AI assistant
RTG Mining Inc. — Regulatory Filings 2015
Feb 4, 2015
47130_rns_2015-02-04_ceac136a-90d5-4161-96e4-9767846c5366.pdf
Regulatory Filings
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
Level 2, 338 Barker Road Subiaco WA 6008 Phone: +61 8 6489 2900 www.rtgmining.com
ABN: 70 164 362 850
==> picture [152 x 88] intentionally omitted <==
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION TO UNITED STATES NEWS WIRE SERVICES OR FOR DISSEMINATION IN THE UNITED STATES
RTG ANNOUNCES HIGH GRADE INTERCEPTS AT BUNAWAN PROJECT
ANNOUNCEMENT TO THE TORONTO STOCK EXCHANGE AND AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES EXCHANGE
FEBRUARY 2015
The Board of RTG Mining Inc. (“RTG”, “the Company”) ( TSX Code: RTG, ASX Code: RTG ) is pleased to announce that reconnaissance diamond drilling has intercepted high grade mineralization at the Bunawan Project in the Philippines including 7m @ 4.18g/t Au and 4m @ 12.33g/t Au.
Mineralisation was intercepted in 6 of the 9 holes drilled, with substantial mineralisation found in 3 holes (BDH-01, 06 and 08) which tested a corridor marked by artisanal workings along the southern margin of the Mahunoc diatreme (Figure 2).
| Hole | From | To | Metres | Au g/t | Ag g/t | Host Lithology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BDH‐01 | 163 | 186 | 23 | 1.23 | 8.56 | diatreme |
| including | 163 | 175 | 12 | 1.63 | 9.85 | diatreme |
| BDH‐06 | 111 | 147 | 36 | 1.49 | 8.29 | diatreme/andesite |
| including | 113 | 120 | 7 | 4.18 | 14.05 | diatreme |
| BDH‐08 | 229 | 239 | 10 | 5.09 | 3.8 | andesite |
| including | 235 | 239 | 4 | 12.33 | 6.42 | andesite |
| including | 238 | 238.35 | 0.35 | 126.7 | 46.3 | andesite |
Table 1 - Significant Down-hole Intersections
Note that the true width of the mineralisation is not known at this stage.
ABOUT BUNAWAN
The Bunawan Property is located in the east of Mindanao Island in Agusan del Sur province, approximately 190 km north-northeast of Davao and adjacent to the Davao – Surigao highway.
The Bunawan Project is centered on a diatreme intrusive complex (Mahunoc diatreme) approximately five km NE of Medusa Mining’s Co-O mine in eastern Mindanao. Historical production at the Co-O Mine has demonstrated a significant high grade gold system and there is active artisinal mining throughout the region which further reinforces the gold potential of the area. A number of the artisanal mining operations occur within and adjacent to the Mahunoc diatreme and the area is highly prospective for the discovery of economic epithermal Au-Ag mineralisation of intermediate sulphidation / carbonate-base metal type.
==> picture [318 x 421] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 1 - Location Plan with Regional Geology Showing Both the Co-O and Mahunoc Diatreme Complexes
Drilling Program
The reconnaissance drilling program (nine holes for 3,074 metres) was targeted at coincident Au in soil and magnetic anomalies as well as areas of artisanal workings (see Figure 2). The drilling has confirmed that the mineralised corridor on the southern margin of the diatreme
(marked by extensive shallow artisanal workings in the diatreme and a coincident district scale structural zone) is a highly prospective target zone.
The three most significant drill intercepts are in the three holes (BDH-01, 06 and 08) within and adjacent to the corridor. The disseminated Au in silica-matrix breccias within the diatreme seen in artisanal workings and drilling (BDH-01) are interpreted to have been introduced into porous clast-rich zones within the diatreme from structurally controlled epithermal vein zones in the andesite below the diatreme apron such as that intersected in BDH-08.
The grade of the high grade quartz-calcite vein zone in BDH-08 is strongly influenced by a narrow interval grading 0.35 m at 126.71 g/t Au, 46.3 g/t Ag, 0.99% Zn and 0.96 % Pb. A repeat sample of the interval graded 125.87 g/t Au which in conjunction with the high Ag, Zn and Pb values indicates the intersection is not a coarse or spotty gold effect but a very high grade Au in quartz-calcite vein in the country rock andesite similar to those mined at the Co-O mine to the south of Mahunoc.
Epithermal veins on the margins of diatremes are also a common ore environment elsewhere in the Philippines and SW Pacific. Testing for wider and/or stacked high grade Au in quartz-calcite veins hosted by structures within the andesite beneath the diatreme margin will be the highest priority target for the next phase of drilling.
==> picture [428 x 322] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 2 – Drill Hole Locations with Artisanal Workings (marked by black stars) and TMI Ground Magnetic Image of the Mahunoc Diatreme (red and white colours)
The ground magnetics and mapping suggest that the southern margin of the diatreme is a relatively flatlying apron shallowly overlying andesite wall rock and that Au mineralisation in the diatreme within the “mineralised corridor “ is derived from veins in the structural zone in the underlying andesite.
DRILL HOLE INFORMATION
Nine holes were drilled for 3,073.9 metres as documented in the table below and shown in Figure 2. Further sampling of the holes will be conducted in the March Quarter.
| Hole | Easting | Northing | Elevation | Azimuth | Dip | Depth | Samples |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BDH-01 | 178025 | 917003 | 339 | 160 | -55 | 389.1 | 98 |
| BDH-02 | 178025 | 917008 | 339 | 215 | -55 | 545.1 | 91 |
| BDH-03 | 178025 | 917008 | 339 | - | -90 | 305.1 | 28 |
| BDH-04 | 178025 | 917008 | 339 | 360 | -55 | 356.1 | 15 |
| BDH-05 | 178125 | 916943 | 359 | 160 | -80 | 317.0 | - |
| BDH-06 | 177984 | 916790 | 340 | 160 | -60 | 265.8 | 89 |
| BDH-07 | 178690 | 917322 | 340 | 110 | -55 | 237.6 | - |
| BDH-08 | 177850 | 916445 | 304 | 340 | -45 | 317.1 | 14 |
| BDH-09 | 178567 | 916689 | 400 | 180 | -70 | 341.0 | - |
| 3,073.9 | 335 |
Table 2. Drill Hole co-ordinates (WGS84, 52 N) and orientation.
QUALIFIED PERSON AND COMPETENT PERSON STATEMENT
The information in this report relating to Exploration Targets, Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is based on information provided to Mr. Robert McLean, an independent consultant geologist and Competent Person, who is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr. McLean has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’., and as a “Qualified Person” under National Instruments 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”). Mr. McLean has verified the data disclosed in this release, including sampling, analytical and test data underlying the information contained in the release. Mr. McLean consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on the information he has been provided and the context in which it appears.
ABOUT RTG MINING INC
RTG Mining Inc. is a mining and exploration company listed on the main board of the Toronto Stock Exchange and Australian Securities Exchange Limited. RTG is focused on developing the high grade copper/gold/magnetite Mabilo Project and advancing exploration on the highly prospective Bunawan Project, both in the Philippines, while also identifying major new projects which will allow the company to move quickly and safely to production.
RTG has an experienced management team (previously responsible for the development of the Masbate Gold Mine in the Philippines through CGA Mining Limited), and has B2Gold as one of its major shareholders in the Company. B2Gold is a member of both the S&P/TSX Global Gold and Global Mining Indices.
ENQUIRIES
Australian Contact President & CEO – Justine Magee
Tel: +61 8 6489 2900 Fax: +61 8 6489 2920 Email: [email protected]
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This announcement includes certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Canadian securities legislation. Accuracy of mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates and related assumptions and inherent operating risks, are forward-looking statements. Forwardlooking statements involve various risks and uncertainties and are based on certain factors and assumptions. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from RTG’s expectations include uncertainties related to fluctuations in gold and other commodity prices and currency exchange rates; uncertainties relating to interpretation of drill results and the geology, continuity and grade of mineral deposits; uncertainty of estimates of capital and operating costs, recovery rates, production estimates and estimated economic return; the need for cooperation of government agencies in the development of RTG’s mineral projects; the need to obtain additional financing to develop RTG’s mineral projects; the possibility of delay in development programs or in construction projects and uncertainty of meeting anticipated program milestones for RTG’s mineral projects and other risks and uncertainties disclosed under the heading “Risk Factors” in RTG’s Annual Information Form for the year ended 31 December 2013 filed with the Canadian securities regulatory authorities on the SEDAR website at sedar.com.
Appendix 1: JORC Code 2012 Edition Table 1
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
| Criteria | Explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Sampling | Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut | The data reported is based on sampling of Diamond Drill |
| techniques | channels, random chips, or specific |
core of PQ and HQ diameter. The core was split with a |
| specialised industry standard measurement | diamond core saw and half core samples of 1 metre | |
| tools appropriate to the minerals under | length or less sent for analysis by an independent ISO | |
| investigation, such as down hole gamma | certified laboratory (Intertek Testing Services Philippines, | |
| sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). | Inc.) in Manila. | |
| These examples should not be taken as | ||
| limiting the broad meaning of sampling. | ||
| Include reference to measures taken to | The drilling was reconnaissance in nature and no field | |
| ensure sample representivity and the | duplicates or certified reference standards (CRM) were | |
| appropriate calibration of any measurement | submitted. The laboratory which analysed the samples | |
| tools or systems used. | conducted extensive check sampling as part of their own | |
| internal QA processes which was reported in the assay | ||
| sheets. | ||
| For the 341 samples submitted Intertek conducted 21 | ||
| Second Sample analyses (from second splits of the | ||
| coarse crushed sample prior to pulverising) and 37 | ||
| Repeat Sample analyses (a separate split and digest / | ||
| Fire assay from the pulverised material) in addition to 21 | ||
| assays of their own blank material and 41 assays of CRM | ||
| standards. The results indicate acceptable accuracy and | ||
| repeatability. | ||
| Aspects of the determination of |
Diamond drill core of PQ and NQ diameter were cut in half | |
| mineralisation that are Material to the Public | and half core samples submitted to the Laboratory. | |
| Report. In cases where ‘industry standard’ | Sample intervals were one metre or less. Samples were | |
| work has been done this would be relatively | crushed and pulverized (95%<75 um). Gold was analysed | |
| simple (e.g. ‘reverse circulation drilling was | by 50 g Fire assay/AAS and Ag, Cu, Pb, Zn and As by | |
| used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 | AAS. Residual half core has been retained for reference | |
| kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge | and future metallurgical testwork. Coarse rejects and | |
| for fire assay’). In other cases more | pulps will be retrieved from the laboratory and stored for | |
| explanation may be required, such as | future reference and umpire assays. | |
| where there is coarse gold that has inherent | ||
| sampling problems. Unusual commodities | ||
| or mineralisation types (e.g. submarine | ||
| nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed | ||
| information. | ||
| Drilling | Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, | Drilling was by PQ and HQ diameter, triple tube diamond |
| techniques | open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, | core. The hole collars were surveyed (GPS) but down |
| Bangka, sonic, etc.) and details (e.g. core | hole orientation surveys were not conducted and the core | |
| diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of | was not orientated. | |
| diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other | ||
| type, whether core is oriented and if so, by | ||
| what method, etc.). | ||
| Drill sample | Method of recording and assessing core | Core recovery was initially measured on site by trained |
| recovery | and chip sample recoveries and results | technicians and again in the core shed by the core shed |
| assessed. | geologist. Any core loss is measured, the percentage | |
| calculated and both are recorded in the Geotech log. In | ||
| instances where core breaks off before the bottom of the | ||
| hole leading to “apparent poor recovery” followed by a | ||
| core run of > 100 % recovery the adjustment is made in | ||
| the records. The core recoveries in the nine holes drilled | ||
| were excellent with all holes individually averaging greater | ||
| than 98%and the combined average of all nine holes |
| Criteria | Explanation | Commentary | |
|---|---|---|---|
| being greater than 99%recovery. | |||
| Measures taken to maximise |
sample |
Drillers are informed of the importance of core recovery | |
| recovery and ensure representative nature | and all care is taken to ensure maximum recovery of | ||
| of the samples. | diamond core. | ||
| Whether a relationship exists | between | There is no discernible relationship between core recovery | |
| sample recovery and grade and whether | and grade and recoveries were uniformly very high | ||
| sample bias may have occurred due to | |||
| preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse |
|||
| material. | |||
| Logging | Whether core and chip samples have been | The diamond drill core is photographed and logged in a | |
| geologically and geotechnically logged to a | number of logging sheets including a geological log, a | ||
| level of detail to support appropriate Mineral | structural log and a geotechnical log, which is appropriate | ||
| Resource estimation, mining studies and | for mineral resource estimates and mining studies, neither | ||
| metallurgical studies. | of which have been undertaken at this stage. | ||
| Whether logging is qualitative or |
Most of the geological logging is a mixture of qualitative | ||
| quantitative in nature. Core (or | costean, | (descriptions of the various geological minerals and | |
| channel, etc.) photography. | features) and quantitative (numbers and angles of veins | ||
| etc). Photos are taken of all core (both wet and dry) which | |||
| can be considered quantitative. | |||
| The total length and percentage of the | All core is initially logged in the various logging sheets | ||
| relevant intersections logged. | noted above and intervals are marked out for sawing and | ||
| sampling. Not all core has been sampled to date. | |||
| Sub- | If core, whether cut or sawn and whether | Sample lengths are one metre (or less to coincide with | |
| sampling | quarter, half or all core taken. | lithological breaks). All core from mineralised zones and | |
| techniques | the immediate surrounding rocks was initially sawn in half | ||
| and sample | to provide a better surface for geological logging. Half | ||
| preparation | core is collected for analysis and the other half retained | ||
| for reference and or metallurgical testwork. | |||
| If non-core, whether riffled, tube | sampled, | All sampling reported is of diamond drill core. | |
| rotary split, etc. and whether sampled wet | |||
| or dry. | |||
| For all sample types, the nature, quality and | All half core samples were bagged, labelled and sent to | ||
| appropriateness of the sample preparation | an ISO certified independent laboratory where samples | ||
| technique. | are dried, crushed and pulverised to 95% of the sample | ||
| passing a 75μm sieve. | |||
| Quality control procedures adopted for all | The drilling was reconnaissance in nature and no field | ||
| sub-sampling stages to |
maximise | duplicates or certified reference standards (CRM) were | |
| representivity of samples. | submitted. The laboratory which analysed the samples | ||
| conducted extensive check sampling as part of their own | |||
| internal QA processes which was reported in the assay | |||
| sheets. | |||
| For the 341 samples submitted Intertek conducted 21 | |||
| Second Sample analyses (from second splits of the | |||
| coarse crushed sample prior to pulverising) and 37 | |||
| Repeat Sample analyses (a separate split and digest / | |||
| Fire assay from the pulverised material) in addition to 21 | |||
| assays of their own blank material and 41 assays of CRM | |||
| standards. The results indicate acceptable accuracy and | |||
| repeatability. | |||
| Measures taken to ensure that the | sampling | High drill core recoveries were achieved and no evidence | |
| is representative of the in situ | material | of down hole contamination during drilling noted. The half | |
| collected, including for instance results for | core samples can be considered representative of the | ||
| field duplicate/second-half sampling. | insitu material. |
| Criteria | Explanation | Explanation | Explanation | Commentary | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whether | sample sizes | are appropriate to | The sample size (mostly 1 metre of half core) used is | |||||||
| the grain | size of | the | material being | suitable in respect to the grain size of the mineralisation. | ||||||
| sampled. | ||||||||||
| Quality of | The nature, | quality and | appropriateness of | The assay techniques used for the assay results reported | ||||||
| assay data | the assaying and | laboratory | procedures | herein are international standard and can be considered | ||||||
| & lab tests | used and |
whether | the | technique is |
total. Gold was analysed by 50 g fire assay and the other | |||||
| considered partial or | total. | elements by AAS. | ||||||||
| For geophysical |
tools, | spectrometers, | No geophysical tools, spectrometers, hand held XRF | |||||||
| handheld | XRF instruments, |
etc., | the | instruments etc were used for any analysis or observation | ||||||
| parameters | used |
in | determining |
the | reported herein. | |||||
| analysis | including instrument | make | and | |||||||
| model, reading times, | calibrations factors | |||||||||
| applied and | their derivation, | etc. | ||||||||
| Nature | of | quality |
control | procedures | The drilling was reconnaissance in nature and no field | |||||
| adopted (e.g. standards, blanks, duplicates, | duplicates or certified reference standards (CRM) were | |||||||||
| external | laboratory | checks) and whether | submitted. The laboratory which analysed the samples | |||||||
| acceptable | levels of | accuracy (i.e. lack of | conducted their own extensive check sampling as part of | |||||||
| bias) and | precision have been established. | their own internal QA processes which is reported in the | ||||||||
| assay sheets. For the 341 samples submitted Intertek | ||||||||||
| conducted 21 Second Sample analyses (from second | ||||||||||
| splits of the coarse crushed sample prior to pulverising) | ||||||||||
| and 37 Repeat Sample analyses (a separate split and | ||||||||||
| digest / Fire assay from the pulverised material) in | ||||||||||
| addition to 21 assays of their own blank material and 41 | ||||||||||
| assays of CRM standards. | ||||||||||
| The results indicate acceptable accuracy and repeatability | ||||||||||
| and are considered acceptable for the initial phase of | ||||||||||
| reconnaissance drilling. | ||||||||||
| Verification | The verification of significant intersections | The geochemical results reported herein and the | ||||||||
| of sampling | by either |
independent | or | alternative | calculated averages for different intervals were |
|||||
| and | company | personnel. | independently checked and calculated by two company | |||||||
| assaying | personnel. | |||||||||
| The use of twinned holes. | The drilling program comprised nine drill holes, none of | |||||||||
| which have been twinned. | ||||||||||
| Documentation of primary data, data entry | The diamond drill core is logged in significant detail in a | |||||||||
| procedures, | data verification, data storage | number of separate excel template logging sheets | ||||||||
| (physical | and electronic) protocols. | including: | ||||||||
| 1) a geological log of all core, recording mineralogy, | ||||||||||
| lithology, alteration, degree of oxidation and | ||||||||||
| mineralization; | ||||||||||
| 2) a structural log of all core, recording alpha and beta | ||||||||||
| angles, structure types, vein types and infill; | ||||||||||
| 3) a geotechnical log of all core recording RQD, defects, | ||||||||||
| fabrics; | ||||||||||
| 4) a geochemical log of assay results. | ||||||||||
| The drilling results reported are from the first phase of | ||||||||||
| reconnaissance drilling and the data has not been | ||||||||||
| incorporated into a dedicated Project computer database | ||||||||||
| at this stage. All logging and assay data has been | ||||||||||
| validated and archived and is available for future | ||||||||||
| reference. Hard copies of all logging sheets are kept at | ||||||||||
| both the Project office in Bunawan town and the Davao | ||||||||||
| and Perth offices. |
| Criteria | Explanation | Commentary | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Remnant half core and the coarse rejects and sample | |||||
| pulps returned from the laboratory are kept in locked | |||||
| storage at the Company’s core yard at Bunawan. | |||||
| Discuss any adjustment to assay data. | The results reported herein include averages calculated | ||||
| from separate contiguous one metre intervals. No top or | |||||
| bottom cut of any assays has been applied. | |||||
| Location of | Accuracy and | quality of surveys used to | Drill hole collars were sited with a hand held GPS with an | ||
| data points | locate drill holes (collar and | down-hole | accuracy of +/- 5 metres. No down hole orientation | ||
| surveys), trenches, mine workings and | survey was conducted. | ||||
| other locations | used in Mineral Resource | ||||
| estimation. | |||||
| Specification of | the grid system used. | Co-ordinates are on a UTM Grid; WGS84 (52N). | |||
| Quality and | adequacy of | topographic | The Bunawan area is moderately hilly. The collar | ||
| control. | elevation for the drill holes reported herein is based on a | ||||
| reading from a hand held GPS and is consistent with | |||||
| government topographic maps. | |||||
| Data | Data spacing for reporting of | Exploration | The drill hole assay results reported herein are from | ||
| spacing and | Results. | reconnaissance holes drilled on separate discrete targets | |||
| distribution | rather than a regular grid. | ||||
| Whether the data spacing and | distribution is | The Bunawan Project is at an early stage and drill holes | |||
| sufficient to |
establish the | degree of | are at variable spacing aimed at testing discrete zones of | ||
| geological and | grade continuity | appropriate | mineralisation. No estimates of grade continuity, resource | ||
| for the Mineral | Resource and | Ore Reserve | or reserves are made. | ||
| estimation procedure(s) and classifications | |||||
| applied. | |||||
| Whether sample compositing | has been | No compositing of intervals in the field has been | |||
| applied. | undertaken. | ||||
| Orientation | Whether the |
orientation | of | sampling |
The drill holes reported are the first holes drilled at the |
| of data in | achieves unbiased sampling of possible | Bunawan project, and while mapped surface structures | |||
| relation to | structures and | the extent to | which this is | are generally ENE trending and most drill holes oriented | |
| geological | known, considering the deposit type | perpendicular to this trend it cannot be assumed at this | |||
| structure | early stage of exploration that the intervals reported are | ||||
| true widths of mineralisation | |||||
| If the relationship between | the drilling | As noted above, most of the drilling was conducted | |||
| orientation and the orientation of key | perpendicular to the main structural trend indicated in | ||||
| mineralised structures is considered to | surface geology but it cannot be assumed at this early | ||||
| have introduced a sampling | bias, this | stage of exploration that the intervals reported are true | |||
| should be assessed and | reported if | widths of mineralisation. | |||
| material. | |||||
| Sample | The measures taken to ensure sample | Chain of custody was managed by the company | |||
| security | security. | employees. Core was placed in core trays by the drilling | |||
| crew and kept at site under constant watch by Company | |||||
| employees prior to being transported from the drill site by | |||||
| Company employees in a Company vehicle to the core | |||||
| shed where core was logged and sawn core samples | |||||
| prepared for dispatch. | |||||
| Samples were packed in boxes and sent directly from the | |||||
| core shed to the laboratory sample preparation facility in | |||||
| General Santos town using a local transport company. | |||||
| Remaining core is kept in the Company core yard which is | |||||
| in a secure compound at Bunawan which is guarded at | |||||
| night. |
| Criteria | Explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Audits or | The results of any audits or reviews of | The sampling techniques and QA/QC data were reviewed by |
| reviews | sampling techniques and data. | Company management and an independent consultant. The |
| writer of this report is an independent consultant who has | ||
| reviewed all sample handling techniques and considers them | ||
| to be of industry standard and appropriate for this stage of | ||
| exploration. |
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results:
| Criteria | Explanation | Commentary | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mineral | Type, reference name/number, location | The Bunawan Project is covered by Exploration Permit EP- | ||
| tenement | and ownership including agreements | or | 033-XIII, Exploration Permit Application EXPA 37-XIII and | |
| and land | material issues with third parties such | Mineral Production Sharing Application APSA 03-XIII. Drilling | ||
| tenure | as joint ventures, partnerships, |
activity the subject of this announcement is within EP 033-XIII | ||
| status | overriding royalties, native |
title | which was granted on 18 August 2014 for a period of two | |
| interests, historical sites, wilderness | or | years, with the option to renew for an additional 6 years. | ||
| national park and environmental |
||||
| settings. | The National Commission on Indigenous Peoples (NCIP) | |||
| issued a Compliance Certificate to Bunawan in compliance | ||||
| with the FPIC Process and that the Indigenous Community | ||||
| has given its consent to the Project. | ||||
| The security of the tenure held at | the | The tenure over the area currently being explored is a granted | ||
| time of reporting along with any known | Exploration Permit which is considered secure. | |||
| impediments to obtaining a licence | to | |||
| operate in the area. | ||||
| Exploration | Acknowledgment and appraisal |
of | The only known previous exploration over the Bunawan | |
| done by | exploration by other parties. | project area was conducted by Sierra Mining Limited prior to | ||
| other | its merger with/ take over by RTG. This exploration included | |||
| parties | rock chip, stream sediment and soil sampling as well as a | |||
| ground magnetic survey and geological mapping all of which | ||||
| was reported to the ASX by Sierra Mining. | ||||
| Geology | Deposit type, geological setting | and | Mineralisation at Bunawan can be defined as” intermediate | |
| style of mineralisation. | sulphidation” or “carbonate-base metal” type epithermal Au- | |||
| Ag mineralisation associated with a diatreme breccia complex. | ||||
| Mineralisation types in the area include high grade Au in | ||||
| quartz-carbonate veins hosted by wall rock andesite and | ||||
| dacite as well as lower grade disseminated Au in “silica-matrix | ||||
| breccias” developed in the diatreme. | ||||
| Drill hole | A summary of all information material | to | The information contained in this report pertains to the initial | |
| Information | the understanding of the exploration | results of the first phase of reconnaissance drilling at | ||
| results including a tabulation of | the | Bunawan. The easting, northing, elevation, dip, azimuth and | ||
| following information for all Material | drill | hole depth of all holes is reported in a table within the report. | ||
| holes: | The depths of intersections are documented in the text. The | |||
| easting and northing of the drill hole collar |
location of the drill holes with respect to the diatreme complex (as indicated by ground magnetics) and artisanal workings are shown on a map in the report. |
|||
| elevation or RL (Reduced Level – |
||||
| elevation above sea level in metres) | ||||
| of the drill hole collar | ||||
| dip and azimuth of the hole |
||||
| down hole length and interception |
||||
| depth |
| Criteria | Explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| hole length. |
||
| If the exclusion of this information is | Location and orientation of all drill holes is reported. | |
| justified on the basis that the |
||
| information is not Material and this | ||
| exclusion does not detract from the | ||
| understanding of the report, the |
||
| Competent Person should clearly |
||
| explain why this is the case. | ||
| Data | In reporting Exploration Results, |
The results reported herein include averages calculated from |
| aggregation | weighting averaging techniques, |
separate contiguous one metre intervals. No top or bottom cut |
| methods | maximum and/or minimum grade |
of any assays has been applied. |
| truncations (e.g. cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. |
Where shorter lengths of high grade core occurs within wider zones of low grade the higher grades are noted as “including intervals” in the table within the report. |
|
| Where aggregate intercepts incorporate | ||
| short lengths of high grade results and | . | |
| longer lengths of low grade results, the | ||
| procedure used for such aggregation | ||
| should be stated and some typical | ||
| examples of such aggregations should | ||
| be shown in detail. | ||
| The assumptions used for any reporting | No metal equivalent grades are reported herein. | |
| of metal equivalent values should be | ||
| clearly stated. | ||
| Relationshi | These relationships are particularly | Due to the preliminary nature of the exploration it cannot be |
| p between | important in the reporting of Exploration | assumed that the intervals reported are true widths of |
| mineralisati | Results. | mineralisation. |
| on widths | ||
| and | If the geometry of the mineralisation | The drill holes reported are the first holes drilled at the |
| intercept | with respect to the drill hole angle is | Bunawan project, and while mapped surface structures are |
| lengths | known, its nature should be reported. | generally ENE trending and most drill holes were oriented |
| If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (e.g. ‘down |
perpendicular to this trend it cannot be assumed at this early stage of exploration that the intervals reported are true widths of mineralisation. |
|
| hole length, true width not known’). | ||
| Diagrams | Appropriate maps and sections (with | A map (plan view) showing position of the drill holes and |
| scales) and tabulations of intercepts | ground magnetic data is included in the report. | |
| should be included for any significant | ||
| discovery being reported These should | ||
| include, but not be limited to a plan view | ||
| of drill hole collar locations and |
||
| appropriate sectional views. | ||
| Where comprehensive reporting of all | The report documents the assay results from the first phase of | |
| Balanced reporting |
Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be |
drilling at Bunawan. Low grade sample results from adjacent rocks outside mineralised zones are not reported. |
| practiced to avoid misleading reporting | ||
| of Exploration Results. | ||
| Other | Other exploration data, if meaningful | All meaningful exploration data concerning the Bunawan |
| substantive | and material, should be reported |
Project has been reported either in previous reports to the |
| exploration | including (but not limited to): geological | ASX (by Sierra Mining Limited) or is in the current report to |
| data | observations; geophysical survey |
which this appendix is attached. |
| results; geochemical survey results; | ||
| bulk samples – size and method of | ||
| treatment; metallurgical test results; |
| Criteria | Explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical | ||
| and rock characteristics; potential |
||
| deleterious or contaminating |
||
| substances. | ||
| Further | The nature and scale of planned further | The attached report summarises the results of the initial scout |
| work | work (eg tests for lateral extensions or | drilling program at Bunawan. The results are considered very |
| depth extensions or large-scale step- | encouraging and further drilling is warranted but has not been | |
| out drilling). | planned in detail at this stage. | |
| Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas | ||
| of possible extensions, including the | ||
| main geological interpretations and | ||
| future drilling areas, provided this | ||
| information is not commercially |
||
| sensitive. |