AI assistant
ST BARBARA LIMITED — Annual Report 2012
Oct 21, 2012
65749_rns_2012-10-21_f35ac559-612b-43b9-b50e-36222b6b5866.pdf
Annual Report
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
St Barbara Limited ACN 009 165 066
Level 10, 432 St Kilda Road, Melbourne VIC 3004 Locked Bag 9, Collins Street East, Melbourne VIC 8003 Tel +61 3 8660 1900 Fax +61 3 8660 1999
www.stbarbara.com.au
==> picture [162 x 174] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [162 x 78] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [162 x 143] intentionally omitted <==
Notice of 2012 Annual General Meeting
The Annual General Meeting of the Company will be held at 11.00 am (Melbourne time) on Thursday 22 November 2012, in the State Library of Victoria Conference Centre, Entry 3 in La Trobe Street between Russell and Swanston Streets, Melbourne.
The 2012 Annual Report, Notice of Annual General Meeting and Proxy Form are attached, as distributed to shareholders today.
==> picture [135 x 55] intentionally omitted <==
Ross Kennedy Executive General Manager Corporate Services Company Secretary 22 October 2012
==> picture [161 x 242] intentionally omitted <==
1
==> picture [18 x 22] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [14 x 24] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [21 x 20] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [23 x 18] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [91 x 32] intentionally omitted <==
Annual Report 2012
==> picture [555 x 332] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
01 Introduction
04 Chairman and Managing Director & CEO’s Joint Report
06 Operations Report
08 Discovery and Growth
09 Chief Financial Offi cer’s Review
10 People, Environment, Safety & Social Responsibility
11 Board of Directors
12 Executives
13 Ore Reserves and Mineral Resources Statements
18 Corporate Governance
21 Financial Statements
----- End of picture text -----
Highlights
Gold Production 338,879 ounces – 31%
==> picture [228 x 88] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 350,000
----- End of picture text -----
Revenue $541 million – 50%
==> picture [229 x 89] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
0 150,000 300,000 450,000 600,000
----- End of picture text -----
==> picture [223 x 123] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
NPAT
$130 million – 90%
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
-90 -60 -30 0 30 60 90 120 150
----- End of picture text -----
==> picture [221 x 147] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
EPS
(1)
40 cents per share – 90%
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
-40 -20 0 20 40
(1) Shares adjusted for 6:1 consolidation in November 2010
----- End of picture text -----
2012 was an historic year for St Barbara. The Company delivered record production, profit and cash flow. On 7 September 2012, St Barbara acquired 100% of Allied Gold Mining Plc by way of a Scheme of Arrangement.
The acquisition adds the Simberi Operation and surrounding exploration areas in Papua New Guinea, and the Gold Ridge Operation, also with surrounding exploration areas, in the Solomon Islands to St Barbara’s operating and exploration portfolio.
St Barbara’s acquisition of Allied Gold has created a leading ASX listed mid-tier gold company. The internationally diversified group operates three long life mines and three treatment plants located in Australia, Papua New Guinea and the Solomon Islands.
The operations have significant production growth potential and the new exploration areas in the South West Pacific add sizeable attractive targets to St Barbara’s existing exploration suite.
Growth
St Barbara now has a diversified asset portfolio by location and mine type. No asset represents more than approximately 35% of the Ore Reserve base or contributes more than approximately 40% of pro-forma production for the 2013 financial year.
A number of immediate organic growth opportunities have been identified including increased gold production at Simberi and Gold Ridge, expansion of known ore bodies and exploration opportunities in proximity to current mining operations, as well as new greenfields prospects.
Combined Reserves[(1)] – 5.7 Moz
Combined FY13F Production[(2)] – Approx 435 koz
==> picture [215 x 175] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
20% 34%
36%
5%
3% 2%
Gwalia Tower Hill King of the Hills
----- End of picture text -----
==> picture [199 x 175] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
23% 42%
17%
13% 5%
Southern Cross Simberi Gold Ridge
----- End of picture text -----
(1) As at 30 June 2012 for Australian assets and as at 31 December 2011 for South West Pacific assets.
(2) Based on internal life of mine plans assuming no change in production as a result of the acquisition, subject to risks set out in the corresponding ASX announcement dated 29 June 2012.
Annual Report 2012 01
Introduction cont.
Combined group forecast to generate approximately 435,000[(2)] ounces of gold in FY13
02
The Company has a strong pipeline of gold projects. These span from greenfields exploration, to the extension of existing ore reserves, to increasing gold production, to strong stable production. The Gwalia mine is expected to generate strong cash flows and assist funding the optimisation of Simberi and Gold Ridge, as well as exploration opportunities.
A focus on lifting operations capabilities and systems has translated into reliable and improving operating performance at St Barbara’s Australian assets. Through the implementation of improved mine planning methodology, operating systems and cost management frameworks, the Company expects to achieve improved production reliability and unit cost reductions for Simberi and Gold Ridge.
The financial strength of the Australian operations has ensured that the new group has only moderate levels of debt, low gearing and significant upside exposure to the gold price. St Barbara has absorbed Allied Gold’s gold loan, and established robust new debt facilities with quality international lenders. As a larger, diversified company, St Barbara should enjoy increased investor interest, a higher stock market profile and improved share market liquidity.
Central to successful operations in Papua New Guinea and the Solomon Islands is maintaining the relationship between each operation, and national and provincial governments and local communities. St Barbara will work hard to ensure there is effective stakeholder engagement at all levels.
Each of these assets has an expected mine life in excess of nine years, with significant potential for mine life extensions. At the same time that operations at the Pacific assets are being improved, the dedicated Discovery and Growth team will be evaluating the greatly enlarged exploration portfolio to assess near mine opportunities, and targets on the highly prospective Pacific tenements.
Project Pipeline
==> picture [473 x 322] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Tabar – Tatau
Simberi Near Mine
Gold Ridge
Near Mine
Sullivan’s Creek Simberi Oxides
Yilgarn Targets Gold Ridge
Gwalia Region Southern Cross
Southern Cross King of the Hills
Simberi Oxide
East Lachlan Tower Hill Simberi Sulphides Gwalia
Expansion (3.5Mt)
Exploration Scoping/Concept Feasibility Construction Producing
Western Australia Papua New Guinea Solomon Islands
----- End of picture text -----
Annual Report 2012 03
==> picture [562 x 285] intentionally omitted <==
The Company’s strong operating performance in the 2012 financial year represents the culmination of a long period of focus on building capability across all the operating and support functions of the Company.
The combination of the Company’s strong operating performance and cash generation, coupled with the recently acquired Allied Gold Mining Plc (Allied Gold) long life gold projects and exciting development opportunities, provides an outstanding platform for long term growth as a leading mid tier ASX gold company.
Strategy to grow shareholder value
The Company’s Western Australian operations at Leonora are profitable and generating strong cash flows. For the 2012 financial year, a return on shareholder funds of 26% was achieved. This has provided a solid foundation for the Company to execute its stated strategy of growth through the acquisition of value accretive, long life gold assets.
The acquisition of Allied Gold is the culmination of a thorough two year evaluation of gold assets in Australasia, South East Asia and the South Western
Pacific Rim, with our management team rating Allied Gold as one of the best value targets, and located in a highly geologically attractive yet underexplored region. Following a thorough due diligence process, the Company determined that the acquisition of Allied Gold would be significantly value accretive for St Barbara shareholders. The Company’s offer was announced on 29 June 2012, and the acquisition was completed on 7 September 2012.
We remain confident that the Allied Gold operations will significantly improve in performance and that these improvements will progressively be reflected in the Company’s share price. Moreover, the extensive, yet under-explored land holdings along the highly prospective Pacific Rim, will be a key focus for exploration activities, with the objective of adding further significant value.
Strong operating capability
All three Western Australian gold operations performed at, or above expectations for the year, including King of the Hills in its first full year of operation.
Strong performance is expected from the Gwalia mine for the foreseeable future. The majority of ore mined is from the high grade South West Branch, which has a reserve grade estimated at 9.1 g/t Au. The mine is operating at its current design potential, with multiple working faces established and significant underground infrastructure.
04
At Southern Cross Operations, the Marvel Loch mine is nearing the end of its economic life after many years of continuous operation, including 7½ years under St Barbara control. Following a strong year of performance to guidance in the 2012 financial year, Southern Cross Operations is expected to go on to care and maintenance in the December 2012 quarter.
Translating production into profitability
Strong operating capabilities have been reflected in record gold production, net profit after tax, cash flow and earnings per share in the 2012 fiscal year.
Net cash flows from operations (before capital expenditure) increased by 115% to $222 million. Net cash flows from operations after funding capital expenditure was positive $122 million in the 2012 financial year.
During the year, cash on deposit increased by $106 million to $185 million as at 30 June 2012. Total interest bearing debt at balance date was less than $4 million.
Net profit after tax for the year of $130.2 million was 90% higher than the previous year profit of $68.6 million. Earnings per share increased from 21 cents per share to 40 cents per share.
Licence to operate
The Company’s values and performance based culture is attracting high calibre employees to the Company. Remuneration strategies are designed to align employee performance and rewards with growing shareholder value through a combination of short term and long term incentives.
Company initiatives during the year received recognition, including a Federal Government Award for promoting opportunities for women in the workplace and a Western Australian Government “Waterwise Business Gold Award” for water conservation at Southern Cross Operations.
The Company has worked closely with Leonora aboriginal communities to facilitate improved trustee arrangements for royalty entitlements.
Extensive environmental monitoring takes place to minimise disturbance to areas surrounding mining operations. A number of legacy mine sites on the Company’s tenements have been successfully rehabilitated.
A focus on safety leadership in the workplace, designed to identify and resolve risks before accidents occur, has helped underpin a significant improvement in safety performance. Southern Cross Operations in particular, achieved outstanding safety performance for the year with the Total Recordable Injury Frequency Rate for the Company reducing from 12.5 at the start of the year to 9.0 at the end of the year.
Careful attention to these important business foundations helps underpin effective relationships with the workforce, communities and government; all essential for long term profitable operations.
Significant opportunities to grow the business
The establishment of strong performing operations now enables management teams to focus on a number of business improvement opportunities. As noted in the opening pages of this Annual Report, a range of business improvement initiatives are planned for the Simberi and Gold Ridge Operations. There are also plans to improve truck haulage efficiencies and costs in the Gwalia mine using innovative truck haulage technology, improving stope cycle times and evaluating potential sources of further ore.
Significant shareholder value can be created through the discovery of new gold deposits. Prospective opportunities have already been identified in proximity to the Simberi and Gold Ridge gold mines. There are also significant targets on current land holdings elsewhere along the Pacific Rim, in the East Lachlan district of New South Wales and the Leonora region of Western Australia.
The strong cash flow from operations, in particular at Leonora, provides capacity for increased exploration activities and for follow up work should a discovery be made.
People are central to creating a successful company
We acknowledge the significant efforts of the executive team, employees, contractors and our fellow Directors throughout the year. These efforts are demonstrably translating into growing profitability, cash flow generation, significant returns on shareholder funds, creation of long term opportunities and development of a sustainable culture of excellence.
The year ahead
We will be applying established operating capabilities and systems to the new Simberi and Gold Ridge operations to lift production performance, lower operating costs and increase margins. We also look forward to drilling a number of targets on highly prospective, yet under-explored ground in nearby areas.
St Barbara is now not only one of Australia’s most profitable ASX listed gold companies, but one of the largest gold producers in the region with a pipeline of development and exploration opportunities.
==> picture [109 x 137] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [101 x 40] intentionally omitted <==
Colin Wise Chairman
==> picture [109 x 137] intentionally omitted <==
Tim Lehany Managing Director & CEO
Annual Report 2012 05
==> picture [562 x 285] intentionally omitted <==
Continued improvement in operational performance and reliability at our three underground mines and two processing plants in Western Australia saw gold production increase by 31% for the year to 338,879 ounces.
Production Summary
| Production Summary | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Production | 2012 | 2011 | |
| Leonora Operations | |||
| Gwalia King of the Hills |
oz oz |
184,534 56,953 |
131,133 7,066 |
| Southern Cross Operations Marvel Loch Consolidated |
oz oz |
97,392 338,879 |
120,275 258,474 |
| Milled Grade | |||
| Gwalia King of the Hills Marvel Loch |
g/t Au g/t Au g/t Au |
8.3 4.2 1.9 |
6.3 4.6 3.4 |
| Total Cash Operating Costs | |||
| Gwalia | $/oz | 646 | 765 |
| King of the Hills | $/oz | 753 | 699 |
| Southern Cross | $/oz | 1,199 | 890 |
Production from the high grade Gwalia mine increased by 41% to 184,534 ounces of gold and the mine is expected to maintain gold production at 175,000 to 190,000 ounces in the 2013 financial year.
The King of the Hills satellite mining operation at Leonora produced 56,953 ounces of gold in its first full year of production.
Southern Cross Operations, with the majority of ore sourced from the Marvel Loch mine, achieved production of 97,392 ounces of gold.
Leonora Operations
The Leonora Operations comprise the Gwalia and King of the Hills underground mines, and a processing plant at Gwalia.
Gwalia
The Gwalia mine at Leonora is St Barbara’s cornerstone asset. The Gwalia deposit has an Ore Reserve grade of 8.7 g/t Au, an expected mine life of at least nine years, and remains open at depth with some parallel lodes not yet fully drilled.
06
==> picture [390 x 143] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [169 x 142] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [390 x 139] intentionally omitted <==
The mining method at Gwalia includes long hole stoping and cement paste back fill, trucking ore and waste to the surface. Geotechnical stress measurements are amongst the lowest recorded at corresponding depths in the surrounding Yilgarn district of Western Australia.
As at 30 June 2012, the mine was developed down to 1,420 metres below surface, with vertical advance rates expected of 60 to 80 metres per annum for the next three years.
During the current financial year ore will continue to be sourced principally from the high grade South West Branch lode.
Net of production depletion, Gwalia Ore Reserves reduced by 48,000 ounces of contained gold to 6.9 million tonnes at 8.7 g/t Au for 1.9 million ounces of contained gold as at 30 June 2012, and now extends to 1,800 metres below surface.
A haulage optimisation study was completed during the year, including consideration of a hoisting shaft. Optimising truck haulage has been identified as the most efficient and cost effective outcome.
A new mining contract was awarded at the Gwalia mine to Byrnecut Mining Pty Ltd, commencing 1 September 2012, which will introduce innovative new trucking technology to the operation that offers significant efficiency improvements over the current haulage trucks.
King of the Hills
Southern Cross Operations
The King of the Hills underground mine is located at the site of the historical Tarmoola open pit. Gold production commenced in May 2011. The mine is expected to produce at the rate of 55,000 to 60,000 ounces of gold per annum for at least another two and a half years.
At Southern Cross Operations, ore was principally sourced from the Marvel Loch underground mine supplemented by low grade ore from stockpiles at former satellite deposits.
In the 2011 financial year, deep drilling of the Marvel Loch ore body identified thick, non-gold bearing pegmatite intrusions that cut the base lodes of the mine, and diminishing grades at depth in the northern lodes of the mine. As a consequence, underground mining operations at Marvel Loch are expected to cease in October 2012. The 2.2 million tonne per annum plant will then be placed in care and maintenance.
Ore mined is trucked 42 kilometres to the Gwalia processing plant for treatment to utilise the available processing capacity.
Revenue from King of the Hills is protected by put and call options providing a price collar of between A$1,425 and A$1,615 per ounce.
Gwalia Processing Plant
The processing plant performed consistently achieving an average recovery rate of 97% for the year for Gwalia ore.
Outlook for Continuing Australian Operations
| Forward Guidance FY13 | Gwalia King of the Hills |
Total Leonora |
|---|---|---|
| Gold production koz Cash operating cost $/oz Capital expenditure $M |
175–190 55–60 |
230–250 710–745 65–75 |
| 670–700 840–870 |
||
| 45–50 20–25 |
Annual Report 2012 07
==> picture [562 x 245] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [169 x 142] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [391 x 143] intentionally omitted <==
During the 2012 financial year, exploration focussed on drilling along the Gwalia Mine trend, extending the Gwalia Deeps ore body at Leonora, and drill testing near-mine targets in both Leonora and Southern Cross provinces as potential sources of material for the Gwalia and Marvel Loch plants.
Elsewhere, new prospective areas were identified using advanced geophysical techniques and three dimensional geological modelling in the Yilgarn province, Western Australia, and in the East Lachlan province, New South Wales. Systematic economic review, ranking, drilling and turning over of prospects continued throughout the year across the Company’s 5,000 km² portfolio of tenements.
Discovery & Growth expenditure for the year was over $20 million. Almost half the expenditure was spent on drilling and just over a third of this was spent on Gwalia Deeps drilling. A total of 40,350 metres of drilling was completed during the year.
Leonora
Gwalia Deeps
A third phase of deep drilling successfully extended Gwalia Mine lodes along the northern and southern margins at depth within the current mine interval, utilising directional drilling from previous drill holes. This drill program has successfully increased the Mineral Resources and converted a substantial proportion of existing Inferred Resources to Indicated Resources and to Ore Reserves. The updated Gwalia Deeps resource estimate is shown in Table 1 on page 15. The Gwalia deposit remains open at depth.
Gwalia Mine trend
Detailed geological studies and three dimensional modelling along the Gwalia mine trend generated a series of targets previously untested for Gwalia-style mineralisation. Following resolution of land access issues, a first phase program of 12 deep holes has been completed north and south of Gwalia mine. These drill holes have not intersected significant mineralisation and results are being compiled as the basis for an improved target model and second phase drill
08
Financial highlights
| Financial highlights | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30 June 2012 | 30 June 2011 | |
| $’000 | $’000 | |
| Sales revenue | 541,189 | 359,575 |
| EBITDA (including significant items) | 204,034 | 125,538 |
| EBIT (including significant items) | 106,811 | 67,058 |
| Statutory Profit(1) after tax for the year | 130,230 | 68,629 |
| Total net significant items | (552) | 14,198 |
| EBITDA (excluding significant items) | 218,963 | 111,340 |
| EBIT (excluding significant items) | 128,094 | 52,860 |
| Underlying net profit after tax(2) for the year | 130,782 | 54,431 |
(1) Statutory Profit is net profit after tax attributable to owners of the parent.
(2) Underlying net profit is net profit after income tax (“Statutory Profit”) excluding significant items.
for the Australian operations will fall further in the 2013 financial year.
St Barbara reported a strong performance with net profit after tax for the year ended 30 June 2012 increasing by 90% to $130.2 million. Increased gold production, rigorous cost management and higher gold prices drove underlying net profit after tax up by 140% to $130.8 million. Earnings per share increased from $0.21 to $0.40 in financial year 2012.
For the 2012 financial year a return on shareholder funds of 26% was achieved. The company is in a strong financial position with cash at balance date of $185.2 million and total interest bearing debt of only $4.3 million. This strong financial position has enabled the Company to fund the cash component of the consideration for Allied Gold from cash reserves and a four year term loan from NAB and Barclays.
Cash flow from operations more than doubled compared to the previous year to $221.8 million. Capital expenditure was lower than the previous year at $100.2 million, as major projects such as the development of King of the Hills were completed. Capital expenditure
The introduction of the Carbon Tax is anticipated to contribute to an increase in cash operating costs for Australian
testing. Geochemical drilling was completed on another four areas in the Leonora province to generate targets for drill testing in the current year.
East Lachlan, New South Wales
Following an initial drill program in the 2011 financial year targeting intrusive-related porphyry copper-gold mineralisation within a large volcanic complex, situated under younger cover rocks on the edge of the Great Artesian Basin, detailed geophysical gravity surveys and a helicopter-borne electromagnetic (EM) survey were completed to assist delineation of new drill targets. A second drilling program was largely completed, which intersected the targeted intrusions under cover. Although not all assay results have been received, no significant zone of mineralisation appears to have been intersected at this time.
Southern Cross
Drilling programs were completed on the Copperhead, Corinthia, Cornishman, Nevoria and Frasers projects along trend from the Marvel Loch mine. At Frasers, drilling extended a series of lodes plunging south of the previous open pit mine, and successfully delineated an Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate of 2.1 Mt @ 5.2 g/t Au containing 355,000 ounces gold (based on a 2.5 g/t Au cut-off grade).
However, insufficient mineral resources with potential to be converted into ore reserves have been identified, to provide the quantum of ore required to sustain continuing production at Southern Cross Operations.
Gawler, SA
Work on Exploration Licence EL4420 is still suspended due to the Federal Government moratorium placed on accessing the Woomera Protected Area, and it is unlikely to be lifted until at least the end of calendar year 2012. Targeting activities in other parts of the Gawler Block continued.
Further studies are being completed on Copperhead and Frasers to determine if additional drilling is justified.
operations of approximately $11 per ounce of production. Substantial focus remains on business improvement initiatives and cost efficiencies and this will be extended to Simberi and Gold Ridge in the coming year. Achieving reliable production and substantially lower operating costs at Simberi and Gold Ridge will deliver significant shareholder value in the medium term.
==> picture [109 x 137] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [60 x 72] intentionally omitted <==
Garth Campbell-Cowan Chief Financial Officer
Simberi Island, PNG and Gold Ridge, Solomon Islands
The successful acquisition of Allied Gold will be followed up in FY 2013 with extensional drilling of the known ore bodies at Simberi and Gold Ridge and evaluating the exploration potential of near-mine targets at each site.
Growth
The Discovery and Growth team continue to actively review and monitor other gold discoveries and projects in Australia and South East Asia. Evaluation of a number of potentially interesting projects was completed during the year, located both in Australia and offshore. In Australia, additional areas have been acquired in the Yilgarn province, WA and are likely to be a focus of continuing work in the 2013 financial year.
Completing detailed due diligence on the mineral resources and operating assets of Allied Gold located on Simberi Island, PNG and Guadalcanal, Solomon Islands was also a key focus during the year.
Annual Report 2012 09
People
The Company’s workforce as at 30 June 2012 comprised 275 employees and 644 contractors, predominately based in Western Australia. St Barbara continues to build a reputation for being a values based, people focused business, with strong accountabilities for performance.
The five strategic priorities are to:
-
ensure the Company has the appropriate talent to reliably deliver its business strategy;
-
ensure the Company maintains productive and direct relations with our people;
-
build capable leadership at all levels in the Company;
-
continue to develop integrated human resource systems; and
-
support the right work being done well at every level of the organisation.
Supporting these strategic priorities has required continuing development of our people systems.
A comprehensive Talent Management Framework has been implemented that strengthens our capacity to attract, motivate and retain capable people.
Close attention is paid to employment conditions such as competitive remuneration, quality village accommodation and industry benchmarked work rosters to assist in attracting and retaining a high performing workforce. Remuneration strategies are carefully designed to align employee performance with growing shareholder value.
Considerable effort is being put into gender diversity to promote the advancement of women in the workplace and make the Company an employer of choice for women. Board endorsed diversity objectives are published in the Corporate Governance Statement. In November 2011 these efforts were recognised with St Barbara being awarded the Directors Award for an Organisation in the Federal Government’s Equal Opportunity for Women in the Workplace Agency (EOWA) Business Achievement Awards.
Safety
St Barbara requires everyone to “start safe, stay safe” as part of its strong commitment to safety. We strive for constant awareness and continual safety improvements through numerous initiatives, including the daily application of the Positive Attitude Safety System (PASS™), Visual Leadership by managers and safety “Rules to Live By”. These
programs require everyone to proactively identify potential hazards and reduce risk taking behaviour.
During the year, the Company released a revised set of Health, Safety and Environment standards as part of its vision which includes a desire for safe production and environmental sustainability.
Safety performance at St Barbara improved during the 2012 financial year. The Company measures safety performance using a rolling 12-month average of the Total Recordable Injury Frequency Rate (TRIFR). The 12 month rolling average of the TRIFR was 9.0 at the end of June 2012, down from 12.5 at the start of the financial year.
Whilst this improvement in safety performance is most gratifying, we will not rest in our efforts to eliminate work place injuries. This intent is given effect in the workplace by the ongoing reinforcement of existing programs and the implementation of new initiatives that support further injury reduction targets in the current year.
Environment & Sustainability
Minimising the Company’s environmental impacts and maximising efficiencies in water and energy use remain a continuing Company focus. These efforts were rewarded during the reporting year, when the Company achieved a Gold Award for Water Efficiency at our Southern Cross Operations.
Further improvement in the Company’s performance will be assisted by the implementation of an Environmental Management System by the end of the year.
During the reporting period, the Clean Energy Regulator routinely audited St Barbara’s National Greenhouse and Energy Reports and confirmed the Company’s compliance. St Barbara is liable for payment of the carbon tax as a result of its power generation at Gwalia.
Rehabilitation
At Leonora Operations, rehabilitation of waste dumps at Tarmoola continued with a total of 95 hectares completed during the financial year. Capping of the southern cell of the old Tarmoola Tailings Storage Facility 4 was also commenced with approximately 85% completed by the end of June. Rehabilitation activities at Southern Cross Operations included 76 hectares being completed at GVG, Bronco and Treasury. Rehabilitation expenditure for the 2012 financial year totalled $3.7 million.
Rehabilitation priorities during the 2013 financial year for Southern Cross Operations will include continuing work on open pit legacy sites. Continuing work on waste dumps and the tailings dam at the Tarmoola mine site and the waste dumps at Kailis are the priorities for Leonora Operations.
Unconditional Environmental Performance Bonds of $18 million had been lodged with the Western Australian government as at 30 June 2012. The Western Australian government has passed legislation whereby, with effect from 1 July 2013, the requirement for rehabilitation bonds will be replaced with a rehabilitation contribution scheme, whereby contributions are made to a government fund.
Community & Social Responsibility
St Barbara continues to support the local communities where we operate. Community briefings are held from time to time as well as regular meetings with Local Government representatives to keep local communities informed of St Barbara’s activities and plans. The Company continues to recognise the traditional ownership of the lands on which we operate, and regularly meets with Aboriginal Groups associated with our areas of operation. Aboriginal heritage protection surveys were undertaken during the year with representatives of local Aboriginal groups at nine proposed exploration areas around Leonora. St Barbara was a Gold Sponsor for the annual Leonora Community “Golden Gift” weekend as well as providing in-kind support. The Company supported the Leonora District High School and Kalgoorlie South Primary School with sponsorships of the “You Can Do It” program and also sponsored the “Step Up” program event in Kalgoorlie involving students from regional high schools.
==> picture [219 x 153] intentionally omitted <==
10
==> picture [109 x 109] intentionally omitted <==
S J Colin Wise
LL.B, FAICD, FAusIMM
Chairman – Non Executive Appointed July 2004
Mr Wise is an experienced corporate lawyer, consultant and company director with significant expertise in the mining and exploration industry and resources, energy and corporate sectors. He spent 24 years with WMC Limited, 10 of which as General Counsel and subsequently, 4 years as Counsel to a New York law firm. He has extensive practical experience in Australia and internationally with a wide range of corporate, operational and legal matters.
He has been Chairman of St Barbara since mid 2004, and is a Fellow of both the Australian Institute of Company Directors and the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.
==> picture [37 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [37 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [37 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [37 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [37 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [37 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [37 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [37 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [37 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
Elizabeth A (Betsy) Donaghey B.Sc (Eng) M.S
Non Executive Director Appointed April 2011
Ms Donaghey is a civil engineer with extensive oil & gas industry and corporate experience. This included roles with BHP Billiton for 19 years in gas marketing, reservoir engineering and business planning and analysis.
More recently, Ms Donaghey spent 9 years with Woodside Energy in various senior gas business and strategic planning roles, culminating in Ms Donaghey’s executive leadership of Woodside Energy’s Australian business unit and subsequently the Browse business unit.
==> picture [109 x 109] intentionally omitted <==
Timothy J Lehany B.E., MBA, MAusIMM
Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer Appointed March 2009
Mr Lehany is a Mining Executive with extensive operating experience over the past 24 years in Australia and South East Asia with a number of mining companies, including Newcrest Mining Limited and WMC Ltd. He is a mining engineer, having held operating, and executive roles in gold, base metal and nickel mining. Tim held the position of Executive General Manager Operations with Newcrest Mining Limited prior to joining St Barbara.
==> picture [109 x 109] intentionally omitted <==
Phillip C Lockyer M.Sc, AWASM, DipMETALL
Non Executive Director Appointed December 2006
Mr Lockyer is an experienced mining engineer and metallurgist with over 40 years experience in the mineral industry with an emphasis on gold and nickel, in both underground and open pit operations. Mr Lockyer was employed by WMC Resources for 20 years, and as General Manager for WA was responsible for that Company’s nickel division and gold operations. Mr Lockyer also held the position of Director Operations for Dominion Mining Limited and Resolute Limited.
==> picture [108 x 109] intentionally omitted <==
Douglas W Bailey B.Bus (Acc), CPA, ACIS
Non Executive Director Appointed January 2006
Mr Bailey was the Chief Financial Officer of Woodside Petroleum Ltd between 2002 and 2004 and previously, was an Executive Director of Ashton Mining Limited from 1990 to 2000, including the last 3 years as Chief Executive Officer. He was also a Non Executive Director of Aurora Gold Ltd for the period 1993-2000.
==> picture [108 x 109] intentionally omitted <==
Robert K Rae B.Com (Hons), FAICD
Non Executive Director Appointed April 2008
Mr Rae is a Director and Partner of McClintock Associates, a private investment bank and advisory firm and has extensive industry and corporate experience. Mr Rae has held previous directorships within the mining industry, including Plutonic Resources Limited, Ashton Mining Limited, WA Diamond Trust and Centralian Minerals Limited. Mr Rae is also a member of the Salvation Army Advisory Board.
Annual Report 2012 11
==> picture [108 x 109] intentionally omitted <==
Timothy J Lehany B.E., MBA, MAusIMM
Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer
Tim was appointed in March 2009. He is a Mining Executive with extensive operating experience over the past 24 years in Australia and South East Asia with a number of mining companies, including Newcrest Mining Limited and WMC Ltd. He is a mining engineer, having held operating, and executive roles in gold, base metal and nickel mining. Tim held the position of Executive General Manager Operations with Newcrest Mining Limited prior to joining St Barbara.
==> picture [108 x 109] intentionally omitted <==
Ross Kennedy B.Com, Grad. Dip-Company Secretarial Practice, ACA, FTIA, FAICD, MAusIMM, ACIS
Executive General Manager Corporate Services and Company Secretary
Ross is a Chartered Secretary and has been with St Barbara since 2004. He has 25 years of experience in corporate administration, including 12 years in the minerals and resources sector, and 10 years of experience as a management consultant. Ross leads the Corporate Services team. Key responsibilities include designing and executing plans for investor relations, legal and compliance, risk management and ensuring that Company Secretariat functions continue to develop to support the Company’s growth.
==> picture [108 x 109] intentionally omitted <==
Garth Campbell-Cowan B.Com, Dip-Applied Finance & Investments, FCA
Chief Financial Officer
Garth is a Chartered Accountant with over 25 years of experience in finance and management positions across a number of different industries. He was appointed to the position of Chief Financial Officer in September 2006 and is responsible for the Company’s Finance function, covering financial reporting and accounting, treasury, taxation, business analysis, capital management, procurement and information technology. Garth also co-ordinates St Barbara’s strategy and planning activities. Prior to joining St Barbara, he was Director of Corporate Accounting at Telstra and has held senior finance leadership roles with WMC, Newcrest Mining and ANZ.
==> picture [108 x 109] intentionally omitted <==
Phil Uttley B.Sc. Hons. (Geol. & Mineral.), FAusIMM Executive General Manager Discovery and Growth
Phil is an experienced exploration executive with over 35 years of industry experience having held senior positions in Sino Gold, SRK Consulting and Renison Goldfields Consolidated (formerly Gold Fields). He has a B.Sc Hons. (Geol. & Mineral) from University of Queensland and is an experienced exploration geologist, with a demonstrated track record in gold discoveries and establishment of resources for gold production. Phil commenced with St Barbara in September 2009.
==> picture [37 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [37 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [37 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [37 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [37 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [37 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [37 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [37 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [37 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
Alistair Croll
B.Sc Mining Engineering, GDE Mineral Economics Chief Operating Officer
Alistair joined St Barbara as COO in 2012, and has extensive experience in all aspects of mining operations, including technical, project and general management roles up to Managing Director. Alistair is equally comfortable in open pit and underground operations, with experience in gold, platinum, diamond, manganese, chrome and nickel.
Alistair has held senior roles with Kimberley Diamond Company, Blina Minerals and Consolidated Minerals in Australia, and in South Africa with Anglo Platinum and 17 years with the De Beers Group.
12
Overview as at 30 June 2012:
-
Gwalia Ore Reserves are estimated at 6.9 million tonnes (Mt) @ 8.7 grams per tonne of gold (g/t Au) for 1.93 million ounces (Moz) of contained gold (previously 1.97 Moz); representing an indicative mine life of 9 or more years.
-
Gwalia Deeps Mineral Resources as at 30 June 2012 remained essentially unchanged at 15.3 Mt @ 8.0 g/t Au for 3.9 Moz of contained gold, and Indicated Resources increased from 2.3 Moz to 2.7 Moz. Surface drilling added approximately 240,000 oz to Mineral Resources.
-
The Gwalia ore body remains open at depth, particularly South West Branch lode, with potential within the planned mining interval to add to Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves in both the South Gwalia Series and Main Lodes.
-
Ore Reserves at King of the Hills and Marvel Loch have fallen in line with mining depletion and new mine plans. Mineral Resources have been added at Frasers project at Southern Cross.
COMPANY SUMMARY
-
Total Ore Reserves at 30 June 2012 are estimated at 12.0 million tonnes @ 6.6 g/t Au for 2.5 Moz of contained gold.
-
Total Mineral Resources at 30 June 2012 are estimated at 47.3 million tonnes @ 5.0 g/t Au for 7.6 Moz of contained gold.
Details of Ore Reserves and Mineral Resources as at 30 June 2012 follow.
Mineral Resources Statement as at 30 June 2012
The Company’s total Measured, Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources as at 30 June 2012 are 47.31 million tonnes @ 5.0 grams per tonne of gold (g/t Au) containing 7.61 million ounces (Moz) of gold (Table 1). The previous publicly reported Mineral Resources estimate at 30 June 2011 totalled 46.85 million tonnes @ 5.1 g/t Au containing 7.64 Moz of gold. This represents a small decrease in the total Mineral Resource Inventory of 24,000 oz (<1%).
Compilation of the 2012 Mineral Resource Report is complete with work having been performed on the following projects during the 2012 financial year (FY12):
-
Gwalia Deeps;
-
Gwalia Intermediates;
-
King of the Hills;
-
Marvel Loch;
-
Frasers;
-
Nevoria;
-
Edwards Find.
Each of the projects that has a revised or new estimate of Mineral Resources has been compiled in accordance with St Barbara’s Mineral Resource Estimation System. This system provides a framework for the timely and reliable estimation and reporting of St Barbara’s Mineral Resources in accordance with the JORC Code. St Barbara’s Mineral Resources are inclusive of Ore Reserves.
Mineral Resource Estimate revisions have been completed for Gwalia Deeps, Gwalia Intermediates, King of The Hills, Marvel Loch, Nevoria, Frasers and Edwards Find over the year, and have resulted in additions to Mineral Resources for Gwalia Deeps, Frasers and Edwards Find that have effectively balanced out Mineral Resource reductions due primarily to mining and non-recoverable Mineral Resource depletion (Figure 1). The Frasers Mineral Resource update is a new resource since FY11 following the completion of a three-phase diamond drill program.
Figure 1: Major variances to Mineral Resource Inventory between FY11 and FY12
==> picture [224 x 120] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
8000
7,637 327 355 16 7,613
7500
22 151 240
315
6
7000
6500
6000
FY11Mining DepletionSX Stockpiles SterilisationGwalia Intermediates NevoriaGwalia Deeps FrasersEdwards Find FY12
----- End of picture text -----
Annual Report 2012 13
Ore Reserves and Mineral Resources Statements cont.
LEONORA
• Gwalia Mineral Resources
The following drill programs were completed over the year:
-
Surface drilling of the Gwalia Lode system, targeting extensions to South West Branch (SWB) and South Gwalia Series (SGS) between approximately 1600 and 1800 vertical metres below surface (mbs); and
-
Grade control drilling targeting SWB and SGS between approximately 1260mbs and 1420mbs, and Main Lode (ML) between 1160mbs and 1300mbs.
This drilling resulted in a number of key changes to the Gwalia geological model:
1. Gwalia Deeps
Surface drilling of the Gwalia Lode system, targeting extensions to South West Branch (SWB) and South Gwalia Series (SGS) between approximately 1600 and 1800mbs, and grade control drilling targeting SWB and SGS between approximately 1260mbs and 1420mbs and ML between 1160mbs and 1300mbs was completed over the year. This drilling resulted in a number of key changes to the Gwalia geological model, which are summarised below. The surface drilling is estimated to have added approximately 240,000 oz to the Mineral Resource inventory and upgraded approximately 390,000 oz from Inferred to Indicated Resource, resulting in a total Mineral Resource estimate of 15.25 Mt @ 8.0 g/t Au containing 3.93 Moz Au (refer to Table 1).
2. SWB Hanging-wall position (South)
As a result of Grade Control (GC) drilling, the hanging-wall position of the southern portion of SWB was revised to be further west than previously modelled and resulted in a reduction of the Mineral Resource in this area of 94,000 oz. The initial estimate was based on widely spaced (>100m) drilling on the southern margins of the lode and highlights the importance of infill resource definition drilling well ahead of grade control drilling.
3. Revision of SWB and SGS Model below 1600mbs
The previous Mineral Resource update completed for FY11 resulted in modelling of an additional South Gwalia Series lode (SG3). The further surface drilling completed this year has shown that this lode is actually part of SWB rather than an additional SGS lode. The geological model has been revised accordingly and has resulted in a reduction to the Inferred SGS Mineral Resource, but an overall increase in the SWB Indicated Resource. The surface drilling also identified some small Mineral Resource extensions at the southern margins of SGS, which remain open and will need to be closed out by underground drilling.
4. Main Lode Mineral Resource extensions
Surface and GC drilling have contributed to a revised interpretation of ML, extending this lode further south than previously modelled, and an increase in this Mineral Resource.
5. Gwalia Intermediates
The locations of remnant pillars that form the basis for reporting of the Gwalia Intermediates Mineral Resource were reviewed. A number of remnant pillars particularly toward the base of old workings were identified as being covered by the Gwalia Deeps model, or to have been tested with grade control drilling. These have been removed from the mineral inventory and have resulted in a reduction of this Mineral Resource of 135,000 oz.
Depletion due to mining further reduced the Gwalia Mineral Resource by 184,000 oz.
As a result of the geological model changes, Mineral Resource extensions and mining depletion the Gwalia Mineral Resource Inventory has been reduced by 9,000 oz (-0.3%).
SOUTHERN CROSS
- Marvel Loch Underground
The Marvel Loch Mineral Resource was updated during the year following the completion of fifty five grade control and resource definition holes. Small down dip Mineral Resource extensions were identified for the Firelight, Exhibition and Main Lode Mineral Resources, contributing approximately 52,000 oz. Overall, however the Mineral Resource has been reduced by 173,000 oz primarily due to mining or non-recoverable depletion.
- Nevoria
The Mineral Resource for the Nevoria Project was updated in February following the completion of eleven holes aimed at improving confidence in the Mineral Resource below the Silver and Nevoria East open pits. This model was subsequently optimised and a two stage pit design completed. The 2012 Mineral Resource consists of an open pit Mineral Resource constrained by the design pit at a 0.6 g/t Au cut-off and an underground resource at a 2.0 g/t Au cut-off below the design pit allowing for a 20 metre sill pillar at the base of the design pit.
The drilling resulted in an upgrade in Mineral Resource classification from Inferred to Indicated for a portion of the Nevoria Deposit and overall the total Mineral Resource has increased by 6,000 oz primarily due to the lower cut-off used in reporting the open pit portion of the resource.
- Frasers
The Frasers Mineral Resource estimate was compiled in May 2012 following the completion of three phases of diamond drilling testing the down-plunge and southern strike extensions to the mineralisation. This is the first Mineral Resource estimate for Frasers since mining was suspended in 1997, and added a total of 355,000 ounces to the Company’s Mineral Resources. The Frasers Mineral Resource is open down plunge and at depth and is awaiting a review of mining options.
- Edwards Find
The previous Edwards Find Mineral Resource was estimated in 2008. The model was updated in March 2012 inclusive of drilling completed subsequent to the previous estimate. This has resulted in a small increase in the total Mineral Resource of 16,000 oz.
14
DEPLETION
-
Mining Depletion
-
A total of 327,000 oz of gold have been depleted from the Company’s Operations – 184,000 oz from Gwalia, 60,000 oz from King of the Hills and 83,000 oz from Marvel Loch.
-
Non-Recoverable Depletion
Non-recoverable Mineral Resource depletion has accounted for a reduction of 151,000 oz of gold, primarily from the Marvel Loch Mine (142,000 oz). The depletion has been
defined collaboratively by the Marvel Loch Geology and Technical Services Teams and is due largely to greater sterilisation applied around East Lode & Mazza Lode in the southern portion of the mine.
- Southern Cross Stockpiles A total of 22,000 oz of gold have been depleted from a number of stockpiles in and around the Marvel Loch Mine following the cessation of mining activities.
Table 1: Mineral Resource Summary June 2012
| Category | Measured | Measured | Indicated | Indicated | Inferred | Inferred | Total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tonnes | Au | Tonnes | Au | Tonnes | Au | Tonnes | Au |
||||||
| Region | Project | (k) | g/t | koz | (k) | g/t | koz | (k) | g/t | koz | (k) | g/t | koz |
| Leonora | Gwalia Deeps | 4,684 | 5.6 | 842 | 8,965 | 9.5 | 2,727 | 1,601 | 7.0 | 360 | 15,250 | 8.0 | 3,930 |
| Gwalia Intermediates & West Lode | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 14 | 4.4 | 2 | 557 | 6.4 | 114 | 571 | 6.3 | 116 | |
| King of The Hills | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1,530 | 5.5 | 273 | 480 | 4.8 | 74 | 2,010 | 5.4 | 347 | |
| Tower Hill | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 2,779 | 4.6 | 411 | 207 | 3.9 | 26 | 2,986 | 4.6 | 437 | |
| Harbour Lights | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 2,580 | 3.3 | 274 | 2,580 | 3.3 | 274 | |
| Other(4) | 991 | 1.0 | 33 | 2,277 | 1.0 | 70 | 49 | 0.6 | 1 | 3,317 | 1.0 | 104 | |
| Total Leonora | 5,675 | 4.8 | 875 | 15,565 | 7.0 | 3,483 | 5,474 | 4.8 | 849 | 26,714 | 6.1 | 5,208 | |
| Southern | Marvel Loch | 287 | 3.1 | 29 | 2,929 | 3.2 | 299 | 1,400 | 2.5 | 112 | 4,616 | 3.0 | 440 |
| Cross | Nevoria | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 3,732 | 3.4 | 407 | 328 | 4.0 | 42 | 4,060 | 3.4 | 449 |
| Transvaal | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1,634 | 4.7 | 249 | 1,802 | 4.9 | 286 | 3,436 | 4.8 | 535 | |
| Jaccoletti | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 4.6 | 0.0 | 715 | 5.5 | 126 | 715 | 5.5 | 126 | |
| Axehandle | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 2,082 | 2.0 | 131 | 2,082 | 2.0 | 131 | |
| Cornishman | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 119 | 4.4 | 17 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 119 | 4.4 | 17 | |
| Edwards Find, EFN & Tamarin | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 381 | 3.1 | 38 | 363 | 2.6 | 30 | 744 | 2.8 | 68 | |
| Frasers | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 336 | 5.5 | 59 | 1,786 | 5.2 | 296 | 2,122 | 5.2 | 355 | |
| Yilgarn Star | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 385 | 6.6 | 82 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 385 | 6.6 | 82 | |
| Other(8) | 367 | 1.0 | 12 | 1,605 | 2.7 | 140 | 345 | 4.5 | 50 | 2,317 | 2.7 | 202 | |
| Total Southern Cross | 654 | 1.9 | 41 | 11,121 | 3.6 | 1,291 | 8,821 | 3.8 | 1,073 | 20,596 | 3.6 | 2,405 | |
| Total All Regions | 6,329 | 4.5 | 916 | 26,686 | **5.6 ** | 4,774 | 14,295 | **4.2 ** | 1,922 | 47,310 | **5.0 ** | 7,613 |
(1) Mineral Resources are reported inclusive of Ore Reserves.
(2) Cut-off Grades Leonora: Gwalia Deeps (2.5 g/t Au), King of The Hills (3.0 g/t Au), Tower Hill (3.2 g/t Au), Harbour Lights (2.0 g/t Au).
(3) Gwalia Intermediates & West Lode: For this combined Mineral Resource the Gwalia Intermediates Mineral Resource is constrained to remnant pillars and accounts for 93% of Mineral Resource ounces. West Lode cut-off = 1.0 g/t Au.
(4) Leonora Other is comprised of McGraths (23%), Rainbow (36%), Royal Arthur Bore (12%), Tarmoola Low Grade Stockpile (28%), Tower Hill Low Grade Stockpile (1%) by Mineral Resource ounces.
(5) Cut-off Grades Southern Cross: Marvel Loch (2.1 g/t Au), Jaccoletti (2.6 g/t Au), Axehandle ( 0.7 g/t Au), Cornishman (0.8 g/t Au), Edwards Find Group (0.7 g/t Au & 0.8 g/t Au), Frasers (2.5 g/t Au), Yilgarn Star (4.0 g/t Au).
(6) Southern Cross (Nevoria): Cut-off Grade for open pit and underground Mineral Resources are 0.6 g/t and 2.0 g/t respectively. 58% of Nevoria Mineral Resource ounces are open pit and 42% are underground.
(7) Southern Cross (Transvaal): Cut-off grades for open pit Mineral Resources are variable (1.0 g/t Au to 1.7 g/t Au) dependent on lode and material type. Underground Mineral Resources are reported at a 2.6 g/t Au cut-off and account for 98% of the Transvaal Mineral Resource ounces.
(8) Southern Cross Other is comprised of GVG Sulphide (49%), GVG Open Pit (6%), New Zealand Gully (12%), Ruapehu (27%), Stockpiles (6%) by Mineral Resource ounces.
(9) Data is rounded to thousands of tonnes and thousands of ounces. Discrepancies in totals may occur due to rounding.
Annual Report 2012 15
Ore Reserves and Mineral Resources Statements cont.
Competent Persons Statement:
The information in this report that relates to Mineral Resources is based on information compiled by Mr. Phillip Uttley, who is a Fellow of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Phillip Uttley is a full-time employee of St Barbara Ltd and has sufficient experience relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2004 Edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves” (JORC Code).
Mr. Uttley consents to the inclusion in the statement of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.
ORE RESERVES STATEMENT AS AT 30 JUNE 2012
The Company’s Total Ore Reserves estimates as at 30 June 2012 totalled 11.97 million tonnes at 6.6 grams per tonne of gold (g/t Au), containing 2.53 million ounces (Moz) (2011 Reserve: 14.68 million tonnes @ 5.8 g/t Au containing 2.76 Moz). Ore Reserves are located at Gwalia, King of the Hills, Tower Hill and the Southern Cross Region. These Ore Reserves are tabulated in Table 2.
The 2012 Ore Reserve estimates are based on the following assumptions:
-
A gold price of A$1,250 per ounce has been used for Gwalia, King of the Hills and Tower Hill. An average of A$1,400 has been used for Marvel Loch Underground. Residual surface stockpiles at Southern Cross have been estimated at a historical price of A$1,075 per ounce.
-
Gwalia and King of the Hills have had updated Life of Mine plans which have been used in this estimate.
-
Tower Hill has been carried over from the 2011 estimate.
-
Marvel Loch’s estimate is based on the remaining Life of Mine with current Ore Reserves to be depleted before end of 2012 calendar year.
-
Nevoria has been subject to further studies and its Ore Reserve status has been confirmed.
The net depletion for the 2012 financial year of 229 koz, in the context of gold production for the fiscal year of 339 koz, is attributable to:
-
353 koz from mining activities (184 koz at Gwalia, 60 koz at King of the Hills and 83 koz at Southern Cross, with an additional 26 koz from stockpiles).
-
152 koz of additions at Gwalia and King of the Hills as an outcome of additional Ore Resource and remodelling.
-
20 koz depletion at King of the Hills due to redesign of pillars associated with the open pit exclusion zone.
-
30 koz additional depletion at Southern Cross in response to changed mining plans.
GWALIA
The overall Gwalia Ore Reserve estimate as at 30 June 2012 has reduced by a net 48 koz, after 184 koz of gold production. The Ore Reserve grade has reduced slightly to 8.7 g/t Au (2011: 8.9 g/t Au). Increased confidence in reconciliation and modelling work has been used to update extraction and grade factor, which have been applied to the 2012 Mineral Resource model to estimate Ore Reserves. The Ore Reserve estimate comprises a depleted Grade Control model to 1,420 metres below surface (mbs), with the 2012 model from 1,420 to 1,800mbs (2011: 1,780mbs). As at 30 June 2012, based on Ore Reserves and the Life of Mine plan, the Gwalia mine is expected to have a 9+ year mine life.
KING OF THE HILLS
The Definitive Mining Study for the King of the Hills mine has been reviewed and updated in response to infill drilling in both the Eastern and Western Flank Ore bodies. This revised mine plan includes a 20 koz depletion for pillars associated with the exclusion zone beneath the historical open pit as well as an additional 16 koz arising from infill drilling conducted during the period under review.
TABLE 2: SUMMARY OF PROVED AND PROBABLE ORE RESERVES AS AT 30 JUNE 2012
| Category | Proved | Probable | Probable | Total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Region | Project | Tonnes (k) | Au g/t | koz | Tonnes (k) | Au g/t | koz | Tonnes (k) | Au g/t | koz |
| Leonora | Gwalia Deeps | 1,279 | 8.5 | 348 | 5,601 | 8.8 | 1,577 | 6,880 | 8.7 | 1,925 |
| Tower Hill* | 2,699 | 3.8 | 329 | 2,699 | 3.8 | 329 | ||||
| King of the Hills | 955 | 5.0 | 153 | 955 | 5.0 | 153 | ||||
| Total Leonora | 1,279 | 8.5 | 348 | 9,255 | 6.9 | 2,060 | 10,534 | 7.1 | 2,407 | |
| Southern Cross | Marvel Loch | 6 | 4.9 | 1 | 349 | 2.4 | 26 | 355 | 2.4 | 27 |
| Nevoria Underground* | 713 | 4.0 | 80 | 713 | 3.5 | 80 | ||||
| Other (SXO Stock Piles) | 367 | 1.0 | 12 | 367 | 1.0 | 12 | ||||
| Total Southern Cross | 373 | 1.1 | 13 | 1,062 | 3.1 | 107 | 1,435 | 2.6 | 120 | |
| Total All Regions | 1,652 | 6.8 | 361 | 10,317 | 6.5 | 2,166 | 11,969 | 6.6 | 2,527 |
Notes:
- (1) Ore Reserves are based on a gold price of A$1,250/oz for Gwalia, King of the Hills, Tower Hill and Nevoria; A$1,400 average for Marvel Loch Underground.
(2) Mineral Resources are reported as inclusive of Ore Reserves.
(3) All data is rounded to two significant figures. Discrepancies in summations will occur due to rounding.
(4) Other relates to surface stockpiles valued at A$1,075/oz.
(5) * Items in Italics are carried forward from June 2011 Ore Reserve.
16
Competent Persons Statement:
The information in this report that relates to Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Mr. John de Vries, who is a Member of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr. de Vries is a full-time employee of St Barbara Ltd and has sufficient experience relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2004 Edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves” (JORC Code). Mr. de Vries consents to the inclusion in the statement of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.
TABLE 3: ORE RESERVE CHANGES FROM 2011 TO 2012
| 2011 koz Depletion koz Addition koz |
2012 koz Variance koz Comment |
|---|---|
| LEONORA Gwalia Deeps 1,973 -184 136 -184 136 Tower Hill 329 0 0 King of the Hills 221 -80 12 -60 -20 12 |
1,925 -48 Mining Depletion was partially offset by ounces added to the Reserve during the year. -184 Mining depletion. 136 Re modelling Gwalia deeps from additional drilling 1420–1800mbs. 329 0 No Change carried forward 153 -68 Mining depletion and revised mine design. -60 Mining depletion. -20 Revised mining plan resulting in sterilisation of Eastern Flank Crown Pit Pillar by mining activities completed. 12 Additions from design revision based on new drilling. |
| Total Leonora 2,523 -264 148 |
2,407 -116 |
| SOUTHERN CROSS Marvel Loch 119 -93 0 -83 -10 Nevoria Underground 80 0 0 Other 34 -26 4 |
27 -93 Mining depletion and depletion of reserve beyond Mine life. -83 Mining depletion. -10 Uneconomic depletion of reserve beyond Mine life. 80 0 No Change carried forward. 12 -22 Marvel Loch Open Pit surface stockpile. |
| Total Southern Cross 233 -119 4 |
120 -115 |
| Total All Regions 2,756 -383 152 |
2,526 -231 |
Annual Report 2012 17
The Board and Management of St Barbara are committed to maintaining high standards of ethics, integrity and statutory compliance in all Company dealings.
This report describes the Corporate Governance framework in place that underpins the delivery of these objectives, and the Company’s conformance with the ASX Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations (2nd Edition) (“the ASX Principles and Recommendations”), by reference to each of the stated principles.
In addition, important governance information including details on the composition of the Board and Executive Management, Board related charters, and significant Company policies are available on the Company’s website at www.stbarbara.com.au.
Principle 1: Lay solid foundations for management and oversight
The role of the Board is to protect and enhance shareholder value, approve the Company’s strategic direction, provide Management with guidance and oversight and foster a culture of good governance.
In performing its role, the Board at all times endeavours to act:
-
a. in a manner designed to achieve business success and create and continue to build long term value for shareholders;
-
b. recognising its overriding responsibility to act honestly, fairly and ethically in serving the interests of the Company, its shareholders, employees, and as appropriate, other stakeholders; and
-
c. in accordance with the duties and obligations imposed upon Directors by the Board Charter and the Company’s Constitution and applicable law.
The responsibilities of the Board are described in the Board Charter. Management is responsible for the day to day operation of the Company which it undertakes within a framework of specific delegated authority and approval limits.
The performance of each senior executive is formally assessed each year under the Company’s performance appraisal system and reviewed by the Board. Further details, including the linkage to remuneration, are contained in the Remuneration Report.
Principle 2: Structure the Board to add value
INDEPENDENCE
It is Board policy that a majority of Non Executive Directors, including the Chairman, should be independent and free of any relationship that may conflict with the interests of the Company.
Each Director is required to provide advance notice of any actual or potential conflict of interest relating to business planned to be considered by the Board. Directors who have declared a potential or real conflict of interest on a particular issue may be excluded from all relevant Board deliberations, and from voting on that issue.
In assessing the independence of Directors, the Board considers the materiality of any transactions during the year relative to both the Company and any third party with which a Director is associated. Whilst Mr Lockyer has advised the Company that he is also a Non-Executive Director of Swick Mining Services, a provider of drilling services to the Company, Mr Lockyer abstains from any Board discussions relating to Swick Mining Services and is considered by the Board to be independent.
COMPOSITION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The Board periodically reviews its own composition, skill set and capability. The Board considers that the size, nature, scope and location of the Company’s operations requires a mix of skills broadly technical, financial and commercial in nature and with a focus on natural resources. Specifically those skills should include governance, capital management and capital markets, mining and exploration, health, safety and environment, remuneration and policy and strategic planning. In seeking to ensure that the Board composition reflects and meets those needs, a broad diversity among directors is also sought based on age, gender and professional background qualifications and experience.
Having regard to the importance and relative infrequency of Board changes, there is no Nomination Committee as such but rather, the Board retains the nomination responsibility for itself.
When a need to appoint a Director to the Board arises, the Board reviews its skill sets and needs, and engages an independent search firm to assist and advise the Board in identifying and selecting the best candidate for the given vacancy. The assessment process includes interviews by at least a majority of, if not all, Board members.
The Board assesses candidates against a range of specific criteria, including their experience, background, qualifications and professional skills, potential conflicts of interest, the requirement for independence and the existing collective skill sets of the Board.
BOARD PERFORMANCE REVIEW
The Board undertook a formal review of its own performance during the 2011–12 financial year. This followed similar reviews in the preceding two years. The review was co-ordinated by the Chairman based on a formal questionnaire to all directors and senior executives and one on one interviews addressing board, committee and individual director performance. The outcomes were formally considered by directors who concluded that the Board and its committees are functioning well and that there were no Board performance issues which required any remedial action.
BOARD STRUCTURE
The Board currently comprises Colin Wise (Chairman), Doug Bailey, Betsy Donaghey, Tim Lehany (Managing Director & CEO), Phil Lockyer and Robert Rae.
Details of each current Director’s skills, qualifications, experience, relevant expertise and date of appointment are set out in the Directors’ Report.
The Board has established a number of standing Board Committees to provide a forum for a more detailed analysis of key issues and interaction with Management. Each Committee reports its recommendations to the next Board meeting. The current Committees are:
-
Remuneration Committee;
-
Audit Committee; and
-
Health and Safety Committee.
The charter for each committee is available on the Company website at www.stbarbara.com.au.
In addition, a special purpose Board Committee may be established for a particular set of circumstances, as appropriate.
All current Non Executive Directors, including the Chairman, are considered to be independent. The Managing Director and CEO is the only Executive Director on the Board.
18
REMUNERATION COMMITTEE
The role of the Remuneration Committee is to assist and advise the Board on matters relating to:
-
a. The overall remuneration strategies and policies of the Company; and
-
b. The remuneration of the Managing Director & CEO, his senior executive direct reports, employees of the Company, and Non Executive Directors.
The members of the Remuneration Committee at the date of this report are Robert Rae (Chair), Doug Bailey, Betsy Donaghey and Colin Wise.
AUDIT COMMITTEE
The role of the Audit Committee is to assist and advise the Board on matters relating to:
-
a. Financial reporting;
-
b. Financial risk management;
-
c. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the financial control environment;
-
d. Review of the internal and external audit functions; and
-
e. Review of the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation processes.
The members of the Audit Committee at the date of this report are Doug Bailey (Chair), Phil Lockyer, Robert Rae and Colin Wise.
HEALTH AND SAFETY COMMITTEE
The role of the Health and Safety Committee is to assist and advise the Board on matters relating to:
-
a. Promoting a safety conscious culture throughout the Company;
-
b. Reviewing Health and Safety policies;
-
c. Reviewing Health and Safety objectives, strategies and plans; and
-
d. Monitoring compliance with Health and Safety regulatory requirements.
The members of the Health and Safety Committee at the date of this report are Phil Lockyer (Chair), Betsy Donaghey and Colin Wise.
ATTENDANCE AT MEETINGS AND ENGAGEMENT WITH THE BUSINESS
Details of the number of meetings of the Board and each standing Committee during the year, and each Director’s attendance at those meetings, are set out in the Directors Report. Every Director has a standing invitation to attend any committee meeting and to receive committee papers.
All Directors visit St Barbara’s mining operations periodically and meet with Management regularly to gain a better understanding of the Company’s business.
INDEPENDENT PROFESSIONAL ADVICE AND ACCESS TO COMPANY INFORMATION.
As specified in the Board Charter and individual letters of appointment, Directors have the right of access to all Company information and to the Company’s Management. Subject to prior consultation with the Chairman, Directors may seek independent advice on any issue of particular concern from a suitably qualified adviser, at the Company’s expense.
Principle 3: Promote ethical and responsible decision making
The Company has implemented a formal set of behavioural values designed to uphold high standards of integrity and work performance for the Board, Management, employees, and other members of the work force. The Company vision and the values underpinning it are disclosed on the Company’s website.
Employees are accountable for their conduct under a range of Company policies and procedures, including safety, environment, equal opportunity, continuous disclosure and trading in Company securities. Employees and contractors are also made aware of acceptable behaviour through induction programs, on-going training and development and contact with senior staff who are encouraged to lead by example.
Procedures are in place to record and publicly report each Director’s shareholdings in the Company.
The Company Secretary is responsible for investigating any reports of unethical practices and reporting the outcomes to the Managing Director & CEO or the Board, as appropriate.
The Company has not enshrined its values into a formal code of ethics at this time as it considers that all matters describing, prescribing and underpinning ethical behaviour are contained in the values and key policies outlined above.
DIVERSITY
The Company implemented a Diversity Policy during the 2011 financial year which is available on the Company’s website at www.stbarbara.com.au. The Policy was reviewed by the Board during the year to ensure it remains appropriate and is operating effectively.
The measurable gender diversity objectives endorsed by the Board for the year, and the progress made against those objectives during the year, are as follows:
-
Increase the proportion of women employed by St Barbara from 17% to 19%, by 31 July 2014. During the year the number of women employed at St Barbara increased from 44 to 54. This resulted in the proportion of women increasing to 19.6 percent by 30 June 2012.
-
Reduce the Overall Pay Equity Gap at St Barbara to 20%, by 31 July 2014. During the year the median pay for women increased and the Overall Pay Equity Gap reduced to 17.7 percent.
-
Increase the percentage of women who return to work after a period of Maternity Leave to at least 66.6%, by 31 July 2014. Positive progress has been made with the only woman taking a period of Parental Leave over the review period, returning to work after nine months of Parental Leave. Furthermore, the three women who are currently taking a period of Parental Leave in 2012 have all expressed a desire to return to work, therefore it is highly likely the target of 66.67% will be achieved or exceeded.
-
By 30 June 2012, develop and implement a Talent Taskforce for the purposes of attracting and retaining a talented and diverse workforce.
A Talent Taskforce was established during the year to support executives in:
-
understanding the talent-related issues the Company is facing and is likely to face in the future;
-
identifying and ranking options to best position St Barbara for accessing the necessary talent to deliver our business strategy;
Annual Report 2012 19
Corporate Governance cont.
The following table shows the number of men and women on the Board, in Executive roles and in the workforce:
St Barbara Limited Gender Statistics Financial Year 12
| Total | No. of Men | % Men | No. of Women | % Women | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Board | 5 | 4 | 80% | 1 | 20% |
| Senior Executives | 5 | 5 | 100% | 0 | 0% |
| Whole Organisation | 275 | 221 | 80% | 54 | 20% |
Notes:
(1) Gender Statistics are as at 30 June 2012.
(2) The Board excludes the role of Managing Director & CEO.
(3) Senior Executives includes the role of Managing Director & CEO and the four most senior executives.
(4) Whole Organisation includes the Managing Director & CEO but does not include other Board members.
Principle 4: Safeguard integrity in financial reporting
The function of the Audit Committee includes responsibility on behalf of the Board for reviewing the integrity of financial reporting. The Audit Committee reviews the principles governing the Company’s relationship with its external auditor. The Board considers that the external auditor’s process of partner rotation is sufficient to maintain independence of the external audit function.
The Company has also initiated an internal audit function to review, independently of the external auditor, key financial controls and systems. That function is managed by an independent accounting firm which reports directly to the Audit Committee.
Principle 5: Make timely and balanced disclosure
St Barbara seeks to provide relevant up-to-date information to its shareholders and the broader investment community in accordance with the continuous disclosure requirements of the ASX Listing Rules and Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).
The Company has implemented, and periodically updates, a Continuous Disclosure and External Communication Policy to ensure that information considered material to the share price is lodged with the ASX as soon as practicable and within ASX Listing Rule timelines.
Other relevant information, including Company presentations, are also subject to a structured process of internal review, disclosed to the ASX and posted on the Company’s website.
Principle 7: Recognise and manage risk
Risk assessment and management are central to how the Company conducts its business through an enterprise wide risk management framework which delivers enhanced risk reporting and control mechanisms designed to ensure that strategic, operational, legal, reputational, financial and other risks are identified, assessed and managed.
The financial reporting and control mechanisms are reviewed during the year by Management, the Audit Committee, the internal audit function and the external auditor. The Board receives an annual declaration from the Managing Director and the Chief Financial Officer in accordance with section 295A of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) that the Company’s financial statements are founded on a sound system of risk management and internal control and that the system is operating effectively in all material respects in relation to financial reporting risks.
The Company has policies to manage risk in the areas of Health and Safety, Environment and Equal Employment Opportunity. The Board regularly reviews the high level risks within the business and the effectiveness of the Company’s management of those risks.
Principle 8: Remunerate fairly and responsibly
The Remuneration Committee provides recommendations to the Board on the remuneration of the Managing Director & CEO, other senior executives and Non-Executive Directors. The Committee also reviews and approves all remuneration consultancy contracts for key management personnel remuneration and receives any remuneration recommendations.
NON-EXECUTIVE REMUNERATION
Principle 6: Respect the rights of shareholders
The Company has a practice of regular engagement with shareholders in Australia and overseas and conducts regular analyst briefings. These activities are supported by the publication of the Annual Report, Quarterly Reports, public announcements and the posting of ASX releases on the Company website immediately after their disclosure on the ASX. Shareholders can elect to receive email notification of announcements.
Shareholders are encouraged to attend the Annual General Meeting and any other meetings of shareholders, to use the opportunity to ask questions and personally vote on shareholder resolutions. The external auditor attends the Annual General Meeting and is available to answer questions in relation to the audit of the financial statements.
The remuneration of the Non Executive Directors is in the form of fixed fees consistent with their independence and impartiality. There are no retirement benefits paid to Non Executive Directors. Independent expert remuneration advice is considered from time to time in determining remuneration for the Chairman and Non-Executive Directors, respectively.
EXECUTIVE REMUNERATION
The Remuneration Committee provides recommendations to the Board on all aspects of executive remuneration including fixed remuneration, short term incentives and long term incentives. It utilises independent expert advice and surveys as appropriate to benchmark remuneration against contemporary resources industry data.
Further details of Director and Executive Management remuneration for the 2012 financial year are set out in the Directors’ Report.
20
Annual Report 2012 21
The Directors present their report on the Group “St Barbara Group”, consisting of St Barbara Limited and the entities it controlled at the end of, or during, the financial year ended 30 June 2012.
Directors
The following persons were Directors of St Barbara Limited at any time during the year and up to the date of this report:
-
S J C Wise Chairman
-
T J Lehany Managing Director & CEO
-
D W Bailey Non-executive director
-
E A Donaghey Non-executive director
-
P C Lockyer Non-executive director
-
R K Rae Non-executive director
The qualifications, experience and special responsibilities of the Directors are presented on pages 27 to 28.
Principal activities
During the year the principal activities of the Group were mining and the sale of gold, mineral exploration and development. There were no significant changes in the nature of activities of the Group during the year.
Dividends
There were no dividends paid or declared during the financial year.
Overview of Results
St Barbara completed the 2012 financial year in a strong financial position, reporting a Statutory Profit of $130,230,000 (2011: $68,629,000) for the year ended 30 June 2012, which included significant items amounting to a net loss of $552,000 (2011: net gain of $14,198,000), cash on hand at 30 June 2012 of $185,242,000 (2011: $79,485,000) and total interest bearing borrowings of $4,256,000 (2011: $12,072,000).
The underlying net profit after tax for the year was $130,782,000 (2011: $54,431,000). The consolidated result for the year is summarised as follows:
| is summarised as follows: | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30 June 12 | 30 June 11 | |
| $’000 | $’000 | |
| Sales revenue | 541,189 | 359,575 |
| EBITDA(3)(including significant items) | 204,034 | 125,538 |
| EBIT(2)(including significant items) | 106,811 | 67,058 |
| Statutory Profit(1)after tax for the year | 130,230 | 68,629 |
| Total net significant items | (552) | 14,198 |
| EBITDA(3)– excluding significant items | 218,963 | 111,340 |
| EBIT(2)– excluding significant items | 128,094 | 52,860 |
| Underlying net profit after tax(4)for the year | 130,782 | 54,431 |
(1) Statutory Profit is net profit after tax attributable to owners of the parent.
(2) EBIT is earnings before interest revenue, finance costs and income tax expense.
(3) EBITDA is EBIT before depreciation and amortisation.
(4) Underlying net profit after tax is net profit after income tax (“Statutory Profit”) excluding significant items.
(5) EBIT, EBITDA and underlying net profit after tax are non-IFRS financial measures, which have not been subject to review or audit by the Group’s external auditors. These measures are presented to enable understanding of the underlying performance of the Group.
The significant items in the year ended 30 June 2012 comprised a net realised/unrealised loss on gold put and call options of $5,400,000, expenses associated with the Allied Gold acquisition of $5,664,000, an impairment write off of Southern Cross assets of $10,219,000, and an income tax benefit of $20,731,000.
22
Details of significant items included in the Statutory Profit for the year are as follows:
| 30 June 12 | 30 June 11 | |
|---|---|---|
| $’000 | $’000 | |
| Unrealised (loss)/gain on gold options(1) | (6,102) | 12,946 |
| Realised gain on gold options(1) | 702 | 525 |
| Expenses associated with acquisitions(2) | (5,664) | – |
| Asset impairment write-down(3) | (10,219) | – |
| Profit on sale of Tarmoola processing plant | – | 1,164 |
| Proceeds from sale of tenement rights | – | 1,963 |
| Native Title accrual | – | (2,400) |
| Significant items before tax | (21,283) | 14,198 |
| Income tax benefit(4) | 20,731 | – |
| Total significant items – net (loss)/profit after tax | (552) | 14,198 |
(1) At 30 June 2012 the mark-to-market value of the Company’s gold put and call options (collar structure) was negative $16,290,000 (June 2011: negative $8,101,000). The put and call options at 30 June 2012 represent price protection for 175,000 ounces of King of the Hills production, and 20,000 ounces for Southern Cross production (June 2011: King of the Hills: 238,000 ounces; Southern Cross: nil ounces). In accordance with accounting standards the net unrealised loss, representing the movement in the time value of the gold options during the year, amounting to $6,102,000, was recognised in the income statement (2011: unrealised gain of $12,946,000). The net realised gain of $702,000 represents the unwinding of the unrealised mark-to-market loss previously recognised for gold options that were exercised or expired during the year (2011: realised gain of $525,000). The unrealised loss related to the movement in the intrinsic value of the gold options in the year of $3,054,000 (2011: gain of $17,102,000) was recognised in the gold cash flow hedge reserve in equity, with a realised gain of $264,000 recognised in the reserve for options that were exercised or expired during the year. Over time, unrealised losses on the gold options recognised in the income statement will reverse either through a change in the mark-to-market value of the options or maturity of the contracts.
-
(2) During the year, the Company engaged various consultants to assist with completing the due diligence and in making an offer for Allied Gold (refer Note 33 of the Financial Statements for further details of the Allied Gold transaction).
-
(3) Based on an assessment of the Southern Cross operations cash generating unit (“CGU”) at 30 June 2012, an impairment write down was taken against assets of the CGU. While the Southern Cross operations are expected to generate positive net cash flows in the remaining period to closure, the cash flow estimates no longer support the full recovery of the carrying value of the Southern Cross CGU assets, including deferred mine operating development expenditure ($3,865,000), capitalised mine development ($1,723,000), plant and equipment ($3,901,000) and capitalised exploration and evaluation expenditure ($730,000).
-
(4) At 30 June 2011, the Group had unbooked tax losses of $182,258,000 (before tax effect) – these losses were not booked as it was not probable at that time that future taxable profits would be generated to utilise these losses. At 30 June 2012, based on current operational forecasts, it is now probable that future taxable profits will be generated to utilise the Group’s tax losses. The credit of $20,731,000 recognised as an income tax benefit represents the booking of the tax effect of remaining losses at 30 June 2012 which were not previously booked.
Discussion and Analysis of Operating Results and the Income Statement
For the year ended 30 June 2012 St Barbara reported an underlying profit after income tax of $130,782,000 (2011: $54,431,000), representing a substantial improvement on the previous year. The significant improvement compared with the prior year was the result of increased gold sales from Gwalia and King of the Hills, with 2012 being the first full year of operations at King of the Hills, and a stronger gold price.
The Group’s focus during the year continued to be increasing production at the Gwalia and King of the Hills underground mines at Leonora, achievement of profitable production at the Southern Cross operations and exploration for gold close to existing operations at Leonora and Southern Cross.
Annual Report 2012 23
Directors’ Report cont.
Financial performance
Total sales revenue of $541,189,000 (2011: $359,575,000) was generated from gold sales of 335,787 ounces (2011: 257,653 ounces) at an average achieved gold price of A$1,603 per ounce (2011: A$1,387 per ounce). Total production for the period was 338,879 ounces (2011: 258,474 ounces), with Leonora operations contributing 241,487 ounces (2011: 138,199 ounces) and Southern Cross operations 97,392 ounces (2011: 120,275 ounces). A summary of the production performance for the year ended 30 June 2012 is provided in the table below.
DETAILS OF 2012 PRODUCTION PERFORMANCE
| Southern Cross | Gwalia | King of the Hills |
|---|---|---|
| 2011/12 2010/11 |
2011/12 2010/11 |
2011/12 2010/11 |
| Underground Ore Mined t 892,365 1,161,078 Grade g/t 2.9 3.2 Ore Milled t 1,842,820 1,199,627 Grade g/t 1.9 3.4 Recovery % 89 92 Gold Production oz 97,392 120,275 Cash Cost(1) A$/oz 1,199 890 Total Cost(1) A$/oz 1,482 1,060 |
662,300 647,546 8.8 6.3 716,640 648,212 8.3 6.3 97 96 184,534 131,133 646 765 882 1,020 |
457,375 65,819 4.1 4.5 452,941 50,105 4.1 4.6 94 95 56,953 7,066 753 699 1,051 997 |
(1) Before significant items
GWALIA
Gold production from the Gwalia underground mine in the year was 187,023 ounces (2011: 131,133 ounces), which was a significant increase on the prior year. As the mine reached its long term sustainable production rate, the higher production was due mainly to an increase in the average grade of ore mined as ore sources moved into the higher grade South West Branch. The South West Branch is expected to be the principal ore source for the foreseeable future. The Leonora processing plant continued to perform well during the year and achieved average recoveries of 97%. A small quantity of low grade ore from Tower Hill stockpiles and Gwalia mineralised waste were treated during the year to capitalise on plant capacity. Gwalia unit cash costs for the year were $646 per ounce (2011: $765 per ounce), reflecting the benefit of higher production. Total Cash Operating Costs at Gwalia[(1)] of $119,158,000 were higher compared with the prior year (2011: $100,373,000), due mainly to increased mining activity and higher production.
KING OF THE HILLS
After commencing production in April 2011, the King of the Hills mine produced 60,235 contained ounces in the year ended 30 June 2012. During the year, 452,941 tonnes of King of the Hills ore was processed through the Gwalia processing plant producing 56,953 ounces. The King of the Hills unit cash costs for the year were $753 per ounce, which was in line with expectations. Total Cash Operating Costs at King of the Hills were $42,870,000 (2011: $4,941,000), reflecting the fact that the 2012 financial year was the first full year of production.
SOUTHERN CROSS
Southern Cross operations generated positive cash flows as the Marvel Loch mine approaches the end of its mine life. For the year ended 30 June 2012, Southern Cross operations generated positive net cash flows of $22,852,000. The Marvel Loch underground mine produced 82,346 ounces (2011: 120,275 ounces) in the year. The lower production compared with the prior year was due to lower tonnes mined from Marvel Loch at a lower grade. To offset the lower production from Marvel Loch underground the operations processed 944,237 tonnes of existing low grade stockpiles from satellite mine sites, which reduced the overall milled grade to 1.9 grams per tonne for the year (2011: 3.4 grams per tonne). The Southern Cross Operations unit cash costs for the year were $1,199 per ounce before significant items (2011: $890 per ounce), reflecting the impact of the lower production and grade. Total Cash Operating Costs were $116,819,000 (2011: $107,081,000) for the year, with the higher costs compared with prior year attributable to the increase in ore milled.
As at 30 June 2012 an impairment write off of $10,219,000 (before income tax) was taken against the assets of the Southern Cross operations cash generating unit (“CGU”). The remaining life of the Marvel Loch underground mine is expected to end in October 2012 and the processing plant will be placed on care and maintenance in November 2012. While the operations are expected to generate positive net cash flows in the remaining period to closure, the cash flow estimates no longer support the full recovery of the carrying value of the assets.
CORPORATE AND DISCOVERY & GROWTH
(1) Cash Operating Costs are mine operating costs including government royalties, and after by-product credits. This non-IFRS financial information is presented to provide meaningful information to assist management, investors and analysts in understanding the results of the operations. Cash Operating Costs are calculated according to common mining industry practice using The Gold Institute (USA) Production Cost Standard (1999 revision).
Exploration and evaluation expenditure in the year amounted to $20,821,000 (2011: $22,147,000), of which $16,246,000 (2011: $13,284,000) was expensed in the income statement. Capitalised exploration in the year was in relation to the deep drilling program at the Gwalia mine.
24
During the year, the Company incurred $5,664,000 in costs associated with the Allied Gold acquisition. The majority of the expenditure in the year relates to legal, financial and technical consultants engaged to assist with due diligence.
Corporate administration costs for the year of $13,732,000 (2011: $13,819,000) comprised mainly expenses relating to the corporate office and compliance costs.
Royalty expenses for the year were $22,078,000 (2011: $13,693,000), reflecting the impact of higher gold sales revenue from increased production and a higher average achieved gold price. This expense represents gold royalties paid to the Western Australian Government and a third party corporate royalty, which equated to a charge of $66 per ounce sold.
Other revenue of $6,779,000 (2011: $9,382,000) comprised mainly interest earned during the year of $6,442,000 (2011: $5,611,000). The prior year included third party toll treatment revenue of $3,422,000.
Other income for the year of $922,000 (2011: $4,449,000) included $550,000 representing the recovery of legal costs in relation to the Eshuys litigation. Other income in the prior year included the sale of the Tarmoola plant; the sale of excess tenements in the Leonora region; and the recovery of legal costs in relation to the Kingstream litigation.
Depreciation and amortisation of fixed assets and capitalised mine development and exploration amounted to $97,223,000 (2011: $58,480,000) for the year. Depreciation and amortisation attributable to Gwalia was $45,200,000 (2011: $35,092,000), King of the Hills was $17,168,000 (2011: $2,107,000), and Southern Cross was $33,824,000 (2011: $20,443,000), with the balance associated with corporate and exploration activities. The higher depreciation and amortisation charge in the year at Gwalia and King of the Hills was attributable to the higher production compared with the prior year. Included within the Southern Cross depreciation and amortisation expense was an impairment write off of $6,354,000. The remaining increase in the Southern Cross depreciation and amortisation expense reflected the increase in mine development amortisation as the mine nears the end of its life.
Net finance costs in the year were $3,754,000 (2011: $4,040,000), representing the unwinding of the discount on the rehabilitation provision of $2,890,000, and interest expenses on finance leases and the bank guarantee facility for environmental bonds.
A net realised/unrealised loss of $5,400,000 (2011: gain of $13,471,000) was recognised in the income statement for the year, representing the movement in the mark-to-market valuation of the Company’s gold put and call options (collar structure). The collar structure is a cash flow hedge, which as at 30 June 2012 provides price protection for 175,000 ounces of King of the Hills production to June 2015 and 20,000 ounces of Southern Cross production to September 2012. Accounting standards require movements in the time value of the collar structure to be recognised in the income statement at each reporting date.
Discussion and Analysis of the Cash Flow Statement
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Cash flows from operating activities for the year were $221,827,000 (2011: $103,073,000), representing a significant increase compared to the prior year. Increased operating cash flows were attributable to higher receipts from customers, reflecting the benefit of higher gold sales. Payments to suppliers and employees were higher than the prior year at $320,465,000 (2011: $241,716,000) due mainly to increased production at Gwalia and a full year of production at King of the Hills. Payments for exploration expensed in the year amounted to $16,246,000 (2011: $13,284,000), with the higher amount expensed attributable to a lower level of capitalised expenditure compared with the prior year. Interest received of $5,555,000 (2011: $5,122,000) was higher than in the prior year due to the increased level of cash on hand during the year. Interest paid in the year was $65,000 (2011: $37,000).
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Net cash flows used in investing activities amounted to $104,971,000 (2011: $122,382,000) for the year. Lower expenditure in the year was attributable to the reduction in development expenditure at Gwalia and Southern Cross, and the fact that the King of the Hills mine was developed and commissioned in the prior year. Exploration and evaluation expenditure capitalised of $4,575,000 (2011: $8,863,000) largely represented drilling to extend resources at the Gwalia mine. Investing expenditure during the year was in the following major areas:
-
Underground mine development and infrastructure at Gwalia: $44,059,000 (2011: $49,302,000);
-
Underground mine development and infrastructure at Marvel Loch: $13,987,000 (2011: $23,383,000);
-
Underground mine development and infrastructure at King of the Hills: $22,711,000 (2011: $33,598,000);
-
Purchase of property, plant and equipment at the operations: $19,457,000 (2011: $12,207,000); and
-
Exploration and evaluation capitalised: $4,575,000 (2011: $8,863,000).
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net cash flows from financing activities were an outflow of $11,099,000 (2011: outflow of $3,363,000), with major movements in cash flows including:
-
Payments for share buy-backs in February and March 2012 of $2,239,000 (2011: Nil);
-
Scheduled repayments of insurance premiums, leasing and equipment financing facilities amounting to $4,452,000 (2011: $7,005,000);
-
Repayment of the outstanding balance of an asset financing facility of $6,963,000 (2011: Nil); and
-
Proceeds for funding asset purchases and insurance premiums totalling $3,227,000 (2011: $4,299,000).
Annual Report 2012 25
Directors’ Report cont.
Discussion and Analysis of the Statement of Financial Position
gold cash flow hedge reserve. At 30 June 2012, the Company booked a net deferred tax asset of $22,215,000 relating to tax losses which had previously not been recognised.
NET ASSETS AND TOTAL EQUITY
St Barbara’s net assets and total equity increased during the year by $127,486,000 to $563,833,000, due mainly to the net profit after tax earned in the year of $130,230,000.
The available cash balance at 30 June 2012 was $185,242,000 (2011: $79,485,000).
A net deferred tax asset of $22,215,000 was recognised at 30 June 2012 (2011: Nil). The recognition of the net deferred tax asset is largely attributable to the booking of previously unrecognised tax losses. These losses have been booked on the basis that current operational forecasts indicate that is it probable that future taxable losses will be generated to utilise the tax losses booked.
Property, plant and equipment, mine properties and capitalised exploration had a combined value at 30 June 2012 of $409,049,000 (2011: $401,370,000). The increase of $7,679,000 was due mainly to mine development expenditure at Leonora and capitalised exploration.
Trade and other payables increased to $55,542,000 at 30 June 2012 (2011: $49,366,000) reflecting the higher level of expenditure, mainly at Leonora.
Derivative financial liabilities increased to $16,377,000 at 30 June 2012 (2011: $10,468,000) reflecting the change in the net fair value of the gold put and call options. These derivative financial liabilities will reverse over time as the options mature.
NET DEBT
Net debt, comprising total borrowings less cash on hand, was net cash of $180,986,000 at 30 June 2012 (2011: net cash of $67,413,000). As at 30 June 2012 total interest bearing borrowings amounted to $4,256,000 (30 June 2011: $12,072,000), including lease facilities of $2,016,000 and insurance premium funding of $1,976,000. The decrease in interest bearing borrowings in the 2012 financial year represents the repayment of the GE asset financing facility in August 2011.
Significant changes in the state of affairs
The significant changes in the state of affairs of the Company during the financial year are as follows:
A) NET PROFIT FOR THE YEAR
The Group reported a net profit after tax for the year of $130,230,000, which reduced the accumulated losses of the Group to $48,977,000 at 30 June 2012.
B) IMPAIRMENT WRITE OFF
At 30 June 2012 the Group recognised an impairment write off in relation to plant and equipment, deferred mine operating development expenditure, capitalised mine development expenditure and capitalised exploration and evaluation expenditure at Southern Cross amounting to $10,219,000 before income tax.
C) INCREASE IN NET ASSETS
The Group’s net assets increased by $127,486,000 during the year due mainly to net profit after tax and a reduction in the
D) CHANGES IN ISSUED CAPITAL
During February and March 2012, the Company bought back 995,000 shares at an average price of $2.25 per share, reducing share capital by $2,239,000.
Likely developments and expected results of operations
The Company will continue to focus on achieving profitable production with an emphasis on value adding growth. The current remaining mine life of the Southern Cross operations is four months with the processing plant expected to be placed on care and maintenance in November 2012. The Leonora operations will continue as a high margin, long life production centre for the Company.
On 29 June 2012, it was announced that St Barbara and Allied Gold Mining Plc (“Allied Gold”) had reached agreement to combine the two companies through a scheme of arrangement. Under the terms of the offer, St Barbara will acquire the entire issued and to be issued ordinary share capital of Allied Gold for $1.025 in cash, and 0.8 St Barbara shares for each Allied Gold share. Based on the closing price of St Barbara shares on the Australian Securities Exchange on 28 June 2012, being the last trading day before the announcement, the offer values Allied Gold at $556 million.
Funding the cash component of the offer, amounting to approximately $209 million, will be from St Barbara’s existing available cash reserves and a $120 million four year term facility from National Australia Bank and Barclays Bank Plc.
On 14 August 2012, the shareholders of Allied Gold voted in favour of the scheme of arrangement. The court hearing in the UK to sanction the scheme is to be held on 30 August 2012. The effective date of the combination, subject to court approval, is expected to be by 7 September 2012.
Management will review the Allied Gold operations after the combination is approved to determine the expected financial results of the operations and likely developments.
Further information about anticipated developments in the operations of St Barbara and the anticipated results of those operations in future financial years have not been included in this report because there is insufficient certainty to warrant disclosure.
Regulatory environment
The Company’s mining activities are all in Western Australia and are governed by Western Australian legislation, including the Mining Act 1978 , the Mines Safety and Inspection Act 1994 , Dangerous Goods Safety Act 2004 and other mining related and subsidiary legislation. The Group is subject to significant environmental regulation, including, inter alia , the Western Australian Environmental Protection Act 1986 , Contaminated Sites Act 2003 , Wildlife Conservation Act 1950 , Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972 and the Commonwealth Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 , as well as safety compliance in respect of its mining and exploration activities.
26
The Company is registered pursuant to the National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting Act 2007 under which it is required to report energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions for its operations for the twelve months ending 30 June. St Barbara also reports to Government pursuant to both the Energy Efficiency Opportunities Act 2006 and the National Environmental Protection (National Pollutant Inventory) Measure (subsidiary legislation to the National Environmental Protection Measures (Implementation) Act 1998 ). The Company has established data collection systems and processes to meet these reporting obligations.
In addition, the Company’s Australian operations will be required to comply with the Australian Federal Government’s Clean Energy Act 2011 , which has been enacted as at the date of this report to apply from 1 July 2012.
Information on Directors
S J COLIN WISE LL.B, FAICD, FAusIMM
Chairman – Non Executive
Mr Wise is an experienced corporate lawyer, consultant and company director with significant expertise in the mining and exploration industry and resources, energy and corporate sectors. He spent 24 years with WMC Limited, 10 of which as General Counsel and subsequently, 4 years as Counsel to a New York law firm. He has extensive practical experience in Australia and internationally with a wide range of corporate, operational and legal matters.
He has been Chairman of St Barbara since mid 2004, and is a Fellow of both the Australian Institute of Company Directors and the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Until recently he was a member of the Advisory Board to the Dean of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences at Monash University and was a Non Executive Director for 5 years of Southern Health, the largest health care service in Victoria, Chair of its Quality Committee, and a member of the Audit Committee.
Other current public company directorships
Straits Resources Limited
Former public company directorships in last 3 years
Nil
Special responsibilities
Chairman of the Board
Member of the Remuneration, Audit and Health & Safety Committees
Interest in shares and options
Mr Wise has a relevant interest in 1,139,389 fully paid ordinary shares of the Company.
TIMOTHY J LEHANY B.E., MBA, MAusIMM
Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer
Mr Lehany is a mining engineer with extensive operating experience over the past twenty years with a number of mining companies, including Newcrest Mining Ltd and WMC Ltd. His roles covered gold, base metal and nickel mines.
Other current public company directorships
Nil
Former public company directorships in last 3 years
Special responsibilities
Nil
Interest in shares and options
Mr Lehany has a relevant interest in 167,822 fully paid ordinary shares and holds 976,220 unlisted options to acquire fully paid ordinary shares, subject to performance hurdles, and holds 1,217,440 performance rights that will convert into shares subject to performance hurdles. The details of the unlisted options and performance rights are provided later in this Report.
DOUGLAS W BAILEY, BBus (Acc), CPA, ACIS
Non Executive Director
Mr Bailey was the Chief Financial Officer of Woodside Petroleum Ltd between 2002 and 2004 and previously, was an Executive Director of Ashton Mining Limited from 1990 to 2000, including the last 3 years as Chief Executive Officer. He was also a Non Executive Director of Aurora Gold Ltd for the period 1993–2000.
Other current public company directorships
Tap Oil Limited
Former public company directorships in last 3 years
Nil
Special responsibilities
Chairman of the Audit Committee
Member of the Remuneration Committee
Interest in shares and options
Mr Bailey has a relevant interest in 30,247 fully paid ordinary shares.
ELIZABETH A (BETSY) DONAGHEY B.Sc(Eng) M.S
Non Executive Director
Ms Donaghey is a civil engineer with extensive oil & gas industry and corporate experience. This included roles with BHP Billiton for 19 years in gas marketing, reservoir engineering and business planning and analysis.
Ms Donaghey also spent 9 years with Woodside Energy in various senior gas business and strategic planning roles, culminating in Ms Donaghey’s executive leadership of Woodside Energy’s Australian business unit, with assets generating annual revenue exceeding $1 billion and new projects with $1.5 billion capital investment and, subsequently, the business unit developing the Browse LNG project.
Ms Donaghey is a member of the Board of the Australian Renewable Energy Agency, an independent statutory authority established by the Commonwealth Government.
Other current public company directorships
Imdex Limited
Former public company directorships in last 3 years
Nil
Special responsibilities
Member of the Remuneration and Health & Safety Committees
Interest in shares and options
Ms Donaghey has a relevant interest in 40,000 fully paid ordinary shares of the Company.
Nil
Annual Report 2012 27
Directors’ Report cont.
PHILLIP C LOCKYER M.Sc, AWASM, DipMETALL
Non Executive Director
Mr Lockyer is an experienced mining engineer and metallurgist with over 40 years experience in the mineral industry with an emphasis on gold and nickel, in both underground and open pit operations. Mr Lockyer was employed by WMC Resources for 20 years, and as General Manager for WA was responsible for that Company’s nickel division and gold operations. Mr Lockyer also held the position of Director Operations for Dominion Mining Limited and Resolute Limited.
Other current public company directorships
Focus Minerals Limited
Western Desert Resources Limited
Swick Mining Services Limited
CGA Mining Limited
Former public company directorships in last 3 years
Nil
Special responsibilities
Chairman of the Health & Safety Committee
Member of the Audit Committee
Interest in shares and options
Mr Lockyer has a relevant interest in 20,631 fully paid ordinary shares of the Company.
ROBERT K RAE B.Com (Hons), FAICD
Non Executive Director
Mr Rae is a Director and Partner of McClintock Associates, a private investment bank and advisory firm and has extensive industry and corporate experience. Mr Rae has held previous directorships within the mining industry, including Plutonic Resources Limited, Ashton Mining Limited, WA Diamond Trust and Centralian Minerals Limited. Mr Rae is also a member of the Salvation Army Advisory Board.
Other current public company directorships
McClintock Associates Securities Limited
SCEGGS Darlinghurst Limited
SHEM Limited
Former public company directorships in last 3 years
Nil
Special responsibilities
Chairman of the Remuneration Committee
Member of the Audit Committee
Interest in shares and options
Mr Rae has a relevant interest in 48,976 fully paid ordinary shares of the Company.
Qualifications and experience of the company secretary
ROSS J KENNEDY BComm, Grad.Dip – Company Secretarial Practice, ACA, FTIA, MAusIMM, FAICD, ACIS Company Secretary
Mr Kennedy has more than 25 years experience as a public company secretary and has held a number of public company directorships in resources and technology companies. He has extensive experience in corporate management, including risk management, corporate governance, finance, accounting, commercial negotiations, takeovers, legal contracts, land management, human resources, statutory compliance and public reporting.
Meetings of Directors
The number of meetings of Directors (including meetings of Committees of Directors), and the numbers of meetings attended by each of the Directors of the Company during the financial year was:
| Board | Audit Committee | Remuneration Committee |
Health & Safety Committee |
|---|---|---|---|
| A B |
A B |
A B |
A B |
| S J C Wise 10 11 T J Lehany 11 11 D W Bailey 11 11 P C Lockyer 11 11 R Rae 11 11 E A Donaghey 11 11 |
3 3 – – 3 3 3 3 3 3 – – |
5 5 – – 5 5 – – 5 5 5 5 |
3 3 – – – – 3 3 – – 3 3 |
A = Number of meetings attended
B = Number of meetings held during the time the Director held office or was a member of the committee during the year
28
Remuneration report (Audited)
INTRODUCTION
This Remuneration Report forms part of the Directors Report for the year ended 30 June 2012. It describes the alignment of remuneration strategies with Company strategies for value creation, remuneration related decision making authorities within the Company and the remuneration principles that applied for the 2012 financial year. The Report also provides details of remuneration paid for the 2012 financial year to Directors and senior executives; collectively referred to as Key Management Personnel.
OVERVIEW OF CONTENTS
-
Strategy and industry context;
-
Decision making authorities for remuneration at St Barbara;
-
Principles applied in determining the structure and amount of remuneration;
-
Company performance;
-
Details of remuneration paid; and
-
Summaries of service agreements for Executive Key Management Personnel.
1. Strategy and Industry Context
COMPANY STRATEGY
The Company’s strategies for the 2012 financial year have been to build on existing organisational capabilities and business systems to reliably underpin sustained long term profitability and cash generation from the Company’s existing gold assets, and to create opportunities for further growing value per share. In particular:
-
Delivering consistent and reliable operational performance;
-
Creating and sustaining a safe working environment;
-
Maintaining effective community relations;
-
Delivering superior returns on assets;
-
Optimising cash flow from operations including driving Gwalia cash operating costs lower to improve margins;
-
Pursuing organic growth through mine life extension for the Gwalia mine;
-
Pursuing growth through acquisition of value accretive gold mineral resources, ore reserves, prospective exploration land prospects, and/or production capacity in the Australasian region;
-
Pursuing exploration discoveries with potential for more than 1 million ounces of gold; and
-
Continuing to develop organisation capability as a core competency for competitive advantage.
INDUSTRY CONTEXT
The Company is a gold producer with revenue for the 2012 financial year of $541,189,000 and operates predominantly in Western Australia with three operating underground mines and two processing plants. As at 30 June 2012, the Company workforce was comprised of 275 employees and 644 contractors. The Company competes for labour within the broader Australian resources sector and benchmarks its remuneration systems and levels against comparable companies in Australia.
REMUNERATION STRATEGY
The objectives of the Remuneration strategy for the 2012 financial year, consistent with the Company Strategy, were to ensure that:
-
total remuneration for senior executives and each level of the workforce was market competitive;
-
key employees were retained;
-
total remuneration for executives and managers comprised an appropriate proportion of fixed remuneration and remuneration at risk;
-
remuneration “at risk” encouraged and rewarded high performance aligned with value creation for shareholders, through an appropriate mix of short and long term incentives;
-
the integrity of the remuneration review processes delivered fair and equitable outcomes; and
-
remuneration for Non Executive Directors preserved their independence by being in the form of fixed fees.
The remuneration strategy, policy and structure are essentially unchanged from the previous reporting period and are directly linked to the development of strategies and budgets in the Company’s annual planning cycle:
| Month | Financial/Strategy | Remuneration |
|---|---|---|
| October | Annual strategy update | |
| January | Review STI & LTI | |
| design framework | ||
| February | Half Year Financial Report | |
| April | Budget setting framework | Agree |
| Remuneration | ||
| Review | ||
| Framework | ||
| Agree STI Targets | ||
| for following | ||
| financial year | ||
| July | Measure STI | |
| outcomes and | ||
| determine award | ||
| Award LTI grants | ||
| August | Annual Financial Report | |
| October | Annual Report | |
| November | Annual General Meeting | Shareholder |
| approval of LTI | ||
| Grant |
KEY DEVELOPMENTS
On 29 June 2012, the Company announced that agreement had been reached with Allied Gold Mining Plc to combine the two companies through a scheme of arrangement on terms considered to be value enhancing for shareholders of both companies. Under the terms of the Offer, St Barbara will acquire the issued capital of Allied Gold Mining Plc for consideration of 0.8 St Barbara shares plus A$1.025 cash for each Allied Gold Mining Plc share.
Annual Report 2012 29
Directors’ Report cont.
On 14 August 2012, the shareholders of Allied Gold Mining Plc voted in favour of the scheme of arrangement. The scheme is due to be sanctioned by a UK court on 30 August 2012. Subject to this approval, St Barbara anticipates the combination will be effective by 7 September 2012. Further information is available on the Company’s website at www.stbarbara.com.au
The King of the Hills mine at Leonora, which commenced gold production in May 2011, achieved sustainable long term gold production rates in the 2012 financial year. The Gwalia mine, also at Leonora, achieved a significant increase in the grade of ore mined, as production was sourced entirely from the higher grade South West Branch lode. This resulted in lower unit costs per ounce of gold produced, increased margins and increased cash flow from operations.
Further details are set out in the discussion and analysis of operating results on page 23.
2. Decision making authorities for remuneration at St Barbara
Remuneration strategy and policies are approved by the Board. They are aligned with, and underpin, the corporate strategy as set out in Section 1 of this Remuneration Report. On behalf of the Board, the Remuneration Committee oversees and reviews the effectiveness of the remuneration strategy, policies and practices to ensure that the interests of the Company, shareholders and employees are properly taken into account. The charter for the Remuneration Committee is approved by the Board and is available on the Company’s web site at www.stbarbara.com.au
The Remuneration Committee is responsible for making recommendations to the Board on all aspects of remuneration arrangements for the five Non Executive Directors, the Managing Director and CEO, and the Executive General Managers with the authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the activities of the Company; collectively referred to as the Key Management Personnel.
In addition, the Remuneration Committee oversees and reviews proposed levels of annual organisation remuneration increases and key employee related policies. It also receives reports on organisation capability and effectiveness, skills, training and development and succession planning for key roles.
==> picture [238 x 170] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Organisational Key Workforce Policies
Capability and - Equal Opportunity
Scenario Planning - Diversity
Remuneration
Committee
Oversight and Design
Remuneration Design Remuneration levels
- Fixed vs Variable for Key Management
Personnel
----- End of picture text -----
The members of the Remuneration Committee are all independent, Non Executive Directors and as at the date of this report comprised:
R K Rae – Chair, Non Executive Director D W Bailey – Non Executive Director E A Donaghey – Non Executive Director S J C Wise – Non Executive Director
In forming remuneration recommendations, the Remuneration Committee obtains and considers each year industry specific independent data and professional advice as appropriate. All reports and professional advice relating to the Managing Director and CEO’s remuneration are commissioned and received directly by the Committee. The Committee reviews all other contracts with remuneration consultants and directly receives the reports of those consultants.
The Remuneration Committee has delegated authority to the Managing Director and CEO for approving remuneration recommendations for employees other than Executive Key Management Personnel, within the parameters of approved Companywide remuneration levels and structures.
3. Principles applied in determining the structure and amount of remuneration
The Company’s remuneration strategy recognises that it needs to attract, reward and retain high calibre, high performing, and team orientated individuals capable of delivering and being incentivised to deliver the Company Strategy. The remuneration policy and related employment policies and practices are aligned with this strategy.
The Company operates a performance based remuneration system through which the remuneration of Executive Key Management Personnel is linked to the financial and nonfinancial performance of the Company and its share price.
Under the remuneration system the amount of at risk remuneration relative to an employee’s total remuneration increases in line with the seniority of the role of that employee. This reinforces the linkage between personal and company performance and achievement of the Company’s business strategy and creation of shareholder wealth.
(A) NON EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS’ FEES
Non Executive Directors’ fees are reviewed annually by the Board to ensure fees are appropriate to reflect the responsibilities and time commitments required of Non Executive Directors and to ensure that the Company continues to attract and retain Non Executive Directors of a high calibre. The Board seeks the advice of, and is guided by, specialist independent remuneration consultants in this process. Currently Non Executive Directors’ fees are targeted between the median and the 75th percentile of comparatively sized companies.
In order to maintain their independence and impartiality, the fees paid to Non Executive Directors are not linked to the performance of the Company. Non Executive Directors have no involvement in the day to day management of the Company.
Superannuation contributions, in accordance with legislation, are included as part of each Director’s total remuneration. Directors may elect to increase the proportion of their remuneration taken as superannuation subject to legislative limits. Non Executive Directors are not entitled to retirement benefits, bonuses or equity based incentives.
30
The total amount that can be paid to all Non Executive Directors is set by shareholders. This is currently $750,000 per annum in aggregate (approved by shareholders in November 2005). Within that amount, the basis and level of fees paid to Non Executive Directors is set by the Board, and reported to shareholders each year, as detailed in Section 5 of this Remuneration Report.
(B) EXECUTIVE REMUNERATION
The reward structures for the Company’s executives are strongly aligned with shareholders’ interests by:
-
recognising the contribution of each senior executive to the achievement of the Company’s strategy and business objectives;
-
rewarding high individual performance;
-
being market competitive to attract and retain high calibre individuals;
-
ensuring that equity based remuneration through the long term incentive plan is based on achieving superior total shareholder return over a three year period.
To achieve these objectives, remuneration for executives is comprised of fixed remuneration and variable or at risk remuneration. The at risk component is comprised of separate short term and long term incentives in which the former are linked to specific personal and corporate/business unit objectives and the latter are linked to medium term strategic corporate objectives. Both provide a direct connection between achievement of targets which drive Company performance and shareholder wealth, with personal remuneration. The mix of fixed and at risk remuneration varies according to the role of each executive, with the highest level of at risk remuneration applied to those roles that have the greatest potential to influence and deliver Company outcomes and drive shareholder wealth.
The mix of fixed and at risk remuneration for executives is as follows:
| follows: | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed | Total | |||
| remun- | remun- | |||
| Seniority | eration | STI(1) | LTI(2) | eration |
| Level 6 | ||||
| (CEO) | 40% | 20% | 40% | 100% |
| Level 5 | ||||
| (Exec GM) | 50% | 20% | 30% | 100% |
| Level 4 (GM) | 57% | 17% | 26% | 100% |
(1) The STI value shown is at “target” performance. Target is the mid-point in a range of 0–200% for the rated performance of each individual. Less than target performance will result in less than the target allocation, potentially down to zero, and out performance can theoretically lead to two times the target allocation
(2) The LTI allocation is fixed at grant, but the proportion of the grant that vests, if any, is subject to performance measurement under the relevant LTI plan. See details below.
(i) Fixed Remuneration
(a) Base salary
Total Fixed Remuneration = Base Salary + Superannuation + Benefits
The base salary for each executive is influenced by the nature and responsibilities of the role, the knowledge, skills and experience required for the position, and the Company’s need to compete in the market place to attract and retain the right person for the role.
Each senior executive undergoes an annual performance review as part of the Company’s work performance system, in which individual and company performance is assessed in detail against pre-determined measures. The performance appraisal for each senior executive is assessed by the Managing Director and CEO and reported to the Remuneration Committee and later, the Board for review, including recommended remuneration outcomes that flow from that appraisal. For the Managing Director and CEO the performance appraisal is undertaken by the Chairman, is also reported to the Remuneration Committee and later, the Board, for review.
(ii) Fixed Remuneration – Superannuation
In addition to statutory superannuation contributions, senior executives may elect to contribute additional amounts, subject to legislative limits.
(iii) Fixed Remuneration – Benefits
Executives may receive benefits, including car parking and payment for certain professional memberships.
Total Fixed Remuneration for each executive role is benchmarked against the 75th percentile of prevailing comparable market rates, to ensure that the Company is able to attract and retain a talented and capable workforce appropriate to meet its current and anticipated needs.
(iv) Variable Remuneration – Short term incentives (STI)
The STI is an annual “at risk” component of remuneration for executives. It is payable based on performance against key performance indicators (KPIs) set at the beginning of the financial year. STIs are structured to remunerate senior executives for achieving annual Company targets as well as their own individual performance targets designed to favourably impact the business, which are weighted on an equal (50:50) basis at Target. Company and individual targets are established by reference to the Company Strategy (refer Section 1). The net amount of any STI after allowing for applicable taxation, is payable in cash.
For each KPI there are defined “threshold”, “target” and “stretch” measures which are capable of objective assessment.
Threshold performance typically requires achievement of the full year budget for quantifiable measures such as safety, profitability, cash generation, as well as the achievement of criteria set as near term goals linked to the annual strategy review.
Target performance represents challenging but achievable levels of performance beyond achievement of budget measures.
For example, the Corporate NPAT STI at Target was set at 10% above budget NPAT for the year. Stretch performance requires significant performance above and beyond normal expectations and if achieved is anticipated to result in a substantial improvement in key strategic outcomes, operational or financial results, and/ or the business performance of the Company.
The Remuneration Committee is responsible for recommending to the Board executive STIs and then later assessing the extent to which the Company STI measures and the individual KPIs of the senior executives have been achieved, and the amount to be paid to each executive. To assist in making this assessment, the Committee receives detailed reports and presentations on the performance of the business from the Managing Director & CEO and independent remuneration consultants as required.
Annual Report 2012 31
Directors’ Report cont.
(v) Variable Remuneration – Long term incentives (LTI)
LTIs are structured to reward executives for the long term performance of the Company relative to its peers and, commencing with the 2011 financial year, were granted in the form of Performance Rights. Previously, LTIs were granted in the form of unlisted employee options.
In considering the LTI awards for the 2012 financial year, the Board considered the trend towards deferring a portion of the award. Unlike other industries where matching revenues and expenses may have long lead times, the gold industry is such that gold produced is sold at arm’s length within a matter of days from production. Revenue and expenses are then recorded. The industry characteristics supporting a look back testing of prior year performance awards do not carry the same weight in our industry.
Vesting conditions
The vesting of performance rights granted in respect of the 2012 financial year is subject to continuing employment as at the vesting date, and the Company achieving a Relative Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”) at the 50th percentile or better, for the period from the performance rights pricing date to 30 June 2014.
In view of the elevated levels of corporate takeovers and mergers over the last two years involving ASX listed gold companies, and the difficulty in maintaining a stable TSR comparator group, for performance rights to be issued in respect of future years, it is envisaged that multiple performance vesting conditions will apply, linked to the Company’s strategic plan.
For FY13 performance rights the vesting performance conditions will comprise:
-
Relative Total Shareholder Returns;
-
A measure of net growth in Ore Reserves as a proxy for increasing mine life; and
-
Return on assets as a measure of capital efficiency and generation of shareholder value.
No performance rights have been granted since the end of the 2012 financial year.
The Relative Total Shareholder Return (Relative TSR) is measured against a defined peer group of companies which the Board considers compete with the Company for the same investment capital, both in Australia and overseas, and which by the nature of their business are influenced by commodity prices and other external factors similar to those that impact on the TSR performance of the Company.
The LTI measurement methodology for Total Shareholder Returns for comparator companies is as follows:
-
a. The TSR performance is calculated for each of the comparator companies that continue to be listed on ASX for the duration of the vesting period (“continuing company”); and
-
b. The TSR performance of a comparator company that ceases to be listed on ASX during the vesting period as a consequence of a takeover or merger (“exiting company”) is measured:
-
ii. the pro-rata arithmetic average TSR of the continuing companies (excluding St Barbara) for the remainder of the vesting period,
-
c. The TSR performance of a comparator company that ceased to be listed on ASX during the vesting period (for any reason other than as a consequence of a takeover or merger) is measured as the percentage change divided by the period.
-
(1) “Pro rata” means the TSR of the exiting company, multiplied by the number of days from the first day of the LTI measurement period until the date on which the company ceases to be listed on the ASX, divided by the total number of days in the vesting period.
Example 1: Company A ceases to exist at end of year 2 on account of a takeover with 90% TSR and for year 3 the arithmetic average of the continuing companies is 30%, the deemed TSR for Company A is (2/3 x 90%) + (1/3 x 30%) = 70%.
Example 2: Company A fails as a company at the end of year 1 and ceases to be listed (whatever the actual TSR) the deemed TSR for Company A is -33% (being -100% divided by 3 years).
At the discretion of the Board, the composition of the comparator group of companies may vary from time to time. The composition of the comparator group pertaining to an LTI issued in a financial year is listed in the corresponding annual report. The peer group for the 2012 financial year comprised the following ASX listed, mid tier gold companies.
| Company | ||
|---|---|---|
| Intrepid Mines Limited | Resolute Mining Limited | |
| Ramelius Resources Limited | Silver Lake Resources Limited | |
| Saracen Mineral Holdings Limited | Catalpa Resources Limited(2) | |
| Kingsgate Consolidated Limited | Unity Mining Limited | |
| Regis Resources Limited | Oceana Gold Corporation | |
| (2) On 14 October 2011 Catalpa Resources Ltd combined with Conquest | ||
| Mining Ltd to form Evolution Mining | Ltd. |
Under the Plan Rules that apply for FY12 performance rights, which rely upon a single performance measure of Relative TSR, the percentage of rights that can vest is in accordance with the following rules:
| following rules: | |
|---|---|
| Relative TSR Performance Over | |
| Measurement Period | % of Right to Vest |
| < 50th percentile | 0% |
| 50th percentile | 50% |
| >50th & < 75th percentiles | Pro-rata between 50% |
| & 100% | |
| 75th percentile and above | 100% |
In the event that St Barbara does not achieve the 50th percentile or better for the vesting period ending 30 June 2014, no performance rights will vest.
Expiry and other conditions
All performance rights expire on the earlier of their expiry date, immediately upon the effective resignation date of the relevant executive or twelve months from the date of retirement or retrenchment.
- i. up to the date of that Company ceasing to be listed on ASX adjusted pro rata[(1)] for the remainder of the vesting period; plus
32
Performance rights granted under the plan carry no dividend or voting rights. On vesting each performance right is convertible into one ordinary share.
The assessed fair value at the grant date of performance rights is allocated equally over the period from grant date to vesting date, and the amount is included in the following table. Fair values at grant date are based on the prevailing market price on the date the right is granted.
| Vesting | Exercise | 10 day VWAP | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Key Features of | conditions | Price | at start |
| LTI Performance | “Other | Vesting | 30 June 2014 |
| Rights at a glance | conditions” | Date |
A Monte Carlo simulation is then performed to determine the probability of the market conditions associated with the rights being met. The probability estimated by the Monte Carlo
simulation is then applied to the fair value. For rights issued during the year ended 30 June 2012, taking into account the impact of the market condition (as discussed above), the estimated fair value was, for accounting purposes, $2,073,000.
Further information on performance rights is set out in Notes 37 and 38 to the Financial Statements.
Illustrative example of performance rights calculation
| Executive Total Fixed Remuneration (TFR) | $400,000 |
|---|---|
| LTI award value (60% of TFR) | $240,000 |
| 10 day VWAP performance rights price | $1.845 per |
| performance right | |
| Performance Rights to be granted | 130,082 |
| ($240,000 ÷ $1.845) |
4. Company Performance
In assessing the Company’s performance and improvement in shareholder wealth, consideration is given to the following measures in respect of the current financial year and the previous four financial years. Company revenues have grown strongly each year since 2008, with a significant improvement in profitability.
| Earnings 2008 $’000 2009 $’000 2010 $’000 2011 $’000 |
2012 $’000 |
|---|---|
| Sales revenue 143,129 281,129 296,760 359,575 EBITDA(1) 12,340 39,701 33,793 125,538 Statutory Profit/(loss) after tax(1) (17,333) (76,344) (40,188) 68,629 Underlying net profit/(loss) after tax(1) (29,291) 209 14,547 54,431 |
541,189 204,034 130,230 130,782 |
(1) Refer definitions on page 22.
==> picture [222 x 106] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Sales Revenue ($M)
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
0 120 240 360 480 600
----- End of picture text -----
==> picture [223 x 106] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
EBITDA¹ ($M)
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
0 50 100 150 200 250
----- End of picture text -----
Statutory Profit/(Loss) After Tax¹ ($M)
Underlying Net Profit/(Loss) After Tax¹ ($M)
==> picture [467 x 88] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
2008 2008
2009 2009
2010 2010
2011 2011
2012 2012
-100 -50 0 50 100 150 -50 -10 30 70 110 150
----- End of picture text -----
(1) Refer definitions on page 22.
Annual Report 2012 33
Directors’ Report cont.
The table below provides the share price performance of the Company’s shares in the 2012 financial year and the previous four financial years.
| financial years. | |
|---|---|
| Share price history 2008 2009 2010 2011 |
2012 |
| Period end share price ($ per share) 2.22 1.38 2.10 1.96 Average share price for the year ($ per share) 3.84 1.74 1.68 2.16 |
1.77 2.12 |
During the 2012 financial year, the Company’s daily closing share price traded in a range of $1.77 to $2.52 per share (2011: $1.74 to $3.00 per share)
==> picture [222 x 105] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Gold Production (koz)
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
----- End of picture text -----
==> picture [219 x 106] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Net Cashflow ($M)
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
-100 -50 0 50 100 150
----- End of picture text -----
Total Recordable Injury Frequency Rate (TRIFR) (measured on a 12 month rolling basis)
Return on Equity[(1)] (%)
==> picture [465 x 87] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
2008
2009
2009
2010
2010
2011
2011
2012 2012
0 5 10 15 20 -40 -20 0 20 40
----- End of picture text -----
(1) Return on Equity (“ROE”) is Statutory Profit divided by average Total Equity (calculated as the average of the opening and closing balances). ROE is a non-IFRS financial measure.
The Board has regard to the overall performance of the Company over a number of years in assessing and ensuring proper alignment of the “at risk” remuneration framework to deliver fair and proper outcomes consistent with the Company’s performance.
34
5. Remuneration paid
Details of the remuneration of Directors and the senior executives of the Company during the year ended 30 June 2012 are set out in the following tables.
| the following tables. | the following tables. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Short-term benefits |
Post- employment benefits Long-term benefits |
||||
| Name | Cash salary & fees $ STI payment $ Non- monetary benefits(6) $ Other $ |
Super- annuation $ |
Long Service Leave(3) $ Share- based payments(4) $ Termin- ation payments $ |
Total $ |
Proportion of total perfor- mance related Value of share based payments as % of total |
| Non Executive Directors | |||||
| S J C Wise (Chairman) D W Bailey P C Lockyer R K Rae E A Donaghey |
219,225 – 15,577(5) – 107,798 – – – 107,798 – – – 107,798 – – – 100,000 – – – |
15,775 9,702 9,702 9,702 9,000 |
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – |
250,577 117,500 117,500 117,500 109,000 |
– – – – – – – – – – |
| Total Non Executive Directors |
642,619 – 15,577 – |
53,881 | – – – |
712,077 | |
| Executive Director | |||||
| T J Lehany | 832,225 675,220 5,810 – |
15,775 | 72,407 639,020 **– ** |
2,240,457 | 30.1% 28.5% |
| Other key management personnel | |||||
| G Campbell-Cowan A Croll(1) D Rose(2) R Kennedy P Uttley |
434,625 297,151 2,905 – 224,680 128,503 549 50,000(7) 264,965 85,763 2,572 – 348,225 236,009 2,905 – 373,625 239,189 2,905 – |
15,775 6,220 9,202 15,775 15,775 |
20,328 177,468 – 2,612 36,233 – – – 330,716 7,957 153,966 – 912 155,855 – |
948,252 448,797 693,218 764,837 788,261 |
31.3% 18.7% 28.6% 8.1% 12.4% – 30.9% 20.1% 30.3% 19.8% |
| Total Senior Executives |
2,478,345 1,661,835 17,646 50,000 |
78,522 | 104,216 1,162,542 **330,716 ** |
5,883,822 |
(1) A Croll commenced employment as Chief Operating Officer on 16 January 2012.
(2) D Rose resigned with effect on 31 January 2012.
(3) For current employees, the amount represents the long service leave expense accrued for the period.
(4) The value of options/performance rights disclosed as remuneration is the portion of the fair value of the options/performance rights recognised in the reporting period.
(5) Represents car parking, mobile phone, and other administrative benefits.
(6) For the Senior Executives, Non monetary benefits comprise car parking and professional memberships.
(7) Represents a sign-on payment.
Annual Report 2012 35
Directors’ Report cont.
| 2011 Short-term benefits |
2011 Short-term benefits |
Post- employment benefits Long-term benefits |
Post- employment benefits Long-term benefits |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name | Cash salary & fees $ STI payment $ Non- monetary benefits(6) $ Other $ |
Super- annuation $ |
Long Service Leave(3) $ Share- based payments(4) $ Termin- ation payments $ |
Total $ |
Proportion of total perfor- mance related Value of share based payments as % of total |
| Non Executive Directors | |||||
| S J C Wise (Chairman) D W Bailey B J Gibson(1) P C Lockyer R K Rae E A Donaghey(2) |
184,801 – 16,469(5) – 100,000 – – – 39,716 – – – 100,000 – – – 98,893 – – – 22,392 – – – |
15,199 9,000 3,574 9,000 8,900 2,015 |
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – |
216,469 109,000 43,290 109,000 107,793 24,407 |
– – – – – – – – – – – – |
| Total Non Executive Directors |
545,802 – 16,469 – |
47,688 | – – – |
609,959 | |
| Executive Director | |||||
| T J Lehany | 832,801 110,416 7,594 – |
15,199 | 22,878 242,048 – |
1,230,936 | 9.0% 19.7% |
| Other key management personnel | |||||
| G Campbell-Cowan D Rose R Kennedy P Uttley |
405,801 60,519 3,797 – 454,801 40,392 1,509 – 348,801 40,950 3,797 – 348,801 50,050 3,797 – |
15,199 15,199 15,199 15,199 |
18,771 48,987 – 6,090 85,133 – 12,696 45,883 – 4,651 66,208 – |
553,074 603,124 467,326 488,706 |
10.9% 8.9% 6.7% 14.1% 8.8% 9.8% 10.2% 13.5% |
| Total Senior Executives |
2,391,005 302,327 20,494 – |
75,995 | 65,086 488,259 **– ** |
3,343,166 |
(1) B J Gibson retired on 18 November 2010
(2) E A Donaghey was appointed on 4 April 2011.
(3) For current employees, the amount represents the long service leave expense accrued for the period.
(4) The value of options/performance rights disclosed as remuneration is the portion of the fair value of the options/performance rights recognised in the reporting period.
(5) Represents car parking, mobile phone, and other administrative benefits.
(6) For the Senior Executives, Non monetary benefits comprise car parking and professional memberships.
(A) NON EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS FEES
Non Executive Director fees for the 2012 financial year were determined, both as to their composition (for base fees and committee work) and overall level, based on advice from Ernst & Young as well as remuneration reports published by McDonald and Company. They comprised:
-
Director fees of $92,000;
-
an allowance for chairing a Board Committee of $17,000; and
-
a fee for serving as a member of a Board Committee of $8,500.
The Chairman’s fee for the 2012 financial year was set at $235,000 (inclusive of all Board Committee commitments), as well as benefits in the form of a car park, mobile telephone allowance and other administrative benefits.
This was determined independently, based on roles and responsibilities in the external market for companies comparable with St Barbara Limited. The Chairman was not present at any discussions relating to the determination of his own remuneration.
(B) EXECUTIVE KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL REMUNERATION
As set out in Section 4 of this Remuneration Report, in respect of the 2012 financial year the Company generated a 26% return on shareholder funds, which is materially above the Company’s weighted average cost of capital.
36
For the year, Key Management Personnel received market competitive fixed remuneration, and an STI award based on exceeding the Corporate and Individual targets set by the Board. The LTI performance hurdles applicable to 2009 LTIs issued in the form of employee options were not met as at 30 June 2012, resulting in no LTIs vesting as at 30 June 2012.
Further details are set out below.
(i) Fixed Remuneration – Base salary
In considering remuneration for Executive Key Management Personnel for the 2012 financial year, the Remuneration Committee retained Ernst & Young and considered reports from McDonald and Company, as well as industry trend data and other relevant remuneration information.
(ii) Variable Remuneration – Short term incentives (STI)
The Company STI measures that applied for the 2012 financial year comprised:
-
improved safety performance – measured in the form of a specified reduction in the Total Recordable Injury Frequency Rate by 30 June 2012;
-
the achievement of defined benchmarks:
-
in excess of the budgeted underlying net profit after tax for the 2012 financial year; and
-
in excess of the budgeted cash position as at 30 June 2012
(in each case, “target” performance was defined as at least 10% above budget.)
- a discretionary factor determined by the Board designed to take into account unexpected events and achievements during the year.
The actual gold revenue for determination of STI awards is normalised back to the gold price assumption contained in the budget. In calculating STI awards, Management does not receive the benefit, nor are they penalised for actual gold price movements away from the budget underlying assumptions.
For the 2012 financial year, the underlying net profit after tax, adjusted to budgeted gold price assumptions, exceeded STI “target” levels.
The individual performance measures varied according to the individual executive’s responsibilities, and for the 2012 financial year reflected a range of value accretive and/or risk mitigation achievements aligned with the Company strategy. These included measures relating to improving safety, lifting production volumes and lowering production costs, achieving exploration discoveries and implementing business improvement systems. They also included a discretionary factor determined by the Board designed to take into account unexpected events and achievements during the year.
The tables below describe the Short Term Incentives available to, and achieved by, senior executives during the year.
| 2012 | Maximum potential STI Actual STI included in remuneration $ % of maximum ‘Target’ STI earned % of maximum potential total STI earned % of maximum potential total STI foregone Target $ Stretch(1) $ |
|---|---|
| T J Lehany G Campbell-Cowan D Rose A Croll P Uttley R Kennedy |
424,000 848,000 675,220 100% 80% 20% 180,160 360,320 297,151 100% 82% 18% 109,667(2) 219,333(2) 85,763 78% 39% 61% 95,333(2) 190,667(2) 128,503 100% 67% 33% 155,760 311,520 239,189 100% 77% 23% 145,600 291,200 236,009 100% 81% 19% |
(1) Inclusive of STI “Target”
(2) Applied pro-rata for period of employment
Amounts shown as “Actual STI” represent the amounts accrued in relation to the 2012 financial year, based on achievement of the specified performance criteria. No additional amounts vest in future years in respect of the STI scheme for the 2012 financial year.
(v) Variable Remuneration – Long term incentives (LTI)
None of the LTI options granted in respect of the FY09 year vested as at 30 June 2012, as they did not meet the Relative Total Shareholder Return criteria. As a result, the following options did not vest and are no longer exercisable:
| T J Lehany | 251,350 |
|---|---|
| G Campbell-Cowan | 201,192 |
| R Kennedy | 156,774 |
Details on options currently issued to Key Management Personnel are set out in Notes 37 and 38 of the Financial Report.
Annual Report 2012 37
Directors’ Report cont.
(A) Analysis of options granted as compensation
| 2012 Options granted |
Value yet to vest |
|---|---|
| Number Date |
% vested in year % forfeited in year Financial year options vest Minimum (A) $ Maximum (B) $ |
| T J Lehany 976,220 19 Nov 2009 251,350 6 May 2009 G Campbell-Cowan 290,670 23 Sep 2009 201,192 6 May 2009 D Rose(1) 329,474 23 Sep 2009 P Uttley 256,258 23 Sep 2009 R Kennedy 256,258 23 Sep 2009 156,774 6 May 2009 |
– – 30 Jun 2013 Nil 114,928 – 100 30 Jun 2012 Nil – – – 30 Jun 2013 Nil 31,460 – 100 30 Jun 2012 Nil – – 100 30 Jun 2013 Nil – – – 30 Jun 2013 Nil 27,729 – – 30 Jun 2013 Nil 27,729 – 100 30 Jun 2012 Nil – |
(1) D Rose resigned as Chief Operating Officer on 31 January 2012.
A The minimum value of options yet to vest is $nil as the vesting service conditions, which are continuing service conditions and relative Total Shareholder Returns over a three year period, are still to be satisfied.
B The maximum value of the options yet to vest represents the amount of the grant date fair value of the options that is still to be expensed in the income statement.
(B) Analysis of movements in the value of options granted and exercised
During the reporting period, no new options were issued and no options vested. 329,474 options issued to D Rose expired thirty days following the date of his resignation from the Company. In addition, the following options in respect of the FY09 did not vest as at 30 June 2012 and are no longer exercisable:
| 30 June 2012 and are | no longer |
|---|---|
| T J Lehany | 251,350 |
| G Campbell-Cowan | 201,192 |
| R Kennedy | 156,774 |
(C) Performance Rights issued in the 2012 fiscal year.
Performance Rights Plan
All performance rights were granted under the previously approved St Barbara Limited Performance Rights Plan. Performance rights issued to Mr Lehany, Managing Director & CEO, were also approved by shareholders at the 2011 Annual General Meeting.
Performance Rights granted
Details on performance rights over ordinary shares in the Company that were granted as remuneration to each senior executive and details of performance rights that vested in the 2012 financial year are as follows:
| Fair value per | Number of | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of | Issue price | performance | performance | |||
| performance | per | right at grant | rights vested | |||
| rights granted | performance | date ($ per | during | |||
| 2012 | during 2012 | right | Grant date | Expiry date | share)(1) | FY2012 |
| T J Lehany | 459,621 | – | 23 Nov 2011 | 30 Jun 2014 | 1.10 | – |
| D Rose(2) | 152,846 | – | 28 Oct 2011 | 30 Jun 2014 | 1.12 | – |
| G Campbell-Cowan | 146,472 | – | 28 Oct 2011 | 30 Jun 2014 | 1.12 | – |
| R Kennedy | 118,374 | – | 28 Oct 2011 | 30 Jun 2014 | 1.12 | – |
| P Uttley | 126,634 | – | 28 Oct 2011 | 30 Jun 2014 | 1.12 | – |
| A Croll(3) | 169,106 | – | 15 Mar 2012 | 30 Jun 2014 | 1.05 | – |
(1) The fair value of performance rights at grant date was determined using a Black-Scholes valuation to which a Monte Carlo simulation was applied to determine the probability of the market conditions associated with the rights being met. This methodology complied with the requirements of Australian Accounting standard AASB 2 Share Based Payments .
(2) D Rose resigned as Chief Operating Officer on 31 January 2012.
(3) A Croll commenced employment as Chief Operating Office on 16 January 2012.
38
6. Summaries of service agreements for Executive Key Management Personnel
Remuneration and other terms of employment for the Managing Director and CEO and the senior executives are formalised in service agreements. These agreements provide, where applicable, for the provision of performance related cash bonuses, other benefits including allowances, and participation in the St Barbara Limited Executive Option and Performance Rights Plans. Other major provisions of the agreements relating to remuneration are set out below.
All contracts with senior executives may be terminated early by either party giving the required notice and subject to termination payments as detailed below.
All service agreements with senior executives, including with the Managing Director and CEO comply with the provisions of Part 2 D.2, Division 2 of the Corporations Act 2001.
T J Lehany – Managing Director and CEO
-
Term of agreement – permanent employee, commencement 2 March 2009.
-
Payment of a termination benefit for early termination by the Company, other than for serious misconduct or serious breach of duty:
-
a) Where 6 months notice of termination is given; an additional 6 months base salary and superannuation payment, and (at the discretion of the Board), any entitlement to a ‘stretch performance’ payment plus an amount equivalent to six months of notional ‘target performance’ payment; or
-
b) Where notice of immediate termination is given, 12 months base salary and superannuation, plus (at the discretion of the Board) an amount equivalent to 12 months of a notional ‘target performance’ payment.
The other Executive Key Management Personnel are all permanent employees, entitled to payment of a termination benefit on early termination by the Company, other than for gross misconduct or for poor performance as judged by the Company in its absolute discretion, equal to between 6 and 8 months base salary and superannuation.
Loans to Directors and executives
There were no loans to Directors or executives during the financial year 2012.
This concludes the Remuneration Report.
Indemnification and insurance of officers
The Company indemnifies all Directors of the Company named in this report, and a number of former Directors (including Mr Eduard Eshuys, Ms Barbara Gibson, Mr Richard Knight, Mr Hank Tuten, and Mr Mark Wheatley) and current and former executive officers of the Company and its controlled entities against all liabilities to persons (other than the Company or a related body corporate) which arise out of the performance of their normal duties as Director or executive officer, unless the liability relates to conduct involving bad faith. The Company also has a policy to indemnify the Directors and executive officers against all costs and expenses incurred in defending an action that falls within the scope of the indemnity and any resulting payments.
During the year the Company paid an insurance premium for Directors and Officers Liability and Statutory Liability policies. The contract of insurance prohibits disclosure of the amount of the premium and the nature of the liabilities insured under the policy.
During the year the Company also paid the premium on a Personal Accident insurance policy on behalf of Directors, to insure them for travel while on Company business.
Proceedings on behalf of the company
No person has applied to the Court under section 237 of the Corporations Act 2001 for leave to bring proceedings on behalf of the Company, or to intervene in any proceedings to which the Company is a party, for the purpose of taking responsibility on behalf of the Company for all or part of those proceedings.
No proceedings have been brought or intervened in on behalf of the Company with leave of the Court under section 237 of the Corporations Act 2001.
Environmental management
The Company regards compliance with environmental regulations as the minimum performance standard for its operations. The Company’s operations in Western Australia are subject to environmental regulation under both Commonwealth and State legislation.
Overall, there was a 55% reduction in the number of externally reportable environmental incidents during the year ended 30 June 2012 compared with the previous year. There were two non-compliances registered and externally reported for the Southern Cross operations during the year. At Leonora, there were eight non-compliances registered and externally reported, which was a significant decrease in the number of incidents reported in the previous year. The decrease in incidents reported was largely due to the work commenced during the year on capping of the old Tarmoola tailings dam, which reduced the number of wind generated dust incidents in the second half of the year. None of the reported incidents were material in that there was minimal, if any, adverse impact on the environment. No formal notices relating to any of the environmental incidents were issued by regulators.
Annual Report 2012 39
Directors’ Report cont.
Non-audit services
During the year the Company employed the auditor on assignments additional to their statutory audit duties. The Company engaged KPMG to perform financial due diligence as part of the Company’s processes for assessing the Allied Gold acquisition. Details of the amounts paid or payable to the auditor, KPMG, for non-audit services provided during the 2012 financial year are set out in Note 27 to the financial statements.
The Board of Directors has considered the position and, in accordance with the advice received from the Audit Committee, is satisfied that the provision of non-audit services during the year is compatible with the general standard of independence for auditors imposed by the Corporations Act 2001. The Directors are satisfied that the provision of non-audit services by the auditor, as set out in Note 27 to the financial statements, did not compromise the auditor independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 for the following reasons:
-
All non-audit services were reviewed by the Audit Committee to ensure they do not impact the impartiality and objectivity of the auditor;
-
None of the non-audit services performed in the 2012 financial year undermine the general principles relating to auditor independence as set out in APES 110 Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants ; and
-
The Audit Committee annually informs the Board of the detail, nature and amount of any non-audit services rendered by KPMG during the most recent financial year, giving an explanation of why the provision of these services is compatible with auditor independence. If applicable, the Audit Committee recommends that the Board take appropriate action in response to the Audit Committee’s report to satisfy itself of the independence of KPMG.
Auditor independence
A copy of the Auditor’s Independence Declaration required under section 307C of the Corporations Act 2001 is set out on page 41 and forms part of this Director’s Report. The Directors are satisfied that the provision of these services did not impair the auditor’s independence.
Events occurring after the end of the financial year
The Directors are not aware of any matter or circumstance that has arisen since the end of the financial year that, in their opinion, has significantly affected or may significantly affect in future years the Company’s operations, the results of those operations or the state of affairs, except for the following:
-
On 29 June 2012, the Company announced a proposal to acquire all the share of Allied Gold Mining Plc (“Allied Gold”) via a scheme of arrangement. Under the terms of the recommended offer, St Barbara will acquire the entire issued and to be issued ordinary share capital of Allied Gold for A$1.025 in cash and 0.8 St Barbara shares for each Allied Gold share (the “Offer”). Based on the closing price of St Barbara shares on the Australian Securities Exchange on 28 June 2012, being the last trading day before the announcement, the offer values Allied Gold at $556 million.
-
The cash consideration payable under the terms of the Offer will be funded from St Barbara’s existing cash resources and additionally by using a A$120 million term loan facility. Following implementation of the Offer, Allied Gold will become a wholly owned subsidiary of St Barbara.
-
On 14 August 2012, the shareholders of Allied Gold voted in favour of the scheme of arrangement. The court hearing in the UK to sanction the scheme is to be held on 30 August 2012. The effective date of the combination, subject to court approval, is expected to be by 7 September 2012.
Rounding of amounts
St Barbara Limited is a Company of the kind referred to in Class Order 98/100 approved by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission and issued pursuant to section 341(1) of the Corporations Act 2001. As a result, amounts in this Directors’ Report and the accompanying Financial Report have been rounded to the nearest thousand dollars, except where otherwise indicated.
This report is made in accordance with a resolution of Directors.
For and on behalf of the Board
Dated at Melbourne this 23rd day of August 2012
==> picture [80 x 75] intentionally omitted <==
Timothy J Lehany Managing Director and CEO
40
==> picture [35 x 709] intentionally omitted <==
Lead Auditor’s Independence Declaration under Section 307C of the Corporations Act 2001
To: the directors of St Barbara Limited
I declare that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, in relation to the audit for the financial year ended 30 June 2012 there have been:
- (i) no contraventions of the auditor independence requirements as set out in the Corporations Act 2001 in relation to the audit; and
(ii) no contraventions of any applicable code of professional conduct in relation to the audit.
KPMG
Tony Romeo Partner
Melbourne
23 August 2012
==> picture [476 x 214] intentionally omitted <==
Annual Report 2012 41
This financial report covers St Barbara Limited (the Group) consisting of St Barbara Limited and its subsidiaries. The financial report is presented in the Australian currency.
St Barbara Limited is a company limited by shares, incorporated and domiciled in Australia. Its registered office is:
St Barbara Limited
Level 10, 432 St Kilda Rd Melbourne VIC 3004
A description of the nature of the Group’s operations and its principal activities is included in the review of operations and activities in the directors’ report, which is not part of this financial report.
The financial report was authorised for issue by the Directors on 23 August 2012. The Company has the power to amend and reissue the financial report.
42
| Notes | Consolidated | Consolidated | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 2011 | ||
| $’000 | $’000 | ||
| Revenue from continuing operations | 6 | 541,189 | 359,575 |
| Mine operating costs | 9 | (268,877) | (208,021) |
| Gross profit | 272,312 | 151,554 | |
| Other revenue | 6 | 6,779 | 9,382 |
| Other income | 7 | 922 | 4,449 |
| Exploration expensed | (16,246) | (13,284) | |
| Corporate and support costs | (13,732) | (13,819) | |
| Royalties | (22,078) | (13,693) | |
| Depreciation and amortisation | 8, 9 | (97,223) | (58,480) |
| Expenses associated with acquisitions | 9 | (5,664) | (681) |
| Other expenditure | (6,417) | (6,230) | |
| Operating profit | 118,653 | 59,198 | |
| Finance costs | 8 | (3,754) | (4,040) |
| Net realised/unrealised (losses)/gains on derivatives | 9 | (5,400) | 13,471 |
| Profit before income tax | 109,499 | 68,629 | |
| Income tax benefit | 9, 10 | 20,731 | – |
| Profit after income tax for the year | 130,230 | 68,629 | |
| Earnings per share for profit attributable to the ordinary equity holders | |||
| of the Company: | |||
| Basic earnings per share (cents per share) | 36 | 40.04 | 21.05 |
| Diluted earnings per share (cents per share) | 36 | 39.60 | 20.94 |
The above Consolidated Income Statement should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
Annual Report 2012 43
| Notes | Consolidated | Consolidated | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 2011 | ||
| $’000 | $’000 | ||
| Profit for the year | 130,230 | 68,629 | |
| Other comprehensive income | |||
| Changes in fair value of available for sale financial assets | 25(a) | (96) | – |
| Changes in fair value of cash flow hedges taken to reserves | 25(a) | (2,790) | 17,102 |
| Income tax on other comprehensive income | 1,484 | – | |
| Other comprehensive (loss)/income net of tax(1) | (1,402) | 17,102 | |
| Total comprehensive profit attributable to equity holders of the company | 128,828 | 85,731 |
(1) Other comprehensive income comprises items of income and expense that are recognised directly in reserves or equity. These items are not recognised in the Income Statement in accordance with the requirements of the relevant accounting standards. Total comprehensive profit comprises the result for the year adjusted for the other comprehensive income.
The above Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
44
| Notes | Consolidated | Consolidated | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 2011 | ||
| $’000 | $’000 | ||
| Assets | |||
| Current assets | |||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 11 | 185,242 | 79,485 |
| Trade and other receivables | 12 | 13,795 | 24,140 |
| Inventories | 13 | 21,867 | 17,858 |
| Derivative financial assets | 22 | 87 | 2,085 |
| Available for sale financial assets | 15 | 154 | – |
| Deferred mining costs | 14 | 23,789 | 12,934 |
| Total current assets | 244,934 | 136,502 | |
| Non-current assets | |||
| Property, plant and equipment | 17 | 103,928 | 105,750 |
| Deferred mining costs | 14 | 5,917 | 10,230 |
| Mine properties | 18 | 289,647 | 283,991 |
| Exploration and evaluation | 19 | 15,474 | 11,629 |
| Derivative financial assets | 22 | – | 282 |
| Net deferred tax asset | 10 | 22,215 | – |
| Total non-current assets | 437,181 | 411,882 | |
| Total assets | 682,115 | 548,384 | |
| Liabilities | |||
| Current liabilities | |||
| Trade and other payables | 20 | 55,542 | 49,366 |
| Interest bearing borrowings | 21 | 3,043 | 10,491 |
| Derivative financial liabilities | 22 | 2,830 | – |
| Provisions | 23 | 10,824 | 7,982 |
| Total current liabilities | 72,239 | 67,839 | |
| Non-current liabilities | |||
| Interest bearing borrowings | 21 | 1,213 | 1,581 |
| Derivative financial liabilities | 22 | 13,547 | 10,468 |
| Provisions | 23 | 31,283 | 32,149 |
| Total non-current liabilities | 46,043 | 44,198 | |
| Total liabilities | 118,282 | 112,037 | |
| Net Assets | 563,833 | 436,347 | |
| Equity | |||
| Contributed equity | 24 | 613,275 | 615,521 |
| Reserves | 25(a) | (465) | 1,049 |
| Accumulated losses | 25(b) | (48,977) | (180,223) |
| Total equity | 563,833 | 436,347 |
The above Consolidated Statement of Financial Position should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
Annual Report 2012 45
| Share Based | Gold Cash | Investment | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contributed | Payments | Flow Hedge | Fair Value | Retained | |||
| Equity | Reserve | Reserve | Reserve | Earnings | Total | ||
| Note | $’000 | $’000 | $’000 | $’000 | $’000 | $’000 | |
| Balance at | |||||||
| 1 July 2011 | 615,521 | 3,108 | (2,059) | – | (180,223) | 436,347 | |
| Share buy back | 24 | (2,246) | – | – | – | – | (2,246) |
| Share-based payments | |||||||
| expense | 25(a) | – | 1,828 | – | – | – | 1,828 |
| Unlisted options not | |||||||
| vested | 25(a) | – | (924) | – | – | – | (924) |
| Unlisted options | |||||||
| expired | 25(a) | – | (1,016) | – | – | 1,016 | – |
| Comprehensive | |||||||
| income for the year | – | – | (1,335) | (67) | 130,230 | 128,828 | |
| Balance at | |||||||
| 30 June 2012 | 613,275 | 2,996 | (3,394) | (67) | (48,977) | 563,833 | |
| Share Based | |||||||
| Contributed | Payments | Gold Cash Flow | Investment Fair | Retained | |||
| Equity | Reserve | Hedge Reserve | Value Reserve | Earnings | Total | ||
| Note | $’000 | $’000 | $’000 | $’000 | $’000 | $’000 | |
| Balance at | |||||||
| 1 July 2010 | 614,997 | 2,484 | (19,161) | – | (248,852) | 349,468 | |
| Share-based payments | |||||||
| expense | 25(a) | – | 973 | – | – | – | 973 |
| Unlisted options | |||||||
| expired | 25(a) | – | (104) | – | – | – | (104) |
| Unlisted options | |||||||
| exercised | 24(b) | 524 | (245) | – | – | – | 279 |
| Comprehensive | |||||||
| income for the year | – | – | 17,102 | – | 68,629 | 85,731 | |
| Balance at | |||||||
| 30 June 2011 | 615,521 | 3,108 | (2,059) | – | (180,223) | 436,347 |
The above Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
46
| Notes | Consolidated | Consolidated | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | |||
| 2012 | $’000 | ||
| $’000 | Restated | ||
| Cash Flows From Operating Activities: | |||
| Receipts from customers (inclusive of GST) | 553,847 | 354,397 | |
| Payments to suppliers and employees (inclusive of GST) | (320,465) | (241,716)(1) | |
| Interest received | 5,555 | 5,122 | |
| Interest paid | (65) | (37) | |
| Payments for exploration | (16,246) | (13,284) | |
| Finance charges – finance leases | (278) | (962) | |
| Borrowing costs | (521) | (447) | |
| Net cash inflow from operating activities | 34 | 221,827 | 103,073 |
| Cash Flows From Investing Activities: | |||
| Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment | 68 | 3,016 | |
| Transaction costs on sale of property, plant and equipment | – | (45) | |
| Proceeds from sale of tenements | – | 2,000 | |
| Payments for available for sale financial assets | (250) | – | |
| Payments for property, plant and equipment | (19,457) | (12,207) | |
| Payments for development of mining properties | (80,757) | (106,283)(1) | |
| Exploration and evaluation expenditure – capitalised | (4,575) | (8,863) | |
| Net cash outflow from investing activities | (104,971) | (122,382) | |
| Cash Flows From Financing Activities: | |||
| Proceeds from issue of shares on conversion of options | – | 279 | |
| Proceeds from borrowings: – finance leases | 491 | 1,552 | |
| – insurance premium funding | 2,736 | 2,747 | |
| Buy back and redemption of convertible notes | – | (1,200) | |
| Payments for share buy backs | (2,239) | – | |
| Share buy back transaction costs | (7) | – | |
| Movement in restricted cash | – | 264 | |
| Movement in unclaimed monies | (665) | – | |
| Principal repayments – finance leases |
(1,011) | (982) | |
| – equipment financing facility | (7,860) | (5,061) | |
| – insurance premium funding | (2,544) | (962) | |
| Net cash outflow from financing activities | (11,099) | (3,363) | |
| Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 105,757 | (22,672) | |
| Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year | 79,485 | 102,157 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year | 11 | 185,242 | 79,485 |
(1) During the year, the Group reclassified expenditures relating to deferred mining from investing to operating cash flows. This classification better reflects the nature of this expenditure which is amortised to operating costs on a level by level basis.
The above Consolidated Cash Flow Statement should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
Annual Report 2012 47
Note 1 Summary of significant accounting policies
St Barbara Limited (the “Company”) is a company domiciled in Australia. The consolidated financial statements of the Company as at and for the year ended 30 June 2012 comprise the Company and its subsidiaries (together referred to as the “Group”), and the Group’s interest in associates and jointly controlled entities. The Group is a for-profit entity primarily involved in the exploration for, and mining of, gold.
The principal accounting policies adopted in the preparation of the financial report are set out below. These policies have been consistently applied to all the years presented, unless otherwise stated.
(A) BASIS OF PREPARATION
Statement of compliance
The financial report is a general purpose financial report, which has been prepared in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards (AASBs) (including Australian Interpretations) adopted by the Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB) and the Corporations Act 2001. Where required by accounting standards comparative figures have been adjusted to conform to changes in presentation in the current year. The consolidated financial report of the Group complies with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) and interpretations issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.
The financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors on 23 August 2012.
Basis of measurement
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the historical cost basis, except for the following material items:
-
Derivative financial instruments are measured at fair value
-
Share based payment arrangements are measured at fair value
-
Available for sale assets are measured at fair value
-
Rehabilitation provision is measured at net present value
-
Long service leave provision is measured at net present value
Critical accounting estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with AASB and IFRS requires management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amount of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates. The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimate is revised and in any future periods affected. The areas involving a higher degree of judgement or complexity, or areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the financial statements, are disclosed in Note 4.
(B) PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
(i) Subsidiaries
The consolidated financial statements incorporate the assets and liabilities of all subsidiaries of St Barbara Limited (‘‘Company’’ or ‘‘parent entity’’) as at 30 June 2012 and the results of all subsidiaries for the year then ended. St Barbara
Limited and its subsidiaries together are referred to in this financial report as the Group.
Subsidiaries are all those entities (including special purpose entities) over which the Group has the power to govern the financial and operating policies so as to obtain benefits from its activities, generally accompanying a shareholding of more than one-half of the voting rights. The existence and effect of potential voting rights that are currently exercisable or convertible are considered when assessing whether the Group controls another entity.
Subsidiaries are consolidated from the date on which control commences until the date control ceases.
Intercompany transactions, balances and unrealised gains on transactions between Group companies are eliminated. Unrealised losses are also eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of the impairment of the asset transferred. Accounting policies of subsidiaries have been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the policies adopted by the Group.
Investments in subsidiaries are accounted for at cost within the Parent Entity disclosures at Note 26.
(ii) Associates and jointly controlled entities
Associates are all entities over which the Group has significant influence but not control, generally accompanying a shareholding of between 20% and 50% of voting rights. An interest in an associate and a jointly controlled entity is accounted for in the consolidated financial statements using the equity method and is carried at cost by the parent entity.
Profits or losses on transactions establishing the joint venture entity and transactions with the joint venture are eliminated to the extent of the Group’s ownership interest, until such time as they are realised by the joint venture entity on consumption or sale, unless they relate to an unrealised loss that provides evidence of the impairment of an asset transferred.
(iii) Jointly controlled operations and assets
Details of unincorporated joint ventures and jointly controlled assets are set out in Note 32.
Where material, the proportionate interests in the assets, liabilities and expenses of a joint venture activity are incorporated in the financial statements under the appropriate headings.
(C) SEGMENT REPORTING
A reportable segment is a component of the Group that engages in business activities from which it may earn revenues or incur expenses, including revenues and expenses that relate to transactions with any of the Group’s other components. The operating results of all reportable segments are regularly reviewed by the Group’s Executive Leadership Team (“ELT”) to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment and assess its performance, and for which financial information is available.
Segment results that are reported to the ELT include items directly attributable to a segment and those that can be allocated on a reasonable basis. Unallocated items comprise mainly corporate assets and related depreciation, and corporate expenses.
Segment capital expenditure represents the total cost incurred during the year for mine development and acquisitions of property, plant and equipment.
48
Note 1 Summary of significant accounting policies cont.
(D) FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION
(i) Functional and presentation currency
The consolidated financial statements are presented in Australian dollars, which is also St Barbara Limited’s functional currency.
(ii) Transactions and balances
Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions, and from the translation at year end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies, are recognised in the income statement, except when deferred in equity as qualifying cash flow hedges and qualifying net investment hedges.
Translation differences on non monetary financial assets and liabilities are reported as part of the fair value gain or loss. Translation differences on non monetary financial assets and liabilities, such as equities held at fair value through profit or loss, are recognised in the income statement as part of the fair value gain or loss. Translation differences on non monetary financial assets, such as equities classified as available for sale financial assets, are included in the fair value reserve in equity.
(E) REVENUE RECOGNITION
Revenue from the sale of goods in the course of ordinary activities is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable. Amounts disclosed as revenue are net of amounts collected on behalf of third parties. The Group recognises revenue when the significant risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred to the buyer, the amount of revenue can be reliably measured and the associated costs can be estimated reliably, and it is probable that future economic benefits will flow to the Group.
Revenue is recognised for the major business activities as follows:
(i) Product sales
Amounts are recognised as sales revenue when there has been a transfer of risk and rewards to a customer and selling prices are known or can be reasonably estimated.
Gains and losses, including premiums paid or received, in respect of forward sales, options and other deferred delivery arrangements, which hedge anticipated revenues from future production, are deferred and included in sales revenue when the hedged proceeds are received.
(ii) Interest income
Interest income is recognised on a time proportion basis using the effective interest method.
(iii) Dividends
Dividends are recognised as revenue when the right to receive payment is established
(iv) Gains on disposal of available-for-sale financial assets and property, plant and equipment
Revenue is recognised when the risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred, which is usually considered to occur on settlement.
(v) Third party toll treatment revenue
Toll treatment revenue represents revenue earned for processing third party ore through the Group’s processing facilities. Revenue is recognised when the third party’s product is in a form suitable for delivery, and no further processing is required by the Group, and there has been a transfer of risk to the third party.
(F) EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION/MINE PROPERTIES
(i) Exploration, evaluation and feasibility expenditure
All exploration and evaluation expenditure incurred up to establishment of reserves is expensed as incurred. From the point in time when reserves are established, exploration and evaluation expenditure is capitalised and carried forward in the financial statements, in respect of areas of interest for which the rights of tenure are current and where such costs are expected to be recouped through successful development and exploitation of the area of interest, or alternatively, by its sale.
Exploration and evaluation expenditure consists of an accumulation of acquisition costs and direct exploration and evaluation costs incurred, together with an allocation of directly related overhead expenditure.
Feasibility expenditure represents costs related to the preparation and completion of a feasibility study to enable a development decision to be made in relation to that area of interest. Feasibility expenditures are expensed as incurred until a decision has been made to develop the area of interest.
Exploration and evaluation assets are assessed for impairment if (i) sufficient data exists to determine technical feasibility and commercial viability, and (ii) facts and circumstances suggest that the carrying amount exceeds the recoverable amount (see impairment policy, Note 1(j)). For the purpose of impairment testing, exploration and evaluation assets are allocated to cash-generating units to which the exploration activity relates.
When an area of interest is abandoned, or the Directors determine it is not commercial, accumulated costs in respect of that area are written off in the period the decision is made.
(ii) Mines under construction
Mine development expenditure is accumulated separately for each area of interest in which economically recoverable reserves have been identified. This expenditure includes direct costs of construction, an appropriate allocation of overheads and borrowing costs capitalised during construction. Once a development decision has been taken, all capitalised exploration, evaluation and feasibility expenditure in respect of the area of interest is aggregated with the costs of construction and classified under non-current assets as mine development.
(iii) Mine development
Mine development expenditure represents the acquisition cost and/or accumulated exploration, evaluation and development expenditure in respect of areas of interest in which mining has commenced.
When further development expenditure is incurred in respect of a mine, after the commencement of production, such expenditure is carried forward as part of the mine development only when substantial future economic benefits are thereby established, otherwise such expenditure is classified as part of production and expensed as incurred.
Annual Report 2012 49
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements cont.
Note 1 Summary of significant accounting policies cont.
(F) EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION/MINE PROPERTIES cont
(iii) Mine development cont
Mine development costs are deferred until commercial production commences, at which time they are amortised on a unit-of-production basis over mineable reserves. The calculation of amortisation takes into account future costs which will be incurred to develop all the mineable reserves. Changes to mineable reserves are applied from the beginning of the reporting period and the amortisation charge is adjusted prospectively from the beginning of the period.
(G) DEFERRED MINING EXPENDITURE
Certain mining costs, principally those that relate to the stripping of waste and operating development in underground operations, which provide access so that future economically recoverable ore can be mined, are deferred in the statement of financial position as deferred mining costs.
(i) Underground operations
In underground operations mining occurs progressively on a level-by-level basis. In these operations an estimate is made of the life of level average underground mining cost per recoverable ounce to expense underground costs in the income statement. Underground mining costs in the period are deferred based on the metres developed for a particular level. Previously deferred underground mining costs are released to the income statement based on the recoverable ounces produced in a level multiplied by the life of level cost per recoverable ounce rate.
Grade control drilling is deferred to the statement of financial position on a level-by-level basis. These amounts are released to the income statement as ounces are produced from the related mining levels.
(ii) Open pit operations
The amount of mining costs deferred is based on the ratio obtained by dividing the waste tonnes mined by the quantity of gold ounces contained in the ore. Mining costs incurred in the period are deferred to the extent that the current period waste to contained gold ounce ratio exceeds the life of mine waste to ore ratio.
Deferred mining costs are then charged against reported earnings to the extent that, in subsequent periods, the ratio falls below the life of mine ratio. The life of mine ratio is based on economically recoverable reserves of the operation.
The life of mine ratio is a function of an individual mine’s design and therefore changes to that design will generally result in changes to the ratio. Changes in other technical or economic parameters may impact reserves, which will then impact the life of mine ratio. Changes to the life of mine ratio are accounted for prospectively.
In the production stage of some operations further development of the mine requires a phase of unusually high overburden removal activity that is similar in nature to pre-production mine development. The costs of such unusually high overburden removal are deferred and charged against earnings in subsequent periods on a unit-of-production basis.
(H) TAXES
(i) Income tax
Income tax expense comprises current and deferred tax. Current tax and deferred tax is recognised in the income statement except to the extent that it relates to a business combination, or items recognised directly in equity or in other comprehensive income.
Current tax is the expected tax payable or receivable on the taxable profit or loss for the year, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date, and any adjustment to tax payable in respect of previous years. Current tax payable also includes any tax liability arising from the declaration of dividends.
Deferred tax is recognised in respect of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for taxation purposes. Deferred tax is not recognised for:
-
Temporary differences on the initial recognition of assets or liabilities in a transaction that is not a business combination and that affects neither accounting nor taxable profit or loss;
-
Temporary differences related to investments in subsidiaries and jointly controlled entities to the extent that it is probable that they will not reverse in the foreseeable future;
-
Taxable temporary differences arising on the initial recognition of goodwill.
Deferred tax is measured at the tax rates that are expected to be applied to temporary differences when they reverse, based on the laws that have been enacted of substantively enacted by the reporting date.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset if there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax liabilities and assets, and they relate to income taxes levied by the same tax authority on the same taxable entity, or on different tax entities, but they intend to settle current tax liabilities and assets on a net basis or their tax assets and liabilities will be realised simultaneously.
A deferred tax asset is recognised for unused tax losses, tax credits and deductible temporary differences, to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which they can be utilised. Deferred tax assets are reviewed at each reporting date and are reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that the related tax benefit will be realised.
Additional income tax expenses that arise from the distribution of cash dividends are recognised at the same time that the liability to pay the related dividend is recognised. The Group does not distribute non-cash assets as dividends to its shareholders.
50
Note 1 Summary of significant accounting policies cont.
(H) TAXES cont.
(ii) Goods and Services Tax (GST)
Revenues, expenses and assets are recognised net of the amount of associated GST, unless the GST incurred is not recoverable from the taxation authority. In this case it is recognised as part of the cost of acquisition of the asset or as part of the expense.
Receivables and payables are stated inclusive of the amount of GST receivable or payable. The net amount of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority is included with other receivables or payables in the balance sheet.
Cash flows are included in the statement of cash flows on a gross basis. The GST component of cash flows arising from investing or financing activities, which are recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority are classified as part of operating cash flows.
(I) LEASES
Leases of property, plant and equipment, where the Group has substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership, are classified as finance leases. Finance leases are capitalised at inception of the lease at the lower of the fair value of the leased property and the present value of the minimum future lease payments. The corresponding rental obligations, net of finance charges, are included in other long term payables. Each lease payment is allocated between the liability and finance charges so as to achieve a constant rate on the finance balance outstanding. The interest element of the finance cost is charged to the income statement over the lease period so as to produce a constant periodic rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability for each period. The property, plant and equipment acquired under finance leases are depreciated over the shorter of the asset’s useful life and the lease term.
Leases in which a significant portion of the risks and rewards of ownership are retained by the lessor are classified as operating leases. Payments made under operating leases (net of any incentives received from the lessor) are charged to the income statement on a straight-line basis over the period of the lease.
(J) IMPAIRMENT OF ASSETS
All asset values are reviewed at each reporting date to determine whether there have been any events or changes in circumstances that indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Where an indicator of impairment exists, a formal estimate of the recoverable amount is made. The recoverable amount is the higher of an asset’s fair value less costs to sell and value in use. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate which reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset. For the purposes of assessing impairment, assets are grouped at the lowest levels for which there are separately identifiable cash inflows, largely independent of the cash inflows from other assets or groups of assets (cash-generating units).
(K) CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
For cash flow statement presentation purposes, cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, deposits held at call with financial institutions, other short term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and which are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value, and bank overdrafts. Bank overdrafts are shown within borrowings in current liabilities on the balance sheet.
(L) TRADE RECEIVABLES
Trade receivables are recognised initially at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost, less provision for doubtful debts. Trade receivables are usually due for settlement no more than 30 days from the date of recognition. Cash placed on deposit with a financial institution to secure bank guarantee facilities and restricted from use within the business is disclosed as trade and other receivables.
Collectability of trade receivables is reviewed on an ongoing basis. Debts which are known to be uncollectable are written off. A provision for doubtful receivables is established when there is objective evidence that the Group will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the original terms of receivables. The amount of the provision is the difference between the asset’s carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows, discounted at the effective interest rate. The amount of the provision is recognised in the income statement.
(M) INVENTORIES
Raw materials and stores, ore stockpiles, work-in-progress and finished gold stocks are valued at the lower of cost and net realisable value.
Cost comprises direct materials, direct labour and an appropriate proportion of variable and fixed overhead expenditure relating to mining activities, the latter being allocated on the basis of normal operating capacity. Costs are assigned to individual items of inventory on the basis of weighted average costs. Net realisable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less the estimated costs of completion and the estimated costs necessary to make the sale.
(N) INVESTMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL ASSETS
The Group classifies its investments and other financial assets in the following categories: financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, loans and receivables, and available-for-sale financial assets. The classification depends on the purpose for which the investments were acquired. Management determines the classification of its investments at initial recognition and re-evaluates this designation at each reporting date.
Investments and other financial assets are recognised initially at fair value plus, for assets not at fair value through profit and loss, any directly attributable transaction costs, except as described below. Subsequent to initial recognition, investments and other financial assets are measured as described below.
An impairment loss is recognised for the amount by which the carrying amount of an asset or a cash generating unit exceeds the recoverable amount. Impairment losses are recognised in the income statement.
Annual Report 2012 51
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements cont.
Note 1 Summary of significant accounting policies cont.
(N) INVESTMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL ASSETS cont
(i) Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are financial assets held for trading, which were acquired principally for the purpose of selling in the short term with the intention of making a profit. Derivatives are also categorised as held for trading, unless they are designated as hedges. Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are measured at fair value and changes therein are recognised in the income statement. Attributable transaction costs are recognised in the income statement when incurred.
(ii) Available-for-sale financial assets
Available for sale financial assets, comprising principally marketable equity securities, are non derivative financial assets that are either designated in this category or not classified in any of the other categories. They are included in non current assets, unless management intends to and can dispose of the investment within 12 months of the balance sheet date.
Subsequent to initial recognition, available-for-sale financial assets are measured at fair value and changes therein, other than impairment losses, are recognised as a separate component of equity net of attributable tax. When an asset is de-recognised the cumulative gain or loss in equity is transferred to the income statement.
(O) DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Derivative financial instruments may be held to protect against the Group’s Australian dollar gold price risk exposures. Derivatives are initially recognised at fair value on the date a derivative contract is entered into and are subsequently remeasured to fair value at each reporting date. The accounting for subsequent changes in fair value depends on whether the derivative is designated as a hedging instrument, and if so, the nature of the item being hedged. The Group designates certain derivatives as either (1) hedges of the fair value of recognised assets or liabilities or a firm commitment (fair value hedge); or (2) hedges of the cash flows of recognised assets and liabilities and highly probable forecast transactions (cash flow hedges).
The Group documents at the inception of the hedging transaction the relationship between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. The Group also documents its assessment, both at hedge inception and on an ongoing basis, of whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions have been, and will continue to be, highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of hedged items.
The fair values of various derivative financial instruments used for hedging purposes are disclosed in Note 22. Movements in the gold cash flow hedge reserve in shareholders’ equity are shown in Note 25.
(i) Cash flow hedge
The fair value of gold option contracts comprises intrinsic value, that is, the extent to which the components of an option collar are in the money due to a gold forward price falling below or rising above the option strike prices, and time value.
The effective portion of changes in the intrinsic value of derivatives that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges is recognised in equity in the gold cash flow hedge reserve. The gain or loss relating to the ineffective portion and time value is recognised immediately in the income statement.
Amounts accumulated in equity are recycled through the income statement in the periods when the hedged item affects profit or loss (for instance, when the forecast gold sale that is hedged takes place). The gain or loss relating to the effective portion of the financial instrument hedging Australian dollar gold sales is recognised in the income statement within ‘net realised gains on derivatives’.
When a hedging instrument expires or is sold or terminated, or when a hedge no longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting, any cumulative gain or loss existing in equity at that time remains in equity and is recognised when the forecast transaction is ultimately recognised in the income statement. When a forecast transaction is no longer expected to occur, the cumulative gain or loss that was reported in equity is immediately transferred to the income statement.
(ii) Derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting
Certain derivative instruments do not qualify for hedge accounting. Changes in the fair value of any derivative instrument that does not qualify for hedge accounting are recognised immediately in the income statement.
(P) FAIR VALUE ESTIMATION
The fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities must be estimated for recognition and measurement, or for disclosure purposes.
The fair value of financial instruments traded in active markets (such as publicly traded derivatives, and trading and available for sale securities) is based on quoted market prices at the balance sheet date. The quoted market price used for financial assets held by the Group is the current bid price; the appropriate quoted market price for financial liabilities is the current ask price.
The fair value of financial instruments that are not traded in an active market (for example, over the counter derivatives) is determined using generally accepted valuation techniques. The Group uses a variety of methods and makes assumptions that are based on market conditions existing at each balance date.
The nominal value less estimated credit adjustments of trade receivables and payables are assumed to approximate their fair values. The fair value of financial liabilities for disclosure purposes is estimated by discounting the future contractual cash flows at the current market interest rate that is available to the Group for similar financial instruments.
52
Note 1 Summary of significant accounting policies cont.
(Q) PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Buildings, plant and equipment are stated at historical cost less accumulated depreciation. Historical cost includes expenditure that is directly attributable to the acquisition of the items. Cost may also include transfers from equity of any gains/losses on qualifying cash flow hedges of foreign currency purchases of property, plant and equipment.
Subsequent costs are included in the asset’s carrying amount or recognised as a separate asset, as appropriate, only when it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the Group and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. All other repairs and maintenance are charged to the income statement during the financial period in which they are incurred.
Depreciation of assets is calculated using the straight line method to allocate the cost or revalued amounts, net of residual values, over their estimated useful lives, as follows:
| – Buildings | 10 – 15 years |
|---|---|
| – Plant and equipment | 3 – 10 years |
| – Fixtures and fittings | 10 – 15 years |
Where the carrying value of an asset is less than its estimated residual value, no depreciation is charged. The assets’ residual values and useful lives are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at each balance sheet date.
An asset’s carrying amount is written down immediately to its recoverable amount, if the asset’s carrying amount is greater than its estimated recoverable amount (Note 1(j)).
Gains and losses on disposal are determined by comparing proceeds with carrying amount. These gains and losses are included in the income statement when realised.
(R) TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES
These amounts represent liabilities for goods and services provided to the Group prior to the end of the financial year, which remains unpaid as at reporting date. The amounts are unsecured and are usually paid within 30 days from the end of the month of recognition.
(S) BORROWINGS
Borrowings are initially recognised at fair value, net of transaction costs incurred. Borrowings are subsequently measured at amortised cost. Any difference between the proceeds (net of transaction costs) and the redemption amount is recognised in the income statement over the period of the borrowings using the effective interest method. Fees paid on the establishment of loan facilities, which are not incremental costs relating to the actual draw down of the facility, are recognised as prepayments and amortised on a straight line basis over the term of the facility.
The fair value of the liability portion of convertible debt is determined using a market interest rate for an equivalent non-convertible debt. This amount is recorded as a liability on an amortised cost basis until extinguished on conversion or maturity of the debt. The remainder of the proceeds is allocated to the conversion option. This is recognised and included in shareholders’ equity, net of income tax effects.
Borrowings are classified as current liabilities unless the Group has an unconditional right to defer settlement of the liability for at least 12 months after the reporting date.
(T) BORROWING COSTS
Borrowing costs incurred for the construction of any qualifying asset are capitalised during the period of time it is required to complete and prepare the asset for its intended use or sale. Other borrowing costs are recognised as expenses in the period in which they are incurred.
(U) PROVISIONS
Provisions, including those for legal claims and rehabilitation and restoration costs, are recognised when the Group has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of past events, it is more likely than not that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation, and the amount has been reliably estimated. Provisions are not recognised for future operating losses.
Where there are a number of similar obligations, the likelihood that an outflow will be required in settlement is determined by considering the class of obligations as a whole. A provision is recognised even if the likelihood of an outflow with respect to any one item included in the same class of obligations may be small.
A provision for restructuring is recognised when the Group has approved a detailed and formal restructuring plan, and the restructuring has commenced or has been announced publicly. Future operating costs are not provided for.
Provisions are measured at the present value of management’s best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the present obligation at the balance sheet date. The discount rate used to determine the present value reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the liability. The increase in the provision due to the passage of time is recognised as interest expense.
(V) EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
(i) Wages and salaries, and annual leave
Liabilities for wages and salaries, including non-monetary benefits and annual leave expected to be paid within 12 months of the reporting date are recognised in other payables in respect of employees’ services up to the reporting date and are measured at the amounts expected to be paid, including expected on-costs, when the liabilities are settled.
(ii) Long service leave
The liability for long service leave is recognised in the provision for employee benefits and measured as the present value of expected future payments to be made, plus expected on-costs, in respect of services provided by employees up to the reporting date. Consideration is given to the expected future wage and salary levels, experience of employee departures and periods of service. Expected future payments are discounted with reference to market yields on national government bonds with terms to maturity and currency that match, as closely as possible, the estimated future cash outflows.
Annual Report 2012 53
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements cont.
Note 1 Summary of significant accounting policies cont.
(V) EMPLOYEE BENEFITS cont
(iii) Share-based payments
Share-based compensation benefits are provided to employees via the St Barbara Limited Employees’ Option Plan and the Performance Rights Plan. Information relating to these schemes is set out in Note 37.
The fair value of options granted under the St Barbara Limited Employees’ Option Plan or rights granted under the Performance Rights Plan is recognised as an employee benefit expense with a corresponding increase in equity. The fair value is measured at grant date and recognised over the period during which the employees become unconditionally entitled to the options or rights. The amount recognised is adjusted to reflect the actual number of share options not expected to vest, based on expectations of performance related conditions. Adjustments to the amount recognised at each reporting date are taken through the Income Statement.
The fair value at grant date is independently determined using a Black-Scholes option pricing model that takes into account the exercise price, the term of the option, the vesting and performance criteria, the impact of dilution, the non-tradeable nature of the option, the share price at grant date and expected price volatility of the underlying share, the expected dividend yield and the risk-free interest rate for the term of the option.
Upon the exercise of options or rights, the balance of the share-based payments reserve relating to those options is transferred to share capital.
(iv) Retirement benefit obligations
Contributions to defined contribution funds are recognised as an expense as they are due and become payable. Prepaid contributions are recognised as an asset to the extent that a cash refund or a reduction in future payments is available.
The Group has no obligations in respect of defined benefit funds.
(v) Executive incentives
Senior executives may be eligible for Short Term Incentive payments (“STI”) subject to achievement of Key Performance Indicators, as recommended by the Remuneration Committee and approved by the Board of Directors. The Group recognises a liability and an expense for STIs in the reporting period during which the service is provided by the employee.
(vi) Termination benefits
Termination benefits are recognised as an expense when the Group is demonstrably committed, without realistic possibility of withdrawal, to a formal detailed plan to terminate employment.
(W) CONTRIBUTED EQUITY
Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of ordinary shares and share options are recognised as a deduction from equity, net of any tax effects.
If the entity reacquires its own equity instruments, e.g. as the result of a share buy-back, those instruments are deducted from equity and the associated shares are cancelled. No gain or loss is recognised in the income statement and the consideration paid, including any directly attributable incremental costs, is recognised directly in equity.
(X) EARNINGS PER SHARE
(i) Basic earnings per share
Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing the profit attributable to equity holders of the Company, excluding any costs of servicing equity other than ordinary shares, by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the reporting period, adjusted for bonus elements in ordinary shares issued during the reporting period.
(ii) Diluted earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share adjusts the figures used in the determination of basic earnings per share to take into account the after income tax effect of interest and other financing costs associated with dilutive potential ordinary shares and the weighted average number of shares assumed to have been issued for no consideration in relation to dilutive potential ordinary shares.
(Y) REHABILITATION AND MINE CLOSURE
The Group has obligations to dismantle, remove, restore and rehabilitate certain items of property, plant and equipment and areas of disturbance during mining operations.
Under AASB 116 Property, Plant and Equipment , the cost of an asset must include any estimated costs of dismantling and removing the asset and restoring the site on which it is located. The capitalised rehabilitation and mine closure costs are depreciated (along with the other costs included in the asset) over the asset’s useful life.
AASB 137 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets requires a provision to be made for the estimated cost of rehabilitation and restoration of areas disturbed during mining operations up to reporting date but not yet rehabilitated. Management judgments and estimates in relation to the rehabilitation provision are provided at Note 4(v). Provision has been made in full for all the disturbed areas at the reporting date based on current estimates of costs to rehabilitate such areas, discounted to their present value based on expected future cash flows. The estimated cost of rehabilitation includes the current cost of contouring, topsoiling and re-vegetation to meet legislative requirements. Changes in estimates are dealt with on a prospective basis as they arise.
54
Note 1 Summary of significant accounting policies cont.
(Y) REHABILITATION AND MINE CLOSURE cont
There is some uncertainty as to the amount of rehabilitation obligations that will be incurred due to the impact of changes in environmental legislation and many other factors, including future developments, changes in technology and price increases.
At each reporting date the rehabilitation liability is remeasured in line with changes in the timing and/or amounts of the costs to be incurred and discount rates. The liability is adjusted for changes in estimates. Adjustments to the estimated amount and timing of future rehabilitation and restoration cash flows are a normal occurrence in light of the significant judgments and estimates involved.
As the value of the provision represents the discounted value of the present obligation to restore, dismantle and rehabilitate, the increase in the provision due to the passage of time is recognised as a borrowing cost.
(Z) ROUNDING OF AMOUNTS
The Company is of a kind referred to in Class Order 98/0100, issued by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission, relating to the “rounding off” of amounts in the financial report. Amounts in the financial report have been rounded off in accordance with that Class Order to the nearest thousand dollars, or in certain cases, the nearest dollar.
Note 3 Financial risk management
This note presents information about each of the financial risks that the Group is exposed to, the policies and processes for measuring and managing financial risk, and the management of capital. Further quantitative disclosures are included throughout this financial report.
The Group’s activities expose it to a variety of financial risk, being: market risk (especially gold price and exchange rate risk), credit risk, liquidity risk and cash flow interest rate risk. The Group’s overall risk management program focuses on the unpredictability of commodity markets and seeks to minimise potential adverse effects on the financial performance of the Group. The Group may use derivative instruments as appropriate to manage certain risk exposures.
Risk management in relation to financial risk is carried out by a centralised treasury function in accordance with policies approved by the Board of Directors.
(A) MARKET RISK
Market risk is the risk that changes in market prices, such as commodity prices, foreign exchange rates, interest rates and equity prices will affect the Group’s income or the value of its holdings of financial instruments, cash flows and financial position. The Group may enter into derivatives, and also incur financial liabilities, in order to manage market risks. All such transactions are carried out within guidelines set by the Board.
(i) Commodity price risk
(AA) NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS AND INTERPRETATIONS
NOT YET ADOPTED
A number of new standards, amendments to standards and interpretations are available for early adoption for annual periods beginning after 1 July 2011, and have not been applied in preparing these consolidated financial statements. None of these are expected to have a significant effect on the consolidated financial statements of the Group.
Note 2 New Standards adopted
The Company has adopted the following new and/or revised Standards, Amendments and Interpretations from 1 July 2011:
-
AASB 2010-4: Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards – Annual Improvements Project (2010)
-
AASB 2011-1: Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from the Trans-Tasman Convergence Project
-
AASB 1054: Australian Additional Disclosures
-
AASB 124: Related Party Disclosures
-
AASB 2010-6: Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards – Disclosures on Transfers of Financial Assets
Adoption of the above Standards, Amendments and Interpretations did not have any effect on the financial position or performance of the Group.
The Group is exposed to Australian dollar gold price risk. This risk arises through the sale of gold.
The Group is managing commodity price risk in relation to the King of the Hills and Southern Cross operations by using a combination of gold put options and gold call options to create zero-cost option collar structures as described in (b) below.
(ii) Currency risk
The Group is exposed to currency risk on gold sales where the Australian dollar spot gold price is quoted as a function of US dollars and the prevailing exchange rate. The Group may from time to time use Australian dollar derivatives to manage the risks associated with the gold price and currency rates.
The Group’s main interest rate risk arises from long-term borrowings. Borrowings issued at variable rates expose the Group to cash flow interest rate risk. Borrowings issued at fixed rates expose the Group to fair value interest rate risk. The Group’s interest rate policy does not require a fixed and pre-determined proportion of its interest rate exposure to be hedged. Any decision to hedge interest rate risk will be assessed at the inception of each floating rate debt facility in relation to the overall Group exposure, the prevailing interest rate market, and any funding counterparty requirements.
Annual Report 2012 55
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements cont.
Note 3 Financial risk management cont.
(B) CASH FLOW HEDGES
The Group may from time to time be party to derivative financial instruments in the normal course of business to protect future revenue from gold operations from a significant fall in the Australian dollar price of gold, in accordance with the Group’s financial risk management policies.
(i) King of the Hills
During June 2010, the Company entered into a zero cost collar hedging facility for 250,000 ounces of gold over a five year period to manage Australian dollar gold price risk associated with the estimated production from the King of the Hills mine. The facility was fully drawn down by purchasing put options and selling call options over 250,000 ounces of gold (collar structure) with the following strikes:
-
Bought put options at A$1,425/oz
-
Sold call options at A$1,615/oz
During financial year 2012, 30,000 ounces of call options and 4,000 ounces of put options were exercised (2011: Call options – Nil exercised; Put options – 12,000 ounces exercised). 33,000 ounces of call options and 59,000 ounces of put options expired.
(ii) Southern Cross
In September 2011, the Company entered into a zero cost collar hedging facility for 100,000 ounces of gold over a twelve month period to manage Australian dollar gold price risk associated with the estimated production from the Southern Cross mine. The facility was fully drawn down by purchasing put options and selling call options over 100,000 ounces of gold (collar structure) with the following strikes:
-
Bought put options at A$1,550/oz
-
Sold call options at A$1,610/oz
During financial year 2012, 48,000 ounces of call options were exercised (2011: Nil). 80,000 ounces of put options and 32,000 ounces of call options expired.
The maturity profile of the put and call option contracts remaining as at 30 June 2012 is provided in the table below.
| 6 months | 6 – 12 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| or less | months | 1 – 2 years | 2 – 5 years | ||
| Strike Price | Total ounces | ounces | ounces | ounces | ounces |
| King of the Hills | |||||
| Put: A$1,425/oz | 175,000 | 31,750 | 32,502 | 75,999 | 34,749 |
| Call: A$1,615/oz | 175,000 | 31,750 | 32,502 | 75,999 | 34,749 |
| Southern Cross | |||||
| Put: A$1,550/oz | 20,000 | 20,000 | – | – | – |
| Call: A$1,610/oz | 20,000 | 20,000 | – | – | – |
At the date of entering into each of the collar structures, the net fair value of the put and call options was zero dollars. At 30 June 2012, the fair value of all remaining put and call option contracts was negative $16,290,000 (June 2011: negative $8,101,000). $11,442,000 (June 2011: $6,042,000) of this negative fair value represents an unrealised loss related to time value of the 195,000 ounces outstanding at 30 June 2012 (June 2011: 238,000 ounces). A loss of $5,400,000 for the year ended 30 June 2012 was recognised in the income statement (2011: gain of $13,471,000). Included in this loss was a net realised gain of $702,000 (2011: gain of $525,000) which represented the unwinding of the unrealised mark-to-market loss previously recognised for options that were exercised or expired during the year (refer to note 1(o)). Unrealised losses of $3,054,000 relating to the intrinsic value of the options was recognised in the gold cash flow hedge reserve in equity during the year (2011: gains of $17,102,000), with a realised gain of $264,000 recognised in the reserve for options that were exercised or expired during the year.
The relationship between currencies, spot gold price and volatilities is complex and changes in the spot gold price can influence volatility, and vice versa.
56
Note 3 Financial risk management cont.
(B) CASH FLOW HEDGES cont.
The following table summarises the impact of a A$100 change in the Australian dollar gold price (all other variables held constant) on the valuation of the gold option fair values.
| on the valuation of the gold option fair values. | on the valuation of the gold option fair values. | |
|---|---|---|
| Gold Price Sensitivity Impact on post-tax result(1) |
Impact on gold cash flow hedge reserve net of tax(2) |
|
| 2012 $’000 |
2011 $’000 |
2012 $’000 2011 $’000 |
| +A$100 change in AUD spot price 2,018 –A$100 change in AUD spot price 5,060 |
(9,074) 9,074 |
(11,532) (8,966) 4,453 8,966 |
(1) Represents the movement in time value (a positive movement represents a gain).
(2) Represents the movement in intrinsic value (a positive movement represents a gain).
(C) CREDIT RISK
Credit risk is the risk that a counterparty will not meet its obligations under a financial instrument or customer contract. The Group is exposed to credit risk from its operating activities (primarily customer receivables) and from its financing activities, including deposits with banks and financial institutions and derivatives.
The maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting date is the carrying amount of the financial assets, other than available for sale assets.
Credit risks related to receivables
The Group’s most significant customer accounts for $3,599,000 of the trade receivables carrying amount at 30 June 2012 (2011: $13,770,000), representing receivables owing from gold sales. Settlement of the receivables relating to gold sales occurred on 3 July 2012. Based on historic rates of default, the Group believes that no impairment has occurred with respect to trade receivables, and none of the trade receivables at 30 June 2012 were past due.
Credit risks related to cash deposits and derivatives
Credit risk from balances with banks and financial institutions derivative counterparties is managed by the centralised Treasury function in accordance with Board approved policy. Investments of surplus funds are only made with approved counterparties (minimum Standard & Poor’s credit rating of “AA-”) and there is a financial limit on funds placed with any single counterparty.
Derivative transactions are only made with approved counterparties (minimum Standard & Poor’s credit rating of “AA-“), and more than one counterparty is used when tranches of derivatives are entered into. Derivatives transactions cover only a small proportion of total Group production with maturities occurring over a period of time (refer Note 3(b)).
(D) CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
The Group’s total capital is defined as total shareholders’ funds plus net debt.
| The Group’s total capital is defined as total shareholders’ funds plus | net debt. | |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 2011 | |
| Consolidated capital | $’000 | $’000 |
| Total shareholders’ funds | 563,833 | 436,347 |
| Borrowings | 4,256 | 12,072 |
| Cash and cash equivalents(1) | (4,256) | (12,072) |
| Total capital | 563,833 | 436,347 |
(1) Cash and cash equivalents are included to the extent that the net debt position is nil.
The Group does not have a target debt/equity ratio. There were no changes in the Group’s approach to capital management during the year.
The Group is not subject to externally imposed capital requirements other than normal banking requirements.
Cash and cash equivalents does not include cash held on deposit with a financial institution as security for a bank guarantee facility totalling $123,000 (2011: $123,000) at the reporting date.
Annual Report 2012 57
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements cont.
Note 3 Financial risk management cont.
(D) CAPITAL MANAGEMENT cont
The Company has a $25,000,000 performance bond facility with the National Australia Bank Limited (NAB) to provide security for performance obligations incurred in the ordinary course of business. The NAB facility does not require cash backing. Security is provided in the form of a fixed and floating charge over the Company’s assets and mining tenements held by the Company. Under the terms of the NAB facility, there are a number of undertakings related to the performance of the Company, and non-compliance with these undertakings could constitute an event of default. Under the terms of the facility the Company has up to 90 days to remedy or rectify a non-compliance event in relation to the undertakings. In the year, and as at 30 June 2012, there were no events of default under the facility.
On 21 August 2009, the Company entered into a A$50,000,000 Equity Line standby facility from US-based investment fund YA Global. Under the terms of the facility St Barbara may, at its discretion, issue ordinary shares to YA Global at any time over a 60 month period up to a total of A$50,000,000. There has been no draw down under this facility.
(E) LIQUIDITY RISK
Prudent liquidity risk management requires maintaining sufficient cash and marketable securities, the availability of funding through an adequate amount of committed credit facilities and the ability to close out market positions.
The Group manages liquidity risk by continuously monitoring forecast and actual cash flows and matching maturity profiles of financial assets and liabilities.
Surplus funds are invested in instruments that are tradeable in highly liquid markets.
Maturities of financial liabilities
The table below analyses the Group’s financial liabilities. The amounts disclosed in the table are the contractual undiscounted cash flows.
| Maturity of financial liabilities – 2012 | Maturity of financial liabilities – 2012 | Maturity of financial liabilities – 2012 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | |||||||
| Less than 6 | Between 1 and | contractual | Carrying | ||||
| $’000 | months | 6 – | 12 months | 5 years | Over 5 years | cash flows | amount |
| Finance lease liabilities | 597 | 549 | 1,065 | – | 2,211 | 2,280 | |
| Insurance funding liability | 1,409 | 604 | – | – | 2,013 | 1,976 | |
| Trade and other payables | 55,542 | – | – | – | 55,542 | 55,542 | |
| Derivative financial liabilities(1) | 729 | 2,101 | 13,547 | – | 16,377 | 16,377 | |
| 58,277 | 3,254 | 14,612 | – | 76,143 | 76,175 |
(1) Represents the mark-to-market valuation of the option collar structure, and does not represent a contractual cash flow. The mark-to-market valuations at 30 June 2012 will change over time as contracts mature, or with changes in the spot gold price and other option pricing variables.
| Maturity of financial liabilities – 2011 | Maturity of financial liabilities – 2011 | Maturity of financial liabilities – 2011 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | ||||||
| Less than 6 | Between 1 and | contractual | Carrying | |||
| $’000 | months | 6 – 12 months | 5 years | Over 5 years | cash flows | amount |
| Finance lease liabilities | 575 | 550 | 1,722 | – | 2,847 | 2,541 |
| Equipment finance facility | 8,023 | – | – | – | 8,023 | 7,860 |
| Insurance funding liability | 1,215 | 608 | – | – | 1,823 | 1,785 |
| Trade and other payables | 49,366 | – | – | – | 49,366 | 49,366 |
| Derivative financial liabilities(1) | – | – | 10,468 | – | 10,468 | 10,468 |
| 59,179 | 1,158 | 12,190 | – | 72,527 | 72,020 |
(1) Represents the mark-to-market valuation of the option collar structure, and does not represent a contractual cash flow. The mark-to-market valuations at 30 June 2011 will change over time as contracts mature, or with changes in the spot gold price and other option pricing variables.
(F) FAIR VALUE ESTIMATION
On-Balance Sheet
The net fair value of cash and cash equivalents and non-interest bearing monetary financial assets and financial liabilities of the Group approximates their carrying value. The net fair value of other monetary financial assets and financial liabilities is based upon market prices.
The fair value of the gold put and call options is as disclosed in Note 4(vii).
58
Note 3 Financial risk management cont.
(F) FAIR VALUE ESTIMATION cont
Fair values
The carrying amounts and the net fair values of financial assets and liabilities of the Group at balance date are:
| Fair values The carrying amounts and the net fair values of financial assets and liabilities of the Group at balance |
date are: |
|---|---|
| 2012 | 2011 |
| Carrying Amount $’000 Net Fair Value $’000 |
Carrying Amount $’000 Net Fair Value $’000 |
| Financial assets – Cash and cash equivalents 185,242 187,448 – Restricted cash 123 123 – Receivables 9,967 9,967 – Available for sale financial assets 154 154 – Gold put and call options (zero cost collar) 87 87 |
79,485 81,083 123 123 20,454 20,454 – – 2,367 2,367 |
| 195,573 197,779 |
102,429 104,027 |
| Financial liabilities – Payables 55,542 55,542 – Equipment financing facility – – – Gold put and call options (zero cost collar) 16,377 16,377 – Other loans 4,256 4,256 |
49,366 49,366 7,860 7,847 10,468 10,468 4,326 4,326 |
| 76,175 76,175 |
72,020 72,007 |
Note 4 Critical Accounting Estimates and Judgements
The preparation of financial statements requires management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions. Estimates and judgements are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and on various other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimate is changed and in any future periods affected.
The Group has identified the following critical accounting policies under which significant judgements, estimates and assumptions are made, and where actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions that could materially affect financial results or financial position reported in future periods.
(I) ORE RESERVE ESTIMATES
Reserves are estimates of the amount of gold product that can be economically extracted from the Group’s properties. In order to calculate reserves, estimates and assumptions are required about a range of geological, technical and economic factors, including quantities, grades, production techniques, recovery rates, production costs, future capital requirements, short and long term commodity prices and exchange rates.
Estimating the quantity and/or grade of reserves requires the size, shape and depth of ore bodies to be determined by analysing geological data. This process may require complex and difficult geological judgements and calculations to interpret the data.
The Group determines and reports ore reserves under the Australian Code for Reporting of Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves December 2004, known as the JORC Code. The JORC Code requires the use of reasonable investment assumptions to calculate reserves. Due to the fact that economic assumptions used to estimate reserves change from period to period, and geological data is generated during the course of operations, estimates of reserves may change from period to period.
Changes in reported reserves may affect the Group’s financial results and financial position in a number of ways, including:
-
Asset carrying values may be impacted due to changes in estimated future cash flows.
-
Depreciation and amortisation charged in the income statement may change where such charges are calculated using the units of production basis.
-
Underground capital development and waste stripping costs deferred in the balance sheet or charged in the income statement may change due to a revision in the development amortisation rates and stripping ratios.
-
Decommissioning, site restoration and environmental provisions may change where changes in estimated reserves affect expectations about the timing or cost of these activities.
Annual Report 2012 59
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements cont.
Note 4 Critical Accounting Estimates and Judgements cont.
(II) UNITS OF PRODUCTION METHOD OF AMORTISATION
The Group applies the units of production method for amortisation of its life of mine specific assets, which results in an amortisation charge proportional to the depletion of the anticipated remaining life of mine production. These calculations require the use of estimates and assumptions in relation to reserves and resources, metallurgy and the complexity of future capital development requirements; changes to these estimates and assumptions will impact the amortisation charge in the income statement and asset carrying values.
(III) AMORTISATION OF UNDERGROUND OPERATING DEVELOPMENT
The Group applies the units of production method for amortisation of underground operating development. The amortisation rates are determined on a level-by-level basis. In underground operations an estimate is made of the life of level average underground mining cost per recoverable ounce to expense underground costs in the income statement. Underground mining costs in the period are deferred based on the metres developed for a particular level. Previously deferred underground mining costs are released to the income statement based on the recoverable ounces produced in a level multiplied by the life of level cost per recoverable ounce rate.
Grade control drilling is deferred to the statement of financial position on a level-by-level basis. These amounts are released to the income statement as ounces are produced from the related mining levels.
(IV) IMPAIRMENT OF ASSETS
The Group assesses impairment of all assets at each reporting date by evaluating conditions specific to the Group and to the particular assets that may lead to impairment. The recoverable amount of each Cash Generating Unit (CGU) is determined as the higher of value-in-use and fair value less costs to sell, in accordance with accounting policy 1(j). These calculations require the use of estimates, which have been outlined in accounting policy 1(j). Value-in-use is generally determined as the present value of the estimated future cash flows. Present values are determined using a risk adjusted discount rate appropriate to the risks inherent in the asset.
Given the nature of the Group’s mining activities, future changes in assumptions upon which these estimates are based may give rise to a material adjustment to the carrying value of the CGU. This could lead to the recognition of impairment losses in the future. The inter-relationships of the significant assumptions upon which estimated future cash flows are based, however, are such that it is impracticable to disclose the extent of the possible effects of a change in a key assumption in isolation.
Future cash flow estimates are based on expected production volumes, the short and long term forecasts of the Australian dollar gold price, ore reserves, operating costs, future capital expenditure and restoration and rehabilitation costs. Management is required to make these estimates and
assumptions, which are subject to risk and uncertainty. As a result there is a possibility that changes in circumstances will alter these projections, which could impact on the recoverable amount of the assets. In such circumstances some or all of the carrying value of the assets may be impaired, giving rise to an impairment charge in the income statement.
With respect to the impairment write off taken against the Group’s Southern Cross CGU at 30 June 2012, value in use in relation to this CGU was determined by discounting the future cash flows generated from the continuing use of the operation and was based on the following key assumptions:
-
Cash flows were projected based on the life of mine plan, which is predominantly based on ore reserves.
-
Revenue was projected using a forecast gold price, which takes into consideration the prevailing spot price, and forward projections as at 30 June 2012.
-
A pre-tax nominal discount rate of 11.26% based on the weighted average cost of capital.
The above estimates are particularly sensitive to a change in the gold price.
(V) EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION EXPENDITURE
As set out in Note 1(f) exploration and evaluation expenditure is capitalised where reserves have been established for an area of interest and it is considered likely to be recoverable from future exploitation or sale. The accounting policy requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions as to future events and circumstances, in particular whether an economically viable extraction operation can be established. These estimates and assumptions may change as new information becomes available. If, after having capitalised the expenditure under the accounting policy, a judgement is made that recovery of the expenditure is unlikely, the relevant capitalised amount will be written off to the income statement.
(VI) REHABILITATION AND MINE CLOSURE PROVISIONS
As set out in Note 1(y), the value of these provisions represents the discounted value of the present obligation to restore, dismantle and rehabilitate each site. Significant judgement is required in determining the provisions for mine rehabilitation and closure as there are many transactions and other factors that will affect the ultimate costs necessary to rehabilitate the mine sites. The discounted value reflects a combination of management’s best estimate of the cost of performing the work required, the timing of the cash flows and the discount rate.
A change in any, or a combination of, the key assumptions used to determine the provisions could have a material impact on the carrying value of the provisions (refer to Note 23). The provision recognised for each site is reviewed at each reporting date and updated based on the facts and circumstances available at the time. Changes to the estimated future costs for operating sites are recognised in the balance sheet by adjusting both the restoration and rehabilitation asset and provision.
60
Note 4 Critical Accounting Estimates and Judgements cont.
(VI) REHABILITATION AND MINE CLOSURE PROVISIONS cont.
In estimating the rehabilitation provision at 30 June 2012, the following assumptions were made:
-
Timing of rehabilitation outflows was based on the life of mine plan of each operation, with the rehabilitation of legacy areas of disturbance scheduled accordingly.
-
Mine demolition costs are estimated on the basis of the expected mine life of each operation. Costs are adjusted for potential receipts through the sale of scrap metal.
-
Inflation is not applied to cost estimates.
-
A pre-tax real discount rate of 8.25% based on the risks specific to the liability.
(VII) DEFERRED TAX
During the year, $35,432,000 of previously unbooked tax losses were utilised against taxable profit for the year. At 30 June 2012 the Group recognised $20,731,000 of previously unbooked tax losses on the basis that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which these losses will be generated. Estimates of future taxable profits are based on forecast cash flows from operations.
(VIII) DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Group assesses the fair value of its gold bought put and sold call options (the “collar structure”) at each reporting date. At 30 June 2012, the fair value of the collar structure was negative $16,290,000. Refer to Note 3(b) for details of the impact fair value movements have on the financial statements.
Fair values have been determined using a ‘Level 2’ valuation method involving the use of a generally accepted option valuation model: inputs are based on market observable data for the asset or liability, either directly (i.e. prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices), at the reporting date and compared with valuations provided by the counterparties to the collar structure. These calculations require the use of estimates and assumptions. Any changes in assumptions in relation to gold prices and volatilities could have a material impact on the fair valuation attributable to the gold collar structure at the reporting date. When these assumptions change in the future the differences will impact the gold cash flow hedge reserve and/or income statement in the period in which the change occurs.
(IX) SHARE BASED PAYMENTS
The Group measures the cost of equity settled transactions with employees by reference to the fair value of the equity instruments at the date at which they are granted. The fair value is determined by an external valuer using an option pricing model, using the assumptions detailed in Note 37.
Where the vesting of share based payments contain market conditions, in estimating the fair value of the equity instruments issued, the Group assesses the probability of the market conditions being met, and therefore the probability of fair value vesting, by undertaking a Monte-Carlo simulation. The simulation performs sensitivity analysis on key assumptions in order to determine potential compliance with the market performance conditions. The simulation specifically performs sensitivity analysis on share price volatility based on the historical volatility for St Barbara Limited and the peer group companies. The results of the Monte-Carlo simulation are not intended to represent actual results, but are used as an estimation tool by management to assist in arriving at the judgment of probability.
Note 5 Segment Information
The Group has two operational business units: Leonora Operations and Southern Cross Operations. The operational business units are managed separately due to their separate geographic regions.
The Leonora Operations comprise two reportable segments: the Gwalia and King of the Hills underground mines. The results of both mines are reviewed regularly by the Group’s Executive Leadership Team, in particular production, cost per ounce and capital expenditures. Additionally, the revenue earned by each reportable segment exceeds 10 per cent of the Group’s consolidated revenue. The ore mined at the King of the Hills underground mine is processed through the Gwalia processing plant. The mine operating costs reported for King of the Hills includes an allocation of processing costs based on the tonnes of ore processed.
The King of the Hills mine was added as a reportable segment in the year to 30 June 2012 as the Executive Leadership Team commenced reviewing this as a standalone segment from 1 July 2011 following commencement of production at King of the Hills.
Information regarding the operations of each reportable segment is included below. Performance is measured based on segment profit before income tax, as this is deemed to be the most relevant in assessing performance after taking into account factors such as cost per ounce of production.
Annual Report 2012 61
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements cont.
Note 5 Segment Information cont.
| Gwalia | Gwalia | King of the Hills | Southern Cross | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 $’000 |
2011 $’000 |
2012 $’000 2011 $’000 |
2012 $’000 2011 $’000 |
2012 $’000 2011 $’000 |
| Revenue 292,197 Mine operating costs (110,542) |
184,996 (98,999) |
92,199 10,207 (41,562) (4,874) |
156,793 167,794 (116,773) (104,148) |
541,189 362,997 (268,877) (208,021) |
| Gross profit 181,655 |
85,997 | 50,637 5,333 |
40,020 63,646 |
272,312 154,976 |
| Royalties (11,841) Depreciation and amortisation (45,200) |
(7,075) (35,092) |
(3,684) (312) (17,168) (2,107) |
(6,553) (6,306) (33,824) (20,443) |
(22,078) (13,693) (96,192) (57,642) |
| Reportable segment profit/ (loss) before income tax 124,614 |
43,830 | 29,785 2,914 |
(357) 36,897 |
154,042 83,641 |
| Capital expenditure (54,355) |
(54,489) | (28,245) (33,760) |
(14,185) (29,577) |
(96,785) (117,826) |
| Reportable segment assets 375,238 |
352,344 | 50,699 35,958 |
22,877 43,664 |
448,814 431,966 |
Major Customer
Major customers to whom the Group provides goods that are more than 10% of external revenue are as follows:
| Revenue | Revenue | % of external revenue |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 $’000 |
2011 $’000 |
2012 % 2011 % |
| Customer A 176,794 Customer B 137,243 Customer C 104,529 Customer D 101,607 Customer E 21,016 |
151,692 76,729 92,009 – 39,145 |
32.6 42.2 25.4 21.3 19.3 25.6 18.8 – 3.9 10.9 |
Reconciliation of reportable segment revenues, profit, assets, and other material items:
| Consolidated | Consolidated |
|---|---|
| 2012 $’000 |
2011 $’000 |
| Revenues Total revenue for reportable segments 541,189 Other revenue 6,779 |
362,997 5,960 |
| Consolidated revenue 547,968 |
368,957 |
| Profit Total profit for reportable segments 154,042 Other income and revenue 7,701 Exploration expensed (16,246) Unallocated depreciation and amortisation (1,031) Finance costs (3,754) Net fair value movements on gold options (5,400) Net proceeds from sale of tenement rights – Corporate and support costs (13,732) Expenditure associated with acquisitions (5,664) Other corporate expenses (6,417) |
83,641 8,446 (13,284) (838) (4,040) 13,471 1,963 (13,819) (681) (6,230) |
| Consolidated profit before income tax 109,499 |
68,629 |
62
Note 5 Segment Information cont.
| Note 5 Segment Informationcont. | Note 5 Segment Informationcont. |
|---|---|
| Consolidated | |
| 2012 $’000 |
2011 $’000 |
| Assets Total assets for reportable segments 448,814 Cash and cash equivalents 185,242 Trade and other receivables 13,795 Available for sale financial assets 154 Capitalised borrowing costs 7,172 Derivative financial assets 87 Net deferred tax assets 22,215 Other assets 4,636 |
431,966 79,485 24,140 – 7,912 2,367 – 2,514 |
| Consolidated total assets 682,115 |
548,384 |
| Year ended 30 June 2012 | |
| Reportable segment totals Unallocated Consolidated totals |
|
| Other material items Mine operating costs (268,877) – (268,877) Depreciation and amortisation (96,192) (1,031) (97,223) |
|
| Year ended 30 June 2011 | |
| Reportable segment totals Unallocated Consolidated totals |
|
| Other material items Mine operating costs (208,021) – (208,021) Depreciation and amortisation (57,642) (838) (58,480) |
Note 6 Revenue
| Note 6 Revenue | Note 6 Revenue |
|---|---|
| Consolidated | |
| 2012 $’000 |
2011 $’000 |
| Sales revenue – continuing operations Sale of gold 538,411 Sale of silver 2,778 |
357,484 2,091 |
| 541,189 | 359,575 |
| Other revenue Interest revenue 6,442 Sub-lease rental 337 Third party revenue – ore processing – |
5,611 349 3,422 |
| 6,779 | 9,382 |
| Total revenue 547,968 |
368,957 |
Annual Report 2012 63
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements cont.
Note 7 Other income
| Note 7 Other income | Note 7 Other income |
|---|---|
| Consolidated | |
| 2012 $’000 |
2011 $’000 |
| Profit on sale of assets 67 Proceeds from sale of tenement rights – Other 855 |
1,224 1,963 1,262 |
| 922 | 4,449 |
Note 8 Expenses
| Consolidated | Consolidated |
|---|---|
| 2012 $’000 |
2011 $’000 |
| Profit before income tax includes the following specific expenses: Depreciation Buildings 1,607 Plant and equipment 15,313 Impairment write-offs 3,901 |
1,067 15,213 – |
| 20,821 | 16,280 |
| Amortisation Mine development costs 72,638 Capitalised borrowing costs 854 Plant/equipment finance leases 457 Impairment write-offs 2,453 |
41,085 702 413 – |
| 76,402 | 42,200 |
| Total depreciation & amortisation 97,223 |
58,480 |
| Finance Costs Interest paid/payable 448 Borrowing costs 138 Finance lease interest 278 Provisions: unwinding of discount 2,890 |
378 99 962 2,601 |
| 3,754 | 4,040 |
| Employee related expenses Contributions to defined contribution superannuation funds 2,985 Termination payments 403 Equity settled share-based payments (note 25(a)) 904 |
2,543 420 973 |
| 4,292 | 3,936 |
| Rental expense relating to operating leases | |
| Lease payments 802 |
873 |
64
Note 9 Significant items
Significant items are those items where their nature or amount is considered material to the financial report. Such items included within the consolidated results for the year are detailed below.
| Significant items are those items where their nature or amount is considered material to the financial report. Such items included within the consolidated results for the year are detailed below. |
Significant items are those items where their nature or amount is considered material to the financial report. Such items included within the consolidated results for the year are detailed below. |
|---|---|
| Consolidated | |
| 2012 $’000 |
2011 $’000 |
| Included within net realised/unrealised gains/(losses) on derivatives Net unrealised (loss)/gain on gold cash flow hedges(1) (6,102) Realised gain on gold cash flow hedges(1) 702 |
12,946 525 |
| (5,400) | 13,471 |
| Expenses associated with acquisitions(2) (5,664) |
– |
| Southern Cross asset write down(3) Included within mine operating costs – deferred operating development (3,865) Included within depreciation and amortisation (6,354) |
– – |
| (10,219) | – |
| Income tax benefit(4) 20,731 |
– |
| Included within Other Expenditure Native title payments – |
(2,400) |
| – Included within Other Income Profit on sale of Tarmoola processing plant – Proceeds from sale of tenement rights – |
(2,400) 1,164 1,963 |
| – | 3,127 |
| Total significant items (552) |
14,198 |
(1) Net realised/unrealised (loss)/gain on gold cash flow hedges
At 30 June 2012 the mark-to-market value of the Company’s gold put and call options (collar structure) was negative $16,290,000 (June 2011: negative $8,101,000). The put and call options at 30 June 2012 represent price protection for 175,000 ounces of King of the Hills production, and 20,000 ounces for Southern Cross production (June 2011: King of the Hills: 238,000 ounces; Southern Cross: nil ounces). In accordance with accounting standards the net unrealised loss, representing the movement in the time value of the gold options during the year, amounting to $6,102,000, was recognised in the income statement (2011: unrealised gain of $12,946,000). The net realised gain of $702,000 represents the unwinding of the unrealised mark-to-market loss previously recognised for gold options that were exercised or expired during the year (2011: realised gain of $525,000). The unrealised loss related to the movement in the intrinsic value of the gold options in the year of $3,054,000 (2011: gain of $17,102,000) was recognised in the gold cash flow hedge reserve in equity, with a realised gain of $264,000 recognised in the reserve for options that were exercised or expired during the year. Over time, unrealised losses on the gold options recognised in the income statement will reverse either through a change in the mark-to-market value of the options or maturity of the contracts.
- (2) Expenses associated with acquisitions
During the year, the Company engaged various consultants to assist with completing due diligence and in making an offer for Allied Gold (refer Note 33 for further details of the proposed Allied Gold transaction). In the prior year, these expenses were not reported as a significant item on the basis that the amount was not material.
(3) Southern Cross asset write-down
Based on an assessment of the Southern Cross operations cash generating unit (”CGU”) at 30 June 2012, an impairment write down was taken against assets of the CGU. While the Southern Cross operations are expected to generate positive net cash flows in the remaining period to closure, the cash flow estimates no longer support the full recovery of the carrying value of the Southern Cross CGU assets, including deferred mine operating development expenditure disclosed in mine operating costs in the Income Statement ($3,865,000); and capitalised mine development expenditure ($1,723,000), plant and equipment ($3,901,000) and capitalised exploration and evaluation expenditure ($730,000) all disclosed in depreciation and amortisation in the Income Statement.
- (4) Income tax benefit
At 30 June 2011, the Group had unbooked tax losses of $182,258,000 (before tax effect) – these losses were not booked as it was not probable at that time that future taxable profits would be generated to utilise these losses. At 30 June 2012, based on current operational forecasts, it is now probable that future taxable profits will be generated to utilise the Group’s tax losses. The credit of $20,731,000 recognised as an income tax benefit represents the booking of the tax effect of remaining losses at 30 June 2012 which were not previously booked.
Annual Report 2012 65
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements cont.
Note 10 Income tax expense
(A) INCOME TAX EXPENSE
| Note | Consolidated | Consolidated | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 2011 | ||
| $’000 | $’000 | ||
| Current tax expense | 35,432 | 20,479 | |
| Deferred income tax benefit | (56,163) | (20,479) | |
| Total | 9 | (20,731) | – |
(B) NUMERICAL RECONCILIATION OF INCOME TAX EXPENSE/(BENEFIT) TO PRIMA FACIE TAX PAYABLE
| Consolidated | Consolidated |
|---|---|
| 2012 $’000 |
2011 $’000 |
| Profit before income tax benefit 109,499 |
68,629 |
| Tax at the Australian tax rate of 30% 32,850 Tax effect of amounts not deductible/(taxable) in calculating taxable income: Legal and other capital expenditure 636 Equity settled share based payments 271 Transaction costs treated as capital cost base 1,576 Sundry items 99 Utilisation of previously unbooked tax losses (35,432) Recognition of previously unbooked tax losses (20,731) Change in previously unrecognised temporary differences – |
20,589 (382) 263 – 9 (8,273) – (12,206) |
| Income tax benefit (20,731) |
– |
(C) DEFERRED TAX BALANCE
| Consolidated | Consolidated |
|---|---|
| 2012 $’000 |
2011 $’000 |
| Deferred tax liabilities Accrued income 543 Mining properties – exploration 23,470 Mining properties – development 176,194 Consumables 10,418 Capitalised convertible notes costs 7,172 |
464 20,529 178,460 9,711 7,911 |
| Total 217,797 |
217,075 |
| Tax effect @ 30% 65,339 |
65,123 |
| Deferred tax assets Tax losses 227,897 Tax losses not booked – Provisions and accruals 43,459 Hedges at fair value 16,290 Investments at fair value 96 Tax assets without a carrying amount 4,104 |
342,689 (182,258) 41,416 8,101 – 7,127 |
| Total 291,846 |
217,075 |
| Tax effect @ 30% 87,554 |
65,123 |
| Net deferred tax asset 22,215 |
– |
66
Note 11 Cash and cash equivalents
| Note 11 Cash and cash equivalents | Note 11 Cash and cash equivalents |
|---|---|
| Consolidated | |
| 2012 $’000 |
2011 $’000 |
| Cash at bank and on hand 23,442 Term deposits 161,800 |
4,485 75,000 |
| 185,242 | 79,485 |
(A) CASH AT BANK AND ON HAND
Cash at bank at 30 June 2012 invested “at call” was earning interest at an average rate of 3.82% per annum (2011: 4.90% per annum).
(B) DEPOSITS
The deposits at 30 June 2012 were earning interest at rates of between 4.04% and 5.92% per annum (2011: rates of between 6.00% and 6.23% per annum). While term deposits are invested for defined periods, all deposits can be immediately accessed. At 30 June 2012, the average time to maturity was 41 days (2011: 68 days), with $10,000,000 maturing between 90 to 180 days (2011: $36,000,000) from balance date.
Note 12 Trade and other receivables
| Consolidated | Consolidated |
|---|---|
| 2012 $’000 |
2011 $’000 |
| Current assets Trade receivables 3,646 Other receivables 6,321 Restricted cash(1) 123 Prepayments 3,705 |
15,199 5,255 123 3,563 |
| 13,795 | 24,140 |
(1) Restricted cash at 30 June 2012 is cash placed on deposit to secure five bank guarantees in respect of obligations entered into for environmental performance bonds issued in favour of the Western Australian Department of Industry and Resources. These deposits earned interest at an average interest rate of 3.45%.
(A) EFFECTIVE INTEREST RATES AND CREDIT RISK
Information concerning the effective interest rate and credit risk of receivables is set out in Note 3 and Note 16.
Note 13 Inventories
| Note 13 Inventories | Note 13 Inventories |
|---|---|
| Consolidated | |
| 2012 $’000 |
2011 $’000 |
| Consumables 10,418 Ore stockpiles 760 Gold in circuit 10,689 Bullion on hand – |
9,711 723 6,407 1,017 |
| 21,867 | 17,858 |
(A) LOWER OF COST AND NET REALISABLE VALUE
At 30 June 2012, all categories of inventory were valued at cost (2011: all categories at cost).
Annual Report 2012 67
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements cont.
Note 14 Deferred mining costs
| Consolidated | Consolidated |
|---|---|
| 2012 $’000 |
2011 $’000 |
| Current Deferred operating mine development 23,789 |
12,934 |
| Non-current Deferred operating mine development 5,917 |
10,230 |
Note 15 Available-for-sale financial assets
| Consolidated | Consolidated |
|---|---|
| 2012 $’000 |
2011 $’000 |
| Current At beginning of year – Additions 250 Revaluation loss taken to equity (96) |
– – – |
| 154 | – |
(A) LISTED SECURITIES
Available-for-sale financial assets as at 30 June 2012 consisted of companies listed on the Australian Securities Exchange.
Note 16 Financial instruments
(A) CREDIT RISK EXPOSURES
Refer Note 3 for the Group’s exposure to credit risk.
(B) INTEREST RATE RISK EXPOSURES
The Group’s exposure to interest rate risk and the effective weighted average interest rate by maturity periods is set out in the following tables. Exposures arise predominantly from assets and liabilities bearing variable interest rates as the Group intends to hold fixed rate assets and liabilities to maturity.
| fixed rate assets and liabilities to maturity. | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | Fixed Interest Maturing in | ||||
| Floating | Over 1 to 5 | ||||
| Interest rate | 1 year or less | years | Non- interest | Total | |
| Financial assets | $’000 | $’000 | $’000 | bearing $’000 | $’000 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 23,442 | 161,800 | – | – | 185,242 |
| Restricted cash and cash equivalents | 123 | – | – | – | 123 |
| Receivables | – | – | – | 9,967 | 9,967 |
| Available for sale financial assets | – | – | – | 154 | 154 |
| Gold put and call options | – | – | – | 87 | 87 |
| 23,565 | 161,800 | – | 10,208 | 195,573 | |
| Weighted average interest rate | 3.78% | 5.48% | |||
| Financial liabilities | |||||
| Trade and other payables | – | – | – | 55,542 | 55,542 |
| Finance lease liabilities | – | 1,024 | 992 | 264 | 2,280 |
| Gold put and call options | – | – | – | 16,377 | 16,377 |
| Insurance premium funding | – | 1,976 | – | – | 1,976 |
| – | 3,000 | 992 | 72,183 | 76,175 | |
| Weighted average interest rate | 5.93% | 7.59% | |||
| Net financial assets/(liabilities) | 23,565 | 158,800 | (992) | (61,975) | 119,398 |
68
Note 16 Financial Instruments cont.
(B) INTEREST RATE RISK EXPOSURES cont.
| 2011 | Fixed Interest Maturing in | Fixed Interest Maturing in | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Floating | Over 1 to 5 | ||||
| Interest rate | 1 year or less | years | Non- interest | Total | |
| Financial assets | $’000 | $’000 | $’000 | bearing $’000 | $’000 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 4,485 | 75,000 | – | – | 79,485 |
| Restricted cash and cash equivalents | 123 | – | – | – | 123 |
| Receivables | – | – | – | 20,454 | 20,454 |
| Gold put and call options | – | – | – | 2,367 | 2,367 |
| 4,608 | 75,000 | – | 22,821 | 102,429 | |
| Weighted average interest rate | 4.89% | 6.12% | |||
| Financial liabilities | |||||
| Trade and other payables | – | – | – | 49,366 | 49,366 |
| Finance lease liabilities | – | 954 | 1,581 | 6 | 2,541 |
| Equipment financing facility | 7,860 | – | – | – | 7,860 |
| Gold put and call options | – | – | – | 10,468 | 10,468 |
| Insurance premium funding | – | 1,785 | – | – | 1,785 |
| 7,860 | 2,739 | 1,581 | 59,840 | 72,020 | |
| Weighted average interest rate | 7.73% | 5.97% | 7.52% | ||
| Net financial assets/(liabilities) | (3,252) | 72,261 | (1,581) | (37,019) | 30,409 |
Note 17 Property, plant and equipment
| Note 17 Property, plant and equipment | Note 17 Property, plant and equipment |
|---|---|
| Consolidated | |
| 2012 $’000 |
2011 $’000 |
| Non-current Land 1,093 Housing and site buildings 21,626 Plant and equipment 145,215 Accumulated depreciation and impairment (64,006) |
1,093 17,870 129,520 (42,733) |
| 103,928 | 105,750 |
Annual Report 2012 69
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements cont.
Note 17 Property, plant and equipment cont.
Reconciliation of the carrying amounts for each class of property, plant and equipment is set out below:
| Reconciliation of the carrying amounts for each class of property, plant and equipment is set out below: | Reconciliation of the carrying amounts for each class of property, plant and equipment is set out below: |
|---|---|
| Consolidated | |
| 2012 $’000 |
2011 $’000 |
| Land 1,093 |
1,093 |
| Housing and site buildings At the beginning of the year 15,163 Additions 3,756 Depreciation (1,607) |
16,230 – (1,067) |
| At the end of the year 17,312 |
15,163 |
| Plant and equipment At the beginning of the year 89,494 Additions 15,701 Disposals (1) Depreciation (15,770) Assets written off (3,901) |
94,773 12,176 (1,829) (15,626) – |
| At the end of the year 85,523 |
89,494 |
| Total 103,928 |
105,750 |
(A) SECURITY
As at 30 June 2012, plant and equipment with a carrying value of $1,997,000 (2011: $31,909,000) was pledged as security for finance leases (Note 21).
In accordance with the security arrangements in relation to commercial banking facilities, all remaining assets of the Group have been pledged as security to the National Australia Bank Limited and Barclays Bank PLC for performance bond and hedging facilities.
Note 18 Mine properties
| Consolidated | Consolidated |
|---|---|
| 2012 $’000 |
2011 $’000 |
| Non-current Mine Properties – development At beginning of the year 283,991 Direct expenditure 80,757 Transferred from exploration and evaluation – Amortisation for the year (73,378) Mine development written off (1,723) |
216,530 106,312 2,844 (41,695) – |
| At end of the year 289,647 |
283,991 |
70
Note 19 Exploration and evaluation
| Consolidated | Consolidated |
|---|---|
| 2012 $’000 |
2011 $’000 |
| Non-current Exploration and evaluation At beginning of the year 11,629 Tenements written off – Expenditure capitalised for the year 4,575 Transferred to mine properties – Exploration and evaluation written off (730) |
5,735 (125) 8,863 (2,844) – |
| At end of the year 15,474 |
11,629 |
Note 20 Trade and other payables
| Consolidated | Consolidated |
|---|---|
| 2012 $’000 |
2011 $’000 |
| Current Trade payables 54,434 Other payables 1,108 |
47,397 1,969 |
| 55,542 | 49,366 |
Note 21 Interest bearing borrowings
| Consolidated | Consolidated |
|---|---|
| 2012 $’000 |
2011 $’000 |
| Current Secured Lease liabilities (Note 29) 1,067 Equipment finance facility (Note 29) – Transaction costs – |
960 7,860 (114) |
| 1,067 | 8,706 |
| Unsecured Insurance premium funding 1,976 |
1,785 |
| Total current 3,043 |
10,491 |
| Non-current Secured Lease liabilities (Note 29) 1,213 |
1,581 |
| Total non-current 1,213 |
1,581 |
(A) INTEREST RATE RISK EXPOSURES
Details of the Group’s exposure to interest rate changes on borrowings are set out in Note 16.
(B) EQUIPMENT FINANCE FACILITY
In August 2011, the Company repaid the remaining amount owing on the equipment facility held with GE Commercial Finance.
Annual Report 2012 71
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements cont.
Note 21 Interest bearing borrowings cont.
(C) SET-OFF OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
The parent entity has established a legal right of set-off with a financial institution over cash on deposit to secure the issue of bank guarantees for the purpose of environmental performance bonds. At 30 June 2012 restricted cash for this purpose amounted to $123,000 (2011: $123,000).
Note 22 Derivative financial assets and liabilities
| Note 22 Derivative financial assets and liabilities | Note 22 Derivative financial assets and liabilities |
|---|---|
| Consolidated | |
| 2012 $’000 |
2011 $’000 |
| Current assets Fair value of gold option collar 87 |
2,085 |
| Non-current assets Fair value of gold option collar – |
282 |
| Current liabilities Fair value of gold option collar 2,830 |
– |
| Non-current liabilities | |
| Fair value of gold option collar 13,547 |
10,468 |
(A) INSTRUMENTS USED BY THE GROUP
Refer to Note 3 ‘Financial Risk Management’ for details on instruments used by the Group.
(B) ESTIMATION OF CURRENT AND NON-CURRENT ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
In estimating the fair value of the gold option collars at each reporting date, the Group obtains an independent valuation of each option tranche within each collar. The valuation is performed using a generally accepted option valuation model where inputs are based on market observable data for the asset or liability, either directly (i.e. prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices). Each tranche is then classified as a current or non-current asset or liability accordingly.
Note 23 Provisions
| Consolidated | Consolidated |
|---|---|
| 2012 $’000 |
2011 $’000 |
| Current Employee benefits – annual leave 2,569 Employee benefits – long service leave 1,583 Employee benefits – other 2,078 Provision for rehabilitation 3,694 Other provisions 900 |
2,244 1,056 890 3,643 149 |
| 10,824 | 7,982 |
| Non-current Provision for rehabilitation 30,071 Employee benefits – long service leave 1,212 |
30,888 1,261 |
| 31,283 | 32,149 |
72
Note 23 Provisions cont. MOVEMENTS IN PROVISIONS
| Consolidated | Consolidated |
|---|---|
| 2012 $’000 |
2011 $’000 |
| Rehabilitation Balance at start of year 34,531 Unwinding of discount 2,890 Expenditure incurred (3,656) |
32,474 2,601 (544) |
| Balance at end of year 33,765 |
34,531 |
Note 24 Contributed equity
(A) SHARE CAPITAL
| Parent entity | Parent entity | Parent entity | Parent entity |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Shares |
2011 Shares |
2012 $’000 |
2011 $’000 |
| Ordinary shares – fully paid 324,620,389 |
325,615,389 | 613,275 | 615,521 |
| (B) MOVEMENTS IN ORDINARY SHARE CAPITAL: | |||
| Date Details Notes |
Number of shares |
Issue price ($/share) |
$’000 |
| 1 July 2010 Plus Shares issued on exercise of options (i) Transfer of Option Reserve on conversion of options (ii) Shares on issue prior to consolidation Shares on issue following share consolidation (iii) |
1,952,668,407 1,000,000 |
0.28 | 614,997 279 245 – – |
| 1,953,668,407 | |||
| 325,615,389 | |||
| 30 Jun 2011 | 325,615,389 | 615,521 | |
| Less Share buybacks (iv) Share buyback transaction costs |
(995,000) | 2.25 | (2,239) (7) |
| 30 Jun 2012 Closing balance |
324,620,389 | 613,275 |
(i) Shares issued on exercise of unlisted options held by executives and employees.
(ii) Transfer of the fair value in the Share Based Payment Reserve relating to the options exercised at (i).
(iii) On 18 November 2010 shareholders approved a share consolidation of six existing shares for one new share of the Company’s issued capital.
(iv) Pursuant to the on-market share buy-back facility announced on 21 December 2011, the Company bought back 995,000 shares during February and March 2012.
(C) ORDINARY SHARES
Ordinary shares entitle the holder to participate in dividends and the proceeds on winding up of the Company in proportion to the number of and amounts paid on the shares held.
On a show of hands every holder of ordinary shares present at a meeting in person or by proxy, is entitled to one vote, and upon a poll each share is entitled to one vote.
(D) OPTIONS AND PERFORMANCE RIGHTS
Information relating to the St Barbara Employee Option Plan and Performance Rights Plan, including details of options and rights issued, exercised and lapsed during the financial year and options outstanding at the end of the financial year, is set out in Note 37.
Annual Report 2012 73
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements cont.
Note 25 Reserves and accumulated losses
(A) RESERVES
| Consolidated | Consolidated |
|---|---|
| 2012 $’000 |
2011 $’000 |
| Reserves Share based payments reserve 2,996 Investment fair value reserve (67) Gold cash flow hedge reserve (3,394) |
3,108 – (2,059) |
| (465) | 1,049 |
| Share based payments reserve Balance at start of year 3,108 Option/performance rights expense 1,828 Options exercised – Options expired and transferred to retained earnings (1,016) Options not vesting (924) |
2,484 973 (245) – (104) |
| Balance at end of year 2,996 |
3,108 |
| Investments fair value reserve Balance at start of year – Fair value adjustment (96) Tax effect of fair value adjustments 29 |
– – – |
| Balance at end of year (67) |
– |
| Gold cash flow hedge reserve Balance at start of year (2,059) Options exercised/expired 264 Fair value adjustments (3,054) Tax effect of fair value movements 1,455 |
(19,161) – 17,102 – |
| Balance at end of year (3,394) |
(2,059) |
(B) ACCUMULATED LOSSES
Movements in accumulated losses were as follows:
| Consolidated | Consolidated |
|---|---|
| 2012 $’000 |
2011 $’000 |
| Balance at start of year (180,223) Profit attributable to members of the Company 130,230 Transferred from share based payment reserve 1,016 |
(248,852) 68,629 – |
| Balance at end of year (48,977) |
(180,223) |
(C) SHARE BASED PAYMENTS RESERVE
The share based payments reserve is used to recognise the fair value of options and rights issued to executives and employees but not exercised.
$1,016,000 previously recognised in the share based payments reserve in respect of 416,668 options, which expired during the year was transferred to accumulated losses. Accounting standards preclude the reversal through the Income Statement of amounts which have been booked in the share based payments reserve for options which have previously vested but subsequently expire.
74
Note 25 Reserves and accumulated losses cont.
(D) GOLD CASH FLOW HEDGE RESERVE
At each balance sheet date, a mark-to-market valuation of the Group’s gold bought put options and sold call options (the “collar structure”) is performed. Where the hedge is effective, changes in fair value relating to the intrinsic portion of the valuation are recognised in the gold cash flow hedge reserve. If the underlying options expire, the reserve relating to the expired options reverses against the derivatives liability.
Note 26 Parent Entity disclosures
As at, and throughout, the financial year ended 30 June 2012, the parent company of the Group was St Barbara Limited.
(A) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
| Parent Entity | Parent Entity |
|---|---|
| 2012 $’000 |
2011 $’000 |
| Results of the parent entity Profit for the year 130,230 Other comprehensive income (1,402) |
68,629 17,102 |
| Total comprehensive income for the year 128,828 |
85,731 |
Other comprehensive income is set out in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income.
| Parent Entity | Parent Entity |
|---|---|
| 2012 $’000 |
2011 $’000 |
| Financial position of the parent entity at year end Current assets 244,936 Total assets 682,295 Current liabilities 83,640 Total liabilities 129,683 Total equity of the parent entity comprising of: Share capital 613,275 Share based payments reserve 2,996 Investment fair value reserve (67) Gold cash flow hedge reserve (3,394) Accumulated losses (60,198) |
136,504 548,564 79,240 123,438 615,521 3,108 – (2,059) (191,444) |
| Total equity 552,612 |
425,126 |
(B) PARENT ENTITY CONTINGENCIES
The parent entity had no contingent liabilities at 30 June 2012.
(C) PARENT ENTITY GUARANTEES
Refer Note 28 for details of bank guarantees issued by the parent entity.
(D) PARENT ENTITY CAPITAL COMMITMENTS FOR ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
| Company | Company |
|---|---|
| 2012 $’000 |
2011 $’000 |
| Contracted but not yet provided for and payable Within one year – |
– |
Annual Report 2012 75
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements cont.
Note 27 Remuneration of auditors
During the year the following fees were paid or payable for services provided by the auditor of the parent entity, its related practices and non-related audit firms:
| During the year the following fees were paid or payable for services provided by the auditor of the parent entity, its related practices and non-related audit firms: |
During the year the following fees were paid or payable for services provided by the auditor of the parent entity, its related practices and non-related audit firms: |
|---|---|
| Consolidated | |
| 2012 $’000 |
2011 $’000 |
| (A) ASSURANCE SERVICES Audit and audit related services KPMG Australian firm Audit and review of financial reports 261 Audit and review of financial controls – |
245 120 |
| Total remuneration for audit and audit related services 261 |
365 |
| (B) NON-AUDIT SERVICES KPMG Australian firm Financial and accounting due diligence services 495 |
– |
| Total remuneration for non-audit services 495 |
– |
Note 28 Contingencies
(A) CONTINGENT LIABILITIES AND ASSETS
The Company and consolidated entity had no contingent liabilities at 30 June 2012.
(B) BANK GUARANTEES
The Group has negotiated bank guarantees in favour of various government authorities and service providers. The total of these guarantees at 30 June 2012 was $20,608,000 (2011: $20,716,000). Security is provided to the National Australia Bank Limited (“NAB”) (refer to Note 17) for $20,485,000 of this amount through a fixed and floating charge over the Group’s assets. Cash held on deposit with the Commonwealth Bank of Australia secures the remaining $123,000 as at 30 June 2012 (refer to Note 12).
Under the terms of the NAB facility, there are a number of undertakings related to the performance of the Company. Non compliance with these undertakings could constitute an event of default. In the year, and as at 30 June 2012, there were no events of default under the facility.
(C) GOLD BOUGHT PUT AND SOLD CALL OPTIONS
In the 2011 financial year, the Company negotiated a 250,000 ounce zero cost collar hedge facility with National Australia Bank Limited (NAB) and Barclays Bank PLC (“Barclays”) to provide price protection for production from King of the Hills. In August 2011, the Company negotiated a 100,000 ounce zero cost collar hedge facility with NAB and Barclays to provide price protection for production from Southern Cross. Refer to Note 3 for details of ounces exercised/expired during the year, and ounces remaining under these facilities.
Security is provided to NAB and Barclays through a fixed and floating charge over the assets of the Group, excluding assets securing finance leases.
Under the terms of the hedge facility there are a number of undertakings related to the performance of the Company. Non compliance with these undertakings could constitute an event of default. In the year, and as at 30 June 2012, there were no events of default under the facility.
Note 29 Commitments for expenditure
| Note 29 Commitments for expenditure | Note 29 Commitments for expenditure |
|---|---|
| Consolidated | |
| 2012 $’000 |
2011 $’000 |
| EXPLORATION In order to maintain rights of tenure to mining tenements, the Group is committed to tenement rentals and minimum exploration expenditure in terms of the requirements of the relevant state government mining departments in Western Australia, New South Wales and South Australia. This requirement will continue for future years with the amount dependent upon tenement holdings. 9,677 |
9,580 |
76
Note 29 Commitments for expenditure cont.
| Note 29 Commitments for expenditurecont. | Note 29 Commitments for expenditurecont. |
|---|---|
| Consolidated | |
| 2012 $’000 |
2011 $’000 |
| Finance Lease Commitments Payable not later than one year 1,144 Payable later than one year, not later than five years 1,065 |
1,124 1,722 |
| 2,209 Future finance charges (193) |
2,846 (311) |
| Recognised as a liability 2,016 Lease incentives on non-cancellable operating leases included in lease liabilities 264 |
2,535 6 |
| Total lease liabilities 2,280 |
2,541 |
| Current (Note 21) 1,067 Non-current (Note 21) 1,213 |
960 1,581 |
| 2,280 | 2,541 |
| These finance lease commitments relate to vehicles and plant and equipment, and are based on the cost of the assets over a period of up to 48 months. |
and are payable |
| Consolidated | |
| 2012 $’000 |
2011 $’000 |
| Equipment Finance Facility Payable not later than one year – Future finance charges – |
8,023 (163) |
| Total lease liabilities – |
7,860 |
| Current (Note 21) – Non-current (Note 21) – |
7,860 – |
| – | 7,860 |
| Consolidated | |
| 2012 $’000 |
2011 $’000 |
| Analysis of Non-Cancellable Operating Lease Commitments Payable not later than one year 916 Payable later than one year, not later than five years 3,093 Payable later than five years 85 |
265 1,181 744 |
| 4,094 | 2,190 |
| Consolidated | |
| 2012 $’000 |
2011 $’000 |
| Analysis of Non-Cancellable Operating Sub-lease receipts Receivable not later than one year 207 Receivable later than one year, not later than five years 607 |
199 813 |
| 814 | 1,012 |
Annual Report 2012 77
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements cont.
Note 30 Related party transactions
A) DIRECTORS AND KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL
Disclosures relating to Directors and key management personnel are set out in Note 38.
(B) TRANSACTIONS WITH ENTITIES IN THE WHOLLY-OWNED GROUP
St Barbara Limited is the parent entity in the wholly-owned group comprising the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries.
During the year the Company did not transact with any entities in the wholly-owned group (2011: $ Nil). Net receivables from subsidiaries amounted to $2,000 (2011: $2,000). The Company provided accounting and administrative assistance free of charge to all of its wholly-owned subsidiaries.
Loans payable to and advanced from wholly-owned subsidiaries to the Company are interest free, and payable on demand.
(C) AMOUNTS RECEIVABLE FROM AND PAYABLE TO ENTITIES IN THE WHOLLY-OWNED GROUP AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES
| Company | Company |
|---|---|
| 2012 $’000 |
2011 $’000 |
| Aggregate amounts receivable at balance date from: Entities in the wholly-owned group 852 Less provision for doubtful receivables (850) |
852 (850) |
| 2 | 2 |
| Aggregate amounts payable at balance date to: Entities in the wholly-owned group 11,401 |
11,401 |
(D) GUARANTEES
Subsidiary companies have guaranteed the parent entity’s obligations under the bank guarantee facilities provided by the National Australia Bank Limited and Commonwealth Bank of Australia.
(E) TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Outstanding balances are unsecured, interest free and are repayable in cash on demand.
(F) AMOUNTS RECEIVABLE FROM DIRECTOR RELATED ENTITIES
At 30 June 2012, there were no amounts receivable from Director related entities (2011: $ Nil).
(G) OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY AND THEIR DIRECTOR RELATED ENTITIES
During the year ended 30 June 2012, there were no other transactions with Directors of the Company and their Director related entities.
78
Note 31 Controlled entities
The Group consists of the Company and its wholly-owned controlled entities as follows.
| The Group consists of the Company and its wholly-owned controlled entities as follows. | |
|---|---|
| Equity holding | Carrying value of Company’s investment |
| Name of entity Class of Shares June 2012 % June 2011 % |
June 2012 $’000 June 2011 $’000 |
| Australian Eagle Oil Co Pty Ltd Ordinary 100 100 Capvern Pty Ltd Ordinary 100 100 Eagle Group Management Pty Ltd Ordinary 100 100 Murchison Gold Pty Ltd Ordinary 100 100 Kingkara Pty Ltd Ordinary 100 100 Oakjade Pty Ltd Ordinary 100 100 Regalkey Holdings Pty Ltd Ordinary 100 100 Silkwest Holdings Pty Ltd Ordinary 100 100 Sixteenth Ossa Pty Ltd Ordinary 100 100 Vafitu Pty Ltd Ordinary 100 100 Zygot Pty Ltd Ordinary 100 100 |
178 178 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – |
| 178 178 |
Each company in the Group was incorporated in Australia.
Note 32 Interests in jointly controlled assets
| June 2012 | June 2011 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Equity % | Equity % | Joint Venturers | |
| WESTERN AUSTRALIA | |||
| Leonora Region | |||
| Mount Newman – Victory | 87% | 87% | Astro Diamond Mines N.L. |
| Sandy Soak | 91% | 91% | Hunter Resources Pty Ltd |
| Melita | 80% | 80% | Dalrymple Resources N.L. |
| McEast/Pipeline | 20% | 20% | Cheperon Gold Partnership |
| Black Cat | 40% | 40% | Terrain Minerals Ltd |
| Silver Phantom | 70% | 70% | Bellriver Pty Ltd |
| South Rankin | 75% | 75% | Comet Resources Limited |
As at 30 June 2012 there was no joint venture assets recorded in the balance sheet (2011: Nil).
Note 33 Events occurring after the balance sheet date
The Directors are not aware of any matter or circumstance that has arisen since the end of the financial year that, in their opinion, has significantly affected or may significantly affect in future years the Company’s operations, the results of those operations or the state of affairs, except for the following:
- On 29 June 2012, the Company announced a proposal to acquire all the shares of Allied Gold Mining Plc (“Allied Gold”) via a scheme of arrangement. Under the terms of the recommended offer, St Barbara will acquire the entire issued and to be issued ordinary share capital of Allied Gold for A$1.025 in cash and 0.8 St Barbara shares for each Allied Gold share (the “Offer”). Based on the closing price of St Barbara shares on the Australian Securities Exchange on 28 June 2012, being the last trading day before the announcement, the offer values Allied Gold at $556 million.
The cash consideration payable under the terms of the Offer will be funded from St Barbara’s existing cash resources and additionally by using a A$120 million term loan facility. Following implementation of the Offer, Allied Gold will become a wholly owned subsidiary of St Barbara.
On 14 August 2012, the shareholders of Allied Gold voted in favour of the scheme of arrangement. The court hearing in the UK to sanction the scheme is to be held on 30 August 2012. The effective date of the combination, subject to court approval, is expected to be by 7 September 2012.
Annual Report 2012 79
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements cont.
Note 34 Reconciliation of profit after income tax to net cash flows from operating activities
| Note 34 Reconciliation of profit after income tax to net cash flows from operating activities | Note 34 Reconciliation of profit after income tax to net cash flows from operating activities |
|---|---|
| Consolidated | |
| 2012 $’000 |
2011 $’000 |
| Profit after tax for the year 130,230 Depreciation and amortisation 90,869 Asset impairment write offs 10,219 Recognition of unbooked tax losses (20,731) Profit on sale of assets (67) Gain on sale of tenement rights – Net realised/unrealised loss/(gain) on gold derivative fair value movements 5,400 Tenement write-off – Equity settled share-based payments 904 Change in operating assets and liabilities (Increase)/decrease in receivables and prepayments 10,345 (Increase)/decrease in inventories (4,009) (Increase)/decrease in other assets (10,408) Increase/(decrease) in trade creditors and payables 7,037 Increase/(decrease) in non-current provisions (866) Increase/(decrease) in other liabilities 2,904 |
68,629 58,480 – – (1,180) (1,963) (13,471) 125 869 (8,925) 197 (14,049) 11,217 1,504 1,640 |
| Net cash flows from operating activities 221,827 |
103,073 |
Note 35 Non-cash investing and financing activities
| Consolidated | Consolidated |
|---|---|
| 2012 $’000 |
2011 $’000 |
| Acquisition of vehicles and equipment through finance leases 491 |
1,552 |
Note 36 Earnings per share
- (A) BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE
| Consolidated | Consolidated |
|---|---|
| 2012 Cents |
2011 Cents |
| Profit attributable to the ordinary equity holders of the Company 40.04 (B) DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE |
21.05 |
| Consolidated | |
| 2012 Cents |
2011 Cents |
| Profit attributable to the ordinary equity holders of the Company 39.60 |
20.94 |
80
Note 36 Earnings per share cont.
(C) RECONCILIATION OF EARNINGS USED IN CALCULATING EARNINGS PER SHARE
| Consolidated | Consolidated |
|---|---|
| 2012 $’000 |
2011 $’000 |
| Basic and diluted earnings per share: Profit after tax for the year 130,230 |
68,629 |
(D) WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES
| Consolidated | Consolidated |
|---|---|
| 2012 Number |
2011 Number |
| Weighted average number of ordinary shares used as the denominator in calculating basic earnings per share 325,285,005 |
326,031,238 |
| Weighted average number of ordinary shares and potential ordinary shares used as the denominator in calculating diluted earnings per share 328,885,173 |
327,753,818 |
(E) INFORMATION CONCERNING THE CLASSIFICATION OF SECURITIES
(i) Options
Executive Options and Options granted to employees under the St Barbara Limited Employee Option Plans are considered to be potential ordinary shares and have been included in the determination of diluted earnings per share to the extent to which they are dilutive. The options have not been included in the determination of basic earnings per share. Details relating to the options are set out in Note 37.
(ii) Performance rights
Performance rights granted to employees under the St Barbara Performance Rights Plan are considered to be potential ordinary shares and have been included in the determination of diluted earnings per share to the extent to which they are dilutive. The rights have not been included in the determination of basic earnings per share. Details relating to the rights are set out in Note 37.
Note 37 Share-based payments
(A) EMPLOYEE OPTION PLAN
The establishment of the St Barbara Limited Employee Option Plan was approved by shareholders at the 2001 Annual General Meeting. Options are granted as part of an employee’s total remuneration package. Options are granted for a three to five year period. Options granted under the plan carry no dividend or voting rights.
When exercisable, each option is convertible into one ordinary share.
Set out below are summaries of options granted to employees under the St Barbara Limited Employee Option Plan approved by shareholders:
Consolidated and parent entity – 2012
| Balance at | Granted | Exercised | Expired | Balance at | Exercisable | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| start of the | during the | during the | during the | end of the | at end of | |||
| Exercise | year | year | year | year | year | the year | ||
| Grant Date | Expiry Date | Price | Number | Number | Number | Number | Number | Number |
| 11 Sep 06 | 11 Sep 11 | $2.863 | 333,334 | – | – | 333,334(1) | – | – |
| 01 Dec 06 | 01 Dec 11 | $3.181 | 83,334 | – | – | 83,334(1) | – | – |
| 06 May 09 | 02 Mar 14 | $2.286 | 251,350 | – | – | 251,350(3) | – | – |
| 06 May 09 | 03 Apr 14 | $2.466 | 517,354 | – | – | 517,354(3) | – | – |
| 23 Sep 09(2) | 23 Sep 14 | $1.722 | 2,284,737 | – | – | **329,474(4) ** | 1,955,263 | – |
| Total | 3,470,109 | – | – | 1,514,846 | 1,955,263 | – | ||
| Weighted average exercise price | $2.02 | $2.40 | $1.72 | – |
(1) Options expired during the year.
(2) Vesting of options granted in September 2009 is subject to performance criteria as discussed below.
(3) Options did not meet performance criteria at 30 June 2012, therefore did not vest.
(4) Expired on termination of employment with the Company.
Annual Report 2012 81
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements cont.
Note 37 Share-based payments cont.
(A) EMPLOYEE OPTION PLAN cont.
Consolidated and parent entity – 2011
| Balance at | Granted | Exercised | Expired | Balance at | Exercisable | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| start of the | during the | during the | during the | end of the | at end of | |||
| Exercise | year | year | year | year | year | the year | ||
| Grant Date | Expiry Date | Price | Number | Number | Number | Number | Number | Number |
| 30 Sep 05 | 30 Sep 10 | $1.674 | 166,667 | – | 166,667 | – | – | – |
| 01 Jul 06 | 30 Jun 11 | $2.832 | 83,334 | – | – | 83,334(1) | – | – |
| 11 Sep 06 | 11 Sep 11 | $2.863 | 333,334 | – | – | – | 333,334 | 333,334 |
| 01 Dec 06 | 01 Dec 11 | $3.181 | 83,334 | – | – | – | 83,334 | 83,334 |
| 06 May 09(2) | 02 Mar 14 | $2.286 | 251,350 | – | – | – | 251,350 | – |
| 06 May 09(2) | 03 Apr 14 | $2.466 | 603,580 | – | – | 86,226(1) | 517,354 | – |
| 23 Sep 09(2) | 23 Sep 14 | $1.722 | 2,407,960 | – | – | 123,223(1) | 2,284,737 | – |
| Total | 3,929,559 | – | 166,667 | 292,783 | 3,470,109 | 416,668 | ||
| Weighted average exercise price | $2.02 | $1.67 | $2.26 | $2.02 | $2.93 |
(1) Expired on termination of employment with the Company.
(2) Vesting of options granted in May 2009 and September 2009 is subject to performance criteria as discussed below.
The weighted average remaining contractual life of share options outstanding at the end of the year was 2.2 years (2011: 2.8 years).
Fair value of options granted
There were no options granted during the year ending 30 June 2012.
Options are granted for no consideration. The vesting of options granted in 2010 is subject to a continuing services condition as at each vesting date, and relative Total Shareholder Returns over a three year period measured against a peer group. The Board reserves the right to make changes to the peer group to allow for changing circumstances (e.g. takeover) for peer group companies.
All options expire on the earlier of their expiry date, thirty days after resignation of the relevant executive or twelve months after retirement or retrenchment.
Options granted under the plan carry no dividend or voting rights. When exercisable, each option is convertible into one ordinary share.
The assessed fair value at grant date of options granted to the individuals is allocated equally over the period from grant date to vesting date. Fair values at grant date are independently determined using a Black Scholes option pricing model that takes into account the exercise price (ordinarily linked to the average closing market price for the 5 business days immediately preceding the grant date), the term of the option, the performance hurdle (relative Total Shareholder Return) the share price at grant date and expected price volatility of the underlying share, no expected dividend yield and the risk free interest rate for the term of the option.
At each balance date, an assessment is performed with regard to the probability of options vesting with respect to service conditions, and is subject to management judgement. Refer to Note 4 for further details.
82
Note 37 Share-based payments cont.
(B) EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE RIGHTS
Set out below are summaries of performance rights granted to employees under the St Barbara Limited Performance Rights Plan approved by shareholders:
Consolidated and parent entity – 2012
| Balance at | Granted | Exercised | Expired | Balance at | Exercisable | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| start of the | during the | during the | during the | end of the | at end of | |||
| Price on | year | year | year | year | year | the year | ||
| Grant Date | Expiry Date | issue date | Number | Number | Number | Number | Number | Number |
| 23 Dec 10 | 30 Jun 13 | $2.26 | 2,274,252 | – | – | 364,612(1) | 1,909,640 | – |
| 21 Jan 11 | 30 Jun 13 | $1.81 | 114,611 | – | – | – | 114,611 | – |
| 28 Oct 11 | 30 Jun 14 | $2.23 | – | 1,177,839 | 217,724(1) | 960,115 | – | |
| 23 Nov 11 | 30 Jun 14 | $2.20 | – | 459,621 | – | – | 459,621 | – |
| 15 Mar 12 | 30 Jun 14 | $2.09 | – | 243,496 | – | – | 243,496 | – |
| Total | 2,388,863 | 1,880,956 | – | 582,336 | 3,687,483 | – | ||
| Weighted average exercise price | – | – | – | – | – | – |
(1) Expired on termination of employment with the Company.
Consolidated and parent entity – 2011
| Balance at | Granted | Exercised | Expired | Balance at | Exercisable | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| start of the | during the | during the | during the | end of the | at end of | |||
| Price on | year | year | year | year | year | the year | ||
| Grant Date | Expiry Date | issue date | Number | Number | Number | Number | Number | Number |
| 23 Dec 10 | 30 Jun 13 | $2.26 | – | 2,412,992 | – | 138,740(1) | 2,274,252 | – |
| 21 Jan 11 | 30 Jun 13 | $1.81 | – | 114,611 | – | – | 114,611 | – |
| Total | – | 2,527,603 | – | 138,740 | 2,388,863 | – | ||
| Weighted average exercise price | – | – | – | – | – | – |
(1) Expired on termination of employment with the Company
The weighted average remaining contractual life of performance rights outstanding at the end of the year was 1.5 years (2011: 2.0 years).
The model inputs for rights granted during the year ended 30 June 2012 included:
-
i. Rights are granted for no consideration. The vesting of rights granted in 2012 is subject to a continuing service condition as at each vesting date, and relative Total Shareholder Returns over a three year period measured against a peer group.
-
ii. Performance rights do not have an exercise price
-
iii. Any performance right which does not vest will lapse
-
iv. Grant date varies with each issue.
The fair value of rights issued was adjusted according to estimates of the likelihood that the market conditions would be met. A Monte-Carlo simulation was performed using data at grant date to assist management in estimating the probability of the rights vesting. Refer Note 4 for further details.
As a result of the Monte-Carlo simulation results, the assessed fair value of rights issued during the year was $2,073,000. This outcome was based on the likelihood of the market condition being met as at the date the rights vest.
(C) EXPENSES ARISING FROM SHARE BASED PAYMENT TRANSACTIONS
Total expenses/(gains) arising from equity settled share based payment transactions recognised during the year as part of the employee benefit expenses were as follows:
| Consolidated | Consolidated |
|---|---|
| 2012 $’000 |
2011 $’000 |
| Options/performance rights issued/expired under employee option plan 904 |
624 |
Annual Report 2012 83
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements cont.
Note 38 Key Management Personnel Disclosures
(A) DIRECTORS
The following persons were Directors of St Barbara Limited during the financial year:
- S J C Wise
Chairman
- T J Lehany Managing Director & CEO • D W Bailey Non-executive director • E A Donaghey Non-executive director • P C Lockyer Non-executive director • R K Rae Non-executive director
(B) KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL DISCLOSURES
The following persons also had authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the activities of the Group, directly or indirectly, during the financial year:
-
Tim J Lehany
-
David Rose
Managing Director & CEO
Chief Operating Officer (resigned 31 January 2012)
-
Alistair Croll Chief Operating Officer (appointed 16 January 2012)
-
Garth Campbell-Cowan Chief Financial Officer
• Ross Kennedy Executive General Manager Corporate Services/Company Secretary • Phil Uttley Executive General Manager Discovery & Growth
(C) KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL COMPENSATION
| Consolidated | Consolidated |
|---|---|
| 2012 $’000 |
2011 $’000 |
| Short term employee benefits 4,207,826 Post employment benefits 78,522 Long Service Leave 104,216 Share-based payments 1,162,542 Termination payments 330,716 |
2,713,826 75,995 65,086 488,259 – |
| 5,883,822 | 3,343,166 |
(D) EQUITY INSTRUMENT DISCLOSURES RELATING TO KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL
(i) Options provided as remuneration and shares issued on exercise of such options
Details of options provided as remuneration and shares issued on the exercise of such options, together with terms and conditions of the options, are disclosed in Note 37.
(ii) Option holdings
The numbers of options over ordinary shares in the Company held during the financial year by each Director of St Barbara Limited and key management personnel of the Group, including their related parties, are set out below:
2012
| 2012 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granted | |||||||
| during the | Other | Vested and | |||||
| Balance at | year as | Exercised | Expired | changes | Balance at | exercisable | |
| the start of | compen- | during the | during the | during the | the end of | at the end | |
| Name | the year | sation | year | year | year | the year | of the year |
| Executive Director | |||||||
| T J Lehany | 1,227,570 | – | – | – | (251,350)(1) | 976,220 | – |
| Key management personnel | |||||||
| D Rose | 329,474 | – | – | – | (329,474)(2) | – | – |
| G Campbell-Cowan | 825,196 | – | – | (333,334) | (201,192)(1) | 290,670 | – |
| R Kennedy | 413,032 | – | – | – | (156,774)(1) | 256,258 | – |
| P Uttley | 256,258 | – | – | – | – | 256,258 | – |
(1) Options did not vest at 30 June 2012.
(2) Options expired upon termination of employment.
84
Note 38 Key Management Personnel Disclosures cont.
(D) EQUITY INSTRUMENT DISCLOSURES RELATING TO KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL cont.
(ii) Option holdings cont.
2011
| 2011 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granted | |||||||
| during the | Other | Vested and | |||||
| Balance at | year as | Exercised | Expired | changes | Balance at | exercisable | |
| the start of | compen- | during the | during the | during the | the end of | at the end | |
| Name | the year | sation | year | year | year | the year | of the year |
| Executive Director | |||||||
| T J Lehany | 1,227,570 | – | – | – | – | 1,227,570 | – |
| Key management personnel | |||||||
| D Rose | 329,474 | – | – | – | – | 329,474 | – |
| G Campbell-Cowan | 825,196 | – | – | – | – | 825,196 | 333,334 |
| R Kennedy | 413,032 | – | – | – | – | 413,032 | – |
| P Uttley | 256,258 | – | – | – | – | 256,258 | – |
(iii) Performance rights
The numbers of rights over ordinary shares in the Company held during the financial year by each Director of St Barbara Limited and key management personnel of the Group, including their related parties, are set out below:
2012
| 2012 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granted | ||||||
| during the | Other | Vested and | ||||
| Balance at | year as | Exercised | changes | Balance at | exercisable | |
| the start of | compen- | during the | during the | the end of | at the end | |
| Name | the year | sation | year | year | the year | of the year |
| Executive Director | ||||||
| T J Lehany | 757,819 | 459,621 | **– ** | – | 1,217,440 | – |
| Key management personnel | ||||||
| D Rose | 252,011 | 152,846 | – | (404,857)(1) | – | – |
| A Croll | – | 169,106 | – | – | 169,106 | – |
| G Campbell-Cowan | 225,737 | 146,472 | – | – | 372,209 | – |
| R Kennedy | 195,174 | 118,374 | – | – | 313,548 | – |
| P Uttley | 195,174 | 126,634 | – | – | 321,808 | – |
| (1) Performance rights expired upon termination of employment. | ||||||
| 2011 |
| 2011 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granted | ||||||
| during the | Other | Vested and | ||||
| Balance at | year as | Exercised | changes | Balance at | exercisable | |
| the start of | compen- | during the | during the | the end of | at the end | |
| Name | the year | sation | year | year | the year | of the year |
| Executive Director | ||||||
| T J Lehany | – | 757,819 | – | – | 757,819 | – |
| Key management personnel | ||||||
| D Rose | – | 252,011 | – | – | 252,011 | – |
| G Campbell-Cowan | – | 225,737 | – | – | 225,737 | – |
| R Kennedy | – | 195,174 | – | – | 195,174 | – |
| P Uttley | – | 195,174 | – | – | 195,174 | – |
Annual Report 2012 85
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements cont.
Note 38 Key Management Personnel Disclosures cont.
(D) EQUITY INSTRUMENT DISCLOSURES RELATING TO KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL cont.
(iv) Share holdings
The numbers of shares in the Company held during the year by each Director of St Barbara Limited and key management personnel of the Group, including their related parties, are set out below. There were no shares granted during the year as compensation.
| 2012 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance at the | ||||||
| start of the | Exercise of | Balance at the | ||||
| Name | year | options | Other changes | Purchased | Sold | end of the year |
| Directors | ||||||
| S J C Wise | 1,139,389 | – | – | – | – | 1,139,389 |
| T J Lehany | 167,822 | – | – | – | – | 167,822 |
| D W Bailey | 30,247 | – | – | – | – | 30,247 |
| E A Donaghey | – | – | – | 40,000 | – | 40,000 |
| P C Lockyer | 20,631 | – | – | – | – | 20,631 |
| R K Rae | 48,976 | – | – | – | – | 48,976 |
| Key management personnel | ||||||
| A Croll | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| G Campbell-Cowan | – | – | – | 15,000 | – | 15,000 |
| R Kennedy | 65,218 | – | – | 9,000 | – | 74,218 |
| P Uttley | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 2011 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance at the | ||||||
| start of the | Exercise of | Balance at the | ||||
| Name | year | options | Other changes | Purchased | Sold | end of the year |
| Directors | ||||||
| S J C Wise | 1,139,389 | – | – | – | – | 1,139,389 |
| T J Lehany | 167,822 | – | – | – | – | 167,822 |
| D W Bailey | 30,247 | – | – | – | – | 30,247 |
| E A Donaghey | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| P C Lockyer | 10,631 | – | – | 10,000 | – | 20,631 |
| R K Rae | 42,310 | – | – | 6,666 | – | 48,976 |
| Key management personnel | ||||||
| D Rose | 23,334 | – | – | – | – | 23,334 |
| G Campbell-Cowan | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| R Kennedy | 70,885 | – | – | 11,000 | (16,667) | 65,218 |
| P Uttley | – | – | – | – | – | – |
86
-
1 In the opinion of the directors of St Barbara Limited (the Company):
-
(a) the financial statements and notes that are contained in pages 42 to 86 and the Remuneration report in the Directors’ report, set out on pages 29 to 39, are in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001 , including:
-
(i) giving a true and fair view of the Group’s financial position as at 30 June 2012 and of its performance for the financial year ended on that date; and
-
(ii) complying with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Regulations 2001 ; and
-
-
(b) there are reasonable grounds to believe that the Company will be able to pay its debts as and when they become due and payable.
-
2 The directors have been given the declarations required by Section 295A of the Corporations Act 2001 from the chief executive officer and chief financial officer for the financial year ended 30 June 2012.
-
3 The directors draw attention to Note 1(a) to the financial statements, which includes a statement of compliance with International Financial Reporting Standards.
Signed in accordance with a resolution of the directors:
==> picture [90 x 70] intentionally omitted <==
Timothy J Lehany
Managing Director and CEO Melbourne
23 August 2012
Annual Report 2012 87
Independent auditor’s report to the members of St Barbara Limited
Report on the financial report
We have audited the accompanying financial report of St Barbara Limited (the Company), which comprises the consolidated statement of financial position as at 30 June 2012, and consolidated income statement and consolidated statement of comprehensive income, consolidated statement of changes in equity and consolidated cash flow statement for the year ended on that date, notes 1 to 38 comprising a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information and the directors’ declaration of the Group comprising the Company and the entities it controlled at the year’s end or from time to time during the financial year.
Directors’ responsibility for the financial report
The directors of the company are responsible for the preparation of the financial report that gives a true and fair view in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Act 2001 and for such internal control as the directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of the financial report that is free from material misstatement whether due to fraud or error. In note 1(a), the directors also state, in accordance with Australian Accounting Standard AASB 101 Presentation of Financial Statements , that the financial statements of the Group comply with International Financial Reporting Standards.
Auditor’s responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial report based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards. These Auditing Standards require that we comply with relevant ethical requirements relating to audit engagements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial report is free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial report. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgement, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial report, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation of the financial report that gives a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control . An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by the directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial report.
We performed the procedures to assess whether in all material respects the financial report presents fairly, in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001 and Australian Accounting Standards, a true and fair view which is consistent with our understanding of the Group’s financial position and of its performance.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
==> picture [35 x 709] intentionally omitted <==
88
Independence
In conducting our audit, we have complied with the independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 .
Auditor’s opinion In our opinion:
(a) the financial report of the Group is in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001 , including:
(i) giving a true and fair view of the Group’s financial position as at 30 June 2012 and of its performance for the year ended on that date; and (ii) complying with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Regulations 2001.
(b) the financial report also complies with International Financial Reporting Standards as disclosed in note 1(a).
Report on the remuneration report
We have audited the Remuneration Report included in pages 29 to 39 of the directors’ report for the year ended 30 June 2012. The directors of the company are responsible for the preparation and presentation of the remuneration report in accordance with Section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001 . Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the remuneration report, based on our audit conducted in accordance with auditing standards.
Auditor’s opinion
In our opinion, the remuneration report of St Barbara Limited for the year ended 30 June 2012, complies with Section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001 .
KPMG
==> picture [103 x 47] intentionally omitted <==
Tony Romeo Partner
Melbourne 23 August 2012
==> picture [35 x 709] intentionally omitted <==
Annual Report 2012 89
Twenty Largest Shareholders ORDINARY FULLY PAID SHARES AS AT 30 SEPTEMBER 2012
| Rank Name |
Units % of Units |
|---|---|
| 1. NATIONAL NOMINEES LIMITED 2. HSBC CUSTODY NOMINEES (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED 3. J P MORGAN NOMINEES AUSTRALIA LIMITED 4. JP MORGAN NOMINEES AUSTRALIA LIMITED 5. CITICORP NOMINEES PTY LIMITED 6. CS FOURTH NOMINEES PTY LTD 7. MERRILL LYNCH (AUSTRALIA) NOMINEES PTY LIMITED 8. JAYVEE & CO 9. HSBC CUSTODY NOMINEES (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED 10. HSBC GLOBAL CUSTODY NOMINEE (UK) LIMITED <357206 A/C> 11. AMP LIFE LIMITED 12. JAYVEE & CO 13. WOODROSS NOMINEES PTY LTD 14. BNP PARIBAS NOMS PTY LTD 15. BNY MELLON NOMINEES LIMITED 16. HSBC CUSTODY NOMINEES (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED – A/C 3 17. QIC LIMITED 18. CHASE NOMINEES LIMITED 19. CITICORP NOMINEES PTY LIMITED 20. THE BANK OF NEW YORK (NOMINEES) LIMITED |
125,332,542 25.7 98,229,260 20.1 87,364,962 17.9 19,849,181 4.1 12,213,512 2.5 7,559,882 1.6 6,043,922 1.2 6,000,000 1.2 4,260,666 0.9 3,737,032 0.8 3,429,641 0.7 2,697,332 0.6 2,549,932 0.5 2,476,814 0.5 2,425,947 0.5 2,159,994 0.4 2,076,361 0.4 2,029,387 0.4 2,010,414 0.4 1,966,434 0.4 |
| Total Top 20 holders of ordinary fully paid shares | 394,413,215 80.8 |
| Total Remaining Holders Balance | 93,660,862 19.2 |
Substantial Shareholders
ORDINARY FULLY PAID SHARES AS AT 14 SEPTEMBER 2012
| Name | Shares | % of Shares |
|---|---|---|
| M&G Investment Management Ltd | 91,284,142 | 18.7 |
| Franklin Resources Inc | 36,215,568 | 7.4 |
| Van Eck Associates Corporation | 26,054,948 | 5.3 |
90
Distribution of Shareholdings ORDINARY FULLY PAID SHARES AS AT 30 SEPTEMBER 2012
| % of Issued | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Range | Total holders | Shares | Capital |
| 1 – 1,000 | 4,119 | 1,783,997 | 0.0 |
| 1,001 – 5,000 | 4,341 | 10,744,140 | 0.2 |
| 5,001 – 10,000 | 1,078 | 7,990,888 | 0.2 |
| 10,001 – 100,000 | 1,000 | 27,565,005 | 0.5 |
| 100,001 and over | 162 | 439,990,047 | 90.1 |
| Total | 10,700 | 488,074,077 | 100.0 |
UNMARKETABLE PARCELS
| Minimum | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parcel Size | Holders | Shares | |||
| Minimum $500 | parcel at $2.16 | per unit | 232 | 1,268 | 109,345 |
Annual Report 2012 91
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
S J C Wise Chairman T J Lehany Managing Director & CEO D W Bailey Non-Executive Director E A Donaghey Non-Executive Director P C Lockyer Non-Executive Director R K Rae Non-Executive Director
COMPANY SECRETARY
R J Kennedy
BANKER
National Australia Bank 500 Bourke Street Melbourne VIC 3000
AUDITOR
KPMG 147 Collins Street Melbourne VIC 3000
SOLICITOR
Ashurst 181 William Street Melbourne VIC 3000
REGISTERED OFFICE
Level 10, 432 St Kilda Road Melbourne Victoria 3004 Telephone: +61 3 8660 1900 Facsimile: +61 3 8660 1999 Email: [email protected] Website: www.stbarbara.com.au
STOCK EXCHANGE LISTING
Shares in St Barbara Limited are quoted on the Australian Securities Exchange Ticker Symbol: SBM
SHARE REGISTRY
Computershare Limited GPO Box 2975 Melbourne Victoria 3001 Telephone (within Australia): 1300 653 935 Telephone (international): +61 3 9415 4356 Facsimile: +61 3 9473 2500
92
www.colliercreative.com.au #STB0001
This report is printed on Monza Satin produced with 55% recycled fi bre (25% post consumer and 30% pre consumer) and FSC[®] Certifi ed pulp, which ensures that all virgin pulp is derived from well-managed forests, and is manufactured by an ISO 14001 certifi ed mill. Monza Recycled is an FSC[®] Mixed Source Certifi ed Paper.
==> picture [18 x 22] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [14 x 24] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [21 x 20] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [23 x 18] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [91 x 32] intentionally omitted <==
ABN 36 009 165 066
www.stbarbara.com.au
==> picture [143 x 45] intentionally omitted <==
ABN 36 009 165 066
Notice of 2012 Annual General Meeting
The 2012 Annual General Meeting of St Barbara Limited will be held:
Date: Thursday, 22 November 2012
Time: 11:00am Venue: State Library of Victoria Conference Centre Entry 3 in La Trobe Street between Russell and Swanston Streets Melbourne Victoria 3000
Meeting Documentation including:
-
Notice of Annual General Meeting
-
Explanatory Memorandum
-
Proxy Form
The Directors recommend that you vote in favour of all the resolutions to be considered at the Annual General Meeting.
Level 10, 432 St Kilda Road, Melbourne VIC 3004 Locked Bag 9, Collins Street East VIC 8003 TELEPHONE + 61 3 8660 1900 FACSIMILE + 61 3 8660 1999
==> picture [143 x 45] intentionally omitted <==
ABN 36 009 165 066
18 October 2012
Dear Shareholder
Annual General Meeting
I am pleased to invite you to the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders of St Barbara Limited. The meeting will be held on Thursday 22 November 2012 at 11:00am (Melbourne time) in the State Library of Victoria Conference Centre, Entry 3 in La Trobe Street between Russell and Swanston Streets, Melbourne . I hope you will be able to attend.
The business of the meeting is set out in the enclosed Notice of Annual General Meeting. Details and the background for each item of business are set out in the accompanying Explanatory Memorandum. Please read this information carefully.
The St Barbara Board recommends that you vote in favour of each resolution to be considered at the meeting.
If you are not able to personally attend the meeting, details of how you can vote are set out in the enclosed Proxy Form. To be valid, Proxy Forms must be received at the designated address by no later than 11:00am (Melbourne time) on Tuesday 20 November 2012.
I encourage you to read the 2012 Annual Report. Updates on our progress are also regularly posted on the Company's website: www.stbarbara.com.au.
Thank you for your continuing support of St Barbara.
Yours sincerely
==> picture [155 x 65] intentionally omitted <==
Colin Wise Chairman
Level 10, 432 St Kilda Road, Melbourne VIC 3004 Locked Bag 9, Collins Street East VIC 8003
TELEPHONE + 61 3 8660 1900 FACSIMILE + 61 3 8660 1999
| Contents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Page | ||
| Important Notices | 4 | |
| Key Dates | 4 | |
| What You Should Do | 4 | |
| Notice of Annual General Meeting | 5 | |
| Explanatory | Memorandum to Shareholders | 9 |
| 1 | Annual Reports | 9 |
| 2. | Resolution 1 – Adoption of Remuneration Report | 9 |
| 3. | Resolution 2 – Re‐election of Director – Mr Saul Jonathan Colin | 11 |
| Wise | ||
| 4. | Resolution 3 – Re‐election of Director – Mr Phillip Clive Lockyer | 11 |
| 5. | Resolution 4 – Increase in Non Executive Directors’ fee cap | 12 |
| 6. | Resolution 5 – Approval of the issue of performance rights to Mr | 12 |
| Timothy James Lehany, Managing Director and Chief Executive | ||
| Officer | ||
| 7. | Resolution 6 – Approval of financial assistance by certain Allied Gold | 14 |
| Mining Limited subsidiaries in connection with the acquisition of | ||
| Allied Gold Mining Limited | ||
| 8. | Definitions | 17 |
| Schedule – Performance rights – Further details | 18 | |
| Proxy Form |
Important Notices
A copy of this document has been lodged with ASX. ASX and its officers take no responsibility for the contents of this document.
Certain capitalised terms used in this document are defined in section 8 of the Explanatory Memorandum.
Key Dates
| Deadline for receipt of Proxy Forms Date and time for determining eligibility to vote Date and time of Annual General Meeting |
Tuesday 20 November 2012 at 11:00am (Melbourne time) Tuesday 20 November 2012 at 7:00pm (Melbourne time) Thursday 22 November 2012 at 11:00am (Melbourne time) |
|---|---|
What You Should Do
Step 1 ‐ Read this Meeting Documentation
This is an important document. This Meeting Documentation sets out the business of the Meeting. Please read this document carefully and, if you are not sure what to do, please consult your legal or financial adviser immediately.
Step 2 ‐ Vote on the Resolutions
Your vote is important.
If you are unable to attend the meeting in person, please complete the Proxy Form that accompanies this Meeting Documentation and return it in the reply paid envelope to the Company’s share registry, Computershare, before 20 November 2012 at 11:00am (Melbourne time). Proxy Forms received after this time will not be effective for the scheduled commencement of the Annual General Meeting.
For details on how to complete and lodge the Proxy Form, please refer to the instructions on the Proxy Form.
If you wish to appoint a proxy, the Board recommends you mark the “FOR” box for each of the resolutions set out in the enclosed Proxy Form.
Questions
If you have any questions about any matter contained in this Meeting Documentation, please contact Mr Ross Kennedy, Company Secretary, on +61 3 8660 1900.
page 4
St Barbara Limited
ABN 36 009 165 066
Notice of Annual General Meeting
Notice is given that the 2012 Annual General Meeting of the Company will be held on Thursday 22 November 2012 at 11:00am (Melbourne time) in the State Library of Victoria Conference Centre, Entry 3 in La Trobe Street between Russell and Swanston Streets, Melbourne.
Agenda
Ordinary business
1. Annual Reports
To receive and consider the Annual Financial Report of the Company and the reports of the Directors and Auditor for the year ended 30 June 2012.
2. Resolution 1 – Adoption of Remuneration Report
To consider and, if thought fit, pass the following as an ordinary resolution:
“That the Remuneration Report for the year ended 30 June 2012 as set out on pages 29 to 39 (inclusive) of the Annual Report be adopted.”
Note – the vote on this resolution is advisory only and does not bind the Directors or the Company.
3. Resolution 2 – Re‐election of Director – Mr Saul Jonathan Colin Wise
To consider and, if thought fit, pass the following as an ordinary resolution:
“That Mr Saul Jonathan Colin Wise, being a Director of the Company who retires pursuant to article 6.3 of the Company’s Constitution, and being eligible, is re‐elected as a Director of the Company.”
4. Resolution 3 – Re‐election of Director – Mr Phillip Clive Lockyer
To consider and, if thought fit, pass the following as an ordinary resolution:
“That Mr Phillip Clive Lockyer, being a Director of the Company who retires pursuant to article 6.3 of the Company’s Constitution, and being eligible, is re‐elected as a Director of the Company.”
Special business
5. Resolution 4 – Increase in Non Executive Directors' Fee Cap
To consider and, if thought fit, pass the following as an ordinary resolution:
“That, for the purposes of article 6.5(a) of the Company's Constitution and ASX Listing Rule 10.17, the maximum total amount of Directors' fees payable to Non Executive Directors of the Company (inclusive of superannuation contributions made for the benefit of non executive directors) be increased by $450,000 from $750,000 to $1,200,000 per annum.”
page 5
6. Resolution 5 – Approval of issue of performance rights to Mr Timothy James Lehany, Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer
To consider and, if thought fit, pass the following as an ordinary resolution:
“That, for the purposes of Listing Rule 10.14, sections 200B and 200E of the Corporations Act and for all other purposes, in part consideration of his employment as Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of the Company in respect of the current 2013 financial year, Mr Timothy James Lehany be issued 438,182 performance rights to acquire ordinary shares in the capital of the Company, on the terms and conditions set out, and approval be given to give Mr Lehany the termination benefits described, in the Explanatory Memorandum accompanying the Notice convening this Annual General Meeting.”
7. Resolution 6 – Approval of financial assistance provided by Allied Gold Mining Limited’s Australian subsidiaries
To consider, and if thought fit, pass the following as a special resolution:
"That under section 260B(2) of the Corporations Act, approval is given for the financial assistance to be provided by Allied Gold Limited ACN 104 855 067, Allied Gold Finance Pty Ltd ACN 141 429 969, Australian Solomons Gold Limited ACN 109 492 373, JV Mine (Australia) Pty Ltd ACN 096 760 495, Solomons Island International Pty Ltd ACN 009 804 862 and Allied Tabar Exploration Pty Ltd ACN 119 883 911 in connection with the Acquisition by the Company of all issued and to be issued ordinary shares in Allied Gold Mining Limited, as described in item 7 of the Explanatory Memorandum accompanying the Notice of Annual General Meeting."
Explanatory Memorandum
We recommend that you read the Explanatory Memorandum accompanying and forming part of this Notice of Annual General Meeting.
Entitlement to Vote
- Snapshot Date
For the purposes of the Annual General Meeting (including voting at the Annual General Meeting), Shareholders are those persons who are the registered holders of Shares as at 20 November 2012 at 7:00pm (Melbourne time).
- Voting Restrictions
Resolution 1: Adoption of the Remuneration Report
The Remuneration Report identifies the Company's Key Management Personnel for the financial year to 30 June 2012.
Under the Corporations Act, Key Management Personnel (including Directors) of the Company details of whose remuneration are included in the Remuneration Report, and their closely related parties (as defined in the Corporations Act), (each a Restricted Person ), are prohibited from voting on Resolution 1 in any capacity (eg. as a shareholder, proxy, attorney or corporate representative).
However, the prohibition does not apply if:
- a Restricted Person is appointed as a proxy for a Shareholder entitled to vote and the proxy appointment specifies the way the Restricted Person is to vote on the resolution; or
page 6
-
the Chairman has been appointed as a proxy for a Shareholder entitled to vote and the proxy appointment:
-
does not specify the way the Chairman is to vote on the resolution; and
-
expressly authorises the Chairman to exercise the proxy (notwithstanding that Resolution 1 is connected directly or indirectly with the remuneration of Key Management Personnel).
The Chairman intends to vote undirected proxies (where the Chairman has been appropriately authorised) in favour of Resolution 1.
Other Directors and other Key Management Personnel of the Company and their closely related parties must not cast any votes in respect of Resolution 1 that arise from any undirected proxy that they hold.
Resolution 4 (Increase in Non Executive Directors’ fee cap) and Resolution 5 (Issue of Performance rights to Mr Timothy Lehany)
In accordance with the ASX Listing Rules, the Company will disregard any votes cast on Resolution 4 by each Director and their associates and on Resolution 5 by Mr Lehany and his associates, other than where the vote:
-
is cast by a person as proxy for a Shareholder who is entitled to vote, in accordance with the directions on the Proxy Form; or
-
is cast by the Chairman as proxy for a Shareholder who is entitled to vote, in accordance with a direction on the Proxy Form to vote as the proxy decides.
Further, under the Corporations Act, the Company's Key Management Personnel and their closely related parties are prohibited from voting on resolutions connected directly or indirectly with the remuneration of Key Management Personnel (such as Resolutions 4 and 5) as a proxy for a Shareholder entitled to vote where the proxy appointment does not specify the way the proxy is to vote on the resolution.
However, this Corporations Act prohibition does not apply if the Chairman has been appointed as the proxy and the proxy appointment expressly authorises the Chairman to exercise an undirected proxy.
The Chairman intends to vote undirected proxies (where the Chairman has been appropriately authorised) in favour of Resolutions 4 and 5.
For the purposes of the ASX Listing Rules and pursuant to section 200E (2A) of the Corporations Act, the Company will disregard any votes cast on Resolution 5 by Mr Lehany and his associates, other than where the vote is cast by Mr Lehany or his associates as a proxy for a Shareholder who is entitled to vote and in accordance with the directions how to vote on the Proxy Form.
page 7
Proxy Information
If you are entitled to attend the meeting and vote, you may appoint a proxy to attend and vote instead of you. A proxy need not be a Shareholder and can be either an individual or a body corporate.
If you appoint a body corporate as a proxy, that body corporate will need to ensure that it:
-
appoints an individual as its corporate representative to exercise its powers at the meeting, in accordance with section 250D of the Corporations Act; and
-
provides satisfactory evidence of the appointment of its corporate representative prior to commencement of the meeting.
If such evidence is not received before the meeting, then the body corporate (through its representative) will not be permitted to act as a proxy.
If you are entitled to cast 2 or more votes, you may appoint 2 proxies and may specify the proportion or number of votes each proxy is appointed to exercise. If no proportion or number is specified, each proxy will exercise half of your votes.
A Proxy Form accompanies this Notice of Annual General Meeting and to be effective it, and any authority under which the Proxy Form is signed, must be received at St Barbara’s share registry at:
St Barbara Limited Share Registry
C/‐ Computershare Investor Services Pty Limited
GPO Box 242 Melbourne, Victoria, 3001
OR
by facsimile: 1800 783 447 (within Australia), +61 3 9473 2555 (outside Australia)
by no later than 20 November 2012 at 11:00am (Melbourne time).
For intermediary online subscribers only (custodians) please visit www.intermediaryonline.com.
By Order of the Board
Dated: 18 October 2012
==> picture [120 x 48] intentionally omitted <==
Ross Kennedy Company Secretary
page 8
St Barbara Limited
ABN 36 009 165 066
Explanatory Memorandum to Shareholders
This Explanatory Memorandum has been prepared to assist Shareholders to understand the business to be put to Shareholders at the forthcoming Annual General Meeting on 22 November 2012.
Ordinary Business
1 Annual Reports
The Corporations Act requires:
-
the reports of the Directors and Auditor; and
-
the Annual Financial Report, including the financial statements of the Company for the year ended 30 June 2012,
to be laid before the Annual General Meeting. The Corporations Act does not require a vote of Shareholders on the reports or statements. However, Shareholders will be able to ask questions at the meeting in relation to the reports.
Also, a reasonable opportunity will be given to Shareholders to ask the Company’s Auditor for the year ended 30 June 2012, Mr Tony Romeo, Partner, KPMG, questions relevant to the conduct of the audit, the preparation and content of the Auditor’s report, the accounting policies adopted by the Company in relation to the preparation of the financial statements and the independence of the Auditor in relation to the conduct of the audit.
2 Resolution 1 – Adoption of Remuneration Report
The Remuneration Report details the Company’s remuneration policy and remuneration details for Non Executive Directors, the Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer and senior executives. The Remuneration Report is set out on pages 29 to 39 (inclusive) of the 2012 Annual Report, and is available on the St Barbara website (http://www.stbarbara.com.au).
The Remuneration Report is required to be considered for adoption in accordance with section 250R of the Corporations Act.
The vote on this resolution is advisory only and does not bind the Directors of the Company.
Key remuneration principles set out in the Report are summarised below.
The Company’s remuneration strategy recognises that it needs to attract, reward and retain high calibre, high performing, and team orientated individuals capable of delivering and being incentivised to deliver the Company Strategy. The remuneration policy and related employment policies and practices are aligned with this strategy.
The Company operates a performance based remuneration system through which the remuneration of Executive Key Management Personnel is linked to the financial and non‐financial performance of the Company and its share price.
Under the remuneration system the amount of at risk remuneration relative to an employee’s total remuneration increases in line with the seniority of the role of that employee. This reinforces the linkage between personal and company performance and achievement of the Company’s business strategy and creation of shareholder wealth.
Non Executive Directors’ fees are reviewed annually by the Board to ensure fees are appropriate to reflect the responsibilities and time commitments required of Non Executive Directors and to ensure that the Company continues to attract and retain non executive directors of a high calibre.
page 9
The Board seeks the advice of, and is guided by, specialist independent remuneration consultants in this process. Currently Non Executive Directors’ fees are targeted between the median and the 75[th] percentile of comparatively sized companies.
In order to maintain their independence and impartiality, the fees paid to Non Executive Directors are not linked to the performance of the Company. Non Executive Directors have no involvement in the day to day management of the Company.
The reward structures for the Company’s executives are strongly aligned with shareholders’ interests by:
-
recognising the contribution of each senior executive to the achievement of the Company’s strategy and business objectives;
-
rewarding high individual performance;
-
being market competitive to attract and retain high calibre individuals; and
-
ensuring that equity based remuneration through the long term incentive plan is based on achieving superior total shareholder returns ( TSR ) over a three year period.
To achieve these objectives, remuneration for executives is comprised of fixed remuneration and variable or at risk remuneration. The “at risk” component is comprised of separate short term and long term incentives in which the former are linked to specific personal and corporate / business unit objectives and the latter are linked to medium term strategic corporate objectives. Both provide a direct connection between achievement of targets which drive Company performance and shareholder wealth, with personal remuneration. The mix of fixed and at risk remuneration varies according to the role of each executive, with the highest level of at risk remuneration applied to those roles that have the greatest potential to influence and deliver Company outcomes and drive shareholder wealth.
Total Fixed Remuneration for each executive role is benchmarked against the 75[th] percentile of prevailing comparable market rates, to ensure that the Company is able to attract and retain a talented and capable workforce appropriate to meet its current and anticipated needs .
The short term incentive ( STI ) is an annual “at risk” component of remuneration for senior executives. It is payable based on performance against key performance indicators ( KPIs ) set at the beginning of the financial year. STIs are structured to remunerate senior executives for achieving annual Company targets as well as their own individual performance targets. Company and individual targets are established by reference to the Company Strategy. The net amount of any STI after allowing for applicable taxation, is payable in cash.
For each KPI there are defined “threshold”, target” and “stretch” measures which are capable of objective assessment.
Threshold performance typically requires achievement of the full year budget for quantifiable measures such as safety, profitability, cash generation, as well as the achievement of criteria set as near term goals linked to the annual strategy review.
Target performance represents challenging but achievable levels of performance beyond achievement of budget measures. For example, the net profit after tax ( NPAT ) STI was set at 10% above budgeted normalised NPAT for the year, where NPAT is adjusted for movements in the gold price to budgeted levels. Stretch performance requires significant performance above and beyond normal expectations and if achieved is anticipated to result in a substantial improvement in key strategic outcomes, operational or financial results, and / or the business performance of the Company.
Long term incentives ( LTIs ) are structured to reward executives for the long term performance of the Company relative to its peers and, commencing with the 2011 financial year, were granted in the form of performance rights. Previously, LTIs were granted in the form of unlisted employee options.
page 10
In considering the LTI awards for the 2012 financial year, the Board considered the trend towards deferring a portion of the award. Unlike other industries where matching revenues and expenses may have long lead times, the gold industry is such that gold produced is sold at arm’s length within a matter of days from production. Revenue and expenses are then recorded. The industry characteristics supporting a look back testing of prior year performance awards do not carry the same weight in our industry.
The vesting of performance rights granted in respect of the 2012 financial year is subject to continuing employment as at the vesting date, and the Company achieving a relative total shareholder return ( Relative TSR ) at the 50[th] percentile or better, for the period from the performance rights pricing date to 30 June 2014.
Over the last two years there have been a number of takeovers and mergers of ASX listed gold companies. The Board of the Company therefore considers it appropriate that multiple performance vesting conditions apply in relation to performance rights to be issued in respect of the 2013 financial year and subsequent financial years. Such performance vesting conditions are intended to be linked to the Company’s strategic plan.
For the 2013 financial year, the performance vesting conditions will comprise Relative TSR, an increase in Ore Reserves net of production and the return on capital employed ( ROCE ). Further information on such performance vesting conditions is contained in the attached Schedule.
The Company achieved outstanding results for the 2012 financial year, including a 90% increase in NPAT (and excluding significant items) to $130 million.
The Board unanimously recommends that Shareholders vote in favour of this resolution.
3 Resolution 2 – Re‐election of Director – Mr Saul Jonathan Colin Wise
Mr Wise is an experienced corporate lawyer, consultant and company director with significant expertise in the mining and exploration industry and resources, energy and corporate sectors. He spent 24 years with WMC Limited, ten of which as General Counsel and subsequently, four years as Counsel to a New York law firm. He has extensive practical experience in Australia and internationally with a wide range of corporate, operational and legal matters.
He has been Chairman of St Barbara since mid 2004 and is a Fellow of both the Australian Institute of Company Directors and the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Until recently he was a member of the Advisory Board to the Dean of Medicine, Nursing & Health at Monash University and was a non executive director for 5 years of Southern Health, the largest health care service in Victoria, Chair of its Quality Committee, and a member of the Audit Committee.
The Board, with Mr Wise abstaining, unanimously recommends that Shareholders vote in favour of this resolution.
4 Resolution 3 – Re‐election of Director – Mr Phillip Clive Lockyer
Mr Lockyer was appointed as a Non Executive Director on 19 December 2006 and re‐elected on 19 November 2009. Mr Lockyer is an experienced mining engineer and metallurgist with over 40 years experience in the mineral industry with an emphasis on gold and nickel, in both underground and open pit operations. Mr Lockyer was employed by WMC Resources for 20 years and as General Manager for WA was responsible for that Company’s nickel division and gold operations. Mr Lockyer also held the position of Director Operations for Dominion Mining Limited and Resolute Limited.
The Board, with Mr Lockyer abstaining, unanimously recommends that Shareholders vote in favour of this resolution.
page 11
Special Business
- 5 Resolution 4 – Increase in Non Executive Directors’ fee cap
Under Listing Rule 10.17, the Company is not permitted to increase the aggregate amount of fees payable to Non Executive Directors without the prior approval of Shareholders.
At present, the maximum aggregate amount of fees that the Company can pay to its Non Executive Directors is $750,000. This level was approved seven years ago at the 2005 AGM.
The Company’s recent acquisition of Allied Gold Mining plc has significantly expanded its operations, including entry into international regions, and increased the demands on the Directors. It is possible that the Board will consider it necessary or appropriate to recruit one or more additional Non Executive Directors in the future in order to exercise the appropriate level of oversight of the Company’s affairs on behalf of Shareholders.
The proposed new maximum aggregate amount allows the Company to accommodate any future increase in the number of Directors, should this be considered appropriate. It is emphasised that this is a maximum limit and the Board does not intend to immediately increase the size of the Board, nor to increase the current fee level of Non Executive Directors beyond the aggregate level set in 2005. The proposed new maximum aggregate amount will also enable the Company to remain competitive and in line with prevailing market forces from time to time in attracting and retaining Non Executive Directors with the appropriate qualifications and experience.
Fees payable to current Non Executive Directors for the 2013 financial year will not exceed the current approved maximum aggregate of fees of $750,000.
6 Resolution 5 – Approval of issue of performance rights to Mr Timothy James Lehany, Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer
Introduction
The Board has resolved, subject to Shareholder approval, to issue Mr Lehany, Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer, performance rights pursuant to the Performance Rights Plan ( PRP ) to acquire Shares in the capital of the Company, in the quantum and on the terms which are set out below.
-
The number of performance rights to be issued in respect of the 2013 financial year is 438,182.
-
The issue of the performance rights is subject to the terms of the PRP, details of which were approved by Shareholders in 2010.
-
No cash consideration is payable for the issue of the performance rights.
-
The performance rights will vest subject to prescribed service and performance conditions being met. The number of performance rights vesting will be subject to the Company’s relative performance for each of the performance conditions.
-
The service condition requires continuous employment for a three year period commencing on 1 July 2012. The Board has discretion in circumstances of death, disability or bona fide redundancy to vary the service condition and reduce the number of performance rights proportionately for a period of service of less than three years.
-
The performance conditions comprise the following:
-
a. a condition based on Relative TSR;
-
b. a condition based on the Company's increase in Ore Reserves net of production; and
-
c. a condition based on the ROCE by the Company,
-
page 12
each of which is calculated over the three year period commencing 1 July 2012.
-
Subject to the satisfaction of the service and performance conditions, Mr Lehany will receive one Share in the Company for each performance right granted. Any performance right which does not vest will lapse.
-
The performance rights will not be listed on ASX and will not be transferable, except as permitted under the PRP.
The performance rights represent the LTI component of Mr Lehany’s total remuneration in respect of the 2013 financial year. Details of Mr Lehany’s remuneration for the previous financial year are contained in the 2012 Annual Report. Details of the peer comparator group against which Relative TSR will be measured appear in the attached Schedule.
Shareholder approval
Shareholder approval of the issue of performance rights to Mr Lehany is sought for all purposes under the Corporations Act and the ASX Listing Rules, including for the following purposes:
-
Under Listing Rule 10.14, the acquisition of securities by a director under an employee incentive scheme requires shareholder approval. Shareholder approval is therefore sought for the acquisition by Mr Lehany of performance rights and Shares upon vesting of performance rights.
-
Under section 200B of the Corporations Act, a company may only give a person a benefit in connection with their ceasing to hold a managerial or executive office in the company or a related body corporate if it is approved by shareholders or an exemption applies. Section 200B of the Corporations Act applies to managerial or executive officers of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, which includes Mr Lehany. The term ‘benefit’ has a wide operation and includes the early vesting of the performance rights under the rules of the PRP.
-
It is proposed, therefore, that Resolution 5 will also approve, under section 200E of the Corporations Act, any ‘termination benefit’ that may be provided to Mr Lehany under the PRP in relation to the performance rights to be granted to him, in addition to any other termination benefits that may be provided to Mr Lehany under the Corporations Act. The termination benefit that may be given under the PRP is the early vesting of the performance rights if Mr Lehany ceases employment with the Company due to death, disability, bona fide redundancy or other reason with the approval of the Board.
The value of such benefits cannot presently be ascertained but matters, events and circumstances that will, or are likely to, affect the calculation of that value include:
-
the number of performance rights held by the Mr Lehany prior to cessation of employment;
-
the number of performance rights that vest; and
-
the market price of Shares on ASX on the last ASX trading day before the date of calculation.
Disclosures made for the purposes of Listing Rule 10.15:
In accordance with Listing Rule 10.15, the Company notes that:
-
the maximum number of securities that can be awarded to Mr Lehany if this resolution is approved is 438, 182;
-
the price payable on the issue or exercise of each performance right is nil;
-
Mr Lehany was granted 757,819 performance rights under the PRP on 23 December 2010 in accordance with Shareholder approval obtained at the Company's Annual General Meeting held on 18 November 2010 and 459,621 performance rights under the PRP on 23 November 2011 in accordance with Shareholder approval obtained at the Company’s Annual General Meeting held on 17 November 2011;
page 13
-
Mr Lehany is the only Director entitled to participate in the PRP because he is the only Executive Director and the Company has not declared any Non Executive Director as being eligible to participate in the PRP;
-
aside from the issue of performance rights to Mr Lehany on 23 December 2010 and 23 November 2011, there have not been any grants made to any Director or associate of a Director under the PRP since Shareholder approval was last obtained on 18 November 2010;
-
there is no loan proposed in relation to the proposed award of performance rights to Mr Lehany; and
-
Mr Lehany’s performance rights are intended to be granted by 31 December 2012 and in any event will not be granted later than 12 months after the date of the meeting.
Board recommendation
The Board (with Mr Lehany abstaining), unanimously recommends the approval of the issue of the performance rights to Mr Lehany and that Shareholders vote in favour of Resolution 5.
7 Resolution 6 – Approval of financial assistance by certain Allied Gold Mining Limited subsidiaries in connection with the acquisition of Allied Gold Mining Limited.
Introduction:
On 28 June 2012, the Company entered into a A$120,000,000 syndicated facility agreement ( Syndicated Facility Agreement ) with National Australia Bank Limited ABN 12 004 044 937 ( NAB ) and Barclays Bank Plc ABN 86 062 469 585 ( Barclays ). The Company borrowed money under the Syndicated Facility Agreement to fund the cash component of the takeover of Allied Gold Mining Limited ( Allied Gold ) and transaction costs.
The Company is party to a number of other financing agreements with NAB and Barclays, including:
-
a Common Terms Agreement, which sets out a range of terms that apply to the funding relationship between the Company and the banks (the Common Terms Agreement ); and
-
a fixed and floating charge, under which the Company has granted security over its assets to the banks.
These documents were in place before the acquisition, and relate also to the Company's existing funding arrangements with NAB and Barclays.
The Common Terms Agreement requires that the Allied Gold companies will:
-
become obligors and guarantors under the Common Terms Agreement; and
-
grant security over their assets to the banks.
The Allied Gold companies are to do this by executing:
-
an Obligor Accession Deed; and
-
General Security Agreement.
page 14
Restrictions on companies giving financial assistance
Under section 260A(1) of the Corporations Act, an Australian incorporated company may only financially assist a person to acquire shares in the company or a holding company of the company in limited circumstances. As an exception to this, an Australian incorporated company can financially assist a person to acquire shares in the company or its holding company if the assistance is approved by its ordinary shareholders.
In addition to this, if the company will be a subsidiary of another company which is listed in Australia immediately after the acquisition, then the financial assistance must also be approved by a special resolution passed at a general meeting of that other company.
A number of the Allied Gold group members are incorporated in Australia. This means that they need the approval of both their immediate shareholders and of a special resolution of the Company, to be able to enter into the proposed Obligor Accession Deed and General Security Agreement. This is the case even though the acquisition has now been completed.
Therefore, Shareholders are asked to consider, and if thought fit, resolve to approve the execution by the Australian incorporated members of the Allied Gold group of the proposed Obligor Accession Deed and General Security Agreement.
The Allied Gold companies ( Allied Gold Australian Subsidiaries ) that need the approvals are:
-
Allied Gold Limited ACN 104 855 067
-
Allied Gold Finance Pty Ltd ACN 141 429 969
-
Australian Solomons Gold Limited ACN 109 492 373
-
JV Mine (Australia) Pty Ltd ACN 096 760 495
-
Solomon Islands International Pty Ltd ACN 009 804 862
-
Allied Tabar Exploration Pty Ltd ACN 119 883 911
The approvals by their immediate shareholders have already been obtained. This resolution, if passed as a special resolution, will provide the necessary approval of the Company's shareholders.
Reasons for the financial assistance
The purpose of requesting shareholder approval of the financial assistance is to enable the Allied Gold Australian Subsidiaries to lawfully become parties to the financing arrangements as contemplated by the Common Terms Agreement.
If the Allied Gold Australian Subsidiaries do not enter into the General Security Agreement and Obligor Accession Deed within 20 days of the Annual General Meeting, this would be an event of default under the Syndicated Facility Agreement and Common Terms Agreement, unless NAB and Barclays agree otherwise.
To that end, the Company has negotiated an agreed set of amendments that would need to be made to the Common Terms Deed that would enable the banks to waive that event of default if resolution 6 is not passed. While those amendments would remove the event of default, they would have countervailing consequences for the Company. In particular, the amendments would:
-
require the Company (and other Obligors) to give additional undertakings in relation to the operation of the Allied Gold Australian Subsidiaries, consistent with the operational and other obligations imposed on the Company and other members of the Allied Gold group (and that would be similar to the undertakings that the Allied Gold Australian Subsidiaries would have given themselves, had resolution 6 been passed and the Allied Gold Australian Subsidiaries had become part of the security group);
-
prohibit distributions from the Allied operating entities in the Solomon Islands and Papua New Guinea being passed through the Allied Australian Subsidiaries to the Company (a
page 15
restriction which would not have been imposed if the Allied Gold Australian Subsidiaries had become part of the security group); and
- restrict the particular activities the Allied Gold Australian Subsidiaries may undertake.
These additional undertakings and restrictions, in particular the prohibition on passing distributions from the Allied operating entities up to the Company, may have adverse consequences for the Company and possibly its Shareholders. For example, they could have the result that the Company would only be able to distribute any dividends from funds available from the Australian assets. The additional undertakings and restrictions would be more disadvantageous for the Company, and potentially its Shareholders than having the Allied Gold Australian Subsidiaries become part of the security group.
Effects of financial assistance
The financial assistance described in this memorandum by the Allied Gold Australian Subsidiaries is unlikely to have an adverse effect on the Company. This is because the Company is already liable for the amounts payable under the Syndicated Facility Agreement and the other facilities.
The Allied Gold Australian Subsidiaries, by entering into the Obligor Accession Deed and General Security Agreement, will become subject to operational and financial covenants similar to those which the Company is already subject to, and will become liable alongside the Company for the amounts owing under the Syndicated Facility Agreement and the other facilities.
Disclosure
The Directors consider that this explanatory memorandum contains all material information known to the Company that could reasonably be required by the Shareholders in deciding on how to vote on the proposed resolution, other than information which it would be unreasonable to require the Company to include because it has been previously disclosed to the Shareholders.
Board recommendation
The Board unanimously recommends the approval of the financial assistance to be provided by the Allied Gold Australian Subsidiaries and that Shareholders vote in favour of Resolution 6.
page 16
8 Definitions
Annual General Meeting means the annual general meeting of St Barbara to be held on Thursday 22 November 2012 at 11:00am (Melbourne time) in the State Library of Victoria Conference Centre, Entry 3 in La Trobe Street between Russell and Swanston Streets, Melbourne to consider and, if thought fit, pass the resolutions set out in the Notice of Annual General Meeting;
Annual Report means the 2012 annual report of St Barbara;
ASX means ASX Limited;
ASX Listing Rules or Listing Rules means the Official Listing Rules of ASX Limited;
Auditor means KPMG;
Board means the board of Directors of St Barbara;
Chairman means the chairman of the Annual General Meeting of St Barbara;
Constitution means the constitution of St Barbara;
Corporations Act means the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth);
Director means a director of St Barbara;
Explanatory Memorandum means the explanatory memorandum accompanying the Notice of Annual General Meeting contained in this Meeting Documentation;
Key Management Personnel has the meaning given in the Corporations Act;
Meeting Documentation means this document comprising of the Notice of Annual General Meeting, Explanatory Memorandum and the Proxy Form;
Non Executive Director means a non executive Director;
Notice of Annual General Meeting means the notice of meeting which is enclosed in the Meeting Documentation;
Ore Reserves has the meaning given to it in the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves;
Proxy Form means the proxy form for the Annual General Meeting contained in the Meeting Documentation;
Share means a fully paid ordinary share in the capital of St Barbara;
Shareholder means a holder of Shares; and
St Barbara or the Company means St Barbara Limited ABN 36 009 165 066.
page 17
Schedule ‐ Performance rights – Further details
Performance rights to be granted in respect of the 2013 financial year will be offered pursuant to the terms of the PRP and the performance conditions set out below.
1. Performance rights pricing
The issue price of the performance rights is based on the 10 day volume weighted average price ( VWAP ) on the ASX of the Company’s share price up to, and including, the last business day of the financial period immediately preceding the period that the performance rights relate to.
That is, in respect of the 2013 financial year, performance rights are priced at $2.09 per right, based on the 10 day VWAP up to and including 30 June 2012.
2. Performance conditions for performance rights
The performance conditions will be measured over a three year period commencing from 1 July 2012. Vesting conditions include satisfying conditions relating to Relative TSR, an increase in Ore Reserves net of production and the ROCE.
3. Percentage of relevant total fixed remuneration offered as LTIs for the 2013 financial year
| year | |
|---|---|
| Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer | 100% |
| Executive General Managers | 60% |
| General Managers | 45% |
The Board has the discretion to vary the relevant percentage each year, having regard to external advice and / or relevant market benchmarks.
4. An example of how performance rights are calculated for the 2013 financial year (assuming the maximum award level) is set out below:
| Executive Level 5 Total Fixed Remuneration (TFR) | $400,000 |
|---|---|
| LTI award value 60% of TFR | $240,000 (i.e. 60% of TFR) |
| 10 day VWAP performance rights price | $2.09 |
| Performance rights to be granted ($240,000 ÷ $2.09) | 114,832 |
5. Relative TSR
TSR measures the growth for a financial year in the price of shares plus cash distributions notionally reinvested in shares. In order for any of the performance rights to vest, the Company’s TSR must be equal to or greater than the median TSR performance of a comparator group (that is, the Relative TSR). The comparator group of companies for performance rights granted in the 2013 financial year comprises:
page 18
| Kingsgate Consolidated Limited | Kingsrose Mining Limited |
|---|---|
| Ramelius Resources Limited | Medusa Mining Limited |
| CGA Mining Limited | Evolution Mining Limited |
| Saracen Mineral Holdings Limited | Regis Resources Limited |
| Silver Lake Resources Limited | OceanaGold Corporation |
| Northern Star Resources Ltd | Tanami Gold NL |
| Focus Minerals Ltd |
At the discretion of the Board, the composition of the comparator group may change from time to time.
Company and comparator TSR performances will be measured using the 10 day VWAP calculation up to, and including, the last business day of the financial period immediately preceding the period that the performance rights relate to, and in determining the closing TSR performances at the end of the three year period.
Relative TSR performance is calculated at a single point in time and is not subject to re‐testing.
The proportion of the performance rights that vest will be determined based on the Company’s TSR relative to the comparator group as follows:
| Relative TSR performance over measurement period |
% of performance rights to vest |
|---|---|
| Below 50thpercentile | 0% |
| 50thpercentile | 50% |
| Between 50th& 75thpercentiles | Sliding scale from 50% to 100% |
| 75thpercentile and above | 100% |
Example – hypothetical measurement of Relative TSR of assumed comparator companies (that is, without reference to the actual comparator companies listed above)
| Company | Three year TSR |
|---|---|
| A | ‐2% p.a. |
| B | +2% p.a. |
| C | +7% p.a. |
| D | +10% p.a. |
| E | +10% p.a. |
| F | +11% p.a. |
| G | +12% p.a. |
| H | +13 % p.a. |
| I | +14 % p.a. |
| J | +21% p.a. |
page 19
If St Barbara’s TSR performance for the corresponding period is assumed to be 12%, then, St Barbara’s Relative TSR performance will fall at the 70[th] percentile, and would mean that the percentage of performance rights that would vest would be 90%.
6. Increase in Ore Reserves
The proportion of the performance rights that vest will also be determined based on the Company’s increase in Ore Reserves net of production over the three year period commencing on 1 July 2012 as outlined below:
| on 1 July2012 as outlined below: | |
|---|---|
| Increase in Ore Reserves (net of production) | Percentage of performance rights to vest |
| Negative growth | 0% |
| Depletion replaced | 50% |
| 20% increase | 100% |
7. ROCE
The proportion of the performance rights that vest will also be determined based on the ROCE by the Company as at 30 June 2015 as outlined below:
| ROCE | Percentage of performance rights to vest |
|---|---|
| Less than or equal to the average annual weighted average cost of capital (WACC) over the three year period commencing on 30 June 2012 |
0% |
| WACC (calculated as above) + 5% | 50% |
| WACC (calculated as above) + 10% | 100% |
8. Example of calculation
Assuming the following measures as at 30 June 2015:
-
Relative TSR: 70%
-
Increase in Ore Reserves (net of production) 10% ROCE WACC + 5%
then the following proportion of performance rights will vest:
(a) Relative TSR Actual score: 70[th] percentile Calculation: 50% (for achieving the 50[th] percentile) + ((70%‐50%)/ (75%‐50%))x (100% ‐ 50%) = 90% (b) Ore Reserves Actual increase in Ore Reserves net of production: 10% Calculation: 50% (for achieving replacement of production) + (10%/20%) (100%‐50%) = 75% (c) _ROCE_ Actual ROCE: WACC + 5% Calculation: 50% (for achieving the 50[th] percentile) + (5%/10%) (100%‐50%) = 75%
(d) Final score (90% + 75% + 75%)/3 = 80%
Using the example of an executive being issued with 114,832 performance rights based on the above calculations, hypothetically 80% would vest, which equals:
80% * 114,832 = 91,866
page 20
ABN 36 009 165 066
==> picture [53 x 57] intentionally omitted <==
Lodge your proxy appointment:
By Mail:
Computershare Investor Services Pty Limited GPO Box 242 Melbourne Victoria 3001 Australia
T 000001 000 SBM MR SAM SAMPLE FLAT 123 123 SAMPLE STREET THE SAMPLE HILL SAMPLE ESTATE SAMPLEVILLE VIC 3030
Alternatively you can fax your form to (within Australia) 1800 783 447 (outside Australia) +61 3 9473 2555
For Intermediary Online subscribers only (custodians) www.intermediaryonline.com
For all enquiries call:
(within Australia) 1300 850 505 (outside Australia) +61 3 9415 4000
Proxy Form
For your proxy appointment to be effective it must be received by 11:00am (Melbourne time) on Tuesday 20 November 2012
How to Vote on Items of Business
Where permitted your shares will be voted in accordance with your directions.
Appointment of Proxy
Voting 100% of your holding: Direct your proxy how to vote by marking one of the boxes opposite each Item of Business. If you do not mark a box your proxy (where permitted) may vote as they choose. If you mark more than one box on an item your vote will be invalid on that item.
Voting a portion of your holding: Indicate a portion of your voting rights by inserting the percentage or number of shares you wish to vote in the For, Against or Abstain box or boxes. The sum of the votes cast must not exceed your voting entitlement or 100%.
Appointing a second proxy: You are entitled to appoint up to two proxies to attend the meeting and vote on a poll. If you appoint two proxies you must specify the percentage or number of shares for each proxy, otherwise each proxy may exercise half of the votes. When appointing a second proxy write both names and the percentage or number of shares for each in Step 1 overleaf.
Signing Instructions
Individual: Where the holding is in one name, the shareholder must sign. Joint Holding: Where the holding is in more than one name, all of the shareholders should sign.
Power of Attorney: If this form is signed on behalf of the shareholder under Power of Attorney and you have not already lodged the Power of Attorney with the registry, please attach a certified photocopy of the Power of Attorney to this form when you return it.
Companies: Where the company has a Sole Director who is also the Sole Company Secretary, this form must be signed by that person. If the company (pursuant to section 204A of the Corporations Act 2001) does not have a Company Secretary, a Sole Director can also sign alone. Otherwise this form must be signed by a Director jointly with either another Director or a Company Secretary. Please sign in the appropriate place to indicate the office held. Delete titles as applicable.
Attending the Meeting
Bring this form to assist registration. If a representative of a corporate shareholder or proxy is to attend the meeting you will need to provide the appropriate “Certificate of Appointment of Corporate Representative” prior to admission. A form of the certificate may be obtained from Computershare or online at www.investorcentre.com under the information tab, "Forms".
A proxy need not be a shareholder of the Company.
Comments & Questions: If you have any comments or questions for the company, please write them on a separate sheet of paper and return with this form.
Turn over to complete the form
View your shareholding information, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week:
www.investorcentre.com
Review your shareholding
Update your shareholding
Your secure access information is:
SRN/HIN: I9999999999
PLEASE NOTE: For security reasons it is important that you keep your SRN/HIN confidential.
916CR_0_Sample_Proxy/000001/000001/i
MR SAM SAMPLE FLAT 123 123 SAMPLE STREET THE SAMPLE HILL SAMPLE ESTATE SAMPLEVILLE VIC 3030
==> picture [18 x 18] intentionally omitted <==
I9999999999
Change of address. If incorrect, mark this box and make the correction in the space to the left. Shareholders sponsored by a broker I9999999999 (reference number commences with ’ X ’) should advise your broker of any changes. I 9999999999 I ND
==> picture [21 x 21] intentionally omitted <==
Proxy Form
to indicate your directions
Please mark
Appoint a Proxy to Vote on Your Behalf
XX
I/We being a member/s of St Barbara Limited and entitled to attend and vote at the 2012 Annual General Meeting of St Barbara Limited hereby appoint
PLEASE NOTE: Leave this box blank if you have selected the Chairman of the Meeting. Do not insert your own name(s).
==> picture [19 x 19] intentionally omitted <==
the Chairman OR of the Meeting
or failing the individual or body corporate named, or if no individual or body corporate is named, the Chairman of the Meeting, as my/our proxy to act generally at the meeting on my/our behalf and to vote in accordance with the following directions (or if no directions have been given, as the proxy sees fit) at the Annual General Meeting of St Barbara Limited to be held in the State Library of Victoria Conference Centre, Entry 3 in La Trobe Street between Russell and Swanston Streets, Melbourne on Thursday 22 November 2012 at 11:00am (Melbourne time) and at any adjournment or postponement of that meeting.
If the Chairman of the Meeting is (or becomes) your proxy you can direct the Chairman to vote for or against or abstain from voting on Items 2, 5 and 6 by marking the appropriate box in step 2 below.
Important for Items 2, 5 and 6: If the Chairman of the Meeting is your proxy or may be appointed by default and you do not wish to direct the Chairman how to vote on Items 2, 5 and 6 below, please mark the box in this section. The Chairman of the Meeting intends to vote undirected proxies in favour of Items 2, 5 and 6. If you do not mark this box and you have not otherwise directed your proxy how to vote on Items 2, 5 and 6, the Chairman of the Meeting will not cast your votes on Items 2, 5 and 6 (as applicable) and your votes will not be counted in computing the required majority if a poll is called on these items.
==> picture [19 x 18] intentionally omitted <==
I/We acknowledge that the Chairman of the Meeting may exercise my/our proxy even if the Chairman has an interest in the outcome of Items 2, 5 and 6 and that votes cast by the Chairman, other than as proxy holder, would be disregarded because of that interest. I/we expressly authorise the Chairman to exercise my/our proxy on Items 2, 5 and 6 even though Items 2, 5 and 6 are connected directly or indirectly with the remuneration of a member of key management personnel, which includes the Chairman.
PLEASE NOTE: If you mark the Abstain box for an item, you are directing your proxy not to vote on your Items of Business behalf on a show of hands or a poll and your votes will not be counted in computing the required majority.
ORDINARY BUSINESS
Item 2 Adoption of Remuneration Report Item 3 Re-election of Director - Mr Saul Jonathan Colin Wise Item 4 Re-election of Director - Mr Phillip Clive Lockyer Item 5 Increase in Non-Executive Directors’ fee cap Item 6 Approval of the issue of performance rights to Mr Timothy James Lehany, Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer Item 7 Approval of financial assistance provided by Allied Gold Mining Limited’s Australian subsidiaries
==> picture [87 x 23] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [86 x 23] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [86 x 23] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [86 x 23] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [86 x 23] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [86 x 23] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [86 x 24] intentionally omitted <==
The Chairman of the Meeting intends to vote all available proxies in favour of each Item of Business.
==> picture [532 x 100] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
SIGN
Signature of Shareholder(s) This section must be completed.
Individual or Shareholder 1 Shareholder 2 Shareholder 3
Sole Director and Sole Company Secretary Director Director/Company Secretary
Contact
Contact Daytime
Name Telephone Date / /
----- End of picture text -----
S B M
9 9 9 9 9 9 A