AI assistant
Standard Chartered PLC — Interim / Quarterly Report 2018
Jun 30, 2018
4648_ir_2018-06-30_95028d65-6191-4d73-9a12-9831788d3caf.pdf
Interim / Quarterly Report
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
Half Year Report 2018
Driving commerce and prosperity through our unique diversity
Who we are
Standard Chartered is a leading international banking group. Our heritage and values are expressed in our brand promise, Here for good.
We operate in over 60 markets worldwide, including some of the world's most dynamic. More than 80 per cent of our income and profi ts are derived from Asia, Africa and the Middle East. Our businesses serve four client segments in four regions, supported by seven global functions.
For more information about Standard Chartered visit sc.com
@StanChart
linkedin.com/company/standardchartered
facebook.com/standardchartered
Unless another currency is specifi ed, the word 'dollar' or symbol '\$' in this document means US dollar and the word 'cent' or symbol 'c' means one-hundredth of one US dollar.
Those disclosures marked 'unaudited' are not within the scope of KPMG LLP's review.
Unless the context requires, within this document, 'China' refers to the People's Republic of China and, for the purposes of this document only, excludes Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (Hong Kong), Macau Special Administrative Region (Macau) and Taiwan. 'Korea' or 'South Korea' refers to the Republic of Korea. Greater China & North Asia (GCNA) includes China, Hong Kong, Japan, Korea, Macau and Taiwan; ASEAN & South Asia (ASA) includes Australia, Bangladesh, Brunei, Cambodia, India, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Nepal, Philippines, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Thailand and Vietnam; and Africa & Middle East (AME) includes Bahrain, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Within the tables in this report, blank spaces indicate that the number is not disclosed, dashes indicate that the number is zero and nm stands for not meaningful.
Standard Chartered PLC is headquartered in London. The Group's head offi ce provides guidance on governance and regulatory standards. Standard Chartered PLC stock codes are: HKSE 02888; LSE STAN.LN; and BSE/NSE STAN.IN.
FINANCIAL KPIS Return on equity 6.7% 150bps µ Underlying basis 6.1% 160bps µ Statutory basis Common Equity Tier 1 ratio 14.2% 40bps µ Read more from page 14 OTHER FINANCIAL MEASURES Operating income \$7,649m 6% µ Underlying basis \$7,627m 6% µ Statutory basis Profi t before tax \$2,356m 23% µ Underlying basis \$2,346m 34% µ Statutory basis Earnings per share 44.9 cents 10.5 cents µ Underlying basis 40.7 cents 11.2 cents µ Statutory basis Read more from page 14 OUR PURPOSE AND PROGRESS At Standard Chartered our purpose is to drive commerce and prosperity through our unique diversity In this interim report we provide an update on our progress in realising this goal and outline the strategic objectives we are pursuing to strengthen our business, get closer to our clients and fulfi l the Group's potential. We gauge our progress against a set of Group key performance indicators (KPIs), summarised below. Contents Overview Financial KPIs and other fi nancial measures below are compared to H1 2017.
- 04 Group Chairman's statement
- 06 Group Chief Executive's review
- 08 Strategy
- 10 Client segment reviews
- 12 Regional reviews
- 14 Group Chief Financial Offi cer's review
-
19 Group Chief Risk Offi cer's review
-
24 Risk review and Capital review
- 76 Financial statements
- 76 Statement of directors' responsibilities
- 77 Independent review report
- 78 Condensed consolidated interim statements
- 84 Notes to the fi nancial statements
140 Supplementary information
- 140 Supplementary
- fi nancial information
- 157 Other supplementary information 161 Glossary
- 167 Shareholder information
Summary of results
For the six months ended 30 June 2018
| 6 months ended 30.06.18 \$million |
6 months ended 31.12.17 \$million |
6 months ended 30.06.17 \$million |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Underlying performance | |||
| Operating income | 7,649 | 7,067 | 7,222 |
| Operating expenses | (5,117) | (5,351) | (4,769) |
| Credit impairment | (293) | (617) | (583) |
| Other impairment | (51) | (85) | (84) |
| Profi t before taxation | 2,356 | 1,091 | 1,919 |
| Return on ordinary shareholders' equity (%) | 6.7 | 1.9 | 5.2 |
| Return on ordinary shareholders' tangible equity (%) | 7.5 | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Cost to income ratio (%) | 66.9 | 75.7 | 66.0 |
| Statutory performance | |||
| Operating income | 7,627 | 7,204 | 7,221 |
| Operating expenses | (5,185) | (5,547) | (4,870) |
| Credit impairment | (214) | (707) | (655) |
| Goodwill impairment | – | (320) | – |
| Other impairment | (50) | (86) | (93) |
| Profi t before taxation | 2,346 | 661 | 1,754 |
| Profi t/(loss) attributable to parent company shareholders | 1,560 | 23 | 1,196 |
| Profi t/(loss) attributable to ordinary shareholders1 | 1,343 | (197) | 971 |
| Return on ordinary shareholders' equity (%) | 6.1 | (0.9) | 4.5 |
| Return on ordinary shareholders' tangible equity (%) | 6.8 | (1.0) | 5.0 |
| Net interest margin (%) | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Cost to income ratio (%) | 68.0 | 77.0 | 67.4 |
| Balance sheet and capital | |||
| Total assets | 694,874 | 663,501 | 657,638 |
| Total equity | 51,488 | 51,807 | 51,362 |
| Loans and advances to customers | 255,100 | 248,707 | 239,198 |
| Customer accounts | 382,107 | 370,509 | 357,810 |
| Total capital | 58,019 | 58,758 | 58,335 |
| Advances-to-deposits ratio (%)2 | 68.2 | 69.4 | 67.5 |
| Common Equity Tier 1 ratio (%) | 14.2 | 13.6 | 13.8 |
| Total capital (%) | 21.3 | 21.0 | 21.3 |
| UK leverage ratio (%) | 5.8 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Information per ordinary share | Cents | Cents | Cents |
| Earnings per share – underlying | 44.9 | 12.8 | 34.4 |
| – statutory | 40.7 | (6.0) | 29.5 |
| Ordinary dividend per share3 | 6.0 | 11.0 | – |
| Net asset value per share | 1,353.4 | 1,366.9 | 1,356.7 |
| Tangible net asset value per share | 1,202.8 | 1,214.7 | 1,203.5 |
1 Profi t/(loss) attributable to ordinary shareholders is after the deduction of dividends payable to the holders of non-cumulative redeemable preference shares and Additional Tier 1 securities classifi ed as equity
2 The following balances are included when calculating this ratio: reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending of \$37,909 million, repurchase agreements and other similar secured borrowing of \$46,675 million, loans and advances to customers held at fair value through profi t or loss of \$3,710 million and customer accounts held at fair value through or loss of \$6,232 million
3 Represents the recommended interim dividend per share for 2018 and the fi nal dividend per share for 2017
What we do
Serving client segments with differentiated expertise
Where we do it
Building a sustainable business in dynamic economies
Total operating income
Group Chairman's statement Striving to be the best we can be for all our stakeholders
I am pleased to report further progress in the fi rst half of the year on our strategic priorities, resulting in positive income growth year-onyear in each of our four client segments, a 23 per cent increase in underlying profi t before tax and a stronger Common Equity Tier 1 ratio of 14.2 per cent. Given the improved performance, the Board has declared an interim dividend of 6 cents per share.
Opportunities remain substantial
Our improved performance was delivered against a backdrop of continued global economic growth, with strong trade fl ows and investments and US interest rates continuing to normalise.
However, the global expansion is becoming more uneven and while some geopolitical concerns have receded, others have increased, particularly surrounding the trading relationship between the US and China. Given our history and purpose – to drive commerce and prosperity through our unique diversity – we believe that trade protectionism would be bad for the global economy. It is, however, worth noting that although the income we make from China's many trade corridors is important for the Group, our priorities are those radiating from
China in Asia, and along the Belt and Road Initiative routes connecting China with our markets in Africa and the Middle East. As a result, our direct exposure to the risks of US-China trade tensions is limited; we generate far more income fi nancing commerce between China and other markets in our footprint – meaning we stand to benefi t over time if that were to increase – than we do on trade between China and the US.
Overall, the opportunities for our unique franchise remain substantial.
Focusing on clear priorities
The Board and management team are focused on executing the Group's strategy, while preserving strong levels of capital and liquidity, further improving the quality of our balance sheet and reinforcing our risk management framework. Our good progress in this regard is described by Andy in the Group Chief Financial Offi cer's review. This will increase our resilience to potential threats and shocks.
Now we have built a stable base, we are moving on to the offensive, focusing on what we can control and embedding an enhanced performance culture that will ensure we fully capture the opportunities.
In this context, I see the Board's role as supporting an environment where our colleagues feel able to focus on our clients' needs, innovate and take sensible risks to grow and strengthen our business. As Bill explains in his Group Chief Executive's review, we are investing at a faster pace to improve the business, including in new digital banking capabilities across all our markets, from the smallest to the largest, and in initiatives that will make us more productive by enhancing internal effi ciency and programme management capabilities to drive lasting change.
As I said in the 2017 Annual Report, the Board is overseeing far-reaching changes to transform the Group's response to fi nancial crime, both internally as well as in partnership with other organisations around the world. You can read more about what we are doing on this critical journey in the reviews of the Group's Chief Executive and Chief Risk Offi cer.
Reinforcing excellent governance, and a culture of ethical banking
The Board discusses with depth and candour the strategic issues that face the Group and provides challenge to management. Once agreement has been reached, the Board supports the management team, and holds it accountable for execution.
As well as reviewing performance and our strategic priorities, in the fi rst half of this year the Board has focused on key issues such as cyber security, strengthening all facets of diversity, our approach to environmental and social issues, and our external narrative and brand.
We recently refreshed our brand, retaining the original brand promise of Here for good, but developing it further by posing a new – and tougher – challenge: how can banks help tackle some of the problems that stand in the way of global prosperity and commerce? With the acknowledgment that things are not good enough yet, not with the industry, not with the world we live in, or with ourselves, we are determined to play our part in helping to make things better.
We have also agreed our new sustainability philosophy. This refl ects a shift of focus of our environmental and sustainability efforts away from just talking about what we won't do, to increasing our focus on the contribution we can make to promoting sustainable economic and social development to transform the markets in which we operate for the better.
We acknowledge that it can be challenging to balance environmental, social and economic needs. Our revised philosophy sets out how we integrate sustainability into our organisational decision-making and how we will work with our clients, suppliers, NGOs and governments in our markets to address some of those dilemmas.
We want to be a force for good by working with our clients to improve their sustainability performance. This will further strengthen and develop our long-term relationships with our clients, contributing to their competitive advantage and promoting sustainable economic growth in our communities.
Conclusion
As we said when we relaunched our brand: Good enough will never change the world. We will never settle for good enough. Instead, I and all of my colleagues across the world will strive to be the best we can be for all our stakeholders, including our investors, clients, colleagues and communities.
I am confi dent we have the strategy and ability to successfully complete our transformation and deliver sustainably higher returns over the medium and long term.
José Viñals Group Chairman 31 July 2018
Further progress on the path to higher returns Group Chief Executive's review
The Group performed steadily in the fi rst half, with encouraging progress on several fronts. Income from key products continues to grow strongly, we are investing in exciting new digital and other transformative initiatives and our strengthened risk discipline is paying off.
Our return on equity improved year-on-year as a result, which reinforces our confi dence that we will exceed 8 per cent in the medium term and validates our decision to resume an interim dividend. But I want to be clear that we believe 8 per cent is just a milestone on the route to the sustainably higher returns we can achieve if we continue to execute our strategy with consistency, determination and discipline.
Focusing on the client experience
We have a unique proposition which we know our clients value. We are focusing our energy and our investments on the areas where we can provide exceptional solutions to our clients' needs. But we know that technical solutions are only part of the story. That is why our strategy is, fi rst and foremost, centred around delivering the highest-quality client experience. And I am pleased to report that our efforts are working.
On the corporate side we are reinforcing and improving our position as a leading bank in Asia, Africa and the Middle East. Independent research suggests large corporations in Asia are consolidating their international business. This is good for us as we have diversifi ed product and regional capabilities and our clients tell us that we offer increasingly exceptional service. This is refl ected, for example, in our growing Cash Management income and increasing trade volumes. Although our improving league table positions in Financial Markets are not yet evident in our fi nancial results, clients are offering us an increasing share of their business, boding well for future fi nancial improvement.
And on the personal side, our strategy to become a trusted adviser for the affl uent and emerging affl uent, especially in core commercial cities in our markets, has resulted in our Priority and Private Banking client segments growing nicely. The more affl uent clients rated us the best international bank in seven of our eight largest markets last year, and our Net Promoter Score within that strategically important segment improved signifi cantly year-on-year in six of them, including in India and Singapore where we are growing income and starting to regain share lost over the past decade.
Improving business performance
Income year-on-year grew in line with the 5-to-7 per cent medium-term target range that we laid out in February this year. And if you adjust that income for impairment charges – considered a good indicator of underlying quality – it increased by 11 per cent. Around half of our income now comes from differentiated and faster-growing products including Wealth Management and Transaction Banking. Our businesses in Greater China & North Asia continue to perform particularly strongly, alongside plenty of good performances and encouraging signs in our other regions.
We are committed to improving the returns of our mass market and lending businesses and on our lower-returning corporate clients, both through delivering a broader range of profi table products and services, as well as through more actively managing our funding costs and capital allocation. We will continue this progress, even if it means we conclude that we cannot sensibly retain some clients or the expenses we carry to cover them.
Investing intelligently
Accelerating our pace of digitisation is, and will remain, a key strategic priority.
We continue to improve the digital connections that link our clients to our world-class lending, wealth, risk management and transaction banking products. Where we do not have the capabilities ourselves, or where we are less differentiated, we connect to third parties who can best address our clients' needs – an open-architecture approach that has served us, our partners and our clients well over the years in our wealth management business.
That is why we are so energised by the FinTech revolution; these disruptors provide us with the capabilities of much larger fi rms, but in a cost-effective and timely way. We are currently working with over fi fty FinTech companies – from small start-ups to the biggest platforms – to transform our ability to serve our clients digitally. Our recently
announced partnership with Ant Financial, part of the Alibaba Group, is one example of this. Together, we have created a blockchainbased cross-border wallet remittance service between Hong Kong and the Philippines through which we leverage jointly-developed technologies to deliver competitive and secure fi nancial services across our uniquely diverse network.
We are also developing our own innovative digital methods of acquiring and servicing clients. Recent successes with our new digital bank in Côte d'Ivoire and our real-time onboarding process in India are encouraging. We will scale and extend these digital innovations across all of our markets – including in Hong Kong where we are in the process of applying for a virtual banking license – allowing us to cover ever greater client volumes more effi ciently.
Fighting fi nancial crime in the digital era
While technological advances make doing business simpler, faster and better, the diffusion of cyber capabilities in the criminal underworld also makes the fi ght against fi nancial crime more diffi cult. No matter how challenging it may seem, however, we are determined to play a leading role in fi ghting fi nancial crime and to mitigate its heartbreaking impact on the communities that we are dedicated to serve.
Since 2012, we have seen a nearly ten-fold increase in our annual fi nancial crime compliance (FCC) spending, and a morethan seven-fold increase in FCC headcount. We are investing in new machine-learning technologies that will enable us to evaluate vast quantities of data quickly and to fi netune the accuracy of our fi nancial crime surveillance tools, freeing up more capacity to investigate suspicious behavioural and transactional patterns. We are forging public-private partnerships with regulators, fi nancial intelligence units, enforcement agencies and other banks around the world to disrupt illicit fi nancial fl ows. And we are also developing new cyber capabilities of our own: from virtual currency mapping to enhanced profi ling.
As described in note 19 to the fi nancial statements, we continue to cooperate with authorities in the US and the UK in their investigations of past conduct and are engaged in ongoing discussions to resolve them. While the Deferred Prosecution Agreements (DPAs) with certain US agencies have recently been extended pending resolution of the relevant reviews, the US Department of Justice also recognised that the Group has made signifi cant progress in complying with the DPA and in enhancing our sanctions compliance programme. Concluding these historical matters remains a focus for us.
Continuing our cultural transformation
We are strengthening our performance culture to match our ambition to be leaders in the markets we serve and to be a driving force for commerce and prosperity in and across those communities.
The needs of our clients and the markets in which we operate are constantly changing. We need to get ahead of the change by continuously innovating and improving. We need to harness the collective intelligence of all our people – their diverse thinking, experiences and backgrounds.
I am constantly inspired by the enthusiasm of my colleagues across the Group, but also dismayed at the degree to which it can be ground down through unnecessarily complicated processes and bureaucracy. This slows us down on our path to sustainably higher returns and we are determined to root out and destroy ineffi ciencies.
Employees are responding well to this challenge. In the past two years our employee Net Promoter Score has increased from positive 2, to positive 6, to positive 10, meaning that an increasingly large proportion of employees would now recommend the Group as a place to work and the products and services we provide. While the work is far from complete, we are progressing with our cultural transformation to make Standard Chartered a great place to work at, as well as a great bank with which to do business.
Outlook and conclusion
The macroeconomic environment continues to be supported by solid growth fundamentals across our markets but, concurrently, challenged by increasing uncertainty resulting from escalating trade frictions and geopolitical risks. We therefore remain cautiously optimistic on global economic growth.
We have committed to delivering a differentiated proposition for all our stakeholders, and to generating the sustainably higher returns of which we know this unique franchise is capable. Our long-term focus in this regard in no way diminishes our sense of short-term urgency. We have been on a transformation tear these last few years and will not slow down a bit.
I look forward to reporting to you in February next year when I expect to deliver more evidence of progress against our extraordinary agenda.
Bill Winters Group Chief Executive 31 July 2018
Our goals and progress
Capitalising on our strong position
We are well placed to capture the opportunities in our markets, while being aware of potential threats and areas where we need to improve. We have shown further progress against our strategic objectives so far this year, leaving us in a stronger position compared with the same stage last year. Our balance sheet is more resilient and our profi ts and returns are higher
Our purpose makes us different
Our purpose is what sets us apart: we drive commerce and prosperity through our unique diversity. Our strategy helps us achieve our purpose
What we deliver
We deliver an extensive set of solutions, products and services, adapted to the needs of our clients
The value we create
Colleagues
We aim to create long-term value for all our stakeholders, in a sustainable manner
Global
Corporate & Institutional Banking
Serving around 5,300 large corporations, governments, banks and investors
Profi t before tax \$1,093m underlying basis \$1,020m statutory basis
Risk-weighted assets \$139bn
Return on equity (RoE) 6.9% underlying basis
The difference of \$73 million between statutory and underlying profi t represents restructuring costs
Strategic priorities
- ¼ Deliver sustainable growth for clients by understanding their agendas, providing trusted advice, and strengthening leadership in fl ow business
- ¼ Manage our balance sheet to grow income and returns by driving balance sheet velocity, improving funding quality and maintaining strengthened risk controls
- ¼ Improve our effi ciency, innovate and digitise to enhance the client experience
Progress
- ¼ Completed on-boarding of over 100 'New 90' OECD clients, and delivered strong growth from the next generation of 'Next 100' clients
-
¼ Improved balance sheet quality, with investment-grade clients now representing 65 per cent of customer loans and advances (2017: 57 per cent) and high quality operating account balances improving to 49 per cent of Transaction Banking customer balances (2017: 48 per cent)
-
¼ Proportion of low returning client riskweighted assets improved from 16.8 per cent in 2017 to 16.5 per cent
- ¼ Strong collaboration with Retail Banking continues with Employee Banking accounts from our clients up by 75,000
Performance highlights
- ¼ Underlying profi t before taxation of \$1,093 million was up 69 per cent primarily driven by higher income and lower impairment, partially offset by higher operating expenses
- ¼ Underlying income of \$3,451 million was up 7 per cent primarily driven by growth in Cash Management and Financial Markets income which partially offset margin compression in Corporate Finance and Trade Finance
- ¼ Strong balance sheet momentum with loans and advances to customers and customer accounts growing by 14 per cent
- ¼ RoE has improved from 4.1 to 6.9 per cent
Private Banking
Helping over 8,000
high-net-worth individuals manage, preserve and grow their wealth
Risk-weighted assets \$6bn
Return on Equity (RoE) (0.8)% underlying basis
The difference of \$6 million between statutory and underlying loss represents restructuring
Strategic priorities
- ¼ Instil a culture of excellence by improving the expertise and enhancing the skills of senior relationship management teams
- ¼ Improve our clients' experience by enhancing our advisory proposition and reducing the turnaround time of the investment process
- ¼ Balance growth and controls by simplifying the business model through implementation of a rigorous controls enhancement plan
Progress
- ¼ Continued to strengthen our relationship management team by adding 15 senior frontline hires
- ¼ Leveraged our new open architecture platforms like Equity Structured Products and Fixed Income, and simplifi ed processes to reduce client transaction time
- ¼ Targeted marketing of our investment philosophy and advisory capabilities to continue shift towards clients with more than \$5 million in assets under management
Performance highlights
- ¼ Underlying loss before taxation of \$5 million against a loss of \$1 million in prior period, with income growth offset by higher expenses
- ¼ Underlying income of \$271 million was up 12 per cent, with Wealth Management and Retail Products up 18 per cent and 3 per cent respectively
- ¼ Assets under management increased \$5 billion or 8 per cent driven by positive market movements, and \$1.6 billion of net new money
- ¼ RoE decreased from (0.2) to (0.8) per cent
Retail Banking Regional
Serving over nine million individuals and small businesses
Profi t before tax \$617m underlying basis \$613m statutory basis
Risk-weighted assets \$43bn
Return on equity (RoE) 13.0%
underlying basis
The difference of \$4 million between statutory and underlying profi t represents restructuring costs
Strategic priorities
- ¼ Continue to focus on affl uent and emerging affl uent clients and their wealth needs in core cities and capture the signifi cant rise of the middle class in our markets
- ¼ Continue to build on our client ecosystem and alliances initiatives
- ¼ Improve our clients' experience through an enhanced end-to-end digital offering, with intuitive platforms, best-in-class products and service responding to the change in digital habits of clients in our markets
Progress
- ¼ Increased the share of income from Priority clients from 45 per cent in 2017 to 47 per cent as a result of strong Wealth Management and Deposit income growth and increasing client numbers
- ¼ Launched the fi rst digital-only bank in Côte d'Ivoire with a plan to roll out across other markets in the Africa & Middle East region
- ¼ Launched real time on-boarding in India, enabling straight-through current and savings account opening and a signifi cantly improved customer experience
¼ There has been a further improvement in digital adoption, with 47 per cent of clients now actively using online or mobile banking compared to 45 per cent in 2017
Performance highlights
- ¼ Underlying profi t before taxation of \$617 million was up 23 per cent with income growth and lower loan impairment offset by increased expenses
- ¼ Underlying income of \$2,620 million was up 9 per cent with growth of 11 per cent in Greater China & North Asia, and 12 per cent in ASEAN & South Asia, partially offsetting a 1 per cent decline in Africa & Middle East
- ¼ Strong momentum from Wealth Management and Deposits drove the improved income performance, more than offsetting continued margin compression across asset products
- ¼ RoE improved from 10.8 to 13.0 per cent from consistent income growth in focus areas such as Priority clients, Wealth Management and Deposits and continued low levels of loan impairment
Commercial Banking
Supporting over 40,000 local corporations and medium-sized enterprises
Profi t before tax \$140m
underlying basis
\$139m statutory basis
Risk-weighted assets \$33bn
Return on equity (RoE)
3.9% underlying basis
The difference of \$1 million between statutory and underlying profi t represents restructuring costs
Strategic priorities
- ¼ Drive quality sustainable growth by deepening relationships with our existing clients and attracting new clients that are aligned with our strategy, with a focus on rapidly growing and internationalising companies in our footprint
- ¼ Improve client experience, through investing in frontline training, tools and analytics
- ¼ Continue to enhance credit risk management and monitoring and maintain a high bar on operational risk
Progress
- ¼ On-boarded over 2,800 new clients, of which over 20 per cent came from our clients' international and domestic networks of buyers and suppliers
- ¼ Continued strengthening the foundations in credit risk management and improving asset quality. However, gross loan impairment remains elevated, partially offset by recoveries
¼ Straight2Bank utilisation increased by 10 per cent with 57 per cent of active Commercial Banking clients using the capability, up from 52 per cent in 20171
Performance highlights
- ¼ Underlying profi t before taxation of \$140 million was down 26 per cent impacted by loan impairments mainly in Africa & Middle East, partially offset by higher income in Greater China & North Asia
- ¼ Underlying income of \$706 million was up 7 per cent with broad-based growth from Transaction Banking, Financial Markets and Corporate Finance. Income was up 12 per cent in Greater China & North Asia, and up 9 per cent in ASEAN & South Asia, partially offsetting 4 per cent decline in Africa & Middle East
- ¼ Customer loans and advances grew by 7 per cent and customer accounts grew by 2 per cent
- ¼ RoE from Commercial Banking declined from 5.4 to 3.9 per cent largely due to higher loan impairments
Supplementary information
1 Due to a change in methodology for defi ning client groups in 2018, the comparative for 2017 has been re-presented (originally stated at full-year as 44.7%)
Greater China & North Asia
Serving clients in China, Hong Kong, Korea, Japan, Taiwan and Macau. The Group's largest region by income
Risk-weighted assets \$83bn
The difference of \$26 million between statutory and underlying profi t represents restructuring costs
Strategic priorities
- ¼ Leverage our network strength to serve the inbound and outbound cross-border trade and investment needs of our clients
- ¼ Capture opportunities arising from China's opening, including renminbi, Belt and Road Initiative, onshore capital markets and mainland wealth, as well as in digital capabilities
- ¼ Strengthen market position in Hong Kong, and improve Retail Banking performance in China and Korea
Progress
- ¼ We have been active in the opening of China's capital markets, helping overseas investors do business through channels such as Bond Connect, Stock Connect and the Qualifi ed Domestic Institutional Investor initiative
- ¼ Good progress in Retail Banking in Hong Kong. We added more than 18,000 new Priority clients during the year and increasing our active qualifi ed Priority clients by 14 per cent. In June we announced our intent to apply for a virtual bank licence in Hong Kong
¼ We have delivered a modest profi t in Retail Banking Korea and refreshed the strategic agenda in Retail Banking China where performance remained broadly fl at
Performance highlights
- ¼ Underlying profi t before taxation of \$1,289 million was 26 per cent higher with income growth and lower loan impairment partially offset by increased expenses
- ¼ Underlying income of \$3,097 million was 11 per cent higher, with broad-based growth across all markets and client segments particularly in Hong Kong and China
- ¼ Strong balance sheet momentum was sustained with loans and advances to customers up 10 per cent and customer accounts up 9 per cent
ASEAN & South Asia
Our largest markets in ASEAN & South Asia by income are Singapore and India. We are active in all 10 ASEAN countries
Profi t before tax \$589m underlying basis \$677m statutory basis
Risk-weighted assets \$96bn
The difference of \$88 million between statutory and underlying profi t represents impairment recoveries under restructuring
Strategic priorities
- ¼ Optimise geographic portfolio by selectively reshaping sub-scale unprofi table markets and prioritising larger or more profi table markets
- ¼ Shift the income mix towards 'asset-light' businesses such as network and fl ow opportunities in Corporate & Institutional Banking and Commercial Banking; and towards Wealth Management and Priority clients in Retail Banking
- ¼ Deploy differentiating digital capabilities in key markets to improve client experience and productivity
Progress
- ¼ Broad-based income growth from portfolio reshaping in most markets, with doubledigit growth in six markets
- ¼ Good progress on improving business mix, with cash liabilities growing by 6 per cent and Wealth Management income and Global Subsidiaries income up 14 per cent each. In addition, we added around 5,000 new Priority clients during the year
¼ Rolled out several market-leading digital capabilities including real-time onboarding in India and automated individual client due diligence in Singapore
Performance highlights
- ¼ Underlying profi t before taxation of \$589 million grew 47 per cent driven by lower impairments and income growth which was offset by continued investment in our strategic and regulatory agenda
- ¼ Underlying income of \$2,073 million was up 6 per cent driven by higher income across all segments and in eight out of twelve markets
- ¼ Client activity was positive with 6 per cent growth in loans and advances to customers and 2 per cent growth in customer accounts. Risk-weighted assets declined by 1 per cent from improved portfolio quality
Africa & Middle East
Present in 25 markets, of which the most sizeable by income are the UAE, Nigeria, Kenya and Pakistan
Risk-weighted assets \$54bn
The difference of \$41 million between statutory and underlying profi t represents restructuring impairments and costs
Europe & Americas
Centred in London and
New York with a presence across both continents. The region is a major income origination engine for the Group's Corporate & Institutional Banking business and booking centre for Private Banking
\$84m statutory basis
Risk-weighted assets \$41bn
The difference of \$2 million between statutory and underlying profi t represents restructuring impairments and costs
Strategic priorities
- ¼ De-risk and improve the quality of income and maintain a stable platform for sustainable growth
- ¼ Build income momentum in Corporate & Institutional Banking by providing best-in-class structuring and fi nancing solutions and driving origination through client initiatives
- ¼ Continue investing in market-leading digitisation initiatives in Retail Banking to protect and grow market share in core markets; continue with retail transformation to recalibrate our network and streamline structures
Progress
- ¼ Successfully launched digital-only bank in Côte d'lvoire. On track to deliver digital solutions across more countries in Africa during 2018
- ¼ Improved risk profi le through tighter underwriting standards, de-risking and higher coverage ratios leading to lower loan impairment levels
Performance highlights
- ¼ Underlying profi t before taxation of \$387 million grew 5 per cent driven by a reduction in loan impairment
- ¼ Given the economic challenges in the region, underlying income of \$1,376 million was down 1 per cent. Middle East, North Africa and Pakistan delivered fl at income while Africa was down 2 per cent
- ¼ Good performance in Transaction Banking and Wealth Management was offset by margin compression in Corporate Finance and Retail Products
-
¼ Loans and advances to customers were up 5 per cent and customer accounts grew 2 per cent
-
Strategic priorities
- ¼ Continue to attract new international corporate and fi nancial institutional clients and deepen relationships with existing and new clients by banking them across more markets in our network
- ¼ Enhance capital effi ciency, maintain strong risk oversight and further improve the quality of our funding base
- ¼ Grow our Private Banking franchise and assets under management in London and Jersey
Progress
- ¼ Good progress in improving the share of business from targeted multinational corporate clients, with income up 114 per cent and 14 per cent from 'New 90' OECD and 'Next 100' client initiatives respectively. We continue to diversify and selectively expand our client base in the region
- ¼ Focused on sustainably delivering higher returns through improved quality of income combined with risk-weighted assets optimisation. We continue to improve the quality of our funding base in London and New York and our network markets by increasing the proportion of operating account liabilities relative to our balance sheet size
¼ Broad-based growth across the region with a number of markets growing income at a double-digit rate. We are setting up a new subsidiary in Frankfurt to seamlessly serve our European client base
Performance highlights
- ¼ Underlying profi t before taxation of \$86 million up 30 per cent from income growth and lower impairments, offset by an increase in expenses as we invest in people, platforms and processes
- ¼ Underlying income of \$870 million was up 8 per cent driven by strong income in Transaction Banking partially offset by continued subdued Financial Markets performance, particularly in Foreign Exchange. Income generated by our clients booked elsewhere in the network grew by 12 per cent
- ¼ Private and Retail Banking income grew 15 per cent and 16 per cent respectively
- ¼ Loans and advances to customers were up 23 per cent and customer accounts rose 18 per cent
Group Chief Financial Offi cer's review Higher quality business delivering an encouraging performance
Performance summary
| 6 months ended 30.06.18 \$million |
6 months ended 31.12.17 \$million |
6 months ended 30.06.17 \$million |
H1 2018 vs H2 2017 Better/(worse) % |
H1 2018 vs H1 2017 Better/(worse) % |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating income | 7,649 | 7,067 | 7,222 | 8 | 6 |
| Other operating expenses | (4,479) | (4,429) | (4,170) | (1) | (7) |
| Regulatory costs | (638) | (702) | (599) | 9 | (7) |
| UK bank levy | – | (220) | – | nm | nm |
| Operating expenses | (5,117) | (5,351) | (4,769) | 4 | (7) |
| Operating profi t before impairment and taxation | 2,532 | 1,716 | 2,453 | 48 | 3 |
| Credit impairment | (293) | (617) | (583) | 53 | 50 |
| Other impairment | (51) | (85) | (84) | 40 | 39 |
| Profi t from associates and joint ventures | 168 | 77 | 133 | 118 | 26 |
| Underlying profi t before taxation | 2,356 | 1,091 | 1,919 | 116 | 23 |
| Restructuring | (79) | (188) | (165) | 58 | 52 |
| Other items | 69 | (242) | – | nm | nm |
| Statutory profi t before taxation | 2,346 | 661 | 1,754 | nm | 34 |
| Taxation | (753) | (599) | (548) | (26) | (37) |
| Profi t for the period | 1,593 | 62 | 1,206 | nm | 32 |
| Net interest margin (%) | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.6 | ||
| Underlying return on equity (%) | 6.7 | 1.9 | 5.2 | ||
| Underlying return on tangible equity (%) | 7.5 | 2.1 | 5.8 | ||
| Statutory return on equity (%) | 6.1 | (0.9) | 4.5 | ||
| Statutory return on tangible equity (%) | 6.8 | (1.0) | 5.0 | ||
| Underlying earnings per share (cents) | 44.9 | 12.8 | 34.4 | ||
| Earnings/(loss) per share (cents) | 40.7 | (6.0) | 29.5 | ||
| Dividend per share (cents) | 6.0 | 11.0 | – | ||
| Common Equity Tier 1 (%) | 14.2 | 13.6 | 13.8 |
The Group's improved performance in the fi rst half of 2018 represents further encouraging progress.
All fi gures in this review are presented on an underlying basis and comparisons are made to the equivalent period in 2017 unless otherwise stated. A full reconciliation between statutory and underlying results is set out in note 2 to the fi nancial statements.
- ¼ Underlying profi t before tax of \$2.4 billion was 23 per cent higher and statutory profi t before tax was up 34 per cent
- ¼ Operating income of \$7.6 billion grew 6 per cent or 5 per cent on a constant currency basis with strong growth in Transaction Banking, Wealth Management and Deposits more than offsetting lower income from Corporate Finance and the non-repeat of Treasury gains in 2017
-
¼ Operating expenses of \$5.1 billion were up 7 per cent or 5 per cent on a constant currency basis as the Group accelerated investment to improve the business
-
¼ Expenses in the second half of 2018 excluding the UK bank levy are expected to be similar to the fi rst half of the year
- ¼ Credit impairment of \$293 million on an IFRS 9 basis was 50 per cent lower and refl ects management actions to improve asset quality
- ¼ Other impairment of \$51 million related primarily to transport leasing assets
- ¼ Profi t from associates and joint ventures of \$168 million was 26 per cent higher following a continued good performance by the Group's associate investment in China and a better performance by its joint venture in Indonesia
- ¼ Net restructuring charges of \$79 million related primarily to Principal Finance and the ongoing reduction of the liquidation portfolio
- ¼ Other items included a \$69 million gain following the redemption of some GBP-denominated securities
- ¼ The Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) ratio of 14.2 per cent gained a further 60 basis points in the fi rst half
- ¼ The Group's return on equity improved 150 basis points to 6.7 per cent and its return on tangible equity improved 170 basis points to 7.5 per cent
- ¼ The improved fi nancial performance and the Group's strong capital position underpinned the Board's decision to declare an interim dividend of 6 cents per ordinary share
Income
Operating income was up 6 per cent or 5 per cent on a constant currency basis. Sustained momentum in Transaction Banking, Wealth Management and Deposits more than offset the impact of continued asset margin compression. The combination of favourable macroeconomic conditions and further progress improving the quality of the business reinforces the Group's guidance for a 5-to-7 per cent medium-term compound annual growth rate in income.
¼ Corporate & Institutional Banking income was 7 per cent higher as the focus on high quality operating accounts and the benefi t of rising global interest rates resulted in a 25 per cent increase in income from Cash Management that more than offset the impact of asset margin compression in Corporate Finance and Trade Finance. Income in Financial Markets was 4 per cent higher despite mixed but overall challenging market conditions and Foreign Exchange spread compression in part driven by clients' increasing preference for electronic channels
- ¼ Retail Banking income was up 9 per cent driven by strong performances in Greater China & North Asia and ASEAN & South Asia, particularly in Hong Kong and Singapore. Together that offset lower income in Africa & Middle East where market conditions remained challenging. The business continues to benefi t from the focus on affl uent and emerging affl uent clients with income from Wealth Management 15 per cent higher
- ¼ Commercial Banking income was up 7 per cent with the businesses in Greater China & North Asia and ASEAN & South Asia growing 12 per cent and 9 per cent respectively. Together this offset 4 per cent lower income from Africa & Middle East
- ¼ Private Banking income was 12 per cent higher with growth across all products. The business added \$1.6 billion net new money over the past 12 months and assets under management were \$5 billion higher
- ¼ Income in Central & other items (segment) was 15 per cent lower impacted by the non-repeat of gains in Treasury primarily in India in the prior period
- ¼ Income from Greater China & North Asia increased 11 per cent and 9 per cent on a constant currency basis with broad-based improvement across all markets particularly China and Hong Kong
- ¼ Income from ASEAN & South Asia was 6 per cent higher and 3 per cent on a constant currency basis with growth in most markets and particularly Singapore where income was up 15 per cent. Excluding Treasury gains booked in the prior period income in India was broadly stable
- ¼ Income from Africa & Middle East was 1 per cent lower and broadly stable on a constant currency basis as market conditions there remained challenging
- ¼ Europe & Americas income grew 8 per cent with 10 per cent higher income in the UK more than offsetting 3 per cent lower income in the US. The region is an important hub for the Group and originates around one-third of Corporate & Institutional Banking total income
Expenses
Operating expenses of \$5.1 billion were up 7 per cent or 5 per cent on a constant currency basis and broadly fl at half-on-half. Increases year-on-year were driven by investments in people and technology, including the amortisation of cash investments made in prior periods. Expenses in the second half of 2018 excluding the UK bank levy are expected to be similar to the fi rst half due to the more even phasing of investments compared to 2017.
The Group has achieved its four-year \$2.9 billion gross cost effi ciency target six months ahead of plan. The ongoing discipline of delivering gross cost effi ciencies to fund investments is expected to result in cost growth below the rate of infl ation over the medium term.
Impairment
Credit impairment of \$293 million was 50 per cent lower driven by a signifi cant reduction in impairment in Corporate & Institutional Banking refl ecting past actions to improve the risk profi le of this business and the continued focus on high quality new origination. This was partially offset by an increase in Commercial Banking.
Other impairment of \$51 million related primarily to transport leasing assets.
Profi t from associates and joint ventures
Profi t from associates and joint ventures of \$168 million refl ected the continuing good performance of the Group's associate investment in China and a better performance by its joint venture in Indonesia.
As a result, profi t before tax of \$2.4 billion was 23 per cent higher and statutory profi t before tax of \$2.3 billion which is stated after restructuring and other items was 34 per cent higher.
Operating profi t improved signifi cantly in Corporate & Institutional Banking and Retail Banking driven by income growth and lower impairments, which offset lower profi t in Commercial Banking. By region, operating profi t improvement was broad-based, with Hong Kong and Singapore performing particularly strongly. The prior year performance in Central & other items (segment) was impacted by the non-repeat of gains in Treasury.
| 6 months ended 30.06.2018 \$million |
6 months ended 30.07.2017 \$million |
Better/ (worse) % |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate & Institutional Banking | 1,093 | 648 | 69 |
| Retail Banking | 617 | 501 | 23 |
| Commercial Banking | 140 | 188 | (26) |
| Private Banking | (5) | (1) | nm |
| Central & other items | 511 | 583 | (12) |
| Underlying profi t before tax | 2,356 | 1,919 | 23 |
| 6 months ended 30.06.2018 \$million |
6 months ended 30.06.2017 \$million |
Better/ (worse) % |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Greater China & North Asia | 1,289 | 1,025 | 26 |
| ASEAN & South Asia | 589 | 400 | 47 |
| Africa & Middle East | 387 | 369 | 5 |
| Europe & Americas | 86 | 66 | 30 |
| Central & other items | 5 | 59 | (92) |
| Underlying profi t before tax | 2,356 | 1,919 | 23 |
Credit quality
Credit quality overall has continued to improve in the fi rst six months of 2018 due to the disciplined focus on high quality origination within a more granular risk appetite.
IFRS 9 became effective from 1 January 2018 and requires the recognition of expected credit losses rather than incurred losses under IAS 39. Financial instruments that are not already credit-impaired are originated in stage 1 and a 12 month expected credit loss provision is recognised. An instrument will remain in stage 1 until it is repaid unless it experiences signifi cant credit deterioration in which case it will transfer to stage 2, or it becomes credit-impaired where it would transfer to stage 3. The Group has not restated prior periods and comparisons are made to balances as at 1 January 2018.
The Group has made signifi cant progress exiting exposures in the liquidation portfolio with the remaining \$1.6 billion gross loans and advances 72 per cent covered or 90 per cent covered after collateral.
Gross credit-impaired (stage 3) loans in the ongoing business of \$6.2 billion were \$372 million lower following a number of repayments, debt sales and write-offs and signifi cantly lower new infl ows. These exposures represent 2.3 per cent of gross loans and advances in the ongoing business and are 53 per cent covered or 76 per cent covered after collateral.
The proportion of investment grade clients has increased to 61 per cent, exposures in the early alerts portfolio have reduced by \$1.8 billion and credit grade 12 accounts were \$456 million lower.
| 30.06.18 (IFRS 9) | 01.01.18 (IFRS 9) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ongoing business \$million |
Liquidation portfolio \$million |
Total \$million |
Ongoing business \$million |
Liquidation portfolio \$million |
Total \$million |
|
| Gross loans and advances to customers1 | 263,056 | 1,579 | 264,635 | 255,591 | 2,248 | 257,839 |
| Of which stage 1 and 2 | 256,885 | 22 | 256,907 | 249,048 | 22 | 249,070 |
| Of which stage 3 | 6,171 | 1,557 | 7,728 | 6,543 | 2,226 | 8,769 |
| Expected credit loss provisions | (4,186) | (1,118) | (5,304) | (4,704) | (1,626) | (6,330) |
| Of which stage 1 and 2 | (905) | – | (905) | (1,048) | – | (1,048) |
| Of which stage 3 | (3,281) | (1,118) | (4,399) | (3,656) | (1,626) | (5,282) |
| Net loans and advances to customers | 258,870 | 461 | 259,331 | 250,887 | 622 | 251,509 |
| Of which stage 1 and 2 | 255,980 | 22 | 256,002 | 248,000 | 22 | 248,022 |
| Of which stage 3 | 2,890 | 439 | 3,329 | 2,887 | 600 | 3,487 |
| Stage 3 cover ratio before collateral (%) | 53 | 72 | 57 | 56 | 73 | 60 |
| Stage 3 cover ratio after collateral (%) | 76 | 90 | 79 | 78 | 88 | 81 |
| Credit grade 12 accounts (\$million) | 1,027 | 22 | 1,049 | 1,483 | 22 | 1,505 |
| Early alerts (\$million) | 6,857 | – | 6,857 | 8,668 | – | 8,668 |
| Investment grade corporate exposures (%) | 61 | – | 61 | 57 | – | 57 |
1 Includes reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending held at amortised cost of \$4,231 million at 30.06.18 and \$4,568 million at 01.01.18
Restructuring and other items
The Group incurred net restructuring charges of \$79 million including a \$153 million loss in
respect of Principal Finance that offset recoveries in relation to the ongoing reduction of the liquidation portfolio.
In other items the redemption of some GBP-denominated subordinated and senior securities resulted in a net gain of \$69 million.
| 6 months ended 30.06.18 | 6 months ended 31.12.17 | 6 months ended 30.06.17 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Restructuring \$million |
Other items \$million |
Restructuring \$million |
Other items \$million |
Restructuring \$million |
Other items \$million |
||
| Operating income | (91) | 69 | 59 | 78 | (1) | – | |
| Operating expenses | (68) | – | (196) | – | (101) | – | |
| Credit impairment | 79 | – | (90) | – | (72) | – | |
| Other impairment | 1 | – | (1) | (320) | (9) | – | |
| Profi t/(loss) from associates and joint ventures |
– | – | 40 | – | 18 | – | |
| Profi t before taxation | (79) | 69 | (188) | (242) | (165) | – |
Balance sheet and liquidity
The Group's balance sheet is strong, highly liquid and diversifi ed.
Loans and advances to customers were up 3 per cent to \$255 billion with broadbased growth across a range of products. Customer accounts were also higher by 3 per cent as the Group continued to focus on improving the quality and mix of its liabilities.
The advances-to-deposits ratio reduced to 68.2 per cent from 69.4 per cent.
As a result of classifi cation and measurement of fi nancial assets under IFRS 9, \$45 billion of reverse repurchase agreement assets and \$38 billion of repurchase agreement liabilities were reclassifi ed as fi nancial assets held at fair value through profi t or loss. Further details are provided in note 27 to the fi nancial statements.
| Increase/ | Increase/ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30.06.18 | 31.12.17 | (decrease) | (decrease) | |
| \$million | \$million | \$million | % | |
| Assets | ||||
| Loans and advances to banks | 55,603 | 57,494 | (1,891) | (3) |
| Loans and advances to customers | 255,100 | 248,707 | 6,393 | 3 |
| Reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending1, 2 | 12,781 | 54,275 | (41,494) | (76) |
| Other assets | 371,390 | 303,025 | 68,365 | 23 |
| Total assets | 694,874 | 663,501 | 31,373 | 5 |
| Liabilities | ||||
| Deposits by banks | 30,816 | 30,945 | (129) | – |
| Customer accounts | 382,107 | 370,509 | 11,598 | 3 |
| Repurchase agreements and other similar secured borrowing3, 4 | 5,863 | 39,783 | (33,920) | (85) |
| Other liabilities | 224,600 | 170,457 | 54,143 | 32 |
| Total liabilities | 643,386 | 611,694 | 31,692 | 5 |
| Equity | 51,488 | 51,807 | (319) | (1) |
| Total equity and liabilities | 694,874 | 663,501 | 31,373 | 5 |
| Advances-to-deposits ratio (%) | 68.2 | 69.4 |
1 Includes loans and advances to banks of \$8,550 million at 30.06.18 and \$20,694 million at 31.12.17 (see note 14)
2 Includes loans and advances to customers of \$4,231 million at 30.06.18 and \$33,581 million at 31.12.17 (see note 14)
3 Includes customer accounts of \$2,987 million at 30.06.18 and \$35,979 million at 31.12.17 (see note 14)
4 Includes deposits by banks of \$2,876 million at 30.06.18 and \$3,804 million at 31.12.17 (see note 14)
Risk-weighted assets
Total risk-weighted assets (RWAs) were 3 per cent or \$7.9 billion lower since 31 December 2017 with decreases in Corporate & Institutional Banking and Retail Banking more than offsetting increases in Commercial Banking, Private Banking and Central & other items.
Credit risk RWAs were \$3.0 billion lower with increases related to underlying asset growth offset by model, methodology and policy changes and the positive impact of foreign exchange translation.
Market risk RWAs decreased by \$2.4 billion. Around half of this reduction related to the full recognition of certain structured products in
the Group's internal models approach. The remainder followed a reduction in trading book debt security holdings.
Operational risk RWAs were \$2.4 billion lower due to a decrease in the average income over a rolling three-year time horizon, as lower 2017 income replaced higher 2014 income.
| 30.06.18 \$million |
31.12.17 \$million |
Increase/ (decrease) \$ |
Increase/ (decrease) % |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| By client segment | ||||
| Corporate & Institutional Banking | 138,735 | 147,102 | (8,367) | (6) |
| Retail Banking | 42,719 | 44,106 | (1,387) | (3) |
| Commercial Banking | 33,261 | 33,068 | 193 | 1 |
| Private Banking | 6,268 | 5,943 | 325 | 5 |
| Central & other items | 50,884 | 49,529 | 1,355 | 3 |
| Total risk-weighted assets | 271,867 | 279,748 | (7,881) | (3) |
| By risk type | ||||
| Credit risk | 223,198 | 226,230 | (3,032) | (1) |
| Operational risk | 28,050 | 30,478 | (2,428) | (8) |
| Market risk | 20,619 | 23,040 | (2,421) | (11) |
Capital base and ratios
The Group's capital and liquidity positions remain strong with all metrics above regulatory thresholds. The CET1 ratio of 14.2 per cent was 60 basis points higher driven by profi ts in the period and lower RWA, mainly due to foreign exchange translation, lower operational risk RWA and other model changes.
On 4 June 2018, the Group invited holders of a number of GBP-denominated subordinated and senior securities to tender their notes for repurchase by the Group.
As a result of this liability management exercise and other movements, tier 2 capital reduced \$1.1 billion.
Given the Group's improving fi nancial performance and strong capital the Board has recommended resuming the interim dividend at 6 cents per ordinary share.
| 30.06.18 \$million |
31.12.17 \$million |
|
|---|---|---|
| Common Equity Tier 1 capital | 38,512 | 38,162 |
| Additional Tier 1 capital (AT1) instruments | 6,692 | 6,699 |
| Tier 1 capital | 45,204 | 44,861 |
| Tier 2 capital | 12,815 | 13,897 |
| Total capital | 58,019 | 58,758 |
| Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio end point (%) | 14.2 | 13.6 |
| Total capital ratio transitional (%) | 21.3 | 21.0 |
| UK leverage ratio (%) | 5.8 | 6.0 |
Outlook and summary
The Group remains vigilant in relation to the impact of current and potential further trade tariffs introduced by China, the US and the EU, and considering geopolitical uncertainties particularly in the Middle East. However these issues had no apparent impact on our fi nancial performance in the fi rst half.
The combination of favourable macroeconomic conditions and our efforts to improve the quality of the business has delivered another encouraging performance in the fi rst half and supports our existing guidance for income growth in the medium term. This income growth will create capacity to continue investing at scale and pace to further improve and increase the resilience of the business.
Andy Halford Group Chief Financial Offi cer 31 July 2018
Continuing to build on positive momentum Group Chief Risk Offi cer's review
We are committed to growing a strong and sustainable business, and in the fi rst six months of 2018 we continued to build on the progress made last year. We have further strengthened the Group's ability to manage risk while continuing to provide an effective service to our clients. Credit impairment and asset quality have sustained improvements seen in 2017 and our portfolio remains well diversifi ed across client segments, geographies, and industry sectors. We have implemented our revised Enterprise Risk Management Framework, elevating Compliance, Conduct, Financial Crime and Information and Cyber Security to principal risk types. We have also formalised a risk identifi cation process and a risk inventory to assess principal risks, as well as identify new and emerging risks and uncertainties. These changes help to articulate the risk landscape, enabling us to embed a healthy risk culture across the Group.
Proactively managing emerging geopolitical and environmental risks is key to the execution of our strategy. The launch of our new Sustainability Philosophy in May 2018 provides a stronger framework through which we can better promote economic and social development in a manner consistent with our values. We are translating these words into action, for example by restricting our services
to clients in the palm oil industry that do not subscribe to established environmental standards. By recognising that we have responsibilities beyond fi nancial activities and by instilling the right behaviours into our daily activities, we not only mitigate risks in our business but also set an example for investors and clients alike.
More information about the Group's Sustainability philosophy can be found at sc.com/en/sustainability/ philosophy
Our key risk priorities
Effective risk and compliance functions are an essential part of the Group's strategy to deliver strong and sustainable growth. Through a comprehensive risk appetite, we manage a wide range of existing risks and continue to scan the horizon to anticipate new threats. Below are our key priorities for 2018:
Strengthen the Group's risk culture
– Embedding a healthy risk culture remains one of the Group's key priorities. It underpins an enterprise-level ability to identify and assess, openly discuss, and take prompt action regarding current and future risks. The revised Enterprise Risk Management Framework sets out the guiding principles for the behaviours expected from our people when managing risks and enables us to have integrated and holistic risk conversations covering all our principal risks. We are also implementing changes to assess strategic initiatives and growth opportunities from both the fi nancial and non-fi nancial risk perspective. In addition, our enhanced approach to effectiveness reviews facilitates challenge, learning from self-identifi ed issues or weaknesses, and making improvements that are lasting and sustainable
Manage and improve information and
cyber security – We are expanding our capability in this area and enhancing our operating models to manage this risk better. A new risk type framework was approved to prioritise mitigation and governance activities. We are making further improvements through enhanced awareness campaigns and are active participants in external partnerships including the UK Cyber Defence Alliance. These combined efforts will strengthen our defences and aid our efforts to keep pace with evolving cyber threats
Manage fi nancial crime risks – We have continued to enhance our controls, systems and processes, and have made good progress building an effective and sustainable fi nancial crime programme. We passed a number of important milestones in the last six months, such as the launch of a new Mantas transaction monitoring platform in the US and the roll-out of a proprietary client risk assessment covering Corporate & Institutional and Commercial Banking. We are involved in public-private information sharing partnerships in the UK, US, Singapore and Hong Kong, as well as pursuing innovation in fi nancial crime compliance by partnering with RegTech fi rms in the areas of surveillance and investigations. We are continuing our 'De-risking through education' initiative for correspondent banking and nongovernmental organisation clients helping them to enhance their own controls. This collaborative approach facilitates the continued safe provision of services that are vital to the world economy
More information about the Group's commitment to fi ghting fi nancial crime can be found at sc.com/fi ghtingfi nancialcrime
Strengthen our conduct environment
– We are committed to being a force for good, and central to this ethos is our conduct. The Group's Code of Conduct sets the standards for individual behaviour and in 2018 we added Conduct to our principal risk types. Our framework defi nes and identifi es good conduct and illustrates how the different elements of conduct – such as the fair treatment of clients, preventing fi nancial crime and responding to environmental and social risks – all fi t together, embedding an integrated approach to ownership and accountability for conduct risk management. While incidents cannot be entirely avoided, we have no appetite for breaches of laws or regulations and have made it a priority in 2018 to review, refi ne and further strengthen our conduct environment. We expect nothing less than the highest standard at all levels, and where concerns are raised we undertake thorough and fair investigations which allow us to make swift and clear decisions
More information on our Group Code of Conduct can be found at sc.com/codeofconduct
Enhance our compliance infrastructure
– In 2018 we established a multi-year programme to review and enhance our existing structures and processes to ensure we deliver effi ciently and effectively across our markets. Areas of focus include: using technology to support issue management and regulatory relationship management, and enable a more data-driven risk management approach extending across the second and third lines of defence; commencing the roll-out of an enhanced learning and development programme for our compliance offi cers to set standards and expectations, ensure we are getting the best from our people, and encourage independent thought and challenge; developing a new surveillance hub in Global Business Services Kuala Lumpur; and developing tools to help our people assess compliance risks arising from new technologies or solutions such as application programming interfaces or cloud computing
Improve our effi ciency and
effectiveness – The Group has continued to invest in improvements to infrastructure for exposure management, data quality and stress testing. Further enhancements are planned for operational risk management, reporting and data analytics infrastructure. We continue to streamline and simplify our processes to serve clients better and drive internal effi ciencies
Our risk profi le and performance
In 2018 we have continued to improve our portfolios through our focus on high quality origination within a more granular risk appetite. The Group's client exposures remain predominantly short tenor, and our portfolio remains well diversifi ed across client segments, geographies and industry sectors. Our capital and liquidity positions remain strong. While no new areas of stress have emerged, we remain vigilant in light of continued geopolitical uncertainty.
IFRS 9 became effective from 1 January 2018 and the Group has not restated comparative information. Accordingly, amounts prior to 1 January 2018 have been prepared and disclosed on an IAS 39 basis. This primarily impacts credit impairment, which is determined using an expected credit loss approach under IFRS 9 compared with an incurred loss approach under IAS 39.
Credit impairment in the Group's ongoing book was \$293 million in the fi rst half of 2018. This was 50 per cent lower than the equivalent period last year (H2 2017: \$617 million; H1 2017: \$583 million), with reductions seen in Corporate & Institutional Banking and Retail Banking. Including the restructuring charge, gross credit impairment is 67 per cent lower than in the fi rst half of 2017 at \$214 million (H2 2017: \$707 million, H1 2017: \$655 million).
| Credit impairment | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 months ended 30.06.18 \$million (IFRS 9)1 |
6 months ended 31.12.17 \$million (IAS 39)2 |
6 months ended 30.06.17 \$million (IAS 39)2 |
|
| Corporate & Institutional Banking | 673 | 288 | 369 |
| Commercial Banking | 106 | 126 | 42 |
| Private Banking | 1 | 1 | – |
| Retail Banking | 119 | 202 | 172 |
| Total ongoing business | 293 | 617 | 583 |
| Restructuring charge (including liquidation portfolio) | (79) | 90 | 72 |
1 Credit impairment under IFRS 9 covers a broader asset base than loan impairment under IAS 39, effective from 1 January 2018
2 2017 data is prepared and disclosed on an IAS 39 basis
3 Credit impairment recovery of \$14 million in Central & Other items is included in Corporate & Institutional Banking
The credit quality of the corporate portfolio has continued to improve. The percentage of exposure to investment grade clients within the total corporate book increased to 61 per cent (31 December 2017: 57 per cent) as we continued to focus on higher quality origination. Exposures in our early alerts portfolio reduced to \$6.9 billion (31 December 2017: \$8.7 billion) mainly due to exposures being regularised, as well as active mitigating actions such as exposure reduction.
Overall gross credit-impaired (stage 3) loans for the Group have decreased to \$7.7 billion (1 January 2018: \$8.8 billion) with large reductions observed in the liquidation portfolio as we continued to exit these exposures. Gross stage 3 loans in the ongoing business have decreased to \$6.2 billion (1 January 2018: \$6.5 billion); driven by repayments, debt sales and write-offs in Corporate & Institutional Banking. Corporate & Institutional Banking also saw lower infl ows into stage 3, at around 46 per cent of the levels seen in previous periods (H1 2018: \$535 million; H2 2017: \$1,150 million; H1 2017: \$1,153 million) as
historically high infl ows in India and in the Oil and Gas sector did not repeat. Commercial Banking saw higher infl ows (H1 2018: \$402 million; H2 2017: \$268 million; H1 2017: \$192 million) mainly driven by exposures in Greater China & North Asia and Africa & Middle East, with no specifi c industry concentration.
We continue to focus on early identifi cation of emerging risks across all of our portfolios so that we can manage any areas of weakness on a proactive basis. We also perform regular reviews and stress tests of our portfolio to help mitigate any risks that might arise.
The cover ratio in the total book reduced to 57 per cent in the fi rst half of 2018 (1 January 2018: 60 per cent), driven by write-offs and settlements in the liquidation portfolio, and including collateral decreased to 79 per cent (1 January 2018: 81 per cent).
The Group maintains a strong liquidity position, with the liquidity coverage ratio higher at 151 per cent from 146 per cent at the end of 2017, driven by an increase in our liquid asset position. Loans and deposits grew, with our advances-to-deposits ratio decreasing slightly to 68 per cent (H2 2017: 69 per cent). We remain a net provider of liquidity to the interbank markets and our customer deposit base is diversifi ed by type and maturity. We have a substantial portfolio of marketable securities which can be realised in the event of a liquidity stress.
Average Group VaR in the fi rst half of 2018 was 19 per cent lower at \$20.4 million (H2 2017: \$25.1 million), primarily driven by a reduction in the duration of the Treasury Markets portfolio. Trading activities remain primarily client-driven.
Further details of the risk performance for the fi rst six months of 2018 are set out in the Risk profi le section pages 26 to 69
Key indicators
| 30.06.18 (IFRS 9) |
01.01.18 (IFRS 9) |
31.12.17 (IAS 39) |
30.06.17 (IAS 39) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group total business | ||||
| Stage 3 loans, credit-impaired (2018)1 / non-performing loans (2017) (\$ billion) |
7.7 | 8.8 | 8.7 | 9.9 |
| Group ongoing business | ||||
| Stage 1 loans (\$ billion) | 235.1 | 228.5 | ||
| Stage 2 loans (\$ billion) | 21.8 | 20.6 | ||
| Stage 3 loans, credit-impaired (2018)1 / non-performing loans (2017) (\$ billion) |
6.2 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.3 |
| Cover ratio | 53% | 56% | 56%2 | 56%2 |
| Cover ratio (including collateral) | 76% | 78% | 79% | 73% |
| Corporate & Institutional Banking and Commercial Banking3 | ||||
| Investment grade corporate exposures as a percentage of total corporate exposures |
61% | 57% | 54% | |
| Loans and advances maturing in one year or less as a percentage of total loans and advances to customers |
71% | 70% | 70% | |
| Early alert portfolio (\$ billion) | 6.9 | 8.7 | 10.4 | |
| Credit grade 12 (\$ billion) | 1.0 | 1.5 | 1.3 | |
| Aggregate top 20 corporate exposures as a percentage of Tier 1 capital | 53% | 50% | 56% | |
| Collateralisation of sub-investment grade exposures maturing in more than 1 year | 55% | 55% | 56% | |
| Retail Banking 3 | ||||
| Loan-to-value ratio of retail mortgages | 45% | 47% | 48% |
1 Stage 3 loans under IFRS 9 cover a broader asset base than the Group's defi nition of NPL
2 2017 cover ratios rebased to exclude portfolio impairment provisions to align to IFRS 9 (IAS39: 63 per cent on 31.12.17; 67 per cent on 30.06.17)
3 These metrics are not impacted by the switch to IFRS 9, hence data as at 1 January 2018 is not needed for comparative purposes
Our risk management approach
We have continued to build out the Enterprise Risk Management function allowing the Group to identify and manage risks holistically, as well as strengthening the Group's capabilities to understand, articulate and control the nature and level of risks we take while still effectively serving our clients.
The revised Enterprise Risk Management Framework approved in December 2017 sets out a refreshed risk culture and a clear control framework, with sharper delineation of responsibilities between the three lines of defence, and it is being adopted by branches and subsidiaries. In addition, a Group-wide e-learning programme has been launched to support awareness and understanding of the key features of the Framework across all levels of the organisation.
Distinct risk type frameworks have been developed for our ten principal risk types, and these are being communicated and rolled out throughout the organisation. The roll out will include suitable training plans tailored to teams and individuals as required. As at July 2018 all risk type frameworks have been approved.
We are also working on developing the links between our strategy, risk appetite and stress testing in order to better integrate risk considerations into strategic decision-making.
Principal risks
Principal risks are those risks that are inherent in our strategy and our business model. These are formally defi ned in our Enterprise Risk Management Framework which provides a structure for monitoring and control of these risks through the Board-approved risk appetite. The Group will not compromise adherence to its risk appetite in order to pursue revenue growth or higher returns. The table below provides an overview of the Group's principal risks and how these are managed. Further details on these can be found in our 2017 Annual Report.
| Principal risk types | How these are managed |
|---|---|
| Credit risk | The Group manages its credit exposures following the principle of diversifi cation across products, geographies, client segments and industry sectors |
| Country risk | The Group manages its country cross-border exposures following the principle of diversifi cation across geographies and controls business activities in line with the level of jurisdiction risk |
| Market risk1 | The Group controls its trading portfolio and activities to ensure that market risk losses (fi nancial or reputational) do not cause material damage to the Group's franchise |
| Capital and liquidity risk | The Group maintains a strong capital position, including the maintenance of management buffers suffi cient to support its strategic aims, and holds an adequate buffer of high-quality liquid assets to survive extreme but plausible liquidity stress scenarios for at least 60 days without recourse to extraordinary central bank support |
| Operational risk | The Group controls operational risks to ensure that operational losses (fi nancial or reputational), including any related to conduct of business matters, do not cause material damage to the Group's franchise |
| Reputational risk | The Group aims to protect the franchise from material damage to its reputation by ensuring that any business activity is satisfactorily assessed and managed by the appropriate level of management and governance oversight |
| Compliance risk | The Group has no appetite for breaches in laws and regulations; while recognising that regulatory non-compliance cannot be entirely avoided, the Group strives to reduce this to an absolute minimum |
| Conduct risk | The Group strives to maintain the standards in our Code of Conduct and outcomes of our Conduct Framework, by continuously demonstrating that we "Do The Right Thing" in the way we do business |
| Information and cyber security risk |
The Group seeks to avoid risk and uncertainty for our critical information assets and systems and has a low appetite for material incidents affecting these or the wider operations and reputation of the bank |
| Financial crime risk | The Group has no appetite for breaches in laws and regulations related to fi nancial crime, recognising that while incidents are unwanted, they cannot be entirely avoided |
1 Effective from July 2018 Market risk is now a sub-type under 'Traded risk', which also encompasses Counterparty credit risk. A new risk type framework has been approved and further details will be provided in the 2018 Annual Report
Our principal uncertainties
Principal uncertainties refer to unpredictable and uncontrollable outcomes from certain events and circumstances which may have the potential to impact our business materially.
As part of our continual risk identifi cation process, we have updated our Group principal uncertainties from those disclosed in the 2017 Annual Report. The table below summarises our current list of principal uncertainties outlining risk trend changes in relation to 2017, the reasons for the changes and the mitigating actions we are taking.
| Principal uncertainties | Risk trend since December 20171 |
Key risk trend drivers | How these are mitigated/next steps |
|---|---|---|---|
| Geopolitical events, in particular: increase in trade protectionism driven by nationalist |
There are increased concerns on the Middle East geopolitical situation following the decision by the US President to exit the Iran Nuclear Deal and to move the US embassy |
¼ We monitor and assess geopolitical events and take action as appropriate to ensure we minimise the impact to the Group and our clients |
|
| agenda, Korean peninsula and Middle East geopolitical tensions, and post Brexit implications |
from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. In addition, there are increased concerns on global trade implications following a fi rst wave of measures taken by China, the US and the EU on trade tariffs |
¼ We conduct stress tests and portfolio reviews at a Group, country and business level to assess the impact of extreme but plausible geopolitical events |
|
| Macroeconomic conditions, in particular: moderation of growth in key footprint markets |
The risk remains at similar levels as at the end of 2017 |
¼ We monitor economic trends and conduct stress tests and portfolio reviews at a Group, country and business level to assess the impact of extreme but plausible events |
|
| led by China and sharp interest rate rises and asset price corrections |
¼ We monitor on a centralised basis contractual and behavioural interest rate risk exposures, and manage these within a clearly defi ned risk management framework and risk appetite |
| Principal uncertainties | Risk trend since December 20171 |
Key risk trend drivers | How these are mitigated |
|---|---|---|---|
| Climate-related transition risks and physical risks2 |
The risk remains at similar levels as at the end of 2017 |
¼ We have developed an approach for assessing energy utilities clients' power generation assets against a range of physical and transition risks, under multiple climate scenarios and a range of time horizons which will be implemented by the end of 2018. We are considering how we extend this to other sectors in 2018 |
|
| ¼ We have made a public commitment to fund and facilitate \$4 billion towards clean technology between 2016 and 2020 |
|||
| Regulatory reviews and investigations, legal proceedings3 |
The risk remains at similar levels as at the end of 2017 |
¼ We have invested in enhancing systems and controls, and implementing remediation programmes (where relevant) |
|
| ¼ We are cooperating with all relevant ongoing reviews, requests for information and investigations |
|||
| Regulatory changes | The risk remains at similar levels as at the end of 2017 |
¼ We monitor regulatory initiatives across our footprint to identify any potential impact and change to our business model |
|
| ¼ We establish specifi c regulatory programmes to ensure effective and effi cient implementation of changes required by new, or changes in existing, regulations |
|||
| New technologies (i.e. blockchain and artifi cial intelligence) and |
The risk remains at similar levels as at the end of 2017 |
¼ We monitor developments in the technology space which affect the banking sector |
|
| digitisation implications (including data risks) |
¼ We have set up SC Ventures to help promote innovation across the Group |
||
| ¼ We have existing governance and control frameworks in place for the deployment of new technology services and remain vigilant regarding legal and regulatory developments in respect of the usage of new technologies and related data risks. In addition, we are building a framework to ensure fairness, ethics, accountability and transparency in the Group's use of artifi cial intelligence |
1 The risk trend refers to the overall risk score trend which is a combination of potential impact, likelihood and velocity of change
2 Physical risks refer to the risk of increasingly extreme weather events. Transition risks refer to the risk of changes to market dynamics due to governments' response to climate change
3 Further details on current material claims and proceedings are set out in note 19 of the Notes to the fi nancial statements
Conclusion
The Group has carried its momentum of positive change into the fi rst half of 2018. Through disciplined application of our refreshed risk appetite, we can focus on building an effi cient, resilient bank that not only supports our clients fi nancially, but also practises behaviours that benefi t society as a whole. The fi nancial services industry continues to evolve, and we intend to remain at the forefront of progress within it.
Mark Smith Group Chief Risk Offi cer
Risk and Capital review
| Half Year Report |
Pillar 3 Report |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Risk | Credit risk | 26 | 14-45 |
| Basis of preparation | 26 | ||
| Credit risk overview | 26 | ||
| IFRS 9 changes and methodology | 27 | ||
| Maximum exposure to credit risk | 28 | ||
| Analysis of fi nancial instrument by stage | 31 | ||
| Credit quality analysis | 33 | 15-18 | |
| ¼ Credit quality by client segment | 34 | ||
| ¼ Credit quality by geographic region | 37 | ||
| ¼ Credit quality by industry | 39 | ||
| Movement in expected credit impairments for loans and advances to customers and banks |
42 | ||
| Movement in gross exposures for loans and advances to customers and banks | 42 | ||
| Problem credit management and provisioning | 43 | 18-20 | |
| ¼ Credit impairments | 43 | ||
| ¼ Forborne and other modifi ed loans | 44 | ||
| ¼ Credit impaired (stage 3) loans by client segment | 44 | ||
| ¼ Credit impaired (stage 3) loans by geographic region | 46 | ||
| ¼ Movement of credit impaired (stage 3) provisions by client segment | 47 | ||
| Credit risk mitigation | 48 | 32-33 | |
| ¼ Collateral | 48 | ||
| ¼ Collateral – Corporate and Institutional Banking and Commercial Banking | 49 | ||
| ¼ Collateral – Retail Banking and Private Banking | 50 | ||
| Industry and retail products analysis by geographic region | 51 | ||
| IFRS 9 methodology | 53 | ||
| Country risk | 58 | ||
| Market risk | 59 | 46-48 | |
| Market risk changes | 59 | ||
| Liquidity and funding risk | 61 | ||
| Liquidity and funding risk metrics | 61 | ||
| Encumbrance | 63 | ||
| Liquidity analysis of the Group's balance sheet | 66 | ||
| Interest rate risk in the banking book | 69 | ||
| Operational risk | 69 | ||
| Operational risk profi le | 69 | ||
| Other principal risks | 69 | ||
| Capital | Capital summary | 70 | 4-13 |
| ¼ Capital ratio | 71 | 6 | |
| ¼ CRD IV capital base | 71 | 4-5 | |
| ¼ Movement in total capital | 72 | 5 | |
| Risk weighted assets | 73 | 7-9 | |
| UK leverage ratio | 75 | 10-13 |
The following parts of the Risk review and Capital review form part of the fi nancial statements and are reviewed by external auditors:
¼ From the start of the 'Credit risk review' section (page 26) to the end of 'Other principal risks' in the same section (page 69), excluding:
| Risk section | Page |
|---|---|
| Credit quality by geographic region | 37 |
| Credit quality by industry | 39 |
| Credit-impaired (stage 3) loans by geographic region | 46 |
| Industry and Retail Products analysis by geographic region | 51 |
| Country risk | 58 |
| Market risk changes – risks not in VaR | 60 |
| Market risk changes – backtesting | 60 |
| Liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) | 61 |
| Stressed coverage | 61 |
| Net stable funding ratio (NSFR) | 62 |
| Liquidity pool | 62 |
| Encumbrance | 63 |
| Interest rate risk in the banking book | 69 |
| Operational risk | 69 |
| Other principal risks | 69 |
¼ From the start of 'Capital Requirements Directive (CRD) IV Capital base' (page 71) to the end of 'Movement in total capital' (page 72), excluding capital ratios and risk-weighted assets (RWA)
Disclosures noted as 'unaudited' are not within the scope of KPMG LLP's review.
Risk review
Credit risk
Basis of preparation
Unless otherwise stated the balance sheet and income statement information presented within this section is based on the Group's management view. This is principally the location from which a client relationship is managed, which may differ from where it is fi nancially booked and may be shared between businesses and/or regions. This view refl ects how the client segments and regions are managed internally.
Loans and advances to customers balances comprise the ongoing portfolio and liquidation portfolio in this section unless otherwise separately identifi ed.
Loans and advances to customers and banks held at amortised cost in this Risk Review section include reverse repurchase agreement balance held at amortised cost, per Note 14 Reverse repurchase and repurchase agreements including other similar secured lending and borrowing.
Credit risk overview
Credit risk is the potential for loss due to the failure of a counterparty to meet its obligations to pay the Group. Credit exposures arise from both the banking and trading books.
IFRS 9 changes and methodology
IFRS 9 came into effect on 1 January 2018.
A summary of the primary changes for the Group are provided below.
New impairment model
IFRS 9 introduces a new impairment model that requires the recognition of expected credit losses (ECL) rather than incurred losses under IAS 39. This applies to all fi nancial debt instruments held at amortised cost, fair value through other comprehensive income (FVOCI), undrawn loan commitments and fi nancial guarantees.
Staging of fi nancial instruments
Financial instruments that are not already credit-impaired are originated into stage 1 and a 12-month expected credit loss provision is recognised.
Instruments will remain in stage 1 until they are repaid, unless they experience signifi cant credit deterioration (stage 2) or they become credit-impaired (stage 3).
Instruments will transfer to stage 2 and a lifetime expected credit loss provision recognised when there has been a signifi cant change in the credit risk compared with what was expected at origination.
The framework used to determine a signifi cant increase in credit risk is set out overleaf (page 27).
Instruments are classifi ed as stage 3 when they become credit-impaired.
| Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 |
|---|---|---|
| ¼ 12-month expected credit loss |
¼ Lifetime expected credit loss |
¼ Credit-impaired ¼ Non-performing |
| ¼ Performing | ¼ Performing but signifi cant increase in credit risk (SICR) |
|
The Group has not restated comparative information. Accordingly, amounts prior to 1 January 2018 are prepared and disclosed on an IAS 39 basis. This primarily impacts the credit risk disclosures, where loan loss provisioning is determined on an expected credit loss basis under IFRS 9 compared with an incurred credit loss basis under IAS 39.
Where relevant, the 1 January 2018 balance sheet has been used for comparative purposes. The Group's initial estimate of credit impairment provisions on adoption of IFRS 9 was \$6,720 million. Following refi nement of the Group's expected loss models, the estimate of the opening credit impairment provisions has been revised down by \$222 million to \$6,498 million, and the net expected credit loss of \$(1,296) million adjusted against retained earnings has similarly decreased by \$222 million to \$(1,074) million.
A summary of the differences between IFRS 9 and IAS 39 is disclosed in the Notes to the fi nancial statements (page 137).
IFRS 9 changes and methodology
The accounting policies under IFRS 9 are set out in Note 7 Credit impairment and Note 12 Financial instruments. The impact upon adoption of IFRS 9 as at 1 January 2018 is set out in Note 27 Transition to IFRS 9 Financial Instruments. The main methodology principles and approach adopted by the bank are set out in the following table with cross references to other sections.
| Title | Description | Supporting information | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Approach to | For material loan portfolios, the Group has adopted a statistical modelling | Credit risk methodology | 53 |
| determining expected credit losses |
approach for determining expected credit losses that makes extensive use of credit modelling. Where available, the Group has leveraged existing advanced Internal Ratings Based (IRB) regulatory models that have been used to determine regulatory expected loss. |
Key differences between regulatory IFRS expected credit loss models |
53 54 |
| For portfolios that follow a standardised regulatory approach, the Group has developed new models where these portfolios are material. |
Determining lifetime expected credit loss for revolving products |
||
| Incorporation of forward looking information |
The determination of expected credit loss includes various assumptions and judgements in respect of forward looking macroeconomic information. |
Incorporation of forward-looking information and impact of non-linearity |
54 |
| Forecast of key macroeconomic variables underlying the expected credit loss calculation |
54 | ||
| Signifi cant | Expected credit loss for fi nancial assets will transfer from a 12 month basis to a | Quantitative criteria | 55 |
| increase in credit risk ('SICR') |
lifetime basis when there is a signifi cant increase in credit risk (SICR) relative to that which was expected at the time of origination, or when the asset becomes credit impaired. On transfer to a lifetime basis, the expected credit loss for those |
Signifi cant increase in credit risk thresholds |
55 |
| assets will refl ect the impact of a default event expected to occur over the remaining lifetime of the instrument rather than just over the 12 months from the |
Specifi c qualitative and quantitative criteria per segment: |
56 | |
| reporting date. SICR is assessed by comparing the risk of default of an exposure at the |
Corporate & Institutional and Commercial Banking clients |
56 | |
| reporting date with the risk of default at origination (after considering the passage of time). 'Signifi cant' does not mean statistically signifi cant nor is it refl ective of |
Retail Banking clients | 56 | |
| the extent of the impact on the Group's fi nancial statements. Whether a change | Private Banking clients | 56 | |
| in the risk of default is signifi cant or not is assessed using quantitative and qualitative criteria, the weight of which will depend on the type of product and counterparty. |
Debt securities | 56 | |
| The Group uses a mix of quantitative and qualitative criteria to assess SICR. | |||
| Assessment of | Credit-impaired fi nancial assets comprise those assets that have experienced | Retail Banking clients | 57 |
| credit-impaired fi nancial assets |
an observed credit event and are in default. Default represents those assets that are at least 90 days past due in respect of principal and interest payments |
Corporate & Institutional Banking clients |
57 |
| and/or where the assets are otherwise considered unlikely to pay. Unlikely to pay factors include objective conditions such as bankruptcy, debt restructuring, fraud or death. It also includes credit-related modifi cations of contractual cash fl ows due to signifi cant fi nancial diffi culty (forbearance) where the bank has granted concessions that it would not ordinarily consider. |
Commercial Banking and Private Banking clients |
57 | |
| Modifi ed fi nancial assets |
Where the contractual terms of a fi nancial instrument have been modifi ed, and this does not result in the instrument being derecognised, a modifi cation gain or loss is recognised in the income statement representing the difference between the original cash fl ows and the modifi ed cash fl ows, discounted at the effective interest rate. The modifi cation gain/loss is directly applied to the gross carrying amount of the instrument. |
Forbearance and other modifi ed loans |
|
| If the modifi cation is credit related, such as forbearance or where the Group has granted concessions that it would not ordinarily consider, then it will be considered credit-impaired. Modifi cations that are not credit related will be subject to an assessment of whether the asset's credit risk has increased signifi cantly since origination by comparing the remaining lifetime probability of default (PD) based on the modifi ed terms with the remaining lifetime PD based on the original contractual terms. |
| Title | Description | Supporting information | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transfers between stages |
Assets will transfer from stage 3 to stage 2 when they are no longer considered to be credit-impaired. Assets will not be considered credit-impaired only if the customer makes payments such that they are paid to current in line with the original contractual terms. In addition: |
Movement in loan exposures and expected credit losses |
|
| ¼ Loans that were subject to forbearance measures must remain current for 12 months before they can be transferred to stage 2; ¼ Retail loans that were not subject to forbearance measures must remain current for 180 days before they can be transferred to stage 2 or stage 1. |
|||
| Assets may transfer to stage 1 if they are no longer considered to have experienced a signifi cant increase in credit risk. This will be immediate when the original PD based transfer criteria are no longer met (and as long as none of the other transfer criteria apply). Where assets were transferred using other measures, the assets will only transfer back to stage 1 when the condition that caused the signifi cant increase in credit risk no longer applies (and as long as none of the other transfer criteria apply). |
|||
| Governance and application of |
The determination of expected credit losses requires a signifi cant degree of management judgement which has impacted governance processes, |
Group Credit Model Assessment Committee |
57 |
| expert credit judgement in respect of expected credit losses |
with the output of the expected credit models assessed by the IFRS 9 Impairment Committee. |
IFRS 9 Impairment Committee | 57 |
Maximum exposure to credit risk
The table below presents the Group's maximum exposure to credit risk for its on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet fi nancial instruments as at 30 June 2018, before and after taking into account any collateral held or other credit risk mitigation.
For on-balance sheet instruments, the maximum exposure to credit risk is the carrying amount reported on the balance sheet. For off-balance sheet instruments, the maximum exposure to credit risk generally represents the contractual notional amounts.
The Group's maximum exposure to credit risk is spread across its markets and is affected by the general economic conditions in the geographies in which it operates. The Group sets limits on the exposure to any counterparty, and credit risk is spread over a variety of different personal, commercial and institutional customers.
The Group's gross maximum exposure to credit risk has increased by \$34.8 billion when compared with 1 January 2018, mainly due to on-balance sheet exposure driven by growth in loans and advances, investment securities, expansion of the reverse repo business and other assets. Investment securities increased by \$6.6 billion mainly due to higher yield and concentration on investing in high-quality liquid assets for regulatory metrics. Increase in other assets is driven by higher amount of short term unsettled trades at the end of H1 2018 relative to 2017 year end.
Maximum exposure to credit risk
| 30.06.18 | 01.01.18 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Credit risk management | Credit risk management | ||||||||
| Maximum exposure \$million |
Collateral \$million |
Master netting agreements \$million |
Net exposure \$ million |
Maximum exposure \$million |
Collateral \$million |
Master netting agreements \$million |
Net exposure \$million |
||
| On-balance sheet | |||||||||
| Cash and balances at central banks | 58,213 | – | – | 58,213 | 58,864 | – | – | 58,864 | |
| Loans and advances to customers held at:1 | 258,810 | 250,848 | |||||||
| Fair value through profi t or loss | 3,710 | 3,907 | |||||||
| Amortised cost | 255,100 | 246,941 | |||||||
| Loans and advances to banks held at:1 | 58,847 | 60,059 | |||||||
| Fair value through profi t or loss | 3,244 | 2,865 | |||||||
| Amortised cost | 55,603 | 57,194 | |||||||
| Total loans and advances to banks and customers |
317,657 | 106,084 | – | 211,573 | 310,907 | 113,062 | – | 197,845 | |
| Reverse repurchase agreements and other secured lending6 |
64,421 | 64,421 | – | – | 55,185 | 55,185 | – | – | |
| Fair value through profi t or loss | 51,640 | 45,518 | |||||||
| Amortised cost | 12,781 | 9,667 | |||||||
| Investment securities2 | 142,369 | – | – | 142,369 | 135,814 | – | – | 135,814 | |
| As per balance sheet | 123,081 | – | – | 123,081 | 115,813 | – | – | 115,813 | |
| Fair value through profi t or loss | 21,275 | – | – | 21,275 | 22,350 | – | – | 22,350 | |
| Less: equity securities | (1,987) | – | – | (1,987) | (2,349) | – | – | (2,349) | |
| Derivative fi nancial instruments3 | 51,780 | 10,631 | 34,153 | 6,996 | 47,031 | 9,825 | 29,135 | 8,071 | |
| Accrued income | 2,082 | – | – | 2,082 | 1,947 | – | – | 1,947 | |
| Assets held for sale | 2 | – | – | 2 | 2 | – | – | 2 | |
| Other assets4 | 34,441 | – | – | 34,441 | 29,922 | – | – | 29,922 | |
| Total balance sheet | 670,965 | 181,136 | 34,153 | 455,676 | 639,672 | 178,072 | 29,135 | 432,465 | |
| Off-balance sheet | |||||||||
| Contingent liabilities | 42,538 | – | – | 42,538 | 43,521 | – | – | 43,521 | |
| Undrawn irrevocable standby facilities, credit lines and other commitments to lend5 |
68,222 | – | – | 68,222 | 63,890 | – | – | 63,890 | |
| Documentary credits and short-term trade-related transactions |
4,021 | – | – | 4,021 | 3,880 | – | – | 3,880 | |
| Total off-balance sheet | 114,781 | – | – | 114,781 | 111,291 | – | – | 111,291 | |
| Total | 785,746 | 181,136 | 34,153 | 570,457 | 750,963 | 178,072 | 29,135 | 543,756 |
1 An analysis of credit quality is set out in the credit quality analysis section (page 33). Further details of collateral held by client segment and stage are set out in the collateral analysis section (page 48)
2 Equity shares are excluded as they are not subject to credit risk
3 The Group enters into master netting agreements, which in the event of default result in a single amount owed by or to the counterparty through netting the sum of the positive and negative mark-to-market values of applicable derivative transactions
4 Other assets include Hong Kong certifi cates of indebtedness, cash collateral, and acceptances, in addition to unsettled trades and other fi nancial assets
5 Excludes unconditionally cancellable facilities
6 Collateral capped at maximum exposure (over-collateralised)
Maximum exposure to credit risk
| 31.12.17 (IAS 39) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Credit risk management | ||||
| Maximum exposure \$million |
Collateral \$million |
Master netting agreements \$million |
Net exposure \$million |
|
| On-balance sheet | ||||
| Cash and balances at central banks | 58,864 | – | – | 58,864 |
| Loans and advances to customers held at:1 | 251,625 | |||
| Fair value through profi t or loss | 2,918 | |||
| Amortised cost | 248,707 | |||
| Loans and advances to banks held at:1 | 60,066 | |||
| Fair value through profi t or loss | 2,572 | |||
| Amortised cost | 57,494 | |||
| Total loans and advances to banks and customers | 311,691 | 113,060 | – | 198,631 |
| Reverse repurchase agreements and other secured lending6 | 55,187 | 55,187 | – | – |
| Fair value through profi t or loss | 912 | |||
| Amortised cost | 54,275 | |||
| Investment securities | 135,842 | – | – | 135,842 |
| As per balance sheet | 117,025 | – | – | 117,025 |
| Fair value through profi t or loss | 21,162 | – | – | 21,162 |
| Less: equity securities2 | (2,345) | – | – | (2,345) |
| Derivative fi nancial instruments3 | 47,031 | 9,825 | 29,135 | 8,071 |
| Accrued income | 1,947 | – | – | 1,947 |
| Assets held for sale | 2 | – | – | 2 |
| Other assets4 | 29,922 | – | – | 29,922 |
| Total balance sheet | 640,486 | 178,072 | 29,135 | 433,279 |
| Off-balance sheet | ||||
| Contingent liabilities | 43,521 | – | – | 43,521 |
| Undrawn irrevocable standby facilities, credit lines and other commitments to lend5 |
63,890 | – | – | 63,890 |
| Documentary credits and short-term trade-related transactions | 3,880 | – | – | 3,880 |
| Total off-balance sheet | 111,291 | – | – | 111,291 |
| Total | 751,777 | 178,072 | 29,135 | 544,570 |
1 An analysis of credit quality is set out in the credit quality analysis section (page 33). Further details of collateral held by client segment and stage are set out in the collateral analysis section (page 48)
2 Equity shares are excluded as they are not subject to credit risk
3 The Group enters into master netting agreements, which in the event of default result in a single amount owed by or to the counterparty through netting the sum of the positive and negative mark-to-market values of applicable derivative transactions
4 Other assets include Hong Kong certifi cates of indebtedness, cash collateral and acceptances, in addition to unsettled trades and other fi nancial assets
5 Excludes unconditionally cancellable facilities
6 Collateral capped at maximum exposure (over-collateralised)
Analysis of fi nancial instrument by stage
This table shows fi nancial instruments and off-balance sheet commitments by stage with total loss provision against each fi nancial instrument class.
Total credit impairment provisions decreased by \$1.0 billion in the fi rst half of 2018, refl ecting lower stage 3 provisions largely due to write-offs within the Corporate & Institutional Banking portfolio.
| 30.06.18 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stage 1 | Stage 2 Stage 3 |
Total | ||||||||||
| Gross balance1 \$million |
Total credit impairment \$million |
Net carrying value \$million |
Gross balance1 \$million |
Total credit impairment \$million |
Net carrying value \$million |
Gross balance1 \$million |
Total credit impairment \$million |
Net carrying value \$million |
Gross balance1 \$million |
Total credit impairment \$million |
Net carrying value \$million |
|
| Loans and advances to customers (excluding FVTPL)2 |
235,063 | (435) 234,628 | 21,844 | (470) | 21,374 | 7,728 | (4,399) | 3,329 | 264,635 | (5,304)259,331 | ||
| Loans and advances to customers (FVTPL)3 |
37,388 | |||||||||||
| Total loans and advances to customers |
235,063 | (435) 234,628 | 21,844 | (470) | 21,374 | 7,728 | (4,399) | 3,329 | 264,635 | (5,304)296,719 | ||
| Loans and advances to banks (excluding FVTPL)2 |
62,448 | (4) | 62,444 | 1,712 | (3) | 1,709 | – | – | – | 64,160 | (7) 64,153 | |
| Loans and advances to banks (FVTPL)3 |
21,206 | |||||||||||
| Total loans and advances to banks |
62,448 | (4) | 62,444 | 1,712 | (3) | 1,709 | – | – | – | 64,160 | (7) 85,359 | |
| Debt securities and other eligible bills – amortised cost |
6,451 | (5) | 6,446 | 431 | (19) | 412 | 216 | (208) | 8 | 7,098 | (232) | 6,866 |
| Debt securities and other eligible bills – FVOCI4 |
109,550 | (26) | 6,411 | (30) | 4 | – | 115,965 | (56) | ||||
| Total debt securities and other eligible bills |
116,001 | (31) | 6,842 | (49) | 220 | (208) | 123,063 | (288) | ||||
| Undrawn commitments5 |
128,422 | (45) | 12,592 | (68) | – | – | 141,014 | (113) | ||||
| Financial guarantees5 |
28,814 | (7) | 3,363 | (64) | 571 | (87) | 32,748 | (158) | ||||
| Total undrawn commitment and fi nancial guarantees |
157,236 | (52) | 15,955 | (132) | 571 | (87) | 173,762 | (271) | ||||
| Total | 570,748 | (522) | 46,353 | (654) | 8,519 | (4,694) | 625,620 | (5,870) |
1 Gross carrying amount for off-balance sheet refers to notional values
2 Loans and advances include reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending for \$4,231 million under 'Customers' and for \$8,550 million under 'Banks'
3 Loans and advances include reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending for \$33,678 million under 'Customers' and for \$17,962 million under 'Banks'
4 These instruments are held at fair value on the balance sheet. The expected credit loss provision in respect of debt securities measured at FVOCI is held within reserves
5 These are off-balance sheet instruments. Only the expected credit loss is recorded on balance sheet as a fi nancial liability and therefore there is no 'net carrying amount'. expected credit loss provision on off-balance sheet instruments are held as liability provisions to the extent that the drawn and undrawn components of loan exposures can be separately identifi ed. Otherwise they will be reported against the drawn component
| 01.01.18 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | |||||||||
| Gross balance1 \$million |
Total credit impairment \$million |
Net carrying value \$million |
Gross balance1 \$million |
Total credit impairment \$million |
Net carrying value \$million |
Gross balance1 \$million |
Total credit impairment \$million |
Net carrying value \$million |
Gross balance1 \$million |
Total credit impairment \$million |
Net carrying value \$million |
|
| Loans and advances to customers (excluding FVTPL)2 |
228,485 | (472) 228,013 | 20,585 | (576) | 20,009 | 8,769 | (5,282) | 3,487 | 257,839 | (6,330) 251,509 | ||
| Loans and advances to customers (FVTPL)3 |
33,268 | |||||||||||
| Total loans and advances to customers |
228,485 | (472) 228,013 | 20,585 | (576) | 20,009 | 8,769 | (5,282) | 3,487 | 257,839 | (6,330) 284,777 | ||
| Loans and advances to banks (excluding FVTPL)2 |
59,926 | (6) | 59,920 | 2,370 | (2) | 2,368 | 9 | (4) | 5 | 62,305 | (12) | 62,293 |
| Loans and advances to banks (FVTPL)3 |
19,022 | |||||||||||
| Total loans and advances to banks |
59,926 | (6) | 59,920 | 2,370 | (2) | 2,368 | 9 | (4) | 5 | 62,305 | (12) | 81,315 |
| Debt securities and other eligible bills – amortised cost4 |
6,204 | (3) | 6,201 | 995 | (16) | 979 | 221 | (213) | 8 | 7,420 | (232) | 7,188 |
| Debt securities and other eligible bills – FVOCI5 |
101,104 | (23) | 7,307 | (42) | – | – | 108,411 | (65) | ||||
| Total debt securities and other eligible bills 107,308 |
(26) | 8,302 | (58) | 221 | (213) | 115,831 | (297) | |||||
| Undrawn commitments6 |
147,007 | (66) | 15,240 | (90) | – | – | 162,247 | (156) | ||||
| Financial guarantees6 |
24,391 | (6) | 4,795 | (16) | 199 | (77) | 29,385 | (99) | ||||
| Total undrawn commitment and fi nancial guarantees |
171,398 | (72) | 20,035 | (106) | 199 | (77) | 191,632 | (255) | ||||
| Total | 567,117 | (576) | 51,292 | (742) | 9,198 | (5,576) | 627,607 | (6,894) | ||||
1 Gross carrying amount for off-balance sheet refers to notional values
2 Loans and advances include reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending for \$4,568 million under 'Customers' and for \$5,099 million under 'Banks'
3 Loans and advances include reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending for \$29,361 million under 'Customers' and for \$16,157 million under 'Banks'
4 Stage 3 Gross balance and Total credit impairment of debt securities and other eligible bills – amortised cost has increased by \$208 million, with no impact on net carrying value. The balances have been restated to present securities with zero carrying value previously classifi ed as available for sale under IAS 39 on a gross basis as required under IFRS 9
5 These instruments are held at fair value on the balance sheet. The expected credit loss provision in respect of debt securities measured at FVOCI is held within reserves
6 These are off-balance sheet instruments. Only the expected credit loss is recorded on balance sheet as a fi nancial liability and therefore there is no 'net carrying amount'. Expected credit loss provisions on off-balance sheet instruments are held as liability provisions to the extent that the drawn and undrawn components of loan exposures can be separately identifi ed. Otherwise they will be reported against the drawn component
Credit quality analysis
Credit quality by client segment
For Corporate and Institutional Banking and Commercial Banking portfolios, exposures are analysed by credit grade (CG), which plays a central role in the quality assessment and monitoring of risk (page 34). All loans are assigned a CG, which is reviewed periodically and amended in light of changes in the borrower's circumstances or behaviour. CG 1 to 12 are assigned to stage 1 and stage 2 (performing) clients or accounts, while CG 13 and 14 are assigned to stage 3 (non-performing or defaulted) clients. The mapping of credit quality is as follows:
Mapping of credit quality
The Group uses the following internal risk mapping to determine the credit quality for loans.
| Corporate & Institutional Banking and Commercial Banking | Private Banking | Retail Banking | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Credit quality description | Default grade mapping |
S&P external ratings equivalent |
Regulatory PD range | Internal ratings | Number of days past due |
| Strong | Grades 1-5 | AAA/AA+ to BB+/BBB |
0.000-0.425 | Class I and Class IV | Current loans (no past dues nor impaired) |
| Satisfactory | Grades 6-8 | BB+ to BB-/B+ | 0.426-2.350 | Class II and Class III | Loans past due till 29 days |
| Grades 9-11 | B+/B to B-/CCC | 2.351-15.750 | |||
| Higher Risk | Grade 12 | B-/CCC | 15.751-50.000 | GSAM managed | Past due loans 30 days and over till 90 days |
The table overleaf sets out the gross loans and advances held at amortised cost, expected credit loss provisions and expected credit loss coverage by business segment and stage.
Within Corporate & Institutional Banking, the proportion of stage 1 accounts rated as 'Strong' increased from 58 per cent to 65 per cent due to the focus on investment grade origination. Stage 2 accounts fell \$1.0 billion to \$12.6 billion. Within this, early alert balances fell \$1.3 billion and higher-risk accounts declined by \$312 million to \$816 million due to lower levels of infl ows into this category.
For Retail Banking, the majority of the portfolio remains in the 'Strong' credit quality Stage 1 category (95 per cent of total Retail Banking portfolio). Stage 2 balances remain at 2.5 per cent of total Retail Banking loans and advances, of which 60 per cent are 'Strong' credit quality. Stage 3 remains broadly stable compared to the beginning of the year.
Commercial Banking saw the proportion of stage 2 assets increasing from 14 per cent of total loans to 21 per cent. However, higher-risk stage 2 accounts fell by \$102 million due to repayments and reduced infl ows.
Expected credit loss coverage ratios have remained broadly in line with 1 January 2018, except for higher-risk stage 2 accounts, which have fallen from 12 per cent to 9.3 per cent. The Group overall stage 3 cover ratio declined to 57 per cent (1 January 2018: 60 per cent) refl ecting a small number of write-offs from the Corporate & Institutional Banking ongoing business and liquidation portfolio.
By client segment
| 30.06.18 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loans to customers | |||||||
| Amortised cost | Loans to banks \$million |
Corporate & Institutional Banking \$million |
Retail Banking \$million |
Commercial Banking \$million |
Private Banking \$million |
Central & other items \$million |
Total \$million |
| Gross loans | |||||||
| Stage 1 | 62,448 | 92,313 | 98,504 | 21,455 | 13,035 | 9,756 | 235,063 |
| – Strong | 50,939 | 59,603 | 96,770 | 7,044 | 9,457 | 9,663 | 182,537 |
| – Satisfactory | 11,509 | 32,710 | 1,734 | 14,411 | 3,578 | 93 | 52,526 |
| Stage 2 | 1,712 | 12,618 | 2,573 | 6,231 | 422 | – | 21,844 |
| – Strong | 269 | 1,973 | 1,540 | 166 | 308 | – | 3,987 |
| – Satisfactory | 1,431 | 9,829 | 524 | 5,844 | 10 | – | 16,207 |
| – Higher-risk | 12 | 816 | 509 | 221 | 104 | – | 1,650 |
| Of which (stage 2): | |||||||
| – Less than 30 days past due | – | 929 | 524 | 295 | 10 | – | 1,758 |
| – More than 30 days past due | – | 69 | 509 | 92 | 4 | – | 674 |
| Stage 3, credit-impaired fi nancial assets | - | 4,686 | 800 | 2,030 | 212 | – | 7,728 |
| Total1 | 64,160 | 109,617 | 101,877 | 29,716 | 13,669 | 9,756 | 264,635 |
| Expected credit loss provisions | |||||||
| Stage 1 | (4) | (58) | (332) | (38) | (7) | – | (435) |
| – Strong | (2) | (22) | (185) | (22) | (6) | – | (235) |
| – Satisfactory | (2) | (36) | (147) | (16) | (1) | – | (200) |
| Stage 2 | (3) | (243) | (156) | (70) | (1) | – | (470) |
| – Strong | (3) | (12) | (27) | – | (1) | – | (40) |
| – Satisfactory | – | (144) | (80) | (53) | – | – | (277) |
| – Higher-risk | – | (87) | (49) | (17) | – | – | (153) |
| Of which (stage 2): | |||||||
| – Less than 30 days past due | (1) | (63) | (80) | (40) | – | – | (183) |
| – More than 30 days past due | (2) | (15) | (49) | – | – | – | (64) |
| Stage 3, credit-impaired fi nancial assets | – | (2,536) | (372) | (1,395) | (96) | – | (4,399) |
| Total | (7) | (2,837) | (860) | (1,503) | (104) | – | (5,304) |
| Coverage | |||||||
| Stage 1 | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.1% | – | 0.2% |
| – Strong | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.1% | – | 0.1% |
| – Satisfactory | 0.0% | 0.1% | 8.5% | 0.1% | 0.0% | – | 0.4% |
| Stage 2 | 0.2% | 1.9% | 6.1% | 1.1% | 0.2% | – | 2.2% |
| – Strong | 1.1% | 0.6% | 1.8% | – | 0.3% | – | 1.0% |
| – Satisfactory | – | 1.5% | 15.3% | 0.9% | – | – | 1.7% |
| – Higher-risk | – | 10.7% | 9.6% | 7.7% | – | – | 9.3% |
| Of which (stage 2): | |||||||
| – Less than 30 days past due | 0.0% | 6.8% | 15.3% | 13.6% | – | – | 10.4% |
| – More than 30 days past due | 0.0% | 21.7% | 9.6% | – | – | – | 9.5% |
| Stage 3, credit-impaired fi nancial assets | – | 54.1% | 46.5% | 68.7% | 45.3% | – | 56.9% |
| Fair value through profi t or loss | |||||||
| Performing | 21,206 | 36,452 | 513 | 346 | – | – | 37,311 |
| – Strong | 20,118 | 31,620 | 497 | 35 | – | – | 32,152 |
| – Satisfactory | 1,065 | 4,828 | 12 | 311 | – | – | 5,151 |
| – Higher-risk | 23 | 4 | 4 | – | – | – | 8 |
| Impaired | – | 65 | – | 12 | – | – | 77 |
| Total2 | 21,206 | 36,517 | 513 | 358 | – | – | 37,388 |
| Net loans and advances | 85,359 | 143,297 | 101,530 | 28,571 | 13,565 | 9,756 | 296,719 |
1 Loans and advances include reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending for \$4,231 million under 'Customers' and for \$8,550 million under 'Banks'
2 Loans and advances include reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending for \$33,678 million under 'Customers' and for \$17,962 million under 'Banks'
| 01.01.18 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loans to customers | |||||||
| Amortised cost | Loans to banks \$million |
Corporate & Institutional Banking \$million |
Retail Banking \$million |
Commercial Banking \$million |
Private Banking \$million |
Central & other items \$million |
Total \$million |
| Gross loans | |||||||
| Stage 1 | 59,926 | 83,575 | 99,971 | 23,130 | 12,481 | 9,328 | 228,485 |
| – Strong | 50,820 | 48,638 | 98,721 | 5,573 | 8,527 | 9,240 | 170,699 |
| – Satisfactory | 9,106 | 34,937 | 1,250 | 17,557 | 3,954 | 88 | 57,786 |
| Stage 2 | 2,370 | 13,641 | 2,186 | 4,023 | 735 | – | 20,585 |
| – Strong | 1,940 | 4,400 | 1,432 | 394 | 693 | – | 6,919 |
| – Satisfactory | 376 | 8,113 | 349 | 3,306 | – | – | 11,768 |
| – Higher-risk | 54 | 1,128 | 405 | 323 | 42 | – | 1,898 |
| Of which (stage 2): | |||||||
| – Less than 30 days past due | 246 | 493 | 347 | 153 | – | – | 993 |
| – More than 30 days past due | 25 | 232 | 407 | 123 | 5 | – | 767 |
| Stage 3, credit-impaired fi nancial assets | 9 | 5,788 | 818 | 1,956 | 207 | – | 8,769 |
| Total1 | 62,305 | 103,004 | 102,975 | 29,109 | 13,423 | 9,328 | 257,839 |
| Expected credit loss provisions | |||||||
| Stage 1 | (6) | (65) | (370) | (25) | (8) | (4) | (472) |
| – Strong | (4) | (12) | (324) | (5) | (8) | (4) | (353) |
| – Satisfactory | (2) | (53) | (46) | (20) | – | – | (119) |
| Stage 2 | (2) | (326) | (170) | (79) | (1) | – | (576) |
| – Strong | (2) | (14) | (84) | – | (1) | – | (99) |
| – Satisfactory | – | (165) | (25) | (59) | – | – | (249) |
| – Higher-risk | – | (147) | (61) | (20) | – | – | (228) |
| Of which (stage 2): | |||||||
| – Less than 30 days past due | – | (65) | (24) | (28) | – | – | (117) |
| – More than 30 days past due | – | (71) | (61) | (14) | – | – | (146) |
| Stage 3, credit-impaired fi nancial assets | (4) | (3,433) | (389) | (1,369) | (91) | – | (5,282) |
| Total | (12) | (3,824) | (929) | (1,473) | (100) | (4) | (6,330) |
| Coverage | |||||||
| Stage 1 | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.4% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.2% |
| – Strong | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.2% |
| – Satisfactory | 0.0% | 0.2% | 3.7% | 0.1% | – | – | 0.2% |
| Stage 2 | 0.1% | 2.4% | 7.8% | 2.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 2.8% |
| – Strong | 0.1% | 0.3% | 5.9% | 0.0% | 0.1% | – | 1.4% |
| – Satisfactory | – | 2.0% | 7.2% | 1.8% | – | – | 2.1% |
| – Higher-risk | – | 13.0% | 15.1% | 6.2% | – | – | 12.0% |
| Of which (stage 2): | |||||||
| – Less than 30 days past due | – | 13.2% | 6.9% | 18.3% | – | – | 11.8% |
| – More than 30 days past due | – | 30.6% | 15.0% | 11.4% | – | – | 19.0% |
| Stage 3, credit-impaired fi nancial assets | 44.4% | 59.3% | 47.6% | 70.0% | 44.0% | 0.0% | 60.2% |
| Fair value through profi t or loss | |||||||
| Performing | 19,022 | 32,209 | 539 | 457 | – | – | 33,205 |
| – Strong | 16,199 | 22,647 | 539 | 100 | – | – | 23,286 |
| – Satisfactory | 2,823 | 9,555 | – | 357 | – | – | 9,912 |
| – Higher-risk | – | 7 | – | – | – | – | 7 |
| Impaired | – | 59 | – | 4 | – | – | 63 |
| Total2 | 19,022 | 32,268 | 539 | 461 | – | – | 33,268 |
| Net loans and advances | 81,315 | 131,448 | 102,585 | 28,097 | 13,323 | 9,324 | 284,777 |
2 Loans and advances include reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending for \$29,361 million under 'Customers' and for \$16,157 million under 'Banks'
By client segment
| 31.12.17 (IAS 39) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loans to customers | |||||||
| Loans to banks1 \$million |
Corporate & Institutional Banking \$million |
Retail Banking \$million |
Commercial Banking \$million |
Private Banking \$million |
Central & other items \$million |
Total1 \$million |
|
| Performing loans | |||||||
| – Strong | 68,958 | 75,672 | 100,687 | 6,072 | 9,220 | 9,253 | 200,904 |
| – Satisfactory | 12,309 | 52,610 | 1,586 | 21,216 | 3,951 | 90 | 79,453 |
| – Higher-risk | 54 | 1,128 | 405 | 323 | 42 | – | 1,898 |
| 81,321 | 129,410 | 102,678 | 27,611 | 13,213 | 9,343 | 282,255 | |
| Impaired forborne loans, net of provisions | – | – | 269 | – | – | – | 269 |
| Non-performing loans, net of provisions | 5 | 2,484 | 274 | 596 | 140 | – | 3,494 |
| Total loans | 81,326 | 131,894 | 103,221 | 28,207 | 13,353 | 9,343 | 286,018 |
| Portfolio impairment provision | (1) | (156) | (208) | (99) | (2) | – | (465) |
| Total net loans | 81,325 | 131,738 | 103,013 | 28,108 | 13,351 | 9,343 | 285,553 |
| The following table further analyses total loans included within the table above Included in performing loans |
|||||||
| Neither past due nor impaired | |||||||
| – Strong | 68,740 | 75,482 | 100,687 | 6,058 | 9,220 | 9,251 | 200,698 |
| – Satisfactory | 12,255 | 51,846 | – | 20,831 | 3,866 | 90 | 76,633 |
| – Higher-risk | 54 | 899 | – | 239 | 42 | – | 1,180 |
| 81,049 | 128,227 | 100,687 | 27,128 | 13,128 | 9,341 | 278,511 | |
| Past due but not impaired | |||||||
| – Up to 30 days past due | 247 | 951 | 1,586 | 360 | 69 | – | 2,966 |
| – 31-60 days past due | 25 | 32 | 278 | 49 | 16 | – | 375 |
| – 61-90 days past due | – | 200 | 127 | 74 | – | 2 | 403 |
| 272 | 1,183 | 1,991 | 483 | 85 | 2 | 3,744 | |
| Total performing loans | 81,321 | 129,410 | 102,678 | 27,611 | 13,213 | 9,343 | 282,255 |
| Of which, forborne loans amounting to | 2 | 480 | 84 | 31 | – | – | 595 |
| Included in non-performing loans | |||||||
| Past due but not impaired | |||||||
| – 91-120 days past due | – | – | 67 | – | – | – | 67 |
| – 121-150 days past due | – | – | 56 | – | – | – | 56 |
| – | – | 123 | – | – | – | 123 | |
| Individually impaired loans, net of provisions | 5 | 2,484 | 151 | 596 | 140 | – | 3,371 |
| Total non-performing loans | 5 | 2,484 | 274 | 596 | 140 | – | 3,494 |
| Of the above, forborne loans | 4 | 861 | 268 | 186 | – | – | 1,315 |
| The following table sets out loans held at fair value through profi t and loss which are included within the table above | |||||||
| Neither past due nor impaired | |||||||
| – Strong | 2,081 | 1,451 | – | 30 | – | – | 1,481 |
| – Satisfactory | 1,056 | 1,572 | – | 186 | – | – | 1,758 |
| – Higher-risk | – | 7 | – | – | – | – | 7 |
| 3,137 | 3,030 | – | 216 | – | – | 3,246 | |
| Individually impaired loans | – | 19 | – | – | – | – | 19 |
| Total loans held at fair value through profi t and loss | 3,137 | 3,049 | – | 216 | – | – | 3,265 |
1 Loans and advances include reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending for \$55,187 million
Credit quality by geographic region (unaudited)
The following table sets out the credit quality for gross loans and advances to customers and banks, held at amortised cost, by geographic region and stage.
Loans and advances to customers
| 30.06.18 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greater China & North Asia \$million |
ASEAN & South Asia \$million |
Africa & Middle East \$million |
Europe & Americas \$million |
Total \$million |
|
| Loans classifi ed as | |||||
| Stage 1 | 119,419 | 70,672 | 24,231 | 20,741 | 235,063 |
| Stage 2 | 6,761 | 7,752 | 5,145 | 2,186 | 21,844 |
| Total stage 1 and stage 2 loans | 126,180 | 78,424 | 29,376 | 22,927 | 256,907 |
| Stage 3, credit-impaired fi nancial assets2 | 821 | 3,322 | 2,715 | 870 | 7,728 |
| Total loans1 | 127,001 | 81,746 | 32,091 | 23,797 | 264,635 |
| 01.01.18 | |||||
| Greater China & North Asia \$million |
ASEAN & South Asia \$million |
Africa & Middle East \$million |
Europe & Americas \$million |
Total \$million |
|
| Loans classifi ed as | |||||
| Stage 1 | 114,990 | 70,594 | 23,120 | 19,781 | 228,485 |
| Stage 2 | 5,796 | 7,578 | 4,762 | 2,449 | 20,585 |
| Total stage 1 and stage 2 loans | 120,786 | 78,172 | 27,882 | 22,230 | 249,070 |
| Stage 3, credit-impaired fi nancial assets2 | 806 | 4,248 | 2,657 | 1,058 | 8,769 |
| Total loans1 | 121,592 | 82,420 | 30,539 | 23,288 | 257,839 |
1 Amounts gross of expected credit losses
2 Amounts do not include those purchased or originated credit-impaired fi nancial assets
| 31.12.17 (IAS 39) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greater China & North Asia \$million |
ASEAN & South Asia \$million |
Africa & Middle East \$million |
Europe & Americas \$million |
Total \$million |
|
| Neither past due nor individually impaired | 125,565 | 79,175 | 27,774 | 45,997 | 278,511 |
| Past due but not individually impaired | 809 | 1,711 | 1,153 | 194 | 3,867 |
| Individually impaired | 806 | 4,233 | 2,654 | 1,184 | 8,877 |
| Individual impairment provision | (312) | (2,361) | (1,858) | (706) | (5,237) |
| Portfolio impairment provision | (129) | (179) | (121) | (36) | (465) |
| Total1 | 126,739 | 82,579 | 29,602 | 46,633 | 285,553 |
1 Excludes impairment charges relating to debt securities classifi ed as loans and receivables, refer to Note 7 of the fi nancial statements for details (page 95)
Loans and advances to banks
| 30.06.18 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greater China & North Asia \$million |
ASEAN & South Asia \$million |
Africa & Middle East \$million |
Europe & Americas \$million |
Total \$million |
||||||
| Loans classifi ed as | ||||||||||
| Stage 1 | 29,772 | 12,079 | 4,384 | 16,213 | 62,448 | |||||
| Stage 2 | 266 | 528 | 472 | 446 | 1,712 | |||||
| Total stage 1 and stage 2 loans | 30,038 | 12,607 | 4,856 | 16,659 | 64,160 | |||||
| Stage 3, credit-impaired fi nancial assets2 | – | – | – | – | – | |||||
| Total loans1 | 30,038 | 12,607 | 4,856 | 16,659 | 64,160 | |||||
| 01.01.18 | ||||||||||
| Greater China & North Asia \$million |
ASEAN & South Asia \$million |
Africa & Middle East \$million |
Europe & Americas \$million |
Total \$million |
||||||
| Loans classifi ed as | ||||||||||
| Stage 1 | 28,792 | 11,853 | 4,425 | 14,856 | 59,926 | |||||
| Stage 2 | 1,212 | 557 | 169 | 432 | 2,370 | |||||
| Total stage 1 and stage 2 loans | 30,004 | 12,410 | 4,594 | 15,288 | 62,296 | |||||
| Stage 3, credit-impaired fi nancial assets2 | – | – | – | 9 | 9 | |||||
| Total loans1 | 30,004 | 12,410 | 4,594 | 15,297 | 62,305 |
1 Amounts gross of expected credit losses
2 Amounts do not include those purchased or originated credit-impaired fi nancial asset
| 31.12.17 (IAS 39) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greater China & North Asia \$million |
ASEAN & South Asia \$million |
Africa & Middle East \$million |
Europe & Americas \$million |
Total \$million |
||||
| Neither past due nor individually impaired | 33,096 | 16,482 | 7,328 | 24,143 | 81,049 | |||
| Past due but not individually impaired | 130 | 41 | 101 | – | 272 | |||
| Individually impaired | – | – | – | 9 | 9 | |||
| Individual impairment provision | – | – | – | (4) | (4) | |||
| Portfolio impairment provision | – | – | (1) | – | (1) | |||
| Total1 | 33,226 | 16,523 | 7,428 | 24,148 | 81,325 |
1 Excludes impairment charges relating to debt securities classifi ed as loans and receivables, refer to Note 7 of the fi nancial statements for details (page 95)
Credit quality by industry (unaudited)
This section provides an analysis of the Group's amortised cost portfolio by industry on a gross, total credit impairment and net basis.
| 30.06.18 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | |||||||||
| Gross carrying amount \$million |
Total credit impairment \$million |
Net carrying amount \$million |
Gross carrying amount \$million |
Total credit impairment \$million |
Net carrying amount \$million |
Gross carrying amount \$million |
Total credit impairment \$million |
Net carrying amount \$million |
Gross carrying amount \$million |
Total credit impairment \$million |
Net carrying amount \$million |
|
| Industry: | ||||||||||||
| Energy | 15,699 | (16) | 15,683 | 2,783 | (71) | 2,712 | 962 | (770) | 192 | 19,444 | (857) | 18,587 |
| Manufacturing | 20,025 | (11) | 20,014 | 3,220 | (73) | 3,147 | 827 | (676) | 151 | 24,072 | (760) | 23,312 |
| Financing, insurance and non-banking |
21,783 | (9) | 21,774 | 1,242 | (9) | 1,233 | 348 | (143) | 205 | 23,373 | (161) | 23,212 |
| Transport, telecom and utilities |
13,567 | (12) | 13,555 | 2,735 | (59) | 2,676 | 757 | (401) | 356 | 17,059 | (472) | 16,587 |
| Food and household products |
6,930 | (6) | 6,924 | 2,258 | (20) | 2,238 | 781 | (356) | 425 | 9,969 | (382) | 9,587 |
| Commercial real estate |
13,232 | (16) | 13,216 | 1,466 | (24) | 1,442 | 330 | (50) | 280 | 15,028 | (90) | 14,938 |
| Mining and quarrying |
4,994 | (9) | 4,985 | 1,239 | (21) | 1,218 | 684 | (365) | 319 | 6,917 | (395) | 6,522 |
| Consumer durables |
7,260 | (5) | 7,255 | 1,733 | (11) | 1,722 | 649 | (359) | 290 | 9,642 | (375) | 9,267 |
| Construction | 2,355 | (3) | 2,352 | 793 | (14) | 779 | 725 | (450) | 275 | 3,873 | (467) | 3,406 |
| Trading companies & distributors |
1,744 | (2) | 1,742 | 370 | (2) | 368 | 423 | (217) | 206 | 2,537 | (221) | 2,316 |
| Government | 11,622 | (1) | 11,621 | 81 | – | 81 | – | – | – | 11,703 | (1) | 11,702 |
| Other | 4,313 | (6) | 4,307 | 929 | (9) | 920 | 230 | (144) | 86 | 5,472 | (159) | 5,313 |
| Retail Products: | ||||||||||||
| Mortgages | 75,406 | (18) | 75,388 | 1,254 | (6) | 1,248 | 359 | (121) | 238 | 77,019 | (145) | 76,874 |
| CCPL and other unsecured lending |
15,350 | (288) | 15,062 | 1,206 | (144) | 1,062 | 410 | (225) | 185 | 16,966 | (657) | 16,309 |
| Auto | 643 | (2) | 641 | 5 | – | 5 | 1 | – | 1 | 649 | (2) | 647 |
| Secured wealth products |
17,130 | (21) | 17,109 | 424 | (3) | 421 | 202 | (114) | 88 | 17,756 | (138) | 17,618 |
| Other | 3,010 | (10) | 3,000 | 106 | (4) | 102 | 40 | (8) | 32 | 3,156 | (22) | 3,134 |
| Loans and advances to customers1 |
235,063 | (435) 234,628 | 21,844 | (470) | 21,374 | 7,728 | (4,399) | 3,329 | 264,635 | (5,304) 259,331 | ||
| Loans and advances to banks2 |
62,448 | (4) | 62,444 | 1,712 | (3) | 1,709 | – | – | – | 64,160 | (7) | 64,153 |
| Total3 | 297,511 | (439) 297,072 | 23,556 | (473) 23,083 | 7,728 | (4,399) | 3,329 | 328,795 | (5,311) 323,484 |
1 Includes reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending held at amortised cost of \$4,231 million
2 Includes reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending held at amortised cost of \$8,550 million
3 Excludes loans held at fair value through profi t or loss
| 01.01.2018 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | |||||||||
| Gross carrying amount \$million |
Total credit impairment \$million |
Net carrying amount \$million |
Gross carrying amount \$million |
Total credit impairment \$million |
Net carrying amount \$million |
Gross carrying amount \$million |
Total credit impairment \$million |
Net carrying amount \$million |
Gross carrying amount \$million |
Total credit impairment \$million |
Net carrying amount \$million |
|
| Industry: | ||||||||||||
| Energy | 14,679 | (15) | 14,664 | 3,052 | (78) | 2,974 | 1,442 | (913) | 529 | 19,173 | (1,006) | 18,167 |
| Manufacturing | 18,848 | (9) | 18,839 | 3,254 | (77) | 3,177 | 801 | (614) | 187 | 22,903 | (700) | 22,203 |
| Financing, insurance and non-banking |
18,275 | (17) | 18,258 | 1,341 | (9) | 1,332 | 403 | (179) | 224 | 20,019 | (205) | 19,814 |
| Transport, telecom and utilities |
12,482 | (11) | 12,471 | 3,031 | (89) | 2,942 | 753 | (397) | 356 | 16,266 | (497) | 15,769 |
| Food and household products |
7,707 | (7) | 7,700 | 1,933 | (41) | 1,892 | 757 | (423) | 334 | 10,397 | (471) | 9,926 |
| Commercial real estate |
13,452 | (16) | 13,436 | 919 | (41) | 878 | 385 | (44) | 341 | 14,756 | (101) | 14,655 |
| Mining and quarrying |
5,046 | (3) | 5,043 | 1,038 | (11) | 1,027 | 952 | (674) | 278 | 7,036 | (688) | 6,348 |
| Consumer durables | 7,108 | (4) | 7,104 | 1,155 | (18) | 1,137 | 728 | (553) | 175 | 8,991 | (575) | 8,416 |
| Construction | 2,546 | (3) | 2,543 | 792 | (31) | 761 | 786 | (493) | 293 | 4,124 | (527) | 3,597 |
| Trading companies & distributors |
1,862 | (1) | 1,861 | 290 | 2 | 292 | 463 | (336) | 127 | 2,615 | (335) | 2,280 |
| Government | 9,521 | (1) | 9,520 | 78 | (1) | 77 | 6 | (1) | 5 | 9,605 | (3) | 9,602 |
| Other | 4,507 | (7) | 4,500 | 781 | (11) | 770 | 268 | (175) | 93 | 5,556 | (193) | 5,363 |
| Retail Products: | ||||||||||||
| Mortgages | 77,858 | (8) | 77,850 | 758 | – | 758 | 280 | (131) | 149 | 78,896 | (139) | 78,757 |
| CCPL and other unsecured lending |
15,959 | (337) | 15,622 | 685 | (163) | 522 | 505 | (234) | 271 | 17,149 | (734) | 16,415 |
| Auto | 626 | (3) | 623 | 6 | (1) | 5 | 1 | – | 1 | 633 | (4) | 629 |
| Secured wealth products |
13,301 | (14) | 13,287 | 720 | (1) | 719 | 197 | (93) | 104 | 14,218 | (108) | 14,110 |
| Other | 4,708 | (16) | 4,692 | 752 | (6) | 746 | 42 | (22) | 20 | 5,502 | (44) | 5,458 |
| Loans and advances to customers1 |
228,485 | (472) 228,013 | 20,585 | (576) | 20,009 | 8,769 | (5,282) | 3,487 | 257,839 | (6,330) 251,509 | ||
| Loans and advances to banks2 |
59,926 | (6) | 59,920 | 2,370 | (2) | 2,368 | 9 | (4) | 5 | 62,305 | (12) | 62,293 |
| Total3 | 288,411 | (478) 287,933 | 22,955 | (578) | 22,377 | 8,778 | (5,286) | 3,492 | 320,144 | (6,342) 313,802 |
1 Includes reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending held at amortised cost of \$4,568 million
2 Includes reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending held at amortised cost of \$5,099 million
3 Excludes loans held at fair value through profi t or loss
| 31.12.2017 (IAS 39) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Movements in impairment | |||||||||
| Neither past due nor individually impaired \$million |
Past due but not individually impaired \$million |
Individually impaired \$million |
Individual impairment provision \$million |
Total \$million |
Individual impairment provision held as at 1 Jan 2017 \$million |
Net impairment charge/ (release) \$million |
Amounts written off/other movements \$million |
Individual impairment provision held as at 31 Dec 2017 \$million |
|
| Industry: | |||||||||
| Energy | 18,090 | 116 | 1,217 | (879) | 18,544 | 814 | 208 | (143) | 879 |
| Manufacturing | 22,085 | 397 | 860 | (611) | 22,731 | 644 | 250 | (283) | 611 |
| Financing, insurance and non-banking |
44,439 | 314 | 444 | (213) | 44,984 | 409 | 79 | (275) | 213 |
| Transport, telecom and utilities | 15,640 | 123 | 777 | (376) | 16,164 | 218 | 230 | (72) | 376 |
| Food and household products | 9,543 | 179 | 756 | (422) | 10,056 | 561 | 75 | (214) | 422 |
| Commercial real estate | 14,574 | 199 | 400 | (34) | 15,139 | 33 | 9 | (8) | 34 |
| Mining and quarrying | 6,063 | 64 | 1,297 | (783) | 6,641 | 1,140 | 26 | (383) | 783 |
| Consumer durables | 8,792 | 132 | 725 | (583) | 9,066 | 523 | 124 | (64) | 583 |
| Construction | 3,346 | 60 | 781 | (484) | 3,703 | 553 | 59 | (128) | 484 |
| Trading companies & distributors | 2,155 | 43 | 458 | (331) | 2,325 | 310 | 46 | (25) | 331 |
| Government | 14,390 | 25 | 6 | (1) | 14,420 | – | (1) | 2 | 1 |
| Other | 5,579 | 16 | 252 | (176) | 5,671 | 195 | 37 | (54) | 178 |
| Retail Products: | |||||||||
| Mortgages | 77,279 | 1,340 | 276 | (117) | 78,778 | 104 | 34 | (21) | 117 |
| CCPL and other unsecured lending |
16,700 | 610 | 360 | (135) | 17,535 | 140 | 398 | (405) | 133 |
| Auto | 588 | 45 | – | – | 633 | – | 1 | (1) | – |
| Secured wealth products | 13,969 | 57 | 198 | (70) | 14,154 | 4 | 28 | 38 | 70 |
| Other | 5,279 | 147 | 70 | (22) | 5,474 | 19 | 19 | (16) | 22 |
| Loans and advances to customers1 |
278,511 | 3,867 | 8,877 | (5,237) | 286,018 | ||||
| Individual impairment provision | 5,667 | 1,622 | (2,052) | 5,237 | |||||
| Portfolio impairment provision | (465) | 687 | (239) | 17 | 465 | ||||
| Total | 285,553 | 6,354 | 1,383 | (2,035) | 5,702 | ||||
| Loans and advances to banks2 |
81,049 | 272 | 9 | (4) | 81,326 | – | – | – | – |
| Individual impairment provision | 163 | – | (159) | 4 | |||||
| Portfolio impairment provision | (1) | 1 | – | – | 1 | ||||
| Total | 81,325 | 164 | – | (159) | 5 |
1 Includes loans held at fair value through profi t or loss of \$2,918 million and reverse repurchase agreements held at amortised cost of \$33,581 million and fair value through profi t or loss of \$347 million
2 Includes loans held at fair value through profi t or loss of \$2,572 million and reverse repurchase agreements held at amortised cost of \$20,694 million and fair value through profi t or loss of \$565 million
41
Movement in expected credit impairment for loans and advances to banks and customers
The table below sets out the movement in expected credit loss provisions by stage in respect of loan exposures relating to banks and customers. Loan exposures in this context means the balance sheet outstanding, together with undrawn committed facilities and undrawn cancellable facilities relating to overdrafts and credit cards.
The table is an aggregate of monthly movements. Transfers between stages are deemed to occur at the beginning of a month and therefore amounts transferred net to zero. The re-measurement of expected credit loss resulting from a change in stage is reported within the profi t and loss line of the stage in which they are transferred to.
| Amortised cost | Stage 1 \$million |
Stage 2 \$million |
Stage 3 \$million |
Total \$million |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Credit impairment provisions as reported on balance sheet | 478 | 578 | 5,286 | 6,342 |
| Credit impairment provisions as reported on undrawn commitments | 66 | 90 | – | 156 |
| Total credit impairment provisions as at 1 January1 | 544 | 668 | 5,286 | 6,498 |
| Exchange rate differences and other movements | (48) | 6 | (154) | (196) |
| Transfer across stages | 118 | (267) | 149 | – |
| Net profi t and loss (release)/charge2 | (130) | 134 | 154 | 158 |
| Unwinding of discount | – | – | (29) | (29) |
| Recoveries of amounts previously written off | – | – | 175 | 175 |
| Write offs | – | – | (1,182) | (1,182) |
| Total credit impairment provisions as at 30 June2 | 484 | 541 | 4,399 | 5,424 |
| Of which: | ||||
| Credit impairment provisions as reported on balance sheet | 439 | 473 | 4,399 | 5,311 |
| Credit impairment provisions as reported on undrawn commitments | 45 | 68 | – | 113 |
1 Includes reverse repurchase agreements and other similar lending
2 Total credit impairment charge of \$214 million reported in the income statement includes \$60 million charge in respect of fi nancial guarantees and a \$4 million release relating to debt securities which are not included here
Movement in gross exposures for loans and advances to banks and customers
| Stage 1 \$million |
Stage 2 \$million |
Stage 3 \$million |
Total \$million |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loan exposures as reported on balance sheet (amortised cost) | 288,411 | 22,955 | 8,778 | 320,144 |
| Undrawn commitments | 147,007 | 15,240 | – | 162,247 |
| Total loan exposures as at 1 January1 | 435,418 | 38,195 | 8,778 | 482,391 |
| Loan exposures as reported on balance sheet (amortised cost) | 297,511 | 23,556 | 7,728 | 328,795 |
| Undrawn commitments | 128,422 | 12,592 | – | 141,014 |
| Total loan exposures as at 30 June1 | 425,933 | 36,148 | 7,728 | 469,809 |
1 Includes reverse repurchase agreements and other similar lending
Loan exposures are 3 per cent lower than 1 January 2018, primarily refl ecting lower levels of undrawn commitments.
On-balance sheet loan exposures in stage 1 have increased by \$9.1 billion refl ecting growth in Financing, Insurance and non-banking clients within Corporate & Institutional Banking, together with higher levels of Secured wealth products in Retail Banking.
On-balance sheet loan exposure in stage 2 increased \$0.6 billion to \$23.6 billion.
Total loan exposures in stage 3 decreased 12 per cent (\$1.1 billion) to \$7.7 billion, primarily due to increased levels of write-offs and recoveries.
Problem credit management and provisioning
Credit impairment
The ongoing business credit impairment charge in Corporate & Institutional Banking of \$67 million for the fi rst half of 2018 is signifi cantly lower than the previous half in 2017. This was due to lower stage 3 impairment which was driven by lower losses particularly in ASEAN & South Asia and recoveries from a small number of major exposures in India and the Middle East.
Commercial Banking ongoing business credit impairment was at \$106 million, a decrease of 16 per cent from the second half of 2017 albeit higher than the fi rst half of 2017. Geographically, Africa & Middle East contributed to 60 per cent of the fi rst half credit impairment. The Group remains vigilant for emerging risks.
In the liquidation portfolio, there was a net release of \$70 million due to resolution of some of the assets as the disposal work out process progresses.
Retail Banking credit impairment reduced 41 per cent to \$119 million at June 2018 (H2 2017: \$202 million, H1 2017: \$172 million), mainly driven by continued improvement in portfolio shape and performance, particularly within the unsecured portfolios.
The following table provides details of the credit impairment charge for the period.
| 6 months ended | 6 months ended | 6 months ended | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30.06.18 | 31.12.171 | 30.06.171 | |
| \$million | \$million | \$million | |
| (IFRS 9) | (IAS 39) | (IAS 39) | |
| Ongoing business portfolio credit impairment | |||
| Corporate & Institutional Banking | 672 | 288 | 369 |
| Retail Banking | 119 | 202 | 172 |
| Commercial Banking | 106 | 126 | 42 |
| Private Banking | 1 | 1 | – |
| Credit impairment | 293 | 617 | 583 |
| Restructuring | |||
| Liquidation portfolio | (70) | 59 | 61 |
| Others | (9) | 31 | 11 |
| Credit impairment | (79) | 90 | 72 |
| Total credit impairment | 214 | 707 | 655 |
1 Prepared and disclosed on an IAS 39 basis
2 Credit impairment recovery of \$14 million in Central & Other items is included in Corporate & Institutional Banking
Forborne and other modifi ed loans
A forborne loan arises when a concession has been made to the contractual terms of a loan in response to a customer's fi nancial diffi culties. The table below presents stage 2 and stage 3 loans with forbearance measures by segment.
| 30.06.18 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loans to banks \$million |
Corporate & Institutional Banking \$million |
Retail Banking \$million |
Commercial Banking \$million |
Private Banking \$million |
Central & other items \$million |
Total \$million |
|
| All loans with forbearance measures | – | 2,202 | 385 | 709 | – | – | 3,296 |
| Credit impairment (stage 3) | – | (657) | (136) | (466) | – | – | (1,259) |
| Net balance | – | 1,545 | 249 | 243 | – | – | 2,037 |
| 01.01.18 | |||||||
| Loans to banks \$million |
Corporate & Institutional Banking \$million |
Retail Banking \$million |
Commercial Banking \$million |
Private Banking \$million |
Central & other items \$million |
Total \$million |
|
| All loans with forbearance measures | 6 | 2,143 | 797 | 612 | – | – | 3,558 |
| Credit impairment (stage 3) | – | (802) | (176) | (394) | – | – | (1,372) |
| Net balance | 6 | 1,341 | 621 | 218 | – | – | 2,186 |
| 31.12.17 (IAS 39) | |||||||
| Loans to banks \$million |
Corporate & Institutional Banking \$million |
Retail Banking \$million |
Commercial Banking \$million |
Private Banking \$million |
Central & other items \$million |
Total \$million |
|
| All loans with forbearance measures | 6 | 2,143 | 797 | 647 | – | – | 3,593 |
| Accumulated impairment | – | (802) | (176) | (430) | – | – | (1,408) |
| Net balance | 6 | 1,341 | 621 | 217 | – | – | 2,185 |
Credit impaired (stage 3) loans by client segment
Overall gross credit-impaired (stage 3) loans for the Group have decreased signifi cantly to \$7.7 billion (1 January 2018: \$8.8 billion) with signifi cant reductions in the liquidation portfolio as the Group continued to assertively manage down and exit the exposures.
Stage 3 loans in Corporate & Institutional Banking decreased by \$1.1 billion or 19 per cent compared with 1 January 2018. The reductions were largely due to recoveries and write-offs, coupled with a lower level of infl ows. The Corporate & Institutional Banking liquidation portfolio stage 3 loans reduced by \$0.6 billion (30 per cent) due to progress made in resolving and exiting accounts.
Stage 3 loans in Commercial Banking increased marginally by \$74 million (4 per cent) due to higher levels of infl ows. New infl ows were driven by a small number of exposures in Greater China & North Asia and Africa & Middle East with no specifi c industry concentration.
Stage 3 loans in Retail Banking remain broadly stable (30 June 2018: \$800 million and 1 January 2018: \$818 million).
Cover ratio
The cover ratio measures the proportion of stage 3 impairment provisions to gross stage 3 loans, and is a metric commonly used in considering impairment trends. This metric does not allow for variations in the composition of stage 3 loans and should be used in conjunction with other credit risk information provided, including the level of collateral cover.
By client segment, the cover ratio before collateral for Corporate & Institutional Banking reduced from 59 per cent to 54 per cent due to a small number of write-offs which had a high level of provisions. The cover ratio for Commercial Banking remained broadly stable at 69 per cent (1 January 2018: 70 per cent). The cover ratio for Retail Banking remained broadly stable at 47 per cent (1 January 2018: 48 per cent) and cover ratio including collateral improved to 79 per cent (1 January 2018: 74 per cent).
The Private Banking segment remains fully covered taking into account the collateral held.
The balance of stage 3 loans not covered by stage 3 impairment provisions represents the adjusted value of collateral held and the net outcome of any workout or recovery strategies.
Collateral provides risk mitigation to some degree in all client segments and supports the credit quality and cover ratio assessments post impairment provisions. Further information on collateral is provided in the credit risk mitigation section.
The table below presents the balance of the gross stage 3 loans to banks and customers, together with the provisions held, for all segments and the respective cover ratios. For the reconciliation between the non-performing loans under IAS 39 and under IFRS 9, refer to note 27.
| 30.06.18 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate & Institutional Banking \$million |
Retail Banking \$million |
Commercial Banking \$million |
Private Banking \$million |
Total \$million |
||||||
| Gross credit impaired1 | 4,686 | 800 | 2,030 | 212 | 7,728 | |||||
| Credit impaired provisions | (2,536) | (372) | (1,395) | (96) | (4,399) | |||||
| Net credit impaired | 2,150 | 428 | 635 | 116 | 3,329 | |||||
| Cover ratio | 54% | 47% | 69% | 45% | 57% | |||||
| Collateral (\$million) | 992 | 262 | 307 | 118 | 1,679 | |||||
| Cover ratio (after collateral) | 75% | 79% | 84% | 100% | 79% |
| 01.01.18 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate & Institutional Banking \$million |
Retail Banking \$million |
Commercial Banking \$million |
Private Banking \$million |
Total \$million |
||||
| Gross credit impaired1 | 5,797 | 818 | 1,956 | 207 | 8,778 | |||
| Credit impaired provision | (3,437) | (389) | (1,369) | (91) | (5,286) | |||
| Net credit impaired | 2,360 | 429 | 587 | 116 | 3,492 | |||
| Cover ratio | 59% | 48% | 70% | 44% | 60% | |||
| Collateral (\$million) | 1,111 | 218 | 277 | 203 | 1,809 | |||
| Cover ratio (after collateral) | 78% | 74% | 84% | 100% | 81% |
1 Excludes FVTPL impaired loans
| 31.12.17 (IAS 39) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate & Institutional Banking \$million |
Retail Banking \$million |
Commercial Banking \$million |
Private Banking \$million |
Total \$million |
||||||
| Gross non-performing loans | 5,957 | 489 | 2,026 | 207 | 8,679 | |||||
| Individual impairment provisions1 | (3,468) | (215) | (1,430) | (67) | (5,180) | |||||
| Net non-performing loans | 2,489 | 274 | 596 | 140 | 3,499 | |||||
| Portfolio impairment provision | (157) | (208) | (99) | (2) | (466) | |||||
| Total | 2,332 | 66 | 497 | 138 | 3,033 | |||||
| Cover ratio | 61% | 87% | 75% | 33% | 65% | |||||
| Cover ratio (excluding portfolio impairment provision) | 58% | 44% | 71% | 32% | 60% | |||||
| Collateral (\$ million) | 1,111 | 218 | 277 | 203 | 1,809 | |||||
| Cover ratio (after collateral) | 77% | 89% | 84% | 100% | 81% |
1 The difference to total individual impairment provision refl ects provisions against forborne loans that are not included within non-performing loans as they have been performing for 180 days
Credit-impaired (stage 3) loans by geographic region (unaudited)
Stage 3 loans decreased by \$1.1 billion or 12 per cent compared with January 2018. The largest decrease was in the ASEAN & South Asia region (\$926 million), primarily driven by reductions in the liquidation portfolio through disposal of loans and write-offs.
The following tables present a breakdown of total stage 3 loans to banks and customers by geographic regions:
| 30.06.18 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greater China & North Asia \$million |
ASEAN & South Asia \$million |
Africa & Middle East \$million |
Europe & Americas \$million |
Total \$million |
|
| Gross credit impaired | 821 | 3,322 | 2,715 | 870 | 7,728 |
| Credit impairment provisions | (327) | (2,028) | (1,724) | (320) | (4,399) |
| Net credit impaired | 494 | 1,294 | 991 | 550 | 3,329 |
| Cover ratio | 40% | 61% | 63% | 37% | 57% |
| 01.01.18 | |||||
| Greater China & North Asia \$million |
ASEAN & South Asia \$million |
Africa & Middle East \$million |
Europe & Americas \$million |
Total \$million |
|
| Gross credit impaired | 806 | 4,248 | 2,657 | 1,067 | 8,778 |
| Credit impairment provisions | (308) | (2,500) | (1,846) | (632) | (5,286) |
| Net credit impaired | 498 | 1,748 | 811 | 435 | 3,492 |
| Cover ratio | 38% | 59% | 69% | 59% | 60% |
| 31.12.17 (IAS 39) | |||||
| Greater China & North Asia \$million |
ASEAN & South Asia \$million |
Africa & Middle East \$million |
Europe & Americas \$million |
Total \$million |
|
| Gross non-performing loans | 895 | 3,948 | 2,692 | 1,144 | 8,679 |
| Individual impairment provisions | (396) | (2,389) | (1,675) | (720) | (5,180) |
| Non-performing loans net of individual impairment provision | 499 | 1,559 | 1,017 | 424 | 3,499 |
| Portfolio impairment provisions | (129) | (180) | (121) | (36) | (466) |
| Net non-performing loans and advances | 370 | 1,379 | 896 | 388 | 3,033 |
| Cover ratio | 59% | 65% | 67% | 66% | 65% |
| Cover ratio (excluding portfolio impairment provisions) | 60% |
Movement of credit impaired (stage 3) provisions by client segment
The credit impairment provisions as at 30 June 2018 were lower at \$4,399 million, compared with \$5,286 million as at 1 January 2018, largely due to material reductions in Corporate and Institutional Banking.
The Corporate and Institutional Banking credit impairment provisions as at 30 June 2018 decreased by 26 per cent (\$901 million) compared with 1 January 2018 driven by write offs and lower new provisions taken in the fi rst half 2018.
The following table shows the movement of credit impaired (stage 3) provisions for each client segment:
| 30.06.18 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate & Institutional Banking \$million |
Retail Banking \$million |
Commercial Banking \$million |
Private Banking \$million |
Total1 \$million |
|
| Gross credit impaired loans at 30 June | 4,686 | 800 | 2,030 | 212 | 7,728 |
| Credit impairment provisions at 1 January | 3,437 | 389 | 1,369 | 91 | 5,286 |
| Exchange translation difference | (126) | (11) | (13) | – | (150) |
| Amounts written off | (853) | (266) | (63) | – | (1,182) |
| Recoveries of amounts written off | 49 | 115 | 11 | – | 175 |
| Discount unwind | (7) | (3) | (19) | – | (29) |
| New provisions charge/(release) | 357 | 187 | 194 | 6 | 744 |
| Recoveries/derecognition (repayment) | (374) | (125) | (91) | – | (590) |
| Other movements | – | (3) | – | (1) | (4) |
| Net transfers into and out of stage 3 | 53 | 89 | 7 | – | 149 |
| Credit impairment provisions at 30 June | 2,536 | 372 | 1,395 | 96 | 4,399 |
| Net credit impairment | 2,150 | 428 | 635 | 116 | 3,329 |
| 31.12.17 (IAS 39) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate & Institutional Banking \$million |
Retail Banking \$million |
Commercial Banking \$million |
Private Banking \$million |
Total1 \$million |
|
| Gross impaired loans at 31 December | 5,957 | 695 | 2,027 | 207 | 8,886 |
| Provisions held at 1 January | 3,961 | 262 | 1,602 | 5 | 5,830 |
| Exchange translation differences | 55 | 15 | 31 | 1 | 102 |
| Amounts written off | (1,139) | (577) | (444) | – | (2,160) |
| Releases of acquisition fair values | (1) | – | – | – | (1) |
| Recoveries of amounts previously written off | 27 | 153 | 22 | 32 | 234 |
| Discount unwind | (41) | (23) | (19) | – | (83) |
| Transfer to assets held for sale | – | (6) | – | – | (6) |
| New provisions | 1,197 | 669 | 327 | 63 | 2,256 |
| Recoveries/provisions no longer required | (314) | (218) | (86) | (34) | (652) |
| Net individual impairment charge against profi t | 883 | 451 | 241 | 29 | 1,604 |
| Other movements 2 | (277) | – | (2) | – | (279) |
| Individual impairment provisions held at 31 December | 3,468 | 275 | 1,431 | 67 | 5,241 |
| Net individually impaired loans | 2,489 | 420 | 596 | 140 | 3,645 |
1 Excludes credit impairment relating to loan commitments and fi nancial guarantees
2 Other movements include provisions for liabilities and charges that have been drawn down and are now part of loan impairment
Credit risk mitigation
Potential credit losses from any given account, customer or portfolio are mitigated using a range of tools such as collateral, netting arrangements, credit insurance and credit derivatives, taking into account expected volatility and guarantees.
The reliance that can be placed on these mitigants is carefully assessed in light of issues such as legal certainty and enforceability, market valuation correlation and counterparty risk of the guarantor.
Collateral
The requirement for collateral is not a substitute for the ability to pay, which is the primary consideration for any lending decisions. As a result of reinforcing our collateralisation requirements, the fair value of collateral held as a percentage of amount outstanding has decreased from 46 per cent to 45 per cent in the fi rst half of 2018.
The unadjusted market value of collateral across all asset types, in respect of Corporate & Institutional Banking and Commercial Banking, without adjusting for over-collateralisation, was \$263 billion (2017: \$247 billion).
The collateral values in the table below are adjusted where appropriate in accordance with our risk mitigation policy and for the effect of over-collateralisation. 50 per cent of clients that have placed collateral with the Group are over-collateralised. The average amount of overcollateralisation is 38 per cent.
We have remained prudent in the way we assess the value of collateral, which is calibrated for a severe downturn and backtested against our prior experience. On average, across all types of non-cash collateral, the value ascribed is approximately half of its current market value. Collateral held against Corporate & Institutional Banking and Commercial Banking exposures amounted to \$73 billion.
In the Retail Banking and Private Banking segments, a secured loan is one where the borrower pledges an asset as collateral of which the Group is able to take possession in the event that the borrower defaults. The collateral level for Retail Banking has increased by \$1.7 billion in the fi rst half of 2018.
For loans and advances to customers and banks (including those held at fair value through profi t or loss), the table below sets out the fair value of collateral held by the Group, adjusted where appropriate in accordance with the risk mitigation policy and for the effect of over-collateralisation.
The table below details collateral held against exposures, separately disclosing stage 3 exposure and corresponding collateral.
| 30.06.18 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amount outstanding | Collateral | Net exposure1,2 | |||||||
| Total \$million |
Stage 2 fi nancial assets \$million |
Credit impaired fi nancial assets (Stage 3) \$million |
Total \$million |
Stage 2 fi nancial assets \$million |
Credit impaired fi nancial assets (Stage 3) \$million |
Total \$million |
Stage 2 fi nancial assets \$million |
Credit impaired fi nancial assets (Stage 3) \$million |
|
| Corporate & Institutional Banking |
228,656 | 14,084 | 2,215 | 67,342 | 1,715 | 999 | 161,314 | 12,369 | 1,216 |
| Retail Banking | 101,530 | 2,417 | 428 | 78,194 | 1,279 | 262 | 23,336 | 1,138 | 166 |
| Commercial Banking | 28,571 | 6,161 | 647 | 6,055 | 2,795 | 307 | 22,516 | 3,366 | 340 |
| Private Banking | 13,565 | 421 | 116 | 9,158 | 196 | 118 | 4,407 | 225 | (2) |
| Central and other items | 9,756 | – | – | 9,756 | – | – | – | – | – |
| Total | 382,078 | 23,083 | 3,406 | 170,505 | 5,985 | 1,686 | 211,573 | 17,098 | 1,720 |
| 31.12.17 (IAS 39) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maximum exposure | Collateral | Net expsoure1,2 | ||||||||
| Past due but not individually impaired |
Individually impaired |
Past due but not individually impaired |
Past due but Individually not individually impaired impaired |
Individually impaired |
||||||
| Total \$million |
loans \$million |
loans \$million |
Total \$million |
loans \$million |
loans \$million |
Total \$million |
loans \$million |
loans \$million |
||
| Corporate & Institutional Banking |
193,442 | 1,455 | 5,957 | 70,499 | 160 | 1,111 | 122,943 | 1,295 | 4,846 | |
| Retail Banking | 103,371 | 2,114 | 695 | 76,543 | 1,514 | 218 | 26,828 | 600 | 477 | |
| Commercial Banking | 29,602 | 483 | 2,027 | 6,570 | 247 | 277 | 23,032 | 236 | 1,750 | |
| Private Banking | 13,359 | 85 | 207 | 9,296 | 82 | 203 | 4,063 | 3 | 4 | |
| Central and other items | 27,570 | 2 | – | 5,339 | – | – | 22,231 | 2 | – | |
| Total | 367,344 | 4,139 | 8,886 | 168,247 | 2,003 | 1,809 | 199,097 | 2,136 | 7,077 | |
1 Includes loans held at fair value through profi t or loss
2 Includes loans and advances to banks
Collateral – Corporate & Institutional Banking and Commercial Banking
Collateral held against Corporate & Institutional Banking and Commercial Banking exposures amounted to \$73 billion. The decrease of \$4 billion was primarily in reverse repurchase (repo) collateral due to increased liquidity management activity by the Group. The proportion of investment grade securities in reverse repos collateral remains stable at 97 per cent. The average residual maturity of the reverse repo collateral is 8.1 years.
Collateral taken for longer-term and sub-investment grade corporate loans continues to be high at 55 per cent.
Our underwriting standards encourage taking specifi c charges on assets and we consistently seek high-quality, investment grade collateral. 28 per cent of collateral held comprises physical assets or is property-based, with the remainder largely in cash and investment securities.
Non-tangible collateral such as guarantees and standby letters of credit may also be held against corporate exposures, although the fi nancial effect of this type of collateral is less signifi cant in terms of recoveries. However, this type of collateral is considered when determining probability of default and other credit-related factors. Collateral is also held against off-balance sheet exposures, including undrawn commitments and trade-related instruments.
The following table provides an analysis of the types of collateral held against Corporate & Institutional Banking and Commercial Banking loan exposures.
Corporate & Institutional Banking
| 30.06.18 \$million |
31.12.17 (IAS 39) \$million |
|
|---|---|---|
| Maximum exposure | 228,656 | 193,442 |
| Property | 8,260 | 7,014 |
| Plant, machinery and other stock | 3,152 | 3,612 |
| Cash | 5,531 | 5,742 |
| Reverse repos | 46,092 | 49,736 |
| AAA | 284 | 1,027 |
| A- to AA+ | 39,700 | 40,421 |
| BBB- to BBB+ | 4,693 | 6,448 |
| Lower than BBB- | 558 | 915 |
| Unrated | 857 | 925 |
| Commodities | 228 | 162 |
| Ships and aircraft | 4,079 | 4,233 |
| Total value of collateral | 67,342 | 70,499 |
| Net exposure | 161,314 | 122,943 |
Commercial Banking
| 30.06.18 \$million |
31.12.17 (IAS 39) \$million |
|
|---|---|---|
| Maximum exposure | 28,571 | 29,602 |
| Property | 4,191 | 4,642 |
| Plant, machinery and other stock | 762 | 767 |
| Cash | 901 | 923 |
| Reverse repos | – | – |
| AAA | – | – |
| A- to AA+ | – | – |
| BBB- to BBB+ | – | – |
| Lower than BBB- | – | – |
| Unrated | – | – |
| Commodities | 6 | 4 |
| Ships and aircraft | 195 | 234 |
| Total value of collateral | 6,055 | 6,570 |
| Net exposure | 22,516 | 23,032 |
Collateral – Retail Banking and Private Banking
In Retail Banking and Private Banking, 85 per cent of the portfolio is fully secured. The proportion of unsecured loans remains broadly stable at 14 per cent and remaining 1 per cent is partially secured.
Loan-to-value (LTV) ratios measure the ratio of the current mortgage outstanding to the current fair value of the properties on which they are secured.
In mortgages the value of property held as security signifi cantly exceeds the value of mortgage loans. The average LTV of the overall mortgage portfolio is less than 45 per cent. Hong Kong, which represents 37 per cent of the Retail Banking mortgage portfolio has an average LTV of 35.4 per cent. All of our other key markets continue to have low portfolio LTVs, (Korea, Singapore and Taiwan at 45.6 per cent, 57.1 per cent and 51.2 per cent respectively).
An analysis of LTV ratios by geography for the mortgage portfolio is presented in the mortgage LTV ratios by geography table below.
The following table presents an analysis of loans to individuals by product; split between fully secured, partially secured and unsecured.
| 30.06.18 | 31.12.17 (IAS 39) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fully secured \$million |
Partially secured \$million |
Unsecured \$million |
Total1 \$million |
Fully secured \$million |
Partially secured \$million |
Unsecured \$million |
Total1 \$million |
|
| Maximum exposure | 97,592 | 758 | 16,745 | 115,095 | 97,523 | 1,301 | 17,750 | 116,574 |
| Loans to individuals | ||||||||
| Mortgages | 76,829 | 45 | – | 76,874 | 78,755 | 23 | – | 78,778 |
| CCPL | 243 | 98 | 16,474 | 16,815 | 240 | 86 | 17,209 | 17,535 |
| Auto | 647 | – | – | 647 | 630 | – | 3 | 633 |
| Secured wealth products | 17,164 | 215 | 246 | 17,625 | 13,903 | 156 | 95 | 14,154 |
| Other | 2,709 | 400 | 25 | 3,134 | 3,995 | 1,036 | 443 | 5,474 |
| Total collateral | 87,352 | 85,839 | ||||||
| Net exposure | 27,743 | 30,735 | ||||||
| Percentage of total loans | 85% | 1% | 14% | 84% | 1% | 15% |
1 Amounts net of individual impairment provisions
Mortgage loan-to-value ratios by geography
The following table provides an analysis of loan-to-value ratios by region for the mortgages portfolio:
| 30.06.18 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greater China & North Asia % |
ASEAN & South Asia % |
Africa & Middle East % |
Europe & Americas % |
Total % |
|||
| Less than 50 per cent | 68.5 | 38.8 | 21.2 | 23.1 | 58.4 | ||
| 50 per cent to 59 per cent | 15.0 | 17.9 | 17.2 | 23.5 | 16.0 | ||
| 60 per cent to 69 per cent | 11.4 | 19.3 | 22.7 | 29.8 | 14.2 | ||
| 70 per cent to 79 per cent | 4.2 | 21.6 | 20.6 | 21.3 | 9.6 | ||
| 80 per cent to 89 per cent | 0.7 | 2.0 | 11.0 | 2.3 | 1.4 | ||
| 90 per cent to 99 per cent | 0.1 | 0.2 | 4.1 | – | 0.2 | ||
| 100 per cent and greater | 0.1 | 0.2 | 3.2 | – | 0.2 | ||
| Average portfolio loan-to-value | 41.2 | 53.2 | 64.2 | 53.4 | 44.7 | ||
| Loans to individuals – mortgages (\$million) | 52,754 | 20,005 | 2,237 | 1,878 | 76,874 |
| 31.12.17 (IAS 39) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greater China & North Asia % |
ASEAN & South Asia % |
Africa & Middle East % |
Europe & Americas % |
Total % |
||
| Less than 50 per cent | 62.9 | 36.1 | 21.6 | 28.4 | 54.7 | |
| 50 per cent to 59 per cent | 16.4 | 17.5 | 16.9 | 23.4 | 16.8 | |
| 60 per cent to 69 per cent | 15.3 | 18.7 | 22.6 | 31.4 | 16.6 | |
| 70 per cent to 79 per cent | 4.5 | 22.8 | 20.8 | 13.7 | 9.5 | |
| 80 per cent to 89 per cent | 0.7 | 4.3 | 11.2 | 2.0 | 1.9 | |
| 90 per cent to 99 per cent | 0.1 | 0.3 | 3.9 | 0.4 | 0.3 | |
| 100 per cent and greater | 0.1 | 0.3 | 3.0 | 0.8 | 0.2 | |
| Average portfolio loan-to-value | 43.5 | 55.0 | 63.9 | 52.1 | 46.8 | |
| Loans to individuals – mortgages (\$million) | 54,609 | 20,105 | 2,279 | 1,785 | 78,778 |
Industry and Retail Products analysis by geographic region (unaudited)
This section provides an analysis of the Group's amortised cost loan portfolio, net of provisions, by industry and region.
In the Corporate & Institutional Banking and Commercial Banking segments our largest industry exposures are manufacturing and fi nancing, insurance and non-banking, each constituting 16 per cent of Corporate & Institutional Banking and Commercial Banking loans and advances to customers. Lending to fi nancing, insurance and non-banking clients is mostly to investment grade institutions and is part of the liquidity management of the Group.
The manufacturing industry group is spread across a diverse range of industries, including automobiles and components, capital goods, pharmaceuticals, biotech and life sciences, technology hardware and equipment, chemicals, paper products and packaging, with lending spread over 4,553 clients.
Loans and advances to the energy sector have remained stable and constitute 13 per cent of total loans and advances to Corporate & Institutional Banking and Commercial Banking. The energy sector lending is spread across fi ve subsectors and over 460 clients.
The Group provides loans to commercial real estate counterparties of \$14.9 billion, which represents 6 per cent of total customer loans and advances. In total, \$8.6 billion of this lending is to counterparties where the source of repayment is substantially derived from rental or sale of real estate and is secured by real estate collateral. The remaining commercial real estate loans comprise working capital loans to real estate corporates, loans with non-property collateral, unsecured loans and loans to real estate entities of diversifi ed conglomerates. The average LTV ratio of the commercial real estate portfolio has increased to 44 per cent, compared with 41 per cent in 2017. The proportion of loans with an LTV greater than 80 per cent has remained at 1 per cent during the same period.
Credit cards and personal loans (CCPL) and other unsecured lending of total Retail Products loans and advances remains broadly stable at 14 per cent.
Industry and Retail Products analysis by geographic region
| 30.06.18 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greater China & North Asia \$million |
ASEAN & South Asia \$million |
Africa & Middle East \$million |
Europe & Americas \$million |
Total \$million |
||
| Industry: | ||||||
| Energy | 2,408 | 6,516 | 3,037 | 6,626 | 18,587 | |
| Manufacturing | 11,434 | 5,767 | 3,945 | 2,166 | 23,312 | |
| Financing, insurance and non-banking | 10,423 | 5,189 | 1,188 | 6,412 | 23,212 | |
| Transport, telecom and utilities | 6,813 | 4,056 | 4,773 | 945 | 16,587 | |
| Food and household products | 2,059 | 3,898 | 2,498 | 1,132 | 9,587 | |
| Commercial real estate | 8,084 | 4,923 | 1,780 | 151 | 14,938 | |
| Mining and quarrying | 2,316 | 2,241 | 1,195 | 770 | 6,522 | |
| Consumer durables | 6,060 | 1,810 | 777 | 620 | 9,267 | |
| Construction | 932 | 1,025 | 1,267 | 182 | 3,406 | |
| Trading companies and distributors | 1,158 | 589 | 511 | 58 | 2,316 | |
| Government | 1,419 | 7,910 | 2,077 | 296 | 11,702 | |
| Other | 1,939 | 1,812 | 905 | 657 | 5,313 | |
| Retail Products: | ||||||
| Mortgages | 52,754 | 20,005 | 2,237 | 1,878 | 76,874 | |
| CCPL and other unsecured lending | 9,587 | 4,093 | 2,628 | 1 | 16,309 | |
| Auto | – | 457 | 190 | – | 647 | |
| Secured wealth products | 6,680 | 9,006 | 381 | 1,551 | 17,618 | |
| Other | 2,351 | 109 | 674 | – | 3,134 | |
| Net loans and advances to customers | 126,417 | 79,406 | 30,063 | 23,445 | 259,331 | |
| Net loans and advances to banks | 30,036 | 12,605 | 4,855 | 16,657 | 64,153 |
| 01.01.18 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greater China & North Asia \$million |
ASEAN & South Asia \$million |
Africa & Middle East \$million |
Europe & Americas \$million |
Total \$million |
||
| Industry: | ||||||
| Energy | 2,841 | 5,874 | 3,188 | 6,264 | 18,167 | |
| Manufacturing | 10,885 | 6,290 | 3,145 | 1,883 | 22,203 | |
| Financing, insurance and non-banking | 7,096 | 4,996 | 1,242 | 6,480 | 19,814 | |
| Transport, telecom and utilities | 6,396 | 3,870 | 4,508 | 995 | 15,769 | |
| Food and household products | 2,173 | 4,100 | 2,485 | 1,168 | 9,926 | |
| Commercial real estate | 8,047 | 5,084 | 1,472 | 52 | 14,655 | |
| Mining and quarrying | 1,878 | 2,857 | 1,033 | 580 | 6,348 | |
| Consumer durables | 4,214 | 2,536 | 975 | 691 | 8,416 | |
| Construction | 987 | 1,097 | 1,275 | 238 | 3,597 | |
| Trading companies and distributors | 1,153 | 573 | 426 | 128 | 2,280 | |
| Government | 1,669 | 6,585 | 1,184 | 164 | 9,602 | |
| Other | 1,831 | 1,884 | 1,069 | 579 | 5,363 | |
| Retail Products: | ||||||
| Mortgages | 54,602 | 20,099 | 2,273 | 1,783 | 78,757 | |
| CCPL and other unsecured lending | 9,585 | 3,935 | 2,893 | 2 | 16,415 | |
| Auto | – | 399 | 230 | – | 629 | |
| Secured wealth products | 5,268 | 6,973 | 212 | 1,657 | 14,110 | |
| Other | 2,349 | 2,409 | 696 | 4 | 5,458 | |
| Net loans and advances to customers | 120,974 | 79,561 | 28,306 | 22,668 | 251,509 | |
| Net loans and advances to banks | 30,002 | 12,408 | 4,593 | 15,290 | 62,293 | |
| 31.12.17 (IAS 39) | ||||||
| Greater China & North Asia \$million |
ASEAN & South Asia \$million |
Africa & Middle East \$million |
Europe & Americas \$million |
Total \$million |
||
| Industry: | ||||||
| Energy | 2,855 | 6,097 | 3,303 | 6,289 | 18,544 | |
| Manufacturing | 10,919 | 6,685 | 3,221 | 1,906 | 22,731 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financing, insurance and non-banking | 8,213 | 6,421 | 1,308 | 29,042 | 44,984 |
| Transport, telecom and utilities | 6,456 | 3,965 | 4,707 | 1,036 | 16,164 |
| Food and household products | 2,174 | 4,126 | 2,577 | 1,179 | 10,056 |
| Commercial real estate | 8,429 | 5,169 | 1,479 | 62 | 15,139 |
| Mining and quarrying | 2,079 | 2,903 | 1,089 | 570 | 6,641 |
| Consumer durables | 4,432 | 2,544 | 1,300 | 790 | 9,066 |
| Construction | 989 | 1,118 | 1,358 | 238 | 3,703 |
| Trading companies and distributors | 1,192 | 573 | 432 | 128 | 2,325 |
| Government | 4,864 | 6,728 | 1,430 | 1,398 | 14,420 |
| Other | 1,839 | 2,174 | 1,075 | 583 | 5,671 |
| Retail Products: | |||||
| Mortgages | 54,609 | 20,105 | 2,279 | 1,785 | 78,778 |
| CCPL and other unsecured lending | 10,175 | 4,336 | 3,022 | 2 | 17,535 |
| Auto | – | 399 | 234 | – | 633 |
| Secured wealth products | 5,278 | 7,005 | 213 | 1,658 | 14,154 |
| Other | 2,365 | 2,410 | 696 | 3 | 5,474 |
| 126,868 | 82,758 | 29,723 | 46,669 | 286,018 | |
| Portfolio impairment provision | (129) | (179) | (121) | (36) | (465) |
| Net loans and advances to customers | 126,739 | 82,579 | 29,602 | 46,633 | 285,553 |
| Net loans and advances to banks | 33,226 | 16,523 | 7,428 | 24,148 | 81,325 |
IFRS 9 methodology
Approach for determining expected credit losses
| Defi nition |
|---|
| The probability at a point in time that a counterparty will default, calibrated over up to 12 months from the reporting date (stage 1) or over the lifetime of the product (stage 2) and incorporating the impact of forward-looking economic assumptions that have an effect on credit risk, such as interest rates, unemployment rates and GDP forecasts. |
| The PD is estimated at a point in time that means it will fl uctuate in line with the economic cycle. The term structure of the PD is based on statistical models, calibrated using historical data and adjusted to incorporate forward-looking economic assumptions. |
| The loss that is expected to arise on default, incorporating the impact of forward-looking economic assumptions where relevant, which represents the difference between the contractual cash fl ows due and those that the bank expects to receive. |
| The Group estimates LGD based on the history of recovery rates and considers the recovery of any collateral that is integral to the fi nancial asset, taking into account forward-looking economic assumptions where relevant. |
| The expected balance sheet exposure at the time of default, taking into account the expected change in exposure over the lifetime of the exposure. This incorporates the impact of drawdowns of committed facilities, repayments of principal and interest, amortisation and prepayments, together with the impact of forward-looking economic assumptions where relevant. |
To determine the expected credit loss, these components are multiplied together (PD for the reference period (up to 12 months or lifetime) x LGD at the beginning of the period x EAD at the beginning of the period) and discounted to the balance sheet date using the effective interest rate as the discount rate.
Although the IFRS 9 models leverage the existing Basel advanced IRB risk components, several signifi cant adjustments are required to ensure the resulting outcome is in line with the IFRS 9 requirements.
Key differences between regulatory and IFRS expected credit loss models
| Basel advanced IRB Expected Loss (EL) | IFRS 9 Expected credit loss | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating philosophy | Mix of point-in-time, through-the-cycle or hybrid | Point-in-time, forward looking |
| Parameters calibration | Often conservative, due to regulatory fl oors and downturn calibration |
Unbiased estimate, based on conditions known at the balance sheet date |
| – PD | Inclusion of forward-looking information and removal of conservatism and bias |
|
| – LGD | Removal of regulatory fl oors, exclusion of non-direct costs | |
| – EAD | Floored at outstanding amount | Recognises ability to have a reduction in exposure from the balance sheet date to the default date |
| Time frame | 12-month period | Up to 12 months and lifetime |
| Discounting applied | Discounting at the weighted average cost of capital to the time of default |
Discounting at the effective interest rate (EIR) to the balance sheet reporting date |
Global IFRS 9 expected credit loss models have been developed for the Corporate & Institutional Banking and Commercial Banking businesses. Given the global nature of these portfolios; these models are global in nature at the base level. However, for some of the most material countries, country-specifi c models have been developed for the Corporate & Institutional Banking and Commercial Banking clients.
The calibration of forward-looking information is assessed at a country or region level to take into account local macroeconomic conditions.
Retail banking expected credit loss models are country and product specifi c given the local nature of the Retail Banking business.
For less material Retail Banking loan portfolios, the Group has adopted simplifi ed approaches based on historical roll rates or loss rates:
- ¼ For medium-sized Retail Banking portfolios, a roll rate model is applied, which uses a matrix that gives average loan migration rate from delinquency states from period to period. A matrix multiplication is then performed to generate the fi nal PDs by delinquency bucket over different time horizons
- ¼ For smaller Retail Banking portfolios, loss rate models are applied. These use an adjusted gross charge-off rate, developed using monthly write-off and recoveries over the preceding 12 months and total outstanding balances
Application of lifetime
Expected credit loss is estimated based on the shorter of the expected life and the maximum contractual period for which the Group is exposed to credit risk. For Retail Banking credit cards and Corporate & Institutional Banking overdraft facilities, however the Group does not typically enforce the contractual period. As a result, for these instruments, the lifetime of the exposure is based on the period the Group is exposed to credit risk. This period has been determined by reference to the extent to which credit risk management actions curtail the period of exposure. For credit cards, this has resulted in an average life of between 3 and 10 years across our footprint markets. Overdraft facilities have a 22-month lifetime.
Key assumptions and judgements in determining expected credit loss
Incorporation of forward-looking information and the impact of non-linearity
The evolving economic environment is a key determinant of the ability of a bank's clients to meet their obligations as they fall due. It is a fundamental principle of IFRS 9 that the provisions banks hold against potential future credit risk losses should depend not just on the health of the economy today, but should also take account of changes to the economic environment in the future. For example, if a bank expected a sharp slowdown in the world economy was likely over the coming year, it should hold more provisions today to ensure that it was able to absorb credit losses that would be likely to occur in the near future.
To capture the effect of changes to the economic environment in the future, the computation of probability of default (PD), loss given default (LGD) and so expected credit loss incorporates forwardlooking information; assumptions on the path of economic variables and asset prices that are likely to have an effect on the repayment ability of the Group's clients. For example, economic variables specifi c to individual countries include economic growth, interest rates, unemployment rates, property prices, and prices of assets that trade on global markets such as oil, industrial metals and other commodities. Less sophisticated approaches, such as loss rate models, do not directly incorporate forward-looking information.
The starting point for the projections of economic variables and asset prices is based on management's view, which underlies the plan to deliver the Group's strategy and ensure that has suffi cient capital over the medium term.
Management's view covers a core set of economic variables and asset prices required to set the strategic plan. To reach the full set of economic variables and asset prices required to compute expected credit loss for all the Group's clients in all the Group's footprint markets, management's view is augmented with projections from the Group's in-house research team and outputs from a range of models that project specifi c economic variables and asset prices.
Forecast of key macroeconomic variables underlying the expected credit loss calculation
The base forecast – management's view of the most likely outcome – is that the synchronised expansion of the global economy will continue over the coming years alongside a normalisation of monetary policy in the developed world and the successful rebalancing of the Chinese economy, with US-China trade tensions putting China's export sectors under some pressure.
While the most likely outcome is the basis for the Group's strategic plan, one of the key requirements of IFRS 9 is that the assessment of provisions should be based on a range of potential outcomes for the future economic environment. For example, the global economy may grow more quickly or more slowly than the most likely outcome and this would be expected to have different implications for the provisions that the Group should hold today. As the Group's clients tend to be more affected when the economic environment weakens than when it strengthens, it is possible that the range of expected credit loss outcomes resulting from a range of scenarios around the most likely scenario may be skewed to the downside. So, if the Group computes expected credit loss uniquely on the basis of the most likely outcome, it might not end up with the appropriate level of provisions. This is the concept of non-linearity in expected credit loss under IFRS 9.
To address the potential non-linearity in expected credit loss, the Group simulates a set of scenarios around the base forecast and generates 50 scenarios upon which to compute expected credit loss. These scenarios are generated by a Monte Carlo simulation, which considers the degree of uncertainty (or volatility) around economic outcomes, how these outcomes have generally tended to move together (or correlation), and how the range of reasonably possible outcomes would be defi ned.
While the 50 scenarios do not each have a specifi c narrative, they refl ect a range of plausible hypothetical alternative outcomes for the global economy. Some are better than the base forecast and represent an unwinding of the current shocks and uncertainty leading to higher global economic activity and higher asset prices. Some are worse than the base forecast and represent an intensifi cation of current shocks or introduction of new shocks that raise uncertainty leading to lower global economic activity and lower asset prices.
The table on the next page sets out a representative summary of the economic variables and asset prices that the Group considers to be among the most important determinants of the Group's expected credit loss. The key data provided is the average expected outturn for each economic variable and asset price in the base forecast over the next fi ve years (June 2018 – June 2023) in the most likely scenario and an indicator of the range of each economic variable and asset price over the same period across the multiple scenarios.
| China | Hong Kong | Korea | Singapore | India | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30.06.2018 | Base forecast |
Low2 | High3 | Base forecast |
Low2 | High3 | Base forecast |
Low2 | High3 | Base forecast |
Low2 | High3 | Base forecast |
Low2 | High3 |
| GDP growth (YoY%) |
6.1 | 4.2 | 7.6 | 3.0 | 0.1 | 5.3 | 2.9 | 0.6 | 5.4 | 2.3 | (1.5) | 6.4 | 7.7 | 5.5 | 10.1 |
| Unemployment (%) |
3.9 | 3.8 | 4.1 | 3.5 | 2.4 | 4.6 | 3.3 | 2.6 | 4.1 | 3.0 | 2.3 | 3.8 | N/A1 | N/A1 | N/A1 |
| 3-month interest rates (%) |
4.3 | 3.1 | 5.6 | 2.7 | 1.6 | 3.7 | 2.3 | 1.2 | 3.4 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 3.4 | 6.2 | 4.6 | 7.6 |
| House prices (YoY%) |
5.4 | 3.0 | 8.2 | 1.7 | (9.3) | 11.4 | 3.5 | 1.1 | 6.1 | 4.5 | (1.8) | 10.9 | 8.7 | 1.1 | 14.8 |
| China | Hong Kong | Korea | Singapore | India | |||||||||||
| 01.01.2018 | Base forecast |
Low2 | High3 | Base forecast |
Low2 | High3 | Base forecast |
Low2 | High3 | Base forecast |
Low2 | High3 | Base forecast |
Low2 | High3 |
| GDP growth (YoY%) |
6.1 | 4.5 | 7.6 | 3.0 | 0.3 | 5.4 | 2.9 | 0.8 | 5.6 | 2.3 | (2.0) | 6.1 | 7.5 | 5.4 | 9.7 |
| Unemployment (%) |
4.0 | 3.8 | 4.2 | 3.6 | 2.4 | 4.8 | 3.3 | 2.5 | 4.6 | 2.8 | 2.2 | 3.5 | N/A1 | N/A1 | N/A1 |
| 3-month interest rates (%) |
4.2 | 2.9 | 5.6 | 1.7 | 1.0 | 3.7 | 2.3 | 1.4 | 4.3 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 3.9 | 6.2 | 5.3 | 9.0 |
| House prices (YoY%) |
5.4 | 3.5 | 8.0 | 2.0 | (7.5) | 12.3 | 3.5 | 1.4 | 6.0 | 3.8 | (1.8) | 9.2 | 8.5 | 1.3 | 15.5 |
| Crude Oil Brent, USD pb | |||||||||||||||
| Base forecast |
Low2 | High3 | |||||||||||||
| 30.06.2018 | 76.5 | 38.1 104.8 | |||||||||||||
| Crude Oil Brent, USD pb | |||||||||||||||
| Base forecast |
Low2 | High3 |
1 Not available
2 Represents the 10th percentile in the range used to determine non-linearity
3 Represents the 90th percentile in the range used to determine non-linearity
The fi nal expected credit loss reported by the Group is a simple average of the 50 scenarios. The impact of non-linearity on expected credit loss is set out in the table below:
| Including non-linearity \$m |
Excluding non-linearity \$m |
Difference % |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Total expected credit loss1 | 1,227 | 1,198 | 2.4 |
1 Total modelled expected credit loss comprises stage 1 and stage 2 balances of \$1,075 million and \$152 million of modelled expected credit loss on stage 3 loans
The average expected credit loss under multiple scenarios is 2.4 per cent higher than the expected credit loss computed using only the most likely scenario. Portfolios that are more sensitive to non-linearity include those with a longer tenor, such as Project and Shipping Finance, and credit card portfolios.
Credit-impaired assets managed by Group Special Assets Management (GSAM) incorporate forward-looking economic assumptions in respect of the recovery outcomes identifi ed and are assigned individual probability weightings. These assumptions are not based on a Monte Carlo simulation but are informed by the base case.
Signifi cant increase in credit risk
Quantitative criteria
Signifi cant deterioration is assessed by comparing the risk of default at the reporting date to the risk of default at origination. Whether a change in the risk of default is signifi cant or not is assessed using quantitative and qualitative criteria. These quantitative signifi cant deterioration thresholds have been separately defi ned for each business and where meaningful are consistently applied across business lines.
Assets are considered to have experienced signifi cant credit deterioration if they have breached both relative and absolute thresholds for the change in the average annualised lifetime probability of default over the residual term of the exposure.
The absolute measure of increase in credit risk is used to capture instances where the PDs on exposures are relatively low at initial recognition as these may increase by several multiples without representing a signifi cant increase in credit risk. Where PDs are relatively high at initial recognition, a relative measure is more appropriate in assessing whether there is a signifi cant increase in credit risk, as the PDs increase more quickly.
For Corporate & Institutional Banking and Commercial Banking clients, the relative threshold is a 100 per cent increase in PD and the absolute change in PD is between 50-100 basis points.
For Retail Banking clients, the relative threshold is a 100 per cent increase in PD and the absolute change in PD is between 100-350 basis points depending on the product. Certain counties have a higher absolute threshold refl ecting the lower default rate within this portfolio compared with the Group's other personal loan portfolios.
Private Banking clients are assessed qualitatively, based on a delinquency measure relating collateral top-ups or sell-downs.
Debt securities with an internal credit rating mapped to an investment grade equivalent are allocated to stage 1 and all other debt securities to stage 2.
Qualitative factors that indicate that there has been a signifi cant increase in credit risk include processes linked to current risk management, such as placing loans on non-purely precautionary Early Alert, or through delinquency measures.
The SICR thresholds have been calibrated based on the following principles:
- ¼ Stability The thresholds are set to achieve a stable stage 2 population at a portfolio level, trying to minimise the number of accounts moving back and forth between stage 1 and stage 2 in a short period of time
- ¼ Accuracy The thresholds are set such that there is a materially higher propensity for stage 2 exposures to eventually default than is the case for stage 1 exposures
- ¼ Dependency from backstops The thresholds are stringent enough such that a high proportion of accounts transfer to stage 2 due to movements in forward-looking PD rather than relying on backward-looking backstops such as arrears
- ¼ Relationship with business and product risk profi les The thresholds refl ect the relative risk differences between different products, and are aligned to business processes
Qualitative criteria
Qualitative factors that indicate there has been a signifi cant increase in credit risk include processes linked to current risk management.
Backstop
Across all portfolios, accounts that are 30 or more days past due (DPD) on contractual payments of principal and/or interest that have not been captured by the criteria above are considered to have experienced a signifi cant increase in credit risk.
Expert credit judgement may be applied in assessing signifi cant increase in credit risk to the extent that certain risks may not have been captured by the models or through the above criteria. Such instances are expected to be rare, for example due to events arising close to the reporting date.
Corporate & Institutional Banking and Commercial Banking clients
Quantitative criteria
Exposures are assessed based on both the absolute and the relative movement in the PD from origination to the reporting date as described above.
To account for the fact that the mapping between internal credit grades (used in the origination process) and PDs is non-linear (e.g. a one-notch downgrade in the investment grade universe results in a much smaller PD increase than in the sub-investment grade universe), the absolute thresholds have been differentiated by credit quality at origination, as measured by internal credit grades being investment grade or sub-investment grade.
Qualitative criteria
All assets of clients that have been placed on Early Alert (for nonpurely precautionary reasons) are deemed to have experienced a signifi cant increase in credit risk.
An account is placed on non-purely precautionary Early Alert if it exhibits risk or potential weaknesses of a material nature requiring closer monitoring, supervision or attention by management. Weaknesses in such a borrower's account, if left uncorrected, could result in deterioration of repayment prospects and the likelihood of being downgraded. Indicators could include a rapid erosion of position within the industry, concerns over management's ability to manage operations, weak/deteriorating operating results, liquidity strain and overdue balances among other factors.
All assets of clients that have been assigned a CG12 rating, equivalent to 'Higher Risk', are deemed to have experienced a signifi cant increase in credit risk. Accounts rated CG12 are managed by the GSAM unit. All Corporate & Institutional Banking and Commercial Banking clients are placed on CG12 when they are 30 DPD unless they are granted a waiver through a strict governance process.
Retail Banking clients Quantitative criteria
Material portfolios (defi ned as a combination of country and product, for example Hong Kong mortgages, Taiwan credit cards) for which a statistical model has been built are assessed based on both the absolute and relative movement in the PD from origination to the reporting date as described above. For these portfolios, the original lifetime PD term structure is determined based on the original Application Score or Risk Segment of the client.
Qualitative criteria
Accounts that are 30 DPD that have not been captured by the quantitative criteria are considered to have experienced a signifi cant increase in credit risk. For less material portfolios, which are modelled based on a roll-rate or loss-rate approach, signifi cant increase in credit risk is primarily assessed through the 30 DPD trigger.
Private Banking clients
For Private Banking clients, signifi cant increase in credit risk is assessed by referencing the nature and the level of collateral against which credit is extended (known as 'Classes of Risk').
Qualitative criteria
For all Private Banking Classes, in line with risk management practice, an increase in credit risk is deemed to have occurred where margining or loan-to-value covenants have been breached.
Supplementary information
Prior to submission to CMAC for approval, the models have been validated by Group Model Validation (GMV), a function which is independent of the business and the model developers. GMV's analysis comprises review of model documentation, model design and methodology; data validation; review of model development and calibration process; out-of-sample performance testing; and assessment of compliance review against IFRS 9 rules and internal standards.
Key inputs into the calculation and resulting expected credit loss provisions are subject to review and approval by the IFRS 9 Impairment Committee which is appointed by the Group Risk Committee. The IFRS 9 Impairment Committee consists of senior representatives from Risk, Finance, Treasury and Group Economic Research. It meets twice every quarter, once before the models are run to approve key inputs into the calculation, and once after the models are run to approve the expected credit loss provisions and any judgmental override that may be necessary.
The IFRS 9 Impairment Committee:
- ¼ Oversees the appropriateness of all Business Model Assessment and Solely Payments of Principal and Interest (SPPI) tests
- ¼ Reviews and approves expected credit loss for fi nancial assets classifi ed as stages 1, 2 and 3 for each fi nancial reporting period
- ¼ Reviews and approves stage allocation rules and thresholds
- ¼ Approves material adjustment in relation to expected credit loss for FVOCI and amortised cost fi nancial assets
- ¼ Reviews, challenges and approves base macroeconomic forecasts (including the multiple scenario approach) that are utilised in the forward-looking expected credit loss computation
The IFRS 9 Impairment Committee is supported by an expert panel which reviews and challenges the full extended version of base case projections and multiple macroeconomic scenarios. The Expert Panel consists of members of Enterprise Risk Management (which includes the Scenario Design team), Finance, Group Economic Research and country representatives of major jurisdictions.
For Class I and Class III assets, a signifi cant increase in credit risk is assumed to have occurred where the bank is unable to 'sell down' the applicable assets to meet revised collateral requirements within 5 days of a trigger.
Class II assets are typically unsecured or partially secured, or secured against illiquid collateral such as shares in private companies. Signifi cant credit deterioration of these assets is deemed to have occurred when any Early Alert trigger has been breached.
Debt Securities
to have occurred.
Quantitative criteria
The bank is utilising the low credit risk simplifi ed approach. All debt securities with an internal credit rating mapped to an investment grade equivalent are allocated to stage 1 and all other debt securities are allocated to stage 2.
Qualitative criteria
Debt securities utilise the same qualitative criteria as the Corporate & Institutional Banking and Commercial Banking client segments, including being placed on Early Alert or being classifi ed as credit grade 12.
Assessment of credit impaired fi nancial assets
Retail Banking clients
The core components in determining credit-impaired expected credit loss provisions are the value of gross charge off and recoveries. Gross charge off and/or loss provisions are recognised when it is established that the account is unlikely to pay through the normal process. Recovery of unsecured debt post credit-impairment is recognised based on actual cash collected, either directly from clients or through the sale of defaulted loans to third-party institutions. Release of credit-impairment provisions for secured loans is recognised if the loan outstanding is paid in full (release of full provision), or the provision is higher than the loan outstanding (release of the excess provision. If the loan is paid to current and remains in current for more than 180 days (1 year for forborne loans) the account will be transferred to stage 2.
Corporate & Institutional Banking, Commercial Banking and Private Banking Clients
Credit-impaired accounts are managed by the Group's specialist recovery unit, Group Special Assets Management (GSAM) which is independent from its main businesses. Where any amount is considered irrecoverable, a stage 3 credit-impairment provision is raised. This stage 3 provision is the difference between the loancarrying amount and the probability weighted present value of estimated future cash fl ows, refl ecting a range of scenarios (typically the best, worst and most likely recovery outcomes). Where the cash fl ows include realisable collateral, the values used will incorporate the impact of forward looking economic information.
The individual circumstances of each client are considered when GSAM estimates future cash fl ows and timing of future recoveries which involve signifi cant judgement. All available sources, such as cash fl ow arising from operations, selling assets or subsidiaries, realising collateral or payments under guarantees, are considered. In any decision relating to the raising of provisions, the Group attempts to balance economic conditions, local knowledge and experience, and the results of independent asset reviews.
Write-offs
Where it is considered that there is no realistic prospect of recovering a portion of an exposure against which an impairment provision has been raised, that amount will be written off.
Governance and application of expert credit judgement in respect of expected credit losses
The models used in determining expected credit losses are reviewed and approved by the Group Credit Model Assessment Committee (CMAC) which is appointed by the Stress Testing Committee. CMAC has the responsibility to assess and approve the use of models and to review and approve all IFRS 9 interpretations related to models. CMAC also provides oversight on operational matters related to model development, performance monitoring and model validation activities including standards, regulatory and Group Internal Audit matters.
Country risk (unaudited)
Country risk is defi ned as the potential for default or losses due to political or economic events in a country. A key component of Country risk is country cross-border risk, which is the risk that the Group will be unable to obtain payment from counterparties on their contractual obligations as a result of actions taken by foreign governments, chiefl y relating to convertibility and transferability of foreign currency.
The profi le of the Group's country cross-border exposures as at 30 June 2018 remained consistent with its strategic focus on core franchise countries, and with the scale of the larger markets in which it operates.
Country cross-border exposure to China remains predominantly short-term (88 per cent of exposure had a tenor of less than one year). During the fi rst half of 2018, the Group's cross-border exposure to China decreased, with approximately half of the reduction attributed to a reduction in trade fi nance activities.
Country cross-border risk exposure to Hong Kong increased during the fi rst half of 2018. Factors contributing to the increase included a rise in medium-term corporate loans and growth in interbank placements.
Singapore's cross-border exposure reduced during the fi rst half of 2018 due to a reduction in outstandings to fi nancial institutions and maturing short-term trade fi nance facilities.
The decrease in cross-border exposure to South Korea refl ects a reduction in marketable securities held during the fi rst half of 2018. South Korea's export-driven economy has been affected by external conditions, such as increased trade tensions between the US and China and tightening US monetary policy.
The overall size of cross-border exposure to India refl ects the size of the Group's franchise in the country, as well as the role the Group plays in providing support in overseas investment and trade fl ows that are supported by parent companies in India. The decrease in cross-border exposure to India in the fi rst half of 2018 is driven by paydown across some of the Group's key clients, lower utilisation across trade limits, and successful closure of syndications which resulted in exposure being brought down to agreed hold levels.
The lower United Arab Emirates cross-border exposures in the fi rst half of 2018 is a result of a reduction in trade and lending activity which has evolved in line with the economic slowdown and downturn in business sentiment.
The increase in Saudi Arabia's cross-border exposure in the fi rst half of 2018 refl ects rising sovereign and sovereign-related entity exposures.
Cross-border exposure to developed countries in which the Group does not have a major presence, predominantly relates to treasury and liquidity management activities, which can change signifi cantly from period to period. Exposure to such markets also represents global corporate business for clients with interests in our footprint.
The table below, which is based on the Group's internal country cross-border risk reporting requirements, shows cross-border exposures that exceed 1 per cent of total Group assets.
| 30.06.18 | 31.12.17 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Less than one year \$million |
More than one year \$million |
Total \$million |
Less than one year \$million |
More than one year \$million |
Total \$million |
||
| China1 | 37,472 | 4,998 | 42,470 | 38,677 | 6,204 | 44,881 | |
| Hong Kong1 | 13,860 | 7,637 | 21,497 | 11,685 | 7,964 | 19,649 | |
| United States | 9,807 | 9,153 | 18,960 | 10,068 | 9,524 | 19,592 | |
| Singapore | 12,410 | 4,875 | 17,285 | 13,555 | 5,955 | 19,510 | |
| South Korea | 12,847 | 4,347 | 17,194 | 14,513 | 4,331 | 18,844 | |
| India | 10,512 | 5,568 | 16,080 | 11,687 | 5,819 | 17,506 | |
| United Arab Emirates | 7,817 | 7,607 | 15,424 | 7,932 | 8,341 | 16,273 | |
| Germany | 3,065 | 5,960 | 9,025 | 3,022 | 4,505 | 7,527 | |
| Saudi Arabia | 2,689 | 4,956 | 7,645 | 1,820 | 2,967 | 4,787 | |
| Australia | 2,988 | 4,299 | 7,287 | 1,916 | 4,045 | 5,961 |
1 Cross-border exposures for 31.12.17 (IAS 39) relating to China and Hong Kong have been restated to refl ect methodology amendments:
China – Less than 1 year bucket restated from \$40,351 million to \$38,677 million. Consequently the Total is restated from \$46,455 million to \$44,881 million.
Hong Kong – More than 1 year bucket restated from \$7,867 million to \$7,964 million. Consequently the Total is restated from \$19,552 million to \$19,649 million.
Market risk
Highlights
Daily VaR – trading and non-trading
Market risk is the potential for loss of economic value due to adverse changes in fi nancial market rates or prices. The Group's exposure to market risk arises predominantly from these sources:
¼ Trading book: the Group provides clients access to fi nancial markets, facilitation of which entails the Group taking moderate market risk positions. All trading teams support client activity; there are no proprietary trading teams. Hence, income earned from market risk-related activities is primarily driven by the volume of client activity rather than risk-taking
¼ Non-trading book:
– The Treasury Markets desk is required to hold a liquid assets buffer, much of which is held in high-quality marketable debt securities
- The Group has capital invested and related income streams denominated in currencies other than US dollars. To the extent that these are not hedged, the Group is subject to structural foreign exchange risk which is refl ected in reserves
- The primary categories of market risk for the Group are:
- ¼ Interest rate risk: arising from changes in yield curves, credit spreads and implied volatilities on interest rate options
- ¼ Foreign exchange rate risk: arising from changes in currency exchange rates and implied volatilities on foreign exchange options
- ¼ Commodity risk: arising from changes in commodity prices and implied volatilities on commodity options covering energy, precious metals, base metals and agriculture
- ¼ Equity risk: arising from changes in the prices of equities, equity indices, equity baskets and implied volatilities on related options
- ¼ Credit spread risk: arising from changes in the credit spread of the Group's derivative counterparties through CVA accounting
Market risk changes
The average level of total trading and non-trading VaR in the fi rst half of 2018 was 22 per cent lower than in the fi rst half of 2017 and 19 per cent lower than in the second half of 2017. The actual level of total trading and non-trading VaR at the end of the fi rst half of 2018 was lower than at the end of the fi rst half of 2017 by 23 per cent and lower than at the end of the second half of 2017 by 12 per cent. The reduction in VaR over the periods is primarily driven by the non-trading business reducing the duration of its portfolio.
For the trading book, the average level of VaR in the fi rst half of 2018 was lower than in the fi rst half of 2017 by 22 per cent and lower than in the second half of 2017 by 11 per cent. Trading activities have remained relatively unchanged and client-driven. The marginal reduction is primarily due to a decrease in the Group's bond inventory.
Daily value at risk (VaR at 97.5%, one day)
| 6 months ended 30.06.18 | 6 months ended 31.12.17 | 6 months ended 30.06.17 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trading and non-trading | Average \$million |
High1 \$million |
Low1 \$million |
Actual2 \$million |
Average \$million |
High1 \$million |
Low1 \$million |
Actual2 \$million |
Average \$million |
High1 \$million |
Low1 \$million |
Actual2 \$million |
| Interest rate risk3 | 19.1 | 22.8 | 16.9 | 17.7 | 22.1 | 25.5 | 18.1 | 18.7 | 23.0 | 28.5 | 19.7 | 23.4 |
| Foreign exchange risk | 4.9 | 8.6 | 3.1 | 3.9 | 5.5 | 12.3 | 3.0 | 6.0 | 5.5 | 11.0 | 3.2 | 4.7 |
| Commodity risk | 1.2 | 1.8 | 0.9 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 2.0 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 1.0 |
| Equity risk | 6.2 | 6.8 | 4.1 | 4.7 | 7.7 | 8.1 | 6.4 | 6.7 | 7.7 | 8.4 | 7.2 | 7.6 |
| Total4 | 20.4 | 24.4 | 17.5 | 19.6 | 25.1 | 29.3 | 20.3 | 22.3 | 26.3 | 32.4 | 23.5 | 25.6 |
| 6 months ended 30.06.18 | 6 months ended 31.12.17 | 6 months ended 30.06.176 | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trading5 | Average \$million |
High1 \$million |
Low1 \$million |
Actual2 \$million |
Average \$million |
High1 \$million |
Low1 \$million |
Actual2 \$million |
Average \$million |
High1 \$million |
Low1 \$million |
Actual2 \$million |
|
| Interest rate risk3 | 8.6 | 11.7 | 6.4 | 6.8 | 9.8 | 13.1 | 7.7 | 8.5 | 10.5 | 12.9 | 8.8 | 9.9 | |
| Foreign exchange risk | 4.9 | 8.6 | 3.1 | 3.9 | 5.5 | 12.3 | 3.0 | 6.0 | 5.5 | 11.0 | 3.2 | 4.7 | |
| Commodity risk | 1.2 | 1.8 | 0.9 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 2.0 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 1.0 | |
| Equity risk | 0.1 | 0.1 | – | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | |
| Total4 | 10.4 | 13.8 | 7.5 | 8.1 | 11.7 | 15.5 | 9.4 | 12.1 | 13.3 | 17.2 | 11.0 | 12.1 | |
| 6 months ended 30.06.18 | 6 months ended 31.12.17 | 6 months ended 30.06.17 |
| Non-trading | Average \$million |
High1 \$million |
Low1 \$million |
Actual2 \$million |
Average \$million |
High1 \$million |
Low1 \$million |
Actual2 \$million |
Average \$million |
High1 \$million |
Low1 \$million |
Actual2 \$million |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interest rate risk3 | 15.8 | 17.7 | 14.1 | 15.1 | 19.3 | 23.1 | 14.4 | 14.4 | 19.7 | 22.8 | 17.7 | 21.9 |
| Equity risk | 6.2 | 6.8 | 4.1 | 4.6 | 7.6 | 8.0 | 6.2 | 6.6 | 7.6 | 8.1 | 7.2 | 7.5 |
| Total4 | 16.6 | 18.8 | 15.3 | 16.0 | 20.9 | 23.8 | 16.3 | 16.3 | 22.4 | 27.6 | 19.6 | 21.6 |
1 Highest and lowest VaR for each risk factor are independent and usually occur on different days
2 Actual one day VaR at period end date
3 Interest rate risk VaR includes credit spread risk arising from securities accounted as fair value through profi t or loss ('FVPL') or as fair value through other comprehensive income ('FVOCI')
4 The total VaR shown in the tables above is not a sum of the component risks due to offsets between them
5 Trading book for market risk is defi ned in accordance with the EU Capital Requirements Regulation (CRDIV/CRR) Part 3 Title I Chapter 3 which restricts the positions permitted in the trading book
6 The total trading VaR for 6 months ended 30.06.2017 has been restated from (Average: 12.6, High: 15.7, Low: 9.8, Actual: 11.7) to refl ect the impact of XVA
Risks not in VaR (unaudited)
In the fi rst half of 2018, the main market risk not refl ected in VaR was the currency risk where the exchange rate is currently pegged or managed. The historical one-year VaR observation period does not refl ect the future possibility of a change in the currency regime such as sudden de-pegging. The other material market risk not refl ected in VaR was associated with basis risks where historical market price data for VaR is sometimes more limited, and therefore proxied, generating a potential basis risk. Additional capital is set aside to cover such 'risks not in VaR'. For further details on market risk capital see the market risk section of the Standard Chartered PLC Pillar 3 Disclosures for 30 June 2018.
Backtesting (unaudited)
Regulatory backtesting is applied at both Group and Solo levels. In the 12 months to 30 June 2018, there has been one negative exception at Group level.
This exception occurred on 18 December 2017 due to yield curve moves in Nigeria. The Central Bank of Nigeria restarted its liquidity management open market operations unexpectedly, fi lling Nigerian treasury bill auctions below the lowest bid yields. This move caused the market to sell off and Nigerian Naira yields to rise sharply. One exception in a year due to market events is within the 'green zone' applied internationally to internal models by bank supervisors (Basel Committee on Banking Supervision: 'Supervisory framework for the use of backtesting in conjunction with the internal models approach to market risk capital requirements', January 1996).
The graph below illustrates the performance of the VaR model used in capital calculations. It compares the 99 percentile loss confi dence level given by the VaR model with the Hypothetical profi t & loss (P&L) of each day given the actual market movement without taking into account any intra-day trading activity.
Half year 2018 Backtesting chart Internal model approach regulatory trading book at Group level
Hypothetical profit and loss (P&L) versus VaR (99 per cent, one day)
| Average daily income earned from market risk related activities1 | 6 months ended 3 0.06.18 \$million |
6 months ended 31.12.17 \$million |
6 months ended 30.06.17 \$million |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trading | |||
| Interest rate risk | 4.3 | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| Foreign exchange risk | 3.8 | 3.7 | 3.7 |
| Commodity risk | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Equity risk | – | – | – |
| Total | 8.9 | 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Non-trading | |||
| Interest rate risk | 2.9 | 1.7 | 3.1 |
| Equity risk | (0.3) | 0.6 | – |
| Total | 2.6 | 2.3 | 3.1 |
1 Refl ects total product income which is the sum of client income and own account income. Includes elements of trading income, interest income and other income which are generated from market risk related activities. XVA income is included under interest rate risk
Liquidity and funding risk
Liquidity and funding risk is the potential that the Group does not have suffi cient fi nancial resources or stable sources of funding in the medium or long term, to meet its obligations as they fall due, or can access these fi nancial resources only at excessive cost.
The Group's liquidity and funding risk framework requires each country to ensure that it operates within predefi ned liquidity limits and remain in compliance with Group liquidity policies and practices, as well as local regulatory requirements.
The Group achieves this through a combination of setting risk appetite and associated limits, policy formation, risk measurement and monitoring, prudential and internal stress testing, governance and review.
For further information on the Group's liquidity and funding risk framework, refer to the Risk Management Approach in the 2017 Annual Report.
Liquidity and funding risk metrics
The Group monitors key liquidity metrics regularly, both on a country basis and in aggregate across the Group.
The following liquidity and funding board risk appetite metrics defi ne the maximum amount and type of risk that the Group is willing to assume in pursuit of its strategy: liquidity coverage ratio (LCR), liquidity stress survival horizons, external wholesale borrowing and advancesto-deposits ratio.
Liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) (unaudited)
The LCR is a regulatory requirement set to ensure that the Group has suffi cient unencumbered high quality liquid assets to meet its liquidity needs in a 30-calendar-day liquidity stress scenario.
The Group monitors and reports its liquidity position under European Commission Delegated Regulation 2015/61 and has maintained its liquidity position above the prudential requirement.
At the reporting date, the Group LCR was 151 per cent (2017: 146 per cent) with a prudent surplus to both Board-approved risk appetite and regulatory requirements. The ratio increased 5 per cent in the fi rst half of 2018 largely due to an increase in the overall size of our liquidity buffer as we focused on growing the quality of our funding base.
Liquidity coverage ratio
| 30.06.18 \$million |
31.12.17 \$million |
|
|---|---|---|
| Liquidity buffer | 147,575 | 132,251 |
| Total net cash outfl ows | 97,886 | 90,691 |
| Liquidity coverage ratio | 151% | 146% |
Stressed coverage (unaudited)
The Group intends to maintain a prudent and sustainable funding and liquidity position, in all presence countries and currencies, such that it can withstand a severe but plausible liquidity stress.
The Group's internal liquidity stress testing framework covers the following stress scenarios:
Standard Chartered-specifi c – This scenario captures the liquidity impact from an idiosyncratic event affecting Standard Chartered only, i.e. the rest of the market is assumed to operate normally.
Market-wide – This scenario captures the liquidity impact from a market-wide crisis affecting all participants in a country, region or globally.
Combined – This scenario assumes both Standard Charteredspecifi c and market-wide events affecting the Group simultaneously and hence is the most severe scenario.
All scenarios include, but are not limited to, modelled outfl ows for retail and wholesale funding, off-balance sheet funding risk, cross currency funding risk, intraday risk, franchise risk and risks associated with a deterioration of a fi rm's credit rating.
Stress testing results show that a positive surplus was maintained under all scenarios at 30 June 2018 i.e. the respective countries included were able to survive for a period of time as defi ned under each scenario. The combined scenario at 30 June 2018 showed the Group maintaining liquidity resources to survive greater than 60 days, as per its risk appetite. The results take into account currency convertibility and portability constraints across all major presence countries.
External wholesale borrowing
The Board sets a risk limit to prevent excessive reliance on wholesale borrowing. Limits are applied to all branches and operating subsidiaries in the Group and as at the reporting date the Group remained within the Board-approved risk appetite.
Advances-to-deposits ratio
This is defi ned as the ratio of total loans and advances to customers relative to total customer accounts. An advances-to-deposits ratio of below 100 per cent demonstrates that customer deposits exceed customer loans as a result of the emphasis placed on generating a high level of funding from customers.
The advances-to-deposits ratio decreased to 68.2 per cent over the fi rst half of 2018 (2017: 69.4 per cent).
Loans and advances to customers have increased 4 per cent since the end of 2017 to \$297 billion. This growth was largely due to higher Corporate Finance balances in Hong Kong, an increase in Transaction Banking overdrafts and growth in the Group's repo business as it continued to benefi t from its deep client franchise and balance sheet strength. This increase was partly offset by a reduction in retail lending primarily due to unfavourable foreign exchange movements in Singapore, Korea and India.
Customer accounts have also increased 6 per cent from the end of 2017 to \$435 billion. The Group has focused on high quality liquidity with an emphasis on time deposits given their high liquidity and regulatory value. The Group's secured borrowing also grew signifi cantly over the period. This increase was partially offset by a reduction in Transaction Banking current and savings account balances.
Advances-to-deposits ratio
| 30.06.18 \$million |
31.12.17 \$million |
|
|---|---|---|
| Loans and advances to customers1,2 | 296,719 | 285,553 |
| Customer accounts3 | 435,014 | 411,724 |
| Advances-to-deposits ratio | 68.2% | 69.4% |
1 See note 12 of the fi nancial statements
2 Includes reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending of \$37,909 million
3 Includes repurchase agreements and other similar secured borrowing of \$46,675 million
Net stable funding ratio (NSFR) (unaudited)
On 23 November 2016 the European Commission, as part of a package of risk-reducing measures, proposed a binding requirement for stable funding (Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR)) at European Union level. The proposal aims to implement the European Banking Authority's interpretation of the Basel standard on NSFR (BCBS295).
Pending implementation of the fi nal rules, the Group continues to monitor NSFR in line with BCBS295. At the last reporting date, the Group NSFR remained above 100 per cent.
Liquidity pool (unaudited)
The liquidity value of the Group's LCR eligible liquidity pool at the reporting date was \$148 billion. The fi gures in the below table account for haircuts, currency convertibility and portability constraints, and therefore are not directly comparable with the consolidated balance sheet. The pool is held to offset stress outfl ows as defi ned in European Commission Delegated Regulation 2015/61 covering both Pillar 1 and Pillar 2 risks along with internal Board approved risk appetitie.
LCR eligible securities, as defi ned under LCR Delegated Act rules, fall into three categories: Level 1, Level 2A, and Level 2B liquid assets. Level 1 liquid assets, which are of the highest quality and deemed the most liquid, are subject to no or little discount (or haircuts) to their market value and may be largely used without limit in the liquidity buffer, with the exception of Level 1 covered bonds.
Level 2A and 2B securities are recognised as being relatively stable and reliable sources of liquidity, but not to the same extent as Level 1 assets. LCR rules therefore set a 40 per cent composition cap on the combined amount of Level 2A and Level 2B that fi rms may hold in their total eligible liquidity buffer. Level 2B liquid assets, which are considered less liquid and more volatile than Level 2A liquid assets, are subject to large and varying haircuts and may not exceed 15 per cent of the total eligible HQLA.
The pool increased \$15 billion in the fi rst half of 2018, refl ecting overall balance sheet growth with surplus liquidity deployed primarily in Level 1 and Level 2A securities held in Europe & Americas and Greater China & North Asia. The majority of the Group's liquidity pool is held in Level 1 assets (92 per cent) in the form of unencumbered central bank reserves and high quality Level 1 securities. The remainder is made up of Level 2A (7 per cent) and Level 2B (1 per cent) securities.
| 30.06.18 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greater China & North Asia \$million |
ASEAN & South Asia \$million |
Africa & Middle East \$million |
Europe & Americas \$million |
Total \$million |
|||||
| 12,679 | 2,318 | 1,376 | 33,580 | 49,953 | |||||
| 32,370 | 10,775 | 991 | 29,266 | 73,402 | |||||
| 2,359 | 676 | 184 | 7,288 | 10,507 | |||||
| – | – | – | 1,745 | 1,745 | |||||
| 47,408 | 13,769 | 2,551 | 71,879 | 135,607 | |||||
| 2,592 | 1,051 | 105 | 6,043 | 9,791 | |||||
| – | 383 | – | 1,794 | 2,177 | |||||
| 50,000 | 15,203 | 2,656 | 79,716 | 147,575 | |||||
| Greater China & North Asia \$million |
ASEAN & South Asia \$million |
Africa & Middle East \$million |
Europe & Americas \$million |
Total \$million |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13,779 | 2,400 | 1,708 | 33,191 | 51,078 | ||||
| 28,187 | 12,265 | 1,064 | 24,464 | 65,980 | ||||
| – | 563 | 159 | 8,568 | 9,290 | ||||
| – | – | – | 130 | 130 | ||||
| 41,966 | 15,228 | 2,931 | 66,353 | 126,478 | ||||
| 2,234 | 825 | 113 | 1,147 | 4,319 | ||||
| – | 246 | 3 | 1,206 | 1,455 | ||||
| 44,200 | 16,299 | 3,047 | 68,706 | 132,252 | ||||
| 31.12.17 |
Encumbrance (unaudited)
Encumbered assets
Encumbered assets represent on-balance sheet assets pledged or subject to any form of arrangement to secure, collateralise or credit enhance a transaction from which it cannot be freely withdrawn. Cash collateral pledged against derivatives and Hong Kong government certifi cates of indebtedness, which secure the equivalent amount of Hong Kong currency notes in circulation, are included within Other assets.
Unencumbered – readily available for encumbrance
Unencumbered assets that are considered by the Group to be readily available in the normal course of business to secure funding, meet collateral needs, or be sold to reduce potential future funding requirements, are not subject to any restrictions on their use for these purposes.
Unencumbered – other assets capable of being encumbered
Unencumbered assets that, in their current form, are not considered by the Group to be readily realisable in the normal course of business to secure funding, meet collateral needs, or be sold to reduce potential future funding requirements, are not subject to any restrictions on their use for these purposes. Included within this category are loans and advances which would be suitable for use in secured funding structures such as securitisations.
Unencumbered – cannot be encumbered
Unencumbered assets that have not been pledged and the Group has assessed cannot be used to secure funding, meet collateral needs, or be sold to reduce potential future funding requirements.
Derivatives, reverse repurchase agreements and stock lending
These assets are shown separately as these on-balance sheet amounts cannot be pledged. However, these assets can give rise to off-balance sheet collateral which can be used to raise secured funding or meet additional funding requirements.
30.06.18
The following table provides a reconciliation of the Group's encumbered assets to total assets.
| Assets encumbered as a result of transactions with counterparties |
other than central banks | Other assets (comprising assets encumbered at the central bank and unencumbered assets) |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assets | Assets not positioned at the central bank | |||||||||
| Assets \$million |
As a result of securitisations \$million |
Other \$million |
Total \$million |
positioned at the central bank (ie pre-positioned plus encumbered) \$million |
Readily available for encumbrance \$million |
Other assets that are capable of being encumbered \$million |
Derivatives and reverse repo/stock lending \$million |
Cannot be encumbered \$million |
Total \$million |
|
| Cash and balances at central banks |
58,213 | – | – | – | 9,495 | 48,718 | – | – | – | 58,213 |
| Derivative fi nancial instruments |
51,780 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 51,780 | – | 51,780 |
| Loans and advances to banks1 |
85,359 | – | – | – | – | 42,583 | 7,407 | 26,512 | 8,857 | 85,359 |
| Loans and advances to customers1 |
296,719 | 9 | – | 9 | – | – | 238,597 | 37,909 | 20,204 | 296,710 |
| Investment securities1 | 144,356 | – | 14,148 | 14,148 | 291 | 86,791 | 32,558 | – | 10,568 130,208 | |
| Other assets | 39,068 | – | 15,706 | 15,706 | – | – | 13,019 | – | 10,343 | 23,362 |
| Current tax assets | 366 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 366 | 366 |
| Prepayments and accrued income |
2,418 | – | – | – | – | – | 1,252 | – | 1,166 | 2,418 |
| Interests in associates and joint ventures |
2,345 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 2,345 | 2,345 |
| Goodwill and intangible assets |
4,974 | – | – | – | – | – | 35 | – | 4,939 | 4,974 |
| Property, plant and equipment |
7,326 | – | – | – | – | – | 882 | – | 6,444 | 7,326 |
| Deferred tax assets | 1,290 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1,290 | 1,290 |
| Assets classifi ed as held for sale |
660 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 660 | 660 |
| Total | 694,874 | 9 | 29,854 | 29,863 | 9,786 | 178,092 | 293,750 | 116,201 | 67,182 | 665,011 |
1 Includes assets held at fair value through profi t or loss and reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending
| 31.12.17(IAS 39) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assets encumbered as a result of transactions with counterparties other |
than central banks | Other assets (comprising assets encumbered at the central bank and unencumbered assets) |
||||||||||
| Assets | Assets not positioned at the central bank | |||||||||||
| Assets \$million |
As a result of securitisations \$million |
Other \$million |
Total \$million |
positioned at the central bank (ie pre-positioned plus encumbered) \$million |
Readily available for encumbrance \$million |
Other assets that are capable of being encumbered \$million |
Derivatives and reverse repo/stock lending \$million |
Cannot be encumbered \$million |
Total \$million |
|||
| Cash and balances at central banks |
58,864 | – | – | – | 9,761 | 49,103 | – | – | – | 58,864 | ||
| Derivative fi nancial instruments |
47,031 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 47,031 | – | 47,031 | ||
| Loans and advances to banks1 |
81,325 | – | – | – | – | 47,380 | 5,333 | 21,260 | 7,352 | 81,325 | ||
| Loans and advances to customers1 |
285,553 | 11 | – | 11 | – | – | 232,328 | 33,928 | 19,286 | 285,542 | ||
| Investment securities1 | 138,187 | – | 8,213 | 8,213 | 178 | 91,928 | 29,967 | – | 7,901 | 129,974 | ||
| Other assets | 33,490 | – | 14,930 | 14,930 | – | – | 11,604 | – | 6,956 | 18,560 | ||
| Current tax assets | 491 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 491 | 491 | ||
| Prepayments and accrued income |
2,307 | – | – | – | – | – | 1,503 | – | 804 | 2,307 | ||
| Interests in associates and joint ventures |
2,307 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 2,307 | 2,307 | ||
| Goodwill and intangible assets |
5,013 | – | – | – | – | – | 352 | – | 4,661 | 5,013 | ||
| Property, plant and equipment |
7,211 | – | – | – | – | – | 1,148 | – | 6,063 | 7,211 | ||
| Deferred tax assets | 1,177 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1,177 | 1,177 | ||
| Assets classifi ed as held for sale |
545 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 545 | 545 | ||
| Total | 663,501 | 11 | 23,143 | 23,154 | 9,939 | 188,411 | 282,235 | 102,219 | 57,543 | 640,347 |
1 Includes assets held at fair value through profi t or loss and reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending
The Group received \$81,367 million (2017: \$72,982 million) as collateral under reverse repurchase agreements that was eligible for repledging; of this the Group sold or repledged \$42,028 million (2017: \$34,018 million) under repurchase agreements.
Liquidity analysis of the Group's balance sheet
Contractual maturity of assets and liabilities
The following table presents assets and liabilities by maturity groupings based on the remaining period to the contractual maturity date as at the balance sheet date on a discounted basis. Contractual maturities do not necessarily refl ect actual repayments or cashfl ow.
Within the tables below, cash and balances with central banks, interbank placements and investment securities that are available-for-sale are used by the Group principally for liquidity management purposes.
As at the reporting date, assets remain predominantly short-dated, with 61 per cent maturing in under one year. The Group's less-than-threemonth cumulative net funding gap increased from the previous period, largely due to an increase in customer accounts as the Group focused on improving the quality of its deposit base. In practice, these deposits are recognised as stable and have behavioural profi les that extend beyond their contractual maturities.
| 30.06.18 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| One month or less \$million |
Between one month and three months \$million |
Between three months and six months \$million |
Between six months and nine months \$million |
Between nine months and one year \$million |
Between one year and two years \$million |
Between two years and fi ve years \$million |
More than fi ve years and undated \$million |
Total \$million |
||||
| Assets | ||||||||||||
| Cash and balances at central banks |
48,718 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 9,495 | 58,213 | |||
| Derivative fi nancial instruments | 8,465 | 8,125 | 5,249 | 4,554 | 3,334 | 5,093 | 8,151 | 8,809 | 51,780 | |||
| Loans and advances to banks1,2 | 39,890 | 22,424 | 10,618 | 4,590 | 4,260 | 1,766 | 1,457 | 354 | 85,359 | |||
| Loans and advances to customers1,2 |
79,015 | 39,057 | 15,878 | 8,659 | 10,678 | 19,551 | 37,237 | 86,644 | 296,719 | |||
| Investment securities | 12,011 | 19,976 | 16,101 | 12,663 | 12,848 | 24,297 | 30,132 | 16,328 | 144,356 | |||
| Other assets | 25,946 | 5,454 | 2,347 | 88 | 329 | 40 | 140 | 24,103 | 58,447 | |||
| Total assets | 214,045 | 95,036 | 50,193 | 30,554 | 31,449 | 50,747 | 77,117 | 145,733 | 694,874 | |||
| Liabilities | ||||||||||||
| Deposits by banks1,3 | 32,275 | 2,177 | 960 | 785 | 492 | 353 | 305 | 52 | 37,399 | |||
| Customer accounts1,4 | 328,121 | 52,370 | 25,043 | 10,602 | 11,165 | 3,470 | 1,512 | 2,731 | 435,014 | |||
| Derivative fi nancial instruments | 9,114 | 8,138 | 5,470 | 4,713 | 3,559 | 5,511 | 8,480 | 7,977 | 52,962 | |||
| Senior debt | – | 75 | 1,904 | 1,301 | 2,300 | 4,843 | 1,584 | 6,470 | 18,477 | |||
| Other debt securities in issue1 | 5,975 | 9,772 | 9,322 | 1,447 | 991 | 1,551 | 687 | 4,273 | 34,018 | |||
| Other liabilities | 27,583 | 5,922 | 3,474 | 696 | 643 | 646 | 775 | 10,730 | 50,469 | |||
| Subordinated liabilities and other borrowed funds |
24 | 17 | – | – | – | 755 | 3,283 | 10,968 | 15,047 | |||
| Total liabilities | 403,092 | 78,471 | 46,173 | 19,544 | 19,150 | 17,129 | 16,626 | 43,201 | 643,386 | |||
| Net liquidity gap | (189,047) | 16,565 | 4,020 | 11,010 | 12,299 | 33,618 | 60,491 | 102,532 | 51,488 | |||
1 Loans and advances, investment securities, deposits by banks, customer accounts and debt securities in issue include fi nancial instruments held at fair value through profi t or loss, see note 12 (pages 101 to 124)
2 Loans and advances include reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending borrowing of \$64.4 billion
3 Deposits by banks include repurchase agreements and other similar secured borrowing of \$6.2 billion
4 Customer accounts include repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending borrowing of \$46.7 billion
| 31.12.17 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| One month or less \$million |
Between one month and three months \$million |
Between three months and six months \$million |
Between six months and nine months \$million |
Between nine months and one year \$million |
Between one year and two years \$million |
Between two years and fi ve years \$million |
More than fi ve years and undated \$million |
Total \$million |
|
| Assets | |||||||||
| Cash and balances at central banks |
49,103 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 9,761 | 58,864 |
| Derivative fi nancial instruments | 6,284 | 7,706 | 5,930 | 3,537 | 2,601 | 5,427 | 7,111 | 8,435 | 47,031 |
| Loans and advances to banks1,2 | 36,548 | 21,238 | 12,042 | 4,299 | 3,612 | 1,588 | 1,386 | 612 | 81,325 |
| Loans and advances to customers1,2 |
87,794 | 32,618 | 17,459 | 11,357 | 8,545 | 17,500 | 37,237 | 73,043 | 285,553 |
| Investment securities | 14,185 | 18,208 | 13,692 | 11,213 | 9,145 | 22,369 | 31,660 | 17,715 | 138,187 |
| Other assets | 19,349 | 4,466 | 2,521 | 105 | 247 | 138 | 127 | 25,588 | 52,541 |
| Total assets | 213,263 | 84,236 | 51,644 | 30,511 | 24,150 | 47,022 | 77,521 | 135,154 | 663,501 |
| Liabilities | |||||||||
| Deposits by banks1,3 | 29,365 | 2,484 | 1,437 | 530 | 730 | 154 | 135 | 651 | 35,486 |
| Customer accounts1,4 | 327,434 | 37,178 | 19,716 | 10,775 | 9,321 | 3,115 | 1,746 | 2,439 | 411,724 |
| Derivative fi nancial instruments | 8,018 | 8,035 | 6,068 | 3,544 | 2,685 | 5,057 | 7,794 | 6,900 | 48,101 |
| Senior debt | 67 | 273 | 1,801 | 53 | 1,937 | 5,053 | 4,747 | 5,585 | 19,516 |
| Other debt securities in issue1 | 4,139 | 10,616 | 9,954 | 2,005 | 779 | 1,091 | 794 | 4,508 | 33,886 |
| Other liabilities | 20,428 | 5,988 | 3,672 | 671 | 303 | 696 | 897 | 13,150 | 45,805 |
| Subordinated liabilities and other borrowed funds |
– | 116 | 1,382 | – | – | – | 3,887 | 11,791 | 17,176 |
| Total liabilities | 389,451 | 64,690 | 44,030 | 17,578 | 15,755 | 15,166 | 20,000 | 45,024 | 611,694 |
| Net liquidity gap | (176,188) | 19,546 | 7,614 | 12,933 | 8,395 | 31,856 | 57,521 | 90,130 | 51,807 |
1 Loans and advances, investment securities, deposits by banks, customer accounts and debt securities in issue include fi nancial instruments held at fair value through profi t or loss, see note 12 (pages 101 to 124)
2 Loans and advances include reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending borrowing of \$55.2 billion
3 Deposits by banks include repurchase agreements and other similar secured borrowing of \$3.8 billion
4 Customer accounts include repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending borrowing of \$36.0 billion
Behavioural maturity of fi nancial assets and liabilities
The cash fl ows presented in the previous section refl ect the cash fl ows that will be contractually payable over the residual maturity of the instruments. However, contractual maturities do not necessarily refl ect the timing of actual repayments or cash fl ow. In practice, certain assets and liabilities behave differently from their contractual terms, especially for short-term customer accounts, credit card balances and overdrafts, which extend to a longer period than their contractual maturity. On the other hand, mortgage balances tend to have a shorter repayment period than their contractual maturity date. Expected customer behaviour is assessed and managed on a country basis using qualitative and quantitative techniques, including analysis of observed customer behaviour over time.
Maturity of fi nancial liabilities on an undiscounted basis
The following table analyses the contractual cash fl ows payable for the Group's fi nancial liabilities by remaining contractual maturities on an undiscounted basis. The fi nancial liability balances in the table below will not agree to the balances reported in the consolidated balance sheet as the table incorporates all contractual cash fl ows, on an undiscounted basis, relating to both principal and interest payments. Derivatives not treated as hedging derivatives are included in the "On demand" time bucket and not by contractual maturity.
Within the 'More than fi ve years and undated' maturity band are undated fi nancial liabilities, all of which relate to subordinated debt, on which interest payments are not included as this information would not be meaningful given the instruments are undated. Interest payments on these instruments are included within the relevant maturities up to fi ve years.
| 30.06.18 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| One month or less \$million |
Between one month and three months \$million |
Between three months and six months \$million |
Between six months and nine months \$million |
Between nine months and one year \$million |
Between one year and two years \$million |
Between two years and fi ve years \$million |
More than fi ve years and undated \$million |
Total \$million |
|
| Deposits by banks | 32,424 | 2,200 | 983 | 799 | 501 | 378 | 322 | 54 | 37,661 |
| Customer accounts | 328,393 | 52,643 | 26,110 | 10,765 | 11,344 | 3,546 | 1,644 | 3,273 | 437,718 |
| Derivative fi nancial instruments | 52,320 | 61 | 90 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 95 | 391 | 52,962 |
| Debt securities in issue | 5,987 | 9,845 | 11,395 | 2,765 | 3,552 | 6,722 | 2,856 | 12,244 | 55,366 |
| Subordinated liabilities and other borrowed funds |
91 | 133 | 341 | 81 | 504 | 1,761 | 11,832 | 32,632 | 47,375 |
| Other liabilities | 25,885 | 5,931 | 3,491 | 706 | 642 | 862 | 769 | 11,283 | 49,569 |
| Total liabilities | 445,100 | 70,813 | 42,410 | 15,119 | 16,544 | 13,270 | 17,518 | 59,877 | 680,651 |
| 31.12.17 (IAS 39) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| One month or less \$million |
Between one month and three months \$million |
Between three months and six months \$million |
Between six months and nine months \$million |
Between nine months and one year \$million |
Between one year and two years \$million |
Between two years and fi ve years \$million |
More than fi ve years and undated \$million |
Total \$million |
|
| Deposits by banks | 29,427 | 2,497 | 1,460 | 545 | 743 | 160 | 150 | 697 | 35,679 |
| Customer accounts | 327,501 | 37,353 | 20,720 | 10,901 | 9,463 | 3,178 | 1,840 | 2,919 | 413,875 |
| Derivative fi nancial instruments1 | 47,267 | – | 3 | – | 153 | 166 | 246 | 266 | 48,101 |
| Debt securities in issue | 4,287 | 10,888 | 11,878 | 2,141 | 2,876 | 6,550 | 6,163 | 11,769 | 56,552 |
| Subordinated liabilities and other borrowed funds |
126 | 207 | 1,490 | 210 | 166 | 657 | 3,726 | 19,356 | 25,938 |
| Other liabilities | 20,800 | 6,052 | 3,676 | 681 | 324 | 720 | 929 | 11,241 | 44,423 |
| Total liabilities | 429,408 | 56,997 | 39,227 | 14,478 | 13,725 | 11,431 | 13,054 | 46,248 | 624,568 |
1 Derivatives are on a discounted basis
Interest Rate Risk in the Banking Book (unaudited)
The following table provides the estimated impact on the Group's Earnings of a 50 basis point parallel shock (up and down) across all yield curves. The sensitivities shown represent the estimated change in base case projected net interest income (NII), plus the change in interest rate implied income and expense from FX swaps used to manage Banking Book currency positions, under the two interest rate shock scenarios.
The interest rate sensitivities are indicative and based on simplifi ed scenarios, estimating the aggregate impact of an instantaneous 50 basis point parallel shock across all yield curves over a one-year horizon, including the time taken to implement changes to pricing before becoming effective. The assessment assumes that non-interest rate sensitive aspects of the size and mix of the balance sheet remain constant and that there are no specifi c management actions in response to the change in rates. No assumptions are made in relation to the impact on credit spreads in a changing rate environment.
Signifi cant modelling and behavioural assumptions are made regarding scenario simplifi cation, market competition, pass-through rates, asset and liability re-pricing tenors, and price fl ooring. In particular, the assumption that interest rates of all currencies and maturities shift by the same amount concurrently, and that no actions are taken to mitigate the impacts arising from this are considered unlikely. Reported sensitivities will vary over time due to a number of factors including changes in balance sheet composition, market conditions, customer behaviour and risk management strategy and should therefore not be considered an income or profi t forecast.
| 30.06.18 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USD bloc \$million |
HKD, SGD & KRW bloc \$million |
Other currency bloc \$million |
Total \$million |
|||
| + 50 basis points | 90 | 130 | 80 | 300 | ||
| - 50 basis points | (80) | (100) | (80) | (260) |
Estimated one-year impact to earnings from a parallel shift in yield curves at the beginning of the period of:
| 31.12.17 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USD bloc \$million |
HKD, SGD & KRW bloc \$million |
Other currency bloc \$million |
Total \$million |
|||
| + 50 basis points | 70 | 120 | 140 | 330 | ||
| - 50 basis points | (50) | (100) | (140) | (290) |
As at 30 June 2018, the Group estimates the one-year impact of an instantaneous, parallel increase across all yield curves of 50 basis points to be an earnings benefi t of \$300 million. The corresponding impact from a parallel decrease of 50 basis points would result in an earnings reduction of \$260 million.
The benefi t from rising interest rates is primarily from reinvesting at higher yields and from assets re-pricing faster and to a greater extent than deposits. The current estimate for USD sensitivity has reduced on an underlying basis since December 2017 on rising deposit sensitivity to changes in interest rates.
The reported USD sensitivity has increased due to short term currency management, with an offsetting reduction in the sensitivity for other currencies.
The USD sensitivity is impacted by the dampening effect due to the asymmetry of funding Trading Book assets with Banking Book liabilities. The sensitivities include the cost of Banking Book liabilities used to fund the Trading Book, however the revenue associated with the Trading Book positions is recognised in net trading income. This asymmetry in both the up and down scenarios should be broadly offset within total operating income.
Operational risk (unaudited)
Operational risks arise from the broad scope of activities carried out across the Group. Risks associated with these activities are mapped into a Group Process Universe where a standardised operational risk management approach is applied to mitigate the risks. We benchmark practices against industry standards and regulatory requirements.
Operational risk profi le
The operational risk profi le is the Group's overall exposure to operational risk at a given point in time, covering all applicable operational risk sub-types. The operational risk profi le comprises both operational risk events and losses that have already occurred and the current exposures to operational risks which, at an aggregate level, includes the consideration of top risks and emerging risks.
Other principal risks (unaudited)
Losses arising from our other principal risks (compliance, conduct, reputational, information and cyber security and fi nancial crime) would be captured under operational losses.
Capital review
The Capital review provides an analysis of the Group's capital and leverage position and requirements.
Capital summary
The Group's capital and leverage position is managed within the Board-approved risk appetite. The Group is well capitalised with low leverage and high levels of loss-absorbing capacity.
| Capital, leverage and RWA | 30.06.18 | 31.12.17 |
|---|---|---|
| CET1 capital % | 14.2 | 13.6 |
| Tier 1 capital % | 16.6 | 16.0 |
| Total capital % | 21.3 | 21.0 |
| UK leverage % | 5.8 | 6.0 |
| RWA (\$million) | 271,867 | 279,748 |
The Group's Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital and Tier 1 leverage position were ahead of both the current requirements and the expected end-state requirements for 2019. For further detail see the half year 2018 Standard Chartered PLC Pillar 3 Disclosures section on Capital.
The Group's current Pillar 2A requirement is 3.1 per cent of RWA of which at least 1.7 per cent must be held in CET1. This requirement is expected to vary over time.
Based on the Group's current Pillar 2A requirement, the Group's minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL) is expected to be 16.0 per cent of RWA in 2019 rising to 19.1 per cent of RWA in 2020 and 22.2 per cent of RWA from 1 January 2022. The Group's combined buffer (comprising the capital conservation, global systemically important institution (G-SII) and countercyclical buffers) sits above its MREL requirement, resulting in a total lossabsorbing capacity requirement of 26.0 per cent of RWA from 1 January 2022 based on the Group's CRD IV capital buffers that are currently known. The Group estimates that its MREL position was around 26.4 per cent of RWA and around 9.6 per cent of leverage exposure at 30 June 2018.
The Group continued its programme of MREL issuance from its holding company in the fi rst half of 2018, issuing \$1.9 billion of MREL eligible securities across Tier 2 and senior debt during the period including the Group's inaugural issuance of US dollar callable senior notes. As part of its proactive approach to capital management, the Group successfully conducted a liability management exercise in respect of a number of its GBP denominated subordinated and senior securities.
Regulatory update
The European Commission is proposing amendments to the Capital Requirements Regulation, CRD IV, the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive and the Single Resolution Mechanism Regulation. Any proposed reforms remain subject to change and until the proposals are in fi nal form it is uncertain how they will affect the Group.
In February 2018, the Group implemented changes to the loss given default (LGD) models for certain corporate and institutional exposures. These changes refl ect the PRA's guidance on LGD estimates for low default portfolios and include the application of various LGD fl oors based on the Foundation IRB approach. These changes did not materially impact the Group's CET1 ratio.
The Group continues to engage on a proactive basis with the PRA in the review of its risk models, including further LGD changes to product specifi c models. These changes are not currently expected to materially impact the CET1 ratio, however the timing and exact impact will depend on the fi nal outcome of the discussions and is subject to PRA approval.
The Group remains a G-SII, with a 1.0 per cent G-SII CET1 buffer which phases in at a rate of 0.25 per cent per year and will be fully implemented by 1 January 2019. The Standard Chartered PLC 2017 G-SII disclosure is published at: http://investors.sc.com/fullyearresults
In line with previous guidance, the decrease in the CET1 capital ratio on adoption of the IFRS 9 accounting standard was around 15 basis points after considering the offset against existing regulatory expected losses. Under transitional rules, the day one impact on the CET1 ratio was negligible.
Capital ratios (unaudited)
| 30.06. 18 | 31.12.17 | |
|---|---|---|
| CET1 | 14.2% | 13.6% |
| Tier 1 capital | 16.6% | 16.0% |
| Total capital | 21.3% | 21.0% |
CRD IV Capital base
| 30.06.18 \$million |
31.12.17 \$million |
|
|---|---|---|
| CET1 instruments and reserves | ||
| Capital instruments and the related share premium accounts | 5,607 | 5,603 |
| Of which: share premium accounts | 3,957 | 3,957 |
| Retained earnings | 25,849 | 25,316 |
| Accumulated other comprehensive income (and other reserves) | 11,989 | 12,766 |
| Non-controlling interests (amount allowed in consolidated CET1) | 695 | 850 |
| Independently reviewed interim and year-end profi ts | 1,557 | 1,227 |
| Foreseeable dividends net of scrip | (453) | (399) |
| CET1 capital before regulatory adjustments1 | 45,244 | 45,363 |
| CET1 regulatory adjustments | ||
| Additional value adjustments (prudential valuation adjustments) | (496) | (574) |
| Intangible assets (net of related tax liability) | (4,991) | (5,112) |
| Deferred tax assets that rely on future profi tability (excludes those arising from temporary differences) | (129) | (125) |
| Fair value reserves related to net losses on cash fl ow hedges | (1) | 45 |
| Deduction of amounts resulting from the calculation of excess expected loss | (683) | (1,142) |
| Net gains on liabilities at fair value resulting from changes in own credit risk | (188) | (53) |
| Defi ned-benefi t pension fund assets | (39) | (40) |
| Fair value gains arising from the institution's own credit risk related to derivative liabilities | (83) | (59) |
| Exposure amounts which could qualify for risk weighting of 1,250% | (122) | (141) |
| Total regulatory adjustments to CET1 | (6,732) | (7,201) |
| CET1 capital | 38,512 | 38,162 |
| Additional Tier 1 capital (AT1) instruments | 6,712 | 6,719 |
| AT1 regulatory adjustments | (20) | (20) |
| Tier 1 capital | 45,204 | 44,861 |
| Tier 2 capital instruments | 12,845 | 13,927 |
| Tier 2 regulatory adjustments | (30) | (30) |
| Tier 2 capital | 12,815 | 13,897 |
| Total capital | 58,019 | 58,758 |
| Total risk-weighted assets (unaudited) | 271,867 | 279,748 |
1 CET1 capital before regulatory adjustments is prepared on the regulatory scope of consolidation
Movement in total capital
| 6 months ended 30.06.18 \$million |
6 months ended 31.12.17 \$million |
|
|---|---|---|
| CET1 at 1 January/1 July | 38,162 | 37,781 |
| Ordinary shares issued in the period and share premium | 4 | 2 |
| Profi t for the period | 1,557 | 37 |
| Foreseeable dividends net of scrip deducted from CET1 | (453) | (399) |
| Difference between dividends paid and foreseeable dividends | (165) | 292 |
| Movement in goodwill and other intangible assets | 121 | (9) |
| Foreign currency translation differences | (781) | 583 |
| Non-controlling interests | (155) | 17 |
| Movement in eligible other comprehensive income | 135 | 1 |
| Deferred tax assets that rely on future profi tability | (4) | 99 |
| Decrease in excess expected loss1 | 459 | (98) |
| Additional value adjustments (prudential valuation adjustment) | 78 | (17) |
| Own credit gains | (24) | (60) |
| Exposure amounts which could qualify for risk weighting | 19 | 11 |
| Other1 | (441) | (78) |
| CET1 at 30 June/31 December | 38,512 | 38,162 |
| AT1 at 1 January/1 July | 6,699 | 6,688 |
| Foreign currency translation difference | (7) | 11 |
| AT1 at 30 June/31 December | 6,692 | 6,699 |
| Tier 2 capital at 1 January/1 July | 13,897 | 13,866 |
| Regulatory amortisation | 627 | 1,342 |
| Issuances net of redemptions | (1,713) | (1,752) |
| Foreign currency translation difference | (122) | 283 |
| Tier 2 ineligible minority interest | 115 | 155 |
| Other | 11 | 3 |
| Tier 2 capital at 30 June/31 December | 12,815 | 13,897 |
| Total capital at 30 June/31 December | 58,019 | 58,758 |
1 Includes day one transitional impact on the adoption of IFRS 9 accounting standards
The main movements in capital in the period were:
- ¼ The CET1 ratio increased to 14.2 per cent due to a \$0.4 billion increase in CET1 and a \$7.9 billion decrease in RWA
- ¼ CET1 capital increased by \$0.4 billion, as profi t after tax was offset in part by distributions and FX translation
- ¼ AT1 remained at \$6.7 billion during the period
- ¼ Tier 2 capital reduced by \$1.1 billion to \$12.8 billion as redemptions and the impact of the liability management exercise more than offset the new issuance of \$0.5 billion of Tier 2 in the period.
Risk-weighted assets by business (unaudited)
| 30.06.18 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Credit risk \$million |
Operational risk \$million |
Market risk \$million |
Total risk \$million |
|
| Corporate & Institutional Banking | 105,190 | 13,029 | 20,516 | 138,735 |
| Retail Banking | 35,361 | 7,358 | – | 42,719 |
| Commercial Banking | 30,491 | 2,770 | – | 33,261 |
| Private Banking | 5,510 | 758 | – | 6,268 |
| Central & other items | 46,646 | 4,135 | 103 | 50,884 |
| Total risk-weighted assets | 223,198 | 28,050 | 20,619 | 271,867 |
| 31.12.17 | ||||
| Credit risk \$million |
Operational risk \$million |
Market risk \$million |
Total risk \$million |
|
| Corporate & Institutional Banking | 109,368 | 14,740 | 22,994 | 147,102 |
| Retail Banking | 36,345 | 7,761 | – | 44,106 |
| Commercial Banking | 29,712 | 3,356 | – | 33,068 |
| Private Banking | 5,134 | 809 | – | 5,943 |
| Central & other items | 45,671 | 3,812 | 46 | 49,529 |
| Total risk-weighted assets | 226,230 | 30,478 | 23,040 | 279,748 |
Risk-weighted assets by geographic region (unaudited)
| 30.06.18 \$million |
31.12.17 \$million |
|
|---|---|---|
| Greater China & North Asia | 83,422 | 84,593 |
| ASEAN & South Asia | 95,719 | 96,733 |
| Africa & Middle East | 53,755 | 56,437 |
| Europe & Americas | 41,193 | 44,735 |
| Central & other items | (2,222) | (2,750) |
| Total risk-weighted assets | 271,867 | 279,748 |
Movement in risk-weighted assets (unaudited)
| Credit risk | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate & Institutional Banking \$million |
Retail Banking \$million |
Commercial Banking \$million |
Private Banking \$million |
Central & other items \$million |
Total \$million |
Operational risk \$million |
Market risk \$million |
Total risk \$million |
|
| At 1 January 2017 | 106,834 | 33,210 | 27,553 | 5,129 | 41,149 | 213,875 | 33,693 | 21,877 | 269,445 |
| Assets (decline)/growth | (78) | 1,053 | 1,228 | (123) | 1,819 | 3,899 | – | – | 3,899 |
| Net credit migration | 1,630 | (48) | (205) | – | 157 | 1,534 | – | – | 1,534 |
| Risk-weighted assets effi ciencies | (1,661) | – | – | – | – | (1,661) | – | – | (1,661) |
| Model, methodology and policy changes |
– | – | – | – | – | – | – | 80 | 80 |
| Disposals | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Foreign currency translation | 1,268 | 959 | 393 | 73 | 381 | 3,074 | – | – | 3,074 |
| Other non-credit risk movements | – | – | – | – | – | – | (3,215) | 1,007 | (2,208) |
| At 30 June 2017 | 107,993 | 35,174 | 28,969 | 5,079 | 43,506 | 220,721 | 30,478 | 22,964 | 274,163 |
| Assets (decline)/growth | (6,285) | 1,296 | 745 | 568 | 454 | (3,222) | – | – | (3,222) |
| Net credit migration | 2,405 | 122 | (260) | – | (148) | 2,119 | – | – | 2,119 |
| Risk-weighted assets effi ciencies | (634) | – | – | – | – | (634) | – | – | (634) |
| Model, methodology and policy changes |
4,990 | (368) | – | (575) | 2,372 | 6,419 | – | (2,258) | 4,161 |
| Disposals | – | (710) | – | – | (443) | (1,153) | – | – | (1,153) |
| Foreign currency translation | 899 | 831 | 258 | 62 | (70) | 1,980 | – | – | 1,980 |
| Other non-credit risk movements | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 2,334 | 2,334 |
| At 31 December 2017 | 109,368 | 36,345 | 29,712 | 5,134 | 45,671 | 226,230 | 30,478 | 23,040 | 279,748 |
| Assets growth | 1,473 | 557 | 1,019 | 426 | 2,573 | 6,048 | – | – | 6,048 |
| Net credit migration | (2,317) | (191) | 321 | – | 244 | (1,943) | – | – | (1,943) |
| Risk-weighted assets effi ciencies |
(325) | – | – | – | – | (325) | – | – | (325) |
| Model, methodology and policy changes |
(1,769) | (591) | 6 | – | 76 | (2,278) | – | (1,138) | (3,416) |
| Disposals | – | – | – | – | (626) | (626) | – | – | (626) |
| Foreign currency translation | (1,240) | (759) | (567) | (50) | (1,292) | (3,908) | – | – | (3,908) |
| Other non-credit risk movements |
– | – | – | – | – | – | (2,428) | (1,283) | (3,711) |
| At 30 June 2018 | 105,190 | 35,361 | 30,491 | 5,510 | 46,646 | 223,198 | 28,050 | 20,619 | 271,867 |
Movements in risk-weighted assets
RWA decreased by \$7.9 billion, or 2.8 per cent from 31 December 2017 to \$271.9 billion. This was due to a decrease in credit risk RWA of \$3.0 billion and \$2.4 billion reduction in both market and operational risk RWA respectively.
Corporate & Institutional Banking
Credit risk RWA decreased by \$4.2 billion to \$105.2 billion mainly due to:
- ¼ \$2.3 billion decrease due to net credit migration in ASA and AME
- ¼ \$1.8 billion decrease in model, methodology and policy changes, due to PRA approved IRB model changes relating to LGD parameters
- ¼ \$1.2 billion decrease from foreign currency translation due to depreciation of currencies in India, Europe and South Africa
- ¼ \$0.3 billion decrease due to effi ciencies in fi nancial markets through novation, trade compressions and process enhancement in collateral recognition
- ¼ \$1.5 billion RWA increase from corporate fi nance and fi nancial markets.
Retail Banking
Credit risk RWA decreased by \$1.0 billion to \$35.4 billion mainly due to:
- ¼ \$0.8 billion decrease from foreign currency translation due to depreciation of currencies in Korea, India and Singapore
- ¼ \$0.6 billion RWA save due to model changes in mortgages partially offset by credit cards in ASA
- ¼ \$0.2 billion decrease due to net credit migration in GCNA
- ¼ \$0.6 billion RWA increase from mortgages and personal loans in GCNA and ASA.
Commercial Banking
Credit risk RWA increased by \$0.8 billion to \$30.5 billion mainly due to:
- ¼ \$1.0 billion RWA increase from lending and transaction banking
- ¼ \$0.3 billion increase due to net credit migration in GCNA
- ¼ \$0.6 billion decrease from foreign currency translation due to depreciation of currencies in India, Pakistan and Korea.
Private Banking
Credit risk RWA increased by \$0.4 billion to \$5.5 billion principally due to asset balance growth in wealth management products.
Central & other items
Credit risk RWA increased by \$1.0 billion to \$46.6 billion mainly due to:
- ¼ \$2.6 billion increase in credit risk RWA mainly due to treasury activities, and higher RWA balances for investments in joint ventures
- ¼ \$0.2 billion increase due to net credit migration
- ¼ \$0.1 billion increase in model, methodology and policy changes, due to PRA IRB model changes relating to LGD parameters
- ¼ \$1.3 billion decrease from foreign currency translation due to depreciation of currencies in Indonesia and Pakistan
- ¼ \$0.6 billion saving from the disposal of an investment in ASA.
Market risk
Total market risk RWA (MRWA) decreased by \$2.4 billion, or 10.5 per cent from 31 December 2017 to \$20.6 billion. This change was primarily due to:
- ¼ \$1.1 billion reduction in standard rules MRWA for foreign exchange and interest rate risk structured products, following their full recognition in internal models approach (IMA) MRWA from March 2018
- ¼ Reduction in trading book debt security holdings \$1.1 billion.
UK leverage ratio (unaudited)
Operational risk
Operational risk RWA reduced by \$2.4 billion to \$28.0 billion, due to a decrease in the average income over a rolling three-year time horizon, as lower 2017 income replaced higher 2014 income. This represents a 7.9 per cent year-on-year reduction in operational risk RWA.
UK leverage ratio (unaudited)
The Group's UK leverage ratio, which excludes qualifying claims on central banks in accordance with a PRA waiver, was 5.8 per cent, which is above the current minimum requirement of 3.6 per cent.
The lower UK leverage ratio in the period was a result of an increased exposure measure partly offset by a small increase in Tier 1 capital (end point).
| 30.06.18 \$million |
31.12.17 \$million |
|
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 capital (transitional) | 45,204 | 44,861 |
| Additional Tier 1 capital subject to phase out | (1,752) | (1,758) |
| Tier 1 capital (end point) | 43,452 | 43,103 |
| Derivative fi nancial instruments | 51,780 | 47,031 |
| Derivative cash collateral | 10,002 | 9,513 |
| Securities fi nancing transactions (SFTs) | 64,421 | 55,187 |
| Loans and advances and other assets | 568,671 | 551,770 |
| Total on-balance sheet assets | 694,874 | 663,501 |
| Regulatory consolidation adjustments1 | (45,538) | (31,712) |
| Derivatives adjustments | ||
| Derivatives netting | (35,847) | (29,830) |
| Adjustments to cash collateral | (21,311) | (18,411) |
| Net written credit protection | 1,358 | 1,360 |
| Potential future exposure on derivatives | 32,225 | 30,027 |
| Total derivatives adjustments | (23,575) | (16,854) |
| Counterparty risk leverage exposure measure for SFTs | 14,309 | 13,238 |
| Off-balance sheet items | 109,943 | 96,260 |
| Regulatory deductions from Tier 1 capital | (6,461) | (7,089) |
| UK leverage exposure (end point) | 743,552 | 717,344 |
| UK leverage ratio (end point) | 5.8% | 6.0% |
| UK leverage exposure quarterly average | 736,599 | 723,508 |
| UK leverage ratio quarterly average | 5.9% | 6.0% |
| Countercyclical leverage ratio buffer | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| G-SII additional leverage ratio buffer | 0.3% | 0.2% |
1 Includes adjustment for qualifying central bank claims
Statement of directors' responsibilities
We confi rm that to the best of our knowledge:
- ¼ The condensed consolidated interim fi nancial statements have been prepared in accordance with IAS 34 Interim Financial Reporting as adopted by the EU
- ¼ The interim management report includes a fair review of the information required by:
- (a) DTR 4.2.7R of the Disclosure and Transparency Rules, being an indication of important events that have occurred during the six months ended 30 June 2018 and their impact on the condensed consolidated interim fi nancial statements; and a description of the principal risks and uncertainties for the remaining six months of the year
- (b) DTR 4.2.8R of the Disclosure and Transparency Rules, being related party transactions that have taken place during the six months ended 30 June 2018 that have materially affected the fi nancial position or performance of the entity during that period; and any changes in the related party transactions described in the last annual report that could have materially affected the fi nancial position or performance of the entity during that period
By order of the Board
Andy Halford Group Chief Financial Offi cer
31 July 2018
Independent review report
to Standard Chartered PLC
Conclusion
We have been engaged by Standard Chartered PLC including its subsidiaries (the Group) to review the condensed consolidated set of fi nancial statements in the half-yearly fi nancial report for the six months ended 30 June 2018 which comprises the condensed consolidated interim balance sheet, the condensed consolidated interim income statement, the condensed consolidated interim statement of comprehensive income, the condensed consolidated interim statement of changes in equity, the condensed consolidated interim cash fl ow statement, and the related explanatory notes.
Based on our review, nothing has come to our attention that causes us to believe that the condensed consolidated set of fi nancial statements in the half-yearly fi nancial report for the six months ended 30 June 2018 is not prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with IAS 34 Interim Financial Reporting as adopted by the EU and the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules ("the DTR") of the UK's Financial Conduct Authority ("the UK FCA").
Scope of review
We conducted our review in accordance with International Standard on Review Engagements (UK and Ireland) 2410 Review of Interim Financial Information Performed by the Independent Auditor of the Entity issued by the Auditing Practices Board for use in the UK. A review of interim fi nancial information consists of making enquiries, primarily of persons responsible for fi nancial and accounting matters, and applying analytical and other review procedures. We read the other information contained in the half-yearly fi nancial report and consider whether it contains any apparent misstatements or material inconsistencies with the information in the condensed set of fi nancial statements.
A review is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) and consequently does not enable us to obtain assurance that we would become aware of all signifi cant matters that might be identifi ed in an audit. Accordingly, we do not express an audit opinion.
Directors' responsibilities
The half-yearly fi nancial report is the responsibility of, and has been approved by, the directors. The directors are responsible for preparing the half-yearly fi nancial report in accordance with the DTR of the UK FCA.
As disclosed in note 1, the annual fi nancial statements of the Group are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the EU. The directors are responsible for preparing the condensed set of fi nancial statements included in the half-yearly fi nancial report in accordance with IAS 34 as adopted by the EU.
Our responsibility
Our responsibility is to express to the Group a conclusion on the condensed consolidated set of fi nancial statements in the half-yearly fi nancial report based on our review.
The purpose of our review work and to whom we owe our responsibilities
This report is made solely to the Group in accordance with the terms of our engagement to assist the Group in meeting the requirements of the DTR of the UK FCA. Our review has been undertaken so that we might state to the Group those matters we are required to state to it in this report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the Group for our review work, for this report, or for the conclusions we have reached.
Michelle Hinchliffe for and on behalf of KPMG LLP
Chartered Accountants 15 Canada Square London E14 5GL 31 July 2018
Condensed consolidated interim income statement
For the six months ended 30 June 2018
| Notes | 6 months ended 30.06.18 \$million |
6 months ended 31.12.17 \$million |
6 months ended 30.06.17 \$million |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interest income | 8,227 | 7,650 | 6,785 | |
| Interest expense | (3,866) | (3,435) | (2,819) | |
| Net interest income | 4,361 | 4,215 | 3,966 | |
| Fees and commission income | 2,114 | 1,961 | 1,981 | |
| Fees and commission expense | (245) | (182) | (248) | |
| Net fee and commission income | 3 | 1,869 | 1,779 | 1,733 |
| Net trading income | 4 | 966 | 554 | 973 |
| Other operating income | 5 | 431 | 656 | 549 |
| Operating income | 7,627 | 7,204 | 7,221 | |
| Staff costs | (3,578) | (3,495) | (3,263) | |
| Premises costs | (373) | (437) | (386) | |
| General administrative expenses | (808) | (1,171) | (836) | |
| Depreciation and amortisation | (426) | (444) | (385) | |
| Operating expenses | 6 | (5,185) | (5,547) | (4,870) |
| Operating profi t before impairment losses and taxation | 2,442 | 1,657 | 2,351 | |
| Credit impairment | 7 | (214) | (707) | (655) |
| Other impairment | 8 | |||
| Goodwill | – | (320) | – | |
| Other | (50) | (86) | (93) | |
| Profi t from associates and joint ventures | 168 | 117 | 151 | |
| Profi t before taxation | 2,346 | 661 | 1,754 | |
| Taxation | 9 | (753) | (599) | (548) |
| Profi t for the period | 1,593 | 62 | 1,206 | |
| Profi t attributable to: | ||||
| Non-controlling interests | 33 | 39 | 10 | |
| Parent company shareholders | 1,560 | 23 | 1,196 | |
| Profi t for the period | 1,593 | 62 | 1,206 | |
| cents | cents | cents | ||
| Earnings per share: | ||||
| Basic earnings/(loss) per ordinary share | 11 | 40.7 | (6.0) | 29.5 |
| Diluted earnings/(loss) per ordinary share | 11 | 40.2 | (6.0) | 29.2 |
The notes on pages 85 to 139 form an integral part of these fi nancial statements.
Condensed consolidated interim statement of comprehensive income
For the six months ended 30 June 2018
| Notes | 6 months ended 30.06.18 \$million |
6 months ended 31.12.17 \$million |
6 months ended 30.06.17 \$million |
|---|---|---|---|
| Profi t for the period | 1,593 | 62 | 1,206 |
| Other comprehensive income/(loss) | |||
| Items that will not be reclassifi ed to Income statement: | 253 | 103 | (341) |
| Own credit gains/(losses) on fi nancial liabilities designated at fair value through profi t or loss |
136 | 61 | (310) |
| Equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income | 19 | – | – |
| Actuarial gains/(losses) on retirement benefi t obligations 22 |
105 | 61 | (29) |
| Taxation relating to components of other comprehensive income | (7) | (19) | (2) |
| Items that may be reclassifi ed subsequently to Income statement: | (826) | 529 | 1,003 |
| Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations: | |||
| Net (losses)/gains taken to equity | (1,008) | 745 | 892 |
| Net gains/(losses) on net investment hedges | 216 | (177) | (111) |
| Share of other comprehensive income/(loss) from associates and joint ventures | 16 | 14 | (15) |
| Debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income/available for sale investments: |
|||
| Net valuation (losses)/gains taken to equity | (119) | 54 | 315 |
| Reclassifi ed to income statement | 13 | (131) | (102) |
| Net impact of expected credit losses | (8) | – | – |
| Cash fl ow hedges: | |||
| Net gains taken to equity | 49 | 3 | 32 |
| Reclassifi ed to income statement | 5 | 11 | – |
| Taxation relating to components of other comprehensive income | 10 | 10 | (8) |
| Other comprehensive (loss)/income for the period, net of taxation | (573) | 632 | 662 |
| Total comprehensive income for the period | 1,020 | 694 | 1,868 |
| Total comprehensive income attributable to: | |||
| Non-controlling interests | 25 | 37 | 13 |
| Parent company shareholders | 995 | 657 | 1,855 |
| 1,020 | 694 | 1,868 |
Condensed consolidated interim balance sheet
As at 30 June 2018
| Notes | 30.06.18 \$million |
31.12.171 \$million |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Assets | |||
| Cash and balances at central banks | 12 | 58,213 | 58,864 |
| Financial assets held at fair value through profi t or loss | 12 | 79,869 | 27,564 |
| Derivative fi nancial instruments | 12,13 | 51,780 | 47,031 |
| Loans and advances to banks | 12 | 55,603 | 57,494 |
| Loans and advances to customers | 12 | 255,100 | 248,707 |
| Reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending | 12,14 | 12,781 | 54,275 |
| Investment securities | 12 | 123,081 | 117,025 |
| Other assets | 16 | 39,068 | 33,490 |
| Current tax assets | 366 | 491 | |
| Prepayments and accrued income | 2,418 | 2,307 | |
| Interests in associates and joint ventures | 2,345 | 2,307 | |
| Goodwill and intangible assets | 15 | 4,974 | 5,013 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 7,326 | 7,211 | |
| Deferred tax assets | 1,290 | 1,177 | |
| Assets classifi ed as held for sale | 16 | 660 | 545 |
| Total assets | 694,874 | 663,501 | |
| Liabilities | |||
| Deposits by banks | 12 | 30,816 | 30,945 |
| Customer accounts | 12 | 382,107 | 370,509 |
| Repurchase agreements and other similar secured borrowing | 12,14 | 5,863 | 39,783 |
| Financial liabilities held at fair value through profi t or loss | 12 | 63,274 | 16,633 |
| Derivative fi nancial instruments | 12,13 | 52,962 | 48,101 |
| Debt securities in issue | 12 | 46,196 | 46,379 |
| Other liabilities | 17 | 40,544 | 35,257 |
| Current tax liabilities | 622 | 376 | |
| Accruals and deferred income | 4,752 | 5,493 | |
| Subordinated liabilities and other borrowed funds | 12,20 | 15,047 | 17,176 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 455 | 404 | |
| Provisions for liabilities and charges | 400 | 183 | |
| Retirement benefi t obligations | 22 | 348 | 455 |
| Total liabilities | 643,386 | 611,694 | |
| Equity | |||
| Share capital and share premium account | 21 | 7,101 | 7,097 |
| Other reserves | 11,989 | 12,767 | |
| Retained earnings | 27,106 | 26,641 | |
| Total parent company shareholders' equity | 46,196 | 46,505 | |
| Other equity instruments Total equity excluding non-controlling interests |
21 | 4,961 51,157 |
4,961 51,466 |
| Non-controlling interests | 331 | 341 | |
| Total equity | 51,488 | 51,807 | |
| Total equity and liabilities | 694,874 | 663,501 | |
1 Prepared and disclosed on an IAS 39 basis. Refer to Note 1 Accounting policies
The notes on pages 85 to 139 form an integral part of these fi nancial statements.
Condensed consolidated interim statement of changes in equity
For the six months ended 30 June 2018
| Share capital and share premium account \$million |
Capital and merger reserves1 \$million |
Own credit adjustment reserve \$million |
Available -for-sale reserve \$million |
Fair value through other comprehensive income reserve – debt \$million |
Fair value through other comprehensive income reserve – equity \$million |
Cash fl ow hedge reserve \$million |
Translation reserve \$million |
Retained earnings \$million |
Parent company shareholders' equity \$million |
Other equity instruments \$million |
Non controlling interests \$million |
Total \$million |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As at 31 December 2017 |
7,097 | 17,129 | 54 | 83 | – | – | (45) | (4,454) 26,641 | 46,505 | 4,961 | 341 | 51,807 | |
| IFRS 9 Reclassifi cations2 |
– | – | – | (83) | (131) | 45 | – | – | 169 | – | – | – | – |
| IFRS 9 Re measurements2 |
– | – | – | – | – | 4 | – | – | 31 | 35 | – | – | 35 |
| Expected credit loss, net |
– | – | – | – | 65 | – | – | – | (1,074)3 | (1,009) | – | (8) | (1,017) |
| Tax impact | – | – | – | – | (11) | 5 | – | – | 179 | 173 | – | – | 173 |
| Impact of IFRS 9 on share of joint ventures and associates, net of tax |
– | – | – | – | – | (1) | – | – | (51) | (52) | – | – | (52) |
| IFRS 9 transition adjustments |
– | – | – | (83) | (77) | 53 | – | – | (746) | (853) | – | (8) | (861) |
| As at 1 January 2018 |
7,097 17,129 | 54 | – | (77) | 53 | (45) | (4,454) 25,895 | 45,652 | 4,961 | 333 50,946 | |||
| Profi t for the period |
– | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1,560 | 1,560 | – | 33 | 1,593 |
| Other comprehensive income/(loss) |
– | – | 132 | – | (103) | 37 | 46 | (783) | 1064 | (565) | – | (8) | (573) |
| Distributions | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | (27) | (27) |
| Shares issued, net of expenses |
4 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 4 | – | – | 4 |
| Net own shares adjustment |
– | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 7 | 7 | – | – | 7 |
| Share option expense, net of taxation |
– | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 97 | 97 | – | – | 97 |
| Dividends net of scrip5 |
– | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | (564) | (564) | – | – | (564) |
| Other movements | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 5 | 5 | – | – | 5 |
| As at 30 June 2018 |
7,101 17,129 | 186 | – | (180) | 90 | 1 | (5,237) 27,106 | 46,196 | 4,961 | 331 51,488 |
1 Includes capital reserve of \$5 million, capital redemption reserve of \$13 million and merger reserve of \$17,111 million
2 As per Note 27 Transition to IFRS 9 Financial Instruments
3 The Group's initial estimate of credit impairment provisions on adoption of IFRS 9 was \$6,720 million. Following refi nement of the Group's expected loss models, the estimate of the opening credit impairment provisions has been revised down by \$222 million to \$6,498 million, and the net expected credit loss of \$(1,296) million adjusted against retained earnings has similarly decreased by \$222 million to \$1,074 million
4 Comprises actuarial gain/(loss), net of taxation and share from associates and joint ventures \$106 million (\$96 million for the six months ended 31 December 2017 and \$(46) million for the six months ended 30 June 2017)
5 Comprises dividends paid net of scrip \$347 million (2017: \$nil) and dividends on preference shares classifi ed as equity and Additional Tier 1 securities \$217 million (\$220 million for the six months ended 31 December 2017 and \$225 million for the six months ended 30 June 2017)
Condensed consolidated interim statement of changes in equity continued
| Share capital and share premium account \$million |
Capital and merger reserves1 \$million |
Own credit adjustment reserve \$million |
Available -for-sale reserve \$million |
Fair value through other comprehensive income reserve – debt \$million |
Fair value through other comprehensive income reserve – equity \$million |
Cash fl ow hedge reserve \$million |
Translation reserve \$million |
Retained earnings \$million |
Parent company shareholders' equity \$million |
Other equity instruments \$million |
Non controlling interests \$million |
Total \$million |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At 1 January 2017 | 7,091 | 17,129 | 289 | (4) | – | – | (85) | (5,805) 25,753 | 44,368 | 3,969 | 321 48,658 | ||
| Profi t for the period |
– | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1,196 | 1,196 | – | 10 | 1,206 |
| Other comprehensive (loss)/income |
– | – | (296) | 192 | – | – | 28 | 781 | (46)2 | 659 | – | 3 | 662 |
| Distributions | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | (52) | (52) |
| Shares issued, net of expenses |
4 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 4 | – | – | 4 |
| Other equity instruments issued, net of expenses |
– | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 992 | – | 992 |
| Net own shares adjustment |
– | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 8 | 8 | – | – | 8 |
| Share option expense, net of taxation |
– | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 68 | 68 | – | – | 68 |
| Dividends3 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | (225) | (225) | – | – | (225) |
| Other movements4 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 17 | 17 | – | 24 | 41 |
| At 30 June 2017 | 7,095 | 17,129 | (7) | 188 | – | – | (57) | (5,024) 26,771 | 46,095 | 4,961 | 306 51,362 | ||
| Profi t for the period |
– | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 23 | 23 | – | 39 | 62 |
| Other comprehensive income/(loss) |
– | – | 61 | (105) | – | – | 12 | 570 | 962 | 634 | – | (2) | 632 |
| Distributions | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | 1 |
| Shares issued, net of expenses |
2 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 2 | – | – | 2 |
| Net own shares adjustment |
– | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 2 | 2 | – | – | 2 |
| Share option expense, net of taxation |
– | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 57 | 57 | – | – | 57 |
| Dividends3 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | (220) | (220) | – | – | (220) |
| Other movements5 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | (88) | (88) | – | (3) | (91) |
| As at 31 December 2017 |
7,097 | 17,129 | 54 | 83 | – | – | (45) | (4,454) 26,641 | 46,505 | 4,961 | 341 51,807 |
1 Includes capital reserve of \$5 million, capital redemption reserve of \$13 million and merger reserve of \$17,111 million
2 Comprises actuarial gain/(loss), net of taxation and share from associates and joint ventures of \$96 million for the six months ended 31 December 2017 and \$(46) million for the six months ended 30 June 2017
3 Comprises dividends on preference shares classifi ed as equity and Additional Tier 1 securities \$220 million for the six months ended 31 December 2017 and \$225 million for the six months ended 30 June 2017
4 Mainly due to additional share capital issued including the premium by Nepal to its non-controlling interests of \$32 million and \$9 million with respect to an acquisition
5 Mainly due to other equity adjustments of \$90 million
Note 21 includes a description of each reserve.
The notes on pages 85 to 139 form an integral part of these fi nancial statements.
Condensed consolidated interim cash fl ow statement
For the six months ended 30 June 2018
| 6 months ended 30.06.18 \$million |
6 months ended 31.12.17 \$million |
6 months ended 30.06.17 \$million |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash fl ows from operating activities: | |||
| Profi t before taxation | 2,346 | 661 | 1,754 |
| Adjustments for non-cash items and other adjustments included within income statement | 1,183 | 2,207 | 1,034 |
| Change in operating assets | (28,843) | (6,674) | (6,951) |
| Change in operating liabilities | 39,994 | 3,404 | 2,415 |
| Contributions to defi ned benefi t schemes | (38) | (93) | (50) |
| UK and overseas taxes paid | (330) | (456) | (459) |
| Net cash from/(used in) operating activities | 14,312 | (951) | (2,257) |
| Cash fl ows from investing activities: | |||
| Purchase of property, plant and equipment | (64) | (108) | (57) |
| Disposal of property, plant and equipment | 3 | 2 | 27 |
| Acquisition of investment in subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures, net of cash acquired | – | – | (44) |
| Dividends received from subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| Disposal of subsidiaries | – | (24) | 24 |
| Purchase of investment securities | (143,903) | (131,854) | (133,332) |
| Disposal and maturity of investment securities | 134,847 | 126,269 | 135,047 |
| Net cash (used in)/from investing activities | (9,114) | (5,714) | 1,666 |
| Cash fl ows from fi nancing activities: | |||
| Issue of ordinary and preference share capital, net of expenses | 4 | 2 | 4 |
| Exercise of share options | 7 | 2 | 8 |
| Issue of Additional Tier 1 capital, net of expenses | – | – | 992 |
| Gross proceeds from issue of subordinated liabilities | 500 | – | – |
| Interest paid on subordinated liabilities | (242) | (486) | (257) |
| Repayment of subordinated liabilities | (2,242) | (2,984) | – |
| Proceeds from issue of senior debts | 1,921 | 2,031 | 261 |
| Repayment of senior debts | (2,464) | (2,977) | (1,185) |
| Interest paid on senior debts | (222) | (548) | (348) |
| (Repayment to)/investment from non-controlling interests | – | (3) | 24 |
| Dividends paid to non-controlling interests and preference shareholders | (243) | (219) | (277) |
| Dividends paid to ordinary shareholders | (348) | – | – |
| Net cash used in fi nancing activities | (3,329) | (5,182) | (778) |
| Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 1,869 | (11,847) | (1,369) |
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period | 87,231 | 98,596 | 96,977 |
| Effect of exchange rate movements on cash and cash equivalents | (785) | 482 | 2,988 |
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period | 88,315 | 87,231 | 98,596 |
Contents – Notes to the fi nancial statements
| Section | Note | Page | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Basis of preparation | 1 | Accounting policies | 85 |
| Performance and return | 2 | Segmental information | 86 |
| 3 | Net fees and commission | 92 | |
| 4 | Net trading income | 94 | |
| 5 | Other operating income | 94 | |
| 6 | Operating expenses | 94 | |
| 7 | Credit impairment | 95 | |
| 8 | Other impairment | 99 | |
| 9 | Taxation | 99 | |
| 10 | Dividends | 100 | |
| 11 | Earnings per ordinary share | 101 | |
| Assets and liabilities held at fair value | 12 | Financial instruments | 101 |
| 13 | Derivative fi nancial instruments | 125 | |
| Financial instruments held at amortised cost | 14 | Reverse repurchase and repurchase agreements including other similar secured lending and borrowing |
126 |
| Other assets and investments | 15 | Goodwill and intangible assets | 128 |
| 16 | Other assets | 128 | |
| Funding, accruals, provisions, contingent | 17 | Other liabilities | 129 |
| liabilities and legal proceedings | 18 | Contingent liabilities and commitments | 130 |
| 19 | Legal and regulatory matters | 130 | |
| Capital instruments, equity and reserves | 20 | Subordinated liabilities and other borrowed funds | 132 |
| 21 | Share capital, other equity and reserves | 132 | |
| Employee benefi ts | 22 | Retirement benefi t obligations | 135 |
| Other disclosure matters | 23 | Related party transactions | 136 |
| 24 | Post balance sheet events | 136 | |
| 25 | Corporate governance | 136 | |
| 26 | Statutory accounts | 136 | |
| 27 | Transition to IFRS 9 Financial Instruments | 137 |
85
Notes to the fi nancial statements
1. Accounting policies
Statement of compliance
The Group's condensed consolidated interim fi nancial statements consolidate those of Standard Chartered PLC (the Company) and its subsidiaries (together referred to as the Group) and equity account the Group's interest in associates and jointly controlled entities. These interim fi nancial statements have been prepared in accordance with the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and with IAS 34 Interim Financial Reporting as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and adopted by the European Union (EU). They should be read in conjunction with the annual consolidated fi nancial statements of the Group for the year ended 31 December 2017, which were prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and IFRS Interpretations Committee (IFRIC) interpretations as issued by the IASB and endorsed by the EU. At 30 June 2018, there was no difference between IFRS endorsed by the EU and the IFRS issued by the IASB in terms of their application to the Group.
The following form part of these interim fi nancial statements:
- a) Risk review: from the start of Credit risk review on (page 26) to the end of the Other principal risks on (page 69), excluding:
- ¼ Credit quality by geographic region (page 37)
- ¼ Credit quality by industry (page 39)
- ¼ Credit impaired (stage 3) loans by geographic region (page 46)
- ¼ Industry and Retail products analysis by geographic region (page 51)
- ¼ Country risk (page 58)
- ¼ Market risk changes risks not in VaR (page 60)
- ¼ Market risk changes backtesting (page 60)
- ¼ Liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) (page 61)
- ¼ Stressed coverage (page 61)
- ¼ Net stable funding ratio (NSFR) (page 62)
- ¼ Liquidity pool (page 62)
- ¼ Encumbrance (page 63)
- ¼ Interest Rate Risk in the Banking Book (page 69)
- ¼ Operational risk (page 69)
- ¼ Other principal risks (page 69)
- b) Capital review: from the start of Capital Requirements Directive (CRD) IV capital base on (page 71) to the end of Movement in total capital on (page 72), excluding capital ratios and risk-weighted assets (RWA)
Accounting policies
The accounting policies applied by the Group in the Interim Financial Information are the same as those applied by the Group in the 2017 annual consolidated fi nancial statements, except that the classifi cation, measurement and impairment of fi nancial instruments are accounted for under IFRS 9 Financial Instruments, and the recognition of revenue from contracts with customers is accounted for under IFRS 15. Both standards are effective from 1 January 2018. The Interim Financial Information has been prepared in accordance with the "Recognition and measurement" requirements of IAS 34.
Signifi cant accounting estimates and judgements
The preparation of interim fi nancial statements requires management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, income and expense. Actual results may differ from these estimates. The signifi cant judgements made by management in applying the Group's accounting policies and key sources of uncertainty were the same as those applied to the consolidated fi nancial statements as at, and for, the year ended 31 December 2017, except for the treatment of fi nancial instruments under IFRS 9 as explained above. Summaries of the Group's signifi cant accounting policies are included throughout the 2017 Annual Report.
IFRS and Hong Kong accounting requirements
As required by the Hong Kong Listing Rules, an explanation of the differences in accounting practices between EU-endorsed IFRS and Hong Kong Financial Reporting Standards is required to be disclosed. There would be no signifi cant differences had these accounts been prepared in accordance with Hong Kong Financial Reporting Standards.
Comparatives
Prior period comparatives are presented on an IAS 39 basis. Certain comparatives have been changed to align with current year disclosures. The main changes are in respect of IFRS 9 (see below) and the Risk review – Daily value at risk (page 59).
New accounting standards adopted by the Group IFRS 9 Financial Instruments
On 1 January 2018, the Group adopted IFRS 9 Financial Instruments. IFRS 9 has been endorsed by the EU, and replaces IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement and introduces new requirements for: the classifi cation and measurement of fi nancial instruments; the recognition and measurement of credit impairment provisions; and provides for a simplifi ed approach to hedge accounting.
The Group has further chosen:
- ¼ To continue to apply IAS 39 hedging requirements rather than those of IFRS 9
- ¼ Not to restate comparative periods on the basis that it is not possible to do so without the use of hindsight
The new IFRS 9 accounting policies are stated in the Risk review, Note 7 Credit impairment and Note 12 Financial instruments.
Information of the transition from IAS 39 to IFRS 9 is stated in Note 27.
The Group's initial estimate of credit impairment provisions on adoption of IFRS 9 was \$6,720 million. Following refi nement of the Group's expected loss models, the estimate of the opening credit impairment provisions has been revised down by \$222 million to \$6,498 million, and the net expected credit loss of \$(1,296) million adjusted against retained earnings has similarly decreased by \$222 million to \$(1,074) million. The relevant IFRS 9 disclosures in the Risk Review and in Note 27 Transition to IFRS 9 Financial Instruments have been re-presented accordingly.
1. Accounting policies continued
IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers
IFRS 15 is effective from 1 January 2018 and has been endorsed by the EU, and replaces IAS 18 Revenue. IFRS 15 is conceptually similar to IAS 18, but includes more granular guidance on how to recognise and measure revenue, and also introduces additional disclosure requirements. The Group performed an assessment of the new standard and concluded that the current treatment of revenue from contracts with customers is consistent with the new principles and there is no transitional impact to retained earnings.
Going concern
These interim fi nancial statements were approved by the Board of directors on 31 July 2018. The directors made an assessment of the Group's ability to continue as a going concern and confi rm they are satisfi ed that the Group has adequate resources to continue in business for a period of at least 12 months from the date of approval of these interim fi nancial statements. For this reason, the Group continues to adopt the going concern basis of accounting for preparing the fi nancial statements.
2. Segmental information
The Group's segmental reporting is in accordance with IFRS 8 Operating Segments and is reported consistently with the internal performance framework and as presented to the Group's Management Team. The four client segments are Corporate & Institutional Banking, Retail Banking, Commercial Banking and Private Banking. The four geographic regions are Greater China & North Asia, ASEAN & South Asia, Africa & Middle East, and Europe & Americas. Activities not directly related to a client segment and/or geographic region are included in Central & other items. These mainly include Corporate Centre costs, Asset and Liability Management, treasury activities, certain strategic investments and the UK bank levy.
The following should also be noted:
- ¼ Transactions and funding between the segments are carried out on an arm's-length basis
- ¼ Corporate Centre costs represent stewardship and central management services roles and activities that are not directly attributable to business or country operations
- ¼ Asset and Liability Management, joint ventures and associate investments are managed in the regions and are included within the applicable region. However, they are not managed directly by a client segment and are therefore included in the Central & other items segment
- ¼ In addition to treasury activities, Corporate Centre costs and other Group related functions, Central & other items for regions includes globally run businesses or activities that are managed by the client segments but not directly by geographic management. These include Principal Finance and Portfolio Management
- ¼ The Group allocated central costs (excluding Corporate Centre costs) relating to client segments and geographic regions using appropriate business drivers (such as in proportion to the direct cost base of each segment before allocation of indirect costs) and these are reported within operating expenses
New accounting standards in issue but not yet effective IFRS 16 Leases
The effective date of IFRS 16 is 1 January 2019 and the standard was endorsed by the EU in November 2017. IFRS 16 introduces a single lessee accounting model and requires a lessee to recognise assets and liabilities for all leases with a term of more than 12 months, unless the underlying asset is of low value. A lessee is required to recognise a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying leased asset and a lease liability representing its obligation to make lease payments. IFRS 16 substantially carries forward the lessor accounting requirements in IAS 17 Leases. Accordingly, a lessor continues to classify its leases as operating leases or fi nance leases, and to account for those two types of leases differently. The work to assess the impact of the standard is ongoing and it is not yet practicable to quantify the effect of IFRS 16 on these consolidated fi nancial statements. The Group will have a balance sheet increase in lease liabilities and right-of-use assets on adoption of IFRS 16.
Basis of preparation
The analysis refl ects how the client segments and geographic regions are managed internally. This is described as the Management View and is principally the location from which a client relationship is managed, which may differ from where it is fi nancially booked and may be shared between businesses and/or regions. In certain instances this approach is not appropriate and a Financial View is disclosed, that is, the location in which the transaction or balance was booked. Typically, the Financial View is used in areas such as the Market and Liquidity Risk reviews where actual booking location is more important for an assessment. Segmental information is therefore on a Management View unless otherwise stated.
Restructuring items excluded from underlying results
Income, costs and impairment relating to identifi able business units, products or portfolios from the date that they have been approved for restructuring, disposal, wind down or redundancy as a consequence of the Strategy Review announced on 3 November 2015 are presented as restructuring and excluded from the underlying results of the Group. This includes realised and unrealised gains and losses from management's decisions to dispose of assets as well as residual income, direct costs and impairment of related legacy assets of those identifi able business units, products or portfolios.
A reconciliation between underlying and statutory results is set out in the table below:
| 6 months ended 30.06.18 | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Underlying \$million |
Restructuring \$million |
Net gain on businesses disposed/ held for sale \$million |
Goodwill impairment \$million |
Gains arising on repurchase of senior and subordinated liabilities \$million |
Statutory \$million |
||||||
| Operating income | 7,649 | (91) | – | – | 69 | 7,627 | |||||
| Operating expenses | (5,117) | (68) | – | – | – | (5,185) | |||||
| Operating profi t/(loss) before impairment losses and taxation |
2,532 | (159) | – | – | 69 | 2,442 | |||||
| Credit impairment | (293) | 79 | – | – | – | (214) | |||||
| Other impairment | (51) | 1 | – | – | – | (50) | |||||
| Profi t from associates and joint ventures | 168 | – | – | – | – | 168 | |||||
| Profi t/(loss) before taxation | 2,356 | (79) | – | – | 69 | 2,346 |
| 6 months ended 31.12.17 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Underlying \$million |
Restructuring \$million |
Net gain on businesses disposed/ held for sale \$million |
Goodwill impairment \$million |
Gains arising on repurchase of senior and subordinated liabilities \$million |
Statutory \$million |
|
| Operating income | 7,067 | 59 | 78 | – | – | 7,204 |
| Operating expenses | (5,351) | (196) | – | – | – | (5,547) |
| Operating profi t/(loss) before impairment losses and taxation |
1,716 | (137) | 78 | – | – | 1,657 |
| Credit impairment | (617) | (90) | – | – | – | (707) |
| Other impairment | (85) | (1) | – | (320) | – | (406) |
| Profi t from associates and joint ventures | 77 | 40 | – | – | – | 117 |
| Profi t/(loss) before taxation | 1,091 | (188) | 78 | (320) | – | 661 |
| 6 months ended 30.06.17 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Underlying \$million |
Restructuring \$million |
Net gain on businesses disposed/ held for sale \$million |
Goodwill impairment \$million |
Gains arising on repurchase of senior and subordinated liabilities \$million |
Statutory \$million |
|
| Operating income | 7,222 | (1) | – | – | – | 7,221 |
| Operating expenses | (4,769) | (101) | – | – | – | (4,870) |
| Operating profi t/(loss) before impairment losses and taxation |
2,453 | (102) | – | – | – | 2,351 |
| Credit impairment | (583) | (72) | – | – | – | (655) |
| Other impairment | (84) | (9) | – | – | – | (93) |
| Profi t from associates and joint ventures | 133 | 18 | – | – | – | 151 |
| Profi t/(loss) before taxation | 1,919 | (165) | – | – | – | 1,754 |
Underlying performance by client segment
| 6 months ended 30.06.18 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate & Institutional Banking \$million |
Retail Banking \$million |
Commercial Banking \$million |
Private Banking \$million |
Central & other items \$million |
Total \$million |
|
| Operating income | 3,451 | 2,620 | 706 | 271 | 601 | 7,649 |
| Operating expenses | (2,218) | (1,884) | (460) | (275) | (280) | (5,117) |
| Operating profi t/(loss) before impairment losses and taxation |
1,233 | 736 | 246 | (4) | 321 | 2,532 |
| Credit impairment | (81) | (119) | (106) | (1) | 14 | (293) |
| Other impairment | (59) | – | – | – | 8 | (51) |
| Profi t from associates and joint ventures | – | – | – | – | 168 | 168 |
| Underlying profi t/(loss) before taxation | 1,093 | 617 | 140 | (5) | 511 | 2,356 |
| Restructuring | (76) | (4) | (1) | (6) | 8 | (79) |
| Gains arising on repurchase of senior and subordinated liabilities |
3 | – | – | – | 66 | 69 |
| Statutory profi t/(loss) before taxation | 1,020 | 613 | 139 | (11) | 585 | 2,346 |
| Total assets | 310,487 | 103,581 | 32,347 | 13,616 | 234,843 | 694,874 |
| Of which: loans and advances to customers | 143,297 | 101,530 | 28,571 | 13,565 | 9,756 | 296,719 |
| Total liabilities | 384,593 | 135,384 | 35,024 | 19,938 | 68,447 | 643,386 |
| Of which: customer accounts | 246,667 | 132,254 | 32,696 | 19,830 | 3,567 | 435,014 |
| 6 months ended 31.12.17 | ||||||
| Corporate & Institutional Banking \$million |
Retail Banking \$million |
Commercial Banking \$million |
Private Banking \$million |
Central & other items \$million |
Total \$million |
|
| Operating income | 3,278 | 2,438 | 673 | 258 | 420 | 7,067 |
| Operating expenses | (2,286) | (1,862) | (454) | (257) | (492) | (5,351) |
| Operating profi t/(loss) before impairment losses and taxation |
992 | 576 | 219 | 1 | (72) | 1,716 |
| Credit impairment | (289) | (203) | (125) | (1) | 1 | (617) |
| Other impairment | (90) | (1) | – | – | 6 | (85) |
| Profi t from associates and joint ventures | – | – | – | – | 77 | 77 |
| Underlying profi t before taxation | 613 | 372 | 94 | – | 12 | 1,091 |
| Restructuring | (99) | (23) | (7) | (14) | (45) | (188) |
| Net gains on businesses disposed/held for sale |
– | – | – | – | 78 | 78 |
| Goodwill impairment | – | – | – | – | (320) | (320) |
| Statutory profi t/(loss) before taxation | 514 | 349 | 87 | (14) | (275) | 661 |
| Total assets | 293,334 | 105,178 | 31,650 | 13,469 | 219,870 | 663,501 |
| Of which: loans and advances to customers | 131,738 | 103,013 | 28,108 | 13,351 | 9,343 | 285,553 |
| Total liabilities | 353,582 | 132,819 | 36,385 | 22,203 | 66,705 | 611,694 |
| Of which: customer accounts | 222,714 | 129,536 | 33,880 | 22,222 | 3,372 | 411,724 |
Underlying performance by client segment continued
| 6 months ended 30.06.17 Corporate & Institutional Retail Commercial Private Central & Banking Banking Banking Banking other items \$million \$million \$million \$million \$million 3,218 2,396 660 242 706 (2,123) (1,723) (427) (243) (253) 1,095 673 233 (1) 453 (369) (172) (42) – – (78) – (3) – (3) – – – – 133 |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total \$million |
||||||||
| Operating income | 7,222 | |||||||
| Operating expenses | (4,769) | |||||||
| Operating profi t/(loss) before impairment losses and taxation |
2,453 | |||||||
| Credit impairment | (583) | |||||||
| Other impairment | (84) | |||||||
| Profi t from associates and joint ventures | 133 | |||||||
| Underlying profi t/(loss) before taxation | 648 | 501 | 188 | (1) | 583 | 1,919 | ||
| Restructuring | (176) | 4 | (6) | (1) | 14 | (165) | ||
| Statutory profi t/(loss) before taxation | 472 | 505 | 182 | (2) | 597 | 1,754 | ||
| Total assets | 284,613 | 101,633 | 30,141 | 12,916 | 228,335 | 657,638 | ||
| Of which: loans and advances to customers | 125,542 | 98,491 | 26,798 | 12,800 | 5,267 | 268,898 | ||
| Total liabilities | 351,367 | 127,461 | 34,651 | 22,073 | 70,724 | 606,276 | ||
| Of which: customer accounts | 217,044 | 123,776 | 32,086 | 21,991 | 3,441 | 398,338 | ||
Underlying performance by region
| 6 months ended 30.06.18 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greater China & North Asia \$million |
ASEAN & South Asia \$million |
Africa & Middle East \$million |
Europe & Americas \$million |
Central & other items \$million |
Total \$million |
|
| Operating income | 3,097 | 2,073 | 1,376 | 870 | 233 | 7,649 |
| Operating expenses | (1,903) | (1,360) | (919) | (736) | (199) | (5,117) |
| Operating profi t before impairment losses and taxation |
1,194 | 713 | 457 | 134 | 34 | 2,532 |
| Credit impairment | (17) | (138) | (70) | (68) | – | (293) |
| Other impairment | (44) | 7 | – | 17 | (31) | (51) |
| Profi t from associates and joint ventures | 156 | 7 | – | 3 | 2 | 168 |
| Underlying profi t before taxation | 1,289 | 589 | 387 | 86 | 5 | 2,356 |
| Restructuring | (26) | 88 | (41) | (5) | (95) | (79) |
| Gains arising on repurchase of senior and subordinated liabilities |
– | – | – | 3 | 66 | 69 |
| Statutory profi t/(loss) before taxation | 1,263 | 677 | 346 | 84 | (24) | 2,346 |
| Net interest margin | 1.5% | 2.0% | 3.1% | 0.4% | 1.6% | |
| Total assets | 268,294 | 147,017 | 58,343 | 208,599 | 12,621 | 694,874 |
| Of which: loans and advances to customers | 132,679 | 82,078 | 30,967 | 50,995 | – | 296,719 |
| Total liabilities | 235,214 | 126,815 | 38,493 | 210,002 | 32,862 | 643,386 |
| Of which: customer accounts | 190,305 | 95,228 | 31,540 | 117,941 | – | 435,014 |
Underlying performance by region continued
| 6 months ended 31.12.17 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greater China & North Asia \$million |
ASEAN & South Asia \$million |
Africa & Middle East \$million |
Europe & Americas \$million |
Central & other items \$million |
Total \$million |
|
| Operating income | 2,825 | 1,869 | 1,377 | 792 | 204 | 7,067 |
| Operating expenses | (1,922) | (1,404) | (932) | (727) | (366) | (5,351) |
| Operating profi t/(loss) before impairment losses and taxation |
903 | 465 | 445 | 65 | (162) | 1,716 |
| Credit impairment | (65) | (338) | (171) | (44) | 1 | (617) |
| Other impairment | (27) | (9) | (1) | (16) | (32) | (85) |
| Profi t/(loss) from associates and joint ventures | 106 | (26) | – | – | (3) | 77 |
| Underlying profi t/(loss) before taxation | 917 | 92 | 273 | 5 | (196) | 1,091 |
| Restructuring | 45 | (114) | (26) | (10) | (83) | (188) |
| Net gains on businesses disposed/held for sale |
– | 19 | – | – | 59 | 78 |
| Goodwill impairment | – | – | – | – | (320) | (320) |
| Statutory profi t/(loss) before taxation | 962 | (3) | 247 | (5) | (540) | 661 |
| Net interest margins | 1.4% | 1.9% | 3.3% | 0.5% | 1.6% | |
| Total assets | 257,692 | 148,467 | 59,166 | 185,345 | 12,831 | 663,501 |
| Of which: loans and advances to customers | 126,739 | 82,579 | 29,602 | 46,633 | – | 285,553 |
| Total liabilities | 228,093 | 128,165 | 39,413 | 177,525 | 38,498 | 611,694 |
| Of which: customer accounts | 186,517 | 95,310 | 31,797 | 98,100 | – | 411,724 |
| 6 months ended 30.06.17 | ||||||
| Greater China & North Asia \$million |
ASEAN & South Asia \$million |
Africa & Middle East \$million |
Europe & Americas \$million |
Central & other items \$million |
Total \$million |
|
| Operating income | 2,791 | 1,964 | 1,387 | 809 | 271 | 7,222 |
| Operating expenses | (1,759) | (1,250) | (887) | (680) | (193) | (4,769) |
| Operating profi t before impairment losses and taxation |
1,032 | 714 | 500 | 129 | 78 | 2,453 |
| Credit impairment | (76) | (315) | (129) | (63) | – | (583) |
| Other impairment | (54) | (3) | (2) | – | (25) | (84) |
| Profi t from associates and joint ventures | 123 | 4 | – | – | 6 | 133 |
| Underlying profi t before taxation | 1,025 | 400 | 369 | 66 | 59 | 1,919 |
| Restructuring | (10) | (47) | (7) | (15) | (86) | (165) |
| Statutory profi t/(loss) before taxation | 1,015 | 353 | 362 | 51 | (27) | 1,754 |
| Net interest margins | 1.3% | 1.9% | 3.4% | 0.5% | 1.6% | |
| Total assets | 249,672 | 149,173 | 56,296 | 191,220 | 11,277 | 657,638 |
Of which: loans and advances to customers 120,458 77,645 29,402 41,393 – 268,898 Total liabilities 214,036 129,710 37,820 181,851 42,859 606,276 Of which: customer accounts 173,866 93,189 30,944 100,339 – 398,338
Additional segmental information (statutory)
| Corporate & Institutional Banking \$million |
Retail Banking \$million |
Commercial Banking \$million |
Private Banking \$million |
Central & other items \$million |
Total \$million |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net interest income | 1,691 | 1,577 | 427 | 147 | 519 | 4,361 |
| Net fees and commission income | 763 | 884 | 151 | 110 | (39) | 1,869 |
| Other income | 904 | 158 | 128 | 16 | 191 | 1,397 |
| Operating income | 3,358 | 2,619 | 706 | 273 | 671 | 7,627 |
| 6 months ended 31.12.17 | ||||||
| Corporate & | ||||||
| Institutional | Retail | Commercial | Private | Central & | ||
| Banking \$million |
Banking \$million |
Banking \$million |
Banking \$million |
other items \$million |
Total \$million |
|
| Net interest income | 1,657 | 1,511 | 416 | 154 | 477 | 4,215 |
| Net fees and commission income | 755 | 836 | 139 | 90 | (41) | 1,779 |
| Other income | 929 | 118 | 116 | 14 | 33 | 1,210 |
| Operating income | 3,341 | 2,465 | 671 | 258 | 469 | 7,204 |
| 6 months ended 30.06.17 | ||||||
| Corporate & | ||||||
| Institutional Banking |
Retail Banking |
Commercial Banking |
Private Banking |
Central & other items |
Total | |
| \$million | \$million | \$million | \$million | \$million | \$million | |
| Net interest income | 1,568 | 1,495 | 386 | 132 | 385 | 3,966 |
| Net fees and commission income | 716 | 790 | 146 | 92 | (11) | 1,733 |
| Other income | 898 | 153 | 126 | 18 | 327 | 1,522 |
| Operating income | 3,182 | 2,438 | 658 | 242 | 701 | 7,221 |
| 6 months ended 30.06.18 | ||||||
| Greater China & North Asia \$million |
ASEAN & South Asia \$million |
Africa & Middle East \$million |
Europe & Americas \$million |
Central & other items \$million |
Total \$million |
|
| Net interest income | 1,677 | 1,275 | 767 | 311 | 331 | 4,361 |
| Other income | 1,418 | 811 | 610 | 562 | (135) | 3,266 |
| Operating income | 3,095 | 2,086 | 1,377 | 873 | 196 | 7,627 |
| 6 months ended 31.12.17 | ||||||
| Greater China & | ASEAN & | Africa & | Europe & | Central & | ||
| North Asia \$million |
South Asia \$million |
Middle East \$million |
Americas \$million |
other items \$million |
Total \$million |
|
| Net interest income | 1,555 | 1,246 | 811 | 376 | 227 | 4,215 |
| Other income | 1,268 | 640 | 567 | 414 | 100 | 2,989 |
| Operating income | 2,823 | 1,886 | 1,378 | 790 | 327 | 7,204 |
| 6 months ended 30.06.17 | ||||||
| Greater China & | ASEAN & | Africa & | Europe & | Central & | ||
| North Asia | South Asia | Middle East | Americas | other items | Total | |
| \$million | \$million | \$million | \$million | \$million | \$million | |
| Net interest income | 1,395 | 1,156 | 808 | 316 | 291 | 3,966 |
| Other income | 1,395 | 828 | 578 | 490 | (36) | 3,255 |
| Operating income | 2,790 | 1,984 | 1,386 | 806 | 255 | 7,221 |
6 months ended 30.06.18
Additional segmental information (statutory) continued
| 6 months ended 30.06.18 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hong Kong \$million |
Korea \$million |
China \$million |
Singapore \$million |
India \$million |
UAE \$million |
UK \$million |
US \$million |
|
| Net interest income | 903 | 341 | 337 | 531 | 310 | 182 | 137 | 120 |
| Other income | 945 | 193 | 83 | 319 | 165 | 175 | 307 | 213 |
| Operating income | 1,848 | 534 | 420 | 850 | 475 | 357 | 444 | 333 |
| 6 months ended 31.12.17 | ||||||||
| Hong Kong \$million |
Korea \$million |
China \$million |
Singapore \$million |
India \$million |
UAE \$million |
UK \$million |
US \$million |
|
| Net interest income | 831 | 315 | 295 | 535 | 283 | 194 | 248 | 93 |
| Other income | 886 | 147 | 69 | 167 | 153 | 162 | 96 | 240 |
| Operating income | 1,717 | 462 | 364 | 702 | 436 | 356 | 344 | 333 |
| 6 months ended 30.06.17 | ||||||||
| Hong Kong \$million |
Korea \$million |
China \$million |
Singapore \$million |
India \$million |
UAE \$million |
UK \$million |
US \$million |
|
| Net interest income | 733 | 310 | 245 | 430 | 294 | 200 | 180 | 65 |
| Other income | 937 | 193 | 94 | 303 | 253 | 177 | 218 | 277 |
| Operating income | 1,670 | 503 | 339 | 733 | 547 | 377 | 398 | 342 |
3. Net fees and commission
| 6 months ended | 6 months ended | 6 months ended | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30.06.18 | 31.12.17 | 30.06.17 | |
| \$million | \$million | \$million | |
| Fees and commissions income | 2,114 | 1,961 | 1,981 |
| Fees and commissions expense | (245) | (182) | (248) |
| Net fees and commission | 1,869 | 1,779 | 1,733 |
Total fee income arising from fi nancial instruments that are not fair valued through profi t or loss is \$699 million (31 December 2017: \$538 million and 30 June 2017: \$529 million) and arising from trust and other fi duciary activities of \$78 million (31 December 2017: \$63 million and 30 June 2017: \$67 million).
Total fee expense arising from fi nancial instruments that are not fair valued through profi t or loss is \$55 million (31 December 2017: \$41 million and 30 June 2017: \$33 million) and arising from trust and other fi duciary activities of \$14 million (31 December 2017: \$11 million and 30 June 2017: \$11 million).
3. Net fees and commission continued
| 6 months ended 30.06.18 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate & Institutional Banking \$million |
Retail Banking \$million |
Commercial Banking \$million |
Private Banking \$million |
Central & other items \$million |
Total \$million |
|
| 555 | 6 | 118 | – | – | 679 | |
| 236 | 6 | 86 | – | – | 328 | |
| 319 | – | 32 | – | – | 351 | |
| 101 | – | 13 | – | – | 114 | |
| 78 | – | 11 | – | – | 89 | |
| 23 | – | 8 | – | – | 31 | |
| 6 | – | – | – | – | 6 | |
| – | 652 | 1 | 109 | – | 762 | |
| – | 229 | – | 1 | – | 230 | |
| – | – | – | – | (12) | (12) | |
| – | (3) | – | – | (27) | (30) | |
| 763 | 884 | 151 | 110 | (39) | 1,869 | |
1 Others include GSAM
| 6 months ended 31.12.17 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate & Institutional Banking \$million |
Retail Banking \$million |
Commercial Banking \$million |
Private Banking \$million |
Central & other items \$million |
Total \$million |
|
| Transaction Banking | 534 | 6 | 110 | – | – | 650 |
| Trade | 233 | 6 | 79 | – | – | 318 |
| Cash Management and Custody | 301 | – | 31 | – | – | 332 |
| Financial Markets | 185 | – | 24 | – | – | 209 |
| Corporate Finance | (43) | – | (4) | – | – | (47) |
| Lending and Portfolio Management | 70 | – | 7 | – | – | 77 |
| Principal Finance | 9 | – | – | – | – | 9 |
| Wealth Management | – | 606 | 2 | 89 | – | 697 |
| Retail Products | – | 222 | – | 1 | – | 223 |
| Treasury | – | – | – | – | (12) | (12) |
| Others | – | 2 | – | – | (29) | (27) |
| Net fees and commission | 755 | 836 | 139 | 90 | (41) | 1,779 |
| 6 months ended 30.06.17 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate & Institutional Banking \$million |
Retail Banking \$million |
Commercial Banking \$million |
Private Banking \$million |
Central & other items \$million |
Total \$million |
|
| Transaction Banking | 510 | 6 | 111 | – | – | 627 |
| Trade | 217 | 6 | 81 | – | – | 304 |
| Cash Management and Custody | 293 | – | 30 | – | – | 323 |
| Financial Markets | (18) | – | 2 | – | – | (16) |
| Corporate Finance | 250 | – | 23 | – | – | 273 |
| Lending and Portfolio Management | (34) | – | 8 | – | – | (26) |
| Principal Finance | 8 | – | – | – | – | 8 |
| Wealth Management | – | 565 | 2 | 91 | – | 658 |
| Retail Products | – | 219 | – | 1 | – | 220 |
| Treasury | – | – | – | – | (8) | (8) |
| Others | – | – | – | – | (3) | (3) |
| Net fees and commission | 716 | 790 | 146 | 92 | (11) | 1,733 |
4. Net trading income
| 6 months ended 30.06.18 \$million |
6 months ended 31.12.17 \$million |
6 months ended 30.06.17 \$million |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Net trading income | 966 | 554 | 973 |
| Signifi cant items within net trading income include: | |||
| Gains on instruments held for trading | 944 | 636 | 1,080 |
| Losses on fi nancial assets mandatorily at fair value through profi t or loss | (77) | – | – |
| (Losses)/gains on fi nancial assets designated at fair value through profi t or loss | (13) | 126 | 41 |
| Gains/(losses) on fi nancial liabilities designated at fair value through profi t or loss | 165 | (33) | (169) |
5. Other operating income
| 6 months ended 30.06.18 \$million |
6 months ended 31.12.17 \$million |
6 months ended 30.06.17 \$million |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Other operating income includes: | |||
| Rental income from operating lease assets | 288 | 384 | 286 |
| Gains less losses on disposal of available-for-sale fi nancial instruments | (13) | 134 | 101 |
| Net gain on sale of businesses | – | 14 | 14 |
| Net gain on derecognition of investment in associate | – | 64 | – |
| Dividend income | 9 | 8 | 38 |
| Gains arising on repurchase of senior and subordinated liabilities1 | 69 | – | – |
| Other | 78 | 52 | 110 |
| 431 | 656 | 549 |
1 On the 14 June 2018, Standard Chartered PLC repurchased in part, £245.7 million of its £750 million 4.375 per cent senior debt 2038 and £372.5 million of its £900 million 5.125 per cent subordinated debt 2034. On the same date, Standard Chartered Bank repurchased in part, £95.1 million of its £200 million 7.75 per cent subordinated notes (callable 2022). This activity resulted in an overall gain of £69 million for the Group. Please refer to note 20
6. Operating expenses
| 6 months ended 30.06.18 |
6 months ended 31.12.2017 |
6 months ended 31.06.2017 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Staff costs: | \$million | \$million | \$million |
| Wages and salaries | 2,745 | 2,570 | 2,477 |
| Social security costs | 96 | 76 | 83 |
| Other pension costs (note 22) | 187 | 201 | 156 |
| Share-based payment costs | 104 | 72 | 80 |
| Other staff costs | 446 | 576 | 467 |
| 3,578 | 3,495 | 3,263 | |
| Premises and equipment expenses: | |||
| Rental of premises | 186 | 190 | 189 |
| Other premises and equipment costs | 177 | 239 | 188 |
| Rental of computers and equipment | 10 | 8 | 9 |
| 373 | 437 | 386 | |
| General administrative expenses: | |||
| UK bank levy | – | 220 | – |
| Other general administrative expenses | 808 | 951 | 836 |
| 808 | 1,171 | 836 |
6. Operating expenses continued
| 6 months ended 30.06.18 \$million |
6 months ended 31.12.2017 \$million |
6 months ended 30.06.2017 \$million |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Depreciation and amortisation: | |||
| Property, plant and equipment: | |||
| Premises | 44 | 44 | 41 |
| Equipment | 47 | 45 | 40 |
| Operating lease assets | 148 | 170 | 158 |
| 239 | 259 | 239 | |
| Intangibles: | |||
| Software | 182 | 180 | 140 |
| Acquired on business combinations | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| 426 | 444 | 385 |
The UK bank levy is applied on the chargeable equities and liabilities on the Group's consolidated balance sheet excluding Tier 1 capital, insured or guaranteed retail deposits, repo secured on certain sovereign debt and liabilities subject to netting. The rate of the levy for 2018 is the blended rate of 0.16 per cent (31 December 2017: 0.17 per cent ) for chargeable short-term liabilities, with a lower rate of 0.08 per cent (31 December 2017: 0.085 per cent) applied to chargeable equity and long-term liabilities.
7. Credit impairment
Accounting policy
Signifi cant accounting estimates and judgements
The Group's expected credit loss (ECL) calculations are outputs of complex models with a number of underlying assumptions. The signifi cant judgements and estimates in determining expected credit loss include:
- ¼ The Group's criteria for assessing if there has been a signifi cant increase in credit risk; and
- ¼ Development of expected credit loss models, including the choice of inputs relating to macroeconomic variables.
The calculation of credit-impairment provisions also involves expert credit judgement to be applied by the credit risk management team based upon counterparty information they receive from various sources including relationship managers and on external market information.
Expected credit losses
Expected credit losses are determined for all fi nancial debt instruments that are classifi ed at amortised cost or fair value through other comprehensive income, undrawn commitments and fi nancial guarantees.
An expected credit loss represents the present value of expected cash shortfalls over the residual term of a fi nancial asset, undrawn commitment or fi nancial guarantee.
A cash shortfall is the difference between the cash fl ows that are due in accordance with the contractual terms of the instrument and the cash fl ows that the Group expects to receive over the contractual life of the instrument.
Measurement
Expected credit losses are computed as unbiased, probability weighted amounts which are determined by evaluating a range of reasonably possible outcomes, the time value of money, and considering all reasonable and supportable information including that which is forward looking.
For material portfolios, the estimate of expected cash shortfalls is determined by multiplying the probability of default (PD) with the loss given default (LGD) with the expected exposure at the time of default (EAD). There may be multiple default events over the lifetime of an instrument. Further details on the components of PD, LGD and EAD are disclosed in the Credit risk section (page 53). For less material Retail Banking loan portfolios, the Group has adopted simplifi ed approaches based on historical roll rates or loss rates.
Forward-looking economic assumptions are incorporated into the PD, LGD and EAD where relevant and where they infl uence credit risk, such as GDP growth rates, interest rates, house price indices and commodity prices among others. These assumptions are incorporated using the Group's most likely forecast for a range of macroeconomic assumptions. These forecasts are determined using all reasonable and supportable information, which includes both internally developed forecasts and those available externally, and are consistent with those used for budgeting, forecasting and capital planning.
To account for the potential non-linearity in credit losses, multiple forward-looking scenarios are incorporated into the range of reasonably possible outcomes for all material portfolios. For example, where there is a greater risk of downside credit losses than upside gains, multiple forward-looking economic scenarios are incorporated into the range of reasonably possible outcomes, both in respect of determining the PD (and where relevant, the LGD and EAD) and in determining the overall expected credit loss amounts. These scenarios are determined using a Monte Carlo approach centred around the Group's most likely forecast of macroeconomic assumptions.
The period over which cash shortfalls are determined is generally limited to the maximum contractual period for which the Group is exposed to credit risk. However, for certain revolving credit facilities, which include credit cards or overdrafts, the Group's exposure to credit risk is not limited to the contractual period. For these instruments, the Group estimates an appropriate life based on the period that the Group is exposed to credit risk, which includes the effect of credit risk management actions such as the withdrawal of undrawn facilities.
7. Credit impairment continued
For credit-impaired fi nancial instruments, the estimate of cash shortfalls may require the use of expert credit judgement. As a practical expedient, the Group may also measure credit impairment on the basis of an instrument's fair value using an observable market price.
The estimate of expected cash shortfalls on a collateralised fi nancial instrument refl ects the amount and timing of cash fl ows that are expected from foreclosure on the collateral less the costs of obtaining and selling the collateral, regardless of whether foreclosure is deemed probable.
Cash fl ows from unfunded credit enhancements held are included within the measurement of expected credit losses if they are part of, or integral to, the contractual terms of the instrument (this includes fi nancial guarantees, unfunded risk participations and other non-derivative credit insurance). Although non-integral credit enhancements do not impact the measurement of expected credit losses, a reimbursement asset is recognised to the extent of the expected credit losses recorded.
Cash shortfalls are discounted using the effective interest rate (or credit-adjusted effective interest rate for POCI instruments) on the fi nancial instrument as calculated at initial recognition or if the instrument has a variable interest rate, the current effective interest rate determined under the contract.
| Instruments | Location of expected credit loss provisions |
|---|---|
| Financial assets held at amortised cost | Loss provisions: netted against gross carrying value1 |
| Financial assets held at FVOCI – Debt instruments | Other comprehensive income (FVOCI expected credit loss Reserve)2 |
| Loan commitments | Provisions for liabilities and charges3 |
| Financial guarantees | Provisions for liabilities and charges3 |
1 Purchased or originated credit impaired assets do not attract an expected credit loss provision on initial recognition. An expected credit loss provision will be recognised only if there is an increase in expected credit losses from that considered at initial recognition
- 2 Debt and treasury securities classifi ed as FVOCI are held at fair value on the face of the balance sheet. The expected credit loss attributed to these instruments is held as a separate reserve within OCI and is recycled to the profi t and loss account along with any fair value measurement gains or losses held within FVOCI when the applicable instruments are derecognised
- 3 Expected credit loss on loan commitments and fi nancial guarantees is recognised as a liability provision. Where a fi nancial instrument includes both a loan (i.e. fi nancial asset component) and an undrawn commitment (i.e. loan commitment component), and it is not possible to separately identify the expected credit loss on these components, expected credit loss amounts on the loan commitment are recognised together with expected credit loss amounts on the fi nancial asset. To the extent the combined expected credit loss exceeds the gross carrying amount of the fi nancial asset, the expected credit lossis recognised as a liability provision
Recognition
12 months expected credit losses (Stage 1)
Expected credit losses are recognised at the time of initial recognition of a fi nancial instrument and represent the lifetime cash shortfalls arising from possible default events up to 12 months into the future from the balance sheet date. Expected credit losses continue to be determined on this basis until there is either a signifi cant increase in the credit risk of an instrument or the instrument becomes creditimpaired. If an instrument is no longer considered to exhibit a signifi cant increase in credit risk, expected credit losses will revert to being determined on a 12-month basis.
Signifi cant increase in credit risk (Stage 2)
If a fi nancial asset experiences a signifi cant increase in credit risk (SICR) since initial recognition, an expected credit loss provision is recognised for default events that may occur over the lifetime of the asset.
Signifi cant increase in credit risk is assessed by comparing the risk of default of an exposure at the reporting date to the risk of default at origination (after taking into account the passage of time). Signifi cant does not mean statistically signifi cant nor is it assessed in the context of changes in expected credit loss. Whether a change in the risk of default is signifi cant or not is assessed using a number of quantitative and qualitative factors, the weight of which depends on the type of product and counterparty. Financial assets that are 30 or more days past due and not credit-impaired will always be considered to have experienced a signifi cant increase in credit risk. For less material portfolios where a loss rate or roll rate approach is applied to compute expected credit loss, signifi cant increase in credit risk is primarily based on 30 days past due.
Quantitative factors include an assessment of whether there has been signifi cant increase in the forward-looking probability of default (PD) since origination. A forward-looking PD is one that is adjusted for future economic conditions to the extent these are correlated to changes in credit risk. We compare the residual lifetime PD at the balance sheet date to the residual lifetime PD that was expected at the time of origination for the same point in the term structure and determine whether both the absolute and relative change between the two exceeds predetermined thresholds. To the extent that the differences between the measures of default outlined exceed the defi ned thresholds, the instrument is considered to have experienced a signifi cant increase in credit risk.
Qualitative factors assessed include those linked to current credit risk management processes, such as lending placed on non-purely precautionary early alert (and subject to closer monitoring).
A non-purely precautionary early alert account is one which exhibits risk or potential weaknesses of a material nature requiring closer monitoring, supervision, or attention by management. Weaknesses in such a borrower's account, if left uncorrected, could result in deterioration of repayment prospects and the likelihood of being downgraded. Indicators could include a rapid erosion of position within the industry, concerns over management's ability to manage operations, weak/deteriorating operating results, liquidity strain and overdue balances among other factors.
7. Credit impairment continued
Credit impaired (or defaulted) exposures (Stage 3)
Financial assets that are credit impaired (or in default) represent those that are at least 90 days past due in respect of principal and/or interest. Financial assets are also considered to be credit impaired where the obligors are unlikely to pay on the occurrence of one or more observable events that have a detrimental impact on the estimated future cash fl ows of the fi nancial asset. It may not be possible to identify a single discrete event but instead the combined effect of several events may cause fi nancial assets to become credit impaired.
Evidence that a fi nancial asset is credit impaired includes observable data about the following events:
- ¼ Signifi cant fi nancial diffi culty of the issuer or borrower;
- ¼ Breach of contract such as default or a past due event;
- ¼ For economic or contractual reasons relating to the borrower's fi nancial diffi culty, the lenders of the borrower have granted the borrower concession/s that lenders would not otherwise consider. This would include forbearance actions (page 44);
- ¼ Pending or actual bankruptcy or other fi nancial reorganisation to avoid or delay discharge of the borrower's obligation/s;
- ¼ The disappearance of an active market for the applicable fi nancial asset due to fi nancial diffi culties of the borrower; and
- ¼ Purchase or origination of a fi nancial asset at a deep discount that refl ects incurred credit losses.
Irrevocable lending commitments to a credit impaired obligor that have not yet been drawn down are also included within the stage 3 credit impairment provision to the extent that the commitment cannot be withdrawn.
Loss provisions against credit impaired fi nancial assets are determined based on an assessment of the recoverable cash fl ows under a range of scenarios, including the realisation of any collateral held where appropriate. The loss provisions held represent the difference between the present value of the cash fl ows expected to be recovered, discounted at the instrument's original effective interest rate, and the gross carrying value of the instrument prior to any credit impairment. The Group's defi nition of default is aligned with the regulatory defi nition of default as set out in European Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR178) and related guidelines.
Expert credit judgement
For Corporate & Institutional, Commercial and Private Banking, borrowers are graded by credit risk management on a credit grading (CG) scale from CG1 to CG14. Once a borrower starts to exhibit credit deterioration, it will move along the credit grading scale in the performing book and when it is classifi ed as CG12 the credit assessment and oversight of the loan will normally be performed by Group Special Assets Management (GSAM).
Borrowers graded CG12 exhibit well-defi ned weaknesses in areas such as management and/or performance but there is no current expectation of a loss of principal or interest. Where the impairment assessment indicates that there will be a loss of principal on a loan, the borrower is graded a CG14 while borrowers of other credit impaired loans are graded CG13. Instruments graded CG13 or CG14 are regarded as non-performing loans, i.e. Stage 3 or credit impaired exposures.
For individually signifi cant fi nancial assets within Stage 3, Group Special Asset Management (GSAM) will consider all judgements that have an impact on the expected future cash fl ows of the asset. These include: the business prospects, industry and geo-political climate of the customer, quality of realisable value of collateral, the Group's legal position relative to other claimants and any renegotiation/ forbearance/ modifi cation options. The difference between the loan carrying amount and the discounted expected future cash fl ows will result in the stage 3 credit impairment amount. The future cash fl ow calculation involves signifi cant judgements and estimates. As new information becomes available and further negotiations/forbearance measures are taken the estimates of the future cash fl ows will be revised, and will have an impact on the future cash fl ow analysis.
For fi nancial assets which are not individually signifi cant, such as the Retail Banking portfolio or small business loans, which comprise a large number of homogenous loans that share similar characteristics, statistical estimates and techniques are used, as well as credit scoring analysis.
Retail Banking clients are considered credit impaired where they are more 90 days past due. Retail Banking products are also considered credit impaired if the borrower fi les for bankruptcy or other forbearance programme, the borrower is deceased or the business is closed in the case of a small business, or if the borrower surrenders the collateral, or there is an identifi ed fraud on the account. Additionally, if the account is unsecured and the borrower has other credit accounts with the Group that are considered credit impaired, the account may be also be credit impaired.
Techniques used to compute impairment amounts use models which analyse historical repayment and default rates over a time horizon. Where various models are used, judgement is required to analyse the available information provided and select the appropriate model or combination of models to use.
Expert credit judgement is also applied to determine whether any post-model adjustments are required for credit risk elements which are not captured by the models.
Modifi ed fi nancial instruments
Where the original contractual terms of a fi nancial asset have been modifi ed for credit reasons and the instrument has not been derecognised, the resulting modifi cation loss is recognised within credit impairment in the income statement within a corresponding decrease in the gross carrying value of the asset. If the modifi cation involved a concession that the bank would not otherwise consider, the instrument is considered to be credit impaired and is considered forborne.
Expected credit loss for modifi ed fi nancial assets that have not been derecognised and are not considered to be credit-impaired will be recognised on a 12-month basis, or a lifetime basis, if there is a signifi cant increase in credit risk. These assets are assessed to determine whether there has been a signifi cant increase in credit risk subsequent to the modifi cation. Although loans may be modifi ed for non-credit reasons, a signifi cant increase in credit risk may occur.
In addition to the recognition of modifi cation gains and losses, the revised carrying value of modifi ed fi nancial assets will impact the calculation of expected credit losses, with any increase or decrease in expected credit loss recognised within impairment.
7. Credit impairment continued
Forborne loans
Forborne loans are those loans that have been modifi ed in response to a customer's fi nancial diffi culties.
Forbearance strategies assist clients who are temporarily in fi nancial distress and are unable to meet their original contractual repayment terms. Forbearance can be initiated by the client, the Group or a third party including government sponsored programmes or a conglomerate of credit institutions. Forbearance may include debt restructuring such as new repayment schedules, payment deferrals, tenor extensions, interest only payments, lower interest rates, forgiveness of principal, interest or fees, or relaxation of loan covenants.
Forborne loans that have been modifi ed (and not derecognised) on terms that are not consistent with those readily available in the market and/or where we have granted a concession compared to the original terms of the loans are considered credit impaired if there is a detrimental impact on cash fl ows. The modifi cation loss (see Classifi cation and measurement – Modifi cations) is recognised in the profi t or loss within credit impairment and the gross carrying value of the loan reduced by the same amount. The modifi ed loan is disclosed as 'Loans subject to forbearance – credit impaired'.
Loans that have been subject to a forbearance modifi cation, but which are not considered credit impaired (not classifi ed as CG13 or CG14), are disclosed as 'Forborne – not credit impaired'. This may include amendments to covenants within the contractual terms.
Write-offs of credit impaired instruments and reversal of impairment
To the extent a fi nancial debt instrument is considered irrecoverable, the applicable portion of the gross carrying value is written off against the related loan provision. Such loans are written off after all the necessary procedures have been completed, it is decided that there is no realistic probability of recovery and the amount of the loss has been determined. Subsequent recoveries of amounts previously written off decrease the amount of the provision for loan impairment in the income statement. If, in a subsequent period, the amount of the credit impairment loss decreases and the decrease can be related objectively to an event occurring after the credit impairment was recognised (such as an improvement in the debtor's credit rating), the previously recognised credit impairment loss is reversed by adjusting the provision account. The amount of the reversal is recognised in the income statement.
Loss provisions on purchased or originated credit impaired instruments (POCI)
The Group measures expected credit loss on a lifetime basis for POCI instruments throughout the life of the instrument. However, expected credit loss is not recognised in a separate loss provision on initial recognition for POCI instruments as the lifetime expected credit loss is inherent within the gross carrying amount of the instruments. The Group recognises the change in lifetime expected credit losses arising subsequent to initial recognition in the income statement and the cumulative change as a loss provision. Where lifetime expected credit losses on POCI instruments are less than those at initial recognition, then the favourable differences are recognised as impairment gains in the income statement (and as impairment loss where the expected credit losses are greater).
Improvement in credit risk/curing
A period may elapse from the point at which instruments enter lifetime expected credit losses (stage 2 or stage 3) and are reclassifi ed back to 12 month expected credit losses (stage 1). For fi nancial assets that are credit-impaired (stage 3), a transfer to stage 2 or stage 1 is only permitted where the instrument is no longer considered to be credit-impaired. An instrument will no longer be considered credit-impaired when there is no shortfall of cash fl ows compared to the original contractual terms.
For fi nancial assets within stage 2, these can only be transferred to stage 1 when they are no longer considered to have experienced a signifi cant increase in credit risk.
Where signifi cant increase in credit risk was determined using quantitative measures, the instruments will automatically transfer back to stage 1 when the original PD based transfer criteria are no longer met. Where instruments were transferred to stage 2 due to an assessment of qualitative factors, the issues that led to the reclassifi cation must be cured before the instruments can be reclassifi ed to stage 1. This includes instances where management actions led to instruments being classifi ed as stage 2, requiring that action to be resolved before loans are reclassifi ed to stage 1.
A forborne loan can only be removed from the disclosure (cured) if the loan is performing (stage 1 or 2) and a further two year probation period is met.
In order for a forborne loan to become performing, the following criteria have to be satisfi ed:
- ¼ At least a year has passed with no default based upon the forborne contract terms
- ¼ The customer is likely to repay its obligations in full without realising security
- ¼ The customer has no accumulated impairment against amount outstanding
Subsequent to the criteria above, a further two year probation period has to be fulfi lled, whereby regular payments are made by the customer and none of the exposures to the customer are more than 30 days past due.
The following table reconciles the charge for impairment provisions on loans and advances to the total impairment charge and other credit risk provision:
| 6 months ended 30.06.18 \$million |
6 months ended 31.12.17 \$million |
6 months ended 30.06.17 \$million |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Net credit impairment against profi t on loans and advances to banks and customers | 194 | 684 | 681 |
| Net credit impairment against profi t or loss during the period relating to debt securities | (4) | 20 | – |
| Net credit impairment relating to fi nancial guarantees and loan commitments | 24 | 3 | (26) |
| Credit impairment1 | 214 | 707 | 655 |
1 No material POCI assets
8. Other impairment
| 6 months ended 30.06.18 \$million |
6 months ended 31.12.17 \$million |
6 months ended 30.06.17 \$million |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Impairment of goodwill (note 15) | – | 320 | – |
| Other impairment | |||
| Impairment of fi xed assets | 47 | 66 | 71 |
| Impairment losses on fair value through other comprehensive income/available-for-sale fi nancial assets: |
|||
| Equity shares | – | 1 | 15 |
| Impairment of other intangible assets | 21 | 21 | 2 |
| Other | (18) | (2) | 5 |
| 50 | 86 | 93 | |
| 50 | 406 | 93 |
9. Taxation
The following table provides analysis of taxation charge in the period:
| 6 months ended 30.06.18 \$million |
6 months ended 31.12.17 \$million |
6 months ended 30.06.17 \$million |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| The charge for taxation based upon the profi t for the period comprises: | |||
| Current tax: | |||
| United Kingdom corporation tax at 19 per cent (31 December 2017 and 30 June 2017: 19.25 per cent): |
|||
| Current tax charge on income for the period | 3 | – | – |
| Adjustments in respect of prior periods (including double tax relief) | 46 | – | 1 |
| Foreign tax: | |||
| Current tax charge on income for the period | 718 | 370 | 607 |
| Adjustments in respect of prior periods | (88) | (27) | 14 |
| 679 | 343 | 622 | |
| Deferred tax: | |||
| Origination/reversal of temporary differences | (20) | 229 | (73) |
| Adjustments in respect of prior periods | 94 | 27 | (1) |
| 74 | 256 | (74) | |
| Tax on profi ts on ordinary activities | 753 | 599 | 548 |
| Effective tax rate | 32.1% | nm1 | 31.2% |
| Tax on profi ts on ordinary activities excluding the impact of US Tax Reform | 753 | 379 | 548 |
| Effective tax rate excluding the impact of US Tax Reform | 32.1% | nm1 | 31.2% |
1 Not meaningful
The US Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, effective from 1 January 2018, reduced the US corporate tax rate from 35 per cent to 21 per cent and introduced a Base Erosion and Anti Abuse Tax. The combined impact of these changes in tax rates reduced the US deferred tax asset, increasing the deferred taxation charge for the period ended 31 December 2017 by \$220 million.
The tax charge for the period of \$753 million (31 December 2017: \$599 million and 30 June 2017: \$548 million) on a profi t before tax of \$2,346 million (31 December 2017: \$661 million and 30 June 2017: \$1,754 million) refl ects the impact of non-deductible expenses and the impact of countries with tax rates higher or lower than the UK, the most signifi cant of which is India.
Foreign tax includes current tax on Hong Kong profi ts of \$103 million (31 December 2017: \$87 million and 30 June 2017: \$80 million) on the profi ts assessable in Hong Kong.
Deferred tax includes origination or reversal of temporary differences in Hong Kong profi ts of \$(3) million (31 December 2017: \$6 million and 30 June 2017: \$(1) million) provided at a rate of 16.5 per cent (31 December 2017: 16.5 per cent and 30 June 2017: 16.5 per cent) on the profi ts assessable to Hong Kong.
10. Dividends
The Board considers a number of factors which include the rate of recovery in the Group's fi nancial performance, the macroeconomic environment, and opportunities to further invest in our business and grow profi tably in our markets.
Ordinary equity shares
| 30.06.18 | 31.12.17 | 30.06.17 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cents per share | \$million | Cents per share | \$million | Cents per share | \$million | |
| 2017/2016 fi nal dividend declared | ||||||
| and paid during the year1 | 11.00 | 363 | – | – | – | – |
1 The amounts are gross of scrip adjustments
Preference shares and Additional Tier 1 securities
Dividends on these preference shares and securities classifi ed as equity are recorded in the period in which they are declared.
| 30.06.18 \$million |
31.12.17 \$million |
30.06.17 \$million |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-cumulative redeemable preference shares: | 7.014 per cent preference shares of \$5 each | 26 | 26 | 27 |
| 6.409 per cent preference shares of \$5 each | 12 | 15 | 24 | |
| 38 | 41 | 51 | ||
| Additional Tier 1 securities: \$5 billion fi xed rate resetting perpetual subordinated contingent convertible securities |
179 | 179 | 174 | |
| 217 | 220 | 225 | ||
| Dividends on these preference shares are treated as interest expense and accrued accordingly. | ||||
| Non-cumulative irredeemable preference shares: | 7 3/8 per cent preference shares of £1 each | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| 8 1/4 per cent preference shares of £1 each | 5 | 6 | 5 | |
| 10 | 11 | 10 |
Dividends
The 2017 fi nal dividend of 11 cents per ordinary share \$363 million was paid to eligible shareholders on 17 May 2018, and is recognised in these interim accounts.
Interim dividends on ordinary equity shares are recorded in the period in which they are declared and, in respect of the fi nal dividend, have been approved by the shareholders.
Accordingly, the fi nal ordinary equity share dividends as stated above relate to the prior year. No interim dividend was declared in 2017.
2018 recommended interim dividend
The 2018 interim dividend of 6 cents per share (\$198 million) will be paid in pounds sterling, Hong Kong dollars or US dollars on 22 October 2018 to shareholders on the UK register of members at the close of business in the UK on 10 August 2018. The 2018 interim dividend will be paid in Indian rupees on 22 October 2018 to Indian Depository Receipt holders on the Indian register at the close of business in India on 10 August 2018.
It is intended that shareholders on the UK register and Hong Kong branch register will be able to elect to receive shares credited as fully paid instead of all or part of the interim cash dividend. Details of the dividend arrangements will be sent to shareholders on or around 31 August 2018. Indian Depository Receipt holders will receive their dividend in Indian rupees only.
11. Earnings per ordinary share
The table below provides the basis of underlying earnings.
| 6 months ended 30.06.18 |
6 months ended 31.12.17 |
6 months ended 30.06.17 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| \$million | \$million | \$million | |
| Profi t for the period attributable to equity holders | 1,593 | 62 | 1,206 |
| Non-controlling interest | (33) | (39) | (10) |
| Dividend payable on preference shares and AT1 classifi ed as equity | (217) | (220) | (225) |
| Profi t/(loss) for the period attributable to ordinary shareholders | 1,343 | (197) | 971 |
| Items normalised: | |||
| Restructuring | 79 | 188 | 165 |
| Gains arising on repurchase of subordinated liabilities | (69) | – | – |
| Goodwill impairment (note 8) | – | 320 | – |
| Net loss on business disposed and available-for-sale fi nancial instruments (included within note 5) |
– | (78) | – |
| Impact of US Tax Reform (note 9) | – | 220 | – |
| Tax on normalised items1 | 131 | (31) | (5) |
| Underlying profi t | 1,484 | 422 | 1,131 |
| Basic – Weighted average number of shares (millions) | 3,303 | 3,296 | 3,290 |
| Diluted – Weighted average number of shares (millions) | 3,337 | 3,322 | 3,327 |
| Basic earnings/(loss) per ordinary share (cents) | 40.7 | (6.0) | 29.5 |
| Diluted earnings/(loss) per ordinary share (cents) | 40.2 | (6.0)2 | 29.2 |
| Underlying basic earnings per ordinary share (cents) | 44.9 | 12.8 | 34.4 |
| Underlying diluted earnings per ordinary share (cents) | 44.5 | 12.7 | 34.0 |
1 No tax is included in respect of the impairment of goodwill as no tax relief is available
2 The impact of any diluted options has been excluded from this amount as required by IAS 33 Earnings per share
12. Financial instruments
Classifi cation and measurement
Accounting policy
The Group classifi es its fi nancial assets into the following measurement categories: amortised cost; fair value through other comprehensive income; and fair value through profi t or loss. Financial liabilities are classifi ed as either amortised cost, or held at fair value through profi t or loss. Management determines the classifi cation of its fi nancial assets and liabilities at initial recognition of the instrument or, where applicable, at the time of reclassifi cation.
Financial assets held at amortised cost and fair value through other comprehensive income
Debt instruments held at amortised cost or held at fair value through other comprehensive income (FVOCI) have contractual terms that give rise to cash fl ows that are solely payments of principal and interest (SPPI characteristics). Principal is the fair value of the fi nancial asset at initial recognition but this may change over the life of the instrument as amounts are repaid. Interest consists of consideration for the time value of money, for the credit risk associated with the principal amount outstanding during a particular period and for other basic lending risks and costs, as well as a profi t margin.
In assessing whether the contractual cash fl ows have SPPI characteristics, the Group considers the contractual terms of the instrument. This includes assessing whether the fi nancial asset contains a contractual term that could change the timing or amount of contractual cash fl ows such that it would not meet this condition. In making the assessment, the Group considers:
- ¼ Contingent events that would change the amount and timing of cash fl ows;
- ¼ Leverage features;
- ¼ Prepayment and extension terms;
- ¼ Terms that limit the Group's claim to cash fl ows from specifi ed assets (e.g. non-recourse asset arrangements); and
- ¼ Features that modify consideration of the time value of money e.g. periodical reset of interest rates.
Whether fi nancial assets are held at amortised cost or at FVOCI depend on the objectives of the business models under which the assets are held. A business model refers to how the Group manages fi nancial assets to generate cash fl ows.
The Group makes an assessment of the objective of a business model in which an asset is held at the individual product business line, and where applicable within business lines depending on the way the business is managed and information is provided to management. Factors considered include:
- ¼ How the performance of the product business line is evaluated and reported to the Group's management;
- ¼ How managers of the business model are compensated, including whether management is compensated based on the fair value of assets or the contractual cash fl ows collected;
- ¼ The risks that affect the performance of the business model and how those risks are managed; and
- ¼ The frequency, volume and timing of sales in prior periods, the reasons for such sales and expectations about future sales activity.
The Group's business model assessment is as follows:
| Business model | Business objective | Characteristics | Businesses | Products |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hold to collect | Intent is to originate fi nancial assets and hold them to maturity, collecting the contractual cash fl ows over the term of the instrument |
¼ Providing fi nancing and originating assets to earn interest income as primary income stream ¼ Performing credit risk management activities ¼ Costs include funding costs, transaction costs and impairment losses |
¼ Corporate Lending ¼ Corporate Finance ¼ Transaction Banking ¼ Retail Lending ¼ Treasury Markets (Loans and Borrowings) ¼ Financial Markets (selected) |
¼ Loans and advances ¼ Debt securities |
| Hold to collect and sell |
Business objective met through both hold to collect and by selling fi nancial assets |
¼ Portfolios held for liquidity needs; or where a certain interest yield profi le is maintained; or that are normally rebalanced to achieve matching of duration of assets and liabilities ¼ Income streams come from interest income, fair value changes and impairment losses |
¼ Treasury Markets | ¼ Derivatives ¼ Debt securities |
| Fair value through profi t or loss |
All other business objectives, including trading and managing fi nancial assets on a fair value basis |
¼ Assets held for trading ¼ Assets that are originated, purchased, and sold for profi t taking or underwriting activity ¼ Performance of the portfolio is evaluated on a fair value basis ¼ Income streams are from fair value changes or trading gains or losses |
¼ All other business lines |
¼ Derivatives ¼ Trading portfolios ¼ Financial Markets reverse repos |
Financial assets which have SPPI characteristics and that are held within a business model whose objective is to hold fi nancial assets to collect contractual cash fl ows (hold to collect) are recorded at amortised cost. Conversely, fi nancial assets which have SPPI characteristics but are held within a business model whose objective is achieved by both collecting contractual cash fl ows and selling fi nancial assets (Hold to collect and sell) are classifi ed as held at FVOCI.
Both a hold to collect business model and a hold to collect and sell business model involve holding fi nancial assets to collect the contractual cash fl ows. However, the business models are distinct by reference to the frequency and signifi cance that asset sales play in meeting the objective under which a particular group of fi nancial assets is managed. Hold to collect business models are characterised by asset sales that are incidental to meeting the objectives under which a group of assets is managed. Sales of assets under a hold to collect business model can be made to manage increases in the credit risk of fi nancial assets but sales for other reasons should be infrequent or insignifi cant.
Cash fl ows from the sale of fi nancial assets under a hold to collect and sell business model, by contrast, are integral to achieving the objectives under which a particular group of fi nancial assets are managed. This may be the case where frequent sales of fi nancial assets are required to manage the Group's daily liquidity requirements or to meet regulatory requirements to demonstrate liquidity of fi nancial instruments. Sales of assets under hold to collect and sell business models are therefore both more frequent and more signifi cant in value than those under the hold to collect model.
Equity instruments designated as held at FVOCI
Non-trading equity instruments acquired for strategic purposes rather than capital gain may be irrevocably designated at initial recognition as held at FVOCI on an instrument by instrument basis. Dividends received are recognised in profi t or loss. Gains and losses arising from changes in the fair value of these instruments, including foreign exchange gains and losses, are recognised directly in equity and are never reclassifi ed to profi t or loss even on derecognition.
Financial assets and liabilities held at fair value through profi t or loss
Financial assets which are not held at amortised cost or that are not held at fair value through other comprehensive income are held at fair value through profi t or loss. Financial assets and liabilities held at fair value through profi t or loss are either mandatorily classifi ed fair value through profi t or loss or irrevocably designated at fair value through profi t or loss at initial recognition.
Mandatorily classifi ed at fair value through profi t or loss
Financial assets and liabilities which are mandatorily held at fair value through profi t or loss are split between two subcategories as follows:
Trading, including:
¼ Financial assets and liabilities held for trading, which are those acquired principally for the purpose of selling in the short term; and
¼ Derivatives.
Non-trading mandatorily at fair value through profi t or loss, including:
- ¼ Instruments in a business which has a fair value business model (see the Group's business model assessment) which are not trading or derivatives;
- ¼ Hybrid fi nancial assets that contain one or more embedded derivatives;
- ¼ Financial assets that would otherwise be measured at amortised cost or FVOCI but which do not have SPPI characteristics;
- ¼ Equity instruments that have not been designated as held at FVOCI; and
- ¼ Financial liabilities that constitute contingent consideration in a business combination.
Designated at fair value through profi t or loss
Financial assets and liabilities may be designated at fair value through profi t or loss when the designation eliminates or signifi cantly reduces a measurement or recognition inconsistency that would otherwise arise from measuring assets or liabilities on a different basis (accounting mismatch).
Interest rate swaps have been acquired by the Group with the intention of signifi cantly reducing interest rate risk on certain debt securities with fi xed rates of interest. To signifi cantly reduce the accounting mismatch between assets and liabilities and measurement bases, these debt securities have been designated at fair value through profi t or loss.
Similarly, to reduce accounting mismatches, the Group has designated certain fi nancial liabilities at fair value through profi t or loss where the liabilities either:
- ¼ Have fi xed rates of interest and interest rate swaps or other interest rate derivatives have been entered with the intention of signifi cantly reducing interest rate risk; or
- ¼ Are exposed to foreign currency risk and derivatives have been acquired with the intention of signifi cantly reducing exposure to market changes; or
- ¼ Have been acquired to fund trading asset portfolios or assets.
Financial liabilities may also be designated at fair value through profi t or loss where they are managed on a fair value basis or have a bifurcately embedded derivative where the Group is not able to separately value the embedded derivative component.
Financial liabilities held at amortised cost
Financial liabilities that are not fi nancial guarantees or loan commitments and that are not classifi ed as fi nancial liabilities held at fair value through profi t or loss are classifi ed as fi nancial liabilities held at amortised cost.
Preference shares which carry a mandatory coupon that represents a market rate of interest at the issue date, or which are redeemable on a specifi c date or at the option of the shareholder are classifi ed as fi nancial liabilities and are presented in other borrowed funds. The dividends on these preference shares are recognised in the income statement as interest expense on an amortised cost basis using the effective interest method.
Financial guarantee contracts and loan commitments
The Group issues fi nancial guarantee contracts and loan commitments in return for fees. Under a fi nancial guarantee contract, the Group undertakes to meet a customer's obligations under the terms of a debt instrument if the customer fails to do so. Loan commitments are fi rm commitments to provide credit under pre-specifi ed terms and conditions. Financial guarantee contracts and loan commitments issued at below market interest rates are initially recognised as liabilities at fair value, while fi nancial guarantees and loan commitments issued at market rates are recorded off balance sheet. Subsequently, these instruments are measured at the higher of the expected credit loss provision, and the amount initially recognised less the cumulative amount of income recognised in accordance with the principles of IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers.
Fair value of fi nancial assets and liabilities
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date in the principal market for the asset or liability, or in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market to which the Group has access at the date. The fair value of a liability includes the risk that the bank will not be able to honour its obligations.
The fair value of fi nancial instruments is generally measured on the basis of the individual fi nancial instrument. However, when a group of fi nancial assets and fi nancial liabilities is managed on the basis of its net exposure to either market risk or credit risk, the fair value of the group of fi nancial instruments is measured on a net basis.
The fair values of quoted fi nancial assets and liabilities in active markets are based on current prices. A market is regarded as active if transactions for the asset or liability take place with suffi cient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis. If the market for a fi nancial instrument, and for unlisted securities, is not active, the Group establishes fair value by using valuation techniques.
Initial recognition
Purchases and sales of fi nancial assets and liabilities held at fair value through profi t or loss, and debt securities classifi ed as fi nancial assets held at fair value through other comprehensive income are initially recognised on the trade date (the date on which the Group commits to purchase or sell the asset). Loans and advances and other fi nancial assets held at amortised cost are recognised on settlement date (the date on which cash is advanced to the borrowers).
All fi nancial instruments are initially recognised at fair value, which is normally the transaction price, plus directly attributable transaction costs for fi nancial assets which are not subsequently measured at fair value through profi t or loss.
In certain circumstances, the initial fair value may be based on a valuation technique which may lead to the recognition of profi ts or losses at the time of initial recognition. However, these profi ts or losses can only be recognised when the valuation technique used is based solely on observable market data. In those cases where the initially recognised fair value is based on a valuation model that uses unobservable inputs, the difference between the transaction price and the valuation model is not recognised immediately in the income statement but is amortised or released to the income statement as the inputs become observable, or the transaction matures or is terminated.
Subsequent measurement
Financial assets and fi nancial liabilities held at amortised cost
Financial assets and fi nancial liabilities held at amortised cost are subsequently carried at amortised cost using the effective interest method (see Interest income and expense). Foreign exchange gains and losses are recognised in the income statement.
Where a fi nancial instrument carried at amortised cost is the hedged item in a qualifying fair value hedge relationship, its carrying value is adjusted by the fair value gain or loss attributable to the hedged risk.
Financial assets held at FVOCI
Debt instruments held at FVOCI are subsequently carried at fair value, with all unrealised gains and losses arising from changes in fair value (including any related foreign exchange gains or losses) recognised in other comprehensive income and accumulated in a separate component of equity. Foreign exchange gains and losses on the amortised cost are recognised in income. Changes in expected credit losses are recognised in the profi t or loss and are accumulated in equity. On derecognition, the cumulative fair value gains or losses, net of the cumulative expected credit loss reserve, are transferred to the profi t or loss.
Equity investments designated at FVOCI are subsequently carried at fair value with all unrealised gains and losses arising from changes in fair value (including any related foreign exchange gains or losses) recognised in other comprehensive income and accumulated in a separate component of equity. On derecognition, the cumulative reserve is transferred to retained earnings and is not recycled to profi t or loss.
Financial assets and liabilities held at fair value through profi t or loss
Financial assets and liabilities mandatorily held at fair value through profi t or loss and fi nancial assets designated at fair value through profi t or loss are subsequently carried at fair value, with gains and losses arising from changes in fair value recorded in the net trading income line in the profi t or loss unless the instrument is part of a cash fl ow hedging relationship. Contractual interest income on fi nancial assets held at fair value through profi t or loss is recognised as interest income in a separate line in the profi t or loss.
Financial liabilities designated at fair value through profi t or loss
Financial liabilities designated at fair value through profi t or loss are held at fair value, with changes in fair value recognised in the net trading income line in the profi t or loss, other than that attributable to changes in credit risk. Fair value changes attributable to credit risk are recognised in other comprehensive income and recorded in a separate category of reserves unless this is expected to create or enlarge an accounting mismatch, in which case the entire change in fair value of the fi nancial liability designated at fair value through profi t or loss is recognised in profi t or loss.
Derecognition of fi nancial instruments
Financial assets are derecognised when the rights to receive cash fl ows from the fi nancial assets have expired or where the Group has transferred substantially all risks and rewards of ownership. If substantially all the risks and rewards have been neither retained nor transferred and the Group has retained control, the assets continue to be recognised to the extent of the Group's continuing involvement.
Where fi nancial assets have been modifi ed, the modifi ed terms are assessed on a qualitative and quantitative basis to determine whether a fundamental change in the nature of the instrument has occurred, such as whether the derecognition of the pre-existing instrument and the recognition of a new instrument is appropriate.
On derecognition of a fi nancial asset, the difference between the carrying amount of the asset (or the carrying amount allocated to the portion of the asset derecognised) and the sum of the consideration received (including any new asset obtained less any new liability assumed) and any cumulative gain or loss that had been recognised in other comprehensive income is recognised in profi t or loss except for equity instruments elected FVOCI (see above) and cumulative fair value adjustments attributable to the credit risk of a liability that are held in other comprehensive income.
Financial liabilities are derecognised when they are extinguished. A fi nancial liability is extinguished when the obligation is discharged, cancelled or expires and this is evaluated both qualitatively and quantitatively. However, where a fi nancial liability has been modifi ed, it is derecognised if the difference between the modifi ed cash fl ows and the original cash fl ows is more than 10 per cent.
If the Group purchases its own debt, it is derecognised and the difference between the carrying amount of the liability and the consideration paid is included in other income except for the cumulative fair value adjustments attributable to the credit risk of a liability that are held in other comprehensive income, which are never recycled to the profi t or loss.
Modifi ed fi nancial instruments
Financial assets and fi nancial liabilities whose original contractual terms have been modifi ed, including those loans subject to forbearance strategies, are considered to be modifi ed instruments. Modifi cations may include changes to the tenor, cash fl ows and or interest rates among other factors.
Where derecognition of fi nancial assets is appropriate (see Derecognition), the newly recognised residual loans are assessed to determine whether the assets should be classifi ed as purchased or originated credit impaired assets (POCI).
Where derecognition is not appropriate, the gross carrying amount of the applicable instruments is recalculated as the present value of the renegotiated or modifi ed contractual cash fl ows discounted at the original effective interest rate (or credit-adjusted effective interest rate for POCI fi nancial assets). The difference between the recalculated values and the pre-modifi ed gross carrying values of the instruments are recorded as a modifi cation gain or loss in the profi t or loss.
Gains and losses arising from modifi cations for credit reasons are recorded as part of credit impairment (see credit impairment policy). Modifi cation gains and losses arising for non-credit reasons are recognised either as part of credit impairment or within income depending on whether there has been a change in the credit risk on the fi nancial asset subsequent to the modifi cation. Modifi cation gains and losses arising on fi nancial liabilities are recognised within income. The movements in the applicable expected credit loss loan positions are disclosed in further detail in Risk review (page 42).
Reclassifi cations
Financial liabilities are not reclassifi ed subsequent to initial recognition. Reclassifi cations of fi nancial assets are made when, and only when, the business model for those assets changes. Such changes are expected to be infrequent and arise as a result of signifi cant external or internal changes such as the termination of a line of business or the purchase of a subsidiary whose business model is to realise the value of pre-existing held for trading fi nancial assets through a hold to collect model.
Financial assets are reclassifi ed at their fair value on the date of reclassifi cation and previously recognised gains and losses are not restated. Moreover, reclassifi cations of fi nancial assets between fi nancial assets held at amortised cost and fi nancial assets held at fair value through other comprehensive income do not affect effective interest rate or expected credit loss computations.
Reclassifi ed from amortised cost
Where fi nancial assets held at amortised cost are reclassifi ed to fi nancial assets held at fair value through profi t or loss, the difference between the fair value of the assets at the date of reclassifi cation and the previously recognised amortised cost is recognised in profi t or loss.
For fi nancial assets held at amortised cost that are reclassifi ed to fair value through other comprehensive income, the difference between the fair value of the assets at the date of reclassifi cation and the previously recognised gross carrying value is recognised in other comprehensive income. Additionally, the related cumulative expected credit loss amounts relating to the reclassifi ed fi nancial assets are reclassifi ed from loan loss provisions to a separate reserve in other comprehensive income at the date of reclassifi cation.
Reclassifi ed from fair value through other comprehensive income
Where fi nancial assets held at fair value through other comprehensive income are reclassifi ed to fi nancial assets held at fair value through profi t or loss, the cumulative gain or loss previously recognised in other comprehensive income is transferred to the profi t or loss.
For fi nancial assets held at fair value through other comprehensive income that are reclassifi ed to fi nancial assets held at amortised cost, the cumulative gain or loss previously recognised in other comprehensive income is adjusted against the fair value of the fi nancial asset such that the fi nancial asset is recorded at a value as if it had always been held at amortised cost. In addition, the related cumulative expected credit losses held within other comprehensive income are reversed against the gross carrying value of the reclassifi ed assets at the date of reclassifi cation.
Reclassifi ed from fair value through profi t or loss
Where fi nancial assets held at fair value through profi t or loss are reclassifi ed to fi nancial assets held at fair value through other comprehensive income or fi nancial assets held at amortised cost, the fair value at the date of reclassifi cation is used to determine the effective interest rate on the fi nancial asset going forward. In addition, the date of reclassifi cation is used as the date of initial recognition for the calculation of expected credit losses. Where fi nancial assets held at fair value through profi t or loss are reclassifi ed to fi nancial assets held at amortised cost, the fair value at the date of reclassifi cation becomes the gross carrying value of the fi nancial asset.
The Group's classifi cation of its fi nancial assets and liabilities is summarised in the following tables.
IFRS 9
| Assets at fair value | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assets | Notes | Trading \$million |
Derivatives held for hedging \$million |
Non-trading mandatorily at fair value through profi t or loss \$million |
Designated at fair value through profi t or loss \$million |
Fair value through other comprehensive income \$million |
Total fi nancial assets at fair value \$million |
Assets held at amortised cost \$million |
Total \$million |
| Cash and balances at central banks | – | – | – | – | – | – | 58,213 | 58,213 | |
| Financial assets held at fair value through profi t or loss |
|||||||||
| Loans and advances to banks1 | 175 | – | 3,069 | – | – | 3,244 | – | 3,244 | |
| Loans and advances to customers1 | 1,572 | – | 2,138 | – | – | 3,710 | – | 3,710 | |
| Reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending |
14 | – | – | 51,640 | – | – | 51,640 | – | 51,640 |
| Debt securities and other eligible bills | 18,785 | – | 386 | 367 | – | 19,538 | – | 19,538 | |
| Equity shares | 740 | – | 514 | 483 | – | 1,737 | – | 1,737 | |
| 21,272 | – | 57,747 | 850 | – | 79,869 | – | 79,869 | ||
| Derivative fi nancial instruments | 13 | 51,017 | 763 | – | – | – | 51,780 | – | 51,780 |
| Loans and advances to banks1 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 55,603 | 55,603 | |
| Loans and advances to customers1 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 255,100 | 255,100 | |
| Reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending |
14 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 12,781 | 12,781 |
| Investment securities | |||||||||
| Debt securities and other eligible bills | – | – | – | – | 115,965 | 115,965 | 6,866 | 122,831 | |
| Equity shares | – | – | – | – | 250 | 250 | – | 250 | |
| – | – | – | – | 116,215 | 116,215 | 6,866 | 123,081 | ||
| Other assets | 16 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 34,441 | 34,441 |
| Assets held for sale | 16 | – | – | – | 511 | – | 511 | 2 | 513 |
| Total at 30 June 2018 | 72,289 | 763 | 57,747 | 1,361 | 116,215 | 248,375 | 423,006 | 671,381 |
1 Further analysed in Risk review and Capital review (pages 24 to 75)
IFRS 9
| Assets at fair value | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assets | Notes | Trading \$million |
Derivatives held for hedging \$million |
Non-trading mandatorily at fair value through profi t or loss \$million |
Designated at fair value through profi t or loss \$million |
Fair value through other comprehensive income \$million |
Total fi nancial assets at fair value \$million |
Assets held at amortised cost \$million |
Total \$million |
| Cash and balances at central banks | – | – | – | – | – | – | 58,864 | 58,864 | |
| Financial assets held at fair value through profi t or loss |
|||||||||
| Loans and advances to banks1 | 320 | – | 2,545 | – | – | 2,865 | – | 2,865 | |
| Loans and advances to customers1 | 1,689 | – | 2,179 | 39 | – | 3,907 | – | 3,907 | |
| Reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending |
14 | – | – | 45,518 | – | – | 45,518 | – | 45,518 |
| Debt securities and other eligible bills | 19,318 | – | 504 | 393 | – | 20,215 | – | 20,215 | |
| Equity shares | 718 | – | 684 | 733 | – | 2,135 | – | 2,135 | |
| 22,045 | – | 51,430 | 1,165 | – | 74,640 | – | 74,640 | ||
| Derivative fi nancial instruments | 13 | 46,333 | 698 | – | – | – | 47,031 | – | 47,031 |
| Loans and advances to banks1 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 57,194 | 57,194 | |
| Loans and advances to customers1 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 246,941 | 246,941 | |
| Reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending |
14 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 9,667 | 9,667 |
| Investment securities | |||||||||
| Debt securities and other eligible bills | – | – | – | – | 108,411 | 108,411 | 7,188 | 115,599 | |
| Equity shares | – | – | – | – | 214 | 214 | – | 214 | |
| – | – | – | – | 108,625 | 108,625 | 7,188 | 115,813 | ||
| Other assets | 16 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 29,922 | 29,922 |
| Assets held for sale | 16 | – | – | – | 466 | – | 466 | 62 | 528 |
| Total at 1 January 2018 | 68,378 | 698 | 51,430 | 1,631 | 108,625 | 230,762 | 409,838 | 640,600 | |
1 Further analysed in Risk review and Capital review (pages 24 to 75)
The table above is the representation as at 1 January 2018 of the balances after the implementation of IFRS 9.
IAS 39
| Assets at fair value | Assets at amortised cost | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assets | Notes | Trading \$million |
Derivatives held for hedging \$million |
Designated at fair value through profi t or loss \$million |
Available for-sale \$million |
Total fi nancial assets at fair value \$million |
Loans and receivables \$million |
Held-to maturity \$million |
Total \$million |
| Cash and balances at central banks | – | – | – | – | – | 58,864 | – | 58,864 | |
| Financial assets held at fair value through profi t or loss |
|||||||||
| Loans and advances to banks1 | 320 | – | 2,252 | – | 2,572 | – | – | 2,572 | |
| Loans and advances to customers1 | 1,689 | – | 1,229 | – | 2,918 | – | – | 2,918 | |
| Reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending |
14 | 454 | – | 458 | – | 912 | – | – | 912 |
| Debt securities and other eligible bills | 19,318 | – | 393 | – | 19,711 | – | – | 19,711 | |
| Equity shares | 718 | – | 733 | – | 1,451 | – | – | 1,451 | |
| 22,499 | – | 5,065 | – | 27,564 | – | – | 27,564 | ||
| Derivative fi nancial instruments | 13 | 46,333 | 698 | – | – | 47,031 | – | – | 47,031 |
| Loans and advances to banks1 | – | – | – | – | – | 57,494 | – | 57,494 | |
| Loans and advances to customers1 | – | – | – | – | – | 248,707 | – | 248,707 | |
| Reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending |
14 | – | – | – | – | – | 54,275 | – | 54,275 |
| Investment securities | |||||||||
| Debt securities and other eligible bills | – | – | – | 109,161 | 109,161 | 2,630 | 4,340 | 116,131 | |
| Equity shares | – | – | – | 894 | 894 | – | – | 894 | |
| – | – | – | 110,055 | 110,055 | 2,630 | 4,340 | 117,025 | ||
| Other assets | 16 | – | – | – | – | – | 29,922 | – | 29,922 |
| Assets held for sale | 16 | – | – | 466 | – | 466 | 62 | – | 528 |
| Total at 31 December 2017 | 68,832 | 698 | 5,531 | 110,055 | 185,116 | 451,954 | 4,340 | 641,410 |
1 Further analysed in Risk review and Capital review (pages 24 to 75)
IFRS 9
| Liabilities at fair value | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liabilities | Trading \$million |
Derivatives held for hedging \$million |
Designated at fair value through profi t or loss \$million |
Total fi nancial liabilities at fair value \$million |
Amortised cost \$million |
Total \$million |
|
| Financial liabilities held at fair value through profi t or loss | |||||||
| Deposits by banks | – | – | 387 | 387 | – | 387 | |
| Customer accounts | – | – | 6,232 | 6,232 | – | 6,232 | |
| Repurchase agreements and other similar secured borrowing | 14 | – | – | 47,008 | 47,008 | – | 47,008 |
| Debt securities in issue | – | – | 6,299 | 6,299 | – | 6,299 | |
| Short positions | 3,348 | – | – | 3,348 | – | 3,348 | |
| 3,348 | – | 59,926 | 63,274 | – | 63,274 | ||
| Derivative fi nancial instruments | 13 | 51,618 | 1,344 | – | 52,962 | – | 52,962 |
| Deposits by banks | – | – | – | – | 30,816 | 30,816 | |
| Customer accounts | 14 | – | – | – | – | 382,107 | 382,107 |
| Repurchase agreements and other similar secured borrowing | – | – | – | – | 5,863 | 5,863 | |
| Debt securities in issue | – | – | – | – | 46,196 | 46,196 | |
| Other liabilities | 17 | – | – | – | – | 40,071 | 40,071 |
| Subordinated liabilities and other borrowed funds | 20 | – | – | – | – | 15,047 | 15,047 |
| Total at 30 June 2018 | 54,966 | 1,344 | 59,926 | 116,236 | 520,100 | 636,336 |
| IFRS 9 | |
|---|---|
| Liabilities at fair value | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liabilities | Notes | Trading \$million |
Derivatives held for hedging \$million |
Designated at fair value through profi t or loss \$million |
Total fi nancial liabilities at fair value \$million |
Amortised cost \$million |
Total \$million |
| Financial liabilities held at fair value through profi t or loss | |||||||
| Deposits by banks | – | – | 737 | 737 | – | 737 | |
| Customer accounts | – | – | 5,236 | 5,236 | – | 5,236 | |
| Repurchase agreements and other similar secured borrowing | 14 | – | – | 38,140 | 38,140 | – | 38,140 |
| Debt securities in issue | – | – | 7,023 | 7,023 | – | 7,023 | |
| Short positions | 3,637 | – | – | 3,637 | – | 3,637 | |
| 3,637 | – | 51,136 | 54,773 | – | 54,773 | ||
| Derivative fi nancial instruments | 13 | 46,558 | 1,543 | – | 48,101 | – | 48,101 |
| Deposits by banks | – | – | – | – | 30,945 | 30,945 | |
| Customer accounts | – | – | – | – | 370,509 | 370,509 | |
| Repurchase agreements and other similar secured borrowing | 14 | – | – | – | – | 1,639 | 1,639 |
| Debt securities in issue | – | – | – | – | 46,379 | 46,379 | |
| Other liabilities | 17 | – | – | – | – | 34,982 | 34,982 |
| Subordinated liabilities and other borrowed funds | 20 | – | – | – | – | 17,176 | 17,176 |
| Total at 1 January 2018 | 50,195 | 1,543 | 51,136 | 102,874 | 501,630 | 604,504 | |
The table above is the representation as at 1 January 2018 of the balances after the implementation of IFRS 9.
IAS 39
| Liabilities at fair value | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liabilities | Notes | Trading \$million |
Derivatives held for hedging \$million |
Designated at fair value through profi t or loss \$million |
Total fi nancial liabilities at fair value \$million |
Amortised cost \$million |
Total \$million |
| Financial liabilities held at fair value through profi t or loss | |||||||
| Deposits by banks | – | – | 737 | 737 | – | 737 | |
| Customer accounts | – | – | 5,236 | 5,236 | – | 5,236 | |
| Debt securities in issue | – | – | 7,023 | 7,023 | – | 7,023 | |
| Short positions | 3,637 | – | – | 3,637 | – | 3,637 | |
| 3,637 | – | 12,996 | 16,633 | – | 16,633 | ||
| Derivative fi nancial instruments | 13 | 46,558 | 1,543 | – | 48,101 | – | 48,101 |
| Deposits by banks | – | – | – | – | 30,945 | 30,945 | |
| Customer accounts | – | – | – | – | 370,509 | 370,509 | |
| Repurchase agreements and other similar secured borrowing | 14 | – | – | – | – | 39,783 | 39,783 |
| Debt securities in issue | – | – | – | – | 46,379 | 46,379 | |
| Other liabilities | 17 | – | – | – | – | 34,982 | 34,982 |
| Subordinated liabilities and other borrowed funds | 20 | – | – | – | – | 17,176 | 17,176 |
| Total at 31 December 2017 | 50,195 | 1,543 | 12,996 | 64,734 | 539,774 | 604,508 | |
Loans and advances designated at fair value through profi t or loss
The maximum exposure to credit risk for loans and advances to banks and customers and reverse repurchase and other similar secured lending designated at fair value through profi t or loss was \$nil million (1 January 2018: \$39 million and 31 December 2017: \$3,939 million). The net fair value gain on loans and advances to banks and customers and reverse repurchase and other similar secured lending designated at fair value through profi t or loss was \$nil million (1 January 2018: \$nil and 31 December 2017: \$23 million). Of this, \$nil million (1 January 2018: \$nil and 31 December 2017: \$1 million) relates to changes in credit risk. The cumulative fair value loss attributable to changes in credit risk was \$nil million (1 January 2018: \$nil and 31 December 2017: \$1 million). Further details of the Group's valuation technique is described in this note (page 111).
Financial liabilities designated at fair value through profi t or loss
| 30.06.18 (IFRS 9) \$million |
01.01.18 (IFRS 9) \$million |
31.12.17 (IAS 39) \$million |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Carrying balance aggregate fair value | 59,926 | 51,136 | 12,996 |
| Amount contractually obliged to repay at maturity | 60,141 | 51,192 | 13,052 |
| Difference between aggregate fair value and contractually obliged to repay at maturity | (215) | (56) | (56) |
| Cumulative change in fair value accredited to credit risk difference | 219 | 82 | 82 |
The net fair value gain on fi nancial liabilities designated at fair value through profi t or loss was \$165 million for the period (31 December 2017: net loss of \$202 million). Further details of the Group's own credit adjustment (OCA) valuation technique is described later in this note.
Valuation of fi nancial instruments
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date in the principal market or, in the absence of this, the most advantageous market to which the Group has access at that date. The fair value of a liability refl ects the Group's non-performance risk. The fair value of fi nancial instruments is generally measured on the basis of the individual fi nancial instrument. However, when a group of fi nancial assets and fi nancial liabilities is managed on the basis of its net exposure to either market risks or credit risk, the fair value of the group of fi nancial instruments is measured on a net basis.
The fair values of quoted fi nancial assets and liabilities in active markets are based on current prices. A market is regarded as active if transactions for the asset or liability take place with suffi cient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis. Wherever possible, fair values have been calculated using unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for identical instruments held by the Group. Where quoted market prices are not available, or are unreliable because of poor liquidity, fair values have been determined using valuation techniques which, to the extent possible, use market observable inputs, but in some cases use non-market observable inputs. Valuation techniques used include discounted cash fl ow analysis and pricing models and, where appropriate, comparison with instruments that have characteristics similar to those of the instruments held by the Group.
The Valuation Control function is responsible for independent price verifi cation, oversight of fair value and prudent value adjustments and escalation of valuation issues. Independent price verifi cation is the process of determining that the valuations incorporated into the fi nancial statements are validated independent of the business area responsible for the product. The Valuation Control function has oversight of the fair value adjustments to ensure the fi nancial instruments are priced to exit. These are key controls in ensuring the material accuracy of the valuations incorporated in the fi nancial statements. The market data used for price verifi cation may include data sourced from recent trade data involving external counterparties or third parties such as Bloomberg, Reuters, brokers and consensus pricing providers. Valuation Control performs a semi-annual review of the suitability of the market data used for price testing. Price verifi cation uses independently sourced data that is deemed most representative of the market the instruments trade in. To determine the quality of the market data inputs, factors such as independence, relevance, reliability, availability of multiple data sources and methodology employed by the pricing provider are taken into consideration.
Formal committees for the business clusters, consisting of representatives from Group Market Risk, Product Control, Valuation Control and the business meet monthly to discuss and approve the valuations of the inventory. For Principal Finance, the Investment Committee meeting is held on a quarterly basis to review investments and valuations. The business cluster valuation committees fall under the Valuation Benchmarks Committee as part the of the valuation governance structure.
Signifi cant accounting estimates and judgements
The Group evaluates the signifi cance of fi nancial instruments and material accuracy of the valuations incorporated in the fi nancial statements as they involve a high degree of judgement and estimation uncertainty in determining the carrying values of fi nancial assets and liabilities at the balance sheet date.
- ¼ Fair value of fi nancial instruments are determined using valuation techniques (see below) which, to the extent possible, use market observable inputs, but in some cases use non-market observable inputs. Changes in the observability of signifi cant valuation inputs can materially affect the fair values of fi nancial instruments
- ¼ When establishing the exit price of a fi nancial instrument using a valuation technique, the Group considers valuation adjustments in determining the fair value (page 112)
- ¼ In determining the valuation of fi nancial instruments, the Group makes judgements on the amounts reserved to cater for model and valuation risks, which cover both Level 2 and Level 3 assets, and the signifi cant valuation judgements in respect of Level 3 instruments (page 113)
- ¼ Where the measurement of fair value is more judgemental in respect of Level 3 assets, these are valued based on models that use a signifi cant degree of non-market-based unobservable inputs
Valuation techniques
Refer to the fair value hierarchy explanation – Level 1, 2 and 3 (page 113)
¼ Financial instruments held at fair value
- Debt securities asset backed securities: Asset backed securities are priced based on external prices obtained from consensus pricing providers, broker quotes, recent trades, arrangers' quotes, etc. Where an observable price is available for a given security, it is classifi ed as Level 2. In instances where third-party prices are not available or reliable, the security is classifi ed as Level 3. The fair value of Level 3 securities is estimated using market standard cash fl ow models with input parameter assumptions which include prepayment speeds, default rates, discount margins derived from comparable securities with similar vintage, collateral type and credit ratings. Therefore, once external pricing has been verifi ed, an assessment is made of whether each security is traded with signifi cant liquidity based on its credit rating and sector. If a security is of high credit rating and is traded in a liquid sector, it will be classifi ed as Level 2, otherwise it will be classifi ed as Level 3
- Debt securities in issue: These debt securities relate to structured notes issued by the Group. Where independent market data is available through pricing vendors and broker sources, these positions are classifi ed as Level 2. Where such liquid external prices are not available, valuations of these debt securities are implied using input parameters such as bond spreads and credit spreads, and are classifi ed as Level 3. These input parameters are determined with reference to the same issuer (if available) or proxies from comparable issuers or assets
- Derivatives: Derivative products are classifi ed as Level 2 if the valuation of the product is based upon input parameters which are observable from independent and reliable market data sources. Derivative products are classifi ed as Level 3 if there are signifi cant valuation input parameters which are unobservable in the market, such as products where the performance is linked to more than one underlying variable. Examples are foreign exchange basket options, equity options based on the performance of two or more underlying indices and interest rate products with quanto payouts. In most cases these unobservable correlation parameters cannot be implied from the market, and methods such as historical analysis and comparison with historical levels or other benchmark data must be employed
- Equity shares private equity: The majority of private equity unlisted investments are valued based on earning multiples Price-to-Earnings (P/E) or enterprise value to earnings before income tax, depreciation and amortisation (EV/EBITDA) ratios – of comparable listed companies. The two primary inputs for the valuation of these investments are the actual or forecast earnings of the investee companies and earning multiples for the comparable listed companies. To ensure comparability between these unquoted investments and the comparable listed companies, appropriate adjustments are also applied (for example, liquidity and size) in the valuation. In circumstances where an investment does not have direct comparables or where the multiples for the comparable companies cannot be sourced from reliable external sources, alternative valuation techniques (for example, discounted cash fl ow models), which use predominantly unobservable inputs or Level 3 inputs, may be applied. Even though earning multiples for the comparable listed companies can be sourced from third-party sources (for example, Bloomberg), and those inputs can be deemed Level 2 inputs, all unlisted investments (excluding those where observable inputs are available, for example, over-the-counter (OTC) prices) are classifi ed as Level 3 on the basis that the valuation methods involve judgements ranging from determining comparable companies to discount rates where the discounted cash fl ow method is applied
- Loans and advances: These primarily include loans in the global syndications business which were not syndicated as of the balance sheet date and other fi nancing transactions within Financial Markets and loans and advances including reverse repurchase that do not have SPPI cash fl ows or are managed on a fair value basis. These loans are generally bilateral in nature and, where available, their valuation is based on market observable credit spreads. If observable credit spreads are not available, proxy spreads based on comparable loans with similar credit grade, sector and region, are used. Where observable credit spreads and market standard proxy methods are available, these loans are classifi ed as Level 2. Where there are no recent transactions or comparable loans, these loans are classifi ed as Level 3
- Other debt securities: These debt securities include convertible bonds, corporate bonds, credit and structured notes. Where quoted prices are available through pricing vendors, brokers or observable trading activities from liquid markets, these are classifi ed as Level 2 and valued using such quotes. Where there are signifi cant valuation inputs which are unobservable in the market, due to illiquid trading or the complexity of the product, these are classifi ed as Level 3. The valuations of these debt securities are implied using input parameters such as bond spreads and credit spreads. These input parameters are determined with reference to the same issuer (if available) or proxied from comparable issuers or assets
¼ Financial instruments held at amortised cost
The following sets out the Group's basis for establishing fair values of amortised cost fi nancial instruments and their classifi cation between Levels 1, 2 and 3. As certain categories of fi nancial instruments are not actively traded, there is a signifi cant level of management judgement involved in calculating the fair values:
- Cash and balances at central banks: The fair value of cash and balances at central banks is their carrying amounts
- Debt securities in issue, subordinated liabilities and other borrowed funds: The aggregate fair values are calculated based on quoted market prices. For those notes where quoted market prices are not available, a discounted cash fl ow model is used based on a current market related yield curve appropriate for the remaining term to maturity
- Deposits and borrowings: The estimated fair value of deposits with no stated maturity is the amount repayable on demand. The estimated fair value of fi xed interest bearing deposits and other borrowings without quoted market prices is based on discounted cash fl ows using the prevailing market rates for debts with a similar credit risk and remaining maturity
- Investment securities: For investment securities that do not have directly observable market values, the Group utilises a number of valuation techniques to determine fair value. Where available, securities are valued using input proxies from the same or closely related underlying (for example, bond spreads from the same or closely related issuer) or input proxies from a different underlying (for example, a similar bond but using spreads for a particular sector and rating). Certain instruments cannot be proxies as set out above, and in such cases the positions are valued using non-market observable inputs. This includes those instruments held at amortised cost and predominantly relates to asset backed securities. The fair value for such instruments is usually proxies from internal assessments of the underlying cash fl ows
- Loans and advances to banks and customers: For loans and advances to banks, the fair value of fl oating rate placements and overnight deposits is their carrying amounts. The estimated fair value of fi xed interest bearing deposits is based on discounted cash fl ows using the prevailing money market rates for debts with a similar credit risk and remaining maturity. The Group's loans and advances to the customers' portfolio is well diversifi ed by geography and industry. Approximately a quarter of the portfolio re-prices within one month, and approximately half re-prices within 12 months. Loans and advances are presented net of provisions for impairment. The fair value of loans and advances to customers with a residual maturity of less than one year generally approximates the carrying value. The estimated fair value of loans and advances with a residual maturity of more than one year represents the discounted amount of future cash fl ows expected to be received, including assumptions relating to prepayment rates and credit risk. Expected cash fl ows are discounted at current market rates to determine fair value. The Group has a wide range of individual instruments within its loans and advances portfolio and as a result providing quantifi cation of the key assumptions used to value such instruments is impractical
- Other assets: Other assets comprise primarilycash collateral and trades pending settlement. The carrying amount of these fi nancial instruments is considered to be a reasonable approximation of fair value as they are either short term in nature or re-price to current market rates frequently
Fair value adjustments
When establishing the exit price of a fi nancial instrument using a valuation technique, the Group considers adjustments to the modelled price which market participants would make when pricing that instrument. The main valuation adjustments (described further below) in determining fair value for fi nancial assets and fi nancial liabilities are as follows:
| 30.06.18 \$million |
31.12.17 \$million |
|
|---|---|---|
| Bid-offer valuation adjustment | 78 | 82 |
| CVA | 191 | 229 |
| DVA | (93) | (66) |
| Model valuation adjustment | 11 | 6 |
| FVA | 61 | 79 |
| Others (including day one) | 120 | 148 |
| Total | 368 | 478 |
- ¼ Bid-offer valuation adjustment: Where market parameters are marked on a mid-market basis in the revaluation systems, a bid offer valuation adjustment is required to quantify the expected cost of neutralising the business' positions through dealing away in the market, thereby bringing long positions to bid and short positions to offer. The methodology to calculate the bid-offer adjustment for a derivative portfolio involves netting between long and short positions and the grouping of risk by strike and tenor based on the hedging strategy where long positions are marked to bid and short positions marked to offer in the systems
- ¼ Credit valuation adjustment (CVA): The Group makes CVA adjustments against the fair value of derivative products. CVA is an adjustment to the fair value of the transactions to refl ect the possibility that our counterparties may default and we may not receive the full market value of the outstanding transactions. It represents an estimate of the adjustment a market participant would include when deriving a purchase price to acquire our exposures. CVA is calculated for each subsidiary, and within each entity for each counterparty to which the entity has exposure and takes account of any collateral we may hold. The Group calculates the CVA by applying the probability of default (PD) on the potential estimated future positive exposure of the counterparty using market-implied PD. Where market-implied data is not readily available, we use market-based proxies to estimate the PD. Wrong-way risk arises when the underlying value of the derivative prior to any CVA is positively correlated to the probability of default by the counterparty and the Group has implemented a model to capture this impact for certain key wrong-way exposures. The Group continues to include 'wrong-way risk' in its unaudited Prudential Valuation Adjustments
- ¼ Day one profi t and loss: In certain circumstances the initial fair value may be based on a valuation technique which may lead to the recognition of profi ts or losses at the time of initial recognition. However, these profi ts or losses can only be recognised when the valuation technique used is based primarily on observable market data. In those cases where the initially recognised fair value is based on a valuation model that uses inputs which are not observable in the market, the difference between the transaction price and the valuation model is not recognised immediately in the income statement. The difference is amortised to the income statement until the inputs become observable, or the transaction matures or is terminated
- ¼ Debit valuation adjustment (DVA): The Group calculates DVA adjustments on its derivative liabilities to refl ect changes in its own credit standing. The Group's DVA adjustments will increase if its credit standing worsens and conversely, decrease if its credit standing improves. For derivative liabilities, a DVA adjustment is determined by applying the Group's probability of default to the Group's negative expected exposure against the counterparty. The Group's probability of default and loss expected in the event of default is derived based on bond spreads associated with the Group's issuances and market standard recovery levels. The expected exposure is modelled based on a simulation methodology and is generated through the simulation of underlying risk factors over the life of the deals booked against the particular counterparty. This simulation methodology incorporates the collateral posted by the Group and the effects of master netting agreements. In December 2017, the Group refi ned its methodology used to calculate DVA to better align with current industry practice. This change in calculation methodology is treated as a change in estimate and resulted in an increase in the DVA balance of \$66 million
- ¼ Funding valuation adjustment (FVA): The Group makes FVA adjustments against derivative products. FVA refl ects an estimate of the adjustment to its fair value that a market participant would make to incorporate funding costs that could arise in relation to the exposure. FVA is calculated by determining the net expected exposure at a counterparty level and then applying a funding rate to those exposures that refl ect the market cost of funding. The FVA for collateralised derivatives is based on discounting the expected future cash fl ows at the relevant overnight indexed swap (OIS) rate after taking into consideration the terms of the underlying collateral agreement with the counterparty. The FVA for uncollateralised (including partially collateralised) derivatives incorporates the estimated present value of the market funding cost or benefi t associated with funding these transactions
- ¼ Model valuation adjustment: Valuation models may have pricing defi ciencies or limitations that require a valuation adjustment. These pricing defi ciencies or limitations arise due to the choice, implementation and calibration of the pricing model
In addition, the Group calculates own credit adjustment (OCA) on its issued debt designated at fair value, including structured notes, in order to refl ect changes in its own credit standing. The Group's OCA adjustments will increase if its credit standing worsens and conversely, decrease if its credit standing improves. For issued debt and structured notes designated at fair value, an OCA adjustment is determined by discounting the contractual cash fl ows using a yield curve adjusted for market observed secondary senior unsecured credit spreads. The OCA is \$219 million (2017: \$82 million).
Fair value hierarchy – fi nancial instruments held at fair value
Assets and liabilities carried at fair value or for which fair values are disclosed have been classifi ed into three levels according to the observability of the signifi cant inputs used to determine the fair values. Changes in the observability of signifi cant valuation inputs during the reporting period may result in a transfer of assets and liabilities within the fair value hierarchy. The Group recognises transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy when there is a signifi cant change in either its principal market or the level of observability of the inputs to the valuation techniques as at the end of the reporting period.
- ¼ Level 1: Fair value measurements are those derived from unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
- ¼ Level 2: Fair value measurements are those with quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets or quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in inactive markets and fi nancial instruments valued using models where all signifi cant inputs are observable
- ¼ Level 3: Fair value measurements are those where at least one input which could have a signifi cant effect on the instrument's valuation is not based on observable market data
The following tables show the classifi cation of fi nancial instruments held at fair value into the valuation hierarchy:
| IFRS 9 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assets | Level 1 \$million |
Level 2 \$million |
Level 3 \$million |
Total \$million |
| Financial instruments held at fair value through profi t or loss | ||||
| Loans and advances to banks | – | 3,244 | – | 3,244 |
| Loans and advances to customers | – | 2,880 | 830 | 3,710 |
| Reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending | – | 51,585 | 55 | 51,640 |
| Debt securities and other eligible bills | 6,777 | 12,394 | 367 | 19,538 |
| Of which: | ||||
| Government bonds and treasury bills | 6,083 | 5,974 | – | 12,057 |
| Issued by corporates other than fi nancial institutions | 29 | 4,468 | 367 | 4,864 |
| Issued by fi nancial institutions | 665 | 1,952 | – | 2,617 |
| Equity shares | 900 | 23 | 814 | 1,737 |
| Derivative fi nancial instruments | 704 | 51,033 | 43 | 51,780 |
| Of which: | ||||
| Foreign exchange | 87 | 38,873 | 29 | 38,989 |
| Interest rate | 3 | 11,343 | 8 | 11,354 |
| Commodity | 614 | 456 | 3 | 1,073 |
| Credit | – | 304 | – | 304 |
| Equity and stock index | – | 57 | 3 | 60 |
| Investment securities | ||||
| Debt securities and other eligible bills | 66,943 | 48,461 | 561 | 115,965 |
| Of which: | ||||
| Government bonds and treasury bills | 54,247 | 19,278 | 400 | 73,925 |
| Issued by corporates other than fi nancial institutions | 3,032 | 10,585 | 161 | 13,778 |
| Issued by fi nancial institutions | 9,664 | 18,598 | – | 28,262 |
| Equity shares | 36 | 4 | 210 | 250 |
| Total fi nancial instruments at 30 June 2018 | 75,360 | 169,624 | 2,880 | 247,864 |
| Liabilities | ||||
| Financial instruments held at fair value through profi t or loss | ||||
| Deposits by banks | – | 383 | 4 | 387 |
| Customer accounts | – | 6,232 | – | 6,232 |
| Repurchase agreements and other similar secured borrowing | – | 47,008 | – | 47,008 |
| Debt securities in issue | – | 5,971 | 328 | 6,299 |
| Short positions | 1,821 | 1,527 | – | 3,348 |
| Derivative fi nancial instruments | 986 | 51,946 | 30 | 52,962 |
| Of which: | ||||
| Foreign exchange | 296 | 38,471 | 4 | 38,771 |
| Interest rate | 22 | 11,606 | 20 | 11,648 |
| Commodity | 668 | 772 | – | 1,440 |
| Credit | – | 1,064 | – | 1,064 |
| Equity and stock index | – | 33 | 6 | 39 |
| Total fi nancial instruments at 30 June 2018 | 2,807 | 113,067 | 362 | 116,236 |
There have been no signifi cant changes to valuation or levelling approaches in 2018.
There are no signifi cant transfers of fi nancial assets and liabilities measured at fair value between Level 1 and Level 2 during the period.
| IFRS 9 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assets | Level 1 \$million |
Level 2 \$million |
Level 3 \$million |
Total \$million |
| Financial instruments held at fair value through profi t or loss | ||||
| Loans and advances to banks | – | 2,794 | 71 | 2,865 |
| Loans and advances to customers | – | 3,190 | 717 | 3,907 |
| Reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending | – | 45,518 | – | 45,518 |
| Debt securities and other eligible bills | 5,860 | 13,924 | 431 | 20,215 |
| Of which: | ||||
| Government bonds and treasury bills | 4,988 | 5,529 | – | 10,517 |
| Issued by corporates other than fi nancial institutions | 171 | 4,115 | 280 | 4,566 |
| Issued by fi nancial institutions | 701 | 4,280 | 151 | 5,132 |
| Equity shares | 1,035 | – | 1,100 | 2,135 |
| Derivative fi nancial instruments | 402 | 46,589 | 40 | 47,031 |
| Of which: | ||||
| Foreign exchange | 97 | 35,641 | 17 | 35,755 |
| Interest rate | 2 | 10,065 | 7 | 10,074 |
| Commodity | 303 | 609 | 2 | 914 |
| Credit | – | 249 | – | 249 |
| Equity and stock index | – | 25 | 14 | 39 |
| Investment securities | ||||
| Debt securities and other eligible bills | 61,083 | 47,010 | 318 | 108,411 |
| Of which: | ||||
| Government bonds and treasury bills | 51,095 | 21,417 | 318 | 72,830 |
| Issued by corporates other than fi nancial institutions | 5,647 | 7,061 | – | 12,708 |
| Issued by fi nancial institutions | 4,341 | 18,532 | – | 22,873 |
| Equity shares | 59 | 5 | 150 | 214 |
| Total fi nancial instruments at 1 January 2018 | 68,439 | 159,030 | 2,827 | 230,296 |
| Liabilities | ||||
| Financial instruments held at fair value through profi t or loss | ||||
| Deposits by banks | – | 668 | 69 | 737 |
| Customer accounts | – | 5,236 | – | 5,236 |
| Repurchase agreements and other similar secured borrowing | – | 38,140 | – | 38,140 |
| Debt securities in issue | – | 6,581 | 442 | 7,023 |
| Short positions | 1,495 | 2,142 | – | 3,637 |
| Derivative fi nancial instruments | 470 | 47,606 | 25 | 48,101 |
| Of which: | ||||
| Foreign exchange | 90 | 36,149 | – | 36,239 |
| Interest rate | 9 | 9,851 | 18 | 9,878 |
| Commodity | 371 | 590 | – | 961 |
| Credit | – | 871 | 2 | 873 |
| Equity and stock index | – | 145 | 5 | 150 |
| Total fi nancial instruments at 1 January 2018 | 1,965 | 100,373 | 536 | 102,874 |
The table above is the representation as at 1 January 2018 of the balances after the implementation of IFRS 9.
| IAS 39 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assets | Level 1 \$million |
Level 2 \$million |
Level 3 \$million |
Total \$million |
| Financial instruments held at fair value through profi t or loss | ||||
| Loans and advances to banks | – | 2,501 | 71 | 2,572 |
| Loans and advances to customers | – | 2,792 | 126 | 2,918 |
| Reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending | – | 912 | – | 912 |
| Debt securities and other eligible bills | 5,860 | 13,800 | 51 | 19,711 |
| Of which: | ||||
| Government bonds and treasury bills | 4,988 | 5,531 | – | 10,519 |
| Issued by corporates other than fi nancial institutions | 171 | 4,017 | 48 | 4,236 |
| Issued by fi nancial institutions | 701 | 4,252 | 3 | 4,956 |
| Equity shares | 725 | – | 726 | 1,451 |
| Derivative fi nancial instruments | 402 | 46,589 | 40 | 47,031 |
| Of which: | ||||
| Foreign exchange | 97 | 35,641 | 17 | 35,755 |
| Interest rate | 2 | 10,065 | 7 | 10,074 |
| Commodity | 303 | 609 | 2 | 914 |
| Credit | – | 249 | – | 249 |
| Equity and stock index | – | 25 | 14 | 39 |
| Investment securities | ||||
| Debt securities and other eligible bills | 61,246 | 47,511 | 404 | 109,161 |
| Of which: | ||||
| Government bonds and treasury bills | 51,257 | 21,364 | 318 | 72,939 |
| Issued by corporates other than fi nancial institutions | 5,648 | 7,590 | 86 | 13,324 |
| Issued by fi nancial institutions | 4,341 | 18,557 | – | 22,898 |
| Equity shares | 369 | 5 | 520 | 894 |
| Total fi nancial instruments at 31 December 2017 | 68,602 | 114,110 | 1,938 | 184,650 |
| Liabilities | ||||
| Financial instruments held at fair value through profi t or loss | ||||
| Deposits by banks | – | 668 | 69 | 737 |
| Customer accounts | – | 5,236 | – | 5,236 |
| Debt securities in issue | – | 6,581 | 442 | 7,023 |
| Short positions | 1,495 | 2,142 | – | 3,637 |
| Derivative fi nancial instruments | 470 | 47,606 | 25 | 48,101 |
| Of which: | ||||
| Foreign exchange | 90 | 36,149 | – | 36,239 |
| Interest rate | 9 | 9,851 | 18 | 9,878 |
| Commodity | 371 | 590 | – | 961 |
| Credit | – | 871 | 2 | 873 |
| Equity and stock index | – | 145 | 5 | 150 |
| Total fi nancial instruments at 31 December 2017 | 1,965 | 62,233 | 536 | 64,734 |
There were no signifi cant changes to valuation or levelling approaches in 2017.
There were no signifi cant transfers of fi nancial assets and liabilities measured at fair value between Level 1 and Level 2 during 2017.
Fair value hierarchy – fi nancial instruments measured at amortised cost
The following table shows the carrying amounts and incorporates the Group's estimate of fair values of those fi nancial assets and liabilities not presented on the Group's balance sheet at fair value. These fair values may be different from the actual amount that will be received or paid on the settlement or maturity of the fi nancial instrument. For certain instruments, the fair value may be determined using assumptions for which no observable prices are available.
IFRS 9
| Fair value | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carrying value \$million |
Level 1 \$million |
Level 2 \$million |
Level 3 \$million |
Total \$million |
|
| Assets | |||||
| Cash and balances at central banks1 | 58,213 | – | 58,213 | – | 58,213 |
| Loans and advances to banks | 55,603 | – | 55,202 | 301 | 55,503 |
| Loans and advances to customers | 255,100 | – | 12,884 | 242,876 | 255,760 |
| Reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending |
12,781 | – | 9,652 | 3,147 | 12,799 |
| Investment securities | 6,866 | – | 6,796 | 8 | 6,804 |
| Other assets1 | 34,441 | – | 34,443 | – | 34,443 |
| Assets held for sale | 2 | – | 2 | – | 2 |
| At 30 June 2018 | 423,006 | – | 177,192 | 246,332 | 423,524 |
| Liabilities | |||||
| Deposits by banks | 30,816 | – | 30,818 | – | 30,818 |
| Customer accounts | 382,107 | – | 382,143 | – | 382,143 |
| Repurchase agreements and other similar secured borrowing | 5,863 | – | 5,758 | 105 | 5,863 |
| Debt securities in issue | 46,196 | 15,623 | 30,574 | – | 46,197 |
| Subordinated liabilities and other borrowed funds | 15,047 | 14,924 | – | – | 14,924 |
| Other liabilities1 | 40,071 | – | 40,071 | – | 40,071 |
| At 30 June 2018 | 520,100 | 30,547 | 489,364 | 105 | 520,016 |
IFRS 9
| Carrying value \$million |
Level 1 \$million |
Level 2 \$million |
Level 3 \$million |
Total \$million |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 58,864 | – | 58,864 | – | 58,864 | |
| 57,194 | – | 57,166 | 4 | 57,170 | |
| 246,941 | – | 15,285 | 232,394 | 247,679 | |
| 9,667 | – | 7,506 | 2,174 | 9,680 | |
| 7,188 | – | 7,133 | 86 | 7,219 | |
| 29,922 | – | 29,911 | – | 29,911 | |
| 62 | – | 62 | – | 62 | |
| 409,838 | – | 175,927 | 234,658 | 410,585 | |
| 30,945 | – | 30,939 | – | 30,939 | |
| 370,509 | – | 370,489 | – | 370,489 | |
| 1,639 | – | 1,639 | – | 1,639 | |
| 46,379 | 15,264 | 30,158 | – | 45,422 | |
| 17,176 | 17,456 | 161 | – | 17,617 | |
| 34,982 | – | 34,982 | – | 34,982 | |
| 501,630 | 32,720 | 468,368 | – | 501,088 | |
| Fair value |
1 The carrying amount of these fi nancial instruments is considered to be a reasonable approximation of fair value as they are short-term in nature or reprice to current market rates frequently
The table above is the representation as at 1 January 2018 of the balances after the implementation of IFRS 9.
IAS 39
| Fair value | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carrying value \$million |
Level 1 \$million |
Level 2 \$million |
Level 3 \$million |
Total \$million |
||
| Assets | ||||||
| Cash and balances at central banks1 | 58,864 | – | 58,864 | – | 58,864 | |
| Loans and advances to banks | 57,494 | – | 57,388 | 4 | 57,392 | |
| Loans and advances to customers | 248,707 | – | 14,644 | 234,812 | 249,456 | |
| Reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending |
54,275 | – | 23,068 | 31,218 | 54,286 | |
| Investment securities | 6,970 | – | 6,955 | 36 | 6,991 | |
| Other assets1 | 29,922 | – | 29,922 | – | 29,922 | |
| Assets held for sale | 62 | – | 62 | – | 62 | |
| At 31 December 2017 | 456,294 | – | 190,903 | 266,070 | 456,973 | |
| Liabilities | ||||||
| Deposits by banks | 30,945 | – | 30,939 | – | 30,939 | |
| Customer accounts | 370,509 | – | 370,489 | – | 370,489 | |
| Repurchase agreements and other similar secured borrowing | 39,783 | – | 39,783 | – | 39,783 | |
| Debt securities in issue | 46,379 | 15,264 | 30,158 | – | 45,422 | |
| Subordinated liabilities and other borrowed funds | 17,176 | 17,456 | 161 | – | 17,617 | |
| Other liabilities1 | 34,982 | – | 34,982 | – | 34,982 | |
| At 31 December 2017 | 539,774 | 32,720 | 506,512 | – | 539,232 | |
1 The carrying amount of these fi nancial instruments is considered to be a reasonable approximation of fair value as they are short-term in nature or reprice to current market rates frequently
Level 3 Summary and signifi cant unobservable inputs
The following table presents the Group's primary Level 3 fi nancial instruments which are held at fair value. The table also presents the valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of those fi nancial instruments, the signifi cant unobservable inputs, the range of values for those inputs and the weighted average of those inputs:
| Value at 30 June 2018 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Instrument | Assets \$million |
Liabilities \$million |
Principal valuation technique | Signifi cant unobservable inputs | Range1 | Weighted average2 |
| Reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending |
55 | – | Discounted cash fl ows | Repo rate | 0.0% to 11.0% | 2.7% |
| Loans and advances to customers | 830 | – | Comparable pricing/yield | Price/yield | 4.8% | 4.8% |
| Discounted cash fl ows | Recovery rates | 24.3% to 100.0% | 93.9% | |||
| Debt securities | 212 | – | Comparable pricing/yield | Price/yield | N/A | N/A |
| Asset backed securities | 316 | – | Discounted cash fl ows | Price/yield | 1.0% to 5.8% | 4.0% |
| Deposits by banks | – | 4 | Discounted cash fl ows | Credit spreads | 1.0% | 1.0% |
| Debt securities in issue | – | 328 | Discounted cash fl ows | Credit spreads | 0.3% to 4% | 1.5% |
| Government bonds and treasury bills | 400 | – | Discounted cash fl ows | Price/yield | 2.8% to 32.7% | 10.6% |
| Derivative fi nancial instruments of which: |
||||||
| Foreign exchange | 29 | 4 | Option pricing model | Foreign exchange option implied volatility |
5.0% to 7.5% | 5.8% |
| Discounted cash fl ows | Foreign exchange curves | 3.9% to 5.0% | 4.2% | |||
| Interest rate | 8 | 20 | Discounted cash fl ows | Interest rate curves | 3.5% to 19.2% | 11.7% |
| Commodities | 3 | – | Internal pricing model | Commodities correlation | 90.0% to 93.8% | 93.1% |
| Equity | 3 | 6 | Internal pricing model | Equity correlation | 7.0% to 88.0% | N/A |
| Equity-FX correlation | -85.0% to 85.0% | N/A | ||||
| Equity shares (includes private | 1,024 | – | Comparable pricing/yield | EV/EBITDA multiples | 5.5x to 17.2x | 10.1x |
| equity investments)3 | P/E multiples | 13.0x to 15.1x | 14.2x | |||
| P/B multiples | 1.3x | 1.3x | ||||
| P/S multiples | 2.3x | 2.3x | ||||
| Liquidity discount | 10.0% to 20.0% | 17.3% | ||||
| Discounted cash fl ows | Discount rates | 8.6% to 14.0% | 11.6% | |||
| Total | 2,880 | 362 |
1 The ranges of values shown in the above table represent the highest and lowest levels used in the valuation of the Group's Level 3 fi nancial instruments as at 30 June 2018. The ranges of values used are refl ective of the underlying characteristics of these Level 3 fi nancial instruments based on the market conditions at the balance sheet date. However, these ranges of values may not represent the uncertainty in fair value measurements of the Group's Level 3 fi nancial instruments
2 Weighted average for non-derivative fi nancial instruments has been calculated by weighting inputs by the relative fair value. Weighted average for derivatives has been provided by weighting inputs by the risk relevant to that variable. N/A has been entered for the cases where weighted average is not a meaningful indicator
3 The Group has an equity investment in the Series B preferred shares of Ripple Labs, Inc., which owns a digital currency (XRP) and is being carried at a fair value based on the shares' initial offering price. The shares will continue to be valued at the initial offering price until such time as a reliable means of valuing the cash fl ows and underlying assets is possible or additional sales are observable
The following section describes the signifi cant unobservable inputs identifi ed in the valuation technique table:
- ¼ Commodities correlation: This refers to the correlation between two commodity underlyings over a specifi ed time
- ¼ Comparable price/yield is a valuation methodology in which the price of a comparable instrument is used to estimate the fair value where there are no direct observable prices. Yield is the interest rate that is used to discount the future cash fl ows in a discounted cash fl ow model. Valuation using comparable instruments can be done by calculating an implied yield (or spread over a liquid benchmark) from the price of a comparable instrument, then adjusting that yield (or spread) to derive a value for the instrument. The adjustment should account for relevant differences in the fi nancial instruments such as maturity and/or credit quality. Alternatively, a price-to-price basis can be assumed between the comparable instrument and the instrument being valued in order to establish the value of the instrument (for example, deriving a fair value for a junior unsecured bond from the price of a senior secured bond). An increase in price, in isolation, would result in a favourable movement in the fair value of the asset. An increase in yield, in isolation, would result in an unfavourable movement in the fair value of the asset
- ¼ Correlation is the measure of how movement in one variable infl uences the movement in another variable. An equity correlation is the correlation between two equity instruments while an interest rate correlation refers to the correlation between two swap rates
- ¼ Credit spread represents the additional yield that a market participant would demand for taking exposure to the credit risk of an instrument
- ¼ Discount rate refers to the rate of return used to convert expected cash fl ows into present value
- ¼ EV/EBITDA ratio multiples: This is the ratio of Enterprise Value (EV) to Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortisation (EBITDA). EV is the aggregate market capitalisation and debt minus the cash and cash equivalents. An increase in EV/EBITDA multiples in isolation, will result in a favourable movement in the fair value of the unlisted fi rm
- ¼ Interest rate curves is the term structure of interest rates and measure of future interest rates at a particular point in time
- ¼ Liquidity discounts in the valuation of unlisted investments: A liquidity discount is primarily applied to the valuation of unlisted fi rms' investments to refl ect the fact that these stocks are not actively traded. An increase in liquidity discount will result in unfavourable movement in the fair value of the unlisted fi rm
- ¼ Price-Book (P/B) multiple: This is the ratio of the market value of equity to the book value of equity. An increase in P/B multiple will result in a favourable movement in the fair value of the unlisted fi rm
- ¼ Price-Earnings (P/E) multiples: This is the ratio of the market value of equity to the net income after tax. The multiples are determined from multiples of listed comparables, which are observable. An increase in P/E multiple will result in a favourable movement in the fair value of the unlisted fi rm
- ¼ Price-Sales (P/S) multiple: This is the ratio of the market value of equity to sales. An increase in P/S multiple will result in a favourable movement in the fair value of the unlisted fi rm
- ¼ Recovery rates are the expectation of the rate of return resulting from the liquidation of a particular loan. As the probability of default increases for a given instrument, the valuation of that instrument will increasingly refl ect its expected recovery level assuming default. An increase in the recovery rate, in isolation, would result in a favourable movement in the fair value of the loan
- ¼ Volatility represents an estimate of how much a particular instrument, parameter or index will change in value over time. Generally, the higher the volatility, the more expensive the option will be
Level 3 movement tables – fi nancial assets
The table below analyses movements in Level 3 fi nancial assets carried at fair value.
| Held at fair value through profi t or loss | Investment securities | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assets | Loans and advances to banks \$million |
Loans and advances to customers \$million |
Reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending |
Debt securities and other eligible bills \$million |
Equity shares \$million |
Derivative fi nancial instruments \$million |
Debt securities and other eligible bills \$million |
Equity shares \$million |
Total \$million |
| At 31 December 2017 – IAS 39 | 71 | 126 | – | 51 | 726 | 40 | 404 | 520 | 1,938 |
| Transfer due to IFRS 91 | – | 591 | – | 380 | 374 | – | (86) | (370) | 889 |
| At 1 January 2018 – IFRS 9 | 71 | 717 | – | 431 | 1,100 | 40 | 318 | 150 | 2,827 |
| Total (losses)/gains recognised in income statement |
– | (50) | – | (5) | (35) | (1) | 10 | – | (81) |
| Net interest income | – | – | – | – | – | – | 10 | – | 10 |
| Net trading income | – | (50) | – | (5) | (35) | (1) | – | – | (91) |
| Other operating income | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Impairment charge | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Total (losses)/gains recognised in other comprehensive income |
– | – | – | – | – | – | (7) | 29 | 22 |
| Fair value through OCI reserve | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 30 | 30 |
| Exchange difference | – | – | – | – | – | – | (7) | (1) | (8) |
| Purchases | – | 188 | 55 | 76 | 119 | 29 | 341 | 23 | 831 |
| Sales | – | (19) | – | (110) | (144) | (11) | – | – | (284) |
| Settlements | (71) | (54) | – | – | – | (11) | (101) | – | (237) |
| Transfers out2 | – | – | – | (25) | (226) | (3) | – | – | (254) |
| Transfers in3 | – | 48 | – | – | – | – | – | 8 | 56 |
| At 30 June 2018 | – | 830 | 55 | 367 | 814 | 43 | 561 | 210 | 2,880 |
| Total unrealised gainsrecognised in the income statement, within net interest income, relating to change in fair value of assets held at 30 June 2018 |
– | – | – | – | – | – | – | 30 | 30 |
| Total unrealised (losses)/gains recognised in the income statement, within net trading income, relating to change in fair value of assets held at 30 June 2018 |
– | (38) | – | (2) | (28) | 1 | – | – | (67) |
1 The increase in level three instruments is a result of loans and debt securities that failed SPPI, with unobservable valuation inputs. Further, level three equity shares which were classifi ed as available-for-sale equity under IAS 39 are now classifi ed as fair value through profi t or loss under IFRS 9
2 Transfers out include debt securities and other eligible bills, equity shares and derivative fi nancial instruments where the valuation parameters became observable during the period, and were transferred to Level 1 and Level 2
3 Transfers in primarily relate to loans and advances and equity shares where the valuation parameters became unobservable during the period
Level 3 movement tables – fi nancial assets
The table below analyses movements in Level 3 fi nancial assets carried at fair value.
| Held at fair value through profi t or loss | Investment securities | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assets | Loans and advances to banks \$million |
Loans and advances to customers \$million |
Debt securities and other eligible bills \$million |
Equity shares \$million |
Derivative fi nancial instruments \$million |
Debt securities and other eligible bills \$million |
Equity shares \$million |
Total \$million |
| At 1 January 2017 | – | 179 | 4 | 995 | 360 | 199 | 549 | 2,286 |
| Total (losses)/gains recognised in income statement |
(1) | (11) | (2) | 121 | (4) | (15) | (9) | 79 |
| Net interest income | – | – | – | – | – | (15) | – | (15) |
| Net trading income | (1) | (11) | (2) | 121 | (4) | – | (1) | 102 |
| Other operating income | – | – | – | – | – | – | 9 | 9 |
| Impairment charge | – | – | – | – | – | – | (17) | (17) |
| Total gains recognised in other comprehensive income |
– | – | – | – | – | 7 | 54 | 61 |
| Available-for-sale reserve | – | – | – | – | – | – | 41 | 41 |
| Exchange difference | – | – | – | – | – | 7 | 13 | 20 |
| Purchases | – | – | 94 | 1113 | 6 | 399 | 22 | 632 |
| Sales | – | – | (20) | (254) | (13) | (1) | (91) | (379) |
| Settlements | – | – | – | – | (250) | (169) | – | (419) |
| Transfers out1 | – | (72) | (25) | (247)3 | (61) | (16) | (5) | (426) |
| Transfers in2 | 72 | 30 | – | – | 2 | – | – | 104 |
| At 31 December 2017 | 71 | 126 | 51 | 726 | 40 | 404 | 520 | 1,938 |
| Total unrealised losses recognised in the income statement, within net interest income, relating to change in fair value of assets held at 31 December 2017 |
– | – | – | – | – | (15) | – | (15) |
| Total unrealised (losses)/gains recognised in the income statement, within net trading income, relating to change in fair value of assets held at 31 December 2017 |
(1) | (5) | (2) | 65 | (7) | – | (1) | 49 |
| Total unrealised losses recognised in the income statement, within impairment charges at 31 December 2017 |
– | – | – | – | – | – | (17) | (17) |
1 Transfers out include debt securities, equity shares and derivative fi nancial instruments where the valuation parameters became observable during the year, and were transferred to Level 1 and Level 2. Transfers out further relate to equity shares and debt securities held at fair value through profi t or loss which are now presented under held for sale
2 Transfers in during the year primarily relate to loans and advances and derivative fi nancial instruments where the valuation parameters become unobservable during the year
3 When an entity is consolidated through a step up in ownership, the additional equity shares acquired are disclosed in the purchases line. Subsequently, these shares are eliminated on consolidation and disclosed in the transfer out line. Any underlying Level 3 fi nancial instruments which are recognised as a result of the consolidation are disclosed in the transfer in line
Level 3 movement tables – fi nancial liabilities
| 30.06.18 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deposits by banks \$million |
Debt securities in issue \$million |
Derivative fi nancial instruments \$million |
Total \$million |
||
| At 1 January 2018 | 69 | 442 | 25 | 536 | |
| Total losses/(gains) recognised in income statement – net trading income | 2 | (16) | (9) | (23) | |
| Issues | – | 1 | 14 | 15 | |
| Settlements | (67) | (99) | (3) | (169) | |
| Transfers in1 | – | – | 3 | 3 | |
| At 30 June 2018 | 4 | 328 | 30 | 362 | |
| Total unrealised gains recognised in the income statement, within net trading income, relating to change in fair value of liabilities held at 30 June 2018 |
– | (13) | (5) | (18) |
1 Transfers in primarily relate to derivative fi nancial instruments where the valuation parameters became unobservable during the period
| 31.12.17 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deposits by banks \$million |
Debt securities in issue \$million |
Derivative fi nancial instruments \$million |
Total \$million |
|||
| At 1 January 2017 | – | 530 | 316 | 846 | ||
| Total gains recognised in income statement – net trading income | – | (9) | (24) | (33) | ||
| Issues | 79 | 274 | 1 | 354 | ||
| Settlements | (10) | (353) | (266) | (629) | ||
| Transfers out1 | – | – | (2) | (2) | ||
| At 31 December 2017 | 69 | 442 | 25 | 536 | ||
| Total unrealised gains recognised in the income statement, within net trading income, relating to change in fair value of liabilities held at 31 December 2017 |
– | – | (17) | (17) |
1 Transfers out during the year primarily relate to derivative fi nancial instruments where the valuation parameters became observable during the year and were transferred to Level 2 fi nancial liabilities
Sensitivities in respect of the fair values of Level 3 assets and liabilities
Sensitivity analysis is performed on products with signifi cant unobservable inputs. The Group applies a 10 per cent increase or decrease on the values of these unobservable inputs, to generate a range of reasonably possible alternative valuations. The percentage shift is determined by statistical analyses performed on a set of reference prices based on the composition of our Level 3 assets. Favourable and unfavourable changes are determined on the basis of changes in the value of the instrument as a result of varying the levels of the unobservable parameters. This Level 3 sensitivity analysis assumes a one-way market move and does not consider offsets for hedges.
| Held at fair value through profi t or loss | Fair value through OCI/available-for-sale | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net exposure \$million |
Favourable changes \$million |
Unfavourable changes \$million |
Net exposure \$million |
Favourable changes \$million |
Unfavourable changes \$million |
|
| Financial instruments held at fair value | ||||||
| Reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending |
55 | 55 | 55 | – | – | – |
| Debt securities and other eligible bills | 367 | 377 | 357 | 561 | 580 | 542 |
| Equity shares | 814 | 895 | 733 | 210 | 231 | 189 |
| Loans and advances | 830 | 854 | 804 | – | – | – |
| Derivative fi nancial instruments | 13 | 19 | 6 | – | – | – |
| Deposits by banks | (4) | (3) | (5) | – | – | – |
| Debt securities in issue | (328) | (309) | (347) | – | – | – |
| At 30 June 2018 | 1,747 | 1,888 | 1,603 | 771 | 811 | 731 |
| Financial instruments held at fair value | ||||||
| Debt securities and other eligible bills | 51 | 56 | 46 | 404 | 415 | 393 |
| Equity shares | 726 | 799 | 653 | 520 | 572 | 468 |
| Loans and advances | 197 | 201 | 194 | – | – | – |
| Derivative fi nancial instruments | 15 | 17 | 12 | – | – | – |
At 31 December 2017 478 571 385 924 987 861 The reasonably possible alternatives could have increased or decreased the fair values of fi nancial instruments held at fair value through profi t or loss and those classifi ed as fair value through OCI/available-for-sale by the amounts disclosed below.
Deposits by banks (69) (68) (70) – – – Debt securities in issue (442) (434) (450) – – –
| Financial instruments | Fair value changes | 30.06.2018 \$million |
31.12.2017 \$million |
|---|---|---|---|
| Held at fair value through profi t or loss | Possible increase | 141 | 93 |
| Possible decrease | (144) | (93) | |
| Fair value through OCI/available-for-sale | Possible increase | 40 | 63 |
| Possible decrease | (40) | (63) |
13. Derivative fi nancial instruments
The tables below analyse the notional principal amounts and the positive and negative fair values of derivative fi nancial instruments. Notional principal amounts are the amounts of principal underlying the contract at the reporting date.
| 30.06.18 | 31.12.17 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Derivatives | Notional principal amounts \$million |
Assets \$million |
Liabilities \$million |
Notional principal amounts \$million |
Assets \$million |
Liabilities \$million |
||
| Foreign exchange derivative contracts: | ||||||||
| Forward foreign exchange contracts | 2,261,144 | 21,235 | 20,947 | 1,825,488 | 18,905 | 19,702 | ||
| Currency swaps and options | 891,237 | 17,754 | 17,824 | 724,0211 | 16,850 | 16,537 | ||
| Exchange traded futures and options | 100 | – | – | 100 | – | – | ||
| 3,152,481 | 38,989 | 38,771 | 2,549,609 | 35,755 | 36,239 | |||
| Interest rate derivative contracts: | ||||||||
| Swaps | 3,508,901 | 9,914 | 10,139 | 2,831,025 | 8,603 | 8,414 | ||
| Forward rate agreements and options | 532,182 | 1,259 | 1,341 | 153,697 | 1,351 | 1,364 | ||
| Exchange traded futures and options | 956,396 | 181 | 168 | 637,883 | 120 | 100 | ||
| 4,997,479 | 11,354 | 11,648 | 3,622,605 | 10,074 | 9,878 | |||
| Credit derivative contracts | 37,891 | 304 | 1,064 | 34,772 | 249 | 873 | ||
| Equity and stock index options | 2,424 | 60 | 39 | 2,520 | 39 | 150 | ||
| Commodity derivative contracts | 119,425 | 1,073 | 1,440 | 74,133 | 914 | 961 | ||
| Total derivatives | 8,309,700 | 51,780 | 52,962 | 6,283,639 | 47,031 | 48,101 |
1 Currency swaps and options were previously reported on a gross basis. In line with industry practice, these are now reported on a single leg basis. Prior year comparatives have been re-presented accordingly
The Group limits exposure to credit losses in the event of default by entering into master netting agreements with certain market counterparties. As required by IAS 32, exposures are only presented net in these accounts where they are subject to legal right of offset and intended to be settled net in the ordinary course of business.
Derivatives held for hedging
Included in the table above are derivatives held for hedging purposes as follows:
| 30.06.18 | 31.12.17 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Notional principal amounts \$million |
Assets \$million |
Liabilities \$million |
Notional principal amounts \$million |
Assets \$million |
Liabilities \$million |
||
| Derivatives designated as fair value hedges: |
|||||||
| Interest rate swaps | 51,954 | 334 | 482 | 45,420 | 456 | 272 | |
| Currency swaps | 9,521 | 79 | 721 | 14,3951 | 174 | 899 | |
| 61,475 | 413 | 1,203 | 59,815 | 630 | 1,171 | ||
| Derivatives designated as cash fl ow hedges: |
|||||||
| Interest rate swaps | 10,949 | 81 | 80 | 13,348 | 43 | 48 | |
| Forward foreign exchange contracts | 205 | – | 18 | 356 | 2 | 29 | |
| Currency swaps | 2,413 | 36 | 43 | 2,987 | 23 | 107 | |
| 13,567 | 117 | 141 | 16,691 | 68 | 184 | ||
| Derivatives designated as net investment hedges: |
|||||||
| Forward foreign exchange contracts | 5,514 | 233 | – | 3,470 | – | 188 | |
| Total derivatives held for hedging | 80,556 | 763 | 1,344 | 79,976 | 698 | 1,543 |
1 Currency swaps were previously reported on a gross basis. In line with industry practice, these are now reported on a single leg basis. Prior year comparatives have been re-presented accordingly
14. Reverse repurchase and repurchase agreements including other similar secured lending and borrowing
Accounting policy
The Group purchases securities (a reverse repurchase agreement – 'reverse repo') typically with fi nancial institutions subject to a commitment to resell or return the securities at a predetermined price. These securities are not included in the balance sheet as the Group does not acquire the risks and rewards of ownership, however are recorded off balance sheet as collateral received. Consideration paid (or cash collateral provided) is accounted for as a loan asset at amortised cost, unless it is managed on a fair value basis or it is designated at fair value through profi t or loss.
The Group also sells securities (a repurchase agreement – 'repo') subject to a commitment to repurchase or redeem the securities at a predetermined price. The securities are retained on the balance sheet as the Group retains substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership and these securities are disclosed as pledged collateral. Consideration received (or cash collateral received) is accounted for as a fi nancial liability at amortised cost, unless it is either mandatorily classifi ed fair value through profi t or loss or irrevocably designated at fair value through profi t or loss at initial recognition.
Financial assets are pledged as collateral as part of sales and repurchases, securities borrowing and securitisation transactions under terms that are usual and customary for such activities. The Group is obliged to return equivalent securities.
Repo and reverse repo transactions typically entitle the Group and its counterparties to have recourse to assets similar to those provided as collateral in the event of a default. Securities sold subject to repos, either by way of a Global Master Repurchase Agreement (GMRA), or through a securities sale and Total Return Swap (TRS) continue to be recognised on the balance sheet as the Group retains substantially the associated risks and rewards of the securities (the TRS is not recognised). The counterparty liability is included in deposits by banks or customer accounts, as appropriate. Assets sold under repurchase agreements are considered encumbered as the group cannot pledge these to obtain funding.
Reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending
| 30.06.18 \$million |
01.01.18 \$million |
31.12.17 \$million |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Banks | 26,512 | 21,257 | 21,259 |
| Customers | 37,909 | 33,928 | 33,928 |
| 64,421 | 55,185 | 55,187 | |
| Of which: | |||
| Fair value through profi t or loss | 51,640 | 45,518 | 912 |
| Banks | 17,962 | 16,157 | 565 |
| Customers | 33,678 | 29,361 | 347 |
| Held at amortised cost | 12,781 | 9,667 | 54,275 |
| Banks | 8,550 | 5,099 | 20,694 |
| Customers | 4,231 | 4,568 | 33,581 |
Under reverse repurchase and securities borrowing arrangements, the Group obtains securities on terms which permit it to repledge or resell the securities to others. Amounts on such terms are:
| 30.06.18 \$million |
01.01.18 \$million |
31.12.17 \$million |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Securities and collateral received (at fair value) | 85,855 | 75,088 | 75,088 |
| Securities and collateral which can be repledged or sold (at fair value) | 81,367 | 72,982 | 72,982 |
| Amounts repledged/transferred to others for fi nancing activities, to satisfy liabilities under sale and repurchase agreements (at fair value) |
42,028 | 34,018 | 34,018 |
14. Reverse repurchase and repurchase agreements including other similar secured lending and borrowing continued
Repurchase agreements and other similar secured borrowing
| 30.06.18 \$million |
01.01.18 \$million |
31.12.17 \$million |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Banks | 6,196 | 3,804 | 3,804 |
| Customers | 46,675 | 35,975 | 35,979 |
| 52,871 | 39,779 | 39,783 | |
| Of which: | |||
| Fair value through profi t or loss | 47,008 | 38,140 | – |
| Banks | 3,320 | 3,352 | – |
| Customers | 43,688 | 34,788 | – |
| Held at amortised cost | 5,863 | 1,639 | 39,783 |
| Banks | 2,876 | 451 | 3,804 |
| Customers | 2,987 | 1,188 | 35,979 |
The tables below set out the fi nancial assets provided as collateral for repurchase and other secured borrowing:
| 30.06.18 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Collateral pledged against repurchase agreements | Fair value through profi t or loss \$million |
Fair value through other comprehensive income \$million |
Amortised cost \$million |
Total \$million |
||
| On-balance sheet | ||||||
| Debt securities and other eligible bills | 3,434 | 7,327 | 516 | 11,277 | ||
| Off-balance sheet | ||||||
| Repledged collateral received | – | – | 42,028 | 42,028 | ||
| At 30 June 2018 | 3,434 | 7,327 | 42,544 | 53,305 | ||
| 01.01.18 | ||||||
| Collateral pledged against repurchase agreements | Fair value through profi t or loss \$million |
Fair value through other comprehensive income \$million |
Amortised cost \$million |
Total \$million |
||
| On-balance sheet | ||||||
| Debt securities and other eligible bills | 2,178 | 3,618 | – | 5,796 | ||
| Off-balance sheet | ||||||
| Repledged collateral received | – | – | 34,018 | 34,018 | ||
| At 1 January 2018 | 2,178 | 3,618 | 34,018 | 39,814 | ||
| 31.12.17 | ||||||
| Collateral pledged against repurchase agreements | Fair value through profi t or loss \$million |
Available for sale \$million |
Loans and receivables \$million |
Total \$million |
||
| On-balance sheet | ||||||
| Debt securities and other eligible bills | 2,178 | 3,618 | – | 5,796 | ||
| Off-balance sheet | ||||||
| Repledged collateral received | – | – | 34,018 | 34,018 | ||
| At 31 December 2017 | 2,178 | 3,618 | 34,018 | 39,814 |
15. Goodwill and intangible assets
| 30.06.18 | 31.12.17 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodwill \$million |
Acquired intangibles \$million |
Computer software \$million |
Total \$million |
Goodwill \$million |
Acquired intangibles \$million |
Computer software \$million |
Total \$million |
|
| Cost | 3,187 | 559 | 2,616 | 6,362 | 3,252 | 578 | 2,529 | 6,359 |
| Provision for amortisation | – | 461 | 927 | 1,388 | – | 470 | 876 | 1,346 |
| Net book value | 3,187 | 98 | 1,689 | 4,974 | 3,252 | 108 | 1,653 | 5,013 |
| 30.06.17 | ||||||||
| Goodwill \$million |
Acquired intangibles \$million |
Computer software \$million |
Total \$million |
|||||
| Cost | 3,552 | 576 | 2,128 | 6,256 | ||||
| Provision for amortisation | – | 455 | 767 | 1,222 |
Net book value 3,552 121 1,361 5,034
At 30 June 2018, accumulated goodwill impairment losses incurred from 1 January 2005 amounted to \$2,801 million (31 December 2017: \$2,801 million), of which nil was recognised in 2018 (31 December 2017: \$320 million).
Outcome of impairment assessment
At 30 June 2018, the Group performed a review of the goodwill that has been assigned to the Group's cash generating units for indicators of impairment, considering whether there were any reduced expectations for future cash fl ows and/or fl uctuations in the discount rate or the assumptions. The results of this review indicated that there is no goodwill impairment to be recognised.
It continues to be possible that certain scenarios could be constructed where a combination of a material change in the discount rate coupled with a reduction in current business plan forecasts or the GDP growth rate would potentially result in the carrying amount of goodwill exceeding the recoverable amount in the future. Refer to note 18, Goodwill and intangible assets, in the 2017 Annual Report.
16. Other assets
| 30.06.18 \$million |
31.12.17 \$million |
|
|---|---|---|
| Financial assets held at amortised cost (note 12): | ||
| Hong Kong SAR Government certifi cates of indebtedness (note 17)1 | 5,704 | 5,417 |
| Cash collateral | 10,002 | 9,513 |
| Acceptances and endorsements | 5,138 | 5,096 |
| Unsettled trades and other fi nancial assets | 13,597 | 9,896 |
| 34,441 | 29,922 | |
| Non-fi nancial assets: | ||
| Commodities2 | 4,312 | 3,263 |
| Other assets | 315 | 305 |
| 39,068 | 33,490 |
1 The Hong Kong SAR Government certifi cates of indebtedness are subordinated to the claims of other parties in respect of bank notes issued
2 Commodities are carried at fair value and classifi ed as Level 2
16. Other assets continued
Assets held for sale
Non-current assets are classifi ed as held for sale and measured at the lower of their carrying amount and fair value less cost to sell when:
- a) Their carrying amounts will be recovered principally through sale
- b) They are available-for-sale in their present condition
- c) Their sale is highly probable
Immediately before the initial classifi cation as held for sale, the carrying amounts of the assets are measured in accordance with the applicable accounting policies related to the asset or liability before reclassifi cation as held for sale.
The assets below have been presented as held for sale following the approval of Group management and the transactions are expected to complete in 2018.
| Assets held for sale | 30.06.18 \$million |
31.12.17 \$million |
|---|---|---|
| Non-current assets | ||
| Loans and advances to customers | 2 | 2 |
| Financial assets held at fair value through profi t or loss | 511 | 466 |
| Debt securities held at amortised cost | – | 60 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 145 | 13 |
| Others | 2 | 4 |
| 660 | 545 |
Assets held for sale include:
¼ Principal Finance assets of \$511 million, classifi ed as fi nancial assets held at fair value through profi t or loss comprising debt securities (\$84 million) and equity shares (\$427 million), expected to be disposed of by the end of 2018
¼ Two aircraft classifi ed as held for sale by Pembroke Air Leasing Finance for \$136 million included within property, plant and equipment
The assets reported above are classifi ed under Level 3.
17. Other liabilities
| 30.06.18 \$million |
31.12.17 \$million |
|
|---|---|---|
| Financial liabilities held at amortised cost (note 12) | ||
| Notes in circulation1 | 5,704 | 5,417 |
| Acceptances and endorsements | 5,138 | 5,096 |
| Cash collateral | 10,631 | 9,825 |
| Unsettled trades and other fi nancial liabilities | 18,598 | 14,644 |
| 40,071 | 34,982 | |
| Non-fi nancial liabilities | ||
| Cash-settled share-based payments | 35 | 39 |
| Other liabilities | 438 | 236 |
| 40,544 | 35,257 |
1 Hong Kong currency notes in circulation of \$5,704 million (2017: \$5,417 million) that are secured by the government of Hong Kong SAR certifi cates of indebtedness of the same amount included in other assets (note 16)
18. Contingent liabilities and commitments
The table below shows the contract or underlying principal amounts of unmatured off-balance sheet transactions at the balance sheet date. The contract or underlying principal amounts indicate the volume of business outstanding and do not represent amounts at risk.
| 30.06.18 \$million |
31.12.17 \$million |
|
|---|---|---|
| Contingent liabilities | ||
| Guarantees and irrevocable letters of credit | 37,422 | 37,311 |
| Other contingent liabilities | 5,116 | 6,210 |
| 42,538 | 43,521 | |
| Commitments | ||
| Documentary credits and short-term trade-related transactions | 4,021 | 3,880 |
| Undrawn formal standby facilities, credit lines and other commitments to lend | ||
| One year and over | 47,604 | 43,730 |
| Less than one year | 20,618 | 20,160 |
| Unconditionally cancellable | 115,168 | 113,584 |
| 187,411 | 181,354 | |
| Capital commitments | ||
| Contracted capital expenditure approved by the directors but not provided for in these accounts | 252 | 468 |
The Group's share of contingent liabilities and commitments relating to joint ventures is \$0.2 billion (31 December 2017: \$0.2 billion).
The Group has commitments totalling \$243 million to purchase aircraft for delivery in 2018 (31 December 2017: \$458 million).
As set out in note 19, the Group has contingent liabilities in respect of certain legal and regulatory matters for which it is not practicable to estimate the fi nancial impact as there are many factors that may affect the range of possible outcomes.
19. Legal and regulatory matters
Claims and other proceedings
The Group receives legal claims against it in a number of jurisdictions and is subject to regulatory investigations and proceedings arising in the normal course of business.
Apart from the matters described below, the Group currently considers none of these claims, investigations or proceedings to be material.
2012 Settlements with certain US authorities
In 2012, the Group reached settlements with certain US authorities regarding US sanctions compliance in the period 2001 to 2007, involving a Consent Order by the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS), a Cease and Desist Order by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Fed), Deferred Prosecution Agreements (DPAs) with each of the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the New York County District Attorney's Offi ce (DANY) and a Settlement Agreement with the Offi ce of Foreign Assets Control (together, the 'Settlements' and together the foregoing authorities, the 'US authorities'). In addition to the civil penalties totalling \$667 million, the terms of these Settlements include a number of conditions and ongoing obligations with regard to improving sanctions, Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) controls such as remediation programmes, reporting requirements, compliance reviews and programmes, banking transparency requirements, training measures, audit programmes, disclosure obligations and, in connection with the NYDFS Consent Order, the appointment of an independent monitor (Monitor). These obligations are managed under a programme of work referred to as the US Supervisory Remediation Program (SRP). The SRP comprises work streams designed to ensure compliance with the remediation requirements contained in all of the Settlements and the Group is engaged with all relevant authorities to implement these programmes and meet the Group's obligations under the Settlements.
On 9 December 2014, the Group announced that the DOJ, DANY and the Group had agreed to a three-year extension of the DPAs until 10 December 2017, resulting in the subsequent retention of the Monitor to evaluate and make recommendations regarding the Group's sanctions compliance programme. On 9 November 2017, the Group announced extension of the DPAs until 28 July 2018 and on 27 July 2018, the Group announced the further extension of the DPAs until 31 December 2018.
The November 2017 and July 2018 DPA extension agreements noted that the Group had taken a number of steps and made signifi cant progress to comply with the requirements of the DPA and enhance its sanctions compliance programme, but that the programme had not at the time reached the standard required by the DPA. The Group is committed to ongoing cooperation with the authorities and to continuing to implement a comprehensive programme of improvements to its fi nancial crime controls.
19. Legal and regulatory matters continued
2014 Settlement with NYDFS
On 19 August 2014, the Group announced that it had reached a fi nal settlement with the NYDFS regarding defi ciencies in the AML transaction surveillance system in its New York branch (the 'Branch'). The system, which is separate from the sanctions screening process, is one part of the Group's overall fi nancial crime controls and is designed to alert the Branch to unusual transaction patterns that require further investigation on a post-transaction basis.
The settlement provisions are summarised as follows:
- (i) A civil monetary penalty of \$300 million
- (ii) Enhancements to the transaction surveillance system at the Branch
- (iii) A two-year extension to the term of the Monitor (which, on 21 April 2017, was further extended to operate until 31 December 2018)
- (iv) A set of temporary remediation measures, which will remain in place until the transaction surveillance system's detection scenarios are operating to a standard approved by the Monitor. These temporary remediation measures include a restriction on opening, without prior approval of the NYDFS, a US dollar demand deposit account for any client that does not already have such an account with the Branch, a restriction on US dollar-clearing services for certain clients in Hong Kong and enhanced monitoring of certain high-risk clients in the UAE.
The remit of the SRP covers the management of these obligations.
Other ongoing investigations and reviews
The Group continues to cooperate with an investigation by the US authorities relating to historical violations of US sanctions laws and regulations. In contrast to the 2012 settlements, which focused on the period before the Group's 2007 decision to stop doing new business with known Iranian parties, the ongoing investigation is focused on examining the extent to which conduct and control failures permitted clients with Iranian interests to conduct transactions through Standard Chartered Bank after 2007 and the extent to which any such failures were shared with relevant US authorities in 2012.
The Group is engaged in ongoing discussions with the relevant US authorities regarding the resolution of this investigation, and such resolution may involve a range of civil and criminal penalties for sanctions compliance violations including substantial monetary penalties combined with other compliance measures such as remediation requirements and/or business restrictions.
It is not practicable to estimate the fi nancial impact of these matters as there are many factors that may affect the range of possible outcomes; however, the resulting fi nancial impact could be substantial.
Standard Chartered Bank is also engaged with the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to resolve the FCA investigation concerning Standard Chartered Bank's fi nancial crime controls. The investigation has been focused on the effectiveness and governance of those controls from 2009 through 2014 within the correspondent banking business carried out by Standard Chartered Bank's London branch, particularly in relation to the business carried on with respondent banks from outside the European Economic Area, and the effectiveness and governance of those controls in one of Standard Chartered Bank's overseas branches and the oversight exercised at Group level over those controls. Standard Chartered Bank has accepted that there were weaknesses in certain aspects of its relevant fi nancial crime controls during the relevant period of the investigation and is engaging with the FCA on terms of the resolution of the investigation. Resolution of the investigation could involve a substantial monetary penalty and other civil measures available to the FCA.
As part of their remit to oversee market conduct, regulators and other agencies in certain markets are conducting investigations or requesting reviews into a number of areas of regulatory compliance and market conduct, including sales and trading, involving a range of fi nancial products, and submissions made to set various market interest rates and other fi nancial benchmarks, such as foreign exchange. At relevant times, certain of the Group's branches and/or subsidiaries were (and are) participants in some of those markets, in some cases submitting data to bodies that set such rates and other fi nancial benchmarks. The Group continues to respond to inquiries and investigations by relevant authorities and is facing regulatory investigations and proceedings in various jurisdictions related to foreign exchange trading. There may be penalties or other fi nancial consequences to the Group as a result.
The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) in Hong Kong has been investigating Standard Chartered Securities (Hong Kong) Limited's (SCSHK) role as a joint sponsor of an initial public offering of China Forestry Holdings Limited, which was listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange in 2009. The SFC is pursuing disciplinary action against SCSHK, and there may be fi nancial consequences for SCSHK in connection with this action.
20. Subordinated liabilities and other borrowed funds
| 30.06.18 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USD \$million |
GBP \$million |
EUR \$million |
Others \$million |
Total \$million |
|||
| Fixed rate subordinated debt | 9,828 | 1,472 | 3,033 | 525 | 14,858 | ||
| Floating rate subordinated debt | 161 | 16 | – | 12 | 189 | ||
| Total | 9,989 | 1,488 | 3,033 | 537 | 15,047 | ||
| 31.12.17 | |||||||
| USD \$million |
GBP \$million |
EUR \$million |
Others \$million |
Total \$million |
|||
| Fixed rate subordinated debt | 9,497 | 3,297 | 3,136 | 1,057 | 16,987 | ||
| Floating rate subordinated debt | 161 | 16 | – | 12 | 189 | ||
| Total | 9,658 | 3,313 | 3,136 | 1,069 | 17,176 | ||
Redemptions and repurchases during the period
On 19 March 2018, Standard Chartered Bank Korea Limited redeemed KRW90 billion 6.05 per cent subordinated debt 2018 on its maturity.
On 3 April 2018, Standard Chartered Bank redeemed £700m 7.75 per cent subordinated notes 2018 on its maturity.
On 10 April 2018, Standard Chartered Bank exercised its right to redeem SGD450 million 5.25 per cent subordinated notes 2023 (callable 2018).
On 18 April 2018, Standard Chartered Bank exercised its right to redeem JPY10 billion 3.35 per cent subordinated notes 2023 (callable 2018).
On 14 June 2018, Standard Chartered Bank repurchased in part, £95.1 million of its £200 million 7.75 per cent subordinated notes (callable 2022).
On 14 June 2018, Standard Chartered PLC repurchased in part, £372.5 million of its £900 million 5.125 per cent subordinated debt 2034.
Issuances during the period
On 15 March 2018, Standard Chartered PLC issued \$500 million 4.866 per cent subordinated debt 2033 (callable 2028).
21. Share capital, other equity and reserves
Group and Company
| Number of ordinary shares millions |
Ordinary share capital1 \$million |
Share premium2 \$million |
Total share capital & share premium \$million |
Other equity instruments \$million |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At 1 January 2017 | 3,284 | 1,642 | 5,449 | 7,091 | 3,969 |
| Shares issued | 7 | 4 | – | 4 | 992 |
| At 30 June 2017 | 3,291 | 1,646 | 5,449 | 7,095 | 4,961 |
| Shares issued | 5 | 2 | – | 2 | – |
| At 31 December 2017 | 3,296 | 1,648 | 5,449 | 7,097 | 4,961 |
| Capitalised on scrip dividend | 2 | 1 | – | 1 | – |
| Shares issued | 6 | 3 | – | 3 | – |
| At 30 June 2018 | 3,304 | 1,652 | 5,449 | 7,101 | 4,961 |
1 Issued and fully paid ordinary shares of 50 cents each
2 Includes \$1,494 million of share premium relating to preference capital
21. Share capital, other equity and reserves continued
Ordinary share capital
In accordance with the Companies Act 2006, the Company does not have authorised share capital. The nominal value of each ordinary share is 50 cents.
On 17 May 2018, the Company issued 1,354,700 new ordinary shares instead of the 2017 fi nal dividend.
During the period, 6,203,572 shares were issued under employee share plans at prices between nil and 620 pence.
Preference share capital
At 30 June 2018, the Company has 15,000 \$5 non-cumulative redeemable preference shares in issue, with a premium of \$99,995 making a paid up amount per preference share of \$100,000. The preference shares are redeemable at the option of the Company and are classifi ed in equity.
The available profi ts of the Company are distributed to the holders of the issued preference shares in priority to payments made to holders of the ordinary shares and in priority to, or pari passu with, any payments to the holders of any other class of shares in issue. On a winding up, the assets of the Company are applied to the holders of the preference shares in priority to any payment to the ordinary shareholders and in priority to, or pari passu with, the holders of any other shares in issue, for an amount equal to any dividends accrued and/or payable and the nominal value of the shares together with any premium as determined by the Board. The redeemable preference shares are redeemable at the paid up amount (which includes premium) at the option of the Company in accordance with the terms of the shares. The holders of the preference shares are not entitled to attend or vote at any general meeting except where any relevant dividend due is not paid in full or where a resolution is proposed varying the rights of the preference shares.
Other equity instruments
On 2 April 2015, Standard Chartered PLC issued \$2,000 million Fixed Rate Resetting Perpetual Subordinated Contingent Convertible Securities as Additional Tier 1 (AT1) securities, raising \$1,987 million after issue costs. On 18 August 2016, Standard Chartered PLC issued a further \$2,000 million Fixed Rate Resetting Perpetual Subordinated Contingent Convertible Securities as AT1 securities, raising \$1,982 million after issue costs. On 18 January 2017, Standard Chartered PLC issued a further \$1,000 million Fixed Rate Resetting Perpetual Subordinated Contingent Convertible Securities as AT1 securities, raising \$992 million after issue costs. All the issuances were made for general business purposes and to increase the regulatory capital base of the Group.
The principal terms of the AT1 securities are described below:
- ¼ The securities are perpetual and redeemable, at the option of Standard Chartered PLC in whole but not in part, on the fi rst interest reset date and each date falling fi ve years after the fi rst reset date
- ¼ The securities are also redeemable for certain regulatory or tax reasons on any date at 100 per cent of their principal amount together with any accrued but unpaid interest up to (but excluding) the date fi xed for redemption. Any redemption is subject to Standard Chartered PLC giving notice to the relevant regulator and the regulator granting permission to redeem
- ¼ The interest rate in respect of the securities issued on 2 April 2015 for the period from (and including) the issue date to (but excluding) 2 April 2020 is a fi xed rate of 6.50 per cent per annum. The fi rst reset date for the interest rate is 2 April 2020 and each date falling fi ve, or an integral multiple of fi ve years after the fi rst reset date
- ¼ The interest rate in respect of the securities issued on 18 August 2016 for the period from (and including) the issue date to (but excluding) 2 April 2022 is a fi xed rate of 7.50 per cent per annum. The fi rst reset date for the interest rate is 2 April 2022 and each date falling fi ve years, or an integral multiple of fi ve years, after the fi rst reset date
- ¼ The interest rate in respect of the securities issued on 18 January 2017 for the period from (and including) the issue date to (but excluding) 2 April 2023 is a fi xed rate of 7.75 per cent per annum. The fi rst reset date for the interest rate is 2 April 2023 and each date falling fi ve years, or an integral multiple of fi ve years, after the fi rst reset date
- ¼ The interest on each of the securities will be payable semi-annually in arrears on 2 April and 2 October in each year, accounted for as a dividend
- ¼ Interest on the securities is due and payable only at the sole and absolute discretion of Standard Chartered PLC, subject to certain additional restrictions set out in the terms and conditions. Accordingly, Standard Chartered PLC may at any time elect to cancel any interest payment (or part thereof) which would otherwise be payable on any interest payment date
- ¼ The securities convert into ordinary shares of Standard Chartered PLC, at a pre-determined price, should the fully loaded Common Equity Tier 1 ratio of the Group fall below 7.0 per cent. Approximately 572 million ordinary shares would be required to satisfy the conversion of all the securities mentioned above
The securities rank behind the claims against Standard Chartered PLC of (a) unsubordinated creditors; (b) which are expressed to be subordinated to the claims of unsubordinated creditors of Standard Chartered PLC but not further or otherwise; or (c) which are, or are expressed to be, junior to the claims of other creditors of Standard Chartered PLC, whether subordinated or unsubordinated, other than claims which rank, or are expressed to rank, pari passu with, or junior to, the claims of holders of the AT1 securities in a winding–up occurring prior to the conversion trigger.
21. Share capital, other equity and reserves continued
Reserves
The constituents of the reserves are summarised as follows:
- ¼ The capital reserve represents the exchange difference on redenomination of share capital and share premium from sterling to US dollars in 2001. The capital redemption reserve represents the nominal value of preference shares redeemed
- ¼ Merger reserve represents the premium arising on shares issued using a cash box fi nancing structure, which required the Company to create a merger reserve under section 612 of the Companies Act 2006. Shares were issued using this structure in 2005 and 2006 to assist in the funding of certain acquisitions, in 2008, 2010 and 2015, for the shares issued by way of a rights issue, and for the shares issued in 2009 in the placing. The funding raised by the 2008 and 2010 rights issues and 2009 share issue was fully retained within the Company
- ¼ Own credit adjustment reserve represents the cumulative gains and losses on fi nancial liabilities designated at fair value through profi t or loss relating to own credit. Following the Group's decision to early apply this IFRS 9 requirement the cumulative OCA component of fi nancial liabilities designated at fair value through profi t or loss has been transferred from opening retained earnings to the OCA reserve. Gains and losses on fi nancial liabilities designated at fair value through profi t or loss relating to own credit in the year have been taken through other comprehensive income into this reserve. On derecognition of applicable instruments the balance of any OCA will not be recycled to the income statement, but will be transferred within equity to retained earnings
- ¼ Fair value through OCI debt reserve represents the unrealised fair value gains and losses in respect of fi nancial assets classifi ed as fair value through OCI, net of expected credit losses and taxation. Gains and losses are deferred in this reserve and are reclassifi ed to the income statement when the underlying asset is sold, matures or becomes impaired. Fair value through OCI equity reserve represents unrealised fair value gains and losses in respect of fi nancial assets classifi ed as fair value through OCI, net of taxation. Gains and losses are recorded in this reserve and never recycled to the income statement
- ¼ Cash fl ow hedge reserve represents the effective portion of the gains and losses on derivatives that meet the criteria for these types of hedges. Gains and losses are deferred in this reserve and are reclassifi ed to the income statement when the underlying hedged item affects profi t and loss or when a forecast transaction is no longer expected to occur
- ¼ Translation reserve represents the cumulative foreign exchange gains and losses on translation of the net investment of the Group in foreign operations. Since 1 January 2004, gains and losses are deferred to this reserve and are reclassifi ed to the income statement when the underlying foreign operation is disposed. Gains and losses arising from derivatives used as hedges of net investments are netted against the foreign exchange gains and losses on translation of the net investment of the foreign operations
- ¼ Retained earnings represents profi ts and other comprehensive income earned by the Group and Company in the current and prior periods, together with the after tax increase relating to equity-settled share options, less dividend distributions and own shares held (treasury shares).
A substantial part of the Group's reserves are held in overseas subsidiary undertakings and branches, principally to support local operations or to comply with local regulations. The maintenance of local regulatory capital ratios could potentially restrict the amount of reserves which can be remitted. In addition, if these overseas reserves were to be remitted, further unprovided taxation liabilities might arise.
As at 30 June 2018, the distributable reserves of Standard Chartered PLC (the Company) were \$15.1 billion (31 December 2017: \$15.1 billion). These comprised retained earnings and \$12.5 billion of the merger reserve account. Distribution of reserves is subject to maintaining minimum capital requirements.
Own shares
Computershare Trustees (Jersey) Limited is the trustee of the 2004 Employee Benefi t Trust ('2004 Trust') and Ocorian Trustees (Jersey) Limited (formerly known as Bedell Trustees Limited) is the trustee of the 1995 Employees' Share Ownership Plan Trust ('1995 Trust'). The 2004 Trust is used in conjunction with the Group's employee share schemes and the 1995 Trust is used for the delivery of other employee share-based payments (such as upfront shares and fi xed pay allowances). Group companies fund these trusts from time to time to enable the trustees to acquire shares to satisfy these arrangements.
Except as disclosed, neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries has bought, sold or redeemed any securities of the Company listed on The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited during the period. Details of the shares purchased and held by the trusts are set out below.
| 1995 Trust | 2004 Trust | Total | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of shares | 30.06.18 | 31.12.17 | 30.06.17 | 30.06.18 | 31.12.17 | 30.06.17 | 30.06.18 | 31.12.17 | 30.06.17 |
| Shares purchased during the period |
– | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Market price of shares purchased (\$million) |
– | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Shares held at the end of the period |
1,336,879 | 3,769,011 | 3,769,011 | 16,755 | 18,004 | 34,262 | 1,353,634 | 3,787,015 | 3,803,273 |
| Maximum number of shares held during the period |
3,787,015 | 3,803,273 | 6,182,467 |
22. Retirement benefi t obligations
Retirement benefi t obligations comprise:
| 30.06.18 \$million |
31.12.17 \$million |
30.06.17 \$million |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Total market value of assets | 2,506 | 2,592 | 2,391 |
| Present value of the plans' liabilities | (2,838) | (3,035) | (2,919) |
| Defi ned benefi t plans obligation | (332) | (443) | (528) |
| Defi ned contribution plans obligation | (16) | (12) | (26) |
| Net obligation | (348) | (455) | (554) |
Retirement benefi t charge comprises:
| 6 months ended 30.06.18 |
6 months ended 31.12.17 |
6 months ended 30.06.17 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| \$million | \$million | \$million | |
| Defi ned benefi t plans | 41 | 63 | 35 |
| Defi ned contribution plans | 146 | 138 | 121 |
| Charge against profi t (note 6) | 187 | 201 | 156 |
| The pension cost for defi ned benefi t plans was: | |||
| Current service cost | 35 | 37 | 36 |
| Past service cost and curtailments | – | 6 | (9) |
| Gain on settlements | – | 7 | – |
| Interest income on pension plan assets | (35) | (34) | (32) |
| Interest on pension plan liabilities | 41 | 47 | 40 |
| Total charge to profi t before deduction of tax | 41 | 63 | 35 |
| Losses/(returns) on plan assets excluding interest income | 31 | (80) | (33) |
| (Gains)/losses on liabilities | (136) | 19 | 62 |
| Total (gains)/ losses recognised directly in statement of comprehensive income before tax | (105) | (61) | 29 |
| Deferred taxation | 6 | 19 | 16 |
| Total losses after tax | (99) | (42) | 45 |
23. Related party transactions
Directors, connected persons or offi cers
As at 30 June 2018, Standard Chartered Bank had in place a charge over \$73 million (31 December 2017: \$75 million, 30 June 2017: \$72 million) of cash assets in favour of the independent trustee of its employer-fi nanced retirement benefi t scheme.
There were no changes in the related party transactions descibed in the Annual Report 2017 that have had a material effect on the fi nancial position or performance of the Group in the period ended 30 June 2018. All related party transactions that have taken place in the period ended 30 June 2018 were similar in nature to those disclosed in the Annual Report 2017.
Associate and joint ventures
| 30.06.18 | 31.12.17 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| China Bohai Bank \$million |
Clifford Capital \$million |
PT Bank Permata \$million |
China Bohai Bank \$million |
Clifford Capital \$million |
PT Bank Permata \$million |
|
| Assets | ||||||
| Loans and advances | – | – | 61 | – | 50 | 95 |
| Debt securities | – | 27 | – | – | 27 | – |
| Derivative assets | 2 | – | – | 1 | – | – |
| Total assets | 2 | 27 | 61 | 1 | 77 | 95 |
| Liabilities | ||||||
| Deposits | 576 | – | 73 | 219 | – | 29 |
| Debt securities issued | 15 | – | – | 15 | – | – |
| Total liabilities | 591 | – | 73 | 234 | – | 29 |
| Loan commitments and other guarantees | – | 50 | – | – | – | – |
| Total net income | 3 | – | 2 | 5 | – | 6 |
24. Post balance sheet events
An interim dividend for half year 2018 of 6 cents per ordinary share was declared by the directors on 31 July 2018.
25. Corporate governance
The directors confi rm that, throughout the period, the Company has complied with the code provisions set out in the Corporate Governance Code contained in Appendix 14 of the Hong Kong Listing Rules. The directors also confi rm that the announcement of these results has been reviewed by the Company's Audit Committee. The Company confi rms that it has adopted a code of conduct regarding securities transactions by directors on terms no less exacting than the required standard set out in Appendix 10 of the Hong Kong Listing Rules and that having made specifi c enquiry of all directors, the directors of the Company have complied with the required standards of the adopted code of conduct throughout the period.
As previously announced, since 31 December 2017, there has been one change to a position on the Board. Christine Hodgson, Chairman of the Remuneration Committee and member of the Audit, Governance and Nomination, Brand, Values and Conduct and Board Financial Crime Risk Committees, took over from Naguib Kheraj as Senior Independent Director on 1 February 2018. Naguib Kheraj remains as Deputy Chairman, Chairman of the Audit Committee and member of the Board Risk, Board Financial Crime Risk, Remuneration and Governance and Nomination Committees. Biographies for each of the directors and a list of the committees' membership can be found at sc.com.
In compliance with Rule 13.51B(1) of the Hong Kong Listing Rules, the Company confi rms that Dr Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, Independent Non-Executive Director, was appointed to the Board of Twitter, Inc. as an independent director with effect from 19 July 2018.
26. Statutory accounts
The information in this half year report is unaudited and does not constitute statutory accounts within the meaning of section 434 of the Companies Act 2006. This document was approved by the Board on 31 July 2018. The statutory accounts for the year ended 31 December 2017 have been audited by the Company's auditors and delivered to the Registrar of Companies in England and Wales. The report of the auditors was (i) unqualifi ed, (ii) did not include a reference to any matters to which the auditors drew attention by way of emphasis without qualifying their report, and (iii) did not contain a statement under section 498 of the Companies Act 2006.
27. Transition to IFRS 9 Financial Instruments
Balance sheet
| IAS 39 31 December 2017 |
Classifi cation & measurement |
Expected credit losses |
Other impacts | IFRS 9 1 January 2018 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| \$million | \$million | \$million | \$million | \$million | |
| Cash and balances at central banks | 58,864 | – | – | – | 58,864 |
| Financial assets held at fair value through profi t or loss | 27,564 | 47,076 | – | – | 74,640 |
| Derivative fi nancial instruments | 47,031 | – | – | – | 47,031 |
| Loans and advances to banks | 57,494 | (293) | (7) | – | 57,194 |
| Loans and advances to customers1 | 248,707 | (951) | (815) | – | 246,941 |
| Reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending |
54,275 | (44,608) | – | – | 9,667 |
| Investment securities | 117,025 | (1,193) | (19) | – | 115,813 |
| Other assets | 33,490 | – | – | – | 33,490 |
| Current tax assets | 491 | – | – | 1 | 492 |
| Prepayments and accrued income | 2,307 | – | – | – | 2,307 |
| Interests in associates and joint ventures | 2,307 | – | – | (52) | 2,255 |
| Goodwill and intangible assets | 5,013 | – | – | – | 5,013 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 7,211 | – | – | – | 7,211 |
| Deferred tax assets | 1,177 | – | – | 125 | 1,302 |
| Assets classifi ed as held for sale | 545 | – | – | – | 545 |
| Total assets | 663,501 | 31 | (841) | 74 | 662,765 |
| Deposits by banks | 30,945 | – | – | – | 30,945 |
| Customer accounts | 370,509 | – | – | – | 370,509 |
| Repurchase agreements and other similar secured borrowing | 39,783 | (38,144) | – | – | 1,639 |
| Financial liabilities held through profi t or loss | 16,633 | 38,140 | – | – | 54,773 |
| Derivative fi nancial instruments | 48,101 | – | – | – | 48,101 |
| Debt securities in issue | 46,379 | – | – | – | 46,379 |
| Other liabilities | 35,257 | – | – | – | 35,257 |
| Current tax liabilities | 376 | – | – | (10) | 366 |
| Accruals and deferred income | 5,493 | – | – | – | 5,493 |
| Subordinated liabilities and other borrowed funds | 17,176 | – | – | – | 17,176 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 404 | – | – | (37) | 367 |
| Provisions for liabilities and charge1 | 183 | – | 176 | – | 359 |
| Retirement benefi t obligations | 455 | – | – | – | 455 |
| Total liabilities | 611,694 | (4) | 176 | (47) | 611,819 |
| Share capital and share premium account | 7,097 | – | – | – | 7,097 |
| Other reserves | 12,767 | (165) | 65 | (7) | 12,660 |
| Retained earnings1 | 26,641 | 200 | (1,074) | 128 | 25,895 |
| Total parent company shareholders' equity | 46,505 | 35 | (1,009) | 121 | 45,652 |
| Other equity instruments | 4,961 | – | – | – | 4,961 |
| Total equity excluding non-controlling interests | 51,466 | 35 | (1,009) | 121 | 50,613 |
| Non-controlling interests | 341 | – | (8) | – | 333 |
| Total equity | 51,807 | 35 | (1,017) | 121 | 50,946 |
| Total equity and liabilities | 663,501 | 31 | (841) | 74 | 662,765 |
1 The Group's initial estimate of credit impairment provisions on adoption of IFRS 9 was \$6,720 million. Following refi nement of the Group's expected loss models, the estimate of the opening credit impairment provisions has been revised down by \$222 million to \$6,498 million, and the net expected credit loss of \$(1,296) million adjusted against retained earnings has similarly decreased by \$222 million to \$(1,074) million
27. Transition to IFRS 9 Financial Instruments continued
Statement of changes in equity
| Share | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| capital and | Fair value | Parent | ||||||||||
| share | Capital and | Own credit | Available | through | Cash fl ow | company | Non | |||||
| premium | merger | adjustment | for-sale | OCI | hedge | Translation | Retained | shareholders' | Other equity | controlling | ||
| account \$million |
reserves \$million |
reserve \$million |
reserve \$million |
reserve \$million |
reserve \$million |
reserve \$million |
earnings \$million |
equity \$million |
instruments \$million |
interests \$million |
Total \$million |
|
| As at | ||||||||||||
| 31 December 2017 | 7,097 | 17,129 | 54 | 83 | – | (45) | (4,454) | 26,641 | 46,505 | 4,961 | 341 | 51,807 |
| Net impact of: | – | – | – | (83) | (82) | – | – | 200 | 35 | – | – | 35 |
| IFRS 9 reclassifi cations1 | – | – | – | (83) | (86) | – | – | 169 | – | – | – | – |
| IFRS 9 re-measurements2 |
– | – | – | – | 4 | – | – | 31 | 35 | – | – | 35 |
| Expected credit loss, net3 |
– | – | – | – | 65 | – | – | (1,074) | (1,009) | – | (8) | (1,017) |
| Tax impact4 | – | – | – | – | (6) | – | – | 179 | 173 | – | – | 173 |
| Impact of IFRS 9 on share of joint ventures and associates, net of tax |
– | – | – | – | (1) | – | – | (51) | (52) | – | – | (52) |
| Estimated IFRS 9 | ||||||||||||
| transition adjustments | – | – | – | (83) | (24) | – | – | (746) | (853) | – | (8) | (861) |
| As at 1 January 2018 | 7,097 | 17,129 | 54 | – | (24) | (45) | (4,454) | 25,895 | 45,652 | 4,961 | 333 50,946 |
1 Available-for-sale category has been removed under IFRS 9. Unrealised gains and losses have been transferred to fair value through other comprehensive income (FVOCI) reserves, or retained earnings where the instruments are held as FVTPL. The FVOCI reserve includes a \$187 million loss in respect of equity securities designated as FVOCI, partly offset by \$18 million gain on debt securities designated as FVOCI
2 The remeasurement impact of fi nancial assets that are now measured at fair value under IFRS 9 (page 137)
3 Impact from adopting expected credit losses. Gross impact is estimated at \$1,082 million (comprising \$1,074 million in retained earnings and \$8 million in non-controlling interests). As FVOCI debt instruments are held at fair value on the balance sheet, the expected credit loss charged to retained earnings is recognised as a credit to the FVOCI reserve. The net FVOCI reserve relating to FVOCI debt instruments will be recycled to the income statement on disposal of the instruments
4 Tax of \$173 million has been credited to reserves as a result of transition to IFRS 9. Of this, deferred tax of \$142 million has been credited to retained earnings, and is provided on additional deductible temporary differences that have arisen from loss provisions due to initial adoption of the expected credit loss approach
Impact of moving from an incurred loss approach to an expected credit loss approach
| 1 January 2018 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expected credit loss per IFRS 9 | |||||||
| Portfolio impairment provisions \$million |
Individual impairment provisions \$million |
Total \$million |
Stage 1 \$million |
Stage 2 \$million |
Stage 3 \$million |
Total \$million |
Increase/ (decrease) \$million |
| 156 | 3,466 | 3,622 | 105 | 394 | 3,433 | 3,932 | 310 |
| 208 | 275 | 483 | 382 | 178 | 389 | 949 | 466 |
| 99 | 1,431 | 1,530 | 39 | 93 | 1,369 | 1,501 | (29) |
| 2 | 67 | 69 | 8 | 1 | 91 | 100 | 31 |
| – | – | – | 4 | – | – | 4 | 4 |
| 465 | 5,239 | 5,704 | 538 | 666 | 5,282 | 6,486 | 782 |
| 1 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 12 | 7 |
| – | 77 | 77 | 6 | 16 | 77 | 99 | 22 |
| – | 114 | 114 | 3 | 16 | 213 | 232 | 118 |
| – | – | – | 23 | 42 | – | 65 | 65 |
| 466 | 5,434 | 5,900 | 576 | 742 | 5,576 | 6,894 | 994 |
| Loss allowances per IAS 39 |
1 Includes both drawn and undrawn commitments
27. Transition to IFRS 9 Financial Instruments continued
Movement in loss provisions
| Loans to customers \$ million |
Provisions for liabilities and charges |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt securities \$ million |
FVOCI debt securities \$ million |
Loans to banks \$ million |
Undrawn commitments \$ million |
Guarantees \$ million |
Total \$ million |
||
| Total IAS 39 loss provisions | 114 | – | 5 | 5,7021 | 21 | 77 | 5,900 |
| Loss provisions reclassifi ed to FVTPL | (109) | – | – | (122) | – | – | (231) |
| Modifi cation losses netted against gross exposure | – | – | – | (65) | – | – | (65) |
| Adjusted IAS 39 loss provisions | 5 | – | 5 | 5,515 | 2 | 77 | 5,604 |
| Additional expected credit loss provisions | 19 | 65 | 7 | 815 | 154 | 22 | 1,082 |
| Total IFRS 9 impairment provisions | 24 | 65 | 12 | 6,3302 | 1562 | 99 | 6,686 |
| Estimated net expected credit loss movement | (90) | 65 | 7 | 628 | 154 | 22 | 786 |
1 Total IAS 39 loss allowances (\$5,704 million) applied to loans and advances to customers as previously reported (page 138)
2 Total IFRS 9 expected credit losses (\$6,486 million) applied to loans and advances to customers (page 138)
Impact on Non-performing loans to customers and banks1
| Corporate & Institutional Banking |
Retail Banking |
Commercial Banking |
Private Banking |
Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| \$million | \$million | \$million | \$million | \$million | |
| Gross | |||||
| At 31 December 2017 | 5,957 | 489 | 2,026 | 207 | 8,679 |
| Modifi ed loans | (39) | – | (26) | – | (65) |
| Performing forborne (impaired) | – | 329 | – | – | 329 |
| Reclassifi ed | (62) | – | (40) | – | (102) |
| At 1 January 2018 (stage 3) | 5,856 | 818 | 1,960 | 207 | 8,841 |
| Credit impairment provisions | |||||
| At 31 December 2017 (IAS 39 IIP) | 3,468 | 2152 | 1,431 | 67 | 5,181 |
| Modifi ed loans | (39) | – | (26) | – | (65) |
| Performing forborne (impaired) | – | 60 | – | – | 60 |
| Reclassifi ed to FVTPL | (81) | – | (40) | – | (121) |
| Additional expected credit loss | 1 | 114 | 6 | – | 121 |
| GSAM multiple scenario provisions | 88 | – | (2) | 24 | 110 |
| At 1 January 2018 (stage 3) | 3,437 | 3892 | 1,369 | 91 | 5,286 |
| IAS 39 PIP at 31 December 2017 | 157 | 208 | 99 | 2 | 466 |
| Collateral at 31 December 2017 | 1,111 | 218 | 277 | 203 | 1,809 |
| Non-performing cover ratios: | |||||
| At 31 December 2017 (IAS 39) | 61% | 87% | 75% | 33% | 65% |
| At 31 December 2017 (IAS 39, excluding PIP) | 58% | 44% | 71% | 32% | 60% |
| At 1 January 2018 (IFRS 9) | 59% | 48% | 70% | 44% | 60% |
| At 31 December 2017 (IAS 39, including collateral) | 77% | 89% | 84% | 100% | 81% |
| At 1 January 2018 (IFRS 9, including collateral) | 78% | 74% | 84% | 100% | 80% |
| Of the above, included in the liquidation portfolio: | |||||
| Gross | 1,945 | – | 125 | 156 | 2,226 |
| Credit impairment provisions (IAS 39) | 1,388 | – | 123 | 62 | 1,573 |
| Additional provisions (IFRS 9) | 29 | – | – | 24 | 53 |
| At 1 January 2018 (Stage 3) | 1,417 | – | 123 | 86 | 1,626 |
| Non-performing cover ratios: | |||||
| At 31 December 2017 (IAS 39) | 71% | – | 98% | 40% | 71% |
| At 1 January 2018 (IFRS 9) | 73% | – | 98% | 55% | 73% |
| At 31 December 2017 (IAS 39, including collateral) | 84% | – | 98% | 100% | 86% |
| At 1 January 2018 (IFRS 9, including collateral) | 85% | – | 98% | 100% | 88% |
1 Includes FVTPL impaired loans
2 Under IAS 39, Retail Banking non-performing loans excluded those impaired loans classifi ed as performing
Supplementary fi nancial information
1. Analysis of underlying performance by key country
The following tables provide information for key countries in which the Group operates. The numbers are prepared on a management view. Refer to note 2 for details.
| 6 months ended 30.06.18 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hong Kong \$million |
Korea \$million |
China \$million |
Singapore \$million |
India \$million |
UAE \$million |
UK \$million |
US \$million |
|
| Operating income | 1,849 | 534 | 422 | 845 | 482 | 357 | 441 | 333 |
| Operating expenses | (961) | (404) | (333) | (512) | (344) | (233) | (330) | (321) |
| Operating profi t before impairment losses and taxation |
888 | 130 | 89 | 333 | 138 | 124 | 111 | 12 |
| Credit impairment | (15) | (3) | (9) | (56) | (29) | (56) | (45) | (29) |
| Other impairment | (45) | 5 | – | (10) | (2) | – | 24 | – |
| Profi t from associates and joint ventures | – | – | 156 | – | – | – | – | – |
| Underlying profi t/(loss) before taxation | 828 | 132 | 236 | 267 | 107 | 68 | 90 | (17) |
| Total assets employed | 153,021 | 52,536 | 31,639 | 83,211 | 27,370 | 18,477 | 140,227 | 52,578 |
| Of which: loans and advances to customers |
73,390 | 33,289 | 13,959 | 46,022 | 15,958 | 11,100 | 37,828 | 11,173 |
| Total liabilities employed | 135,252 | 46,942 | 28,693 | 82,305 | 18,049 | 14,373 | 154,925 | 45,610 |
| Of which: customer accounts | 112,948 | 38,029 | 21,492 | 59,619 | 14,397 | 11,890 | 94,960 | 18,190 |
| 6 months ended 31.12.17 | ||||||||
| Hong Kong | Korea | China | Singapore | India | UAE | UK | US | |
| \$million | \$million | \$million | \$million | \$million | \$million | \$million | \$million | |
| Operating income | 1,714 | 464 | 366 | 686 | 447 | 356 | 347 | 333 |
| Operating expenses | (966) | (411) | (341) | (535) | (353) | (268) | (327) | (316) |
| Operating profi t before impairment losses and taxation |
748 | 53 | 25 | 151 | 94 | 88 | 20 | 17 |
| Credit impairment | 3 | (58) | (9) | (117) | (108) | (61) | (49) | 4 |
| Other impairment | (27) | – | – | – | – | – | (14) | (2) |
| Profi t from associates and joint ventures | – | – | 106 | – | – | – | – | – |
| Underlying profi t/(loss) before taxation | 724 | (5) | 122 | 34 | (14) | 27 | (43) | 19 |
| Total assets employed | 140,431 | 51,822 | 33,243 | 86,431 | 26,315 | 20,268 | 119,272 | 45,338 |
| Of which: loans and advances to customers |
67,292 | 34,891 | 12,899 | 45,495 | 16,515 | 11,328 | 34,694 | 10,092 |
| Total liabilities employed | 128,577 | 45,966 | 28,151 | 84,288 | 17,614 | 15,142 | 128,270 | 39,646 |
| Of which: customer accounts | 108,352 | 36,213 | 21,854 | 59,905 | 14,141 | 11,692 | 80,972 | 11,831 |
| 6 months ended 30.06.17 | ||||||||
| Hong Kong \$million |
Korea \$million |
China \$million |
Singapore \$million |
India \$million |
UAE \$million |
UK \$million |
US \$million |
|
| Operating income | 1,670 | 503 | 341 | 733 | 561 | 377 | 400 | 342 |
| Operating expenses | (906) | (366) | (311) | (481) | (305) | (256) | (285) | (325) |
| Operating profi t before impairment losses and taxation |
764 | 137 | 30 | 252 | 256 | 121 | 115 | 17 |
| Credit impairment | (51) | 5 | (8) | (101) | (143) | (33) | (1) | (61) |
| Other impairment | (51) | (3) | – | – | (3) | – | – | – |
| Profi t from associates and joint ventures | – | – | 123 | – | – | – | – | – |
| Underlying profi t/(loss) before taxation | 662 | 139 | 145 | 151 | 110 | 88 | 114 | (44) |
| Total assets employed | 140,865 | 45,754 | 28,977 | 85,902 | 27,835 | 19,906 | 113,672 | 42,455 |
| Of which: loans and advances to customers |
65,950 | 31,186 | 11,964 | 43,071 | 15,740 | 11,076 | 29,527 | 9,829 |
| Total liabilities employed | 126,456 | 39,654 | 25,034 | 84,745 | 18,625 | 14,572 | 110,911 | 62,008 |
| Of which: customer accounts | 104,577 | 31,142 | 20,011 | 59,807 | 14,064 | 11,207 | 56,809 | 38,109 |
2. Analysis of underlying performance by Retail Banking and Commercial Banking segments
Retail Banking
| 6 months ended 30.06.18 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greater China & North Asia \$million |
ASEAN & South Asia \$million |
Africa & Middle East \$million |
Europe & Americas \$million |
Total \$million |
|
| Operating income | 1,485 | 712 | 404 | 19 | 2,620 |
| Operating expenses | (972) | (559) | (338) | (15) | (1,884) |
| Operating profi t before impairment losses and taxation | 513 | 153 | 66 | 4 | 736 |
| Credit impairment | (31) | (65) | (23) | – | (119) |
| Underlying profi t before taxation | 482 | 88 | 43 | 4 | 617 |
| Restructuring | (1) | (3) | – | – | (4) |
| Statutory profi t/(loss) before taxation | 481 | 85 | 43 | 4 | 613 |
| Loans and advances to customers | 66,897 | 28,128 | 5,973 | 532 | 101,530 |
| Customer accounts | 90,840 | 31,292 | 8,987 | 1,135 | 132,254 |
| 6 months ended 31.12.17 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greater China & North Asia \$million |
ASEAN & South Asia \$million |
Africa & Middle East \$million |
Europe & Americas \$million |
Total \$million |
|
| Operating income | 1,349 | 667 | 403 | 19 | 2,438 |
| Operating expenses | (954) | (571) | (324) | (13) | (1,862) |
| Operating profi t before impairment losses and taxation | 395 | 96 | 79 | 6 | 576 |
| Credit impairment | (95) | (69) | (39) | – | (203) |
| Other impairment | (1) | – | – | – | (1) |
| Underlying profi t before taxation | 299 | 27 | 40 | 6 | 372 |
| Restructuring | (8) | (1) | (14) | – | (23) |
| Statutory profi t/(loss) before taxation | 291 | 26 | 26 | 6 | 349 |
| Loans and advances to customers | 68,121 | 28,170 | 6,233 | 489 | 103,013 |
| Customer accounts | 88,850 | 30,544 | 8,950 | 1,192 | 129,536 |
| 6 months ended 30.06.17 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greater China & North Asia \$million |
ASEAN & South Asia \$million |
Africa & Middle East \$million |
Europe & Americas \$million |
Total \$million |
||||
| Operating income | 1,335 | 635 | 410 | 16 | 2,396 | |||
| Operating expenses | (885) | (514) | (314) | (10) | (1,723) | |||
| Operating profi t before impairment losses and taxation | 450 | 121 | 96 | 6 | 673 | |||
| Credit impairment | (55) | (77) | (40) | – | (172) | |||
| Underlying profi t before taxation | 395 | 44 | 56 | 6 | 501 | |||
| Restructuring | (1) | 3 | 2 | – | 4 | |||
| Statutory profi t/(loss) before taxation | 394 | 47 | 58 | 6 | 505 | |||
| Loans and advances to customers | 65,249 | 26,823 | 6,028 | 391 | 98,491 | |||
| Customer accounts | 83,937 | 29,564 | 9,071 | 1,204 | 123,776 |
2. Analysis of underlying performance by Retail Banking and Commercial Banking segments continued
Commercial Banking
| 6 months ended 30.06.18 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greater China & North Asia \$million |
ASEAN & South Asia \$million |
Africa & Middle East \$million |
Total \$million |
|||
| Operating income | 295 | 263 | 148 | 706 | ||
| Operating expenses | (198) | (160) | (102) | (460) | ||
| Operating profi t before impairment losses and taxation | 97 | 103 | 46 | 246 | ||
| Credit impairment | (17) | (25) | (64) | (106) | ||
| Underlying profi t before taxation | 80 | 78 | (18) | 140 | ||
| Restructuring | (1) | – | – | (1) | ||
| Statutory profi t/(loss) before taxation | 79 | 78 | (18) | 139 | ||
| Loans and advances to customers | 14,628 | 9,281 | 4,662 | 28,571 | ||
| Customer accounts | 20,496 | 9,282 | 2,918 | 32,696 |
| 6 months ended 31.12.17 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greater China & North Asia \$million |
ASEAN & South Asia \$million |
Africa & Middle East \$million |
Total \$million |
||||
| Operating income | 263 | 262 | 148 | 673 | |||
| Operating expenses | (193) | (160) | (101) | (454) | |||
| Operating profi t before impairment losses and taxation | 70 | 102 | 47 | 219 | |||
| Credit impairment | 32 | (97) | (60) | (125) | |||
| Underlying profi t before taxation | 102 | 5 | (13) | 94 | |||
| Restructuring | (1) | (3) | (3) | (7) | |||
| Statutory profi t/(loss) before taxation | 101 | 2 | (16) | 87 | |||
| Loans and advances to customers | 14,179 | 9,439 | 4,490 | 28,108 | |||
| Customer accounts | 19,879 | 10,959 | 3,042 | 33,880 |
| 6 months ended 30.06.17 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greater China & North Asia \$million |
ASEAN & South Asia \$million |
Africa & Middle East \$million |
Total \$million |
|||
| 264 | 242 | 154 | 660 | |||
| (193) | (144) | (90) | (427) | |||
| 71 | 98 | 64 | 233 | |||
| (20) | (13) | (9) | (42) | |||
| (3) | – | – | (3) | |||
| 48 | 85 | 55 | 188 | |||
| (3) | (2) | (1) | (6) | |||
| 45 | 83 | 54 | 182 | |||
| 13,355 | 9,104 | 4,339 | 26,798 | |||
| 19,645 | 9,116 | 3,325 | 32,086 | |||
3. Analysis of operating income by product and segment
The following tables provide a breakdown of the Group's underlying operating income by product and client segment.
| Corporate & Institutional Banking \$million |
Retail Banking \$million |
Commercial Banking \$million |
Private Banking \$million |
Central & other items \$million |
Total \$million |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transaction Banking | 1,430 | 10 | 400 | – | – | 1,840 |
| Trade | 385 | 10 | 194 | – | – | 589 |
| Cash Management and Custody | 1,045 | – | 206 | – | – | 1,251 |
| Financial Markets | 1,248 | – | 153 | – | – | 1,401 |
| Foreign Exchange | 439 | – | 91 | – | – | 530 |
| Rates | 281 | – | 17 | – | – | 298 |
| Commodities | 92 | – | 12 | – | – | 104 |
| Credit and Capital Markets | 187 | – | 6 | – | – | 193 |
| Capital Structuring Distribution Group | 133 | – | 14 | – | – | 147 |
| Other Financial Markets | 116 | – | 13 | – | – | 129 |
| Corporate Finance | 616 | – | 49 | – | – | 665 |
| Lending and Portfolio Management | 174 | – | 104 | – | – | 278 |
| Wealth Management | – | 820 | 1 | 170 | – | 991 |
| Retail Products | – | 1,793 | 2 | 101 | – | 1,896 |
| CCPL and other unsecured lending | – | 696 | – | – | – | 696 |
| Deposits | – | 739 | 3 | 83 | – | 825 |
| Mortgage and Auto | – | 314 | – | 18 | – | 332 |
| Other Retail Products | – | 44 | (1) | – | – | 43 |
| Treasury | – | – | – | – | 628 | 628 |
| Other1 | (17) | (3) | (3) | – | (27) | (50) |
| Total underlying operating income | 3,451 | 2,620 | 706 | 271 | 601 | 7,649 |
1 Other includes GSAM
| 6 months ended 31.12.17 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate & Institutional Banking \$million |
Retail Banking \$million |
Commercial Banking \$million |
Private Banking \$million |
Central & other items \$million |
Total \$million |
|
| Transaction Banking | 1,336 | 10 | 386 | – | – | 1,732 |
| Trade | 401 | 10 | 193 | – | – | 604 |
| Cash Management and Custody | 935 | – | 193 | – | – | 1,128 |
| Financial Markets | 1,067 | – | 132 | – | – | 1,199 |
| Foreign Exchange | 367 | – | 79 | – | – | 446 |
| Rates | 232 | – | 14 | – | – | 246 |
| Commodities | 67 | – | 10 | – | – | 77 |
| Credit and Capital Markets | 168 | – | 7 | – | – | 175 |
| Capital Structuring Distribution Group | 113 | – | 10 | – | – | 123 |
| Other Financial Markets | 120 | – | 12 | – | – | 132 |
| Corporate Finance | 746 | – | 45 | – | – | 791 |
| Lending and Portfolio Management | 134 | – | 105 | – | – | 239 |
| Wealth Management | – | 728 | 2 | 155 | – | 885 |
| Retail Products | – | 1,701 | 3 | 103 | – | 1,807 |
| CCPL and other unsecured lending | – | 682 | 1 | – | – | 683 |
| Deposits | – | 622 | 3 | 85 | – | 710 |
| Mortgage and Auto | – | 358 | – | 17 | – | 375 |
| Other Retail Products | – | 39 | (1) | 1 | – | 39 |
| Treasury | – | – | – | – | 455 | 455 |
| Other | (5) | (1) | – | – | (35) | (41) |
| Total underlying operating income | 3,278 | 2,438 | 673 | 258 | 420 | 7,067 |
6 months ended 30.06.18
3. Analysis of operating income by product and segment continued
| 6 months ended 30.06.17 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate & Institutional Banking \$million |
Retail Banking \$million |
Commercial Banking \$million |
Private Banking \$million |
Central & other items \$million |
Total \$million |
|||
| Transaction Banking | 1,228 | 8 | 361 | – | – | 1,597 | ||
| Trade | 392 | 8 | 193 | – | – | 593 | ||
| Cash Management and Custody | 836 | – | 168 | – | – | 1,004 | ||
| Financial Markets | 1,199 | – | 146 | – | – | 1,345 | ||
| Foreign Exchange | 412 | – | 85 | – | – | 497 | ||
| Rates | 271 | – | 18 | – | – | 289 | ||
| Commodities | 69 | – | 11 | – | – | 80 | ||
| Credit and Capital Markets | 197 | – | 4 | – | – | 201 | ||
| Capital Structuring Distribution Group | 141 | – | 15 | – | – | 156 | ||
| Other Financial Markets | 109 | – | 13 | – | – | 122 | ||
| Corporate Finance | 644 | – | 41 | – | – | 685 | ||
| Lending and Portfolio Management | 150 | – | 107 | – | – | 257 | ||
| Wealth Management | – | 710 | 2 | 144 | – | 856 | ||
| Retail Products | – | 1,675 | 3 | 98 | – | 1,776 | ||
| CCPL and other unsecured lending | – | 684 | – | – | – | 684 | ||
| Deposits | – | 623 | 3 | 83 | – | 709 | ||
| Mortgage and Auto | – | 334 | – | 15 | – | 349 | ||
| Other Retail Products | – | 34 | – | – | – | 34 | ||
| Treasury | – | – | – | – | 688 | 688 | ||
| Other | (3) | 3 | – | – | 18 | 18 | ||
| Total underlying operating income | 3,218 | 2,396 | 660 | 242 | 706 | 7,222 |
Convenience translation of selected fi nancial statements into Indian Rupees
In compliance with regulation 70 read with schedule IV part B of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) regulations, 2015, as amended, the Consolidated fi nancial statements (pages 145 to 150) are presented in Indian rupees (INR) using a US dollar/Indian rupee exchange rate of 68.5753 as at 30 June 2018 as published by the Reserve Bank of India. Amounts have been translated using the said exchange rate including totals and sub-totals and any discrepancies in any table between totals and sums of the amounts listed are due to rounding.
4. Condensed consolidated interim income statement (translated to INR)
For the six months ended 30 June 2018
| 6 months ended 30.06.18 |
6 months ended 31.12.17 |
6 months ended 30.06.17 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Rs. million | Rs. million | Rs. million | |
| Interest income | 564,169 | 524,601 | 465,283 |
| Interest expense | (265,112) | (235,556) | (193,314) |
| Net interest income | 299,057 | 289,045 | 271,971 |
| Fees and commission income | 144,968 | 134,476 | 135,848 |
| Fees and commission expense | (16,801) | (12,481) | (17,007) |
| Net fee and commission income | 128,167 | 121,995 | 118,841 |
| Net trading income | 66,244 | 37,991 | 66,724 |
| Other operating income | 29,556 | 44,985 | 37,648 |
| Non-interest income | |||
| Operating income | 523,024 | 494,016 | 495,182 |
| Staff costs | (245,362) | (239,671) | (223,761) |
| Premises costs | (25,579) | (29,967) | (26,470) |
| General administrative expenses | (55,409) | (80,302) | (57,329) |
| Depreciation and amortisation | (29,213) | (30,447) | (26,401) |
| Operating expenses | (355,563) | (380,387) | (333,961) |
| Operating profi t before impairment losses and taxation | 167,461 | 113,629 | 161,221 |
| Credit impairment | (14,675) | (48,483) | (44,917) |
| Other impairment | |||
| Goodwill | – | (21,944) | – |
| Other | (3,429) | (5,897) | (6,378) |
| Profi t from associates and joint ventures | 11,521 | 8,023 | 10,355 |
| Profi t before taxation | 160,878 | 45,328 | 120,281 |
| Taxation | (51,638) | (41,077) | (37,579) |
| Profi t for the period | 109,240 | 4,251 | 82,702 |
| Profi t attributable to: | |||
| Non-controlling interests | 2,263 | 2,674 | 686 |
| Parent company shareholders | 106,977 | 1,577 | 82,016 |
| Profi t for the period | 109,240 | 4,251 | 82,702 |
| Rupees | Rupees | Rupees | |
| Earnings per share: | |||
| Basic earnings/(loss) per ordinary share | 27.9 | (4.1) | 20.2 |
| Diluted earnings/(loss) per ordinary share | 27.6 | (4.1) | 20.0 |
5. Condensed consolidated interim statement of comprehensive income (translated to INR)
For the six months ended 30 June 2018
| 6 months ended 30.06.18 |
6 months ended 31.12.17 |
6 months ended 30.06.17 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Rs. million | Rs. million | Rs. million | |
| Profi t for the period | 109,240 | 4,251 | 82,702 |
| Other comprehensive income/(loss) | |||
| Items that will not be reclassifi ed to income statement: | 17,349 | 7,063 | (23,384) |
| Own credit gains/(losses) on fi nancial liabilities designated at fair value through profi t or loss | 9,326 | 4,183 | (21,258) |
| Equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income | 1,303 | – | – |
| Actuarial gains/(losses) on retirement benefi t obligations | 7,200 | 4,183 | (1,989) |
| Taxation relating to components of other comprehensive income | (480) | (1,303) | (137) |
| Items that may be reclassifi ed subsequently to income statement: | (56,644) | 36,276 | 68,781 |
| Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations: | |||
| Net (losses)/gains taken to equity | (69,124) | 51,089 | 61,169 |
| Net gains/(losses) on net investment hedges | 14,812 | (12,138) | (7,612) |
| Share of other comprehensive income/(loss) from associates and joint ventures | 1,097 | 960 | (1,029) |
| Debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income/ | |||
| Available for sale investments: | |||
| Net valuation (losses)/gains taken to equity | (8,161) | 3,703 | 21,601 |
| Reclassifi ed to income statement | 892 | (8,983) | (6,995) |
| Net impact of expected credit losses | (549) | – | – |
| Cash fl ow hedges: | |||
| Net gains taken to equity | 3,360 | 206 | 2,194 |
| Reclassifi ed to income statement | 343 | 754 | – |
| Taxation relating to components of other comprehensive income | 686 | 686 | (549) |
| Other comprehensive (loss)/income for the period, net of taxation | (39,295) | 43,340 | 45,397 |
| Total comprehensive income for the period | 69,945 | 47,590 | 128,099 |
| Total comprehensive income attributable to: | |||
| Non-controlling interests | 1,714 | 2,537 | 892 |
| Parent company shareholders | 68,231 | 45,053 | 127,207 |
| 69,945 | 47,590 | 128,099 |
6. Condensed consolidated interim balance sheet (translated to INR)
As at 30 June 2018
| 30.06.18 Rs. million |
31.12.17 Rs. million |
|
|---|---|---|
| Assets | ||
| Cash and balances at central banks | 3,991,974 | 4,036,616 |
| Financial assets held at fair value through profi t or loss | 5,477,041 | 1,890,210 |
| Derivative fi nancial instruments | 3,550,829 | 3,225,165 |
| Loans and advances to banks | 3,812,992 | 3,942,668 |
| Loans and advances to customers | 17,493,559 | 17,055,157 |
| Reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending | 876,461 | 3,721,924 |
| Investment securities | 8,440,316 | 8,025,024 |
| Other assets | 2,679,100 | 2,296,587 |
| Current tax assets | 25,099 | 33,670 |
| Prepayments and accrued income | 165,815 | 158,203 |
| Interests in associates and joint ventures | 160,809 | 158,203 |
| Goodwill and intangible assets | 341,094 | 343,768 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 502,383 | 494,496 |
| Deferred tax assets | 88,462 | 80,713 |
| Assets classifi ed as held for sale | 45,260 | 37,374 |
| Total assets | 47,651,193 | 45,499,780 |
| Liabilities | ||
| Deposits by banks | 2,113,216 | 2,122,063 |
| Customer accounts | 26,203,102 | 25,407,766 |
| Repurchase agreements and other similar secured borrowing | 402,057 | 2,728,131 |
| Financial liabilities held at fair value through profi t or loss | 4,339,034 | 1,140,613 |
| Derivative fi nancial instruments | 3,631,885 | 3,298,541 |
| Debt securities in issue | 3,167,905 | 3,180,454 |
| Other liabilities | 2,780,317 | 2,417,759 |
| Current tax liabilities | 42,654 | 25,784 |
| Accruals and deferred income | 325,870 | 376,684 |
| Subordinated liabilities and other borrowed funds | 1,031,853 | 1,177,849 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 31,202 | 27,704 |
| Provisions for liabilities and charges | 27,430 | 12,549 |
| Retirement benefi t obligations | 23,864 | 31,202 |
| Total liabilities | 44,120,388 | 41,947,100 |
| Equity | ||
| Share capital and share premium account | 486,953 | 486,679 |
| Other reserves | 822,149 | 875,501 |
| Retained earnings | 1,858,802 | 1,826,915 |
| Total parent company shareholders' equity | 3,167,905 | 3,189,094 |
| Other equity instruments | 340,202 | 340,202 |
| Total equity excluding non-controlling interests | 3,508,107 | 3,529,296 |
| Non-controlling interests | 22,698 | 23,384 |
| Total equity | 3,530,805 | 3,552,681 |
| Total equity and liabilities | 47,651,193 | 45,499,780 |
7. Condensed consolidated interim statement of changes in equity (translated to INR)
For the year ended 30 June 2018
| Share capital and share premium account Rs. million |
Capital and merger reserves1 Rs. million |
Own credit adjust ment reserve Rs. million |
Available -for-sale reserve Rs. million |
Fair value through other compre hensive income reserve – debt Rs. million |
Fair value through other compre hensive income reserve – equity Rs. million |
Cash fl ow hedge reserve Rs. million |
Translation reserve Rs. million |
Retained earnings Rs. million |
Parent company share holders' equity Rs. million |
Other equity instru ments Rs. million |
Non controlling interests Rs. million |
Total Rs. million |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As at 31 December 2017 486,679 1,174,626 |
3,703 | 5,692 | – | – | (3,086) (305,434) 1,826,915 | 3,189,094 340,202 | 23,384 | 3,552,681 | |||||
| IFRS 9 Reclassifi cations2 |
– | – | – | (5,692) | (8,983) | 3,086 | – | – | 11,589 | – | – | – | – |
| IFRS 9 Re-measurements2 |
– | – | – | – | – | 274 | – | – | 2,126 | 2,400 | – | – | 2,400 |
| Expected credit loss, net |
– | – | – | – | 4,457 | – | – | – | (73,650)3 | (69,192) | – | (549) | (69,741) |
| Tax impact | – | – | – | – | (754) | 343 | – | – | 12,275 | 11,864 | – | – | 11,864 |
| Impact of IFRS 9 on share of joint ventures and associates, net of tax |
– | – | – | – | – | (69) | – | – | (3,497) | (3,566) | – | – | (3,566) |
| IFRS 9 Transition adjustments |
– | – | – | (5,692) | (5,280) | 3,634 | – | – | (51,157) | (58,495) | – | (549) | (59,043) |
| As at 1 January 2018 |
486,679 1,174,626 | 3,703 | – | (5,280) | 3,634 | (3,086)(305,434) 1,775,757 3,130,600 340,202 | 22,836 3,493,637 | ||||||
| Profi t for the period | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 106,977 | 106,977 | – | 2,263 | 109,240 |
| Other comprehensive income/(loss) |
– | – | 9,052 | – | (7,063) | 2,537 | 3,154 | (53,694) | 7,2694 | (38,745) | – | (549) | (39,294) |
| Distributions | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | (1,852) | (1,852) |
| Shares issued, net of expenses |
274 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 274 | – | – | 274 |
| Net own shares adjustment |
– | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 480 | 480 | – | – | 480 |
| Share option expense, net of taxation |
– | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 6,652 | 6,652 | – | – | 6,652 |
| Dividends net of scrip5 |
– | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | (38,676) | (38,676) | – | – | (38,676) |
| Other movements | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 343 | 343 | – | – | 343 |
| As at 30 June 2018 486,953 1,174,626 | 12,755 | – | (12,344) | 6,172 | 69 | (359,129) 1,858,802 3,167,905 340,202 | 22,698 3,530,805 |
1 Includes capital reserve of Rs. 343 million, capital redemption reserve of Rs. 891 million and merger reserve of Rs. 1,173,392 million
2 As per Note 27 Transition to IFRS 9 Financial Instruments
3 The Group's initial estimate of credit impairment on adoption of IFRS 9 was Rs. 460,826 million. Following refi nement of the Group's expected loss models, the estimate of the opening credit impairment has been revised down by Rs. 15,224 million to Rs. 445,602 million, and the net expected credit loss of Rs. (88,874) million adjusted against retained earnings has similarly decreased by Rs. 15,224 million
4 Comprises actuarial gain/(loss), net of taxation and share from associates and joint ventures Rs. 7,269 million (Rs. 6,583 million for the six months ended 31 December 2017 and Rs. (3,154) million for the six months ended 30 June 2017)
5 Comprises dividends paid net of scrip Rs. 23,796 million (2017: Rs. nil) and dividends on preferences shares classifi ed as equity and Additional Tier 1 securities Rs. 14,881 million (Rs. 15,087 million for the six months ended 31 December 2017 and Rs. 15,429 million for the six months ended 30 June 2017)
7. Condensed consolidated interim statement of changes in equity (translated to INR) continued
| Share capital and share premium account Rs. million |
Capital and merger reserves1 Rs. million |
Own credit adjust ment reserve Rs. million |
Available -for-sale reserve Rs. million |
Fair value through other compre hensive income reserve – debt Rs. million |
Fair value through other compre hensive income reserve – equity Rs. million |
Cash fl ow hedge reserve Rs. million |
Translation reserve Rs. million |
Retained earnings Rs. million |
Parent company share holders' equity Rs. million |
Other equity instru ments Rs. million |
Non controlling interests Rs. million |
Total Rs. million |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At 1 January 2017 | 486,267 1,174,626 | 19,818 | (274) | – | – | (5,829) (398,080) 1,766,020 3,042,549 | 272,175 | 22,013 | 3,336,737 | ||||
| Profi t for the period | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 82,016 | 82,016 | – | 686 | 82,702 |
| Other comprehensive (loss)/income |
– | – | (20,298) | 13,166 | – | – | 1,920 | 53,557 | (3,154)2 | 45,191 | – | 206 | 45,397 |
| Distributions | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | (3,566) | (3,566) |
| Shares issued, net of expenses |
274 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 274 | – | – | 274 |
| Other equity instruments issued, net of expenses |
– | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 68,027 | – | 68,027 |
| Net own shares adjustment |
– | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 549 | 549 | – | – | 549 |
| Share option expense, net of taxation |
– | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 4,663 | 4,663 | – | – | 4,663 |
| Dividends3 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | (15,429) | (15,429) | – | – | (15,429) |
| Other movements4 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1,166 | 1,166 | – | 1,646 | 2,812 |
| At 30 June 2017 | 486,542 1,174,626 | (480) | 12,892 | – | – | (3,909) (344,522) 1,835,829 | 3,160,978 340,202 | 20,984 | 3,522,165 | ||||
| Profi t for the period | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1,577 | 1,577 | – | 2,674 | 4,252 |
| Other comprehensive income/(loss) |
– | – | 4,183 | (7,200) | – | – | 823 | 39,088 | 6,5832 | 43,477 | – | (137) | 43,340 |
| Distributions | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 69 | 69 |
| Shares issued, net of expenses |
137 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 137 | – | – | 137 |
| Net own shares adjustment |
– | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 137 | 137 | – | – | 137 |
| Share option expense, net of taxation |
– | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 3,909 | 3,909 | – | – | 3,909 |
| Dividends3 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | (15,087) | (15,087) | – | – | (15,087) |
| Other movements5 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | (6,035) | (6,035) | – | (206) | (6,240) |
| As at 31 December 2017 486,679 1,174,626 |
3,703 | 5,692 | – | – | (3,086) (305,434) 1,826,915 3,189,094 340,202 | 23,384 3,552,681 |
1 Includes capital reserve of Rs. 343 million, capital redemption reserve of Rs. 891 million and merger reserve of Rs. 1,173,392 million
2 Comprises actuarial gain/(loss), net of taxation and share from associates and joint ventures of Rs. 6,583 million for the six months ended 31 December 2017 and Rs. (3,154) million for the six months ended 30 June 2017
3 Comprises dividends on preference shares classifi ed as equity and Additional Tier 1 securities Rs. 15,087 million for the six months ended 31 December 2017 and Rs. 15,429 million for the six months ended 30 June 2017
4 Mainly due to additional share capital issued including the premium by Nepal to its non-controlling interests of Rs. 2,194 million and Rs. 617 million with respect to an acquisition
5 Mainly due to other equity adjustments of Rs. 6,172 million
8. Condensed consolidated interim cash fl ow statement (translated to INR)
For the six months ended 30 June 2018
| 6 months ended 30.06.18 Rs. million |
6 months ended 31.12.17 Rs. million |
6 months ended 30.06.17 Rs. million |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash fl ows from operating activities: | |||
| Profi t before taxation | 160,878 | 45,328 | 120,281 |
| Adjustments for non-cash items and other adjustments included within income statement | 81,125 | 151,346 | 70,907 |
| Change in operating assets | (1,977,917) | (457,672) | (476,667) |
| Change in operating liabilities | 2,742,601 | 233,430 | 165,609 |
| Contributions to defi ned benefi t schemes | (2,606) | (6,378) | (3,429) |
| UK and overseas taxes paid | (22,630) | (31,270) | (31,476) |
| Net cash from /(used in) operating activities | 981,451 | (65,215) | (154,774) |
| Cash fl ows from investing activities: | |||
| Purchase of property, plant and equipment | (4,389) | (7,406) | (3,909) |
| Disposal of property, plant and equipment | 206 | 137 | 1,852 |
| Acquisition of investment in subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures, net of cash acquired | – | – | (3,017) |
| Dividends received from subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures | 206 | 69 | 69 |
| Disposal of subsidiaries | – | (1,646) | 1,646 |
| Purchase of investment securities | (9,868,191) | (9,041,928) | (9,143,282) |
| Disposal and maturity of investment securities | 9,247,173 | 8,658,935 | 9,260,889 |
| Net cash (used in)/from investing activities | (624,995) | (391,839) | 114,246 |
| Cash fl ows from fi nancing activities: | |||
| Issue of ordinary and preference share capital, net of expenses | 274 | 137 | 274 |
| Exercise of share options | 480 | 137 | 549 |
| Issue of Additional Tier 1 capital, net of expenses | – | – | 68,027 |
| Gross proceeds from issue of subordinated liabilities | 34,288 | – | – |
| Interest paid on subordinated liabilities | (16,595) | (33,328) | (17,624) |
| Repayment of subordinated liabilities | (153,746) | (204,629) | – |
| Proceeds from issue of senior debts | 131,733 | 139,276 | 17,898 |
| Repayment of senior debts | (168,970) | (204,149) | (81,262) |
| Interest paid on senior debts | (15,224) | (37,579) | (23,864) |
| (Repayment to)/investment from non-controlling interests | – | (206) | 1,646 |
| Dividends paid to non-controlling interests and preference shareholders | (16,664) | (15,018) | (18,995) |
| Dividends paid to ordinary shareholders | (23,864) | – | – |
| Net cash used in fi nancing activities | (228,288) | (355,357) | (53,352) |
| Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 128,167 | (812,412) | (93,880) |
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period | 5,981,892 | 6,761,250 | 6,650,227 |
| Effect of exchange rate movements on cash and cash equivalents | (53,832) | 33,053 | 204,903 |
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period | 6,056,227 | 5,981,892 | 6,761,250 |
Summary of signifi cant differences between Indian GAAP and IFRS
The condensed consolidated interim fi nancial statements of the Group for the six months ended 30 June 2018 with comparatives as at 31 December 2017 and 30 June 2017 are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and IFRS Interpretations Committee interpretations as adopted by the European Union.
IFRS differs in certain signifi cant respects from Indian Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Such differences involve methods for measuring the amounts shown in the fi nancial statements of the Group, as well as additional disclosures required by Indian GAAP.
Set out below are descriptions of certain accounting differences between IFRS and Indian GAAP that could have a signifi cant effect on profi t or loss attributable to parent company shareholders for the period ended 30 June 2018 and 31 December 2017 and 30 June 2017 and total parent company shareholders' equity as at the same dates. This section does not provide a comprehensive analysis of such differences. In particular, this description considers only those Indian GAAP pronouncements for which adoption or application is required in fi nancial statements for years ended on or prior to 30 June 2018. The Group has not quantifi ed the effect of differences between IFRS and Indian GAAP, nor prepared consolidated fi nancial statements under Indian GAAP, nor undertaken a reconciliation of IFRS and Indian GAAP fi nancial statements. Had the Group undertaken any such quantifi cation or preparation or reconciliation, other potentially signifi cant accounting and disclosure differences may have come to its attention which are not identifi ed below. Accordingly, the Group does not provide any assurance that the differences identifi ed below represent all the principal differences between IFRS and Indian GAAP relating to the Group. Furthermore, no attempt has been made to identify future differences between IFRS and Indian GAAP. In addition no attempt has been made to identify all differences between IFRS and Indian GAAP that may affect the fi nancial statements as a result of transaction or events that may occur in the future.
In making an investment decision, potential investors should consult their own professional advisors for an understanding of the differences between IFRS and Indian GAAP and how those differences may have affected the fi nancial results of the Group. The summary does not purport to be complete and is subject to and qualifi ed in its entirety by reference to the pronouncements of the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), together with the pronouncements of the Indian accounting profession.
Changes in accounting policy
IFRS (IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors)
Changes in accounting policy are applied retrospectively. Comparatives are restated and the effect of period(s) not presented is adjusted against opening retained earnings of the earliest year presented. Policy changes made on the adoption of a new standard are made in accordance with that standard's transitional provisions.
Indian GAAP (AS 5 Net Profi t or Loss for the Period, Prior Period Items and Changes in Accounting Policies)
The cumulative amount of the change is included in the income statement for the period in which the change is made except as specifi ed in certain standards (transitional provision) where the change during the transition period resulting from adoption of the standard has to be adjusted against opening retained earnings and the impact disclosed.
Where a change in accounting policy has a material effect in the current period, the amount by which any item in the fi nancial statements is affected by such change should also be disclosed to the extent ascertainable. Where such an amount is not ascertainable, this fact should be indicated.
Functional and presentation currency
IFRS (IAS 21 The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates)
An entity may present its fi nancial statements in any currency (or currencies). If the presentation currency differs from the entity's functional currency, it translates its results and fi nancial position into the presentation currency.
Monetary assets and liabilities are translated at the closing rate at the date of that statement of fi nancial position. Income statement items are translated at the exchange rate at the date of transaction or at average rates. The functional currency is the currency of the primary economic environment in which an entity operates. The functional and presentation currency of the Group is US dollars.
Indian GAAP (AS 11 The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates)
There is no concept of functional or presentation currency. Entities in India have to prepare their fi nancial statements in Indian rupees.
A foreign currency transaction should be recorded, on initial recognition in the reporting currency, by applying to the foreign currency amount, the exchange rate between the reporting currency and the foreign currency at the date of the transaction.
At each balance sheet date:
- ¼ Foreign currency monetary items should be reported using the closing rate
- ¼ Non-monetary items which are carried in terms of historical cost denominated in a foreign currency should be reported using the exchange rate at the date of the transaction
- ¼ Non-monetary items which are carried at fair value or other similar valuation denominated in a foreign currency should be reported using the exchange rates that existed when the values were determined
Consolidation
IFRS (IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements)
Entities are consolidated when the Group controls an entity. The Group controls an entity when it is exposed to, or has rights to direct relevant activities, or has right to variable returns from its involvement with the entity and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the investee. This also includes entities where control is not derived through voting rights such as structured entities.
Indian GAAP (AS 21 Consolidated Financial Statements)
Guidance is based on the power through the ability to govern the fi nancial and operating policies of an entity so as to obtain benefi ts while not taking into consideration potential voting rights.
No specifi c guidance is given by Indian GAAP on consolidation of structured entities.
Business combinations
IFRS (IFRS 3 Business Combinations)
All business combinations are treated as acquisitions. Assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities acquired are measured at their fair values with the excess over this fair value when compared with the acquisition cost recognised as goodwill.
For acquisitions occurring on or after 1 January 2004, IFRS 3 requires that, when assessing the value of the assets of an acquired entity, certain identifi able intangible assets must be recognised and; if considered to have a fi nite life, amortised through the income statement over an appropriate period.
Business combinations continued
Adjustments to provisional fair values are permitted provided those adjustments are made within 12 months from the date of acquisition, with a corresponding adjustment to goodwill. After re-assessment of respective fair values of net assets acquired, any excess of acquirer's interest in the net fair values of acquirer's identifi able assets is recognised immediately in the income statement.
The Group's policy for non-controlling interests is generally not to recognise non-controlling interests at their fair value, but to recognise them based on their proportionate share of the fair value of the identifi able net assets acquired.
Indian GAAP (AS 14 Accounting for Amalgamations)
Treatment of a business combination depends on whether the acquired entity is held as a subsidiary, whether it is an amalgamation or whether it is an acquisition of a business. For an entity acquired and held as a subsidiary, the business combination is accounted for as an acquisition. The assets and liabilities acquired are incorporated at their existing carrying amounts.
For an amalgamation of an entity, either pooling of interests or acquisition accounting may be used. The assets and liabilities amalgamated are incorporated at their existing carrying amounts or, alternatively, if acquisition accounting is adopted, the consideration can be allocated to individual identifi able assets (which may include intangible assets) and liabilities on the basis of their fair values.
Adjustments to the value of acquired or amalgamated balances are not permitted after initial recognition. Any excess of acquirer's interest in the net fair values of acquirer's identifi able assets is recognised as capital reserve, which is neither amortised nor available for distribution to shareholders. However, in case of an amalgamation accounted under the purchase method, the fair value of intangible assets with no active market is reduced to the extent of capital reserve, if any, arising on the amalgamation. Minority interests arising on the acquisition of a subsidiary are recognised at their share of the historical book value.
Goodwill
IFRS (IFRS 3 Business Combinations and IAS 38 Intangible Assets)
IFRS 3 requires that goodwill arising on all acquisitions by the Group and associated undertakings is capitalised but not amortised and is subject to an annual review for impairment. Goodwill is tested annually for impairment. Any impairment losses recognised may not be reversed in subsequent accounting periods.
Indian GAAP (AS 14 Accounting for Amalgamations and AS 26 Intangible Assets)
Goodwill arising on amalgamations is capitalised and amortised over useful life not exceeding fi ve years, unless a longer period can be justifi ed. For goodwill arising on acquisition of a subsidiary or a business, there is no specifi c guidance. In practice, there is either no amortisation or amortisation not exceeding 10 years. Goodwill is reviewed for impairment whenever an indicator of impairment exists. Impairment losses recognised may be reversed under exceptional circumstances only in subsequent accounting periods through the income statement.
Acquired and internally generated intangible assets
IFRS (IAS 38 Intangible Assets)
Intangible assets are recognised if they are deemed separable and arise from contractual or other legal rights. Assets with a fi nite useful life are amortised on a systematic basis over their useful life. An asset with an indefi nite useful life should be tested for impairment annually.
Indian GAAP (AS 26 Intangible Assets)
Intangible assets are capitalised if specifi c criteria are met and are amortised over their useful life, generally not exceeding 10 years. The recoverable amount of an intangible asset that is not available for use or is being amortised over a period exceeding 10 years should be reviewed at least at each fi nancial year end even if there is no indication that the asset is impaired.
Property, plant and equipment
IFRS (IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment, IAS 23 Borrowing Costs)
The Group's policy is to hold all property, plant, aviation, shipping and equipment fi xed assets at cost less depreciation and consequently tangible fi xed assets are not subject to revaluation. Fixed assets are, however, subject to impairment testing.
Foreign exchange gains or losses relating to the procurement of property, plant and equipment can be capitalised as part of the asset. Depreciation is recorded over the asset's estimated useful life. Borrowing costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition or construction of an asset must be capitalised as part of that asset.
Indian GAAP (AS 10 Fixed Assets, AS 16 Borrowing Cost and AS 6 Depreciation Accounting)
Fixed assets are recorded at historical costs or revalued amounts. Relevant borrowing costs are capitalised if certain criteria in AS 16 are met. Depreciation is recorded over the asset's useful life. Schedule II (Part C) of the Companies Act 2013 and Banking Regulations prescribe minimum rates of depreciation and these are typically used as the basis for determining useful life.
Recognition and measurement of fi nancial instruments
IFRS 9 Financial Instruments
Classifi cation and measurement Accounting policy
The Group classifi es its fi nancial assets into the following measurement categories: amortised cost; fair value through other comprehensive income; and fair value through profi t or loss. Financial liabilities are classifi ed as either amortised cost, or held at fair value through profi t or loss. Management determines the classifi cation of its fi nancial assets and liabilities at initial recognition of the instrument or, where applicable, at the time of reclassifi cation.
Financial assets held at amortised cost and fair value through other comprehensive income
Debt instruments held at amortised cost or held at fair value through comprehensive income (FVOCI) have contractual terms that give rise to cash fl ows that are solely payments of principal and interest (SPPI characteristics). Principal is the fair value of the fi nancial asset at initial recognition but this may change over the life of the instrument as amounts are repaid. Interest consists of consideration for the time value of money, for the credit risk associated with the principal amount outstanding during a particular period and for other basic lending risks and costs, as well as a profi t margin.
Whether fi nancial assets are held at amortised cost or at FVOCI depends on the objectives of the business models under which the assets are held. A business model refers to how the Group manages fi nancial assets to generate cash fl ows.
The Group makes an assessment of the objective of a business model in which an asset is held at the individual product business line, and where applicable within business lines depending on the way the business is managed and information is provided to management.
Recognition and measurement of fi nancial instruments continued
Financial assets that have SPPI characteristics and which are held within a business model whose objective is to hold fi nancial assets to collect contractual cash fl ows ('hold to collect') are recorded at amortised cost.
Conversely, fi nancial assets that have SPPI characteristics but are held within a business model whose objective is achieved by both collecting contractual cash fl ows and selling fi nancial assets ('hold to collect and sell') are classifi ed as FVOCI.
Equity instruments designated as FVOCI
Non-trading equity instruments acquired for strategic purposes rather than capital gain may be irrevocably designated at initial recognition at FVOCI on an instrument-by-instrument basis. Gains and losses arising from changes in the fair value of these instruments, including foreign exchange gains and losses, are recognised directly in equity and are never reclassifi ed to profi t or loss, even on derecognition.
Financial assets and liabilities held at fair value through profi t or loss
Financial assets that are not held at amortised cost or which are not held at fair value through other comprehensive income are held at fair value through profi t or loss. Financial assets and liabilities held at fair value through profi t or loss are either mandatorily classifi ed fair value through profi t or loss or irrevocably designated at fair value through profi t or loss at initial recognition.
Mandatorily classifi ed at fair value through profi t or loss
Financial assets and liabilities that are mandatorily held at fair value through profi t or loss include:
- ¼ Financial assets and liabilities held for trading, which are those acquired principally for the purpose of selling in the short term
- ¼ Hybrid fi nancial assets that contain one or more embedded derivatives
- ¼ Financial assets that would otherwise be measured at amortised cost or FVOCI but which do not have SPPI characteristics
- ¼ Equity instruments that have not been designated as held at FVOCI
- ¼ Financial liabilities that constitute contingent consideration in a business combination
Designated at fair value through profi t or loss
Financial assets and liabilities may be designated at fair value through profi t or loss when the designation eliminates or signifi cantly reduces a measurement or recognition inconsistency that would otherwise arise from measuring assets or liabilities on a different basis ('accounting mismatch').
Financial liabilities may also be designated at fair value through profi t or loss where they are managed on a fair value basis or have a bifurcately embedded derivative where the Group is not able to separately value the embedded derivative component.
Financial liabilities held at amortised cost
Financial liabilities that are not fi nancial guarantees or loan commitments and that are not classifi ed as fi nancial liabilities held at fair value through profi t or loss are classifi ed as fi nancial liabilities held at amortised cost.
Financial guarantee contracts and loan commitments
Financial guarantee contracts and loan commitments issued at below market interest rates are initially recognised as liabilities at fair value and subsequently at the higher of the expected credit loss provision,
and the amount initially recognised less the cumulative amount of income recognised in accordance with the principles of IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers.
Fair value of fi nancial assets and liabilities
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date in the principal market for the asset or liability, or in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market to which the Group has access at that date. The fair value of a liability includes the risk that the bank will not be able to honour its obligations.
Initial recognition
Purchases and sales of fi nancial assets and liabilities held at fair value through profi t or loss, and debt securities classifi ed as fi nancial assets held at FVOCI are initially recognised on the trade-date (the date on which the Group commits to purchase or sell the asset). Loans and advances and other fi nancial assets held at amortised cost are recognised on settlement date (the date on which cash is advanced to the borrowers).
All fi nancial instruments are initially recognised at fair value, which is normally the transaction price, plus directly attributable transaction costs for fi nancial assets that are not subsequently measured at fair value through profi t or loss.
Subsequent measurement
Financial assets and fi nancial liabilities held at amortised cost Financial assets and fi nancial liabilities held at amortised cost are subsequently carried at amortised cost using the effective interest method. Foreign exchange gains and losses are recognised in the income statement.
Financial assets held at FVOCI
Debt instruments held at FVOCI are subsequently carried at fair value, with all unrealised gains and losses arising from changes in fair value (including any related foreign exchange gains or losses) recognised in other comprehensive income and accumulated in a separate component of equity. Foreign exchange gains and losses on the amortised cost are recognised in income. Changes in expected credit losses are recognised in the profi t or loss and are accumulated in a separate component of equity.
Equity investments designated at FVOCI are subsequently carried at fair value with all unrealised gains and losses arising from changes in fair value (including any related foreign exchange gains or losses) recognised in other comprehensive income and accumulated in a separate component of equity.
Financial assets and liabilities mandatorily held at fair value through profi t or loss and fi nancial assets designated at fair value through profi t or loss are subsequently carried at fair value, with gains and losses arising from changes in fair value recorded in the net trading income line in the income statement unless the instrument is part of a cash fl ow hedging relationship. Contractual interest income on fi nancial assets held at fair value through profi t or loss is recognised as interest income in a separate line in the income statement.
Financial liabilities designated at fair value through profi t or loss
Financial liabilities designated at fair value through profi t or loss are held at fair value, with changes in fair value recognised in the net trading income line in the profi t or loss, other than that attributable to changes in credit risk. Fair value changes attributable to credit risk are recognised in other comprehensive income and recorded in a separate category of reserves unless this is expected to create or enlarge an accounting mismatch, in which case the entire change in fair value of the fi nancial liability designated fair value through profi t or loss is recognised in profi t or loss.
Recognition and measurement of fi nancial instruments continued
Indian GAAP (AS 13 Investments)
AS 13 requires investments to be categorised as follows:
- ¼ Current investments, which are those readily realisable and intended to be held for less than one year, are carried at the lower of cost and fair value, with changes in fair value taken directly to profi t or loss
- ¼ Long-term investments, which are those investments not classifi ed as current, are carried at cost unless there is a permanent diminution in value, in which case a provision for diminution is required to be made by the entity
For investments, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) outlines similar classifi cations to IFRS, but the classifi cation criteria and measurement requirements differ from those set out in IFRS. Financial liabilities are usually carried at cost. There is no ability to designate instruments at fair value.
Derivatives
IFRS (IFRS 9/IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement)
IFRS 9 requires that all derivatives be recognised on balance sheet at fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are not hedges are reported in the income statement. Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated as hedges are either offset against the change in fair value of the hedged asset or liability through earnings, or recognised directly in equity until the hedged item is recognised in earnings, depending on the nature of the hedge. The ineffective portion of the hedge's change in fair value is immediately recognised in earnings. A derivative may only be classifi ed as a hedge if an entity meets stringent qualifying criteria in respect of documentation and hedge effectiveness.
The Group continues to apply the hedge accounting requirements of IAS 39 rather than the requirements of IFRS 9.
Indian GAAP
Foreign exchange contracts held for trading or speculative purposes are carried at fair value, with gains and losses recognised in the income statement. In the absence of specifi c guidance, equity options are carried at the lower of cost or market value.
For banks, there are guidelines prescribed by RBI on measurement and accounting of interest rate swaps and forward rate agreements entered into for hedging purposes.
Impairment of fi nancial assets
Under IFRS 9 the impairment of fi nancial assets is as follows:
Measurement
Expected credit losses are computed as unbiased, probabilityweighted amounts which are determined by evaluating a range of reasonably possible outcomes, the time value of money, and considering all reasonable and supportable information including that which is forward looking.
For material portfolios, the estimate of expected cash shortfalls is determined by multiplying the probability of default (PD) with the loss given default (LGD) with the expected exposure at the time of default (EAD). For less material Retail loan portfolios, the Group has adopted simplifi ed approaches based on historical roll rates or loss rates.
For credit-impaired fi nancial instruments, the estimate of cash shortfalls may require the use of expert credit judgement. As a practical expedient, the Group may also measure credit impairment on the basis of an instrument's fair value using an observable market price.
Cash shortfalls are discounted using the effective interest rate on the fi nancial instrument as calculated at initial recognition, or if the instrument has a variable interest rate, the current effective interest rate determined under the contract.
| Instruments | Location of expected credit loss provisions |
|---|---|
| Financial assets held at amortised cost |
Loss provisions: netted against gross carrying value |
| Financial assets held at FVOCI – Debt instruments |
Other comprehensive income (FVOCI expected credit loss reserve) |
| Loan commitments | Provisions for liabilities and charges |
| Financial guarantees | Provisions for liabilities and charges |
Recognition
12 months expected credit losses (Stage 1)
Expected credit losses are recognised at the time of initial recognition of a fi nancial instrument and represent the lifetime cash shortfalls arising from possible default events up to 12 months into the future from the balance sheet date. Expected credit losses continue to be determined on this basis until there is either a signifi cant increase in the credit risk of an instrument or the instrument becomes creditimpaired. If an instrument is no longer considered to exhibit a signifi cant increase in credit risk, expected credit losses will revert to being determined on a 12-month basis.
Signifi cant increase in credit risk (Stage 2)
If a fi nancial asset experiences a signifi cant increase in credit risk (SICR) since initial recognition, an expected credit loss provision is recognised for default events that may occur over the lifetime of the asset.
Signifi cant increase in credit risk is assessed by comparing the risk of default of an exposure at the reporting date to the risk of default at origination (after taking into account the passage of time). Signifi cant does not mean statistically signifi cant nor is it assessed in the context of changes in expected credit loss. Whether a change in the risk of default is signifi cant or not is assessed using a number of quantitative and qualitative factors, the weight of which depends on the type of product and counterparty. Financial assets that are 30 or more days past due and not credit-impaired will always be considered to have experienced a signifi cant increase in credit risk. For less material portfolios where a loss rate or roll rate approach is applied to compute expected credit loss signifi cant increase in credit risk is primarily based on 30 days past due.
Credit impaired (or defaulted) exposures (Stage 3)
Financial assets that are credit impaired (or in default) represent those that are at least 90 days past due in respect of principal and/or interest. Financial assets are also considered to be credit impaired where the obligors are unlikely to pay on the occurrence of one or more observable events that have a detrimental impact on the estimated future cash fl ows of the fi nancial asset. It may not be possible to identify a single discrete event but instead the combined effect of several events may cause fi nancial assets to become credit impaired.
Irrevocable lending commitments to a credit impaired obligor that have not yet been drawn down are also included within the stage 3 credit impairment provision to the extent that the commitment cannot be withdrawn.
Loss provisions against credit impaired fi nancial assets are determined based on an assessment of the recoverable cash fl ows under a range of scenarios, including the realisation of any collateral held where appropriate. The loss provisions held represent the difference between the present value of the cash fl ows expected to be recovered, discounted at the instrument's original effective interest rate, and the gross carrying value of the instrument prior to any credit impairment.
Recognition continued
Indian GAAP (AS 13 Investments)
Long-term investments are written down when there is a decline in fair value which is deemed to be other than temporary.
Impairments may be reversed through the income statement in subsequent periods if the investment rises in value or the reasons for the impairment no longer exist.
In accordance with RBI regulations, in respect of available-for-sale investments, impairments are required to be reversed through Investment Reserve Account (equity reserve) if the investment rises in value or the reasons for impairment no longer exist.
For loans and advances, the RBI regulations stipulate minimum provision based on days past due. Additionally, RBI regulations require banks to hold provisions in respect of standard assets and for specifi c country risk exposures.
Derecognition of fi nancial instruments – IFRS 9
Financial assets are derecognised when the rights to receive cash fl ows from the fi nancial assets have expired or where the Group has transferred substantially all risks and rewards of ownership. If substantially all the risks and rewards have been neither retained nor transferred and the Group has retained control, the assets continue to be recognised to the extent of the Group's continuing involvement.
Where fi nancial assets have been modifi ed, the modifi ed terms are assessed on a qualitative and quantitative basis to determine whether a fundamental change in the nature of the instrument has occurred, such as whether the derecognition of the pre-existing instrument and the recognition of a new instrument is appropriate.
On derecognition of a fi nancial asset, the difference between the carrying amount of the asset (or the carrying amount allocated to the portion of the asset derecognised) and the sum of the consideration received (including any new asset obtained less any new liability assumed) and any cumulative gain or loss that had been recognised in other comprehensive income is recognised in profi t or loss except for equity instruments elected FVOCI (see above) and cumulative fair value adjustments attributable to the credit risk of a liability that are held in other comprehensive income.
Financial liabilities are derecognised when they are extinguished. A fi nancial liability is extinguished when the obligation is discharged, cancelled or expires and this is evaluated both qualitatively and quantitatively. However, where a fi nancial liability has been modifi ed, it is derecognised if the difference between the modifi ed cash fl ows and the original cash fl ows is more than 10 per cent.
If the Group purchases its own debt, it is derecognised and the difference between the carrying amount of the liability and the consideration paid is included in Other income except for the cumulative fair value adjustments attributable to the credit risk of a liability that are held in other comprehensive income which are never recycled to the profi t or loss.
IFRS classifi cation debt/equity
The substance of a fi nancial instrument, rather than its legal form, governs its classifi cation. A fi nancial instrument is classifi ed as a liability where there is a contractual obligation to deliver either cash or another fi nancial asset to the holder of that instrument, regardless of the manner in which the contractual obligation will be settled. Preference shares, which carry a mandatory coupon or are redeemable on a specifi c date or at the option of the shareholder are classifi ed as fi nancial liabilities and are presented in other borrowed funds. The dividends on these preference shares are recognised in the income statement as interest expense on an amortised cost basis using the effective interest method.
Indian GAAP
Classifi cation is based on the legal form rather than substance.
Provisions for liabilities and charges
IFRS (IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets)
The amount recognised as a provision is the best estimate at the balance sheet date of the expenditure required to settle the obligation, discounted using a pre-tax market discount rate if the effect is material.
Indian GAAP (AS 29 Provisions, Contingents Liabilities and Contingent Assets)
Provisions are recognised and measured on a similar basis to IFRS, except that there is no requirement for discounting the provision or liability.
Pension obligations
IFRS (IAS 19 Employee Benefi ts)
For defi ned contribution plans, contributions are charged to operating expenses. For funded defi ned benefi t plans, the liability recognised in the balance sheet is the present value of the defi ned benefi t obligation at the balance sheet date less the fair value of plan assets. For unfunded defi ned benefi t plans the liability recognised at the balance sheet date is the present value of the defi ned benefi t obligation. The defi ned benefi t obligation is calculated annually by independent actuaries using the projected unit method. The present value of the defi ned benefi t obligation is determined by discounting the estimated future cash outfl ows using an interest rate equal to the yield on high-quality corporate bonds. Actuarial gains and losses that arise are recognised in shareholders' equity and presented in the statement of other comprehensive income in the period they arise. The net interest expense on the net defi ned liability for the year is determined by applying the discount rate used to measure the defi ned benefi t obligation at the beginning of the annual period to the then net defi ned benefi t liability, taking into account any changes in the net defi ned benefi t liability during the year as a result of contributions and benefi t payment. Net interest expense and other expense related to defi ned benefi t plans are recognised in the income statement.
Indian GAAP (AS 15 Employee Benefi ts)
The discount rate to be used for determining defi ned benefi t obligations is established by reference to market yields at the balance sheet date on government bonds. The expected return on plan assets is based on market expectation for the returns over the entire life of the related obligation. Actuarial gains or losses are recognised immediately in the statement of income.
Share-based compensation
IFRS (IFRS 2 Share-based payments)
IFRS 2 requires that all share-based payments are accounted for using a fair value method. The fair value of the employee services received in exchange for the grant of the options is recognised as an expense. For equity-settled awards, the total amount to be expensed over the vesting period must be determined by reference to the fair value of the options granted (determined using an option pricing model), excluding the impact of any non-market vesting conditions (for example, profi tability and growth targets). Non-market vesting conditions must be included in assumptions about the number of options that are expected to become exercisable. At each balance sheet date, the Group revises its estimates of the number of options that are expected to become exercisable. It recognises the impact of the revision of original estimates, if any, in the income statement, and a corresponding adjustment to equity over the remaining vesting period. The proceeds received net of any directly attributable transaction costs are credited to share capital (nominal value) and share premium when the options are exercised.
Share-based compensation continued
Cash-settled awards must be revalued at each balance sheet date on an intrinsic value basis (being the difference between the market price of the share at the measurement date and the exercise price) with any changes in fair value charged or credited to staff costs in the income statement.
Indian GAAP
Entities may either follow the intrinsic value method or the fair value method for determining the costs of benefi ts arising from sharebased compensation plans. Although the fair value approach is recommended, entities may use the intrinsic value method and provide fair value disclosures.
Deferred tax is not recognised as it is not considered to represent a timing difference.
Entities are also permitted the option of recognising the related compensation cost over the service period for the entire award (that is, over the service period of the last separately vesting portion of the award), provided that the amount of compensation cost recognised at any date at least equals the fair value of the vested portion of the award at that date.
Deferred taxation
IFRS (IAS 12 Income Taxes)
Deferred tax is determined based on temporary differences, being the difference between the carrying amount and tax base of assets and liabilities, subject to certain exceptions.
Deferred tax assets are recognised if it is probable (more likely than not) that suffi cient future taxable profi ts will be available to utilise to deferred tax assets.
Indian GAAP (AS 22 Accounting for Taxes on Income)
Deferred tax is determined based on timing differences, being the difference between accounting income and taxable income for a period that is capable of reversal in one or more subsequent periods.
Deferred tax assets are recognised where it is probable that future taxable profi t will be available against which the temporary differences can be utilised.
Interest income and expense
IFRS (IFRS 9)
Interest income and expense is recognised in the income statement using the effective interest method. The effective interest rate is the rate that discounts estimated future cash payments or receipts through the expected life of the fi nancial instrument. When calculating the effective interest rate, the Group estimates cash fl ows considering all contractual terms of the fi nancial instrument but does not consider future credit losses. The calculation includes all fees and points paid or received between parties to the contract that are an integral part of the effective interest rate, transaction costs and all other premiums or discounts.
Indian GAAP (IAS 9 Revenue Recognition)
As per IAS 9, Interest is recognised on a time proportion basis taking into account the amount outstanding and the rate applicable. In the absence of a specifi c effective interest rate requirement, premiums and discounts are usually amortised on a straight-line basis over the term of the instrument.
Dividends
IFRS (IAS 10 Events After The Reporting Date)
Dividends to holders of equity instruments, when proposed or declared after the balance sheet date, should not be recognised as a liability on the balance sheet date. A company, however, is required to disclose the amount of dividends that were proposed or declared after the balance sheet date but before the fi nancial statements were authorised for issue.
Indian GAAP
Accounting and disclosure of dividends is similar to IFRS with effect from 1 April 2016.
Other supplementary information
A. Our Fair Pay Charter
The Group's Fair Pay Charter sets out the principles we use to determine and deliver pay for all employees globally. Our Fair Pay Charter is set out in the Group's 2017 Annual Report and Accounts.
B. Group Share Plans
2011 Standard Chartered Share Plan (the '2011 Plan')
The 2011 Plan was approved by shareholders in May 2011 and is the Group's main share plan. Since approval, it has been used to deliver various types of share awards:
- ¼ Long Term Incentive Plan ('LTIP') awards: granted with vesting subject to performance measures. Performance measures attached to awards granted previously include: total shareholder return ('TSR'); return on equity ('RoE') with a common equity tier 1 ('CET1') underpin; strategic measures; earnings per share ('EPS') growth; and return on risk-weighted assets ('RoRWA'). Each measure is assessed independently over a three-year period. Awards granted from 2016 have an individual conduct gateway requirement that results in the award lapsing if not met
- ¼ Deferred awards are used to deliver the deferred portion of variable remuneration, in line with both market practice and regulatory requirements. These awards vest in instalments on anniversaries of the award date specifi ed at the time of grant. Deferred awards are not subject to any plan limit. This enables the Group to meet regulatory requirements relating to deferral levels, and is in line with market practice
- ¼ Restricted share awards, made outside of the annual performance process as replacement buy-out awards to new joiners who forfeit awards on leaving their previous employers, vest in instalments on the anniversaries of the award date specifi ed at the time of grant. This enables the Group to meet regulatory requirements relating to buy-outs, and is in line with market practice. In line with similar plans operated by our competitors, restricted share awards are not subject to an annual limit and do not have any performance measures
- ¼ Underpin shares are subject to a combination of two performance measures: EPS growth and RoRWA. The weighting between the two elements is split equally, one-half of the award depending on each measure, assessed independently. These awards vest after three or fi ve years. Underpin shares formed part of the variable remuneration awarded to executive directors and senior management in respect of 2014 performance
Under the 2011 Plan, no grant price is payable to receive an award. The remaining life of the 2011 Plan during which new awards can be made is three years.
2001 Performance Share Plan ('2001 PSP') – now closed to new grants
The Group's previous plan for delivering performance shares was the 2001 PSP and there remain outstanding vested awards. Under the 2001 PSP half the award was dependent upon TSR performance and the balance was subject to a target of defi ned EPS growth. Both measures used the same three-year period and were assessed independently.
2006 Restricted Share Scheme ('2006 RSS') / 2007 Supplementary Restricted Share Scheme ('2007 SRSS')
The Group's previous plans for delivering restricted shares were the 2006 RSS and 2007 SRSS both now replaced by the 2011 Plan. There are no outstanding vested awards under these plans. Awards were generally in the form of nil cost options and did not have any performance measures. Generally deferred restricted share awards vested equally over three years and for non-deferred awards half vested two years after the date of grant and the balance after three years. No further awards will be granted under the 2006 RSS and 2007 SRSS.
All Employee Sharesave Plans
2013 Sharesave Plan
The 2013 Sharesave Plan was approved by shareholders in May 2013. Under the 2013 Sharesave Plan, employees may open a savings contract. Within a maturity period of six months after the third anniversary, employees may purchase ordinary shares in the Company at a discount of up to 20 per cent on the share price at the date of invitation (this is known as the 'option exercise price'). There are no performance measures attached to options granted under the 2013 Sharesave Plan and no grant price is payable to receive an option. In some countries in which the Group operates, it is not possible to deliver shares through the 2013 Sharesave Plan, typically due to securities law and regulatory restrictions. In these countries, the Group offers an equivalent cash-based plan to its employees. The remaining life of the 2013 Sharesave Plan is four years.
2004 International Sharesave and the 2004 UK Sharesave plans
The Group's previous all employee Sharesave plans were the 2004 International Sharesave and the 2004 UK Sharesave plans, both replaced by the 2013 Sharesave Plan. There are no outstanding vested awards under these plans. These plans are closed and no further awards will be granted under them.
B. Group Share Plans continued
Valuation of share awards
Details of the valuation models used in determining the fair values of share awards granted under the Group's share plans are detailed in the Group's 2017 Annual Report and Accounts.
Reconciliation of share award movements for the period to 30 June 2018
| 2011 Plan1 | Weighted | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTIP | Deferred/ restricted shares |
PSP1 | RSS1 | SRSS1 | Sharesave | average Sharesave exercise price (£) |
|
| Outstanding at | |||||||
| 1 January 2018 | 25,477,368 | 23,311,221 | 17,222 | 185,943 | 1,249 | 12,818,234 | 6.06 |
| Granted2 | 2,315,629 | 12,895,556 | – | – | – | – | – |
| Lapsed | (411,393) | (840,557) | (553) | (50,484) | – | (1,929,188) | 8.29 |
| Exercised | (14,502) | (5,988,767) | (4,525) | (135,459) | (1,249) | (60,319) | 5.52 |
| Outstanding at 30 June 2018 |
27,367,102 | 29,377,453 | 12,144 | – | – | 10,828,727 | 5.66 |
| Exercisable as at 30 June 2018 |
49,891 | 4,319,615 | 12,144 | – | – | 29,996 | 5.66 |
| Range of exercise prices (£) | – | – | – | – | – | 5.30-9.38 | |
| Intrinsic value of vested but not exercised options (\$million) |
0.1 | 3.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Weighted average contractual remaining life (years) |
7.94 | 8.56 | 0.80 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.75 | |
| Weighted average share price for options exercised during the period (£) |
7.65 | 7.68 | 7.79 | 7.84 | 7.85 | 7.59 |
1 Employees do not contribute towards the cost of these awards
2 12,508,120 (DRSA/RSA) granted on 9 March 2018, 39,945 (notional dividend) granted on 11 March 2018, 63,350 (notional dividend) granted on 13 March 2018, 37,774 (notional dividend) granted on 19 March 2018, 2,076,370 (LTIP) granted on 9 March 2018, 216,127 (notional dividend) granted on 11 March 2018, 22,317 (notional dividend) granted on 13 March 2018, 815 (notional dividend) granted on 19 March 2018 and 246,367 (DRSA/RSA) granted on 18 June 2018
C. Group Chairman and independent non-executive directors' interests in ordinary shares as at 30 June 20181,2
| Shares | Shares |
|---|---|
| benefi cially held as at |
benefi cially held as at |
| 1 January 2018 | 30 June 2018 |
| Chairman | |
| J Viñals 8,500 |
8,500 |
| Current independent non-executive directors | |
| N Kheraj 2,571 |
2,571 |
| O P Bhatt 2,000 |
2,000 |
| Dr L Cheung 2,571 |
2,571 |
| Mr D P Conner 10,000 |
10,000 |
| Dr B E Grote 44,541 |
44,541 |
| Dr Han Seung-soo, KBE 3,474 |
3,509 |
| C M Hodgson 2,571 |
2,571 |
| G Huey Evans, OBE 2,571 |
2,597 |
| Dr N Okonjo-Iweala 2,000 |
2,020 |
| J M Whitbread 2,571 |
2,571 |
1 Independent non-executive directors are required to hold shares with a nominal value of \$1,000. All the directors have met this requirement
2 The benefi cial interests of directors and their related parties in the ordinary shares of the Company are set out above. The directors do not have any non-benefi cial interests in the Company's shares. None of the directors used ordinary shares as collateral for any loans. No director had either i) an interest in the Company's preference shares or loan stocks of any subsidiary or associated undertaking of the Group or ii) any corporate interests in the Company's ordinary shares. All fi gures are as at 30 June 2018
D. Executive directors' interests in ordinary shares as at 30 June 2018
Scheme interests awarded, exercised and lapsed during the period
The following table shows the changes in share interests. Employees, including executive directors, are not permitted to engage in any personal hedging strategies with regards to their Standard Chartered PLC shares, including hedging against the share price of Standard Chartered PLC shares.
| Changes in interests during the period 1 January to 30 June 2018 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As at 1 January | Awarded1 | Dividends awarded7 |
Exercised2 | Lapsed | As at 30 June | Performance period end |
Vesting date | |
| W T Winters3 | ||||||||
| Restricted shares | 314,822 | – | – | – | – | 314,822 | – | 22 Sep 2018 |
| (buy-out) | 314,916 | – | – | – | – | 314,916 | – | 22 Sep 2019 |
| LTIP 2016–18 | 496,390 | – | – | – | – | 496,390 | 11 Mar 2019 | 4 May 2019 |
| 124,097 | – | – | – | – | 124,097 | 11 Mar 2019 | 4 May 2020 | |
| 124,097 | – | – | – | – | 124,097 | 11 Mar 2019 | 4 May 2021 | |
| 124,097 | – | – | – | – | 124,097 | 11 Mar 2019 | 4 May 2022 | |
| 124,100 | – | – | – | – | 124,100 | 11 Mar 2019 | 4 May 2023 | |
| LTIP 2017–19 | 118,550 | – | – | – | – | 118,550 | 13 Mar 2020 | 13 Mar 2020 |
| 118,550 | – | – | – | – | 118,550 | 13 Mar 2020 | 13 Mar 2021 | |
| 118,550 | – | – | – | – | 118,550 | 13 Mar 2020 | 13 Mar 2022 | |
| 118,550 | – | – | – | – | 118,550 | 13 Mar 2020 | 13 Mar 2023 | |
| 118,551 | – | – | – | – | 118,551 | 13 Mar 2020 | 13 Mar 2024 | |
| LTIP 2018–20 | – | 108,378 | – | – | – | 108,378 | 9 Mar 2021 | 9 Mar 2021 |
| – | 108,378 | – | – | – | 108,378 | 9 Mar 2021 | 9 Mar 2022 | |
| – | 108,378 | – | – | – | 108,378 | 9 Mar 2021 | 9 Mar 2023 | |
| – | 108,378 | – | – | – | 108,378 | 9 Mar 2021 | 9 Mar 2024 | |
| – | 108,379 | – | – | – | 108,379 | 9 Mar 2021 | 9 Mar 2025 | |
| A N Halford | ||||||||
| LTIP 2015–174 | 28,529 | – | – | – | 28,529 | – | 31 Dec 2017 | 19 Mar 2020 |
| LTIP 2016–185 | 296,417 | – | – | – | – | 296,417 | 11 Mar 2019 | 4 May 2019 |
| 74,104 | – | – | – | – | 74,104 | 11 Mar 2019 | 4 May 2020 | |
| 74,104 | – | – | – | – | 74,104 | 11 Mar 2019 | 4 May 2021 | |
| 74,104 | – | – | – | – | 74,104 | 11 Mar 2019 | 4 May 2022 | |
| 74,105 | – | – | – | – | 74,105 | 11 Mar 2019 | 4 May 2023 | |
| LTIP 2017–195 | 73,390 | – | – | – | – | 73,390 | 13 Mar 2020 | 13 Mar 2020 |
| 73,390 | – | – | – | – | 73,390 | 13 Mar 2020 | 13 Mar 2021 | |
| 73,390 | – | – | – | – | 73,390 | 13 Mar 2020 | 13 Mar 2022 | |
| 73,390 | – | – | – | – | 73,390 | 13 Mar 2020 | 13 Mar 2023 | |
| 73,394 | – | – | – | – | 73,394 | 13 Mar 2020 | 13 Mar 2024 | |
| LTIP 2018–20 | – | 67,108 | – | – | – | 67,108 | 9 Mar 2021 | 9 Mar 2021 |
| – | 67,108 | – | – | – | 67,108 | 9 Mar 2021 | 9 Mar 2022 | |
| – | 67,108 | – | – | – | 67,108 | 9 Mar 2021 | 9 Mar 2023 | |
| – | 67,108 | – | – | – | 67,108 | 9 Mar 2021 | 9 Mar 2024 | |
| – | 67,108 | – | – | – | 67,108 | 9 Mar 2021 | 9 Mar 2025 | |
| Deferred shares 20144 | 12,936 | – | 259 | 13,195 | – | – | – | 19 Mar 2018 |
| Underpin shares | 14,264 | – | – | – | 14,264 | – | 31 Dec 2017 | 19 Mar 2018 |
| 2015–174 | 14,264 | – | – | – | 14,264 | – | 31 Dec 2017 | 19 Mar 2020 |
| Sharesave6 | 1,612 | – | – | – | – | 1,612 | – | 1 Dec 2018 |
1 For the LTIP 2018–20 awards granted to Bill Winters and Andy Halford on 9 March 2018, the values granted were: Bill Winters: £3.3 million; Andy Halford: £2.1 million. The number of shares awarded in respect of the LTIP took into account the lack of dividend equivalents (calculated by reference to market consensus dividend yield) such that the overall value of the award was maintained. Performance measures apply to LTIP 2018–20. The share price at grant was the closing price on the day before the grant date
2 On 19 March 2018, Andy Halford exercised deferred share awards over a total of 13,195 shares. The closing share price on the day before exercise was £7.674
3 The unvested share awards held by Bill Winters are conditional rights under the 2011 Plan. Bill does not have to pay towards these awards
4 The LTIP 2014–16, LTIP 2015–17, deferred shares 2014 and underpin shares 2015–17 held by Andy Halford are nil cost options under the 2011 Plan
5 The LTIP 2016–18, LTIP 2017–19 and LTIP 2018–20 held by Andy Halford are conditional rights under the 2011 Plan. Andy does not have to pay towards these awards
6 The Sharesave option held by Andy Halford is under the 2013 Sharesave Plan at an exercise price of GBP 5.5776 per share
7 Dividend equivalent shares may be awarded on vesting for awards granted prior to 1 January 2018
8 Further details relating to the above awards and individual shareholding requirements can be found in the 2017 Annual Report and Accounts
D. Executive directors' interests in ordinary shares as at 30 June 2018 continued
Shareholdings and share interests
The following table summarises the executive directors' shareholdings and share interests1 .
| Shareholdings | Share awards | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shares held benefi cially2,3 |
Vested but unexercised share awards |
Unvested share awards not subject to performance measures |
Unvested share awards subject to performance measures |
|
| W T Winters | 836,388 | – | 629,738 | 2,127,423 |
| A N Halford | 475,610 | – | 1,612 | 1,295,328 |
1 All fi gures are as at 30 June 2018 unless stated otherwise. No director had either (i) an interest in Standard Chartered PLC's preference shares or loan stocks of any subsidiary or associated undertaking of the Group or (ii) any corporate interests in Standard Chartered PLC's ordinary shares
2 The benefi cial interests of directors and connected persons in the ordinary shares of the Company are set out above. The executive directors do not have any non-benefi cial interests in the Company's shares. None of the executive directors used ordinary shares as collateral for any loans
3 The shares held benefi cially include shares awarded to deliver the executive directors' fi xed pay allowance
E. Share price information
The middle market price of an ordinary share at the close of business on 30 June 2018 was 692.60 pence. The share price range during the fi rst half of 2018 was 690.90 pence to 849.20 pence (based on the closing middle market prices).
F. Substantial shareholders
The Company and its shareholders have been granted partial exemption from the disclosure requirements under Part XV of the Securities and Futures Ordinance (SFO).
As a result of this exemption, shareholders no longer have an obligation under Part XV of the SFO (other than Divisions 5, 11 and 12 thereof) to notify the Company of substantial shareholding interests, and the Company is no longer required to maintain a register of interests of substantial shareholders under section 336 of the SFO. The Company is, however, required to fi le with The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited any disclosure of interests made in the UK.
G. Code for Financial Reporting Disclosure
The UK Finance Code for Financial Reporting Disclosure sets out fi ve disclosure principles together with supporting guidance. The principles are that UK banks will: provide high quality, meaningful and decision useful disclosures; review and enhance their fi nancial instrument disclosures for key areas of interest; assess the applicability and relevance of good practice recommendations to their disclosures, acknowledging the importance of such guidance; seek to enhance the comparability of fi nancial statement disclosures across the UK banking sector; and clearly differentiate in their annual reports between information that is audited and information that is unaudited. The Group's interim fi nancial statements for the six months ended 30 June 2018 have been prepared in accordance with the Code's principles.
Glossary
AT1 or Additional Tier 1 capital
Additional Tier 1 capital consists of instruments other than Common Equity Tier 1 that meet the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) criteria for inclusion in Tier 1 capital.
Additional value adjustment
See Prudent valuation adjustment.
Advanced Internal Rating Based (AIRB) approach
The AIRB approach under the Basel framework is used to calculate credit risk capital based on the Group's own estimates of prudential parameters.
Advances-to-deposits/customer advances-to-deposits (ADR) ratio
The ratio of total loans and advances to customers relative to total customer accounts. A low advances-to-deposits ratio demonstrates that customer accounts exceed customer loans resulting from emphasis placed on generating a high level of stable funding from customers.
Alternative performance measures
A fi nancial measure of historical or future fi nancial performance, fi nancial position, or cash fl ows, other than a fi nancial measure defi ned or specifi ed in the applicable fi nancial reporting framework.
ASEAN
Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) which includes the Group's operations in Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam.
AUM or Assets under management
Total market value of assets such as deposits, securities and funds held by the Group on behalf of the clients.
Basel II
The capital adequacy framework issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) in June 2006 in the form of the International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards.
Basel III
The global regulatory standards on bank capital adequacy and liquidity, originally issued in December 2010 and updated in June 2011. In December 2017, the BCBS published a document setting out the fi nalisation of the Basel III framework. The latest requirements issued in December 2017 will be implemented from 2022.
BCBS or Basel Committee on Banking Supervision
A forum on banking supervisory matters which develops global supervisory standards for the banking industry. Its members are offi cials from 45 central banks or prudential supervisors from 28 countries and territories.
Basic underling earnings per share (EPS)
Represents the underlying earnings divided by the basic weighted average number of shares.
Basis point (bps)
One hundredth of a per cent (0.01 per cent); 100 basis points is 1 per cent.
CRD IV or Capital Requirements Directive IV
A capital adequacy legislative package adopted by EU member states. CRD IV comprises the recast Capital Requirements Directive and the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR). The package implements the Basel III framework together with transitional arrangements for some of its requirements. CRD IV came into force on 1 January 2014.
Capital resources
Sum of Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital after regulatory adjustments.
CGU or Cash-generating unit
The smallest identifi able group of assets that generates cash infl ows that are largely independent of the cash infl ows from other assets or groups of assets.
Cash shortfall
The difference between the cash fl ows that are due in accordance with the contractual terms of the instrument and the cash fl ows that the Group expects to receive over the contractual life of the instrument.
Clawback
An amount an individual is required to pay back to the Group, which has to be returned to the Group under certain circumstances.
CRE or Commercial real estate
Includes offi ce buildings, industrial property, medical centres, hotels, malls, retail stores, shopping centres, farm land, multi-family housing buildings, warehouses, garages and industrial properties. Commercial real estate loans are those backed by a package of commercial real estate assets.
CET1 or Common Equity Tier 1 capital
Common Equity Tier 1 capital consists of the common shares issued by the Group and related share premium, retained earnings, accumulated other comprehensive income and other disclosed reserves, eligible non-controlling interests and regulatory adjustments required in the calculation of Common Equity Tier 1.
CET1 ratio
A measure of the Group's CET1 capital as a percentage of riskweighted assets.
Constant currency
Constant currency change is derived by applying a simple translation of the previous period functional currency number in each entity using the current average and period end US dollar exchange rates to the income statement and balance sheet respectively.
Contractual maturity
Contractual maturity refers to the fi nal payment date of a loan or other fi nancial instrument, at which point all the remaining outstanding principal and interest is due to be paid.
CIR or Cost to income ratio
Represents the proportion of total operating expenses to total operating income. Underlying CIR represents the proportion of total underlying expenses to total underling operating income.
Countercyclical capital buffer
The countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) is part of a set of macroprudential instruments, designed to help counter procyclicality in the fi nancial system. CCyB as defi ned in the Basel III standard provides for an additional capital requirement of up to 2.5 per cent of risk-weighted assets in a given jurisdiction. The Bank of England's Financial Policy Committee has the power to set the CCyB rate for the United Kingdom. Each bank must calculate its 'institution-specifi c' CCyB rate, defi ned as the weighted average of the CCyB rates in effect across the jurisdictions in which it has credit exposures. The institution-specifi c CCyB rate is then applied to a bank's total risk weighted assets.
Counterparty credit risk
The risk that a counterparty defaults before satisfying its obligations under a derivative, a securities fi nancing transaction (SFT) or a similar contract.
Cover ratio
The ratio of impairment provisions for each stage to the gross loan exposure for each stage. For stage 3, the cover ratio is also presented as the ratio of impairment provisions plus the realisable value of collateral to the gross loan exposure.
Cover ratio (after collateral)
Represents the extent to which non-performing loans are covered by both impairment provisions, and collateral held against the exposure.
CCF or Credit conversion factor
An estimate of the amount the Group expects a customer to have drawn further on a facility limit at the point of default. This is either prescribed by CRR or modelled by the bank.
CDS or Credit default swaps
A credit derivative is an arrangement whereby the credit risk of an asset (the reference asset) is transferred from the buyer to the seller of protection. A credit default swap is a contract where the protection seller receives premium or interest-related payments in return for contracting to make payments to the protection buyer upon a defi ned credit event. Credit events normally include bankruptcy, payment default on a reference asset or assets, or downgrades by a rating agency.
Credit institutions
An institution whose business is to receive deposits or other repayable funds from the public and to grant credits for its own account.
Credit risk mitigation
Credit risk mitigation is a process to mitigate potential credit losses from any given account, customer or portfolio by using a range of tools such as collateral, netting agreements, credit insurance, credit derivatives and guarantees.
CVA or Credit valuation adjustments
An adjustment to the fair value of derivative contracts that refl ects the possibility that the counterparty may default such that the Group would not receive the full market value of the contracts.
Customer accounts
Money deposited by all individuals and companies which are not credit institutions including securities sold under repurchase agreement (see repo/reverse repo). Such funds are recorded as liabilities in the Group's balance sheet under customer accounts.
Days past due
One or more days that interest and/or principal payments are overdue based on the contractual terms.
DVA or Debit valuation adjustment
An adjustment to the fair value of derivative contracts that refl ect the possibility that the Group may default and not pay the full market value of contracts.
Debt securities
Debt securities are assets on the Group's balance sheet and represent certifi cates of indebtedness of credit institutions, public bodies or other undertakings excluding those issued by central banks.
Debt securities in issue
Debt securities in issue are transferrable certifi cates of indebtedness of the Group to the bearer of the certifi cate. These are liabilities of the Group and include certifi cates of deposits.
DTA or Deferred tax asset
Income taxes recoverable in future periods in respect of deductible temporary differences between the accounting and tax base of an asset or liability that will result in tax deductible amounts in future periods, the carry-forward of tax losses or the carry-forward of unused tax credits.
DTL or Deferred tax liability
Income taxes payable in future periods in respect of taxable temporary differences between the accounting and tax base of an asset or liability that will result in taxable amounts in future periods.
Default
Financial assets in default represent those that are at least 90 days past due in respect of principal or interest and/or where the assets are otherwise considered to be unlikely to pay, including those that are credit impaired.
Defi ned benefi t obligation
The present value of expected future payments required to settle the obligations of a defi ned benefi t scheme resulting from employee service.
Defi ned benefi t scheme
Pension or other post-retirement benefi t scheme other than a defi ned contribution scheme.
Defi ned contribution scheme
A pension or other post-retirement benefi t scheme where the employer's obligation is limited to its contributions to the fund.
Delinquency
A debt or other fi nancial obligation is considered to be in a state of delinquency when payments are overdue. Loans and advances are considered to be delinquent when consecutive payments are missed. Also known as arrears.
Deposits by banks
Deposits by banks comprise amounts owed to other domestic or foreign credit institutions by the Group including securities sold under repo.
Diluted underling earnings per share (EPS)
Represents the underlying earnings divided by the diluted weighted average number of shares.
Dividend per share
Represents the entitlement of each shareholder in the share of the profi ts of the company. Calculated in the lowest unit of currency in which the shares are quoted.
Early alert, purely and non-purely precautionary
A borrower's account which exhibits risks or potential weaknesses of a material nature requiring closer monitoring, supervision, or attention by management. Weaknesses in such a borrower's account, if left uncorrected, could result in deterioration of repayment prospects and the likelihood of being downgraded to credit grade 12 or worse. When an account is on early alert, it is classifi ed as either purely precautionary or non-purely precautionary. A purely precautionary account is one that exhibits early alert characteristics but these do not present any imminent credit concern. If the symptoms present an imminent credit concern, an account will be considered for classifi cation as non-purely precautionary.
Effective tax rate
The tax on profi t/(losses) on ordinary activities as a percentage of profi t/(loss) on ordinary activities before taxation.
Encumbered assets
On-balance sheet assets pledged or used as collateral in respect of certain of the Group's liabilities.
EU or European Union
The European Union (EU) is a political and economic union of 28 member states that are located primarily in Europe.
Eurozone
Represents the 19 EU countries that have adopted the euro as their common currency.
ECL or Expected credit loss
Represents the present value of expected cash shortfalls over the residual term of a fi nancial asset, undrawn commitment or fi nancial guarantee.
Expected loss
The Group measure of anticipated loss for exposures captured under an internal ratings-based credit risk approach for capital adequacy calculations. It is measured as the Group-modelled view of anticipated loss based on probability of default, loss given default and exposure at default, with a one-year time horizon.
Exposures
Credit exposures represent the amount lent to a customer, together with any undrawn commitments.
EAD or Exposure at default
The estimation of the extent to which the Group may be exposed to a customer or counterparty in the event of, and at the time of, that counterparty's default. At default, the customer may not have drawn the loan fully or may already have repaid some of the principal, so that exposure is typically less than the approved loan limit.
ECAI or External Credit Assessment Institution
External credit ratings are used to assign risk-weights under the standardised approach for sovereigns, corporates and institutions. The external ratings are from credit rating agencies that are registered or certifi ed in accordance with the credit rating agencies regulation or from a central bank issuing credit ratings which is exempt from the application of this regulation.
FCA or Financial Conduct Authority
The Financial Conduct Authority regulates the conduct of fi nancial fi rms and, for certain fi rms, prudential standards in the UK. It has a strategic objective to ensure that the relevant markets function well.
Forbearance
Forbearance takes place when a concession is made to the contractual terms of a loan in response to an obligor's fi nancial diffi culties. The Group classifi es such modifi ed loans as either 'Forborne – not impaired loans' or 'Loans subject to forbearance – impaired'. Once a loan is categorised as either of these, it will remain in one of these two categories until the loan matures or satisfi es the 'curing' conditions described in Note 7 to the fi nancial statements.
Forborne – not impaired loans
Loans where the contractual terms have been modifi ed due to fi nancial diffi culties of the borrower, but the loan is not considered to be impaired. See 'Forbearance'.
Free deliveries
A transaction where a bank takes receipt of a debt or equity security, a commodity or foreign exchange without making immediate payment, or where a bank delivers a debt or equity security, a commodity or foreign exchange without receiving immediate payment.
Free funds
Free funds include equity capital, retained reserves, current year unremitted profi ts and capital injections net of proposed dividends. It does not include debt capital instruments, unrealised profi ts or losses or any non-cash items.
Funded/unfunded exposures
Exposures where the notional amount of the transaction is funded or unfunded. Represents exposures where a commitment to provide future funding is made but funds have been released/not released.
FVA or Funding valuation adjustments
FVA refl ects an adjustment to fair value in respect of derivative contracts that refl ect the funding costs that the market participant would incorporate when determining an exit price.
G-SIBs or Global Systemically Important Banks
Global banking fi nancial institutions whose size, complexity and systemic interconnectedness mean that their distress or failure would cause signifi cant disruption to the wider fi nancial system and economic activity. The list of G-SIBs is assessed under a framework established by the FSB and the BCBS. In the EU, the G-SIB framework is implemented via CRD IV and G-SIBs are referred to as Global Systemically Important Institutions (G-SIIs).
G-SIB buffer
A CET1 capital buffer which results from designation as a G-SIB. The G-SIB buffer is between 1% and 3.5%, depending on the allocation to one of fi ve buckets based on the annual scoring. The G-SIB buffer is being phased in by 1 January 2019. In the EU, the G-SIB buffer is implemented via CRD IV as Global Systemically Important Institutions (G-SII) buffer requirement.
Interest rate risk
The risk of an adverse impact on the Group's income statement due to changes in interest rates.
IRB approach or internal ratings-based approach
Risk-weighting methodology in accordance with the Basel Capital Accord where capital requirements are based on a fi rm's own estimates of prudential parameters.
IMA approach or internal model approach
The approach used to calculate market risk capital and RWA with an internal market risk model approved by the PRA under the terms of CRD IV/CRR.
IAS or International Accounting Standard
A standard that forms part of the International Financial Reporting Standards framework.
IASB or International Accounting Standards Board
An independent standard-setting body responsible for the development and publication of IFRS, and approving interpretations of IFRS standards that are recommended by the IFRS Interpretations Committee (IFRIC).
IFRS or International Financial Reporting Standards
A set of international accounting standards developed and issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, consisting of principles-based guidance contained within IFRSs and IASs. All companies that have issued publicly traded securities in the EU are required to prepare annual and interim reports under IFRS and IAS standards that have been endorsed by the EU.
IFRIC
The IFRS Interpretations Committee supports the IASB in providing authoritative guidance on the accounting treatment of issues not specifi cally dealt with by existing IFRSs and IASs.
Investment grade
A debt security, treasury bill or similar instrument with a credit rating measured by external agencies of AAA to BBB.
Leverage ratio
A ratio introduced under CRD IV that compares Tier 1 capital to total exposures, including certain exposures held off-balance sheet as adjusted by stipulated credit conversion factors. Intended to be a simple, non-risk based backstop measure.
Liquid asset ratio
Ratio of total liquid assets to total assets. Liquid assets comprise cash (less restricted balances), net interbank, treasury bills and debt securities less illiquid securities.
Liquidation portfolio
A portfolio of assets which is beyond our current risk appetite metrics and is held for liquidation.
LCR or Liquidity coverage ratio
The ratio of the stock of high-quality liquid assets to expected net cash outfl ows over the following 30 days. High-quality liquid assets should be unencumbered, liquid in markets during a time of stress and, ideally, be central bank eligible.
Loan exposure
Loans and advances to customers reported on the balance sheet held at amortised cost or FVOCI, non-cancellable credit commitments and cancellable credit commitments for credit cards and overdraft facilities.
Loans and advances
This represents lending made under bilateral agreements with customers entered into in the normal course of business and is based on the legal form of the instrument.
Loans to banks
Amounts loaned to credit institutions including securities bought under Reverse repo.
LTV or loan-to-value ratio
A calculation which expresses the amount of a fi rst mortgage lien as a percentage of the total appraised value of real property. The loan-tovalue ratio is used in determining the appropriate level of risk for the loan and therefore the correct price of the loan to the borrower.
Loans past due
Loans on which payments have been due for up to a maximum of 90 days including those on which partial payments are being made.
Loans subject to forbearance – impaired
Loans where the terms have been renegotiated on terms not consistent with current market levels due to fi nancial diffi culties of the borrower. Loans in this category are necessarily impaired. See 'Forbearance'.
Loss rate
Uses an adjusted gross charge-off rate, developed using monthly write-off and recoveries over the preceding 12 months and total outstanding balances.
LGD or Loss given default
The percentage of an exposure that a lender expects to lose in the event of obligor default.
Malus
An arrangement that permits the Group to prevent vesting of all or part of the amount of an unvested variable remuneration award, due to a specifi c crystallised risk, behaviour, conduct or adverse performance outcome.
Master netting agreement
An agreement between two counterparties that have multiple derivative contracts with each other that provides for the net settlement of all contracts through a single payment, in a single currency, in the event of default on, or termination of, any one contract.
Mezzanine capital
Financing that combines debt and equity characteristics. For example, a loan that also confers some profi t participation to the lender.
MREL or minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities
A requirement under the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive for EU resolution authorities to set a minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities for banks, implementing the FSB's Total Loss Absorbing Capacity (TLAC) standard. MREL is intended to ensure that there is suffi cient equity and specifi c types of liabilities to facilitate an orderly resolution that minimises any impact on fi nancial stability and ensures the continuity of critical functions and avoids exposing taxpayers to loss.
Net asset value (NAV) per share
Ratio of net assets (total assets less total liabilities) to the number of ordinary shares outstanding at the end of a reporting period.
Net exposure
The aggregate of loans and advances to customers/loans and advances to banks after impairment provisions, restricted balances with central banks, derivatives (net of master netting agreements), investment debt and equity securities, and letters of credit and guarantees.
NII or Net interest income
The difference between interest received on assets and interest paid on liabilities.
NIM or Net interest margin
Net interest income divided by average interest earning assets.
NSFR or Net stable funding ratio
The ratio of available stable funding to required stable funding over a one-year time horizon, assuming a stressed scenario. It is a longer-term liquidity measure designed to restrain the amount of wholesale borrowing and encourage stable funding over a one-year time horizon.
Net tangible asset value per share
Ratio of net tangible assets (total tangible assets less total liabilities) to the number of ordinary shares outstanding at the end of a reporting period.
NPLs or non-performing loans
An NPL is any loan that is more than 90 days past due or is otherwise individually impaired. This excludes Retail loans renegotiated at or after 90 days past due, but on which there has been no default in interest or principal payments for more than 180 days since renegotiation, and against which no loss of principal is expected.
Non-linearity
Non-linearity of expected credit loss occurs when the average of expected credit loss for a portfolio is higher than the base case (median) due to the fact that bad economic environment could have a larger impact on expected credit loss calculation than good economic environment.
Normalised items
See 'Underlying earnings'.
Operating expenses
Staff and premises costs, general and administrative expenses, depreciation and amortisation. Underlying operating expenses exclude expenses as described in 'Underlying earnings'. A reconciliation between underlying and statutory earnings is contained in Note 2 to the fi nancial statements.
Operating income or operating profi t
Net interest, net fee and net trading income, as well as other operating income.
Underlying operating income represents the income line items above, on an underlying basis. See 'Underling earnings'.
OTC or Over-the-counter derivatives
A bilateral transaction (e.g. derivatives) that is not exchange traded and that is valued using valuation models.
OCA or Own credit adjustment
An adjustment to the Group's issued debt designated at fair value through profi t or loss that refl ects the possibility that the Group may default and not pay the full market value of the contracts.
Physical risks
The risk of increased extreme weather events including fl ood, drought and sea level rise.
Pillar 1
The fi rst pillar of the three pillars of the Basel framework which provides the approach to calculation of the minimum capital requirements for credit, market and operational risk. Minimum capital requirements are 8 per cent of the Group's risk-weighted assets.
Pillar 2
The second pillar of the three pillars of theBasel framework which requires banks to undertake a comprehensive assessment of their risks and to determine the appropriate amounts of capital to be held against these risks where other suitable mitigants are not available.
Pillar 3
The third pillar of the three pillars of the Basel framework which aims to provide a consistent and comprehensive disclosure framework that enhances comparability between banks and further promotes improvements in risk practices.
Private equity investments
Equity securities in operating companies generally not quoted on a public exchange. Investment in private equity often involves the investment of capital in private companies. Capital for private equity investment is raised by retail or institutional investors and used to fund investment strategies such as leveraged buyouts, venture capital, growth capital, distressed investments and mezzanine capital.
PD or Probability of default
PD is an internal estimate for each borrower grade of the likelihood that an obligor will default on an obligation over a given time horizon.
Probability weighted
Obtained by considering the values the metric can assume, weighted by the probability of each value occurring.
Profi t (loss) attributable to ordinary shareholders
Profi t (loss) for the year after non-controlling interests and dividends declared in respect of preference shares classifi ed as equity.
PVA or Prudent valuation adjustment
An adjustment to CET1 capital to refl ect the difference between fair value and prudent value positions, where the application of prudence results in a lower absolute carrying value than recognised in the fi nancial statements.
PRA or Prudential Regulation Authority
The Prudential Regulation Authority is the statutory body responsible for the prudential supervision of banks, building societies, credit unions, insurers and a small number of signifi cant investment fi rms in the UK. The PRA is a part of the Bank of England.
Repo/reverse repo
A repurchase agreement or repo is a short-term funding agreement, which allows a borrower to sell a fi nancial asset, such as asset-backed securities or government bonds as collateral for cash. As part of the agreement the borrower agrees to repurchase the security at some later date, usually less than 30 days, repaying the proceeds of the loan. For the party on the other end of the transaction (buying the security and agreeing to sell in the future) it is a reverse repurchase agreement or reverse repo.
Residential mortgage
A loan to purchase a residential property which is then used as collateral to guarantee repayment of the loan. The borrower gives the lender a lien against the property, and the lender can foreclose on the property if the borrower does not repay the loan per the agreed terms. Also known as a home loan.
RoE or Return on equity
Represents the ratio of the current year's profi t available for distribution to ordinary shareholders to the weighted average ordinary shareholders equity for the reporting period. Underlying return on equity represents the ratio above using underlying earnings. See 'Underling earnings'.
RoRWA or Return on risk-weighted assets
Profi t before tax for year as a percentage of RWA. Profi t may be statutory or underlying and is specifi ed where used. See 'RWA' and 'Underlying earnings'.
RoTE or Return on tangible equity
Represents the ratio of the current period's profi t available for distribution to ordinary shareholders, to the weighted average ordinary shareholders equity less the average goodwill and intangibles for the reporting period. Underlying return on tangible equity represents the ratio above using underlying earnings. See 'Underling earnings'.
RWA or Risk-weighted assets
A measure of a bank's assets adjusted for their associated risks, expressed as a percentage of an exposure value in accordance with the applicable standardised or IRB approach provisions.
Risks-not-in-VaR (RNIV)
A framework for identifying and quantifying marginal types of market risk that are not captured in the Value at Risk (VaR) measure for any reason, such as being a far-tail risk or the necessary historical market data not being available.
Roll rate
Uses a matrix that gives average loan migration rate from delinquency states from period to period. A matrix multiplication is then performed to generate the fi nal PDs by delinquency bucket over different time horizons.
Secured (fully and partially)
A secured loan is a loan in which the borrower pledges an asset as collateral for a loan which, in the event that the borrower defaults, the Group is able to take possession of. All secured loans are considered fully secured if the fair value of the collateral is equal to or greater than the loan at the time of origination. All other secured loans are considered to be partly secured.
Securitisation
Securitisation is a process by which credit exposures are aggregated into a pool, which is used to back new securities. Under traditional securitisation transactions, assets are sold to a special purpose entity (SPE) who then issues new securities to investors at different levels of seniority (credit tranching). This allows the credit quality of the assets to be separated from the credit rating of the originating institution and transfers risk to external investors in a way that meets their risk appetite. Under synthetic securitisation transactions, the transfer of risk is achieved by the use of credit derivatives or guarantees, and the exposures being securitised remain exposures of the originating institution.
Senior debt
Debt that takes priority over other unsecured or otherwise more 'junior' debt owed by the issuer. Senior debt has greater seniority in the issuer's capital structure after subordinated debt. In the event the issuer goes bankrupt, senior debt theoretically must be repaid before other creditors receive any payment.
SICR or Signifi cant increase in credit risk
Assessed by comparing the risk of default of an exposure at the reporting date to the risk of default at origination (after considering the passage of time).
Sovereign exposures
Exposures to central governments and central government departments, central banks and entities owned or guaranteed by the aforementioned. Sovereign exposures, as defi ned by the European Banking Authority, include only exposures to central governments.
Stage 1
Assets have not experienced a signifi cant increase in credit risk since origination and impairment recognised on the basis of 12 months expected credit losses.
Stage 2
Assets have experienced a signifi cant increase in credit risk since origination and impairment is recognised on the basis of lifetime expected credit losses.
Stage 3
Assets that are in default and considered credit-impaired (nonperforming loans).
Standardised approach
In relation to credit risk, a method for calculating credit risk capital requirements using External Credit Assessment Institutions (ECAI) ratings and supervisory risk weights. In relation to operational risk, a method of calculating the operational capital requirement by the application of a supervisory defi ned percentage charge to the gross income of eight specifi ed business lines.
Structured note
An investment tool which pays a return linked to the value or level of a specifi ed asset or index and sometimes offers capital protection if the value declines. Structured notes can be linked to equities, interest rates, funds, commodities and foreign currency.
Subordinated liabilities
Liabilities which, in the event of insolvency or liquidation of the issuer, are subordinated to the claims of depositors and other creditors of the issuer.
Tier 1 capital
The sum of Common Equity Tier 1 capital and Additional Tier 1 capital.
Tier 1 capital ratio
Tier 1 capital as a percentage of risk-weighted assets.
Tier 2 capital
Tier 2 capital comprises qualifying subordinated liabilities and related share premium accounts.
TLAC or Total loss absorbing capacity
An international standard for TLAC issued by the FSB, which requires G-SIBs to have suffi cient loss-absorbing and recapitalisation capacity available in resolution, to minimise impacts on fi nancial stability, maintain the continuity of critical functions and avoid exposing public funds to loss.
TSR or Total shareholder return
The total return of the Group's equity (share price growth and dividends) to investors.
Transition risks
The risk of changes to market dynamics or sectoral economics due to governments' response to climate change.
UK bank levy
A levy that applies to certain UK banks and the UK operations of foreign banks. The levy is payable each year based on a percentage of the chargeable equities and liabilities on the Group's consolidated balance sheet date. Key exclusions from chargeable equities and liabilities include Tier 1 capital, insured or guaranteed retail deposits, repos secured on certain sovereign debt and liabilities subject to netting.
Unbiased
Not overly optimistic or pessimistic, represents information that is not slanted, weighted, emphasised, deemphasised or otherwise manipulated to increase the probability that the fi nancial information will be received favourably or unfavourably by users.
Underlying earnings
The Group's statutory performance adjusted for restructuring and other items representing profi ts or losses of a capital nature; amounts consequent to investment transactions driven by strategic intent; and other infrequent and/or exceptional transactions that are signifi cant or material in the context of the Group's normal business earnings for the period, and items which management and investors would ordinarily identify separately when assessing performance period-by-period. A reconciliation between underlying and statutory performance is contained in Note 2 to the fi nancial statements.
Unlikely to pay
Indications of unlikeliness to pay shall include placing the credit obligation on non-accrued status; the recognition of a specifi c credit adjustment resulting from a signifi cant perceived decline in credit quality subsequent to the Group taking on the exposure;; selling the credit obligation at a material credit related economic loss; the Group consenting to a distressed restructuring of the credit obligation where this is likely to result in a diminished fi nancial obligation caused by the material forgiveness, or postponement, of principal, interest or, where relevant fees; fi ling for the obligor's bankruptcy or a similar order in respect of an obligor's credit obligation to the Group; the obligor has sought or has been placed in bankruptcy or similar protection where this would avoid or delay repayment of a credit obligation to the Group.
VaR or Value at Risk
A quantitative measure of market risk estimating the potential loss that will not be exceeded in a set time period at a set statistical confi dence level.
ViU or Value-in-Use
The present value of the future expected cash fl ows expected to be derived from an asset or CGU.
Write-downs
After an advance has been identifi ed as impaired and is subject to an impairment provision, the stage may be reached whereby it is concluded that there is no realistic prospect of further recovery. Write downs will occur when and to the extent that, the whole or part of a debt is considered irrecoverable.
XVA
The term used to incorporate credit, debit and funding valuation adjustments to the fair value of derivative fi nancial instruments. See 'CVA', 'DVA' and 'FVA'.
Shareholder information
Dividend and interest payment dates
| 2018 interim dividend | |
|---|---|
| Ex-dividend date1 | 9 August 2018 |
| Record date for dividend | 10 August 2018 |
| Dividend payment date | 22 October 2018 |
| 2018 fi nal dividend | (provisional only) |
| Results and dividend announcement date | 26 February 2019 |
| Preference shares | Next half-yearly dividend |
| 7 3 /8 per cent Non-cumulative irredeemable preference shares of £1 each |
1 October 2018 |
| 8 ¼ per cent Non-cumulative irredeemable preference shares of £1 each | 1 October 2018 |
| 6.409 per cent Non-cumulative preference shares of \$5 each | 30 July 2018 |
| 7.014 per cent Non-cumulative preference shares of \$5 each | 30 July 2018 |
1 Ex-dividend date is Wednesday 8 August 2018 for the Hong Kong branch register
Previous dividend payments (unadjusted for the impact of the 2015/2010/2008 Rights Issues)
| Dividend and fi nancial year | Payment date | Dividend per ordinary share1 | Cost of one new ordinary share under share dividend scheme |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interim 2006 | 11 October 2006 | 20.83c/11.14409p/HK\$1.622699 | £13.2360/\$25.03589 |
| Final 2006 | 11 May 2007 | 50.21c/25.17397p/HK\$3.926106 | £14.2140/\$27.42591 |
| Interim 2007 | 10 October 2007 | 23.12c/11.39043p/HK\$1.794713 | £15.2560/\$30.17637 |
| Final 2007 | 16 May 2008 | 56.23c/28.33485p/HK\$4.380092 | £16.2420/\$32.78447 |
| Interim 2008 | 9 October 2008 | 25.67c/13.96133p/HK\$1.995046 | £14.00/\$26.0148 |
| Final 2008 | 15 May 2009 | 42.32c/28.4693p/HK\$3.279597 | £8.342/\$11.7405 |
| Interim 2009 | 8 October 2009 | 21.23c/13.25177p/HK\$1.645304 | £13.876/\$22.799 |
| Final 2009 | 13 May 2010 | 44.80c/29.54233p/HK\$3.478306 | £17.351/\$26.252 |
| Interim 2010 | 5 October 2010 | 23.35c/14.71618p/HK\$1.811274/INR0.9841241 | £17.394/\$27.190 |
| Final 2010 | 11 May 2011 | 46.65c/28.272513p/HK\$3.623404/INR1.99751701 | £15.994/\$25.649 |
| Interim 2011 | 7 October 2011 | 24.75c/15.81958125p/HK\$1.928909813/INR1.137971251 | £14.127/\$23.140 |
| Final 2011 | 15 May 2012 | 51.25c/31.63032125p/HK\$3.9776083375/INR2.66670151 | £15.723/\$24.634 |
| Interim 2012 | 11 October 2012 | 27.23c/16.799630190p/HK\$2.111362463/INR1.3498039501 | £13.417/\$21.041 |
| Final 2012 | 14 May 2013 | 56.77c/36.5649893p/HK\$4.4048756997/INR2.9762835751 | £17.40/\$26.28792 |
| Interim 2013 | 17 October 2013 | 28.80c/17.8880256p/HK\$2.233204992/INR1.68131 | £15.362/\$24.07379 |
| Final 2013 | 14 May 2014 | 57.20c/33.9211444p/HK\$4.43464736/INR3.3546261 | £11.949\$19.815 |
| Interim 2014 | 20 October 2014 | 28.80c/17.891107200p/HK\$2.2340016000/INR1.6718425601 | £12.151/\$20.207 |
| Final 2014 | 14 May 2015 | 57.20c/37.16485p/HK\$4.43329/INR3.5140591 | £9.797/\$14.374 |
| Interim 2015 | 19 October 2015 | 14.40c/9.3979152p/HK\$1.115985456/INR0.861393721 | £8.5226/\$13.34383 |
| Final 2015 | No dividend declared | N/A | N/A |
| Interim 2016 | No dividend declared | N/A | N/A |
| Final 2016 | No dividend declared | N/A | N/A |
| Interim 2017 | No dividend declared | N/A | N/A |
| Final 2017 | 17 May 2018 | 11.00c/7.88046p/HK\$0.86293/INR0.653643340 | £7.7600/\$10.83451 |
1 The INR dividend is per Indian Depository Receipt
ShareCare
ShareCare is available to shareholders on the Company's UK register who have a UK address and bank account, and allows you to hold your Standard Chartered shares in a nominee account. Your shares will be held in electronic form so you will no longer have to worry about keeping your share certifi cates safe. If you join ShareCare you will still be invited to attend the Company's AGM and you will still receive your dividend at the same time as everyone else. ShareCare is free to join and there are no annual fees to pay. If you would like to receive more information please contact the shareholder helpline on 0370 702 0138.
Donating shares to ShareGift
Shareholders who have a small number of shares often fi nd it uneconomical to sell them. An alternative is to consider donating them to the charity ShareGift (registered charity 1052686), which collects donations of unwanted shares until there are enough to sell and uses the proceeds to support UK charities. Further information can be obtained from the Company's Registrars or from ShareGift on 020 7930 3737 or from sharegift.org. There is no implication for capital gains Tax (no gain no loss) when you donate shares to charity and UK tax-payers may be able to claim income tax relief on the value of their donation.
Bankers' Automated Clearing System (BACS)
Dividends can be paid straight into your bank or building society account. Please register online at investorcentre.co.uk or contact our registrar for a mandate form.
Registrars and shareholder enquiries
The Company's ordinary shares are listed on the Offi cial List and traded on the London Stock Exchange. The Company's ordinary shares are also listed on The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited, and through Indian Depository Receipts on the BSE Limited (Bombay Stock Exchange) and National Stock Exchange of India Limited.
If you have any enquiries relating to your shareholding and you hold your shares on the United Kingdom register, please contact our registrar Computershare Investor Services PLC at The Pavilions, Bridgwater Road, Bristol, BS99 6ZZ, or contact the shareholder helpline on 0370 702 0138.
If you hold your shares on the Hong Kong branch register and you have enquiries, please contact Computershare Hong Kong Investor Services Limited, 17M Floor, Hopewell Centre, 183 Queen's Road East, Wan Chai, Hong Kong. You can check your shareholding at: computershare.com/hk/investors.
If you hold Indian Depository Receipts and you have enquiries, please contact Karvy Selenium, Tower- B, Plot No. 31 & 32., Financial District, Nanakramguda, Serilingampally Mandal, Hyderabad, 500032, India.
Chinese translation
If you would like a Chinese version of this Half Year Report, please contact: Computershare Hong Kong Investor Services Limited at 17M.Floor, Hopewell Centre, 183 Queen's Road East, Wan Chai, Hong.Kong. 本半年報告之中文譯本可向香港中央證券登記有限公司索 取,地址:香港灣仔皇后 大道東183號合和中心17M樓。Shareholders on the Hong Kong branch register who have asked to receive corporate communications in either Chinese or English can change this election by contacting Computershare. If there is a dispute between any translation and the English version of this Half Year Report, the English text shall prevail.
Taxation
Information on taxation applying to dividends paid to you if you are a shareholder in the United Kingdom, Hong Kong and the United States will be sent to you with your dividend documents.
Forward-looking statements
This document may contain 'forward-looking statements' that are based on current expectations or beliefs, as well as assumptions about future events. These forward-looking statements can be identifi ed by the fact that they do not relate only to historical or current facts. Forward-looking statements often use words such as 'may', 'could', 'will', expect', 'intend', 'estimate', 'anticipate', 'believe', 'plan', 'seek', 'continue' or other words of similar meaning. By their very nature, such statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties and can be affected by other factors that could cause actual results, and the Group's plans and objectives, to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. Recipients should not place reliance on, and are cautioned about relying on, any forward-looking statements. There are several factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in forward-looking statements. The factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements include (but are not limited to) changes in global, political, economic, business, competitive, market and regulatory forces or conditions, future exchange and interest rates, changes in tax rates, future business combinations or dispositions and other factors specifi c to the Group. Any forwardlooking statement contained in this document is based on past or current trends and/or activities of the Group and should not be taken as a representation that such trends or activities will continue in the future.
No statement in this document is intended to be a profi t forecast or to imply that the earnings of the Group for the current year or future years will necessarily match or exceed the historical or published earnings of the Group. Each forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of the particular statement. Except as required by any applicable laws or regulations, the Group expressly disclaims any obligation to revise or update any forward looking statement contained within this document, regardless of whether those statements are affected as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Nothing in this document shall constitute, in any jurisdiction, an offer or solicitation to sell or purchase any securities or other fi nancial instruments, nor shall it constitute a recommendation or advice in respect of any securities or other fi nancial instruments or any other matter.
Designed and produced by Friend www.friendstudio.com
Printed by Park Communications on FSC ® certifi ed paper.
Park is an EMAS certifi ed company and its Environmental Management System is certifi ed to ISO 14001.
100% of the inks used are vegetable oil based, 95% of press chemicals are recycled for further use and, on average, 99% of any waste associated with this production will be recycled.
This document is printed on Revive 50 silk, a paper containing 50% recycled fi bre (25% post-consumer and 25% pre-consumer) and 50% virgin fi bre sourced from well-managed, responsible, FSC ® certifi ed forests. The pulp used in this product is bleached using an elemental chlorine free (ECF) process.
This document is fully recyclable.
© Standard Chartered PLC. All rights reserved.
The STANDARD CHARTERED word mark, its logo device and associated product brand names are owned by Standard Chartered PLC and centrally licensed to its operating entities.
Registered Offi ce: 1 Basinghall Avenue, London EC2V 5DD. Telephone +44 (0) 20 7885 8888.
Principal place of business in Hong Kong: 32nd Floor, 4-4A Des Voeux Road, Central, Hong Kong.
Registered in England No. 966425.
CONTACT INFORMATION
Global headquarters
Standard Chartered Group 1 Basinghall Avenue London, EC2V 5DD United Kingdom
telephone: +44 (0)20 7885 8888 facsimile: +44 (0)20 7885 9999
Digital Annual Report and Accounts
sc.com/annualreport
Shareholder enquiries
ShareCare information investors.sc.com/shareholder +44 (0)370 702 0138
ShareGift information sharegift.org +44 (0)20 7930 3737
Registrar information
UK Computershare Investor Services PLC The Pavilions Bridgwater Road Bristol, BS99 6ZZ +44 (0)370 702 0138
Hong Kong
Computershare Hong Kong Investor Services Limited 17M Floor, Hopewell Centre 183 Queen's Road East Wan Chai Hong Kong computershare.com/hk/investors
Indian Depository Receipts
Karvy Computershare Private Limited Karvy Selenium Tower B, Plot 31-32 Financial District, Nanakramguda, Serilingampally Mandal, Hyderabad 500032, India
Chinese translation
Computershare Hong Kong Investor Services Limited 17M Floor, Hopewell Centre 183 Queen's Road East Wan Chai Hong Kong
Register for electronic communications investorcentre.co.uk
LSE Stock code: STAN.LN
HKSE Stock code: 02888 BSE/NSE Stock code: STAN.IN