Annual Report • Nov 10, 2022
Annual Report
Open in ViewerOpens in native device viewer
Schroder Income Growth Fund plc Report and Accounts
For the year ended 31 August 2022

The Company's principal investment objectives are to provide real growth of income, being growth of income in excess of the rate of inflation, and capital growth as a consequence of the rising income.
The investment policy of the Company is to invest primarily in UK equities but up to 20% of the portfolio may be invested in equities listed on recognised stock exchanges outside the UK. If considered appropriate, the Company may use equity related instruments such as convertible securities and up to 10% of the portfolio may be invested in bonds. In addition, up to 20% of total income may be generated by short-dated call options written on holdings in the portfolio. Put options comprising short-term exchange-traded instruments on major stock market indices of an amount up to the value of the Company's borrowings may also be utilised.


| Financial Highlights | 2 |
|---|---|
| 10 Year Financial Record | 3 |
| Chairman's Statement | 4 |
| Manager's Review | 6 |
| Investment Portfolio | 9 |
| Strategic Review | 10 |
| Income Statement | 39 |
|---|---|
| Statement of Changes in Equity | 40 |
| Statement of Financial Position | 41 |
| Notes to the Accounts | 42 |
| Annual General Meeting | |
|---|---|
| Annual General Meeting – Recommendations | 55 |
| Notice of Annual General Meeting | 56 |
| Explanatory Notes to the Notice of Annual General Meeting | 57 |
| Definitions of Terms and Performance Measures | 59 |
| Shareholder Information Inside back cover |
Strategic Report

Some of the financial measures below are classified as Alternative Performance Measures, as defined by the European Securities and Markets Authority and are indicated with an asterisk (*). Definitions of these performance measures, and other terms used in this report, are given on page 59, together with supporting calculations where appropriate.
(Total returns include the impact of dividends paid. Details of the calculations are given on page 59).


Share price total return*

| 31 August 2022 |
31 August 2021 |
% Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shareholders' funds (£'000) | 205,100 | 219,915 | (6.7) |
| NAV per share (pence) | 295.26 | 316.59 | (6.7)2 |
| NAV per share total return* | (2.7) | ||
| Share price (pence) | 289.00 | 316.50 | (8.7)2 |
| Share price total return* | (4.7) | ||
| Share price discount* (%) | 2.1 | 0.0 | |
| Gearing* (%) | 13.5 | 7.9 | |
| Year ended 31 August 2022 |
Year ended 31 August 2021 |
% Change | |
| Net revenue return after taxation (£'000) | 9,697 | 8,370 | 15.9 |
| Revenue return per share (pence) | 13.96 | 12.08 | 15.6 |
| Dividends per share (pence) | 13.2 | 12.8 | 3.1 |
| Consumer Prices Index ("CPI")1 | 121.8 | 112.1 | 8.7 |
Ongoing Charges* (%) 0.74 0.79
1 Source: Office for National Statistics.
2 Does not include any adjustment for dividends paid.
*Alternative performance measures.
| At 31 August | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shareholders' funds (£'000) | 171,616 | 188,936 | 188,165 | 196,490 | 216,718 | 216,740 | 204,458 | 170,324 | 219,915 | 205,100 | |
| NAV per share (pence) | 249.85 | 275.06 | 273.94 | 286.06 | 315.51 | 315.54 | 297.66 | 246.71 | 316.59 | 295.26 | |
| Share price (pence) | 251.25 | 266.50 | 269.75 | 257.00 | 293.63 | 301.00 | 273.00 | 242.00 | 316.50 | 289.00 | |
| Share price premium/ (discount) to NAV per share* (%) |
0.6 | (3.1) | (1.5) | (10.2) | (6.9) | (4.6) | (8.3) | (1.9) | 0.0 | (2.1) | |
| Gearing* (%)1 | 3.3 | 9.6 | 9.5 | 8.4 | 5.8 | 8.3 | 15.5 | 9.5 | 7.9 | 13.5 | |
| For the year ended 31 August |
2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |
| Net revenue return after taxation (£'000) |
7,003 | 7,428 | 7,761 | 8,299 | 9,107 | 8,767 | 9,744 | 8,042 | 8,370 | 9,697 | |
| Revenue return per share (pence) |
10.20 | 10.82 | 11.30 | 12.08 | 13.26 | 12.76 | 14.19 | 11.69 | 12.08 | 13.96 | |
| Dividends per share (pence) | 9.80 | 10.10 | 10.30 | 10.60 | 11.20 | 11.80 | 12.40 | 12.60 | 12.80 | 13.20 | |
| Ongoing charges* (%)2 | 1.00 | 0.93 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.95 | 0.93 | 0.87 | 0.86 | 0.79 | 0.74 | |
| Performance3 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 |
| NAV total return* | 100.0 | 125.2 | 143.1 | 147.8 | 160.3 | 183.1 | 190.5 | 186.9 | 162.2 | 217.9 | 211.7 |
| Share price total return* |
100.0 | 131.4 | 144.8 | 152.2 | 151.0 | 179.4 | 191.9 | 181.5 | 168.8 | 231.3 | 220.4 |
| FTSE All-Share Index total return |
100.0 | 118.9 | 131.2 | 128.1 | 143.1 | 163.7 | 171.3 | 172.1 | 150.3 | 190.8 | 192.7 |
1Borrowings used for investment purposes, less cash, expressed as a percentage of net assets. 2Ongoing charges represents the management fee and all other operating expenses excluding finance costs and transaction costs, expressed as a percentage of the average daily net asset values during the year.
3Source: Morningstar/Thomson Reuters. Rebased to 100 at 31 August 2012.
*Alternative Performance Measures.

Source: Morningstar/Thomson Reuters. Rebased to 100 at 31 August 2012.

Source: Morningstar/Office for National Statistics. Rebased to 100 at 31 August 2012. The Retail Prices Index ("RPI") was used as the measure of inflation up to 31 August 2013 and the Consumer Prices Index ("CPI") thereafter.


I am pleased to report that the Company was able to increase its dividend for the 27th year running. Dividends per share for the year of 13.2p represent a 3.1% increase on the previous year. Given the high and accelerating level of inflation during the year, the Company was unable to increase the dividend in real
terms, however it has continued to fulfil its primary objective of 'real growth of income' above the levels of inflation over the last five and ten years. The income earned by the Company recovered over the last year as companies gradually began to increase their dividends. Earnings per share for the Company increased by 15.6% to 13.96 pence per share.
A transfer of £527,000 will be made to the Company's revenue reserve, allowing £7.96 million to be carried forward, which amounts to 87% of this year's total proposed dividends.
During a volatile period for global equity markets the Company returned -2.7% in NAV and -4.7% in share price terms. This compares to a return of 1.0% for the FTSE All Share Total Return index. The largest detractors to performance during the period were underweights to banks and energy companies which benefitted from rising interest rates and elevated energy prices, respectively. For more details of performance please refer to the Manager's Review.
The Company's share price discount to NAV has averaged 1.1% during the year and ended the year at 2.1%. The Company was not able issue any shares during the period and did not buy back any shares.
As outlined in the last annual report I have reached my nine year tenure on the board and I will be retiring at the forthcoming AGM and not standing for re-election. Following a recommendation from the Nomination Committee, the board has appointed Mr Ewen Cameron Watt as Chairman. He has been a non executive director since 2017 and senior independent director since 2021 and will use his significant experience and expertise to chair the board. We recommend that shareholders vote in favour of his election at the AGM. His biography can be found on page 19.
Following a rigorous selection process using an external search agency, the board is very pleased to have announced the appointment of Ms June Aitken, as a non-executive director, effective from 1 January 2023. June is an experienced
1 As at 9 November 2021
investment trust director who will bring extensive experience and a broad skillset to the board.
Ms Victoria Muir will assume the position of senior independent director following the AGM.
The Company has in place a £32.5 million revolving credit facility with Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation Europe Limited ("SMBC"), expiring on 23 September 2023. The drawdown on the loan facility has averaged £29.0 million during the year and we estimate that this has contributed 1.6p per share to the revenue return, but this was offset by a greater 3.1p per share negative impact on the capital return. As at 7 November 2022, the level of gearing was 11.3%.
The AGM will be held at 12.00 pm on Thursday, 15 December 2022. We encourage shareholders to either cast their votes by proxy, or to attend in person. The AGM will provide an opportunity for shareholders to ask questions of the board and the Manager although, as per previous years, the Manager's presentation will also be posted as a separate webinar in order to make it accessible to a wider number of shareholders many of whom who find coming to London difficult. The Manager's webinar will be broadcast on 24 November 2022 at 3pm, and all shareholders are encouraged to sign up, to hear the fund manager's view, and to ask questions of your Manager. To sign up please visit https://registration.duuzra.com/form/SCFAnnualResults.
In addition, the board would like to invite shareholders to get in touch via the Company Secretary with any questions or comments in advance of the AGM. To email, please use: [email protected] or write to us at the Company's registered office address (Company Secretary, Schroder Income Growth Fund plc, 1 London Wall Place, London EC2Y 5AU).
Unfortunately the headwinds laid out in the Company's interim results have strengthened. A toxic combination of rising inflation, interest rates and squeezed incomes make a global slowdown and UK recession fairly inevitable. Furthermore, heavy losses in fixed income markets have raised the cost of capital for companies.
Central bank policy is seeking to combat inflation risk through slowing monetary growth and, higher interest rates. These are not a great combination for equity investment returns.
At the same time, currency weakness has made the UK equity market ever more attractive as a destination for overseas corporations looking to grow their UK operations through acquisition. This weakness has also helped UK companies with significant overseas profits increase cash flows and dividends when measured in sterling.
Deep fundamental research is vital in identifying companies that can withstand the current headwinds and deliver positive long-term returns to investors. Your manager's long track record of navigating market cycles and the considerable resources it has available should give investors comfort at this time. The continued stewardship of Sue Noffke, which now exceeds a decade of managing the Company's portfolio, should provide investors with further reassurance.
The board will continue to work closely with your Portfolio Manager to deliver the Company's long-term objective of real dividend growth over the long term, as well as capital growth. While this will undoubtedly be difficult in an environment of sustained elevated inflation your board remains confident of achieving this outcome for shareholders in the long-term as the economic environment stabilises. I wish the Company all success in the future.
Bridget Guerin Chairman 9 November 2022

The net asset value per share total return in the 12 months to 31 August 2022 was –2.7%. This compares to 1.0% from the FTSE All Share Total Return Index. The share price total return was –4.7% (source: Schroders/Morningstar).
Revenue after tax for the Company rose 15.9%, which exceeded our earlier expectations. Income benefitted from several factors, including the earnings growth of portfolio holdings and a boost from the strong dollar for international businesses. Nearly all of the holdings generated income in the 12-month period (the exceptions being National Express and newly formed Haleon which demerged from GSK in July) as the impact of the pandemic restrictions eased, enabling companies in the leisure, hospitality and real estate sectors to return to more normal operations.
For the second consecutive year, large payments made by mining holdings BHP Billiton, Rio Tinto and Anglo American were the most significant contributors to portfolio income over the period. Special dividends were again a feature from Rio Tinto and Anglo American but at reduced levels compared to the prior period. Income from Shell increased more than threefold as we built our position over the period, together with a significant 44% increase in dividend payments compared to the prior year when the company cut payments significantly. A diverse range of holdings saw dividend growth in excess of 20%. This included companies where the passing of the pandemic had reopened operations (property businesses student accommodation provider Unite and SME business unit provider Workspace) or enabled management to reduce their cautious approach to payments (construction and infrastructure group Balfour Beatty). Meanwhile, a number of portfolio holdings resumed strong dividends having previously cut them, such as oil and gas giant Shell, Asian life insurance company Prudential and interdealer broker TP ICAP. Other holdings which had significant dividend increases from growth in their businesses included private capital investors 3i, private equity investment firm Intermediate Capital Group, international employment recruiter SThree, pet care business Pets at Home, diversified miner BHP Billiton and payments provider Paypoint. A number of other holdings increased dividend payments by 10% or more, including luxury fashion house Burberry, food retailer Tesco, biopharma company AstraZeneca, speciality chemical business Johnson Matthey, diversified miner Anglo American and power generator Drax. A small number of holdings saw dividend payments fall. These included Bunzl, where the comparison of 2021 was inflated by a catch-up dividend payment from the prior year, GSK, which rebased its dividend payment down after the demerger of Haleon, and Unilever, where the dividend in sterling fell due to Euro weakness against sterling earlier in the period. The remainder of the Company's holdings posted income gains in the range up to 10%.
UK equities were more resilient than many other world markets over this 12-month period, which represented a particularly challenging time for global equities more broadly. Shortages and supply chain issues were an enduring theme as activity bounced back sharply following pandemic lockdowns. This contributed to inflation hitting multi-decade highs in many developed economies, exacerbated by soaring energy and food costs following Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
In response, all the major developed central banks increased interest rates materially, led by the Bank of England. In late 2021 it, became the first of the G7 monetary authorities to hike rates. The US Federal Reserve, however, has taken the most aggressive approach, with a series of large interest rate increases and after making an early start to unwinding quantitative easing (QE) measures, through quantitative tightening (QT).
The prospect of rising interest rates heavily influenced the investor mindset, perhaps best illustrated by a clear preference for large companies capable of returning cash to them today as dividends. The UK's more mature and slower growing banking, oil and tobacco sectors all performed very well, which has helped underpin the valuation of the broader UK equity market. Healthcare was another notable bright spot and dollar strength was a positive for most of these sectors given significant overseas earnings.
In contrast, fears around the impact of rising energy bills on consumer discretionary spending weighed heavily on retailers, travel and leisure, construction and other domestically focused companies. These trends contributed to the marked underperformance of UK small and mid-cap equities versus large caps, to an extent rare in history. This area of the market is also home to many fast-growing companies in new and emerging industries, whose valuations have come under particular pressure amid rising interest rates.
The NAV per share total return underperformed the FTSE All-Share Index total return over the period, with sector allocation the main driver of negative relative returns.
One of the main drivers of underperformance over the period was being underexposed, relative to the index, to the strongly performing oil and banking sectors. The strength of the economic recovery from the Covid-induced recession initially boosted demand for oil and gas producers, while the Russia Ukraine conflict exacerbated prices further. Not owning oil company BP, which strongly outperformed, was detrimental. Bond yields rose as expectations for interest rate rises increased, supporting banks. Subsequently, not owning large Asian-focused bank HSBC notably weighed on relative performance, albeit that our position in another Asian bank, Standard Chartered, which also performed strongly, partly mitigated this. Not holding tobacco stocks, such as British American Tobacco, whose defensive characteristics were rewarded, also weighed on performance.
Other notable detractors included our large holding in Pets at Home, one of the portfolio's top performers over the prior financial year, which suffered from a derating in its shares despite continued, strong operational delivery. Concern that the stock was a "Covid winner", which would struggle to sustain growth levels, was exacerbated by the announcement of senior management changes. We remain optimistic about the company's longer term prospects given the strong track record of growth in its retail business and significant opportunity for its vets practice division. Household spending
on pets has also shown resilience in prior recessions which adds to our confidence in the holding given the current squeeze on household incomes.
Our decision to invest in betting and gaming group company 888 has proved costly over the past year. Share price weakness has been acute as the market has focused on the extent and cost of the debt associated with the group's acquisition of William Hill's UK assets. We believe the deal has strategic merit as it diversifies the business by geography and product, with scope for cost savings and the potential for revenue synergies as cross-selling opportunities exist between gaming (888) and sports (William Hill).
On the positive side, our position in power generation company Drax performed strongly. Drax has switched its focus from coal to biomass renewable fuels and has longerterm attractions of the potential to deploy carbon capture and storage technology to become a leading carbon negative energy business.
Our longstanding position in education content provider Pearson contributed to performance as, under the new CEO, strategy was better articulated and executed. Meanwhile, defence services business QinetiQ experienced share price volatility during the 12-month period. The shares fell sharply in the autumn of 2021, due to disclosure of an uncharacteristic problem contract that emanated from supply chain issues. Following engagement with the company, we believed that the negative sentiment and share price reaction was overdone and we added to our position. The subsequent share price recovery on a larger holding generated a positive impact. Lastly, not holding closed-ended investment vehicles, such as Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust, was also a positive.
| Security | weight (%)1 |
Weight Portfolio relative to index (%)1 |
Relative perfor mance (%)2 |
Impact (%)3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drax | 2.1 | 2.0 | 56.1 | 0.6 |
| Standard Chartered | 2.2 | 1.7 | 32.8 | 0.5 |
| Pearson | 2.6 | 2.3 | 14.2 | 0.4 |
| QinetiQ | 2.0 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 0.4 |
| Scottish Mortgage IT | – | -0.6 | -42.1 | 0.3 |
| Security | weight (%)1 |
Weight Portfolio relative to index (%)1 |
Relative perfor mance (%)2 |
Impact (%)3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HSBC | 0.2 | -3.9 | 41.6 | -1.3 |
| BP | – | -3.0 | 54.3 | -1.3 |
| 888 (Gibraltar) | 1.0 | 0.9 | -70.7 | -1.1 |
| Pets At Home | 2.8 | 2.7 | -35.7 | -1.1 |
| British American Tobacco |
– | -2.9 | 34.8 | -0.8 |
Source: Schroders, Factset, for Schroder Income Growth investment portfolio, 12 months to end August 2022.
Average weights over period.
Total return of the stock relative to the FTSE All-Share TR over the period.
Contribution to performance relative to the FTSE All-Share TR.
The securities shown above are for illustrative purposes only and are not to be considered a recommendation to buy or sell.
Turnover in the portfolio has been influenced by our view of increased and enduring inflation risks and associated rises in bond yields, as well as higher interest rates and the squeeze on consumer incomes, which have led us to establish new positions in stocks we believe are set to benefit from this environment, as well as adding to holdings which we believe will prove resilient in this situation.
Significant additions were made mainly in our banks and oil & gas allocations, financed by reductions in the portfolio's exposure to the mining sector and certain consumer discretionary areas which, in our view, were potentially vulnerable to the squeeze on consumer incomes from higher interest rates and inflationary pressures.
Starting with banks, we initiated new positions in UK domestic bank, Lloyds, and Asian bank, Standard Chartered, at the start of the period and added to them early in 2022. Lloyds is well-capitalised and focused on lower-risk mortgage lending. Furthermore, like all UK banks, Lloyds has provisioned very conservatively through the pandemic and retains a strong capital position. We believe the company is well placed to benefit from higher interest rates. Asian-focused bank, Standard Chartered, is exposed to US interest rate rises. We believe Standard Chartered currently trades at an attractive valuation, which we would expect to be lifted as profitability improves. We continued to add to the Company's position in the banking sector over the period as it became clear that central banks were on a sustained trend of raising interest rates to combat persistent inflationary pressures. We subsequently broadened our holdings to include another attractively-valued and well-capitalised domestic bank, Natwest, as well as large, diversified Asian banking business, HSBC.
Having cut positions in oil majors in the autumn of 2019 and start of 2020 on the belief that they would struggle to manage the energy transition while supporting shareholder returns, we have continued to reassess the situation and have become

more optimistic. In 2019, BP and Shell were heavily committed to paying dividends and buying back stock from shareholders. Additionally, they had ongoing obligations to service their significant debt levels. At that time, combining these commitments with the significant required investments in renewable energy sources did not seem, in our view, to add up. We constantly review the investment case for companies and are always open to changing our minds. This is often on the basis of valuations, which are now more appealing than prior to the pandemic. We have subsequently rebuilt the portfolio's position size in Shell, following a reassessment of the number of significant changes to the company and the outlook for the both the oil price and demand. Dividends were rebased to more sustainable levels in 2020 and improved disclosures give us a sense of what is required to implement their transition strategies. The oil price has strengthened from the lows of early 2020, which enables investment, has boosted cashflows and reduced debt. Shell has a good mix of downstream and gas assets – the integrated gas and marketing business puts the company in a good place to monetise the recovery in demand from Covid and the dislocations between emerging markets and developed markets through its trading activities. Dividends are now growing, supplemented by capital returns to shareholders in the form of share buy backs.
Within the mining sector, we exited our position in BHP, as the stock had performed better around its delisting from the premium segment of the UK market in order to consolidate its listing on the Australian Index. The past three years have seen strong operational and share price performance across the sector. In our view, future shareholder returns and valuations appear more attractive in oils and banks.
As mentioned earlier, we also made reductions in certain consumer discretionary areas which, in our view, were potentially vulnerable to the squeeze on consumer incomes from higher interest rates and inflationary pressures. These included exits from positions in housebuilder Taylor Wimpey and builders merchant Travis Perkins. Additionally, we were unconvinced by the rationale and details of an acquisition of another property business proposed by Workspace and exited our position, reinvesting proceeds into our existing position in private patient practice property company Assura.
Meanwhile, corporate activity again featured as a driving rationale for stocks exiting the portfolio - we sold our holding in Avast following receipt of a bid from US peer NortonLifeLock, while a take-private transaction removed publishing and risk business Daily Mail and General Trust, which has been held in the portfolio for some years.
More recently we have seen a continuation of the appreciation of the US dollar against most major currencies including the pound to add to existing inflation worries. The decline in sterling allied to rising rates will translate into higher import and borrowing costs for many UK companies, with energy, in particular, priced in dollars. While the UK government's energy packages should cushion the impact on households and businesses for a period, and have a helpful knock-on effect on the inflation rate we acknowledge the current unprecedented squeeze on consumer incomes that a combination of higher inflation, energy and mortgage costs is having on consumers.
The UK is not alone in harbouring recessionary fears, as both the US and Europe are also showing signs of economic deterioration. Ultimately, these challenges will fade at some point in the future and we remain focused on companies' long-term fundamental prospects and their income generation ability. It is worth highlighting that the UK market includes many companies which are overseas earners, whose profits, dividends, revenues and valuations could all potentially benefit from a falling pound. Meanwhile, we continue to have a section of the portfolio invested in domestically-focused areas, composed of companies which have significant opportunities to benefit from weaker competition going out of business.
Regardless of external conditions, our aims and our investment approach remain constant: to construct a diversified portfolio of mispriced opportunities capable of delivering both real growth of income and attractive capital returns.
The market volatility in 2022 has been yet another reminder of the importance of diversification when constructing portfolios. We remain bottom-up stock pickers looking for idiosyncratic investment opportunities in individual companies. We continue to see an attractive opportunity set of mispriced assets in the UK equity market, as the market as a whole has been, and continues to be, out of favour with international investors. Subsequently, we will continue to utilise our ability to use gearing to potentially enhance returns.
9 November 2022
The securities referred to above are for illustrative purposes only and are not to be considered a recommendation to buy or sell.
Companies in bold represent the 20 largest investments, which by value account for 68.3% (2021: 67.7%) of total investments. All companies are headquartered in the UK unless otherwise stated.
All investments are equities, listed on a recognised stock exchange.
| £'000 | % | £'000 | % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financials | Basic Materials | ||||
| Empiric Student Property | 6,764 | 2.9 | Anglo American | 9,081 | 3.9 |
| Standard Chartered | 6,418 | 2.8 | Rio Tinto | 7,068 | 3.1 |
| Lloyds Bank | 5,933 | 2.6 | Johnson Matthey | 4,855 | 2.1 |
| Assura | 5,898 | 2.5 | Total Basic Materials | 21,004 | 9.1 |
| Legal & General | 5,237 | 2.3 | Oil and Gas | ||
| Prudential | 4,768 | 2.1 | Shell | 19,983 | 8.6 |
| Direct Line | 4,477 | 1.9 | Total Oil and Gas | 19,983 | 8.6 |
| Unite | 3,705 | 1.6 | Industrials | ||
| HSBC | 3,579 | 1.6 | Balfour Beatty | 5,061 | 2.2 |
| 3i Group | 3,454 | 1.5 | QinetiQ | 4,792 | 2.1 |
| Natwest Group | 3,271 | 1.4 | Bunzl | 3,641 | 1.6 |
| Intermediate Capital | 2,889 | 1.3 | Paypoint | 2,426 | 1.1 |
| M&G | 2,540 | 1.1 | SThree | 2,255 | 1.0 |
| TP ICAP | 2,373 | 1.0 | Spectris | 1,162 | 0.5 |
| Petershill Partners | 1,443 | 0.6 | Total Industrials | 19,337 | 8.5 |
| Total Financials | 62,749 | 27.2 | Utilities | ||
| Consumer Services | Drax | 5,440 | 2.4 | ||
| RELX | 8,777 | 3.8 | National Grid | 5,248 | 2.3 |
| Pearson | 7,558 | 3.3 | SSE | 3,596 | 1.6 |
| Tesco | 7,061 | 3.0 | Total Utilities | 14,284 | 6.3 |
| Pets At Home | 6,368 | 2.8 | Consumer Goods | ||
| Whitbread | 4,399 | 1.9 | Unilever | 7,159 | 3.1 |
| Hollywood Bowl | 3,879 | 1.7 | Burberry | 5,350 | 2.3 |
| 888 (Gibraltar) | 1,701 | 0.7 | Total Consumer Goods | 12,509 | 5.4 |
| National Express | 1,092 | 0.5 | Telecommunications | ||
| Cazoo | 97 | 0.0 | BT | 7,018 | 3.0 |
| Total Consumer Services | 40,932 | 17.7 | Total Telecommunications | 7,018 | 3.0 |
| Healthcare | Total Investments | 230,497 | 100.0 | ||
| AstraZeneca | 18,138 | 7.8 | |||
| GSK (GlaxoSmithKline) | 8,360 | 3.6 | |||
| ConvaTec | 4,222 | 1.9 | |||
| Haleon | 1,961 | 0.9 | |||
| Total Healthcare | 32,681 | 14.2 |

The Strategic Report sets out the Company's strategy for delivering the investment objective (set out on the inside front cover), the business model, the risks involved and how the board manages and mitigates those risks. It also details the Company's purpose, values and culture, and how it interacts with stakeholders.

The Company is a listed investment trust, that has outsourced its operations to third party service providers. The board has appointed the Manager, Schroder Unit Trusts Limited to implement the investment strategy and to manage the Company's assets in line with the appropriate restrictions placed on it by the board, including limits on the type and relative size of holdings which may be held in the portfolio and on the use of gearing, cash, derivatives and other financial instruments as appropriate. The terms of the appointment are described more completely in the Directors' Report. The Manager also promotes the Company using its sales and marketing teams. The board and Manager work together to deliver the Company's investment objective, as demonstrated in the diagram above. The investment and promotion processes set out in the diagram are described in more detail below.
The investment approach is based on Schroders' belief that stock markets are inefficient. The Manager believes it can exploit such inefficiencies by conducting its own research, through disciplined portfolio construction, and taking a long-term view.
The Company's lead manager, Sue Noffke, has been a member of Schroders' UK Equity team for over 20 years and has been managing the Company's portfolio since 2010. The investment team employs a rigorous and disciplined investment process aiming to deliver consistent outperformance with low volatility against set objectives.
The manager and the rest of Schroders' UK Equity team work closely with Schroders' specialist industry analysts who conduct independent fundamental research. As one of the largest UK investors, Schroders has substantial access to companies' management teams. The research focuses on factors that influence a company's ability to create value for shareholders over the long-term and looks beyond short-term profits to a company's profits potential and to the quality of those profits. The focus is not exclusively on growth, value, or earnings momentum factors but on each company's individual ability to create value for shareholders.
The decision to buy or sell a security lies with the manager, and bottom-up (that is based on analysis of individual companies rather than general market or sector trends) stock selection is therefore the primary influence on portfolio performance. When assessing stocks for inclusion in the portfolio and in managing existing investments, the Manager places a greater emphasis on the sustainability and the potential growth of a company's dividend rather than a high initial yield. The size of each holding is determined on the basis of investment conviction and an assessment of the risks and volatility associated with it, rather than its market value. Portfolio construction is supported by a robust system of risk controls. Proprietary risk tools help the manager and the board to understand the factors contributing to risk and to avoid unintended risk.
The Manager may invest up to 20% of assets in overseas stocks and this is utilised in three main ways: for added diversification where overseas equities are cheaper than their
equivalents in the UK; when attractive dividends are available; and for exposure to sectors that are not well represented in the UK equity market.
The management of a relatively concentrated portfolio requires a rigorous sell discipline enforced by competition for capital. The Manager will sell a holding if its share price reaches a level where there appear to be better opportunities elsewhere or if a material change in a company's circumstances makes the original investment case no longer valid. Given the long-term approach, portfolio turnover tends to be low.
As managers of the Company, we are stewards of capital, focusing on the long-term prospects of the assets in which we invest. We analyse each investment's ability to create, sustain and protect value to ensure that it can deliver returns in line with our shareholders' objectives.
We view ourselves as responsible investors. Responsible investment considers companies' citizenship and their contribution to society in the context of achieving investment objectives. We appreciate that many shareholders want to use their investment to support more responsibly run businesses, and that many investors have concerns over specific activities to which they do not want their investment exposed.
As a result of the above, we choose to adopt the model of ESG integration. Our investment approach explicitly considers ESG factors as a source of alpha generation. In our view, ESG and industrial trends are intrinsically linked. Today, companies face competitive pressures from a wider range of sources, on a larger scale and at a faster pace. We identify the key ESG issues of each company we invest in, and analyse and examine the management of these in order to determine the risk profile of an investment. This helps inform our assessment of both upside opportunity and downside protection.
To us, effective ESG integration means conducting a rigorous bottom up examination of a company's ESG performance and incorporating that analysis into investment decisions rather than outsourcing that analysis to third parties.
As part of our process, we meet with company management teams in advance of investing, as well as meeting with the management of all portfolio companies at least once a year. In many cases we meet with them more than this, as well as engaging with board members. In addition, we will attend meetings with the majority of management teams of companies in the FTSE 350 over the course of a year as we regularly review the investment cases of companies not held in the portfolio. Our work here is aided by our internal resource of over 20 dedicated ESG specialists.
We have always taken pride in our level of engagement with companies. Our brand, as well as extensive analytical resource affords us the ability to regularly engage with companies on all aspects of corporate strategy, including ESG matters.
The chart below shows an illustration of the main engagement issues the investment team have had with UK companies over the past three years.

Schroder UK Equity team ESG engagements – past 3 years
Most significant engagement topics
Source: Schroders. Most significant engagement topics over 3 years to 31 December 2021. For illustrative purposes only and should not be viewed as a recommendation to buy or sell.
The below table shows the number of company meetings and resolutions the Company voted on in the last one and three years.
| 20221 | 2020-22 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | % | Number | % | |
| Meetings | 46 | 140 | ||
| Resolutions | 861 | 2473 | ||
| Votes with management |
840 | 97.6 | 2381 | 97.9 |
| Votes against management |
21 | 2.4 | 6 | 2.1 |
| Did not vote | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1Calendar years. 2022 to 31 August.
Where we vote against, in the majority of cases this has been to oppose the re-election of a director or to oppose the remuneration report. We will oppose the re-election of a director for a number of reasons including 'over-boarding', where we believe a director holds too many board positions at once so are unable to dedicate sufficient time to each. In the case of remuneration, we push for management teams to have firm alignment with shareholders.
A number of topics come up consistently in our engagements with all companies. Executive remuneration would be an example here. We engage to ensure that executive pay is of an appropriate quantum, is aligned with the interest of shareholders and incorporates ESG metrics in an appropriate way. During Covid this has been an area of even higher scrutiny, particularly for companies whose businesses have been materially impacted by the pandemic. For those that took government support we opposed bonus payments until this support had been repaid.
A particular focus for engagement in 2022 has been Climate. The investment team conducted a number of engagements with portfolio companies over the course of the year to understand approaches to net zero and encourage best practice.
In addition to topics that come up consistently across the portfolio, there are other company specific engagements that occur on an ad hoc basis in response to events. A number of these are outlined below.
Johnson Matthey has been a long term holding and multi year engagement on governance and environmental opportunities.
We believe Johnson Matthey has significant potential to grow earnings due to the growing demand for low carbon environmental technologies and clean air legislation in the automotive sector. We think the market under appreciated the longevity of earnings from their automotive catalyst business, particularly in Asia where emissions standards continue to tighten. Governments in countries such as India and China are looking to improve air quality by implementing policies similar to those in place in Europe. This drives demand for Johnson Matthey's automotive catalysts. In addition, for many years the business has had a significant presence in technologies used in the hydrogen supply chain. Hydrogen is increasingly recognised as being a key component of the transition to a world powered by low carbon energy sources.
We have had many engagements with the board, executive management team and operational management over the course of 2021/22.
Our patience in the opportunity for the company to provide environmental technologies was somewhat rewarded when it was announced in April 2022 that US industrial conglomerate 'Standard Industries' had taken a strategic stake in the company and the shares responded positively.
This is a case of a company where our work suggested an under appreciated opportunity in environmental technology and our active engagement with the company has been a part of unlocking this.
We have engaged multiple times with BT over the course of the year on subjects such as company strategy and governance. While in general being a leader on sustainability issues (particularly strong in areas of supply chain management and approach to net zero), the company still have areas to improve. One example is that they did not participate in the Workforce Disclosure Initiative this year (which Schroders are a supporter of). In our engagement with the company, we have made clear our support for WDI, and have encouraged the company to disclose next year.
BHP Group was a long term holding in the Trust which was sold during the year. In 2022 the company announced its intention to unify its corporate structure in Australia. This would mean losing its Premium listing on the London Stock Exchange and thus it would no longer be eligible for inclusion in the FTSE 100 index and would not be bound by the standard of regulation and corporate governance standards of a Premium listing. Despite understanding the rationale for the company to want to do this, we did not think it was in the interest of our clients to lose a high quality, world leading company from the UK stock market. We therefore expressed this view to the company and voted against the unification. In the end the company won the vote, but again it is a demonstration that we believe it is important to stand up for what we believe is in the best interests of our clients.
Our policies on sustainability are based on what we have learned from more than 20 years of integrating ESG analysis for our clients. The below chart shows a number of milestones hit over the last 20 years of ESG integration at Schroders.
As a result of the above, we are fortunate to have access to a dedicated team of over 20 ESG specialists. Their role is to

'Issues such as climate change, resource scarcity, population growth and corporate failure have put responsible investment at the forefront of investors' minds. We believe that companies with a strong environmental, social and governance ethos tend to deliver better results for our clients.'
Source: Schroders, September 2022.
1Carbon Disclosure Project. 2UN Principles for Responsible Investing. 3UN Global Compact. 4Strategy and Governance module. 5For certain businesses acquired during the course of 2020 and 2021 we have not yet integrated ESG factors into investment decision-making. There are also a small number of strategies for which ESG integration is not practicable or now possible, for example passive index tracking or legacy businesses or investments in the process of or soon to be liquidated, and certain joint venture businesses are excluded.
research ESG themes within sectors, as well as to analyse and engage with individual companies on these issues. We engage with the output of this team regularly to allow us to integrate these factors into our investment process.
As with many issues, there is a desire from some corners of the industry for a 'one size fits all' scoring system to apply to ESG issues. As a result, there are a number of third party providers trying to provide 'ESG' benchmarks. While this is good in theory, in practice we see a number of flaws to this approach.
Our view is that these systems run the risk of oversimplifying a topic that is too complex to be captured in a single number. We see plenty of evidence that the tick box approach does not work, from the returns generated by technology companies with unconventional governance structures to the failure of companies which on paper had all the right committees and governance structures in place.
In 2019 Schroders rolled out an internal ESG accreditation process. Each investment manager can apply to be 'accredited' by submitting a document articulating how they integrate ESG into their investment process. Schroders' Sustainable Investment Team awards accreditation based on this submission fulfilling a number of criteria. The award is then annually reviewed against this consistent criteria.
There are 3 sustainability categories to distinguish each product/fund approach:
The managers of the investment Company achieved Schroders Integrated accreditation status in 2019, and had this renewed in 2020, 2021 and 2022. The award submission detailed the Manager's use of Schroders proprietary tools CONTEXT and SustainEx to deepen our ESG analysis.

Peter Harrison, Group Chief Executive, Schroders plc
Risk in relation to the Company's investments is spread as a result of the Manager investing the Company's portfolio with a view to ensuring that the portfolio retains an appropriate balance to meet the Company's investment objectives. The key restrictions imposed on the Manager include: (i) no more than 15% of the Company's total net assets, at the date of acquisition, may be invested in any one single company; (ii) no

more than 10% of the value of the Company's gross assets may be invested in other listed investment companies unless such companies have a stated investment policy not to invest more than 15% of their gross assets in other investment companies or investment trusts which are listed on the Official List of the London Stock Exchange; (iii) no more than 15% of the Company's gross assets may be invested in other investment companies or investment trusts which are listed on the Official List of the London Stock Exchange; (iv) no more than 15% of the Company's total net assets may be invested in open-ended funds; and (v) no more than 25% of the Company's total net assets may be invested in the aggregate in unlisted investments and holdings representing 20% or more of the equity capital of any company.
The investment portfolio on page 9 demonstrates that, as at 31 August 2022, the Manager invested in 44 UK equity investments spread across nine industry sectors. The board believes that the diversity of the stocks, along with the abovementioned restrictions imposed on the Manager, achieve the objective of spreading investment risk.
The Company promotes its shares to a broad range of investors who have the potential to be long-term supporters of the investment strategy. The Company seeks to achieve this through its Manager and corporate broker, which promote the shares of the Company through regular contact with both current and potential shareholders.
Promotion is focused via three channels:
These activities consist of investor meetings, one-on-one meetings, regional road shows and attendance at conferences for professional investors. In addition, the Company's shares are supported by the Manager's wider marketing of investment companies targeted at all types of investors; this includes maintaining close relationships with advisers and execution-only platforms, advertising in the trade press, maintaining relationships with financial journalists and the provision of digital information on Schroders' website. The board also seeks active engagement with investors, and meetings with the Chairman are offered to professional investors where appropriate.
Shareholders are also encouraged to sign up to the Manager's Investment Trusts update, to receive information on the Company directly https://www.schroders.com/en/uk/privateinvestor/fund-centre/funds-in-focus/investment-trusts/ schroders-investment-trusts/never-miss-an-update/
Details of the board's approach to discount management and share issuance may be found in the Annual General Meeting Recommendations on page 55.
The board reviews performance using a number of key measures, to monitor and assess the Company's success in achieving its objective. Further comment on performance can be found in the Chairman's statement. The following KPIs are used:
Some KPIs are Alternative Performance Measures (APMs), and further details can be found on page 2 and definitions of these terms on page 59.
The Company's purpose is to create long-term shareholder value.
The Company's culture is driven by its values: Transparency, Engagement and Rigour, with collegial behaviour and constructive, robust challenge. The values are all centred on achieving returns for shareholders in line with the Company's investment objective. The board also promotes the effective management or mitigation of the risks faced by the Company and, to the extent it does not conflict with the investment objective, aims to structure the Company's operations with regard to all its stakeholders and take account of the impact of the Company's operations on the environment and community.
As the Company has no employees and acts through its service providers, its culture is represented by the values and behaviour of the board and third parties to which it delegates. The board aims to fulfil the Company's investment objective by encouraging a culture of constructive challenge with all key suppliers and openness with all stakeholders. The board is responsible for embedding the Company's culture in the Company's operations.
The board recognises the Company's responsibilities with respect to corporate and social responsibility and engages with its outsourced service providers to safeguard the Company's interests. As part of this ongoing monitoring, the board receives reporting from its service providers with respect to their anti-bribery and corruption policies; Modern Slavery Act 2015 statements; diversity policies; and greenhouse gas and energy usage reporting.
As at 31 August 2022, the board comprised two men and two women. The board has adopted a diversity and inclusion policy. Appointments and succession plans will always be based on merit and objective criteria and, within this context, the board seeks to promote diversity of gender, social and ethnic backgrounds, cognitive and personal strengths. The board will encourage any recruitment agencies it engages to find a range of candidates that meet the objective criteria
agreed for each appointment. Candidates for board vacancies are selected based on their skills and experience, which are matched against the balance of skills and experience of the overall board taking into account the criteria for the role being offered. The board also considers the diversity and inclusion policies of its service providers.
The board is cognisant of the new Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules (DTR) to improve transparency on the diversity of company boards and feels well positioned for these guidelines. The board consists two men and two women, with Victoria Muir appointed senior independent director following the AGM.
The Company continues to be committed to carrying out its business fairly and operates a financial crime policy, covering bribery and corruption, tax evasion, money laundering, terrorist financing and sanctions, as well as seeking confirmations that the Company's service providers' policies are operating soundly.
As the Company outsources its operations to third parties, it has no significant greenhouse gas emissions and energy usage to report.
Shareholder relations are given high priority by both the board and the Manager and are detailed further in "Promotion" on page 14.
In addition to the engagement and meetings held during the year described on page 23, the chairs of the board and committees and the other directors, usually attend the AGM and are available to respond to queries and concerns from shareholders. The board is keen to hear from shareholders and can do so by writing to the Company Secretary (Company Secretary, Schroder Income Growth Fund plc, 1 London Wall Place, London EC2Y 5AU), or emailing [email protected].
The Company delegates to its Manager the responsibility for taking environmental, social and governance ("ESG") issues into account when assessing the selection, retention and realisation of investments. The board expects the Manager to engage with investee companies on social, environmental and business ethics issues and to promote best practice. The board expects the Manager to exercise the Company's voting rights in consideration of these issues.
In addition to the description of the Manager's integration of ESG into the investment process and the details in the Strategic Review on pages 10 to 18, a description of the Manager's policy, and its engagement with investee companies on these matters, can be found on the Schroders website at https://www.schroders.com/en/sustainability/activeownership/.
The board notes that Schroders believes that companies with good ESG management often perform better and deliver superior returns over time. Engaging with companies to understand how they approach ESG management is an integral part of the investment process. Schroders is compliant with the UK Stewardship Code and its compliance with the principles therein is reported on its website.
The board has received reporting from the Manager on the application of its policy.
The board has identified its key stakeholders as the Company's shareholders and service providers. The board notes the Company has no employees and the impact of its own operations on the environment and local community is through the impact its service providers have.
Engagement with key stakeholders assists the board in meeting the obligation for directors to act in a way that promotes the success of the Company, taking into account their interests. This statement outlines this engagement and the impact on decision making where appropriate, and cross-refers to the decisions made by the board during the year, detailed elsewhere in this report.
As detailed in "Promotion" on page 14 and "Relations with Shareholders" on page 15, the Company engages with its shareholders. The board considered feedback by shareholders, relayed by the Manager and the corporate broker, when making decisions relating to share issuance, dividend decisions and review of board composition. Further details on shareholder engagement are included in the Chairman's Statement.
As detailed in "Purpose, Values and Culture" on page 14, the board engages with service providers, and receives regular reporting, either directly, or through the Manager or Company Secretary, on performance and other matters. Relevant engagement is detailed in the Chairman's Statement, Managers' Review, Audit and Risk Committee and Management Engagement Committee Report.
Principal decisions taken during the year were: (1) dividend decisions (2) strategy and (3) board changes. For each of these decisions the board took into account feedback from shareholders, either directly or through service providers and advisers. The board also took into account the views of its service providers, including the Manager. The board is pleased to report its engagements were constructive and led to positive outcomes, as detailed in the Chairman's Statement and committee reports.

The board is responsible for the Company's system of risk management and internal control and for reviewing its effectiveness. The board has adopted a detailed matrix of principal risks affecting the Company's business as an investment trust and has established associated policies and processes designed to manage and, where possible, mitigate those risks, which are monitored by the Audit and Risk Committee on an ongoing basis. This system assists the board in determining the nature and extent of the risks it is willing to take in achieving the Company's strategic objectives. Both the principal risks and the monitoring system are also subject to robust assessment at least annually. The last assessment took place in October 2022.
Although the board believes that it has a robust framework of internal control in place this can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance against material financial misstatement or loss and is designed to manage, not eliminate, risk.
Actions taken by the board and, where appropriate, its committees, to manage and mitigate the Company's principal risks and uncertainties are set out in the table below.
During the period, the board also discussed and monitored a number of risks which could affect the valuations of investee companies. Two particular market risks were considered, political risk and climate change risk. The board receives updates from the portfolio managers, Company Secretary and other service providers on other potential risks that could affect the Company.
Political risk includes the impact of geopolitical risk, regional tensions, trade wars and sanctions against companies. During the period, the board noted that the invasion of Ukraine impacted political tensions, supply chains, interest rates and in particular higher inflation in the UK and globally. The board is also mindful that changes to financial and public policy could impact the Company in the future.
Climate change risk includes how climate change could affect the Company's investments, and potentially shareholder returns. The board notes the Manager has integrated ESG considerations, including climate change, into the investment process. The board will continue to monitor this.
The board considers that both political risks and climate risks referred to above are covered in the risk matrix under market risks.
| Risk | Mitigation and management |
|---|---|
| Strategic The Company's investment objectives may become out of line with the requirements of investors, resulting in a wide discount of the share price to underlying NAV per share. |
The appropriateness of the Company's investment remit is periodically reviewed and success of the Company in meeting its stated objectives is monitored. Share price relative to NAV per share is monitored and the use of buy back authorities is considered on a regular basis. The marketing and distribution activity is actively reviewed. Proactive engagement with shareholders. |
| The Company's cost base could become | The ongoing competitiveness of all service provider fees is subject to |
| uncompetitive, particularly in light of open | periodic benchmarking against its competitors. |
| ended alternatives. | Annual consideration of management fee levels. |
| Investment management | Review of the Manager's compliance with the agreed investment |
| The Manager's investment strategy, if | restrictions, investment performance and risk against investment objectives |
| inappropriate, may result in the Company | and strategy; relative performance; the portfolio's risk profile; and |
| underperforming the market and/or peer | appropriate strategies employed to mitigate any negative impact of |
| group companies, leading to the Company | substantial changes in markets. |
| and its objectives becoming unattractive to | Annual review of the ongoing suitability of the Manager, including resources |
| investors. | and key personnel risk. |
| Risk | Mitigation and management |
|---|---|
| Market The Company is exposed to the effect of market fluctuations due to the nature of its business. A significant fall in equity markets could have an adverse impact on the market value of the Company's underlying investments. |
The risk profile of the portfolio is considered and appropriate strategies to mitigate any negative impact of substantial changes in markets are discussed with the Manager. |
| Currency Currency risk is the risk that changes in foreign currency exchange rates impact negatively the value or level of dividend of the Company's investments. |
The Manager monitors the impact of foreign currency movements on the portfolio and is able to rebalance the portfolio towards stocks which are less impacted by changes in foreign currency exchange rates if required. |
| Custody Safe custody of the Company's assets may be compromised through control failures by the depositary. |
The depositary reports on the safe custody of the Company's assets, including cash and portfolio holdings, which are independently reconciled with the Manager's records. The review of audited internal controls reports covering custodial arrangements is undertaken. An annual report from the depositary on its activities, including matters arising from custody operations is reviewed. |
| Gearing The Company utilises a credit facility. This arrangement increases the funds available for investment through borrowing. While this has the potential to enhance investment returns in rising markets, in falling markets the impact could be detrimental to performance. |
Gearing is monitored and strict restrictions on borrowings are imposed: gearing continues to operate within pre-agreed limits so as not to exceed 25% of shareholders' funds. |
| Accounting, legal and regulatory In order to continue to qualify as an investment trust, the Company must comply with the requirements of section 1158 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010. Breaches of the UK Listing Rules, the Companies Act or other regulations with which the Company is required to comply, could lead to a number of detrimental outcomes. |
The confirmation of compliance with relevant laws and regulations by key service providers. Shareholder documents and announcements, including the Company's published annual report are subject to stringent review processes. Procedures have been established to safeguard against disclosure of inside information. |
| Service provider The Company has no employees and has delegated certain functions to a number of service providers, principally the Manager, depositary and registrar. Failure of controls and poor performance of any service provider could lead to disruption, reputational damage or loss. |
Service providers are appointed subject to due diligence processes and with clearly-documented contractual arrangements detailing service expectations. Regular reports are provided by key service providers and the quality of services provided are monitored. Audited internal controls reports from key service providers, including confirmation of business continuity arrangements, are reviewed annually. |
| Cyber The Company's service providers are all exposed to the risk of cyber attacks. Cyber attacks could lead to loss of personal or confidential information or disrupt operations. |
Service providers report on cyber risk mitigation and management at least annually, which includes confirmation of business continuity capability in the event of a cyber attack. In addition, the board received presentations from the Manager, the registrar and the safekeeping agent and custodian on cyber risk. |

Risk assessment includes consideration of the scope and quality of the systems of internal control operating within key service providers, and ensures regular communication of the results of monitoring by such providers to the Audit and Risk Committee, including the incidence of significant control failings or weaknesses that have been identified at any time and the extent to which they have resulted in unforeseen outcomes or contingencies that may have a material impact on the Company's performance or condition.
No significant control failings or weaknesses were identified from the Audit and Risk Committee's ongoing risk assessment which has been in place throughout the financial year and up to the date of this report. The board is satisfied that it has undertaken a detailed review of the risks facing the Company.
A full analysis of the financial risks facing the Company is set out in note 19 to the accounts on pages 50 to 53.
The directors have assessed the viability of the Company over a five year period, taking into account the Company's position at 31 August 2022 and the potential impacts of the principal risks and uncertainties it faces for the review period. The directors have assessed the Company's operational resilience and they are satisfied that the Company's outsourced service providers will continue to operate effectively, following the implementation of their business continuity plans.
A period of five years has been chosen as the board believes that this reflects a suitable time horizon for strategic planning, taking into account the investment policy, liquidity of investments, potential impact of economic cycles, nature of operating costs, dividends and availability of funding.
In its assessment of the viability of the Company, the directors have considered each of the Company's principal risks and uncertainties detailed on pages 16 and 17 and in particular the impact of a significant fall in UK equity markets on the value of the Company's investment portfolio. The directors have considered the Company's income and expenditure projections and the fact that the Company's investments comprise readily realisable securities which can be sold to meet funding requirements if necessary and on that basis consider that five years is an appropriate time period. The directors also considered the beneficial tax treatment the Company is eligible for as an investment trust. If changes to these taxation arrangements were to be made it would affect the viability of the Company to act as an effective investment vehicle.
Whilst the Company's articles of association require that a proposal for the continuation of the Company be put forward at the AGM in 2025, the Directors have no present reason to believe such a resolution will not be passed by shareholders.
The Directors have considered the Company's income and expenditure projections and the fact that the Company's investments comprise readily realisable securities which can be sold to meet funding requirements if necessary. On that basis consider that five years is an appropriate time period.
The directors also considered a stress test in which the Company's NAV dropped by 50% and noted that, based on the assumptions in the test, the Company would continue to be viable over a five year period. Based on the Company's processes for monitoring operating costs, the board's view that the Manager has the appropriate depth and quality of resource to achieve superior returns in the longer term, the portfolio risk profile, limits imposed on gearing, counterparty exposure, liquidity risk and financial controls, the directors have concluded that there is a reasonable expectation that the Company will be able to continue in operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due over the five year period of their assessment.
The directors have assessed the principal risks, the impact of the emerging risks and uncertainties and the matters referred to in the viability statement. The board have considered climate risk, political risk and external market factors in their assessment. Based on the work the directors have performed, they have not identified any material uncertainties relating to events or conditions that, individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt on the Company's ability to continue as a going concern for the period assessed by the directors, being the period to 30 November 2023 which is at least 12 months from the date the financial statements were authorised for issue.
By order of the board
9 November 2022

Length of service: 10 years – appointed as a director on 1 June 2012 and Chairman in December 2019
Experience: Bridget Guerin was the managing director of Matrix Money Management Limited, an asset management and distribution firm, from its launch in 1999 until March 2011. She is an independent non-executive director of Mobeus Income & Growth VCT plc and of Invesco Perpetual UK Smaller Companies Investment Trust plc. From 2000 until 2009 she was a director of Matrix Group Limited and sat on the Board of Charles Stanley Group plc between 2012 and 2020.
Contribution: Bridget brings her executive experience and marketing knowledge. Committee membership: Audit and Risk, Management Engagement, Nomination and Remuneration Committees (chairman of the Management Engagement Committee)
Current remuneration: £36,000 per annum Shares held: 18,852*
Length of service: 5 years – appointed a director in December 2017
Length of service: 11 years – appointed a director in December 2008
finance director of The British Red Cross Society until December 2007.
Experience: Ewen Cameron Watt was a managing director at Blackrock, where he spent the majority of his career (including predecessor companies). From 2011 to 2016, he was chief investment strategist at Blackrock Investment Institute. Prior to joining Blackrock, he held senior investment roles in the UK and Hong Kong, including as portfolio manager from 1995 to 2010 and head of Asian research for SG Warburg from 1990 to 1995. Ewen is also an independent adviser to a number of endowments and pension funds. He began his career as an analyst at EB Savory Miln in 1978.
Contribution: Ewen brings his extensive financial services and investment experience.
Committee membership: Audit and Risk, Management Engagement, Nomination and Remuneration Committees (chairman of the Nomination Committee)
Experience: David Causer is a chartered accountant and a member of The Securities Institute. He has held a number of senior positions within financial organisations including Finance Director of Mercury Asset Management Group plc and a managing director of Merrill Lynch Investment Managers until 2001. He was
Committee membership: Audit and Risk, Management Engagement and Nomination and Remuneration Committees (chairman of the Audit and Risk
Current remuneration: £26,000 per annum Shares held: 13,000*
Current remuneration: £29,000 per annum


David Causer
Status: independent non-executive director
Committee)
Shares held: 43,750*

Length of service: 3 years – appointed as a director on 17 December 2019 Experience: Fraser McIntyre has nearly 30 years of experience in financial services, including asset management, investment banking and audit. He started his career auditing financial services companies before working in the prime brokerage/equity divisions of two banks. He has been COO at several multi-billion dollar hedge funds where he was responsible for overseeing all operational areas of the business, including finance and accounting, operations, risk, legal and compliance. He has sat on a number of fund and management company boards whose investments covered a wide range of asset classes across traditional and alternative strategies.
Fraser is a Chartered Accountant. He has held a variety of executive positions within the financial services sector, most recently as Chief Operating Officer of Cantab Capital LLP which became part of GAM.
Contribution: Fraser brings his experience in financial services, including asset management, investment banking and audit.
Committee membership: Audit and Risk, Management Engagement, Nomination and Remuneration Committees (chairman of the Audit and Risk Committee)
Current remuneration: £31,000 per annum Shares held: 7,704*

Length of service: 3 years – appointed a director on 23 July 2019
Experience: Victoria Muir is a Chartered Director and a Fellow of the Institute of Directors. She has held a variety of executive positions within the financial services sector, most notably as an executive director of Royal London Asset Management Ltd and some of its sister companies, before pursuing a career as a non-executive director. She is chair of Invesco Select Trust plc, and a director of Premier Miton Global Renewables Trust plc and its subsidiary PMGR Securities 2025 plc. Victoria has over 25 years of experience in financial services, including asset management and inter-dealer broking. Her experience covers a broad range of products and services including investment trusts, segregated accounts, pension funds, insurance products, VCTs and hedge funds and a wide breadth of asset classes across both traditional and alternative investments.
Contribution: Victoria brings her experience in financial services, particularly asset management with a focus on distribution, strategy and governance.
Committee membership: Audit and Risk, Management Engagement, Nomination and Remuneration Committees (chairman of the Remuneration Committee)
Current remuneration: £26,000 per annum Shares held: 3,500*
*Shareholdings are as at 9 November 2022 and include the holdings of connected persons. Full details of directors' shareholdings are set out in the Directors' Remuneration Report on page 30.
The directors submit their report and the audited financial statements of the Company for the year ended 31 August 2022.
The Chairman is an independent non-executive director who is responsible for leadership of the board and ensuring its effectiveness in all aspects of its role. The Chairman's other significant commitments are detailed on page 19. She has no conflicting relationships.
Schroder Investment Management Limited provides company secretarial support to the board and is responsible for assisting the Chairman with board meetings and advising the board with respect to governance. The Company Secretary also manages the relationship with the Company's service providers, except for the Manager. Shareholders wishing to lodge questions in advance of the AGM are invited to do so by writing to the Company Secretary at the address given on the outside back cover.
Four board meetings are usually scheduled each year to deal with matters including: the setting and monitoring of investment strategy; approval of borrowings and/or cash positions; review of investment performance; the level of discount of the Company's shares to underlying NAV; promotion of the Company; and services provided by third parties. Additional meetings of the board are arranged as required.
The board is the Company's governing body; it sets the Company's strategy and is collectively responsible to shareholders for its long-term success. The board is responsible for appointing and subsequently monitoring the activities of the Manager and other service providers to ensure that the investment objective of the Company continues to be met. The board also ensures that the Manager adheres to the investment restrictions set by the board and acts within the parameters set by it in respect of any gearing. The Strategic Review on pages 10 to 18 sets out further detail of how the board reviews the Company's strategy, risk management and internal controls and also includes other information required for the Directors' Report, and is incorporated by reference.
A formal schedule of matters specifically reserved for decision by the board has been defined and a procedure adopted for directors, in the furtherance of their duties, to take independent professional advice at the expense of the Company.
The Chairman ensures that all directors receive relevant management, regulatory and financial information in a timely manner and that they are provided, on a regular basis, with key information on the Company's policies, regulatory requirements and internal controls. The board meets at least quarterly and receives and considers reports regularly from the Manager and other key advisers and ad hoc reports and information are supplied to the board as required.
The board is satisfied that it is of sufficient size with an appropriate balance of diverse skills and experience, independence and knowledge of the Company, its sector and the wider investment trust industry, to enable it to discharge its duties and responsibilities effectively and that no individual or group of individuals dominates decision making.
The board has approved a policy on directors' conflicts of interest. Under this policy, directors are required to disclose all actual and potential conflicts of interest to the board as they arise for consideration and approval. The board may impose restrictions or refuse to authorise such conflicts if deemed appropriate. No directors have any connections with the Manager, shared directorships with other directors or material interests in any contract which is significant to the Company's business.
The board has adopted an outsourced business model and has appointed the following key service providers:
The Company is an alternative investment fund as defined by the AIFM Directive and has appointed Schroder Unit Trusts Limited ("SUTL") as the Manager in accordance with the terms of an alternative investment fund manager ("AIFM") agreement. The AIFM agreement, which is governed by the laws of England and Wales, can be terminated by either party on 12 months' notice or on immediate notice in the event of certain breaches or the insolvency of either party. As at the date of this report no such notice had been given by either party.
SUTL is authorised and regulated by the FCA and provides portfolio management, risk management, accounting and company secretarial services to the Company under the AIFM agreement. The Manager also provides general marketing support for the Company and manages relationships with key investors, in conjunction with the Chairman, other board members or the corporate broker as appropriate. The Manager has delegated investment management, accounting and company secretarial services to another wholly owned subsidiary of Schroders plc, Schroder Investment Management Limited. The Manager has appropriate professional indemnity insurance cover in place.
The Schroders Group manages £773.4 billion (as at 30 June 2022) on behalf of institutional and retail investors, financial institutions and high net-worth clients from around the world, invested in a broad range of asset classes across equities, fixed income, multi-asset and alternatives.
For the period from 1 September 2020 to 28 February 2021, the Manager was entitled to a management fee at a rate of 0.65% per annum on the first £200 million of the Company's assets under management, net of current liabilities other than short-term borrowings, less any cash up to the level of borrowings ("chargeable assets") and a management fee of 0.55% on subsequent amounts. This was payable quarterly in arrears. From 1 March 2021, a management fee was charged

at 0.45% per annum of chargeable assets. A further fee of £150,000 per annum is payable to cover administration and company secretarial fees.
The management fee payable in respect of the year ended 31 August 2022 amounted to £1,054,000 (2021: £1,184,000).
Details of all amounts payable to the Manager are set out in note 4 on page 44.
The board has reviewed the performance of the Manager during the year under review and continues to consider that it has the appropriate depth and quality of resource to deliver the Company's investment objectives over the longer term. Thus, the board considers that the Manager's appointment under the terms of the AIFM agreement, details of which are set out above, is in the best interests of shareholders as a whole.
HSBC Bank plc, which is authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority, carries out certain duties of a depositary specified in the AIFM Directive including, in relation to the Company, as follows:
The Company, the Manager and the depositary may terminate the depositary agreement at any time by giving 90 days' notice in writing. HSBC Bank plc may only be removed from office when a new depositary is appointed by the Company.
Equiniti Limited has been appointed as the Company's registrar. Equiniti's services to the Company include share register maintenance (including the issuance, transfer and cancellation of shares as necessary), acting as agent for the payment of any dividends, management of company meetings (including the registering of proxy votes and scrutineer services as necessary), handling shareholder queries and correspondence and processing corporate actions.
The net revenue return for the year, before finance costs and taxation, was £9,912,000 (2021: 8,458,000). After deducting finance costs and taxation the amount available for distribution to shareholders was £9,693,000 (2021: £8,370,000) equivalent to net revenue of 13.96p (2021: 12.08p) per ordinary share.
The directors of the Company intend to continue to pay dividends at the end of January, April, July and October in each year. Although it is intended to distribute substantially all net income after expenses and taxation, the Company may retain up to a maximum of 15% of the Company's gross income in each year as a revenue reserve to provide consistency in dividend policy.
For the year ended 31 August 2022, the directors have declared four interim dividends, totalling 13.20 (2021: 12.80) pence per ordinary share.
The board of the Company has considered the principles and provisions of the AIC Code of Corporate Governance (the "AIC Code"). The Code addresses the Principles and Provisions set out in the UK Corporate Governance Code (the "UK Code"), as well as setting out additional Provisions on issues that are of specific relevance to the Company.
The board considers that reporting against the Principles and Provisions of the AIC Code, which has been endorsed by the Financial Reporting Council, provides more relevant information to shareholders.
The Financial Conduct Authority requires all UK listed companies to disclose how they have complied with the provisions of the Code. This statement, together with the Statement of Directors' Responsibilities, viability statement and going concern statement set out on pages 32 and 18 respectively indicates how the Company has complied with the principles of good governance of the Code and its requirements on internal control. The Strategic Report and Directors' Report provide further details on the Company's risk management, governance and diversity policies.
The Company has complied with the Principles and Provisions of the AIC Code. The remuneration policy and remuneration of non-executive directors are reviewed by the Remuneration Committee and approved by the board.
The Chairman has served on the board for more than nine years but is still considered independent and will retire from the board at the AGM. Further details can be found on page 29 of the Nomination Committee report. The board takes an approach to chairman tenure to help the Company manage succession planning, whilst at the same time still address the need for regular refreshment and diversity.
The AIC Code is available on the AIC website (www.theaic.co.uk). It includes an explanation of how the AIC Code adapts the Principles and Provisions set out in the UK Code to make them relevant for investment companies.
In order to assist the board in fulfilling its governance responsibilities, it has delegated certain functions to committees. The roles and responsibilities of these committees, together with details of work undertaken during the year under review, are outlined over the next few pages.
The reports of the Audit and Risk Committee, Nomination Committee, Remuneration Committee and Management Engagement Committee are incorporated and form part of the Directors' Report.
The Company carries on business as an investment trust. Its shares are listed and admitted to trading on the premium segment of the main market of the London Stock Exchange. It has been approved by HM Revenue & Customs as an investment trust in accordance with section 1158 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010, by way of a one-off application and it is intended that the Company will continue to conduct its affairs in a manner which will enable it to retain this status.
The Company is domiciled in the UK and is an investment company within the meaning of section 833 of the Companies Act 2006. The Company is not a "close" company for taxation purposes.
It is not intended that the Company should have a limited life but the directors consider it desirable that the shareholders should have the opportunity to review the future of the Company at appropriate intervals. Accordingly, the articles of association contain provisions requiring the directors to put a proposal for the continuation of the Company to shareholders at the Annual General Meeting ("AGM") in 2025 and thereafter at five yearly intervals.
As at 9 November 2022, the Company had 69,463,343 ordinary shares of 10 pence each in issue. No shares are held in treasury. Accordingly, the total number of voting rights in the Company at the date of this report is 69,463,343. Details of changes to the Company's share capital during the year under review are given in note 13 to the accounts on page 48.
The Company has received notifications in accordance with the Financial Conduct Authority's ("FCA") Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rule 5.1.2R of the following interests in 3% or more of the voting rights attached to the Company's issued share capital.
| As at 31 August |
% of total 2022 voting rights |
|
|---|---|---|
| Charles Stanley & Co. Limited | 3,446,355 | 4.98 |
There have been no notified changes to the above holdings since the year end.
The directors at the date of approval of this report confirm that, so far as each of them is aware, there is no relevant audit information of which the Company's auditor is unaware; and each director has taken all the steps that he or she ought to have taken as a director in order to make himself or herself aware of any relevant audit information and to establish that the Company's auditor is aware of that information.
The number of scheduled and ad hoc meetings of the board and its committees held during the financial year, and the attendance of individual directors, is shown below. Whenever possible all directors attend the AGM.
| Audit | Manage- ment and Risk Engagement Nomination Remuneration Board Committee Committee Committee |
Committee | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bridget Guerin | 5/5 | 2/2 | 1/1 | 2/2 | 1/1 |
| Ewen Cameron Watt | 5/5 | 2/2 | 1/1 | 2/2 | 1/1 |
| Fraser McIntyre | 5/5 | 2/2 | 1/1 | 2/2 | 1/1 |
| Victoria Muir | 5/5 | 2/2 | 1/1 | 2/2 | 1/1 |
The board is satisfied that the Chairman and each of the other non-executive directors commits sufficient time to the affairs of the Company to fulfil their duties.
Directors' and officers' liability insurance cover was in place for the directors throughout the year. The Company's articles of association provide, subject to the provisions of UK legislation, an indemnity for directors in respect of costs which they may incur relating to the defence of any proceedings brought against them arising out of their positions as directors, in which they are acquitted or judgment is given in their favour by the court. This is a qualifying third party indemnity provision and was in place throughout the year under review and to the date of this report.
By order of the board
Company Secretary 9 November 2022

The responsibilities and work carried out by the Audit and Risk Committee during the year under review are set out in the following report. The duties and responsibilities of the committee, which include monitoring the integrity of the Company's financial reporting and internal controls, are set out in further detail below, and may be found in the terms of reference which are set out on the Company's webpages, www.schroders.co.uk/incomegrowth.
All directors are members of the committee. Fraser McIntyre is the chairman of the committee. The board has satisfied itself that at least one of the committee's members has recent and relevant financial experience and that the committee as a whole has competence relevant to the sector in which the company operates.

The below table sets out how the committee discharged its duties during the year. The committee met twice during the year. Further details on attendance can be found on page 23. An evaluation of the committee's effectiveness and review of its terms of reference was completed during the year.
| Application during the year | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risks and Internal Controls | Financial Reports and Valuation | Audit | ||
| Service provider controls Reviewing the operational controls maintained by the Manager, depositary and registrar. |
Recognition of investment income Considered dividends received against forecast and the allocation of special dividends to income or capital. |
Effectiveness of the independent audit process and auditor performance Evaluated the effectiveness of the independent audit firm and process prior to making a recommendation that it should be re-appointed at the forthcoming AGM. Evaluated the auditor's performance against agreed criteria including: qualification; knowledge, expertise and resources; independence policies; effectiveness of audit planning; adherence to auditing standards; and overall competence was considered, alongside feedback from the Manager on the audit process. Professional scepticism of the auditor was questioned and the committee was satisfied with the auditor's replies. |
| Application during the year | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risks and Internal Controls | Financial Reports and Valuation | Audit | ||
| Internal controls and risk management Consideration of several key aspects of internal control and risk management operating within the Manager, depositary and registrar, including assurance reports and presentations on these controls. |
Calculation of the investment management fee Consideration of methodology used to calculate the fees, matched against the criteria set out in the AIFM agreement. |
Auditor independence Ernst & Young LLP has provided audit services to the Company since it was appointed on 17 May 2019. The auditors are required to rotate the senior statutory auditor every five years. There are no contractual obligations restricting the choice of external auditors. This is the third year that the senior statutory auditor, Matthew Price has conducted the audit of the Company's financial statements. |
||
| Compliance with the investment trust qualifying rules in S1158 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010 Consideration of the Manager's report confirming compliance. |
Overall accuracy of the annual report and accounts Consideration of the draft annual report and accounts and the letter from the Manager in support of the letter of representation to the auditor. |
Audit results Met with and reviewed a comprehensive report from the auditor which detailed the results of the audit, compliance with regulatory requirements, safeguards that have been established, and on their own internal quality control procedures. |
||
| Principal risks Reviewing the principal risks faced by the Company and the system of internal control. |
Valuation and existence of holdings Quarterly review of portfolio holdings and assurance reports. |
Meetings with the auditor Met the auditors without representatives of the Manager present. Representatives of the auditors attended the committee meeting at which the draft annual report and accounts was considered. |
||
| Fair, balanced and understandable Reviewed the annual report and accounts to ensure that it was fair, balanced and understandable. |
Provision of non-audit services by the auditor The committee has reviewed the FRC's Guidance on Audit Committees and has formulated a policy on the provision of non-audit services by the Company's auditor. The committee has determined that the Company's appointed auditor will not be considered for the provision of certain non-audit services, such as accounting and preparation of the financial statements, internal audit and custody. The auditor may, if required, provide other non-audit services which will be judged on a case-by-case basis. The auditor did not provide any non audit services to the Company during the year. |
|||
| Going concern and viability Reviewing the impact of risks on going concern and longer-term viability. |
Consent to continue as auditor Ernst & Young LLP indicated to the committee their willingness to continue to act as auditor. |
The committee recommended that the board approve the report and accounts.
The committee recommended that the going concern assumption be adopted in the report and accounts and the explanations set out in the viability statement.
As a result of the work performed, the committee has concluded that the report for the period ended 31 August 2022, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable and provides the information necessary for shareholders to assess the Company's position, performance, business model and strategy, and has reported on these findings to the board. The board's conclusions in this respect are set out in the Statement of Directors' Responsibilities on page 32.
Having reviewed the performance of the auditors as described above, the committee considered it appropriate to recommend the firm's reappointment. Resolutions to re-appoint Ernst & Young LLP as auditor to the Company, and to authorise the directors to determine their remuneration will be proposed at the AGM.
Chairman of the Audit and Risk Committee
9 November 2022
The Management Engagement Committee is responsible for (1) the monitoring and oversight of the Manager's performance and fees, and confirming the Manager's ongoing suitability, and (2) reviewing and assessing the Company's other service providers, including reviewing their fees. All directors are members of the committee. Bridget Guerin is the chairman of the committee. Its terms of reference are available on the Company's webpages, www.schroders.co.uk/incomegrowth.
| Approach | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oversight of the Manager | Oversight of other service providers | |||
| The committee: • reviews the Manager's performance, over the short and long-term, against the reference index, peer group and the market. • considers the reporting it has received from the Manager throughout the year, and the reporting from the Manager to the shareholders. • assesses management fees on an absolute and relative basis, receiving input from the Company's broker, including peer group and industry figures, as well as the structure of the fees. • reviews the appropriateness of the Manager's contract, including terms such as notice period. • assesses whether the Company receives appropriate administrative, accounting, company secretarial and marketing support from the Manager. |
The committee reviews the performance and competitiveness of the following service providers on at least an annual basis: • Depositary and custodian • Corporate broker • Registrars • Lender The committee also receives a report from the Company Secretary on ancillary service providers, and considers any recommendations. The committee noted the Audit and Risk Committee's review of the auditor. |
|||
Application during the year
The committee undertook a detailed review of the Manager's performance and agreed that it has the appropriate depth and quality of resource to deliver superior returns over the longer term.
The committee also reviewed the terms of the AIFM agreement and agreed they remained fit for purpose. The committee engaged with the Manager and secured a reduction in the AIFM fee rate during the year.
The committee reviewed the other services provided by the Manager and agreed they were satisfactory.
The annual review of each of the service providers was satisfactory.
The committee noted that the Audit and Risk Committee had undertaken a detailed evaluation of the Manager, registrar, and depositary and custodian's internal controls.
The Nomination Committee is responsible for (1) the recruitment, selection and induction of directors, (2) their assessment during their tenure, and (3) the board's succession. All directors are members of the committee. Ewen Cameron Watt is the chairman of the committee. Its terms of reference are available on the Company's webpages, www.schroders.co.uk/incomegrowth.

| Approach | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selection and induction | Board evaluation | Succession | ||
| • Committee prepares a job specification for each role, which is shared with an independent recruitment firm. For the Chairman and the chairs of committees, the committee also considers current board members. • Job specification outlines the knowledge, professional skills, personal qualities and experience requirements. • Potential candidates are assessed against the Company's diversity policy. • Committee discusses the long list, invites a number of candidates for interview and makes a recommendation to the board. • Committee reviews the induction and training of new directors. |
• Committee assesses each director annually and considers whether an external evaluation should take place. • Evaluation focuses on whether each director continues to demonstrate commitment to their role and provides a valuable contribution to the board during the year, taking into account time commitment, independence, conflicts and training needs. • Following the evaluation, the committee provides a recommendation to shareholders with respect to the annual re-election of directors at the AGM. • All directors retire at the AGM and their re-election is subject to shareholder approval. |
• Having considered diversity, the need for regular refreshment and orderly succession, the board's policy is that directors' tenure will be for no longer than nine years, with the exception of the Chairman, who should not serve longer than 12 years, in ordinary circumstances and that each director will be subject to annual re-election at the AGM. • Committee reviews the board's current and future needs at least annually. Should any need be identified the committee will initiate the selection process. • Committee oversees the handover process for retiring directors. |
||
| For application see page 28 |
| Application during the year | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selection and induction | Board evaluation | Succession | ||
| • The committee prepared a job specification for the independent non executive director role. The job specification outlined the knowledge, professional skills, personal qualities and experience requirements, with potential candidates to be assessed against the Company's diversity policy. • A recruitment firm was chosen following a rigorous selection process. • The committee shared the job specification with independent recruitment firm, Cornforth Consulting Limited who have no other connections with the company or individual directors. • The committee was presented |
• The board evaluation was undertaken in August 2022. • The committee also reviewed each director's time commitment and independence to ensure that each director remained free from conflict and had sufficient time available to discharge each of their duties effectively. The committee considered each director's contributions, and noted that in addition to extensive experience as professionals and non-executive directors, each director had valuable skills and experience, as detailed in their biographies on pages 19 and 20. All directors were considered to be independent in character and judgement. • Based on its assessment, the committee provided individual recommendations for each director's re-election. |
• The committee reviewed the succession policy and agreed it was still fit for purpose. • The committee have considered the need for succession and Mrs Guerin will retire from the board at the upcoming AGM. Mr Cameron Watt will be appointed as Chairman and stand for re-election at the upcoming AGM. • The committee appointed Ms Muir as senior independent director following the AGM. |
||
| with the long list of candidates and invited them for interview. This list was narrowed and then invited for a second interview and recommendation to the board. |
• That all directors continue to demonstrate commitment to their roles, provide a valuable contribution to the deliberations of the board, contribute towards the Company's long-term success, and remain free from conflicts with the Company and its directors, so should all be recommended for re-election by shareholders at the AGM, except Mrs Guerin who will not put herself forward for re-election.
The Remuneration Committee is responsible for the making recommendations to the board about the remuneration of the directors. All directors are members of the committee. Victoria Muir is the chairman of the committee. Its terms of reference are available on the Company's webpages, www.schroders.co.uk/incomegrowth.
| Approach | Application during the year |
|---|---|
| The committee determines and agrees with the board the framework or broad policy for the remuneration of the directors. The objective of the policy shall be to ensure that members of the board are, in a fair and responsible manner, rewarded for their individual contributions to the success of the Company. No director shall be involved in any decisions as to their own remuneration outcome. |
The remuneration framework, as set out in the Directors' Remuneration Report, was unchanged during the year. |
| The committee reviews the ongoing appropriateness and relevance of the remuneration policy. |
The committee concluded that the remuneration policy remained appropriate and relevant. |
| The committee reviews director remuneration annually and make recommendations on the fees paid to non-executive directors in light of directors' workloads, levels of responsibility and industry norms. |
The committee reviewed directors' fees, using external benchmarking, and determined they remained appropriate. |
| The committee ensures that each year the Remuneration Report is put to shareholders for approval as an advisory vote at the AGM, and the Remuneration Policy is put to shareholders for approval every three years at the AGM. |
The Remuneration Report will be put to shareholders for approval at the forthcoming Annual General Meeting. The Remuneration Policy is next due to be put to shareholders in 2023. |
Recommendations made to, and approved by, the board:
The following remuneration policy is currently in force and is subject to a binding vote every three years. The shareholders approved the Directors' Remuneration Policy at the 2020 AGM and the current policy provisions will apply until the policy is next considered by shareholders at the 2023 AGM. Additionally, an ordinary resolution to approve this report will be put to shareholders at the forthcoming AGM.
At the AGM held on 17 December 2020, 98.33% of the votes cast (including votes cast at the Chairman's discretion) in respect of approval of the Directors' Remuneration Policy were in favour while 1.67% were against. 80,492 votes were withheld.
At the AGM held on 16 December 2021, 98.72% of the votes cast (including votes cast at the Chairman's discretion) in respect of approval of the Directors' Remuneration Report for the year ended 31 August 2021 were in favour, while 1.28% were against. 71,486 votes were withheld.
The determination of the directors' fees is the responsibility of the Remuneration Committee, which makes recommendations to the board.
It is the Remuneration Committee's policy to determine the level of directors' remuneration having regard to amounts payable to non-executive directors in the industry generally, the role that individual directors fulfil in respect of board and committee responsibilities, and time committed to the Company's affairs, taking into account the aggregate limit of fees set out in the Company's articles of association. This aggregate level of directors' fees is currently set at £150,000.
per annum and any increase in this level requires approval by the board and the Company's shareholders. The Chairman of the board and the chairman of the Audit and Risk Committee each receives fees at a higher rate than the other directors to reflect their additional responsibilities. Directors' fees are set at a level to recruit and retain individuals of sufficient calibre, with the level of knowledge, experience and expertise necessary to promote the success of the Company in reaching its short and long-term strategic objectives.
Any director who performs services which in the opinion of the directors are outside the scope of the ordinary duties of a director, may be paid additional remuneration to be determined by the directors, subject to the previously mentioned fee cap.
The board and its committees exclusively comprise nonexecutive directors. No director past or present has an entitlement to a pension from the Company and the Company has not, and does not intend to, operate a share scheme for directors or to award any share options or long-term performance incentives to any director. No director has a service contract with the Company, although directors have a letter of appointment. Directors do not receive exit payments and are not provided with any compensation for loss of office. No other payments are made to directors other than the reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending to the Company's business.
The following amounts were paid by the Company to directors for their services in respect of the year ended 31 August 2022 and the preceding financial year. Directors' remuneration is all fixed; they do not receive any variable remuneration. The performance of the Company over the financial year is presented on page 2, under the heading "Financial highlights".
| Fees | Taxable benefits1 | Total | Change in annual fee over years ended 31 August |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
| Director | £ | £ | £ | £ | £ | £ | % | % | % |
| Bridget Guerin (Chairman) | 36,000 | 34,000 | 253 | – | 36,253 | 34,000 | 6.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Ewen Cameron Watt | 26,000 | 24,000 | 157 | – | 26,157 | 24,000 | 9.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| David Causer2 | – | 8,601 | – | 1,043 | – | 9,644 | n/a | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Fraser McIntyre | 31,000 | 27,539 | 116 | 106 | 31,116 | 27,645 | 12.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Victoria Muir | 26,000 | 24,000 | – | – | 26,000 | 24,000 | 8.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Total | 119,000 | 118,140 | 526 | 1,149 | 119,526 | 119,289 |
1 Comprise amounts reimbursed for expenses incurred in carrying out business for the Company, and which have been grossed up to include PAYE and NI contributions.
2 Retired from the board on 17 December 2020.
The information in the above table has been audited.
The terms of directors' letters of appointment are available for inspection at the Company's registered office address during normal business hours and during the AGM at the location of such meeting, subject to COVID-19 restrictions. During such restrictions, interested parties are invited to email the Company Secretary on [email protected] to arrange access to these.
The board did not consult with any individual shareholders before setting this remuneration policy, although feedback from the Company's Manager and corporate broker on shareholder views was considered. Any specific comments on the policy received from shareholders would be considered on a case-by-case basis.
As the Company does not have any employees, no employee pay and employment conditions were taken into account when setting this remuneration policy and no employees were consulted in its construction.
Directors' fees are reviewed annually and take into account research from third parties on the fee levels of directors of peer group companies, as well as industry norms and factors affecting the time commitment expected of the directors. New directors are subject to the provisions set out in this remuneration policy.
This report sets out how the remuneration policy was implemented during the year ended 31 August 2022.
Directors' remuneration was last reviewed by the Remuneration Committee in November 2021. The members of the committee and board at the time that remuneration levels were considered were as set out on pages 19 and 20. Although no external advice was sought in considering the levels of directors' fees, information on fees paid to directors of other investment trusts managed by Schroders and peer group companies provided by the Manager and corporate broker was taken into consideration.
The table below compares the remuneration payable to directors to distributions paid to shareholders during the year under review and the prior financial year. In considering these figures, shareholders should take into account the Company's investment objectives.
| Year ended 31 August 2022 £'000 |
Year ended 31 August 2021 £'000 |
% change |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Remuneration payable to directors |
120 | 119 | 0.8 |
| Distributions – dividends for the year |
9,170 | 8,883 | 3.2 |
A graph showing the Company's share price total return compared with the FTSE All-Share Index total return, over the last ten years, is set out below. The FTSE All-Share Index has been selected as an appropriate comparison based on the composition of the Company's investment portfolio.

The Company's articles of association do not require directors to own shares in the Company. The interests of directors, including those of connected persons, at the beginning and end of the financial year under review are set out below.
| At 31 August 2022 |
At 1 September 2021 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Bridget Guerin | 18,852 | 18,852 |
| Ewen Cameron Watt | 10,000 | 10,000 |
| Fraser McIntyre | 7,704 | 7,419 |
| Victoria Muir | 3,500 | 3,500 |
The information in the above table has been audited. Since the year end Mr Cameron Watt has purchased 3,000 shares in the Company.
Chairman of the Remuneration Committee
9 November 2022
The directors are responsible for preparing the annual report, and the financial statements in accordance with applicable law and regulation.
Company law requires the directors to prepare financial statements for each financial year. Under that law the directors have prepared the financial statements in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (United Kingdom Accounting Standards and applicable law). Under company law the directors must not approve the financial statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Company and of the return or loss of the Company for that period. In preparing these financial statements, the directors are required to:
The directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the Company's transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the Company and enable them to ensure that the financial statements and the Directors' Remuneration Report comply with the Companies Act 2006.
The directors are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the Company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.
The Manager is responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the Company's webpages. Legislation in the United Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.
The directors consider that the annual report and accounts, taken as a whole, are fair, balanced and understandable and provide the information necessary for shareholders to assess the Company's position and performance, business model and strategy.
Each of the directors, whose names and functions are listed on pages 19 and 20, confirm that to the best of their knowledge:
By order of the board
9 November 2022
We have audited the financial statements of Schroder Income Growth Fund plc ("The Company") for the year ended 31 August 2022 which Income Statement, Statement of Changes in Equity, Statement of Financial Position, and the related notes 1 to 20, including a summary of significant accounting policies. The financial reporting framework that has been applied in their preparation is applicable law and United Kingdom Accounting Standards including FRS 102 'The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland' (United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice).
In our opinion, the financial statements:
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (ISAs (UK)) and applicable law. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor's responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements section of our report. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
We are independent of the company in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements in the UK, including the FRC's Ethical Standard as applied to listed public interest entities, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements.
The non-audit services prohibited by the FRC's Ethical Standard were not provided to the company and we remain independent of Company in conducting the audit.
In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that the directors' use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial statements is appropriate. Our evaluation of the directors' assessment of the Company's ability to continue to adopt the going concern basis of accounting will include the following procedures:
Based on the work we have performed, we have not identified any material uncertainties relating to events or conditions that, individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt on the Company's ability to continue as a going concern for a period covered by the directors to 30 November 2023, which is at least 12 months from when the financial statements are authorised for issue.
In relation to the Company's reporting on how they have applied the UK Corporate Governance Code, we have nothing material to add or draw attention to in relation to the directors' statement in the financial statements about whether the directors considered it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of accounting.
Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the directors with respect to going concern are described in the relevant sections of this report. However, because not all future events or conditions can be predicted, this statement is not a guarantee as to the company's ability to continue as a going concern.
| Key audit matters | ||
|---|---|---|
| – | Risk of incomplete or inaccurate revenue recognition, including the classification of special dividends as revenue or capital items in the Income Statement |
|
| – | Risk of incorrect valuation or ownership of the investment portfolio | |
| Materiality | ||
| – | Overall materiality of £2.05m which represents 1% of shareholders' funds. |
Our assessment of audit risk, our evaluation of materiality and our allocation of performance materiality determine our audit scope for the company. This enables us to form an opinion on the financial statements. We take into account size, risk profile, the organisation of the company and effectiveness of controls, including controls and changes in the business environment when assessing the level of work to be performed. All audit work was performed directly by the audit engagement team.
There has been increasing interest from stakeholders as to how climate change will impact companies. The Company has determined that the impact of climate change could affect the Company's investments and the overall investment process. This is explained in the principal risks section on page 18 and which forms part of the "Other information," rather than the audited financial statements. Our procedures on these disclosures therefore consisted solely of considering whether they are materially inconsistent with the financial statements, or our knowledge obtained in the course of the audit or otherwise appear to be materially misstated.
Our audit effort in considering climate change was focused on the adequacy of the Company's disclosures in the financial statements as set out in note 1(a) and conclusion that there was no material impact of climate change on the valuation of the investments. We also challenged the directors' considerations of climate change in their assessment of going concern and viability and associated disclosures.
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in our audit of the financial statements of the current period and include the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due to fraud) that we identified. These matters included those which had the greatest effect on: the overall audit strategy, the allocation of resources in the audit; and directing the efforts of the engagement team. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.
| Risk | Our response to the risk | Key observations communicated to the Audit and Risk Committee |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Incomplete or inaccurate revenue recognition, including the classification of special dividends as revenue or capital items in the Income Statement |
We performed the following procedures: We obtained an understanding of the Manager's and Administrator's processes and controls surrounding revenue |
The results of our procedures identified no material misstatements in relation to the risk of incomplete or inaccurate |
||
| As Described in the Audit and Risk Committee Report (page 24); Accounting policies (page 42); |
recognition and classification of special dividends by performing walkthrough procedures. |
revenue recognition, including classification of special dividends as revenue or capital items in the Income Statement. |
||
| The total revenue for the year to 31 August 2022 was £10.96 million (2021: £9.43 million), consisting primarily of dividend income from listed equity investments. |
For all dividends received, we recalculated the dividend income by multiplying the investment holdings at the ex-dividend date, traced from the accounting records, |
|||
| The Company received special dividends amounting to £2.20 million (2021: £2.70 million). Of which £0.50 million was classed as revenue (2021: £0.87 million), and £1.71 million (2021: £1.83 million) was classed as capital. |
by the dividend per share, which was agreed to an independent data vendor. We also agreed all exchange rates to an external source where applicable and, for a sample of dividends received, we agreed the amounts to bank statements |
|||
| To test completeness of recorded income, we verified that dividends had been |
| Risk | ||
|---|---|---|
communicated to the Audit and Risk Committee
The investment income receivable by the Company during the year directly affects the Company's revenue return. There is a risk of incomplete or inaccurate recognition of revenue through the failure to recognise proper income entitlements or to apply an appropriate accounting treatment.
The directors may be required to exercise judgement in determining whether income receivable in the form of special dividends should be classified as 'revenue' or 'capital' in the Income Statement
recorded for each investee company held during the year with reference to investee company announcements obtained from an independent data vendor.
For all accrued dividends, we reviewed the investee company announcements to assess whether the entitlement arose prior to 31 August 2022. We agreed the dividend rate to corresponding announcements made by the investee company recalculated the amount receivable and agreed the subsequent cash receipts to post-year end bank statements.
We performed a review of the income and acquisition and disposal reports produced by the Administrator to identify all special dividends received and accrued. The Company received 3 special dividends above our testing threshold. For these dividends, we assessed that the classification of either revenue or capital for the payments was consistent with the underlying motives and circumstances for the special dividends.
As described in the Audit and Risk Committee's Report (page 24); Accounting policies (page 42).
The valuation of the investment portfolio at 31 August 2022 was £230.50 million (2021: £234.81 million) consisting entirely of listed equities.
The valuation of investments held in the investment portfolio is the key driver of the Company's net asset value and total return. Incorrect investment pricing, or failure to maintain proper legal title of the investments held by the Company, could have a significant impact on the portfolio valuation and the return generated for shareholders.
The fair value of listed investments is determined using quoted market bid prices at close of business on the reporting date.
We obtained an understanding of the Administrator's processes and controls surrounding investment valuation and legal title by performing walkthrough procedures.
For all listed investments in the portfolio, we compared the market prices and exchange rates applied to an independent pricing vendor and recalculated the investment valuations as at the year end.
We inspected a stale pricing report to determine whether there were any stale prices at year end, to identify prices that have not changed one week before and after the year end and verified whether the listed price is a valid fair value.
We compared the Company's investment holdings at 31 August 2022 to independent confirmations received directly from the Company's Custodian and Depositary.
The results of our procedures identified no material misstatements in relation to the risk of incorrect valuation or ownership of the investment portfolio.
There have been no changes to the areas of audit focus raised in the above risk table from the prior year.
We apply the concept of materiality in planning and performing the audit, in evaluating the effect of identified misstatements on the audit and in forming our audit opinion.
The magnitude of an omission or misstatement that, individually or in the aggregate, could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of the users of the financial statements. Materiality provides a basis for determining the nature and extent of our audit procedures.

We determined materiality for the company to be £2.05m (2021: £2.20m), which is 1% (2021: 1%) of shareholders' funds. We believe that shareholders' funds provides us with materiality aligned to the key measure of the Company's performance.
The application of materiality at the individual account or balance level. It is set at an amount to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability that the aggregate of uncorrected and undetected misstatements exceeds materiality.
On the basis of our risk assessments, together with our assessment of the company's overall control environment, our judgement was that performance materiality was 75% (2021: 75%) of our planning materiality, namely £1.54m (2021: £1.65m). We have set performance materiality at this percentage due to our past experience of working with the key service providers which therefore indicates a lower risk of misstatements, both corrected and uncorrected.
Given the importance of the distinction between revenue and capital for investment trusts, we have also applied a separate testing threshold for the revenue column of the Income Statement which is calculated as 5% of net revenue before tax. We determined this to be £0.49m (2021: £0.42m).
An amount below which identified misstatements are considered as being clearly trivial.
We agreed with the Audit and Risk Committee that we would report to them all uncorrected audit differences in excess of £0.10m (2021: £0.11m), which is set at 5% of planning materiality, as well as differences below that threshold that, in our view, warranted reporting on qualitative grounds.
We evaluate any uncorrected misstatements against both the quantitative measures of materiality discussed above and in light of other relevant qualitative considerations in forming our opinion.
The other information comprises the information included in the annual report other than the financial statements and our auditor's report thereon. The directors are responsible for the other information contained within the annual report.
Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and, except to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in this report, we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
Our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the course of the audit or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If we identify such material inconsistencies or apparent material misstatements, we are required to determine whether this gives rise to a material misstatement in the financial statements themselves. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of the other information, we are required to report that fact.
We have nothing to report in this regard.
In our opinion the part of the directors' remuneration report to be audited has been properly prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 2006.
In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of the audit:
In the light of the knowledge and understanding of the Company and its environment obtained in the course of the audit, we have not identified material misstatements in the strategic report or directors' report.
We have nothing to report in respect of the following matters in relation to which the Companies Act 2006 requires us to report to you if, in our opinion:
We have reviewed the directors' statement in relation to going concern, longer-term viability and that part of the Corporate Governance Statement relating to the company's compliance with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code specified for our review by the Listing Rules.
Based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we have concluded that each of the following elements of the Corporate Governance Statement is materially consistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained during the audit:
As explained more fully in the directors' responsibilities statement set out on page 32, the directors are responsible for the preparation of the financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view, and for such internal control as the directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements, the directors are responsible for assessing the Company's ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the directors either intend to liquidate the Company or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor's report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.
Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations. We design procedures in line with our responsibilities, outlined above, to detect irregularities, including fraud. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement due to fraud is higher than the risk of not detecting one resulting from error, as fraud may involve deliberate concealment by, for example, forgery or intentional misrepresentations, or through collusion. The extent to which our procedures are capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud is detailed below.
However, the primary responsibility for the prevention and detection of fraud rests with both those charged with governance of the company and management.
– Based on this understanding we designed our audit procedures to identify non-compliance with such laws and regulations. Our procedures involved review of the Company Secretary's reporting to the directors with respect to the application of the documented policies and procedures and review of the financial statements to ensure compliance with the reporting requirements of the Company.
A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements is located on the Financial Reporting Council's website at https://www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms part of our auditor's report.
– Following the recommendation from the Audit and Risk committee, we were appointed by the Company on 5 July 2019 to audit the financial statements for the year ending 31 August 2019 and subsequent financial periods.
The period of total uninterrupted engagement including previous renewals and reappointments is four years, covering the years ending 31 August 2019 to 31 August 2022.
– The audit opinion is consistent with the additional report to the Audit and Risk Committee.
This report is made solely to the company's members, as a body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the Company's members those matters we are required to state to them in an auditor's report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the Company and the Company's members as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.
Matthew Price (Senior statutory auditor) for and on behalf of Ernst & Young LLP, Statutory Auditor London
9 November 2022
| Note | Revenue £'000 |
2022 Capital £'000 |
£'000 | Total Revenue £'000 |
2021 Capital £'000 |
Total £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Losses)/gains on investments held at fair value through profit or loss |
2 | – | (16,596) | (16,596) | – | 47,565 | 47,565 |
| Net foreign currency (losses)/gains | – | (1) | (1) | – | 5 | 5 | |
| Income from investments | 3 | 10,954 | 1,707 | 12,661 | 9,432 | 1,832 | 11,264 |
| Other interest receivable and similar income | 3 | 8 | – | 8 | – | – | – |
| Gross return/(loss) | 10,962 | (14,890) | (3,928) | 9,432 | 49,402 | 58,834 | |
| Investment management fee | 4 | (527) | (527) | (1,054) | (592) | (592) | (1,184) |
| Administrative expenses | 5 | (523) | – | (523) | (382) | – | (382) |
| Net return/(loss) before finance costs | |||||||
| and taxation | 9,912 | (15,417) | (5,505) | 8,458 | 48,810 | 57,268 | |
| Finance costs | 6 | (202) | (202) | (404) | (88) | (88) | (176) |
| Net return/(loss) before taxation | 9,710 | (15,619) | (5,909) | 8,370 | 48,722 | 57,092 | |
| Taxation | 7 | (13) | – | (13) | – | – | – |
| Net return/(loss) after taxation | 9,697 | (15,619) | (5,922) | 8,370 | 48,722 | 57,092 | |
| Return/(loss) per share | 9 | 13.96p | (22.49)p | (8.53)p | 12.08p | 70.33p | 82.41p |
The "Total" column of this statement is the profit and loss account of the Company. The "Revenue" and "Capital" columns represent supplementary information prepared under guidance issued by The Association of Investment Companies. The Company has no other items of other comprehensive income, and therefore the net return after taxation is also the total comprehensive income for the year.
All revenue and capital items in the above statement derive from continuing operations. No operations were acquired or discontinued in the year.
The notes on pages 42 to 54 form an integral part of these accounts.

| Note | Called-up share capital £'000 |
premium £'000 |
Capital Share redemption reserve £'000 |
Warrant exercise reserve £'000 |
Share purchase reserves £'000 |
Capital reserves £'000 |
Revenue reserve £'000 |
Total £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At 31 August 2020 Issue of new shares Net return on ordinary activities |
6,904 42 – |
8,270 1,179 – |
2,011 – – |
1,596 – – |
34,936 – – |
105,137 – 48,722 |
11,470 – 8,370 |
170,324 1,221 57,092 |
|
| Dividends paid in the year At 31 August 2021 Net (loss)/return on ordinary activities Dividends paid in the year |
8 8 |
– 6,946 – – |
– 9,449 – – |
– 2,011 – – |
– 1,596 – – |
– 34,936 – – |
– 153,859 (15,619) – |
(8,722) 11,118 9,697 (8,893) |
(8,722) 219,915 (5,922) (8,893) |
| At 31 August 2022 | 6,946 | 9,449 | 2,011 | 1,596 | 34,936 | 138,240 | 11,922 | 205,100 |
The notes on pages 42 to 54 form an integral part of these accounts.
| Note | 2022 £'000 |
2021 £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed assets | |||
| Investments at fair value | 10 | 230,497 | 234,811 |
| Current assets | |||
| Debtors | 11 | 2,737 | 2,796 |
| Cash at bank and in hand | 2,305 | 7,718 | |
| 5,042 | 10,514 | ||
| Current liabilities | |||
| Creditors: amounts falling due within one year | 12 | (30,439) | (25,410) |
| Net current liabilities | (25,397) | (14,896) | |
| Total assets less current liabilities | 205,100 | 219,915 | |
| Net assets | 205,100 | 219,915 | |
| Capital and reserves | |||
| Called-up share capital | 13 | 6,946 | 6,946 |
| Share premium | 14 | 9,449 | 9,449 |
| Capital redemption reserve | 14 | 2,011 | 2,011 |
| Warrant exercise reserve | 14 | 1,596 | 1,596 |
| Share purchase reserve | 14 | 34,936 | 34,936 |
| Capital reserves | 14 | 138,240 | 153,859 |
| Revenue reserve | 14 | 11,922 | 11,118 |
| Total equity shareholders' funds | 205,100 | 219,915 | |
| Net asset value per share | 15 | 295.26p | 316.59p |
These accounts were approved and authorised for issue by the board of directors on 9 November 2022 and signed on its behalf by:
Chairman
The notes on pages 42 to 54 form an integral part of these accounts.
Registered in England and Wales as a public company limited by shares
Company registration number: 03008494
Schroder Income Growth Fund plc ("the Company") is registered in England and Wales as a public company limited by shares. The Company's registered office is 1 London Wall Place, London EC2Y 5AU.
The accounts are prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 2006, United Kingdom Accounting Standards, including Financial Reporting Standard (FRS) 102 "The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland", and with the Statement of Recommended Practice "Financial Statements of Investment Trust Companies and Venture Capital Trusts" (the "SORP") issued by the Association of Investment Companies in July 2022. All of the Company's operations are of a continuing nature.
In preparing these financial statements the directors have considered the impact of climate change risk as an emerging risk as set out on pages 16 and 17, and have concluded that it does not have a material impact on the Company's investments. In line with UK GAAP investments are valued at fair value, which for the Company are quoted prices for the investments in active markets at the Balance Sheet date and therefore reflect market participants view of climate change risk.
The accounts have been prepared on a going concern basis under the historical cost convention, as modified by the revaluation of investments and derivative financial instruments held at fair value through profit or loss. The directors believe that the Company has adequate resources to continue operating until 30 November 2023, which is at least 12 months from the date the financial statements were authorised for issue. In forming this opinion, the directors have taken into consideration: the controls and monitoring processes in place; the Company's low level of debt and other payables; the low level of operating expenses, comprising largely variable costs which would reduce pro rata in the event of a market downturn; and that the Company's assets comprise cash and readily realisable securities quoted in active markets. In forming this opinion, the directors have also considered any potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, other geopolitical events and climate change on going concern. Further details of directors' considerations regarding this are given in the Chairman's Statement, Portfolio Managers' Review, Going Concern Statement, Viability Statement and under the Emerging Risks and uncertainties heading on page 16.
The Company has not presented a statement of cash flows, as it is not required for an investment trust which meets certain conditions; in particular that substantially all of the Company's investments are highly liquid and carried at market value.
The accounts are presented in sterling and amounts have been rounded to the nearest thousand.
The accounting policies applied to these accounts are consistent with those applied in the accounts for the year ended 31 August 2021.
Other than the directors' assessment of going concern and the accounting treatment of special dividends, no significant judgements, estimates or assumptions have been required in the preparation of the accounts for the current or preceding financial year.
The Company's investments are classified as fair value through profit and loss in accordance with FRS 102. Upon initial recognition the investments are measured at the transaction price, excluding expenses incidental to purchase which are written off to capital at the time of acquisition. Subsequently the investments are valued at fair value, which are quoted bid prices for investments traded in active markets.
Investments that are unlisted or not actively traded are valued using a variety of techniques to determine their fair value; all such valuations are reviewed by both the AIFM's fair value pricing committee and by the directors.
All purchases and sales are accounted for on a trade date basis.
Gains and losses on sales of investments, and the management fee or finance costs allocated to capital, are included in the Income Statement and dealt with in capital reserves within "Gains and losses on sales of investments". Increases and decreases in the valuation of investments held at the year end, are included in the Income Statement and dealt with in capital reserves within "Investment holding gains and losses".
Foreign exchange gains and losses on cash and deposit balances are included in the Income Statement and in capital reserves within "Gains and losses on sales of investments".
Dividends receivable from equity shares are included in revenue on an ex-dividend basis except where, in the opinion of the board, the dividend is capital in nature, in which case it is included in capital.
Dividends from overseas companies are included gross of any withholding tax.
Where the Company has elected to receive scrip dividends in the form of additional shares rather than in cash, the amount of the cash dividend foregone is recognised in revenue. Any excess in the value of the shares received over the amount of the cash dividend is recognised in capital.
Deposit interest outstanding at the year end is calculated and accrued on a time apportionment basis using market rates of interest.
All expenses are accounted for on an accruals basis. Expenses are allocated wholly to revenue with the following exceptions:
Finance costs, including any premiums payable on settlement or redemption and direct issue costs, are accounted for on an accruals basis using the effective interest method in accordance with FRS 102.
Finance costs are allocated 50% to revenue and 50% to capital in line with the board's expected long-term split of revenue and capital return from the Company's investment portfolio.
Cash at bank and in hand may comprise cash and demand deposits which are readily convertible to a known amount of cash and are subject to insignificant risk of changes in value.
Other debtors and creditors do not carry any interest, are short-term in nature and are accordingly stated at nominal value, with debtors reduced by appropriate allowances for estimated irrecoverable amounts.
Bank loans and overdrafts are initially measured at fair value and subsequently at amortised cost. They are recorded at the proceeds received net of direct issue costs.
The tax charge for the year is based on amounts expected to be received or paid.
Deferred tax is accounted for in accordance with FRS 102.
Deferred tax is provided on all timing differences that have originated but not reversed by the accounting date.
Deferred tax liabilities are recognised for all taxable timing differences but deferred tax assets are only recognised to the extent that it is probable that taxable profits will be available against which those timing differences can be utilised.
Deferred tax is measured at the tax rate which is expected to apply in the periods in which the timing differences are expected to reverse, based on tax rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted at the accounting date and is measured on an undiscounted basis.
Expenses are disclosed inclusive of the related irrecoverable VAT.
In accordance with FRS 102, the Company is required to determine a functional currency, being the currency in which the Company predominantly operates. The board has determined that sterling is the Company's functional currency and the presentational currency of the accounts.
Transactions denominated in foreign currencies are converted at actual exchange rates as at the date of the transaction. Monetary assets, liabilities and investments held at fair value, denominated in foreign currencies at the year end are translated at the rates of exchange prevailing at the year end.
Dividends on equity shares are recognised as a deduction of equity when the liability to pay the dividends arises. Consequently, interim dividends are recognised when paid and final dividends when approved in the general meeting.
| 2022 £'000 |
2021 £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Gains on sales of investments based on historic cost | 6,923 | 12,533 |
| Amounts recognised in investment holding gains and losses in the previous year in respect of investments sold in the year |
(10,239) | 1,834 |
| (Losses)/gains on sales of investments based on the carrying value at the previous | ||
| balance sheet date | (3,316) | 14,367 |
| Net movement in investment holding gains and losses | (13,280) | 33,198 |
| (Losses)/gains on investments held at fair value through profit or loss | (16,596) | 47,565 |
| 2022 £'000 |
2021 £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Income from investments: | ||
| UK dividends | 9,406 | 8,196 |
| UK special dividends | 496 | 721 |
| Overseas dividends | 909 | 380 |
| Scrip dividends | 143 | 135 |
| 10,954 | 9,432 | |
| Other interest receivable and similar income: | ||
| Deposit interest | 8 | – |
| Underwriting commission | – | – |
| Other income | – | – |
| 8 | – | |
| Total income | 10,962 | 9,432 |
| Capital: | ||
| Special dividends allocated to capital | 1,707 | 1,832 |
| Revenue £'000 |
2022 Capital £'000 |
£'000 | Total Revenue £'000 |
2021 Capital £'000 |
Total £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Management fee | 527 | 527 | 1,054 | 592 | 592 | 1,184 |
The basis for calculating the management fee is set out in the Directors' Report on page 22.
| 2022 £'000 |
2021 £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Administration expenses | 350 | 235 |
| Directors' fees | 119 | 118 |
| Auditor's remuneration for the audit of the Company's financial statements1 | 54 | 29 |
| 523 | 382 |
1Includes £9,000 (2021: £5,000) irrecoverable VAT.
| Revenue £'000 |
2022 Capital £'000 |
£'000 | Total Revenue £'000 |
2021 Capital £'000 |
Total £'000 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interest on bank loans and overdrafts | 202 | 202 | 404 | 88 | 88 | 176 | |
| 7. | Taxation | ||||||
| 2022 £'000 |
2021 £'000 |
||||||
| (a) | Analysis of charge in the year: | ||||||
| Irrecoverable overseas tax | 13 | – | |||||
| Tax charge for the year | 13 | – |
The tax assessed for the year is higher (2021: lower) than the Company's applicable rate of corporation tax for the year of 19.0% (2021: 19.0%).
The factors affecting the current tax charge for the year are as follows:
| Revenue £'000 |
2022 Capital £'000 |
£'000 | Total Revenue £'000 |
2021 Capital £'000 |
Total £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net return/(loss) on ordinary activities before taxation | 9,710 | (15,619) | (5,909) | 8,370 | 48,722 | 57,092 |
| Net return/(loss) on ordinary activities before taxation multiplied by the Company's applicable rate of corporation tax for the year of 19.0% (2021: 19.0%) Effects of: |
1,845 | (2,968) | (1,123) | 1,590 | 9,257 | 10,847 |
| Capital loss/(return) on investments | – | 3,153 | 3,153 | – | (9,038) | (9,038) |
| Tax relief on overseas tax suffered | – | – | – | (4) | – | (4) |
| Income not chargeable to corporation tax | (1,978) | (324) | (2,302) | (1,726) | (348) | (2,074) |
| Unrelieved expenses | 133 | 139 | 272 | 140 | 129 | 269 |
| Irrecoverable overseas tax | 13 | – | 13 | – | – | – |
| Tax charge for the year | 13 | – | 13 | – | – | – |
The Company has an unrecognised deferred tax asset of £8,589,000 (2021: £8,229,000) based on a main rate of corporation tax of 25% (2021: 25%). In its 2021 budget, the UK government announced that the main rate of corporation tax (for all profits except ring fence profits) for the fiscal year beginning on 1 April 2023 would increase to 25%.
The deferred tax asset has arisen due to the cumulative excess of deductible expenses over taxable income. Given the composition of the Company's portfolio, it is not likely that this asset will be utilised in the foreseeable future and therefore no asset has been recognised in the accounts.
Given the Company's status as an Investment Trust Company, no provision has been made for deferred tax on any capital gains or losses arising on the revaluation or disposal of investments.
| 2022 £'000 |
2021 £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|
| (a) Dividends paid and declared |
||
| 2021 fourth interim dividend of 5.3p (2020: 5.1p) | 3,682 | 3,521 |
| First interim dividend of 2.5p (2021: 2.5p) | 1,737 | 1,732 |
| Second interim dividend of 2.5p (2021: 2.5p) | 1,737 | 1,732 |
| Third interim dividend of 2.5p (2021: 2.5p) | 1,737 | 1,737 |
| Total dividends paid in the year | 8,893 | 8,722 |
| 2022 £'000 |
2021 £'000 |
|
| Fourth interim dividend declared of 5.7p (2021: 5.3p) | 3,959 | 3,682 |
All dividends paid and declared to date have been paid, or will be paid, out of revenue profits.
The requirements of Section 1158 are considered on the basis of dividends declared in respect of the financial year as shown below. The revenue available for distribution by way of dividend for the year is £9,697,000 (2021: £8,370,000).
| 2022 £'000 |
2021 £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|
| First interim dividend of 2.5p (2021: 2.5p) | 1,737 | 1,732 |
| Second interim dividend of 2.5p (2021: 2.5p) | 1,737 | 1,732 |
| Third interim dividend of 2.5p (2021: 2.5p) | 1,737 | 1,737 |
| Fourth interim dividend of 5.7p (2021: 5.3p) | 3,959 | 3,682 |
| Total dividends of 13.2p (2021: 12.8p) per share | 9,170 | 8,883 |
| 2022 £'000 |
2021 £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Revenue return | 9,697 | 8,370 |
| Capital (loss)/return | (15,619) | 48,722 |
| Total (loss)/return | (5,922) | 57,092 |
| Weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue during the year | 69,463,343 | 69,279,644 |
| Revenue return per share | 13.96p | 12.08p |
| Capital (loss)/return per share | (22.49)p | 70.33p |
| Total (loss)/return per share | (8.53)p | 82.41p |
| 2022 £'000 |
2021 £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Opening book cost | 187,930 | 173,482 |
| Opening investment holding gains | 46,881 | 11,849 |
| Opening fair value | 234,811 | 185,331 |
| Analysis of transactions made during the year | ||
| Purchases at cost | 69,738 | 73,435 |
| Sales proceeds | (57,456) | (71,520) |
| (Losses)/gains on investments held at fair value | (16,596) | 47,565 |
| Closing fair value | 230,497 | 234,811 |
| Closing book cost | 207,135 | 187,930 |
| Closing investment holding gains | 23,362 | 46,881 |
| Closing fair value | 230,497 | 234,811 |
All investments are listed on a recognised stock exchange.
Sales proceeds amounting to £57,456,000 (2021: £71,520,000) were received from disposal of investments in the year. The book cost of these investments when they were purchased was £50,533,000 (2021: £58,987,000). These investments have been revalued over time and until they were sold any unrealised gains/losses were included in the fair value of the investments.
The following transaction costs, comprising stamp duty and brokerage commission were incurred during the year:
| 2022 £'000 |
2021 £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|
| On acquisitions | 352 | 379 |
| On disposals | 24 | 36 |
| 376 | 415 |
| 2022 £'000 |
2021 £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Dividends and interest receivable | 2,718 | 2,678 |
| Securities sold awaiting settlement | – | 85 |
| Taxation recoverable | 5 | 19 |
| Other debtors | 14 | 14 |
| 2,737 | 2,796 |
The directors consider that the carrying amount of debtors approximates to their fair value.
| 2022 £'000 |
2021 £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Bank loan Other creditors and accruals |
30,000 439 |
25,000 410 |
| 30,439 | 25,410 |
The bank loan comprises £30 million (2021: £25 million) drawn down on the Company's revolving credit facility with SMBC Bank International plc. The The facility was extended for a further 364 day period, effective 24 August 2022.
The facility is unsecured but is subject to covenants and restrictions which are customary for a facility of this nature, all of which have been complied with during the year. Further details of this facility are given in note 19(a)(i) on page 50.
The directors consider that the carrying amount of creditors falling due within one year approximates to their fair value.
| 2022 £'000 |
2021 £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Ordinary shares allotted, called-up and fully paid: Ordinary shares of 10p each |
||
| Opening balance of 69,463,343 (2021: 68,038,343) shares | 6,946 | 6,904 |
| Issue of nil (2021: 425,000) new shares | – | 42 |
| Total of 69,463,343 (2021: 69,463,343) shares | 6,946 | 6,946 |
| Capital reserves | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gains and | Investment | ||||||
| Capital | Warrant | Share | losses on | holding | |||
| premium1 | Share redemption reserve1 |
reserve1 | exercise purchase | sales of reserve2 investments2 |
gains and losses3 |
Revenue reserve4 |
|
| £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | £'000 | |
| Opening balance | 9,449 | 2,011 | 1,596 | 34,936 | 106,978 | 46,881 | 11,118 |
| Losses on sales of investments based on the | |||||||
| carrying value at the previous balance sheet date | – | – | – | – | (3,316) | – | – |
| Net movement in investment holding gains | |||||||
| and losses | – | – | – | – | – | (13,280) | – |
| Transfer on disposal of investments | – | – | – | – | 10,239 | (10,239) | – |
| Realised exchange loss on currency balances | – | – | – | – | (1) | – | – |
| Management fee and finance costs allocated | |||||||
| to capital | – | – | – | – | (729) | – | – |
| Special dividends allocated to capital | – | – | – | – | 1,707 | – | – |
| Dividends paid | – | – | – | – | – | – | (8,893) |
| Retained revenue for the year | – | – | – | – | – | – | 9,697 |
| Closing balance | 9,449 | 2,011 | 1,596 | 34,936 | 114,878 | 23,362 | 11,922 |
| Reserves | premium1 £'000 |
Capital Share redemption reserve1 £'000 |
Warrant reserve1 £'000 |
Share exercise purchase £'000 |
Gains and losses on sales of reserve2 investments2 £'000 |
Capital reserves Investment holding gains and losses3 £'000 |
Revenue reserve4 £'000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Opening balance | 8,270 | 2,011 | 1,596 | 34,936 | 93,288 | 11,849 | 11,470 |
| Gains on sales of investments based on the | |||||||
| carrying value at the previous balance sheet date | – | – | – | – | 14,367 | – | – |
| Net movement in investment holding gains | |||||||
| and losses | – | – | – | – | – | 33,198 | – |
| Transfer on disposal of investments | – | – | – | – | (1,834) | 1,834 | – |
| Realised exchange gains on currency balances | – | – | – | – | 5 | – | – |
| Issue of new shares | 1,179 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Management fee and finance costs allocated | |||||||
| to capital | – | – | – | – | (680) | – | – |
| Special dividends allocated to capital | – | – | – | – | 1,832 | – | – |
| Dividends paid | – | – | – | – | – | – | (8,722) |
| Retained revenue for the year | – | – | – | – | – | – | 8,370 |
| Closing balance | 9,449 | 2,011 | 1,596 | 34,936 | 106,978 | 46,881 | 11,118 |
The Company's Articles of Association permit dividend distributions out of realised capital profits.
1These reserves are not distributable.
2These are realised (distributable) capital reserves which may be used to repurchase the Company's own shares or distributed as dividends.
3This reserve comprises holding gains on liquid investments (which may be deemed to be realised) and other amounts which are unrealised. An analysis has not been made between those amounts that are realised (and may be distributed as dividends or used to repurchase the Company's own shares) and those that are unrealised.
4The revenue reserve may distributed as dividends or used to repurchase the Company's own shares.
| 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|
| Net assets attributable to shareholders (£'000) | 205,100 | 219,915 |
| Shares in issue at the year end | 69,463,343 | 69,463,343 |
| Net asset value per share | 295.26p | 316.59p |
Under the terms of the AlFM Agreement, the Manager is entitled to receive a management fee. Details of the basis of the calculation are given in the Directors' Report on page 22. Any investments in funds managed or advised by the Manager or any of its associated companies are excluded from the assets used for the purpose of the calculation and therefore incur no fee.
The management fee payable in respect of the year ended 31 August 2022 amounted to £1,054,000 (2021: £1,184,000) of which £259,000 (2021: £265,000) was outstanding at the year end. Effective from 1 March 2021, the Manager is entitled to receive a further fee of £150,000 per annum, plus VAT, to cover administration and company secretarial costs. The secretarial fee payable for the year amounted to £180,000 (2021: £90,000) including VAT, of which £45,000 (2021: £45,000) was outstanding at the year end.
No director of the Company served as a director of any member of the Schroder Group at any time during the year.

Details of the remuneration payable to directors are given in the Directors' Remuneration Report on page 30 and details of directors' shareholdings are given in in the Directors' Remuneration Report on page 30. Details of transactions with the Manager are given in note 16 above. There have been no other transactions with related parties during the year (2021: nil).
The Company's financial instruments within the scope of FRS 102 that are held at fair value comprise its investment portfolio.
FRS 102 requires financial instruments to be categorised into a hierarchy consisting of the three levels below.
Level 1 – valued using unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets.
Level 2 – valued using observable inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1.
Level 3 – valued using inputs that are unobservable.
Details of the valuation techniques used by the Company are given in note 1(b) on page 42.
At 31 August 2022, all investments in the Company's portfolio are categorised as Level 1 (2021: same).
The Company's objectives are set out on the inside front cover of this report. In pursuing these objectives, the Company is exposed to a variety of financial risks that could result in a reduction in the Company's net assets or a reduction in the profits available for dividends.
These financial risks include market risk (comprising interest rate risk and other price risk), liquidity risk and credit risk. The directors' policy for managing these risks is set out below. The board coordinates the Company's risk management policy. The Company has no significant direct exposure to foreign exchange risk on monetary items. The objectives, policies and processes for managing the risks and the methods used to measure the risks that are set out below, have not changed from those applying in the comparative year.
The Company's classes of financial instruments may comprise the following:
The fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument held by the Company may fluctuate because of changes in market prices. This market risk comprises two elements: interest rate risk and other price risk. Information to enable an evaluation of the nature and extent of these two elements of market risk is given in parts (i) and (ii) of this note, together with sensitivity analyses where appropriate. The board reviews and agrees policies for managing these risks and these policies have remained unchanged from those applying in the comparative year. The Manager assesses the exposure to market risk when making each investment decision and monitors the overall level of market risk on the whole of the investment portfolio on an ongoing basis.
Interest rate movements may affect the level of income receivable on cash deposits and the interest payable on variable rate borrowings when interest rates are re-set.
Liquidity and borrowings are managed with the aim of increasing returns to shareholders. The board's policy is to permit gearing up to 25% where gearing is defined as borrowings used for investment purposes, less cash, expressed as a percentage of net assets. Any amount drawn on the facility would normally be for a one month period, at the end of which the drawdown may be rolled over, adjusted or repaid, and the interest rate is re-set. These amounts have been included in the analysis below, although the exposure to interest rate changes is not significant as any drawings can be repaid at the end of the one month period under the terms of this flexible arrangement.
The Company has also arranged a £5m overdraft facility with HSBC Bank plc, but this was not utilised during the current or comparative year.
The exposure of financial assets and financial liabilities to floating interest rates, giving cash flow interest rate risk when rates are re-set, is shown below:
| 2022 £'000 |
2021 £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Exposure to floating interest rates: | ||
| Cash at bank and in hand | 2,305 | 7,718 |
| Creditors falling due within one year: bank loan | (30,000) | (25,000) |
| Total exposure | (27,695) | (17,282) |
Cash balances earn interest at a floating rate based on the Sterling Overnight Index Average (2021: LIBOR).
The Company extended its £32.5 million credit facility with SMBC Bank International plc for a further 364 day period, effective from 24 August 2022.
Interest payable is calculated at the aggregate of the compounded daily Risk Free Rate ("RFR"), plus a margin. Amounts are normally drawn down on the facility for a one month period, at the end of which it may be rolled over or adjusted. At 31 August 2022, the Company had drawn down £30 million (2021: £25 million), for a one month period at an interest rate of 2.52% (2021: 0.88%) per annum.
The above year end amounts are not representative of the exposure to interest rates during the current or comparative year as the level cash balances and drawings on the facility have fluctuated. The maximum and minimum exposure during the year was as follows:
| 2022 £'000 |
2021 £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Minimum debit interest rate exposure during the year – net debt | (17,972) | (11,240) |
| Maximum debit interest rate exposure during the year – net debt | (27,695) | (19,298) |
The following table illustrates the sensitivity of the return after taxation for the year and net assets to a 1.0% (2021: 1.0%) increase or decrease in interest rates in regards to the Company's monetary financial assets and financial liabilities. This level of change is considered to be a reasonable illustration based on observation of current market conditions. The sensitivity analysis is based on the Company's monetary financial instruments held at the balance sheet date which are exposed to interest rate movements, with all other variables held constant.
| 2022 | 2021 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0% increase in rate £'000 |
1.0% decrease in rate £'000 |
1.0% increase in rate £'000 |
1.0% decrease in rate £'000 |
|
| Income statement – return after taxation | ||||
| Revenue return | (127) | 127 | (48) | 48 |
| Capital return | (150) | 150 | (126) | 126 |
| Total return after taxation | (277) | 277 | (174) | 174 |
| Net assets | (277) | 277 | (174) | 174 |
Given the increase in UK interest rates, the interest rate sensitivity has been updated to 1.0%. The prior year disclosure has been updated to 1.0% to show a direct comparison in the sensitivity. In the prior year report, the sensitivity was calculated using 0.5%, which was representative of the market at 31 August 2021. As disclosed in the prior year annual report, an increase of 0.5% reduced total return after taxation by £87,000 (a decrease of 0.5% had an equal and opposite effect).
In the opinion of the directors, this sensitivity analysis may not be representative of the Company's future exposure to interest rate changes as the level of cash balances and drawings on the facility will fluctuate.
Market price risk includes changes in market prices, other than those arising from interest rate risk, which may affect the value of investments.
The board meets on at least four occasions each year to consider the asset allocation of the portfolio and the risk associated with particular industry sectors. The investment management team has responsibility for monitoring the portfolio, which is selected in accordance with the Company's investment objective and seeks to ensure that individual stocks meet an acceptable risk/reward profile.
The Company's total exposure to changes in market prices at 31 August comprised the following:
| 2022 £'000 |
2021 £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Investments held at fair value through profit or loss | 230,497 | 234,811 |
The above data is broadly representative of the exposure to market price risk during the year.
An analysis of the Company's investments is given on page 9. The portfolio principally comprises securities of companies listed on the London Stock Exchange and accordingly there is a concentration of exposure to economic conditions in the UK. However it should be noted that many of these companies conduct much of their business overseas. Furthermore, up to 20% of the portfolio may be listed on overseas stock exchanges.
The following table illustrates the sensitivity of the return after taxation for the year and net assets to an increase or decrease of 20% (2021: 20%) in the fair values of the Company's investments. This level of change is considered to be a reasonable illustration based on observation of current market conditions. The sensitivity analysis is based on the Company's exposure through equity investments and includes the impact on the management fee but assumes that all other variables are held constant.
| 2022 | 2021 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20% increase in fair value £'000 |
20% decrease in fair value £'000 |
20% increase in fair value £'000 |
20% decrease in fair value £'000 |
|
| Income statement – return after taxation | ||||
| Revenue return | (104) | 104 | (106) | 106 |
| Capital return | 45,996 | (45,996) | 46,856 | (46,856) |
| Total return after taxation and net assets | 45,892 | (45,892) | 46,750 | (46,750) |
| Change in net asset value | 22.4% | (22.4%) | 21.3% | (21.3%) |
This is the risk that the Company will encounter difficulty in meeting its obligations associated with financial liabilities that are settled by delivering cash or another financial asset.
Liquidity risk is not significant as the Company's assets comprise mainly readily realisable securities, which can be sold to meet funding requirements if necessary. The facility is also available to provide liquidity at short notice. The board's policy is for the Company to remain fully invested in normal market conditions. The facility may be used to manage working capital requirements and to gear the Company as appropriate.
Contractual maturities of financial liabilities, based on the earliest date on which payment can be required are as follows:
| 2022 Three months or less £'000 |
Total £'000 |
2021 Three months or less £'000 |
Total £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creditors: amounts falling due within one year Securities purchased awaiting settlement |
– | – | – | – |
| Other creditors and accruals | 424 | 424 | 406 | 406 |
| Bank loan – including interest | 30,063 | 30,063 | 25,018 | 25,018 |
| 30,487 | 30,487 | 25,424 | 25,424 |
Credit risk is the risk that the failure of the counterparty to a transaction to discharge its obligations under that transaction could result in loss to the Company.
This risk is not significant and is managed as follows:
The Company invests in markets that operate a "Delivery Versus Payment" settlement process which mitigates the risk of losing the principal of a trade during settlement. The Manager continuously monitors dealing activity to ensure best execution, which involves measuring various indicators including the quality of trade settlement and incidence of failed trades. Counterparties must be pre-approved by the Manager's credit committee.
The custodian of the Company's assets is HSBC Bank plc which has long-term Credit Ratings of AA- with Fitch and Aa3 with Moody's. The Company's investments are held in accounts which are segregated from the custodian's own trading assets. If the custodian were to become insolvent, the Company's right of ownership of its investments is clear and they are therefore protected. However the Company's cash balances are all deposited with the custodian as banker and held on the custodian's balance sheet. Accordingly, in accordance with usual banking practice, the Company will rank as a general creditor to the custodian in respect of cash balances.
The following amounts shown in the Statement of Financial Position, represent the maximum exposure to credit risk at the current and comparative year end.
| 2022 | 2021 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance sheet £'000 |
Maximum exposure £'000 |
Balance sheet £'000 |
Maximum exposure £'000 |
||
| Fixed assets | |||||
| Investments held at fair value through profit or loss |
230,497 | – | 234,811 | – | |
| Current assets | |||||
| Debtors – dividends and interest receivable | |||||
| and other debtors | 2,737 | 2,737 | 2,796 | 2,796 | |
| Cash at bank and in hand | 2,305 | 2,305 | 7,718 | 7,718 | |
| 235,539 | 5,042 | 245,325 | 10,514 |
No debtors are past their due date and none have been written down or deemed to be impaired.
All financial assets and liabilities are either carried at fair value or the amount in the Statement of Financial Position is a reasonable approximation of fair value.
The Company's objectives, policies and processes for managing capital are unchanged from the preceding year.
The Company's debt and capital structure comprises the following:
| 2022 £'000 |
2021 £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Debt | ||
| Bank loan | 30,000 | 25,000 |
| Equity | ||
| Called-up share capital | 6,946 | 6,946 |
| Reserves | 198,154 | 212,969 |
| 205,100 | 219,915 | |
| Total debt and equity | 235,100 | 244,915 |
The Company's capital management objectives are to ensure that it will continue as a going concern and to maximise the return to its equity shareholders through an appropriate level of gearing.
The board's policy is to permit gearing up to 25% where gearing is defined as borrowings used for investment purposes, less cash, expressed as a percentage of net assets.
| 2022 £'000 |
2021 £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Borrowings used for investment purposes, less cash Net assets |
27,695 205,100 |
17,282 219,915 |
| Gearing | 13.5% | 7.9% |
The board, with the assistance of the Manager, monitors and reviews the broad structure of the Company's capital on an ongoing basis. This review includes:
The Annual General Meeting ("AGM") of the Company will be held on Thursday, 15 December 2022 at 12.00 p.m. The formal Notice of Meeting is set out on page 56.
The following information is important and requires your immediate attention. If you are in any doubt about the action you should take, you should consult an independent financial adviser, authorised under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. If you have sold or transferred all of your ordinary shares in the Company, please forward this document with its accompanying form of proxy at once to the purchaser or transferee, or to the stockbroker, bank or other agent through whom the sale or transfer was effected, for onward transmission to the purchaser or transferee.
Resolution 1 is a required resolution. Resolution 2 concerns the Directors' Remuneration Report, on pages 30 and 31. Resolutions 3 to 5 invite shareholders to re-elect each of the directors for another year, apart from Bridget Guerin who is retiring from the board. The re-elections have been recommended by the Nomination Committee on pages 27 and 28 (their biographies are set out on pages 19 and 20). Resolutions 6 and 7 concern the re-appointment and remuneration of the Company's auditor, discussed in the Audit and Risk Committee Report on pages 24 and 25.
In line with corporate governance best practice the board is putting the Company's dividend policy to shareholders for approval. No change to the Company's dividend policy is proposed at this time.
The directors are seeking authority to allot a limited number of unissued ordinary shares for cash without first offering them to existing shareholders in accordance with statutory pre-emption procedures.
Appropriate resolutions will be proposed at the forthcoming AGM and are set out in full in the Notice of AGM. An ordinary resolution will be proposed to authorise the directors to allot shares up to a maximum aggregate nominal amount of £1,389,266 (being 20% of the issued share capital as at the date of the Notice of the AGM). A special resolution will also be proposed to give the directors authority to allot securities for cash on a non pre-emptive basis up to a maximum aggregate nominal amount of £1,389,266 (being 20% of the Company's issued share capital as at the date of the Notice of the AGM).
The directors do not intend to allot shares pursuant to these authorities other than to take advantage of opportunities in the market as they arise and only if they believe it to be advantageous to the Company's existing shareholders to do so. Shares issued under this authority will only be issued at a premium to the NAV (cum income) per share after taking into account the costs of issue, and will not result in any dilution of NAV per share.
If approved, both of these authorities will expire at the conclusion of the AGM in 2023 unless renewed, varied or revoked earlier.
At the AGM held on 16 December 2021, the Company was granted authority to make market purchases of up to 10,412,555 ordinary shares of 10p each for cancellation. No shares have been bought back under this authority and the Company therefore has remaining authority to purchase up to 10,412,555 ordinary shares. This authority will expire at the forthcoming AGM.
The directors believe it is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders to have a general authority for the Company to buy back its ordinary shares in the market as they keep under review the share price discount to NAV and the purchase of ordinary shares. A special resolution will be proposed at the forthcoming AGM to give the Company authority to make market purchases of up to 14.99% of the ordinary shares in issue as at the date of the Notice of the AGM. The directors will exercise this authority only if the directors consider that any purchase would be for the benefit of the Company and its shareholders, taking into account relevant factors and circumstances at the time. Any shares so purchased would be cancelled or held in treasury. If renewed, the authority to be given at the 2022 AGM will lapse at the conclusion of the AGM in 2023 unless renewed, varied or revoked earlier.
The board considers that the resolutions relating to the above items of business are in the best interests of shareholders as a whole. Accordingly, the board unanimously recommends to shareholders that they vote in favour of the above resolutions to be proposed at the forthcoming AGM, as they intend to do in respect of their own beneficial holdings.
Notice is hereby given that the Annual General Meeting of Schroder Income Growth Fund plc will be held on Thursday, 15 December 2022 at 12.00 p.m. at 1 London Wall Place, London EC2Y 5AU to consider the following resolutions of which resolutions 1 to 10 will be proposed as ordinary resolutions and resolutions 11 and 12 will be proposed as special resolutions:
"THAT in substitution for all existing authorities the directors be generally and unconditionally authorised pursuant to section 551 of the Companies Act 2006 (the "Act") to exercise all the powers of the Company to allot relevant securities (within the meaning of section 551 of the Act) up to an aggregate nominal amount of £1,389,266 (being 20% of the issued ordinary share capital, excluding shares held in treasury, at the date of this Notice) for a period expiring (unless previously renewed, varied or revoked by the Company in general meeting) at the conclusion of the next Annual General Meeting of the Company, but that the Company may make an offer or agreement which would or might require relevant securities to be allotted after expiry of this authority and the board may allot relevant securities in pursuance of that offer or agreement."
"That, subject to the passing of Resolution 9 set out above, the directors be and are hereby empowered, pursuant to Section 571 of the Act, to allot equity securities (including any shares held in treasury) (as defined in section 560(1) of the Act) pursuant to the authority given in accordance with section 551 of the Act by the said Resolution 9 and/or where such allotment constitutes an allotment of equity securities by virtue of section 560(2) of the Act as if Section 561(1) of the Act did not apply to any such allotment, provided that this power shall be limited to the allotment of equity securities up to an aggregate nominal amount of £1,389,266
By order of the board for and on behalf of Schroder Investment Management Limited Registered office: Company Secretary 1 London Wall Place
9 November 2022 Registered Number: 03008494
56 Schroder Income Growth Fund plc
(representing 20% of the aggregate nominal amount of the share capital in issue at the date of this Notice); and provided that this power shall expire at the conclusion of the next Annual General Meeting of the Company but so that this power shall enable the Company to make offers or agreements before such expiry which would or might require equity securities to be allotted after such expiry."
"THAT the Company be and is hereby generally and unconditionally authorised in accordance with Section 701 of the Companies Act 2006 (the "Act") to make market purchases (within the meaning of Section 693 of the Act) of ordinary shares of 10p each in the capital of the Company ("Share") at whatever discount the prevailing market price represents to the prevailing net asset value per Share provided that:
London EC2Y 5AU
A proxy form is attached. Shareholders are encouraged to appoint the Chairman as proxy.
If you wish to appoint a person other than the Chairman as your proxy, please insert the name of your chosen proxy holder in the space provided at the top of the form. If the proxy is being appointed in relation to less than your full voting entitlement, please enter in the box next to the proxy holder's name the number of shares in relation to which they are authorised to act as your proxy. If left blank your proxy will be deemed to be authorised in respect of your full voting entitlement (or if this proxy form has been issued in respect of a designated account for a shareholder, the full voting entitlement for that designated account). Additional proxy forms can be obtained by contacting the Company's Registrars, Equiniti Limited, on 0800 032 0641 or +44(0) 121 415 0207 for overseas callers, or you may photocopy the attached proxy form. Please indicate in the box next to the proxy holder's name the number of shares in relation to which they are authorised to act as your proxy. Please also indicate by ticking the box provided if the proxy instruction is one of multiple instructions being given. Completion and return of a form of proxy will not preclude a member from attending the Annual General Meeting and voting in person.
On a vote by show of hands, every ordinary shareholder who is present in person has one vote and every duly appointed proxy who is present has one vote. On a poll vote, every ordinary shareholder who is present in person or by way of a proxy has one vote for every share of which he/she is a holder.
The "Vote Withheld" option on the proxy form is provided to enable you to abstain on any particular resolution. However it should be noted that a "Vote Withheld" is not a vote in law and will not be counted in the calculation of the proportion of the votes 'For' and 'Against' a resolution.
A proxy form must be signed and dated by the shareholder or his or her attorney duly authorised in writing. In the case of joint holdings, any one holder may sign this form. The vote of the senior joint holder who tenders a vote, whether in person or by proxy, will be accepted to the exclusion of the votes of the other joint holder and for this purpose seniority will be determined by the order in which the names appear on the Register of Members in respect of the joint holding. To be valid, proxy form(s) must be completed and returned to the Company's Registrars, Equiniti Limited, Aspect House, Spencer Road, Lancing, West Sussex BN99 6DA, in the enclosed envelope together with any power of attorney or other authority under which it is signed or a copy of such authority certified notarially, to arrive no later than 48 hours before the time fixed for the meeting, or an adjourned meeting. Shareholders may also appoint a proxy to vote on the resolutions being put to the meeting electronically at www.sharevote.co.uk. Shareholders who are not registered to vote electronically, will need to enter the Voting ID, Task ID and Shareholder Reference Number set out in their personalised proxy form. Alternatively, shareholders who have already registered with Equiniti's Shareview service can appoint a proxy by logging onto their portfolio at www.shareview.co.uk using their user ID and password. Once logged in, click "view" on the "My Investments" page, click on the link to vote, then follow the on-screen instructions. The onscreen instructions give details on how to complete the appointment process. Please note that to be valid, your proxy instructions must be received by Equiniti no later than 12.00 p.m. on 13 December 2022. If you have any difficulties with online voting, you should contact the shareholder helpline on 0800 032 0641 (or +44(0) 121 415 0207 for overseas callers).
If an ordinary shareholder submits more than one valid proxy appointment, the appointment received last before the latest time for receipt of proxies will take precedence.
Shareholders may not use any electronic address provided either in this Notice of Annual General Meeting or any related documents to communicate with the Company for any purposes other than expressly stated.
Representatives of shareholders that are corporations will have to produce evidence of their proper appointment when attending the Annual General Meeting.
The statement of the rights of ordinary shareholders in relation to the appointment of proxies in note 1 above does not apply to Nominated Persons. The rights described in that note can only be exercised by ordinary shareholders of the Company.

previously appointed proxy must, in order to be valid, be transmitted so as to be received by the issuer's agent (ID RA19) by the latest time for receipt of proxy appointments.
Shareholders can contact Equiniti for details of how Equiniti processes their personal information as part of the AGM.
The terms and performance measures below are those commonly used by investment companies to assess values, investment performance and operating costs. Numerical calculations are given where relevant. Some of the financial measures below are classified Alternative Performance Measures ("APMs") as defined by the European Securities and Markets Authority. Under this definition, APMs include a financial measure of historical financial performance or financial position, other than a financial measure defined or specified in the applicable financial reporting framework. APMs have been marked with an asterisk.
The Consumer Prices Index is a measure that examines the weighted average of prices of a basket of consumer goods and services, such as transportation, food and medical care. It is calculated by taking price changes for each item in the predetermined basket of goods and averaging them. Changes in the CPI are used to assess price changes associated with the cost of living. The CPI is one of the most frequently used statistics for identifying periods of inflation or deflation.
The index against which it is deemed most appropriate to measure the Company's performance. The reference index is the FTSE All-Share Index.
The NAV per share of 295.26p (2021: 316.59p) represents the net assets attributable to equity shareholders of £205,100,000 (2021: £219,915,000) divided by the number of shares in issue of 69,463,343 (2021: 69,463,343).
The change in the NAV amounted to -6.7% (2021: +28.3%) over the year. However this performance measure excludes the positive impact of dividends paid out by the Company during the year. When these dividends are factored into the calculation, the resulting performance measure is termed the "total return". Total return definitions and calculations are given below.
The combined effect of any dividends paid, together with the rise or fall in the NAV per share or share price. Total return statistics enable the investor to make performance comparisons between investment companies with different dividend policies. Any dividends received by a shareholder are assumed to have been reinvested in either the assets of the Company at its NAV per share at the time the shares were quoted ex-dividend (to calculate the NAV per share total return) or in additional shares of the Company (to calculate the share price total return).
The NAV total return for the year ended 31 August 2022 is calculated as follows:
| NAV at 31/8/21 NAV at 31/8/22 |
316.59p 295.26p |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAV on | Cumulative | |||
| Dividend | XD date | XD date | Factor | factor |
| 5.3p | 07/10/2021 | 299.36 | 1.0177 | 1.0177 |
| 2.5p | 30/12/2021 | 303.36 | 1.0082 | 1.0261 |
| 2.5p | 07/04/2022 | 317.39 | 1.0079 | 1.0342 |
| 2.5p | 07/07/2022 | 295.28 | 1.0085 | 1.0429 |
NAV total return, being the closing NAV,
multiplied by the cumulative factor, expressed as a percentage change in the opening NAV –2.7%
The NAV total return for the year ended 31 August 2021 is calculated as follows:
| NAV at 31/8/20 | 246.71p |
|---|---|
| NAV at 31/8/21 | 316.59p |
| Dividend | XD date | NAV on XD date |
Factor | Cumulative factor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.1p | 08/10/2020 | 250.66p | 1.0203 | 1.0203 |
| 2.5p | 24/12/2020 | 277.78p | 1.0091 | 1.0296 |
| 2.5p | 01/04/2021 | 290.90p | 1.0086 | 1.0385 |
| 2.5p | 08/07/2021 | 305.71p | 1.0082 | 1.0470 |
NAV total return, being the closing NAV, multiplied by the cumulative factor, expressed as a
percentage change in the opening NAV +34.4%
The share price total return for the year ended 31 August 2022 is calculated as follows:
| Share price at 31/8/21 | 316.50p |
|---|---|
| Share price at 31/8/22 | 289.00p |
| Share price | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend | XD date | on XD date |
Factor | Cumulative factor |
| 5.3p | 07/10/2021 | 300.00p | 1.0177 | 1.0177 |
| 2.5p | 30/12/2021 | 300.00p | 1.0083 | 1.0261 |
| 2.5p | 07/04/2022 | 305.00p | 1.0082 | 1.0346 |
| 2.5p | 07/07/2022 | 286.50p | 1.0087 | 1.0436 |
Share price total return, being the closing share price, multiplied by the cumulative factor, expressed as a percentage change in the opening share price -4.7%

The share price total return for the year ended 31 August 2021 is calculated as follows:
| Share price at 31/8/20 Share price at 31/8/21 |
242.00p 316.50p |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend | XD date | Share price on XD date |
Factor | Cumulative factor |
| 5.1p | 08/10/2020 | 242.00p | 1.0211 | 1.0211 |
| 2.5p | 24/12/2020 | 273.50p | 1.0093 | 1.0306 |
| 2.5p | 01/04/2021 | 292.00p | 1.0086 | 1.0394 |
| 2.5p | 08/07/2021 | 305.00p | 1.0082 | 1.0479 |
Share price total return, being the closing share price, multiplied by the cumulative factor, expressed as a percentage change in the opening share price +37.0%
The amount by which the share price of an investment trust is lower (discount) or higher (premium) than the NAV per share. The discount or premium is expressed as a percentage of the NAV per share. The discount at the year end was 2.1% (2021: 0.0%), as the closing share price at 289.00p (2021: 316.50p) was 2.1% (2021: 0.0%) lower than the closing NAV of 295.26p (2021: 316.59p).
The gearing percentage reflects the amount of borrowings (i.e. bank loans or overdrafts) which the Company has drawn down and invested in the market. This figure is indicative of the extra amount by which shareholders' funds would move if the Company's investments were to rise or fall. This represents borrowings used for investment purposes, less cash, expressed as a percentage of net assets. The gearing figure at the year end is calculated as follows:
| 2022 £'000 |
2021 £'000 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Borrowings used for investment purposes, less cash |
27,695 | 17,282 |
| Net assets | 205,100 | 219,915 |
| Gearing | 13.5% | 7.9% |
For the purpose of the Alternative Investment Fund Managers (AIFM) Directive, leverage is any method which increases the Company's exposure, including the borrowing of cash and the use of derivatives. It is expressed as the ratio of the Company's exposure to its net asset value and is required to be calculated both on a "Gross" and a "Commitment" method. Under the Gross method, exposure represents the sum of the absolute values of all positions, so as to give an indication of overall exposure. Under the Commitment method, exposure is calculated in a similar way, but after netting off hedges which satisfy certain strict criteria.
Ongoing charges is calculated in accordance with the AIC's recommended methodology and represents the management fee and all other operating expenses excluding finance costs and transaction costs, amounting to £1,577,000 (2021: £1,566,000), expressed as a percentage of the average daily net asset values during the year of £212,256,000 (2021: £198,074,000).
*Alternative Performance Measures.
The Company has dedicated webpages, which may be found at www.schroders.co.uk/incomegrowth. The webpages have been designed to be utilised as the Company's primary method of electronic communication with shareholders. It contains details of the Company's ordinary share price and copies of annual reports and accounts and other documents published by the Company as well as information on the directors, terms of reference of committees and other governance arrangements. In addition, the webpages contain links to announcements made by the Company to the market, Equiniti's Shareview service and Schroders' website. There is also a section entitled "How to Invest".
The Company releases its NAV per share on both a cum and ex-income basis to the market on a daily basis.
Share price information may also be found in the Financial Times and on the company's webpages.
The Company is a member of the Association of Investment Companies. Further information on the Association can be found on its website, www.theaic.co.uk.
The Company's shares are eligible for stocks and shares ISAs.
The Company currently conducts its affairs so that its shares can be recommended by IFAs to ordinary retail investors in accordance with the FCA's rules in relation to non-mainstream investment products and intends to continue to do so for the foreseeable future. The Company's shares are excluded from the FCA's restrictions which apply to non-mainstream investment products because they are shares in an investment trust.
| First interim dividend paid | 31 January |
|---|---|
| Second interim dividend paid | 30 April |
| Half year results announced | April/May |
| Third interim dividend paid | 31 July |
| Financial year end | 31 August |
| Fourth interim dividend paid | 31 October |
| Annual results announced | November |
| Annual General Meeting | December |
Certain pre-sale, regular and periodic disclosures required by the AIFM Directive may be found either in this annual report or on the Company's webpages.
The Company's leverage policy and details of limits on leverage required under the AIFM Directive are published on the Company's webpages.
The Company's leverage policy and details of its leverage ratio calculation and exposure limits as required by the AIFMD are published on the Company's webpages and within this report. The Company is also required to periodically publish its actual leverage exposures. As at 31 August 2022 these were:
| Maximum | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| Leverage exposure | exposure | exposure |
| Gross method | 200.0% | 129.20% |
| Commitment method | 200.0% | 112.20% |
As at the date of this report, none of the Company's assets are subject to special arrangements arising from their illiquid nature.
Quantitative remuneration disclosures to be made in this annual report in accordance with FCA Handbook rule FUND3.3.5 may also be found in the Company's AIFMD information disclosure document published on the Investor Relations section of Schroders' website www.schroders.com.
Pursuant to the Packaged Retail and Insurance Based Investment Products ("PRIIPs") Regulation, the Manager, as the Company's AIFM, is required to publish a short KID on the Company. KIDs are designed to provide certain prescribed information to retail investors, including details of potential returns under different performance scenarios and a risk/reward indicator. The Company's KID is available on its webpages.
Bridget Guerin Ewen Cameron Watt Fraser McIntyre Victoria Muir
Schroder Unit Trusts Limited 1 London Wall Place London EC2Y 5AU
Schroder Investment Management Limited 1 London Wall Place London EC2Y 5AU Telephone: 020 7658 6501
1 London Wall Place London EC2Y 5AU
HSBC Bank plc 8 Canada Square London E14 5HQ
Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation 99 Queen Victoria Street London EC4V 4EH
Peel Hunt LLP 100 Liverpool Street London EC2M 2AT
Ernst & Young LLP Atria One 144 Morrison Street Edinburgh EH3 8EX
Equiniti Limited Aspect House Spencer Road Lancing West Sussex BN99 6DA Shareholder Helpline: 0800 032 0641* Website: www.shareview.co.uk
*Calls to this number are free of charge from UK landlines.
Communications with shareholders are mailed to the address held on the register. Any notifications and enquiries relating to shareholdings, including a change of address or other amendment should be directed to Equiniti Limited at the above address.
General enquiries about the Company should be addressed to the Company Secretary at the Company's registered office.
ISIN: GB0007915860 SEDOL: 0791586 Ticker: SCF
Global intermediary identification number (GIIN)
T34UKV.99999.SL.826
Legal entity identifier (LEI) 549300X1RTYYP7S3YE39
The Company's privacy notice is available on its webpages.

Building tools?
Free accounts include 100 API calls/year for testing.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.