AI assistant
ST GEORGE MINING LIMITED — Capital/Financing Update 2017
Mar 12, 2017
65782_rns_2017-03-12_f8d76c26-9ef9-4773-a414-76e8fc6abd17.pdf
Capital/Financing Update
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
ASX / MEDIA RELEASE
==> picture [119 x 55] intentionally omitted <==
13 March 2017
ST GEORGE ANNOUNCES 2017 GOLD PROGRAMME AT EAST LAVERTON PROJECT
HIGHLIGHTS:
-
Technical review by gold expert confirms the gold prospectivity of East Laverton
-
Gold prospects identified on each of the three major greenstone belts at East Laverton
-
Pipeline of drill targets being planned and prioritised
-
2017 gold drilling programme to commence in late March 2017
GOLD POTENTIAL AT EAST LAVERTON
St George Mining Limited (ASX: SGQ ) (‘St George Mining’ or ‘the Company’) is pleased to announce the 2017 gold exploration programme for its 100% owned East Laverton Project in Western Australia.
The 2016 gold drill programme at East Laverton was focused on the Ascalon and Bristol gold prospects. The drilling was successful in identifying the potential for gold mineralisation at and around these prospects, and has generated robust targets for follow-up drilling in 2017.
St George engaged Dr Walter Witt to review both the broader gold potential at East Laverton and to complete detailed assessments of the numerous gold targets at the Project. Dr Witt has over 40 years’ experience in exploration and is recognised as a leading expert on gold mineralisation and targeting in the Yilgarn Craton of Western Australia. In addition, Dr Witt is a Research Fellow at the Centre for Exploration Targeting (CET) where he has recently compiled a Yilgarn Gold Exploration Atlas for the CET and Geological Survey of Western Australia.
The technical review has confirmed the strong gold potential at East Laverton, and prioritised the multiple targets at the Project for exploration in 2017.
A reverse circulation (RC) drill programme will commence at East Laverton later this month and will initially focus on the highest rated targets in the Stella Range Belt, which are at Desert Dragon, Cambridge and Cambridge North.
A further announcement regarding the drill programme and drill targets will be issued soon.
St George Mining Executive Chairman, John Prineas said:
“Reconnaissance exploration by St George has recognised the significant gold potential at East Laverton. We are pleased to see this prospectivity confirmed by one of Western Australia’s leading gold experts.
“We will systematically progress gold exploration in 2017, working through the pipeline of attractive targets.
“With drilling due to start this month at both Mt Alexander and at East Laverton, we are entering a very exciting period for St George and its shareholders.“
1
ASX / MEDIA RELEASE
==> picture [119 x 55] intentionally omitted <==
The technical review by Dr Witt incorporated all the company’s digital database, including the significant geochemical data from past drilling and soil surveys. An integrated review of the geochemical data was completed utilising all relevant geological, structural and geophysical data.
Figure 1 illustrates the priority gold targets at East Laverton. Phase 1 of the 2017 gold drilling programme will focus on Bristol, Cambridge, Cambridge North and Desert Dragon.
==> picture [483 x 300] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 1 – the East Laverton tenements against FVD Bouguer gravity data with priority gold prospects highlighted.
CAMBRIDGE NORTH GOLD PROSPECT
The Cambridge North target is located on the northern extension of the Stella Range greenstone belt.
Historical shallow drilling at the prospect area has intersected significant gold anomalism that warrants follow-up exploration.
Of particular interest are two drill holes, SRAB081 and SRAB083, completed on the eastern magnetic trend. Drill hole SRAB081 intersected 3m @ 0.97g/t Au from 27m within a larger gold halo of 10m @ 0.37g/t Au. Drill hole SRAB083, drilled 80m to the northeast of SRAB081, intersected 3m @ 0.51g/t Au from 36m. The gold anomalism in both drill holes occurred at the end of hole.
Figure 2 illustrates the prospective target area on the strong eastern magnetic (and gravity) trend. Three extensive moving loop electromagnetic (MLEM) plates occur over 6km strike along this trend.
The proposed drill targets at Cambridge North are coincident with “breaks” in the MLEM anomalies. These “breaks” may be due to the structurally controlled hydrothermal alteration of iron and sulphur that may be associated with gold mineralisation.
2
ASX / MEDIA RELEASE
==> picture [119 x 55] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [483 x 382] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 2 – the Cambridge North prospect (against TMI magnetics). The eastern magnetic trend is prospective for gold mineralisation and is untested.
DESERT DRAGON GOLD PROSPECT
The Desert Dragon prospect was the highest ranked prospect in the technical review and has a number of compelling target areas for exploration.
Drill hole DDD010, completed by St George at Desert Dragon in 2014, intersected 6m @ 0.70g/t Au including 2m @ 1.42g/t Au from 149m. The gold mineralisation is associated with a sulphidic metasedimentary unit. The mineralised horizon is also intersected in DDRC049 (4m @ 0.3g/t Au), which is 100m east of DDD010.
Two prominent folds of the greenstone belt are situated in the Desert Dragon area, with the DDD010 gold target located on the limb of southern fold.
Drill holes are also being planned to test the hinges of these fold structures, which are prospective trap sites for gold mineralisation.
3
ASX / MEDIA RELEASE
==> picture [119 x 55] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [483 x 381] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 3 – the DDD010 and fold hinge targets against Bouguer gravity data.
EAST LAVERTON - IMPORTANT REGIONAL LOCATION
St George’s East Laverton Project is located in the eastern margin of the North Eastern Goldfields of Western Australia.
Figure 4 illustrates the regional position of the East Laverton Project. It is surrounded by major gold mines with the +8MozAu Tropicana deposit to the east, the +6MozAu Gruyere deposit to the north and the world class Laverton gold field to the northwest.
The strong history of gold discoveries and favourable regional setting underlines the gold potential for the under-explored East Laverton Project to also host economic gold deposits.
4
ASX / MEDIA RELEASE
==> picture [119 x 55] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [483 x 480] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 4 – a regional map showing major gold projects and the location of the East Laverton Project
For further information, please contact:
John Prineas Colin Hay Executive Chairman Professional Public Relations St George Mining Limited (+61) 08 9388 0944 mob 0404 683 355 (+61) 411 421 253 [email protected] [email protected]
5
ASX / MEDIA RELEASE
==> picture [119 x 55] intentionally omitted <==
Competent Person Statement:
The information in this report that relates to Exploration Targets, Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Mr Timothy Hronsky, a Competent Person who is a Member of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Hronsky is employed by Essential Risk Solutions Ltd which has been retained by St George Mining Limited to provide technical advice on mineral projects.
Mr Hronsky has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Hronsky consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.
6
The following sections are provided for compliance with requirements for the reporting of exploration results under the JORC Code, 2012 Edition.
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections)
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Sampling | Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut | This ASX Release dated 13 March 2017 reports on a technical review |
| techniques | channels, random chips, or specific specialised | of the gold prospectivity at the East Laverton Project. |
| industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc.). |
This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling exploration work. |
|
| These examples should not be taken as limiting | ||
| the broad meaning of sampling. | ||
| Include reference to measures taken to ensure | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does | |
| sample representivity and the appropriate | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling | |
| calibration of any measurement tools or | exploration work. | |
| systems used. | ||
| Aspects of the determination of mineralisation | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does | |
| that are Material to the Public Report. | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling | |
| In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has | exploration work. | |
| been done this would be relatively simple (eg | ||
| ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain | ||
| 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to | ||
| produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other | ||
| cases more explanation may be required, such | ||
| as where there is coarse gold that has inherent | ||
| sampling problems. Unusual commodities or | ||
| mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) | ||
| may warrant disclosure of detailed |
||
| information. | ||
| Drilling | Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open‐ | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does |
| techniques | hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling |
| sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple | exploration work. | |
| or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face‐ | ||
| sampling bit or other type, whether core is | ||
| oriented and if so, by what method, etc). | ||
| Drill sample | Method of recording and assessing core and | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does |
| recovery | chip sample recoveries and results assessed. | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling |
| exploration work. | ||
| Measures taken to maximise sample recovery | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does | |
| and ensure representative nature of the | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling | |
| samples. | exploration work. | |
| Whether a relationship exists between sample | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does | |
| recovery and grade and whether sample bias | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling | |
| may have occurred due to preferential | exploration work. | |
| loss/gain of fine/coarse material. |
1
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Logging | Whether core and chip samples have been | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does |
| geologically and geotechnically logged to a | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling | |
| level of detail to support appropriate Mineral | exploration work. | |
| Resource estimation, mining studies and | ||
| metallurgical studies. | ||
| Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does | |
| in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling | |
| photography. | exploration work. | |
| The total length and percentage of the relevant | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does | |
| intersections logged. | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling | |
| exploration work. | ||
| Sub‐sampling | If core, whether cut or sawn and whether | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does |
| techniques and | quarter, half or all core taken. | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling |
| sample | exploration work. | |
| preparation | ||
| If non‐core, whether riffled, tube sampled, | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does | |
| rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling | |
| dry. | exploration work. | |
| For all sample types, the nature, quality and | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does | |
| appropriateness of the sample preparation | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling | |
| technique. | exploration work. | |
| Quality control procedures adopted for all sub‐ | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does | |
| sampling stages to maximise representivity of | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling | |
| samples. | exploration work. | |
| Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does | |
| representative of the in situ material collected, | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling | |
| including for instance results for field | exploration work. | |
| duplicate/second‐half sampling. | ||
| Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does | |
| grain size of the material being sampled. | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling | |
| exploration work. | ||
| Quality of | The nature, quality and appropriateness of the | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does |
| assay data and | assaying and laboratory procedures used and | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling |
| laboratory | whether the technique is considered partial or | exploration work. |
| tests | total. | |
| For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does | |
| XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling | |
| determining the analysis including instrument | exploration work. | |
| make and model, reading times, calibrations | ||
| factors applied and their derivation, etc. |
2
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Nature of quality control procedures adopted | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does |
|
| (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling |
|
| laboratory checks) and whether acceptable | exploration work. |
|
| levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and | ||
| precision have been established. | ||
| Verification of | The verification of significant intersections by | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does |
| sampling and | either independent or alternative company | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling |
| assaying | personnel. | exploration work. |
| The use of twinned holes. | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does | |
| not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling | ||
| exploration work. | ||
| Documentation of primary data, data entry | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does | |
| procedures, data verification, data storage | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling | |
| (physical and electronic) protocols. | exploration work. | |
| Discuss any adjustment to assay data. | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does | |
| not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling | ||
| exploration work. | ||
| Location of | Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does |
| data points | drill holes (collar and down‐hole surveys), | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling |
| trenches, mine workings and other locations | exploration work. |
|
| used in Mineral Resource estimation. | ||
| Specification of the grid system used. | The grid system used at the East Laverton Projecxt is GDA94 (MGA), | |
| zone 51. | ||
| Quality and adequacy of topographic control. | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does | |
| not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling | ||
| exploration work. | ||
| Data spacing | Data spacing for reporting of Exploration | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does |
| and | Results. | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling |
| distribution | exploration work. | |
| Whether the data spacing and distribution is | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does |
|
| sufficient to establish the degree of geological | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling |
|
| and grade continuity appropriate for the | exploration work. |
|
| Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation | ||
| procedure(s) and classifications applied. | ||
| Whether sample compositing has been applied. | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does |
|
| not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling | ||
| exploration work. | ||
| Orientation of | Whether the orientation of sampling achieves | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does |
| data in relation | unbiased sampling of possible structures and | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling |
| to geological | the extent to which this is known, considering | exploration work. |
| structure | the deposit type. |
3
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| If the relationship between the drilling | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does | |
| orientation and the orientation of key | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling | |
| mineralised structures is considered to have | exploration work. | |
| introduced a sampling bias, this should be | ||
| assessed and reported if material. | ||
| Sample | The measures taken to ensure sample security. | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does |
| security | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling | |
| exploration work. | ||
| Audits or | The results of any audits or reviews of sampling | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does |
| reviews | techniques and data. | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling |
| exploration work. |
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Mineral | Type, name/reference number, location and | The East Laverton Project comprises 28 exploration licences, and |
| Tenement and | ownership including agreements or material | details are available in the Company’s Quarterly Activities Report |
| Land Status | issues with third parties including joint | which can be found on our website at www.stgm.com.au. |
| ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. |
Each tenement is 100% owned by Desert Fox Resources Pty Ltd, a wholly owned subsidiary of St George Mining. Certain tenements are subject to a 2% Net Smelter Royalty in favour of a third party. |
|
| None of the tenements are the subject of a native title claim. No | ||
| The security of the tenure held at the time of | environmentally sensitive sites have been identified at any of the |
|
| reporting along with any known impediments | tenements. The tenements are in good standing; no known |
|
| to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. | impediments exist. | |
| Exploration | Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration | In 2012, BHP Billiton Nickel West Pty Ltd (Nickel West) completed a |
| Done by Other | by other parties. | reconnaissance RC (reverse circulation) drilling programme at the |
| Parties | East Laverton Property as part of the Project Dragon farm‐in | |
| arrangement between Nickel West and the Company. That farm‐in | ||
| arrangement has been terminated. The drilling programme | ||
| comprised 35 RC holes for 8,560m drilled. | ||
| The results from the Nickel West drilling programme were reported | ||
| by the Company in its ASX Release dated 25 October 2012 “Drill | ||
| Results at Project Dragon”. Drilling intersected primary nickel | ||
| sulphide mineralisation and established the presence of fertile, high | ||
| MgO ultramafic sequences at the East Laverton Property. | ||
| Prior to the Project Dragon drilling programme, there was no | ||
| systematic exploration for nickel sulphides at the East Laverton | ||
| Property. Historical exploration in the region was dominated by | ||
| shallow RAB and aircore drilling, much of which had been | ||
| incompletely sampled, assayed, and logged. This early work was | ||
| focused on gold rather than nickel sulphide exploration. | ||
| No previous exploration has been recorded at the Atlas gold | ||
| prospect. | ||
| Geology | Deposit type, geological setting and style of | The Company’s East Laverton Property located in the NE corner of |
| mineralisation | the Eastern Goldfields Province of the Archean Yilgarn Craton. The | |
| project area is proximally located to the Burtville‐Yarmana terrane | ||
| boundary and the paleo‐cratonic marginal setting is consistent with | ||
| the extensive komatiites found on the property. | ||
| The drilling at the East Laverton Property has confirmed extensive | ||
| strike lengths of high‐MgO olivine‐rich rocks across three major | ||
| ultramafic belts. Ultramafic rocks of this composition are known to | ||
| host high grade nickel sulphides. |
4
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Drill hole | A summary of all information material to the | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does |
| information | understanding of the exploration results | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling |
| including tabulation of the following |
exploration work. | |
| information for all Material drill holes: | ||
| • Easting and northing of the drill hole collar | ||
| •Elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation | ||
| above sea level in meters) of the drill hole collar | ||
| • Dip and azimuth of the hole | ||
| • Down hole length and interception depth | ||
| • Hole length | ||
| Data | In reporting Exploration Results, weighting | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does |
| aggregation | averaging techniques, maximum and/or |
not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling |
| methods | minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of | exploration work. |
| high grades) and cut‐off grades are usually | ||
| Material and should be stated. | ||
| Where aggregated intercepts incorporate short | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does | |
| lengths of high grade results and longer | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling | |
| lengths of low grade results, the procedure | exploration work. | |
| used for such aggregation should be stated and | ||
| some typical examples of such aggregations | ||
| should be shown in detail. | ||
| The assumptions used for any reporting of | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does | |
| metal equivalent values should be clearly | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling | |
| stated. | exploration work. | |
| Relationship | These relationships are particularly important | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does |
| between | in the reporting of exploration results. | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling |
| mineralisation widths and intercept lengths |
If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, |
exploration work. |
| there should be a clear statement to this effect | ||
| (e.g. down hole length, true width not known). | ||
| Diagrams | Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) | Relevant scaled and oriented maps are included in the body of the |
| and tabulations of intercepts should be | ASX Release. | |
| included for any significant discovery being | ||
| reported. These should include, but not be | ||
| limited to a plane view of drill hole collar | ||
| locations and appropriate sectional views. | ||
| Balanced | Where comprehensive reporting of all |
This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does |
| Reporting | Exploration Results is not practical, |
not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling |
| representative reporting of both low and high | exploration work. | |
| grades and/or widths should be practiced to | ||
| avoid misleading reporting Exploration Results. | ||
| Other | Other exploration data, if meaningful and | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does |
| substantive | material, should be reported including (but not | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling |
| exploration | limited to): geological observation; geophysical | exploration work. |
| data | survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk | |
| samples – size and method of treatment; | ||
| metallurgical test results; bulk density, |
||
| groundwater, geotechnical and rock |
||
| characteristics; potential deleterious or |
||
| contaminating substances. | ||
| Further Work | The nature and scale of planned further work | A discussion of further exploration work is contained in the body of |
| (e.g. tests for lateral extensions or depth | the ASX Release. |
5
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| extensions or large – scale step – out drilling). | ||
| Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of | ||
| possible extensions, including the main |
||
| geological interpretations and future drilling | ||
| areas, provided this information is not | ||
| commercially sensitive. |
6