Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

S2 RESOURCES LTD Regulatory Filings 2016

Dec 18, 2016

65745_rns_2016-12-18_2f684d58-f5dc-4c89-a259-c43c2f241f80.pdf

Regulatory Filings

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

ASX Announcement

Monday 19[th] December 2016

==> picture [594 x 105] intentionally omitted <==

EXPLORATION UPDATE – SKELLEFTE

Key points

  • Verification of historical drilling at Bjurtraskgruvan confirms VMS mineralization extends from outcrop down plunge to the southwest to a vertical depth of 120 metres

  • Mineralization is open down plunge from this drilling

  • Ground EM at Bjurtraskgruvan identifies 150 metre strike length conductor consistent with this and plunging to the southwest

  • First follow up hole at Svan Vit intersects stringer sphalerite mineralization

  • Drilling of two other EM targets (Svansele 403-2 and Udden 401-13) intersects pyrrhotite and minor shale horizon

S2 Resources Ltd (“S2” or the “Company”) advises that exploration at the Company’s 100% owned Skellefte project in Sweden is progressing. At the Bjurtraskgruvan prospect, verification of historical drilling has outlined a south dipping lens of massive sulphide, and ground EM has identified a strong south dipping conductor associated with this zone. At the Svan Vit prospect, the first follow up hole has intersected stringer sphalerite mineralization. Drilling of two other VTEM targets (Svansele 403-2 and Udden 401-13) has also been completed.

Bjurtraskgruvan prospect

The Bjurtraskgruvan prospect was recently identified as one of 43 new anomalies (“Vargfors 401-4”) in S2’s new VTEM survey, and was confirmed with the identification of a mineralized outcrop with some historical drilling (see ASX announcement of 23 November 2016).

Subsequent compilation and verification of this historical drilling has outlined two south dipping lenses of zinc and copper bearing massive sulphide mineralization, extending down plunge from the outcrop to a vertical depth of 120 metres and remaining open down plunge beneath this (see Figures 1 and 2).

North Wing, Level 2, 1 Manning Street, Scarborough WA 6019, Australia PO Box 1059 Scarborough WA 6922, Australia ABN 18 606 128 090 T +61 8 6166 0240 F 61 8 6241 4299 E [email protected] W www.s2resources.com.au

Key historical intercepts (interpreted to approximate true width) from this mineralized zone include:

  • 3.8m @ 5.9% zinc, 0.6% copper, 8g/t silver from 86m in hole BJG80009

  • 6.2m @ 3.9% zinc, 0.4% copper, 3g/t silver from 97.4m in hole BJG80007

  • 6.1m @ 3.6% zinc, 0.2% copper, 4g/t silver from 30.5m in hole BJG80001

  • 4.1m @ 2.0% zinc, 1.3% copper, 12g/t silver from 97.4m in hole BJG80008

A new ground-based moving loop EM (MLEM) survey undertaken to confirm the VTEM target at the Bjurtraskgruvan prospect has identified a strong 150 metre strike length conductor which plunges gently to the southwest in a position consistent with the known mineralization (see Figures 1 and 2).

Many of the known VMS deposits of the Skellefte belt form plunging lenses and pipes which have relatively modest strike lengths but which extend from near surface to depths of 1,500 metres. The Company plans to test the down plunge potential of the Bjurtraskgruvan VMS deposit with follow up drilling early in the new year.

==> picture [442 x 359] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1. Isometric view of the known extent of the Bjurtraskgruvan VMS deposit, showing historical drilling, the new MLEM conductor, and the mineralized outcrop.

==> picture [459 x 595] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2. Plan projection view of the known extent of the Bjurtraskgruvan VMS deposit, showing historical drilling, the new MLEM conductor, and the mineralized outcrop.

Svan Vit prospect

==> picture [286 x 139] intentionally omitted <==

The first follow up drillhole (SSVT170004) at the Svan Vit prospect has been completed, intersecting several narrow zones of stringer sphalerite mineralization at the expected horizon between 217.5 metres and 220.1 metres downhole (see Figure 3). Assay results will not be available until early in 2017. The sphalerite stringers intersected in this hole are not sufficient to explain the DHEM conductor, so further DHEM is being undertaken to define the location and nature of the DHEM anomaly before additional follow up drilling (see Figure 4).

==> picture [459 x 323] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 3. Photograph of stringer sphalerite zones intersected in hole SSVT170004 at the Svan Vit prospect.

Other targets

The Svansele 403-2 and Udden 401-13 VTEM targets have been tested (see Figure 4 for the Svansele 403-2 drillhole). Hole SSVA170004 at the Svansele 403-2 VTEM target intersected a narrow zone of black shale with accompanying pyrrhotite where predicted by the EM at a depth of 135 metres, and hole SUDD170001 at the Udden 401-13 VTEM target intersected a pyrrhotite breccia zone where predicted by the EM at a depth of 133 metres.

The Svansele 403-2 and Udden 401-13 anomalies are two of over 100 anomalies identified in S2’s two VTEM surveys. An initial ten anomalies that have been ground-proofed by MLEM and BOT sampling are scheduled for drilling between now and April 2017.

==> picture [464 x 600] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 4. Plan view of drilling and EM conductors at the Svansele 403-2, 403-3 targets and the Svan Vit prospect.

For further information, please contact:

Mark Bennett Managing Director +61 8 6166 0240

==> picture [286 x 139] intentionally omitted <==

Anna Neuling Executive Director/Company Secretary +61 8 6166 0240

Competent Persons statement

The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Andy Thompson who is an employee of the company. Mr Thompson is a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Thompson has sufficient experience of relevance to the style of mineralization and the types of deposits under consideration, and to the activities undertaken, to qualify as Competent Persons as defined in the 2012 Edition of the Joint Ore Reserves Committee (JORC) Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves. Mr Thompson consents to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on information in the form and context in which it appears.

Annexure 1

The following Table is provided to ensure compliance with the JORC code (2012) edition requirements for the reporting of exploration results. Co-ordinates in this table are given in the Swedish National Grid SWEREF 99TM.

Bjurtraskgruvan prospect (historical drilling – see JORC tables)

Hole No. Total
Depth
North East RL Dip Azim From,
m
To,
m
Width,
m
Zn% Cu% Ag
g/t
BJG80001 109.3 7215982 722709 236 -60 352 30.5 36.6 6.1 3.60 0.20 4
BJG80002 69.7 7215981 722669 237 -60 000 33.7 38.7 5.0 2.30 0.10 6
BJG80003 85.6 7215977 722632 232 -60 002 NSI
BJG80004 59.6 7215979 722747 235 -60 005 29.5 36.2 6.7 1.10 0.70 8
BJG80005 138.8 7215908 722746 230 -60 010 NSI
BJG80006 68.5 7215980 722787 232 -60 008 NSI
BJG80007 134.8 7215908 722706 233 -60 006 97.4 103.6 6.2 3.90 0.40 3
BJG80008 125 7215906 722665 235 -60 010 97.4 101.5 4.1 2.00 1.30 12
BJG80009 126.3 7215907 722625 235 -60 015 27.9 30.6 2.7 2.10 0.00 3
and 86.0 89.8 3.8 5.90 0.60 8
BJG80010 165.2 7215849 722623 231 -60 005 142.1 143.7 1.6 0.60 0.80 5
BJG80011 166.8 7215846 722664 233 -60 002 147.2 152.8 5.6 1.30 0.90 6
Svan Vitprospect Svan Vitprospect
Hole No. Total
Depth
North East RL Dip Azim From,
m
To, m Width,
m
Zn% Cu% Ag
g/t
Au
g/t
SSVA160001 127.05 7215642 724691 429 60 035 25.30 25.85 0.55 <0.1 <0.1 45.0 1.49
and 88.70 89.05 1.05 2.87 <0.1 5.0 0.03
SSVA160002 258.70 7215560 724634 429 60 035 164.40 164.95 0.55 2.23 <0.1 <1 0.02
and 170.20 173.90 3.70 1.75 <0.1 5.3 0.01
and 184.60 189.65 5.05 3.15 0.2 6.0 0.04
including 186.40 187.35 0.95 4.55 0.29 4.0 0.09
and 188.40 189.65 1.25 5.07 0.16 5.0 0.04
and 207.55 214.05 6.50 <0.1 0.25 3.0 0.04
including 207.55 209.00 1.45 <0.1 0.43 7.0 0.10
SSVA160003 298.00 7215519 724604 430 65 035 NSI NSI NSI NSI
SSVT170004 263 7215533 724675 223 -60 35 Assays awaited – minor sphalerite stringers from 217.5-220.1m

Svansele 403-2 target

Hole No. Total
Depth
North East RL Dip Azim From,
m
To, m Width,
m
Zn% Cu% Ag
g/t
Au
g/t
SSVA170004 213.2 7215150 725074 199 -70 35 Assays awaited. Sulphidic, graphitic sediment at 134.9 – 144.7m

Svansele 403-3 target

Hole No. Total
Depth
North East RL Dip Azim From,
m
To, m Width,
m
Zn% Cu% Ag
g/t
Au
g/t
SSVA170001 341 7215478 725905 199 -70 35 Assays awaited – minor visual sulphide 180.9-184.45m & 268.5-
273.0m
SSVA170002 167 7215240 725746 210 -70 35 No visual intersection
SSVA170003 251 7215460 725947 199 -81 35 Assays awaited – minor visual sulphide 196.4-198.8m
Udden 401-13 target
Hole No. Total
Depth
North East RL Dip Azim From,
m
To, m Width,
m
Zn% Cu% Ag
g/t
Au
g/t
SUDD170001 140 7215478 727585 199 -60 35 Assays awaited – pyrrhotite breccia in sediments 133 – 133.9m

The following Tables are provided to ensure compliance with the JORC code (2012) edition requirements for the reporting of exploration results.

SECTION 1 SAMPLING TECHNIQUES AND DATA

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Sampling techniques Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels,
random chips, or specific specialised industry
standard measurement tools appropriate to the
minerals under investigation, such as down hole
gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc).
These examples should not be taken as limiting the
broad meaning of sampling.
The EM geophysical targets at Svansele 403 and Udden 401
were tested by diamond drilling. Drilling is undertaken by Oy
Kati AB of Kalajoki Finland drilling NQ2 rod size with a DDH size
of 75.7mm and core size of 50.7mm. NQ2 core samples are
logged and marked up by S2 personnel. Unbiased core sample
intervals were cut in half by diamond saw with half core sent
for analysis at ALS Laboratories.
All rock grab and rock float samples are collected from outcrop
by S2 personnel and marked into sample books and a
representative portion of the sample retained. All are
forwarded for analyses by ALS Laboratories.
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Include reference to measures taken to ensure
sample representivity and the appropriate
calibration of any measurement tools or systems
used
Sampling and QAQC procedures are carried out using S2
protocols as per industry best practice.
Aspects of the determination of mineralisation
that are Material to the Public Report. In cases
where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this
would be relatively simple (e.g. ‘reverse circulation
drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from
which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g
charge for fire assay’). In other cases more
explanation may be required, such as where there
is coarse gold that has inherent sampling
problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation
types (e.g. submarine nodules) may warrant
disclosure of detailed information
Diamond drilling was used to obtain core samples that have
been cut and sampled on intervals that are determined by
lithology and mineralisation.
The drill core samples are sent to ALS Laboratories for analyses
for gold and base metals. Drill core is sampled at S2’s facilities
in Mala, Sweden.
Drilling techniques Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open-hole
hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic,
etc) and details (e.g. core diameter, triple or
standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-
sampling bit or other type, whether core is
oriented and if so, by what method, etc).
Diamond drilling with NQ2 wireline bit producing a 50.7mm
diameter core.
Drill sample
recovery
Method of recording and assessing core and chip
sample recoveries and results assessed
Diamond Drill core recoveries are visually estimated
qualitatively on a metre basis and are recorded in the database.
Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and
ensure representative nature of the samples
Sample quality is qualitatively logged on a metre basis,
recording sample condition.
Whether a relationship exists between sample
recovery and grade and whether sample bias may
have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of
fine/coarse material.
No relationship has been seen to exist
Logging Whether core and chip samples have been
geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of
detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource
estimation, mining studies and metallurgical
studies.
The logging uses a standard legend developed by S2 which is
suitable for wireframing. Exploration holes are not
geotechnically logged but resource holes are.
Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in
nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc)
photography.
All core has been photographed both dry and wet. Geological
logging of the diamond drill holes is onto physical log sheets
followed by importing into S2’s central database
The total length and percentage of the relevant
intersections logged
All drill holes were logged in full.
Sub-sampling
techniques and
sample preparation
If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter,
half or all core taken.
Core sawn in half and half core taken.
If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary
split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry.
All samples are core.
For all sample types, the nature, quality and
appropriateness of the sample preparation
technique.
Samples were delivered by S2 personnel to ALS Minerals
laboratory in Mala, Sweden. All samples were forwarded to ALS
Minerals Ojebyn, Sweden Laboratory where they are to be
crushed with >70% <2mm (code CRU-31), split by riffle splitter
(code SPL-21), and pulverised 1000grm to 85% <75 um (code
PUL-32). Crushers and pulverizers are washed with QAQC tests
undertaken (codes CRU-QC, PUL-QC). The prepared samples are
forwarded to ALS Minerals Loughrea, Ireland, for analysis.
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-
sampling stages to maximise representivity of
samples.
Full QAQC system in place to determine accuracy and precision
of assays
Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is
representative of the in situ material collected,
including for instance results for field
duplicate/second-half sampling.
For DDH’s non biased core cutting through using an orientation
line marked on core and cut to the line
Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain
size of the material being sampled.
Samples of appropriate size
Quality of assay data
and laboratory tests
The nature, quality and appropriateness of the
assaying and laboratory procedures used and
whether the technique is considered partial or
total.
All samples were analysed by ALS Minerals Loughrea, Ireland.
Samples analysed for gold undergo a 50g fire assay with AA finish
(code Au-AA26). Samples analysed for Ag, As, Bi, Ca, Cd, Cu, Fe,
Hg, Mg, Mn, Mo, Ni, P, Pb, S, Sb, Tl & Zn undergo an oxidising
digestion with ICP-AES Finish (code ME-ICPORE).
For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld
XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in
determining the analysis including instrument
make and model, reading times, calibrations
factors applied and their derivation, etc.
No geophysical tools were used to determine any element
concentrations.
Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g.
standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory
checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy
(i.e. lack of bias) and precision have been
established.
Full QAQC system in place including Certified Standards and
blanks of appropriate matrix and levels
Verification of
sampling and
assaying
The verification of significant intersections by
either independent or alternative company
personnel.
James Coppard has personally inspected all drill cores and rock
samples.
The use of twinned holes. No twin holes have been drilled on the project to date.
Documentation of primary data, data entry
procedures, data verification, data storage
(physical and electronic) protocols.
Primary sampling data was collected in S2 sample books using
project prefix SSVA and unique numbers. The data is then
transferred to a set of standard Excel templates. The information
is managed by S2’s database manager for validation and
compilation into S2’s central database.
Discuss any adjustment to assay data. No adjustments made
Location of data
points
Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate
drillholes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches,
mine workings and other locations used in Mineral
Resource estimation.
Drill hole collars were located with a differential GPS with an
accuracy of within 1 metre.
Specification of the grid system used. The grid system used is the Standard Swedish National Grid –
SWEREF 99 TM unless otherwise stated.
Quality and adequacy of topographic control. Excellent quality topographic maps produced by the Swedish
Authorities - Landmateriat
Data spacing and
distribution
Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. Drill holes are exploratory at this stage and drilled to test
geochemical and geophysical target. No set spacing of drillholes
at this stage.
Whether the data spacing and distribution is
sufficient to establish the degree of geological and
grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral
Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s)
and classifications applied.
Data spacing and distribution is not sufficient at this stage to
allow the estimation of mineral resources.
Whether sample compositing has been applied. No sample compositing has been applied
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Orientation of data
in relation to
geological structure
Whether the orientation of sampling achieves
unbiased sampling of possible structures and the
extent to which this is known, considering the
deposit type.
Drillhole orientation is designed to test geophysical targets and
is not necessarily drilled perpendicular to the orientation of the
intersected mineralisation.
If the relationship between the drilling orientation
and the orientation of key mineralised structures is
considered to have introduced a sampling bias,
this should be assessed and reported if material.
The drilling at this stage is preliminary and exploratory. It is not
possible to assess if any sample bias has occurred due to hole
orientation at this stage.
Sample security The measures taken to ensure sample security. Chain of custody is managed by S2 personnel. Drill core is
visually checked at the drill rig and then transported to S2’s
logging and cutting facilities by S2 personnel for logging, cutting
and sampling. Bagged samples are transferred to ALS
Laboratories in Malå, Sweden by S2 personnel.
Audits or reviews The results of any audits or reviews of sampling
techniques and data.
No audits or reviews have been conducted at this stage.

SECTION 2 REPORTING OF EXPLORATION RESULTS

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Mineral tenement
and land tenure
status
Type, reference name/number, location and
ownership including agreements or material issues
with third parties such as joint ventures,
partnerships, overriding royalties, native title
interests, historical sites, wilderness or national
park and environmental settings.
The Svan Vit prospect, and the Svansele 403-2 and 403-3 VTEM
targets are located within the Svansele 403 Exploration Licence.
The Bjurtraskgruvan prospect is located within the Vargfors 401
Exploration Licence. The Udden 401-13 VTEM target is located
within the Udden 401 Exploration Licence. All of the above
exploration licences are 100% owned by S2 Sverige AB, a
Swedish registered 100% owned subsidiary of S2
The security of the tenure held at the time of
reporting along with any known impediments to
obtaining a licence to operate in the area.
All of the Exploration Licences are in good standing and no
known impediments exist on the tenements being actively
explored.
Exploration done by
other parties
Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by
other parties.
North of VTEM anomaly Svansele 403-1 (now termed the Svan
Vit prospect) there is a historical prospect known as
Snattermyran, discovered by boulder sampling in 1902.
During 1903-1905 trenching occurred. In 1926, 3 DDH’s were
drilled for a total of 152.17m with a best result of
[email protected]% Zn, 32g/t Ag. In 1980, the Swedish Geological
Survey (SGU) drilled 4 DDH’s for a total of 375.00m with a best
result of [email protected]% Zn, 20 g/t Ag in DDH80004. All holes
were drilled with an approximate azimuth of 345°-030°.
The Bjurtraskgruvan prospect was drilled, trenched and
mapped in 1944 and 1979-80. Drilling was undertaken by the
Swedish Geological Survey (SGU) for a total of 481m in 1944
and 1250m in 1979-80. The 1944 data was largely twinned by
the later drilling and also more comprehensively sampled.
The historical geological mapping has been georeferenced in
relation to the drillhole collars and also correlates well with the
modelled moving loop ground TEM plate. Drillhole collars have
been located and surveyed by S2 personnel. All available public
domain historic reports and logs at the SGU in Mala have been
reviewed and collated.
Geology Deposit type, geological setting and style of
mineralisation.
The area occupies the central portion of the Skellefte Belt, a
productive base and precious metal mining district dominated
by bimodal volcanics, primarily felsic in composition.
The mineralisation style is structurally remobilised volcanogenic
massive sulphide style mineralisation within greenschist grade
metamorphic rocks.
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Drill hole
Information
A summary of all information material to the
understanding of the exploration results including
a tabulation of the following information for all
Material drill holes:

easting and northing of the drill hole
collar

elevation or RL (Reduced Level –
elevation above sea level in metres) of
the drill hole collar

dip and azimuth of the hole

down hole length and interception
depth

hole length.
Refer to Annexure 1 above
Data aggregation
methods
In reporting Exploration Results, weighting
averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum
grade truncations (e.g. cutting of high grades) and
cut-off grades are usually Material and should be
stated.
All reported intersections of drilling undertaken by S2 have been
length weighted but not density weighted.
A nominal 1% Zn lower cut-off is used for diamond drill
intersections
(unless
otherwise
stated
in
polymetallic
intersections).
Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short
lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of
low grade results, the procedure used for such
aggregation should be stated and some typical
examples of such aggregations should be shown in
detail.
High grade intervals internal to broader zones of mineralisation
are reported as included intervals.
The assumptions used for any reporting of metal
equivalent values should be clearly stated.
None used.
Relationship
between
mineralisation
widths and intercept
lengths
These relationships are particularly important in
the reporting of Exploration Results.
If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect
to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should
be reported.
If it is not known and only the down hole lengths
are reported, there should be a clear statement to
this effect (e.g. ‘down hole length, true width not
known’).
The trend of mineralisation at the targets/prospects described is
not known at present but core angles indicate that
mineralisation is approximately true width.
Refer to Annexure 1 and Figures in body of text.
Diagram Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and
tabulations of intercepts should be included for
any significant discovery being reported These
should include, but not be limited to a plan view of
drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional
views.
Refer to Figures in body of text.
Balanced reporting Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration
Results is not practicable, representative reporting
of both low and high grades and/or widths should
be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of
Exploration Results.
Mineralisation is determined visually then sampled with results
awaited
Other substantive
exploration data
Other exploration data, if meaningful and
material, should be reported including (but not
limited to): geological observations; geophysical
survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk
samples – size and method of treatment;
metallurgical test results; bulk density,
groundwater, geotechnical and rock
characteristics; potential deleterious or
contaminating substances.
The area has numerous VTEM anomalies generated from a 2015
VTEM survey. Most anomalies being drilled have been ground
checked using moving loop EM to confirm anomalism and
enable modelling of specific drill targets. Base of till sampling is
also undertaken for interface geochemical information. At the
Bjurtraskgruvan prospect, rock chips have been taken from
outcropping gossans. Historic data from the SGU has been
compiled and modelled in 3D. Moving loop EM has confirmed
the VTEM anomaly as shown in the body of the text.
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Further work The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g.
tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or
large-scale step-out drilling).
Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible
extensions, including the main geological
interpretations and future drilling areas, provided
this information is not commercially sensitive
Further ground EM will be conducted at Bjurtraskgruvan to
determine the extent of the conductor down plunge. Diamond
drilling is planned at Bjurtraskgruvan in early 2017 to test down
plunge extensions. Downhole EM will be used as required to
further refine plate models and target drilling.