Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

RUMBLE RESOURCES LIMITED Regulatory Filings 2021

Dec 20, 2021

65736_rns_2021-12-20_b431e5a0-61b4-4abe-9046-a59c63fd11fb.pdf

Regulatory Filings

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

21st December 2021

Major Zinc-Lead-Silver-Copper Feeder Fault Zone Intersected

Chinook Zn-Pb-Ag-Mn-Cu Prospect

  • The top of a large-scale sub-vertical feeder fault zone intersected in drill-hole EHRC136 has returned a broad zone of mineralisation (84m @ 1.84% Zn + Pb from 151m – mineralised section) with multiple intersections. Results are:
    • 37m @ 3.25% Zn + Pb, 7.18 g/t Ag from 196m including
      • o 10m @ 6.57% Zn + Pb, 16.24 g/t Ag from 200m
        • Includes 1m @ 17.1% Zn + Pb, 20.9 g/t Ag from 202m
        • o 16m @ 2.54% Zn + Pb, 4.80 g/t Ag from 214m
        • o and 1m @ 5.08% Zn + Pb, 10.4 g/t Ag at end of hole (234-235m)
  • Within this broad zone of Zn-Pb mineralisation, significant copper and silver returned:
    • o 4m @ 1.54% Cu with 6.10% Zn + Pb and 23.60 g/t Ag from 204m
  • The discovery of significant copper and silver in a northwest trending 1.7km long feeder fault zone at Chinook supports the interpretation of metal zonation within the Earaheedy Project area, with copper reflecting the "hotter" portion of the system
  • The potential for deeper large-scale Cu-Zn-Pb-Ag deposits below the extensive unconformity style mineralisation is high, underlining the Earaheedy Project's world class base metal credentials
  • Ongoing RC scoping drilling results at Chinook include:
    • 8m @ 3.67% Zn + Pb, 4.10 g/t Ag from 74m (EHRC297)
    • 8m @ 3.65% Zn + Pb, 8.03 g/t Ag from 128m (EHRC197)
    • 17m @ 2.91% Zn + Pb, 2.29 g/t Ag from 110m (EHRC206)
    • 5m @ 4.54% Zn + Pb, 4.24 g/t Ag from 110m (EHRC113)
    • 6m @ 3.48% Zn + Pb, 37.00 g/t Ag from 59m (EHRC159)
    • 5m @ 5.53% Zn + Pb, 3.56 g/t Ag from 79m (EHRC159)
  • Chinook's mineralised footprint is 4.1km along strike and 1.9km down dip and remains open in all directions

Navajoh Zn-Pb-Ag Prospect

  • Located 4km southeast of the recent Tonka Discovery, first pass drill scoping on a single traverse intersected significant flat lying, northeast dipping unconformity related Zn-Pb-Ag sulphide mineralisation similar to the Chinook and Tonka Prospects. The first round of RC drilling results include:
    • 5m @ 6.38% Zn + Pb, 6.3 g/t Ag from 123m (EHRC280)
    • 3m @ 6.15% Zn + Pb, 10.63 g/t Ag from 132m (EHRC281A)
    • 4m @ 4.18% Zn + Pb, 3.57 g/t Ag from 106m (EHRC291)
    • 9m @ 2.75% Zn + Pb, 2.71 g/t Ag from 157m (EHRC285)

Earaheedy Project - Potential World Class Base Metal System

Since the Chinook discovery in April 2021, scoping drilling has significantly increased the overall metal budget and delineated multiple styles of mineralisation within the small portion of the Earaheedy Project that has been tested. The recent discoveries of Tonka and the Major Feeder Fault Zone at Chinook, encouraging first pass results at the Navajoh Prospect, have once again highlighted the world class potential of this Zn-Pb-Ag-Mn-Cu epigenetic base metal system

Rumble Resources Ltd

Level 1, 16 Ord Street, West Perth, WA 6005

T +61 8 6555 3980

F +61 8 6555 3981

rumbleresources.com.au

ASX RTR

Executives & Management

Mr Shane Sikora Managing Director

Mr Brett Keillor Technical Director

Mr Matthew Banks Non-executive Director

Mr Michael Smith Non-executive Director

Mr Peter Venn Non-executive Director

Mr Steven Wood Company Secretary

Rumble Resources Limited (ASX: RTR) ("Rumble" or "the Company") is pleased to announce that the ongoing scoping drilling at the Earaheedy Project has discovered a major feeder fault zone with very significant zinc-lead-silver mineralisation along with strong copper mineralisation at the Chinook Prospect. Additionally, the first round of drilling at the Navajoh Prospect has delineated significant flat lying unconformity style zinc-lead-silver mineralisation similar to the Chinook and Tonka discoveries.

Rumble Resources' Technical Director Mr Brett Keillor said:

"The discovery of significant copper (>1%) with silver mineralisation at the top of a major feeder fault system along with high grade zinc and lead (up to 17.1% Zn + Pb (EHRC136)) at Chinook highlights the potential for a very largescale zoned base metal system. The copper mineralisation supports the evolving geology and ore deposition model (see image 8) with respect to feeder fault zones reflecting higher depositional temperatures.

"Ultimately, the flat lying regionally extensive unconformity related zinc-lead-silver (manganese) mineralisation that Rumble has delineated at the Chinook, Tonka and now Navajoh Prospects potentially represents the large outer metal halo zone(s) of a world class base metal system that lies within the Earaheedy Project and underlying geological formations."

Image 1 – Earaheedy Project – Geology and Prospect Location Plan

Chinook Zn-Pb-Ag-Mn-Cu Prospect – Major Feeder Fault Discovery

Ongoing scoping drilling at Chinook has delineated the top of a large-scale sub-vertical feeder fault close to the Lockeridge Fault System. EHRC136 intersected a broad zone of mineralisation (84m @ 1.84% Zn + Pb from 151m – mineralised section) which returned multiple intersections:

  • 37m @ 3.25% Zn + Pb, 7.18 g/t Ag from 196m
    • o inc 10m @ 6.57% Zn + Pb, 16.24 g/t Ag from 200m
      • with 1m @ 17.1% Zn + Pb, 20.9 g/t Ag from 202m; and
      • with 4m @ 1.54% Cu, 6.1% Zn + Pb, 23.6 g/t Ag from 204m
    • o inc 16m @ 2.54% Zn + Pb, 4.80 g/t Ag from 214m
    • o inc 1m @ 5.08% Zn + Pb, 10.4 g/t Ag from 234 to End of Hole

Image 2 – Chinook East Drill Hole Plan – Drill Hole Locations and Intersections

Drill hole EHRC136 is the first hole to intersect highly significant >1% copper in association with zinc, lead and silver mineralisation. The copper mineralisation is chalcopyrite and chalcocite. The major feeder fault mineralised zone trends northwest (sub-parallel to the Lockeridge Fault) and has been interpreted to have at least 1.7 km in strike (to date) and is completely open.

At least three (3) previous holes completed by Rumble were near misses as the drill scoping is 100m spaced holes on sections 500m and 200m apart, and include:

  • EHRC055 Broad mineralised zone of 72m @ 0.84% Zn + Pb from 24m to EOH (>1000ppm Zn + Pb)
    • o Including 6m @ 6.57% Zn + Pb, 16 g/t Ag from 69m
    • o Elevated copper, cobalt and arsenic
  • EHRC254 Broad mineralised zone of 53m @ 1.05% Zn + Pb from 27m (>1000ppm Zn + Pb)
    • o Including 3m @ 3.65% Zn + Pb, 16.2 g/t Ag from 45m
    • o Elevated copper, cobalt and arsenic
  • EHRC251 Broad mineralised zone of 77m @ 1.31% Zn + Pb from 44m (>1000ppm Zn + Pb)
    • o Including 17m @ 3.08% Zn + Pb from 72m
    • o With 70m @ 6.54 g/t Ag from 55m
    • o Elevated copper, cobalt and arsenic

See image 2 for the location of these holes.

The intersection of the major feeder fault zone and the mineralised unconformity shallows to the southeast along the plane of the feeder zone and likely surfaces underneath the lake system south and southeast of Chinook (see image 2).

Of great importance, the subvertical feeder zone is interpreted to traverse both the underlying Purple Shale (approximately 40 to 70m in thickness) and the Iroquois Carbonate Member (up to 280m in thickness). Both these lithological formations have potential for structurally controlled Cu-Zn-Pb-Ag deposits.

Sections AB and ABC highlight the mineralisation and underlying feeder fault zone (images 3 and 4).

Image 3 – Chinook Prospect – Section AB – Geology and Drill Hole Intersections and interpreted new major Feeder Fault Zone

Image 4 – Chinook Prospect – Section ABC – Geology and EHRC136 Assays

Image 5 – Chinook West Drill Hole Plan – Drill Hole Locations and Intersections

Image 6 – Chinook Prospect – Location of East and West Plans

Chinook Prospect – Ongoing Scoping Drilling – E69/3464

Ongoing RC drilling at Chinook have recently focused on scoping the up-dip position to the northwest and west limits of granted tenement E69/3464 and the down dip position to the southeast end of the mineralised unconformity – See image 2. Latest results include:

  • 5m @ 4.54% Zn + Pb, 4.24 g/t Ag from 110m (EHRC113)¹
  • 6m @ 3.48% Zn + Pb, 37.00 g/t Ag from 59m and 5m @ 5.53% Zn + Pb, 3.56 g/t Ag from 79m (EHRC159)
  • 8m @ 3.67% Zn + Pb, 4.10 g/t Ag from 74m (EHRC297)
  • 8m @ 3.65% Zn + Pb, 8.03 g/t Ag from 128m (EHRC197)
  • 17m @ 2.91% Zn + Pb, 2.29 g/t Ag from 110m (EHRC206)

¹ Down hole length intersection – all other intersections are True Width

Upon the grant of Rumble's 100% owned contiguous exploration license ELA 69/3787, drilling is planned northwest and west along strike from E69/3464 towards to the Sweetwater Prospect opening up a further 12kms of strike – see images 1 & 9.

Diamond core drilling has commenced at both Chinook and the recent discovery at Tonka, with the aim of delineating the structural and geological controls of both the flat northeast dipping unconformity related and potential high angle feeder fault zones.

Navajoh Zn-Pb-Ag Prospect

The Navajoh Prospect is located 4kms southeast from the recent Tonka Zn-Pb-Ag Discovery (refer ASX announcement 13 December 2021 - initial footprint of 1.7km strike and 1km down dip length), see image 7.

First pass drill scoping of the Navajoh Zn-Pb-Ag Prospect on a single section intersected significant Zn-Pb-Ag mineralisation of similar style to the flat lying shallow northeast dipping unconformity related Zn-Pb-Ag mineralisation to the Chinook and Tonka discoveries.

Similar to the Chinook and Tonka discoveries, the mineralisation is open in all directions and has the potential to significantly increase its flat lying mineralised dimensions in all directions

The main drill section at Navajoh (approximately 5 drill hole results pending – see image 7) returned significant results including:

  • 5m @ 6.38% Zn + Pb, 6.30 g/t Ag from 123m (EHRC280)⃰
  • 3m @ 6.15% Zn + Pb, 10.63 g/t Ag from 132m (EHRC281A)⃰
  • 15m @ 2.09% Zn + Pb, 2.84 g/t Ag from 105m (EHRC291)⃰
    • o Inc 4m @ 4.18% Zn + Pb, 3.57 g/t Ag from 106m
  • 17m @ 2.06% Zn + Pb, 2.07 g/t Ag from 157m (EHRC285)⃰
    • o Inc 9m @ 2.75% Zn + Pb, 2.71 g/t Ag from 157m

*intersections are True Width

Other Drilling

Between Chinook and Tonka, some 8km of prospective strike has only been partly tested on 500m and 1500m drill section spacings. Significant areas of salt lakes have restricted some access, however, the geology and results received so far indicate the upper Navajoh Unconformity Unit has been partly stripped (eroded) in some areas due to faulting. Results to date reflect generally low grade Zn + Pb mineralisation (see Table 5 for locations and results).

Image 7 -Tonka, Magazine and Navajoh Prospect – Location Plan with Drill Hole Locations and Results

Earaheedy Project - A World Class Base Metal System

As the footprint of the Earaheedy Zn-Pb-Ag-Mn system expands, new styles of mineralisation are being discovered. With the delineation of significant copper mineralisation at Chinook, sericite alteration has been noted which indicates an increase in the metal deposition temperature near and proximal to the feeder faults. Silver is also increasing with cobalt and arsenic being elevated.

The presence of significant copper emphasises the metal zonation that is characteristic of large-scale base metal systems and implies the extensive zinc-lead-silver-manganese mineralisation defined by Rumble to date is the proximal metal zone to a potentially deeper Cu – Zn – Pb – Ag source.

Image 8 – Earaheedy Project - Model of Multiple Mineralisation Styles and targets at Earaheedy

Exploration to the south of the Earaheedy Project area by Strickland Metals has reported significant Zn-Pb-Ag-Mn mineralisation with assays including 23m @ 5.5% Zn + Pb in the Iroquois Carbonate Member at the Iroquois Zn-Pb-Mn Prospect – see image 1 for location (not owned by Rumble - refer ASX announcement by Strickland Metals (ASX: STK) on 14 October 2021). The drilling has demonstrated the lower Iroquois Carbonate Member is very prospective for MVT (Mississippi Valley Type) high-grade Zn-Pb-Ag lodes in association with basement/footwall feeder faults.

Within the Earaheedy Project area, the top of the Iroquois Carbonate Formation has been intersected below the footwall shale by recent drilling (assays pending) by Rumble. At this stage the drilling by Rumble has not targeted MVT style mineralisation. Based on the depth to the top of the Iroquois Carbonate Formation below the recent Rumble drilling at Chinook, Tonka, Magazine and Navajoh, the Iroquois Carbonate Formation is interpreted to hit the surface 2km to 5km (under recent cover) to the south and southwest of the highly prospective unconformity position (see images 1 and 8) and within ELA 69/3787**.**

Ongoing Exploration Steps

Exploration program for 2021:

The ongoing drilling program has now been expanded to over 50,000m, primarily to further drill and scope the Tonka discovery zone. The drilling is nearing completion for the 2021 season with this announcement reporting on the results of ninety (90) holes for 13959 metres. Assay results returned for the current program is now for 28,144m of drilling (approximately 56% of the planned drilling). The final sets of drilling results are expected by February-March next year.

Exploration program for 2022:

  • Diamond core drilling
    • o Further testing of the major 1.7km long feeder fault zone intersected at Chinook
    • o Confirm structural information regarding inferred feeder faults
    • o Provide further support for the interpretation of large-scale metal zonation within the Project area.
    • o Collect material for sighter metallurgical test-work
  • RC Drilling
    • o Further scoping of Chinook, Tonka, Magazine and Navajoh to define the limits of mineralisation and infill within the discovery areas - E69/3464
    • o Drill scoping of Rumble's 100% owned contiguous exploration license ELA 69/3787 (subject to grant).
  • Sonic drilling
    • o Superior recoveries recorded in Sonic holes EHS001 and EHS002 compared to diamond drilling within the Navajoh Unconformity Unit (NUU) has supported the Company's decision to restart the Sonic program in 2022. This material will be utilised in further metallurgical test work.
    • o Sonic drilling will also be used to test all areas of oxide mineralisation.
  • Metallurgy
    • o Initial sighter test work has commenced
  • Geophysics
    • o Airborne magnetics planned over application areas
    • o Analysis and testing of gravity and passive seismic is ongoing

About the Earaheedy Project

The Earaheedy Project is located approximately 110km northeast of Wiluna, Western Australia. Rumble owns 75% of E69/3464 and Zenith Minerals Ltd (ASX: ZNC) owns 25%. Rumble has applied (100%) for two contiguous exploration licenses ELA69/3787 and ELA69/3862, south and west of E69/3464. The entire project area covers the inferred unconformity contact between the overlying Frere Iron Formation and underlying Yelma Formation of the Palaeoproterozoic Earaheedy Basin. In April 2021 Rumble announced a major Zinc-Lead Discovery with 'Tier 1' deposit potential at the Earaheedy Project (see ASX Announcement 19 April 2021) and followed this up by announcing a Large Sedex Style System Emerging at the Earaheedy Project (see ASX announcement 25 May 2021) on E69/3464. There are now four main prospects within E69/3464, Chinook, Tonka, Magazine and Navajoh which lie along a 17km corridor which is open into the adjacent exploration license applications (ELA69/3787 and ELA69/3862). Within the project area, Rumble controls 45km of prospective mineralised strike which has the potential for multiple large tonnage Zn–Pb-Ag-Cu deposits - See image 1.

Image 9 - Project Location Plan and Regional Geology

First Stage Exploration Target

Rumble's Zn-Pb exploration target at the Earaheedy Project is between 100 to 120 million tonnes at a grade ranging between 3.5% Zn-Pb to 4.5% Zn-Pb Sulphide. The exploration target is at a shallow depth (120m), and over 40kms of prospective strike (completely open) has been defined within the Earaheedy Project. The potential quantity and grade of the exploration target is conceptual in nature, there has been insufficient exploration to estimate a Mineral Resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the estimation of a Mineral Resource. The exploration target, being conceptual in nature, takes no account of geological complexity, possible mining method or metallurgical recovery factors. The exploration target has been estimated in order to provide an assessment of the potential for large-scale Zn-Pb deposits within the Earaheedy Project. The exploration target has been prepared and reported in accordance with the 2012 edition of the JORC Code.

Earaheedy Zn-Pb Project –Exploration Target
Range Tonnes Grade
Lower 100,000,000 3.5% Zn + Pb Sulphide
Upper 120,000,000 4.5% Zn + Pb Sulphide

Table 1: Near surface exploration target down to 120 metre - shallow depth

The potential quantity and grade of the exploration target is conceptual in nature. There has been insufficient exploration to estimate a Mineral Resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the estimation of a Mineral Resource. The exploration target is based on the current geological understanding of the mineralisation geometry, continuity of mineralisation and regional geology. This understanding is provided by an extensive drill hole database, regional mapping, coupled with understanding of the host stratigraphic sequence.

Included in the data on which this exploration target has been prepared from some 50,000m of drilling completed by Rumble. Historic drilling includes sixty-four (64) holes completed within the project area (E69/3464) by previous explorers (refer historical exploration results in previous ASX announcements dated 5 February 2019 and 12 October 2017, 23rd January 2020 which continue to apply and have not materially changed). Some of the considerations in respect of the estimation of the exploration target include:

  • Drilling results have demonstrated strong continuity of shallow, flat lying sulphide mineralisation;
  • Over 45km's of prospective strike and open (refer image 1);
  • Minimum 600m of width based on shallow 7.5° and shallow depth to 120m, based on drilling results;
  • True width (thickness) of mineralisation up to 34 metres received in drilling results; and
  • Specific gravity (SG) of 2.5 (world average SG of sandstone not accounting for metal).

The Company intends to test the exploration target with drilling and this further drilling is expected to extend over approximately 12 months. Grade ranges have been either estimated or assigned from lower and upper grades of mineralisation received in drilling results. A classification is not applicable for an exploration target.

Authorisation

This announcement is authorised for release by Shane Sikora, Managing Director of the Company.

-Ends-

For further information visit rumbleresources.com.au or contact [email protected].

Previous Drill Results

Drill hole results are ongoing and previous assays have been reported in earlier ASX announcements.

  • ASX Release 23/8/2019 14 High Priority Targets and New Mineralisation Style
  • ASX Release 23/1/2020 Large Scale Zn-Pb-Ag Discoveries at Earaheedy
  • ASX Release 19/4/2021 Major Zinc-Lead Discovery at Earaheedy Project, Western Australia
  • ASX Release 2/6/2021 Large Scale Zinc-Lead-Silver SEDEX Style System Emerging at Earaheedy
  • ASX Release 8/7/2021 Broad Spaced Scout Drilling Has Significantly Increased the Zn-Pb-Ag-Mn footprint at Earaheedy
  • ASX Release 23/8/2021 Earaheedy Zn-Pb-Ag-Mn Project Exploration Update
  • ASX Release 13/12/2021 New Zinc-Lead-Silver Discovery at Earaheedy Project

About Rumble Resources Ltd

Rumble Resources Ltd is an Australian based exploration company, officially admitted to the ASX on the 1st July 2011. Rumble was established with the aim of adding significant value to its current mineral exploration assets and will continue to look at mineral acquisition opportunities both in Australia and abroad.

Competent Persons Statement

The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results and Exploration Targets is based on and fairly represents information compiled by Mr Brett Keillor, who is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining & Metallurgy and the Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Mr Keillor is an employee of Rumble Resources Limited. Mr Keillor has sufficient experience relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the "Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves". Mr Keillor consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

Previously Reported Information

The information in this report that references previously reported exploration results is extracted from the Company's ASX market announcements released on the date noted in the body of the text where that reference appears. The previous market announcements are available to view on the Company's website or on the ASX website (www. asx.com.au). The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original market announcements. The Company confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person's findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original market announcements.

Disclaimer

This report contains certain forward-looking statements and forecasts, including possible or assumed reserves and resources, production levels and rates, costs, prices, future performance or potential growth of Rumble Resources Ltd, industry growth or other trend projections. Such statements are not a guarantee of future performance and involve unknown risks and uncertainties, as well as other factors which are beyond the control of Rumble Resources Ltd. Actual results and developments may differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward looking statements depending on a variety of factors. Nothing in this report should be construed as either an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell securities. This document has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Australian securities laws, which may differ from the requirements of United States and other country securities laws. Unless otherwise indicated, all ore reserve and mineral resource estimates included or incorporated by reference in this document have been, and will be, prepared in accordance with the JORC classification system of the Australasian Institute of Mining, and Metallurgy and Australian Institute of Geoscientists.

Table 2.
Chinook Prospect Drill Hole Locations and Assay Results (>2% Zn + Pb – Green)
Hole ID E(MGA) N(MGA) Depth (m) Dip Azi Depth From Thickness (m) Zn% Pb% S % Ag g/t Zn + Pb % Cu %
EHRC095 250580 7166738 154 -90 130 20 1.1 0.28 3.4 2 1.38
inc 130 2 2.81 0.65 5.9 4.3 3.46
EHRC096 250616 7166968 179 -90 139 39 0.91 0.2 3.45 1.42 1.11
inc 142 1 1.53 0.47 1.86 2 2
inc 144 1 1.27 1.19 4.82 4.7 2.46
EHRC110 253296 7165947 174 -60 inc30 151140 112 2.980.3 0.390.37 7.60.11 2.4 3.370.67
EHRC111 253241 7165861 205 -60 30 163 15 0.57 0.24 3 2.77 0.81
inc 166 1 2.27 0.73 9.1 8 3
EHRC112 253186 7165775 189 -60 30 113 46 0.61 0.31 1.58 1.68 0.92
inc 121 3 2.47 1.39 2.46 4.4 3.86
inc 140 1 1.89 0.25 3.33 2.6 2.14
EHRC113 253132 7165689 174 -60 30 106 10 2.45 0.33 1.48 6.42 2.78
inc 110 5 4.22 0.3 0.8 4.24 4.54
and 132 13 0.75 0.1 2.26 1.54 0.85
EHRC086AEHRC159 253415252718 71664887165640 204114 -90-90 15756 1014 0.541.39 0.50.47 1.563 2.116.2 1.041.86
inc 59 6 2.51 0.97 6.62 37 3.48
and 75 19 1.79 0.16 0.24 1.7 1.95
inc 79 5 5.14 0.39 0.24 3.16 5.53
and 92 2 1.06 0.07 0.27 0.5 1.13
EHRC295 252792 7165627 84 -90 55 17 0.85 0.29 0.23 5.75 1.14
EHRC297 252906 7165626 150 -90 64 26 1.37 0.5 2.21 3.43 1.87
inc 74 8 2.75 0.92 3.42 4.1 3.67
EHRC238 253415 7165338 132 -90 94 2 0.39 0.25 0.17 0.7 0.64
EHRC196 252375 7166049 160 -90 115 14 0.29 0.65 4.84 6.34 0.94
EHRC239 253478 7165414 138 -90 and 6283 1212 0.430.72 0.250.23 0.882.28 2.332.36 0.680.95
EHRC226 252773 7166095 170 -90 141 3 0.32 0.8 6.34 5.5 1.12
EHRC197 252428 7166140 177 -90 128 16 0.49 2.12 8.16 5.8 2.61
inc 128 8 2.97 0.68 11.84 8.03 3.65
inc 138 2 2.5 0.44 5.58 4.55 2.94
EHRC153 251153 7166715 174 -90 153 6 0.93 0.21 3.6 1.5 1.14
EHRC154 250644 7166834 174 -90 141 15 1.73 0.36 3.92 1.93 2.09
inc 142 2 2.82 0.27 4.06 2.4 3.09
inc 146 5 2.32 0.62 6.69 3.14 2.94
and 161 3 0.61 0.07 3.64 1.4 0.68
EHRC221EHRC222 252496252554 71656737165754 9096 -90-90 54 18 0.46 0.35 0.55 5.28 NSR0.81
EHRC223 252602 7165837 114 -90 70 20 0.45 0.38 1.14 2.67 0.83
EHRC227 252443 7165584 78 -90 36 2 0.49 0.19 0.09 0.68
and 51 3 0.14 1.52 0.15 1.17 1.66
EHRC256 253935 7165028 108 -90 68 5 0.48 0.15 0.97 2.72 0.63
EHRC248 253985 7165115 108 -90 50 14 0.48 0.18 0.37 0.66
EHRC249 254043 2165200 126 -90 55 26 0.48 0.5 1.46 3.09 0.98
EHRC250 254097 7165293 140 -90 62 6 0.48 0.3 0.17 0.78
and 83 4 0.41 0.1 2.15 7.08 0.51
EHRC255EHRC252 254326254141 71652477164994 150108 -90-90 35 11 0.59 0.17 0.15 0.6 NSR0.76
and 54 2 0.52 0.14 0.13 1.35 0.66
EHRC253 254189 7165086 114 -90 35 19 0.54 0.23 0.13 0.77
and 60 5 0.89 0.16 2.71 2.92 1.05
and 74 6 0.59 0.07 0.78 0.66
EHRC254 254256 7165172 126 -90 27 53 0.6 0.55 1.42 4.62 1.05
inc 45 3 2.91 0.74 0.07 16.2 3.65
EHRC236 253301 7165144 102 -90 56 16 0.54 0.27 0.19 0.81
EHRC134 253107 7166038 192 -90 inc 129133 245 0.962.38 0.420.81 8.69 3.7717.07 6.26 1.383.19
EHRC135 253241 7166223 222 -90 181 15 0.29 0.33 2.67 1.76 0.62
EHRC136 253348 7166397 235 -90 170 6 1.67 0.41 3.7 3.6 2.08
inc 172 2 3.67 0.55 4.17 4.55 4.22
and 196 37 2.03 1.22 4.23 7.18 3.25
inc 200 10 3.17 3.41 8.52 16.24 6.57
inc 214 16 2.05 0.49 3.36 4.8 2.54
inc 234 to EOH 1 3.47 1.61 7.55 10.4 5.08
inc 204 4 2.94 3.16 13.48 23.6 6.1 1.54
EHRC335 253403 7164892 78 -90 36 21 0.56 0.85 2.01 4.16 1.41
EHRC206 251185 7166391 173 -90 inc 50110 419 2.352.13 1.030.58 5.57 8.48 17.353.13 3.382.71
inc 110 17 2.28 0.63 5.85 2.29 2.91
EHRC232 253256 7165496 128 -90 96 7 1.68 0.19 13.29 5.82 1.87
inc 96 4 2.3 0.22 12.58 5.53 2.52
and 107 1 1.33 0.21 6.72 3.1 1.54
EHRC233 253311 7165585 144 -90 89 1 0.81 1.08 2.53 3.7 1.89
Datum GDA94 Z51

Table 3.
Navajoh Prospect Drill Hole Locations and Assay Results
Hole ID E(MGA) N(MGA) Depth (m) Dip Azi Depth From Thickness (m) Zn% Pb% S % Ag g/t Zn + Pb %
EHRC277 264511 7157936 167 -90 89 6 0.85 0.77 2 2.35 1.62
EHRC278 264563 7158014 137 -90 NSR
EHRC279 264619 7158102 137 -90 98 8 0.26 0.26 0.18 1.6 0.52
EHRC280 264722 7158273 155 -90 122 6 3.3 2.17 2.63 5.8 5.47
inc 123 5 3.86 2.52 3 6.3 6.38
EHRC281 264773 7158359 135 -90 129 6 1.62 0.45 2.18 2.7 2.07
inc 129 2 2.28 0.54 2.28 2.45 2.82
EHRC284 265071 7158568 172 -90 150 9 1.36 0.16 1.33 2.18 1.52
inc 150 3 3 0.37 2.48 2.77 3.37
EHRC269 263828 7158547 158 -90 91 5 1.12 0.08 1.35 2 1.3
EHRC282 264826 7158441 167 -90 137 6 0.93 0.77 1.72 3.57 1.7
EHRC281A 264764 7158355 173 -90 130 8 1.63 1.12 1.79 5.43 2.75
inc 132 3 3.69 2.46 3.72 10.63 6.15
EHRC286 265280 7158681 180 -90 175 5 0.92 0.08 1.23 1.9 1
EHRC291 264670 7158190 155 -90 105 15 1.75 0.34 2.41 2.84 2.09
inc 106 3 3.82 0.36 3.7 3.57 4.18
inc 115 3 2.16 0.75 2.96 4.33 2.91
EHRC285 265186 7158621 178 -90 157 17 1.81 0.25 1.76 2.07 2.06
inc 157 9 2.39 0.36 2.29 2.71 2.75
EHRC271 263953 7158681 137 -90 NSR

Table 4 Regional Drill Hole Locations and Assay Results

Hole ID E(MGA) N(MGA) Depth (m) Dip Azi Depth From Thickness (m) Zn% Pb% S % Ag g/t Zn + Pb %
EHRC122 257716 7163905 161 -90 NSR
EHRC123 257825 7164073 167 -90 75 2 0.82 0.07 0.85 0.55 0.89
EHRC114 255146 7165404 130 -90 46 12 0.32 0.37 0.18 0.69
EHRC116 255359 7165747 132 -90 NSR
EHRC115 255251 7165577 144 -90 105 28 0.6 0.19 0.62 3.7 0.79
EHRC117 255656 7165242 160 -90 104 22 0.74 0.12 0.96 0.8 0.86
EHRC119 255965 7165745 180 -90 NSR
EHRC118 255774 7165440 193 -90 184 3 0.88 0.02 0.9 0.9
EHRC147 258558 7163243 119 -90 67 1 0.92 0.04 2.84 0.5 0.96
and 77 1 1.33 0.03 4.15 0.5 1.36
EHRC146 258454 7163077 245 -90 NSR
EHRC148 258670 7163425 137 -90 NSR
EHRC149 258768 7163587 160 -90 NSR
EHRC150 258879 7163754 173 -90 NSR
EHRC161 258991 7163927 165 -90 NSR
EHRC162 259101 7164098 227 -90 NSR
EHRC130 258026 7164419 221 -90 NSR
EHRC165 257913 7163212 167 -90 NSR
EHRC166 258025 7163386 119 -90 NSR
EHRC167 258121 7163555 137 -90 74 2 0.87 0.2 7.07 2.95 1.07
EHRC168 258228 7163724 161 -90 83 22 0.87 0.17 3.84 1.5 1.04
inc 100 2 2.12 0.34 5.09 3.3 2.46
EHRC169 258329 7163905 143 -90 118 2 0.28 0.25 0.51 1.15 0.53
and 133 1 0.77 0.22 7.88 3.8 0.99
EHRC177 259118 7162247 149 -90 NSR
EHRC179 259319 7162569 131 -90 NSR

Table 5 EHRC136 Assay Results

HoleID From_m To_m Ag g/t As_ppm Ba_ppm Cd_ppm Co_ppm Cu_ppm Fe % Mn_ppm Pb_ppm S % Zn_ppm Pb+Zn %
EHRC136 151 152 5.5 219 140 14.4 42 813 7.33 70 5900 7.11 4070 1.00
EHRC136 152 153 5.8 231 150 13.7 45 732 7.7 59 5380 7.51 3470 0.89
EHRC136 153 154 4.2 608 120 4.2 83 757 8.84 52 7080 9.44 1085 0.82
EHRC136EHRC136 154155 155156 6.66.5 664332 180140 39.565.4 13066 70901720 4.68.42 7765 38307760 4.599.35 251010250 0.631.80
EHRC136 157 158 3.7 151 320 10.4 25 689 7.03 80 2620 3.47 1645 0.43
EHRC136 158 159 3.2 107 430 5.1 19 555 10.3 107 2450 1.62 895 0.33
EHRC136 159 160 1.7 103 370 5.3 13 487 12.25 138 1600 1.3 934 0.25
EHRC136 160 161 1.9 136 470 4.2 14 498 17.7 132 1720 1.51 1045 0.28
EHRC136 161 162 3.8 163 320 2 26 586 12.2 97 2070 3.51 691 0.28
EHRC136EHRC136 162163 163164 1.32.1 179122 400240 1.30.8 1116 367581 24.828.5 159137 12201330 0.721.42 897894 0.210.22
EHRC136 164 165 2.2 256 170 4 46 296 31.1 18200 772 1.64 1455 0.22
EHRC136 165 166 2.2 159 190 3.9 41 262 32.6 17800 915 1.37 1220 0.21
EHRC136 166 167 2.5 162 220 4.6 42 312 29.2 14850 1240 1.61 1345 0.26
EHRC136 167 168 2.7 231 290 4.3 41 465 24.6 6510 1730 2.24 1565 0.33
EHRC136 168 169 2.5 211 330 5.2 29 445 20.6 2490 2580 2.43 1820 0.44
EHRC136EHRC136 169170 170171 2.43.8 195448 400230 45.9 3052 339216 15.859.03 3110966 17703720 1.814.13 14751455 0.320.52
EHRC136 171 172 4.7 403 190 21 67 206 12.05 1210 4430 5.77 7130 1.16
EHRC136 172 173 4.9 376 270 93.8 99 130 9.74 2120 5770 4.6 36700 4.25
EHRC136 173 174 4.2 232 430 93.9 68 104 12.8 4140 5310 3.74 36600 4.19
EHRC136 174 175 3 256 440 32.4 50 161 18.25 1560 3510 2.81 13600 1.71
EHRC136 175 176 1 174 650 7 26 115 23.6 618 1850 1.12 4590 0.64
EHRC136EHRC136 176177 177178 0.90.8 131129 810830 5.75.2 2321 9295 15.914.7 997976 15001400 0.90.88 34503130 0.500.45
EHRC136 178 179 0.9 170 600 4.6 68 82 14.2 12500 1540 1.04 4000 0.55
EHRC136 179 180 0.6 199 640 3.4 74 36 12.2 10800 1580 0.83 3310 0.49
EHRC136 180 181 0.8 229 540 4.2 62 48 13.45 12000 1530 1.12 3780 0.53
EHRC136 181 182 0.8 178 770 3.1 21 103 6.84 2690 1030 1.2 1345 0.24
EHRC136EHRC136 182183 183184 0.90.5 9262 870510 2.8 3249 2720 9.1417.35 654013900 922849 0.720.56 15253940 0.240.48
EHRC136 184 185 0.5 86 720 4.51.3 23 109 13.05 1510 1080 0.42 1830 0.29
EHRC136 185 186 0.5 81 630 0.8 21 90 14.95 1520 1070 0.4 2120 0.32
EHRC136 186 187 0.6 52 480 0.8 14 132 8.72 545 666 0.31 1160 0.18
EHRC136 187 188 0.5 61 470 1.2 15 76 6.8 553 689 0.48 1020 0.17
EHRC136 188 189 0.5 77 570 1 20 54 4.19 282 664 0.71 517 0.12
EHRC136EHRC136 189190 190191 0.50.5 7085 460640 0.80.9 1622 5366 4.784.58 304249 496620 0.540.7 589497 0.110.11
EHRC136 191 192 0.5 79 580 0.6 20 63 5.48 207 588 0.64 602 0.12
EHRC136 192 193 0.5 104 560 0.6 18 67 6.72 488 564 0.54 790 0.14
EHRC136 193 195 0.5 102 490 0.5 14 74 6.9 338 537 0.43 832 0.14
EHRC136 195 196 0.5 88 440 1.2 13 55 5.06 845 806 0.5 660 0.15
EHRC136 196 197 1 53 320 13.6 7 66 5.73 218 1260 0.46 5370 0.66
EHRC136EHRC136 198200 199201 2.47.1 150181 350440 9.639.8 925 110233 8.595.78 129165 265027300 0.52.11 416013150 0.684.05
EHRC136 201 202 10.1 193 710 51.5 44 326 6.12 177 43400 2.94 15950 5.94
EHRC136 202 203 20.9 151 270 244 36 249 5.52 136 77700 6.96 93300 17.10
EHRC136 203 204 11.1 173 590 82 36 294 6.52 372 47900 3.42 29900 7.78
EHRC136 204 205 24.1 945 140 104 307 23200 21.6 23000 28800 10.2 27000 5.58
EHRC136EHRC136 205206 206207 27.624.8 12251805 120130 134122 321630 1865012900 2212.15 107506790 3400030300 20.89.55 4000016100 7.404.64
EHRC136 207 208 17.9 654 110 96.5 149 6550 13.65 3580 33400 13.35 34600 6.80
EHRC136 208 209 8.5 328 70 54.5 68 3810 7.47 2770 7070 7.21 20500 2.76
EHRC136 209 210 10.3 384 50 65.8 70 3940 8.6 2600 10750 8.63 26200 3.70
EHRC136 210 211 3.5 155 70 22.2 35 1120 4.39 2430 3370 2.61 8430 1.18
EHRC136EHRC136 211212 212213 2.62.1 8082 3070 16.817.7 1722 924739 2.692.3 26302100 19901810 1.851.96 65506830 0.850.86
EHRC136 213 214 1.8 60 70 18.2 188 461 2.68 2350 1610 1.35 7300 0.89
EHRC136 214 215 5.6 135 50 42.8 27 1320 3.63 1645 4620 3.97 17300 2.19
EHRC136 215 216 7.4 218 90 66.9 45 1910 5.13 2340 8890 4.97 27300 3.62
EHRC136 216 217 5.5 170 60 46.7 37 1560 4.46 2010 5990 4.33 18600 2.46
EHRC136EHRC136 217218 218219 4.13 11679 8060 39.131.3 2720 967481 3.613.08 19701785 40202260 3.542.98 1575012650 1.981.49
EHRC136 219 220 4.6 172 80 49.5 30 799 4.53 2060 4030 4.3 19600 2.36
EHRC136 220 221 6.1 120 90 81.1 23 710 4.66 1610 5410 4.22 32000 3.74
EHRC136 221 222 8.4 195 120 82.1 37 1580 5.53 1350 9750 5.16 32800 4.26
EHRC136 222 223 5.5 136 100 61.9 25 1030 3.81 1900 5630 3.39 24700 3.03
EHRC136 223 224 4.4 88 120 53.7 18 526 3.81 2150 3990 2.82 21100 2.51
EHRC136EHRC136 224225 225226 3.32.7 5950 9090 43.137.9 1416 356235 3.123.22 21902000 36202810 21.84 1685014850 2.051.77
EHRC136 226 227 3.6 56 120 42.1 15 249 3.08 1430 4120 1.89 16950 2.11
EHRC136 227 228 3 54 140 43.3 13 240 2.79 1330 3930 1.66 16650 2.06
EHRC136 228 229 1.9 36 100 30.8 11 98 2.87 1870 2350 1.51 12400 1.48
EHRC136 229 230 3.2 54 130 47.1 13 165 3.46 2030 3700 1.8 17000 2.07
EHRC136 230 231 2.3 59 140 30.7 13 156 2.3 1260 2840 1.4 12050 1.49
EHRC136EHRC136 231232 232233 1.30.9 4930 120100 2418.3 138 11180 2.362.16 19802320 19201340 1.070.75 97107450 1.160.88
EHRC136 233 234 2.8 56 140 36.9 12 163 3.24 1610 3540 1.55 14250 1.78
EHRC136 234 235 10.4 365 140 86.1 75 2620 8.31 1310 16100 7.55 34700 5.08

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Samplingtechniques •Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels,random chips, or specific specialised industry standardmeasurement tools appropriate to the minerals underinvestigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, orhandheld XRF instruments, etc.). These examplesshould not be taken as limiting the broad meaning ofsampling.•Include reference to measures taken to ensure samplerepresentivity and the appropriate calibration of anymeasurement tools or systems used.•Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that areMaterial to the Public Report.•In cases where 'industry standard' work has been donethis would be relatively simple (e.g. 'reverse circulationdrilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fireassay'). In other cases more explanation may berequired, such as where there is coarse gold that hasinherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities ormineralisation types (e.g. submarine nodules) maywarrant disclosure of detailed information. •RC sampling completed on 1mintervals using Metzke Static conesplitter is dry. If wet, sample collectedin large polywoven, then allowed todry for 24 hrs. Sampling was byspear along inside of bag.•Weight of sample was on average>2kg.Samples sent to ALS, Malaga, Perth,•WA and are being assayed using afour acid digest and read by ICP-AESanalytical instrument. At total of 33elements are reported including Ag,Al, As, Ba, Bi, Ca, Cd, Ce, Co, Cr,Cu, Fe, K, La, Li, Mg, Mn, Mo, Na, Ni,P, Pb, S, Sb, Sc, Sr, Th, Ti, Tl, U, V,W, Zn.
Drillingtechniques •Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open-holehammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc.)and details (e.g. core diameter, triple or standard tube,depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type,whether core is oriented and if so, by what method,etc.) •RC face hammer sampling (5.5indiameter). Rig used was an AtlasCopco 220 with 1250cfm air and435psi compressor.
Drill samplerecovery •Method of recording and assessing core and chipsample recoveries and results assessed.•Measures taken to maximise sample recovery andensure representative nature of the samples.•Whether a relationship exists between sample recoveryand grade and whether sample bias may haveoccurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarsematerial. •RC drilling cuttings were collected as1 metre intervals with correspondingchip tray interval kept for reference.•In general the dry sample versus thewet sample weight did not vary as thewet sample was collected in apolyweave bag which allowed excesswater to seep and kept the drillcutting fines intact in the bag.
Logging •Whether core and chip samples have been geologicallyand geotechnically logged to a level of detail to supportappropriate Mineral Resource estimation, miningstudies and metallurgical studies.•Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature.Core (or costean, channel, etc.) photography.•The total length and percentage of the relevantintersections logged. •Each metre was geologically loggedwith pXRF analysis.•All drill cuttings logged.
Subsamplingtechniquesand samplepreparation •If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, halfor all core taken.•If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split,etc. and whether sampled wet or dry.•For all sample types, the nature, quality andappropriateness of the sample preparation technique.•Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-samplingstages to maximise representivity of samples.•Measures taken to ensure that the sampling isrepresentative of the in situ material collected,including for instance results for field duplicate/secondhalf sampling.•Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain •RC Drilling as belowoEach metre was analysed by aVanta pXRF. The Vanta usedstandards (CRM).oIf the assay response was>1000ppm Zn, a sample (>2kg)was taken and delivered to ALS forwet analysis.oSampling QA/QC involved aduplicate taken every 20m, and astandard taken every 20m. 4standards (OREAS CRMs) levelsand one blank were usedrandomly.
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
size of the material being sampled.
Qualityofassaydataandlaboratorytests •The nature, quality and appropriateness of theassaying and laboratory procedures used and whetherthe technique is considered partial or total.•For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRFinstruments, etc., the parameters used in determiningthe analysis including instrument make and model,reading times, calibrations factors applied and theirderivation, etc.•Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g.standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratorychecks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (i.e.lack of bias) and precision have been established. •The assigned assaying methodology(4 acid) is total digest.•Asdiscussed,theVantapXRFanalyser was used to threshold thecollection of samples for wet analysis.•InadditiontoRumblesQA/QCmethods (duplicates, standards andblanks), the laboratory has additionalchecks.
Verificationof samplingandassayingLocationofdata points •The verification of significant intersections by eitherindependent or alternative company personnel.•The use of twinned holes.•Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures,data verification, data storage (physical and electronic)protocols.•Discuss any adjustment to assay data.•Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drillholes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mineworkings and other locations used in Mineral Resourceestimation. •Significant intersections reported bycompany personnel only.•Documentation and review is ongoing.Prior to final vetting, entered intodatabase.•All drillhole collars surveyed usinghandheld GPS – Datum is MGA94Zone 51.
•Specification of the grid system used.•Quality and adequacy of topographic control.
Dataspacing anddistribution •Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.•Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficientto establish the degree of geological and gradecontinuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource andOre Reserve estimation procedure(s) andclassifications applied.•Whether sample compositing has been applied. •No resource work completed. TheRC drilling is reconnaissance(scoping) by nature with drill holespacing on average 500m x 100mapart.•Single metre and composites used.
Orientationofdatainrelationtogeologicalstructure •Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiasedsampling of possible structures and the extent to whichthis is known, considering the deposit type.•If the relationship between the drilling orientation andthe orientation of key mineralised structures isconsidered to have introduced a sampling bias, thisshould be assessed and reported if material. •Previous drilling (and historic) hasdefined a consistent flat lyingsedimentary package.•Drilling is normal (90°) to themineralised intersections. True widthreported. No bias.•A single traverse of angled RC holescompleted to ascertain if footwallstructures could be determined. Thesingle traverse was at -60 andrepresented approximately 85% oftrue width.
Samplesecurity •The measures taken to ensure sample security. All sampling packaging and security•completed by Rumble personnel,from collection of sample to deliveryat laboratory.
Auditsorreviews •The results of any audits or reviews of samplingtechniques and data. No audits completed.•

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Mineral
tenement Type, reference name/number, location and The Earaheedy Project comprises of
and ownership including agreements or material issues a granted exploration license –
land with third parties such as joint ventures, E69/3464 (75% Rumble and 25%
tenure partnerships, overriding royalties, native title Zenith Minerals) and one exploration
status interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park license application ELA69/3787

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
and environmental settings.•The security of the tenure held at the time ofreporting along with any known impediments toobtaining a licence to operate in the area. (100% Rumble)E69/3464 is in a state of good•standing and has no knownimpediments to operate in the area.
Explorationdone by otherparties •Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration byother parties. •Exploration solely completed byRumble Resources
Geology •Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. •The Earaheedy Project Deposit typeis unconformity related sandstonehosted Zn-Pb type. Also MVT(Mississippi Valley Type) to SEDEXstyle associated with carbonates hasbeen identified. Current work byRumble has identified unconformityrelated sandstone hosted Zn Pbtype.
DrillholeInformation •A summary of all information material to theunderstanding of the exploration results including atabulation of the following information for all Materialdrill holes:oeasting and northing of the drill hole collaroelevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevationabove sea level in metres) of the drill hole collarodip and azimuth of the holeodown hole length and interception depthohole length.•If the exclusion of this information is justified on thebasis that the information is not Material and thisexclusion does not detract from the understanding ofthe report, the Competent Person should clearlyexplain why this is the case. •Table 1 – Near surface explorationtarget down to 120 metre - shallowdepth•Table 2 – Chinook Prospect DrillHole Locations and Assay Results•Table 3 – Navajoh Prospect DrillHole Locations and Assay Results•Table 4 – Regional Drill HoleLocations and Assay Results•Table 5 – EHRC136 – Assay Results
Dataaggregationmethods •In reporting Exploration Results, weightingaveraging techniques, maximum and/orminimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of highgrades) and cut-off grades are usually Materialand should be stated.•Where aggregate intercepts incorporate shortlengths of high-grade results and longer lengthsof low-grade results, the procedure used forsuch aggregation should be stated and sometypical examples of such aggregations shouldbe shown in detail.•The assumptions used for any reporting ofmetal equivalent values should be clearlystated. •Historic drilling cut-off grades usedinclude:o0.5% Zno0.5% Zn + Pbo>0.1% Zn•The Zn:Pb ratio is variable over theproject area. On average the Zn:Pbratio for sulphide is 3. The averageZn:Pb ratio for oxide is 0.8.•Historic drilling – if diamond drillingor RC composite – weightedaverage used.
Relationshipbetweenmineralisationwidthsandinterceptlengths •These relationships are particularly important inthe reporting of Exploration Results.•If the geometry of the mineralisation withrespect to the drill hole angle is known, itsnature should be reported.•If it is not known and only the down hole lengthsare reported, there should be a clear statementto this effect (e.g. 'down hole length, true widthnot known'). •Drilling is vertical. Mineralisation isflat. Width of mineralisation is truewidth.•A single RC traverse was completedat -60. Intersection represents 85%of true width.
Diagrams •Appropriate maps and sections (with scales)and tabulations of intercepts should be includedfor any significant discovery being reportedThese should include, but not be limited to aplan view of drill hole collar locations andappropriate sectional views. •Image 1 –Earaheedy Project –Geology and Prospect Location Plan•Image 2 -Earaheedy Project –Geology and Prospect Location Plan
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
•Image 3 - Chinook Prospect – SectionAB–GeologyandDrillHoleIntersections•Image 4 –Chinook Prospect –SectionABC–GeologyandEHRC136 Assays
•Image 5 - Chinook West Drill HolePlan –Drill Hole Locations andIntersections
•Image 6 – Chinook Prospect –Location of East and West PlansImage 7-Tonka, Magazine and•Navajoh Prospect –Location Planwith Drill Hole Locations and Results•Image 8 - Earaheedy Project - Modelof Mineralisation Styles atEaraheedy•Image 9 - Project Location Plan andRegional Geology
Balancedreporting •Where comprehensive reporting of allExploration Results is not practicable,representative reporting of both low and highgrades and/or widths should be practiced toavoid misleading reporting of ExplorationResults. •Tables 2,3,4 and 5 represent all drillhole locations and significant assaysfor the current batch of RC drill holes
Othersubstantiveexplorationdata •Other exploration data, if meaningful andmaterial, should be reported including (but notlimited to): geological observations; geophysicalsurvey results; geochemical survey results; bulksamples – size and method of treatment;metallurgical test results; bulk density,groundwater, geotechnical and rockcharacteristics; potential deleterious orcontaminating substances. pXRF analyser is used only to•gauge >1000ppm Zn. If sample is>1000ppm Zn and/or within amineralised section, 1m RCsamples are sent for wet analysis (4acid digest multi-element)
Further work •The nature and scale of planned further work(e.g. tests for lateral extensions or depthextensions or large-scale step-out drilling).•Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas ofpossible extensions, including the maingeological interpretations and future drillingareas, provided this information is notcommercially sensitive. •Diamond core drilling commenced•RC drilling – Definition drilling ofChinook, Tonka and Navajoh•RC drilling – reconnaissance –scoping work