) giving a true and fair view of the company's and consolidated entity's financial position as at 30 June 2003 and of their performance for the year ended on that date; and
- (ii) complying with Accounting Standards in Australia and the Corporations Regulations 2001; and
- (b) other mandatory financial reporting requirements in Australia.
Inherent Uncertainty Regarding Continuation as a Going Concern
Without qualification to the audit opinion expressed above, attention is drawn to the following matter. As a result of the matters described in Note 1(d), unless the economic entity is able to raise additional working capital, there is significant uncertainty whether it will be able to continue as a going concern and therefore whether it will realise its assets and extinguish its liabilities in the normal course of business and at amounts stated in the financial report.
( int Thender
GRANT THORNTON Chartered Accountants
Sean Night
SEAN MCGURK Partner
Perth, WA Dated this day of September 2003
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Additional information required by the Australian Stock Exchange Ltd Listing Rules and is not disclosed elsewhere in this report. This information was prepared on share registry information processed up to 24 September 200
$(a)$ Distribution Schedule:
| Spread of Shareholdings | Number of Holders | |
|---|---|---|
| Ordinary Shares | Options | |
| $1 - 1.000$ | 630 | 56 |
| $1,001 - 5,000$ | 287 | 56 |
| $5001 - 10,000$ | 204 | 21 |
| $10,001 - 100,000$ | 430 | 98 |
| 100,001 and over | 129 | 64 |
| TOTAL | 1.680 | 295 |
| Number of shareholders holding less than marketable | 957 | |
| Restricted securities on issue | ΝiΙ | |
Voting Rights $(c)$
All ordinary shares carry one vote per share without restriction
20 Largest Shareholders - Ordinary Shares $(d)$
| Name | Number of Shares | % | |
|---|---|---|---|
| TELTECH CORPORATION PTY LTD | 11,271,695 | 10.39% | |
| SITUATE PTY LTD | 10,000,000 | 9.21% | |
| KING TOWN HOLDINGS PTY LTD | 6,500,000 | 5.99% | |
| SANDSTONE SECURITIES PTY LTD | 6,200,000 | 5.71% | |
| TAVEROAM PTY LTD | 5,900,000 | 5.44% | |
| SUNVEST CORPORATION LIMITED | 5,166,665 | 4.76% | |
| TELFORD ROBERT + ROBIN | 2,616,429 | 2.41% | |
| TRAFALGAR RESOURCE FINANCE | 2,608,332 | 2.40% | |
| COBALT INVESTMENTS LTD | 1,220,481 | 1.12% | |
| WHEATLEY PHILIP + JENNIFER | 1,075,500 | 0.99% | |
| TRICOM NOMINEES PTY LIMITED | 1,049,364 | 0.97% | |
| LYCOPODIUM PTY LTD | 1,000,000 | 0.92% | |
| AVERON HOLDINGS LIMITED | 1,000,000 | 0.92% | |
| EDGEWATER ESTATES LIMITED | 1,000,000 | 0.92% | |
| HEALY ROBERT ANTHONY + | 880,000 | 0.81% | |
| ALEXANDER GORDON EDWARD | 846,238 | 0.78% | |
| KHH (AUS) HOLDINGS PTY LTD | 804,420 | 0.74% | |
| HIGHPLUS HOLDINGS PTY LTD | 786,200 | 0.72% | |
| PATICOA NOMINEES PTY LTD | 710,306 | 0.65% | |
| TROMSO PTY LIMITED | 700,000 | 0.64% | |
| 61,335,630 | 56.49% |
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (CONT.)
$(d)$ 20 Largest Optionholders
| Name | Number of Options | $%$ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| TELTECH CORPORATION PTY LTD | 6,359,708 | 15.64% | |
| MANDU SUPERANNUATION FUND PTY LTD | 2,260,000 | 5.56% | |
| VENTUREWORKS JDK PTY LTD | 2,250,000 | 5.53% | |
| SITUATE PTY LTD | 1,600,000 | 3.93% | |
| SANDSTONE SECURITIES PTY LTD | 1,550,000 | 3.81% | |
| KING TOWN HOLDINGS PTY LTD | 1,500,000 | 3.69% | |
| LEISUREWEST CONSULTING PTY LTD | 1,250,000 | 3.07% | |
| TRICOM NOMINEES PTY LIMITED | 1,150,000 | 2.83% | |
| GOFFACAN PTY LTD | 1,000,000 | 2.46% | |
| AVERON HOLDINGS LIMITED | 1,000,000 | 2.46% | |
| EDGEWATER ESTATES LIMITED | 1,000,000 | 2.46% | |
| GRAY DAVID JAMES | 850,000 | 2.09% | |
| FLEISCHER ANDREW JOHN | 750,000 | 1.84% | |
| SUPERANNUATION ROSEWARNE PTY LTD | 750,000 | 1.84% | |
| MOWALI NOMINEES PTY LTD | 739,430 | 1.82% | |
| HIGHPLUS HOLDINGS PTY LTD | 650,000 | 1.60% | |
| HEALY ROBERT ANTHONY | 570,000 | 1.40% | |
| ALEXANDER GORDON EDWARD | 516,040 | 1.27% | |
| NEMCHIN HELENA | 500,000 | 1.23% | |
| TODARELLO CONSOLIDATED IN. | 500,000 | 1.23% | |
| 26,745,178 | 65.76% |
$(e)$ Significant Holders - Unlisted Securities
$($ f $)$
| Name | Number | $%$ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14 cent Options expiring 11/07/2004 | Telford Investments Pty Ltd | 4,750,000 | |
| Mandu Pty Ltd | 2,250,000 | ||
| JDK Venture Works Pty Ltd | 2,250,000 | ||
| LeisureWest Consulting Pty Ltd | 1,250,000 | ||
| H Nemchin | 500,000 | ||
| Total | 11,000,000 | 100.0 | |
| 20 cent Options expiring 15/2/2004 | |||
| C Farquhar | 250.000 | 100.0 | |
| 30 cent Options expiring 15/2/2004 | |||
| C Farquhar | 250.000 | 100.0 | |
| Substantial Shareholders | Number of Ordinary Sharesin which interests held |
16,000,000 13,973,124 12,700,000
| Situate Pty Ltd and Taveroam Pty Ltd | |
|---|---|
| Teltech Corporation Pty Ltd | |
| Sandstone Securities Pty Ltd and King | |
| Town Holdings Pty Ltd |
$(g)$ Schedule of Interests
| Name of Project | % Interests | Other Parties | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 2002 | ||
| Zeehan Tin Deposit - Tasmania | 40% | 40% | Western Metals Ltd 60% |
| Abu Dabbab Project - Egypt | 50% | 50% | $EGSMA - 50%$ |