S&P Global Inc. — Interim / Quarterly Report 2007

Jul 27, 2007

10-Q 1 y37543e10vq.htm FORM 10-Q 10-Q PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007

OR

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 1-1023

THE MCGRAW-HILL COMPANIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

New York	13-1026995
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
1221 Avenue of the Americas, New York, N.Y.	10020
(Address of Principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (212) 512-2000

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

YES þ NO o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

þ Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

YES o NO þ

On July 13, 2007 there were approximately 338.9 million shares of common stock (par value $1.00 per share) outstanding.

Folio /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

TOC

The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements
	Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	3
	Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006	4
	Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2007, December 31, 2006 and June 30, 2006	5
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006	7
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	8
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	20
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	41
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	42
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	43
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	44
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	45
Item 6.	Exhibits	46
EX-15: LETTER ON UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIALS
EX-31.1: CERTIFICATION
EX-31.2: CERTIFICATION
EX-32: CERTIFICATION

Folio 2 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

/TOC

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

We have reviewed the consolidated balance sheet of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., as of June 30, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of income for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, and the consolidated statements of cash flows for the six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.

We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. as of December 31, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, not presented herein, and in our report dated February 27, 2007, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.

Ernst & Young LLP

July 25, 2007

Folio 3 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Part I Financial Information

Item 1. Financial Statements

The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Income

Periods Ended June 30, 2007 and 2006

(in thousands, except per share data)	Three Months — 2007	2006	Six Months — 2007	2006
Revenue (Notes 1 and 3)
Product revenue	$ 605,373	$ 567,930	$ 917,742	$ 870,549
Service revenue	1,112,806	959,613	2,096,855	1,797,673
Total revenue	1,718,179	1,527,543	3,014,597	2,668,222
Expenses
Operating-related expense (Notes 1 and 5)
Product	265,168	261,889	436,146	433,998
Service	369,633	324,587	703,037	633,963
Total operating-related expense	634,801	586,476	1,139,183	1,067,961
Selling and general expense (Notes 1 and 5)
Product	251,666	232,632	455,051	431,771
Service	336,021	307,609	669,279	612,500
Total selling and general expense	587,687	540,241	1,124,330	1,044,271
Depreciation	28,798	28,316	57,703	55,880
Amortization of intangibles	11,468	12,107	23,080	24,033
Total expenses	1,262,754	1,167,140	2,344,296	2,192,145
Other income (Note 4)	—	—	17,305	—
Income from operations	455,425	360,403	687,606	476,077
Interest expense (Notes 7 and 11)	12,099	8,555	13,303	6,046
Income from operations before taxes
on income (Note 3)	443,326	351,848	674,303	470,031
Provision for taxes on income (Note
12)	166,248	130,887	253,387	174,850
Net income (Notes 1 and 2)	$ 277,078	$ 220,961	$ 420,916	$ 295,181
Basic earnings per common share	$ 0.81	$ 0.62	$ 1.22	$ 0.82
Diluted earnings per common share	$ 0.79	$ 0.60	$ 1.18	$ 0.79
Average number of common shares
outstanding: (Note 9)
Basic	340,183	355,783	345,488	361,244
Diluted	350,298	365,507	355,687	371,569

See accompanying notes.

Folio 4 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

	June 30,	Dec. 31,	June 30,
(in thousands)	2007	2006	2006
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and equivalents	$ 358,082	$ 353,498	$ 211,053
Accounts receivable (net of allowance
for doubtful accounts and sales
returns) (Note 6)	1,296,150	1,237,321	1,117,453
Inventories (Note 6)	430,194	322,172	389,425
Deferred income taxes (Note 12)	246,398	244,674	298,571
Prepaid and other current assets	115,490	100,273	120,686
Total current assets	2,446,314	2,257,938	2,137,188
Prepublication costs (net of
accumulated amortization) (Note 6)	557,941	507,838	506,885
Investments and other assets:
Asset for pension benefits (Note 10)	184,485	228,588	276,829
Other	174,318	181,376	182,320
Total investments and other assets	358,803	409,964	459,149
Property and equipment — at cost	1,475,940	1,397,541	1,318,199
Less — accumulated depreciation	906,232	855,322	816,463
Net property and equipment	569,708	542,219	501,736
Goodwill and other intangible assets:
Goodwill — net	1,669,192	1,671,479	1,654,645
Copyrights — net	187,143	194,373	202,316
Other intangible assets — net	450,344	459,079	473,511
Net goodwill and intangible assets	2,306,679	2,324,931	2,330,472
Total assets	$ 6,239,445	$ 6,042,890	$ 5,935,430

See accompanying notes.

Folio 5 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands)	June 30, — 2007	2006		2006
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Notes payable (Note 7)	$ 994,193	$	2,367	$	681,257
Accounts payable	362,373		372,471		294,274
Accrued royalties	53,610		105,606		50,107
Accrued compensation and contributions to
retirement plans (Note 10)	440,729		551,627		363,162
Income taxes currently payable (Note 12)	123,263		77,463		152,796
Unearned revenue	1,025,536		983,210		892,508
Deferred gain on sale leaseback (Note 11)	9,590		9,011		7,927
Other current liabilities (Notes 7 and 14)	492,798		366,261		347,408
Total current liabilities	3,502,092		2,468,016		2,789,439
Other liabilities:
Long-term debt (Note 7)	300		314		327
Deferred income taxes (Note 12)	91,604		150,713		289,247
Liability for postretirement healthcare
and other benefits (Note 10)	125,543		129,558		158,277
Deferred gain on sale leaseback (Note 11)	175,138		180,221		185,327
Other non-current liabilities	453,076		434,450		353,727
Total other liabilities	845,661		895,256		986,905
Total liabilities	4,347,753		3,363,272		3,776,344
Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)
Shareholders’ equity (Notes 8, 9, 10 and 15):
Capital stock	411,709		411,709		411,709
Additional paid-in capital	118,499		114,596		52,123
Retained income (Note 12)	5,093,409		4,821,118		4,362,531
Accumulated other comprehensive income	(106,827	)	(115,212	)	(72,677	)
	5,516,790		5,232,211		4,753,686
Less — common stock in treasury-at
cost (Note 15)	3,625,098		2,552,593		2,594,600
Total shareholders’ equity	1,891,692		2,679,618		2,159,086
Total
liabilities and shareholders’
equity	$ 6,239,445	$	6,042,890	$	5,935,430

See accompanying notes.

Folio 6 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 and 2006

(in thousands)	2007
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income	$ 420,916	$	295,181
Adjustments to reconcile net income to
cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation	57,703		55,880
Amortization of intangibles	23,080		24,033
Amortization of prepublication costs	84,939		75,559
Provision for losses on accounts receivable	9,594		12,025
Net change in deferred income taxes	(60,701	)	(36,545	)
Stock-based compensation	62,811		77,016
Gain on sale of business	(17,305	)	—
Other	2,799		(4,982	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of
effect of acquisitions and dispositions:
Accounts receivable	(49,702	)	(15,405	)
Inventories	(98,947	)	(53,441	)
Prepaid and other current assets	(2,907	)	(14,086	)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	(187,447	)	(271,965	)
Unearned revenue	40,920		38,385
Other current liabilities	21,789		(21,498	)
Interest and income taxes currently payable	58,786		107,702
Net change in other assets and liabilities	22,203		25,405
Cash provided by operating activities	388,531		293,264
Investing activities
Investment in prepublication costs	(132,646	)	(125,061	)
Purchases of property and equipment	(83,449	)	(32,176	)
Acquisition of businesses and equity interests	(40,070	)	(893	)
Disposition of property, equipment and businesses	55,204		12,286
Additions to technology projects	(7,791	)	(10,716	)
Cash (used for) investing activities	(208,752	)	(156,560	)
Financing activities
Borrowings/(payments) on short-term debt — net	991,812		678,298
Dividends paid to shareholders	(142,326	)	(131,860	)
Repurchase of treasury shares	(1,178,287	)	(1,359,322	)
Exercise of stock options	114,092		114,811
Excess tax benefits from share-based payments	32,018		26,394
Cash (used for) financing activities	(182,691	)	(671,679	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash	7,496		(2,759	)
Net change in cash and equivalents	4,584		(537,734	)
Cash and equivalents at beginning of period	353,498		748,787
Cash and equivalents at end of period	$ 358,082	$	211,053

See accompanying notes.

Folio 7 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

| 1. |
| --- |
| The financial information in this report has not been audited, but in the opinion of management
all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary to
present fairly such information have been included. The operating results for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for
the full year due to the seasonal nature of some of the Company’s businesses. The financial
statements included herein should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes
included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the
“annual report”). |
| The Company’s critical accounting policies are disclosed in Item 7, Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, in the annual report. On an ongoing
basis, the Company evaluates its estimates and assumptions, including those related to revenue
recognition, allowance for doubtful accounts and sales returns, valuation of inventories,
prepublication costs, valuation of long-lived assets, goodwill and other intangible assets,
retirement plans and postretirement healthcare and other benefits, income taxes and stock-based
compensation. |
| In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) released FASB Interpretation No.
48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109”
(“FIN 48”) which became effective for and was adopted by the Company as of January 1, 2007. FIN
48 clarifies the accounting and reporting for uncertainties in income taxes and prescribes a
comprehensive model for the financial statement recognition, measurement, presentation and
disclosure of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns. The
Company recognizes interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and
penalties in operating expenses. For further information regarding the effects of adopting FIN
48 see Note 12. |
| In June 2006, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) reached a consensus on EITF No. 06-3, “How
Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities Should Be Presented in
the Income Statement” (“EITF No. 06-3”) which became effective for the Company as of January 1,
2007. EITF No. 06-3 provides that taxes imposed by a governmental authority on a revenue
producing transaction between a seller and a customer should be shown in the income statement on
either a gross or a net basis, based on the entity’s accounting policy, which should be
disclosed pursuant to Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 22, “Disclosure of
Accounting Policies.” The Company will continue to present taxes within the scope of EITF No.
06-3 on a net basis. As such, the adoption of EITF No. 06-3 did not have a material effect on
the Company’s consolidated financial statements. |
| Since the date of the annual report, there have been no other material changes to the Company’s
critical accounting policies. |
| Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified for comparability purposes. |

Folio 8 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

2.
The following table is a reconciliation of the Company’s net income to comprehensive income for
the three month and six month periods ended June 30:

(in thousands)	Three Months — 2007	2006		Six Months — 2007	2006
Net income	$ 277,078	$	220,961	$ 420,916	$	295,181
Other comprehensive income/(loss):
Foreign currency translation
adjustments	17,249		6,394	16,885		12,067
Minimum pension liability, net
of tax	—		—	—		(3,684	)
Retirement plans and
postretirement healthcare
and other benefits, net of
tax (see Note 10)
Effect of change in
valuation:
Unamortized losses	18,831		—	18,831		—
Unamortized prior service
credits	(5,418	)	—	(5,418	)	—
Amortization of prior
service credit included
in net periodic benefit
cost	(285	)	—	(471	)	—
Amortization of losses
included in net periodic
benefit cost	3,373		—	5,375		—
Comprehensive income	$ 310,828	$	227,355	$ 456,118	$	303,564

| 3. |
| --- |
| The Company has three reportable segments: McGraw-Hill Education, Financial Services, and
Information & Media. |
| The McGraw-Hill Education segment is one of the premier global educational publishers serving
the elementary and high school, college and university, professional, international and adult
education markets. Included in the six months ended June 30, 2006 operating profit of the
McGraw-Hill Education segment is a one-time stock-based compensation expense of $4.2 million
(Note 5). |
| The Financial Services segment operates under the Standard & Poor’s brand as one reporting unit
and provides independent global credit ratings, indices, risk evaluation, investment research
and data to investors, corporations, governments, financial institutions, investment managers
and advisors globally. Included in the six month period of 2007 operating profit of the
Financial Services segment is a pre-tax gain of $17.3 million resulting from the sale of its
mutual fund data business on March 16, 2007. Included in the six months ended June 30, 2006 operating profit of the Financial Services segment is a one-time stock-based
compensation expense of $2.1 million (Note 5). |
| The Information & Media (I&M) segment includes business, professional and broadcast media,
offering information, insight and analysis. In the fourth quarter of 2006, the Sweets building products database was |

Folio 9 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

| transformed from a primarily print catalog to a bundled print and online service. Sales of the bundled product are
recognized ratably over the service period. Included in the second quarter and six months ended
June 30, 2007, respectively, revenue and operating profit in the I&M segment is $6.5 million and
$5.8 million for the second quarter and $13.0 million and $11.6 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2007, resulting from the timing of revenue recognition of the bundled product with no
comparable revenue and operating profit in the second quarter and six months ended June 30,
2006. Included in the six months of 2006 operating profit of the I&M segment is a one-time
stock-based compensation expense of $2.7 million (Note 5). |
| --- |
| Included in general corporate expense in the six months of 2006 is a one-time stock-based
compensation expense of $14.8 million (Note 5). Also included in the six month period of 2006
is a pre-tax gain of $4.6 million, resulting from the sale of a facility. |
| Operating profit by segment is the primary basis for the chief operating decision maker of the
Company, the Executive Committee, to evaluate the performance of each segment. A summary of
operating results by segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 are as
follows: |

(in thousands)	2007	Operating		2006	Operating
Three Months	Revenue	Profit		Revenue	Profit
McGraw-Hill Education	$ 647,324	$ 80,402		$ 611,646	$ 67,761
Financial Services	820,993	401,368		677,313	313,886
Information & Media	249,862	14,740		238,584	12,956
Total operating segments	1,718,179	496,510		1,527,543	394,603
General corporate
expense	—	(41,085	)	—	(34,200	)
Interest expense	—	(12,099	)	—	(8,555	)
Total Company	$ 1,718,179	$ 443,326	*	$ 1,527,543	$ 351,848	*

• Income from operations before taxes on income.

(in thousands)	2007	Operating		2006	Operating
Six Months	Revenue	Profit		Revenue	Profit
McGraw-Hill Education	$ 979,004	$ (10,278	)	$ 925,796	$ (29,290	)
Financial Services	1,549,875	749,379		1,277,313	565,543
Information & Media	485,718	24,627		465,113	14,649
Total operating segments	3,014,597	763,728		2,668,222	550,902
General corporate
expense	—	(76,122	)	—	(74,825	)
Interest expense	—	(13,303	)	—	(6,046	)
Total Company	$ 3,014,597	$ 674,303	*	$ 2,668,222	$ 470,031	*

• Income from operations before taxes on income.

| 4. |
| --- |
| On March 16, 2007, the Company sold its mutual fund data business, which was part of the
Financial Services segment. This business was selected for divestiture, as it no longer fit
within the Company’s strategic plans. The divestiture of the mutual fund data business will
enable the Financial Services segment to focus on its core business of providing independent research,
ratings, data indices and portfolio services. |

Folio 10 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

| The Company recognized a pre-tax gain of $17.3 million ($10.3 million after-tax, or $0.03 per diluted share). This disposition is
immaterial to the Company. |
| --- |
| During the first six months of 2007, the Company paid approximately $40.1 million for
businesses acquired. All of these acquisitions are immaterial to the Company individually and
in the aggregate. |

5.
Stock-based compensation for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 is as
follows:

(in millions)	Three Months — 2007	2006	Six Months — 2007	2006
Stock option expense	$ 7.1	$ 10.5	$ 16.6	$ 27.3
Restricted stock awards expense	24.6	12.5	46.2	25.9
	31.7	23.0	62.8	53.2
Restoration option expense	—	—	—	23.8
Total stock-based compensation
expense	$ 31.7	$ 23.0	$ 62.8	$ 77.0

Beginning in 1997, participants who exercised an option by tendering previously owned shares of common stock of the Company could elect to receive a one-time restoration option covering the number of shares tendered including any shares withheld for taxes. Restoration options were granted at fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of the grant, had a maximum term equal to the remainder of the original option term and were subject to a six-month vesting period. Effective March 30, 2006, the Company’s restoration stock option program was eliminated. Restoration options granted between February 3 and March 30, 2006 vested immediately and all restoration options outstanding as of February 3, 2006 became fully vested. During the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company incurred a one-time charge of $23.8 million ($14.9 million after-tax or $0.04 per diluted share) related to the elimination of the restoration stock option program.

The number of common shares issued upon exercise of stock options and the vesting of restricted stock awards were as follows:

	June 30,	Dec. 31,	June 30,
(in thousands of shares)	2007	2006	2006
Stock options exercised	3,460	9,966	5,343
Restricted performance stock
vested	1,320	1,456	928
Total shares issued	4,780	11,422	6,271

Folio 11 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

6.
The allowances for doubtful accounts and sales returns, the components of inventory and the
accumulated amortization of prepublication costs were as follows:

	June 30,	Dec. 31,	June 30,
(in thousands)	2007	2006	2006
Allowance for doubtful accounts	$ 71,378	$ 73,405	$ 74,866
Allowance for sales returns	$ 129,199	$ 188,515	$ 122,329
Inventories:
Finished goods	$ 401,251	$ 292,934	$ 362,232
Work-in-process	8,637	8,047	6,843
Paper and other materials	20,306	21,191	20,350
Total inventories	$ 430,194	$ 322,172	$ 389,425
Accumulated amortization of
prepublication costs	$ 808,739	$ 744,274	$ 1,069,777

7.
A summary of long-term debt follows:

	June 30,	Dec. 31,	June 30,
(in thousands)	2007	2006	2006
Total long-term debt	$ 300	$ 314	$ 327

Commercial paper borrowings as of June 30, 2007 totaled $536.1 million, a decrease from $678.6 million as of June 30, 2006. There were no outstanding commercial paper borrowings at December 31, 2006.

On June 22, 2007, the Company completed the conversion of its commercial paper program from the Section 3a (3) to the Section 4(2) classification as defined under the Securities Act of 1933. This conversion provides the Company with greater flexibility relating to the use of proceeds received from the issuance of commercial paper which may be sold to qualified institutional buyers and accredited investors. All commercial paper issued by the Company subsequent to this conversion date will be executed under the Section 4(2) program. No additional commercial paper will be issued under the Section 3a (3) program. The Section 3a (3) program will be officially terminated when all existing commercial paper outstanding under this program matures in July 2007. The size of the Company’s total commercial paper program remains $1.2 billion and is supported by the revolving credit agreement described below.

The Company has a five-year revolving credit facility agreement of $1.2 billion that expires on July 20, 2009. The Company pays a facility fee of seven basis points on the credit facility agreement whether or not amounts have been borrowed, and borrowings may be made at a spread of 13 basis points above the prevailing LIBOR rates. This spread increases to 18 basis points for borrowings exceeding 50% of the total capacity available under the facility.

The revolving credit facility contains certain covenants. The only financial covenant requires that the Company not exceed indebtedness to cash flow ratio, as defined, of 4 to 1 at any time. This restriction

Folio 12 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

| | has never been exceeded. There were no borrowings under the amended facility as of June
30, 2007 and 2006 and December 31, 2006. |
| --- | --- |
| | In addition, there were $66.1 million in extendible commercial note borrowings (ECNs)
outstanding at June 30, 2007. There were no ECNs borrowings outstanding at June 30, 2006 and
December 31, 2006. The Company has the capacity to issue ECNs of up to $240 million. ECNs
replicate commercial paper, except that the Company has an option to extend the note beyond its
initial redemption date to a maximum final maturity of 390 days. However, if exercised, such an
extension is at a higher reset rate, which is at a predetermined spread over LIBOR and is
related to the Company’s commercial paper rating at the time of extension. As a result of the
extension option, no backup facilities for these borrowings are required. As is the case with
commercial paper, ECNs have no financial covenants. |
| | On April 19, 2007, the Company signed a promissory note with one of its providers of banking
services to enable the Company to borrow additional funds, on an uncommitted basis, from time to
time to supplement its commercial paper and ECNs borrowings. The specific terms (principal,
interest rate and maturity date) of each borrowing governed by this promissory note are
determined on the borrowing date of each loan. These borrowings have no financial covenants.
There were $392.0 million of borrowings outstanding under this promissory note at June 30, 2007.
There were no promissory note borrowings outstanding at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2006. |
| | Total short-term borrowings, described above as consisting of commercial paper, ECNs and
promissory note borrowings, totaled $994.2 million at June 30, 2007 with an average interest
rate of 5.4% and an average term of 57 days. This represents an increase from $678.6 million of
short-term borrowings outstanding at June 30, 2006. These total borrowings are classified as
notes payable and categorized as current debt. There were no short-term borrowings outstanding
at December 31, 2006. |
| | Certain share repurchases executed in June 2007 remained unsettled as of June 30, 2007.
Accordingly, the Company has recorded a liability of $95.6 million, classified in other current
liabilities, to cover the settlement of these shares. At December 31, 2006, the Company did
not have any share repurchases that remained unsettled. Additionally, certain shares
repurchased in June 2006 remained unsettled as of June 30, 2006. Accordingly, the Company had
recorded a liability of $27.4 million as of June 30, 2006, classified in other current
liabilities, to cover the settlement of these shares. |
| 8. | Cash Dividends |
| | Cash dividends per share declared during the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006
were as follows: |

	Three Months — 2007	2006	Six Months — 2007	2006
Common stock	$ 0.2050	$ 0.1815	$ 0.4100	$ 0.3630

Folio 13 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

| 9. |
| --- |
| A reconciliation of the number of shares used for calculating basic earnings per common share
and diluted earnings per common share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006
follows: |

(in thousands)	Three Months — 2007	2006	Six Months — 2007	2006
Average number of common shares
outstanding	340,183	355,783	345,488	361,244
Effect of stock options and other
dilutive securities	10,115	9,724	10,199	10,325
Average number of common shares
outstanding including effect of
dilutive securities	350,298	365,507	355,687	371,569

| | Restricted performance shares outstanding at June 30, 2007 and 2006 of 2,284,000 and 1,794,000
were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per common share because the necessary
vesting conditions have not yet been met. |
| --- | --- |
| 10. | Retirement Plans and Postretirement Healthcare and Other Benefits |
| | A summary of net periodic benefit cost for the Company’s defined benefit plans and
postretirement healthcare and other benefits for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007
and 2006 is as follows: |

Defined Benefit Plan — (in thousands)	Three Months — 2007	2006		2007		2006
Service cost	$ 17,687	$	15,042	$	33,350	$	29,799
Interest cost	21,652		17,896		41,044		35,569
Expected return on plan assets	(25,655	)	(22,610	)	(50,001	)	(45,292	)
Amortization of prior service
(credit)/cost	(143	)	73		(146	)	146
Amortization of loss	5,560		4,016		8,237		7,867
Net periodic benefit cost	$ 19,101	$	14,417	$	32,484	$	28,089

Postretirement Healthcare and
Other Benefits	Three Months			Six Months
(in thousands)	2007	2006		2007		2006
Service cost	$ 713	$	507	$	1,252	$	1,040
Interest cost	1,967		1,773		3,931		3,844
Amortization of prior service
credit	(297	)	(302	)	(594	)	(593	)
Net periodic benefit cost	$ 2,383	$	1,978	$	4,589	$	4,291

The amortization of prior service (credit)/cost and amortization of loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, included in the above tables, have been recognized in the net periodic benefit cost and included in other comprehensive income, net of tax.

Folio 14 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

In 2007, the expected rate of return on plan assets is 8.0% based on a market-related value of assets, which recognizes changes in market value over five years. The Company changed certain assumptions on its pension plans which became effective on January 1, 2007:

| • | The Company changed its discount rate assumption on its U.S. retirement
plans to 5.90% from 5.65% in 2006. |
| --- | --- |
| • | The Company changed its discount rate assumption on its United Kingdom
(U.K.) retirement plan to 4.90% from 4.75% in 2006 and its assumed
compensation increase factor for its U.K. retirement plan to 5.75% from
5.50%. |

| | The effect of the assumption changes on pension expense for the three and six months ended June
30, 2007 did not have a material effect on earnings per share. |
| --- | --- |
| | As of June 30, 2007, the Company performed a revaluation of its postretirement benefit
obligations. As a result of this revaluation, the Company recorded $18.8 million (net of tax)
of unrecognized actuarial losses and $5.4 million (net of tax) of unrecognized prior service
credits in other comprehensive income (see Note 2) for the three and six months ended June 30,
2007. |
| 11. | Sale Leaseback Transaction |
| | In December 2003, the Company sold its 45% equity investment in Rock-McGraw, Inc., which owns
the Company’s headquarters building in New York City. The transaction was valued at $450.0
million, including assumed debt. Proceeds from the disposition were $382.1 million. The sale
resulted in a pre-tax gain of $131.3 million and an after-tax benefit of $58.4 million, or 15
cents per diluted share in 2003. |
| | The Company remains an anchor tenant of what continues to be known as The McGraw-Hill Companies
building and will continue to lease space from Rock-McGraw, Inc., under an existing lease. As
of December 31, 2006, the Company had a lease for approximately 17% of the building space for
approximately 13 years, which is being accounted for as an operating lease. Pursuant to sale
leaseback accounting rules, as a result of the Company’s continued involvement, a gain of
approximately $212.3 million ($126.3 million after-tax) was deferred and will be amortized over
the remaining lease term as a reduction in rent expense. Information relating to the
sale-leaseback transaction for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 is as
follows: |

(in millions)	Three Months — 2007		2006		Six Months — 2007		2006
Reduction in rent expense	$ (4.4	)	$ (4.2	)	$ (8.8	)	$ (8.4	)
Interest expense	2.1		2.2		4.3		4.5

| 12. |
| --- |
| The Company calculates its interim income tax provision in accordance with Accounting Principles
Board Opinion No. 28, “Interim Financial Reporting” and FASB Interpretation No. 18, “Accounting
for Income Taxes in Interim Periods” (FIN 18). At the end of each interim period, the Company
estimates the annual effective tax rate and applies that rate to its ordinary quarterly
earnings. The tax expense or benefit related to significant, unusual, or extraordinary items
that will be separately reported or reported net of their related tax effect, and are
individually computed are recognized in the interim period in which those items occur. In
addition, the effect of changes in enacted tax laws or rates or tax status is recognized in the
interim period in which the change occurs. |

Folio 15 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

| The computation of the annual estimated effective tax rate at each interim period requires
certain estimates and significant judgment including, but not limited to, the expected operating
income for the year, projections of the proportion of income earned and taxed in foreign
jurisdictions, permanent and temporary differences, and the likelihood of recovering deferred tax assets generated in the current year. The accounting estimates used to
compute the provision for income taxes may change as new events occur, more experience is
acquired, additional information is obtained or as the tax environment changes. |
| --- |
| For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2007, the provision for income taxes resulted
in an effective tax rate of 37.5% and 37.6%, respectively. For the three months and six months
ended June 30, 2006, the provision for income taxes resulted in an effective tax rate of 37.2%.
The minor increase in the effective tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007,
compared to the prior periods, is primarily attributable to the net effect of several items
including the accounting for uncertain tax positions (FIN 48), the non-recurring book gain (a
discrete tax item) in connection with the sale of the Company’s mutual fund data business, a
state tax audit settlement (a discrete tax item), and an enacted change in the NYS corporate tax
laws. The difference in tax rate between the three months and six months ended June 30, 2007 is
from the gain on the divestiture of the mutual fund data business. |
| The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007. As a result of the
implementation of FIN 48, the Company recognized an increase in the liability for unrecognized
tax benefits of approximately $5.2 million, which was accounted for as a reduction to the
January 1, 2007 balance of retained earnings. The total amount of federal, state and local, and
foreign unrecognized tax benefits as of June 30 and January 1, 2007 was $75.1 million, exclusive
of interest and penalties. There have been no material changes to the liability for uncertain
tax positions for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2007. Included in the balance
at June 30 and January 1, 2007, are $13.5 million of tax positions for which the ultimate
deductibility is highly certain but for which there is uncertainty about the timing of such
deductibility. Because of the impact of deferred tax accounting, other than interest and
penalties, the disallowance of the shorter deductibility period would not affect the annual
effective tax rate but would accelerate the payment of cash to the taxing authority to an
earlier period. The Company recognizes interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in
interest expense and penalties in operating expenses. As of June 30 and January 1, 2007, the
Company had $11.0 million and $8.7 million, respectively, of accrued interest and penalties, net
of tax benefit, associated with uncertain tax positions. |
| The Company or one of its subsidiaries files income tax returns in the U.S. federal
jurisdiction, various states, and foreign jurisdictions, and the Company is routinely under
audit by many different tax authorities. Management believes that its accrual for tax
liabilities is adequate for all open audit years based on its assessment of many factors
including past experience and interpretations of tax law. This assessment relies on estimates
and assumptions and may involve a series of complex judgments about future events. With few
exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or non-U.S.
income tax examinations by tax authorities for the years before 2002. It is possible that
federal, state and foreign tax examinations will be settled during the next twelve months. If
any of these tax audit settlements do occur within the next twelve months, the Company would
make any necessary adjustments to the accrual for uncertain tax benefits. Until formal
resolutions are reached between the Company and the tax authorities, the determination of a
possible audit settlement range with respect to the impact on uncertain tax benefits is not
practicable. On the basis of present information, it is the opinion of the Company’s management
that any assessments resulting from the current audits will not have a material adverse effect
on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. |

Folio 16 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

| 13. |
| --- |
| A writ of summons was served on The McGraw-Hill Companies, SRL and on The McGraw-Hill
Companies, SA (both indirect subsidiaries of the Company) (collectively, “Standard & Poor’s”)
on September 29, 2005 and October 7, 2005, respectively, in an action brought in the Tribunal of Milan, Italy by Enrico
Bondi (“Bondi”), the Extraordinary Commissioner of Parmalat Finanziaria S.p.A. and Parmalat
S.p.A. (collectively, “Parmalat”). Bondi has brought numerous other lawsuits in both Italy and
the United States against entities and individuals who had dealings with Parmalat. In this
suit, Bondi claims that Standard & Poor’s, which had issued investment grade ratings of
Parmalat until shortly before Parmalat’s collapse in December 2003, breached its duty to issue
an independent and professional rating and negligently and knowingly assigned inflated ratings
in order to retain Parmalat’s business. Alleging joint and several liability, Bondi claims
damages of euros 4,073,984,120 (representing the value of bonds issued by Parmalat and the
rating fees paid by Parmalat) with interest, plus damages to be ascertained for Standard &
Poor’s alleged complicity in aggravating Parmalat’s financial difficulties and/or for having
contributed in bringing about Parmalat’s indebtedness towards its bondholders, and legal fees.
The Company believes that Bondi’s allegations and claims for damages lack legal or factual
merit. Standard & Poor’s filed its answer, counterclaim and third-party claims on March 16,
2006 and will continue to vigorously contest the action. |
| In a separate proceeding, the prosecutor’s office in Parma, Italy is conducting an
investigation into the bankruptcy of Parmalat. In June 2006, the prosecutor’s office issued a
Note of Completion of an Investigation (“Note of Completion”) concerning allegations, based on
Standard & Poor’s investment grade ratings of Parmalat, that individual Standard & Poor’s
rating analysts conspired with Parmalat insiders and rating advisors to fraudulently or
negligently cause the Parmalat bankruptcy. The Note of Completion was served on eight Standard
& Poor’s rating analysts. |
| While not a formal charge, the Note of Completion indicates the prosecutor’s intention that the
named rating analysts should appear before a judge in Parma for a preliminary hearing, at which
hearing the judge will determine whether there is sufficient evidence against the rating
analysts to proceed to trial. No date has been set for the preliminary hearing. On July 7,
2006, a defense brief was filed with the Parma prosecutor’s office on behalf of the rating
analysts. The Company believes that there is no basis in fact or law to support the
allegations against the rating analysts, and they will be vigorously defended by the
subsidiaries involved. |
| In addition, in the normal course of business both in the United States and abroad, the Company
and its subsidiaries are defendants in numerous legal proceedings and are involved, from time
to time, in governmental and self-regulatory agency proceedings, which may result in adverse
judgments, damages, fines or penalties. Also, various governmental and self-regulatory agencies
regularly make inquiries and conduct investigations concerning compliance with applicable laws
and regulations. Based on information currently known by the Company’s management, the Company
does not believe that any pending legal, governmental or self-regulatory proceedings or
investigations will result in a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results
of operations. |

Folio 17 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

14.	Restructuring
	During 2006, the Company completed a restructuring of a limited number of business operations
in McGraw-Hill Education, Information & Media and Corporate, to enhance the Company’s long-term
growth prospects. The restructuring included the integration of the Company’s elementary and
secondary basal publishing businesses. The Company recorded restructuring charges of $31.5
million pre-tax, consisting primarily of vacant facilities and employee severance and benefit
costs related to the reduction of approximately 700 positions across the Company. This charge
was comprised of $16.0 million for McGraw-Hill Education,
$8.7 million for Information & Media and $6.8
million for Corporate. The after-tax charge recorded was $19.8 million, or six cents per
diluted share. Restructuring expenses for Information & Media and Corporate were classified as
selling and general service expenses within the statement of income. Restructuring expenses for
McGraw-Hill Education were classified as selling and general product expenses, $9.3 million,
and selling and general service expense, $6.7 million, within the statement of income. At
December 31, 2006, all employees made redundant by the restructuring had been terminated and
$10.9 million was paid consisting primarily for employee severance and benefit costs. At
December 31, 2006, the remaining reserve, which was included in other current liabilities, was
approximately $20.6 million.
	For the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, the Company has paid approximately $2.9
million and $7.6 million, respectively, consisting primarily of employee severance costs. The
remaining reserve at June 30, 2007 was approximately $13.0 million.
15.	Related Party Transactions
	On March 30, 2006, as part of its previously announced stock buyback program, the Company
acquired 8.4 million shares of the Corporation’s stock from the holdings of the recently
deceased William H. McGraw. The shares were purchased at a discount of approximately 2.4% from
the March 30, 2006 New York Stock Exchange closing price through a private transaction with Mr.
McGraw’s estate. This trade settled on April 5, 2006 and the total purchase amount was $468.8
million. The transaction was approved by the Financial Policy and Audit Committees of the
Company’s Board of Directors, and the Corporation received independent financial and legal
advice concerning the purchase.
16.	Recently Issued Accounting Standards
	In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Statement No.
159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS No. 159”) to
provide companies with an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair
value. The objective of SFAS No. 159 is to reduce both the complexity in accounting for
financial instruments and the volatility in earnings caused by measuring related assets and
liabilities differently. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years that begin after November
15, 2007 which for the Company is January 1, 2008 and will be applied prospectively. The Company
is currently evaluating the impact SFAS No. 159 will have on its Consolidated Financial
Statements and is not yet in a position to determine what, if any, effects SFAS No. 159 will
have on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
	In September 2006, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS No.
157”) to clarify the definition of fair value, establish a framework for measuring fair value
and expand the disclosures on fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability

Folio 18 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. SFAS No. 157 also stipulates that, as a market-based measurement, fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, and establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between (a) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs) and (b) the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years that begin after November 15, 2007 which for the Company is January 1, 2008 and will be applied prospectively. The Company is currently evaluating the impact SFAS No. 157 will have on its Consolidated Financial Statements and is not yet in a position to determine what, if any, effects SFAS No. 157 will have on the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Folio 19 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Results of Operations — Comparing Three Months Ended June 30, 2007 and 2006

Consolidated Review

The Segment Review that follows is incorporated herein by reference.

Revenue and Operating Profit

	Second — Quarter	%	Second — Quarter
(millions of dollars)	2007	Increase	2006
Revenue	$ 1,718.2	12.5	$ 1,527.5
Operating profit *	$ 496.5	25.8	$ 394.6
% Operating margin	28.9		25.8

• Operating profit is income from operations before taxes on income, interest expense and corporate expense.

In the second quarter of 2007 the Company achieved growth in revenue and operating profit of 12.5% and 25.8%, respectively. The increase in revenue is primarily attributable to growth in the Financial Services segment. Foreign exchange rates positively impacted revenue growth by $16.8 million and had an immaterial impact on operating profit growth.

The transformation of Sweets to an internet-based sales and marketing solution benefited revenue and operating profit by $6.5 million and $5.8 million, respectively, in the quarter.

Product revenue increased 6.6% in the second quarter of 2007, due primarily to increases at McGraw-Hill Education.

Product operating-related expenses increased slightly, which include amortization of prepublication costs, primarily due to the growth in expenses at McGraw-Hill Education from the increase in direct expenses relating to product development, offset by cost containment. Amortization of prepublication costs increased by $3.8 million or 7.2%, as compared with the second quarter of 2006, as a result of product mix and adoption cycles.

Product related selling and general expenses increased 8.2%, primarily due to sales opportunities at McGraw-Hill Education. The product margin improved 1.7% mainly due to the improved opportunities at McGraw-Hill Education. The adoption market purchases in 2007 are expected to be between $750 million and $800 million as compared with $685 million in 2006.

Service revenue increased 16.0% in the second quarter of 2007, due primarily to a 21.2% increase in Financial Services. Financial Services increased primarily due to the performance of structured finance ratings and corporate (industrial and financial services) and government finance ratings. In the U.S., issuance of collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) and commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) drove growth in structured finance, while in Europe issuance across all asset classes grew at a double-digit pace. The growth in corporate ratings issuance was driven primarily by acquisition financing, while public finance also performed well in the quarter with issuance driven by new money issuance and refundings. The service margin increased to 36.6%.

Total expenses in the second quarter of 2007 increased 8.2% due primarily to the growth in Financial Services.

During 2006, the Company restructured a limited number of business operations to enhance the Corporation’s long-term growth prospects. As a result, in 2006, the Company recorded a restructuring charge of $31.5 million pre-tax, consisting mostly of vacant facilities and employee severance costs of $8.7 million for Information & Media, $16.0 million for McGraw-Hill Education, and $6.8 million for Corporate.

Folio 20 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

The after-tax charge recorded was $19.8 million or $0.06 per share. For the three months ended June 30, 2007, the Company has paid approximately $2.9 million, consisting primarily of employee severance and benefit costs. The remaining reserve at June 30, 2007 was approximately $13.0 million.

In the second quarter of 2007, depreciation expense increased 1.7% to $28.8 million. Amortization of intangibles decreased 5.3% to $11.5 million in the second quarter of 2007.

Interest expense increased to $12.1 million in the second quarter of 2007, compared with $8.6 million in 2006. This increase is attributed to higher average short-term debt borrowings at higher interest rates for the three months ended June 30, 2007. Average total short-term borrowings consisting of commercial paper, extendible commercial notes (ECNs), and promissory note borrowings outstanding for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 was $800.2 million at an average interest rate of 5.4%. This compares to average total short-term borrowings consisting of commercial paper outstanding for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 of $427.4 million at an average interest rate of 5.0%. There were no ECNs or promissory note borrowings outstanding during the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (see Note 7). Included in the second quarter of 2007 and 2006 is approximately $2.1 million and $2.2 million, respectively, of interest expense related to the sale leaseback of the Company’s headquarters building in New York City (see Note 11). Also included in the second quarter of 2007 and 2006, is interest income earned on foreign investment balances.

For the quarters ended June 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006 the effective tax rate was 37.5% and 37.2%, respectively in each year. The Company adopted the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (FIN 48) on January 1, 2007. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, the Company recognized an increase in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $5.2 million, which was accounted for as a reduction to the January 1, 2007 balance of retained earnings. The total amount of federal, state and local, and foreign unrecognized tax benefits as of January 1, 2007 was $75.1 million. Included in the balance at January 1, 2007, are $13.5 million of tax positions for which the ultimate deductibility is highly certain but for which there is uncertainty about the timing of such deductibility. Because of the impact of deferred tax accounting, other than interest and penalties, the disallowance of the shorter deductibility period would not affect the annual effective tax rate but would accelerate the payment of cash to the taxing authority to an earlier period. The Company recognizes interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in operating expenses. In addition to the unrecognized tax benefits, the Company has approximately $11.0 million and $8.7 million, net of tax benefit, for the payment of interest and penalties accrued as of June 30, 2007 and January 1, 2007, respectively.

The Company expects the effective tax rate to be at 37.5% for the remainder of the year absent the impact of numerous factors including intervening audit settlements, changes in federal, state or foreign law and changes in the locational mix of the Company’s income.

Net income for the quarter increased 25.4% as compared with the second quarter of 2006. Diluted earnings per share were $0.79 as compared with $0.60 in 2006.

Folio 21 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Segment Review

McGraw-Hill Education

	Second — Quarter	%	Second — Quarter
(millions of dollars)	2007	Increase	2006
Revenue
School Education Group	$ 403.3	3.3	$ 390.4
Higher Education, Professional
and International	244.0	10.3	221.3
Total revenue	$ 647.3	5.8	$ 611.7
Operating profit	$ 80.4	18.6	$ 67.8
% Operating margin	12.4		11.1

Revenue and operating profit for the McGraw-Hill Education (MHE) segment increased 5.8% and 18.6%, respectively, over the prior year. Foreign exchange rates positively impacted revenue growth by $4.5 million and had an immaterial impact on operating profit growth.

In the second quarter of 2007, revenue for the McGraw-Hill School Education Group (SEG) increased $12.9 million or 3.3% as compared with the second quarter of 2006.

Total U.S. PreK-12 enrollment for 2006-2007 is estimated at 55.0 million students, up 0.5% from 2005-2006, according to the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). The total available state new adoption market in 2007 is estimated at between $750 million and $800 million compared with approximately $685 million in 2006.

The year’s key opportunities in the state new adoption market are primarily offered by math in Texas and science in California. Additionally, science in South Carolina and reading/literature in Tennessee and Indiana provide large opportunities for 2007. Other states, such as North Carolina, offer excellent opportunities in smaller curriculum areas where SEG has a competitive edge in the music, art, and vocational education disciplines.

In the adoption market, strong performances in 6-12 math in Texas, K-12 science in California, K-8 science in South Carolina, and K-5 reading in Indiana contributed to SEG’s second quarter revenue growth. However, sales volume of Open Court Reading declined significantly in California, North Carolina and Texas in 2007 compared to 2006.

In the open territory, SEG had a strong performance in science winning preK-5 in Washington DC. In reading/literature, SEG wins included K-5 in Peoria, Arizona; Valley View, Illinois; the Fox School District in Missouri; and Madison, Arizona. Social studies 6-12 was adopted in Washington, DC.; and in music, SEG’s Spotlight on Music was adopted in Prince George’s County, Maryland.

According to statistics compiled by the Association of American Publishers (AAP), total net basal and supplementary sales of elementary and secondary instructional materials were down by 7.6% through May 2007 compared to the same period in 2006.

In the testing market, SEG’s second-quarter custom testing contracts decreased slightly over the prior year due to the discontinuation of the Kentucky and Maryland contracts, partially offset by the new Georgia contract and increased work in the Tennessee, Missouri, Indiana and Qatar contracts. SEG continued to invest in technology to improve efficiencies in developing, delivering, and scoring custom assessments. The non-custom or “shelf” test products volume decreased in the second quarter of 2007 compared to the same period in 2006, as scoring of Terra Nova declined.

Folio 22 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

At the McGraw-Hill Higher Education, Professional and International Group (HPI), revenue increased $22.7 million or 10.3% compared to prior year.

For higher education all three imprints, Science, Engineering and Mathematics (SEM), Humanities, Social Science and Languages (HSSL) and Business and Economics (B&E) performed well, with SEM experiencing the highest gain of the three imprints. Key titles contributing to the second quarter 2007 performance included McConnell, Economics, 16/e; Sabin, Gregg Reference Manual , 10/e; Knorre, Puntos De Partida ,7/e; Lucas, The Art of Public Speaking, 9/e; Nickels, Understanding Business ,7/e; and Shier, Hole’s Essentials of Anatomy and Physiology , 9/e.

Contributing to the second quarter performance of professional titles were the releases of the McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Science and Technology, 10/e; Harrison’s Manual of Internal Medicine ; The Millionaire Maker’s Guide to Creating a Cash Machine for Life; The Nursing Spectrum Drug Handbook, 2008 ; and Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine , 16/e.

Internationally, strong performance of professional titles, particularly the McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Science and Technology, 10/e in Australia and Asia, contributed to HPI growth.

Financial Services

	Second — Quarter	%	Second — Quarter
(millions of dollars)	2007	Increase	2006
Revenue	$ 821.0	21.2	$ 677.3
Operating profit	$ 401.4	27.9	$ 313.9
% Operating margin	48.9		46.3

Financial Services revenue and operating profit increased substantially over second quarter 2006 results. Foreign exchange positively impacted revenue growth by $12.1 million and had an immaterial impact on operating profit growth.

The Financial Services segment’s increase in revenue and operating profit was due to the performance of structured finance and corporate (industrials and financial services) and government ratings, which represented approximately 42.1% and 38.1%, respectively, of the growth in revenue. In the U.S., issuance of collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) and commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) drove growth in structured finance, while in Europe issuance across all asset classes grew at a double-digit pace. The growth in corporate ratings issuance was driven primarily by acquisition financing, while public finance also performed well in the quarter with issuance driven by new money issuance and refundings.

Total U.S. structured finance new issue dollar volume increased 5.5% in the second quarter versus prior year. U.S. CDO issuance increased 58.0%, according to Harrison Scott Publications and Standard & Poor’s internal estimates (Harrison Scott Publications/S&P). Despite weakness in issuance of cash CDOs backed by subprime residential mortgage-backed securities, overall issuance of U.S. CDOs remained strong due to growth in other sectors such as issuance of hybrids and synthetics as well as issuance of collateralized loan obligations (CLOs) which was fueled by the robust acquisition financing market. U.S. commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) issuance increased 38.5% over the prior year due to higher mortgage originations driven by the low interest rate environment and strong commercial real estate fundamentals as well as rising property values and refinancing of maturing deals. U.S. residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) issuance decreased 12.4%, driven primarily by declines in the subprime and home equity sectors. According to Thomson Financial, U.S. corporate issuance by dollar volume for the second

Folio 23 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

quarter of 2007 increased 34.5%, with investment grade up 33.0% and high yield issuance up 42.6%, driven by continued robust merger and acquisition activity and opportunistic financing as issuers took advantage of favorable market conditions. The U.S. municipal market grew 15.3%, coming off a slow second quarter 2006, reflecting increased levels of new money issuance and refunding due to favorable interest rates. Bank loan ratings, counterparty credit ratings as well as derivatives ratings all showed strong growth in the quarter.

In Europe for the second quarter, structured finance issuance grew 46.1% primarily driven by growth in CMBS and RMBS. Market fundamentals and demand for commercial real estate remained strong in Europe. A stable economic backdrop combined with moderate home price growth in most European countries fueled demand for mortgage credit and RMBS volumes picked up as new and existing issuers took advantage of tight spreads. European corporate issuance was up 27.0% in the second quarter due to solid growth in the industrials and financial services sectors resulting primarily from strong merger and acquisition activity. High yield issuance in Europe was up 89.1% for the quarter.

Structured finance will continue to drive global growth in 2007 with increases expected in all regions around the world. However, financial market concerns regarding the credit quality of subprime mortgages could adversely impact future debt issuance of residential mortgage backed securities and CDOs backed by subprime RMBS in the United States. On July 10, 2007, Standard & Poor’s placed 612 classes of residential mortgage-backed securities backed by U.S. subprime collateral on CreditWatch with negative implications. Some of these classes have subsequently been downgraded. Standard & Poor’s also indicated that it would assess the impact of these potential negative movements on related asset classes, such as CDOs. Similar actions were taken by other credit ratings agencies as well. Notwithstanding the current market environment in the U.S., the Company had been anticipating a decline in residential mortgage originations as well as a slow down in the rate of growth of CDO issuance versus the significant rates of growth experienced in the past. U.S. residential mortgage backed securities issuance is expected to decline by approximately 20%-30% in the second half of the year which would result in approximately a 15%-20% decline in issuance for the year. Slower growth in U.S. CDO issuance is also expected, with growth rates ranging from approximately 15%-20% for the balance of the year. U.S. CDO growth for the year is expected to range between approximately 40-45% versus 93% in the first half of 2007. The outlook for both asset classes as well as others is dependent upon many factors including the general condition of the economy, interest rates, credit quality and spreads, and the level of liquidity in the financial markets.

Standard & Poor’s is a leading provider of data, analysis and independent investment advice and recommendations. Securities information products such as RatingsXpress and RatingsDirect performed well as customer demand for fixed income data increased. CUSIP issuance volume also increased. The Capital IQ product showed growth with the number of clients increasing 28.9% over the second quarter of 2006 and up 4.8% versus the first quarter of 2007. Market conditions continued to be challenging in equity research.

Revenue related to Standard & Poor’s indices increased as assets under management for exchange-traded funds (ETFs) rose 20.9% from June 30, 2006 to $178.6 billion as of June 30, 2007. ETF assets under management at December 31, 2006 were $167.3 billion.

The financial services industry is subject to the potential for increasing regulation in the United States and abroad. The businesses conducted by the Financial Services segment are in certain cases regulated under the Credit Rating Agency Reform Act of 2006, U.S. Investment Advisers Act of 1940, the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the National Association of Securities Dealers and/or the laws of the states or other jurisdictions in which they conduct business.

Folio 24 /Folio PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services is a credit rating agency that has been designated as one of seven Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations, or NRSROs, by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The SEC first began designating NRSROs in 1975, for use of their credit ratings, in the determination of capital charges for registered brokers and dealers under the SEC’s Net Capital Rule. During the last five years, the SEC has been examining the purpose of and the need for greater regulation of NRSROs. During this period, the SEC issued a report on the role and function of credit rating agencies, a concept release that questioned whether the SEC should continue to designate NRSROs for regulatory purposes, and a rule proposal to define NRSROs.

Credit rating agency legislation entitled “Credit Rating Agency Reform Act of 2006” was signed into law by President Bush on September 29, 2006. The legislation creates a new SEC registration system for rating agencies that want to be treated as NRSROs. Eligible agencies include those with business models different from the existing NRSROs, including Standard & Poor’s. Registrants, including existing NRSROs, will need to submit policies, methodologies, performance data and other materials the SEC requires under the new rules issued in final form in June 2007. New firms must provide evidence that certain capital market participants regard them as issuers of quality credit opinions. The SEC will have a limited time to deny an application. Registered NRSROs will need to certify annually as to the accuracy of application materials and list material changes. The SEC is given new, expansive authority and oversight of NRSROs and will be able to censure NRSROs, revoke their registration or limit or suspend their registration in certain cases. The SEC is not supposed to be injected into the analytical process, ratings criteria or methodology. Importantly, an agency’s decision to register and comply with the law will not constitute a waiver of or diminish any right, defense or privilege available under applicable law. Pre-emption language is included consistent with other legal precedent. The Company does not believe this legislation will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.

On February 5, 2007, the SEC issued proposed rules to implement the 2006 legislation and a draft Form NRSRO for applicants to complete in registering with the SEC. Public comments were due by March 12, 2007. Standard & Poor’s submitted comments on March 12, 2007 and submitted a second set of comments on March 26, 2007. On May 23, 2007, the SEC voted to adopt the proposed rules and application form. The effective date of Form NRSRO and rules relating to it was June 18, 2007; the remaining rules were effective on June 26, 2007. Standard & Poor’s submitted its application on Form NRSRO on June 25, 2007 and expects to receive the SEC’s decision by late September. Standard & Poor’s will continue to be an NRSRO under the prior regime until the SEC determines its application.

The legal status of rating agencies has also been addressed by courts in the United States in various decisions and is likely to be considered and addressed in legal proceedings from time to time in the future.

Outside the United States, particularly in Europe, regulators and government officials also have reviewed whether credit rating agencies should be subject to formal oversight. In the past several years, the European Commission, the Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) have issued reports, consultations and questionnaires on the role of credit agencies and potential regulation. IOSCO’s review culminated in December 2004 with its Code of Conduct Fundamentals for rating agencies. Standard & Poor’s worked closely with IOSCO in its drafting of the code and earlier principles on which the code was based. In October 2005, Standard & Poor’s replaced its existing code of practices and procedures with a new Ratings Services Code of Conduct which is consistent with the IOSCO Code. In February 2006, Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services published a report concerning implementation of its Code of Conduct. Standard & Poor’s met with representatives of CESR in June 2006 to discuss the Ratings Services Code of Conduct and Implementation Report. In July 2006, CESR published a questionnaire for comment on rating agencies’ codes of conduct and implementation. CESR published the comments it received last fall. In December 2006, pursuant to a

Folio 25 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

request by the European Commission, CESR issued its first annual report to the European Commission on compliance by credit rating agencies with the IOSCO Code. CESR concluded that the four agencies it reviewed (Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services, Moody’s Investors Service, Fitch Ratings and Dominion Bond Rating Service) are largely compliant with the IOSCO Code. CESR noted areas for improvement and plans to review these areas in 2007. CESR stated it will also assess in its next report the impact of the new U.S. law and SEC rules on the ratings industry in Europe. On May 11, 2007, at CESR’s request, Standard & Poor’s sent an updated letter on its Code compliance and responses to CESR’s first annual report.

CESR plans to meet with rating agencies this fall and issue its second annual report on rating agencies’ compliance with the IOSCO Code by April 30, 2008. On June 22, 2007, CESR published a questionnaire for public input on structured finance ratings and processes. Comments are due by July 31, 2007.

IOSCO conducted a similar review of rating agencies’ implementation of IOSCO’s model Code of Conduct and issued a report for public consultation in February 2007. IOSCO’s draft conclusions on implementation by the major rating agencies are positive overall. Standard & Poor’s submitted its comments on May 11, 2007.

New legislation, regulations or judicial determinations applicable to credit rating agencies in the United States and abroad could affect the competitive position of Standard & Poor’s ratings services; however, the Company does not believe that any new or currently proposed legislation, regulations or judicial determinations would have a materially adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.

The market for credit ratings as well as research, investment advisory and broker-dealer services is very competitive. The Financial Services segment competes domestically and internationally on the basis of a number of factors, including quality of ratings, research and investment advice, client service, reputation, price, geographic scope, range of products and technological innovation. In addition, in some of the countries in which Standard & Poor’s competes, governments may provide financial or other support to locally-based rating agencies and may from time to time establish official credit rating agencies, credit ratings criteria or procedures for evaluating local issuers.

A writ of summons was served on The McGraw-Hill Companies, SRL and on The McGraw-Hill Companies, SA (both indirect subsidiaries of the Company) (collectively, “Standard & Poor’s”) on September 29, 2005 and October 7, 2005, respectively, in an action brought in the Tribunal of Milan, Italy by Enrico Bondi (“Bondi”), the Extraordinary Commissioner of Parmalat Finanziaria S.p.A. and Parmalat S.p.A. (collectively, “Parmalat”). Bondi has brought numerous other lawsuits in both Italy and the United States against entities and individuals who had dealings with Parmalat. In this suit, Bondi claims that Standard & Poor’s, which had issued investment grade ratings on Parmalat until shortly before Parmalat’s collapse in December 2003, breached its duty to issue an independent and professional rating and negligently and knowingly assigned inflated ratings in order to retain Parmalat’s business. Alleging joint and several liability, Bondi claims damages of euros 4,073,984,120 (representing the value of bonds issued by Parmalat and the rating fees paid by Parmalat) with interest, plus damages to be ascertained for Standard & Poor’s alleged complicity in aggravating Parmalat’s financial difficulties and/or for having contributed in bringing about Parmalat’s indebtedness towards its bondholders, and legal fees. The Company believes that Bondi’s allegations and claims for damages lack legal or factual merit. Standard & Poor’s filed its answer, counterclaim and third-party claims on March 16, 2006 and will continue to vigorously contest the action.

In a separate proceeding, the prosecutor’s office in Parma, Italy is conducting an investigation into the bankruptcy of Parmalat. In June 2006, the prosecutor’s office issued a Note of Completion of an Investigation (“Note of Completion”) concerning allegations, based on Standard & Poor’s investment grade ratings of Parmalat, that individual Standard & Poor’s rating analysts conspired with Parmalat insiders and rating advisors to fraudulently or negligently cause the

Folio 26 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Parmalat bankruptcy. The Note of Completion was served on eight Standard & Poor’s rating analysts.

While not a formal charge, the Note of Completion indicates the prosecutor’s intention that the named rating analysts should appear before a judge in Parma for a preliminary hearing, at which hearing the judge will determine whether there is sufficient evidence against the rating analysts to proceed to trial. No date has been set for the preliminary hearing. On July 7, 2006, a defense brief was filed with the Parma prosecutor’s office on behalf of the rating analysts. The Company believes that there is no basis in fact or law to support the allegations against the rating analysts, and they will be vigorously defended by the subsidiaries involved.

In addition, in the normal course of business both in the United States and abroad, the Company and its subsidiaries are defendants in numerous legal proceedings and are involved, from time to time, in governmental and self-regulatory agency proceedings, which may result in adverse judgments, damages, fines or penalties. Also, various governmental and self-regulatory agencies regularly make inquiries and conduct investigations concerning compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Based on information currently known by the Company’s management, the Company does not believe that any pending legal, governmental or self-regulatory proceedings or investigations will result in a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.

Information & Media

	Second — Quarter	% — Increase/	Quarter
(millions of dollars)	2007	(Decrease)	2006
Revenue
Business-to-Business	$ 223.1	7.9	$	206.7
Broadcasting	26.8	(16.0	)	31.9
Total revenue	$ 249.9	4.7	$	238.6
Operating profit	$ 14.7	13.1	$	13.0
% Operating margin	5.9			5.4

In the second quarter 2007, revenue grew by 4.7% or $11.3 million over the prior year while operating profit increased $1.7 million. During 2006, the Sweets building products database was integrated into the McGraw-Hill Construction Network, providing architects, engineers and contractors a powerful new search function for finding, comparing, selecting and purchasing products. This integration transformed Sweets from a primarily print catalog to a bundled print and online service. Historically, Sweets file sales were recognized in the fourth quarter of each year when catalogs were delivered to its customers. Online service revenue is recognized as the service is provided. Sales of the bundled product will be recognized ratably over the service period, primarily 2007. $6.5 million of revenue and $5.8 million of operating profit were recorded in the Business-to-Business Group in the second quarter of 2007 related to the Sweets transformation. In Broadcasting, comparisons to second quarter 2006 are driven by the declines in political advertising and in local and national advertising, particularly in the automotive and services sector. Foreign exchange rates had an immaterial impact on revenue growth and operating profit growth.

At the Business-to-Business Group, revenue in the second quarter increased 7.9% compared to prior year due to growth in oil, natural gas and power news and pricing products and the Sweets transformation. According to the Publishing Information Bureau (PIB), BusinessWeek’s advertising pages in the global edition for the second quarter were down 20.0%, with comparable number of issues year to year for PIB purposes and advertising revenue recognition purposes. BusinessWeek.com continues to improve its performance with

Folio 27 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

increases in advertising compared with the second quarter 2006. The Company continues to make investments in the BusinessWeek.com brand.

Oil, natural gas and power news and pricing products experienced growth as a result of the increased need for market information due to volatility in the price of crude oil and other commodities. The Business-to-Business Group also benefited from the Paris Air Show which occurs in the second quarter of odd numbered years. There was no comparable show in the second quarter of 2006.

The release of new studies in the financial services and the healthcare sectors, increased penetration of existing studies and additional proprietary work in the automotive sector, positively influenced growth for the Business-to-Business Group in the second quarter of 2007 over the same period in 2006.

Through the first six months of 2007, total U.S. construction starts were down 14% versus a year ago. The decline reflected a sharply reduced amount of residential building, which retreated 26%. At the same time, nonresidential building in the January-June period held steady with last year’s first half pace, and nonbuilding construction advanced 4%.

Broadcasting revenue for the quarter declined by 16.0% in 2007 compared to the second quarter of the prior year. Broadcasting benefited in 2006 from political advertising which included proposition advertising in Indiana, Colorado, and California and house and governor races in California. No such comparable events occurred in 2007. Additionally, the Group’s decision not to renew the Oprah Winfrey Show for the San Diego and Denver ABC affiliates negatively impacted growth. Local and national advertising declined primarily due to the automotive and services categories.

Results of Operations — Comparing Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 and 2006

Consolidated Review

The Segment Review that follows is incorporated herein by reference.

Revenue and Operating Profit

	Six Months	%	Six Months
(millions of dollars)	2007	Increase	2006
Revenue	$ 3,014.6	13.0	$ 2,668.2
Operating profit *	$ 763.7	38.6	$ 550.9
% Operating margin	25.3		20.7

• Operating profit is income from operations before taxes on income, interest expense and corporate expense.

In the first six months of 2007 the Company achieved growth in revenue and operating profit of 13.0% and 38.6%, respectively. The increase in revenue is primarily attributable to growth in the Financial Services segment. The six month period reflects the seasonal nature of the Company’s educational publishing operations, with the first quarter being the least significant and the third quarter being the most significant. Foreign exchange rates positively impacted revenue growth by $28.4 million and negatively impacted operating profit growth by $5.0 million.

On March 16, 2007, the Company sold its mutual fund data business, which was part of the Financial Services segment. The sale resulted in a $17.3 million pre-tax gain ($10.3 million after-tax, or $0.03 per diluted share), recorded as Other income. The divestiture of the mutual fund data business is consistent with the Financial Services segment’s strategy of directing resources to those businesses which have the best opportunities to achieve both significant financial growth and market leadership. The divestiture will enable the Financial Services segment to focus on its core business of providing independent research, ratings, data, indices and portfolio services.

The transformation of Sweets to an internet-based sales and marketing solution benefited revenue and operating profit by $13.0 million and $11.6 million, respectively, for the period.

Folio 28 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

The Company implemented Financial Accounting Standard Board’s Statement No. 123(R), Share Based Payment, on January 1, 2006. Included in the 2006 stock-based compensation expense is a one-time charge of $23.8 million from the elimination of the Company’s restoration stock option program.

Product revenue increased 5.4% in the first six months of 2007, due primarily to increases at McGraw-Hill Education.

Product operating-related expenses were flat, which include amortization of prepublication costs, primarily due to the growth in expenses at McGraw-Hill Education from the increase in direct expenses relating to product development, completely offset by cost containment. Amortization of prepublication costs increased by $9.4 million or 12.4%, as compared with same period in 2006, as a result of product mix and adoption cycles.

Product related selling and general expenses increased 5.4%, primarily due to sales opportunities at McGraw-Hill Education. The product margin improved 2.3% mainly due to the improved opportunities at McGraw-Hill Education. The adoption market in 2007 is expected to be between $750 million and $800 million as compared with $685 million in 2006.

Service revenue increased 16.6% in the first six months of 2007, due primarily to a 21.3% increase in Financial Services. Financial Services increased primarily due to the performance of structured finance ratings and corporate (industrial and financial services) and government finance ratings. In the U.S., collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) drove issuance growth in structured finance, while in Europe issuance grew across all asset classes at a double-digit pace. Acquisition related financing drove growth in corporate finance issuance in both industrials and financial services. Public finance issuance was driven by strong new money issuance and refundings. The service margin increased to 34.6%.

Total expenses in the first six months of 2007 increased 6.9% due primarily to the growth in Financial Services.

During 2006, the Company restructured a limited number of business operations to enhance the Corporation’s long-term growth prospects. As a result, in 2006, the Company recorded a restructuring charge of $31.5 million pre-tax, consisting mostly of vacant facilities and employee severance costs of $8.7 million for Information & Media, $16.0 million for McGraw-Hill Education, and $6.8 million for Corporate. The after-tax charge recorded was $19.8 million or $0.06 per share. For the six months ended June 30, 2007, the Company has paid approximately $7.6 million, consisting primarily of employee severance and benefit costs. The remaining reserve at June 30, 2007 was approximately $13.0 million.

In the first six months of 2007, depreciation expense increased 3.3% to $57.7 million as a result of increased depreciation of technology related equipment and facilities. Amortization of intangibles decreased 4.0% to $23.1 million in the first six months of 2007.

Interest expense increased to $13.3 million in the first six months of 2007, compared with $6.0 million in 2006. This increase is attributed to higher average short-term debt borrowings at higher interest rates for the six months ended June 30, 2007. Average total short-term borrowings consisting of commercial paper, extendible commercial notes (ECNs), and promissory note borrowings outstanding for the six months ended June 30, 2007 was $440.1 million at an average interest rate of 5.3%. This compares to average total short-term borrowings consisting of commercial paper outstanding for the six months ended June 30, 2006 of $214.9 million at an average interest rate of 5.0%. There were no ECNs or promissory note borrowings outstanding during the six months ended June 30, 2006 (see Note 7). Included in the first six months of 2007 and 2006 is approximately $4.3 million and $4.5 million, respectively, of interest expense related to the sale leaseback of the Company’s

Folio 29 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

headquarters building in New York City (See Note 11). Also included in the six month periods of 2007 and 2006, is interest income earned on investment balances.

For the six months ended June 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006 the effective tax rate was 37.6% and 37.2%, respectively in each year. The minor increase in the effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2007, compared to the prior period, is primarily attributable to the net effect of several items including the accounting for uncertain tax positions, the non-recurring book gain (a discrete tax item) in connection with the sale of the Company’s mutual fund data business, a state tax audit settlement (a discrete tax item), and an enacted change in the NYS corporate tax laws. The Company adopted the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (FIN 48) on January 1, 2007. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, the Company recognized an increase in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $5.2 million, which was accounted for as a reduction to the January 1, 2007 balance of retained earnings. The total amount of federal, state and local, and foreign unrecognized tax benefits as of January 1, 2007 was $75.1 million. Included in the balance at January 1, 2007, are $13.5 million of tax positions for which the ultimate deductibility is highly certain but for which there is uncertainty about the timing of such deductibility. Because of the impact of deferred tax accounting, other than interest and penalties, the disallowance of the shorter deductibility period would not affect the annual effective tax rate but would accelerate the payment of cash to the taxing authority to an earlier period. The Company recognizes interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in operating expenses. In addition to the unrecognized tax benefits, the Company has approximately $11.0 million and $8.7 million, net of tax benefit, for the payment of interest and penalties accrued as of June 30, 2007 and January 1, 2007, respectively.

The Company expects the effective tax rate to be at 37.5% for the remainder of the year absent the impact of numerous factors including intervening audit settlements, changes in federal, state or foreign law and changes in the locational mix of the Company’s income.

Net income for the six month period increased 42.6% as compared with the similar period in 2006. Diluted earnings per share were $1.18 as compared with $0.79 in 2006. Included in 2007 is the $0.03 after-tax impact of the divestiture of the Financial Services’ mutual fund data business. Included in 2006 is a $0.04 after-tax charge from termination of the Company’s restoration stock program.

McGraw-Hill Education

	Six — Months	%		Six — Months
(millions of dollars)	2007	Increase		2006
Revenue
School Education Group	$ 548.1		2.1	$ 536.9
Higher Education, Professional
and International	430.9		10.8	388.9
Total revenue	$ 979.0		5.7	$ 925.8
Operating loss	($10.3	)	64.8	($29.3	)
% Operating margin	(1.1	)		(3.2	)

Revenue for the McGraw-Hill Education (MHE) segment increased 5.7% over the prior year, while operating loss improved by $19.0 million. The six months ended June 30, 2007 reflects the seasonal nature of the Company’s educational publishing operations, with the first quarter being the least significant, and the third quarter being the most significant. Foreign exchange rates

Folio 30 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

positively impacted revenue growth by $6.6 million and had an immaterial impact on operating loss improvement.

McGraw-Hill Education’s stock-based compensation expense for the six months ended June 30, 2006 included a one-time charge of $4.2 million from the elimination of the Company’s restoration stock option program.

In the first six months of 2007, revenue for the McGraw-Hill School Education Group (SEG) increased $11.2 million or 2.1% as compared with the first six months of 2006. This comparison also reflects the fact that in early 2006 SEG had $9.0 million in Texas sales that had been delayed from the previous year owing to the state’s late funding of the 2005 adoption.

Total U.S. PreK-12 enrollment for 2006-2007 is estimated at 55.0 million students, up 0.5% from 2005-2006, according to the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). The total available state new adoption market in 2007 is estimated at between $750 million and $800 million compared with approximately $685 million in 2006.

The year’s key opportunities in the state new adoption market are primarily offered by math in Texas and science in California. Additionally, science in South Carolina and reading/literature in Tennessee and Indiana provide large opportunities for 2007. Other states, such as North Carolina, offer excellent opportunities in smaller curriculum areas where SEG has a competitive edge in the music, art, and vocational education disciplines.

In the adoption market, strong performances in 6-12 math in Texas, K-12 science in California, K-8 science in South Carolina, K-12 music in North Carolina and K-5 reading in Indiana contributed to SEG’s revenue growth, partially offset by decreased volume in science in Florida. Additionally, sales volume of Open Court Reading declined significantly in California, North Carolina and Texas in 2007 compared to 2006.

In the open territory, SEG had a strong performance in science with wins in preK-5 in Washington DC. In reading/literature, SEG wins included K-5 in Peoria; Arizona; Valley View, Illinois; the Fox School District in Missouri; and Madison, Arizona. Social studies 6-12 was adopted in Washington, DC; and in music, SEG’s Spotlight on Music was adopted in Prince Georges County, Maryland.

According to statistics compiled by the Association of American Publishers (AAP), total net basal and supplementary sales of elementary and secondary instructional materials were down by 7.6% through May 2007 compared to the same period in 2006.

In the testing market, SEG’s custom testing contracts increased over the prior year as additional work related to the new statewide assessment program in Georgia, and additional work on the Indiana, Missouri and Qatar contracts was partially offset by decreased work in New York and discontinuation of the contract in Kentucky. SEG continued to invest in technology to improve efficiencies in developing, delivering, and scoring custom assessments. The non-custom or “shelf” test products volume decreased in the first six months of 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 as shelf scoring declined.

At the McGraw-Hill Higher Education, Professional and International Group (HPI), revenue increased $42.0 million or 10.8% compared to prior year.

For higher education all three imprints, Science, Engineering and Mathematics (SEM), Humanities, Social Science and Languages (HSSL) and Business and Economics (B&E) performed well, with SEM experiencing the highest gain of the three imprints. Key titles contributing to first six months performance included Lucas, The Art of Public Speaking, 9/e ; Sabin, Gregg Reference Manual , 10/e; McConnell, Economics 16/e and 17/e; Knorre, Puntos De Partida , 7/e; Shier, Hole’s Essentials of Human Anatomy and Physiology , 9/e; and Ober, Gregg College Keyboarding , 10/e.

Folio 31 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Contributing to the performance of professional titles were the releases of the McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Science and Technology , 10/e ; Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine, 16e ; Harrison’s Manual of Internal Medicine; Crucial Conversations; and The Millionaire Maker’s Guide to Creating a Cash Machine for Life.

Internationally, strong performance of professional titles in Australia contributed to HPI growth. Also contributing to HPI’s revenue growth in the six month period ending June 30, 2007 were increased adoptions in India and increased higher education volume in Korea and China. Special school funding in British Columbia and Ontario, Canada, which occurred in 2006 did not recur in 2007, affecting comparisons.

Financial Services

	Six — Months	%	Six — Months
(millions of dollars)	2007	Increase	2006
Revenue	$ 1,549.9	21.3	$ 1,277.3
Operating profit	$ 749.4	32.5	$ 565.5
% Operating margin	48.4		44.3

Financial Services revenue and operating profit increased substantially over the first six months of 2006 results. Foreign exchange positively impacted revenue growth by $21.6 million and negatively impacted operating profit growth by $2.3 million, respectively.

The Financial Services’ stock-based compensation expense for the six months ended June 30, 2006 included a one-time charge of $2.1 million from the elimination of the Company’s restoration stock option program.

On March 16, 2007, the Company sold its mutual fund data business, which was part of the Financial Services segment. The sale resulted in a $17.3 million pre-tax gain ($10.3 million after-tax, or $0.03 per diluted share), recorded as Other income. The divestiture of the mutual fund data business is consistent with the Financial Services segment’s strategy of directing resources to those businesses which have the best opportunities to achieve both significant financial growth and market leadership. The divestiture will enable the Financial Services segment to focus on its core business of providing independent research, ratings, data, indices and portfolio services.

The Financial Services segment’s increase in revenue and operating profit was due to the performance of structured finance and corporate (industrial and financial services) and government ratings, which represented approximately 41.4% and 36.3%, respectively, of the growth in revenue. In the U.S., collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) drove issuance growth in structured finance, while in Europe issuance grew across all asset classes at a double-digit pace. Acquisition related financing drove growth in corporate finance issuance in both industrials and financial services. Public finance issuance was driven by strong new money issuance and refundings.

Total U.S. structured finance new issue dollar volume increased 10.7% versus prior year. U.S. CDO issuance increased 93.2%, according to Harrison Scott Publications and Standard & Poor’s internal estimates (Harrison Scott Publications/S&P). Despite weakness in issuance of cash CDOs backed by subprime residential mortgage-backed securities during the second quarter, overall issuance of U.S. CDOs for the first half remained strong due to growth in other sectors such as hybrids and synthetics, as well as issuance of collateralized loan obligations (CLOs)which was fueled by the robust acquisition financing market. U.S. commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) issuance increased 36.8% over the prior year due to higher mortgage originations driven by the low interest rate environment and strong commercial

Folio 32 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

real estate fundamentals as well as rising property values and refinancing of maturing deals. U.S. residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) issuance decreased 11.6%, driven primarily by declines in the subprime and affordability products and home equity sectors. According to Thomson Financial, U.S. corporate issuance by dollar volume for the first half of 2007 increased 42.1%, with investment grade up 40.8% and high yield issuance up 50.4%, driven by continued robust merger and acquisition activity as well as opportunistic financing as issuers took advantage of favorable market conditions. The U.S. municipal market grew 28.7%, as compared with a relatively slow first half of 2006, reflecting increased levels of refunding due to favorable interest rates. Bank loan ratings, derivatives ratings as well as counterparty credit ratings all showed strong growth in the first half.

In Europe, structured finance issuance grew 85.2% as all structured finance asset classes experienced growth, with CDOs, CMBS and RMBS being particularly strong. CDO issuance was driven by a surge in cash CDO deals due in part to a robust market for CLOs. A stable economic backdrop combined with moderate home price growth in most European countries fueled demand for mortgage credit and RMBS volumes picked up as new and existing issuers took advantage of tight spreads. European corporate issuance was up due to solid growth in the industrials and financial services sectors.

Structured finance will continue to drive global growth in 2007 with increases expected in all regions around the world. However, financial market concerns regarding the credit quality of subprime mortgages could adversely impact future debt issuance of residential mortgage backed securities and CDOs backed by subprime RMBS in the United States. On July 10, 2007, Standard & Poor’s placed 612 classes of residential mortgage-backed securities backed by U.S. subprime collateral on CreditWatch with negative implications. Some of these classes have subsequently been downgraded. Standard & Poor’s also indicated that it would assess the impact of these potential negative movements on related asset classes, such as CDOs. Similar actions were taken by other credit ratings agencies as well. Notwithstanding the current market environment in the U.S., the Company had been anticipating a decline in residential mortgage originations as well as a slow down in the rate of growth of CDO issuance versus the significant rates of growth experienced in the past. U.S. residential mortgage backed securities issuance is expected to decline by approximately 20%-30% in the second half of the year which would result in approximately a 15%-20% decline in issuance for the year. Slower growth in U.S. CDO issuance is also expected with growth rates ranging from approximately 15%-20% for the balance of the year. U.S. CDO growth for the year is expected to range between approximately 40-45% versus 93% in the first half of 2007. The outlook for both asset classes as well as others is dependent upon many factors including the general condition of the economy, interest rates, credit quality and spreads, and the level of liquidity in the financial markets.

Standard & Poor’s is a leading provider of data, analysis and independent investment advice and recommendations. Securities information products such as RatingsXpress and RatingsDirect performed well as customer demand for fixed income data increased. The Capital IQ product showed growth with the number of clients increasing 28.9% versus June 30, 2006 and 12.2% over year-end 2006. Market conditions continued to be challenging in equity research.

Revenue related to Standard & Poor’s indices increased as assets under management for exchange-traded funds (ETFs) rose 20.9% from June 30, 2006 to $178.6 billion as of June 30, 2007. ETF assets under management at December 31, 2006 were $167.3 billion.

The financial services industry is subject to the potential for increasing regulation in the United States and abroad. The businesses conducted by the Financial Services segment are in certain cases regulated under the Credit Rating Agency Reform Act of 2006, U.S. Investment Advisers Act of 1940, the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the National Association of Securities Dealers

Folio 33 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

and/or the laws of the states or other jurisdictions in which they conduct business.

Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services is a credit rating agency that has been designated as one of seven Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations, or NRSROs, by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The SEC first began designating NRSROs in 1975, for use of their credit ratings, in the determination of capital charges for registered brokers and dealers under the SEC’s Net Capital Rule. During the last five years, the SEC has been examining the purpose of and the need for greater regulation of NRSROs. During this period, the SEC issued a report on the role and function of credit rating agencies, a concept release that questioned whether the SEC should continue to designate NRSROs for regulatory purposes, and a rule proposal to define NRSROs.

Credit rating agency legislation entitled “Credit Rating Agency Reform Act of 2006” was signed into law by President Bush on September 29, 2006. The legislation creates a new SEC registration system for rating agencies that want to be treated as NRSROs. Eligible agencies include those with business models different from the existing NRSROs, including Standard & Poor’s. Registrants, including existing NRSROs, will need to submit policies, methodologies, performance data and other materials the SEC requires under the new rules issued in final form in June 2007. New firms must provide evidence that certain capital market participants regard them as issuers of quality credit opinions. The SEC will have a limited time to deny an application. Registered NRSROs will need to certify annually as to the accuracy of application materials and list material changes. The SEC is given new, expansive authority and oversight of NRSROs and will be able to censure NRSROs, revoke their registration or limit or suspend their registration in certain cases. The SEC is not supposed to be injected into the analytical process, ratings criteria or methodology. Importantly, an agency’s decision to register and comply with the law will not constitute a waiver of or diminish any right, defense or privilege available under applicable law. Pre-emption language is included consistent with other legal precedent. The Company does not believe this legislation will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.

On February 5, 2007, the SEC issued proposed rules to implement the 2006 legislation and a draft Form NRSRO for applicants to complete in registering with the SEC. Public comments were due by March 12, 2007. Standard & Poor’s submitted comments on March 12, 2007 and submitted a second set of comments on March 26, 2007. On May 23, 2007, the SEC voted to adopt the proposed rules and application form. The effective date of Form NRSRO and rules relating to it was June 18, 2007; the remaining rules were effective on June 26, 2007. Standard & Poor’s submitted its application on Form NRSRO on June 25, 2007 and expects to receive the SEC’s decision by late September. Standard & Poor’s will continue to be an NRSRO under the prior regime until the SEC determines its application.

The legal status of rating agencies has also been addressed by courts in the United States in various decisions and is likely to be considered and addressed in legal proceedings from time to time in the future.

Outside the United States, particularly in Europe, regulators and government officials also have reviewed whether credit rating agencies should be subject to formal oversight. In the past several years, the European Commission, the Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) have issued reports, consultations and questionnaires on the role of credit agencies and potential regulation. IOSCO’s review culminated in December 2004 with its Code of Conduct Fundamentals for rating agencies. Standard & Poor’s worked closely with IOSCO in its drafting of the code and earlier principles on which the code was based. In October 2005, Standard & Poor’s replaced its existing code of practices and procedures with a new Ratings Services Code of Conduct which is consistent with the IOSCO Code. In February 2006, Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services published a report concerning implementation of its Code of Conduct. Standard & Poor’s met with representatives of CESR in June 2006 to discuss the Ratings Services Code of Conduct and Implementation Report. In July 2006, CESR published a questionnaire

Folio 34 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

for comment on rating agencies’ codes of conduct and implementation. CESR published the comments it received last fall. In December 2006, pursuant to a request by the European Commission, CESR issued its first annual report to the European Commission on compliance by credit rating agencies with the IOSCO Code. CESR concluded that the four agencies it reviewed (Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services, Moody’s Investors Service, Fitch Ratings and Dominion Bond Rating Service) are largely compliant with the IOSCO Code. CESR noted areas for improvement and plans to review these areas in 2007. CESR stated it will also assess in its next report the impact of the new U.S. law and SEC rules on the ratings industry in Europe. On May 11, 2007, at CESR’s request, Standard & Poor’s sent an updated letter on its Code compliance and responses to CESR’s first annual report.

CESR plans to meet with rating agencies this fall and issue its second annual report on rating agencies’ compliance with the IOSCO Code by April 30, 2008. On June 22, 2007, CESR published a questionnaire for public input on structured finance ratings and processes. Comments are due by July 31, 2007.

IOSCO conducted a similar review of rating agencies’ implementation of IOSCO’s model Code of Conduct and issued a report for public consultation in February 2007. IOSCO’s draft conclusions on implementation by the major rating agencies are positive overall. Standard & Poor’s submitted its comments on May 11, 2007.

New legislation, regulations or judicial determinations applicable to credit rating agencies in the United States and abroad could affect the competitive position of Standard & Poor’s ratings services; however, the Company does not believe that any new or currently proposed legislation, regulations or judicial determinations would have a materially adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.

The market for credit ratings as well as research, investment advisory and broker-dealer services is very competitive. The Financial Services segment competes domestically and internationally on the basis of a number of factors, including quality of ratings, research and investment advice, client service, reputation, price, geographic scope, range of products and technological innovation. In addition, in some of the countries in which Standard & Poor’s competes, governments may provide financial or other support to locally-based rating agencies and may from time to time establish official credit rating agencies, credit ratings criteria or procedures for evaluating local issuers.

A writ of summons was served on The McGraw-Hill Companies, SRL and on The McGraw-Hill Companies, SA (both indirect subsidiaries of the Company) (collectively, “Standard & Poor’s”) on September 29, 2005 and October 7, 2005, respectively, in an action brought in the Tribunal of Milan, Italy by Enrico Bondi (“Bondi”), the Extraordinary Commissioner of Parmalat Finanziaria S.p.A. and Parmalat S.p.A. (collectively, “Parmalat”). Bondi has brought numerous other lawsuits in both Italy and the United States against entities and individuals who had dealings with Parmalat. In this suit, Bondi claims that Standard & Poor’s, which had issued investment grade ratings on Parmalat until shortly before Parmalat’s collapse in December 2003, breached its duty to issue an independent and professional rating and negligently and knowingly assigned inflated ratings in order to retain Parmalat’s business. Alleging joint and several liability, Bondi claims damages of euros 4,073,984,120 (representing the value of bonds issued by Parmalat and the rating fees paid by Parmalat) with interest, plus damages to be ascertained for Standard & Poor’s alleged complicity in aggravating Parmalat’s financial difficulties and/or for having contributed in bringing about Parmalat’s indebtedness towards its bondholders, and legal fees. The Company believes that Bondi’s allegations and claims for damages lack legal or factual merit. Standard & Poor’s filed its answer, counterclaim and third-party claims on March 16, 2006 and will continue to vigorously contest the action.

In a separate proceeding, the prosecutor’s office in Parma, Italy is conducting an investigation into the bankruptcy of Parmalat. In June 2006, the prosecutor’s office issued a Note of Completion of an Investigation (“Note of Completion”) concerning allegations, based on Standard & Poor’s investment grade ratings of

Folio 35 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Parmalat, that individual Standard & Poor’s rating analysts conspired with Parmalat insiders and rating advisors to fraudulently or negligently cause the Parmalat bankruptcy. The Note of Completion was served on eight Standard & Poor’s rating analysts.

While not a formal charge, the Note of Completion indicates the prosecutor’s intention that the named rating analysts should appear before a judge in Parma for a preliminary hearing, at which hearing the judge will determine whether there is sufficient evidence against the rating analysts to proceed to trial. No date has been set for the preliminary hearing. On July 7, 2006, a defense brief was filed with the Parma prosecutor’s office on behalf of the rating analysts. The Company believes that there is no basis in fact or law to support the allegations against the rating analysts, and they will be vigorously defended by the subsidiaries involved.

In addition, in the normal course of business both in the United States and abroad, the Company and its subsidiaries are defendants in numerous legal proceedings and are involved, from time to time, in governmental and self-regulatory agency proceedings, which may result in adverse judgments, damages, fines or penalties. Also, various governmental and self-regulatory agencies regularly make inquiries and conduct investigations concerning compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Based on information currently known by the Company’s management, the Company does not believe that any pending legal, governmental or self-regulatory proceedings or investigations will result in a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.

Information & Media

	Six — Months	% — Increase/	Months
(millions of dollars)	2007	(Decrease)	2006
Revenue
Business-to-Business	$ 435.2	7.7	$	404.1
Broadcasting	50.5	(17.2	)	61.0
Total revenue	$ 485.7	4.4	$	465.1
Operating profit	$ 24.6	67.3	$	14.7
% Operating margin	5.1			3.1

In the first six months of 2007, revenue grew by 4.4% or $20.6 million over the prior year while operating profit increased $9.9 million. During 2006, the Sweets building products database was integrated into the McGraw-Hill Construction Network, providing architects, engineers and contractors a powerful new search function for finding, comparing, selecting and purchasing products. This integration transformed Sweets from a primarily print catalog to a bundled print and online service. Historically, Sweets file sales were recognized in the fourth quarter of each year when catalogs were delivered to its customers. Online service revenue is recognized as the service is provided. Sales of the bundled product will be recognized ratably over the service period, primarily 2007. $13.0 million of revenue and $11.6 million of operating profit were recorded in the Business-to-Business Group in the first half of 2007 related to the Sweets transformation. In Broadcasting, comparisons to the first six months of 2006 are driven by the declines in local and national advertising, particularly in the automotive sector. Foreign exchange rates had an immaterial impact on revenue growth and a negative impact of $2.2 million on segment operating profit growth.

Information & Media’s stock-based compensation expense for the six months ended June 30, 2006 included a one-time charge of $2.7 million from the elimination of the Company’s restoration stock option program.

At the Business-to-Business Group, revenue in the first six months of 2007 increased 7.7% compared to prior year due to growth in oil, natural gas and power news and pricing products and the Sweets transformation. According to

Folio 36 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

the Publishing Information Bureau (PIB), BusinessWeek’s advertising pages in the global edition for the first six months of 2007 were down 12.6%, with comparable number of issues year to year for PIB purposes and advertising revenue recognition purposes. BusinessWeek.com continues to improve its performance with increases in advertising compared with the first half of 2006. The Company continues to make investments in the BusinessWeek.com brand.

Oil, natural gas and power news and pricing products experienced growth as a result of the increased need for market information due to volatility in the price of crude oil and other commodities.

The release of new studies in the financial services and the healthcare sectors, increased penetration of existing studies and additional proprietary work in the automotive sector, positively influenced growth for the Business-to-Business Group in the first six months of 2007 over the same period in 2006.

Through the first six months of 2007, total U.S. construction starts were down 14% versus a year ago. The decline reflected a sharply reduced amount of residential building, which retreated 26%. At the same time, nonresidential building in the January-June period held steady with last year’s first half pace, and nonbuilding construction advanced 4%.

Broadcasting revenue for the first six months of 2007 declined by 17.2% compared to the same period in the prior year. Broadcasting benefited in 2006 from political advertising which included proposition advertising in Indiana, Colorado and California, governors races in California and Colorado and house races in Indiana, Colorado and California. No such comparable events occurred in 2007. Additionally, the Group’s decision not to renew the Oprah Winfrey Show for the San Diego and Denver markets in 2007 and the airing of the 2006 Super Bowl on ABC, negatively impacted growth. Local and national advertising declined, with the largest declines in the automotive and services sectors.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company continues to maintain a strong financial position. The Company’s primary source of funds for operations is cash generated by operating activities. The Company’s core businesses have been strong cash generators. Income and consequently cash provided from operations during the year are significantly impacted by the seasonality of businesses, particularly educational publishing. This seasonality also impacts cash flow and related borrowing patterns. The Company’s cash flow is typically greater in the second half of the year than in the first half of the year. Debt financing is used as necessary for acquisitions and for seasonal fluctuations in working capital. Cash and cash equivalents were $358.1 million at June 30, 2007, an increase of $4.6 million from December 31, 2006. Most of the cash and equivalents as of June 30, 2007 are held outside the United States. The Company’s subsidiaries maintain cash balances at financial institutions located throughout the world. These cash balances are subject to normal currency exchange fluctuations. Typically, cash held outside the U.S. is anticipated to be utilized to fund international operations or to be reinvested outside the U.S. as a significant portion of the Company’s opportunities for growth in the coming years are expected to be abroad.

Cash Flow

Operating Activities: Cash provided by operations was $388.5 million for the first six months of 2007, as compared to $293.3 million in 2006. The change in cash from operating activities is primarily the result of growth in income from operations and strong cash collections.

Accounts receivable (before reserves) increased $49.7 million from the prior year-end, primarily due to the seasonality of the educational business and

Folio 37 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

growth in the financial services. The increase in accounts receivable (before reserves) was partially offset by strong cash collections. This increase compares to an increase of $15.4 million in 2006 from the 2005 year-end. Year-to-date, the number of day’s sales outstanding has deteriorated by 1 day year over year. This deterioration is the result of an increase in the proportion of non-U.S. accounts receivable. Inventories increased by $98.9 million from the end of 2006 as the Company’s education business prepares for its selling season. The increase in inventories over the prior year is primarily the result of the stronger adoption opportunities in 2007 compared with 2006.

Accounts payable and accrued expenses decreased by $187.4 million over the prior year-end primarily due to the timing of first quarter performance based compensation payments. This decrease compares to a $272.0 million decrease in 2006. Deferred taxes reduced cash from operations by $60.7 million primarily as a result of deferred tax assets relating to the accounting for share-based compensation in accordance with Statement No. 123(R).

Investing Activities: Cash used for investing activities was $208.8 million and $156.6 million in the first six months of 2007 and 2006, respectively. The change over the prior year is primarily due to purchases of property and equipment, and acquisition activity, partially offset by the disposition of the mutual fund data business.

Purchases of property and equipment totaled $83.4 million in the first six months of 2007 compared with $32.2 million in 2006. For 2007, capital expenditures are expected to be approximately $250 million and primarily relate to increased investment in the Company’s information technology data centers and other technology initiatives, a well as the new McGraw-Hill Education facility in Iowa.

Net prepublication costs increased $50.1 million to $557.9 million from December 31, 2006, as spending outpaced amortization. Prepublication investment in the current year totaled $132.6 million as of June 30, 2007, $7.6 million more than the same period in 2006. Prepublication investment for 2007 is expected to be approximately $310 million, reflecting the significant adoption opportunities in key states in 2007 and beyond.

Financing Activities: Cash used for financing activities was $182.7 million as of June 30, 2007 compared to $671.7 million in 2006. The difference is primarily attributable to the increased borrowings consisting of commercial paper, promissory note and extendible commercial note borrowings. In 2007, cash was utilized to repurchase approximately 18.1 million shares for $1.2 billion on a settlement basis. An additional 1.4 million shares were repurchased in the second quarter of 2007, which settled in July 2007 bringing the total repurchase to 19.5 million shares for $1.3 billion on a trade date basis. On a settlement basis, cash was utilized to repurchase approximately 25.5 million shares for $1.4 billion in the first six months of 2006. Shares repurchased under the repurchase program were used for general corporate purposes, including the issuance of shares for stock compensation plans and to offset the dilutive effect of the exercise of employee stock options.

Commercial paper borrowings as of June 30, 2007 totaled $536.1 million, a decrease from $678.6 million at the same point in 2006. Commercial paper borrowings are supported by the Company’s five-year revolving credit facility agreement of $1.2 billion which expires on July 20, 2009. The Company pays a facility fee of seven basis points on the credit facility whether or not amounts have been borrowed, and borrowings may be made at a spread of 13 basis points above the prevailing LIBOR rates. This spread increases to 18 basis points for borrowings exceeding 50% of the total capacity available under the facility. The facility contains certain covenants, and the only financial covenant requires that the Company not exceed indebtedness to cash flow ratio, as defined, of 4 to 1 at any time. This restriction has never been exceeded. There were no borrowings under this agreement as of June 30, 2007 and 2006.

Folio 38 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

In addition, there were $66.1 million in extendible commercial note borrowings (ECNs) outstanding at June 30, 2007. There were no ECNs borrowings outstanding at June 30, 2006. The Company has the capacity to issue ECNs of up to $240 million. ECNs replicate commercial paper, except that the Company has an option to extend the note beyond its initial redemption date to a maximum final maturity of 390 days. However, if exercised, such an extension is at a higher reset rate, which is at a predetermined spread over LIBOR and is related to the Company’s commercial paper rating at the time of extension. As a result of the extension option, no backup facilities for these borrowings are required. As is the case with commercial paper, ECNs have no financial covenants.

On April 19, 2007, the Company signed a promissory note with one of its providers of banking services to enable the Company to borrow additional funds, on an uncommitted basis, from time to time to supplement its commercial paper and ECNs borrowings. The specific terms (principal, interest rate and maturity date) of each borrowing governed by this promissory note is determined on the borrowing date of each loan. There were $392 million of borrowings outstanding under this promissory note at June 30, 2007. There were no promissory note borrowings outstanding at June 30, 2006.

Under the shelf registration that became effective with the Securities and Exchange Commission in 1990, an additional $250 million of debt securities can be issued.

On April 11, 2006, the Company announced it terminated the restoration feature of its stock option program on March 30, 2006. The Board of Directors voted to eliminate restoration stock options in an effort to reduce future expenses the Company will incur under Statement No. 123(R). Additionally, the Company has reshaped its long-term incentive compensation program to emphasize the use of restricted performance stock over employee stock options.

On January 24, 2006, the Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program authorizing the purchase of up to 45 million additional shares, which was approximately 12.1% of the total shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock. The repurchased shares may be used for general corporate purposes, including the issuance of shares in connection with the exercise of employee stock options. Purchases under this program may be made from time to time on the open market and in private transactions depending on market conditions. At December 31, 2006, authorization for the repurchase of 20 million shares remained under the 2006 program. On January 31, 2007, the Board of Directors approved a new stock repurchase program (2007 program) authorizing the repurchase of up to 45 million additional shares. The Company repurchased 19.5 million shares (on a trade date basis) from the 2006 program during the first half of 2007 for $1,273.9 million at an average price of $65.33 per share.

On January 31, 2007, the Board of Directors approved an increase of 12.9% in the quarterly common stock dividend from $0.1815 to $0.2050 per share.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk

The Company is exposed to market risk from changes in foreign exchange rates. The Company has operations in various foreign countries. The functional currency is the local currency for all locations, except in the McGraw-Hill Education segment, where operations that are extensions of the parent have the U.S. dollar as the functional currency. For hyper-inflationary economies, the functional currency is the U.S. dollar. In the normal course of business, these operations are exposed to fluctuations in currency values. The Company does not generally enter into derivative financial instruments in the normal course of business, nor are such instruments used for speculative purposes. The Company has no such instruments outstanding at this time.

The Company has naturally hedged positions in most countries from a local currency perspective with offsetting assets and liabilities. The gross amount of the Company’s foreign exchange balance sheet exposure from operations is $183.3 million as of June 30, 2007. Management has estimated using an undiversified value-at-risk analysis with 95% certainty that the foreign exchange gains and losses should not exceed $18.3 million over the next year based on the historical volatilities of the portfolio.

Folio 39 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

The Company’s net interest expense is sensitive to changes in the general level of U.S. and foreign interest rates. Based on average debt and investments outstanding over the past three months, the following is the projected annual impact on interest expense on current operations (a rise in rates would result in an unfavorable impact and a decrease in rates would result in a favorable impact as the Company is in a net borrowing position at the present time):

Percent change in interest rates	Projected annual pre-tax impact on
(+/-)	operations (millions)
1%	$ 5.3

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Statement No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS No. 159”) to provide companies with an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value. The objective of SFAS No. 159 is to reduce both the complexity in accounting for financial instruments and the volatility in earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years that begin after November 15, 2007 which for the Company is January 1, 2008 and will be applied prospectively. The Company is currently evaluating the impact SFAS No. 159 will have on its Consolidated Financial Statements and is not yet in a position to determine what, if any, effects SFAS No. 159 will have on the Consolidated Financial Statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”) to clarify the definition of fair value, establish a framework for measuring fair value and expand the disclosures on fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. SFAS No. 157 also stipulates that, as a market-based measurement, fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, and establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between (a) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs) and (b) the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years that begin after November 15, 2007 which for the Company is January 1, 2008 and will be applied prospectively. The Company is currently evaluating the impact SFAS No. 157 will have on its Consolidated Financial Statements and is not yet in a position to determine what, if any, effects SFAS No. 157 will have on the Consolidated Financial Statements.

In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) released FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”) which became effective for and was adopted by the Company as of January 1, 2007. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting and reporting for uncertainties in income taxes and prescribes a comprehensive model for the financial statement recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns. The Company recognizes interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in operating expenses. For further information regarding the effects of adopting FIN 48 see Note 12.

In June 2006, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) reached a consensus on EITF No. 06-3, “How Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities Should Be Presented in the Income Statement” (“EITF No. 06-3”) which became effective for the Company as of January 1, 2007. EITF No. 06-3 provides that taxes imposed by a governmental authority on a revenue producing transaction

Folio 40 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

between a seller and a customer should be shown in the income statement on either a gross or a net basis, based on the entity’s accounting policy, which should be disclosed pursuant to Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 22, “Disclosure of Accounting Policies.” The Company will continue to present taxes within the scope of EITF No. 06-3 on a net basis. As such, the adoption of EITF No. 06-3 did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Since the date of the annual report, there have been no other material changes to the Company’s critical accounting policies.

“Safe Harbor” Statement Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995

This section, as well as other portions of this document, includes certain forward-looking statements about the Company’s businesses, new products, sales, expenses, tax rates, cash flows and operating and capital requirements. Such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: the strength and sustainability of the U.S. and global economy; Educational Publishing’s level of success in 2007 adoptions and in open territories and enrollment and demographic trends; the level of educational funding; the level of education technology investments; the strength of School Education, Higher Education, Professional and International publishing markets and the impact of technology on them; the level of interest rates and the strength of the economic recovery, profit levels and the capital markets in the U.S. and abroad; the level of success of new product development and global expansion and strength of domestic and international markets; the demand and market for debt ratings, including collateralized debt obligations (CDO), residential mortgage and asset-backed securities and related asset classes; the regulatory environment affecting Standard & Poor’s; the level of merger and acquisition activity in the U.S. and abroad; the strength of the domestic and international advertising markets; the volatility of the energy marketplace; the contract value of public works, manufacturing and single-family unit construction; the level of political advertising; and the level of future cash flow, debt levels, product-related manufacturing expenses, pension expense, distribution expenses, postal rates, prepublication, amortization and depreciation expense, income tax rates, capital, technology, restructuring charges and other expenditures and prepublication cost investment.

Actual results may differ materially from those in any forward-looking statements because any such statements involve risks and uncertainties and are subject to change based upon various important factors, including, but not limited to, worldwide economic, financial, political and regulatory conditions; currency and foreign exchange volatility; the health of capital and equity markets, including future interest rate changes and concerns regarding the credit quality of subprime mortgages adversely impacting future debt issuances of U.S. residential mortgage backed securities and CDOs backed by subprime residential mortgages and related asset classes; the implementation of an expanded regulatory scheme affecting Standard & Poor’s ratings and services; the level of funding in the education market (both domestically and internationally); the pace of recovery in advertising; continued investment by the construction, computer and aviation industries; the successful marketing of new products, and the effect of competitive products and pricing.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The Company has no material changes to the disclosure made on this matter in the Company’s report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Folio 41 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Please see the financial condition section in Item 2 of this Form 10-Q for additional market risk disclosures.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

As of June 30, 2007, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the CEO and CFO, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based on that evaluation, the Company’s management, including the CEO and CFO, concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2007.

Other Matters

There have been no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting during the most recent quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Folio 42 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Part II Other Information

Item 1 . Legal Proceedings

A writ of summons was served on The McGraw-Hill Companies, SRL and on The McGraw-Hill Companies, SA (both indirect subsidiaries of the Company) (collectively, “Standard & Poor’s”) on September 29, 2005 and October 7, 2005, respectively, in an action brought in the Tribunal of Milan, Italy by Enrico Bondi (“Bondi”), the Extraordinary Commissioner of Parmalat Finanziaria S.p.A. and Parmalat S.p.A. (collectively, “Parmalat”). Bondi has brought numerous other lawsuits in both Italy and the United States against entities and individuals who had dealings with Parmalat. In this suit, Bondi claims that Standard & Poor’s, which had issued investment grade ratings of Parmalat until shortly before Parmalat’s collapse in December 2003, breached its duty to issue an independent and professional rating and negligently and knowingly assigned inflated ratings in order to retain Parmalat’s business. Alleging joint and several liability, Bondi claims damages of euros 4,073,984,120 (representing the value of bonds issued by Parmalat and the rating fees paid by Parmalat) with interest, plus damages to be ascertained for Standard & Poor’s alleged complicity in aggravating Parmalat’s financial difficulties and/or for having contributed in bringing about Parmalat’s indebtedness towards its bondholders, and legal fees. The Company believes that Bondi’s allegations and claims for damages lack legal or factual merit. Standard & Poor’s filed its answer, counterclaim and third-party claims on March 16, 2006 and will continue to vigorously contest the action.

In a separate proceeding, the prosecutor’s office in Parma, Italy is conducting an investigation into the bankruptcy of Parmalat. In June 2006, the prosecutor’s office issued a Note of Completion of an Investigation (“Note of Completion”) concerning allegations, based on Standard & Poor’s investment grade ratings of Parmalat, that individual Standard & Poor’s rating analysts conspired with Parmalat insiders and rating advisors to fraudulently or negligently cause the Parmalat bankruptcy. The Note of Completion was served on eight Standard & Poor’s rating analysts.

While not a formal charge, the Note of Completion indicates the prosecutor’s intention that the named rating analysts should appear before a judge in Parma for a preliminary hearing, at which hearing the judge will determine whether there is sufficient evidence against the rating analysts to proceed to trial. No date has been set for the preliminary hearing. On July 7, 2006, a defense brief was filed with the Parma prosecutor’s office on behalf of the rating analysts. The Company believes that there is no basis in fact or law to support the allegations against the rating analysts, and they will be vigorously defended by the subsidiaries involved.

In addition, in the normal course of business both in the United States and abroad, the Company and its subsidiaries are defendants in numerous legal proceedings and are involved, from time to time, in governmental and self-regulatory agency proceedings, which may result in adverse judgments, damages, fines or penalties. Also, various governmental and self-regulatory agencies regularly make inquiries and conduct investigations concerning compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Based on information currently known by the Company’s management, the Company does not believe that any pending legal, governmental or self-regulatory proceedings or investigations will result in a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.

Folio 43 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Item 2 . Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

On January 24, 2006, the Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program authorizing the purchase of up to 45 million shares, which was approximately 12.1% of the total shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock as of January 24, 2006. As of December 31, 2006, 20 million shares remained available under the 2006 repurchase program. On January 31, 2007 the Board of Directors approved a new stock repurchase program authorizing the purchase of up to 45 million additional shares, which was approximately 12.7% of the total shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock as of January 31, 2007. In the first quarter of 2007, the Company repurchased 13.2 million shares under the 2006 program. The repurchase programs have no expiration date. The repurchased shares may be used for general corporate purposes, including the issuance of shares in connection with the exercise of employee stock options. Purchases under this program may be made from time to time on the open market and in private transactions, depending on market conditions.

The following table provides information on purchases made by the Company of its outstanding common stock during the second quarter of 2007 pursuant to the stock repurchase program authorized by the Board of Directors on January 24, 2006 (column c). In addition to purchases under the 2006 stock repurchase program, the number of shares in column (a) include: 1) shares of common stock that are tendered to the Registrant to satisfy the employees’ tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of awards of restricted performance shares (such shares are repurchased by the Registrant based on their fair market value on the vesting date), and 2) shares of the Registrant deemed surrendered to the Registrant to pay the exercise price and to satisfy the employees’ tax withholding obligations in connection with the exercise of employee stock options. There were no other share repurchases during the quarter outside the stock repurchases noted below:

			(c)Total Number of	(d) Maximum Number — of Shares that may
			Shares Purchased as	yet be
	(a)Total Number		Part of Publicly	Purchased Under
	of Shares Purchased	(b)Average Price	Announced Programs	the Programs
Period	(in millions)	Paid per Share	(in millions)	(in millions)
(April 1—
April 30, 2007)	—	—	—	51.8
(May 1—
May 31, 2007)	2.3	$ 67.99	2.3	49.5
(June 1—
June 30, 2007)	4.0	$ 68.82	4.0	45.5
Total — Qtr	6.3	$ 68.51	6.3	45.5

Folio 44 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Item 4 . Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

| (a) | The 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Registrant was held on April 25,
2007. |
| --- | --- |
| (b) | The following nominees, having received the FOR votes set forth opposite their
respective names, constituting a plurality of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting for
the election of Directors, were duly elected Directors of the Registrant: |

DIRECTOR — Pedro Aspe	214,152,025	98,301,858
Robert P. McGraw	215,040,079	97,413,804
Hilda Ochoa-Brillembourg	215,384,286	97,069,597
Edward B. Rust, Jr.	213,112,255	99,341,628

	The terms of office of the following Directors continued after the meeting:
	Sir Winfried F. W. Bischoff, Douglas N. Daft, Linda Koch Lorimer, Harold McGraw III,
James H. Ross, Kurt L. Schmoke and Sidney Taurel.
(c)	Shareholders ratified the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm for the Registrant and its subsidiaries for 2007.
The vote was 299,037,823 shares FOR and 11,466,766 shares AGAINST, with 1,949,294
shares abstaining.
(d)	The shareholder proposal requesting a shareholder vote on the annual election
of each Director received the following number of votes: 219,583,431 shares FOR and
63,279,377 shares AGAINST, with 2,784,200 shares abstaining.
(e)	The shareholder proposal requesting adoption of a simple majority vote received
the following number of votes: 211,263,916 shares FOR and 71,456,942 shares AGAINST,
with 2,926,150 shares abstaining.
(f)	The shareholder proposal requesting public disclosure of corporate policies and
procedures regarding political contributions and the amount of such contributions
received the following number of votes: 91,658,813 shares FOR and 150,259,028 shares
AGAINST, with 43,729,167 shares abstaining.
	There were 26,806,875 broker non-votes with respect to items (d), (e), and (f).

Folio 45 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Item 6 . Exhibits

(15)	Letter on Unaudited Interim Financials
(31.1)	Quarterly Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(31.2)	Quarterly Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(32)	Quarterly Certification of the Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Folio 46 /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date: July 27, 2007	THE MCGRAW-HILL COMPANIES, INC. — By	/s/ Robert J. Bahash
		Robert J. Bahash
		Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
Date: July 27, 2007	By	/s/ Kenneth M. Vittor
		Kenneth M. Vittor
		Executive Vice President
and General Counsel
Date: July 27, 2007	By	/s/ Talia M. Griep
		Talia M. Griep
		Corporate Controller
and Senior Vice President,
Global Business Services and
Financial Planning

Folio 47 /Folio