Investor Presentation • Nov 26, 2014
Investor Presentation
Open in ViewerOpens in native device viewer
CEO Leif Inge Nordhammer March 6, 2014, Bergen
This is SalMar
Northern Norway : harvest 43 000 tgw (2014) +50,4% in 16 licenses in Finnmark (Villa Organic)
Central Norway : harvest 90 000 tgw (2014)
Total harvest 2014: 133 000 tgw (+ 16 %)
50% of Scottish Sea Farms Ltd. – harvest 2014 25 000 tgw
SalMar Japan KK – sales
SalMar Korea
SalMar's current license situation
| Segment | Wholly owned |
R&D/partners | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Central Norway Trøndelag & Nordmøre |
44 (MAB 780 tonns) - Trøndelag: 29 - Nordmøre: 15 |
9 - Sintef /Veso: 5 - STFK / Frøya VGS: 1 - Other : 3 |
53 |
| Northern Norway Troms & Finnmark |
23 (MAB 945 tonns) -SalMar Nord |
1 | 24 |
| Rauma Møre & Romsdal |
16 (MAB 780 tonns) - SalMar Rauma |
2 - Villa Miljølaks: 1 - Villa Miljølaks / Ålesund University College: 1 |
18 |
| Total | 83 | 12 | 95 |
The fourth largest salmon producer in the world
The third largest salmon producer in Norway
The world`s largest producer of organic salmon
This is SalMar
Q4 and preliminary 2013
Production cost in salmon farming
| million NOK |
2013 FY |
2012 FY |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating income |
6 245 9 , |
4 204 8 , |
|
| of goods sold Cost |
3 051 2 , |
2 324 8 , |
|
| Payroll expenses |
623 1 , |
483 2 , |
|
| Other operating expenses |
1 086 3 , |
886 0 , |
|
| EBITDA | 1 485 3 , |
510 8 , |
|
| Depreciations | 225 8 , |
170 2 , |
|
| Operational EBIT |
1 259 5 , |
340 7 , |
|
| value adjustment Fair |
528 2 , |
290 4 , |
|
| Particular biological events |
-54 6 , |
||
| Non-recurring gains aquisition on |
161 8 , |
62 4 , |
|
| Operational profit |
949 1 4 , |
638 9 , |
|
| from Income investments in associates |
158 0 , |
93 9 , |
|
| Other financial items |
214 7 , |
-124 3 , |
|
| Profit before tax |
2 322 1 , |
608 5 , |
|
| Tax | 426 9 , |
127 1 , |
|
| profit for the period Net |
1 895 2 , |
481 4 , |
2013 profits highest in the company's
history.
High salmon prices
Record high volumes
BoD will propose a DPS of NOK 8.0
| Q4 | Q4 | FY | FY | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 | 12 | 2013 | 2012 | |
| 546 7 , |
463 5 , |
2 702 0 , |
1 727 7 , |
|
| 148 | 61 | 924 | 202 | |
| 4 | 5 | 2 | 6 | |
| , | , | , | , | |
| 27 | 13 | 34 | 11 | |
| 2% | 3% | 2% | 7% | |
| , | , | , | , | |
| 14 | 16 | 70 | 65 | |
| 0 | 9 | 2 | 3 | |
| , | , | , | , | |
| 10 | 3 | 13 | 3 | |
| 58 | 64 | 17 | 10 | |
| , | , | , | , | |
| Q4 | Q4 | FY | FY | |
| 13 | 12 | 2013 | 2012 | |
| 429 | 320 | 912 | 692 | |
| 0 | 3 | 7 | 0 | |
| , | , | , | , | |
| 164 | 49 | 320 | 83 | |
| 1 | 6 | 2 | 4 | |
| , | , | , | , | |
| 38 | 15 | 35 | 12 | |
| 3% | 5% | 1% | 0% | |
| , | , | , | , | |
| 10 | 9 | 23 | 22 | |
| 7 | 2 | 8 | 4 | |
| , | , | , | , | |
| 15 | 5 | 13 | 3 | |
| 32 | 36 | 45 | 73 | |
| , | , | , | , | |
-Somewhat disappointing EBIT margin
| NOKm | Q4 13 |
Q4 12 |
2013 FY |
2012 FY |
Farming Northern Norway |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (mill ) Operating income |
429 0 , |
320 3 , |
912 7 , |
692 0 , |
-Good performance |
| Operational (mill ) EBIT |
164 1 , |
49 6 , |
320 2 , |
83 4 , |
– Strong EBIT margin in the quarter – Harvest volume evenly distributed |
| Operational % EBIT |
38 3% , |
15 5% , |
35 1% , |
12 0% , |
throughout the quarter |
| Harvested volume (1 tgw) 000 , |
10 7 , |
9 2 , |
23 8 , |
22 4 , |
– Good biological development improving underlying cost for |
| EBIT/ kg (NOK) gw |
15 32 , |
36 5 , |
13 45 , |
3 73 , |
standing biomass |
| NOKm | Q4 13 |
Q4 12 |
FY 2013 |
FY 2012 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (mill ) Operating income |
187 0 , |
97 0 , |
595 4 , |
419 4 , |
|
| Operational (mill ) EBIT |
44 4 , |
7 5 - , |
161 9 , |
0 8 , |
|
| Operational EBIT % |
23 7% , |
7 7% - , |
27 2% , |
0 2% , |
|
| Harvested volume (1 tgw) 000 , |
4 4 , |
3 5 , |
14 9 , |
14 9 , |
|
| EBIT/ kg (NOK) gw |
10 02 , |
2 16 - , |
10 88 , |
0 06 , |
|
| NOKm | Q4 13 |
Q3 13 |
FY 2013 |
||
| (mill ) Operating income |
232 1 , |
82 4 , |
314 5 , |
||
| Operational (mill ) EBIT |
60 5 , |
6 0 - , |
54 4 , |
||
| Operational EBIT % |
26 0% , |
7 3% - , |
17 3% , |
||
| Harvested volume (1 tgw) 000 , |
5 0 , |
1 1 , |
6 1 , |
||
| EBIT/ kg (NOK) gw |
12 18 , |
5 37 - , |
8 95 , |
||
| NOKm | Q4 13 |
Q4 12 |
2013 FY |
2012 FY |
|
| (mill ) Operating income |
1 622 8 , |
1 296 8 , |
6 047 4 , |
4 231 3 , |
|
| Operational (mill ) EBIT |
37 6 - , |
16 2 , |
160 9 - , |
0 55 , |
|
| Operational % EBIT |
3% 2 - , |
2% 1 , |
7% 2 - , |
3% 1 , |
The process of splitting the company progresses as planned
Sales and Processing
-
Cost of feed far from everything – but contributed most …..
| NOK/KG |
|---|
| 0,06 |
| 0,08 |
| 0,11 |
| 0,14 |
| 0,17 |
| 0,24 |
| 0,28 |
| 0,35 |
| 0,49 |
| 0,63 |
| 1,52 |
| 6,47 |
| 10,55 |
| 12,71 |
| 2,67 |
| 15,38 |
Production cost (live fish)10,55
– Equal to 15,38 gutted in box
EFCR 1,00
Salary costs NOK 0,63 pr. kg
Administration costs NOK 0,35 pr. kg
Other operating costs NOK 0,28 pr. kg
Health & veterinarian cost NOK 0,06 pr. kg
| Top performer 2005 G |
Sample 2010 harvest |
Sample 2013 harvest |
∆ 05G – 2013 harvest |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost live weight | 10,55 | 15,94 | 19,32 | + 8,77 |
| Cost gutted in sea | 12,71 | 19,20 | 23,28 | +10,57 |
| Harvest, well boat & packaging |
2,67 | 2,80 | 3,35 | + 0,68 |
| Cost gutted weight |
15,38 | 22,00 | 26,63 | +11,25 |
Source: SalMar estimates, SSB, Fishpool, data listed companies
17
Source: SalMar estimates of development for the industry in general
| Cost component | Focus areas and actions to mitigate cost increase (examples) |
|---|---|
| Feed Costs | EFCR, selection of feed (feed composition), raw material, commodity prices |
| Health & veterinarian |
Sea lice treatment: Wrasse, mechanical, less use of chemicals |
| Administration | "Rightsizing" the organisation, streamline IT & communication platforms, effective business support |
| Smolt | Genetics, Size, timing, mortality rate, vaccines (PD) |
| Harvesting & VAP | Economies of scale, high capacity utilization, automation, flexibility |
| Reduce production time in sea | Size of smolt, fewer and effective treatments of sea lice |
| Other operating costs |
Centralized purchasing arrangements, efficient working practices, high utilization of fixed assets, pre rigor fillets |
| How much of the cost increase can be addressed ? | |
Direct focus on cost components and operational actions to mitigate cost increases.
Gain access to new semi-offshore farming sites.
Building tools?
Free accounts include 100 API calls/year for testing.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.