RUMBLE RESOURCES LIMITED — Capital/Financing Update 2022

Mar 8, 2022

9th March 2022

Major Expansion of Zn-Pb Mineralised Footprint at the Tonka- Navajoh Prospects - Earaheedy Project

Tonka-Navajoh Zn-Pb-Ag Trend – RC Drilling Results

• Located 8kms southeast of the Chinook Prospect, RC drilling has significantly increased the Tonka–Navajoh mineralised footprint to a strike of 8km and up to 1.4km in width. Zn-Pb mineralisation remains open to the northwest, southeast and downdip to the northeast
• The RC drilling (scoping on 500m sections) has now confirmed strong Zn-Pb grade continuity at both the Tonka and Navajoh Prospects with results including:

Tonka (includes Magazine) Prospect

• 20m @ 4.27% Zn + Pb, 3.71 g/t Ag from 112m (EHRC398) o Incl 8m @ 6.75% Zn + Pb, 5.2 g/t Ag from 117m
• 12m @ 4.41% Zn + Pb, 0.91 g/t Ag from 67m (EHRC320)
  • o Incl 6m @ 5.54% Zn + Pb, 1.13 g/t Ag from 72m
• 19m @ 1.88% Zn + Pb, 2.37 g/t Ag from 143m (EHRC400)
  • o Incl 5m @ 5.09% Zn + Pb, 5.12 g/t Ag from 143m

Navajoh Prospect

• 17m @ 4.79% Zn + Pb, 4.25 g/t Ag from 170m (EHRC287)
  • o Incl 4m @ 8.31% Zn + Pb, 5.38 g/t Ag from 170m and
  • o 7m @ 5.62% Zn + Pb, 5.3 g/t Ag from 179m
• 12m @ 4.48% Zn + Pb, 5.26 g/t Ag from 152m (EHRC419)
  • o Incl 6m @ 6.51% Zn + Pb, 7.1 g/t Ag from 152m
• 23m @ 2.45% Zn + Pb, 1.18 g/t Ag from 176m to EOH (EHRC290)
  • o Incl 3m @ 7.52% Zn + Pb, 1.89 g/t Ag from 181m
• 12m @ 3.47% Zn + Pb, 2.37 g/t Ag from 188m (EHRC289)
  • o Incl 3m @ 4.6% Zn + Pb, 3.03 g/t Ag from 190m

Drill-hole intersections are true width

Emerging World Class Base Metal System

• Initial litho-structural interpretation from airborne magnetics, gravity and drill hole logging suggests:
  • The Chinook-Tonka-Navajoh Zn-Pb-Ag mineralisation now occurs over a strike of 18km and is open to the northwest, west, southeast and down-dip to the northeast
  • At Chinook, the Kalitan Feeder Zone and other inferred higher-grade Zn-Pb feeder zones trend northwest which are the focus of the early 2022 drill campaign
  • At Tonka-Navajoh, multiple new inferred high-grade Zn-Pb feeder structures trend northeast

Next Stages at Tonka-Navajoh

• Further scoping and infill drilling on the 500m spaced drill sections
• Drill testing the recently interpreted northeast trending feeder structures with the focus on delineating new higher-grade Zn-Pb zones

Rumble Resources Ltd

Level 1, 16 Ord Street, West Perth, WA 6005

T +61 8 6555 3980

F +61 8 6555 3981

rumbleresources.com.au

ASX RTR

Executives & Management

Mr Shane Sikora Managing Director

Mr Brett Keillor Technical Director

Mr Matthew Banks Non-executive Director

Mr Michael Smith Non-executive Director

Mr Peter Venn Non-executive Director

Mr Steven Wood Company Secretary

Rumble Resources Limited (ASX: RTR) ("Rumble" or "the Company") is pleased to announce significant new drilling results at the Tonka and Navajoh Prospects located within the Earaheedy Project, 140km northeast of Wiluna, Western Australia. The results have delineated a major increase in the dimensions of the mineralised footprint at the Tonka-Navajoh Prospects to an area of 8km by 1.4km and along with the Chinook Zn-Pb-Ag-Cu Prospect (4.1km x 1.9km), and clearly underlines the Earaheedy Project's credentials as a potential emerging world class base metal system.

Tonka and Navajoh Prospects RC Drilling Results – E69/3464

A further forty-six (46) RC drill-holes (total of 7450m) results have been received for the Tonka and Navajoh Prospects within the Earaheedy JV Project. Scoping on 500m line spacing has defined shallow northeast dipping unconformity related Zn-Pb mineralisation at the Tonka and Navajoh Prospects. The latest drilling has led to the Company merging the Tonka and Magazine Prospects which is now just known as the Tonka Prospect.

Tonka (merged with Magazine) Prospect (Images 1 and 2)

Sulphide mineralisation (sphalerite, galena and pyrite) was intersected in the majority of holes with drill-hole assay intersections including:

• 20m @ 4.27% Zn + Pb, 3.71 g/t Ag from 112m (EHRC398) including
  • o 1m @ 8.75% Zn + Pb, 5.6 g/t Ag from 113m and
  • o 8m @ 6.75% Zn + Pb, 5.2 g/t Ag from 117m
• 12m @ 4.41% Zn + Pb, 0.91 g/t Ag from 67m (EHRC320) including
  • o 6m @ 5.54% Zn + Pb, 1.13 g/t Ag from 72m
• 19m @ 1.88% Zn + Pb, 2.37 g/t Ag from 143m (EHRC400) including
  • o 5m @ 5.09% Zn + Pb, 5.12 g/t Ag from 143m with
  • o 2m @ 7.49% Zn + Pb, 7.4 g/t Ag from 143m
• 8m @ 3.22% Zn + Pb, 13.5 g/t Ag from 57m (EHRC315)

Drill – hole intersections are true width

Mineralisation is hosted within the Navajoh Unconformity Unit (see section DD - image 3). The basal unconformity lithologies are variable with predomantly siltstone/sandstone hosting mineralisation to the southwest grading into silicified reworked carbonates after micrite/marl (proximal to palaeo-karst) towards the northeast.

The mineralised footprint (>0.5 % Zn + Pb) at Tonka has grown to a strike of 4.3km and is up to 1.2 km in width (based on 8 sections) and remains open northwest and southeast along strike, and down-dip to the northeast (see image 1). The drill hole sections are broad-spaced (currently scoping stage) on mainly 500m spaced lines. The size of the mineralisation footprint is similar to that currently outlined at the Chinook Prospect, which lies 6km to the northwest of Tonka.

Down-dip (northeast) to the Tonka mineralisation (see image 2), two broad spaced historic diamond core drill-holes returned strong anomalism, 10m @ 1.76% Zn + Pb (EDH001) and 50m @ 0.53% Zn + Pb (TDH19), which highlights the potential for continuity of mineralisation (down-dip). Further northeast into the Earaheedy Basin, a single historic diamond core drill hole returned a broad anomalous zone for 54m @ 0.96% Zn + Pb (TDH28). This intersection is some 1.7km down-dip of the Tonka and Navajoh Prospects.

Image 2 – Tonka Prospect – Section DD (see image 1) with Latest Drill Hole Assays and Intersections

Navajoh Prospect (Images 3 and 5)

RC drilling comprised of four lines at 500m spacing at Navajoh. The main section (Section FF – see images 3 and 5) has defined a continuous zone of Zn-Pb mineralisation over a 2km strike and 1.4km wide (see image 1). The mineralisation is flatly dipping to the northeast (similar to Chinook and Tonka) and is open along strike to the southeast, to the northwest towards the Tonka Prospect and down dip to the northeast. Drill-hole assay intersections from Navajoh include:

• 17m @ 4.79% Zn + Pb, 4.25 g/t Ag from 170m (EHRC287)
  • o Incl 4m @ 8.31% Zn + Pb, 5.38 g/t Ag from 170m and
  • o 7m @ 5.62% Zn + Pb, 5.3 g/t Ag from 179m
• 12m @ 4.48% Zn + Pb, 5.26 g/t Ag from 152m (EHRC419)
  • o Incl 6m @ 6.51% Zn + Pb, 7.1 g/t Ag from 152m
• 23m @ 2.45% Zn + Pb, 1.18 g/t Ag from 176m to EOH (EHRC290)
  • o Incl 1m @ 4.25% Zn + Pb, 1.5 g/t Ag from 177m and
  • o 3m @ 7.52% Zn + Pb, 1.89 g/t Ag from 181m
• 12m @ 3.47% Zn + Pb, 2.37 g/t Ag from 188m (EHRC289)
  • o Incl 3m @ 4.6% Zn + Pb, 3.03 g/t Ag from 190m
  • o 1m @ 4.62% Zn + Pb, 3.8 g/t Ag from 195m and
  • o 1m @ 6.75% Zn + Pb, 4.8 g/t Ag from 198m

Image 3 – Navajoh Prospect – Section FF - (see image 1) with Latest Drill Hole Assays and Intersections

Like Tonka, the mineralisation is primary sulphide hosted in the Navajoh Unconformity Unit and consists of sphalerite, galena and pyrite. Lithologies immediately above the unconformity are predominantly clastic sediments including sandstone and siltstone.

Tonka-Navajoh Area Potential (Images 1, 4 and 5)

The Tonka – Navajoh mineralised trend currently has a combined strike of 8km and up to 1.4km in width (Navajoh). Only three historic drill-holes have effectively penetrated the mineralised Navajoh Unconformity Unit between Tonka and Navajoh (see image 1 for historic results).

All holes were mineralised with results including:

• 19m @ 0.77% Zn + Pb to EOH (TRC80)
• 22m @ 0.64% Zn + Pb (TRC83)
• 20m @ 0.37% Zn + Pb (RHRC005)

As a result, the Rumble team consider it high likely that the Tonka and Navajoh mineralisation will merge into one very large prospect with further scoping drilling.

Recently acquired airborne magnetics, detailed gravity data, and the 500m spaced (scoping) RC drilling has assisted the exploration team in updating the litho-structural interpretation of the Tonka-Navajoh mineralised trend.

Interpreted Structure over Airborne Magnetics (RTP1VD)

A series of northeast trending faults (structures) highlighted by both magnetics and gravity (see images 4 and 5) have a strong correlation with higher-grade zinc-lead mineralisation. These northeast structures are interpreted to be long lived, and it is inferred that their early development may be associated with the main metallogenic event, which is responsible for the widespread base metal mineralisation within the lower Earaheedy Basin. The structures are considered potential feeders and have been overprinted by the later faulting stages of the Lockeridge Fault System. The main lithologies trend northwest and dip between 5-10° to the northeast.

Image 5 – Tonka Navajoh Prospects Zn + Pb Contours (maximum downhole) & Interpreted Structure over Gravity

Chinook – Tonka – Navajoh Litho-structural Interpretation (Image 6)

Litho-structural interpretation of the Chinook – Tonka – Navajoh mineralised system based on airborne magnetics, gravity and recent drill-hole geology has highlighted the following.

• The Earaheedy base metal mineralisation (>0.5% Zn + Pb) currently occurs over a strike of 18km, open to the northwest, west, southeast and down dip to the northeast.
  • o Areas within the mineralised trend have yet to be drill tested, however, Rumble is confident the mineralisation is continuous.
• Mineralisation (sphalerite, galena and pyrite) occurs within the regionally extensive Navajoh Unconformity Unit.
  • o At Chinook, the mineralisation is hosted/associated with palaeo-karst dominant sediments silicified dolomite and carbonate derived clastics (marl and micrite).
  • o At Tonka, the mineralisation is hosted/associated with both palaeo-karst and clastic (sandstone/siltstone) sediments
  • o At Navajoh, the mineralization is hosted/associated with clastic dominant sediments.
• Within the mineralisation styles identified (see image 8 for styles), higher-grade zinc, lead, silver and copper are associated with feeder structures (metal fluid conduits). The attitude of the feeder structures vary subject to spatial relationship and structural dynamics with the Lockeridge Fault System. The Lockeridge Fault System is considered long lived with the initial early development stage likely associated with mineralisation.
  • o The Chinook Prospect lies to the west of the Lockeridge Fault and the recently discovered Kalitan Feeder Zone and multiple inferred feeder zones parallels the fault along and are northwest trending
  • o The Tonka Navajoh Prospects lie to the east of the Lockeridge Fault and the potential feeder structures are interpreted to trend northeast.

Image 6 - Chinook – Tonka – Navajoh Prospects and Surrounds – Maximum downhole grade contours, Interpreted Structure over TMI 1VD RTP Airborne Magnetics

Earaheedy Project – Emerging World Class Base Metal System

Since the Chinook discovery in April 2021, scoping drilling has uncovered a rapidly expanding world class scale Zn-Pb-Ag-Cu metal system, with the drilling continuing to make discoveries and additional multiple large-scale deposit type targets emerging confirming the province-scale base metal potential at Earaheedy. Recently, two key tenements have been granted (ASX: RTR Announcement – 20/1/2022). The granting of E69/3787 and E69/3862 (both 100% RTR) along with the current JV tenement E69/3464 (75% RTR:25% Zenith Minerals) has highlighted some 42km of highly prospective strike along the host Navajoh Unconformity Unit (See image 8).

The overall geological deposition model for the emerging Earaheedy Base Metal Province is continually evolving with some five (5) styles of mineralisation identified (see image 7). Rumble has confirmed at least four (4) of these styles have been defined within the Earaheedy Project and based on recent drilling completed by Strickland Metals (see ASX announcement STK – 14/10/2021 & 14/02/22), the likelihood of significant Iroquois Dolomite hosted mineralisation below Chinook, Tonka, Magazine and Navajoh is high. The current drilling has outlined laterally extensive flat lying unconformity related Zn-Pb-Ag dominant sulphide mineralisation at the Chinook, Tonka, Magazine and Navajoh Prospects (Mineralisation Styles 1 and 2 – image 7). The mineralisation footprint at Chinook is currently 4.1km by 1.9km, whilst the combined mineralised envelope for Tonka (includes Magazine) and Navajoh Trend is 8km by 1.4km. The unconformity style mineralisation in both areas remains open along strike and down dip – See image 7. To the southwest and immediately below the unconformity related mineralisation at Tonka, a very wide low-grade Zn-Pb zone has been discovered within the Purple Shale unit that lies below the Navajoh Unconformity. This mineralisation (Style 5) is a wide fracture zone with multiple fault veinlets with sphalerite, galena, pyrite and chalcopyrite. Historic drilling completed by Renison Goldfields Consolidated (RGC) within the main Navajoh Dolomite unit which lies down-dip and to the northeast of the current Rumble prospects, intersected Mississippi Valley Type Zn-Pb-Ag fault related mineralisation (Mineralisation Style 3 – image 7).

Image 7 – Earaheedy Project - Model of Multiple Mineralisation Styles

Exploration Program 2021:

Approximately 15% of the 50,000m assays remain outstanding

Exploration program for 2022:

Chinook & Tonka-Navajoh Prospects (E69/3464 (RTR (75%) / ZNC (25%) JV)

The immediate focus for the current drilling campaign includes:

• RC infill and extension drilling to further delineate the shallow high-grade Zn-Pb mineralisation in the Navajoh Unconformity Unit within the Kalitan Feeder Zone and adjacent interpreted feeders
• Diamond core drilling to test the feeder structures in the underlying Purple Shale and Iroquois Formations targeting new Cu-Zn-Pb-Ag discoveries
• RC drill testing the recently interpreted northeast trending structures with the focus on delineating new higher-grade Zn-Pb-Ag zones.
• Ongoing scoping and infill RC drilling of the Tonka-Navajoh Trend

Sweetwater Tenements (E69/3787 and E69/3862 RTR 100%)

• Rumble is in advanced stages with TMPAC to complete heritage surveys to clear the upcoming planned exploration programs
• Once the heritage surveys are completed, the focus of drilling will be to rapidly extend and define the limits of Chinook's large Zn-Pb-Ag-Cu mineralised footprint to the west, and to extend the Tonka-Navajoh mineralised footprint further to the southeast.
• A large surface geochemical survey is planned along the entire 15kms of the Sweetwater Trend which in combination with the airborne magnetic data should delineate additional new first order drill targets

Image 8 - Earaheedy Project – Prospectivity Map

First Stage Exploration Target

Rumble's Zn-Pb exploration target at the Earaheedy Project is between 100 to 120 million tonnes at a grade ranging between 3.5% Zn-Pb to 4.5% Zn-Pb Sulphide. The exploration target is at a shallow depth (120m), and over 40kms of prospective strike (completely open) has been defined within the Earaheedy Project. The potential quantity and grade of the exploration target is conceptual in nature, there has been insufficient exploration to estimate a Mineral Resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the estimation of a Mineral Resource. The exploration target, being conceptual in nature, takes no account of geological complexity, possible mining method or metallurgical recovery factors. The exploration target has been estimated in order to provide an assessment of the potential for large-scale Zn-Pb deposits within the Earaheedy Project. The exploration target has been prepared and reported in accordance with the 2012 edition of the JORC Code.

Earaheedy Zn-Pb Project – Exploration Target
Range	Tonnes	Grade
Lower	100,000,000	3.5% Zn + Pb Sulphide
Upper	120,000,000	4.5% Zn + Pb Sulphide

Table 1: Near surface exploration target down to 120 metre - shallow depth

The potential quantity and grade of the exploration target is conceptual in nature. There has been insufficient exploration to estimate a Mineral Resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the estimation of a Mineral Resource. The exploration target is based on the current geological understanding of the mineralisation geometry, continuity of mineralisation and regional geology. This understanding is provided by an extensive drill hole database, regional mapping, coupled with understanding of the host stratigraphic sequence.

Included in the data on which this exploration target has been prepared are results from approximately 85% of some 50,000m of drilling completed by Rumble. Historic drilling includes sixty-four (64) holes completed within the project area (E69/3464) by previous explorers (refer historical exploration results in previous ASX announcements dated 5 February 2019 and 12 October 2017, 23rd January 2020 which continue to apply and have not materially changed). Some of the considerations in respect of the estimation of the exploration target include:

• Drilling results have demonstrated strong continuity of shallow, flat lying sulphide mineralisation;
• Over 42km's of prospective strike and open (refer image 8);
• Minimum 600m of width based on shallow 7.5° and shallow depth to 120m, based on drilling results;
• True width (thickness) of mineralisation up to 51 metres received in drilling results; and
• Specific gravity (SG) of 2.5 (world average SG of sandstone not accounting for metal).

The Company intends to test the exploration target with drilling and this further drilling is expected to extend over approximately 12 months. Grade ranges have been either estimated or assigned from lower and upper grades of mineralisation received in drilling results. A classification is not applicable for an exploration target.

About the Earaheedy Project

The Earaheedy project is located approximately 110km north east of Wiluna, Western Australia. Rumble owns 75% of E69/3464 and Zenith Minerals Ltd (ASX: ZNC) owns 25%. Rumble has two contiguous exploration licenses, ELA69/3787 and ELA69/3862 that is held 100%.

Since the Major Zn-Pb-Ag-Cu discovery in April 2021, scoping drilling has uncovered a rapidly expanding world class scale Zn-Pb-Ag-Cu base metal system, with the drilling continuing to make discoveries and new multiple large-scale targets emerging.

The Project covers 42km of unconformity prospective strike which remains untested and completely open.

Authorisation

This announcement is authorised for release by Shane Sikora, Managing Director of the Company.

-Ends-

For further information visit rumbleresources.com.au or contact info@rumbleresources.com.au. Previous Drill Results

Drill hole results are ongoing and previous assays have been reported in earlier ASX announcements.

• ASX Release 23/8/2019 14 High Priority Targets and New Mineralisation Style
• ASX Release 23/1/2020 Large Scale Zn-Pb-Ag Discoveries at Earaheedy
• ASX Release 19/4/2021 Major Zinc-Lead Discovery at Earaheedy Project, Western Australia
• ASX Release 2/6/2021 Large Scale Zinc-Lead-Silver SEDEX Style System Emerging at Earaheedy
• ASX Release 8/7/2021 Broad Spaced Scout Drilling Has Significantly Increased the Zn-Pb-Ag-Mn footprint at Earaheedy
• ASX Release 23/8/2021 Earaheedy Zn-Pb-Ag-Mn Project Exploration Update
• ASX Release 13/12/2021 New Zinc-Lead-Silver Discovery at Earaheedy Project
• ASX Release 21/12/2021 Major Zinc-Lead-Silver-Copper Feeder Fault Intersected
• ASX Release 20/1/2022 Two Key Tenements Granted at Earaheedy Zn-Pb-Ag-Cu Project
• ASX Release 31/1/2022 Shallow High-Grade Zn-Pb Sulphides Intersected at Earaheedy
• ASX Release 21/2/2022 Further High-Grade Zn-Pb Results and Strong Grade Continuity

About Rumble Resources Ltd

Rumble Resources Ltd is an Australian based exploration company, officially admitted to the ASX on the 1st July 2011. Rumble was established with the aim of adding significant value to its current mineral exploration assets and will continue to look at mineral acquisition opportunities both in Australia and abroad.

Competent Persons Statement

The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results and Exploration Targets is based on and fairly represents information compiled by Mr Brett Keillor, who is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining & Metallurgy and the Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Mr Keillor is an employee of Rumble Resources Limited. Mr Keillor has sufficient experience relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the "Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves". Mr Keillor consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

Previously Reported Information

The information in this report that references previously reported exploration results is extracted from the Company's ASX market announcements released on the date noted in the body of the text where that reference appears. The previous market announcements are available to view on the Company's website or on the ASX website (www. asx.com.au). The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original market announcements. The Company confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person's findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original market announcements.

Disclaimer

This report contains certain forward-looking statements and forecasts, including possible or assumed reserves and resources, production levels and rates, costs, prices, future performance or potential growth of Rumble Resources Ltd, industry growth or other trend projections. Such statements are not a guarantee of future performance and involve unknown risks and uncertainties, as well as other factors which are beyond the control of Rumble Resources Ltd. Actual results and developments may differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward looking statements depending on a variety of factors. Nothing in this report should be construed as either an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell securities. This document has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Australian securities laws, which may differ from the requirements of United States and other country securities laws. Unless otherwise indicated, all ore reserve and mineral resource estimates included or incorporated by reference in this document have been, and will be, prepared in accordance with the JORC classification system of the Australasian Institute of Mining, and Metallurgy and Australian Institute of Geoscientists.

								Table 2
Hole IDE MGA	N MGA	Depth (m)	DipAzi	From (m)	To (m)	Width (m)	0.5% Zn +Pb	2% Zn + Pb	4% Zn + Pb	Drill Hole Location, Intersections and Assay Table Tonka - Navajoh Prospects (GDA94 Z51)>1000ppm Zn + Pb	Ag g/t	S %	Zn %	Pb %	Other
EHRC175259809	7161583	102	-900inclincl	323643	523744	2011	1.12	2.852.5			2.7	0.090.110.11	0.852.211.73	0.270.640.77
EHRC177259118EHRC178259222	71622497162421	149113	-900-900	37	83	46				0.44		1.17	0.35	0.11	NSR
EHRC179259319EHRC180259425	71625947162750	131143	incl-900-900	39	56	17	0.52					0.1	0.46	0.08	NSRNSR
EHRC182260341EHRC184260557	71612037161546	95107	-900-900incl	428587	6211988	20341	0.670.89	2.04			2.768.6	0.21.813.89	0.460.721.81	0.210.170.23	2m Void
			inclincl	103117	104118	11		2.142.16			8.31.9	6.541.15	1.971.8	0.170.36
EHRC315260798EHRC394261141	71608507161102	85192	-900incl-900	4357102	6765132	24830	1.461.01	3.22			5.9413.51.48	0.551.31.09	0.922.270.88	0.540.950.13	5m Void
			inclincl	102114	103115	11		2.382.28			2.17.2	1.354.76	2.012.08	0.370.2
EHRC396261203	7161306	186	incl-900and	117125149	118139163	11414	0.971.41	3.27			1.92.162.07	1.21.851.18	3.040.71.24	0.230.270.17
EHRC318260751	7160436	204	inclincl-900	14915525	15016029	154	0.73	2.612.5			2.031.48	1.471.490.11	2.292.250.72	0.320.250.01
EHRC319260812	7160534	204	and-900	15542	15748	16	1.191.01				1.31.83	0.670.1	0.780.21	0.410.8
EHRC311260861EHRC313260976	71602487160412	161185	and-900-900	1698441	1738642	421	1.490.540.77				2.41.4	2.610.450.18	0.580.520.42	0.910.020.35
EHRC309260945	7160196	173	-900incl	7274	8477	123	1.15	2.91				1.483.23	1.072.79	0.050.12
EHRC310261076	7160377	223	-900andand	109127199	112128204	315	0.561.482.74				0.65.84	0.181.152.69	0.111.460.44	0.450.022.34
EHRC305261119	7160092	209	incl-900	1995363	20218088	312725	1.36	4.05		0.45	8.531.2	2.781.77	0.610.87	3.440.49
			inclincl	6385	6886	51		3.353.23			1.80.5	2.154.3	1.573.17	1.780.06
EHRC304261237EHRC308261172	71602597160044	175191	-900incl-900	525351	595653	732	1.680.81	2.39			1.471.60.55	0.190.220.49	0.861.220.03	0.821.170.78
EHRC307261340EHRC322261539EHRC320261671	716021671599157160081	163108137	-900-900-900	513163	673280	16117	1.120.563.3				0.89	0.150.140.53	0.870.013.07	0.250.550.23
			inclwith	6772	7976	126		4.41	5.54		0.911.13	0.60.69	4.155.29	0.260.25
EHRC321261759	7160247	153	-900incland	91100106	111103109	2033	1.27	2.82.56			1.1421.7	0.741.60.47	1.072.562.41	0.20.240.15
EHRC397261896EHRC398261947	71604197160498	162174	-900-900	101112	120138	1926	0.973.58				2.383.19	0.891.74	0.683	0.290.58
			inclwithand	112113117	132114125	2018		4.27	8.756.75		3.715.65.2	2.083.873.36	3.556.975.7	0.721.781.05
EHRC400262050	7160667	198	-900inclwith	143143143	162148145	1952	1.88	5.09	7.49		2.375.127.4	1.53.354.65	1.694.56.73	0.190.590.76
EHRC352261382EHRC351261455	71593797159458	143137	-900-900												NSRNSR
EHRC350261522EHRC268263799EHRC270263902	715953571584247158597	14992125	-900-900-900												NSRNSRNSR
EHRC272264009EHRC273264066	71587637158844	143161	-900-900	86	91	5	0.65				0.8	1.3	0.58	0.07	NSR
EHRC274264117EHRC276264219EHRC302264305	715893771590997159163	174192167	-900-900-900	139128136	141133144	258	1.650.540.62				1.71.32.35	0.62.032.81	0.430.240.42	1.220.30.2
EHRC419264408	7159229	222	-900incl	152152	212164	6012	1.36	4.48			5.26	1.424.19	1.113.53	0.250.95
EHRC431264294	7158376	138	with-900incl	1529097	15810798	6171	1.16	2.47	6.51		7.12.293.9	5.941.532.85	5.250.821.77	1.260.340.7
EHRC432264426EHRC433264557	71585247158676	156174	-900incl-900	115125116	126126126	11110	0.881.13	2.28			1.171.92.15	1.221.941.36	0.782.140.97	0.10.140.16
EHRC283264899	7158511	179	incl-900	122146	123155	19	1.41	2			2.83.31	1.621.43	1.761.14	0.240.27
EHRC288B265454	7158781	204	incl-900incl	146183183	148197186	2143	1.52	2.533.25			81.252.07	2.781.752.32	2.041.392.87	0.490.130.38
EHRC289265542	7158826	218	-900incl	188188	216200	2812	1.97	3.47			1.452.37	2.183.23	1.692.95	0.280.52
			inclinclincl	190195198	193196199	311			4.64.626.75		3.033.84.8	3.754.365.73	3.854.285.02	0.750.341.73
EHRC290265621	7158868	199	-900incl	176177	199 EOH178	231	2.45		4.25		1.181.5	2.313.77	2.33.96	0.150.29
EHRC416265061	7157789	162	incl-900incl	181122122	184130125	383	1.88	3.29	7.52		1.892.033.3	6.62.043.55	7.291.472.47	0.230.410.82
EHRC287265344	7158722	192	-900incl	170170	187174	174		4.79			4.25	3.74	4.22	0.54

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Samplingtechniques	Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels,random chips, or specific specialised industry standardmeasurement tools appropriate to the minerals underinvestigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, orhandheld XRF instruments, etc.). These examplesshould not be taken as limiting the broad meaning ofsampling.Include reference to measures taken to ensure samplerepresentivity and the appropriate calibration of anymeasurement tools or systems used.Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that areMaterial to the Public Report.In cases where 'industry standard' work has been donethis would be relatively simple (e.g. 'reverse circulationdrilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fireassay'). In other cases more explanation may berequired, such as where there is coarse gold that hasinherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities ormineralisation types (e.g. submarine nodules) maywarrant disclosure of detailed information.	RC sampling completed on1m intervals using Metzke Staticcone splitter is dry. If wet, samplecollected in large polywoven, thenallowed to dry for 24 hrs. Samplingwas by spear along inside of bag.Weight of sample was onaverage >2kg.Samples sent to ALS,Malaga, Perth, WA and are beingassayed using a four acid digest andread by ICP-AES analyticalinstrument. At total of 33 elementsare reported including Ag, Al, As, Ba,Bi, Ca, Cd, Ce, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, K, La,Li, Mg, Mn, Mo, Na, Ni, P, Pb, S, Sb,Sc, Sr, Th, Ti, Tl, U, V, W, Zn.pXRF analysis utilises aVanta Olympus XRF analyser andinvolves a single shot every metre(RC) with routine standards (CRM)
Drillingtechniques	Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open-holehammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc.)and details (e.g. core diameter, triple or standard tube,depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type,whether core is oriented and if so, by what method,etc.)	RC face hammer sampling (5.5indiameter). Rig used was an AtlasCopco 220 with 1250cfm air and435psi compressor.
Drill samplerecovery	Method of recording and assessing core and chipsample recoveries and results assessed.Measures taken to maximise sample recovery andensure representative nature of the samples.Whether a relationship exists between sample recoveryand grade and whether sample bias may haveoccurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarsematerial.	RC drilling cuttings were collected as1 metre intervals with correspondingchip tray interval kept for reference.In general the dry sample versus thewet sample weight did not vary as thewet sample was collected in apolyweave bag which allowed excesswater to seep and kept the drillcutting fines intact in the bag.
Logging	Whether core and chip samples have been geologicallyand geotechnically logged to a level of detail to supportappropriate Mineral Resource estimation, miningstudies and metallurgical studies.Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature.Core (or costean, channel, etc.) photography.The total length and percentage of the relevantintersections logged.	Each metre was geologically loggedwith pXRF analysis.All drill cuttings logged.
Subsamplingtechniquesand samplepreparation	If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, halfor all core taken.If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split,etc. and whether sampled wet or dry.For all sample types, the nature, quality andappropriateness of the sample preparation technique.Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-samplingstages to maximise representivity of samples.Measures taken to ensure that the sampling isrepresentative of the in situ material collected,including for instance results for field duplicate/secondhalf sampling.Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain	RC Drilling as belowo Each metre was analysed by aVanta pXRF. The Vanta usedstandards (CRM).o If the assay response was>1000ppm Zn, a sample (>2kg)was taken and delivered to ALS forwet analysis.o Sampling QA/QC involved aduplicate taken every 20m, and astandard taken every 20m. 4standards (OREAS CRMs) levelsand one blank were usedrandomly.

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	size of the material being sampled.
Qualityofassaydataandlaboratorytests	The nature, quality and appropriateness of theassaying and laboratory procedures used and whetherthe technique is considered partial or total.For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRFinstruments, etc., the parameters used in determiningthe analysis including instrument make and model,reading times, calibrations factors applied and theirderivation, etc.Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g.standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratorychecks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (i.e.lack of bias) and precision have been established.	Theassignedassayingmethodology (4 acid) is total digest.Asdiscussed,theVantapXRF analyser was used to thresholdthe collection of samples for wetanalysis.InadditiontoRumblesQA/QCmethods(duplicates,standards and blanks), the laboratoryhas additional checks.
Verificationof samplingandassaying	The verification of significant intersections by eitherindependent or alternative company personnel.The use of twinned holes.Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures,data verification, data storage (physical and electronic)protocols.Discuss any adjustment to assay data.	Significantintersectionsreported by company personnel only.Documentation and review isongoing. Prior to final vetting, enteredinto database.
Locationofdata points	Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drillholes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mineworkings and other locations used in Mineral Resourceestimation.Specification of the grid system used.Quality and adequacy of topographic control.	All drillhole collars surveyedusing DGPS – Datum is MGA94 Zone51.
Dataspacing anddistribution	Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficientto establish the degree of geological and gradecontinuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource andOre Reserve estimation procedure(s) andclassifications applied.Whether sample compositing has been applied.	No resource work completed. TheRC drilling is reconnaissance(scoping) by nature with drill holespacing on average 500m x 100mapart.Single metre and composites used.
Orientationofdatainrelationtogeologicalstructure	Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiasedsampling of possible structures and the extent to whichthis is known, considering the deposit type.If the relationship between the drilling orientation andthe orientation of key mineralised structures isconsidered to have introduced a sampling bias, thisshould be assessed and reported if material.	Previous drilling (and historic) hasdefined a consistent flat lyingsedimentary package.Drilling is normal (90°) to themineralised intersections. True widthreported. No bias.A single traverse of angled RC holescompleted to ascertain if footwallstructures could be determined. Thesingle traverse was at -60 andrepresented approximately 85% oftrue width.
Samplesecurity	The measures taken to ensure sample security.	All sampling packaging and securitycompleted by Rumble personnel,from collection of sample to deliveryat laboratory.
Auditsorreviews	The results of any audits or reviews of samplingtechniques and data.	No audits completed.

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Mineraltenementand	Type, reference name/number, location andownership including agreements or material issueswith third parties such as joint ventures,partnerships, overriding royalties, native title	The Earaheedy Project comprises ofa granted exploration license – TheEaraheedy Project comprises ofE69/3464 (75% Rumble and 25%

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
landtenurestatus	interests, historical sites, wilderness or national parkand environmental settings.The security of the tenure held at the time ofreporting along with any known impediments toobtaining a licence to operate in the area.	Zenith Minerals – JV) and tworecently granted exploration licensesE69/3787 and E69/3862 (100%Rumble)E69/3464 is in a state of goodstanding and has no knownimpediments to operate in the area.
Explorationdone by otherparties	Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration byother parties.	Exploration solely completed byRumble Resources
Geology	Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation.	The Earaheedy Project Deposit typeis unconformity related sandstonehosted Zn-Pb type. Also MVT(Mississippi Valley Type) to SEDEXstyle associated with carbonates hasbeen identified. Current work byRumble has identified unconformityrelated sandstone hosted Zn Pbtype.
DrillholeInformation	A summary of all information material to theunderstanding of the exploration results including atabulation of the following information for all Materialdrill holes:easting and northing of the drill hole collaroelevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevationoabove sea level in metres) of the drill hole collardip and azimuth of the holeodown hole length and interception depthohole length.oIf the exclusion of this information is justified on thebasis that the information is not Material and thisexclusion does not detract from the understanding ofthe report, the Competent Person should clearlyexplain why this is the case.	Table 1 – Near surface explorationtarget down to 120 metre - shallowdepthTable 2 – Drill Hole Location,Intersections and Assay Table Tonka -Navajoh Prospects (GDA94 Z51)
Dataaggregationmethods	In reporting Exploration Results, weightingaveraging techniques, maximum and/orminimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of highgrades) and cut-off grades are usually Materialand should be stated.Where aggregate intercepts incorporate shortlengths of high-grade results and longer lengthsof low-grade results, the procedure used forsuch aggregation should be stated and sometypical examples of such aggregations shouldbe shown in detail.The assumptions used for any reporting ofmetal equivalent values should be clearlystated.	Historic drilling cut-off grades usedinclude:o0.5% Zno0.5% Zn + Pbo>0.1% ZnThe Zn:Pb ratio is variable over theproject area. On average the Zn:Pbratio for sulphide is 3. The averageZn:Pb ratio for oxide is 0.8.Historic drilling – if diamond drillingor RC composite – weightedaverage used.
Relationshipbetweenmineralisationwidthsandinterceptlengths	These relationships are particularly important inthe reporting of Exploration Results.If the geometry of the mineralisation withrespect to the drill hole angle is known, itsnature should be reported.If it is not known and only the down hole lengthsare reported, there should be a clear statementto this effect (e.g. 'down hole length, true widthnot known').	Drilling is vertical. Mineralisation isflat. Width of mineralisation is truewidth.A single RC traverse was completedat -60. Intersection represents 85%of true width.

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Diagrams	Appropriate maps and sections (with scales)and tabulations of intercepts should be includedfor any significant discovery being reportedThese should include, but not be limited to aplan view of drill hole collar locations andappropriate sectional views.	Image 1 - Tonka (Magazine) –NavajohProspects–MaximumGrade in Drill Hole Contouring plusLatest Drill Hole IntersectionsImage 2 - Tonka Prospect –Section DD (see image 2) withLatest Drill Hole Assays andIntersectionsImage 3 – Navajoh Prospect –Section FF - (see image 2) withLatest Drill Hole Assays andIntersectionsImage 4 - Tonka Navajoh Prospects –Zn + Pb Contours (Max DH) overAirborne Mags (RTP1VD) withStructureImage 5 -Tonka Navajoh Prospects Zn +Pb Contours (Max DH) over Gravity withStructureImage 6 - Chinook – Tonka – NavajohProspects and Surrounds – Structureand Potential over TMI 1VD RTPAirborne Magnetics + Maximum gradecontouringImage 7 - Earaheedy Project - Model ofMultiple Mineralisation StylesImage 8 - Earaheedy Project –Prospectivity MapImage 9 - Earaheedy Project – Geologyand Prospect Location Plan
Balancedreporting	Where comprehensive reporting of allExploration Results is not practicable,representative reporting of both low and highgrades and/or widths should be practiced toavoid misleading reporting of ExplorationResults.	Table 2 reports drill hole locationwith assay intersections based onvarious Zn + Pb cut off grades.
Othersubstantiveexplorationdata	Other exploration data, if meaningful andmaterial, should be reported including (but notlimited to): geological observations; geophysicalsurvey results; geochemical survey results; bulksamples – size and method of treatment;metallurgical test results; bulk density,groundwater, geotechnical and rockcharacteristics; potential deleterious orcontaminating substances.	pXRF analyser is used only togauge >1000ppm Zn. If sample is>1000ppm Zn and/or within amineralised section, 1m RCsamples are sent for wet analysis (4acid digest multi-element)
Further work	The nature and scale of planned further work(e.g. tests for lateral extensions or depthextensions or large-scale step-out drilling).Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas ofpossible extensions, including the maingeological interpretations and future drillingareas, provided this information is notcommercially sensitive.	RC drilling – Ongoing scoping andinfill RC drilling at Tonka – NavajohRC drilling of the inferred northeastfeeder zonesRC Drilling – Infill and extension ofKalitan feeder ZoneDD into the Kalitan Feeder ZoneRC drilling – reconnaissance –scoping work