RTG Mining Inc. — Regulatory Filings 2015

Aug 16, 2015

Level 2, 338 Barker Road Subiaco WA 6008 Phone: +61 8 6489 2900 www.rtgmining.com ABN: 70 164 362 850

==> picture [152 x 89] intentionally omitted <==

NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION TO UNITED STATES NEWS WIRE SERVICES OR FOR DISSEMINATION IN THE UNITED STATES

FURTHER HIGH GRADE INTERCEPTS IN THE NORTH MINERALISED ZONE OF THE MABILO PROJECT INCLUDING 54.10m at 3.39% Cu and 2.30g/t Au AND DEMONSTRATED POTENTIAL FOR EXTENTIONS TO THE NORTH

ANNOUNCEMENT TO THE TORONTO STOCK EXCHANGE AND AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES EXCHANGE 17 AUGUST 2015

The Board of RTG Mining Inc. (“RTG”, “the Company”) ( TSX Code: RTG, ASX Code: RTG ) is pleased to announce significant high grade gold and copper intercepts in the North Mineralized Zone of the Mabilo Project in the Philippines.

Drilling on the North Mineralised Zone commenced in June with initial drill holes designed to support the revised geological interpretation. Subsequent drilling on regularised sections has continued to return excellent results with the new interpretation in agreement with historically drilled oblique and off section initial exploration drilling phases.

The intercepts returned from a number of drill hole has identified multiple high grade zones within magnetite and an oxide zone extending down to interface with karstic marble and limestone. Drill hole MDH-111 which is incomplete, has been partially assayed returned 54.10m at 3.39% Cu and 2.30g/t Au and remains within mineralised magnetite.

The current resource remains open down dip, down plunge and along strike in multiple directions, with all mineralisation found to date being shallow enough to be amenable to open pit mining techniques.

Highlights of the drilling program include –

• MDH-105 drilled on the Southern most section on the North Mineralised Zone has successfully determined the down dip continuation of the new interpretation*.

23.15m at 2.33% Cu and 1.71g/t Au and 21.46g/t Ag from 111.55 meters downhole.

• MDH-106 drilled through the central part of the magnetic model intersected a wide interval of magnetite skarn*.

57.70m 1.93% Cu and 1.91g/t Au and 11.67g/t Ag from 71.00 meters downhole.

• MDH-107 drilled on the same section as MDH-105 intersected a wide interval of magnetite skarn*.

38.70m at 2.28g/t Au and 2.25% Cu from 82.40 meters downhole.

• MDH-111 is the Northern most drill hole drilled to date on the North Body with mineralisation strike remaining open in a Northerly direction*.

54.10m and 3.39% Cu and 2.30g/t Au and 14.64g/t Ag meters downhole.

*For true width disclosure see pages 4 to 7 attached.

ABOUT MABILO

The Mabilo Project is located in Camarines Norte Province, Eastern Luzon, Philippines. It comprises one granted Exploration Permit (EP-014-2013-V) of approximately 498 ha and two Exploration Permit Applications (EXPA-000188-V) of 2,737 ha and (EXPA 0000 209-V) of 498 ha. The Project area is relatively flat and is easily accessed by 15 km of all-weather road from the highway at the nearby town of Labo.

==> picture [418 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [418 x 36] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [418 x 36] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [418 x 36] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [418 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [418 x 36] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [418 x 36] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [418 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1. Location of drill holes reported in this release on RTP ground magnetic image.

Page 2

==> picture [417 x 22] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 22] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 22] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 22] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2. Schematic long section showing isotropic copper grade shells, the location of significant intercepts, with significant intercepts from this release highlighted.

==> picture [417 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 52] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 52] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 52] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 3. Additional areas of strike extension on North Mineralised Zone.

Page 3

Recent drilling has confirmed the re-interpretation of the North Mineralised Zone. The new interpretation highlights a number of areas where further drilling has the potential to increase the current North Mineralised Zone strike (Figure 3). Further strike extensions towards the North are supported by a number of small intercepts of magnetite skarn drilled off section and down structure. Similar to the South Mineralised Zone, further potential beyond the magnetic model remains untested toward Venida.

MDH-104

MDH-104 was designed to confirm the extension along strike and down dip of the magnetite skarn mineralization intersected in MDH-102 (ASX reported 3[rd] July 2015). Drilling intersected wide fault breccia zone from 94.70 to 159.90 meters (Figure 4). A narrow zone of silica-pyrite-magnetite skarn breccia (159.90 to 164.60m) and brecciated magnetite skarn (197.10 to 198.90m) was intersected within the fault zone. The fault position is analogous to the fault breccia within the Southern Mineralised Zone. Intercepts are reported as down hole. Due to faulted geology true widths have not been determined.

MDH‐104	From	To	Intercept (m)	Au **ppm **	Cu %	Ag **ppm **	Fe %	Mineralisation	Recovery (%)
	162.00	164.00	2.00	3.26	2.11	10.40	13.67	Pyrite‐Silica Breccia overprint	60.50
and	197.1	198.9	1.80	1.40	2.17	5.80	53.69	Magnetite Skarn	100

MDH-105

MDH-105 is located 40m to the South-East of MDH-104 on the next section (Figure 5). Drilling here intersected magnetite skarn with moderate to strong pyrite overprint and chalcopyrite from 111.55 to 133.35 meters. Intercepts are reported as down hole due to insufficient drilling in this part of the mineralized system to determine true widths.

MDH‐105	From	To	Intercept (m)	Au **ppm **	Cu %	Ag **ppm **	Fe %	Mineralisation	Recovery (%) 77.31
	111.55	134.7	23.15	1.71	2.33	21.46	36.72	Magnetite Skarn

MDH-106

MDH-106 was designed to infill and define the true thickness of the magnetite skarn. A broad interval of fifty seven (57) meters in approximate true thickness was intersected. Drilling on this section (Figure 4) follows up on two vertical drill holes MDH028 and MDH-020, with MDH-020 reporting high grade oxide and chalcocite near surface (Reported 5[th] December 2015 to ASX by Sierra Mining)

MDH‐106	From	To	Intercept (m)	Au **ppm **	Cu %	Ag **ppm **	Fe %	Mineralisation	Recovery (%)
	56.00	68.00	12.00	1.21	1.45	5.15	14.14	Garnet Skarn with Magnetite Veins	99.17

Page 4

including	61.00	64.00	3.00	2.59	2.71	6.92	20.82	Garnet Skarn	100.00
and	71.00	128.70	57.70	1.91	1.93	11.67	41.89	Magnetite Skarn	96.71
including	81.00	93.00	12.00	2.81	2.97	11.19	42.55	Magnetite Skarn	100.00
and _including _	112.00	116.00	4.00	3.52	3.34	16.78	50.03	Magnetite Skarn	87.50

==> picture [417 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 28] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 28] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 28] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 28] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 4. Schematic geology cross section MDH106 with intercept highlighted.

MDH-107

MDH-107 intersected a thirty eight point seven meter wide chalcopyrite-rich magnetite skarn. Mineralization was intersected from 82.40 to 121.10 meters (Figure 5). Magnetite-skarn is overprinted with intervals of coarse grained chalcopyrite responsible for very high grade massive chalcopyrite intervals including 1m at 27.03% Cu and 15.52 g/t Au from 114m. Drilling is in the preferred orientation to evaluate true width of mineralised magnetite skarn which is estimated to be 38.70m.

Page 5

MDH‐107	From	To	Intercept (m)	Au **ppm **	Cu %	Ag **ppm **	Fe %	Mineralisation	Recovery (%)
and	65.00	78.45	13.45	0.93	1.05	7.96	16.75	Oxidized Garnet Skarn	86.67
and	82.40	121.10	38.70	2.28	2.25	8.25	45.15	Magnetite Skarn	100.00
including	88.00	93.00	5.00	1.73	1.83	4.32	40.55	Magnetite Skarn	100.00
and _including _	114.00	115.00	1.00	15.52	27.03	46.30	31.50	Magnetite Skarn	100.00
and _including _	115.00	116.00	1.00	15.40	1.70	12.10	49.72	Magnetite Skarn	100.00
and _including _	116.00	119.00	3.00	2.17	2.07	4.13	53.01	Magnetite Skarn	100.00
and	121.10	132.20	11.10	0.84	0.64	6.60	23.13	Garnet Skarn with Magnetite Skarn	100.00

==> picture [417 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 28] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 28] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 28] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 5. Schematic geology cross section MDH105, MDH-107 and MDH-109 with intercept.

Page 6

MDH-109

MDH-109 (Figure 5) was designed to test up-dip extent and continuity of mineralization defined by MDH-107 and down dip continuity of MDH-045 (Reported to ASX 13[th] May 2013 by Sierra Mining). Drilling intersected a relatively thin oxide gold zone followed by copper oxide zone with strong copper depletion, true with has not been determined due to the extensive patchy oxidation of primary magnetite.

MDH‐109	From	To	Intercept (m)	Au ppm	Cu %	Ag ppm	Fe %	Mineralisation	Recovery (%)
	41.70	55.30	13.60	2.51	0.10	2.36	24.25	Oxide with pyritic overprint.	85.22
_including _	48.00	50.00	2.00	6.82	0.02	0.85	4.57	Oxidized bleached zone.	98.50
_including _	53.00	55.30	2.30	4.23	0.14	1.20	36.92	Pyritic overprint.	50.87

MDH-111

MDH-111 (Figure 6) is designed to follow up on a number of historical drill holes MDH36, MDH-50, MDH-52 and MDH-54 section which intersected magnetite and frequently terminated in marble. The new interpretation infers the historical drilling to be the interface of skarn with marble. Drilling the correct orientation has successfully intersected the true thickness of mineralization with drilling temporarily paused currently within magnetite skarn. True width has not been determined at this time as the drill hole is paused within mineralised magnetite skarn.

MDH‐111	From	To	Intercept (m)	Au ppm	Cu %	Ag **ppm **	Fe %	Mineralisation	Recovery (%)
	63.00	117.10	54.10	2.30	3.39	14.64	45.83	Oxide and Magnetite Skarn	84.14
including	65.00	70.00	5.00	3.76	3.92	10.97	26.65	Oxide and Magnetite Skarn	100.00
and including	86.00	95.00	9.00	1.99	6.52	27.79	35.67	Magnetite Skarn with	52.00
and including	105.00	111.00	6.00	3.33	3.83	22.79	54.78	Magnetite Skarn	95.83
and including	115.00	117.10	2.10	4.29	4.78	28.23	48.48	Magnetite Skarn	100.00

Page 7

==> picture [417 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 28] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 28] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 28] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 28] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [417 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 6. Schematic geology cross section on-going drill hole MDH-111 with intercept highlighted.

QUALIFIED PERSON AND COMPETENT PERSON STATEMENT

The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results at the Mabilo Project is based upon information prepared by or under the supervision of Robert Ayres BSc (Hons), who is a Qualified Person and a Competent Person. Mr Ayres is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists and a full-time employee of Mt Labo Exploration and Development Company, a Philippine mining company, and an associate company of RTG Mining Limited. Mr Ayres has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken, to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves” and to qualify as a “Qualified Person” under National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”). Mr. Ayres has verified the data disclosed in this release, including sampling, analytical and test data underlying the information contained in the release. Mr. Ayres consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and the context in which it appears.

Page 8

ABOUT RTG MINING INC

RTG Mining Inc. is a mining and exploration company listed on the main board of the Toronto Stock Exchange and Australian Securities Exchange Limited. RTG is focused on developing the high grade copper/gold/magnetite Mabilo Project and advancing exploration on the highly prospective Bunawan Project, both in the Philippines, while also identifying major new projects which will allow the Company to move quickly and safely to production.

RTG has an experienced management team (previously responsible for the development of the Masbate Gold Mine in the Philippines through CGA Mining Limited), and has B2Gold as one of its major shareholders in the Company. B2Gold is a member of both the S&P/TSX Global Gold and Global Mining Indices.

ENQUIRIES

Australian Contact President & CEO – Justine Magee

Tel: +61 8 6489 2900 Fax: +61 8 6489 2920 Email: jmagee@rtgmining.com

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This announcement includes certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Canadian securities legislation. Accuracy of mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates and related assumptions and inherent operating risks, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve various risks and uncertainties and are based on certain factors and assumptions. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from RTG’s expectations include uncertainties related to fluctuations in gold and other commodity prices and currency exchange rates; uncertainties relating to interpretation of drill results and the geology, continuity and grade of mineral deposits; uncertainty of estimates of capital and operating costs, recovery rates, production estimates and estimated economic return; the need for cooperation of government agencies in the development of RTG’s mineral projects; the need to obtain additional financing to develop RTG’s mineral projects; the possibility of delay in development programs or in construction projects and uncertainty of meeting anticipated program milestones for RTG’s mineral projects and other risks and uncertainties disclosed under the heading “Risk Factors” in RTG’s Annual Information Form for the year ended 31 December 2014 filed with the Canadian securities regulatory authorities on the SEDAR website at sedar.com.

Page 9

Appendix 1: Location of Reported Drill Holes

HOLE ID	Location		GPS	GPS	GPS	Orientation True Nth	Orientation True Nth	Depth
			Coordinates (UTM WGS84)
	Prospect		East	North	RL	Dip	Azi	E.O.H (m)
MDH-104	North	Resource	476021	1560166	103	-55.00	50.00	222.00
MDH-105	North	Resource	476048	1560136	107	-55.00	50.00	185.10
MDH-106	North	Resource	476053	1560193	105	-55.00	50.00	170.80
MDH-107	North	Resource	476084	1560161	106	-55.00	50.00	163.30
MDH-108**	North	Resource	476133	1560217	104	-55.00	50.00	123.60
MDH-109	North	Resource	476112	1560188	104	-55.00	50.00	111.20
MDH-110	North	Resource	476028	1560091	106	-55.00	50.00	149.1*
MDH-111	North	Resource	476059	1560254	103	-55.00	50.00	117.1*

*Drillhole on-going

**Drill hole did not intersect mineralisation

All co-ordinates in UTM-WGS84 (51 N). All collars have been surveyed using handheld GPS and will be subject to professional survey pickup at a later date using DGPS system.

Page 10

Appendix 1: JORC Code 2012 Edition Table 1 Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
Sampling	 Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels,		The assay data reported herein is based on sampling of diamond drill core of PQ, HQ and NQ
techniques	random chips, or specific specialised industry		diameter which was cut with a diamond core saw. Samples are generally of 1 m length,
	standard measurement tools appropriate to the		although occasionally slightly longer or shorter where changes in lithology, core size or core
	minerals under investigation, such as down hole		recovery required adjustments; samples are not more than 2 m length.
	gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc).
	These examples should not be taken as limiting the
	broad meaning of sampling.
			The length of each drill run is recorded and the recovery for each run calculated on site and
	 Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample		checked again at the core shed. Certified reference standards and blank samples were
	representivity and the appropriate calibration of any		submitted to assess the accuracy and precision of the results and every 20th sample was sawn
	measurement tools or systems used.		into two and the two quarter core samples submitted for analysis separately as a duplicate
			sample.
			Half core samples were cut and sent for analysis by an independent ISO-certified laboratory
	 Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that		(Intertek McPhar Laboratory) in Manila. Samples were crushed and pulverised (95% <75
	are Material to the Public Report.		μm). Gold was analysed by 50 g fire assay and the other elements including copper and iron
			by ICP-MS (Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry) or ICP-OES (Inductively
			Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometry) following a four-acid digest.
Drilling techniques	 Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open-hole		Drilling was by PQ, HQ and NQ diameter, triple tube diamond coring. The core was not
	hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc)		orientated.
	and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube,
	depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other
	type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what
	method, etc).

Page 11

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
Drill sample	 Method of recording and assessing core and chip		Core recovery is initially measured on site by trained technicians and by the supervising
recovery	sample recoveries and results assessed.		geologist. Any core loss is measured, the percentage is calculated and both are recorded in
			the geotechnical log for reference when assessing assay results.
			All care is taken to ensure maximum recovery of diamond core and drillers are informed of
	 Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and		the importance of core recovery. Any areas of poor core recovery are sampled separately
	ensure representative nature of the samples.		thus assay results can be directly related to core recovery.
			The majority of the mineralisation is in fresh rock where recoveries are greater than 90%.
			Most mineralisation occurs in wide intersections of massive magnetite skarn with relatively
			uniform copper and gold grades. Core loss occurs in fracture zones but is usually not a
			significant problem i.e. the core lost in fracture zones is unlikely to have been significantly
			higher or lower grade than the surrounding material. In the weathered hematitic oxidised
			zones some core loss is unavoidable, but overall recovery is generally >90% and the core
			loss is volumetrically minor in the mineralised zones. In areas of poor recovery, the sample
			intervals are arranged to coincide with drill runs, thus areas of different core loss percentage
			are specific to individual samples which can be assessed when interpreting analytical results
			and modelled in future resource estimation studies. Where an area of 100% core loss is
			identified the sample intervals are marked to each side of the zone and the zone is designated
			“No core” and assigned zero value in the various log sheets and geochemical database.
			There is no discernible relationship between core recovery and grade. The skarn bodies are
			relatively uniform over significant lengths and the copper and gold grades are not related to
			clay and fracture zones which are the main causes of core loss.
	 Whether a relationship exists between sample
	recovery and grade and whether sample bias may
	have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of
	fine/coarse material.
Logging	 Whether core and chip samples have been geologically		Diamond drill core for each entire drill hole was logged in significant detail in a number of
	and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support		logging sheets including a geological log, a structural log, a geotechnical log and a magnetic
	appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining		susceptibility log for the entire drill hole. Mineralised and sampled intervals are logged
	studies and metallurgical studies.		individually in a separate quantitative mineral log with percentages of the different copper
			minerals being recorded. The logging is appropriate for mineral resource estimates and
			mining studies.

Page 12

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
	 Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature.		Most of the geological logging is a mixture of qualitative (descriptions of the various
	Core (or costean, channel, etc.) photography.		geological features) and quantitative (numbers and angles of veins and fracture zones,
			mineral percentages etc.). The quantitative mineralisation log and the magnetic susceptibility
			log are quantitative. Photographs are taken of all core (both wet and dry) prior to the core
			being cut.
	 The total length and percentage of the relevant
	intersections logged.		All core, including barren overburden is logged in the various logging sheets noted above
			apart from the quantitative mineralisation log in which only the mineralised intervals sent for
			geochemical analysis are logged ingreater detail.
Sub-sampling	 If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half		All sampling data is from diamond drill core. Samples are of sawn half core except for
techniques and	or all core taken.		duplicate samples which are quarter core. Half core is bagged and sent to an ISO-certified
sample preparation			independent laboratory for analysis. The other half retained for reference and/or further
			testwork.
	 If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split,		Not applicable for diamond core drilling.
	etc and whether sampled wet or dry.
	 For all sample types, the nature, quality and
	appropriateness of the sample preparation technique.		All core samples were dried, crushed to 95% <10 mm and a 1.5 kg sub-sample is separated
			using a riffle splitter and pulverised to 95% <75 μm. A 50 g sub-sample is utilised as a fire-
			assay charge for gold analysis. The sample preparation technique and sub-sampling is
	 Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-		appropriate for the mineralisation.
	sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples.
			Blank samples and duplicate samples are submitted routinely to monitor the sampling and
			analytical process and to ensure that samples are representative of in situ material. One in
			every 20 samples of half core is sawn again to produce two quarter core duplicate samples
			which are submitted to the laboratory separately with different sample numbers. A blank
	 Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is		sample was inserted into sample batches at every 20thsample.
	representative of the in situ material collected,
	including for instance results for field duplicate/second-		The magnetite skarn mineralisation occurs in extensive zones of magnetite skarn with
	half sampling.		disseminated chalcopyrite, containing gold. The sample size of approximately 1 m core
			length is suitable in respect to the grain size of the mineralisation.
	 Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size

Page 13

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
	of the material being sampled.
			The sample size is considered appropriate for the material sampled. It is believed that grain
			size has no bearingon thegrade of the sampled material.
Quality of assay	 The nature, quality and appropriateness of the		All core samples were analysed at an ISO-certified independent laboratory. Gold was
data and	assaying and laboratory procedures used and		analysed by 50 g fire assay and the other elements including copper and iron were analysed
laboratory tests	whether the technique is considered partial or total.		by ICP-MS or ICP-OES following a four acid digest. The sample preparation and assay
			techniques are of international industry standard and can be considered total.
	 For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF		No geophysical tools were used for any analysis reported herein. Magnetic susceptibility
	instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining		readings are used in magnetic modelling but are not used to estimate magnetite or Fe content.
	the analysis including instrument make and model,
	reading times, calibrations factors applied and their
	derivation, etc.
	 Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g.		Quality control completed by RTG included analysis of standards, blanks, and duplicates.
	standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory		Commercial Certified Reference Materials were inserted into sample batches every 40th
	checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie		sample. A blank sample was inserted every 20thsample; the blank sample material has been
	lack of bias) and precision have been established.		sourced and prepared from a local quarry. One in every 20 core samples is cut into 2 quarter
			core samples which were submitted independently with their own sample numbers. In
			addition, Intertek conducted their own extensive check sampling as part of their own internal
			QAQC processes which is reported in the assay sheets. A record of results from all duplicates,
			blanks and standards is maintained for ongoing QA/QC assessment. Examination of all the
			QAQC sample data indicates satisfactory performance of field sampling protocols and the
			assaylaboratory.
Verification of	 The verification of significant intersections by either		Significant mineralisation intersections were verified by alternative company personnel.
sampling and	independent or alternative company personnel.
assaying
	 The use of twinned holes.		No twinned holes have been drilled.
	 Documentation of primary data, data entry		Data documentation, verification and storage is conducted in accordance with RTG’s
	procedures, data verification, data storage (physical		Standard Operating Procedures Manual for the Mabilo Project. The diamond drill core is
	and electronic) protocols.		manuallylogged in significant detail in a number of separate Excel template loggingsheets.

Page 14

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
			Logging is recorded manually on logging sheets and transcribed into protected Excel
			spreadsheet templates or entered directly into the Excel templates. The data are validated by
			both the Project Geologist and the company Database Manager and uploaded to the dedicated
			project database where they are merged with assay results reported digitally by the laboratory.
			Hard copies of all logging sheets are kept at the Project office in Daet.
			No adjustments have been made to assay data.
	 Discuss any adjustment to assay data.
Location of data	 Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill		Drill-hole collars are initially surveyed with a hand-held GPS with an accuracy of
points	holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine		approximately +/- 5 m. Completed holes are surveyed by an independent qualified surveyor
	workings and other locations used in Mineral		on a periodic basis using standard differential GPS (DGPS) equipment achieving sub-
	Resource estimation.		decimetre accuracy in horizontal and vertical position.
	 Specification of the grid system used.		Drill collars are surveyed in UTM WGS84 Zone 51N grid.
	 Quality and adequacy of topographic control.		The Mabilo project area is relatively flat with total variation in topography less than 15 m.
			Topographic control isprovided byDGPS surveying.
Data spacing and	 Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.		Drill holes are planned on a nominal grid with 20 m between drill holes on 40 m spaced lines.
distribution
			The drill hole spacing was designed to determine the continuity and extent of the mineralised
	 Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient		skarn zones. Based on statistical assessment of drill results to date, the nominal 40 x 20 m
	to establish the degree of geological and grade		drill hole spacing is sufficient to support Mineral Resource estimation.
	continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and
	Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and
	classifications applied.
			No compositing of intervals in the field was undertaken.
	 Whether sample compositing has been applied.
Orientation of data	 Whether the orientation of sampling achieves		No bias attributable to orientation of sampling upgrading of results has been identified.
in relation to	unbiased sampling of possible structures and the
geological	extent to which this is known, considering the deposit
structure	type.
			No bias attributable to orientation of sampling upgrading of results has been identified.
	 If the relationship between the drilling orientation

Page 15

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
	and the orientation of key mineralised structures is
	considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this
	should be assessed and reported if material.
Sample security	 The measures taken to ensure sample security.		Chain of custody is managed by RTG employees. Samples were stored in secure storage from
			the time of drilling, through gathering and splitting. Remaining core is kept in a secure
			compound at the Company regional office in Daet town and guarded at night. Samples are
			sent directly from the core shed to the laboratory packed in secured and sealed plastic drums
			using either Company vehicles or a local transport company. A standard Chain of Custody
			form is signed by the driver responsible for transporting the samples upon receipt of samples
			at the core yard and is signed by an employee of the laboratory on receipt of the samples at
			the laboratory. Completed forms are returned to the Companyfor filing.
Audits or reviews	 The results of any audits or reviews of sampling		The sampling techniques and QA/QC data are reviewed on an ongoing basis by Company
	techniques and data.		management and independent consultants.

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

Criteria	**JORC Code explanation **	Commentary	Commentary
Mineral tenement	 Type, reference name/number, location and ownership		The Mabilo Project is covered by Exploration Permit EP-014-2013-V and Exploration
and land tenure	including agreements or material issues with third		Permit Applications EXPA-000188-V and EXPA-0000209-V. EP-014-2013-V was issued
status	parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding		to Mt Labo Exploration and Development Corporation (“Mt Labo”), an associated entity of
	royalties, native title interests, historical sites,		RTG Mining Inc. There is a 1% royalty payable on net mining revenue received by Mt Labo
	wilderness or national park and environmental settings.		in relation to EP-014-2013-V.
			Mt Labo has entered into a joint venture agreement with Galeo Equipment and Mining
			Company, Inc. (“Galeo”) to partner in exploring and developing the Mabilo and Nalesbitan
			Projects. Galeo can earn up to a 36% interest in the Projects, down to 200 m below surface,
			by contributing approximately US$4,250,000 of exploration drilling and management
			services for the Projects over a 2 year period.
			In November 2013, Sierra Mining Limited (“Sierra”), a wholly owned subsidiary of RTG,
			and Galeo signed a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) setting out proposed changes
			to the joint venture agreement to remove the depth limit of 200 m from the agreement and
			provide for additional drilling of 5,000 m below 200 m. The MOU also provides for Galeo
			to be granted its 36% interest up front with the ability for RTG to claw-back any interest
			deemed not earned at the end of the claw-backperiod. The amendments to the JV

Page 16

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
			Agreement are subject to Sierra shareholder approval.
			Sierra has also entered a second MOU with Galeo whereby Galeo can earn an additional
			6% interest in the joint venture by mining the initial 1.5 Mt of waste at Mabilo or Nalesbitan
			and other requirements including assistance with permitting. The MOU is subject to a
			number of conditions precedent, including Sierra shareholder approval.
	 The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting		The tenure over the area currently being explored at Mabilo is a granted Exploration Permit
	along with any known impediments to obtaining a license		which is considered secure. There is no native title or Indigenous ancestral domains claims
	to operate in the area.		at Mabilo.
Exploration done by	 Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other		The only significant previous exploration over the Mabilo project area was a drilling
other parties	parties.		program at another site within the tenement and a ground magnetic survey. RTG (or its
			predecessor Sierra) has reported this data in previous reports to the ASX and used the ground
			magnetic survey as a basis for initial drill siting. Subsequently RTG conducted its own
			ground magnetic survey with closer spaced survey lines and reading intervals which
			supersedes the historical program. There was no known previous exploration in the area of
			the reported Mineral Resource.
Geology	 Deposit type, geological setting and style of		Mineralisation at Mabilo can be defined as a magnetite-copper-gold skarn which developed
	mineralisation.		where the magnetite-copper-gold mineralisation replaced calcareous horizons in the Eocene
			age Tumbaga Formation in the contact zone of a Miocene diorite intrusion.
Drill hole	 A summary of all information material to the		All relevant drill hole information has been previously reported to the ASX. No material
Information	understanding of the exploration results including a		changes have occurred to this information since it was originally reported.
	tabulation of the following information for all Material
	drill holes:
	o easting and northing of the drill hole collar
	o elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea
	level in metres) of the drill hole collar
	o dip and azimuth of the hole
	o down hole length and interception depth
	o hole length.
	 If the exclusion of this information is justified on the		All relevant data has been reported.
	basis that the information is not Material and this
	exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the
	report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why

Page 17

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
	this is the case.
Data aggregation	 In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging		Not reporting exploration results.
methods	techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations
	(e.g. cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are
	usually Material and should be stated.
	 Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of		Not reporting exploration results.
	high grade results and longer lengths of low grade
	results, the procedure used for such aggregation should
	be stated and some typical examples of such
	aggregations should be shown in detail.
	 The assumptions used for any reporting of metal
	equivalent values should be clearly stated.		No metal equivalentgrades have been used.
Relationship	 These relationships are particularly important in the		The Mabilo drill have been drilled both vertically and inclined. The orientation of the
between	reporting of Exploration Results.		mineralised bodies is based on interpretation of geology from drill holes supported by
mineralisation			magnetic modelling which indicates that much of the mineralisation is dipping to the
widths and intercept			southwest.
lengths
	 If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the		The interpreted orientation of the mineralised bodies is based on magnetic modelling and
	drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported.		drill-hole data and is documented in the report. The fact that the intersections are in a dipping
			body and therefore not true widths has been reported.
	 If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are
	reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect
	(eg ‘down hole length, true width not known’).		No intervals reported can be assumed to be a true width of the mineralisation.
Diagrams	 Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and		Refer to figures within the main body of this report.
	tabulations of intercepts should be included for any
	significant discovery being reported These should
	include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole
	collar locations and appropriate sectional views.
Balanced reporting	 Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration		Not applicable.
	Results is notpracticable, representative reporting of

Page 18

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
	both low and high grades and/or widths should be
	practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration
	Results.
Other substantive	 Other exploration data, if meaningful and material,		All meaningful exploration data concerning the Mabilo Project has been reported in
exploration data	should be reported including (but not limited to):		previous reports to the ASX.
	geological observations; geophysical survey results;
	geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and
	method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk
	density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock
	characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating
	substances.
Further work	 The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g. tests		Drilling is ongoing at the Mabilo Project which will systematically test magnetic bodies and
	for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale		step-out targets along strike and between the North Mineralised Zone and the South
	step-out drilling).		Mineralised Zone as well as down-dip from these zones.
	 Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible		Refer to figures within the main body of this report.
	extensions, including the main geological
	interpretations and future drilling areas, provided
	this information is not commercially sensitive.

Page 19