AI assistant
SEB — Annual Report 2017
Mar 5, 2018
2966_10-k_2018-03-05_33873a75-4266-4658-ba43-8b51c20b92bf.pdf
Annual Report
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
2017
Annual Report

2017
Annual Report
Annual Report 2017
Annual General Meeting
at Stockholm Concert Hall, Hötorget, Stockholm, Sweden.
– have notified the bank in either of the following ways:
The Board proposes a dividend of SEK 5.75 per share for 2017.
to be distributed by Euroclear Sweden AB on Wednesday 4 April 2018.
between 9 am and 4.30 pm (CET) or
sebgroup.com
Dividend
on Tuesday 20 March 2018:
at sebgroup.com or
Contacts
Head office
Telephone +46 771 62 10 00
Jonas Söderberg2) Head of Investor Relations Telephone: +46 8 763 83 19 E-mail: [email protected]
1) As of 1 May 2018, Masih Yazdi assumes the position of Finance Director (telephone +46 72 023 9458, e-mail: [email protected])
Postal address SEB, SE-106 40 Stockholm, Sweden
Visiting address Kungsträdgårdsgatan 8, Stockholm, Sweden
(telephone + 46 8 506 23198, e-mail: [email protected])
2) As of 1 April 2018 Christoffer Geijer assumes the position of Head of Investor Relations
Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB's corporate registration number: 502032-9081
Jan Erik Back1) Chief Financial Officer Telephone: +46 8 22 19 00 E-mail: [email protected]
The Annual General Meeting will be held on Monday 26 March 2018 at 1 pm (CET)
A notice convening the Annual General Meeting, including an agenda, is available on
Shareholders who wish to attend the Annual General Meeting shall at the latest
– be registered in the shareholders' register kept by Euroclear Sweden AB, and
by telephone 0771 23 18 18 (+46 771 23 18 18 from outside Sweden)
in writing to the following address: Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken c/o Euroclear Sweden, Box 191, 101 23 Stockholm, Sweden
Wednesday 28 March 2018, is proposed as record date for the dividend payments. If the Annual General Meeting resolves in accordance with the proposal, the share will be traded ex-dividend on Tuesday 27 March 2018 and dividend payments are expected
Viveka Hirdman-Ryrberg Head of Group Communications
E-mail: [email protected]
and Group Marketing Telephone: +46 8 763 85 77
Malin Schenkenberg Financial Information Officer Telephone: +46 8 763 95 31 E-mail: [email protected] Production: SEB and Intellecta Corporate • Photos; Johnér, Getty Images, Shutterstock, Hans-Erik Nygren, Andreas Lind, Joachim Lundgren and others • Printing: Elanders • SEGR0135 2018.02
| This is SEB | Cover |
|---|---|
| Chairman's statement | 2 |
| President's statement | 3 |
| Strategy | 4 |
| Macro environment | 4 |
| SEB's value creation | 6 |
| Long-term strategic priorities | 9 |
| Current business plan | 10 |
| Overall targets and outcome | 12 |
| Customers | 14 |
| Customer segments | 15 |
| Large corporations and financial institutions | 16 |
| Small and medium-sized companies | 18 |
| Private individuals | 20 |
| Stakeholders | 22 |
| SEB in society | 22 |
| SEB's employees | 26 |
| Shareholders and the SEB share | 29 |
| REPORT OF THE DIRECTORS | |
| Financial review of the group | 32 |
| Result and profitability | 32 |
| Financial structure | 36 |
| Divisions and business support | 38 |
| Geographic markets | 40 |
| Risk, liquidity and capital management | 44 |
| Regulatory requirements | 50 |
| Corporate governance | 52 |
| Board of Directors | 54 |
| Group Executive Committee | 60 |
| Remuneration report | 64 |
| Internal control over financial reporting | 66 |
| Sustainability Report | 67 |
| Financial statements and notes | 72 |
| SEB Group | 73 |
| Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken | 78 |
| Notes to the financial statements | 83 |
| Five-year summary | 164 |
| Proposal for the distribution of profit | 166 |
| Auditor's report | 167 |
| Definitions | 171 |
| Calendar and other information | Cover |
Contents 2017 in brief
Important events
Large corporate customers refinanced their debt in the attractive markets and were less inclined to demand traditional financing.
Financial institutions searched for high-yielding and more risky investments in the low interest market environment.
Private customers increasingly took advantage of SEB's mobile offerings and new functionality was added throughout the year.
Johan Torgeby assumed the role of SEB's President and CEO.
SEB's offices in Arenastaden were inaugurated – new premises for more than 4,500 employees at around 20 per cent lower cost.
For the second year in a row, SEB qualified for inclusion in the Dow Jones Sustainability Index.
SEB signed an agreement to sell SEB Pension to Danske Bank for a total of DKK 6.5bn.
Key figures
| 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|
| 45,609 | 43,251 |
| 20,296 | |
| 20,806 | 14,867 |
| 12.7 | 11.3 |
| 11.5 | 7.8 |
| 0.48 | 0.50 |
| 7.49 | 4.88 |
| 5.75 | 5.50 |
| 19.4 | 18.8 |
| 5.2 | 5.1 |
| 145 | 168 |
| 22,702 |
With our vision and strategy…
Our purpose
We believe that entrepreneurial minds and innovative companies are key to creating a better world. We are here to enable them to achieve their aspirations and succeed through good times and bad.
Our vision
Deliver world-class service to our customers.
Our strategic priorities
- Leading customer experience
- Maintaining resilience and flexibility
- Growing in areas of strength.
Our sustainability aim
Be a role model in sustainability within the financial industry.
…via our business model…

…we serve our customers.
Large corporations
SEB's corporate customers in the Nordic region are among the largest in their respective industries. In Germany and the UK they range from large mid- corporates to large multinationals.
Financial institutions
SEB's institutional clients operate both in the Nordic countries and internationally.
Small and medium-sized companies
In all, SEB serves approximately 400,000 small and medium-sized companies in Sweden and the Baltic countries. Of these, some 274,000 are home bank customers.
Private individuals
SEB has approximately 4 million private individuals among its customers in Sweden and the Baltic countries. Of these some 1.4 million are home bank customers.
Creating value for our stakeholders

4) Outcome incl. items affecting comparability: 11.5%.
Totalfinancial value created by SEB Interest paid to customers Dividends paid to shareholders Salaries, pensions and benefits to employees Payments to suppliers Taxes and social charges 2016 2017 1.4 6.9 8.3 16.6 12.0 12.5 11.9 11.5 16.5 2.0 7.0 8.6 SEK 57.0bn SEK 58.2bn
Our customers
2,300 large corporations 700 financial institutions small- and medium- 400,000 sized companies 4 million private individuals
SEB – the leading Nordic corporate bank Share ofincome 2017, %
Regulatory fees

Who we are
Our commitment to create value for our customers is based on a tradition of entrepreneurship, international outlook and long-term perspective. As a bank we have an important role to play in the shift to a more sustainable world.
Vinjett Vinjett
What we do
SEB plays an active partin the development of the societies in which the bank is operating, primarily by building strong customer relationships. In Sweden and the Baltic countries we offer financial advice and a wide range of financial services. In Denmark, Finland, Norway, Germany and the United Kingdom, our operations have a strong focus on a full-service offering to corporate and institutional clients.
Whom we serve
SEB Annual Report 2017 1
Customers always come first. Our 15,000 committed and experienced employees work as a team to serve our customers in all the markets where we are operating.
SEB's robustness important in a world of rapid change
Globaltrends drive change
Ten years afterthe financial crisis started to spread, globaltrends have reshaped the banking industry.Anew regulatory frame work has contributed to amore transparent and resilientfinancial system.Unprece dented expansionarymonetary policy has supported the real economy, even though negative interestrates and an abundance of liquidity have distorted risk return rewards and compressed financialmarket volatility.Digitalisation and the rapid technological development are impacting customer behaviours and disrupting banks' existing businessmodels. In addition,
banks have increasingly acknowledged theirrole in the shifttowards amore sustainable world.
These trends impacted the Board's work during the past year, which was extraordi narily intense with 25 boardmeetings. It is our beliefthat, in this increasingly com plex world, speed and ability to adapt as well as to attractthe right people have grownmore important; just as the trust that comes with a sound financial position.
Transformation on many fronts
The Board has now worked together with our new CEO, Johan Torgeby,for close to a year. Johan Torgeby has together with his managementteam taken several initiatives to speed up the transformation ofthe bank, develop a more data-driven culture and broaden the set of competences in SEB. The past year also involved major implementation of new regulatory frame works. It was a hallmark for all of SEB that the adaption to MiFID II and IFRS 9, atthe same time as the strategic initiative to transform our German business into a branch, could be finalised timely.
The way forward – world-class service
SEB's strategic direction, to focus on a leading customer experience, ensure continued financialresilience and to grow together with our customers,remains. As we are passing the first phase of ourlongterm vision of world class service, we are now focusing on setting the roadmap for the next phase. We maintain ourfinancial targets and the bank has a solid capital position as well as capital generation which, in the light of the proposed new Basel III standards for creditrisk, continue to be of prime focus. In 2017 total shareholderreturn reached six per cent. Our ambition is higher. We are determined to work relentlessly forthe best interests of our customers, so that you as share holders can expect an attractive and sustainable return overthe long term.
Stockholm, February 2018
Marcus Wallenberg Chairman of the Board
In an increasingly complex world,the ability to adapt and the trustthat comes with a sound financial position, are ever more important." Marcus Wallenberg

Step by step we are delivering on ourlongterm strategy
In SEBwe take great pride in knowing our customerswell and creating long-term value based on a tradition of entrepreneurship and long-termperspective. To us this goes hand in handwith ourtargetto be a rolemodel in sustainabilitywithin the financial industry. We aspire to be the leading Nordic bank for corporations and institutions and the top universal bank in Sweden and the Baltic countries.
More positive business sentiment
In 2017, we could see that business sentiment gradually grew more positive. Spurred by more jobs, higher asset prices and higherinvestmentlevels as well as increased trade,the world economy geared up despite heightened geopolitical uncertainty.However, large global imbal ances remain and central banks have a
difficult balancing actto return to a more conventional monetary policy going forward. Most SEB customer segments increased their activity levels. Large corporate clients benefited from favoura ble financing conditions. IPO and M&A activity picked up and debt capital markets saw high activity, albeit demand fortradi tional bank financing was low. Financial institution customers face an increasingly complex regulatory environment and we were able to supportthem through our broad custody offering including also administrative and back-office services. SME customers in Sweden and the Baltic countries increased their demand for lending. The Swedish housing market saw some healthy signs of stabilisation. Private customers continued to increase their interaction with us – in the branch offices, through remote advisory and mobile services and in our 24/7 contact centre.
Delivering on the business plan
SEB's long-termpriorities–delivering a leading customer experience,maintaining resilience and flexibility and growing in areas of strength–formthe basis for our three-year business plan.Two years into the planwe are speeding up the transformation. We have increasingly focused on areas
wherewe have scale aswell as on simplifying processes and building data analytics capabilities so thatwe can increase customer convenience. This also involves changingways ofworkingwithmore collaboration across SEBwith a holistic advisory approach towards our customers.We strive for agile development,teaming up product, IT, user experience and other specialists to deploymany small launches that are continuously calibratedwith customers.
The prerequisites for banks are quite differenttoday compared with ten years ago. However,the importance of having deeply committed employees working together, eagerto learn and develop, never changes. I would like to take this opportunity to thank all our clients that choose to work with us and our employees. The whole team is deeply committed to delivering world-class service in everythingwe do so thatwe can be the preferred choice overthe long term in the eyes of our customers.
Stockholm, February 2018
Johan Torgeby President and Chief Executive Officer
Macro environment
Vinjett Vinjett
4
New technologies, new customer behaviours and new regulations are macro trends that affect banks' operations in a tangible way. The global economy continues its strong development, despite growing geopolitical uncertainty.
trong economic development but geopolitical uncertainty S
The global economy continued its strong develop mentin 2017, while interestrates remained low. Geopolitical uncertainty increased whereas the financial markets continued to develop positively. From a global perspective,the eurozone is getting back on its feet and a generalrecovery has also been noted in China, Japan,the USA and emerging markets. The Nordic economies are showing a broad upswing. In Sweden growth was strong while atthe same time the risks in the real estate marketincreasingly came into focus.
As forthe more long-term developmenttrends, extreme weather events putthe issue of climate change into greaterfocus. The target oflimiting
the globaltemperature rise to 2 degrees Celsius appears to be increasingly more difficultto reach.
Geopoliticaltensions, global imbalances and the large migration tides in recent years are factors that significantly affectthe macro environment. Since 2007 global indebtedness has increased by more than 40 percentage points to around 260 per cent of global GDP. In parallel, most Western countries are struggling with a growing demographic challenge posed by disproportionate population pyramids. This is resulting in a greater dependency burden for the actively working and in straining social security systems.

Digitalisation redrawing the map
Forthe pastfewyears, newtechnol ogy, newactors aswell as changing regulations and customer behaviours are redrawing themap regardingwho can offer bank services aswell aswhat services banks can offer and how.
Owing to the rapid development, mature universal banks are encountering competition from fintech com panies, which often develop solutions for specific financial services. They are agile at putting together userfriendly services, buttheir disadvantage is thatthey cannot offerthe trust, convenience and comprehensive solutions provided by full-service banks.
The developmentis shifting so that banks, with theirlarge customer bases, cooperate or enterinto partnerships with new actors in an effort
to jointly create services, develop the offerings and improve the customer experience.
By understanding andmonitoring customer behaviour banks are providing personalised offers at an increasing rate.
Blockchain technology andArtificial intelligence (AI) are developing rapidly and are expected to have amajor impact also on banks.Blockchain technology enables transactions to be verified and processed in real-time.AI, as virtual agents, is already being used by banks for customer service.Digitalisation is also creating opportunities to enhance productivity in the banking sector by automating internal pro cesses and reducing administrative work.
Newrules for consumer protection and transparency
New regulations continue to be implemented forthe financial sector,requiring extensive adaptation of processes,routines and system support. The volume of new regulations is beginning to subside but much work remains in implementing currentregulation changes.
» The Markets in Financial Instruments Direc tive (MiFID II) took effect atthe beginning of 2018, aiming atincreasing consumer protection and transparency in alltypes ofinvestment products. The Payment Services Direc tive (PSD2) comes into force in 2018, and requires banks to open up theirtransaction information,thereby creating the opportunity forthird-party actors to forinstance initiate payments. This is commonly referred to as Open Banking. In addition,the EU's new Gen eral Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) takes effectin May 2018, laying out new rules for how companies in all sectors are to process personal data.
Two important accounting standards,took effect on 1 January 2018 – IFRS 9 Financial Instruments, and IFRS 15 Revenue from Con tracts with Customers. Both set standards for betterinformation about companies' income and profitability.
In 2017 the European Commission began work on a project aimed at ensuring that financialregulators incorporate sustainability aspects into their supervision.
Read more about IFRS 9 and 15 on p. 37. Read about SEB's regulatory work on p. 50.
SEB Annual Report 2017
SEB creates value
Customer centricity, long-term perspectives and financial strength form
the foundation for meeting the expectations of customers, employees and society at large. Ultimately, this creates value for the shareholders.
Customers
1.7 million corporate and private customers The customers' needs are atthe core ofthe bank's business. Customers' high expectations on service and quality advice as well as sustainable solutions drive the bank's business

Shareholders
development and offerings.
269,000 shareholders
The capital provided by SEB's share holders is a prerequisite for conducting the bank's business. The shareholders expect a competitive and sustainable return on their capital. Many ofthe major owners have a long-term perspective on their engagementin the bank.

Employees
15,000 employees
SEB's employees build and deepen customerrelationships. Their commitment, skills and continuous learning are key success factors forthe bank's business and future development.

Society
Society at large
Banks play an integralrole in society and are vitalfor creating economic growth and social value. With this comes an expectation thatthe bank takes greatresponsibility for how it acts,to enable society to continue to develop in a sustainable way.


Strategy
Long-term strategy
SEB's strategy is built on developing deep customerrelationships with a long-term perspective. See p. 9.
Service
Customer-oriented offering
Proactive quality advice and a holistic offering are provided atthe customers' convenience, based on customerinsights. See p. 16–21.
IT
Secure and functional IT
The IT structure promotes stability in the daily operation and agile development of products and services. See p. 48 and p. 7 in the Sustainability Overview.
Value creation based on trust
Banks play a fundamentalrole in society by acting as an interme diary providing, and advising on, a wide range offinancing and savings solutions,risk management and payment services for all types of customers. SEB's operations impact – and is impacted by – customers, shareholders, employees and society. Withouttheir trust,the bank cannotfunction. This is why the bank adapts to a changing environment, acts in accordance with regulations and
expectations, and strives to provide services that are insightful, transparent and accessible on customers'terms.
In addition, high ethical standards are being upheld internally in orderto maintain the stakeholders'trust. SEB's Code of Conduct, internalrules and procedures are in place, supported by a culture based on openness, business acumen and SEB's core values. ReadmoreabouttheCodeofConductonp.28andonsebgroup.com

Resilience
Financial strength
Financial strength gives the resilience and flexibility required to serve customers over the long term.See p. 9, 32 and 44.
Governance
Solid corporate governance
Corporate governance is based on clear allocation ofresponsibility, a well devel oped structure forinternal control and ownerinvolvement. See p. 52.
Risk
Sound risk culture
To meet customers' needs SEB assumes and manages risks. SEB knows its custo mers well and risks are mitigated by prudence,risk awareness and expertise throughoutthe organisation. See p. 44.
creates both social and financial value
For customers
By providing proactive advice and a wide range of convenient services, SEB supports its customers' longterm aspirations and adds value in all phases oflife ofindividuals and development stages of companies and institutions.See p. 16–21.
For shareholders
Dividends and potential increases in market value overtime contribute to shareholders'financial security and enable new investments. SEB's competitiveness is increased and long-term risks are reduced through the integration of environmental, social and governance aspects. See p. 29.
For employees
The employees take partin, and value, the opportunities forlearning and further developmentthat are integrated in SEB's business. Employees also participate in the many partnerships that SEB supports to help communities develop and prosper. See p. 26.
For society at large
SEB intermediates financial solutions, provides payment services and manages risks, which together promote economic growth and prosperity. SEB pays taxes and fees according to localrules where it operates. SEB takes responsibility as a provider offinancing and as an asset manager and works proactively with environmental, social and governance issues.See p. 22.
Total distribution offinancial value SEK58.2bn for 2017 Interest paid to customers SEK 16.6bn Dividends paid to shareholders SEK 12.5bn Salaries, pensions and benefits to employees SEK 11.5bn Payments to suppliers SEK 8.6bn Taxes and social fees SEK 7.0bn Regulatory fees
SEK 2.0bn
World-class service
SEB's long-term vision, to deliver world-class service to our customers, reflects a future in which customer orientation, simplicity and accessibility increase in importance.
Long-term strategic priorities
Founded in the service of enterprise more than 160 years ago, SEB has through the years played an active partin societal developmentin the markets in which it operates. Building on this entrepreneurial heritage, itis the bank's ambition to be the undisputed leading Nordic corpo rate and institutional bank, as well as the top
universal bank in Sweden and the Baltic countries. Itis also the bank's ambition to be a role model in sustainability within the financial industry. The long-term strategic priorities and the three-year business plan, outlined on the next page, define the way forward.
SEB's strategic priorities Select indicators

A strategy for all stakeholders
The strategic priorities and the business plan, which includes the sustainability success factors,reflectthe bank's material matters. These material matters are in line with the expectations of SEB's stakeholders. The opera tions are carried out based on a foundation of sound risk management,financial strength, business ethics and conduct, data protection and people management. Each year,the material matters are assessed to ensure thatthe priorities remain relevant and to identify poten tial emerging issues. The evaluation is based on internal and external stakeholder perspectives from economic, environmental and social viewpoints. From the stakeholder dialogues,the bank draws conclusions on how to prioritise and integrate the material matters into the business plan.
Read more about the materiality process and stakeholder engagement in the Sustainability Overview.
Current business plan
SEB's long-term strategic priorities form the basis for the three-year business plan for 2016–2018. The plan focuses on two main areas, growth and transformation, supplemented by three sustainability success factors. The validity of the three-year plan is ensured by rolling updates to align with changing business conditions.
Since 1 January 2016:
Assets under management (netinflow and value) increased by SEK
162billion
Growth in corporate credits, SEK
93billion
New large corporate customers
130
Growth
Accelerated growth in Sweden Further strengthen the bank's position across all customer segments in Sweden. Provide a widerrange of services
Nordic and German large corporations and institutions
Savings offering to private individuals and corporate customers
Create growth by offering private and corporate customers convenient and advisory-based solutions including bancassurance to caterfor customers' need forlong-term savings.
Since 1 January 2016:
Increase in loans reclassified in accordance with SEB's green framework, SEK

SEB's green bonds, underwritten globally, increased by SEK

Sustainability success factors
In orderto reach the ambition to be a role model in sustainability within the financial industry,the bank focuses on three sustainability success factors. The prerequisite is engaged and knowledgeable employees who provide responsible and proactive advice, with a specialfocus on environmental impact and transparency. Read more the Sustainability Overview
Sustainable financing
Increase the share of positive impact financing. Strengthen sustainable advising and expand the sustainable offering.
and increasingly use customer data to proactively offer
Read more on p. 16–21
new services.
Expand the corporate and institutional customer business in the Nordic countries and Germany with focus on the full-service offering and digital portals while selectively attracting targeted UK corporate customers.

Transformation
Read more on p. 16–21
| World-class service |
Focus on customerjourneys and use customer data in orderto create a leading customer experience based on a personalised and convenientfull-service offering where customers can choose where and in what mannerthey wantto be served. |
|
|---|---|---|
| Digitalisation | Develop customised advisory tools and interfaces based on individual customer needs and behaviourin various channels. This includes transforming the firstline of service to digital solutions and portals. Automate internal processes in orderto improve efficiency. |
|
| Continuous Continue to investin attracting talents with the right values and learning providing continuous learning and development opportunities to existing employees. Ensure a gradual competence shift broad- ening the role for client executives and also developing capa bilities in service design and data analytics. |
Since 1 January 2016:
Increase in customer usage of mobile services
40%
Remote advisory meetings
in the Baltic countries 1,500
Employees in leadership/talent management programmes
1,543
Sustainable investments
Be the leadingNordic supplier of sustainable investmentswith a comprehensive and competitive offeringwhere environmental, social andgovernance factors are fully integratedintotheinvestmentprocessinallasset types.Strengthen sustainable investment advising.
Innovation and entrepreneurship
Read more on p. 22–25
Supportinnovation and entrepreneurship to drive sustainable economic development and contribute to creating new jobs.
Since 1 January 2016:
Contribution to entrepreneurial and innovation partnerships, SEK
25 million
2017: Funds managed with sustainability criteria; share of SEB Funds'
total assets under management 25%
Overalltargets and outcome
The progress of the strategy and three-year business plan is monitored and measured at many levels. These selected metrics provide a progress overview.
Customers

2017 2016 2015 Customer experience and satisfaction Various internal and external metrics are used to measure customer satisfaction. Customers' willingness to recommend SEB is one ofthe key measures ofthe bank's progress.
Shareholders

Financial targets
Through the resilience and flexibility that come from a strong capital base, good access to funding, high credit ratings and cost efficiency, SEB can create shareholder value in varying market condi tions. The Board of Directors sets three financialtargets that contribute to financial strength.
Nordic large corporations Customers' willingness to recommend 1)

Small companies in Sweden SEB internal NPS 2)

1) According to Prospera 2) Net Promoter Score method
Nordic financial institutions Customers' willingness to recommend 1)
| Industry | Outcome | Industry average |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.1 | 3.7 | 2015 | 3.6 | 3.5 |
| 4.1 | 3.8 | 2016 | 3.9 | 3.7 |
| 4.2 | 3.8 | 2017 | 3.9 | 3.7 |
Private individuals in Sweden SEB internal NPS 2)
| Target | Outcome | Target | |
|---|---|---|---|
| >35 | 2015 | 34 | >35 |
| >35 | 2016 | 37 | >35 |
| >45 | 2017 | 41 | >45 |
Target
Leading position in selected customer segmentswhere an importantmeasure iswhether customers arewilling to recommend SEB.
Other customer surveys
According toProspera's overall performance evaluation SEBmaintained its no. 1 place in the ranking fromNordic tier 1 corporations, butthe ranking fromallNordic large corporations decreased from2nd in2016to3rd place in2017.
The ranking of SEBbyNordic finan cial institutionsmovedto no.2,from no. 1. Swedish institutions, however, ranked SEBas no. 1 in alltenpossible categories.
In the SwedishQuality Indexmeasurement of customer satisfaction, SEB ranked second among the larger banks, both among private and corpo rate customers. Comparedwith last year, however, SEB's score fromboth segments decreased. Thiswas an industry-wide trend.
Common equity Tier 1 capitalratio, Per cent

Return on equity, Per cent
| 2015 | 12.2 | (12.9) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 7.8 | (11.3) | |
| 2017 | 11.5 | (12.7) | |
Outcome excluding items affecting comparability are shown within parenthesis.
Dividend payoutratio, Per cent

Outcome excluding items affecting comparability are shown within parenthesis.
1) Based on the proposed dividend for 2017
Target
SEB shallmaintain a Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capitalratio thatis around 150 basis points higherthan the regulatory requirement. Per 31 dec 2017 SEB's bufferwas 2.2 per cent. SEB's estimate ofthe current CET1 requirementfromthe Swedish Finan-
cial SupervisoryAuthoritywas 17.2 per cent at year-end 2017.
Target SEB shall generate a competitive return on equity. This means that the bank in the long term aspires to achieve a 15 per centreturn on equity.
| Target | ||
|---|---|---|
40 per cent or more of earnings per share. SEB strives forlong-term dividend growth. The size ofthe dividend takes into account SEB's financial position,the prevailing economic situation, earnings,regulatory requirements and opportunities for growth.
Employees

Motivation and engagement The annual employee survey, Insight, measures employee engagement, efficiency and trust. It also measures employees' willingness to recommend SEB as a place to work.
Employee engagement, Index Engagement
| Outcome | Financial sector average |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 79 | 71 | |
| 2016 | 73 | ||
| 2017 | 73 |
Employees, Index Willingness to recommend
| SEB as a place to work | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | Financial sector average |
||
| 2015 | 80 | 71 | |
| 2016 | 78 | 73 | |
| 2017 | 78 | 74 |
Performance excellence, Index Efficiency and trust
| Financial sector average |
Outcome | Financial sector average |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 79 | 71 | 2015 | 80 | 75 |
| 77 | 73 | 2016 | 81 | 76 |
| 77 | 73 | 2017 | 81 | 77 |
Target
SEB's targetis to be themost attractive employerin the financial sector. Progress ismeasured through the employee survey Insight.
Comment
SEBcontinues to outperformthe financial sector on employee engagement, performance excellence aswell aswillingness to recommendtheworking place.
Society

Reputation
SEB monitors the results ofthe TNS Reputation Index, which measures the bank's reputation among consumers and business owners.
Sustainability
SEB wants to be a role model in sustainability within the finan cial industry. One indicatoris whetherthe bank meets the criteria forinclusion in sustainability indexes. SEB also has the ambition to lowerits CO2 impact.
Reputation1), Index
| Outcome | 2) Average |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 42 | 42 | |
| 2016 | 45 | 40 | |
| 2017 | 42 | 38 | |
1) Corporate reputation among the general public, according to TNS Reputation Index (weighted in the Baltic countries).
Inclusion in sustainability index
SEB meets the criteria
| STOXX | |
|---|---|
| Ethibel | |
| FTSE4Good | |
| ECPI | |
| Dow Jones | |
CO2 emissions
| Tonnes Outcome |
Target for 2020 |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 21,315 | 17,000 | |
| 2016 | 20,437 | 17,000 | |
| 2017 | 20,537 | 17,000 |
Sweden Baltic countries
Target
17,000tonnesCO2.
| Outcome | 2) Average |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 57 | 56 | ||
| 2016 | 54 | 51 | ||
| 2017 | 57 | 55 | ||
2) SEB, SHB, Swedbank, Nordea, Danske Bank.
Target To be included in atleastfive selected sustainability indexes.
ReduceCO2 emissions by20per cent between2016and2020,reaching
Target
Reduce the gap to the no. 1 in the indus try and in the long termhave the strongestreputation among industry peers.
Comment
The long-termtrend in Sweden is stable. SEBwas ranked as no.2,which was abovemarket average. In Estonia, SEBwas ranked as shared no. 1. In Latvia and Lithuania there hasbeen a negative trend and SEBranked as no.3.
Comment
SEBhas been included in STOXX, Ethibel, FTSE4Good and ECPIfor several years.2017was the second yearthat SEBwas included in theDowJones sustainability index.
Comment
TheCO2 emissionswere almostflat comparedwith the previous year. Increased business travel counter acted reductions relatedto company cars and paper use.
Customers
Vinjett Vinjett
14
With the customers' needs in focus and based on the bank's vision to provide world-class service, SEB is taking a number of initiatives in its business plan in order to improve the customer experience with respect to advisory services, simplicity and sustainability.
Customer segments
Large corporations
2,300 SEB serves some 2,300 large corporations in a wide range of industries and in most cases with an internationalfocus. In the Nordic countries these companies are among the largestin their respective industries, while in Germany and the United Kingdom customers range from the large mid-corp segment up to multi national corporations.
Financial institutions
SEB serves some 700 financial institutions, consisting of pension and asset managers, hedge funds, insurance companies and other banks, active in the Nordic countries and internationally.
400,000 Small andmedium-sized companies
SEB serves some 400,000 small and medium-sized companies in Sweden and the Baltic countries. Ofthese 175,000 are home bank customers in Sweden and 99,000 in the Baltic countries. The segmentincludes approximately 650 mid-corp and public sector customers in Sweden, many with international operations. In the public sector,the bank serves government agencies, state owned companies and municipalities.
Private individuals
700 4,000,000 SEB has approximately four million private customers in Sweden and the Baltic countries. Ofthese 488,000 are home bank customers in Sweden and 920,000 in the Baltic countries. For private customers with sizeable capital and a need for more qualified advice, SEB offers a comprehensive range of private banking services.This offeringwasbroadenedin2017, andSEB nowprovidesprivatebanking services to some39,000customers.
Customer activity 2017
T he world economy developed positively in 2017. Strong balance sheets, less dependence ofinventory cycles and increased financial sector regulation dampened busi ness cycle volatility. In the prevailing low interest-rate environment, capital market volatility was low despite heightened geopolitical uncertainty.
Demand fortraditional bank financing was low during the year among Nordic and German large corporates. In the markets with low volatility, institutional customers' demand forrisk management services decreased while they searched

for higher-yielding assets. Equity capital market and IPO activities were strong.
In the Baltic countries, small and medi um-sized companies and private customers were more positive and sought financing to an increasing degree. Baltic customers are showing a growing appreciation for new mobile banking services and increasingly use them.
In Sweden, customerinteraction was high in all channels – including branches, the 24-hour contact centre and digital channels. Towards the end of the year, the Swedish housing market saw some healthy signs of stabilisation.
Large corporations and financial institutions
Growth and trans formation, three-year plan 2016–2018
SEB continued to grow in the Nordic countries and gained some 100 new large corporate customers since the business plan was launched. In the first two years ofthe plan, customerrelations have broadened and earnings per cus tomerincreased among large corporate customers. SEB fortified its leading posi tion regarding major corporate transac tions. In addition, according to Prospera's annual customer satisfaction survey, SEB was ranked highest among peers in Sweden.
Looking ahead,the work focuses on continuing the deepening ofthe customerrelations and increasing the number of products that are used.
The three-year plan includes a broad ening ofthe UK operations, where SEB now directly targets selected UK large corporates. The bank broughtin more than ten UK corporate customers during 2017.
SEB's in-depth knowledge of its corporate and institutional customers enables the bank to create services that add value. The bank is exploring the opportunities of new technologies and was the first Nordic bank to use blockchain technology to execute payments.
Growth
Improved custody services
During 2017 a number oflarge financial institutions chose to transfertheir custody account business to Investor World, SEB's new global custody account services platform, giving them access to improvements in areas such as managing customers' mutualfunds, collateral, corporate events, cash management and currency trading.
The platform has been developed in partnership with Brown Brothers Har riman, who provides the infrastructure, with SEB maintaining responsibility forthe customerinterface and ofthe relationship with customers.
Transformation
Visual support for cash management
In 2017 SEB launched a new advanced analysis and planning function which is integrated in C&I Online,the internet bank forlarge corporates and financial institu tions. The function, called Analytics, helps customers gain an overview, analyse and streamline theirliquidity position.
Analytics is directed primarily attreas ury and cash managers. Customers can include all oftheir banks world-wide in the system and thereby gain an aggregate overview oftheirliquidity.
First blockchain payment
In 2017 SEB was the first bank in the Nordic countries to use blockchain technology to execute real payments in production. One of the bank's large corporate customers is now using this technology in executing payments between its SEB accounts in Sweden and New York. This pilot project is promising and shows that it is possible to execute a payment in a few seconds, compared
SEB's position statements and sector policies


The policies are available on sebgroup. com/about-seb/sustainability
with up to 2 days previously, with maintained security.
Another blockchain initiative relates to customers' internationaltrade which requires manual and time-consuming doc ument handling. To simplify this process, the bank has joined together with more than ten international banks to develop a prototype, allowing the entire process to be more efficient.
Another area is fund trading. SEB has initiated cooperation with Nasdaq to test a new fund trading platform based on blockchain technology.
The bank has also become a part-owner in the R3 blockchain consortium and has invested in the Danish company Coinify, which works with blockchain payments.
Sustainability
Sustainable financing
Keeping pace with the growing climate challenge requires large infrastructure investments. Atthe same time, borrowers
Meet one of our customers:
"What's most important is a long-term perspective, partnership and an interest to join us on our growth journey"
Pia Aaltonen-Forsell
CFO at Ahlstrom-Munksjö
Ahlstrom-Munksjö is an indus trial groupthatdevelops fibre basedmaterialswith advanced functions that are usedin industrial applications aswell as in consumerproducts.The company has41production plants in 14countries.
The company has a long-standing relationship with SEB, which is one ofits core banks. This relationship coversmost product areas, fromfinancing and cashman-

agementto trade finance and trading solutions formanaging currency risks.
"This long and broad relationship is proofthatwe are satisfiedwith the cooperation. What'smostimportantin a banking relationship is a longtermperspective that can be applied in both good and tough times. Theremust also be a sense of engagement and interestin helping develop the company."


Meet one of our customers:
"SEB offers good and globally diversified service across regions as well as asset classes"
Mikko Mursula CFO atIlmarinen
The mutual insurance com pany Ilmarinen is responsible for pensions for some 1.1 million people in Finland. Assets under management amountto slightly more than EUR 45bn.
"When Italkwith our key people and their cooperation with SEB, I always see a few recurring common denomina tors.Among these are the good

personalrelationships and strong local presence here in Finland and the rest ofthe Nordic countries", saysMikko Mursula. SEBreceives high marks forits experienced and competent equities analysis team. The bank is also regarded as a leaderin sustainabil ity. "SEBwas one ofthe firstto include sustainability aspects in its equitymanagement".
and investors are becoming more aware ofthe advantages ofintegrating sustainability aspects in investment decisions.
SEB is contributing to this development by helping customers raise capitalfor green investments in areas such as infra structure and renewable energy. In 2007, SEB pioneered theworld's first green bond togetherwith the World Bank, and has now become theworld's third-largest under writer of green bonds. In 2017 SEB issued its first own green bond for EUR500million –money thatis earmarked forfinancing green initiatives and solutions.
SEB adheres to a number of policies that setthe framework forthe bank's lending and business in certain sectors with environmental impacts, such as fossilfuels, and the mining and metals industries. These and other sector policies and position statements form a valuable base for the customer dialogues and help incorpo rate sustainability aspects into various decisions. Since 2015 SEB does not provide new financing for coal mining and coal-fired power plants.
SEB is one ofthe largest microfinance fund managers in Europe. By investing in microfinance institutions, SEB's microfi nance funds offers loans to people with lowerincome in developing countries, who are often outside ofthe financial system. SEB manages six microfinance funds at a total value of around SEK 6 billion,reach ing more than 19 million entrepreneurs in 38 developing countries.
Small and medium-sized companies
Growth and trans formation, three-year plan 2016–2018
Corporate business is developing favourably with higherrevenue, new customers and a larger share of customers' busi ness. The bank's focus on advisory services and cross-selling is contributing to growth in revenue. In Sweden,the increase in lending volumes since the start of 2016 was driven primarily by lending in the real estate sector while demand for other corporate lending was relatively low. Corporate deposits were stable. Corporate credits have increased in the Baltic countries two years into the business plan.
Focus in 2018 will be on continuing growth efforts in the corporate segment, in Sweden with the target ofincreasing the market share by one percentage point per year. The opportunity for com panies to become customers digitally, the Greenhouse concept (see article to the right) and external partnerships are contributing factors expected to lead to higher business volumes and a growing share of customers' business.
SEB facilitates for customers through accessible services and is further developing its offering with new solutions, often in partnership with fintech companies and service providers. SEB works to promote entrepreneurship and innovation.
Growth
Partnerfor growth companies
In 2017 SEB launched Greenhouse, an undertaking designed to strengthen the bank's partnerships with growth compa nies. The idea is to serve as a discussion partnerthat companies can turn to for alltypes of business and growth matters and not only direct banking matters. Toward this end SEB has built up a network of external partners for matters that companies need assistance with, such as raising venture capital,tax issues, legal affairs and recruiting.
Greenhouse involves providing inspira tion and sharing knowledge through seminars, workshops and networking get-togethers. In addition, SEB invites selected companies to Growth Lab, a ten-week programme in which they receive help in concretising their growth plans.
Atthe innovation centre in Tallinn, SEB started a similar growth programme dur ing 2017 in which a number of selected companies receive support over a period ofthree to six months in concretising their development plans, strengthening their innovative ability and formulating their business models. Similar programmes are planned for Latvia and Lithuania in 2018.
Basic security for small business owners
Having adequate insurance protection is a common area of concern for small busi ness owners. SEB is one offew actors in the marketto offer competitive insurance coverfor all small business owners.
Since 2017 the Trygg Start ("Secure Start") and Trygg Grund ("Secure Basic") insurance solutions are included as default options in the bank's basic package for small business owners, giving them greater opportunities to complementtheir basic cover. Through Trygg Start, newly started companies can obtain health insurance, while Trygg Grund provides more established small businesses com prehensive insurance cover comparable to that provided through employment.
Transformation
Integration with service providers SEB has for a long time builtintegrated solutions that allow large corporations to manage and automate payments directly in their business systems. The same developmentis now rapidly unfolding for smaller companies, but here itis a matter of enabling technical integration with providers of cloud-based business systems as well as with bookkeeping and payroll services companies.
The firstintegration was created back in 2014 with the Visma business system. Since then, additional service providers have been added.
In 2017 SEB acquired a part-ownership stake in the fintech company Capcito. The company offers an online service through which companies can link their business systems to Capcito and thereby gain access to financing based on cash flow and underlying accounts receivable.

Meet one of our customers:
"For us the customer comes first, and SEB treats me the same way. "
Vladas A. Bumelis
Founder and Chairman ofthe Board of Biotechpharma
Biotechpharma is a Lithuanian company that develops and manufactures biopharmaceu tical products forthe pharmaceutical industry. The com pany has 150 employees and serves some 150 customers, primarily in the USA, Europe and Asia.
As an entrepreneur, Vladas has a long-standing relationship with SEB, which has sup ported him with financing and other services through his journey of growth.
"Ifeelthat banks should be a little conservative. They are

welcome to double-check the business plans and say no the firsttime. You can then go home and fine-tune your plans – notjust once, but sev eraltimes. This improves the results", he says.
When SEB launched a pri vate banking offering in Lithu ania a few years ago, Vladas left his previous Swiss bank and also moved his private banking business to SEB.
"I appreciate SEB's corpo rate culture. Itis based on relationships and commitmentto the customers."
Sustainability
Customer dialogue on sustainability The commitmentto sustainability is growing among the bank's small and mediumsized corporate customers. SEB supports them by giving and sponsoring lectures and arranging workshops on environmen-
tal, social and governance aspects in busi ness activities, and how to integrate these in their day-to-day operations.
SEB is working continuously to integrate sustainability in its own operations. In 2017 the toolfor business and credit analysis for small and medium-sized com panies was updated. Client executives now take sustainability aspects into accountin their analyses of companies
and in credit decisions. Coupled to the tool are support questions related to environ mental, social and governance aspects, which client executives reflect over and discuss with customers where needed. The aim is to analyse a company's entire value chain and gain a better understanding ofthe customer's opportunities and challenges. Such discussions are appreci ated by customers.
In the three Baltic countries SEB is working for positive social development by promoting entrepreneurship and including sustainability as a natural part of customer advice.
Private individuals
SEB makes everyday life easier by simplifying processes and providing easy-to-use solutions forthe bank's services and advice. Advanced data analysis and artificial intelligence are adding value through greater proactivity.
Growth and trans formation, three-year plan 2016–2018
Greater proactivity and improved ser vices contributed to increased growth in home mortgage volumes as well as deposits. In the Baltic countries, deposits grew and lending volumes have increased since the beginning of 2016 on the back ofimproved household finances. In Sweden,the growth in home mortgages can be credited partly to more proactive advice and simplified processes for new home mortgages and for customer onboarding. Focus in 2018 will be on achieving a growth rate that is more in line with the total market.
Personal Banking customers have been cautious aboutincreasing savings in mutualfunds and a potentialfor greater growth remains. Even so, savings volumes have increased since the start of 2016.
New services, automated functions and the introduction ofrobot advice will free up time for more proactive and per sonalised service forthose who need it. In 2018,focus will be on furtherincreas ing proactivity, such as through the remote advisory services functionality.
Growth
Savings
The shifting demographic trends increase the need forlong-term savings. In Sweden SEB is the only major bank with a bancassurance savings offer; including traditional life insurance. A similar offeris provided in the Baltic countries. SEB managed assets, for both private and institutional customers, increased by SEK 14bn netin 2017.
Improved customer experience
Customers appreciate and increasingly use SEB's convenient services. In 2017 it became easierfor private individuals to obtain a home mortgage commitment or become a new customer ofthe bank entirely digitally.
With respectto home mortgages,the first step was a simplified home mortgage calculation, which gives customers an indication of how much they have the possibility to borrow. The second step was a simplified process for obtaining a mortgage commitment, which takes a few minutes to complete.
In the sameway, itis possible to become a newcustomerwithout having to visit a branch office to identify oneself,fill in a know-your-customerformand sign various agreements. The only requirementis that the customeris of age and has amobile BankID.
Transformation
Remote advisory services
In the area of pensions SEB has for some time offered remote advisory services, enabling customers to get qualified pensions advice directly attheir workplaces or at home. This increases accessi bility and convenience, and has resulted in a high level of customer satisfaction according to surveys.

A similarfunction forremote advisory services was introduced in 2017 in the Baltic countries, where private customers can book a video conference with an advisor and perform certain services such as opening a new bank account.
In the Swedish operations, screen sharing technology and remote advice are being tested for alltypes of services in a pilot project.
Data analysis and artificial intelligence
Access to data is becoming an increasingly importantresource for understanding customers' needs, boosting customer loyalty, improving service and attracting more customers.
In 2017 SEB established a data lake, a technical platform for gathering, quality assuring and providing easy access to all data at SEB's disposal. This includes struc tured and unstructured data, internal as well as external data, and everything from real-time date to static data. With the help

Meettwo of our customers:
"It is a major advantage to be a customer both as a private person and business owner. "
Lotta and Anders Svensson Private and corporate customers
Lotta and her brother Anders Svensson run the building supply firm Woody Bygghandel Stockholm Syd. As entrepreneurs they have a long and deep relation with SEB.
"The bank is engaged in what we do. We trust each other and try to find solutions that are good for both parties. This is the exact same stand point we have in ourrelationships with our own customers", says Anders.

Both Anders and Lotta also do their personal banking with SEB.
"Itis amajor advantage to be a customer both as a pri vate person and business owner.Of course,mostthings can be handled digitally. Butit means a lot knowingwe can rely on a personal engagement fromthe bank", says Lotta.
"What's mostimportantis thatthings run smoothly on a day-to-day basis. Time is the one thing there is too little of!"
of artificial intelligence and advanced data analysis,the bank can increase its level of service and proactively meet customers' needs. SEB's digital assistant, Aida, devel oped further knowledge on serving cus tomers. Maintaining good control and structure ofthe bank's data increases internal efficiency.
Robotics technology is another new area. Manualtasks performed in many steps, such as monthly reports compiled from a variety of sources, can easily be programmed and performed by virtual (software) robots giving SEB employees time for more advanced tasks.
The private customer offering was enhanced with the launch of digital card payments through collaboration with Samsung Pay. In addition, Fitbitlaunched the payment service Fitbit Pay in Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Finland. SEB joined from start enabling many ofits card holders to pay with their smart watches in stores providing contactless payments.
Sustainability
Sustainable products
Interestin sustainable products is growing among private customers, especially in the savings area where more and more customers want assurances thattheir savings contribute to more sustainable societies.
During 2017 changes were made in fund managementto strengthen SEB's basic offering from a sustainability perspective. Today the bank's allocation funds, strategy funds, invest directly in stocks and bonds to a higher degree. This is giving fund managers greater opportunities to influence the individual holdings from a sustainability perspective. Approximately two-thirds ofthe strategy funds' assets willthereby adhere to the fund company's most stringent sustainability standards, which are the same as for SEB's sustaina bility funds.
SEB also offers several mutualfunds with a distinct sustainability profile, such as the SEBGreen Bond Fund,which invests in green bonds, and the SEB Hållbarhets fond Global and SEB Hållbarhetsfond Sverige equity funds, whose managers choose companies that actively contribute to sustainable development.
During 2017 SEB Hållbarhetsfond Sver ige obtained the Nordic "Swan" ecolabel, thereby certifying thatthe fund meets enhanced sustainability requirements which affectthe choice of shares in the fund. The requirements also mean that the fund's managers should clearly report how the fund and its investments contribute to sustainable development.
Read more in the Sustainability Overview.
SEB in society
As a bank, SEB is an integrated part of society and the communities where it operates. By engaging in innovation and entrepreneurship, financial literacy and social inclusion, the bank contributes to empowering future generations. The bank also works continuously to reduce its direct and indirect carbon dioxide impact.
22
A n environment where entrepreneurship is promoted and companies can thrive and investleads to prospering societies as this creates growth and new jobs. SEB therefore supports and collaborates with a number of organisations and meeting points to support companies;from start-ups through Young Entrepreneurs (Ung Företagsamhet) and Venture Cup,to the entrepreneurial elite, via Entrepreneur ofthe Year. In the Baltic countries SEB runs the web-based eAkadeemia, with educational videos,training and test modules for start-up businesses and entrepreneurs.
SEB's supportto partnerships forfuture generations, SEK

Supporting social entrepreneurs
Social entrepreneurs play an increasingly importantrole in societies where social and economic gaps as well as inequalities increase. SEB has a partnership with Inkludera, an umbrella organisation for social entrepreneurs that support groups in society thatrisk exclusion. In 2017 SEB participated atthe Social Innovation Summitin Malmö, one ofthe largest meeting places for social innovation in the Nordic countries. The overall goal was to explore new solutions to societal challenges. Together with Inkludera, SEB focused on how municipalities can become more successful in purchasing services for a better world among social entrepreneurs and thereby create value for society.

PegahAfsharian and Natassia Fry foundedKompis Sverige, a non-profit organisation supported by Inkludera. The organisation matches and creates meetings between Swedes and immigrants. SEB employees participate in the program.
Financial inclusion
SEB shares its knowledge about personal finances and can thus empower people to make more informed financial decisions and contribute to betterfunctioning socie ties. For many years, SEB has organised a Financial Literacy Road Show across the Baltic countries with the aim to educate youths to manage their private finances and to inspire them forthe future. SEB sessions have been run by 367 employees who have met with a total of 13,700 youths during the lasttwo years.
Mentor
Since 1997, SEB has partnered with Mentor, a foundation aiming to create relationships and build trust between young people and adults,to motivate and inspire as well as prevent drug abuse. Through Mentor, SEB's employees can support young teenagers and contribute to society, and atthe same time improve theirleader ship skills and personal development. In 2017,the Mentor engagementincluded, in total, close to 6,000 relationships. In Sweden, employees invested about 4,300 volunteering hours.
Reducing the bank's environmental footprint in society
Climate change is one oftoday's most serious challenges. SEB recognises the impor tance of actively working to reduce the direct environmental impact. SEB works to optimise the bank's energy consumption, reduce paper consumption and improve the company carfleet. Specialfocus is put on airtravel in orderto furtherreduce emissions related to business travel. This area accounts forthe major part of SEB's carbon footprint.
Read more in the Sustainability Report, p. 70.

The Global Goals – a business plan forthe world

Agenda 2030 and the UN's sustainable development goals
In 2017,the UN's Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs – also known as the Global Goals) have become a common "business plan" for nations, organisations and the business sector. The SDGs, which were adopted by the UN in 2015, are focused on ending poverty, protecting the planet and ensuring equality for all. They are integrated and they harmonise the three core elements of sustainable development: economic growth, social inclusion and environmental protection.
Through an active partnership with SEB's customers,the bank supports and contributes to many ofthe 17 Global Goals. How ever, SEB has chosen to prioritise four ofthese where the bank's operations have a fundamental impact:
- 8 Decent work and economic growth
- 9 Industry, innovation and infrastructure
- 13 Climate action
- 16 Peace, justice and strong institutions
Many of SEB's customers have settheir own priorities among the global goals, and the map ofthe goals facilitates the discussions that are being held with the bank on customers' challenges and opportunities.
For more than a decade SEB has developed a wide range of sustainable products, as well as policies and processes, which are aligned with the global goals. SEB has been a pioneerin offer ing green bonds and microfinance funds, and conducts systematic sustainability work in its investment operations. The bank's supportto entrepreneurs and strong focus on combating finan cial crime are other areas in which SEB is actively contributing to the goals.
In 2017, several initiatives were taken within SEB with respect to development of products and services related to the global goals. The ambition is to presentthe results ofthis work in 2018. Read more about how SEB is coupling the Sustainable Develop-
ment Goals to its operations in the Sustainability Overview.



Sustainability – a business issue
Sustainability is today an increasingly integrated part ofthe bank's business activities. This is rooted in the insightthat sustainability contributes to the bank's long-term profitability. SEB's ambition is to create long-term value from an economic, ethical, social and environmental perspective. The bank takes responsibility for how the business affects customers, employees, shareholders and society atlarge.
Climate crisis, social unrest and the risk of stranded assets are some examples of undesirable developmentthat affect people, companies and societies,the effects of which also SEB must manage in its business. How ever, sustainable development also means great opportunities. Rapid technological progress and new ways ofthinking lead to innovative solutions that contribute to meeting new needs in societies and reshaping industries.
On an international and national level, governments, authorities and the business sectors are taking strong measures to secure a more sustainable world including combatting climate change. For SEB,this means thatthe bank develops its advisory services furtherto also include how its customers can navigate in a more complex world. SEB is also upgrading its analysis and tools for how to better manage sustainability risks in its credit analyses and decisions.
Banks and the financial system play a centralrole in this development through their actions. One example of SEB's contribution to this shiftis the funnelling of capitalto green infrastructure investments. Another example is thatthe bank offers sustainable saving solutions for customers who wish to directthe investments into companies that are bestin class in terms of environmental, social and governance criteria.
Private customers' priorities
SEB strives to provide customers with services that are transparent and accessible on theirterms and often invites customers to test beta versions of new services. An example ofthis is a dialogue conducted by SEB's fund company with private customers with holdings in the fund SEB Hållbarhets fond Sverige in 2017. Based on the UN's 17 Global Goals, customers were invited to select what sustainability issues they considered to be the mostimpor tantto address in the companies where customers had made investments. The answers show that customers prioritise three ofthe goals, 13, Climate action, 6, Clean water and sanitation and 4, Quality education.
As a result ofthe survey, SEB's fund company will intensify efforts to combat climate change. Therefore, the fund company has joined the Institutional Inves tors Group on Climate Change. Here, investors gather globally in orderto influence the hundred companies that accountforthe largest share of emissions in the world. The companies are primarily in the gas and oil industry.
SEB's employees
SEB's employees share a strong beliefin the bank's purpose and vision. They feel that they can make a difference and are eager to develop. Looking ahead, the bank needs to further strengthen its competences in data analysis and continue promoting new ways of working, collaboration, and an innovative and inclusive culture that is built upon the bank's values.
S EB is an attractive employer with committed and motivated employees. The annual employee survey, Insight, shows thatthe bank's vision inspires and motivates employees,that employees like theirjobs, and thatthey feel involved in decisions that affectthem. Employee engagement and performance excellence (efficiency and trust) scores are high compared with the bank's peer companies in the interna tionalfinancial sector.
New ways of working and an innovative work environment
SEB's business plan is focused on profita ble growth and transformation. Achieving this requires employees who take responsibility fortheir own development as well as an innovative and inclusive work environment.
The method for driving development projects has been revised and is based to a growing extent on an agile work approach with cross-functionalteams that develop new services in close interaction with customers, based on their needs. Simplicity and user experience are central components in all development work.
Hackathons and knowledge sharing
The establishment ofthe bank's new offices in Arenastaden in Stockholm has opened new opportunities to foster highly dynamic ways of working and cross-functional collaboration. To promote a learning culture SEB has established numerous, diverse meeting forums in which employees can share their knowledge and inspiring stories. These meetings are video recorded and shared with all parts of the bank.
SEB has established an innovation lab in which employees have an opportunity, during a limited period oftime,to develop ideas up to creation of a finished proto type. In 2017 SEB conducted its firstinter nal hackathon at which some 70 employees spent one intensive day and night developing prototypes that offered improvements for customers and the bank.
Data is the heart of the bank, and that heart beats forthe customers."
Salla Franzén Chief Data Scientist at SEB
Continuous learning and new competences
The financial sectoris undergoing a rapid transformation, and to continue to be successful SEB needs to develop new competences. Toward this end SEB has developed a group-wide method for strategic planning offuture needs. With the help ofthis, every department can identify future key competences, deter mine the development needs for existing professionalroles and carry out succes sion planning.
SEB needs to strengthen its expertise in areas such as data analysis, service design and the digital customer experience, on top of other areas such as risk and security. This can be achieved in partthrough externalrecruitment, however, compe tence development of existing employees is atleast as important.
SEB's philosophy is that competence developmentis achieved primarily through continuous learning in the daily work. This is complemented by different types oftraining that SEB carries outfor a large portion ofthe employees.
#MeToo
During 2017,the #MeToo campaign highlighted the problem of sexual harassment and discrimination in many workplaces. #MeToo was discussed severaltimes within the Group Executive Committee and in the Board of Directors. SEB increased the internal communication on SEB's stance and how to reportimproprieties. The campaign speeded up the switch from an internalto a thirdparty whistle-blowing function which is now completed.

Meet Salla
With a background as a mathematician, Salla takes special interestin machine learning and algorithms. She leads an analysis team thatis tasked with inspiring and supporting all parts ofthe bank in basing their work on data – that is, using all ofthe knowledge at SEB's disposal to create value for customers.
Name: Salla Franzén
Age: 39
Position: Chief data scientist With SEB since: 2011
Key experience: The powerin working with highly motivated colleagues who are passion ate about new customer and business insights.
Inspiration: Numerous podcasts, articles, open source communities as well as interaction with scientists in my field of work.
Employee statistics 1)
| 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| 15,946 | 16,260 | 16,599 |
| 8,053 | 8,222 | 8,320 |
| 1,304 | 1,369 | 1,404 |
| 5,213 | 5,125 | 5,118 |
| 1,376 | 1,544 | 1,757 |
| 15,804 | 16,087 | 16,432 |
| 15,605 | ||
| 12.8 | 10.7 | 9.0 |
| 2.9 | 3.0 | 2.8 |
| 47 | 46 | 44 |
| 77 | 77 | 79 |
| 80 | ||
| 14,946 81 |
15,279 81 |
1)See also table p. 69 and the Sustainability Overview

Meet Yasser
Yasser arrived in Sweden three years ago from Syria. Via an internship at SEB's branch in Vellinge, he has now gained a permanent position as customer adviser atthe Norrmalm branch office in Stockholm.
Name: Yasser Kaddour
Age: 29
Position: Customer adviser
With SEB since: 2015
Key experience: Everything is possible in life as long as you keep fighting to reach your goal.
Main inspiration: My family and my first manager at SEB, Madeleine Stjernrup Öberg.
I try to give something extra in every meeting."
Yasser Kaddour – Customer adviser
Equipping managers
SEB's leadership philosophy has evolved in an effortto equip managers to lead in a complex and rapidly changing world. An importantrole forleaders involves building secure teams, which requires an ability for empathetic listening. Focus is on driving change, promoting innovation and ensuring thatthe corporate culture reflects the bank's values, purpose and vision.
To better understand each other and to meet customers' needs, SEB fosters diver sity and an inclusive culture at all levels of the bank and across all dimensions, regardless of gender, age, or geographic or professional background. A large number of activities have been initiated within the bank to raise awareness aboutthese issues, implement measures and follow up on progress. SEB's Board of Directors and the Group Executive Committee adopted a governance document which states that inclusion and diversity are criticalforthe bank's long-term success and that SEB can and should do betterin these areas.
Every year SEB conducts a Global Talent Review to identify individuals with poten tialfor a future key role or management position.
More than ten per cent of employees are included in this talent pool, in which they are monitored and given opportunities to broaden their networks by participating in various development projects outside oftheirregular units.
Health and work environment
SEB works long term and preventively to offer a safe and sound workplace in an effortto ensure employee well-being and a healthy work/life balance.
In Sweden, SEB's level of sick leave remains low, at 2.9 per cent, compared with otherindustries and the financial sector. In the global employee survey (Insight), SEB's index for health and work environment was nearly 10 percentage points higherthan the industry average.
Labourlaw and unions
SEB employees are covered by collective orlocal agreements. SEB has a European working council with representatives from all EU and EES countries in which SEB is represented.
Recruitment in new arenas
SEB has a strong employer brand according to annual rankings conducted among students and young professionals. This applies especially for finance and busi ness administration students. In pace with the ongoing competence shift and growing recruitment need in new compe tence areas, the bank needs to stren gthen its attractiveness among individuals that are attracted by IT companies and start-ups. Accordingly, SEB has widened its recruiting activities. The bank not only participates in traditional recruitment fairs for finance students but also uses interactivity and new formats such as invitations to hackathons and open workshops on artificial intelligence, blockchain technology and other cutting edge technologies.
SEB's core values
Customers first
We put our customers' needs first, always seeking to understand how to deliverreal value.
Commitment
We are personally dedicated to the success of our customers and are accountable for our actions.
Collaboration We achieve more working together.
Simplicity
We strive to simplify whatis complex.
SEB's core values serve as the foundation forthe bank's ways of working and culture, and in combination with the bank's vision – to deliver world-class service to our customers – they serve to motivate and inspire employees, managers and the organisation as a whole. These values are described in SEB's Code of Conduct, which provides guidance on ethical matters for all employees.
Read the Code of Conduct on sebgroup.com
Shareholders and the SEB share
In 2017 the value of the SEB Class A share increased by 1 per cent to SEK 96.30. while the OMX Stockholm 30 Index (OMXS30) increased by 4 per cent. Earnings per share amounted to SEK 7.49 (4.88). The Board proposes a dividend of SEK 5.75 per share for 2017 (5.50).
Share capital
SEB's share capital amounts to SEK 21,942m distributed on 2,194.2 million shares. Each Class A share entitles the holder to one vote and each Class C share to 1/10 of a vote.
Stock exchange trading
The SEB shares are listed on Nasdaq Stockholm, but are also traded on other exchanges, such as Chicago Board of Exchange, Boat and Turquoise.
In 2017 the value ofthe SEB Class A share increased by 1 per cent while the OMX Stockholm 30 Index (OMXS30) was up by 4 per cent and the MSCI European Banks Index increased by 10 per cent. Totalturnoverin SEB shares in 2017 amounted to SEK 312bn (307) of which 124bn (134) on Nasdaq Stockholm. Market capitalisation by year-end was SEK 211bn (210). The share is included in the Dow Jones Sustainability Index and the FTSE-4Good Index, which facilitate investments in companies which are globally recognised fortheir corporate responsibility.
Dividend policy
SEB strives to achieve long-term dividend growth without negatively impacting the group's targeted capitalratios. The annual

dividend per share shall correspond to 40 per cent or more of earnings per share. Each year's dividend is assessed in the light of prevailing economic conditions and the group's earnings, growth possibilities,regulatory requirements and capital position.
Dividend
The Board of Directors proposes to the Annual General Meeting a dividend of SEK 5.75 (5.50) per Class A and Class C share respectively for 2017, which corresponds to a 77 per cent (113) dividend payoutratio. Excluding items affecting comparability,the dividend
| Number of outstanding shares | 31 December 2017 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Share Class A |
Share Class C |
Total no. of shares |
||
| Total number ofissued shares |
2,170,019,294 | 24,152,508 | 2,194,171,802 | |
| Repurchased own shares forlong-term incentive 1) programmes |
–27,125,923 | –27,125,923 | ||
| Repurchased own shares for capital purposes 2) |
0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total number of outstanding shares |
2,142,892,371 | 24 ,152,508 | 2,167,045,879 |
1) Utilization of authorization from the Annual General Meeting
2017 to acquire own shares for long-term equity programmes.
2) 2017 AGM decision, no repurchases made.
Distribution of shares by size of holding
| Size of holding | No. of shares | Per cent | No. of shareholders |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 – 500 | 31,799,489 | 1.4 | 171,980 |
| 501 – 1,000 | 31,744,207 | 1.4 | 41,498 |
| 1,001 – 5,000 | 99,688,315 | 4.5 | 45,168 |
| 5,001 – 10,000 | 41,856,880 | 1.9 | 5,870 |
| 10,001 – 20,000 | 32,081,059 | 1.5 | 2,280 |
| 20,001 – 50,000 | 32,127,636 | 1.5 | 1,046 |
| 50,001 – 100,000 | 20,703,662 | 0.9 | 292 |
| 100,001 – 500,000 | 63,391,394 | 2.9 | 268 |
| 500,001 – 1,000,000 | 33,615,222 | 1.5 | 47 |
| 1,000,001 – | 1,807,163,938 | 82.4 | 112 |
| 2,194,171,802 | 100.0 | 268,561 |
Source: Euroclear and Holdings
Data per share
payoutratio was 70 per cent (75). The proposed record date for the dividend is 28 March 2018. Ifthe Annual General Meeting resolves in accordance with the proposal,the share
will be traded ex-dividend on 27 March 2018 and dividend payments will be disbursed on 4 April 2018.
Changes in share capital
| 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basic earnings, SEK | 7.49 | 4.88 | 7.57 | 8.79 | 6.74 |
| Diluted earnings, SEK | 7.46 | 4.85 | 7.53 | 8.73 | 6.69 |
| Shareholders' equity, SEK | 66.42 | 65.00 | 65.11 | 61.47 | 56.33 |
| Net worth, SEK | 74.84 | 73.00 | 72.09 | 68.13 | 62.10 |
| Cash flow, SEK | 13.59 | 19.02 | 1.28 | –61.98 | –19.66 |
| Dividend per A and C share, SEK |
1) 5.75 |
5.50 | 5.25 | 4.75 | 4.00 |
| 2), SEK Year-end share price |
|||||
| per Class A share | 96.30 | 95.55 | 89.40 | 99.55 | 84.80 |
| per Class C share | 96.05 | 95.20 | 88.85 | 97.65 | 79.90 |
| Highest price paid 2), SEK | |||||
| per Class A share | 109.00 | 99.75 | 111.50 100.60 | 85.10 | |
| per Class C share | 109.90 | 101.10 | 112.50 | 99.10 | 80.30 |
| Lowest price paid 2), SEK | |||||
| per Class A share | 94.05 | 67.75 | 83.45 | 82.25 | 55.70 |
| per Class C share | 95.15 | 70.35 | 83.75 | 77.45 | 53.20 |
| Dividend as a percentage of earnings (payoutratio),% |
76.7 | 112.8 | 69.4 | 54.0 | 59.3 |
| Dividend yield, % | 6.0 | 5.8 | 5.9 | 4.8 | 4.7 |
| P/E (share price at year-end/earnings) |
12.8 | 19.6 | 11.8 | 11.3 | 12.6 |
| Number of outstanding shares, million |
|||||
| average | 2,167.6 | 2,177.6 | 2,191.2 2,186.8 2,190.8 | ||
| at year-end | 2,167.0 | 2,169.0 2,193.3 2,188.7 2,179.8 |
| Year Transaction | SEK | Change in number of shares |
Accumulated number of issued shares |
Share capital SEK m |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1972 | 5,430,900 | 543 | |||
| 1975 Rights issue 1:5 | 125 | 1,086,180 | 6,517,080 | 652 | |
| 1976 | Rights issue 1:6 | 140 | 1,086,180 | 7,603,260 | 760 |
| 1977 Split 2:1 | 7,603,260 | 15,206,520 | 760 | ||
| 1981 | Rights issue 1B:10 | 110 | 1,520,652 | 16,727,172 | 837 |
| 1982 Bonus issue 1A:5 | 3,345,434 | 20,072,606 | 1,004 | ||
| 1983 Rights issue 1A:5 | 160 | 4,014,521 | 24,087,127 | 1,204 | |
| 1984 Split 5:1 | 96,348,508 | 120,435,635 | 1,204 | ||
| 1) 1986 Rights issue 1A:15 |
90 | 8,029,042 | 128,464,677 | 1,284 | |
| 1989 Bonus issue 9A+1C:10 | 128,464,677 | 256,929,354 | 2,569 | ||
| 1990 Directed issue 2) | 88.42 | 6,530,310 | 263,459,664 | 2,635 | |
| 1993 Rights issue 1:1 | 20 263,459,664 | 526,919,328 | 5,269 | ||
| 1994 Conversion | 59,001 | 526,978,329 | 5,270 | ||
| 1997 Non-cash issue | 91.30 | 61,267,733 | 588,246,062 | 5,882 | |
| 3) 1999 Rights Issue 1:5 |
35 | 116,311,618 | 704,557,680 | 7,046 | |
| 2005 Reduction ofthe share capital |
–17,401,049 | 687,156,631 | 6,872 | ||
| 2009 Rights issue 11:5 | 10 | 1,507,015,171 | 2,194,171,802 | 21,942 |
1) The recorded share capital as of 31 December 1986 was SEK 1,204m. since
the proceeds from the rights issue were not paid in full until early 1987.
2) The issue was directed at the member banks of Scandinavian Banking Partners. 3) Subscribed and paid shares were not registered as share capital in the balance sheet
until the rights issue had been registered which took place in January 2000.
Through splits in 1977 (2:1) and 1984 (5:1). the nominal value of the shares was changed from SEK 100 to SEK 10.
1) As proposed by the Board of Directors. 2) Source: Nasdaq Stockholm.
The largest shareholders 31 December 2017
| lecember 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|
| No. of shares |
Of which Class C shares |
Share of capital |
Share of votes % |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | 2017 | 2016 | |||
| Investor | 456,198,927 4,000,372 | 20.8 | 20.8 | 20.8 | |
| Alecta | 141,937,500 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 7.1 | |
| Trygg Foundation | 114,673,802 | 5.2 | 5.3 | 6.0 | |
| Swedbank Robur Funds |
102,838,285 | 4.7 | 4.7 | 4.3 | |
| AMF | 78,212,406 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.9 | |
| BlackRock | 46,151,913 | 231 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 1.7 |
| SEB Funds | 33,380,243 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.8 | |
| SEB's own 1) shareholding |
27,125,923 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | |
| Vanguard | 27,114,487 | 60,152 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Nordea Funds | 26,494,921 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.0 | |
| Fourth Swedish National Pension Fund |
25,008,002 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.2 | |
| XACT Funds | 23,298,529 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.0 | |
| First Swedish National Pension Fund |
22,773,696 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.8 | |
| Didner & Gerge Funds | 20,428,514 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | |
| AFA Insurance | 14,620,930 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
1) See table Number of outstanding shares on p. 29
Source: Euroclear and Holdings
Different voting power of class A shares (voting power 1) compared to C shares (voting power 0.1) gives differences in share of votes vs. share of capital.
Market capitalisation SEK m 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 Year-end market capitalisation1) 211,293 209,645 196,146 218,384 185,947 Volume of shares traded 123,889 133,790 142,188 113,566 94,738
1) Based on Nasdaq Stockholm share price of SEK 96.30

The majority of the banks 268,561 shareholders are private individuals with small holdings. The ten largest shareholders account for 48 per cent of capital and votes. Source: Euroclear and Holdings
The investor perspective
Overthe years SEB has capitalised on its long standing strong position as the leading corporate bank in the Nordic region and on its financial strength. Over the last five years, the share price of the SEB Class A share increased by 74 per cent while the dividend per share increased by SEK 1.751).
Long-term perspective
SEB has been the corporate bank since it was established by A. O. Wallenberg in 1856. To this day the Wallenberg family is deeply engaged in the bank's current and future operations via the main shareholderInvestor AB.
There is a clear connection between the macroeconomic development, customer activity and the development ofthe bank's earnings. SEB is focusing on growth in areas of strength – corporate business, all customer segments in Sweden and the long-term savings offering – and on transformation – to provide world-class service, increased digitalisation and competence development. These efforts will affectthe future results and therefore the market value ofthe share.
An investorin SEB believes in a positive economic development in the bank's home markets – the Nordic and Baltic countries, Germany and the United Kingdom – and in the bank's ability to capitalise on this development overtime while managing any negative developmentin an effective manner.
Return on investment
The return on an investmentin SEB is not only contributable to the share price but also to the dividend. SEB's Board of Directors has proposed to the Annual General Meeting that SEK 5.75, corre sponding to 77 per cent of earnings per share, shall be distributed

for 2017. The dividend payoutratio excluding items affecting comparability corresponds to 70 per cent.
The dividend yield, i.e.the dividend in relation to the share price at year-end 2017 was 6.0 per cent (5.8) based on the proposed dividend.
Total shareholderreturn (TSR) – i.e. share price development and reinvested dividends per share – was 6 per centfor 2017 (14). The average TSR forthe Nordic peer group in 2017 was 6 per cent (21). Overthe pastfive years, TSR forthe SEB share was 16 per cent on average.
Beta value and volatility
The beta value of SEB's share price in 2017 was 0.99 (1.17). The measure shows how the share price of a specific share moves in relation to the stock market as a whole, in this case compared to OMXS30. A beta value of 1.00 indicates thatthe share price developmentis the same as the market.
The volatility of SEB's share price was 15 per centfor 2017 (30). The corresponding value forthe Nordic peer group was 17 per cent (28). The measure shows the daily change in share price compared with its average for a given time period.
1) Based on the dividend proposal.

1) A dividend of SEK 5.75 per share is proposed for 2017.
Financialreviewofthe group
Both macroeconomic indicators and the business environment in SEB's markets were on a positive track during the year. SEB's customers in all segments increased their activity levels and the bank's operating profit, before items affecting comparability, increased by 12 per cent. SEB's financial position is strong and a dividend of SEK 5.75 per share is proposed.
Important events and trends in 2017
First quarter
- Johan Torgeby was installed as SEB's president and chief executive officer.
- Financial institutions showed a greaterinterestin sustaina ble investment opportunities.
- SEB issued its first green bond which raised EUR 500m. The funds will be used to finance customers' green efforts.
- The digital mortgage application service was launched in Sweden.See p. 20.
Second quarter
- The market volatility decreased and therefore also the previously high customer demand forrisk management services.
- SEB's new premises in Arenastaden,for more than 4,500 employees, was inaugurated.
- A new corporate cash managementfunction which offers customers a liquidity overview, including accounts in other banks, was launched.See p. 16.
Third quarter
- Forthe second yearin a row SEB qualified forinclusion in the Dow Jones Sustainability Index as the only Nordic bank.
- Remote advisory services in the Baltic countries were introduced.See p. 20.
Fourth quarter
- The business in Germany focusing on large corporate and institutional customers was transformed into a branch. See p. 34.
- An agreement was signed with Danica to sell SEB Pension in Denmark.See p. 35.
- An impairment and otheritems affecting comparability reduced the result by SEK 1,681m aftertax.See p. 34.
- SEB invited IT developers to create new solutions based on the bank's Open Banking functionality.
Full year
- The world economy was on a positive path,though the challenge ofrecord-high indebtedness remains.
- The very expansive monetary policy with negative interestrates and quantitative easing continued.
Result and profitability
Both the 2017 and 2016 results include several items affecting comparability. In orderto simplify the reporting and analysis of the result, items affecting comparability have been summarised in a new row in the income statement called Items affecting comparability. Above this row another new row called Operating profit before items affecting comparability is presented.
See p. 34 and note 49.
Operating profit before items affecting comparability increased by 12 per cent and amounted to SEK 22,702m (20,296). Items affecting comparability amounted to SEK 1,896m (5,429). Operating profit (afteritems affecting comparability) increased by 40 per cent and amounted to SEK 20,806m (14,867). Net profit increased by 53 per centto SEK 16,244m (10,618).
Operating income
Total operating income increased by 5 per cent and amounted to SEK 45,609m (43,251).
Net interest income amounted to SEK 19,893m (18,738). The Swedish repo rate was -0.5 per cent and ECB's Euro refinancing rate was zero per centthroughoutthe year which affected net interestincome negatively.
Customer-driven netinterestincome increased by SEK 1,330m to SEK 21,794m year-on-year. Lending volumes and lending mar gins contributed positively in roughly equal parts to netinterest income. Deposit margins were down due to effects from the neg ative interestrates that were not possible to reflectin customer pricing. The deposit volume effect was negligible.
Net interest income from other activities (funding, etc.) was an expense amounting to SEK 1,901m (1,726). Regulatory fees were SEK 436m higherthan 2016 and amounted to SEK 1,798m (1,362). The fees related to deposit guarantees schemes,

SEK 258m, and there was a resolution fund fee in the amount of SEK 1,540m. In 2016, the resolution fund fee of 4.5 basis points applied to the adjusted balance sheet volumes was charged, versus 9 basis points for 2017. In 2018, the fee will be 12.5 basis points.
Net fee and commission income increased by 7 per centto SEK 17,725m (16,628). Corporate customers were active in the capital markets taking advantage ofthe low interestrate levels and there were many corporate initial public offerings and mergers and acquisitions. The fees from the issue of securities and advisory fees increased by SEK 367m year-on-yearto SEK 1,167m, gross. Demand fortraditional lending was lower, especially among large corporations, and gross lending fees that amounted to SEK 2,254m were down by 11 per cent compared to 2016. Stock market values increased during the year. The market val ues and new business volumes led to an increase in gross fee income related to custody and mutualfunds in the amount of SEK 776m to SEK 8,040m. Out ofthis amount,total performance and transaction fees increased by SEK 81m to SEK 356m (275). Net payments and card fees increased by 6 per cent, SEK 191m, to SEK 3,263m year-on-year. Gross life insurance commissions related to the unit-linked insurance business increased by SEK 54m to SEK 1,707m.
Net financial income decreased by 3 per centto SEK 6,880m (7,056). In 2016, customers were seeking risk management ser vices throughoutthe turbulent year. High volatility and market activity characterised the beginning of 2017, butthese subsided to a low levelforthe rest ofthe year. The market conditions affected credit spreads and thereby the valuation of counter party risk (CVA) and own creditrisk in derivatives (DVA) as well as own creditrisk forissued bonds atfair value through profit and loss (OCA). Compared to 2016,this valuation increased by SEK 429m to SEK 210m (-219). Netfinancial income,relating to the traditional life insurance operations in Sweden and Denmark, decreased by SEK 9 per cent,to SEK 1,738m.
Holistic management
Creating sustainable value is a continuous process in an environmentthatis under constant change. The Board of Directors sets the conditions by deciding on the bank's long-term strate gic direction,financialtargets, business plans and overallrisk tolerance. Profitability targets are set within the framework ofthe risk tolerance level and the capital adequacy targets.
In orderto maximise customer and shareholder value,the financial consequences of business decisions are evaluated and operations are managed proactively based on these aspects:
-
- growth, mix and risk level of business volumes
-
- capital and liquidity requirements driven by the business 3. profitability.
Pricing in accordance with risk is thereby a natural part ofthe business and monitoring nominalreturns and risk-based return is an important part of management.
The Board's overarching risk tolerance statements convey the direction and level ofrisk,funding structure, liquidity buffers and capitaltargets. SEB's main risk is creditrisk. Other materialrisks include liquidity, market, operational (including IT and information security), business, pension and insurance risks. SEB strives to continuously identify and manage potential


Payments, cards, structured lending, deposits, guarantees and otherfees
- Custody & mutualfunds
- Secondary market & derivatives
Newissues&advisory
Life insurance income

future risks,forinstance by using stress tests and scenario analysis. The capital buffer and liquidity reserves are held to coverthe risk in case of unforeseen events.
All activities are carried outresponsibly based on economic, environmental and social aspects and in accordance with regulations and expectations – all in orderto maintain the confidence ofthe stakeholders.
Net otherincome increased by 34 per centto SEK 1,112m (829). Realised capital gains as well as unrealised valuation and hedge accounting effects were included in this line item.
Operating expenses
Total operating expenses were stable at SEK 21,936m (21,812). A 3 per cent decrease in staff costs was offset by an increase in other expenses. The average number offulltime equivalents decreased by 333 compared to 2016,to 14,946. Fees to financial supervisory authorities and otherregulatory fees amounted to SEK 168m (138). Combined with the SEK 1,798m that are accounted for as netinterest,totalregulatory fees amounted to SEK 1,966m.
The cost cap remains unchanged at SEK 22bn for 2018. Over the past eight years, SEB's cost cap has been lowered step by step from SEK 24bn.
Net credit losses
Net credit losses amounted to SEK 808m (993). Asset quality remained robust and the overall creditloss level was 5 basis points (7).
Items affecting comparability
The nettotal ofitems affecting comparabilitywas an expense of SEK1,896m(5,429).See box belowand note49.
Information on items affecting comparability
In orderto facilitate the comparison of SEB's underlying operating profit between time periods, SEB has moved items affecting comparability into a separate line in the income statement.
See note 49 for a summary and analysis of the line items in the income statement that are impacted.
2017
The total expense forItems affecting comparability in the 2017 income statement amounted to SEK 1,896m before tax and SEK 1,681m aftertax.
In total,the items affecting comparability, including an effect on other comprehensive income of SEK 494m, decreased equity by SEK 2,175m.
Visa Sweden The settlement ofthe acquisition of Visa Europe by Visa Inc. consisted of a combination of cash and shares to be paid to the different Visa Europe members. In Sweden, SEB is an indirect member. A dividend of SEK 494m was received after an agreement was reached regarding the allocation ofthe settlement between the members. There was no tax effect.
The holdings in Visa were classified as an Available-forsale asset where the change in value was recognised in Other comprehensive income. The dividend reduced the valuation amountin Other comprehensive income by SEK 494m.
SEB's German business The operations in Germany were transformed and the core business was transferred from SEB AG to the German branch ofthe parent company, Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB, as per 2 January 2018. The purpose ofthe change is to simplify the reporting and administration of

Income tax expense
Total income tax increased by 7 per cent and amounted to SEK 4,562m (4,249). The effective tax rate forthe year was 22 per cent (29), in line with SEB's expected tax rate. In both 2017 and 2016,there were tax effects from the items affecting comparability.
In 2017, new legislation was introduced in Sweden which dis continued the tax deductibility ofinterest expenses on subordi nated debtthat qualifies as Tier 1 or Tier 2 capital. This increased income tax expenses by SEK 362m.
the German operations. The business that was nottransferred to the branch will be dismantled overtime.
The provisions related to redundancy and excess premises amounted to a total of SEK 521m. In addition, SEB entered into an agreementto transferthe pension obligations underthe defined benefit plan in SEB AG to Versicherungsverein des Bankgewerbes a.G (BVV) at a total cost of SEK 891m. The transferis planned forthe second quarter 2018.
Impairment and derecognition ofIT assets An impairment and a derecognition ofintangible IT assets amounted to SEK 978m. The positive tax effect was SEK 215m.
2016
The total effect ofItems affecting comparability in 2016 was an expense in the amount of SEK 5,429m before tax and SEK 5,352m aftertax.
Visa Baltic The settlement ofthe transaction of SEB's Baltic holdings in Visa Europe resulted in a gain of SEK 520m. The gain generated a tax expense of SEK 24m.
Reorganisation and restructuring SEB implemented a new customer-oriented organisation which resulted in an impairment of goodwill in the amount of SEK 5,334m. This expense was nottax deductible.
There were financial effects from restructuring activities in the Baltic and German businesses as well as an impairment and derecognition ofintangible IT assets no longerin use. The total amount expensed was SEK 615m with a positive tax effect amounting to SEK 101m.
A dividend from the subsidiary in Estonia was taxed atthe time of pay-outto the parent company. The tax amounted to SEK 72m. See notes 3 and 15 forfurtherinformation on tax.
Profitability
Return on equity forthe full year was 11.5 per cent (7.8). Excluding items affecting comparability return on equity was 12.7 per cent (11.3).
Other comprehensive income
Other comprehensive income amounted to SEK -1,036m (-946). The value ofthe pension plan assets exceeds the defined ben efit obligations. The discountrate used forthe pension obligation in Sweden was 2.2 per cent (2.4 at year-end 2016). The net value ofthe defined benefit pension plan assets and liabilities increased during the yearleading to other comprehensive income of SEK 784m (-1,875).
The net effectfrom the valuation of balance sheetitems that may subsequently be reclassified to the income statement, i.e.the total of cash-flow hedges, available-for-sale financial assets and translation offoreign operations, was negative and amounted to SEK -1,820m (929). A dividend in the amount of SEK 494m was received from Visa Sweden (reported as an item affecting comparability).See prior page. The dividend reduced the valuation ofthe holdings in Visa Sweden, which was recog nised in the line item Available-for-sale.
Divestment of SEB Pension Denmark
On 14 December 2017 SEB signed an agreementto sell all shares in SEB Pensionsforsikring A/S and SEB Administration A/S (SEB Pension) to Danica Pension livsforsikringsaktieselskab, a subsidi ary to Danske Bank (Danica) fortotal proceeds of DKK 6.5bn, consisting of a cash consideration of DKK 5.0bn and a pre-closing dividend of DKK 1.5bn. The pre-closing dividend will be in addition to the dividend of DKK 1.1bn which SEB received in the first six months of 2017.
As per year-end 2017, assets under management by SEB Pension amounted to DKK 101bn, and the net profit contribution was DKK 490m forthe year.
The effect on SEB's key financialratios, on a pro forma basis will be limited. The Common Equity Tier 1 ratio will improve by approximately 0.6 percentage points and earnings per share will see a limited negative impact. The divestmentreduces SEB's exposure to marketrisk.
The relevantinsurance assets and liabilities were reclassified as Held for sale in the balance sheet.
Key figures
| 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on equity, % | 11.53 | 7.80 | 12.24 | 15.25 | 13.11 |
| Return on equity, excluding items affecting comparability, % | 12.67 | 11.30 | 12.85 | 13.07 | 13.11 |
| Return on total assets, % | 0.57 | 0.37 | 0.57 | 0.71 | 0.58 |
| Return on risk exposure amount, % | 2.65 | 1.80 | 2.71 | 3.23 | 2.38 |
| Basic earnings per share, SEK | 7.49 | 4.88 | 7.57 | 8.79 | 6.74 |
| Weighted average number of shares1), millions | 2,168 | 2,178 | 2,191 | 2,187 | 2,191 |
| Diluted earnings per share, SEK | 7.46 | 4.85 | 7.53 | 8.73 | 6.69 |
| Weighted average number of diluted shares2), millions | 2,178 | 2,188 | 2,203 | 2,202 | 2,207 |
| Creditloss level, % | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.09 |
| Totalreserve ratio individually assessed impaired loans, % | 55.1 | 68.8 | 68.3 | 62.2 | 86.9 |
| Netlevel ofimpaired loans, % | 0.25 | 0.21 | 0.20 | 0.29 | 0.17 |
| Gross level ofimpaired loans, % | 0.39 | 0.33 | 0.35 | 0.49 | 0.35 |
| 3), % Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) |
145 | 168 | 128 | 115 | 129 |
| Risk exposure amount, SEK m | 610,819 | 609,959 | 570,840 | 616,531 | 598,324 |
| Risk exposure amount expressed as own funds requirement, SEK m | 48,866 | 48,797 | 45,667 | 49,322 | 47,866 |
| Common Equity Tier 1 capitalratio, % | 19.4 | 18.8 | 18.8 | 16.3 | 15.0 |
| Tier 1 capitalratio, % | 21.6 | 21.2 | 21.3 | 19.5 | 17.1 |
| Total capitalratio, % | 24.2 | 24.8 | 23.8 | 22.2 | 18.1 |
| Leverage ratio, % | 5.2 | 5.1 | 4.9 | 4.8 | 4.2 |
| 4) Number offulltime equivalents |
14,946 | 15,279 | 15,605 | 15,714 | 15,870 |
| Assets under custody, SEK billion | 8,046 | 6,859 | 7,196 | 6,763 | 5,958 |
| Assets under management, SEK billion | 1,830 | 1,749 | 1,700 | 1,708 | 1,475 |
1) The number ofissued shares was 2,194,171,802. SEB owned 25,177,693 Class A shares forthe equity based programmes at year-end 2016. During 2017 SEB has purchased 6,986,000 shares and 5,037,770 shares have been sold. Thus, at 31 December 2017 SEB owned 27,125,923 Class A-shares with a market value of SEK 2,612m. 2) Calculated dilution based on the estimated economic value ofthe long-term incentive programmes.
3) According to Swedish FSA regulations forrespective period.
4) Average forthe year.
A five-year summary of the group and the parent bank's income statements and balance sheets is available on p. 164–165.
Definitions are available on p. 171–172.
Financial structure
Total assets, which at 31 December 2017 amounted to SEK 2,560bn, decreased by SEK 61bn year-on-year (2,621).
Loan portfolio
Loans to the public reported in the balance sheet amounted to SEK 1,485bn, an increase of SEK 32bn year-on-year (1,453). Excluding repos and debt securities, loans to the public increased by SEK 55bn.
The majority ofthe bank's creditrisk is summarised in the credit portfolio (in which loans, commitments and derivatives are included). Excluding banks where credit volumes are short-term and more volatile,the credit portfolio increased by SEK 25bn to SEK 2,061bn (2,036). The credit portfolio increased mainly due to growth in Swedish and Baltic household mortgage lending in the amount of SEK 22bn and Swedish housing cooperative associa tions which increased to SEK 7bn. Real estate management credits decreased by SEK 8bn year-on-year, while the corporate credits remained stable.See p. 44–49 and note 17.
Interest-bearing securities
SEB's credit exposure in the bond portfolio (interest-bearing securities and credit derivatives and futures) amounted to SEK 156bn (168).See note 17a.
Derivatives
The fair value ofthe derivative contracts is booked as assets and liabilities on the balance sheet. They amounted to SEK 105bn and SEK 85bn respectively.
The mix and volumes of derivatives reflectthe demand for derivatives by the bank's customers for management oftheir financialrisks. The bank is a market makerfor derivatives and also uses derivatives forthe purpose of protecting its own cash flows and fair value ofits financial assets and liabilities from forinstance interestrate fluctuationsSee notes 22 and 31.

Insurance assets and liabilities
Financial assets within the insurance operations amounted to SEK 305bn (404). Out ofthis,financial assets where policyhold ers carry the risk (mostly unit-linked insurance), amounted to SEK 283bn (296) and other assets (mostly traditional and risk insurance) amounted to an additional SEK 22bn (108).
Liabilities in the insurance operations amounted to SEK 303bn (404). Out ofthis, SEK 284bn (297) was related to financial com mitments forinvestment contracts (mostly unit-linked insurance), while SEK 19bn (107) was related to insurance contracts (mostly traditional and risk insurance). When the agreementto sell SEB Pension to Danica was signed the relevantinsurance assets and liabilities were reclassified as Available for sale financial assets.See p. 35.
Tangible and intangible assets
Intangible assets totalled SEK 10.7bn (11.4), of which 44 per cent represented goodwill. Goodwill items are subjectto a yearly impairmenttest and there was no impairmentin 2017. Impairment and derecognition ofintangible IT assets amounted to SEK 978m (615).See box p. 34. Deferred acquisition costs in insurance operations amounted to SEK 4.0bn (4.0). Due to the implementation ofIFRS 15 the deferred acquisition costs will decrease in 2018.See box p. 37.
Deposits, borrowings and issued securities
The financing ofthe group consists of deposits from the public (households, corporates, etc.), borrowings from financial institu tions as well as issuance of money marketinstruments, bonds, covered bonds and subordinated debt.See p. 47 and note 17f forinformation on liquidity management.
Deposits and borrowings from the public amounted to SEK 1,005bn (962). Household deposits increased by SEK 23bn while corporate deposits increased by SEK 40bn during the year.
Issued securities with short and long maturities amounted to SEK 614bn (669). During the year short-term funding in the form of commercial paper and certificates of deposit decreased by SEK 44bn. In terms oflong-term funding SEK 47bn covered bonds and SEK 28bn senior debt matured during the year. The bank was able to use its favourable position from a creditrisk point of view to raise new funding in the form of new issues of covered bonds in
Rating
Moody's rates SEB's long-term senior unsecured debt at Aa3 with a stable outlook due to SEB's asset quality, earnings stability and diversification as well as increased efficiency.
Fitch rates SEB's long-term senior unsecured debt at AAwith a stable outlook. The outlook is based on SEB's longterm strategy, earnings stability and diversification.
S&P rates SEB's long-term senior unsecured debt at A+ with a stable outlook. The outlook is based on the bank's strong capital and well diversified earnings in terms of geography and business areas.
| Moody's Outlook stable |
Standard & Poor's Outlook stable |
Fitch Outlook stable |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short | Long | Short | Long | Short | Long |
| P-1 | Aaa | A–1+ | AAA | F1+ | AAA |
| P-2 | Aa1 | A–1 | AA+ | F1 | AA+ |
| P-3 | Aa2 | A–2 | AA | F2 | AA |
| Aa3 | A–3 | AA– | F3 | AA– | |
| A1 | A+ | A+ |
the amount of SEK 55bn and SEK 20bn senior debt. SEB's inaugural own green bond in the amount of EUR 500m was part ofthe seniorfunding raised.
Issued subordinated debt amounted to SEK 32bn (41). During the year SEK 12bn subordinated debt was called and SEK 5bn additionaltier 1 subordinated debt was issued.
Total equity
Total equity atthe opening of 2017 amounted to SEK 141bn. In accordance with a resolution ofthe Annual General Meeting in 2017, SEK 11.9bn of equity was used forthe dividend (11.5). Net profit amounted to SEK 16.2bn and other comprehensive income amounted to SEK -1bn. At year-end 2017,total equity amounted to SEK 144bn. Due to changes in accounting policies in 2018, equity will decrease by around SEK 6bn, all else equal,See box below.
Dividend
TheBoardofDirectorsproposes to theAnnualGeneralMeeting adividendofSEK5.75perClassAandClassCshare respectively (5.50),whichcorresponds to a77per centpayoutratio (113).Excludingitems affectingcomparability,thepayoutratiowas70per cent (75).The totalproposeddividendamounts toSEK12.5bn (11.9), calculatedonthetotal numberofissuedshares asper31December 2017, excluding repurchasedshares.
Assets under management and custody
At year-end, assets under management amounted to SEK 1,830bn (1,749). The netinflow of volumes was SEK 14bn. The increase in value was SEK 66bn. Assets under custody amounted to SEK 8,046bn (6,859).

| Assets under management | SEK bn | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
| Start of period | 1,749 | 1,668 | 1,689 |
| Inflow | 491 | 255 | 268 |
| Outflow | –477 | –178 | –220 |
| Acquisition/disposal net | 0 | 0 | –75 |
| Change in value | 66 | 4 | 7 |
| End of period | 1,830 | 1,749 | 1,668 |
Ahead of 2018
In 2018,the bank will continue its work in accordance with the strategic direction and the business plan. A new three-year business plan for 2019–2021 will be developed.
Signs are thatthe macroeconomic development may be positive going forward. However, large global economic imbal ances remain and the potentialreduction ofliquidity supportto financial markets from central banks world-wide may create direct and indirect effects that are difficultto assess. There are signs thatthe Swedish central bank may introduce an interest rate raise in late 2018. Political uncertainty is higher after Brexit and the result of key elections in the Western world.
In SEB, credit,market, liquidity, IT and operational aswell as insurance risks affectthe business.Risk composition and risk management are described on p.44–49and in notes 17, 19and20.
Changes in accounting policies in 2018
As of 1 January 2018, IFRS 9 Financial Instruments and IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers came into force. Combined they willreduce equity by approximately SEK 6bn.See note 1 and the first interim report 2018.
IFRS 9 Financial Instruments
Regarding classification and measurement, certain holdings which have been valued atfair value throughOther comprehen sive income,will nowbe reclassified to fair value through profit or loss and presented inNetfinancial income. Some ofthese holdingswere however determined to be valued at amortised cost. The current positive fairmarket value in the amount of SEK0.3bn inOther comprehensive incomewilltherefore be removed.
Regarding financial liabilities,the rules entail a change of reporting ofthe own creditrisk adjustment (OCA). The value change in OCA was reported in Netfinancial income but will be reported in Other comprehensive income going forward. In addition, certain issued bonds will be valued atfair value through profit orloss ratherthan amortised cost. In total, equity will decrease by SEK 1.8bn.
The impairment modelfor creditlosses was changed from an incurred loss modelto an expected loss model. The impact is driven by three main factors: 1. All items in scope are each assigned a reserve going forward. 2. An increase of creditloss reserves on retail portfolios. 3. A negative scenario shall be incorporated in the calculation ofthe expected creditlosses. The change will lead to an increase ofthe creditloss reserves at an amount of SEK 1.6bn and the net effect aftertax will be a SEK 1.2bn reduction of equity. Going forward the application ofthe IFRS 9 requirements will probably increase volatility in profit and loss.
IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers
The main effectfrom IFRS 15 is that a smaller part ofthe deferred acquisition costs (DAC) within the life operations can be recognised as an asset. The change willresultin a decrease of DAC in the balance sheet of SEK 2.6bn, with a corresponding reduction on equity. Similarly, netfees and commissions in the 2017 income statement will be restated reducing income by SEK 47m.
Divisions and business support
Large Corporates& FinancialInstitutions
Corporate&
Private
Baltic
Life&Investment
Management
Customers

Head: Joachim Alpen

Co-heads: Christoffer Malmer Mats Torstendahl
Division Business offering 2017 development
The division serves 2,300 large corpo rate customers and 700 financial institu tions and offers advisory-driven commercial and investment banking services in the Nordic region, Germany, United Kingdom and through an interna tional presence. Customer-driven trading, liquidity management,financing, capital markets, custody services and asset management sales are part of the offering.
The division serves some 488,000 private and 175,000 corporate home banking customers in Sweden with full banking and advisory services through digital services and 118 branch offices. The division issues cards in the Nordic countries under SEB's own brand as well as for Eurocard and Diners Club, and offers leading private banking services to high net worth individuals.
The division provides bank products and advisory services in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania to around 920,000 private and 99,000 corporate home banking customers through mobile solutions, online as well as from the network of 78 branch offices. SEB's Baltic real estate holding companies are also part ofthe division.
Large Corporate clients increased activities gradu ally benefitting from low interestrates,favourable financing conditions and improved growth pros pects. The equity and debt capital markets were active. Customers were interested in sustainability matters where SEB is an advisor.
Financial Institutions were less active in the mar kets with low volatilities and interestrates. However, in the primary markets institutions played an impor tantrole in new issues. The complex regulatory environment drove demand for SEB's custody offering.
Private: 22,500 private customers were onboarded in the new digital process and, due to the enhancement ofthe mortgage application process,the number of applications more than doubled. The growth rate in household mortgage lending was 4.5 per cent.
Corporate: SEB launched the service concept Greenhouse,for companies with growth ambitions, where SEB provides both seminars and external partners. Corporate lending, partly driven by financing ofresidential properties, increased to SEK 221bn.
Customers increasingly used digital services. SEB held around 1,500 remote advisory sessions with high customer satisfaction and there were 250,000 bank mobile app users and 210,000 SmartID users. An EU Instant payments functionality, launched in Estonia and Latvia, and an automated credit decision process for consumerloans simplified banking for customers. Open Banking was launched with a developer portal with APIs for external parties.
The division provides life insurance and asset management solutions for corpora tions, private individuals and institutions primarily in the Nordic and Baltic regions. In Sweden the offering covers a broad range of products, now including tradi tional life insurance. The responsibility includes the management offunds and otherinvestment portfolios, where one main aspectis SEB's offering in the sustainability area.
Life:In Sweden, stepswere taken to improve the accessibility for corporate clients.Annual new sales for 2017 amounted to SEK 21bn, corresponding to a 9.4 per cent market share.An agreementto divest SEB Pensionwas signedwithDanica (see p. 35). In the Baltic region, newproductswere launched and the customer experiencewas strengthenedwithin the pension area.
Investment Management: The focus on sustainability continued, in linewith the increasing clientinterest for sustainable products.
Business Supportis a cross-divisionalfunction with the responsibility to support business oper-
The IT developmentis done step-by-step,taking small initiatives and using agile ways of work-
Reliable services are provided to SEB's customers, by ensuring that digital channels are
Head: David Teare
Head: Riho Unt
Unit Function
Business Support
Head: Martin Johansson
ations with proactive IT development and execution of back-office services as well as to ensure stable daily operations ofthe IT systems – all carried out with focus on cost efficiency. ing. In this way fast delivery and outcome in line with customer and business needs are ensured. running without disruption and payments and othertransactions are handled efficiently.
Operating income and profit (SEKbn) Comments on the result Divisions'relative share of:


Corporate&PrivateCustomers





Operating profit decreased to SEK 8,823m. Netinterestincome decreased due to an increase in resolution fund fees during the year. Netfee and commission income was higher as a result of higher activity among corporate clients. Net financial income decreased when inves tors were in a wait-and-see mode. Operating expenses were stable. Creditlosses decreased and corresponded to a credit loss level of 8 basis points.
Operating profitincreased to SEK 8,146m, mainly driven by the higher net interestincome. Netfee and commission income increased due to increased busi ness volumes overall– payments, card and from investment management related fees. Netfinancial income increased while operating expenses were largely unchanged. Creditlosses decreased and corresponded to a credit loss level of 4 basis points.
Operating profitincreased to SEK 1,977m. Netinterestincome grew due to increased volumes and higher margins on new lending. Netfee and commission income was higher as a result of overall increased customer cards and payments activity. Netfinancial income increased. Operating expenses were unchanged. Creditlosses decreased and corre sponded to a creditloss level of 1 basis point.
Operating profitincreased to SEK 3,558m. Netfee and commission income increased due to higher asset values in the investment management business during the year. Netfinancial income relating to the traditional life insurance business in Sweden and Denmark decreased. Operating expenses decreased.
The Operations unit established shared service centres in Riga and Vilnius some 10 years ago and the services provided continue to expand. Operations processes 255 million transactions per year, of which 90 per cent are fully automated. Since 2010 productivity has doubled with a smaller work force.

Operating profit 2)


Geographic markets
| Market | Development 2017 | Per country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sweden Universal banking Johan Torgeby President and CEO |
Positive macroeconomic factors and growing business volumes improved outcome in all income categories. Non-recurring costs relating to the move to new premises in Arenastaden increased operating expenses. |
Share of SEB's operating profit20171) Per cent |
|
| Estonia Universal banking Allan Parik Country manager |
2017was characterisedby strongconsumer confidence andincreasedcorporateprofitability.Privatelendingand savings volumes increasedandtowards the endofthe year corporate credits startedto grow.SEBis second biggestbank inEstonia. |
||
| Latvia Universal banking Ieva Tetere Country manager |
Both a new internet bank and new IT systems were imple- mented. The mobile app and mobile authorisations solu tions increased customer satisfaction. Overall stable economic growth resulted in higher demand forfinancing. SEB is the second biggest bank in Latvia. |
2017 Sweden 57 Denmark 8 Norway 8 |
|
| Lithuania Universal banking RaimondasKvedaras Country manager |
Steady economic growth improved the business climate and increased household mortgage demand. SEB imple- mented various digital solutions to make banking faster and simpler. Meanwhile preparations for a new core banking platform were made. SEB is the biggest bank in Lithuania. |
Finland 5 Germany 2) 4 Estonia 4 Latvia 2 Lithuania 4 Great Britain 5 |
|
| Denmark Corporate banking Peter Høltermand Country manager |
An improved business climate led to enhanced demand forinvestment banking services, while the historically low volatility led to lower activity in Markets. Investment Management continued to attractforeign inflows offunds. The divestment of SEB Pension was announced. |
Other markets 3 1) Operating profit before items affecting comparability 2) Excluding treasury operations |
|
| Norway Corporate banking William Paus Country manager |
Parts ofthe Norwegian economy developed negatively, forinstance the oil and gas industry. SEB was chosen as business partnerin refinancing and new loans by existing as well as new customers, and was involved in several large corporate transactions. |
||
| Finland Corporate banking Marcus Nystén Country manager |
Improving macroeconomic conditions had a positive effect on customer activity in all segments. Among several large transactions, SEB acted as joint global coordinatorin the largestIPO ofthe yearin the Nordic countries – Terveystalo, a health care service provider. |
||
| Germany Corporate banking Johan Andersson Country manager |
The markets were characterised by continued competition, low margins and excess liquidity. Customers focused on refinancing and bond issuing. SEB was involved in corporate transactions.See p. 34 forinformation on transforming SEB AG to a branch. |
||
| UnitedKingdom Corporate banking Mark Luscombe Country manager |
The profitable growth continued from adding new clients and deepening existing clientrelationships. UK corporate clients welcomed SEB's focused efforts and demanded all types of service offerings, butin particular capital markets products. |
||
| Other markets Corporate banking The international network |
SEB continued to serve customers in its branch offices in Luxembourg, Poland, Russia, Ukraine, China, Hong Kong, Singapore, India, United States and Brazil. |
Market shares and customer contacts
SEB's market shares
| Percent | 2017 | 2016 | Total market, SEK bn, 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lending to the public | |||
| Sweden | 14.2 | 14.4 | 5,965 |
| lending to households | 12.7 | 13.2 | 3,792 |
| lending to companies | 16.8 | 16.4 | 2,173 |
| Estonia1) | 25.0 | 23.2 | 179 |
| Latvia1) | 18.2 | 16.7 | 145 |
| Lithuania1) | 29.4 | 29.6 | 186 |
| Deposits from the public | |||
| Sweden | 15.6 | 15.7 | 2,771 |
| deposits from households | 11.5 | 11.6 | 1,776 |
| deposits from companies | 22.8 | 23.6 | 995 |
| Estonia1) | 22.0 | 22.5 | 170 |
| Latvia1) | 12.0 | 10.5 | 200 |
| Lithuania1) | 27.0 | 27.6 | 184 |
| Equity trading | |||
| Stockholm | 5.5 | 6.0 | 8,338 |
| Oslo | 3.1 | 3.1 | 2,217 |
| Helsinki | 2.7 | 2.5 | 2,618 |
| Copenhagen | 2.4 | 2.9 | 3,813 |
| SEK-denominated corporate bonds | 16.5 | 16.7 | 149 |
| Mutualfunds,total volumes2) | |||
| Sweden | 11.9 | 11.9 | 4,018 |
| Finland | 2.8 | 3.0 | 1,142 |
| Unit-linked insurance, premium income | |||
| Sweden | 16.3 | 16.8 | 65 |
| Life insurance, premium income | |||
| Sweden | 7.8 | 8.7 | 211 |
| Denmark | N/A | 8.9 |
1) Excl.financial institutions & leasing. Estonia and Latvia per November 2017, Lithuania per September 2017.
2) Excluding third-party funds.
Sources: Statistics Sweden, Bank of Estonia, Financial and Capital Market Commission in Latvia, Association of Lithuanian Banks, Swedish Insurance Federation, Nasdaq etc.
Customer contacts
| 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of syndicated loans in Nordic countries |
61 | 73 | 65 |
| Number of equity capital market transactions in the Nordic region |
31 | 24 | 19 |
| Number of Nordic mergers and acquisitions | 16 | 24 | 17 |
| International private banking branches | 12 | 12 | 12 |
| Number of Swish payments via SEB's app (million) | 28 | 18 | 8 |
| Online bank, number of visits (million) | 148 | 174 | 158 |
| Mobile bank, number oflogins (million) | 184 | 129 | 100 |
| Telephone bank, number of calls (million) | 4.6 | 4.4 | 4.3 |
| Number oflife insurance intermediaries and brokers |
2,200 | 2,500 | 2,550 |
| Number of branch offices | 196 | 219 | 252 |
| Number of ATMs 1) | 2,649 | 2,757 | 2,640 |
1) whereof 1,900 jointly owned by major Nordic banks

Total household savings - savings accounts, mutualfunds,traditional and unitlinked insurance and bonds but excluding directly owned equities – in Sweden amounted to SEK 8,583bn as of 31 December 2017 (traditional insurance per 30 September, 2017).
Market shares, Sweden Per cent

Profitrelated to business volumes
Customers' financial needs are the source of SEB's business volumes and result. The general relationships between customer-driven business volumes on- and off-balance sheet, the income statement and external factors are outlined below.
The macroeconomic situation is of greatimportance for customer behaviour and,together with the bank's own actions, itis a major factorimpacting the business and the result.
In times of positive economic development both businesses and private individuals are more likely to invest and consume. This may lead to increased lending, more payments, a higher number of corporate transactions, etcetera, all of which affect netinterest and net commission income positively.
In an unfavourable part ofthe business cycle, customers may be more restrictive and growth in business and transaction vol umes may level out while creditlosses may increase. On the other hand customers hedge theirrisks in uncertain and volatile times, which may increase netfinancial income.
SEB's totalresultis less volatile overtime than each line item in the income statement stand-alone. Forinstance netfee commis sion income tends to increase when financial income decreases and vice versa.
| Income statement, simplified | SEK m | |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | ||
| A | Netinterestincome | 19,893 |
| B | Netfee and commission income | 17,725 |
| C | Netfinancial income | 6,880 |
| D | Net otherincome | 1,112 |
| Total operating income | 45,609 | |
| Total operating expenses | –21,936 | |
| 2 3 4 5 |
Creditlosses and other | – 970 |
| Operating Profit Before IAC | 22,702 | |
| Items affecting comparability | – 1,896 | |
| Operating profit | 20,806 | |
| Income tax expense | – 4,562 | |
| Net profit | 16,244 |
Business volumes on the balance sheet 1) SEK m
| ASSETS | 2017 | LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Central banks | 190,000 | 12 Central banks | 44,243 |
| 2 Loans to other creditinstitutions | 34,715 | 13 Deposits from creditinstitutions | 44,833 |
| 3 of which Debt securities |
0 | 14 Deposits and borrowings from the public | 1,004,721 |
| 4 Loans to the public | 1,484,803 | 15 Liabilities to policyholders | 303,202 |
| 5 of which Debt securities |
13,030 | 16 Commercial papers/Certificates of deposit | 83,069 |
| 6 Debt securities | 109,513 | 17 Long-term debt | 530,964 |
| 7 Equity instruments | 48,371 | Debt securities issued | 614,033 |
| 8 Derivatives | 104,868 | 2) 18 Debtinstruments |
10,809 |
| 9 Insurance assets | 313,203 | 2) 19 Equity instruments |
14,228 |
| Financial assets atfair value | 575,955 | 20 Derivatives and other | 89,275 |
| 10 Debt securities | 25,824 | Financial liabilities atfair value | 114,313 |
| 11 Equity instruments | 1,952 | Otherliabilities | 257,935 |
| Available-for-sale financial assets | 27,776 | 21 Subordinated debt | 32,390 |
| Other assets | 246,347 | Total equity | 143,925 |
| TOTAL ASSETS | 2,559,596 | TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | 2,559,596 |
1) From 2018 the balance sheet presentation will change due to the implementation ofIFRS 9.
See p. 37, note 1 and the first quarterly reportfor 2018.
2) Short position – a negative item in the inventory held for customertrades
Selected business volumes outside the balance sheet (in accordancewith accounting principles) SEK bn
| 2017 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 22 | Assets under | Customers investin forinstance mutual | |
| management | funds | 1,830 | |
| 22 | Assets under |
The bank safekeeps securities and collects dividends and interest on |
|
| custody | customers' behalf | 8,046 | |
| 22 | Commitments | Preapproved customer credits | 563 |
| 22 | Guarantees | The bank assists customers with credit | |
| risk management | 123 |
| 22 | Payments and cash management |
Customers make payments and manage account balances. |
|---|---|---|
| 22 | Card transactions Customers make card payments. | |
| 22 | Securities transactions |
Customers use the bank as an intermediary in securities transactions,forinstance equities. |
| 22 | Corporate transactions |
Corporate customers seek advice and assistance for various corporate transactions, such as acquisitions, IPOs etc. |
Customers' business volumes and income
| A Netinterestincome |
Netfee and B commission income |
C Netfinancial income |
D Net otherincome |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Netinterestincome is the differ ence between income from lend ing and expenses associated with deposits and borrowings. Margins and business volumes have a major bearing. Interest margins differin various markets, mainly due to varying maturities and risk. |
Netfee and commission income increases with growing transac- tion volumes. Fund-related commissions increase with higher market values. |
Netfinancial income is driven by both the market value and realised gains and losses on transactions with securities, currencies and derivatives . The trend in the finan- cial markets plays a majorrole. |
Items in net otherincome occur sporadically with no clearlink to macroeconomic factors. |
|
| Customerloans generate interest income overthe life ofthe transac- tion. Up-frontfees on new loans are treated as interestincome. 1 2 4 |
SEB participates in, orleads, syndications ofloans leading to netfee and commission income or expenses. 4 |
Loa ns |
||
| SEB maintains an inventory of debt instruments – interest-bearing securities and bonds – for customertrades and liquidity management. They accrue interest 6 10 18 1) overlife. 3 5 |
SEB holds debtinstruments for customertrading and liquidity management. The customertrad ing activity as well as the market value ofthe inventory affect net financial income. 6 18 1) |
Sales from the bank's inventory of debtinstruments held forliquidity management orinvestment affect this item. 3 5 10 |
inst rum Deb t ent s |
|
| Brokerage fees occurin equity trading. 22 |
SEB holds equity instruments for customertrading and is a counter- partin equity swaps. The customer trading,the market value and divi dends affectthis item. 7 19 1) |
Sales from the bank's equity hold ings and dividends affectthe item. 11 |
Inst Equ rum ity ent s |
|
| Interestrate derivatives that are used by SEB to reduce volatility in the result (so-called hedging) accrue interest overlife. 8 20 |
In certain cases, SEB charges and pays fees when trading in deriva tives. 8 20 |
SEB is a counterparty for custom- ers wishing to manage risk (for instance foreign exchange and interestrate risk) using derivative instruments. Both customertrades and the market value ofthe hold ings affectfinancial income. 8 20 |
The market value of derivatives that SEB uses for hedging. 8 20 |
Der ivat ives |
| Customer deposits generate inter est expense 12 13 14 |
Certain bank accounts generate fee income. 14 |
bor Dea row pos nd ings its |
||
| SEB provides savings in unit-linked insurance, depositinsurance and similar products where the customer bears the risk. Invested volumes generate fee income. In addition, distribution generates fee expenses. 9 15 22 |
SEB provides savings in traditional pension with a certain guaranteed return, sickness and health insur- ance and related services. The item depends on the invested volumes as well as the outcome ofinsurance claims. 9 15 |
Insu ran ce and sav ings |
||
| SEB's operations are funded by long and short-term interest-bear ing securities, all of which generate interest expense. 16 17 21 |
Index-linked bonds generating fee income are provided forthe purpose of customerinvestment. 16 17 |
The market value including the creditrisk in SEB's issued index- linked bonds affects the item. 17 |
Early redemption by SEB ofits debt instruments affects this item. 16 17 21 |
and Issu sub ed de sec ord bt urit inat ies ed |
| Various customer services are provided which generate both fee and commission income and expense. Mostfees are fixed and transaction based; some are market value based. 22 |
Bus bal out ines anc sid s e vol e she the um et es |
1) Short position – a negative item in the inventory held for customertrades.
Risk, liquidity and capital management
SEB works to safeguard its strong financial position in order to meet customers' and other stakeholders' needs. Assuming risk is an integral part of banking, and risk, liquidity and capital management enables the bank to create customer value while maintaining resilience in all potential circumstances.
Risk review 2017
SEB continued to demonstrate its resilience with continued high asset quality and low creditlosses, a stable liquidity position and robust capital adequacy.
The global economic development was positive despite the prevailing geopolitical uncertainty. Economic growth was driven by increased employment, high asset prices, more investments
and trade, and the financial markets continued to develop positively. Atthe same time, large global economic imbalances remain. The reduction of central banks' liquidity supportto finan cial markets worldwide may create direct and indirect effects that are difficultto assess. Record high indebtedness, demographic headwinds and new,transforming technologies add to uncertainties in the market.
| Risk profile | The Board of Directors decides on the overarching risk tolerance. The Presidentis responsible for optimising the risk profile within to the Board's risk tolerance and capital adequacy targets and to manage SEB's risks overall. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Board's risk tolerance statements in brief SEB shall: |
Comment | |||
| Creditrisk and asset quality |
Have a robust credit culture based on long term relationships, knowledge aboutthe customers and focus on theirrepayment ability. This will lead to a high quality credit portfolio. |
• SEB has a well-balanced credit portfolio with main exposure to Nordic large corporates and households in Sweden. • Asset quality remains strong with low creditlosses. Over the pastten years, which includes the Baltic crisis, annual creditlosses have averaged 0.17 per cent oflending. |
||
| Marketrisk | Achieve low earnings volatility by gener- ating revenues based on customer-driven business. |
• SEB takes marketrisk in customer-driven trading activity and in its liquidity portfolio. Generally, SEB's marketrisk is low. • Interestrate risk arises due to mismatches in rates and maturities in the bank's assets and liabilities, and is managed by the Treasury function. |
||
| Operational and reputationalrisk |
Strive to mitigate operationalrisks in all business activities and maintain the bank's reputation. |
• SEB has historically reported operational losses below European peer average. • Managing and mitigating IT and cyberrisks is a key priority to ensure secure and available information, services and products for customers. |
||
| Liquidity and funding risk |
Have a soundly structured liquidity posi tion, a balanced wholesale funding depend ence and sufficientliquid reserves to meet potential net outflows in a stressed scenario. |
• SEB's primary funding sources are customer deposits and wholesale funding. • The funding base is diversified in terms of maturities and currencies to ensure that payment obligations are met as they fall due. |
||
| Aggregated risk and capital adequacy |
Maintain satisfactory capital strength in orderto sustain aggregated risks, and guarantee the bank's long-term survival and its position as a financial counterparty, while operating safely within regulatory require ments and meeting rating targets. |
• SEB is strongly capitalised in relation to regulatory capitalrequirements, internaltargets and peers. • The aim is to hold capital adequacy of around 150 basis points above the regulatory requirement. |
The implementation of new regulations in the financial industry continues to be intensive and a number ofregulatory requirements take effectin 2018. After several years of dialogue,the Basel Committee published its revised Basel IIIframework. While the revised framework reduces the degree offreedom in the internal modelling of capitalrequirements,the outcome was not as negative forthe banking industry as initially apprehended.
Digitalisation in the banking industry is accelerating driven by technological advances, customers' expectations and regulations. Newtypes of competitors are emerging and amovementtowards Open Banking and sharing ofinformation and infrastructurewill reshape the current playing field for banks.Apartfromthe strate gic risk this entails, cyberthreats are expected to continue to
evolve as attacks becomemore technically sophisticated and the attack surface expandswith the progress of digitalisation.
Stable credit portfolio with little change in total corporate lending
SEB's credit portfolio,totalling SEK2,151bn (2,143),remained stable during the yearwith growthmainly in Swedish householdmortgage lending and financing to housing co-operative associations, aswell as in private and corporate lending in theBaltic region.
In the prevailing market environment, large corporate cus tomers took advantage of attractive capitalmarkets forrefinancing, which led to a subdued demand fortraditional bank lending. SEB's corporate portfolio remained almost unchanged at SEK 1,030bn
| SEB's key risk development Measurement |
5-year average1) | 2017 | Peer average 4) Measurement |
2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Credit portfolio (SEK bn) Net creditloss level (%) |
2,063 0.07 |
2,151 0.05 |
Net creditloss level (%) | 0.10 |
| TradingVaR average (SEK m) | 112 | 91 | TradingVaR average 5) (SEK m) |
149 |
| Operational losses 2) /income (%) |
0.58 | 0.45 | Operational losses 2)/income (%) |
0.72 |
| Liquidity coverage ratio (%) Core gap ratio (%) |
127 113 |
145 108 |
Liquidity coverage ratio 3) (%) | 151 |
| Risk exposure amount (SEK bn) Common equity tier 1 ratio (%) Leverage ratio (%) Creditrating |
605 17.7 4.6 n.a. |
611 19.4 5.2 Aa3/A+ |
Common equity tier 1 ratio (%) Leverage ratio (%) |
20.2 5.3 |
1) The number of measuring points during the period vary
2) Fourth quarter 2016–third quarter 2017, ORX
3) SHB, Nordea and Swedbank, who calculate according to the Swedish FSA's method 4) Danske Bank, SHB, Nordea, Swedbank and DNB 5) Danske Bank, SHB, Nordea and Swedbank. Average VaR recalculated to 10-day 99% confidence interval


(1,029) as of year-end,representing 48 per cent ofthe credit portfolio. SEB is unique among peers in thatits corporate portfolio consists primarily oflarge counterparties – mainly Nordic and German customers in a wide range ofindustries,the largest being manufacturing. The exposure to small and medium-sized compa nies (SME) accounts for 12 per cent (11) ofthe bank's corporate portfolio, and is mainly in Sweden. Exposure to this segment was unchanged during the year.
Strong growth in the Baltics
The Baltic economies developed favourably as a result of growing exports, investments and private consumption. SEB's Baltic portfolio continued to grow steadily, particularly in Estonia and Lithuania, and opportunities arose from the consolidation ofthe banking market. At year-end,the Baltic portfolio amounted to SEK 166bn (148). The portfolio consists mainly of corporate and household exposures, while the real estate management portfolio is limited.
Swedish household mortgage portfolio
SEB takes a long-term, sustainable perspective in its household mortgage lending. Lending is based on the borrower's repayment capacity, including the ability to manage an interestrate of seven per cent, and new mortgage loans cannot normally exceed five times the household's gross income. SEB was the first Swedish bank to introduce amortisation requirements for mortgages with loan-to-value (LTV) ratios above 70 per centin 2015. In 2017, 83 per cent of all new loans with an LTV above 50 per cent contained an amortisation plan.
SEB's Swedish household mortgage portfolio grew by 4 per cent overthe year, compared to market growth of 7 per cent. The portfolio, which amounted to SEK 478bn (461), is of high asset quality with strong repayment ability among customers, low historical creditlosses and sound LTV ratios. Property values are continuously assessed and monitored.

The Swedish housing market
The Swedish residential housing market has been characterised by urbanisation, limited supply of new housing and low interestrates. As a result, housing prices have risen quickly especially in the pastfive years and household indebtedness is high in a global comparison. Accordingly, public debate has focused on overheating risks. In the second half ofthe year, the Swedish housing market saw signs of normalisation, driven by a larger supply of homes for sale as newly produced homes came to the market and the Swedish FSA's announcement of a furthertightening of amortisation requirements which willtake effectin March 2018. Although households in Sweden gener ally have a high level ofindebtedness,they have low default probability. Household borrowing has increased but so has savings, leaving households with strong balance sheets while interest expenses as a portion of household income is at a record -low level. In addition, according to Swedish regulations, debtin excess of collateral value is not written offin the case of default, which makes borrowers likely to continue to amortise. A price fall is more likely to affect private consumption and thus the economy as a whole.
High quality real estate portfolio
SEB's residentialreal estate portfolio is mainly in Sweden and consists of high quality, private and publicly owned real estate companies as well as institutional investors in the sector. The portfolio was stable at SEK 108bn as of year-end (109).
Credit demand was lowerin the commercialreal estate sector due to favourable financing opportunities in the capital markets. SEB's exposure to commercialreal estate consists mainly of strong counterparties with sound financing structures in the Nordic region. The value ofthe portfolio declined to SEK 179bn (185) due to a strategic reduction in Germany.
For several years, SEB has governed its exposure to the real estate sector by a group-wide risk tolerance levelforthe com mercialreal estate portfolio, divisional volume growth limits as well as a firm creditreal estate policy set by the Board.
High asset quality
Asset quality of the credit portfolio remained high and credit losses continued to be low at SEK 808m (993) or a net credit loss level of 5 basis points (7). Non-performing loans amounted to SEK 8.3bn (7.6), corresponding to 0.5 per cent of total lending.
Low marketrisk in relatively calm financial markets
The risk in the customer-driven trading is measured as Value-at-Risk (VaR), which averaged SEK 91m (112) in 2017. This means that, on average,the bank is not expected to lose more than this amount during a period often trading days, with 99 per cent probability. VaR was relatively stable during the year as the volatility across all asset classes continued to be limited while exposure from equity options was reduced. Towards the end ofthe year,tighter credit spreads and smaller FX exposures also contributed to lower VaR.
Main marketrisk in life insurance operations lies with customers
SEB's life insurance business consists mainly of unit-linked products, where the marketrisk remains with the customer. In 2017, unit-linked products represented 67 per cent oftotal premium income. SEB also offers traditional insurance, occupational pension and private health insurance in Sweden and Denmark. In the traditional insurance portfolios, buffers consisting of assets less guaranteed benefits serve as protection againstinsurance risk for SEB. The buffers increased throughoutthe year as a result of assetreturns and new business. An agreementto sellthe Danish life insurance business was signed in 2017.See p. 35.
A sound liquidity and funding strategy
Access to liquidity and funding markets is vital in all circumstances. SEB's liquidity and funding strategy is managed from three perspectives: (1) optimising the liquidity structure ofthe balance sheetto ensure thatless liquid assets are matched with stable funding, (2) monitoring wholesale funding dependence,

Each business unitis responsible forthe risks ittakes – the firstline of defence. Long-term customerrelationships and a sound risk culture provide a solid foundation for SEB's risk-taking decisions. Initialrisk assessments are made of both the customer and the proposed transaction. The business units ensure thattransactions are correctly priced and thatthe assumed risks are managed throughoutthe life ofthe transaction. Largertransactions are reviewed by a credit committee. The business units are responsible for ensuring thatthe activities comply with applicable group-wide policies and instructions and are supported by a clear decision-making hierarchy. Three lines of defence in risk management 1
The risk and compliance functions constitute the second line of defence. These units are independentfrom the business. The risk function is responsible foridentifying, measuring, monitoring and reporting risks. Risks are measured both on detailed and aggregated levels. Internal measurement models have been developed forthe majority ofthe credit portfolio as well as for market and operationalrisk and are approved by the Swedish FSA for calculating capitalrequirements. Risks are controlled through limits attransactional, desk and portfolio levels. Asset quality and the risk profile are monitored continuously,for example through stress testing.

2
The compliance function works proactively to ensure the quality of compliance at SEB, and focuses on issues such as customer protection, conductin the financial market, prevention of money laundering and financing ofterrorism as well as regulatory systems and controls.
Internal Auditis the third line of defence. SEB's risk managementis regularly reviewed and evaluated by Internal Audit to ensure thatitis adequate and effective. The internal auditors are in turn evaluated by the external auditor. Based on the evaluations ofthe third line of defence,the processes in the first and second lines of defence are continuously strengthened. SEB's governance framework, sound risk culture and business acumen constitute the cornerstones of effective risk management.
and (3) ensuring thatthe bank has sufficientliquidity to withstand a severely stressed scenario.
In 2017, SEB saw continued strong market demand forits new issues of short- and long-term funding. SEB's liquidity reserve, as defined by the Swedish Bankers' Association, amounted to SEK 340bn (427) at year-end. The size and composition ofthe liquidity reserve is regularly analysed and assessed against estimated needs.
The Swedish FSA's Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) measures to what extentliquid assets are sufficientto cover short-term cash outflows in a stressed scenario. SEB's ratio amounted to 145 per centin aggregate (168), and 284 (305) and 217 (272) for US dollars and euros,respectively. This is in compliance with the Swedish FSA's minimum requirement of 100 per cent.
The Core Gap Ratio, which is SEB's internal measure ofthe extentto which long-term lending is matched by long-term fund ing, was 108 per cent (114), which is well within the bank's risk tolerance of a sound liquidity structure. SEB also manages its liquidity position in line with the upcoming regulatory Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) requirement of 100 per cent, which is now anticipated to be effective as of 2021.
A high creditrating is important as it sets the costfor SEB's marketfinancing. SEB's creditrating is currently Aa3/A+.
Low losses from operational incidents
Operationalrisks are an inherent part of all businesses. SEB continuously works to minimise operational losses and, in particular,to avoid largerloss incidents. By continuously improv ing governance and risk practices in the operationalrisk managementframework,the bank strives to mitigate both existing and emerging risks. Important processes and tools include a New Product Approval Process (NPAP), business continuity management,risk and control self-assessments, as well as identity access management. In addition, employees are continuously trained within important areas such as information security, fraud prevention, anti-money laundering and Know-Your- Customer (KYC) processes.
SEB's reputation is built on long-term customerrelationships and a strong risk culture based on business acumen and professional conduct. SEB's Code of Conduct and core values, manda tory training, and dialogues on ethical and value-related dilemmas strengthen awareness ofthe importance of conduct among employees. Through an external whistle-blowing procedure, employees and others are encouraged to report unethical and illegal incidents.
Netlosses from operational incidents amounted to SEK 185m (263) in 2017. Benchmarking against members ofthe Operational Risk Data eXchange Association (ORX) shows that SEB's opera tional losses are below peer average.
Cyber security and IT risk management
Reliable and secure services and products are a key priority for SEB. Digital channels mustrun without disruption and transac tions must be processed correctly and safely. Customer data must be handled in a safe way. SEB is continuously developing and modernising the IT environmentto supportthe increasing digitalisation of services.
In its "always open" ambition,the bank is working on several measures to reduce and preventthe risk of downtime. Among otherthings,firebreaks are builtinto the IT infrastructure, which help limit a potential problem to one system only.
SEB's approach to meeting cyber and other security threats is to prioritise technical protection and to raise awareness among both employees and customers. Necessary security updates, system upgrades, and implementation of new features are per formed on a regular basis.
The regulatory framework for personal data protection (GDPR) is becoming stricter and atthe same time rules (PSD2) on open ing bank systems for access in new ways are being introduced in 2018. SEB is continuously adjusting to existing and upcoming requirements in these areas.See p. 50.
Sustainability and climate-related risks in focus
Extreme weather conditions, as well as long-term climate-related changes are becoming an increasingly importantrisk factorin the financial sector.Moretransparencyon climate-relatedrisks is requestedby customersandinvestors, andregulators are expected to take environmentalrisks into accountin their supervision.
Environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks have always been considered in SEB's credit analysis and credit granting. In 2017, SEB continued to develop tools forits ESG risk analysis. Since several years, SEB applies a number of sector policies that limitlending to companies in certain sectors, such as fossilfuels, mining and metals. SEB does not provide new financing of coal mining and coal power plants. SEB's fund company continued to reduce the coal exposure in its funds in 2017.
The bank alsoworked to influence power companies to find other sources of energy than combustion coal. SEBhas signed the international climate agreementMontreal Carbon Pledge,where part ofthe commitmentis to reportthe carbon footprintfrom equity funds annually, and since2017, SEBis reporting carbon emissions related to themajority ofits equity funds.See p.71.
Risk related to violation of human rights
Respecting and promoting human rights is an obligation of all responsible businesses. SEB assesses the risk for violation of human rights, and acts to prevent and remedy possible related negative consequences. A customer with poor human rights ambitions can quickly become a high creditrisk forthe bank. There is also a high reputationalrisk in investing in such compa nies forfund management purposes. This risk is monitored in the KYC-process, in screening of new suppliers, as well as in the bank's financing and investment processes.
Preventing corruption,
money laundering and terrorism financing
SEB actively counteracts allforms of corruption, in line with rules and regulations, and does nottolerate to be involved in or associated with bribes. Itis of utmostimportance for SEB to know its customers and to understand the risk of being used for money laundering and terrorism financing.
The bank believes that a diligentKYC process is the bestmethod for preventingmoney laundering and financing ofterrorism. Enhanced due diligence is applied for customers, products and countrieswhere the bank is believed to bemost exposed. Following EU's FourthAnti-Money LaunderingDirective, SEB has updated


and strengthened internal controls and procedures aswell as increased its focus on employee training. SEB uses a globalmonitoring systemto detect suspicious transactions and behaviours in defined higherrisk areas. Information fromthe business is of great importance and remains the leading source in the reporting to the relevant authorities. The number ofreports to the financial intelligence unit ofthe Swedish policewas around 500 in 2017.
Capital adequacy exceeds requirements
Despite strong risk management and risk culture, unexpected losses occurin banking. SEB's capital management shall ensure thatthe bank has sufficient capitalto absorb such unexpected losses. The Board of Directors sets SEB's capitaltargettaking into consideration financial stability requirements by the regulators, debtinvestors, business counterparties, as well as the Board's view of capital need and debtrating ambitions. This needs to be balanced with the shareholders'required rate ofreturn.
The Swedish FSA's requirementforthe Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capitalratio consists of Pillar 1, which is a general minimum requirementfor all banks, and Pillar 2, which is a specific requirement based on an assessment of SEB's risk, liquidity and capital position made in the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process.

Development ofrisk exposure amount (REA) SEK bn
SEB estimates the Swedish FSA's CET1 capitalrequirementto 17.2 per cent as of year-end 2017.
Other exposures Additionalrisk exposure amount
The Board's targetis to maintain a CET1 capitalratio of around 150 basis points above the Swedish FSA's requirement. This con stitutes a buffer against potential variability in the capital position deriving, in particular,from changes in foreign exchange rates and interestrate risk in the pension obligations. This means that the CET1 capitalratio target currently is around 18.7 per cent.
The CET 1 capital base increased to SEK 119bn (114) while the risk exposure amount (REA) increased slightly to SEK 611bn (610). The capitalrequirements for Swedish banks are currently signifi cantly higherthan EU minimum levels and the Swedish banks are well capitalised compared with banks elsewhere in Europe, both from a risk-weighted and non-risk-weighted perspective. At yearend SEB's CET1 capitalratio amounted to 19.4 percent (18.8), which is above regulatory requirements and the Board's target.
SEB's leverage ratio, a non risk-based ratio between Tier 1 capital and assets, was 5.2 per cent at year-end (5.1), above the proposed minimum requirement of 3 per cent.
Update on regulatory requirements affecting capital
IFRS 9 and IFRS 15
The new accounting standard, IFRS 9, Financial Instruments, is effective as ofthe beginning of 2018. It entails a change of methodology for creditimpairment accounting in which loan loss provisions are based on an 'expected loss' conceptratherthan the current'incurred loss', which increased the creditloss reserves. The new rules also led to valuation effects in some assets and liabilities.
The new accounting standard, IFRS 15, Revenues from Con tracts with Customers, is effective as ofthe beginning of 2018. Among otherthings, itlimits the amountthat can be recognised as deferred acquisition costs.
As a result ofthe adjustments that will be necessary, SEB's equity will decrease by around SEK 6bn.See box p. 37.
EU's Bank Recovery and Resolution
The EU's Bank Recovery and Resolution directive was imple mented into Swedish law in 2016. It sets the crisis management procedure forfailing banks. The law also covers the bail-in tool and introduces a minimum requirementfor own fund and eligible liabilities (MREL). In 2017,the Swedish National Debt Office (Riks gälden) presented the Swedish MREL framework, which includes
a requirementfor subordination of debtthat may be bailed-in. The requirementis effective from 2018 and banks are expected to progressively build up the required volume of subordinated liabilities until 1 January 2022 atthe latest. For SEB this would entail SEK 90bn.
Basel III
The major part ofthe revised Basel IIIframework was finalized in 2017,resulting in a limitation ofthe benefits in terms of capital requirement when using internalratings-based risk measurement models. SEB has started to assess the capital effect ofthe revised framework, but due to finalisation of certain issues,the adaptation to national supervisory regimes, and the long imple mentation period from 2022 to 2027,the final effectis still not clear.
In a parallel initiative,the European Banking Authority (EBA) is,together with national supervisors,trying to harmonise and reduce variation in the implementation ofinternal models. EBA proposes to introduce requirements on definitions and model parameters, and prescribe more detailed requirements on deci sion processes. Banks are expected to comply in one to three years.
Regulatory requirements
In 2017, the implementation of established new regulatory requirements
culminated, while the stream of proposed new rules receded. New anti-money laundering requirements were implemented at the same time as extensive work was done to prepare for MiFID II, MiFIR, IFRS 9, GDPR and PSD 2, which all started to apply in 2018.
SEB continuouslymonitors regulatory development atthe global, European and national levels. This work is conducted through own activities and through contacts with Swedish and foreign regula tors and legislators, as well as via Swedish and international industry organisations, such as the Swedish Bankers'Association, the Swedish SecuritiesDealersAssociation and the Institute ofInternational Finance.
In 2017,the bank worked with 26 large regulatory projects at an estimated total cost of atleast SEK 685m. In addition,the bank is implementing technicalrequirements and guidelines from the three European supervisory authorities for banking, insurance and securities markets.
Main areas and aims ofregulation
1 2 3 Financial stability Ensure thatthe finan cial system can withstand economic shocks and disturbances as well as preventthatthe failure of one financial institution leads to a systemic collapse.
Market conduct Promote efficient price setting and execution in financial markets, and prevent market manipulation through enhanced transparency and improved risk mitigation.
Consumer protection
Ensure fairtreatment of customers and increase theirfinancial literacy through relevant and correctinformation. This entails requirements in terms of marketing and packag ing offinancial services and investment advice services.
New regulatory requirements coming into force 2017–2018 1)
| Financial stability | |
|---|---|
| VINN – Reporting of securities | |
| IFRS 9 – Accounting rules forfinancial instruments | |
| IFRS 15 – Accounting rules forrevenue from contracts with customers | |
| KRITA/AnaCredit – Reporting of corporate loans | |
| IFRS 16 – Accounting rules forleases | |
| BCBS 239 – Principles for Effective Risk Data Aggregation and Reporting | |
| Market conduct | |
| PAD – Payment Accounts Directive | |
| AML 4 – Anti-Money Laundering Directive | |
| MiFID II / MiFIR – Markets in Financial Instruments Directive & Regulation | |
| Financial benchmarks regulation | |
| PSD 2 – Payment Services Directive | |
| MMF – Money Market Funds regulation | |
| CSDR – Central Securities Depositories Regulation | |
| IORP 2 – Institutions for Occupational Retirement Provisions Directive | |
| SFTR – Securities Financing Transactions Regulation | |
| Consumer protection | |
| PRIIPs – Packaged Retail and Insurance-Based Investment Products Regulation | |
| GDPR – General Data Protection Regulation | |
| IDD – Insurance Distribution Directive | |
| 2017 | 2018 |
1) The implementation work continues through the phase-in period, if any, and sometimes beyond.
50 SEB Annual Report 2017
High-impact regulations
Certain new regulations – in the areas offinancial stability, market conduct and consumer protection – have particularly large impact on the bank's result as well as on its operations.
Financial stability 1
Accounting and valuation rules – IFRS 9
In 2018,the new internationalfinancialreporting standard, IFRS 9 – Financial Instruments, came into force. Based on the experience from the 2007–2008 financial crisis. Among many otherthings IFRS 9 requires banks to make reserves for its expected creditlosses through the life ofthe credit, with estimates based on probability of default and forward looking macroeconomic scenarios. As a consequence ofthe new
accounting rules,the reported results will be more dependent on assumptions aboutthe macroeconomic development and may be more volatile.
Implementing IFRS 9 is a major undertaking as it affects accounting and reporting systems throughoutthe bank.
Read more about the implementation of IFRS 9 on p. 37 and in note 1.
Market conduct
2
Protecting investors – MiFID II and MiFIR
In 2018, EU's Markets in Financial InstrumentsDirective and Regulation (MiFID and MiFIR) took effect1) They aim at strengthening the protection ofinvestors by increasing trans parency around costs and charges, ensuring that customers' financial literacy match theirrisk profiles, and increasing the information provided to customers. The new rules apply to all types of customers and services such as orderreception and execution, investment advice and portfolio management. MiFID 2 and MiFIR are among the most comprehensive regulatory overhauls in the history offinancial services. Theyhave an effectthroughoutthe bank. They enable the bank to furtherimprove the customer offering by providing an opportunity to interact with customers to a greater extent and thereby better understand how to meettheir needs. The bank has also improved and clarified its business and pricing models as a result ofthe regulations.
Payment services – PSD 2
In 2018, EU's Payment Services Directive(PSD 2) entered into force 1) . Itis designed to promote competition in the financial services industry – while ensuring customer secu rity. An importantfeature is the requirementto provide access to accounts and paymentinitiation based on customers' demand. This enables third party developers to build applications and services around customer and account information in a financial institution – so called Open Banking. Overtime this will likely transform the role of banks and banking-related services. SEB plays an active role in this development.
Consumer protection 3
Guarding customer data – GDPR
EU's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) will apply from mid-2018 1). As it willreplace 28 nationalregulations (in Sweden:the Swedish Personal Data Act, PuL – personuppgiftslagen),the GDPR willreduce complexity and legal uncertainty as well as administrative costs. The new privacy rules apply to all businesses, but will have a greater effect on banking since the financial sectorinvolves large volumes of personal data. One key requirementin the new rules is the rightto be forgotten – meaning that when a customer wants
1) Regulations automatically apply as law in each EU country whereas Directives apply through theirimplementation into national law.
to be forgotten, his/her data should be deleted – as long as otherlegalrequirements allow it. Furthermore, customers should be provided easier access to his or herindividual data, and getinformation on how that data is processed. It will also be easierfor customers to move personal data from SEB to other parties. Data protection must be builtin to all products and services by default. Allrequirements are subjectto sanctions with fines up to four per cent of a company's global annualturnover.
Corporate governance

During the year, accelerating technical develop ments, and the need for further digitalisation of SEB's services, have been deeply analysed by the Board. Further topics have included information and cyber security. At the same time, the growing regulatory environment in the financial sector has posed challenges and needs for resource planning and IT priorities. Other important areas for the Board have been succession planning, among other things due to the appointment of SEB's new CEO."
Marcus Wallenberg Chairman of the Board
To maintain the important societal function as a bank, it is of paramount importance for SEB that all stake holders have great confidence and trust in the bank's operations. Professional people who are guided by strong and proper business conduct are crucial as is maintaining a sound risk culture.
The importance of corporate governance
To maintain trust among customers, employees, shareholders and other stakeholders and prevent conflicts ofinterest,roles and responsibilities are clearly defined for shareholders, direc tors, management and other stakeholders.
SEB's work with corporate governance is focused on ensuring smooth and effective operations with high standards, sound risk management and robustinternal control.
Rules and regulations
As a Swedish public limited liability financial institution with secu rities listed on Nasdaq Stockholm, SEB is subjectto numerous rules and regulations. The externalframework for SEB's corpo rate governance includes the following rules and regulations:
- the Companies Act
- the Annual Accounts Act
- the Nasdaq Stockholm Issuer Rules
- the Swedish Corporate Governance Code
- the Banking and Financing Business Act
- the rules and guidelines issued by the Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority and other authorities.
- See p. 50 forinformation about new regulatory requirements.
In addition, SEB applies an internalframework, which among otherthings includes the Articles of Association, adopted by the General Meeting of Shareholders. Policies and instructions that
define the division ofresponsibility within the group are tools for the Board and the President and Chief Executive Officer (the President) in their governing and controlling roles. Such policies and instructions include, among others:
- Rules of Procedure forthe Board and the Instructions forthe Board Committees
- Instructions forthe President and the Group's Activities
- Group CreditInstruction and Risk Policy
- Instruction for Handling of Conflicts ofInterest
- Instruction for Procedures Against Money Laundering and Financing of Terrorism
- Code of ConductSee sebgroup.com
- Remuneration Policy
- Information Security Policy
- Corporate Sustainability PolicySee sebgroup.com
- PoliciesonAssessmentofSuitabilityofDirectors,membersofthe GroupExecutiveCommittee(GEC)andotherkeyfunctionholders.
SEB's ethical and sustainability endeavours are an integral part of the business, and the Board continuously discusses these issues. SEB's Code of Conduct describes SEB's values, ethics and stand ards of business conduct and provides guidance on how to live by these values. Policies and guidelines for sustainability and various group-wide position statements and industry sector policies addressing environmental, social and governance issues are also of vital importance.
The Corporate Governance Report has been prepared in accordance with the Annual Accounts Act and the Swedish Cor porate Governance Code (the Code). SEB strives to follow the Code where appropriate and has no deviations to reportfor 2017.
More information about corporate governance is available on sebgroup.com
Shareholders and general meetings of shareholders
The shareholders' influence is exercised at general meetings of shareholders through, among otherthings, election of members ofthe Board and the bank's auditor.
SEB has approximately 269,000 shareholders. Around 172,000 ofthem own less than 500 shares, while 112 hold more than 1,000,000 shares, accounting for 82 per cent ofthe capital and votes. SEB's share capital consists oftwo classes of shares – A shares and C shares. Each Class A share carries one vote and each Class C share carries one-tenth of a vote.SEB's largest shareholders and the shareholder structure are shown on p. 29-30.
The Annual General Meeting (AGM) of shareholders is held in Stockholm, in Swedish. All shareholders listed in the shareholder register who have duly notified their attendance have the right to participate atthe AGM and to vote forthe full number oftheir shares. Shareholders who cannot attend may appoint a repre sentative. The 2017 AGM was held on 28 March. A total of 1,364 persons,representing 1,931 shareholders, were in attendance at the AGM. An electronic system fortelevoters was used atthe AGM.
The main resolutions made atthe AGM were:
- approval ofthe dividend of SEK 5.50 per share
- decrease ofthe number of directors to eleven
- re-election often directors and election of one new director
- re-election of Marcus Wallenberg as Chairman ofthe Board
- re-election of PricewaterhouseCoopers as auditor
- adoption of guidelines forremuneration ofthe President and the other members ofthe GEC
- approval oftwo long-term equity programmes
- issuance of a mandate to the Board concerning the acquisition and sale of own shares for SEB's securities business,forthe long-term equity programmes and for capital management purposes
- issuance of a mandate to the Board to resolve on the issuance of convertibles.
- The minutes from the AGM are available on sebgroup.com
Nomination Committee
The tasks of the Nomination Committee include submitting proposals to the AGM regarding the Chair man and directors of the Board as well as the auditor.
The Nomination Committee nominates the Chairman,the direc tors ofthe Board and the auditor as well as makes recommendations regarding directors'fees and fees for committee work. The Nomination Committee also reviews the evaluations ofthe Board and the Chairman ofthe Board.
Pursuantto a decision by the AGM,the Nomination Committee is to be composed ofthe Chairman ofthe Board along with repre sentatives ofthe bank's fourlargest shareholders that are inter ested in appointing a member. One ofthe independent directors shall be appointed as an additional member ofthe Nomination Committee.
The composition ofthe Nomination Committee meets the requirements laid outin the Code. The Nomination Committee has access to relevantinformation aboutthe bank's operations and financial and strategic position provided by the Chairman of the Board and the additional member.
An important principle is thatthe size and composition ofthe Board shall be such as to serve the bank in the best possible way. Therefore, as the starting pointforits work,the Nomination Com mittee is tasked with assessing the degree to which the Board meets the demands that will be placed on the Board as a result of
Nomination committee forthe 2018AGM
appoint a member ofthe Nomination Committee.
| Votes (%) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Member | Representing | 31Aug. 2017 |
| Petra Hedengran, ordförande | Investor | 20.8 |
| Magnus Billing | Alecta | 7.0 |
| Lars Heikensten | Trygg-Stiftelsen | 5.3 |
| Javiera Ragnartz | AMF Försäkring och Fonder | 3.4 |
| Marcus Wallenberg | SEB, Chairman ofthe Board | |
| 36.5 |
Tomas Nicolin, additional member, appointed by the Board. Swedbank Robur Fonder, which is the bank's fourth largest shareholder, has declined to

Board of Directors
| Marcus Wallenberg |
Sven Nyman |
Jesper Ovesen |
Johan H. Andresen |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Position | Chairman since 2005 | Vice Chairman since 2017 | Vice Chairman since 2014 | Director |
| Committee | l RCC l ACC l RemCo | l RCC l ACC | ||
| Year elected | 2002 | 2013 | 2004 | 2011 |
| Born | 1956 | 1959 | 1957 | 1961 |
| Education | B.Sc. (Foreign Service) | B.Sc. (Business and Econ.) | B.Sc. (Econ.) and MBA | B.A. (Government and Policy Studies) and MBA |
| Other assignments | Chairman of Saab and FAM. Vice Chairman ofInvestor. Director of AstraZeneca Plc., Temasek Holdings Ltd and the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation. |
Chairman of RAM Rational Asset Management. Director of RAM ONE, Ferd AS (Norway), Nobel Foundation's Investment Committee, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm School of Economics Association and of Axel and Margaret Ax:son Johnson's Foundation. |
Director of Sunrise Communi cation Group AG (Switzerland), Lundbeck A/S (Denmark) and ConvaTec Group Plc. (UK). |
Owner and Chairman of Ferd AS (Norway). Chairman of Council on Ethics forthe Government Pension Fund Global (Norway). Director of SWIX Sport AS (Norway), NMI-Nordic Microfi- nance Initiative and Junior Achievement Europe. |
| Background | Citibank in New York (USA), Deutsche Bank (Germany), S G Warburg Co (UK), Citicorp (Hong Kong), SEB (Germany) and Stora Feldmühle (Germany). Executive Vice President ofInvestor and CEO of Investor. Several assignments as Chairman and Director of large public companies. |
Broad experience from the finan cial business field. Managerial positions within Investor. CEO and founder of Lancelot Asset Management and Arbitech. Several directorships. |
Price Waterhouse. Vice Presi- dent and later CEO of Baltica Bank A/S. Vice President and Head of Finance of Novo Nord isk A/S. CEO of Kirkbi Group. CFO of Den Danske Bank A/S, LEGO Holding A/S and TDC A/S. Several directorships. |
International Paper Co. Partner of Ferd AS. CEO of Ferd AS. |
| Nationality | Swedish | Swedish | Danish | Norwegian |
| Own and closely related persons' shareholdings |
753,584 Class A shares and 720 Class C shares |
10,440 Class A shares and 10,200 Class C shares |
25,000 Class A shares | 100,000 Class A shares |
| Independentin relation to bank/major share- holders |
Yes/No | Yes/Yes | Yes/Yes | Yes/Yes |
| Attendance at Board/ 1) Committee meetings |
25 of 25 / 29 of 30 | 23 of 25 | 24 of 25 / 21 of 21 | 23 of 25 |
| Remuneration, Board meetings, SEK |
2,850,000 | 900,000 | 900,000 | 675,000 |
| Remuneration, Committeemeetings ,SEK |
790,000 | – | 950,000 | – |
lChairman
lDeputy Chairman
l Member
1) Only meetings that are possible forthe directorto attend, without any conflicts ofinterest, are reflected.
Urban Jansson, Birgitta Kantola and Annika Falkengren left the Board in connection with the AGM 2017.
Johan Torgeby was elected new member of the Board.
the bank's operations, organisation and future direction. The Board's size and composition is discussed and reviewed in terms of whetherthey have adequate knowledge, skills and experience, both in the financial and other sectors. The directors should also have sufficienttime to perform their duties and understand the business and the main risks ofthe bank.
The composition ofthe Board shall adhere to applicable laws and regulations and to the Policy onDiversity andAssessment of Suitability ofDirectors, adopted by the Board. The Nomination Committee shall ensure diversity within the Board in terms of educational and professional background, gender, age and geographical provenance ofthe directors.
Furthermore,the Nomination Committee discusses succession matters with particular emphasis on continuity and long-termper spective in ensuring the Board's competence and composition.
The Nomination Committee forthe 2018 AGM was appointed in the autumn of 2017. No specialfee has been paid to the members ofthe Nomination Committee.TheNomination Committee's proposals for decisions, including motivated account as regards directors is available on sebgroup.com
Board of Directors
The Board has overallresponsibility forthe organisation, management and operations ofthe group.
The Board has adopted Rules of Procedure thatregulate the Board's role and ways of working as well as special instructions forthe Board's committees.


Signhild Arnegård Hansen Samir Brikho Winnie Fok Tomas Nicolin
Chairman of SnackCo of America Corp. Vice Chairman ofthe Swedish-Ameri can Chamber of Commerce (SACC) (USA). Director of Magnora, SACC New York, Business Sweden, ESBRI and King Carl XVI Gustaf's Foundation for
Young Leadership.
| Director | Director | Director | Director |
|---|---|---|---|
| l RemCo | l RCC | l ACC | l RCC |
| 2010 | 2013 | 2013 | 2009 |
| 1960 | 1958 | 1956 | 1954 |
| B.Sc. (Human Resources) and journalism studies |
M.Sc. (Engineering, Thermal Technology) |
UK Business Ambassador.
Co-Chairman ofthe UK-UAE Business Council and the UK-ROK CEO Forum. Member of Advisory Boards of Stena. Chairman ofthe Step Change Charity.
| Bachelor of Commerce | B.Sc. (Econ.) and M.Sc. |
|---|---|
Director of Volvo Car Corporation, G4S plc (UK). Member ofthe Investment Committee of HOPU Investments Co, Ltd. (Asia), senior advisor to FAM and WFAB.

| (Management) | |
|---|---|
| Chairman of Centre for Justice. Director of Nordstjernan, Nobel Foundation and Axel and Margaret Ax:son Johnson's Foundation. Member ofthe Investment |
Committee of Niam Property Fund.
Broad experience in the financial sector as CEO of Alecta, Third National Swedish Pension Fund and E. Öhman J:or Fondkommission as well as a leading position in Handels banken. Several directorships.
President ofthe family-owned company Svenska LantChips. Chair man ofthe Confederation of Swedish Enterprise. Vice Chairman of Business Europe. Director ofInnventia, IFL at Stockholm School of Economics, Research Institute ofIndustrial Economics, Loomis Sverige and University of Lund.
Broad international experience from management and leadership, espe cially within the industrial sector. Leading positions within ABB, e.g. as Division Head and CEO of significant subsidiaries. Member ofthe GEC of ABB Ltd, (Switzerland). CEO of Amec Foster Wheeler plc, (UK).
Broad experience from the financial business field. Certified Public Accountantin Australia and in Hong Kong. Member ofthe Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales. Industrial advisor and senior advisorto Investor and Husqvarna. CEO and Senior Partner of EQT Partners Asia Ltd and CEO of New Asia
| Partners Ltd. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Swedish | Swedish, Swiss | British | Swedish |
| 5,387 Class A shares | 0 shares | 3,000 Class A shares | 66,000 Class A shares |
| Yes/Yes | Yes/Yes | Yes/Yes | Yes/Yes |
| 24 of 25 / 8 of 8 | 24 of 25 / 6 of 9 | 21 of 25 / 7 of 8 | 25 of 25 / 13 of 14 |
| 675,000 | 675,000 | 675,000 | 675,000 |
| 387,500 | 345,000 | 250,000 | 345,000 |
The Board has the following duties, among others:
- deciding on the objective, strategy and framework forthe business activities as well as the business plan
- regularly following up and evaluating the operations in relation to the objectives and guidelines established by the Board
- ensuring thatthe business is organised in such a way thatthe accounting,treasury management and the risks inherentin the business as well as financial conditions in all otherrespects are controlled in a satisfactory mannerin accordance with external and internalrules
- deciding on major acquisitions and divestments as well as other majorinvestments
- appointing or dismissing ofthe President,the members ofthe GEC,the ChiefRiskOfficer (CRO), and theHead ofGroup Internal Audit, aswell as setting the remuneration ofthese individuals.
The Chairman ofthe Board organises and directs the work ofthe Board and ensures among otherthings thatthe directors on a regular basis receive information and education on changes in rules concerning the activities of SEB and on responsibilities of directors of a listed financial company. Educational and specialisation seminars are held each year, and new directors are offered seminars with information on and discussions aboutthe group's various operations, including information aboutthe controlfunctions.
The directors are elected by the shareholders atthe AGM for a one-yearterm. Since the 2017 AGM the Board has consisted of eleven AGM-elected directors, without deputies, and oftwo directors and two deputies who serve as employee representatives and are appointed by the trade unions. In orderfor a quorum to exist at a Board meeting, more than half ofthe directors must
Board of Directors (continued)

Portfolio Manager & Macro Economist (Swedbank), Executive Director, Financial Sponsors Group Private Equity at Morgan Stanley in London, Head of Client Coverage, Merchant Banking. Co-head of Vice President Product Development, Niche cars, at Volvo Cars, Senior Vice President Research and Development at Bonnier, Founder ofthe consultancy network MindMill Network and CEO at Differ Strategy Consulting.
| division Large Corporates & Financial Institutions. |
Differ Strategy Consulting. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Nationality Swedish | Swedish | Swedish | |
| Own and closely related persons' shareholdings |
12,500 Class A shares | 5,567 Class A shares, 73,729 share rights and 81,247 conditional share rights |
1,150 Class A shares |
| Independentin relation to bank/major share- holders |
Yes/No | No/Yes | No/No |
| Attendance at Board/ Committee meetings |
1) 24 of 25 / 8 of 8 | 14 of 14 | 24 of 25 / 5 of 5 |
| Remuneration, Board meetings, SEK |
675,000 | – | 675,000 |
| Remuneration, | 250,000 | – | 75,683 |
Committeemeetings,SEK
lChairman
lDeputy Chairman l Member
1) Only meetings that are possible forthe directorto attend, without any conflicts ofinterest, are reflected.
2) As of 16 August 2017, Sara Öhrvall participated in SEB's operational digitalisation work and,forthatreason, she resigned from the work in RemCo. The remuneration forthe assigment amounted to SEK 1,050,230.
be present. The Presidentis the only AGM-elected director employed by the bank. The Nomination Committee has assessed the directors' independence in relation to the bank and the bank's management as well as in relation to shareholders controlling 10 per cent or more ofthe shares or votes and has found thatthe composition ofthe Board meets the requirements ofthe Code.
Background Financial analyst at Goldman Sachs and
ment Manager atInvestor.
Investor, CFO at Syncron International and Hallvarsson and Halvarsson. Invest-
The work ofthe Board follows a yearly plan. In 2017,the Board held 25 meetings. The President attends all board meetings exceptthose dealing with matters in which the President has an interestthat may be in conflict with the interests ofthe bank, such as when the President's work is evaluated. Other members of management participate wheneverrequired.
Directors' fees
SEB's AGM in 2017 settotalfees of SEK 12,887,500 forthe members ofthe Board and decided how these fees should be distributed among the Board and its committees. Directors' fees are paid on a running basis during the mandate period.
Following a recommendation by the Nomination Committee,the Board has adopted a policy thatrecommends that directors use 25 per cent oftheirfee to purchase and hold SEB shares up to an amount corresponding to one year's fee.
Board committees
The Board's overallresponsibility cannot be delegated. However, the Board has established committees to handle certain defined issues and to prepare such issues for decision by the Board. At present,there are three committees:the Risk and Capital Committee (RCC),the Audit and Compliance Committee (ACC), and the Remuneration and Human Resources Committee (RemCo). These committees reportto the Board on a regular basis. An important principle is that as many directors as possible shall participate in committee work. The Chairman ofthe Board serves as deputy chair ofthe three committees. Neitherthe President nor any other officer ofthe bank is a member ofthe committees.
Appointed by the employees



Director, appointed by the employees. Director, appointed by the employees. Deputy Director, appointed by the employees. Deputy Director, appointed by the employees. 2016 20153) 20164) 2015 1962 1968 1967 1959 University studies in mathematics, statistics and law. Engineering logistics. University studies in working environment. LLB Chairman of Financial Sector Union of SEB group and Financial Sector Union Western section in SEB, Direc tor EB-SB Fastigheter and EB-SB Holding. Chairman ofthe Association of University Graduates at SEB. First deputy Chairman of Financial Sector Union of SEB and Financial sector union regional club Group Operations of SEB. Vice Chairman ofthe Association of University Graduates at SEB. Direc tor ofthe Foundation of Alma Detthows. Office manager and various other positions in SEB. Various specialist and leaderroles within Trygg-Hansa. Director of SEB's Profit Sharing Foundation. Sales manager at Trygg-Hansa in the property insurance business. SEB in various positions in systems management and IT development, currently Systems Management Advisor. Employed at Fixed Income, group operations. Director of SEB's Profit Sharing Foundation and Result Premium Foundation. Various client executive positions in several divisions and subsidiaries in the SEB. Presently client executive at Private Banking, Foundations. Swedish Swedish Swedish Swedish 0 shares and 805 conditional share rights 3,748 Class A shares and 805 conditional share rights 179 Class A shares and 1,610 conditional share rights 5,001 Class A shares and 805 conditional share rights –––– 24 of 25 25 of 25 21 of 25 22 of 25 –––– ––––
Anna-Karin Glimström Håkan Westerberg Annika Isenborg Charlotta Lindholm
3) Deputy director 2011–2014 4) Deputy director 2014
Evaluation ofthe Board of Directors,the President and the Group Executive Committee
The Board uses an annual self-assessment method, which among otherthings includes a questionnaire,followed by discussions within the Board. Through this process the activities and work methods ofthe Board,the Chairman ofthe Board and the respective committees are evaluated. Among the issues examined are:
- the extentto which the individual directors take an active partin Board and committee discussions
- whether directors contribute independent opinions
- whetherthe meeting atmosphere facilitates open discussions.
The outcome ofthe evaluation is presented to and discussed by the Board and the Nomination Committee. The evaluation process and its outcome contribute to furtherimprovement of the Board's work and help the Nomination Committee to deter mine the appropriate size and composition ofthe Board.
The Chairman ofthe Board formally evaluates each individual director's work once a year. Marcus Wallenberg does not participate in the evaluation ofthe Chairman's work, which in 2017 was directed by Tomas Nicolin. The Board evaluates the work ofthe President and theGEC on a continuous basis, without participation by the President or any other member oftheGEC.

Forthe RemCo, appointing the new CEO, succession and competence planning as well as regulatory change were the key areas of attention in 2017. Appointment ofthe new CEO and other succession matters were prepared based on the committee's continuous focused work to secure an appropriate succession order, an important part of which is to monitorthe bank's total competence pool. The committee also monitored SEB as an employer. Having a reputation as an inclusive and attractive employeris increasingly importantto secure a diverse workforce leading the bank into the future. In 2017,the committee also addressed a new set ofregulatory require ments that affectthe bank's remuneration of employees."
Signhild Arnegård Hansen,
Chairman of RemCo
Remuneration and Human Resources Committee
The RemCo prepares,for decision by the Board, appointments ofthe President and the members ofthe GEC. The Committee develops, monitors and evaluates SEB's remuneration system and remuneration practice, incentive programmes and risk adjustment of deferred variable pay. Further, RemCo monitors and evaluates how the guidelines established by the AGM for remuneration ofthe President and the members ofthe GEC are applied. An independent auditor's review report on the adher ence of SEB's remuneration system to the Remuneration Policy is presented to the Committee annually.
The RemCo reviews, in consultation with the RCC, SEB's Remuneration Policy and ensures thatthe bank's remuneration structure takes into accountthe risks and the cost of capital and liquidity. The analysis is among otherthings based on the risk analysis performed jointly by Group Risk, Group Compliance and Group HR.
In addition,the Committee oversees the group's pension obligations and,together with the RCC,the measures taken to secure the overall pension obligations ofthe group, including developments in the bank's pension foundations. The RemCo held eight meetings in 2017.
The President,together with theHead ofGroupHR,makes p resentations to the Committee onmatters in which there are no conflicts ofinterest.See the Remuneration Report on p. 64.
RemCo members
Signhild Arnegård Hansen (Chairman), Marcus Wallenberg (Deputy Chairman) and Sara Öhrvall (until 15 August 2017.)
The RemCo's work in 2017:
- proposed appointment of new CEO
- reviewed the Remuneration Policy including the definition of employees in positions with a material impact on SEB's risk profile
- proposed remuneration guidelines forthe President and members ofthe GEC
- developed long-term equity-based programmes
- proposed remuneration ofthe President and members ofthe GEC in accordance with the guidelines adopted by the AGM
- proposed remuneration ofthe Head of Group Internal Audit, the CRO and the Head of Group Compliance in accordance with the Remuneration Policy
- followed up remuneration principles, variable remuneration programmes and pension obligations
- followed up the annual group talentreview and supported a framework on diversity and inclusion
- reviewed and discussed adaptations and implementation ofregulations affecting the bank's remuneration structure.
On the Board's agenda in 2017
| Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| • AGM notification and AGM proposals |
• Review ofthe Large Corporates & Financial Institutions Division |
• Follow-up of compliance with new regulations focusing on |
Authority | • Meeting with the Director General ofthe Swedish Financial Supervisory |
||
| • Appointment of new CEO | • Macroeconomic review | inter alia MiFID II and GDPR • Review of digitalisation and transformation work within the |
• Review ofIT projects | |||
| • Macroeconomic review | • Internal capital and liquidity | |||||
| • Balance sheet, capital and dividend policy |
assessment • Remuneration Policy |
Large Corporates & Financial Institutions Division |
• Review ofthe Corporate & Private Customers division |
|||
| • Annual Report 2016 | • Deep analysis ofIT and digitalisation work |
• Deep analysis ofIT and digitalisation work • Review of savings and |
• Review of operations and reorganisation in Germany |
|||
| • Internal and external auditreports as well as Group Compliance |
• IT competence • Follow-up of compliance with new regulations • Review ofthe Baltic division. |
• Recovery and Resolution plan | ||||
| report • Financial governance model |
investment offerings | • Deep analysis ofIT and digitalisation work • Business plan,financial plans and forecasts • Risk strategy |
||||
| and financialtargets | • Review of competence matters | |||||
| • Remuneration ofthe CEO,the | • Risk seminar | |||||
| GEC and controlfunctions | ||||||
| • Statutory meeting | • Annualreview of policies and | |||||
| • Group talentreview and | instructions | |||||
| succession planning | • SEB's Code of Conduct | |||||
| • Board evaluation | ||||||
| • Diversity and inclusion |
In addition to the above, SEB's quarterly report, a reportfrom the Board committees and a summary of SEB's risk position, asset quality, credit portfolio and liquidity position are on the Board's agenda each quarter.

Jesper Ovesen, Chairman of both the RCC and the ACC
Forthe RCC,regulatory development of capitalrequirements has continued to be a focus area in 2017. Otherimportant areas addressed include monitoring ofthe credit portfolio,the Swedish household mortgage market and specific market segments such as the oil, gas and offshore industry. The RCC has also overthe yearfollowed up on a number of currently running projects to implement new regulatory requirements that will come into effectin 2018, including IFRS 9 which has had a significantimpact on the financialreporting work during the year. The effect on capital adequacy will however be limited."
Within the work of ACC, we note that since the lastfinancial crisis, we have seen a large number of new regulations impacting banks and financial institutions. The need for internal control ofregulatory compliance has increased and an in-depth understanding of potentialrisks in financialreporting, as a result of new IFRS requirements, has required extra attention from ACC. Other key issues for ACC during the year have been IT security, including access and authority controls, and preparatory work on procurement of new external auditorto meetthe requirement of auditorrotation according to the EU Auditing Regulation."
Risk and Capital Committee
The RCC supports the Board in ensuring that SEB is organised and managed in such a way that allrisks inherentin the group's busi ness are controlled in accordance with the Board's risk tolerance as well as with external and internalrules. The RCC also monitors the group's capital situation on a continuous basis.
The RCC sets the principles and parameters for measuring and allocating risk and capital within the group and oversees risk management systems and the risk tolerance and strategy forthe short and long term. The RCC prepares a recommenda tion forthe appointment and dismissal of the CRO. It also decides on individual credit matters of majorimportance or of impor tance as to principles and assists the RemCo in providing a riskand capital-based view on the remuneration system. The RCC held 14 meetings in 2017.
The group's Chief Financial Officer (CFO) has the overall responsibility forinforming and submitting proposals to the RCC on matters related to capital and funding. The CRO has the same overallresponsibility regarding risk and credit matters. The Presi dent,the CFO and the CRO regularly participate in the meetings. The CRO function is described on p. 62. Information on risk,
liquidity and capital management is provided on p. 44.
RCC members
Jesper Ovesen (Chairman), Marcus Wallenberg (Deputy Chairman), Tomas Nicolin and Samir Brikho.
The RCC's work in 2017:
- monitored the implementation ofinternalrules including the credit policy and instruction
- monitored risk development
- monitored the macroeconomic development
- prepared matters concerning market and liquidity risk limits
- reviewed significant changes in the credit portfolio and ofthe credit process
- reviewed models and methods forrisk measurement
- discussed adaptation to new capitalrequirements
- reviewed the overall capital and liquidity strategy and position including internal capital and liquidity assessment
- prepared matters concerning the group's capital goals and capital management, such as the dividend
- reviewed reports from internal audit and compliance
- held strategic discussions on holistic financial and balance sheet management.
Audit and Compliance Committee
The ACC supports the Board in its work with quality assurance of the bank's financialreporting,the internal control overthe finan cialreporting and the reporting to supervisors. When required, the ACC also prepares,for decision by the Board, a recommendation forthe appointment or dismissal ofthe Head of Group Inter nal Audit. The Committee maintains regular contact with the bank's external and internal auditors and discusses the co-ordi nation oftheir activities. The Committee also ensures that any remarks and observations from the auditors are addressed, and evaluates the external auditor' s work and independence.
When required, a proposalfrom the President's on appoint ment or dismissal ofthe Head of Group Compliance is subjectto the Committee's approval.
The ACC held eight meetings in 2017. The CFO,the external auditors,the Head of Group Internal Audit and the Head of Group Compliance submit matters and reports forthe Committee's con sideration. The President,the CFO and the CRO regularly partici pate in the meetings.See p. 66 for The Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
ACC members
Jesper Ovesen (Chairman), Marcus Wallenberg (Deputy Chairman), Winnie Fok and Helena Saxon.
The ACC's work in 2017:
- reviewed the annual accounts and interim reports as well as auditreports
- prepared for procurement of new external auditor
- monitored the group's internal audit
- monitored compliance issues
- monitored internal control overfinancialreporting
- monitored internal control over supervisory reporting
- monitored services, otherthan auditing services, procured from the external auditor
- drafted a recommendation to the Nomination Committee for election ofthe external auditor by the AGM
- adopted an annual audit plan forthe Internal Auditfunction, co-ordinated with the external audit plan
- approved the annual Group Compliance plan
- held discussions with representatives ofthe external auditor on several occasions, withoutthe President or any other member ofthe bank's management being present.
Group Executive Committee
| Position | GEC member since |
SEB employee since |
Nationality Own and closely related persons' shareholdings1) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johan Torgeby | President and CEO since 2017 | 2014 | 2009 | Swedish | 5,567 Class A shares, 73,729 sr and 81,247 csr. |
||
| Magnus Carlsson | Deputy President & CEO since 2014 |
2005 | Swedish | 54,998 Class A shares , 68,297 sr and 158,801 csr. |
|||
| Magnus Agustsson | Chief Risk Officer since 2017 |
2017 | 2009 | and Finnish | 8,744 Class A shares, 1,448 sr and 30,890 csr. |
||
| Jeanette Almberg | Head of Group Human Resources since 2016 |
2016 | Swedish | 10,343 Class A shares, 22,683 sr and 38,537 csr. |
|||
| Joachim Alpen | Executive Vice President. Head of the Large Corporates & Financial Institutions division since 2017 |
2014 | 2001 | 1967 | MBA, M.A. (International relations) |
Swedish | 6,112 Class A shares, 113,999 sr and 78,347 csr. |
| Jan Erik Back | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer since 2008 |
2008 | 2008 | Swedish | 60,968 Class A shares, 124,711 sr and 168,985 csr. |
||
| Viveka Hirdman-Ryrberg |
Head ofGroup Communications andGroupMarketing since2009. Chairman ofthe Corporate Sustainability Committee. |
2009 | Sc. (Econ.) | Swedish | 62,761 Class A shares, 43,633 sr and 56,231 csr. |
||
| Martin Johansson | Head of Business Support since 2011 |
2009 | 2005 | Swedish | 236 Class A shares, 46,255 sr and 139,219 csr. |
||
| Christoffer Malmer | Executive Vice President, Co-head ofthe Corporate & Private Customers division since 2016 |
2014 | 2011 | 1975 | B.A. (Interna- tional busi ness) |
Swedish | 59,321 Class A shares and 74,437 csr. |
| David Teare | Head ofthe Life & Investment Management division since 2017 |
2011 | Canadian | 54,675 Class A shares, 60,652 sr and 75,811 csr. |
|||
| Mats Torstendahl | ExecutiveVice President, Co-head ofthe Corporate & Private Customers division since 2016 |
2009 | 2009 | 1961 | M.Sc. (Engi- neering Physics) |
Swedish | 104,218 Class A shares, 56,913 sr and 168,046 csr. |
| Riho Unt | Head ofthe Baltic division since 2016 |
2016 | 2001 | 1978 | MBA,MA (PublicAdmi nistration) |
Estonian | 43,485 Class A shares, 7,336 sr and 32, 617 csr. |
| members | |||||||
| Johan Andersson | Country Manager SEB Germany since 2016 |
2009 | 1980 | Swedish | 50,800 Class A shares, 22 Class C shares and 747 csr. |
||
| Peter Høltermand | Country Manager SEB Denmark since 2002 |
2011 | Danish | 179 Class A shares, 17,493 sr, 32,415 csr and 53,524 cps. |
|||
| Rasmus Järborg | Chief Strategy Officer since 2015 | 2015 | 2008 | Swedish | 5,598 Class A shares, 28,386 sr and 60,153 csr. |
||
| Marcus Nystén | Country Manager SEB Finland since 2010 |
2014 | Finnish | 119,847 Class A shares, 22,924 csr and 37,583 cps. |
|||
| William Paus | Country Manager SEB Norway since 2010 |
2011 | 1992 | Norwegian 52,900 Class A shares, 30,456 csr and 32,029 cps. |
|||
| Additional | Born Education 1974 B.Sc. (Econ.) 1993 1956 B.Sc. (Econ.) 2008 1965 B.Sc. (Econ.) 1961 B.Sc. (Econ.) 1990 1963 B.Sc. and Lic. 1962 B.Sc. (Econ.) 2006 1963 B. Comm. 1957 B.Sc. (Econ.) 1997 1963 B.Sc. (Econ.) 1976 M.Sc. (Econ.) 1998 1960 M.Sc. (Econ.) 1967 M.Sc. (Econ.) |
1973 C.Sc and M.Sc Icelandic |
1) Abbrevations in the table: sr = share rights, csr = conditional share rights, cps = conditional phantom shares
The President
The Board has adopted an instruction forthe President's duties and role. The President, who is also the Chief Executive Officer, is responsible for administrating the bank's business and risk in accordance with the strategy, guidelines, policies and instruc tions established by the Board. The Presidentreports to the Board and submits at each board meeting a report on, among otherthings,the performance ofthe business in relation to decisions made by the Board.
The President appoints the Heads of Divisions,the Head of Business Support and Heads ofthe various staff and support functions thatreport directly to the President.
The President's committees
The President has three main committees at his disposalforthe purpose of managing the operations:
The Group Executive Committee (GEC)
To safeguard the interests ofthe group as a whole,the President consults with the GEC on matters of majorimportance or of importance as to principles. The GEC deals with, among other things, matters of common concern to several divisions, strategic issues, sustainability, business plans as well as financialforecasts and reports. The GEC held 31 meetings in 2017.

The Asset and Liability Committee (ALCO)
The ALCO, chaired by the President and with the CFO as deputy chair, is a group-wide decision-making, monitoring and consultative body. The ALCO, which held eleven meetings in 2017, handles the following matters, among others:
- financial stability, particularly in the new regulatory framework
- strategic capital and liquidity issues, including internal capital
- allocation and principles forinternal pricing • structural issues and issues related to the bank's balance sheet and business volumes
- financing of wholly-owned subsidiaries
- the balance sheet and funding strategy forthe SEB group.
The Group Risk Committee (GRC)
The GRC, chaired by the President and with the CRO as deputy chair, is a group-wide, decision-making committee that addresses alltypes ofrisk at group level in orderto evaluate portfolios, products and customers from a comprehensive risk perspective. The GRC held 61 meetings in 2017.
- The GRC is tasked with:
- making important credit decisions
- ensuring that allrisks inherentin the group's activities are identified, defined, measured, monitored and controlled in accordance with internal and externalrules
- supporting the Presidentin ensuring that decisions regarding the group's long-term risk tolerance are followed in the business organisation
- ensuring thatthe Board's guidelines forriskmanagement and risk control are implemented and thatthe necessary rules and policies forrisk-taking in the group aremaintained and enforced.
Divisions and business areas
The Board regulates the activities ofthe group through an instruction concerning the group's operations and has laid down rules establishing how the group's divisions, including the international activities conducted through branches and subsi diaries, are to be governed and organised.
SEB's business is organised in four divisions. Each division is responsible forthe subsidiaries designated to the division. The Head or Co-heads of Division have overallresponsibility forthe activities in the business areas and appoint, after consultation with the President, heads ofthe business areas within the division.
A Country Manageris appointed in a country outside Sweden where SEB operates. The Country Manager co-ordinates the group's business locally and reports to a specially designated member ofthe GEC.
Sustainability aspects
An operational steering committee has been assigned by the Presidentto take responsibility for and monitorthe bank's sustainability work. The committee is chaired by the Head of Group Communications, who is a member ofthe Group Executive Committee. Seniorrepresentatives from the divisions and group functions are also members. The committee is supported by the Group Sustainability function, which drives and co-ordinates the overall sustainability agenda. Responsi bility forthe daily sustainability work lies with the heads of business areas and group functions as well as local sustainability committees. Special committees may be formed to deal with specific sustainability matters when needed.
Business support and staff functions
Business Supportis a cross-divisionalfunction established to leverage economies of scale in processes, IT and Information Security. Business Support covers such areas as transaction processing, development, maintenance and operation ofIT systems, and management of SEB's IT portfolio.
SEB's stafffunctions have globalresponsibility and support the organisation.
The CRO function
The CRO function is independentfrom the business and is responsible foridentifying, measuring, analysing and controlling SEB's risks.
The Chief Risk Officer (CRO) is appointed by the Board and reports to the President. The CRO keeps the Board,the RCC,the ACC,the GEC,the ALCO and the GRC regularly informed aboutrisk matters. The CRO has globalfunctionalresponsibility, and the activities ofthe CRO are governed by and set outin an instruction adopted by the Board. The CRO function is organised in two units: Group Risk and Group Credits.
Group Risk handles the group's risks. It aggregates and analy ses risk data across risk types and the group's credit portfolios, handles models forrisk-weighting as well as general matters surrounding risk governance and risk disclosure.
Group Credits is responsible for managing the credit approval process,for certain individual credit decisions and for monitoring compliance with policies set by the RCC and the Board. Its activities are regulated by the group's CreditInstruction, adopted by the Board. The chairs ofthe respective divisional credit commit-
On the GEC agenda in 2017
- macroeconomic updates
- discussion on new regulations, such as MiFID II, IFRS 9, GDPR, AML4 and PSD II
- annual accounts and quarterly reports
- AGM preparations
- review ofthe bank's various businesses and home markets
- follow up of current Business Plan 2016-2018 and discussion on new Business Plan
- discussion on capitalrequirements, asset quality and risk
- review of, and discussion on,the digitalisation work including development and launch of enhanced customer functionality as well as internal automation initiatives
- review and discussion on IT, including investments and security
- discussion on strategic investments and co-operation with fintech and digitalisation companies
- discussion on customer satisfaction, branding and image position as well as customerinsight work
- review of SEB's Code of Conduct
- employee Insight survey 2017 discussion of survey result and actions
- development of corporate sustainability
- review of outsourced activities
- discussion on Open Banking
- review process for handling of customer complaints
- annualreview of policies and instructions
- discussion on inclusion, diversity and #metoo
- review of competence and leadership development
- workshop on risks
tees have the rightto veto credit decisions. Material exceptions to the group's Credit Policy must be escalated to a higherlevel in the decision-making hierarchy.
The Head of Group Risk and the Group Credit Officer are appointed by the President, upon recommendation by the CRO, and reportto the CRO.Forinformation aboutrisk, liquidity and capital management see p. 44.
Group Compliance
The Compliance function in the SEB group (Group Compliance) is independentfrom the business organisation. The tasks of Compli ance are to inform, control and follow up on compliance matters. The Group Compliance function also advises the business and management,thereby securing that SEB's business is carried out in compliance with regulatory requirements, and promote trust from customers, shareholders and the financial markets.
- Special areas ofresponsibility are:
- customer protection
- conduct on the financial market
- prevention of money laundering and financing ofterrorism
- regulatory systems and controls.
The Head of Group Compliance, who is appointed by the Presi dent after approval by the ACC,reports regularly on compliance matters to the President,the GEC and the ACC, and annually to the RCC and the Board. Based on an analysis ofthe group's risks in this area,the President adopts, after approval by the ACC, an annual compliance plan. The Instruction for Compliance is adopted by the Board.
One compliance matterin 2017 was that SEB was subjectto a disciplinary action from Nasdaq related to the resignation of Annika Falkengren as CEO; breaching insiderinformation rules by not preparing an insiderregister atthe propertime during a weekend (when the stock exchange was closed).
Group Internal Audit
Group Internal Auditis a group-wide controlfunction commis sioned by the Board to independently evaluate the group's activities. The Head of Group Internal Auditis appointed by the Board.
The main task of Group Internal Auditis to evaluate and give assurance to the Board and the Presidentthat governance,risk management and internal controls are adequate and effective. The work is done with a risk-based approach in accordance with the methodology developed by the Institute ofInternal Auditors.
Each yearthe ACC adopts a plan forthe work ofInternal Audit. The Head ofInternal Auditreports the findings of completed audits, actions taken and the status of previously reported find ings to the ACC and also provides reports to the RCC and the Board.

Auditor Peter Nyllinge PricewaterhouseCoopers
Peter Nyllinge
Born 1966; Auditor of SEB, Partnerin charge as of 2012. Authorised Public Accountant, President of PwC Sweden. Other major assignments: Electrolux and Fagerhult. Previous major assignments: Ericsson, Securitas and Assa Abloy.
Information about the auditor
According to SEB's Articles of Association,the bank shall have atleast one and not more than two auditors with at most an equal number of deputies. A registered accounting firm may be appointed auditor.
PricewaterhouseCoopers AB has been the bank's auditor since 2000 and was re-elected in 2017 forthe period up to and including the 2018 AGM.
The fees charged by the auditorforthe auditing of 2016 and 2017 financial years and for other assignments invoiced during these periods are shown in the table below.
| Fees to the auditor | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2016 | |
| Audit assignment | 30 | 27 |
| Audit-related services | 21 | 16 |
| Tax advisory | 12 | 11 |
| Other | 5 | 4 |
| 1) Total |
69 | 58 |
1) Of which PricewaterhouseCoopers SEK 65m (55).
The President and GEC are regularly informed aboutinternal audit matters. Group Internal Audit's work is evaluated in a quality assessment, atleast every fifth year, by an independent party. Group Internal Audit co-ordinates its work covering the bank's financialreporting with the bank's external auditor. The bank's external auditorrelies to some extent on the work of Group Inter nal Auditin its assignmentto review the group's financialreporting. This requires thatthe external auditor evaluates Group Inter nal Audit's work. The conclusion ofthis evaluation is reported to the ACC and Group Internal Audit.
SEB's organisation
| President & CEO | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Large Corporates & Financial Institutions | Corporate & Private Customers | Baltic | ||||
| Life & Investment Management | ||||||
| Business Support (IT Service Delivery, IT Services and Operations) | ||||||
| Group Staff & Control Functions (CFO, CRO, Strategy, HR, Legal, Marketing and Communications) |
Remuneration report
SEB aims to attract and retain committed and competent employ ees who are eagerto develop and contribute to the bank's longterm success. Employee remuneration should encourage high performance, sound and responsible behaviour based on SEB's values, and risk-taking thatis aligned with the level ofrisk toler ance set by the Board of Directors. The ambition is to promote the employees' long-term commitmentto creating sustainable value for customers and shareholders.
The totalremuneration reflects the complexity,responsibility and leadership skills required in each position aswell as the per formance ofthe individual employee. SEB applies a performance and development process thatis based on transparent and individual goals and is used as a foundation for setting employee remuneration. Performance is evaluated on the basis offinancial and non-financial goals,with SEB's values as a starting point.
Remuneration Policy
Remuneration principles for SEB are laid outin SEB'sRemuneration Policy,which is revised annually. The Board'sRemuneration and HumanResources Committee (RemCo) drafts revisions for adoption by the Board. The policy stipulates thatremuneration shall be alignedwith the bank's strategy, goals, values and long-terminter ests, and assurances shall bemade that conflicts ofinterest are avoided. The policy also reflects Swedish and internationalrules and regulations.Forinformation onRemCo, see p. 58.
In consultation with the Board's Risk and Capital Committee, RemCo reviews the Remuneration Policy and verifies thatthe remuneration structure takes into accountthe bank's risks, longterm earnings capacity, and cost ofliquidity and capital. This review is based on, among otherthings, a risk analysis performed jointly by Group Risk, Group Compliance and Group Human Resources.
The Remuneration Policy lays outthe principles foridentifying employees in positions with a material impact on the group's risk profile (Identified Staff), who are subjectto specialrules on how remuneration is to be set and paid out. In 2017 a total of 989 positions (1,167) at SEB were categorised as Identified Staff. The pol icy also specifies how the bank identifies and compensates employees who can impactthe risk profiles of mutualfunds, who provide investment advice or have a material impact on the services and products offered.
Finally,the Policy stipulates that employees in controlfunctions shall be remunerated in a mannerthatis independent ofthe business areas thatthey oversee and is commensurate with their key roles in the organisation, as well as is based on goals that are compatible with theirfunctions.

Remuneration structure
The bank's remuneration structure consists mainly of base salary and variable remuneration as well as pensions and other benefits.
Base salary
The base salary, which accounts for most of an employee's remuneration, shall be competitive and commensurate with the employee's experience,responsibility and long-term performance. It shall also be in line with industry peers in the respective geographical markets in which SEB operates.
Variable remuneration
Variable remuneration consists oflong-term equity-based programmes and,to a limited extent, individual cash-based variable remuneration.
All variable remuneration is based on SEB's risk-adjusted per formance. The variable remuneration models are adapted to applicable rules governing, among otherthings,the maximum share ofthe employee's base salary,the deferred portion of remuneration, and the rightto reduce and withhold deferred remuneration that has not yet been paid out. ForIdentified Staff, variable remuneration may not exceed 100 per cent oftheir base salary.
The variable remuneration models are based on financial and non-financial key ratios at group level. Individual variable remuneration is also based on the performance ofthe employee's unit and includes an annual evaluation of performance and behav iours atthe individual level. Non-financial goals take into account such factors as development of customer satisfaction, compli ance and sustainability factors with respectto the bank's own environmental impact as well as the integration of sustainability into the business model. Atthe individual level, key parameters are compliance with rules and policies forrisk-taking in the group, SEB's Code of Conduct and demands on internal controls ofthe business areas.
Long-term equity-based programmes
Equity-based remuneration is a means to attract and retain staff with key competence. Itis also an incentive for employees to become shareholders of SEB, which creates a long-term commitmentthatis aligned with the shareholders' interests. Regulatory requirements forfinancial institutions require that variable remuneration shall consistlargely of equity or equity-related instruments. SEB's long-term equity programmes are evaluated on a continuous basis throughoutthe year by RemCo, which also monitors the employees' participation in the programmes. SEB conducts a dialogue with institutional investors on the structure and content ofthe programmes.
The 2017 Annual General Meeting (AGM) resolved on two sep arate programmes forthe year,the SEB All Employee Programme 2017 (AEP) and the SEB Share Deferral Programme 2017 (SDP).
In both programmes there is a possibility ofrisk adjustmentfor both current and future risks. The final outcome may therefore subsequently be reduced partially or completely in accordance with currentrules, among otherthings taking into accountthe bank's earnings and the capital and liquidity required forthe business operations.
Individual cash-based variable remuneration Approximately ten per cent of employees are eligible forindivid ual cash-based variable remuneration (short-term incentive
Remuneration in SEB in 2017 SEK thousands
| Base salary |
Cash-based variable remuneration |
Expensed amount long-term equity based programmes |
Benefits | P Total ensions | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| President and CEO Johan Torgeby 1) |
7,125 | 1,523 | 112 | 8,760 | 2,625 | |
| 2) President and CEO Annika Falkengren |
2,875 | 168 | 3,043 | 1,250 | ||
| 3) Other members ofthe GEC |
49,225 | 15,489 | 1,854 | 66,568 | 16,918 | |
| Total | 59,225 | 0 | 17,012 | 2,134 | 78,371 | 20,793 |
| SEB excluding GEC | 8,014,211 | 665,751 | 599,238 | 89,940 | 9,369,141 | 1,333,007 |
| SEB Total | 8,073,436 | 665,751 | 616,250 | 92,074 | 9,447,512 | 1,353,800 |
1) President and CEO as of 29 March. All amounts referto the period 29 March -31 December. During this time J. Torgeby did not exercise any rights.
2) President and CEO up until 28 March. All amounts referto the period 1 January - 28 March. During this time A. Falkengren did not exercise any rights.
3) The number and composition differ somewhat during the year but on average eleven members are included. The GEC, excluding the President, exercised rights to a value of SEK 23,030,558.
programme, STI), and only in operations in which itis standard market practice, such as investment banking. STI is used only when it entails low or no residualrisk for SEB. For employees who receive variable remuneration above a certain level, a portion of this remuneration must be deferred. In 2017, STI accounted for 2 per cent (3) of SEB's total staff costs.
Remuneration ofthe President and members ofthe Group Executive Committee
SEB's Board of Directors decides on the remuneration ofthe President and other members ofthe Group Executive Committee (GEC) based on a recommendation by RemCo. Theirremunera tion shall be in line with the guidelines set by the AGM.
Totalremuneration forthe members ofthe GEC is based on the main components of base salary, long-term equity-based remuneration (SDP), and pensions and other benefits. No cash-based variable remuneration is paid, and the members ofthe GEC are not eligible forthe AEP. Pension plans for members ofthe GEC are defined-contribution solutions, with the exception of a defined benefit component provided under collective agreements. The pension plans are in line with the SEB group's Pension Policy. A maximum offive days of vacation can be accumulated per year.
The SEB All Employee Programme (AEP) 2017 is a
profit-sharing programme for employees in most ofthe countries where SEB operates. Half ofthe outcome is paid in cash, and the other halfis deferred forthree years. The deferred amountis paid outin SEB Class A shares orin cash, adjusted forthe totalreturn on SEB Class A shares. Payment ofthe deferred part normally requires thatthe individualremains employed during the three years ofthe programme. The programme's targets are setin SEB's business plan and consist ofthe financialtargets forreturn on equity and the bank's cost development, and ofthe non-financialtargetfor customer satisfaction.
All Employee Programmes
| 20171) | 20162) | |
|---|---|---|
| Number of participants | 15,000 | 15,000 |
| Outcome in relation to maximum amount 3), % | 56 | 56 |
| Shares allotted,thousands | 2,538 | 2,666 |
| Market value per 31 December, SEKm | 244 | 255 |
| 4) Total cash per participant |
42,000 | 42,000 |
Payout year: 1) 2020, 2) 2019, 3) SEK 75,000, 4) in Sweden
Fortermination of employmentinitiated by the bank, a maximum of 12 months' severance pay is payable, afterthe notice period. SEB has the rightto deductincome earned from other employmentfrom any severance pay.
RemCo evaluates the guidelines for salary and other benefits paid to the President and other GEC members on a continuous basis throughoutthe year. To perform this evaluation, RemCo obtains information from the Head of Group Human Resources, the Head of Group Internal Audit and the external auditor, and with respectto GEC members, also from the President. In addition, comparative studies are made yearly with relevant sectors and markets. The result of such studies is a significantfactorin setting the total level ofremuneration for members ofthe GEC. This internal and external information facilitates RemCo in its work on ensuring thatremuneration at SEB is aligned with the market and is competitive.
Priorto the 2017 AGM the bank's external auditorissued a statementto the Board assuring that SEB has adhered to the guidelines for salary and otherremuneration forthe President and other GEC members set by the 2016 AGM.
Forfurtherinformation about SEB's remuneration structure, see note 9 and the AGM information on sebgroup.com.
The SEB ShareDeferral Programme (SDP) 2017 is a pro-
gramme for members of GEC, certain other senior managers and a number of other key employees, up to 2,000 in total. The participants are granted an individually determined number of conditional share rights based on the fulfilment of predetermined group, business unit and individualtargets outlined in SEB's business plan. In addition to the AEP targets, the SDP is based on parameters such as compliance, employee commitment, sustainability work and risk management. The remuneration normally requires thatthe individual remains employed during the three years ofthe programme. In addition is a period of up to three years with restricted right of disposal. The reward may be forfeited ifthe performance on which it was initially based subsequently needs to be revised downward and/orthe individual is found to be responsible for actions that are incompatible with internal rules and guidelines.
Share Deferral Programmes
| 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|
| Number of participants | 1,448 | 1,374 |
| Shares allotted,thousands | 4,646 | 5,611 |
| Market value per 31 December, SEKm | 447 | 536 |
Ownership transferred to the individual after 3 or 5 years.
Internal control overfinancialreporting
Internal Control over Financial Reporting (ICFR) is a well-established process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and reduce the risk for misstatements. ICFR is based on the framework established by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) and is conducted by SEB in a yearly cycle as described below.
Perform risk assessment Per
In orderto identify and understand which risks exist, financialresults and balance sheets are analysed at SEB group and unitlevels. These risk assessments are used to determine which units, processes and systems are to be covered by the ICFR process in the coming year according to the materiality principle. 1 ord finan g t b
Identify risks and expected controls Ide
People with expertise in the business and finance functions evaluate ifthe controls are effective, if new risks have been identified and if new controls need to be in place to coverthe risks more effectively. The controls are communicated to involved parties within the bank in orderto clarify expectations and responsibilities. The framework consists of group-wide controls as well as controls of processes and IT – for example, analysis ofthe balance sheet and income statement, account reconciliations and controls of system access. 2 Peop e b t
Plan Pla
Every year a plan is prepared based on the risk assessments and expected controls. The plan clarifies who is responsible for evaluating the respective controls within each unit, what type of evaluation should be conducted and how the results are to be reported. At this stage the plan is coordinated with the plans of internal and external audit. 3 Ever men res with cond

Evaluate controls Ev
The controls are evaluated on a continuous basis throughoutthe year by the control owners through self-assessments. In this way the bank's weaknesses can be identified, compensating controls can be implemented and improvements can be made. Furthermore,reporting is done quarterly by financial managers to gain an assurance ofthe reported figures from each unit. The evaluation describes material financialreporting risks (ifthere are any) and comments on material deviations compared with earlier quarters. 4 Ththr sel b imp
Report Re
The results ofthe evaluations of controls are analysed to assess the risk for misstatements in the financial reporting. ICFR monitoring reports are submitted on a quarterly basis to SEB's group CFO in connection with the quarterly externalfinancialreporting. Reporting is also done to the Audit and Compliance Committee (ACC) once a year. The group-level ICFR reportincludes a description ofthe residualrisk, an assessment ofidentified control gaps and whether they are compensated by other controls, and how the work with gap remediation activities is progressing. The report contributes to transparency in the SEB organisation and enables prioritisation ofimprovement activities based on the residualrisk. 5 r as a repo qu t
In addition to this process, Internal Auditindepen dently tests controls within the ICFR framework.
The 2017 main focus areas
In addition to the ongoing work during 2017,the following main areas were in focus within the ICFR framework:
- The reporting standard IFRS 9 Financial Instruments took effect on 1 January 2018 and replaced IAS 39 Financial Instruments. The new standard has a significantimpact on the bank's reported results,the ways of working and the system support. In 2017 new controls were developed to follow up the transition and to ensure thatthe new reporting is fair and reliable.
- Variable remuneration and pensions are complex areas, which were prioritised during the year. New controls were developed in 2016 and were followed up and evaluated in 2017.
Sustainability Report 2017
About this report
This report describes how the SEB Group works with sustainability as stipulated by the Swedish Annual Accounts Act, more specifically in the areas:
- Human rights
- Labourrights and socialrelations
- Anti-corruption
- Environment.
The report covers SEB Group,thatis,the parent company Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (publ) and its subsidiaries (see note 25). Key aspects of SEB's sustainability work, such as risk management, corporate governance and staff composi tion,remuneration and benefits, are included in other parts of SEB's Annual Report. The policy on diversity applied forthe Board is also described in the corporate governance reportsee p. 54. SEB reports according to the framework Global Reporting Initia tive, GRI Standards, core option.
For a general description ofthe sustainability work, see
SEB's Sustainability Overview 2017, which includes the GRI Index. SEB's auditor, PwC, has been engaged to perform limited assur ance procedures for both SEB's Sustainability Report 2017 and SEB's Sustainability Overview 2017.
About SEB's business
SEB is a leading Nordic financial services group, guided by a strong beliefthat entrepreneurial minds and innovative compa nies are key to creating a better world.
In Sweden and the Baltic countries, SEB offers financial advice and a wide range offinancial services to corporates and private individuals. In Denmark, Finland, Norway, Germany and in the United Kingdom the bank's operations focus on a full-service offering to corporate and institutional customers. The bank strives to provide customers with services that are insightful, transparent and accessible on theirterms.Read more about SEB's business model on p. 6–7.
Approach to sustainability
In the course ofits business, SEB directly and indirectly impacts the markets and communities where it operates. The most importantimpactis presented first, being it direct orindirect.
SEB defines corporate sustainability as its delivery oflongterm value in economic, ethical, social and environmentalterms. Therefore, SEB integrates corporate sustainability in its activities by taking a broad business approach and targeting three areas – Responsible Business, People and Community, and Environment.
SEB believes that maintaining trust among relevant stakeholders is of paramountimportance. Equally, SEB recognises the importance ofintegrating sustainability aspects into its own business as well as contributing to sustainable development globally and thus supporting,for example,the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). During 2017, sustainability aspects were further strengthened in SEB's business planning,risk and credit processes, and were increasingly included in product development.
The bank adheres to applicable laws and regulations and maintains high ethical standards. SEB's Corporate Sustainability Policy,the Code of Conduct as well as internalrules and proce dures are in place, supported by a culture based on openness, business acumen and SEB's core values.
Policies and guidelines
SEB has adopted global initiatives and international codes of conduct which guide business decisions and the overall sustainability work. These include:
- UN Global Compact
- UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights
- The eightILO Core Conventions on Labour Standards
- UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights
- Children's Rights and Business Principles
- OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises
- UN-supported Principles for Responsible Investments (PRI)
- UN Environment Programme Finance Initiative (UNEPFI)
- Equator Principles.
In the area of sustainability, SEB abides by the Corporate Sustainability Policy,the Environmental Policy,the Human Rights Policy, Code of Conduct, Code of Conductfor suppliers and the Tax Policy. SEB has three position statements (Child Labour, Climate Change and Fresh Water) and six sector polices (Arms and Defence, Forestry, Fossil Fuel, Mining and Metals, Renewable Energy and Shipping). These provide guidelines on best practice as well as on the international conventions and standards that the bank adheres to and encourages its customers to follow. SEB aims to work with customers and portfolio companies towards improved business practices.
The table below shows which SEB policies and position statements that are particularly applicable to each ofthe four sections in this report.
| Human rights |
Labour rights and social relations |
Anti- corruption |
Environ ment |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate Sustainability Policy |
✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
| Environmental Policy | ✔ | |||
| Human rights Policy | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | |
| Tax policy | ✔ | |||
| Code of Conduct | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | |
| Code of conduct for suppliers |
✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
| Position statement on child labour |
✔ | ✔ | ||
| Position statement on fresh water |
✔ | |||
| Position statement on climate change |
✔ |
The Corporate Sustainability Policy provides a description of how the bank reviews the adherence to the Corporate Sustainability Policy, otherrelated polices and international commitments.
Principles applicable forthe four sections in this report
Asset management
SEB's investmentmanagement strategy is based on continuous engagementwith the companies that SEBinvests in. Thismeans that SEB,through positive selection, includes companies that excel in environmental, social and governance aspects. In addition, SEB can also exclude companies that do not abide by SEB's sustainability criteria.All SEBmutualfunds exclude companies involved in production ormarketing of controversialweapons and the develop ment or production of nuclearweapons programmes. Furthermore, SEB's sustainable and ethicalfunds do notinvestin companies that failto respectinternational conventions and guidelines.
SEBengagesdirectlyin adialoguewith companies'managements andboardsofdirectors regarding howtomakeimprovements in issues relatedtohumanrights, labourrights andsocialrelations, anti-corruptionandenvironment.SEBalsoworks incollaboration witheachrespectivefundmanager.As regards international compa nies,SEBcollaborateswithotherinvestorsaswellaswithpartners likeHermes EOS,InstitutionalInvestorsGrouponClimateChange (IIGCC),CarbonDisclosureProject (CDP) andPRIClearinghouse.
Mutualfunds fromsuppliersotherthanSEB(externalfunds)are evaluatedbyaspecialfundanalystteam.Allnewexternalfund management companiesarerequiredtosignthePrinciples for ResponsibleInvestment (PRI)ortofollowanequivalent sustainabilityframework internally,andtoexcludecontroversialweapons.
Financing andcredit granting
SEBtakes great care to knowits customerswell and views responsible financing and credit granting as a cornerstone ofits business, creating sustainable customer and shareholder value. SEBincludes risks and opportunities related to environmental, social and governance aspects in the creditreview. In the customer dialogues,the bank engages on the same aspects on a regular basis.These aspects include human rights, labourrights and socialrelations, anti-corruption and environment. The aimis to understand the customers' challenges and opportunities so that SEBcanmake the appropriate credit considerations and be a better business partner.
During the year,the creditrisk rating processwas further strengthened to bemore automatedwhen it comes to data gathering,reports and data storage. In addition, sustainability factors have been included in the systemsupportforthis process. For project financing, SEBhas adhered to the EquatorPrinciples since2007, requiring the project ownerto conduct due diligence in the appraisal phase ofthe project.
Suppliers
SEBhasestablished,andmaintains,procedures toevaluateand select suppliersandcontractors,basedonfinancial,environmental andsocialaspects.This includeshumanrights, labourrights, social relationsandanti-corruption.Theseaspectsaretakenintoaccountin procurementdecisionsalongwithcommercialaspects.SEBmonitors suppliers'processesandperformancewhereappropriate.Read moreaboutSEB'sprocessat sebgroup.com
HumanRights
SEB's approach to human rights issuesparticularly influences how itmanages employees, suppliers andrelationshipswith customers andportfolio companies.Itis an intrinsicpart ofSEB's commitment to ethicalbusiness.SEB's aimis to avoidcausing, contributing to, or being complicitthroughdirectlinkage to adverse human rights impact.Respecting andpromoting human rights supportsSEB's business strategy andrelationshipswith key stakeholders.SEB
requires the same commitmentto human rights fromits corporate customers andworks toidentifypotential human rights abusewithin its own operations andin itsbusiness relationships.SEB's starting pointis to use its leverage toprevent andmitigatepotentialrisks.
Initsbusiness,SEBisguidedbyglobalinitiatives, international standards,SEB'spoliciesandpositionstatements,alllistedonp.67.
Indirect impact
Areas where SEB can potentially contribute or have linkage to indirectimpact are categorised into asset management,financing and credit granting, and suppliers. SEB assesses these areas in orderto detect possible violations against human rights. Based on prioritisation, proportionality and leverage,findings are acted upon to prevent, mitigate and remediate potential impact. SEB expects its customers and portfolio companies to follow the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Asset management
In addition to SEB's general principles regarding assetmanagement outlined to the left, specifically in the area of human rights, SEB funds do notinvestin companies thatfailto respectinternational conventions and guidelines, such as theUniversalDeclaration of HumanRights and theUNGlobalCompact.
In2017, particularfocuswas on the human rights in the extractive sector and on access tomedicine in developing countries.
Financing andcredit granting
In addition to SEB's general principles regarding financing and credit granting outlined to the left, it shall be noted that human rights aspects are a crucial part.The bank engageswith customers on a regular basis on aspects concerning human rights in orderto under stand their challenges and opportunities so that SEBcanmake the appropriate credit considerations and be a better business partner.
Direct impact
Customers
The righttoprivacy is one oftheUN'sUniversalHumanRights.The trust ofSEB's customers is the foundation forthebank's activities andisbasedon respectfor andprotection ofthe customers'privacy. SEBisworking actively tobe compliantwith theGeneralData ProtectionRegulation (GDPR),the reformed data protection legislation thatwill enterinto force in all EUmember countries in2018.The GDPRwill strengthen the individuals'rights in terms of howtheir data ismanagedby companies.See p.51.
Employees
As an employer, SEBhas a responsibility to ensure that all employees are treated equally andwith respect. Everyone should be given the same opportunities for professional and personal development. SEBrejects allforms of discrimination and harassment,whether this is based on an individual's ethnic or national origin, gender, skin colour,faith,religion, citizenship, age, disability, civil status or sexual orientation. This is equally importantin relation to customers and other stakeholders as in relation to colleagues.
SEBperforms an employee survey each yearwhere all employees getthe opportunity to anonymously rate the company in various areas such aswork environment, employee engagement, and internal collaboration.
| KPI | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| SEB funds managed with human rights criteria, | ||
| as share of Fund Company AuM, per cent: | 100 | 14 |
Labourrights andsocialrelations
SEB works proactively to achieve a sound workplace. A healthy work environmentis essentialto the well-being ofthe bank's employees and thereby lays the foundation for successful busi ness results. Values and mindset as well as individual ability, development and potential are importantlong-term success factors for being part of SEB's team. The business shall be under pinned by strong ethics and good governance, long-term relationships and highly committed people who, based on the core values, work towards the corporate strategy.
In its business, SEB is guided by global initiatives, international standards, SEB's policies and position statements.See p. 67.
Direct impact
Labourrights
All of SEB's employees are covered by collective orlocal agree ments orlabourlaw. A continuous dialogue is carried on with employees, employee representatives and with trade unions. SEB has had a European Works Council (EWC) since 2003. The representatives are elected in accordance with Swedish legislation and are in proportion to the number of employees employed in each EEA (European Economic Area) country where SEB is represented. The EWC gives the employee representatives the opportunity to consult with each other and develop a common transnational mindset and view. Employees are also represented on SEB's Board of Directors through two directors and two deputy directors. All organisational changes in Sweden are negotiated with employee representatives.
Health and safety
A safe and sound work environment combined with good health and work/life balance form the foundation for SEB's employees' performance and job satisfaction. In SEB, managers have overall responsibility to promote well established working conditions. In Sweden, SEB has strengthened its supportfor managers with employees on sick leave,related to stress and workload, by offer ing professionaltelephone support. All employees are responsi ble for contributing to a sound balance between work and leisure time in orderto limit stress-related problems. An annual work environmentinspection together with the manageris mandatory within all parts of SEB. The bank follows national health and safety legislation in the countries where it operates as well as the European Framework Directive on Safety and Health at Work.
Inclusion and diversity
Inclusion and diversity among employees are importantfactors to build relationships with an increasingly diverse customer base and to improve the capacity forinnovation. SEB believes that different perspectives enhance creativity and problem solving and contribute to good decisions. All employees shall be offered equal opportunities to develop individually,regardless of gender, ethnicity, age, sexual orientation orreligion. SEB strives to achieve gender balance at every level within the organisation and to increase the share of employees with an international background. The bank is working actively, both in terms of structures and processes and in specific initiatives,to increase the number of women in higher operative roles and in seniorleaderroles.
In 2017, SEB initiated a process to furtherfocus on inclusion and diversitywithin the bank. The Board ofDirectors adopted a strategy describing theway forward for strengthening inclusion and diversity in SEB. The implementationwill begin in2018.
Learning and development
Continuous learning is an important prerequisite forthe ability to adaptto newcircumstances.The bank has awide range of programmes that are accessible through a digital platform,which provides courses that are specific for SEBaswell as courses offered by external suppliers.Atotal of600courses are offered in categories such as IT, projectmanagement, service design, languages, finance, sales, leadership, sustainability and communication. Identifying talents and promoting competence development are part of a manager's responsibilities. Employees also have individualresponsibility fortheir development.This ismonitored atleast yearly in the individualPerformance andDevelopmentDiscussions (PDDs) that are conducted by employees and theirmanagers.
Indirect impact
Asset management
In addition to SEB's general principles regarding assetmanagement outlined on p.68, specifically in the area oflabourrights and social relations,the funds do notinvestin companies thatfailto respect international conventions and guidelines, such as theUN Global Compact and the eightILOCore Conventions on Labour Standards.
Financing and credit granting
In addition to SEB's general principles regarding financing and credit granting outlined on p.68, it shall be noted thatthe area of labourrights and socialrelations are a crucial part. The bank engageswith customers on a regular basis on aspects concerning labourrights and socialrelations in orderto understand their challenges and opportunities so that SEBcanmake the appropriate credit considerations and be a better business partner.
Direct and indirect impact
Corporate citizenship
SEB sees the need for knowledge sharing in societies where the bank operates. SEB can thereby empower people to make more informed financial decisions and contribute to betterfunctioning societies. SEB supports local communities and shares both time and money, working with carefully chosen partners. Focus is on future generations in the areas ofinnovation and entrepreneurship,financial literacy and social inclusion.
| KPI | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Employees with collective orlocal bargaining agreement or covered by labourlaw, per cent |
100 | 100 |
| Gender by managementtype (male/female), per cent |
||
| All managers, per cent | 53/47 | 54/46 |
| Senior managers, per cent | 69/31 | 69/31 |
| Group Executive Committee, per cent | 83/17 | 75/25 |
Anti-corruption
SEB's reputation is built on insightful customerrelationships, where a strong risk culture based on business acumen and professional conductis essential. SEB's Code of Conduct and core values, mandatory training, and dialogues on ethical and value related dilemmas strengthen awareness ofthe importance of conduct. SEB actively counteracts allforms of corruption, in line with rules and regulations. These include external as well as inter nal incidents, processes and behaviours related to corruption.
In its business, SEB is guided by global initiatives, international standards, SEB's policies and position statements.See p. 67.
Direct impact
SEB aims to detect and preventfinancial crime such as fraud, money laundering and financing ofterrorism as well as insider trading and market manipulation.
SEB is committed to continuously strengthen the capability to detect and preventfinancial crime across the whole group. The bank monitors officialregisters ofindividuals and organisations that could be linked to money laundering,fraud and terrorism. Sophisticated systems are used to monitortransactions for sus picious behaviour associated with money laundering,financing of terrorism and market abuse. Suspicious activities are reported to the relevant authorities.
SEB believes that a strong Know-Your-Customer (KYC) process is the best method of preventing money laundering and financing ofterrorism. The bank shall always ensure the identity ofthe cus tomers and any person acting on behalf of a customer as well as understand the control and ownership structure ofits customers. SEB monitors ongoing business relationships by verifying and documenting thattransactions carried out match the customer's risk profile, business and source offunds. Enhanced due diligence is applied for customers, products and countries where there is a higherrisk thatthe bank can be used for money laundering and financing ofterrorism.
Bribery
SEB does not tolerate the bank becoming involved in or associ ated with bribery under any circumstances. No SEB employee, board member, independent contractor, consultant or other party associated with SEB may be involved directly orindirectly in offering, promising, giving, soliciting, or accepting a bribe. A bribe means any payment or other benefit that is intended or can reasonably be expected to influence a person's performance of their duty. In case employees encounterthem, they should report them to theirline manager and Group Compliance. SEB does not pay so-called facilitation payments (i.e., payments not stipulated in law or otherregulations that are levied by public officials forthe formal handling of cases at courts or other authorities).
Employee training
SEB's employees play a key role in the ability to discover suspi cious behaviour and transactions, and thereby preventthese types of crimes. SEB offers various types oftraining for employees, including an education package with e-learning,films and working material. Four digitaltraining sessions are mandatory for all employees – the Code of Conduct (including work against corruption), Anti-money laundering, Prevention offraud and Cyber security. All new employees must complete these sessions within the firstthree months of employment. Existing employees are required to complete them every three years.
Whistleblowing process
SEB has a whistleblowing process forreporting irregularities. If an employee or other person should discover possible unethical or unlawful behaviour,the observation should be reported. The identity ofthe reporter will be kept confidential during the subse quentfollow-up, enquiries and discussions relating to the matter, provided thatthe bank is not obliged by law to disclose it.
Notifications come from employees, but could also come from customers, suppliers and other stakeholders.
In 2017, SEB's whistleblowing process was strengthened and it is now also possible to report via an external digital service, called WhistleB. The service is entirely outside of SEB and meets the most stringent security requirements regarding encryption, data security and protection of the whistleblower's identity.
Indirect impact
SEB engages directly with its customers and portfolio companies on issues related to environmental, social and governance aspects, including anti-corruption issues.
Asset management
In addition to SEB's general principles regarding asset management outlined on p. 68, specifically in the anti-corruption area the funds do not invest in companies that fail to respect interna tional conventions and guidelines, such as the UN Global Compact and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises.
Financing and credit granting
In addition to SEB's general principles regarding financing and credit granting outlined on p. 68, it shall be noted thatthe area of anti-corruption is a crucial part. The bank engages with customers on a regular basis on ethical aspects, including anti-corrup tion, in orderto understand their challenges and opportunities so that SEB can make the appropriate credit considerations and be a better business partner.
| KPI | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| SEB employees that have completed the code of conducttraining (including anti |
||
| corruption), per cent | 91 | 63 |
| Suspicious AML activity reports, number | 504 | 489 |
Environment
Among environmentalrisks and opportunities, global climate change is the most serious challenge. SEB recognises the impor tance oflimiting the average globaltemperature rise to well below the 2°C target, which makes a transition to a low-carbon economy vital. SEB is working to reduce both its direct and indirectimpact.
In its business, SEB is guided by global initiatives, international standards, SEB's policies and position statements.See p. 67.
Indirect impact
Climate- and environmentrelated issues are becoming increas ingly importantfinancialrisk factors. Rightly managed,they can also be opportunities. Extreme weather, sea levelrise and longterm climate change affect billions of people in rural areas as well as in cities. As a bank, SEB's largest environmental impactis indirectthrough its asset management business, and its financing and credit granting.
Asset management
In addition to SEB's general principles regarding asset management outlined on p. 68, SEB's focus is on reducing carbon emissions in its investment management activities. SEB has put a cap on coal and does notinvestin companies involved in thermal coal extraction, i.e., mining activities in which thermal coal accounts for more than 20 per cent ofthe company's or group's turnover. SEB is actively engaged with European energy companies, where coal as an energy source exceeds 10 per cent,to reduce carbon emissions by using otherfuel alternatives. Since 2017, SEB is also engaged,together with Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change, (IIGCC),targeting the world's 100 largest carbon emitters in orderto reduce emissions globally.
SEB is continuously developing its mutualfund offering. The sustainability funds exclude companies that extract coal, gas and oil and focus on positive selection in the portfolio management, i.e., inclusion of companies with effective waste management, low carbon emissions and good water usage.
Financing and credit granting
In addition to SEB's general principles regarding financing and credit granting outlined on p. 68,the bank engages with customers on a regular basis on environmental aspects (climate, waste, effluents, emissions, biodiversity and resource usage). The aim is to understand the customers' challenges and opportunities so that SEB can make the appropriate credit considerations and be a better business partner.
SEB has a strong focus on green financing solutions, such as green bonds. Per 2017, SEB is the third largest green bond under writerin the world. In 2017, SEB issued its first own green bond of EUR 500 million. The capital is earmarked forloans for green initiatives and solutions and is offered to large companies and finan cial institutions, municipalities, county councils and housing associations. Major categories in SEB's green bond is hydropower, wind power, clean transportation and sustainable forestry. In 2018, SEB willreport on the impactfrom the green bond to the investors.
SEB has established a green framework in orderto have a clear definition of whatis "green". This Green Bond Framework and Strategy,together with SEB's Environmental Policy and the accompanying sector policies, provide a robust basis for ensuring that SEB's Green Bonds promote low-carbon and climate change resilientinvestments.
SEB has decided to shift away from coal. Since 2015, SEB does not provide financing for new coal-fired power plants. Financing can only be considered for new coal-fired plants with committed use oftechnologies, such as "carbon capture", which substan tially reduce greenhouse gas emissions. SEB can supportlegacy customers in making environmentally beneficial improvements in theirtransformation away from coal.
Transparency and reporting
SEB believes it is important that businesses understand and respond to climate risks as well as seize opportunities to contrib ute to building a more resilient and sustainable global economy. Regulators in the EU and Sweden increasingly take environmentalrisks into consideration in their monitoring. G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors have instructed the Financial Stability Board (FSB) to review how the financial sector can take climate-related issues into account. The FSB has established an industry-led task force: the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) to support informed investment, lending, and insurance underwriting decisions and improve understanding and analysis of climate-related risks and opportunities. SEB has followed this work closely. SEB intends to draw on the knowledge from the report and develop internal processes in orderto transparently describe climate related financialrisks.
SEB has signed the Montreal Carbon Pledge international cli mate agreement and thereby commits to annually report on its carbon footprint. Since 2017, 92 per cent of SEB's equity funds are annually measured and reported on SEB's website. As one of the first banks, SEB has started to report on the climate footprint ofits mutualfunds from allthree central emission areas (scope 1–3) according to the Greenhouse Gas Protocol, which gives a more accurate picture. The calculations are based on the Fund Management Association's guidelines forfund companies operating in the Swedish market.
Direct impact
Although SEB's major environmental impactis indirect,the bank recognises the importance of and works actively to also reduce its direct environmental impact. Between 2008 and 2015,the bank reduced its carbon emissions by 54 per cent. The targetis a further 20 per centreduction of emissions and electricity consumption forthe period 2016 to 2020. Business travel is the most challenging source of carbon emissions. Even though there has been a reduction in emissions from company cars and paper use,the increase in travelling in 2017 resulted in a status quo when comparing the total SEB carbon emissions with 2016.
Business travel
Compared with 2016, emissions from business travel increased by 3 per centin 2017. Airtravel distance has increased as well as train travel distance. This shows thatthe initiatives SEB has taken to encourage alternative ways of meeting are not enough. Further efforts must be made into making alternatives to physicaltravelling available.
Energy use
SEB's electricity consumption decreased by 7 per centin 2017. The major part of electricity used is based on renewable sources, 91 per cent (88). The use of district heating has increased in 2017, resulting in a slight decrease of about 1 per cent of SEB's total energy usage. The emissions from energy use are aboutthe same in 2017 as in 2016.
Paper consumption
In 2017, SEB reduced total paper consumption by 10 per cent. The bank continued to digitalise annual statements to private customers, e.g.forfund accounts as well as for saving accounts. This has resulted in a decrease of 47 per cent,from 14.8 million to 7.7 million paper sheets.
Company cars
Carbon emissions from company cars decreased by 15 per cent in 2017 compared to 2016. During the same period, carbon emissions from the average SEB company car decreased by 1 per cent.
| KPI | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| SEB equity funds where carbon emission is meas | ||
| ured, per cent | 92 | N/A |
| SEB's total carbon emissions 1),tonnes | 20,537 | 20,437 |
| Total carbon emissions 1)/employee,tonnes | 1.37 | 1.34 |
1) Include the areas business travel, energy use, paper consumption and company cars.
Financial statements – Contents
| Note | Page | |
|---|---|---|
| The SEB Group |
||
| Income Statement | 73 | |
| Statement of comprehensive income | 74 | |
| Balance sheet | 75 | |
| Statement of changes in equity | 76 | |
| Cash flow statement | 77 | |
| Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken |
||
| Income Statement | 78 | |
| Statement of comprehensive income | 79 | |
| Balance sheet | 80 | |
| Statement of changes in equity | 81 | |
| Cash flow statement | 82 | |
| Notes to the financial statements |
||
| Corporate information | 83 | |
| 1 | Accounting policies | 83 |
| 1a | Significant changed accounting policies applicable from 1 January 2018 |
90 |
| 2 | Operating segments | 94 |
| 3 | Geographical information | 95 |
| 4 | Netinterestincome | 96 |
| 5 | Netfee and commission income | 97 |
| 6 | Netfinancial income | 98 |
| 7 | Net otherincome | 98 |
| 8 | Administrative expenses | 99 |
| 9 | Staff costs | 100 |
| 9a | Remuneration | 100 |
| 9b | Pensions | 103 |
| 9c | Remuneration to the Board and the Group Executive Committee |
106 |
| 9d | Share-based payments | 107 |
| 9e | Number of employees | 109 |
| 10 | Other expenses | 109 |
| 11 | Depreciation, amortisation and impairment of tangible and intangible assets |
110 |
| 12 | Gains less losses tangible and intangible assets | 110 |
| 13 | Net creditlosses | 110 |
| 14 | Appropriations | 111 |
| 15 | Taxes | 111 |
| 16 | Earnings per share | 113 |
| 17 | Risk disclosures | 113 |
| 17a | Creditrisk | 113 |
| 17b | Marketrisk | 118 |
| Note | Page | |
|---|---|---|
| 17c | Operationalrisk | 120 |
| 17d | Business risk | 121 |
| 17 e | Insurance risk | 121 |
| 17f | Liquidity risk | 121 |
| 18 | Cash and cash equivalents | 127 |
| 19 | Loans | 127 |
| 20 | Capital adequacy | 132 |
| 21 | Fair value measurement of assets and liabilities | 135 |
| 22 | Financial assets atfair value through profit orloss | 140 |
| 23 | Available-for-sale financial assets | 141 |
| 24 | Investments in associates | 141 |
| 25 | Shares in subsidiaries | 142 |
| 26 | Interestin unconsolidated structured entities | 143 |
| 27 | Related parties | 144 |
| 28 | Tangible and intangible assets | 145 |
| 29 | Other assets | 148 |
| 30 | Liabilities to policyholders | 148 |
| 31 | Financial liabilities atfair value through profit orloss | 149 |
| 32 | Otherliabilities | 149 |
| 33 | Provisions | 150 |
| 34 | Subordinated liabilities | 150 |
| 35 | Untaxed reserves | 151 |
| 36 | Pledged assets | 151 |
| 37 | Obligations | 152 |
| 38 | Current and non-current assets and liabilities | 153 |
| 39 | Financial assets and liabilities by class | 154 |
| 40 | Financial assets and liabilities subjectto offsetting or netting arrangements |
156 |
| 41 | Debt securities by issuers | 157 |
| 42 | Derivative instruments | 158 |
| 43 | Future minimum lease payments for operational leases | 160 |
| 44 | Finance leases | 160 |
| 45 | Assets and liabilities distributed by main currencies | 161 |
| 46 | Life insurance operations | 162 |
| 47 | Assets in unit-linked operations | 163 |
| 48 | Non-current assets and disposal groups classified as held for sale |
163 |
| 49 | Items affecting comparability | 163 |
| Five-year summary |
||
| The SEB Group | 164 |
Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken 165
Income Statement
SEB Group
| Interestincome 36,472 35,202 4 Interest expense –16,580 –16,464 1 Netinterestincome 4 19,893 18,738 6 Fee and commission income 23,196 22,500 3 Fee and commission expense –5,472 –5,872 –7 Netfee and commission income 5 17,725 16,628 7 Netfinancial income 6 6,880 7,056 –3 Dividends 77 170 –55 Profit and loss from investments in associates –38 218 Gains less losses from investment securities 203 371 –45 Other operating income 870 70 Net otherincome 7 1,112 829 34 Total operating income 45,609 43,251 5 Staff costs 9 –14,025 –14,422 –3 Other expenses 10 –6,947 –6,619 5 Depreciation, amortisation and impairment oftangible and intangible assets 11 –964 –771 25 Total operating expenses –21,936 –21,812 1 Profit before creditlosses 23,672 21,439 10 Gains less losses from tangible and intangible assets 12 –162 –150 8 Net creditlosses 13 –808 –993 –19 Operating profit before items affecting comparability 22,702 20,296 12 Items affecting comparability 49 –1,896 –5,429 –65 |
|---|
| Operating profit 20,806 14,867 40 |
| Income tax expense 15 –4,562 –4,249 7 |
| NET PROFIT 16,244 10,618 53 |
| Attributable to shareholders 16,244 10,618 53 |
| Basic earnings per share, SEK 16 7.49 4.88 |
| Diluted earnings per share, SEK 16 7.46 4.85 |
1) Items affecting comparability restated, see note 49.
Statement of comprehensive income
SEB Group
| SEKm | 2017 | 2016 | Change, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| NET PROFIT | 16,244 | 10,618 | 53 |
| Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit orloss: Valuation gains (losses) during the year Income tax on valuation gains (losses) during the year Transferred to profit orloss forthe year1) Income tax on transfers to profit orloss forthe year |
–2,166 397 1,122 –261 |
968 –84 103 3 |
|
| Available-for-sale financial assets | –909 | 990 | –192 |
| Valuation gains (losses) during the year Income tax on valuation gains (losses) during the year Transferred to profit orloss forthe year2) Income tax on transfers to profit orloss forthe year |
–1,536 338 –11 2 |
–1,064 234 24 –5 |
44 44 |
| Cash flow hedges | –1,207 | –811 | 49 |
| Translation offoreign operations Taxes on translation effects |
–17 313 |
327 423 |
–26 |
| Translation offoreign operations | 296 | 750 | –61 |
| Items that will not be reclassified to profit orloss: Remeasurement of pension obligations, including special salary tax Valuation gains (losses) on plan assets during the year Deferred tax on pensions |
–528 2,556 –1,244 |
–3,624 1,183 566 |
–85 116 |
| Defined benefit plans | 784 | –1,875 | |
| OTHERCOMPREHENSIVE INCOME | –1,036 | –946 | 10 |
| TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME | 15,208 | 9,672 | 57 |
| 1)Otherincome. |
2) Netinterestincome.
| Attributable to shareholders | 15,208 | 9,672 | 57 |
|---|---|---|---|
The method used to hedge currency risks related to foreign operations creates a tax expense (tax income) in the parent company. Fair value changes on the hedging instruments impactthe taxable result contrary to the currency revaluation ofthe foreign operations. In the Group this tax effectis reported in Other comprehensive income.
Balance sheet
SEB Group
| 31December, SEKm | Note | 2017 | 2016 | Change, % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash and cash balances at central banks | 18 | 177,222 | 151,078 | 17 |
| Otherlending to central banks | 12,778 | 66,730 | –81 | |
| Loans to creditinstitutions | 18, 19 | 34,715 | 50,527 | –31 |
| Loans to the public | 19 | 1,484,803 | 1,453,019 | 2 |
| Securities held fortrading | 157,885 | 162,516 | –3 | |
| Derivatives held fortrading | 98,281 | 198,271 | –50 | |
| Derivatives held for hedging | 6,587 | 14,084 | –53 | |
| Financial assets – designated atfair value through profit orloss | 313,203 | 410,155 | –24 | |
| Financial assets atfair value through profit orloss | 22 | 575,955 | 785,026 | –27 |
| Fair value changes of hedged items in a portfolio hedge | 93 | 111 | –16 | |
| Available-for-sale financial assets | 23 | 27,776 | 35,747 | –22 |
| Investment accounted for using the equity method | 472 | 268 | 76 | |
| Otherinvestments in associates | 842 | 970 | –13 | |
| Investments in subsidiaries and associates | 24, 25 | 1,314 | 1,238 | 6 |
| Intangible assets | 10,718 | 11,405 | –6 | |
| Property and equipment | 1,130 | 908 | 24 | |
| Investment properties | 203 | 7,845 | –97 | |
| Tangible and intangible assets | 28 | 12,052 | 20,158 | –40 |
| Current tax assets | 5,255 | 5,978 | –12 | |
| Deferred tax assets | 260 | 1,329 | –80 | |
| Tax assets | 15 | 5,515 | 7,307 | –25 |
| Trade and clientreceivables | 13,040 | 7,635 | 71 | |
| Otherfinancial assets | 19,007 | 29,239 | –35 | |
| Other non-financial assets | 11,316 | 12,244 | –8 | |
| Other assets | 29 | 43,362 | 49,118 | –12 |
| Non-current assets and disposal groups classified as held for sale | 48 | 184,011 | 587 | |
| TOTALASSETS | 2,559,596 | 2,620,646 | –2 | |
| Deposits from central banks and creditinstitutions | 89,076 | 119,864 | –26 | |
| Deposits and borrowing from the public | 1,004,721 | 962,028 | 4 | |
| Liabilities to policyholders – investment contracts | 284,291 | 296,618 | –4 | |
| Liabilities to policyholders – insurance contracts | 18,911 | 107,213 | –82 | |
| Liabilities to policyholders | 30 | 303,202 | 403,831 | –25 |
| Debt securities issued | 614,033 | 668,880 | –8 | |
| Liabilities held fortrading | 28,879 | 38,845 | –26 | |
| Derivatives held fortrading | 84,571 | 173,348 | –51 | |
| Derivatives held for hedging | 863 | 1,303 | –34 | |
| Financial liabilities atfair value through profit orloss | 31 | 114,313 | 213,496 | –46 |
| Fair value changes of hedged items in a portfolio hedge | 1,046 | 1,537 | –32 | |
| Current tax liabilities | 1,463 | 2,184 | –33 | |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 8,079 | 8,474 | –5 | |
| Tax liabilities | 15 | 9,542 | 10,658 | –10 |
| Trade and client payables | 13,142 | 8,926 | 47 | |
| Otherfinancial liabilities | 33,766 | 30,609 | –100 | |
| Other non-financial liabilities | 18,720 | 16,889 | ||
| Otherliabilities | 32 | 65,629 | 56,424 | 16 |
| Provisions | 33 | 3,009 | 2,233 | 35 |
| Subordinated liabilities | 34 | 32,390 | 40,719 | –20 |
| Liabilities of disposal groups classified as held for sale | 48 | 178,710 | ||
| Total liabilities | 2,415,671 | 2,479,670 | –3 | |
| Share capital | 21,942 | 21,942 | ||
| Otherreserves | 4,403 | 5,439 | –19 | |
| Retained earnings | 117,581 | 113,595 | 4 | |
| Shareholders' equity | 143,925 | 140,976 | 2 | |
| Total equity | 143,925 | 140,976 | 2 | |
| TOTAL LIABILITIESANDEQUITY | 2,559,596 | 2,620,646 | –2 |
Statement of changes in equity
SEB Group
| SEKm | Otherreserves | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Share capital 3) |
Available-for- sale financial assets |
Cash flow hedges |
Translation offoreign operations |
Defined benefit plans |
Retained earnings | Total Shareholders' equity 4) |
| Opening balance Net profit |
21,942 | 1,638 | 2,399 | –1,193 | 2,595 | 113,595 16,244 |
140,976 16,244 |
| Other comprehensive income (net oftax) | –909 | –1,207 | 296 | 784 | –1,036 | ||
| Total comprehensive income | –909 | –1,207 | 296 | 784 | 16,244 | 15,208 | |
| Dividend to shareholders 1) Equity-based programmes 2) Change in holding of own shares |
–11,935 –246 –78 |
–11,935 –246 –78 |
|||||
| CLOSINGBALANCE | 21,942 | 729 | 1,192 | –897 | 3,379 | 117,581 | 143,925 |
2016
| Opening balance Change in valuation ofinsurance contracts |
21,942 | 648 | 3,210 | –1,943 | 4,470 | 114,471 –440 |
142,798 –440 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adjusted opening balance | 21,942 | 648 | 3,210 | –1,943 | 4,470 | 114,031 | 142,358 |
| Net profit Other comprehensive income (net oftax) |
990 | –811 | 750 | –1,875 | 10,618 | 10,618 –946 |
|
| Total comprehensive income | 990 | –811 | 750 | –1,875 | 10,618 | 9,672 | |
| Dividend to shareholders 1) Equity-based programmes 2) Change in holding of own shares |
–11,504 433 17 |
–11,504 433 17 |
|||||
| CLOSINGBALANCE | 21,942 | 1,638 | 2,399 | –1,193 | 2,595 | 113,595 | 140,976 |
1)Dividend paid in 2017 for 2016 was SEK 5.50 (5.25) per ClassAshare and SEK 5.50 (5.25) per Class C share. Proposed dividend for 2017 is SEK 5.75. Furtherinformation can be found in the chapter Shareholders and the SEB share on page 29–31.Dividend to shareholders is reported excluding dividend on own shares.
2)As of 31 December 2015 SEB owned 0.9 million ClassAshares forthe long-termincentive programmes. In 2016 5.5 million ClassAshares were sold as stock options were exercised.During 2016, SEB also repurchased 29.8million ClassAshares.As of 31December 2016 SEB owned 25.2 million ClassAshares with a market value of SEK 2,406m. Another 5.0 million ClassAshares have been sold during 2017 as stock options were exercised.During 2017, SEB repurchased 7.0 million ClassAshares. As of 31December 2017 SEB owned 27.1 million ClassAshares with a market value of SEK 2,612m.
3) 2,170,019,294 ClassAshares (2,170,019,294); 24,152,508 Class C shares (24,152,508).
4) Information about capitalrequirements can be found in Note 20 Capital adequacy.
Cash flow statement
SEB Group
| SEKm | 2017 | 2016 | Change, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interestreceived | 37,724 | 35,507 | 6 |
| Interest paid | –17,690 | –17,515 | 1 |
| Commission received | 23,196 | 22,500 | 3 |
| Commission paid | –5,472 | –5,872 | –7 |
| Netreceived from financialtransactions | 14,748 | –7,621 | |
| Otherincome | 197 | 74 | 166 |
| Paid expenses | –21,200 | –21,464 | –1 |
| Taxes paid | –4,560 | –3,159 | 44 |
| Cash flow from the income statement | 26,943 | 2,450 | |
| Increase (–)/decrease (+) in portfolios | –8,683 | 62,438 | |
| Increase (+)/decrease (–) in issued short-term securities | –55,228 | 31 344 | |
| Increase (–)/decrease (+) in lending to creditinstitutions and central banks | 69,280 | –31,024 | |
| Increase (–)/decrease (+) in lending to the public | –34,853 | –104,145 | –67 |
| Increase (+)/decrease (–) in liabilities to creditinstitutions | –30,773 | 1,361 | |
| Increase (+)/decrease (–) in deposits and borrowings from the public | 43,010 | 78,243 | –45 |
| Increase (–)/decrease (+) in insurance portfolios | –180 | 329 | |
| Change in other assets | 17,343 | 3,281 | |
| Change in otherliabilities | 21,141 | –866 | |
| Cash flow from operating activities | 48,000 | 43,411 | 11 |
| Sales of shares and bonds | 761 | 1,075 | –29 |
| Sales ofintangible and tangible fixed assets | 70 | 110 | –36 |
| Dividends received | 77 | 170 | –55 |
| Investments/divestments in shares and bonds | –86 | –52 | 65 |
| Investments in intangible and tangible assets | –259 | –451 | –43 |
| Cash flow from investing activities | 564 | 852 | –34 |
| Issue of subordinated loans | 17,682 | –100 | |
| Repayment of subordinated loans | –7,169 | –9,196 | –22 |
| Dividend paid | –11,935 | –11,504 | 4 |
| Cash flow from financing activities | –19,104 | –3,018 | |
| NET CHANGE IN CASHANDCASHEQUIVALENTS | 29,460 | 41,245 | –29 |
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 158,315 | 110,770 | 43 |
| Exchange rate differences on cash and cash equivalents | –3,346 | 6,300 | |
| Netincrease in cash and cash equivalents | 29,460 | 41,245 | –29 |
| CASHANDCASHEQUIVALENTSAT ENDOF PERIOD1) | 184,429 | 158,315 | 16 |
1) Cash and cash equivalents are disclosed in note 18.
Reconciliation ofliabilities from financing activities
| TOTAL LIABILITIES FROM FINANCINGACTIVITIES | 32,390 | 40,719 | –20 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non-cash flow, interest accruals | –233 | 40 | |
| Non-cash flow,fair value changes | –600 | –335 | 79 |
| Non-cash flow, currency exchange | –327 | 1,156 | |
| Cash flows | –7,169 | 8,486 | |
| Opening balan ce | 40,719 | 31,372 | 30 |
Income Statement
In accordance with the Swedish Financial SupervisoryAuthority regulations
Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken
| SEKm | Note | 2017 | 2016 | Change, % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interestincome | 4 | 32,285 | 29,022 | 11 |
| Leasing income | 4 | 5,481 | 5,443 | 1 |
| Interest expense | 4 | –17,750 | –15,223 | 17 |
| Dividends | 6,981 | 6,581 | 6 | |
| Fee and commission income | 5 | 12,153 | 11,648 | 4 |
| Fee and commission expense | 5 | –2,596 | –2,805 | –7 |
| Netfinancial income | 6 | 4,493 | 4,642 | –3 |
| Otherincome | 7 | 1,342 | 817 | 64 |
| Total operating income | 42,390 | 40,125 | 6 | |
| Administrative expenses | 8 | –14,252 | –15,039 | –5 |
| Depreciation, amortisation and impairment oftangible and intangible assets | 11 | –6,377 | –5,775 | 10 |
| Total operating expenses | –20,629 | –20,814 | –1 | |
| Profit before creditlosses | 21,761 | 19,311 | 13 | |
| Net creditlosses | 13 | –749 | –789 | –5 |
| Impairment offinancial assets1) | –1,497 | –3,841 | –61 | |
| Operating profit | 19,515 | 14,681 | 33 | |
| Appropriations | 14 | 1,885 | 2,437 | –23 |
| Income tax expense | 15 | –3,633 | –2,877 | 26 |
| Othertaxes | 15 | 43 | 137 | –69 |
| NET PROFIT | 17,811 | 14,378 | 24 |
1)As a result ofimpairmenttestin SEBGroup, impairment of shares in subsidiaries has affected the parent company inQ1 2016 with an amount of SEK 2,687m.
Statement of comprehensive income
Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken
| SEKm | 2017 | 2016 | Change, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| NET PROFIT | 17,811 | 14,378 | 24 |
| Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit orloss: Valuation gains (losses) during the year Income tax on valuation gains (losses) during the year Transferred to profit orloss forthe year1) Income tax on transfers to profit orloss forthe year |
–1,920 314 933 –205 |
982 –85 299 –66 |
|
| Available-for-sale financial assets | –878 | 1,130 | |
| Valuation gains (losses) during the year Income tax on valuation gains (losses) during the year Transferred to profit orloss forthe year2) Income tax on transfers to profit orloss forthe year |
–1,536 338 –11 2 |
–1,064 234 24 –5 |
44 44 |
| Cash flowhedges | –1,207 | –811 | 49 |
| Translation offoreign operations | –8 | 25 | |
| Translation offoreign operations | –8 | 25 | |
| OTHERCOMPREHENSIVE INCOME | –2,093 | 344 | |
| TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME | 15,718 | 14,722 | 7 |
1)Otherincome.
2) Netinterestincome.
The method used to hedge currency risks related to foreign operations creates a tax expense (tax income) in the parent company. Fair value changes on the hedging instruments impactthe taxable result contrary to the currency revaluation ofthe foreign operations. In the Group this tax effectis reported in Other comprehensive income.
Balance sheet
Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken
| 31December, SEKm | Note | 2017 | 2016 | Change, % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash and cash balances at central banks | 18 | 97,741 | 70,671 | 38 |
| Loans to creditinstitutions | 18, 19 | 192,591 | 287,059 | –33 |
| Loans to the public | 19 | 1,196,824 | 1,172,095 | 2 |
| Securities held fortrading | 157,628 | 162,335 | –3 | |
| Derivatives held fortrading | 97,640 | 147,124 | –34 | |
| Derivatives held for hedging | 6,580 | 12,649 | –48 | |
| Otherfinancial assets atfair value through profit and loss | 9 | 87 | –90 | |
| Financial assets atfair value through profit and loss | 22 | 261,857 | 322,195 | –19 |
| Fair value changes of hedged items in a portfolio hedge | 32 | |||
| Available-for-sale financial assets | 23 | 10,521 | 12,063 | –13 |
| Investments in associates | 24 | 1,032 | 1,025 | 1 |
| Shares in subsidiaries | 25 | 50,567 | 50,611 | |
| Intangible assets | 1,597 | 2,023 | –21 | |
| Property and equipment | 34,487 | 35,163 | –2 | |
| Tangible and intangible assets | 28 | 36,084 | 37,186 | –3 |
| Currenttax assets | 1,999 | 2,990 | –33 | |
| Tax assets | 1,999 | 2,990 | –33 | |
| Trade and clientreceivables | 12,871 | 7,234 | 78 | |
| Otherfinancial assets | 22,282 | 29,177 | –24 | |
| Other non-financial assets | 7,761 | 7,538 | 3 | |
| Other assets | 29 | 42,914 | 43,949 | –2 |
| TOTALASSETS | 1,892,163 | 1,999,844 | –5 | |
| Deposits from central banks and creditinstitutions | 127,539 | 168,852 | –24 | |
| Deposits and borrowing from the public | 822,151 | 782,584 | 5 | |
| Debt securities issued | 610,292 | 664,186 | –8 | |
| Liabilities held fortrading | 28,879 | 38,845 | –26 | |
| Derivatives held fortrading | 86,127 | 132,861 | –35 | |
| Derivatives held for hedging | 863 | 972 | –11 | |
| Financial liabilities atfair value through profit and loss | 31 | 115,869 | 172,678 | –33 |
| Currenttax liabilities | 684 | 855 | –20 | |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 336 | 677 | –50 | |
| Tax liabilities | 1,020 | 1,532 | –33 | |
| Trade and client payables | 11,782 | 7,945 | 48 | |
| Otherfinancial liabilities | 34,350 | 29,922 | 15 | |
| Other non-financial liabilities | 10,466 | 8,211 | 27 | |
| Otherliabilities | 32 | 56,598 | 46,078 | 23 |
| Provisions | 33 | 113 | 80 | 41 |
| Subordinated liabilities | 34 | 32,390 | 40,719 | –20 |
| Total liabilities | 1,765,972 | 1,876,709 | –6 | |
| Untaxed reserves | 35 | 21,429 | 21,761 | –2 |
| Share capital | 21,942 | 21,942 | ||
| Restricted reserves | 13,425 | 12,701 | 6 | |
| Otherreserves | 1,476 | 3,571 | –59 | |
| Retained earnings | 50,108 | 48,782 | 3 | |
| Net profit | 17,811 | 14,378 | 24 | |
| Total equity | 104,762 | 101,374 | 3 | |
| TOTAL LIABILITIES,UNTAXEDRESERVESANDTOTAL EQUITY | 1,892,163 | 1,999,844 | –5 |
Statement of changes in equity
Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken
| SEKm | Restricted equity | Non-restricted equity 4) |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Share capital 3) |
Restricted reserves | Available- for-sale financial assets |
Cash flow hedges |
Translation offoreign operations |
Retained earnings |
Total Equity |
| Opening balance Net profit Other comprehensive income (net oftax) |
21,942 | 12,701 | 1,458 –878 |
2,400 –1,207 |
–287 –8 |
63,160 17,811 |
101,374 17,811 –2,093 |
| Total comprehensive income | –878 | –1,207 | –8 | 17,811 | 15,718 | ||
| Dividend to shareholders 1) Equity-based programmes 2) Change in holding of own shares Other changes |
724 | –11,935 –333 –62 –724 |
–11,935 –333 –62 |
||||
| CLOSINGBALANCE | 21,942 | 13,425 | 580 | 1,193 | –295 | 67,917 | 104,762 |
| 2016 | |||||||
| Opening balance Net profit Other comprehensive income (net oftax) |
21,942 | 12,260 | 328 1,130 |
3,211 –811 |
–312 25 |
60,351 14,378 |
97,780 14,378 344 |
| Total comprehensive income | 1,130 | –811 | 25 | 14,378 | 14,722 | ||
| Dividend to shareholders 1) Equity-based programmes 2) Change in holding of own shares Other changes |
441 | –11,504 342 34 –441 |
–11,504 342 34 |
1)Dividend paid in 2017 for 2016 was SEK 5.50 (5.25) per ClassAshare and SEK 5.50 (5.25) per Class C share. Proposed dividend for 2017 is SEK 5.75. Furtherinformation can be found in the chapter Shareholders and the SEB share on page 29–31.Dividend to shareholders is reported excluding dividend on own shares.
CLOSINGBALANCE 21,942 12,701 1,458 2,400 –287 63,160 101,374
2)As of 31December 2015 SEB owned 0.9 million ClassAshares forthe long-term incentive programmes. In 2016 5.5 million ClassAshares were been sold as stock options were exercised.During 2016, SEB also repurchased 29.8 million ClassAshares.As of 31December 2016 SEB owned 25.2 million ClassAshares with a market value of SEK 2,406m. Another 5.0 million ClassAshares have been sold during 2017 as stock options were exercised. During 2017, SEB repurchased 7.0 million ClassAshares.As of 31December 2017 SEB owned 27.1 million ClassAshares with a market value of SEK 2,612m.
3) 2,170,019,294 ClassAshares (2,170,019,294); 24,152,508 Class C shares (24,152,508).
4) The opening balance is equivalenttoDistributable items according to Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR).
Cash flow statement
Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken
| SEKm | 2017 | 2016 | Change, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interestreceived | 30,730 | 29,464 | 4 |
| Interest paid | –11,230 | –11,028 | 2 |
| Commission received | 12,516 | 11,884 | 5 |
| Commission paid | –2,965 | –3,064 | –3 |
| Netreceived from financialtransactions | 14,222 | –7,811 | |
| Otherincome | –1,423 | –3,634 | –61 |
| Paid expenses | –13,399 | –14,050 | –5 |
| Taxes paid | –2,355 | –3,531 | –33 |
| Cash flow from the profit and loss statement | 26,096 | –1,770 | |
| Increase (–)/decrease (+) in trading portfolios | –3,871 | 74,866 | |
| Increase (+)/decrease (–) in issued short-term securities | –54,279 | 33,673 | |
| Increase (–)/decrease (+) in lending to creditinstitutions | 102,644 | –122,367 | |
| Increase (–)/decrease (+) in lending to the public | –27,417 | –93,180 | –71 |
| Increase (+)/decrease (–) in liabilities to creditinstitutions | –41,358 | 34,094 | |
| Increase (+)/decrease (–) in deposits and borrowings from the public | 39,847 | 92,301 | –57 |
| Change in other assets | 2,144 | –5,987 | |
| Change in otherliabilities | 8,733 | –5,924 | |
| Cash flow from operating activities | 52,540 | 5,706 | |
| Dividends received | 6,981 | 6,581 | 6 |
| Investments/divestments in shares and bonds | 594 | 2,079 | –71 |
| Investments in intangible and tangible assets | –1,482 | –742 | 100 |
| Cash flow from investment activities | 6,094 | 7,918 | –23 |
| Issue of subordinated loans | 17,682 | –100 | |
| Repayment of subordinated loans | –7,169 | –9,196 | –22 |
| Dividend paid | –11,935 | –11,504 | 4 |
| Cash flow from financing activities | –19,104 | –3,018 | |
| NET CHANGE IN CASHANDCASHEQUIVALENTS | 39,530 | 10,606 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 91,932 | 77,493 | 19 |
| Exchange rate differences on cash and cash equivalents | –5,174 | 3,833 | |
| Netincrease in cash and cash equivalents | 39,530 | 10,606 | |
| CASHANDCASHEQUIVALENTSAT ENDOF PERIOD1) | 126,287 | 91,932 | 37 |
1) Cash and cash equivalents are disclosed in note 18.
Reconciliation ofliabilities from financing activities
| Opening balan ce | 40,719 | 31,372 | 30 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash flows | –7,169 | 8,486 | |
| Non-cash flow, currency exchange | –327 | 1,156 | |
| Non-cash flow,fair value changes | –600 | –335 | 79 |
| Non-cash flow, interest accruals | –233 | 40 | |
| TOTAL LIABILITIES FROM FINANCINGACTIVITIES | 32,390 | 40,719 | –20 |
Notes to the financial statements
SEKm, unless otherwise stated.
Corporate information
The SEB Group provides corporate,retail, investment and private banking services. The Group also provides asset management and life insurance services.
Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (publ.) is the parent company ofthe Group. The parent company is a Swedish limited liability company with its registered office in Stockholm, Sweden.
The parent company is included in the Large Cap segment ofthe NASDAQ Stockholm stock exchange.
The consolidated accounts forthe financial year 2017 were approved for publication by the Board of Directors on 20 February and will be presented for adoption atthe 2018 Annual General Meeting.
Exchange rates used for converting main currencies in theGroup Consolidation
| Income statement | Balance sheet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2016 | Change, % | 2017 | 2016 | Change, % | |
| DKK | 1.295 | 1.272 | 2 | 1.319 | 1.286 | 3 |
| EUR | 9.633 | 9.470 | 2 | 9.822 | 9.558 | 3 |
| NOK | 1.033 | 1.020 | 1 | 1.000 | 1.051 | –5 |
| USD | 8.538 | 8.561 | 0 | 8.190 | 9.054 | –10 |
1 Accounting policies
Significant accounting policies forthe Group
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
The Group's consolidated accounts have been prepared in accordance with the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and interpretations of these standards as adopted by the EU. The accounting also follows the Annual Accounts Actfor CreditInstitutions and Securities Companies (1995:1559) and the regulation and general guidelines issued by the Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority, Annual Reports in CreditInstitutions and Securities Companies (FFFS 2008:25). In addition to this the Supplementary Accounting Rules for Groups RFR 1 and the additional UFR statements issued by the Swedish Financial Reporting Board have been applied.
BASIS OF PREPARATION
The consolidated accounts are based on amortised cost, exceptforthe fair value measurement of available-for-sale financial assets,financial assets and liabilities measured atfair value through profit orloss including deriva tives and investment properties measured atfair value. The carrying amount offinancial assets and liabilities subjectto hedge accounting atfair value has been adjusted for changes in fair value attributable to the hedged risk. The financial statements are presented in million Swedish kronor (SEKm) unless indicated otherwise.
CONSOLIDATION
Subsidiaries
The consolidated accounts combine the financial statements ofthe parent company and its subsidiaries. Subsidiaries are companies, over which the Group has control. The Group controls an entity when it has power over an investee, is exposed to, or has rights to, variable returns from its involvement and has the ability to use its powerto affectthe amount ofthe returns. Con trol is deemed to exist when the parent company holds, directly orindirectly, more than 50 per cent ofthe voting rights, unless there is evidence that anotherinvestor has the practical ability to unilaterally directthe relevant activities ofthe entity. Companies in which the parent company orits subsidi aries hold more than 50 per cent ofthe votes, but are unable to exercise control due to contractual orlegalreasons, are notincluded in the consolidated accounts. The Group also assesses if control exists when it holds less than 50 per cent ofthe voting rights. This may arise ifthe Group has contractual arrangements with other vote holders. The size and dispersion of holdings of other vote holders may also indicate thatthe Group has the practical ability to directthe relevant activities ofthe investee.
When voting rights are notrelevantin deciding who has power over an
entity, such as interests in some funds or special purpose entities (SPE), all facts and circumstances are considered in determining ifthe Group controls the entity. In the assessment whetherto consolidate SPEs and any entities where there is notimmediately clear where controlrests, an analysis is made to identify which party has power overthe activities which most affects the returns ofthe entity and ifthat party is significantly exposed or have signifi cantrights to the returns from that entity.
The financial statements ofthe parent company and the consolidated sub sidiaries referto the same period and have been drawn up according to the accounting policies applicable to the Group. A subsidiary is included in the consolidated accounts from the time of acquisition, being the date when the parent company gains control overthe subsidiary. The subsidiary is included in the consolidated accounts untilthe date when control overthe company ceases to exist.
The consolidated accounts are prepared in accordance with the acquisition method. The acquisition value is measured as the fair value ofthe assets given, equity instruments issued and liabilities incurred or assumed.
The identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities and contingentliabilities assumed in a business combination are measured initially attheirfair values on acquisition date, irrespective of any minority interest. The excess ofthe consideration transferred forthe acquisition overthe fair value ofthe Group's share ofthe identifiable acquired net assets is recorded as goodwill. Ifthe consideration transferred is less than the fair value ofthe net assets ofthe acquired subsidiary,the difference is recognised directly against profit orloss.
Goodwill is allocated between the cash-generating units or groups of units which are expected to generate cash flows. The cash-generating units to which goodwill is allocated correspond to the lowestlevel within the Group in which goodwill is monitored forinternal management purposes.
Intra-group transactions, balances and unrealised gains and losses on transactions between Group companies are eliminated. The minority interest ofthe profitin subsidiaries is included in the reported profitin the consolidated income statement, while the minority share of net assets is included in equity.
Associated companies
The consolidated accounts also include associated companies that are com panies in which the Group has significantinfluence, but not control. Significant influence means thatthe Group can participate in the financial and operating policy decisions ofthe company, whilst not determining or controlling such financial and operating policies. A significantinfluence is generally deemed to existifthe Group, directly orindirectly, holds between 20 and 50 per cent ofthe voting rights of an entity.
According to the main principle, associated companies are consolidated
in accordance with the equity method. This means thatthe holding is initially reported atits acquisition cost. Associated companies are subsequently car ried at a value that corresponds to the Group's share ofthe net assets. How ever,the Group has chosen to designate investments in associates held by the Group's venture capital organisation atfair value through profit orloss on the basis thatthese are managed and evaluated based on fair value.
ASSETS HELD FOR SALE
Assets (or disposal groups) are classified as held for sale atthe time when a non-current asset or group of assets (disposal group) are available forimmediate sale in its present condition and its sale is deemed to be highly probable. Atthe time ofthe classification, a valuation ofthe asset or disposal group is made atthe lower ofits carrying amount and fair value, less costs to sell. Any subsequentimpairmentlosses orrevaluations are recognised directly in profit orloss. No gains are recognised in excess of accumulated impairment losses ofthe assetrecognised previously. From the time of classification, no depreciation is made for property and equipment orintangible assets originating from assets held for sale. Assets and liabilities held for sale are reported separately in the balance sheet untilthey are sold.
SEGMENT REPORTING
An operating segmentis identified on the basis ofinternalreports about com ponents ofthe Group that are regularly reviewed by the chief operating deci sion makerin orderto allocate resources to the segments and to assess their performance. The business divisions are identified as separate operating seg ments. Business Support, Group Staff, Group Treasury and Group wide items are included in the segment Other. In the context of defining the segments the President and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) is the Group's chief operating decision maker.
FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION
Foreign currency transactions are translated into the appropriate functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing atthe dates ofthe transactions. On subsequent balance sheet dates monetary items in foreign currency are translated using the closing rate. Non-monetary items, which are measured in terms of historical costin foreign currency, are translated using the exchange rate on the date ofthe transaction. Non-monetary items, which are measured atfair value in a foreign currency, are translated applying the exchange rate on the date on which the fair value is determined.
Gains and losses arising as a result of exchange rate differences on settlement ortranslation of monetary items are recognised in profit orloss. Trans lation differences on non-monetary items, classified as financial assets or financial liabilities atfair value through profit orloss, are included in the change in fair value ofthose items. Translation differences from non-monetary items, classified as available-for-sale financial assets, are recognised in other comprehensive income. Exchange rate differences referring to monetary items comprising part of a netinvestmentin a foreign operation are reported in other comprehensive income.
The income statements and balance sheets of Group entities, with a functional currency otherthan the Group's presentation currency, are translated to SEK in the consolidated accounts. Assets and liabilities in foreign Group entities are translated atthe closing rate and income and expenses in the income statement are translated atthe average exchange rate forthe year. The exchange rate differences are recognised as a separate component of other comprehensive income.
Goodwill arising in conjunction with acquisitions offoreign Group entities, as well as adjustments to the fair value of assets and liabilities made in con junction with acquisitions are included in the assets and liabilities ofthe for eign entity in question and are translated atthe closing rate.
FINANCIAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
Financial assets
Financial assets are recognised on the balance sheet when the Group becomes a party to the contractual provisions ofthe instrument and are measured atfair value on initialrecognition. Transaction costs are included in the fair value on initialrecognition exceptforfinancial assets atfair value through profit orloss where transaction costs are expensed in profit orloss. Financial assets are derecognised when the rights to receive cash flows have expired orthe Group has transferred substantially allrisks and rewards. Transfers offinancial assets with retention of all or substantially allrisks and rewards include for example repurchase transactions and securities lending transactions.
The Group classifies its financial assets in the following categories:financial instruments atfair value through profit orloss; loans and receivables and available-for-sale financial assets.
Financial assets are recognised on the balance sheet on the trade date, with exception ofloans and receivables, which are recognised on the settlement date.
Financial assets at fair value through profit and loss
Financial assets atfair value through profit orloss consist offinancial assets classified as held fortrading and financial assets which, upon initialrecognition, have been designated atfair value through profit orloss (fair value option). Financial assets are classified as held fortrading ifthey are held with the intention to be sold in the short-term and forthe purpose of generating profits. Derivatives are classified as held fortrading unless designated as hedging instruments.
The fair value option can be applied to contracts including one or more embedded derivatives, investments that are managed and evaluated on a fair value basis and situations in which such designation reduces measurement inconsistencies. The nature ofthe financial assets which have been desig nated atfair value through profit orloss and the criteria for such designation are described in the relevant notes to the financial statements.
Loans and receivables
Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or deter minable payments that are not quoted in an active market. Loans and receiva bles are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method. The balance sheetitems Cash balances with central banks, Loans to creditinstitu tions and Loans to the public are included in this category.
Available-for-sale financial assets
Available-for-sale financial assets are non-derivative financial assets that are designated as available-for-sale and are not classified into any ofthe other categories described above. Available-for-sale financial assets are measured atfair value. Gains and losses arising from changes in fair value are reported in other comprehensive income and accumulated in equity. In the case of sale or impairment of an available-for-sale financial asset,the accumulated gains or losses previously reported in equity are recognised in profit orloss. Interest on interest-bearing available-for-sale financial assets is recognised in profit or loss, applying the effective interest method. Dividends on equity instruments, classified as available-for-sale, are also recognised in profit orloss.
Investments in equity instruments without a quoted market price in an active market are measured, if possible, atfair value on the basis of a recog nised valuation method. Investments in equity instruments without a quoted market price in an active market and whose fair value cannot be reliably measured are measured at cost.
Financial liabilities
Financial liabilities are measured atfair value on initialrecognition. In the case offinancial liabilities measured atfair value through profit orloss,transaction costs directly attributable to the acquisition orthe issuance ofthe financial liability are recognised in profit orloss. For otherfinancial liabilities direct transaction cost are recognised as a deduction from the fair value.
Financial liabilities are derecognised when extinguished,thatis, when the obligation is discharged, cancelled or expired.
Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss
Financial liabilities atfair value through profit orloss are either classified as held fortrading or designated as fair value through profit orloss on initialrec ognition (fair value option). The criteria for classification offinancial liabilities underthe fair value option are the same as forfinancial assets. Liabilities to policyholders and some Debt securities are included in this category. Financial liabilities held fortrading are primarily short positions in interest-bearing securities, equities and derivatives not designated as hedging instruments.
Other financial liabilities
The category otherfinancial liabilities primarily include the Group's shortterm and long-term borrowings. Afterinitialrecognition otherfinancial liabili ties are measured at amortised cost, using the effective interest method. The balance sheetitems Deposits from creditinstitutions, Deposits and borrow ings from the public and Debt securities are included in this category.
Offsetting financial transactions
Financial assets and liabilities are offset and the net amountreported in the balance sheet when there is a legalrightto offsettransactions and an inten tion to settle net orrealise the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.
Embedded derivatives
Some combined contracts contain both a derivative and a non-derivative component. In such cases,the derivative componentis termed an embedded derivative. Where the economic characteristics and risks ofthe embedded derivatives are not closely related to those ofthe host contract, and the host contractitselfis not carried atfair value through profit orloss,the embedded derivative is bifurcated and reported atfair value with gains and losses being recognised in the income statement.
Certain combined instruments are classified as financial assets orfinancial liabilities atfair value through profit orloss according to the fair value option. The designation implies thatthe entire combined instrumentis measured at fair value through profit and loss.
Repurchase agreements
Securities may be lent or sold subjectto a commitmentto repurchase them
(a 'repo') at a fixed price and at a predetermined date. Such securities are retained on the balance sheet and in addition included separately as collateral pledged for own liabilities when cash consideration is received. Depend ing on the counterparty, paymentreceived is recognised under Deposits by creditinstitutions or as Deposits and borrowing from the public.
Similarly, where the Group borrows or purchases securities subjectto a commitmentto resellthem (a 'reverse repo'),the securities are notincluded in the balance sheet. Payments made are recognised as Loans to creditinsti tutions or as Loans to the public.
The difference between sale and repurchase price is accrued overthe life ofthe agreements using the effective interest method.
Securities borrowing and lending
Securities borrowing and lending transactions are entered into on a collateralised basis. Fair values of securities received or delivered are monitored on a daily basis to require or provide additional collateral. Cash collateral deliv ered is derecognised from the balance sheet and a corresponding receivable is recognised. Cash collateralreceived is recognised in the balance sheet and a corresponding obligation to return it, is recognised. Securities lentremain on the balance sheet and are in addition reported as pledged assets. Borrowed securities are notrecognised as assets. When borrowed securities are sold (short position), an amount corresponding to the fair value ofthe securities is booked as a liability. Securities received in a borrowing orlending transaction are disclosed as obligations.
Fair value measurement
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly market between market participants atthe measurement date.
The fair value offinancial instruments quoted in an active marketis based on quoted market prices. Ifthe asset orliability measured atfair value has a bid price and an ask price,the price within the bid-ask spread thatis most representative offair value in the circumstances is used.
The fair value offinancial instruments that are not quoted in an active mar ketis determined by applying various valuation techniques with maximum use of observable inputs. The valuation techniques used are for example discounted cash flows, option pricing models, valuations with reference to recenttransactions in the same instrument and valuations with reference to otherfinancial instruments that are substantially the same. When valuing financial liabilities atfair value own credit standing is reflected.
Any differences between the transaction price and the fair value calcu lated using a valuation technique with unobservable inputs,the Day 1 profit, is amortised overthe life ofthe transaction. Day 1 profitis then recognised in profit orloss either when realised through settlement or when inputs used to calculate fair value are based on observable prices orrates.
Fair value is generally measured forindividualfinancial instruments. In addition portfolio adjustments are made to cover marketrisks and the credit risk of each ofthe counterparties on groups offinancial assets and liabilities on the basis ofthe net exposure to these risks. When assets and liabilities have offsetting marketrisks mid-market prices are used for establishing fair value ofthe risk positions that offset each other. To reflect counterparty risk and own creditrisk in OTC derivatives, adjustments are made based on the net exposure towards each counterpart.
Hedge accounting
Derivatives are used to hedge interestrate, exchange rate and equity exposures. Where derivatives are held forrisk management purposes and when transactions meetthe required criteria,the Group applies fair value hedge accounting, cash flow hedge accounting or hedging of a netinvestmentin a foreign operation as appropriate to the risks being hedged. The Group documents and designates, atinception,the relationship between the hedged item and the hedging instrument as well as the risk objective and hedge strategy. The Group also documents its assessment, both atinception and on an ongoing basis, whetherthe derivatives used are both prospectively, and retrospec tively highly effective in offsetting the hedged risk. As part ofthe prospective testthe Group also assesses and documents thatthe likelihood offorecasted transactions to take place is highly probable.More information regarding hedge accounting can be found in note 7Net otherincome.
Hedge accounting is applied when derivatives are used to reduce risks such as interestrate risks and currency risks in financial instruments. Furthermore, hedge accounting can be applied to liabilities hedging currency risk in net investments in subsidiaries. The Group applies different hedge accounting models depending on the purpose ofthe hedge:
– Hedges offair value ofrecognised assets orliabilities (fair value hedge)
- Hedges ofthe fair value ofthe interestrate risk of a portfolio (portfolio hedge)
- Hedges of highly probable future cash flows attributable to recognised assets orliabilities (cash flow hedge)
- Hedges of a netinvestmentin a foreign operation (netinvestment hedge).
- The Group discontinues hedge accounting when:
- The derivative has ceased to be highly effective as a hedging instrument;
- The derivative expires, is sold,terminated, or exercised;
- The hedged item matures, is sold orrepaid; or
- The forecasttransaction is no longer deemed highly probable.
Fair value hedge
Fair value hedges are used to protecttheGroup against undesirable exposures to changes in the market prices ofrecognised assets orliabilities. Changes in fair value of derivatives that qualify and are designated as hedging instruments are recorded in the income statement,together with changes in the fair value ofthe hedged asset orliability that are attributable to the hedged risk as Net otherincome.
Where the Group hedges the fair value ofinterestrate exposure in a portfolio including financial assets orfinancial liabilities, so called portfolio hedging ofinterestrate risk,the gains orlosses attributable to the hedged item are reported as a separate item under assets or as a separate item underliabili ties in the balance sheet.
When hedge relationships are discontinued, any adjustmentto the carrying amount ofthe hedged item is amortised to profit orloss overthe period to maturity ofthe hedged item.
Cash flow hedge
Cash flow hedging is applied forthe hedging of exposure to variations in future interest payments on assets orliabilities with variable interestrates. The portion ofthe gain orloss on the hedging instrumentthatis determined to be an effective hedge is recognised in other comprehensive income. The ineffective portion ofthe gain orloss on the hedging instrumentis recognised in profit orloss as Net otherincome.
Gains orlosses on hedging instruments that have been accumulated in equity are recognised in profit orloss in the same period as interestincome and interest expense from the hedged asset orliability.
When cash flow hedges are discontinued butfuture cash flows still are expected to occur, accumulated gains orlosses from the hedging instrument willremain as a separate item in equity untilthe hedged future cash flows occur. Accumulated gains orlosses are subsequently reported in profit or loss in Netinterestincome in the same period in which the previously hedged interestflows are recognised in profit orloss.
Net investment hedge
Hedge of a netinvestmentis applied to protectthe Group from translation differences due to netinvestments in foreign subsidiaries. Foreign currency loans constitute the major portion of hedging instruments in these transac tions. The translation differences arising on the hedging instruments are rec ognised in other comprehensive income and accumulated in equity as transla tion offoreign operations,to the extentthe hedge is effective. Any ineffective partis recognised as Netfinancial income. When a foreign operation is par tially disposed of or sold, exchange differences accumulated in equity are recognised in the income statement as part ofthe gain orloss on the sale.
OPERATING INCOME
Interest income and interest expense
The effective interest method is applied to recognise interestincome and interest expenses in profit orloss forfinancial assets and financial liabilities measured at amortised cost.
The effective interest method is a method of calculating the amortised cost of a financial asset or a financial liability and of allocating interestincome and interest expenses. The effective interestrate is the rate that discounts estimated future cash payments orreceipts through the expected life ofthe financial instrumentto the net carrying amount ofthe financial instrument. When calculating future payments, all payments included in the terms and conditions ofthe contracts, such as advance payments, are taken into consideration. However,future creditlosses are nottaken into account. The calculation of the effective interestrate includes fees and points to be received and paid that are an integral part ofthe effective interestrate.
Once a financial asset or a group of similarfinancial assets has been written down as a result of an impairmentloss, interestincome is subsequently recognised applying the rate ofinterest used to discountthe future cash flows forthe purpose of measuring the impairmentloss.
Fee and commission income
Commission income and income in the form offees on financial instruments are accounted forin different ways, depending upon the financial instrument from which the income is derived. When commission income and fees are included in the calculation ofthe effective interestrate of a financial instrument measured at amortised cost, such interest and fees are allocated over the expected tenor ofthe instrument applying the effective interest method and presented in Netinterestincome.
Commission income and fees from asset management and advisory ser vices are reported in accordance with the economic substance of each agree ment. This income is recognised during the period in which the service is provided. Commission and fees from negotiating a transaction for a third party, such as arrangement of acquisitions or purchase or sale of a business, is recognised on completion ofthe transaction. Performance-based fees are reported when the income can be reliably calculated.
Fees from loan syndications in which SEB acts as arranger are reported as income fee when the syndication is completed and the Group has retained no part ofthe loan orretained a part ofthe loan atthe same effective interest rate as other participants.
Expenses that are directly related to the generation offee and commission income are recognised as fee and commission expense.
Net financial income
Gains and losses arising from changes in fair value offinancial assets and lia bilities measured atfair value through profit orloss are reported in the income statement on an ongoing basis underthe item Netfinancial income.
Dividend income
Dividends are recognised when the entity's rightto receive paymentis established.
IMPAIRMENT OF FINANCIAL ASSETS
Allfinancial assets, exceptthose classified atfair value through profit orloss, are tested forimpairment.
At each balance sheet date the Group assesses whetherthere is objective evidence thatfinancial assets not carried atfair value through profit orloss are impaired. A financial asset or a group offinancial assets are impaired and impairmentlosses are incurred ifthere is objective evidence ofimpairment as a result of one or more events occurring afterthe initialrecognition ofthe asset, and ifthatloss event will have an impact on the estimated future cash flows ofthe financial asset or a group offinancial assets that can be reliably measured.
Examples of objective evidence that one or more events have occurred which may affect estimated future cash flows include:
- significantfinancial difficulty ofthe issuer or obligor,
- concession granted to the borrower as a consequence offinancial difficulty, which normally would not have been granted to the borrower,
- a breach of contract, such as a default or delinquency in the payment of interest or principal,
- the probability thatthe borrower will go bankrupt or undergo some other kind offinancialreconstruction
- deterioration in the value of collateral and
- a significant or prolonged decline in the fair value of an equity instrument below its cost
An impairmentloss is reported as a write off, ifitis deemed impossible to col lectthe contractual amounts that have not been paid and/or are expected to remain unpaid, orifitis deemed impossible to recoverthe acquisition cost by selling any collateral provided. In other cases, a specific provision is recorded in an allowance account. As soon as the non-collectible amount can be deter mined and the assetis written off,the amountreported in the allowance accountis dissolved. Similarly,the provision in the allowance accountis reversed ifthe estimated recovery value exceeds the carrying amount.
Assessment of impairment
Individual assessment of impairment
Loss events indicating objective evidence ofimpairment ofindividually assessed assets are when scheduled payments are past due by more than 90 days, orifthe counterparty is expected to be in default or any other com bination of events that are deemed so negative thatthere will be a probable payment defaultin the foreseeable future. The debtinstrumentis impaired if the cash flows including the value ofthe collateral does not cover outstanding exposure.
Collective assessment of impairment when assets are not individually impaired Assets assessed forimpairment on an individual basis and found notimpaired are included in a collective assessed, ofincurred but notidentified, impairment. The collective assessment ofincurred but notidentified creditlosses is based on the SEB counterpartrating scale.
Loans assessed on a portfolio basis
Loans with limited value and similarrisk, homogenous groups, are assessed forimpairment on a portfolio basis. In assessing collective impairmentthe Group uses statistical models based on the probability of default and the amount ofloss incurred, considering collaterals and recovery rates. The out come is adjusted for management's judgement as to whether current eco nomic and credit conditions are such thatthe actual losses are likely to be greater orless than suggested by the models. Defaultrates and loss rates are regularly benchmarked against actual outcomes to ensure thatthey remain appropriate.
Recognition of impairment loss on assets carried at amortised cost
An impairment of an individually assessed financial assetin the category loans and receivables carried at amortised costis calculated on the basis of the original effective interestrate ofthe financial instrument. The amount of the impairmentis measured as the difference between the carrying amount ofthe asset and the present value of estimated future cash flows (recovera ble amount). Ifthe terms of an asset are restructured or otherwise modified due to financial difficulties on behalf ofthe borrower orissuer, impairmentis measured using the original effective interestrate before modification ofthe terms and conditions. Cash flows relating to short-term receivables are not discounted ifthe effect ofthe discounting is immaterial. The entire outstand ing amount of each loan for which a specific provision has been established is included in impaired loans, i.e. including the portion covered by collateral.
Recognition of impairment loss on Available-for-sale financial assets
When there is a decline in the fair value and there is objective evidence of impairmentin an available-for-sale financial instrument,the accumulated loss shall be reclassified from equity to profit orloss. Equity instruments are con sidered impaired when a significant or prolonged decline in the fair value has occurred. The amount ofthe accumulated loss thatis transferred from equity and recognised in profit orloss is equalto the difference between the acquisition cost and the currentfair value, with a deduction of any impairmentlosses on thatfinancial asset which had been previously recognised in profit orloss.
The incurred impairment of unquoted equities, measured at acquisition cost, is calculated as the difference between the carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows, discounted atthe current mar ketrate ofreturn for similar equities.
Impairmentlosses on bonds or otherinterest-bearing instruments classi fied as available-for-sale are reversed via profit orloss ifthe increase in fair value can be objectively attributed to an eventtaking place subsequentto the write-down. Impairmentlosses for equity instruments classified as availablefor-sale are notreversed through profit orloss following an increase in fair value but are recognised in other comprehensive income.
Restructured loans
Portfolio assessed loans that would have been considered past due more than 60 days ifthey were notrestructured.
SEIZED ASSETS
Seized assets are assets taken overto protect a claim. SEB may refrain from a loan receivable and instead seize the assetthat served as collateralforthe loan. Seized assets may consist offinancial assets, properties and othertan gible assets. Seized asset are recognised on the same line item in the balance sheet as similar assets that have been acquired otherwise. Seized financial assets are categorised as Available-for-sale financial assets. Atinception seized assets are measured atfair value. The fair value atinitialrecognition becomes the acquisition value. Subsequently seized assets are measured according to type of asset with the exception ofimpairment on tangible seized assets that is reported as Gains less losses from tangible and intangible assets ratherthan as Depreciation, amortisation and impairment oftangible and intangible assets. The purpose is to betterreflectthe similar character of impairment of assets that are taken overto protect claims on counterparties and creditlosses.
TANGIBLE ASSETS
Tangible assets, with the exception ofinvestment properties held in insurance operations, are measured at cost and are depreciated according to plan on a straightline basis overthe estimated useful life ofthe asset. The maximum depreciation period for buildings is 50 years. The depreciation period for othertangible assets is between 3 and 8 years.
Tangible assets are tested forimpairment wheneverthere is an indication ofimpairment.
LEASING
A finance lease is a lease thattransfers,from the lessorto the lessee, sub stantially allrisks and rewards incidentalto the ownership of an asset. In the Group, essentially all leasing contracts in which the Group is the lessor are classified as finance leases. Finance leases are reported as lending, which implies thatthe leasing income is reported within netinterestincome.
INVESTMENT PROPERTIES
Investments in properties held in orderto receive rental income and/orfor capital appreciation are reported as investment properties. The recognition and measurement of such properties differs, depending upon the entity own ing the property. Investment properties held in the insurance operations, used to match liabilities providing a yield directly associated with the fair values of specified assets, including the investment properties themselves, are accounted for using the fair value model. Holdings ofinvestment properties in the banking operations are measured at depreciated cost.
INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Intangible assets are identifiable, non-monetary assets without physical substance. For an intangible assetto be recognised an entity must be able to demonstrate control ofthe intangible asset, which implies thatthe entity has the ability to ensure thatthe future economic benefits flowing from the under lying resource will accrue to the company. Intangible assets, otherthan good will, are only recognised in the balance sheetifitis probable thatthe future economic benefits attributable to the asset will accrue to the Group and ifthe acquisition cost ofthe asset can be measured in a reliable manner.
Intangible assets are measured initially at acquisition cost, and thereafter at costless any accumulated amortisation and any accumulated impairment losses.
Intangible assets with finite useful lives, i.e. all intangible assets except goodwill, are amortised on a straightline basis overtheir useful lives and tested forimpairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate thatthe carrying amount may not be recoverable. Internally generated intangible assets, such as software development, are amortised over a period of between 3 and 8 years.
Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives, i.e. goodwill, are not amortised buttested forimpairment annually and wheneverthere is an indication that the intangible asset may be impaired. As regards goodwill, an impairmentloss is recognised in profit orloss wheneverthe carrying amount, with respectto a cash-generating unit or a group of cash-generating units to which the goodwill is attributed, exceeds the recoverable amount. Impairmentlosses attributa ble to goodwill are notreversed,regardless of whetherthe cause ofthe impairment has ceased to exist.
The recoverable amount of an intangible asset is determined if there is indication of a reduction in the value ofthe asset. An impairmentloss is recog nised ifthe carrying amount exceeds the recoverable amount ofthe asset.
PROVISIONS
Provisions are recognised for present obligations arising as consequences of past events where itis more likely than notthat a transfer of economic benefit will be necessary to settle the obligation, and it can be reliably estimated. Provisions are determined by discounting the expected future cash flows at pre tax rate thatreflects current market assessments ofthe time value of money and, where appropriate,the risks specific to the liability.
Provisions are made for undrawn loan commitments and similarfacilities if itis probable thatthe facility will be drawn by a debtorin financial difficulties.
Provisions are evaluated at each balance sheet date and are adjusted as necessary.
FINANCIAL GUARANTEES
Financial guarantees are contracts thatrequire the Group to make specified payments to reimburse the holderfor a loss itincurs because a specified debtorfails to make payment when due in accordance with the terms of a debtinstrument. Financial guarantee liabilities are initially recognised attheir fair value, which most often equals the premium received. The initialfair value is amortised overthe life ofthe financial guarantee. The guarantee liability is subsequently carried atthe higher ofthis amortised amount and the best esti mate ofthe expenditure required to settle any financial obligation arising as a result ofthe guarantee atthe balance sheet date. Provisions and changes in provisions are recognised in the income statement as Net creditlosses. The contractual amounts according to financial guarantees are notrecognised in the balance sheet but disclosed as obligations.
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
Pensions
There are both defined contribution and defined benefit pension plans within the Group, of which most have plan assets. A defined benefit plan is a pension plan that defines an amount of pension benefitthat an employee will get on retirement depending on factors such as age, years of service and compensa tion. A defined contribution plan is a pension plan where the Group pays a contribution to separate entities and has no further obligation once the contribution is paid.
The pension commitments ofthe Group with respectto defined benefit plans are covered by the pension funds ofthe Group orthrough insurance solutions.
The defined benefit obligation is calculated quarterly by independent actuaries using the Projected Unit Credit Method. The assumptions upon which the calculations are based are found in note 9b addressing Staff costs.
All changes in the net defined benefitliability (asset) are recognised as they occur, as follows: (i) service cost and netinterestin the income state ment; and (ii) remeasurements of both defined benefit obligations and plan assets in other comprehensive income.
Pension costs for defined contribution pension plans are recognised as an expense during the period the employees carry outthe service to which the paymentrelates.
Share-based payments
The Group operates a number of share-based incentive programmes, under
which it awards SEB equity instruments to its employees. Equity-settled share-based incentive programmes entitle employees to receive SEB equity instruments. Cash-settled share-based incentive programmes entitle employees to receive cash based on the price or value of equity instruments of SEB. Fair value ofthese rights is determined by using appropriate valuation models,taking into accountthe terms and conditions ofthe award and the Group's estimate ofthe number ofrights that will eventually vest, which is reassessed at each reporting date. Social security costs are accounted for overthe vesting period and the provision for social security costs is reassessed on each reporting date to ensure thatthe provision is based on the rights'fair value atthe reporting date.
The cost of equity-settled share-based incentive programmes is measured by reference to the fair value of equity instruments on the date they are granted and recognised as an expense on a straight-line basis overthe vesting period with a corresponding increase in equity. The vesting period is the period thatthe employees have to remain in service in SEB in orderfortheir rights to vest. For cash-settled share-based incentive programmes,the ser vices acquired and liability incurred are measured atthe fair value ofthe lia bility and recognised as an expense overthe vesting period, during which the employees render service. Until settlement,the fair value ofthe liability is remeasured, with changes in fair value recognised in the income statement.
TAXES
The Group's tax forthe period consists of current and deferred tax. Current tax assets and liabilities forthe current and prior periods are measured atthe amount expected to be paid to orfrom tax authorities using the tax rates and tax laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted atthe balance sheet date. Currenttax is calculated based on the taxable results forthe period. Deferred tax arises due to temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts.
Currenttax and deferred tax are generally recognised in profit orloss. However,tax thatrelates to items recognised in other comprehensive income is also reported directly in other comprehensive income. Examples of such items are changes in the fair value of available-for-sale financial assets and gains orlosses on hedging instruments in cash flow hedges.
Deferred tax assets are recognised in the balance sheetto the extentthat itis probable thatfuture taxable profits will be available against which they can be utilized. The Group's deferred tax assets and tax liabilities have been calculated atthe tax rate of 22 per cent (22 per cent) in Sweden and at each respective country's tax rate forforeign companies.
INSURANCE AND INVESTMENT CONTRACTS
Insurance contracts are contracts under which the Group accepts significant insurance risk – defined as a transfer of an absolute risk of minimum 5 per cent ofthe underlying value – from the policyholder by agreeing to compensate the policyholder or other beneficiaries on the occurrence of a defined insured event. Investment contracts are financial instruments that do not meetthe definition of an insurance contract, as they do nottransfer significantinsurance risk from the policyholderto the Group.
Insurance contracts
Insurance contracts are classified as short-term (non-life) orlong-term (life). Short-term insurance comprise sickness, disability, health-care, and rehabili tation insurance. Long-term insurance comprises mainly traditional life insur ance. In the Group accounts short-term and long-term insurance are pre sented aggregated as Insurance contracts.
Measurement of short-term insurance contracts (non-life)
The provision for unearned premiums is intended to coverthe anticipated cost of claims and operating expenses arising during the remaining policy period ofthe insurance contracts in force. The provision for unearned premiums is usually strictly proportional overthe period ofthe insurance contracts. If premiums are judged to be insufficientto coverthe anticipated costfor claims and operating expenses,the provision for unearned premiums is strengthened with a provision for unexpired risks.
For anticipated future claims that have been incurred but not yet paid, pro vision for claims outstanding is recognised. The provision is intended to cover the anticipated future payment of all claims incurred, including claims incurred but notreported (IBNR provisions). This provision should also cover all costs for claims settlement. The provision for claims outstanding is not dis counted, with the exception of provisions for sickness annuities, which are discounted using standard actuarial methods.
Measurement of long-term insurance contracts (life)
Forlong-term life insurance contracts, a liability for contractual benefits that are expected to be incurred in the future is recorded when the premiums are recognised. The liability equals the sum ofthe discounted value of expected benefit payments and future administration expenses, less any outstanding future contractual premium payments. Liabilities forlong-term life insurance are discounted using standard actuarial methods.
Liability adequacy test
Swedish actuarial procedures involve performing liability adequacy tests on insurance liabilities. This is to ensure thatthe carrying amount ofthe liabilities is sufficientin the light of estimated future cash flows. The carrying amount of a liability is the value ofthe liability itselfless any related intangible asset or assetfor deferred acquisition costs. The current best estimates offuture con tractual cash flows, as well as claims handling and administration costs, are used in performing these liability adequacy tests. These cash flows are dis counted and compared to the carrying amount ofthe liability. Any deficitis immediately recognised in profit orloss.
Revenue recognition
Premiums forinsurance contracts are recognised as revenue when they are paid by the policyholders. For contracts where insurance risk premiums received during a period are intended to coverinsurance claims arising in that period those premiums are recognised as revenue proportionally during the period of coverage.
Recognition of expenses
Costs forinsurance contracts are recognised as an expense when incurred, with the exception of commissions and other variable acquisition costs that vary with and are directly related to securing new contracts and the renewal of existing contracts. These costs are capitalised as deferred acquisition costs. These costs are mainly incremental acquisition costs paid to sales per sonnel, brokers and other distribution channels. Deferred acquisition costs are amortised as the related revenue is recognised. The assetis tested for impairment every accounting period, ensuring thatthe economic future benefits expected to arise from the contracts exceed its face amount. All other costs, such as non-incremental acquisition costs or maintenance costs, are recognised in the accounting period in which they arise. Insurance compensa tion is recorded as an expense when incurred.
Reinsurance
Contracts with re-insurers, whereby compensation forlosses is received by the Group, are classified as ceded reinsurance. For ceded reinsurance,the benefits to which the Group is entitled underthe terms ofthe reinsurance con tract are reported as the re-insurers' share ofinsurance provisions. Amounts recoverable from re-insurers are measured consistently with the amounts associated with the reinsurance contracts and in accordance with the terms of each reinsurance contract.
Investment contracts
The majority ofthe Group's unitlinked insurance is classified as investment contracts where no significantinsurance risk is transferred from the policyholderto the Group. A minor part ofthe Group's unitlinked insurance business is classified as insurance contracts.
Measurement
Investment contracts are financial commitments whose fair value is dependent on the fair value ofthe underlying financial assets. The underlying assets and related liabilities are designated atfair value through profit orloss (fair value option). The choice to use the fair value option has been made forthe purpose of eliminating the measurementinconsistency that would occurif different bases for measurement would have been used for assets and liabili ties. The fair value ofthe unitlinked financial liabilities is determined using the fair value ofthe financial assets linked to the financial liabilities attributed to the policyholder on the balance sheet date. However, ifthe liability is subject to a surrender option,the fair value ofthe financial liability is neverless than the amount payable on surrender.
Revenue recognition
Amounts received from and paid to policyholders are reported in the balance sheet as deposits or withdrawals. Fees charged for managing investment con tracts are recognised as revenue. The revenue forthese management services is evenly distributed overthe tenor ofthe contracts.
Recognition of expenses
Variable expenses directly attributable to securing a new investment contract are deferred. These costs are primarily variable acquisition costs paid to sales personnel, brokers and other distribution channels. Deferred acquisi tion costs are reported in profit orloss as the related revenue is recognised. The assetis tested forimpairment during each accounting period to ensure thatthe future economic benefits expected to arise from the contract exceed the carrying amount ofthe asset. All other costs, such as fixed acquisition costs or ongoing administration costs, are recognised in the accounting period in which they arise.
CONTRACTS WITH DISCRETIONARY PARTICIPATION FEATURES (DPF)
Some traditional pension saving contracts include a discretionary participa tion feature. This feature entitles the policyholderto receive, as a supplement to guaranteed benefits, additional benefits or bonuses. All contracts that include a discretionary participation feature are reported as insurance con tracts. The amounts referring to the guaranteed element and to the discretionary participation feature are reported as liabilities to policyholders.
CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING POLICIES IMPLEMENTED 2017
The following changes have been implemented in 2017: IAS 12 Income Taxes has been amended regarding recognition of deferred tax assets for unrealised losses. IAS 7 Statements of Cash flows has been amended with new disclosure requirements. Within the annual improvement cycle 2014–2016 the scope ofIFRS 12 Disclosures of interests in other entities has been clarified. The amendment ofIFRS 12 is not yet endorsed by the EU.
The Group changed the presentation ofthe income statementin the fourth quarter 2017 by adding a line, Items affecting comparability. The Group also added a line with the net of operating income and operating expenses, Operating profit before items affecting comparability. The purpose ofthe change is to simplify reporting and facilitate the comparison of operating profit between time periods. Items that management considers affectthe compara bility significantly or are relevantforthe understanding ofthe financialresult, are identified and presented separately,for example impairment of goodwill, restructuring, net profitfrom divestments and otherincome or costs that are notrecurring, are reported as items affecting comparability. The change applies as of 1 January 2017 and comparative numbers have been restated.
These changes have not had a material effect on the financial statements ofthe Group or on capital adequacy and large exposures.
CHANGES IN IFRSs NOT YET APPLIED
Consideration will be given in the future to the implications, if any, ofthe following new and revised standards and interpretations.
IFRS 9 Financial Instruments – IFRS 9 replaces IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement. The standard includes a revised modelfor classification and measurement offinancial instruments, a new impairment model based on expected creditloss and an amended approach for hedge accounting. The standard is endorsed by the EU and should be applied from 1 January 2018. SEB has not adopted IFRS 9 in previous reporting periods. For transitional purposes the quantitative indicator used for assessing significant increase in creditrisk forimpairment purposes is based on risk class or equiv alent. The Group has elected to continue applying the principles in IAS 39 relating to hedge accounting. As permitted by the transitional provisions, SEB will notrestate comparative periods with regards to IFRS 9. The application ofIFRS 9 related to impairmentresults in increased provisions by SEK 1.6bn before tax and an overallreduction ofretained earnings of SEK 1.2bn. An effectfrom applying classification and measurementis that a positive market valuation of SEK 0.3bn is removed when classification is changed to amortised cost. Further, within the German business the classification of some issued debtinstruments is changed from amortised costto fair value through profit orloss with a negative impact of SEK 1.8bn in equity. The overall effect from IFRS 9 will decrease the Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capitalratio by 34 basis points as of 1 January 2018. Large exposures are not affected. The Group has decided notto apply the possibility underthe transitionalrules in the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR), allowing a phase in ofthe impact from impairment on CET1 capitalratio. For SEB's accounting policies related to IFRS 9 see section 1a below.
IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers – IFRS 15 replaces all previ ous revenue standards and related interpretations including IAS 11 Construction Contracts and IAS 18 Revenue but does not apply to financial instruments, insurance contracts orleasing contracts. IFRS 15 establishes the principles forreporting information aboutthe nature, amount,timing and uncertainty ofrevenue and cash flows from contract with customers. The standard is endorsed by EU and should be applied from 1 January 2018. SEB has identified thatthe treatment of contract costs forinvestment contracts within Life will change and as a result ofthe new more specific requirements, a smaller part of deferred acquisition costs will be recognised as an asset. The change will resultin a decrease ofthe deferred acquisition costin the balance sheet of SEK 2.6bn. SEB has chosen to apply IFRS 15 retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented. The effect willtherefore be recognised as a reduction ofretained earnings as of 1 January 2017. There will also be a restatement ofthe netfees and commissions in the income statementfor 2017 in the amount of SEK –47m. The changes will not have a material effect on capital adequacy and large exposures. For SEB's accounting policies related to IFRS 15 see section 1a below.
IFRS 16 Leases replaces IAS 17 Leases and related interpretations and was published in January 2016. The most significant effect ofthe new requirements is that a lessee willrecognise a lease asset (right-of-use asset) and a financial liability,representing mainly the present value ofleased premises, in the balance sheet. In the income statement,the straight-line operating lease expense will be replaced by a depreciation charge forthe lease asset and an interest expense on the financial liability. Currently the lessees' operating leases are notrecorded in the balance sheet. The accounting forlessors is in practice unchanged. SEB's current assessmentis thatthe new standard
mainly will increase the Group's balance sheettotal in the accounting for property leases. The Standard should be applied from 1 January 2019 and is endorsed by EU.
IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts was published in May 2017. This standard should be applied from 1 January 2021 and has not been endorsed by EU. IFRS 17 establishes principles forthe recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure ofissued insurance contracts. It also requires similar princi ples to be applied to held reinsurance contracts and issued investment con tracts with discretionary participation features. IFRS 17 replaces IFRS 4. SEB is currently evaluating the impact ofthe change to the financial statements of the Group.
IFRS 4 Insurance Contracts has been amended regarding applying IFRS 9 Financial Instruments together with IFRS 4 Insurance Contracts. The amend ment allows a temporary exemption from IFRS 9 for a limited period forinsur ers whose activities are predominantly connected with insurance. An insurer applying the temporary exemption continues to apply IAS 39 ratherthan applying IFRS 9. SEB has chosen to not apply the exemption in the Life division. Within the annual improvement cycle 2014–2016 IAS 28 Investments in associates and Joint Ventures have been clarified regarding the measurement of an associate orjoint venture atfair value. These amendments should be applied from 1 January 2018 and have been endorsed by EU. The changes will not have a material effect on the financial statements ofthe Group or on capital adequacy and large exposures.
IFRS 2 Share-based Payment has been amended regarding classification and measurement of share-based paymenttransactions. IAS 40 has been amended with clarification when transfers ofinvestment property can be made. IFRIC 22 Foreign Currency Transactions and Advance Consideration has been issued clarifying which exchange rate to use in transactions thatinvolve advance consideration paid orreceived in a foreign currency. These amend ments and interpretations should be applied from 1 January 2018 and have not been endorsed by EU. The changes will not have a material effect on the financial statements ofthe Group or on capital adequacy and large exposures.
IFRIC 23 Uncertainty overIncome Tax Treatments has been issued and specifies how to reflectthe effects of uncertainty in accounting forincome taxes. IAS 28 Interests in Associates and Joint Ventures has been amended so compa nies should apply IFRS 9 Financial Instruments to long-term interests in an associate orjoint venture thatform part ofthe netinvestmentin the associate orjoint venture. Amendments have been made to IFRS 9 Financial Instruments regarding prepaymentfeatures with negative compensation. IAS 23 Borrow ing Costs, IAS 12 Income Taxes, IFRS 3 Business Combinations and IFRS 11 Joint Arrangements have been amended within the Annual improvement cycle 2015–2017. These amendments and interpretations should be applied from 1 January 2019 and have not been endorsed by the EU. The changes will not have a material effect on the financial statements ofthe Group or on capital adequacy and large exposures.
Significant accounting policies ofthe parent company
Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken (SEB) AB is a public limited liability company with corporate number 502032-9081 and with registered office in Stock holm, Sweden.
The financial statements ofthe parent company are prepared in accordance with the Annual Accounts Actfor CreditInstitutions and Securities Companies (1995:1559),the regulation and general guidelines issued by the Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority, Annual Reports in CreditInstitu tions and Securities Companies (FFFS 2008:25) and statements from the Swedish Financial Reporting Board, RFR 2 and the additional UFR statements.
In accordance with the Financial Supervisory Authority's regulation,the parent company applies statutory IFRS. This means thatthe International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and interpretations ofthese standards as adopted by the EU have been applied to the extentthatis possible within the framework of Swedish legislation and considering the close tie between financialreporting and taxation. The accounting principles ofthe parent com pany differ, in certain aspects,from the accounting principles applied by the SEB Group. The essential differences are described below.
CHANGED ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The changed Group accounting policies and future accounting developments also applies to the parent company. The Swedish Annual Accounts Actfor CreditInstitutions and Securities Companies has been updated where the main change is new requirements to publish a sustainability and diversity report. In all other material aspects the accounting policies, basis for preparation and presentation forthe parent company are unchanged in comparison with the annualreportfor 2016.
With effectfrom 1 January 2018 the regulations and general guidelines issued by the Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority have been updated. The changes are mainly related to the implementation ofIFRS 9 and IFRS 15, e.g.the presentation of differentitems in the income statement and classification of seized assets.
PRESENTATION FORMAT
The presentation formatforthe balance sheet and the profit and loss account according to the Annual Accounts Actfor CreditInstitutions and Securities Companies is notin conformity with IFRS. Creditinstitutions and securities companies applying IFRS as adopted by the EU in their consolidated financial statements have the option to deviate from the presentation formatforthe balance sheet as stipulated by law, but may not deviate from the stipulated profit and loss account.
HOLDINGS IN SUBSIDIARIES AND ASSOCIATED COMPANIES
Shares and participating interests in subsidiaries and associated companies are measured at cost. Dividends on shares in subsidiaries and associated companies are recognised as income in profit orloss. Merger of subsidiaries through absorption are accounted for at consolidated values. The merger effectis reported in equity.
LEASING
Leasing contracts which are classified as finance leases in the consolidated accounts are accounted for as operating leases in the parent company.
PENSIONS
The parent company does not apply the provisions ofIAS 19 concerning accounting for defined benefit plans. Instead, pension costs are calculated on an actuarial basis in the parent company in accordance with the provisions of the Act on Safeguarding Pension Obligations and the Swedish Financial Super visory Authority's regulations. In Sweden, actuarial pension commitments are guaranteed by a pension foundation.
The recognised net cost of pensions is calculated as pensions paid and pen sion premiums less any compensation from the pension foundation. The net pension costforthe yearis reported under Staff costs in the parent compa ny's profit and loss account. Excess amounts as a result ofthe value ofthe plan assets exceeding the estimated pension obligations are notrecognised as an assetin the parent company's balance sheet. Deficits are recognised as a liability.
GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
In accordance with IAS 38, goodwill is not amortised in the consolidated financial statements. In the parent company financial statements, goodwill is amortised as any otherintangible asset on a straightline basis.
TAXES
In the parent company, untaxed reserves are recognised as a separate item in the balance sheet. Untaxed reserves comprise accelerated depreciation undertax regulations, including the deferred tax component. In the consoli dated financial statements, untaxed reserves are reported in retained earnings and deferred tax liability.
GROUP CONTRIBUTIONS
The net of Group contributions received and paid is reported in the parent company as appropriations.
Critical judgements in applying the accounting policies
Applying the Group's accounting policies requires in some cases the use of estimates and assumptions that have a material impact on the amounts reported in the financial statements. The estimates are based on expert judgements and assumptions that management believes are true and fair. The management continuously evaluates these judgements and estimates. The most significant assumptions and estimates are associated with the areas described below:
CONSOLIDATION OF MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANIES AND FUNDS
Within the life insurance operations ofthe SEB Group Gamla Livförsäkrings AB SEB Trygg Liv operates as a mutual life insurance company. The entity is not consolidated, as the judgement ofthe Group is thatit does not have control of the entity. Control is seen to imply the powerto govern the financial and operating policies of an entity in orderto affectthe amount ofits returns from the entity. Life insurance entities operated as mutual life insurance companies cannot pay dividends which is why the Group deems thatit cannot obtain ben efits. In Gamla Livförsäkrings AB SEB Trygg Liv there are specific policies specifying the composition ofthe board, which implies thatthe SEB Group is not able to govern the financial and operating policies ofthe entity.
In the assessment whetherto consolidate funds, an assessmentis made whetherthe Group is considered to be an agent or a principal. The Group is considered a principal, and hence controls the fund, when itis the fund manager, cannot be removed without cause, has significantrightto returns from the fund by holding units and earning fee income and has the practical ability to influence its return by using its power. Funds managed by the Group in which entities within the Group owns more than 20 per cent are analysed furtherfor consolidation.
The policyholders in SEB's unit-linked company choose to investin a variety offunds. The insurance company providing unit-linked products invests in the funds chosen by the customers. By doing so SEB might, in some cases, hold more than 50 per cent ofthe funds, which it holds on behalf ofthe customers for whom it acts as investment manager. Due to the legislation regarding fund operations, SEB considers thatit does not have the powerto govern the financial and operating policies of such investmentfunds to obtain benefits. This applies irrespective of whetherthe funds held on behalf of customers are greater orless than 50 per cent of a fund. Itis the policyholders who carry the investmentrisk, not SEB. Consequently,the policyholders are entitled to all ofthe returns generated by the funds. SEB only charges fees, on market conditions,for managing the funds. SEB has come to the conclusion thatthese funds which it manages should not be consolidated. However,the shares that the Group holds in such funds on behalf ofits customers are recognised in the balance sheet.
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The objective ofthe fair value measurementis to arrive atthe price at which an orderly transaction would take place between market participants atthe measurement date under current market conditions. The best evidence offair value is a quoted price forthe instrument being measured in an actively traded market. Where the marketfor a financial instrumentis not active,fair value is calculated using an established valuation technique. These valuation techniques involve a degree of estimation,the extent of which depends on the instrument's complexity and the availability of market-based data. When val uing financial liabilities atfair value own credit standing is reflected. Given the uncertainty and subjective nature of valuing financial instruments atfair value, itis possible thatthe outcomes in the nextfinancial year could differ from the assumptions used.
For some ofthe Group's financial assets and liabilities, especially for cer tain derivatives, quoted prices are not available, and valuation models are used to estimate fair value. As part ofthe fair value measurement, valuation adjustments are made when valuing derivative financial instruments,to incor porate counterparty and own creditrisk. The methodologies for estimating valuation adjustments are continuously revised as a result of changing market practices in response to regulatory and accounting policy changes, as well as general market developments.
The Group has an established control environmentforthe determination offair values offinancial instruments thatincludes a review, independently from the business, of valuation models and prices. Ifthe validation principles are not adhered to,the Head of Group Finance shall be informed. Exceptions with material and principal importance require approvalfrom the Valuation Committee and the SEB ARC (Accounting Policy and Financial Reporting Committee). For disclosure purposes, fair values are classified in a fair value hierarchy according to the level of observability of the inputs, see note 21 Fair value measurement.
IMPAIRMENT TESTING OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND GOODWILL Financial assets
When calculating loan impairment allowances on both individually assessed and collectively assessed loans critical judgements and estimates are applied. Assessing financial assets individually forimpairmentrequires judge mentto establish the counterparty's repayment capacity and the realisable value of any collateral. The mostimportant aspect when testing a group of financial assets collectively forimpairmentis to identify the events thatindicate incurred losses. In assessing collective impairmentthe Group uses sta tistical models based on the probability of default and the amount ofloss incurred, considering collaterals and recovery rates. The outcome is adjusted for management's judgement as to whether current economic and credit con ditions are such thatthe actual losses are likely to be greater orless than sug gested by the models. Defaultrates and loss rates are regularly benchmarked against actual outcomes to ensure thatthey remain appropriate.
Adjusting models for collective impairmenttesting to current market situa tion also require a high degree of expertjudgementto ensure a reliable estimate. The assessment and assumptions are regularly reviewed by the credit organisation ofthe Group.
Goodwill
Judgementis involved in determining the cash-generating units. The annual impairmenttest of goodwill is based on the value in use with forecasted cash flows forfive years. The cash flows beyond five years are determined based on sustainable growth.
The estimation offuture cash flows and the calculation ofthe rate used to discountthose cash flows involves a number ofjudgmental areas:the prepa ration of cash flow forecasts for periods that are beyond the normalrequirements of managementreporting and the assessment ofthe discountrate appropriate to the business.
Note 28 describe tangible and intangible assets in more detail.
CALCULATION OF INSURANCE LIABILITIES
Calculation ofthe Group's insurance liabilities is based on a number of estima tions and assumptions, both financial and actuarial, such as interestrates, mortality, health, expenses, inflation and taxes. One ofthe importantfinancial assumptions is the interestrate used for discounting future cash flows.
Assumption on interestrates is based on regulations from each local Financial Supervisory Authority (FSA). All other assumptions are based on inter nally acquired experience.
FAIR VALUE OF INVESTMENT PROPERTY
Investment properties in the insurance operations are fair valued with the assistance of external expertise. The valuation method applied means that the related expected cash flows are discounted to present value. The assumptions concerning expected cash flows are based on assumptions on future rents, vacancy levels, operating and maintenance costs, yield requirement and marketinterest. Assumptions are in line with the assessments that the market can be expected to make under current market conditions. The yield requirementis based on local analysis of comparable property pur chases.
VALUATION OF DEFERRED TAX ASSETS
Deferred tax assets that are relying on future profitability can be recognised only to the extentthey can be offset againstfuture taxable income and the valuation of deferred tax assets is influenced by management's assessment of SEB's future profitability,future taxable profits and future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences. The expected outcome of uncertain tax positions is determined as the single mostlikely outcome.
PROVISIONS
Judgementis involved in determining whether a present obligation exists, and in estimating the probability,timing and amount of any outflows. Provisions for claims in civil lawsuits and regulatory matters typically require a higher degree ofjudgementthan othertypes of provisions.
ACTUARIAL CALCULATIONS OF DEFINED BENEFIT PLANS
The calculation ofthe Group's expense and obligations for defined benefit plans is based on actuarial, demographic and financial assumptions that have a significantimpact on the recognised amounts. One ofthe importantfinancial assumptions is the interestrate used for discounting future cash flows. The estimation ofthe discountrate is subjectto uncertainty around whether corporate bond markets are deep enough, of high quality and also in connection to the extrapolation of yield curves to relevant maturities. The discount rate is based on high quality corporate bonds in a deep market, in Sweden covered bonds. The covered bonds in Sweden are atleast AAA-rated and the maturity is in line with the estimated maturity of obligations for post-employ ment benefits. The discountrate forthe defined benefit obligation is revised quarterly and other assumptions are revised each year or when a significant change has occurred.
Note 9b describing staff costs contain a list of the most critical assumptions used when calculating the defined benefit obligation.
1a Significant changed accounting policies applicable from 1 January 2018
Significant accounting policies forthe Group
TRANSITION
IFRS 9 Financial Instruments
The Group adopted IFRS 9 Financial Instruments with a date oftransition 1 January 2018. The standard covers three areas; classification and measure ment, impairment and hedge accounting. The Group has elected to continue applying the principles in IAS 39 relating to hedge accounting. Fortransitional purposes the quantitative indicator used for assessing significantincrease in
creditrisk forimpairment purposes is based on risk class or equivalent. As permitted by the transitional provisions in IFRS 9,the Group has elected not to restate comparative figures. Any adjustments to the carrying amounts of financial assets and liabilities atthe date oftransition are recognised in the opening retained earnings and otherreserves as at 1 January 2018.
IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers
The Group adopted IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers with a date oftransition 1 January 2018. The Group chose to apply the standard retrospectively to each priorreporting period presented. The transition effect is therefore recognised as a reduction ofthe opening retained earnings, as at 1 January 2017.
FINANCIAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
Financial assets
Financial assets are recognised on the balance sheetwhen theGroup becomes a party to the contractual provisions ofthe instrument and are measured at fair value on initialrecognition. Transaction costs are included in the fair value on initialrecognition exceptforfinancial assets atfair value through profit or loss where transaction costs are expensed in profit orloss. Financial assets are derecognised when the rights to receive cash flows have expired,the Group has transferred substantially allrisks and rewards and upon substan tial modification. Transfers offinancial assets with retention of all or substan tially allrisks and rewards include for example repurchase transactions and securities lending transactions. Financial assets atfair value are recognised on the balance sheet on trade date, with exception ofloans and reversed repos which are recognised on settlement date. Financial assets measured at amortised cost are recognised on settlement date.
The Group classifies and subsequently measures its financial assets in the following categories:financial instruments atfair value through profit orloss; fair value through other comprehensive income and amortised cost. The clas sification will depend on ifthe financial assetis a debtinstrument, an equity instrument or a derivative.
Debt instruments (Loans and debt securities)
The classification is based on a combination of assessing the business model for managing the financial assets and whetherthe contractual cash flow characteristics consist of solely payments of principal and interest ('SPPI'). The business model assessmentis performed for homogenous portfolios identified based on how the business is managed in the divisions ofthe Group. The assessmentis based on reasonable scenarios taking into consideration how the portfolio is evaluated and reported to management;the risks affecting the performance ofthe portfolio and how these risks are managed; how man agers are compensated; and the frequency, value and timing of sales including the reasons forthe sales. In determining ifthe cash flows consist solely of principal and interest,the principal is defined as the fair value ofthe debt instrument atinitialrecognition, which can change overthe life ifthere are repayments or capitalisation ofinterest. Interest cash flows are consistent with components per a basic lending arrangementincluding consideration for time value of money, creditrisk, liquidity risk as well as administrative costs and profit margin. Ifthere are contractualfeatures introducing an exposure to otherrisks or volatility, itis not considered to consist of solely payments of principal and interest. Debtinstruments are presented in the balance sheet items; Cash and cash balances with central banks, Loans to creditinstitutions, Loans to the public and Debt securities, and include instruments in the following measurement categories.
Fair value through profit orloss: Debtinstruments are classified in this category if not meeting the criteria for amortised cost orfair value through other comprehensive income. This is the case ifthe business model is held fortrading; where financial assets are considered held fortrading ifthey are held with the intention to be sold in the short-term and forthe purpose of generating profits. Debtinstruments are mandatorily measured atfair value through profit orloss ifthe assets are managed and evaluated on a fair value basis or the assets are held with an intention to sell alternatively ifthe cash flows do not consist of solely payments of principal and interest. Debtinstruments that would otherwise be classified as fair value through other comprehensive income or amortised cost are also included in this category if, upon initial recognition, designated atfair value through profit orloss (fair value option). The fair value option can be applied only in situations where such designation reduces measurementinconsistencies.
Fair value through other comprehensive income: Debtinstruments are clas sified in this category if both ofthe following criteria are met (a) the business model objective is to both hold assets to collect contractual cash flows and to sellthe assets (b) the contractual cash flow characteristics consist of solely payments of principal and interest. The assets are measured atfair value and gains and losses arising from changes in fair value are reported in other com prehensive income and accumulated in equity. The cumulative gain orloss is reclassified from equity to profit orloss upon derecognition ofthe debtinstrument. Interest calculated by applying the effective interest method on inter est-bearing financial assets and expected creditlosses are recognised in profit orloss.
Amortised cost: Debtinstruments are classified in this category if both ofthe following criteria are met (a) the business model objective is to hold assets to collect contractual cash flows and (b) the contractual cash flow characteristics consist of solely payments of principal and interest. The gross carrying amount ofthese assets is measured using the effective interest method and adjusted for expected creditlosses.
Equity instruments
Equity instruments are per default classified as financial assets atfair value
through profit orloss. An irrevocable election can be made on initialrecogni tion to classify equity instruments (not held fortrading) atfair value through other comprehensive income.
Derivatives
Derivatives are classified as fair value through profit orloss (held fortrading) unless designated as hedging instruments. If designated as hedging instruments,the principles for hedge accounting are applied.
Modification
The Group may renegotiate loans and modify contractualterms. Ifthe new terms are substantially differentfrom the originalterms,the Group derecog nises the originalfinancial asset and recognises a new asset. The Group also assesses whetherthe new financial assetis credit-impaired atinitialrecogni tion. Ifthe terms are not substantially different,the modification does not resultin derecognition and the Group recalculates the gross carrying amount based on the new cash flows using the original effective interestrate ofthe financial asset and recognises a modification gain orloss.
Reclassification
In rare circumstances debtinstruments (financial assets) excluding those designated atfair value through profit orloss on initialrecognition, can be reclassified ifthere has been a change in the business modelfor managing the financial asset.
Financial liabilities
Financial liabilities are measured atfair value on initialrecognition. In case the financial liabilities are measured atfair value through profit orloss,transac tion costs directly attributable to the acquisition orthe issuance ofthe financial liability are recognised in profit orloss. For otherfinancial liabilities direct transaction cost are recognised as a deduction from the fair value.
Financial liabilities are derecognised when extinguished,thatis, when the obligation is discharged, cancelled or expired.
Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss
Financial liabilities atfair value through profit orloss are either classified as held fortrading or designated as fair value through profit orloss on initial recognition (fair value option). The fair value option can be applied for classi fication offinancial liabilities if meeting either ofthe following criteria;the contracts include one or more embedded derivatives,the instruments are managed and evaluated on a fair value basis orin situations where such desig nation reduces measurementinconsistencies. Liabilities to policyholders and some debt securities are included in this category. Financial liabilities held for trading are primarily short positions in interest-bearing securities, equity instruments and derivatives not designated as hedging instruments.
Other financial liabilities
The category otherfinancial liabilities primarily include the Group's short term and long-term borrowings. Afterinitialrecognition otherfinancial liabili ties are measured at amortised cost, using the effective interest method. The balance sheetitems Deposits from creditinstitutions, Deposits and borrow ings from the public and Debt securities are included in this category.
Offsetting financial transactions
Financial assets and liabilities are offset and the net amountreported in the balance sheet when there is a legalrightto offsettransactions and an inten tion to settle net orrealise the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.
Embedded derivatives
Some combined contracts contain both a derivative and a non-derivative component. In such cases,the derivative componentis termed an embedded derivative. Ifthe host contractis a financial assetin scope ofIFRS 9 the con tractis assessed for classification in its entirety and the embedded derivative is not separated. For other hybrid instruments (i.e.the host contractis not a financial assetin scope ofIFRS 9) where the economic characteristics and risks ofthe embedded derivatives are not closely related to those ofthe host contract, ,the embedded derivative is bifurcated and reported atfair value with gains and losses being recognised in the income statement. This does not apply ifthe host contractis carried atfair value through profit orloss.
Certain combined instruments are classified as financial liabilities atfair value through profit orloss according to the fair value option. The designation implies thatthe entire combined instrumentis measured atfair value through profit and loss.
Repurchase agreements
Securities may be lent or sold subjectto a commitmentto repurchase them (a 'repo') at a fixed price and at a predetermined date. Such securities are retained on the balance sheet and in addition included separately as collateral pledged for own liabilities when cash consideration is received. Depend ing on the counterparty, paymentreceived is recognised under Deposits by creditinstitutions or as Deposits and borrowing from the public.
Similarly, where the Group borrows or purchases securities subjectto a commitmentto resellthem (a 'reverse repo'),the securities are notincluded in the balance sheet. Payments made are recognised as Loans to creditinsti tutions or as Loans to the public. Repurchase and reverse repurchase agree ments are measured atfair value through profit orloss.
Securities borrowing and lending
Securities borrowing and lending transactions are entered into on a collateralised basis. Fair values of securities received or delivered are monitored on a daily basis to require or provide additional collateral. Cash collateral deliv ered is derecognised from the balance sheet and a corresponding receivable is recognised. Cash collateralreceived is recognised in the balance sheet and a corresponding obligation to return it, is recognised. Securities lentremain on the balance sheet and are in addition reported as pledged assets. Borrowed securities are notrecognised as assets. When borrowed securities are sold (short position), an amount corresponding to the fair value ofthe securities is booked as a liability. Securities received in a borrowing orlending transaction are disclosed as obligations.
Fair value measurement
For accounting principles relating to fair value measurement,referto principles in Note 1.
Hedge accounting
The Group has elected to continue applying the principles in IAS 39 relating to hedge accounting,referto principles in Note 1.
OPERATING INCOME
Interest income and interest expense
The effective interest method is applied to recognise interestincome and interest expenses in profit orloss forfinancial assets and financial liabilities measured at amortised cost.
The effective interest method is a method of calculating the gross carrying amount of a financial asset orthe amortised cost of a financial liability and of allocating interestincome and interest expenses. The effective interestrate is the rate that discounts estimated future cash payments orreceipts through the expected life ofthe financial instrumentto the net carrying amount of the financial instrument. When calculating future payments, all payments included in the terms and conditions ofthe contracts, such as advance pay ments, are taken into consideration. The calculation ofthe effective interest rate includes fees and points to be received and paid that are an integral part ofthe effective interestrate. However, expected creditlosses are nottaken into account.
If a financial asset subsequently has become creditimpaired the interest income is recognised applying the effective interestrate to the amortised cost, i.e. gross carrying amount adjusted forthe loss allowance. In case a financial assetis credit-impaired atinitialrecognition,the expected credit losses are included in the estimated cash flows to calculate a credit adjusted effective interestrate which then is applied to recognise the interest income.
Fee and commission income
The recognition ofrevenue from contracts with customers is reported as fee and commission income. This does not apply forrevenue from leasing con tracts, insurance contracts orfinancial instruments and other contractual obligations within the scope ofIFRS 9 Financial Instruments.
Fees that are included in the calculation ofthe effective interestrate of a financial instrument measured at amortised cost, such as loan origination fees, are allocated overthe expected tenor ofthe instrument applying the effective interest method and presented in Netinterestincome.
Fee and commission income is recognised to depictthe transfer of promised services to the customers in an amountthatreflects the consideration to which SEB expects to be entitled in exchange forthe service. The major types offees are described below.
Fee and commission income for asset custody and asset managementto customers is recognised as revenue overthe period in which the services are provided. Performance based fees are recognised when itis highly probable that a significantreversal ofrecognised revenue will not occur, which is most often when the performance criteria are fulfilled.
Fee and commission income from loan syndications in which SEB acts as arranger are recognised as income when the syndication is completed and the Group has retained no part ofthe loan orretained a part ofthe loan atthe same effective interestrate as other participants. Brokerage fees, commission and fees from negotiating a transaction for a third party, such as arrange ment of acquisitions or purchase or sale of a business, are recognised on com pletion ofthe transaction.
Expenses that are directly related to the generation offee and commission income are recognised as fee and commission expense.
Net financial income
Gains and losses arising from changes in fair value offinancial assets and liabilities measured atfair value through profit orloss are reported under the item Netfinancial income. Forfinancial liabilities designated atfair value through profit orloss the change in fair value relating to change in own credit risk is accounted forin other comprehensive income.
Dividend income
Dividends are recognised when the entity's rightto receive paymentis established.
EXPECTED CREDIT LOSS
Measurement
The impairmentrequirements are based on an expected creditloss (ECL) model. The guiding principle ofthe ECL model is to reflectthe general pattern of deterioration orimprovementin the credit quality offinancial instruments. Allfinancial assets measured at amortised cost and fair value through other comprehensive income, as well as lease receivables,financial guarantees contracts, contract assets and certain loan commitments are in scope for expected creditloss.
ECLs on financial assets measured at amortised cost and lease receivables are presented as allowances, i.e., as an integral part ofthe measurement of those assets in the balance sheet. The allowance reduces the gross carrying amount. ECLs on loan commitments and financial guarantee contracts are presented as provisions, i.e., as a liability, in the balance sheet. Adjustment to the loss allowance and provision due to changes in ECLs is recognised in the income statement as net expected creditlosses.
The assessment of creditrisk, and the estimation of ECL, shall be unbiased and probability-weighted, and shall incorporate all available information which is relevantto the assessment, including information about past events, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts offuture events and economic conditions atthe reporting date. SEB uses both models and expert creditjudgement (ECJ) for calculating ECLs.
The ECL model has a three-stage approach based on changes in the credit risk. A 12-month ECL (Stage 1) applies to all items, unless there is a significant increase in creditrisk since initialrecognition. Foritems where there is a sig nificantincrease in creditrisk (Stage 2) orin default (Stage 3), lifetime ECL applies.
Significant increase in credit risk
Atthe end of each reporting period the Group performs an assessment of whether creditrisk has increased significantly since initialrecognition. The assessment of whetherthere has been a significant change in creditrisk is based on quantitative and qualitative indicators. Indicators include payments that are past due >30 days and <90 days and financial assets that have been classified as watch-list or with forbearance measures (loans whose contrac tualterms have been revised due to the customer's financial difficulties). A quantitative indicatoris calculated based on the change in lifetime probability of default (PD) by comparing the scenario-weighted annualised lifetime PD atthe reporting date with the scenario-weighted annualised lifetime PD at initialrecognition. In case there has been a significantincrease in creditrisk since initialrecognition, an allowance forlifetime ECL shall be recognised and the financial instrumentis transferred to Stage 2. The approach is symmetrical, meaning thatin subsequentreporting periods, ifthe credit quality ofthe financial instrumentimproves such thatthere is no longer a significant increase in creditrisk since initialrecognition,the financial assets moves back to Stage 1.
Definition of default
Financial instruments in default are in Stage 3. SEB applies a definition of defaultfor accounting purposes thatis consistent with how itis defined in the capitalrequirements regulation, which includes financial assets past due more than 90 days.Allfinancial assets in Stage 3 are considered credit-impaired.
Modelling
The ECL is calculated as a function ofthe probability of default (PD),the exposure at default (EAD) and the loss given default (LGD), as well as the timing of the loss. The Group's IFRS 9 methodology for ECL measurementis based on existing internalrating-based risk models (IRB) to the extent allowed under IFRS 9. As the objectives ofthese frameworks differ,the mannerin which the expected creditlosses are calculated also differs and appropriate adjustments are made to the IRB parameters to meetIFRS 9 requirements. Adjustments include the conversion ofthrough-the-cycle and downturn parameters used in IRB risk models to point-in-time parameters used underIFRS 9 that considers forward-looking information.
PD represents the likelihood that a loan will not be repaid and will go into defaultin either a 12-month orlifetime horizon. The expected PD for each individual instrumentincorporates a consideration of past events, current market conditions and reasonable and supportable information aboutfuture eco nomic conditions. SEB uses IFRS 9 specific PD models. The models are calibrated based on a combination of geography, assets class and producttype. EAD represents an estimate ofthe outstanding amount of credit exposure at the time a default may occur. For off-balance sheet amounts, EAD includes an estimate of any further amounts to be drawn atthe time of default. ForIFRS 9, EAD models are adjusted for a 12-month orlifetime horizon. LGD is the amount that may not be recovered in the event of default. LGD takes into consideration the amount and quality of any collateral held. SEB uses existing LGD models adjusted to meetIFRS 9 requirements.
When measuring ECL, SEB uses the maximum contractual period during which SEB is exposed to risk. All contractualterms are considered when determining the expected life, including prepayment options and extension and rollover options. Forrevolving facilities, such as credit cards, and retail mortgage facilities the expected life is modelled based on historical behaviour.
Forward-looking information
The Group uses internally developed macroeconomic forecasts as the basis forthe forward-looking information incorporated in the ECL measurement. In orderto ensure an unbiased estimation of creditlosses underIFRS 9, atleast three scenarios shall be used. One ofthe scenarios shall be the base case sce nario,representing the mostlikely outcome, which is also applied in the regu larfinancial planning and budgeting process, while other case scenarios shall represent more optimistic or pessimistic outcomes.
Forward-looking scenarios shall be prepared by SEB's Research Department. The base scenarios shall be benchmarked to various external sources of similarforward-looking scenarios, e.g.from OECD, IMF, EU Commission and National Statistics Offices, and shall be used as inputs to the scenarios applied. The scenarios shall be approved by the Group Risk Committee.
A scenario shall consist of a qualitative description ofthe macroeconomic development and a quantitative part, where the development of key macro economic drivers is shown on a yearly basis as well as the likelihood of occur rence (scenario-weight). The quantitative part shall coverthe current macroeconomic environment and forecasts up to three years. In general, scenarios shall be reviewed on a quarterly basis. In case of significant changes in the macroeconomic environment and outlook,the scenarios shall be updated.
Expert Credit Judgement
The Group uses both models and expert creditjudgement (ECJ) in orderto determine ECLs. The degree ofjudgementthatis required to estimate ECL depends on the model outcome, materiality and the availability of detailed information. The model provides guidance and transparency as to how eco nomic events could affectthe impairment offinancial assets. ECJ may be applied to the modelled outcome to incorporate an estimated impact offac tors not captured by the model. Such judgemental adjustmentto the model generated ECLs may be applied to significant exposures at a counterparty level. The adjustments are decided by the relevant credit committee using the model ECLs as guidance. In addition there may be a need for adjustments at a portfolio level, which is decided by the Group Risk Committee.
INSURANCE AND INVESTMENT CONTRACTS
Insurance contracts are contracts under which the Group accepts significant insurance risk – defined as a transfer of an absolute risk of minimum 5 percent ofthe underlying value – from the policyholder by agreeing to compensate the policyholder or other beneficiaries on the occurrence of a defined insured event. Investment contracts are financial instruments that do not meetthe definition of an insurance contract, as they do nottransfer significantinsur ance risk from the policyholderto the Group.
Insurance contracts
For accounting principles relating to insurance contracts,referto principles in Note 1.
Investment contracts
The majority ofthe Group's unitlinked insurance is classified as investment contracts where no significantinsurance risk is transferred from the policyholderto the Group. A minor part ofthe Group's unitlinked insurance business is classified as insurance contracts.
Measurement
Investment contracts are financial commitments whose fair value is depend ent on the fair value ofthe underlying financial assets. The underlying assets are mandatorily measured atfair value through profit orloss and the related liabilities are designated atfair value through profit orloss (fair value option). The choice to use the fair value option has been made forthe purpose of elimi nating the measurementinconsistency that would occurif different bases for measurement would have been used for assets and liabilities. The fair value ofthe unitlinked financial liabilities is determined using the fair value ofthe financial assets linked to the financial liabilities attributed to the policyholder on the balance sheet date. However, ifthe liability is subjectto a surrender option,the fair value ofthe financial liability is neverless than the amount payable on surrender.
Revenue recognition
Amounts received from and paid to policyholders are reported in the balance sheet as deposits or withdrawals. Fees charged for managing investment contracts are recognised as revenue. The revenue forthese management services is evenly distributed overthe tenor ofthe contracts.
Recognition of expenses
Incremental costs of obtaining investment contracts with customers are deferred ifthey are expected to be recovered. Incremental costs are costs to obtain a contract with a customerthat would not have been incurred ifthe contract had not been obtained. These costs are up-front acquisition costs in the form of sales commissions paid for obtaining investment contracts. They are expected to be recovered from the fee income earned from the investment contracts. Deferred acquisition costs are reported in profit orloss as the related revenue is recognised. The assetis tested forimpairment during each accounting period to ensure thatthe future economic benefits expected to arise from the contract exceed the carrying amount ofthe asset. All other costs, such as commissions to brokers paid during the tenor ofthe investment contracts or commission to own staff acting as sales agents or ongoing admin istration cost, are recognised in the accounting period in which they arise.
Significant changed accounting policies of the parent company applicable 1 January 2018
FINANCIAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
The changed Group accounting policies also applies to the parent company, with the exception offinancial liabilities designated as fair value through profit orloss where the change in fair value relating to change in own credit risk is accounted forin profit orloss.
New and amended critical judgements forIFRS 9 and IFRS 15 from 2018
EXPECTED CREDIT LOSS MODEL
When calculating expected creditloss (ECL) there are a number of key con cepts thatrequire a high level ofjudgement. Estimating expected creditloss is, by its very nature, uncertain and the accuracy ofthese estimates depends on many factors, e.g. macroeconomic forecasts and involves complex model ling and judgements. The assessment of significantincrease in creditrisk is a new concept underIFRS 9 Financial Instruments and willrequire significant judgement. Atthe end of each reporting period the Group shall perform an assessment of whether creditrisk has increased significantly since initial recognition by considering the change in the risk of default occurring overthe remaining life ofthe financial instrument, using key risk indicators that are used in the Group's existing risk management processes. Another area requiring significantjudgementis the incorporation offorward-looking information and macroeconomic scenarios. IFRS 9 requires an unbiased and probability weighted estimate of creditlosses by evaluating a range of possible out comes thatincorporates forecasts offuture economic conditions. SEB uses internally developed macroeconomic forecasts as the basis forthe forward looking information in the ECL measurement. SEB uses both models and expert creditjudgement (ECJ) in orderto determine ECLs. The objective of applying ECJ is to incorporate the estimated impact offactors not captured in the modelled ECL. The degree ofjudgementthatis required to estimate expected creditlosses depends on the outcome from calculations, material ity and the availability of detailed information. The models, assessment and assumptions are regularly reviewed by the risk organisation ofthe Group and approved by the Group Risk Committee.
FEE AND COMMISSION INCOME
In recognising fee and commission income SEB makes judgements to deter mine the amount and timing ofrevenue from contracts with customers.
When SEB performs e.g. custody, asset management or administration of clients investment policies the fees are based on the time period the service is provided and/or on the amounts of underlying assets. SEB's judgementis thatthe customer simultaneously receives and consumes the service and SEB's obligations are therefore satisfied overthe time the service is provided.
When SEB performs e.g. brokerage, negotiations oftransactions forthird parties such as arrangement of acquisitions or purchase or sale of businesses or acts as an arrangerin loan syndications SEB's judgementis thatthe cus tomer obtains control ofthe asset and SEB's obligations are satisfied atthe time ofthe completion ofthe transaction.
When fees are based on SEB's performance SEB recognise revenue based on judgements when itis highly probable that a significantreversal ofrecog nised revenue will not occur, which is most often when the performance crite ria are fulfilled.
ASSETS RECOGNISED FROM THE COSTS TO OBTAIN OR FULFIL A CONTRACT, DEFERRED ACQUISITION COSTS
SEB recognise as an asset, costs to obtain contracts that would not have incurred ifthe contract had not been obtained, mainly sales commissions to obtain insurance and investment contracts.
The amortisation period forthe assetis based on assumptions about average lifetime ofthe contracts including assumptions about surrenders and lapses.
2 Operating segments
Group business segments
| Large Corporates &Financial |
Corporate &Private |
Life& Investment |
1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement, 2017 | Institutions | Customers | Baltic | Management | Other | 492 6 Eliminations – |
472 36 Total |
| Interestincome Interest expense |
14,066 –6,022 |
11,794 –2,352 |
2,616 –243 |
–3 –87 |
14,491 –14,415 |
540 6 , |
580 16 , – |
| Netinterestincome | 8,043 | 9,442 | 2,373 | –90 | 76 | 430 6 , 48 – |
23 196 , 19,893 |
| Fee and commission income | 11,366 | 7,565 | 1,852 | 8,708 | 135 | 6 376 , |
472 5 , – |
| Fee and commission expense | –5,130 | –1,887 | –532 | –4,190 | –108 | , | , |
| Netfee and commission income | 6,236 | 5,678 | 1,320 | 4,519 | 27 | –54 | 17,725 |
| Netfinancial income Net otherincome |
3,465 573 |
441 87 |
231 –10 |
1,674 17 |
1,008 448 |
60 –4 |
6,880 1,112 |
| Total operating income | 18,318 | 15,648 | 3,914 | 6,120 | 1,558 | 51 51 |
45,609 |
| of which internally generated | –1,773 | 2,742 | 53 | –2,386 | 1,312 | ||
| Staff costs | –3,862 | –3,298 | –724 | –1,561 | –4,616 | 35 | –14,025 |
| Other expenses Depreciation, amortisation and impairment |
–5,046 | –3,872 | –965 | –963 | 3,984 | –85 | –6,947 |
| oftangible and intangible assets | –59 | –57 | –78 | –37 | –734 | –964 | |
| Total operating expenses | –8,967 | –7,226 | –1,766 | –2,561 | –1,365 | –51 | –21,936 |
| Gains less losses on disposals oftangible and | |||||||
| intangible assets | 1 | –164 | 1 | –162 | |||
| Net creditlosses | –529 | –276 | –7 | 4 | –808 | ||
| Operating profit before items affecting comparability | 8,823 | 8,146 | 1,977 | 3,558 | 198 | 22,702 | |
| Items affecting comparability | –1,896 | –1,896 | |||||
| OPERATINGPROFIT | 8,823 | 8,146 | 1,977 | 3,558 | –1,698 | 20,806 | |
| Business equity, SEK bn | 65.8 | 40.6 | 8.0 | 11.0 | |||
| Return on business equity, % Risk exposure amount, SEK bn |
10.1 376 |
15.0 120 |
21.9 74 |
27.8 4 |
37 | 611 | |
| Lending to the public 2), SEK bn | 551 | 744 | 129 | 6 | 1,430 | ||
| Deposits from the public 2), SEK bn | 416 | 384 | 114 | 86 | 999 | ||
| 20163) | |||||||
| 052 5 064 – |
202 35 |
||||||
| Interestincome Interest expense |
12,640 –4,333 |
10,378 –1,396 |
2,509 –364 |
–3 –57 |
14,730 –15,378 |
5 , |
16 464 , – |
| Netinterestincome | 8,307 | 8,982 | 2,145 | –60 | –648 | 5 776 , 12 – |
22 500 , 18,738 |
| Fee and commission income | 11,722 | 7,117 | 1,671 | 7,641 | 125 | 5 630 , |
872 5 – , |
| Fee and commission expense | –5,627 | –1,703 | –500 | –3,582 | –90 | , | , |
| Netfee and commission income | 6,095 | 5,414 | 1,171 | 4,059 | 35 | –146 | 16,628 |
| Netfinancial income Net otherincome |
4,187 389 |
394 55 |
218 –23 |
1,764 –17 |
332 437 |
161 –12 |
7,056 829 |
| Total operating income of which internally generated |
18,978 –1,138 |
14,845 7,545 |
3,511 –5 |
5,746 –2,231 |
156 –4,186 |
15 15 |
43,251 |
| Staff costs Other expenses |
–3,922 –4,972 |
–3,339 –3,713 |
–755 –959 |
–1,560 –984 |
–4,895 4,073 |
49 –64 |
–14,422 –6,619 |
| Depreciation, amortisation and impairment | |||||||
| oftangible and intangible assets | –34 | –69 | –66 | –45 | –557 | –771 | |
| Total operating expenses | –8,928 | –7,121 | –1,780 | –2,589 | –1,379 | –15 | –21,812 |
| Gains less losses on disposals oftangible and | |||||||
| intangible assets | –156 | 6 | –150 | ||||
| Net creditlosses | –563 | –376 | –56 | 2 | –993 | ||
| Operating profit before items affecting comparability | 9,487 | 7,348 | 1,519 | 3,157 | –1,215 | 20,296 | |
| Items affecting comparability | –354 | –68 | –5,007 | –5,429 | |||
| OPERATINGPROFIT | 9,133 | 7,348 | 1,451 | 3,157 | –6,222 | 14,867 | |
| Business equity, SEK bn | 62.4 | 37.3 | 7.9 | 11.6 | |||
| Return on business equity, % Risk exposure amount, SEK bn |
11.3 375 |
15.2 117 |
16.2 67 |
23.5 4 |
47 | 610 | |
| Lending to the public 2), SEK bn | 546 | 710 | 117 | 2 | 1,375 | ||
| Deposits from the public 2), SEK bn | 404 | 372 | 106 | 79 | 961 |
1) Profit and loss fromassociated companies accounted for underthe equitymethod are recognised in Net otherincome at an amount of SEK13m(19). The aggregated investments are SEK334m(229).
2) Excluding repos and debt securities.
3) Items affecting comparability restated, see note 49.
Balance sheet, 2017
| Assets Liabilities Investments |
1,175,651 1,098,360 164 |
829,749 779,589 151 |
160,683 150,880 121 |
1,942 | 514,139 1,135,275 500,695 1,142,048 1,186 |
–1,255,900 –1,255,900 |
2,559,596 2,415,671 3,563 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | |||||||
| Assets Liabilities Investments |
1,315,760 1,235,317 46 |
808,608 761,015 145 |
150,496 141,797 164 |
1,162 | 492,705 1,222,051 479,199 1,231,316 726 |
–1,368,974 –1,368,974 |
2,620,646 2,479,670 2,243 |
Note 2 continued Operating segments
Parent company business segments
| 2017 | Large Corporates &Financial Institutions |
Corporate &Private Customers |
Baltic | Life& Investment Management |
Other | Eliminations | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross income Assets Investments |
26,664 964,428 162 |
15,544 753,406 145 |
22 169 |
295 252 |
20,795 896,077 1,176 |
–584 –722,169 |
62,736 1,892,163 1,483 |
| 2016 | |||||||
| Gross income Assets Investments |
25,089 1,074,815 41 |
13,645 734,433 62 |
16 1,452 |
241 | 29,088 231 1,011,986 649 |
–9,926 –823,073 |
58,153 1,999,844 752 |
Business segment
The Business segments are presented on a managementreporting basis. The different divisions assist different groups of customers. The customers' demands decide the type of products that are offered. Large Corporates & Financial Institutions offers wholesale and investment banking services to large corporations and institutions. Corporate & Private Customers offers products and private banking services mainly to retail customers (private
customers and small and medium-sized corporates). Division Baltic offers products mainly to retail customers (private customers and small and medium-sized corporates) and private banking services in the Baltic countries. Life & Investment Management performs asset management and offers life, sickness, healthcare and pension insurance. Other consists of business support units,treasury and staff units. Eliminations ofinternaltransactions between the business segments are reported separately.
Gross income by productfor external customers
| Group | Parent company | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 20161) | 2017 | 2016 | ||
| Core banking | 35,672 | 33,920 | 24,191 | 22,691 | |
| Capital market | 12,477 | 13,158 | 11,283 | 11,199 | |
| Asset management | 8,483 | 7,580 | 2,279 | 2,114 | |
| Life insurance and pension | 3,445 | 3,572 | |||
| Other | 7,583 | 7,357 | 24,983 | 22,149 | |
| TOTAL | 67,660 | 65,587 | 62,736 | 58,153 |
1) Items affecting comparability restated, see note 49.
Core banking consists ofloan, leasing, card and paymentrelated products. Capital market consists oftrading and issues on financial markets. Asset man agement consists of advisory, custody and fund management. Life insurance
and pension consists of unit-linked and traditional life insurance products. Other consists ofincome from treasury operations and other activities.
3 Geographical information
| Group by country | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2016 | |||||||||
| Gross Income1) |
Operating | profit 2) Income tax expense 3) |
Assets | Invest ments |
Gross Income1) 7) |
Operating | profit 2) Income tax expense 3) |
Assets | Invest ments |
|
| Sweden | 43,466 | 12,333 | –2,703 | 2,046,020 | 2,103 | 41,662 | 4,916 | –1,845 | 2,138,812 | 1,488 |
| Norway | 5,206 | 1,859 | –433 | 102,138 | 94 | 5,178 | 2,366 | –622 | 115,284 | 26 |
| Denmark | 3,775 | 1,918 | –359 | 302,548 | 991 | 3,467 | 2,142 | –417 | 324,547 | 299 |
| Finland | 2,313 | 1,171 | –224 | 89,619 | 72 | 2,110 | 1,043 | –217 | 80,469 | 10 |
| Estonia6) | 1,658 | 927 | –72 | 54,815 | 64 | 1,528 | 916 | –47 | 50,405 | 58 |
| Latvia | 1,207 | 371 | –79 | 36,297 | 8 | 1,180 | 468 | –57 | 33,738 | 48 |
| Lithuania | 2,134 | 1,014 | –155 | 75,218 | 68 | 2,013 | 831 | –58 | 71,098 | 76 |
| Germany 4) |
2,517 | –433 | 2 | 30,459 | 3,312 | 507 | –420 | 34,454 | 3 | |
| Great Britain | 1,962 | 1,076 | –225 | 68,997 | 5 | 1,799 | 727 | –196 | 70,291 | 5 |
| Poland | 156 | 15 | –14 | 8,224 | 2 | 165 | 31 | –14 | 5,305 | 2 |
| Ukraine | 54 | 3 | –2 | 498 | 58 | 7 | –4 | 700 | ||
| China | 631 | 162 | –50 | 24,097 | 407 | 98 | –18 | 23,045 | 3 | |
| Ireland | 588 | 181 | 2 | 70,730 | 139 | 567 | 171 | –29 | 66,154 | 139 |
| Luxembourg | 1,484 | 385 | –65 | 53,155 | 5 | 2,644 | 322 | –39 | 73,747 | 6 |
| Russia | 370 | 28 | –16 | 5,300 | 2 | 313 | 26 | –15 | 3,950 | 2 |
| Singapore | 679 | 66 | –16 | 24,619 | 1 | 573 | 94 | –23 | 27,488 | 1 |
| United States 6) | 2,508 | –131 | –31 | 82,345 | 1,603 | 55 | –310 | 109,109 | ||
| Other countries 5) 6) | 3,109 | –139 | –122 | 198,502 | 10 | 3,098 | 147 | 82 | 209,357 | 77 |
| Group eliminations | –6,155 | –713,987 | –6,090 | –817,307 | ||||||
| TOTAL | 67,660 | 20,806 | –4,562 | 2,559,596 | 3,563 | 65,587 | 14,867 | –4,249 | 2,620,646 | 2,243 |
1)Gross income in theGroup is defined as the sumofInterestincome, Fee and commission income, Netfinancial income and Net otherincome according to IFRS. The basis for the income allocation is SEB's presence in each country,with the exception ofwhen the local companies / branches serve as sales offices and receive commission payments and the transaction is booked in the central unit.
2) Before tax.
3) For more information abouttax see note 15.
4) Excluding treasury operations.
5) Cayman Island,Hong Kong, Netherlands, Switzerland and treasury operations inGermany.
6)Until and including 2017, no income tax is paid in Estonia unless profitis distributed as dividend.On Cayman Island,the parent company is represented by a branch office which is aUnited States tax resident entity, why tax expense related to Cayman income is reported inUS.
7) Items affecting comparability restated, see note 49.
Note 3 continued Geographical information
Parent company by country
| 2017 | 2016 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Income1) | Assets | Investments | Gross Income1) | Assets | Investments | |||
| Sweden | 49,760 | 1,661,054 | 1,297 | 46,702 | 1,754,444 | 696 | ||
| Norway | 3,090 | 56,656 | 94 | 3,402 | 55,616 | 26 | ||
| Denmark | 1,920 | 67,499 | 3 | 1,979 | 76,074 | 3 | ||
| Finland | 1,278 | 5,927 | 71 | 1,168 | 9,888 | 9 | ||
| Other countries | 6,688 | 101,027 | 18 | 4,902 | 103,822 | 18 | ||
| TOTAL | 62,736 | 1,892,163 | 1,483 | 58,153 | 1,999,844 | 752 |
1)Gross income in the parent company is defined as the sumofInterestincome, Leasing income,Dividends, Fee and commission income, Net Financial income andOtherincome according to SFSAaccounting regulations. The basis forthe income allocation is SEB's presence in each country, with the exception of when the local companies / branches serve as sales offices and receive commission payments and the transaction is booked in the central unit.
Transfer pricing
The internaltransfer pricing objective in the SEB Group is to measure net interestincome,to transferinterestrate risk and liquidity and to manage liquidity. The internal price is based on SEB's actual orimplied market-based cost offunds for a specific interest and liquidity term. Transactions between Business segments are conducted at arm's length.
4 Net interest income
| Group | Parent company | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Average balance |
Interest | Interestrate | Average balance |
Interest | Interestrate | ||
| Loans to creditinstitutions and central banks Loans to the public Interest earning securities 1) |
418,258 1,500,385 191,328 |
2,198 26,734 1,884 |
0.53% 1.78% 0.98% |
582,286 1,168,445 180,355 |
1,994 20,156 1,696 |
0.34% 1.73% 0.94% |
||
| Total interest earnings assets | 2,109,970 | 30,815 | 1.46% | 1,931,086 | 23,847 | 1.23% | ||
| Derivatives and other assets | 741,644 | 5,657 | 311,886 | 8,439 | ||||
| Total assets | 2,851,614 | 36,472 | 2,242,972 | 32,285 | ||||
| Deposits from creditinstitutions Deposits and borrowing from the public Debt securities issued 2) Subordinated liabilities |
150,001 1,134,017 714,896 41,494 |
–686 –4,450 –10,594 –1,646 |
–0.46% –0.39% –1.48% –3.97% |
222,199 929,878 676,672 41,628 |
–1,028 –2,493 –10,613 –1,646 |
–0.46% –0.27% –1.57% –3.95% |
||
| Total interest bearing liabilities | 2,040,408 | –17,376 | –0.85% | 1,870,377 | –15,780 | –0.84% | ||
| Derivatives and otherliabilities Equity |
670,178 141,028 |
796 | 273,473 99,122 |
–1,970 | ||||
| Total liabilities and equity | 2,851,614 | –16,580 | 2,242,972 | –17,750 | ||||
| Netinterestincome | 19,893 | 14,536 | ||||||
| Net yield on interest earning assets | 0.94% | 0.75% | ||||||
| 1) of which, measured atfair value 2) of which, measured atfair value |
1,648 –755 |
1,702 –706 |
<-- PDF CHUNK SEPARATOR -->
Note 4 continued Netinterestincome
| Group | Parent company | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Average balance |
Interest | Interestrate | Average balance |
Interest | Interestrate | |
| Loans to creditinstitutions and central banks Loans to the public Interest earning securities 1) |
408,155 1,430,412 221,880 |
1,233 25,360 1,916 |
0.30% 1.77% 0.86% |
619,500 1,040,096 211,324 |
1,349 18,694 1,731 |
0.22% 1.80% 0.82% |
|
| Total interest earnings assets | 2,060,447 | 28,509 | 1.38% | 1,870,920 | 21,774 | 1.16% | |
| Derivatives and other assets | 773,214 | 6,693 | 410,818 | 7,248 | |||
| Total assets | 2,833,661 | 35,202 | 2,281,738 | 29,022 | |||
| Deposits from creditinstitutions Deposits and borrowing from the public Debt securities issued 2) Subordinated liabilities |
186,347 1,071,015 719,551 34,270 |
–372 –3,760 –10,799 –1,463 |
–0.20% –0.35% –1.50% –4.27% |
280,008 926,570 675,678 33,796 |
–838 –1,880 –10,859 –1,463 |
–0.30% –0.20% –1.61% –4.33% |
|
| Total interest bearing liabilities | 2,011,183 | –16,394 | –0.82% | 1,916,052 | –15,040 | –0.78% | |
| Derivatives and otherliabilities Equity |
686,312 136,166 |
–70 | 272,383 93,303 |
–183 | |||
| Total liabilities and equity | 2,833,661 | –16,464 | 2,281,738 | –15,223 | |||
| Netinterestincome | 18,738 | 13,799 | |||||
| Net yield on interest earning assets | 0.91% | 0.74% | |||||
| 1) of which, measured atfair value 2) of which, measured atfair value |
1,641 –664 |
1,735 –705 |
In the table above Loans and Deposits are presented excluding debt securities. This is differentfrom the Income statement and Balance sheetin which the classification is done based on accounting category.
Netinterestincome
| Parent company | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2016 | |
| Interestincome | 32,285 | 29,023 |
| Income from leases 1) | 5,481 | 5,443 |
| Interest expense | –17,750 | –15,223 |
| Depreciation ofleased equipment 1) | –4,817 | –4,704 |
| TOTAL | 15,200 | 14,539 |
1) In theGroup Netincome fromleases is classified as interestincome. In the parent company depreciation ofleased equipmentis reported asDepreciation, amortisation and impair ment oftangible and intangible assets.
5 Net fee and commission income
| Group | Parent company | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | ||
| Issue of securities | 724 | 484 | 1,035 | 838 | |
| Secondary market | 2,125 | 2,878 | 1,436 | 1,670 | |
| Custody and mutualfunds | 8,040 | 7,264 | 3,690 | 3,391 | |
| Securities commissions | 10,890 | 10,626 | 6,161 | 5,899 | |
| Payments | 1,850 | 1,677 | 1,512 | 1,334 | |
| Card fees | 3,610 | 3,526 | 505 | 392 | |
| Payment commissions | 5,460 | 5,203 | 2,017 | 1,726 | |
| Life insurance commissions | 1,707 | 1,653 | |||
| Advisory | 443 | 316 | 393 | 282 | |
| Lending | 2,254 | 2,527 | 1,889 | 2,065 | |
| Deposits | 276 | 221 | 71 | 59 | |
| Guarantees | 541 | 527 | 380 | 353 | |
| Derivatives | 439 | 475 | 400 | 530 | |
| Other | 1,186 | 952 | 843 | 734 | |
| Other commissions | 5,140 | 5,018 | 3,975 | 4,023 | |
| Fee and commission income | 23,196 | 22,500 | 12,153 | 11,648 | |
| Securities commissions | –2,001 | –2,248 | –1,217 | –1,378 | |
| Payment commissions | –2,006 | –1,940 | –619 | –604 | |
| Life insurance commissions | –598 | –614 | |||
| Other commissions | –866 | –1,070 | –760 | –823 | |
| Fee and commission expense | –5,472 | –5,872 | –2,596 | –2,805 | |
| Securities commissions, net | 8,889 | 8,378 | 4,944 | 4,521 | |
| Payment commissions, net | 3,454 | 3,263 | 1,398 | 1,122 | |
| Life insurance commissions, net | 1,109 | 1,039 | |||
| Other commissions, net | 4,273 | 3,948 | 3,215 | 3,200 | |
| TOTAL | 17,725 | 16,628 | 9,557 | 8,843 |
6 Net financial income
| Group | Parent company | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | |
| Gains (losses) on financial assets and liabilities held fortrading, net Gains (losses) on financial assets and liabilities designated atfair value |
6,239 | 6,026 | 5,563 | 5,425 |
| through profit and loss, net | –1,087 | –857 | –1,069 | –783 |
| Otherlife insurance income, net | 1,738 | 1,919 | ||
| Impairments of available-for-sale financial assets | –10 | –32 | ||
| TOTAL | 6,880 | 7,056 | 4,493 | 4,642 |
Gains (losses) on financial assets and liabilities held fortrading, net
| Equity instruments and related derivatives | 1,388 | 1,149 | 1,333 | 1,165 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt securities and related derivatives | 740 | 1,109 | 640 | 1,017 |
| Currency related | 4,024 | 3,699 | 3,512 | 3,186 |
| Other | 88 | 69 | 79 | 57 |
| TOTAL | 6,239 | 6,026 | 5,563 | 5,425 |
Gains (losses) on financial assets and liabilities held for trading are pre sented on different rows based on type of underlying financial instrument. Changes in the treasury result are due to changes in interest rates and credit spreads. The net effect from trading operations is fairly stable over time,
but shows volatility between rows. There were effects from structured products offered to the public in the amounts of approximately SEK 235m (555) in equity related derivatives and a corresponding effect in debt securities of SEK –340m (–180).
Gains (losses) on financial assets and liabilities designated atfair value through profit and loss, net
| Group | Parent company | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | |
| Equity instruments Debt securities |
22 –1,109 |
24 –881 |
–1,069 | –783 |
| TOTAL | –1,087 | –857 | –1,069 | –783 |
Valuation changes arising from counterparty creditrisk and own credit standing
| Derivatives – counterparty risk | 421 | –190 | 434 | –189 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Derivatives – own credit standing Issued securities designated atfair value through profit orloss |
–180 | 21 | –141 | 13 |
| – own credit standing | –31 | –50 | –57 | –50 |
| TOTAL | 210 | –219 | 236 | –226 |
7 Net other income
| Group | Parent company | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 20163) | 2017 | 2016 | |
| Dividends1) | 77 | 170 | ||
| Investments in associates | –38 | 218 | ||
| Gains less losses from investment securities | 203 | 410 | 624 | 217 |
| Gains less losses from tangible assets 2) | 27 | 14 | ||
| Gains less losses from divestment of shares in subsidiaries | –39 | |||
| Otherincome | 870 | 70 | 691 | 586 |
| TOTAL | 1,112 | 829 | 1,342 | 817 |
1) Reported separately in the Income Statementfor parent company.
2) See note 12 fortheGroup.
3) Items affecting comparability restated, see note 49.
Dividends
| Available-for-sale investments Investments in associates |
77 | 170 | 51 514 |
51 70 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividends from subsidiaries | 6,416 | 6,460 | ||
| TOTAL | 77 | 170 | 6,981 | 6,581 |
Note 7 continued Net otherincome
Gains less losses from investment securities
| Group | Parent company | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | |
| Available-for-sale financial assets – Equity instruments | 722 | 148 | 614 | 178 |
| Available-for-sale financial assets –Debt securities | 90 | 529 | ||
| Loans | 10 | 40 | ||
| Gains | 812 | 677 | 624 | 218 |
| Available-for-sale financial assets – Equity instruments | –93 | –131 | ||
| Available-for-sale financial assets –Debt securities | –7 | –14 | ||
| Loans | –508 | –122 | –1 | |
| Losses | –609 | –267 | –1 | |
| TOTAL | 203 | 410 | 624 | 217 |
| Otherincome | ||||
| Fair value adjustmentin hedge accounting | 205 | –260 | 792 | –323 |
| Operating resultfrom non-life insurance,run off | 283 | 158 | ||
| Otherincome | 382 | 172 | –102 | 909 |
| TOTAL | 870 | 70 | 690 | 586 |
| Fair value adjustmentin hedge accounting | ||||
| Fair value changes ofthe hedged items | 3,939 | 298 | 3,757 | 316 |
| Fair value changes ofthe hedging derivatives | –3,721 | –650 | –2,936 | –658 |
| Fair value hedges | 218 | –352 | 822 | –342 |
| Fair value changes ofthe hedged items | 75 | 261 | –52 | 135 |
| Fair value changes ofthe hedging derivatives | –79 | –182 | 33 | –129 |
| Fair value portfolio hedge ofinterestrate risk | –3 | 79 | –20 | 6 |
| Cash-flow hedges – ineffectiveness | –10 | 13 | –10 | 13 |
| TOTAL | 205 | –260 | 792 | –323 |
Fair value hedges and portfolio hedges
The Group hedges a portion ofits existing interestrate risk in financial assets, payments and financial liabilities with fixed interestrates against changes in fair value due to changes in the interestrates. Forthis purpose the Group uses interestrate swaps, cross-currency interestrate swaps and in some situa tions also options. The hedges are executed eitheritem by item or grouped by maturity.
ing with floating interestrates are expected to be amortised to profit orloss during the period 2018 to 2037.
Net investment hedges
The Group hedges the currency translation risk of netinvestments in foreign operations through currency borrowings and currency forwards. Borrowing in foreign currency at an amount of SEK 33,357m (39,001) and currency for wards at an amount of SEK 0m (2,507) were designated as hedges of net investments in foreign operations. Ineffectiveness in the hedges has been reported in Netfinancial income (note 6).
Cash flow hedges
The Group uses interestrate swaps to hedge future cash flows from deposits and lending with floating interestrates. Interestflows from deposits and lend-
8 Administrative expenses
| Group | Parent company | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 20161) | 2017 | 2016 | |
| Staff costs Other expenses |
–14,025 –6,947 |
–14,422 –6,619 |
–9,335 –4,918 |
–10,466 –4,573 |
| TOTAL | –20,972 | –21,041 | –14,252 | –15,039 |
1) Restructuring activities in 2016 reclassified to Items affecting comparability, see note 49.
9 Staff costs
| Group | Parent company | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 20163) | 2017 | 2016 | |
| Base salary Cash-based variable remuneration Long-term equity-based remuneration |
–8,073 –666 –616 |
–8,105 –684 –702 |
–5,431 –428 –462 |
–5,402 –541 –637 |
| Salaries and other compensations | –9,355 | –9,491 | –6,321 | –6,580 |
| Social charges Defined benefitretirement plans 1) Defined contribution retirement plans 1) Benefits and redundancies 2) Education and other staffrelated costs |
–2,543 –472 –881 –271 –502 |
–2,638 –313 –1,055 –444 –481 |
–1,861 –643 –169 –340 |
–1,955 –686 –766 –160 –319 |
| TOTAL | –14,025 | –14,422 | –9,335 | –10,466 |
1) Pension costs in theGroup are accounted for according to IAS 19 Employee benefits. Pension costs in Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken are calculated in accordance with theAct on Safeguarding PensionsObligations and the Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority's regulations. Non-recurring costs of SEK 196m (172m) for early retirement have been charged to the pension funds ofthe bank.
2) Includes costs forredundancies of SEK 179m (350) fortheGroup and SEK 126m(113) forthe parent company.
3) Restructuring activities in 2016 reclassified to Items affecting comparability, see note 49.
9a Remuneration
Presented in note 9a is the statement ofremuneration forthe Consolidated situation and significant units within the Group according to Regulation on prudentialrequirements for creditinstitutions and investmentfirms. In the SEB
Group 989 (1,167) positions are defined as Identified Staff. SEB has chosen to include the remuneration also in the insurance operations that are not part of the SEB consolidated situation but part ofthe SEB Group.
Remuneration by division 5)
| Group | Parent company | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed1) | Variable1) | Fixed1) | Variable1) | ||||||||
| 2017 | Remuneration | FTEs | Remuneration | FTEs | Remuneration | FTEs | Remuneration | FTEs | |||
| Large Corporates & Financial Institutions | –2,511 | 2,049 | –613 | 1,979 | –1,994 | 1,707 | –565 | 1,637 | |||
| Corporate & Private Customers | –2,375 | 3,531 | –153 | 3,521 | –1,654 | 2,818 | –121 | 2,808 | |||
| Baltic | –481 | 2,431 | –61 | 2,431 | |||||||
| Life & Investment Management | –1,120 | 1,478 | –103 | 1,458 | |||||||
| Other 2) | –4,532 | 5,457 | –352 | 5,432 | –2,595 | 4,182 | –204 | 4,084 | |||
| TOTAL | –11,019 | 14,946 | –1,282 | 14,821 | –6,243 | 8,707 | –890 | 8,529 | |||
| whereof collective variable pay 3) |
–546 | 14,821 | |||||||||
| 2016 | |||||||||||
| Large Corporates & Financial Institutions | –2,658 | 2,134 | –688 | 2,009 | –1,990 | 1,689 | –625 | 1,620 | |||
| Corporate & Private Customers | –2,353 | 3,667 | –192 | 3,647 | –1,665 | 2,920 | –152 | 2,920 | |||
| Baltic | –502 | 2,565 | –64 | 2,565 | |||||||
| Life & Investment Management | –1,115 | 1,468 | –108 | 1,432 | |||||||
| Other 2) | –3,429 | 5,445 | –334 | 4,663 | –3,359 | 4,147 | –401 | 3,517 | |||
| TOTAL | –10,057 | 15,279 | –1,386 | 14,316 | –7,014 | 8,756 | –1,178 | 8,057 | |||
| whereof collective variable pay 3) |
–573 | 14,316 |
| SEBAG,Germany | SEB PankAS, Estonia | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed 1) | Variable1) | Fixed 1) | Variable1) | |||||||
| 2017 | Remuneration | FTEs | Remuneration | FTEs | Remuneration | FTEs | Remuneration | FTEs | ||
| Large Corporates & Financial Institutions | –304 | 240 | –33 | 240 | ||||||
| Baltic | –150 | 725 | –20 | 725 | ||||||
| Other4) | –1,523 | 220 | –13 | 220 | –88 | 316 | –11 | 316 | ||
| TOTAL | –1,827 | 460 | –46 | 460 | –238 | 1,041 | –31 | 1,041 | ||
| 2016 | ||||||||||
| Large Corporates & Financial Institutions | –509 | 323 | –46 | 303 | ||||||
| Baltic | –150 | 741 | –18 | 734 | ||||||
| Other4) | –378 | 250 | –15 | 199 | –79 | 308 | –16 | 284 | ||
| TOTAL | –887 | 573 | –61 | 502 | –229 | 1,049 | –34 | 1,018 |
Note 9a continued Remuneration
| SEB BankaAS, Latvia | SEB bankasAB, Lithuania | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed 1) | Variable1) | Fixed 1) | Variable1) | ||||||
| 2017 | Remuneration | FTEs | Remuneration | FTEs | Remuneration | FTEs | Remuneration | FTEs | |
| Baltic Other4) |
–123 –56 |
640 246 |
–16 –6 |
640 246 |
–186 –89 |
1,024 373 |
–24 –8 |
1,024 373 |
|
| TOTAL | –179 | 886 | –22 | 886 | –275 | 1,397 | –32 | 1,397 | |
| 2016 | |||||||||
| Baltic Other4) |
–132 –60 |
691 260 |
–16 –9 |
679 234 |
–193 –78 |
1,085 366 |
–27 –12 |
1,076 328 |
|
| TOTAL | –192 | 951 | –25 | 913 | –271 | 1,451 | –39 | 1,404 |
1)Variable pay is defined as short-termcash-based remuneration and long-termequity-based remuneration.All otherremuneration is reported as fixed remuneration and includes: base pay, pensions, severance pay,fees and benefits such as e.g. company car and domestic services, in accordancewith FFFS 2011:1. The reported remuneration does notinclude social charges.
2) Including Life & Investment Management and Baltic in the parent company.
3) Share Savings Programme and collective short-term and long-term remuneration. Collective short-term and long-termremuneration compared to expected outcome is reported in Other.
4) Including Life & Investment Managementin Baltic countries. In Lithuania also Large Corporates & Financial Institutions are included.
5) Including Items affecting comparability, see note 49.
Remuneration by category7)
| Group | Parent company | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Remuneration | FTEs | Remuneration | FTEs | ||||||||||||
| 2017 | Identified Staff 6) |
Other employees |
Total | Identified Staff 6) |
Other employees |
Total | Identified Staff 6) |
Other employees |
Total | Identified Staff 6) |
Other employees |
Total | |||
| Fixed remuneration 1) | –1,140 | –9,879 –11,019 | 989 | 13,957 14,946 | –617 | –5,626 –6,243 | 585 | 8,122 | 8,707 | ||||||
| Variable pay 1) |
–334 | –948 | –1,282 | 554 | 14,267 14,821 | –166 | –724 | –890 | 311 | 8,218 | 8,529 | ||||
| whereof: | |||||||||||||||
| Short-term cash-based | –142 | –524 | –666 | –64 | –364 | –428 | |||||||||
| Long-termequity-based2) | –192 | –424 | –616 | –102 | –360 | –462 | |||||||||
| Deferred variable pay 3) |
–218 | –398 | –616 | –114 | –348 | –462 | |||||||||
| Accrued and paid | |||||||||||||||
| remuneration4) | –1,490 | –9,936 –11,426 | –785 | –6,350 –7,135 | |||||||||||
| Severance pay 5) |
–622 | 547 | –140 | 191 | |||||||||||
| Agreed not yet paid | |||||||||||||||
| severance pay | –609 | 362 | –147 | 170 | |||||||||||
| Highest single amount | –2 | –2 |
| 2016 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Fixed remuneration 1) | –1,173 | –8,884 –10,057 | 1,080 | 14,199 15,279 | –988 | –6,026 –7,014 | 788 | 7,968 8,756 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable pay 1) |
–373 | –1,013 | –1,386 | 788 | 13,528 14,316 | –313 | –865 –1,178 | 487 | 7,570 8,057 |
|
| whereof: | ||||||||||
| Short-term cash-based | –167 | –517 | –684 | –121 | –420 –541 |
|||||
| Long-termequity-based2) | –206 | –496 | –702 | –192 | –445 –637 |
|||||
| Deferred variable pay 3) |
–219 | –495 | –192 | –445 –637 |
||||||
| Accrued and paid | ||||||||||
| remuneration4) | –1,619 | –9,897 | –1,251 | –6,998 –8,249 | ||||||
| Severance pay 5) |
–498 | 546 | –122 | 130 | ||||||
| Agreed not yet paid | ||||||||||
| severance pay | –436 | 266 | –96 | 105 | ||||||
| Highest single amount | –7 | –3 |
| SEBAG,Germany | SEB PankAS, Estonia | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Remuneration | FTEs | Remuneration | FTEs | |||||||||
| 2017 | Identified Staff 6) |
Other employees |
Total | Identified Staff 6) |
Other employees |
Total | Identified Staff 6) |
Other employees |
Total | Identified Staff 6) |
Other employees |
Total |
| Fixed remuneration 1) Variable pay 1) whereof: |
–70 –16 |
–1,757 –30 |
–1,827 –46 |
53 29 |
407 431 |
460 460 |
–11 –2 |
–227 –29 |
–238 –31 |
16 6 |
1,025 1,035 |
1,041 1,041 |
| Short-term cash-based Long-termequity-based 2) Deferred variable pay 3) Accrued and paid |
–8 –8 –9 |
–4 –26 –26 |
–12 –34 –35 |
–2 –2 |
–15 –14 –14 |
–15 –16 –16 |
||||||
| remuneration4) Severance pay 5) |
–86 | –941 | –1,027 –429 |
157 | –13 | –256 | –269 –1 |
20 | ||||
| 2016 | ||||||||||||
| Fixed remuneration 1) Variable pay 1) whereof: Short-term cash-based Long-termequity-based 2) Deferred variable pay 3) |
–90 –18 –9 –9 –9 |
–797 –43 –13 –30 –30 |
–887 –61 –22 –39 –39 |
71 37 |
502 465 |
573 502 |
–12 –1 –1 –1 |
–217 –33 –16 –17 –17 |
–229 –34 –16 –18 –18 |
15 6 |
1,034 1,012 |
1,049 1,018 |
| Accrued and paid remuneration4) Severance pay 5) |
–112 | –840 | –952 –307 |
114 | –13 | –250 | –263 –3 |
42 |
Note 9a continued Remuneration
| SEB BankaAS, Latvia | SEB bankasAB, Lithuania | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Remuneration | FTEs | Remuneration | FTEs | ||||||||||
| 2017 | Identified Staff 6) |
Other employees |
Total | Identified Staff 6) |
Other employees |
Total | Identified Staff 6) |
Other employees |
Total | Identified Staff 6) |
Other employ- ees |
Total | |
| Fixed remuneration1) | –8 | –171 | –179 | 15 | 871 | 886 | –14 | –261 | –275 | 13 | 1,384 | 1,397 | |
| Variable pay 1) whereof: |
–1 | –21 | –22 | 9 | 877 | 886 | –3 | –29 | –32 | 4 | 1,393 | 1,397 | |
| Short-term cash-based | –9 | –9 | –13 | –13 | |||||||||
| Long-term equity-based 2) | –1 | –12 | –13 | –3 | –16 | –19 | |||||||
| Deferred variable pay 3) |
–1 | –12 | –13 | –3 | –16 | –19 | |||||||
| Accrued and paid | |||||||||||||
| remuneration 4) | –9 | –192 | –201 | –17 | –290 | –307 | |||||||
| Severance pay 5) |
–4 | 72 | –8 | 58 | |||||||||
| 2016 | |||||||||||||
| Fixed remuneration 1) | –16 | –176 | –192 | 29 | 922 | 951 | –17 | –254 | –271 | 23 | 1,428 | 1,451 | |
| Variable pay 1) whereof: |
–2 | –23 | –25 | 13 | 900 | 913 | –3 | –36 | –39 | 12 | 1,392 | 1,404 | |
| Short-term cash-based | –11 | –11 | –17 | –17 | |||||||||
| Long-term equity-based 2) | –2 | –12 | –14 | –3 | –19 | –22 | |||||||
| Deferred variable pay 3) |
–2 | –12 | –14 | –3 | –19 | –22 | |||||||
| Accrued and paid | |||||||||||||
| remuneration 4) | –18 | –199 | –217 | –20 | –290 | –310 | |||||||
| Severance pay 5) |
–2 | 53 | –15 | 111 |
1)Variable pay is defined as short-term cash-based remuneration and long-termequity-based remuneration.All otherremuneration is reported as fixed remuneration and includes: base pay, pensions, severance pay,fees and benefits such as e.g. company car and domestic services, in accordance with FFFS 2011:1. The reported remuneration does notinclude social charges.
2) Long-term equity based remuneration encompasses four different programmes; a Share Savings Programme andAll Employee Programme and also a Share Matching Programme and a ShareDeferral Programme for a selected group of key employees.
3) The deferred variable pay is locked the first year. Short-term cash-based remuneration can thereafter be paid pro rata overthree orfive years after a possible risk adjustment. Long-term equity-based programmes are locked for a minimum ofthree years.
4) InAccrued and paid remuneration amounts paid within the first quarter afterthe accrual is included.Deferred variable pay has been subjectto risk adjustment.
5) The amount also includes sign-on.
6) Employees with material impact on SEB's risk profile, in accordance with FFFS 2011:1.
7) Including Items affecting comparability, see note 49.
Loans to Executives
| Group | Parent company | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | ||
| ManagingDirectors andDeputy ManagingDirectors 1) | 113 | 94 | 27 | 20 | |
| Boards ofDirectors 2) | 426 | 407 | 111 | 120 | |
| TOTAL | 539 | 501 | 138 | 140 |
1) Comprises current President andDeputy Presidentin the parent company and ManagingDirectors andDeputy ManagingDirectors in subsidiaries. Total number of executives was 47 (53) of which 14 (12) female.
2) Comprises current Board members and their substitutes in the parent company and subsidiaries. Total number of persons was 156 (181) of which 43 (55) female.
Pension commitments to Executives
| Pension disbursements made | 112 | 136 | 45 | 64 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Change in commitments | 48 | 56 | 19 | 20 |
| Commitments at year-end | 1,839 | 1,871 | 870 | 848 |
The above commitments are covered by the bank's pensions funds orthrough bank-owned endowment assurance schemes. They include active and retired Presidents and vice Presidents in the parent company and Managing directors
and Deputy Managing directors in subsidiaries, in total 115 persons (118).
9b Pensions
Retirement benefit obligations
The Group has established pension schemes in the countries where business is performed. There are both defined benefit plans and defined contribution plans. The major pension schemes are final salary defined benefit plans and are funded. The defined benefit plan in Sweden is closed to new employees and a defined contribution plan was established during 2013. The defined contribution plans follow the local regulations in each country. Multiemployer defined benefit plans exist for employees in some parts of the Group. These plans are accounted for as defined contribution plans since sufficient informa tion of SEB's share of the liability/asset and cost is not available.
Defined benefit plans
The major defined benefit plans exist in Sweden and Germany and cover most employees in these countries. Independent actuarial calculations according to the Projected Unit Credit Method (PUCM) are performed quarterly to decide the value of the defined benefit obligation. The benefits covered include retirement benefits, disability, death and survivor pensions according to the respective countries' collective agreements. The plan assets are kept separate in specific pension foundations. In case of a deficit in the pension obligation according to local rules SEB is obliged to meet this with contribution to the foundation or insure a deficit. The asset allocation is determined to meet the various risks in the pension obligations and is decided by the board/trustees in the pension foundations. The assets are booked at market value. The pension and interest costs are presented in Staff costs.
Defined contribution plans
Defined contribution plans exist both in Sweden and abroad. In Sweden a smal ler part of the closed collective retirement agreement is defined contribution based. Over a certain salary level the employees could also choose to leave the defined benefit plan and replace it by a defined contribution plan. The current plan for new employees is fully contribution based. Most other countries have defined contribution plans except for the Baltic countries where the company to a limited extent contributes to the employees retirement. The defined con tribution plans are not recognised in the balance sheet but accounted for as an expense among Staff costs.
DEFINEDBENEFIT PLANS IN SEBGROUP
| 2017 | 2016 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net amountrecognised in the Balance sheet | Sweden1) | Foreign 1) |
Group 1) |
Sweden1) | Foreign 1) |
Group 1) |
|
| Defined benefit obligation atthe beginning ofthe year | 23,287 | 5,794 | 29,081 | 19,693 | 5,366 | 25,059 | |
| Curtailment, acquisitions and reclassification2) | 891 | 891 | |||||
| Service costs | 509 | 39 | 548 | 442 | 38 | 480 | |
| Interest costs | 556 | 95 | 651 | 606 | 127 | 733 | |
| Benefits paid | –735 | –321 | –1,056 | –691 | –277 | –968 | |
| Exchange differences | 177 | 177 | 153 | 153 | |||
| Remeasurements of pension obligation | 755 | –227 | 528 | 3,237 | 387 | 3,624 | |
| Defined benefit obligation atthe end ofthe year | 24,372 | 6,448 | 30,820 | 23,287 | 5,794 | 29,081 | |
| Fair value of plan assets atthe beginning ofthe year | 27,201 | 5,076 | 32,277 | 25,252 | 4,982 | 30,234 | |
| Curtailment, acquisitions and reclassification | 37 | 37 | |||||
| Calculated interest on plan assets | 645 | 85 | 730 | 783 | 118 | 901 | |
| Benefits paid/contributions | –686 | –242 | –928 | –277 | –277 | ||
| Exchange differences | 140 | 140 | 199 | 199 | |||
| Valuation gains (losses) on plan assets | 2,492 | 64 | 2,556 | 1,166 | 17 | 1,183 | |
| Fair value of plan assets atthe end ofthe year | 29,652 | 5,123 | 34,775 | 27,201 | 5,076 | 32,277 | |
| Change in the net assets or netliabilities | |||||||
| Defined benefit obligation atthe beginning ofthe year | 3,914 | –718 | 3,196 | 5,559 | –384 | 5,175 | |
| Curtailment, acquisitions and reclassification | –891 | –891 | 37 | 37 | |||
| Total expense in staff costs | –420 | –49 | –469 | –265 | –47 | –312 | |
| Pension paid | 735 | 321 | 1,056 | 691 | 277 | 968 | |
| Benefits paid/contributions | –686 | –242 | –928 | –277 | –277 | ||
| Exchange differences | –37 | –37 | 46 | 46 | |||
| Remeasurements | 1,737 | 291 | 2,028 | –2,071 | –370 | –2,441 | |
| NETAMOUNTRECOGNISEDIN THE BALANCE SHEET | 5,280 | –1,325 | 3,955 | 3,914 | –718 | 3,196 |
1) The net defined benefit obligation is recognised in the balance sheet either as an asset orliability depending on the situation for each legal entity.
2) In 2017 an agreement was signed to transfer most part ofthe pension obligations underthe defined benefit plan in SEBAGtoVersicherungsverein des Bankgewerbes a.G(BVV). In connection with the signing the obligation was revaluated to the value atthe transferin 2018, which resulted in a value change of SEK 891m.
In 2017 a contribution of SEK 39m (38) was paid to the German pension foundation. Contribution to the foundations cannot be ruled outin 2018.
Note 9b continued Pensions
Principal actuarial assumptions used
| 2017 | 2016 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sweden | Foreign | Sweden | Foreign | ||
| Discountrate | 2.2% | 1.9% | 2.4% | 1.7% | |
| Inflation rate | 1.5% | 1.8% | 1.5% | 1.8% | |
| Expected rate of salary increase | 3.5% | 2.5% | 3.5% | 2.5% | |
| Expected rate ofincrease in the income basis amount | 3.0% | 3.0% |
The discountrate is based set on high-quality corporate bonds in a deep mar ket, in Sweden covered bonds which are atleast AAA-rated. An extrapolation ofthe maturity ofthe covered bonds is made based on government bonds and checked against swaps. This extrapolated maturity is in line with the estimated maturity of obligations for post-employment benefits. Life expectancy assumptions in Sweden for 2016 are established by the Actuarial Research Board (FTN) and are based on DUS14 for white-collar workers. 2015 the Swedish life expectancy assumptions followed the insurance supervisory authority (FFFS 2007:31) regulations which are based on DUS06 forthe entire population. In Germany the Heubeck Sterbetafeln is used. Weighted average duration forthe obligation is 23 years in Sweden and 14 years in Germany.
A decrease ofthe discountrate for Sweden of 0.5 per cent would imply an increase ofthe Swedish pension obligation by SEK 2,404m while the same change in the inflation assumption for Sweden would have the opposite effect and decrease the obligation by SEK 1,753m. An increase ofthe discountrate by same ratio would reduce the obligation with SEK 2,077m and an increased inflation rate of 0.5 per cent gives an increased obligation of SEK 2,043m. A decrease in assumption for expected salary increase in Sweden of 0.5 per cent would have a positive effect on the obligation by SEK 314m an increase would have a negative effect of SEK 373m.
The obligation in Germany would increase by SEK 432m ifthe discountrate was reduced by 0.5 per cent. An increase by the same percentage would decrease the obligation by SEK 384m. Ifthe inflation assumption for Germany increases by 0.25 per centthe pension obligation would increase by SEK 73m and corresponding decrease would be SEK 70m at a lowerinflation assumption. A change in expected salary increases in Germany by 0.25 per cent would with a higherrate give an increase ofthe obligation by SEK 92m and with a lowerrate reduce the obligation by SEK 111m.
Allocation of plan assets
| 2017 | 2016 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sweden | Foreign | Group | Sweden | Foreign | Group | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 573 | 60 | 633 | 873 | 50 | 923 |
| Equity instruments with a quoted market price in an active market | 18,357 | 18,357 | 15,239 | 15,239 | ||
| Equity instruments notlisted in an active market | 5,068 | 1,063 | 6,131 | 6,520 | 887 | 7,407 |
| Debtinstruments with a quoted market price in an active market | 400 | 400 | 630 | 630 | ||
| Debtinstruments notlisted in an activemarket | 3,405 | 3,600 | 7,005 | 2,355 | 3,509 | 5,864 |
| Properties | 2,249 | 2,249 | 2,214 | 2,214 | ||
| TOTAL | 29,652 | 5,123 | 34,775 | 27,201 | 5,076 | 32,277 |
The pension plan assets include SEB shares with a fair value of SEK 1,209m (1,199). Buildings in Sweden are occupied by SEB.
Amounts recognised in Income statement
| 2017 | 2016 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sweden | Foreign | Group | Sweden | Foreign | Group | |
| Service costs Interest costs Calculated interest on plan assets |
–509 –556 645 |
–39 –95 85 |
–548 –651 730 |
–442 –606 783 |
–38 –127 118 |
–480 –733 901 |
| INCLUDEDIN STAFF COSTS | –420 | –49 | –469 | –265 | –47 | –312 |
Amounts recognised inOther comprehensive income
| Remeasurements of pension obligation | –755 | 227 | 292 –528 |
–3,237 | –387 | 440 –3,624 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| where of experience adjustments | 180 | 112 | 820 – |
262 | 178 | 237 3 – |
| where of due to changes in financial assumptions | –935 | 115 | –2,672 | –565 | 827 , – |
|
| where of due to changes in demographic assumptions | –827 | |||||
| Valuation gains (losses) on plan assets | 2,492 | 64 | 2,556 | 1,166 | 17 | 1,183 |
| Deferred tax pensions | –382 | –862 | –1,244 | 456 | 110 | 566 |
| INCLUDEDIN OTHERCOMPREHENSIVE INCOME | 1,355 | –571 | 784 | –1,615 | –260 | –1,875 |
DEFINEDCONTRIBUTION PLANS IN SEBGROUP
| 2017 | 2016 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net amountrecognised in Income statement | Sweden | Foreign | Group | Sweden | Foreign | Group |
| Expense in Staff costs including special salary tax | –943 | –239 | –1,182 | –812 | –243 | –1,055 |
Note 9b continued Pensions
DEFINEDBENEFIT PLANS IN SKANDINAVISKAENSKILDABANKEN
| Parent company | ||
|---|---|---|
| Net amountrecognised in the Balance sheet | 2017 | 2016 |
| Defined benefit obligation atthe beginning ofthe year | 23,417 | 22,699 |
| Imputed pensions premium | 299 | 330 |
| Interest costs and other changes | 1,017 | 902 |
| Early retirement | 196 | 172 |
| Pension disbursements | –716 | –686 |
| DEFINEDBENEFITOBLIGATION AT THE ENDOF THEYEAR | 24,213 | 23,417 |
| Fair value of plan assets atthe beginning ofthe year | 26,249 | 24,368 |
| Return on assets | 3,058 | 1,881 |
| Benefits paid | –686 | |
| FAIRVALUEOF PLAN ASSETSAT THE ENDOF THEYEAR | 28,621 | 26,249 |
The above defined benefit obligation is calculated according to Tryggande lagen. Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken consequently adopts the discountrate set by the Swedish FSA before year-end. The obligation is fully covered by assets in the pension foundation and is notincluded in the balance sheet. The assets in the foundation are mainly equity related SEK 22,606m
(20,998) and to a smaller extentinterest earning SEK 3,838m (3,115). The assets include SEB shares at a market value of SEK 1,167m (1,157) and buildings occupied by the company valued at SEK 2,170m (2,136). The return on assets was 12 per cent (8) before pension compensation.
Amounts recognised in Income statement
| Parent company | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2016 | ||
| Pension disbursements Compensation from pension foundations |
–716 686 |
–686 | |
| TOTAL | –30 | –686 | |
| Principal actuarial assumptions used | |||
| Gross interestrate Interestrate aftertax |
0.6% 0.5% |
0.7% 0.6% |
The actuarial calculations are based on salaries and pensions on the balance sheet date.
DEFINEDCONTRIBUTION PLANS IN SKANDINAVISKAENSKILDABANKEN
| Parent company | ||
|---|---|---|
| Net amountrecognised in Income statement | 2017 | 2016 |
| Expense in Staff costs including special salary tax | –643 | –766 |
Pension foundations
| Pension commitments | Market value of asset | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | |
| SEB-Stiftelsen, Skandinaviska Enskilda Bankens Pensionsstiftelse SEB KortAB:s Pensionsstiftelse |
24,213 959 |
23,417 916 |
28,621 1,031 |
26,249 952 |
| TOTAL | 25,172 | 24,333 | 29,652 | 27,201 |
9c Remuneration to the Board and the Group Executive Committee
Guidelines for remuneration
The guidelines forremuneration to the President and the other members of the Group Executive Committee (GEC) were prepared by the Board of Direc tors and its Remuneration and Human Resources Committee and approved by the Annual General Meeting 2017.
The remuneration structure forthe President and the other members of the GEC is in accordance with the remuneration policy forthe bank. No mem ber ofthe GEC has been entitled to cash based variable remuneration since 2009. Thus,the remuneration is based upon three main components; base
pay, equity based remuneration and pensions. Other benefits may also be included, such as company car and domestic services.
For more information, see page 60–61.
Identified staff
The President and all other members ofthe GEC are considered employees who have a material impact on SEB's risk profile according to the Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority regulations (FFFS 2011:1).
Remuneration to the Board 1), SEK
| 2017 | Base pay | Directors'fee | Benefits 2) |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chairman ofthe Board, Marcus Wallenberg | 3,640,000 | 3,640,000 | ||
| Other members ofthe Board 3) |
9,128,183 | 9,128,183 | ||
| President and CEO, Johan Torgeby (29 March–31December) | 7,125,000 | 112,318 | 7,237,318 | |
| President and CEO,Annika Falkengren (1 January–28 March) | 2,875,000 | 168,307 | 3,043,307 | |
| TOTAL | 10,000,000 | 12,768,183 | 280,625 | 23,048,808 |
| 2016 | ||||
| Chairman ofthe Board, Marcus Wallenberg | 3,520,000 | 3,520,000 | ||
| Other members ofthe Board 3) |
10,190,000 | 10,190,000 | ||
| President and CEO,Annika Falkengren | 11,500,000 | 1,425,479 | 12,925,479 | |
| TOTAL | 11,500,000 | 13,710,000 | 1,425,479 | 26,635,479 |
1) The number of Boardmembers decided by theAGM in 2017 is eleven (thirteen).
2) Includes benefits as domestic services and company car.
3)Directors'fee to the Board members on individual level is presented on page 54–57.
Member ofthe Board SaraÖhrvall has furtherinvoiced SEK 1,050,230 for consultancy services.
WhenAnnika Falkengren leftthe bank in July 2017, accrued holiday pay of SEK 7,366,637 was paid.
Remuneration to theGEC, SEK 1)
| Base pay | Benefits | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 49,224,511 | 1,853,522 | 51,078,033 |
| 2016 | 48,854,904 | 1,649,688 | 50,504,592 |
1)GEC excluding the President and CEO. The members partly differ between the years butin average eleven (eleven) members are included.Atthe end ofthe yearthe number of members were eleven (eleven).Additional members are notincluded.
Long-term equity programmes
Under the Share Deferral Programme members of the GEC may be granted an individual number of conditional share rights based on the fulfilment of pre-determined Group, business unit and individual target levels as outlined in SEB's business plan. The targets are set on an annual basis as a mix of the financial targets Return on Equity/Return on Business Equity and cost development and the non-financial target customer satisfaction among others. For GEC the initial allotment may not exceed 100 per cent of the base pay.
Ownership of 50 per cent of the share rights are transferred to the partici pant after a qualification period of three years, 50 per cent after a qualification period of five years. After each respective qualification period there is an additional holding period of one year after which the share rights can
be exercised. Each share right carries the right to receive one Class A-share in the bank. There is normally a requirement for vesting that the participant remains with SEB during the first three years, but some exemption apply. A further requirement for vesting is that the participant holds shares in SEB equal to a predetermined amount, for GEC equivalent to one year salary net of taxes, acquired no later than on a pro-rata basis during the initial three year vesting period.
The Share Matching Programme (SMP) 2014 vested in 2017 with 63% matching. GEC is not participating in the SMP 2012–2014 nor the All Employee Programme (AEP) except for outstanding rights earned before being member of GEC.
Long-term equity programmes (expensed amounts for ongoing programmes), SEK
| 2017 | Share matching |
Share deferral |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| President and CEO, Johan Torgeby Other members oftheGEC 1) |
1,522,952 15,489,205 |
1,522,952 15,489,205 |
|
| TOTAL | 17,012,157 | 17,012,157 | |
| 2016 | |||
| President and CEO,Annika Falkengren Other members oftheGEC 1) |
1,524,005 | 6,342,656 20,472,638 |
6,342,656 21,996,643 |
| TOTAL | 1,524,005 | 26,815,294 | 28,339,299 |
1)GEC excluding the President and CEO. The members partly differ between the years butin average eleven (eleven) members are included.Atthe end ofthe yearthe number of members were eleven (eleven).Additional members are notincluded.
Some oftheGEC members that have been appointed during the year have previously received rights in theAll Employee Programme and participated in the Share Savings Programme. The corresponding calculated costs and number of outstanding rights/shares are notincluded in the tables.
WhenAnnika Falkengren leftthe position as President and CEO,the outstanding not vested LTI programmes vested on a pro-rata basis. The corresponding costs forthe bank in 2017 was SEK 1,936,588.
Note 9c continued Remuneration to the Board and theGroup Executive Committee
Number outstanding by 2017-12-31
| Number outstanding | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| President and CEO Johan Torgeby |
Other members oftheGEC |
Total | First day of exercise |
Performance criteria | |
| 2012: Share matching rights | 22,107 | 28,713 | 50,820 | 20152) | final vesting 100%1) |
| 2013: Share matching rights | 34,129 | 60,682 | 94,811 | 20162) | final vesting 92% |
| 2014: Share matching rights | 17,493 | 24,604 | 42,097 | 20172) | final vesting 63% |
| 2012: Conditional share rights | 272,042 | 272,042 | 2016;20183) | – | |
| 2013: Conditional share rights | 201,942 | 201,942 | 2017;20193) | – | |
| 2014: Conditional share rights | 197,454 | 197,454 | 2018;20203) | – | |
| 2015: Conditional share rights | 11,572 | 232,636 | 244,208 | 2019;20213) | – |
| 2016: Conditional share rights | 39,476 | 327,647 | 367,123 | 2020;20223) | – |
| 2017: Conditional share rights | 29,942 | 216,784 | 246,726 | 2021;20233) |
1) Share Matching Programme 2012 vested in 2015 with 100% matching, since the programme had reached its cap the outcome after adjustmentrelated to the cap was 92%. 2)As soon as practically possible following the end ofthe performance period.
3) The qualification period ends afterthree orfive years respectively and are followed by a holding period of one year,thereafterthere is normally an exercise period ofthree years.
During the yearthe President and CEOhas exercised rights to a value of SEK 0 (6,398,251). The corresponding value fortheGEC excluding the Presidentis SEK 23,030,558 (8,181,695).
Pension and severance pay
The pension agreement ofthe Presidentis contribution-based and inviolable. The pension contribution is a fixed amount.
Termination of employment by the bank is subjectto a maximum 12-month period of notice and entitles to a severance pay of 12 months' salary.
As regards pension benefits and severance pay the following is applicable
to the members ofthe GEC excluding the President. The pension plans are inviolable and defined contribution-based exceptfor a portion in the collective agreement.
Termination of employment by the bank is subjectto a maximum 12-month period of notice and entitles to a severance pay of 12 months' salary.
Pension costs (service costs, interest costs and defined contribution premiums), SEK
| President and CEO, Johan Torgeby |
President and CEO, Annika Falkengren |
Other members of theGroup Executive committee1) |
Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2,625,000 | 1,250,000 | 16,917,548 | 20,792,548 |
| 2016 | 5,000,000 | 15,347,119 | 20,347,119 |
1)GEC excluding the President and CEO. The members partly differ between the years butin average eleven (eleven) members are included.Atthe end ofthe yearthe number of members were eleven (eleven).Additional members are notincluded.
Forinformation aboutrelated parties see note 27.
9d Share-based payments
Long-term equity-based programmes
| 2017 | All employee programme |
Share deferral programme |
Share matching programme1) | Share savings programme | Performance shares |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outstanding atthe beginning ofthe year | 10,142,015 | 14,046,597 | 2,957,797 | 1,274,019 | |
| Granted 2) | 2,991,591 | 5,520,433 | 1,011,633 | ||
| Forfeited 3) | –610,833 | –1,070,225 | –5,540 | ||
| Exercised 4) | –1,958,674 | –746,094 | –1,996,529 | –1,165,121 | |
| Expired | –108,898 | ||||
| OUTSTANDINGAT THE ENDOF THEYEAR | 10,564,099 | 17,750,711 | 1,967,361 | ||
| of which exercisable | 589,659 | 1,967,361 | |||
| 2016 | |||||
| Outstanding atthe beginning ofthe year | 7,807,319 | 8,614,625 | 3,044,974 | 2,120,938 | 2,135,647 |
| of which exercisable | 433,324 | 2,642,985 | 1,274,019 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OUTSTANDINGAT THE ENDOF THEYEAR | 10,142,015 | 14,046,597 | 2,957,797 | 1,274,019 | |
| Expired | –668 | –15,414 | |||
| Exercised 4) | –260,354 | –264,494 | –3,183,722 | –2,120,270 | –978,067 |
| Forfeited 3) | –541,269 | –451,853 | –25,963 | –1,773 | |
| Granted 2) | 3,136,319 | 6,148,319 | 3,122,508 | 133,626 | |
1) Numbers include investments done by participants, as well as allocated matching share rights.
2) Including compensation for dividend.
3) Weighted average exercise price forfeited SMP, SDP SEK 0.00 (0.00).
4)Weighted average exercise price exercised SMP, SDPSEK0.00(0.00) andPSPSEK10.00(10.00).Weighted average share price forPSP, SMPand SDPat exercise SEK104.09(80.85).
Note 9d continued Share-based payments
Total Long-term equity-based programmes
| Original no of holders3) 4) |
No ofissued (maximum outcome) |
No of outstanding 20174) 5) |
No of outstanding 20164) 5) |
A-share per option/ share |
Exercise price |
Validity | First date of exercise | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010: Performance shares | 698 | 18,900,000 | 1,274,019 | 1 | 10 | 2010–2017 | 20131) | |
| 2012: Share matching programme | 432 | 7,024,168 | 874,084 | 1,545,814 | 4 | 2012–2019 | 20152) | |
| 2013: Share matching programme | 213 | 3,485,088 | 702,408 | 1,097,171 | 4 | 2013–2020 | 20162) | |
| 2014: Share matching programme | 96 | 1,300,288 | 390,869 | 314,812 | 4 | 2014–2021 | 20172) | |
| 2012: Share deferral programme – equity settled | 86 | 1,199,504 | 854,226 | 1,019,822 | 1 | 2012–2021 | 2015/20173) | |
| 2013: Share deferral programme – equity settled | 263 | 1,361,861 | 1,126,673 | 1,457,480 | 1 | 2013–2022 | 2016/20183) | |
| 2014: Share deferral programme – equity settled | 622 | 1,909,849 | 1,993,157 | 1,912,528 | 1 | 2014–2023 | 2017/20193) | |
| 2015: Share deferral programme – equity settled | 816 | 2,603,843 | 2,478,718 | 2,546,169 | 1 | 2015–2024 | 2018/20203) | |
| 2015: Share deferral programme – cash settled | 513 | 1,717,150 | 1,622,652 | 1,674,045 | 2015–2021 | 2018/20203) | ||
| 2016: Share deferral programme – equity settled | 874 | 3,593,155 | 3,355,003 | 3,494,730 | 1 | 2016–2025 | 2019/20213) | |
| 2016: Share deferral programme – cash settled | 500 | 2,017,622 | 1,913,887 | 1,941,823 | 2016–2022 | 2019/20213) | ||
| 2017: Share deferral programme – equity settled6) | 1,373 | 4,439,824 | 4,210,294 | 1 | 2017–2026 | 2020/20223) | ||
| 2017: Share deferral programme – cash settled | 75 | 206,125 | 196,101 | 2017–2023 | 2020/20223) | |||
| 2013:All employee programme – equity settled | 8,347 | 1,255,838 | 1,171,517 | 1 | 2013–2016 | 2017 | ||
| 2013:All employee programme – cash settled | 5,358 | 532,184 | 435,600 | 2013–2016 | 2017 | |||
| 2014:All employee programme – equity settled | 8,709 | 1,786,471 | 1,599,693 | 1,684,487 | 1 | 2014–2017 | 2018 | |
| 2014:All employee programme – cash settled | 5,216 | 964,436 | 765,734 | 824,822 | 2014–2017 | 2018 | ||
| 2015:All employee programme – equity settled | 8,319 | 2,290,359 | 2,103,704 | 2,221,704 | 1 | 2015–2018 | 2019 | |
| 2015:All employee programme – cash settled | 6,745 | 1,220,463 | 1,041,755 | 1,138,059 | 2015–2018 | 2019 | ||
| 2016:All employee programme – equity settled | 8,209 | 1,731,922 | 1,640,581 | 1,731,922 | 1 | 2016–2019 | 2020 | |
| 2016:All employee programme – cash settled | 6,517 | 933,905 | 874,726 | 933,905 | 2016–2019 | 2020 | ||
| 2017:All employee programme – equity settled | 7,954 | 1,613,740 | 1,613,740 | 1 | 2017–2020 | 2021 | ||
| 2017:All employee programme – cash settled | 6,867 | 924,166 | 924,166 | 2017–2020 | 2021 | |||
TOTAL 76,281,181 30,282,171 28,420,429
1)As soon as practically possible following the end ofthe performance period,the establishing ofthe final outcome and registration ofthe final number of Performance shares in Equate plus.
2)As soon as practically possible following the end ofthe performance period,the establishing ofthe outcome of number of Matching Shares and the allocation oftheA-shares and, if applicable,the Matching Shares.
3)As soon as possible following the end ofthe performance period the outcome is established. Forthe equity-settled programmes the ownership ofthe performance shares is transferred upon registration, butthe shares are withheld for one additional year. Cash-settled programmes are paid outin connection with the following payrollrun. 4) In total approximately 11,000 individuals (10,900) participated in any ofthe programmes,All Employee Programme excluded.
5) Including additional deferralrights for dividend compensation.
6) The exercise period forGEC members is extended during the period thatthey areGEC members.
Long-term equity-based programmes
TheAnnualGeneralmeeting 2017 decided on two Long-termequity based pro grammes, one Share Deferral Programme and one All Employee Programme. The first Share Deferral Programme was introduced in 2012 fortheGroup
Executive Committee and certain other executive managers and key employees with critical competences. The participants are granted an individual num ber of conditional share rights based on pre-determined Group, division/business unit and individualtargetlevels, both financial (Return on Equity/Return on Business Equity and cost development) and non-financial (customer satis faction), set on an annual basis.
For GEC members and other senior executives 50 per cent ofthe share rights ownership is transferred after a qualification period ofthree years and 50 per cent after a qualification period offive years. For other participants the qualification period is three years. The requirementfor vesting is normally thatthe participantremains with SEB during the firstthree years and thatthe participant holds shares in SEB equalto a predetermined amount, acquired no laterthan on a pro-rata basis during the initialthree year period. After each respective qualification period there is an additional holding period of one year after which the share rights can be exercised, normally during a period ofthree years. Each share right carries the rightto receive one Class A-share in the bank. In countries mainly outside Europe the participants receives so called phantom shares that gives the rightto receive cash adjusted fortotal shareholderreturn ofthe SEB A-share atthe end ofthe holding period.
The holders are compensated for dividends to the shareholders. Thus,the number of share rights will be recalculated, afterthe Annual General Meeting each year,taking the dividend into account. The share rights are not securities that can be sold, pledged ortransferred to others. However, an estimated value per share right has been calculated for 2017 to SEK 83 (67) (based upon an average closing price of one SEB Class A-share atthe time of grant).
In 2013 an All Employee Programme was introduced for most employees, where 50 per cent ofthe outcome is paid in cash and 50 per centis deferred forthree years and paid in SEB A-shares. Deferrals will normally only be obtained underthe condition thatthe employee remains with SEB. In Sweden the deferred partis paid outin SEB A-shares, adjusted for dividends. In all other countries the deferred partis paid outin cash adjusted fortotal share holderreturn ofthe SEB A-share. The initial outcome is capped at a maximum amount, which was adjusted in 2016,for each geography and is based on the fulfilment of pre-determined Group targets outlined in SEB's business plan, both financial (Return on Equity and cost development) and non-financial (customer satisfaction). The outcome in 2017 year's programme was
56 per cent (56) ofthe maximum amount. In Sweden the maximum amount is SEK 75,000, up until 2015 it was SEK 55,000.
Previously allotted programmes
From 2005 to 2010 the programmes were based on performance shares. They all have a maximum term of seven years, a vesting period ofthree years and an exercise period offour years. The number of allotted performance shares that can be exercised depends on the development oftwo predetermined performance criteria of equal importance. All programmes are vested and the exercise period forthe 2010 years programme ended in 2017.
Between 2008 and 2012 a Share Savings Programme for all employees in selected countries has been run. In the Share Savings Programmes the partici pants saved a maximum offive per cent oftheir gross base salary during a twelve months period. Forthe savings amount, Class A-shares were pur chased at current stock exchange rate fourtimes a yearfollowing the publica tion ofthe bank's interim reports. Ifthe shares are retained by the employee forthree years and the employee remains with SEB,the employee receives one Class A-share for each retained share. All programmes are vested and the exercise period forthe 2012 years programme ends in 2017.
Between 2009 and 2014 a Share Matching Programme for a number of selected senior executives and other key employees has been run. The pro grammes are based on performance, have a vesting period ofthree years and are settled with SEB ClassA-shares.All programmes require own investment in SEB shares. The investment amountis pre-determined and capped for each participant.Afterthree years, if still employed,the participantreceives one ClassA-share for each invested share and a conditional number of performance based matching shares for each invested share. From 2012 the settlementis in the form of share rights with an exercise period offour years. The 2014 programme was closed in 2017 with 63 per cent matching.
In the 2014 years programme the number of performance based matching shares depend on the development oftwo pre-determined performance cri teria; measured as total shareholderreturn (TSR) in relation to the markets required return based on the interest of Swedish government 10 year bonds i.e. long-term risk free interestrate (LTIR),two thirds, and the total share holderreturn in relation to SEB's competitors, one third. Maximum outcome forthe participants is three performance based matching shares. The out come is also subjectto risk adjustment.
The holders are compensated for dividends to the shareholders during the exercise period. Thus,the number of share rights will be recalculated, afterthe Annual General Meeting each year during the exercise period,taking the dividend into account.
Matching rights are not securities that can be sold, pledged ortransferred to another party. However, an estimated value per matching right has been calculated for 2014 to SEK 65 and forthe performance based matching rights to SEK 39. Otherinputs to the options pricing model are; exercise price SEK 0; volatility 46 (based on historical values); expected dividend approximately 4 per cent;risk free interestrate 1.13 and expected early exercise of 3 per
9e Number of employees
cent due to staffturnover. In the value ofthe option the expected outcome ofthe performance criteria described above are taken into account.
The programme is subjectto a cap, ifthe share price atthe time of vesting has more than doubled the number of matching shares and performance based matching shares that are transferred to a participant will be reduced proportionately so thatthe value corresponds to the doubled share price capped value.
Further details of the outstanding programmes are found in the table above.
| Average number of employees | Group | Parent company | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Men | Women | Total | Men | Women | Total |
| Sweden | 3,957 | 4,097 | 8,053 | 3,393 | 3,476 | 6,869 |
| Norway | 242 | 160 | 402 | 199 | 101 | 300 |
| Denmark | 365 | 247 | 612 | 171 | 68 | 238 |
| Finland | 154 | 137 | 291 | 109 | 91 | 200 |
| Estonia | 293 | 920 | 1,212 | |||
| Latvia | 415 | 1,111 | 1,526 | 156 | 276 | 432 |
| Lithuania | 772 | 1,703 | 2,475 | 341 | 476 | 817 |
| Germany | 289 | 201 | 490 | |||
| Poland | 14 | 29 | 43 | 14 | 29 | 43 |
| Ukraine | 20 | 38 | 58 | |||
| China | 10 | 32 | 42 | 10 | 32 | 42 |
| Great Britain | 82 | 44 | 126 | 82 | 44 | 126 |
| Ireland | 54 | 71 | 124 | |||
| Luxembourg | 121 | 104 | 225 | |||
| Russia | 23 | 64 | 87 | |||
| Singapore | 34 | 72 | 106 | 31 | 63 | 94 |
| United States | 31 | 18 | 49 | 24 | 17 | 41 |
| Other countries1) | 16 | 13 | 28 | 16 | 13 | 28 |
| TOTAL | 6,889 | 9,057 | 15,946 | 4,546 | 4,686 | 9,232 |
| 2016 | ||||||
| Sweden | 4,046 | 4,175 | 8,221 | 3,542 | 3,568 | 7,110 |
| Norway | 259 | 167 | 426 | 206 | 97 | 303 |
| Denmark | 379 | 261 | 640 | 166 | 70 | 236 |
| Finland | 154 | 148 | 302 | 109 | 94 | 203 |
| Estonia | 305 | 928 | 1,233 | |||
| Latvia | 413 | 1,102 | 1,515 | 131 | 239 | 370 |
| Lithuania | 727 | 1,650 | 2,377 | 278 | 405 | 683 |
| Germany | 359 | 258 | 617 | 2 | 2 | |
| Poland | 17 | 38 | 55 | 14 | 30 | 44 |
| Ukraine | 22 | 40 | 62 | |||
| China | 12 | 33 | 45 | 12 | 33 | 45 |
| Great Britain | 93 | 49 | 142 | 94 | 49 | 143 |
| Ireland | 55 | 64 | 119 |
Luxembourg 123 106 229 Russia 24 67 91 Singapore 36 66 102 31 58 89 United States 33 20 53 24 18 42 Other countries1) 17 14 31 14 9 23 TOTAL 7,074 9,186 16,260 4,623 4,670 9,293
1) Brazil andHong Kong.
10 Other expenses
| Group | Parent company | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 20163) | 2017 | 2016 | |
| Costs for premises 1) | –1,644 | –1,568 | –1,260 | –1,133 |
| Data costs | –3,479 | –2,992 | –2,372 | –1,962 |
| Travel and entertainment | –387 | –387 | –277 | –278 |
| Consultants | –842 | –637 | –652 | –440 |
| Marketing | –301 | –339 | –144 | –161 |
| Information services | –549 | –549 | –476 | –470 |
| Other operating costs 2) | 254 | –147 | 264 | –129 |
| TOTAL | –6,947 | –6,619 | –4,918 | –4,573 |
| 1)Of which rental costs | –1,158 | –1,160 | –954 | –895 |
2) Net after deduction for capitalised costs, see also note 28.
3) Restructuring activities in 2016 reclassified to Items affecting comparability, see note 49.
Note 10 continued Other expenses
Fees and expense allowances to appointed auditors and auditfirms 1)
| Group | Parent company | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | |
| Audit assignment | –29 | –26 | –12 | –10 |
| Auditrelated services | –21 | –16 | –1 | –2 |
| Tax advisory | –12 | –10 | –5 | –8 |
| Other services | –4 | –3 | –2 | –3 |
| PricewaterhouseCoopers2) | –65 | –55 | –20 | –23 |
| Audit assignment | –1 | –1 | ||
| Tax advisory | –1 | –1 | ||
| Other services | –2 | –1 | ||
| Other auditfirms | –3 | –3 | ||
| TOTAL | –69 | –58 | –20 | –23 |
1) The parent company includes the foreign branches.
2) Fees to PricewaterhouseCoopersAB from companies in the SEB group amountto SEK 22.9m.Out ofthis amount, SEK 15.8m is related to the audit and SEK 7.1mto other services.
Audit assignmentis defined as the audit of annualfinancial statements,the administration ofthe Board of Directors and the President, othertasks resting upon the auditor as well as consulting and other assistance, which have been initiated by the findings in performing audit work orimplementation of such tasks. The auditrelated services include quarterly reviews,regulatory reporting and services in connection with issuing of certificates and opinions. Tax advisory include general expatriate services and othertax services work. Other services include consultation on financial accounting, services related to mergers and acquisitions activities, operational effectiveness and assessments ofinternal control.
11 Depreciation, amortisation and impairment of tangible and intangible assets
| Group | Parent company | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 20162) | 2017 | 2016 | |
| Depreciation oftangible assets | –222 | –271 | –127 | –106 |
| Depreciation of equipmentleased to clients1) | –4,817 | –4,704 | ||
| Amortisation ofintangible assets | –607 | –489 | –462 | –410 |
| Impairment oftangible assets | –4 | –3 | ||
| Impairment ofintangible assets | –101 | –870 | ||
| Impairment of goodwill | –200 | |||
| Retirement and disposal ofintangible assets | –30 | –8 | –102 | –355 |
| TOTAL | –964 | –771 | –6,377 | –5,775 |
1) In theGroup Netincome from leases is classified as interestincome. In the parent company depreciation ofleased equipmentis reported asDepreciation, amortisation and impairment oftangible and intangible assets.
2) Restructuring activities and impairment of goodwill due to the implementation of a new customer-oriented organisation in 2016 reclassified to Items affecting comparability, see note 49.
12 Gains less losses tangible and intangible assets
| Group | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2016 | |
| Properties Othertangible assets |
62 8 |
94 16 |
| Gains | 70 | 110 |
| Properties Othertangible assets |
–229 –3 |
–254 –6 |
| Losses | –232 | –260 |
| TOTAL | –162 | –150 |
13 Net credit losses
| Group | Parent company | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | |
| Provisions: Net collective provisions forindividually assessed loans Net collective provisions for portfolio assessed loans Specific provisions Reversal of specific provisions no longerrequired Net provisions for contingentliabilities |
423 168 –1,309 760 –30 |
–218 260 –734 338 43 |
441 –12 –1,190 625 –47 |
–202 14 –407 102 21 |
| Net provisions | 12 | –311 | –183 | –472 |
| Write-offs: Total write-offs Reversal of specific provisions utilized for write-offs |
–1,367 318 |
–1,480 584 |
–797 180 |
–471 60 |
| Write-offs not previously provided for Recovered from previous write-offs |
–1,050 230 |
–896 214 |
–617 51 |
–411 94 |
| Net write-offs | –820 | –682 | –566 | –317 |
| TOTAL | –808 | –993 | –749 | –789 |
14 Appropriations
| Parent company | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2016 | ||
| Group contribution Accelerated tax depreciation |
1,554 332 |
732 1,705 |
|
| Appropriations | 1,885 | 2,437 | |
| TOTAL | 1,885 | 2,437 |
15 Taxes
| Group | Parent company | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Major components oftax expense | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 |
| Currenttax Deferred tax |
–4,554 –145 |
–4,052 –161 |
–3,633 | –2,877 |
| Tax for current year Currenttax for previous years |
–4,699 137 |
–4,213 –36 |
–3,633 43 |
–2,877 137 |
| INCOME TAXEXPENSE | –4,562 | –4,249 | –3,590 | –2,740 |
Relationship between tax expenses and accounting profit
| Net profit | 16,244 | 10,618 | 17,811 | 14,378 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income tax expense | 4,562 | 4,249 | 3,590 | 2,740 |
| Accounting profit before tax | 20,806 | 14,867 | 21,401 | 17,118 |
| Currenttax at Swedish statutory rate of 22.0 per cent | –4,577 | –3,271 | –4,708 | –3,766 |
| Tax effectrelating to othertax rates in otherjurisdictions | 429 | 246 | ||
| Tax effectrelating to nottax deductible expenses | –641 | –1,422 | –788 | –990 |
| Tax effectrelating to non-taxable income | 519 | 464 | 1,863 | 1,879 |
| Tax effectrelating to a previously recognised tax loss, | ||||
| tax credit ortemporary difference | 156 | 476 | ||
| Tax effectrelating to a previously unrecognised tax loss, | ||||
| tax credit ortemporary difference | –440 | –545 | ||
| Currenttax | –4,554 | –4,052 | –3,633 | –2,877 |
| Tax effectrelating to origin and reversal oftax losses, | ||||
| tax credits and temporary differences | –156 | –475 | ||
| Tax effectrelating to a previously unrecognised tax loss, | ||||
| tax credit ortemporary difference | 11 | 314 | ||
| Deferred tax | –145 | –161 | ||
| Currenttax for previous years | 137 | –36 | 43 | 137 |
| INCOME TAXEXPENSE 1) | –4,562 | –4,249 | –3,590 | –2,740 |
1) Total income tax expense was SEK 4,562m (4,249). The effective tax rate forthe year was 21.9 per cent (28.5). Excluding the items that affect comparability,the effective tax rate was 21 per cent (21). This was in line with SEB's expected tax rate.
Deferred tax income and expense recognised in income statement
| Accelerated tax depreciation | –30 | 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Pension plan assets, net | 178 | –163 |
| Tax losses carry forwards | –133 | –322 |
| Othertemporary differences | –161 | 24 |
| TOTAL | –145 | –161 |
Deferred tax assets and liabilities, where the change is not reported as a change in deferred tax, amount to SEK –418m (125) and is mainly explained by reclassification of SEB Pension in Denmark to held for sale.
Note 15 continued Taxes
| Currenttax assets | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | Parent company | |||
| 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | |
| Other | 5,252 | 5,976 | 1,999 | 2,990 |
| Recognised in profit and loss | 5,252 | 5,976 | 1,999 | 2,990 |
| Other | 2 | 2 | ||
| Recognised in Shareholders' equity | 2 | 2 | ||
| TOTAL | 5,255 | 5,978 | 1,999 | 2,990 |
Deferred tax assets
| 271 |
|---|
| 480 |
| 853 |
| –4 |
| 849 |
| 1,329 |
1) Temporary differences are differences between the carrying amount of an asset orliability in the balance sheet and its tax base. Taxable temporary differences give rise to deferred tax assets and liabilities.
Deferred tax assets on tax losses carried forward relates mainly to the Baltic countries and are based on SEB's assessment offuture earnings in respective entity.
Tax losses carried forward in the SEB Group for which the tax assets are notrecognised in the balance sheet amountto SEK 4,662m (4,537) gross.
These are notrecognised due to the uncertainty in the possibility to use them. This includes losses where the amount can only be used fortrade tax. The potentialtax asset notrecognised is SEK 919m (920).
All losses carried forward except SEK 122m in Latvia due 2023, are without time limit.
Currenttax liabilities
| Group | Parent company | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | |
| Other | 1,463 | 2,184 | 684 | 694 |
| Recognised in profit and loss | 1,463 | 2,184 | 684 | 694 |
| Group contributions | 161 | |||
| Recognised in Shareholders' equity | 161 | |||
| TOTAL | 1,463 | 2,184 | 684 | 855 |
Deferred tax liabilities
| Accelerated tax depreciation Unrealised profits in financial assets atfair value Pension plan assets and obligations, net Othertemporary differences 1) |
6,388 –211 144 |
6,525 23 –32 293 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recognised in profit and loss | 6,321 | 6,809 | ||
| Pension plan assets and obligations, net Unrealised profits in cash flow hedges Unrealised profits in available-for-sale financial assets |
1,372 336 49 |
44 1,526 95 |
336 | 677 |
| Recognised in Shareholders' equity | 1,758 | 1,665 | 336 | 677 |
| TOTAL | 8,079 | 8,474 | 336 | 677 |
1) Temporary differences are differences between the carrying amount of an asset orliability in the balance sheet and its tax base. Taxable temporary differences give rise to deferred tax assets and liabilities.
Until and including 2017, no income tax is paid in Estonia unless profitis dis tributed as dividend. No deferred tax liability is recognised related to possible future tax costs on dividends from Estonia. The tax rate applicable to divi-
dends in Estonia is 20 per cent (20).
16 Earnings per share
| Group | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2016 | |
| Net profit attributable to shareholders, SEKm Weighted average number of shares, millions Basic earnings per share, SEK |
16,244 2,168 7.49 |
10,618 2,178 4.88 |
| Net profit attributable to shareholders, SEKm Weighted average number of diluted shares, millions Diluted earnings per share, SEK |
16,244 2,178 7.46 |
10,618 2,188 4.85 |
| Dilution1) | ||
| Weighted average number of shares, millions Adjustmentfor diluted weighted average number of |
2,168 | 2,178 |
| additional ClassA-shares, millions Weighted average number of diluted shares, millions |
10 2,178 |
10 2,188 |
1) Calculated dilution based on the estimated economic value ofthe long-term incentive programmes.
17 Risk disclosures
SEB's profitability is directly dependent upon its ability to evaluate, manage and price the risks encountered, while maintaining an adequate capital and liquidity position to meet unforeseen events. Risk, liquidity and capital man agement are integral parts of SEB's long-term strategic and business planning processes.
17a Credit risk
Definition
Creditrisk is the risk ofloss due to the failure of an obligorto fulfil its obliga tions towards SEB. The definition also comprises counterparty risk derived from the trading operations, country risk, settlementrisk, and credit concentration risk.
The main risk in SEB is creditrisk, which arises in the lending and commitments to customers, including corporates,financial institutions, public sector entities and private individuals. This is referred to as the credit portfolio. SEB's total credit exposure consists ofthe credit portfolio as well as debtinstruments and repos.
Risk management
Credit policy and approval process
The main principle in SEB's credit policy is that all lending is based on credit analysis and is proportionate to the customer's cash flow and ability to repay. The customer shall be known by the bank and the purpose ofthe loan shall be fully understood.
A credit approval is based on an evaluation ofthe customer's creditworthiness and the type of credit. Relevantfactors include the customer's current and anticipated financial position and protection provided by covenants and collateral. A credit approvaltakes the proposed transaction into account as well as the customer's total business with the bank. The process differs depending on the type of customer (e.g.,retail, corporate orinstitutional),risk level, and size and type oftransaction. Independent and professional credit analysis is particularly importantforlarge corporate customers. For private individuals and small businesses,the credit approval is often based on credit scoring models. Every credit decision of significance requires approvalfrom an independent credit officer.
Credit decision-making is based on a hierarchical structure, with the Group Risk Committee being the highest credit granting body, subjectto limited exceptions. Below the Group Risk Committee,there are divisional credit com mittees and, in turn, local credit committees depending on the location ofthe customer, with small approval authorities for certain bank officers. The approval mandates for each level are set on a risk-adjusted basis using both quantitative and qualitative criteria.
SEB's credit policies reflectthe Group's approach to sustainability as described in the Corporate Sustainability Policy,the Environmental Policy, and the Credit Policy on Corporate Sustainability. Position statements on climate change, child labour, and access to fresh water, as well as a number ofindustry sector policies shall be considered in the credit granting process and are also used in customer dialogues. Environmental, social and governance risks shall be considered in the credit analysis.
Limits and monitoring
To manage the creditrisk forindividual customers or customer groups, a limitis established thatreflects the maximum exposure that SEB is willing Furtherinformation about SEB's risk, liquidity and capital managementis available on pages 44–49, notes 19–20 and in SEB's report under Pillar 3: Capital Adequacy and Risk Management Report (available on www.sebgroup.com).
to accept. Limits are also established fortotal exposure in countries in certain risk classes, certain customer segments and for settlementrisks in the trading operations.
SEB continuously reviews the quality ofits credit exposures. Alltotal limits and risk classes are reviewed atleast annually by a credit approval body (a credit committee consisting of atleasttwo bank officers as authorised by the Group's CreditInstruction, adopted by the Board). Weak orimpaired exposures are subjectto more frequentreviews. The objective is to identify credit exposures with an elevated risk ofloss at an early stage and to work together with the customertowards a solution that enables the customerto meetits financial obligations and SEB to avoid orlimit creditlosses.
Loans where the contractualterms have been amended in favour ofthe customer due to financial difficulties are referred to as forborne loans. For bearance measures range from amortisation holidays (the most common measure) to refinancing with new terms and debtforgiveness. Changes in contractualterms may be so significantthatthe loan can also be considered impaired. A relevant credit approval body shall approve the forbearance measures as well as the classification ofthe loan as being forborne or not. In its core markets, SEB maintains local workoutteams that are engaged in problem exposures. These are supported by a global workoutfunction with overall responsibility for managing problem exposures.
Impairment provisioning process
Provisions are made for probable creditlosses on individually assessed loans and for portfolio assessed loans. Loans to corporate,real estate and institu tional counterparties are primarily individually assessed and specific provi sions are made foridentified impaired loans (individually assessed impaired loans).
Loans that have not been deemed to be impaired on an individual basis and which have similar creditrisk characteristics are grouped together and assessed collectively forimpairment. Valuations ofloans to private individuals and small businesses are to a large extent made on a portfolio basis (port folio assessed loans). For a further description of the different categories of impaired loans,referto note 1 and note 19.
The new accounting standard, IFRS 9 Financial Instruments, is effective as of 1 January 2018. It entails a change of methodology forimpairment of financial instruments accounting in which loan loss allowances are based on an expected loss modelratherthan an incurred loss model.Forfurther description of the new accounting policy forimpairment,referto note 1a.
Risk mitigation
SEB reduces risk in its credit portfolio through a number of creditrisk mitigation techniques. The method used depends on its suitability forthe product and the customerin question, its legal enforceability, and on SEB's experience and capacity to manage and controlthe particulartechnique. The mostimpor tant creditrisk mitigation techniques are collateral pledges, guarantees and
netting agreements. The most common types of pledges are real estate,float ing charges and financial securities. Forlarge corporate customers, creditrisk is often mitigated by the use of covenants. In the trading operations, daily margin arrangements are frequently used to mitigate net open counterparty exposures at any pointin time.
Credit portfolio analysis and stress tests
The risk organisation regularly reviews and assesses the aggregate credit portfolio based on industry, geography, risk class, product type, size and other parameters. Risk concentrations in geographic and industry sectors as well as in large single names are thoroughly analysed, both in respect of direct and indirect exposures and in the form of collateral, guarantees and credit derivatives. As of year-end, the 20 largest corporate exposures (in cluding real estate management) corresponded to 89 per cent of the capital base (86). Stress tests of the credit portfolio, including reverse stress tests, are performed regularly as a part of SEB's annual internal capital adequacy assessment process. Specific analyses and stress tests of certain sectors or sub-portfolios are performed as required.
Risk measurement
Credit risk is measured for all exposures, both in the banking book and the trading book. An internal ratings-based (IRB) risk classification system approved by the regulator is used for the majority of the bank's portfolios and reflects the risk of default on payment obligations. SEB received appro val for a significant amendment of its risk classification system for the non retail portfolio in the parent company at the end of 2015 and for SEB AG in 2016. Approval for the Baltic subsidiaries is still pending.
The risk classification system contains specific rating tools and PD (probability of default) scales for significant non-retail portfolios. The portfolios are measured on a risk class scale of 1–16 for the larger and mid-sized counter parties, while the SME portfolios are measured on a scale of 1–12. Defaulted counterparties are given the highest risk class, and the three risk classes prior to default are defined as "watch list". For each risk class scale, SEB makes individual one-year, through-the-cycle probability of default estimates, which are based on more than 20 years of internal and external data.
For private individuals and small businesses, SEB uses credit scoring sys tems to estimate PD for the customer. To achieve greater accuracy, SEB uses
Credit exposure by industry
Total credit exposure comprises the Group's credit portfolio (loans, leasing agreements, contingentliabilities and counterparty risks arising from deriva tive contracts),repos and debtinstruments. Exposures are presented before reserves. Interestrate and foreign exchange derivatives and repos are calcu lated using the internal model method. Other derivatives are reported after
different credit scoring models for different regions and product segments, as both data accessibility and customer characteristics normally vary by country and product.
The exposure weighted PD of the total credit portfolio decreased to 0.53 per cent at year-end (0.55).The risk distribution of the non-retail and household portfolios is shown on page 116.
Counterparty credit risk in derivative contracts
SEB enters into derivative contracts primarily to support customers in theman agement oftheirfinancial exposures. SEB also uses derivatives to protect cash flows and fair values offinancial assets and liabilities in its own book from mar ketfluctuations.
Counterparty creditrisk in derivative contracts is the risk of a counterparty notliving up to its contractual obligations where SEB has a claim on the counterparty. The claim on the counterparty corresponds to a net positive exposure in favour of SEB. Since the market value of a derivative fluctuates during the term to maturity,the uncertainty offuture market conditions must be taken into account. The potentialfuture exposure (PFE) is calculated by apply ing an add-on to current market value. The add-on is generated eitherthrough simulation (internal model method) or by applying a standard add-on which is set by a fixed value depending on producttype and time to maturity which reflects potential market movements forthe specific contract (standardised method).
Counterparty creditrisk in derivative contracts is reduced through the use of close-out netting agreements, where all positive and negative market val ues under an agreement can be netted atthe counterparty level, and through collateral arrangements.
SEB's simulation-based approach for calculating potentialfuture exposure (internal model method) is approved by the Swedish FSA for external capital reporting of counterparty creditrisk ofrepos, interestrate derivatives and FX derivatives in the parent company.
Counterparty creditrisk in derivative contracts affects the profit and loss through credit/debit valuation adjustments (CVA/DVA) reflecting the credit risk associated with derivative positions. These adjustments depend on mar ketrisk factors such as interestrate,foreign exchange rates and credit spreads. There is also a regulatory capitalrequirementfor credit valuation adjustments under Basel III.
netting of market values but before collateral arrangements and include standardised add-ons for potentialfuture exposure. Debtinstruments com prise all interest-bearing instruments at nominal amounts, considering credit derivatives and futures. Debtinstruments in the Life and Investment Management division are excluded.
| Loans | Contingentliabilities | Derivative instruments | Total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | |
| Banks | 41,505 | 50,475 | 22,577 | 25,284 | 26,323 | 31,025 | 90,405 | 106,784 | |
| Finance and insurance | 70,462 | 65,282 | 40,336 | 39,056 | 25,963 | 28,715 | 136,761 | 133,053 | |
| Wholesale and retail | 65,440 | 56,622 | 35,387 | 34,733 | 1,104 | 1,618 | 101,931 | 92,973 | |
| Transportation | 29,976 | 26,961 | 24,071 | 19,913 | 1,968 | 2,226 | 56,015 | 49,100 | |
| Shipping | 47,128 | 55,619 | 15,166 | 14,322 | 728 | 2,377 | 63,023 | 72,318 | |
| Business and household services | 117,056 | 114,020 | 89,668 | 88,171 | 4,266 | 4,366 | 210,990 | 206,557 | |
| Construction | 12,681 | 12,646 | 18,677 | 20,497 | 885 | 950 | 32,243 | 34,093 | |
| Manufacturing | 85,633 | 87,152 | 143,416 | 148,604 | 7,154 | 15,390 | 236,204 | 251,146 | |
| Agriculture,forestry and fishing | 17,019 | 13,208 | 3,292 | 2,213 | 325 | 407 | 20,636 | 15,828 | |
| Mining, oil and gas extraction | 23,946 | 26,608 | 22,597 | 24,554 | 1,352 | 3,221 | 47,894 | 54,383 | |
| Electricity, gas and water supply | 44,720 | 39,734 | 38,365 | 40,643 | 7,180 | 5,186 | 90,265 | 85,563 | |
| Other | 26,176 | 26,357 | 6,920 | 7,171 | 448 | 734 | 33,543 | 34,262 | |
| Corporates | 540,236 | 524,209 | 437,896 | 439,877 | 51,374 | 65,190 | 1,029,506 | 1,029,276 | |
| Commercialreal estate management | 152,200 | 157,838 | 21,480 | 20,160 | 4,853 | 7,120 | 178,533 | 185,118 | |
| Residentialreal estate management | 93,968 | 92,199 | 8,411 | 9,147 | 5,927 | 7,986 | 108,307 | 109,332 | |
| Real Estate Management | 246,169 | 250,037 | 29,891 | 29,307 | 10,781 | 15,106 | 286,840 | 294,450 | |
| Housing co-operative associations | 55,929 | 50,119 | 4,998 | 3,505 | 4 | 6 | 60,932 | 53,630 | |
| PublicAdministration | 37,533 | 30,089 | 19,131 | 24,418 | 8,123 | 7,790 | 64,787 | 62,297 | |
| Household mortgage | 504,885 | 482,531 | 30,446 | 30,859 | 535,331 | 513,390 | |||
| Other | 42,421 | 41,331 | 41,240 | 41,897 | 20 | 63 | 83,681 | 83,291 | |
| Households | 547,306 | 523,862 | 71,687 | 72,756 | 20 | 63 | 619,013 | 596,681 | |
| Credit portfolio | 1,468,678 | 1,428,791 | 586,180 | 595,147 | 96,625 | 119,180 | 2,151,483 | 2,143,118 | |
| Repos | 1,846 | 386 | |||||||
| Debtinstruments | 156,000 | 167,969 | |||||||
| TOTAL | 2,309,329 | 2,311,473 |
Credit portfolio by industry and geography 1)
Total credit portfolio comprises theGroup's loans, leasing agreements, con tingentliabilities and counterparty risks arising fromderivative contracts. Exposures are presented before reserves. Interestrate and foreign exchange derivatives and repos are calculated using the internalmodelmethod.Other derivatives are reported after netting ofmarket values but before collateral arrangements and include standardised add-ons for potentialfuture exposure.
| Group, 2017 | Sweden | Denmark | Norway | Finland | Estonia | Latvia | Lithuania | Germany | Other | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Banks | 57,160 | 1,824 | 3,761 | 4,109 | 280 | 89 | 623 | 3,308 | 19,252 | 90,405 |
| Finance and insurance | 87,949 | 1,098 | 3,966 | 1,875 | 714 | 92 | 157 | 23,640 | 17,271 | 136,761 |
| Wholesale and retail | 48,939 | 13,755 | 1,549 | 746 | 5,417 | 3,321 | 13,830 | 8,067 | 6,308 | 101,931 |
| Transportation | 31,439 | 1,169 | 2,785 | 1,638 | 1,624 | 2,826 | 4,093 | 10,227 | 213 | 56,015 |
| Shipping | 54,586 | 76 | 655 | 155 | 752 | 154 | 12 | 6,633 | 63,023 | |
| Business and household services | 147,684 | 1,501 | 4,287 | 801 | 2,648 | 2,312 | 3,018 | 43,033 | 5,707 | 210,990 |
| Construction | 20,931 | 521 | 302 | 616 | 1,302 | 833 | 2,063 | 3,181 | 2,494 | 32,243 |
| Manufacturing | 153,926 | 5,100 | 5,373 | 11,233 | 5,021 | 2,570 | 5,247 | 31,242 | 16,492 | 236,204 |
| Agriculture,forestry and fishing | 13,266 | 226 | 51 | 1,862 | 2,682 | 2,449 | 93 | 7 | 20,636 | |
| Mining, oil and gas extraction | 40,547 | 2 | 4,821 | 395 | 1,144 | 46 | 134 | 320 | 485 | 47,894 |
| Electricity, gas and water supply | 42,220 | 1,677 | 713 | 9,416 | 4,042 | 1,420 | 6,509 | 20,691 | 3,577 | 90,265 |
| Other | 27,286 | 707 | 1,303 | 789 | 273 | 232 | 217 | 2,655 | 81 | 33,543 |
| Corporates | 668,773 | 25,832 | 25,754 | 27,717 | 24,798 | 16,487 | 37,729 | 143,148 | 59,267 | 1,029,506 |
| Commercialreal estate management Residentialreal estate management |
130,156 103,849 |
140 | 2,243 25 |
1,624 | 7,360 | 5,988 | 8,727 | 22,277 4,433 |
18 | 178,533 108,307 |
| Real Estate Management | 234,005 | 140 | 2,267 | 1,624 | 7,360 | 5,988 | 8,727 | 26,710 | 18 | 286,840 |
| Housing co-operative associations | 60,932 | 60,932 | ||||||||
| PublicAdministration | 36,764 | 42 | 590 | 1,781 | 3,247 | 392 | 1,261 | 20,710 | 1 | 64,787 |
| Household mortgage Other |
477,700 43,499 |
4,647 | 2,041 22,185 |
2,055 | 20,310 3,518 |
7,628 2,497 |
22,017 2,594 |
5 | 5,635 2,680 |
535,331 83,681 |
| Households | 521,199 | 4,647 | 24,226 | 2,055 | 23,828 | 10,125 | 24,611 | 5 | 8,316 | 619,012 |
| TOTAL | 1,578,833 | 32,486 | 56,598 | 37,286 | 59,513 | 33,081 | 72,950 | 193,881 | 86,855 | 2,151,483 |
| 2016 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Banks | 69,802 | 2,701 | 2,869 | 2,798 | 310 | 98 | 350 | 11,748 | 16,108 | 106,784 |
| Finance and insurance | 83,451 | 968 | 3,513 | 1,676 | 568 | 11 | 398 | 23,937 | 18,531 | 133,053 |
| Wholesale and retail | 43,811 | 9,380 | 1,665 | 784 | 5,807 | 2,771 | 11,986 | 9,199 | 7,570 | 92,973 |
| Transportation | 26,768 | 1,770 | 2,839 | 1,669 | 1,085 | 2,720 | 2,818 | 9,219 | 212 | 49,100 |
| Shipping | 61,597 | 1,285 | 1,059 | 163 | 244 | 179 | 1 | 7,790 | 72,318 | |
| Business and household services | 144,116 | 3,754 | 6,857 | 801 | 2,146 | 2,692 | 3,129 | 39,790 | 3,272 | 206,557 |
| Construction | 22,319 | 852 | 1,579 | 614 | 994 | 788 | 1,523 | 3,231 | 2,193 | 34,093 |
| Manufacturing | 168,255 | 7,507 | 4,533 | 8,620 | 3,562 | 2,452 | 4,889 | 35,387 | 15,941 | 251,146 |
| Agriculture,forestry and fishing | 9,636 | 186 | 5 | 55 | 1,801 | 2,403 | 1,629 | 91 | 22 | 15,828 |
| Mining, oil and gas extraction | 46,480 | 5 | 5,711 | 402 | 1,163 | 59 | 129 | 1 | 433 | 54,383 |
| Electricity, gas and water supply | 43,164 | 845 | 1,063 | 10,046 | 2,447 | 1,222 | 6,635 | 19,325 | 816 | 85,563 |
| Other | 27,166 | 979 | 1,318 | 886 | 211 | 158 | 187 | 3,273 | 84 | 34,262 |
| Corporates | 676,763 | 27,531 | 30,142 | 25,716 | 20,028 | 15,455 | 33,324 | 143,453 | 56,864 | 1,029,276 |
| Commercialreal estate management | 128,736 | 141 | 2,274 | 1,775 | 7,445 | 4,294 | 8,695 | 31,756 | 2 | 185,118 |
| Residentialreal estate management | 103,397 | 49 | 280 | 5 | 5,601 | 109,332 | ||||
| Real Estate Management | 232,133 | 141 | 2,323 | 1,775 | 7,445 | 4,574 | 8,700 | 37,357 | 2 | 294,450 |
| Housing co-operative associations | 53,608 | 22 | 53,630 | |||||||
| PublicAdministration | 26,870 | 11 | 698 | 1,340 | 3,753 | 629 | 895 | 28,098 | 3 | 62,297 |
| Household mortgage | 461,221 | 2,186 | 18,000 | 7,039 | 19,881 | 5,063 | 513,390 | |||
| Other | 42,880 | 4,547 | 23,111 | 1,993 | 3,133 | 2,392 | 2,445 | 16 | 2,774 | 83,291 |
| Households | 504,101 | 4,547 | 25,297 | 1,993 | 21,133 | 9,431 | 22,326 | 16 | 7,837 | 596,681 |
| TOTAL | 1,563,277 | 34,931 | 61,329 | 33,622 | 52,669 | 30,187 | 65,595 | 220,672 | 80,836 | 2,143,118 |
1) The geographical distribution is based on where the loan is booked.Amounts before provisions for creditlosses.
Note 17 a continued Creditrisk
Credit portfolio by PDrange
| Group, 2017 | Total, excluding households | Households | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Probability of Default (PD) range |
S&P/Moody's 1) |
Banks | Corporates | Real estate management | Housing Co-ops |
Public Admin. |
Total | Households 2) PDrange |
|
| Investment grade | 0 < 0.01% 0.01 < 0.03% 0.03 < 0.12% 0.12 < 0.46% |
AAA/Aaa AA/Aa A/A BBB/Baa |
4.3% 43.4% 30.6% 12.5% |
0.5% 11.3% 26.0% 39.1% |
0.1% 5.0% 13.6% 50.0% |
0.0% 0.0% 9.7% 85.9% |
57.6% 28.2% 12.6% 1.4% |
3.1% 12.3% 22.7% 39.8% |
0 < 0.2% 0.2 < 0.4% 0.4 < 0.6% |
65.2% 19.3% 0.3% |
| 0.46 < 1.74% 1.74 < 7% |
BB/Ba B/B |
4.7% 1.9% |
17.1% 4.2% |
29.6% 1.2% |
4.4% 0.1% |
0.3% 0.0% |
17.5% 3.1% |
0.6 < 1% 1 < 5% |
7.4% 5.4% |
|
| Watch list | 7 < 9% 9 < 22% 22 < 100% |
B/B CCC/Caa C/C |
0.6% 1.9% 0.0% |
0.3% 0.7% 0.0% |
0.0% 0.2% 0.1% |
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% |
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% |
0.3% 0.6% 0.0% |
5 < 10% 10 < 30% 30 < 50% |
0.9% 0.9% 0.3% |
| Default | 100% | D | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.6% | 50 < 100% | 0.4% |
| TOTAL | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | TOTAL | 100% |
2016
| Investment grade | 0 < 0.01% 0.01 < 0.03% 0.03 < 0.12% 0.12 < 0.46% |
AAA/Aaa AA/Aa A/A BBB/Baa |
5.7% 46.3% 31.3% 9.7% |
0.7% 12.1% 27.4% 36.8% |
0.0% 4.1% 16.5% 48.5% |
0.0% 0.1% 28.6% 68.0% |
25.9% 60.9% 10.3% 2.4% |
1.9% 14.5% 25.0% 36.8% |
0 < 0.2% 0.2 < 0.4% 0.4 < 0.6% |
66.1% 15.9% 0.3% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.46 < 1.74% 1.74 < 7% |
BB/Ba B/B |
3.5% 1.9% |
18.0% 3.3% |
28.1% 1.8% |
2.7% 0.7% |
0.1% 0.4% |
17.6% 2.7% |
0.6 < 1% 1 < 5% |
10.8% 4.4% |
|
| Watch list | 7 < 9% 9 < 22% 22 < 100% |
B/B CCC/Caa C/C |
0.2% 1.2% 0.1% |
0.7% 0.5% 0.0% |
0.1% 0.3% 0.1% |
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% |
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% |
0.5% 0.5% 0.0% |
5 < 10% 10 < 30% 30 < 50% |
1.0% 0.7% 0.3% |
| Default | 100% | D | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.4% | 50 < 100% | 0.5% |
| TOTAL | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | TOTAL | 100% |
1) Estimated link between internal PDs and externalratings based on comparison of historical default outcomes.
2)Household exposure based on internalratings based (IRB) reported as exposure in the event of a default (EAD– exposure at default).
Credit portfolio protected by guarantees, credit derivatives and collaterals 1)
| Group | Parent company | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Credit portfolio |
Protection via guarantees and credit derivatives |
Protection via pledged collaterals |
Of which, financial collaterals |
Credit portfolio |
Protection via guarantees and credit derivatives |
Protection via pledged collaterals |
Of which, financial collaterals |
||
| Banks | 90,405 | 2,579 | 17,106 | 16,266 | 84,682 | 645 | 16,652 | 14,678 | ||
| Corporates, Real estate management | ||||||||||
| andHousing co-operative associations | 1,377,278 | 33,517 | 460,390 | 32,170 | 1,080,154 | 27,040 | 389,263 | 29,934 | ||
| PublicAdministration | 64,787 | 5,234 | 7,716 | 3,495 | 37,023 | 3,615 | 5,536 | 2,598 | ||
| Households | 619,012 | 3,577 | 467,703 | 3,704 | 502,096 | 338 | 417,691 | 338 | ||
| TOTAL | 2,151,483 | 44,907 | 952,915 | 55,635 | 1,703,955 | 31,638 | 829,141 | 47,548 | ||
| 2016 | ||||||||||
| Banks | 106,784 | 3,582 | 9,415 | 7,793 | 92,923 | 1,434 | 7,461 | 6,585 | ||
| Corporates, Real estate management | ||||||||||
| andHousing co-operative associations | 1,377,356 | 50,102 | 475,067 | 30,360 | 1,080,970 | 47,719 | 398,257 | 28,090 | ||
| PublicAdministration | 62,297 | 30,601 | 611 | 611 | 27,273 | 24,291 | 7 | 7 | ||
| Households | 596,681 | 2,600 | 501,279 | 2,891 | 486,000 | 448,234 | ||||
| TOTAL | 2,143,118 | 86,885 | 986,372 | 41,655 | 1,687,166 | 73,444 | 853,959 | 34,682 |
1)Only riskmitigation arrangements eligible in capital adequacy reporting are represented in the tables above.
Note 17 a continued Creditrisk
Loan portfolio by industry and geography 1)
The loan portfolio comprises the Group's loans and leasing agreements.
| 2017 | Sweden | Denmark | Norway | Finland | Estonia | Latvia | Lithuania | Germany | Other | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Banks | 22,855 | 319 | 1,197 | 471 | 264 | 30 | 579 | 1,026 | 14,765 | 41,505 |
| Finance and insurance | 51,858 | 147 | 1,452 | 123 | 632 | 86 | 14 | 9,149 | 7,001 | 70,462 |
| Wholesale and retail | 30,046 | 13,077 | 1,116 | 598 | 3,758 | 2,188 | 8,486 | 2,095 | 4,075 | 65,440 |
| Transportation | 13,828 | 685 | 1,948 | 1,492 | 1,269 | 1,951 | 3,450 | 5,335 | 17 | 29,976 |
| Shipping | 40,534 | 14 | 445 | 155 | 216 | 151 | 9 | 5,603 | 47,128 | |
| Business and household services | 89,019 | 1,017 | 745 | 113 | 2,250 | 1,747 | 2,173 | 17,568 | 2,422 | 117,056 |
| Construction | 10,383 | 308 | 225 | 43 | 437 | 207 | 940 | 67 | 72 | 12,681 |
| Manufacturing | 52,154 | 3,339 | 1,328 | 2,821 | 3,547 | 1,852 | 3,242 | 7,616 | 9,734 | 85,633 |
| Agriculture,forestry and fishing | 10,920 | 12 | 0 | 51 | 1,737 | 2,321 | 1,977 | 17,019 | ||
| Mining, oil and gas extraction | 21,641 | 2 | 731 | 395 | 630 | 41 | 81 | 319 | 105 | 23,946 |
| Electricity, gas and water supply | 21,346 | 1,575 | 146 | 8,578 | 1,327 | 1,291 | 3,573 | 6,791 | 92 | 44,720 |
| Other | 21,686 | 707 | 585 | 592 | 250 | 218 | 188 | 1,931 | 19 | 26,176 |
| Corporates | 363,415 | 20,883 | 8,723 | 14,962 | 16,054 | 12,054 | 24,133 | 50,872 | 29,139 | 540,236 |
| Commercialreal estate management | 109,410 | 43 | 1,454 | 438 | 6,714 | 4,728 | 8,529 | 20,884 | 152,200 | |
| Residentialreal estate management | 89,577 | 19 | 4,372 | 93,968 | ||||||
| Real Estate Management | 198,988 | 43 | 1,473 | 438 | 6,714 | 4,728 | 8,529 | 25,256 | 246,169 | |
| Housing co-operative associations | 55,929 | 55,929 | ||||||||
| PublicAdministration | 17,541 | 42 | 75 | 1,107 | 1,242 | 309 | 803 | 16,414 | 37,533 | |
| Household mortgage | 448,886 | 2,041 | 19,745 | 7,479 | 21,617 | 5,117 | 504,885 | |||
| Other | 24,156 | 2,455 | 5,479 | 1,028 | 2,936 | 1,925 | 1,958 | 5 | 2,479 | 42,421 |
| Households | 473,042 | 2,455 | 7,520 | 1,028 | 22,682 | 9,404 | 23,575 | 5 | 7,596 | 547,306 |
| TOTAL | 1,131,770 | 23,742 | 18,988 | 18,006 | 46,955 | 26,525 | 57,620 | 93,573 | 51,500 | 1,468,678 |
| Repos, creditinstitutions Repos, general public Debtinstruments Reserves |
56 42,231 13,030 –4,476 |
|||||||||
| TOTAL | 1,519,518 | |||||||||
2016
| Banks | 29,647 | 271 | 414 | 425 | 260 | 82 | 285 | 7,447 | 11,644 | 50,475 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Finance and insurance | 45,506 | 339 | 1,006 | 204 | 252 | 10 | 194 | 9,344 | 8,427 | 65,282 |
| Wholesale and retail | 26,393 | 7,878 | 1,026 | 664 | 3,795 | 1,577 | 7,729 | 2,154 | 5,406 | 56,622 |
| Transportation | 13,331 | 649 | 2,052 | 1,499 | 778 | 1,668 | 2,330 | 4,590 | 64 | 26,961 |
| Shipping | 48,359 | 7 | 519 | 163 | 240 | 173 | 1 | 6,157 | 55,619 | |
| Business and household services | 85,926 | 930 | 3,032 | 279 | 1,927 | 2,242 | 2,453 | 16,615 | 616 | 114,020 |
| Construction | 10,963 | 233 | 170 | 17 | 380 | 167 | 522 | 187 | 7 | 12,646 |
| Manufacturing | 55,434 | 2,729 | 861 | 3,698 | 2,330 | 1,823 | 3,150 | 7,487 | 9,640 | 87,152 |
| Agriculture,forestry and fishing | 8,097 | 15 | 53 | 1,683 | 2,054 | 1,304 | 2 | 13,208 | ||
| Mining, oil and gas extraction | 25,146 | 5 | 86 | 402 | 676 | 48 | 51 | 194 | 26,608 | |
| Electricity, gas and water supply | 20,655 | 24 | 1 | 8,236 | 1,329 | 827 | 4,112 | 4,420 | 130 | 39,734 |
| Other | 21,006 | 937 | 579 | 591 | 188 | 137 | 161 | 2,734 | 24 | 26,357 |
| Corporates | 360,816 | 13,746 | 9,332 | 15,806 | 13,578 | 10,726 | 22,007 | 47,531 | 30,667 | 524,209 |
| Commercialreal estate management | 106,902 | 11 | 1,345 | 451 | 6,868 | 4,148 | 7,893 | 30,220 | 157,838 | |
| Residentialreal estate management | 86,746 | 41 | 276 | 5 | 5,131 | 92,199 | ||||
| Real Estate Management | 193,648 | 11 | 1,386 | 451 | 6,868 | 4,424 | 7,898 | 35,351 | 250,037 | |
| Housing co-operative associations | 50,097 | 22 | 50,119 | |||||||
| PublicAdministration | 7,573 | 11 | 85 | 1,123 | 1,058 | 393 | 641 | 19,205 | 30,089 | |
| Household mortgage | 431,245 | 2,186 | 17,596 | 6,944 | 19,497 | 5,063 | 482,531 | |||
| Other | 23,545 | 2,407 | 5,907 | 1,044 | 2,578 | 1,835 | 1,855 | 15 | 2,145 | 41,331 |
| Households | 454,790 | 2,407 | 8,093 | 1,044 | 20,174 | 8,779 | 21,352 | 15 | 7,208 | 523,862 |
| TOTAL | 1,096,571 | 16,446 | 19,310 | 18,849 | 41,938 | 24,404 | 52,183 | 109,549 | 49,541 | 1,428,791 |
| Repos, creditinstitutions Repos, general public Debtinstruments Reserves |
914 63,524 15,106 –4,789 |
|||||||||
| TOTAL | 1,503,546 |
1) The geographical distribution is based on where the loan is booked.
Note 17 a continued Creditrisk
Debtinstruments
At year-end 2017, SEB's credit exposure in the bond portfolio amounted to SEK 156bn (168). The exposure comprises all interest-bearing instruments at nominal amounts including certain credit derivatives and futures.
Distribution by geography
| Central&local governments |
Corporates | Covered bonds | Asset-backed securities |
Financials | Total | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | |
| Sweden | 19.8% | 10.3% | 0.8% | 0.7% | 15.7% | 16.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 36.5% | 27.2% |
| Germany | 20.6% | 23.8% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 3.9% | 3.6% | 4.4% | 2.7% | 29.2% | 30.3% |
| Norway | 3.5% | 3.4% | 0.3% | 0.1% | 3.9% | 3.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.9% | 8.7% | 7.5% |
| Denmark | 0.1% | 2.7% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 8.0% | 9.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.7% | 8.5% | 13.0% |
| US | 7.5% | 7.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 7.5% | 7.3% |
| Finland | 3.0% | 2.8% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 3.1% | 2.9% |
| Luxembourg | 1.0% | 3.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 1.3% | 3.3% |
| Netherlands | 0.4% | 0.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.4% | 1.7% |
| Spain | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.5% |
| Ireland | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Italy | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Portugal | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Greece | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Europe, other | 3.0% | 4.2% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 3.1% | 4.9% |
| Rest of world | 1.7% | 1.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.7% | 1.1% |
| TOTAL | 60.5% | 59.6% | 1.5% | 1.2% | 27.9% | 29.2% | 3.9% | 4.8% | 6.2% | 5.2% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Distribution by rating | ||||||||||||
| AAA | 42.5% | 38.6% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 27.4% | 28.3% | 3.3% | 3.4% | 4.2% | 2.6% | 77.5% | 73.0% |
| AA | 11.7% | 11.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.9% | 1.0% | 12.8% | 13.0% |
| A | 0.9% | 2.7% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.7% | 0.1% | 0.2% | 1.7% | 3.7% |
| BBB | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.3% | 0.9% |
| BB/B | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.2% |
CCC/CC 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% No issue rating 1) 5.4% 6.9% 0.8% 0.6% 0.3% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.9% 1.3% 7.5% 9.2% TOTAL 60.5% 59.6% 1.5% 1.2% 27.9% 29.2% 3.9% 4.8% 6.2% 5.2% 100.0% 100.0%
1) MainlyGerman local governments (Bundesländer).
17b Market risk
Definition
Marketrisk is the risk oflosses in balance sheet positions and obligations, arising from adversemovements in market prices. Marketrisk can arise from changes in interestrates,foreign exchange rates, credit spreads, commodity and equity prices, implied volatilities, inflation and marketliquidity.Aclear dis tinction is made between marketrisks related to trading activity, i.e.,trading book risks, and structural market and netinterestincome risks, i.e., banking book risks. Whereas the trading book is under a daily mark-to-marketregime, positions in the banking book are typically held at amortised cost.
Risk management
Market risks in the trading book arise from SEB's customer-driven trading activities and in the liquidity portfolio. The trading activities are carried out by the Large Corporates & Financial Institutions division in its capacity as market maker in international foreign exchange, equity and debt capital mar kets. The liquidity portfolio, which is managed by the treasury function, is part of SEB's liquidity reserve and consists of investments in pledgeable and highly liquid bonds.
Marketrisk in the banking book arises as a result of balance sheet mismatches in currencies, interestterms and interestrate periods. The treasury function has overallresponsibility for managing these risks, which are con solidated centrally.
the defined benefit plans for employees as a result of mismatches between the market value of assets and liabilities. Marketrisks in the pension obliga tions and the life insurance business are notincluded in the marketrisk figures below.Referto note 17e forinformation on marketrisk in the life insurance business. The Board ofDirectors defines how much marketrisk is acceptable by set-
Marketrisk also arises in the bank's traditional life insurance operations and
ting the overall marketrisk limits and general instructions. The marketrisk tol erance and limits are defined forthe trading book, banking book and defined benefit plans. TheGroup Risk Committee delegates the marketrisk mandate to the divisions and the treasury function, which in turn further allocate the limits internally. The trading book risks are managed atthe differenttrading locations within a comprehensive set oflimits in VaR, stop-loss, sensitivities and stress tests.
The risk organisation measures,follows up and reports the marketrisk taken by the various units within theGroup on a daily basis. The risk organisa tion also independently verifies the valuation of positions held atfair value and calculates the capital bufferfor prudent valuation. The risk controlfunction is presentin the trading rooms andmonitors limit compliance and market prices at closing as well as valuation standards and the introduction of new products. Marketrisks are reported atleast on a monthly basis to theGroup Risk Com mittee and the Board's Risk and Capital Committee.
SEB is exposed to the following marketrisk types:
| Risk type | Defined as the risk ofloss orreduced income due to | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Interestrate risk | Changes in interestrates | Inherentin all banking business |
| Credit spread risk | A change in the creditworthiness of an issuer of, forinstance, a bond or a credit derivative |
Primarily presentin the bank's bond holdings |
| Foreign exchange risk | Variations in the exchange rates | Foreign exchange trading and the bank's operations in variousmarkets |
| Equity price risk | Variations in equity prices | Marketmaking and customer activity in equities and equity derivatives |
| Commodity price risk | Variations in commodity prices | Customer-driven activities in commodities |
| Volatility risk | Changes in implied volatility | Market making and customer activity of options across all asset classes |
| Inflation risk | Change in inflation | Bond holdings, value of assets on balance sheet |
| Marketliquidity risk | Bid-ask spread widenings | Sale of assets or closing of positions |
| Credit value adjustment1) | Variations in the counterparty creditrisk based on the expected future exposure |
OTC derivative contracts |
1) Credit value adjustmentis fundamentally creditrisk, butthe exposure is calculated using marketrisk drivers (interestrate, currency, etc.).
Note 17 b continued Marketrisk
Risk measurement
When assessing the marketrisk exposure, SEB uses measures that capture losses under normal and stressed market conditions. Marketrisks under nor mal market circumstances are measured using Value at Risk (VaR) as well as specific measures that are relevantforthe various risk types. These measures are complemented by stress tests and scenario analyses, in which poten tial losses under extreme market conditions are estimated. Since no method can cover allrisks at alltimes, several approaches are used, and the results are assessed based on judgment and experience.
Value at Risk and Stressed Value at Risk
VaR expresses the maximum potential loss that could arise during a certain time period with a given degree of probability. SEB uses a historical simulation VaR model with a ten-day time horizon and 99 per cent confidence intervalto
measure, limit and report VaR. The model aggregates marketrisk exposure for allrisk types and covers a wide range ofrisk factors in all asset classes. SEB also uses a stressed VaR measure, where VaR is calculated forthe cur rent portfolio using market data from a historic,turbulenttime period cover ing the Lehman Brothers' default. The VaR model is validated using backtesting analysis.
Alimitation of SEB'sVaR model is thatit uses historical data to estimate potentialmarket changes.As such it may not predict all outcomes, especially in a rapidly changing market.Also,VaR does nottake into account any actions to reduce risk as the model assumes thatthe portfolio is unchanged.
SEB'sVaR and stressedVaR models have been approved by the Swedish FSAfor calculation ofregulatory capitalrequirements for allthe general marketrisks in the bank's trading book in the parent bank and the subsidiary Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken S.A. in Luxembourg.
Value atRisk
| 2017 | 31Dec | Average | Average | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trading Book (99%,ten days) | Min | Max | 2017 | 2017 | 2016 |
| Commodities risk | 6 | 42 | 7 | 18 | 22 |
| Credit spread risk | 28 | 73 | 28 | 47 | 63 |
| Equity price risk | 12 | 61 | 12 | 29 | 26 |
| Foreign exchange rate risk | 6 | 54 | 39 | 28 | 32 |
| Interestrate risk | 38 | 82 | 54 | 58 | 72 |
| Volatilities risk | 10 | 38 | 15 | 19 | 17 |
| Diversification | –79 | –108 | –120 | ||
| TOTAL | 64 | 119 | 76 | 91 | 112 |
| Banking Book (99%,ten days) | |||||
| Credit spread risk | 37 | 61 | 38 | 48 | 60 |
| Equity price risk | 11 | 29 | 16 | 15 | 58 |
| Foreign exchange rate risk | 1 | ||||
| Interestrate risk | 121 | 172 | 172 | 143 | 232 |
| Diversification | –46 | –45 | –110 | ||
| TOTAL | 145 | 182 | 180 | 161 | 240 |
Stress tests and scenario analysis
Scenario analysis and stress tests are a key part ofthe risk management framework, complementing the VaR measure. In particular,they testthe portfolios using scenarios otherthan those available in the VaR simulation win dow, and coverlongertime horizons. SEB stresses its portfolios by applying extreme movements in marketfactors which have been observed in the past (historical scenarios) as well as extreme movements that could potentially happen in the future (hypothetical orforward-looking scenarios). Reverse stress tests are also used forthe totaltrading portfolio as well as forindivid ual divisions and business units,to identify scenarios that would lead to a given significantloss,forinstance,the breach of a stop-loss limit. This type
of analysis provides management with a view on the potential impactthat large market moves in individualrisk factors, as well as broader market sce narios, could have on a portfolio. The risk tolerance framework includes limits on different stress test scenarios.
Specific risk measures
VaR and stress tests are complemented by specific risk measures including Delta 1% forinterestrisk, and Single and Aggregated FX for currency risk.
In addition, all units that handle risk forfinancial instruments valued at mar ket are limited by a stop-loss limit. The stop-loss limitindicates the maximum loss a unit can incur before mitigating actions are taken.
CVA/DVAsensitivities
The credit and debit valuation adjustments (CVA/DVA) are sensitive to market movements, in particularto movements in interestrates, credit spreads and foreign exchange rates.
In orderto monitorthis sensitivity, SEB stresses these asset classes on a regular basis and calculates the impact on the valuation adjustments. This is done by comparing the original CVA/DVA numbers with the stressed CVA/DVA numbers where the currentrates and credit spreads have been moved up 100 basis points and where SEK has appreciated 5 per centto all other currencies compared with the currentlevel.
| 2017 | CVA | DVA | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interestrates + 100bp | 104 | 49 | 153 |
| Credit spreads + 100bp | –685 | 373 | –312 |
| SEK + 5% | 11 | –5 | 6 |
2016
| Interestrates + 100bp | 180 | 75 | 255 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Credit spreads + 100bp | –928 | 384 | –544 |
| SEK + 5% | –22 | 6 | –16 |
Note 17 b continued Marketrisk
Interestrate risk
Interestrate risk refers to the risk thatthe value ofthe Group's assets, liabili ties and interest-related derivatives will be negatively affected by changes in interestrates or otherrelevantrisk factors.
The majority ofthe Group's interestrate risks are structural and arise within the banking operations when there is a mismatch between the interest
Interestrate sensitivity in trading book pertime buckets
fixing periods of assets and liabilities, including derivatives.
The table below shows the sensitivity to a +100 basis point change in the interestrates on the banking and trading book by currency and in different buckets of maturity. This is calculated as the value change for a shift of 1 basis point and then scaled up to reflect a 100 basis point move.
| 2017 EUR SEK USD |
< 3 months 20 37 –91 |
3–12 months –13 4 –37 |
1–2 years 88 –53 –140 |
2–5 years 227 213 –30 |
5–10 years 105 152 –32 |
>10 years –256 11 –5 |
Total 171 364 –336 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | –2 | –138 | 66 | –232 | –67 | 339 | –33 |
| TOTAL | –36 | –184 | –39 | 178 | 158 | 89 | 166 |
| 2016 | |||||||
| EUR | 11 | 182 | –146 | 164 | 187 | –124 | 275 |
| SEK | 23 | 246 | –553 | 286 | 170 | –74 | 98 |
| USD | –112 | 17 | –29 | –17 | –53 | –10 | –205 |
| Other | –2 | –111 | 24 | –94 | –124 | 155 | –151 |
| TOTAL | –80 | 335 | –704 | 339 | 180 | –54 | 17 |
Interestrate sensitivity in banking book pertime buckets 1)
| 2017 | < 3 months | 3–12 months |
1–2 years | 2–5 years | 5–10 years | >10 years | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR SEK USD Other |
16 –199 68 –15 |
–349 –715 29 –58 |
–16 –397 50 –5 |
–311 –643 15 –35 |
–7 –258 –4 –4 |
116 70 149 |
–551 –2,142 307 –117 |
| TOTAL | –131 | –1,093 | –368 | –973 | –273 | 335 | –2,503 |
| 2016 | |||||||
| EUR SEK USD Other |
30 –249 80 –26 |
–237 –597 107 –54 |
–86 –281 2 –16 |
–382 –524 25 –44 |
–47 –243 –3 –5 |
210 85 170 |
–512 –1,808 380 –145 |
| TOTAL | –165 | –781 | –381 | –925 | –298 | 465 | –2,085 |
1) by currency SEK m/100 bp
17c Operational risk
Definition
Operationalrisk is the risk ofloss resulting from inadequate orfailed internal processes, people and systems (e.g., breakdown ofIT systems, mistakes, fraud, other deficiencies in internal control) orfrom external events (natural disasters, external crime, etc.). The definition includes compliance, legal and financialreporting, information security, security and venture execution risk, but excludes strategic and reputationalrisk.
Risk management
Operationalrisk is inherentin all of SEB's operations and the responsibility to manage operationalrisks rests with all managers throughoutthe bank. SEB aims to maintain a sound risk culture with low operationalrisk and loss levelthrough an effective internal control environment by ensuring a struc tured and consistent usage ofrisk mitigating tools and processes.
All new or changed products, processes and/or systems as well as reorgan isations are evaluated in a group-common New Product Approval Process (NPAP). The aim is to identify potential operationalrisks and ensure that pro active measures are taken to protect SEB from entering into unintended risktaking that cannot be immediately managed by the organisation. The process is also used for yearly reviews of significant outsourcing arrangements in the Group.
All business units with significantrisk embedded in their operations shall regularly complete Risk and Control Self-Assessments (RCSA) according to a group-wide methodology. The assessments are designed to identify and mitigate significant operationalrisks embedded in SEB's various business and support processes. There is comprehensive participation by each business unitthroughoutthe organisation. The RCSA framework is used to analyse SEB's operationalrisk profile and help achieve operational excellence and high performance.
SEB ensures thatthe organisation is prepared to respond to and operate throughout a period of major disruption by identifying critical activities and maintaining updated,tested and communicated business continuity plans in a group-wide system forthis purpose.
All employees are required to escalate and registerrisk-related events orincidents so thatrisks can be properly identified, assessed, monitored, mitigated and reported. SEB uses a group-wide IT application to capture risk events and other operationalrisk data for analysis and benchmarking towards peers.
SEB conducts regulartraining and education in key areas, including manda tory training for all staffin information security,fraud prevention, anti-money laundering, know-your-customer procedures and SEB's Code of Business Conduct. SEB also has a formal whistle-blower procedure that encourages employees to reportimproprieties and unethical orillegal conduct.
Cyber- and other organized crime continue to evolve and SEB continuously works to enhance and improve its already well established processes for mitigating, evaluating and following up on existing and future cyberrisks.
The risk organisation is responsible for measuring and reporting SEB's operationalrisks. Significantincidents and the risk level, both on Group and divisional/site level, is analysed and reported monthly to the Group Executive Committee,the Group Risk Committee and the Board's Risk and Capital Com mittee as well as local/divisional management. In 2017,the total losses from operational incidents amounted to SEK 185m (263).
Risk measurement
SEB uses theAdvancedMeasurementApproach (AMA) to calculate the regula tory capitalrequirementfor operationalrisk.
17d Business risk
Definition
Business risk is the risk oflowerrevenues due to reduced volumes, price pressure or competition. Business risk includes venture decision risk (related to undertakings such as acquisitions, large IT projects,transformations, out sourcing, etc.). Strategic risk is close in nature to business risk, butfocuses on large-scale or structuralrisk factors. Reputationalrisk is the risk arising from negative perception of SEB orthe industry in general.
Risk management
Business, strategic and reputationalrisks are inherentin doing business. Digitalisation ofthe banking industry is accelerating and new types of com petitors are emerging. The extensive new regulatory framework for banking and financial institutions is significantly impacting the industry. Corporate sustainability plays an increasingly important part of a company's reputation. SEB continuously works to mitigate business, strategic and reputationalrisks in many ways,for example, with regular strategic business reviews, proactive cost management, an agile step-by-step IT development approach, an ambitious corporate sustainability agenda and active dialogues on regulatory matters.
17e Insurance risk
Definition
Insurance risk in SEB consists of allrisk related to theGroup's insurance opera tions. SEB's life insurance operations consist of unit-linked insurance and tradi tional life insurance. The main risks include marketrisk and underwriting risk.
Marketrisk in the insurance business is the risk forlosses on traditional life insurance policies with guaranteed benefits due to changes in fair value of assets and liabilities. Such changes in fair value can be caused by changes in interestrates, credit spreads, equity prices, property values, exchange rates and implied volatilities.
Underwriting risk pertains to the risk ofloss or of negative changes in the value ofinsurance liabilities (technical provisions) due to inadequate pricing and/or provisioning assumptions. Itincludes factors such as average mortality, longevity, disability/morbidity (including risks thatresultfrom fluctuation in the timing and amount of claim settlements), catastrophe risk (e.g., extreme orirregular events), expense risk and lapse risk (i.e., policyholder behaviour risk).
Risk management and measurement
In unit-linked insurance,the marketrisk is borne by the policyholder, while the underwriting risk is limited. However,there is an indirect exposure to market risk through the policyholders' investments, since a significant part ofthe future income stream ofthe life insurance business is based on assets under management. The profitability for existing and new business is closely monitored.
Marketrisk in the traditional life insurance products with guaranteed returns is mitigated through standard marketrisk hedging schemes and monitored through asset/liability management (ALM) risk measures and stress tests. This is supplemented by marketrisk tools such as VaR and scenario
analysis. In the traditional products,the difference between asset values and the guaranteed obligations constitutes a buffer which is intended to cover SEB's risk.
Underwriting risks are controlled through the use of actuarial analysis and stress tests ofthe existing insurance portfolio. Mortality and disability/mor bidity risks are reinsured forlarge individual claims orfor several claims attributable to the same event. Underwriting risk parameters are validated annually. Policyholders within certain traditional life insurance products are free to move their policies from SEB. The utilisation ofthis option has been very low historically. Nevertheless,to safeguard against unplanned cash outflows the bank maintains sufficientliquid investments. Furthermore, continuous cash flow analysis is conducted to mitigate this risk.
The risk organisation is responsible for measuring and controlling the risks inherentin SEB's life insurance operations. Measurement and monitoring of ALM risk measures, VaR, scenario analysis and stress tests are performed on a regular basis for each insurance company. The risk organisation also forms part ofthe independentrisk managementfunction in the respective insur ance companies from a Solvency II perspective. Key risks are reported to the Group Risk Committee,the Board's Risk and Capital Committee and to the boards of each insurance company.
Solvency II, effective as of 1 January 2016, is a harmonised regulatory framework with respectto governance, internal control and capitalrequire ments across insurance companies in the EU. Solvency II calculations are performed atleast monthly, and the required reporting is submitted to the financial supervisors on a quarterly basis. Calculations show that SEB's life companies are financially strong and resilientto different stressed scenarios.
17f Liquidity risk
Definition
Liquidity risk is the risk thatthe Group is unable to refinance its existing assets oris unable to meetthe demand for additional liquidity. Liquidity risk also entails the risk thatthe Group is forced to borrow at unfavourable rates oris forced to sell assets at a loss in orderto meetits payment commitments.
Liquidity management and risk measurement
The Board of Directors has established a comprehensive framework for man aging the bank's liquidity requirements in the short- and long-term. The aim of SEB's liquidity risk managementis to ensure thatthe Group has a controlled liquidity risk situation, with adequate volumes ofliquid assets in allrelevant currencies to meetits liquidity requirements in allforeseeable circumstances, withoutincurring substantial cost.
The liquidity risk is managed through the limits set by the Board and toler ances set by the Group Risk Committee. Liquidity limits are setforthe Group, branches and specific legal entities, as well as for exposures in certain currencies. The treasury function has the overallresponsibility forliquidity management and funding, supported by localtreasury centres in the Group's major markets. The risk function regularly measures and reports limit utilisation based on different market conditions and liquidity stress tests to the Group Risk Committee and the Board's Risk and Capital Committee.
Liquidity management and the structuring ofthe balance sheetfrom a liquidity point of view are built on three basic perspectives: (i) the structural liquidity perspective, in which stable funding is putin relation to illiquid assets; (ii) the bank's tolerance for short-term stress in the form of a shut down ofthe wholesale and interbank funding markets (wholesale funding
dependence); and, (iii) the bank's tolerance to a severe stress scenario (survival horizon) where, in addition to a limited funding market,the bank experiences a severe outflow of deposits.
Structural liquidity risk
In orderto maintain a sound structural liquidity position,the structure ofthe liability side should be based on the composition of assets. The more longterm lending and otherilliquid assets,the more stable funding is required. In SEB,this is measured as the Core Gap ratio, which is conceptually equivalent to the Basel Committee's Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR), i.e., a ratio between stable funding (over 1 year maturity) and illiquid assets (over 1 year maturity). The difference between the internal Core Gap ratio and the exter nal NSFR is thatthe Core Gap ratio is calculated on a more detailed level based on internal statistics, which results in different weightings of available and required stable funding.
Wholesale funding dependence
One way of measuring the capacity for deteriorating market conditions is to assess the time that SEB's liquid assets would lastifthe wholesale and inter bank fundingmarkets were closed. Thismeasure,the maturing funding ratio, captures the bank's liquid assets in relation to wholesale funding and netinterbank borrowings that come to maturity overthe comingmonths, or as the number of months it would take to deplete the liquid assets in a scenario where all maturing funding must be financed through liquid assets. Wholesale funding dependence is also measured as the loan to depositratio.
Stressed survival horizon
Severe stress can be modelled by combining assumptions of a limited wholesale funding market with assumptions of deposit outflows, drawdowns on com mitments and otherliquidity demanding events. The outcome is captured by the regulatory defined Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) where, in a stressed scenario, modelled net outflows during a 30-day period are related to the amount oftotal liquid assets. SEB also measures the time it would take forthe liquid assets to be depleted in a severely stressed scenario, expressed as the stressed survival horizon. In addition, SEB monitors various rating agencies' survival metrics.
Internal liquidity adequacy assessment process
Liquidity risk is not primarily mitigated by capital. However,there are strong links between a bank's capital and liquidity position. Hence, an internal liquidity adequacy assessment process (ILAAP) complements the ICAAP. The ILAAP is designed to identify potential gaps against SEB's long-term desired level ofliquidity adequacy,taking into accountthat effective liquidity man agementis a continuous process.
Liquidity reserve 1)
| 2017 | 2016 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEK | EUR | USD | Other | Total | SEK | EUR | USD | Other | Total | |
| Cash and holdings in central banks | 5,680 | 79,653 | 57,802 | 46,865 | 190,000 | 61,808 | 83,837 | 55,755 | 16,409 | 217,809 |
| Deposits in other banks available overnight | 509 | 566 | 2,515 | 4,734 | 8,324 | 242 | 1,377 | 2,536 | 3,601 | 7,756 |
| Securities issued or guaranteed by | ||||||||||
| sovereigns, central banks or multilateral | ||||||||||
| development banks | 3,611 | 19,699 | 18,613 | 988 | 42,911 | 3,465 | 35,387 | 18,902 | 11,091 | 68,845 |
| Securities issued or guaranteed by | ||||||||||
| municipalities or other public sector entities | 2,202 | 14,329 | 6,610 | 862 | 24,004 | 5,307 | 3,347 | 7,411 | 171 | 16,236 |
| Covered bonds issued by otherinstitutions | 34,099 | 463 | 413 | 32,878 | 67,852 | 52,419 | 1,274 | 193 | 49,731 | 103,617 |
| Covered bonds issued by SEB | –3,516 | –3,516 | 2,212 | 2,212 | ||||||
| Securities issued by non-financial | ||||||||||
| corporations | 358 | 358 | 5,276 | 5,276 | ||||||
| Securities issued by financial corporations | ||||||||||
| (notincluding covered bonds) | –114 | 5,341 | 4,284 | 287 | 9,797 | 2,923 | 2,559 | 5,482 | ||
| TOTAL | 42,828 120,052 | 90,236 | 86,614 | 339,730 | 125,453 133,421 | 87,356 | 81,003 | 427,233 |
1) The liquidity reserve is presented in accordance with the template defined by the Swedish Bankers'Association.Assets included in the liquidity reserve should comply with the following:Assets shall be underthe control ofthe Treasury function in the bank, not be encumbered and be pledgeable with central banks. Furthermore, bonds shall have a maximumrisk weight of 20% underthe standardised approach to creditrisk ofthe Basel IIframework and a lowestrating ofAa2/AA–.Assets are disclosed using market values.
Liquidity risk management measures
| 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|
| CoreGap ratio1) | 108% | 114% |
| Loan to depositratio | 143% | 143% |
| Liquidity Coverage Ratio (defined by the Swedish FSA) | 145% | 168% |
1) CoreGap ratio represents the parent company, SEBAG(Germany), SEB PankAS (Estonia), SEB BankaAS (Latvia) and SEB bankasAB (Lithuania).
Contractual maturities
The following tables present cash flows by remaining contractual maturities atthe balance sheet date and applies the earliest date on which the Group can be required to pay regardless of probability assumptions. The cash flows are
not discounted. Derivatives are reported atfair value. Obligations such as loan commitments are reported as when the obligation matures.
Group, 2017
| Balance sheet (contractual maturity dates) |
Payable on demand | < 3 months | 1) 3–12 months | 1–5 years | >5 years | Not distributed |
Insurance 2) |
Subtotal | Discount effect |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash and cash balances with central banks Loans to central banks Loans to creditinstitutions |
177,222 373 1,243 |
12,088 20,266 |
300 5,428 |
6,314 | 749 | 553 | 177,222 12,761 34,553 |
17 162 |
177,222 12,778 56 34,715 |
|
| of which repos | 56 | 56 | ||||||||
| General governments | 474 | 12,384 | 15,634 | 7,621 | 4,228 | 40,341 | 1,225 | 41,566 | ||
| Households Corporates |
13 1,796 |
41,138 241,063 |
145,955 152,922 |
320,558 355,844 |
45,084 83,660 |
552,748 835,285 |
23,535 31,668 |
576,283 866,953 |
||
| Loans to the public of which eligible debt securities |
2,283 | 294,585 | 314,511 4,419 |
684,024 7,491 |
132,972 985 |
1,428,375 12,895 |
56,428 285 |
180 13 1,484,803 42 230 |
||
| of which repos | 42,042 | 42,042 | 188 | , , |
||||||
| Debt securities | 25,725 | 23,795 | 81,911 | 8,917 | 12,925 | 153,273 | 2,965 | 280 87 156,238 |
||
| of which eligible debt securities of which other debt securities |
19,476 5,694 |
9,768 14,015 |
42,691 39,178 |
5,272 3,640 |
8,485 4,379 |
85,692 66,906 |
1,588 1,377 |
68 283 , |
||
| Equity instruments | 50,445 | 8,758 | 59,203 | , 59,203 |
||||||
| Derivatives | 29,756 | 13,798 | 30,490 | 29,822 | 1,002 | 104,868 | 104,868 | |||
| Financial assets – policyholders bearing the risk |
283,420 | 283,420 | 283,420 | |||||||
| Financial assets atfair value | 55,481 | 37,593 | 112,402 | 38,739 | 50,445 | 306,106 | 600,766 | 2,965 | 603,731 | |
| Other | 1 | 33,571 | 446 | 1,496 | 218 | 24,462 | 186,110 | 246,304 | 43 | 32 140 246,347 |
| of which otherfinancial assets | 32,066 | 30 | 1 | 32,097 | 43 | , | ||||
| Total assets of which accrued interest loans |
181,122 | 415,991 | 358,278 | 804,236 | 172,678 | 74,907 1,783 |
492,769 | 2,499,981 1,783 |
59,615 | 783 1 2,559,596 , |
| of which accrued interest debt securities |
812 | 812 | 812 | |||||||
| Deposits from central banks and creditinstitutions |
30,673 | 52,262 | 2,280 | 1,962 | 1,756 | 287 | 89,220 | –144 | 731 89,076 |
|
| of which repos | 731 | 731 | –1 | |||||||
| General governments Households |
8,359 273,661 |
4,700 19,500 |
114 6,111 |
189 1,090 |
3,636 5 |
16,998 300,367 |
–104 –48 |
16,894 | ||
| Corporates | 592,036 | 56,540 | 5,386 | 22,500 | 11,647 | 688,109 | –601 | 300,319 687,508 |
||
| Deposits and borrowings | ||||||||||
| from the public | 874,056 | 80,740 | 11,611 | 23,779 | 15,288 | 1,005,474 | –753 | 491 915 1,004,721 |
||
| of which deposits | 383,696 | 94,069 | 4,881 | 3,690 | 5,878 | 492,214 | –299 | 6 364 , |
||
| of which borrowing of which repos |
6,216 5,889 |
20 | 138 | 6,374 5,889 |
–10 –6 |
883 5 , |
||||
| Liabilities to policyholders | 284,291 | 284,291 | , 284,291 |
|||||||
| Certificates | 46,451 | 28,830 | 8,584 | 83,865 | –796 | 83,069 | ||||
| Covered bonds Other bonds3) |
9,687 21,810 |
64,469 14,564 |
230,748 163,499 |
41,232 4,306 |
346,136 204,179 |
–12,864 –6,487 |
333,272 197,692 |
|||
| Debt securities issued | 77,948 | 107,863 | 402,831 | 45,538 | 634,180 | –20,147 | 614,033 | |||
| Debt securities | 508 | 416 | 6,772 | 3,711 | 11,407 | –598 | 10,809 | |||
| Equity instruments | 14,228 | 14,228 | 14,228 | |||||||
| Derivatives | 30,622 | 14,334 | 23,634 | 16,146 | 696 | 85,432 | 85,432 | |||
| Otherliabilities | 1,450 | 2,170 | 231 | 3,851 | –9 | 3,842 | ||||
| Financial liabilities atfair value | 32,580 | 16,920 | 30,637 | 19,857 | 14,228 | 696 | 114,920 | –607 | 114,313 | |
| Other of which otherfinancial |
238 | 51,065 | 1,099 | 530 | 180 | 21,454 | 202,337 | 276,903 | –56 | 276,847 929 47 |
| liabilities | 47,902 | 17 | 4 | 62 | 47,985 | –56 | , | |||
| Subordinated liabilities | 275 | 41,036 | 41,311 | –8,921 | 32,390 | |||||
| Equity | 143,925 | 143,925 | 143,925 | |||||||
| Total Liabilities and Equity of which accrued interest |
904,967 | 294,870 | 139,773 | 459,739 | 123,655 | 179,607 | 487,611 | 2,590,224 | –30,628 | 2,559,596 328 1 |
| deposits and borrowing | 1,328 | 1,328 | , | |||||||
| of which accrued interest issued securities |
4,227 | 4,227 | 227 4 , |
|||||||
| Obligations | ||||||||||
| Loan commitments | 13,129 | 106,972 | 47,541 | 223,644 | 7,307 | 100 | 398,693 | 398,693 | ||
| Acceptances and other financialfacilities |
12 | 22,890 | 37,497 | 23,213 | 30,671 | 114,283 | 114,283 | |||
| Operating lease commitments | 158 | 763 | 979 | 75 | 1,975 | 1,975 | ||||
| Total liabilities, equity | ||||||||||
| and obligations | 918,108 | 424,890 | 225,574 | 707,575 | 161,633 | 179,782 | 487,611 | 3,105,175 | –30,628 | 3,074,547 |
| Group, 2016 | |
|---|---|
| ------------- | -- |
| Balance sheet (contractual maturity dates) |
Payable on demand | <3 months | 1) 3–12 months | 1–5 years | >5 years | Not distributed |
Insurance 2) |
Subtotal | Discount effect |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash and cash balances with central banks Loans to central banks Loans to creditinstitutions of which eligible debt securities of which repos General governments |
151,078 24 5,898 476 |
66,366 29,142 795 1,428 |
289 7,001 380 7,385 |
6,949 19,763 |
993 4,164 |
118 1 |
314 117 |
151,078 66,679 50,415 380 912 33,217 |
51 112 2 2 1,613 |
151,078 66,730 382 50,527 914 34,830 |
| Households Corporates |
793 44,124 |
62,012 161,309 |
167,270 148,752 |
258,432 375,423 |
40,261 101,650 |
182 3,211 |
528,950 834,469 |
20,227 34,543 |
549,177 869,012 |
|
| Loans to the public of which eligible debt securities of which other debt securities of which repos Debt securities of which eligible debt securities of which other debt securities Equity instruments Derivatives Financial assets – policyholders bearing the risk |
45,393 | 224,749 7 63,242 18,041 5,296 12,008 41,208 |
323,407 7 16,605 8,267 8,328 24,972 |
653,618 9,614 214 109,411 46,779 62,577 50,328 |
146,075 2,697 1,562 13,876 9,534 4,323 39,429 |
3,394 43,436 |
76,955 43,805 32,587 30,737 56,418 295,908 |
1,396,636 12,311 1,790 63,242 234,888 113,681 119,823 74,173 212,355 295,908 |
56,383 385 106 282 3,449 1,710 1,739 |
12 696 1,453,019 896 1 524 63 , , 391 115 , 238,337 121 562 , , 74,173 212,355 295,908 |
| Financial assets atfair value | 59,249 | 41,577 | 159,739 | 53,305 | 43,436 | 460,018 | 817,324 | 3,449 | 820,773 | |
| Other of which otherfinancial assets |
44 | 37,883 36,717 |
390 14 |
1,575 44 |
178 52 |
32,079 3 |
6,341 126 |
78,490 36,956 |
29 29 |
985 36 78,519 , |
| Total assets of which accrued interestloans of which accrued interest debt |
202,437 | 417,389 | 372,664 | 821,881 | 200,551 | 79,027 2,093 |
466,673 | 2,560,622 2,093 |
60,024 | 2 093 2,620,646 1 516 , |
| securities | 1,516 | 1,516 | , | |||||||
| Deposits from central banks and creditinstitutions of which repos |
25,058 | 61,155 737 |
20,449 | 2,180 | 2,234 | 8,892 118 |
119,968 855 |
–104 | 855 119,864 |
|
| General governments Households Corporates |
26,590 239,979 536,292 |
2,884 29,446 64,501 |
1,676 6,214 9,111 |
438 1,135 23,609 |
4,255 2 16,749 |
35,843 276,776 650,262 |
–113 –52 –688 |
35,730 276,724 649,574 |
||
| Deposits and borrowings from the public of which deposits of which borrowing of which repos Liabilities to policyholders Certificates |
802,861 369,042 47 |
96,831 69,732 1,067 740 61,960 |
17,001 6,271 9 62,700 |
25,182 2,815 13 2,826 |
21,006 9,253 159 |
296,618 | 962,881 457,113 1,248 740 296,618 127,533 |
–853 –324 –5 –1 –1,058 |
789 456 962,028 243 1 739 , , 296,618 126,475 |
|
| Covered bonds Other bonds3) |
1,366 8,519 |
44,857 21,004 |
257,656 181,004 |
36,727 13,141 |
340,606 223,668 |
–13,621 –8,248 |
326,985 215,420 |
|||
| Issued securities Debt securities Equity instruments Derivatives Otherliabilities |
47 | 71,845 155 41,687 1,338 |
128,561 53 21,073 1,656 |
441,486 6,270 41,146 16,378 |
49,868 3,661 24,203 |
10,071 | 46,542 | 691,807 10,139 10,071 174,651 19,372 |
–22,927 –590 –147 |
668,880 9,549 10,071 174,651 19,225 |
| Financial liabilities atfair value Other |
97 | 43,180 41,826 |
22,782 259 |
63,794 598 |
27,864 2,128 |
10,071 20,735 |
46,542 112,459 |
214,233 178,102 |
–737 –37 |
213,496 178,065 |
| of which otherfinancial liabilities Subordinated liabilities Equity |
38,768 510 |
54 | 282 | 1,240 52,231 |
2 140,976 |
76 | 40,422 52,741 140,976 |
–37 –12,022 |
40 385 , 40,719 140,976 |
|
| Total Liabilities and Equity of which accrued interest deposits and borrowing of which accrued interest issued securities |
828,063 | 315,347 | 189,052 | 533,240 | 155,331 | 171,782 1,971 4,772 |
464,511 | 2,657,326 1,971 4,772 |
–36,680 | 2,620,646 971 1 772 4 , , |
| Obligations | ||||||||||
| Loan commitments Acceptances and other financialfacilities |
12,715 | 116,411 49,228 |
38,625 26,064 |
228,258 15,771 |
23,420 20,436 |
39 | 419,429 111,538 |
419,429 111,538 |
||
| Operating lease commitments Total liabilities, equity |
109 | 286 | 441 | 912 | 44 | 1,792 | 1,792 |
1) Includes items available overnight.
2) The cash flows from insurance assets are monitored on a regular basis in orderto be sufficientto meetthe cash flows from the insurance liabilities at alltimes.
3) TheGroup issues equity index-linked bonds, which contains both a liability and an equity component. TheGroup has chosen to designate issued equity index-linked bonds, with a fair value amounting to SEK 24,388m (30,992), as atfair value through profit orloss, since they contain embedded derivatives. The corresponding amountforthe parent company is SEK 23,356m (28,940). This choice implies thatthe entire hybrid contractis measured atfair value through profit orloss. Fair value forthose financial instruments is calculated using a valuation technique, exclusively based on quoted market prices. TheGroup's contractual liability is SEK 22,190m(28,871) and forthe parent company SEK 21,323m (27,111). The accumulated impact from reflecting theGroup's own credit standing in the fair value measurement amounts to SEK 264m (230), of which SEK –33m(–53) relates to 2017. The corresponding amountforthe parent company is SEK 205m (148), of which SEK 57m (–50) relates to 2017.
and obligations 840,887 481,272 254,182 778,181 199,231 171,821 464,511 3,190,085 –36,680 3,153,405
Parent company, 2017
| Balance sheet (contractual maturity dates) |
Payable on demand | <3 months | 1) 3–12 months | 1–5 years | >5 years | Not distributed |
Subtotal | Discount effect | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash and cash balances with central banks Loans to creditinstitutions of which repos |
97,927 | 155,606 390 |
20,321 | 16,309 | 584 | 97,927 192,821 390 |
–186 –230 |
97,741 389 192,591 |
|
| General governments Households Corporates |
204 | 9,940 28,395 230,953 |
4,756 143,480 120,579 |
2,938 327,566 295,854 |
170 14,829 56,103 |
17,804 514,270 703,694 |
–244 –17,161 –21,538 |
17,560 497,108 682,156 |
|
| Loans to the public of which eligible debt securities of which repos Debt securities of which eligible debt securities of which other debt securities Equity instruments Derivatives |
204 | 269,288 135 42,413 23,531 18,334 5,197 29,649 |
268,815 4,477 23,555 6,772 16,783 14,585 |
626,358 2,562 65,631 24,518 41,113 30,459 |
71,102 7,537 3,370 4,166 29,527 |
100,665 | 1,235,767 7,174 42,413 120,254 52,994 67,260 100,665 104,220 |
–38,943 –164 –183 –2,194 –862 –1,332 |
010 7 1,196,824 42 230 , 52 132 , 118,060 928 65 , , 100,665 104,220 |
| Financial assets atfair value Other of which otherfinancial assets |
53,179 35,343 |
38,140 | 96,090 | 37,064 874 |
100,665 45,845 45,845 |
325,139 82,062 45,845 |
–2,194 | 322,946 845 45 82,062 , |
|
| Total assets of which accrued interest loans of which accrued interest debt securities |
98,131 | 513,417 | 327,276 | 738,757 | 109,625 | 146,510 1,521 689 |
1,933,716 1,521 689 |
–41,553 | 521 1 1,892,163 689 , |
| Deposits by creditinstitutions | 28,144 | 74,418 | 14,352 | 9,089 | 1,785 | 127,789 | –250 | 730 127,539 |
|
| of which repos General governments Households Corporates |
2,088 214,857 516,502 |
730 4,298 9,555 62,527 |
2,163 2,187 |
362 3,413 |
1,421 4,372 |
730 7,808 226,938 589,001 |
–26 –445 –1,123 |
7,781 226,493 587,878 |
|
| Deposits and borrowings from the public of which deposits of which borrowing of which repos Certificates Covered bonds Other bonds1) |
733,446 708,714 |
76,380 94,896 6,215 4,913 46,387 9,689 21,652 |
4,351 4,351 28,844 62,040 14,572 |
3,775 3,775 8,601 231,032 163,630 |
5,794 5,794 41,459 3,588 |
823,746 817,529 6,215 4,913 83,833 344,219 203,442 |
–1,594 –1,590 –3 –2 –841 –13,578 –6,783 |
815 940 822,151 212 6 910 4 , , , 82,992 330,641 196,659 |
|
| Issued securities Debt securities Equity instruments Derivatives Otherliabilities |
77,728 833 31,215 1,121 |
105,457 83 14,919 2,491 |
403,263 6,531 23,887 229 |
45,047 3,361 16,969 |
14,228 | 631,495 10,809 14,228 86,990 3,842 |
–21,202 | 610,292 10,809 14,228 86,990 3,842 |
|
| Financial liabilities atfair value Other of which otherfinancial liabilities Subordinated liabilities Untaxed reserves Equity |
33,170 48,581 48,581 275 |
17,494 | 30,647 | 20,330 15 15 41,008 |
14,228 9,134 21,429 104,762 |
115,869 57,731 48,597 41,282 21,429 104,762 |
–8,892 | 115,869 48 597 57,731 , 32,390 21,429 104,762 |
|
| Total Liabilities and Equity of which accrued interest deposits and borrowing of which accrued interest issued securities |
761,590 | 310,552 | 141,654 | 446,774 | 113,979 | 149,553 826 7,016 |
1,924,102 826 7,016 |
–31,939 | 1,892,163 826 016 7 , |
| Obligations | |||||||||
| Loan commitments Acceptances and otherfinancialfacilities |
36,566 22,256 |
42,616 34,846 |
184,404 19,859 |
3,818 26,098 |
267,403 103,059 |
267,403 103,059 |
|||
| Total liabilities, equity and obligations | 761,590 | 369,502 | 219,630 | 657,421 | 145,764 | 149,553 | 2,303,460 | –40,835 | 2,262,625 |
Parent company, 2016
| Balance sheet (contractual maturity dates) |
Payable on demand | < 3 months1) 3–12 months | 1–5 years | >5 years | Not distributed |
Subtotal | Discount effect | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash and cash balances with central banks Loans to creditinstitutions of which repos |
70,805 21,453 |
173,899 1,237 |
34,792 | 57,157 | 205 | 70,805 287,506 1,237 |
–134 –447 –1 |
70,671 236 1 287,059 |
|
| General governments Households |
192 749 |
491 48,479 |
1,402 167,027 |
7,175 262,740 |
176 12,472 |
9,436 491,467 |
–354 –15,195 |
, 9,082 476,272 |
|
| Corporates | 46,693 | 146,375 | 126,379 | 320,381 | 71,977 | 711,805 | –25,064 | 686,741 | |
| Loans to the public of which eligible debt securities of which other debt securities of which repos Debt securities of which eligible debt securities |
47,634 | 195,345 63,809 14,232 2,835 |
294,808 12,378 3,939 |
590,296 6,992 229 95,325 27,282 |
84,625 1,872 12,287 7,400 |
1,212,708 6,992 2,101 63,809 134,222 41,456 |
–40,613 –302 –220 –286 –2,901 –1,057 |
690 6 1,172,095 881 1 523 63 , , 399 40 , 131,321 90 261 , |
|
| of which other debt securities Equity instruments Derivatives |
10,733 41,897 |
8,439 25,173 |
67,986 54,028 |
4,887 38,675 |
93,775 | 92,045 93,775 159,773 |
–1,784 | , 93,775 159,773 |
|
| Financial assets atfair value Other |
56,129 36,507 |
37,551 77 |
149,353 267 |
50,962 585 |
93,775 47,714 |
387,770 85,150 |
–2,901 | 384,869 37 436 85,150 |
|
| of which otherfinancial assets | 36,507 | 77 | 267 | 585 | 37,436 | , | |||
| Total assets of which accrued interestloans |
139,892 | 461,880 | 367,228 | 797,073 | 136,377 | 141,489 1,627 |
2,043,939 1,627 |
–44,095 | 627 1 1,999,844 793 , |
| of which accrued interest debt securities | 793 | 793 | |||||||
| Deposits by creditinstitutions | 63,648 | 62,763 | 27,022 | 13,539 | 2,326 | 169,298 | –446 | 737 168,852 |
|
| of which repos General governments |
21,110 | 738 109 |
338 | 229 | 2,179 | 738 23,965 |
–1 –75 |
23,890 | |
| Households Corporates |
195,909 481,242 |
12,432 54,574 |
1,674 4,450 |
420 2,549 |
6,971 | 210,435 549,786 |
–408 –1,119 |
210,027 548,667 |
|
| Deposits and borrowings from the public of which deposits of which borrowing |
698,261 698,261 |
67,115 66,048 1,066 |
6,462 6,462 |
3,198 3,198 |
9,150 9,150 |
784,186 783,119 1,066 |
–1,602 –1,601 –1 |
781 518 782,584 1 065 739 , , |
|
| of which repos Certificates Covered bonds Other bonds2) |
739 61,939 1,366 8,417 |
62,704 44,878 20,942 |
2,825 255,635 181,042 |
36,682 11,413 |
739 127,468 338,561 221,814 |
–1,104 –14,123 –8,430 |
126,364 324,438 213,384 |
||
| Issued securities | 71,722 | 128,524 | 439,502 | 48,095 | 687,843 | –23,657 | 664,186 | ||
| Debt securities Equity instruments |
178 | 29 | 6,037 | 3,305 24,879 |
10,072 | 9,549 10,072 133,833 |
9,549 10,072 133,833 |
||
| Derivatives Otherliabilities |
42,400 1,313 |
21,163 1,675 |
45,391 16,236 |
19,224 | 19,224 | ||||
| Financial liabilities atfair value Other of which otherfinancial liabilities |
43,891 37,845 37,845 |
22,867 22 22 |
67,664 | 28,184 | 10,072 9,823 |
172,678 47,690 37,867 |
172,678 867 37 47,690 , |
||
| Subordinated liabilities Untaxed reserves Equity |
510 | 54,143 | 21,761 101,374 |
54,653 21,761 101,374 |
–13,934 | 40,719 21,761 101,374 |
|||
| Total Liabilities and Equity of which accrued interest deposits and |
761,909 | 283,846 | 184,897 | 523,903 | 141,898 | 143,030 | 2,039,483 | –39,639 | 1,999,844 223 1 768 4 |
| Loan commitments Acceptances and otherfinancialfacilities |
43,549 38,577 |
33,522 16,968 |
189,699 8,398 |
19,467 10,470 |
286,237 74,413 |
286,237 74,413 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total liabilities, equity and obligations | 761,909 | 365,972 | 235,387 | 722,000 | 171,835 | 143,030 2,400,133 |
–39,639 | 2,360,494 |
1) Includes items available overnight.
2) TheGroup issues equity index-linked bonds, which contains both a liability and an equity component. TheGroup has chosen to designate issued equity index-linked bonds, with a fair value amounting to SEK 24,388m (30,992), as atfair value through profit orloss, since they contain embedded derivatives. The corresponding amountforthe parent company is SEK 23,356m (28,940). This choice implies thatthe entire hybrid contractis measured atfair value through profit orloss. Fair value forthose financial instruments is calculated using a valuation technique, exclusively based on quoted market prices. TheGroup's contractual liability is SEK 22,190m (28,871) and forthe parent company SEK 21,323m(27,111). The accumulated impactfromreflecting theGroup's own credit standing in the fair value measurement amounts to SEK 264m (230), of which SEK –33m(–53) relates to 2017. The corresponding amountforthe parent company is SEK 205m (148), of which SEK –57m (–50) relates to 2017.
| Group | Parent company | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average remaining maturity (years) | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 |
| Loans to creditinstitutions | 0.95 | 0.78 | 0.45 | 0.81 |
| Loans to the public | 2.63 | 2.72 | 2.26 | 2.36 |
| Deposits from creditinstitutions | 0.35 | 0.41 | 0.64 | 0.83 |
| Deposits from the public | 0.17 | 0.24 | 0.90 | 1.32 |
| Borrowing from the public | 0.34 | 1.39 | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Certificates | 0.58 | 0.43 | 0.59 | 0.43 |
| Covered bonds | 3.25 | 3.38 | 3.33 | 3.37 |
| Other bonds | 2.65 | 3.04 | 2.65 | 2.99 |
18 Cash and cash equivalents
| Group | Parent company | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | |
| Cash Cash balances at central banks Other demand deposits 1) |
1,960 175,262 7,207 |
1,957 149,121 7,237 |
132 97,609 28,546 |
156 70,515 21,261 |
| TOTAL | 184,429 | 158,315 | 126,287 | 91,932 |
1) Balance receivables on demand with creditinstitutions.
19 Loans
| Group | Parent company | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | |
| Loans to creditinstitutions 1) Loans to the public 1) |
34,715 1,484,803 |
50,527 1,453,019 |
192,591 1,196,824 |
287,059 1,172,095 |
| TOTAL | 1,519,518 | 1,503,546 | 1,389,415 | 1,459,154 |
1) Including debtinstruments classified as Loans.
| Loans | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Performing loans | 1,515,711 | 1,500,692 | 1,386,227 | 1,457,416 |
| Individually assessed impaired loans | 5,999 | 5,037 | 4,629 | 3,228 |
| Portfolio assessed loans, past due > 60 days | 2,273 | 2,597 | 667 | 720 |
| Portfolio assessed loans,restructured | 11 | 9 | ||
| Non-performing loans | 8,283 | 7,643 | 5,296 | 3,948 |
| Loans priorto reserves | 1,523,995 | 1,508,335 | 1,391,523 | 1,461,364 |
| Specific reserves forindividually assessed loans | –2,187 | –1,928 | –1,384 | –1,044 |
| Collective reserves forindividually assessed loans | –1,120 | –1,539 | –455 | –908 |
| Collective reserves for portfolio assessed loans | –1,170 | –1,322 | –269 | –258 |
| Reserves | –4,476 | –4,789 | –2,108 | –2,210 |
| TOTAL | 1,519,518 | 1,503,546 | 1,389,415 | 1,459,154 |
| Specific and collective reserves | –4,476 | –4,789 | –2,108 | –2,210 |
| Contingentliabilities reserves | –75 | –44 | –47 | |
| TOTALRESERVES | –4,552 | –4,833 | –2,155 | –2,210 |
| Gross level ofimpaired loans | 0.39% | 0.33% | 0.33% | 0.22% |
| Netlevel ofimpaired loans | 0.25% | 0.21% | 0.23% | 0.15% |
| Specific reserve ratio forindividually assessed impaired loans | 36.5% | 38.3% | 29.9% | 32.3% |
| Totalreserve ratio forindividually assessed impaired loans | 55.1% | 68.8% | 39.7% | 60.5% |
| Reserve ratio for collectively assessed loans | 51.2% | 50.7% | 40.3% | 35.8% |
| NPL coverage ratio | 54.9% | 63.2% | 40.7% | 56.0% |
| NPL per cent oflending | 0.54% | 0.51% | 0.38% | 0.27% |
Loans by category of borrower
| Group, 2017 | Credit institutions |
Corporates | Real Estate Management andHousing co-operative associations |
Public Administration |
Households | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Performing loans | 34,715 | 562,338 | 301,861 | 41,571 | 575,226 | 999 5 1,515,711 |
| Individually assessed impaired loans Portfolio assessed loans, past due > 60 days Portfolio assessed loans,restructured Non-performing loans |
5,328 223 5,551 |
578 14 592 |
92 2,037 11 2,139 |
2 273 , 11 , 8,283 |
||
| Loans priorto reserves | 34,715 | 567,889 | 302,453 | 41,571 | 577,366 | 1,523,994 |
| Specific reserves forindividually assessed impaired loans Collective reserves forindividually assessed loans Collective reserves for portfolio assessed loans |
–1,842 –1,042 –149 |
–282 –68 –6 |
–5 | –63 –5 –1,014 |
–2,187 –1,120 –1,170 |
|
| Reserves | –3,034 | –355 | –5 | –1,083 | –4,476 | |
| TOTAL | 34,715 | 564,855 | 302,098 | 41,566 | 576,283 | 1,519,518 |
2016
| Performing loans | 50,527 | 567,810 | 299,617 | 34,835 | 547,903 | 037 5 1,500,692 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Individually assessed impaired loans Portfolio assessed loans, past due > 60 days Portfolio assessed loans,restructured |
3,812 163 |
1,066 | 159 2,434 9 |
2 597 9 , , |
||
| Non-performing loans | 3,975 | 1,066 | 2,602 | 7,643 | ||
| Loans priorto reserves | 50,527 | 571,785 | 300,683 | 34,835 | 550,505 | 1,508,335 |
| Specific reserves forindividually assessed impaired loans Collective reserves forindividually assessed loans Collective reserves for portfolio assessed loans |
–1,391 –1,446 –91 |
–441 –86 |
–5 | –96 –2 –1,231 |
–1,928 –1,539 –1,322 |
|
| Reserves | –2,928 | –527 | –5 | –1,329 | –4,789 | |
| TOTAL | 50,527 | 568,857 | 300,156 | 34,830 | 549,176 | 1,503,546 |
| Parent company, 2017 | Credit institutions |
Corporates | Real Estate Management andHousing co-operative associations |
Public Administration |
Households | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Performing loans | 192,591 | 422,955 | 256,409 | 17,563 | 496,708 | 1,386,227 |
| Individually assessed impaired loans Portfolio assessed loans, past due > 60 days Non-performing loans |
4,534 65 4,599 |
36 14 51 |
59 588 647 |
629 4 667 , 5,296 |
||
| Loans priorto reserves | 192,591 | 427,553 | 256,460 | 17,563 | 497,355 | 1,391,523 |
| Specific reserves forindividually assessed impaired loans Collective reserves forindividually assessed loans Collective reserves for portfolio assessed loans |
–1,309 –451 –59 |
–32 –6 |
–4 | –42 –204 |
–1,384 –455 –269 |
|
| Reserves | –1,819 | –38 | –4 | –246 | –2,108 | |
| TOTAL | 192,591 | 425,734 | 256,422 | 17,560 | 497,108 | 1,389,415 |
| 2016 | ||||||
| Performing loans | 286,936 | 440,508 | 245,092 | 9,086 | 475,794 | 228 3 1,457,416 |
| Individually assessed impaired loans Portfolio assessed loans, past due > 60 days Non-performing loans |
123 123 |
2,856 2,856 |
187 187 |
62 720 782 |
720 , 3,948 |
|
| Loans priorto reserves | 287,059 | 443,364 | 245,279 | 9,086 | 476,576 | 1,461,364 |
| Specific reserves forindividually assessed impaired loans Collective reserves forindividually assessed loans Collective reserves for portfolio assessed loans |
–880 –904 |
–118 | –4 | –46 –258 |
–1,044 –908 –258 |
|
| Reserves | –1,784 | –118 | –4 | –304 | –2,210 | |
| TOTAL | 287,059 | 441,580 | 245,161 | 9,082 | 476,272 | 1,459,154 |
Loans by geographicalregion 1)
| Group, 2017 | The Nordic region | Germany | The Baltic region |
Other | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Performing loans | 1,238,046 | 98,261 | 128,841 | 50,564 | 999 5 1,515,711 |
| Individually assessed impaired loans Portfolio assessed loans, past due > 60 days Portfolio assessed loans,restructured |
4,538 1,245 |
151 | 1,218 1,029 11 |
92 | 2 273 11 , , |
| Non-performing loans | 5,782 | 151 | 2,258 | 92 | 8,283 |
| Loans priorto reserves | 1,243,828 | 98,412 | 131,099 | 50,656 | 1,523,995 |
| Specific reserves forindividually assessed impaired loans Collective reserves forindividually assessed loans Collective reserves for portfolio assessed loans |
–1,394 –905 –537 |
–106 –67 |
–654 –142 –633 |
–34 –6 |
–2,187 –1,120 –1,170 |
| Reserves | –2,836 | –173 | –1,428 | –40 | –4,476 |
| TOTAL | 1,240,992 | 98,239 | 129,671 | 50,616 | 1,519,518 |
| 2016 |
| Performing loans | 1,218,235 | 113,641 | 115,771 | 53,045 | 037 5 1,500,692 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Individually assessed impaired loans Portfolio assessed loans, past due > 60 days Portfolio assessed loans,restructured |
2,967 1,310 |
463 | 1,469 1,287 9 |
138 | 2 597 9 , , |
| Non-performing loans | 4,277 | 463 | 2,765 | 138 | 7,643 |
| Loans priorto reserves | 1,222,512 | 114,104 | 118,536 | 53,183 | 1,508,335 |
| Specific reserves forindividually assessed impaired loans Collective reserves forindividually assessed loans Collective reserves for portfolio assessed loans |
–985 –1,108 –535 |
–158 –69 |
–748 –236 –787 |
–37 –126 |
–1,928 –1,539 –1,322 |
| Reserves | –2,628 | –227 | –1,771 | –163 | –4,789 |
| TOTAL | 1,219,884 | 113,877 | 116,765 | 53,020 | 1,503,546 |
| Parent company, 2017 | The Nordic region | Germany | The Baltic region |
Other | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Performing loans | 1,347,709 | 38,518 | 629 4 1,386,227 |
||
| Individually assessed impaired loans Portfolio assessed loans, past due > 60 days |
4,538 667 |
92 | 667 , |
||
| Non-performing loans | 5,205 | 92 | 5,296 | ||
| Loans priorto reserves | 1,352,913 | 38,610 | 1,391,523 | ||
| Specific reserves forindividually assessed impaired loans | –1,350 | –34 | –1,384 | ||
| Collective reserves forindividually assessed loans | –450 | –5 | –455 | ||
| Collective reserves for portfolio assessed loans | –269 | –269 | |||
| Reserves | –2,069 | –39 | –2,108 | ||
| TOTAL | 1,350,844 | 38,571 | 1,389,415 | ||
| 2016 | |||||
| Performing loans | 1,413,794 | 43,622 | 228 3 1,457,416 |
||
| Individually assessed impaired loans Portfolio assessed loans, past due > 60 days |
2,967 720 |
261 | 720 , |
||
| Non-performing loans | 3,687 | 261 | 3,948 | ||
| Loans priorto reserves | 1,417,481 | 43,883 | 1,461,364 | ||
| Specific reserves forindividually assessed impaired loans | –932 | –112 | –1,044 |
Collective reserves for portfolio assessed loans –258 –258 Reserves –1,973 –237 –2,210 TOTAL 1,415,508 43,646 1,459,154
Collective reserves forindividually assessed loans –783 –125 –908
1) The geographical distribution is based on where loans are booked.
Past due loans that are notimpaired
| Group | Parent company | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Corporates | Households | Other | Total | Corporates | Households | Other | Total |
| < 30 days 2) 31 – 60 days >60 days1) |
4,855 154 316 |
4,219 423 322 |
48 2 3 |
9,122 579 641 |
2,126 67 114 |
2,870 228 99 |
6 2 |
5,001 295 214 |
| TOTAL | 5,325 | 4,965 | 52 | 10,342 | 2,306 | 3,197 | 7 | 5,510 |
| 2016 | ||||||||
| < 30 days 31 – 60 days >60 days1) |
3,967 836 517 |
1,609 671 286 |
21 11 |
5,597 1,518 803 |
2,981 726 213 |
341 414 41 |
1 | 3,323 1,140 254 |
| TOTAL | 5,320 | 2,566 | 32 | 7,918 | 3,920 | 796 | 1 | 4,717 |
1) Excluding portfolio assessed loans past due more than 60 days which are included in previous table.
2) The increase in 2017 <30 days is mainly related to past due volumes less than 5 days. These volumes were notincluded in the figures for 2016.
| Reserves,Group | |
|---|---|
| Loans to creditinstitutions | Loans to the public | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Specific loan loss reserves 1) | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 |
| Opening balance Reversals for utilisation Provisions Reversals Exchange rate differences |
0 | 0 | –1,928 318 –1,309 760 –27 |
–2,044 584 –734 338 –72 |
–1,928 318 –1,309 760 –27 |
–2,044 584 –734 338 –72 |
| Closing balance | 0 | 0 | –2,187 | –1,928 | –2,187 | –1,928 |
| Collective loan loss reserves 2) | ||||||
| Opening balance Net provisions Exchange rate differences |
0 | –7 7 |
–2,861 592 –21 |
–2,827 35 –69 |
–2,861 592 –21 |
–2,834 42 –69 |
| Closing balance | 0 | 0 | –2,290 | –2,861 | –2,290 | –2,861 |
| Contingentliabilities reserves | ||||||
| Opening balance Net provisions Reversalfor utilisation |
0 | 0 | –44 –30 |
–81 43 |
–44 –30 |
–81 43 |
| Exchange rate differences | –1 | –6 | –1 | –6 | ||
| Closing balance | 0 | 0 | –75 | –44 | –75 | –44 |
| TOTAL | 0 | 0 | –4,552 | –4,833 | –4,552 | –4,833 |
1) Specific reserves forindividually appraised loans.
2) Collective reserves forindividually appraised loans,reserves forloans assessed on a portfolio basis and country risk reserves.
Reserves, parent company
| Loans to creditinstitutions | Loans to the public | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Specific loan loss reserves 1) | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 |
| Opening balance Reversals for utilisation Provisions Reversals Exchange rate differences |
0 | 0 | –1,044 180 –1,190 625 45 |
–775 60 –407 102 –24 |
–1,044 180 –1,190 625 45 |
–775 60 –407 102 –24 |
| Closing balance | 0 | 0 | –1,384 | –1,044 | –1,384 | –1,044 |
| Collective loan loss reserves 2) | ||||||
| Opening balance Net provisions Exchange rate differences |
0 | –8 7 1 |
–1,166 429 13 |
–962 –195 –9 |
–1,166 429 13 |
–970 –188 –8 |
| Closing balance | 0 | 0 | –724 | –1,166 | –724 | –1,166 |
| Contingentliabilities reserves | ||||||
| Opening balance Net provisions |
0 | 0 | 0 –47 |
–22 22 |
0 –47 |
–22 22 |
| Closing balance | 0 | 0 | –47 | 0 | –47 | 0 |
| TOTAL | 0 | 0 | –2,155 | –2,210 | –2,155 | –2,210 |
1) Specific reserves forindividually appraised loans.
2) Collective reserves forindividually appraised loans,reserves forloans assessed on a portfolio basis and country risk reserves.
Forborne loans
| Group | Parent company | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | |
| Totalforborne loans of which performing1) |
14,640 6,995 |
11,990 6,327 |
10,948 5,373 |
6,927 3,883 |
1)According to EBAdefinition.
20 Capital adequacy
Capital management
SEB takes various types ofrisks in line with the bank's strategy and business plan. In orderto sustain these risks and guarantee SEB's long-term survival, the bank must maintain satisfactory capital strength. Atthe same time, SEB must balance the trade-off between financialreward and overallrisk toler ance. In particular, SEB's capital management balances the following dimensions:
-
- regulatory:the minimum capital levels, and the supervisory expectation that banks operate safely above this minimum level, established by the EU directives through Swedish law on capital adequacy,
-
- access to debtinvestors:the capitalisation levelrequired to support a certain rating level in orderto reach a debtinvestor base necessary for conducting SEB's business activities,
-
- access to financial products:the capital levelrequired by corporate cli ents and other counterparties to facilitate the bank's activity in the capital markets, including derivatives and foreign exchange, and
-
- optimalreturn on equity:the balance between the shareholders' expected return on capital and risks taken.
To meet expectations of shareholders, supervisors and market participants, SEB's capitalisation is based on an assessment of allrisks incurred in SEB's business, and forward-looking, aligned with long- and short-term business plans and with expected macroeconomic developments. Furthermore,the capitalisation is stress-tested to identify the potential effect of adverse changes to SEB's financial situation.
Internal capital adequacy assessment process
The internal capital adequacy assessment process (ICAAP) encompasses SEB's internal views on materialrisks and their development as well as risk measurement models,risk governance and risk mitigants. Itis linked to over all business planning and establishes a strategy for maintaining appropriate capital levels. Together with continuous monitoring and reporting ofthe capital adequacy to the Board,this ensures thatthe relationship between share holders' equity, economic capital,regulatory and rating-based requirements are managed so thatthe bank's survival is notjeopardised. Thus,the ICAAP is integrated with SEB's business planning, internal governance framework and internal control systems.
SEB's capital plan covers the strategic planning horizon and projects eco nomic and legal capitalrequirements, as well as available capitalresources and relevantratios. Itis forward-looking,taking into account current and planned business volumes as well as strategic initiatives. The capital plan is stress tested to potential down-turns in the macroeconomic environment,to strategic risk factors identified in the business planning, and to otherrelevant scenarios. The capital plan is established annually, and updated as needs arise during the year.
Economic capital constitutes an important part of capital adequacy assessment. Itis an internal measurement ofrisk, similarto the rules for capital adequacy in that many ofthe underlying risk components are the same. The economic capital calculation is based on a confidence level of 99.97 per cent, which is equivalentto the capitalrequirementfor a very high rating. The economic capital orinternally assessed capitalrequirementfor SEB Group including insurance risk amounted to SEK 64bn (63).
SEB employs an internal capital allocation framework for measuring return on risk, named business equity. Itis similarto regulatory capital models including Pillar 2 requirements and is calibrated with SEB's capitaltargets.
The regulatory supervisors annually assess SEB and its ICAAP in accordance with the parameters ofthe Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP). The assessment covers SEB's capital adequacy,risk measurement models and risk governance, among otherthings, and in the SREP 2017 it was concluded that SEB is sufficiently capitalised and adequately measures and manages risks.
Regulatory requirements
The requirements have evolved in the last few years, both in terms of which risks that are covered and in terms of the capital base components. The regu latory capitalrequirements are split in to Pillar 1 (general minimum requirements for all institutions) and Pillar 2 (requirements based on an individual assessment of each institution).
Pillar 1 requirements for CET1 is expressed as a REA ratio requirement and consists ofthe following components:
- i) a legal minimum requirement of 4.5 per cent,
- ii) a capital conservation buffer of 2.5 per cent,
- iii) a systemic risk buffer of 3.0 per cent, and
- iv) countercyclical buffers applied by the regulators in Sweden and Norway, together amounting to around 0.9 per centfor SEB.
The total Pillar 1 CET1 capitalrequirementfor SEB is at present 10.9 per cent.
As opposed to Pillar 1,the Pillar 2 requirements for CET1 are not calculated as a percentage ofthe total REA.As a result,the Pillar 2 requirements, expressed as capitalratio requirements (exceptthe systemic risk requirement), are likely to vary in relation to REAovertime. The Pillar 2 requirements consist ofthe following components:
- v) specific own funds requirementfor systemic risk ("Systemic risk requirement") expressed as a pure CET1 ratio requirement of 2.0 per cent,
- vi) risk weightfloorfor Swedish residential mortgages. The requirement corresponds to a capitalrequirement on the difference between REA using a 25 per centrisk weight on residential mortgage loans and actual Pillar 1 REA forthese loans (where the risk weightfor SEB is around 5 per cent, based on internal models), and
- vii) other specific risks. The risks currently identified by the Swedish FSA that apply to all Swedish banks are a) credit concentration risks, b) inter estrate risk in the banking book, c) pension risk, d) sovereign creditrisk and e) risks related to corporate exposure. In addition to this, SEB-spe cific requirements for otherrisks can be added as part ofthe SREP.
Together with the Pillar 2 CET1 capitalrequirements SEB's total CET1 capital requirements currently amounts to 17.2 per cent.
Ratio requirement (explicit orimplicit)
| Pillar 1 | CET1 | AT1 | Tier 2 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum requirement Capital conservation buffer Systemic risk buffer |
4.5% 2.5% 3.0% |
1.5% | 2.0% | 8.0% 2.5% 3.0% |
| Subtotal | 10.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | 13.5% |
| Countercyclical buffer | 0.9% | 0.9% | ||
| TOTAL | 10.9% | 1.5% | 2.0% | 14.4% |
| Pillar 2 | CET1 | AT1 | Tier 2 | Total |
| Systemic risk requirement Mortgage floor Credit concentration risk Interestrate risk in the banking book Pension risk Corporate exposures – PDscale Corporate exposures – maturity floor TOTAL |
2.0% 2.1% 0.3% 0.6% 0.5% 0.5% 0.3% 6.3% |
0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.5% |
0.3% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.7% |
2.0% 2.6% 0.5% 0.8% 0.7% 0.6% 0.4% 7.5% |
| Totalrequirement | 17.2% | 2.0% | 2.7% | 22.0% |
Note 20 continued Capital adequacy
Capital adequacy analysis
| Consolidated situation | Parent company | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | |
| Own funds Common Equity Tier 1 capital Tier 1 capital Total own funds |
118,204 132,127 147,849 |
114,419 129,157 151,491 |
101,810 115,733 131,328 |
97,144 111,882 134,384 |
| Own funds requirement Risk exposure amount Expressed as own funds requirement Common Equity Tier 1 capitalratio Tier 1 capitalratio Total capitalratio |
610,819 48,866 19.4% 21.6% 24.2% |
609,959 48,797 18.8% 21.2% 24.8% |
514,328 41,146 19.8% 22.5% 25.5% |
515,826 41,266 18.8% 21.7% 26.1% |
| Own funds in relation to own funds requirement | 3.03 | 3.10 | 3.19 | 3.26 |
| Regulatory Common Equity Tier 1 capitalrequirementincluding buffer of which capital conservation bufferrequirement of which systemic risk bufferrequirement of which countercyclical capital bufferrequirement |
10.9% 2.5% 3.0% 0.9% |
10.7% 2.5% 3.0% 0.7% |
8.2% 2.5% 1.2% |
7.9% 2.5% 0.9% |
| Common Equity Tier 1 capital available to meet buffer 1) | 14.9% | 14.3% | 15.3% | 14.3% |
| Transitionalfloor 80% of capitalrequirement according to Basel I Minimum floor own funds requirement according to Basel I Own funds according to Basel I Own funds in relation to own funds requirement Basel I |
89,774 149,030 1.66 |
86,884 151,814 1.75 |
72,415 131,977 1.82 |
69,864 134,158 1.92 |
| Leverage ratio Exposure measure forleverage ratio calculation of which on balance sheet items of which off balance sheetitems Leverage ratio |
2,519,532 2,140,093 379,439 5.2% |
2,549,149 2,120,587 428,562 5.1% |
1) CET1 ratio less minimumcapitalrequirement of 4.5 per cent excluding buffers. In addition to the CET1 requirements there is a total capitalrequirement of an additional 3.5 per cent.
Own funds
| Consolidated situation | Parent company | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | ||
| Shareholders' equity Retained earnings Accumulated other comprehensive income and otherreserves Independently reviewed profitforthe year |
21,942 60,066 45,673 16,244 |
21,942 65,190 43,226 10,618 |
21,942 52,644 30,551 16,340 |
21,942 52,443 31,485 12,477 |
|
| Total equity according to balance sheet1) | 143,925 | 140,976 | 121,476 | 118,347 | |
| Deductions related to the consolidated situation and otherforeseeable charges | –14,357 | –14,303 | –12,461 | –11,929 | |
| Common Equity Tier 1 capital before regulatory adjustments 2) |
129,568 | 126,673 | 109,016 | 106,418 | |
| Additional value adjustments Intangible assets Deferred tax assets thatrely on future profitability Fair value reserves related to gains orlosses on cash flow hedges Negative amounts resulting from the calculation of expected loss amounts |
–663 –6,225 –75 –1,192 –1,307 |
–1,169 –6,835 –208 –2,400 –381 |
–283 –4,955 –1,192 –648 |
–1,136 –5,381 –2,400 |
|
| Gains orlosses on liabilities valued atfair value resulting from changes in own credit standing Defined-benefit pension fund assets Direct and indirect holdings of own CET1 instruments Securitisation positions with 1.250% risk weight |
99 –1,807 –193 |
–115 –920 –191 –35 |
66 –193 |
–131 –191 –35 |
|
| Totalregulatory adjustments to Common Equity Tier 1 | –11,364 | –12,254 | –7,205 | –9,274 | |
| Common Equity Tier 1 capital | 118,204 | 114,419 | 101,810 | 97,144 | |
| Additional TierI instruments Grandfathered additional Tier 1 instruments |
13,922 | 9,959 4,779 |
13,922 | 9,959 4,779 |
|
| Tier 1 capital | 132,127 | 129,157 | 115,733 | 111,882 | |
| Tier 2 instruments Net provisioning amountforIRB-reported exposures Holdings of Tier 2 instruments in financial sector entities |
18,171 126 –2,575 |
24,851 58 –2,575 |
18,171 –2,575 |
24,850 227 –2,575 |
|
| Tier 2 capital | 15,722 | 22,334 | 15,596 | 22,502 | |
| TOTAL | 147,849 | 151,491 | 131,328 | 134,384 |
1) For parent bank Total equity includesUntaxed reserves net oftax.
2) The Common Equity Tier 1 capital is presented on a consolidated basis, and differs fromtotal equity according to IFRS. The insurance business contribution to equity is excluded and there is a dividend deduction calculated according to Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR).
Note 20 continued Capital adequacy
Risk exposure amount
| Consolidated situation | Parent company | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | ||||||||
| Risk | Risk | Risk | Risk | ||||||||
| Creditrisk IRB approach | exposure amount |
Own funds requirement1) | exposure amount |
Own funds requirement1) | exposure amount |
Own funds requirement1) | exposure amount |
Own funds requirement1) | |||
| Exposures to central governments or | |||||||||||
| central banks | 9,319 | 745 | 3,725 | 298 | |||||||
| Exposures to institutions | 32,838 | 2,627 | 26,254 | 2,100 | 30,757 | 2,461 | 23,868 | 1,909 | |||
| Exposures to corporates | 326,317 | 26,105 | 335,413 | 26,833 | 218,878 | 17,510 | 226,254 | 18,100 | |||
| Retail exposures | 62,296 | 4,984 | 55,617 | 4,449 | 36,962 | 2,957 | 30,660 | 2,453 | |||
| of which secured by immovable property of which retail SME |
36,558 7,033 |
2,925 563 |
34,079 4,723 |
2,726 378 |
27,738 2,807 |
2,219 225 |
25,622 | 2,050 | |||
| of which otherretail exposures | 18,704 | 1,496 | 16,815 | 1,345 | 6,417 | 513 | 5,038 | 403 | |||
| Securitisation positions | 838 | 67 | 3,066 | 246 | 368 | 29 | 2,984 | 239 | |||
| Total IRB approach | 431,607 | 34,529 | 420,350 | 33,628 | 290,691 | 23,255 | 283,766 | 22,701 | |||
| Creditrisk standardised approach | |||||||||||
| Exposures to central governments or | |||||||||||
| central banks | 4,060 | 325 | 1,801 | 144 | 333 | 27 | |||||
| Exposures to regional governments or | |||||||||||
| local authorities | 51 | 4 | |||||||||
| Exposures to public sector entities | 29 | 2 | |||||||||
| Exposures to institutions | 844 | 68 | 1,316 | 105 | 49,917 | 3,993 | 50,231 | 4,018 | |||
| Exposures to corporates | 18,197 | 1,456 | 16,422 | 1,314 | 8,039 | 643 | 7,428 | 594 | |||
| Retail exposures Exposures secured by mortgages on |
12,084 | 967 | 16,186 | 1,295 | 7,488 | 599 | 12,135 | 971 | |||
| immovable property | 2,539 | 203 | 3,803 | 304 | 846 | 68 | 2,081 | 166 | |||
| Exposures in default | 112 | 9 | 384 | 31 | 56 4 |
304 | 24 | ||||
| Exposures associated with particularly high risk | 866 | 69 | 1,477 | 118 | 866 | 69 | 1,477 | 118 | |||
| Securitisation positions | 222 | 18 | 216 | 17 | |||||||
| Exposures in the form of collective investment | |||||||||||
| undertakings (CIU) | 41 | 3 | 66 | 5 | |||||||
| Equity exposures Otheritems |
1,972 7,801 |
158 624 |
2,119 8,880 |
170 711 |
41,436 5,946 |
3,315 476 |
40,807 6,390 |
3,264 511 |
|||
| Total standardised approach | 48,739 | 3,899 | 52,750 | 4,220 | 114,594 | 9,167 | 121,186 | 9,693 | |||
| Marketrisk | |||||||||||
| Trading book exposures where internal models |
|||||||||||
| are applied | 24,892 | 1,991 | 30,042 | 2,403 | 24,876 | 1,990 | 29,994 | 2,399 | |||
| Trading book exposures applying | |||||||||||
| standardised approaches | 9,881 | 790 | 9,398 | 752 | 9,786 | 783 | 8,884 | 711 | |||
| Foreign exchange rate risk | 4,022 | 322 | 3,773 | 302 | 3,964 | 317 | 3,756 | 301 | |||
| Total marketrisk | 38,794 | 3,104 | 43,213 | 3,457 | 38,626 | 3,090 | 42,634 | 3,411 | |||
| Other own funds requirements | |||||||||||
| Operationalrisk advanced measurement | |||||||||||
| approach | 48,219 | 3,858 | 47,901 | 3,832 | 35,014 | 2,802 | 33,696 | 2,697 | |||
| Settlementrisk | 38 | 3 | 38 3 |
1 | |||||||
| Credit value adjustment | 6,767 | 541 | 7,818 | 625 | 6,095 | 488 | 6,534 | 523 | |||
| Investmentin insurance business | 16,633 | 1,331 | 16,633 | 1,331 | 16,633 | 1,331 | 16,633 | 1,331 | |||
| Other exposures Additionalrisk exposure amount2) |
4,219 15,802 |
338 1,264 |
6,547 14,747 |
524 1,180 |
12,637 | 1,011 | 11,376 | 910 | |||
| Total other own funds requirements | 91,678 | 7,334 | 93,646 | 7,492 | 70,417 | 5,635 | 68,240 | 5,461 | |||
| TOTAL | 610,819 | 48,866 | 609,959 | 48,797 | 514,328 | 41,146 | 515,826 | 41,266 |
1)Own fund requirementis 8 per cent ofrisk exposure amount according to Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR). 2) Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)Article 3.
Average risk-weight
| Consolidated situation | Parent company | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | ||
| Exposures to central governments or central banks | 3.3% | 2.1% | |||
| Exposures to institutions | 24.0% | 25.1% | 23.9% | 22.5% | |
| Exposures to corporates | 31.6% | 31.4% | 26.5% | 26.6% | |
| Retail exposures | 10.4% | 9.9% | 7.5% | 6.6% | |
| of which secured by immovable property | 7.0% | 6.9% | 5.9% | 5.7% | |
| of which qualifying revolving retail exposures | |||||
| of which retail SME | 59.6% | 73.4% | 42.5% | ||
| of which otherretail exposures | 30.7% | 28.0% | 37.2% | 29.2% | |
| Securitisation positions | 10.6% | 50.6% | 12.7% | 58.6% |
The consolidated SEB Group must also comply with capitalrequirements con cerning combined banking and insurance groups, i.e.financial conglomerates. The combined capitalrequirementforthe SEB financial conglomerate was
SEK 130.7bn while the own funds amounted to SEK 198.4bn. In these totalfig ures, SEB Life and Pension Holding AB has contributed with Solvency IIfigures from September 30, 2017.
21 Fair value measurement of assets and liabilities
| 2017 | Group | Parent company | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assets | Quoted prices in active markets |
Valuation technique using observable |
Valuation technique using non-observable |
Quoted prices in active markets |
Valuation technique using observable |
Valuation technique using non-observable |
|||||
| (Level 1) | inputs (Level 2) | inputs (Level 3) | Total | (Level 1) | inputs (Level 2) | inputs (Level 3) | Total | ||||
| Financial assets – policyholders bearing the risk Equity instruments atfair value |
275,737 | 7,053 | 630 | 283,420 | |||||||
| through profit and loss Debt securities atfair value |
51,971 | 3,493 | 1,787 | 57,251 | 47,599 | 599 | 181 | 48,379 | |||
| through profit and loss | 55,995 | 73,849 | 571 | 130,415 | 40,391 | 68,867 | 109,258 | ||||
| Derivatives – Interestrelated | 127 | 52,514 | 686 | 53,327 | 127 | 51,282 | 761 | 52,170 | |||
| Derivatives – Equity related | 251 | 3,096 | 2 | 3,349 | 251 | 3,102 | 2 | 3,355 | |||
| Derivatives – Currency related | 786 | 37,118 | 37,904 | 73 | 38,421 | 38,494 | |||||
| Derivatives – Creditrelated | 950 | 950 | 950 | 950 | |||||||
| Derivatives – Commodities related | 2,672 | 2,672 | 2,672 | 2,672 | |||||||
| Derivatives –Otherrelated | 86 | 86 | |||||||||
| Derivatives –Hedge accounting | 6,580 | 6,580 | 6,580 | 6,580 | |||||||
| Equity instruments available-for-sale | 111 | 1,080 | 627 | 1,818 | 69 | 1,049 | 474 | 1,592 | |||
| Debt securities available-for-sale | 15,631 | 10,192 | 25,823 | 6,197 | 2,605 | 8,802 | |||||
| Non-current assets and disposal groups | |||||||||||
| classified as held for sale | 89,229 | 63,657 | 29,550 | 182,436 | |||||||
| Investmentin associates1) | 251 | 592 | 843 | 250 | 592 | 842 | |||||
| TOTAL | 490,175 | 262,254 | 34,445 | 786,874 | 94,957 | 176,127 | 2,010 | 273,094 | |||
| Liabilities | |||||||||||
| Liabilities to policyholders | |||||||||||
| – investment contracts | 276,482 | 7,185 | 624 | 284,291 | |||||||
| Equity instruments atfair value | |||||||||||
| through profit and loss | 13,984 | 244 | 14,228 | 13,984 | 244 | 14,228 | |||||
| Debt securities atfair value | |||||||||||
| through profit and loss | 6,206 | 4,603 | 10,809 | 6,206 | 4,603 | 10,809 | |||||
| Derivatives – Interestrelated | 179 | 37,531 | 799 | 38,509 | 179 | 38,382 | 799 | 39,360 | |||
| Derivatives – Equity related | 80 | 1,848 | 1,928 | 80 | 1,870 | 1,950 | |||||
| Derivatives – Currency related | 565 | 40,103 | 40,668 | 71 | 41,367 | 41,438 | |||||
| Derivatives – Creditrelated | 2,598 | 2,598 | 780 | 780 | |||||||
| Derivatives – Commodities related | 780 | 780 | 2,598 | 2,598 | |||||||
| Derivatives –Otherrelated | 863 | 863 | |||||||||
| Derivatives –Hedge accounting | 86 | 86 | 863 | 863 | |||||||
| Otherfinancial liabilities | 3,842 | 3,842 | 3,842 | 3,842 | |||||||
| Debt securities atfair value through profit and loss2) |
24,388 | 24,388 | 23,356 | 23,356 | |||||||
| Liabilities of disposal groups | |||||||||||
| classified as held for sale | 21,055 | 42,536 | 8,899 | 72,490 | |||||||
| TOTAL | 318,637 | 166,277 | 10,566 | 495,480 | 20,520 | 117,661 | 1,043 | 139,224 |
| 2016 | Group | Parent company | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assets | Quoted prices in active markets (Level 1) |
Valuation technique using observable inputs (Level 2) |
Valuation technique using non-observable inputs (Level 3) |
Total | Quoted prices in active markets (Level 1) |
Valuation technique using observable inputs (Level 2) |
Valuation technique using non-observable inputs (Level 3) |
Total | |||
| Financial assets under pooled schemes | |||||||||||
| and unit-linked investment contracts Equity instruments atfair value |
275,894 | 15,589 | 4,425 | 295,908 | |||||||
| through profit and loss | 49,978 | 11,445 | 9,701 | 71,124 | 35,373 | 4,782 | 256 | 40,411 | |||
| Debt securities atfair value | |||||||||||
| through profit and loss | 86,584 | 117,276 | 1,779 | 205,639 | 25,347 | 96,665 | 122,012 | ||||
| Derivatives – Interestrelated | 1,212 | 112,133 | 6,680 | 120,025 | 1,211 | 84,128 | 832 | 86,171 | |||
| Derivatives – Equity related | 192 | 4,790 | 7 | 4,989 | 192 | 3,536 | 6 | 3,734 | |||
| Derivatives – Currency related | 1,076 | 63,980 | 65,056 | 97 | 63,047 | 63,144 | |||||
| Derivatives – Creditrelated | 918 | 918 | 918 | 918 | |||||||
| Derivatives – Commodities related | 5,805 | 5,805 | 5,805 | 5,805 | |||||||
| Derivatives –Otherrelated | 113 | 241 | 1,454 | 1,808 | |||||||
| Derivatives –Hedge accounting | 13,754 | 13,754 | |||||||||
| Equity instruments available-for-sale | 172 | 1,770 | 611 | 2,553 | 100 | 1,735 | 432 | 2,267 | |||
| Debt securities available-for-sale | 16,310 | 16,388 | 32,698 | 6,461 | 2,848 | 9,309 | |||||
| Non-current assets and disposal groups | |||||||||||
| classified as held for sale | 587 | 587 | |||||||||
| Investmentin associates 1) | 181 | 789 | 970 | 182 | 753 | 935 | |||||
| Investment properties | 7,401 | 7,401 | |||||||||
| TOTAL | 431,712 | 364,676 | 32,847 | 829,235 | 68,963 | 263,464 | 2,279 | 334,706 |
Liabilities
| Liabilities to policyholders | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| – investment contracts | 276,666 | 15,542 | 4,410 | 296,618 | ||||
| Equity instruments atfair value | ||||||||
| through profit and loss | 9,798 | 2 | 271 | 10,071 | 9,798 | 2 | 271 | 10,071 |
| Debt securities atfair value | ||||||||
| through profit and loss | 7,027 | 2,522 | 9,549 | 7,027 | 2,521 | 9,548 | ||
| Derivatives – Interestrelated | 1,375 | 93,804 | 1,774 | 96,953 | 1,375 | 60,451 | 941 | 62,767 |
| Derivatives – Equity related | 91 | 1,919 | 2,010 | 91 | 1,764 | 1,855 | ||
| Derivatives – Currency related | 1,229 | 63,192 | 64,421 | 75 | 61,339 | 61,414 | ||
| Derivatives – Creditrelated | 1,352 | 1,352 | 1,352 | 1,352 | ||||
| Derivatives – Commodities related | 6,445 | 6,445 | 6,445 | 6,445 | ||||
| Derivatives –Otherrelated | 113 | 192 | 1,862 | 2,167 | ||||
| Derivatives –Hedge accounting | 1,303 | 1,303 | ||||||
| Otherfinancial liabilities | 19,225 | 19,225 | 19,225 | 19,225 | ||||
| Debt securities atfair value | ||||||||
| through profit and loss2) | 30,992 | 30,992 | 28,940 | 28,940 | ||||
| TOTAL | 296,299 | 236,490 | 8,317 | 541,106 | 18,366 | 182,039 | 1,212 | 201,617 |
1)Venture capital activities designated atfair value through profit and loss.
2) Equity index link bonds designated atfair value through profit and loss.
Fair value measurement
The objective ofthe fair value measurementis to arrive atthe price at which an orderly transaction would take place between market participants atthe measurement date under current market conditions.
The Group has an established control environmentforthe determination offair values offinancial instruments thatincludes a review, independent from the business, of valuation models and prices. Ifthe validation principles are not adhered to,the Head of Group Finance shall be informed. Exceptions of material and principal importance require approvalfrom the GRMC (Group Risk Measurement Committee) and the ASC (Accounting Standards Commit tee).
In orderto arrive atthe fair value of a financial instrument SEB uses different methods; quoted prices in active markets, valuation techniques incorpo rating observable data and valuation techniques based on internal models. For disclosure purposes,financial instruments carried atfair value are classi fied in a fair value hierarchy according to the level of market observability of the inputs. Group Risk classifies and continuously reviews the classification offinancial instruments in the fair value hierarchy. The valuation process is the same forfinancial instruments in all levels.
An active marketis one in which transactions occur with sufficient volume and frequency to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis. The objec tive is to arrive at a price at which a transaction without modification or repackaging would occurin the principal marketforthe instrumentto which SEB has immediate access.
Fair value is generally measured forindividualfinancial instruments, in addition portfolio adjustments are made to coverthe creditrisk. To reflect counterparty risk and own creditrisk in OTC derivatives, adjustments are made based on the net exposure towards each counterpart. These adjustments are calculated on a counterparty level based on estimates of exposure at default, probability of default and recovery rates. Probability of default and recovery rate information is generally sourced from the CDS markets. For counterparties where this information is not available, or considered unreliable due to the nature ofthe exposure, alternative approaches are taken where the probability of defaultis based on generic creditindices for specific industry and/orrating. The impact from these adjustments are shown in Note 6 and Note 17f.
When valuing financial liabilities atfair value own credit standing is reflected. Fair values offinancial assets and liabilities by class can be found in Note 39.
In orderto arrive atthe fair value ofinvestment properties a market partici pant's ability to generate economic benefit by using the assetin its highest and best use are taken into account. The highest and best use takes into accountthe use ofthe assetthatis physically possible, legally permissible and financially feasible. The current use ofthe investment properties in SEB is in accordance with the highest and best use. The valuation ofinvestment properties is described in the accounting policies in note 1. The valuation of the investment properties is performed semi-annually,they are presented and approved by the board in each real estate company. The valuation princi ples used in all entities are in accordance with regulations provided by the local Financial Supervisory Authorities (FSA) which is in accordance with international valuation principles and in accordance with IFRS.
Level 1: Quoted market prices
Valuations in Level 1 are determined by reference to unadjusted quoted mar ket prices foridentical instruments in active markets where the quoted prices are readily available and the prices represent actual and regularly occurring markettransactions on an arm's length basis.
Examples of Level 1 financial instruments are listed equity securities, debt securities, and exchange-traded derivatives. Instruments traded in an active marketfor which one or more market participants provide a binding price quotation on the balance sheet date are also examples of Level 1 financial instruments.
Level 2: Valuation techniques with observable inputs
In Level 2 valuation techniques, all significantinputs to the valuation models are observable either directly orindirectly. Level 2 valuation techniques include using discounted cash flows, option pricing models,recenttransac tions and the price of anotherinstrumentthatis substantially the same.
Examples of observable inputs are foreign currency exchange rates, bind ing securities price quotations, marketinterestrates (Stibor, Libor, etc.), volatilities implied from observable option prices forthe same term and actual transactions with one or more external counterparts executed by SEB. An input can transferfrom being observable to being unobservable during the holding period due to e.g. illiquidity ofthe instrument.
Examples of Level 2 financial instruments are most OTC derivatives such as options and interestrate swaps based on the Libor swap rate or a foreign denominated yield curve. Other examples are instruments for which SEB recently entered into transactions with third parties and instruments for which SEB interpolates between observable variables.
Level 3: Valuation techniques with significant unobservable inputs
Level 3 valuation techniques incorporate significantinputs that are unobservable. These techniques are generally based on extrapolating from observable inputs for similarinstruments, analysing historical data or other analytical techniques. Examples of Level 3 financial instruments are more complex OTC derivatives, long dated options for which the volatility is extrapolated or derivatives that depend on an unobservable correlation. Other examples are instruments for which there is currently no active market or binding quotes, such as unlisted equity instruments and private equity holdings.
Ifthe fair value offinancial instruments includes more than one unobservable input,the unobservable inputs are aggregated in orderto determine the classification ofthe entire instrument. The level in the fair value hierarchy within which a financial instrumentis classified is determined on the basis ofthe lowestlevel ofinputthatis significantto the fair value in its entirety.
Significant transfers and reclassifications between levels
Transfers between levels may occur when there are indications that market conditions have changed, e.g. a change in liquidity. The Valuation/Pricing committee of each relevant division decides on material shifts between levels. As a result of the decision to divest SEB Pension a re-classifications in the balance sheet have been performed. All assets and liabilities belonging to SEB Pension have been re-classified to Assets- and liabilities held for sale in accordance with IFRS 5. The re-classifications was executed at the end of the fourth quarter 2017.
Changes in level 3
| Group, 2017 | Gain/loss | Gain/loss in Other com- |
Transfers | Transfers | Exchange | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assets | Opening balance | in Income statement 1) 2) |
prehensive income3) |
Pur- chases | Sales | Settle ments |
into Level 3 |
out of Level 3 |
Reclassi fication |
rate diffe- rences |
Total |
| Financial assets – policyholders | |||||||||||
| bearing the risk | 4,425 | –65 | 3 | –1 | –40 | –3,735 | 43 | 630 | |||
| Equity instruments atfair value | |||||||||||
| through profit and loss | 9,701 | 140 | 1,055 | –290 | –229 | –8,655 | 65 | 1,787 | |||
| Debt securities atfair value through | |||||||||||
| profit and loss | 1,779 | 29 | 184 | –20 | –227 | –1,181 | 7 | 571 | |||
| Derivatives – Interestrelated | 6,680 | –141 | 47 | –5,948 | 48 | 686 | |||||
| Derivatives – Equity related | 7 | –5 | –1 | 1 | 2 | ||||||
| Derivatives –Otherrelated | 1,454 | –1,464 | 10 | ||||||||
| Equity instruments available-for-sale | 611 | 100 | –9 | 83 | –219 | 61 | 627 | ||||
| Investmentin associates | 789 | 129 | 74 | –402 | 2 | 592 | |||||
| Investment properties | 7,401 | –7,454 | 53 | ||||||||
| TOTAL | 32,847 | 187 | –9 | 1,399 | –932 | 47 | 61 | –496 –28,438 | 229 | 4,895 | |
| Liabilities |
| Liabilities to policyholders – investment contracts |
4,410 | –66 | –40 | –3,724 | 44 | 624 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity instruments atfair value | |||||||||
| through profit and loss | 271 | –18 | –14 | 3 | 2 | 244 | |||
| Derivatives – Interestrelated | 1,774 | –1,003 | –12 | 28 | 12 | 799 | |||
| Derivatives –Otherrelated | 1,862 | –1,875 | 13 | ||||||
| TOTAL | 8,317 | –1,087 | –26 | 3 | 28 | –40 | –5,599 | 71 | 1,667 |
| Group, 2016 | Gain/loss in Income |
Gain/loss in Other com- prehensive |
Settle | Transfers into |
Transfers out of |
Reclassi | Exchange rate diffe |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assets | Opening balance | statement 1) 2) |
income | Pur- chases | Sales | ments | Level 3 | Level 3 3) |
fication | rences | Total |
| Financial assets – policyholders | |||||||||||
| bearing the risk | 2,607 | –51 | 3,868 | –2,128 | 129 | 4,425 | |||||
| Equity instruments atfair value | |||||||||||
| through profit and loss | 10,286 | 224 | 1,631 | –2,799 | –46 | 405 | 9,701 | ||||
| Debt securities atfair value | |||||||||||
| through profit and loss | 1,204 | –130 | 871 | –199 | –8 | 41 | 1,779 | ||||
| Derivatives – Interestrelated | 10,383 | –4,292 | 231 | –36 | 14 | 380 | 6,680 | ||||
| Derivatives – Equity related | 90 | –9 | 1 | –74 | –1 | 7 | |||||
| Derivatives –Otherrelated | 756 | 732 | –73 | 39 | 1,454 | ||||||
| Equity instruments available-for-sale | 648 | –190 | 318 | 81 | –217 | –52 | 23 | 611 | |||
| Investmentin associates | 743 | 120 | 123 | –188 | –9 | 789 | |||||
| Investment properties | 7,169 | 204 | 3 | –287 | 312 | 7,401 | |||||
| TOTAL | 33,886 | –3,392 | 318 | 6,809 | –5,927 | 14 | –180 | 1,319 | 32,847 |
Liabilities
| Liabilities to policyholders – investment contracts |
2,602 | –51 | 3,854 | –2,124 | 129 | 4,410 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity instruments atfair value | ||||||||
| through profit and loss | 445 | 90 | –267 | 3 | 271 | |||
| Derivatives – Interestrelated | 10,159 | –3,388 | 41 | 41 | –5,299 | 220 | 1,774 | |
| Derivatives –Otherrelated | 1,242 | 541 | 84 | –65 | 60 | 1,862 | ||
| TOTAL | 14,448 | –2,808 | 3,712 | –2,189 | 41 | –5,299 | 412 | 8,317 |
1) Fair value gains and losses recognised in the income statement are included in Netfinancial income and Net otherincome.
2)Gains/losses recognised in the income statementrelating to instruments held as of 31December are SEK 1,154m(–321).
3) Fair value gains and losses recognised in other comprehensive income are included as available for sale.
Changes in level 3
| Parent company, 2017 Assets |
Opening balance | Gain/loss in Income statement 1) 2) |
Gain/loss in Other com- prehensive income |
Pur- chases | Sales | Settle ments |
Transfers into Level 3 |
Transfers out of Level 3 |
Reclassi fication |
Exchange rate diffe- rences |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity instruments atfair value | |||||||||||
| through profit and loss | 256 | –8 | –72 | 5 | 181 | ||||||
| Derivatives – Interestrelated | 832 | –140 | 63 | 6 | 761 | ||||||
| Derivatives – Equity related | 6 | –5 | 1 | 2 | |||||||
| Equity instruments available-for-sale | 432 | 161 | 22 | 82 | –218 | –5 | 474 | ||||
| Investmentin associates | 753 | 142 | 75 | –380 | 2 | 592 | |||||
| TOTAL | 2,279 | 150 | 22 | 157 | –670 | 63 | 9 | 2,010 | |||
| Liabilities | |||||||||||
| Equity instruments atfair value | |||||||||||
| through profit and loss | 271 | –18 | –14 | 3 | 2 | 244 | |||||
| Derivatives – Interestrelated | 941 | –163 | –12 | 28 | 5 | 799 | |||||
| TOTAL | 1,212 | –181 | –26 | 3 | 28 | 7 | 1,043 |
| Parent company, 2016 | Opening balance | Gain/loss in Income |
Gain/loss in Other com- prehensive |
Pur- chases | Settle | Transfers into |
Transfers out of |
Reclassi | Exchange rate diffe- |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assets | statement 1) 2) |
income | Sales | ments | Level 3 | Level 3 | fication | rences | Total | ||
| Equity instruments atfair value | |||||||||||
| through profit and loss | 298 | 96 | –148 | 10 | 256 | ||||||
| Derivatives – Interestrelated | 903 | –72 | –23 | 15 | 9 | 832 | |||||
| Derivatives – Equity related | 15 | –9 | 6 | ||||||||
| Equity instruments available-for-sale | 507 | –1 | 3 | 29 | –71 | –52 | 17 | 432 | |||
| Investmentin associates | 712 | 114 | 122 | –185 | –10 | 753 | |||||
| TOTAL | 2,435 | 128 | 3 | 151 | –427 | 15 | –52 | 26 | 2,279 | ||
| Liabilities | |||||||||||
| Equity instruments atfair value through profit and loss Derivatives – Interestrelated |
445 813 |
90 87 |
–267 –8 |
41 | 3 8 |
271 941 |
|||||
| TOTAL | 1,258 | 177 | –275 | 41 | 11 | 1,212 | |||||
1) Fair value gains and losses recognised in the income statement are included in Netfinancial income and Net otherincome.
2)Gains/losses recognised in the income statementrelating to instruments held as of 31December are SEK 139m(–322).
Sensitivity of Level 3 financial instruments to unobservable inputs
The table below illustrates the potential profit orloss impact ofthe relative uncertainty in the fair value of assets and liabilities thatfortheir valuation are dependent on unobservable inputs. The sensitivity to unobservable inputs is assessed by altering the assumptions to the valuation techniques, illustrated below by changes in index-linked swap spreads, implied volatilities, credit
spreads or comparator multiples. Itis unlikely that all unobservable inputs would be simultaneously atthe extremes oftheirranges ofreasonably possi ble alternatives. There have been no significant changes during 2017. The largest open marketrisk within Level 3 financial instruments is found within the insurance business.
| 2017 | 2016 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | Assets | Liabilities | Net | Sensitivity | Assets | Liabilities | Net | Sensitivity | ||
| Derivative instrumentsAFV1) 2) 4) | 688 | –798 | –110 | 38 | 780 | –940 | –160 | 49 | ||
| Equity instrumentsAFV 3) | 180 | –244 | –64 | 256 | –271 | –15 | ||||
| Equity instrumentsAFS 3) 6) | 336 | 336 | 63 | 432 | 432 | 78 | ||||
| Investments in associates 3) | 729 | 729 | 146 | 753 | 753 | 151 | ||||
| Insurance holdings – Financial instruments 5) 7) | 2,380 | 2,380 | 331 | 18,477 | –2,695 | 15,782 | 1,807 | |||
| Non-current assets and disposal groups | ||||||||||
| classified as held for sale 4 ) 5) 6 ) 7) | 16,070 | –2,395 | 13,675 | 1,657 | 18,477 | –2,695 | 15,782 | 1,807 | ||
| Insurance holdings – Investment properties 6) 7) | 7,401 | 7,401 | 740 |
1) Sensitivity froma shift ofinflation linked swap spreads by 16 basis points (16) and implied volatilities by 5 percentage points (5).
2) Sensitivity froma shift of swap spreads by 5 basis points (5).
3)Valuation is estimated in a range ofreasonable outcomes. Sensitivity analysis is based on 20 per cent (20) shiftin market values.
4) Shiftin implied volatility down by 10 percentage points (10).
5) Sensitivity analysis is based on a shiftin private equity of 20 per cent (20), structured credits 10 per cent (10) and derivative market values of 10 per cent (10).
6) Sensitivity from a shift ofinvestment properties/real estate funds market values of 10 per cent (10).
7) The sensitivity shows changes in the value ofthe insurance holdings which do not at alltimes affectthe P/L oftheGroup since any surplus in the traditional life portfolios are consumed first.
22 Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
| Group | Parent company | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | |
| Securities held fortrading Derivatives held fortrading |
157,885 98,281 |
162,516 198,271 |
157,628 97,640 |
162,335 147,124 |
| Held fortrading | 256,165 | 360,787 | 255,268 | 309,459 |
| Financial assets – policyholders bearing the risk Financial assets underinsurance contracts Otherfinancial assets atfair value |
283,420 21,797 7,985 |
295,908 107,667 6,580 |
9 | 87 |
| Designated atfair value through profit orloss | 313,203 | 410,155 | 9 | 87 |
| Derivatives held for hedging | 6,587 | 14,084 | 6,580 | 12,649 |
| TOTAL | 575,955 | 785,026 | 261,857 | 322,195 |
The category Financial assets atfair value through profit and loss comprises financial instruments either classified as held fortrading orfinancial assets designated to this category upon initialrecognition. These financial assets are recognised atfair value and the value change is recognised through profit and loss.
Securities held fortrading
| Equity instruments | 48,371 | 40,324 | 48,370 | 40,323 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eligible debt securities1) | 46,274 | 33,991 | 46,045 | 33,811 |
| Other debt securities1) | 62,820 | 87,653 | 62,793 | 87,653 |
| Accrued interest | 420 | 548 | 419 | 548 |
| TOTAL | 157,885 | 162,516 | 157,628 | 162,335 |
1) See note 41 forissuers.
Derivatives held fortrading
| Other derivatives | 3,708 | 8,531 | 3,621 | 6,723 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOTAL | 98,281 | 198,271 | 97,640 | 147,124 |
| Currency-related derivatives | 37,904 | 65,056 | 38,494 | 63,144 |
| Equity-related derivatives | 3,349 | 4,990 | 3,355 | 3,734 |
| Interest-related derivatives | 53,320 | 119,694 | 52,170 | 73,523 |
Insurance assets atfair value
| Equity instruments | 8,871 | 30,712 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eligible debt securities1) | 8,485 | 43,805 | |
| Other debt securities1) | 4,379 | 32,587 | |
| Accrued interest | 61 | 563 | |
| TOTAL | 21,797 | 107,667 |
1) See note 41 forissuers.
Otherfinancial assets atfair value
| Equity instruments | 9 | 88 | 9 | 87 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eligible debt securities1) | 7,135 | 6,169 | ||
| Other debt securities1) | 813 | 301 | ||
| Accrued interest | 29 | 22 | ||
| TOTAL | 7,985 | 6,580 | 9 | 87 |
1) See note 41 forissuers.
Derivatives held for hedging
| Fair value hedges | 5,294 | 8,777 | 5,287 | 8,763 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash flow hedges | 1,273 | 3,884 | 1,273 | 3,884 |
| Portfolio hedges forinterestrate risk | 21 | 1,423 | 21 | 2 |
| TOTAL | 6,587 | 14,084 | 6,580 | 12,649 |
To eliminate to the extent possible inconsistency in measurement and accounting the Group has chosen to designate financial assets and financial liabilities, which the unitlinked insurance business give rise to, atfair value through profit orloss. This implies that changes in fair value on those investment assets (preferably funds), where the policy-holders bearthe risk and the corresponding liabilities, are recognised in profit orloss. Fair value on those assets and liabilities are set by quoted market price in an active market.
23 Available-for-sale financial assets
| Group | Parent company | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | ||
| Equity instruments at cost | 134 | 496 | 126 | 487 | |
| Equity instruments atfair value | 1,777 | 2,507 | 1,581 | 2,256 | |
| Eligible debt securities1) | 25,386 | 31,426 | 6,087 | 6,588 | |
| Other debt securities1) | 270 | 1,021 | 2,604 | 2,608 | |
| Seized shares | 42 | 46 | 11 | 11 | |
| Accrued interest | 167 | 251 | 111 | 113 | |
| TOTAL | 27,776 | 35,747 | 10,521 | 12,063 |
1) See note 41 forissuers.
Equity instruments measured at cost do not have a quoted market price in an active market. Further, it has not been possible to reliably measure the fair values of those equity instruments. Most of these investments are held for
strategic reasons and are not intended to be sold in the near future.
24 Investments in associates
| Group | Parent company | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | ||
| Strategic investments Venture capital holdings |
334 842 |
229 970 |
190 842 |
90 935 |
|
| TOTAL | 1,176 | 1,199 | 1,032 | 1,025 |
| Strategic investments | Assets1) | Liabilities 1) |
Revenues 1) |
Profit orloss1) | Book value | Ownership, % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BankomatAB, Stockholm | 5,337 | 4,987 | 789 | 20 | 66 | 20 |
| BankomatcentralenAB, Stockholm | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28 |
| BGCHoldingAB, Stockholm | 473 | 148 | 793 | 9 | 103 | 33 |
| GetswishAB, Stockholm | 88 | 43 | 32 | –20 | 19 | 20 |
| UCAB, Stockholm | 277 | 140 | 677 | 57 | 1 | 28 |
| Parent company holdings | 190 | |||||
| Holdings of subsidiaries | 16 | |||||
| Group adjustments | 129 | |||||
| GROUPHOLDINGS | 334 |
1) Retrieved fromrespectiveAnnualreport 2016.
| 2017 | 2016 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Venture capital holdings | Ownership, % | Book value | Ownership, % | ||
| Actiwave, Linköping | 0 | 42 | 4 | 42 | |
| AirsonettAB,Ängelholm | 100 | 33 | 95 | 34 | |
| ApicaAB, Stockholm | 60 | 25 | 41 | 20 | |
| Avaj InternationalHoldingAB, Stockholm | 149 | 18 | 60 | 18 | |
| AvidicareHoldingAB,Ängelholm | 17 | 38 | 17 | 38 | |
| CapresA/S, Copenhagen | 39 | 45 | 15 | 40 | |
| CoinifyApS,Herlev | 15 | 16 | 7 | 9 | |
| Donya LabsAB, Linköping | 0 | 0 | 118 | 22 | |
| Fält CommunicationsAB,Umeå | 0 | 0 | 64 | 46 | |
| InDex PharmaceuticalsHoldingAB, Stockholm | 67 | 23 | 90 | 23 | |
| LeasifyAB, Stockholm | 10 | 17 | 10 | 17 | |
| NomadHoldings Ltd, Newcastle | 0 | 0 | 45 | 22 | |
| Now Interact NordicAB, Stockholm | 15 | 10 | 15 | 10 | |
| NuEvolutionAB, Stockholm | 167 | 24 | 146 | 24 | |
| OssDsignAB,Uppsala | 25 | 22 | 25 | 20 | |
| ProdacapoAB,Örnsköldsvik | 0 | 0 | 4 | 22 | |
| Scandinova SystemsAB,Uppsala | 63 | 30 | 48 | 29 | |
| ScibaseHoldingAB, Stockholm | 16 | 13 | 36 | 23 | |
| SenionAB, Linköping | 19 | 34 | 15 | 27 | |
| TSSHoldingAB, Stockholm | 80 | 43 | 80 | 43 | |
| Parent company holdings | 842 | 935 | |||
| Holdings of subsidiaries | 35 | ||||
| GROUPHOLDINGS | 842 | 970 |
Information aboutthe corporate registration numbers and numbers of shares ofthe associates is available upon request.
Strategic investments in associates in the Group are accounted for using the equity method.
Investments in associates held by the venture capital organisation of the Group have, in accordance with IAS 28, been designated as atfair value through profit and loss. Therefore,these holdings are accounted forin accordance with IAS 39.
Some entities, in which the bank has an ownership ofless than 20 per cent, has been classified as investments in associates. The reason is thatthe bank is represented in the board of directors and participates in the policy making processes ofthose entities.
Allfinancial assets within the Group's venture capital business are managed and its performance is evaluated on a fair value basis in accordance with documented risk management and investment strategies.
Fair values forinvestments listed in an active market are based on quoted market prices. Ifthe marketfor a financial instrumentis not active,fair value is established by using valuation techniques based on discounted cash flow analysis, valuation with reference to financial instruments thatis substan tially the same, and valuation with reference to observable markettransac tions in the same financial instrument.
25 Shares in subsidiaries
| Group | Parent company | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | ||
| Swedish subsidiaries Foreign subsidiaries 1) |
137 | 39 | 14,228 36,339 |
14,128 36,483 |
|
| TOTAL of which holdings in creditinstitutions |
137 | 39 | 50,567 33,264 |
50,611 33,384 |
| 2017 | 2016 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Swedish subsidiaries | Country | Book value Dividend Ownership, % | Book value Dividend Ownership, % | |||||
| Aktiv PlaceringAB, Stockholm | Sweden | 38 | 100 | 38 | 100 | |||
| Enskilda Kapitalförvaltning SEBAB, Stockholm | Sweden | 0 | 100 | 0 | 100 | |||
| Försäkringsaktiebolaget Skandinaviska Enskilda Captive, | ||||||||
| Stockholm | Sweden | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||
| Parkeringshuset LasarettetHGB KB, Stockholm | Sweden | 0 | 99 | 0 | 99 | |||
| ReponoHoldingAB, Stockholm | Sweden | 3,227 | 100 | 3,227 | 100 | |||
| SEB FörvaltningsAB, Stockholm | Sweden | 5 | 100 | 5 | 100 | |||
| SEB Internal SupplierAB, Stockholm | Sweden | 12 | 100 | 12 | 100 | |||
| SEB Investment ManagementAB, Stockholm | Sweden | 523 | 430 | 100 | 523 | 100 | ||
| SEB Kort BankAB, Stockholm | Sweden | 2,360 | 1,096 | 100 | 2,260 | 769 | 100 | |
| SEB Life and PensionHoldingAB, Stockholm | Sweden | 6,424 | 2,500 | 100 | 6,424 | 2,800 | 100 | |
| SEB PortföljförvaltningAB, Stockholm | Sweden | 1,115 | 100 | 1,115 | 100 | |||
| SEB Strategic InvestmentsAB, Stockholm | Sweden | 424 | 100 | 424 | 100 | |||
| Skandinaviska Kreditaktiebolaget, Stockholm | Sweden | 0 | 100 | 0 | 100 | |||
| TOTAL | 14,228 | 4,026 | 14,128 | 3,569 |
| Foreign subsidiaries | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baltectus B.V.,Amsterdam | Netherlands | 167 | 100 | 252 | 100 | ||
| Domena Property Sp. Z o.o., Warsaw | Poland | 130 | 100 | 120 | 100 | ||
| Möller BilfinansAS,Oslo | Norway | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | |
| Postep Property Sp. Z o.o., Warsaw | Poland | 55 | 100 | 51 | 100 | ||
| SEBAG, Frankfurt am Main | Germany | 18,521 | 100 | 19,313 | 832 | 100 | |
| SEBAsset Management S.A., Luxembourg | Luxembourg | 0 | 0 | 0 | 74 | 0 | |
| SEB Bank JSC, St Petersburg | Russia | 458 | 100 | 458 | 100 | ||
| SEB Banka,AS, Riga | Latvia | 1,682 | 701 | 100 | 1,586 | 604 | 100 |
| SEB bankas,AB,Vilnius | Lithuania | 6,423 | 1,175 | 100 | 6,239 | 819 | 100 |
| SEB Corporate Bank, PJSC, Kiev | Ukraine | 138 | 100 | 138 | 100 | ||
| SEB do Brasil Representacões LTDA, Sao Paulo | Brazil | 0 | 100 | 0 | 100 | ||
| SEB Fondbolag FinlandAb,Helsinki | Finland | 19 | 100 | 18 | 100 | ||
| SEB Fund Services S.A., Luxembourg | Luxembourg | 100 | 100 | 97 | 100 | ||
| SEBHong Kong Trade Services Ltd,Hong Kong | China | 0 | 100 | 0 | 100 | ||
| SEB Kapitalförvaltning FinlandAb,Helsinki | Finland | 255 | 100 | 248 | 100 | ||
| SEB LeasingOy,Helsinki | Finland | 4,273 | 82 | 100 | 4,124 | 177 | 100 |
| SEB NjordAS,Oslo | Norway | 0 | 100 | 0 | 100 | ||
| SEB Pank,AS, Tallinn | Estonia | 2,260 | 286 | 100 | 2,014 | 186 | 100 |
| SEB Securities Inc, New York | USA | 40 | 100 | 48 | 100 | ||
| Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken S.A., Luxembourg | Luxembourg | 1,422 | 145 | 100 | 1,376 | 195 | 100 |
| Skandinaviska Enskilda Ltd, London | Great Britain | 395 | 100 | 401 | 100 | ||
| TOTAL | 36,339 | 2,389 | 36,483 | 2,891 |
Information aboutthe corporate registration numbers and numbers of shares ofthe subsidiaries is available upon request.
1) Some dormant subsidiaries in theGroup are consolidated using the equity method.
Significant restrictions on the ability to use assets and settle liabilities of the Group
Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (Publ) can obtain distributions of capital, use assets and settle liabilities of members ofthe Group within the limitation of some regulatory, statutory and contractualrestrictions. These restrictions are:
Regulatory requirements
Regulated subsidiaries are subjectto prudentialregulatory capitalrequire ments in the countries in which they are regulated. These subsidiaries are required to maintain a certain level of own funds in relation to their exposures, restricting their ability to distribute cash or other assets to the parent company. To meetthese requirements the subsidiaries hold capital instruments and other forms of subordinated liabilities.
Statutory requirements
Subsidiaries are required to have a certain level of solvency and are restricted to make distributions of capital and profits leading to a solvency below that level.
Contractual requirements
The Group pledges some ofits financial assets as collateralforfinancing and liquidity purposes. Encumbered assets can't be transferred within the Group. Such assets are described furtherin the note Pledged assets, contingentlia bilities and commitments.
26 Interest in unconsolidated structured entities
| Group | Parent company | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assets , 2017 | Special purpose entities |
Asset management1) |
Total | Special purpose entities |
Asset management1) |
Total |
| Loans to the public | 8,434 | 343 | 8,777 | 7,244 | 343 | 7,587 |
| Financial assets atfair value through profit and loss | 2 | 276,559 | 276,561 | 7 2 |
6 | 7 7 |
| of which: derivatives | 2 | 5 | 2 | 5 | ||
| Available-for-sale financial assets | 1,047 | 1,047 | 1,006 | 1,006 | ||
| TOTAL | 8,435 | 277,949 | 286,384 | 7,246 | 1,355 | 8,600 |
| Liabilities | ||||||
| Deposits and borrowings from the public | 216 | 77 | 292 | –87 | –77 | –164 |
| Financial liabilities atfair value through profit orloss | 1 | 52 | 53 53 |
–1 | –52 | 53 –53 – |
| of which: derivatives | 1 | 52 | –1 | –52 | ||
| TOTAL | 217 | 129 | 346 | –88 | –129 | –217 |
| Obligations | 577 | 577 | 577 | 577 | ||
| TheGroup's maximum exposure to loss | 9,012 | 20,638 | 29,650 | 7,823 | 1,355 | 9,177 |
| 1) Investments in SEB- and non-SEBmanaged funds | ||||||
| Assets, 2016 | ||||||
| Loans to the public | 8,939 | 12 | 8,951 | 7,440 | 12 | 7,452 |
| Financial assets atfair value through profit and loss | 1,950 | 263,815 | 2 034 265,765 |
1,950 | 94 | 2 034 2,044 |
| of which: securities held fortrading | 1,946 | 88 | 11 , |
1,946 | 88 | 11 , |
| of which: derivatives | 4 | 7 | 4 | 7 | ||
| Available-for-sale financial assets | 127 | 1,292 | 1,419 | 127 | 1,226 | 1,353 |
| TOTAL | 11,016 | 265,119 | 276,135 | 9,517 | 1,333 | 10,850 |
| Liabilities | ||||||
| Deposits and borrowings from the public | 218 | 887 | 1,105 | 93 | 887 | 980 |
| Financial liabilities atfair value through profit orloss | 1 | 63 | 64 64 |
1 | 63 | 64 64 |
| of which: derivatives | 1 | 63 | 1 | 63 | ||
| TOTAL | 219 | 950 | 1,169 | 94 | 950 | 1,044 |
| Obligations | 312 | 312 | 193 | 193 | ||
| TheGroup's maximum exposure to loss | 11,328 | 24,113 | 35,441 | 9,710 | 1,333 | 11,043 |
1) Investments in SEB- and non-SEBmanaged funds
Interests in unconsolidated structured entities refers to cases when the Group has interests in structured entities which it does not control. A struc tured entity is an entity thatis designed so that voting or similarrights are notthe dominantfactorin deciding who controls the entity, such as when any voting rights relate to administrative tasks only and the relevant activities are directed by means of contractual arrangements.
The Group enters into transactions with structured entities in the normal cause of business for various reasons. Depending on the type of structured entity the purpose is to support customertransactions,to engage in specific investment opportunities and to facilitate the start-up of certain entities.
The Group has interests in the following types of structured entities:
Interests in funds
The Group establishes and manages funds to provide customers with investment opportunities, SEB is considered to be the sponsor ofthose funds. Total assets under managementrepresentthe size of a fund. Total assets under management offunds managed by SEB are SEK 569bn (531). The total assets of Non-SEB managed funds are not publically available and not considered meaningfulfor understanding related risks, and have therefore not been pre sented. In some cases the Group facilitates the start-up offunds by holding units and it may hold units in funds managed by the Group or by a third party forinvestment purposes within the life business. The funds managed by the Group generate income in the form of managementfees and performance fees based on the assets under management. The income from asset managementis presented in note 5. The maximum exposure to loss is limited to the carrying amount of units held by the Group. This amount does notreflect the probable loss.
Interests in other structured entities
The Group has had a role in establishing structured entities to support cus tomertransactions. The purpose ofthese entities is to provide alternative funding and liquidity improvementto the sellers and investment opportunities to investors by purchasing assets and obtain funding forthe purchases with the assets as collateral. The Group provides seniorrevolving creditfacilities and administrative services to the entities and earn fee and interest income on market based conditions.
The Group holds the most seniorinvestments in debtinstruments issued by banks,through securitisation vehicles (SPV) whose purpose is to provide alternative funding to the issuers and investment opportunities to investors. The SPVs purchase pools of assetfrom the originating banks balance sheet, e.g. credit card loans,residential mortgage loans, loans to small and medium sized enterprises and fund these purchases by issuing debt securities with the assets as collateral. The securities have multiple tranches of subordina tion.
The maximum exposure to loss regarding investments in other structured entities is limited to the carrying amount ofthe investments and may occur only afterlosses by creditors with junior exposures. The maximum exposure to loss does notreflectthe probability ofloss and hedging or collateral arrangements are not considered. The total assets forthese entities are not considered meaningful information forthe purpose of understanding the related risks and therefore have not been presented.
27 Related parties
| Group | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Associated companies | Key management | Otherrelated parties | ||||||
| 2017 | Assets/ Liabilities |
Interest | Assets/ Liabilities |
Interest | Assets/ Liabilities |
Interest | ||
| Loans to the public Notional amount of derivatives |
960 | 13 | 227 | 3 | 30 1,575 |
|||
| Deposits and borrowings from the public | 105 | 38 | 260 |
2016
| Loans to the public | 101 | 13 | 219 | 3 | 62 | 1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Notional amount of derivatives | 12 | 911 | ||||
| Deposits and borrowings from the public | 226 | 131 | 1,251 | |||
| Obligations | 1 |
| Parent company | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Associated companies | Group companies | ||||
| 2017 | Assets/ Liabilities |
Interest | Assets/ Liabilities |
Interest | |
| Loans to creditinstitutions Loans to the public Interest-bearing securities Positive replacement values of derivatives Other assets |
875 | 9 | 138,931 11,887 2,605 3,862 24,092 |
126 68 53 |
|
| TOTAL | 875 | 9 | 181,377 | 247 | |
| Deposits from creditinstitutions Deposits and borrowings from the public Negative replacement values of derivatives Otherliabilities |
4 | 46,490 10,359 6,228 240 |
–415 –52 |
||
| TOTAL | 4 | 63,317 | -467 | ||
| 2016 | |||||
| Loans to creditinstitutions Loans to the public Interest-bearing securities Positive replacement values of derivatives Other assets |
1 | 7 | 173,291 15,281 2,616 10,984 16,853 |
412 62 53 |
|
| TOTAL | 1 | 7 | 219,025 | 527 | |
| Deposits from creditinstitutions Deposits and borrowings from the public Issued securities Negative replacement values of derivatives Otherliabilities |
4 | 66,849 11,040 21 12,393 165 |
–433 –18 |
||
| TOTAL | 4 | 90,468 | –451 |
Key management above refers to the Board of Directors and the Group Execu tive Committee. Entities with significantinfluence or significantly influenced by key managementin the Group, and post-employment benefit plans are presented as otherrelated parties. Investor AB and the pension foundation SEB-stiftelsen are within this category as well as close family members to key management. In addition the Group has insurance administration and asset management agreements with Gamla Livförsäkringsbolaget SEB Trygg Liv
based on conditions on the market. SEB has received SEK 120m (129) under the insurance administration agreement and SEK 381m (361) underthe asset management agreement. For more information on Gamla Livförsäkringsbolaget SEB Trygg Liv, see note 46.
The parent company is a related party to its subsidiaries and associates. See note 24 Investments in associates and note 25 Shares in subsidiaries for disclosures ofinvestments.
28 Tangible and intangible assets
| Group | Parent company | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | |
| Goodwill | 4,727 | 4,760 | ||
| Deferred acquisition costs | 3,968 | 4,044 | ||
| Internally developed IT-systems | 1,611 | 1,925 | 1,403 | 1,755 |
| Otherintangible assets | 413 | 676 | 195 | 268 |
| Intangible assets 1) | 10,718 | 11,405 | 1,597 | 2,023 |
| Equipment | 1,111 | 853 | 842 | 492 |
| Equipmentleased to clients 2) | 33,643 | 34,669 | ||
| Properties for own operations | 19 | 55 | 2 | 2 |
| Property and equipment | 1,130 | 908 | 34,487 | 35,163 |
| Investment properties recognised at cost | 20 | 31 | ||
| Investment properties recognised atfair value | 7,401 | |||
| Properties taken overfor protection of claims | 183 | 413 | ||
| Investment properties | 203 | 7,845 | ||
| TOTAL | 12,052 | 20,158 | 36,084 | 37,186 |
1)Goodwill has an indefinite useful life.All otherintangible assets have a definite useful life.Amortisation methods are described in note 1.
2) Equipmentleased to clients are recognised as financial leases and presented as loans in theGroup. See note 44.
Intangible assets
| Group | Parent company | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Goodwill | Deferred acquisition costs |
Internally developed IT-systems |
Other intangible assets |
Total | Goodwill | Internally developed IT-systems |
Other intangible assets |
Total |
| Opening balance Additions from acquisitions and capitalisations Reclassifications |
4,760 | 12,695 882 |
3,911 908 3 |
3,845 215 –549 |
25,211 2,004 –546 |
1,377 | 3,668 804 |
749 205 |
5,794 1,009 |
| Retirements and disposals1) Exchange rate differences |
–33 | 50 | –202 4 |
–87 52 |
–290 72 |
–151 –2 |
–71 –1 |
–222 –3 |
|
| Acquisition value | 4,727 | 13,627 | 4,623 | 3,475 | 26,451 | 1,377 | 4,320 | 882 | 6,579 |
| Opening balance Current year's amortisations Current year's impairments1) Reclassifications |
–8,651 –957 |
–1,986 –438 –661 |
–3,169 –169 –312 547 |
–13,806 –1,564 –973 547 |
–1,377 | –1,913 –408 –661 |
–481 –52 –210 |
–3,771 –460 –872 |
|
| Retirements and disposals1) Exchange rate differences |
–51 | 75 –2 |
77 –37 |
153 –90 |
65 | 55 1 |
120 1 |
||
| Accumulated depreciations | –9,659 | –3,012 | –3,062 | –15,733 | –1,377 | –2,917 | –687 | –4,982 | |
| TOTAL | 4,727 | 3,968 | 1,611 | 413 | 10,718 | 1,403 | 195 | 1,597 |
2016
| Opening balance Additions from acquisitions and capitalisations Reclassifications |
10,003 | 12,163 859 –394 |
3,700 567 |
3,839 86 –5 |
29,705 1,512 –399 |
1,444 | 3,478 507 |
820 55 |
5,742 562 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Retirements and disposals1) Exchange rate differences |
–5,334 91 |
–6 73 |
–363 7 |
–170 95 |
–5,873 266 |
–67 | –320 3 |
–127 1 |
–514 4 |
| Acquisition value | 4,760 | 12,695 | 3,911 | 3,845 | 25,211 | 1,377 | 3,668 | 749 | 5,794 |
| Opening balance Current year's amortisations Current year's impairments Reclassifications |
–7,914 –943 234 |
–1,705 –354 2 |
–3,017 –135 –3 |
–12,636 –1,432 233 |
–1,201 –43 –200 |
–1,644 –340 |
–473 –27 |
–3,318 –410 –200 |
|
| Retirements and disposals1) Exchange rate differences |
6 –34 |
70 1 |
65 –79 |
141 –112 |
67 | 71 | 20 –1 |
158 –1 |
|
| Accumulated depreciations | –8,651 | –1,986 | –3,169 | –13,806 | –1,377 | –1,913 | –481 | –3,771 | |
| TOTAL | 4,760 | 4,044 | 1,925 | 676 | 11,405 | 1,755 | 268 | 2,023 |
1) Including Items affecting comparability, see note 49.
Note 28 continued Tangible and intangible assets
Principle for allocation of goodwill
In conjunction with SEB's reorganisation as of 1 January 2016 goodwill was reallocated to appropriate Cash Generating Units (CGUs). The CGU structure is aligned with the business unit (BU) combined with geography to reflectthe importance of steering and measuring the new customer-oriented organisa tion. The CGU structure before the reorganisation was to a large extent aligned with operating segments, exceptfor Card and Life.
| 2017 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGUs | Acquisition year | Opening balance | Exchange rate differences | Closing balance |
| Card, Norway & Denmark1) | 2002/2004 | 913 | –33 | 880 |
| Life Sweden | 1996/1997 | 2,343 | 2,343 | |
| Investment Management Sweden | 1997/1998 | 1,504 | 1,504 | |
| TOTAL | 4,760 | –33 | 4,727 |
| 2016 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGUs | Acquisition year | New allocation 2016 | Exchange rate differences | Impairment 2016 | Closing balance 2016 |
Remaining book value 2) |
| Equities & Corp, Sweden & Norway1) | 2000 | 879 | –879 | 645 | ||
| Transaction Services Poland | 2008 | 141 | –141 | 373 | ||
| Internet/Telephone Sweden | 1997 | 929 | –929 | |||
| Retail Norway | 2005 | 406 | –406 | |||
| Card, Norway & Denmark1) | 2002/2004 | 826 | 87 | 913 | ||
| Life Sweden | 1996/1997 | 2,334 | 9 | 2,343 | ||
| Life Denmark | 2004 | 299 | –5 | –294 | 3,056 | |
| Investment Management Sweden | 1997/1998 | 3,117 | –1,613 | 1,504 | 1,919 | |
| Investment Management, Finland & Denmark1) | 1997/2002 | 340 | –340 | 9 | ||
| Investment Management, UK & BVI 1) |
2008 | 732 | –732 | |||
| TOTAL | 10,003 | 91 | –5,334 | 4,760 |
1) Some CGU:s are presented together due to thatthe acquisitions are related. Card in Norway andDenmark is related to the Eurocard business. The Equities and Corporate business in Sweden and Norway were acquired in a linked transaction and the Investment Management activities inUK and BVI as well. Investment Managementin Finland andDenmark represents the same type of business and the amounts are minor.
2) Internally assessed remaining book value of CGU's only when impairment has occurred.
Impairment test 2017
Result of impairment test
The yearly impairmenttestfor 2017 was performed in the fourth quarter covering the fourremaining CGUs with allocated goodwill. The impairment test did notresultin any indication ofimpairment.
Estimates and assumptions used: future cash flows
The impairmenttest on goodwill is based on value in use and builds on the business plan for 2018-2020 and projected cash flows for 2021–2022. The long-term growth is based on expectations on inflation 1.5 per cent. The allo cated capital is derived from the Group's internal capital allocation modelthat has been aligned with the regulatory capitalrequirements including the man agement buffer. The cash flows in the business plan starts with the assumptions from the mostrecent Nordic outlook published atthe commencement ofthis business plan process. The main assumptions are; GDP growth in Swe den from 2.6 per centto 2.2 per cent overthree years and other Nordic countries excluding Sweden from 2.3 per centto 1.8 per cent; inflation in Sweden from 1.8 per centto 2.2 per cent and in Other Nordic countries from 1.1 per centto 1.7 per cent. The repo rate in Sweden is assumed to be 0.50 per cent end of 2019.
Estimates and assumptions used: Cost of Equity (CoE) – discount rate The discountrate used is 9.0 per cent post-tax for SEB Group and is deter mined based on information from external sources and applied on all CGUs exceptInvestment Management. The higher discountrate forInvestment Management, 11.0 per cent, is applied due to uncertainty related to limitations to retrocessions, possible further margin squeeze and the current negative interest environmentthat can create squeezed asset prices and volatility.
Sensitivities
An increase of one percentage ofthe discountrate (CoE), a decrease ofthe average growth rates by one percentage pointfor earnings before amortisations during the projection period and a decrease of one percentage point of the long term growth was applied in the sensitivity analysis. The sensitivity analysis carried out did notresultin any indication ofimpairment.
Impairment tests 2016
Two impairmenttests were performed in 2016. In the first quarter a test was triggered by the new principle for allocating goodwill as described above. The yearly impairmenttest was performed in the fourth quarter.
Impairment test first quarter 2016
Goodwill was reallocated to 14 CGU:s. The impairmenttest did resultin ten units were the goodwill were fully impaired and one unit where it was par tially impaired. The total impairmentreported as Depreciation, amortisation and impairment oftangible and intangible assets was SEK 5.3bn within Other in the income statement. This test was based on the business plan for 2016– 2018 and projected cash flows for 2019–2020. The long term growth was based on expectations on inflation 1.5 per cent. The discountrate used was 9.5 per cent post-tax for SEB Group exceptforInvestment Management where 11.5 per cent were used due to uncertainty as described in the test for 2017.
Yearly impairment test fourth quarter 2016
The yearly impairmenttest covering the fourremaining CGUs with allocated goodwill did notresultin any indication ofimpairment. This test was based on the business plan for 2017–2019 and projected cash flows for 2020–2021. The long term growth was based on expectations on inflation of 1.5 per cent. The discountrate used was 9.0 per cent post-tax for SEB Group exceptfor Investment Management where 11.0 per cent were used due to uncertainty as described in the testfor 2017.
Note 28 continued Tangible and intangible assets
Property and equipment
| Group | Parent company | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Equipment | Properties for own operations |
Total | Equipment | Equipment leased to clients ) 1 |
Properties for own operations |
Total |
| Opening balance Additions from acquisitions and capitalisations Reclassifications |
3,248 562 –63 |
106 –76 |
3,354 563 –138 |
2,074 473 |
48,704 5,158 |
2 | 50,780 5,631 |
| Retirements and disposals Exchange rate differences |
–1,281 33 |
–1 –1 |
–1,282 32 |
–1,142 6 |
–4,959 | –6,101 6 |
|
| Acquisition value | 2,500 | 28 | 2,528 | 1,410 | 48,903 | 2 | 50,316 |
| Opening balance Current year's depreciations Current year's impairments Reclassifications |
–2,395 –216 –4 –32 |
–51 –5 48 |
–2,446 –220 –4 16 |
–1,582 –127 |
–14,035 –4,817 |
–15,617 –4,944 |
|
| Retirements and disposals Exchange rate differences |
1,261 –3 |
1 –3 |
1,262 –6 |
1,127 14 |
3,836 –246 |
4,964 –232 |
|
| Accumulated depreciations | –1,389 | –9 | –1,398 | –568 | –15,260 | –15,829 | |
| TOTAL | 1,111 | 19 | 1,130 | 842 | 33,643 | 2 | 34,487 |
| 2016 | |||||||
| Opening balance Additions from acquisitions and capitalisations Reclassifications |
3,105 297 –52 |
97 8 1 |
3,202 305 –51 |
1,888 190 |
50,388 5,437 |
2 | 52,278 5,627 |
| Retirements and disposals Exchange rate differences |
–189 87 |
–8 8 |
–197 95 |
–28 24 |
–7,121 | –7,149 24 |
|
| Acquisition value | 3,248 | 106 | 3,354 | 2,074 | 48,704 | 2 | 50,780 |
| Opening balance Current year's depreciations Current year's impairments Reclassifications |
–2,334 –261 –1 91 |
–43 –5 –2 |
–2,377 –266 –3 91 |
–1,480 –106 |
–12,645 –4,704 |
–14,125 –4,810 |
|
| Retirements and disposals Exchange rate differences |
180 –70 |
8 –9 |
188 –79 |
26 –22 |
2,822 492 |
2,848 470 |
|
| Accumulated depreciations | –2,395 | –51 | –2,446 | –1,582 | –14,035 | –15,617 | |
| TOTAL | 853 | 55 | 908 | 492 | 34,669 | 2 | 35,163 |
1) Equipmentleased to clients are recognised as financial leases and presented as loans in theGroup. See note 44.
Investment properties,Group
| 2017 | 2016 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Investment properties at cost |
Investment properties atfair value |
Properties taken overfor protection of claims |
Total | Investment properties at cost |
Investment properties atfair value |
Properties taken overfor protection of claims |
Total | ||
| Opening balance | 37 | 7,401 | 499 | 7,937 | 43 | 7,169 | 1,248 | 8,460 | |
| Additions from acquisitions and capitalisations Reclassifications |
6 | 768 –7,097 |
3 –278 |
777 –7,375 |
5 | 73 | 52 –494 |
130 –494 |
|
| Retirements and disposals | –17 | –1,374 | –57 | –1,449 | –13 | –236 | –343 | –592 | |
| Exchange rate differences | 53 | 16 | 69 | 2 | 312 | 36 | 350 | ||
| Acquisition value | 26 | –250 | 183 | –41 | 37 | 7,318 | 499 | 7,854 | |
| Opening balance | –6 | –86 | –92 | –5 | –146 | –151 | |||
| Current year's depreciations | –1 | –1 | –2 | –1 | –4 | –5 | |||
| Current year's impairments | –57 | –57 | –127 | –127 | |||||
| Reclassifications | 128 | 128 | 174 | 174 | |||||
| Retirements and disposals | 1 | 17 | 18 | 23 | 23 | ||||
| Exchange rate differences | –1 | –6 | –6 | ||||||
| Accumulated depreciations | –6 | –5 | –6 | –86 | –92 | ||||
| Fair value changes | 250 | 250 | 83 | 83 | |||||
| TOTAL | 20 | 183 | 203 | 31 | 7,401 | 413 | 7,845 |
Note 28 continued Tangible and intangible assets
Net operating earnings from investment properties
| Group | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2016 | |
| External income Operating costs 1) |
563 –189 |
556 –170 |
| TOTAL | 375 | 386 |
1)Direct operating expenses arising frominvestment property that did not generate rental income amounts to SEK 0m (12).
Net operating earnings from properties taken overfor protection of claims
| External income | 19 | 54 |
|---|---|---|
| Operating costs | –41 | –88 |
| TOTAL | –22 | –34 |
SEB may in specific cases acquire assets used as collateral when the loan is in default and the customer can no longer meetits obligations towards SEB. Properties are held and managed during a period with the intention to divestthe assets when deemed appropriate.
29 Other assets
| Group | Parent company | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | |
| Trade and clientreceivables Margin collateral paid Other assets |
13,040 18,994 11,328 |
7,635 29,177 12,306 |
12,871 22,282 7,761 |
7,234 29,177 7,538 |
| TOTAL | 43,362 | 49,118 | 42,914 | 43,949 |
Trade and clientreceivables
| Group | Parent company | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | |
| Trade receivables Clientreceivables |
1,223 11,817 |
1,773 5,862 |
1,251 11,620 |
1,678 5,556 |
| TOTAL | 13,040 | 7,635 | 12,871 | 7,234 |
| Other assets | ||||
| Pension plan assets, net Reinsurers share ofinsurance provisions Other accrued income Prepaid expenses Other |
5,280 185 720 1,272 3,870 |
3,914 539 1,654 635 5,564 |
2,481 5,281 |
1,448 6,090 |
| TOTAL | 11,328 | 12,306 | 7,761 | 7,538 |
30 Liabilities to policyholders
| Group | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2016 | |
| Liabilities to policyholders – investment contracts Liabilities to policyholders – insurance contracts |
284,291 18,911 |
296,618 107,213 |
| TOTAL | 303,202 | 403,831 |
| Liabilities to policyholders - investment contracts 1) | ||
| Opening balance Reclassification from insurance contracts |
296,618 | 271,995 1,316 |
| Reclassification to liabilities of disposal groups classified as held for sale | –37,323 | |
| Change in investment contract provisions 2) | 24,445 | 14,987 |
| Exchange rate differences | 551 | 8,320 |
| TOTAL | 284,291 | 296,618 |
1) Insurance provisions where the policyholders are carrying the risk. The liabilities and the underlying assets are designated atfair value through profit orloss (fair value option). 2) The net of premiums received during the year,return on investmentfunds less payments to the policyholders and deduction offees and policyholders'tax.
Liabilities to policyholders – insurance contracts
| Opening balance 107,213 Transfer of portfolios through divestments –792 Reclassification to investment contracts Reclassification to liabilities of disposal groups classified as held for sale –93,910 Change in otherinsurance contract provisions 1) 5,696 Exchange rate differences 705 |
107,213 |
|---|---|
| 3,838 | |
| 5,622 | |
| –1,316 | |
| 355 | |
| 98,714 |
1) The net of premiums received during the year, allocated return on investmentfunds less payments to the policyholders and deduction offees and policyholders'tax.
31 Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss
| Group | Parent company | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | |
| Liabilities held fortrading Derivatives held fortrading |
28,879 84,571 |
38,845 173,348 |
28,879 86,127 |
38,845 132,861 |
| Held fortrading | 113,450 | 212,193 | 115,006 | 171,706 |
| Derivatives held for hedging | 863 | 1,303 | 863 | 972 |
| TOTAL | 114,313 | 213,496 | 115,869 | 172,678 |
| Liabilities held fortrading | ||||
| Short positions in equity instruments | 14,228 | 10,072 | 14,228 | 10,072 |
| Short positions in debt securities | 10,757 | 9,527 | 10,757 | 9,527 |
| Otherfinancial liabilities Accrued interest |
3,842 53 |
19,224 22 |
3,842 53 |
19,224 22 |
| TOTAL | 28,879 | 38,845 | 28,879 | 38,845 |
| Derivatives held fortrading | ||||
| Interest-related derivatives | 38,509 | 96,955 | 39,360 | 61,795 |
| Currency-related derivatives | 40,669 | 64,420 | 41,438 | 61,415 |
| Equity-related derivatives | 1,928 | 2,010 | 1,950 | 1,855 |
| Other derivatives | 3,465 | 9,963 | 3,379 | 7,796 |
| TOTAL | 84,571 | 173,348 | 86,127 | 132,861 |
| Derivatives held for hedging | ||||
| Fair value hedges | 122 | 12 | 122 | 12 |
| Cash flow hedges | 741 | 957 | 741 | 957 |
| Portfolio hedges forinterestrate risk | 334 | 3 | ||
| TOTAL | 863 | 1,303 | 863 | 972 |
| 32 Other liabilities |
||||
| Group | Parent company | |||
| 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | |
| Trade and client payables | 13,142 | 8,926 | 11,782 | 7,945 |
| Margin collateralreceived | 33,740 | 29,922 | 34,350 | 29,922 |
| Otherliabilities | 18,746 | 17,576 | 10,466 | 8,211 |
| TOTAL | 65,629 | 56,424 | 56,598 | 46,078 |
| Trade and client payables | ||||
| Trade payables | 2,248 | 1,882 | 1,939 | 1,703 |
| Client payables | 10,894 | 7,044 | 9,843 | 6,242 |
| TOTAL | 13,142 | 8,926 | 11,782 | 7,945 |
| Otherliabilities | ||||
| Other accrued expense | 3,917 | 3,986 | 2,781 | 2,623 |
| Prepaid income | 1,373 | 1,477 | ||
| Other | 13,456 | 12,113 | 7,685 | 5,588 |
| TOTAL | 18,746 | 17,576 | 10,466 | 8,211 |
33 Provisions
| Group | Parent company | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | |
| Otherrestructuring and redundancy reserves Reserve for obligations Pensions (note 9b) 1) Other provisions |
810 75 1,325 799 |
642 44 718 829 |
28 47 38 |
35 45 |
| TOTAL | 3,009 | 2,233 | 113 | 80 |
1) Part ofthe net (asset) amountrecognised in balance sheet amounting to SEK 3,955m (3,196) in note 9b.
Otherrestructuring and redundancy reserves
| Opening balance | 642 | 515 | 35 | 42 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Additions | 429 | 308 | ||
| Amounts used | –278 | –186 | –7 | –9 |
| Unused amounts reversed | –3 | –19 | ||
| Other movements | 3 | |||
| Exchange differences | 20 | 21 | 2 | |
| TOTAL | 810 | 642 | 28 | 35 |
The main part ofthe reserve will coverredundancy costs to be used within five years.
Reserve for obligations
| Opening balance | 44 | 81 | 22 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Additions | 49 | 24 | 47 | 19 |
| Amounts used | –34 | –34 | ||
| Unused amounts reversed | –22 | –33 | –7 | |
| Other movements | 2 | 4 | ||
| Exchange differences | 2 | 2 | ||
| TOTAL | 75 | 44 | 47 |
Other provisions
| Opening balance | 829 | 893 | 45 | 80 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Additions | 93 | 53 | ||
| Amounts used | –20 | –91 | –7 | –35 |
| Unused amounts reversed | –30 | –33 | ||
| Other movements | –80 | |||
| Exchange differences | 7 | 7 | ||
| TOTAL | 799 | 829 | 38 | 45 |
Other provisions mainly consist of costs forre-organisation within theGroup to be used within six years and unsettled claims covering all operating segments; among others in the divestedGerman retail business to be settled within two years and tax returns within LifeU.K. branch under decommission.
34 Subordinated liabilities
| Group | Parent company | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | |
| Debenture loans Debenture loans, perpetual Change in the value due to hedge accounting atfair value Accrued interest |
18,171 13,922 25 272 |
24,851 14,738 625 505 |
18,171 13,922 25 272 |
24,851 14,738 625 505 |
| TOTAL | 32,390 | 40,719 | 32,390 | 40,719 |
Debenture loans
| Original nom. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Currency | amount | Book value | interest, % | |
| 2014/2026 | EUR | 1,000 | 9,822 | 2.500 |
| 2016/2028 | EUR | 850 | 8,349 | 1.380 |
| TOTAL | 18,171 |
Debenture loans, perpetual
| Currency | Original nom. amount |
Book value | Rate of interest, % |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | EUR | 500 | 4,914 | 5.625 |
| 2014 | USD | 1,100 | 9,008 | 5.750 |
| TOTAL | 13,922 |
35 Untaxed reserves 1)
| Parent company | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2016 | ||
| Depreciation in excess of plan on office equipment/leased assets Other untaxed reserves |
21,423 6 |
21,755 6 |
|
| TOTAL | 21,429 | 21,761 |
1) In the balance sheet oftheGroup untaxed reserves are reclassified partly as deferred tax liability and partly as restricted equity.
Parent company
| Excess depreciation |
Other untaxed reserves |
Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Opening balance Reversals |
23,460 –1,705 |
6 | 23,466 –1,705 |
| Closing balance 2016 | 21,755 | 6 | 21,761 |
| Reversals | –332 | –332 | |
| CLOSINGBALANCE 2017 | 21,423 | 6 | 21,429 |
36 Pledged assets
| Group | Parent company | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2016 | 2017 2016 |
|||||||
| Pledged assets and comparable securities for own liabilities Pledged assets for own liabilities to insurance policyholders |
477,220 436,890 |
478,998 403,831 |
447,925 | 392,227 | |||||
| Other pledged assets and comparable securities | 136,998 | 154,518 | 114,494 | 152,317 | |||||
| TOTAL | 1,051,109 | 1,037,347 | 562,419 | 544,544 | |||||
| Pledged assets and comparable securities for own liabilities* | |||||||||
| Repos | 77,646 | 3,901 | 77,426 | 3,783 | |||||
| Assets collateralised forissued mortgage covered bonds | 346,057 | 335,094 | 331,073 | 318,412 | |||||
| Assets collateralised forissued public covered bonds | 9,530 | 11,491 | |||||||
| Other collateral | 43,986 | 128,512 | 39,425 | 70,032 | |||||
| of which group internal | 23 18,723 |
||||||||
| TOTAL | 477,220 | 478,998 | 447,925 | 392,227 | |||||
| * Transfers that do not qualify for derecognition. | |||||||||
| Pledged assets for own liabilities to insurance policyholders | |||||||||
| Assets pledged forinsurance contracts | 114,578 | 107,213 | |||||||
| Assets pledged forinvestment contracts1) | 322,312 | 296,618 | |||||||
| TOTAL | 436,890 | 403,831 | |||||||
| 1) Shares in funds. | |||||||||
| Other pledged assets and comparable collateral | |||||||||
| Bonds1) | 57,390 | 80,718 | 57,390 | 80,718 | |||||
| Securities lending | 59,443 | 61,498 | 36,939 | 59,297 | |||||
| Other | 20,166 | 12,302 | 20,166 | 12,302 | |||||
| TOTAL | 136,998 | 154,518 | 114,494 | 152,317 | |||||
| 1) Pledged but unencumbered bonds. | |||||||||
| Transferred financial assets entirely recognized | 1) | ||||||||
| Transferred assets | Associated liabilities | Associated collateralreceived 2) |
|||||||
| Securities lending | Repurchase | 3) | Securities | Repurchase | 3) | ||||
| Group, 2017 | agreements | Other | Total | lending | agreements | Other | Total | Securities lending | |
| Equity instruments | 16,564 | 617 | 17,181 | 1,073 | 150 | 1,223 | 14,005 | ||
| Debt securities | 13,276 | 5,743 | 200 | 19,220 | 149 | 5,736 | 2 | 5,886 | 12,748 |
| Financial assets held fortrading | 29,841 | 5,743 | 817 | 36,401 | 1,222 | 5,736 | 152 | 7,109 | 26,753 |
| 2016 | |||||||||
| Equity instruments | 9,029 | 4,495 | 13,524 | 864 | 4,050 | 4,914 | 7,668 | ||
| Debt securities | 6,769 | 1,283 | 1,258 | 9,310 | 410 | 1,101 | 806 | 2,317 | 5,986 |
| Financial assets held fortrading | 15,798 | 1,283 | 5,753 | 22,834 | 1,274 | 1,101 | 4,856 | 7,231 | 13,654 |
| Debt securities | 118 | 118 | 118 | 118 |
fair value through profit orloss 118 118 118 118
Financial assets designated at
Note 36 continued Pledged assets
| Transferred assets | Associated liabilities | Associated collateralreceived 2) |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parent company, 2017 | Securities lending | Repurchase agreements |
Other 3) |
Total | Securities lending |
Repurchase agreements |
Other 3) |
Total | Securities lending |
| Equity instruments Debt securities |
16,492 13,276 |
5,743 | 617 200 |
17,109 19,220 |
1,041 134 |
5,736 | 1,041 5,869 |
13,916 11,976 |
|
| Financial assets held fortrading | 29,768 | 5,743 | 817 | 36,329 | 1,174 | 5,736 | 6,910 | 25,892 | |
| 2016 | |||||||||
| Equity instruments Debt securities |
9,258 6,734 |
1,283 | 4,451 1,217 |
13,709 9,234 |
1,078 316 |
1,101 | 3,992 810 |
5,070 2,227 |
7,400 5,849 |
| Financial assets held fortrading | 15,992 | 1,283 | 5,668 | 22,943 | 1,394 | 1,101 | 4,802 | 7,297 | 13,249 |
1) Carrying amount and fair value are the same.
2)Otherthan cash collateral.
3)Assets provided as collateralfor derivatives trading, clearing etc. and other collateralized deposits.
Pledged assets
Assets are transferred forrepurchase agreements and securities lending agreements. The counterpart has the rightto sell orrepledge the assets.Other transferred assets referto assets provided as collateralfor derivatives trading, clearing etc., where the title to the instrument has been transferred to the counterparty. The assets continue to be recognised on SEB's balance sheet since SEB is still exposed to changes in the fair value ofthe assets. The carrying value and fair value ofthe assets transferred as collateralforliabilities or con tingentliabilities are shown in the table above.
SEB issues covered bonds secured by mortgage loans pledged as security according to the local legislation. The pledged securities are mainly residen tial mortgages in single family homes,tenant owned homes or otherresidential apartment buildings. The loan-to-value ratio does not exceed 75 per cent. In the event of SEB's insolvency,the holders ofthe covered bonds have priority to the assets registered as collateral.
Obtained collateral
SEB obtains collateral underreverse repurchase agreements and securities borrowing agreements. Underthe terms of standard financial market agree ments SEB has the rightto sell orrepledge the collateral, subjectto returning equivalent securities on settlement ofthe transactions.
More information aboutthe accounting ofrepurchase agreements and securities lending can be found in the accounting principles.
37 Obligations
| Group | Parent company | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | |
| Contingentliabilities Commitments |
122,896 563,181 |
120,231 655,350 |
103,059 435,488 |
97,642 468,953 |
| TOTAL | 686,077 | 775,581 | 538,547 | 566,595 |
| Contingentliabilities1) | ||||
| Own acceptances | 2,122 | 1,318 | 2,096 | 1,274 |
| Financial guarantees given 2) of which group internal |
22,145 | 25,203 | 30,742 11,402 |
26,035 8,831 |
| Other guarantees given of which group internal |
98,629 | 93,710 | 70,221 7,760 |
70,333 2,220 |
| Guarantees given | 120,774 | 118,913 | 100,962 | 96,368 |
| TOTAL | 122,896 | 120,231 | 103,059 | 97,642 |
1) Pledged assets for own orthird party obligations
2) SEB does notregularly securitise its assets and has no outstanding own issues. Forliquidity facilities and otherfacilities to conduits see note 27.
Other contingent liabilities
The parent company has undertaken to the Monetary Authority of Singapore to ensure thatits subsidiary in Luxembourg's branch in Singapore is able to fulfil its commitments.
The parent company has issued a deposit guarantee for SEB AG in Germany to the Bundesverband deutscher Banken e.V.
Legal proceedings
Within the ordinary course of business SEB is engaged in various legal pro ceedings, both in Sweden and in otherjurisdictions. SEB does not expect these currentlegal proceedings to have a significant adverse effect on the financial position ofthe Group.
| Group | Parent company | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commitments1) | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | |
| Granted undrawn creditfacilities of which group internal |
333,917 | 347,273 | 266,966 339 |
275,157 250 |
|
| Unutilised part of overdraftfacilities of which group internal |
132,161 | 143,041 | 75,802 7,333 |
78,077 8,495 |
|
| Repledged collaterals of which group internal |
90,160 | 120,486 | 90,237 286 |
102,933 20,473 |
|
| Other commitments given | 6,944 | 44,550 | 2,484 | 12,786 | |
| Other commitments | 563,181 | 655,350 | 435,488 | 468,953 | |
| TOTAL | 563,181 | 655,350 | 435,488 | 468,953 |
1) Pledged assets for own orthird party obligations
Discretionary managed assets
Discretionary managed assets in the parent company amounted to SEK 498bn (528).
38 Current and non-current assets and liabilities
| Group | 2017 | 2016 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assets | Current assets |
Non-current assets |
Total | Current assets |
Non-current assets |
Total |
| Cash and cash balances with central banks | 177,222 | 177,222 | 151,078 | 151,078 | ||
| Otherlending to central banks | 12,778 | 12,778 | 66,730 | 66,730 | ||
| Loans to creditinstitutions | 26,987 | 7,728 | 34,715 | 42,080 | 8,447 | 50,527 |
| Loans to the public | 616,969 | 867,834 | 885 157 1,484,803 |
598,919 | 854,100 | 162 516 1,453,019 |
| Securities held fortrading | 157,885 | 98 281 , |
162,516 | 198 271 , |
||
| Derivatives held fortrading | 98,281 | 587 6 , |
198,271 | 084 14 , |
||
| Derivatives held for hedging | 6,587 | 203 313 , |
14,084 | 410 155 , |
||
| Financial assets – designated atfair value through profit orloss | 313,203 | , | 410,155 | , | ||
| Financial assets atfair value through profit and loss | 575,955 | 575,955 | 785,026 | 785,026 | ||
| Fair value changes of hedged items in a portfolio hedge | 93 | 93 | 111 | 111 | ||
| Available-for-sale financial assets | 27,776 | 472 27,776 |
35,747 | 268 35,747 |
||
| Investment accounted for using the equity method | 472 | 842 | 268 | 970 | ||
| Otherinvestments in associates | 842 | 970 | ||||
| Investments in subsidiaries and associates | 1,314 | 10 718 1,314 |
1,238 | 405 11 1,238 |
||
| Intangible assets | 1,564 | 9,154 | 130 1 , |
1,432 | 9,973 | 908 , |
| Property and equipment | 222 | 908 | , | 271 | 637 | |
| Investment properties | 203 | 203 | 7,845 | 7,845 | ||
| Tangible and intangible assets | 1,989 | 10,062 | 12,052 | 9,548 | 10,610 | 20,158 |
| Current tax assets | 5,255 | 255 5 260 , |
5,978 | 978 5 329 1 , |
||
| Deferred tax assets | 260 | 1,329 | , | |||
| Tax assets | 5,255 | 260 | 040 13 5,515 |
5,978 | 1,329 | 7 635 7,307 |
| Trade and clientreceivables | 13,040 | , | 7,635 | , | ||
| Otherfinancial assets | 19,007 | 19 007 11 316 , |
29,239 | 29 239 12 244 , |
||
| Other non-financial assets | 11,316 | 12,244 | ||||
| Other assets | 43,362 | , 43,362 |
49,118 | , 49,118 |
||
| Non-current assets and disposal groups classified as held for sale | 184,011 | 184,011 | 587 | 587 | ||
| TOTAL | 1,672,398 | 887,198 | 2,559,596 | 1,744,922 | 875,724 | 2,620,646 |
| 2017 | 2016 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liabilities | Current liabilities |
Non-current liabilities |
Total | Current liabilities |
Non-current liabilities |
Total |
| Deposits from central banks and creditinstitutions | 85,148 | 3,928 | 89,076 | 106,600 | 13,264 | 119,864 |
| Deposits and borrowing from the public | 966,294 | 38,427 | 284 291 1,004,721 |
916,562 | 45,466 | 296 618 962,028 |
| Liabilities to policyholders – investment contracts | 10,902 | 273,389 | 18 911 , |
16,719 | 279,899 | 107 213 , |
| Liabilities to policyholders – insurance contracts | 8,176 | 10,735 | , | 8,403 | 98,810 | , |
| Pooled schemes and liabilities to policyholders | 19,078 | 284,124 | 303,202 | 25,122 | 378,709 | 403,831 |
| Debt securities issued | 184,333 | 429,699 | 28 879 614,033 |
198,709 | 470,171 | 38 845 668,880 |
| Liabilities held fortrading | 28,879 | 84 571 , |
38,845 | 348 173 , |
||
| Derivatives held fortrading | 84,571 | 863 , |
173,348 | 303 1 , |
||
| Derivatives held for hedging | 863 | 1,303 | , | |||
| Financial liabilities atfair value through profit and loss | 114,313 | 114,313 | 213,496 | 213,496 | ||
| Fair value changes of hedged items in portfolio hedge | 1,046 | 1 463 1,046 |
1,537 | 2 184 1,537 |
||
| Currenttax liabilities | 1,463 | 8 079 , |
2,184 | 8 474 , |
||
| Deferred tax liabilities | 8,079 | , | 8,474 | , | ||
| Tax liabilities | 1,463 | 8,079 | 142 13 9,542 |
2,184 | 8,474 | 8 926 10,658 |
| Trade and client payables | 13,142 | 33 766 , |
8,926 | 30 609 , |
||
| Otherfinancial liabilities | 33,766 | 18 720 , |
30,609 | 889 16 , |
||
| Other non-financial liabilities | 18,720 | , | 16,889 | , | ||
| Otherliabilities | 65,629 | 65,629 | 56,424 | 56,424 | ||
| Provisions | 3,009 | 3,009 | 2,233 | 2,233 | ||
| Subordinated liabilities | 272 | 32,118 | 32,390 | 505 | 40,214 | 40,719 |
| Liabilities of disposal groups classified as held for sale | 178,710 | 178,710 | ||||
| TOTAL | 1,616,286 | 799,385 | 2,415,671 | 1,521,139 | 958,531 | 2,479,670 |
Assets and liabilities are classified as current assets and currentliabilities when they are cash or cash equivalents, are hold fortrading purposes, are expected to be sold, settled or consumed in normal business, and are
expected to be realised within twelve months. All other assets and liabilities are classified as non-current.
39 Financial assets and liabilities by class
| Group | Book value | Fair value | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assets, 2017 | Held for trading |
Designated atfair value through p/l / Hedge instruments |
Available for-sale |
Loans and receivables |
Total | Quoted prices in active markets (Level 1) |
Valuation technique using observable inputs (Level 2) |
Valuation technique using non- observable inputs (Level 3) |
Total |
| Loans | 1,694,524 | 1,694,524 | 46,835 | 6,614 | 1,645,286 | 1,698,735 | |||
| Equity instruments | 48,371 | 8,880 | 1,952 | 59,203 | 52,082 | 4,573 | 2,548 | 59,203 | |
| Debt securities | 109,512 | 20,902 | 25,824 | 13,030 | 169,268 | 71,626 | 97,171 | 571 | 169,368 |
| Derivative instruments | 98,281 | 6,587 | 104,868 | 1,250 | 102,930 | 688 | 104,868 | ||
| Financial assets | |||||||||
| – policyholders bearing the risk | 283,420 | 283,420 | 275,737 | 7,053 | 630 | 283,420 | |||
| Other | 93 | 34,007 | 34,100 | 1,960 | 32,140 | 34,100 | |||
| Financial assets | 256,164 | 319,882 | 27,776 | 1,741,561 | 2,345,383 | 449,490 | 218,341 | 1,681,863 | 2,349,694 |
| Other assets (non-financial) | 214,213 | ||||||||
| TOTAL | 256,164 | 319,882 | 27,776 | 1,741,561 | 2,559,596 |
2016
| Loans | 1,704,291 | 1,704,291 | 49,975 | 533 | 1,665,293 | 1,715,801 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity instruments | 40,324 | 30,800 | 3,049 | 74,173 | 50,254 | 13,215 | 10,704 | 74,173 | |
| Debt securities | 122,192 | 83,447 | 32,698 | 15,106 | 253,443 | 102,894 | 147,427 | 3,332 | 253,653 |
| Derivative instruments | 198,271 | 14,084 | 212,355 | 2,593 | 201,621 | 8,141 | 212,355 | ||
| Financial assets | |||||||||
| – policyholders bearing the risk | 295,908 | 295,908 | 275,894 | 15,589 | 4,425 | 295,908 | |||
| Other | 111 | 38,831 | 38,942 | 1,957 | 36,985 | 38,942 | |||
| Financial assets | 360,787 | 424,350 | 35,747 | 1,758,228 | 2,579,112 | 483,567 | 378,385 | 1,728,880 | 2,590,832 |
| Other assets (non-financial) | 41,534 | ||||||||
| TOTAL | 360,787 | 424,350 | 35,747 | 1,758,228 | 2,620,646 |
| Book value | Fair value | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liabilities, 2017 | Held for trading |
Designated atfair value through p/l / Hedge instruments |
Other financial liabilities |
Total | Quoted prices in active markets (Level 1) |
Valuation technique using observable inputs (Level 2) |
Valuation technique using non- observable inputs (Level 3) |
Total |
| Deposits | 1,093,798 | 1,093,798 | 30,286 | 4,277 | 1,063,928 | 1,098,491 | ||
| Equity instruments | 14,228 | 14,228 | 13,984 | 244 | 14,228 | |||
| Debt securities | 10,809 | 24,388 | 622,035 | 657,232 | 6,254 | 653,229 | 2,677 | 662,160 |
| Derivative instruments | 84,569 | 863 | 85,432 | 910 | 83,723 | 799 | 85,432 | |
| Liabilities to policyholders | ||||||||
| – investment contracts | 284,291 | 284,291 | 276,482 | 7,185 | 624 | 284,291 | ||
| Other | 3,842 | 1,046 | 46,912 | 51,800 | 21 | 3,897 | 47,882 | 51,800 |
| Financial liabilities | 113,448 | 310,588 | 1,762,745 | 2,186,781 | 327,937 | 752,311 | 1,116,154 | 2,196,402 |
| Otherliabilities (non-financial) Total equity |
228,890 143,925 |
|||||||
| TOTAL | 113,448 | 310,588 | 1,762,745 | 2,559,596 |
2016
| Deposits Equity instruments |
10,071 | 1,045,056 | 1,045,056 10,071 |
30,491 9,798 |
325 2 |
1,016,048 271 |
1,046,864 10,071 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt securities | 9,549 | 30,992 | 715,443 | 755,984 | 7,074 | 727,440 | 34,099 | 768,613 |
| Derivative instruments | 173,348 | 1,303 | 174,651 | 2,808 | 168,207 | 3,636 | 174,651 | |
| Liabilities to policyholders | ||||||||
| – investment contracts | 296,618 | 296,618 | 276,666 | 15,542 | 4,410 | 296,618 | ||
| Other | 19,225 | 1,537 | 39,535 | 60,297 | 10 | 19,244 | 41,043 | 60,297 |
| Financial liabilities | 212,193 | 330,450 | 1,800,034 | 2,342,677 | 326,847 | 930,760 | 1,099,507 | 2,357,114 |
| Otherliabilities (non-financial) Total equity |
136,993 140,976 |
|||||||
| TOTAL | 212,193 | 330,450 | 1,800,034 | 2,620,646 |
Note 39 continued Financial assets and liabilities by class
| Parent company | Book value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assets, 2017 | Held for trading |
Designated atfair value through p/l / Hedge instruments |
Available- for-sale |
Loans and receivables |
Total |
| Loans Equity instruments Debt securities Derivative instruments Other |
48,370 109,258 97,640 |
9 6,580 |
52,286 8,802 |
1,480,014 7,010 36,349 |
1,480,014 100,665 125,070 104,220 36,349 |
| Financial assets Other assets (non-financial) |
255,268 | 6,589 | 61,088 | 1,523,373 | 1,846,318 45,845 |
| TOTAL | 255,268 | 6,589 | 61,088 | 1,523,373 | 1,892,163 |
| 2016 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loans | 1,520,966 | 1,520,966 | |||
| Equity instruments | 40,323 | 87 | 53,365 | 93,775 | |
| Debt securities | 122,012 | 9,309 | 8,703 | 140,024 | |
| Derivative instruments | 147,124 | 12,649 | 159,773 | ||
| Other | 37,592 | 37,592 | |||
| Financial assets | 309,459 | 12,736 | 62,674 | 1,567,261 | 1,952,130 |
| Other assets (non-financial) | 47,714 | ||||
| TOTAL | 309,459 | 12,736 | 62,674 | 1,567,261 | 1,999,844 |
| Book value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liabilities, 2017 | Held for trading |
Designated atfair value through p/l / Hedge instruments |
Other financial liabilities |
Total |
| Deposits | 949,690 | 949,690 | ||
| Equity instruments | 14,228 | 14,228 | ||
| Debt securities | 14,651 | 642,682 | 657,333 | |
| Derivative instruments | 86,127 | 863 | 86,990 | |
| Other | 46,132 | 46,132 | ||
| Financial liabilities | 115,006 | 863 | 1,638,504 | 1,754,373 |
| Otherliabilities (non-financial) | 11,599 | |||
| Total equity | 126,191 | |||
| TOTAL | 115,006 | 863 | 1,638,504 | 1,892,163 |
2016
| Deposits | 951,436 | 951,436 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity instruments | 10,072 | 10,072 | ||
| Debt securities | 28,773 | 704,905 | 733,678 | |
| Derivative instruments | 132,861 | 972 | 133,833 | |
| Other | 37,867 | 37,867 | ||
| Financial liabilities | 171,706 | 972 | 1,694,208 | 1,866,886 |
| Otherliabilities (non-financial) | 9,823 | |||
| Total equity | 123,135 | |||
| TOTAL | 171,706 | 972 | 1,694,208 | 1,999,844 |
SEB has grouped its financial instruments by class taking into account the cha racteristics of the instruments:
Loans and deposits includes financial assets and liabilities with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. Loans are further specified in note 17a and 19.
Equity instruments includes shares, rights issues and similar contractual rights of other entities.
Debt instruments includes contractual rights to receive or obligations to deliver cash on a predetermined date. These are further specified in note 17f and 41.
Derivative instruments includes options, futures, swaps and other derived products held for trading and hedging purposes. These are further specified in notes 22, 31 and 42.
Investment contracts include those assets and liabilities in the Life insurance operations where the policyholder is carrying the risk of the contractual agre ement (is not qualified as an insurance contract under IFRS 4). The Life insu rance operations are further specified in note 46.
Insurance contracts includes those assets and liabilities in the Life insurance operations where SEB is carrying the insurance risk of a contractual agre ement (is qualified as an insurance contract under IFRS 4). The Life insurance operations are further specified in note 46.
Other includes other financial assets and liabilities recognised in accordan ce with IAS 39, i.e. Trade and client receivables/payables and Withheld/paid margins of safety.
40 Financial assets and liabilities subject to offsetting or netting arrangements
| Financial assets and liabilities subjectto offsetting or netting arrangements | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Related arrangements | Otherinstruments | |||||||
| Group, 2017 | Gross amounts |
Offset | Net amounts in balance sheet |
Master netting arrangements |
Collaterals received/ pledged |
Net amounts |
in balance sheet not subjectto net- ting arrangements |
Total in balance sheet |
| Derivatives Reversed repo receivables Securities borrowing |
111,634 104,354 3,782 |
–7,826 –61,735 |
103,808 42,620 3,782 |
–58,922 –6,613 –3,165 |
–29,374 –36,007 –512 |
15,512 105 |
1,060 12,955 |
104,868 42,620 16,736 |
| Clientreceivables | 11,817 | 11,817 | ||||||
| ASSETS | 219,770 | –69,560 | 150,210 | –68,701 | –65,892 | 15,617 | 25,832 | 176,042 |
| Derivatives Repo payables |
92,496 68,348 |
–7,826 –61,735 |
84,670 6,613 |
–58,922 –6,613 |
–18,293 | 7,455 | 763 | 85,434 6,613 |
| Securities lending Client payables |
9,604 | 9,604 | –3,165 | –6,152 | 287 | 911 10,894 |
10,515 10,894 |
|
| LIABILITIES | 170,448 | –69,560 | 100,888 | –68,701 | –24,445 | 7,742 | 12,569 | 113,456 |
| 2016 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Derivatives | 215,367 | –4,447 | 210,920 | –123,698 | –34,841 | 52,381 | 1,435 | 212,355 |
| Reversed repo receivables | 99,828 | –35,332 | 64,496 | –682 | –63,612 | 202 | 1 | 64,497 |
| Securities borrowing | 25,265 | 25,265 | –7,616 | –17,649 | 5,525 | 30,790 | ||
| Clientreceivables | 43 | –42 | 1 | 1 | 5,861 | 5,862 | ||
| ASSETS | 340,503 | –39,821 | 300,682 | –131,996 | –116,102 | 52,584 | 12,822 | 313,504 |
| Derivatives | 176,773 | –4,447 | 172,326 | –123,698 | –31,547 | 17,081 | 2,325 | 174,651 |
| Repo payables | 36,926 | –35,332 | 1,594 | –682 | –795 | 117 | 1,594 | |
| Securities lending | 25,155 | 25,155 | –7,616 | –8,765 | 8,774 | 6 | 25,161 | |
| Client payables | 42 | –42 | 7,044 | 7,044 | ||||
| LIABILITIES | 238,896 | –39,821 | 199,075 | –131,996 | –41,107 | 25,972 | 9,375 | 208,450 |
| Financial assets and liabilities subjectto offsetting or netting arrangements | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Related arrangements | Otherinstruments | ||||||||
| Parent company, 2017 | Gross amounts |
Offset | Net amounts in balance sheet |
Master netting arrangements |
Collaterals received/ pledged |
Net amounts |
in balance sheet not subjectto net- ting arrangements |
Total in balance sheet |
|
| Derivatives Reversed repo receivables Securities borrowing Clientreceivables |
104,220 104,354 3,468 |
–61,735 | 104,220 42,620 3,468 |
–57,904 –6,613 –3,165 |
–29,155 –36,007 –303 |
17,161 | 35,153 11,620 |
104,220 42,620 38,621 11,620 |
|
| ASSETS | 212,043 | –61,735 | 150,308 | –67,682 | –65,465 | 17,161 | 46,773 | 197,081 | |
| Derivatives Repo payables Securities lending Client payables |
86,990 68,349 8,505 |
–61,735 | 86,990 6,614 8,505 |
–57,904 –6,614 –3,165 |
–18,293 –5,340 |
10,793 | 35,254 9,843 |
86,990 6,614 43,759 9,843 |
|
| LIABILITIES | 163,844 | –61,735 | 102,110 | –67,683 | –23,633 | 10,793 | 45,097 | 147,207 | |
| 2016 | |||||||||
| Derivatives Reversed repo receivables Securities borrowing Clientreceivables |
159,773 100,150 24,396 42 |
–35,332 –42 |
159,773 64,818 24,396 |
–80,887 –682 –7,616 |
–19,811 –63,612 –11,642 |
59,075 524 5,138 |
5,423 5,556 |
159,773 64,818 29,819 5,556 |
|
| ASSETS | 284,361 | –35,374 | 248,987 | –89,185 | –95,065 | 64,737 | 10,979 | 259,966 | |
| Derivatives Repo payables Securities lending Client payables |
133,833 36,808 14,431 42 |
–35,332 –42 |
133,833 1,476 14,431 |
–80,887 –682 –7,616 |
–43,422 –4,128 –9,051 |
9,524 –3,334 –2,236 |
6,242 | 133,833 1,476 14,431 6,242 |
|
| LIABILITIES | 185,114 | –35,374 | 149,740 | –89,185 | –56,601 | 3,954 | 6,242 | 155,982 |
The table shows financial assets and liabilities that are presented netin the balance sheet or with potentialrights to off-set associated with enforceable master netting arrangements or similar arrangements,together with related collateral.
Financial assets and liabilities subjectto enforceable master netting arrange ments or similar arrangements that are not presented netin the balance sheet are arrangements that are usually enforceable in the case of bankruptcy or default but notin the ordinary course of business or arrangements where SEB does not have the intention to settle the instruments simultaneously.
Financial assets and liabilities are presented netin the balance sheet when SEB has legally enforceable rights to set-off, in the ordinary cause of business and in the case of bankruptcy, and intends to settle on a net basis orto realize the assets and settle the liabilities simultaneously. Repos with central counterparty clearing houses that SEB has agreements with and clientreceivables and client payables are examples ofinstruments that are presented netin the balance sheet.
Assets and liabilities that are not subjectto offsetting or netting arrange ments, i.e those that are only subjectto collateral agreements, are presented as Otherinstruments in balance sheet not subject to netting arrangements.
41 Debt securities by issuers
| Eligible debt securities | 1) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| -------------------------- | -- | -- | ---- |
| Group, 2017 | Swedish government |
Swedish municipalities |
Other Swedish issuers – non financial companies |
Other Swedish issuers – other financial companies |
Foreign government |
Other foreign issuers |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loans to the public Securities held fortrading Insurance assets atfair value Otherfinancial assets atfair value |
7,893 783 |
4,606 859 |
751 | 15,000 3,935 |
6,875 18,759 1,632 |
6,020 15 524 |
12,895 46,274 8,485 |
| through profit orloss Available-for-sale financial assets |
304 | 6,259 21,641 |
876 3,441 |
7,135 25,386 |
|||
| TOTAL | 8,980 | 5,465 | 751 | 18,935 | 55,167 | 10,877 | 100,175 |
| 2016 | |||||||
| Loans to creditinstitutions Loans to the public Securities held fortrading Insurance assets atfair value Otherfinancial assets atfair value through profit orloss Available-for-sale financial assets |
10,088 1,437 299 |
4,528 453 |
3,285 | 6,690 19,374 7,635 5,340 27,437 |
382 6,006 1 30,995 829 3,690 |
382 12,696 33,991 43,805 6,169 31,426 |
|
| TOTAL | 11,824 | 4,981 | 3,285 | 66,476 | 41,903 | 128,469 | |
| Parent company, 2017 Loans to the public Securities held fortrading |
7,893 | 4,606 | 15,000 | 6,875 18,546 |
6,875 46,045 |
||
| Available-for-sale financial assets | 6,087 | 6,087 | |||||
| TOTAL | 7,893 | 4,606 | 15,000 | 31,508 | 59,007 | ||
| 2016 Loans to the public Securities held fortrading Available-for-sale financial assets |
10,088 | 4,528 | 6,690 19,195 6,588 |
6,690 33,811 6,588 |
|||
| TOTAL | 10,088 | 4,528 | 32,473 | 47,089 |
1)Accrued interest excluded.
Eligible papers are considered as such ifthey, according to national legislation, are accepted by the Central bank in the country in which SEB is located.
Other debt securities 1)
| Group, 2017 | Swedish government and municipalities |
Swedish mortgage institutions |
Other Swedish issuers – non financial companies |
Other Swedish issuers – other financial companies |
Foreign government |
Other foreign issuers |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Securities held fortrading Insurance assets atfair value Otherfinancial assets atfair value |
254 | 15,740 317 |
1,807 1,822 |
6,376 619 |
23 998 |
38,874 369 |
62,820 4,379 |
| through profit orloss Available-for-sale financial assets |
813 270 |
813 270 |
|||||
| TOTAL | 254 | 16,057 | 3,629 | 6,995 | 2,104 | 39,243 | 68,283 |
| 2016 | |||||||
| Loans to the public Securities held fortrading Insurance assets atfair value Otherfinancial assets atfair value |
306 | 26,683 | 1,368 1,094 |
5,525 1,132 |
7 2,168 |
1,896 54,070 27,887 |
1,896 87,653 32,587 |
| through profit orloss Available-for-sale financial assets |
301 1,021 |
301 1,021 |
|||||
| TOTAL | 306 | 26,683 | 2,462 | 6,657 | 3,497 | 83,853 | 123,458 |
| Parent company, 2017 | |||||||
| Securities held fortrading Available-for-sale financial assets |
15,740 | 1,789 | 6,393 2,575 |
38,872 29 |
62,793 2,604 |
||
| TOTAL | 15,740 | 1,789 | 8,968 | 38,901 | 65,398 | ||
| 2016 | |||||||
| Loans to the public Securities held fortrading Available-for-sale financial assets |
26,683 | 1,293 | 5,600 | 1,881 54,077 2,608 |
1,881 87,653 2,608 |
||
| TOTAL | 26,683 | 1,293 | 5,600 | 58,566 | 92,142 |
1)Accrued interest excluded.
42 Derivative instruments
| Group | Parent company | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | |
| Interest-related | 59,908 | 133,778 | 58,750 | 86,172 |
| Currency-related | 37,904 | 65,056 | 38,494 | 63,144 |
| Equity-related | 3,349 | 4,990 | 3,355 | 3,734 |
| Other | 3,708 | 8,531 | 3,621 | 6,723 |
| Positive replacement values | 104,868 | 212,355 | 104,220 | 159,773 |
| Interest-related | 39,372 | 98,258 | 40,223 | 62,767 |
| Currency-related | 40,669 | 64,420 | 41,438 | 61,415 |
| Equity-related | 1,928 | 2,010 | 1,950 | 1,855 |
| Other | 3,465 | 9,963 | 3,379 | 7,796 |
| Negative replacement values | 85,434 | 174,651 | 86,990 | 133,833 |
| Positive replacement values | Negative replacement values | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group, 2017 | Nominal amount | Book value | Nominal amount | Book value |
| Options Futures Swaps |
127,819 2,026,323 3,125,249 |
2,719 127 57,062 |
194,210 2,379,972 2,808,063 |
3,949 179 35,244 |
| Interest-related | 5,279,390 | 59,908 | 5,382,245 | 39,372 |
| Options Futures Swaps |
202,288 322,076 1,540,961 |
2,082 7,741 28,081 |
195,228 497,127 1,576,686 |
2,225 11,880 26,563 |
| Currency-related of which exchange traded |
2,065,326 | 37,904 3 |
2,269,041 | 40,669 42 |
| Options Futures Swaps |
20,630 120,991 |
2,226 62 1,060 |
15,835 168,563 |
576 29 1,322 |
| Equity-related of which exchange traded |
141,621 | 3,349 278 |
184,398 | 1,928 146 |
| Options Futures Swaps |
43,648 26,270 16,334 |
1,801 951 955 |
58,023 3,387 20,242 |
2,550 65 850 |
| Other of which exchange traded |
86,252 28,802 |
3,708 1,068 |
81,652 3,141 |
3,465 375 |
| TOTAL of which exchange traded |
7,572,590 28,802 |
104,868 1,349 |
7,917,336 3,141 |
85,434 563 |
2016
| Options | 574,200 | 32,326 | 1,004,430 | 25,284 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Futures | 2,648,672 | 1,211 | 2,466,844 | 2,170 |
| Swaps | 3,848,336 | 100,241 | 2,735,011 | 70,804 |
| Interest-related | 7,071,208 | 133,778 | 6,206,285 | 98,258 |
| of which exchange traded | 259,062 | 16 | 178,790 | 9 |
| Options | 163,012 | 4,461 | 140,597 | 4,534 |
| Futures | 459,163 | 15,694 | 388,388 | 10,389 |
| Swaps | 1,533,842 | 44,901 | 1,647,949 | 49,497 |
| Currency-related of which exchange traded |
2,156,017 | 65,056 2 |
2,176,934 | 64,420 34 |
| Options | 31,059 | 2,415 | 19,841 | 780 |
| Futures | 5 | 17 | 2 | 35 |
| Swaps | 691,265 | 2,558 | 40,115 | 1,195 |
| Equity-related | 722,329 | 4,990 | 59,958 | 2,010 |
| of which exchange traded | 5 | 203 | 95 | 123 |
| Options | 47,860 | 2,017 | 40,998 | 2,315 |
| Futures | 35,653 | 3,896 | 19,309 | 4,218 |
| Swaps | 6,139 | 2,618 | 33,719 | 3,430 |
| Other | 89,652 | 8,531 | 94,026 | 9,963 |
| of which exchange traded | 30,670 | 3,159 | 6,571 | 3,330 |
| TOTAL | 10,039,206 | 212,355 | 8,537,203 | 174,651 |
| of which exchange traded | 289,737 | 3,380 | 185,456 | 3,496 |
Note 42 continued Derivative instruments
| Positive replacement values | Negative replacement values | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parent company, 2017 | Nominal amount | Book value | Nominal amount | Book value |
| Options | 106,346 | 2,333 | 147,622 | 3,512 |
| Futures | 2,026,323 | 127 | 2,379,972 | 179 |
| Swaps | 3,135,062 | 56,290 | 2,825,626 | 36,531 |
| Interest-related | 5,267,731 | 58,750 | 5,353,220 | 40,223 |
| Options | 211,368 | 2,142 | 199,247 | 2,220 |
| Futures | 349,973 | 8,272 | 492,378 | 11,783 |
| Swaps | 1,553,851 | 28,080 | 1,640,304 | 27,434 |
| Currency-related of which exchange traded |
2,115,192 | 38,494 3 |
2,331,929 | 41,438 42 |
| Options | 20,665 | 2,232 | 15,803 | 599 |
| Futures | 62 | 29 | ||
| Swaps | 120,991 | 1,060 | 168,563 | 1,322 |
| Equity-related of which exchange traded |
141,656 | 3,355 278 |
184,366 | 1,950 146 |
| Options | 42,192 | 1,718 | 59,493 | 2,467 |
| Futures | 25,890 | 948 | 3,767 | 62 |
| Swaps | 16,334 | 955 | 20,242 | 850 |
| Other | 84,417 | 3,621 | 83,502 | 3,379 |
| of which exchange traded | 26,952 | 981 | 4,991 | 289 |
| TOTAL | 7,608,996 | 104,220 | 7,953,016 | 86,990 |
| of which exchange traded | 26,952 | 1,263 | 4,991 | 477 |
| 2016 | ||||
| Options | 96,395 | 4,106 | 87,081 | 4,302 |
| Futures | 2,648,610 | 1,212 | 2,452,956 | 1,375 |
| Swaps | 3,251,815 | 80,854 | 2,718,139 | 57,090 |
| Interest-related of which exchange traded |
5,996,820 259,000 |
86,172 | 5,258,176 178,500 |
62,767 |
| Options | 147,641 | 2,991 | 123,246 | 2,977 |
| Futures | 336,700 | 13,097 | 261,143 | 9,901 |
| Swaps | 1,608,724 | 47,056 | 1,786,265 | 48,537 |
| Currency-related | 2,093,065 | 63,144 | 2,170,654 | 61,415 |
| Options | 31,059 | 2,378 | 19,808 | 756 |
| Futures | 17 | 35 | ||
| Swaps | 667,259 | 1,339 | 32,271 | 1,064 |
| Equity-related of which exchange traded |
698,318 | 3,734 | 52,079 15 |
1,855 |
| Options | 33,201 | 1,905 | 66,174 | 2,203 |
| Futures | 35,642 | 3,896 | 19,298 | 4,217 |
| Swaps | 13,395 | 922 | 117 | 1,376 |
| Other | 82,238 | 6,723 | 85,589 | 7,796 |
| of which, cleared | 29,209 | 5,111 | ||
| TOTAL | 8,870,441 | 159,773 | 7,566,498 | 133,833 |
| of which exchange traded | 288,209 | 183,626 |
43 Future minimum lease payments for operational leases*
| Group | Parent company | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | |
| Year 2017 | 1,274 | 885 | ||
| Year 2018 | 1,042 | 1,048 | 791 | 721 |
| Year 2019 | 836 | 791 | 606 | 549 |
| Year 2020 | 694 | 683 | 486 | 465 |
| Year 2021 | 584 | 549 | 439 | 382 |
| Year 2022 and later | 5,037 | 4,890 | 4,711 | 4,532 |
| TOTAL | 8,193 | 9,235 | 7,033 | 7,534 |
* Leases for premises and other operational leases where SEB is the lessee.
44 Finance leases*
| Group | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2016 | |
| Book value | 62,107 | 61,039 |
| Gross investment | 66,694 | 65,924 |
| Present value of minimum lease paymentreceivables | 61,904 | 60,074 |
| Unearned finance income | 4,391 | 4,668 |
| The unguaranteed residual value | 480 | 463 |
| Reserve forimpaired uncollectable minimum lease payments | –176 | –199 |
* Financial leases where SEB is the lessor.
| Group 2017 | Group 2016 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Book value |
Gross investment |
Present value |
Book value |
Gross investment |
Present value | |
| Remaining maturity – maximum 1 year – more than 1 year but maximum 5 years – more than 5 years |
8,097 28,663 25,347 |
8,377 30,073 28,244 |
8,113 28,817 24,974 |
6,240 27,666 27,133 |
6,983 28,830 30,111 |
6,740 27,151 26,183 |
| TOTAL | 62,107 | 66,694 | 61,904 | 61,039 | 65,924 | 60,074 |
The leased assets mainly comprise transport vehicles, machinery and facilities. The largestlease engagement amounts to SEK 6.6 billion (7.5).
45 Assets and liabilities distributed by main currencies
| Group, 2017 | SEK | EUR | USD | GBP | DKK | NOK | Other | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash and cash balances and loans to central banks | 5,680 | 79,653 | 57,802 | 151 | 4,149 | 5,159 | 37,406 | 190,000 |
| Loans to creditinstitutions | 1,511 | 9,565 | 13,731 | 3,303 | 897 | 814 | 4,895 | 34,715 |
| Loans to the public | 893,926 | 326,215 | 118,961 | 19,254 | 48,947 | 58,279 | 19,221 | 1,484,803 |
| Otherfinancial assets | 392,271 | 114,510 | 73,548 | 7,749 | 17,516 | 23,474 | 6,802 | 635,871 |
| Other assets | 21,817 | 56,927 | 32,971 | 2,976 | 96,465 | 211 | 2,839 | 214,207 |
| TOTALASSETS | 1,315,204 | 586,870 | 297,012 | 33,434 | 167,974 | 87,937 | 71,164 | 2,559,596 |
| Deposits from central banks | 339 | 3,530 | 21,127 | 1,605 | 165 | 16,502 | 975 | 44,243 |
| Deposits from creditinstitutions | 14,996 | 8,793 | 12,116 | 1,153 | 2,367 | 1,839 | 3,571 | 44,833 |
| Deposits and borrowing from the public | 506,756 | 257,308 | 133,594 | 36,904 | 20,230 | 31,039 | 18,891 | 1,004,721 |
| Otherfinancial liabilities | 567,439 | 265,233 | 215,023 | 22,895 | 11,682 | 8,392 | 2,499 | 1,093,164 |
| Otherliabilities | 31,367 | 42,813 | 8,134 | 2,507 | 139,263 | 1,600 | 3,025 | 228,710 |
| Total equity | 143,925 | 143,925 | ||||||
| TOTAL LIABILITIESANDEQUITY | 1,264,822 | 577,677 | 389,994 | 65,064 | 173,707 | 59,372 | 28,961 | 2,559,596 |
| 2016 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash and cash balances and loans to central banks | 61,808 | 83,837 | 55,755 | 126 | 5,595 | 124 | 10,563 | 217,808 |
| Loans to creditinstitutions | 1,410 | 13,101 | 26,444 | 2,565 | 1,572 | 557 | 4,878 | 50,527 |
| Loans to the public | 842,883 | 318,592 | 134,739 | 18,311 | 54,365 | 62,143 | 21,986 | 1,453,019 |
| Otherfinancial assets | 396,970 | 210,719 | 101,198 | 10,483 | 105,136 | 23,214 | 10,038 | 857,758 |
| Other assets | 19,983 | 9,333 | 975 | 598 | 9,558 | 451 | 636 | 41,534 |
| TOTALASSETS | 1,323,054 | 635,582 | 319,111 | 32,083 | 176,226 | 86,489 | 48,101 | 2,620,646 |
| Deposits from central banks | 304 | 21,323 | 26,398 | 2,301 | 4,066 | 54,392 | ||
| Deposits from creditinstitutions Deposits and borrowing from the public |
18,265 483,722 |
23,594 249,599 |
6,969 143,092 |
134 26,381 |
10,313 15,839 |
2,663 27,388 |
3,534 16,007 |
65,472 962,028 |
| Otherfinancial liabilities | 563,111 | 355,529 | 259,103 | 23,351 | 46,240 | 9,030 | 4,421 | 1,260,785 |
| Otherliabilities | 27,976 | 8,863 | 2,411 | 1,058 | 93,783 | 1,680 | 1,222 | 136,993 |
| Total equity | 140,976 | 140,976 |
| Parent company, 2017 | SEK | EUR | USD | GBP | DKK | NOK | Other | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash and cash balances with central banks | 161 | 18 | 57,670 | 1,566 | 4,793 | 33,532 | 97,741 | |
| Loans to creditinstitutions | 15,826 | 134,821 | 18,003 | 5,627 | 6,415 | 5,703 | 6,197 | 192,591 |
| Loans to the public | 855,405 | 101,073 | 110,469 | 13,716 | 48,259 | 51,014 | 16,887 | 1,196,824 |
| Otherfinancial assets | 149,078 | 83,877 | 70,754 | 7,947 | 17,633 | 23,409 | 6,464 | 359,163 |
| Other assets | 17,597 | 21,235 | 1,560 | 1,601 | 946 | 2,540 | 365 | 45,845 |
| TOTALASSETS | 1,038,069 | 341,024 | 258,456 | 28,891 | 74,820 | 87,459 | 63,444 | 1,892,163 |
| Deposits from central banks | 339 | 3,529 | 21,127 | 1,605 | 165 | 16,502 | 975 | 44,242 |
| Deposits from creditinstitutions | 30,034 | 22,009 | 18,242 | 1,797 | 2,748 | 4,494 | 3,974 | 83,297 |
| Deposits and borrowing from the public | 498,066 | 103,265 | 122,977 | 35,298 | 20,718 | 28,018 | 13,811 | 822,151 |
| Otherfinancial liabilities | 326,773 | 219,083 | 214,254 | 22,281 | 11,712 | 8,330 | 2,251 | 804,683 |
| Otherliabilities | 3,381 | 964 | 3,554 | 319 | 304 | 966 | 2,111 | 11,599 |
| Shareholders' equity and untaxed reserves | 126,191 | 126,191 | ||||||
| TOTAL LIABILITIESANDEQUITY | 984,784 | 348,849 | 380,153 | 61,300 | 35,645 | 58,309 | 23,122 | 1,892,163 |
| 2016 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash and cash balances with central banks | 154 | 3,505 | 55,659 | 1,656 | 65 | 9,632 | 70,671 | |
| Loans to creditinstitutions | 74,309 | 156,123 | 30,507 | 4,938 | 8,308 | 5,260 | 7,614 | 287,059 |
| Loans to the public | 802,335 | 103,325 | 126,832 | 13,018 | 53,500 | 54,893 | 18,192 | 1,172,095 |
| Otherfinancial assets | 175,607 | 112,558 | 66,908 | 8,326 | 27,588 | 23,073 | 8,245 | 422,305 |
| Other assets | 18,312 | 21,193 | 1,391 | 1,848 | 1,509 | 3,036 | 425 | 47,714 |
| TOTALASSETS | 1,070,717 | 396,704 | 281,297 | 28,130 | 92,561 | 86,327 | 44,108 | 1,999,844 |
| Deposits from central banks | 304 | 21,153 | 26,377 | 2,301 | 4,065 | 54,200 | ||
| Deposits from creditinstitutions | 33,038 | 47,667 | 14,693 | 1,041 | 10,297 | 4,453 | 3,463 | 114,652 |
| Deposits and borrowing from the public | 475,728 | 95,457 | 131,139 | 24,710 | 16,228 | 25,648 | 13,674 | 782,584 |
| Otherfinancial liabilities | 368,972 | 245,943 | 253,462 | 20,842 | 13,751 | 8,992 | 3,488 | 915,450 |
| Otherliabilities | 4,071 | 247 | 1,929 | 870 | 453 | 1,100 | 1,153 | 9,823 |
| Shareholders' equity and untaxed reserves | 123,135 | 123,135 |
46 Life insurance operations
| Group | ||
|---|---|---|
| INCOME STATEMENT | 2017 | 2016 |
| Premium income, net Income investment contracts |
10,039 | 9,268 |
| –Own fees including risk gain/loss – Commissions from fund companies |
1,525 1,928 |
1,499 1,735 |
| 3,453 | 3,234 | |
| Netinvestmentincome Other operating income |
5,103 556 |
6,704 473 |
| Total income, gross | 19,151 | 19,679 |
| Claims paid, net Change in insurance contract provisions |
–8,174 –5,649 |
–8,949 –5,534 |
| Total income, net | 5,329 | 5,196 |
| Of which from other units within the SEB group | 1,595 | 1,521 |
| Direct acquisition costs investment and insurance contracts Change in deferred acquisition costs |
–1,042 –75 |
–1,013 –84 |
| –1,117 | –1,097 | |
| Commissions received and profit share from ceded reinsurance Other expenses |
115 –1,838 |
110 –1,819 |
| Total expenses | –2,840 | –2,806 |
| OPERATINGPROFIT | 2,489 | 2,390 |
CHANGE IN SURPLUSVALUES IN DIVISION LIFE
| Present value of new sales 1) Return on existing policies Realised surplus value in existing policies Actual outcome compared to assumptions 2) |
1,045 1,856 –2,999 –39 |
1,208 1,781 –2,915 371 |
|---|---|---|
| Change in surplus values from ongoing business, gross | –136 | 445 |
| Capitalisation of acquisition costs Amortisation of capitalised acquisition costs Change in deferred front end fees |
–882 957 21 |
–859 943 –45 |
| Change in surplus values from ongoing business, net 3) |
–40 | 484 |
| Financial effects due to short-term marketfluctuations 4) Change in assumptions 5) |
769 134 |
531 202 |
| TOTAL CHANGE IN SURPLUSVALUES 6) | 862 | 1,217 |
Calculations of surplus value in the life insurance operations are based on assumptions ofthe future development of existing insurance contracts and a risk-adjusted discountrate. The mostimportant assumptions (Swedish unit-linked - which represent 63 per cent (65) ofthe total surplus value).
| Discountrate | 7.0% | 7.0% |
|---|---|---|
| Surrender of endowmentinsurance contracts: contracts signed within 1 year/ 1–4 years / 5 years / 6 years /thereafter | 2%/6%/ 19%/ 15%/9% 2%/6%/20%/ 15%/10% | |
| Lapse rate ofregular premiums, unit-linked | 8.3 | 8.1% |
| Growth in fund units, gross before fees and taxes | 5.0% | 5.0% |
| Inflation CPI / Inflation expenses | 2% / 3% | 2% / 3% |
| Expected return on solvency margin | 3% | 3% |
| Rightto transfer policy, unit-linked | 3.1% | 3.0% |
| Mortality | TheGroup's experience | TheGroup's experience |
1) Sales defined as new contracts and extra premiums in existing contracts.
2) The actual outcome of previously signed contracts is compared with previous assumptions and deviations are calculated. Important components are the duration of contracts and cancellations.
3)Acquisition costs are capitalised and amortised according to plan. Certain front end fees are also recorded on the balance sheet and recognized as revenue in the income state ment during several years. The reported change in surplus values is adjusted by the net effect of changes in deferred acquisition costs and front end fees during the period.
4)Assumed investmentreturn (growth in fund values) is 5.0 per cent gross before fees and taxes.Actualreturns results in positive or negative financial effects.
5) Effect of changes in assumptions such as frequency of surrenders,transfers out and assumed expenses.
6) The calculated surplus value is notincluded in the SEBGroup's consolidated accounts. The surplus value is net of capitalised acquisition costs and deferred front end fees.
SUMMARISEDFINANCIAL INFORMATION FORGAMLALIVFÖRSÄKRINGSBOLAGET SEB TRYGGLIV*
| Income statement, condensed | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Life insurance technicalresult | 8,142 | 8,384 |
| Other costs and appropriations | 60 | |
| Taxes | –194 | –210 |
| NETRESULT | 8,008 | 8,174 |
| Balance sheet, condensed | ||
| Total assets | 181,308 | 179,769 |
| TOTALASSETS | 181,308 | 179,769 |
| Total liabilities | 87,359 | 87,666 |
| Consolidation fund / equity | 93,825 | 91,919 |
| Untaxed reserves | 124 | 184 |
TOTAL LIABILITIESANDEQUITY 181,308 179,769
* SEB owns all shares ofGamla Livförsäkringsbolaget SEB Trygg Liv exceptfor a golden share owned by Trygg-Stiftelsen.Gamla Livförsäkringsbolaget SEB Trygg Liv is not consoli dated as subsidiary oftheGroup, since the ownership of SEB in Gamla Livförsäkringsbolaget SEB Trygg Liv does notresultin control. Current yearfigures are unaudited.
47 Assets in unit-linked operations
Within the unit-linked business SEB holds,forits customers' account, a share
of more than 50 per centin 26 (23) funds, where SEB is the investment man- ager. The total value ofthose funds amounted to SEK 129,759m (104,003) of which SEB,forits customers' account, holds SEK 90,167m (74,944).
48 Non-current assets and disposal groups classified as held for sale
| Group | ||
|---|---|---|
| Non-current assets and disposal groups classified as held for sale | 2017 | 2016 |
| Financial assets atfair value through profit orloss Other assets |
175,506 8,505 |
587 |
| TOTAL | 184,011 | 587 |
Liabilities of disposal groups classified as held for sale
| TOTAL | 178,710 | |
|---|---|---|
| Otherliabilities | 10,553 | |
| Financial liabilities atfair value through profit orloss | 34,469 | |
| Liabilities to policyholders | 133,688 |
As announced on 14 December 2017, SEB has signed an agreementto sell all shares in SEB Pensionsforsikring A/S and SEB Administration A/S (SEB Pen sion) to Danica Pension Livsforsikringsaktieselskab (Danica, a subsidiary to Danske Bank). SEB Pension consists of a portfolio oflife and pension con tracts and approximately 275 employees. At year-end, assets under management by SEB Pension amounted to DKK 101bn, and the net profit contributed was DKK 490m forthe year. The completion ofthe sale is among otherthings conditional upon regulatory approvals and certain preparations for separation and is currently expected to occur around the summer of 2018. In the
consolidated balance sheet, assets and liabilities relating to SEB Pension are separated from other assets and liabilities. SEB Pension is reported in the Life & Investment Management division.
The Baltic division has a divestment plan forinvestment properties. Through the continuation ofthe plan, additional properties were reclassified as assets held for sale untilthe derecognition at concluded sales agreement. The impairmentloss recognised in association with the reclassifications amounted to SEK 205m (200).
49 Items affecting comparability
| Group | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2016 | |
| Otherincome | 494 | 520 |
| Total operating income | 494 | 520 |
| Staff costs Other expenses Depreciation, amortisation and impairment oftangible and intangible assets |
–1,320 –92 –978 |
–140 –84 –5,725 |
| Total operating expenses | –2,390 | –5,949 |
| Items affecting comparability | –1,896 | –5,429 |
| Income tax on items affecting comparability | 215 | 77 |
| Items affecting comparability aftertax | –1,681 | –5,352 |
Items affecting comparability 2017
The total expense in the income statementfrom Items affecting comparability was SEK 1,896m before tax and SEK 1,681m aftertax. In total,the items affecting comparability, including the effect on other comprehensive income of SEK 494m, decreased equity by SEK 2,175m.
Visa Sweden
The settlement ofthe acquisition of Visa Europe by Visa Inc. consisted of a combination of cash and shares to be paid to the different Visa Europe mem bers. In Sweden, SEB was an indirect member. A dividend of SEK 494m was received. There was no tax effect. The holdings in Visa have been classified as Available-for-sale asset where the change in value is recognised in Other comprehensive income. The dividend received has reduced the amountin Other comprehensive income by SEK 494m.
SEB's German business
In line with previous communication,the operations in Germany were trans formed and the core business was transferred from SEB AG to the German branch ofthe parent company, Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB, as per 2 January 2018. The purpose ofthe change is to simplify the reporting and administration ofthe German operations. The non-core business that was nottransferred to the branch from SEB AG will be dismantled overtime. The provisions related to redundancy and excess premises amounting to a total of SEK 521m were recognised in 2017. In addition, SEB entered into an agreementto transferthe pension obligations underthe defined benefit plan in SEB AG to Versicherungsverein des Bankgewerbes a.G (BVV) at a total cost of SEK 891m. The transfer willtake place in the second quarter 2018.
Impairment and derecognition of IT assets
An impairment and a derecognition ofintangible IT assets led to an expense in an amount of SEK 978m. The positive tax effect was SEK 215m.
Items affecting comparability 2016
The total effect ofItems affecting comparability in 2016 was a costin the amount of SEK 5,429m before tax and SEK 5,352m aftertax.
Visa Baltic
The settlement ofthe transaction of SEB's Baltic holdings in Visa Europe resulted in a gain of SEK 520m. The gain generated a tax expense of SEK 24m.
Reorganisation and restructuring
SEB implemented a new customer-oriented organisation which resulted in an impairment of goodwill in the amount of SEK 5,334m. This expense was not tax deductible. There were financial effects from restructuring activities in the Baltic and German businesses as well as an impairment and derecognition ofintangible IT assets no longerin use. The total amount was SEK 615m and there was a positive tax effect amounting to SEK 101m.
The SEB Group
Income Statement
| SEKm | 2017 | 20162) | 20151) 2) | 20141) 2) | 20131) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Netinterestincome Netfee and commission income Netfinancial income Net otherincome |
19,893 17,725 6,880 1,112 |
18,738 16,628 7,056 829 |
19,020 18,345 6,298 1,002 |
19,943 17,547 4,473 1,549 |
18,827 15,835 5,581 840 |
| Total operating income | 45,609 | 43,251 | 44,665 | 43,512 | 41,083 |
| Staff costs Other expenses Depreciation, amortisation and impairment oftangible and intangible assets |
–14,025 –6,947 –964 |
–14,422 –6,619 –771 |
–14,436 –6,355 –1,011 |
–13,760 –6,815 –1,129 |
–14,029 –6,720 –1,068 |
| Total operating expenses | –21,936 | –21,812 | –21,802 | –21,704 | –21,817 |
| Gains less losses on disposals oftangible and intangible assets Net creditlosses |
–162 –808 |
–150 –993 |
–213 –883 |
–121 –1,324 |
16 –1,155 |
| Operating profit before items affecting comparability | 22,702 | 20,296 | 21,767 | 20,363 | 18,127 |
| Items affecting comparability | –1,896 | –5,429 | –902 | 2,985 | |
| Operating profit | 20,806 | 14,867 | 20,865 | 23,348 | 18,127 |
| Income tax expense | –4,562 | –4,249 | –4,284 | –4,129 | –3,338 |
| Net profitfrom continuing operations | 16,244 | 10,618 | 16,581 | 19,219 | 14,789 |
| Discontinued operations | –11 | ||||
| NET PROFIT | 16,244 | 10,618 | 16,581 | 19,219 | 14,778 |
| Attributable to minority interests Attributable to equity holders |
16,244 | 10,618 | 16,581 | 1 19,218 |
7 14,771 |
1) Comparable figures for 2015 and 2014 restated and comparable figures for 2013 recalculated pro forma in line with changed reporting oflife insurance business. 2) Items affecting comparability restated, see note 49.
Balance sheet
| SEKm | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash and cash balances and loans to central banks | 190,000 | 217,808 | 133,651 | 119,915 | 183,611 |
| Loans to creditinstitutions | 34,715 | 50,527 | 58,542 | 90,945 | 102,623 |
| Loans to the public | 1,484,803 | 1,453,019 | 1,353,386 | 1,355,680 | 1,302,568 |
| Otherfinancial assets | 635,871 | 857,758 | 899,867 | 1,024,466 | 845,788 |
| Other assets | 214,208 | 41,534 | 50,518 | 50,240 | 50,244 |
| TOTALASSETS | 2,559,596 | 2,620,646 | 2,495,964 | 2,641,246 | 2,484,834 |
| Deposits from central banks and creditinstitutions | 89,076 | 119,864 | 118,506 | 115,186 | 176,191 |
| Deposits and borrowing from the public | 1,004,721 | 962,028 | 883,785 | 943,114 | 849,475 |
| Otherfinancial liabilities | 1,092,981 | 1,260,785 | 1,215,838 | 1,303,584 | 1,204,991 |
| Otherliabilities | 228,892 | 136,993 | 135,037 | 144,786 | 131,363 |
| Total equity | 143,925 | 140,976 | 142,798 | 134,576 | 122,814 |
| TOTAL LIABILITIESANDEQUITY | 2,559,596 | 2,620,646 | 2,495,964 | 2,641,246 | 2,484,834 |
Key figures
| 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on equity, % | 11.53 | 7.80 | 12.24 | 15.25 | 13.11 |
| Return on equity excluding items affecting comparability, % | 12.67 | 11.30 | 12.85 | 13.07 | 13.11 |
| Basic earnings per share, SEK | 7.49 | 4.88 | 7.57 | 8.79 | 6.74 |
| Cost/Income ratio | 0.48 | 0.50 | 0.49 | 0.50 | 0.53 |
| Creditloss level, % | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.09 |
| Totalreserve ratio forindividually impaired loans, % | 55.1 | 68.8 | 68.3 | 62.2 | 86.9 |
| Gross level ofimpaired loans, % | 0.39 | 0.33 | 0.35 | 0.49 | 0.35 |
| Common Equity Tier 1 capitalratio1), % | 19.4 | 18.8 | 18.8 | 16.3 | 15.0 |
| Tier 1 capitalratio1), % | 21.6 | 21.2 | 21.3 | 19.5 | 17.1 |
| Total capitalratio1), % | 24.2 | 24.8 | 23.8 | 22.2 | 18.1 |
1) Basel III.
Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken
Income Statement
| SEKm | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Netinterestincome Netfee and commission income Netfinancial income Otherincome |
20,017 9,557 4,493 8,323 |
19,242 8,843 4,642 7,398 |
19,488 9,200 3,428 9,165 |
19,783 9,235 2,121 5,089 |
18,872 8,283 3,547 6,838 |
| Total operating income | 42,390 | 40,125 | 41,281 | 36,228 | 37,540 |
| Administrative expenses Depreciation, amortisation and impairment |
–14,252 | –15,039 | –13,458 | –13,909 | –14,062 |
| oftangible and intangible assets | –6,377 | –5,775 | –5,447 | –5,157 | –5,024 |
| Total operating costs | –20,629 | –20,814 | –18,905 | –19,066 | –19,086 |
| Profit before creditlosses | 21,761 | 19,311 | 22,376 | 17,162 | 18,454 |
| Net creditlosses Impairment offinancial assets |
–749 –1,497 |
–789 –3,841 |
–520 –775 |
–1,065 –2,721 |
–451 –1,691 |
| Operating profit | 19,515 | 14,681 | 21,081 | 13,376 | 16,312 |
| Appropriations including pension compensation Taxes |
1,885 –3,590 |
2,437 –2,740 |
781 –3,817 |
966 –2,053 |
3,432 –2,805 |
| NET PROFIT | 17,811 | 14,378 | 18,045 | 12,289 | 16,939 |
Balance sheet
| SEKm | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash and cash balances with central banks | 97,741 | 70,671 | 55,712 | 59,170 | 135,309 |
| Loans to creditinstitutions | 192,591 | 287,059 | 166,267 | 194,285 | 183,312 |
| Loans to the public | 1,196,824 | 1,172,095 | 1,080,438 | 1,056,807 | 1,013,188 |
| Otherfinancial assets | 359,162 | 422,305 | 516,708 | 623,920 | 523,970 |
| Other assets | 45,845 | 47,714 | 47,480 | 51,960 | 48,379 |
| TOTALASSETS | 1,892,163 | 1,999,844 | 1,866,605 | 1,986,142 | 1,904,158 |
| Deposits from central banks and creditinstitutions | 127,539 | 168,852 | 134,816 | 144,776 | 210,237 |
| Deposits and borrowing from the public | 822,151 | 782,584 | 690,301 | 706,452 | 611,234 |
| Otherfinancial liabilities | 804,683 | 915,450 | 905,621 | 1,002,762 | 958,231 |
| Otherliabilities | 11,599 | 9,823 | 14,621 | 17,587 | 17,006 |
| Shareholders' equity and untaxed reserves | 126,191 | 123,135 | 121,246 | 114,565 | 107,450 |
| TOTAL LIABILITIES,UNTAXEDRESERVESANDSHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | 1,892,163 | 1,999,844 | 1,866,605 | 1,986,142 | 1,904,158 |
Key figures
| 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on equity, % | 16.3 | 12.6 | 16.5 | 11.8 | 17.7 |
| Cost/Income ratio | 0.49 | 0.52 | 0.46 | 0.53 | 0.51 |
| Creditloss level, % | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.09 | 0.04 |
| Gross level ofimpaired loans, % | 0.33 | 0.22 | 0.17 | 0.31 | 0.08 |
| Common Equity Tier 1 capitalratio1), % | 19.8 | 18.8 | 19.2 | 16.2 | 16.3 |
| Tier 1 capitalratio1), % | 22.5 | 21.7 | 22.1 | 20.0 | 18.9 |
| Total capitalratio1), % | 25.5 | 26.1 | 25.0 | 23.1 | 20.0 |
1) Basel III.
Proposalforthe distribution of profit
Standing atthe disposal oftheAnnual GeneralMeeting in accordance with the balance sheet of Skandinaviska Enskilda BankenAB:
The Board proposes that,following approval ofthe balance sheet of Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB forthe financial year 2017,the Annual General Meeting should distribute the earnings as follows:
| 1) Total |
69,395,006,172 | Total | 69,395,006,172 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net profitforthe year | 17,811,025,076 | – retained earnings | 56,778,518,310 |
| Retained earnings | 50,108,021,770 | To be carried forward to: | |
| Otherreserves | 1,475,959,326 | per Class C share | 138,876,921 |
| SEK | – SEK 5.75 | ||
| per Class A share | 12,477,610,941 | ||
| – SEK 5.75 | |||
| Dividend to shareholders: | |||
| SEK |
Itis the assessment ofthe Board of Directors thatthe proposed dividend is justifiable considering the demands which are imposed by the nature, scope, and risks associated with the business and the size ofthe Parent company's and theGroup's equity and need for consolida tion, liquidity and financial position in general.
1) The Parent Company's equity would have been SEK 10,385m lowerif assets and liabilities had not been measured atfair value in accordance with Chapter 4, Section 14 ofthe Swedish Annual Accounts Act.
Signatures ofthe Board of Directors and the President
The Board of Directors and the President declare thatthe consoli dated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRS as adopted by the EU and give a relevant and faithful representation ofthe Group's financial position and results of operations.
The financial statements ofthe Parent Company have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in Sweden and give a true and fair view ofthe Parent Company's financial position and results of operations.
The Report ofthe Directors forthe Group and the Parent company provides a fairreview ofthe development ofthe Group's and the Parent company's operations,financial position and results of operations and describes materialrisks and uncertainties facing the Parent company and companies included in the Group.
Stockholm 20 February 2018
Marcus Wallenberg Chairman
Sven Nyman Vice Chairman
Samir Brikho Director Winnie Fok
SaraÖhrvall Director Anna-Karin Glimström
Jesper Ovesen Vice Chairman
JohanH.Andresen
Director Signhild Arnegård Hansen Director
Director Tomas Nicolin Director Helena Saxon Director
Håkan Westerberg Director Appointed by the employees
Appointed by the employees
Director
Johan Torgeby
President and Chief Executive Officer Director
Auditor's report
To the general meeting of the shareholders of Skandinaviska Enskilda BankenAB (publ), Corporate Identity Number 502032-9081
Report on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts
Opinions
We have audited the annual accounts and consolidated accounts of Skandinaviska Enskilda BankenAB (SEB) forthe year2017with the exception ofthe sustainability report on pages 67–71. The annual accounts and consolidated accounts ofthe company are included on pages32–166 in this document.
Inouropinion,theannualaccountshavebeenpreparedinaccordancewiththeAnnualAccountsActforCreditInstitutionsandSecuritiesCompaniesandpresentfairly, inallmaterialrespects,thefinan cialpositionofparent companyasof31December2017andits finan cialperformanceandcashflowfortheyearthenendedinaccordancewiththeAnnualAccountsActforCreditInstitutionsandSecuritiesCompanies.Theconsolidatedaccountshavebeenpreparedin accordancewiththeAnnualAccountsActforCreditInstitutionsand SecuritiesCompaniesandpresentfairly, inallmaterialrespects,the financialpositionofthegroupasof31December2017andtheir financialperformanceandcashflowfortheyearthenendedin accordancewithInternationalFinancialReportingStandards (IFRS), asadoptedbytheEU,andtheAnnualAccountsActforCreditInstitu tionsandSecuritiesCompanies.
Acorporate governance report has been prepared. The report ofthe directors and the corporate governance report are consist entwith the other parts ofthe annual accounts and consolidated accounts and the annual accounts actfor CreditInstitutions and Securities Companies.
We therefore recommend thatthe generalmeeting of share holders adopts the income statement and balance sheetforthe parent company and the group.
Our opinions in this report on the annual accounts and the con solidated accounts are consistentwith the content ofthe supple menting reportthat has been presented to the audit committee ofthe Board ofDirectors in accordancewith the auditregulation (537/2014) article 11.
Basis for Opinions
We conducted our auditin accordancewith International Standards onAuditing (ISA) and generally accepted auditing standards in Sweden.Ourresponsibilities underthose standards are further described in theAuditor'sResponsibilities section. We are independent ofthe parent company and the group in accordancewith professional ethics for accountants in Sweden and have otherwise fulfilled our ethicalresponsibilities in accordancewith these requirements.
This includes that, based on the best of our knowledge and belief, no prohibited services referred to in the auditregulation (537/2014) Article 5.1 have been provided to the audited com pany or, where applicable, its parent company orits controlled companies within the EU.
We believe thatthe audit evidencewe have obtained is suffi cient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinions.
Our audit approach
Audit scope
We designed our audit by determiningmateriality and assessing the risks ofmaterialmisstatementin the consolidated financial state ments. In particular,we consideredwhere theManagingDirector and theBoard ofDirectorsmade subjective judgements;for example, in respect of significant accounting estimates thatinvolved making assumptions and considering future events that are inher ently uncertain.As in all of our audits,we also addressed the risk of management override ofinternal controls, including among other
matters consideration ofwhethertherewas evidence of bias that represented a risk ofmaterialmisstatement due to fraud.
We tailored the scope of our auditin orderto perform sufficient work to enable us to provide an opinion on the consolidated finan cial statements as a whole,taking into accountthe structure of the Group,the accounting processes and controls, and the indus try in which the group operates.
TheSEBgrouphas centralizedservice centers, systemsandpro cesses andhas a centralizedfinancefunction foritsSwedishentities andbranches intheNordic countriesandtheUK.Wehaveorganized the auditworkbyhavingour central auditteamto carry outthe testing of all centralizedsystemsandprocessesandthe localaudit teams to carry outadditionaltestingbasedon ourinstructions.
Full scope audit and reporting is performed at entitieswith high significance and risk to the group. The auditis carried outin accordancewith International Standards onAudit and local auditrequire ments. The procedures applied generally include an assessment and testing of controls over key business processes, analytical pro cedures ofindividual account balances,tests of accounting records through inspection, observation or confirmation, and obtaining corroborating evidentialmatterin response to inquiries.
For someentities, even thoughnot consideredto have highsignifi cance orrisk, itis requiredfroma groupauditperspectivetoobtain assurance oncertain accountingareas.Inthese cases, localaudit teamsare instructedtoperformcertainproceduresandreportback tous.Theprocedures appliedgenerally include adetailedanalytical review,reconciliation to underlying sub-ledgers, substantivetesting for specificprocesses, areas andaccounts,discussionwithmanagementregardingaccounting,tax andinternal control aswell as follow-upson known issues frompreviousperiods.
As part of our auditwe place reliance on internal controls forthe applications/systems and related platforms that supports SEB's accounting and financialreporting. Therefore,we performaudit procedures to determine that systems and processes are designed, maintained, operated and kept secure in such away as to provide assurance thatthe risk of errorisminimized. The audit procedures includewalk-throughs of processes and evaluation of design and test of effectiveness of controls. Substantive testing has also been performed.Where possiblewe have relied onmanagement's own evaluation activities and audits performed by SEBInternalAudit.
Our auditis carried out continuously during the yearwith special attention at each quarter end. In connectionwith the SEB group's issuance ofinterimreports,we report our observations to the Audit Committee ofthe Board ofDirectors and issue interimreview reports.Atthe end ofthe year,we also report ourmain observa tions to the full Board ofDirectors.
Materiality
The scope of our auditwas influenced by our application ofmateriality.An auditis designed to obtain reasonable assurancewhether the financial statements are free frommaterialmisstatement. Misstatementsmay arise due to fraud or error. They are consideredmaterial ifindividually orin aggregate,they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis ofthe financial statements.
Based on our professional judgement,we determined certain quantitative thresholds formateriality, including the overallmateriality forthe financial statements as awhole. These,togetherwith qualitative considerations, helped us to determine the scope of our audit and the nature,timing and extent of our audit procedures and to evaluate the effect ofmisstatements, both individually and in aggregate on the financial statements as awhole.
Key auditmatters
Key auditmatters ofthe audit are thosematters that, in our profes sional judgment,were ofmost significance in our audit ofthe annual accounts and consolidated accounts ofthe current period. These matterswereaddressedinthecontextofourauditof,andinforming ouropinionthereon,theannualaccountsandconsolidatedaccounts asawhole,butwedonotprovideaseparateopiniononthesematters.
Key audit matter
Impairment of loans to customers
Accounting forimpairment ofloans to customers requires subjec tive judgement over both timing ofrecognition ofimpairment and the size of any such impairment.
SEB makes provisions forincurred creditlosses on individually assessed loans and for portfolio assessed loans. Loans to corpo rate,real estate and institutional counterparties are primarily individually assessed and specific provisions are made foridentified impaired loans (individually assessed impaired loans). Loans that have not been deemed to be impaired on an individual basis and which have similar creditrisk characteristics are grouped together and assessed collectively forimpairment. Valuations ofloans to private individuals and small businesses are to a large extent made on a portfolio basis (portfolio assessed loans).
Referto the Annual ReportNote 17a – Creditrisk andNote 19 – Loans.
How our audit addressed the Key audit matter
Our audit included a combination of testing of internal controls over financialreporting and substantive testing. The testing of internal controls included procedures relating to the governance structure, segregation of duties and key controls in the lending processes. Substantive testing was made of a sample of provisioning models used, larger credits and higherrisk portfolios. In 2017, we had a special focus on loans to customers in the oil, gas and offshore industries. We also reviewed SEB's back testing of collective provisions.
Based on our work, we had no material observations for the overall audit on the level of loan loss provisions as at 31 December 2017.
Key audit matter
Valuation of financial instruments held at fair value
The valuation offinancial instruments held atfair value was an area of auditfocus due to their significance in presenting both financial position and performance.
Determining fair value offinancial instruments is inherently complex as many instruments are complex and as risks and mar ket prices are ever changing. For some instruments there is also limited availability of observable prices orrates. Because of these factors,the valuation of some instruments involves signifi cant managementjudgment.
The majority of SEB's assets and liabilities measured atfair value are held for clientfacilitation, liquidity or hedging purposes. Between 92-93% ofthe positions are fair valued based on observable prices orrates traded in active markets. The remaining 7-8% ofthe positions are valued based on models and are mainly venture capital holdings and certain derivatives held for hedging purposes.
Referto the Annual ReportNote 21 – Fair value measurement of assets and liabilities,Note 22 – Financial assets at fair value through profit orloss,Note 23 – Available-for-sale financial assets,Note 24 – Investments in associates,Note 31 – Financial Liabilities at fair value through profit orloss.
How our audit addressed the Key audit matter
In our audit, we assessed the design and tested the operating effec tiveness of key controls supporting the identification, measurement and oversight of valuation risk of financial instruments.
In addition to test appropriate segregation of duties, we exam ined SEB's independent price verification process, model validation and approval processes, controls over data feeds and valuation inputs as well as SEB's governance and reporting processes and
controls. We paid particular attention to controls relating to com plex instruments.
For valuations dependent on unobservable inputs or which involved a higher degree of judgement for otherreasons, we used our valuation specialists to evaluate the assumptions, methodolo gies and models used by SEB. We performed independent valua tions of a sample of positions.
Based on our work, we had no material observations forthe over all audit on the valuation of financial instruments held at market value as at 31 December 2017.
Key audit matter
IFRS 9 disclosures
IFRS 9,the new accounting standard forfinancial instruments came into effect on 1 January 2018. The standard replaces the currentIAS 39 standard. SEB presentthe financial effects ofthe new standard in Accordance with IAS 8.
The new standard has significant effects on SEB's opening balance for 2018, which is presented in disclosures to the annual reportfor 2017.
The two main areas affecting SEB are:
- Classification and measurement: How differenttypes offinan cial instruments are to be classified and measured and accounted for. Valuation and accounting is determined based on the underlying business model.
- Impairment: The methodology forloan loss provisioning. The new modelrequires companies to use forward looking information in an expected loss model instead ofthe currently used incurred loss model.
- Referto the Annual ReportNote 1 –Note about IFRS 9.
How our audit addressed the Key audit matter
We have audited the disclosures made related to the financial effects and the transition from IAS 39 to IFRS 9. We have also audited overall governing documents and the overall governance in SEB to ensure adherence to IFRS 9.
For Classification and measurement, we have examined SEB's business model assessments for a large number of contracts to validate the classifications made are in accordance with IFRS 9.
ForImpairment, we have reviewed definitions made, data sources used and the overall mechanics of the impairment models used and validated adherence to IFRS 9. We have also tested a sample of impairment models to ensure that the model calculator is working as described in the model documentation. The sample selected was risk based addressing either significant volumes or complex products.
Based on our work, we had no material observations forthe overall audit on the disclosures of the IFRS 9 implementation in accordance with IAS 8 as at 31 December 2017
Key audit matter
Provision for uncertain tax positions
SEB is subjectto taxation in many jurisdictions and, in many cases,the finaltax treatmentis uncertain and not determined untilresolved with the relevanttax authority. Consequently, SEB makes judgements aboutthe probability and amount oftax liabilities which are subjectto assessments by tax authorities and potentially associated with legal processes.
Additionally,tax legislation is under significant and rapid change which when becoming effective affect both current period tax costs and the valuation oftax assets.
Referto theAnnual ReportNote 15 – Taxes andNote 32 – Otherliabilities.
How our audit addressed the Key audit matter
In our audit of tax costs and valuation of tax assets and liabilities, we have tested internal controls and performed substantive testing. The testing of internal controls included procedures relating to the governance structure, segregation of duties and key controls in the tax process.
In the substantive testing we have used ourtax specialists to examine potential implications of ongoing tax audits and legal processes. We have followed correspondence with tax authorities and opinions SEB received from its external legal advisers. We have also independently examined the matters in dispute and the provi sions made by SEB.
Based on our work, we had no material observations forthe overall audit on the level of provisions for uncertain tax positions as at 31 December 2017.
Other Information than the annual accounts and consolidated accounts
This document also contains otherinformation than the annual accounts and consolidated accounts and is found on pages 1–31. The Board of Directors and the Managing Director are responsible forthis otherinformation.
Our opinion on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts does not coverthis otherinformation and we do not express any form of assurance conclusion regarding this otherinformation.
In connection with our audit of the annual accounts and con solidated accounts, our responsibility is to read the informa tion identified above and consider whether the information is materially inconsistent with the annual accounts and consoli dated accounts. In this procedure we also take into account our knowledge otherwise obtained in the audit and assess whether the information otherwise appears to be materially misstated.
If we, based on the work performed concerning this informa tion, conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.
Responsibilities of the Board of Directors and the Managing Director
The Board of Directors and the Managing Director are responsible forthe preparation of the annual accounts and consolidated accounts and that they give a fair presentation in accordance with the Annual Accounts Act for Credit Institutions and Securities Companies and, concerning the consolidated accounts, in accordance with IFRS as adopted by the EU and the Annual Accounts Act for Credit Institutions and Securities Companies. The Board of Directors and the Managing Director are also responsible for such internal control as they determine is neces sary to enable the preparation of annual accounts and consoli dated accounts that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the annual accounts and consolidated accounts, The Board of Directors and the Managing Director are responsible forthe assessment ofthe company's and the group's ability to continue as a going concern. They disclose, as applicable, mat ters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting. The going concern basis of accounting is however not applied ifthe Board of Directors and the Managing Director intends to liquidate the company,to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative butto do so.
The Audit Committee shall, without prejudice to the Board of Director's responsibilities and tasks in general, among other things oversee the company's financialreporting process.
Auditor's responsibility
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the annual accounts and consolidated accounts as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor's report that includes our opinions. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs and generally accepted auditing standards in Sweden will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasona bly be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these annual accounts and consolidated accounts.
A further description of ourresponsibility forthe audit of the annual accounts and consolidated accounts is available on Revisorsinspektionen's website: revisorsinspektionen.se/rn/ showdocument/documents/rev_dok/revisors_ansvar.pdf This description is part ofthe auditor's report.
Report on otherlegal and regulatory requirements Opinions
In addition to our audit of the annual accounts and consolidated accounts, we have also audited the administration of the Board of Directors and the Managing Director of Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (publ) forthe year 2017 and the proposed appropriations of the company's profit orloss.
We recommend to the general meeting of shareholders that the profit be appropriated in accordance with the proposal in the statutory administration report and that the members of the Board of Directors and the Managing Director be discharged from liability forthe financial year.
Basis for Opinions
We conducted the audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards in Sweden. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor's Responsibilities section. We are independent of the parent company and the group in accordance with professional ethics for accountants in Sweden and have otherwise fulfilled our ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is suffi cient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinions.
Responsibilities of the Board of Directors and the Managing Director
The Board of Directors is responsible forthe proposal for appro priations of the company's profit orloss. At the proposal of a dividend, this includes an assessment of whetherthe dividend is justifiable considering the requirements which the company's and the group's type of operations, size and risks place on the size of the parent company's and the group's equity, consolida tion requirements, liquidity and position in general.
The Board of Directors is responsible for the company's organization and the administration of the company's affairs. This includes among other things continuous assessment of the company's and the group's financial situation and ensuring that the company's organization is designed so that the accounting, management of assets and the company's financial affairs otherwise are controlled in a reassuring manner. The Managing Director shall manage the ongoing administration according to the Board of Directors' guidelines and instructions and among other matters take measures that are necessary to fulfil the company's accounting in accordance with law and handle the management of assets in a reassuring manner.
Auditor's responsibility
Our objective concerning the audit of the administration, and thereby our opinion about discharge from liability, is to obtain audit evidence to assess with a reasonable degree of assurance whether any member of the Board of Directors orthe Managing Directorin any materialrespect:
- has undertaken any action or been guilty of any omission which can give rise to liability to the company, or
- in any other way has acted in contravention of the Companies Act, the Banking and Financing Business Act, the Annual Accounts Act for Credit Institutions and Securities Companies orthe Articles of Association.
Our objective concerning the audit of the proposed appropria tions of the company's profit or loss, and thereby our opinion about this, is to assess with reasonable degree of assurance whether the proposal is in accordance with the Companies Act.
Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards in Sweden will always detect actions or omissions that can give rise to liability to the company, orthat the proposed appropriations of the company's profit or loss are not in accordance with the Companies Act.
A further description of our responsibility for the audit of the administration is available on Revisorsinspektionen's website: revisorsinspektionen.se/rn/showdocument/documents/rev_dok/ revisors_ansvar.pdf
This description is part ofthe auditor's report.
Report on the statutory sustainability report
The Board of Directors is responsible forthe preparation ofthe sustainability reportincluded on pages 67–71 and thatit has been prepared in accordance with the Annual Accounts Act.
Our examination has been conducted in accordance with FAR's auditing standard RevR 12 The auditor's opinion regarding the statutory sustainability report. This means that our examination ofthe statutory sustainability reportis different and substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with International Standards on Auditing and generally accepted auditing standards in Sweden. We believe thatthe examination has provided us with sufficient basis for our opinion.
A sustainability report has been prepared.
PricewaterhouseCoopers AB, was appointed as the auditor of SEB by the annual general meeting 2017, and has been SEB's auditor since 2000.
Stockholm 20 February 2018 PricewaterhouseCoopers AB
Peter Nyllinge Authorized Public Accountant Martin By Authorized Public Accountant
Auditors' limited assurance report on the statutory sustainability report
To the general meeting of the shareholders in Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB, corporate identity number 502032-9081
Introduction
We have been engaged by Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (publ) (SEB) to undertake a limited assurance engagement ofthe statutory sustainability reportforthe year 2017 on pages 67-71.
Responsibilities of the Board
The Board of Directors is responsible forthe preparation of a sustainability reportin accordance with the Annual Accounts Act. This responsibility includes the internal controlrelevantto the preparation of a sustainability reportthatis free from material misstatements, whether due to fraud or error.
Responsibilities of the Auditor
Ourresponsibility is to express a conclusion on the sustainability report based on the procedures we have performed.
We have conducted ourlimited assurance engagementin accordance with ISAE 3000 Assurance Engagements Otherthan Audits or Reviews of Historical Financial Information issued by IAASB. A limited assurance engagement consists of making inquiries, primarily of persons responsible forthe preparation of the sustainability report, and applying analytical and otherlimited assurance procedures.
A limited assurance engagementis different and substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with IAASB's Standards on Auditing and other generally accepted auditing standards in Sweden. The procedures performed consequently
do not enable us to obtain assurance that we would become aware of all significant matters that might be identified in a rea sonable assurance engagement. Accordingly, we do not express a reasonable assurance conclusion.
The auditfirm applies ISQC 1 International Standard on Quality Control and accordingly maintains a comprehensive system of quality control including documented policies and procedures regarding compliance with ethicalrequirements, professional standards and applicable legal and regulatory requirements.
Our procedures are based on the requirements on sustainability reporting in the Annual Accounts Act. We believe thatthe evi dence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our conclusion below.
Conclusion
Based on the limited assurance procedures we have performed, nothing has come to our attention that causes us to believe that the sustainability reportis not prepared, in all materialrespects, in accordance with the criteria in the Annual Accounts Act.
Stockholm, 20 February 2018 PricewaterhouseCoopers AB
Peter Nyllinge Authorized Public Accountant Fredrik Ljungdahl
Expert Member of FAR
Definitions
Alternative Performance Measures 1)
Items affecting comparability
TofacilitatethecomparisonofSEB'soperatingprofitbetween currentandpreviousperiods, itemswithsignificantimpactthat management considersaffectthecomparabilityorarerelevantfor theunderstandingofthefinancialresult,areidentifiedandseparatelydescribed,e.g. impairmentofgoodwill,restructuring,netprofit fromdivestmentsandotherincomeor costs thatarenotrecurring.
Operating profit
Total profit before tax.
Operating profit before items affecting comparability
Total profit before items affecting comparability and tax.
Return on equity
Net profit attributable to shareholders in relation to average 2) shareholders' equity.
Return on equity excluding items affecting comparability
Net profit attributable to shareholders, excluding items effecting comparability and theirrelated tax effect, in relation to average 2) shareholders' equity.
Return on business equity
Operating profit by division,reduced by a standard tax rate, in relation to the divisions' average 2) business equity (allocated capital).
Return on total assets
Net profit attributable to shareholders, in relation to average 2) total assets.
Return on risk exposure amount
Net profit attributable to shareholders in relation to average 2) risk exposure amount.
Cost/income ratio
Total operating expenses in relation to total operating income.
Basic earnings per share
Net profit attributable to shareholders in relation to the weighted average3) number of shares outstanding before dilution.
Diluted earnings per share
Net profit attributable to shareholders in relation to the weighted average3) diluted number of shares. The calculated dilution is based on the estimated economic value ofthe long-term equity-based programmes.
Net worth per share
The sum of shareholders' equity and the equity portion of any surplus values in the holdings ofinterest-bearing securities and the surplus value in life insurance operations in relation to the total number of outstanding shares.
Equity per share
Shareholders' equity in relation to the number of shares outstanding.
Credit loss level
Net creditlosses in relation to the sum ofthe opening balances ofloans to the public, loans to creditinstitutions and loan guarantees less specific, collective and off balance sheetreserves.
Gross level of impaired loans
Individually assessed impaired loans, gross, in relation to the sum ofloans to the public and loans to creditinstitutions before reduction ofreserves.
Net level of impaired loans
Individually assessed impaired loans, net (less specific reserves), in relation to the sum of netloans to the public and loans to credit institutions less specific reserves and collective reserves.
Specific reserve ratio forindividually assessed impaired loans
Specific reserves in relation to individually assessed impaired loans.
Totalreserve ratio forindividually assessed impaired loans
Totalreserves (specific reserves and collective reserves for individually assessed impaired loans) in relation to individually assessed impaired loans.
Reserve ratio for portfolio assessed loans
Collective reserves for portfolio assessed loans in relation to portfolio assessed loans past due more than 60 days or restructured loans.
Non-performing loans (NPL)
SEB's term forloans that are eitherimpaired or not performing according to the loan contract. Includes individually assessed impaired loans, portfolio assessed loans, past due more than 60 days and restructured portfolio assessed loans .
NPL coverage ratio
Totalreserves (specific, collective and off balance sheet reserves) in relation to non-performing loans.
NPL per cent of lending
Non-performing loans in relation to the sum ofloans to the public and loans to creditinstitutions before reduction ofreserves.
See sebgroup.com/irforthe excel file entitled Alternative Performance Measures which includes information on the calculation of alternative performance measures.
1) Alternative Performance Measures, APMs, are financial measures of historical orfuture financial performance,financial position, or cash flows, otherthan those defined in the applicable financialreporting framework (IFRS) orin the EU Capital Requirements Regulation and Directive CRR/CRD IV. APMs are used by SEB when relevantto assess and describe SEB's financial situation and provide additionalrelevantinformation and tools to enable analysis of SEB's performance. APMs on basic earnings per share, diluted earnings per share, net worth per share, equity per share,return on equity,return on total assets and return on risk exposure amount provide relevantinformation on the performance in relation to differentinvestment measurements. The cost/income ratio provides information on SEB's cost efficiency. APMs related to lending provide information on provisions in relation to creditrisk. Allthese measures may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies.
2) Average year-to-date, calculated on month-end figures.
3) Average, calculated on a daily basis.
Definitions
According to the EU Capital Requirements Regulation no 575/2013 (CRR)
Risk exposure amount
Total assets and off balance sheetitems,risk-weighted in accordance with capital adequacy regulations for creditrisk and market risk. The operationalrisks are measured and added as risk exposure amount. Risk exposure amounts are only defined forthe consolidated situation, excluding insurance entities and items deducted from own funds.
Common Equity Tier 1 capital
Shareholders' equity excluding proposed dividend, deferred tax assets, intangible assets and certain otherregulatory adjustments defined in EU Regulation no 575/2013 (CRR).
Tier 1 capital
Common Equity Tier 1 capital plus qualifying forms of subordi nated loans.
Tier 2 capital
Mainly subordinated loans not qualifying as Tier 1 capital contribution.
Own funds
The sum of Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital.
Common Equity Tier 1 capitalratio
Common Equity Tier 1 capital as a percentage ofrisk exposure amount.
Tier 1 capitalratio
Tier 1 capital as a percentage ofrisk exposure amount.
Total capitalratio
Total own funds as a percentage ofrisk exposure amount.
Leverage ratio
Tier 1 capital as a percentage oftotal assets including off balance sheetitems with conversion factors according to the standardised approach.
Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR)
High-quality liquid assets as a percentage ofthe estimated net cash outflows overthe next 30 calendar days.
Calendar
2017 Annual Accounts 31 January 2018 Annual Report 5 March 2018 Annual General Meeting 26 March 2018 Interim report January–March 30 April 2018 Interim report January–June 17 July 2018 Interim report January–September 25 October 2018

Corporate website
Financial information, publications and other information regarding SEB is available at sebgroup.com
Financial information and publications

Annual Report Information on SEB's business, strategy, risk management and corporate governance. Detailed information on SEB's financial position and results. Includes SEB's Sustainability Report.

Annual Review An abbreviated version ofthe Annual Report.

Interim reports and fact books Quarterly reports on SEB's financial performance. Detailed information on SEB's financial position and results in fact books.
SEB Fact Book Annual Accounts 2017
Fact Book Annual Accounts 2017 STOCKHOLM 31 JANUARY 2018

Capital Adequacy and Risk Management Report (Pillar 3) Disclosure on capital adequacy and risk managementin accordance with regulatory requirements.

Sustainability Overview
Annual general infor mation on SEB's sustainability approach and performance.Includes highlights for 2017,the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Index and Fact Book.
New shareholders are automatically offered a subscription ofthe Annual Report orthe Annual Review. Order printed copies ofthe Annual Report and the Annual Review atsebgroup.com/ir Subscribe to a digital version ofthe interim reports and the fact book (pdf) atsebgroup.com/press

Annual General Meeting
The Annual General Meeting will be held on Monday 26 March 2018 at 1 pm (CET) at Stockholm Concert Hall, Hötorget, Stockholm, Sweden.
A notice convening the Annual General Meeting, including an agenda, is available on sebgroup.com
Shareholders who wish to attend the Annual General Meeting shall atthe latest on Tuesday20March 2018:
- be registered in the shareholders'register kept by Euroclear SwedenAB, and
- have notified the bank in either ofthe following ways:
- by telephone 0771 23 18 18 (+46 771 23 18 18 from outside Sweden) between 9 am and 4.30 pm (CET) or
- at sebgroup.com or
- in writing to the following address: Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken c/o Euroclear Sweden, Box 191, 101 23 Stockholm, Sweden
Dividend
The Board proposes a dividend of SEK 5.75 per share for 2017.
Wednesday 28 March 2018, is proposed as record date forthe dividend payments. Ifthe Annual General Meeting resolves in accordance with the proposal,the share will be traded ex-dividend on Tuesday 27 March 2018 and dividend payments are expected to be distributed by Euroclear Sweden AB on Wednesday 4 April 2018.
Head office
Postal address SEB, SE-106 40 Stockholm, Sweden Visiting address Kungsträdgårdsgatan 8, Stockholm, Sweden Telephone +46 771 62 10 00
Contacts
Jan Erik Back 1) Chief Financial Officer Telephone: +46822 19 00 E-mail: [email protected]
Jonas Söderberg 2) Head ofInvestor Relations Telephone: +4687638319 E-mail: [email protected]
Viveka Hirdman-Ryrberg
Head of Group Communications and Group Marketing Telephone: +46 8 763 85 77 E-mail: [email protected]
Malin Schenkenberg Financial Information Officer Telephone: +46 8 763 95 31 E-mail: [email protected]
1) As of 1 May 2018, Masih Yazdi assumes the position of Finance Director (telephone +46 72 023 9458, e-mail: [email protected])
2) As of 1 April 2018 Christoffer Geijer assumes the position of Head ofInvestor Relations (telephone + 46 8 506 23198, e-mail: [email protected])

•
•
•
Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB's corporate registration number: 502032-9081