Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

S2 RESOURCES LTD Capital/Financing Update 2024

Feb 14, 2024

65745_rns_2024-02-14_f62a7349-b694-4ce3-aed1-fd807431e7d9.pdf

Capital/Financing Update

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

ASX Announcement

GREATER FOSTERVILLE EXPLORATION UPDATE

Key Points

15 February 2024

  • Further assay results received from initial diamond drillholes at Goornong prospect with high grade gold in SFVD0005
  • Drilling down the axial plane of the anticline has successfully identified multiple mineralised structural positions that will provide the basis for developing a detailed 3D structural model to use for future vectoring
  • Drilling is continuing at Goornong with SFVD0006 and SFVD0004, either side of SFVD0005, in progress.
  • Numerous intercepts in SFVD0005, including:
    • o 5.0 metres at 3.5g/t gold
    • o 3.0 metres at 9.2g/t gold
    • o 10.2 metres at 4.2g/t gold

S2 Resources Ltd ("S2" or the "Company") advises that its wholly owned subsidiary, Southern Star Exploration Pty Ltd ("Southern Star"), has received the second batch of assay results from the remainder of the third hole and the entirety of the fifth hole drilled immediately before and after the Christmas break at the Goornong prospect, at its 100% owned Greater Fosterville project.

These holes are part of the Company's first drilling program to test a favourable gold corridor centred on the Goornong prospect which is located immediately north of Agnico Eagle's Fosterville mine lease (see Figure 1). The primary aim of this program is to define the three-dimensional architecture of folding and faulting as an initial step in vectoring into potentially favourable positions for gold mineralisation. The results so far have confirmed the geological model, identified several potentially favourable offsetting structures, and as a bonus in SFVD0005, identified several zones of high grade gold mineralisation associated with quartz veining, sulphide (arsenopyrite and stibnite) alteration, and intrusive dykes.

Hole SFVD0005 is one of four drill holes planned to test for multiple structures that cross what is considered the favourable anticlinal fold axis to the south of the known near surface oxide mineralisation at Goornong. It is located approximately 800 metres south of the nearest hole, SFVD0003, which intersected a number of zones of modest gold mineralisation (see S2 ASX

Announcement of 28th December 2023 and Figure 2), including 15.8 metres at 1.6g/t gold and 0.9 metres at 8.1g/t gold.

Figure 1. Map of the Goornong South area showing the diamond drill holes completed by S2 so far, gold oxide mineralised zone (historic RC drilling) and Kirkland Lake diamond drill holes drilled immediately prior to their relinquishment of the ground, aimed at testing the southerly down plunge continuation of this zone. Note, the O'Dwyer's Fault (which contains the Robbins Hill and Curie zones further south) both extend through this area.

SFVD0005 terminated at 784.3 metres, having intersected a number of zones of gold mineralisation related to offsetting faults and also to intrusive dykes within the axial plane of the anticline. Key intercepts are as follows:

  • 5.0 metres at 3.5g/t gold from 319 metres
  • 6.2 metres at 1.9g/t gold from 395 metres
  • 0.7 metres at 6.9g/t gold from 409.6 metres
  • 3.0 metres at 2.5g/t gold from 430 metres
  • 4.0 metres at 1.3g/t gold from 453 metres
  • 3.0 metres at 9.2g/t gold from 477 metres, including 0.5 metres at 33.0g/t gold from 477.6 metres
  • 10.2 metres at 4.2g/t gold from 485 metres, including 0.7 metres at 37.9g/t gold from 492.8 metres
  • 4.1 metres at 1.9g/t gold from 641 metres
  • 0.5 metres at 3.2g/t gold from 667.5 metres

Hole SFVD0006, designed to intersect the potential continuation of this mineralisation some 200-250 metres down plunge, is in progress.

Hole SFVD0004, which was terminated early due to flooding and which will be re-entered and deepened, is located some 600 metres up plunge from SFVD0005 and 200 metres down plunge from SFVD0003.

Figure 2. Long projection of the Goornong area showing the four holes drilled parallel to the axial plane of the fold. Hole SFVD0005 is located approximately 800 metres down plunge to the south of hole SFVD0003. Holes SFVD0004 and 0006 are in progress/awaiting assays.

The mineralised intercepts in hole SFVD0005 occur where relatively low angle faults breach and offset the anticline and are also associated with the brittle fracturing and alteration of intrusive dykes within the core of the anticline. The mineralisation itself occurs as quartz veins within and adjacent to these

faults, and as more pervasive quartz stockworks and sulphide (particularly stibnite) alteration around these veins and within completely altered intrusive dykes (see Figure 3).

Figure 3. Schematic cross section for drill hole SFVD0005 that drilled towards the north down the axial plane, testing multiple structures that cross the favourable anticlinal hinge zone.

The uppermost intercept of 5 metres at 3.5g/t gold in SFVD0005 is located in an east-dipping fault that may be the continuation of the structure which contains 0.9 metres at 8.1g/t gold in hole SFVD0003, some 800 metres up plunge.

The intercepts in the middle part of hole SFVD0005 appear to be associated with a pervasively altered and mineralised dyke within the core of the fold.

The intercept of 10.2 metres at 4.2g/t gold is associated with a west dipping fault, as is the intercept of 4.1 metres at 1.9g/t gold some 100 metres vertically below it.

Overall, these results show that the south plunging anticline persists for a long distance, that itis offset by several vertically stacked low angle faults, and that these structures are indeed gold-bearing. The identification of mineralisation in holes drilled at such a distance apart is considered very encouraging, and the outcomes of holes 4 and 6 will further build the structural picture and provide a good basis for considering the next steps.

Goornong prospect background

Previous exploration has identified a strongly mineralised corridor centred on the Goornong South prospect where drilling during the 1990's intersected significant oxide gold mineralisation. During the last year that the exploration licence was held by Kirkland Lake (now Agnico Eagle) a series of diamond drill holes were completed to the south along strike of the historic oxide mineralisation. S2 Resources has been able to relog the Kirkland Lake core holes and use the information to interpret the stratigraphic and structural architecture of what is now interpreted to be the next parallel structure to the east of the O'Dwyers and Fosterville trends, which host the orebodies being mined by Agnico Eagle. This first drill program by S2 Resources, is testing immediately beneath and down plunge to the south of the Goornong South oxide mineralisation, testing multiple structures where they cross the main anticline that is interpreted to be the focus for mineralised fluids. Along the favourable anticline corridor any mineralised structure could refract into a favourable dilation position with the potential to form a significant high-grade trap for gold mineralisation akin to the Swan Zone (the Swan Zone, located along the Fosterville trend, had an initial Mineral Ore Reserve of 2.34Moz of gold at a grade of 49.6g/t, refer to the NI 43-101 Report dated 31 December 2018).

To effectively test for significant mineralisation along the Goornong South anticline trend S2 Resources is undertaking a combination of conventional across strike holes in the shallower part of the system and unconventional strike parallel holes down the axial plane of the target anticline corridor that test multiple structural positions that cross the anticline (see Figure 4). The axial plane holes are designed to test positions down plunge to the south of the oxide gold mineralisation as well as numerous other mineralised structures intersected by the historic diamond drilling completed by Kirkland Lake, anyone which could yield a significant discovery where they refract and dilate across the fold corridor.

The strike parallel holes drilling down the axial plane will continue to 800 metres depth. This will allow these drill holes to test for multiple structural levels within the anticline corridor. It is interpreted that favourable geometry for significant mineralisation will be where structures refract into relatively flat positions across strike, where they pass through the hinge zone. Current interpretations provide for south plunging anticline hinge zones and a parallel plunge to mineralised fault intersections. Drilling is angled towards the north to provide the optimal intersection angle for south plunging shoots, with angled drilling enabling core orientation and detailed structural measurements which are vital to

interpreting the three-dimensional position of structures relative to local stratigraphy and the overall architecture, such that any near misses can be interpreted for later drill follow-up.

The first pass drill program is designed to deliver a more detailed understanding of the structural and stratigraphic architecture of the Goornong South trend. The shallow drill holes beneath the oxide gold mineralisation will provide the firstoriented core holes acrossthe entire width of the anticline corridor, proximal to significant gold mineralisation so as to provide critical information on the orientation and continuity of gold mineralised structures at this location. The deeper axial plane parallel drill holes are spaced to provide a better understanding of the distribution of alteration, the validity of the overall south plunging fold model, and the potential to identify a larger mineralised shoot early in the exploration program. Drilling will be a direct test of some specific target positions interpreted from previous drilling, as well as providing new information with which to vector towards targets in subsequent follow-up drill campaigns.

The broad spacing of these holes is tailored to finding a large gold deposit, so it is important to not be mesmerised by narrow high grade intercepts and to not drill too close too soon – a situation that can result in over-drilling and overspending for too few ounces defined. As previously stated, itis important to first understand the overall three dimensional stratigraphic and structural architecture before attempting to zero in on sweet spots.

Figure 4. Schematic block model of the Goornong area showing the south plunging fold structures and the targeted fault structures intersecting anticlines. Drilling will include both across strike (conventional) testing of mineralised structures (as shown in the cross sectional slices) and along strike (non-conventional) testing of multiple structural positions within the favourable Goornong anticline trend (as shown in the long sectional slices). Drillhole positions are illustrative only and locations may vary.

Project background

S2's 100% owned subsidiary, Southern Star Exploration Pty Ltd, was announced as the winner of the highly competitive tender for the sole right to apply for an Exploration Licence (EL) over the ground surrounding Agnico Eagle's (Agnico) world class Fosterville gold mine in October 2021 (see S2 ASX announcement of 29th October 2021). The EL application was submitted in late 2021, and various Traditional Owner-related preconditions were satisfied recently (see S2 ASX announcement of 4 th July 2023). The ground was granted as Exploration Licence 7795 (EL7795) in early October (see S2 ASX announcement of 4 th October 2023), and covers an area of 394 square kilometres, extending 55 kilometres north to south, and abuts and surrounds Agnico Eagle's Fosterville mine lease. By virtue of its position, its size, and its inherent prospectivity, EL7795 is a highly strategic asset. EL7795 has a minimum expenditure commitment of A$10.4 million over the first five year term of the licence, inclusive of a minimum A$2.1 million commitment in the first two years.

As winners of the tender, S2 has also inherited a substantial amount of data acquired by previous explorers over the area, including the relatively recent exploration work undertaken by Kirkland Lake Gold (the owner of Fosterville prior to its acquisition by Agnico) on the tenement before it expired.

This data includes extensive and high quality geophysical and geochemical surveys such as gravity, induced polarisation (IP), electromagnetic (EM), seismic, magnetic and LIDAR surveys, which are being used to generate drill targets. The inheritance of such a significant amount of data represents a huge saving for the Company in terms of time and money that would otherwise be required to get it to the point of having drill ready targets for testing.

It also includes drilling data and drill core from holes drilled immediately prior to the expiry of the previous tenement, which although widely spaced and/or shallow and/or highly localised, have identified gold mineralisation in several locations. As a consequence, the Company has a range of targets at various stages of definition from early stage reconnaissance up to and including defined prospects simply requiring further drilling to determine the extent and quality of gold mineralisation at those locations.

These targets are located on a mix of Crown Land, freehold land (both broadacre farms and smaller blocks), and road reserves, which require the Company to obtain land access agreements and other relevant permits, as well as heritage clearances, before commencing exploration1 .

1 Until such time as access consents are obtained there is no guarantee that the Company will be able to access freehold property, but a substantial amount of drilling can be undertaken from roadsides.

This announcement has been provided to the ASX under the authorisation of the S2 Board.

For further information, please contact: Mark Bennett Executive Chairman +61 8 6166 0240

Past Exploration results reported in this announcement have been previously prepared and disclosed by S2 Resources Ltd in accordance with JORC 2012. The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in these market announcements. The Company confirms that the form and content in which the Competent Person's findings are presented here have not been materially modified from the original market announcement. Refer to www.s2resources.com.au for details on past exploration results.

Competent Persons statement

Information in this report that relates to Exploration Results from Victoria is based on information compiled by Rohan Worland, who is an employee and equity holder of the Company. Mr Worland is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (AIG) and has sufficient experience of relevance to the style of mineralization and the types of deposits under consideration, and to the activities undertaken, to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the Joint Ore Reserves Committee (JORC) Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves. Mr Worland consents to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on information in the form and context in which it appears.

Information in this report that relates to Exploration Results from Western Australia, New South Wales and Finland is based on information compiled by John Bartlett, who is an employee and equity holder of the Company. Mr Bartlett is a member of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM) and has sufficient experience of relevance to the style of mineralization and the types of deposits under consideration, and to the activities undertaken, to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the Joint Ore Reserves Committee (JORC) Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves. Mr Bartlett consents to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on information in the form and context in which it appears.

Hole ID Easting(MGA) Northing(MGA) Elevation(m) Dip Azimuth Depth (m) DrillType
SFVD0001 278,077 5,943,299 146.0 -40 92 411.9 DD
SFVD0002 278,644 5,942,479 147.0 -45 86 484.6 DD
SFVD0003 278,425 5,942,519 147.8 -42 346 664.1 DD
SFVD0004 278,425 5,942,519 147.8 -75 350 In progress DD
SFVD0005 278,467 5,941,672 148.2 -45 356 784.3 DD
SFVD0006 278,467 5,941,672 148.2 -75 002 In progress DD

Table 1: S2 Drill Collars

Hole ID From (m) To (m) Interval(m) Au (g/t)
SFVD0001 235.10 236.75 1.65 4.5
SFVD0001 240.8 241.3 0.50 5.3
SFVD0002 170 170.7 0.70 1.3
SFVD0002 445.1 447.2 2.10 2.1
SFVD0003 54 65 11.00 1.1
SFVD0003 173.5 176 2.50 1.5
SFVD0003 184.00 199.80 15.80 1.6
including 193.4 193.8 0.40 7.5
SFVD0003 378.9 379.8 0.90 8.1
SFVD0003 604 606 2.00 1.3
SFVD0003 627 628 1.00 1.2
SFVD0005 319 324 5.00 3.5
SFVD0005 395 401.2 6.20 1.9
SFVD0005 409.6 410.3 0.70 6.9
SFVD0005 430 433 3.00 2.5
SFVD0005 453 457 4.00 1.3
SFVD0005 465 466 1.00 1.1
SFVD0005 477 480 3.00 9.2
including 477.60 478.10 0.50 33.0
SFVD0005 485 495.2 10.20 4.2
including 492.8 493.5 0.70 37.9
SFVD0005 641 645.1 4.10 1.9
SFVD0005 667.5 668 0.50 3.2

Table 2: S2 Drill Assays (>5g/t gold grades shown in bold)

Table 3: Historic Drill Collars

Hole ID Easting(MGA) Northing(MGA) Elevation(m) Dip Azimuth Depth(m) DrillType
GSDD073 278,265 5,943,281 147.7 - 258.1 69 DD
GSDD081 278,070 5,943,280 146.2 84.0- 99.5 246.8 DD
GSDD082 278,069 5,943,279 146.2 40.0- 99.5 261.1 DD
GSDD083 278,068 5,943,279 146.2 55.0- 99.5 192.5 DD
GSDD084 278,049 5,943,104 146.3 73.0- 99.5 305.6 DD
GSDD085 278,056 5,942,555 147.1 40.0- 99.5 526.7 DD
GSDD086 278,628 5,942,481 147.5 60.0-51.7 261.2 443.4 DD

Level 14, 333 Collins Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia. PO Box 143, Kingsway, WA 6065, Australia ABN 18 606 128 090 T +61 8 6166 0240 F 61 8 6270 5410 E [email protected] W www.s2resources.com.au

278,628 5,942,481 147.5 - 252.1 455.7 DD
278,630 5,942,482 147.4 - 73.2 533.4 DD
278,572 5,941,643 148.9 - 81.2 650 DD
278,568 5,941,645 148.9 - 259.2 434.2 DD
277,165 5,940,959 149.0 - 69.4 16.7 DD
277,163 5,940,959 149.0 - 78.2 402 DD
278,630 5,942,482 147.4 - 73.0 590.5 DD
278,288 5,941,689 148.2 - 39.8 1178.6 DD
278,233 5,943,321 146.8 - 79.1 54 RC
278,217 5,943,367 146.5 - 79.1 60 RC
278,259 5,943,480 147.1 - 253.1 78 RC
278,208 5,943,315 146.7 - 80.1 75 RC
278,236 5,943,284 147.0 - 79.1 67 RC
278,185 5,943,696 147.0 - 81.1 60 RC
278,253 5,943,098 147.6 - 78.1 74 RC
278,216 5,943,269 146.9 - 78.1 86 RC
278,184 5,943,313 146.7 - 78.1 98 RC
45.779.246.050.750.548.664.555.350.049.050.048.049.049.050.050.050.0

Hole ID From (m) To (m) Interval(m) Au (g/t) Hole ID From (m) To (m) Interval(m) Au (g/t)
GSDD073 24 36 12.0 2.5 GSRC032 60 75 15.0 1.4
including 24 30 6.0 4.6 including 72 75 3.0 4.1
including 28 30 2.0 9.3 including 72 74 2.0 5.7
GSDD081 191.9 198.2 6.3 0.7 GSRC033 14 50 36.0 1.6
GSDD082 103.85 126.3 22.5 2.1 including 38 46 8.0 5.6
GSDD082 196 203 7.0 0.3 including 40 44 4.0 7.5
GSDD082 256.3 256.65 0.3 2.1 GSRC038 18 28 10.0 2.5
GSDD084 251.5 255 3.5 6.8 GSRC051 32 38 6.0 2.7
including 251.95 254 2.1 11.2 GSRC058 14 34 20.0 2.2
GSDD084 281.55 286 4.5 1.6 and 16 18 2.0 7.9
including 281.55 284 2.5 2.6 GSRC058 56 74 18.0 1.8
including 281.55 282.4 0.8 5.2 including 64 72 8.0 3.6
GSDD088 213.1 217 3.9 1.5 GSRC062 52 66 14.0 1.0
including 213.1 215 1.9 3.0 including 52 56 4.0 3.3
GSDD088 213.1 214 0.9 5.0 GSRC062 70 94 24.0 5.0
GSDD088 448.9 451 2.1 2.3 including 88 90 2.0 29.4
including 449.9 450.6 0.7 5.9
GSDD090 80.2 87.7 7.5 2.3
including 84.8 86.5 1.7 6.0
GSDD090 207.1 212.8 5.7 2.2
Including 211.05 211.6 0.5 7.9
GSDD094 437 461.5 24.5 1.3
including 438.7 444.4 5.7 2.0
and 454 461.5 7.5 2.2
including 460.1 461 0.9 6.7
GSDD094 576.5 576.95 0.5 6.9
GSDD096 350.2 363.8 13.6 1.5
including 357.4 363.2 5.8 3.2
including 360.55 361.45 0.9 5.7
GSDD096 383.65 404.85 21.2 0.9
including 399.2 404.85 5.7 2.1
including 403.85 404.85 1.0 6.6
GSRC014 50 54 4.0 2.3
including 50 52 2.0 4.6
GSRC028 4 26 22.0 2.1
including 6 18 12.0 3.7
including 12 14 2.0 16.3
GSRC031 12 40 28.0 1.9
including 32 36 4.0 11.0
including 32 34 2.0 17.2

Table 4: Historic Drill Assays (>5g/t gold grades shown in bold)

The following Tables are provided to ensure compliance with the JORC code (2012) edition requirements for the reporting of exploration results.

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Samplingtechniques Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels, Historic drilling from surface includes diamond core andReverse Circulation (RC).
random chips, or specific specialised industrystandard measurement tools appropriate to theminerals under investigation, such as down holegamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc).These examples should not be taken as limiting thebroad meaning of sampling. All historical drilling data has been obtained from open filereporting, the majority which was compiled and reported byKirland Lake Gold in the EL3539 Final Relinquishment Report(2019). Data has been reviewed, appraised and integratedinto a database. Data is of sufficient quality, relevance andapplicability.
All 2023-24 drilling was diamond core drilling from surfacecompleted by Deepcore Australia Pty Ltd, based out ofBendigo, Victoria.
Include reference to measures taken to ensuresample representivity and the appropriate No information about the historic QAQC procedures havebeen compiled.
calibration of any measurement tools or systemsused All 2023-24 core is split in half by core saw for externallaboratory preparation and analysis.
Aspects of the determination of mineralisationthat are Material to the Public Report. In caseswhere 'industry standard' work has been done thiswould be relatively simple (e.g. 'reverse circulationdrilling was used to obtain 1 m samples fromwhich 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 gcharge for fire assay'). In other cases moreexplanation may be required, such as where thereis coarse gold that has inherent samplingproblems. Unusual commodities or mineralisationtypes (e.g. submarine nodules) may warrantdisclosure of detailed information Historic sampling intervals were typically 0.3 to 2.0m forcore and 1 to 4m for RC. Core was typically split in half bycore saw. All samples were sent to an external laboratoryfor preparation and analysis. Based on the distribution ofmineralisation the sample size is considered adequate forrepresentative sampling.Based on the distribution of mineralisation the core samplesize is considered adequate for representative sampling.
Drilling techniques Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open-holehammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic,etc) and details (e.g. core diameter, triple or Historic drilling from surface includes diamond core andReverse Circulation (RC). Diamond core is oriented. No detailsabout hole diameter have been compiled.
standard tube, depth of diamond tails, facesampling bit or other type, whether core isoriented and if so, by what method, etc). All 2023-24 drilling was diamond core from surface, HQ andNQ3 size. NQ3 core is triple tube wireline. Core orientationuses the Axis Camp Ori tool.
Drill samplerecovery Method of recording and assessing core and chip Historic core recoveries have been compiled. No informationabout historic chip sample recoveries has been compiled.
sample recoveries and results assessed 2023-24 drilling methods are selected to ensure maximumrecovery possible.
Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and No historic information about maximising sample recoveryhas been compiled.
ensure representative nature of the samples 2023-24 core recovery is collected in a set of standard Exceltemplates then transferred to the digital database.
Whether a relationship exists between samplerecovery and grade and whether sample bias mayhave occurred due to preferential loss/gain offine/coarse material. A link between sample recovery and grade is not apparent.

SECTION 1: SAMPLING TECHNIQUES AND DATA

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Logging Whether core and chip samples have beengeologically and geotechnically logged to a level ofdetail to support appropriate Mineral Resourceestimation, mining studies and metallurgicalstudies. The compilation of historic diamond core and RC drillingincludes records of lithology, alteration, structure andrecovery.All 2023-24 diamond core undergoes geotechnical andgeological logging to a level of detail (quantitative andqualitative) sufficient to support use of the data in allcategories of Mineral Resource estimation. Diamond corelogging includes records of lithology, alteration, veining,structure and recovery.
Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative innature. Core (or costean, channel, etc)photography. The compilation of historic diamond core and RC logging isquantitative and qualitative. Core photography is available.All 2023-24 core is photographed.
The total length and percentage of the relevantintersections logged The compilation of historic diamond core and RC logging iscomprehensive for all exploration results reported. S2Rgeologists and consultants have been able to relog 80% of thecore for the Goornong South prospect.All 2023-24 drill holes are logged in full.
Sub-samplingtechniques andsample preparation If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter,half or all core taken. Core is split in half by core saw and one-half sampled andsubmitted to the laboratory for analysis.
If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotarysplit, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. No non-core sampling was compiled.
For all sample types, the nature, quality andappropriateness of the sample preparationtechnique. Historic samples were submitted to reputable commerciallaboratories (OSLS Bendigo and Bureau Veritas Adelaide) thatused standard industry preparation techniques.2023-24 core samples are submitted to On Site LaboratoryServices (OSLS, Bendigo) and undergo standard industryprocedure sample preparation (crush, pulverise and split)appropriate to the sample type and mineralisation style.
Quality control procedures adopted for all subsampling stages to maximise representivity ofsamples. Historic reports note QAQC protocols but no data has beencompiled to assess the QAQC results.Full QAQC system is in place for 2023-24 core assays todetermine accuracy and precision of assays.
Measures taken to ensure that the sampling isrepresentative of the in situ material collected,including for instance results for fieldduplicate/second-half sampling. No information regarding the representativity of the historicsampling has been compiled.2023-24 core is cut to achieve non-biased samples. Noduplicate samples have been collected at this stage.
Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grainsize of the material being sampled. Sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the materialbeing sampled.

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Quality of assaydata and laboratorytests Historic core and RC samples were analysed for Au by OSLS(Bendigo) using a 25g fire assay with AAS finish (PE01S) or byBureau Veritas (Adelaide) using a 40g fire assay with AASfinish (FA001).
The nature, quality and appropriateness of theassaying and laboratory procedures used andwhether the technique is considered partial ortotal. Historic core and RC samples were analysed for a variablesuite of multi-elements by OSLS (Bendigo) using methodB010 (aqua regia digest and ICP-AES finish) or by BureauVeritas (Adelaide) by technique MA101/102 (four acid digestand ICP-AES/MS finish).
Historic assay for Au is considered total. Multi-element assayfour acid digest are considered near-total for all but the mostresistive minerals (not of relevance). Aqua-regia digestion isconsidered partial depending on element and mineralspresent, but sulphide minerals as seen on the project arereadily and completely digestible.
Core samples are submitted to OSLS (Bendigo) for analysis.Au is assayed using a 25g fire assay with AAS finish (PE01S). Amulti-element suite of 32 elements is assayed by techniqueBM020/ICP050 (1g charge by four acid digest and ICP-MSfinish).
The nature and quality of the analytical technique is deemedappropriate for the mineralisation style. Fire assay for Au isconsidered total. Multi-element assay four acid digest areconsidered near-total for all but the most resistive minerals(not of relevance).
For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheldXRF instruments, etc, the parameters used indetermining the analysis including instrumentmake and model, reading times, calibrationsfactors applied and their derivation, etc. No geophysical tools were used to determine any elementconcentrations.
Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g.standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory Historic reports note QAQC protocols, but no data has beencompiled to assess the QAQC results.
checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy(i.e. lack of bias) and precision have beenestablished. Full QAQC system is in place for 2023-24 core sample assaysincluding blanks and standards (relevant certified referencematerial).
Verification ofsampling andassaying The verification of significant intersections byeither independent or alternative companypersonnel. All assay results are checked and verified by alternativecompany personnel or independent consultants. Significantassay results prompt a visual review of relevant referencecore for validation purposes.
The use of twinned holes. No twin holes are reported.
Documentation of primary data, data entryprocedures, data verification, data storage(physical and electronic) protocols. All historical drilling data has been obtained from open filereporting, the majority which was compiled and reported byKirland Lake Gold in the EL3539 Final Relinquishment Report(2019). Data has been reviewed, appraised and integratedinto S2's central database.For 2023-24 drilling the primary sampling data is collected in
a set of standard Excel templates. The information ismanaged by S2's database manager for validation andcompilation into S2's central database.
Discuss any adjustment to assay data. No adjustments made.

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Location of datapoints Most historic drill collar locations were recorded using ahandheld GPS with a small number of drill collars recordedusing a differential GPS.
Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locatedrillholes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches,mine workings and other locations used in Mineral All 2023-24 diamond drill holes are surveyed by handheldGPS in the first instance.
Resource estimation. All 2023-24 diamond drill holes are surveyed downholeusing the Axis Champ Gyro at approximately 12m intervalsto determine accurate drill trace locations. There is nomagnetic interference with respect to downhole surveys.
Specification of the grid system used. The grid system is MGA GDA94 (Zone 55). Local easting andnorthing are in MGA.
Quality and adequacy of topographic control. Topographic control is provided by a high-resolution LiDARsurvey DEM. The accuracy of the DEM is +/-1m.
Data spacing anddistribution Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. Data spacing (drill holes) is variable and appropriate to thegeology.
Whether the data spacing and distribution issufficient to establish the degree of geological andgrade continuity appropriate for the MineralResource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s)and classifications applied. No Mineral Resource or Ore Reserve estimation is reported.
Whether sample compositing has been applied. No sample compositing has been applied.
Orientation of datain relation togeological structure Whether the orientation of sampling achievesunbiased sampling of possible structures and theextent to which this is known, considering thedeposit type. The drill holes may not necessarily be perpendicular to theorientation of the intersected mineralisation. Mineralisedstructures have multiple orientations. Some ofthemineralised structures are intersected at low angles to thedrill holes resulting in multiple intersections of the samemineralised structure, though for the majority of drillingthere is no significant orientation-based sampling bias.Reported intersections are down-hole intervals and not truewidths.
If the relationship between the drilling orientationand the orientation of key mineralised structures isconsidered to have introduced a sampling bias,this should be assessed and reported if material. Where the drilling orientation intersects a mineralisedstructure at a low angle appropriate commentary is providedin the body of the report.
No information regarding the historic sample security hasbeen compiled.
Sample security The measures taken to ensure sample security. Chain of custody is managed by S2 personnel. Drill core isvisually checked at the drill rig and then transported to S2'sBendigo facility where it is cut and sampled before beingsecured in bags with a security seal. Bagged samples aretransported to the OSLS laboratory in Bendigo by S2personnel.
Audits or reviews The results of any audits or reviews of sampling No records of any audits or reviews of historic sampling havebeen compiled to date.
techniques and data. No audits or reviews have been conducted for 2023-24drilling activities.

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Mineral tenementand land tenurestatus The Greater Fosterville Project consists of two grantedexploration licences (EL7795 & EL8074) and two deferredexploration licence applications (EL8166 & EL8167) in theState of Victoria. The tenements are owned by Southern StarExploration Pty Ltd (SSE), a wholly owned subsidiary of S2Resources Ltd.
Type, reference name/number, location andownership including agreements or material issueswith third parties such as joint ventures,partnerships, overriding royalties, native titleinterests, historical sites, wilderness or nationalpark and environmental settings. The Greater Fosterville Project is located within Recognitionand Settlement Agreement Areas held by the Dja DjaWurrung Clans Aboriginal Corporation (DJAARA) and theTaungurungLandandWatersCouncilAboriginalCorporation(TLaWC)undertheTraditionalOwnerSettlement Act 2010 (Vic).
Access and compensation agreements are required toconduct work on freehold land and while it is hoped thatlandowners will agree to these there is no guarantee thatthey will be forthcoming.
EL7795 & EL8074 are current and in good standing.
The security of the tenure held at the time ofreporting along with any known impediments toobtaining a licence to operate in the area. EL8166 & EL8167 are deferred applications following acompetitive assessment that resulted in the governmentselecting an alternate preferred applicant. EL8166 & EL8167will remain in abeyance until the highest ranked applicationis either granted or refused.
Exploration done byother parties Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration byother parties. The Greater Fosterville Project has seen explorationconducted by the various owners of the Fosterville GoldMine that has included Perseverance Exploration CompanyLtd, Northgate Minerals, AuRico Gold, Crocodile Gold,Newmarket and Kirkland Lake Gold over the period 1989-2019. Historic exploration has also included work by PlanetMining Company Pty Ltd (1965-70), Lone Star ExplorationNL (1973-74), Noranda Australia Ltd (1974-76), BrunswickNL (1989-92), Bendigo Gold Associates (1989-92), BHPMinerals Ltd (1986-90), Western Mining CorporationLimited (1978-89) and Rio Tinto Exploration Pty Ltd (1980-1988).All historical work has been obtained from open filereporting, the majority which was compiled and reportedby Kirland Lake Gold in the EL3539 Final RelinquishmentReport (2019). Data has been reviewed, appraised and
integrated into a database. Data is of sufficient quality,relevance and applicability.
Geology Deposit type, geological setting and style of The deposit style sought is orogenic gold mineralisationlocated in the Bendigo Zone of the Victorian Gold Province.The Fosterville Goldfield is hosted by Lower Ordovicianturbidites within the Castlemaine Group rocks. The
mineralisation. sequence is metamorphosed to sub-greenschist facies.Gold mineralisation is typically hosted by quartz reefslocated in fold and fault structures related to multiplecompression events that formed upright chevron style foldgeometry.

SECTION 2: REPORTING OF EXPLORATION RESULTS

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Drill holeInformation A summary of all information material to theunderstanding of the exploration results includinga tabulation of the following information for allMaterial drill holes:•easting and northing of the drill holecollar•elevation or RL (Reduced Level –elevation above sea level in metres) ofthe drill hole collar•dip and azimuth of the hole•down hole length and interceptiondepth•hole length. A table of completed drill hole collar information forexploration results presented here is provided below.
Data aggregationmethods In reporting Exploration Results, weightingaveraging techniques, maximum and/or minimumgrade truncations (e.g. cutting of high grades) andcut-off grades are usually Material and should bestated. All Exploration Results reported are downhole weightedmeans.
Where aggregate intercepts incorporate shortlengths of high grade results and longer lengths oflow grade results, the procedure used for suchaggregation should be stated and some typicalexamples of such aggregations should be shown indetail. A table of significant intercepts presented here is providedbelow.
The assumptions used for any reporting of metalequivalent values should be clearly stated. No metal equivalent values are reported.
Relationshipbetweenmineralisationwidths and interceptlengths These relationships are particularly important inthe reporting of Exploration Results.If the geometry of the mineralisation with respectto the drill hole angle is known, its nature shouldbe reported.If it is not known and only the down hole lengthsare reported, there should be a clear statement tothis effect (e.g. 'down hole length, true width notknown'). The relationship between mineralization and drill holeangle is not fully understood, therefore the down holemineralized and composited lengths are shown. A truewidth is not known at this time.
Diagram Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) andtabulations of intercepts should be included forany significant discovery being reported Theseshould include, but not be limited to a plan view ofdrill hole collar locations and appropriate sectionalviews. Appropriate maps, sections and tables are included in thebody of the report.
Balanced reporting Where comprehensive reporting of all ExplorationResults is not practicable, representative reportingof both low and high grades and/or widths shouldbe practiced to avoid misleading reporting ofExploration Results. Maps showing individual sample locations are included inthe report.All results considered significant are reported.
Other substantiveexploration data Other exploration data, if meaningful andmaterial, should be reported including (but notlimited to): geological observations; geophysicalsurvey results; geochemical survey results; bulksamples – size and method of treatment;metallurgical test results; bulk density,groundwater, geotechnical and rockcharacteristics; potential deleterious orcontaminating substances. Previous exploration data reported include historic dipoledipole IP-resistivity surveys (refer ASX Announcement 17February 2023), historic RC and diamond drilling (ASXAnnouncement 20 October 2023) and earlier diamonddrilling from the current program (ASX Announcement 28December 2023).Other historical exploration data has not yet been compiledto a level where it can be reported. Further compilation ofsuch data will be reviewed and reported when consideredmaterial.

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Further work The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g.tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions orlarge-scale step-out drilling).Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possibleextensions, including the main geologicalinterpretations and future drilling areas, providedthis information is not commercially sensitive The initial diamond drilling program to test targets definedby historical data at Goornong South is in progress, and iscontinuing during Q1 2024.Broader surface exploration activities including IP-resistivityand soil geochemical surveys are being planned for 2024 togenerate new targets for drill testing.