AI Terminal

MODULE: AI_ANALYST
Interactive Q&A, Risk Assessment, Summarization
MODULE: DATA_EXTRACT
Excel Export, XBRL Parsing, Table Digitization
MODULE: PEER_COMP
Sector Benchmarking, Sentiment Analysis
SYSTEM ACCESS LOCKED
Authenticate / Register Log In

Saipem

Governance Information Apr 11, 2023

4504_cgr_2023-04-11_0dc3c1d1-e31e-4057-bc2b-b8d01faa9e35.pdf

Governance Information

Open in Viewer

Opens in native device viewer

Corporate Governance and Shareholding Structure REPORT 2022

Pursuant to Article 123-bis of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998, approved by the Board of Directors on March 14, 2023 (Traditional Management and Control Model)

MISSION

We are committed to working alongside our customers, transforming their strategies and projects into competitive and sustainable infrastructures, plants and processes, accompanying them on the path to energy transition. We want to be the key ingredient in companies' energy transition, their bridge to a sustainable future.

VALUES

Creative intelligence; care for people and the planet; striving for trust; enhancement of cultural identities.

COUNTRIES IN WHICH SAIPEM OPERATES

EUROPE

Albania, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Kingdom

AMERICAS

Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Guyana, Mexico, Peru, United States, Venezuela

CIS

Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Russia

AFRICA

Algeria, Angola, Congo, Côte d'Ivoire, Egypt, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Ghana, Kenya, Libya, Mauritania, Morocco, Mozambique, Nigeria, Senegal, South Africa, Tanzania, Tunisia, Uganda

MIDDLE EAST

Bahrain, Iraq, Israel, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates

FAR EAST AND OCEANIA

Australia, China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand, Vietnam

Corporate Governance and Shareholding Structure Report 2022

Executive Summary 2
Glossary 9
Corporate Governance and Shareholding Structure Report 10
Issuer profile 10
Principles and values 11
Management and control system 11
Regulatory System 12
Sustainability Model 13
Code of Ethics
Shareholding structure (pursuant to Article 123-bis, paragraph 1, of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998) as at Dec. 31, 2022
Share capital distribution (pursuant to Article 123-bis, paragraph 1, letter a), of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998)
Restrictions on transfer of shares (pursuant to Article 123-bis, paragraph 1, letter b), of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998)
Relevant shareholdings (pursuant to Article 123-bis, paragraph 1, letter c), of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998)
Shares with special control rights (pursuant to Article 123-bis, paragraph 1, letter d), of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998)
Shareholding of employees: exercise of voting rights
15
16
16
16
16
17
(pursuant to Article 123-bis, paragraph 1, letter e), of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998)
Voting rights restrictions (pursuant to Article 123-bis, paragraph 1, letter f), of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998)
Shareholders' agreements (pursuant to Article 123-bis, paragraph 1, letter g), of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998)
Change of control clauses (pursuant to Article 123-bis, paragraph 1, letter h), of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998)
Statutory provisions for takeover bids
17
17
17
18
(pursuant to Article 104, paragraph 1-ter and Article104-bis, paragraph 1, of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998)
Indemnification for Directors in case of dismissal (without just cause), resignation or termination following a takeover bid
Directors' appointment or replacement and modifications to the Articles of Association
Share capital increases and buy-back of treasury shares
18
18
19
(pursuant to Article 123-bis, paragraph 1, letter m), of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998)
Direction and coordination (pursuant to Article 2497 and subsequent of the Italian Civil Code)
Compliance with the Corporate Governance Code
19
19
(pursuant to Article 123-bis, paragraph 2, letter a), first part, of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998) 20
Board of Directors 21
Board of Directors' role
Appointment and replacement (pursuant to Article 123-bis, paragraph 1, letter l), of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998)
Composition (pursuant to Article 123-bis, paragraph 2, letter d) and d-bis), of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998)
Functioning of the Board of Directors (pursuant to Article 123-bis, paragraph 2, letter d), of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998) 29
Role of the Chairman of the Board of Directors
Executive Directors
21
24
26
30
31
Independent Directors and Lead Independent Director
Processing of inside information
Board of Directors' Committees (pursuant to Article 123-bis, paragraph 2, letter d), of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998) 34
32
33
Board review and succession of Directors - Nomination Committee 36
Board review 36
Succession plans 37
Compensation and Nomination Committee 38
Directors' compensation 39
Internal Control and Risk Management System 40
The Board of Directors 42
Director responsible for the Internal Control System 43
Board of Statutory Auditors 43
Audit and Risk Committee 44
Director responsible for the Internal Audit function 45
Risk Management 46
Business Integrity 47
Organisation Model pursuant to Legislative Decree No. 231/2001 / Compliance Committee 47
External auditors 49
Senior Manager responsible for the Company's Financial Reporting 49
Coordination of bodies involved in the Internal Control and Risk Management System 49
Directors' and Statutory Auditors' interests and transactions with related parties 50
Board of Statutory Auditors 52
Composition, appointment and functions of the Board of Statutory Auditors
Relations with the shareholders
Shareholders' Meeting (pursuant to Article 123-bis, paragraph 1, letter l), paragraph 1, letter c),
52
56
of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998)
Saipem Corporate Governance additional practices (pursuant to Article 123-bis, paragraph 2, letter a),
second part, of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998)
59
60
Events subsequent to year-end 60
Considerations on the letter by the Chairman of the Corporate Governance Committee dated January 25, 2023 60
Tables 63
Table 1. Shareholding structure 63
Table 2. Structure of the Board of Directors 64
Table 3. Structure of the Board Committees 64
Table 4. Structure of the Board of Statutory Auditors 65
Appendix A 66

The Corporate Governance Report is published on Saipem's website at www.saipem.com, under the "Governance" section.

(1) Paolo Calcagnini was appointed by the Board of Directors on May 27, 2022 as the Senior Manager responsible for the Company's Financial Reporting, pursuant to Article 154-bis of Legislative Decree 58/1998, reporting directly to the corporate bodies as required by law.

(2) The Director of the Internal Audit Function – Mr. Maurizio Bonzi – reports hierarchically to the Board of Directors and, on its behalf, to the Chairman of the Board, except for those duties that fall under the remit of the Audit and Risk Committee and the CEO, in his capacity as Officer responsible for the Internal Control and Risk Management System. (3) The Secretary of the Board of Directors – Mr. Simone Chini – reports hierarchically and functionally to the Board and, on its behalf, to the Chairman of the Board.

Corporate governance 2022*

(*) Source: Bloomberg.

Saipem Shareholders (%) as at December 31, 2022

The Shareholders' Agreement in force between Eni SpA and CDP Equity SpA concerns the following shares brought by the Parties ("Syndicated Shares"):

(i) CDP Equity SpA, No. 249,504,583 shares, representing approximately 12.503% of Saipem ordinary share capital; and

(ii) Eni SpA, No. 249,504,583 shares, representing approximately 12.503% of Saipem ordinary share capital.

Board of Directors

Composition

Director Office Role No. of other offices (*) M/m (**)
Silvia Merlo Chairman Independent (ex Leg. Decree 58/98/Code) 1 M
Alessandro Puliti (***) CEO and
General Manager
Executive - -
Roberto Diacetti Director Independent (ex Leg. Decree 58/98/Code) 2 m
Alessandra Ferone Director Non-executive 1 M
Patrizia Michela Giangualano Director Independent (ex Leg. Decree 58/98/Code) 2 m
Davide Manunta (****) Director Non-executive 1 -
Marco Reggiani Director Non-executive 1 M
Paul Schapira Director Independent (ex Leg. Decree 58/98/Code) 1 m
Paola Tagliavini Director Independent (ex Leg. Decree 58/98/Code) 3 M

(*) Number of other Directorships or Auditor posts held in other listed companies or large companies.

(**) Majority list (M)/minority list (m).

(***) Appointed by co-option by the Board of Directors on August 31, 2022 until the Ordinary Shareholders' Meeting convened to approve the 2022 Consolidated Annual Financial Report, replacing Pier Francesco Ragni, who resigned.

(****) Appointed by co-option by the Board of Directors on October 26, 2022 to replace Francesco Caio, former Chief Executive Officer and General Manager, who resigned on August 31, 2022.

Composition of the Board of Directors

Current mandate
Number of Directors 9
Directors appointed by minority Shareholders 3
% of the least represented gender in the BoD 44.4%
% Independent Directors 55.5%
Directors' average age 54
Chairman-CEO or Chairman-controlling shareholder no
Existence of the Lead Independent Director no

DIRECTORS SENIORITY

Directors' competencies from the 2022 Board Review, as expressed by each Director, with reference to the Board of Directors

Operation of the Board of Directors as at December 31, 2022

Number of Board Committee meetings and average member participation as at December 31, 2022

Committee Number of Meetings Participation
Compensation and Nomination Committee 18 100%
Audit and Risk Committee 19 94.74%
Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance Committee 8 100%
Related Parties Committee 9 92.59%

Board Review 2022

The Board Review took place Yes
Evaluator Self-review with the support of the Company Affairs function
Evaluating method Questionnaires
CNC composition Independent Executive
Paul Schapira (Chairman) Yes Non-executive
Alessandra Ferone No Non-executive
Paola Tagliavini Yes Non-executive

NUMBER OF CNC MEETINGS CNC PARTICIPATION

Paola Tagliavini (Chairman) Yes Non-executive
Roberto Diacetti Yes Non-executive
Paul Schapira Yes Non-executive
SSGC composition Independent Executive
Silvia Merlo (Chairman) Yes Non-executive
Patrizia Michela Giangualano Yes Non-executive
Pier Francesco Ragni (up to August 31, 2022) No Non-executive
Davide Manunta (from October 26, 2022) No Non-executive
Marco Reggiani No Non-executive

Roberto Diacetti Yes Non-executive

NUMBER OF SSGC MEETINGS SSGC PARTICIPATION

RPC composition Independent Executive Paola Michela Giangualano (Chairman) Yes Non-executive Paola Tagliavini Yes Non-executive

BOARD OF STATUTORY AUDITORS

Board of statutory Auditors

Statutory Auditor Office Other offices M/m
Giovanni Fiori Chairman - m
Giulia De Martino Statutory Auditor 2 M
Norberto Rosini Statutory Auditor 1 M
Maria Francesca Talamonti Alternate Auditor 2 M
Francesca Maurelli Alternate Auditor 3 m

EXTERNAL AUDITORS

External Auditors Appointment Duration
KPMG SpA Shareholders' Meeting of May 3, 2018 2019-2027

\ 8

GLOSSARY

Corporate Governance Code: the Corporate Governance Code approved by the Corporate Governance Committee on January 31, 2020, applicable from the first financial year that begins after December 31, 2020.

Code: the Corporate Governance Code for listed Companies (July 2018) in force until December 31, 2020, approved by the Corporate Governance Committee and endorsed by Borsa Italiana SpA, ABI, Ania, Assogestioni, Assonime and Confindustria.

Committee/CG Committee/Corporate Governance Committee: the Italian Committee for Corporate Governance of listed companies, endorsed by Borsa Italiana SpA, as well as by ABI, Ania, Assogestioni, Assonime and Confindustria.

Board of Directors: the Board of Directors of the Issuer.

CoSO Report: internal control system model issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission - 1992.

Issuer: issuer of stocks and shares referred to in this Report.

Year: financial year 2022, subject of this Report.

Consob Issuers' Regulations: regulations issued by Consob through Resolution No. 11971 of 1999 (and subsequent amendments) on Issuers.

Consob Market Regulations: regulations issued by Consob through Resolution No. 16191 of March 12, 2007 (and subsequent amendments) on Markets.

Consob Related Parties' Regulations: regulations issued by Consob through Resolution No. 17221 of March 12, 2010 (and subsequent amendments) on transactions with related parties.

Report: Corporate Governance and Shareholding Structure Report, which companies are required to issue in compliance with Article 123-bis, of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998.

TUF: Legislative Decree No. 58/1998 (TUF - Testo Unico della Finanza), issued on February 24, 1998

Unless otherwise specified, the definitions concerning the following are those referred to in the Corporate Governance Code: directors, executive directors, independent directors, significant shareholder, Chief Executive Officer-CEO, management body, control body, business plan, concentrated company, large company, sustainable success, top management.

Corporate governance and shareholding structure report

The Report is designed to provide a general and complete overview of Saipem SpA's ("Saipem" or "the Company") corporate governance system.

In order to comply with applicable laws and stock market listing standards, in keeping with the recommendations of Borsa Italiana SpA and of the relevant business associations, the Report also furnishes information regarding Saipem's shareholding, its compliance with the corporate governance codes established by institutional bodies and the relevant commitments to observe them, as well as the choices that the Company has made in implementing its governance.

This Report is available at Saipem's headquarters, published on Saipem's website, and sent to Borsa Italiana SpA and the authorised storage mechanism "eMarket Storage" (), under the terms and methods provided by current legislation.

The Company adhered to the Corporate Governance Code through a resolution by the Board of Directors dated December 17, 2020, effective from January 1, 2021, and informed the market through the 2020 Corporate Governance and Shareholding Structure Report, as well as in this Report, as required by the Corporate Governance Code itself.

The information contained in this Report relates to the financial year 2022 and has been updated, with respect to specific matters as of March 14, 2023.

The Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance Committee of February 21, 2023 examined the contents of this Report and expressed a favourable opinion. At the same meeting, the Committee found Saipem's governance to be substantially in line with the provisions of the Corporate Governance Code (for further information on the application of the Corporate Governance Code, please refer to the contents of this Report and, in particular, Appendix A). The Board of Directors, having acknowledged the assessments of the Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance Committee, approved this Report at the Board meeting of March 14, 2023.

Issuer profile

Saipem is a leading global contractor with a significant local presence in strategic emerging areas such as Africa, Central Asia, America, the Middle East and South East Asia. Saipem enjoys a competitive edge for providing EPCI (Engineering, Procurement, Construction, Installation) and EPC (Engineering, Procurement, Construction) services to the oil&gas industry, both onshore and offshore, with a special focus on complex and technologically-advanced projects, including activities in remote areas, in deep waters and on projects involving the exploitation of gas or crude oil supplies in challenging environments. The drilling services offered by the Company stand out in many of the most critical areas of the oil industry, often thanks to synergies between onshore and offshore activities. The Company also carries out engineering services through simplified processes and innovative digitalisation models and operates in sectors such as renewable energy, infrastructure, decommissioning and maintenance, modification and operations.

Saipem is also a technological and advanced engineering platform for the design, construction and operation of complex, increasingly innovative, safe and sustainable infrastructures and plants. Thanks to its engineering competencies, technological innovation capacity, strong problem-solving orientation and willingness to work as a team and as a system, it tackles the most complex challenges, fostering the development of the communities in which it operates. Saipem operates in more than 70 countries, and in almost every Oil&Gas market in the world, through a decentralised structure which enables it to respond to local needs and sustainability challenges. Wherever it operates, Saipem plays an active role in the local community, contributing to the social, economic and environmental life of each area, mainly in terms of local employment – totalling around 30,000 employees of 130 different nationalities – and long-term value creation. Saipem has always been actively engaged in developing relationships with local stakeholders, both in communities where it has a historical presence and in areas where it has recently entered.

Saipem has been listed on the Milan Stock Exchange since 1984.

Saipem falls within the definition of large company provided by the Corporate Governance Code, as its capitalisation exceeded € 1billion on the last trading day of each of the 3 calendar years preceding the end of the reference year, and is also classed as a non-concentrated ownership company as the shareholders Eni SpA and CDP Equity SpA, which are parties of the current shareholders' agreement detailed below, do not hold, even through subsidiaries – trustees or third parties, the voting majority at ordinary shareholders' meetings.

From January 14, 2022, Saipem has adopted an organisational model divided into four distinct business areas, each one with different dynamics, objectives and skills.

1) "Asset Based Services" (drilling, vessels, fabrication), based on a rigorous discipline of asset optimisation;

2) "Energy Carriers", for the design of complex plants or their conversion to low carbon with a growing focus on the best risk/return balance and with greater attention to margins;

  • 3) "Robotics and Industrialized Solutions" for the development of the offer of modular/repeatable/scalable systems and monitoring and maintenance services based on digital technologies;
  • 4) "Substainable Infrastructures": for growth in a sector that has become strategic in the new ecosystem of energy transition and sustainable mobility.

The model has been integrated to reinforce the execution capabilities for the Company's projects and to complete the strategic review, required during the year, aimed at strengthening the capital and financial structure of the Group.

The following are the most important actions that were implemented:

  • ≥ the establishment of a new General Manager function with broad operative and managerial responsibilities (until August 31, 2022);
  • ≥ the creation of a specific unit focused on reinforcing the activity of financial planning and control of the projects and of the other company's operations;
  • ≥ the consolidation of the legal and contract management into one corporate department;
  • ≥ the establishment of an independent Integrated Risk Management function, to ensure the management and overview of corporate risks.

To complete the new organisation, with effect from February 2023, the Company established the new Offshore Wind business line, which is added to the four business lines established in January 2022 mentioned above. The organisational structure at the date of this Report is therefore as follows: Asset Based Services, Energy Carriers, Robotics and Industrialized Solutions, Sustainable Infrastructures and Offshore Wind.

Principles and values

Saipem undertakes to maintain a governance system in line with international best practice standards, able to deal with the complex situations in which Saipem operates, and with the challenges to face for sustainable development. Sustainability for Saipem means conducting its business while remaining mindful of our responsibilities towards all the stakeholders. Ensuring fair and cooperative relationships is vital for the success of our projects. Saipem's sustainability model permeates all Company processes. It is orientated towards excellence and the pursuit of long-term objectives, to prevent, mitigate and manage possible risks.

Saipem operates within the reference framework of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Fundamental Conventions of the ILO – International Labour Organisation – and the OECD Guidelines on Multinational Enterprises.

Any form of discrimination, corruption, forced or child labour is rejected. Saipem constantly strives to acknowledge and safeguard the dignity, freedom and equality of human beings, the protection of labour and of the freedom of trade union association, health, safety, the environment and biodiversity, as well as the set of values and principles concerning transparency, energy efficiency and sustainable development, in accordance with international institutions and conventions.

Respect for human rights is the foundation of the inclusive growth of societies and geographical areas and, consequently, of the companies that work within them. Saipem contributes to the creation of the socio-economic conditions required for the effective enjoyment of fundamental rights and promotes the professional growth and well-being of its own human resources wherever they are located. Saipem's commitment to promoting human and labour rights in its operations is reiterated in the Company's Policy on Human Rights.

In line with the provisions of the 2015 "UK Modern Slavery Act", Saipem annually publishes a "Saipem Modern Slavery Statement", which describes the policies and actions taken by the Saipem Group in the previous year to develop and implement measures and improve existing systems and processes, to guarantee human and labour rights and prevent modern slavery and human trafficking in its activities and its supply chain.

Management and control system

Saipem's organisational structure is based on the traditional administration and control model, comprised of:

  • ≥ the Board of Directors, central body in the corporate governance system, responsible for the management of the Company. The Board of Directors, with the aim of pursuing the sustainable success of the Company, draws on the investigative, propositional and advisory support provided by the Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance Committee, for instance defining, at the proposal of the Chief Executive Officer, the strategic lines and objectives of the Company and the Group including sustainability policies and monitoring their implementation;
  • ≥ the Board of Statutory Auditors, with supervisory and control duties;
  • ≥ the Shareholders' Meeting manifests the will of the shareholders, through resolutions adopted in compliance with the law and the Company's Articles of Association. The Shareholders' Meeting is also the institutional meeting point between the Company's management and the Shareholders themselves. The Shareholders' Meeting appoints the Board of Directors and its Chairman for a period not exceeding three fiscal years.

The Chairman has the power to represent the Company, pursuant to Article 21 of the Company's Articles of Association, together with those Directors vested with executive powers (pursuant to Article 26 of Articles of Association).

On May 18, 2021, the Board of Directors resolved to set up the following Board Committees: the Audit and Risk Committee, the Compensation and Nomination Committee, the Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance Committee and, for the first time as an independent body from the Audit and Risk Committee, the Related Parties Committee.

The Director responsible for Internal Audit reports to the Board of Directors and, on its behalf, to the Chairman of the Board; he also reports to the Audit and Risk Committee and the CEO in his capacity as the Director responsible for the Internal Control and Risk Management System.

On August 31, 2022, the Board of Directors, having received the opinion of the Compensation and Nomination Committee and with the approval of the Board of Statutory Auditors, appointed, pursuant to and for the purposes of Article 2386, first paragraph, of the Italian Civil Code, as Board Director Alessandro Puliti, who already held the position of General Manager of the Company. At the same meeting, Alessandro Puliti was also appointed Chief Executive Officer. Pursuant to the Guidelines contained in the MSG "Internal Control and Risk Management System", the Board of Directors identified the CEO and General Manager as the person responsible for maintaining an effective Internal Control System.

On June 9, 2021, the Board of Directors appointed Antonio Paccioretti, Saipem's Chief Financial Officer as of June 1, 2021, as the Director responsible for the Company's Financial Reporting, pursuant to Article 154-bis of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998, replacing Stefano Cavacini, who had resigned on May 31, 2021.

Subsequently, the Board of Directors on May 27, 2022 appointed Paolo Calcagnini as Chief Financial Officer and, having consulted with the Compensation and Nomination Committee, with the favourable opinion of the Board of Statutory Auditors, as Officer responsible for Financial Reporting, pursuant to Article 154-bis of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998. Mr Calcagnini had held the position of Chief Project Control and Financial Advisory Officer of the Company since February 4, 2022, heading a department aimed at strengthening the Company's financial planning and control activities.

Regulatory System

The Regulatory System is part of Saipem's Corporate Governance and is one of the tools used by Saipem to exercise direction, coordination and control over its subsidiaries, both in Italy and abroad.

Saipem's Regulatory System is a dynamic system that is continuously improved as the internal and external context evolves. The System is organised, developed and distributed in such a way as to facilitate usability and understanding by its users.

The Regulatory System is process-based, regardless of the positioning of the respective duties within the corporate and organisational structure of Saipem and its subsidiaries. All of Saipem's activities have been grouped into a map of processes involving more than one area, identifying a Process Owner for each process, responsible for defining policies, guidelines and methodologies that are common to the whole Group with regard to the process under their responsibility or for defining the rules regarding compliance and governance issues, guaranteeing suitability over time.

Saipem uses the Regulatory System to promote the integration of principles of compliance into Company processes, with a view to disseminating the rules and standards of control established by the various compliance models, and introducing them into the operational context at the various entities. The regulatory documents contain the minimum control principles that the persons involved in the regulated process are required to adhere to in order to operate in accordance with the applicable regulations, legal requirements and other Saipem management tools, including the organisational structure, the system of powers and the strategic plan.

Furthermore, Saipem's regulatory system is based on, and is consistent with, the general framework, which comprises: legal provisions, the Articles of Association, the Corporate Governance Code, the CoSO Report, the Organisation, Management and Control Model (which includes the Code of Ethics), the Internal Control and Risk Management System and the Internal Control System over Financial Reporting.

Each company in the Group has a Regulatory System that is divided into two macro categories of regulatory documents:

  • ≥ regulatory documents for steering, coordination and control issued by Saipem, which, subject to their formal adoption, apply also to subsidiary companies;
  • ≥ regulatory documents for company operations issued by Saipem and its subsidiaries, which apply to the individual companies responsible for their issue.
  • The first category comprises:
  • ≥ documents that define the fundamental principles and general rules of conduct that must inspire all activities carried out by Saipem (Policies);
  • ≥ documents that define guidelines for company processes, as well as compliance and governance issues, identifying objectives and main activities, actors, limits, and internal and external regulatory controls, rules of conduct, authorisation levels and reporting flows (Management System Guidelines);
  • ≥ documents that discipline work processes or specific issues of compliance or governance (Procedures);
  • ≥ documents that define and explain criteria, methods, techniques, tools, methodologies, reporting flows, standard parameters/classifications to use for specific activities.

The second category comprises documents that define policies, principles and operating methods for a specific company context to ensure compliance with local and international legislation and/or ensure detailed regulation of sub-processes in line with the specific nature of the company and consistent with the policy, coordination and control documents.

Regulatory documents are published on the Company's intranet and are sent to all employees of Saipem and the relevant subsidiaries. Certain regulatory documents are also published on the Company's website www.saipem.com.

During 2022, with a view to continuous improvement, activities continued to ensure alignment of Saipem's regulatory system to the evolution of the operating models and organisational structure of the Company, as well as of the legislative/regulatory and business context, through the periodic certification by the various Process Owners. Periodic monitoring activities continue to ensure the implementation of regulatory documents by the subsidiaries.

Sustainability Model

Sustainability for Saipem is the ability to create shared value with its stakeholders. It represents a pillar of its business strategy and an enabling factor for the leading role that the Company intends to play in the current economic, social and market context, particularly in the energy transition and in the implementation of sustainable infrastructure.

Saipem's Sustainability Model ("Sustainability Model") has been developed and maintained by following, on the one hand, the evolution of reference scenarios and stakeholder expectations and, on the other, by pursuing an ever increasing integration of Environment, Social and Governance (ESG) factors into its business strategy and in the development and adaptation of business processes, also in order to meet the legislative, regulatory and standard requirements of the context in which the Company operates.

Saipem stakeholders, to various degrees and in various capacities, are engaged and periodically informed of the Company's programmes and performance on issues of sustainability, in order to show how the various activities and initiatives contribute to the achievement of the Company's short, medium and long term objectives. In order to respond in a detailed and timely manner to the expectations of its stakeholders and to identify the sustainability issues that are priorities for them, Saipem has developed, in addition to its other engagement methods, a materiality analysis process following direct consultation with all categories of stakeholders in the Company.

This process was carried out in 2022 in accordance with the methodology set out in the GRI Standards 2021, the relevant national legislation (Legislative Decree No. 254/2016) and the indications of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (EU CSRD Directive 2022/2464 of December 14, 2022). The latter envisages carrying out a materiality analysis according to the impact and financial perspectives – which Saipem introduced already in 2021 in advance of the directive's requirements – aimed at highlighting both the material issues for which Saipem generates the greatest impact towards the environment and civil society, and those that are most likely to affect the Company's ability to create value for stakeholders. Saipem's materiality analysis, which has been conducted annually for the last eleven years, represents a fundamental engagement activity towards all categories of corporate stakeholders, both external and internal (Board of Directors, management and employees) and is supplemented by analyses of benchmarking, of the regulatory framework, and trends of emerging sustainability issues.

As reported in detail in the "2022 Consolidated Non-Financial Statement - NFS" (see page 86 of the NFS or page 24 of the Sustainability Report), the assessment saw the direct involvement of approximately 2,300 stakeholders, including the members of the Board of Directors, and customers, finance, institutions, suppliers, local communities, academia and opinion makers; the results were presented in a dedicated session of the following Board Committees: Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance (December 5, 2022) and Audit and Risk Committee (November 30, 2022), as well as the Board of Directors (January 25, 2023), which shared and validated the results.

The material topics identified are used both for strategic planning and for the definition of the contents of the corporate disclosure on sustainability (NFS and Sustainability Report).

Specifically, in 2022 Saipem prepared the 2022-2025 Sustainability Plan "Energy for a Sustainable Future", which considered the material issues of 2021 and aims to implement an integrated strategy that combines business and financial objectives of the Plan with a series of ESG factors, in the short and long term, towards which the Company shall focus competencies and development and on which it shall base its brand purpose "Engineering for a Sustainable Future".

The Plan is divided into 12 strategic ESG areas, indicating specific objectives and related implementation programmes for each:

  • ≥ Net-Zero;
  • ≥ Biodiversity;
  • ≥ Carbon Neutral construction yard;
  • ≥ Human capital;
  • ≥ Diversity and Inclusion;
  • ≥ Health and Safety;
  • ≥ Local impact;
  • ≥ Supply chain;
  • ≥ Business ethics;
  • ≥ Cybersecurity;
  • ≥ Risk management;
  • ≥ Innovation.

It therefore represents Saipem's framework on sustainability issues and was submitted to the Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance Committee for review and discussion and approved by the Board of Directors at its meeting on July 12, 2022.

A key part of the Plan focuses on the Net-Zero Programme, which uses a governance structure based on a central Sponsor and a Programme Manager (PM). The Programme Group consists of cross-functional staff and operational functions (each operational line has its own sponsor and PM). In addition, a Steering Committee consisting of the CEO and top management has been appointed, which is periodically informed of progress and drives strategic directions. The Net-Zero Programme in December 2021 received its first third-party validation from the certification body Bureau Veritas, attesting the methodological robustness of the Programme and defines the next steps.

The Sustainability Model and governance, therefore, are based on:

  • a) a corporate mission, values and principles set forth in Saipem's Code of Ethics and the Policies that govern corporate life towards its internal and external stakeholders;
  • b) an organisation that assigns roles and responsibilities (for instance setting objectives for executives and management).

The Sustainability Model and governance also guide the definition of processes and the preparation of tools ranging from the quantification of the shared value generated by the Company to methodologies for assessing the degree of innovation in backlog projects, the ever-greater integration of risk management, and the definition of strategies geared towards energy transition and sustainable business.

On March 24, 2022, together with the 2021 NFS, in compliance with Legislative Decree No. 254/2016 on non-financial reporting, Saipem's Board of Directors approved the Sustainability Report 2021, a voluntary reporting document focused on the leading role Saipem intends to play in the energy transition. Reflecting the spirit of a pathway to decarbonisation, the document is organised into three stages, defined as: (i) navigating the energy transition; (ii) our vision for decarbonisation; and (iii) at the core of our value.

On June 30, 2022, the Group annual statement pursuant to the "UK Modern Slavery Act" on combating modern forms of slavery was approved by the Board of Directors and published on the Company website.

Saipem's document on combating climate change, prepared since 2017 in line with the guidelines of the Task Force on Climate Related Financial Disclosure (TCFD), was integrated in 2022 into the NFS, which has a large chapter devoted to the issue.

With regard to the governance set-up of sustainability within Saipem, the Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance Committee, chaired by Saipem's Chairman, is responsible for assisting the Board of Directors by fulfilling a preparatory, consultative and advisory role in assessment and decision-making processes with regard to Saipem's business sustainability issues, including environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues connected to the exercise of the business and its engagement with all stakeholders, Saipem's corporate social responsibility, the review of scenarios envisaged in the preparation of the strategic plan, based also on reviewing the relevant issues for the long-term value generation and corporate governance of the Company and the Group. In this context, the Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance Committee is assigned the task of verifying the general definition of the sustainability disclosure, specifically the Sustainability Report, and the articulation of its contents, as well as the completeness and transparency of the information provided, reporting the outcome of its own assessments, through the Chairman, to the Audit and Risk Committee. The latter, as part of its duty to assist the Board of Directors vis-à-vis the Internal Control and Risk Management System, is called upon to assess that the periodic non-financial information, specifically the NFS is a correct representation of the business model, the strategies of the Company, the impact of its activities and the performances achieved, reporting its findings to the Board of Directors.

In 2022, the Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance Committee held meetings on sustainability issues on January 20, February 18, March 4, June 27, September 16 and December 5.

The Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance Committee and the CEO promote the issues of sustainability within the Board of Directors; in 2022, the Board discussed issues arising from the need to approve the above documents at their meetings on March 15 and March 24, 2022, respectively.

From a technical and organisational point of view, the performance of activities and achievement of Saipem's sustainability goals is ensured by the Sustainability function.

With regard to external commitments, Saipem has been a member of the United Nations Global Compact initiative since 2016. The Global Compact initiative directs the commitment of the private sector through the participation (subject to the preliminary assessment and continuous verification by their Secretariat in New York) of the major international companies committing to upholding ten principles centred on human and labour rights, environmental protection and fighting corruption. Consistently with this commitment, Saipem promotes the achievement by 2030 of the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in all the territories in which it operates.

In addition to the awards received from various international institutions and bodies, in 2022, Saipem has been included once more in the Dow Jones Sustainability Index, confirming its leadership in the Energy Equipment & Services sector.

In 2022, Saipem improved its ranking from 10th to 5th place out of 86 companies (of which 67 are listed), in EticaNews' Top 10 Integrated Governance Index (IGI), an index that evaluates companies in relation to key sustainability governance aspects such as the presence of a Sustainability Committee, the existence of a remuneration policy linked to ESG parameters, or the diversity within the Board.

In 2022, Saipem was also confirmed in the new Euronext MIB® ESG index, the first ESG index dedicated to Italian blue-chip companies, based on the assessment of sustainability performance carried out by the Vigeo Eiris agency of the Moody's Group. Finally, Saipem was included for the first time in Bloomberg's Gender Equality Index (GEI), which recognises companies that disclose their commitments and actions to support gender equality through policy development, representation and transparency. GEI is an international index comprising 485 companies, headquartered in 45 countries, operating in 11 industrial sectors, representing about \$16 trillion in terms of market capitalisation.

Code of Ethics

The Code of Ethics, chapter 8 of the Organisation, Management and Control Model pursuant to Legislative Decree No. 231 of 2001 (hereinafter "Model 231"), represents a compulsory general principle and clearly defines, in compliance with the provisions of law, the values that Saipem recognises and accepts, as well as the responsibilities the Company assumes both internally and externally. It imposes fairness, honesty, integrity and transparency of operations, conduct, working practices and relations, both internal and external to the Group.

Compliance with the Code by Saipem's Directors, Statutory Auditors, management and employees, as well as by all those who, within their own remits and responsibilities, operate in Italy and abroad to achieve Saipem's objectives (hereinafter "Saipem's people"), is of paramount importance, not only to guarantee compliance with legal and contractual provisions governing a party's relationship with Saipem, but also to ensure Saipem's efficiency, reliability and reputation, all of which are crucial factors in the Company's success and in improving the social circumstances in which it operates.

The Board of Directors has adopted Saipem Code of Conduct in 1999, with subsequent amendments and integrations, and in 2004 has been repolaced by Model 231, which from 2008 includes the Code of Ethics of Saipem SpA. The Model has been updated by the Board of Directors to reflect the legislative changes that have taken effect over time.

The Code of Ethics provides for the appointment of a Guarantor of the Code of Ethics, whose responsibilities have been delegated to the Compliance Committee and who has been granted "independent powers of initiative and control" pursuant to Article 6, paragraph 1, letter b), of Legislative Decree No. 231/2001 on the administrative liability of legal entities deriving from offences. The duties of the Guarantor include the promotion of information and training initiatives towards Saipem's employees, who are required to observe the principles contained in the Code of Ethics.

The Compliance Committee's mandate coincides with that of the Board of Directors which appointed it. Its autonomy and independence are safeguarded by its composition, pursuant to Article 6, paragraph 1, letter b), of Legislative Decree No. 231/2001. The Compliance Committee is a Collegial Body composed of three external members, one of whom is appointed Chairman of the Compliance Committee: they are chosen among academics and professionals of proven expertise and experience in legal, economic and/or company organisation issues.

The composition of the Compliance Committee, modifications and additions, are approved through a resolution of the Board of Directors, having heard the opinions of the Audit and Risk Committee, of the Compensation and Nomination Committee and of the Board of Statutory Auditors, at the proposal of the CEO, and in agreement with the Chairman.

The Board of Directors on December 17, 2021 resolved to update, with effect from January 14, 2022, the composition of the Compliance Committee as follows: 3 external members Renato Rordorf (Chairman), Maurizio Bortolotto and Stefania Chiaruttini.

The Compliance Committee relies on the collaboration and support of the corporate functions, which will ensure an adequate flow of information, as well as on the support of the technical Secretariat of the Compliance Committee.

Following the legislative and organisational changes that occurred on July 26, 2022, the Board of Directors approved the latest update of Model 231 (which also includes the Code of Ethics).

Each subsidiary, directly or indirectly, both in Italy and overseas, issues its own Organisational, Management and Control Model ("OMC Model") containing the Code of Ethics, which formally nominates a Guarantor of the Code of Ethics.

Saipem is committed to ensuring the widest dissemination of the principles and contents of the Code of Ethics among Saipem's personnel and other stakeholders. All Saipem personnel are required to be conversant with the principles that make up Saipem's Code of Ethics and the relevant procedures regulating their functions and responsibilities.

To promote the knowledge and facilitate the implementation of the Code of Ethics, the Code itself provides for the implementation of a "Code Promotion Team" reporting to the Guarantor of Saipem.

The composition of the team is defined by the CEO of Saipem at the proposal of the Guarantor of the Code of Ethics. The Team is currently made up of 11 members from several departments.

The Team facilitates access throughout Saipem to every possible knowledge and clarification tool that can aid the interpretation and implementation of the Code of Ethics.

The Code of Ethics is posted on Saipem's noticeboards and on the Company's intranet and website, both in Italian and English. Furthermore, particularly well-organised is the training of personnel both at head office and in foreign subsidiaries, through class courses or e-learning.

With these initiatives, the Board of Directors further strengthened the internal control system, with the firm conviction that the Company's business activities, whose aim is the creation of value for its shareholders, must be founded on the principle of fair conduct towards all stakeholders (comprising, besides the shareholders, employees, suppliers, clients, commercial and financial partners, in addition to the communities the Group comes into contact with in the countries where it is present). Furthermore, extremely important are social initiatives promoted by Group companies striving to foster among stakeholders the awareness that only a business approach that seizes the opportunities and manages the risks resulting from economic, environmental and social development can generate long-term value for all parties involved.

In view of improving the dissemination of the principles detailed in the Code of Ethics and Model 231, in 2016 Saipem also published on its intranet site, the "Saipem Guide to Business Integrity", whose objective is to provide Saipem employees with an additional instrument that is both easy to read and consult and that will also help everyone understand and share Saipem's ethical values. This guide provides an overview of the principles and reference policies, as well as clarification and some practical cases described in the "What to do if" section. This guide is not meant to replace the Code of Ethics, Model 231 or the procedures; it is intended to aid their comprehension. During 2021, an updated version of the "Saipem Guide to Business Integrity" was published.

From 2020, in order to study and understand some very important topics, identify their critical aspects and possible solutions, four videos have been published on the Company intranet and on the Stream platform as part of the Explore Integrity campaign. They are all subtitled in English, Italian, French and Portuguese. In particular, the aforementioned videos relate to the following topics: "Conflict of interest", "Passive corruption", "Active corruption" and "Discrimination".

Shareholding structure (pursuant to Article 123-bis, paragraph 1, of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998) as at December 31, 2022

Share capital distribution (pursuant to Article 123-bis, paragraph 1, letter a), of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998)

At December 31, 2022, Saipem share capital amounted to €501,669,790.83, fully paid-up and comprising No. 1,995,557,732 ordinary shares, equal to 99.999% of the share capital, and No. 10,059 savings shares, equal to 0.001% of the share capital, all without par value and listed on Euronext Milan Exchange managed by Borsa Italiana SpA (see Table 1 on page 63). Shares cannot be split and each share carries the entitlement of one vote. Saipem's shareholders enjoy, and are limited by, all relevant rights afforded by law.

Savings shares are convertible at par with ordinary shares, without charges or time restrictions; and they enjoy a higher dividend than ordinary shares. Specifically, following the Shareholders' Meeting held on December 2, 2015: (i) savings shares are allotted dividends on net income reported in the regularly approved financial statements, after a deduction posted to the legal reserve of up to €0.05 for each savings share; (ii) after allotment of the privileged dividend to savings shares as per point (i), residual income, as resolved by the Shareholders' Meeting, is apportioned amongst all shares, so that savings shares receive a higher overall dividend than ordinary shares, of up to €0.03 for each savings share; (iii) if savings shares are allocated a lower dividend than that indicated under (i) or (ii) during a certain fiscal year, the difference will be added to the privileged dividend over the following two fiscal years.

On May 17, 2022, the Savings Shareholders' Meeting appointed Roberto Ramorini as their collective representative for three years, replacing Augusto Clerici Bagozzi whose mandate had expired.

No share-based incentive plans have been issued that may give way to (free or otherwise) share capital increases. As at December 31, 2022, Saipem held No. 415,957, treasury shares, equal to 0.02% of the ordinary share capital. On March 14, 2023, the Board of Directors resolved, at the proposal of the Compensation and Nomination Committee, to submit to the Shareholders' Meeting a proposal to authorise the purchase of up to a maximum of 37,000,000 ordinary treasury shares for the maximum total outlay of €59,300,000, to cover the 2023 award of the 2023-2025 Long-Term Incentive Plan, subject to approval of the plan itself by the Shareholders' Meeting.

Restrictions on transfer of shares (pursuant to Article 123-bis, paragraph 1, letter b), of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998)

No restrictions exist on the transfer of shares

Relevant shareholdings (pursuant to Article 123-bis, paragraph 1, letter c), of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998)

Based on information contained in the Shareholders' Register and notification received pursuant to Article 120 of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998, hereafter are all significant direct and/or indirect shareholdings in Saipem's share capital at December 31, 2022.

From notifications received pursuant to current legislation, the following shareholders own a stake in Saipem SpA in excess of 3%, and are not exempt from disclosure under Article 119-bis of Consob Regulation 11971/1999 (see also Table 1 "Shareholding structure" on page 63 of this Report):

Shareholders Shares held % of capital
Eni SpA 622,476,192 31.19
CDP Equity SpA 255,841,728 12.82

Shareholders by geographical area, following the 2022 capital increase

Shareholders Number of shareholders Shares held % of capital
Italy 61,856 1,813,943,827 (*) 90.9
Other EU-member States 245 20,305,726 1.017
Americas 129 45,386,503 2.274
UK and Ireland 144 102,065,823 5.115
Other European States 177 12,512,985 0.627
Rest of the world 76 1,343,927 0.067
Total 62,627 1,995,558,791 100.0

(*) Includes No.415,957 treasury shares.

Shareholders by number of shares held, following the 2022 capital increase

Shareholders Number of shareholders Shares held % of capital
≥ 10% 2 878,317,920 44.014
≥ 3% 1 59,705,478 2.993
1% - 3% 3 50,540,175 2.532
0.5% - 1% 5 41,878,164 2.099
0.1% - 0.5% 21 42,128,368 2.111
≤ 0.1% 62,594 922,572,729 46.231
Treasury shares 1 415,957 0.020
Total 62,627 1,995,558,791 100.0

Shares with special control rights (pursuant to Article 123-bis, paragraph 1, letter d), of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998)

All shareholders enjoy the same rights.

Shareholding of employees: exercise of voting rights (pursuant to Article 123-bis, paragraph 1, letter e), of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998)

Employees holding Saipem's shares enjoy the same voting rights as ordinary shareholders.

Voting rights restrictions (pursuant to Article 123-bis, paragraph 1, letter f), of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998)

No restrictions exist on voting rights.

Shareholders' agreements (pursuant to Article 123-bis, paragraph 1, letter g), of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998)

On January 22, 2022, a new agreement came into force, which was signed on January 20, 2022 between Eni SpA and CDP Industria SpA (now CDP Equity SpA). This agreement concerns the renewal of the Shareholders' Agreement (the "Agreement") – in place between the same Parties – involving ordinary shares of Saipem ("Syndicated Shares"), signed on October 27, 2015 and tacitly renewed for a three-year period on January 22, 2019. The Agreement remains essentially unchanged from the previous version, although, some simplifications have been introduced and some changes have been made to update the text and adapt it to the regulatory context and to the application practice.

On July 20, 2022, the Parties signed a deed which updated the Agreement, pursuant to which the Parties acknowledged the change in the total number of Syndicated Shares, as, following the execution of the above transactions on Saipem's capital, the percentage of the Syndicated Shares contributed to the Agreement by each Party with respect to the number of ordinary shares representing Saipem's ordinary share capital (amounting to approximately 12.503%) remained unchanged with respect to what was indicated in the Agreement and previously disclosed to the market.

Lastly, it should be noted that the merger by incorporation of CDP Industria SpA into CDP Equity SpA ("CDP Equity"), both of which are wholly and directly owned subsidiaries of Cassa Depositi e Prestiti SpA ("CDP"), became effective on December 31, 2022. Therefore, also effective as of December 31, 2022, CDP Equity took over the Agreement in place of CDP Industria SpA and in all the rights and obligations previously held by the latter pursuant to the Agreement itself, by signing an appropriate letter of takeover.

The full text of the essential information of the Shareholders' Agreement is available on the website www.saipem.com (section "Governance Documents").

Change of control clauses (pursuant to Article 123-bis, paragraph 1, letter h), of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998)

Whenever significant agreements are entered into, modified or extinguished in the event of a change of control of the Company (Article 123-bis, paragraph 1, letter h), of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998), the following two types of clauses apply in relation to financing and bank and/or insurance guarantees:

  • 1) current financing subject to change of control clauses, which, at December 31, 2022, amounted to a total of €2,444 million.
  • In detail, on that date, the following bank financing were in place for a total value of €444 million:
  • ≥ approximately €195 million had been drawn down on the original €554 million export credit line taken out in 2016 with the guarantee of the Norwegian agency Garantiinstituttet for Eksportkreditt GIEK (now Export Finance Norway - Eksfin);
  • ≥ approximately €137 million has been drawn down on the original €260 million export credit line taken out in 2017 with the guarantee of the Dutch agency Atradius;
  • ≥ further bank loans were also drawn down for a total of €112 million, of which: €37 million on a line taken out in 2018, and €75 million on a line taken out in 2020.

Should Saipem cease to be controlled by the Italian Ministry of Economy and Finance, and/or Eni SpA and/or Cassa Depositi e Prestiti SpA, the financing banks shall have the right to renegotiate in good faith, within 30 to 45 days, any changes to the terms of the agreement; banks which do not wish to pursue the financing will have the right to request the early reimbursement of their quota within 30 to 45 days from the expiry of the previous term.

Also, at December 31, 2022, the following transactions have been put in place by Saipem under its EMTN (Euro Medium Term Note) program, for a total value of €2,000 million:

  • ≥ a fixed-rate bond issue for a total nominal value of €500 million, maturing after 7 years, placed in 2016;
  • ≥ a fixed-rate bond issue for a total nominal value of €500 million, maturing after 7 years, placed in 2017;
  • ≥ a fixed-rate bond issue for a total nominal value of €500 million, maturing after 6 years, placed in 2020;

≥ a fixed-rate bond issue for a total nominal value of €500 million, maturing after 7 years, placed in 2021. Should Saipem cease to be controlled by the Italian Ministry of Economy and Finance, and/or Eni SpA and/or Cassa Depositi e Prestiti SpA and should this change of control cause the rating agencies to downgrade Saipem-issued bonds to below certain levels1, the owners of Saipem-issued bonds have the right to request the early repayment of bonds.

2) Bank and/or insurance guarantees subject to change of control clauses, which, at December 31, 2022, amounted to a total of €2,788 million.

For these guarantees, it is generally provided that, should a change of control occur, third-party credit institutions may discuss in good faith new commercial terms to be applied to existing guarantees or request that within 30 days: (a) replacement of existing guarantees with new ones issued by a different credit institution, (b) receipt of a suitable indemnification from a different credit institution or (c) a deposit for the same amount.

Statutory provisions for takeover bids (Article 104, paragraph 1-ter and Article 104-bis, paragraph 1), of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998)

In terms of takeover bids, Saipem's Articles of Association comply with the provisions of the Passivity Rule set forth in Article 104, paragraphs 1 and 1-bis of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998, and do not provide for the application of the breakthrough provisions set forth in Article 104-bis, paragraphs 2 and 3 of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998.

Indemnification for Directors in case of dismissal (without just cause), resignation or termination following a takeover bid

In compliance with the provisions of the Report on Remuneration Policy and Compensation Paid, approved by the Board of Directors on April 11, 2022 and over which the Shareholders' Meeting expressed in favour on May 17,

(1) Refer to rating reduction to "non-investment grade" if rating was "investment grade" at the time of the change of control, or any rating reduction if rating was "non-investment grade" at the time of the change of control.

2022, the Company entered into an agreement with the CEO and General Manager, appointed by the Board of Directors on August 31, 2022. This agreement provides:

  • ≥ the payment of an all-inclusive indemnity in the event of consensual termination of employment upon the expiry of the current mandate without renewing the position of Chief Executive Officer, or in the event of consensual termination of employment before the expiry of the current mandate. The indemnity will not be due in the event of disciplinary dismissal as governed by Article 2122 of the Italian Civil Code: revocation for just cause from the office of director; performance of work on behalf of shareholders exercising joint control over Saipem or their subsidiaries (in Italy or abroad) within 12 months of termination of employment with Saipem and against specific remuneration; resignation from the position of Chief Executive Officer and General Manager before the expiry of the mandate and not justified by the following causes: substantial reduction of powers, with reference to both the economic quantification of powers and their scope or affecting the position; sale, transfer for consideration or free of charge and any other deed of sale of shares and debt securities, of any kind, resulting in a change of control for Saipem pursuant to Article 2359 of the Italian Civil Code. The indemnity is defined in accordance with the recommendations of the Corporate Governance Code and the Code of Listed Companies and may not exceed the amount equal to 2-year fixed remuneration plus average short-term variable remuneration at target;
  • ≥ a non-competition agreement in consideration of the absolute international importance of the professional and managerial profile of the CEO and General Manager in the sector, as well as the institutional and business relations built globally. The Company has the option to activate the non-competition agreement against the payment of a fee to compensate the commitment taken by the Chief Executive Officer and General Manager not to carry out, for the twelve months from termination of employment, any activity in certain territories, sectors and companies that are in competition with the activities carried out by Saipem. Violation of the non-competition agreement entails the failure to pay the consideration, as well as the obligation, as a penalty, to compensate the damage as set by consensus and convention, without prejudice to Saipem's right to request specific compliance and increased compensation for damages.

The compensation described above may not exceed the amount equal to 2-year fixed remuneration plus average short-term variable remuneration at target.

No severance payments (before or upon expiry) for the other Saipem Board Directors are envisaged.

Further details are provided in the paragraph relating to the Chief Executive Officer entitled "Ancillary remuneration instruments" in Section I of the "Report on Remuneration Policy and Compensation Paid" pursuant to Article 123-ter of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998.

Directors' appointment or replacement and modifications to the Articles of Association

Procedures regulating the appointment of Board Directors are illustrated under the item "Board of Directors" (refer to page 24, under paragraph "Appointment and replacement").

The Board of Directors has the power to amend the Articles of Association in order to comply with the provisions of law and has all powers granted by Article 2365 of the Italian Civil Code, and Article 20 of Articles of Association (see paragraph "Board of Directors' role" on page 21).

On February 25, 2020, the then Board of Directors approved an amendment to the Articles of Association to comply with the most recent gender balance regulations in the management and control bodies of listed companies (Law No. 160 dated December 27, 2019), through the cancellation of Article 31 (transitory clause) of the Articles of Association.

Share capital increases and buy-back of treasury shares (pursuant to Article 123-bis, paragraph 1, letter m), of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998)

On September 1, 2022, Saipem treasury shares were granted free of charge to the assignees of the Long-Term Incentive Plan 2016-2018 - 2017 allocation, following the end of the co-investment period (31,961 shares) and 2018 implementation (490 shares). The number of treasury shares held by the Company as at December 31, 2022 was 415,957, equal to 0.02% of ordinary shares.

In the 2023 Remuneration Policy Saipem will reintroduce a stock-based Long-Term Variable Incentive Plan, in relation to which a proposal to purchase treasury shares will be submitted to the Shareholders' Meeting due to take place on May 3, 2023.

Further information is available in the "2023 Report on Remuneration Policy and Compensation Paid".

Direction and coordination (pursuant to Article 2497 and subsequent of the Italian Civil Code)

The new shareholding structure, resulting from the Shareholders' Agreement between Eni SpA and FSI (currently CDP Equity SpA), "aimed at creating a joint control of Saipem by Eni and FSI", meant that from January 22, 2016 Saipem is no longer subject to the direction and control of Eni SpA pursuant to Article 2497 of the Italian Civil Code. Pursuant to the current Shareholders' Agreement, Saipem is subject to the joint control of Eni SpA and CDP Equity SpA.

The content of the Shareholders' Agreement is given in section "Shareholder Agreements (pursuant to Article 123-bis of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998).

Compliance with the Corporate Governance Code (pursuant to Article 123-bis, paragraph 2, letter a), first part, of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998)

Saipem's governance system is based on the best international practices and, in particular, on the principles set forth in the Corporate Governance Code, approved by the Corporate Governance Committee of the Italian Stock Exchange – which companies have to apply from January 1, 2021 by informing the market in the 2022 Report on Corporate Governance and Shareholding Structure – as well as on the relevant provisions set forth in the regulatory framework issued by the National Commission for Companies and the Stock Exchange (Consob).

At their meeting of December 17, 2020, the then Board of Directors approved the compliance to the principles of the Corporate Governance Code, drawing up an action plan aimed at ensuring their implementation.

In application of the aforementioned principles:

a) at the CEO's proposal, Saipem's Board of Directors sets the strategies and objectives of the Company and the Group, including the sustainability policies. For Saipem, sustainability represents the way to conduct its business to create value for its stakeholders and a pillar of its strategy in the era of the energy transition. In this context, the Sustainability Scenarios and Governance Committee carries out preliminary and advisory functions to the Board of Directors (please refer to page 35, paragraph "Additional Committees (other than those provided for by the legislation or recommended by the Code"), concerning evaluations and decisions relating to sustainability issues, as well as environmental, social & governance issues, connected to its business and engagement with all stakeholders, corporate social responsibility, the review of scenarios for the preparation of the strategic plan, also analysing the issues relevant to the generation of long-term value, and the corporate governance of the Company and the Group. b) Saipem is committed to providing maximum transparency towards investors and the financial community, by building, maintaining and developing an active relationship of trust with them, which benefits both the investors themselves and the Company, with a view to creating value in the medium to long term. On February 20, 2022, the Company adopted a Policy for managing the engagement with investors (please refer to page 56, paragraph "Relations with shareholders") aimed at clearly defining the methods and the characteristics of the engagement between Saipem's current and potential shareholders and the Board of Directors.

c) Saipem's Board of Directors, appointed by the Shareholders' Meeting on April 30, 20212, is made up of 9 directors (of which one is an executive director, the Chief Executive Officer and General Manager) who possess the necessary professional profiles and experience to deal with and effectively manage the challenges facing the foreseeable evolution of the sector and the market. The composition of the Board of Directors ensures compliance with the current legislation on gender balance (please refer to page 27, paragraph "Criteria and policies on diversity") and a fair number of independent directors, to stimulate an open and attentive debate to all stakeholders (5 out of 9 directors possess the independence requisites envisaged by Legislative Decree No. 58/1998 and by the Corporate Governance Code to which Saipem complies, as fully described on page 32, paragraph "Independent Directors", of this Report). On February 23, 2022, the Board of Directors, in accordance with the provisions of the Corporate Governance Code, defined the circumstances that compromise or appear to compromise the independence of the Chairman of the Board of Directors and the Directors.

d) Saipem adopts the necessary safeguards to ensure that the documentation is sent prior to Board meetings, whose timeliness, completeness and ease of access are acknowledged both in the results of the Board review and in the Regulations of the Board of Directors, adopted by the Board of Directors at their meeting of January 20, 2021 and further updated on February 23, 2022 (please refer to page 29, paragraph "Functioning of the Board of Directors").

e) The then Saipem Board of Directors, in view of the renewal of the Board of Directors itself and in line with the provisions of Recommendation No. 23 of the Corporate Governance Code, on February 24, 2021, with the favourable opinion of the Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance Committee, approved the "Recommendations by the Board of Directors to Saipem Shareholders on the Quantitative and Qualitative Composition of the New Board of Directors".

At their same meeting of February 24, 2021, the then Board of Directors, to align the governance of the Company with the provisions of the Corporate Governance Code and with the favourable opinion of the respective Committees, had approved the updated versions of the Regulations of the internal Board Committees. At their meeting of June 30, 2021, the Board of Directors appointed by the Shareholders' Meeting on April 30, 2021 approved the new version of the Regulations presented by the internal Board Committees appointed by the Board

(2) It should be noted that on August 31, 2022 the executive and non-independent Director Francesco Caio, Chief Executive Officer and General Manager of the Company, resigned, as did the non-independent and non-executive Director and Member of the Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance Committee, Pier Francesco Ragni. The latter was immediately replaced on August 31, 2022 with the appointment by co-optation of Alessandro Puliti, already General Manager of the Company since February 4, 2022, who was also appointed by Saipem's Board of Directors on the same date as Chief Executive Officer and General Manager of Saipem. In addition, the Board of Directors on October 26, 2022 co-opted Davide Manunta to the position of non-independent and non-executive Director and member of the Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance Committee. Both the Chief Executive Officer and General Manager, Alessandro Puliti, and Davide Manunta, will remain in office until the date of the next Saipem Shareholders' Meeting called to approve the Consolidated Annual Financial Report as of December 31, 2022.

of Directors on May 18, 2021. The four Committees (Compensation and Nomination Committee, Audit and Risk Committee, Related Parties Committee and Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance Committee) carry out preliminary and consultative functions for the Board of Directors and their composition reflects the Recommendations of the Corporate Governance Code (further details on this subject, please refer to the paragraphs dedicated to each Committee).

f) With regard to the Board Review, the outcome of the second-year's mandate is illustrated in the dedicated paragraph on page 36 of this Report.

g) The compensation set for Directors by the Shareholders' Meeting of April 30, 2021 and those set by the Board of Directors on May 18, 2021 to address the participation in the Committees are consistent with the commitment required by the Company for the performance of their office. The Report on the Remuneration Policy and compensation paid by Saipem in compliance with the recommendations of the Corporate Governance Code provides greater disclosure regarding actual results, illustrates how the Remuneration Policy contributes to the corporate strategy and the pursuit of long-term goals, adopts both financial and non-financial performance targets for variable remuneration, provides evidence of the procedure applied to exemptions and provides appropriate disclosure on the historical changes in the remuneration of directors, employees and Saipem's performance.

At their meeting of February 21, 2023, the Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance Committee, as previously mentioned, analysed this Report on Corporate Governance and Shareholding Structure ensuring that the Company's Corporate Governance is substantially in line with the Corporate Governance Code. The conclusions of the Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance Committee were shared with the Board of Directors during the Board meeting of March 14, 2023.

This Report was prepared utilising the Corporate Governance and Shareholding Structure Report format of Borsa Italiana SpA (9th Edition - January 2022)3. The Company strives to provide correct, exhaustive and effective information consistent with the characteristics of its business activities and corporate objectives, and in line with market requirements.

Saipem and its subsidiaries are not subject to any non-Italian legal requirements that may influence the Corporate Governance of the Issuer.

Board of Directors

Board of Directors' role

The Board of Directors is the central body in the governance system of Saipem and the Saipem Group.

Article 20 of the Articles of Association requires that the Company be managed exclusively by the Board of Directors.

The Board of Directors plays a fundamental role of direction, which was also highlighted in the 2022 Board review (see page 36, under section "Board review and succession of Directors - Nomination Committee, Board Review"). Based on the Board of Directors' resolution of December 13, 2022, the Board of Directors:

a) leads the Company by pursuing its sustainable success and, consistently with this objective;

  • ≥ defines, at the proposal of the Chief Executive Officer, the strategic lines and objectives of the Company and the Group, including their sustainability policies, and monitors their implementation;
  • ≥ defines the system and the most functional rules of Corporate Governance for the Company and the Group for the performance of the business and the pursuit of its strategies, taking into account the autonomy of Group companies. If necessary, it evaluates and promotes appropriate changes, submitting them, when applicable, to the Shareholders' Meeting;
  • ≥ promotes, in the most appropriate forms, the engagement with shareholders and other important stakeholders of the Company and the Group.

For these purposes, specifically, the Board of Directors

    1. the structure of the Group headed by the Company; defines the fundamental guidelines of the organisational, administrative and accounting structure of the Company, including the Internal Control and Risk Management System, for the subsidiaries and the Group;
    1. establishes the Internal Committees of the Board of Directors, with investigative, propositive and advisory functions, appointing their members and Chairmen, establishing their duties and remuneration and approving their regulations and expense budgets; receives from the Board Committees, at the first useful meeting and periodically on a half-yearly basis, a report on their activities;
    1. adopts, in compliance with the provisions of the Corporate Governance Code, regulations governing the operation of the Board of Directors and Board Committees, including the procedures for taking minutes of meetings and the management of Board documentation; approves, at the Chairman's proposal, the appointment and dismissal of the Secretary of the Board of Directors, defines their professional requirements and grants them powers in the Board's Regulations;
    1. defines, grants and revokes powers to the Directors, defining their limits and methods of exercise and determining, having reviewed the proposals of the Compensation and Nomination Committee and liaising with the Board of Statutory Auditors, the remuneration commensurate with the powers; may issue directives to the

(3) The Corporate Governance and Shareholding Structure Report format of Borsa Italiana SpA, 9th Edition (January 2022), is available at www.borsaitaliana.it.

delegated bodies and revoke transactions falling within the scope of its powers; receives information from Directors with executive powers at Board of Directors' Meetings, at least quarterly, regarding activities within their responsibility and major transactions carried out by the Company or the Group;

    1. identifies, within its members, one or more Directors in charge of establishing and maintaining the Internal Control and Risk Management System, pursuant to the Corporate Governance Code;
    1. approves the Corporate Governance and Shareholding Structure Report, subject to the opinion of the Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance Committee;
    1. approves the fundamental guidelines and framework of the internal regulatory system, the compliance with the Policies and Management System Guidelines and, subject to the opinion of the Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance Committee, the governance Policies and Management System Guidelines; it approves the Company's Organisational, Management and Control Model pursuant to Legislative Decree No. 231/2001, as amended, which includes the Code of Ethics;
    1. subject to the positive opinion of the Related Parties Committee, adopts procedures that ensure the transparency and substantive and procedural fairness of transactions with related parties and transactions in which a Director or Statutory Auditor may hold an interest, on their own behalf or on behalf of third parties, assessing on an annual basis whether a review is necessary;
    1. to ensure the proper management of corporate information, adopts, at the Chairman's proposal, in agreement with the Chief Executive Officer, and subject to the opinion of the Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance Committee, a procedure for the internal management and external disclosure of documents and information concerning the Company, with particular reference to significant and inside information;
    1. adopts, at the Chairman's proposal, in agreement with the Chief Executive Officer, a policy for managing the shareholder engagement, also taking into account the engagement policies adopted by institutional investors and asset managers, and describes such policy in the Corporate Governance Report, after consulting with the Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance Committee; ensures that the relevant corporate functions and the Chief Executive Officer identify the persons heading the department responsible for managing relations with shareholders and investors;
    1. expresses its recommendations, at the proposal of the Compensation and Nomination Committee, on:
  • a) the maximum number of Directorships and/or Auditor posts that can be held at listed companies in regulated markets (both in Italy and abroad), at financial companies, banks, insurance companies or companies of a relevant size, which is deemed compatible with the efficient performance of their office of Board Director of Saipem, also in view of their serving on Board Committees;
  • b) prior to the appointment of the Board of Directors by the Shareholders' Meeting, the quantitative and qualitative composition that it deems the new Board of Directors should have, taking into account the results of the Board review. It sets, at least at the beginning of its mandate, the quantitative and qualitative criteria used to assess the importance of commercial, financial and professional relationships, as well as any additional remuneration received for the office/participation in Committees that may compromise the independence of the Directors under the Corporate Governance Code;
    1. assesses the adequacy of the organisational, administrative and accounting structure of the Company, of the strategically relevant subsidiaries and the Group, concerning in particular the internal control and risk management system;
    1. at the proposal of the CEO, subject to the approval of the Compensation and Nomination Committee and the Audit and Risk Committee, and having consulted with the Board of Statutory Auditors, it appoints the members to the Audit and Compliance Committee to be submitted for approval at the Shareholders' Meeting of major subsidiaries, so that they can be appointed to the management bodies of the same companies. Major subsidiaries are identified according to an internal classification system approved by the Board of Directors as "Cluster A" companies;
    1. having received the opinion of the Audit and Risk Committee, it assesses the nature and risk level compatible with the strategic goals of the Company, evaluating all elements that could be important for the sustainable success of the Company and defines the aggregate risk position that the Company is prepared to take during the commercial phase in order to achieve its strategic objectives (so-called "Industrial Risk Appetite - Commercial Phase");
    1. having reviewed the proposals from the Director responsible for setting up and maintaining the Internal Control and Risk Management System and the opinion of the Audit and Risk Committee, it sets guidelines for the Internal Control and Risk Management System, consistently with the Company' strategy, periodically reviewing their adequacy against the business characteristics, the risk profile and its effectiveness, to ensure that main risks facing the Company and its subsidiaries are adequately identified, measured, monitored and properly managed. It also ascertains that these risks are compatible with the business model required to achieve its strategic objectives;
    1. subject to the opinion of the Audit and Risk Committee, it (i) examines main business risks, in consideration of the peculiarities of the operations carried out by Saipem and its subsidiaries, submitted to the Director responsible for setting up and maintaining the Internal Control and Risk Management System at least every six months and (ii) evaluates every six months the adequacy and effectiveness of the Internal Control and Risk Management System against the characteristics and the risk profile of the business;
    1. it defines the principles concerning the coordination and flows of information between the various parties involved in the Internal Control and Risk Management System to maximise the efficiency of the system itself, reduce duplication of activities and ensure the effective performance of the duties of the control body;
    1. subject to the opinion of the Audit and Risk Committee and having consulted the Board of Statutory Auditors and the Director responsible for setting up and maintaining the Internal Control and Risk Management System and the Chairman, it approves, at least annually, the audit program prepared by the Director responsible for the Internal Audit function. The Board also reviews, subject to the opinion of the Audit and Risk Committee and having consulted the Board of Statutory Auditors and the CEO, the findings of the Legal Auditors in their letter of suggestions, if any, and their additional report sent to the control body;
    1. examines and approves the budgets, the strategic, industrial and financial plans of the Company and of the Group, also in consideration of the relevant issues for the generation of long-term value; this review is carried out with the support of the Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance Committee, periodically monitoring their implementation;
    1. examines and approves, with the support of the Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance Committee, the plan and budget for local community initiatives and not-for-profit operations of the Company and the Group;
    1. examines and approves the Annual Report which includes the preliminary consolidated and statutory financial statements, the interim and half-year reports, as per current legislation. It examines and approves the sustainability reporting not included in the Annual Report;
    1. at the proposal of the Compensation and Nomination Committee, reviews and approves the Remuneration Report and, specifically, it drafts, by means of a transparent procedure, the policy for the remuneration of Directors and Senior Managers with strategic responsibilities, to be submitted for approval to the Shareholders' Meeting called to approve the financial statements. Pursuant to this policy, at the proposal of the Compensation and Nomination Committee and having received the opinion of the Board of Statutory Auditors, it sets the remuneration of the CEO and Directors with particular powers. The Board, having reviewed the proposals put forward by the Compensation and Nomination Committee, also sets the criteria for the fixed and variable remuneration, including additional remuneration tools (namely compensation in the event of termination of employment, stability and non-competition agreements) of the top management of the Company and the Group; it implements incentive plans based on stock or other financial instruments approved by the Shareholders' Meeting; it ensures that the remuneration paid and accrued is consistent with the principles and criteria defined in the policy, in light of actual results and other circumstances relevant to its implementation;
    1. evaluates the general management and performance of the Company and the Group, based on the information received at least quarterly from Directors with executive powers, paying particular attention to situation of conflict of interest and transactions with related parties, comparing actual interim and yearly results against budget forecasts;
    1. approves, having received a positive opinion from the Related Parties Committee, transactions of greater importance with related parties, in compliance with the relevant procedure; it receives, at least quarterly, from the CEO, a report detailing transactions of greater and lesser importance, in line with the provisions of the aforementioned procedure. The Board reviews and grants preliminary approval to transactions that involve interests held by Board Directors and Statutory Auditors, pursuant to Article 2391 of the Italian Civil Code and the provisions of the aforementioned procedure;
    1. approves the transactions carried out by the Company and expresses an opinion on those of the subsidiaries, without prejudice to their autonomy of management, on the most significant and strategic economic and/or financial transactions for the Company and the Group. The following are considered significant transactions:
  • a) contracts for the realisation of works and/or the provision of services with: (i) a risk profile exceeding the level set in compliance with the Industrial Risk Appetite - Commercial Phase method approved by the Board of Directors; (ii) a value in excess of €750 million;
  • b) capital expenditure, barring: (i) investments as approved in the annual budget; (ii) operational maintenance of company assets; (iii) mandatory class reinstatement upgrades of vessels; (iv) investments fully included in the bidding price of commercial initiatives; and (v) investments whose value is below €25 million;
  • c) contracts for the purchase of goods, other than real estate, registered movable property and those intended for investment, and/or services, or subcontracts, whose value exceeds €500 million, excluding inter-Group company transactions;
  • d) acquisition or disposal, in any capacity, of holdings and/or branches exceeding €25 million in enterprise value, excluding inter-Group company transactions;
  • e) acquisition or disposal, in any capacity, of real estate and registered movable property for a consideration exceeding €25 million, excluding inter-Group company transactions;
  • f) mergers and/or splits involving companies outwith the Saipem Group;
  • g) incorporation of companies directly owned by the Company and opening of Company branches;
  • h) agency agreements;
  • i) issue of financing in favour of companies where no stake is held or where the stake held is not a controlling stake for amounts exceeding €200 million, if the amount is proportional to the value of the stake owned; or of any amount if the loan is not proportional to the share of the holding;
  • j) contracts with qualified financial institutions for the issuing of surety bonds and other personal guarantees to third parties in the interest of the Company or companies in which a shareholding is held, for amounts exceeding €200 million per single act; or of any amount for the issuing of guarantee bonds in favour of companies where no share is held or where the share held is not a controlling stake if the amount is not proportional to the value of the stake owned;
  • k) issue of surety bonds and other personal guarantees to third parties in the interest of the Company or companies in which a shareholding is held (Parent Company Guarantees) for amounts exceeding €1.5

billion per single act; or of any amount for the issuing of guarantee bonds in favour of companies where no share is held or where the share held is not a controlling stake if the amount is not proportional to the value of the stake owned;

  • l) issue of bonds;
  • m) take on financing for amounts exceeding €300 million per single act or exceeding €1 billion cumulatively over one year;
  • n) issue of collateral securities on the properties of the Company, for amounts exceeding €300 million per single act or exceeding €1 billion cumulatively over one year;
    1. approves possible joint venture agreements, having obtained due diligence reports on potential partners from the relevant internal functions;
    1. appoints and revokes:
  • a) at the Chairman's proposal and in agreement with the CEO and having consulted the Compensation and Nomination Committee, appoints and dismisses General Managers, granting them the relevant powers. Should the CEO be appointed General Manager, it is at the proposal of the Chairman;
  • b) at the Chairman's proposal and in agreement with the CEO, having consulted the Compensation and Nomination Committee and received the opinion of Board of Statutory Auditors, appoints and dismisses the Director responsible for the Company's Financial Reporting, ensuring that he/she is granted adequate powers and resources to carry out the duties he/she is vested with by law, and to ensure that the administrative and accounting procedures he put in place are actually adhered to;
  • c) at the Chairman's proposal and in agreement with the Officer responsible for setting up and managing the Internal Control and Risk Management System, having received the opinion of the Audit and Risk Committee, and consulted the Board of Statutory Auditors, appoints and dismisses the Director responsible for the Internal Audit function ensuring that the latter is granted adequate resources to carry out his responsibilities, setting the remuneration structure in line with the Company's compensation policies; and approves Internal Audit guidelines;
    1. appoints and revokes, at the proposal of the CEO in agreement with the Chairman, subject to the opinions of the Audit and Risk Committee and the Compensation and Nomination Committee, the members of the Compliance Committee, pursuant to Legislative Decree No. 231/2001 et subs (granting it the supervisory powers under Article 6, paragraph 1, letter B), of Legislative Decree No. 231/2001 et subs);
    1. defines, with the support of the Compensation and Nomination Committee, a plan for the succession of the CEO and the Executive Directors, identifying at least the procedures to be applied in the event of early termination. It ascertains the existence of adequate procedures for the succession of the top management;
    1. at the proposal of the CEO, identifies the Senior Managers with Strategic Responsibilities among the persons reporting directly to the Chief Executive Officer or the General Manager who have the power and responsibility, directly or indirectly, for planning, directing and controlling the Group's activities;
    1. drafts the proposals to be submitted to the General Shareholders' Meeting for approval;
    1. carries out all other assessments and activities envisaged for the Board of Directors by the Corporate Governance Code;
    1. reviews and resolves on all other matters that the Chairman or the CEO deem appropriate for the Board of Directors, due to their sensitivity and/or importance.
  • By virtue of the aforementioned role, the Board of Directors, during 2022, inter alia:
  • ≥ updated the Strategic Plan 2022-2025 and approved the financing package to strengthen the Company's financial and capital structure;
  • ≥ updated the organisational structure in the context of the Company's relaunch;
  • ≥ approved Saipem's 2022-2025 Sustainability Plan;
  • ≥ shared the identification of material issues for the sustainability of the Company's business;
  • ≥ resolved to update the definition of Senior Managers with Strategic Responsibilities;
  • ≥ promoted engagement with relevant shareholders and other stakeholders;
  • ≥ carried out the review of the organisational, administrative and accounting structure;
  • ≥ approved the review of powers;
  • ≥ approved, inter alia, the sale of Saipem's entire onshore drilling business to KCA Deutag;
  • ≥ resolved on the transfer of the registered office.

During the meeting of February 27, 2023, the Board of Directors also approved the 2023-2026 Strategic Plan.

Appointment and replacement (pursuant to Article 123-bis, paragraph 1, letter l), of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998)

The appointment of Saipem's Board Directors occurs pursuant to Article 19 of the Articles of Association, through voting lists, in order to ensure the presence of representatives designated by the minority shareholders and guarantee gender balance. The lists are filed at the Company headquarters at least 25 days prior to the Shareholders' Meeting on first or single call and published in accordance with the law and Consob regulations, together with the professional CV of each candidate and a declaration stating that they accept their candidacy to the position and that no grounds exist for ineligibility or incompatibility and that they meet the integrity and independence requirements, if applicable. The lists can be presented by shareholders who, either alone or collectively, hold voting rights equivalent to at least 1% of the entire ordinary share capital, as established by Consob with Consob Resolution No. 76 dated January 30, 2023. The Directors possess the requirements of integrity laid down by the regulatory provisions, as well as the professional requirements and experience necessary to carry out their mandate effectively and efficiently. Lists that feature three, or more than three, candidates must include both genders, in compliance with current legislation on gender balance4. When the number of the leastrepresented gender must, by law, be at least three, the lists from which most Board members are selected must include at least two candidates from the least represented gender.

Seven tenths of Directors are appointed from the list that has obtained the majority of votes (rounded down if necessary). The remaining Directors shall be selected from the other lists, provided they are not in any way, even indirectly, linked with the shareholders who have presented or voted for the list that has obtained the majority of votes. Candidates will be classified in decreasing order according to their respective ratios, and those who have received the higher ratios will be appointed. In the event that more than one candidate obtains the same ratio, the candidate on the list with no Director yet appointed, or on the list with the lowest number of Directors appointed will be elected. If these lists have yet to elect a Director, or if they have already appointed an equal number of Directors, the candidate on the list with the highest number of votes shall be appointed. In the event that the vote is still tied, the Shareholders' Meeting will vote again, but only between the candidates under ballot, and the candidate who receives the majority of votes will be elected.

Should this procedure fail to appoint the minimum number of independent Directors required by the Articles of Association, the ratio of votes is calculated for each candidate from said lists by dividing the votes received by each list by the order number of each candidate. Candidates who do not meet independence requirements with lowest ratios from all lists are replaced, starting from the last one, by independent candidates from the same list (in the order they appear on the list), or by persons who meet the independence requirements appointed by the Shareholders' Meeting through a majority vote as required by law. In the event that candidates from different lists obtain the same ratio, the candidate on the list with the highest number of Directors already appointed will be replaced, or the candidate from the list that received the fewest votes, or should the number of votes be the same, the candidate who obtains the fewest votes by the Shareholders' Meeting in an ad-hoc ballot. Should this procedure fail to meet the requirements of regulations on gender balance, the ratio of votes is to be calculated for each candidate taken from the lists by dividing the votes received by each list by the order number of each candidate. The candidate of the most represented gender with the lowest ratio amongst candidates from all lists is replaced, provided the minimum number of independent Directors is met, by the candidate from the least represented gender with the higher order number in the same list of the replaced candidate, or by a person appointed by the Shareholders' Meeting through a majority vote, as required by law. If candidates from different lists obtain the same minimum ratio, the candidate from the list which has appointed the greater number of Directors is replaced, or the candidate from the list that obtained the fewest votes, or, if votes are equal, the candidate who obtains the fewest votes by the Shareholders' Meeting in an ad-hoc ballot.

This voting procedure is applicable only when the entire Board of Directors is to be renewed. Should the need arise for one or more Directors to be replaced during their mandate, the procedure as per Article 2386 of the Italian Civil Code shall be applied. Should the majority of Directors become unavailable, the entire Board of Directors shall be considered void. A Shareholders' Meeting shall be called by the outgoing Board to elect a new one. In any case, current legislation must be complied with vis-à-vis the minimum number of independent Directors and gender balance quotas.

When the current Board was elected in 2021, two lists of candidates were put forward, one jointly by Eni SpA and CDP Industria SpA (now CDP Equity SpA) (pursuant to the Shareholders' Agreement in force between the two companies) and the other by institutional investors.

Saipem's Board of Directors met on August 31, 2022 and took note of the resignation tendered by the non-executive and non-independent Director and member of the Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance Committee Pier Francesco Ragni.

As a result of the above, the Board of Directors, having obtained the opinion of the Compensation and Nomination Committee and with the approval of the Board of Statutory Auditors, appointed as Director in his place Alessandro Puliti, pursuant to Article 2386, first paragraph of the Italian Civil Code. Mr. Puliti also already held the position of General Manager of the Company.

During the aforementioned meeting, Francesco Caio tendered his resignation, effective immediately, from his positions as member of the Board of Directors and General Manager, thus relinquishing all powers.

The Board of Directors unanimously appointed Alessandro Puliti as Chief Executive Officer (who therefore retained the position of General Manager).

The Company's Board of Directors met on October 26, 2022, having obtained the opinion of the Compensation and Nomination Committee and with the approval of the Board of Statutory Auditors, appointed by co-optation Davide Manunta as non-executive and non-independent Director, pursuant to Article 2386, first paragraph, of the Italian Civil Code. Mr. Manunta was also appointed as member of the Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance Committee.

The nomination of the non-independent and non-executive Director Davide Manunta, appointed by co-optation based on independent evaluations by the Board of Directors on October 26, 2022, to replace the non-independent and executive Director Francesco Caio, Chief Executive Officer and General Manager of the Company until August 31, 2022, was submitted by the shareholder CDP Industria SpA (now CDP Equity SpA).

Pursuant to Article 19 of the Articles of Association, the Directors must meet the independence and integrity requirements prescribed by regulations, and possess the professional expertise, competence and experience to carry out their mandate efficiently and effectively and they are able to dedicate sufficient time and resources to their office.

On February 23, 2022, at the proposal of the Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance Committee, the Board of Directors resolved to adopt qualitative and quantitative criteria for the purposes of ascertaining the independence requirement of Directors, as illustrated in detail in the paragraph "Independent Directors" on page 32 of this Report. Information on other Directorships or Auditors posts held by the directors in listed companies, in financial, insurance or large companies are listed below under "Number of offices held".

The Shareholders' Meeting did not authorise any exceptions to the non-competition clause provided for in Article 2390 of the Italian Civil Code.

Composition (pursuant to Article 123-bis, paragraph 2, letter d) and d-bis), of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998)

The Board of Directors in office on March 12, 2021 approved the Directors' Reports and the proposed resolutions to submit to the Shareholders' Meeting and, in compliance with Article 4, Recommendation 23, of the Corporate Governance Code, it asked the shareholders presenting a list containing more than half of the candidates to be elected to provide adequate information, together with the documentation required to file the list, concerning the compliance of the list with the recommendations made by the outgoing Board of Directors, also vis-à-vis the diversity required by Principle VII and Recommendation 8 of the same Corporate Governance Code, and to indicate their candidate for the office of Chairman of the Board, whose appointment takes place according to the procedures identified in the Articles of Association.

The Shareholders' Meeting on April 30, 2021 set the number of Directors at nine, appointing the Board of Directors for the years 2021-2022-2023, its mandate expiring at the Shareholders' Meeting called to approve the Financial Statements at December 31, 2023. The Board was made up as follows: Silvia Merlo (independent, non-executive Director), Francesco Caio (non-independent, executive Director, already Chairman in the previous board mandate), Roberto Diacetti (independent, non-executive Director), Alessandra Ferone (non-independent, non-executive Director, already Director in the previous board mandate from February 2020), Patrizia Michela Giangualano (independent, non-executive Director), Pier Francesco Ragni (non-independent, non-executive Director), Marco Reggiani (non-independent, non-executive Director), Paul Schapira (independent, non-executive Director, already Director in the previous board mandate) and Paola Tagliavini (independent, non-executive Director).

Silvia Merlo, Francesco Caio, Alessandra Ferone, Pier Francesco Ragni, Marco Reggiani and Paola Tagliavini were drawn from the list submitted jointly by Eni SpA and CDP Industria SpA (now CDP Equity SpA), whose holding is equal to 43.095% of Saipem ordinary share capital, voted by the majority of the shareholders at the Shareholders' Meeting.

As for the Directors appointed by co-optation in 2022, the CEO and General Manager Alessandro Puliti is an Executive non-independent Director, while Davide Manunta is a non-executive and non-independent Director.

Roberto Diacetti, Patrizia Michela Giangualano and Paul Schapira were drawn from the list submitted by shareholders5 whose holding is equal to 1.161% of Saipem ordinary share capital, voted by the minority of shareholders at the Shareholders' Meeting.

When putting forward their candidacy, Silvia Merlo, Paola Tagliavini, Paul Schapira, Roberto Diacetti and Patrizia Michela Giangualano declared that they possessed the independence requirements provided for by Article 148, paragraph 3, of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998, as referred to in Article 147-ter, paragraph 4 of the same Legislative Decree and the recommendations of the Corporate Governance Code, which Saipem endorses.

As previously stated, on February 23, 2022, at the proposal of the Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance Committee, the Board of Directors resolved to adopt qualitative and quantitative criteria for the purposes of ascertaining the independence requirements of Directors, as illustrated in detail in the paragraph "Independent Directors" on page 32 of this Report.

The Shareholders' Meeting appointed Silvia Merlo as Chairman of the Board of Directors, at the joint proposal of the shareholders Eni SpA and CDP Equity SpA.

The résumés with the professional profile of each Director are available on the website www.saipem.com under the "Governance" section.

(5) Amundi Asset Management SGR SpA manager of the fund Amundi Risparmio Italia; ANIMA SGR SpA manager of the fund Anima Iniziativa Italia; Eurizon Capital S.A. manager of the fund Eurizon Fund comparto Italian Equity Opportunities; Eurizon Capital SGR S.p.A manager of the funds: Eurizon Progetto Italia 70, Eurizon Azioni Italia, Eurizon Progetto Italia 40, Eurizon Italian Fund - ELTIF, Eurizon PIR Italia Azioni; Fideuram Asset Management Ireland manager of the fund Fonditalia Equity Italy; Fideuram Intesa Sanpaolo Private Banking Asset Management SGR SpA manager of the funds: Fideuram Italia, Piano Azioni Italia, Piano Bilanciato Italia 50; Interfund Sicav - Interfund Equity Italy; Generali Investments Partners SpA SGR manager of the fund GIP Alleanza Obbl; Kairos Partners SGR SpA in its capacity as Management Company di Kairos International Sicav - comparto Italia; Mediobanca SGR SpA manager of the fund: Fondo Mediobanca Mid & Small Cap Italy; Mediobanca SICAV - Euro Equities; Mediolanum International Funds Limited - Challenge Funds - Challenge Italian Equity; Mediolanum Gestione Fondi SGR SpA manager of the funds: Mediolanum Flessibile Futuro Italia, Mediolanum Flessibile Sviluppo Italia; Pramerica Sicav comparto Italian Equity; Pramerica SGR SpA manager of the funds: MITO 25, MITO 50.

On February 25, 2020, Saipem's Board of Directors adopted, after a review by the Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance Committee, the statutory changes necessary to ensure compliance with the most recent legislation on gender balance (Law No. 160 dated December 27, 2019).

With the appointment of the Board of Directors by the Shareholders' Meeting on April 30, 2021, Article 147-ter, paragraph 1-ter, of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998, as amended by paragraph 302 of Law No. 160 dated December 27, 2019, was applied, ensuring, for six consecutive mandates, that at least two fifths of the members of the Board of Directors are of the least represented gender. After the appointment and on an annual basis thereafter, the Directors make declarations stating they possess the independence and integrity requirements as set by the relevant regulations and the Board makes sure they are met.

At their meeting of April 30, 2021, the Board of Directors, based on the declarations provided by the Directors and on information at the Company's disposal, ascertained that all Board Directors meet the integrity requirements, and that no reasons for ineligibility or exist, as required by current legislation. The Board of Directors also verified the independence requirements provided for by the law and the Corporate Governance Code, ascertaining that the Directors Roberto Diacetti, Patrizia Michela Giangualano, Paul Schapira and Paola Tagliavini are independent. In light of the powers and role assigned to the Chairman, Silvia Merlo is also confirmed as an independent Director.

The Board of Directors is therefore made up by a majority of independent Directors, all of whom are non-executive Directors, except for the Chief Executive Officer and General Manager.

At their meeting of March 15, 2022, the Board of Directors, based on the declarations provided by the Directors and the information at the Company's disposal, ascertained that the Chairman Silvia Merlo and the Directors Roberto Diacetti, Patrizia Michela Giangualano, Paul Schapira and Paola Tagliavini continued to be independent Directors.

When appointing the Directors by co-optation, the Board of Directors, at their meetings of August 31, 2022 and October 26, 2022, ascertained that the newly appointed Directors met the relevant requirements, and disclosed this information in the subsequent press release.

On March 7, 2023, the Board of Directors verified that the Chairman Silvia Merlo and the Directors Roberto Diacetti, Patrizia Michela Giangualano, Paul Schapira and Paola Tagliavini met the independence requirements.

Criteria and policies on diversity

The appointment of Saipem's management and control bodies occurs, pursuant to Articles 19 and 27 of the Articles of Association, through voting from lists (please refer to page 24, paragraph "Appointment and replacement" and page 52, paragraph "Composition, appointment and functioning of Board of Statutory Auditors"). It is therefore the shareholders' responsibility to evaluate and define the policies concerning the age, nationality, experience and professional development of the candidates, as well as their objectives, methods of implementation and results.

Concerning gender quotas Saipem has immediately aligned its Articles of Association to the relevant legislative provisions as they were introduced. Law No. 160 dated December 27, 2019, aimed at extending the effects of Law No. 120/2011, introduced a minimum quota for the "least represented" gender in administrative and control bodies, equal to two fifths of appointed Board of Directors and Statutory Auditors, which applies for six consecutive terms from its entry into force.

Saipem has therefore aligned its Articles of Association to the aforementioned legislative provisions.

In compliance with Article 4, Principle XIII, Recommendation 23 of the Corporate Governance Code – which recommends that the outgoing Boards of Directors of listed companies make their Recommendations to the shareholders on the quantitative and qualitative composition they deem the new Board should have – upon the renewal of Saipem Board of Directors at the Shareholders' Meeting 2021, the then Board of Directors had recommended that the shareholders, in submitting the list of candidates to the office of Board Directors, ensure that the number of candidates of the least represented gender be at least two-fifths of the size they had chosen for the Administrative Body (and therefore at least four in the case of a Board of Directors composed of nine members). Furthermore, the Board of Directors had required anyone presenting a list containing more than half of the candidates to be elected to provide adequate information, in the documentation submitted for filing the list, about the compliance of the list with the 'Recommendations made by the Board of Directors, also with reference to the diversity criteria provided for by Article 2, Principle VII and Recommendation 8 of the same Corporate Governance Code, and to indicate their candidate to the office of Chairman of the Board, whose appointment takes place according to the procedures set forth in the Articles of Association.

The current composition of Saipem's corporate bodies complies with current legislation on gender balance. In line with Saipem's commitments to uphold the values of diversity, equity and inclusion, on November 15, 2022 the Board of Directors approved the Diversity, Equality & Inclusion Policy, a Group-wide document aimed at:

  • ≥ promoting and supporting a culture based on valuing diversity, removing all forms of discrimination and cultural, organisational and material barriers;
  • ≥ valuing differences as a source of mutual enrichment and an essential element for business sustainability and competitiveness;
  • ≥ spreading the principles of inclusion and fairness, fostering a collaborative work environment, developing programmes and business processes aimed at promoting equal opportunities.

On November 11, 2022, underlining its solid commitment to Diversity, Equity & Inclusion, DNV awarded Saipem the certification of International Standard ISO 30415:2021 on "Human Resources Management Diversity and Inclusion". This standard represents the reference guideline for adopting a continuous improvement plan, through the definition of more sustainable KPIs and strategic objectives to foster the promotion of diversity and inclusion.

Maximum number of offices held at other companies

Pursuant to application criteria 1.c.2 and 1.c.3 of the old Corporate Governance Code (now Article 3, Principle XII, Recommendation 15 of the current Corporate Governance Code) to ensure that Directors can devote enough time to their office, taking into account their own professional commitments and their participation in Board Committees, the Board of Directors on February 26, 2018, at the proposal of the then Corporate Governance Committee and Scenarios, expressed the following guidelines on the maximum number of offices a Director may hold in other companies.

"With regard to Saipem's Directors, pursuant to the maximum number of administrative and control positions as defined by Article 144-duodecies of the Issuers' Regulations – the same rules apply as established by the Issuers' Regulations for members of the control bodies (Articles 144-duodecies and 144-terdecies), with the indication that:

  • 1) an executive Director should not hold the office of: (i) executive Director in any other listed company, whether Italian or foreign, or in any financial, banking or insurance company or in a company with shareholders' equity exceeding €1 billion; (ii) non-executive Director of another issuer, whether Italian or foreign, in the event that the executive Director of the same issuer is a Director of Saipem;
  • 2) Saipem's Chairman should not hold the office of Board Director in more than four listed companies, whether Italian or foreign;
  • 3) an executive Director should not hold the office of executive Director of another issuer, whether Italian or foreign, in the event that a non-executive Director of the same issuer is an executive Director of Saipem;
  • 4) in accordance with the provisions introduced in 2015 by the Corporate Governance Code for listed companies, which requires that the Board of Directors take into consideration, in expressing the Board's recommendations on the maximum number of Directors' offices, the participation of Directors in Board Committees, the calculation model to be applied contained in Annex 5-bis, Table 1 of Article 144-terdecies of the Issuers' Regulation, attributes a weight of 0.10 for the office of Chairman of a Board Committee (other than the Executive Committee) and 0.05 for the office of member in a Board Committee (other than the Executive Committee);
  • 5) a candidate for the position of non-executive Director of Saipem is allocated a fixed weight of 0.85 to take into account their future participation in Board Committees. The weight attributed to the office of commissioner/administrator of a large company under special administration is the same as the weight attributed to the office of executive Director;
  • 6) the limit on multiple offices excludes offices held in Saipem Group companies.

Should the aforementioned limits be exceeded, Directors shall immediately inform the Board of Directors, who, after assessing the position and, in light of the Company's interests, shall invite the Director to make the relevant decisions". This guideline was confirmed by the outgoing Board of Directors which, with the resolution dated February 24, 2021, after consulting the Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance Committee, in formulating the recommendations addressed to the Shareholders presenting the lists of candidates, regarding professional skills, competencies and experience deemed suitable for an optimal composition of Saipem's Board of Directors, had expressed and underlined the importance of "identifying the profiles capable of ensuring that adequate time could be devoted to the diligent fulfillment of the tasks assigned, also having regard to the guideline on the maximum number of offices held in management and control bodies adopted by Saipem's Board of Directors on February 26, 2018".

Based on the information received, listed hereunder are additional Directorships or auditor posts held by Saipem's Board Directors in other companies on the date of this Report.

SILVIA MERLO (nominated jointly by the shareholders Eni SpA and CDP Industria SpA)

CEO of: Merlo SpA, Tecnoindustrie Merlo SpA; Board Director of: Treemme Tecnology Srl, Ibis SpA, Sanlorenzo SpA6, Ergos Srl, Movimatica Srl, Centro Formazione e Ricerca Merlo Srl, CO.IMM.I. Srl.

ALESSANDRO PULITI (co-opted by the Board of Directors on August 31, 2022) N/A.

ROBERTO DIACETTI (nominated from the list put forward by institutional investors) Board Director of: Pirelli & C. SpA6, Banca Ifis SpA6.

ALESSANDRA FERONE (nominated jointly by the shareholders Eni SpA and CDP Industria SpA (now CDP Equity SpA) Member of the Supervisory Board of Euronext NV6.

PATRIZIA MICHELA GIANGUALANO (nominated from the list put forward by institutional investors) Board Director of: Salvatore Ferragamo SpA6, Leonardo SpA6.

DAVIDE MANUNTA (nominated jointly by the shareholder CDP Industria SpA – now CDP Equity SpA – and co-opted by the Board of Directors on October 26, 2022)

Board Director of: Trevi Finanziaria Industriale SpA6, Trevi SpA, Soilmee SpA; Chairman of the Board of Directors of Renovit SpA.

(6) Listed company.

MARCO REGGIANI (nominated jointly by the shareholders Eni SpA and CDP Industria SpA, now CDP Equity SpA) Chairman of the Board of Directors of Stogit SpA; Chairman of MJ Advisory Srl; Board Director of Edizioni Settecolori Srl.

PAUL SCHAPIRA (nominated from the list put forward by institutional investors) Board Director of: Tamburi Investment Partners SpA7, Epipoli SpA.

PAOLA TAGLIAVINI (nominated jointly by the shareholders Eni SpA and CDP Industria SpA, now CDP Equity SpA) Board Director of: Intesa Sanpaolo SpA7, Rai Way SpA7, Interpump Group SpA7.

Functioning of the Board of Directors (pursuant to Article 123-bis, paragraph 2, letter d), of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998)

In 2021, the Board of Directors approved, pursuant to Article 3, Recommendation No. 11 of the Corporate Governance Code, the Rules and Regulations that govern the functions and organisation of the Board of Directors, setting forth the provisions for summoning and running Board meetings. The Rules and Regulations were further updated by the Board of Directors at their meeting of February 23, 2022. Specifically, in accordance with the aforementioned Rules and Regulations, the Chairman summons the Board of Directors' meetings, sets the agenda and notifies the Directors and the Board of Statutory Auditors generally five days prior to the Board meeting, except in cases of urgent summons, and in any case no later than 24 hours prior to the meeting.

In 2022, the Board of Directors was duly convened by means of a notice sent within the five-day period prescribed by the Articles of Association.

The Chairman organises the work of the Board and ensures that the Directors and Statutory Auditors are provided with the necessary documentation and information, promptly and reasonably in advance, to enable them to make decisions. The pre-meeting documentation is usually sent no later than the publication of the notice of meeting (at least five days prior to the date of the meeting). To this end, since 2013 a new IT platform named "BoardVantage" has been used to enable the sharing and exchange of documents, notes and messages between the Company departments and the Board of Directors, or amongst members of the Board. The system ensures the highest confidentiality through appropriate access credentials.

The meeting documentation is – in case of urgency – with a notice of no less than 24 hours; in the absence of such notice, the Board of Directors can discuss the items of the agenda, examine the related documents and take resolutions only through a unanimous decision by the Board.

In 2022, the deadline for the transmission of the Board of Directors' documentation as set forth in the Board of Directors' Rules and Regulations was largely met (with a further improvement in the second half of the year), with the exception of a few urgent cases relating to extraordinary resolutions, in which the Board was nevertheless guaranteed adequate examination of the items on the agenda.

As recommended by the Corporate Governance Code, the Chairman of the Board of Directors, with the assistance of the Secretary of the Board, ensures that pre-meeting and complementary information provided during the meetings are such as to enable the Directors to act in an informed manner in carrying out their roles.

Furthermore, with a view to continuous improvement, from October 2022 Board meetings have been held with the aid of electronic devices that allow all Board members and Statutory Auditors to access the Board documentation in electronic format.

Board meetings are usually held at the offices of the Company. In the event of audio or video conferencing with third party offices, it is the responsibility of the participants attending remotely to ensure the confidentiality of the communication.

To improve the Board's knowledge of the Company's operations and dynamics, the Directors of the various business areas, as well as the heads of the Staff functions are periodically invited to Board meetings to illustrate the most significant projects, strategies and market conditions in their respective areas. The Senior Manager responsible for Financial Reporting, who is also Chief Financial Officer, frequently attends Board meetings and, in any case, he attends all meetings at which strategic issues or matters falling within his remit are discussed.

At Board of Directors' meetings, the Chairman reminds the Directors, pursuant to Article 2391 of the Italian Civil Code, that they are required to inform the other Directors and the Board of Statutory Auditors of any interest they may have, on their own behalf or on behalf of third parties, in relation to the items on the agenda before the discussion takes place; they have to specify the nature, terms, origin and extent of any interest they may have.

When resolving on items, the Directors concerned do not normally take part in the discussion and do not vote on relevant issues, leaving the meeting momentarily during the approval of those resolutions.

The Company's Articles of Association do not specify how often the Board should meet, although Article 21 states it should occur at least quarterly.

In 2022, also due to the exceptional circumstances and events the Company experienced during the year, the Board of Directors met on 28 occasions, their meetings lasting 4.21 hours on average.

Three meetings have been scheduled to take place in the first half of 2023; as of March 14, 2023, the Board has already held 3 meetings. The general public is informed of the dates of Board meetings when periodical statements and reports, required by current legislation, are to be approved.

In 2022, an average of 98.05% of Board Directors and 97.14% of independent Directors attended Board meetings. Lastly, it should be noted that in 2022, the following company functions participated in the Board of Directors' meetings, to advise on specific topics under their respective remit: the Chief Financial Officer, the General Counsel, the Head of People, Safety and Environment, the Head of Internal Audit, the Head of Strategy and M&A, the Head of the Commercial Department, the Head of the Business Integrity Department, the Head of the Finance Department, the Head of the Health, Safety, Environment & Quality Department, as well as the heads of the various business lines.

Board of Directors' induction

Following the appointment of the new Board of Directors by the Shareholders' Meeting on April 30, 2021, Saipem set up and rolled-out a board induction programme.

During 2021, it was not possible to carry out off-site inductions due to the regulations issued to contain the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Conversely, in 2022, the training programme, involving also the Board of Statutory Auditors comprised of, besides the usual head-office induction sessions, guided visits to vessels of the corporate fleet: a Board meeting was organised to take place on the Saipem 10000 drillship in Egypt (September 19-21, 2022), and the visit to the Saipem FDS 2 vessel in Genoa on December 12, 2022.

Furthermore, as anticipated, ad-hoc induction sessions were held on-site on topics related to the Company's E&C and Offshore Drilling business operations (November 14, 2022), prior to the Board meeting scheduled on the same date, and on December 13, 2022, again prior to the Board meeting, on the Company's activities in the Offshore wind sector.

In early 2023, an induction session was held on Carbon Capture and Storage (January 25, 2023).

Role of the Chairman of the Board of Directors

The Shareholders' Meeting on April 30, 2021 appointed Silvia Merlo as Chairman of the Board of Directors, at the joint proposal of the Shareholders Eni SpA and CDP Industria SpA, now CDP Equity SpA.

At their meeting of April 30, 2021, the Board of Directors vested the Chairman, in addition to all responsibilities and powers granted to her by law and the Company's Articles of Association concerning the management of Corporate Bodies (Shareholders' Meeting and Board of Directors) and the legal representation of the Company, with the existing powers granted to the Chairman during the previous Board mandate. Specifically the Chairman:

  • a) in agreement with the CEO and having consulted the Compensation and Nomination Committee, proposes to the Board the appointment and dismissal of General Managers. Should the Chief Executive Officer be appointed as General Manager, the proposal is made by the Chairman who, in name and on behalf of the Company, signs the relevant employment contract with the Chief Executive Officer-General Manager;
  • b) proposes in agreement with the CEO, having consulted the Compensation and Nomination Committee and received the opinion of Board of Statutory Auditors, the appointment and dismissal of the Director responsible for the Company's Financial Reporting;
  • c) in agreement with the Chief Executive Officer, having heard the opinion of the Audit and Risk Committee and the Board of Statutory Auditors, as well as the Compensation and Nomination Committee, makes proposals to the Board of Directors for the appointment of the members of the Compliance Committee pursuant to Legislative Decree No. 231/2001 and subsequent amendments;
  • d) in agreement with the Officer responsible for setting up and maintaining the Internal Control and Risk Management System, having received the opinion of the Audit and Risk Committee, and consulted the Board of Statutory Auditors, proposes to the Board of Directors the appointment, dismissal and remuneration of the Director responsible for the Internal Audit function; the latter is not responsible for any operational area and reports hierarchically to the Board of Directors, and on its behalf to its Chairman. However, functionally the Director responsible for Internal Audit reports to the Director responsible for setting up and maintaining the Internal Control and Risk Management System;
  • e) in agreement and conjunction with the CEO, makes proposals concerning extraordinary operations involving the Company's share capital and/or overall debt refinancing to be submitted for approval to the Board of Directors;
  • f) manages the Company's institutional relations in Italy in addition to shareholder relations, together with the CEO, having recourse to Saipem's communication and institutional relations functions, if required;
  • g) in agreement with the CEO, proposes the adoption of a policy for managing the engagement with shareholders, taking into account the engagement policies adopted by institutional investors and asset managers;
  • h) in agreement with the CEO, proposes the adoption of a procedure for the internal management and external disclosure of documents and information concerning the Company with particular reference to inside information;
  • i) proposes the appointment and revocation of the Secretary of the Board of Directors.

In addition to the aforementioned powers, the Chairman chairs the Shareholders' Meeting, convenes and chairs the Board of Directors' meetings and verifies the actual implementation of the resolutions taken by the Board itself.

The Secretary of the Board

Under the Corporate Governance Code, the Board of Directors, at the Chairman's proposal, appoints and revokes the Secretary of the Board. Pursuant to the Articles of Association, the Secretary can be appointed even if he or she is not a Director.

In approving its Rules and Regulations, on January 20, 2021 and further updating them on February 23, 2022, the Board specified the requirements and duties of the Secretary. In particular, pursuant to these Regulations, the Secretary must possess adequate experience and impartiality of judgment in carrying out the responsibilities envisaged for this role in the same Regulations and the relevant legislation applicable to companies listed on the Italian Stock Exchange.

The Secretary supports the activities of the Chairman and, specifically helps with organising Board and Shareholders' meetings, prepares the relevant resolutions, ensures the adequacy, timeliness, completeness and clarity of information flows to the Board, in the communication with Directors, coordinating, in accordance with the agreements between the Chairman and the CEO and General Manager, the attendance of Executives for the various Company functions to Board meetings based on their area of competence, organises the Board induction and ensures that the activities of Board Committees are in line with those of the Board.

On April 30, 2021, the Board of Directors had confirmed as Secretary of the Board of Directors Mario Colombo, who had held this position since 2013.

Following the organisational changes that took place within the Company in 2022, the Board of Directors at their meeting of October 26, 2022 appointed Simone Chini, General Counsel, Contract Management, Company Affairs, Governance and Public Affairs Director of Saipem, as Secretary of the Board of Directors.

Executive Directors

CEO

In line with international best practices, which recommend avoiding the concentration of duties in one person, in 2008 Saipem resolved to separate the roles of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (CEO), the latter being the Director who, by virtue of powers granted and their actual exercise, is the principal person responsible for the management of the Company.

The Corporate Governance Committee believes that the separation of the aforementioned roles can strengthen the characteristics of impartiality and balance required of a Chairman of the Board, to whom the law and procedures entrust the tasks of organising the work of the Board, as well as acting as a link between executive and nonexecutive Directors.

The separation of the roles of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer-CEO makes the appointment of a lead independent Director unnecessary, also since this appointment has not been requested by Saipem independent Directors.

Francesco Caio had been appointed, as executive Director, Chief Executive Officer and General Manager, by the Board of Directors on April 30, 2021; at the time he did not hold any position at any other issuer. During the Board meeting held on August 29-30-31, 2022, Francesco Caio resigned, effective immediately, from his positions as member of the Board of Directors and General Manager, thus relinquishing all his powers, having completed his contribution of redirection and relaunch of the Company, in a complex context.

The Board of Directors unanimously appointed Alessandro Puliti as Chief Executive Officer, retaining the position of General Manager conferred upon him by the Board of Directors on February 4, 2022, granting him all the powers previously granted to Francesco Caio. In particular, Alessandro Puliti, as Chief Executive Officer, has been granted all the powers necessary for the management and administration of the Company, with the sole exception of the powers reserved exclusively to the Board of Directors and the powers reserved, by law or by the Articles of Association, to the Board of Directors, to the Chairman or the Shareholders' Meeting; by way of example and not by way of limitation, the Chief Executive Officer has been granted the powers:

    1. to represent the Company, in Italy and abroad, in dealing with national or local Governing Bodies, private or public corporations, and private or legal persons, also before the judicial, administrative and tax authorities and to carry out, in the name and on behalf of the Company, all acts in any case pertaining to the corporate purpose;
    1. to enter into, modify, terminate and transfer:
  • a) enlistment contracts with Captains and Master Deck Offices, as well as the rest of the crew; to embark and disembark the same and establish shifts;
  • b) bank contracts and contracts with financial institutions; contracts of credit lines, current accounts, deposits, advances guaranteed by securities and safety deposit boxes;
    1. to perform operations on current accounts of the Company within the limits of the credit lines granted;
    1. to represent the Company before any ordinary, special or administrative judicial authority, or arbitration board, in Italy and abroad, of any order or degree, be it plaintiff or defendant, having the power to start, transact and settle single disputes, to defer or report the oath, to defer or refer the decisory oath, to take the decisory, supletory or estimatory oath; to waive and/or accept the waiver both of the action and of the right of action, and accept examinations, either free or formal on the facts of the proceedings, with the power to be substituted in single judgments by special attorneys in order for them to exercise any power conferred upon him; submit criminal complaints and appear as a civil party in the same trials; submit complaints to the competent authorities in Italy and abroad.
    1. to appoint and revoke lawyers for representation and defense in any judgment, including executive ones, in any state and degree, even before higher jurisdictions or in the process of being revoked, before ordinary, special, administrative and tax judicial authorities; nominate and revoke lawyers for the civil action in criminal trials; compromising in arbitrators, both ritual and non-ritual, or called to intervene as friendly composers and nominate and revoke the arbitrators themselves; appoint and dismiss arbitrators and experts; to appoint and dismiss attorneys in disputes compromised in arbitration;
    1. to appoint and revoke attorneys for the exercise of all or part of the powers conferred;
    1. to implement the resolutions passed by the Board of Directors at any time, the execution of which has been delegated to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company at the time in office.

The CEO reports promptly and at least quarterly to the Board of Directors and to the Board of Statutory Auditors on activities carried out and on the most significant economic, financial and equity transactions carried out by the Company or its subsidiaries.

There are no other executive Directors on the Board.

On the day of approval of this Report, the following Departments report to the Chief Executive Officer and General Manager:

  • ≥ Chief Financial Officer;
  • ≥ Chief Commercial Officer;
  • ≥ General Counsel, Contract Management, Company Affairs, Governance and Public Affairs Director;
  • ≥ Chief People, HSEQ and Sustainability Officer;
  • ≥ Business Integrity Director;
  • ≥ External Communication and Brand Management Director;
  • ≥ Supply Chain Digital and IT Director;
  • ≥ Chief Integrated Risk Management Officer;
  • ≥ Chief Technology and Innovation Officer;
  • ≥ Asset Based Services Chief Operating Officer;
  • ≥ Energy Carriers Chief Operating Officer;
  • ≥ Robotics and Industrialized Solutions Chief Operating Officer;
  • ≥ Sustainable Infrastructures Chief Operating Officer;
  • ≥ Offshore Wind Chief Operating Officer.

The Director for Internal Audit – Maurizio Bonzi – reports hierarchically to the Board of Directors and, on its behalf, to the Chairman of the Board, except for those duties that fall under the remit of the Audit and Risk Committee and the CEO, in his capacity as Officer responsible for the Internal Control and Risk Management System.

The Secretary of the Board of Directors – Simone Chini – reports hierarchically and functionally to the Board of Directors and, on its behalf, to the Chairman of the Board.

Antonio Paccioretti, through the resolution taken by the Board of Directors on June 9, 2021, had been the appointed Director responsible for the Company's Financial Reporting, having been granted all powers provided for by Legislative Decree No. 58/1998, reporting directly to the corporate bodies under the terms of the law. He covered this role until May 27, 2022.

Paolo Calcagnini, who held the position of Chief Project Control and Financial Advisory Officer since February 4, 2022, has held the position of Chief Financial Officer since May 27, 2022, in addition to that of Director responsible for the Company's Financial Reporting, having been granted all powers provided for by Legislative Decree No. 58/1998, reporting directly to the corporate bodies under the terms of the law.

Chairman of the Board of Directors

The Shareholders' Meeting on April 30, 2021 appointed Silvia Merlo as Chairman of the Board of Directors. The Chairman, who does not have an executive role, carries out the responsibilities granted under the law, the Articles of Association or the resolution by the Board of Directors dated April 30, 2021, indicated on page 30, under the paragraph "Role of the Chairman of the Board of Directors". The Chairman acts as a representative of the Company, in agreement and in coordination with the Chief Executive Officer and General Manager. The Chairman is not the main person responsible for the management of the Company (it is the Chief Executive Officer) and does not represent the controlling shareholder.

Independent Directors and Lead Independent Director

Independent Directors

Article 147-ter, paragraph 3, of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998 regulating the appointment and composition of the Board of Directors provides that at least one member shall be elected from the minority slate that obtained the largest number of votes and is not linked in any way, even indirectly, with the shareholders who presented or voted the list which resulted first by the number of votes. Furthermore, Article 147-ter, paragraph 4, states that in addition to what is provided for in paragraph 3, at least one of the members of the Board of Directors, or two if the Board of Directors is composed of more than seven members, should satisfy the independence requirements established for members of the Board of Auditors in Article 148 and, if provided for in the Articles of Association, the additional requirements established in codes of conduct drawn up by regulated stock exchange companies or by trade associations.

The Shareholders' Meeting on April 30, 2021 elected this Board of Directors for three years, in compliance with current legislation and the Articles of Association; the Board is comprised of a majority (five out of nine) of independent Directors, including the Chairman Silvia Merlo.

The Directors who do not comply with the independence requirement are the CEO Alessandro Puliti and the Directors Alessandra Ferone, Davide Manunta and Marco Reggiani. At the Board Meeting of March 15, 2022, it was ascertained (as they had stated upon their candidacy) that the following Board Directors still complied with the independence requirements: the Chairman Silvia Merlo and the Directors Roberto Diacetti, Patrizia Giangualano, Paul Schapira and Paola Tagliavini, who provided all the necessary documents to make this assessment. Lastly, on March 7, 2023, the Board of Directors verified that the aforementioned Directors still met the independence requirements.

Directors are committed to inform the Board of any changes that may ensue during their mandate. This evaluation is carried out in accordance with the criteria set forth in Article 148, paragraph 3, of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998 and Article 2, Recommendation 6, of the Corporate Governance Code. In making the aforementioned assessment, the Board of Directors considered all available information, reviewing, in particular, the information provided by the Directors under assessment, pursuant to Article 2, Recommendation 6 of the Corporate Governance Code.

The Board of Directors met on February 23, 2022 and, at the proposal of the Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance Committee, pursuant to Article 2, Recommendation 7 of the Corporate Governance Code and in relation to the circumstances that may compromise, or appear to compromise, the independence of a Director, resolved:

  • ≥ to set the "additional remuneration", which may be construed as jeopardising the independence of a Director of the Company at an amount not exceeding 30% of the "fixed" remuneration paid annually to a Director;
  • ≥ to set the advantages that may derive from a significant commercial, financial or professional relationship of a Director of the Company at an amount not exceeding 30% of the "fixed" remuneration paid annually to a Director;
  • ≥ to define as "close family members", for the purposes of all the circumstances that may be construed as jeopardising the independence of a Director, spouse, relatives or in-laws within the second degree.

The Board of Statutory Auditors verified the correct application of the Board's criteria and procedures adopted for assessing the independence of its members at the Board Meeting of March 15, 2022.

In 2022, the independent Directors met without the other Directors being present on January 31, February 10, February 23 and April 1, 2022. The meeting of the independent Directors was coordinated by the most senior Director, Paul Schapira.

The independent Directors also met on March 14, 2023.

Lead Independent Director

Saipem has not appointed a Lead Independent Director as the conditions set out in Recommendation 13 of the Corporate Governance Code do not exist. In fact, the Chairman of the Board of Directors does not hold the role of principal responsible for the management of the Company (CEO), nor does he have a controlling interest in the Company. Furthermore, the establishment of the Lead Independent Director was not requested by the independent Directors.

Processing of inside information

In 2013, the Board of Directors had approved the Management System Guideline (MSG) "Market Abuse" ("MSG Market Abuse").

In 2016, when the most recent EU Regulation on market abuse (EU Regulation 596/2014/MAR, "MAR Regulations") came into force, Saipem had immediately taken measures to make the Register of parties having access to inside information compliant to the new guidelines. In 2018, Saipem carried out a general review of the MSG Market Abuse, in compliance with the update of the reference regulatory framework.

The MSG Market Abuse established the principles and rules that Saipem and the companies that it controls, directly and indirectly, in Italy and abroad must adhere to manage internal communication and external disclosure of documents and information regarding Saipem, with particular reference to Inside Information.

To this end, the MSG Market Abuse regulates the establishment, keeping and updating of Lists of persons with access to the aforementioned information, or to Significant Information as defined below; the identification of significant persons and the means of notifying transactions executed, including through third parties, on shares issued by Saipem or on other financial instruments linked to these shares ("Internal Dealing"). To fulfil the obligation for timely publication of Inside Information, Saipem identifies and monitors flows of Significant Information (so called Mapping). For the purposes of the Significant Information Mapping, the types of Significant Information are identified, in accordance with a matrix that links the corresponding organisational functions to the Significant Information.

The rules of conduct in this MSG have been adopted to: (a) ensure compliance with the legal, regulatory and governance provisions on the subject; (b) protect shareholders and investors, in order to prevent transactions that would be harmful to their interests through the exploitation of asymmetric information or through the dissemination of false or misleading information; (c) protect the Company against any liability it might have for offences committed by parties related to it.

The MSG Market Abuse identifies as "significant persons", for the purposes of Internal Dealing and in compliance with the Market Abuse procedure, the following: (a) members of the Company's Board of Directors and the Board of Statutory Auditors; (b) managers with strategic responsibilities as identified by the Board of Directors; (c) anyone who, directly or indirectly, has a holding, calculated pursuant to Article 118 of the Issuer Regulation, of at least ten per cent (10%) of the Company's share capital, represented by shares with voting rights, and any other entity that controls the Company ("Significant shareholders").

On March 15, 2022, the Board of Directors, with the abstention of the CEO and at the proposal of the Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance Committee, resolved to identify Saipem's Senior Managers with Strategic Responsibilities (SRS) as the persons who perform management functions and executives who have regular access to inside information and are vested with powers to make management decisions that may affect the evolution and future prospects of the Saipem Group, as identified from time to time by the Board of Directors and therefore, until otherwise resolved by the Board of Directors: the General Manager, the Director responsible for the Company's Financial Reporting, the Chief Financial Officer, the Director of the Personnel, Safety and Environment function, the Chief Project Control and Financial Advisory Officer, the Director for Company Affairs and Corporate Governance, the Director for Legal Affairs and Contract Management, the Director for the Commercial function, the Director of Supply Chain, the Director for Asset Based Services, the Director for Energy Carriers, the Director for Robotics and Industrialized Solutions and the Director for Sustainable Infrastructures.

Pursuant to the provisions of MAR Regulations, applicable from July 3, 2016, the MSG Market Abuse identifies as significant persons also the persons closely associated with them: (a) a spouse, not legally separated, or a partner considered equivalent to a spouse under national law; (b) a dependent child, including the spouse's, under national law; (c) parents, relatives and the like who have shared the same house for at least one year on the date of the transaction in question; or (d) a legal person, trust or partnership, the managerial responsibilities of which are discharged by a Significant Person or a person referred to in letters (a), (b) or (c), which is directly or indirectly controlled by a Significant Person, which is set up for the benefit of such a person, or the economic interests of which are substantially equivalent to those of the significant person.

As and when provided by law, sale or purchase transactions involving Saipem shares are disclosed to Consob, Borsa Italiana and the public through the relevant section of the IT platform "eMarket SDIR" and subsequently sent to the authorised storage mechanism "eMarket Storage" () and published on the Company's website.

The MSG Market Abuse, published in 2018 and updated in 2020, has also adopted the new provisions related to the so called "black-out period", i.e. the specific periods during which significant persons and persons closely associated with them may not execute transactions (thirty calendar days before the public disclosure of approval of financial statements or other periodic financial reports), whose calendar is constantly updated and notified to significant persons.

The MSG Market Abuse is published on Saipem's website at www.saipem.com under the section "Governance".

Board of Directors' Committees (pursuant to Article 123-bis, paragraph 2, letter d), of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998)

Considering the recommendations and principles contained in the Corporate Governance Code, with a resolution dated May 18, 2021, the Board of Directors set up the following Board committees with consulting and advisory functions: the Compensation and Nomination Committee, the Audit and Risk Committee, the Related Parties Committee and the Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance Committee.

In defining the composition of the Committees, the Board considered both the skills and experience of the individual members – selecting the most appropriate professional profiles for the relevant tasks and also taking into consideration any experience gained at Saipem – and the number of other offices they held. Of the nine Directors appointed by the Shareholders' Meeting of April 30, 2021, three Directors (Patrizia Michela Giangualano, Roberto Diacetti and Paola Tagliavini) are members of the Related Parties Committee, four Directors (the Chairman Silvia Merlo, Patrizia Michela Giangualano, Pier Francesco Ragni up to October 26, 2022, and since Davide Manunta, and Marco Reggiani) are members of the Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance Committee, three Directors (Paola Tagliavini, Paul Schapira and Roberto Diacetti) are members of the Audit and Risk Committee, three Directors (Paul Schapira, Alessandra Ferone and Paola Tagliavini) are members of the Compensation and Nomination Committee. The 2022 Board Review found that the number and composition of Committees and the quality of their advisory and investigative contribution to be very positive, as was the role of their respective Chairmen; the same positive judgement applies to the Committees' regulations which are deemed to be in line with the regulatory and best practice provisions on Corporate Governance, without prejudice to the opportunity for continuous improvement. Equally adequate were deemed to be the time and attention that the Board of Directors devotes in receiving the reports by the Committees themselves.

Each Committee has its own rules and regulations, most recently approved by the Board of Directors on June 30, 2021, which govern, in particular, the composition, duties and functioning of the Committee itself.

In particular, the Committees are appointed by the Board of Directors (which also appoints the Chairman) and remain in office for the entire mandate of the Board itself.

The Committees usually meet, with a frequency appropriate to the proper performance of their functions, on the dates set out in the annual calendar of meetings approved by the Committees themselves, at the Company's registered office or in the place indicated in the notice of meeting.

The Committee Rules and Regulations govern the role, identification and functions of the Secretary of each Committee.

The meetings of the Committees are convened by means of a notice sent to the attendees by their Chairman or by the Secretary of the Committee on behalf of the Chairman.

The documentation is sent to all the members of the relevant Committee sufficiently in advance to enable them to be properly informed on the date of the meeting.

For Committee meetings to be quorate, the majority of its current members is required to be present, and resolutions are passed by an absolute majority of the members present.

Committee meetings, which can also be held via videoconference, are recorded and transcribed in ad-hoc books. The minutes of meetings can be consulted by the Directors and Statutory Auditors in such a way as to ensure their confidentiality (BoardVantage or other equivalent instrument).

The Chairman of the Board of Statutory Auditors, or a Statutory Auditor designated by the latter, participates in the meetings of each Committee; however, the other statutory auditors may also participate.

Additional information is provided on the number of meetings held by each Committee during the year (up to the date of approval of this Report), as well as the participation of each member in Committee meetings, please refer to Table 3 on page 64 of this Report.

The Committees envisaged by the Corporate Governance Code (Audit and Risk Committee and Compensation and Nomination Committee) are composed of at least three Directors and, in particular, the Audit and Risk Committee is currently composed exclusively of non-executive and independent Directors; conversely, the Compensation and Nomination Committee is made up of non-executive Directors, the majority of whom are independent. The Chairmen of both Committees are both qualified as independent. The current composition of the Committees therefore reflects the recommendations of the Corporate Governance Code on the subject.

For a more detailed description of the Board Committees, please refer to the following sections of this Report.

Additional Committees (other than those provided for by the legislation or recommended by the Code)

The Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance Committee was set up through a resolution of the then Board of Directors on May 16, 2018.

The Committee's Rules and Regulations were approved by the Board of Directors (on February 24, 2021 and most recently on June 30, 2021) and are published on the Company's website.

At their meeting of May 18, 2021, the Board of Directors appointed the following non-executive Directors as members of the Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance Committee: the Chairman of Saipem's Board of Directors, Silvia Merlo, who chairs the Committee, Patrizia Michela Giangualano, Pier Francesco Ragni and Marco Reggiani. On October 26, 2022, the Board of Directors appointed Davide Manunta as member of the Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance Committee, replacing Pier Francesco Ragni, who had resigned.

The Committee's Rules and Regulations provide that the members of the Board of Statutory Auditors attend Committee meetings.

At the proposal of its Chairman, the Committee appoints a Secretary, who is not a member and is entrusted with the task of drawing up the minutes of meetings and assisting the Committee in carrying out its duties.

The Committee is responsible for assisting the Board of Directors by fulfilling a preparatory, consultative and advisory role in assessments and decision-making processes with regard to Sustainability issues, also understood as environmental, social and governance issues, related to Saipem's business and its engagement with all stakeholders, Saipem's Corporate Social Responsibility and the review of scenarios envisaged in the preparation of the Strategic Plan, based also on the analysis of significant issues for the creation of long-term value and the Corporate Governance of the Company and the Group.

Specifically, the Committee has the following duties:

  • a. examine the indications of sustainability policies and strategies developed by Saipem's Sustainability Committee. Express an opinion to the Board of Directors in this regard;
  • b. share with the Board of Directors, and other Board committees, policies based on the principles of sustainable business, which take into account the evolution of the reference scenarios, identify opportunities and create value, also in the long-term, for stakeholders, such as: (i) ethics; (ii) environmental protection, with particular reference to the issue of climate change; (iii) socio-economic progress of the areas in which the Company operates; (iv) protection of human rights; (v) enhancement of differences and equality of treatment for all persons;
  • c. review the general approach of the annual sustainability report and the articulation of its contents, as well as the completeness and transparency of the communication provided to stakeholders through the same report, expressing an opinion to the Board of Directors called to approve this document;
  • d. ascertain the general layout of the non-financial statement and the articulation of its contents, as well as the completeness and transparency of the information provided in the same document, communicating the outcome of this assessment, through the Chairman of the Committee, to the Audit and Risk Committee, called to ensure that the periodic non-financial information correctly represents the business model, the strategies of the Company, the impact of its activities and its performance;
  • e. monitor the implementation of the sustainability vision, in its broader meaning of purpose, approved by the Board of Directors, and propose the actions necessary to determine the stakeholder value generated by the Company, as part of its stakeholder engagement activities, contributing to the definition and adoption of a measurement model;

  • f. monitor the Company's positioning with respect to the financial markets vis-à-vis sustainability issues, with particular reference to: i) sustainable finance (i.e. green bonds); ii) the relationship with ESG rating agencies; iii) participation and inclusion in sustainability indices;

  • g. monitor initiatives aimed at local communities and evaluate their social and environmental impact, issuing a prior opinion on the Community Initiatives Plan to the Board of Directors called to approve this document.
  • h. monitoring the development of national and international laws and best practices in relation to corporate governance and updating the Board of Directors in the event of any significant changes thereto;
  • i. checking the compliance of the Company's and the Group's corporate governance system with the law, with the recommendations contained in the Corporate Governance Code and with national and international best practices;
  • j. monitor the positioning of the Company's Code of Ethics vis-à-vis national and international regulations and best practices, making proposals to the Board of Directors;
  • k. formulating proposals to the Board of Directors for improvements to the corporate governance system of the Company and the Group's shareholding structure, where it deems these to be either necessary or appropriate;
  • l. examining in advance the annual report on corporate governance to be published at the same time as the financial statements;
  • m. making recommendations to the Board of Directors regarding the maximum number of board memberships a Company Director may hold on the administration and control bodies of other companies listed on regulated markets, finance, banking and insurance companies or, at any rate, companies of significant size, which can be considered compatible with the efficient performance of his/her duties as a Director of the Company, taking into account the commitment associated with this role;
  • n. carrying out an assessment to ascertain the independence of each Director immediately after their appointment and during the course of their mandate whenever events occur that are relevant for the purposes of independence and, in any case, at least annually;
  • o. making recommendations to the Board of Directors vis-à-vis any problematic circumstances arising in relation to application of the Director's non-competition obligation pursuant to Article 2390 of the Italian Civil Code, in cases where, for reasons of an organisational nature, the shareholders have authorised a general, advance waiver of said obligation;
  • p. reviewing scenarios and guidelines for the preparation of the Company's Strategic Plan, based also on the analysis of significant issues for the creation of long-term value and expressing an opinion to the Board of Directors.

In 2022, the Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance Committee met on 8 occasions, with meetings lasting an average 1.46 hours and attended by 100% of members.

The Board of Statutory Auditors attended all meetings.

The Chairman of the Committee provides information to the Board of Directors on Committee activities and topics discussed after the latest Board of Directors meeting, at the earliest Board meeting possible.

  • In 2022, the Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance Committee dealt with the following main issues:
  • ≥ assessment of the alignment of Saipem's Corporate Governance system with the recommendations of the Corporate Governance Code also in consideration of the 2021 Report on the evolution of the Corporate Governance of listed companies (9th Report on the application of the Corporate Governance Code);
  • ≥ review of the draft document "Corporate Governance and Shareholding Structure Report 2021";
  • ≥ review of the draft document "Sustainability Report 2021";
  • ≥ review of the draft "Consolidated Non-Financial Statement");
  • ≥ Saipem Modern Slavery Statement 2020;
  • ≥ review of the draft of the "Fifth Climate Change Document" in line with the requirements of the Task Force on Climate Related Financial Disclosure;
  • ≥ presentation of results for the Materiality Analysis 2022;
  • ≥ information on ESG / sustainability ratings and indexes and analysis of Saipem positioning;
  • ≥ setting the 2023 budget of the Committee proposal to the Board of Directors;
  • ≥ preliminary draft of the Consolidated Non-Financial Statement 2022 and the Sustainability Report 2022;
  • ≥ identification of key management personnel in the new organisation.
  • In 2023, the Committee has already met on 3 occasions as of March 14, 2023.

Board review and succession of Directors - Nomination Committee

Board review

In compliance with the Corporate Governance Code, also in 2022 Saipem's Board of Directors carried out their annual review concerning the size, composition and functioning of the Board itself and its Committees.

Saipem's Board of Directors conducts its own Board review and that of its Committees on an annual basis.

Pursuant to Article 4, Recommendation 19 of the Corporate Governance Code, the Board of Directors entrusted the Compensation and Nomination Committee with the task of assisting with the Board review. At their meeting of November 15, 2022, the Board of Directors resolved to conduct the 2022 Board review with the support of the Corporate Affairs department.

The Board Review focused on, inter alia, the analysis of the size, composition and functioning of the Board of Directors and its Committees.

All the topics covered by the Board review were evaluated utilising a questionnaire filled in by the members of the Board of Directors and, for matters under their remit, by the members of the various Board Committees.

Conclusions were analysed and discussed at the Board of Directors' meetings of January 25 and March 7, 2023. Specifically, the 2022 Board review found that, in a context characterised by some complexities, the Board of Directors has seen the consolidation of its role of oversight and guidance, of the organisation of Board work, of its interaction with the Committees and the top management and the knowledge of the Company's business. The induction sessions and off-site visits organised by management were assessed as particularly positive. With regard to the composition of the Board, diversity profiles were assessed as adequate, with an indication of a possible future increase in the international experience. Suggestions included the opportunity for further in-depth study of certain topics such as digital and cybersecurity.

Succession plans

In view of the shareholding and governance structure of the Company and, specifically, the Shareholders' Agreement between Eni SpA and CDP Equity SpA (shareholders exercising joint control over the Company), which provides inter alia for the joint appointment by the aforementioned shareholders of the CEO and the Chairman, the Board of Directors has not prepared any succession plans for executive Directors.

The Company adopted a Contingency Plan and a methodology for identifying successors in managerial positions of strategic interest.

With regard to the contingency plan, the Board of Directors at their meeting of July 24, 2017 had approved, at the proposal of the Corporate Governance Committee and Scenarios together with the then Chairman of the Compensation and Nomination Committee, the following plan:

  • a) Contingency Plan for the CEO: should sudden and unforeseen events occur which may prevent the CEO from carrying out his duties, the Board of Directors, following an analysis of the powers granted by the CEO to his direct reports:
  • ≥ ensures that the powers granted by the CEO to his direct reports provide continuity of the Company management; and that
  • ≥ take over the direct management of the powers that the CEO had not delegated to his reports, deciding, depending also on the foreseeable duration of the Contingency Plan, to temporarily reassign all or some of those powers;
  • b) Contingency Plan for the Chairman: should sudden and unforeseen events occur which may prevent the Chairman from carrying out her duties, the Board of Directors ensures that the provisions set forth in the Company's Articles of Association are suitable to manage the consequences of such sudden and unforeseen events.

The then Corporate Governance Committee and Scenarios had inter alia observed that, as it is impossible to estimate a time frame for the application of the Contingency Plan and in the absence of a succession plan, the above recommendations will need to be verified upon the occurrence of sudden events which may prevent the CEO from carrying out his responsibilities, also with regard to the duration of the possible application of a Contingency Plan.

As anticipated, Saipem defined a procedure to identify successors for strategic managerial positions.

This succession plan for the aforementioned positions is a procedure that has been in force at Saipem since 2012. It provides the following phases:

  • ≥ an analytical job description for each position detailing responsibilities, the role's strategic objectives in the near future, managerial experience and competencies required to cover the role;
  • ≥ assessment of the role holder and potential candidates for their succession;
  • ≥ definition of succession tables listing the names of potential successors and development indications;

≥ assessment of the overall risk associated with the position, in consideration of the possible succession plans. Succession plans for positions of strategic interest in Saipem represent a reference point when making decisions concerning managerial development and enhancement.

On July 26, 2022, the Compensation and Nomination Committee, at the request of the Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance Committee, reviewed the succession plans and methodology for Saipem Senior Managers with Strategic Responsibilities. The Committee maintained that, with a view to risk mitigation, it is essential to structure an action plan that envisages:

  • ≥ a structured process aimed at defining and implementing career plans (training, tutoring, shadowing) dedicated to young talents so as to develop their skills;
  • ≥ the use of the external market (through contracted executive search companies) to identify and recruit professional profiles in line with the skills and experience needed to increase the succession pipeline.

The proposed actions will be implemented and monitored on a six-monthly basis to assess progress and possibly review priorities.

Compensation and Nomination Committee

The current Compensation and Nomination Committee is comprised of the following non-executive Board Directors, the majority of whom are independent: Paul Schapira, independent Director and Chairman of the Committee, Alessandra Ferone, non-independent Director, and Paola Tagliavini, independent Director.

The Committee regulations, with the regulations of all the other Board Committees, were last reviewed and approved by the Board of Directors on June 30, 2021.

Under the aforementioned regulations, the Corporate Head of Human Resources (now Director for Human Resources and Organisation), or on his behalf the Head of People Development, Recruitment and Compensation (now Corporate Head of People Development, Recruiting, Training and Compensation), acts as the Secretary of the Committee, responsible for drafting the minutes of meeting and assisting the Committee in its activities.

The Committee fulfils a propositive and consultative role to the Board of Directors, and specifically in matters of remuneration:

  • ≥ submits for approval to the Board of Directors the Report on Saipem's Remuneration Policy and Compensation paid and, in particular, the Remuneration Policy for Directors and Senior Managers with strategic responsibilities, to be submitted for approval at the Shareholders' Meeting called to approve the annual Financial Statements, as provided for by the law;
  • ≥ makes proposals regarding the various forms of compensation of the Chairman and Executive Directors;
  • ≥ makes proposals regarding the compensation of the Directors who sit on the Board Committees;
  • ≥ examines the suggestions of the CEO and proposes the annual and long-term incentive plans, including stock-based plans, the general criteria for the compensation of Senior Managers with strategic responsibilities, identifies Company targets and reviews the results of performance plans connected to both the implementation of incentive plans and the calculation of the variable compensation of Directors with powers;
  • ≥ monitors the implementation of resolutions taken by the Board;
  • ≥ periodically evaluates the adequacy, overall consistency and actual implementation of the adopted policy, formulating proposals to the Board of Directors on the subject.

The Committee fulfils a propositive and consultative role to the Board of Directors, also in matters of nominations. Specifically:

  • ≥ proposes candidates for the role of Director to the Board if, during the course of the financial year one or more Directorships become vacant (Article 2386, paragraph 1 of the Italian Civil Code), ensuring compliance with the regulations on the minimum number of independent Directors and on the quotas reserved for the least represented gender;
  • ≥ provides input to the Board regarding the appointment of senior managers and of the members of the Company's bodies whose appointment is the responsibility of the Board of Directors;
  • ≥ proposes to the Board the succession plan for the CEO and executive directors, identifying the procedures to be applied in case of early terminations;
  • ≥ with regard to the succession plan for Senior Managers with strategic responsibilities, at the proposal of the CEO, the Committee examines and evaluates the criteria for their succession plan, reporting to the Board of Directors so as to ensure that adequate procedures are in place to implement the succession plans.

Furthermore, the Committee:

  • ≥ reports to the Board on the tasks performed, at the Board meetings indicated by the Chairman of the Board of Directors, at least twice yearly, and at any rate no later than the term for approval of the financial statements and the Half-Year Report;
  • ≥ through the Committee Chairman or another member designated by the same, reports on the working procedures of its functions to the Shareholders' Meeting convened to approve the annual financial statements; ≥ assists the Board in the Board review and that of its committees;
  • ≥ assists the Board in expressing, in view of its renewal, the recommendations on the quantitative and qualitative composition considered optimal by the Board and its committees, taking into account the results of the Board review;
  • ≥ assists the Board in the presentation of a list by the outgoing Board of Directors ensuring that it is drafted and presented in a transparent manner.

In fulfilling its duties, the Committee provides opinions, as and when required, by the current internal regulations in terms of transactions with related parties, under the terms provided in the same regulation.

The Board of Directors provides the Committee with the resources necessary to carry out its responsibilities. To fulfil its duties, the Committee has the right to access the required Company information and departments and to avail itself of external advisors who do not find themselves in situations that could compromise the impartiality of their opinion, within the limits of the budget approved by the Board of Directors; the Committee annually defines its budget which is submitted to the Board of Directors for approval.

The Chairman of the Committee reports to the Board on the tasks performed and activities discussed at Committee meetings since the previous Board meeting at the next suitable meeting.

The Chairman of the Board of Statutory Auditors (or other Statutory Auditor designated by the latter) attends Committee meetings; other Statutory Auditors may also attend when the Committee discusses matters for approval by the Board of Directors that are subject to the mandatory opinion of the Board of Statutory Auditors. At the request of the Chairman of the Committee, other persons can be invited to attend Committee meetings to provide information and evaluations within their area of expertise on individual items on the meeting agenda.

The meetings of the Compensation and Nomination Committee are not attended by the Directors when proposals are discussed regarding their remuneration.

In 2022, the Committee convened on 18 occasions, with meetings lasting an average of 1 hour and 50 minutes and attended on average by 100% of members.

The Chairman of the Board of Statutory Auditors or a Statutory Auditor attended all meetings.

The work of the Committee focused on the following:

  • ≥ review of actual 2021 performance results, cancelling the stock-based Long-Term Variable Incentive Plan 2019-2021 (2019 allocation) and non-activation of the Short-Term Incentive Plan for the 2021 performance, both the stock and monetary components;
  • ≥ periodic evaluation of the remuneration policy implemented in 2021, drawing up the Remuneration guidelines for 2022 in light of recent events and Company results; evaluation of the Company's actual results for 2021, and setting performance targets for 2022 vis-à-vis variable incentive plans, in addition to the market benchmarks for similar roles at Saipem peer companies;
  • ≥ definition of the proposal for the 2022 Short-Term Incentive based on 2021 actual results for the CEO-General Manager;
  • ≥ 2022 allocation of shares concerning the 2019 award of the 2019-2021 Long-Term Incentive Plan for the Chief Executive Officer in office during the 2018-2021 mandate;
  • ≥ definition of the Short-Term Variable Incentive Plan 2022 (2022 structure and indicators);
  • ≥ evaluation of the proposal for the appointment of a General Manager;
  • ≥ evaluation of the appointment of the Manager responsible for financial reporting;
  • ≥ review of the findings of the 2021 Board review;
  • ≥ definition of the procedures for the 2022 Board review;
  • ≥ definition of the Compensation and Nomination Committee budget for the year 2023;
  • ≥ finalisation of the 2021 performance results: 2021 Corporate Scorecard and short-term incentives for the Chief Executive Officer-General Manager and Director of Internal Audit;
  • ≥ preparation of the Consob Information Document on the Short-Term Variable Incentive Plan 2022;
  • ≥ preparation of the Report on Remuneration Policy and Compensation Paid 2022;
  • ≥ evaluation of the proposal for the appointment of the Director of Internal Audit;
  • ≥ review of the succession planning process and methodology for Saipem's Senior Managers with Strategic Responsibilities;
  • ≥ evaluation of the nomination proposals for the two new Directors appointed by the Board of Directors;
  • ≥ definition of the proposal of the overall remuneration for the new Chief Executive Officer and General Manager;
  • ≥ review of the contract between Saipem SpA and the Chief Executive Officer-General Manager.
  • The Committee scheduled at least 12 meetings to take place during 2023.

In 2022, the meetings of the Committee were also attended by: the Chief Executive Officer-General Manager, the Chief Financial Officer, the Chief Project Control and Financial Advisory Officer, the Director of Company Affairs and Corporate Governance department, the Head of Finance, the Director of Health, Safety and Environment, the Director of Business Integrity, the Head of Planning and Control, the Head of Sustainability and Governance, the Head of the Environment function, the members of the Related Parties Committee, when discussing issues under their remit. The Committee also availed itself of the services of the independent international consultancy firms Willis Towers Watson and Morrow Sodali, the legal firms MMBA and Chiomenti.

The Committee reports, through the Chairman of the Committee or other person designated by the latter, on the methods used to carry out its responsibilities at the Shareholders' Meeting called to approve the Financial Statements, pursuant to the provisions set forth in the Committee's Regulations and the Corporate Governance Code, with the aim of engaging with shareholders and investors.

Further information on the Compensation and Nomination Committee is provided, in compliance with Article 123-ter of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998, in the "Report on the Remuneration Policy and Compensation Paid".

Directors' compensation

Article 123-ter of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998 has made it compulsory for listed companies to publish a "Report on the Remuneration Policy and Compensation Paid".

For all issues relating to the remuneration of Directors, Statutory Auditors and Senior Managers with Strategic Responsibilities, please refer to the "Report on Remuneration Policy and Compensation Paid", which is available to the public at Saipem's registered office or on the Company's website www.saipem.com under the section "Governance" at least 21 days prior to the General Shareholders' Meeting called to approve the Financial Statements for the year 2022. At the General Shareholders' Meeting, shareholders will be required to cast a binding vote on the first section and a consultative vote on the second section of the same Report, pursuant to current legislation.

The Report on Remuneration Policy and the Compensation Paid is also drawn up by Saipem in compliance with Article 84-quater of Consob Issuers' Regulation (Resolution No. 11971 of May 14, 1999 and subsequent amendments and additions), the recommendations of the 2020 Corporate Governance Code for listed companies and in line with the Shareholder Rights Directive II (SHRD II) and Legislative Decree No. 49/2019 implementing it.

The Report on Remuneration Policy and on the Compensation Paid 2022 was submitted, on May 17, 2022: (i) with reference to Section I, to the binding vote of the Shareholders' Meeting; and (ii) to the advisory vote of the Shareholders' Meeting on Section II relating to compensation paid in 2021 to Directors, Statutory Auditors and Senior Managers with Strategic Responsibilities, obtaining a vote in favour on both Sections.

For further details relating to the remuneration of Directors: specifically concerning the remuneration policy, the remuneration of executive Directors and the top management, stock based remuneration plans, the remuneration of non-executive Directors, accruing and payment of the remuneration, additional remuneration tools for the CEO-General Manager, please refer to the "Report on Remuneration Policy and Compensation Paid", pursuant to Article 123-ter of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998.

Internal Control and Risk Management System

Saipem is committed to promoting and maintaining an adequate Internal Control and Risk Management System consisting of a set of tools, organisational structures, procedures and Company rules and regulations aimed at helping to make informed decisions and safeguarding the Company's assets, the efficiency and effectiveness of Company operations, the reliability of financial reporting and compliance with the laws and regulations of the Articles of Association and Company procedures.

The structure of Saipem's internal control system constitutes an integral part of the Company's organisational and management model; it involves – with different roles – administrative bodies, supervisory bodies, control bodies, the management and all personnel, and complies with the principles contained in the Code of Ethics and the Corporate Governance Code for Italian listed companies - 2020 edition, which Saipem's Board of Directors adopted on December 17, 2020. This subject is regulated in the regulatory tool Management System Guideline "Internal Control and Risk Management System".

The Internal Control system adopted by Saipem conforms to applicable regulations, is consistent with national and international best practices and is based on the relevant "CoSO Report" framework.

The main responsibilities of the Internal Control and Risk Management System are entrusted to Saipem bodies and organs equipped with the necessary powers, tools and structures to pursue its objectives.

Saipem is aware that adequate processes for the identification, measurement, management and monitoring of main risks contribute towards ensuring sound and proper Company management in line with the strategic objectives set out by the Board of Directors. Saipem promotes a preventive approach to risk management whereby the management's decisions and activities aim to reduce the probability of negative events occurring and their associated impact. To this end, Saipem adopts risk management strategies in accordance with the nature and type of risk, mainly financial, strategic and operational risks associated with the specific nature of the Company's operations.

The main business risks that Saipem identifies and monitors are illustrated in the Annual Report 2022, under the section "Risk management".

Saipem is committed to guaranteeing the integrity, transparency, fairness and efficiency of its processes through the adoption of adequate tools, rules and regulations in performing activities and exercising powers, and promotes rules of conduct inspired by the general principles of traceability and segregation of activities. Indeed, Saipem's management – also on the basis of the risks managed – established specific control activities and monitoring processes aimed at ensuring the internal control system's efficacy and efficiency over time. In line with this approach, Saipem has long been committed to favouring the development and diffusion of awareness towards internal control issues amongst all the Company's personnel. In this context, Saipem manages the receipt, through easily accessible information channels, analysis and processing of notification it receives from its subsidiaries, even in confidential or anonymous form (so-called whistleblowing), relating to internal control issues, financial reporting, the Company's administrative responsibility, fraud or other matters. Saipem ensures the full protection for persons who make reports in good faith and submits the results of investigations to senior management and the relevant control and supervisory bodies.

The internal control system is regularly verified and updated, so as to consistently guarantee its ability to monitor the main risk areas of the Company's activities, in relation to the specific nature of the Company's operational divisions and organisational structure, and in response to possible changes within the legal and regulatory framework.

Main features of the risk assessment and internal control systems for the purposes of financial reporting

Foreword

To achieve the aim of the Internal Control and Risk Management System regarding the reliability of financial information, Saipem has adopted an "Internal Control System over Financial Reporting ", which is an integral part of the broader corporate Internal Control and Risk Management System, aimed at providing with reasonable certainty the reliability, accuracy and timeliness of the financial information itself and the ability of the financial reporting process to produce financial information in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

In accordance with the provisions of the law, the Senior Manager responsible for financial reporting is responsible for the internal control system governing financial information and, to this end, prepares the administrative and accounting procedures for the preparation of the periodic accounting documentation and any other financial disclosure, certifying, together with the Chief Executive Officer, in a specific report on the statutory financial statements, the half-year interim financial statements and the consolidated financial statements, their adequacy and effective application during the relevant period. Pursuant to Article 154-bis of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998, the Board of Directors ascertains whether the Senior Manager responsible for Financial Reporting has appropriate powers and means to perform the assigned duties, in addition to supervising the actual conformity to these procedures.

The Management System Guideline "Internal Control System over Financial Reporting" defines the rules and methodologies for the design, implementation, monitoring and updating of the Internal Control System on Saipem external communication for the evaluation of its effectiveness.

These regulations and methodologies have been designed in accordance with the provisions of Article 154-bis of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998 and reviewed in light of the provisions of the framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (CoSO) in May 2013, which detail 17 principles for the 5 components of the internal control system that, if correctly applied, guarantee its effectiveness.

The Management System Guideline "Internal Control System over Financial Reporting" applies to Saipem and to all direct and indirect subsidiaries both in Italy and abroad, in compliance with international accounting standards and in consideration of their relevance for the preparation of financial reporting. All controlled companies, regardless of their relevance with respect to Saipem's internal control system, use this Management System Guideline as a reference for the design and implementation of their own internal control system, in order to ensure its adequacy in relation to the size of the company and the nature of its business.

The Internal Control System over Financial Reporting adopted by Saipem in compliance with the provisions of the CoSO Framework, is based on the following components:

≥ identification of the scope of application (Risk Assessment);

  • ≥ identification and maintenance of controls, which in turn is subdivided in identification and updating of the following components of the Internal Control over Financial Reporting:
  • Entity Level Controls (ELC);
  • Process Level Controls (PLC);
  • IT General Controls (ITGC);
  • Segregation of Duties (SOD);
  • anti-fraud programmes and controls;

≥ line and independent monitoring.

The integrated operation of these components ensures both the reliability of the financial information and the ability of the relevant business processes to produce this Information in accordance with the relevant legislation and generally accepted accounting principles.

Main features of the risk assessment and internal control systems for the purposes of financial reporting

The design, implementation and maintenance of the internal control system are ensured through: (a) risk

assessment, (b) control identification, (c) control evaluation and (d) reporting. (a) The risk assessment process has a top-down approach aimed at identifying those organisational departments, processes and specific activities that bear the risk of unintentional errors and/or fraud, which could have a material impact on the financial statements.

The identification of companies that fall within the scope of the internal control system over financial reporting8 is based both on their contribution to the consolidated financial statements (turnover, net debt, net revenues, and profits before taxation) and their relevance in terms of processes and specific risks, whose actual occurrence could the reliability and accuracy of financial reporting. Within the companies identified as relevant for the purposes of internal control system over financial reporting, significant processes are then identified based on an analysis of quantitative factors (processes involved in the calculation of items featured in the financial statements which are greater than a certain percentage of profits before taxation), as well as qualitative factors (for instance: complexity of the accounting treatment used for an item; new items or significant changes in business conditions).

Risks are assessed for relevant processes and activities, i.e. potential events whose occurrence could compromise the achievement of the control objectives for financial reporting (for instance accounting assertions). These risks are prioritised in terms of their potential impact and likelihood of occurrence, based on quantitative and qualitative parameters and assuming no controls (inherent risk assessment). Saipem carries out a specific assessment on risks of fraud9, using a methodology based on the "Anti-fraud Programmes and Controls' included in the Management System Guideline "Internal Controls over Financial Reporting".

(b) Controls are defined for the individual company, processes and associated risks based on two fundamental principles: the dissemination of controls at all levels of the organisational structure, consistently with the operational responsibilities, and the sustainability of controls over time, so that their performance is integrated and compatible with operational requirements.

The structure of the control system comprises Entity Level Controls (ELC) which operate transversally within the entity (Group / individual company) and Process Level Controls (PLC).

Entity Level Controls are organised into a checklist based on the model adopted in the CoSO Report, i.e. divided into five components of the internal control system (control environment, risk assessment, control activities, IT

(8) Companies subject to internal controls include those incorporated under and regulated by non-EU member state legislations, for which the provisions of Article 15 of Consob Market Regulations apply.

(9) Fraud: for the purposes of the Internal Control System, this refers to any international act or omission that may result in false representation or misleading reporting.

systems and information flows, and monitoring activities) and 17 principles whose existence and correct implementation are essential to ensure the effective operation of the single components of the internal control system.

Specifically, the "control environment" component includes all activities relating to the definition of timeframes for the preparation and publication of financial results (interim and annual financial statements and associated financial calendars); the "control activities" component covers organisational and regulatory structures that guarantee the achievement of financial reporting objectives (for instance the review and updating by specific departments of rules relating to the preparation of financial statements and charts of accounts); the component "Information and communication" includes management controls over the consolidation process. Process level controls are divided into:

  • ≥ specific controls, which are identified as all activities, both manual and automated, aimed at preventing, identifying and correcting errors and irregularities occurring during operational activities;
  • ≥ pervasive controls, which are structural elements of the internal control system aimed at establishing a general environment which promotes the correct execution and control of operational activities. Pervasive controls include those concerning the segregation of incompatible duties and IT general controls.

Specific controls are detailed in ad-hoc procedures which define Company processes and the "key controls", whose absence or non-implementation entails the risk of significant error/fraud in the financial statements which cannot be detected by other controls.

(c) Entity Level Controls and Process Level Controls are constantly monitored to evaluate their design and operational effectiveness over time; this is done by means of ongoing monitoring activities carried out by the managers in charge of the relevant processes/activities, and through separate evaluations carried out by the Internal Audit function and by an external consultant, in accordance with an audit plan provided by the Director responsible for the Company's Financial Reporting, which defines the audit scope and objectives to be implemented through agreed-upon audit procedures.

Monitoring activities highlight possible deficiencies in the control system; these are evaluated in terms of probability of occurrence and impact on Saipem's financial reporting and, based on their significance, are classed as "control deficiency", "significant deficiency" and/or "material weakness". When shortcomings are identified visà-vis the reference model, these are defined, and corrective actions are promptly implemented to eliminate them. (d) The findings of monitoring activities regarding the state of the internal control system are periodically reported using IT tools that ensure the traceability of information relating to the adequacy of design and the operational effectiveness of controls.

On the basis of this reporting, the Senior Manager responsible for Financial Reporting draws up a half-yearly and annual report on the adequacy and effective application of the control system over financial reporting. The report, shared with the Chief Executive Officer, is sent to the Board of Directors, after examination by the Audit and Risk Committee, upon the approval of the draft statutory financial statements and the Half-Year Financial Report, in order to allow the performance of checks, as well as the assessments on the internal control system over financial reporting.

The work of the Director responsible for the Company's Financial Reporting is supported by various departments within Saipem, whose responsibilities and tasks are set out in the aforementioned Management System Guideline. Specifically, internal controls involve all levels of Saipem's organisation, from operations managers to function and administrative managers. In this organisational context, a very important figure of the internal control system is the risk owner, who carries out line monitoring activities, evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of specific and pervasive controls and producing reports on monitoring activities.

The Financial Reporting Internal Control System function provides operational support to the Senior Manager responsible for Financial Reporting; the former coordinates Saipem's Internal Control System on Financial Reporting (SCIF), guaranteeing methodological assistance to the functions and companies involved in the establishment and maintenance of the Control System, as well as streamlining the information flows relating to the Internal Control System on Financial Information (SCIF) to the top management and to the Senior Manager responsible for financial reporting, also preparing the reports on the state of the system. This function is also responsible for contributing to the preparation and updating of the regulatory documents of Saipem and its subsidiaries and managing training activities on the Internal Control System on Financial Information (SCIF) for Saipem's personnel, through online courses (e-learning).

The Internal Control System on Financial Information (SCIF) is constantly updated vis-à-vis the identification of new risks or to incorporate changes at organisational level, at process level or to the supporting IT systems. The SCIF is also promptly amended when information is received from the various corporate functions and control bodies following the results of (line and independent) monitoring and of Internal/External Audit activities.

The Board of Directors

The Board of Directors plays a key role with regard to internal control matters, as it defines the guidelines of the organisational, management and accounting structure of the Company, its main subsidiaries and the Group as a whole. In this context, after analysing the proposals of the Audit and Risk Committee, the Board determines the nature and level of risk commensurate with the Company's strategic objectives and the guidelines for the Internal Control and Risk Management System, so as to guarantee that the major risks affecting the Company and its subsidiaries are identified, measured, managed and monitored. In defining these guidelines, the Board applies the sector regulations and takes into due consideration the reference models and national/international best practices. The Board of Directors carries out its role in guiding and evaluating the adequacy of the Internal Control and Risk Management System.

The Board assesses – on an annual basis and with the assistance of the Audit and Risk Committee – the adequacy, effectiveness and actual functionality of the Internal Control and Risk Management System as a whole, in relation to Saipem's characteristics. At the meetings of March 7 and 14, 2023, the Board of Directors reviewed:

  • ≥ the Report by the Senior Manager responsible for the Company's Financial Reporting at December 31, 2022, which found that the internal control over financial reporting in force at December 31, 2022 to be adequate and without any material weaknesses for the purposes of Article 154-bis of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998;
  • ≥ the Report by the Internal Audit function at December 31, 2022, which found the Internal Control and Risk Management System to be altogether adequate;
  • ≥ the Report by the Compliance Committee covering the second half of 2022, which found that no elements had emerged which caused Model 231 of Saipem SpA to be deemed inadequate, nor its associated operating procedures;
  • ≥ the Report by the Audit and Risk Committee for the financial year 2022, which found that no circumstances emerged that would lead to the conclusion that the Company's Internal Control and Risk Management System as a whole was not adequate.

The Board of Directors at their meeting of March 14, 2023, based on the information received from management, as well as the aforementioned reports issued by the Compliance Committee, the Senior Manager responsible for Financial Reporting, the Director of Internal Audit and the Audit and Risk Committee, deemed: (i) the organisational, administrative and accounting structure of the Company and the Group to be adequate for the Company's size and type of business; (ii) the Internal Control and Risk Management System of the Company and the Group to be adequate with respect to the characteristics of the business and its risk profile, as well as its effectiveness.

Director responsible for the Internal Control System

In compliance with the provisions contained in the document "Management System Guidelines - Internal Control and Risk Management System", the Board of Directors appointed, in 2015, the CEO as the Director responsible for maintaining a functional Internal Control System.

The CEO identifies the Company's main business risks, taking into account the characteristics of the activities carried out by the Issuer and its subsidiaries and periodically reporting his findings for review by the Board of Directors; implements the guidelines for the Internal Control and Risk Management System approved by the Board itself; and is responsible for amending this system to suit the dynamics of the operating conditions and legislative and regulatory frameworks; provides the Board of Directors with the necessary information to fulfil its responsibilities, explaining the system for the identification, monitoring and management of risks, the relevant procedures, standards and Company departments.

The CEO also has the power to request that the Internal Audit function carry out audits on specific operational areas and/or ascertain adherence to internal corporate procedures, reporting their findings to the Chairman of the Board of Directors, the Chairman of the Audit and Risk Committee and the Chairman of the Board of Statutory Auditors. The Internal Audit function also promptly informs the Board of Directors of problems and critical issues that may emerge while fulfilling its responsibilities or that it became aware of, so that the Board of Directors may take appropriate action.

Board of Statutory Auditors

The Board of Statutory Auditors, given its role of "Committee for internal control and auditing" pursuant to Italian Legislative Decree No. 39/2010 (as amended by Legislative Decree No. 135/2016), supervises:

  • ≥ compliance with the law and Articles of Association; adherence to fair management principles;
  • ≥ the adequacy of the Company's organisational structure within each area of competence, of the Internal Control and Risk Management System, and the administrative/accounting system, as well as the reliability of the latter to provide a fair reflection of business operations;
  • ≥ the implementation of corporate governance regulations contained in the Corporate Governance Code issued by Borsa Italiana to which the Company adheres;
  • ≥ the adequacy of directions given by the Company to its subsidiaries pursuant to Article 114, paragraph 2, of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998;
  • ≥ the process of financial reporting;
  • ≥ the efficiency of the internal control, internal audit and risk management systems; the legal audit of annual statutory and consolidated accounts;
  • ≥ the independence of the external auditors, specifically for the provision of non-audit services to the audited company;
  • ≥ the procedure to be applied for the appointment of external audit firm.

Audit and Risk Committee

Saipem's Board of Directors set up the Audit and Risk Committee.

Composition and operation of the Audit and Risk Committee (pursuant to Article 123-bis, paragraph 2, letter d), of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998)

On May 18, 2021, the Board of Directors, appointed by the Shareholders' Meeting on April 30, 2021, appointed as members of the Audit and Risk Committee the following non-executive all independent Board Directors: Paola Tagliavini (Chairman), Roberto Diacetti and Paul Schapira.

The Committee, in general, possesses adequate competencies in the areas in which the Company operates, enabling the relevant risk evaluation; at least one Committee member has adequate accounting, financial and risk management experience.

The Chairman may, from time to time, invite to the meetings of the Committee the Director responsible for the Internal Control and Risk Management System, the Chief Integrated Risk Management Officer, the CFO, the heads of the business lines and/or other members of the Board of Directors, representatives of the corporate functions, or third parties, whose presence may help to support the functions of the Committee itself.

The Regulations of the Audit and Risk Committee were last approved on June 30, 2021.

At the Chairman's proposal, the Committee appoints a Secretary, who may or may not be a member.

Functions of the Audit and Risk Committee

The Committee assists the Board of Directors providing consulting and advisory functions, supporting the assessments and decisions of the Board of Directors in carrying out its duties in relation to the Internal Control and Risk Management System, as well as those regarding the approval of the periodic reports of a financial and nonfinancial nature.

The Audit and Risk Committee has the following responsibilities:

  • ≥ having heard the opinion of the Senior Manager responsible for financial reporting, of the independent auditors and of the Board of Statutory Auditors, the Committee evaluates whether accounting standards are utilised properly and whether they are sufficiently homogeneous for the purposes of drafting the annual financial statement and the half-year report prior to their approval by the Board of Directors;
  • ≥ assesses that the periodic financial and non-financial information correctly represents the business model, the strategies of the Company, the impact of its activities and its performance, liaising, vis-à-vis the periodic nonfinancial information, with the Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance Committee;
  • ≥ examines the content of the periodic non-financial information relevant for the purposes of the Internal Control and Risk Management System;
  • ≥ when requested by the Director responsible for the Internal Control and Risk Management System, gives its opinion on specific aspects of the process for identifying major Company risks and monitoring of the legal risk and the risk of non-compliance, as well as on planning, implementation and management of the Internal Control and Risk Management System;
  • ≥ supports the assessments and decisions of the Board of Directors regarding the management of risks deriving from negative issues that have come to the attention of the Board of Directors;
  • ≥ examines the results of particular significance, periodic reports and indicators of Internal Audit activities;
  • ≥ supervises the operations of the Internal Audit function and those of the Head of the Internal Audit function so that these are carried out under conditions of independence, due objectivity, competence and professional diligence, in compliance with the Company's Code of Ethics;
  • ≥ asks the Head of Saipem Internal Audit function to carry out audits not provided for in the Internal Audit Plan, simultaneously notifying the Chairman of the Board of Statutory Auditors of Saipem SpA;
  • ≥ expresses an assessment, at least every six months, of the adequacy, effectiveness and effective functioning of the Internal Control and Risk Management System vis-à-vis the characteristics of the Company and its risk profile; to this end it reports to the Board of Directors, at least on the occasion of the approval of the Annual and Half-Year Financial Reports, on the activities carried out and on the adequacy of the Internal Control and Risk Management System, at the Board meeting indicated by the Chairman of the Board.

The Audit and Risk Committee, in the performance of its responsibilities, has access to information and Company departments, as required, to carry out its duties. The Audit and Risk Committee can draw on the necessary financial resources, approved by the Board of Directors, to carry out its responsibilities.

The Chairman of the Committee provides reports to the Board of Directors on Committee activities and topics discussed since the latest Board of Directors meeting, at the earliest Board meeting possible. Committee meetings are duly minuted.

The Committee also ensures the information flow towards the Board of Statutory Auditors to enable the prompt exchange of the information necessary for the fulfilment of their respective responsibilities within the common remit and to ensure the orderly performance of business functions.

The Audit and Risk Committee convened 19 times in 2022, with meetings lasting on average 2 hours and 46 minutes, and average attendance of 95% of members.

In 2022, depending on the topics under discussion at the meetings, the Audit and Risk Committee was attended by, among others, the Heads of the following functions: Administration, Finance and Control, Strategy, M&A and Investor Relations (in the person of the CFO/Senior Manager responsible for financial reporting); Internal Control System over Financial Reporting, Legal and Contract Management; Internal Audit; Human Resources, Organisation and Services; Anti-Corruption; Risk Management; HSEQ; Security; Internal Control System on Non-Financial Reporting.

All meetings were attended by one or more members of the Board of Statutory Auditors.

During these meetings, the Audit and Risk Committee:

  • ≥ approved the Audit Plan and the annual 2022 budget of the Internal Audit function, having heard the opinions of the Board of Statutory Auditors and the CEO;
  • ≥ reviewed the outcome of audits and progress reports for activities carried out by this function, and expressed, for the portion within its remit, a negative assurance on the adequacy and efficiency of the Internal Control and Risk Management System during 2021 and 2022;
  • ≥ monitored the autonomy, adequacy, effectiveness and efficiency of the Internal Audit function;
  • ≥ reviewed and evaluated information received from the Board of Statutory Auditors and its members vis-à-vis the Internal Control and Risk Management System, with regard to preliminary investigations carried out by the Internal Audit function following the receipt of notification by whistleblowers;
  • ≥ acquired the information provided by the General Counsel, Contract Management, Company Affairs, Governance and Public Affairs, and/or the relevant functions, with particular reference to the information relating to the monitoring of legal risk and non-compliance;
  • ≥ examined updates from the Risk Management function concerning ongoing activities;
  • ≥ met with the Senior Manager responsible for the Company's Financial Reporting, the Chairman of the Board of Statutory Auditors and the partner from the Independent Auditors to examine the main issues pertaining to the 2021 and 2022 Financial Statements, specifically reviewing the impairment test procedure.

In 2023, as of March 14, 2023, the Committee has already met on 6 occasions.

Director responsible for the Internal Audit function

The Director responsible for the Internal Audit function, Maurizio Bonzi, has held this position since July 1, 2022, replacing Luigi Siri. He reports hierarchically to the Board of Directors and, on its behalf, to the Chairman of the Board, except for those duties that fall under the remit of the Audit and Risk Committee and the CEO, in his capacity as Officer responsible for the Internal Control and Risk Management System. The Board of Directors, at the indication of the Compensation and Nomination Committee, set the remuneration of the Director responsible for Internal Audit.

The Director responsible for the Internal Audit function is responsible for overseeing that the Internal Control and Risk Management system is fully operational and effective; he is not responsible for any operative area and has direct access to all information it requires to carry out its duties.

The Audit and Risk Committee oversees the functions of the Internal Audit function vis-à-vis the relevant Board of Directors' responsibilities, monitoring and ensuring that these are fulfilled while maintaining the necessary conditions of independence, autonomy, adequacy, effectiveness and efficiency. The Director responsible for Internal Audit reports to the Board of Statutory Auditors in its capacity as "internal control and audit committee" pursuant to Article 19 of Legislative Decree No. 39/2010, as amended by Legislative Decree No. 135/2016.

The Director responsible for the Internal Audit function has the powers to enter into contracts for consultancy and professional services, having access to adequate funds (up to €750,000 per transaction for contracts with juridical persons and up to €500,000 per transaction for contracts with physical persons – with no budget restrictions).

In 2022, the Internal Audit function carried out the Audit Plan approved by the Board of Directors at their meeting of March 24, 2022, including assessments on the reliability of IT and accounting systems, and provided regular and periodic information on its progress to the Audit and Risk Committee, the Board of Statutory Auditors and the Compliance Committee for the parts under its remit.

On March 14, 2023, the Director responsible for the Internal Audit function released the Annual Report on the most salient activities carried out by Saipem's Internal Audit function (covering the period January 1-December 31, 2022, containing information up to the date of issue) and expressed his opinion on the suitability of the Control and Risk Management System based on the monitoring activities carried out during the reference period.

In line with the "Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Audit" issued by the "Institute of Internal Auditors", the Internal Audit function is responsible for providing independent and objective activities aimed at promoting efficiency and effectiveness, improving measures in the Internal Control and Risk Management System and the Company's organisation.

The Internal Audit function assists the Board of Directors, the Audit and Risk Committee and the Company's management in pursuing the objectives of the organisation through a systematic professional approach, aimed at reviewing and improving processes of control, risk management and corporate governance.

Main responsibilities of the Internal Audit function are: (i) supervise the verification of the Risk Management and Internal Control System operation and appropriateness in Saipem and in its subsidiaries, also supporting the evaluations by relevant company control bodies, through the integrated planning of audit and Model 231 compliance interventions and the execution of interventions, including the unplanned ones, and the monitoring of implementation of corrective measures. The audit plan, approved by the Board of Directors, after consulting the Audit and Risk Committee, the Chairman of the Board of Directors, the Chief Executive Officer and the Board of Statutory Auditors, is drawn up on the basis of a procedure that takes into account the relevance and coverage of main corporate risks; (ii) ensure specialised support to the Management on risk management and internal control fields in order to facilitate the effectiveness, the efficiency and the integration of controls within company processes; (iii) ensure the independent monitoring actions in accordance with internal control models adopted by the Company; (iv) ensure the management of preliminary investigation activities in relation to submissions, also anonymous; (v) ensure the activities related to the assignment of tasks to Independent Auditors and the administrative management of relationships with them; (vi) ensure support to the Audit and Risk Committee, also in respect of its secretariat duties, and to the Board of Statutory Auditors in ensuring that they receive the information necessary to carry out their duties; (vii) maintaining relations and ensuring proper information flows with the Audit and Risk Committee, the Board of Statutory Auditors and the Compliance Committee.

Risk Management

Saipem, on the basis of the principles approved by the Board of Directors, developed and implemented the Integrated Risk Management Model, which forms an integral part of the Internal Control and Risk Management System.

The Model, developed in accordance with international principles and best practices10, is intended to provide both a comprehensive and summary vision of Company risks, to ensure greater consistency in the methods and instruments used to support risk management, and to strengthen the belief at all levels that adequate assessment and management of risks of different natures can influence the achievement of Company objectives and affects its value.

The Model comprises the following elements:

  • ≥ Risk Governance: the main framework of roles, responsibilities and information flows used in the management of main company risks; for these risks the reference model has roles and responsibilities over three levels of control11;
  • ≥ Process: all activities, through which the various actors identify, measure, represent and monitor main risks which could affect the achievement of Saipem's objectives;
  • ≥ Reporting: gathers Risk Assessment findings from risk analyses aimed at highlighting the main risks and identifying corresponding remedial plans.

Within the Risk Governance, Saipem's Board of Directors, with the prior opinion of the Audit and Risk Committee, defines the Risk and Internal Control Management System policies so that major risks are correctly identified, as well as correctly measured, managed and monitored. Moreover, Saipem's Board of Directors, as part of its duties and management role, determines, with the prior opinion (even in the form of negative assurance) of the Audit and Risk Committee, the degree of compatibility of such risks with the strategic objectives of the Company. Accordingly, Saipem's Board of Directors examines the status of Saipem's major risks at least every six months, as presented by the CEO, taking into account the characteristics of the Company and the specific risk profile of each business area and single process, so as to implement an integrated risk governance policy.

The Risk Governance area includes the Integrated Risk Management function, established in October 2022 and placed, in line with international best practices, under the direct authority of the Chief Executive Officer. This function oversees the development and maintenance of Saipem's Risk Management system for the identification, analysis, treatment and monitoring of corporate risks, in accordance with the guidelines defined by the Board of Directors in relation to the Internal Control and Risk Management System, the integration of the Risk Management process at all levels of corporate management, the Risk Assessment process, the presentation of the results of the main risks and relative treatment plans to the other administrative, control and supervisory bodies, and the development and dissemination of a corporate culture oriented towards Risk Management.

With reference to the risk management processes, please note the following sub-processes: "risk management guidelines", as anticipated, and "risk assessment" aimed at identifying and assessing the main risks and defining the relative remedial actions. Depending on the strategic objectives defined by the Business Area, functions/organisational units are identified that are expected to contribute significantly to their achievement. Hence, using a top-down approach, the so-called "risk owners" are held responsible for identifying and assessing, managing and monitoring the major risks under their responsibility, as well as any related remedial actions. Specifically, the activity aims at identifying and describing the main events that could affect the achievement of business objectives, maintaining, where applicable, a view on their potential impacts on active and prospective projects in the backlog. It assesses risks that have been identified and provides information on which strategies and measures need to be implemented to address them.

Following the risk assessment process, the most appropriate strategies, also integrated and synergetic at portfolio level, are defined on how to treat risks so as to avoid, accept, reduce, transfer, share or balance such risks.

The top risks monitoring ensures the monitoring of major risks and the related treatment plans.

Specifically, monitoring of top risks allows the: (i) identification of the improvement areas and critical issues for the management of major risks; (ii) analysis of these risks trends and identification of any additional treatment, also considering the adjustment and development of risk management models; (iii) timely identification and

(10) Refer to CoSO Report.

(11) Includes the Risk Management functions.

communication of new risks. Performance of the monitoring activities is documented to ensure its traceability and checking the availability of information and data obtained, as well as their repeatability.

The reporting ensures that activities are properly reported relating to the sub-processes "risk assessment" and "top risks monitoring" to the other management, control and compliance bodies.

In 2022, an annual risk assessment cycle was carried out. The evolution of the internal/external context and Saipem's strategy formed the basis for the identification, shared with the management, of strategic lines of action and mitigation/management measures for main risks identified by the assessment. An up-to-date and in-depth analysis was carried out for the identification, assessment and remedial criteria Saipem's top risks and was presented to the Board of Directors in February 2023.

Business Integrity

To reinforce the independence of Saipem's Business Integrity system and to increase the focus of the corporate structure on the analysis and continuous improvement of its compliance system, with an Internal Communication dated December 13, 2021 and effective January 14, 2022, within the new Saipem organisational structure, the Business Integrity function was placed under the direct reporting of the Chief Executive Officer and General Manager. This organisation was subsequently confirmed with an Internal Communication dated October 1, 2022. The Business Integrity function, in relation to compliance issues, is responsible for ensuring Saipem's compliance with applicable regulations on administrative/corporate liability and Anti-Corruption.

In addition, (a) supervises at group level:

  • ≥ the management of specialist legal assistance in the areas of administrative/corporate liability and Anti-Corruption regulations/policies;
  • ≥ the monitoring of the overall system of compliance with applicable national and international regulations on administrative/corporate liability and Anti-Corruption regulations/policies;
  • ≥ the activities in its capacity as Anti-Corruption Legal Support Unit as provided for in the relevant corporate procedures.

(b) performs the activities of Technical Secretariat of Saipem's Compliance Committee and head of the 231 Team for updating the 231 Model.

Furthermore, the Business Integrity function was assigned the task of providing methodological guidance and assistance to the Compliance Committees of Saipem Group companies.

The Risk Management process, the Organisational Model pursuant to Legislative Decree No. 231/2001 / Compliance Committee and the Anti-Corruption Procedures are described below.

Organisational Model pursuant to Legislative Decree No. 231/2001 / Compliance Committee

From 2004, the Board of Directors has adopted its "Organisational, Management and Control model, pursuant to Legislative Decree No. 231/2001" and established a Compliance Committee. The Model constitutes a tool for the prevention of administrative liability of entities pursuant to the aforementioned Legislative Decree No. 231/2001.

The Boards of Directors of all subsidiaries have adopted their own Organisational, Management and Control Models, containing the Code of Ethics, and also setting up their own Compliance Committees.

Also, in order to improve corporate governance and increase efficiency in monitoring the compliance of Saipem Group subsidiaries, in 2014, a new risk-based classification system was introduced, dividing companies into the following four clusters:

  • ≥ "A" highly strategic subsidiaries;
  • ≥ "B" strategic subsidiaries and holdings;
  • ≥ "C" other operational subsidiaries;
  • ≥ "D" non-operational subsidiaries.

Therefore, new rules were introduced regulating Compliance Committees' composition in accordance with the aforementioned classification. It is noted that the Compliance Committee of Cluster "A" companies also performs the function of the Board of Statutory Auditors (Audit and Compliance Committee).

In 2016, the then Corporate Governance Committee and Scenarios, having taken into account the opinions of the Audit and Risk Committee and of the Compensation and Nomination Committee in office at the time, had proposed to the Board of Directors the adoption of new criteria for the appointment of Directors at Cluster "A" companies, i.e. the Board of Directors is to be comprised of 5 members, 2 of which are also members of the Audit and Compliance Committee.

On December 13, 2022, the Board of Directors, with a view to continuous improvement, approved the revision of the process relating to the clustering of Saipem Group subsidiaries.

It was resolved to reclassify them according to risk-based criteria by grouping them into 3 clusters – as follows:

  • ≥ "A" strategically significant subsidiaries high risk;
  • ≥ "B" strategically important subsidiaries, operating and holding companies medium risk;
  • ≥ "C" other operational and non-operational subsidiaries low risk.

Cluster "A" companies have maintained the same criteria for the appointment of Directors, with the Board of Directors consisting of five members, two of whom are members of the Audit and Compliance Committee.

Saipem's Compliance Committee reports on the implementation and adequacy of Model 231 and/or critical issues that may have arisen and informs on the outcome of activities carried out as part of their remit. The Compliance Committee reports as follows: on an ongoing basis to the CEO, who informs the Board of Directors as part of the duty of disclosure of delegate powers; six-monthly to the Board of Directors, to the Audit and Risk Committee and to the Board of Statutory Auditors; in this case a Half-Year Report is produced detailing activities and the findings of audits they carried out during the period, as well as new legislative provisions they may have been issued on matters concerning the administrative liability of legal entities.

In 2022, the Compliance Committee convened on 14 occasions to carry out its role of monitoring the effectiveness and adequacy, as well as the implementation and updating of Model 231, and its function as Guarantor of the Code of Ethics (paragraph 4.2.1 of the Code of Ethics). Its activities focused on:

  • ≥ systematic and periodic monitoring of legal proceedings involving Saipem, requesting regular updates from the relevant Company functions tasked with following their evolution;
  • ≥ co-ordination with the functions responsible for Internal Control, those supporting the activities of the Compliance Committee, and those responsible for critical or relevant processes;
  • ≥ organisational changes implemented and/or desirable in view of legal changes (new offences) and changes in the Company's organisation;
  • ≥ management of notification received, also in its capacity as Guarantor of the Code of Ethics;
  • ≥ activities involving information, divulgation and training through tailored initiatives.

The Compliance Committee remains in office for the same period as the Board of Directors that appointed it.

On December 17, 2021, the Board of Directors, at the CEO's proposal and in agreement with the Chairman, having consulted the Audit and Risk Committee and received the opinions of Board of Statutory Auditors and the Compensation and Nomination Committee, resolved to update the composition of the Compliance Committee, with effect from January 14, 2021, by appointing 3 external members: Renato Rordorf (Chairman), Maurizio Bortolotto and Stefania Chiaruttini.

The Compliance Committee shall continue to avail itself of the collaboration and support of corporate functions to ensure adequate information flows, as well as of the support of the Technical Secretariat of the Compliance Committee.

Anti-corruption procedures

In line with the values that underpin Saipem's activities, namely its ability to conduct business ethically, with loyalty, fairness, transparency, honesty and integrity and its respect for, and compliance with the laws, the Board of Directors in 2010 approved the adoption of additional detailed internal procedures aimed at preventing the corruption of both Italian and foreign public officials, by improving the current compliance system. Specifically, the Board adopted the "Anti-Corruption Compliance Guideline" and complementary procedures relating to due diligence activities on third parties. These documents refer to international conventions on anti-corruption and are also in line with international best practice. These procedures were approved by the Board of Directors of all Saipem subsidiaries; at associated companies, Saipem's representatives on the Boards of Directors informed that these anti-corruption procedures had been adopted at corporate level and formally requested that the principles contained therein be adopted through similar ad-hoc procedures.

Furthermore, several years ago Saipem set up an internal "Anti-Corruption Unit Legal Support Unit" to provide Saipem employees with legal support in matters of anti-corruption.

On December 20, 2019, Saipem issued the latest revision of the "Anti-corruption" Management System Guideline, rolled out to all Saipem personnel. The Management System Guideline "Anti-Corruption" has been adopted by all Saipem subsidiaries through a Board of Directors' resolution.

Saipem's compliance and corporate governance systems in terms of anti-corruption regulations also provides for Anti-Corruption Regulatory instruments, aimed at preventing risks relating to areas and subjects that are particularly prone to corruption. Specifically, these include:

≥ whistleblowing reports, anonymous or otherwise;

  • ≥ gifts and hospitality expenses;
  • ≥ joint venture contracts;
  • ≥ minimum requisites for contractual clauses in matters of administrative liability and anticorruption;
  • ≥ anti-corruption provisions included in Saipem's internal regulatory documents governing Saipem sales or acquisitions;
  • ≥ no profit and local community initiatives;
  • ≥ appointment of external lawyers;
  • ≥ purchase of third-party consultancy, supply and professional services;
  • ≥ sponsorship contracts;
  • ≥ anti-corruption provisions included in Saipem internal regulatory documents governing personnel recruitment;
  • ≥ missions and out-of-office services;
  • ≥ anti-corruption provisions included in Saipem internal regulatory accounting documents;
  • ≥ anti-corruption provisions included in Saipem internal regulatory documents governing the selection of Covered Business Partners;
  • ≥ relations with Public Officials and Relevant Private Bodies;
  • ≥ anti-corruption provisions in Saipem's internal regulations governing investments and divestments.

These subjects have been reviewed in light of the principles and updates contained in the aforementioned "Anticorruption" Management System Guideline and are constantly updated.

External auditors

The legal audit of Saipem's financial statements is entrusted – pursuant to the law – to an external audit company registered in the Consob special registry and appointed by the Shareholders' Meeting, upon a reasoned proposal by the Board of Statutory Auditors. The current external auditors are KPMG SpA, whose mandate was approved by the Shareholders' Meeting of May 3, 2018, for the financial years 2019-2027.

The financial statements of subsidiary companies are also subject to audit; these are carried out mostly by KPMG SpA.

With regard to the opinion on the consolidated financial statements, KPMG SpA is responsible for the audits carried out at subsidiary companies by other external auditors.

The external auditors have full access to all data, documents and information required to carry out their duties In compliance with Recommendation 33, letter F) of the Corporate Governance Code, Saipem Board of Directors, at their meeting on May 19, 2022, reviewed the results of the statutory audit of the 2021 financial year.

Senior Manager responsible for the Company's Financial Reporting

Pursuant to Article 21 of Articles of Association and Article 154-bis of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998, the Board of Directors, having heard the opinion of the Board of Statutory Auditors, having consulted the Compensation and Nomination Committee, and at the Chairman's proposal and in agreement with the CEO, appoints a Director responsible for the Company's Financial Reporting, selected from individuals who have carried out the following for at least three years:

a) administrative and control activities in a managerial capacity at listed companies with a share capital exceeding €1 million, in Italy, in other European Union or OECD member states; or

b) legal audits at companies under letter a); or

c) having had a professional position in the field of or as a university professor teaching finances or accounting; or d) a management position at public or private companies with financial, accounting or control responsibilities.

The Board of Directors ensures that the Director responsible for the Company's Financial Reporting is granted adequate powers and has sufficient means to carry out his duties; the Board also ascertains that the administrative and accounting procedures are adhered to. The Director responsible for the Company's Financial Reporting has the power to enter into, using the most appropriate clauses including the arbitration clause, modify and terminate contracts for the provision of intellectual work and professional services, in his capacity as Senior Manager responsible for Financial Reporting pursuant to Article 154-bis of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998, up to the sum of €750,000 per single contract.

On May 27, 2022, the Board of Directors appointed Paolo Calcagnini, Saipem's Chief Financial Officer from the same date, as the Senior Manager responsible for the Company's Financial Reporting, pursuant to Article 154-bis of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998., replacing Antonio Paccioretti, who had been in office since June 1, 2021.

The Board of Directors ascertained that Mr. Calcagnini met the criteria of professional competence and good repute required by the Articles of Association, which are reviewed annually (last time on March 7, 2023).

Coordination of bodies involved in the Internal Control and Risk Management System

Saipem's Board of Directors assesses, twice yearly, the adequacy, efficacy and effective workings of the Internal Control and Risk Management System, with respect to the characteristics of the business and the risk profile assumed, with reference to the Company consistently with the Company's objectives.

As stated earlier in this Report, the Board of Directors appointed the CEO as the person responsible to set up, maintain and co-ordinate an efficient Internal Control and Risk Management system, and ensure its constant adequacy and efficiency with the support of the Audit and Risk Committee and the Director responsible for Internal Audit. The CEO implements the guidelines approved by the Board of Directors on matters concerning the Internal Control and Risk Management System.

The CEO has the power to request that the Internal Audit function carry out audits on specific areas of operation, and ensure adherence to internal regulations and procedures involving Company transactions and operations; of this, he notifies the Chairman of the Board of Directors, the Chairman of the Audit and Risk Committee and the Chairman of the Board of Statutory Auditors; the CEO reports promptly to the Audit and Risk Committee (or the Board of Directors) any critical issues or problems that emerged during this activity or that he has become aware of, so that the Audit and Risk Committee (or the Board of Directors) may take appropriate action.

The Audit and Risk Committee assists the Board of Directors with consulting and advisory functions, supporting the assessments and decisions of the Board of Directors in carrying out its duties in relation to the Internal Control and Risk Management System, as well as those regarding the approval of the periodic reports of a financial and non-financial nature. At the proposal of its Chairman, the Committee appoints a Secretary, who may or may not be a member.

The Chairman of the Board of Statutory Auditors, or a Statutory Auditor designated by the latter, attends Committee meetings. Other Statutory Auditors may also participate. The Chairman may, from time to time, invite the Director responsible for the Internal Control and Risk Management System, the CFO, and/or other members of the Board of Directors or of Company functions, or third parties, to attend the meetings of the Committee, when their presence may help the Committee improve the performance of its duties.

All information required by the Board of Directors to assess the Internal Control and Risk Management System is reviewed by Saipem's Audit and Risk Committee, which carries out all preparatory activities and reports directly to Saipem's Board of Directors, as part of its periodic reporting, by issuing specific opinions.

All information is also shared through specific meetings, at which the Committee gathers:

  • ≥ information on the Internal Control and Risk Management System related to Saipem processes through periodic meetings with the management and relevant functions of the Company;
  • ≥ periodic reports of the Compliance Committee, including in its capacity as Guarantor of the Code of Ethics;
  • ≥ the results, periodic reports and indicators of Internal Audit activities;
  • ≥ investigations and examinations conducted by third parties regarding the Internal Control and Risk Management System;
  • ≥ the reports pursuant to the Compliance and Governance Models adopted in connection with the applicable laws;
  • ≥ reporting of risks; statements on the adequacy of the regulatory system made by the various process owners; other information required by corporate procedures;
  • ≥ the information made available by the General Counsel, Contract Management, Company Affairs, Governance and Public Affairs, and/or the competent functions, with particular reference to information relating to the monitoring of the legal risk and the risk of non-compliance;
  • ≥ information relating to problems and critical points emerging during the monitoring of the Internal Control and Risk Management System put forward by the Director in charge of the Internal Control and Risk Management System.

In order to guarantee the timely exchange of information for the performance of their respective duties and to facilitate the coordination of business in common areas of concern, the Audit and Risk Committee ensures that a two-way flow of information is established between it and the Board of Statutory Auditors, thereby ensuring that the Company's transactions are conducted in an orderly fashion.

The Audit and Risk Committee reports to the Board of Directors, at least upon the approval of the Annual and Half-Year interim report, regarding the work performed and the adequacy (even in the form of negative assurance) of the Internal Control and Risk Management System.

The Internal Audit function carries out independent and objective assurance and consulting activities aimed at improving Saipem's efficiency and effectiveness. The Internal Audit Function supports the Company's functions and management and control bodies in accomplishing their objectives by providing a systematic, disciplined and value-adding approach in order to evaluate and improve the effectiveness of risk management, control and governance processes.

The main duties of the Internal Audit function include the assignment of duties to and the administrative management of relations with the external auditors, notwithstanding the responsibilities of the Board of Statutory Auditors in their capacity as the Committee for Internal Control and Legal Audit. It ensures that information is shared with the Compliance Committee, the Audit and Risk Committee and the Board of Statutory Auditors. The Audit and Risk Committee supervises the operations of the Internal Audit function and those of the Head of the Internal Audit function so that these are carried out under conditions of independence, due objectivity, competence and professional diligence, in compliance with the Company's Code of Ethics; however, the Head of the Internal Audit Function reports hierarchically to the Board of Directors and, on its behalf, to its Chairman, and the management of the functional relationship with the Head of Internal Audit is the responsibility of the Head of the Internal Control and Risk Management System.

Directors' and Statutory Auditors' interests and transactions with related parties

In order to implement Article 2391-bis of the Italian Civil Code, Consob approved a Regulation on March 12, 2010 which obliged listed companies to adopt procedures not later than December 1, 2010, aimed at guaranteeing full transparency, as well as procedural and effective fairness for transactions with related parties.

Also in light of the recommendations of the then applicable Corporate Governance Code issued by Borsa Italiana SpA, in 2010, Saipem's Board of Directors had unanimously approved the first edition of the procedure "Interests held by Board Directors and Statutory Auditors and transactions with related parties", effective from January 1, 2011 and which has been updated several times to comply with the evolutions of the regulatory framework, with the favourable opinion from time to time of the Committee responsible for related party transactions (the Audit and Risk Committee carried out the Related Party Committee functions until the appointment by the Board of Directors, on May 18, 2021, of a dedicated Related Parties Committee).

An internal operational procedure had also been issued in 2016 "Transactions involving interests held by Board of Directors and Statutory Auditors and transactions with related parties - role and responsibilities of attorneys", aimed at further regulating activities, roles and responsibilities of all parties involved in the procedure itself. This procedure has been updated from time to time in line with the aforementioned procedure.

On December 11, 2020, Consob published some amendments to the Regulations on transactions with related parties, which came into force on July 1, 2021. Companies have had to adapt their procedures to the new provisions of the Regulation on transactions with related parties as of June 30, 2021.

Saipem promptly took action and, on April 28, 2021 reviewed the Management System Guideline "Transactions involving the interests held by Directors and Statutory Auditors and transactions with related parties" and the Regulations of the Related Parties Committee, in its former composition, to implement the amendments to the Consob Regulations on Related Party Transactions.

On May 18, 2021, pursuant to and for the purposes of Article 4 of Consob Regulation on Related Parties' Transactions (Consob Resolution No. 17221 dated March 12, 2010 and subsequent amendments) and of the Management System Guideline (MSG) "Transactions involving the interests of Directors and Statutory Auditors and transactions with related parties", the Board of Directors resolved to establish the Related Parties Committee composed of at least three non-executive Directors, all of whom are independent.

The Management System Guideline now called "Transactions with related parties and parties of interest" ("Related Parties MSG", last updated by the Board of Directors on September 20, 2022, sets out the principles and rules that Saipem and its subsidiaries must comply with in order to ensure the transparency and substantial and procedural fairness of transactions with related parties or with parties involving the interests of Directors and Statutory Auditors of Saipem, entered into by the Company or its subsidiaries.

The procedure reflects the definitions and provisions of Consob Regulation on Related Parties' Transactions: transactions have been divided into transactions of greater importance, transactions of lesser importance, and exempted transactions, with different procedures and disclosures to be followed, based on the type and relevance of the transactions.

Specifically, the Board of Directors reserves the right to approve transactions of greater importance, subject to the Related Parties Committee being in favour, having been involved in negotiations and having received complete and timely information. For transactions of lesser importance, the Related Parties Committee, expresses a reasoned, albeit not binding, opinion on the interest the Company may have in a transaction and the expedience and substantial fairness of its terms.

The procedure has also identified transactions of very small amounts, which are excluded from the procedure, as well as other types of transactions, which, due to the nature of the revenue and/or cost, are deemed to be regular transactions as they were completed in market-equivalent or standard terms and therefore are excluded from the procedure even if they are not of small amounts.

This procedure attributes a major role to independent Directors, as members of the Related Parties Committee. In terms of the duty of information to the public, Saipem's procedure fully reflects the provisions of Consob Regulation on Related Parties' Transactions.

The procedure envisages a specific discipline regulating transactions in which a Board Director or Statutory Auditor may hold an interest, on their own behalf or on behalf of a third party; the procedure details the checks and evaluations required in the preparatory and approval stages, as well as the reasons for the transactions involving a vested interest by a Director or a Statutory Auditor, notwithstanding the requirement of a reasoned opinion issued by the Related Parties Committee when a transaction requires approval by the Board of Directors.

The Related Parties MSG establishes a flow of information from the management to the Related Parties Committee and then to the Board of Directors, involving all the transactions carried out with parties of interest as defined by current legislation, with particular reference to transactions qualified by the investigating attorney as having been concluded – or to be concluded – on ordinary terms and conditions and equivalent to market or standard terms and conditions.

The procedure defines timeframes, responsibilities and verification tools by the interested parties, in addition to the flows of information required for the correct application of the regulations.

The Internal Audit Function carries out annual spot checks on the regular application of the Related Parties MSG by the attorneys and the regular application of exclusions.

Board Directors, Statutory Auditors, General Managers and Senior Managers with strategic responsibilities declare every six months all transactions they may have entered into involving Saipem and/or its subsidiaries, either directly or through a third party. They also declare potential significant relations for the purposes of the identification of related parties (for example, close relatives).

Board Directors and Statutory Auditors declare, every six months, or sooner in the event of changes, any potential interests they may hold in the Company and the Group.

Amounts of transactions of a commercial, financial or other nature with related parties, a description of the most relevant types of transaction, their incidence on the balance sheet, income statement and financial flows are detailed in the consolidated and statutory financial statements of Saipem.

In 2022, the CEO-General Manager in office until August 31, 2022 and the CEO-General Manager in office from August 31, 2022 provided periodical updates to the Board of Directors and the Board of Statutory Auditors of transactions entered into with related parties.

The Related Parties MSG is available on Saipem's website at www.saipem.com (section "Governance").

Related Parties Committee

Until the Board of Directors' meeting of May 18, 2021, the Related Parties Committee was comprised, in addition to two independent and non-related members of the Audit and Risk Committee, of another non-related and independent Director.

Following a resolution by the Board at the above meeting, pursuant to and for the purposes of Article 4 of the Consob Regulation on Related Parties' Transactions (Consob Resolution 17221 dated March 12, 2010 and subsequent amendments) and the Related Parties MSG, a dedicated Related Parties Committee was set up, comprising of at least three non-executive Directors, all independent.

The Committee performs the functions set forth by the current legislation on related parties' Transactions and by the Related Parties MSG. Specifically the Committee: (i) examines and gives its opinion on the adoption of rules for transparency and substantial and procedural correctness of transactions with related parties carried out by the Company and its subsidiaries and of those in which a Director has a direct or indirect interest, in order to ensure the principles of transparency and substantial and procedural correctness; (ii) provides, where required, prior and reasoned opinions on transactions of lesser and greater importance, which do not fall within the cases of exemption, vis-à-vis the interest of Saipem SpA – as well as the relevant directly and/or indirectly controlled companies that may be involved – in carrying out the transactions themselves, as well as on the expediency and substantial correctness of their conditions; (iii) verifies the correct application of the conditions for the exemption for transactions of greater importance defined as ordinary and carried out at market or standard conditions. The Committee receives information on the application of cases of exemption in accordance with the methods and timeframes set forth in the Related Parties MSG; (iv) fulfils any additional responsibilities under the current relevant legislation on matters of transactions with related parties.

The Regulations of the Related Parties Committee, approved by Saipem Board of Directors at their meeting of June 30, 2021, is published on the Company's website (under the section "Governance" - Related Parties Committee).

With regard to the provisions of the applicable legislation on transactions with related parties, in 2022, the Committee met a total of 9 times, with an average duration of 0.52 hours and an average participation of 92.59% of its members.

In 2023, as of March 14, 2023, the Committee has already held 1 meeting.

Board of Statutory Auditors

Composition, appointment and functions of the Board of Statutory Auditors

The Board of Statutory Auditors, pursuant to Article 149 of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998, monitors:

  • ≥ compliance with the law and the Articles of Association;
  • ≥ that management principles are correctly adhered to;
  • ≥ the adequacy of the Company organisational structure, the internal control system and the administrative/accounting system, and the reliability of the latter to clearly reflect the Company's position; the implementation of corporate governance regulations contained in the Codes of Practice issued by Stock Exchange management companies and/or professional associations, which the Company has made a public declaration to adhere to;
  • ≥ the adequacy of directions given by the Company to its subsidiaries.

The Board of Statutory Auditors, in its capacity as the Committee for Internal Audit and the Audit of accounts, carries out the duties provided in Article 19 of Legislative Decree No. 39/2010. Pursuant to the latter, as amended by Legislative Decree No. 135/2016, the Board of Statutory Auditors submits a documented proposal to the Shareholders' Meeting, concerning the granting of auditing responsibilities, as well as remuneration for the external auditors, and, in case of revocation of the external auditors' mandate by the Shareholders' Meeting, must be consulted in advance.

Whenever a Statutory Auditor has a vested interest, on their own behalf or on behalf of a third party, in a certain transaction entered into by the Issuer, they shall promptly inform the other Statutory Auditors and the Chairman of the Board of Directors detailing the nature, terms, origin and size of their interests. As part of their remit, Statutory Auditors may ask the Internal Audit function to audit specific areas of business and/or Company operations. The Board of Statutory Auditors and the Audit and Risk Committee can rely on a timely and prompt exchange of information they deem relevant in the fulfilment of their duties.

On February 25, 2020, Saipem's then Board of Directors had adopted, after a review by the Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance Committee, the statutory changes necessary to ensure compliance with the most recent legislation on gender balance provided for by Law No. 160 dated December 27, 2019.

The Board of Statutory Auditors, appointed by the Shareholders' Meeting on April 29, 2020 in compliance with the legislation on gender balance currently in force, is comprised of three Statutory Auditors and two Alternates. The Statutory Auditors' mandate lasts three years, expiring at the Shareholders' Meeting called to approve the financial statements at December 31, 2022.

The Statutory Auditors perform their office with total autonomy and independence, even from the shareholders who elected them. With regard to the remuneration of the Board of Statutory Auditors, the Shareholders' Meeting, at the time of their appointment and at the joint proposal of the shareholders Eni SpA and CDP Industria SpA (now CDP Equity SpA), to maintain the current remuneration, setting the annual gross remuneration of the Chairman of the Board of Statutory Auditors and of all Statutory Auditors at €70,000 and €50,000 respectively, plus reimbursement of expenses.

Pursuant to Article 27 of the Articles of Association, Statutory Auditors are appointed from voting lists; one Statutory Auditor and one Alternate Auditor are appointed from the list put forward by the minority shareholders. The filing, presentation and publication of lists are governed by Article 19 of Articles of Association and Consob regulations vis-à-vis appointments of management and control bodies, the same regulations governing the appointment of members of the Board of Directors.

Lists are structured in two sections: the first comprises candidates for the office of Statutory Auditor, the second candidates for the office of Alternate Auditor. Lists that, considering both sections, present three or more candidates for the appointment of the majority of members to the Board of Statutory Auditors, must include, in the list of Statutory Auditors, candidates of both genders in order to comply with current gender balance legislation. Should the Alternate Auditors' section feature two candidates, these will have to be of different genders.

Two Statutory Auditors and one Alternate Auditor are selected from the list which receives the majority of votes. The remaining Statutory Auditor and Alternate Auditor are selected by allocating each candidate a ratio, obtained by dividing the votes received by each list by the progressive number of Statutory Auditors still to be appointed. In the event that more than one candidate obtains the same ratio, the candidate on the list with no Auditors yet appointed or on the list with the lowest number of Auditors appointed will be elected. If these lists have yet to elect a Statutory Auditor, or if they have already appointed an equal number of Auditors, the candidate on the list with the highest number of votes will be appointed. In the case of another tie, the Shareholders' Meeting will vote again, but only amongst the candidates under ballot, and the candidate who receives the majority of votes will be elected.

The Shareholders' Meeting appoints the Chairman of the Board of Statutory Auditors from the list put forward by the minority shareholders.

Should the procedure for the appointment of Statutory Auditors fail to meet the requirements of regulations on gender balance, the ratio of votes is calculated for each candidate taken from the Statutory Auditors sections of the various lists, by dividing the votes received by each list by the order number of each candidate. The candidate of the most represented gender with the lowest ratio amongst candidates from all lists is replaced, by the candidate from the least represented gender with the higher order number in the same Statutory Auditors section of the list of the replaced candidate, or in the Alternate Auditors section of the same list of the replaced candidate (in this case, the latter replaces as Alternate Auditor who took their place). If by doing so the gender balance legislation is still not met, the candidate is replaced by a person appointed by the Shareholders' Meeting through a majority vote as required by law, so as to ensure that the composition of the Board of Statutory Auditors is compliant with the law and the Articles of Association. If candidates from different lists obtained the same ratio, the candidate from the list which has appointed the greater number of Statutory Auditors is replaced, or the candidate from the list that obtained the fewest votes, or, if votes are equal, the candidate who obtains the fewest votes by the Shareholders' Meeting in an ad-hoc ballot.

If, for any reason, Statutory Auditors cannot be appointed by the aforementioned procedures, the Shareholders' Meeting shall make the appointments through a majority vote as required by law, so as to ensure that the composition of the Board of Statutory Auditors is compliant with the law and the Articles of Association.

In the event of the replacement of an Auditor from the list that has received the majority of votes, the Alternate Auditor from the same list fills the vacant position; in the event of a replacement of an Auditor from other lists, the Alternate Auditor from those lists fills the vacant position. If the replacement fails to meet gender balance requirements, the Shareholders' Meeting must be called promptly to ensure compliance with this legislation.

This voting procedure from lists is only applicable whenever the entire Board of Statutory Auditors is replaced. Pursuant to Article 27 of the Articles of Association, lists may be presented by voting shareholders who, individually or with others, hold voting shares representing at least to 1% of the ordinary share capital, as set forth in Consob's Resolution No. 76 dated January 30, 2023.

Lists enclose declarations by each candidate stating that they meet the integrity and independence requirements (see Article 148, paragraph 3 of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998) provided by law alongside their professional résumé.

The current Board of Statutory Auditors, appointed by the Shareholders' Meeting on April 29, 2020 and whose mandate expires at the Annual General Meeting called to approve the financial statements at December 31, 2022, comprises Giovanni Fiori (Chairman), Giulia De Martino (Statutory Auditor), Norberto Rosini (Statutory Auditor), Maria Francesca Talamonti (Alternate Auditor) and Francesca Michela Maurelli (Alternate Auditor). Giulia De Martino, Norberto Rosini and Maria Francesca Talamonti have been drawn from the list presented jointly by Eni SpA and CDP Industria SpA (now CDP Equity SpA), whose overall holding is equal to 43.095% of Saipem's ordinary share capital, voted by the majority of shareholders at the Annual General Meeting. Giovanni Fiori and Francesca Michela Maurelli have been drawn from the list presented by shareholders, whose overall holding is equal to 1.07188% of Saipem's ordinary share capital, voted by the minority of shareholders at the Annual General Meeting. Giovanni Fiori has been appointed Chairman of the Board of Statutory Auditors by the Shareholders' Meeting, as he has been drawn from the minority list.

The personal and professional résumés of Statutory Auditors are published on www.saipem.com under the section "Governance".

In compliance with the provision of the Corporate Governance Code aimed at ensuring that Statutory Auditors meet the independence requirements following their appointment (a similar provision also applies to Board Directors), the Board of Statutory Auditors assesses annually, through their own declarations, that all of its members meet the independence requirements.

On May 12, 2020, the newly appointed Board of Statutory Auditors had assessed the suitability of members and the adequate composition of the body, vis-à-vis the requirements of professional skills, competence, integrity and independence required by the legislation.

Lastly, on December 2, 2022, the Board of Statutory Auditors verified that all its members still met the requirements of professional skills, competence, integrity and independence required both by the law (Article 148, paragraph 3 of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998) and by the Corporate Governance Code for Statutory Auditors of listed companies, informing the Company so that the results of this assessment could be disclosed to the market in the corporate governance report.

The Statutory Auditors are provided in advance with documents pertaining to items to be discussed and/or resolved at Board meetings.

For this purpose, amongst others, the Board of Statutory Auditors has a Secretary. This role is held by Simone Negri, Head of the "Boards of Statutory Auditors and Independent Auditors Services" function.

The Board of Statutory Auditors ensured the independence of the external auditors, ascertaining that they met all of the legal requirements and evaluating the nature and size of services other than accounting audits they provided to the Company and its subsidiaries directly, or through associated companies.

The Board of Statutory Auditors liaised closely with the Internal Audit function and the Audit and Risk Committee, attending Committee meetings, some of which were also attended by the Director of the Internal Audit function.

The Chairman of the Board of Statutory Auditors, one Statutory Auditor designated by the latter or the whole Board of Statutory Auditors attends the meetings of the Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance Committee, the Related Parties Committee and of the Compensation and Nomination Committee.

Meetings of the Board of Statutory Auditors may be held via video or tele-conference link.

The Board of Statutory Auditors of Saipem SpA in office since April 29, 2020, met 21 times in 2022 with an average meeting duration of 2.09 hours. The meetings were attended by an average of 97% of Statutory Auditors, while the Board of Statutory Auditors attended all meetings of the Board of Directors held in 2022, with an average attendance of 98.81% of Statutory Auditors.

In 2023, as of March 14, 2023, the Board of Statutory Auditors has already met on 2 occasions.

In 2022, the Board of Statutory Auditors carried out audit and control activities relating to the following areas of: (i) compliance with the law and the deed of incorporation; (ii) compliance with the principles of good administration; (iii) adequacy and efficiency of the organisational structure, of the internal accounting system and the administrative/accounting system, the reliability of the latter to provide a fair reflection of business operations, and the general integrity of the financial reporting process; (iv) methods of implementation of corporate governance regulations adopted by the Company; (v) the adequacy of directions given by the Company to its subsidiaries pursuant to Article 114, paragraph 2 of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998; (vi) the implementation of the procedure for the preparation of the "Consolidated Non-Financial Statements", pursuant to Legislative Decree No. 254 dated December 30, 2016.

Based on information received by the management and having carried out their checks, the main activities carried out by the Board of Statutory Auditors in 2022, included:

  • ≥ approval of the Annual Audit Plan;
  • ≥ monitoring of the Integrated Risk Assessment System;
  • ≥ review and evaluation of results of Internal Audit activities;
  • ≥ meetings with the Company's top financial managers, the partner of the external Auditors to review the main items of the annual financial statements and interim reports;
  • ≥ periodic exchange of information with the auditing firm in the areas under their remit;
  • ≥ acknowledging the measures implemented by the Company to comply with Legislative Decree No. 231/2001, paying particular attention to the compliance, training and analysis of sensitive processes, as well as the updating of Model 231 of Saipem SpA (which includes the Code of Ethics) and associated enclosures;
  • ≥ monitoring the preparation, publication, verification and compliance of the "Consolidated Non-Financial Statement" pursuant to Legislative Decree No. 254 dated December 30, 2016 (through Resolution No. 22525 of November 30, 2022, Consob set the parameters envisaged by Article 6 of the regulation adopted with Resolution No. 20267 dated January 18, 2018 to sample check the non-financial statements published in 2022. In executive Resolution No. 75 of January 24, 2023, Consob listed the entities that, from January 1 to December 31 2022, published the non-financial statement relating to the year 2022);
  • ≥ supervising, with the Company's Audit and Risk Committee, Saipem's financial reporting process, for issues under their respective remit;
  • ≥ monitoring the organisational structure and power allocation at the basis of the decision-making process within the Saipem Group;
  • ≥ periodic analysis of notification, even in confidential or anonymous form (whistleblowing), that are received by Saipem, assessing their contents and proposed corrective measures;
  • ≥ monitoring the actual application of the procedure adopted by the Company on Related Parties' Transactions; acquisition of the periodic reports by the Compliance Committees of all subsidiaries;
  • ≥ supervising the updating of the clustering process as detailed previously in the document: a classification model for the subsidiaries, divided into "Clusters", determined based on drivers that take into account both the quantitative size of the individual entity and the qualitative levels of risk it is potentially subject to;
  • ≥ monitoring of ongoing judicial proceedings and the periodic updates provided by the Legal Department at Board meetings;

  • ≥ monitoring of the analysis and updating process of the Strategic Plan for the 2023-2026 period;

  • ≥ monitoring of the decision-making process adopted by the Company:
  • ≥ review of the updated version of the Shareholders' Agreement between the two main shareholders (Eni and CDP Equity SpA, formerly Fondo Strategico Italiano SpA and CDP Industria SpA), last published in January 3, 2023 (see page 17, paragraph "Shareholders's Agreement" of this Report);
  • ≥ supervising the capital increase approved by the Company's Board of Directors on June 22, 2022 under the authority it was granted pursuant to Article 2443 of the Italian Civil Code by the Extraordinary Shareholders' Meeting of May 17, 2022. The capital increase is part of the broader context of Saipem's capital and financial strengthening package, approved by the Company's Board of Directors on March 24, 2022, at the same time as the approval of the updated 2022-2025 Strategic Plan;
  • ≥ supervising the introduction of the new organisational structure updated by Saipem on February 4, 2022, which provided for the establishment of a new general management with extensive operational and management powers; the establishment of a unit aimed at strengthening the planning and financial control of projects and other management activities; the concentration of legal and contractual activities in a corporate function within the new general management; as well as a new management structure that, among other things, saw: on May 20, 2022, the appointment of Mr. Chini as General Counsel - Director of the Legal Affairs and Contract Management and Company Affairs and Corporate Governance Functions; on May 27, 2022, the appointment of Paolo Calcagnini as Chief Financial Officer and Senior Manager responsible for Financial Reporting; on June 28, 2022, the appointment of Maurizio Bonzi as Director of the Internal Audit Function; on August 31, 2022, the appointment of Alessandro Puliti as Chief Executive Officer and General Manager;
  • ≥ providing information to the Board of Directors, on the outcome of the statutory audit of the accounts, accompanied by the additional report, as per Article 11 of the European Regulations, and associated observations. In compliance with Article 19, paragraph 1, letter a) of Legislative Decree No. 39/2010, the Board of Statutory Auditors (as the Internal Control and Audit Committee) informed the administrative body of the results of the statutory audit of the accounts for the 2021 financial year, sending the additional report pursuant to Article 11 of European Regulation 537/2014.

Pursuant to Article 27 of the Articles of Association, Statutory Auditors may hold positions as members of administrative and control bodies at other companies; however, these are limited by Consob's Issuers' Regulations, Article 144-terdecies. In any case, pursuant to the aforementioned regulation, candidates already holding the office of Statutory Auditor at five listed companies may not be appointed as Auditors, and if elected, shall forfeit their office. Based on information received, we list hereafter the other offices (as Board Directors or Statutory Auditor) held by Saipem's Statutory Auditors in other companies.

GIOVANNI FIORI (Chairman) selected from the list put forward by institutional investors

Chairman of the Board of Directors of: Elettra 1938 SpA, FCA SpA, CFI SpA, Sonick SA; Chairman of the Board of Statutory Auditors of Italo SpA; Special Commissioner of: Selta SpA, Alitalia LAI SpA in liquidation, Alitalia Servizi SpA in liquidation, Alitalia Express SpA, Alitalia Airport SpA, Volare SpA, Ilva Pali Dalmine SpA under extraordinary administration, Scala SpA under extraordinary administration, Selfin SpA, Met Sogeda SpA, Met. Fin Sas under extraordinary administration.

GIULIA DE MARTINO (Statutory Auditor) selected from the list put forward jointly by the shareholders Eni SpA and CDP Industria SpA (now CDP Equity SpA)

Board Director of: INPS Servizi SpA, ENAC; Chairman of the Board of Statutory Auditors of: NovaSIM SpA in liquidation, Banca Widiba SpA, Società Italiana Traforo del Monte Bianco SpA; Statutory Auditor of: Erg SpA12, Eni Trading & Shipping SpA, Eni Trade & Biofuels SpA, International Energy Services SpA, Floaters SpA, Servizi Colleferro ScpA; Member of the Supervisory Board of: Credito Cooperativo Interprovinciale Veneto in liquidation, Valore Italia Holding di Partecipazioni SpA, Fondazione MEDOR (Gruppo Leonardo), Ente Ecclesiastico Miulli; Liquidator of Advam Partners SGR SpA in Lca; Alternate Auditor of Enel SpA12.

NORBERTO ROSINI (Statutory Auditor) selected from the list put forward jointly by the shareholders Eni SpA and CDP Industria SpA (now CDP Equity SpA)

Statutory Auditor of: Technologies for Water Services SpA, Rosetti Marino SpA12; Sole Director of Gironofra Re Srl.

MARIA FRANCESCA TALAMONTI (Alternate Auditor) selected from the list put forward jointly by the Shareholders Eni SpA and CDP Industria SpA (now CDP Equity SpA)

Statutory Auditor of: Armonia SGR SpA, Bluwater SpA, Carige REOCO SpA, Digitouch SpAF12, D-Share SpA, iQera Italia SpA, PLC SpA12, PS Parchi SpA, Raffineria di Milazzo ScpA, Raffineria di Gela SpA, Magicland SpA, Sirti Digital Solutions SpA, Sirti Telco Infrastructure SpA.

FRANCESCA MICHELA MAURELLI selected from the list put forward by institutional investors

Chairman of the Board of Statutory Auditors of Autogrill SpA12; Statutory Auditor of Crèdit Agricole Italia SpA12; Board Director of Oxy Capital Italia Srl.

(12) Listed company.

Relations with the shareholders

Access to information

Saipem maintains a constant engagement with shareholders and financial market analysts, ensuring the timely disclosure of comprehensive information on Company activities, and is limited only by the confidentiality requirements afforded to certain information. Information for investors, the market and the media is disseminated via press releases, and periodic meetings with institutional investors, the financial community and journalists, in addition to the comprehensive information made available and constantly updated on the Company website at www.saipem.com.

Relations with investors and financial analysts are maintained by the Head of the Investor Relations function. Information of interest for investors is posted on Saipem's website or can be requested via email from: [email protected].

The Company Affairs and Governance function maintains relations with retail shareholders, for matters under its remit, answering their requests and providing clarification and with all shareholders providing Company documentation also through dedicated IT channels.

Information of interest to investors is posted on Saipem's website at www.saipem.com or can be requested via email from: [email protected].

Furthermore, until 2022, the Public Affairs, Sustainability and Communication function, which was headed by Loretana Cortis, reporting directly to the CEO and General Manager, was responsible for strengthening Saipem's reputation and image towards its stakeholders through the development of relationships, the dissemination of the Saipem brand and its values, as well as the development of a sustainable corporate business model. The Public Affairs, Sustainability and Communication function oversaw at group level: (a) the management of institutional relations, legislative and regulatory affairs; (b) the management of social media and media relations, the image and corporate identity, through the definition and implementation of advertising, promotional, cultural and sponsorship initiatives; (c) the management of corporate marketing activities aimed at promoting Saipem as a whole; (d) the promotion and application of policies, strategies and principles of Saipem's sustainability model; (e) the planning and implementation of sustainability initiatives and disclosure on sustainability performance.

It should be noted that, during the first few months of 2023, the above-mentioned activities underwent a reorganisation that led to a structure in which the aforementioned activities were assigned, in a synergic manner, to different functions. Specifically, external communication, press relations and brand management is entrusted to the specific function "External Communication and Brand Management", which is headed by Rossella Carrara, while the management of institutional relations, legislative and regulatory affairs will be headed by the function "General Counsel, Contract Management, Company Affairs, Governance and Public Affairs", assigned to Mr. Chini, for the purpose of integrating all legal competences. With regard to Sustainability, activities and responsibilities have been reallocated to the "People, HSEQ and Sustainability" function, under the responsibility of Massimiliano Branchi, to maximise operational synergies and use greater leverage for the promotion and implementation of sustainability-related projects.

Shareholders engagement

On February 20, 2022, the Board of Directors of Saipem SpA, at the Chairman's proposal and in agreement with the Chief Executive Officer and General Manager, having consulted the Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance Committee, approved the "Policy for the engagement with shareholders and other interested parties" to manage the engagement with current and potential Saipem shareholders and other interested parties, so as to implement Recommendation No. 3 of the Corporate Governance Code, taking into consideration the engagement policies adopted by institutional investors and asset managers.

Saipem is committed to promoting maximum transparency towards investors and the financial community, through the fostering, maintenance and development of an active relationship of trust with them, which benefits both investors and the Company, with a view to creating value in the medium-long term.

This Policy is available on the Saipem website at www.saipem.com, under the section "Governance".

This Policy governs the traditional Engagement tools, as well as the Engagement between the Board of Directors and the interested parties.

The Policy promotes: (a) the principle of transparency of the information provided in the Engagement, based on which the information provided must be clear, complete, correct, truthful and not misleading; (b) compliance with current laws and regulations, as well as internal governance rules, in particular those relating to the prevention of market abuse and the disclosure of inside information, also ensuring the application of the principles of collaboration and transparency with the supervisory authorities; (c) sustainability as an integral part of the business, aimed at guaranteeing long-term growth and the creation of value through the effective engagement of the stakeholders.

The Policy governs the relations between the Company and the interested parties in relation to the following matters: a) corporate strategy (strategic plan, announced investments, targets, etc.), the internal control and risk management system, also vis-à-vis financial reporting, as well as the definition of the nature and level of risk compatible with the strategic objectives of the Company, also with a view to pursuing sustainable success; (b) capital structure; (c) the operating performance, the financial statements and the periodic financial results, the performance of Saipem shares and other financial instruments issued by the Company; (d) the policy on dividends, buy-back programs; (e) transactions announced, or carried out, by Saipem and its subsidiaries of significant strategic, economic or financial importance, in addition to transactions announced or carried out with related parties; (f) proposals for amendments to the Articles of Association; (g) the corporate governance system, the appointment and composition of the corporate bodies (including internal Board committees), also with reference to their size, professional skills, integrity, independence and/or diversity; (h) various environmental, social and sustainability issues included in the so-called ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) remit, through the involvement of the Public Affairs Sustainability and Communication function; (i) the remuneration policy for Directors and Senior Managers with strategic responsibilities; (j) policies on transparency and corporate communication towards the market, as well as their implementation, extraordinary and/or particularly significant events which have occurred, and which may significantly affect Saipem's prospects and/or its reputation; (k) the adoption of acts falling within the scope of Article 104 of the Consolidated Law on Finance.

The Board of Directors provides direction, supervision and monitoring in the application of this Policy and, generally, in the pursuit of the Engagement. It is promptly informed of the development and significant content of the Engagement with Interested Parties.

The Board of Directors delegates the management of the Engagement with interested parties to the Chief Executive Officer. The Engagement for issues relating to the system and quality of corporate governance, the statutory structures, the appointment processes and the rules on the composition of the corporate bodies (including internal board committees), also in terms of their size and requirements of professional skills, integrity, independence and diversity, the remuneration policies for Directors and the transparency and disclosure to the market ("corporate governance issues"), is entrusted to the CEO in coordination with the Chairman (who avails herself of the support of the Secretary of the Board of Directors).

Concerning transactions with related parties and issues that may highlight a conflict of interest of the Chief Executive Officer, or that the Chief Executive Officer may consider potentially controversial, the Chief Executive Officer can request that the Board of Directors assess the existence of the Company's interest to engage with one or more Interested Parties and provide indications on how to manage the Engagement.

The Chairman ensures, in agreement with the Chief Executive Officer and with the support of the Secretary of the Board, that the Board of Directors is periodically informed on how the Engagement is managed and, in any case, is informed at their next meeting of the development and significant content of Engagement events that have taken place, as well as any requests for Engagement that have been refused.

Saipem maintains constant interaction with its shareholders, potential investors, analysts and all other financial markets operators. In order to provide a full and detailed representation of financial data and strategies, Saipem's top management presents the company results (quarterly, half-yearly and annual results) and strategy to the market through dedicated conference calls.

In particular, Saipem interacts with its shareholders and other interested parties through its website, press releases, the Annual General Shareholders' Meeting, which represents the institutional meeting between the Company and its shareholders and meetings with the financial community, institutional investors and analysts, which are generally scheduled upon the disclosure of the periodic and annual financial reports and are announced to the public well in advance.

The Investor Relations function guarantees a continuous and transparent interaction between the Company and the market, from whom interested parties may request information. The Investor Relations function strives to ensure that a prompt response is provided to all appropriate requests.

The Secretary of the Board of Directors interacts with the interested parties in coordination with the Investor Relator, in particular on corporate governance issues.

The Engagement between the Company and interested parties may take place as provided for in the Policy and can be initiated:

  • a) at the written request of an interested party to the Investor Relations function, specifying at least the topic or topics to be discussed in the Engagement; the reasons why the interested party intends to engage; the Engagement method proposed by the interested party; the individuals who may wish to take part in the Engagement on behalf of the interested party; the Company functions they wish to engage with and the reasons for their Engagement; and the approximate timeframes of the Engagement; or,
  • b) at the initiative of the Company, by organising collective or bilateral meetings with one or more interested parties, in which one or more Directors and/or Executives of the Company may also participate when required, with the support of the relevant business functions.

The Investor Relations function, in coordination with the Secretary of the Board of Directors, monitors the requests for Engagement received from interested parties. The Secretary ensures a timely flow of information to the Chairman and the CEO.

The Chief Executive Officer, in coordination with the Chairman, whenever the engagement concerns Corporate Governance issues, evaluates whether to:

  • a) accept the Engagement request or start the Engagement, putting in place, in case of acceptance or start of Engagement, any consequent activities deemed necessary or appropriate, even deciding to engage in a different way to that proposed by the interested party, or,
  • b) reject the Engagement request, considering the best interests of the Company and on the basis of the evaluation criteria adopted and/or any other relevant circumstances, including cases in which the Engagement request, especially with reference to a Two-way Engagement, concerns Inside information or pending blackout periods.

Should a Director, other than the Chief Executive Officer, receive a request for Engagement or information from investors, they are required to promptly inform the Secretary of the Board of Directors, who will inform the Chief Executive Officer and the Chairman for appropriate action.

To decide whether or not to accept a request for Engagement received from an interested party, or to engage with the latter, and establish the engagement procedures, the Chief Executive Officer, in coordination with the Chairman where the request for dialogue concerns Corporate Governance issues, carries out a case-by-case assessment, in the best interests of the Company, and taking into account the following factors:

  • a) compliance with any relevant legal, regulatory and/or self-regulatory limitations;
  • b) the relevance of the topics with the issues evaluated as possible Engagement subjects;
  • c) the seriousness of the request and the significance of the topics covered by the request;
  • d) the potential interest in the topic to be discussed for a large number of investors or for investors of a certain importance and/or with particular characteristics and/or for the market;
  • e) the foreseeable usefulness of the Engagement, also with a view to creating value in the medium-long term, and taking into account previous Engagement experiences;
  • f) the size, characteristics and type of the investor requesting or receiving the Engagement, and the nature and investment strategy of the same; their conduct in previous interactions with the Company or their voting at Shareholders' Meetings and the approach they are likely to take with respect to the matters to be discussed in the Engagement, also considering their engagement policies;
  • g) the characteristics of activism initiatives implemented by the investor involved in the Engagement with the Company or other issuers, including the types and forms of activism previously adopted by the same investor, as well as any situations of conflict of interest, even if potential.

Whenever the Engagement request is accepted or an Engagement is initiated, the Chief Executive Officer in coordination with the Chairman, if the engagement concerns Corporate Governance issues:

  • i. may refuse Two-Way Engagement requests in favour of a One-Way Engagement (or vice-versa), especially in potentially problematic situations, including cases in which a request for a Two-Way Engagement concerns Inside information or is presented pending a blackout period;
  • ii. defines the specific methods of conducting the Engagement, which may take place bilaterally or collectively;
  • iii. adopts the most appropriate measures to guarantee the confidentiality of Inside information, by also requesting the signing of confidentiality agreements;
  • iv. depending on the modality of the meeting, the topics under discussion and/or the requests received from the interested parties, he may invite the Chairman, and/or other Directors to participate in and support the Engagement, in view of their expertise within the Board (for instance their chairing of a Board Committee), as well as other Company Executives with the most appropriate knowledge and/or relevant competencies in relation to the topic subject of the Engagement. As a general principle, the Directors called to participate in the meetings are not subject to the mandate given by the parties who presented their candidacy and/or voted for their appointment.

The Investor Relations function communicates the decisions that were taken to the interested party who requested the Engagement.

Should the CEO decide to refuse an Engagement request, in agreement with the Chairman where the Engagement request concerns corporate governance issues and with the support of the Secretary, he promptly informs the Board of Directors and then ensures that notification is given to the interested party by the Investor Relations function, indicating the reasons for the refusal.

The Engagement can also be started at the initiative of the Company, by organising One-Way, Two-Way, Collective or Bilateral meetings with one or more interested parties. The requests for Engagement initiated by the Company will be transmitted by the Investor Relations function, in coordination with the Secretary, to the relevant department of the interested party.

During the engagement between the interested parties and the Company, only the topics that have been previously anticipated and agreed upon between the Company and the interested parties can be addressed, unless otherwise assessed by the Chief Executive Officer. In any case, information of a confidential or privileged nature or capable in any way of harming the interests of the Company or the Saipem Group may not be disclosed.

At the end of the Engagement, the Chief Executive Officer and the other Directors who may have taken part in the meeting draw up a brief report with the support of the Investor Relations function and/or other parties identified by them. These reports are shared, if he did not participate in the meeting, with the Chief Executive Officer and are always sent to the Chairman in order to ensure that the information is subsequently and exhaustively shared with Saipem's Board of Directors.

The Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance Committee verifies at least annually the adequacy of the provisions contained in the "Policy for the engagement with shareholders and other interested parties" vis-à-vis the applicable provisions of the Law, the Corporate Governance Code and the relevant best practices, submitting, in agreement with the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer, any proposed amendments or additions to the Board of Directors.

In particular, on January 20, 2023, a collective engagement meeting was held with Assogestioni (in two-way mode), pursuant to the "Protocol for the Investment Managers' Committee operations and the Italian Principles of Stewardship". During the meeting, which was attended by the Company's top management and all Board Directors, the following topics were discussed, inter alia: (i) the Company's situation (including ESG issues), with particular reference to the risk management of contracts and actions taken to verify the actual profitability of existing contracts, the strategic approach adopted in relation to the energy transition; (ii) the Sustainability Plan; (iii) prospects for the strategic development of the sector; (iv) cooperation with customers and other players in the value chain in order to implement efficient solutions to reduce emissions.

Shareholders' Meeting (pursuant to Article 123-bis, paragraph 1, letter l), paragraph 1, letter c), of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998)

The Shareholders' Meeting represents the institutional meeting point of the Company's Board of Directors and its shareholders. At these meetings, shareholders may ask questions pertaining to items on the agenda or the Company's management at large. The information provided shall comply with the provisions applicable to Market Abuse Regulations.

The functions of the ordinary Shareholders' Meeting are regulated by Article 2364 of the Italian Civil Code, with the exception of those matters for which the Board of Directors is responsible, in accordance with Article 20 of the Articles of Association.

The Shareholders' Meeting of January 30, 2001 had approved the shareholders' meetings regulations (posted on Saipem's website www.saipem.com) to ensure smooth and effective meetings proceedings and, specifically, to safeguard every shareholder's right to intervene on items under discussion.

Following the issue of Legislative Decree No. 49 of May 10, 2019, which implements in Italy Directive 2017/828/EU issued by the European Parliament and Council and amended the previous Directive 2007/36/EC in relation to the promotion of the long-term shareholders commitment, for which Member States were required to issue the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with the aforementioned Directive by June 10, 2019, the Company has been monitoring, since 2017, the evolution of the regulatory framework to update the rules and tools necessary to best meet the needs of shareholders.

Legislative Decree No. 49 of May 10, 2019, as stated before, amended the provisions of the Italian Civil Code concerning transactions with related parties, and intervened on Legislative Decree No. 58/1998, modifying the provisions related to the identification of shareholders, the remuneration of Directors and the right to ask questions, introducing a new section on the transparency obligations of institutional investors and proxy advisors, and updating sanctions. Specifically, the Annual General Meeting is called by publishing a notice on the Company's website, in addition to all other methods set forth in Consob Regulations and in compliance with the law and current legislation.

Pursuant to Article 13 of Saipem's Articles of Association, the legitimate attendance at shareholders' meetings and the exercise of voting rights is confirmed by a statement to the Company from the accredited intermediary, in compliance with their accounting records, on behalf of the shareholder entitled to vote.

This statement is based on the intermediary accounting records registered at the end of the seventh trading day prior to the date of the Shareholders' Meeting on first call. Credit and debit records after this deadline shall not be considered for the purpose of legitimising the exercise of voting rights at the Shareholders' Meeting. Statements issued by the intermediaries must reach the Company by the end of the third trading day prior to the Shareholders' Meeting on first call.

Shareholders who, solely or jointly, represent at least one fortieth of the share capital may request, within ten days from publication of the calling of the Shareholders' Meeting, detailing items they wish to be added to the meeting agenda.

Shareholders entitled to vote may delegate others to represent them at the Shareholders' Meeting, pursuant to the law. To do so, they must present a request either in writing, or electronically. The electronic proxy can be filled in on Saipem's website and sent via certified e-mail, under the terms advised in the notice of Shareholders' Meeting and in compliance with current legislation and regulations.

Saipem's Board of Directors, in view of the renewal of the Board and in line with Recommendation 23 of the Corporate Governance Code, on February 24, 2021, subject to the favourable opinion of the Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance Committee, approved "Saipem Board of Directors' Recommendations to shareholders on the quantitative and qualitative composition of the new Board of Directors".

At the Shareholders' Meeting called to approve the Annual Report, the Board of Directors reports on activities that occurred during the year, both through reports in the financial statements, made public prior to the meeting through methods as provided by the law and current regulations, and by answering questions and requests for clarification posed by the shareholders.

At the Shareholders' Meeting, votes are usually cast so as to facilitate the shareholders in exercising their rights and ensure that the voting results are immediately available.

Due to the COVID-19 emergency and in accordance with emergency regulations, further extended until July 31, 2022, on the basis of the provisions of Article 3, paragraph 1 of Decree-Law No. 228 dated December 30, 2021, which states that "The term referred to in Article 106, paragraph 7, of Decree-Law No. 18 dated March 17, 2020, converted, with amendments, by Law No. 27 dated April 24, 2020, concerning the holding of Shareholders' Meetings by companies and entities, is extended until July 31, 2022", the Ordinary and Extraordinary Shareholders' Meeting – as well as the Special Meeting of Savings Shareholders – of May 17, 2022 were held at Saipem's registered office, with the only physical participants being the Notary, in his capacity as Secretary of the Shareholders' Meeting, the Designated Representative, the Chairman of the Board of Statutory Auditors, the Secretary of the Board of Directors, a limited number of Company Secretariat and technical support personnel, while the Board of Directors and Statutory Auditors attended via videoconference link. Shareholders exercised their voting rights only through a specific proxy granted to the Designated Representative (Dario Trevisan) pursuant to Articles 135-novies and 135-undecies of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998.

Since Decree-Law No. 198 of December 29, 2022 extended the deadline established by Decree-Law No. 18/2020 governing the procedures for holding of shareholders' meetings of companies and entities, from July 31, 2022, to July 31, 2023, the Shareholders' Meeting of May 3, 2023 will be held exclusively through the Designated Representative. According to the provisions of Article 135-undecies, of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998, the Company identified for the 2023 General Shareholders' Meeting, the lawyer Dario Trevisan as the Designated Representative, whom the shareholders could confer proxies, free of charge, with voting instructions on all or some of the proposals on the agenda.

With regard to the share performance, please refer to the paragraph "Saipem SpA share performance" in Saipem's Annual Report and check at www.saipem.com, under the section "Investor Relations - shares/share performance".

Saipem Corporate Governance additional practices (pursuant to Article 123-bis, paragraph 2, letter a), second part, of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998)

Again in 2022, the Boards of the main foreign subsidiaries carried out their annual Board review and included the outcome of the same in their respective Audit & Compliance Committee Reports. Furthermore, as already reported, the Board of Directors at their meeting on December 13, 2022, with a view to continuous improvement, approved the review of the process relating to the clustering of Saipem Group subsidiaries (for further information, please refer to page 47, "Organisational Model pursuant to Legislative Decree No. 231/2001 / Compliance Committee"). Notwithstanding the above, the Company has not applied any corporate governance practices other than those provided for by current laws and regulations, and illustrated in this Report.

Events subsequent to year-end

Events that have occurred since the end of 2022 are as follows:

  • ≥ during the first few months of 2023, the responsibilities of external communication, press relations, and brand management were reorganised and assigned, in a synergic manner, to different functions. Specifically, the specific function "External Communication and Brand Management" was placed under the responsibility of Ms. Rossella Carrara, while the management of institutional relations, legislative and regulatory affairs will be assigned to the function "General Counsel, Contract Management, Company Affairs, Governance and Public Affairs", under the responsibility of Mr. Chini. With regard to Sustainability, the function was reallocated to the "People, HSEQ and Sustainability" function, under the responsibility of Massimiliano Branchi;
  • ≥ the Board of Directors on February 27, 2023 approved the Strategic Plan for the years 2023-2026.

Considerations on the letter by the Chairman of the Corporate Governance Committee dated January 25, 2023

In line with the indications of the letter dated January 25, 2023 sent by the Chairman of the Corporate Governance Committee to all Chairmen of Italian listed companies (and for information to the CEOs and the Chairmen of the Board of Statutory Auditors of the same), containing the "2022 Report on the Evolution of Corporate Governance in Listed Companies - 10th Report on the Application of the Corporate Governance Code" (the "2022 Report") and the recommendations for 2023 (the "2023 Recommendations"), the Chairman of Saipem's Board of Directors shared its contents with the Company's Board of Directors and Board of Statutory Auditors.

The aforementioned documents were examined and discussed by the Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance Committee at their meeting of February 21, 2023 and, subsequently, by the Board of Directors at their meeting of March 7, 2023, attended also by the members of the Board of Statutory Auditors. The analysis carried out by the Committee and shared by the Board found a substantial alignment of Saipem's governance with the content of the 2023 Recommendations and, in general, with the Corporate Governance Code. Specifically:

  • regarding the recommendation on "compliance with the Corporate Governance Code": it should be noted that Saipem's governance system is based on the best international practices on the subject and, in particular, on the principles included in the Corporate Governance Code, approved by the Corporate Governance Committee – applicable to companies from January 1, 2021, informing the market through this Report on Corporate Governance and Shareholding Structure 2022 – as well as the applicable provisions included in the regulatory framework issued by the Consob (the Italian Securities and Exchange Commission). In particular, at their meeting of December 17, 2020, the then Board of Directors resolved to adhere to the principles of the Corporate Governance Code, drawing up a plan of actions aimed at ensuring their implementation (see page 20, paragraph "Compliance with the Corporate Governance Code (pursuant to Article 123-bis, paragraph 2, letter a), first part, of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998);
  • regarding the recommendation concerning "information on the application of the code": please refer to Appendix A of the Report on Corporate Governance and Shareholding Structure (from page 66);
  • regarding the recommendation on "engagement with shareholders": as already reported, on February 20, 2022, the Board of Directors, at the Chairman's proposal, in agreement with the Chief Executive Officer and General

Manager, and having consulted the Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance Committee, adopted the Policy for the Management of the Engagement with current and potential Shareholders of Saipem, and other stakeholders, in order to implement Recommendation No. 3 of the Corporate Governance Code, taking into account the engagement policies adopted by institutional investors and asset managers. For further information and with specific reference to the relevant issues covered by the engagement with shareholders, please refer to the paragraph "Shareholders engagement" from page 56;

  • regarding the recommendation relating to "engagement with other relevant stakeholders": in addition to what is indicated in the Policy for the management of the engagement with shareholders, available on Saipem's website at www.saipem.com, under the "Governance" section, please refer to pages 13 et seq., paragraph "Sustainability Model", page 56 et seq., paragraph "Shareholders engagement" and page 106, paragraph "Relations with stakeholders", contained in the Consolidated Non-Financial Statement 2022;
  • regarding the recommendation concerning the "granting of management powers to the Chairman": please note that the Chairman of Saipem's Board of Directors does not hold an executive role: please refer to page 32, paragraph "Chairman of the Board of Directors";
  • regarding the recommendation on "pre-meeting disclosure": it should be noted that Saipem's Board of Directors Rules and Regulations, last approved on February 20, 2022, do not contain generic exemptions to the timely delivery of pre-meeting documentation for confidentiality reasons; in 2022, the deadline for the transmission of board documentation provided for in the Rules and Regulations of the Board of Directors was generally complied (with a further improvement in the second half of the year), with the exception of a few urgent cases relating to extraordinary resolutions, in which the Board was, in any case, guaranteed adequate in-depth examination of the items on the agenda; please refer to page 20 et seq, paragraph "Compliance with the Corporate Governance Code" and page 29 et seq., paragraph "Functioning of the Board of Directors";
  • regarding the recommendation concerning the "participation of managers in Board meetings": in 2022, the following Company functions participated in the Board of Directors' meetings, to report on the specific issues under their respective remits: the Chief Financial Officer, the General Counsel, the Head of People, Safety and Environment, the Head of Internal Audit, the Head of Strategy and M&A, the Head of the Commercial Department, the Head of the Business Integrity Department, the Head of the Finance Department, the Head of the Health, Safety, Environment & Quality Department, as well as the heads of the various business lines (see page 30, section "Board of Directors' induction", page 31, section "The Secretary of the Board", page 29 et seq., section "Functioning of the Board of Directors", page 34 et seq, paragraph "Board of Directors' Committees ", page 38 et seq., paragraph "Compensation and Nomination Committee", page 44 et seq., paragraph "Functions of the Audit and Risk Committee");
  • regarding the recommendation "Recommendations on the optimal composition": Saipem's Board of Directors, in view of the renewal of the Board of Directors itself and in line with the provisions of Recommendation 23 of the Corporate Governance Code, on February 24, 2021, after receiving the favourable opinion of the Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance Committee, approved the document "Saipem Board of Directors' Recommendations to Shareholders on the Quantitative and Qualitative Composition of the New Board of Directors";
  • regarding the recommendation "Criteria for assessing the importance of the relationships that may influence a Director's independence": the Board of Directors on February 23, 2022, at the proposal of the Sustainability, Scenarios and Governance Committee, defined, pursuant to Article 2, Recommendation 7 of the Corporate Governance Code, the circumstances that may compromise, or appear to compromise, the independence of a Director; for further details, please refer to page 32, section "Independent Directors";
  • regarding the recommendation "Transparency of remuneration policies on the weight of variable components": Saipem's Remuneration Policy transparently details the pay mix of the remuneration package of the CEO and Senior Managers with Strategic Responsibilities, indicating the characteristics and weight of fixed and variable components on the overall remuneration. To provide the market and investors with an immediately readable picture, the pay mix is described, in the Section I of the Report on Remuneration Policy and Compensation Paid, as an executive summary and in tables. In the Section II of the Report on Remuneration Policy and Compensation Paid, evidence is given of the fixed and variable compensation paid, in the year of reference, to the CEO and other Senior Managers with Strategic Responsibilities, in a clear table;
  • regarding the recommendation "Long-Term view in remuneration policies": the 2022 Remuneration Policy, with the aim to focus the management's efforts towards the main objective of cash generation and return to financial sustainability of the incentive plans, introduced a Short-Term Variable Incentive Plan for the year 2022, replacing the last allocation of the Short-Term Variable Incentive Plan 2021-2023 and did not provide for Long-Term Variable Incentive Plans. In line with industry best practice at an international level and with the recommendations of the Corporate Governance Code, the Short-Term Variable Incentive Plan 2022 envisages that a significant portion of the incentive (40%) will be deferred for a two-year period and the amount actually paid out will be determined according to the change in the average Saipem share price, in order to promote the alignment of management interests with the objective of creating value for shareholders. On March 14, 2023, at the proposal of the Compensation and Nomination Committee and subject to the favourable opinion of the Board of Statutory Auditors pursuant to Article 2389, paragraph 3, of the Italian Civil Code, the Board of Directors resolved to submit for approval at the Shareholders' Meeting called to approve the 2022 Financial Statements the adoption of the Long-Term Variable Incentive Plan 2023-2025, which provides for the free assignment of Saipem ordinary shares upon the achievement of corporate performance targets;
  • regarding the recommendation "ESG parameters for Directors' remuneration": the 2022 Remuneration Policy confirms Saipem's focus on ESG objectives, some of which have been included both as entry gates and as

performance indicators in the 2022 Short-Term Incentive Plan. These ESG indicators were described in the Report on Remuneration Policy and Compensation Paid, both in discursive and tabular form, indicating their respective weights. In particular, for the purposes of short-term variable remuneration ("Short-Term Variable Incentive Plan 2022"), specific indicators were identified such as: (i) the Injury Frequency Rate Index (TRIFR); (ii) the reduction of GHG emissions in terms of avoided CO2 related to Scope 1 (direct emissions derived from operations) under Saipem direct control and Scope 2 (indirect emissions derived from energy purchases) within the Group perimeter; (iii) training in relation to anti-corruption and 231 issues for personnel at risk.

Tables

Table 1. Shareholding structure

Shares Voting rights Listed Market/not listed Rights and obligations
Ordinary shares 1,995,557,732 1,995,557,732 Computerized Share Trading Market
(Mercato Telematico Azionario Italia
- MTA)
Dividend/entitled
to vote at the
Shareholders' Meeting
Preferred shares - - - -
Shares with multiple voting - - - -
Other types of voting shares - - - -
Savings shares - - - -
Convertible savings shares 1,059 1,059 Computerized Share Trading Market
(Mercato Telematico Azionario Italia
- MTA)
Convertible into ordinary
shares without time restrictions
/ dividend per share €0.03 higher
than ordinary shares
/ dividend per share up to €0.05
higher than ordinary shares
if profits were recorded
/ not entitled to vote at the
Shareholders' Meeting
Other types of non-voting shares - - - -
Other - - - -

Shareholding structure as at December 31, 2022

Other financial instruments

Listed Market
/not listed
Instruments
in circulation
Type of share to be
converted/exercised
Number of share to be
converted/exercised
Convertible bonds - - - -
Warrants - - - -
Relevant shareholdings as at December 31, 2022
------------------------------------------------ -- -- -- -- --
Declarant Direct Shareholder % of ordinary capital % of voting capital
Cassa Depositi e Prestiti SpA CDP Equity SpA 12.82 12.82
Ministry of Economy and Finance Eni SpA 31.19 31.19

Table 2. Structure of the Board of Directors

Board of Directors
Office Members Year
of birth
First
appointment
(1)
In office
since
In office
until
List (put
forward by)
(2)
List
(M/m)
(3) Exec. exec. Indep.
Code
Indep.
under
Non under Leg. Dec.
58/98
Other
offices
held
(4)
Meeting
attendance
(5)
Chairman Silvia Merlo 1968 2021 Apr. 30, 2021 Approv. Fin. Stat. 2023 Shareholders M X X X 1 28/28
CEO• Alessandro Puliti 1963 2022 Aug. 31, 2022 Approv. Fin. Stat. 2023 Coopted X - 4/4
Director Roberto Diacetti 1973 2021 Apr. 30, 2021 Approv. Fin. Stat. 2023 Shareholders m X X X 2 24/28
Director Alessandra Ferone 1970 2020 Apr. 30, 2021 Approv. Fin. Stat. 2023 Shareholders M X 1 26/28
Director Patrizia Michela Giangualano 1959 2021 Apr. 30, 2021 Approv. Fin. Stat. 2023 Shareholders m X X X 2 28/28
Director Davide Manunta 1981 2022 Oct. 26, 2022 Approv. Fin. Stat. 2023 Coopted X 1 3/3
Director Marco Reggiani 1968 2021 Apr. 30, 2021 Approv. Fin. Stat. 2023 Shareholders M X 1 28/28
Director Paul Schapira 1964 2018 Apr. 30, 2021 Approv. Fin. Stat. 2023 Shareholders m X X X 1 28/28
Director Paola Tagliavini 1968 2021 Apr. 30, 2021 Approv. Fin. Stat. 2023 Shareholders M X X X 3 28/28
Directors terminated during the year
Director Francesco Caio 1957 2018 Apr. 30, 2021 Aug. 31, 2022 Shareholders M X - - - - 24/24
Director Pier Francesco Ragni 1971 2021 Apr. 30, 2021 Oct. 26, 2022 Shareholders M - - - - - 24/24
Number of meetings held during the year: 28

Minimum quorum required for the presentation of lists by minority shareholders for election of one or more members (pursuant to Article 147-ter of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998): 1%

• The Director responsible for the Internal Control and Risk Management System.

ª Lead Independent Director (LID).

(1) The first year in which a Director has ever been appointed in the Board of Directors of the Issuer.

(2) The list from which every Director has been selected, either Shareholders or BoD.

(3) "M" denotes the list from which a member has been appointed ("M": majority list; "m": minority list; "Board of Directors": list presented by the Board of Directors).

(4) Other Directorships or Auditor posts held by a Director in other companies listed either in Italy or abroad, and/or in financial, banking, insurance or large companies. Full details of these additional offices are provided inside this Report (based on the information held by the Company as at April 30, 2021).

(5) Participation to meetings of the Board of Directors (out of the total number of meetings held).

Table 3: Structure of the Board Committees

Board of Directors Related Parties
Committee
Audit and Risk
Committee
Compensation and
Nomination Committee
Sustainability, Scenarios
and Governance Committee
Office/Qualification Members (1) (2) (1) (2) (1) (2) (1) (2)
Chairman of the Board of Directors
Non-executive indep. under Code
and Leg. Dec. 58/98 Silvia Merlo 8/8 C
CEO Alessandro Puliti
Non-executive Director - indep.
under Code and Leg. Dec. 58/98
Roberto Diacetti 7/9 M 16/19 M
Non-executive
- non-independent Director
Alessandra Ferone 18/18 M
Non-executive Director - indep.
under Code and Leg. Dec. 58/98
Patrizia Michela Giangualano 9/9 C 8/8 M
Non-executive
- non-independent Director
Davide Manunta 1/1 M
Non-executive
- non-independent Director
Marco Reggiani 8/8 M
Non-executive Director - indep.
under Code and Leg. Dec. 58/98
Paul Schapira 19/19 M 18/18 C
Non-executive Director - indep.
under Code and Leg. Dec. 58/98
Paola Tagliavini 9/9 M 19/19 C 18/18 M
Directors terminated during the year
CEO Francesco Caio
Non-executive
Director - non independent Pier Francesco Ragni 5/5 M
Members who are not Directors
Executive of the Issuer/Other
Meetings held during the year: 9 19 18 8

(1) Participation to meetings of the Board Committees (out of the total number of meetings held).

(2) "C": Chairman; "M": member.

Table 4. Structure of the Board of Statutory Auditors

Board of Statutory Auditors

Office Members Year
of birth
First
appointment
(1)
In office
since
In office
until
List
(M/m)
(2)
Independence
under the Code
Participation
to meetings
of the BoSA
(3)
Other
offices
held
(4)
Chairman Giovanni Fiori 1961 2020 Apr. 29, 2020 Approval
Fin. Stat. 2022
m X 21/21 -
Statutory Auditor Giulia De Martino 1978 2015 Apr. 29, 2020 Approval
Fin. Stat. 2022
M X 21/21 2
Statutory Auditor Norberto Rosini 1959 2020 Apr. 29, 2020 Approval
Fin. Stat. 2022
M X 19/21 -
Alternate Auditor Maria Francesca
Talamonti
1978 2015 Apr. 29, 2020 Approval
Fin. Stat. 2022
M X - 5
Alternate Auditor Francesca Michela
Maurelli
1971 2017 Apr. 29, 2020 Approval
Fin. Stat. 2022
m X - 3
Statutory Auditors terminated during the year

Number of meetings held during the year: 21

Minimum quorum required for the presentation of lists by minority shareholders for election of one or more members (pursuant to Article 148 of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998): 1%

(1) The first year in which a Statutory Auditor has ever been appointed in the Board of Statutory Auditors of the issuer.

(2) "M" denotes the list from which a member has been appointed ("M": majority list; "m": minority list).

(3) Statutory Auditors' attendance to meetings of the Board of Statutory Auditors (attendance/number of meetings held during the period of office).

(4) Other Directorships or Auditor posts held by a Statutory Auditor pursuant to Article 148-bis of Legislative Decree No. 58/1998 and the regulations included in Consob's Issuer Regulations. Full details of these additional offices are provided by Consob on their website pursuant to Article 144-quinquiesdecies of Consob's Issuer Regulations.

APPENDIX A

2020 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE CODE Applied Not applied or
not applicable
Reference
page
Article 1 - Role of the board of directors
Principles
I.
The board of directors leads the Company by pursuing its
Page 21
"Board of Directors' role"
sustainable success.
II.
The board of directors defines the strategies of the
Company and the Group it heads in accordance with
principle I and monitors its implementation.
Page 21
"Board of Directors' role"
The board of directors defines the corporate governance
III.
system that is most functional for carrying out the
company's business and pursuing its strategies, taking into
account the flexibility offered by the legal framework. If
necessary, the board of directors evaluates and promotes
the appropriate changes and submit them to the
shareholders' meeting when such changes are necessarily
subject to the shareholders' vote.
Page 21
"Board of Directors' role"
IV.
The board of directors promotes dialogue with shareholders
and other stakeholders which are relevant for the Company,
Page 56
"Relations
in the most appropriate way. with shareholders
Recommendations
1. The board of directors:
a) reviews and approves the business plan of the Company and
the Group it heads, also on the basis of matters that are
relevant for the long-term value generation. That analysis is
carried out with the possible support of a committee whose
composition and functions are defined by the board of
directors;
Page 21
"Board of Directors' role"
b) periodically monitors the implementation of the business
plan and assesses the general course of the business,
comparing the results achieved with those planned;
c) defines the nature and level of risk compatible with the
Company's strategic objectives, including all the elements
that can be relevant for the Company's sustainable success;
d) defines the corporate governance system of the Company
Page 35
"Additional committees
(other than those provided
for by the legislation or
recommended by the Code)"
and the structure of the Group it heads, and assesses the
adequacy of the Company's organisational, administrative
and accounting structure and of its strategically important
subsidiaries, with particular reference to the Internal
Control and Risk Management System;
e) approves transactions of the Company and its subsidiaries
Page 40
"Internal Control and Risk
Management System"
that have a significant impact on the Company's strategies,
profitability, assets and liabilities or financial position; to this
end, it establishes the general criteria for identifying
significant transactions;
f) on proposal of the chair in agreement with the Chief
Executive Officer, adopts a procedure for the internal and
external management of documents and information
Page 50
"Directors
and Statutory Auditors'
interests and transactions
with related parties"
concerning the Company, with particular reference to inside
information, in order to ensure the correct management of
corporate information.
2. If deemed necessary for the effectiveness of the Company's
corporate governance system, the board of directors develops
specific proposals to be submitted to the shareholders' meeting
on the following issues:
a) choice and characteristics of the corporate model
(traditional, "one-tier", "two-tier");
b) size, composition and appointment of the board of directors
and term of office of its members;
c) structure of the shares' administrative and property rights;
d) percentages
established
for
the
exercise
of
the
prerogatives set up to safeguard minority shareholders.
In particular, if the board of directors intends to propose to
the shareholders' meeting the introduction of increased
voting rights (so-called "voto maggiorato"), it provides
adequate reasons in the report that will be submitted to the
shareholders prior to their annual meeting. The report
Page 21
"Board of Directors' role"

\ 66

and control structure and its future strategies. In the same
report, the board discloses the decision-making process
followed for the definition of such a proposal and any
dissenting opinions voiced within the board.
3. Upon proposal of the chair in agreement with the Chief
Executive Officer, the board of directors adopts and describes
in the corporate governance report a policy for managing
dialogue with the generality of shareholders, taking also into
account the engagement policies adopted by institutional
investors and asset managers.
The Chairman ensures that the board of directors is in any case
informed, within the first suitable meeting of the development
and the significant contents of the dialogue that has taken place
with all the shareholders.
Page 56
"Relations with
shareholders"
Article 2 - Composition of the corporate bodies
Principles
V.
The board of directors is comprised of executive and
non-executive directors. All directors ensure professional
skills and competence that are appropriate to their tasks.
Page 26
"Composition"
VI.
The number and skills of non-executive directors ensure
significant influence in the decision-making process of the
board
and
guarantee
an
effective
monitoring
of
management. A significant number of non-executive
directors is independent.
Page 32
"Independent Directors"
VII.
The Company applies diversity criteria, including gender
ones, to the composition of the board of directors, ensuring
the primary objective of adequate competence and
professionalism of its members.
Page 27
"Criteria and policies
on diversity"
VIII.
The control body's composition is appropriate for ensuring
the independence and professionalism of its function.
Page 32
"Independent Directors"
Recommendations
4. The board of directors defines the delegation of managerial
powers and identifies who among the executive directors holds
the position of Chief Executive Officer. If the chair is entrusted
with the position of chief executive officer or with significant
managerial powers, the board of directors explains the reasons
for this choice.
Page 31
"Executive Directors"
5. The number and skills of independent directors are appropriate
to the needs of the company and to the well-functioning of the
board of directors, as well as to the establishment of board
committees.
The board of directors includes at least two independent
directors, other than the Chairman.
In large companies with concentrated ownership, independent
directors account for at least one third of the board. In other
large companies, independent directors account for at least
half of the board.
In large companies, independent directors meet, in the absence
of the other directors, on a periodic basis and at least once a
year to evaluate the issues deemed of interest to the
functioning of the board of directors and to the corporate
management.
Page 32
"Independent Directors"
6. The board of directors assesses the independence of each
non-executive director immediately after his or her
appointment. The assessment is renewed during the mandate
upon the occurrence of circumstances that concern his or her
independence and at least once a year.
Each non-executive director provides all the elements
necessary or useful for the assessment of the board of
directors. On the basis of all the information available, the
board considers any circumstance that affects or could affect
the independence of the director.
Page 32
"Independent Directors"
7. The circumstances that jeopardise, or appear to jeopardise, the
independence of a director are at least the following:
a) if he or she is a significant shareholder of the Company;
b) if he or she is, or was in the previous three financial years,
an executive director or an employee:

of the Company, of its subsidiary having strategic
relevance or of a company subject to joint control;

of a significant shareholder of the company;
  • c) if he or she has, or had in the previous three financial years, a significant commercial, financial or professional relationship, directly or indirectly (for example through subsidiaries, or through companies of which he or she is an executive director, or as a partner of a professional or a consulting firm):
  • ≥ with the Company or its subsidiaries, or with their executive directors or top management;
  • ≥ with a subject who, also together with others through a shareholders' agreement, controls the Company; or, if the control is held by a company or another entity, with its executive directors or top management;
  • d) if he or she receives, or received in the previous three financial years, from the company, one of its subsidiaries or the parent company, significant remuneration other than the fixed remuneration for the position held within the board and for the membership in the committees recommended by the Code or required by law;
  • e) if he or she has served on the board for more than nine years, even if not consecutive, of the last twelve years;
  • f) if he or she holds the position of executive director in another company whereby an executive director of the company holds the office of director;
  • g) if he or she is a shareholder, quota-holder or director of a company or other legal entity belonging to the network of the external auditor of the Company;
  • h) if he or she is a close relative of a person who is in any of the circumstances set forth in previous letters.

The board of directors defines ex ante, at least at the beginning of its mandate, the quantitative and qualitative criteria for assessing the significance of the situations set forth above in letters c) and d). If the director is also a partner in a professional or a consulting firm, the board of directors assesses the significance of the professional relationships that may have an effect on his or her position and role within the professional or the consulting firm and in any event those pertaining to important transactions of the Company and the Group it heads, even regardless of the quantitative parameters.

The chair of the board of directors, who has been nominated for such role according to recommendation 23, can be assessed as independent if none of the circumstances set forth above occurs. If the independent chair is member of the board committees recommended by the Code, such committees are made up in majority of independent directors, other than the chair. The independent chair of the board of directors cannot chair the remuneration committee and the Audit and Risk Committee.

  1. The Company defines the diversity criteria for the composition of the board of directors and the control body and identifies the most suitable tool for their implementation, taking into account its ownership structures.

At least a third of the board of directors and the control body, where the latter is autonomous, is to be comprised of members of the less represented gender.

Companies adopt measures to promote equal treatment and opportunities among genders within the entire organisation, monitoring their specific implementation.

    1. All members of the control body meet the independence requirements set out in recommendation 7 for directors. The independence assessment is carried out, with the timing and manner provided for by recommendation 6, by the board of directors or by the control body; such an assessment is based on the information provided by each member of the control body.
    1. The outcome of the assessments of independence of directors and members of the control body referred to in recommendations 6 and 9 is disclosed to the market immediately after the appointment through a specific press release and, later, in the corporate governance report. In both cases, the outcome of the assessment provides information about: the criteria used for the assessment of the significance of the relationships and, in case of any deviation from the circumstances set forth in recommendation 7, a

Page 32 "Independent Directors"

Page 52 "Composition, appointment and functions of the Board of Statutory Auditors"

Page 27 "Criteria and policies on diversity"

Page 32 "Independent Directors"

Page 52 "Composition, appointment and functions of the Board of Statutory Auditors"

clear and detailed reason for this choice motivated by the individual situation and characteristics of the director

concerned.
Article 3 - Functioning of the board of directors and the role
of the chair Page 29
Principles "Functioning of the Board
IX.
The board of directors defines the rules and procedures for
of Directors"
its functioning, ensuring an efficient flow of information to
directors.
X.
The chair of the board of directors plays a liaison role
Page 29
between executive and non-executive directors and "Functioning of the Board
ensures the effective functioning of the board. of Directors"
XI.
The board of directors ensures an adequate division of its
Page 34
functions
and
establishes
board
committees
with
"Board of Directors'
preliminary, propositional and consultative functions. Committees"
Each director ensures adequate time commitment for the
XII.
Page 28
fulfilment of their board responsibilities. "Maximum number of offices
held at other companies"
Recommendations
11. The board of directors develops internal rules that define the
functioning of the board and its committees, including the
means for recording the minutes of the meetings and the
procedures for providing information to directors. These
procedures identify the prior notice for the submission of the Page 29
documentation, ensuring that confidentiality issues are "Functioning
properly managed without affecting the timeliness and of the Board
completeness of the flow of information. of Directors"
The corporate governance report provides adequate
information on the main contents of the board of directors
internal rules and on compliance with the procedures aimed
at ensuring the timeliness and adequacy of the information
provided to the directors.
12. The Chairman of the board of directors, with the help of the
board secretary, ensures that:
a) the pre-meeting information and the complementary
information provided during the meeting are suitable to
allow directors to act in an informed manner; Page 29
b) the activity of the board committees with preliminary, "Functioning of the Board
propositional and consultative functions is coordinated of Directors"
with the activity of the board of directors;
c) in agreement with the Chief Executive Officer, the
managers of the Company and those of the companies of Page 30
the Group it heads, who are competent on the issues "Role of the Chairman
concerned, participate in the relevant board meetings to of the Board of Directors"
provide appropriate insights on the items on the agenda,
also upon request of one or more directors;
d) all the members of the board of directors and control body Page 30
can take part, after the appointment and during the "Board of Directors'
mandate, in initiatives aimed at providing them with induction"
adequate knowledge of the industry in which the Company
operates, the company dynamics and their evolution, also
in relation to the Company's sustainable success. Such Page 36
initiatives also cover the risk management issues, as well "Board review"
as any relevant part of the regulatory and self-regulatory
framework;
e) to provide for the adequacy and transparency of the board
review, with the support of the nomination committee.
13. The board of directors appoints an independent director as
lead independent director:
a) if the chair of the board of directors is the Chief Executive
Officer or holds significant managerial powers; The appointment Page 33
b) if the office of chair is held by the person who controls, of the LID has not been "Lead Independent Director"
also jointly, the Company; requested by the
c) in large companies, even in the absence of the conditions independent Directors
indicated in letter a) and b), if requested by the majority of
independent directors.
14. The lead independent director:
a) collects and coordinates the requests and contributions of The appointment Page 33
non-executive directors and, in particular, of independent of the LID has not been "Lead Independent Director"
ones; requested by the
b) coordinates the meetings of the independent directors. independent Directors
    1. In large companies, the board of directors expresses its guidelines on the maximum number of offices that can be considered compatible with an effective performance and the time commitment required by the role of the directors. The relevant offices are those held in corporate bodies of other listed companies and of companies having a significant size.
    1. The board of directors sets up internal committees with preliminary, propositional and consultative functions regarding appointments, remuneration and control and risks. These functions can be either assigned to the three board committees recommended by the Code or distributed in a different manner or even combined in a single committee. In any case, the Company ensures an adequate disclosure on the tasks and activities carried out by each of the assigned functions, as well as an adequate composition of each committee.

The functions of one or more committees can even be assigned to the board of directors, under the coordination of the chair, provided that:

  • a) independent directors represent at least half of the board;
  • b) the board dedicates adequate sessions to the performance of such functions.

In the event that the functions of the remuneration committee are assigned to the board of directors, the last paragraph of recommendation 26 applies.

Companies other than large ones may assign the functions of the Audit and Risk Committee to the board of directors even in absence of the condition set forth above in letter a).

Companies with concentrated ownership, even large ones, can assign the functions of the nomination committee to the board of directors even in absence of the condition set forth above in letter a).

  1. The board of directors defines the tasks of the committees and their composition, favouring the competence and experience of their members and avoiding, in large companies, an excessive concentration of offices.

Each committee is coordinated by a chair who informs the board of directors about the committee's activities at the first useful board meeting.

The Chairman of the committee may invite the chair of the board of directors, the Chief Executive Officer, the other directors and, by informing the Chief Executive Officer, the managers of the corporate functions that are competent on the matters of the committee meeting, to individual committee's meetings.

The members of the control body can attend the meetings of each committee. Board committees can have access to the information and the corporate functions that are necessary for the performance of their duties.

Board committees have adequate financial resources and can avail themselves of external consultants according to the conditions set forth by the board of directors.

  1. The board of directors, upon proposal of the Chairman, provides for the appointment and dismissal of the board secretary and defines his or her professional requirements and attributes in the board's internal rules.

The board secretary supports the activities of the Chairman and provides impartial assistance and advice to the board of directors on all aspects relevant to the proper functioning of the corporate governance system.

Article 4 - Appointment of directors and board evaluation Principles

  • XIII. The board of directors ensures, within its competence, that the process of appointment and succession of directors is transparent and functional to achieve the optimal composition of the board according to the principles set forth in Article 2.
  • XIV. The board of directors periodically evaluates, through formalised procedures, its effectiveness and the contribution made by individual directors. The implementation of the board evaluation procedures is supervised by the board itself.

√√√√√√ Page 28 "Maximum number of offices held at other companies" Page 34 "Board of Directors' Committees" Page 34 "Board of Directors' Committees" Page 31 "The Secretary of the Board"

Page 24 "Appointment and replacement"

Page 36 "Board review"

\ 70

Recommendations 19. The board of directors entrusts the nomination committee to support it on: a) the evaluation of the board and its committees; b) the definition of the optimal composition of the board and its committees; c) the identification of candidates in case of the director's co-optation; d) the possible submission of a slate by the outgoing board, ensuring the transparency of the process that led to the slate's structure and proposition; e) the development, updating and implementation of succession plan for the Chief Executive Officer and the other executive directors. 20. The majority of directors of the nomination committee are independent. 21. The board evaluation assesses the size, composition and functioning of the board and its committees. It includes also the board's active involvement in the definition of the Company's strategy and in the monitoring of the management of the Company's business, as well as the appropriateness of the Internal Control and Risk Management System. 22. The board evaluation is conducted at least every three years, before the renewal of the board of directors. In large companies other than those with concentrated ownership, the board evaluation is conducted on an annual basis and can be diversified according to the term of the board's mandate. In such companies, the board considers whether to appoint an external facilitator for its evaluation at least once every three years. 23. In companies other than those with concentrated ownership, the board of directors: ≥ sets forth guidelines on board composition deemed optimal before its renewal, considering the outcome of the board evaluation; ≥ requires anyone submitting a slate with a number of candidates that is higher than half the number of members to be elected to provide adequate information on the compliance of the slate with the board guidelines mentioned above, and with the board diversity criteria set forth in principle VII and recommendation 8. In such cases, the slate also identifies its candidate for the chairmanship of the board, whose appointment is conducted according to the company's bylaws. All the information mentioned in this paragraph are disclosed in the documentation attached to the slate during its filing process. The board guidelines are published on the Company's website before the publication of the notice of the shareholders' meeting convened for the board's renewal. They identify the managerial and professional profiles and the skills deemed necessary, having due consideration of the Company's sectoral characteristics, the board diversity criteria set forth in principle VII and recommendation 8, as well as the board guidelines on the maximum number of offices set forth in recommendation 15. 24. In large companies, the board of directors: ≥ elaborates, with the support of the nomination committee, a plan for the succession of the Chief Executive Officer and executive directors by identifying, at least, the procedures to be followed in the event of an early termination of office; ≥ ascertains the existence of appropriate procedures for the succession of the top management. √ √ √ √ √ Taking into account the current organisational structure and the Shareholders' Agreement Eni SpA -CDP Industria SpA (now CDP Equity SpA), which provides for the joint appointment by the two shareholders of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chairman, the Board of Directors of Page 38 "Compensation and Nomination Committee" Page 36 "Board review" Page 37 "Succession plans" Page 38 "Compensation and Nomination Committee" Page 36 "Board review" Page 36 "Board review" Page 26 "Composition" Page 37 "Succession plans" X

Saipem has not provided for succession plans for executive Directors.

Article 5 - Remuneration

Principles
XV. The remuneration policy for directors, members of the
control body and the top management contributes to the
pursuit of the Company's sustainable success and takes into
account the need to have, retain and motivate people with
the competence and professionalism deemed adequate for
their role.
Page 39
"Directors' compensation"
XVI. The remuneration policy is developed by the board of
directors through a transparent procedure.
Page 21
"Board of Directors'
role"
XVII. The board of directors ensures that the remuneration paid
and accrued is consistent with the principles and criteria
defined in the policy, considering the results achieved and
any other circumstances relevant for its implementation.
Page 21
"Board of Directors'
role"
Recommendations
25. The board of directors entrusts the remuneration committee
with the task of:
a) supporting it in the development of the remuneration policy;
b) submitting proposals or expressing opinions on the
remuneration of executive directors and other directors
who hold specific responsibilities, as well as on the setting
of performance objectives related to the variable
component of this remuneration;
c) monitoring the actual application of the remuneration
policy and verifying the effective achievement of the
performance objectives;
d) periodically
assessing
the
adequacy
and
overall
consistency of the remuneration policy for directors and
the top management.
In order to have people with adequate competence and
professionalism, the remuneration of executive and
non-executive directors and of the members of the control
body is defined with due consideration of the remuneration
practices that are common with regards to the company's
reference sectors and size. It also considers comparable
international practices, with the possible support of an
independent consultant.
Page 38
"Compensation and
Nomination Committee"
26. The Remuneration Committee is made up of non-executive
directors, the majority of whom are independent, and is
chaired by an independent director. At least one member of
the Committee has adequate knowledge and experience in
financial matters or remuneration policies; such skills are
assessed by the board of directors before his or her
appointment.
No director takes part in the meetings of the Remuneration
Committee in which proposals relating to his or her
Page 38
"Compensation and
Nomination Committee"
remuneration are made.
27. The remuneration policy for executive directors and the top
management defines:
a) a balance between the fixed and the variable component
which is consistent with the Company's strategic
objectives and risk management policy. Consistency is
assessed taking into consideration the business's
characteristics and the industry of the Company. The
variable component has in any case a significant weight on
the overall remuneration;
b) caps to the variable components;
c) performance objectives, to which is linked the payment of
the variable components, that are predetermined
measurable and predominantly linked to the long-term
horizon. They are consistent with the Company's strategic
objectives and with the aim of promoting its sustainable
success and includes non-financial parameters, where
relevant;
d) an adequate deferral of a significant part of the variable
component that has been already accrued. Such a deferral
period is consistent with the company's business activity
and its risk profile;
e) provisions that enable the Company to recover and/or
withhold, in whole or in part, the variable components
already paid-out or due, where they were based on data
Page 39
"Directors' compensation"

which subsequently proved to be manifestly misstated. The Company can identify other circumstances in which such provisions are applied;

  • f) clear and predetermined rules for possible termination payments, establishing a cap to the total amount that might be paid out. The cap is linked to a certain amount or a certain number of years of remuneration. No indemnity is paid out if the termination of the office is motivated by director's objectively inadequate results.
    1. The share-based remuneration plans for executive directors and the top management are aligned with the interests of the shareholders over a long-term horizon, providing that a predominant part of the plan has an overall vesting and holding period of at least five years.
    1. The remuneration of non-executive directors is adequate to the competence, professionalism and commitment required by their role within the board of directors and its committees; this remuneration is not related to financial performance objectives, except for a non-significant part.
    1. The remuneration of the members of the control body is adequate to the competence, professionalism and commitment required by their role and the company's size, industry and current situation.
    1. On the occasion of the termination of office and/or dissolution of the relationship with an executive director or general manager, a press release is published as soon as the internal processes that led to the assignment or the recognition of any indemnities and/or other benefits has been concluded. The press release provides for detailed information on:
  • a) the assignment or the recognition of indemnities and/or other benefits, the circumstances that justify their accrual (e.g. due to the expiration of the term of office, its termination or a settlement agreement) and the decision-making process followed for this purpose within the Company;
  • b) the total amount of the indemnity and/or other benefits, the related components (including non-monetary benefits, the vesting of rights connected with incentive plans, the compensation for non-competitive commitments or any other remuneration allocated to any reason and in any form) and the timing of their disbursement (distinguishing the part paid immediately from the part subject to deferral mechanisms);
  • c) the application of any claw-back or malus clauses;
  • d) the compliance of the elements indicated in letters a), b) and c) consistently with the remuneration policy, with a clear indication of the reasons and the decision-making process followed in the event of non-compliance, even if only partial, with the policy itself;
  • e) the procedures that have been or will be followed for the replacement of the executive director or the general manager whose office has been terminated.

Article 6 - Internal control and risk management system Principles XVIII. The Internal Control and Risk Management System consists

  • of a set of rules, procedures and organisational structures for an effective and efficient identification, measurement, management and monitoring of the main risks, aimed at contributing to the sustainable success of the Company.
  • XIX. The board of directors defines the guidelines of the Internal Control and Risk Management System in accordance with the Company's strategies and annually assesses its adequacy and effectiveness.
  • XX. The board of directors defines the principles concerning the coordination and the flow of information among the parties involved in the Internal Control and Risk Management System. Such principles aim at maximising the effectiveness of the system itself, reducing the duplication of activities and ensuring the successful performance of the duties of the control body.
Page 39
"Directors' compensation"
Page 39
"Directors' compensation"
Page 39
"Directors' compensation"
Page 39
"Directors' compensation"
Page 40
"Internal Control and Risk
Management System"
Page 40
"Internal Control
and Risk Management
System"
Page 40
"Internal Control and Risk
Management System"
Page 49

and Risk Management System" Page 40 "Internal Control and Risk Management System" Page 49 "Coordination of bodies involved in the Internal Control and Risk Management System"

Recommendations

    1. The organisation of the Internal Control and Risk Management System involves:
  • a) the board of directors, which plays a role in guiding and assessing the adequacy of the system;
  • b) the Chief Executive Officer, in charge of establishing and maintaining the Internal Control and Risk Management System;
  • c) the Audit and Risk Committee set up within the board of directors, with the task of supporting the board of directors' assessments and decisions relating to the Internal Control and Risk Management System and the approval of periodical financial and non-financial reports. In companies that adopt the "one-tier" or "two-tier" corporate model, the functions of the Audit and Risk Committee can be assigned to the control body;
  • d) the head of the internal audit function who is in charge of verifying that the Internal Control and Risk Management System is functional, adequate and consistent with the guidelines defined by the board of directors;
  • e) the other corporate functions involved in the Internal Control and Risk Management System (such as the risk management functions and the functions dealing with legal and non-compliance risk) which are articulated in relation to the company's size, sector, complexity and risk profile;
  • f) the control body, which monitors the effectiveness of the Internal Control and Risk Management System.
    1. The board of directors, with the support of the Audit and Risk Committee:
  • a) defines the guidelines of the Internal Control and Risk Management System consistently with the Company's strategies and assesses, at least once a year, the adequacy of this system with respect to the company's characteristics and its risk profile, as well as its effectiveness;
  • b) appoints and dismisses the head of the Internal Audit function, defining his or her remuneration which is consistent with the company policies. The board ensures that he or she has adequate resources to carry out his or her duties. If the Internal Audit function is entrusted, as a whole or by operating segments, to an external entity, the board ensures that it meets the adequate requirements of professionalism, independence and organisation, providing adequate reasons for this choice in the corporate governance report;
  • c) approves, at least on an annual basis, the work plan prepared by the head of the Internal Audit function, after hearing the control body and the Chief Executive Officer;
  • d) evaluates the opportunity to take measures to ensure the effectiveness and impartial assistance of the other corporate functions mentioned in recommendation 32 (e). To this end, the board verifies that such functions have adequate professionalism and resources;
  • e) assigns the supervisory functions pursuant to Article 6 (1) (b) of Legislative Decree No. 231/2001 to the control body or to a body established specifically for this purpose (the so-called functions of the "Organismo di Vigilanza"). If the body does not correspond to the control body, the board of directors considers whether to appoint within the body at least one non-executive director and/or a member of the control body and/or the head of a legal or supervisory function of the Company, in order to ensure coordination among the various parties involved in the Internal Control and Risk Management System;
  • f) evaluates, after consultation with the control body, the results presented by the statutory auditor in any letter of suggestions and in the additional report addressed to the control body;
  • g) describes, in the corporate governance report, the main characteristics of the Internal Control and Risk Management System and the methods of coordination among the subjects involved. The report provides information about the national and international reference

Page 40 "Internal Control and Risk Management System"

Page 29 "Functioning of the Board of Directors"

models and best practices adopted and the board's overall assessment of the adequacy of the system itself. Moreover, it provides an adequate explanation of the composition of the control body referred to in letter e) above.

    1. The Chief Executive Officer:
  • a) identifies the main business risks, considering the characteristics of the activities carried out by the Company and its subsidiaries, and periodically submit them to the examination of the board of directors;
  • b) implements the guidelines defined by the board of directors, providing for the design, implementation and management of the Internal Control and Risk Management System and constantly verifying its adequacy and effectiveness, as well as adapting it to the dynamics of the operating conditions and the legislative and regulatory landscape;
  • c) can entrust the internal audit with the tasks of carrying out specific controls on defined operational areas and on compliance with internal rules and procedures in the implementation of company transactions. Such requests are contextually conveyed to the Chairman of the board of directors, to the Chairman of the Audit and Risk Committee and to the Chairman of the control body;
  • d) reports promptly to the Audit and Risk Committee on problems and critical issues that emerged in the performance of his or her activity or of which he or she nevertheless has information so that the Committee can take appropriate actions.
    1. The Audit and Risk Committee is comprised of non-executive directors, the majority of whom are independent, and is chaired by an independent director.

The Committee has expertise that is consistent with the Company's industry and assessment of its risks; at least one member of the committee has adequate knowledge and experience in accounting, finance or risk management.

The Audit and Risk Committee, in assisting the board of directors:

  • a) assesses the external auditor and the control body, the correct application of the accounting principles and, in the case of groups, their homogeneity for the purposes of preparing the consolidated financial statement, after hearing the manager responsible for the corporate financial documents;
  • b) assesses whether the periodic financial and non-financial information is suitable to correctly represent the Company's business model, its strategies, the impact of its business and the performance achieved, in coordination with the committee mentioned in recommendation 1 (a), if established;
  • c) examines the content of the periodic non-financial information relevant to the Internal Control and Risk Management System;
  • d) expresses opinions on specific aspects relating to the identification of the main corporate risks and supports the board of directors' assessments and decisions relating to the management of risks deriving from prejudicial facts of which the latter has become aware;
  • e) examines the periodic and particularly relevant reports prepared by the Internal Audit function;
  • f) monitors the autonomy, adequacy, effectiveness and efficiency of the Internal Audit function;
  • g) can entrust the Internal Audit with the task of carrying out specific controls on defined operational areas. Such a request is contextually conveyed to the chair of the control body;
  • h) reports to the board of directors, at least upon the approval of the annual and half- yearly financial report, on the activities carried out and on the adequacy of the Internal Control and Risk Management System.

Page 43 "Director responsible for the Internal Control System"

√√

Page 44 "Audit and Risk Committee"

    1. The head of the internal audit function is not responsible for any operational area. He or she depends hierarchically on the board of directors and has direct access to all information that is useful for carrying out his or her duty. The head of the Internal Audit function:
  • a) verifies, both on an ongoing basis and in relation to specific needs and in compliance with international standards, the functioning and the suitability of the Internal Control and Risk Management System according to the audit plan. The audit plan is approved by the board of directors and is based on a structured process of analysis and prioritisation of the main risks;
  • b) prepares periodic reports containing adequate information on its activity, on the ways in which risk management is conducted, as well as on compliance with the plans defined for the containment of risks. The periodic reports contain an assessment of the suitability of the Internal Control and Risk Management System;
  • c) prepares promptly, at the request of the control body, reports on events of particular relevance;
  • d) submits the reports referred to in letters b) and c) to the chairs of the control body, of the Audit and Risk Committee and of the board of directors, as well as to the Chief Executive Officer, except in cases where the matter of these reports specifically concerns the activity of these subjects;
  • e) verifies, as part of the audit plan, the reliability of the information systems, including the accounting systems.
    1. The member of the control body who, on his or her own behalf or on behalf of third parties, has an interest in a specific transaction of the Company, provides prompt and exhaustive information to the other members of the same body and to the Chairman of the board of directors about the nature, terms, origin and extent of his or her interest.

The control body and the Audit and Risk Committee promptly exchange relevant information for the performance of their respective duties. The Chairman of the control body, or another member of the control body designated by its Chairman, takes part in the meetings of the Audit and Risk Committee.

Page 45 "Director responsible for the Internal Audit function"

Page 44 "Audit and Risk Committee"

Page 43 "Board of Statutory Auditors"

Società per Azioni Share Capital €501,669,790.83 fully paid up Tax identification number and Milan, Monza-Brianza, Lodi Companies' Register No. 00825790157

Headquarters: Milan (MI) Via Luigi Russolo, 5 Information for Shareholders Saipem SpA, Via Luigi Russolo, 5 20138 Milan (MI)

Relations with institutional investors and financial analysts Fax +39-0244254295 E-mail: [email protected]

Publications Relazione finanziaria annuale (in Italian) drawn up in accordance with Italian Legislative Decree No. 127 of April 9, 1991

Annual Report (in English)

Relazione finanziaria semestrale consolidata al 30 giugno (in Italian)

Interim Financial Report as of June 30 (in English)

Sustainability Report 2022 (in Italian and English)

Also available on Saipem's website: www.saipem.com

Website: www.saipem.com Operator: +39-0244231

Layout and supervision: Studio Joly Srl - Rome - Italy Printing:

saipem spa Via Martiri di Cefalonia, 67 20097 San Donato Milanese (MI)

saipem.com

Talk to a Data Expert

Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.