Regulatory Filings • Sep 23, 2025
Regulatory Filings
Open in ViewerOpens in native device viewer
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jddst

Aina Kristin Pham a,b,\* , Marianne Hiorth a , Pål Rongved a,c
a Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Sem Saelands vei 3, 0371 Oslo, Norway
b SoftOx Solutions AS, Martin Linges vei 25, 1364 Fornebu, Norway
c Adjutec Pharma AS, Ullernchausseen 64, 0379 Oslo, Norway
Keywords: Hypochlorous acid Calcium hypochlorite Acetic acid Stability High-grade bleaching powder
Hypochlorous acid (HOCl) has been strongly recognized in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. It is a wellknown antimicrobial compound with a broad-spectrum effect that demonstrates excellent clinical safety results in wounds. However, stable HOCl products remain unavailable due to challenges in maintaining storage stability, particularly at higher concentrations (≥200 μg g− 1 ) at room temperature. To address this limitation, we investigated calcium hypochlorite (Ca[OCl]2) as a stable solid precursor for in-situ HOCl generation. This paper presents comprehensive preformulation characterization data, including powder stability analysis and release kinetics, establishing the foundational parameters necessary for future product development. We have demonstrated that commercial Ca(OCl)2 granules dissolves in a buffered medium and converts to HOCl at the time of use. However, the granules convert too slowly and may jeopardize user-friendliness. Through a mixed multivariate experimental design, we found that grinding the granules into a powder (particle sizes between 45 and 500 μm) significantly improved the conversion rates, achieving ≥99.4 % conversion within 10 s of shaking in acetic acid buffer pH 4.3 for samples equivalent to 2000 μg g− 1 HOCl. Particles sized 125–150 and 180–250 μm showed rapid dissolution, with ≥98.4 % conversion within just 1 s of shaking. Powdered Ca(OCl)2 was stable for at least 24 months at 23 ◦C ± 2 when stored dry (≤5 % degradation), though higher temperatures and moisture negatively affected the storage stability. Flow behavior of powdered Ca(OCl)2 was also studied by the angle of repose, Hausner's ratio and compressibility index for future production purposes of the novel formulation. Good flow was observed for powders above 250 μm in particle size, whereas the tests failed for particle size below 150 μm. In summary, these findings demonstrate that powdered Ca(OCl)2 is highly stable under the proper storage conditions, making it a promising and novel HOCl precursor formulation for combating bacterial biofilm and other topical microbial infections.
There is a global need for effective and safe antimicrobial and biofilm-eradicating formulations due to the spread of antimicrobial resistance [1,2]. Literature indicates growing evidence of bacterial biofilm being present in non-healing wounds and their adverse role in delaying normal wound healing [3]. The biofilm barrier reduces antibiotic susceptibility by limiting antibiotic access to bacterial cells and protecting the microbial community from the host immune response. Consequently, bacterial biofilms are 100–1000 times more tolerant to antibiotics compared to planktonic cells [4]. Biofilm formation also
poses challenges in other healthcare areas, such as medical devices and dental health, and in industrial settings such as fish tanks, water treatment systems, and food processing equipment [5,6].
Hypochlorous acid (HOCl) has been strongly recognized in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic in its role as one of the human body's first line of defense against invading pathogens. This has created an exceptional opportunity in the field of infection control. The use of HOCl is not new and has been extensively documented and reviewed in literature. The first form of HOCl was produced over 200 years ago in France as potassium hypochlorite, a liquid chlorine solution [7]. It has therefore been extensively documented as a promising compound in the fight
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2025.107292
Received 13 February 2025; Received in revised form 14 July 2025; Accepted 16 July 2025 Available online 17 July 2025
1773-2247/© 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
* Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected] (A.K. Pham).
against microbial infections [8–11]. In more recent literature, Fazli et al. [12] and Burian et al. [13,14] have demonstrated that combining HOCl and acetic acid (HOCl + HOAc) yields promising clinical results in the treatment of acute and biofilm-infected chronic wounds.
Produced naturally in humans by the enzyme myeloperoxidase, HOCl is mainly expressed in neutrophils and, to a lesser degree, in monocytes as a first line of defense against invading pathogens via oxidative stress [15–19]. It is a highly reactive and non-toxic oxidizer at low concentrations [20]. The efficacy of HOCl is influenced by contact time, concentration and pH value of the solution [19,21–24]. Its decomposition will therefore result in a loss of antimicrobial activity [25]. Ready-to-use HOCl aqueous solutions, such as electrolyzed water, face long-term stability issues due to the compound's propensity for oxidation reactions [15,23,26]. This instability poses pharmaceutical development challenges, including accelerated degradation in non-buffered systems and under ultraviolet light or elevated temperature. The degradation rate of HOCl is concentration-dependent and occurs more rapidly at higher concentrations as well [8]. Additionally, organic compounds (e.g., proteins and carbohydrates) and inorganic metal ions (e.g., ferrous iron and copper ions) readily consume HOCl through oxidation reactions [27–31]. On-site equipment for producing HOCl solutions addresses the stability issue; however, such apparatuses can be impractical for deployment in certain contexts, such as on a battlefield.
Currently available ready-to-use HOCl solutions for skin disinfection and wound irrigation are regulated as biocides or medical devices, depending on their intended use and claims. These commercial products usually contain lower HOCl concentrations (~50–300 μg g− 1 ) due to stability limitations in liquid formulations. However, effective biofilm eradication typically requires HOCl concentrations of 100–200 μg g− 1 for simple biofilms with extended contact times [32–34], while complex or mature biofilms in non-healing wounds may require high concentrations of 1000–3000 μg g− 1 for reliable eradication [35]. Higher-concentration HOCl formulations intended for biofilm eradication in chronic wounds may require medicinal product/drug classification due to stricter regulatory requirements, and at least medical device class II regulation in the U.S and class III within the EU [36,37]. To develop a stable high-concentration formulation of HOCl, it is crucial to address the aforementioned challenges, and a solid precursor of HOCl like calcium hypochlorite (Ca[OCl]2) could be a viable candidate.
Commercially available as a granule formulated product, Ca(OCl)2 is mainly used in water-treatment and pool disinfection worldwide. The high-concentration variant of commercial Ca(OCl)2 granules is called high-assay calcium hypochlorite. It contains approximately 70 % (w/w) Ca(OCl)2, and 30 % of other compounds, such as sodium chloride (NaCl), calcium chloride (CaCl2), calcium hydroxide (Ca[OH]2), chlorate salts (NaClO3 and Ca[ClO3]2) and moisture [38–40]. This composition results from the industrial production method where moist slaked lime (Ca[OH]2) reacts with chlorine gas (Cl2) [39,41]. Consequently, higher purity of Ca(OCl)2 is difficult to achieve since the process reaction inevitably produces CaCl2 as a byproduct alongside the desired calcium hypochlorite. However, higher purity also increases the risk of explosion and fire accidents during storage and transportation of Ca (OCl)2 [42].
Using solid Ca(OCl)2 over liquid hypochlorites, such as sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), presents several advantages. Firstly, solid Ca(OCl)2 offers better storage stability as liquid hypochlorites degrade more rapidly [43]. Consequently, higher concentration formulations are not limited by stability issues since Ca(OCl)2 is a solid prior to activation. Secondly, it reduces chlorate (ClO3 − ) formation, an unwanted byproduct, which occurs during production and storage degradation [41,44]. Lastly, the solid form and higher concentration of Ca(OCl)2 (approximately 70 % active chlorine content) simplify handling and storage compared to NaOCl, which typically contains only 10–15 % active chlorine.
has also been addressed by commercial sodium dichlorocyanurate (NaDCC) tablets by releasing HOCl and OCl− upon dissolution in water. Furthermore, these tablets have addressed the issue of liquid transportation entirely, while the use of Ca(OCl)2 proposes the transportation of suitable buffer media. Although NaDCC has proven effective for water disinfection and surface cleaning [45,46], clinical evidence for skin disinfection and wound biofilm applications remains limited. In contrast, Ca(OCl)2-based formulations eliminate cyanuric acid accumulation, which can reduce chlorine efficacy over time [47] and create regulatory challenges in pharmaceutical development due to uncertainty regarding toxicity in wounds. The use of a solid Ca(OCl)2/buffer system can potentially address the unique requirements of chronic wound care, including storage stability, precise pH control, rapid antimicrobial action, and compatibility with wound healing processes. Clinical safety testing of HOCl + acetate buffer in chronic venous leg ulcers has been reported by Fazli et al. with promising results [12]. This targeted approach positions Ca(OCl)2-based formulations to fill a distinct clinical niche that complements rather than directly competes with established NaDCC applications. Ca(OCl)2-based formulations may also offer distinct advantages over NaDCC for wound irrigation and intact skin disinfection applications. Importantly, this approach eliminates cyanuric acid/cyanurate formation, unlike NaDCC.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of high-assay calcium hypochlorite granules as a stable, solid precursor of HOCl. As stated above, although HOCl is highly effective against many pathogens, it is unstable and readily undergoes oxidation reactions [15,23,26]. For Ca (OCl)2 granules to serve as a suitable HOCl precursor, they must dissolve easily in aqueous media and convert to HOCl in situ. Preliminary tests indicated that the granular form did not dissolve instantly. Therefore, two hypotheses were proposed: 1) storing the active pharmaceutical ingredient as a solid precursor will extend the formulation's shelf life, and 2) grinding Ca(OCl)2 granules into a powder will enable instant dissolution of the powder in aqueous media, without compromising storage stability under the appropriate conditions.
The solubility and dissolution rates of basic compounds such as Ca (OCl)2 are high in acetic media. However, maintaining the pH above 4.0 is essential to avoid significant formation of Cl2 [15,26,48–50]. Previous studies [51] have shown that the formation of Cl2 takes place at low pH following the reaction (Eq. (1)):
H3O+ (aq) + HOCl (aq) + Cl− (aq) ⇌ 2H2O (l) + Cl2 (g) (1)
At higher pH levels, studies indicate that the decomposition and reaction rates of HOCl increase with pH, peaking at pH 6.9–7.1 [23,26]. ClO3 − becomes a significant degradation product at these pH values. Theoretical calculations suggest that Ca(OCl)2 dissolved in water at neutral pH (around pH 7) yields approximately 50 % of HOCl, and 50 % of its corresponding base, hypochlorite (OCl− ) [28,50]. Adjusting the pH to weakly acidic levels (~4–5) increases HOCl conversion while keeping the pH high enough to prevent chlorine gas formation.
To optimize the dissolution of Ca(OCl)2 and its conversion to HOCl, a mixed full-factorial experimental design was implemented with the aforementioned challenges in mind. The commercial Ca(OCl)2 granules were ground to a powder and sieved. The experimental variables included particle size, buffer strength of acetic acid, HOCl concentration, and shaking time.
Additionally, the reproducibility and user-friendliness of powdered Ca(OCl)2 as a HOCl precursor were investigated. Characteristics such as physical appearance and powder flow were examined. Given the alteration from granules to powder, a 24-month stability study at room temperature under different storage conditions was conducted. A shortterm test was also conducted, investigating the stability of powder compared to granules at different temperatures.
The problem related to storage stability of HOCl and liquid chlorine
Commercial calcium hypochlorite granules (≤70 %; Ca[OCl]2) was purchased from Barchemicals (MO, Italy). Glacial acetic acid (100 %; CH3COOH), sodium thiosulfate solution (0.1 M; Na2S2O3), potassium iodide (≥99.5 %; KI), iodine solution (0.05 M) and soluble starch were acquired from Merck (Darmstadt, DE). Sodium hydroxide (≥98.5 % pellets; NaOH) was purchased from VWR Chemicals (Radnor, PA, USA). Purified water was purchased from Fagron (Rotterdam, Netherlands) or prepared by a Milli-Q® water purification system for ultrapure water by Merck Millipore (Darmstadt, DE).
In the present work, commercial high-grade calcium hypochlorite with a 65–70 % available chlorine content will be referred to as Ca(OCl)2 granules, to differentiate it from the grinded calcium hypochlorite granules, herein referred to as powdered Ca(OCl)2 or Ca(OCl)2 powder. HOCl and Ca(OCl)2 concentrations are given in μg g− 1 or mass percentage units, respectively, rather than following the practice for drinking water and wastewater treatment of expressing free available chlorine in parts per million (ppm) of chlorine equivalents, usually expressed as "ppm available chlorine".
Powdered Ca(OCl)2 was freshly prepared by grinding commercially available granule product in a ceramic mortar in ambient conditions (eastern Norwegian indoors climate; room temperature between 20 and 25 ◦C). All powder was sieved through ≤45 μm, ≤75 μm, ≤125 μm, ≤150 μm, ≤180, ≤250 μm, 355 μm and ≤500 μm test sieves (Merck, Darmstadt, DE) in descending order.
Acetic acid buffer solutions (HOAc) of 0.25, 0.50, 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0 % concentrations (w/w) pH 4.3 ± 0.2 were prepared by diluting 100 % CH3COOH with purified water, and pH was adjusted by the addition of NaOH pellets or NaOH solution 50 % (w/w) prepared from the pellets.
Starch solution 1.0 % (w/v) was prepared by suspending 1.0 g of soluble starch with 5 mL of purified water, followed by adding 95 mL of boiled purified water to the mixture. Sensitivity was tested immediately with KI and iodine solution and retested each time if the batch was more than one day old.
Successively, 50 mL of purified water, 1.0 g of potassium iodide (KI) and 3 mL of glacial acetic acid were introduced into a flask. 100 mg of the solid sample (either granules or powdered variant) was transferred into the flask and titrated immediately with 0.1 M sodium thiosulfate (Na2S2O3), adding 2 mL of starch solution just prior to the equivalence point as an indicator. The titration was performed in triplicates with a standardized 25-mL burette (VWR chemicals, Radnor, PA, USA).
The concentration of Ca(OCl)2, w1, expressed as a mass fraction in %, is given by Eq. (2).
$$\mathbf{w}_{1} = \frac{\mathbf{V} \times \mathbf{3.575}}{\mathbf{m}_{1}} \times \mathbf{100\%} \tag{2}$$
where V is the volume of the Na2S2O3 titration standard, in mL, m1 is the mass of the granule or powder sample in milligram and 3.575 is the mass of Ca(OCl)2 in mg corresponding to 1.00 mL of the titration standard c (Na2S2O3) = 0.1 M.
Successively, 10.00–25.00 g of the sample solution (depending on the theoretical concentration) and 0.5 g KI were introduced into a flask.
The solution was titrated immediately with 0.1 M Na2S2O3, adding 1 mL of starch solution just prior to the equivalence point as an indicator. In samples containing acetic acid buffers, 2 mL of glacial acetic acid was added at the end of the titration check for any remaining active chlorine species besides HOCl. The titration was performed with a standardized 25-mL burette (VWR chemicals, Radnor, PA, USA). The content was then calculated according to Eq. (3).
pH measurements were performed using an inoLab multi 9310 IDS pH-meter (Xylem Analytics, Letchwork, England) after calibration with calibration buffers pH 1.00, 4.00 and 7.00 (Merck, Darmstadt, DE).
The dissolution of powdered Ca(OCl)2 in acetic acid buffer media was investigated in a multivariate mixed full-factorial experimental design. MODDE® version 5.0 (Umetrics, Sweden) was utilized for the design of experiments (DoE) and multivariate data analyses. The powder, equivalent to theoretical amounts of either 200 or 2000 μg g− 1 HOCl, was dissolved in 200 mL acetic acid buffer media 0.5 or 3.0 % (w/ w). Powdered Ca(OCl)2 was investigated at six levels: particle size ranges ≤45 μm, 45–75 μm, 125–150 μm, 180–250 μm, 250–355 μm and 355–500 μm. Shaking time was 1 or 10 s on a digital vortex genie 2 230v (Scientific Industries, New York, USA) set at 2500 rpm to mix the samples. Aliquots (10.00–25.00 g) were removed from the surface of each sample and quantified immediately and compared to controls (fully dissolved samples). The dissolution of controls was examined visually against a black background. Granules were also tested and used as delivered by the manufacturer. The experiment was repeated two times (n = 3).
The concentration of HOCl, w2, expressed as a mass fraction in μg g− 1 , given by Eq. (3):
$$\omega_2 = \frac{V \times 2623}{m_2} \tag{3}$$
where V is the volume of the Na2S2O3 titration standard, in mL, m2 is the mass of the test sample in grams and 2623 is the mass of HOCl in μg corresponding to 1.00 mL of the titration standard c(Na2S2O3) = 0.1 M. Experimental data was fitted to Eq. (3) to extract HOCl concentrations. The dissolution of powdered Ca(OCl)2 and subsequent conversion to HOCl at a given time point (1 or 10 s) was then calculated by dividing the quantified HOCl concentration of test samples with their respective controls, reported as a yield percentage of Ca(OCl)2 dissolved relative to control in Eq. (4):
$$\text{yield } \%= \frac{\text{c}_1}{\text{c}_2} \times 100\text{\%} \tag{4}$$
where c1 is the concentration of HOCl after shaking at a given time point and c2 is the concentration of the corresponding control sample. Eq. (3) is also applicable for the calculation of the active chlorine content, the general term consisting of OCl− , HOCl and Cl2. However, for simplicity and better interpretation, we chose to calculate it as HOCl since this compound is the major product in the expected acid/base reaction to take place, shown in Eq. (5).
Ca(OCl)2 (s) + 2CH3COOH (aq) → 2HOCl (aq) + 2CH3COO− (aq) + Ca2+ (aq) (5)
Note that the reaction takes place primarily between pH 4.0 and 5.6, at room temperature. The pKa value of HOCl at 20–25 ◦C is between 7.53 and 7.58, and when the pH value is two units below pKa, the HOCl to OCl− content will be ≥ 99 % [49]. pH measurements were conducted on
each sample and confirmed to be between 4.26 and 5.56. pH below 4.0 is avoided as chlorine gas starts forming, as described by Wang et al. [15] in Fig. 1.
The mass of Ca(OCl)2 powder and granules, equivalent to theoretical concentrations of 200–1000 μg g− 1 HOCl, was weighed on a Sartorius ENTRIS224i-1S analytical balance to 0.3 mg precision. Granules were used as-is and the particle size range of the powder was 125–150 μm. The solid was subsequently dissolved in acetic acid buffer 0.25–3.0 % (w/w) pH 4.3 ± 0.2 in a glass beaker at room temperature. In total, five different combinations of HOCl + HOAc were tested: 200 μg g− 1 HOCl +0.25 % HOAc; 500 μg g− 1 HOCl +1.0 % HOAc; 500 μg g− 1 HOCl +2.0 % HOAc; 500 μg g− 1 HOCl +3.0 % HOAc; 1000 μg g− 1 HOCl +3.0 % HOAc. Three replicate samples were made for each combination (n = 3).
To normalize each data point, the experimental data was fitted into Eq. (2) instead of Eq. (3). The reproducibility is represented by the variation within the same group.
The powder flow of powdered Ca(OCl)2, particle size ranges 150–180 μm, 180–250 μm, 250–355 μm and 355–500 μm, was performed in accordance with European pharmacopoeia methods Angle of repose and Compressibility index and Hausner ratio (Ph. Eur. 11.5 20936, 07/2023). The angle of repose was investigated using a Pharma Test Type PTG powder characterization system (Hainburg, Germany) via the fixed funnel method. The compressibility index and Hausner ratio were determined with a STAV 2003 Jolting Volumeter (J. Engelsmann AG, Ludwigshafen, Germany) with a 250 mL cylinder (Funke Gerber, Berlin, Germany).
The angle of repose was calculated based on Eq. (6), as shown below:

Fig. 1. The speciation of chlorine as a function of pH. Reproduced with permission from Wang et al. [15] under the Creative Commons Attribution License, Journal of Burns and Wounds; published by HMP Global, United States, 2007.
$$\text{Angle of response} = \tan^{-1}\left(\frac{2h}{d}\right) \tag{6}$$
where h is the height of the powder, and the d is the width of the base of the cone. The Hausner ratio and compressibility index were calculated according to equations (7) and (8), respectively:
$$\text{Hausner ratio} = \frac{\mathbf{V}_0}{\mathbf{V}_f} \tag{7}$$
$$\text{Compressibility index} = 100 \left( \frac{V_0 - V_f}{V_0} \right) \tag{8}$$
where V0 is the unsettled apparent volume, and Vf is the final tapped volume.
Ca(OCl)2 granules and powder were stored for 14 days at 25, 40 and 54 ◦C in VWR Incu-line IL 250R climate chambers (Radnor, PA, USA). All samples were stored in amber polyethylene (PET) bottles flushed with argon gas. The mass loss after storage was performed by comparing the mass of each sample at day 0 (baseline) with the mass at day 14, using a Sartorius Entris II analytical scale calibrated with 1.00 g and 100.00 g weights.
Powdered Ca(OCl)2 was stored for a total of 24 months. Two storage conditions were investigated: ambient and dry conditions. Here, the 'ambient condition' is defined as samples stored in amber glass bottles at 25 ◦C in a VWR Incu-line IL 250R climate chamber. The 'dry condition' differs from the 'ambient condition' as samples are additionally stored in a desiccator with calcium chloride as a desiccant. All samples were stored for 12 months. The samples were then moved to a lab bench (23 ± 2 ◦C) and stored for another 12 months, for a total of 24 months storage. The samples were not flushed with argon gas prior to bottling.
The physical appearance of powdered Ca(OCl)2 was visually examined after two weeks storage at 25, 40 and 54 ◦C. It was also examined after 3, 6, 12 and 24 months of storage protected from light in a desiccator at room temperature (23 ± 2 ◦C) and in ambient conditions.
The percentage (w/w) dissolved material of the commercial highassay Ca(OCl)2 granules in acetic acid (HOAc) buffer at pH 4.3 ± 0.2 was not satisfactory (below 95 % conversion rate), as seen in Fig. 2A and B. The amount of Ca(OCl)2 to dissolve is expressed as the theoretical concentration of HOCl as either 200 or 2000 μg g− 1 , which is equivalent to 40.6 mg and 406.0 mg high-assay Ca(OCl)2 (67.1 % w/w purity) per 100 mL acetic acid buffer, respectively. Two time points were chosen: 1 s to represent an almost "instantly dissolved" scenario, and 10 s as a maximum acceptable time for shaking. The results showed that the conversion rate was at best 39.3 % ± 2.0 (see Fig. 2A) for the combination of Ca(OCl)2 granules equivalent to 200 μg g− 1 HOCl dissolved in 3.0 % HOAc buffer and shaken for 1 s, and 70.6 % ± 1.9 (see Fig. 2B) for the combination of Ca(OCl)2 granules equivalent to 200 μg g− 1 HOCl dissolved in 3.0 % HOAc buffer and shaken for 10 s.
Commercial Ca(OCl)2 granules dissolved too slowly and were grinded into powders of six particle size ranges, ranging from ≤45 to 500 μm. For all samples shaken for 1 s, samples at size range 125–150 μm gave the highest and most consistent conversion from Ca(OCl)2 to HOCl

Fig. 2. A & B: The conversion rate of powdered calcium hypochlorite (particle sizes ≤45-≤500 μm) and granules to hypochlorous acid, equivalent to 200 or 2000 μg g− 1 , after shaking for A) 1 s and B) 10 s in acetic acid buffers.
averaging at 98.8 % ± 1.0 across all combinations of buffer strength and amount of Ca(OCl)2 powder added. Combination 200 μg g− 1 HOCl in 3.0 % HOAc buffer converted fully (100.0 % ± 0.0) to HOCl, while combination 2000 μg g− 1 HOCl in 3.0 % HOAc buffer converted 98.3 ± 0.8. 1-second shaking for size range 180–250 μm was feasible with an average conversion of 98.4 % ± 1.7 Ca(OCl)2. 250–355 μm showed the highest conversion at 92.6 % ± 2.8 for the combination 200 μg g− 1 HOCl in 3.0 % HOAc buffer, and the lowest was 72.7 % ± 1.9 for the combination 2000 μg g− 1 HOCl in 0.5 % HOAc buffer, when samples were shaken for 1 s. Size range 355–500 μm, had a slower dissolution but followed the same trend; the highest conversion from Ca(OCl)2 was 70.5 % ± 4.2 for the combination 200 μg g− 1 in 3.0 % HOAc buffer, and the lowest was 50.2 % ± 6.2 for the combination 2000 μg g− 1 HOCl in 0.5 % HOAc buffer. These conversion rates are not considered satisfactory compared to the smaller particle sizes tested, specifically 125–150 and 180–250 μm, as the goal of shaking for 1 s was to test for 'instant release' of HOCl from the solid precursor Ca(OCl)2. Particle aggregation was observed for particle sizes ≤45 μm and 45–75 μm due to cohesive forces. When dissolved in 3.0 % (w/w) HOAc buffer, several of these samples aggregated in the solvent, before fully dissolving into a clear solution, which resulted in lower conversions of Ca(OCl)2 to HOCl and higher standard deviations, especially for samples shaken at only 1 s (Fig. 2A). When shaking time was adjusted from 1 to 10 s, the percentage of dissolved matter increased for all particle sizes (see Fig. 2B). Conversion percentages were above 99.4 % for size ranges ≤45, 125–150, 180–250 and 250–355 μm and the standard deviations were below 0.9, regardless of the HOAc and HOCl concentration composition. Samples with particle size range 355–500 μm converted on average 97.4 % ± 3.0 of Ca(OCl)2 to HOCl, and the lowest amount dissolved was at 92.7 % ± 1.8 for the combination of 2000 μg g− 1 HOCl in 0.5 % HOAc buffer.
As mentioned, the dissolution and conversion of high-assay Ca(OCl)2 granules (i.e., the original commercial granules) was deemed suboptimal, and several steps were taken to optimize the dissolution rate. Wojtowicz [38] reports that the theoretical solubility of the Ca(OCl)2 compound to be 21 g per 100 mL water at 25 ◦C. Since the samples with the highest concentration equal less than 500 mg high-assay Ca(OCl)2 per 100 mL, the theoretical solubility of Ca(OCl)2 should not be the limiting factor here. However, Ca(OCl)2 granules are formulated to minimize moisture-induced decomposition and typically have particle sizes ranging from 0.30 to 2.38 mm (5–80 mesh) [40]. This delays the dissolution and thus the conversion of Ca(OCl)2 to HOCl. Several parameters influencing dissolution were therefore optimized using the
Noyes-Whitney equation (9). As evident in this equation, the greater the solubility of a compound, the greater is the compound's dissolution rate:
$$\frac{\text{dM}}{\text{dt}} = \text{kS}(\text{C}_{t} - \text{C}) \tag{9}$$
where dM/dt is the mass rate of dissolution, k is the dissolution rate constant, S is the surface area of the exposed solid, Cs is the solubility of the solid at the particle surface and C is the concentration of the solid in a bulk solution at time t. According to this equation (9), as the particle size is reduced, the total effective surface area, S, is increased and thereby the dissolution rate is enhanced. Powder fineness is classified by the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur. 11.5 20935, 04/2019) into four groups: coarse (>355 μm), moderately fine (180–355 μm), fine (125–180 μm) and very fine (≤125 μm). Ca(OCl)2 granules were for this reason mechanically powdered to particle sizes between 45 and 500 μm. To additionally aid the dissolution rate of Ca(OCl)2, stirring the media by shaking was introduced to the experimental design, thus reducing the diffusion layer's thickness. It was also important to control the pH value of the test samples since HOCl is the dominant chlorine species at pH 4.0–5.6 (see Fig. 1). Samples were kept within this pH interval and close to pH 4.3 ± 0.2 when possible, to avoid added significant decomposition errors to the dissolution study. Furthermore, HOCl is a strong oxidizer, which means a suitable solvent of Ca(OCl)2 is preferably an acidic buffer, has a pKa value higher than 4.0 but lower than 5.6 and does not contain reducing functional groups [50]. This was the reason for dissolving Ca(OCl)2 in acetic acid buffer (HOAc buffer), as the pKa value of acetic acid is 4.76 at 25 ◦C, and this compound cannot be oxidized by HOCl or Ca(OCl)2 [52]. The proposed acid-base reaction of Ca(OCl)2 in HOAc buffer at pH 4.3 ± 0.2 is shown below (Eq. (10)):
Adam et al. [23] reports that acetic acid buffers (0.352 M, i.e. 2.1 % w/w) increase the initial rate of HOCl decomposition by a factor of 1.3 compared to non-buffered systems, however their experiments were conducted at pH 7.1, where the decomposition rate is close to the maximum and the buffer effect of acetate is no longer present.
The particle aggregation observed within this study is consistent with literature, which reports that particle sizes falling below 100 μm become more cohesive [53]. In the present study, the cohesive forces are further enhanced by the high ionic strength in the acetic acid buffer, as the powder dissolution rate is determined by its solubility in the diffusion layer surrounding each dissolving particle. The same cohesive
tendencies in media were not observed for Ca(OCl)2 powder dissolved in the weaker HOAc buffer (0.5 % w/w), as depicted in Fig. 2A and B. Particle size ranges ≤45 and 45–75 μm were difficult to work with overall, other examples being the challenge of weighing the correct amount of powder for sampling, and aggregation formation in the powder containers due to cohesive and adhesive effects.
The following four factors were studied in the full factorial design: particle size, acetic acid buffer concentration, amount of Ca(OCl)2 powder added (expressed as the theoretical concentration of HOCl) and shaking time (shake). The response factor was the dissolution and subsequent conversion of solid Ca(OCl)2 to HOCl. The overall results are depicted in Fig. 2A and B and discussed in section 3.1. The multiple linear regression analysis (see Fig. 3) revealed that three out of four main effects were statistically significant: particle size (****p < 0.000), shaking time (****p < 0.000), and HOCl content (***p < 0.001). The response factor, i.e. the dissolution (or the conversion rate percentage) decreases with increasing particle size and HOCl concentration, whereas it increases with increased shaking time (see Fig. 4A–C). The effect of HOAc buffer concentration alone was not significant (p > 0.05), however the interaction effect with particle size was (**p < 0.01, Fig. 5A). All interaction plots from statistically significant interactions are shown in Fig. 5A–D. Interactions and non-linearity were mostly observed between particle size and the other factors. There was especially a strong interaction effect observed for shaking time and particle size (****p < 0.000, Figs. 3 and 5B). Furthermore, Fig. 5D depicts that shaking time interacts positively with the amount of Ca(OCl)2 powder added (*p < 0.05). In other words, by increasing the time of shaking, powder dissolved faster and gave better conversion rates even for highconcentration (2000 μg g− 1 HOCl) samples. The model obtained from the design was statistically significant (****p < 0.000) with a coefficient of determination, R2 , of 0.74.
Reproducibility of high-assay Ca(OCl)2 granules and powder as an HOCl-precursor was investigated since the former is a commercial product with a concentration of about 70 % (w/w). A variable particle size range (0.30–2.38 mm [40]) in the granule product may also impact the reproducibility of each sampling. A low reproducibility would impact the potential use of high-assay Ca(OCl)2 for future product development. Five different combinations of Ca(OCl)2 powder or granules dissolved in HOAc buffer medium (here referred to as HOCl + HOAc) were investigated, and the variance between the two types of Ca

Fig. 3. Main and interaction effects on hypochlorous acid conversion rates. Part. = particle size; shaking = shaking time; HOCl = the theoretical hypochlorous acid concentration from powdered calcium hypochlorite; HOAc = acetic acid buffer.

Fig. 4. A–C: Main effect plots for three significant factors: A) particle size, B) shaking time and C) powdered calcium hypochlorite given as theoretical concentrations of hypochlorous acid. For the sake of simplicity, the particle size is given as the size of their sieve mask rather than range. 45 = ≤45 μm, 75 = 45–75 μm, 150 = 125–150 μm, 250 = 180–250 μm, 355 = 250–355 μm, 500 = 355–500 μm. The results are given as mean value ± SD from three independent experiments.
The results showed that the standard deviations were lower for every combination using powder compared to granules. As expected, the powder formulation has a higher reproducibility compared to granules as-is when dissolved in acetic acid buffer as a HOCl precursor.
Results on flow behavior of powdered Ca(OCl)2 are summarized in Table 1. Unsurprisingly, particle sizes 355–500 μm showed the best flow properties, as the flowability decreased for the descending particle sizes. Particle sizes below 150 μm was not tested as the sample powder did not flow due to adhesive/cohesive forces. In general, fine particles with very high surface-to-mass ratios are more adhesive/cohesive than coarse particles which are more influenced by gravitational forces [53]. Particles larger than 250 μm are usually relatively free flowing, however, it

Fig. 5. A–D: Significant interaction effect plots for A) the effect of high- and low-level acetic acid buffer as a function of particle size, B) the effect of high- and lowlevel of shaking time as a function of particle size, C) the effect of high- and low-level concentrations of powdered calcium hypochlorite as a function of particle size, and D) the effect of high and low concentrations of powdered calcium hypochlorite as a function of shaking time. For the sake of simplicity, the particle size is given as the size of their sieve mask rather than range. 45 = ≤45 μm, 75 = 45–75 μm, 150 = 125–150 μm, 250 = 180–250 μm, 355 = 250–355 μm, 500 = 355–500 μm.

Fig. 6. Reproducibility investigation of using calcium hypochlorite granules versus powder as a hypochlorous acid precursor. Five different combinations of hypochlorous acid concentrations and acetic acid buffer concentrations (HOCl + HOAc) were tested. The results are given as mean value ± SD from three independent experiments.
is important to find a reasonable particle size with regards to powder flow and dissolution in media (see section 3.1). Particle sizes that fall below 100 μm become more adhesive and cohesive, which was experimentally observed for powdered Ca(OCl)2 when dissolving it in acetic acid buffer (see section 3.1).
The shape of the powders was not investigated. Mechanical grinding in mortar and pestle was utilized in this study to powder the Ca(OCl)2 granules into smaller particle sizes. Spheres have minimum interparticle contact whereas a group of particle flakes or dendritic particles have a high surface-to-volume ratio and thereby poorer flow properties. For future optimization of flow behavior, this aspect should be investigated.
The stability of Ca(OCl)2 granules compared to the reformulated powdered variant, was investigated. The recovery percentage is displayed after 14 days of storage protected from light at different temperatures: 25, 40 and 54 ◦C, shown in Fig. 7. 25 ◦C was chosen to represent ambient conditions; 40 ◦C to represent warmer climates and preliminary test accelerated ambient conditions; 54 ◦C to represent worst case scenario and test accelerated ambient conditions. According to ECHA's Guidance on the Biocidal Products Regulation, storage at 54 ◦C for 14 days may indicate 24 months storage as long as the compound is not heat sensitive [54]. The results showed that the granule formulation was not significantly more stable than powder (p 25◦C = 0.19, p 40◦C > 0.99, p 54◦C = 0.84) when stored in closed and dry compartments after 14 days. However, one thing to note is that grinding the granules to powder decomposes the Ca(OCl)2 content significantly (****p < 0.0001) from 71.31 % ± 0.77 to 67.33 ± 0.55 (mean ± SD). After the initial decomposition, the stability of powdered Ca(OCl)2 is not compromised as long as the storage condition is dry and at room temperature. Furthermore, temperature had a significant negative impact on the stability of Ca(OCl)2, whether as granules or powder, supporting previous findings by Gray and Halliburton [55] on thermal calcium hypochlorite decomposition. The recovery yield after 14 days for powder was 100.6 % ± 2.0 at 25 ◦C, 96.0 % ± 0.9 at 40 ◦C and 71.8 % ± 1.0 at 54 ◦C. Mass loss was respectively 0.0 %, 0.2 % and 0.7 % at 25 ◦C, 40 ◦C and 54 ◦C. Based on these results, the mass loss may therefore be an indication of Ca(OCl)2 degradation. Bibby and Milestone [56] have
Table 1
Angle of repose, Hausner ratio and compressibility index of powdered Ca(OCl)2, particle size ranges 180-250 μm, 250-355 μm and 355-500 μm. Results are given as a mean value of three measurements ± SD.
| Particle size range (μm) |
Flowability (seconds, per 100 g sample) |
Angle of repose (degrees) |
Hausner ratio | Compressibility index (%) |
Flow property |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 150–180 180–250 250–355 |
Failed 3.00 ± 0.04 2.54 ± 0.02 |
Failed 33.1 ± 2.0 28.9 ± 0.5 |
– 1.24 ± 0.00 1.17 ± 0.01 |
– 19.1 ± 0.3 14.7 ± 0.7 |
Faileda Moderately fine powder. Fair flow Moderately fine powder. Good flow |
| 355–500 | 2.46 ± 0.04 | 26.8 ± 0.0 | 1.12 ± 0.01 | 10.9 ± 0.3 | Course particles. Good flow |
a The powder clogged in the funnel.

Fig. 7. Short-term recovery of calcium hypochlorite granules and powder at 25, 40 and 54 ◦C after 14 days of storage. The results are given as mean ± SD from three formulation batches. Asterisks (*) denote significant differences, *p < 0.05, ****p < 0.0001, ns = non-significant.
reported that the Ca(OCl)2 compound decomposes at ca. 180 ◦C. Mass loss has previously been observed in high-grade bleaching powder around 50 ◦C, though the aforementioned authors believe this loss is dehydration, due to the hygroscopic nature of Ca(OCl)2 to readily absorb water from the atmosphere when finely ground. However, quantification and statistical tests indicate that Ca(OCl)2 significantly decomposes (****p < 0.0001) at 54 ◦C compared to 25 ◦C, and that decomposition also occurs at 40 ◦C (p < 0.02). For this reason, accelerated stability testing is not compatible for high-assay Ca(OCl)2, especially above 50 ◦C. All samples were flushed with argon gas to avoid the introduction of external moisture to the experimental setup at the time of bottling.
Based on the results from the short-term storage test, a long-term stability study at 23 ± 2 ◦C was performed using freshly powdered Ca (OCl)2 with particle size ≤150 μm. Ideally, the long-term stability tests should have been conducted for particle sizes ≥250 μm, ≤355 μm due to the experimental findings in flow behavior (see section 3.2), however this experiment was carried out before the flow of powdered Ca(OCl)2 was investigated. The short-term stability study (section 3.4.1) indicates that smaller particles were not significantly different in stability compared to larger particles when stored in closed and dry compartments. It is therefore reasonable to assume that the findings in the longterm stability study are applicable for particle sizes above 150 μm as well.
Two conditions for long-term storage were investigated, ambient (powder in brown glass vial) and dry (powder in brown glass vial in a desiccator with calcium chloride). Since Ca(OCl)2 is a hygroscopic solid as previously mentioned, absorption of moister from the air could significantly impact the stability of powdered Ca(OCl)2. Recovery percentage of Ca(OCl)2 is displayed after 6, 12 and 24 months of storage, as
depicted in Fig. 8. Ca(OCl)2 is highly stable at room temperature and decomposes slowly when stored in tight and closed compartments (here defined as ambient conditions). After 6, 12 and 24 months, the recovery of Ca(OCl)2 was 98.7 % ± 0.3, 97.6 % ± 0.4 and 95.0 % ± 0.7, respectively. This means powdered Ca(OCl)2 had a total of 5.0 % decomposition after two years during 'normal' storage. When samples were stored in a desiccator to provide an extra dry environment, recovery percentage was 100.1 % ± 0.4 after 24 months. These results agree with the claim by Bibby and Milestone [56], where they argue that in the absence of free water, high-grade bleaching powder appeared to be stable indefinitely at room temperature. They also report that Ca (OCl)2 granules under normal storage conditions are slightly unstable and loses active chlorine content generally proportional to the free water content, which is around 4 % per year. Our results show that although there is significant loss in Ca(OCl)2 content when comparing ambient storage to dry at 12 months, with the same trend increasing after 24 months, a total of 5 % degradation of the active ingredient is still an acceptable shelf-life. The differences at 6 months storage between the two groups are non-significant (p = 0.06). Fig. 8 also shows a third condition where Ca(OCl)2 powder was stored in a pharma grade PET bottle, however, the data obtained is only from one single batch that was opened several times before and after assay (analyzed in triplicates, n = 3). It is included to illustrate how quickly Ca(OCl)2 decomposes in the presence of free water since Ca(OCl)2 rapidly absorbs water from the atmosphere, especially when finely ground. The loss of active substance after one year is >7 %.

Fig. 8. Long-term recovery of powdered calcium hypochlorite after 6, 12 and 24 months of storage in two different storage conditions; 'ambient glass' = powder in brown glass vial and 'dry' = powder in brown glass vial in a desiccator, at 23 ± 2 ◦C. Results are shown as mean value ± SD of three formulation batches. Asterisks (*) denote significant differences, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 ns = non-significant. The figure also shows one batch of powdered calcium hypochlorite (results are given as mean value of three analysis ±SD) stored in a PET bottle for 6 and 12 months. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Powdered Ca(OCl)2 samples stored at 25 ◦C for 14 days had slightly caked (short-term storage samples) appearance. This was probably due to the moisture absorbed by Ca(OCl)2. The same was observed for samples stored at 40 ◦C. The caking tendency was significantly higher at 54 ◦C than at 40 ◦C, and the amber PET bottle was bleached at the bottom. There was less caking in the granules short-term storage samples.
After two years in dry and ambient storage at 23 ± 2 ◦C, the powdered Ca(OCl)2 samples were slightly caked and had to be lightly shaken to de-cake, especially the ambient condition samples. Samples were not discolored, and discoloration was not observed on the amber glass vial package material either.
This study successfully demonstrated a two-year stability of reformulated high-assay calcium hypochlorite as a finely ground powder under both ambient (≥95 % yield) and dry conditions (≥100 % yield) at room temperature. Temperatures above 40 ◦C and moisture should be avoided, as they negatively impact the stability of Ca(OCl)2. After optimization, powdered Ca(OCl)2 rapidly dissolved and converted to the major free chlorine species hypochlorous acid in an acetic acid buffer. Multivariate evaluation indicated that particle size and shaking time significantly affect dissolution. A 1-s shake, simulating instant release, with particles sized 180–250 μm resulted in ≥98 % conversion. Although not 100 %, this demonstrates a near-instant conversion to HOCl with minimal shaking while still exhibiting a fair powder flow. For complete conversion and optimal flow behavior, the ideal particle size is between 250 and 355 μm with 10 s of shaking.
In conclusion, this study is the first to demonstrate that stable HOCl products can be developed by dissolving the highly stable powdered Ca (OCl)2 in acetic acid buffer in situ. This novel formulation addresses the major stability issues observed in ready-to use HOCl formulations, particularly at high concentrations (>200 μg g− 1 ), by keeping chlorine separated from the liquid phase during storage.
The novelty of our formulation lies in several key innovations that address current limitations in chlorine-based antimicrobial delivery. Most significantly, the system provides single-use precision through exact dosing control, eliminating the need for tablet splitting or multiple units that characterize current NaDCC approaches. The formulation incorporates pH optimization through acetate buffering, which maintains the optimal pH range (4.3–5.6) for maximum HOCl release and antimicrobial activity without requiring the pH adjustments. The study has also experimentally proven a new method for formulating an in-situ stable product that combines two antimicrobial compounds—hypochlorous acid (HOCl) and acetic acid (HOAc)— stable at high concentrations. The system also demonstrates immediate activation with faster chlorine release at room temperature compared to NaDCC tablets, which require 30 s to 5 min for dissolution [57,58]. While our studies incorporated agitation to enhance dissolution and HOCl release, the inherent speed advantage remains evident. A critical innovation is also the elimination of cyanuric acid accumulation. Finally, the formulation enables ergonomic packaging innovations, such as flat bottles with small volumes, that optimize portability for field applications including military operations, emergency response, and remote healthcare settings, which potentially can provide rapid, stable wound treatment solutions when battlefield conditions demand immediate infection control. These findings facilitate the development of high-concentration and stable in situ formulations of HOCl, contributing to the global fight against biofilm infections and rising threat of antimicrobial resistance.
Aina Kristin Pham: Writing – original draft, Visualization,
Resources, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. Marianne Hiorth: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Resources, Methodology. Pål Rongved: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Resources, Project administration, Methodology, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization.
Data is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
This research is funded by the Norwegian Research Council (grant 311402 for the industrial Ph.D. Scheme) and SoftOx Solutions AS.
The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Professor Marianne Hiorth is an Editorial Board Member/Editor-in-Chief/Associate Editor/Guest Editor for this journal and was not involved in the editorial review or the decision to publish this article. Aina K. Pham, the corresponding and lead author of this article is employed as an industrial PhD candidate and receives 50 % funding from SoftOx Solutions A/S, Fornebu, Norway. No conflict of interest applies to the rest of the authors.
The authors are grateful to Polypure AS for lending an analytical chemistry lab bench to AP while SoftOx Solutions built a new R&D lab. Furthermore, we thank Barchemicals for providing samples of calcium hypochlorite granules. The authors would also like to express their gratitude to Tove Larsen from the University of Oslo for the technical support.
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jddst.2025.107292.
Data is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The author does not have permission to share all data.
P. Zheng, B. Sartorius, A.D. Lopez, A. Stergachis, C. Moore, C. Dolecek, M. Naghavi, Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis, Lancet 399 (10325) (2022) 629–655.
a, S. Colominas, J. Gavalda, In vitro and in vivo antimicrobial activity of hypochlorous acid against drug-resistant and biofilm-producing strains, Microbiol. Spectr. 10 (5) (2022).Building tools?
Free accounts include 100 API calls/year for testing.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.