Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

Shalimar Paints Ltd. Capital/Financing Update 2020

Nov 10, 2020

62395_rns_2020-11-10_c6d13745-5792-46fc-8604-295d3adfc92b.pdf

Capital/Financing Update

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

SHALIMAR
PAINTS
November
2020
10,
The Secretary Department
Listing
Limited
BSE
Exchange
National
Stock
of India
Ltd.
Department
Corporate
Relationship
Exchange
Plaza,
se
Floor,
Phiroze Jeejeebhoy Towers G-Block
Plot
No.,
C/1,
25th
Street
Floor,
Dalal
Bandra
Complex,
Bandra
Kurla
Mumbai-
400001
Mumbai- 400051

Reference Scrip Code- NSE-SHALPAINTS, BSE-509874

Subject- Submission of Report of Monitoring Agency

Dear Sir/Madam,

Please find enclosed report of Monitoring Agency given by State Bank of India, Industrial Finance Branch 102 Natraj, 194, Sir, M.V Road, W.E Highway- Metro Junction, Andheri (E) Mumbai-400069, along with the Board Comments on the same.

We request you to kindly take the same on records and acknowledge the receipt.

This is for your information and records.

Thanking you For Shalimar Paints Limited

-

Ashish Kumar Bagri Chief Financial Officer

, Shalimar Paints Ltd. | Corporate Office : ist Floor, Plot No. 28, Sector 32, Gurugram 122001, Haryana SHALIMAR | Regd. Office: Stainless Centre, 4th Floor, Plot No. 50, Sector- 32, Gurugram-122001, Haryana [India) PAINTS | Bs +91 124 461 6600 Fs +91 124 461 6659 | E: [email protected] | www.shalimarpaints.com | CIN: L24222HR1902PLC065611

STATE BANK OF INDIA

Shalimar Paints Limited, Stainless Steel Centre, 44 floor, Plot No -50, Sector 32, Gurgaon -122 001

SBIIFB AND/AGM&RM/AMT-IV/2012-21/166 Date: 31.10.2020

Dear Sir,

SHALIMAR PAINTS LIMITED REPORT OF THE MONITORING AGENCY.

With reference to above please find enclosed report of the monitoring agency as on 30.09.2020 for the Rights Issue proceeds in the prescribed format.

Yours faithfully,

pen & Relationship Manager

@ bank.sbi t & 491 22 2681 9700 ater faa prrzat, ate, aiteifire faa erat, ath Industrial Finance Branch, Andheri,

+91 22 2682 3370 / 2682 1310 102, AEC, 194, Wt Tat. Het, 102, Hea, 194, Hew a 102, Natraj, 194, Sir M.V. Road, Hh +91 22 2683 3001 / 2683 1648 1g. ant-dal stag, art cad), Tz ahaa deer, th (DD, W.E. Highway-Metro Junction,

[email protected] HS fae - - 400 069. yad each - 400 069. Andheri {E), Mumbai - 400 069.

SCHEDULE XI - FORMAT OF REPORT TO BE SUBMITTED BY THE MONITORING AGENCY [See regulation 82(2) and 82(3)]

Report of the Monitoring Agency Name of the issuer: Shalimar Paints Limited

For quarter ended: September 30" 2020.

Name of the Monitoring Agency: State Bank of india, Industrial Financial Branch, Andheri East, Mumbai- 400069

{a) Deviation from the objects: Due to lower Subscription of 92.28% in the Rights Issue, the proceeds from the Rights Issue amounted to Rs. 20,087.24 Lakhs instead of Rs. 21,767.15 Lakhs as per the Letter of Offer. Accordingly, the amount allocated in some of the Objects has been modified. In view of additional Working Capital requirement, there is increase in the allocation of funds towards Long Term Working Capital Requirement — The major Object of the Issue. Further, the same is adjusted through reduction in estimated cost of Setting up of Paints manufacturing plant at Nashik including Regional Distribution Centre (RDC) at Nashik.

(b) Range of Deviation*: The Company received Rs. 20,087.24 Lakhs from the proceeds of the Rights Issue ia view of lower subscription instead of Rs. 21,767.15 Lakhs. Accordingly, the amount allocated in some of the Objects was modified. Further, in view of additional Working Capital requirements and reduction in estimated cost of Setting up of Paints manufacturing plant at Nashik including Regional Distribution Centre (RDC) at Nashik, the utilisation for Long Term Working Capital has increased by 3.21%.

Declaration:

We declare that this report is based on the format prescribed by the SEBI (CDR) Regulations, 2018, We further declare that this report provides a true and fair view of the utilization of the issue procecds.

We declare that we do not have any directfindirect interest in or relationship with the issuer/promoters/ directorsémanagement and also confirm that we do not perceive any conflict of interest in' such relationshipfateres( while monitoring and reporting the utilization of the issue proceeds by the issuer. However, we are one af the Bankers to the Company and have extended C rea LPR BRR RE Tap ida

Signature:

| Date: [31.10.2020] Name and designation of the Authorized Signatory: Mr Satyendra Kumar Designation of Authorized person/Signing Authority: AGM & RM Seal of the Monitoring Agency:

For TN oie OF INDIA WAr,

BERS Hea | ASS. Gen. Manager ohelifra fred amar, eet (q), dad - ae. ind. Finance Br. Andheri (E), Mumbai - 69.

1) Issuer Details:

Name of the issuer : Shalimar Paints Limited

Names of the promoter : Mr. Ratan Jindal and Hind Strategic Investments

2} 'Issue Details

3) Details of the arrangement made to ensure the

monitoring of issue proceeds:

1) Issuer Details:
Name of the issuer : Shalimar Paints Limited
Names of the promoter : Mr. Ratan Jindal and Hind
Strategic Investments
which
Industry/sector
belongs:
to
it
Coatings
Paint &
'Issue Details
2}
2018 Issue Period : December 03, 2018 to December 24,
Type of issue (public/rights) : Rights Issue
Type of specified securities : Equity Shares of the
Cempany
IPO Grading, if any : Not applicable
Issue size (Rs, In Lacs) : Rs.21,767.15 Lakhs (Final
Figure of Subscription was Rs. 20,087.24 Lakhs)
Details
3)
arrangement
made
the
of
monitoring of issue proceeds:
ensure
to
the
(Give item by item description for all the objects stated
in the offer document separately in following format}
Particulars Reply Comments of the Comments the
Monitoring Agency Board of
Directors
Whether all utilization is as per the disclosures in Yes/
the Offer Document? No
Whether shareholder approval has been obtained Yes/
in case of material deviations# from expenditures No
disclosed in the Offer Document?
objects of the issue has changed? Whether the means of finance for the disclosed Yes/
No
Is there any major deviation observed over the Yes/
earlier monitoring agency reports? No
Whether all Government/statutory approvals Yes/
related to the object(s) have been obtained? No
Whether all arrangements pertaining to technical Yes/ 3
assistance/collaboration are in operation? No
Are there any favorable events improving the Yes/
viability of these object(s)? No
viability of the object(s)? Are there any unfavorable events affecting the Yes/
Is there any other relevant information that may Yes/
materially affect the decision making of the i No
i
: i

However, the utilization in different heads of the Objects of the Issue had to be modified in view of lesser hily 2 proceeds collected in the Rights Issue due to lower subscription to the extent of 92.28% and as well as shig changed requirement in various heads.

*Where material deviation may be defined to mean:

(a) Deviation in the objects or purposes for which the funds have been raised

(b) Deviation in the amount of funds actually utilized by more than 10% of the amount projected in the offer documents.

4) Details of object(s) to be monitored:

Give Item by Item Description for all the Objects Stated in Offer Document separately in following format) (Rs, In Lacs)
Comments of the Board of Directors
$\tilde{z}$
si,
Item Head (as per the Offer
Original Cost
Document)
Revised Cost * Comments of the Monitoring Agency Proposed
financing
option
Reason of
revision
cost
Particulars of
arrangements
made
$f_{\text{lim}}$
$\frac{1}{2}$ Reinstatement of paint
manufacturing plant at
Project of
Nashik
ç,
5.152.1
5152.13 Revised to
5075.78 Lacs
No significant Change
Setting up of Regional
2(b) Distribution Centre
RDC) at Nashik
340,00 340 (Revised to
40.00)
The revised cost of smaller RDC would be Rs. 40
Lacs.
ŕ۱ Capital Requirements
Long Term Working
13,500.00 12,187.80 (Further
Revised to
12,564.15
after allotment in the Rights Issue. Further, to meet
the additional Working Capital Requirement, the
In view of Lower Subscription at 92.28% in the
Rights Issue, the amount allocated was reduced
Requirements has been increased by Rs.376.35
allocation for Long Term Working Capital
Lakhs to Rs. 12,564.15 Lakhs
ò, $\frac{1}{2}$
General Corporate
purposes
3.782.75 3,415.07 In view of Lower Subscription at 92.28% in the
Rights Issue, the amount allocated was reduced
after allotment in the Rights Issue
4 Expenses for the issue 92.00 92.00 No Change in Proposed cost
Total 22,866.88 21,186.99
* Including Rs.20087.26 Lakhs from Rights Issue proceeds and Rs. 1099.73 lakhs received as Insurance claim for Nashik Plant.

$\ddot{\phantom{0}}$

(i) Cost of object(s)

$\tilde{\tilde{\mathbf{z}}}$

$\overline{\phantom{a}}$

AMI i

$\bar{\beta}$

$\omega$

Regional Distribution
Capital Requirements
Long Term Working
paint manufacturing
General Corporate
Reinstatement of
Item Head
Centre (RDC) at
plant at Nashik
Setting up of
Project of
purposes
Nashik
$I$ (a)
2(b)
$\frac{3}{2}$
ż.
Ō1
er,
Offer Document (
proposed in the
Amount as
Revised)*
Amount utilized till September 30, 2020 the Board of
Directors
As at beginning of the
quarter (Including
Insurance claim
proceeds)
During the
quarter
At the end of
the quarter
unutilized
amount
Total
Monitoring Agency
Comments of the
5152.13 Revised
to 5075.78 Lacs
4.840.24 4,840.24 235.54 Utilisation as disclosed
in Letter of Offer $#$
340 (Revised to
40.00
$\begin{array}{c} \vdots \ \vdots \ \end{array}$
40.00
$\frac{1}{2}$
40.00 As per the revised cost
given Cost of
$Obiect(S)$ #
(Further Revised
to 12,564.15)
12.187.80
12.564.15 12,564.15 $\mathfrak{r}$ 13,500.00 Lakhs to Rs.
Modification from Rs.
Further revised to Rs.
12,187.80 Lakhs*
12564.15 Lakhs
3,415.07 3.415.07 3.415.07 $\mathbf{I}$ Modification from Rs.
3.782.75 Lakhs to Rs.
3,415.07 Lakhs.
Expenses for the
issue
44
92.00 92.00 92.00 $\mathbf{I}$ Utilisation as disclosed
in Letter of Offer
Total $\begin{array}{cccc}\n\bullet & \bullet & \bullet & \bullet & \bullet & \bullet & \bullet & \bullet & \bullet & \bullet & \bullet & \bullet & \bullet & \bullet$
21,186.99
20,951.46 $\pmb{\mathfrak{t}}$ 20,951.46 235.54

(ii) Progress in the object(s) -

$\frac{1}{2}$

l,

* In view of Lower Subscription in the Rights Issue, the amount allocated to the Objects were reduced.

As on September 30, 2020. Rs. 235.54 Lakhs are outstanding which are being paid to vendors of Project.

SProvide following details under Item Head: (a) Name of the object(s):

(b) Brief description of the object(s):

(c) Location of the object(s) (if applicable):
(iii) Deployment of unatilixed IPO proceeds:

(Rs. In Lacs) Return on Investment Market Value as at the end of
$quarter$ *
235.54 235.54
(%)
arning $\frac{A}{A}$
Aaturity
date
$\frac{1}{2}$
nvested
Amount
235.54 235.54
ì Type of instrument and name of the entity
1000年的1000年的1000年的1000年的1000年的1000年的1000年的1000年的1000年的1000年的1000年的1000年的1000年的1000年的1000年的1000年的1000
i invested in

ત્ર્
::::::
Ĭ
.
Balance with Bank
$\begin{array}{cccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc$
Total Available balance
iii) Deployment of unutilised IPO proceeds:

Ę $\overline{L}$ $\cdots$ $\mathbf{H}$ $\star$ m/f

where the matrixet value is not feasinte, provide matrixed values found the same " " " " " " " " " "
$(iv)$ Delay in implementation of the object(s) (Rs, In Lacs)
Completion Date Delay Comments of the Board of Directors
Object(s) per the Offer
Document
ÅS
Actual* months)
(no. of days/
Reason of delay course of action
Proposed
Project of Reinstatement of paint
manufacturing plant at Nashik
$31 - 03 - 2019$ Completed in May 2019
commercial production
started in August 2019
2 Month
Setting up of Regional Distribution
Centre (RDC) at Nashik
31-03-2019 Completed in March 2020 12 Month
Long Term Working Capital
Requirements
31-03-2019 Completed
General Corporate purposes $31 - 03 - 2019$ Completed
Expenses for the issue $31 - 03 - 2019$ Completed

* In case of continuing object(s), please specify latest/revised estimate of the completion date.

$\mathfrak{g}$

1) Issuer Details:

Name of the issuer : Shalimar Paints Limited Names of the promoter : Mr. Ratan Jindal and Hind Strategic Investments Industry/sector to which Coatings it belongs: Paint &

2) Issue Details

3) Details of the arrangement made to ensure the monitoring of issue proceeds:

SHALIMAR
PAINTS
Details of the arrangement made to ensure the monitoring of issue proceeds:
(Give item by item description for all the objects stated in the offer document separately in following
format)
Issuer Details:
1)
Name of the issuer : Shalimar Paints Limited
Names of the promoter : Mr. Ratan Jindal and Hind
Strategic Investments
which
Industry/sector
belongs:
to
it
Coatings
Issue Details
Paint &
2)
Issue Period : December 03, 2018 to December 24,
2018
Type of issue (public/rights) : Rights Issue
Type of specified securities : Equity Shares of the
Company
IPO Grading, if any : Not applicable
Issue size (Rs, In Lacs) : Rs.21,767.15 Lakhs (Final
Figure of Subscription was Rs. 20,087.24 Lakhs)
arrangement
made
Details
the
of
3)
monitoring of issue proceeds:
(Give item by item description for all the objects stated
in the offer document separately in following format)
ensure
to
the
Particulars Reply Comments of the
Monitoring Agency
Comments the
Board of
Directors
Whether all utilization is as per the disclosures in Yes/
the Offer Document?
No Yes# Yes#
Whether shareholder approval has been obtained Yes/
in case of material deviations# from expenditures No
disclosed in the Offer Document?
No No
Whether the means of finance for the disclosed
objects of the issue has changed?
Yes/
No
No No.
Is there any major deviation observed over the
earlier monitoring agency reports?
Yes/
No
No No
Whether all Government/statutory approvals
related to the object(s) have been obtained?
Yes/
No
Yes Yes
Whether all arrangements pertaining to technical Yes/
assistance/collaboration are in operation?
No Yes Yes
Are there any favorable events improving the
viability of these object(s)?
Yes/
No
Yes Yes
Are there any unfavorable events affecting the
viability of the object(s)?
Yes/
No
No No
Is there any other relevant information that may
materially affect the decision making of the
investors?
Yes/
No
No No

fl }

However, the utilization in different heads of the Objects of the Issue had to be modified in view of lesser proceeds collected in the Rights Issue due to lower subscription to the extent of 92.28% and as well as slightly changed requirement in various heads.

*Where material deviation may be defined to mean:

(a) Deviation in the objects or purposes for which the funds have been raised

(b) Deviation in the amount of funds actually utilized by more than 10% of the amount projected in the offer documents.

4) Details of object(s) to be monitored:
(i) Cost of object(s)

Particulars of
arrangements
made
firm
$\overline{N}$ $\stackrel{\triangle}{\geq}$ $\stackrel{\triangle}{\scriptstyle\sim}$ NA $\overline{M}$
Rs. In Lacs Proposed
financing
option
No NA NA NA NA
Comments of the Board of Directors Reason of cost revision No significant Change Smaller Regional Distribution
Centre (RDC) has been setup.
Requirement, the allocation for
In view of Lower Subscription
the additional Working Capital
increased by Rs.376.35 Lakhs
at 92.28% in the Rights Issue,
reduced after allotment in the
Rights Issue. Further, to meet
Long Term Working Capital
the amount allocated was
to Rs. 12,564.15 Lakhs
Requirements has been
In view of Lower Subscription
at 92.28% in the Rights Issue,
reduced after allotment in the
the amount allocated was
Rights Issue
NA
ed in Offer Document separately in following format) Comments of the Monitoring Agency No significant Change The revised cost of smaller RDC would
be Rs. 40 Lacs.
allocated was reduced after allotment in
92.28% in the Rights Issue, the amount
has been increased by Rs.376.35 Lakhs
Term Working Capital Requirements
Requirement, the allocation for Long
the Rights Issue. Further, to meet the
In view of Lower Subscription at
additional Working Capital
to Rs. 12,564.15 Lakhs
92.28% in the Rights Issue, the amount
allocated was reduced after allotment in
In view of Lower Subscription at
the Rights Issue
No Change in Proposed cost
Revised Cost * 5152.13 Revised
to 5075.78 Lacs
340 (Revised to
40.00)
(Further Revised
to 12,564.15)
12,187.80
3,415.07 92.00 186.99
21.
(Give Item by Item Description for all the Objects Stat (as per the Offer
Original Cost
Document)
5,152.13 340.00 13,500.00 3,782.75 92.00 22.866.88
Item Head Reinstatement of
plant at Nashik
manufacturing
Project of
paint
Distribution Centre
RDC) at Nashik
Setting up of
Regional
Working Capital
Requirements
Long Term
General Corporate
purposes
Expenses for the
issue
T ofa
$\geq$
$\overline{S}$ .
1(a) 2(b) 2 3 4

$\infty$

* Including Rs.20087.26 Lakhs from Rights Issue proceeds and Rs. 1099.73 lakhs received as Insurance claim for Nashik Plant.

As on September 30, 2020, Rs. 235.54 Lakhs are outstanding which are being paid to vendors of Project.
SProvide following details under Item Head:
* In view of Lower Subscription in the Rights Issue, the amount allocated to the Objects were reduced.

(a) Name of the object(s):
(b) Brief description of the object(s):

(c) Location of the object(s) (if applicable):
(iii) Deployment of unutilised IPO proceeds:

iii) Deployment of unutilised IPO proceeds: (Rs. In Lacs)
$\dot{z}$
Sr.
Type of instrument and name of the entity
nvested in
nvested
Amount
Aaturity
date
$\lceil \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{2} \cdot \$ Return on Investment Market Value as at the end of
uarter*
Balance with Bank 235.54 $\overline{M}$ NA NA 235.54
Total Available balance 235.54 235.54

* Where the market value is not feasible, provide NAV/NRV/Book Value of the same

course of action
Proposed
Reinstatement
completed
NA NA NA NA
(Rs. In Lacs) Comments of the Board of Directors Reason of delay The delay was due to delay in
construction of plant.
Since the construction of main plant got
delayed, the construction of RDC also
got delayed
Completed Completed Completed
Delay months)
(no. of
days/
2 Month
Completion Date Actual* Completed in May 2019
commercial production
started in August 2019
31-03-2019 Completed in March 2020 12 Month Completed Completed Completed
As per the Offer
Document
31-03-2019 31-03-2019 31-03-2019 31-03-2019
$(iv)$ Delay in implementation of the object $(s)$ Object(s) roject of Reinstatement of paint
nanufacturing plant at Nashik
Setting up of Regional Distribution
entre (RDC) at Nashik
ong Term Working Capital
Requirements
General Corporate purposes Expenses for the issue

$\overline{5}$