Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

ST GEORGE MINING LIMITED Capital/Financing Update 2018

Nov 29, 2018

65782_rns_2018-11-29_03c7bcb9-384d-40f9-9449-2e7dd30091a1.pdf

Capital/Financing Update

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

ASX / MEDIA RELEASE

==> picture [107 x 49] intentionally omitted <==

30 November 2018

ASSAYS CONFIRM BEST EVER INTERCEPTS OF THICK HIGH-GRADE NICKEL-COPPER SULPHIDES AT MT ALEXANDER

HIGHLIGHTS:

Laboratory assays confirm outstanding intersections of thick high-grade nickel-copper sulphides at the Investigators Prospect while drilling continues to intersect extensions to nickel-copper sulphide mineralisation:

  • Assays for MAD126:

  • 7.86m @ 5.70%Ni, 2.11%Cu and 0.18%Co from 184m including the massive sulphide interval of 5.25m @ 6.95%Ni, 2.67%Cu and 0.23%Co from 185m

  • Assays for MAD127:

  • 8.49m @ 5.78%Ni, 2.64%Cu and 0.18%Co from 183.9m including the massive sulphide interval of 6.39m @ 6.48%Ni, 2.77%Cu and 0.21%Co from 184.42m

  • Values for PGEs in MAD126 and MAD127 are pending completion of fire assays

On right: drill core from MAD127 with massive nickel-copper sulphides that returned assays of 6.39m @ 6.48%Ni, 2.77%Cu and 0.21%Co

  • Extensional Drilling at Investigators:

==> picture [219 x 357] intentionally omitted <==

  • All four drill holes completed since our last exploration update have intersected nickelcopper sulphides and confirm extensions to the footprint of high-grade mineralisation at Investigators

  • Plunge of mineralisation on the MAD60 Line is extended to 380m with MAD135 testing the MAD119:X1 conductor and confirming the continuation of nickel-copper sulphides at depth

Emerging Western Australian nickel company St George Mining Limited (ASX: SGQ ) (“ St George ” or “ the Company ”) is pleased to announce laboratory assays for the best intercepts to date of nickel-copper sulphides at the Investigators Prospect – the largest of the three nickel-copper sulphide discoveries along the 4.5km strike of the Cathedrals Belt at the Mt Alexander Project.

1

ASX / MEDIA RELEASE

==> picture [119 x 55] intentionally omitted <==

St George Mining Executive Chairman, John Prineas said:

“Grade is king in assessing the economic potential of any mining operation, and we are delighted to receive assays for MAD126 and MAD127 which confirm thick intersections of high-grade nickel-copper sulphides.

“The grades for nickel, copper and cobalt are terrific and re-affirm the high-value mineralisation that we have in the Cathedrals Belt.

“Additionally, it is very satisfying to have these thick high-grade intersections confirm the down plunge component of the mineralisation and further support the increasing potential scale of mineralisation at Investigators.

“Interim results from the four drill holes completed in the past week are also very reassuring as to the continuity of mineralisation at Investigators, with all four holes intersecting nickel-copper sulphides.

“Drill hole MAD135 was particularly pleasing with the plunge of mineralisation on the MAD60 Line extended to a very impressive 380m with mineralisation open at depth.

“With more strong EM conductors ready to drill, we are confident of intersecting further high-grade mineralisation at Investigators where drilling is continuing 24/7.”

MAD60 LINE – SIGNIFICANT DOWN PLUNGE EXTENSION

The MAD60 Line is a north-south oriented section that is situated at approximately 231225E within the Investigators Prospect.

Mineralisation on the MAD60 Line was first identified by MAD38 which intersected 2.74m @ 3.77%Ni, 1.48%Cu, 0.10%Co and 3.85g/t total PGEs from 25.4m downhole. MAD60 subsequently intersected mineralisation down dip from MAD38 with assays of 5.3m @ 4.95%Ni, 2.75%Cu, 0.16%Co, and 4.55g/t total PGEs from 157.9m.

Three drill holes were completed on the MAD60 Line in the past week with all intersecting nickel-copper sulphide mineralisation.

MAD135:

MAD135 was completed to a downhole depth of 270m to test conductor MAD119:X1.

The drill hole intersected a thick interval of mafic rocks and mineralised ultramafic as follows:

Interval Geological Logging
214.44m
232.25m
to
Mafic, no sulphides observed
232.25m
240m
to Ultramafic with sulphides increasing with depth; disseminated / blebby
sulphides ~1-2% from 235.34m onwards, including ~5% blebby/veinlet
sulphidesfrom 236.85 – 237.3m.

The intersection of nickel-copper sulphides at this target has confirmed an extension to the plunge of mineralisation on the MAD60 Line to a very significant 380m.

The style of mineralisation intersected by MAD135 does not fully explain the strong EM conductor (30,000 Siemens) modelled for this target, suggesting potential for further sulphide mineralisation proximal to this hole. A DHEM survey will be carried out in MAD135 to assist in determining the extent of the sulphide mineralisation around this hole.

2

ASX / MEDIA RELEASE

==> picture [119 x 55] intentionally omitted <==

MAD136 and MAD137:

These drill holes were completed to test for proximal extensions of the massive nickel-copper sulphides intersected in MAD60. Both MAD136 and MAD137 intersected thick ultramafic units with abundant nickel-copper sulphides.

MAD136 was drilled to a downhole depth of 160m and intersected approximately 20m of mineralised ultramafic that included massive sulphides, as follows:

Interval Geological Logging 132.48m Ultramafic with disseminated sulphides approx. to 5% sulphides (<1%Ni) increasing to >10% sulphides 149.55m (1-2%Ni) for 0.45m at end of interval 149.55m Massive nickel-copper sulphides; average XRF to readings 8.1%Ni and 3.21%Cu_ 151.93m 151.93m _Ultramafic with disseminated sulphides approx._ to _10% sulphides (1%Ni)_ 152.45m _ Laboratory assays are pending and are required to confirm the nickel and copper grades which have been estimated using portable XRF analysis

MAD137 was drilled to a downhole depth of 164m and intersected approximately 18m of mineralised ultramafic comprising:

Interval Geological Logging
135.3m
to
141.1m
Ultramafic with disseminated sulphides increasing
with depth, up to 5% sulphides (<1%Ni)
141.1m
to
145.2m
Disseminated and blebby nickel-copper sulphides;
5-10% sulphides (1-2%Ni)
145.2m
to
149.49m
Strong disseminated, blebby and veinlet nickel-
copper sulphides; >15% sulphides (1-2+%Ni)

MAD136 was drilled to the north-east and MAD137 to the south-west of the MAD60 significant intersection. Each drill hole intersected a similar thick ultramafic, confirming the consistency of the mineralisation and the ultramafic package in this area.

The consistent intervals of high-grade massive sulphide plus halos of blebby and disseminated sulphides support the potential for significant metal per vertical metre, which will be confirmed by resource definition drilling.

==> picture [144 x 536] intentionally omitted <==

Above: photo of drill core from the massive sulphide interval of MAD136 between 149.55m to 151.93m with average XRF readings of 8.1%Ni and 3.21%Cu*

Figure 1 is a cross-section of the MAD60 Line and highlights the significant thickness of the mineralised ultramafic, its strong continuity and the substantial extension down plunge where mineralisation remains open at depth.

3

ASX / MEDIA RELEASE

==> picture [119 x 55] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [433 x 372] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1 – schematic cross section of the MAD60 section (facing west) based on interpretation of drill hole data. The N-W plunge of mineralisation extends to 380m and remains open in the down plunge direction.

Figure 2 is a long section of Investigators and illustrates the extensive mineralisation intersected as well as the large areas yet to be drilled and which offer exploration upside. The mineralised ultramafic dips to the north at an angle of about 30 degrees with mineralisation open in the down dip direction.

==> picture [483 x 194] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2 – schematic long section of the Investigators Prospect (facing north) as interpreted from drill hole data. The MAD60 Line and MAD111 Line are shown, with the MAD112 Line (not shown) a further 530m to the east of the MAD111 Line. Mineralisation remains open to the north and at depth.

4

ASX / MEDIA RELEASE

==> picture [119 x 55] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 3 is a plan view map of Investigators set against SAMSON EM (electromagnetic) data. The map highlights the successful drilling completed at Investigators across the very large conductive signature that spans the 1.5km east-west strike of the prospect area.

==> picture [483 x 381] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 3 - plan view of Investigators Prospect with drill hole collar locations over the large SAMSON total field EM anomalies (red/pink colours). SAMSON EM image is shown in Channel 18 (44ms). The three north-west lines being drilled in the current programme are highlighted. Step-out drilling along these lines is continuing to extend mineralisation to the north.

MAD111 LINE

The outstanding intersections of MAD126 and MAD127 are located on the MAD111 Line, located at 231475E and approximately 250m east of the MAD60 Line. One further drill hole was completed on this section in the past week to test the north-west extension of the massive sulphides in MAD127.

MAD134 was completed to a downhole depth of 213m and intersected a mineralised ultramafic between 182.40m to 186.45m. The ultramafic package contained disseminated sulphides (approximately 1-2% sulphides) throughout. The remainder of the drill hole intersected mainly granite.

MAD134 has successfully confirmed an extension of the mineralised ultramafic to the north-west with mineralisation open in that direction.

The results from MAD134 will be reviewed together with results from other drill holes recently completed on the MAD111 Line, and in conjunction with downhole EM surveys being carried out in those holes, to better understand the geometry of the massive sulphides in this area and to plan follow-up drilling.

5

ASX / MEDIA RELEASE

==> picture [119 x 55] intentionally omitted <==

DRILL PROGRAMME

Table 1 contains laboratory assay results for MAD126 and MAD127. Assays for PGEs and Au are pending.

Hole ID GDA94
East
GDA94
North
Dip Azi Hole
Depth
(m)
From
(m)
To (m) Width
(m)
Ni% Cu% Co%
MAD126 231445 6806517 -90 0 210 184 201.86 7.86 5.70 2.11 0.18
including 185 190.25 5.25 6.95 2.67 0.23
MAD127 231440 6806515 -90 0 205 183.9 192.39 8.49 5.78 2.64 0.18
including 184.42 200.81 6.39 6.48 2.77 0.21

Table 1 – assays received for MAD126 and MAD127 at the Investigators Prospect.

Table 2 contains details of the initial drill holes for the current programme at Mt Alexander. MAD138 is currently being drilled.

Based on the intersection angle of the drilling with the modelled ultramafic unit, downhole widths are interpreted to be close to true widths.

Nickel and copper values expressed as XRF readings are based on portable XRF analysis. They are preliminary in nature and a conclusive determination of the nickel, copper, cobalt and PGE values of the sulphide mineralisation will be confirmed when laboratory assays are available.

Average XRF readings in massive sulphide intervals are based on at least four readings per metre and are not length and density weighted. Metal content for intervals of disseminated sulphides are not accurately determined by portable XRF analysis and estimates for this style of mineralisation are based on geological logging.

Hole ID GDA94_51 East GDA94_51
North
Hole
Depth
(m)
Dip Azi Target
Depth
(m)
Target
MAD108 231218 6806453 250 -76 33 205 Test MAD98: X1
plate
MAD109 231422 6806421 160 -80 73 135 Test MAD100:X3
plate
MAD110 231422 6806421 170 -77 338 155 Test MAD100:X2
plate
MAD111 231482 6806487 210 -81 210 185 Test MAD100: X1
plate
MAD112 232000 6806555 140 -58 174 110 Test MAD101: X1
plate
MAD113 233696 6807050 200 -70 185 180 Test MAD102: X1
plate
MAD114 231218 6806453 250 -78 30 205 Test MAD108
plate
MAD115 230784 6806322 150 -68 290 110 Test west of $M in
MAD37/34
MAD116 231482 6806487 240 -76 315 190 Test MAD111:X1
plate
MAD117 232000 6806555 140 -60 180 110 Test MAD112 Plate

6

ASX / MEDIA RELEASE

==> picture [119 x 55] intentionally omitted <==

MAD118 231482 6806487 220 -78 301 190 Test MAD111:X1
plate
MAD119 231200 6806700 350 -75 180 280 Deep step-out
MAD60 Section
MAD120b 231450 6806570 240 -80 185 190 MAD111:X1 plate -
north dip extent
MAD121 231400 6806700 320 -75 180 260 Deep step-out
MAD111 Section
MAD122 231175 6806450 200 -75 180 160 Test 50 west of
MAD60 $M
MAD123 231482 6806488 220 -75 311 180 Test MAD116:X1
plate
MAD124 231483 6806486 220 -79 290 190 Test MAD116:X2
plate
MAD125 231447 6806570 210 -73 186 180 Test MAD120b:X1
plate
MAD126 6806517 210 -90 0 185 Test MAD120b:X1
plate
231445
MAD127 231440 6806515 210 -90 0 185 S-SW extension of
$M in MAD126
MAD128 6806505 200 -90 0 187 Up dip continuity
of $M in MAD126
231452
MAD129 231220 6806350 130 -75 180 90 Infill MAD38 to
MAD60 $M
MAD130 6806400 150 -75 180 90 West of MAD60
Line
231100
MAD131 231625 6806400 130 -75 180 120 Infill MAD31 and
MAD47 $M
MAD132 6806509 210 -90 0 190 10m SW extension
of $M in MAD127
231432
MAD133 231450 6806519 205 -90 0 185 20m SW extension
of $M in MAD127
MAD134 6806523 215 -90 0 190 NW extension of
$M in MAD127
231440
MAD135 231232 6806581 270 -85 180 240 MAD119:X1
conductor
MAD136 6806400 160 -90 0 145 NE extension of
MAD60 $M
231234
MAD137 231220 6806395 160 -90 0 145 SW extension of
MAD60 $M
MAD138 6806520 230 -75 180 160 60m east of
MAD62
231650

Table 2 – drill holes for the current drill programme at Mt Alexander, completed and in progress. Additional drill holes will be added to this programme as results are reviewed.

7

ASX / MEDIA RELEASE

==> picture [119 x 55] intentionally omitted <==

About the Mt Alexander Project:

The Mt Alexander Project is located 120km south-southwest of the Agnew-Wiluna Belt, which hosts numerous world-class nickel deposits. The Project comprises five granted exploration licences – E29/638, E29/548, E29/962, E29/954 and E29/972.

The Cathedrals, Stricklands and Investigators nickel-copper-cobalt-PGE discoveries are located on E29/638, which is held in joint venture by St George Mining Limited (75%) and Western Areas Limited (25%). St George is the Manager of the Project, with Western Areas retaining a 25% non-contributing interest in the Project (in regard to E29/638 only) until there is a decision to mine.

For further information, please contact:

John Prineas Peter Klinger Executive Chairman Media and Investor Relations St George Mining Limited Cannings Purple +61 (0) 411 421 253 +61 (0) 411 251 540 [email protected] [email protected]

Competent Person Statement:

The information in this report that relates to Exploration Targets, Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Mr Benjamin Pollard, a Competent Person who is a Member of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Pollard is a director of Cadre Geology and Mining Pty Ltd which has been retained by St George Mining Limited to provide technical advice on mineral projects.

Mr Pollard has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Pollard consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

8

The following sections are provided for compliance with requirements for the reporting of exploration results under the JORC Code, 2012 Edition.

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections)

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Sampling
techniques
Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels,
random chips, or specific specialised industry
standard measurement tools appropriate to the
minerals under investigation, such as down hole
gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments,
etc.). These examples should not be taken as
limiting the broad meaning of sampling.
The sections of the core that are selected for assaying are marked up
and then recorded on a sample sheet for cutting and sampling at the
certified assay laboratory. Samples of HQ or NQ2 core are cut just to
the right of the orientation line where available using a diamond core
saw, with half core sampled lengthways for assay.
Include reference to measures taken to ensure
sample representivity and the appropriate
calibration of any measurement tools or
systems used.
Wherever possible the same side of the drill core is sampled to ensure
sample is representative. Appropriate QAQC samples are inserted
into the sequences as per industry best practice.
Aspects of the determination of mineralisation
that are Material to the Public Report.
In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has
been done this would be relatively simple (eg
‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1
m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to
produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other
cases more explanation may be required, such
as where there is coarse gold that has inherent
sampling problems. Unusual commodities or
mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules)
may warrant disclosure of detailed information.
Diamond core (both HQ and NQ2) is half‐core sampled to geological
boundaries no more than 1.5m and no less than 10cm. Samples less
than 3kg are crushed to 10mm, dried and then pulverised to 75µm.
Samples greater than 3kg are first crushed to 10mm then finely
crushed to 3mm and input into the rotary splitters to produce a
consistent output weight for pulverisation.
Pulverisation produces a 40g charge for fire assay. Elements
determined from fire assay are gold (Au), platinum (Pt) and palladium
(Pd) with a 1ppb detection limit. To determine other PGE
concentrations (Rh, Ru, Os, Ir) a 25g charge for nickel sulphide collect
fire assay is used with a 1ppb detection limit.
Other elements will be analysed using an acid digest and an ICP finish.
These elements are: Ag, Al, As, Bi, Ca, Cd, Co, Cr, Fe, K, Li, Mg, Mn,
Mo, Nb, Ni, P, Pb, S, Sb, Sn, Te, Ti, V, W, Zn. The sample is digested
with nitric, hydrochloric, hydrofluoric and perchloric acids to effect as
near to total solubility of the sample as possible. The sample is then
analysed using ICP‐AES or ICP‐MS.
LOI (Loss on Ignition) will be completed on selected samples to
determine the percentage of volatiles released during heating of
samples to 1000°C.
Drilling
techniques
Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open‐hole
hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic,
etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or
standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face‐
sampling bit or other type, whether core is
oriented and if so, by what method, etc).
Diamond drilling is completed using HQ sized coring equipment
through the weathered zone (mostly saprock) with 3m barrels, and
then HQ or NQ2 in fresh rock with 3m or 6m barrels as required. The
core is oriented using ACT II electric core orientation.
Drill sample
recovery
Method of recording and assessing core and
chip sample recoveries and results assessed.
Diamond core recoveries are recorded during drilling and reconciled
during the core processing and geological logging. The core length
recovered is measured for each run and recorded which is used to
calculate core recovery as a percentage.
Measures taken to maximise sample recovery
and ensure representative nature of the
samples.
Measures taken to maximise core recovery include using appropriate
core diameter and shorter barrel length through the weathered zone,
which at Cathedrals and Investigators is mostly <20m and Stricklands
<40m depth. Primary locations for core loss in fresh rock are on
geological contacts and structural zones, and drill techniques are
adjusted accordingly, and if possible these zones are predicted from
the geological modelling.

1

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Whether a relationship exists between sample
recovery and grade and whether sample bias
may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain
of fine/coarse material.
No sample recovery issues have yet been identified that would
impact on potential sample bias in the competent fresh rocks that
host the mineralised sulphide intervals.
Logging Whether core and chip samples have been
geologically and geotechnically logged to a level
of detail to support appropriate Mineral
Resource estimation, mining studies and
metallurgical studies.
Geological logging is completed for all drill holes with lithology,
alteration, mineralisation, structure and veining recorded. The
logging is recorded digitally and imported in the St George Mining
central database.
Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in
nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc.)
photography.
Logging is both qualitative and quantitative depending on the field
being captured. Core is photographed with one tray per photo and
stored digitally.
The total length and percentage of the relevant
intersections logged.
All drill holes are geologically logged in full.
Sub‐sampling
techniques and
sample
preparation
If core, whether cut or sawn and whether
quarter, half or all core taken.
The HQ and NQ2 core is cut in half length ways just to the right of the
orientation line where available using a diamond core saw. All
samples are collected from the same side of the core where
practicable.
If non‐core, whether riffled, tube sampled,
rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or
dry.
Reverse circulation holes have been rotary cone split, and wetness
recorded during drilling.
For all sample types, the nature, quality and
appropriateness of the sample preparation
technique.
The entire sample is pulverised to 75µm using LM5 pulverising mills.
Samples are dried, crushed and pulverized to produce a homogenous
representative sub‐sample for analysis. A grind quality target of 90%
passing 75µm is used.
Quality control procedures adopted for all sub‐
sampling stages to maximise representivity of
samples.
Quality control procedures include submission of Certified Reference
Materials (standards), duplicates and blanks with each sample batch.
QAQC results are routinely reviewed to identify and resolve any
issues.
Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is
representative of the in situ material collected,
including for instance results for field
duplicate/second‐half sampling.
Duplicate samples are selected during sampling. Samples comprise
two quarter core samples, or for RC comprise a one meter sample
equally split into two bags and taken at set meter intervals.
Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the
grain size of the material being sampled.
The sample sizes are considered to be appropriate for base metal
sulphide mineralisation and associated geology.
Quality of
assay data and
laboratory
tests
The nature, quality and appropriateness of the
assaying and laboratory procedures used and
whether the technique is considered partial or
total.
Diamond core samples are analysed for Au, Pt and Pd using a 40g lead
collection fire assay; for Rh, Ru, Os, Ir using a 25g nickel sulphide
collection fire assay; and for Ag, Al, As, Bi, Ca, Cd, Co, Cr, Fe, K, Li, Mg,
Mn, Mo, Nb, Ni, P, Pb, S, Sb, Sn, Te, Ti, V, W, Zn using a four acid digest
and ICP‐AES or MS finish. The assay method and detection limits are
appropriate for analysis of the elements required.
For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld
XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in
determining the analysis including instrument
make and model, reading times, calibrations
factors applied and their derivation, etc.
A handheld XRF instrument (Olympus Innov‐X Spectrum Analyser) is
used to systematically analyse the drill core and RC sample piles
onsite. One reading is taken per meter, however for any core samples
with matrix or massive sulphide mineralisation then multiple samples
are taken at set intervals per meter. The instruments are serviced and
calibrated at least once a year. Field calibration of the XRF instrument
using standards is periodically performed (usually daily).
The handheld XRF results are only used for preliminary assessment
and reporting of element compositions, prior to the receipt of assay
results from the certified laboratory.

2

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Nature of quality control procedures adopted
(eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external
laboratory checks) and whether acceptable
levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and precision
have been established.
Laboratory QAQC involves the use of internal lab standards using
certified reference material (CRMs), blanks and pulp duplicates as
part of in house procedures. The Company also submits a suite of
CRMs, blanks and selects appropriate samples for duplicates.
Sample preparation checks for fineness are performed by the
laboratory to ensure the grind size of 90% passing 75µm is being
attained.
Verification of
sampling and
assaying
The verification of significant intersections by
either independent or alternative company
personnel.
Significant intersections are verified by the Exploration Manager of St
George Mining.
The use of twinned holes. No twin holes are currently planned for the upcoming drill program.
Documentation of primary data, data entry
procedures, data verification, data storage
(physical and electronic) protocols.
Primary data is captured onto a laptop using acQuire software and
includes geological logging, sample data and QA/QC information. This
data, together with the assay data, is entered into the St George
Mining central SQL database which is managed by external
consultants.
Discuss any adjustment to assay data. No adjustments or calibrations will be made to any primary assay data
reported.
Location of
data points
Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate
drill holes (collar and down‐hole surveys),
trenches, mine workings and other locations
used in Mineral Resource estimation.
Drill holes have been located and pegged using a DGPS system with
an expected accuracy of +/‐0.05mmm for easting, northing and
elevation.
Downhole surveys are conducted using a single shot camera
approximately every 30m during drilling to record and monitor
deviations of the hole from the planned dip and azimuth. Post‐drilling
downhole gyroscopic surveys will be conducted, which provide more
accurate survey results.
Specification of the grid system used. The grid system used at the Mt Alexander project is GDA94 (MGA),
zone 51.
Quality and adequacy of topographic control. Elevation data has been acquired using DGPS surveying at individual
collar locations and entered into the central database. A topographic
surface has been created using this elevation data.
Data spacing
and
distribution
Data spacing for reporting of Exploration
Results.
The diamond drill program is testing modelled EM conductors and
geological
criteria
for
massive
nickel‐copper‐PGE
sulphide
mineralisation. The spacing and distribution of the planned drill holes
is appropriate to test the defined targets.
Whether the data spacing and distribution is
sufficient to establish the degree of geological
and grade continuity appropriate for the
Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation
procedure(s) and classifications applied.
The completed drilling at Cathedrals, Stricklands and Investigators is
not sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade
continuity to support the definition of Mineral Resource and Reserves
and the classifications applied under the 2012 JORC code.
Whether sample compositing has been applied. No compositing has been applied to the exploration results.
Orientation of
data in relation
to geological
structure
Whether the orientation of sampling achieves
unbiased sampling of possible structures and
the extent to which this is known, considering
the deposit type.
Drill holes are planned as perpendicular as possible to the target EM
plates and geological units to approximate true width. Most of the
ultramafic units in the Cathedrals Belt dip shallow to the north (and
occasionally south) and where possible drill holes are planned to
intersect perpendicular to this dip. The orientation of key structures
may be locally variable.

3

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
If the relationship between the drilling
orientation and the orientation of key
mineralised structures is considered to have
introduced a sampling bias, this should be
assessed and reported if material.
No orientation based sampling bias has been identified in the data to
date.
Sample
security
The measures taken to ensure sample security. Chain of custody is managed by St George Mining. Core samples are
stored in the secure facilities at Bureau Veritas laboratory in Perth.
Transportation of core is managed by St George contractors and
Bureau Veritas and actively track monitored.
Audits or
reviews
The results of any audits or reviews of sampling
techniques and data.
No audits or reviews have been conducted at this stage.

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Mineral
Tenement and
Land Status
Type, name/reference number, location and
ownership including agreements or material
issues with third parties including joint ventures,
partnerships, overriding royalties, native title
interests, historical sites, wilderness or national
park and environmental settings.
The security of the tenure held at the time of
reporting along with any known impediments to
obtaining a licence to operate in the area.
The Mt Alexander Project is comprised of five granted Exploration
Licences (E29/638, E29/548, E29/954, E29/962 and E29/972).
Tenement E29/638 is held in Joint Venture between St George (75%
interest) and Western Areas (25% interest). E29/638 and E29/548 are
also subject to a royalty in favour of a third party that is outlined in
the ASX Release dated 17 December 2015 (as regards E29/638) and
the ASX release dated 18 September 2015 (as regards E29/548).
No environmentally sensitive sites have been identified on the
tenements. A registered Heritage site known as Willsmore 1 (DAA
identification 3087) straddles tenements E29/548 and E29/638. All
four tenements are in good standing with no known impediments..
Exploration
Done by Other
Parties
Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration
by other parties.
Exploration on tenements E29/638 and E29/962 has been largely for
komatiite‐hosted nickel sulphides in the Mt Alexander Greenstone
Belt. Exploration in the northern section of E29/638 (Cathedrals Belt)
and also limited exploration on E29/548 has been for komatiite‐
hosted Ni‐Cu sulphides in granite terrane. No historic exploration has
been identified on E29/954 or E29/972.
High grade nickel‐copper‐PGE sulphides were discovered at the Mt
Alexander Project in 2008. Drilling was completed to test co‐incident
electromagnetic (EM) and magnetic anomalies associated with
nickel‐PGE enriched gossans in the northern section of current
tenement E29/638. The drilling identified high grade nickel‐copper
mineralisation in granite‐hosted ultramafic units and the discovery
was named the Cathedrals Prospect.
Geology Deposit type, geological setting and style of
mineralisation
The Mt Alexander Project is at the northern end of a western
bifurcation of the Mt Ida Greenstones. The greenstones are bound to
the west by the Ida Fault, a significant Craton‐scale structure that
marks the boundary between the Kalgoorlie Terrane (and Eastern
Goldfields Superterrane) to the east and the Youanmi Terrane to the
west.
The Mt Alexander Project is prospective for further high‐grade
komatiite‐hosted nickel‐copper‐PGE mineralisation (both greenstone
and granite hosted) and also precious metal mineralisation (i.e.
orogenic gold) that is typified elsewhere in the Yilgarn Craton.
Drill hole
information
A summary of all information material to the
understanding of the exploration results
including
tabulation
of
the
following
information for all Material drill holes:
• Easting and northing of the drill hole collar
•Elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation
above sea level in meters) of the drill hole collar
Drill hole collar locations are shown in the maps and tables included
in the body of the relevant ASX release.

4

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
• Dip and azimuth of the hole
• Down hole length and interception depth
• Hole length
Data
aggregation
methods
In reporting Exploration Results, weighting
averaging
techniques,
maximum
and/or
minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of high
grades) and cut‐off grades are usually Material
and should be stated.
Reported assay intersections are length and density weighted.
Significant intersections are determined using both qualitative (i.e.
geological logging) and quantitative (i.e. lower cut‐off) methods.
For massive sulphide intersections, the nominal lower cut‐off is 2%
for either nickel or copper. For disseminated, blebby and matrix
sulphide intersections the nominal lower cut‐off for nickel is 0.3%.
Where aggregated intercepts incorporate short
lengths of high grade results and longer lengths
of low grade results, the procedure used for such
aggregation should be stated and some typical
examples of such aggregations should be shown
in detail.
Any high‐grade sulphide intervals internal to broader zones of
sulphide mineralisation are reported as_included_intervals.
Any disseminated, matrix, brecciated or stringer sulphides with
(usually) >1% nickel or copper on contact with massive sulphide
mineralisation are grouped with the massive sulphides for calculating
significant intersections and the massive sulphide mineralisation is
reported as an_including_intersection.
The assumptions used for any reporting of
metal equivalent values should be clearly
stated.
No metal equivalent values have yet been used for reporting
exploration results.
Relationship
between
mineralisation
widths and
intercept
lengths
These relationships are particularly important in
the reporting of exploration results.
If the geometry of the mineralisation with
respect to the drill hole angle is known, its
nature should be reported. If it is not known and
only the down hole lengths are reported, there
should be a clear statement to this effect (e.g.
down hole length, true width not known).
Assay intersections are reported as down hole lengths. Drill holes are
planned as perpendicular as possible to intersect the target EM plates
and geological targets so downhole lengths are usually interpreted to
be near true width.
Diagrams Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and
tabulations of intercepts should be included for
any significant discovery being reported. These
should include, but not be limited to a plane
view of drill hole collar locations and
appropriate sectional views.
A prospect location map, cross section and long section are shown
in the body of relevant ASX Releases.
Balanced
Reporting
Where
comprehensive
reporting
of
all
Exploration
Results
is
not
practical,
representative reporting of both low and high
grades and/or widths should be practiced to
avoid misleading reporting Exploration Results.
The exploration results reported are representative of the
mineralisation style with grades and/or widths reported in a
consistent manner.
Other
substantive
exploration
data
Other exploration data, if meaningful and
material, should be reported including (but not
limited to): geological observation; geophysical
survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk
samples – size and method of treatment;
metallurgical
test
results;
bulk
density,
groundwater,
geotechnical
and
rock
characteristics;
potential
deleterious
or
contaminating substances.
All material or meaningful data collected has been reported.
Appendix A contains details of significant intersections at the
Investigators Prospect announced by the Company.
Further Work The nature and scale of planned further work
(e.g. tests for lateral extensions or depth
extensions or large – scale step – out drilling).
Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of
possible
extensions,
including
the
main
geological interpretations and future drilling
areas, provided this information is not
commercially sensitive.
Further exploration in the Cathedrals Belt is currently being planned
based on results from the recent drill program. Further exploration is
also warranted north of the Cathedrals Belt on E29/548, and also in
the Mt Alexander greenstone belt to the south.

5

Hole ID GDA94
East
GDA94
North
Dip Azimuth Depth
(m)
From
(m)
To (m) Width
(m)
Ni% Cu% Co% Total
PGEs
**g/t **
Au
g/t
Ag
g/t
MAD29 231559.5 6806419.6 ‐60 160 201.6 104.00 105 1 0.36 0.18 0.01 1.02 0.12 1.50
MAD31 231559.4 6806416.5 ‐63 133 160 108.00 111.67 3.67 0.56 0.28 0.02 1.22 0.16 1.98
MAD31 111.67 113.24 1.57 6.26 2.71 0.18 4.91 0.19 8.10
Including 112.08 113.09 1.01 7.98 3.13 0.22 5.90 0.14 9.06
MAD32 232040.2 6806403 ‐73 220 92.7 44 51.6 7.6 0.44 0.19 0.02 0.59 0.03 0.88
MAD32 51.6 53.52 1.92 4.58 1.52 0.14 3.83 0.12 4.43
Including 52.75 53.52 0.77 7.82 2.50 0.24 6.31 0.13 6.82
MAD33 232038.2 6806412 ‐57 330 129.7 87.45 96.48 9.03 0.43 0.14 0.02 0.44 0.03 1.08
MAD33 96.48 97.49 1.01 5.81 2.33 0.22 4.32 0.12 7.30
MAD34 230769 6806330 ‐70 25 152.5 94 96.1 2.1 0.52 0.25 0.02 0.57 0.07 2.04
MAD34 96.1 98.89 2.79 1.63 0.53 0.05 1.24 0.11 3.62
Including 98.7 98.89 0.19 7.34 1.53 0.22 3.27 0.05 24.00
MAD37 230772.7 6806327 ‐84 335 156 110 122 12 0.41 0.13 0.02 0.35 0.04 1.22
MAD37 122 123.27 1.27 5.63 2.16 0.17 3.86 0.10 6.83
Including 122.55 123.27 0.72 7.93 2.75 0.23 4.81 0.07 9.00
And, Including 123.27 123.6 0.33 0.81 0.69 0.03 2.33 0.14 2.50
MAD38 231205.1 6806248 ‐70 90 65.5 25.4 28.14 2.74 3.77 1.48 0.10 3.85 0.17 5.49
Including 26.3 26.4 0.1 12.80 5.54 0.25 11.52 0.38 36.50
And, Including 27.6 28.14 0.54 8.59 3.43 0.24 6.73 0.14 10.00
MAD40 231575.7 6806427 ‐68 160 142.3 105.35 106.79 1.44 0.46 0.16 0.02 0.60 0.07 1.32
MAD40 106.79 108.75 1.96 5.09 2.11 0.16 3.46 0.39 6.04
Including 107.75 108.75 1 7.88 3.11 0.24 5.04 0.53 8.00
MAD43 231528.9 6806508 ‐70 160 180 149.7 157.22 7.52 0.43 0.20 0.02 0.55 0.05 1.13
MAD43 157.22 157.9 0.68 7.09 2.73 0.23 3.54 0.14 9.50
MAD43 170.43 170.53 0.1 4.25 0.98 0.13 2.91 0.11 6.00
MAD43 171.1 171.25 0.15 1.88 1.27 0.06 1.65 0.11 6.50
MAD44 231482.4 6806488 ‐70 180 180 155.66 156.11 0.45 5.59 1.27 0.18 4.28 0.24 11.70
Including 155.84 156.11 0.27 8.49 1.67 0.27 5.24 0.20 16.50
MAD45 231004.9 6806368 ‐81 355 229 174 178.23 4.23 0.39 0.13 0.02 0.35 0.04 0.85
MAD45 178.23 180.14 1.91 3.60 1.04 0.11 2.56 0.19 2.71
Including 178.87 179.08 0.21 5.44 0.51 0.17 2.55 0.09 2.50
And, Including 179.76 180.14 0.38 7.10 2.84 0.21 5.42 0.21 7.00
MAD47 231659.8 6806394 ‐70 175 142.1 42.2 43 0.8 1.77 2.85 0.05 4.31 0.21 8.34
Including 42.2 42.35 0.15 0.92 6.85 0.02 5.35 0.24 21.00
And, Including 42.9 43 0.1 7.54 7.02 0.28 10.04 0.33 14.00
MAD47 231659.8 6806394 ‐70 175 142.1 43.95 44.2 0.25 1.65 0.74 0.03 2.71 0.13 2.50
MAD48 231559.7 6806410 ‐70 181 127.1 89.35 91.98 2.63 0.58 0.33 0.02 0.97 0.10 4.36
MAD48 91.98 92.89 0.91 7.23 2.42 0.20 4.51 0.18 8.00
MAD60 231225.2 6806451 ‐70 178 190 156 157.9 1.9 0.60 0.28 0.02 1.49 0.29 2.63
MAD60 157.9 163.2 5.3 4.95 2.75 0.16 4.55 0.25 8.95
Including 159.38 162.38 3 6.40 3.55 0.21 5.25 0.17 12.18
And, Including 162.9 163.2 0.3 5.93 3.54 0.20 4.36 0.12 11.00
MAD61 231249.4 6806423 ‐70 180 160.1 133 135.6 2.6 0.37 0.17 0.01 0.48 0.04 0.65
MAD61 135.94 136.18 0.24 0.73 0.61 0.02 1.64 0.14 2.50

6

MAD62 231587.4 6806445 ‐70 0 220 195.84 197.25 1.41 0.82 0.31 0.04 0.92 0.07 1.28
MAD62 197.25 197.56 0.31 6.07 2.81 0.23 2.94 0.03 6.50
MAD63 230796.9 6806312 ‐75 355 128.1 106 110.33 4.33 0.81 0.35 0.03 1.26 0.17 2.66
MAD63 110.33 110.62 0.29 7.73 2.57 0.24 3.26 0.04 5.50
MAD63 110.62 110.77 0.15 0.82 1.05 0.03 6.13 0.08 3.50
MAD72 231242.1 6806418 ‐75 180 154.7 131.3 135.79 4.49 0.38 0.09 0.02 0.28 0.02 0.55
MAD72 135.79 136 0.21 5.90 0.32 0.19 1.08 0.01 3.00
MAD72 136 136.71 0.71 0.53 0.15 0.02 0.40 0.03 7.00
MAD72 136.71 136.96 0.25 6.23 7.48 0.21 2.52 0.01 18.00
MAD108 231218 6806453 ‐76 33 250 199 207.4 8.4 2.00 0.96 0.06 2.59 0.24 4.31
206.03 207.4 1.37 6.83 2.88 0.21 5.58 0.26 8.98
MAD112 232000 6806453 ‐58 174 140 116 119.55 3.55 4.67 2.27 0.20 2.94 0.16 7.14

7