Interim / Quarterly Report • Aug 21, 2014
Interim / Quarterly Report
Open in ViewerOpens in native device viewer
| Second quarter | Year To Date | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 (In tonnes) | Own | 3rd Parties | Total | YoY % | Own | 3rd Parties | Total | YoY % |
| Palm Oil | 56 127 | 13 285 | 69 412 | 7.85% | 106 217 | 25 007 | 131 224 | 8.79% |
| Rubber | 2 370 | 205 | 2 575 | -2.61% | 5 174 | 371 | 5 545 | 5.10% |
| Tea | 717 | 717 | 3.17% | 1 369 | 1 369 | -2.21% | ||
| Bananas | 6 007 | 6 007 | 11.10% | 13 904 | 13 904 | 17.60% |
| 2013 (In tonnes) | Own | 3rd Parties | Total | Own | 3rd Parties | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Palm Oil | 50 380 | 13 979 | 64 359 | 95 455 | 25 161 | 120 616 |
| Rubber | 2 487 | 157 | 2 644 | 5 000 | 276 | |
| Tea | 695 | 695 | 1 400 | |||
| Bananas | 5 407 | 5 407 | 11 823 |
| Own 3rd Parties | Total | |
|---|---|---|
| 95 455 | 25 161 | 120 616 |
| 5 0 0 0 | 276 | 5 2 7 6 |
| 1400 | 1400 | |
| 11823 | 11823 |
Contrary to the rather poor volumes in 2013, palm oil production in Indonesia and Malaysia saw an upward trend during the first half of 2014. The same could be seen in the yields of our mature plantations in North Sumatra, which increased by 16.6% in comparison with last year. The young plants in the UMW/TUM project are slowly reaching cruising speed and represent a 36.6% increase in the group's oil volumes. Even in Agro Muko in the Province of Bengkulu production has increased by 7.9% compared with the same period last year, in spite of an intensive replanting programme that reduced the mature palm area by more than 10%.
Repairing bridges and roads following the exceptional rainy season during the first four months took longer than expected at Hargy Oil Palms Ltd in Papua New Guinea. Palm oil production of our own plantations rose by 5.7% compared with last year, although some of the smallholders continued to be difficult to reach, so that less fruit could be collected from third parties for processing in our oil extraction mills.
The previously announced positive production trend in the group's rubber activities was maintained, except for the Melania plantation in South Sumatra where an early and more pronounced foliation temporarily disturbed production. The group's volume rose by 5.1% in comparison with last year. This is mainly due to the higher volumes in young plants in Agro Muko, as well as the additional efforts in Papua New Guinea.
Tea production that had been adversely affected by weather conditions and leaf-eating insects has returned to normal levels in the last two months, so that it is only 2.2% down from last year's figures. Banana production in Ivory Coast escaped the usual drought in January and was also exceptionally good during the second quarter (+ 17.8%).
| in USD/tonne* | YTD Q2/14 | YTD Q2/13 | YTD Q4/13 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Palm oil | CIF Rotterdam | 899 | 852 | 857 |
| Rubber | RSS3 FOB Singapore | 2 187 | 3 030 | 2 795 |
| Tea | FOB origin | 2 140 | 2 610 | 2 399 |
| Bananas | FOT Europe | 1 097 | 1 084 | 1 022 |
* World Commodity Price Data
The second quarter of 2014 demonstrated a slow offtake pattern by palm oil importers. The strong price development of palm oil, including inverses, in February/March and the fact that a record amount of South American soybean oil hit the market, created a market environment where palm oil was less competitive. Due to this slow demand the stocks grew unusually, taking steam out of market prices. More initially friendly factors evaded during the second quarter: the dry spell of January/February had little impact on the immediate crop; it became clearer that Indonesia was not meeting its targets of the biodiesel (B10) mandate; and the risk of a strong El Niño disappeared over time. During the quarter the palm oil market gradually dropped by USD 50 from USD 900 to USD 850 CIF Rotterdam.
The price of palm kernel oil continued to be strongly supported by the very tight coconut oil market, which has lost a significant share of its supply since the typhoon in the Philippines last year. However, the higher prices for palm kernel oil could not be sustained, and discounting in relation to coconut oil increased gradually with the better palm production outlook for the second half of 2014. The palm kernel oil market dropped from USD 1 300 to USD 1 170 CIF Rotterdam, but is still at a premium of over USD 300 versus palm oil.
High stocks and the lack of buying interest kept weighing on the rubber market. Despite some indication that China's macro-economic conditions could be turning, it could not spark the rubber market. The price of Sicom RSS3 dropped further from USD 2 300 to a low of USD 1 925. Given the lack of selling interest around these low levels it could indicate that the bottom has been reached.
The tea production trend in Kenya remained in line with last year's record crop and continued to pressure the auction prices in Mombasa, to which our Cibuni tea prices are closely linked. In June the Mombasa auction was at its lowest level since December 2008 !
| 30/06/2014 | 30/06/2013* | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In KUSD (condensed) | Before IAS41 |
IAS41 | IFRS | Before IAS41 |
IAS41 | IFRS |
| Revenue | 157 702 | 157 702 | 149 498 | 149 498 | ||
| Cost of sales | -113 664 | 3 364 | -110 300 | -113 527 | 2 145 | -111 382 |
| Gross profit | 44 038 | 3 364 | 47 402 | 35 971 | 2 145 | 38 116 |
| Variation biological assets | 8 591 | 8 591 | 14 988 | 14 988 | ||
| Planting cost (net) | -6 732 | -6 732 | -13 741 | -13 741 | ||
| Selling, general and administrative expenses | -13 042 | -13 042 | -12 066 | -12 066 | ||
| Other operating income/(charges) | 94 | 94 | 1 584 | 1 584 | ||
| Operating result | 31 090 | 5 224 | 36 314 | 25 489 | 3 392 | 28 881 |
| Financial income | 36 | 36 | 81 | 81 | ||
| Financial charges | - 302 | - 302 | - 194 | - 194 | ||
| Exchange differences | 3 390 | 3 390 | -1 593 | -1 593 | ||
| Financial result | 3 124 | 3 124 | -1 705 | -1 705 | ||
| Profit before tax | 34 214 | 5 224 | 39 437 | 23 784 | 3 392 | 27 176 |
| Tax expense | -10 741 | -1 061 | -11 803 | -8 191 | - 579 | -8 770 |
| Profit after tax | 23 473 | 4 162 | 27 635 | 15 593 | 2 814 | 18 406 |
| Share of results of associated companies | 6 280 | 672 | 6 952 | 2 179 | 1 223 | 3 402 |
| Result from continuing operations | 29 752 | 4 835 | 34 587 | 17 771 | 4 037 | 21 808 |
| Profit for the period | 29 752 | 4 835 | 34 587 | 17 771 | 4 037 | 21 808 |
| Equity holders of the parent | 28 138 | 4 527 | 32 665 | 17 171 | 3 329 | 20 500 |
* The 2013 comparative figures have been restated due to the equity method consolidation of PT Agro Muko in accordance with the new IFRS 11 standard.
| Consolidated gross profit (before IAS41) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In KUSD (condensed) | 30/06/2014 | % | 30/06/2013* | % | ||
| Palm | 38 463 | 87,3 | 26 321 | 73,2 | ||
| Rubber | 1 936 | 4,4 | 5 166 | 14,4 | ||
| Tea | 136 | 0,3 | 988 | 2,7 | ||
| Bananas and plants | 2 053 | 4,7 | 1 363 | 3,8 | ||
| Corporate and others | 1 450 | 3,3 | 2 132 | 5,9 | ||
| Total | 44 038 | 100,0 | 35 971 | 100,0 |
An adjustment to the international accounting standards concerning the consolidation method of joint ventures has had considerable influence on the incorporation of PT Agro Muko (percentage of control of 47.29% and percentage of interest of 44.93%) in the SIPEF Group. PT Agro Muko must be incorporated according to the equity consolidation method as of 1 January 2014 compared to the proportionate consolidation method last year. This adjustment only has an influence on the presentation of the financial statements and does not affect equity, the profit from the related period and the net result, share of the Group. The comparative figures of the previous year were restated to facilitate the further analysis of the financial statements. Annexe 7 gives a detailed analysis of the impact of the change in consolidation method.
The overall turnover increased with 5.5% as a result of increased turnover in palm oil and bananas (higher volumes and better prices) as well as a smaller turnover for rubber and tea (mainly lower prices).
The unit price of sales, excluding export taxes in Indonesia, decreased considerably (between 6% and 22%) for most of our products and regions, mainly due to higher volumes and a strong devaluation of the local currencies against the USD, compared to the first semester of 2013 (20.0% for the IDR in Indonesia and even 20.4% for the PGK in Papua New Guinea).
The gross profit increased by 22.4%. For palm oil and bananas the gross profit even increased by respectively 46.1% and 50.6% (higher volumes combined with an increased margin), whereas that of rubber decreased by 62.5%. As a result of the sharp drop in the market prices the margin on our tea activities is considerably lower for the first semester of 2014.
Due to the increased selling prices for palm oil the export taxes in Indonesia equally rose as a result of which the SIPEF Group had to pay approximately an additional USD 28/ton for sales from Indonesia in comparison with the first six months of last year (export taxes USD 99/ ton against USD 71/ton in June last year).
The further relatively restricted operating revenues and costs are almost in balance so that the operating result also increased by 22%.
The financial result has been positively influenced by an exchange rate result involving our activities in Papua New Guinea where, due to a government intervention on the foreign exchange markets, the exchange rate evolved very erratically during the first semester (closing rate on 31 December 2013 of 0.3997 PKG/USD, closing rate per 30 June 2014of 0.4134 PGK/USD and average rate during the first six months of 0.3741 PGK/USD).
The actual tax cost is 31.4% pre IAS41 and still 29.9% including IAS41 operations. A detailed analysis of the difference between the theoretical and the actual tax burden is made under 2.2.7.
From 2014 the share of associated companies (KUSD 6 280), also includes besides the historical insurance branch (KUSD 634), PT Agro Muko (KUSD 6 180), Verdant BioScience Singapore (KUSD -319) and PT Timbang Deli (KUSD -215). The strong increase, compared to last year is mainly due to the profitability of PT Agro Muko (larger volumes, higher selling prices and lower costs). The result of PT Agro Muko had a severe negative influence last year due to a provision for a VAT dispute in Indonesia. The insurance branch focuses on the core activities maritime and general risk insurance and provides a stable though limited contribution to the Group's results.
The profit for the period, without taking into account the movements as a result of the IAS41 revisions, is KUSD 29 752 compared to KUSD 17 771 for the first six months of 2013.
The IAS41 revision consists of the replacement of the depreciation costs included in the cost price of sales, through the variation in 'fair value' of the biological assets between the end of 2013 and June 2014, less the plantation costs and related fiscal burdens. The gross variation of biological assets amounted to KUSD 8 591 as a result of the expansion and growing maturity of the recently planted acreage of our oil palm plantation in Hargy Oil Palms Ltd in Papua New Guinea and the general implementation of an increasing long-term margin for palm oil. Plantation costs amounting to KUSD 6 732 reduce the pre-tax net impact to KUSD 5 224 which constitutes the basis for an average deferred tax assessment of 20.3%. Together with the net IAS41 result of the companies, which were included according to the equity method (KUSD 672), the net positive IAS41 impact, share of the Group, is KUSD 4 527.
The net IFRS result, share of the Group, including IAS41 adjustments, is KUSD 28 138 and is 63.9% higher than that of the first semester of last year.
| Consolidated cash flow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| In KUSD (condensed) | 30/06/2014 | 30/06/2013* | ||
| Cash flow from operating activities | 47 080 | 33 831 | ||
| Change in net working capital | 265 | -3 094 | ||
| Income taxes paid | -13 408 | -7 454 | ||
| Cash flow from operating activities after tax | 33 936 | 23 283 | ||
| Acquisitions intangible and tangible assets | -23 696 | -50 846 | ||
| Operating free cash flow | 10 241 | -27 563 | ||
| Dividends received from associated companies | 5 003 | 2 610 | ||
| Proceeds from sale of assets | - 131 | 264 | ||
| Free cash flow | 15 113 | -24 689 | ||
| Equity transactions with non-controlling parties | 0 | 0 | ||
| Net free cash flow | 15 113 | -24 689 |
* The 2013 comparative figures have been restated due to the equity method consolidation of PT Agro Muko in accordance with the new IFRS 11 standard.
| In USD per share | 30/06/2014 | 30/06/2013* |
|---|---|---|
| Weighted average shares outstanding | 8 889 740 | 8 892 064 |
| Basic operating result | 4,08 | 3,25 |
| Basic/Diluted net earnings | 3,67 | 2,31 |
| Cash flow from operating activities after tax | 3,82 | 2,62 |
* The 2013 comparative figures have been restated due to the equity method consolidation of PT Agro Muko in accordance with the new IFRS 11 standard.
In line with the increased profitability, the cash flow produced by operation activities after tax increased with 10 million USD to KUSD 33 936.
The main investments during the first semester concerned the final finishing of two palm oil extraction mills, one in Indonesia and one in Papua New Guinea, payment of additional land compensations and planting of oil palms in the new project in South Sumatra and maintaining the more than 10 000 hectares of young semi-mature plantations.
The 'dividends received from associated enterprises' are dividends the Group has received from PT Agro Muko (KUSD 4 729) and those from the insurance branch (KUSD 273).
The free cash flow generated during the first semester amounted to KUSD 15 113.
| Consolidated statement of financial position | ||
|---|---|---|
| In KUSD (condensed) | 30/06/2014 | 31/12/2013* |
| Biological assets (depreciated costs) | 145 856 | 138 915 |
| Revaluation | 164 649 | 163 022 |
| Biological assets (IAS41) | 310 505 | 301 937 |
| Other fixed assets | 314 016 | 293 078 |
| Net current assets, net of cash | 22 825 | 37 341 |
| Net cash position | -20 093 | -35 077 |
| Total net assets | 627 252 | 600 989 |
| Shareholders' equity, group share | 526 086 | 508 058 |
| Non controlling interest | 34 881 | 33 828 |
| Provisions and deferred tax liabilities | 66 285 | 59 103 |
| Total net liabilities | 627 252 | 600 989 |
* The 2013 comparative figures have been restated due to the equity method consolidation of PT Agro Muko in accordance with the new IFRS 11 standard.
The extended development of the plantations and an increase of the actual value of the existing surface areas of mainly oil palm have led to a further increase in the biological activity, which has now reached KUSD 310 505.
The dividends approved by the shareholders, but paid in July for a total amount of KUSD 15 041 (1.25 per share), reduce the net floating assets.
In line with the positive free cash flow the net cash position improved by KUSD 14 983.
We have noticed that the positive trend for our main products; palm oil and rubber, continues at the beginning of the third quarter and for the time being there are no indications that exceptional weather conditions are likely to disturb this pattern. Of course we can see the impact of the usual seasonal effects on our individual locations, but on the whole we are expecting more favourable production figures than last year.
During July and the first half of August the palm market dropped another USD 100 (and the palm kernel oil market even a shocking USD 300) as a consequence of an expected record soybean production in the United States. Due to perfect growing conditions the expected soy bean yields are almost unbelievably high. We still have a couple of weeks to go before harvesting commences, but this record production will continue to pressure the palm oil market. At the moment the market is trading at its lowest since October 2009.
Despite a current tight stock scenario for palm oil, prices remain weak as production enters its seasonal peak period and, as a result, palm oil stocks will grow. Most bearish factors seem to be priced in. In the second half of this year we will continue to watch whether Indonesia's government will be stronger at enforcing the B10 biodiesel mandate, which so far has been rather disappointing. At current price levels it is definitely beneficial to blend palm methyl esters with gas oil. As we look a little farther into the production cycle we will enter an interesting time at the end of 2014/early 2015, where production could be affected by the dry spell that most growing regions experienced in the first quarter of 2013. Also the development of a mild El Niño could become a market factor. Looking at current levels there seems to be little downside, although the upside seems rather limited as long as the big soybean crop is realized.
The first signs that the Chinese economy has turned the corner with positive PMI growth rates could be the spark that the rubber market has been desperately waiting for. Rubber stocks in China have already decreased by 20%, but this is not yet sufficient. The Thai junta is trying to reduce its stocks by adding rubber to its asphalt, and at the same time trying to stimulate replanting. However, if successful, these factors will only impact the market on medium term. For the time being the market will remain in a narrow trading range, just above the set floor.
Tea prices have increased since the lows of June, ahead of the wintering period in Kenya, and any weather distortion in Kenya will strengthen this movement. Also the Pakistani demand for the winter should be kicking in during the middle of the third quarter, which could further boost tea prices.
Due to bad weather in Columbia and certain areas in Ivory Coast the export for bananas from these countries is temporarily reduced by 25%, whereby the European market is supported in this traditionally calm summer period.
Anticipating the recent price pressure on palm oil markets, we have so far been able to place 79% of the expected volumes of palm oil production at an average of USD 976 per ton CIF Rotterdam, which is USD 59/ton higher than the average selling price realised at the time of publication of last year's half-year figures. 82% of the rubber volumes also sold at an average of USD 2 041 per ton FOB and 65% of the tea volumes sold at USD 2 230 per ton FOB. This is respectively 30.1% and 30.3% lower than the same period last year. This means that we have already tied up a considerable share of our annual income and that in the coming months we will be gradually selling the remaining unsold quantities in the somewhat indecisive markets.
Considering the current favourable production prospects and sales of our products that have already been realised, we are expecting the results for the SIPEF Group for 2014 to be higher than those obtained in 2013.The eventual result will depend on the:
The expected available cash flow must enable us to continue the completion of the limited investment programme for this year and reduce the modest debt burden. As soon as the building of the two new palm oil extraction mills is completed in North Sumatra and Papua New Guinea, management will concentrate initially on the optimisation and replanting of existing projects. In addition, they are also further developing Hargy Oil Palms Ltd, where this year an additional 600 hectares will be planted. New development in South Sumatra will be started on the three nearby locations where 5,000 hectares have already been compensated and 500 hectares have been planted. Over the next few years both activities will absorb most of our investment, in combination with the development of the long-term research project for the development of high-yield palms in North Sumatra.
SIPEF is a Belgian agro-industrial company listed on NYSE Euronext Brussels. The condensed financial statements of the group for the six months ended June 30, 2014 were authorised for issue by the board of directors on August 19, 2014.
This report presents interim condensed consolidated financial statements and has been prepared using accounting policies consistent with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). These financial statements are presented in accordance with International Accounting Standard IAS34, "Interim Financial Reporting". This report should be read in conjunction with SIPEF group's annual financial statements as at December 31, 2013, because the financial statements herein do not include all the information and disclosures required in the annual financial statements. The accounting policies applied are consistent with those applied in SIPEF group's 2013 consolidated financial statements.
SIPEF group did not apply early adoption of any new IFRS standards or interpretations which were issued at the date of authorization of these interim condensed financial statements but not yet effective at the balance sheet date.
The interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been subject to a limited review by our statutory auditor.
The following standards or interpretations are applicable for the accounting year commencing on the 1st of January 2014:
The application of the new IFRS 11 standard has an impact on the consolidation method of the joint venture PT Agro Muko. The Sipef Group has a percentage of interest of 44.93% and a percentage of control of 47.29% in PT Agro Muko. Before the transition to the new IFRS 11 standard, PT Agro Muko was consolidated using the proportionate method. The part of the assets, liabilities, revenues and costs which belonged to the group was included in the consolidated financial statements.
After the application of the new IFRS 11 standard, the Sipef Group has decided to classify PT Agro Muko as a joint-venture in accordance with the new IFRS 11 standard. Therefore, PT Agro Muko is included in the consolidated financial statements using the equity consolidation method. This transition was applied retrospectively. The 2013 comparative trial balances have been restated to take into consideration the new IFRS 11 standard.
The total effect of the restatement is disclosed in Annex 7.
During the course of January 2014, the SIPEF group has acquired 38% of the shares of a newly founded company "Verdant Bioscience Singapore" (VBS). For the acquisition of these shares, the SIPEF group has an obligation of KUSD 5 000 payable to VBS. Furthermore, The SIPEF group has traded all their shares in PT Timbang Deli for the shares of VBS by means of a "share Swap Agreement".
Following this agreement, the company PT Timbang Deli - which was already classified as an asset held for sale in the 2013 consolidated financial statements - was deconsolidated. This transaction was considered a complete sale of PT Timbang Deli.
As of this year, the newly found company VBS is consolidated using the equity method, as the SIPEF group has joint control in VBS.
After this transaction, the SIPEF group still holds - through VBS - a percentage of interest of 36.1% in PT Timbang Deli. PT Timbang Deli is therefore also included in the consolidated financial statements using the equity method. During 2013, the SIPEF group had a percentage of interest of 90.25% in PT Timbang Deli which was then consolidated using the full integration method.
The effects on the consolidated balance sheet, income statement and cash flow of the above mentioned transaction is disclosed in annex 8.
See annex 5.
Due to the application of the new IFRS 11 standard relating to Joint Arrangements and Joint Ventures, PT Agro Muko is included in the consolidated financial statements using the equity consolidation method.
In addition, the subsidiaries Verdant Bioscience Singapore and PT Timbang Deli have also been included in the financial statements using the equity consolidation method (we refer to 2.2.3. consolidation scope).
Therefore an additional disclosure has been added to the consolidated financial statements containing information relating to the associated companies and joint ventures. We refer to annex 6.
On June 11, 2014, SIPEF's shareholders approved the distribution of a EUR 1.25 gross dividend for 2013, payable as from July 2, 2014.
As recorded earlier and as it appears from the table below the average rate of taxation depends to a large extent on the tax impact on variations in the valuation of non-monetary assets in functional currencies (FC) and in local currencies in Indonesia and Papua New Guinea.
| In KUSD | 30/06/2014 | 30/06/2013* |
|---|---|---|
| Result before tax | 39 437 | 27 176 |
| 28,05% | 29,03% | |
| Theoretical tax charge | -11 061 | -7 889 |
| Effect of the remeasurement of Indonesia | -968 | 0 |
| Deferred tax on asset valuation (PGK-EUR/USD) | 1 013 | -4 678 |
| Exchange result PGK-EUR/USD | -666 | 1 010 |
| Impairment/Reversal on deferred tax | -1 289 | 2 501 |
| Other | 1 168 | 286 |
| Tax charge | -11 803 | -8 770 |
| Effective tax rate | 29,93% | 32,27% |
* The 2013 comparative figures have been restated due to the equity method consolidation of PT Agro Muko in accordance with the new IFRS 11 standard.
Applying the principles of IAS12, a net deferred tax asset of KUSD 1 289 has been recorded per June 30, 2014 on tax losses carried forward. Based on the latest available business plan, it is expected that the deferred tax asset will be utilized within the near foreseeable future.
The total tax charge of KUSD 11 803 (KUSD 8 770) can be split into a current tax component of KUSD 5 505 (KUSD 4 949) and a deferred tax component of KUSD 6 298 (KUSD 3 821).
| In KUSD | 30/06/2014 | 31/12/2013* |
|---|---|---|
| Short-term obligations - credit institutions | -60 965 | -52 420 |
| Investments and deposits | 0 | 0 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 40 872 | 17 343 |
| Net financial assets/(liabitlities) | -20 093 | -35 077 |
* The 2013 comparative figures have been restated due to the equity method consolidation of PT Agro Muko in accordance with the new IFRS 11 standard.
The short term obligations have a duration of less than three months and consist of USD straight loans with our bankers of KUSD 37 200 and a commercial paper debt of KUSD 23 765. From the KUSD 40 872 cash and cash equivalents as per June 30, 2014, KUSD 15 041 was distributed on July 2, 2014 as dividend over 2013.
The financial instruments were categorized according to principles that are consistent with those applied for the preparation of note 28 of the 2013 financial statements. No transfer between levels occurred during the first six months of 2014.
All derivatives outstanding per June 30, 2014 measured at fair value relate to forward exchange contracts. The fair value of the forward exchange contracts is calculated as the discounted value of the difference between the contract rate and the current forward rate and is classified as level 2 (fair value determination based on observable inputs). As per June 30, 2014 the fair value amounts to KUSD 45 versus KUSD 986 per December 31, 2013.
The carrying amount of the other financial assets and liabilities approximates the fair value.
There were no changes in transactions with related parties compared to the annual report of December 2013.
See management report.
There are no events after balance sheet date that have a significant impact on the results and/or the shareholders' equity of the group.
In accordance with Article 13 of the Royal Decree of November 14, 2007, SIPEF group states that the fundamental risks confronting the company are unchanged from those described in the 2013 annual report and that no other risks nor uncertainties are expected for the remaining months of the financial year.
On a regular basis, the board of directors and company management evaluate the business risks that confront the SIPEF group.
Baron Bracht, chairman of the board of directors, and François Van Hoydonck, managing director, confirm that to the best of their knowledge:
See annex 9.
Schoten, 19 August 2014.
For more information, please contact:
(section "investor relations")
SIPEF is a Belgian agro-industrial company listed on NYSE Euronext Brussels. The company mainly holds majority stakes in tropical businesses, which it manages and operates. The group is geographically diversified, and produces a number of different commodities, principally palm oil. Its investments are largely ventures in developing countries.
| In KUSD | 30/06/2014 | 31/12/2013* |
|---|---|---|
| Non-current assets | 630 389 | 601 929 |
| Intangible assets | 39 436 | 36 748 |
| Goodwill | 1 348 | 1 348 |
| Biological assets | 310 505 | 301 937 |
| Property, plant & equipment | 192 610 | 187 166 |
| Investment property | 3 | 3 |
| Investments in associates | 76 779 | 63 953 |
| Financial assets | 3 840 | 3 860 |
| Other financial assets | 3 840 | 3 860 |
| Receivables > 1 year | 0 | 0 |
| Other receivables | 0 | 0 |
| Deferred tax assets | 5 868 | 6 914 |
| Current assets | 135 999 | 101 793 |
| Inventories | 36 493 | 31 616 |
| Trade and other receivables | 40 194 | 40 116 |
| Trade receivables | 29 875 | 25 215 |
| Other receivables | 10 319 | 14 901 |
| Current tax receivables | 15 381 | 5 335 |
| Investments | 0 | 0 |
| Other investments and deposits | 0 | 0 |
| Derivatives | 41 | 986 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 40 872 | 17 343 |
| Other current assets | 3 018 | 906 |
| Assets held for sale | 0 | 5 491 |
| Total assets | 766 388 | 703 722 |
| In KUSD | 30/06/2014 | 31/12/2013* |
|---|---|---|
| Total equity | 560 967 | 541 886 |
| Shareholders' equity | 526 086 | 508 058 |
| Issued capital | 45 819 | 45 819 |
| Share premium | 21 502 | 21 502 |
| Treasury shares | -4 776 | -4 776 |
| Reserves | 477 633 | 459 741 |
| Translation differences | -14 092 | -14 228 |
| Non-controlling interests | 34 881 | 33 828 |
| Non-current liabilities | 72 153 | 66 018 |
| Provisions > 1 year | 3 183 | 3 236 |
| Provisions | 3 183 | 3 236 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 58 564 | 53 454 |
| Trade and other liabilities > 1 year | 0 | 0 |
| Financial liabilities > 1 year (incl. derivatives) | 0 | 0 |
| Pension liabilities | 10 406 | 9 327 |
| Current liabilities | 133 268 | 95 818 |
| Trade and other liabilities < 1 year | 68 470 | 38 520 |
| Trade payables | 24 772 | 16 947 |
| Advances received | 1 464 | 144 |
| Other payables | 27 835 | 9 170 |
| Income taxes | 14 399 | 12 258 |
| Financial liabilities < 1 year | 60 965 | 52 420 |
| Current portion of amounts payable after one year | 0 | 0 |
| Financial liabilities | 60 965 | 52 420 |
| Derivatives | 0 | 0 |
| Other current liabilities | 3 832 | 3 099 |
| Liabilities associated with assets held for sale | 0 | 1 780 |
| Total equity and liabilities | 766 388 | 703 722 |
| 30/06/2014 | 30/06/2013* | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In KUSD | Before IAS 41 |
IAS 41 | IFRS | Before IAS 41 |
IAS 41 | IFRS |
| Revenue | 157 702 | 157 702 | 149 498 | 149 498 | ||
| Cost of sales | -113 664 | 3 364 | -110 300 | -113 527 | 2 145 | -111 382 |
| Gross profit | 44 038 | 3 364 | 47 402 | 35 971 | 2 145 | 38 116 |
| Variation biological assets | 8 591 | 8 591 | 14 988 | 14 988 | ||
| Planting cost (net) | -6 732 | -6 732 | -13 741 | -13 741 | ||
| Selling, general and administrative expenses | -13 042 | -13 042 | -12 066 | -12 066 | ||
| Other operating income/(charges) | 94 | 94 | 1 584 | 1 584 | ||
| Operating result | 31 090 | 5 224 | 36 314 | 25 489 | 3 392 | 28 881 |
| Financial income | 36 | 36 | 81 | 81 | ||
| Financial charges | - 302 | - 302 | - 194 | - 194 | ||
| Exchange differences | 3 390 | 3 390 | -1 593 | -1 593 | ||
| Financial result | 3 124 | 3 124 | -1 705 | -1 705 | ||
| Profit before tax | 34 214 | 5 224 | 39 437 | 23 784 | 3 392 | 27 176 |
| Tax expense | -10 741 | -1 061 | -11 803 | -8 191 | - 579 | -8 770 |
| Profit after tax | 23 473 | 4 162 | 27 635 | 15 593 | 2 814 | 18 406 |
| Share of results of associated companies | 6 280 | 672 | 6 952 | 2 179 | 1 223 | 3 402 |
| Result from continuing operations | 29 752 | 4 835 | 34 587 | 17 771 | 4 037 | 21 808 |
| Profit for the period | 29 752 | 4 835 | 34 587 | 17 771 | 4 037 | 21 808 |
| Attributable to: | ||||||
| - Non-controlling interests | 1 615 | 308 | 1 922 | 601 | 708 | 1 308 |
| - Equity holders of the parent | 28 138 | 4 527 | 32 665 | 17 171 | 3 329 | 20 500 |
| Earnings per share ( in USD) | ||||||
| From continuing and discontinued operations | ||||||
| Basic earnings per share | 3,67 | 2,31 |
| Diluted earnings per share | 3,67 | 2,31 |
|---|---|---|
| From continuing operations | ||
| Basic earnings per share | 3,67 | 2,31 |
| Diluted earnings per share | 3,67 | 2,31 |
| 30/06/2014 | 30/06/2013* | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In KUSD | Before IAS 41 |
IAS 41 | IFRS | Before IAS 41 |
IAS 41 | IFRS |
| Profit for the period | 29 752 | 4 835 | 34 587 | 17 771 | 4 037 | 21 808 |
| Other comprehensive income: | ||||||
| Items that may be reclassified to profit and loss in subsequent periods: | ||||||
| - Exchange differences on translating foreign operations | 136 | 136 | - 221 | - 221 | ||
| Items that will not be reclassified to profit and loss in subsequent periods: | ||||||
| - Defined Benefit Plans - IAS 19 Revised | - 475 | - 475 | - 634 | - 634 | ||
| Total other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax: | - 339 | - 339 | - 855 | - 855 | ||
| Other comprehensive income attributable to: | ||||||
| - Non-controlling interests | - 43 | - 43 | - 53 | - 53 | ||
| - Equity holders of the parent | - 296 | - 296 | - 802 | - 802 | ||
| Total comprehensive income for the year | 29 413 | 4 835 | 34 248 | 16 916 | 4 037 | 20 953 |
| Total comprehensive income attributable to: | ||||||
| - Non-controlling interests | 1 572 | 308 | 1 879 | 547 | 708 | 1 255 |
| - Equity holders of the parent | 27 841 | 4 527 | 32 369 | 16 369 | 3 329 | 19 698 |
| In KUSD | 30/06/2014 | 30/06/2013* |
|---|---|---|
| Operating activities | ||
| Result before tax | 39 437 | 27 176 |
| Adjusted for: | ||
| Depreciation | 7 097 | 7 640 |
| Movement in provisions | 470 | 449 |
| Stock options | 212 | 154 |
| Changes in fair value of biological assets | -1 860 | -1 247 |
| Other non-cash results | 2 019 | - 948 |
| Hedge reserves and financial derivatives | 945 | 588 |
| Financial income and charges | 308 | 106 |
| Capital loss on receivables | 0 | 0 |
| Capital gain on sale of investments | 0 | 0 |
| Result on disposal of property, plant and equipment | 165 | - 86 |
| Result on disposal of subsidiaries | -1 714 | 0 |
| Cash flow from operating activities before change in net working capital | 47 080 | 33 831 |
| Change in net working capital | 265 | -3 094 |
| Cash flow from operating activities after change in net working capital | 47 345 | 30 737 |
| Income taxes paid | -13 408 | -7 454 |
| Cash flow from operating activities | 33 936 | 23 283 |
| Investing activities | ||
| Acquisition intangible assets | -2 331 | -5 689 |
| Acquisition biological assets | -7 079 | -13 478 |
| Acquisition property, plant & equipment | -14 285 | -31 679 |
| Acquisition investment property | 0 | 0 |
| Acquisition financial assets | 0 | 0 |
| Dividends received from associated companies | 5 003 | 2 610 |
| Proceeds from sale of property, plant & equipment | 251 | 264 |
| Proceeds from sale of subsidiaries | - 382 | 0 |
| Cash flow from investing activities | -18 824 | -47 972 |
| Free cash flow | 15 113 | -24 689 |
| Financing activities | ||
| Equity transactions with non-controlling parties | 0 | 0 |
| Increase/(decrease) in long-term financial borrowings | 0 | 0 |
| Increase/(decrease) short-term financial borrowings | 8 546 | 36 535 |
| Last year's dividend paid during this bookyear | 0 | 0 |
| Dividends paid by subsidiaries to minorities | - 215 | 0 |
| Financial income and charges | - 296 | - 159 |
| Cash flow from financing activities | 8 035 | 36 375 |
| Net increase in investments, cash and cash equivalents | 23 147 | 11 687 |
| Investments and cash and cash equivalents (opening balance) | 17 726 | 25 424 |
| Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash and cash equivalents | - 1 | - 1 |
| Investments and cash and cash equivalents (closing balance) | 40 872 | 37 109 |
| In KUSD | Issued capital SIPEF |
Share premium SIPEF |
Treasury shares |
Defined benefit plans - OCI - IAS 19R |
Reserves | Translation differences |
Share holders' equity |
Non controlling interests |
Total equity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| January 1, 2014 | 45 819 | 21 502 | -4 776 | - 895 | 460 636 | -14 228 | 508 058 | 33 828 | 541 886 |
| Result for the period | 32 665 | 32 665 | 1 922 | 34 587 | |||||
| Other comprehensive income | - 432 | 136 | - 297 | - 41 | - 337 | ||||
| Total comprehensive income | 0 | 0 | 0 | - 432 | 32 665 | 136 | 32 368 | 1 882 | 34 250 |
| Last year's dividend paid | -15 041 | -15 041 | - 215 | -15 256 | |||||
| Equity transactions with non-controlling parties |
0 | 0 | |||||||
| Transfers without loss of control | 0 | 0 | |||||||
| Other | 701 | 701 | - 614 | 87 | |||||
| June 30, 2014 | 45 819 | 21 502 | -4 776 | -1 327 | 478 960 | -14 092 | 526 086 | 34 881 | 560 967 |
| January 1, 2013* | 45 819 | 21 502 | -4 603 | 0 | 424 836 | -14 912 | 472 642 | 31 848 | 504 490 |
| Result for the period | 20 500 | 20 500 | 1 308 | 21 808 | |||||
| Other comprehensive income | - 581 | - 221 | - 802 | - 53 | - 855 | ||||
| Total comprehensive income | 0 | 0 | 0 | - 581 | 20 500 | - 221 | 19 698 | 1 255 | 20 953 |
| Last year's dividend paid | -20 121 | -20 121 | -20 121 | ||||||
| Equity transactions with non-controlling parties |
0 | 0 | |||||||
| Transfers without loss of control | 0 | 0 | |||||||
| Other | 154 | 154 | 154 | ||||||
| June 30, 2013 | 45 819 | 21 502 | -4 603 | - 581 | 425 369 | -15 133 | 472 373 | 33 102 | 505 476 |
Segment reporting is based on two segment reporting formats. The primary reporting format represents business segments – palm products, rubber, tea, bananas and plants and insurance – which represent the management structure of the group.
The secondary reporting format represents the geographical locations where the group is active. Gross profit per geographical market shows revenue minus cost of sales based on the location where the enterprise's products are produced.
Segment result is revenue minus expense that is directly attributable to the segment and the relevant portion of income and expense that can be allocated on a reasonable basis to the segment.
| Revenue | Cost of sales |
Gross profit before IAS 41 |
IAS 41 | Gross profit IFRS |
% of total |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 - KUSD | ||||||
| Palm | 129 321 | -90 859 | 38 463 | 2 139 | 40 602 | 85.6 |
| Rubber | 13 619 | -11 683 | 1 936 | 320 | 2 256 | 4.8 |
| Tea | 3 178 | -3 041 | 136 | 32 | 169 | 0.4 |
| Bananas and plants | 10 073 | -8 020 | 2 053 | 872 | 2 925 | 6.2 |
| Corporate | 1 440 | 0 | 1 440 | 0 | 1 440 | 3.0 |
| Others | 71 | - 61 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0.0 |
| Total | 157 702 | -113 664 | 44 038 | 3 364 | 47 402 | 100.0 |
| 2013 - KUSD* | ||||||
| Palm | 116 718 | -90 397 | 26 321 | 1 522 | 27 843 | 73.1 |
| Rubber | 17 232 | -12 066 | 5 166 | 168 | 5 334 | 14.0 |
| Tea | 3 955 | -2 967 | 988 | 14 | 1 002 | 2.6 |
| Bananas and plants | 9 631 | -8 268 | 1 363 | 441 | 1 804 | 4.7 |
| Corporate | 2 113 | 0 | 2 113 | 0 | 2 113 | 5.5 |
| Others | 150 | - 130 | 20 | 0 | 20 | 0.1 |
The segment "corporate" comprises the management fees received from non group entities. Under IFRS (IAS 41) depreciation on biological assets is not allowed.
| Revenu | Cost of sales |
Other income |
Gross profit before IAS 41 |
IAS 41 | Gross profit IFRS |
% of total |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 - KUSD | |||||||
| Indonesia | 86 565 | -64 680 | 298 | 22 183 | 1 246 | 23 430 | 49.4 |
| Papua New Guinea | 59 552 | -40 902 | 0 | 18 650 | 1 245 | 19 895 | 42.0 |
| Ivory Coast | 10 073 | -8 020 | 0 | 2 053 | 872 | 2 925 | 6.2 |
| Europe | 0 | 0 | 1 142 | 1 142 | 0 | 1 142 | 2.4 |
| Others | 71 | - 61 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0.0 |
| Total | 156 262 | -113 664 | 1 440 | 44 038 | 3 364 | 47 402 | 100.0 |
| 2013 - KUSD* | |||||||
| Indonesia | 77 543 | -58 024 | 276 | 19 795 | 940 | 20 735 | 54.4 |
| Papua New Guinea | 60 447 | -46 912 | 0 | 13 535 | 764 | 14 299 | 37.5 |
| Ivory Coast | 9 631 | -8 268 | 0 | 1 363 | 441 | 1 804 | 4.7 |
| Europe | 0 | 0 | 1 254 | 1 254 | 0 | 1 254 | 3.3 |
| Others | 347 | - 323 | 0 | 24 | 0 | 24 | 0.1 |
| Total | 147 968 | -113 527 | 1 530 | 35 971 | 2 145 | 38 116 | 100.0 |
Additional information relating to the associated companies is shown below. None of the associated companies are listed.
The below information represents 100% of the companies. The share of the group is shown at the bottom.
| 2014 - KUSD | PT Agro Muko | PT Timbang Deli | Verdant Bioscience Singapore |
Insurance (BDM NV and ASCO NV) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Included in the consolidation | 47.29% | 36.10% | 38.00% | 50.00% |
| Turnover | 36 967 | 1 364 | 0 | 3 547 |
| Net result before IAS 41 | 13 069 | 197 | - 840 | 1 267 |
| IAS 41 | 1 384 | 50 | 0 | 0 |
| IFRS | 14 453 | 247 | - 840 | 1 267 |
| Consolidated part | 6 835 | 89 | - 319 | 634 |
| Non-recurring charges - historical currency translation adjustment after loss of control |
0 | -286 | 0 | 0 |
| Total part of the group | 6 493 | -197 | - 319 | 634 |
| Part of minorities | 342 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 835 | -197 | - 319 | 634 |
The non-recurring charges relate to the Currency Translation adjustments (CTA) in PT Timbang Deli which have been taken into costs following the loss of control after the "Share Swap Agreement" with Verdant Bioscience Singapore. The effect of the historical CTA reversal is non-recurring and is completely attributable to the group.
| 2014 - KUSD | PT Agro Muko | PT Timbang Deli | Verdant Biosci ence Singapore |
Insurance (BDM NV and ASCO NV) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biological assets | 70 629 | 4 213 | 0 | 0 |
| Other non-current assets | 32 287 | 1 503 | 23 274 | 50 106 |
| Current assets | 38 531 | 1 508 | 5 003 | 46 570 |
| Total assets | 141 446 | 7 224 | 28 277 | 96 676 |
| Non-current liabilities | 19 653 | 1 232 | 0 | 31 953 |
| Current liabilities | 8 367 | 921 | 843 | 42 809 |
| Equity | 113 427 | 5 071 | 27 433 | 21 914 |
| Total equity and liabilities | 141 446 | 7 224 | 28 277 | 96 676 |
The following standards or interpretations are applicable for the accounting year commencing on the 1st of January 2014:
IFRS 11 "Joint Arrangements" and IAS 28 "Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures"
The application of the new IFRS 11 standard has an impact on the consolidation method of the joint venture PT Agro Muko. The SIPEF Group has a percentage of interest of 44.93% and a percentage of control of 47.29% in PT Agro Muko. Before the transition to the new IFRS 11 standard, PT Agro Muko was consolidated using the proportionate method. The part of the assets, liabilities, revenues and costs which belonged to the group was included in the consolidated financial statements.
After the application of the new IFRS 11 standard the SIPEF Group has decided to classify PT Agro Muko as a joint-venture in accordance with the new IFRS 11 standard. Therefore, PT Agro Muko is included in the consolidated financial statements using the equity consolidation method. This transition was applied retrospectively. The 2013 comparative trial balances have been restated to take into consideration the new IFRS 11 standard. The effect can be summarized as follows:
| Proportionate method | Equity Method | Difference | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In KUSD (verkort) | 30 June 2013 | 30 June 2013 | 30 June 2013 | ||||||
| Before IAS41 |
IAS41 | IFRS | Before IAS41 |
IAS41 | IFRS | Before IAS41 |
IAS41 | IFRS | |
| Gross Sales | 151 960 | 151 960 | 149 498 | 149 498 | -2 461 | -2 461 | |||
| Cost of Sales | -110 322 | 2 378 | -107 944 | -113 527 | 2 145 | -111 382 | -3 206 | -233 | -3 438 |
| Gross Margin | 41 638 | 2 378 | 44 016 | 35 971 | 2 145 | 38 116 | -5 667 | -233 | -5 900 |
| Variation Biological assets | 17 246 | 17 246 | 14 988 | 14 988 | -2 258 | -2 258 | |||
| Planting costs (net) | -14 601 | -14 601 | -13 741 | -13 741 | 860 | 860 | |||
| Selling general and admin expenses | -12 159 | -12 159 | -12 066 | -12 066 | 92 | 92 | |||
| Other operating income/charges | -1 078 | -1 078 | 1 584 | 1 584 | 2 662 | 2 662 | |||
| Operating Result | 28 401 | 5 023 | 33 425 | 25 489 | 3 392 | 28 881 | -2 913 | -1 631 | -4 544 |
| Financial Income | 88 | 88 | 81 | 81 | -6 | -6 | |||
| Financial costs | -194 | -194 | -194 | -194 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Exchange variances | -1 606 | -1 606 | -1 593 | -1 593 | 13 | 13 | |||
| Financial Result | -1 712 | -1 712 | -1 705 | -1 705 | 7 | 7 | |||
| Profit/Loss before tax | 26 689 | 5 023 | 31 712 | 23 784 | 3 392 | 27 176 | -2 905 | -1 631 | -4 536 |
| Tax | -9 146 | -986 | -10 132 | -8 191 | -579 | -8 770 | 955 | 407 | 1 362 |
| Profit/Loss after tax | 17 543 | 4 037 | 21 580 | 15 593 | 2 814 | 18 406 | -1 951 | -1 223 | -3 173 |
| Share of results of associated companies | 228 | 0 | 228 | 2 179 | 1 223 | 3 401 | 1 951 | 1 223 | 3 173 |
| Profit for the Period (continuing operations) | 17 771 | 4 037 | 21 808 | 17 771 | 4 037 | 21 808 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Profit for the Period (incl discontinued operations) | 17 771 | 4 037 | 21 808 | 17 771 | 4 037 | 21 808 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| - Non controlling interests | 600 | 708 | 1 308 | 600 | 708 | 1 308 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| - Equity holders of the parent | 17 171 | 3 329 | 20 500 | 17 171 | 3 329 | 20 500 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 December 2013 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| in KUSD (condensed) | Proportionate method |
Equity method | Difference |
| Balance sheet | |||
| Tangible and intangible assets | 242 754 | 225 265 | -17 489 |
| Biological assets | 334 712 | 301 937 | -32 775 |
| Investments in associates | 10 696 | 63 953 | 53 257 |
| Financial assets | 3 860 | 3 860 | 0 |
| Deferred tax assets | 6 914 | 6 914 | 0 |
| Total non-current assets | 598 936 | 601 930 | 2 993 |
| Inventories | 36 749 | 31 616 | -5 133 |
| Receivables | 46 394 | 45 451 | -943 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 21 488 | 18 329 | -3 159 |
| Other current assets | 1 037 | 906 | -131 |
| Assets held for sale | 5 491 | 5 491 | 0 |
| Total current Assets | 111 159 | 101 793 | -9 366 |
| Total assets | 710 095 | 703 722 | -6 373 |
| Provisions | 5 248 | 3 236 | -2 012 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 58 594 | 53 454 | -5 140 |
| Pension liabilities | 11 122 | 9 327 | -1 795 |
| Trade liabilities | 35 684 | 38 520 | 2 836 |
| Financial liabilities < 1 year | 52 420 | 52 420 | 0 |
| Other current liabilities | 3 361 | 3 099 | -262 |
| Liabilities associated with assets held for sale | 1 780 | 1 780 | 0 |
| Total liabilities | 168 209 | 161 835 | -6 373 |
| (Net impact on) equity | |||
| Attributable to: | |||
| - Non-controlling interests | 33 828 | 33 828 | 0 |
| - Equity holders of the parent | 508 058 | 508 058 | 0 |
| 30 June 2013 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In KUSD (condensed) | Proportionate method |
Equity method | Difference | |||
| Cash flow | ||||||
| Cash flow from operating activities | 40 116 | 33 831 | -6 284 | |||
| Change in net working capital | -2 019 | -3 094 | -1 075 | |||
| Income taxes paid | -10 345 | -7 454 | 2 891 | |||
| Cash flow from operating activities after tax | 27 752 | 23 283 | -4 468 | |||
| Acquisitions intangible and tangible assets | -52 472 | -50 846 | 1 626 | |||
| Acquisitions financial assets | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Operating free cash flow | -24 721 | -27 563 | -2 841 | |||
| Dividends received from associated companies | 262 | 2 610 | 2 348 | |||
| Proceeds from sale of assets | 264 | 264 | 0 | |||
| Free cash flow | -24 195 | -24 689 | -493 | |||
| Equity transactions with non-controlling parties | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Decrease/(increase) of treasury shares | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Net free cash flow | -24 195 | -24 689 | -493 |
During the course of January 2014, the SIPEF group has acquired 38% of the shares of a newly founded company "Verdant Bioscience Singapore" (VBS). For the acquisition of these shares, the SIPEF group has taken on an obligation of 5 000 KUSD payable to VBS. Furthermore, The SIPEF group has traded all their shares in PT Timbang Deli for the shares of VBS by means of a "share Swap Agreement".
Following this agreement, the company PT Timbang Deli, which was already classified as an asset held for sale in the 2013 consolidated financial statements, was deconsolidated. This transaction was considered a complete sale of PT Timbang Deli.
As of this year, the newly found company VBS is consolidated using the equity method, seeing as the SIPEF group has joint control in VBS.
After this transaction, the SIPEF group still holds - through VBS - a percentage of interest of 36.1% in PT Timbang Deli. PT Timbang Deli is therefore also included in the consolidated financial statements using the equity method. During 2013, the SIPEF group had a percentage of interest of 90.25% in PT Timbang Deli. PT Timbang Deli was then consolidated using the full integration method.
The above mentionned transaction had the following effects on the balance sheet, the income statement and the cash flow:
| 2014 - KUSD | Total |
|---|---|
| Investments in associates | 10 744 |
| Other current assets | -445 |
| Assets held for sale | -5 109 |
| Assets held for sale: cash and cash equivalents | -382 |
| Total assets | 4 809 |
| Minority interests | -125 |
| Curreny translation adjustment | 286 |
| Liabilities associated with assets held for sale | -1 780 |
| Other liabilities | 5 000 |
| Total liabilities | 3 381 |
| Sales price (+) / purchase price (-) | 0 |
| Result on disposal of financial assets | 1 714 |
| Non-recurring costs in the share of results of associated companies | -286 |
| Total result of the sale | 1 428 |
| Net cash received (+) / payed (-) | -382 |
The net cash paid related to the cash included in the company PT Timbang Deli as at December 31, 2013 The cash was already included in assets held for sales and has left the SIPEF group after the sale of PT Timbang Deli.
Building tools?
Free accounts include 100 API calls/year for testing.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.