Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

SONOCO PRODUCTS CO Proxy Solicitation & Information Statement 2008

Mar 14, 2008

31090_psi_2008-03-14_c61fcd91-3ecc-46a6-8b96-a443a44cc697.zip

Proxy Solicitation & Information Statement

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

DEF 14A 1 g10750ddef14a.htm SONOCO PRODUCTS COMPANY Sonoco Products Company PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN LOGICAL PAGE

Schedule 14A

(Rule 14A-101)

Information Required In Proxy Statement

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (AMENDMENT NO. )

Filed by the Registrant þ

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o

Check the appropriate box:

o Preliminary Proxy Statement o Confidential, For Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) þ Definitive Proxy Statement o Definitive Additional Materials o Soliciting Material Under Rule 14a-12

Sonoco Products Company

callerid=999 iwidth=455 length=0

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

callerid=999 iwidth=455 length=0

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

PAYMENT OF FILING FEE (Check the appropriate box):

þ No fee required
o Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.

1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

callerid=999 iwidth=455 length=0

2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

callerid=999 iwidth=455 length=0

3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

callerid=999 iwidth=455 length=0

4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

callerid=999 iwidth=455 length=0

5) Total Fee Paid:

callerid=999 iwidth=455 length=0

o Fee paid previously with preliminary materials:
o Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by
Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its
filing

1) Amount Previously Paid:

callerid=999 iwidth=455 length=0

2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

callerid=999 iwidth=455 length=0

3) Filing Party:

callerid=999 iwidth=455 length=0

4) Date Filed:

callerid=999 iwidth=455 length=0

END LOGICAL PAGE PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

END PAGE WIDTH

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

SONOCO PRODUCTS COMPANY

1 NORTH SECOND STREET HARTSVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA 29550 USA

March 14, 2008

To Our Shareholders:

You are cordially invited to attend our Annual Shareholders’ Meeting to be held at the Center Theater, 212 North Fifth Street, Hartsville, South Carolina, on Wednesday, April 16, 2008, at 11:00 a.m. (Eastern time).

We have enclosed a Notice of 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement that cover the details of matters to be presented at the meeting.

In addition to acting on the matters listed in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders, we will discuss the Company’s progress, and you will be given an opportunity to ask questions of general interest to all shareholders.

We have also enclosed a copy of our 2007 Annual Report , which reviews the Company’s past year’s events and discusses strategy and the outlook for the future (or we delivered one copy of the Annual Report for all shareholders at your address).

We hope that you will come to the 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders in person; however, even if you plan to attend, we strongly encourage you to complete the enclosed proxy card or brokers’ voting instruction form and return it in the enclosed business reply envelope. If you are a shareholder of record, you can also vote by telephone (if you live in the United States or Canada) or via the Internet. Instructions are shown on your proxy card. If you are a shareholder of record and later find you can be present or if for any reason you desire to revoke your proxy, you can do so at any time before the voting. Your vote is important and will be greatly appreciated.

Harris E. DeLoach, Jr. Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer

END PAGE WIDTH

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

NOTICE OF 2008 ANNUAL

MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

and

PROXY STATEMENT

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

TOC

TABLE OF CONTENTS

NOTICE OF 2008 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS 3
PROXY STATEMENT 5
Information Concerning the Solicitation 5
Election of Directors 7
Information Concerning Directors Whose Terms
Continue 9
Corporate Governance 12
Director Independence Policies 12
Meetings of Non-Management Directors 13
Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics 13
Director Nomination Process 13
Communications with the Board of Directors 14
Board Meetings and Committees of the Board 15
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation 22
Related Party Transactions 22
Security Ownership of Management 24
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial
Owners 26
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance 26
Management Compensation 27
Compensation Discussion and Analysis 27
Compensation Committee Report 45
Summary Compensation Table 46
2007 Grants of Plan-Based Awards 49
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2007 Fiscal
Year-End 50
2007 Option Exercises and Stock Vested 52
Pension Benefits 53
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation 56
Potential Benefits Payable Immediately Upon
Certain Separation Events 59
Director Compensation 61
Director Compensation Table 62
Non-Employee Directors Outstanding Equity Awards
at Fiscal Year-End (12/31/2007) 64
Approval of the 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan 65
Audit Committee Report 73
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 73
Ratification of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm 74
Incorporation by Reference 75
Shareholder Proposals for Next Annual Meeting 75
Delivery of Documents to Shareholders Sharing an
Address 75
Electronic Access to Annual Meeting Materials 76
Other Matters 76
Exhibit 1 – 2008 Long-Term
Incentive Plan 77

/TOC

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

SONOCO PRODUCTS COMPANY

1 NORTH SECOND STREET

HARTSVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA 29550 USA

NOTICE OF 2008 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

TIME 11:00 a.m. (Eastern time) on Wednesday, April 16, 2008
PLACE The Center Theater, 212 North Fifth Street, Hartsville, South
Carolina
PURPOSES (1) To elect five members of the Board of Directors;
(2) To act upon a proposal to approve the 2008 Long-Term
Incentive Plan;
(3) To ratify the selection of independent registered
public accounting firm; and
(4) To transact any other business that properly comes
before the meeting or any adjournment of the meeting.
RECORD DATE You may vote only if you were a shareholder of record at the
close of business on February 22, 2008.
ANNUAL REPORT We have enclosed a copy of the 2007 Annual Report or we
have delivered a single copy of the Annual Report for all
shareholders at your address. The Annual Report is not part of
the proxy soliciting material.
PROXY VOTING It is important that your shares be represented and voted at the
meeting.
If you hold your shares in your own name as a record
shareholder, please vote in one of these three ways:
(1) USE THE TOLL-FREE
TELEPHONE NUMBER shown on your proxy card if you live in the
United States or Canada;
(2) VISIT THE WEB SITE shown
on your proxy card and vote via the Internet; or
(3) MARK, SIGN, DATE AND
PROMPTLY RETURN the enclosed proxy card in the postage-paid
envelope.
If your shares are held in street name by a broker, bank or
other nominee, please follow the instructions it sent to you
with these proxy materials to have your shares voted at the
Annual Meeting.

By order of the Board of Directors,

Charles J. Hupfer Secretary

March 14, 2008

3

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

SONOCO PRODUCTS COMPANY

1 NORTH SECOND STREET HARTSVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA 29550 USA

PROXY STATEMENT

INFORMATION CONCERNING THE SOLICITATION

We are sending you these proxy materials in connection with the solicitation by the Board of Directors of Sonoco Products Company of proxies to be used at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders (“Annual Meeting”) to be held on Wednesday, April 16, 2008, at 11:00 a.m. (Eastern time) at The Center Theater, 212 North Fifth Street, Hartsville, S.C., and at any adjournment or postponement of the meeting. The terms “we,” “our,” “us,” “Sonoco” and “the Company” all refer to Sonoco Products Company. The proxy materials are first being mailed on or about March 14, 2008.

Who May Vote

You will only be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting if our records show that you were a record shareholder on February 22, 2008. At the close of business on February 22, 2008, a total of 99,486,369 shares of our common stock were outstanding and entitled to vote. Each share of common stock has one vote.

Voting

If your shares are held in street name by a broker, bank or other nominee, it will send you instructions that you must follow to have your shares voted at the Annual Meeting. If you hold your shares in your own name as a record shareholder, you may instruct the proxy agents how to vote your shares by completing, signing, dating and mailing the proxy card in the enclosed postage-paid envelope; by dialing the toll-free telephone number shown on your proxy card (if you live in the United States or Canada); or by accessing the Web site shown on your proxy card. Of course, if you are a record shareholder, you can always attend the meeting and vote your shares in person.

If you wish to attend the meeting in person, you may obtain directions to our office at our Web site: www.sonoco.com/sonoco/Home/About+Us/cor_directions.htm . The site of the annual meeting is only a short distance from the Sonoco office and directions from the office to the annual meeting site may be obtained at the reception desk.

The proxy agents will vote your shares as you instruct. If you are a record shareholder and you sign and return your proxy card without giving instructions, the proxy agents will vote your shares FOR each person named in this Proxy Statement as a nominee for election to the Board of Directors, FOR approval of the 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan, and FOR ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PWC”) as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008. The proxy agents will vote according to their best judgment on any other matter that properly comes before the Annual

5

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

Meeting. At present, the Board of Directors does not know of any other such matters. As discussed below under the caption “How Votes Will Be Counted”, if your shares are held in street name by a broker and you do not give the broker voting instructions pursuant to the directions the broker gives you, the broker will not be permitted to vote on the proposal to approve the 2008 Long Term Incentive Plan, though it will be permitted to vote on the other matters to be presented.

How to Revoke Your Proxy

You may revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted. If you hold your shares in your own name as a record shareholder, you may revoke your proxy in any of the following ways:

• by giving notice of revocation at the Annual Meeting;
• by delivering to the Secretary of the Company, 1 North Second
Street, Hartsville, SC 29550 USA, written instructions revoking
your proxy; or
• by delivering to the Secretary an executed proxy bearing a later
date.

Subsequent voting by telephone or via the Internet cancels your previous vote. If you are a shareholder of record, you may also attend the meeting and vote in person, in which case your proxy vote will not be used.

If your shares are held in street name by a broker, bank or other nominee, you may revoke your voting instructions by submitting new voting instructions to the broker or other nominee who holds your shares.

How Votes Will Be Counted

The Annual Meeting will be held if a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote (a “quorum”) is represented at the meeting. If you have submitted valid proxy instructions or are a record shareholder and attend the meeting in person, your shares will be counted for the purpose of determining whether there is a quorum, even if you wish to abstain from voting on some or all matters introduced. “Broker non-votes” also count in determining whether a quorum is present. A “broker non-vote” occurs when a broker, bank or nominee who holds shares for a beneficial owner attends the meeting in person or by proxy but does not vote on a particular proposal because the broker, bank or nominee does not have discretionary voting power for that proposal and has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner.

If your shares are held in street name by a broker, the broker is permitted to vote your shares on the election of directors and the ratification of PWC as our independent auditor even if the broker does not receive voting instructions from you. Under the New York Stock Exchange rules, your broker may not, however, vote your shares on the proposal relating to the 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan absent instructions from you. Without your voting instructions on this proposal, a broker non-vote will occur with respect to your shares.

If a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting, directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast by shares present and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. “Plurality” means that, if there were more nominees than positions to be filled, the persons who received the largest number of votes would be elected. Because there are the same number of nominees as positions to be filled, we expect all nominees to be elected. Votes that are withheld or that are not voted in the election of directors will have no effect on the outcome of the election. Cumulative voting is not permitted.

Approval of the proposal to adopt the 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the total votes cast on the proposal, provided that the total votes cast on the proposal represent

6

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

over 50% of all shares entitled to vote on the proposal. With respect to shares that are present and entitled to vote, any votes that are withheld or any shares that are not voted for adoption of the plan will have the effect of votes against the plan.

Any other matter, including ratification of the selection of PWC as our independent registered public accounting firm, that may be brought before the meeting will be approved if the votes cast in favor of the matter exceed the votes cast against the matter. Votes that are withheld or shares that are not voted will have no effect on the outcome of such matters.

Cost of this Proxy Solicitation

We will pay the cost of this proxy solicitation. In addition to soliciting proxies by mail, we expect that some of our officers and regular employees will solicit proxies by telephone, fax, email or personal contact. None of these officers or employees will receive any additional or special compensation for doing this. We also plan to engage W.F. Doring & Co., a proxy solicitation firm, to help identify street name shareholders and encourage their voting. Costs of the proxy solicitor will be approximately $5,000.

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The Board of Directors has fixed the number of directors of the Company at 13. At our Annual Meeting, five directors will be elected. Messrs. C.J. Bradshaw, J.L. Coker, M.D. Oken and General L.W. Newton have been nominated to hold office for the next three years, their terms expiring at the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting in 2011, or when their successors are duly elected and qualify to serve. Mr. P.R. Rollier has been nominated to hold office for the next two years, his term expiring at the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting in 2010, or when his successor is duly elected and qualifies to serve. General Newton was elected by the Board in February, 2008 and Mr. Rollier was elected by the Board in July, 2007. Neither General Newton nor Mr. Rollier has previously been elected by shareholders. General Newton was recommended for election to the Board by our Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. Rollier was recommended for election by a non-management director. The proxy agents intend to vote FOR the election of the five persons named above unless you withhold authority to vote for any or all of the nominees. The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR each nominee.

Name, Age, Principal Occupation for Last Five — Years and Directorships in Public Corporations Director Since
CHARLES J. BRADSHAW (71). Mr. Bradshaw has been
President and a director of Bradshaw Investments, Inc. (private
investments), Georgetown, S.C., since 1986. He was President and
Chief Operating Officer of Transworld Corporation from 1984 to
1986 and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Spartan Food
Systems, Inc. from 1961 to 1986. 1986

Although Mr. Bradshaw has been nominated for election to a three-year term, he will reach mandatory retirement age in July, 2008, and is only eligible to serve on the Board until that time.

7

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

Name, Age, Principal Occupation for Last Five — Years and Directorships in Public Corporations Director Since
JAMES L. COKER (67). Mr. Coker has been President of
JLC Enterprises (private investments), Stonington, Conn., since
1979. He was Secretary of the Company from 1969 to 1995 and was
President of Sonoco Limited, Canada, from 1972 to 1979. 1969
LLOYD W. NEWTON (65). General Newton was Executive Vice
President of the Pratt & Whitney Military Engines
business unit (manufacturer of engines for military aircraft),
E. Hartford, Conn. (a part of United Technologies Corporation),
from 2000 until his retirement in 2006. After a distinguished 34-year military career, General Newton had earlier retired as a
four-star general of the U.S. Air Force in 2000. At the time of
his retirement from the Air Force, General Newton was Commander,
Air Education and Training Command – a 13-base,
57,000 personnel assignment. He is a director of Goodrich
Corporation and Torchmark Corporation. 2008
MARC D. OKEN (61). Mr. Oken has been Managing
Partner of Falfurrias Capital Partners (a private equity firm),
Charlotte, N.C., since January 2006. He held executive officer
positions (most recently as Chief Financial Officer) at Bank of
America Corporation from 1989 until he retired in January 2006.
Prior to joining Bank of America, he was a partner at Price
Waterhouse LLP, serving there for 13 years. From 1981 to
1983 Mr. Oken was a Fellow with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. He is a director of Marsh & McLennan
Companies, Inc. and Star Scientific, Inc. 2006
PHILIPPE R. ROLLIER (65). Mr. Rollier retired as
president and chief executive officer of Lafarge North America
(construction materials group), Herndon, Va., in December, 2006,
having served in that position from 2001 to 2006. He spent his
entire career with Lafarge Group progressing through numerous
positions before assuming the responsibilities mentioned above.
He is a director of Moria, S.A., Sperian Protection, Carbone
Lorraine, and Monier S.A. 2007

8

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

INFORMATION CONCERNING DIRECTORS WHOSE TERMS CONTINUE

Members of the Board of Directors whose terms of office will continue until our Annual Shareholders’ Meeting in 2009 are:

Name, Age, Principal Occupation for Last Five — Years and Directorships in Public Corporations Director Since
DR. PAMELA L. DAVIES (51). Dr. Davies has been
President of Queens University of Charlotte (institution of
higher learning), Charlotte, N.C., since 2002. Prior to that she
was Dean of the McColl School of Business at Queens University
of Charlotte from 2000 to 2002. Dr. Davies was Professor of
Management and Dean of the LeBow College of Business at Drexel
University from 1997 to 2000. She is a director of Charming
Shoppes and C&D Technologies, Inc. 2004
HARRIS E. DeLOACH, JR. (63). Mr. DeLoach has been
Chairman since 2005 and President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company since 2000. He was Chief Operating Officer of the
Company from April 2000 to July 2000, Senior Executive Vice
President from 1999 to 2000, Executive Vice President from 1996
to 1999, Group Vice President from 1993 to 1996, Vice
President – Film, Plastics and Special Products
from February 1993 to October 1993, Vice
President – High Density Film Products division
from 1990 to 1993 and Vice
President – Administration and General Counsel
from 1986 to 1990. Mr. DeLoach is a director of Goodrich
Corporation and Progress Energy, Inc. 1998
EDGAR H. LAWTON, III (47). Mr. Lawton has been
President and Treasurer of Hartsville Oil Mill (vegetable oil
processor), Darlington, S.C., since 2000, and he has been a
director of Hartsville Oil Mill since 1991. Mr. Lawton was
Vice President of Hartsville Oil Mill from 1991 to 2000. 2001

9

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

Name, Age, Principal Occupation for Last Five — Years and Directorships in Public Corporations Director Since
JOHN E. LINVILLE (62). Mr. Linville has been an
attorney in private practice in New York, N.Y., since November
2004. Prior to that he had been Counsel with Manatt,
Phelps & Phillips, LLP from January 2003 to 2004. He
joined the firm through its merger with his prior
firm – Kalkines, Arky, Zall & Bernstein, LLP
(“KAZB”). Mr. Linville joined KAZB in 1990 after
having been General Counsel and then Acting President of the New
York City Health & Hospitals Corporation. 2004
JAMES M. MICALI (60). Mr. Micali has been Chairman
and President of Michelin North America, Inc. (tire
manufacturer), Greenville, S.C., since 1996. In 2001, he became
a member of Michelin Group’s Executive Council.
Mr. Micali was Executive Vice President, Legal and Finance,
of Michelin North America from 1990 to 1996, and prior to that
was General Counsel and Secretary from 1985 to 1990.
Mr. Micali is a director of SCANA Corporation. 2003

Members of the Board of Directors whose terms of office will continue until our Annual Shareholders’ Meeting in 2010 are:

Name, Age, Principal Occupation for Last Five — Years and Directorships in Public Corporations Director Since
CALEB C. FORT (46). Mr. Fort has been
Co-Chairman of The Merit Group, Inc. (distributors of
residential and commercial paint-related products and various
industrial supplies), Spartanburg, S.C., since 1998. He was a
principal of Lancaster Distributing Company from 1990 to 1998.
Mr. Fort is a director of Carolina Alliance Bank. 2001

10

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

Name, Age, Principal Occupation for Last Five — Years and Directorships in Public Corporations Director Since
JOHN H. MULLIN, III (66). Mr. Mullin has been
Chairman of Ridgeway Farm LLC (privately held timber and farming
business), Brookneal, Va., since 1989. He was associated with
Dillon, Read & Co. Inc. from 1969 to 1989, last
serving as Managing Director. Mr. Mullin is a director of
Progress Energy, Inc. and its subsidiary companies, Progress
Energy Carolinas, Inc. and Florida Progress Corporation, and of
Hess Corporation. 2002
THOMAS E. WHIDDON (55). After his retirement from
Lowe’s Companies, Inc. in 2003, Mr. Whiddon has been
an Advisory Director of Berkshire Partners, LLC (a Boston-based
private equity firm) since October 2005 and in this role has
served various Berkshire portfolio companies in an executive
capacity on an interim basis. He was Executive Vice
President – Logistics and Technology of Lowe’s
from 2000 until he retired in 2003 and was Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Lowe’s from 1996
to 2000. Mr. Whiddon is a director of Carter’s Inc.
and Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. 2001

11

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Director Independence Policies

Our listing agreement with the New York Stock Exchange requires that at least a majority of the members of our Board of Directors be independent. Under the Exchange’s standards, “independent” means that a director has been determined by the Board to have no material relationship with us (either directly, or indirectly through an immediate family member or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with us). To assist us in making these determinations we have adopted the following guidelines, which are also the guidelines set forth in the New York Stock Exchange Listing Standards.

A director will not be considered independent if:

| • | The director is, or in the past three years has been, our
employee, or has an immediate family member who is, or in the
past three years has been, one of our executive officers; |
| --- | --- |
| • | The director has received, or has an immediate family member
(other than an immediate family member who is a non-executive
employee) who has received, during any twelve-month period
within the past three years, more than $100,000 in direct
compensation from us (other than director fees and pension or
other forms of deferred compensation for prior service that is
not contingent in any way on continued service); |
| • | The director or an immediate family member is a current partner
of a firm that is our internal or external auditor or the
director is a current employee of such a firm; |
| • | The director has an immediate family member who is a current
employee of a firm that is our internal or external auditor and
who participates in the firm’s audit, assurance or tax
compliance (but not tax planning) practice; |
| • | The director or an immediate family member was within the last
three years (but is no longer) a partner or employee of our
internal or external audit firm and personally worked on our
audit within that time; |
| • | The director or an immediate family member is, or in the past
three years has been, an executive officer of another company
where any of our present executives at the same time serves or
served on that company’s compensation committee; or |
| • | The director is a current employee of, or has an immediate
family member who is a current executive officer of, another
company that has made payments to, or received payments from, us
for property or services in an amount which, in any of the last
three fiscal years, exceeds the greater of $1 million or 2%
of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues. |

The following relationships will not be considered to be material relationships that would impair a director’s independence:

• Being a current employee of, or having an immediate family member who is a current executive officer of, another company that has made payments to, or received payments from, us for property or services

12

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

in an amount which, in any of the last three fiscal years, is less than the greater of $1 million or 2% of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues.

Based on these criteria, our Board of Directors has determined that the following directors, who constitute a majority of the Board, are independent:

C.J. Bradshaw, J.L. Coker, P.L. Davies, C.C. Fort, E.H. Lawton, III, J.E. Linville, J.M. Micali, J.H. Mullin, III, L.W. Newton, M.D. Oken, P.R. Rollier and T.E. Whiddon.

Meetings of Non-Management Directors

Our non-management directors meet at regularly scheduled executive sessions without management present. Four such meetings were held during 2007; there was also one meeting of the independent directors. The presiding director for each meeting is elected by those directors in attendance at that meeting. Shareholders and other interested parties may communicate with the non-management (or independent) directors by writing to Non-Management (or Independent) Directors, c/o Corporate Secretary, Sonoco Products Company, 1 North Second Street, Hartsville, SC 29550 USA or by email to [email protected].

Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

We have adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines and a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for our directors, officers and employees. Copies of these governance guidelines and the Code of Business Conduct are available through our Web site at www.sonoco.com. Printed versions are available to our shareholders on request to the Corporate Secretary, Sonoco Products Company, 1 North Second Street, Hartsville, SC 29550 USA or through email to [email protected].

Director Nomination Process

Our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee recommends to our Board of Directors nominees to fill vacancies on the Board of Directors as they occur, and recommends candidates for election as directors at Annual Meetings of Shareholders. Such candidates are routinely identified through personal and business relationships and contacts of the directors and executive officers.

In recommending candidates, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee evaluates such factors as it deems appropriate based on our current needs. These factors may include diversity, age, skills such as understanding of appropriate technologies and general finance, decision-making ability, interpersonal skills, experience with businesses and other organizations of comparable size, and the inter-relationship between the candidate’s experience and business background and other Board members’ experience and business background. Additionally, candidates for director should possess the highest personal and professional ethics, and they should be committed to the long-term interests of the shareholders.

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will consider director candidates recommended by shareholders, if the shareholders comply with the following requirements. If you wish to recommend a director candidate to the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee for consideration as a Board of Directors’ nominee, you must submit in writing to the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee your

13

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

recommended candidate’s name, a brief resume setting forth the recommended candidate’s business and educational background and qualifications for service, and a notarized consent signed by the recommended candidate stating the recommended candidate’s willingness to be nominated and to serve. This information must be delivered to the Chair of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee at the Company’s address and must be received no later than January 5 in any year to be considered by the Committee as a potential Board of Directors’ nominee. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee may request further information if it determines a potential candidate may be an appropriate nominee. Director candidates recommended by shareholders that comply with these requirements will receive the same consideration that the Committee’s other candidates receive.

Director candidates recommended by shareholders will not be considered by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee for election at an annual meeting unless the shareholder recommendations are received no later than January 5 of the year of the meeting. In addition to making such recommendations, shareholders have the right to nominate candidates for election as directors at an annual meeting if they make a written nomination at least 60 days prior to the meeting. Any such nomination should be submitted to our Corporate Secretary at 1 North Second Street, Hartsville, SC 29550 USA. No such nominations have been made for this Annual Meeting.

Communications with the Board of Directors

Any shareholder or other interested person who wishes to send communications to any member of the Board of Directors should mail such communications addressed to the intended recipient by name or position in care of: Corporate Secretary, Sonoco Products Company, 1 North Second Street, Hartsville, SC 29550 USA or by email to [email protected]. Upon receipt of any such communications, the Corporate Secretary will determine the identity of the intended recipient and whether the communication is an appropriate shareholder communication. The Corporate Secretary will send all appropriate shareholder communications to the intended recipient. An “appropriate shareholder communication” is a communication from a person claiming to be a shareholder in the communication the subject of which relates solely to the sender’s interest as a shareholder and not to any other personal or business interest.

In the case of communications addressed to the Board of Directors, the Corporate Secretary will send appropriate shareholder communications to the Chair of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. In the case of communications addressed to the independent or non-management directors, the Corporate Secretary will send appropriate shareholder communications to the Chair of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. In the case of communications addressed to committees of the Board, the Corporate Secretary will send appropriate shareholder communications to the Chair of such committee.

The Corporate Secretary is required to maintain a record of all communications received that were addressed to one or more directors, including those determined not to be appropriate shareholder communications. Such record will include the name of the addressee, the disposition by the Corporate Secretary and, in the case of communications determined not to be appropriate, a brief description of the nature of the communication. The Corporate Secretary is required to provide a copy of any additions to the record to the Chair of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee quarterly.

14

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

Board Meetings and Committees of the Board

During 2007, our Board of Directors held four regularly scheduled meetings and four special meetings to review significant developments affecting us and to act on matters requiring the Board of Directors’ approval. During 2007, all directors attended 75% or more of the aggregate number of meetings of the Board of Directors and committees of which they were members.

We encourage, but do not require, our directors to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. In 2007, all twelve directors attended the Annual Meeting.

To assist it in performing its duties, the Board of Directors has established the six committees discussed below. All committees operate pursuant to written charters. The charters are available to shareholders through the Investor Relations page of our Web site at www.sonoco.com. These charters are also available in print to any shareholder upon request to the Corporate Secretary, Sonoco Products Company, 1 North Second Street, Hartsville, SC 29550 USA or through email to [email protected]. The Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Audit, Corporate Governance and Nominating, and Executive Compensation committees is independent, as defined in the New York Stock Exchange’s listing standards.

Committee Number of — 2007
Name Purpose Members Meetings
Audit Committee (established in accordance with
Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) • At least annually, appoint or replace the
independent registered public accounting firm and oversee the
work of such independent registered public accounting firm who
shall report directly to the committee; M.D. Oken – Chair P.L. Davies C.C. Fort J.E. Linville J.M. Micali L.W. Newton* P.R. Rollier 8
• Pre-approve all auditing services and
permitted non-audit services to be
performed by the independent
registered
public accounting firm; * Until March 1, 2008 ** As of March 1, 2008
• Evaluate the qualifications, independence
and performance of the independent registered public accounting
firm;
• Review and concur in the appointment,
reassignment or dismissal of the director of internal audit, and
review the internal audit department annual budget, staffing and
audit plan;
• Review compliance with major accounting and
financial policies of the Company;

15

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

Committee Number of — 2007
Name Purpose Members Meetings
• Review management’s assessment of the
adequacy of internal controls;
• Review significant findings of the
independent registered public accounting firm and the internal
audit department together with management’s responses;
• Review with the independent registered
public accounting firm any problems or difficulties together
with management’s responses. Consider any reports or
communications to the Committee from the independent registered
public accounting firm;
• Review the results of the annual external
audit with the independent registered public accounting firm;
• Discuss the annual and quarterly financial
statements and all disclosures thereto with the independent
registered public accounting firm, management and the director
of internal audit, including major issues regarding accounting
principles, analyses of alternative GAAP treatments, the effect
of regulatory and accounting initiatives, and the type and
presentation of information to be included in earnings press
releases;
• Discuss CEO and CFO certifications regarding
filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission;
• Discuss guidelines and policies by which
management assesses and manages the Company’s exposure to
risk. Evaluate the steps management has taken to monitor and
control such exposures;

16

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

Committee Number of — 2007
Name Purpose Members Meetings
• Recommend to the Board of Directors whether
to accept the audited financial statements;
• Establish procedures for (1) receipt
and treatment of complaints about accounting, internal controls
or auditing matters; and (2) the confidential, anonymous
submission by employees of concerns regarding questionable
accounting matters; and
• Review monitoring of compliance with the
Company’s Code of Business Conduct.

17

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

Committee Number of — 2007
Name Purpose Members Meetings
Executive Compensation Committee • Establish the Company’s general
compensation philosophy and oversee the development and
implementation of compensation programs; • Review and approve corporate goals and
objectives relevant to the compensation of the CEO, evaluate the
performance of the CEO in light of those goals and establish the
CEO’s compensation based on this evaluation and other
factors; J.H. Mullin, III – Chair C.J. Bradshaw P.L. Davies* C.C. Fort J.M. Micali M.D. Oken * As of March 1, 2008 6
• Review and approve the executive officer
compensation programs;
• Evaluate and administer the Company’s
incentive plans;
• Working with management, oversee regulatory
compliance on compensation
matters; and
• Review management development and succession
plans.

The Executive Compensation Committee oversees administration of our executive officer compensation programs and sets compensation for the CEO, CFO and other executive officers. Its specific functions are described above.

Executive Compensation Committee Processes and Procedures

The Executive Compensation Committee does not delegate its decision-making authority relating to executive compensation. Except for the CEO, the role of executive officers in determining executive compensation is primarily advisory in nature, especially with regard to the structure and composition of the compensation program. Each executive officer may make recommendations with regard to the size of awards for persons who report directly to him or her, but the CEO makes the final decision as to what is submitted to the Committee for their consideration. The CEO attends Committee meetings, but is not present when his own compensation is discussed. The Committee has sole responsibility for determining the compensation for the CEO and for approving all other executive compensation.

The Committee has sole authority to hire and dismiss a compensation consultant to act as its advisor. Information about the Committee’s compensation consultant, its role in advising the Committee, and its relationship with management and executive officers is set forth under the captions “Management Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Relationship with Executive Compensation Consultant” and “Role of Executive Officers in Determining Executive Compensation” on Page 37.

18

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

Committee Number of — 2007
Name Purpose Members Meetings
Corporate Governance And Nominating Committee • Recommend to the Board of Directors
amendments to the bylaws; • Develop
and recommend to the Board of Directors a set of corporate
governance guidelines addressing the structure, mission,
practices and policies of the Board of Directors and the
composition, structure and mission of Board committees, and
review those guidelines at least annually; J.M. Micali – Chair C.J. Bradshaw C.C. Fort J.H. Mullin, III M.D. Oken* T.E. Whiddon * As of March 1, 2008 4
• Identify individuals believed to be
qualified to become Board members and recommend them as needed
for election by the Board of Directors or the shareholders to
fill vacancies;
• Review with the Board of Directors, on an
annual basis, the skills and characteristics of the then-
current Board members;
• Recommend to the Board of Directors the
directors to serve on each of the Board’s committees;
• Ensure that processes are in place for
annual CEO performance and compensation appraisal and for
reviews of succession planning and management development;
• Recommend to the Board of Directors a
corporate philosophy and strategy governing director
compensation and benefits;
• Evaluate all material related party
transactions between the Company and its executive officers and
directors in accordance with the Company’s Related Party
Transaction Approval Policy; and
• Oversee the evaluation of the Board of
Directors and of management.

19

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

Committee Number of — 2007
Name Purpose Members Meetings
Employee and Public Responsibility Committee • Oversee the Company’s commitment to
employee health and safety; • Provide oversight on diversity strategy,
goals and progress; • Review charitable giving policies and
practices; • Review employee morale through survey results
or other means; • Oversee the Company’s stance, response
and programs related to the environment and to other emerging
issues; • Monitor major litigation and disputes and
provide guidance in responding to such issues; • Review actions taken by management relating
to current or emerging public policy issues or significant
political and social changes that may affect the
Company; and • Oversee the Company’s commitment to
ethical business practices. J.E. Linville – Chair J.L. Coker P.L. Davies E.H. Lawton, III L.W. Newton* P.R. Rollier * As of March 1, 2008 2

20

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

Committee Number of — 2007
Name Purpose Members Meetings
Financial Policy Committee • Review the Company’s annual operating
and long- range plans for purposes of evaluating changes to the
Company’s capital structure and projected sources and uses
of cash; • Review as needed any significant financings
by the Company; • Review the Company’s financial risk
management policies, practices and exposures; • Evaluate the Company’s dividend
policy; • Review the funding and investment management
of the Company’s defined benefit and postretirement benefit
plans; and • Review the Company’s key financial
leverage ratios and ratings implications. T.E. Whiddon – Chair C.J. Bradshaw J.L. Coker P.L. Davies E.H. Lawton, III J.H. Mullin, III 3
Executive Committee • Empowered to exercise all of the authority
of the Board of Directors between regularly scheduled meetings,
except as limited by South Carolina law. H.E. DeLoach, Jr. J.M Micali J.H. Mullin, III 1

21

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

Members of the Executive Compensation Committee during the year ended December 31, 2007 were C.J. Bradshaw, C.C. Fort, B.L.M. Kasriel, J.E. Linville, J.M. Micali, J.H. Mullin, III, and M.D. Oken.

Mr. Oken was Chief Financial Officer of Bank of America until he retired in January 2006. During the second quarter of 2007, a Bank of America subsidiary managed the syndication and participated as agent in the expansion of a five-year committed revolving line of credit from $350,000,000 to $500,000,000 to support our commercial paper program and for general corporate purposes. Bank of America’s commitment to this facility is $57,857,000. A committed line of credit from Bank of America has been in place since 1987 and has been renewed, amended and increased or decreased according to our needs. Bank of America has extended other lines of credit to us as support for letters of credit, overdrafts and other corporate needs. It also provides treasury management services to us. We pay fees to the bank for these services and for the availability of the lines of credit, as well as interest on any borrowed funds.

Sonoco sold $901,000 in products and services to Michelin North America during 2007. Mr. Micali, the Chairman and President of Michelin North America, is one of Sonoco’s directors. In addition, the brother of our Director P.R. Rollier is the Managing General Partner of Michelin Group, the owner of Michelin North America.

All transactions were handled on a competitive basis. Management believes that the rates and provisions were as favorable to us as we could have obtained from other sources.

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Please see the disclosures about Messrs. Micali, Oken and Rollier under the caption “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation”. Our management believes the prices and terms of the transactions reported above were comparable to those we could have obtained from other sources. We anticipate engaging in similar business transactions in 2008. The Board of Directors considered these relationships when making its determinations of independence.

George S. Hartley, our Assistant Treasurer, is married to Cynthia A. Hartley who is a Senior Vice President. Mr. Hartley had 2007 earnings of $162,000, and he received the usual employee benefits available to all employees at his level.

We are currently proposing to enter into an agreement with Mr. Charles W. Coker, our retired Chairman and President, regarding a modification of his existing Company provided split-dollar life insurance benefit plan (the “Split-Dollar Plan”). Mr. Coker is the brother of Mr. F. L. H. Coker, who was our director until October 2007. Under the proposal, the life insurance policies in the existing Split-Dollar Plan will be exchanged for a new survivorship policy. The death benefits that are provided for Mr. Coker under the Split-Dollar Plan will be reduced and the future scheduled premiums we are obligated to pay will be eliminated. In return, we will pay Mr. Coker the amount required each year to cover the taxes on the income imputed to him for the new survivorship policy. In 2008, we expect that the amount will be approximately $4,000, based on the current proposal and the insurance company’s annual renewable term rates. We expect that future payments we make to Mr. Coker will increase each year as long as the insurance is in force, based on the applicable

22

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

imputed income rates. We do not expect the total amount of the future tax payments we make related to the new survivorship policy to exceed the total amount of the scheduled future premiums we are presently obligated to pay under the existing Split-Dollar Plan.

Related Party Transaction Approval Policy

The Board has adopted a written policy that any transaction or series of transactions in which Sonoco is a participant, for which the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and in which any related person will have a direct or indirect material interest must be approved by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. The Board recognizes that such transactions may or may not be in the best interest of Sonoco and, as a result, empowers the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee to evaluate all such related party transactions or series of transactions. The Committee is to approve only those transactions that it determines provide net economic value to Sonoco or where it is demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Committee that price, quality, service and other terms have been negotiated on an arms-length basis and are comparable to those available from unrelated third parties.

Sonoco’s officers are required to notify the Committee of the proposed and ongoing related party transactions prior to each meeting of the Committee and provide the Committee with all relevant information necessary for the Committee’s consideration, including any information requested by the Committee.

For purposes of this policy, a “related party is (1) any executive officer or director, (2) any nominee for director, (3) a beneficial owner of more than 5% of the voting securities of Sonoco, or (4) any immediate family member of an officer, director, nominee for director or greater than 5% beneficial owner. An “immediate family member” means any child, stepchild, parent, stepparent, spouse, sibling, mother-in-law, father-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, or any person (other than a tenant or employee) sharing the household of an executive officer, director, nominee or greater than 5% beneficial owner.

We also require that each executive officer, director and director nominee complete an annual questionnaire and report all transactions with us in which such persons (or their immediate family members) had or will have a direct or indirect material interest (except for salaries, directors’ fees and dividends on our stock). Management reviews responses to the questionnaires and, if any such transactions are disclosed, they are reviewed by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee as to directors and director nominees or by the Audit Committee as to executive officers. Directors’ responses to the questionnaires are also reviewed annually by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee for the purpose of assessing independence under our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the New York Stock Exchange Listing Standards.

The types of transactions that have been reviewed in the past include the purchase and sale of goods and services from companies for which our directors serve as executive officers or directors, the purchase of financial services and access to lines of credit from banks for which our directors serve as executive officers or directors, and the employment of family members of executive officers or directors.

23

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT

The following table shows the number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned as of February 13, 2008, directly or indirectly, by each director and by each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table.

Amount and — Nature of Percent Restricted Compensation Contingent
Beneficial Of Stock and Restoration Restricted
Name of Beneficial Owner Ownership(1) Class(2) Units(3) Units(4) Stock Units(5)
C.J. Bradshaw 54,478 (6) – – 8,348 –
Director
J.L. Coker 126,400 (7) – – 3,182 –
Director
P.L. Davies 7,000 – – 3,182 –
Director
C.C. Fort 324,852 (8) – – 3,182 –
Director
E.H. Lawton, III 382,067 (9) – – 3,182 –
Director
J.E. Linville 753,213 – – 3,182 –
Director
J.M. Micali 15,339 – – 4,570 –
Director
J.H. Mullin, III 30,000 (10) – – 6,557 –
Director
L.W. Newton – – – – –
Director
M.D. Oken 5,350 – – 3,128 –
Director
P.R. Rollier 4,000 – – – –
Director
T.E. Whiddon 25,000 – – 3,182 –
Director
H.E. DeLoach, Jr. 1,087,976 (11) 1.1 % 247,620 27,182 154,956
Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
C.J. Hupfer 215,778 – 7,988 5,484 41,638
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
C.L. Sullivan, Jr. 253,739 – 12,631 10,961 25,094
Executive Vice President
M.J. Sanders 86,431 – 8,338 3,521 10,531
Executive Vice President

24

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

Amount and — Nature of Percent Restricted Deferred — Compensation Performance- — Contingent
Beneficial Of Stock and Restoration Restricted
Name of Beneficial Owner Ownership(1) Class(2) Units(3) Units(4) Stock Units(5)
J.C. Bowen 147,007 – 15,254 6,483 29,778
Senior Vice President
All Executive Officers and Directors 4,190,274 4.2 % 351,230 136,783 349,585
as a group (27 persons)

callerid=999 iwidth=455 length=60

| (1) | The directors and named executive officers have sole voting and
dispositive power over the shares unless otherwise indicated in
the footnotes. The number includes shares subject to currently
exercisable options and options exercisable within 60 days
granted under the 1991 Key Employee Stock Plan (the “1991
Plan”) and the Directors’ Plan for the following
directors and named executive officers: C.J.
Bradshaw – 27,200; J.L. Coker – 22,200; P.L.
Davies – 7,000; C.C. Fort – 18,500; E.H.
Lawton, III – 36,839; J.E. Linville –
6,000; J.M. Micali – 11,000; J.H.
Mullin, III – 15,000; T.E. Whiddon –
20,000; H.E. DeLoach, Jr. – 803,000; C.J.
Hupfer – 212,000; C.L. Sullivan, Jr. –
240,000; M.J. Sanders – 77,500; J.C. Bowen –
141,600; and for all executive officers and directors as a
group – 2,245,354. |
| --- | --- |
| | Also included are shares held in our Dividend Reinvestment Plan
(425) and shares held in our Savings Plan (31,567). |
| | Shareholdings in this column do not include Restricted Stock
Units granted under the 1991 Key Employee Stock Plan (issuance
of which has been deferred until retirement), compensation which
has been deferred into Sonoco stock equivalent units,
Performance Contingent Restricted Stock Units granted under the
1991 Key Employee Stock Plan or Restoration Units credited under
the Omnibus Benefit Restoration Plan. Please see the columns to
the right and footnotes 3, 4 and 5 below. |
| (2) | Percentages not shown are less than 1%. |
| (3) | Issuance of these shares, most of which have vested, has been
deferred until retirement; accordingly, no present dispositive
or voting rights are associated with them. |
| (4) | Compensation deferred into Sonoco stock equivalent units and
Restoration Units in the Omnibus Benefit Restoration Plan
connected with the Sonoco Savings Plan. No dispositive or voting
rights are associated with these units. Restoration Units under
the Omnibus Benefit Restoration Plan are granted to employees
who have reached the Internal Revenue Code limits under the
Sonoco Savings Plan to restore the Company match that would
otherwise be lost because of this cap. |
| (5) | Performance-Contingent Restricted Stock Unit payouts which
vested under the Long-term Incentive Plan for the performance
periods ended December 31, 2005, December 31, 2006 and
December 31, 2007. Issuance of these shares has been
deferred until retirement and no present dispositive or voting
rights are associated with them. |
| (6) | Includes 4,840 shares of common stock owned by
Mrs. Bradshaw, as to which Mr. Bradshaw disclaims
beneficial ownership. |
| (7) | Includes 70,000 shares pledged as security. |
| (8) | Includes 77,358 shares pledged as security. |

25

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

| (9) | Includes 281,658 shares owned by an educational trust of
which Mr. Lawton is a trustee. Mr. Lawton shares
voting and investment power over these shares with six other
trustees, but he has no pecuniary interest in this trust and
disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares. |
| --- | --- |
| (10) | Includes 15,000 shares pledged as security. |
| (11) | Includes 12,365 shares of common stock owned by
Mrs. DeLoach, as to which Mr. DeLoach disclaims
beneficial ownership. Also includes 223,338 shares owned by
trusts of which Mr. DeLoach is trustee. Mr. DeLoach
shares voting and investment power over these trusts with other
trustees, but he has no pecuniary interest in these trusts and
disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares. |

On April 15, 2003, the Board of Directors adopted a resolution establishing stock ownership guidelines for outside directors. The guidelines establish a target level of ownership of our common stock based on years of service as a director from the date the guidelines were established. The guidelines are as follows: 3,000 shares, 5,000 shares and 8,000 shares after two, four and six years of service, respectively. Compensation deferred into Sonoco stock equivalent units are included in determining whether these guidelines have been met.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS

The following table shows information as of December 31, 2007, about persons known to us to be the beneficial owners of more than 5% of our common shares. This information was obtained from a Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by the entity named below, and we have not independently verified it.

Amount and
Nature of
Beneficial Percent
Title of Class Name and Address of Beneficial Owner Ownership of Class
No Par Value Common Barclay’s Global Investors, Ltd.(1) 12,429,729 12.50 %
Murray House 1 Royal Mint Court London, England, United Kingdom

callerid=999 iwidth=455 length=60

(1) Barclay’s Global Investors is a parent holding company that has subsidiaries which act as investment advisors to manage discretionary investment accounts on behalf of their clients. The subsidiaries have sole dispositive power with respect to all of the shares reported and sole voting power with respect to 10,886,798 of the shares reported.

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Our directors and executive officers are required to file reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the New York Stock Exchange showing the number of shares of any class of our equity securities they owned when they became a director or executive officer, and, after that, any changes in their ownership of our securities. These reports are required by Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Based on a review of Section 16(a) reports and any written representations made to us, we believe that all such filings for 2007 were made in a timely manner.

26

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

MANAGEMENT COMPENSATION

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The first part of this discussion provides an overview of the compensation program for our executive officers, the material principles underlying our compensation policies and decisions and a description of each compensation element, how these elements fit together and how they further our goals.

The second part of the discussion describes and explains the specific actions taken with regard to compensation for executive officers in 2007. This discussion and analysis and the tables that follow focus on all aspects of compensation for our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) and the three other most highly compensated officers. These five individuals are referred to as the Named Executive Officers (“NEOs”).

OVERVIEW, PRINCIPLES AND COMPENSATION ELEMENTS

The Role of the Executive Compensation Committee

The Executive Compensation Committee oversees administration of our executive officer compensation programs and sets compensation for the CEO, CFO and other executive officers. Information about the purposes of the Committee and its processes and procedures for consideration and determination of executive officer and director compensation is outlined under the caption “Board Meetings and Committees of the Board — Executive Compensation Committee” on page 18 of this Proxy Statement. The Executive Compensation Committee does not delegate its decision-making authority relating to executive compensation.

Overall Compensation Objectives

The primary objectives of our executive compensation program are as follows:

1. To attract and retain high quality management talent;
2. To encourage the achievement of key financial and strategic
goals by forging a strong linkage between company performance
and compensation;
3. To enhance a commonality of interest between management and
shareholders; and
4. To enhance the financial efficiency of the program to us and our
shareholders with regard to the accounting treatment,
deductibility, and taxation of compensation, taking into
consideration the regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (“SEC”) and the Internal Revenue Service
(“IRS”) and guidance of the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (“FASB”).

Each aspect of the overall program is designed to support these objectives to various degrees with the overarching goal of maximizing shareholder value.

As discussed below, the executive compensation program has three components:

  1. Direct compensation elements, consisting of base salary, annual cash incentive awards, and long-term incentive awards;

27

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

| 2. | Executive benefit elements, consisting of executive life
insurance and a supplemental executive retirement
benefit; and |
| --- | --- |
| 3. | Nominal perquisites. |

Direct Compensation Elements

The direct compensation elements of the executive compensation program consist of base salary, annual cash incentive compensation, and long-term incentive compensation comprised of stock-settled stock appreciation rights (“SSARs”) and performance contingent restricted stock units (“PCSUs”). With the exception of base salary, all elements of executive compensation are variable and are contingent on achieving performance targets based on one or more of the following key company performance indicators: growth in base earnings per share, growth in revenue, improvement in return on net assets employed, or reduction in working capital.

In constructing the direct compensation package for the NEOs and the other executive officers, the Committee adheres to the following principles:

| 1. | The majority of direct compensation should be at risk in order
to align direct compensation paid with overall company results.
Therefore, the potential variable pay component is greater than
base salary. |
| --- | --- |
| 2. | For the CEO, equity compensation should be weighted more than
total cash compensation to provide stronger alignment with
shareholder interests. |
| 3. | Long-term incentives should be weighted more than short-term
incentives to reflect the importance of making strategic
decisions that focus on long-term results. |

28

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

The charts below show the use of these three principles in the weightings the Committee has assigned to the 2007 direct compensation components at target. For annual cash incentives, “target” is equal to budget performance. For long-term incentives, “target” is equal to the grant date value of the shares calculated pursuant to Financial Accounting Standard 123R (FAS 123R). Stock-settled stock appreciation rights vest in one year. Performance contingent restricted stock units will vest in three years assuming performance results are achieved as explained in more detail on pages 31-32.

Total Direct Compensation at Target — ●
All Officers Except NEOs All NEOs Except CEO CEO
Cash Versus Equity at Target
All Officers Except NEOs All NEOs Except CEO CEO
Long-Term Versus Short-Term
Incentive at Target
All Officers Except NEOs All NEOs Except CEO CEO

29

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

Determining Competitive Benchmarks — Total Direct Compensation

Our salary ranges and incentive compensation for all salaried positions, including the CEO, CFO and other executive officers, are based on the combination of (1) a structured job evaluation system to provide for internal pay equity, and (2) a market pricing system that matches individual jobs to independent salary surveys to provide for external competitiveness.

In order to determine competitive compensation levels, we annually participate in three national surveys conducted by the independent consulting firms of the Hay Group (over 600 participants), Hewitt Associates (over 700 participants) and Towers Perrin (over 250 participants). Collectively these surveys have over 1,000 participating companies, although some companies like us participate in more than one survey. These surveys cover a large number of similar corporate officer positions across United States industry. In most cases, we match our corporate officer positions to survey data from companies with sales in the $1 billion to $5 billion range. Likewise, we match division officer positions to similar positions in the survey data for comparable division revenue ranges. From these surveys, we develop executive compensation levels for base salaries, total cash compensation (base salary plus annual target incentive compensation), and total direct compensation (total cash compensation plus long-term incentives). In addition to these broad surveys, periodically the Committee’s consultant prepares customized compensation studies with respect to our NEOs in comparison to the NEOs of the fourteen peer packaging companies which have median sales, assets and market capitalization similar to that of Sonoco.

The fourteen peer packaging companies were:

Aptar Group Incorporated Avery Dennison Corporation Ball Corporation Bemis Company Incorporated Caraustar Industries Chesapeake Corporation Crown Holdings Incorporated

Owens-Illinois Incorporated Pactiv Corporation Rock-Tenn Company Sealed Air Corporation Silgan Holdings Smurfit-Stone Container Temple-Inland Incorporated

The Committee uses information from the broader industry data to set specific compensation levels, but routinely cross checks these levels against the more specific peer company data. In most cases the data from both sources are very comparable.

The Committee sets the market rate or competitive benchmark for base salary for each position at the median (50th percentile) of the survey data. This means that on average half of the surveyed companies are likely to pay a higher base salary than we pay for a similar executive position and half will pay less. The Committee believes that targeting base pay at the median of the market is appropriate because base pay is fixed and does not vary each year based on company performance.

The Committee then sets and maintains individual base salaries at no less than 80% or more than 120% of the market median based on the overall level of each officer’s management expertise, experience, time in position and performance.

30

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

For annual cash incentives and total direct compensation (total cash compensation plus long-term incentives), the Committee sets competitive benchmarks between the median and the 75th percentile of the survey data. The committee believes that if the executives meet challenging goals, they should have the opportunity to earn compensation above the market median. Likewise, if the executives do not fully meet goals, they should earn compensation below the market median. For both annual incentives and the PCSU portion of long-term equity incentives, the Committee also sets minimum levels of performance. If these minimums are not achieved, then no compensation is earned for that element. Similarly, the actual value of SSARs varies depending on the increase or decrease in the price of Sonoco stock. If the stock price does not increase above the grant price, the executive realizes no value from the award.

The Committee believes that placing the majority of each executive’s total compensation at risk, with variable levels of payout possible, provides a strong incentive to achieve both short-term and long-term financial goals.

For annual cash incentives, we have established maximum annual incentive compensation levels as a percent of base salary for each executive officer position. Normally, officers will earn 50% of this maximum (which 50% approximates the competitive benchmark described above) at budget for each element in the plan, though the Committee can make adjustments to pay 50% of maximum above or below budget depending on the expected degree of difficulty in achieving budget in any one year.

Our long-term incentive program provides for awards of SSARs and PCSUs. To determine the target number of award shares in either case for each officer, the Committee uses the total direct compensation competitive benchmark (comprised of base salary, annual cash incentives and long-term equity incentives) for each officer position. The base salary competitive benchmark midpoint or actual base salary (whichever is greater) and the target (50% of the maximum incentive) for annual incentive compensation are subtracted from the total direct compensation competitive benchmark to arrive at the competitive benchmark dollars available for the long-term component of the compensation plan. These dollars are then converted to SSARs and PCSUs and each officer receives a mix of 75% PCSUs and 25% SSARs.

Providing this mix of 75% PCSUs and 25% SSARs is in line with the Committee’s philosophy of strongly encouraging long-term stock ownership among the officer group, while still providing some opportunity for the greater leverage inherent in stock-settled stock appreciation rights which are similar to stock options.

The Committee may further adjust the size of the award of PCSUs or SSARs above or below target based on individual officer performance. The actual value of the award for any individual officer is ultimately based on the Company’s achieving long term financial targets or increase in stock price. By adjusting actual award size based on individual performance, the Committee can also reward personal achievements and contributions or address other variations in individual performance.

Each year the Committee establishes the three-year performance targets for each element in the PCSU portion of the long-term incentive plan. These are based on an analysis of our prior performance, the economic environment and business outlook, and our forecasted growth potential. Incentive scales for vesting PCSUs are established for meeting threshold, target, and maximum goals, which in the judgment of the Committee

31

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

represent achievement of acceptable, superior, and outstanding performance levels, respectively. If we do not achieve at least the “acceptable” performance level, no award is earned at the end of the performance period.

We do not pay any current dividends or credit any dividend equivalents on unvested PCSUs in our long-term incentive plans. Dividend equivalents are accumulated from the time of vesting until the issuance of actual shares for any PCSUs that vest but are deferred until after separation from service by an individual executive officer. All PCSUs fully vest upon a change in control unless the acquirer assumes outstanding grants. In cases where grants are assumed, PCSUs will vest immediately if the change in control is followed by subsequent involuntary termination of the participant’s employment (except for cause) or voluntary termination for good reason (as defined in the plan) within 24 months of the change in control event.

Executive Benefit Elements

We have two benefit programs that apply only to executive officers: an Executive Life Insurance Program and a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”). The SERP is a part of the Omnibus Benefit Restoration Plan of Sonoco Products Company.

As stated earlier, the Committee has designed the overall compensation program to balance the attraction/retention objective against the performance oriented objectives. The annual incentive and long-term incentive programs are weighted more toward performance objectives, while the Executive Life Insurance Plan and the SERP are weighted more toward the attraction/retention objective.

Executive Life Insurance

Prior to 2005, the Executive Life Insurance Program consisted primarily of split-dollar life insurance. Under tax regulations in effect at the time, the cost to us was modest, consisting primarily of the time value of the money we used to pay the premiums. These types of life insurance programs were designed to allow companies to provide a significant benefit that served to enhance the retention of executives until normal retirement age. However, since 2004 regulatory changes have made this form of executive life insurance no longer viable or cost effective.

In response to these regulatory changes, in 2004, we took actions to convert split-dollar agreements entered into after 1995 for persons who were executive officers at that time into permanent life insurance policies in order to meet our commitments to the executive officers under the old contracts. The amounts of those new replacement life insurance policies (“Replacement Executive Life”) are fixed. Additional amounts of insurance are provided in the form of term life insurance (“Executive Term Life”). At the same time, the life insurance benefit for future executive officers was reduced and currently consists of term life insurance based on each executive officer’s base salary. For executive officers elected for the first time after April 20, 2004, this amount is equal to three times base salary.

The current limit on life insurance for most other active employees is $100,000. The Executive Term Life insurance program allows us to provide new executive officers with a benefit in line with the industry median.

32

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

The current CEO and other NEOs have the following amounts of life insurance benefits in effect from prior to April 20, 2004:

CEO — Five times base salary and target annual incentive compensation

Other NEOs — Three times base salary and target annual incentive compensation

The formula above is rounded down to the next $250,000 increment, but any increases in coverage must be equal to or exceed $500,000 before new policies are purchased.

In addition, with respect to the Replacement Executive Life policies, NEOs receive a “tax gross-up” payment in an amount sufficient to equal their tax liability on the insurance premiums attributed to them as income for tax purposes and on the gross-up amount.

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan

The SERP benefit we provide the NEOs, when combined with other Sonoco retirement benefits and Social Security benefits, is targeted to be equal in value to a Company-paid annuity of 60% of the NEO’s final average cash earnings, assuming age 65 retirement and 15 years of Company service. The calculation formula excludes long-term compensation in any form.

Historically, there have been two purposes for providing a SERP to executive officers:

| • | To provide at least the same benefit that the executive would
receive under our regular qualified retirement plan formula but
for IRS limitations on credited compensation and allowable
annual pension under qualified plans. |
| --- | --- |
| • | To enhance the attraction of mid-career executives and to retain
officers until age 65 by providing a pension calculation
formula that is somewhat greater than that used for the regular
qualified plan. |

Our corporate offices are located in a small town setting which provides challenges in attracting and retaining the type of executives we need to operate a global enterprise of our size and complexity. The SERP is a critical component in meeting these challenges because its accrual provisions allow us to attract experienced mid-career executives (the 15-year accrual period) and retain them for the full term (age 65 for maximum pension benefit).

In short, the SERP is designed to meet our unique attraction and retention needs and is an effective complement to the short-term and long-term incentive plans that are designed to motivate our executives to perform at the highest level.

During 2007, our Compensation Committee approved the changes described below to the SERP for persons promoted to officer after January 1, 2008 (none of the current NEOs participate in this new plan). These changes were made to align the SERP with recent changes in our all-employee retirement program and to more clearly communicate the additional value of the SERP. The changes were as follows:

• When an executive is promoted to officer, he/she will continue to receive the basic Company retirement benefit provided to all employees (including the “restoration” benefit under the Omnibus Benefit

33

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

Restoration Plan that is provided to employees whose wages or benefit accruals exceed the annual qualified retirement plan limits).

| • | The officer will receive an additional annual nonqualified plan
contribution (equal to 10% of the prior year’s salary and
earned bonus) rather than accrue a benefit based on years of
service and final average pay. Seventy-five percent (75%) of the
annual contribution will be invested in a fixed interest account
based on 120% of the IRS applicable long-term rate and 25% will
be issued in Sonoco restricted stock units. |
| --- | --- |
| • | After retirement, an officer’s defined contribution SERP
“account” will be paid over a limited period of time
(as elected in advance by the officer, in accordance with
Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) Section 409A as
discussed below) rather than over the officer’s (and where
applicable, spouse’s) lifetime(s). |

Consistent with the retirement benefit approach for new officers described above (i.e., a “restoration” benefit and separately identified SERP benefit), the SERP benefit for current officers (including the five NEOs) has been split into a restoration benefit that all employees (whose wages or benefit accruals exceed the annual qualified retirement plan limits) receive and a true supplemental benefit payable only to officers. This separate supplemental benefit may be taken as a life annuity or as a series of annual installments over a three year period. (Annual installments may be extended over more than three years if needed to eliminate adverse accounting treatment to Sonoco.)

A more detailed description of the SERP benefit, restoration benefit and the qualified pension plan benefits is set forth under the caption “Pension Restoration Benefit and SERP Benefit in the Restoration Plan” on page 55 of this proxy statement.

Executive Perquisites

In furtherance of our pay-for-performance philosophy, executive perquisites are very limited. Executive officers are permitted limited, occasional use of the company aircraft for personal travel or family emergencies. The CEO’s usage of the corporate aircraft is modest and helps minimize time involved in commercial travel that could otherwise be directed to our business. For other officers, use of the aircraft is minimal, is reviewed on a case by case basis, and is permitted only under circumstances where there is direct benefit to us to minimize time spent on personal travel or in the case of family emergencies.

Officers are also provided very limited “tax gross-ups” that are not provided for all employees. These are provided for taxable income imputed to the officers because of the Replacement Executive Life insurance premiums we pay as described above. These gross-up amounts are reflected in the “All Other Compensation” column in the “Summary Compensation Table” on page 46.

Some of the more common perquisites that we do not provide to our executive officers include country club memberships, company cars or drivers, metropolitan city apartments, vacation retreats, executive dining services, or reserved parking. We believe most of these benefits are not closely linked to our overall compensation objectives and would have only marginal impact on either the performance or the attraction/retention objectives of our compensation program.

34

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

Other Considerations

Employment Contracts and Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

We have a long standing practice of not providing employment contracts, severance agreements, change in control agreements, or other such financial security arrangements for our executive officers. Executive officers are covered by the normal severance compensation policy applicable to our salaried U.S. employees.

With some exceptions that do not apply to the NEOs, employees who are involuntarily terminated from the company are eligible for severance payments in the amount of two weeks’ compensation. Qualifying employees with at least three complete years of service who agree to sign and be bound by an agreement releasing us from all liabilities arising from the employment relationship, may receive up to 11 additional weeks’ severance. Compensation for years three through 13 may be paid on the basis of one week’s compensation for each complete year of service. Accordingly, the maximum standard severance payment to which a qualifying employee, including an NEO, could be entitled is 13 weeks’ compensation.

We may, however, from time to time negotiate individual severance compensation arrangements linked to non-compete agreements at the time of separation of an executive as circumstances warrant.

Our long-term equity incentive plans also contain provisions for prorated or accelerated vesting of equity awards in the event of retirement, death, or disability, and in certain cases, change in control. These provisions apply similarly to all plan participants, including those below the executive officer level.

Review of Overall Compensation Components and Aggregate Awards

To evaluate the overall competitiveness of the executive compensation program, each year at its April meeting, the Committee reviews the total compensation package for each executive officer. This includes review of a summary sheet showing a history of base salary adjustments, annual incentive awards and total cash compensation for the last ten years (or term as an executive officer, if less), stock options or stock-settled stock appreciation rights outstanding and the option price, vested and unvested restricted stock units, projected annual pension at age 65, and the amount of executive life insurance coverage.

The Committee also reviews a tally sheet for each executive officer showing each element of the total amount of compensation awarded and realized during the prior year. The Committee uses tally sheets to assess total executive compensation, to determine where total executive compensation falls in relation to peer companies, and to assess how the Company’s overall compensation programs operate. From this assessment, the committee makes changes in overall plans or individual elements if it determines they are appropriate to meet overall compensation objectives. As a result of this review in 2007, along with the consideration of the changes made in our all-employee retirement plan, the Committee approved changes to the Company’s SERP plan as described above.

The Committee does not have a practice of adjusting the size of current and future compensation awards or compensation program components to reflect amounts realized or unrealized by an individual from prior equity grants. In other words, awards are not increased to compensate for prior performance below target, nor are they decreased because of performance above target. Likewise, since earnings on equity compensation are

35

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

not included in the pension calculation formula, any gains, or lack thereof, from prior awards are not considered in setting or earning retirement benefits.

Tax and Accounting Treatment of Compensation

Deductibility of Compensation

The Committee has taken, and it intends to continue to take, reasonable steps necessary to assure our ability to deduct for federal tax purposes compensation provided to senior executives. However, such steps may not always be practical or consistent with the Committee’s compensation objectives. Given that the earnings limit for deductibility has remained fixed since 1993, and the value of some compensation elements cannot be determined until year-end, there are circumstances in which some executive compensation may not meet tax deductibility requirements. We can deduct all but $317,386 of the compensation shown in the Summary Compensation Table for 2007, excluding the value of equity-based awards which are subject to taxation in a later period.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

Certain of our nonqualified compensation and benefits arrangements, incentive programs, and corporate practices (such as severance, relocation, and expense reimbursements) are considered nonqualified deferred compensation and subject to IRC Section 409A. In general, Code Section 409A, restricts the timing and manner of payment (as well as the timing of participant elections) under these types of taxable compensation programs. Though final regulations under Code Section 409A are not fully effective, we have made adjustments to the programs to cause them to be in good faith compliance with the statutory provisions. The changes are not expected to have a financial impact on the Company nor a material impact on the way in which we compensate our NEOs.

Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation

Beginning January 1, 2006, we began accounting for stock-based compensation in accordance with the requirements of FAS 123R, which requires us to expense the estimated value of certain stock-based compensation.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

To emphasize the importance of linking executive and shareholder interests, the Board of Directors has adopted stock ownership guidelines for executive officers. The target level of ownership of common stock (or Common Stock Equivalents) is established as a fixed number of shares. The target level for the CEO is 140,000 shares. The target for Executive and Senior Vice Presidents is 33,000 and 24,000 shares respectively, and the target for other officers is 7,000 shares. Each executive subject to the guidelines is expected to achieve the ownership target within five years from the date on which he or she became subject to the guidelines. Common stock held in the Sonoco Savings Plan, stock equivalents earned through nonqualified deferred compensation programs, time vesting restricted stock units which vests within five years, and any other beneficially owned shares of common stock are included in determining compliance with the guidelines.

36

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

Shares that executives have the right to acquire through the exercise of stock options or stock-settled stock appreciation rights are not included in the calculation of stock ownership for guideline purposes. As of February 12, 2008, the CEO, CFO, and all other officers with more than three years in their current position met the above ownership guidelines.

We currently do not have a policy with respect to hedging the economic risks of stock ownership.

Relationship with Executive Compensation Consultant

Mr. Daniel J. Ryterband, of Frederic W. Cook and Company, has been hired by and serves as the Committee’s executive compensation consultant. Neither he nor other members of his firm provide services to us in any area other than executive compensation. The Committee has the sole authority to dismiss the consultant.

Mr. Ryterband is expected to assist the Committee and work on its behalf on matters related to the Committee’s purposes and responsibilities as set forth in the Committee charter summarized under the caption “Corporate Governance — Board Meetings and Committees of the Board — Executive Compensation Committee” on page 18. He advises the Committee as to trends in executive compensation and provides specialized studies or expert advice as requested with respect to executive compensation issues. Mr. Ryterband meets in private session with the Committee at least once per year and attends regular Committee meetings in person or by phone as requested. He also provides advice with respect to Director Compensation.

Management contacts with the consultant are limited primarily to the Senior Vice President of Human Resources and the Corporate Director of Compensation, who utilize the firm’s advice in the areas of compensation plan design and corporate governance issues. The CEO, CFO, and other executive officers may have incidental contact with the consultant.

The Committee believes this arrangement is appropriate and cost effective in meeting its responsibilities to shareholders and the needs of management for expert guidance and advice.

On a routine basis, members of management use consultants from other firms in areas where it is felt their expertise in specific executive compensation matters would be beneficial in developing proposals for the Committee to consider.

Role of Executive Officers in Determining Executive Compensation

Except for the CEO, the role of executive officers in determining executive compensation is primarily advisory in nature, especially with regard to the structure and composition of the compensation program. Each executive officer may make recommendations with regard to the size of awards for persons who report directly to him or her, but the CEO makes the final decision as to what is submitted to the Committee for its consideration.

The CEO attends Committee meetings, but is not present when his own compensation is discussed. He may have incidental contact with the Committee’s compensation consultant. In practice, this means that the CEO may from time to time attend meetings at which the Committee’s consultant is present or at which the consultant makes a presentation, and he may from time to time participate in group conference calls with the

37

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

Committee’s consultant. He does not, however, engage in one-on-one communications with the consultant and does not attempt to exercise any influence over the consultant’s recommendations to the Committee. The Committee has sole responsibility for determining the compensation for the CEO and for approving all other executive compensation.

Timing of Equity Grants

For many years it has been our practice to grant stock options, SSARs, PCSUs, or other equity awards on the date of the first regular Board of Directors meeting in the calendar year, which is the first Wednesday in February. We issue a press release announcing earnings information for the prior year that morning and the option or SSAR exercise price is based on the closing price of our stock on that date. The recipients and the corresponding number of shares of equity awards, including stock options or SSARs and PCSUs, are approved by the Committee at its regular meeting on the day prior to the Board of Directors meeting.

We occasionally make special stock option or SSAR awards to new employees. In such case, the exercise price is based on the closing price of our stock on the recipient’s first day of regular employment.

We also occasionally make stock option or SSAR awards or grants of restricted stock units to a corporate officer in recognition of a promotion or a change in position status. The effective date of these awards is the day following approval by the Committee.

Grants of Restricted Stock Units

We have a practice of making a special one-time grant of time vesting restricted stock units to individuals when they are first elected a corporate officer in recognition of this one-time event and the individual’s increased responsibility. The number of shares granted is based on position. The shares are credited with dividend equivalents, which are not paid out until the shares vest. The shares vest in three equal increments on the third, fourth, and fifth anniversary of the grant. The restricted stock units do not have voting rights.

No such grants were made in 2007 as no new officers were named.

Restatement or Adjustment of Performance Measures

The Committee has elected not to adopt a formal policy for adjustment or recovery of bonus awards or payments in the event that the performance measures upon which they are based are restated or otherwise adjusted in a manner that would reduce the size of an award or payment. The Committee prefers to retain the flexibility to address each such situation on its merits and determine the proper and appropriate course of action in fairness to shareholders and award recipients.

38

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

2007 COMPENSATION ACTIONS BY THE COMMITTEE

The following sections of this report include a discussion of the specific actions the Committee has taken with regard to 2007 compensation awarded to the NEOs and the rationale for those actions. The tables, accompanying narrative and footnotes which follow this report reflect the decisions covered by the discussion below.

Base Salary

Each year at its April meeting, the Committee reviews the base salary of all senior executives, including the CEO, the CFO and the other NEOs. The total amount of merit increases for the executive officer group as a whole takes into account market survey data as to the projected salary movement for executive positions at the surveyed companies during the calendar year, the average wage increase being given to other levels of our employees, and the current economic environment in which we are operating. Individual merit increase awards are based on each executive’s performance in his or her position during the past year, and the relationship of his or her current salary to his or her position’s base salary competitive benchmark midpoint. The Committee used these criteria to determine salary adjustments for the NEOs in 2007.

At its April, 2007 meeting, the Committee awarded Mr. DeLoach a base salary merit increase of 4.5% based on its evaluation of his performance and an upward movement of 3.5% in the competitive benchmark for his position. With this increase, his salary equated to 106% of the 2007 base salary midpoint for his position. The Compensation Committee considered the following specific achievements (primarily from 2006) in determining the amount of increase:

| • | Revenue, earnings before interest and taxes and earnings per
share were all above budget, |
| --- | --- |
| • | A record level of productivity with a 24% increase over 2005, |
| • | Successful integration of several acquisitions and joint
ventures, particularly in Europe, |
| • | Meeting budgeted expectations for cash flow including a
significant reduction in working capital, and |
| • | Further progress on the company’s succession plan. |

The Committee took into consideration all aspects of Mr. DeLoach’s performance and relative relationship to competitive market in granting a merit increase essentially comparable to that of other superior performers within the company.

The four other NEOs received merit increases ranging from 3.5% to 4.5%. NEOs who received merit increase percentages at the lower end of this range met most but not all of their financial or strategic objectives and achieved an overall acceptable performance rating. Those that received increases at the top level of the range exceeded the targets in their financial or strategic objectives and achieved above average performance for the past year. Some additional consideration in determining an individual’s increase was also given to any NEOs base salary that fell below the competitive benchmark assuming at least acceptable performance was achieved. These same criteria are applied across the entire salaried employee population. The average merit increase awarded to all of our United States salaried employees was 3.4% and individual awards in the overall salaried population ranged from 0% to 8.5%.

39

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

In addition to the merit increases in base salary, in 2007 the Committee provided a 1.5% base salary increase to each executive officer, including the NEOs, to compensate for elimination of the financial planning tax assistance allowance as discussed below under the caption “Value of Perquisites in 2007” on page 44.

Annual Cash Incentive Awards

In 2002, the Board of Directors adopted, and the shareholders approved, the Performance-Based Annual Incentive Plan for Executive Officers. Under the terms of this plan, an annual maximum of 2.75% of income from operations, as defined in the plan, was established as an incentive pool for the CEO and the other NEOs. The total amount of annual incentive awards paid to these individuals cannot exceed this maximum. For 2007, this maximum incentive pool was $10,153,605, which exceeded the amount of actual incentive awards made by the Committee to these participants.

Set forth below are the performance elements, and their respective weightings as a percentage of annual incentive compensation, the Committee used to arrive at actual 2007 annual incentive awards. The Committee’s philosophy is that annual incentive plan elements should be limited to three or fewer to maximize concentration on those most critical to the success of our business in the forthcoming year. Base earnings per share, revenue growth and working capital management are all considered to be key performance variables essential to maximizing shareholder value.

Incentive Plan Elements
Base Earnings per Share 60 %
Revenue Growth 20 %
Working Capital Improvement 20 %

Base earnings per share is defined as earnings per share excluding the impact of restructuring charges and certain non-recurring, infrequent or unusual items and are used to place primary focus on year over year operating results. Revenue growth excludes revenue from acquisitions completed during the year.

We believe that in most years, base earnings per share will be the most critical measure in driving share price and, in turn, shareholder value. Consequently, the Committee felt that a 60% weighting on this element was appropriate. Revenue growth was weighted at 20%. This is an important Company objective, but profitable revenue growth is of greater importance, hence the lower weighting than that for base earnings per share. Working capital improvement, which the Committee first included as a performance element in 2006 to encourage the pursuit of the opportunity to increase cash flow through reduction in our working capital requirements, was also weighted at 20%.

40

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

2007 Annual Incentive Plan Performance Targets

For 2007, the Committee established the following corporate performance measures for awarding annual incentive compensation. Based on year over year comparisons, the Committee believed these measures provided for reasonable growth and improvement, which, if achieved, would produce performance necessary to deliver consistent results for shareholders.

Threshold Target Maximum Actual 2007 — Performance
Base Earnings per Share
Amount $ 2.13 $ 2.32 $ 2.40 $ $2.38
Percent of Prior Year 100 % 109 % 113 % 111.7 %
Revenue (Excluding Acquisitions made in the year)
Amount (millions) $ 3,656.8 $ 3,784.8 $ 3,894.5 $ 3,962.4
Percent of Prior Year 100 % 103.5 % 106.5 % 108.4 %
Working Capital — Cash Gap Days
Reduction from Prior Year 0.00 2 days 4 days 4.2 days
Percent of Prior Year 100 % 95.7 % 91.4 % 90.6 %

The Committee also established an annual incentive compensation threshold, target and maximum payout expressed as a percentage of base salary for each NEO, as follows:

Compensation at Compensation at Compensation at Actual 2007
Threshold Target Maximum Percentage
H.E. DeLoach, Jr. 40 % 100 % 200 % 185.0 %
C.J. Hupfer 30 % 75 % 150 % 138.8 %
C.L. Sullivan, Jr. 32 % 80 % 160 % 148.0 %
M.J. Sanders 30 % 75 % 150 % 138.8 %
J.C. Bowen 30 % 75 % 150 % 138.8 %

These weightings are determined as described under the section titled “Determining Competitive Benchmarks — Total Direct Compensation” on page 30.

On February 5, 2008, the Committee reviewed and approved the 2007 annual incentive compensation awards for executive officers based on the predetermined financial measures and the calculations for actual performance against target shown in the tables above. No additional discretionary bonus awards were made to any of the NEOs in 2007.

At the end of 2007, our base earnings per share had increased by 11.7% over 2006 base earnings per share. As a result, all of the NEOs earned between target and maximum annual incentive compensation on the base earnings per share measure.

41

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

Growth in corporate revenue for 2007 (excluding acquisitions made in the year) was 8.4%, which exceeded the maximum goal of 6.5%. Therefore, all of the NEOs earned maximum annual incentive compensation earnings on this measure of performance.

The 2007 working capital results exceeded the maximum goal, contributing a significant increase in cash flow from operations and resulting in a maximum payout on this annual incentive compensation measure.

The following table shows the dollar amount of annual incentive compensation awarded to each of the NEOs for 2007 based on our 2007 performance discussed above and the percentage change in annual incentive compensation earnings from the prior year.

Annual Incentive — Compensation Percent Change from
Officer For 2007 Prior Year
H.E. DeLoach, Jr. $ 1,852,962 +7.5 %
C.J. Hupfer 573,891 +7.1 %
C.L. Sullivan, Jr. 736,701 +6.8 %
M.J. Sanders 588,435 +25.8 %
J.C. Bowen 542,449 +6.3 %

2007 Long-Term Incentive Program

As described above under the caption “Determining Competitive Benchmarks — Total Direct Compensation” on page 30, the 2007 long-term incentive program consists of two elements: SSARs and PCSUs, which are awarded pursuant to the shareholder approved 1991 Key Employee Stock Plan. As explained in that section, the base salary midpoint or actual base salary (whichever is greater) and the target (50% of the maximum incentive) for annual incentive compensation are subtracted from total direct compensation to arrive at the target dollars available for long-term compensation for each executive officer, and that target is converted 25% to SSARs and 75% to PCSUs.

For SSARs and PCSUs, awards were granted above, at or below the competitive benchmark depending on performance. For 2007, the NEOs who received shares above the competitive benchmark exceeded the targets in their financial or strategic objectives for the past year and demonstrated above average performance. Likewise, the NEOs who received shares at or below the competitive benchmark met all or most targets in their financial or strategic objectives and demonstrated acceptable performance for the year.

Stock-Settled Stock Appreciation Rights

On February 6, 2007 (the day prior to the full Board of Directors meeting), the Committee approved SSAR grants to 536 key employees, including the NEOs. The SSARs have a one-year vesting period and the grant price was set at $38.11 per share, the closing market price of our common stock on the date of grant (February 7, 2007). Accordingly, these SSARs will be valuable to the recipients only if the market price of our stock increases. The FAS 123R grant date fair values and the number of SSARs granted to each of the NEOs are included in the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table on page 49. Target grants were calculated as described under the caption “Determining Competitive Benchmarks — Total Direct Compensation” on page 30.

42

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

Based on individual performance factors, the Committee can adjust the actual number of shares granted under the plan either above or below the previously described competitive benchmark number. In this regard, the Committee increased the award of SSARs to Mr. DeLoach, by 5,000 shares to a total of 85,000 shares to reflect our exceeding budgeted sales and earnings, and a double digit increase in earnings per share, as well as Mr. DeLoach’s strong leadership in defining strategy and achieving significant progress in our overall growth objectives.

The awards to the other NEOs ranged from 5,500 shares above competitive benchmark to 3,000 shares below the competitive benchmark.

Performance-Contingent Restricted Stock Units

On February 6, 2007, the Committee also approved PCSU grants to 215 key employees, including the NEOs. The FAS 123R grant date fair values of PCSUs and the number of shares available at threshold, target, and maximum are shown in the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table on page 49. The number of PCSUs granted to each individual was based on their target awards as described under the caption “Determining Competitive Benchmarks — Total Direct Compensation” on page 30, and adjusted upward or downward from target based on the Committee’s judgment of the individual’s performance. The actual PCSU award to Mr. DeLoach was 11,500 shares above his target, and the awards for the other NEOs ranged from 2,000 shares above the competitive benchmark to 3,000 shares below the competitive benchmark.

The number of these PCSUs that will vest after three years is dependent on our achieving the specified performance levels set forth in the table below of cumulative base earnings per share, net of year to year changes in pension expense (“BEPS”), and average return on net assets employed (“RONAE”) for the three-year performance period. The Committee feels that both elements are critical drivers of long-term shareholder returns and has weighted them equally in the plan.

Threshold Vesting Target Vesting Maximum Vesting
Three-Year Compound Growth in BEPS 12.5% 19.1% 33.1%
Average Three-Year RONAE* 10.0% – 11.0% 10.5% – 11.5% 11.0% – 12.0%

callerid=999 iwidth=455 length=60

  • Actual performance level required within the range depends on capital invested in acquisitions over the three-year period. There are three ranges of acquisition investment for each performance level, which are established in advance and are not subsequently adjusted. The three ranges of new capital invested in acquisitions are (a) less than $500 million, (b) between $500 million and $1 billion and (c) more than $1 billion. The highest range of acquisition investment corresponds to the lowest range of RONAE above and vice-versa.

To encourage continued employment, the plan provides that if less than 50% of a participant’s PCSUs vest at the end of the three-year performance period, the remainder of that 50% of PCSUs will time vest in equal amounts in the fourth and fifth years of the plan, subject to the participant’s continued employment for that period. Except for death, disability, or retirement other than for cause, termination of a participant’s employment prior to vesting will result in forfeiture of any unvested award. Officers who do not meet our

43

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

stock ownership guidelines for their positions may not dispose of any shares that vest under this plan until such guidelines are met and maintained.

The plan does not permit the use of discretion if performance targets are not met. Performance goals will not be adjusted for sales, divestitures, or acquisitions of businesses.

Earned PCSU Awards in 2007

On February 1, 2005, the Committee granted PCSUs to 28 executives, including the NEOs. The vesting of these shares was dependent on achieving pre-determined levels of cumulative BEPS and average RONAE for the three-year performance period from January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2007.

Target performance over the three-year period was set at $5.64 cumulative BEPS as previously described, which equated to a compound annual growth rate of 6% per year, and from 9.0% to 10.0% average RONAE, depending on money spent on acquisitions. The two elements were weighted at 67% and 33%, respectively. Actual performance was $6.24 cumulative BEPS which resulted in 150% of the target cumulative BEPS shares vesting, and 9.68% average RONAE which resulted in 68% of the target RONAE shares vesting. As a result, the overall vesting was 122.7% of the target shares. The value of the shares vesting under this plan for the NEOs is shown in the “Option Exercises and Stock Vested” table on page 52.

As provided for under the plan, corporate officers including the NEOs, must defer receipt of all vested shares that are not deductible under Section 162(m). Whether required or not, all of the NEOs except Mr. Sullivan have elected to defer receipt of these shares until at least six months after separation from service with the Company.

Value of Perquisites in 2007

To further reduce executive perquisites, the Committee decided to eliminate the financial planning tax assistance allowance which allowed reimbursement for each officer the greater of 2% of base salary or $5,000 which was subsequently grossed up for taxes. The Committee eliminated this benefit and provided a 1.5% base pay increase for each officer effective on April 1, 2007.

Six executive officers used our aircraft for personal travel in 2007. This use is valued at the “aggregate incremental cost” to us, and was $32,585 in 2007 for the officer group as a whole. Included in this amount was Mr. DeLoach’s personal use of the aircraft which was valued at $26,453.

44

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Executive Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” included in this Proxy Statement with management. Based on that review and discussion, the Executive Compensation Committee recommended to our Board of Directors that the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, and in this Proxy Statement.

J.H. Mullin, III (Chair) C.J. Bradshaw C.C. Fort J.M. Micali M.D. Oken

45

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

Change
in Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Non-Equity Deferred
Stock Option Incentive Plan Compensation All Other
Name and Awards Awards Compensation Earnings Compensation
Principal Position Year Salary ($) Bonus ($) (1) ($) (2) ($) (3) ($) (4) ($) (5) ($) Total ($)
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (j)
Harris E. DeLoach, Jr. 2007 $ 1,001,601 $ -0- $ 2,117,432 $ 546,550 $ 1,852,962 $ 1,353,562 $ 402,087 $ 7,274,194
Chairman, President and 2006 949,669 -0- 2,166,454 468,800 1,705,890 2,745,769 397,028 8,433,610
Chief Executive Officer
Charles J. Hupfer 2007 413,615 (6) -0- 519,648 160,750 573,891 390,134 89,626 2,147,664
Senior Vice President and 2006 392,871 -0- 558,388 146,500 529,276 875,339 89,601 2,591,975
Chief Financial Officer
Charles L. Sullivan, Jr. 2007 497,771 (7) -0- 564,361 192,900 736,701 1,379,309 186,809 3,557,851
Executive Vice President 2006 474,331 -0- 592,358 175,800 681,614 1,306,604 190,117 3,420,824
M. Jack Sanders 2007 424,097 -0- 360,852 188,699 588,435 438,339 72,900 2,073,322
Executive Vice President 2006 (8)
Jim C. Bowen 2007 390,954 -0- 322,235 96,450 542,449 83,985 113,442 1,549,515
Senior Vice President 2006 374,094 -0- 369,086 111,340 503,979 455,780 115,071 1,929,350

callerid=999 iwidth=455 length=60

| (1) | Awards were made in the form of PCSUs. The vesting of awards is
tied to growth in base earnings per share (cumulative BEPS) and
improved capital effectiveness (average RONAE) over a three-year
period as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis
(“CD&A”) which begins on page 27. The
amounts shown are the aggregate charges in 2007 for awards made
in 2005, 2006, and 2007 under FAS 123R accounting rules.
The value of each individual award is based on the fair market
value, which is the target number of PCSUs times the
stock’s closing price on the date of grant. Assumptions
made in valuation of these awards are set forth in Note 10
to our financial statements for the year ended December 31,
2007, which are included in our 2007 Annual Report to
Shareholders . These values will not be realized at the end
of the performance period unless long-term performance goals are
met. The awards do not accumulate dividend equivalents until
after vesting and are not subject to accelerated vesting, except
upon a change in control in some cases. |
| --- | --- |
| (2) | Awards were made in the form of SSARs and were granted on
February 7, 2007. All 2007 SSARs have a grant price of
$38.11 per share, the closing market price of our common stock
on the date of grant. They become exercisable one year from the
date of grant and have a term of seven years. |
| | The grant date present values were estimated using a binomial
option-pricing model in accordance with the rules and
regulations of the SEC and are not intended to forecast
appreciation of our stock price. The 2007 SSARs had an estimated
grant date present value of $6.43. The assumptions used in the
binomial model are discussed in Note 10 to our financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2007, which are
included in our 2007 Annual Report to Shareholders . The
SSARs are not transferable, except by will, inheritance,
qualified domestic relations order or gift to or for the benefit
of family, and will not confer an actual dollar benefit on the
holder unless they are exercised at a time when the market value
of the stock |

46

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

| | exceeds the exercise price of the SSARs. The amount of any such
benefit which may be obtained by exercise of the SSARs is not in
any way predicted or controlled by the estimate presented. |
| --- | --- |
| | These awards are subject to accelerated vesting at retirement.
Since all of the NEOs except Mr. Sanders are retirement
eligible the full value of their 2007 awards is shown in
accordance with FAS 123R accounting rules. The amount shown
for Mr. Sanders is the charge made in 2007 for his award
under FAS 123R. |
| (3) | These amounts are awards pursuant to our annual incentive plan
as discussed on page 41 of the CD&A. The amounts shown
were paid to the NEOs in February 2008. None of the NEOs elected
to defer any of the amounts in this column. |
| (4) | For each NEO, except for Mr. DeLoach, the amounts shown in
this column are the aggregate change in the actuarial present
value of accumulated benefits under our pension plans shown in
the Pension Benefit Table on page 53, from the pension plan
measurement date used for our audited financial statements for
the year ended December 31, 2006 to the measurement date
used for the audited financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2007. In addition, for Mr. DeLoach,
$66,901 of this amount represents the above market portion of
interest credits on previously earned compensation for which
payment has been deferred on a basis that is not tax-qualified.
These amounts are determined using interest rate and mortality
rate assumptions consistent with those used in our financial
statements. |
| (5) | All other compensation for 2007 consisted of the following
components for each NEO: |

Company
Contributions and
Accruals to Defined
Executive Life Contribution
Name Perquisites(a) Insurance(b) Retirement Plans(c) Tax Gross-Ups(d)
H.E. DeLoach, Jr. $ 26,453 $ 167,983 $ 108,301 $ 99,350
C.J. Hupfer 38,318 37,717 13,591
C.L. Sullivan, Jr. 82,311 47,175 57,323
M.J. Sanders 21,184 35,439 16,277
J.C. Bowen 44,370 35,799 33,273

(a) Mr. DeLoach’s perquisites consisted of $26,453 for personal use of corporate aircraft, computed at the aggregate incremental cost to the Company. The aggregate incremental cost to us for corporate aircraft usage was $1,838 per hour in 2007, based on the cost of fuel, maintenance, parts, hourly rental rate for engines under maintenance service plan, and landing and crew expenses.

None of the other NEOs received perquisites in excess of $10,000.

(b) Includes our contributions under the Executive Life Insurance program (including the Executive Term Life policies and the Replacement Executive Life policies as previously discussed) and the economic value of frozen split-dollar life insurance arrangements entered into before 1996.

(c) Comprised of contributions to the Sonoco Savings Plan and accruals to individual accounts in the Omnibus Benefit Restoration Plan in order to keep employees whole with respect to our contributions that were limited by tax law.

(d) Reimbursement during 2007 for the payment of taxes on Company-provided Replacement Executive Life premiums.

47

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

| (6) | Mr. Hupfer elected to defer $24,817 of this amount into a
market rate interest account under the Deferred Compensation
Plan for Corporate Officers in compliance with IRS
regulation 409A. The value of this account will not be
payable until at least six months after his separation from
service from the Company. The Deferred Compensation Plan for
Corporate Officers is described under the caption
“Description of Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
Plans” on page 57. |
| --- | --- |
| (7) | Mr. Sullivan elected to defer $49,777 of this amount into a
Sonoco stock equivalent account under the Deferred Compensation
Plan for Corporate Officers in compliance with IRS
regulation 409A. The number of stock equivalent shares
credited to his account was based on the closing price of Sonoco
stock on the dates of the deferrals. These deferred stock units
will accumulate dividend reinvestments at the same rate paid on
all shares of our common stock. The units will not be payable
until at least six months after his separation from service from
the Company. Payments will be made in shares of stock. These
deferrals were made on a monthly basis and are included in the
Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table on page 49. The Deferred
Compensation Plan for Corporate Officers is described under the
caption “Description of Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
Plans” on page 57. |
| (8) | Mr. Sanders was not a NEO in 2006. |

48

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

2007 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

All Other Grant
Stock All Other Date
Awards: Option Exercise Fair
Estimated Possible Payouts Estimated Future Payouts Number of Awards: or Base Value of
Under Non-Equity Incentive Under Equity Incentive Shares of Number of Price of Stock and
Committee Plan Awards(1) Plan Awards(2) Stock or Securities Option Option
Grant Action Threshold Target Maximum Threshold Target Maximum Units(3) Underlying Options Awards Awards
Name Date Date ($) ($) ($) (#) (#) (#) (#) (#)(4) ($/Share) ($)(5)
(a) (b1) (b2) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) (k) (l)
H.E. DeLoach, Jr. 02-07-07 02-06-07 30,000 60,000 90,000 $ 2,286,600
H.E. DeLoach, Jr. NA 02-06-07 $ 400,640 $ 1,041,665 $ 2,003,202
H.E. DeLoach, Jr. 02-07-07 85,000 $ 38.11 546,550
C.J. Hupfer 02-07-07 02-06-07 7,000 14,000 21,000 533,540
C.J. Hupfer NA 02-06-07 124,085 322,620 620,423
C.J. Hupfer 02-07-07 25,000 38.11 160,750
C.L. Sullivan, Jr. NA 02-06-07 159,287 414,145 796,434
C.L. Sullivan, Jr. 01-31-07 104.1 4,008 (6)
C.L. Sullivan, Jr. 02-28-07 108.3 4,008 (6)
C.L. Sullivan, Jr. 03-31-07 106.7 4,008 (6)
C.L. Sullivan, Jr. 04-30-07 95.4 4,068 (6)
C.L. Sullivan, Jr. 05-31-07 94.0 4,068 (6)
C.L. Sullivan, Jr. 06-30-07 98.8 4,231 (6)
C.L. Sullivan, Jr. 07-31-07 115.4 4,231 (6)
C.L. Sullivan, Jr. 08-31-07 117.5 4,231 (6)
C.L. Sullivan, Jr. 09-30-07 140.2 4,231 (6)
C.L. Sullivan, Jr. 10-31-07 136.8 4,231 (6)
C.L. Sullivan, Jr. 11-30-07 139.3 4,231 (6)
C.L. Sullivan, Jr. 12-21-07 129.5 4,231 (6)
C.L. Sullivan, Jr. 02-07-07 02-06-07 7,750 15,500 23,250 590,705
C.L. Sullivan, Jr. 02-07-07 30,000 38.11 192,900
M.J. Sanders 02-07-07 02-06-07 6,250 12,500 18,750 476,375
M.J. Sanders NA 02-06-07 123,616 330,796 618,078
M.J. Sanders 02-07-07 22,500 38.11 144,675
J.C. Bowen 02-07-07 02-06-07 3,750 7,500 11,250 285,825
J.C. Bowen NA 02-06-07 117,286 304,944 586,431
J.C. Bowen 02-07-07 15,000 38.11 96,450

callerid=999 iwidth=455 length=60

| (1) | The amounts in columns (c), (d) and (e) represent the
threshold, target and maximum awards established for the 2007
Annual Cash Incentive Awards, as discussed on page 41 of
the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. As shown in this
section and reflected in column (g) of the Summary
Compensation Table, these awards were earned at 177.9% of target. |
| --- | --- |
| (2) | PCSUs awarded under the Company’s 1991 Key Employee Stock
Plan. Information about the performance-based conditions and
vesting of these awards is provided on page 43 of the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis section. |

49

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

| (3) | Salary deferrals under the Deferred Compensation Plan for
Corporate Officers of Sonoco Products Company. As explained in
footnote 7 to the Summary Compensation Table, Mr. Sullivan
elected to defer a portion of his base salary into a Sonoco
stock equivalent account. The stock units shown by his name in
this column summarize this deferral on a monthly basis. These
units accumulate dividends, which are reflected in the amounts
shown. |
| --- | --- |
| (4) | SSARs awarded under the Company’s 1991 Key Employee Stock
Plan. These awards have a one-year vesting period. Information
about determining the number of award shares is provided on
page 42 of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. |
| (5) | Grant date fair value calculated in accordance with
FAS 123R. The value for PCSUs is based on the number of
target shares times the stock closing price on the date of the
grant ($38.11). The value of the option awards (SSARs) is based
on a binomial model calculation of $6.43 per share on the date
of grant. |
| (6) | These amounts are equal to the dollar amount of compensation
deferred by Mr. Sullivan for the awards in column
(i) of this table. These amounts are included in columns
(c) and (j) of the Summary Compensation Table. |

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT 2007 FISCAL YEAR-END

Stock Awards
Equity Incentive
Equity Plan Awards:
Option or SSAR Awards Incentive Market or
Equity Plan Awards: Payout
Incentive Number of Value of
Number of Number of Plan Awards: Market Unearned Unearned
Securities Securities Number of Number of Value of Shares, Shares,
Underlying Underlying Securities Shares or Shares or Units, or Units, or
Unexercised Unexercised Underlying Units of Units of Other Other
Options Options Unexercised Option Option Stock That Stock That Rights That Rights That
(#) (#) Unearned Exercise Expiration Have Not Have Not Have Not Have Not
Name Exercisable Unexercisable Options Price Date Vested Vested(16) Vested Vested (16)
(a) (b) (c) (#)(d) ($)(e) (f) (#)(g) ($)(h) (#)(i) ($)(j)
H.E. DeLoach, Jr. 85,000 (1) $ 38.1100 02/07/2014
80,000 (2) 33.3700 02/01/2013
27,500 (14) $ 898,700
80,000 (3) 27.3100 02/02/2015
30,000 (15) 980,400
73,000 (4) 23.8600 02/04/2014
54,173 (13) $ 1,770,374
75,000 (5) 21.1500 02/05/2013
175,000 (6) 25.1300 02/06/2012
175,000 (7) 23.8000 02/07/2011
50,000 (8) 28.0625 02/03/2009
10,000 (9) 28.0000 07/21/2009
C.J. Hupfer 25,000 (1) 38.1100 02/07/2014
25,000 (2) 33.3700 02/01/2013
7,000 (14) 228,760
25,000 (3) 27.3100 02/02/2015
7,000 (15) 228,760
24,000 (4) 23.8600 02/04/2014
40,000 (5) 21.1500 02/05/2013
25,000 (11) 28.9300 04/17/2012
12,000 (6) 25.1300 02/06/2012
15,000 (7) 23.8000 02/07/2011
10,000 (8) 28.0625 02/03/2009
11,000 (10) 33.6932 02/04/2008
C.L. Sullivan, Jr. 30,000 (1) 38.1100 02/07/2014
30,000 (2) 33.3700 02/01/2013
7,500 (14) 245,100
30,000 (3) 27.3100 02/02/2015

50

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

Stock Awards
Equity Incentive
Equity Plan Awards:
Option or SSAR Awards Incentive Market or
Equity Plan Awards: Payout
Incentive Number of Value of
Number of Number of Plan Awards: Market Unearned Unearned
Securities Securities Number of Number of Value of Shares, Shares,
Underlying Underlying Securities Shares or Shares or Units, or Units, or
Unexercised Unexercised Underlying Units of Units of Other Other
Options Options Unexercised Option Option Stock That Stock That Rights That Rights That
(#) (#) Une arned Exercise Expiration Have Not Have Not Have Not Have Not
Name Exercisable Unexercisable Options Price Date Vested Vested(16) Vested Vested (16)
(a) (b) (c) (#)(d) ($)(e) (f) (#)(g) ($)(h) (#)(i) ($)(j)
7,750 (15) 253,270
25,000 (4) 23.8600 02/04/2014
45,000 (5) 21.1500 02/05/2013
40,000 (6) 25.1300 02/06/2012
40,000 (7) 23.8000 02/07/2011
M.J. Sanders 22,500 (1) 38.1100 02/07/2014
5,000 (14) 163,400
10,000 (12) 35.4200 10/16/2013
6,250 (15) 204,250
20,000 (2) 33.3700 02/01/2013
7,000 (5) 21.1500 02/05/2013
18,000 (6) 25.1300 02/06/2012
J.C. Bowen 15,000 (1) 38.1100 02/07/2014
19,000 (2) 33.3700 02/01/2013
4,750 (14) 155,230
19,000 (3) 27.3100 02/02/2015
3,750 (15) 122,550
15,000 (4) 23.8600 02/04/2014
40,000 (5) 21.1500 02/05/2013
16,000 (8) 28.0625 02/03/2009
17,600 (10) 33.6932 02/04/2008

callerid=999 iwidth=455 length=60

(1) These shares vested on 02/07/2008
(2) These shares vested on 02/01/2007
(3) These shares vested on 02/02/2005
(4) These shares vested on 02/04/2005
(5) These shares vested on 02/05/2004
(6) These shares vested on 02/06/2003
(7) These shares vested on 02/07/2002
(8) These shares vested on 02/03/2000
(9) These shares vested on 07/21/2000
(10) These shares vested on 02/04/1999
(11) These shares vested on 04/17/2003
(12) These shares vested on 10/16/2007
(13) These Restricted Stock Units were awarded to Mr. DeLoach
upon his election as Chairman of the Board of Directors. They
will vest on April 10, 2010 if he is actively employed by
the Company on that date. Dividend equivalents are being added
to these units, and are included in the number shown.
(14) These figures represent the number of threshold shares of PCSUs
that will vest on December 31, 2008 if performance criteria
are met. The actual number of shares that vest can vary from 0%
to 300% of those

51

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

| | threshold shares. If less than the number of threshold shares
vest on December 31, 2008, half of the remainder of the
threshold shares will time vest on December 31, 2009, and
the remaining half will time vest on December 31, 2010 if
plan participants are still employed by us. |
| --- | --- |
| (15) | These figures represent the number of threshold shares of PCSUs
that will vest on December 31, 2009 if performance criteria
are met. The actual number of shares that vest can vary from 0%
to 300% of those threshold shares. If less than the number of
threshold shares vest on December 31, 2009, half of the
remainder of the threshold shares will time vest on
December 31, 2010, and the remaining half will time vest on
December 31, 2011 if plan participants are still employed
by us. |
| (16) | Values of PCSUs shown in column (i) based on the
December 31, 2007 closing price of $32.68. |

2007 OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED

The following table provides information about options exercised by our NEOs in 2007 and about PCSUs that vested in 2007.

Option Awards — Number of Shares Stock Awards — Number of Shares
Acquired on Value Realized Acquired on Value Realized on
Exercise on Exercise Vesting (2) Vesting (3)
Name (#) ($)(1) (#) ($)
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e)
H.E. DeLoach, Jr. 155,000 $ 2,724,275 67,485 $ 2,205,410
C.J. Hupfer -0- -0- 17,178 561,377
C.L. Sullivan, Jr. -0- -0- 18,405 601,475
M.J. Sanders 31,500 463,845 6,135 200,492
J.C. Bowen 75,000 1,021,357 11,657 380,951

callerid=999 iwidth=455 length=60

| (1) | The difference between the market price of the common stock at
exercise and the exercise price. |
| --- | --- |
| (2) | PCSUs. Each of the NEOs listed, except Mr. Sullivan, has
elected to defer receipt of all of these shares until at least
six months following separation of service from the Company, and
has elected a payout option of one, two or three annual
installments. After vesting, the deferred shares begin to
accumulate dividend equivalents. |
| (3) | Based on the stock price of $32.68 on December 31, 2007,
the date of vesting. |

52

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

PENSION BENEFITS

Number of Years Present Value of — Accumulated Payments During
Credited Service Benefit(1) Last Fiscal Year
Name Plan Name (#) ($) ($)
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e)
H.E. DeLoach, Jr. Sonoco Pension Plan 21.0000 $ 621,021 $ 0
Omnibus Benefit Restoration Plan
Pension Restoration Benefit 21.0000 6,622,156 0
SERP Benefit 22.0000 9,084,651 0
Total 16,327,828
C.J. Hupfer Sonoco Pension Plan 31.0000 775,719 0
Omnibus Benefit Restoration Plan
Pension Restoration Benefit 31.0000 2,323,908 0
SERP Benefit 32.0833 1,594,679 0
Total 4,694,306
C.L. Sullivan, Jr. Sonoco Pension Plan 6.0000 177,404 0
Omnibus Benefit Restoration Plan
Pension Restoration Benefit 6.0000 699,356 0
SERP Benefit 7.3333 3,452,977 0
Total 4,329,737 (2)
M.J. Sanders Sonoco Pension Plan 19.0000 315,394 0
Omnibus Benefit Restoration Plan
Pension Restoration Benefit 19.0000 594,140 0
SERP Benefit 20.0000 937,967 0
Total 1,847,501
J.C. Bowen Sonoco Pension Plan 32.0000 594,699 0
Omnibus Benefit Restoration Plan
Pension Restoration Benefit 32.0000 1,750,481 0
SERP Benefit 35.5833 713,510 0
Total 3,058,690

callerid=999 iwidth=455 length=60

| (1) | Present value calculations are based on a discount rate of 6.40%
for the Sonoco Pension Plan and 6.27% for the SERP as of
December 31, 2007 and RP2000 Combined Healthy
postretirement mortality tables. |
| --- | --- |
| (2) | Mr. Sullivan’s SERP benefit includes $1,213,535 in
present value as of December 31, 2007 for the earned but
not yet vested portion of an additional three years of
service he will be credited if he continues to work until
age 65. |

The NEOs participate in two Sonoco-sponsored defined benefit pension plans: the Sonoco Pension Plan, a tax-qualified plan, and the Omnibus Benefit Restoration Plan of Sonoco Products Company (the “Restoration Plan”), a nonqualified supplemental retirement plan which has two separate defined benefit components: (i) the

53

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

Pension Restoration Benefit, which compensates our executive officers, as well as other employees, for any benefits lost under the Pension Plan because of pay and benefit limitations set by the Code, and, (ii) the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan Benefit (the “SERP”), which provides an additional benefit to our executive officers. Further information about these plans is provided below. We adopted the SERP in 1979 and amended and restated the SERP in 1994 to include the Pension Restoration Benefit. We believe the Pension Restoration Benefit and SERP help us to retain executives until age 65 and to attract and retain mid-career executives. Except for a special agreement with Mr. Sullivan, as discussed below under the caption “Pension Restoration Benefit and SERP Benefit in the Restoration Plan,” we do not have a policy regarding extra years of credited service under the plans.

We calculate the present values shown in the table using: (i) the same discount rates we use for FAS 87 calculations for financial reporting purposes (6.40% for the Sonoco Pension Plan and 6.27% for the SERP); and (ii) each plan’s earliest unreduced retirement age (age 65 for both the Sonoco Pension Plan and the SERP as discussed below). The present values shown in the table reflect postretirement mortality, based on the FAS 87 assumption (the RP2000 Combined Healthy table), but do not include an assumption of pre-retirement termination, mortality, or disability.

The elements of compensation considered in determining the pensions payable to the named officers are the compensation shown in the “Salary” and “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” columns of the Summary Compensation Table on page 46.

Sonoco Pension Plan

The Sonoco Pension Plan covers the majority of employees in the United States, and certain U.S. expatriate employees. Effective December 31, 2003, the Company froze participation for newly hired salaried and non-union hourly U.S. employees in this plan. The Sonoco Pension Plan provides participants with a life annuity annual benefit at normal retirement equal to the sum of A plus B minus C plus D below.

A. $42 multiplied by years of benefit service (up to 30); plus

| B. | 1.67% of five-year final average earnings multiplied by years of benefit service
(up to 30); minus |
| --- | --- |
| C. | 1.67% of the Social Security Primary Insurance Amount multiplied
by years of benefit service (up to 30); plus |

D. 0.25% of five-year final average earnings multiplied by years of benefit service in excess of 30 years.

Final average earnings are the average of the five highest calendar years (which do not have to be consecutive) of compensation. For this purpose, the NEOs’ earnings reflect salary and annual incentives that are paid in the same year subject to the annual limit imposed by the IRC ($225,000 in 2007).

Benefit service begins at the date of commencement of participation, which is January 1 or July 1 coincident with or following one year of service.

Participants become fully vested in their retirement benefit upon the earlier of completion of five years of service or attainment of age 55. The benefit is payable on an unreduced basis at age 65. Employees may

54

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

choose to commence their benefits as early as age 55, with subsidized early retirement reductions of 3.6% per year from age 65.

If the participant is disabled prior to retirement, the participant’s benefit is determined as if he or she terminated employment on the date of disability. Upon death prior to retirement, if the participant is fully vested and survived by his or her spouse, the spouse will receive a preretirement survivor annuity. The preretirement survivor annuity is equal to 50% of the accrued benefit in the Pension Plan, adjusted for the 50% joint and survivor form of payment and reduced for early commencement, and is payable at the later of the participant’s death or the participant’s earliest retirement age.

The Sonoco Pension Plan offers several optional forms of payment, including joint and survivor annuities and level income annuities. The benefit paid under any of these options is actuarially equivalent to the life annuity benefit produced by the formula described above.

Pension Restoration Benefit and SERP Benefit in the Restoration Plan

The Pension Restoration Benefit under the Restoration Plan is provided to Sonoco employees (including executive officers) for any benefits lost under the Sonoco Pension Plan because of pay and benefit limitations set by the IRC. Generally, the terms and conditions of the Pension Restoration Benefit (subject to the requirements of IRC Section 409A) are consistent with the provisions, terms and conditions of the Sonoco Pension Plan, which are discussed above under the caption “Sonoco Pension Plan.”

The SERP Benefit under the Restoration Plan is provided only to designated officers. With 15 years of service and retirement at age 65, it provides an annual payment equal to 60% replacement of final average earnings offset by the Sonoco Pension Plan benefit, the Pension Restoration Benefit and full Social Security benefits. Participants become fully vested in their SERP Benefit upon the completion of five years service in the SERP and attainment of age 55.

The annual SERP Benefit payable to a participant who separates from service and retires at age 65 is calculated by multiplying 4.0% of three-year final average earnings, with the product further multiplied by years of benefit service to a maximum of 15 years. If a participant retires prior to age 65, the retirement benefit is reduced by a fraction, the numerator of which is the participant’s total benefit service to the participant’s date of separation and the denominator of which is the participant’s benefit service projected to age 65. The retirement benefit is further offset by the participant’s Sonoco Pension Plan benefit, the Pension Restoration Benefit and full Social Security benefits. If a participant retires prior to age 62, the benefit is further reduced by subsidized early retirement reductions of 3% per year from age 62. (In this case, however, the Social Security benefit offset would not begin until the participant attains age 62).

Mr. DeLoach, Mr. Hupfer, Mr. Sullivan and Mr. Bowen are currently eligible for early retirement. Mr. Sanders will be eligible for early retirement upon attainment of age 55.

Final average earnings for the SERP Benefit are the average of the three highest calendar years (which do not have to be consecutive) of compensation in the last seven years before retirement. For this purpose, the NEOs’ earnings include salary and the annual incentive earned with respect to each such calendar year.

55

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

Benefit service under the SERP begins at the date of hire. However, to encourage his continued service to the Company, Mr. Sullivan will be credited with an additional three years of benefit service in addition to his actual years of service, if he is actively employed with the Company at age 65.

The SERP Benefit is payable as a 75% Joint and Survivor annuity for a participant who has been married for at least one year, and a 10-year certain and life annuity for all other participants.

Officers (including the five NEOs) appointed before January 1, 2008 may elect to receive the actuarially equivalent value of the SERP Benefit as a series of annual installments over a three-year period in lieu of monthly Joint and Survivor annuity or the 10-year certain and life annuity.

An officer is eligible for disability benefits under the Restoration Plan only if, at the time of disability, the officer has at least five years of service as an officer or has reached age 55.

If the officer is disabled before eligibility for early retirement, the annual Restoration Plan disability benefit is 60% of base salary, offset by benefits from the Sonoco Long Term Disability (LTD) Plan and combined family Social Security benefits, until the officer is eligible for early retirement benefits. If the early retirement SERP benefit, when added to the officer’s combined family Social Security benefits, Pension Restoration Benefit and Sonoco Pension Plan benefits, is less than 60% of base salary, the difference will be payable from the Sonoco LTD Plan. When the officer attains age 65, any benefit from the LTD Plan ends, but the SERP Benefit, the Pension Restoration Benefit and the benefits from the Sonoco Pension Plan would continue.

If the officer is disabled and is also eligible for early retirement, the annual Restoration Plan disability benefit payable is equal to the early retirement SERP benefit, the combined family Social Security benefits, the Pension Restoration Benefit, and Sonoco Pension Plan benefit. If the early retirement SERP benefit, when added to the officer’s combined family Social Security benefits and Sonoco Pension Plan benefit, is less than 60% of base salary, the difference will be payable from the LTD Plan. When the officer attains age 65, any benefit from the LTD Plan ends, but the SERP Benefit, the Pension Restoration Benefit and benefits from the Sonoco Pension Plan would continue.

NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION

Executive — Contributions Registrant — Contributions in Aggregate — Earnings in Withdrawals/ Aggregate — Balance at
in 2007(1)(2) 2007 2007(2)(3) Distributions End of 2007(2)(4)
Name ($) ($) ($) ($) ($)
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f)
H.E. DeLoach, Jr. $ 2,205,410 -0- $ (1,204,034 ) -0- $ 15,272,582
C.J. Hupfer 586,194 -0- (138,848 ) -0- 1,648,463
C.L. Sullivan, Jr. 651,253 -0- (181,323 ) -0- 1,985,421
M.J. Sanders 200,492 -0- (55,141 ) -0- 616,080
J.C. Bowen 380,951 -0- (99,361 ) -0- 1,471,672

56

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

callerid=999 iwidth=455 length=60

| (1) | Includes aggregate of deferred cash and equity compensation. The
value of equity deferral is based on the number of deferred
share units multiplied by the closing price of Sonoco stock on
the date of deferral (vesting date), which in all cases was
$32.68 per share on December 31, 2007. |
| --- | --- |
| (2) | The following table shows contributions and earnings that are
reported in the Summary Compensation Table on page 46 or
were reported in the Summary Compensation Table in previous
years. |

Amount in column Amounts in column — (f) previously
(b) reported as Amounts in column reported as
compensation in the (d) reported in the compensation in the Amounts in column (f)
Summary Summary Summary payable in
Compensation Table, Compensation Table, Compensation Table company stock
Name columns (c) and(j) columns (h) and(j) for previous years rather than cash
H.E. DeLoach, Jr. -0- $ 66,901 $ 7,811,929 $ 13,190,609
C.J. Hupfer $ 24,817 -0- 834,789 1,621,801
C.L. Sullivan, Jr. 49,777 -0- 1,050,147 1,985,421
M.J. Sanders -0- -0- -0- 616,080
J.C. Bowen -0- -0- 600,149 1,471,672

callerid=999 iwidth=455 length=60

| (3) | Amounts shown reflect accrued interest on deferred compensation
in interest bearing accounts and earnings growth, including
dividend credits for deferred compensation in stock equivalent
accounts. Any deferred compensation in stock equivalent accounts
are based on the December 31, 2007 closing stock price of
$32.68. |
| --- | --- |
| (4) | These amounts are comprised of previously earned compensation
for which payment has been deferred, and the subsequent
investment earnings on the deferred amount. We have made no
contributions to these aggregate balances. |

Description of Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans

From 1983 through 1989 executive officers and directors were eligible to participate in a salary/bonus deferral plan under which they could elect to defer a specific dollar amount of salary and/or bonus, which was to be paid out as a fixed monthly annuity for 180 months beginning in the January after the person’s reaching age 65. Mr. DeLoach is the only officer currently with the Company who made contributions to this plan. Under terms of the plan his monthly payout is fixed at $32,318.

In 1991, the Company implemented a new Deferred Compensation Plan for Corporate Officers. Each participant is eligible to make an irrevocable deferral election on an annual basis. The minimum deferral is $5,000 and the maximum annual deferral is 50% of compensation (salary and/or bonus) earned during the year for which the deferral election is made. Deferrals are made monthly from salary and annually from bonus payments. The participants may elect to invest the deferred compensation in the Interest Account or the Stock Equivalent Account. Deferrals initially made into one account may not be subsequently changed to the other account. The Interest Account accumulates interest each year at a rate equal to the Merrill Lynch ten-year high quality bond index listed on the preceding December 15. Deferrals into the Stock Equivalent Account are

57

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

converted into phantom stock equivalents as if Sonoco shares were actually purchased. Dividend credits are also credited to the Stock Equivalent Account as if shares were actually purchased. Payments from these plans are made annually after separation from service. For amounts deferred prior to January 1, 2006, participants could select payment schedules for periods of one to 15 years. For deferrals after January 1, 2006, the payment period was changed to one, three or five years. Under IRC Section 409A, amounts that were deferred after December 31, 2004 are subject to a minimum six month delay after separation from service with the Company. This plan is being administered in accordance with the provisions of IRC Section 409A. Only Mr. Hupfer and Mr. Sullivan elected to participate in this plan in 2007. The amount of their deferral is shown in footnote 2 above for column (b) in the table.

Executive officers who participate in the PCSU portion of the Company’s long-term incentive plan as described on page 43 of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis or who receive a special grant of restricted stock units as described on page 38 of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis may make an irrevocable election to defer receipt of any shares that vest until after their separation from service with the Company. Deferral elections made during or after 2003 must be for at least six months after separation from service with the Company. Additionally, receipt of any such units that vest and are not deductible under IRC 162m must be deferred until at least six months following separation of service. At the time of deferral, officers must elect a payment schedule of one, two, or three annual installments. Time vesting restricted stock units accrue dividend equivalents from the date of grant. PCSUs accrue dividend equivalents only after vesting. There are no provisions for accelerated payouts of deferrals in the event of a change in control. All of the NEOs, except Mr. Sullivan, elected to defer receipt of their PCSUs which vested on December 31, 2007 and are shown in the 2007 Option Exercises and Stock Vested table on page 52. These amounts are included in column (b) of the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation table above.

The amounts shown in column (f) above would have been payable according to each NEO’s elected schedule which can range from one to 15 annual installments subject to the provisions of IRC 409A as described above, had separation from service occurred on December 31, 2007.

58

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

POTENTIAL BENEFITS PAYABLE IMMEDIATELY UPON CERTAIN SEPARATION EVENTS

The table below and the notes that follow set forth estimates of the amounts that would have been payable to each of the NEOs had the specified events occurred on December 31, 2007.

Death
Eligible Benefits
Payable from Death All Other Termination Events
Executive Life Pension Restoration Pension Restoration
Insurance Plan and SERP And SERP
(Lump Sum) Benefits (Annual) Benefits (Annual)
Name (a) ($) Plan Name (b) ($) (c) ($)
H.E. DeLoach, Jr. $ 10,000,000 Pension Restoration Benefit $ 307,021 $ 681,134
SERP 793,444 870,878
Total 1,100,465 1,552,012
C.J. Hupfer 2,000,000 Pension Restoration Benefit 112,727 248,051
SERP 214,532 219,054
Total 327,259 467,105
C.L. Sullivan, Jr. 2,500,000 Pension Restoration Benefit 31,713 70,977
SERP 403,929 203,941
Total 435,642 274,918
M.J. Sanders 2,500,000 Pension Restoration Benefit 32,646 70,838
SERP 180,786 146,542
Total 213,432 217,380
J.C. Bowen 2,000,000 Pension Restoration Benefit 92,904 199,923
SERP 206,951 138,001
Total 299,855 337,924

callerid=999 iwidth=455 length=60

| (a) | Eligible Death Benefits shown are as of February 5, 2008
and are comprised of certain split-dollar life insurance
arrangements entered into prior to 1996, executive benefit life
insurance policies that replaced split-dollar life insurance
arrangements entered into after 1995 and term life insurance
policies — all as described on page 32 of the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis. These benefits are fully
insured and payable upon death by the insurance carrier(s). |
| --- | --- |
| (b) | The SERP Benefits (payable as a 75% surviving spouse benefit)
and the Pension Restoration Benefits (payable as a 50% surviving
spouse benefit) that are due upon the death of a participant
(the pre-retirement death benefits) are payable for the lifetime
of the NEO’s spouse. As discussed above under the caption
“Pension Restoration Benefit and SERP Benefit in the
Restoration Plan,” the SERP Benefit has been offset by the
50% surviving spouse benefit from the Sonoco Pension Plan and
estimated Social Security survivor benefits, as applicable.
Benefits in this column for Mr. Sanders have been
calculated based on an assumed commencement date of June 1,
2008 (his earliest commencement date under the Restoration Plan). |

59

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

(c) All Other Termination Events (excluding events covered in columns (a) and (b)) provide an annual SERP Benefit and a Pension Restoration Benefit (if applicable) payable to the NEOs for their lifetimes, in addition to benefits payable from the Sonoco Pension Plan and Social Security (if applicable). The SERP Benefit and the Pension Restoration Benefit do not include an offset for Social Security for Mr. Hupfer, Mr. Sanders or Mr. Bowen, as they are not yet eligible for Social Security benefits. A 75% post-retirement survivor benefit is payable to the surviving spouse of those participants who were married for at least one year on the date of their retirement. Participants who are not eligible for the 75% post-retirement survivor benefit at retirement receive benefits under a 10-year certain and life annuity arrangement. Benefits in this column for Mr. Sanders have been calculated based on an assumed commencement date of June 1, 2008 (his earliest commencement date under the Restoration Plan).

The amounts that would have been paid to each NEO with respect to deferred compensation had death, disability, retirement or any other termination of employment occurred on December 31, 2007 are set forth in column (f) of the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation table, and the method of determining the benefits payable and payment arrangements are described in the narrative following that table.

60

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Employee directors do not receive any additional compensation for serving on the Board of Directors. Compensation for non-employee directors is summarized below.

For the first quarter of 2007, non-employee directors received a $25,000 quarterly retainer and a fee of $1,500 for each Board of Directors or committee meeting attended. Committee chairs received an additional $1,000 per committee meeting, and the Audit Committee chair also received a committee chair retainer of $1,250 per quarter. A minimum of 50% of the $25,000 quarterly retainer was required to be deferred into Sonoco stock equivalent units, which accrue dividend equivalents and are distributed in stock or cash upon termination of Board service. Directors could also elect to defer a portion or all of the remaining retainer and meeting fees. They could choose to have these additional deferrals earn interest credits at a specified market rate (the Merrill Lynch Ten-Year High Quality Bond Index which was 5.75% for 2007) or be treated as if invested in equivalent units of Sonoco common stock (which are credited with reinvested dividend equivalents). Such elections were made in the prior calendar year.

Based on comparisons of our Company to national surveys of director compensation and an independent study of peer packaging companies, the Board of Directors approved the following changes effective April 1, 2007. The non-employee directors’ quarterly retainer was increased to $28,750, of which a minimum of $14,375 must be deferred into Sonoco stock equivalent units which accrue dividend equivalents and are distributed upon termination of Board service.

Committee chairs received a quarterly Committee chair retainer instead of the additional $1,000 per committee meeting fee. The Audit Committee chair received a committee chair retainer of $3,750 per quarter. The Executive Compensation Committee chair received a committee chair retainer of $3,125 per quarter. The Financial Policy, Corporate Governance and Nominating, and Employee/Public Responsibility Committee chairs each received a committee chair retainer of $2,500 quarterly.

Beginning in 2008, the amount of the quarterly retainer remains the same at $28,750, but a minimum of $16,250 must be deferred into Sonoco stock equivalent units, which accrue dividend equivalents and are distributed upon termination of Board service. All other fees and chair retainers remain the same for 2008. Board members still receive a fee of $1,500 for each Board of Directors or Committee meeting attended.

No director had a compensation arrangement that differed from the program described above.

61

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

The following table sets forth information regarding the compensation earned by each non-employee director who served on our Board of Directors in 2007.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE

Changes in
Pension Value
and
Fees Nonqualified
Earned or Non-Equity Compensation
Paid in Option Incentive Plan Earnings
Cash ($) Stock Awards ($) Compensation $ All Other Total
Name (1) Awards ($) (2) ($) (3) Compensation ($) ($)
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h)
C.J. Bradshaw $ 142,750 $ 29,905 $ 172,655
R.J. Brown (Retired) 29,500 10,000 (4) 39,500
F.L.H. Coker (Retired) 91,500 7,243 10,000 (4) 108,743
J.L. Coker 130,750 130,750
P.L. Davies 139,750 139,750
C.C. Fort 146,750 146,750
B.L.M. Kasriel (Resigned) 35,000 35,000
E.H. Lawton, III 132,250 132,250
J.E. Linville 145,750 145,750
J.M. Micali 157,250 157,250
J.H. Mullin, III 158,125 158,125
M.D. Oken 154,000 154,000
P.R. Rollier 96,750 96,750
T.E. Whiddon 144,500 144,500

callerid=999 iwidth=455 length=60

(1) A portion of the fees shown in the “Fees Earned or Paid in Cash” column has been deferred into full value stock units of the Company. The number of stock units received is calculated by dividing the amount of deferred fees by the closing stock price on the date the fees would otherwise become payable, which is the first day of each calendar quarter. Sonoco stock equivalent units acquired from the deferrals accumulate dividend equivalents until disbursement.

Payouts of the deferred Sonoco stock equivalent units will commence in the January following termination of Board service, and may be made either in shares of Sonoco common stock or cash. Directors may elect to have these deferred payments made in one, three, or five annual installments.

62

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

The table below shows the amount of 2007 fees deferred by each director and the payout schedule elected.

Fees Deferred Into — Sonoco Stock Payout Schedule
Director Equivalent Units Election in Years
C.J. Bradshaw $ 55,625 5
R.J. Brown (Retired) 12,500 3
F.L.H. Coker (Retired) 41,250 1
J.L. Coker 55,625 1
P.L. Davies 55,625 3
C.C. Fort 55,625 3
B.L.M. Kasriel (Resigned) 12,500 1
E.H. Lawton, III 55,625 1
J.E. Linville 55,625 5
J.M. Micali 105,625 1
J.H. Mullin, III 55,625 3
M.D. Oken 55,625 1
P.R. Rollier -0- (5) N/A
T.E. Whiddon 55,625 3
(2) No stock options or SSARs were awarded to directors in 2007.
(3) Above market portion of interest credits on previously earned
compensation for which payment was deferred on a basis that is
not tax-qualified.
(4) Contributions to a charity made on behalf of Mr. R. J.
Brown and F. L. H. Coker upon their retirement from the Board.
Neither Mr. Brown nor Mr. Coker received any economic
benefit from the contribution. While we do not have a formal
program to provide this type of benefit, it is a practice that
we have followed at each director’s retirement for a number
of years.
(5) Mr. Rollier joined the Board on July 18, 2007. Under
IRC 409A, a deferral election must be made prior to the year
compensation is earned.

63

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS OR FEES DEFERRED INTO SONOCO STOCK EQUIVALENT UNITS AT FISCAL YEAR END (12/31/2007)

Fees Deferred Into — Sonoco Stock Equivalent Units Stock Options — Number
Name Number Value(1) Of Shares(2)
C.J. Bradshaw 8,348.7 $ 272,836 27,200
R.J. Brown (Retired) 9,809.7 320,581 -0-
F.L.H. Coker (Retired) 2,705.2 88,406 -0-
J.L. Coker 3,182.0 103,988 22,200
P.L. Davies 3,182.0 103,988 7,000
C.C. Fort 3,182.0 103,988 18,500
B.L.M. Kasriel (Resigned) 8,003.4 261,551 -0-
E.H. Lawton, III 3,182.0 103,988 36,839
J.E. Linville 3,182.0 103,988 6,000
J.M. Micali 4,570.7 149,370 11,000
J.H. Mullin, III 6,557.8 214,309 15,000
M.D. Oken 3,128.4 102,236 -0-
T.E. Whiddon 3,182.0 103,988 20,000

callerid=999 iwidth=455 length=60

| (1) | Based on the December 31, 2007 closing price of $32.68 per
share. |
| --- | --- |
| (2) | Since 2005, directors have no longer been granted stock options
or allowed to defer retainer or meeting fees into stock options. |

64

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

APPROVAL OF THE 2008 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

On February 6, 2008, the Board of Directors adopted the 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) for a term of ten years, subject to the approval of the stockholders at this Annual Meeting. The following summary of the principal features of the Plan is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Plan which is appended to this Proxy Statement as Exhibit 1.

Summary of the Plan

Purpose of the Plan. The purpose of the Plan is to assist us and our subsidiaries in attracting and retaining selected individuals who, serving as our employees, directors, consultants and/or advisors, are expected to contribute to our success and to achieve long-term objectives which will benefit our stockholders through the additional incentives inherent in the awards under the Plan.

Shares Available. The maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued under the Plan (subject to the adjustment provisions described under “Adjustments upon Changes in Capitalization” below) is 8,500,000 shares of Common Stock, less one (1) share of Common Stock for every one (1) share of Common Stock that was subject to a stock option or stock appreciation right (“SAR”) granted after December 31, 2007 under our 1991 Key Employee Stock Option Plan and our 1996 Non-Employee Directors Stock Plan (collectively, the “Prior Plans”) and two and one-half (2.5) shares of Common Stock for every one (1) share of Common Stock that was subject to an award other than an option or SAR granted after December 31, 2007 under the Prior Plans. Any shares of Common Stock that are subject to options or SARs granted under the Plan shall be counted against this limit as one (1) share of Common Stock for every one (1) share of Common Stock granted. Any shares of Common Stock that are subject to awards other than options or SARs granted under the Plan shall be counted against this limit as two and one-half (2.5) shares of Common Stock for every one (1) share of Common Stock granted. After the Effective Date, no awards may be granted under the Prior Plans.

If any share of common stock subject to an award under the Plan or, after December 31, 2007 any shares of Common Stock subject to an award under the Prior Plans, are forfeited, expire or are settled for cash, the shares subject to the award may be used again for awards under the Plan to the extent of the forfeiture, expiration or cancellation. The shares of Common Stock will be added back as one (1) share if the shares were subject to options or SARs granted under the Plan or under the Prior Plans and (ii) as two and one-half (2.5) shares if the shares were subject to awards other than options or SARs granted under the Plan or under the Prior Plans. The following shares of Common Stock will not be added to the shares authorized for grant as described above: (i) shares tendered by the participant or withheld by us in payment of the purchase price of an option, (ii) shares tendered by the participant or withheld by us to satisfy tax withholding with respect to an award, and (iii) shares subject to a SAR that are not issued in connection with the stock settlement of the SAR on exercise. Shares of Common Stock under awards made in substitution or exchange for awards granted by a company acquired by us or a subsidiary, or with which we or any subsidiary combine(s), do not reduce the maximum number of shares that may be issued under the Plan. In addition, if a company acquired by us or a subsidiary, or with which we or any subsidiary combine(s), has shares remaining available under a plan approved by its stockholders, the available shares (adjusted to reflect the exchange or valuation ratio in the acquisition or combination) may be used for awards under the Plan and will not reduce the maximum number

65

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

of shares that may be issued under the Plan; provided, however that awards using such available shares shall not be made after the date awards or grants could have been made under the pre-existing plan, absent the acquisition or combination, and shall only be made to individuals who were not our employees or directors prior to the acquisition or combination.

The maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued under the Plan pursuant to the exercise of incentive stock options is 8,500,000 shares.

Eligibility. Options, SARs, restricted stock awards, restricted stock unit awards and performance awards may be granted under the Plan. Options may be either “incentive stock options,” as defined in Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), or nonstatutory stock options. Awards may be granted under the Plan to any employee, non-employee member of the Board of Directors, consultant or advisor who is a natural person and provides services to us or a subsidiary, except for incentive stock options which may be granted only to our employees.

Awards to be Granted to Certain Individuals and Groups. As of February 6, 2008, approximately 859 employees and non-employee directors had been designated as eligible to participate in the Plan. The Executive Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”), in its discretion, selects the persons to whom awards may be granted, determines the type of awards, determines the times at which awards will be made, determines the number of shares subject to each such award (or the dollar value of certain performance awards), and determines the other terms and conditions relating to the awards. For this reason, it is not possible to determine the benefits or amounts that will be received by any particular person in the future.

Limits on Awards to Participants. The Plan provides that no participant may be awarded in any 36-month period options or SARs to purchase more than 2,000,000 shares of Common Stock, or earn restricted stock awards, restricted stock unit awards, performance awards or other share based awards that are intended to be “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code with respect to more than 500,000 shares. Shares subject to a cancelled award continue to count against the applicable limit. The maximum dollar value that may be granted to any participant in any 12-month period with respect to performance-based awards that are intended to be “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code is $5,000,000. The dollar value of a cancelled award will continue to count against the $5,000,000 limit.

Administration. The Plan will be administered by the Committee (or a subcommittee) which shall consist of at least two members of the Board of Directors, each of whom must qualify as a “non-employee director” under Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, an “outside director” under Section 162(m) of the Code and an “independent director” under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange. The Committee has the authority to determine the terms and conditions of awards, and to interpret and administer the Plan. The Committee may delegate to a committee of one or more directors the right to make awards and to cancel or suspend awards and otherwise take action on its behalf under the Plan, and, to the extent permitted by law, the Committee may delegate to an executive officer or a committee of executive officers the right to make awards to employees who are not directors or executive officers.

66

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

Stock Options. The Committee may grant either non-qualified stock options or incentive stock options (which qualify for specified tax status under Section 422 of the Code). A stock option entitles the recipient to purchase a specified number of shares of common stock at a fixed price subject to terms and conditions set by the Committee. The purchase price of shares covered by a stock option cannot be less than 100% of the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date the option is granted. Fair market value of the Common Stock is generally equal to the closing price for the Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the date the option is granted (or if there was no closing price on that date, on the last preceding date on which a closing price was reported). As of February 6, 2008, the closing price of our common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange was $29.30 per share.

The Plan permits payment of the purchase price of stock options to be made by cash or cash equivalents, shares of Common Stock previously acquired by the participant, any other form of consideration approved by the Committee and permitted by applicable law (including withholding of shares of Common Stock that would otherwise be issued on exercise), or any combination thereof. Options granted under the Plan expire no later than 10 years from the date of grant, except in the event of the participant’s death or disability.

Stock Appreciation Rights. The Committee is authorized to grant SARs in conjunction with a stock option or other award granted under the Plan, and to grant SARs separately. The grant price of a SAR may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of a share of Common Stock on the date the SAR is granted. The term of a SAR may be no more than 10 years from the date of grant, except in the event of death or disability.

Upon exercise of an SAR, the participant will have the right to receive the excess of the fair market value of the shares covered by the SAR on the date of exercise over the grant price. Payment may be made in cash, shares of our Common Stock or other property, or any combination thereof, as the Committee may determine. Shares issued upon the exercise of SARs are valued at their fair market value as of the date of exercise.

Restricted Stock Awards. Restricted stock awards may be issued either alone or in addition to other awards granted under the Plan, and are also available as a form of payment of performance awards and other earned cash-based incentive compensation. The Committee determines the terms and conditions of restricted stock awards, including the number of shares of Common Stock granted, and any conditions for vesting that must be satisfied, which typically will be based principally or solely on continued provision of services, but may include a performance-based component. Awards of restricted stock that vest solely on continued employment generally will have a minimum vesting period of three years (which may be pro rata), except in the case of death, disability, retirement, a change in control, or special circumstances determined by the Committee, such as achievement of performance objectives. Grants to new hires to replace forfeited awards from a prior employer, and grants in payment of performance awards or other earned cash-based incentive compensation will have a minimum vesting period of one year. The minimum vesting period requirements do not apply to restricted stock awards or restricted stock unit awards to directors or consultants or advisors. Unless otherwise provided in the award agreement, the holder of restricted stock awards will have the rights of a shareholder from the date of grant of the award, including the right to vote the shares and the right to receive distributions on the shares. Except as otherwise provided in the award agreement, any shares or other property (other than cash) distributed with respect to the award will be subject to the same restrictions as the award.

67

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

Restricted Stock Unit Awards. Awards of restricted stock units having a value equal to an identical number of shares of Common Stock may be granted either alone or in addition to other awards granted under the Plan, and are also available as a form of payment of performance awards granted under the Plan and other earned cash-based incentive compensation. The Committee determines the terms and conditions of restricted stock units, subject to the same vesting limitations discussed above for restricted stock awards. The holder of a restricted stock unit award will not have voting rights with respect to the award. Except as otherwise provided in the award agreement, any shares or other property (other than cash) distributed with respect to the award will be subject to the same restrictions as the award.

Performance Awards. Performance awards provide participants with the opportunity to receive shares of Common Stock, cash or other property based on performance and other vesting conditions. Performance awards may be granted from time to time as determined at the discretion of the Committee. Subject to the share limit and maximum dollar value set forth above, the Committee has the discretion to determine (i) the number of shares of common stock under, or the dollar value of, a performance award and (ii) the conditions that must be satisfied for grant or for vesting, which typically will be based principally or solely on achievement of performance goals. The minimum performance period under a performance award is 12 months and the maximum performance period is five years.

Other Share-Based Awards. The Plan also provides for the award of shares of Common Stock and other awards that are valued by reference to Common Stock or other property (“Other Share-Based Awards”). Such awards may be granted above or in addition to other awards under the Plan. Other Share-Based Awards may be paid in cash, shares of Common Stock or other property, or a combination thereof, as determined by the Committee. The Committee determines the terms and conditions of Other Share-Based Awards, subject to the same vesting limitations discussed above for restricted stock awards.

Performance Criteria. At the Compensation Committee’s discretion, performance goals for restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, performance awards or other share-based awards may be based on the attainment of specified levels of one or more of the criteria set forth in the Plan. The performance goals also may be based solely by reference to our performance or the performance of one or more of our subsidiaries, divisions, business segments or business units, or based upon the relative performance of other companies or upon comparisons of any of the indicators of performance relative to other companies. The Committee may also exclude under the terms of the performance awards the impact of an event or occurrence which the Committee determines should appropriately be excluded, including (i) restructurings, discontinued operations, extraordinary items, and other unusual or non-recurring charges, (ii) an event either not directly related to our operations or not within the reasonable control of our management, or (iii) the cumulative effects of tax or accounting changes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Adjustments. The Committee may make downward, but not upward, adjustments with respect to any amount payable pursuant to any restricted stock award, restricted stock unit award, performance award or other share-based payment award that is subject to performance criteria. The Committee may not waive achievement of performance goals, except in the case of death, disability or as otherwise determined by the Committee in special circumstances.

68

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

Dividends; Dividend Equivalents. Awards other than options and SARs may, if determined by the Committee, provide that the participant will be entitled to receive, currently or on a deferred basis, cash, stock or other property dividends, or cash payments in amounts equivalent to cash, stock, or other property dividends declared with respect to shares of Common Stock covered by an award. The Committee may provide that such amounts will be deemed to have been reinvested in additional shares of Common Stock or otherwise, and that they are subject to the same vesting or performance conditions as the underlying award.

No Repricing. The Plan prohibits option and SAR repricings (other than to reflect stock splits, spin-offs or other corporate events described under “Adjustments upon Changes in Capitalization” below) unless stockholder approval is obtained. For purposes of the Plan, a “repricing” means a reduction in the exercise price of an option or the grant price of a SAR, the cancellation of an option or SAR in exchange for cash or another award (except for awards granted in assumption of or in substitution for awards previously granted by a company acquired by us or with which we combine) under the Plan if the exercise price of the option is greater than the fair market value of the Common Stock, or any other action with respect to an option or SAR that may be treated as a repricing under New York Stock Exchange rules.

Nontransferability of Awards. No award under the Plan, and no shares subject to awards that have not been issued or as to which any applicable restriction, performance or deferral period has not lapsed, is transferable other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution, and an award may be exercised during the participant’s lifetime only by the participant or the participant’s estate, guardian or legal representative, except that the Committee may provide in an award agreement that a participant may transfer an award to certain family members, family trusts, or other family-owned entities, or for charitable donations under such terms and conditions determined by the Committee.

Adjustments upon Changes in Capitalization. In the event of any merger, reorganization, consolidation, recapitalization, dividend or distribution (whether in cash, shares or other property, other than a regular cash dividend), stock split, reverse stock split, spin-off or similar transaction or other change in our corporate structure affecting our Common Stock or the value thereof, appropriate adjustments to the Plan and awards will be made as the Committee determines to be equitable and appropriate, including adjustments in the number and class of shares of stock subject to the Plan, the number, class and option or exercise price of shares subject to awards outstanding under the Plan, and the limits on the number of awards that any person may receive.

Termination of Employment. The Committee will determine and set forth in the award agreement whether any awards will continue to be exercisable, and the terms of such exercise, on and after the date the participant ceases to be employed by, or to otherwise provide services to, us, whether by reason of death, disability, voluntary or involuntary termination of employment or service, or otherwise.

Federal Income Tax Consequences

The following discussion summarizes certain federal income tax considerations of awards under the Plan. However, it does not purport to be complete and does not describe the state, local or foreign tax considerations or the consequences for any particular individual

69

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

Stock Options. A participant does not realize ordinary income on the grant of a stock option. Upon exercise of a non-qualified stock option, the participant will realize ordinary income equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares over the option exercise price. The cost basis of the shares of Common Stock acquired for capital gain treatment is their fair market value at the time of exercise. Upon exercise of an incentive stock option, the excess of the fair market value of the shares acquired over the option exercise price will be an item of tax preference to the participant, which may be subject to an alternative minimum tax for the year of exercise. If no disposition of the shares is made within two years from the date of granting of the incentive stock option or within one year after the transfer of the shares to the participant, the participant does not realize taxable income as a result of exercising the incentive stock option; the tax basis of the shares received for capital gain treatment is the option exercise price; any gain or loss realized on the sale of the shares is long-term capital gain or loss. If the participant disposes of the shares within the two-year or one-year periods referred to above, the participant will realize ordinary income at that time in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares at the time of exercise (or the proceeds of disposition, if less) over the option exercise price. For capital gain treatment on such a disposition, the tax basis of the shares will be their fair market value at the time of exercise.

Stock Appreciation Rights. No ordinary income will be realized by a participant in connection with the grant of a SAR. When the SAR is exercised, the participant will realize ordinary income in an amount equal to the sum of the amount of any cash received and the fair market value of the shares of Common Stock or other property received upon the exercise.

Restricted Stock, Performance and Restricted Stock Unit Awards. The participant will not realize ordinary income on the grant of a restricted stock award (or a performance award if the shares of Common Stock are issued on grant), but will realize ordinary income when the shares subject to the award become vested in an amount equal to the excess of (i) the fair market value of the shares on the vesting date over (ii) the purchase price, if any, paid for the shares. The participant may, however, elect under Section 83(b) of the Code to include as ordinary income in the year the shares are granted an amount equal to the excess of (i) the fair market value of the shares on the date of issuance, over (ii) the purchase price, if any, paid for the shares. If the Section 83(b) election is made, the participant will not realize any additional taxable income when the shares become vested.

The participant will not realize ordinary income on the grant of a restricted stock unit award, (or a performance award under which shares of Common Stock are not issued on grant), but will realize ordinary income when the shares subject to the award are issued to the participant after they become vested. The amount of ordinary income will be equal to the excess of (i) the fair market value of the shares on the date they are issued over (ii) the purchase price, if any, paid for the award.

Upon disposition of shares of Common Stock acquired under a restricted stock award, performance award or restricted stock unit award, the participant will realize a capital gain or loss equal to the difference between the selling price and the sum of the amount paid for the shares plus any amount realized as ordinary income upon grant (or vesting) of the shares.

Company Tax Deduction. We generally will be entitled to a tax deduction in connection with an award under the Plan, subject to the provisions of Section 162(m) of the Code, in an amount equal to the ordinary

70

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

income realized by a participant and at the time the participant realizes such income (for example, on the exercise of a nonqualified stock option). Section 162(m) of the Code may limit the deductibility of compensation paid to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and to each of the next three most highly compensated executive officers other than the Chief Financial Officer. Under Section 162(m), the annual compensation paid to any of these executives will be deductible to the extent that it does not exceed $1,000,000 or if the compensation is “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code. Compensation attributable to stock options and SARs under the Plan should qualify as performance-based compensation if the awards are made by the Committee and the exercise or grant price of the award is no less than the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date of grant. Compensation attributable to restricted stock awards, restricted stock unit awards and performance awards should qualify as performance-based compensation if (i) the compensation is approved by the Committee, (ii) the compensation is paid only upon the achievement of an objective performance goal established in writing by the Committee while the outcome is substantially uncertain, and (iii) the Committee certifies in writing prior to the payment of the compensation that the performance goal has been satisfied.

Amendment and Termination. The Plan may be amended or terminated by the Board of Directors except that stockholder approval is required for any amendment to the Plan which increases the number of shares of Common Stock available for awards under the Plan, expands the types of awards available under the Plan, materially expands the class of persons eligible to participate in the Plan, permits the grant of options or stock appreciation rights with an exercise or grant price of less than 100% of fair market value on the date of grant, amends the provisions of the plan prohibiting reductions in the exercise price of SARs or options after the date of grant and prohibiting canceling any option or SAR in exchange for cash or another award, increases the maximum term of options and SARs, increases the limits on shares subject to awards or the dollar value payable with respect to performance awards, or takes any action with respect to an option or SAR that may be treated as a repricing under New York Stock Exchange rules. No amendment or termination may materially impair a participant’s rights under an award previously granted under the Plan without the written consent of the participant.

The Plan will expire on the 10th anniversary of its effective date, except with respect to awards then outstanding, and no further awards may be granted thereafter.

Approval

In order to be approved, the Plan requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the total votes cast on the proposal, provided that the total votes cast on the proposal represent over 50% of all shares entitled to vote on the proposal.

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR ratification of the 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan.

71

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table sets forth aggregated information about the Company’s compensation plans (1991 Key Employee Stock Plan and the 1996 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Plan) under which equity securities of the Company are authorized for issuance as of December 31, 2007:

Number of
securities
remaining available
Number of for future issuance
securities to be under equity
issued upon Weighted-average compensation plans
exercise of exercise price of (excluding
outstanding outstanding securities
options, warrants options, warrants reflected in
and rights and rights column (a))
Plan category (a) (b) (c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders 7,250,458 $ 27.50 3,339,361
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders — — —
Total 7,250,458 $ 27.50 3,339,361

The weighted-average exercise price of $27.50 relates to stock options, stock appreciation right awards, and deferred compensation stock units, which account for 5,863,020 of the 7,250,458 securities issuable upon exercise. The remaining relate to performance contingent restricted stock units and restricted stock unit awards that have no exercise price requirement.

As of December 31, 2007, there were 5,760,460 stock options outstanding with a weighted-average exercise price of $27.42 and a weighted-average term of 4.3 years and 1,301,365 full value shares outstanding under Sonoco’s equity compensation plans. As of December 31, 2007, there were 3,339,361 shares remaining to be awarded under Sonoco’s equity compensation plans.

The number of securities remaining available for future issuance in column (c) above will no longer be available for future grants if the 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan is approved by the shareholders.

72

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has reviewed and discussed with management and our independent auditors, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PWC”), our audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2007. The Audit Committee has discussed with PWC the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended, (AICPA, Professional Standards , Vol. 1. AU Section 380), as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T, and Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Auditing Standard No. 5, (“An Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting That is Integrated with an Audit of Financial Statements”). The Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from PWC required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1, (“ Independence Discussions with Audit Committees ”), as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3600T, and has discussed with PWC such firm’s independence. The Committee has also reviewed the services provided by PWC discussed below, and has considered whether provision of such services is compatible with maintaining auditor independence.

Based on the review and discussions referenced above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

M.D. Oken (Chair), P.L. Davies, C.C. Fort,

J.E. Linville, J.M. Micali, P.R. Rollier

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

PWC served as our principal independent registered public accounting firm for 2007, and the Audit Committee has tentatively selected PWC to serve as our principal independent registered public accounting firm for 2008, pending agreement over the terms of their engagement.

Representatives of PWC will be present and available to answer appropriate questions at the Annual Meeting and may make a statement if they wish.

Fees Relating to Services Provided by PWC for 2007

The following table sets forth a summary of PWC’s fees for professional services rendered in connection with the consolidated financial statements and reports for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 and for other services rendered during 2007 and 2006 on our behalf.

Fee Category ($ in thousands) — Audit Fees 2007 — $ 2,927 71.0 % 2006 — $ 3,410 74.9 %
Audit-related Fees 36 .9 131 2.9
Tax Fees 1,131 27.4 995 21.8
All Other Fees 30 .7 19 .4
Total Fees $ 4,124 100.0 % $ 4,555 100.0 %

73

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

Audit Fees: Audit fees include fees for professional services rendered for the audit of our consolidated financial statements, the review of the interim condensed consolidated financial statements included in quarterly reports and for the services that are normally provided by PWC in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements. (Note that approximately 60% and 50% of the audit fees in 2007 and 2006, respectively, relate to audits outside of the United States with statutory audits performed in 20 countries in 2007 and 2006.) Audit fees also include services provided to us in connection with our compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Approximately $665,000 and $986,000 of the fiscal 2007 and 2006 audit fees relate to Section 404 work.

Audit-related Fees: Audit-related fees include fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our consolidated financial statements and that are not reported under “Audit Fees.” These services include employee benefit plan audits, due-diligence and accounting consultations in connection with acquisitions and divestitures, attest services that are not required by statute or regulation and consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards.

Tax Fees: Tax fees include fees for tax compliance/preparation and other tax services. Tax compliance/preparation includes fees for professional services related to federal, state and international tax compliance, assistance with tax audits and appeals, expatriate tax services and assistance related to the impact of mergers, acquisitions and divestitures on tax return preparation. Other tax services include fees for ongoing assistance with tax consulting and planning.

All Other Fees: All other fees include fees for all other services other than those reported above, primarily seminars and software provided on a subscription basis.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Auditors

The Audit Committee pre-approves all audit and permitted non-audit services (including the fees and terms of such services) provided by the independent auditors, subject to limited exceptions for non-audit services described in Section 10A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which are approved by the Audit Committee prior to completion of the audit. The Committee Chair is empowered to pre-approve PWC services between meetings, provided all such services are brought to the Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting. General pre-approval of certain audit, audit-related and tax services is granted by the Committee at the first quarter Committee meeting. The Committee subsequently reviews fees paid. Specific pre-approval is required for all other services. These projects are reviewed quarterly, and the status of all such services is reviewed with the Committee. During 2007, all audit and permitted non-audit services were pre-approved by the Committee.

RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee has tentatively selected PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to serve as our principal independent registered public accounting firm to examine our financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2008, pending agreement over the terms of their engagement. You will be asked to ratify this selection at the Annual Meeting. PWC, or its predecessors, has audited our books and records for many years.

74

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR the ratification of the selection of PWC as our independent registered public accounting firm for the current year (assuming the Audit Committee and PWC reach an agreement over the terms of their engagement).

INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

Neither the Compensation Committee Report nor the Audit Committee Report shall be deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission or incorporated by reference into any prior or future filings made by the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates such information by reference.

References to our Web site address throughout this Proxy Statement are for information purposes only or to satisfy requirements of the New York Stock Exchange or the Securities and Exchange Commission and are not intended to incorporate our Web site by reference into this Proxy Statement.

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR NEXT ANNUAL MEETING

If you want to present a shareholder proposal to be voted on at our Annual Meeting in 2009, you must submit the proposal to the Secretary of the Company in writing by January 30, 2009. However, if you want us to include your shareholder proposal in our proxy materials for our Annual Meeting in 2009, you must be sure the Secretary of the Company receives your written proposal by November 17, 2008. All shareholder proposals must comply with the requirements of our bylaws. The proxy agents for the Company will use their discretionary authority to vote on any shareholder proposal that the Secretary of the Company does not receive by February 1, 2009.

DELIVERY OF DOCUMENTS TO SHAREHOLDERS SHARING AN ADDRESS

We have begun delivering a single copy of the Annual Report to multiple shareholders sharing one address unless we received contrary instructions from one or more of the shareholders at such address. Upon oral or written request to Sonoco Products Company, c/o Bank of New York Mellon Shareowner Services, 480 Washington Boulevard, Jersey City, NJ 07310-1900 USA, (866) 210-7002, The Bank of New York Mellon will promptly deliver a separate copy of the Annual Report to a shareholder at a shared address to which a single copy was delivered. If you are currently receiving a single copy of the Annual Report for multiple shareholders at your address and would prefer to receive separate copies in the future, please write or call The Bank of New York Mellon at the address or telephone number above and ask them to send you separate copies. If you are still currently receiving multiple copies of the Annual Report for multiple shareholders at your address and would prefer to receive a single copy in the future, please write or call The Bank of New York Mellon at the address or telephone number above, and ask them to send a single copy to your address.

75

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

ELECTRONIC ACCESS TO ANNUAL MEETING MATERIALS

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE SHAREHOLDERS MEETING TO BE HELD ON APRIL 16, 2008

Sonoco’s 2007 Annual Report and 2008 Proxy Statement are available via the Internet at:

http://bnymellon.mobular.net/bnymellon/son

As a shareholder of record, you can elect to receive future Annual Reports and Proxy Statements, as well as quarterly financial and other shareholder information, electronically. Instructions are provided on the voting site if you vote via the Internet. Instructions also are provided if you electronically access your shareholder account, and you are not already receiving your Annual Meeting materials electronically. If you select electronic receipt, you will be notified via email by The Bank of New York Mellon, our transfer agent, as to when the information will be available for your access. Your election to receive information electronically will remain in effect until you notify The Bank of New York Mellon in writing or by telephone at the address or telephone number above that you wish to resume paper delivery by mail of these materials. If you own Sonoco shares through a broker or a bank, please contact that institution regarding instructions about receiving Annual Meeting materials and other financial information electronically.

OTHER MATTERS

As of the date of this Proxy Statement, management does not know of any business that will be presented for consideration at the meeting other than as stated in the notice of the meeting. The proxy agents will vote in their best judgment on any other business that properly comes before the meeting.

To assure your representation at the meeting, please vote by telephone (if you live in the United States or Canada), via the Internet or mark, sign, date and return your proxy card or broker voting instruction form as promptly as possible. Please sign exactly as your name appears on the accompanying proxy.

Charles J. Hupfer Secretary

March 14, 2008

76

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

Exhibit 1

SONOCO PRODUCTS COMPANY 2008 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

Sonoco Products Company (the “Company”), a South Carolina corporation, hereby establishes and adopts the following 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”).

1. PURPOSE OF THE PLAN

The purpose of the Plan is to assist the Company and its Subsidiaries in attracting and retaining selected individuals to serve as employees, directors, consultants and/or advisors of the Company and its Subsidiaries who are expected to contribute to the Company’s success and to achieve long-term objectives which will benefit stockholders of the Company through the additional incentives inherent in the Awards hereunder.

2. DEFINITIONS

| 2.1. | “ Award ” shall mean any Option, Stock
Appreciation Right, Restricted Stock Award, Other Share-Based
Award, Performance Award or any other right, interest or option
relating to Shares or other property (including cash) granted
pursuant to the provisions of the Plan. |
| --- | --- |
| 2.2. | “ Award Agreement ” shall mean any agreement,
contract or other instrument or document evidencing any Award
hereunder, including through an electronic medium. |
| 2.3. | “ Board ” shall mean the Board of Directors of
the Company. |
| 2.4. | “ Code ” shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended from time to time. |
| 2.5. | “ Committee ” shall mean the Executive
Compensation Committee of the Board or a subcommittee thereof
formed by the Executive Compensation Committee to act as the
Committee hereunder. The Committee shall consist of no fewer
than two Directors, each of whom is (i) a
“Non-Employee Director” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act, (ii) an “outside director”
within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code, and
(iii) an “independent director” for purpose of
the rules and regulations of the New York Stock Exchange (or
such other principal securities exchange on which the Shares are
traded). |
| 2.6. | “ Covered Employee ” shall mean an employee of
the Company or its subsidiaries who is a “covered
employee” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the
Code. |
| 2.7. | “ Director ” shall mean a non-employee member of
the Board. |
| 2.8. | “ Dividend Equivalents ” shall have the meaning
set forth in Section 11.5. |
| 2.9. | “ Employee ” shall mean any employee of the
Company or any Subsidiary and any prospective employee
conditioned upon, and effective not earlier than, such person
becoming an employee of the Company or any Subsidiary. Solely
for purposes of the Plan, an Employee shall also mean any
consultant or advisor who is a natural person and who provides
services to the Company or |

77

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

any Subsidiary, so long as such person (i) renders bona fide services that are not in connection with the offer and sale of the Company’s securities in a capital-raising transaction and (ii) does not directly or indirectly promote or maintain a market for the Company’s securities.

| 2.10. | “ Exchange Act ” shall mean the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
| --- | --- |
| 2.11. | “ Fair Market Value ” shall mean, with respect to
any property other than Shares, the market value of such
property determined by such methods or procedures as shall be
established from time to time by the Committee. The Fair Market
Value of Shares as of any date shall be the per Share closing
price of the Shares as reported on the New York Stock Exchange
on that date (or if there were no reported prices on such date,
on the last preceding date on which the prices were reported)
or, if the Company is not then listed on the New York Stock
Exchange, on such other principal securities exchange on which
the Shares are traded, and if the Company is not listed on the
New York Stock Exchange or any other securities exchange, the
Fair Market Value of Shares shall be determined by the Committee
in its sole discretion. |
| 2.12. | “ Limitations ” shall have the meaning set forth
in Section 10.5. |
| 2.13. | “ Option ” shall mean any right granted to a
Participant under the Plan allowing such Participant to purchase
Shares at such price or prices and during such period or periods
as the Committee shall determine. |
| 2.14. | “ Other Share-Based Award ” shall have the
meaning set forth in Section 8.1. |
| 2.15. | “ Participant ” shall mean an Employee or
Director who is approved by the Committee to receive an Award
under the Plan. |
| 2.16. | “ Payee ” shall have the meaning set forth in
Section 12.2. |
| 2.17. | “ Performance Award ” shall mean any Award of
Performance Cash, Performance Shares or Performance Units
granted pursuant to Article 9. |
| 2.18. | “Performance Cash” shall mean any cash
incentives granted pursuant to Article 9 which will be paid
to the Participant upon the achievement of such performance
goals as the Committee shall establish. |
| 2.19. | “ Performance Period ” shall mean the period
established by the Committee of not less than twelve
(12) months and not more than five (5) years during
which any performance goals specified by the Committee with
respect to such Award are to be measured. |
| 2.20. | “ Performance Share ” shall mean any grant
pursuant to Article 9 of a unit valued by reference to a
designated number of Shares, which value will be paid to the
Participant upon achievement of such performance goals as the
Committee shall establish. |
| 2.21. | “ Performance Unit ” shall mean any grant
pursuant to Article 9 of a unit valued by reference to a
designated amount of cash or property other than Shares, which
value will be paid to the Participant upon achievement of such
performance goals during the Performance Period as the Committee
shall establish. |

78

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

| 2.22. | “ Permitted Assignee ” shall have the meaning set
forth in Section 11.3. |
| --- | --- |
| 2.23. | “ Prior Plans ” shall mean, collectively, the
Company’s 1991 Key Employee Stock Plan and the
Company’s 1996 Non-Employee Directors Stock Plan. |
| 2.24. | “ Restricted Stock ” shall mean any Share issued
pursuant to the Plan with the restriction that the holder may
not sell, transfer, pledge or assign such Share and with such
other restrictions as the Committee, in its sole discretion, may
impose (including any restriction on the right to vote such
Share and the right to receive any dividends), which
restrictions may lapse separately or in combination at such time
or times, in installments or otherwise, as the Committee may
deem appropriate. |
| 2.25. | “ Restricted Stock Award ” shall have the meaning
set forth in Section 7.1. |
| 2.26. | “Restricted Stock Unit ” means an Award that is
valued by reference to a Share, which value may be paid to the
Participant by delivery of such property as the Committee shall
determine, including without limitation, cash or Shares, or any
combination thereof, and that has such restrictions as the
Committee, in its sole discretion, may impose, including without
limitation, any restriction on the right to retain such Awards,
to sell, transfer, pledge or assign such Awards, and/or to
receive any cash Dividend Equivalents with respect to such
Awards, which restrictions may lapse separately or in
combination at such time or times, in installments or otherwise,
as the Committee may deem appropriate. |
| 2.27. | “ Restricted Stock Unit Award ” shall have the
meaning set forth in Section 7.1. |
| 2.28. | “ Shares ” shall mean the shares of the
Company’s no par value common stock. |
| 2.29. | “ Stock Appreciation Right ” shall mean the right
granted to a Participant pursuant to Article 6. |
| 2.30. | “ Subsidiary ” shall mean any corporation or
other business entity (other than the Company) in an unbroken
chain of corporations or other business entities beginning with
the Company if, at the relevant time each of the corporations or
other business entities other than the last corporation or other
business entity in the unbroken chain owns stock or other
ownership interests possessing 50% or more of the total combined
voting power of all classes of stock or other ownership
interests in one of the other corporations or other business
entities in the chain. |
| 2.31. | “ Substitute Awards ” shall mean Awards granted
or Shares issued by the Company in assumption of, or in
substitution or exchange for, awards previously granted, or the
right or obligation to make future awards, in each case by a
company acquired by the Company or any Subsidiary or with which
the Company or any Subsidiary combines. |
| 2.32. | “ Vesting Period ” shall have the meaning set
forth in Section 7.1. |

79

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

3. SHARES SUBJECT TO THE PLAN

3.1. Number of Shares.

| (a) | Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 11.2, a total
of 8,500,000 Shares shall be authorized for grant under the
Plan, less one (1) share of Stock for every one
(1) share of Stock that was subject to an option or stock
appreciation right granted after December 31, 2007 from any
of the Prior Plans and two and one-half (2.5) Shares for
every one (1) Share that was subject to an award other than
an option or stock appreciation right granted after
December 31, 2007 under the Prior Plans. Any Shares that
are subject to Awards of Options or Stock Appreciation Rights
shall be counted against this limit as one (1) Share for
every one (1) Share granted. Any Shares that are subject to
Awards other than Options or Stock Appreciation Rights shall be
counted against this limit as two and one-half (2.5) Shares
for every one (1) Share granted. After the effective date
of the Plan (as provided in Section 12.13), no awards may
be granted under any Prior Plan. |
| --- | --- |
| (b) | If (i) any Shares subject to an Award are forfeited or
expire or an Award is settled for cash (in whole or in part), or
(ii) after December 31, 2007 any Shares subject to an
award under the Prior Plan are forfeited or expire or an award
under the Prior Plan is settled for cash (in whole or in part),
the Shares subject to such Award or award under the Prior Plan
shall, to the extent of such forfeiture, expiration or cash
settlement, again be available for Awards under the Plan, in
accordance with Section 3.1(d) below. Notwithstanding
anything to the contrary contained herein, the following Shares
shall not be added to the Shares authorized for grant under
paragraph (a) of this Section: (i) Shares tendered by
the Participant or withheld by the Company in payment of the
purchase price of an Option, (ii) Shares tendered by the
Participant or withheld by the Company to satisfy any tax
withholding obligation with respect to an Award, and
(iii) Shares subject to a Stock Appreciation Right that are
not issued in connection with the stock settlement of the Stock
Appreciation Right on exercise thereof. |
| (c) | Substitute Awards shall not reduce the Shares authorized for
grant under the Plan or authorized for grant to a Participant
under Section 10.5. Additionally, in the event that a
company acquired by the Company or any Subsidiary or with which
the Company or any Subsidiary combines has shares available
under a pre-existing plan approved by stockholders and not
adopted in contemplation of such acquisition or combination, the
shares available for grant pursuant to the terms of such
pre-existing plan (as adjusted, to the extent appropriate, using
the exchange ratio or other adjustment or valuation ratio or
formula used in such acquisition or combination to determine the
consideration payable to the holders of common stock of the
entities party to such acquisition or combination) may be used
for Awards under the Plan and shall not reduce the Shares
authorized for grant under the Plan; provided that Awards using
such available shares shall not be made after the date awards or
grants could have been made under the terms of the pre-existing
plan, absent the acquisition or combination, and shall only be
made to individuals who were not Employees or Directors prior to
such acquisition or combination. |

80

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

(d) Any Shares that again become available for grant pursuant to this Article shall be added back as (i) one (1) Share if such Shares were subject to Options or Stock Appreciation Rights granted under the Plan or options or stock appreciation rights granted under the Prior Plans, and (ii) as two and one-half (2.5) Shares if such Shares were subject to Awards other than Options or Stock Appreciation Rights granted under the Plan or awards other than options or stock appreciation rights granted under the Prior Plans.

3.2. Character of Shares. Any Shares issued hereunder may consist, in whole or in part, of authorized and unissued shares, treasury shares or shares purchased in the open market or otherwise.

4. ELIGIBILITY AND ADMINISTRATION

4.1. Eligibility. Any Employee or Director shall be eligible to be selected as a Participant.

4.2. Administration.

(a) The Plan shall be administered by the Committee. The Committee shall have full power and authority, subject to the provisions of the Plan and subject to such orders or resolutions not inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan as may from time to time be adopted by the Board, to: (i) select the Employees and Directors to whom Awards may from time to time be granted hereunder; (ii) determine the type or types of Awards, not inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan, to be granted to each Participant hereunder; (iii) determine the number of Shares to be covered by each Award granted hereunder; (iv) determine the terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan, of any Award granted hereunder; (v) determine whether, to what extent and under what circumstances Awards may be settled in cash, Shares or other property; (vi) determine whether, to what extent, and under what circumstances cash, Shares, other property and other amounts payable with respect to an Award made under the Plan shall be deferred either automatically or at the election of the Participant; (vii) determine whether, to what extent and under what circumstances any Award shall be canceled or suspended; (viii) interpret and administer the Plan and any instrument or agreement entered into under or in connection with the Plan, including any Award Agreement; (ix) correct any defect, supply any omission or reconcile any inconsistency in the Plan or any Award in the manner and to the extent that the Committee shall deem desirable to carry it into effect; (x) establish such rules and regulations and appoint such agents as it shall deem appropriate for the proper administration of the Plan; (xi) determine whether any Award, other than an Option or Stock Appreciation Right, will have Dividend Equivalents; and (xii) make any other determination and take any other action that the Committee deems necessary or desirable for administration of the Plan.

(b) Decisions of the Committee shall be final, conclusive and binding on all persons or entities, including the Company, any Participant, and any Subsidiary. A majority of the members of the Committee may determine its actions, including fixing the time and place of its

81

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

meetings. Notwithstanding the foregoing any action or determination specifically affecting or relating to an Award to a Director (i) shall be made by the Governance Committee of the Board and (ii) shall be subject to the prior approval of the Board with respect to the type of Award, the number of shares subject to the Award, the exercise price of, or amount payable for, the Award and the vesting conditions for the Award.

(c) To the extent not inconsistent with applicable law, including Section 162(m) of the Code, or the rules and regulations of the New York Stock Exchange (or such other principal securities exchange on which the Shares are traded), the Committee may delegate to (i) committee of one or more directors of the Company any of the authority of the Committee under the Plan, including the right to grant, cancel or suspend Awards and (ii) to the extent permitted by law, to one or more executive officers or a committee of executive officers the right to grant Awards to Employees who are not Directors or executive officers of the Company and the authority to take action on behalf of the Committee pursuant to the Plan to cancel or suspend Awards to Employees who are not Directors or executive officers of the Company.

5. OPTIONS

| 5.1. | Grant of Options. Options may be granted
hereunder to Participants either alone or in addition to other
Awards granted under the Plan. Any Option shall be subject to
the terms and conditions of this Article and to such additional
terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the provisions of
the Plan, as the Committee shall deem desirable. |
| --- | --- |
| 5.2. | Award Agreements. All Options granted pursuant
to this Article shall be evidenced by a written Award Agreement
in such form and containing such terms and conditions as the
Committee shall determine which are not inconsistent with the
provisions of the Plan. The terms of Options need not be the
same with respect to each Participant. Granting an Option
pursuant to the Plan shall impose no obligation on the recipient
to exercise such Option. Any individual who is granted an Option
pursuant to this Article may hold more than one Option granted
pursuant to the Plan at the same time. |
| 5.3. | Option Price. Other than in connection with
Substitute Awards, the option price per each Share purchasable
under any Option granted pursuant to this Article shall not be
less than 100% of the Fair Market Value of one Share on the date
of grant of such Option. Other than pursuant to
Section 11.2, the Committee shall not without the approval
of the Company’s stockholders (a) lower the option
price per Share of an Option after it is granted,
(b) cancel an Option when the option price per Share
exceeds the Fair Market Value of the underlying Shares in
exchange for cash or another Award (other than in connection
with Substitute Awards), and (c) take any other action with
respect to an Option that would be treated as a repricing under
the rules and regulations of the principal securities exchange
on which the Shares are traded. |
| 5.4. | Option Term. The term of each Option shall be
fixed by the Committee in its sole discretion; provided that no
Option shall be exercisable after the expiration of ten
(10) years from the date the Option is granted, except in
the event of death or disability. |

82

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

5.5. Exercise of Options.

(a) Vested Options granted under the Plan shall be exercised by the Participant or by a Permitted Assignee thereof (or by the Participant’s executors, administrators, guardian or legal representative, as may be provided in an Award Agreement) as to all or part of the Shares covered thereby, by giving notice of exercise to the Company or its designated agent, specifying the number of Shares to be purchased. The notice of exercise shall be in such form, made in such manner, and in compliance with such other requirements consistent with the provisions of the Plan as the Committee may prescribe from time to time.

(b) Unless otherwise provided in an Award Agreement, full payment of such purchase price shall be made at the time of exercise and shall be made (i) in cash or cash equivalents (including certified check or bank check or wire transfer of immediately available funds), (ii) by tendering previously acquired Shares (either actually or by attestation, valued at their then Fair Market Value), (iii) with the consent of the Committee, by delivery of other consideration (including, where permitted by law and the Committee, other Awards) having a Fair Market Value on the exercise date equal to the total purchase price, (iv) with the consent of the Committee, by withholding Shares otherwise issuable in connection with the exercise of the Option, (v) through any other method specified in an Award Agreement, or (vi) any combination of any of the foregoing. The notice of exercise, accompanied by such payment, shall be delivered to the Company at its principal business office or such other office as the Committee may from time to time direct, and shall be in such form, containing such further provisions consistent with the provisions of the Plan, as the Committee may from time to time prescribe. In no event may any Option granted hereunder be exercised for a fraction of a Share. No adjustment shall be made for cash dividends or other rights for which the record date is prior to the date of such issuance.

| 5.6. | Form of Settlement. In its sole discretion,
the Committee may provide that the Shares to be issued upon an
Option’s exercise shall be in the form of Restricted Stock
or other similar securities. |
| --- | --- |
| 5.7. | Incentive Stock Options. The Committee may
grant Options intended to qualify as “incentive stock
options” as defined in Section 422 of the Code, to any
employee of the Company or any Subsidiary, subject to the
requirements of Section 422 of the Code. Solely for
purposes of determining whether Shares are available for the
grant of “incentive stock options” under the Plan, the
maximum aggregate number of Shares that may be issued pursuant
to “incentive stock options” granted under the Plan
shall be 8,500,000 Shares, subject to adjustments provided
in Section 11.2. |

6. STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS

6.1. Grant and Exercise. The Committee may provide Stock Appreciation Rights (a) in conjunction with all or part of any Option granted under the Plan or at any subsequent time during the term of such Option, (b) in conjunction with all or part of any Award (other than an Option) granted

83

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

under the Plan or at any subsequent time during the term of such Award, or (c) without regard to any Option or other Award in each case upon such terms and conditions as the Committee may establish in its sole discretion.

6.2. Terms and Conditions. Stock Appreciation Rights shall be subject to such terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan, as shall be determined from time to time by the Committee, including the following:

| (a) | Upon the exercise of a Stock Appreciation Right, the holder
shall have the right to receive the excess of (i) the Fair
Market Value of one (1) Share on the date of exercise (or
such amount less than such Fair Market Value as the Committee
shall so determine at any time during a specified period before
the date of exercise) over (ii) the grant price of the
right on the date of grant, which, except in the case of
Substitute Awards or in connection with an adjustment provided
in Section 11.2, shall not be less than the Fair Market
Value of one (1) Share on such date of grant of the right. |
| --- | --- |
| (b) | Upon the exercise of a Stock Appreciation Right, the Committee
shall determine in its sole discretion whether payment shall be
made in cash, in whole Shares or other property, or any
combination thereof. |
| (c) | The provisions of Stock Appreciation Rights need not be the same
with respect to each recipient. |
| (d) | The Committee may impose such other conditions or restrictions
on the terms of exercise and the grant price of any Stock
Appreciation Right, as it shall deem appropriate. A Stock
Appreciation Right shall have (i) a grant price not less
than Fair Market Value on the date of grant (subject to the
requirements of Section 409A of the Code with respect to a
Stock Appreciation Right granted in conjunction with, but
subsequent to, an Option), and (ii) a term not greater than
ten (10) years except in the event of death or disability. |
| (e) | Without the approval of the Company’s stockholders, other
than pursuant to Section 11.2, the Committee shall not
(i) reduce the grant price of any Stock Appreciation Right
after the date of grant (ii) cancel any Stock Appreciation
Right when the grant price per Share exceeds the Fair Market
Value of the underlying Shares in exchange for cash or another
Award (other than in connection with Substitute Awards), and
(iii) take any other action with respect to a Stock
Appreciation Right that would be treated as a repricing under
the rules and regulations of the principal securities market on
which the Shares are traded. |
| (f) | The Committee may impose such terms and conditions on Stock
Appreciation Rights granted in conjunction with any Award (other
than an Option) as the Committee shall determine in its sole
discretion. |

7. RESTRICTED STOCK AND RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS

7.1. Grants. Awards of Restricted Stock and of Restricted Stock Units may be issued hereunder to Participants either alone or in addition to other Awards granted under the Plan (a “Restricted

84

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

Stock Award” or “Restricted Stock Unit Award” respectively), and such Restricted Stock Awards and Restricted Stock Unit Awards shall also be available as a form of payment of Performance Awards and other earned cash-based incentive compensation. A Restricted Stock Award or Restricted Stock Unit Award shall be subject to vesting restrictions imposed by the Committee covering a period of time specified by the Committee (the “Vesting Period”). The Committee has absolute discretion to determine whether any consideration (other than services) is to be received by the Company or any Subsidiary as a condition precedent to the issuance of Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units.

| 7.2. | Award Agreements. The terms of any Restricted
Stock Award or Restricted Stock Unit Award granted under the
Plan shall be set forth in a written Award Agreement which shall
contain provisions determined by the Committee and not
inconsistent with the Plan. The terms of Restricted Stock Awards
and Restricted Stock Unit Awards need not be the same with
respect to each Participant. |
| --- | --- |
| 7.3. | Rights of Holders of Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock
Units. Unless otherwise provided in the Award
Agreement, beginning on the date of grant of the Restricted
Stock Award and subject to execution of the Award Agreement, the
Participant shall become a stockholder of the Company with
respect to all Shares subject to the Award Agreement and shall
have all of the rights of a stockholder, including the right to
vote such Shares and the right to receive distributions made
with respect to such Shares. A Participant receiving a
Restricted Stock Unit Award shall not possess voting rights with
respect to such Award. Except as otherwise provided in an Award
Agreement, any Shares or any other property (other than cash)
distributed as a dividend or otherwise with respect to any
Restricted Stock Award or Restricted Stock Unit Award as to
which the restrictions have not yet lapsed shall be subject to
the same restrictions as such Restricted Stock Award or
Restricted Stock Unit Award. |
| 7.4. | Minimum Vesting Period. Except for Substitute
Awards and for certain limited situations (including the death,
disability or retirement of the Participant or a change in
control), or special circumstances determined by the Committee,
such as the achievement of performance objectives (which shall
have a minimum Vesting Period of one (1) year), Restricted
Stock Awards and Restricted Stock Unit Awards subject solely to
the continued employment of employees of the Company or a
Subsidiary shall have a Vesting Period of not less than three
(3) years from date of grant (but permitting pro rata
vesting over such time); provided that such minimum Vesting
Period shall be one (1) year for (i) grants to new
hires to replace forfeited awards from a prior employer, or
(ii) grants of Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units
in payment of Performance Awards and other earned cash-based
incentive compensation. Subject to the foregoing minimum Vesting
Period requirements, the Committee may, in its sole discretion
and subject to the limitations imposed under Section 162(m)
of the Code and the regulations thereunder in the case of a
Restricted Stock Award intended to comply with the
performance-based exception under Code Section 162(m),
waive the forfeiture period and any other conditions set forth
in any Award Agreement subject to such terms and conditions as
the Committee shall deem appropriate. The minimum Vesting Period
requirements of this Section shall not apply to Restricted Stock
Awards |

85

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

or Restricted Stock Unit Awards granted to Directors or any consultant or advisor who provides services to the Company or a Subsidiary.

7.5. Issuance of Shares. Any Restricted Stock granted under the Plan may be evidenced in such manner as the Board may deem appropriate, including book-entry registration or issuance of a stock certificate or certificates, which certificate or certificates shall be held by the Company. Such certificate or certificates shall be registered in the name of the Participant and shall bear an appropriate legend referring to the restrictions applicable to such Restricted Stock.

8. OTHER SHARE-BASED AWARDS

| 8.1. | Grants. Other Awards of Shares and other
Awards that are valued in whole or in part by reference to, or
are otherwise based on, Shares or other property (“Other
Share-Based Awards”) may be granted hereunder to
Participants either alone or in addition to other Awards granted
under the Plan. Other Share-Based Awards shall also be available
as a form of payment of other Awards granted under the Plan and
other earned cash-based compensation. |
| --- | --- |
| 8.2. | Award Agreements. The terms of Other
Share-Based Awards granted under the Plan shall be set forth in
a written Award Agreement which shall contain provisions
determined by the Committee and not inconsistent with the Plan.
The terms of such Awards need not be the same with respect to
each Participant. |
| 8.3. | Minimum Vesting Period. Except for Substitute
Awards and for certain limited situations (including the death,
disability or retirement of the Participant or a change in
control), or special circumstances determined by the Committee,
such as the achievement of performance objectives (which shall
have a minimum Vesting Period of one (1) year), Other
Share-Based Awards subject solely to the continued employment of
employees of the Company or a Subsidiary shall have a Vesting
Period of not less than three (3) years from date of grant
(but permitting pro rata vesting over such time); provided that
the minimum Vesting Period shall be one (1) year for
(i) grants to new hires to replace forfeited awards from a
prior employer, or (ii) grants of Other Share-Based Awards
in payment of Performance Awards and other earned cash-based
incentive compensation. Subject to the foregoing minimum Vesting
Period requirements, the Committee may, in its sole discretion
and subject to the limitations imposed under Section 162(m)
of the Code and the regulations thereunder in the case of an
Other Share-Based Award intended to comply with the
performance-based exception under Code Section 162(m),
waive the forfeiture period and any other conditions set forth
in any Award Agreement subject to such terms and conditions as
the Committee shall deem appropriate. The minimum Vesting Period
requirements of this Section shall not apply to Other
Share-Based Awards granted to Directors or any consultant or
advisor who provides services to the Company or a Subsidiary. |
| 8.4. | Payment. Except as may be provided in an Award
Agreement, Other Share-Based Awards may be paid in cash, Shares,
other property, or any combination thereof, in the sole
discretion of the Committee. Other Share-Based Awards may be
paid in a lump sum or in installments or, in |

86

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

accordance with procedures established by the Committee, on a deferred basis subject to the requirements of Section 409A of the Code.

9. PERFORMANCE AWARDS

| 9.1. | Grants. Performance Awards in the form of
Performance Cash, Performance Shares or Performance Units, as
determined by the Committee in its sole discretion, may be
granted hereunder to Participants, for no consideration or for
such minimum consideration as may be required by applicable law,
either alone or in addition to other Awards granted under the
Plan. The performance goals to be achieved for each Performance
Period shall be conclusively determined by the Committee and may
be based upon the criteria set forth in Section 10.2. |
| --- | --- |
| 9.2. | Award Agreements. The terms of any Performance
Award granted under the Plan shall be set forth in a written
Award Agreement which shall contain provisions determined by the
Committee and not inconsistent with the Plan, including whether
such Awards shall have Dividend Equivalents. The terms of
Performance Awards need not be the same with respect to each
Participant. |
| 9.3. | Terms and Conditions. The performance criteria
to be achieved during any Performance Period and the length of
the Performance Period shall be determined by the Committee upon
the grant of each Performance Award; provided, however, that a
Performance Period shall not be shorter than 12 months nor
longer than five years. The amount of the Award to be
distributed shall be conclusively determined by the Committee. |
| 9.4. | Payment. Except as may be provided in an Award
Agreement, Performance Awards will be distributed only after the
end of the relevant Performance Period. Performance Awards may
be paid in cash, Shares, other property, or any combination
thereof, in the sole discretion of the Committee. Performance
Awards may be paid in a lump sum or in installments following
the close of the Performance Period or, in accordance with
procedures established by the Committee, on a deferred basis
subject to the requirements of Section 409A of the Code. |

10. CODE SECTION 162(m) PROVISIONS

| 10.1. | Covered Employees. Notwithstanding any other
provision of the Plan, if the Committee determines at the time a
Restricted Stock Award, a Restricted Stock Unit Award, a
Performance Award or an Other Share-Based Award is granted to a
Participant who is, or is likely to be, as of the end of the tax
year in which the Company would claim a tax deduction in
connection with such Award, a Covered Employee, then the
Committee may provide that this Article 10 is applicable to
such Award. |
| --- | --- |
| 10.2. | Performance Criteria. If the Committee
determines that a Restricted Stock Award, a Restricted Stock
Unit, a Performance Award or an Other Share-Based Award is
intended to be subject to this Article 10, the lapsing of
restrictions thereon and the distribution of cash, Shares or
other property pursuant thereto, as applicable, shall be subject
to the achievement of one or more objective performance goals
established by the Committee, which shall be based on the |

87

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

attainment of specified levels of one or any combination of the following: net sales; revenue; revenue growth or product revenue growth; operating income (before or after taxes); pre-tax or after-tax income (before or after allocation of corporate overhead and bonus); net earnings; earnings per share; net income (before or after taxes); return on equity; total shareholder return; return on assets or net assets; appreciation in and/or maintenance of the price of the Shares or any other publicly-traded securities of the Company; market share; gross profits; earnings (including earnings before taxes, earnings before interest and taxes or earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization); economic value-added models or equivalent metrics; comparisons with various stock market indices; reductions in costs; cash flow or cash flow per share (before or after dividends); return on capital (including return on total capital or return on invested capital); cash flow return on investment; improvement in or attainment of expense levels or working capital levels (based on cash or days); operating margins, gross margins or cash margin; year-end cash; debt reductions; stockholder equity; market share; regulatory achievements; and implementation, completion or attainment of measurable objectives with respect to research, development, products or projects, production volume levels, acquisitions and divestitures and recruiting and maintaining personnel. Such performance goals also may be based solely by reference to the Company’s performance or the performance of a Subsidiary, division, business segment or business unit of the Company, or based upon the relative performance of other companies or upon comparisons of any of the indicators of performance relative to other companies. The Committee may also exclude charges related to an event or occurrence which the Committee determines should appropriately be excluded, including (a) restructurings, discontinued operations, extraordinary items, and other unusual or non-recurring charges, (b) an event either not directly related to the operations of the Company or not within the reasonable control of the Company’s management, or (c) the cumulative effects of tax or accounting changes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Such performance goals shall be set by the Committee within the time period prescribed by, and shall otherwise comply with the requirements of, Section 162(m) of the Code, and the regulations thereunder.

| 10.3. | Adjustments. Notwithstanding any provision of
the Plan, with respect to any Restricted Stock Award, Restricted
Stock Unit Award, Performance Award or Other Share-Based Award
that is subject to this Section 10, the Committee may
adjust downwards, but not upwards, the amount payable pursuant
to such Award, and the Committee may not waive the achievement
of the applicable performance goals, except in the case of the
death or disability of the Participant or as otherwise
determined by the Committee in special circumstances. |
| --- | --- |
| 10.4. | Restrictions. The Committee shall have the
power to impose such other restrictions on Awards subject to
this Article as it may deem necessary or appropriate to ensure
that such Awards satisfy all requirements for
“performance-based compensation” within the meaning of
Section 162(m) of the Code. |
| 10.5. | Limitations on Grants to Individual
Participants. Subject to adjustment as provided
in Section 11.2, no Participant may be granted
(i) Options or Stock Appreciation Rights during any 36-month period with respect to more than 2,000,000 Shares or
(ii) earn more than |

88

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

500,000 Shares under Restricted Stock Awards, Restricted Stock Unit Awards, Performance Awards and/or Other Share-Based Awards in any 36-month period that are intended to comply with the performance-based exception under Code Section 162(m) and are denominated in Shares (collectively, the “Limitations”). In addition to the foregoing, the maximum dollar value that may be earned by any Participant in any 12-month period with respect to Performance Awards that are intended to comply with the performance-based exception under Code Section 162(m) and are denominated in cash is $5,000,000. If an Award is canceled, the canceled Award shall continue to be counted toward the applicable Limitations.

11. GENERALLY APPLICABLE PROVISIONS

| 11.1. | Amendment and Termination of the Plan. The
Board may, from time to time, alter, amend, suspend or terminate
the Plan as it shall deem advisable, subject to any requirement
for stockholder approval imposed by applicable law, including
the rules and regulations of the principal securities market on
which the Shares are traded; provided that the Board may not
amend the Plan in any manner that would result in noncompliance
with Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act; and further provided that the Board may
not, without the approval of the Company’s stockholders,
amend the Plan to (a) increase the number of Shares that
may be the subject of Awards under the Plan (except for
adjustments pursuant to Section 11.2), (b) expand the
types of awards available under the Plan, (c) materially
expand the class of persons eligible to participate in the Plan,
(d) amend any provision of Section 5.3 or
Section 6.2(e), (e) increase the maximum permissible
term of any Option specified by Section 5.4 or the maximum
permissible term of a Stock Appreciation Right specified by
Section 6.2(d), or (f) increase the limitations set forth
in Section 10.5. The Board may not, without the approval of
the Company’s stockholders, take any other action with
respect to an Option or Stock Appreciation Right that would be
treated as a repricing under the rules and regulations of the
principal securities exchange on which the Shares are traded,
including a reduction of the exercise price of an Option or the
grant price of a Stock Appreciation Right or the exchange of an
Option or Stock Appreciation Right for cash or another Award. In
addition, no amendments to, or termination of, the Plan shall in
any way materially impair the rights of a Participant under any
Award previously granted without such Participant’s consent. |
| --- | --- |
| 11.2. | Adjustments. In the event of any merger,
reorganization, consolidation, recapitalization, dividend or
distribution (whether in cash, shares or other property, other
than a regular cash dividend), stock split, reverse stock split,
spin-off or similar transaction or other change in corporate
structure affecting the Shares or the value thereof, such
adjustments and other substitutions shall be made to the Plan
and to Awards as the Committee deems equitable or appropriate
taking into consideration the accounting and tax consequences,
including such adjustments in the aggregate number, class and
kind of securities that may be delivered under the Plan, the
Limitations, the maximum number of Shares that may be issued as
incentive stock options and, in the aggregate or to any one
Participant, in the number, class, kind and option or exercise
price of securities subject to outstanding Awards granted under
the Plan (including, if the Committee deems appropriate, the
substitution of similar options to purchase the shares of, or |

89

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

other awards denominated in the shares of, another company) as the Committee may determine to be appropriate; provided, however, that the number of Shares subject to any Award shall always be a whole number.

| 11.3. | Transferability of Awards. Except as provided
below, no Award and no Shares subject to Awards described in
Article 8 that have not been issued or as to which any
applicable restriction, performance or deferral period has not
lapsed, may be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise
encumbered, other than by will or the laws of descent and
distribution, and such Award may be exercised during the life of
the Participant only by the Participant or the
Participant’s guardian or legal representative. To the
extent and under such terms and conditions as determined by the
Committee, a Participant may assign or transfer an Award (each
transferee thereof, a “Permitted Assignee”) to
(i) the Participant’s spouse, children or
grandchildren (including any adopted and step children or
grandchildren), parents, grandparents or siblings, (ii) to
a trust for the benefit of one or more of the Participant or the
Persons referred to in clause (i), (iii) to a partnership,
limited liability company or corporation in which the
participant or the Persons referred to in clause (i) are
the only partners, members or shareholders or (iv) for
charitable donations; provided that such Permitted Assignee
shall be bound by and subject to all of the terms and conditions
of the Plan and the Award Agreement relating to the transferred
Award and shall execute an agreement satisfactory to the Company
evidencing such obligations; and provided further that such
Participant shall remain bound by the terms and conditions of
the Plan. The Company shall cooperate with any Permitted
Assignee and the Company’s transfer agent in effectuating
any transfer permitted under this Section. |
| --- | --- |
| 11.4. | Termination of Employment. The Committee shall
determine and set forth in each Award Agreement whether any
Awards granted in such Award Agreement will continue to be
exercisable, and the terms of such exercise, on and after the
date that a Participant ceases to be employed by or to provide
services to the Company or any Subsidiary (including as a
Director), whether by reason of death, disability, voluntary or
involuntary termination of employment or services, or otherwise.
The date of termination of a Participant’s employment or
services will be determined by the Committee, which
determination will be final. |
| 11.5. | Deferral ; Dividend Equivalents. The
Committee shall be authorized to establish procedures pursuant
to which the payment of any Award may be deferred. Subject to
the provisions of the Plan and any Award Agreement, the
recipient of an Award (including any deferred Award) other than
an Option or Stock Appreciation Right may, if so determined by
the Committee, be entitled to receive, currently or on a
deferred basis, cash, stock or other property dividends, or cash
payments in amounts equivalent to cash, stock or other property
dividends on Shares (“Dividend Equivalents”) with
respect to the number of Shares covered by the Award, as
determined by the Committee, in its sole discretion. The
Committee may provide that such amounts and Dividend Equivalents
(if any) shall be deemed to have been reinvested in additional
Shares or otherwise reinvested and may provide that such amounts
and Dividend Equivalents are subject to the same vesting or
performance conditions as the underlying Award. |

90

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

12. MISCELLANEOUS

| 12.1. | Award Agreements. Each Award Agreement shall
either be (a) in writing in a form approved by the
Committee and executed by the Company by an officer duly
authorized to act on its behalf, or (b) an electronic
notice in a form approved by the Committee and recorded by the
Company (or its designee) in an electronic recordkeeping system
used for the purpose of tracking one or more types of Awards as
the Committee may provide; in each case and if required by the
Committee, the Award Agreement shall be executed or otherwise
electronically accepted by the recipient of the Award in such
form and manner as the Committee may require. The Committee may
authorize any officer of the Company to execute any or all Award
Agreements on behalf of the Company. The Award Agreement shall
set forth the material terms and conditions of the Award as
established by the Committee consistent with the provisions of
the Plan. |
| --- | --- |
| 12.2. | Tax Withholding. The Company shall have the
right to make all payments or distributions pursuant to the Plan
to a Participant (or a Permitted Assignee thereof) (any such
person, a “Payee”) net of any applicable federal,
state and local taxes required to be paid or withheld as a
result of (a) the grant of any Award, (b) the exercise
of an Option or Stock Appreciation Right, (c) the delivery
of Shares or cash, (d) the lapse of any restrictions in
connection with any Award or (e) any other event occurring
pursuant to the Plan. The Company or any Subsidiary shall have
the right to withhold from wages or other amounts otherwise
payable to such Payee such withholding taxes as may be required
by law, or to otherwise require the Payee to pay such
withholding taxes. If the Payee shall fail to make such tax
payments as are required, the Company or its Subsidiaries shall,
to the extent permitted by law, have the right to deduct any
such taxes from any payment of any kind otherwise due to such
Payee or to take such other action as may be necessary to
satisfy such withholding obligations. The Committee shall be
authorized to establish procedures for election by Participants
to satisfy such obligation for the payment of such taxes by
tendering previously acquired Shares (either actually or by
attestation, valued at their then Fair Market Value), or by
directing the Company to retain Shares (up to the
Participant’s minimum required tax withholding rate or such
other rate that will not trigger a negative accounting impact)
otherwise deliverable in connection with the Award. |
| 12.3. | Right of Discharge Reserved; Claims to
Awards. Nothing in the Plan nor the grant of an
Award hereunder shall confer upon any Employee or Director the
right to continue in the employment or service of the Company or
any Subsidiary or affect any right that the Company or any
Subsidiary may have to terminate the employment or service of
(or to demote or to exclude from future Awards under the Plan)
any such Employee or Director at any time for any reason. Except
as specifically provided by the Committee, the Company shall not
be liable for the loss of existing or potential profit from an
Award granted in the event of termination of an employment or
other relationship. No Employee or Participant shall have any
claim to be granted any Award under the Plan, and there is no
obligation for uniformity of treatment of Employees or
Participants under the Plan. |
| 12.4. | Substitute Awards. Notwithstanding any other
provision of the Plan, the terms of Substitute Awards may vary
from the terms set forth in the Plan to the extent the Committee
deems |

91

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

appropriate to conform, in whole or in part, to the provisions of the awards in substitution for which they are granted.

| 12.5. | Cancellation of Award. Notwithstanding
anything to the contrary contained herein, an Award Agreement
may provide that the Award shall be canceled if the Participant,
without the consent of the Company, while employed by the
Company or any Subsidiary or after termination of such
employment or service, establishes a relationship with a
competitor of the Company or any Subsidiary or engages in
activity that is in conflict with or adverse to the interest of
the Company or any Subsidiary, as determined by the Committee in
its sole discretion. The Committee may provide in an Award
Agreement that if within the time period specified in the
Agreement the Participant establishes a relationship with a
competitor or engages in an activity referred to in the
preceding sentence, the Participant will forfeit any gain
realized on the vesting or exercise of the Award and must repay
such gain to the Company. |
| --- | --- |
| 12.6. | Stop Transfer Orders. All certificates for
Shares delivered under the Plan pursuant to any Award shall be
subject to such stop-transfer orders and other restrictions as
the Committee may deem advisable under the rules, regulations
and other requirements of the Securities and Exchange
Commission, any stock exchange upon which the Shares are then
listed, and any applicable federal or state securities law, and
the Committee may cause a legend or legends to be put on any
such certificates to make appropriate reference to such
restrictions. |
| 12.7. | Nature of Payments. All Awards made pursuant
to the Plan are in consideration of services performed or to be
performed for the Company or any Subsidiary, division or
business unit of the Company. Any income or gain realized
pursuant to Awards under the Plan constitute a special incentive
payment to the Participant and shall not be taken into account,
to the extent permissible under applicable law, as compensation
for purposes of any of the employee benefit plans of the Company
or any Subsidiary except as may be determined by the Committee
or by the Board or Board of Directors of the applicable
Subsidiary. |
| 12.8. | Other Plans. Nothing contained in the Plan
shall prevent the Board from adopting other or additional
compensation arrangements, subject to stockholder approval if
such approval is required; and such arrangements may be either
generally applicable or applicable only in specific cases. |
| 12.9. | Severability. If any provision of the Plan
shall be held unlawful or otherwise invalid or unenforceable in
whole or in part by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
provision shall (a) be deemed limited to the extent that
such court of competent jurisdiction deems it lawful, valid and/or enforceable and as so limited shall remain in full force and
effect, and (b) not affect any other provision of the Plan
or part thereof, each of which shall remain in full force and
effect. If the making of any payment or the provision of any
other benefit required under the Plan shall be held unlawful or
otherwise invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent
jurisdiction, such unlawfulness, invalidity or unenforceability
shall not prevent any other payment or benefit from being made
or provided under the Plan, and if the making of any payment in
full or the provision of any other benefit required under the
Plan in full would be unlawful or otherwise invalid or |

92

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

unenforceable, then such unlawfulness, invalidity or unenforceability shall not prevent such payment or benefit from being made or provided in part, to the extent that it would not be unlawful, invalid or unenforceable, and the maximum payment or benefit that would not be unlawful, invalid or unenforceable shall be made or provided under the Plan.

| 12.10. | Construction. As used in the Plan, the words
“ include ” and “ including ,” and
variations thereof, shall not be deemed to be terms of
limitation, but rather shall be deemed to be followed by the
words “ without limitation .” |
| --- | --- |
| 12.11. | Unfunded Status of the Plan. The Plan is
intended to constitute an “unfunded” plan for
incentive compensation. With respect to any payments not yet
made to a Participant by the Company, nothing contained herein
shall give any such Participant any rights that are greater than
those of a general creditor of the Company. In its sole
discretion, the Committee may authorize the creation of trusts
or other arrangements to meet the obligations created under the
Plan to deliver the Shares or payments in lieu of or with
respect to Awards hereunder; provided, however, that the
existence of such trusts or other arrangements is consistent
with the unfunded status of the Plan. |
| 12.12. | Governing Law. The Plan and all determinations
made and actions taken thereunder, to the extent not otherwise
governed by the Code or the laws of the United States, shall be
governed by the laws of the State of South Carolina, without
reference to principles of conflict of laws, and construed
accordingly. |
| 12.13. | Effective Date of Plan; Termination of
Plan. The Plan shall be effective on the date of
the approval of the Plan by the holders of the shares entitled
to vote at a duly constituted meeting of the stockholders of the
Company. The Plan shall be null and void and of no effect if the
foregoing condition is not fulfilled and in such event each
Award shall, notwithstanding any of the preceding provisions of
the Plan, be null and void and of no effect. Awards may be
granted under the Plan at any time and from time to time on or
prior to the tenth anniversary of the effective date of the
Plan, on which date the Plan will terminate except as to Awards
then outstanding under the Plan. Such outstanding Awards shall
remain in effect until they have been exercised or terminated,
or have expired. |
| 12.14. | Foreign Employees. Awards may be granted to
Participants who are foreign nationals or employed outside the
United States, or both, on such terms and conditions different
from those applicable to Awards to Employees employed in the
United States as may, in the judgment of the Committee, be
necessary or desirable in order to recognize differences in
local law or tax policy. The Committee also may impose
conditions on the exercise or vesting of Awards in order to
minimize the Company’s obligation with respect to tax
equalization for Employees on assignments outside their home
country. |
| 12.15. | Compliance with Section 409A of the
Code. This Plan is intended to comply and shall
be administered in a manner that is intended to comply with
Section 409A of the Code and shall be construed and
interpreted in accordance with such intent. To the extent that
an Award or the payment, settlement or deferral thereof is
subject to Section 409A of the Code, the Award shall |

93

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

BEGIN PAGE WIDTH

be granted, paid, settled or deferred in a manner that will comply with Section 409A of the Code, including regulations or other guidance issued with respect thereto, except as otherwise determined by the Committee. Any provision of this Plan that would cause the grant of an Award or the payment, settlement or deferral thereof to fail to satisfy Section 409A of the Code shall be amended to comply with Section 409A of the Code on a timely basis, which may be made on a retroactive basis, in accordance with regulations and other guidance issued under Section 409A of the Code.

12.16. Captions. The captions in the Plan are for convenience of reference only, and are not intended to narrow, limit or affect the substance or interpretation of the provisions contained herein.

94

END PAGE WIDTH PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

FOLD AND DETACH HEREAddress Change/Comments (Mark the corresponding box on the reverse side) PROXYTHIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF SONOCO PRODUCTS COMPANY 1 NORTH SECOND STREET — HARTSVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA 29550 — USA The undersigned hereby appoints Charles J. Hupfer, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary, or Ritchie L. Bond, Staff Vice President and Treasurer, as proxy agent, each with the power to appoint his substitute, and hereby authorizes him to represent and to vote, as designated below, all the shares of Common Stock of Sonoco Products Company held of record by the undersigned on February 22, 2008 at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 16, 2008, or at any adjournment thereof. THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED HEREIN BY THE UNDERSIGNED SHAREHOLDER. IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR ALL NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR, TO APPROVE THE 2008 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN, AND TO RATIFY THE SELECTION OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM. This card also constitutes voting instructions to the plan Trustee for shares of Sonoco Products Company held in the Sonoco Products Company Savings Plan. You may direct the Trustee how to vote your shares as indicated on this card. If you fail to give voting instructions to the Trustee, your shares will be voted by the Trustee in the same proportion as the shares for which valid instructions have been received. (Continued, and to be marked, dated and signed, on the other side) You can view the Annual Report and Proxy Statement on the internet at http://bnymellon.mobular.net/bnymellon/sonTHE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR ITEMS 1, 2 AND 3. Mark Here for Address Change or CommentsSignature Signature DatePlease sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When shares are held by joint tenants, both should sign. When signing as an attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give your full title as such. If a corporation, please sign in full corporate name by president or other authorized officer. If a partnership, please sign in partnership name by an authorized person. 1. To elect a board of directors. Nominees: Three-Year Term: 01 C. J. Bradshaw 02 J. L. Coker 03 L. W. Newton 04 M. D. Oken Two-Year Term: 05 P. R. Rollier (Instructions: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee, mark the “Exceptions” box and write that nominee’s name on the following blank line.) 2. To approve the 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan 3. To ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for the Company. FOLD AND DETACH HERE

Folio /Folio

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

PLEASE SEE REVERSE SIDEWE ENCOURAGE YOU TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF INTERNET OR TELEPHONE VOTING, BOTH ARE AVAILABLE 24 HOURS A DAY, 7 DAYS A WEEK. Your Internet or telephone vote authorizes the named proxies to vote your shares in the same manner as if you marked, signed and returned your proxy card. Internet and telephone voting is available through 11:59 PM Eastern Time the day prior to annual meeting day. If you vote your proxy by Internet or by telephone, you do NOT need to mail back your proxy card. To vote by mail, mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the enclosed postage-paid envelope. INTERNET http://www.eproxy.com/sonUse the Internet to vote your proxy. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the Web site. TELEPHONE 1-866-580-9477 Use any touch-tone telephone to vote your proxy. Have your proxy card in hand when you call. ORChoose MLinkSM for fast, easy and secure 24/7 online access to your future proxy materials, investment plan statements, tax documents and more. Simply log on to Investor ServiceDirect at www.bnymellon.com/shareowner/isd where step-by-step instructions will prompt you through enrollment. FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN FOR ALL WITHHOLD FOR ALL EXCEPTIONS EXCEPTIONS

Folio /Folio