Annual Report • Oct 31, 2014
Annual Report
Open in ViewerOpens in native device viewer
Safestore Holdings plc
Annual report and financial statements 2014
"
I am pleased with the good progress we have made in driving operational improvements during the course of the year. Our industry leading web platform has driven 12% growth in UK enquiries and the sales team, at the same time as managing to increase the conversion rate of these enquiries, has also achieved an increase in pricing by reducing discounts. Our market leading business in Paris continues to perform well, recording its 16th year of uninterrupted revenue growth.
Frederic Vecchioli, Safestore's Chief Executive Officer "
| Year ended 31 October |
Year ended | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 31 October 2013 |
Change | Change – CER1 |
|
| Underlying and operating metrics | ||||
| Revenue | £97.9m | £96.1m | 1.9% | 2.9% |
| Revenue – like-for-like2 | £97.9m | £94.7m | 3.4% | 4.4% |
| Underlying EBITDA3 | £53.0m | £50.8m | 4.3% | 5.5% |
| Cash tax adjusted earnings per share4 | 13.5p | 11.1p | 21.6% | n/a |
| Dividend per share | 7.45p | 5.75p | 29.6% | n/a |
| Free cash flow (before dividends and financing) | £63.5m | £22.7m | 179.7% | n/a |
| Closing occupancy5 | 68.8% | 65.3% | +3.5ppts | n/a |
| Average storage rate (£) | 24.24 | 24.39 | (0.6%) | 0.5% |
| RevPAF6 | £19.31 | £18.72 | 3.2% | 4.1% |
| EPRA basic NAV per share | £2.18 | £2.10 | 3.6% | n/a |
| Statutory metrics | ||||
| Profit before tax | £52.4m | £48.6m | 7.8% | n/a |
| Basic earnings per share7 | 23.2p | 57.8p | (59.9%) | n/a |
1 Constant exchange rates.
2 Adjusted to reflect the closure of Enfield South and the loss of tenancy income following the sale and short-term leaseback of our Whitechapel site.
3 Underlying EBITDA is defined as Operating Profit before exceptional items, change in fair value of derivatives, gain/loss on investment properties, contingent rent and depreciation.
4 Cash tax adjusted earnings per share is defined as profit or loss for the year before exceptional items, change in fair value of derivatives, gain/loss on investment properties (adjusted for leasehold depreciation), discount unwind on the CGS receivable and the associated tax impacts, as well as exceptional tax items and deferred tax charges.
5 Closing occupancy excludes offices but includes 83,500 sq ft of bulk tenancy as at 31 October 2014 (31 October 2013: 76,600 sq ft).
6 RevPAF (Revenue per average square foot) is calculated as Total Revenue divided by total MLA. MLA is Maximum Lettable Area – following a review of MLA in 2013 across the estate and adjusting for the closures of Enfield South and St Denis Landy, Group MLA has been adjusted to 5.03 million sq ft.
7 Basic earnings per share in 2013 reflected a deferred tax credit of £59.9 million resulting from the conversion of the Group to a Real Estate Investment Trust ("REIT"). The impact of this credit in Basic Earnings per Share was 31.8 pence.
8 As of 21 January 2015, based on the forecasts of nine analysts, the consensus for cash tax adjusted earnings per share for the year ended 31 October 2014 is 13.0 pence.
— Group loan to value ("LTV") lowered to circa 37% and full year finance costs reduced by circa £4.7 million or 25.5%
| Revenue (£'m) | |
|---|---|
| £97.9m | +1.9% |
| 14 | 97.9 |
| 13 | 96.1 |
| 12 | 98.8 |
| 11 | 95.1 |
| 10 | 89.2 |
| £53.0m | +4.3% |
|---|---|
| 14 | 53.0 |
| 13 | 50.8 |
| 12 | 50.3 |
| 11 | 50.5 |
| 10 | 49.2 |
Alan Lewis Non-Executive Chairman I am pleased to announce, on behalf of the Board of Safestore, a good set of results for the year ended 31 October 2014. The reconfigured management team has made a significant impact over the past twelve months and, after completing the rebalancing of our capital structure in the early part of the year, we have set about the task of improving the operational performance of the business in the UK. Whilst we still have work to do, I am pleased with the considerable amount of progress made to date and am confident that the foundations have been laid for continued growth in the business and value creation for our shareholders.
Revenue for the year was £97.9 million, 1.9% ahead of last year (FY2013: £96.1 million) and on a like-for-like and constant currency basis, revenue growth was 4.4%. This result was driven by improving momentum in the UK as we progressed through the year, combined with another strong performance of Une Pièce en Plus, our Parisian business.
Underlying EBITDA increased by 4.3% to £53.0 million (FY2013: £50.8 million). In addition to the improvements in revenue in both the UK and Paris we continued to exercise strong control over costs, delivering a 0.9% reduction compared to the prior year.
Our capital restructuring resulted in a reduction in the underlying finance charge1 of £4.7 million or 25.5% to £13.7 million (FY2013: £18.4 million).
As a result of the above factors, cash tax adjusted earnings per share grew by 21.6% to 13.5 pence (FY2013: 11.1 pence).
In the first quarter of the financial year, we completed our capital restructuring. Debt was reduced by £75 million, principally financed by the sale of our Whitechapel site for net proceeds of £40.5 million, the January 2014 equity placing of 18.6 million new ordinary shares at 175 pence per share, raising net proceeds of £31.6 million, and from internally generated free cash flow. In addition, our bank facilities were renegotiated which provided us with lower interest margins and a further two-year term whilst at the same time allowing the Group to benefit from improved covenants.
The Group's balance sheet is now in good shape with a Group loan-to-value ratio ("Group LTV") of circa 37%. This represents a level of gearing we feel is appropriate for the business to enable the Group to increase returns on equity, maintain financial flexibility and to achieve our medium-term strategic objectives.
The Board is pleased to recommend a 36% increase in the final dividend to 5.30 pence per share (FY2013: 3.90 pence per share), resulting in an increase of 30% in the total dividend to 7.45 pence per share for the year (FY2013: 5.75 pence per share). This total dividend for the year is covered 1.8 times by cash tax earnings (FY2013: 1.9 times).
The Board remains confident in the prospects for the Group and, after a year of consolidation in 2013, will continue its progressive dividend policy in 2015 and beyond. For the current financial year and for the medium term, the Board is comfortable with dividend cover of between 1.7 and 2.0 times. Given the Group's REIT status, it is required to pay out 90% of its UK based property income in dividends. The Group estimates that the aforementioned range of dividend cover will ensure compliance with REIT requirements.
As previously announced, Adrian Martin, our Senior Independent Director, will be retiring from the Board as Non-Executive Director at the next Annual General Meeting in March 2015.
In October 2014, Joanne Louise Kenrick was appointed to the Board as a Non-Executive Director and a member of the Nomination Committee.
Jo is marketing director at Homebase, a subsidiary of the Home Retail Group plc, and a non-executive director of Principality Building Society where she is also a member of the customer and conduct and nominations committees.
On behalf of the Board, I'd like to put on record our gratitude to Adrian for his valuable contribution to Safestore over the last six years and wish him the best for the future. I am also delighted to welcome Jo to the Board with her significant operational, sales and marketing experience in consumer retail across a number of well-known retail brands. Her deep understanding and knowledge of marketing will help support the Group's continued development.
In a year of much change, our people continued to be the key drivers of the success of the business. I would like to take this opportunity to thank all my colleagues throughout the business for their hard work and dedication this year.
Non-Executive Chairman 21 January 2015
1 The underlying finance charge is defined as the interest payable on bank loans and overdrafts and the amortisation of debt issue costs, net of interest receivable from bank deposits. It excludes interest on obligations under finance leases, fair value movements of derivatives, net exchange gains/losses, discount unwind on the CGS receivable and exceptional finance income/expense.
The Board is pleased to recommend a 36% increase in the final dividend to 5.30 pence per share.
Frederic Vecchioli Chief Executive Officer
— Our strategy
Our belief is that the Group has the asset base, management expertise, infrastructure, scale and balance sheet strength to exploit the improving industry dynamics and macro-economic environment. One year ago we laid out our future strategy and we are now pleased to be able to detail significant progress in the report that follows.
We identified three phases to our strategy:
The key performance indicators ("KPIs") of our business are occupancy and average rental rate, which drive the revenue of our business. These KPIs, along with underlying EBITDA, are reported in the highlights section on the inside front cover and on page 1 and within the trading performance section of the Strategic report on pages 10 and 11.
In the first quarter of the financial year we completed the targeted improvements to our capital structure to position the business better for the future. The actions taken were as follows:
announced an amendment and extension of our bank facilities which provides us with lower interest margins, a further two-year term to our bank facilities whilst at the same time allowing the Group to benefit from improved covenants;
finalised the hedging arrangements in relation to the renewed facilities, resulting in an estimated effective blended rate of interest of 4.3% across all our facilities (5.3% in 2013); and
The above actions, in addition to a strong financial performance during the year, have enabled us to achieve a Group loan-to-value ratio ("Group LTV") of circa 37%, which we believe is an appropriate medium-term level for the business.
The rebalanced capital structure has significantly reduced the interest cost on our borrowings and will underpin an improved return on equity, provide financial flexibility and support our medium-term strategic objectives.
Our main focus over the past year has been to improve the operational performance of the existing business, particularly in the UK.
We have a strong, fully invested estate in both the UK and France. Of our 121 stores, 82 are in London and the south-east of England or in Paris and 39 in the UK regions and we operate more stores inside the M25 than any other competitor.
However, we have 1.3 million sq ft of unoccupied space in our UK stores and 0.3 million sq ft in Paris. Our continued focus will be on ensuring that we drive occupancy to utilise this capacity at carefully managed rates.
Our operational team has been instrumental in turning around our trading results. In our relatively immature industry, customer service and selling skills at the point of sale are both essential in earning the trust of the customer and in driving the appropriate balance of volumes and unit price in order to optimise revenue growth in each store. Under the leadership of our new Operations Director, appointed in March, 2014 has been a year of significant operational transformation. The Company has invested in operations by:
— significantly reorganising the structure of the business adding three Regional Manager positions, allowing closer store management oversight and development of the training and coaching of the members of the sales team. The costs of these organisational changes, which were a fundamental element of the business' strategy, have been charged to exceptional items;
In tandem with the above changes, which were implemented throughout the year, we saw steady improvement in the conversion of enquiries into new lets, resulting in 35.4% year-on-year growth in new lets in the fourth quarter of the year. Simultaneously, our average storage rate improved from 7.4% down year-on-year in September 2013 to 4.8% up year-on-year in October 2014 and continues to progress as we enter the new financial year.
We are very pleased with the pace at which the above improvements have been implemented. Whilst we have more work to do and further progress to make, we are already seeing the impact of these actions not only in our results, but also in improved team morale and confidence.
Our store teams have benefited from 12% year-on-year growth in customer enquiries, resulting from our continued investment in our marketing team.
Our operational team has been instrumental in turning around our trading results.
Customers requiring storage now predominantly start their journey by conducting detailed online research in their locality. It is therefore important to ensure that we appear on the top rankings of searches made through the internet. This is managed by analysing around 100,000 search keyword combinations. Online enquiries now represent 79% of our enquiries and 36% of our online enquiries originate from our mobile site, a figure that has increased by 52% in the last twelve months.
There is a clear benefit of scale in the generation of customer enquiries, and the size of our organisation allows us to employ the appropriate skills and to dedicate a significant budget to achieve these results. Our annual marketing budget of over £3.0 million is mainly directed towards the generation of enquiries through sponsored links as well as organic referencing in the search engines. Improved tools and performance have enabled us to reduce our cost per enquiry in the year, resulting in new enquiry growth of 12% from a similar level of expenditure to the prior year.
We constantly enhance our consumer website for desktop and mobile with richer content designed to assist online customers in establishing their storage requirements. We now have an industry leading website in the UK, and we continue to monitor all channels of enquiry generation and adapt our marketing strategy to optimise responses. Such initiatives will enable us to continue to improve our website enquiry capture, which has grown by 4.4% over the last financial year.
Since we integrated Feefo (an independent merchant review system), which allows customers to leave their feedback on the quality of our customer service on the site, into our website in 2013, our customer satisfaction score has remained in excess of 97%.
We remain focused on business as well as domestic customers. Our national network means that we are uniquely placed to further grow the business customer market and in particular National Accounts. Business customers in the UK now constitute 49% of our total space let and have an average length of stay of 31 months. Within our business customer category, our National Accounts business continues to grow with storage revenue increasing by 12% compared with 2013. The space let to National Accounts customers has increased by 17% compared with 2013 and, at 272,000 sq ft, constitutes 10% of our total occupied space in the UK business. Two-thirds of the space occupied by National Accounts customers is outside London, demonstrating the importance of our well invested national estate.
Our centrally located customer support centre in the UK provides ongoing support to our stores, in addition to actioning enquiries that are outside store hours and handling 16% of all enquiries. Our central pricing team is responsible for the management of our dynamic pricing policy and for the implementation of promotional offers and our centrally based National Accounts team is focused on driving growth in our base of business customers who store at multiple locations. Our IT and Finance teams provide day-to-day support to the store operations and ensure that our pricing and marketing policies are effectively implemented and monitored.
We have continued to ensure that our Head Office functions remain lean and efficient and focused on supporting the operational performance of the business. In the year, we have reduced the underlying central cost base of the business by £1.3 million.
Our approach to store development in the future will be pragmatic, flexible and returns focused.
In January 2014 we highlighted the possibility of realising a small number of demonstrably value-creating investments from within the current estate, as well as laying the foundations for longer-term growth. To realise these near-term opportunities from within the estate we indicated a maximum capital expenditure of £10–£15 million through 2014 and 2015 over and above our ongoing annual maintenance capital expenditure.
In Paris, we completed the acquisition of the freehold of our leasehold St Denis store for €3.6 million in May 2014. As previously indicated, we also closed our loss-making leasehold store in the St Denis area (Landy), consolidating its occupancy where possible into the freehold St Denis store.
In Southend, we operate out of a purpose-built new store. We are pleased to have completed the unconditional sale of the site of the previous store to Lidl for £1.1 million in June 2014, resulting in a gain of £0.4 million.
We believe that the land we own on the A4 in London at Chiswick represents an attractive opportunity and we are proceeding with the development of a new store on this site. The estimated cost to build this store is included in the £10–£15 million guidance above and we anticipate the store opening in Q2 2016. Our other pipeline sites in Wandsworth and Birmingham continue to be evaluated for potential development.
At New Malden our landlord has now obtained planning permission for the redevelopment of the site and it is likely that the landlord will serve its option to break the lease in return for a premium significantly higher than the asset valuation as an ongoing trading store. If the landlord exercises the option then our current best estimate is that the store would most likely close in H2 2015. We anticipate relocating a significant proportion of the store's occupancy to other nearby stores in our portfolio.
On 28 October 2014 we completed the re-gear of our Edinburgh Gyle store to remove a mutual break clause operable in June 2016. The lease will now continue to June 2026 and has been valued accordingly.
Active and effective management of our property portfolio has always been a key priority. Since the financial year end we have extended leases on a further three leasehold properties at Guildford, Swanley and Harlow, providing the business with long-term tenure on these properties. It is estimated that this activity will add approximately £3.7 million to our asset valuation. This follows the re-gear of six leases during 2013.
We continue to seek other asset management opportunities to develop our store portfolio. Further lease re-gearing and income generation opportunities will be explored on an ongoing basis.
However, our short-term focus will be on filling the 1.6 million sq ft of currently available space, which is the equivalent of 40 full stores. The operational cost of managing this space is already embedded in our relatively fixed cost base and therefore a high proportion of any incremental revenues will translate into profits.
We believe that this strategy, combined with positive market and economic dynamics and the quality of our property portfolio, means that we are well positioned for further growth and to deliver strong returns to our shareholders.
The self-storage market has been growing in the last 15 years across many European countries but few regions offer the unique characteristic of London and Paris, both of which consist of large, wealthy and densely populated markets. In the London region, the population is 13 million with a density of 5,200 inhabitants per square mile in the region, 11,000 per square mile in the city of London and up to 32,000 per square mile in the densest boroughs.
The population of the Paris urban area is 10.7 million with a density of 9,300 inhabitants per square mile in the urban area but 54,000 per square mile in the city of Paris and first belt, where 75% of our French stores are located and which has one of the highest densities in the western world. 85% of the Paris region population lives in the city core versus the rest of the urban area which compares with 60% in the London region. There are currently 202 storage centres within the M25 as compared to only 85 in the Paris urban area. The GDPs generated in the London and Paris conurbations are roughly equivalent and are more than twice that of any other European equivalent.
In addition, barriers to entry in these two city markets are high, due to land values and limited availability of sites as well as planning regulation. This is the case for Paris and its first belt in particular, which inhibits new development possibilities.
Our combined operations in London and Paris, with 67 stores, £65.4 million revenue and £37.5 million EBITDA, offer a unique exposure to the two most attractive European self-storage markets.
We have a strong position in both the UK and Paris markets, operating 97 stores in the UK, 58 of which are in London and the south-east, and 24 stores in Paris.
In the UK, 68% of our revenue is generated by our stores in London and the South-east. On average, our stores in London and the south-east are smaller than in the rest of the UK but the occupancy levels and rental rate achieved are higher. In London we operate 43 stores within the M25, more than any other competitor.
In France, we have a leading position in the heart of the affluent city of Paris market with eight stores branded as Une Pièce en Plus ("UPP") ("A spare room") with more than twice the number of stores of our two major competitors combined. 75% of the UPP stores are located in a cluster within a five-mile radius of the city centre, which facilitates strong operational and marketing synergies as well as options to differentiate and channel customers to the right store subject to their preference for convenience or price affordability. The Parisian market has attractive socio-demographic characteristics for self-storage and we believe that UPP enjoys unique strategic strength in such an attractive market.
Together, London, the south-east and Paris represent 68% of our owned stores, 76% of our revenues, as well as 55% of our available capacity.
In addition, Safestore has the benefit of a leading national presence in the UK regions where the stores are predominantly located in the centre of key metropolitan areas such as Birmingham, Manchester, Liverpool, Bristol, Glasgow and Edinburgh.
In the UK we own three development sites with planning permission at Chiswick and Wandsworth in London and in central Birmingham. We plan to open the Chiswick site in early 2016 and continue to assess the value of the Wandsworth and Birmingham sites for self-storage and alternative purposes.
| London and south-east |
Rest of UK | UK total |
Paris | Group total |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of stores | 58 | 39 | 97 | 24 | 121 |
| Let square feet (m sq ft) | 1.55 | 1.13 | 2.68 | 0.78 | 3.46 |
| Maximum lettable area (m sq ft) | 2.18 | 1.84 | 4.02 | 1.01 | 5.03 |
| Average let square feet per store (k sq ft) | 27 | 29 | 28 | 33 | 29 |
| Average store capacity (k sq ft) | 38 | 47 | 41 | 42 | 42 |
| Closing occupancy (%) | 71.0 | 61.4 | 66.6 | 77.2 | 68.8 |
| Average rate (£ per sq ft) | 26.30 | 16.67 | 22.21 | 30.94 | 24.24 |
| Revenue (£'m) | 48.7 | 23.1 | 71.8 | 26.1 | 97.9 |
| Average revenue per store (£'m) | 0.84 | 0.59 | 0.74 | 1.09 | 0.81 |
The self-storage market in the UK and France remains relatively immature compared to geographies such as the USA and Australia. The Self Storage Association ("SSA") Annual Survey (April 2014) confirmed that, in the UK, self-storage capacity remains in line with 2013 at 0.5 sq ft per head of population as compared with 7.3 sq ft in the USA and 1.4 sq ft in Australia. While capacity increased significantly between 2006 and 2009 with an average of 34 stores per annum being opened, new additions have been limited to an average of nine stores per annum between 2010 and 2013.
In the Paris market, we estimate the density to be even lower at around 0.36 sq ft per inhabitant.
New supply in London and Paris is likely to be limited in the short term as a result of planning restrictions and the availability of suitable land. Respondents to the SSA survey indicated that the majority of the limited future anticipated development of new stores will take place outside these markets. In fact, capacity in London is expected to contract in the short term as the limited planned openings are offset by site closures as alternative use opportunities have been realised.
The supply in the UK market, according to the SSA survey, remains relatively fragmented. Safestore is the leader by number of stores with 97 wholly owned sites, followed by Big Yellow with 68 wholly owned stores, Access with 55 stores, Storage King and Lok'n Store with 24 stores each and Shurgard with 22 stores. In aggregate, the six leading brands account for less than 30% of the UK store portfolio. The remaining circa 700 self-storage outlets (including 141 container based operations) are independently owned in small chains or single units.
The Paris market is significantly more concentrated with three main operators. Our French business, UPP, is mainly present in the core wealthier and more densely populated inner Paris and first belt areas, whereas our two main competitors, Shurgard and Homebox, have a greater presence in the outskirts and second belt of Paris.
Consumer awareness of self-storage is increasing but is still low, providing an opportunity for future industry growth. The SSA survey indicated that 62% of consumers either knew nothing about the service offered by self-storage operators or had not heard of self-storage at all. The opportunity to grow awareness, combined with limited new industry supply and improving economic conditions, makes for an attractive industry backdrop.
There are numerous drivers of self-storage growth. Most private or business customers need storage either temporarily or permanently for different reasons at any point in the economic cycle, resulting in a market depth that is in our view the reason for its exceptional resilience. The growth of the market is driven both by the fluctuation of economic conditions, which has an impact on the mix of demand, and by growing awareness of the product.
Our domestic customers' need for storage is often driven by lifestyle events such as births, marriages, bereavements, divorces or by the housing market including house moves and developments and moves between rental properties. It is estimated that UK owner-occupied housing transactions drive around 10–15% of new lets.
Our business customer base includes a range of businesses from start-up online retailers through to multi-national corporates utilising our national coverage to store in multiple locations while maintaining flexibility in their cost base.
| Business and personal customers | UK | France |
|---|---|---|
| Personal customers | ||
| Numbers (% of total) | 71% | 79% |
| Square feet occupied (% of total) | 51% | 61% |
| Average length of stay (months) | 20.8 | 26.1 |
| Business customers | ||
| Numbers (% of total) | 29% | 21% |
| Square feet occupied (% of total) | 49% | 39% |
| Average length of stay (months) | 30.9 | 31.5 |
The SSA survey also highlighted the increasing importance for operators of a strong online presence. 67% of those surveyed confirmed that an internet search would be their chosen means of finding a self-storage unit to contact.
Safestore's customer base is resilient and diverse and consists of 48,000 domestic, business and National Accounts customers across London, Paris and the UK regions.
As discussed on page 8, Safestore operates in a market with relatively low consumer awareness. It is anticipated that this will increase over time as the industry matures. To date, despite the financial crisis and the implementation of VAT on self-storage in 2012, the industry has been exceptionally resilient. With more favourable economic conditions and limited new supply coming into the self-storage market, the industry is well positioned for growth.
With more stores inside London's M25 than any other operator and a strong position in central Paris, Safestore has leading positions in the two most important and demographically favourable markets in Europe. In addition, our regional presence in the UK is unsurpassed and contributes to the success of our industry leading National Accounts business. In the UK, Safestore is the leading operator by number of wholly owned stores.
Our capital-efficient portfolio of 121 wholly owned stores in the UK and Paris consists of a mix of freehold and leasehold stores. In order to grow our business and secure the best locations for our facilities we have maintained a flexible approach to leasehold and freehold developments.
Currently, one-third of our stores in the UK are leaseholds with an average remaining lease length of twelve years. Although our property valuation for leaseholds is conservatively based on future cash flows until the next contractual lease renewal date, Safestore has a demonstrable track record of successfully re-gearing leases several years before renewal whilst at the same time achieving concessions from landlords.
In England, we benefit from the Landlord and Tenant Act that protects our rights for renewal except in case of redevelopment. The vast majority of our leasehold stores have building characteristics or locations in retail parks that make current usage either the highest and best use of the property or the only one authorised by planning. We observe that our landlords, who are property investors, value the quality of Safestore as a tenant and typically prefer to extend the length of the leases that they have in their portfolio, enabling Safestore to maintain favourable terms.
In Paris, where 50% of stores are leaseholds, all our leases benefit from the well enshrined Commercial Lease statute that provides that tenants own the commercial property of the premises and that they are legally entitled to indefinitely renew their lease at a rent that is indexed to the National Construction Index published by the state.
In the event that a landlord wants to terminate a lease, the law in Paris requires that he has to fully indemnify the tenant for the loss of its commercial property which, in the case of UPP, given the difficulty in finding new premises in Paris, would amount to the full value of the lost business. The solidity of the tenant protection has been tested three times in the courts by UPP resulting, in each case, in the landlords ultimately abandoning their plans. The tenant's rights have been reinforced in 2014 with new regulations creating in most cases a statutory pre-emption right for the tenant if a landlord wants to transfer the freehold interest. Taking into account the legal context, the valuer values the French leasehold based on an indefinite property tenure, similar to freeholds.
Our experience is that being flexible in its approach has enabled Safestore to operate from properties that would have been otherwise unavailable and to generate strong returns on capital invested.
Safestore excels in the generation of customer enquiries which are received through a variety of channels including the internet, telephone and "walk-ins". In the early days of the industry, local directories and store visibility were key driver of enquiries. The internet is now by far the dominant channel, accounting for 79% of our enquiries in the UK and 63% in France. Telephone enquiries comprise 13% of the total (30% in France) and "walk-ins" amount to only 8% (12% in France). This key change is a clear benefit to the leading operators that possess the budget and the management skills necessary to generate a commanding presence in the major search engines. Safestore has developed a leading digital marketing platform that has generated 50% enquiry growth over the last four years.
Our enquiries are predominantly handled directly by the stores and, in the UK, we have a Customer Support Centre ("CSC") which now handles 16% of all enquiries, in particular when the store staff are busy handling calls or outside normal store opening hours.
Our pricing platform provides the store and CSC staff with system-generated real time prices managed by our centrally based yield management team. Local staff have certain levels of discretion to flex the system generated prices but this is continually monitored.
Customer service standards are high and customer satisfaction feedback is consistently extremely positive. Over the last twelve months we have achieved 97% customer satisfaction, based on "excellent" or "good" ratings as collected by Feefo via our customer website.
The key drivers of sales success are the capacity to generate enquiries in a digital world, the capacity to provide a great number of storage locations that are conveniently located close to the customers' requirements and the ability to maintain a consistently high quality, motivated retail team that is able to secure customer sales at an appropriate storage rate, all of which can be better provided by larger, more efficient organisations.
The business now has in excess of 48,000 business and domestic customers with an average length of stay of 31 months and 22 months respectively.
The cost base of the business is relatively fixed. Each store typically employs three staff. Our Group Head Office comprises business support functions such as yield management, property, marketing, HR, IT and finance.
Since the completion of the rebalancing of our capital structure in early 2014, Safestore has secure financing, a strong balance sheet and significant covenant headroom providing the Group with financial flexibility and the ability to grow organically and via carefully selected new developments.
At 31 October 2014 we had 1.3 million sq ft of unoccupied space in the UK and 0.3 million sq ft in France, equivalent to over 40 full new stores. Our absolute focus is on filling the spare capacity in our stores at optimally yield-managed prices. The operational leverage of our business model will ensure that the bulk of the incremental revenue converts to profit given the fixed nature of our cost base.
| UK operating performance | 2014 | 2013 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue: like-for-like (£'m) | 71.8 | 68.8 | 4.4% |
| Revenue (£'m) | 71.8 | 70.2 | 2.3% |
| EBITDA (£'m) | 36.7 | 34.8 | 5.5% |
| Closing occupancy (let sq ft: million)1 | 2.68 | 2.56 | 4.7% |
| Closing occupancy (% of MLA) | 66.6 | 63.5 | +3.1ppts |
| Average storage rate (£) | 22.21 | 22.19 | 0.1% |
1 Closing occupancy excludes offices but includes 83,500 sq ft of bulk tenancy as at 31 October 2014 (31 October 2013: 76,600 sq ft).
The UK business performed strongly with like-for-like revenue up 4.4%. At the end of the year, UK occupancy was 66.6%, an increase of 3.1 percentage points on the prior year.
The table below illustrates the continuing improving revenue trends over the last 14 months.
| Variance vs prior year | September 2013 |
October 2013 |
November 2013 |
December 2013 |
January 2014 |
February 2014 |
March 2014 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total revenue | (6.9%) | (5.3%) | (3.7%) | (2.9%) | (3.9%) | (1.5%) | (0.3%) |
| Like-for-like revenue | (5.5%) | (3.8%) | (1.3%) | (0.3%) | (1.3%) | 1.2% | 2.4% |
| Closing occupancy | (1.1%) | 0.5% | 1.6% | 2.2% | 2.6% | 2.8% | 4.0% |
| Average rate | (7.4%) | (4.8%) | (4.7%) | (4.4%) | (4.4%) | (2.8%) | (1.9%) |
| Variance vs prior year | April 2014 |
May 2014 |
June 2014 |
July 2014 |
August 2014 |
September 2014 |
October 2014 |
| Total revenue | 0.6% | 2.5% | 4.9% | 6.2% | 8.1% | 8.3% | 8.8% |
| Like-for-like revenue | 2.9% | 4.4% | 6.6% | 7.8% | 9.8% | 10.0% | 10.4% |
| Closing occupancy | 3.2% | 3.0% | 4.5% | 4.8% | 5.3% | 5.8% | 4.7% |
| Average rate | (0.9%) | 1.5% | 3.6% | 3.2% | 4.0% | 4.4% | 4.8% |
Whilst the UK rate was up 0.1% for the full year, the improvement in the year-on-year position as the year progressed reflected the pricing policy changes made in the first half of the year and the subsequent increased discipline in relation to discounting. In October 2014, rate was up 4.8% year-on-year demonstrating the momentum in the improving rate performance.
Our key focus in the UK, throughout the year, has been on our store operational performance and on improving the conversion of enquiries at an appropriate rate to maximise revenues. New lets growth of 35.4% in the final quarter and 19.8% over the year has continued to drive performance, with 125,000 sq ft of occupancy added over the year.
Finally, control of our cost base has been a strong focus in the year. Despite an increase in the share based payment charge of £1.1 million in the year, the total cost base has still reduced in the year to £35.1 million (2013: £35.4 million).
EBITDA for the UK business was £36.7 million (2013: £34.8 million), an increase of £1.9 million or 5.5%.
| Paris operating performance | 2014 | 2013 | Change | Change – CER2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue (£'m) | 26.1 | 25.9 | 0.8% | 4.4% |
| EBITDA (£'m) | 16.3 | 16.0 | 1.9% | 5.6% |
| Closing occupancy (let sq ft: million)1 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 2.6% | n/a |
| Closing occupancy (% of MLA) | 77.2% | 71.9% | +5.3ppts | n/a |
| Average storage rate (£) | 30.94 | 31.63 | (2.2%) | 1.4% |
1 Closing occupancy excludes offices but includes 83,500 sq ft of bulk tenancy as at 31 October 2014 (31 October 2013: 76,600 sq ft).
2 Constant exchange rates.
Our Paris business performed strongly against the backdrop of a challenging macro-economic environment, demonstrating the quality and market leading position of our estate. Revenue on a CER basis was up 4.4%. Our average rate, on a CER basis, improved by 1.4% on the prior year. Despite the planned closure of our Landy store in October 2014, the square feet occupied was 20,000 sq ft ahead of the prior year. As a result, occupancy as a percentage of MLA increased by 5.3 percentage points to 77.2%.
Revenue growth in Sterling was 0.8%. The impact of a 4% weakening in the average Euro exchange rate was partly mitigated by the foreign exchange swaps in place on €10.5 million of Paris profitability, at an average rate of €1.236:£1. The benefit of these hedging arrangements is reflected within EBITDA but not in the revenue line.
Our strategy of achieving an appropriate balance of rate and occupancy growth has been successful and we are now in the seventh consecutive quarter of year-on-year rate growth and 16th year of uninterrupted revenue growth in local currency.
The cost base in Paris remained well controlled during the year and, despite adverse currency movements, and the fact that the prior year benefited from the recognition of €1.0 million relating to an insurance claim on our Nanterre store, the cost base reduced to £9.8 million (2013: £9.9 million).
The improvements in revenue and underlying cost base reductions resulted in EBITDA in France of £16.3 million (2013: £16.0 million), an improvement of £0.3 million or 1.9% on 2013. On a constant currency basis, EBITDA grew by 5.6%.
Chief Executive Officer 21 January 2015
A diversified portfolio let to a large number of customers should help to mitigate any negative impact arising from changing conditions in the financial and property market.
The Group faces a number of risks which, if they arise, could affect its ability to achieve its strategic objectives. The Board is responsible for determining the nature of these risks and ensuring appropriate mitigating actions are in place for managing them.
Effective risk management requires awareness and engagement at all levels of our organisation. It is for this reason that risk management is incorporated into the day-to-day management of our business, as well as being reflected in the Group's core processes and controls. The Board oversees the risk management strategy and the effectiveness of the Group's internal control framework. Risks are considered at every business level and are assessed, discussed and taken into account when deciding upon future strategy, approving transactions and monitoring performance.
Strategic risks are identified, assessed and managed by the Main Board and Audit Committee. They are reviewed at Board level to ensure they are valid, and they represent the key risks associated with the current strategic direction of the Group. Operational risks are identified, assessed and managed by Executive Team members and reported to the Main Board and Audit Committee. These cover all areas of the business, such as finance, operations, investment, development and corporate risks.
The risk management process commences with rigorous risk identification sessions incorporating contributions from functional managers and Executive Management Team members. The output is reviewed and discussed by members of senior management from across the business. The Executive Management Team identifies and prioritises the top business risks, which are then challenged by the Board. The process focuses on the identification of key strategic, financial and operational risks. The potential impact and likelihood of the risks occurring are determined, key risk mitigations are identified, and the current level of risk assessed against the Board's risk appetite. These top business risks form the basis for the principal risks and uncertainties detailed in the section below.
The principal risks and uncertainties described are considered to have the most significant effect on Safestore's strategic objectives. This list is not intended to be exhaustive. Some risks, however, remain outside of the Group's full control, for example macroeconomic issues, changes in government regulation and acts of terrorism.
The key strategic and operational risks are monitored by the Board and are defined as those which could prevent us from achieving our business goals. Our current strategic and operational risks and key mitigating actions are as follows:
| Risk | Current mitigation activities |
|---|---|
| Strategy | |
| The Group develops business plans based on a wide range of variables. Incorrect assumptions about the self-storage |
— The strategy development process draws on internal and external analysis of the self-storage market, emerging customer trends and a range of other factors. |
| market or changes in the needs of customers, or the activities of customers may adversely affect the returns achieved by the Group |
— Strengthened focus on yield management with regular review of demand levels and pricing at each individual store. |
| — The portfolio is geographically diversified with performance monitoring covering the personal and business customers by segments. |
|
| Finance risk | |
| Lack of funding resulting in inability to meet business plans, satisfy liabilities or breach of covenants |
— Funding requirements for business plans and the timing for commitments are reviewed regularly as part of the monthly management accounts. |
| — The Group manages liquidity in accordance with Board approved policies designed to ensure that the Group has adequate funds for its ongoing needs. |
|
| — The Board regularly monitors financial covenant ratios and headroom. | |
| — The refinanced banking facilities were extended to 30 June 2018 during FY2014 and the US private placement notes mature in five and ten years. |
|
| Treasury risk | |
| Adverse currency or interest rate movements | — Guidelines set for our exposure to fixed and floating interest rates and use of interest rate and currency swaps to manage this risk. |
| — Foreign currency denominated assets financed by borrowings in the same currency where appropriate. |
|
| — The Group has interest rate derivative contracts in place that were re-aligned during FY2014 to cover the full term of the bank facilities and the US private placement notes. |
|
| Property investment and development | |
| Acquisition and development of properties that fail to meet performance expectations |
— Thorough due diligence conducted and detailed analysis undertaken prior to Board approval for property investment and development. |
| Overexposure to developments within a short timeframe | — The Group's overall exposure to developments is monitored and projects phased. |
| — The performance of individual properties is benchmarked against target returns. | |
| Valuation risk | |
| Value of our properties declining as a result of external market or internal management factors |
— Independent valuations conducted by experienced, independent, professionally qualified valuers. |
| In the absence of relevant transactional evidence, valuations can be inherently subjective leading to a degree of uncertainty |
— A diversified portfolio let to a large number of customers should help to mitigate any negative impact arising from changing conditions in the financial and property market. |
| — Headroom of loan to value banking covenants is maintained and reviewed. | |
| — The lowered gearing levels during FY2014 provides enhanced headroom on valuations and significantly reduces the likelihood of covenants being endangered. |
| Risk | Current mitigation activities |
|---|---|
| Occupancy risk | |
| A potential loss of income and increased vacancy due to falling demand, oversupply, or customer default |
— Personal and business customers cover a wide range of segments, sectors and geographic territories with limited exposure to any single customer. |
| — Dedicated specialised support introduced during FY2014 for improved enquiry capture. |
|
| — Weekly monitoring of occupancy levels and revised regional structure in FY2014 to facilitate closer management of stores. |
|
| — Monitoring of reasons for customers vacating and exit interviews conducted. | |
| — Independent feedback facility for customer experience. | |
| — The occupancy rate across the portfolio has been grown through FY2014 due to flexibility offered on deals by in-house marketing and the customer support centre. |
|
| Real estate investment trust ("REIT") risk | |
| Failure to comply with the REIT legislation could expose the Group to potential tax penalties or loss of its REIT status |
— Internal monitoring procedures in place to ensure that the appropriate rules and legislation are complied with and this is formally reported to the Board. |
| Business interruption risk | |
| Major events mean that the Group is unable to carry | — Business continuity plans in place and tested. |
| out its business for a sustained period | — Back-up systems at remote places and remote working capabilities. |
| — Reviews and assessments are undertaken periodically for enhancements |
to supplement the existing compliant aspects of buildings and processes.
Andy Jones Chief Financial Officer
The table below sets out the Group's underlying results of operations for the year ended 31 October 2014 and the year ended 31 October 2013.
Management considers the below presentation of earnings to be representative of the underlying performance of the business.
Underlying EBITDA increased by 4.3% to £53.0 million (2013: £50.8 million), reflecting a 1.9% increase in revenue and a 0.9% saving in the underlying cost base (see pages 17 and 18).
The 30.7% increase in underlying profit before tax to £28.5 million (2013: £21.8 million) was driven by a 25.5% reduction in finance charges from £18.4 million to £13.7 million, which was the result of management actions taken to strengthen the Group's capital structure during the year, together with the improved operating performance of the business.
Given the Group's REIT status in the UK, tax is only paid in France and the tax due in the period increased to £1.2 million (2013: £0.9 million).
Management considers that the most representative earnings per share ("EPS") measure is cash tax adjusted EPS which has increased by 21.6% to 13.5 pence (2013: 11.1 pence). EPRA EPS also reflects the deferred tax on underlying trading and increased by 26.3% to 12.5 pence from 9.9 pence in 2013.
| 2014 £'m |
2013 £'m |
Movement % |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 97.9 | 96.1 | 1.9% |
| Underlying costs | (44.9) | (45.3) | (0.9%) |
| Underlying EBITDA | 53.0 | 50.8 | 4.3% |
| Leasehold rent | (10.3) | (10.2) | 1.0% |
| Underlying EBITDA after leasehold rent | 42.7 | 40.6 | 5.2% |
| Depreciation | (0.5) | (0.4) | 25.0% |
| Finance charges | (13.7) | (18.4) | (25.5%) |
| Underlying profit before tax | 28.5 | 21.8 | 30.7% |
| Current tax | (1.2) | (0.9) | 33.3% |
| Cash tax earnings | 27.3 | 20.9 | 30.6% |
| Underlying deferred tax | (2.1) | (2.2) | (4.5%) |
| EPRA earnings | 25.2 | 18.7 | |
| Average shares in issue (million) | 202.1 | 187.9 | |
| Underlying (cash tax adjusted) EPS (pence) | 13.5 | 11.1 | 21.6% |
| EPRA EPS (pence) | 12.5 | 9.9 | 26.3% |
The table below reconciles the operating profit included in the income statement to underlying EBITDA.
| 2014 £'m |
2013 £'m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Operating profit | 75.6 | 69.2 |
| Adjusted for: | ||
| – gain on investment properties | (24.1) | (21.5) |
| – depreciation | 0.5 | 0.4 |
| – contingent rent | 1.2 | 0.7 |
| – change in fair value of derivatives | (1.2) | 1.3 |
| Exceptional items: | ||
| – restructuring costs | 0.8 | 1.7 |
| – insurance proceeds | — | (1.6) |
| – VAT and REIT related costs | — | 0.3 |
| – other | 0.2 | 0.3 |
| Underlying EBITDA | 53.0 | 50.8 |
The main reconciling items between operating profit and underlying EBITDA are the gain on investment properties, which increased by £2.6 million from £21.5 million in 2013 to £24.1 million in 2014, and exceptional items which increased from a net charge of £0.7 million in 2013 to £1.0 million in 2014.
The Group is organised and managed in two operating segments based on geographical region. The table below details the underlying profitability of each region.
| 2014 | 2013 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UK £'m |
France £'m |
Total £'m |
UK £'m |
France £'m |
Total £'m |
|
| Revenue | 71.8 | 26.1 | 97.9 | 70.2 | 25.9 | 96.1 |
| Underlying cost of sales | (24.4) | (6.2) | (30.6) | (25.1) | (5.6) | (30.7) |
| Gross profit | 47.4 | 19.9 | 67.3 | 45.1 | 20.3 | 65.4 |
| Gross margin | 66% | 76% | 69% | 64% | 78% | 68% |
| Underlying administrative expenses | (10.7) | (3.6) | (14.3) | (10.3) | (4.3) | (14.6) |
| Underlying EBITDA | 36.7 | 16.3 | 53.0 | 34.8 | 16.0 | 50.8 |
| EBITDA margin | 51% | 62% | 54% | 50% | 62% | 53% |
EBITDA in the UK increased by £1.9 million or 5.5% to £36.7 million (2013: £34.8 million), underpinned by a £1.6 million increase in revenue, driven primarily by a 4.7% increase in closing occupancy, together with a £0.3 million saving in costs.
In the Parisian business, EBITDA increased by £0.3 million or 1.9% to £16.3 million (2013: £16.0 million), driven by administrative expense savings of £0.7 million. On a constant currency basis, EBITDA in France grew by 5.6%.
Revenue for the Group is primarily derived from the rental of self-storage space and the sale of ancillary products such as insurance and merchandise (e.g. packing materials and padlocks) in both the UK and France.
The split of the Group's revenues by geographical segment is set out below for 2014 and 2013.
| 2014 | % of total | 2013 | % of total | % change | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UK | £'m | 71.8 | 73% | 70.2 | 73% | 2.3% |
| France | ||||||
| Local currency | €'m | 32.1 | 30.7 | 4.4% | ||
| Average exchange rate | €:£ | 1.228 | 1.185 | |||
| France in Sterling | £'m | 26.1 | 27% | 25.9 | 27% | 0.8% |
| Total revenue | 97.9 | 100% | 96.1 | 100% | 1.9% |
The Group's revenue increased by 1.9% or £1.8 million in the year. The Group's occupied space was 145,000 sq ft higher at 31 October 2014 (3.46 million sq ft) than at 31 October 2013 (3.32 million sq ft). However, the average rental rate for the Group was 0.6% lower in 2014 at £24.24 than in 2013 (£24.39).
When the Group's revenue is adjusted for the closure of the Enfield South store in H2 2013 and for the loss of tenancy income subsequent to the sale of the Whitechapel store in November 2013, like-for-like revenue increased by 3.4%1 . The increase in like-for-like revenue on a CER basis2 was 4.4%, reflecting the weakening of the Euro during the year.
In the UK, revenue increased by £1.6 million or 2.3%, and on a like-for-like basis it was up by 4.4%. The let sq ft was 125,000 sq ft higher at 31 October 2014 than at 31 October 2013, with the average rental rate increasing marginally from £22.19 in 2013 to £22.21 in 2014.
Revenue in the Parisian business increased by 4.4% on a constant currency basis. However, the weakening of the Euro during the financial year had an adverse currency impact of approximately £0.9 million on translation, so the increase was only £0.2 million, or 0.8%, when reported in Sterling. Closing occupancy increased by 2.6% to 0.78 million sq ft, and the rental rate was €38.01 for the year, an increase of 1.4% on 2013 (€37.49).
1 Adjusted to reflect the closure of Enfield South and the loss of tenancy income following the sale and short-term leaseback of our Whitechapel site.
2 Constant exchange rates.
The table below details the key movements in cost of sales between 2013 and 2014.
| 2014 £'m |
2013 £'m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Reported cost of sales | (32.3) | (31.8) |
| Adjusted for: | ||
| – depreciation | 0.5 | 0.4 |
| – contingent rent | 1.2 | 0.7 |
| Underlying cost of sales | (30.6) | (30.7) |
| Underlying cost of sales for 2013: | (30.7) | |
| – foreign exchange (including currency swaps) | 0.2 | |
| – Nanterre insurance proceeds (received in FY2013) | (0.8) | |
| – rates and facilities savings | 0.4 | |
| – other cost improvements | 0.3 | |
| Underlying cost of sales for 2014 | (30.6) |
In order to arrive at underlying cost of sales, adjustments are made to remove the impact of depreciation and contingent rent.
The weakening of the Euro during the year resulted in a decrease in the Sterling equivalent of the French cost of sales of £0.2 million.
During the year ended 31 December 2013, £0.8 million was credited to cost of sales, in respect of insurance proceeds relating to the fire that destroyed the Nanterre store and Head Office in December 2010, which was not repeated in the current year.
Management has taken a number of actions to reduce the cost base which, during the year, included rates appeals and greater focus on store facilities costs, which generated £0.4 million of savings. In addition, a reduction in other costs of £0.3 million resulted largely from these actions.
The table below reconciles reported administrative expenses to underlying administrative expenses and details the key movements in underlying administrative expenses between 2013 and 2014.
| 2014 £'m |
2013 £'m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Reported administrative expenses | (14.1) | (16.6) |
| Adjusted for: | ||
| – exceptional items | 1.0 | 0.7 |
| – changes in fair value of derivatives | (1.2) | 1.3 |
| Underlying administrative expenses | (14.3) | (14.6) |
| Underlying administrative expenses for 2013: | (14.6) | |
| – foreign exchange | 0.1 | |
| – share based payments (including national insurance) | (1.1) | |
| – employee and related cost savings | 0.7 | |
| – professional and adviser fees | 0.4 | |
| – other cost improvements | 0.2 | |
| Underlying administrative expenses for 2014 | (14.3) |
In order to arrive at underlying administrative expenses, adjustments are made to remove the impact of exceptional items and changes in the fair value of derivatives.
Exceptional items in the period are costs principally associated with the restructuring of the Group's senior management team and certain operational functions during the year.
Underlying administrative expenses were reduced by £0.3 million to £14.3 million (2013: £14.6 million).
The weakening of the Euro during the year resulted in a £0.1 million decrease in the Sterling equivalent of French administrative expenses.
Charges for share based payments increased to £1.1 million, due to improved performance against targets. This increase was offset by savings in employee costs, reflecting headcount reductions and lower advisers' fees totalling £1.1 million, and other cost savings which amounted to £0.2 million.
The gain on investment properties consists of the revaluation gains and losses with respect to investment properties under IAS 40 and finance lease depreciation for the interests in leaseholds and other items as detailed below.
| 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|
| £'m | £'m | |
| Movement on investment properties | 29.0 | 26.0 |
| Depreciation on leasehold properties | (4.9) | (4.5) |
| Gain on investment properties | 24.1 | 21.5 |
The movement in investment properties reflects the combination of yield movements within the valuations together with the impact of changes in the cash flow metrics of each store. In a normal year the key variables are rate per sq ft, stabilised occupancy, number of months to reach stabilised occupancy and the yields applied.
In the current financial year the UK business contributed £23.7 million to the positive valuation movement and the French business contributed £5.3 million, reflecting improving trading metrics.
Operating profit increased by £6.4 million from £69.2 million in 2013 to £75.6 million in 2014. The increase predominantly reflects the £2.2 million increase in underlying EBITDA, a swing in the fair value of the forward currency contracts of £2.5 million from a loss of £1.3 million in 2013 to a gain of £1.2 million in 2014, and a £2.6 million increase in the gain on investment properties from £21.5 million in 2013 to £24.1 million in 2014.
Net finance costs consist of interest receivable on bank deposits, interest payable and interest on obligations under finance leases.
| 2014 £'m |
2013 £'m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Net bank interest payable | (13.7) | (18.4) |
| Interest on obligations under finance leases | (4.2) | (5.0) |
| Fair value movement on derivatives (including recycling of hedge reserve) | 0.3 | 2.8 |
| Net exchange losses | (3.7) | — |
| Exceptional finance expenses | (2.1) | — |
| Unwinding of discount on CGS receivable | 0.2 | — |
| Net finance costs | (23.2) | (20.6) |
Net finance costs increased by £2.6 million in 2014, to £23.2 million from £20.6 million in 2013. However 2014 saw a £4.7 million decrease in the underlying finance charge (net bank interest payable), following the capital restructuring in January 2014, and a £0.8 million saving in finance lease interest. These savings were offset by increases in non-underlying finance charges, primarily a £2.5 million adverse swing in the fair value movements on derivatives (which includes the recycling of fair value movements previously reported in the hedge reserve), £3.7 million of net exchange losses (predominantly following the cessation of hedge accounting) and £2.1 million of exceptional finance expenses arising on the capital restructuring.
Based on the year-end drawn debt position the effective interest rate is analysed as follows:
| Facility 'm |
Drawn £'m |
Hedged £'m |
Hedged % |
Bank margin |
Hedged rate |
Floating rate |
Total rate |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UK term loan | £156.0 | 156.0 | 80.0 | 51 | 2.25% | 1.64% | 0.56% | 3.36% |
| UK revolver | £50.0 | — | — | — | 2.25% | — | 0.56% | 2.81% |
| UK revolver – non-utilisation | £50.0 | — | — | — | 1.01% | — | — | 1.01% |
| Euro revolver | €70.0 | 38.6 | 35.5 | 92 | 2.25% | 0.81% | 0.21% | 3.01% |
| Euro revolver – non-utilisation | €21.0 | — | — | — | 1.01% | — | — | 1.01% |
| US private placement 2019 | \$65.6 | 41.0 | 41.0 | 100 | 5.52% | — | — | 5.83% |
| US private placement 2024 | \$47.3 | 29.6 | 29.6 | 100 | 6.29% | — | — | 6.74% |
| Unamortised finance costs (US PP) | — | (0.6) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total | £331.8 | 264.6 | 186.1 | 70 | 4.34% |
The UK term loan of £156 million is fully drawn as at 31 October 2014 and attracts a bank margin of 2.25%. The Group has interest rate hedge agreements in place to June 2018 swapping LIBOR on £80.0 million at an effective rate of 1.64%.
As at 31 October 2014, the UK revolver of £50 million was undrawn. The Group pays a non-utilisation fee of 1.0125% on undrawn balances.
The Euro revolver of €70 million has €49 million (£38.6 million) drawn as at 31 October 2014 and attracts a bank margin of 2.25%. The Group has interest rate hedges in place to June 2018 swapping EURIBOR on €45 million at an effective rate of 0.8085%.
The US private placement notes are fully hedged at 5.83% for the 2019 notes and 6.74% for the 2024 notes.
The hedge arrangements provide cover for 70% of the Group's drawn debt. Net interest payable includes a net gain in respect of the fair value movement on derivatives (including the recycling of fair value movements previously reported in the hedge reserve) of £0.3 million (2013: gain of £2.8 million).
Overall, the Group has an effective interest rate on its borrowings of 4.34% at 31 October 2014, which has reduced from 5.26% since the previous year end, as a result of the capital restructuring in January 2014.
Interest on finance leases was £4.2 million (2013: £5.0 million) and reflects part of the leasehold rental payment. The balance is charged through the gain/loss on investment properties line and contingent rent in the income statement. Overall, the leasehold rent charge for 2014 of £10.3 million is broadly flat compared to £10.2 million in 2013, with the benefit of the 2013 negotiated rent reductions being offset by increased contingent rent.
The Group converted to REIT status on 1 April 2013. Since then, the Group continues to benefit from a zero tax rate on its UK self-storage income. The Group is only liable to UK tax on the profits attributable to the residual business consisting of the sale of ancillary products such as insurance and packaging products.
The Group's French business remains liable to tax on its self-storage and ancillary businesses as it is not entitled to relief under UK REIT rules as its business does not relate to UK property income.
The tax (charge)/credit for the year is analysed below.
| 2014 £'m |
2013 £'m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Underlying current tax | (1.2) | (0.9) |
| Tax relief on settlement of derivatives | 0.3 | — |
| Current tax | (0.9) | (0.9) |
| Exceptional deferred tax credit | — | 63.2 |
| Underlying deferred tax | (2.1) | (2.2) |
| Tax on investment properties movement | (1.8) | (1.9) |
| Tax on exceptional finance costs | 0.2 | — |
| Tax on revaluation of interest rate swaps | 0.3 | — |
| Other | (1.3) | 1.7 |
| Deferred tax | (4.7) | 60.8 |
| Tax (charge)/credit | (5.6) | 59.9 |
The income tax charge in the year is £5.6 million (FY2013: £59.9 million credit). The prior year income tax credit was driven by a deferred tax credit of £63.2 million arising from the release of the UK deferred tax provision following the REIT conversion in April 2013, so has not been repeated in the current year.
In the current year, the underlying current tax charge all relates to the French business and amounted to £1.2 million (2013: £0.9 million). Underlying deferred tax related to the French business and amounted to a charge of £2.1 million (2013: £2.2 million).
The tax impact of the gain on investment properties was a charge of £1.8 million (2013: £1.9 million), and tax credits of £0.2 million and £0.3 million were recognised on exceptional finance costs and the valuation of interest rates swaps in France respectively.
The profit after tax for 2014 was £46.8 million as compared with £108.5 million in 2013, principally due to the exceptional UK deferred tax credit of £63.2 million in 2013 not repeating. Basic EPS was 23.2 pence (2013: 57.8 pence) and diluted EPS was 23.0 pence (2013: 57.3 pence). Management considers cash tax adjusted EPS to be more representative of the underlying EPS performance of the business and this is discussed on page 15.
The Group's full year dividend of 7.45 pence is 29.6% up on the prior year dividend of 5.75 pence. The property income dividend ("PID") element of the full year dividend is 4.80 pence.
Shareholders will be asked to approve the final dividend of 5.30 pence (2013: 3.90 pence) at the Annual General Meeting on 19 March 2015. If approved by shareholders, the final dividend will be payable on 8 April 2015 to shareholders on the register at close of business on 13 March 2015.
Cushman & Wakefield LLP has valued the Group's property portfolio. As at 31 October 2014, the total value of the Group's portfolio was £704.0 million (excluding investment properties under construction of £5.3 million). This represents a decrease of £20.6 million or 2.8% compared with the £724.6 million valuation as at 31 October 2013. A reconciliation of the movement is set out below:
| Value at 31 October 2014 | 527.0 | 177.0 | 704.0 | 224.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revaluation | 24.0 | 5.3 | 29.3 | 6.6 |
| Purchase of freehold | — | 2.9 | 2.9 | 3.6 |
| Disposals | (41.6) | — | (41.6) | — |
| Additions | 2.4 | 1.0 | 3.4 | 1.3 |
| Currency translation movement | — | (14.6) | (14.6) | — |
| Value as at 1 November 2013 | 542.2 | 182.4 | 724.6 | 213.0 |
| UK £'m |
France £'m |
Total £'m |
France €'m |
The exchange rate at 31 October 2014 was €1.27:£1 compared to €1.17:£1 at 31 October 2013. This movement in the foreign exchange rate has resulted in a £14.6 million adverse currency translation movement in the year. This has impacted the net asset value ("NAV") but had no impact on the loan to value ("LTV") covenant as the assets in Paris are tested in Euro.
The value of the UK property portfolio has reduced by £15.2 million compared with 31 October 2013. A £24.0 million gain arose on the 31 October 2014 revaluation of the UK portfolio, due to improving trading metrics and performance; however, the £41.6 million disposals of the Whitechapel store and the vacant former Southend site during the year resulted in the net reduction in value.
In France, the freehold of the Group's existing St Denis store in Paris was acquired for €3.6 million. The French property valuation increased by €6.6 million in the year reflecting improving operating metrics in the business.
The Group's freehold exit yield for the valuation at 31 October 2014 was 7.73%, unchanged from 31 October 2013.
The weighted average annual discount rate for the whole portfolio has reduced slightly from 11.91% at 31 October 2013 to 11.82% at 31 October 2014.
The Company's pipeline of expansion stores is valued at £5.3 million as at 31 October 2014, a £0.3 million decrease on the 2013 valuation of £5.6 million.
The adjusted EPRA NAV per share was 217.9 pence at 31 October 2014, up 3.6% on 31 October 2013, with the benefit of a £62.1 million increase in net assets being partly offset by the additional shares in issue following the placing of 18.6 million shares in February 2014.
The Group's borrowings comprise bank borrowing facilities, made up of a UK term loan and revolving facilities in the UK and France, as well as a US private placement.
Net debt (including finance leases and cash) stood at £300.3 million at 31 October 2014, a reduction of £82.5 million from the 2013 position of £382.8 million. Total capital (net debt plus equity) reduced from £728.7 million at 31 October 2013 to £708.3 million at 31 October 2014. The net impact is that the gearing ratio has moved from 53% to 42% in the year.
Management also measures gearing with reference to its loan to value (LTV) ratio defined as gross debt (excluding finance leases) as a proportion of the valuation of investment properties and investment properties under construction (excluding finance leases). At 31 October 2014 the Group LTV ratio was 37% as compared to 47% at 31 October 2013. Management considers that a Group LTV of circa 40% represents an appropriate medium-term capital structure objective.
The reduction in Group LTV since 31 October 2013 was principally a result of the above reduction in net debt. During the year the Group sold its Whitechapel property for net proceeds of £40.5 million. At the 31 October 2013 year end, the Whitechapel property had been valued within investment properties at £40.5 million. The Group used the disposal proceeds to pay down debt under the existing UK term facility.
Following the de-leveraging described above, the Group extended its existing bank facilities from June 2016 to June 2018. As a result, the £230 million UK term loan facility was reduced to £181.2 million, and the UK revolver was increased to £50 million, which was undrawn as at 31 October 2014. The Euro revolver remains at €70 million, of which €49 million had been drawn as at 31 October 2014, and the US private placement reduced from \$115 million to \$113 million.
As a result of the bank refinancing, the margin ratchet was reduced by 0.25% to a range of 2.25% to 3.25%, based on the interest cover ratio. The initial margin payable following the refinancing was 2.75%, compared with the margin paid through most of 2013 of 3.25%, and by the year end this had reduced further to 2.25%. Repayments of £5 million will be made on the UK term facility every six months commencing on 31 October 2015, with the balance due on expiry in June 2018.
Subsequent to the bank refinancing, the Group raised net proceeds of £31.6 million by way of a successful share placing. £25.2 million of these proceeds were used to reduce the UK term loan further, to £156 million.
The UK bank facilities and the US private placement share interest cover and LTV covenants. As part of the amendment and extension of the bank facilities the interest cover requirement commences at a level of EBITDA:interest of 2.0:1. In July 2015 this will increase to 2.2:1 and in July 2016 the covenant ratchets to 2.4:1 where it remains until the end of the facilities. The French LTV covenant remains at 60% throughout the life of the facility and the UK LTV covenant reduces from 62.5% to 60.0% in April 2015 where it remains until the end of the facilities.
There is no amortisation on the US private placement debt of \$113 million. \$66 million was issued at 5.52% (swapped to 5.83%) with 2019 maturity and \$47 million was issued at 6.29% (swapped to 6.74%) with 2024 maturity.
Borrowings under the existing bank facilities are subject to certain financial covenants and the Group is in compliance with its covenants at 31 October 2014 and, based on forecast projections, is expected to be in compliance for a period in excess of twelve months from the date of this report.
The table below sets out the cash flow of the business in 2014 and 2013.
| 2014 £'m |
2013 £'m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Underlying EBITDA | 53.0 | 50.8 |
| Working capital/exceptionals/other | 0.8 | 1.5 |
| Operating cash inflow | 53.8 | 52.3 |
| Capital expenditure – investment properties | (3.3) | (4.7) |
| Capital expenditure – purchase of freehold | (2.9) | — |
| Capital expenditure – property, plant and equipment | (0.2) | (0.2) |
| Capital Goods Scheme receipt | 1.8 | 3.1 |
| Proceeds from disposal – investment properties | 41.6 | — |
| Net inflow from investing activities | 37.0 | (1.8) |
| Interest payments | (15.1) | (17.5) |
| Leasehold rent payments | (10.3) | (10.2) |
| Tax payments | (1.9) | (0.1) |
| Free cash flow (before dividends and financing activities) | 63.5 | 22.7 |
| Dividends paid | (12.5) | (10.6) |
| Issue of share capital | 31.8 | — |
| Net repayment of borrowings | (75.3) | (3.4) |
| Debt issuance costs | (2.1) | — |
| Hedge breakage costs | (4.9) | — |
| Net cash flow from financing activities | (63.0) | (14.0) |
| Net increase in cash | 0.5 | 8.7 |
Operating cash flow increased by £1.5 million in the year, primarily due to the £2.2 million improvement in underlying EBITDA. The movement in working capital, exceptional costs and other in the year primarily reflects adjustments to accruals (for example relating to rent reviews) and the impact of the movement in exchange rates.
The £37.0 million cash inflow from investing activities predominantly reflects the receipt of sales proceeds totalling £41.6 million from the Whitechapel store and the vacant former Southend site. No new stores were opened in the period, however, the Group acquired the freehold of its existing St Denis store in Paris for €3.6 million. In addition the Group received £1.8 million (2013: £3.1 million) under the Capital Goods Scheme.
Interest payments have reduced by £2.4 million to £15.1 million (2013: £17.5 million) following the capital restructuring in January 2014.
As a result of the above, free cash flow increased from £22.7 million in 2013 to £63.5 million in 2014.
There were significant movements in cash flows from financing activities in the period, including the net repayment of borrowings of £75.3 million (2013: £3.4 million) and costs relating to refinancing and replacement of hedging instruments of £7.0 million (2013: £nil), along with dividend payments totalling £12.5 million (2013: £10.6 million), which were funded by a combination of the above free cash flow and issues of share capital totalling £31.8 million (primarily the January 2014 share placing, which generated net proceeds of £31.6 million).
Chief Financial Officer 21 January 2015
| Overview | |||
|---|---|---|---|
At Safestore we strive to deliver an engaging CR programme that is supportive of our principal commitments to our four stakeholder groups and is pivotal in how we progress our business.
We have set out our policy and commitments for each of these groups below.
We continually aspire to improve on our CR standards and commitments and consider this fundamental to our goal to deliver the highest standards of customer satisfaction, whilst making good business sense.
As we have progressed through the financial year our CR strategy has been fully supported by the Board. This ensures that our approach supports both our wider purpose statement and Safestore's values and strategic priorities.
Our Executive Team takes ownership for ensuring that our plan is delivered throughout the business. With the support of the Senior Management Team our plan is far reaching, involving Head Office together with regional and store colleagues. By taking this approach we are able to ensure that each and every member of the team is able to participate with and influence how we develop our CR plan for the future delivering maximum stakeholder value.
We are committed to conducting our business activities so as to enhance the value of the Company and to optimise shareholder and investor value. We do this by providing easily accessible and clear information which is in the interest of our shareholders, employees, customers, suppliers and creditors. Our Board of Directors have been entrusted with the responsibility of achieving this objective in addition to managing policies and decisions, taking into account stakeholder needs whilst balancing our CR objectives.
We will:
support the evolution of the broader self-storage sector and actively participate in industry forums and conferences to share best practice;
be an active member of the self-storage association; and
In 2013, we rolled out Feefo, the customer rating system for businesses that guarantees 100% genuine feedback. Feefo polls feedback from actual Safestore customers about their experiences, meaning that feedback is a complete and true representation of consumer opinion. All of our stores across the country have a rating, which means customers can view ratings for that individual store. We take great pride in our staff around the country who we believe deliver the best possible customer experience and it is our mission to continually improve our services as our customers are at the heart of everything we do. Feefo, has awarded Safestore Gold Trusted Status, this is a result of achieving a 97% Feefo Service Rating in 2013/2014 where customers rated Safestore as either "Excellent" or "Good".
Our colleagues play a pivotal role in providing the best solution for our customers and we are passionate in providing a diverse CR programme that ensures they are truly placed at the heart of our business. This helps our colleagues in achieving their goals and is underpinned by our commitment to attract and retain the very best talent to shape our future success.
We provide a healthy and safe environment for our people, customers, suppliers and contractors. Safestore always comply with current legislation and endeavour to continuously exceed legal requirements and local regulations by:
As an "Investors in People" organisation since 2003 our aim is to be an employer of choice and we passionately believe that our continual success is dependent in our highly motivated and well trained colleagues. We are delighted that in FY2014 our people have participated in over 15,000 hours of training time.
This training consisted of:
40 colleagues were successfully promoted to more senior positions.
Here at Safestore, we are committed to being a responsible business in how we contribute to our local communities. With nearly 100 stores nationwide, we believe it is important for our colleagues to recognise how our activities can have an impact on those around us. For this reason, we look to seek out practical and creative solutions by working with and supporting a number of charitable causes.
We have continued to:
Over the last five years, Safestore has helped our "Charity of the Year", Scope, save money by providing free storage which gives the charity space for its archives as well as space to store and sort through stock donations for sale in its local retail outlets.
In addition to the provision of free storage space we are delighted to support Scope with our colleagues, our customers and the wider community who took part in a two-week long "Dash to Donate" campaign earlier this year where bags of donated stock, including clothing, toys and bric-a-brac, were collected in our stores for Scope's local charity shops.
"We were delighted to partner with Safestore again in 2014. As well as donating storage worth thousands of pounds they took part in a very successful Dash to Donate event for the fifth year running, generating much-needed stock for our charity shops. In addition to this event Safestore staff took part in fundraising activities including the Virgin Money London Marathon with all funds raised going to support disabled people and their families.
Scope provides support, advice and information for more than 250,000 disabled people and their family members every year. Among other things, we play a vital role in supporting families when they first receive a diagnosis and during a child's crucial early years. Our partnership with Safestore enables us to reach even more of these families. We would like to thank Safestore for its valuable support this year and we look forward to working with Safestore again in 2015."
Another charity Safestore are proud to support is Hands on London. For the third year running we participated in its Wrap Up London campaign which encourages Londoners to donate a coat to charity. Safestore also offers Hands on London free storage space to support the collection, storage and sorting of the coats prior to distribution to shelters, refuges and other charities.
"Safestore provides absolutely invaluable support to the Wrap Up London campaign, each year helping us to collect, store, sort and distribute thousands of coats to those in need across the capital.
Hugely important is the storage space provided free of charge at four locations around the city, without which we could not run the campaign, but in addition the friendly, helpful staff at each store take donations from people dropping in, publicise the event, and give our volunteers lots of encouragement during the long days of sorting coats.
We genuinely feel that Safestore loves Wrap Up London as much as we do at Hands on London do and we know each year that we'll get incredible support with the campaign."
Our network of Charity Champions continues to help drive colleague engagement in fundraising and awareness raising activities. In each region, the Charity Champion helps to organise, support and promote local fundraising and awareness activities for staff at local stores. As well as helping to engage with the local community, the Charity Champions also help support centrally run fundraising initiatives.
"Working with local charities helps foster a positive engagement with the community, whilst helping build a positive brand awareness. We are also hoping to engage our teams to work together for a common cause and therefore improve team spirit."
We are also delighted to have made several other positive contributions to local charities nationwide such as offering storage to Hanworth Girl Guides, box donations to Trinity Homeless Project's Big Sleep Out event and food collections for Basildon Foodbank. This all contributes to our working together culture.
Sustainable business practice continues to be key to our agenda and we remain focused on delivering a positive net impact on the environment from our business activities wherever practical.
When carrying out our business activities Safestore endeavours to:
We carefully select packaging partners who share our values and goals to reduce the unnecessary breakdown of our natural climate. An example of this is our packaging supplier (Ecopac) whose operation is 100% solar powered, operating as part of the Westcott Venture Park sustainable energy project.
This year we used 264 tonnes of recycled paper and through the provision of a recycled box range, cardboard recycling points and a box for life scheme, we have saved approximately 4,488 trees from being unnecessarily felled.
We consider our environmental responsibilities to extend beyond our box range and we continue to look at all aspects of our packaging range seeking green alternatives wherever this is commercially practical.
This report was undertaken for the UK mandatory GHG reporting legislation, which requires Safestore Holdings plc to report its GHG emissions for the latest financial year. Trucost has been commissioned for a second year to assess our environmental data: stationary energy use, GHG emissions, waste generation and water use. The data: collected covers all of the Company's sites in the UK and in France.
We collected the following raw data: stationary energy use, GHG emissions, waste generation and water use. The Company does not have any refrigerant leakage.
For the purposes of this report, covering the 2013/14 financial year, Trucost concentrated on GHG emissions, waste generation and water use as the key performance indicators ("KPIs") of the Group.
The Greenhouse Gas Protocol differentiates between direct and indirect emissions using a classification system across three different scopes:
Table 1 displays Safestore Holdings plc's stationary energy use, business travel mileage, waste generation and water use for the 2013/14 financial year, with a comparison to the previous financial year.
| Item | Units | 2013 | 2014 | % change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natural gas | kWh | 3,644,334 | 3,033,972 | -17% |
| Electricity | kWh | 19,247,053 19,501,950 | 1% | |
| Diesel | miles | 189,025 | 450,052 | 138% |
| Recycling | tonnes | 699 | 673 | -4% |
| Energy from waste | tonnes | 227 | 350 | 54% |
| Landfill | tonnes | 368 | 322 | -12% |
| Purchased water | m3 | 26,169 | 26,406 | 1% |
Safestore Holdings plc's operations used 22,535,922 kWh of energy in 2013/14, which is a 2% reduction from the previous year. The natural gas consumption decreased by 17%; however, the vast majority of energy used was electricity. In addition, business vehicles travelled 450,052 miles, a significant increase on the previous financial year. This was because Safestore Holdings plc began to include employee-owned vehicles where the Company paid the mileage, and also the number of regional managers using company vehicles increased by 20%. Safestore Holdings plc generated 1,345 tonnes of waste in 2013/14, of which 50% was recycled. Water use was 26,406 m3 , which is very similar to the previous year.
Our Company's disclosure for the 2013/14 financial year, in accordance with this legislation, is stated in table 2:
| Data point | Units | Quantity |
|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 | tonnes CO2 e |
696 |
| Scope 2 | tonnes CO2 e |
8,128 |
| Scope 1+2 intensity | tonnes CO2 e/floor space (thousand sq ft) |
1.1 |
Data compiled by Trucost using data received from Safestore Holdings plc.
We used the Greenhouse Gas Protocol methodology for compiling its GHG data and included the following material GHGs: CO2 , N2 O and CH4 . We used the following emission conversion factor sources:
Our GHG emissions for 2013/14 covered 100% of floor space and the Company is looking for continuous improvement in its data clarity and completeness in future years. Our Scope 1+2 intensity has increased slightly from 1.0 tonnes CO2 e in 2012/13.
The Board consistently challenges processes, plans and actions in order to promote continuous and sustained improvement across the business.
A S Lewis Non-Executive Chairman
The Board of Safestore believes that corporate governance is important in ensuring its effectiveness. It has an established framework of policies and processes that are regularly reviewed against developments in the legislative, regulatory and governance landscape.
This governance report comprises the following sections:
The Board's main role is to work with the executive team, providing support and advice to complement and enhance the work undertaken. The Board consistently challenges processes, plans and actions in order to promote continuous and sustained improvement across the business.
The Group recognises the importance of, and is committed to, high standards of corporate governance. These are set out in the UK Corporate Governance Code issued by the Financial Reporting Council in September 2012 (the "Code") which is the version of the Code which applies to the Company for its 2014 financial year. The Board is accountable to the Company's shareholders for good governance and this report describes how the Board has applied the main principles of good governance set out in the Code during the year under review. Throughout the year ended 31 October 2014, the Company has complied with the main principles of the Code (as they apply to a smaller company outside the FTSE 350).
Non-Executive Chairman 21 January 2015
Alan Lewis Non-Executive Chairman
Alan Lewis joined the Group in June 2009 as a non-executive director and was appointed chairman in January 2014. He is also non-executive chairman of Porterbrook, a major train leasing Rosco, and chairman of Amplan, a private property development and investment business. He is also an ambassador for Leaders Quest, a social enterprise that develops leaders from diverse backgrounds.
After five years in manufacturing with RTZ and Black & Decker he spent 30 years in the private equity industry. Firstly with 3i, then from 1991 to 2011 with Bridgepoint, where he was a founding partner. Mr Lewis is a graduate of Liverpool University and holds an MBA from Manchester Business School.
Frederic Vecchioli Chief Executive Officer
Frederic Vecchioli is a founding director of our French business and has overseen its growth to 24 stores in Paris operating under the "Une Pièce En Plus" brand. He joined the Group as President and Head of French Operations following the Mentmore acquisition in 2004. Mr Vecchioli became Chief Executive Officer of the Group in September 2013. He has a Master of Finance from the University of Paris Dauphine.
Andy Jones Chief Financial Officer
Andy Jones joined the Group in May 2013 as Chief Financial Officer. Andy's previous role was director of group finance at Worldpay Limited prior to which he held the positions of director of finance and investor relations at TUI Travel PLC and chief financial officer of Virgin Entertainment Group in the US. Andy began his career at Ernst and Young where he qualified as a Chartered Accountant in 1992. Andy is a graduate of the University of Birmingham.
Adrian Martin Senior Independent Director
Adrian Martin joined the Group in 2008 as a Non-Executive Director and was Chairman of the Audit Committee until March 2014. He is currently chairman of Morgan Sindall Group plc, and a non-executive director of M&C Saatchi plc and H R Owen plc. Previously he was managing partner at BDO Stoy Hayward and chief executive at the law firm Reynolds Porter Chamberlain LLP. Adrian will be retiring from the Board at the next Annual General Meeting in March 2015.
Joanne Kenrick Non-Executive Director
Joanne Kenrick joined the Group in October 2014 as a Non-Executive Director. She is currently marketing director at Homebase, a subsidiary of Home Retail Group plc, and a non-executive director of Principality Building Society where she is also a member of the customer and conduct and nominations committees. Previously, Jo was chief executive officer of Start, a Prince of Wales charity. She was marketing and customer proposition director at B&Q and marketing director at Camelot Group plc. Jo has a law degree and started her career at Mars Confectionery and PepsiCo.
Ian Krieger Non-Executive Director
Ian Krieger joined the Group in October 2013 as a Non-Executive Director. He is senior independent director and chairman of the audit committee of Premier Foods plc, and a non-executive director of Capital & Regional plc. He is a director of Anthony Nolan (blood cancer charity) where he is chairman of the audit committee and he is also a trustee and chairman of the finance committee of the Nuffield Trust. Previously Ian was a senior partner and vice-chairman at Deloitte until his retirement in 2012. During his 40 year career at Arthur Andersen and since 2002 at Deloitte, his responsibilities have included heading the corporate finance practice, the London corporate audit division and the private equity practice. Ian has significant boardroom experience and has worked with a wide variety of companies throughout his career.
Keith Edelman Non-Executive Director
Keith Edelman joined the Group in September 2009 as a Non-Executive Director and was appointed Chairman of the Remuneration Committee in March 2010. He is currently chairman of Goals Soccer Centres Plc, the senior independent director of Supergroup Plc and non-executive director of the Olympic Park Legacy. Prior to this, he was managing director of Arsenal Holdings Plc, chief executive of Storehouse Plc, managing director of Carlton Communications Plc and corporate planning director of Ladbroke Plc.
The Code recommends that the Board should include a balance of Executive and Non-Executive Directors, such that no individual or small group of individuals can dominate the Board's decision making. It further recommends that at least half of the Board, excluding the Chairman, should comprise Non-Executive Directors determined by the Board to be independent and that one Non-Executive Director should be nominated as the Senior Independent Director.
The Company currently has seven Directors, which include the Chairman, two Executive Directors and four independent Non-Executive Directors. As a result, the Directors consider that there is a satisfactory balance of decision making power on the Board.
The Board is aware of the other commitments of its Directors and is satisfied that these do not conflict with their duties as Non-Executive Directors of the Company. The Executive Directors do not hold any executive or non-executive directorships in other companies.
There is a clear division of responsibilities between the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Adrian Martin, deemed to be independent upon his appointment in 2008, is the Senior Independent Director. Keith Edelman was deemed to be independent upon his appointment in 2009. Alan Lewis was deemed to be independent from January 2011 following the disposal by Bridgepoint of its major shareholding in the Company. Ian Krieger was deemed to be independent upon his appointment in October 2013. Joanne Kenrick was deemed to be independent upon her appointment in October 2014.
A clear division of responsibility at the head of the Group is established, agreed in writing and approved by the Board. The Chairman is responsible for the management of the Board and for aspects of external relations, while the Chief Executive Officer has overall responsibility for the management of the Group's businesses and implementation of the strategy approved by the Board.
| Chairman | 1 |
|---|---|
| Executive Directors | 2 |
| Independent Non-Executive Directors | 4 |
The statement of the division of responsibilities between the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer is available on the Group's website at www.safestore.com.
Appropriate directors' and officers' insurance cover is arranged by the Group through its insurance brokers and is reviewed annually.
The Board normally schedules at least eight meetings throughout the year, including an extended strategy review. Additional meetings are held as and when required.
It has a formal schedule of matters specifically reserved for its decision, which includes (amongst other things) the approval of strategic plans, annual budgets, interim and full year preliminary results announcements and financial statements and internal control and risk analysis.
Implementation of agreed plans, budgets and projects in pursuit of the Group's strategy and the actual operation of the Group's system of internal control and risk management are delegated to management.
The Directors are entitled to take independent legal advice if they consider it appropriate and, if the Board is informed in advance, the cost of the advice will be reimbursed by the Group.
In the event that a Non‑Executive Director deems it appropriate, upon resignation, to provide a written statement to the Chairman, this would be circulated to the Board.
Board papers are normally issued one week before Board meetings and the quality of content is reviewed continually.
Attendance at meetings of the individual Directors at the Board and for the members of the Committees that they were eligible to attend is shown in the table below:
| Director | Board | Audit Committee |
Nomination Committee |
Remuneration Committee |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alan Lewis | 8/8 | — | 2/2 | 1/1 |
| Frederic Vecchioli | 8/8 | — | — | — |
| Andy Jones | 8/8 | — | — | — |
| Adrian Martin | 7/8 | 3/3 | 2/2 | — |
| Keith Edelman | 8/8 | 3/3 | 2/2 | 2/2 |
| Ian Krieger | 8/8 | 3/3 | 2/2 | 2/2 |
| Joanne Kenrick | — | — | — | — |
| Richard Grainger | 1/1 | — | 1/1 | 1/1 |
Implementation of agreed plans, budgets and projects in pursuit of the Group's strategy and the actual operation of the Group's system of internal control and risk management are delegated to the Executive Directors.
The services of the Company Secretary are available to all members of the Board. Board minutes are circulated to all Board members. There is also regular informal contact between Executive and Non-Executive Directors to deal with important matters that arise between scheduled Board meetings. A separate meeting for Non-Executive Directors only is held at least once in every year.
The Board has three principal committees, each of whose terms of reference are available from the Investor Relations page of the Group's website at www.safestore.com.
All committees and all Directors have the authority to seek information from any Group Director or employee and to obtain professional advice.
The Nomination Committee comprises Alan Lewis (Chairman), Adrian Martin, Keith Edelman, Ian Krieger and Joanne Kenrick.
The Audit Committee comprises Ian Krieger (Chairman), Adrian Martin, Keith Edelman and Joanne Kenrick.
The Remuneration Committee comprises Keith Edelman (Chairman), Ian Krieger and Joanne Kenrick. Richard Grainger was a member of the committee until his retirement in December 2013. Alan Lewis stepped down from the committee in January 2014.
During the year, an evaluation of the performance of the Board, its committees, the individual Directors and the Chairman was conducted. The scope of the Board and committee evaluation process was agreed with the Chairman and undertaken internally by the Company Secretary.
Directors completed detailed written questionnaires covering a number of key areas including strategy, succession planning, Board size and composition, risk management and the relationship between the Board and management. The results of the reviews were then considered by the Chairman and discussed by the Board as a whole.
The review also involved an assessment by the Chairman of individual Directors' own performance. The Chairman's own performance was assessed by the Senior Independent Director.
The anonymity of respondents was ensured in order to promote the open and frank exchange of views. A report was produced mapping the performance of the Board which addressed the following areas:
The content for any subsequent evaluation will be designed to build upon insights gained in the previous exercise to ensure that the recommendations agreed in the review have been implemented and that year-on-year progress is measured. It is intended to hold externally facilitated face-to-face interviews every three years (as was done last year).
Every decision to appoint further Directors to the Board is taken by the entire Board in a formal meeting based on a recommendation from the Nomination Committee. The Nomination Committee consults with financial and legal advisers and uses the services of external recruitment specialists. New members of the Board are provided with initial and ongoing training appropriate to individual needs in respect of their role and duties as directors of a listed company.
The service agreements of the Executive Directors and the letters of appointment of the Non-Executive Directors are available for inspection at the registered office of the Company during normal business hours, including the 15 minutes immediately prior to the AGM. The letters of appointment for Non-Executive Directors are in line with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code relating to expected time commitment.
The Company's Articles of Association provide that one-third of the Directors retire by rotation each year and that each Director will seek re-election by the shareholders at the AGM at least once every three years. Additionally, new Directors are subject to election by shareholders at the first opportunity after their appointment. All Directors have offered to stand for re-election at the 2015 AGM and their details are given in the Notice of Annual General Meeting.
The Group places a great deal of importance on communication with its shareholders and maintains a dialogue with them through investor relations programmes. These include formal presentations of the full year and interim results and meetings with institutional investors and analysts as required. To ensure all Board members share a good understanding of the views of major shareholders about the Group, there is a formal process whereby the Board reviews announcements and reports prior to public distribution and are sent summaries of institutional investor comments following meetings on the full year and interim results. The Non-Executive Directors are available to meet major shareholders when requested.
The Board considers the Annual Report and financial statements and the AGM to be the primary vehicles for communication with private investors. Resolutions are proposed on each substantially separate issue and the Company indicates the level of proxy voting lodged in respect of each. The AGM gives all shareholders who are able to attend (especially private shareholders) the opportunity to hear about the general development of the business. It also provides an opportunity for shareholders to ask questions of the full Board of Directors, including the Chairmen of the Audit, Nomination and Remuneration Committees.
The Directors are responsible for the Group's system of operational control and risk management. During the year the Group undertook regular reviews of the formal risk assessment. Risk management remains an ongoing programme within the Group and is formally considered at operational meetings as well as at meetings of the Board.
The UK Corporate Governance Code requires that, at least annually, Directors review the effectiveness of the Group's internal controls including financial, operational and compliance controls and risk management systems. The Board confirms that it carried out a review of the effectiveness of the system of internal control which operated within the Group during the financial year in accordance with the UK Corporate Governance Code. The Board places considerable importance on maintaining a strong control environment but recognises that such systems are designed to manage rather than eliminate risk, providing reasonable but not absolute assurance against material misstatement or loss.
Key features of the Group's systems of internal control include:
The Directors believe that the system of internal control is appropriate for the Group. The Group currently employs a risk manager supported by two store auditors who are responsible for reviewing operational and financial control at store level. The risk manager reports to the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.
A summary of the principal risks and uncertainties within the business is set out on pages 12 to 14.
The Nomination Committee (the "Committee") comprises:
Alan Lewis succeeded Richard Grainger as Chairman upon his retirement on 31 December 2013. Keith Edelman and Ian Krieger were appointed members of the committee in December 2013. Joanne Kenrick was appointed a member when she joined the Board in October 2014.
The Nomination Committee is appointed by the Board and it comprises the Chairman of the Board and all of the Non-Executive Directors. The Chairman does not chair or attend when the committee is considering matters relating to his position, in which circumstances, the committee is chaired by an independent Non-Executive Director, usually the Senior Independent Director.
The committee keeps the composition of the Board under review, makes recommendations on its membership and monitors succession planning for Directors. It also evaluates Board and committee performance. The committee adopts a formal, rigorous and transparent procedure for the appointment of new Directors to the Board.
The Board comprises two Executive Directors complemented by Non-Executive Directors who have wide business experience and skills as well as a detailed understanding of the Group's philosophy and strategy. It is a key responsibility of the committee to advise the Board on succession planning. The committee ensures that future changes in the Board's membership are anticipated and properly managed, and that in the event of unforeseen changes, management and oversight of the Group's business and long-term strategy will not be disrupted. The committee also addresses continuity in, and development of, the Executive Management Team below Board level.
All aspects of diversity are considered at every level of recruitment. All appointments to the Board are made on merit. The committee seeks a Board composition with the right balance of skills and diversity to meet the demands of the business. The Board does not consider that quotas are appropriate for its representation and has therefore chosen not to set targets.
Specialist recruitment consultants were engaged to undertake a search and selection process for an additional Non-Executive Director. A short-list of candidates was prepared and discussed by the Committee which recommended to the Board that Joanne Kenrick should be appointed as a Non-Executive Director. The Board agreed with this recommendation and Joanne Kenrick joined the Board in October 2014.
During the year, the Committee considered the performance of the Chief Executive Officer, appointed in September 2013 and the Chief Financial Officer, appointed in May 2013.
Ian Krieger succeeded Adrian Martin as Chairman of the Audit Committee following the 2014 AGM. Adrian Martin has signified his willingness to continue as Senior Independent Director until his planned retirement at the 2015 AGM.
The Board undertook the annual evaluation of the performance of the Board and its committees seeking to identify areas where performance and procedures might be improved. Further details are provided in the corporate governance section of this report.
Joanne Kenrick was appointed to the Board after the 2014 AGM.
All Directors will stand for re-election at the 2015 AGM. Following the annual Board performance reviews of individual Directors, as applicable, the Chairman considers:
The Board, on the advice of the Committee, therefore recommends the re-election of each Director standing for re-election. Full biographical details of each Director are available on pages 29 to 31.
The full terms of reference of the Nomination Committee are available on the Group's website at www.safestore.com.
This report was approved by the Nomination Committee for release on 22 January 2015 and signed on its behalf by:
Chairman of the Nomination Committee
Ian Krieger succeeded Adrian Martin as Chairman of the committee following the 2014 Annual General Meeting.
The primary function of the committee is to assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities. This includes reviewing the financial reports and other financial information before publication. In addition, the committee also reviews the systems of internal controls on a continuing basis, with respect to finance, accounting, risk management, compliance, fraud and audit that management and the Board have established.
The committee has responsibility for the financial reporting processes, along with reviewing the roles and effectiveness of both the internal store assurance team and the external auditors. The ultimate responsibility for reviewing and approving the annual and other accounts remains with the Board.
The key terms set out that the Audit Committee will:
The Board, as a whole, including the Audit Committee members, considers that the nature and extent of Safestore's risk management framework and the risk profile is acceptable in order to achieve the Company's strategic objectives. As a result, it is considered that the Board has fulfilled its obligations under the Code.
Safestore's internal controls, along with its design and operating effectiveness, are subject to annual review by the Audit Committee through reports received from management, along with those from the external auditors. Further details of risk management and internal control are set out on pages 12 to 14.
The Audit Committee has oversight responsibilities for the store assurance team which is responsible for reviewing operational and financial controls at store level. The Group does not have a separate internal audit function and the Board periodically reviews the requirement for establishing one. Upon the recommendation of the Audit Committee, an externally facilitated review of the control environment was commissioned for all aspects of financial controls and business risks. Following completion of this project in early 2014, the Audit Committee reviewed the findings and determined that a separate internal audit function is not deemed necessary. It was agreed that a rolling programme of work will continue to be commissioned periodically until the Audit Committee determines that it is appropriate for the Group to establish an internal audit function.
During the year the Audit Committee's business has included the following items:
The committee assesses whether suitable accounting policies have been adopted and whether management has made appropriate estimates and judgements. The committee reviews accounting papers prepared by management which provide details on the main financial reporting judgements.
The committee also reviews reports by the external auditors on the full year and half year results which highlight any issues with respect to the work undertaken on the year-end audit and half-year review.
The committee pays particular attention to matters it considers to be important by virtue of their impact on the Group's results and remuneration, and particularly those which involve a high level of complexity, judgement or estimation by management.
Property valuations – The key area of judgement that the committee considered in reviewing the financial statements was the valuation of the investment property portfolio. Whilst this is conducted by independent external valuers, it is one of the key components of the financial results and is inherently complex and subject to a high degree of judgement. As well as detailed management procedures and reviews of the process, members of the committee met the Group's valuers to discuss the valuations, review the key judgements and discussed whether there were any significant disagreements with management. The committee reviewed and challenged the assumptions with the valuers in order to agree and conclude on the appropriateness of the assumptions applied. The Board considered the valuation in detail at its meeting to approve the financial statements.
Revenue recognition – The committee considered the risks of fraud and was content that there were no issues arising.
Financial statements – The committee considered and was satisfied with management's presentation of the financial statements.
Management confirmed to the committee that it was not aware of any material misstatements and the auditors confirmed that they had found no material misstatements during the course of their work. The committee is satisfied that the judgements made by management are reasonable and that appropriate disclosures have been included in the accounts.
After reviewing the reports from management and following its discussions with the valuers and auditors, the committee is satisfied that the financial statements appropriately address the critical judgements and key estimates, both in respect of the amounts reported and the disclosures. The committee is also satisfied that the processes used for determining the value of the assets and liabilities have been appropriately reviewed, challenged and are sufficiently robust.
At the request of the Board, the committee also considered whether the Annual Report and Accounts was fair, balanced and understandable and whether it provided the necessary information for shareholders to assess the Company's performance, business model and strategy. The committee is satisfied that, taken as a whole, the Annual Report and Accounts is fair, balanced and understandable. In reaching this conclusion, the committee considered the overall review and confirmation process around the Annual Report and Accounts. The committee was provided with, and commented on, a draft copy of the Annual Report and Accounts. In carrying out the above processes, key considerations included ensuring that there was consistency between the accounts and the narrative provided in the front half of the Annual Report, and that the programme of corporate reporting reviews focused on the balance between the reporting of weaknesses, difficulties and challenges, as well as successes, in an open and honest manner.
During the year the committee received and reviewed audit plans and reports from the external auditors. It is standard practice for the external auditors to meet privately with the Audit Committee without any member of management or the Executive Directors being present at each Audit Committee meeting. The Audit Committee has responsibility for making a recommendation on the appointment, re-appointment and removal of the external auditors. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP were re-appointed auditors of the Group at the Annual General Meeting held in March 2014. Following an audit tender, Deloitte LLP were appointed auditors for the Group in September 2014.
The Audit Committee had noted the changes to the Code, the recent findings of the Competition Commission and the guidance for audit committees issued by the Financial Reporting Council, each in the context of tendering for the external audit contract. The Company's external audit was tendered in mid-2014 and the big four firms were invited to participate. KPMG LLP and Deloitte LLP completed the tender process. After due consideration of the tender proposals and presentations to the committee it was decided that Deloitte LLP be recommended for appointment. The Board ratified the appointment of Deloitte LLP as auditors in September 2014. There are no contractual obligations that restrict the choice of external auditors.
To assess the effectiveness of the external audit process, the auditors are asked on an annual basis to articulate the steps that they have taken to ensure objectivity and independence, including where the auditor provides non-audit services. The committee monitors the auditors' performance, behaviour and effectiveness during the exercise of their duties, which informs the Audit Committee's decision to recommend reappointment on an annual basis.
The Audit Committee's terms of reference set out that it is responsible for the formal policy on the award of non-audit work to the auditors. In order to preserve auditor objectivity and independence, the external auditors are not asked to provide consulting or advisory services unless this is in the best interests of the Company. In the current financial year, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP provided taxation services of £0.1 million until their resignation as auditors in September 2014. Prior to their appointment as auditors in September 2014, Deloitte LLP provided property advisory and consulting services of £0.4 million primarily relating to the disposal of the Whitechapel property in November 2013. The committee has formalised procedures for the approval of non-audit services which stipulate the services for which the auditors will not be used. The policy also stipulates projects where the auditors may be used subject to certain conditions and pre-approval requirements. A report of all audit and non-audit fees payable to the external auditors is provided to the committee twice a year, including both actual fees for the year to date and a forecast for the full year, analysed by project and into pre-defined categories. It was determined that the nature of the work would not impact auditor objectivity and independence given the safeguards in place.
This report was approved by the Audit Committee for release on 22 January 2015 and signed on its behalf by:
I S Krieger Chairman of the Audit Committee
Keith Edelman Chairman of the Remuneration Committee
This report sets out the remuneration policy for the Directors of Safestore Holdings plc and discloses amounts paid to them over the course of the financial year. This is comprised of the following three sections:
The Annual statement and Annual report on remuneration will be subject to an advisory shareholder vote at the forthcoming 2015 AGM. No changes are being made to the Directors' remuneration policy.
The Company and Executive Team have performed well in the year under review. As a result, Executive Directors will receive annual bonus payments of 76% of salary for the year ended 31 October 2014 and while the 2011 PSP awards lapsed in February 2014 due to performance conditions not being met, near 100% of the 2012 PSP awards are expected to vest in February 2015 based on achievement of three year EPS and relative total shareholder return performance targets.
The Remuneration Committee (the "Committee") regularly reviews the senior Executive remuneration policy to ensure it promotes the attraction, motivation and retention of the high quality Executives who are key to delivering the Company's strategy in the past and who will be key to delivering sustainable earnings growth and shareholder return in the future.
The Committee's most recent conclusions are that the existing senior Executive remuneration policy remains appropriate and should continue to operate for FY2015. The key points to note are as follows:
In conclusion, the Committee believes that the current remuneration policy continues to incentivise the delivery of strong yet sustainable financial results and the creation of shareholder value.
Chairman of the Remuneration Committee 21 January 2015
The policy has been developed taking into account the principles of the UK Corporate Governance Code. The Board recognises that the Directors' remuneration is of legitimate concern to shareholders and is committed to following current best practice. The Group operates within a competitive environment; performance depends on the individual contributions of the Directors and employees and the Group believes in rewarding vision and innovation.
When setting Executive Directors' remuneration, the committee endeavours to ensure that all Directors are provided with appropriate performance related and non-performance related pay to encourage enhanced performance and that they are, in a fair and responsible manner, rewarded for their individual contributions to the success of the Group.
The policy of the Board is to provide Executive remuneration packages designed to attract, motivate and retain Directors of the calibre necessary to maintain and improve the Group's profitability and effectiveness and to reward them for enhancing shareholder value and return. To do this, it aims to provide a market competitive (but not excessive) package of pay and benefits. The Group's general policy is to set basic salaries around mid-market levels and set performance pay levels which are at the upper quartile of market practice but with stretching goals which accords with the Group's general policy of seeking to make bonuses self-financing wherever possible. Remuneration packages will also reflect the Directors' responsibilities and contain incentives to deliver the Group's objectives.
The Committee considers shareholder feedback received in relation to the AGM each year at a meeting immediately following the AGM. This feedback, plus any additional feedback received during any meetings from time to time, is then considered as part of the Group's annual review of remuneration policy. In addition, the Remuneration Committee will seek to engage directly with major shareholders and their representative bodies should any material changes be made to the remuneration policy. Details of votes cast for and against the resolution to approve last year's remuneration report and any matters discussed with shareholders during the year are set out in the Annual report on remuneration.
The Committee considers the general basic salary increase for the broader UK employee population when determining the annual salary increases for the Executive Directors. Employees have not been consulted in respect of the design of the Group's senior Executive remuneration policy, although the committee will keep this under review.
The relative increase in Chief Executive Officer pay for the year under review, as compared with that of the general workforce, is set out in the Annual report on remuneration. The committee also considers environmental, social and governance issues, and risk when reviewing executive pay quantum and structure.
| Element | How component supports corporate strategy |
Operation | Maximum | Performance targets and recovery provisions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basic salary | Attracts and retains appropriate talent. Reflects an individual's responsibilities, experience and role. |
Normally reviewed annually on 1 May and takes effect from this date. Salaries are paid monthly. Decisions influenced by: – responsibilities, abilities, experience and performance of an individual; and – the Group's salary and pay structures and general workforce increases. Salaries are benchmarked periodically against companies of a similar size and complexity. |
There is no prescribed maximum annual basic salary increase. The Committee is guided by the general increase for the broader employee population but may decide to award a lower increase for Executive Directors or indeed exceed this to recognise, for example, an increase in the scale, scope or responsibility of the role and/or to take account relevant market movements. Current salary levels are set out in the Annual report on remuneration. |
Not applicable. |
| Annual bonus | Rewards the achievement of a combination of financial and non-financial performance targets in line with corporate strategy over the one-year operating cycle. |
Targets reviewed annually. Bonus level is determined by the Committee after the end of the relevant financial year, subject to performance against targets set at the start of the year. |
Maximum: 100% of salary. | Performance period: one year. Performance metrics: EBITDA targets and personal objectives. Claw-back provision operates. |
| Summary of prevailing remuneration policy continued | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Element | How component supports corporate strategy |
Operation | Maximum | Performance targets and recovery provisions |
||
| Long-term incentive plan |
Incentivises Directors to achieve returns for shareholders over the long term. |
Performance Share Plan ("PSP") approved by shareholders in 2009. Awards of nil-cost or conditional shares are made annually with vesting dependent on the achievement of performance conditions over the subsequent three years. The Committee reviews the quantum of awards annually and monitors the continuing suitability of the performance measures. |
Normal grant level: 125% of salary. Normal maximum: 150% of salary. Exceptional maximum: 200% of salary. Participants may benefit from the value of dividends paid over the vesting period to the extent that awards vest. This benefit is delivered in the form of cash or additional shares at the time that awards vest. |
Performance period: three years. Majority of awards are subject to PBT EPS growth targets, with minority subject to TSR performance against a comparator group of other companies. 25% of an award vests at threshold performance (0% vests below this), increasing to 100% pro-rata for maximum performance. Claw-back provision operates. |
||
| All-employee Sharesave |
Encourages long-term shareholding in the Company. |
Invitations made by the Committee under the Approved Sharesave Scheme. |
As per HMRC limits. | None. | ||
| Share ownership | Further aligns Executives with investors, while encouraging employee share ownership. |
50% of the net of tax vested PSP shares required to be retained until the shareholding guideline is met. |
100% of salary. | None. | ||
| Benefits | Provides insured benefits to support the individual and their family during periods of ill health, accidents or death. Car allowance facilitates effective travel. |
Includes car allowance, life insurance, private medical and dental insurance. Other benefits may be provided where appropriate. |
At cost. | None. | ||
| Pension | Provides retirement benefits. | Defined contribution arrangements and/or salary supplements. |
Up to 20% of basic salary. | None. | ||
| Non-Executive Directors |
Provides fees reflecting time commitments and responsibilities of each role, in line with those provided by similarly sized companies. |
Cash fee paid on a monthly basis. Fees are reviewed annually. |
No maximum. | None. |
1 The Annual report on remuneration sets out how the Company intends to implement the policy presented in this table.
2 Below the Board level, a lower or no annual bonus opportunity may apply and participation in the PSP is limited to the Executive Directors and certain selected senior managers. Other employees are eligible to participate in the Company's Sharesave scheme. In general, these differences arise from the development of remuneration arrangements that are market competitive for the various categories of individuals, together with the fact that remuneration of the Executive Directors and senior executives typically has a greater emphasis on performance related pay.
3 The choice of the performance metrics applicable to the annual bonus scheme reflect the Committee's belief that any incentive compensation should be appropriately challenging and tied to both the delivery of EBITDA growth and specific individual objectives.
4 The TSR and EPS performance conditions applicable to the PSP (see Annual report on remuneration) were selected by the Remuneration Committee on the basis that they reward the delivery of long-term returns to shareholders and the Group's financial growth and are consistent with the Company's objective of delivering superior levels of long-term value to shareholders. The TSR performance condition is monitored on the Committee's behalf by New Bridge Street (part of Aon plc) whilst the Group's EPS growth is derived from the audited financial statements.
5 The Committee operates the PSP in accordance with the plan rules and the Listing Rules and the Committee, consistent with market practice, retains discretion over a number of areas relating to the operation and administration of the plan.
6 While PSP awards currently vest after three years subject to continued service and performance targets, the Committee will consider developments in best practice when setting future long-term incentive grant policies and, in particular, whether the introduction of a post vesting holding period, in addition to the existing shareholding guidelines, is appropriate for the Company.
7 The all-employee Sharesave scheme does not have performance conditions.
8 For the avoidance of doubt, in approving this Directors' remuneration policy, authority is given to the Company to honour any commitments entered into with current or former Directors (such as the payment of a pension, payment of last year's annual bonus or the vesting/exercise of share awards granted in the past). Details of any payments to former Directors will be set out in the Annual report on remuneration as they arise.
The chart below shows how the composition of each of the Executive Directors' remuneration packages varies at different levels of performance under the policy set out above, as a percentage of total remuneration opportunity and as a total value:
1 The minimum performance scenario comprises the fixed elements of remuneration only, including:
2 The on-target level of bonus is taken to be 50% of the maximum bonus opportunity (100% of salary only), and the on-target level of PSP vesting is assumed to be 50% of the face value assuming a normal grant level (125% of salary). These values are included in addition to the components/values of minimum remuneration.
3 Maximum assumes full bonus payout (100% of salary only) and the full face value of the PSP (125% of salary only), in addition to fixed components of remuneration.
4 No share price growth has been factored into the calculations.
The remuneration package for a Director would be set in accordance with the terms of the Company's prevailing approved remuneration policy at the time of appointment and take into account the skills and experience of the individual, the market rate for a candidate of that experience and the importance of securing the relevant individual.
Salary would be provided at such a level as required to attract the most appropriate candidate and may be set initially at a below mid-market level on the basis that it may progress towards the mid-market level once expertise and performance has been proven and sustained. The annual bonus potential would be limited to 100% of salary and grants under the PSP would be limited to 150% of salary (200% of salary in exceptional circumstances). In addition, the Committee may offer additional cash and/or share based elements to replace deferred or incentive pay forfeited by an Executive leaving a previous employer. It would seek to ensure, where possible, that these awards would be consistent with awards forfeited in terms of vesting periods, expected value and performance conditions.
For an internal Executive Director appointment, any variable pay element awarded in respect of the prior role may be allowed to pay out according to its terms. In addition, any other ongoing remuneration obligations existing prior to appointment may continue.
For external and internal appointments, the Committee may agree that the Company will meet certain relocation and/or incidental expenses as appropriate.
If appropriate the Committee may agree on a recruitment of a new Executive a notice period in excess of twelve months but to reduce this to twelve months over a specified period.
The service agreements of the Executive Directors are not fixed term and are terminable by either the Company or the Director on the following bases:
| Director | Date of current service contract | Notice period |
|---|---|---|
| F Vecchioli | 3 September 2013 | Twelve months |
| A Jones | 29 January 2013 | Twelve months |
At the Board's discretion early termination of an Executive Director's service contract can be undertaken by way of payment of salary and benefits in lieu of the required notice period. A summary of the main contractual terms surrounding termination is set out below:
| Provision | Detailed terms |
|---|---|
| Notice period | Twelve months |
| Termination payment | Payment in lieu of notice based on salary and specified benefits |
| Remuneration entitlements | A bonus may be payable (pro-rated where relevant) and outstanding share awards may vest (see below) |
| Change of control | No Executive Director's contract contains additional provisions in respect of change of control |
Annual bonus may be payable with respect to the period of the financial year served although it will be pro-rated for time and paid at the normal payout date. Any share based entitlements granted to an Executive Director under the Company's share plans will be determined based on the relevant plan rules. However, in certain prescribed circumstances, such as death, ill health, disability, retirement or other circumstances at the discretion of the Committee, "good leaver" status may be applied. For good leavers, awards will normally vest at the normal vesting date, subject to the satisfaction of the relevant performance conditions at that time and reduced pro-rata to reflect the proportion of the performance period actually served. However, the Remuneration Committee has discretion to determine that awards vest at cessation of employment.
The Board allows Executive Directors to accept appropriate outside commercial non-executive director appointments provided the aggregate commitment is compatible with their duties as Executive Directors. The Executive Directors concerned may retain fees paid for these services, which will be subject to approval by the Board.
The Group's policy is to appoint Non-Executive Directors to the Board with a breadth of skills and experience that are relevant to the Group's business. Appointments are made by the Board upon the recommendations and advice from the Nomination Committee.
The Non-Executive Directors do not have service contracts but their appointments are subject to review every three years under the rotation provisions of the Company's Articles of Association. They all have notice periods of three months.
Basic salary is determined by reference to the individual's experience, performance, responsibility and pay levels across the Group more generally. In addition, the Committee reviews periodically basic salary levels within similarly sized listed real estate and pan-sector companies although the Committee is careful not to place excessive reliance on the use of external comparator analysis. Current basic salary levels for Executive Directors are presented below:
| From 1 November 2014 |
From 1 November 2013 |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| F Vecchioli | Chief Executive Officer | £325,000 | £290,0001 |
| A Jones | Chief Financial Officer | £255,000 | £242,0002 |
1 F Vecchioli's basic salary was set at £290,000 which was considered below market and below that of his predecessor. Consistent with the Company's policy on recruitments and promotions described in the Directors' remuneration policy, his basic salary was increased to mid-market levels from the first anniversary of appointment given individual's experience and expertise in the role.
2 A Jones' basic salary was set at £242,000 from appointment and was reviewed on 1 May 2014 (the normal review date). His increase reflected his performance in the role to date and was commensurate with increases awarded to high performing employees across the workforce.
The Committee will operate an annual bonus plan for Executive Directors during FY2015 in line with that operated in FY2014. The maximum bonus will remain at 100% of basic salary, with measurement based upon sliding scale EBITDA and personal objectives set at the start of each financial year in the ratio of 80:20. In addition to this, EBITDA must be greater than the previous financial year for any bonus to be payable. We have not disclosed specific targets for FY2015 prospectively as they are considered to be commercially sensitive, although the Committee is satisfied that they will be demanding and require performance significantly better than budget for full payout and the targets will be disclosed retrospectively.
The 2009 Performance Share Plan ("PSP") is the Group's primary long-term incentive arrangement. Awards in relation to the year ended 31 October 2014 will be over 125% of salary and are likely to be granted in February 2015. The 2015 PSP awards will be subject to EPS and TSR conditions as follows:
Taxable benefits provided will continue to include a car allowance, life insurance, private medical and dental insurance. Benefits in kind are not pensionable and are not taken into account when determining basic salary for performance related remuneration.
The Group will continue to contribute 10% of basic salary for the pension arrangements of the Executive Directors.
The Company's approach to Non-Executive Directors' remuneration is set by the Board with account taken of the time and responsibility involved in each role, including where applicable the Chairmanship of Board committees. A summary of current fees is as follows:
| FY2015 | FY2014 | % increase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chairman | £100,000 | £100,000 | 0% |
| Base fee | £35,000 | £35,000 | 0% |
| Additional fees: | |||
| Committee Chair fees | £10,000 | £10,000 | 0% |
The following details set out on pages 44 to 46 of this report have been audited by Deloitte LLP.
| Salary Taxable PSP awards |
Pension | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| and fees £'000 |
benefits £'000 |
Bonus1 £'000 |
vesting2 £'000 |
Other £'000 |
costs £'000 |
Total £'000 |
|
| 2014 Chairman and Executive Directors |
|||||||
| A S Lewis3 | 83 | — | — | — | — | — | 83 |
| R S Grainger3 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | 17 |
| F Vecchioli4 | 296 | 24 | 247 | 376 | — | 30 | 973 |
| A Jones5 | 248 | 19 | 194 | — | 100 | 25 | 586 |
| 644 | 43 | 441 | 376 | 100 | 55 | 1,659 | |
| Non-Executive Directors | |||||||
| A H Martin | 39 | — | — | — | — | — | 39 |
| A S Lewis3 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | 6 |
| J L Kenrick6 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | 2 |
| K G Edelman | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | 45 |
| I Krieger | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | 41 |
| 133 | — | — | — | — | — | 133 | |
| Total | 777 | 43 | 441 | 376 | 100 | 55 | 1,792 |
| 2013 | |||||||
| Chairman and Executive Directors | |||||||
| R S Grainger3 | 90 | — | — | — | — | — | 90 |
| F Vecchioli4 | 192 | 3 | 135 | — | — | 29 | 359 |
| A Jones5 | 117 | 8 | 83 | — | 50 | 12 | 270 |
| 399 | 11 | 218 | — | 50 | 41 | 719 | |
| Non-Executive Directors | |||||||
| A H Martin | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | 45 |
| A S Lewis | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | 35 |
| K G Edelman | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | 45 |
| I Krieger7 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | 3 |
| 128 | — | — | — | — | — | 128 | |
| Former Directors8 | 487 | 35 | 227 | — | 409 | 67 | 1,225 |
| Total | 1,014 | 46 | 445 | — | 459 | 108 | 2,072 |
1 The performance related annual bonus is based on performance measures, as disclosed in the policy table on pages 39 and 40, 80% of which relate to adjusted EBITDA before non-recurring items, and 20% to an assessment of the personal performance of the directors. The final bonus payable for the year included 70.0% (2013: 62.5%) of the adjusted EBITDA element and 100% (2013: 100%) of the personal performance element.
2 As a result of the near maximum PBT-EPS target being met (14.1 pence compared with a maximum target of 14.2 pence) and an expectation of upper quartile TSR performance (albeit the TSR performance period does not technically end until 31 January 2015), near 100% of the PSP awards granted in 2012 are expected to vest in early 2015). The value of the 2012 award held by Frederic Vecchioli has been valued at £376k based on near 100% expected vesting and a three month average share price to 31 October 2014 of 210.5 pence.
3 Alan Lewis succeeded Richard Grainger as Chairman upon his retirement on 31 December 2013. Alan Lewis was a Non-Executive Director prior to his appointment as Chairman.
4 Frederic Vecchioli was appointed Chief Executive on 4 September 2013; previously he was an Executive Director.
5 Andy Jones was appointed a Director on 7 May 2013. As disclosed last year, it was agreed that a £100,000 retention award which was forfeited upon his resignation from his previous employer would be compensated but not until the first anniversary of appointment. It was further agreed that Andy Jones would invest the net of tax proceeds of the value compensated into Safestore Holdings plc shares and retain these shares.
6 Joanne Kenrick joined the Board on 8 October 2014.
7 Ian Krieger joined the Board on 3 October 2013.
8 Peter Gowers stepped down from the Board on 4 September 2013. Richard Hodsden stepped down from the Board on 7 May 2013.
| As a percentage of maximum bonus opportunity |
Performance required | Actual performance | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measure | CEO | CFO | Threshold | On-target | Maximum | Actual | Payout % |
| Adjusted EBITDA before non-recurring items (£'m) |
80% | 80% | 52.6 | 54.8 | 57.0 | 54.8 | 56% |
| Personal performance | 20% | 20% | Objectives based on personal and business targets1 |
Objectives met in full |
20% |
1 Based on delivery of strategy, trading performance improvement, and capital structure objectives.
| PSP share awards | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Number | Basis of awards | Face value | |
| F Vecchioli | 186,856 | 125% of salary | £362,500 |
| A Jones | 155,928 | £302,500 |
The face value of the awards is based on a price of £1.94, being the closing share price from the business day immediately preceding the award which was granted on 4 February 2014. The awards are contingent upon satisfying performance conditions measured over three years, as detailed on page 43.
No payments for loss of office were made during the year.
No payments were made to past Directors during the year.
| Awards granted |
Maximum award |
Awards vested |
Awards lapsed |
Maximum outstanding awards at 31 October 2014 |
Market price at date of vesting (p) |
Market price at date of exercise (p) |
Normal vesting date |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F Vecchioli | 02/02/2011 | 137,747 | — | (137,747) | — | — | — | 02/02/2014 |
| 02/02/2012 | 178,597 | — | — | 178,597 | — | — | 02/02/2015 | |
| 06/02/2013 | 165,869 | — | — | 165,869 | — | — | 06/02/2016 | |
| 04/02/2014 | 186,856 | — | — | 186,856 | — | — | 04/02/2017 | |
| A Jones | 28/06/2013 | 293,927 | — | — | 293,927 | — | — | 28/06/2016 |
| 04/02/2014 | 155,928 | — | — | 155,928 | — | — | 04/02/2017 |
The PSP awards are subject to continued service over three years and the following performance targets:
| EPS (two-thirds) | TSR (one-third) | |
|---|---|---|
| 2011, 2012 and 2013 PSP awards | 25% of this part of an award vests for PBT-EPS growth of RPI+2% per annum with full vesting of this part of an award for PBT-EPS growth of RPI+6% per annum. A sliding scale operates between these points. |
25% of this part of an award vests if Safestore's TSR is at a median of the comparator group (FTSE SmallCap excluding investment trusts), with full vesting of this part of an award for upper quartile |
| 2014 PSP awards | 25% of this part of an award vests for PBT-EPS growth of RPI+3% per annum with full vesting of this part of an award for PBT-EPS growth of RPI+8% per annum. A sliding scale operates between these points. |
performance. A sliding scale operates between these points. In addition to the above, no part of the TSR awards will vest unless the Committee is also satisfied that the TSR performance of the Group is reflective of the Group's underlying performance. |
The 2011 PSP award lapsed in February 2014 due to performance conditions not being met.
| Ordinary shares of 1 pence each (thousands) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beneficial | |||||
| 1 November 2013 |
31 October 2014 |
21 January 2015 |
Shareholding guideline |
Actual | |
| Executive Directors | |||||
| F Vecchioli | 1,151 | 1,451 | 1,451 | 100% | 928% |
| A B Jones | — | 30 | 30 | 100% | 24% |
| A S Lewis | 200 | 400 | 400 | n/a | n/a |
| A H Martin | 20 | 40 | 40 | n/a | n/a |
| K G Edelman | — | 25 | 25 | n/a | n/a |
| J L Kenrick1 | — | — | — | n/a | n/a |
| I S Krieger | — | 20 | 20 | n/a | n/a |
| R S Grainger2 | 101 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| 1,472 | 1,966 | 1,966 |
1 Joanne Kenrick joined the Board on 8 October 2014.
2 Richard Grainger retired from the Board on 31 December 2013.
The graph below shows the value, by 31 October 2014, of £100 invested in Safestore Holdings plc over the past six years compared with the value of £100 invested in the FTSE SmallCap Index and the FTSE All Share Real Estate Investment & Services Index. The other points plotted are the values at intervening financial year ends. These comparators have been chosen on the basis that they are the markets within which Safestore operates, albeit that the FTSE All Share Real Estate Investment & Services Index comprises mainly commercial property companies.
| CEO | Annual | PSP vesting | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| single figure | bonus payout | against | ||
| of total | against | maximum | ||
| opportunity | ||||
| F Vecchioli | £973,000 | 76% | 100% | |
| F Vecchioli1 | £359,000 | 70% | — | |
| P D Gowers2 | £910,000 | 70% | — | |
| P D Gowers | £390,000 | — | — | |
| P D Gowers | £425,000 | 59% | — | |
| S W Williams3 | £597,000 | — | — | |
| S W Williams | £607,000 | 75% | — | |
| S W Williams | £485,000 | — | — | |
| Incumbent | remuneration | maximum |
1 Appointed Chief Executive Officer from 4 September 2013.
2 Appointed Chief Executive Officer on 1 March 2011, stepped down as Chief Executive Officer on 4 September 2013 and left the Company on 31 October 2013.
3 Stepped down as Chief Executive Officer on 28 February 2011 and left the Company on 30 April 2011.
The table below shows the percentage change in remuneration of the Director undertaking the role of Chief Executive Officer and the Company's employees as a whole between FY2014 and FY2013.
| Percentage increase in remuneration in 2014 compared with remuneration in 2013 |
||
|---|---|---|
| CEO | Average pay based on all employees |
|
| Salary | 54% | 2% |
| Benefits | 700% | 0% |
| Annual bonus | 83% | 4% |
1 Comparison relates to remuneration for Frederic Vecchioli between 2013 and 2014.
The following table shows the Company's actual spend on pay (for all employees) relative to dividends:
| 2012/2013 | 2013/2014 | % change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Staff costs (£m) | 17.2 | 17.9 | 4.1% |
| Dividends (£m) | 10.6 | 12.5 | 17.9% |
The Remuneration Committee currently comprises three independent Non-Executive Directors.
Details of the Directors who were members of the Committee during the year are disclosed on page 33.
It remains the Committee's policy that it shall be available to meet on an ad hoc basis when the needs of the Group require it. At the invitation of the Chairman, the Chairman of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer and HR Director may attend meetings of the Committee, except when their own remuneration is under consideration. No Director is involved in determining his or her own remuneration. The Company Secretary acts as the secretary to the Committee. The members of the Committee can, where they judge it necessary to discharge their responsibilities, obtain independent professional advice at the Group's expense. The Committee's terms of reference are published on the Group's website at www.safestore.com and are available in hard copy on application to the Company Secretary.
During the year, the Committee received advice from New Bridge Street (part of Aon plc), an independent remuneration consultancy, in connection with remuneration matters including the provision of general guidance on market and best practice. New Bridge Street has no other connection or relationship with the Group and provided no other services to the Group during FY2014. Its fees for the year amounted to £19,000 (2013: £31,000).
At the AGM held on 19 March 2014, the Directors' remuneration report resolutions received the following votes from shareholders:
| Annual statement and Annual report on remuneration |
Directors' remuneration policy | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total number of votes |
% of votes cast |
Total number of votes |
% of votes cast |
|
| For | 165,826,824 | 98.47 | 160,763,590 | 94.48 |
| Discretion | 2,583 | 0.01 | 2,583 | 0.01 |
| Against | 2,555,832 | 1.52 | 9,376,570 | 5.51 |
| Total votes cast | 168,385,239 | 170,142,743 | ||
| Votes withheld | 1,832,591 | 75,087 | ||
| Total votes cast (including withheld votes) | 170,217,830 | 170,217,830 |
Safestore Holdings plc is incorporated as a public limited company and is registered in England with the registered number 4726380. The address of the registered office is Brittanic House, Stirling Way, Borehamwood, Hertfordshire WD6 2BT, United Kingdom.
The Directors present their report and the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended 31 October 2014. References to Safestore, the "Group", and the "Company", "we" or "our" are to Safestore Holdings plc, and its subsidiary companies where appropriate.
A review of the development of the Group's business during the year, the principal risks and uncertainties facing the Group and its future prospects are included in the Chairman's statement and the Strategic report which should be read in conjunction with this report.
The results for the year ended 31 October 2014 are set out in the Group statement of comprehensive income on page 56.
An interim dividend of 2.15 pence (2013: 1.85 pence) was paid on 15 August 2014 and this included a PID of 2.15 pence (2013: 0.18 pence). The Directors recommend a final dividend in respect of the year ended 31 October 2014 of 5.30 pence per ordinary share (2013: 3.90 pence). The PID element of the final dividend will be 2.65 pence (2013: 3.90 pence). If authorised at the 2015 AGM, the dividend will be paid on 8 April 2015 to members on the register on 13 March 2015.
The PID will be paid after the deduction of withholding tax at the basic rate (currently 20%). However, certain categories of shareholder may be entitled to receive payment of a gross PID if they are UK resident companies, UK public bodies, UK pension funds and managers of ISAs, PEPs and child trust funds. Information together with the relevant forms which must be completed and submitted to the Company's registrars for shareholders who are eligible to receive gross PIDs is available in the investor relations section of the Company's website. The ordinary dividend is not subject to withholding tax.
The Directors of Safestore are confident that, on the basis of current financial projections and facilities available and after considering sensitivities, the Group has sufficient resources for its operational needs and to enable the Group to remain in compliance with the financial covenants in its bank facilities for at least the next twelve months.
The financial risk management objectives and policies of the Group, along with any details of exposure to any liability and cash flow risk, are set out on page 12 to 14 and notes 2 and 19 to the financial statements.
Information on long term incentive schemes can be found in note 22 to the Group financial statements.
There are no reported post-balance sheet events.
Details of the Directors of the Company who served throughout the year ended 31 October 2014 and up to the date of the financial statements, and their interests in the ordinary share capital of the Company and details of options granted to Executive Directors under the Group's share schemes, are set out in the Annual remuneration report on pages 43 to 48.
The Company's rules governing the appointment and replacement of Directors are contained in its Articles of Association. Changes to the Articles of Association are only permitted in accordance with legislation and must be approved by a special resolution of shareholders. The Company's Articles of Association provide that a Director may be appointed by an ordinary resolution of the shareholders or by the existing Directors, either to fill a vacancy or as an additional Director. Further information on the Company's internal procedures for the appointment of Directors is given in the Corporate governance section on pages 32 to 34.
The Company's Articles of Association require that one-third of Directors retire by rotation each year and that each Director must retire at intervals of not more than three years. Non-Executive Directors must retire annually once they have been in office for a period of more than eight years.
The Board, which is responsible for the management of the business, may exercise all the powers of the Company subject to the provisions of relevant legislation and the Company's Memorandum and Articles of Association. The powers of the Directors set out in the Articles of Association include those in relation to the issue and buyback of shares.
The Directors have (and during the year ended 31 October 2014 had) the benefit of the qualifying third party indemnity provision contained in the Company's Articles of Association which provides a limited indemnity in respect of liabilities incurred as a Director or other officer of the Company.
No member of the Board had a material interest in any contract of significance with the Company, or any of its subsidiaries, at any time during the year. Directors are required to notify the Company of any conflict or potential conflict of interest. The Board confirms that no conflicts have been identified or notified to the Company during the year and, accordingly, the Board has not authorised any conflicts of interest as permitted by the Company's Articles of Association.
At 31 October 2014, the Company's issued share capital comprised 207,134,266 ordinary shares of 1 pence each. Details of movements in the share capital during the year are provided in note 22 of the financial statements. The rights and obligations attaching to the Company's ordinary shares are set out in its Articles of Association.
The Employee Benefit Trust retains 142,851 ordinary shares (FY2013: 142,851 ordinary shares) with a cost of £1,429 (FY2013: £1,429) in satisfaction of awards under the Group's Long Term Incentive Plan. This represents 0.07% (FY2013: 0.08%) of the total issued share capital of the Company.
The Company was granted authority at the 2014 AGM to make market purchases of its own ordinary shares. This authority will expire at the conclusion of the 2015 AGM and a resolution will be proposed to seek further authority. No ordinary shares were purchased under this authority during the year or in the period from 1 November 2013 to 21 January 2014.
The Group's bank facilities agreement and US private placement note agreement contain provisions entitling the counterparty to terminate the contractual agreements in the event of a change of control of the Group. The Group's share schemes contain provisions relating to the vesting and exercising of options in the event of a change of control of the Group.
Information in respect of the Group's environmental and employment policies and greenhouse gas reporting are summarised in Corporate and social responsibility on pages 23 to 27 and are also available on the Group's website.
The Company's Articles of Association may only be amended by special resolution at a general meeting of the shareholders.
In accordance with the Disclosure and Transparency Rules DTR 5, the Company has been notified of the following disclosable interests in its issued ordinary shares:
| At 10 January 2015 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Number '000 |
Percentage of current issued share capital |
||
| JP Morgan Asset Management | 11,675 | 5.64 | |
| Henderson Global Investors | 11,487 | 5.55 | |
| Legal and General Investment | |||
| Management | 11,307 | 5.46 | |
| CBRE Global Investors | 11,067 | 5.34 | |
| APG Investments | 10,090 | 4.87 | |
| BlackRock Investment Management (UK) | 10,087 | 4.87 | |
| Schroder Investment Management | 8,858 | 4.28 | |
| Principal Global Investors | 7,509 | 3.63 | |
| F&C Asset Management | 7,064 | 3.41 |
All interests disclosed to the Company in accordance with the Disclosure and Transparency Rules DTR 5 that have occurred since 9 January 2015 can be found at our corporate website: www.safestore.com.
In the case of each of the persons who are Directors at the time when the report is approved under Section 418 of the Companies Act 2006 the following applies:
Deloitte LLP have indicated their willingness to continue in office and a resolution that they be re-appointed will be proposed at the Annual General Meeting.
The Annual General Meeting will be held at the Company's registered office at Brittanic House, Stirling Way, Borehamwood, Hertfordshire WD6 2BT on 19 March 2015 at 12.00 noon.
The 2015 AGM will include, as special business, resolutions dealing with authority to issue shares, disapplication of pre-emption rights, authority to purchase the Company's own shares, authority for scrip dividend alternative, and authority to call a general meeting on not less than 14 days' notice. The Notice of Annual General Meeting sets out details of the business to be considered at the AGM and contains explanatory notes on such business. This has been despatched to shareholders and can be found on our corporate website: www.safestore.com.
Shareholders are encouraged to use their vote at this year's AGM either by attending the meeting in person or by completing and returning the Form of Proxy in accordance with the instructions set out in the form. Completing and returning the Form of Proxy will not prevent shareholders from attending and voting at the meeting.
By order of the Board
Company Secretary 21 January 2015
The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report, the Directors' remuneration report and the financial statements in accordance with applicable law and regulations.
Company law requires the Directors to prepare financial statements for each financial year. Under that law the Directors have prepared the Group financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRSs") as adopted by the European Union and the parent company financial statements in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (United Kingdom Accounting Standards and applicable law). Under company law the Directors must not approve the financial statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Group and the Company and of the profit or loss of the Group for that period. In preparing these financial statements, the Directors are required to:
The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the Company's transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the Company and the Group and enable them to ensure that the financial statements and the Directors' remuneration report comply with the Companies Act 2006 and, as regards the Group financial statements, Article 4 of the IAS Regulation. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the Company and the Group and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.
The Directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the Company's website. Legislation in the United Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.
Having taken all matters considered by the Board and brought to the attention of the Board during the year into account, the Directors consider that the Annual Report and Accounts, taken as a whole, are fair, balanced and understandable and provide the information necessary for shareholders to assess the Company's performance, business model and strategy.
Each of the Directors, whose names and functions are listed on pages 29 to 31 confirm that, to the best of their knowledge:
In accordance with Section 418 of the Companies Act 2006, Directors' reports shall include a statement, in the case of each Director in office at the date the Directors' report is approved, that:
The Annual Report on pages 1 to 95 was approved by the Board of Directors and authorised for issue on 22 January 2015.
By order of the Board
S Ahmed Company Secretary
The financial statements comprise the Consolidated Income Statement, the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income, the Consolidated and Company Balance Sheets, the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders' Equity, the Consolidated Cash Flow Statement and the related notes 1 to 30, and in relation to the parent company, notes 1 to 14.
The financial reporting framework that has been applied in the preparation of the Group financial statements is applicable law and IFRSs as adopted by the European Union. The financial reporting framework that has been applied in the preparation of the parent company financial statements is applicable law and United Kingdom Accounting Standards (United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice).
As required by the Listing Rules we have reviewed the directors' statement contained within the Directors' report that the Group is a going concern. We confirm that:
However, because not all future events or conditions can be predicted, this statement is not a guarantee as to the Group's ability to continue as a going concern.
The assessed risks of material misstatement described below are those that had the greatest effect on our audit strategy, the allocation of resources in the audit and directing the efforts of the engagement team:
| Risk | How the scope of our audit responded to the risk | |
|---|---|---|
| Valuation of investment property Investment properties are held at £704.0 million at 31 October 2014. This is the most quantitatively material balance in the financial statements. Investment properties are held at fair value on the balance |
We met with the third party valuers and assessed the appropriateness of the valuer's scope and whether the valuer had sufficient expertise and resource. |
|
| sheet. Fair value is by its nature subjective with significant judgement applied to the valuation. The key judgements about individual properties are cap rate, discount |
We obtained the source information provided by management (e.g. historical revenue on a store by store basis) to the valuer and tested the integrity of a sample of such information. |
|
| rate, rental growth and stabilized occupancy levels. These judgements drive a cash flow model that is used as the basis of the valuation of each individual property. For further details of the Group's valuation method and assumptions, refer to note 11 of the financial statements. |
We provided the valuations to our own internal real estate specialists, who are members of the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors. Our specialists performed an independent assessment of the assumptions that underpin the valuations, namely cap rates, discount rate, rental growth and stabilised occupancy on a property by property basis, based on their knowledge of the self-storage industry and wider real estate market. |
|
| Revenue recognition |
The Group recognises rental revenue over the period that the space is occupied by the customer. Accounting for rental revenue leads to significant deferred income balances, resulting in a risk of material misstatement that deferred revenue is not calculated correctly, and that revenue is recorded in the incorrect period.
The accuracy of revenue also has an impact on investment property valuations as the historical revenue data is a key input into the investment property valuation model. For further details of the Group's revenue recognition policy, refer to note 2 of the financial statements.
To gain assurance that revenue was being recorded appropriately in the financial statements, we tested the system used by the Group to calculate revenue. We also tested the interface controls between the revenue system and the general ledger, as well as testing a sample of reports reconciling the system to the general ledger.
We tested that revenue had been recorded in the appropriate period by selecting a sample of revenue invoices and recalculating the revenue recorded in the period, and revenue deferred at the period end. We also tested revenue on a store by store basis by establishing expectations of revenue based on our understanding of annual movements in revenue per store, and comparing to actual revenue.
The description of risks above should be read in conjunction with the significant issues considered by the Audit Committee and discussed in their report.
Last year the previous auditor's report included one other risk which is not included in our report this year: the risk of management override of internal controls. While we identified this as a significant risk, we did not consider it to be one which had the greatest effect on our audit strategy, the allocation of resources in the audit and directing the efforts of the engagement team.
Our audit procedures relating to these matters were designed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and not to express an opinion on individual accounts or disclosures. Our opinion on the financial statements is not modified with respect to any of the risks described above, and we do not express an opinion on these individual matters.
We define materiality as the magnitude of misstatement in the financial statements that makes it probable that the economic decisions of a reasonably knowledgeable person would be changed or influenced. We use materiality both in planning the scope of our audit work and in evaluating the results of our work.
We determined materiality for the Group to be £8.2 million. The figure was determined as 2% of net assets. We consider net assets to be a critical financial performance measure for the Group on the basis that it is a key metric used by management, investors, analysts and lenders.
In addition to net assets, we also consider profit before income tax, adjusted to exclude the gain on revaluation of investment properties and movements in the fair value of derivatives, to be a critical financial performance measure for the Group, which aligns closely with EPRA earnings. We applied a lower threshold of £1.6 million, which has been determined as 5% of adjusted profit before tax, for testing of balances impacting that measure, being Consolidated Income Statement balances with the exception primarily of fair value movements on investment property and derivatives.
Last year the previous auditors set materiality at £2.5 million, representing approximately 5% of the Group's pre-tax profit adjusted for interest, gains on investment properties and gains/losses on derivatives.
We agreed with the Audit Committee that we would report to the Committee all audit differences in excess of £164,000, as well as differences below that threshold that, in our view, warranted reporting on qualitative grounds. We also report to the Audit Committee on disclosure matters that we identified when assessing the overall presentation of the financial statements.
Our Group audit was scoped by obtaining an understanding of the Group and its environment, including Group-wide controls, and assessing the risks of material misstatement at the Group level.
We determined that there were two components within the Group; the United Kingdom and France operations. In addition to performing the Group audit procedures, which included the testing of the consolidation process, the Group audit team also performed the audit of the United Kingdom component given all United Kingdom entities operate from the same office with the same financial system. We instructed component auditors to perform the audit of the France component, and visited the component auditors in France to review the work performed by them during their audit. Our component audit work was executed at levels of materiality applicable to each individual component which were lower than Group materiality, ranging from £3.7 million to £5.2 million. In addition, for the lower materiality described above, our component materialities ranged from £0.6 million to £0.9 million.
In our opinion:
Under the Companies Act 2006 we are required to report to you if, in our opinion:
We have nothing to report in respect of these matters.
Under the Companies Act 2006 we are also required to report if in our opinion certain disclosures of directors' remuneration have not been made or the part of the Directors' Remuneration Report to be audited is not in agreement with the accounting records and returns. We have nothing to report arising from these matters.
Under the Listing Rules we are also required to review the part of the Corporate Governance Statement relating to the company's compliance with ten provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code. We have nothing to report arising from our review.
Under International Standards on Auditing (UK and Ireland), we are required to report to you if, in our opinion, information in the annual report is:
In particular, we are required to consider whether we have identified any inconsistencies between our knowledge acquired during the audit and the directors' statement that they consider the annual report is fair, balanced and understandable and whether the annual report appropriately discloses those matters that we communicated to the audit committee which we consider should have been disclosed. We confirm that we have not identified any such inconsistencies or misleading statements.
As explained more fully in the Directors' Responsibilities Statement, the directors are responsible for the preparation of the financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view. Our responsibility is to audit and express an opinion on the financial statements in accordance with applicable law and International Standards on Auditing (UK and Ireland). Those standards require us to comply with the Auditing Practices Board's Ethical Standards for Auditors. We also comply with International Standard on Quality Control 1 (UK and Ireland). Our audit methodology and tools aim to ensure that our quality control procedures are effective, understood and applied. Our quality controls and systems include our dedicated professional standards review team and independent partner reviews.
This report is made solely to the company's members, as a body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the company's members those matters we are required to state to them in an auditor's report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the company and the company's members as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.
An audit involves obtaining evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements sufficient to give reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free from material misstatement, whether caused by fraud or error. This includes an assessment of: whether the accounting policies are appropriate to the Group's and the parent company's circumstances and have been consistently applied and adequately disclosed; the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by the directors; and the overall presentation of the financial statements. In addition, we read all the financial and non-financial information in the annual report to identify material inconsistencies with the audited financial statements and to identify any information that is apparently materially incorrect based on, or materially inconsistent with, the knowledge acquired by us in the course of performing the audit. If we become aware of any apparent material misstatements or inconsistencies we consider the implications for our report.
for and on behalf of Deloitte LLP Chartered Accountants and Statutory Auditor London, United Kingdom
21 January 2015
Group
for the year ended 31 October 2014
| Notes | 2014 £'m |
2013 £'m |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 3 | 97.9 | 96.1 |
| Cost of sales | (32.3) | (31.8) | |
| Gross profit | 65.6 | 64.3 | |
| Administrative expenses | (14.1) | (16.6) | |
| Underlying EBITDA (operating profit before exceptional items, change in fair value of derivatives, gain/loss on investment properties, contingent rent and depreciation) |
53.0 | 50.8 | |
| Exceptional items | 5 | (1.0) | (0.7) |
| Change in fair value of derivatives | 1.2 | (1.3) | |
| Depreciation and contingent rent | (1.7) | (1.1) | |
| Operating profit before gain on investment properties | 51.5 | 47.7 | |
| Gain on investment properties | 11 | 24.1 | 21.5 |
| Operating profit | 3,6 | 75.6 | 69.2 |
| Finance income | 4 | 4.7 | 2.8 |
| Finance expense | 4 | (27.9) | (23.4) |
| Profit before income tax | 52.4 | 48.6 | |
| Income tax (charge)/credit1 | 8 | (5.6) | 59.9 |
| Profit for the year | 46.8 | 108.5 | |
| Earnings per share for profit attributable to the equity holders | |||
| – basic (pence) | 10 | 23.2 | 57.8 |
| – diluted (pence) | 10 | 23.0 | 57.3 |
| 1 Includes an exceptional credit of £nil (FY2013: £63.2 million) (see note 8). |
The financial results for both years relate to continuing activities.
The notes on pages 60 to 91 are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
| Group | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2014 £'m |
2013 £'m |
|
| Profit for the year | 46.8 | 108.5 |
| Other comprehensive income: | ||
| Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss: | ||
| Cash flow hedges | (3.3) | — |
| Recycling of hedge reserve | 6.7 | (0.5) |
| Currency translation differences | (8.4) | 6.0 |
| Tax on items taken to other comprehensive income | — | (1.1) |
| Other comprehensive (expenditure)/income, net of tax | (5.0) | 4.4 |
| Total comprehensive income for the year | 41.8 | 112.9 |
| Overview | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Group
as at 31 October 2014
| Notes | 2014 £'m |
2013 £'m |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Assets | |||
| Non-current assets | |||
| Investment properties | 11 | 704.0 | 724.6 |
| Interests in leasehold properties | 11 | 51.0 | 55.7 |
| Investment properties under construction | 11 | 5.3 | 5.6 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 12 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
| Deferred income tax assets | 21 | 2.0 | 3.3 |
| Other receivables | 15 | 4.8 | 6.4 |
| 768.6 | 797.4 | ||
| Current assets | |||
| Inventories | 14 | 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Trade and other receivables | 15 | 20.2 | 17.1 |
| Current income tax assets | 0.2 | — | |
| Derivative financial instruments | 19 | 0.3 | — |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 16 | 15.3 | 15.8 |
| 36.2 | 33.0 | ||
| Total assets | 804.8 | 830.4 | |
| Current liabilities | |||
| Financial liabilities | |||
| – bank borrowings | 18 | (5.0) | (5.0) |
| – derivative financial instruments | 19 | — | (0.4) |
| Trade and other payables | 17 | (36.7) | (34.8) |
| Current income tax liabilities | — | (0.8) | |
| Obligations under finance leases | 20 | (8.0) | (8.6) |
| (49.7) | (49.6) | ||
| Non-current liabilities | |||
| Financial liabilities | |||
| – bank borrowings | 18 | (259.6) | (337.9) |
| – derivative financial instruments | 19 | (4.8) | (10.6) |
| Deferred income tax liabilities | 21 | (39.7) | (39.3) |
| Obligations under finance leases | 20 | (43.0) | (47.1) |
| (347.1) | (434.9) | ||
| Total liabilities | (396.8) | (484.5) | |
| Net assets | 408.0 | 345.9 | |
| Equity | |||
| Ordinary shares | 22 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Share premium | 60.0 | 28.4 | |
| Other reserves | 23 | (2.9) | 2.1 |
| Retained earnings | 23 | 348.8 | 313.5 |
| Total equity | 408.0 | 345.9 |
These financial statements were authorised for issue by the Board of Directors on 21 January 2015 and signed on its behalf by:
| A Jones | F Vecchioli |
|---|---|
| Chief Financial Officer | Chief Executive Officer |
| Company registration number: 4726380 |
| Group | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Share capital £'m |
Share premium £'m |
Translation reserve £'m |
Hedge reserve £'m |
Retained earnings £'m |
Total £'m |
|
| Balance at 1 November 2012 | 1.9 | 28.3 | (0.5) | (1.8) | 215.4 | 243.3 |
| Comprehensive income | ||||||
| Profit for the year | — | — | — | — | 108.5 | 108.5 |
| Other comprehensive income | ||||||
| Currency translation differences | — | — | 6.0 | — | — | 6.0 |
| Recycling of hedge reserve | — | — | — | (0.5) | — | (0.5) |
| Tax on items taken to other comprehensive income | — | — | — | (1.1) | — | (1.1) |
| Total other comprehensive income | — | — | 6.0 | (1.6) | — | 4.4 |
| Total comprehensive income | — | — | 6.0 | (1.6) | 108.5 | 112.9 |
| Transactions with owners | ||||||
| Dividends (note 9) | — | — | — | — | (10.6) | (10.6) |
| Increase in share capital | — | 0.1 | — | — | — | 0.1 |
| Employee share options | — | — | — | — | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Transactions with owners | — | 0.1 | — | — | (10.4) | (10.3) |
| Balance at 1 November 2013 | 1.9 | 28.4 | 5.5 | (3.4) | 313.5 | 345.9 |
| Comprehensive income | ||||||
| Profit for the year | — | — | — | — | 46.8 | 46.8 |
| Other comprehensive income | ||||||
| Currency translation differences | — | — | (8.4) | — | — | (8.4) |
| Change in fair value of hedged instruments | — | — | — | (3.3) | — | (3.3) |
| Recycling of hedge reserve | — | — | — | 6.7 | — | 6.7 |
| Total other comprehensive income | — | — | (8.4) | 3.4 | — | (5.0) |
| Total comprehensive income | — | — | (8.4) | 3.4 | 46.8 | 41.8 |
| Transactions with owners | ||||||
| Dividends (note 9) | — | — | — | — | (12.5) | (12.5) |
| Increase in share capital | 0.2 | 31.6 | — | — | — | 31.8 |
| Employee share options | — | — | — | — | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Transactions with owners | 0.2 | 31.6 | — | — | (11.5) | 20.3 |
| Balance at 31 October 2014 | 2.1 | 60.0 | (2.9) | — | 348.8 | 408.0 |
| Overview | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Group
for the year ended 31 October 2014
| Notes | 2014 £'m |
2013 £'m |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash flows from operating activities | |||
| Cash generated from operations | 24 | 52.6 | 51.6 |
| Interest paid | (19.4) | (22.5) | |
| Interest received | 0.1 | — | |
| Tax paid | (1.9) | (0.1) | |
| Net cash inflow from operating activities | 31.4 | 29.0 | |
| Cash flows from investing activities | |||
| Expenditure on investment properties and development properties | (6.2) | (4.7) | |
| Proceeds in respect of Capital Goods Scheme | 1.8 | 3.1 | |
| Purchase of property, plant and equipment | (0.3) | (0.2) | |
| Proceeds from disposal of investment properties | 41.6 | — | |
| Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment | 0.1 | — | |
| Net cash inflow/(outflow) from investing activities | 37.0 | (1.8) | |
| Cash flows from financing activities | |||
| Issue of share capital | 31.8 | — | |
| Equity dividends paid | 9 | (12.5) | (10.6) |
| Proceeds from borrowings | 6.8 | 2.9 | |
| Debt issuance costs | (2.1) | — | |
| Hedge breakage payments | (4.9) | — | |
| Finance lease principal payments | (4.9) | (4.5) | |
| Repayment of borrowings | (82.1) | (6.3) | |
| Net cash outflow from financing activities | (67.9) | (18.5) | |
| Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | 0.5 | 8.7 | |
| Exchange (loss)/gain on cash and cash equivalents | (1.0) | 0.2 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents at 1 November | 15.8 | 6.9 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents at 31 October | 16,25 | 15.3 | 15.8 |
Safestore Holdings plc ("the Company") and its subsidiaries (together, "the Group") provide self-storage facilities to customers throughout the UK and Paris. The Company is a public limited company, which is listed on the London Stock Exchange and incorporated and domiciled in the UK. The address of its registered office is Brittanic House, Stirling Way, Borehamwood, Hertfordshire WD6 2BT.
The principal accounting policies of the Group are set out below. These policies have been consistently applied to each of the years presented, unless otherwise stated.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") as adopted by the European Union and International Financial Report Interpretations Committee ("IFRIC") interpretations. They also comply with those parts of the Companies Act 2006 applicable to companies reporting under IFRS.
The Group consolidated financial statements are presented in £ Sterling and are rounded to the nearest £0.1 million, unless otherwise stated. They are prepared on a going concern basis under the historical cost convention as modified by the revaluation of investment properties and the fair value of derivative financial instruments.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Although these estimates are based on management's best knowledge of the amount, event or actions, actual amounts may differ from those estimates.
The Directors of Safestore are confident that, on the basis of current financial projections and facilities available and after considering sensitivities, the Group has sufficient resources for its operational needs and to enable the Group to remain in compliance with the financial covenants in its bank facilities for at least the next twelve months.
At the date of approval of these financial statements, the following interpretations and amendments were endorsed by the EU and are mandatory for the Group for the first time for the financial year beginning 1 November 2013. There are no new standards, amendments or interpretations that are effective for the first time for the current financial year that have had a material impact on the Group.
— IFRS 13 'Fair Value Measurement' provides consistency by making available a single source of guidance on how fair value is measured. IFRS 13 is applied when fair value measurements or disclosures are required or permitted by other IFRSs. The application of IFRS 13 has not materially impacted the fair value measurements carried out by the Group. IFRS 13 also requires specific disclosures on fair values, some of which replace existing disclosure requirements in other standards, including IFRS 7 'Financial Instruments: Disclosures'.
At the date of authorisation of these financial statements, there were a number of new standards, amendments to existing standards and interpretations in issue that have not been applied in preparing these consolidated financial statements. The Group has no plan to adopt these standards earlier than the effective date.
— IFRS 10 'Consolidated Financial Statements';
Effective for the year ending 31 October 2017:
— IFRS 15 'Revenue from Contracts with Customers'.
— IFRS 9 'Financial Instruments' – final standard, addressing the accounting for financial assets and liabilities including classification and measurement, impairment, hedge accounting and own credit.
The Directors are currently considering the potential impact arising from the future adoption of these standards and interpretations listed above.
The consolidated financial statements incorporate the financial statements of the Company and all its subsidiary undertakings made up to 31 October each year. Subsidiaries are entities where the Company has the power to govern the financial and operating policies, generally accompanying a shareholding of more than one-half of the voting rights. The existence and effect of potential voting rights that are currently exercisable or convertible are considered when assessing whether the Group controls another entity.
The results of subsidiaries acquired or disposed of during the year are included in the consolidated income statement from the effective date of acquisition or up to the effective date of disposal, as appropriate.
Where necessary, adjustments are made to the financial statements of subsidiaries to bring the accounting policies used into line with those used by the Group.
All intra-group transactions, balances and unrealised gains on transactions are eliminated on consolidation. Unrealised losses are also eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of an impairment of the assets transferred.
The purchase method of accounting is used to account for the acquisition of subsidiaries by the Group. The consideration transferred for the acquisition is measured as the fair value of the assets transferred, the liabilities incurred to the former owners of the acquiree and the equity instruments issued by the Group. Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed in a business combination are measured initially at their fair values at the date of acquisition. Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquisition over the fair value of the Group's share of net identifiable assets including intangible assets of the acquired entity at the date of acquisition. Costs attributable to an acquisition are expensed in the consolidated income statement under the heading "Other expenses".
IFRS 8 'Operating Segments' ("IFRS 8") requires operating segments to be identified based upon the Group's internal reporting to the chief operating decision maker ("CODM") to make decisions about resources to be allocated to segments and to assess their performance. The CODM is the person or group that allocates resources to and assesses the performance of the operating segments of an entity. The Group has determined that its CODM is the Executive Directors.
A business segment is a distinguishable group of assets and operations, reflected in the way that the Group manages its business, that is subject to risks and returns that are different from those of other business segments. The Group's net assets, revenue and profit before tax are attributable to one principal activity, the provision of self-storage, in two geographical reporting segments, the United Kingdom and France.
Segment results, assets and liabilities include items directly attributable to segments as well as those that can be allocated on a reasonable basis.
Revenue represents amounts derived from the provision of self-storage services (rental space, customer goods insurance and consumables) which fall within the Group's activities provided in the normal course of business, net of discounts, VAT (where applicable) and other sales related taxes.
Rental income is recognised over the period for which the space is occupied by the customer on a time apportionment basis. No revenue is recognised if there are significant uncertainties regarding recovery of the consideration due. Insurance income is recognised over the period for which the space is occupied by the customer on a time apportionment basis.
The portion of insurance premiums on occupied space that relates to unexpired risks at the balance sheet date is reported as unearned premium liability in other payables. Income earned on the sales of consumable items is recognised at the point of sale.
Income for the sale of assets and consumables is recognised when the significant risks and rewards have been transferred to the buyer. For property sales this is generally at the point of completion. Where any aspect of consideration is conditional then the revenue associated with that conditional item is deferred.
Income from insurance claims is recognised when it is virtually certain of being received.
The Group defines exceptional items to be those that warrant, by virtue of their nature, size or frequency, separate disclosure on the face of the income statement where this enhances the understanding of the Group's financial performance.
The individual financial statements for each company are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which it operates (its functional currency). For the purposes of the consolidated financial statements, the results and financial position of the Group are expressed in Sterling, which is the presentational currency of the Group.
Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency at the rates of exchange prevailing on the dates of the transactions. At each balance sheet date, monetary assets and liabilities that are denominated in foreign currencies are retranslated at the rates prevailing on the balance sheet date. Non-monetary assets and liabilities carried at fair value that are denominated in foreign currencies are translated at the rates prevailing at the date when the fair value was determined. Gains and losses arising on retranslation are included in the income statement for the period, except for exchange differences arising on non-monetary assets and liabilities where the changes in fair value are recognised directly in equity.
On consolidation, the assets and liabilities of the Group's overseas operations are translated into the Group's presentational currency at exchange rates prevailing on the balance sheet date. Income and expense items are translated at the average exchange rates for the period. Exchange differences arising are classified as equity and are recognised as a separate component of equity, within the translation reserve. Such translation differences are recognised as income or expense in the period in which the operation is disposed of.
Borrowing costs directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of qualifying assets, which are assets that necessarily take a substantial period of time to get ready for their intended use or sale, are included within the cost of those assets, until such time as the assets are substantially ready for their intended use or sale. Investment income earned on the temporary investment of specific borrowings pending their expenditure on qualifying assets is deducted from the borrowing costs eligible for capitalisation.
All other borrowing costs are recognised in the income statement in the period in which they are incurred.
Investment properties are those properties owned by the Group that are held to earn rental income. Investment properties are initially measured at cost, including related transaction and borrowing costs. After initial recognition, investment properties are held at fair value based on a market valuation by professionally qualified external valuers at each balance sheet date.
The fair value of investment properties reflects, among other things, rental income from current leases and assumptions about rental income from future leases in the light of current market conditions. The fair value also reflects, on a similar basis, any cash outflows that could be expected in respect of the property. Some of these outflows are recognised as a liability, including finance lease liabilities in respect of leasehold land and buildings classified as investment properties; others, including contingent rent payments, are not recognised in the balance sheet.
Land and properties held under operating leases are classified and accounted for by the Group as investment property in accordance with IAS 40 when the rest of the definition of an investment property is met. In such cases, the operating leases concerned are accounted for as if they were finance leases. For investment properties held under leases that are classified as finance leases, the properties are initially recognised at the lower of fair value of the property and the present value of the minimum lease payments. An equivalent amount is recognised as a finance lease liability. After initial recognition, leasehold properties classified as investment properties are held at fair value, and the obligation to the lessor for the buildings element of the leasehold is included in the balance sheet at the present value of the minimum lease payments. Depreciation is provided on the minimum lease payment valuation over the lease term.
Gains or losses arising on changes in the fair value of investment properties at the balance sheet date are recognised in the income statement in the period in which they arise.
Gains or losses on sale of investment properties are calculated as the difference between the consideration received and fair value estimated at the previous balance sheet date.
If an investment property or part of an investment property becomes owner occupied, it is reclassified as property, plant and equipment, and its fair value at the date of reclassification becomes its cost for accounting purposes.
Property, plant and equipment not classified as investment properties or investment properties under construction is stated at historical cost less accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment loss. Historical cost comprises the purchase price and costs directly incurred in bringing the asset into use.
Assets' residual values and useful lives are reviewed and, if appropriate, adjusted at each balance sheet date. If the carrying amount of an asset is greater than the recoverable amount then the carrying amount is written down immediately to the recoverable amount.
Depreciation is charged so as to write off the cost of an asset less estimated residual value of each asset over its expected useful life using the straight line method. The principal rates are as follows:
| Owner occupied buildings over the shorter of the remaining lease period and occupied period | 2% per annum |
|---|---|
| Motor vehicles | 20–25% per annum |
| Computer hardware and software | 15–33% per annum |
| Fixtures, fittings, signs and partitioning | 10% per annum |
The gain or loss arising on the retirement or disposal of an asset is determined as the difference between the net sales proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset and is recognised in the income statement on disposal.
At each balance sheet date, the Group reviews the carrying amounts of its tangible assets to determine whether there is any indication that those assets have suffered an impairment loss. If any such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is estimated in order to determine the extent of the impairment loss (if any). Where the asset does not generate cash flows that are independent from other assets, the Group estimates the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs.
The recoverable amount is deemed to be the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset for which the estimates of future cash flows have not been adjusted.
If the recoverable amount of an asset (or cash-generating unit) is estimated to be less than its carrying amount, the carrying amount of the asset (or cash-generating unit) is reduced to its recoverable amount. An impairment loss is recognised as an expense immediately.
A reversal of an impairment loss is recognised as income immediately.
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost net realisable value. Cost comprises all costs of purchase and other costs incurred in bringing the inventories to their present location and condition. Cost is calculated using the weighted average method. Net realisable value represents the estimated selling price less directly associated costs. Provision is made for slow-moving or obsolete stock, calculated on the basis of sales trends observed in the year.
Trade and other receivables are stated at fair value, being cost less provision for impairment where there is evidence that not all amounts will be recoverable. A provision for impairment of trade receivables is established when there is objective evidence that the Group will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the original terms of the receivables.
Significant financial difficulties of the debtor, probability that the debtor will enter bankruptcy or financial reorganisation and default or delinquency in payments (more than 28 days overdue) are considered indicators that trade receivable is impaired. The amount of the provision is the difference between the asset's carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows, discounted at the original effective interest rate. The carrying amount of the asset is reduced through the use of an allowance account and the amount of the loss is recognised in the income statement within "administrative expenses". When a trade receivable is uncollectable, it is written off against the allowance account for trade receivables.
Cash and cash equivalents represent only liquid assets with original maturity of 90 days or less. Bank overdrafts that cannot be offset against other cash balances are shown within borrowings in current liabilities on the balance sheet.
Trade and other payables are initially recognised at fair value. Subsequently they are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method.
Assets held under finance leases are recognised as assets of the Group at their fair value or, if lower, at the present value of the minimum lease payments, each determined at the inception of the lease. The corresponding liability to the lessor is included in the balance sheet as a finance lease obligation. Lease payments are apportioned between finance charges and the reduction of the lease obligation so as to achieve a constant rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability.
Finance charges are charged directly against income, unless they are directly attributable to qualifying assets, in which case they are capitalised in accordance with the Group's general policy on borrowing costs.
Rentals payable under operating leases are charged to income on a straight line basis over the term of the relevant lease.
Interest-bearing bank loans and overdrafts are recorded at fair value, net of directly attributable transaction costs. Finance charges, including premiums payable on settlement or redemption and direct issue costs, are accounted for on an accruals basis in the income statement using the effective interest method and are included within the carrying amount of the instrument to the extent that they are not settled in the period in which they arise. Where fees are payable in relation to raising debt the costs are disclosed in the cash flow statement within financing activities. Where payments are made to exit or modify derivative financial instruments, these costs are disclosed in the cash flow statement within financing activities.
Issuance costs incurred on re-financing are offset against the carrying value of borrowings, unless they do not solely relate to the issuance of the new facility, in which case they are recognised as part of the gain or loss on the cancellation of the original facility.
The Group uses derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps, cross currency swaps and foreign exchange swaps, to hedge risks associated with fluctuations on borrowings and foreign operations transactions. Such derivatives are initially recognised and measured at fair value on the date a derivative contract is entered into and subsequently re-measured at fair value at each reporting date. The gain or loss on re-measurement is taken to finance expense in the income statement except where the derivative is designated as an effective cash flow hedging instrument. Interest costs for the period relating to derivative financial instruments, which economically hedge borrowings, are recognised within interest payable on bank loans and overdraft. Other fair value movements on derivative financial instruments are recognised within fair value movement of derivatives. Designation as part of an effective hedge relationship occurs at inception of a hedge relationship.
Financial assets are classified as financial assets at fair value through profit or loss and loans and receivables as appropriate. The Group determines the classification of its assets at initial recognition.
Financial assets are derecognised only when the contractual right to the cash flows from the financial asset expire or the Group transfers substantially all risks and rewards of ownership. Financial assets consist of loans and receivables and derivatives.
Financial assets recognised as trade and other receivables are classified as loans and receivables. They are recognised initially at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost less provision for impairment.
Cash and cash equivalents are also classified as loans and receivables. They are subsequently measured at amortised cost. Cash and cash equivalents includes cash in hand, deposits at call with banks and other short-term highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less.
At each balance sheet date the Group assesses whether there is objective evidence that a financial asset or group of assets is impaired. If there is objective evidence the asset is impaired, the amount of the loss is measured as the difference between the assets carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows discounted at the financial assets original effective interest rate. The carrying amount of the asset is reduced through use of an allowance account. The amount of the loss is recognised in the income statement.
Liabilities within the scope of IAS 39 are classified as financial liabilities at fair value through the profit or loss or other liabilities, as appropriate.
A financial liability is derecognised when the obligation under the liability is discharged or cancelled or expires. All loans and borrowings are classified as other liabilities. Initial recognition is at fair value and subsequently at amortised cost. After initial recognition, interest-bearing loans and borrowings are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method.
Financial liabilities included within trade and other payables are recognised initially at fair value and subsequently at amortised cost. The fair value of a non-interest bearing liability is its discounted repayment amount. If the due date of the liability is less than one year, discounting is omitted.
For the purpose of hedge accounting, hedges are classified as:
— cash flow hedges when hedging exposure to variability in cash flows that is either attributable to a particular risk associated with a recognised asset or liability or a forecast transaction.
Changes in the fair value of derivative financial instruments that are designated as effective hedges of future cash flows are recognised directly in equity and the ineffective portion is recognised immediately in the income statement. If the cash flow hedge of a firm commitment or forecast transaction results in the recognition of an asset or a liability, then, at the time the non-financial asset or liability is recognised, the associated gains or losses on the derivative that had previously been recognised in equity are included in the initial measurement of the asset or liability. For hedges that do not result in the recognition of an asset or a liability, amounts deferred in equity are recognised in the income statement in the same period in which the hedged item affects net profit or loss.
Hedge accounting is discontinued when the hedging instrument expires or is sold, terminated or exercised or no longer qualifies for hedge accounting. At that time, any cumulative gain or loss on the hedging instrument recognised in equity is retained in equity until the forecast transaction occurs. If a hedged transaction is no longer expected to occur, the net cumulative gain or loss recognised in equity is transferred to the income statement for the period.
Provisions are recognised when the Group has a present obligation as a result of a past event, it is probable that an outflow of resources will be required to settle that obligation and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation.
The tax credit represents the sum of the tax currently payable and deferred tax.
The tax currently payable is based on taxable profit for the year. Taxable profit differs from net profit as reported in the income statement because it excludes items of income or expense that are taxable or deductible in other years and it further excludes items that are never taxable or deductible. The Group's liability for current tax is calculated using tax rates for that period that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the balance sheet date.
Deferred tax is provided on items that may become taxable at a later date, on the difference between the balance sheet value and the tax base value, on an undiscounted basis. The carrying amount of deferred tax assets is reviewed at each balance sheet date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profits will be available to allow all or part of the asset to be recovered.
Payments to defined contribution retirement benefit schemes are charged as an expense as they fall due. Payments made to state-managed retirement benefit schemes are dealt with as payments to defined contribution schemes where the Group's obligations under the schemes are equivalent to those arising in a defined contribution retirement benefit scheme.
Ordinary shares are classified as equity.
Costs directly attributable to the issue of new ordinary shares are shown in equity as a deduction, net of tax, from the proceeds.
Share based incentives are provided to all employees under the Group's bonus share plan, performance share plan and employee Sharesave schemes. The Group recognises a compensation cost in respect of these schemes that is based on the fair value of the awards, measured using Black-Scholes, Binomial and Monte Carlo valuation methodologies. For equity-settled schemes, the fair value is determined at the date of grant and is not subsequently re-measured unless the conditions on which the award was granted are modified. For cash-settled schemes, the fair value is determined at the date of grant and is re-measured at each balance sheet date until the liability is settled. Generally, the compensation cost is recognised on a straight line basis over the vesting period. Adjustments are made to reflect expected and actual forfeitures during the vesting period due to the failure to satisfy service conditions or non-market performance conditions.
The preparation of consolidated financial statements under IFRS requires management to make estimates and assumptions that may affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, income and expenses. Actual outcomes may therefore differ from these estimates and assumptions. The estimates and assumptions that have significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year are discussed below.
The Group values its self-storage centres using a discounted cash flow methodology which is based on projections of net operating income. Principal assumptions and management's underlying estimation of the fair value of those relate to: stabilised occupancy levels; expected future growth in storage rental income and operating costs; maintenance requirements; capitalisation rate; and discount rates. A more detailed explanation of the background and methodology adopted in the valuation of the investment properties is set out in note 11 to the financial statements.
Deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that taxable profits will be available against which available losses and timing differences can be utilised as set out in note 21.
The carrying value for deferred tax assets is reviewed at each balance sheet date.
Financial risk management is an integral part of the way the Group is managed. In the course of its business, the Group is exposed primarily to foreign exchange risk, interest rate risk, liquidity risk and credit risk. The overall aim of the Group's financial risk management policies is to minimise potential adverse effects on financial performance and net asset values ("NAV"). The Group manages the financial risks within policies and operating parameters approved by the Board of Directors and does not enter into speculative transactions. Treasury activities are managed centrally under a framework of policies and procedures approved and monitored by the Board. These objectives are to protect the assets of the Group and to identify and then manage financial risk. In applying these policies, the Group will utilise derivative instruments, but only for risk management purposes.
The principal financial risks facing the Group are described below.
The Group finances its operations through a mixture of retained profits, issued share capital and bank borrowings. The Group borrows in Sterling, Euro and US Dollars at floating rates and, where necessary, uses interest rate swaps to convert these to fixed rates (see note 19) to generate the preferred interest rate profile and to manage its exposure to interest rate fluctuations. A 1% change in interest rates would have a £1.5 million (FY2013: £0.4 million) impact on net interest. This sensitivity impact has been prepared by determining average floating interest rates and flexing these against average floating rate deposits and borrowings by major currency area over the course of the year.
The Group's policy on liquidity risk is to ensure that sufficient cash is available to fund ongoing operations without the need to carry significant net debt over the medium term. The Group's principal borrowing facilities are provided by a Group of core relationship banks in the form of term loans and overdrafts. The quantum of committed borrowing facilities available to the Group is reviewed regularly and is designed to exceed forecast peak gross debt levels. Further details of the Group's borrowing facilities, including the repayment profile of existing borrowings and the amount of undrawn committed borrowing facilities, are set out in note 18.
Credit risk arises on financial instruments such as trade receivables and short-term bank deposits. Policies and procedures exist to ensure that customers have an appropriate credit history and account customers are given credit limits that are monitored. Short-term bank deposits are executed only with A-rated or above authorised counterparties based on ratings issued by the major rating agencies. Counterparty exposure positions are monitored regularly so that credit exposures to any one counterparty are within predetermined limits. Overall, the Group considers that it is not exposed to a significant amount of credit risk. The amount of trade receivables outstanding at the year end does not represent the maximum exposure to operational credit risk due to the normal patterns of supply and payment over the course of a year. Based on management information collected as at month ends the maximum level of net trade receivables at any one point during the year was £10.1 million (FY2013: £9.4 million).
The Group operates internationally and is exposed to foreign exchange risk in respect of the Euro and US Dollars. Foreign exchange risk arises from future commercial transactions, recognised assets and liabilities and net investments in foreign operations.
To manage foreign exchange risk arising from future commercial transactions and recognised assets and liabilities, the Group uses forward contracts. The Group's treasury risk management policy is to enter into forward contracts for between 60% and 70% of anticipated profits in Euros for the subsequent 12 to 24 months, in order to minimise the foreign exchange exposure on its foreign operations profits.
The Group has investments in foreign operations in France, whose net assets are exposed to foreign currency translation risk. Currency exposure arising from the net assets of the Group's foreign operations is managed primarily through borrowings denominated in the relevant foreign currencies.
At 31 October 2014, if Sterling had weakened by 10% against the Euro with all other variables held constant, post-tax profit for the year would have been £0.9 million lower (FY2013: £1.5 million higher), mainly as a result of foreign exchange gains/losses on translation of Euro receivables and financial assets at fair value through profit or loss. Equity would have been £10.3 million higher (FY2013: £13.4 million higher), arising primarily on translation of Euro-denominated net assets held by subsidiary companies with a Euro functional currency.
The Group is not exposed to significant transaction foreign exchange risk as purchases are invoiced in either Sterling or Euros.
The Group holds US Dollar denominated loan notes totalling \$112.9 million and as such is exposed to foreign exchange risk on these notes. The foreign exchange risk relating to the notes has been fully hedged at 31 October 2014.
Following a review during the year of the Group's hedge accounting procedures in the light of recent accounting developments, management decided to de-designate the hedge relationship and cease hedge accounting for the Group's cross currency swaps. As a result, previous amounts recorded in the hedge reserve have been recycled to the income statement during the year, and the Group is no longer exposed to hedge accounting risk.
The Group's objectives when managing capital are to safeguard the Group's ability to continue as a going concern in order to provide returns for shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders and to maintain an optimal capital structure to reduce the cost of capital.
In order to maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Group may adjust the amount of dividends paid to shareholders, return capital to shareholders, issue new shares or sell assets to reduce debt. Being a Real Estate Investment Trust ("REIT"), the Group is required to distribute as a dividend a minimum of 90% of its property rental income to shareholders. This is factored into the Group's capital risk management.
Consistent with others in the industry, the Group monitors capital on the basis of the gearing ratio. This ratio is calculated as net debt divided by total capital. Net debt is calculated as total borrowings (including "current and non-current borrowings" as shown in the consolidated balance sheet) less cash and cash equivalents. Total capital is calculated as equity as shown in the consolidated balance sheet plus net debt.
The gearing ratios at 31 October 2014 and 2013 were as follows:
| 2014 £'m |
2013 £'m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Total borrowings (excluding derivatives) | 315.6 | 398.6 |
| Less: cash and cash equivalents (note 16) | (15.3) | (15.8) |
| Net debt | 300.3 | 382.8 |
| Total equity | 408.0 | 345.9 |
| Total capital | 708.3 | 728.7 |
| Gearing ratio | 42% | 53% |
The Group considers that a loan to value ("LTV") ratio, defined as gross debt (excluding finance leases) as a proportion of the valuation of investment properties and investment properties under construction (excluding finance leases), of circa 40% represents an appropriate medium-term capital structure objective. The Group's LTV ratio was 37% at 31 October 2014.
The Group has complied with all of the covenants on its banking facilities during the year.
The segmental information presented has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of IFRS 8. The Group's revenue, profit before income tax and net assets are attributable to one activity: the provision of self-storage accommodation and related services. Segmental information is presented in respect of the Group's geographical segments. This is based on the Group's management and internal reporting structure.
Safestore is organised and managed in two operating segments, based on geographical areas, being the United Kingdom and France.
The chief operating decision maker, being the Executive Directors, identified in accordance with the requirements of IFRS 8, assesses the performance of the operating segments on the basis of adjusted EBITDA.
The operating profits and assets include items directly attributable to a segment as well as those that can be allocated on a reasonable basis.
| Year ended 31 October 2014 | UK £'m |
France £'m |
Group £'m |
|---|---|---|---|
| Continuing operations | |||
| Revenue | 71.8 | 26.1 | 97.9 |
| EBITDA before exceptional items, change in fair values of derivatives, gain on investment properties, | |||
| depreciation and contingent rent | 36.7 | 16.3 | 53.0 |
| Exceptional items | (1.0) | — | (1.0) |
| Change in fair value of derivative | — | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Contingent rent and depreciation | (1.1) | (0.6) | (1.7) |
| Operating profit before gain on investment properties | 34.6 | 16.9 | 51.5 |
| Gain on investment properties | 21.6 | 2.5 | 24.1 |
| Operating profit | 56.2 | 19.4 | 75.6 |
| Net finance expense | (18.8) | (4.4) | (23.2) |
| Profit before tax | 37.4 | 15.0 | 52.4 |
| Total assets | 603.6 | 201.2 | 804.8 |
| Year ended 31 October 2013 | UK £'m |
France £'m |
Group £'m |
| Continuing operations | |||
| Revenue | 70.2 | 25.9 | 96.1 |
| EBITDA before exceptional items, change in fair values of derivatives, gain on investment properties, | |||
| depreciation and contingent rent | 34.8 | 16.0 | 50.8 |
| Exceptional items | (1.8) | 1.1 | (0.7) |
| Change in fair value of derivative | — | (1.3) | (1.3) |
| Contingent rent and depreciation | (0.6) | (0.5) | (1.1) |
| Operating profit before gain on investment properties | 32.4 | 15.3 | 47.7 |
| Gain on investment properties | 16.7 | 4.8 | 21.5 |
| Operating profit | 49.1 | 20.1 | 69.2 |
| Net finance expense | (16.1) | (4.5) | (20.6) |
| Profit before tax | 33.0 | 15.6 | 48.6 |
| Total assets | 615.1 | 215.3 | 830.4 |
Inter-segment transactions are entered into under the normal commercial terms and conditions that would also be available to unrelated third parties. There is no material impact from inter-segment transactions on the Group's results.
| Note | 2014 £'m |
2013 £'m |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Finance costs | |||
| Interest payable on bank loans and overdraft | (13.6) | (18.3) | |
| Amortisation of debt issuance costs on bank loan | 18 | (0.1) | (0.1) |
| Underlying finance charges | (13.7) | (18.4) | |
| Interest on obligations under finance leases | (4.2) | (5.0) | |
| Fair value movement of derivatives | (0.8) | — | |
| Recycling of hedge reserve | (3.4) | — | |
| Net exchange losses | (3.7) | — | |
| Exceptional finance expense | (2.1) | — | |
| Total finance cost | (27.9) | (23.4) | |
| Finance income | |||
| Fair value movement of derivatives | 4.5 | 2.8 | |
| Unwinding of discount on CGS receivable | 0.2 | — | |
| Total finance income | 4.7 | 2.8 | |
| Net finance costs | (23.2) | (20.6) |
Exceptional finance costs of £2.1 million were incurred in respect of the Group's debt refinancing in January 2014.
Included within interest payable of £13.6 million (FY2013: £18.3 million) is £1.3 million (FY2013: £2.3 million) of interest relating to derivative financial instruments that are economically hedging the Group's borrowings. The total change in fair value of derivatives reported within net finance costs for the year is a net gain of £3.7 million (FY2013: £2.8 million).
| Total exceptional costs | (1.0) | (0.7) |
|---|---|---|
| Other exceptional Items | (0.2) | (0.3) |
| VAT and REIT related costs | — | (0.3) |
| Insurance proceeds | — | 1.6 |
| Restructuring costs | (0.8) | (1.7) |
| 2014 £'m |
2013 £'m |
Restructuring costs of £0.8 million (FY2013: £1.7 million) were incurred primarily in respect of organisational changes during the year, which were a fundamental element of the business' strategy.
The insurance proceeds recognised in the comparative period relate to claims for property damage and consequential losses arising from the December 2010 fire at the La Défense store in Paris.
The following items have been charged/(credited) in arriving at operating profit:
| Notes | 2014 £'m |
2013 £'m |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Staff costs | 26 | 17.9 | 17.2 |
| Inventories: | |||
| – cost of inventories recognised as an expense (included in cost of sales) | 14 | 0.8 | 1.1 |
| Depreciation on property, plant and equipment: | |||
| – owned assets | 12 | 0.5 | 0.4 |
| Gain on investment properties | 11 | (24.1) | (21.5) |
| Repairs and maintenance expenditure on investment properties | 2.4 | 2.2 | |
| Trade receivables impairment | 15 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
During the year, the Group (including its overseas subsidiaries) obtained the following services from the Company's auditors at costs detailed below:
| 2014 £'m |
2013 £'m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Audit services | ||
| Fees payable to Company's auditors and their associates for the audit of the parent company and consolidated financial statements |
0.1 | 0.1 |
| Fees payable to Company's auditors and their associates for the audit of the Company's subsidiaries pursuant to legislation | 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Total audit fees | 0.2 | 0.3 |
| Fees for other services | ||
| Tax services | — | 0.2 |
| Transaction services | 0.4 | — |
| Total | 0.6 | 0.5 |
Non-audit services for 2014 relate wholly to advice in respect of property transactions, paid to the Company's current auditor, Deloitte LLP, prior to appointment as auditor during the year.
The prior year non-audit services relate to fees paid to the previous auditor, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, for advice in respect of the Group's conversion to a REIT.
Analysis of tax (charge)/credit in the year:
| Tax (charge)/credit | (5.6) | 59.9 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | (4.7) | 60.8 | |
| – adjustment in respect of prior year | (1.1) | 0.9 | |
| – current year, including exceptional credit of £nil (FY2013: £63.2 million) | (3.6) | 59.9 | |
| Deferred tax: | |||
| (0.9) | (0.9) | ||
| – adjustment in respect of prior year | — | 0.2 | |
| – tax in respect of overseas subsidiaries | (0.9) | (1.1) | |
| – UK corporation tax | — | — | |
| Current tax: | |||
| Note | £'m | £'m | |
| 2014 | 2013 |
The tax for the period is lower (FY2013: lower) than the standard effective rate of corporation tax in the UK for the year ended 31 October 2014 of 21.8% (FY2013: 23.4%). The differences are explained below:
| 2014 £'m |
2013 £'m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Profit before tax | 52.4 | 48.6 |
| Profit on ordinary activities multiplied by standard rate of corporation tax in the UK of 21.8% (FY2013: 23.4%) | 11.4 | 11.4 |
| Effect of: | ||
| – permanent differences | (0.5) | (6.3) |
| – profits from the tax exempt business | (8.1) | (3.2) |
| – difference from overseas tax rates | 1.7 | 1.7 |
| – losses not recognised in the year | — | 0.8 |
| – adjustments in respect of prior years | 1.1 | (1.1) |
| – release of UK deferred tax arising on the conversion to REIT | — | (63.2) |
| Tax charge/(credit) | 5.6 | (59.9) |
The Group is an REIT. As a result the Group is exempt from UK corporation tax on the profits and gains from its qualifying rental business in the UK provided that it meets certain conditions. Non-qualifying profits and gains of the Group remain subject to corporation tax as normal. The Group monitors its compliance with the REIT conditions. There have been no breaches of the conditions to date.
The deferred tax credit of £60.8 million for the year ended 31 October 2013 comprises an exceptional credit of £63.2 million which arose from the release of UK deferred tax following the REIT conversion and a charge of £2.4 million in respect of the French business.
The main rate of corporation tax in the UK reduced from 23% to 21% with effect from 1 April 2014 and will further reduce to 20% from 1 April 2015. Accordingly the Group's results for this accounting period are taxed at an effective rate of 21.8%. Due to the Group's REIT status there will be no deferred taxation impact in respect of the changes in taxation rates.
The dividend paid in 2014 was £12.5 million (6.05 pence per share) (FY2013: £10.6 million (5.65 pence per share)). A dividend in respect of the year ended 31 October 2014 of 5.30 pence (FY2013: 3.90 pence) per share, amounting to a final dividend of £11.0 million (FY2013: £7.3 million), is to be proposed at the AGM on 19 March 2015. The ex-dividend date will be 12 March 2015 and the record date will be 13 March 2015 with an intended payment date of 8 April 2015. The final dividend has not been included as a liability at 31 October 2014.
The PID element of the final dividend is 2.65 pence (FY2013: 3.90 pence), making the PID payable for the year 4.80 pence (FY2013: 4.08 pence) per share.
Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing the profit/(loss) attributable to equity holders of the Company by the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue during the year excluding ordinary shares held as treasury shares. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by adjusting the weighted average number of ordinary shares to assume conversion of all dilutive potential shares. The Company has one category of dilutive potential ordinary shares: share options. For the share options, a calculation is done to determine the number of shares that could have been acquired at fair value (determined as the average annual market price of the Company's shares) based on the monetary value of the subscription rights attached to the outstanding share options. The number of shares calculated as above is compared with the number of shares that would have been issued assuming the exercise of the share options.
| Year ended 31 October 2014 | Year ended 31 October 2013 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings £'m |
Shares million |
Pence per share |
Earnings £'m |
Shares million |
Pence per share |
|
| Basic | 46.8 | 202.1 | 23.2 | 108.5 | 187.9 | 57.8 |
| Dilutive securities | — | 1.5 | (0.2) | — | 1.3 | (0.5) |
| Diluted | 46.8 | 203.6 | 23.0 | 108.5 | 189.2 | 57.3 |
Adjusted earnings per share represents profit after tax adjusted for the valuation movement on investment properties, exceptional items, change in fair value of derivatives and the associated tax thereon. The Directors consider that these alternative measures provide useful information on the performance of the Group.
EPRA earnings and earnings per share before non-recurring items, movements on revaluations of investment properties and changes in the fair value of derivatives have been disclosed to give a clearer understanding of the Group's underlying trading performance.
| Year ended 31 October 2014 | Year ended 31 October 2013 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings £'m |
Shares million |
Pence per share |
Earnings £'m |
Shares million |
Pence per share |
|
| Basic | 46.8 | 202.1 | 23.2 | 108.5 | 187.9 | 57.8 |
| Adjustments: | ||||||
| Gain on investment properties | (24.1) | — | (12.0) | (21.5) | — | (11.4) |
| Exceptional operating items | 1.0 | — | 0.5 | 0.7 | — | 0.3 |
| Exceptional finance costs | 2.1 | — | 1.0 | — | — | — |
| Unwinding of discount on CGS receivable | (0.2) | — | (0.1) | — | — | — |
| Net exchange losses | 3.7 | — | 1.8 | — | — | — |
| Change in fair value of derivatives and recycling | ||||||
| of hedge reserve | (1.5) | — | (0.7) | (1.5) | — | (0.8) |
| Tax adjustments | 1.4 | — | 0.7 | (63.6) | — | (33.9) |
| Adjusted | 29.2 | 202.1 | 14.4 | 22.6 | 187.9 | 12.0 |
| EPRA adjusted | ||||||
| Depreciation of leasehold properties | (4.9) | — | (2.4) | (4.5) | — | (2.4) |
| Tax on leasehold depreciation adjustment | 0.9 | — | 0.5 | 0.6 | — | 0.3 |
| EPRA basic | 25.2 | 202.1 | 12.5 | 18.7 | 187.9 | 9.9 |
| Adjustment for cash tax | 2.1 | — | 1.0 | 2.2 | — | 1.2 |
| Adjusted cash tax earnings1 | 27.3 | 202.1 | 13.5 | 20.9 | 187.9 | 11.1 |
1 Adjusted cash tax earnings is defined as profit or loss for the year before exceptional items, change in fair value of derivatives, gain/loss on investment properties (adjusted for leasehold depreciation), discount unwind on the CGS receivable and the associated tax impacts, as well as exceptional tax items and deferred tax charges.
Gain on investment properties includes depreciation on leasehold properties of £4.9 million (FY2013: £4.5 million) and the related tax thereon of £0.9 million (FY2013: £0.6 million). As an industry standard measure, EPRA earnings is presented. EPRA earnings of £25.2 million (FY2013: £18.7 million) and EPRA earnings per share of 12.5 pence (FY2013: 9.9 pence) are calculated after further adjusting for these items.
| Group | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPRA adjusted income statement (non-statutory) | 2014 £'m |
2013 £'m |
Movement % |
|
| Revenue | 97.9 | 96.1 | 1.9 | |
| Operating expenses (excluding depreciation and contingent rent) | (44.9) | (45.3) | 0.9 | |
| EBITDA before contingent rent | 53.0 | 50.8 | 4.3 | |
| Depreciation and contingent rent | (1.7) | (1.1) | (54.5) | |
| Operating profit before depreciation on leasehold properties | 51.3 | 49.7 | 3.2 | |
| Depreciation on leasehold properties | (4.9) | (4.5) | (8.9) | |
| Operating profit | 46.4 | 45.2 | 2.7 | |
| Net financing costs | (17.9) | (23.4) | 23.5 | |
| Profit before income tax | 28.5 | 21.8 | 30.7 | |
| Income tax | (3.3) | (3.1) | (6.5) | |
| Profit for the year ("EPRA earnings") | 25.2 | 18.7 | 34.8 | |
| Adjusted EPRA earnings per share | 12.5 pence | 9.9 pence | 26.3 | |
| Final dividend per share | 5.3 pence | 3.9 pence | 35.9 |
| Investment property £'m |
Interests in leasehold properties £'m |
Investment property under construction £'m |
Total investment properties £'m |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| As at 1 November 2013 | 724.6 | 55.7 | 5.6 | 785.9 |
| Additions | 3.4 | 3.2 | — | 6.6 |
| Disposals | (41.6) | (1.5) | — | (43.1) |
| Purchase of freehold | 2.9 | (0.3) | — | 2.6 |
| Revaluations | 29.3 | — | (0.3) | 29.0 |
| Depreciation | — | (4.9) | — | (4.9) |
| Exchange movements | (14.6) | (1.2) | — | (15.8) |
| As at 31 October 2014 | 704.0 | 51.0 | 5.3 | 760.3 |
| Investment property £'m |
Interests in leasehold properties £'m |
Investment property under construction £'m |
Total investment properties £'m |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| As at 1 November 2012 | 685.1 | 58.0 | 5.4 | 748.5 |
| Additions | 4.2 | 20.6 | — | 24.8 |
| Disposals | — | (13.4) | — | (13.4) |
| Capital Goods Scheme | (2.2) | — | — | (2.2) |
| Reclassifications | 1.3 | — | — | 1.3 |
| Revaluations | 25.8 | — | 0.2 | 26.0 |
| Adjustment to present value | — | (5.8) | — | (5.8) |
| Depreciation | — | (4.5) | — | (4.5) |
| Exchange movements | 10.4 | 0.8 | — | 11.2 |
| As at 31 October 2013 | 724.6 | 55.7 | 5.6 | 785.9 |
The adjustment to present value on interest in leasehold properties reflects the improved recoverability of input taxation following the implementation of VAT on UK self-storage sales from 1 October 2012.
The Capital Goods Scheme adjustment relates to an increase in the discounted receivable initially recognised as at 31 October 2012.
Gain/(loss) on investment properties comprises:
| 2014 £'m |
2013 £'m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Revaluations | 29.0 | 26.0 |
| Depreciation | (4.9) | (4.5) |
| 24.1 | 21.5 |
| As at 31 October 2014 | 434.3 | 704.0 | 269.7 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Movement in year | (1.2) | (20.6) | (19.4) |
| As at 1 November 2013 | 435.5 | 724.6 | 289.1 |
| All stores | |||
| As at 31 October 2014 | 75.5 | 137.2 | 61.7 |
| Movement in year | — | 3.7 | 3.7 |
| As at 1 November 2013 | 75.5 | 133.5 | 58.0 |
| Leasehold stores | |||
| As at 31 October 2014 | 358.8 | 566.8 | 208.0 |
| Movement in year | (1.2) | (24.3) | (23.1) |
| As at 1 November 2013 | 360.0 | 591.1 | 231.1 |
| Freehold stores | |||
| Cost £'m |
Valuation £'m |
on cost £'m |
|
| Revaluation |
The valuation of £704.0 million (FY2013: £724.6 million) excludes £0.6 million in respect of owner occupied property, which is included within property, plant and equipment. Rental income earned from investment properties for the year ended 31 October 2014 was £80.6 million (FY2013: £78.3 million).
The Group has classified the investment property and investment property under construction, held at fair value, within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. There were no transfers to or from Level 3 during the year.
The freehold and leasehold investment properties have been valued as at 31 October 2014 by external valuers, Cushman & Wakefield LLP ("C&W"). The valuation has been carried out in accordance with the current UK edition of the RICS Valuation – Professional Standards, published by The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors ("the Red Book"). The valuation of each of the investment properties has been prepared on the basis of fair value as a fully equipped operational entity, having regard to trading potential. One non-trading property was valued on the basis of fair value. The valuation has been provided for accounts purposes and, as such, is a Regulated Purpose Valuation as defined in the Red Book. In compliance with the disclosure requirements of the Red Book, C&W has confirmed that:
C&W's valuation report comments on valuation uncertainty resulting from low liquidity in the market for self-storage property. C&W notes that, although there were a number of self-storage transactions in 2007, the only significant transactions since 2007 are:
There have been twelve single store market transactions in the UK since 2010. C&W states that, due to the lack of comparable market information in the self-storage sector, there is greater uncertainty attached to its opinion of value than would be anticipated during a more active market.
The valuation of the operational self-storage facilities has been prepared having regard to trading potential. Cash flow projections have been prepared for all of the properties reflecting estimated absorption, revenue growth and expense inflation. A discounted cash flow method of valuation based on these cash flow projections has been used by C&W to arrive at its opinion of fair value for these properties.
C&W has adopted different approaches for the valuation of the leasehold and freehold assets as follows:
The valuation is based on a discounted cash flow of the net operating income over a ten year period and notional sale of the asset at the end of the tenth year.
Assumptions:
The same methodology has been used as for freeholds, except that no sale of the assets in the tenth year is assumed but the discounted cash flow is extended to the expiry of the lease. The average unexpired term of the Group's UK short-term leasehold properties is 11.11 years (31 October 2013: 12.71 years). The average unexpired term excludes the French commercial leases.
In relation to the French commercial leases, C&W has valued the cash flow projections in perpetuity due to the security of tenure arrangements in that market and the potential compensation arrangements in the event of the landlord wishing to take possession. The valuation treatment is therefore the same as for the freehold properties. The capitalisation rates on these stores reflect the risk of the landlord terminating the lease arrangements.
C&W has valued the stores in development adopting the same methodology as set out above but on the basis of the cash flow projection expected for the store at opening and allowing for the outstanding costs to take each store from its current state to completion and full fit out. C&W has allowed for carry costs and construction contingency, as appropriate.
C&W has assessed the value of each property individually. However, four of the stores in the portfolio are relatively immature and have low initial cash flow. C&W has endeavoured to reflect the nature of the cash flow profile for these properties in its valuation, and the higher associated risks relating to the as yet unproven future cash flow, by adjustment to the capitalisation rates and discount rates adopted. However, immature low cash flow stores of this nature are rarely, if ever, traded individually in the market, unless as part of a distressed sale or similar situation. Although, there is more evidence of immature low cash flow stores being traded as part of a group or portfolio transaction.
C&W considers there to be market uncertainty in the self-storage sector due to the lack of comparable market transactions and information. The degree of uncertainty relating to the four immature stores is greater than in relation to the balance of the properties due to there being even less market evidence that might be available for more mature properties and portfolios.
C&W states that in practice, if an actual sale of the properties were to be contemplated then any immature low cash flow stores would normally be presented to the market for sale lotted or grouped with other more mature assets owned by the same entity, in order to alleviate the issue of negative or low short-term cash flow. This approach would enhance the marketability of the group of assets and assist in achieving the best price available in the market by diluting the cash flow risk.
C&W has not adjusted its opinion of fair value to reflect such a grouping of the immature assets with other properties in the portfolio and all stores have been valued individually. However, C&W highlights the matter to alert the Group to the manner in which the properties might be grouped or lotted in order to maximise their attractiveness to the marketplace.
C&W considers this approach to be a valuation assumption but not a Special Assumption, the latter being an assumption that assumes facts that differ from the actual facts existing at the valuation date and which, if not adopted, could produce a material difference in value.
C&W has not assumed that the entire portfolio of properties owned by the Group would be sold as a single lot and the value for the whole portfolio in the context of a sale as a single lot may differ significantly (either higher or lower) from the aggregate of the individual values for each property in the portfolio, reflecting the lotting assumption described above.
Where stores within the portfolio are expected to close in the short term, C&W has assumed that a proportion of the customer base from these stores will be transferred, at closure, to nearby stores also owned by the Group.
C&W has assumed that the properties that are closing would be sold together with the stores where customers will be transferred to, in the event they were offered to the market. C&W considers this approach to be a valuation assumption but not a Special Assumption, the latter being an assumption that assumes facts that differ from the actual facts existing at the valuation date and which, if not adopted, could produce a material difference in value.
The Group's investment property assets have been valued for the purposes of the financial statements after deducting notional purchaser's costs of 5.8% (UK) and 6.2% to 6.9% (France) of gross value, as if they were sold directly as property assets. The valuation is an asset valuation which is strongly linked to the operating performance of the business. They would have to be sold with the benefit of operational contracts, employment contracts and customer contracts, which would be very difficult to achieve except in a corporate structure.
This approach follows the logic of the valuation methodology in that the valuation is based on a capitalisation of the net operating income after allowing a deduction for operational cost and an allowance for central administration costs. Sale in a corporate structure would result in a reduction in the assumed stamp duty land tax but an increase in other transaction costs reflecting additional due diligence resulting in a reduced notional purchaser's cost of 2.75% of gross value. All the significant sized transactions that have been concluded in the UK in recent years were completed in a corporate structure. The Group therefore instructed C&W to prepare additional valuation advice on the basis of purchaser's cost of 2.75% of gross value which are used for internal management purposes.
All other factors being equal, higher net operating income would lead to an increase in the valuation of a store and an increase in the capitalisation rate or discount rate would result in a lower valuation, and vice versa. Higher assumptions for stabilised occupancy, absorption rate, rental rate and other revenue, and a lower assumption for operating costs, would result in an increase in projected net operating income, and thus an increase in valuation.
| At 31 October 2012 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 2.9 | 3.7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net book value At 31 October 2013 |
0.7 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| At 31 October 2013 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Impairment | — | — | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Disposals | — | (0.2) | — | (0.2) |
| Charge for the year | — | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.4 |
| At 1 November 2012 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 1.2 |
| Accumulated depreciation | ||||
| At 31 October 2013 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 2.7 | 3.7 |
| Reclassification to investment property | — | — | (1.3) | (1.3) |
| Disposals | — | (0.1) | — | (0.1) |
| Additions | — | — | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Cost At 1 November 2012 |
0.8 | 0.3 | 3.8 | 4.9 |
| Owner occupied buildings £'m |
Motor vehicles £'m |
Fixtures and fittings £'m |
Total £'m |
|
| At 31 October 2013 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| Net book value At 31 October 2014 |
0.6 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 1.5 |
| At 31 October 2014 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 2.1 | 2.4 |
| At 1 November 2013 Charge for the year |
0.1 0.1 |
0.1 — |
1.7 0.4 |
1.9 0.5 |
| Accumulated depreciation | ||||
| At 31 October 2014 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 2.9 | 3.9 |
| Disposals | — | — | (0.1) | (0.1) |
| Additions | — | — | 0.3 | 3.7 0.3 |
| Cost | ||||
| buildings £'m |
vehicles £'m |
and fittings £'m |
Total £'m |
|
| At 1 November 2013 | Owner occupied 0.8 |
Motor 0.2 |
Fixtures 2.7 |
EPRA earnings and earnings per share before non-recurring items, movements on revaluations of investment properties and changes in the fair value of derivatives have been disclosed to give a clearer understanding of the Group's underlying trading performance.
The European Public Real Estate Association ("EPRA") has issued recommended bases for the calculation of net assets per share information and these are shown in the table below.
| 2014 £'m |
2013 £'m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Analysis of net asset value: | ||
| Net assets | 408.0 | 345.9 |
| Adjustments to exclude: | ||
| Fair value of derivative financial instruments (net of deferred tax) | 4.2 | 11.0 |
| Deferred tax liabilities on the revaluation of investment properties | 38.8 | 39.3 |
| Adjusted net asset value | 451.0 | 396.2 |
| Basic net assets per share (pence) | 197.1 | 183.7 |
| EPRA basic net assets per share (pence) | 217.9 | 210.4 |
| Diluted net assets per share (pence) | 195.7 | 182.4 |
| EPRA diluted net assets per share (pence) | 216.4 | 208.8 |
| Number | Number | |
| Shares in issue | 206,991,414 | 188,345,784 |
Basic net assets per share is shareholders' funds divided by the number of shares at the year end. Diluted net assets per share is shareholders' funds divided by the number of shares at the year end, adjusted for dilutive share options of 1,466,877 shares (FY2013: 1,297,572 shares). EPRA diluted net assets per share exclude deferred tax liabilities arising on the revaluation of investment properties. The EPRA NAV, which further excludes fair value adjustments for debt and related derivatives net of deferred tax, was £451.0 million (FY2013: £396.2 million), giving EPRA net assets per share of 217.9 pence (FY2013: 210.4 pence). The Directors consider that these alternative measures provide useful information on the performance of the Group.
| Group | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 £'m |
2013 £'m |
Movement % |
|
| Assets | |||
| Non-current assets | 768.3 | 797.4 | (3.6) |
| Current assets | 35.9 | 33.0 | 8.8 |
| Total assets | 804.2 | 830.4 | (3.2) |
| Liabilities | |||
| Current liabilities | (49.7) | (49.2) | (1.0) |
| Non-current liabilities | (303.5) | (385.0) | 21.2 |
| Total liabilities | (353.2) | (434.2) | 18.7 |
| EPRA net asset value | 451.0 | 396.2 | 13.8 |
| EPRA net asset value per share | 217.9 pence | 210.4 pence | 3.6 |
| 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|
| £'m | £'m | |
| Finished goods and goods held for resale | 0.3 | 0.2 |
| Less: provisions for impairment of inventories | (0.1) | (0.1) |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
The Group consumed £0.8 million (FY2013: £1.1 million) of inventories during the year. Inventory write downs were £nil for both the financial years ended 31 October 2014 and 31 October 2013. Inventories of £0.1 million (FY2013: £0.1 million) are carried at fair value less costs to sell. Provisions are made against slow-moving and obsolete stock lines where considered appropriate.
| 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|
| £'m | £'m | |
| Current: | ||
| Trade receivables | 10.1 | 9.0 |
| Less: provision for impairment of receivables | (1.4) | (1.3) |
| Trade receivables – net | 8.7 | 7.7 |
| Other receivables | 6.2 | 3.7 |
| Prepayments and accrued income | 5.3 | 5.7 |
| 20.2 | 17.1 | |
| Movements on the Group provision for impairment of trade receivables are as follows: | ||
| 2014 | 2013 |
| £'m | £'m | |
|---|---|---|
| Provisions for doubtful debts against trade receivables: | ||
| At 1 November | 1.3 | 1.1 |
| Provision for receivables impairment | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Receivables written off during the year as uncollectable | (0.4) | (0.3) |
| At 31 October | 1.4 | 1.3 |
The creation and release of provision for impaired receivables have been included in "administrative expenses" in the income statement.
Trade receivables that are less than 28 days overdue are not considered impaired. As of 31 October 2014, trade receivables of £0.5 million (FY2013: £0.3 million) were past due but not impaired. These relate to a number of customers who benefit from an extension to normal terms and for whom there is no recent history of default. The ageing analysis of these trade receivables is as follows:
| 2014 £'m |
2013 £'m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Up to 28 days overdue | 0.3 | 0.2 |
| Up to 60 days overdue | 0.2 | 0.1 |
The above balances are short term (including other receivables) and therefore the difference between the book value and the fair value of the above receivables is not significant. Consequently these have not been discounted.
As of 31 October 2014, trade receivables of £1.4 million (FY2013: £1.3 million) were impaired and provided for in full. There is no concentration of credit risk with respect to trade receivables as the Group has a large number of customers.
The carrying amounts of the Group's trade and other receivables are denominated in the following currencies:
| 2014 £'m |
2013 £'m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Sterling | 14.8 | 11.2 |
| Euros | 5.4 | 5.9 |
| 20.2 | 17.1 |
Other receivables includes amounts in relation to VAT recoverable on qualifying expenditure in respect of the Capital Goods Scheme. As at 31 October 2014 the Group had a total discounted other receivable of £6.4 million (FY2013: £8.1 million). This is split £4.8 million as non-current assets and £1.6 million as current assets (FY2013: £6.4 million and £1.7 million respectively).
| 2014 £'m |
2013 £'m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Cash at bank and in hand | 15.3 | 15.8 |
| The carrying amounts of the Group's cash and cash equivalents are denominated in the following currencies: | ||
| 2014 £'m |
2013 £'m |
|
| Sterling | 12.3 | 6.5 |
| Euros | 3.0 | 9.3 |
| 15.3 | 15.8 | |
| 17. Trade and other payables | ||
| 2014 £'m |
2013 £'m |
|
| Current: | ||
| Trade payables | 7.0 | 7.4 |
| Other taxes and social security payable | 2.0 | 2.4 |
| Other payables | 2.6 | 3.2 |
| Accruals and deferred income | 25.1 | 21.8 |
| 36.7 | 34.8 | |
| The carrying amounts of the Group's trade and other payables are denominated in the following currencies: | ||
| 2014 £'m |
2013 £'m |
|
| Sterling | 29.9 | 26.9 |
| Euros | 6.8 | 7.9 |
| 36.7 | 34.8 |
| Current | 2014 £'m |
2013 £'m |
|---|---|---|
| Bank loans and overdrafts due within one year or on demand: | ||
| Secured – bank loan | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| 5.0 | 5.0 | |
| 2014 | 2013 | |
| Non-current | £'m | £'m |
| Bank loans and secured notes: | ||
| Secured | 260.2 | 338.6 |
| Debt issue costs | (0.6) | (0.7) |
| 259.6 | 337.9 |
The bank facilities of £206 million and €70 million run to June 2018 and a \$112.9 million US private placement note issue of seven and twelve years has maturities extending to 2019 and 2024. The blended cost of interest on the overall debt is 4.3% per annum.
The bank facilities attract a margin over LIBOR/EURIBOR. Since the January 2014 refinancing, the margin ratchets between 2.25% and 3.25%, by reference to the Group's performance against its interest cover covenant. Approximately 60% of the drawn bank facilities have been hedged at 1.64% (LIBOR) or 0.81% (EURIBOR).
The Company has in issue \$65.6 million (FY2013: \$67.0 million) 5.52% Series A Senior Secured Notes due 2019 and \$47.3 million (FY2013: \$48.0 million) 6.29% Series B Senior Secured Notes due 2024. The proceeds of the US private placement have been fully hedged by cross currency swaps converting the US Dollar exchange risk into £ Sterling.
The bank loans and overdrafts are secured by a fixed charge over the Group's investment property portfolio. As part of the Group's interest rate management strategy, the Group entered into several interest rate swap contracts, details of which are shown in note 19.
Bank loans and secured notes are stated before unamortised issue costs of £0.6 million (FY2013: £0.7 million).
Bank loans and secured notes are repayable as follows:
| Group | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2014 £'m |
2013 £'m |
|
| In one year or less | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Between one and two years | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Between two and five years | 220.6 | 256.9 |
| After more than five years | 29.6 | 71.7 |
| Bank loans and secured notes | 265.2 | 343.6 |
| Unamortised issue costs due after one year | (0.6) | (0.7) |
| 264.6 | 342.9 |
The effective interest rates at the balance sheet date were as follows:
| 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|
| Bank loans (UK term loan) | Quarterly LIBOR plus 2.25% | Quarterly LIBOR plus 3.25% |
| Bank loans (Euro term loan) | Quarterly EURIBOR plus 2.25% | Quarterly EURIBOR plus 3.25% |
| Private placement notes | Weighted average rate of 6.21% | Weighted average rate of 6.21% |
Secured loan notes bear interest at 5.83% on \$65.6 million (FY2013: \$67.0 million) and 6.7375% on \$47.3 million (FY2013: \$48.0 million), as a result of cross currency swap agreements.
The Group has the following undrawn committed borrowing facilities available at 31 October in respect of which all conditions precedent had been met at that date:
| Floating rate | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2014 £'m |
2013 £'m |
|
| Expiring beyond one year | 66.6 | 58.0 |
| The carrying amounts of the Group's borrowings are denominated in the following currencies: | 2014 £'m |
2013 £'m |
| Sterling | 156.0 | 230.0 |
| Euro | 38.6 | 41.9 |
| US Dollar | 70.6 | 71.7 |
| 265.2 | 343.6 |
Financial instruments disclosures are set out below. Additional disclosures are set out in note 2, under Financial risk management.
| 2014 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asset £'m |
Liability £'m |
Asset £'m |
Liability £'m |
|
| Interest rate swaps | — | (1.7) | — | (5.9) |
| Cross currency swaps | — | (3.1) | — | (4.3) |
| Foreign exchange contracts | 0.3 | — | — | (0.8) |
| 0.3 | (4.8) | — | (11.0) |
The fair value of financial instruments that are not traded in an active market, such as over-the-counter derivatives, is determined using valuation techniques. The Group obtains such valuations from counterparties who use a variety of assumptions based on market conditions existing at each balance sheet date.
The fair values of all financial instruments are equal to their book value, with the exception of bank loans and finance lease obligations which are set out below. The carrying value less impairment provision of trade receivables, other receivables and the carrying value of trade payables and other payables approximate their fair value.
The fair value of finance leases is approximately equal to their book value. The fair value of bank loans is calculated as:
| 2014 | 2013 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Book value £'m |
Fair value £'m |
Book value £'m |
Fair value £'m |
||
| Bank loans | 264.6 | 272.0 | 342.9 | 365.6 |
IFRS 13 requires fair value measurements to be recognised using a fair value hierarchy that reflects the significance of the inputs used in the measurements, according to the following levels:
Level 1 – unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 – inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset of liability, either directly or indirectly.
Level 3 – inputs for the asset of liability that are not based on observable market data.
The table below shows the level in the fair value hierarchy into which fair value measurements have been categorised:
| Assets per the balance sheet | 2014 £'m |
2013 £'m |
|---|---|---|
| Derivative financial instruments – Level 2 | 0.3 | — |
| Liabilities per the balance sheet | 2014 £'m |
2013 £'m |
| Derivative financial instruments – Level 2 | 4.8 | 11.0 |
There were no transfers between Levels 1, 2 and 3 fair value measurements during the current or prior year.
Over the life of the Group's derivative financial instruments, the cumulative fair value gain/loss on those instruments will be £nil as it is the Group's intention to hold them to maturity.
The notional principal amounts of the outstanding interest rate swap contracts at 31 October 2014 were £80 million and €45 million (FY2013: £196.7 million and €40 million). At 31 October 2014 the fixed interest rates were Sterling at 1.640% and Euro at 0.8085% (FY2013: Sterling at 1.710% and Euro at 1.361%) and floating rates are at quarterly LIBOR and quarterly EURIBOR. The LIBOR swaps and the EURIBOR swaps expire in June 2018.
The Group restructured its bank borrowing facilities in January 2014, extending the maturity of existing bank facilities from June 2016 to June 2018. As a result, the existing interest rate swap contracts were cancelled, and replaced by new interest rate swap contracts to coincide with the new maturity in June 2018. Settlement payments totalling £4.9 million were made to counterparties in respect of the cancelled contracts. The movement in fair value recognised in the income statement was a net loss of £0.7 million (FY2013: gain of £2.8 million).
At 31 October 2014, the Group had foreign currency swap contracts outstanding for a notional principal amount of €6.0 million maturing on 30 April 2015 and on 31 October 2015. The Group will receive the Sterling equivalent of the notional principal amount at an average exchange rate of €1.2343 to the pound and pay the Sterling equivalent of the average monthly spot rates for the six months. The movement in the fair value recognised in the income statement in the period was a gain of £1.2 million (FY2013: loss of £1.3 million).
The Group entered into cross currency swaps to mitigate the foreign exchange risk arising on future interest payments and the principal repayments arising from the \$65.6 million and \$47.3 million US Secured Senior Notes. These cross currency swaps commenced in May 2012 and terminate in 2019 and 2024 in line with the maturity of the notes. Following a review during the year of the Group's hedge accounting procedures in the light of recent accounting developments, management decided to de-designate the hedge relationship from 1 May 2014 and cease hedge accounting for these cross currency swaps. As a result, previous hedge accounting adjustments totalling £3.4 million have been recycled during the year. The movement in fair value recognised during the period, was a gain of £4.4 million (FY2013: £nil) to the income statement, and a charge of £3.3 million (FY2013: £nil) in other comprehensive income.
| Assets as per balance sheet | Loans and receivables £'m |
Assets at fair value through profit and loss £'m |
Total £'m |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trade receivables and other receivables excluding prepayments | 14.9 | — | 14.9 |
| Derivative financial instruments | — | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 15.3 | — | 15.3 |
| As at 31 October 2014 | 30.2 | 0.3 | 30.5 |
| Liabilities as per balance sheet | Liabilities at fair value through profit and loss £'m |
Other financial liabilities at amortised cost £'m |
Total £'m |
| Borrowings (excluding finance lease liabilities) | — | 264.6 | 264.6 |
| Finance lease liabilities | — | 51.0 | 51.0 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 4.8 | — | 4.8 |
| Trade and other payables | — | 36.7 | 36.7 |
| As at 31 October 2014 | 4.8 | 352.3 | 357.1 |
| Assets as per balance sheet | Loans and receivables £'m |
Assets at fair value through profit and loss £'m |
Total £'m |
| Trade receivables and other receivables excluding prepayments | 11.4 | — | 11.4 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 15.8 | — | 15.8 |
| As at 31 October 2013 | 27.2 | — | 27.2 |
| Liabilities as per balance sheet | Liabilities at fair value through profit and loss £'m |
Other financial liabilities at amortised cost £'m |
Total £'m |
| Borrowings (excluding finance lease liabilities) | — | 342.9 | 342.9 |
| Finance lease liabilities | — | 55.7 | 55.7 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 11.0 | — | 11.0 |
| Trade and other payables | — | 34.8 | 34.8 |
| As at 31 October 2013 | 11.0 | 433.4 | 444.4 |
The interest rate risk profile, after taking account of derivative financial instruments, was as follows:
| 2014 | 2013 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Floating rate £'m |
Fixed rate £'m |
Total £'m |
Floating rate £'m |
Fixed rate £'m |
Total £'m |
||
| Borrowings | 78.5 | 186.1 | 264.6 | 40.3 | 302.6 | 342.9 |
The weighted average interest rate of the fixed rate financial borrowing was 4.61% (FY2013: 5.22%) and the weighted average remaining period for which the rate is fixed was four years for bank borrowings and five/ten years for the notes (FY2013: three years for bank debt; six/eleven for notes).
The table below analyses the Group's financial liabilities and non-settled derivative financial instruments into relevant maturity groupings based on the remaining period at the balance sheet date to the contractual maturity dates. The amounts disclosed in the table are the contractual undiscounted cash flows.
| Less than | One to two | Two to five | More than five years |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| one year | years | years | ||
| £'m | £'m | £'m | £'m | |
| 2014 | ||||
| Borrowings | 15.1 | 20.0 | 243.3 | 38.9 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 5.5 | 5.5 | 15.3 | 10.1 |
| Contractual interest payments and finance lease charges | 8.9 | 8.6 | 22.9 | 40.1 |
| Trade and other payables | 36.7 | — | — | — |
| 66.2 | 34.1 | 281.5 | 89.1 | |
| 2013 | ||||
| Borrowings | 22.1 | 27.8 | 274.4 | 92.1 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 7.2 | 7.2 | 15.6 | 14.7 |
| Contractual interest payments and finance lease charges | 9.2 | 8.8 | 24.1 | 44.2 |
| Trade and other payables | 34.8 | — | — | — |
| 73.3 | 43.8 | 314.1 | 151.0 |
| Minimum lease payments | Present value of minimum lease payments |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 £'m |
2013 £'m |
2014 £'m |
2013 £'m |
|
| Within one year | 8.9 | 9.2 | 8.0 | 8.6 |
| Within two to five years | 31.5 | 32.9 | 23.9 | 26.1 |
| Greater than five years | 40.1 | 44.2 | 19.1 | 21.0 |
| 80.5 | 86.3 | 51.0 | 55.7 | |
| Less: future finance charges on finance leases | (29.5) | (30.6) | — | — |
| Present value of finance lease obligations | 51.0 | 55.7 | 51.0 | 55.7 |
The comparative minimum lease payments have been adjusted to appropriately reflect the profile of lease payments as they fall due.
| 2014 £'m |
2013 £'m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Current | 8.0 | 8.6 |
| Non-current | 43.0 | 47.1 |
| 51.0 | 55.7 |
Deferred tax is calculated in full on temporary differences under the liability method using a tax rate of 20% (FY2013: 20%) for the UK and 33.3% (FY2013: 33.3%) for France. The movement on the deferred tax account was as shown below.
| At 31 October | 37.7 | 36.0 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exchange differences | (3.0) | 2.0 | |
| Released to equity | — | 1.1 | |
| Charge/(credit) to income statement | 8 | 4.7 | (60.8) |
| At 1 November | 36.0 | 93.7 | |
| Note | 2014 £'m |
2013 £'m |
The movements in deferred tax assets and liabilities (prior to the offsetting of balances within the same jurisdiction as permitted by IAS 12) during the period are shown below.
| At 31 October 2014 | 1.7 | 0.3 | 2.0 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exchange differences | (0.3) | — | (0.3) |
| Charged to income statement | (1.0) | — | (1.0) |
| At 1 November 2013 | 3.0 | 0.3 | 3.3 |
| At 31 October 2013 | 3.0 | 0.3 | 3.3 |
| Exchange differences | 0.2 | — | 0.2 |
| Released to equity | — | (1.1) | (1.1) |
| Charged to income statement | (1.4) | (1.5) | (2.9) |
| At 1 November 2012 | 4.2 | 2.9 | 7.1 |
| Deferred tax asset | Tax losses £'m |
Interest swap £'m |
Total £'m |
| At 31 October 2014 | 38.8 | 0.9 | 39.7 |
| Exchange differences | (3.3) | — | (3.3) |
| Charge to income statement | 2.8 | 0.9 | 3.7 |
| At 1 November 2013 | 39.3 | — | 39.3 |
| At 31 October 2013 | 39.3 | — | 39.3 |
| Exchange differences | 2.2 | — | 2.2 |
| Credit to income statement | (63.5) | (0.2) | (63.7) |
| At 1 November 2012 | 100.6 | 0.2 | 100.8 |
| Deferred tax liability | Revaluation of investment properties £'m |
Other timing differences £'m |
Total £'m |
The deferred tax liability due after more than one year is £39.7 million (FY2013: £39.3 million).
As at 31 October 2014, the Group had trading losses of £5.6 million (FY2013: £3.1 million) and capital losses of £36.4 million (FY2013: £36.4 million) in respect of its UK operations. The increase in capital losses arose from the liquidation of a number of dormant subsidiary companies. No deferred tax asset has been recognised in respect of these losses.
| 2014 £'m |
2013 £'m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Called up, allotted and fully paid | ||
| 207,134,266 (FY2013: 188,345,784) ordinary shares of 1 pence each | 2.1 | 1.9 |
The holders of the ordinary shares shall be entitled to one vote for each ordinary share.
During the year the Company issued 18,788,482 ordinary shares for total consideration of £31.8 million, which increased issued share capital by £0.2 million and share premium by £31.6 million.
The fair value of the options was assessed by an independent actuary using a Black-Scholes model based on the assumptions set out in the table below:
| Grant date 26 August 2014 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| (UK three years) |
(UK five years) |
||
| Number of options granted | 255,503 | 89,787 | |
| Share price at grant date | (pence) | 216 | 216 |
| Exercise price | (pence) | 164 | 164 |
| Risk-free rate of interest | (% per annum) | 1.10 | 1.75 |
| Expected volatility | (% per annum) | 30.8 | 33.1 |
| Expected dividend yield | (% per annum) | 2.24 | 2.24 |
| Expected term to exercise | (years) | 3.25 | 5.25 |
| Value per option | (pence) | 58 | 67 |
The fair values of the awards granted in the accounting period were assessed by an independent actuary using a Monte Carlo model based on the assumptions set out in the table below. In determining an appropriate assumption for expected future volatility, the historical volatility of the share price of Safestore Holdings plc has been considered along with the historical volatility of comparator companies.
| Grant date February 2014 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| (PBT-EPS part) | (TSR part) | ||
| Number of options granted | 451,831 | 225,915 | |
| Share price at grant date | (pence) | 195 | 195 |
| Exercise price | (pence) | — | — |
| Risk-free rate of interest | (% per annum) | n/a | 0.97 |
| Expected volatility | (% per annum) | — | 29.4 |
| Expected term to exercise | (years) | 3 | 3 |
| Value per option | (pence) | 195 | 142 |
During the year, 345,290 options were granted under the Sharesave scheme, 193,495 options were exercised and 55,471 options lapsed as shown in the table below. 677,746 awards were granted under the 2009 Performance Share Plan and 796,417 awards lapsed. No awards were exercised under the 2009 Performance Share Plan. At the end of the accounting period, options over 443,645 ordinary shares were outstanding under the Sharesave scheme and 2,110,182 awards in the Performance Share Plan remain unvested. Details of the awards outstanding under all of the Group's share schemes over the accounting years are set out below:
| At 31 October |
At 31 October |
Exercise | Expiry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of grant | 2013 | Granted | Exercised | Lapsed | 2014 | price | date |
| Safestore Holdings plc Sharesave scheme |
|||||||
| 11/08/2011 | 237,573 | — | (193,495) | (34,708) | 9,370 | 104.0p | 11/02/2015 |
| 11/08/2011 | 109,748 | — | — | (20,763) | 88,985 | 104.0p | 11/02/2017 |
| 26/08/2014 | — | 255,503 | — | — | 255,503 | 164.0p | 01/03/2018 |
| 26/08/2014 | — | 89,787 | — | — | 89,787 | 164.0p | 01/03/2020 |
| Total | 347,321 | 345,290 | (193,495) | (55,471) | 443,645 | ||
| Safestore 2009 Performance Share Plan |
|||||||
| 01/02/2011 | 509,481 | — | — | (509,481) | — | 0.0p | 01/02/2015 |
| 01/02/2012 | 671,000 | — | — | (25,435) | 645,565 | 0.0p | 01/02/2016 |
| 28/06/2012 | 99,510 | — | — | (44,227) | 55,283 | 0.0p | 29/06/2016 |
| 06/02/2013 | 654,935 | — | — | (106,395) | 548,540 | 0.0p | 06/02/2017 |
| 28/06/2013 | 293,927 | — | — | — | 293,927 | 0.0p | 28/06/2017 |
| 04/02/2014 | — | 677,746 | — | (110,879) | 566,867 | 0.0p | 04/02/2018 |
| Total | 2,228,853 | 677,746 | — | (796,417) | 2,110,182 |
No options have been modified since grant under any of the schemes.
Amounts previously reported for outstanding options in respect the 2011 Sharesave awards have been restated to reflect the appropriate amount of lapsed awards.
| Notes | Translation reserve £'m |
Hedge reserve £'m |
Retained earnings £'m |
Total £'m |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance at 1 November 2012 | (0.5) | (1.8) | 215.4 | 213.1 | |
| Profit for the year | — | — | 108.5 | 108.5 | |
| Dividends | 9 | — | — | (10.6) | (10.6) |
| Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations | 6.0 | — | — | 6.0 | |
| Recycling of hedge reserve | — | (0.5) | — | (0.5) | |
| Tax on items taken to other comprehensive income | — | (1.1) | — | (1.1) | |
| Employee share options | — | — | 0.2 | 0.2 | |
| Balance at 31 October 2013 | 5.5 | (3.4) | 313.5 | 315.6 | |
| Profit for the year | — | — | 46.8 | 46.8 | |
| Dividends | 9 | — | — | (12.5) | (12.5) |
| Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations | (8.4) | — | — | (8.4) | |
| Change in fair value of hedged instruments | — | (3.3) | — | (3.3) | |
| Recycling of hedge reserve | — | 6.7 | — | 6.7 | |
| Employee share options | — | — | 1.0 | 1.0 | |
| Balance at 31 October 2014 | (2.9) | — | 348.8 | 345.9 |
The translation reserve balance of £2.9 million adverse (FY2013: £5.5 million) comprises all foreign exchange differences arising from the translation of the financial statements of foreign operations. The hedge reserve balance of £nil (FY2013: £3.4 million adverse) comprises the unrealised elements of derivative financial instruments recognised in equity.
Included within retained earnings are ordinary shares with a nominal value of £1,428 (FY2013: £1,428) that represent shares allotted to the Safestore Employee Benefit Trust in satisfaction of awards under the Group's Long Term Incentive Plan in 2008 and which remain unvested.
Reconciliation of operating profit to net cash inflow from operating activities:
| 2014 | 2013 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash generated from continuing operations | Notes | £'m | £'m |
| Profit before income tax | 52.4 | 48.6 | |
| Gain on investment properties | 11 | (24.1) | (21.5) |
| Depreciation | 12 | 0.5 | 0.4 |
| Impairment of non-current assets | 12 | — | 0.5 |
| Change in fair value of derivatives | (1.2) | 1.3 | |
| Net finance expense | 4 | 23.2 | 20.6 |
| Employee share options | 1.0 | 0.2 | |
| Changes in working capital: | |||
| Increase in inventories | (0.1) | — | |
| Increase in trade and other receivables | (3.5) | (0.6) | |
| Increase in trade and other payables | 4.4 | 2.1 | |
| Cash generated from continuing operations | 52.6 | 51.6 |
| 2013 £'m |
Cash flows £'m |
Non-cash movements £'m |
2014 £'m |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash in hand | 15.8 | 0.5 | (1.0) | 15.3 |
| Debt due within one year | (5.0) | 5.0 | (5.0) | (5.0) |
| Debt due after one year | (337.9) | 70.3 | 8.0 | (259.6) |
| Total net debt excluding finance leases | (327.1) | 75.8 | 2.0 | (249.3) |
| Finance leases due within one year | (8.6) | 4.9 | (4.3) | (8.0) |
| Finance leases due after one year | (47.1) | — | 4.1 | (43.0) |
| Total finance leases | (55.7) | 4.9 | (0.2) | (51.0) |
| Total net debt | (382.8) | 80.7 | 1.8 | (300.3) |
Non-cash movements relate to reclassification of non-current debt to current debt, amortisation of debt issue costs, foreign exchange movements and unwinding of discount.
| Staff costs (including Directors) for the Group during the year | 2014 £'m |
2013 £'m |
|---|---|---|
| Wages and salaries | 14.2 | 14.3 |
| Social security costs | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| Other pension costs | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Share based payments | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| 17.9 | 17.2 |
During the period ended 31 October 2014 the Company's equity-settled share based payment arrangements comprised the Safestore Holdings plc Sharesave scheme and the Safestore 2009 Performance Share Plan. The number of awards made under each scheme are detailed in note 22. No options have been modified since grant under any of the schemes.
| Average monthly number of people (including Executive Directors) employed | 2014 Number |
2013 Number |
|---|---|---|
| Sales | 452 | 460 |
| Administration | 71 | 72 |
| 523 | 532 |
Previously reported amounts for sales employees have been restated to exclude employees of Space Maker, as the Directors believe this is a more appropriate measure of the Group's employees.
| Key management compensation | 2014 £'m |
2013 £'m |
|---|---|---|
| Wages and salaries | 2.2 | 3.2 |
| Social security costs | 0.8 | 0.5 |
| Post-employment benefits | 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Share based payments | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| 4.1 | 4.1 | |
| The key management figures given above include Directors. | ||
| 2014 | 2013 |
| Directors | £'m | £'m |
|---|---|---|
| Aggregate emoluments | 1.7 | 2.0 |
| Company contributions paid to money purchase pension schemes | — | 0.1 |
| 1.7 | 2.1 |
There were two Directors (FY2013: three) accruing benefits under a money purchase scheme.
As part of the Group banking facility, the Company has guaranteed the borrowings totalling £265.2 million (FY2013: £343.6 million) of fellow Group undertakings by way of a charge over all of its property and assets. There are similar cross guarantees provided by the Group companies in respect of any bank borrowings which the Company may draw under a Group facility agreement. The financial liability associated with this guarantee is considered remote and therefore no provision has been recorded.
The Group had £0.3 million capital commitments as at 31 October 2014 (FY2013: £nil).
The Group's shares are widely held.
During the year £nil (FY2013: £nil) transactions were carried out with related parties.
Safestore Holdings plc is a limited liability company incorporated in England and Wales and domiciled in the UK. It operates as the ultimate parent company of the Safestore Holdings plc Group.
as at 31 October 2014
| Company | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Notes | 2014 £'m |
2013 £'m |
|
| Fixed assets | |||
| Tangible fixed assets | 5 | — | — |
| Fixed asset investments | 6 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Total fixed assets | 1.0 | 1.0 | |
| Current assets | |||
| Debtors: amounts falling due within one year | 7 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Debtors: amounts falling due after more than one year | 7 | 160.0 | 129.3 |
| Cash at bank and in hand | 1.1 | 2.3 | |
| Total current assets | 161.3 | 131.8 | |
| Total assets | 162.3 | 132.8 | |
| Creditors: amounts falling due within one year | 8 | (7.2) | (5.9) |
| Total assets less current liabilities | 155.1 | 126.9 | |
| Creditors: amounts falling due after more than one year | 9 | (70.0) | (71.0) |
| Net assets | 85.1 | 55.9 | |
| Capital and reserves | |||
| Ordinary shares | 10 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Share premium account | 11 | 60.0 | 28.4 |
| Profit and loss account | 11 | 23.0 | 25.6 |
| Total shareholders' funds | 12 | 85.1 | 55.9 |
The Company financial statements on pages 92 to 95 were approved by the Board of Directors on 21 January 2015 and signed on its behalf by:
A Jones F Vecchioli Chief Financial Officer Chief Executive Officer
Company registration number: 4726380
for the year ended 31 October 2014
The financial statements are prepared in accordance with applicable accounting standards in the UK and the Companies Act 2006. The particular accounting policies adopted are described below. The financial statements are prepared on a going concern basis under the historical cost convention.
Although the Group consolidated accounts are prepared under IFRS, Safestore Holdings plc's financial statements presented in this section are prepared under UK GAAP.
There have been no new accounting standards adopted during the year.
Investments held as fixed assets are stated at cost less provision for impairment in value.
Fixtures and fittings are stated at historic purchase cost less accumulated depreciation. Costs are all directly attributable costs in bringing the asset into working condition for its intended use. Depreciation has been charged at the rate of 15% per annum on a straight line basis.
The Company has taken advantage of the exemption given in FRS 1 and has consequently not prepared a cash flow statement.
Share based incentives are provided to employees under the Company's bonus share plan, performance share plan and employee Sharesave schemes. The Company recognises a compensation cost in respect of these schemes that is based on the fair value of the awards, measured using Black-Scholes, Binomial and Monte Carlo valuation methodologies. For equity-settled schemes, the fair value is determined at the date of grant and is not subsequently re-measured unless the conditions on which the award was granted are modified. For cash-settled schemes, the fair value is determined at the date of grant and is re-measured at each balance sheet date until the liability is settled. Generally, the compensation cost is recognised on a straight line basis over the vesting period. Adjustments are made to reflect expected and actual forfeitures during the vesting period due to the failure to satisfy service conditions or non-market performance conditions. See note 22 in the Group accounts for further disclosures.
Interest income is recognised using the effective interest method. Dividend income is recognised when the right to receive payment is established.
The annual final dividend is not provided for until approved at the AGM whilst interim dividends are charged in the period they are paid.
As permitted by Section 408 of the Companies Act 2006, the profit and loss account of the parent company is not presented as part of these financial statements. The parent company's profit for the financial year amounted to £8.9 million (FY2013: £21.9 million).
The Directors' emoluments are disclosed in note 26 of the Annual Report and financial statements of the Group.
The Company does not have any employees (FY2013: none). Auditors' remuneration for the year ended 31 October 2014 was £10,000 (FY2013: £10,000). There were no non-audit services (FY2013: none) provided by the auditors.
| £'m | |
|---|---|
| Cost | |
| As at 1 November 2013 and at 31 October 2014 | 0.2 |
| Accumulated depreciation | |
| As at 1 November 2013 | 0.2 |
| Charge for the year | — |
| At 31 October 2014 | 0.2 |
| Net book value | |
| At 31 October 2014 | — |
| At 31 October 2013 | — |
| £'m | |
|---|---|
| Cost and net book value | |
| At 1 November 2013 and 31 October 2014 | 1.0 |
Investments in Group undertakings are stated at cost. The Directors consider that to give full particulars of all subsidiary undertakings would lead to a statement of excessive length. A list of principal subsidiary undertakings is given below. The Directors believe that the carrying value of the investments is supported by their underlying net assets.
The Company has the following wholly owned subsidiaries:
| Subsidiary | Country of incorporation | Principal activity |
|---|---|---|
| Safestore Group Limited | England and Wales | Holding company |
| Safestore Limited1 | England and Wales | Provision of self-storage |
| Spaces Personal Storage Limited1 | England and Wales | Holding company |
| Safestore Properties Limited2 | England and Wales | Holding company |
| Une Pièce en Plus SAS3 | France | Provision of self-storage |
| Compagnie de Libre Entreposage France SAS3 | France | Holding company |
1 Safestore Limited and Spaces Personal Storage Limited are both 100% subsidiaries of Safestore Acquisition Limited.
2 Safestore Properties Limited is a 100% subsidiary of Mentmore Limited.
3 Une Pièce en Plus SAS and Compagnie de Libre Entreposage France SAS are both 100% subsidiaries of Mentmore Limited.
| 2014 £'m |
2013 £'m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Trade debtors | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Other debtors | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Debtors due within one year | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Amounts owed by Group undertakings | 160.0 | 129.3 |
| Debtors due after more than one year | 160.0 | 129.3 |
| 2014 £'m |
2013 £'m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Trade creditors | 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Amounts owed to Group undertakings | 6.1 | 4.8 |
| Other taxes and social security | 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Accruals and deferred income | 0.9 | 0.7 |
| Creditors due within one year | 7.2 | 5.9 |
| 2014 £'m |
2013 £'m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Secured loan notes | 70.6 | 71.7 |
| Debt issue costs | (0.6) | (0.7) |
| 70.0 | 71.0 |
The loan notes are \$65.6 million (FY2013: \$67.0 million) 5.52% Series A senior Secured Notes due 2019 and \$47.3 million (FY2013: \$48.0 million) 6.29% Series B Senior Secured notes due 2024.
| 2014 £'m |
2013 £'m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Allotted and fully paid | ||
| 207,134,266 (FY2013: 188,345,784) ordinary shares of 1 pence | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| At 31 October | 2.1 | 1.9 |
The holders of the ordinary shares shall be entitled to one vote for each ordinary share.
For details of share options see note 22 in the Group financial statements.
| Dividends paid At 31 October 2014 |
— 60.0 |
(12.5) 23.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Employee share options | — | 1.0 |
| Issue of share capital | 31.6 | — |
| Profit for the year | — | 8.9 |
| At 1 November 2013 | 28.4 | 25.6 |
| Share premium account £'m |
Profit and loss reserve £'m |
For details of the dividend paid in the year see note 9 in the Group financial statements.
| 2014 £'m |
2013 £'m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Profit for the year | 8.9 | 21.9 |
| Dividends paid | (12.5) | (10.6) |
| Employee share options | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| Issue of share capital | 31.8 | 0.1 |
| At 1 November | 55.9 | 44.3 |
| At 31 October | 85.1 | 55.9 |
The Company has taken advantage of the exemption available under FRS 8 'Related Party Disclosures' and has not disclosed details of its transactions with certain related parties. This exemption is available as the transactions are with entities that are part of the same group and the consolidated accounts are publicly available.
For details of contingent liabilities see note 27 in the Group financial statements.
This document is important and requires your immediate attention. If you are in any doubt as to any aspect of the proposals referred to in this document or as to the action you should take, you should seek your own advice from a stockbroker, bank manager, solicitor, accountant or other independent professional adviser duly authorised under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.
If you have sold or otherwise transferred all of your ordinary shares in Safestore Holdings plc, please pass this document together with any accompanying documents to the purchaser or transferee, or to the person who arranged the sale or transfer so they can pass these documents to the purchaser or transferee who now holds the shares.
(the "Company")
(Incorporated in England and Wales under the Companies Act 1985 with registered number 04726380)
Notice of the Annual General Meeting of the Company to be held at the offices of the Company, Brittanic House, Stirling Way, Borehamwood Herts WD6 2BT on 19 March 2015 at 12.00 noon (the "Annual General Meeting") is set out on pages 97 to 102 of this document.
A Form of Proxy for use at the Annual General Meeting accompanies this document. Whether or not you propose to attend the Annual General Meeting, please complete and submit the Form of Proxy in accordance with the instructions printed on it. The Form of Proxy must be deposited at the offices of the Registrar of the Company, Capita Asset Services, PXS, The Registry, 34 Beckenham Road, Beckenham, Kent BR3 4TU.
Alternatively, you can appoint a proxy electronically at www.capitashareportal.com or, if you hold your shares in CREST, you may appoint a proxy via the CREST electronic proxy appointment service. Notice of your appointment of a proxy should reach Capita Asset Services by no later than 12.00 noon on 17 March 2015.
The results of the meeting will be announced as soon as practicable and will appear on the Company's website, www.safestore.com.
All times shown in this document are London times unless otherwise indicated.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING (the "Meeting" or "Annual General Meeting") of Safestore Holdings plc (the "Company") will be held at Brittanic House, Stirling Way, Borehamwood, Hertfordshire WD6 2BT on 19 March 2015 at 12.00 noon for the following purposes:
To consider, and if thought fit, pass the following resolutions, of which numbers 1 to 13 will be proposed as ordinary resolutions and numbers 14 to 16 will be proposed as special resolutions:
during the period beginning with the date of the passing of this resolution and ending at the conclusion of the Company's next Annual General Meeting after the date of the passing of this resolution provided that the maximum amounts referred to in (a), (b) and (c) may comprise sums in different currencies which shall be converted at such rate as the Board may in its absolute discretion determine to be appropriate.
and this power, unless renewed, shall expire at the end of the next Annual General Meeting of the Company after the passing of this resolution but shall extend to the making, before such expiry, of an offer or agreement which would or might require equity securities to be allotted after such expiry and the Directors may allot equity securities in pursuance of such offer or agreement as if the authority conferred hereby had not expired.
By order of the Board
Company Secretary
Registered office: Brittanic House Stirling Way Borehamwood Hertfordshire WD6 2BT
Dated: 16 February 2015
Notes to Notice
Completion of the proxy form or appointment of a proxy through CREST will not prevent a member from attending and voting in person.
You may submit your vote electronically at www.capitashareportal.com not later than 48 hours before the time fixed for the Meeting or adjourned meeting at which your proxy proposes to vote.
In accordance with best practice, the Audit Committee undertook a competitive tender process for the audit of the Company and its subsidiaries for the year ending 31 October 2014. Since the resignation of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Deloitte LLP has filled a casual vacancy in the office of auditor under Section 489 of the Companies Act 2006 (the "Act"). The Directors propose the appointment of Deloitte LLP at the Annual General Meeting (the "Meeting") until the conclusion of the next general meeting at which accounts are laid.
Adrian Martin will be retiring at the end of the Meeting and is, therefore, not standing for re-election. The UK Corporate Governance Code and the Company's Articles of Association require that a Director appointed during the preceding year should be subject to election at the Company's next Annual General Meeting. Accordingly, Joanne Kenrick is standing for election as a Director at the Meeting. In addition, under the Company's Articles of Association, one-third of the Directors (other than newly appointed Directors) are to retire from office and offer themselves for re-election. Further, notwithstanding the fact that the Company is not a FTSE 350 company, for this Annual General Meeting, for the sake of good corporate governance, it has been decided that the entire Board (and not just one-third of the Board) will be put up for re-election and therefore Alan Lewis, Keith Edelman, Frederic Vecchioli, Andy Jones and Ian Krieger will stand for re-election to the Board. Resolutions 6–11 (inclusive) propose their re-election and Joanne Kenrick's election as Directors. The election and re-election of Directors will take effect at the conclusion of the Meeting.
Resolution 12 seeks to renew the authority granted at last year's Annual General Meeting for the Company to make political donations to political parties, to other political organisations and to independent election candidates or to incur political expenditure.
It is not the policy of the Company or its subsidiaries to make political donations of this type and the Directors have no intention of changing that policy. However, as a result of the wide definitions in the Act of matters constituting political donations, normal expenditure (such as expenditure on organisations concerned with matters of public policy, law reform and representation of the business community) and business activities (such as communicating with the Government and political parties at local, national and European level) might be construed as political expenditure or as a donation to a political party or other political organisation and fall within the restrictions of the Act.
This resolution does not purport to authorise any particular donation or expenditure but is expressed in general terms as required by the Act and is intended to authorise normal donations and expenditure. If passed, resolution 12 would allow the Company and its subsidiaries:
(i) to make donations to political parties and/or independent election candidates up to an aggregate limit of £100,000;
(ii) to make donations to other political organisations up to an aggregate limit of £100,000; and
(iii) to incur political expenditure (as defined in the Act) up to an aggregate limit of £100,000,
during the period up to the conclusion of the next Annual General Meeting of the Company whilst avoiding inadvertent infringement of the statute. Any political donation made or political expenditure incurred which is in excess of £2,000 will be disclosed in the Company's Annual Report for next year, as required by the Act. The authority will not be used to make political donations within the normal meaning of that expression.
Resolution 12 replaces a similar authority put in place at the Annual General Meeting held on 19 March 2014. No payments were made under this authority.
The resolution asks shareholders to grant the Directors authority under Section 551 of the Act to allot shares or grant such subscription or conversion rights as are contemplated by Sections 551(1)(a) and (b) respectively of the Act up to a maximum aggregate nominal value of £1,380,894, being approximately two-thirds of the nominal value of the issued ordinary share capital of the Company as at 13 February 2015. As at 13 February 2015, the Company did not hold any treasury shares. £690,447 of this authority is reserved for a fully pre-emptive rights issue. This is the maximum permitted amount under best practice corporate governance guidelines. The Directors consider it important to have the maximum ability and flexibility commensurate with good corporate governance guidelines to raise finance to enable the Company to respond to market developments and conditions. The Directors have no present intention of exercising such authority. The authority will expire at the next Annual General Meeting. The resolution replaces a similar resolution passed at the Annual General Meeting of the Company held on 19 March 2014.
If the Directors wish to allot new shares or other equity securities for cash, the Act requires that such shares or other equity securities are offered first to existing shareholders in proportion to their existing holding. The allotment of equity securities as referred to in this resolution includes the sale of any shares which the Company holds in treasury following a purchase of its own shares. Resolution 14 asks shareholders to grant the Directors authority to allot equity securities for cash up to an aggregate nominal value of £103,567 (being 5% of the Company's issued ordinary share capital as at 13 February 2015) without first offering the securities to existing shareholders. The Directors confirm that equity securities in excess of 7.5% of the Company's issued ordinary share capital will not be issued for cash on a non pre-emptive basis over a rolling three year period without suitable advance consultation with shareholders. The resolution also disapplies the statutory pre-emption provisions in connection with a rights issue and allows the Directors, in the case of a rights issue, to make appropriate arrangements in relation to treasury shares, fractional entitlements or other legal or practical problems which might arise. The authority will expire at the next Annual General Meeting. The resolution replaces a similar resolution passed at the Annual General Meeting of the Company held on 19 March 2014.
Resolution 15 to be proposed at the Annual General Meeting seeks authority from shareholders for the Company to make market purchases of its own ordinary shares of 1 pence each ("Ordinary Shares"), such authority being limited to the purchase of 10% of the Ordinary Shares in issue as at 13 February 2015. The maximum price payable for the purchase by the Company of its own Ordinary Shares will be limited to the higher of 5% above the average of the middle market quotations of the Company's Ordinary Shares, as derived from The Daily Official List of the London Stock Exchange, for the five business days prior to the purchase and the higher of the price of the last independent trade of an ordinary share and the highest current independent bid for an ordinary share as derived from the London Stock Exchange Trading System. The minimum price payable by the Company for the purchase of its own Ordinary Shares will be 1 pence per Ordinary Share (being the amount equal to the nominal value of an Ordinary Share). The authority to purchase the Company's own Ordinary Shares will only be exercised if the Directors consider that there is likely to be a beneficial impact on earnings per Ordinary Share and that it is in the best interests of the Company at the time. The resolution renews a similar resolution passed at the Annual General Meeting of the Company held on 19 March 2014. The Company will be able to hold the Ordinary Shares which have been repurchased as treasury shares and re-sell them for cash, cancel them or use them in connection with certain of its share schemes.
Options to subscribe for up to 3,079,372 Ordinary Shares have been granted and are outstanding as at 13 February 2015 (being the latest practicable date prior to publication of this document) representing 1.49% of the issued ordinary share capital at that date (excluding shares held in treasury). If the Directors were to exercise in full the power for which they are seeking authority under resolution 15, the options outstanding as at 13 February 2015 would represent 1.65% of the ordinary share capital (excluding shares held in treasury) in issue following such exercise.
Resolution 16 to be proposed at the Meeting seeks authority from shareholders to hold general meetings (other than Annual General Meetings) on 14 days' clear notice. This is permissible under the existing articles of association of the Company and the Act. However, pursuant to the EU Shareholders' Rights Directive, the Company must offer the facility, accessible to all shareholders, to vote by electronic means and must obtain specific shareholder approval annually in order to retain this ability. The Directors believe that there may be circumstances in which it will be important for the Company to be able to call meetings at such short notice. The shorter notice would not be used as a matter of course, but only where it is merited by the business of the meeting and is thought to be to the advantage of shareholders as a whole. Accordingly, the Directors believe that it is important for the Company to retain this flexibility.
The Board of Directors considers that each of the resolutions being proposed at the Annual General Meeting are in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders as a whole. Accordingly, the Directors unanimously recommend that shareholders vote in favour of the resolutions as they intend to do in respect of their own beneficial shareholdings.
For the 2015 Annual General Meeting to be held at 12.00 noon on Thursday 19 March 2015
I/We the undersigned, being a holder of ordinary shares of 1 pence each of the capital of Safestore Holdings plc (the "Company"), hereby appoint the duly appointed Chairman of the meeting (see note 1 below) or
to act as my/our proxy at the Annual General Meeting of the Company to be held at 12.00 noon on 19 March 2015 at Brittanic House, Stirling Way, Borehamwood, Hertfordshire WD6 2BT and at any adjournment thereof and to vote on my/our behalf as directed below.
Please tick here if this proxy appointment is one of multiple appointments being made.
Please indicate with an "X" in the spaces provided how you wish your votes to be cast on a poll. Should this card be returned duly signed, but without specific direction, the proxy will vote or abstain at his/her discretion.
| Ordinary resolutions | For | Against | Vote withheld |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. To receive and adopt the Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 October 2014 |
|||
| 2. To approve the Directors' remuneration report for the year ended 31 October 2014 |
|||
| 3. To appoint Deloitte LLP as auditors |
|||
| 4. To authorise the Directors to determine the auditors' remuneration |
|||
| 5. To declare a final dividend of 5.30 pence per ordinary share for the year ended 31 October 2014 |
|||
| 6. To re-elect Alan Lewis as a Director of the Company |
|||
| 7. To re-elect Keith Edelman as a Director of the Company |
|||
| 8. To re-elect Frederic Vecchioli as a Director of the Company |
|||
| 9. To re-elect Andy Jones as a Director of the Company |
|||
| 10. To re-elect Ian Krieger as a Director of the Company | |||
| 11. To elect Joanne Kenrick as a Director of the Company | |||
| 12. To authorise political donations and political expenditure | |||
| 13. To authorise the Directors to allot shares subject to the restrictions set out in the resolution | |||
| Special resolutions | |||
| 14. To authorise the disapplication of pre-emption rights subject to the limits set out in the resolution | |||
| 15. To authorise market purchases of ordinary shares up to a specified amount | |||
| 16. To reduce the notice period for general meetings other than an Annual General Meeting |
Unless otherwise instructed, the proxy may vote as he/she thinks fit or abstain from voting in respect of the resolutions specified and also on any other business (including amendments to resolutions) that may properly come before the meeting.
| Signature | Dated |
|---|---|
| Full name of registered holder(s) | |
| Address | |
| Postcode |
Please return this proxy form to Capita Asset Services, PXS, 34 Beckenham Road, Beckenham, Kent BR3 4TU so as to arrive by 12.00 noon on 17 March 2015.
As an alternative to completing your hard-copy proxy form, you can appoint a proxy electronically at www.capitashareportal.com.
For an electronic proxy appointment to be valid, your appointment must be received by no later than 12.00 noon on 17 March 2015. You will be asked to enter the investor code shown on your share certificate or dividend tax voucher and agree to certain terms and conditions.
If you hold your shares in uncertificated form, you may appoint a proxy using the CREST electronic proxy appointment service, details of which are set out in notes vi, vii and viii to the Notice of Annual General Meeting.
A member of the Company may appoint more than one proxy, provided that each proxy is appointed to exercise the rights attached to different shares. When two or more valid but differing appointments of proxy are delivered or received for the same share for use at the same meeting, the one which is last validly delivered or received (regardless of its date or the date of its execution) shall be treated as replacing and revoking the other or others as regards that share. If the Company is unable to determine which appointment was last validly delivered or received, none of them shall be treated as valid in respect of that share. To appoint more than one proxy, you should contact Capita Asset Services at the address stated in the information included with this proxy form.
A S Lewis (Non-Executive Chairman) F Vecchioli (Chief Executive Officer) A B Jones (Chief Financial Officer) A H Martin (Non-Executive Director) K G Edelman (Non-Executive Director) I S Krieger (Non-Executive Director) J L Kenrick (Non-Executive Director)
S Ahmed
Brittanic House Stirling Way Borehamwood Hertfordshire WD6 2BT
4726380
www.safestore.co.uk www.safestore.com
National Westminster Bank HSBC Bank Lloyds Bank Abbey National Treasury Services BRED Banque Populaire Bank of Taiwan Chang Hwa Commercial Bank
Deloitte LLP Chartered Accountants and Statutory Auditors 2 New Street Square EC4A 3BZ
Travers Smith LLP 10 Snow Hill London EC1A 2AL
Eversheds LLP 115 Colmore Row Birmingham B3 3AL
Investec Bank Plc 2 Gresham Street London EC2V 7QP
Citigroup Global Markets Limited Citigroup Centre 33 Canada Square London E14 5LB
Instinctif Partners 65 Gresham Street London EC2V 7NQ
Capita Asset Services Northern House Woodsome Park Fenay Bridge Huddersfield HD8 0GA
Telephone (in UK): 0871 664 0300 (Calls cost 10 pence per minute plus network extras)
Telephone (from overseas): +44 (0)20 8639 3399
Fax: +44 (0)1484 600 911 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.capitashareportal.com Share Portal: www.capitashareportal.com
Through the website of our Registrar, Capita Asset Services, shareholders are able to manage their shareholding by registering for the Share Portal, a free, secure, online access to their shareholding.
All the latest news and updates for investors at www.safestore.com.
This Annual Report has been printed on Evolution Digital Satin, a recycled paper stock containing 75% recycled waste and 25% virgin fibre. This report was printed by Rapidity Communications using their environmental print technology which minimises the impact of printing on the environment. Rapidity holds the Carbon Smart Gold Award.
Safestore Holdings plc Brittanic House Stirling Way Borehamwood Hertfordshire WD6 2BT Tel: 020 8732 1500 Fax: 020 8732 1510 www.safestore.co.uk www.safestore.com
Building tools?
Free accounts include 100 API calls/year for testing.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.