AI assistant
RURAL FUNDS GROUP — Annual Report 2016
Aug 24, 2016
65689_rns_2016-08-24_7b0553f9-2c94-4fe0-91c5-6480645095de.pdf
Annual Report
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
==> picture [596 x 421] intentionally omitted <==
Rural Funds Group Annual Report for the year ended 30 June 2016
Rural Funds Group (ASX: RFF) stapled group comprising: Rural Funds Trust ARSN 112 951 578 and RF Active ARSN 168 740 805 Responsible Entity: Rural Funds Management Limited ACN 077 492 838 AFSL 226701
Issued on: 25 August 2016
==> picture [139 x 45] intentionally omitted <==
Contents
Letter from the Managing Director ....................................................................................2 Corporate governance statement ......................................................................................5 ASX additional information .................................................................................................... 22 Financial statements ....................................................................................................................24
Letter from the Managing Director
Dear Unitholder
We are pleased to present the financial accounts for the Rural Funds Group (ASX: RFF) for the financial year 2015-2016 (FY16).
RFF at 30 June 2016
You are part of a group of around 4,000 investors that at the end of the financial year owned assets worth $407m which includes over 65,000 megalitres of water entitlements. Your fund’s agricultural property assets are diversified across almond orchards, poultry farms, vineyards, macadamia orchards, and associated water entitlements. These assets are leased to experienced tenants operating the properties on long lease terms. The portfolio had a weighted average lease expiry of 13.8 years at 30 June 2016.
RFF provided total returns of 54% over the financial year, the highest return of any ASX-listed Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT). A number of factors have contributed to this result, including higher awareness of the fund, inclusion in the S&P ASX300 Index, earnings accretive acquisitions and significant increases in the market value of our assets. While we do not expect such outperformance every year, the returns received by unitholders in FY16 are nonetheless very pleasing.
Review of financial year 2016
Consumer demand has maintained almond processors’ desire to secure further supply through new almond plantings. RFF raised $35m of equity in October 2015 to fund the purchase of the Kerarbury property near Darlington Point, New South Wales. Olam Orchards Australia have leased Kerarbury until 2038 and are developing a 1,500 ha almond orchard on the property.
RFM released a climate discussion paper in June 2016 designed to articulate the benefits of diversifying RFF’s agricultural property portfolio into geographically dispersed climatic regions. This is available on the RFM website under ‘key documents’ and I urge you to read it as it relates to the strategy behind the acquisitions outlined below.
In February 2016, RFF made its first acquisition in Western Australia (WA), with a $5m investment for a 9% stake in Perth Markets Limited, which is expected to be earnings accretive and provides an introduction to the WA agricultural sector.
The fund took an initial step into the macadamia industry in March 2016 with the $9m acquisition of three orchards outside Bundaberg, Queensland. This provides exposure to a new commodity and a new climatic zone at a more northern latitude than RFF’s existing assets.
A rental increase for an almond orchard tenant following a scheduled rent review in May 2016 led to the announcement of a forecast FY17 distribution increase of 8%. Beyond this one-off increase, the distribution growth rate is expected to return to the previous forecast of 4%. This demonstrates how indexation and rent review mechanisms underpin growth in distributions to RFF unitholders.
Although the transaction occurred outside of the FY16 period, it is worth mentioning that in July 2016, RFF completed a $61.0m equity raising to fund acquisitions in three sectors. Funds are being deployed to purchase three cattle properties in northern and central Queensland, fund an additional 1,000 ha of almond orchard development on Kerarbury and fund the three Queensland macadamia orchards, which were initially debt funded.
2
The cattle sector in particular provides a positive outlook with growing export market demand for Australian beef and potential for capital growth as cattle property prices are yet to reflect the record high beef prices experienced in the last 18 months. The Kerarbury almond investment significantly grows the RFF development pipeline.
Looking ahead to FY17
The RFF payout ratio is measured as distributions per unit (DPU) divided by adjusted funds from operations per unit (AFFO). Since listing in 2014, RFF has maintained a payout ratio around 95%. In FY17 we are forecasting DPU of 9.64 cents funded from AFFO of 12.42 cents, which represents a lowering of the payout ratio to 78%.
Using retained earnings to fund investment provides the advantage of lower transaction costs, allowing the fund to continue making investments with flexibility and efficiency. This lower payout ratio creates more retained earnings which are a key part of the funding of the ongoing Kerarbury almond orchard development, as well as providing scope to pursue new investments. However, RFM continues to investigate opportunities that may be funded by an expansion of the fund’s equity base.
It is expected that RFF will invest a further $51m on its almond orchards in FY17. Of this amount, $13m relates to the purchase of water entitlements, with the balance being infrastructure and development costs. The following table has been included to highlight the substantial near-term growth in RFF almond assets. It shows the forecast capital expenditure through to completion for each of the orchards under development. At completion, RFF will own a total of 4,900 hectares of almond orchards, which, based on valuations of around $80,000 per hectare would have a market value of approximately $390m.
RFF almond development pipeline FY17-FY20
==> picture [440 x 114] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
ALMOND DEVELOPMENTS FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 TOTAL
Kerarbury $43.9m $37.3m $18.3m $9.4m $108.9m
Tocabil, Yilgah & Mooral $6.7m $5.5m $4.5m $0.3m $17.1m
TOTAL DEVELOPMENT $50.6m $42.8m $22.8m $9.7m $126m
----- End of picture text -----
The table shows that the RFF has a $126m development pipeline without the need to raise further equity, while maintaining a desired gearing target of 35%, plus or minus five percentage points.
Should the opportunities arise, RFM will continue to pursue new investments that will benefit RFF. Further expansion in the Queensland cattle sector is possible dependent on securing suitable counterparts, while expansion in the macadamia sector will be investigated. Activities in these sectors are in line with the strategy of climatic diversification.
Looking beyond the assets of RFF into the wider world, it is worth observing that RFF, like all REITs, is benefiting from the present unprecedented low interest environment in a number of ways. Low interest rates have reduced the cost of RFF’s debt and made the distributions paid to unitholders more attractive. The latter observation has probably increased the market price of RFF units, causing the yield compression that is common across all assets globally.
Economists and central bankers around the world are stating that economic growth, inflation and interest rates are likely to remain low for a long time. If this is correct, there will be profound consequences for investors – such as the owners of RFF - just as there will be consequences for RFF.
3
Rural Funds Group Annual Report 2016
In theory we should see farm values rise as investors and farmers acquire them on lower projected rates of return, and we should see lease rental rates reduce as lessees demand lower rents. While these movements have already been observed in the residential and commercial property sectors, this has not been our observation in the agricultural sector.
Farm values rose rapidly in the previous decade, driven by an increase in bank lending into the sector. Following the Global Financial Crisis (GFC), farm values declined marginally as a consequence of the collapse and therefore withdrawal of the companies that operated Managed Investment Schemes and as banks reduced the loan to value ratios at which they would lend to farmers. Since then farm values have recovered and in most sectors, values would now exceed those prior to the GFC.
During this period, agricultural commodity values and farm productivity (mainly crop yields) have also increased. As a consequence, the operating return that can be achieved by farmers, including RFF’s lessees, has either remained constant or actually increased marginally. For this reason, we do not believe that there has been a general compression in farm operating returns as a consequence of the prevailing or prospective low interest rate environment.
These observations of the current favourable economic environment for farm ownership present both opportunity and cause for caution. It is still possible to acquire farms and lease them at satisfactory rates of return because the returns being achieved from farming operations are supportive. However, it is possible that over time farm values, particularly for the larger farms sought by institutional investors, will increase as continued low interest rates fuel more debt or more foreign investment. For this reason, we must continue to seek assets with attractive lease rentals supported by the productivity of their farming operations and the ability of both your manager and RFF’s lessees, to increase productivity through capital improvements and good management.
Yours faithfully
==> picture [186 x 78] intentionally omitted <==
David Bryant Managing Director Rural Funds Management Limited
4
Corporate governance statement
| Defnitions | |
|---|---|
| ASIC | Australian Securities and Investments Commission |
| ASX | Australian Securities Exchange or ASX Limited |
| Corporations Act | Corporations Act 2001 |
The Rural Funds Group (the Fund) is listed on the ASX and comprises Rural Funds Trust and RF Active, both registered managed investment schemes under the Corporations Act. Units in Rural Funds Trust are stapled to units in RF Active. Rural Funds Management Limited (the Responsible Entity) is the Responsible Entity for the Fund and has established and oversees the corporate governance of the Fund. The Responsible Entity holds an Australian Financial Services Licence authorising it to operate the Fund. It has a duty to act in the best interest of unitholders of the Fund. The Fund has a compliance plan that has been lodged with ASIC and a copy of the compliance plan can be obtained from ASIC or by contacting the Responsible Entity. The Responsible Entity publishes a number of its corporate governance related policies on its website at:
http://ruralfunds.com.au/rural-funds-group/about/corporate-governance/
The Board takes its corporate governance responsibilities seriously. The Board is comprised of three directors and has a mix of the experience and skills necessary to oversee the corporate governance requirements of the Responsible Entity. This ensures the Responsible Entity operates with integrity, is accountable and acts in a professional and ethical manner. The Board works together and their collective ability facilitates effective decision making to lead a viable, profitable and efficient business.
To the extent that they are applicable and appropriate for the Fund, the Responsible Entity has adopted and complies with the ASX Corporate Governance Council’s Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations 3[rd] Edition. In accordance with the ASX Listing Rule 4.10.3, set out below are the ASX Corporate Governance Council’s eight principles of good corporate governance, and the extent to which there is compliance with the recommendations for each. The statement has been approved by the Board of the Responsible Entity and applies to the period 1 July 2015 to 30 June 2016 (“Statement Period”).
There have been no material changes to the corporate governance policies and practices between 30 June 2016 and the time of printing this statement.
5
Rural Funds Group Annual Report 2016
PRINCIPLE 1:
Lay solid foundations for management and oversight
A listed entity should establish and disclose the respective roles and responsibilities of its board and management and how their performance is monitored and evaluated.
==> picture [441 x 45] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
ASX
RECOMMENDATION FUND’S RESPONSE
----- End of picture text -----
| 1.1 | The business of the Fund is managed under the direction of the Board of the |
|---|---|
| Responsible Entity comprising: | |
| •Chair: Guy Paynter (independent non-executive director) | |
| •Managing Director: David Bryant | |
| •Non-Executive Director: Michael Carroll (independent non-executive director) | |
| The conduct of the Board is governed by the Constitution of the Fund and the | |
| Corporations Act. The broad functions and responsibilities of the Board are | |
| set out in sections 3.3 – 3.4 of the Corporate Governance Charter. The specifc | |
| responsibilities are set out in section 3.5. | |
| The Board has delegated responsibility for the day-to-day management of the | |
| Fund to the Managing Director of the Responsible Entity. The delegations are | |
| outlined in the Corporate Governance Charter. The Managing Director, David | |
| Bryant, is responsible for fnancial; continuous disclosure and compliance | |
| oversight; media and analyst briefngs and responses to member questions; and | |
| ensuring the Board is provided with information to make fully informed decisions. | |
| The constitution of the Fund is available by contacting the Responsible Entity. The | |
| Corporate Governance Charter is available on the Responsible Entity’s website. | |
| 1.2 | As an externally managed scheme, recommendation 1.2 does not apply to the Fund. |
| 1.3 | All directors of the Responsible Entity receive letters of appointment setting out |
| the key terms and conditions of their appointment. | |
| All executives of the Responsible Entity enter into an employment agreement | |
| setting out the key terms and conditions of their employment including a position | |
| description, duties, rights, responsibilities, remuneration and entitlements on | |
| termination. | |
| 1.4 | The Company Secretary of the Responsible Entity is accountable to the Board, |
| through the Chair, on all matters to do with the proper functioning of the Board. | |
| As stated in the Corporate Governance Charter, the Company Secretary reports | |
| directly to the Managing Director. |
6
1.5 The Responsible Entity has a diversity policy. The policy provides the framework by which the Responsible Entity actively manages and encourages diversity and inclusion. It recognises that its employees are one of its greatest assets and it has a range of employees with skills and capabilities that ensure the ongoing strength, continuity and stability of the Responsible Entity. Due to the size of the Responsible Entity’s Board and its senior management team, combined with the limited turnover of personnel at this level, it does not set quantitative gender diversity objectives. The Responsible Entity will endeavour to maintain, or improve its current level of gender diversity as senior management vacancies arise. A copy of the policy is available on the Responsible Entity’s website. The Responsible Entity’s senior executive team includes one female executive (out of a total of three executives). Of the 70 staff, 23 or 33% are female. 1.6 The performance of the Board, its committees and individual directors is outlined in the Corporate Governance Charter. The performance of individual Board members is reviewed annually in accordance with the timelines outlined in the Responsible Entity’s Performance Management Policy. 1.7 The performance of senior executives is reviewed annually in accordance with the timelines outlined in the Responsible Entity’s Performance Management Policy. The annual process reviews each individual’s past performance, their achievement of key performance indicators over the previous 12 months, sets key performance indicators for the coming 12 months, and identifies training and development opportunities. The formal process provides an opportunity for the senior executive and the Managing Director to focus solely on performance and development.
7
Rural Funds Group Annual Report 2016
PRINCIPLE 2:
Structure the board to add value
A listed entity should have a board of an appropriate size, composition, skills and commitment to enable it to discharge its duties effectively.
==> picture [441 x 45] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
ASX
RECOMMENDATION FUND’S RESPONSE
----- End of picture text -----
| 2.1 | As an externally managed scheme, recommendation 2.1 does not apply to the |
|---|---|
| Fund. Additionally, due to the small size of the Responsible Entity’s Board, it is | |
| usual that all of the Board members are involved in the full spectrum of discussion | |
| and decisions on matters. As a result, they bring the full complement of skills and | |
| experience available to address matters. If and when gaps are identifed, external | |
| advice is sought from senior consultants such as specialist tax, legal or business | |
| advisers to address any skills gaps. | |
| 2.2 | As an externally managed scheme, recommendation 2.2 does not apply to the Fund. |
| 2.3 | The Responsible Entity Board comprises three members, two of whom are |
| independent non-executive directors. |
| Director | Commencement | Independent |
|---|---|---|
| David Bryant | 17 February 1997 | No |
| Guy Paynter | 15 April 2010 | Yes |
| Michael Carroll | 15 April 2010 | Yes |
Independent director, Guy Paynter, holds the role of Chair of the Board.
Guy Paynter is a former director of broking firm JB Were and brings to the Responsible Entity more than 30 years of experience in corporate finance. Guy is a former member of the ASX and a former associate of the Securities Institute of Australia (now known as the Financial Services Institute of Australasia). Today, Guy is Chair of Bill Peach Group Limited (previously known as Aircruising Australia Limited).
Guy’s agricultural interests include cattle breeding in the Upper Hunter region in New South Wales.
Guy holds a Bachelor of Laws from the University of Melbourne.
8
==> picture [96 x 89] intentionally omitted <==
David Bryant holds the role of Managing Director.
David Bryant holds 79.68% of shares on issue in the Responsible Entity. David established the Responsible Entity in February 1997. Since then, David has led the organisation with a team that has acquired over $460 million in agricultural assets across eight Australian
agricultural regions. This has included negotiating the acquisition of more than 35 properties and over 79,000 megalitres of water entitlements.
On a day-to-day level, David is responsible for leading the executive team, maintaining key commercial relationships and sourcing new business opportunities. David holds a Diploma of Financial Planning from the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology University and a Master of Agribusiness from the University of Melbourne.
==> picture [96 x 89] intentionally omitted <==
Michael Carroll is a non-executive director and is the Chair of the Audit Committee.
Michael Carroll serves a range of food and agricultural businesses in a Board and advisory capacity. Michael is on the Boards of Tassal Group Ltd, Select Harvests Limited, Paraway Pastoral Company, Sunny Queen Ltd and the
Gardiner Dairy Foundation. Former Board positions include the Australian Farm Institute, Warrnambool Cheese & Butter Factory Company Holdings Limited, Meat & Livestock Australia, Queensland Sugar Limited and Rural Finance Corporation of Victoria.
Michael has senior executive experience in a range of companies, including establishing and leading the National Australia Bank Agribusiness division.
Michael holds a Bachelor of Agricultural Science from La Trobe University and a Master of Business Administration from the University of Melbourne’s Melbourne Business School. Michael has completed the Advanced Management Program at Harvard Business School, Boston, and is a Fellow of the Australian Institute of Company Directors.
Further information on the composition of the Responsible Entity’s Board, executive management and asset and business management profiles, and the skills, knowledge and experience of the individual members can be found on the Responsible Entity’s website.
The independence of the non-executive directors has been ascertained in compliance with the Corporations Act and the ASX Listing Rules and there are no other factors which might reasonably be seen as undermining their independence. All directors must declare actual or potential conflicts of interest and excuse themselves from discussions on issues where an actual or potential conflict of interest arises. The directors’ interests and any subsequent changes have been disclosed to the ASX. The Responsible Entity directors are subject to director rotation consistent with the Responsible Entity’s constitution.
9
Rural Funds Group Annual Report 2016
| 2.4 | As an externally managed scheme, recommendation 2.4 does not apply to the |
|---|---|
| Fund; however, as outlined in 2.3, the Responsible Entity’s Board is comprised of | |
| a majority of independent directors. | |
| 2.5 | As an externally managed scheme, recommendation 2.5 does not apply to the |
| Fund; however, independent non-executive director, Guy Paynter, holds the role of | |
| Chair of the Responsible Entity. | |
| 2.6 | As an externally managed scheme, recommendation 2.6 does not apply to the |
| Fund; however, any new directors would be provided with an induction relevant | |
| to the Responsible Entity and the Fund. Additionally, directors are provided with | |
| opportunities to develop and maintain their skills and knowledge through both | |
| formal and informal training and networking opportunities. |
==> picture [596 x 558] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
10
----- End of picture text -----
PRINCIPLE 3:
Act ethically and responsibly
A listed entity should act ethically and responsibly.
==> picture [440 x 44] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
ASX
RECOMMENDATION FUND’S RESPONSE
----- End of picture text -----
| 3.1 | The Responsible Entity has adopted a Directors’ Code of Conduct (the Code) |
|---|---|
| that sets out the minimum acceptable standards of behaviour. The code seeks | |
| to give directors guidance on how best to perform their duties, meet their | |
| obligations and understand the company’s corporate governance practices. | |
| The code focuses on directors’ obligations to comply with codes and law, | |
| their general duties, their application of business judgement, the application | |
| of independent and sound decision making, confdentiality, improper use | |
| of information, cooperation, personal interests and conficts, conduct and | |
| complaints. | |
| In addition to the Directors’ Code of Conduct, the Responsible Entity has a | |
| general Code of Conduct that is applicable to directors and all staff including | |
| executive managers. The Corporate Governance Charter (which includes | |
| the Directors’ Code of Conduct) and the Code of Conduct is available on the | |
| Responsible Entity’s website. | |
| Both codes are reviewed annually to ensure that they remain current and relevant. |
11
Rural Funds Group Annual Report 2016
PRINCIPLE 4: Safeguard integrity in corporate reporting
A listed entity should have formal and rigorous processes that independently verify and safeguard the integrity of its corporate reporting.
==> picture [441 x 45] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
ASX
RECOMMENDATION FUND’S RESPONSE
----- End of picture text -----
| 4.1 | The Board of Directors of the Responsible Entity has established an audit |
|---|---|
| committee. The purpose of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board in | |
| overseeing the integrity of fnancial reporting, fnancial controls and procedures in | |
| respect of the Fund as well as the independence of the Fund’s external auditors. | |
| The Audit Committee is comprised of two members, both of whom are non- | |
| executive independent directors. An independent director, who is not the Chair | |
| of the Board of the Responsible Entity, is Chair of the Committee. The relevant | |
| qualifcations and experience of the members is available on the Responsible | |
| Entity’s website. | |
| The Audit Committee will routinely invite other individuals to attend meetings, | |
| including executive management and management members of the Responsible | |
| Entity and the Auditor of the Fund. The Audit Committee and invitees will review | |
| the fnancial reports and provide commentary to the Board as required. | |
| Two meetings of the Audit Committee were held in relation to the accounts during | |
| the Statement Period. The Audit Committee ordinarily holds two meetings per | |
| year, or more if required. | |
| The Audit Committee has a formal charter that details the roles and | |
| responsibilities of the Audit Committee and its obligations to report to the Board. | |
| The charter sets out the powers of the Audit Committee, the meeting procedure | |
| framework, the process for selection of external auditors and audit planning. | |
| The Audit Committee charter can be found in Schedule 2 of the Corporate | |
| Governance Charter on the Responsible Entity’s website. |
12
-
4.2 The Board has received a declaration from the Managing Director and the Chief Operating Officer that, in their opinion:
-
the financial records of the Fund have been properly maintained in accordance with section 286; and
-
that the financial statements and notes referred to in paragraph 295(3)(b) for the financial year comply with the accounting standards; and
-
the financial statements and notes give a true and fair view of the financial position and performance of the entity; and
-
that the opinion has been formed on the basis of a sound system of risk management and internal control which is operating effectively.
-
4.3 As an externally managed scheme, recommendation 4.3 does not apply to the Fund. The Fund has not held an Annual General Meeting during the Statement Period.
==> picture [176 x 10] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Rural Funds Group Annual Report 2016
----- End of picture text -----
==> picture [10 x 7] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
13
----- End of picture text -----
PRINCIPLE 5:
Make timely and balanced disclosure
A listed entity should make timely and balanced disclosure of all matters concerning it that a reasonable person would expect to have a material effect on the price or value of its securities.
==> picture [441 x 44] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
ASX
RECOMMENDATION FUND’S RESPONSE
----- End of picture text -----
| 5.1 | The Responsible Entity has adopted a Continuous Disclosure Policy that applies |
|---|---|
| to all directors and employees of the Responsible Entity. The policy is available | |
| on the Responsible Entity’s website. | |
| The policy refects the desire to promote a fair market in the Fund’s units, honest | |
| management and timely, full and fair disclosure. It complies with the disclosure | |
| requirements of the ASX and explains the Fund’s disclosure obligations, the | |
| types of information that need to be disclosed, and identifes who is responsible | |
| for disclosure, and explains how employees of the Responsible Entity can | |
| contribute. | |
| The policy underlines the Board’s commitment to ensuring that unitholders are | |
| provided with accurate and timely information about the Fund’s activities. |
14
Rural Funds Group Annual Report 2016 15
PRINCIPLE 6: Respect the rights of security holders
A listed entity should respect the rights of its security holders by providing them with appropriate information and facilities to allow them to exercise those rights effectively.
ASX RECOMMENDATION FUND’S RESPONSE
6.1 The Responsible Entity is a boutique fund and asset manager specialising in the rural property sector. The Responsible Entity was established in 1997 to provide retail investors with an opportunity to invest in Australian rural assets.
The management team includes specialist fund managers, finance professionals, horticulturists, livestock managers and agronomists. This team provides the Responsible Entity with the specialised skills and experience required to manage the agricultural assets.
The Responsible Entity also utilises the best available consultants and supporting resources to achieve desired outcomes and has a substantial network available to ensure that, where appropriate, tasks can be outsourced.
The Responsible Entity has the primary responsibility for managing the Fund on behalf of unitholders.
Information about the Responsible Entity and the Fund is available on the Responsible Entity’s website.
Information about the corporate governance practices and policies of the Responsible Entity is available on the Responsible Entity’s website.
16
6.2 The Responsible Entity’s website has information available to unitholders to facilitate two-way communication. The investment products tab on the website provides a link to the Fund’s website which provides a Fund overview, sector, asset and lease information, strategy and investment process, financial information, key documents, news and announcements and details about how to contact the Responsible Entity and the Registry.
In addition, unitholders are encouraged to contact the Responsible Entity using any of the following methods:
Email: [email protected]
Website: http://www.ruralfunds.com.au/contact/ Phone: 1800 026 665 Fax: 1800 625 518 By visiting the Responsible Entity’s office: Level 2, 2 King St, Deakin ACT 2600
From time to time, the Responsible Entity arranges tours of the assets of the Fund. Unitholders are invited to attend these tours. Additionally, unitholders are welcome to make their own arrangements to visit the assets by contacting investor services by any of the methods mentioned above.
6.3 As an externally managed scheme that does not hold periodic meetings, recommendation 6.3 does not apply to the Fund. However, if the Responsible Entity was required to hold a Unitholder meeting, it could use a web-conferencing and/or teleconferencing facility for remote Unitholders along with an online polling system provided by the Registry, enabling Unitholders to vote online at any meeting.
6.4 The Responsible Entity encourages all investors to communicate with it and with the Fund’s Registry (Boardroom Pty Limited) electronically; however, the Responsible Entity continues to communicate with any investor via traditional methods (mail and phone) when appropriate.
17
Rural Funds Group Annual Report 2016
PRINCIPLE 7:
Recognise and manage risk
A listed entity should establish a sound risk management framework and periodically review the effectiveness of that framework.
==> picture [441 x 44] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
ASX
RECOMMENDATION FUND’S RESPONSE
----- End of picture text -----
| 7.1 | The Responsible Entity has not established a risk committee. Due to the size |
|---|---|
| of the Board and the nature of the business, the Board has determined that | |
| risk oversight should be managed by the full Board. The Board has ultimate | |
| responsibility for overseeing the risk management framework and for approving | |
| and monitoring compliance with the framework. The Board receives monthly | |
| reports on all material business risks in relation to the Fund, including a report | |
| on all risks rated extreme or high. The ongoing management of identifed risks is | |
| undertaken by the relevant executive and/or asset managers of each business | |
| area, who report to the Board on the effectiveness of control measures. | |
| The Responsible Entity has established a Risk Management Policy based on | |
| standards set out in the Australian/New Zealand Standard ISO 31000:2009, | |
| which documents the Responsible Entity’s policy for the oversight and | |
| management of material business risks. The Risk Management Policy ensures | |
| that risks are identifed and assessed, and that measures to monitor and manage | |
| each of the material risks are implemented. | |
| The Risk Management Policy is available on the Responsible Entity’s website. | |
| 7.2 | The Responsible Entity’s risk management framework is reviewed annually or |
| more often if there has been a change in the relevant legislation or in business | |
| requirements. An annual risk review was performed during the Statement Period. | |
| The annual risk review requires each risk owner to review each risk and assess | |
| whether the existing risk rating is appropriate. This results in all risks being | |
| re-evaluated. In some cases, the risks may be re-rated and the residual risk | |
| amended depending on changes in the likelihood of the risk occurring, the | |
| consequence if the risk did occur, and the effectiveness of control measures in | |
| place. |
18
7.3 The Responsible Entity has an internal compliance committee that provides assistance to the Board in evaluating the risk management framework and material business risks on an ongoing basis. Whilst not an internal audit committee, this committee reports to the Board quarterly and may make recommendations to the Board for changes to processes and systems to ensure compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.
The Internal Compliance Committee was comprised of:
-
Executive Manager Funds Management
-
Manager Corporate Services
-
Financial Controller
-
Client Services Manager (until 10 February 2016)
-
Client Services Supervisor (from 10 February 2016)
-
Compliance Officer
-
Business Manager – Rural Funds Group, Almond and Macadamia Projects (invitee)
-
Business Manager – StockBank, RFM Poultry and Cattle JV (invitee)
This broad representation of roles on the committee ensures the committee is fully informed of matters, and there is sufficient skills and experience among its members to make decisions as necessary.
==> picture [176 x 10] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Rural Funds Group Annual Report 2016
----- End of picture text -----
==> picture [10 x 7] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
19
----- End of picture text -----
- 7.4 The Responsible Entity is committed to undertaking the Fund’s business activities in a responsible and ethical manner and ensuring that it remains sustainable. Environmental, social and governance issues are embedded in many of our policies and procedures and are considered when making investment decisions.
The nature of the Fund is such that its activities, such as the leasing of agricultural land and infrastructure, are largely passive in nature. Lessees are required to adopt practices which retain the environmental integrity of the Fund’s properties.
The table below identifies material risk exposures, some of which fall into more than one category:
==> picture [325 x 35] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Risk type Identified risk
----- End of picture text -----
| Economic | •Counterpart lease default |
|---|---|
| •Contracts management | |
| •Interest rate risk, hedging and gearing | |
| •Business Strategy | |
| •Reduction in water entitlements | |
| •Suspension events | |
| •Future distributions or reduction in distributions | |
| •Fund performance | |
| •Competition | |
| •Failure to make acquisitions | |
| •Asset Valuations | |
| •Insurance | |
| •Changes in political and regulatory environment | |
| including taxation changes | |
| •Changes in economic conditions | |
| •Confict of interest and related party transactions | |
| •Infation | |
| •Reliance on RFM skills | |
| •Property illiquidity | |
| •Lack of liquidity | |
| •Litigation | |
| •Takeover | |
| Environmental | •Destruction or damage of property |
| •Reduction in water entitlements | |
| •Climate change | |
| Social | •Litigation |
| •Reputation |
The Responsible Entity manages the above risks in accordance with its Risk Management Policy available on the Responsible Entity’s website.
20
PRINCIPLE 8:
Remunerate fairly and responsibly
An externally managed listed entity should clearly disclose the terms governing the remuneration of the Responsible Entity.
==> picture [441 x 44] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
ASX
RECOMMENDATION FUND’S RESPONSE
----- End of picture text -----
| 8.1 | The Responsible Entity has adopted the ASX’s alternative recommendations |
|---|---|
| for externally managed entities and provides the following details governing the | |
| remuneration to the Responsible Manager: | |
| •Fund Management Fee – up to 1.0% p.a. of the gross asset value of the Fund | |
| •Asset Management Fee – up to 1.0% p.a. of the gross asset value of | |
| the Fund | |
| •Termination Fee – 1.5% of the gross asset value of the Fund. | |
| The fees listed above represent the maximum allowed under the Fund’s | |
| Constitution. | |
| At present the Responsible Entity charges total fees (fund management and | |
| asset management fees) of 1.05% of the gross asset value of the Fund. | |
| 8.2 | Refer to 8.1 |
| 8.3 | Refer to 8.1 |
21
Rural Funds Group Annual Report 2016
ASX additional information
Additional information required by the ASX Limited Listing Rules and not disclosed elsewhere in this report is set out below. This information is effective as at 11 August 2016.
(a) Distribution of Equity Securities
==> picture [441 x 34] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
HOLDING SIZE UNITHOLDERS CLASS
----- End of picture text -----
| 1 – 1,000 | 336 | Ordinary fully stapled securities |
|---|---|---|
| 1,001 – 5,000 | 829 | Ordinary fully stapled securities |
| 5,001 – 10,000 | 784 | Ordinary fully stapled securities |
| 10,001 – 100,000 | 2,476 | Ordinary fully stapled securities |
| 100,001 and over | 187 | Ordinary fully stapled securities |
(b) Substantial unitholders
The number of substantial unitholders and their associates are set out below:
| UNITHOLDER | NUMBER OF UNITS | % |
|---|---|---|
| J P Morgan Nominees Australia Limited | 30,975,444 | 14.969% |
| Netwealth Investments Limited | 14,153,320 | 6.840% |
(c) Holders of less than marketable parcels
The number of holders of less than marketable parcels, being $500 based on the ASX unit closing price of $1.655 as at 11 August 2016 is set out below:
| NUMBER | OF | UNITHOLDERS NUMBER |
OF | UNITS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 117 | 3,622 |
(d) Voting rights
The voting rights attaching to the ordinary units, set out in Section 253C of the Corporations Act 2001, are:
-
i. on a show of hands, each member of a registered scheme has 1 vote; and
-
ii. on a poll, each member of the scheme has 1 vote for each dollar of the value of the total interests they have in the scheme.
22
(e) Twenty largest unitholders at 11 August 2016
==> picture [441 x 34] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
UNITHOLDER NUMBER OF UNITS %
----- End of picture text -----
| J P Morgan Nominees Australia Limited | 30,975,444 | 14.969% |
|---|---|---|
| Netwealth investments Limited | 14,153,320 | 6.840% |
| Citicorp Nominees Pty Ltd | 7,916,946 | 3.826% |
| HSBC Custody Nominees (Australia) Limited | 7,654,574 | 3.699% |
| Rural Funds Management Ltd | 7,062,888 | 3.413% |
| Netwealth Investments Limited | 4,548,532 | 2.198% |
| Argo Investments Limited | 4,237,729 | 2.048% |
| Myer Family Investments P/L | 2,670,110 | 1.290% |
| National Nominees Limited | 2,277,603 | 1.101% |
| Bryant Family Services Pty Ltd | 2,151,404 | 1.040% |
| Bond Street Custodians Ltd | 1,791,958 | 0.866% |
| BNP Paribas Noms Pty Ltd | 1,636,776 | 0.791% |
| CS Fourth Nominees Pty Limited | 958,096 | 0.463% |
| WF Super Pty Ltd | 892,566 | 0.431% |
| One Managed Investment Funds Limited | 700,000 | 0.338% |
| Folkestone Maxim A-Reit Securities A/C Level 11 | ||
| Boskenna Pty Ltd | 666,570 | 0.322% |
| Citicorp Nominees Pty Limited | 647,365 | 0.313% |
| Karen Mitchell Nominees P/L | 589,784 | 0.285% |
| Avanteos Investments Limited <1259738 Parsons A/C> | 585,000 | 0.283% |
| SCA Ft Pty Ltd | 550,915 | 0.266% |
(f) On-market buy-back
As at 11 August 2016, RFF confirms there is no on-market buy-back facility in operation.
Securities exchange
The Trust is listed on ASX Limited (ASX). ASX reserves the right (but without limiting its absolute discretion) to remove Rural Funds Trust (RFT), or RF Active (RFA) from the official list if any of their securities cease to be “stapled” together, or any securities are issued by RFA which are not stapled to equivalent securities in RFT, or any securities are issued by RFT which are not stapled to equivalent securities in RFA.
23
Rural Funds Group Annual Report 2016
Financial statements for the year ended 30 June 2016
Rural Funds Group (ASX: RFF) stapled group comprising: Rural Funds Trust ARSN 112 951 578 and RF Active ARSN 168 740 805 Responsible Entity: Rural Funds Management Limited ACN 077 492 838 AFSL 226701
24
Rural Funds Group
Corporate Directory
| Registered Office | Level 2, 2 King Street |
|---|---|
| DEAKIN ACT 2600 | |
| Responsible Entity | Rural Funds Management Limited |
| ABN 65 077 492 838 | |
| AFSL 226701 | |
| Level 2, 2 King Street | |
| DEAKIN ACT 2600 | |
| Ph: 1800 026 665 | |
| Directors | Guy Paynter |
| David Bryant | |
| Michael Carroll | |
| Company Secretaries | Andrea Lemmon |
| Stuart Waight | |
| Custodian | Australian Executor Trustees Limited |
| ABN 84 007 869 794 | |
| Level 22, 207 Kent Street | |
| SYDNEY NSW 2000 | |
| Auditors | PricewaterhouseCoopers |
| Darling Park | |
| 201 Sussex Street | |
| SYDNEY NSW 2000 | |
| Share Registry | Boardroom Pty Limited |
| Level 12, 225 George Street | |
| SYDNEY NSW 2000 | |
| Ph: 1300 737 760 | |
| Bankers | Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (ANZ) |
| 242 Pitt Street | |
| SYDNEY NSW 2000 | |
| Stock Exchange Listing | Rural Funds Group units (Rural Funds Trust and RF Active form a |
| stapled investment vehicle) are listed on the Australian Securities | |
| Exchange (ASX) | |
| ASX Code | RFF |
25
Rural Funds Group Annual Report 2016
Rural Funds Group
Directors’ Report
30 June 2016
Rural Funds Group (RFF or the Group) comprises the stapled units in two Trusts, Rural Funds Trust (RFT) (ARSN 112 951 578) and RF Active (RFA) (ARSN 168 740 805) (collectively, the Trusts). The Directors of Rural Funds Management Limited (RFM) (ACN 077 492 838, AFSL 226701), the responsible entity of Rural Funds Group present their report on the Group for the year ended 30 June 2016.
In accordance with AASB 3 Business Combinations , the stapling arrangement referred to above is regarded as a business combination and Rural Funds Trust has been identified as the parent for the purpose of preparing the consolidated financial report.
The Directors’ report is a combined report that covers both Trusts. The financial information for the Group is taken from the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes.
Directors
The following persons held office as Directors of the responsible entity during the year and up to the date of this report:
Guy Paynter Non-Executive Chairman David Bryant Managing Director Michael Carroll Non-Executive Director
Principal activities and significant changes in nature of activities
The principal activity of the Group during the year was the leasing of agricultural properties and equipment. The Group is a lessor of agricultural property with revenue derived from leasing almond orchards, macadamia orchards, poultry property and infrastructure, vineyards, agricultural plant and equipment, and water rights.
The following activities of the Group changed during the year:
-
The Group purchased the Kerarbury and Kamelda properties (collectively referred to as Kerarbury), located near Darlington Point, NSW, to develop a 2,500 hectare almond orchard (including an additional 1,000 hectares announced in July 2016) to be leased by Olam Orchards Australia Pty Limited (Olam);
-
Through the acquisition of three macadamia orchards near Bundaberg, QLD, the Group has taken its first measured step into this industry; and,
-
The Group invested $5,275,000 in Perth Markets Limited (PML), the owner of the Market City site near Canning Vale, WA.
Operating results
The consolidated net profit after income tax of the Group for the year ended 30 June 2016 amounted to $34,788,000 (2015: $10,153,000).
The Group holds investment property, biological assets and derivatives at fair value. After adjusting for the effects of fair value adjustments, depreciation, impairments and one-off transaction costs during the year the profit before tax would have been $14,342,000 (2015: $11,014,000).
26
Rural Funds Group
Directors’ Report
30 June 2016
Adjusted funds from operations (AFFO)
| Adjusted funds from operations (AFFO) | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2015 | |
| $'000 | $'000 | |
| Net profit before income tax | 35,963 | 9,441 |
| Change in fair value of investment property | (3,343) | 4,824 |
| Change in fair value of biological assets | (26,495) | (1,835) |
| Change in fair value of interest rate swaps | 7,116 | 734 |
| Reversal of impairment of intangible assets | - | (2,645) |
| Depreciation and impairments | 939 | 490 |
| (Gain)/loss on sale of assets | (290) | 5 |
| One-off transaction costs | 452 | - |
| AFFO | 14,342 | 11,014 |
| AFFO centsper unit | 9.26 | 9.09 |
Having eliminated fair value adjustments and one-off transaction costs, the adjusted funds from operations (AFFO) effectively represents funds from operations from the property rental business.
Financial position
The net assets of the consolidated Group have increased to $207,864,000 at 30 June 2016 from $151,940,000 at 30 June 2015.
At 30 June 2016 the Group had total assets of $379,039,000 (2015: $252,663,000).
At 30 June 2016, the Group held total water entitlements (including investments in Barossa Infrastructure Limited (BIL) and Coleambally Irrigation Co-operative Limited (CICL)) at a book value of $69,534,000 (2015: $29,485,000). Independent valuations as at 30 June 2016 were received on the established almond orchards and associated properties and poultry property and infrastructure that attribute a value to the water entitlements held by the Group. The Directors consider that these valuations remain reasonable estimates of the fair value at 30 June 2016 and on this basis the fair value of water entitlements at 30 June 2016 was $97,949,000 (2015: $39,060,000). The value of water entitlements is illustrated in the table below:
| 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|
| $'000 | $'000 | |
| Intangible assets (water entitlements) | 59,691 | 28,965 |
| Investment in BIL | 509 | 520 |
| Investment in CICL | 9,334 | - |
| Total book value of water entitlements | 69,534 | 29,485 |
| Revaluation of intangible assetsper valuation | 28,415 | 9,575 |
| Adjusted total water entitlements | 97,949 | 39,060 |
Adjusted net asset value
The following depicts the net assets of the Group following the revaluation of intangible assets per these valuations.
| 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|
| $'000 | $'000 | |
| Net assets per Consolidated Statement of Financial Position | 207,864 | 151,940 |
| Revaluation of intangible assetsper valuation | 28,415 | 9,575 |
| Adjusted net assets | 236,279 | 161,515 |
| Adjusted NAVper unit | 1.43 | 1.22 |
27
Rural Funds Group Annual Report 2016
Rural Funds Group
Directors’ Report
30 June 2016
Significant changes in state of affairs
On 9 October 2015 the Group acquired Kerarbury, located near Darlington Point, NSW. In September 2015 a lease for 22 years and 9 months was executed with Olam to develop an initial 1,500 hectare almond orchard on Kerarbury. To fund this development, a placement of $12,596,000 (11.451 million fully paid stapled securities) and a non-renounceable rights issue of $22,381,000 (2 new units for every 13 existing units) were completed in October 2015.
On 15 March 2016 the Group acquired three macadamia orchards located near Bundaberg, QLD. Two of these properties are leased to the 2007 Macgrove Project (M07 or the Project) and the third property is leased to RFM. RFM was appointed responsible entity of M07 at a Grower’s meeting in February 2016. The Group leases a total of 259 hectares of planted area: 234 hectares to the Project and 25 hectares to RFM.
In January 2016 RFF invested $5,275,000 in Perth Markets Limited (PML). PML owns the Market City site located at Canning Vale, WA. PML is an industry-based consortium of wholesalers, growers, Market City tenants and statebased market operators. RFF’s investment represents an interest of approximately 8.96% in PML.
In the opinion of the Directors, there were no other significant changes in the state of affairs of the Group during the year.
Property leasing
At 30 June 2016 the Group held 31 properties as follows:
-
17 poultry farms (303,216 square metres);
-
3 almond orchards (2,414 planted hectares);
-
1 almond orchard under development (2,500 planted hectares at completion);
-
7 vineyards (666 planted hectares);
-
3 macadamia orchards (259 planted hectares).
During the year ended 30 June 2016, the properties held by the Group recorded a fair value of investment properties increment of $3,343,000 (2015: $4,824,000 decrement) and a change in fair value of biological assets increment of $26,495,000 (2015: $1,835,000).
Almond orchards
Established almond orchards and associated water licences are located near Hillston, NSW and are leased to tenants who make regular rental payments. On these properties, 2,414 hectares (2015: 1,814 hectares) are applied to almond growing: 1,006 hectares (2015: 1,006) at Yilgah, 808 hectares (2015: 808) at Mooral and 600 hectares at Tocabil (2015: nil). The full almond area is under lease to the following tenants:
-
Select Harvests Limited (SHV) 1,221 hectares (2015: 1,221);
-
RFM Almond Fund 2006 (AF06) 272 hectares (2015: 272);
-
RFM Almond Fund 2007 (AF07) 73 hectares (2015: 73);
-
RFM Almond Fund 2008 (AF08) 206 hectares (2015: 206);
-
Olam Orchards Australia Pty Limited (Olam) 600 hectares (2015: nil);
-
Rural Funds Management Limited (RFM) 42 hectares (2015: 42).
The Group underwent a rent review for the properties leased to Select Harvests Limited during the year. The rent review is effective from 1 July 2016.
The Group had two almond orchards under development during the year, both of which are under lease to Olam. Tocabil was leased to Olam in March 2015. As stated above, the full 600 hectares of almond orchard at Tocabil is now established and fully leased. The Kerarbury property was leased to Olam from September 2015. A 2,500 hectare almond orchard is being developed in accordance with the lease of this property, including an additional 1,000 hectares announced in July 2016.
28
Rural Funds Group
Directors’ Report
30 June 2016
Property leasing (continued)
Almond orchards (continued)
For its almond orchards the Group owns water entitlements of 59,985ML (2015: 33,219ML). During the year, a total of 26,766ML of water entitlements were purchased. Deposits were paid for an additional 6,591 ML of water entitlements.
For its almond orchards the Group also owns 21,430ML of delivery entitlements (2015: nil).
Poultry property
The poultry property and infrastructure held by the Group includes 17 poultry growing farms located in Griffith, NSW and Lethbridge, VIC and 1,432ML of water entitlements (2015: 1,432ML). Leases are in place with RFM Poultry, a scheme managed by RFM, for 100% (2015: 100%) of the poultry property and infrastructure, with remaining lease terms between 8 and 20 years. The poultry growing operations are performed by RFM Poultry.
Vineyards
The vineyard properties held by the Group include seven vineyards, with six located in South Australia, in the Barossa Valley, Adelaide Hills and Coonawarra regions, and one located in the Grampians in Victoria. For its vineyards, the Group owns 936ML of water entitlements (2015: 936ML). All vineyards produce premium quality grapes and are leased to Treasury Wine Estates Limited until June 2022.
Macadamia orchards
Established macadamia orchards and associated water licences were acquired during the year and are located near Bundaberg, QLD. Orchards are leased to tenants who make regular rental payments. On these properties, 259 hectares are applied to macadamia growing: 130 hectares at Swan Ridge, 104 hectares at Moore Park and 25 hectares at Bonmac. The full planted area is under lease to the following tenants:
-
2007 Macgrove Project (M07) 234 hectares;
-
Rural Funds Management Limited (RFM) 25 hectares.
Other activities
The Group owns a 33.50% stake in RFM StockBank (2015: 33.52%), a scheme managed by RFM, which operates a livestock leasing business. Under the livestock leasing operation, RFM StockBank retains ownership of the livestock and leases them to farmers in return for a placement fee which is similar to interest, and an upfront fee from the livestock agent. RFM, as responsible entity for RFM StockBank, has commenced the process of returning capital to investors and winding up the business.
Agricultural plant and equipment with a net book value of $4,178,000 (2015: $3,153,000) is owned by the Group and leased to AF06, AF07, AF08 and M07.
The Group owns a 8.96% interest in Perth Markets Limited, a stapled entity which owns the Market City site in Canning Vale, WA.
Banking facilities
At 30 June 2016 the core debt facility available to the Group was $147,500,000 (2015: $103,000,000), with a drawn down balance of $146,500,000 (2015: $89,650,000). The facility limit was increased to $200,000,000 on 12 July 2016. The facility expiry is unchanged (being December 2018), and at 30 June 2016 RFF had active interest rate swaps totalling 60% (2015: 84%) of the drawn down balance to manage interest rate risk.
29
Rural Funds Group Annual Report 2016
Rural Funds Group
Directors’ Report
30 June 2016
Distributions
| Distributions | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cents | Total | |
| per unit | $ | |
| Distribution declared 1 June 2015, paid 30 July 2015 | 2.1475 | 2,837,755 |
| Distribution paid 30 October 2015 | 2.2325 | 2,955,482 |
| Distribution paid 29 January 2016 | 2.2325 | 3,670,193 |
| Distribution paid 29 April 2016 | 2.2325 | 3,681,201 |
| Distribution declared 1 June 2016, paid 29 July 2016 | 2.2325 | 3,691,602 |
| Earnings per unit | ||
| Net profit after income tax for the year ($) | 34,788,000 | |
| Weighted average number of units on issue during the year | 154,854,317 | |
| Basic and diluted earnings per unit (total) (cents) | 22.46 |
Indirect cost ratio
The indirect cost ratio (ICR) is the ratio of the Group’s management costs over the Group’s average net assets for the year, expressed as a percentage.
Management costs include management fees and reimbursement of other expenses in relation to the Group, but do not include transactional and operational costs such as brokerage. Management costs are not paid directly by the unitholders of the Group.
The ICR for the Group for the year ended 30 June 2016 is 2.43% (2015: 2.42%). The ICR for the year has been impacted by costs associated with the placement and rights issue completed in October 2015.
Matters subsequent to the end of the year
In July 2016 the Group successfully completed a non-renounceable rights issue of $61,000,000 (1 new unit for every 4 existing units), in order to fund the acquisitions of the macadamia orchards and cattle properties and expansions to the almond development at Kerarbury by a further 1,000 hectares.
In July 2016 the Group negotiated an increase to its debt facility from $147,500,000 to $200,000,000.
In July and August 2016 the Group acquired three cattle properties: Rewan, a 17,500 hectare cattle property near Rolleston, QLD and Oakland Park and Mutton Hole, located near the Gulf of Carpentaria in far north Queensland and comprising a combined area of 225,800 hectares. The acquisition of the three cattle properties and associated livestock will increase the Group’s total assets by approximately $50,000,000. The properties and livestock will be leased for ten years to Cattle JV Pty Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of RFM.
No other matter or circumstance has arisen since the end of the year that has significantly affected or could significantly affect the operations of the Group, the results of those operations or the state of affairs of the Group in future financial years.
Likely developments and expected results of operations
The Group expects to continue to derive its core future income from the holding and leasing of investment property, biological assets and water entitlements. Management is continually looking for growth opportunities in agricultural and related industries.
30
Rural Funds Group
Directors’ Report
30 June 2016
Environmental regulation
The operations of the Group are subject to significant environmental regulations under the laws of the Commonwealth and States or Territories of Australia. Water usage for irrigation, domestic and levee purposes, including containing irrigation water from entering the river, water course or water aquifer are regulated by the Water Management Act 2000 . Water licences are leased to external parties who are then responsible to meet the legislative requirements of these licences. There have been no known significant breaches of any environmental requirements applicable to the Group.
Units on issue
165,357,290 units in Rural Funds Trust were on issue at 30 June 2016 (2015: 132,142,235). During the year 33,215,055 units were issued by the Trust (2015: 15,043,076) and nil (2015: nil) were redeemed.
165,357,290 units in RF Active were on issue at 30 June 2016 (2015: 132,142,235). During the year 33,215,055 units were issued by the Trust (2015: 15,043,076) and nil (2015: 50,000) were redeemed.
Indemnity of Responsible Entity and Custodian
In accordance with its constitution, Rural Funds Group indemnifies the Directors, Company Secretaries and all other officers of the responsible entity and Custodian when acting in those capacities, against costs and expenses incurred in defending certain proceedings.
Rounding of amounts
The Group is an entity to which ASIC Corporations (Rounding in Financial/Directors’ Reports) Instrument 2016/191 applies and accordingly amounts in the consolidated financial statements and directors' report have been rounded to the nearest thousand dollars.
31
Rural Funds Group Annual Report 2016
Rural Funds Group
Directors’ Report
30 June 2016
Information on Directors of the Responsible Entity
Guy Paynter Qualifications Experience
Special responsibilities
Non-Executive Chairman
Bachelor of Laws from The University of Melbourne
Guy Paynter is a former director of broking firm JB Were and brings to RFM more than 30 years of experience in corporate finance. Guy is a former member of the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) and a former associate of the Securities Institute of Australia (now known as the Financial Services Institute of Australasia). Guy is also Chairman of Bill Peach Group Limited (previously known as Aircruising Australia Limited). Guy's agricultural interests include cattle breeding in the Upper Hunter region in New South Wales.
Member of Audit Committee
Directorships held in other listed RFM Poultry entities during the three years prior to the current year
David Bryant Qualifications
Experience
Special responsibilities
Directorships held in other listed entities during the three years prior to the current year
Managing Director
Diploma of Financial Planning from the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology and a Masters of Agribusiness from The University of Melbourne. David Bryant established RFM in February 1997. Since then, David has led the RFM team that has acquired over $460 million in agricultural assets across eight Australian agricultural regions. This has included negotiating the acquisition of more than 35 properties and over 79,000 megalitres of water entitlements.
Managing Director
RFM Poultry
Michael Carroll
Qualifications
Experience
Special responsibilities
Directorships held in other listed entities during the three years prior to the current year
Non-Executive Director
Bachelor of Agricultural Science from La Trobe University and a Masters of Business Administration from The University of Melbourne's Melbourne Business School. Michael has completed the Advanced Management Program at Harvard Business School, Boston, and is a Fellow of the Australian Institute of Company Directors.
Michael Carroll serves a range of food and agricultural businesses in a board and advisory capacity. Michael is on the boards of Tassal Group Limited, Select Harvests Limited, Paraway Pastoral Company, Sunny Queen Pty Limited, and the Gardiner Dairy Foundation. Michael also has senior executive experience in a range of companies, including establishing and leading the National Australia Bank (NAB) Agribusiness division.
Chairman of Audit Committee
Michael is on the Board of Tassal Group Limited, RFM Poultry and Select Harvests Limited. Michael was on the Board of Warrnambool Cheese and Butter Limited from August 2009 until May 2014.
32
Rural Funds Group
Directors’ Report
30 June 2016
Interests of Directors of the Responsible Entity
| Interests of Directors of the Responsible Entity | ||
|---|---|---|
| Guy Paynter | David Bryant | |
| Units | Units | |
| Balance at 30 June 2014 | 351,833 | 3,287,372 |
| Additions | 30,323 | 368,819 |
| Balance at 30 June 2015 | 382,156 | 3,656,191 |
| Additions | 151,100 | 3,987,152 |
| Balance at 30 June 2016 | 533,256 | 7,643,343 |
Company Secretaries of the Responsible Entity
Stuart Waight and Andrea Lemmon are RFM’s joint company secretaries. Stuart joined RFM in 2003, is a Chartered Accountant and is RFM’s Chief Operating Officer. Andrea has been with RFM since 1997 and is RFM’s Executive Manager Funds Management.
Meetings of Directors of the Responsible Entity
During the financial year 16 meetings of Directors (including committees of Directors) were held. Attendances by each Director during the year were as follows:
| Directors | meetings | Audit Committee | meetings | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. eligible | No. attended | No. eligible | No. attended | |
| to attend | to attend | |||
| Guy Paynter | 16 | 14 | 2 | 2 |
| David Bryant | 16 | 15 | - | - |
| Michael Carroll | 16 | *15 | 2 | 2 |
- Michael Carroll excused himself from one meeting to avoid any potential conflict of interest.
PricewaterhouseCoopers attended the Board meeting where the Directors considered and approved the Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June 2016 as the audit committee was unable to form a quorum at that time.
Non-audit services
During the year ended 30 June 2016 fees of $6,121 (2015: nil) were paid or payable to PricewaterhouseCoopers for compliance audit services provided.
Auditor’s independence declaration
The auditor’s independence declaration in accordance with section 307C of the Corporations Act 2001 for the year ended 30 June 2016 has been received and is included on page 34 of the financial report.
The Directors’ report is signed in accordance with a resolution of the Board of Directors of Rural Funds Management Limited.
David Bryant Director
24 August 2016
33
Rural Funds Group Annual Report 2016
==> picture [66 x 50] intentionally omitted <==
Auditor’s Independence Declaration
As lead auditor for the audit of Rural Funds Group for the year ended 30 June 2016, I declare that to the best of my knowledge and belief, there have been:
-
no contraventions of the auditor independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 in relation to the audit; and
-
no contraventions of any applicable code of professional conduct in relation to the audit.
-
This declaration is in respect of Rural Funds Group and the entities it controlled during the period.
==> picture [125 x 56] intentionally omitted <==
David Ronald Partner PricewaterhouseCoopers
Sydney 24 August 2016
PricewaterhouseCoopers, ABN 52 780 433 757 Darling Park Tower 2, 201 Sussex Street, GPO BOX 2650, SYDNEY NSW 1171 T: +61 2 8266 0000, F: +61 2 8266 9999, www.pwc.com.au
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.
34
Rural Funds Group
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income
For the year ended 30 June 2016
| Note Revenue 6 Other income Management fees Professional fees Finance costs Other expenses Share of net profit - equity accounted investments Gain/(loss) on sale of assets Depreciation and impairments Change in fair value of biological assets Change in fair value of investment property Change in fair value of interest rate swaps Reversal of impairment of intangible assets |
2016 2015 $'000 $'000 26,549 22,218 76 69 (3,165) (2,496) (2,050) (2,253) (5,612) (5,285) (1,969) (1,364) 61 125 290 (5) (939) (490) 26,495 1,835 3,343 (4,824) (7,116) (734) - 2,645 |
|---|---|
| Net profit before income tax Income tax (expense)/benefit 7 |
35,963 9,441 (1,175) 712 |
| Net profit after income tax | 34,788 10,153 |
| Other comprehensive income: Revaluation (decrement)/increment 25 Income tax relating to these items 7 |
(14) 8 - - |
| Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax | (14) 8 |
| Total comprehensive income attributable to unitholders | 34,774 10,161 |
| Total comprehensive income for the year attributable to unitholders arising from: Rural Funds Trust RF Active (non-controlling interest) |
34,644 10,088 130 73 |
| 34,774 10,161 |
|
| Earnings per unit Basic and diluted earnings per unit from continuing operations: Per stapled unit (cents) 27 Per unit of Rural Funds Trust (cents) 27 Per unit of RF Active (cents) 27 |
22.46 8.38 22.38 8.32 0.08 0.06 |
The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements.
35
Rural Funds Group Annual Report 2016
Rural Funds Group
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position
As at 30 June 2016
| 2016 | 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Note | $'000 | $'000 | |
| ASSETS | |||
| Current assets | |||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 9 | 3,034 | 712 |
| Trade and other receivables | 10 | 7,239 | 2,729 |
| Other current assets | 14 | 2,501 | 307 |
| Total current assets | 12,774 | 3,748 | |
| Non-current assets | |||
| Investments accounted for using the equity method | 16 | 9,041 | 3,903 |
| Financial assets | 15 | 10,078 | 617 |
| Plant and equipment | 12 | 4,178 | 3,153 |
| Investment property | 13 | 168,951 | 142,379 |
| Biological assets | 11 | 113,206 | 67,581 |
| Intangible assets | 17 | 59,691 | 28,965 |
| Deferred tax assets | 22, 23 | 1,120 | 2,317 |
| Total non-current assets | 366,265 | 248,915 | |
| Total assets | 379,039 | 252,663 | |
| LIABILITIES | |||
| Current liabilities | |||
| Trade and other payables | 18 | 6,920 | 2,038 |
| Interest bearing liabilities | 19 | 3,030 | 657 |
| Income tax payable | 23 | - | 29 |
| Distributions payable | 26 | 3,901 | 2,947 |
| Total current liabilities | 13,851 | 5,671 | |
| Non-current liabilities | |||
| Interest bearing liabilities | 19 | 146,500 | 91,451 |
| Other non-current liabilities | 20 | 1,634 | 1,553 |
| Derivative financial liabilities | 21 | 9,190 | 2,048 |
| Total non-current liabilities | 157,324 | 95,052 | |
| Total liabilities(excluding net assets attributable to unitholders) | 171,175 | 100,723 | |
| Net assets attributable to unitholders | 207,864 | 151,940 | |
| Total liabilities | 379,039 | 252,663 |
The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements.
36
Rural Funds Group
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position
As at 30 June 2016
| 2016 | 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Note | $'000 | $'000 | |
| NET ASSETS ATTRIBUTABLE TO UNITHOLDERS | |||
| Unitholders of Rural Funds Trust | |||
| Issued units | 134,110 | 111,711 | |
| Asset revaluation reserve | 25 | 1,392 | 1,406 |
| Accumulated profit | 70,476 | 37,427 | |
| Parent entity interest | 205,978 | 150,544 | |
| Unitholders of RF Active | |||
| Issued units | 1,683 | 1,323 | |
| Accumulated profit | 203 | 73 | |
| Non-controlling interest | 1,886 | 1,396 | |
| Total net assets attributable to unitholders | 207,864 | 151,940 |
Water entitlements are held at cost in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position in accordance with accounting standards. Refer to note 5 for disclosure of the directors’ valuation of water entitlements, which are supported by independent property valuations.
The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements.
37
Rural Funds Group Annual Report 2016
Rural Funds Group
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Net Assets Attributable to Unitholders For the year ended 30 June 2016
| 2016 Note Issued units Retained earnings $'000 $'000 |
2016 Note Issued units Retained earnings $'000 $'000 |
Asset revaluation reserve $'000 |
Total Non- controlling interest $'000 $'000 |
Total Non- controlling interest $'000 $'000 |
Total $'000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance at 1 July 2015 111,711 37,427 Other comprehensive income - - |
1,406 (14) |
150,544 1,396 (14) - |
151,940 (14) |
||
| Total other comprehensive income - - |
(14) | (14) - |
(14) | ||
| Profit before income tax - Income tax expense 7 - |
35,912 (1,254) |
- - |
35,912 51 (1,254) 79 |
35,963 (1,175) |
|
| Total comprehensive income for the year - |
34,658 | (14) | 34,644 130 |
34,774 | |
| Issued units Units issued during the year 24 36,449 Issue costs 24 (1,661) |
- - |
- - |
36,449 368 (1,661) (8) |
36,817 (1,669) |
|
| Total issued units 34,788 |
- | - | 34,788 360 |
35,148 | |
| Distributions to unitholders 26 (12,389) |
(1,609) | - | (13,998) - |
(13,998) | |
| Balance at 30 June 2016 134,110 |
70,476 | 1,392 | 205,978 | 1,886 | 207,864 |
| 2015 Note Issued units Retained earnings Asset revaluation reserve $'000 $'000 $'000 |
Total Non- controlling interest $'000 $'000 |
Total $'000 |
|||
| Balance at 1 July 2014 108,281 27,792 1,398 Other comprehensive income - - 8 |
137,471 - 8 - |
137,471 8 |
|||
| Total other comprehensive income - - 8 |
8 - |
8 | |||
| Profit before income tax - 9,360 Income tax expense 7 - 720 - |
9,360 81 720 (8) |
9,441 712 |
|||
| Total comprehensive income for the year - 10,080 8 |
10,088 73 |
10,161 | |||
| Issued units Units issued during the year 24 14,447 - - Issue costs 24 (753) - - |
14,447 1,330 (753) (7) |
15,777 (760) |
|||
| Total issued units 13,694 - - |
13,694 1,323 |
15,017 | |||
| Distributions to unitholders 26 (10,264) (445) - |
(10,709) - |
(10,709) |
The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements.
38
Rural Funds Group
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
For the year ended 30 June 2016
| 2016 | 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Note | $'000 | $'000 | |
| Cash flows from operating activities | |||
| Receipts from customers | 29,255 | 24,539 | |
| Payments to suppliers | (9,492) | (9,988) | |
| Interest received | 80 | 21 | |
| Finance costs | (5,612) | (5,350) | |
| Net cash inflow from operating activities | 34 | 14,231 | 9,222 |
| Cash flows from investing activities | |||
| Payments for acquisition of macadamia leasing business | 31 | (7,291) | - |
| Acquired as a result of stapling transaction | - | 591 | |
| Payments for investment property | (23,275) | (9,095) | |
| Payments for biological assets | (13,606) | (240) | |
| Payments for intangible assets | (30,381) | (2,730) | |
| Payments for financial assets | (9,359) | - | |
| Payments for plant and equipment | (1,760) | (334) | |
| Payments for deposits | (2,242) | - | |
| Payments for equity accounted investments | (5,275) | - | |
| Proceeds from sale of investment property | 1,162 | - | |
| Proceeds from sale of assets | 348 | - | |
| Distributions from equity accounted investment | 16 | 234 | 132 |
| Distributions received | 11 | 113 | |
| Loans to related parties | - | 642 | |
| Net cash outflow from investing activities | (91,434) | (10,921) | |
| Cash flows from financing activities | |||
| Proceeds from issue of units | 35,148 | 15,017 | |
| Proceeds from borrowings | 58,079 | 3,585 | |
| Repayment of borrowings | (657) | (8,630) | |
| Distributions paid | (13,045) | (10,284) | |
| Net cash inflow from financing activities | 79,525 | (312) | |
| Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents held | 2,322 | (2,011) | |
| Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period | 712 | 2,723 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period | 9 | 3,034 | 712 |
The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements.
39
Rural Funds Group Annual Report 2016
Rural Funds Group
Notes to the Financial Statements
30 June 2016
1 General information
This financial report covers the consolidated financial statements and notes of Rural Funds Trust and its Controlled Entities including RF Active (Rural Funds Group, the Group or collectively the Trusts). Rural Funds Group is a for profit entity domiciled in Australia. The Directors of the Responsible Entity authorised the Financial Report for issue on 24 August 2016 and have the power to amend and reissue the Financial Report.
Items included in the financial statements of each of the Group entities are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates (functional currency). The consolidated financial statements are presented in Australian dollars which is the parent entity’s functional and presentation currency.
The separate financial statements and notes of the parent entity, Rural Funds Trust, have not been presented within this financial report as permitted by amendments made to the Corporations Act 2001 . Parent entity information is included in note 36.
2 Summary of significant accounting policies
Basis of preparation
The accounting policies that have been adopted in respect of the financial report are those of Rural Funds Management (RFM) as responsible entity of the Trusts.
The Trusts have common business objectives and operate as an economic entity collectively known as Rural Funds Group.
The financial statements are general purpose financial statements that have been prepared in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards, Australian Accounting Interpretations, and other authoritative pronouncements of the Australian Accounting Standards Board, the Corporations Act 2001 and the Trusts’ Constitution. The report has been prepared on a going concern basis.
The financial statements and notes comply with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. The significant accounting policies used in the preparation and presentation of these financial statements are provided below and are consistent with prior reporting periods unless otherwise stated. The financial statements are based on historical cost, except for the measurement at fair value of selected non-current assets, financial assets and financial liabilities.
As permitted by Class Order 05/642, issued by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission, these financial statements are consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes of both Rural Funds Trust and RF Active.
As permitted by Class Order 13/1644, which amends Class Order 13/1050, this financial report presents the Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes of the Rural Funds Group (being the consolidated financial statements and notes of the Group).
Principles of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the financial position and performance of controlled entities from the date on which control is obtained until the date that control is lost.
Intragroup assets, liabilities, equity, income, expenses and cash flows relating to transactions between entities in the consolidated Group have been eliminated in full for the purpose of these financial statements.
Appropriate adjustments have been made to the controlled entity’s financial position, performance and cash flows where the accounting policies used by that entity were different from those adopted by the consolidated entity. All controlled entities have a 30 June financial year end.
40
Rural Funds Group
Notes to the Financial Statements
30 June 2016
2 Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)
Principles of consolidation (continued)
Controlled entities
In accordance with AASB 3 Business Combinations , Rural Funds Trust is deemed to control RF Active from the stapling date of 16 October 2014. Rural Funds Trust is considered to be the acquirer of RF Active due to the size of the respective entities and as the stapling transaction and capitalisation of RF Active was funded by a distribution from Rural Funds Trust that was compulsorily used to subscribe for units in RF Active.
Associates
Associates are entities over which the Group has significant influence but not control or joint control, generally accompanying a holding of between 20% and 50% of the voting rights. Investments in associates are accounted for using the equity method of accounting, after initially being recognised at cost.
The Group's share of its associates’ post-acquisition profits or losses is recognised in profit or loss, and its share of post-acquisition other comprehensive income is recognised in other comprehensive income. The cumulative post-acquisition movements are adjusted against the carrying amount of the investment. Dividends or distributions receivable from associates are recognised as a reduction in the carrying amount of the investment.
Business combinations
Business combinations are accounted for by applying the acquisition method which requires an acquiring entity to be identified in all cases. The acquisition date under this method is the date that the acquiring entity obtains control over the acquired entity.
The fair value of identifiable assets and liabilities acquired are recognised in the consolidated financial statements at the acquisition date.
Goodwill or a discount on acquisition may arise on the acquisition date, this is calculated by comparing the fair value of the consideration transferred and the amount of non-controlling interest in the acquirer with the fair value of the net identifiable assets acquired. Where the consideration is greater than the identifiable assets, the excess is recorded as goodwill. Where the net assets acquired are greater than the consideration, the measurement basis of the net assets are reassessed and then a discount on acquisition recognised in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income.
All acquisition-related costs are recognised as expenses in the periods in which the costs are incurred
except for costs to issue debt or equity securities.
Any contingent consideration which forms part of the combination is recognised at fair value at the acquisition date. If the contingent consideration is classified as equity then it is not remeasured and the settlement is accounted for within equity. Otherwise subsequent changes in the value of the contingent consideration liability are measured through the statement of comprehensive income.
Comparative amounts
Comparatives amounts have not been restated unless otherwise noted.
41
Rural Funds Group Annual Report 2016
Rural Funds Group
Notes to the Financial Statements
30 June 2016
2 Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)
Revenue
Revenue is recognised when the amount of the revenue can be measured reliably, it is probable that economic benefits associated with the transaction will flow to the entity and specific criteria relating to the type of revenue as noted below, have been satisfied.
Revenue from the leasing of investment property, water rights, property, plant and equipment, infrastructure and biological assets, where the Group is a lessor, is recognised in income over the lease term on an accruals basis. The respective leased assets are included in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position based on that nature.
Interest revenue is recognised on an accruals basis taking into account the interest rates applicable to the financial assets.
All revenue is stated net of the amount of goods and services tax (GST).
Income tax
The charge for current income tax expense is based on the profit adjusted for any non-assessable or disallowed items. It is calculated using the tax rates that have been enacted or are substantially enacted by the balance sheet date.
Deferred tax is accounted for using the balance sheet method in respect of temporary differences arising between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the financial statements.
No deferred income tax will be recognised from the initial recognition of an asset or liability, excluding a business combination, where there is no effect on accounting or taxable profit or loss.
Deferred tax is calculated at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the period when the asset is realised or liability is settled. Deferred tax is charged/credited in the income statement except where it relates to items that may be credited directly to equity, in which case the deferred tax is adjusted directly against equity.
Deferred income tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that future tax profits will be available against which deductible temporary differences can be utilised.
The amount of benefits brought to account or which may be realised in the future is based on management’s judgement, the assumption that no adverse change will occur in income taxation legislation and the anticipation that the consolidated group will derive sufficient future assessable income to enable the benefit to be realised and comply with the conditions of deductibility imposed by the law.
Goods and services tax (GST)
Revenue, expenses and assets are recognised net of the amount of goods and services tax (GST), except where the amount of GST incurred is not recoverable from the Australian Taxation Office (ATO).
Receivables and payables are stated inclusive of GST.
The net amount of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the ATO is included as part of trade and other receivables or payables in the consolidated statement of financial position.
Cash flows in the consolidated statement of cash flows are included on a gross basis and the GST component of cash flows arising from investing and financing activities which is recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority is classified as operating cash flows.
42
Rural Funds Group
Notes to the Financial Statements
30 June 2016
2 Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents comprises cash on hand, demand deposits and short-term investments which are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and which are subject to an insignificant risk of change in value.
Bank overdrafts also form part of cash equivalents for the purpose of the consolidated statement of cash flows and are presented within current liabilities on the consolidated statement of financial position.
Trade and other receivables
Trade receivables are recognised initially at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost less an allowance for doubtful debts.
Collectability of trade receivables is reviewed on an ongoing basis. Individual impairment is identified at a counterparty specific level following objective evidence that a financial asset is impaired. This may be after an interest or principal payment is missed or when information comes to hand that would indicate an inability to meet repayments. An allowance for doubtful debts is established when there is objective evidence that the Group will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the original terms of receivables. The amount of the allowance is the difference between the asset's carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows, discounted at the originally assessed effective interest rate and taking into account the amount of security held. The amount of the allowance is recognised in the income statement.
Debts which are known to be uncollectible are written off when identified. Write-offs are charged against accounts previously established for impairment allowance or directly to the income statement.
Where the debt is in relation to amounts due on almond groves and the impact of non-payment would result in the cancellation of the almond grove rights, which would revert to the Group, then the impairment provision is measured against the value of the rights that would be obtained by the Group.
Intangible assets
Water rights
Permanent water rights and entitlements are recorded at historical cost less accumulated impairment losses. Such rights have an indefinite life, and are not depreciated. The carrying value is tested annually for impairment as well as for possible reversal of impairment. If events or changes in circumstances indicate impairment, or reversal of impairment, the carrying value is adjusted to take account of impairment losses.
Goodwill
Goodwill is carried at cost less accumulated impairment losses. Goodwill is calculated as the excess of the sum of:
-
the consideration transferred;
-
any non-controlling interest; and
-
the acquisition date fair value of any previously held equity interest; over the acquisition date fair value of net identifiable assets acquired.
43
Rural Funds Group Annual Report 2016
Rural Funds Group
Notes to the Financial Statements
30 June 2016
2 Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)
Financial instruments
Financial instruments are recognised initially using trade date accounting, i.e. on the date that the Group becomes party to the contractual provisions of the instrument.
On initial recognition, all financial instruments are measured at fair value plus transaction costs (except for instruments measured at fair value through profit or loss where transaction costs are expensed as incurred).
a. Financial assets
Financial assets are divided into the following categories which are described in detail below:
-
loans and receivables;
-
financial assets at fair value through profit or loss;
-
available-for-sale financial assets; and
-
held-to-maturity investments.
Financial assets are assigned to the different categories on initial recognition, depending on the characteristics of the instrument and its purpose. A financial instrument’s category is relevant to the way it is measured and whether any resulting income and expenses are recognised in profit or loss or in other comprehensive income.
All income and expenses relating to financial assets are recognised in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income in the ‘finance income’ or ‘finance costs’ line item respectively.
b. Loans and receivables
Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. They arise principally through the provision of goods and services to customers but also incorporate other types of contractual monetary assets.
After initial recognition these are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method, less provision for impairment. Any change in their value is recognised in profit or loss.
Discounting is omitted where the effect of discounting is considered immaterial.
Significant receivables are considered for impairment on an individual asset basis when they are past due at the reporting date and when objective evidence is received that a specific counterparty will default.
The amount of the impairment is the difference between the net carrying amount and the present value of the future expected cash flows associated with the impaired receivable.
For trade receivables, impairment provisions are recorded in a separate allowance account with the loss being recognised in profit or loss. When confirmation has been received that the amount is not collectable, the gross carrying value of the asset is written off against the associated impairment provision.
Subsequent recoveries of amounts previously written off are credited against other income in profit or loss.
In some circumstances, the Group renegotiates repayment terms with customers which may lead to changes in the timing of the payments, the Group does not necessarily consider the balance to be impaired, however assessment is made on a case-by-case basis.
44
Rural Funds Group
Notes to the Financial Statements
30 June 2016
2 Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)
Financial instruments (continued)
c. Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss include financial assets:
-
acquired principally for the purpose of selling in the near future;
-
designated by the entity to be carried at fair value through profit or loss upon initial recognition; or,
-
which are derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting.
The Group has some derivatives which are designated as financial assets at fair value through profit or loss.
Assets included within this category are carried in the consolidated statement of financial position at fair value with changes in fair value recognised in finance income or expenses in profit or loss.
Any gain or loss arising from derivative financial instruments is based on changes in fair value, which is determined by direct reference to active market transactions or using a valuation technique where no active market exists.
d. Available-for-sale financial assets
Available-for-sale financial assets are non-derivative financial assets that do not qualify for inclusion in any of the other categories of financial assets.
Purchases and sales of available-for-sale investments are recognised on settlement date.
All available-for-sale financial assets are measured at fair value, with subsequent changes in value recognised in other comprehensive income.
Gains and losses arising from financial instruments classified as available-for-sale are only recognised in profit or loss when they are sold or when the investment is impaired.
In the case of impairment or sale, any gain or loss previously recognised in equity is transferred to the profit or loss.
e. Held-to-maturity investments
The group classifies investments as held-to-maturity if:
-
they are non-derivative financial assets;
-
they are quoted in an active market;
-
they have fixed or determinable payments and fixed maturities; and,
-
the group intends to, and is able to, hold them to maturity.
Held-to-maturity financial assets are included in non-current assets, except for those with maturities of less than 12 months from the end of the reporting period, which would be classified as current assets.
45
Rural Funds Group Annual Report 2016
Rural Funds Group
Notes to the Financial Statements
30 June 2016
2 Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)
Financial instruments (continued)
f. Financial liabilities
Financial liabilities are recognised when the Group becomes a party to the contractual agreements of the instrument. All interest-related charges are reported in profit or loss are included in the income statement line items "finance costs" or "finance income".
Financial liabilities are classified as either financial liabilities ‘at fair value through profit or loss’ or other financial liabilities depending on the purpose for which the liability was acquired. Although the Group uses derivative financial instruments in economic hedges of interest rate risk, it does not hedge account for these transactions.
The Group‘s financial liabilities include borrowings and trade and other payables, which are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method.
All of the Group‘s derivative financial instruments that are not designated as hedging instruments in accordance with the strict conditions explained in AASB 139 are accounted for at fair value through profit or loss.
g. Impairment of financial assets
At the end of the reporting period the Group assesses whether there is any objective evidence that a financial asset or group of financial assets is impaired.
h. Financial assets at amortised cost
If there is objective evidence that an impairment loss on financial assets carried at amortised cost has been incurred, the amount of the loss is measured as the difference between the assets carrying amount and the present value of the estimated future cash flows discounted at the financial assets original effective interest rate.
Impairment on loans and receivables is reduced through the use of an allowance account, all other impairment losses on financial assets at amortised cost are taken directly to the asset.
Plant and equipment
Classes of plant and equipment are measured using the cost model as specified below.
The asset is carried at its cost less any accumulated depreciation and any impairment losses. Costs include purchase price, other directly attributable costs and the initial estimate of the costs of dismantling and restoring the asset, where applicable.
Subsequent costs are included in the asset’s carrying amount or recognised as a separate asset, as appropriate, only when it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the Group and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. The carrying amount of any component accounted for as a separate asset is derecognised when replaced. All other repairs and maintenance are charged to profit or loss during the reporting period in which they are incurred.
The depreciation rates used for each class of depreciable asset are shown below:
Fixed asset class Depreciation rate Capital works in progress Nil Plant and equipment 3-16 years Motor vehicles 6-16 years
46
Rural Funds Group
Notes to the Financial Statements
30 June 2016
2 Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)
Plant and equipment (continued)
At the end of each annual reporting period, the depreciation method, useful life and residual value of each asset is reviewed. Any revisions are accounted for prospectively as a change in estimate.
Gains and losses on disposals are determined by comparing proceeds with carrying amount. These are included in profit or loss. When revalued assets are sold, it is Group policy to transfer any amounts included in other reserves in respect of those assets to retained earnings.
Biological assets
In accordance with AASB 141 Agriculture , vines, almond and macadamia trees have been recognised at fair value, less costs to sell. Fair value is determined as follows:
-
up until the time when commercial yields are achieved, cost approximates fair value, less costs to sell;
-
thereafter based on the present value of expected net cash flows from the vineyards, almond orchards and macadamia orchards, discounted using a pre-tax market determined rate.
Changes in the fair value of biological assets are recognised in the income statement in the year they arise.
Investment property
Investment properties, comprise land, buildings and integral infrastructure including irrigation and trellising.
Investment properties are held for long-term rental yields and are not occupied by the Group. They are carried at fair value and changes in fair value are presented in the income statement.
Leases
Leases of fixed assets where substantially all the risks and benefits incidental to the ownership of the asset, but not the legal ownership that are transferred to entities in the Group are classified as finance leases.
Lease payments for operating leases, where substantially all of the risks and benefits have not been transferred from the lessor, are charged as expenses on a straight-line basis over the life of the lease term.
Lease incentives under operating leases are recognised as a liability and amortised on a straight-line basis over the life of the lease term.
Provisions
Provisions are recognised when the Group has a legal or constructive obligation, as a result of past events, for which it is probable that an outflow of economic benefits will result and that outflow can be reliably measured.
Provisions are measured at the present value of management's best estimate of the outflow required to settle the obligation at the end of the reporting period. The discount rate used is a pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the liability. The increase in the provision due to the unwinding of the discount is taken to finance costs in the income statement.
47
Rural Funds Group Annual Report 2016
Rural Funds Group
Notes to the Financial Statements
30 June 2016
2 Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)
Provisions (continued)
Provisions for distributions
Provision is made for the amount of any distribution declared, being appropriately authorised and no longer at the discretion of the Group, on or before the end of the reporting period but not distributed at the end of the reporting period.
Borrowing costs
Borrowing costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying asset are capitalised as part of the cost of that asset. All other borrowing costs are recognised as an expense in the period in which they are incurred.
Earnings per unit
Basic earnings per unit are calculated on net profit attributable to unitholders of the Group divided by the weighted average number of issued units.
Interest bearing liabilities
Interest bearing liabilities are initially recognised at fair value less any related transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition, interest bearing liabilities are stated at amortised cost. Any difference between cost and redemption value is recognised in the statement of comprehensive income over the entire period of the borrowings on an effective interest basis. Interest-bearing liabilities are classified as current liabilities unless the Group has an unconditional right to defer the settlement of the liability for at least twelve months from the balance sheet date.
Issued units
Ordinary units are classified as liabilities in accordance with AASB 132 Financial Instruments: Presentation . Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of ordinary units and unit options which vest immediately are recognised as a deduction from net assets attributable to unitholders, net of any tax effects. There is no equity relating to the Group.
Rounding of amounts
The Group is an entity to which ASIC Corporations (Rounding in Financial/Directors’ Reports) Instrument 2016/191 applies and accordingly amounts in the consolidated financial statements and directors' report have been rounded to the nearest thousand dollars.
Parent entity information
The financial information of the parent entity, Rural Funds Trust, disclosed in note 36 has been prepared on the same basis as the consolidated financial statements, except as set out below.
Investments in subsidiaries and associates
Investments in subsidiaries and associates are accounted for at historical cost less any accumulated impairment. Distributions received from equity investments are recognised in the parent entity’s profit or loss when its right to receive the distribution is established.
48
Rural Funds Group
Notes to the Financial Statements
30 June 2016
2 Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)
New accounting standards and interpretations
| Standard Name | Effective date for the Group |
Requirements | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| AASB 2014-6 Amendments to AASB 116 and AASB 141 for bearer plants |
1 Jan 2016 | Amends the accounting for bearer plants to now be the same as property, plant and equipment in AASB 116 Property, Plant and Equipment, because their operation is similar to that of manufacturing. |
Bearer plants held by the Group will no longer be treated as biological assets, and will be classified as property, plant and equipment. The Group will have the choice to hold the assets at either cost or fair value. Any revaluations held at fair value will be taken through comprehensive income rather than through profit and loss. |
| AASB 15 Revenue from contracts with customers |
1 Jan 2018 | Recognise contracted revenue when control of a good or service transfers to a customer. The notion of control replaces the existing notion of risks and rewards. |
It is not expected that this standard will have a material impact on the Group. |
| AASB 16 Leases | 1 Jan 2019 | Introduces a single lease accounting model and requires a lessee to recognise assets and liabilities for all leases with a term of more than 12 months. |
There is no impact on reported financial position or performance expected for the Group as it is a lessor in nature. |
There are no other standards that are not yet effective and that would be expected to have a material impact on the entity in the current or future reporting periods.
3 Significant accounting judgements, estimates and assumptions
The preparation of the financial statements requires management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts in the financial statements. Management continually evaluates its judgements, estimates and assumptions in relation to assets, liabilities, contingent liabilities, revenue and expenses. Management bases its judgements, estimates and assumptions on historical experience and on other various factors it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the result of which form the basis of the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions and may materially affect financial results or the financial position reported in future periods.
Management has identified the following critical accounting policies for which significant judgements, estimates or assumptions are made.
49
Rural Funds Group Annual Report 2016
Rural Funds Group
Notes to the Financial Statements
30 June 2016
3 Significant accounting judgements, estimates and assumptions (continued)
Valuations
Independent property valuations were obtained for established almond orchards and associated properties, from independent valuer, CBRE Valuations Pty Limited in June 2016. Independent property valuations were obtained for vineyard properties from independent valuer, Gaetjens Pickett Valuers in June 2016. Independent property valuations were obtained for macadamia orchards and associated properties from independent valuer, CBRE Valuations Pty Limited in June 2016.
Independent property valuations were obtained for poultry property and infrastructure from independent valuer, Opteon (Victoria) Pty Limited in June 2016. The Directors have adopted all of the valuations from the independent valuers with the exception of certain poultry assets, where the Directors determined a more conservative view was appropriate in line with assumptions applied with those assets.
Almond orchards and associated properties, including those under development, macadamia orchards and associated properties, poultry property and infrastructure and vineyard properties are valued at fair value excluding the value of water rights. Water rights are treated as intangible assets, which are held at historical cost less accumulated impairment losses.
The valuation model used judgement by using discount rates, capitalisation rates and comparable sales in calculating the values and allocating those values over investment property and biological assets.
Recognition of deferred tax assets
The recognition of deferred tax assets is based upon whether it is more likely than not that sufficient and suitable taxable profits will be available in the future against which the reversal of temporary differences can be deducted. To determine future taxable profits, reference is made to the latest available profit forecasts. Where the temporary differences are related to losses, relevant tax law is considered to determine the availability of the losses to offset against the future taxable profits.
Recognition therefore involves judgement regarding the future financial performance of the particular legal entity or tax group in which the deferred tax asset has been recognised. Historical differences between forecast and actual taxable profits have not resulted in material adjustments to the recognition of deferred tax assets.
Valuation of Barossa Infrastructure Limited and Coleambally Irrigation Co-operative Limited shares
The shares in Barossa Infrastructure Limited (BIL) and Coleambally Irrigation Co-operative Limited (CICL) have been valued using the number of megalitres of water that the Group is entitled to under the BIL and CICL schemes as supported by an external valuation on an 'in use' basis, or at initial cost. These methods are used due to a lack of evidence of trading in BIL and CICL shares.
4 Working capital
The deficiency in working capital at 30 June 2016 is due to the timing of distributions. Based on the forecast cash flows, the Group believes it can pay all of its debts as and when they fall due.
50
Rural Funds Group
Notes to the Financial Statements
30 June 2016
5 Segment information
The Group operates in one operating segment (2015: one segment), being the holding and leasing of agricultural property and equipment.
Water rights and entitlements
The Board reviews the business based on the internal and external valuations of its properties.
Permanent water rights and entitlements are held at historical cost less accumulated impairment losses. The book value of the water rights (including investments in BIL and CICL) at 30 June 2016 is $69,534,000 (2015: $29,485,000).
In June 2016 independent property valuations were performed by CBRE Valuations Pty Limited and Opteon (Victoria) Pty Limited on the almond and macadamia orchards, and associated properties and poultry property and infrastructure that attribute a value to the water entitlements held by the Group. The Directors consider that these valuations are reasonable estimates of the fair value at 30 June 2016. These valuations value the water rights at 30 June 2016 at $97,949,000 (2015: $39,060,000) representing a movement in the value of the water rights above cost of $28,415,000 (2015: $9,575,000).
The following is a comparison of the book value at 30 June 2016 to an adjusted value based on the Directors' valuation of the water rights.
| Per Statutory | Revaluation of | Adjusted | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consolidated | water | Consolidated | |
| Statement of | entitlements | Statement of | |
| Financial | per Directors' | Financial | |
| Position | valuation | Position | |
| $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | |
| Assets | |||
| Total current assets | 12,774 | - | 12,774 |
| Total non-current assets | 366,265 | 28,415 | 394,680 |
| Total assets | 379,039 | 28,415 | 407,454 |
| Liabilities | |||
| Total current liabilities | 13,851 | - | 13,851 |
| Total non-current liabilities | 157,324 | - | 157,324 |
| Total liabilities | 171,175 | - | 171,175 |
| Net assets | 207,864 | 28,415 | 236,279 |
| Net asset valueper unit($) | 1.26 | 0.17 | 1.43 |
51
Rural Funds Group Annual Report 2016
Rural Funds Group
Notes to the Financial Statements
30 June 2016
6 Revenue
| Revenue | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2015 | |
| $'000 | $'000 | |
| Rental revenue | 26,469 | 21,719 |
| Reimbursement of water charges | - | 212 |
| Temporary water sales | - | 182 |
| Interest received | 80 | 69 |
| Other revenue | - | 36 |
| Total | 26,549 | 22,218 |
7 Income tax expense
The major components of income tax expense comprise:
| 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|
| $'000 | $'000 | |
| Current tax | - | 29 |
| Deferred tax | 1,210 | (741) |
| Adjustments in respect of current income tax of previous years | (29) | - |
| Adjustments in respect of deferred income tax of previous years |
(6) | - |
| Income tax expense/(benefit) reported in the Statement of Comprehensive Income |
1,175 | (712) |
| Income tax expense is attributable to: | ||
| Profit from continuingoperations | 1,175 | (712) |
| Total | 1,175 | (712) |
| Deferred income tax expense/(benefit) included in income tax expense comprises: | ||
| Decrease in deferred tax assets | (2,586) | (932) |
| Decrease in deferred tax liabilities | 1,382 | 191 |
| Total | (1,204) | (741) |
| Numerical reconciliation of income tax expense to prima facie tax payable | ||
| 2016 | 2015 | |
| $'000 | $'000 | |
| Accounting profit before tax from continuing operations | 35,963 | 9,441 |
| At the statutory income tax rate of 30% (2015: 30%) | 10,789 | 2,832 |
| Tax effect of amounts that are not deductible/(taxable) in determining taxable income |
(9,520) | (1,948) |
| Previously unrecognised deferred tax asset now recognised | - | (1,596) |
| Adjustments in respect of tax of previous years | (35) | - |
| Imputation credits received | (59) | - |
| Total | 1,175 | (712) |
From 1 July 2014 both Rural Funds Trust and RFM Chicken Income Fund are flow through trusts for tax purposes. As a result, it is no longer probable that a lax liability will be incurred in these entities in relation to future sale of assets for a gain or through trading.
52
Rural Funds Group
Notes to the Financial Statements
30 June 2016
7 Income tax expense (continued)
Amounts recognised directly in equity
| 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|
| $'000 | $'000 | |
| Capitalised issue costs | (7) | - |
| Total | (7) | - |
Franking credits
At 30 June 2016 there are $59,000 of franking credits available to apply to future RF Active income distributions (2015: nil).
8 Remuneration of auditors
During the year the following fees were paid or payable for services provided by the auditor of the Group:
| 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|
| $ | $ | |
| PricewaterhouseCoopers Australia: | ||
| Audit and review of financial statements | 210,508 | 213,073 |
| Compliance audit | 6,121 | - |
| Total | 216,629 | 213,073 |
9 Cash and cash equivalents
| 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|
| $'000 | $'000 | |
| Cash at bank | 3,034 | 712 |
| Total | 3,034 | 712 |
Reconciliation of cash
Cash and cash equivalents reported in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows are reconciled to the equivalent items in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position as follows:
| Cash and cash equivalents | 3,034 | 712 |
|---|---|---|
| Trade and other receivables | ||
| 2016 | 2015 | |
| $'000 | $'000 | |
| Current | ||
| Trade receivables | 6,056 | 1,804 |
| Sundry receivables | 433 | 517 |
| Receivables from relatedparties | 750 | 408 |
| Total | 7,239 | 2,729 |
10 Trade and other receivables
Trade receivables are non-interest bearing and are generally on 30 day terms.
As at 30 June 2016, no trade receivables were past due but not impaired (2015: nil).
53
Rural Funds Group Annual Report 2016
Rural Funds Group
Notes to the Financial Statements
30 June 2016
11 Biological assets
| Biological assets | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Almond | Vines: | Macadamia | Total |
| trees: | fair value | trees: | ||
| fair value | fair value | |||
| $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | |
| Opening balance | 42,735 | 24,846 | - | 67,581 |
| Additions | 12,200 | - | 1,405 | 13,605 |
| Acquisitions | - | - | 5,525 | 5,525 |
| Fair value adjustment | 34,679 | (7,397) | (787) | 26,495 |
| Closing balance | 89,614 | 17,449 | 6,143 | 113,206 |
| 2015 | Almond | Vines: | Macadamia | Total |
| trees: | fair value | trees: | ||
| fair value | fair value | |||
| $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | |
| Opening balance | 41,426 | 24,080 | - | 65,506 |
| Additions | - | 240 | - | 240 |
| Fair value adjustment | 1,309 | 526 | - | 1,835 |
| Closing balance | 42,735 | 24,846 | - | 67,581 |
Biological assets include mature bearer assets of almond and macadamia trees and new almond tree developments. Mature and new almond trees are situated on properties near Hillston, NSW and Darlington Point, NSW. Mature macadamia trees are situated on properties near Bundaberg, QLD. The Group owns and maintains the trees for the purpose of leasing these assets to third parties. At 30 June 2016 the Group owned almond trees on 2,414 hectares of land (2015: 1,814 hectares) and macadamia trees on 259 hectares of land (2015: nil).
Biological assets also include grape vines located in South Australia and Victoria. The Group owns vines for the purposes of leasing to third parties. At 30 June 2016 the Group owned vines on 668 hectares of land (2015: 668 hectares).
The determination of the fair value of biological assets is discussed further at note 29.
54
Rural Funds Group
Notes to the Financial Statements
30 June 2016
12 Plant and equipment
| Plant and equipment | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Capital | Plant and | Motor | Total |
| works in | equipment | vehicles | ||
| progress | ||||
| $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | |
| Opening net book amount | 44 | 2,815 | 294 | 3,153 |
| Additions | 335 | 1,316 | 168 | 1,819 |
| Disposals | - | (52) | (6) | (58) |
| Depreciation and impairment | - | (665) | (71) | (736) |
| Closing net book amount | 379 | 3,414 | 385 | 4,178 |
| 2015 | Capital | Plant and | Motor | Total |
| works in | equipment | vehicles | ||
| progress | ||||
| $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | |
| Opening net book amount | - | - | - | - |
| Acquisitions | 30 | 2,885 | 259 | 3,174 |
| Additions | 14 | 244 | 93 | 351 |
| Disposals | - | - | (18) | (18) |
| Depreciation | - | (314) | (40) | (354) |
| Closing net book amount | 44 | 2,815 | 294 | 3,153 |
13 Investment property
| Investment property | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2015 | |
| $'000 | $'000 | |
| Opening balance | 142,379 | 138,108 |
| Acquisitions | 1,116 | - |
| Additions | 23,275 | 9,095 |
| Change in fair value | 3,343 | (4,824) |
| Disposals | (1,162) | - |
| Total | 168,951 | 142,379 |
| Amounts recognised in profit and loss | ||
| Rental income | 25,319 | 21,042 |
| Change in fair value | 3,343 | (4,824) |
Leasing arrangements
Minimum lease payments receivable under non-cancellable operating leases of investment properties, biological assets, plant and equipment and water rights not recognised in the financial statements, are receivable as follows:
| Within one year | 35,318 | 21,665 |
|---|---|---|
| Later than one year, but not later than five years | 156,153 | 105,396 |
| Later than fiveyears | 458,560 | 223,195 |
| Total | 650,031 | 350,256 |
55
Rural Funds Group Annual Report 2016
Rural Funds Group
Notes to the Financial Statements
30 June 2016
14 Other current assets
| Other current assets | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2015 | ||
| $'000 | $'000 | ||
| Prepayments | 118 | 166 | |
| Deposits | 1,066 | 141 | |
| Deposits - waterpurchases | 1,317 | - | |
| Total | 2,501 | 307 | |
| Financial assets | |||
| 2016 | 2015 | ||
| Note | $'000 | $'000 | |
| Non-current | |||
| Investment - RFM Poultry | 133 | 97 | |
| Investment - BIL | 509 | 520 | |
| Investment - CICL | 9,334 | - | |
| Investment - Macadamia Processing Co. Limited | 102 | - | |
| Total | 10,078 | 617 |
15 Financial assets
Coleambally Irrigation Co-operative Limited (CICL) is Australia's fourth largest irrigation company and is wholly owned by its farmer members. CICL's irrigation delivery system delivers water to 400,000 hectares of area across the Coleambally Irrigation District, in the Riverina, near Griffith, NSW.
56
Rural Funds Group
Notes to the Financial Statements
30 June 2016
16 Investments accounted for using the equity method
| RFM | StockBank | Perth Markets | Limited | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | |
| $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | |
| Summarised financial information for associates | ||||
| Summarised balance sheet | ||||
| Total current assets | 14,670 | 17,560 | 6,714 | - |
| Total non-current assets | - | - | 135,014 | - |
| Total current liabilities | (3,053) | (2,224) | (2,506) | - |
| Total non-current liabilities | - | (3,693) | (81,777) | - |
| Net assets | 11,617 | 11,643 | 57,445 | - |
| Reconciliation to carrying amounts | ||||
| Opening net assets | 11,643 | - | - | - |
| Net assets at date of gaining significant influence through: | ||||
| - Stapling with RFA | - | 11,656 | - | - |
| - Initial equity issue | - | 56,416 | ||
| Profit for the period | 588 | 341 | 1,029 | - |
| Other comprehensive income | - | - | - | - |
| Distributionsprovided for | (608) | (354) | - | - |
| Closing net assets | 11,623 | 11,643 | 57,445 | - |
| Group's share in % | 33.50% | 33.52% | 8.96% | - |
| Group's share in $'000 | 3,894 | 3,903 | 5,147 | - |
| Carrying value of investment | 3,894 | 3,903 | 5,147 | - |
| Summarised statement of comprehensive | income | |||
| Revenue | 2,328 | 1,440 | 5,764 | - |
| Profit from continuing operations | 588 | 341 | 1,029 | - |
| Other comprehensive income | - | - | - | - |
| Total comprehensive income | 588 | 341 | 1,029 | - |
| Distributions received or receivable from associate |
234 | 173 | - | - |
There are no commitments or contingencies relating to investments accounted for using the equity method.
57
Rural Funds Group Annual Report 2016
Rural Funds Group
Notes to the Financial Statements
30 June 2016
17 Intangible assets
Intangible assets include water rights and entitlements. Refer to note 5 for Directors’ valuation of water rights and entitlements.
rights and entitlements. |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 June 2016 | Water | Water | Water | Water | Total |
| licences: | licences: | licences: | licences: | ||
| Almonds | Poultry | Vineyards | Macadamias | ||
| infrastructure | |||||
| $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | |
| Non-current | |||||
| Opening net book amount |
27,416 | 1,049 | 500 | - | 28,965 |
| Additions | 30,327 | - | - | 54 | 30,381 |
| Acquisitions | - | - | - | 548 | 548 |
| Impairment | (203) | - | - | - | (203) |
| Closing net book amount |
57,540 | 1,049 | 500 | 602 | 59,691 |
| Cost | 57,743 | 1,049 | 500 | 602 | 59,894 |
| Accumulated | |||||
| amortisation and | (203) | - | - | - | (203) |
| impairment | |||||
| Net book amount | 57,540 | 1,049 | 500 | 602 | 59,691 |
| 30 June 2015 | Water | Water | Water | Water | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| licences: | licences: | licences: | licences: | ||
| Almonds | Poultry | Vineyards | Macadamias | ||
| infrastructure | |||||
| $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | |
| Non-current | |||||
| Opening net book amount |
22,041 | 1,049 | 500 | - | 23,590 |
| Additions | 2,730 | - | - | - | 2,730 |
| Reversal of impairment |
2,645 | - | - | - | 2,645 |
| Closing net book amount |
27,416 | 1,049 | 500 | - | 28,965 |
| Cost | 27,416 | 1,049 | 500 | - | 28,965 |
| Net book amount | 27,416 | 1,049 | 500 | - | 28,965 |
58
Rural Funds Group
Notes to the Financial Statements
30 June 2016
18 Trade and other payables
| Trade and other payables | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2015 | |
| $'000 | $'000 | |
| Trade payables | 659 | 226 |
| Accruals | 694 | 467 |
| Sundrycreditors | 5,567 | 1,345 |
| Total | 6,920 | 2,038 |
| Interest bearing liabilities | ||
| 2016 | 2015 | |
| $'000 | $'000 | |
| Current | ||
| Equipment loans(ANZ) | 3,030 | 657 |
| Total | 3,030 | 657 |
| Non-current | ||
| Borrowings (ANZ) | 146,500 | 89,650 |
| Equipment loans(ANZ) | - | 1,801 |
| Total | 146,500 | 91,451 |
19 Interest bearing liabilities
59
Rural Funds Group Annual Report 2016
| Borrowings with Australian and New Zealand Banking Group (ANZ) are secured by: | a fixed and floating charge over the assets held by Australian Executor Trustee Limited (AETL) as custodian for Rural Funds Trust, RFM Chicken Income Fund, |
RFM Australian Wine Fund and RF Active; and, | registered mortgages over all property owned by the Rural Funds Trust and its subsidiaries are provided by AETL as custodian for the Rural Funds Trust and its |
subsidiaries. | The following assets are pledged as security over the loans: | 2016 Investment property Water licences Biological assets Financial assets Plant and equipment TOTAL |
$'000 $'000 $'000 $'000 $'000 $'000 |
Mortgage: almond property leasing 58,329 57,540 89,614 9,334 - 214,817 |
Mortgage: poultry property and infrastructure leasing 86,011 1,049 - - - 87,060 |
Mortgage: vineyard leasing 23,156 500 17,449 509 - 41,614 |
Mortgage: macadamia orchard leasing 1,455 602 6,143 - - 8,200 |
Equipment loans - - - - 4,178 4,178 |
Total 168,951 59,691 113,206 9,843 4,178 355,869 |
2015 Investment property Water licences Biological assets Financial assets Plant and equipment TOTAL |
$'000 $'000 $'000 $'000 $'000 $'000 |
Mortgage: almond property leasing 36,927 27,416 42,735 - - 107,078 |
Mortgage: poultry property and infrastructure leasing 91,917 1,049 - - - 92,966 |
Mortgage: vineyard leasing 13,535 500 24,846 520 - 39,401 |
Equipment loans - - - - 3,153 3,153 |
Total 142,379 28,965 67,581 520 3,153 242,598 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
60
Rural Funds Group
Notes to the Financial Statements
30 June 2016
19 Interest bearing liabilities (continued)
Loan amounts are provided by ANZ at the Bank’s floating rate, plus a margin. For bank reporting purposes, these assets are valued at market value. Refer to note 5 for Directors’ valuation of water rights and entitlements
Borrowings
At 30 June 2016 the core debt facility available to the Group, and due to expire in December 2018, was $147,500,000 (2015: $103,000,000). The facility limit increased to $200,000,000 on 12 July 2016. As at 30 June 2016 RFF has active interest rate swaps totalling 60% of the drawn down balance (2015: 84%) to manage interest rate risk.
Loan covenants
Under the terms of the ANZ borrowing facility, the Group is required to comply with the following financial covenants:
-
maintenance of a maximum loan to value ratio of 50%;
-
maintenance of net tangible assets in excess of $150,000,000; and,
-
an interest cover ratio for the Group not less than 2.50:1.00.
Rural Funds Group has complied with the financial covenants of its borrowing facilities during the year.
20 Other non-current liabilities
| 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|
| $'000 | $'000 | |
| Lessee deposits | 1,634 | 1,553 |
| Total | 1,634 | 1,553 |
21 Derivative financial instruments
| Derivative financial instruments | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2015 | |
| $'000 | $'000 | |
| Interest rate swaps | 9,190 | 2,048 |
| Total | 9,190 | 2,048 |
61
Rural Funds Group Annual Report 2016
Rural Funds Group
Notes to the Financial Statements
30 June 2016
22 Deferred tax
| Deferred tax | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2015 | |
| $'000 | $'000 | |
| Deferred tax liabilities | ||
| Biological assets | 3,513 | 5,720 |
| Plant & equipment | 2,381 | 2,070 |
| Fair value investmentproperty | 515 | - |
| Gross deferred tax liabilities | 6,409 | 7,790 |
| Deferred tax assets | ||
| Fair value investment property | - | 2,112 |
| Investments | 227 | 223 |
| Legal costs | 80 | 126 |
| Other | 21 | 17 |
| Unused income tax losses | 7,201 | 7,629 |
| Gross deferred tax assets | 7,529 | 10,107 |
| Set off of deferred tax liabilities | (6,409) | (7,790) |
| Net deferred tax assets | 1,120 | 2,317 |
The deferred tax assets include an amount of $7,201,000 (2015: $7,629,000), which includes $7,151,000 (2015: $7,629,000) of carried forward tax losses of the RFM Australian Wine Fund. The Group has concluded that the deferred tax assets will be recoverable using the estimated future taxable income based on budgets and the contracted cash flows of the subsidiary. The losses can be carried forward indefinitely and have no expiry date.
23 Recognised deferred tax assets and liabilities
| Current income tax | Current income tax | Current income tax | Deferred income tax | Deferred income tax | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 2015 |
2016 |
2015 |
|||
| $'000 $'000 |
$'000 |
$'000 |
|||
| Opening balance | (29) | - | 2,317 | 1,576 |
|
| Credited/(charged) to income | 29 | (29) | (1,204) | 741 | |
| Credited to equity | - | - | 7 |
- |
|
| Closing balance | - | (29) | 1,120 | 2,317 |
|
| Tax expense/(credit) in the Consolidated | Statement of Comprehensive | 1,175 | (712) |
||
| Income | |||||
| Amounts recognised in the Consolidated | Statement of Financial Position: | ||||
| Deferred tax asset | 1,120 | 2,317 |
|||
| Issued units | |||||
| 2016 | 2015 | ||||
| No. | $ |
No. | $ | ||
| Units on issue at the beginning of the | 132,142,235 | 113,034,000 |
117,099,159 |
108,281,000 | |
| year | |||||
| Units issued during the year | 33,215,055 | 35,148,000 |
15,043,076 | 15,017,000 | |
| Distributions to unitholders | - | (12,389,000) | - (10,264,000) |
||
| Units on issue at the end of theyear | 165,357,290 | 135,793,000 |
132,142,235 |
113,034,000 |
24 Issued units
62
Rural Funds Group
Notes to the Financial Statements
30 June 2016
25 Asset revaluation reserve
| Asset revaluation reserve | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2015 | |
| $'000 | $'000 | |
| Opening balance | 1,406 | 1,398 |
| Net(decrement)/increment in financial assets | (14) | 8 |
| Total comprehensive income | (14) | 8 |
| Income tax applicable | - | - |
| Total | 1,392 | 1,406 |
26 Distributions
The Group paid and declared the following distributions in the year:
| Cents | Total | |
|---|---|---|
| per unit | $ | |
| Distribution declared 1 June 2015, paid 30 July 2015 | 2.1475 | 2,837,755 |
| Distribution paid 30 October 2015 | 2.2325 | 2,955,482 |
| Distribution paid 29 January 2016 | 2.2325 | 3,670,193 |
| Distribution paid 29 April 2016 | 2.2325 | 3,681,201 |
| Distribution declared 1 June 2016, paid 29 July 2016 | 2.2325 | 3,691,602 |
| The holders of ordinary units are entitled to participate in distributions and the proceeds on winding up of | ||
| the Group. On a show of hands at meetings of the Group, each holder of ordinary units has one vote in | ||
| person or by proxy, and upon a poll each unit is entitled to one vote. | ||
| The Group does not have authorised capital or par value in respect of its units. | ||
| Earnings per unit | ||
| 2016 | 2015 | |
| Per stapled unit | ||
| Net profit after income tax for the year ($'000) | 34,788 | 10,153 |
| Weighted average number of units on issue during the year | 154,854,317 | 121,153,081 |
| Basic and diluted earnings per unit (total) (cents) | 22.46 | 8.38 |
| Per unit of Rural Funds Trust | ||
| Net profit after income tax for the year ($'000) | 34,658 | 10,080 |
| Weighted average number of units on issue during the year | 154,854,317 | 121,153,081 |
| Basic and diluted earnings per unit (total) (cents) | 22.38 | 8.32 |
| Per unit of RF Active | ||
| Net profit after income tax for the year ($'000) | 130 | 73 |
| Weighted average number of units on issue during the year | 154,854,317 | 122,787,543 |
| Basic and diluted earnings per unit (total) (cents) | 0.08 | 0.06 |
The holders of ordinary units are entitled to participate in distributions and the proceeds on winding up of the Group. On a show of hands at meetings of the Group, each holder of ordinary units has one vote in person or by proxy, and upon a poll each unit is entitled to one vote.
The Group does not have authorised capital or par value in respect of its units.
27 Earnings per unit
63
Rural Funds Group Annual Report 2016
Rural Funds Group
Notes to the Financial Statements
30 June 2016
28 Capital commitments
Significant capital expenditure relating to the Kerarbury and Tocabil almond developments, contracted for but not recognised as liabilities is as follows:
but not recognised as liabilities is as follows: |
||
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2015 | |
| $'000 | $'000 | |
| Plant and equipment | 440 | - |
| Investment property | 33,039 | 5,817 |
| Intangible assets | 39,655 | 4,149 |
| Biological assets | 67,515 | 14,833 |
| Total | 140,649 | 24,799 |
29 Fair value measurement of assets and liabilities
Fair value hierarchy
This note explains the judgements and estimates made in determining the fair values of the financial instruments that are recognised and measured at fair value in the financial statements. To provide an indication about the reliability of the inputs used in determining fair value, the Group has classified its financial instruments into the three levels prescribed under the Australian Accounting Standards.
AASB 13 Fair Value Measurement requires all assets and liabilities measured at fair value to be assigned to a level in the fair value hierarchy. The level in the fair value hierarchy is determined having regard to the nature of inputs used to determine fair value. The hierarchy is as follows:
Level 1 Fair value based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the entity can access at the measurement date (such as publicly traded equities).
Level 2 Fair value based on inputs other than quoted prices included within level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 3 One or more significant inputs to the determination of fair value is based on unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.
64
Rural Funds Group
Notes to the Financial Statements
30 June 2016
29 Fair value measurement of assets and liabilities (continued)
Financial assets and liabilities
Fair value hierarchy
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | $'000 | |
| At 30 June 2016 | ||||
| Recurring fair value measurements | ||||
| Financial assets | ||||
| Equity securities (listed) | 133 | - | - | 133 |
| Equitysecurities(unlisted) | - | - | 9,945 | 9,945 |
| Total | 133 | - | 9,945 | 10,078 |
| Financial liabilities | ||||
| Derivatives | - | 9,190 | - | 9,190 |
| Total | - | 9,190 | - | 9,190 |
| At 30 June 2015 | ||||
| Financial assets | ||||
| Equity securities (listed) | 97 | - | - | 97 |
| Equitysecurities(unlisted) | - | - | 520 | 520 |
| Total | 97 | - | 520 | 617 |
| Financial liabilities | ||||
| Derivatives | - | 2,048 | - | 2,048 |
| Total | - | 2,048 | - | 2,048 |
There were no transfers between levels for recurring fair value measurements during the year.
The Group’s policy is to recognise transfers into and out of fair value hierarchy levels at the end of the reporting period. There were no transfers in the current year (2015: nil).
Valuation techniques used to determine fair values
Specific valuation techniques used to value financial instruments include:
-
the use of quoted market prices or dealer quotes for similar instruments;
-
the present value of the estimated future cash flows based on observable yield curves to determine the fair value of the interest rate swaps; and,
-
discounted cash flow analysis to determine the fair value of the remaining financial instruments.
All of the resulting fair value estimates are included in level 1 or 2 except for unlisted equity securities which are level 3, where the fair values have been determined based on present values and the discount rates used were adjusted for counterparty or own credit risk.
65
Rural Funds Group Annual Report 2016
Rural Funds Group
Notes to the Financial Statements
30 June 2016
29 Fair value measurement of assets and liabilities (continued)
Financial assets and liabilities (continued)
Fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (level 3)
The following table presents the changes in level 3 items for the years ended 30 June 2016 and 30 June 2015:
2015: |
||
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2015 | |
| $ | $ | |
| Unlisted equity securities | ||
| Opening balance | 520 | 520 |
| Additions | 9,437 | - |
| Losses recognised in other comprehensive income | (12) | - |
| Closingbalance | 9,945 | 520 |
Valuation inputs and relationship to fair value
| Fair | Range of | Relationship | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Description | value at 30 June |
Unobservable inputs |
inputs (probability - weighted |
of unobservable inputs to fair |
| 2016 | average) | value | ||
| $'000 | ||||
| Investment in BIL | 509 | Price of water entitlements | +/- 10% | +/- $50,000 |
| Investment in CICL | 9,334 | Price of water entitlements | +/- 10% | +/- $933,000 |
| Closingbalance | 9,843 | - | - | - |
The Group’s investment in Macadamia Processing Co. Limited is held at cost.
66
Rural Funds Group
Notes to the Financial Statements
30 June 2016
29 Fair value measurement of assets and liabilities (continued)
Non-financial assets
Fair value hierarchy
This note explains the judgements and estimates made in determining fair values of the non-financial assets that are recognised and measured at fair value in the financial statements. To provide an indication about the reliability of the inputs used in determining fair value, the Group has classified its non-financial assets and liabilities into the three levels prescribed under Australian Accounting Standards as mentioned above. At 30 June 2016 all non-financial assets are level 3.
| Level 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|
| $'000 | $'000 | |
| At 30 June 2016 | ||
| Investment properties | ||
| Almond orchard property | 58,329 | 58,329 |
| Poultry property and infrastructure | 86,011 | 86,011 |
| Vineyard property | 23,156 | 23,156 |
| Macadamia orchard property | 1,455 | 1,455 |
| Biological assets | ||
| Almond orchard | 89,614 | 89,614 |
| Vines | 17,449 | 17,449 |
| Macadamia orchard | 6,143 | 6,143 |
| Total non-financial assets | 282,157 | 282,157 |
| At 30 June 2015 | ||
| Investment properties | ||
| Almond orchard property | 36,926 | 36,926 |
| Poultry property and infrastructure | 91,918 | 91,918 |
| Vineyard property | 13,535 | 13,535 |
| Macadamia orchard property | - | - |
| Biological assets | ||
| Almond orchard | 42,735 | 42,735 |
| Vines | 24,846 | 24,846 |
| Macadamia orchard | - | - |
| Total non-financial assets | 209,960 | 209,960 |
The Group’s policy is to recognise transfers in to and transfers out of fair value hierarchy levels as at the end of the reporting period. There were no transfers between levels for recurring fair value measurements during the year.
Valuation techniques used to determine level 3 fair values
The Group obtains independent valuations for its property assets at least annually, except for properties that are under development. At the end of each reporting period, the directors update their assessment of fair value of each property, taking into account the most recent independent valuations. The directors determine a property’s value within a range of reasonable fair value estimates.
67
Rural Funds Group Annual Report 2016
| 29 Fair value measurement of assets and liabilities (continued) |
The best evidence of fair value is current prices in an active market for similar properties. Where such information is not available the directors consider information from | a variety of sources including: | current prices in an active market for properties of different nature or recent prices of similar properties in less active markets, adjusted to reflect those differences; |
discounted cash flow projections based on reliable estimates of future cash flows; and |
capitalised income projections based upon a property’s estimated net market income, and a capitalisation rate derived from an analysis of market evidence. |
All resulting fair value estimates for properties are included in level 3. | Fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (level 3) | Investment Property Biological assets |
Almond Poultry Vineyard Macadamia Almond Vines Macadamia Total |
orchard property property orchard orchard orchard |
property and infra- property |
structure | $'000 $'000 $'000 $'000 $'000 $'000 $'000 $'000 |
Opening balance 1 July 2015 36,927 91,917 13,535 - 42,735 24,846 - 209,960 |
Additions 23,138 - - 137 12,200 - 1,405 36,880 |
Acquisitions - - - 1,116 - - 5,525 6,641 |
Disposals (1,162) - - - - - - (1,162) |
Fair value adjustment (574) (5,906) 9,621 202 34,679 (7,397) (787) 29,838 |
Closing balance 30 June 2016 58,329 86,011 23,156 1,455 89,614 17,449 6,143 282,157 |
Opening balance 1 July 2014 29,227 95,981 12,900 - 41,426 24,080 - 203,614 |
Additions 8,755 340 - - - 240 - 9,335 |
Fair value adjustment (1,055) (4,404) 635 - 1,309 526 - (2,989) |
Closing balance 30 June 2015 36,927 91,917 13,535 - 42,735 24,846 - 209,960 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
68
Rural Funds Group
Notes to the Financial Statements
30 June 2016
29 Fair value measurement of assets and liabilities (continued)
Valuation inputs and relationships to fair value
The following table summarises the quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used in recurring level 3 fair value measurements. See above for the valuation techniques adopted.
| Description | Fair value at | Fair value at | Unobservable inputs* |
Range of inputs (probability - weighted average) |
Range of inputs (probability - weighted average) |
Relationship of unobservable inputs to fair value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 June 2016 $'000 |
30 June 2015 $'000 |
30 June 2016 % |
30 June 2015 % |
|||
| Almond orchard property (excluding water licences)** |
147,943 | 79,662 | Discount rate | 9.00% (9.00%) |
9.5%- 10.5% (10.26%) |
The higher the discount rate, the lower the fair value. |
| Poultry property and infrastructure (excluding water licences)** |
86,011 | 91,918 | Capitalisation rate |
10.75% - 13.00% (12.01%) |
11.32% | The higher the capitalisation rate, the lower the fair value. |
| Vineyard (excluding water licences)** |
40,605 | 38,380 | Discount rate | 9.75% (9.75%) |
9.5%- 10.5% (10.06%) |
The higher the discount rate, the lower the fair value. |
| Macadamia orchard property (excluding water licences)** |
7,598 | - | Discount rate | 9.00% (9.00%) |
n/a | The higher the capitalisation rate, the lower the fair value. |
- There were no significant inter-relationships between unobservable inputs that materially affect fair values.
** Water licences are held at historical cost less accumulated impairment, as detailed in note 17 to the consolidated financial statements.
Valuation processes
The Group engages external, independent and qualified valuers to determine the fair value of the Group’s properties. The properties were externally valued by CBRE Valuations Pty Limited, Opteon (Victoria) Pty Limited, and Gaetjens Pickett Valuers at 30 June 2016. Director’s valuations have been performed on the poultry assets at 30 June 2016, based on the valuation methodology applied by the valuer and applying Director’s assumptions to take a more conservative view on the valuations.
The main level 3 inputs used by the Group include discount rates and capitalisation rates estimated in the respective valuations based on comparable transactions and industry data. Changes in level 3 fair values are analysed at each reporting date during the valuation discussion between management and external valuers. As part of this discussion management presents updated model inputs and explains the reason for any fair value movements.
69
Rural Funds Group Annual Report 2016
Rural Funds Group
Notes to the Financial Statements
30 June 2016
30 Financial risk management
The Group is exposed to a variety of financial risks through its use of financial instruments. This note discloses the Group‘s objectives, policies and processes for managing and measuring these risks. The Group‘s overall risk management plan seeks to minimise potential adverse effects due to the unpredictability of financial markets.
The Group does not speculate in financial assets.
The most significant financial risks which the Group is exposed to are described below:
Specific risks
-
Market risk - interest rate risk and price risk
-
Credit risk
-
Liquidity risk
Financial instruments used
The principal categories of financial instrument used by the Group are:
-
Trade receivables
-
Cash at bank
-
Bank overdraft
-
Trade and other payables
-
Floating rate bank loans
-
Interest rate swaps
Financial risk management policies
Risks arising from holding financial instruments are inherent in the Group’s activities and are managed through a process of ongoing identification, measurement and monitoring.
The responsible entity is responsible for identifying and controlling the risks that arise from these financial instruments.
The risks are measured using a method that reflects the expected impact on the results and net assets attributable to unitholders of the Group from changes in the relevant risk variables. Information about these risk exposures at the reporting date, measured on this basis, is disclosed below.
Concentrations of risk arise where a number of financial instruments or contracts are entered into with the same counterparty, or where a number of counterparties are engaged in similar business activities that would cause their ability to meet contractual obligations to be similarly affected by changes in economic, political or other conditions.
70
| 30 June 2016 | 30 Financial risk management (continued) |
Liquidity risk and capital management | The table below reflects all contractually fixed repayments and interest resulting from recognised financial assets and liabilities as at 30 June 2016. The amounts | disclosed in the table are the contractual undiscounted cash flows, except for interest rate swaps and bills of exchange where the cash flows have been estimated using | interest rates applicable at the reporting date. | Less than 6 months 6 months to 1 year 1 to 3 years 3 to 5 years Over 5 years Total |
2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 |
$'000 $'000 $'000 $'000 $'000 $'000 $'000 $'000 $'000 $'000 $'000 $'000 |
Financial assets - |
Cash and cash equivalents 3,034 712 - - - - - - - - 3,034 712 |
Trade and other receivables 7,239 2,729 - - - - - - - - 7,239 2,729 |
Investment - BIL - - - - - - - - 509 520 509 520 |
Investment - CICL - - - - - - - - 9,334 - 9,334 - |
Investment - MPC - - - - - - - - 102 - 102 - |
Investment - RFP - - - - - - - - 133 97 133 97 |
Total 10,273 3,441 - - - - - - 10,078 617 20,351 4,058 |
Financial liabilities - |
Interest bearing liabilities 2,560 1,927 3,560 1,927 155,740 7,710 - 95,908 - - 161,860 107,472 |
Trade and other payables 6,920 2,038 - - - - - - - - 6,920 2,038 |
Equipment loans 485 500 447 308 1,564 1,102 803 755 149 223 3,448 2,888 |
Interest rate swaps 568 - - - 1,301 1,016 244 1,032 7,077 - 9,190 2,048 |
Total 10,533 4,465 4,007 2,235 158,605 9,828 1,047 97,695 7,226 223 181,418 114,446 |
The Group manages liquidity risk by monitoring forecast cash flows and ensuring that adequate unutilised borrowing facilities are maintained. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
71
Rural Funds Group Annual Report 2016
Rural Funds Group
Notes to the Financial Statements
30 June 2016
30 Financial risk management (continued)
Liquidity risk and capital management (continued)
The responsible entity of the Group defines capital as net assets attributable to unitholders. The Group's objectives when managing capital are to safeguard the going concern of the Group and to maintain an optimal capital structure.
The Group is able to maintain or adjust its capital by divesting assets to reduce debt or adjusting the amount of distributions paid to unitholders.
Interest rate swaps held for hedging
Interest rate risk is managed by using a floating rate debt and through the use of interest rate swap contracts. The Group does not speculate in the trading of derivative instruments.
Interest rate swap transactions are entered into by the Trust to exchange variable and fixed interest payment obligations to protect long-term borrowings from the risk of increasing interest rates. The economic entity has variable interest rate debt and enters into swap contracts to receive interest at variable rates and pay interest at fixed rates.
The notional principal amounts of the swap contracts approximates 60% (2015: 84%) of the Group's drawn down balance at 30 June 2016.
At balance date, the details of the interest rate swap contracts are:
| Effective average | Effective average | Balance | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| interest rate payable | ||||
| 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | |
| % | % | $'000 | $'000 | |
| Maturity of notional amounts | ||||
| Settlement - between 1 to 3 years | 3.44 | 3.27 | 75,000 | 50,000 |
| Settlement - between 3 to 5 years | - | 3.77 | - | 25,000 |
| Settlement -greater than 5years | 3.42 | - | 13,000 | - |
| Total | 88,000 | 75,000 |
The following interest rate swap contracts have been entered into at 30 June 2016 but are not yet effective.
| Effective average | Effective average | Balance | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| interest rate payable | ||||
| 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | |
| % | % | $'000 | $'000 | |
| Maturity of notional amounts | ||||
| Settlement - between 3 to 5 years | 2.50 | 2.50 | 10,000 | 10,000 |
| Settlement -greater than 5years | 3.10 | 2.70 | 75,000 | 15,000 |
| Total | 85,000 | 25,000 |
The net loss recognised on the swap derivative instruments for the year ended 30 June 2016 was $7,116,000 (2015: $734,000).
72
Rural Funds Group
Notes to the Financial Statements
30 June 2016
30 Financial risk management (continued)
Interest rate swaps held for hedging (continued)
At 30 June 2016 the Group had the following mix of financial assets and liabilities exposed to variable interest rates:
interest rates: |
||
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2015 | |
| $'000 | $'000 | |
| Cash | 3,034 | 712 |
| Interest bearingliabilities | (146,500) | (92,109) |
| Total | (143,466) | (91,397) |
At 30 June 2016, 2.03% (2015: 0.71%) of the Group’s debt is fixed, excluding the impact of interest rate swap contracts.
Credit risk
The maximum exposure to credit risk (excluding the value of any collateral or other security) at balance date to recognised financial assets is the carrying amount, net of any provisions for impairment of those assets. This has been disclosed in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position and notes to the financial statements.
Credit risk for derivative financial instruments arises from the potential failure by counterparties to the contract to meet their obligations.
Market risk
Interest rate risk (sensitivity analysis)
At 30 June 2016, the effect on profit before tax and equity as a result of changes in the interest rate, net of the effect of interest rate swaps, with all other variables remaining constant, would be as follows:
| 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|
| $'000 | $'000 | |
| Change in profit before income tax: | ||
| Increase in interest rate by 1% | 6,556 | 2,098 |
| Decrease in interest rate by 1% | (7,221) | (2,181) |
| Change in equity: | ||
| Increase in interest rate by 1% | 4,498 | 1,469 |
| Decrease in interest rate by 1% | (4,964) | (1,527) |
73
Rural Funds Group Annual Report 2016
32 Key management personnel
Rural Funds Group
Notes to the Financial Statements 30 June 2016
31 Business combinations
On 15 March 2016 the Group acquired two macadamia orchards located near Bundaberg, QLD and the leasing businesses associated with these orchards. The acquisition represents the Group’s measured first step into the macadamia industry. The consolidated results for the Group for the year includes 3 months and 15 days of results from the leasing businesses acquired.
| 2016 | |
|---|---|
| $'000 | |
| Purchase consideration | 7,291 |
| Assets and liabilities recognised as a result of the acquisition were as follows: | |
| Investment property | 1,116 |
| Biological assets | 5,525 |
| Intangible assets | 548 |
| Financial assets | 102 |
| Net assets acquired | 7,291 |
Revenue and profit contribution
The acquired business contributed revenues of $187,000 to the Group for the period from 15 March to 30 June 2016.
Acquisition-related costs
Acquisition-related costs of $452,000 are included in other expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income and in operating cash flows in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.
Directors
The Directors of RFM are considered to be key management personnel of the Group. The Directors of the responsible entity in office during the year and up to the date of this report are:
Guy Paynter David Bryant Michael Carroll
Interests of Directors of the responsible entity
Units in the Group held by Directors of RFM or related entities controlled by Directors of RFM as at 30 June 2016 are:
| Guy Paynter | David Bryant | |
|---|---|---|
| Units | Units | |
| Balance at 30 June 2014 | 351,833 | 3,287,372 |
| Additions | 30,323 | 368,819 |
| Balance at 30 June 2015 | 382,156 | 3,656,191 |
| Additions | 151,100 | 3,987,152 |
| Balance at 30 June 2016 | 533,256 | 7,643,343 |
74
Rural Funds Group
Notes to the Financial Statements
30 June 2016
32 Key management personnel (continued)
Other key management personnel
In addition to the Directors noted above, RFM, as the responsible entity of the Group is considered to be key management personnel with the authority for the strategic direction and management of the Group.
The constitutions of Rural Funds Trust and RF Active (the stapled entities forming the Group) are legally binding documents between the unitholders of the Group and RFM as responsible entity. Under the constitutions, RFM is entitled to the following remuneration:
-
Management fee: 0.6% per annum (2015: 0.6%) of the gross value of Group assets; and,
-
Asset management fee: 0.45% per annum (2015: 0.45%) of the gross value of Group assets.
Compensation of key management personnel
No amount is paid by the Group directly to the directors of the responsible entity. Consequently, no compensation as defined in AASB 124 Related Party Disclosures is paid by the Group to the Directors as key management personnel. Fees paid to RFM as responsible entity are disclosed in note 33.
75
Rural Funds Group Annual Report 2016
Rural Funds Group
Notes to the Financial Statements
30 June 2016
33 Related party transactions
Transactions between the Group and related parties are on commercial terms and conditions.
Responsible entity (Rural Funds Management) and related entities
Transactions between the Group and the responsible entity and its associated entities are shown below:
| 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|
| $'000 | $'000 | |
| Management fee | 1,809 | 1,435 |
| Asset management fee | 1,357 | 1,061 |
| Total management fees | 3,166 | 2,496 |
| Expenses reimbursed to RFM | 2,231 | 2,114 |
| Expenses reimbursed to RFM Poultry | - | 135 |
| Expenses due to Murdock Viticulture | 199 | 518 |
| Distributionpaid/payable to RFM | 376 | 128 |
| Total amountpaid to RFM and related entities | 5,972 | 5,391 |
| Rental income received from RFM Almond Fund 2006 | 1,945 | 1,719 |
| Rental income received from RFM Almond Fund 2007 | 588 | 501 |
| Rental income received from RFM Almond Fund 2008 | 1,498 | 1,300 |
| Rental income received from RFM | 372 | 279 |
| Rental income received from RFM Farming Pty Limited | 390 | - |
| Rental income received from RFM Poultry | 10,450 | 10,349 |
| Rental income received from 2007 Macgrove Project | 140 | - |
| Expenses charged to RFM Poultry | 54 | 482 |
| Distribution received/receivable from RFM Poultry | 14 | 15 |
| Distribution received/receivable from RFM StockBank | 234 | 244 |
| Interest income from Murdock Viticulture | - | 19 |
| Water sale proceeds from RFM Almond Fund 2006 | 59 | 45 |
| Water sale proceeds from RFM Almond Fund 2007 | 16 | 12 |
| Water sale proceeds from RFM Almond Fund 2008 | 44 | 35 |
| Water sale proceeds from RFM | 9 | 7 |
| Water saleproceeds from RFM FarmingPtyLimited | 52 | - |
| Total amounts received from RFM and related entities | 15,865 | 15,007 |
Murdock Viticulture is a vineyard manager 28% owned by RFM.
Debtors
| 2016 | 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| $'000 | $'000 | ||
| RFM | Farming Pty Limited | 3 | - |
| RFM | 41 | 204 | |
| RFM | Macadamias Pty Limited | 20 | - |
| 2007 | Macgrove Project | 538 | - |
| Total | 602 | 204 |
76
Rural Funds Group
Notes to the Financial Statements
30 June 2016
33 Related party transactions (continued)
| Related party transactions (continued) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creditors | ||||
| 2016 | 2015 | |||
| $'000 | $'000 | |||
| RFM | 153 | 180 | ||
| Total | 153 | 180 | ||
| Entities with influence over the Group | ||||
| 2016 | 2015 | |||
| Units | % | Units | % | |
| Rural Funds Management Limited | 5,153,833 | 3.12 | 1,450,465 | 1.24 |
| Interest in related parties | ||||
| 2016 | 2015 | |||
| Units | % | Units | % | |
| RFM StockBank | 3,897,259 | 33.50 | 3,897,259 | 33.52 |
| RFM Poultry | 108,615 | 1.58 | 108,615 | 1.58 |
77
Rural Funds Group Annual Report 2016
Rural Funds Group
Notes to the Financial Statements 30 June 2016
34 Cash flow information
Reconciliation of net profit after income tax to cash flow from operating activities:
| 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|
| $'000 | $'000 | |
| Net profit after income tax | 34,788 | 10,153 |
| Cash flows excluded from profit attributable to operating activities | ||
| Non-cash flows in profit | ||
| Share of net profit - equity accounted investments | (61) | (125) |
| Change in fair value of biological assets | (26,495) | (1,835) |
| Change in fair value of investment property | (3,343) | 4,824 |
| Change in fair value of interest rate swaps | 7,116 | 734 |
| Depreciation and impairments | 939 | 490 |
| Reversal of impairment of intangible assets | - | (2,645) |
| (Gain)/loss on sale of assets | (290) | 5 |
| Change in fair value of other assets | (36) | (113) |
| Changes in assets and liabilities | ||
| (Increase)/decrease in trade and other receivables | (4,510) | 931 |
| (Increase)/decrease in prepayments | 48 | (65) |
| Increase/(decrease) in trade and other payables | 4,878 | (1,359) |
| Increase/(decrease) in unearned income | - | (476) |
| Increase/(decrease) in GST (net) | - | (562) |
| (Increase)/decreaseindeferred taxassets (net) | 1,197 | (735) |
| Net cash inflow from operating activities | 14,231 | 9,222 |
35 Events after the reporting date
In July 2016 the Group successfully completed a non-renounceable rights issue of $61,000,000 (1 new unit for every 4 existing units), in order to fund the acquisitions of the macadamia orchards and cattle properties and expansions to the almond development at Kerarbury by a further 1,000 hectares.
In July 2016 the Group negotiated an increase to its debt facility from $147,500,000 to $200,000,000.
In July and August 2016 the Group acquired three cattle properties: Rewan, a 17,500 hectare cattle property near Rolleston, QLD and Oakland Park and Mutton Hole, located near the Gulf of Carpentaria in far north Queensland and comprising a combined area of 225,800 hectares. The acquisition of the three cattle properties and associated livestock will increase the Group’s total assets by approximately $50,000,000. The properties and livestock will be leased for ten years to Cattle JV Pty Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of RFM.
No other matter or circumstance has arisen since the end of the year that has significantly affected or could significantly affect the operations of the Group, the results of those operations or the state of affairs of the Group in future financial years.
78
Rural Funds Group
Notes to the Financial Statements 30 June 2016
36 Parent entity
The individual financial statements of the parent entity, Rural Funds Trust, show the following aggregate amounts:
amounts: |
||
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2015 | |
| $'000 | $'000 | |
| Statement of Financial Position | ||
| ASSETS | ||
| Current assets | 58,736 | 49,824 |
| Non-current assets | 294,920 | 179,918 |
| Total assets | 353,656 | 229,742 |
| LIABILITIES | ||
| Current liabilities | 10,578 | 4,830 |
| Non-currentliabilities | 157,324 | 93,251 |
| Total liabilities (excluding net assets attributable to unitholders) |
167,902 | 98,081 |
| Net assets attributable to unitholders | 185,754 | 131,661 |
| Total liabilities | 353,656 | 229,742 |
| Statement of Comprehensive Income | ||
| Net profit after income tax | 33,313 | 6,332 |
| Other comprehensive income for the period, net of tax | (14) | 8 |
| Total comprehensive income attributable to unitholders | 33,299 | 6,340 |
79
Rural Funds Group Annual Report 2016
Rural Funds Group
Directors’ Declaration
30 June 2016
In the Directors of the Responsible Entity’s opinion:
-
1 The financial statements and notes of Rural Funds Group set out on pages 35 to 79 are in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001 , including:
-
a. complying with Accounting Standards, the Corporations Regulations 2001 and other mandatory professional reporting requirements; and
-
b. giving a true and fair view of the Group’s financial position as at 30 June 2016 and of its performance for the financial year ended on that date; and
-
2 There are reasonable grounds to believe that the Group will be able to pay its debts as and when they become due and payable.
Note 2 confirms that the financial statements also comply with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.
The Directors have been given the declarations by the persons performing the chief executive officer and chief financial officer functions as required by section 295A of the Corporations Act 2001 .
This declaration is made in accordance with a resolution of the Board of the Directors of Rural Funds Management Limited.
David Bryant Director
24 August 2016
80
==> picture [67 x 51] intentionally omitted <==
Independent auditor’s report to the unitholders of Rural Funds Group
Report on the financial report
We have audited the accompanying financial report of Rural Funds Group (the registered scheme), which comprises the consolidated statement of financial position as at 30 June 2016, the consolidated statement of comprehensive income, consolidated statement of changes in net assets attributable to unitholders and consolidated statement of cash flows for the year ended on that date, a summary of significant accounting policies, other explanatory notes and the directors’ declaration for Rural Funds Group (the consolidated entity). The consolidated entity comprises the registered scheme and the entities it controlled at year’s end or from time to time during the financial year.
Directors' responsibility for the financial report
The directors of Rural Funds Management Limited (the responsible entity) are responsible for the preparation of the financial report that gives a true and fair view in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Act 2001 and for such internal control as the directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of the financial report that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. In Note 2, the directors also state, in accordance with Accounting Standard AASB 101 Presentation of Financial Statements , that the financial statements comply with International Financial Reporting Standards.
Auditor’s responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial report based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards. Those standards require that we comply with relevant ethical requirements relating to audit engagements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial report is free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial report. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgement, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial report, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the consolidated entity’s preparation and fair presentation of the financial report in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by the directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial report.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
Independence
In conducting our audit, we have complied with the independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 .
PricewaterhouseCoopers, ABN 52 780 433 757 Darling Park Tower 2, 201 Sussex Street, GPO BOX 2650, SYDNEY NSW 1171 T: +61 2 8266 0000, F: +61 2 8266 9999, www.pwc.com.au
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.
81
Rural Funds Group Annual Report 2016
==> picture [67 x 50] intentionally omitted <==
Auditor’s opinion
In our opinion:
-
(a) the financial report of Rural Funds Group is in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, including:
-
(i) giving a true and fair view of the consolidated entity's financial position as at 30 June 2016 and of its performance for the year ended on that date; and
-
(ii) complying with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Regulations 2001 .
-
(b) the financial report and notes also comply with International Financial Reporting Standards as disclosed in Note 2.
==> picture [121 x 45] intentionally omitted <==
PricewaterhouseCoopers
==> picture [96 x 43] intentionally omitted <==
David Ronald Partner
Sydney 24 August 2016
82
==> picture [596 x 421] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [596 x 142] intentionally omitted <==
ruralfunds.com.au