RTG Mining Inc. — Regulatory Filings 2014

Oct 9, 2014

Level 2, 338 Barker Road Subiaco WA 6008 Phone: +61 8 6489 2900 www.rtgmining.com

ABN: 70 164 362 850

==> picture [151 x 88] intentionally omitted <==

NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION TO UNITED STATES NEWS WIRE SERVICES OR FOR DISSEMINATION IN THE UNITED STATES

RTG ANNOUNCES FURTHER HIGH GRADE INTERCEPTS AND EXTENSIONS TO KNOWN MINERALISATION AT THE MABILO PROJECT

ANNOUNCEMENT TO THE TORONTO STOCK EXCHANGE AND AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES EXCHANGE

9 OCTOBER 2014

The Board of RTG Mining Inc. (“RTG”, “the Company”) ( TSX Code: RTG , ASX Code: RTG ) is pleased to announce further high grade copper, gold and iron intercepts in both the North and South Mineralized Zones at the Mabilo Project in the Philippines.

Drilling targeted at extending the South Mineralised Zone to the North, has intersected further high grade supergene copper mineralisation. With a massive chalcocite intercept of 19.10 meters for 26.16% Copper & 2.18 g/t Au .

Further diamond drilling has continued to extend down dip extension of the South Mineralised Zone with further high grade intercepts. The system continues to remains open at depth.

Highlights of the ongoing drilling program include –

• MDH-073 intersected a chalcocite zone below a significant gold oxide zone.

16.65 meters at 4.45 g/t Au, 0.38%Cu and 44.3%Fe Approximately 6.13g/t Au Equivalent and 19.10 meters at 2.18g/t Au, 26.16% Cu and 28.4% Fe Approximately 47.65g/t Au Equivalent

• MDH-071 continued to extend mineralisation on the same section as MDH066.

35m meters at 2.79g/t Au, 4.47% Cu and 32.54% Fe Approximately 11.37g/t Au Equivalent

• MDH-067 continued to define the down dip and true width of primary magnetite mineralisation.

23 meters at 2.30 g/t Au, 1.76% Cu and 47.43% Fe Approximately 6.46g/t Au Equivalent including 9 meters at 4.12g/t Au, 3.24% Cu and 57.82% Fe Approximately 11.07g/t Au Equivalent

Work on the maiden resource for Mabilo is well underway. The resource will include seventy eight diamond drill holes and remains on track to be released in early November 2014.

Gold Equivalent grade calculations included in this release have been based on assumed commodity prices of US$1220/oz Au, US$6700/t Cu, US$17/oz Ag and US$90/t Fe and the following formula - (((GoldGrade(1220/31.103486))+((CopperGrade/100)6700)+((SilverGrade(17/31.103486))+((IronGrade/100)90)))/ (1220/31.103486)).

ABOUT MABILO

The Mabilo Project is located in Camarines Norte Province, Eastern Luzon, Philippines. It comprises one granted Exploration Permit (EP-014-2013-V) of approximately 498 ha and Exploration Permit Application EXPA-000188-V of 2,820 ha. The Project area is relatively flat and is easily accessed by 15 km of all-weather road from the highway at the nearby town of Labo.

Drilling is ongoing and currently focused on defining the SW down dip extent of the South Mineralised Zone and is targeting the oxide and supergene potential to the North of the South Mineralised Zone.

==> picture [417 x 272] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1 –Location of drill holes and sections reported in this release on RTP ground magnetic image.

==> picture [417 x 256] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2 – Schematic long section showing isotropic copper grade shells, location of drill holes and significant intercepts of this release and the extension to the magnetic model that has been achieved to date.

MDH-067

An angled hole drilled to test the down dip extent and true thickness intersected in MDH040 reported previously (ASX release by Sierra Mining 3rd April 2014). The hole intersected magnetite skarn from 138.00 meters to 178.40 meters with higher grade intervals characterised by well-developed chalcopyrite inter-grown with magnetite weakly overprinted by silica pyrite (Figure 3). True thickness of the magnetite skarn is approximately 32 meters.

**MDH-067 **	From	To	Intercept (m)	Aug/t	Cu %	Ag g/t	Fe %	Mineralisation
	151.00	174.00	23.00	2.30	1.76	4.58	47.43	Magnetite Skarn
including	155.00	164.63	9.63	4.12	3.24	6.13	57.82	Magnetite Skarn

Drill core recovery was greater than 88% for reported intervals.

==> picture [417 x 465] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 3 – Cross section of South Mineralised Zone showing MDH 067 and MDH 040 with geological interpretation and high grade intercept annotated (Section C of Figure 1).

MDH-071

Located 20 meters North East of MDH-066, MDH-071 is an angled hole drilled to further test the continuity of oxide and chalcocite mineralisation intersected in MDH066 (Figure 4). The drill hole intersected oxidised supergene zone 31.00 meters to 59.30 meters with massive chalcocite supergene from 59.30 meters to 63.00 meters. True thickness of the magnetite skarn is approximately 30 meters.

MDH-071	From	To	Intercept (m)	Aug/t	Cu %	Ag g/t	Fe %	Mineralisation
	31.00	66.00	35.00	2.79	4.47	14.3	32.54	Oxide Gold & Chalcocite Copper
including	38.00	59.30	21.30	3.26	0.50	16.6	35.76	Gold Oxide Zone
including	59.30	63.00	3.70	1.03	36.82	6.7	17.21	Chalcocite Zone

Drill core recovery was greater than 82% for reported intervals.

==> picture [417 x 392] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 4 – Cross section through MDH-071, MDH-029 and MDH-066 on geological interpretation (Section B of Figure 1).

MDH-073

An angled hole designed as an incremental 20m step North West of previously drilled MDH066 reported on (ASX release by RTG Mining 13[th] August 2014). Located 23 meters North East of MDH-029 at the Northern limit of the magnetic model (Figure 2). The drill hole (Figure 5) intersected an oxide zone from the Labo Volcanics overburden at 38.95 meters to 55.60 meters followed by a massive chalcocite zone from 61.90 meters to 81.00m meters with a bleach clay zone separating the two intervals. The bottom of the interval is garnet skarn from 106.00 meters 111.00 meters characterised by massive chalcopyrite garnet and magnetite veinlets. True combined thickness of the oxide mineralisation and chalcocite zone is approximately 48m.

48m.
MDH-073	From	To	Intercept (m)	Aug/t	Cu %	Ag g/t	**Fe % **	Mineralisation
	38.95	55.60	16.65	4.45	0.38	1.2	44.30	Gold Oxide Zone
and	61.90	81.00	19.10	2.18	26.16	9.2	28.44	Chalcocite Copper Zone
and	84.00	87.10	3.10	0.84	2.53	9.1	31.27	Magnetite Skarn
and	106.00	111.00	5.00	4.87	5.65	10.8	19.15	Garnet Magnetite Skarn

Drill core recovery was greater than 94% for reported intervals.

==> picture [417 x 441] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 5 - Cross Section of South Mineralised Zone showing MDH 073 with the geological interpretation (Section A on Figure 1).

Drillhole MDH-068 located 20m South West of MDH-073 has intersected weakly mineralised calc-silicate altered sediments with minor silica pyrite overprint and breccia zone. No significant assays are reported. The strike of mineralisation continues to vector in the Northern direction towards the North Mineralised zone.

COMPETENT PERSON STATEMENT

The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results at the Mabilo Project is based on information compiled by Robert Ayres BSc (Hons), a Competent Person who is Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Mr Ayres is a full-time employee of Mt Labo Exploration and Development Company, a Philippine mining company, wholly owned by RTG Mining Limited. Mr Ayres has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken, to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves” and to qualify as a “Qualified Person” under National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43101”). Mr. Ayres consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and the context in which it appears.

ABOUT RTG MINING INC

RTG Mining Inc. is a mining and exploration company listed on the main board of the Toronto Stock Exchange and Australian Securities Exchange Limited. RTG is focused on developing the high grade copper/gold/magnetite Mabilo Project and advancing exploration on the highly prospective Bunawan Project, both in the Philippines, while also identifying major new projects which will allow the Company to move quickly and safely to production.

RTG has an experienced management team (previously responsible for the development of the Masbate Gold Mine in the Philippines through CGA Mining Limited), and has B2Gold as one of its major shareholders in the Company. B2Gold is a member of both the S&P/TSX Global Gold and Global Mining Indices.

ENQUIRIES

Australian Contact President & CEO – Justine Magee

Tel: +61 8 6489 2900 Fax: +61 8 6489 2920 Email: jmagee@rtgmining.com

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This announcement includes certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Canadian securities legislation. Accuracy of mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates and related assumptions and inherent operating risks, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve various risks and uncertainties and are based on certain factors and assumptions. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from RTG’s expectations include uncertainties related to fluctuations in gold and other commodity prices and currency exchange rates; uncertainties relating to interpretation of drill results and the geology, continuity and grade of mineral deposits; uncertainty of estimates of capital and operating costs, recovery rates, production estimates and estimated economic return; the need for cooperation of government agencies in the development of RTG’s mineral

projects; the need to obtain additional financing to develop RTG’s mineral projects; the possibility of delay in development programs or in construction projects and uncertainty of meeting anticipated program milestones for RTG’s mineral projects and other risks and uncertainties disclosed under the heading “Risk Factors” in RTG’s Annual Information Form for the year ended 31 December 2013 filed with the Canadian securities regulatory authorities on the SEDAR website at sedar.com.

Appendix 1: Location of Reported Drill Holes

HOLE ID	Location	Location	GPS	GPS	GPS	Orientation True Nth	Orientation True Nth	Depth
			Coordinates (UTM WGS84)
	Prospect	Purpose	East	North	RL	Dip	Azi	E.O.H (m)
MDH-067	South B	Metallurgy	476099	1559728	113	-60	50	196.9
MDH-068	South A	Resource	475975	1559988	114	-60	50	224.6
MDH-071	South A	Resource	476038	1559998	108	-60	50	141.3
MDH-073	South A	Resource	476011	1560002	109	-60	50	124.5

MDH-068 Did not intersect significant assay results.

All co-ordinates in UTM-WGS84 (51 N). All collars apart from only surveyed by digital GPS at this stage.

Appendix 2: JORC Code 2012 Edition Table 1 Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Sampling	 Nature and quality of sampling (e.g.	The assay data reported herein is
techniques	cut channels, random chips, or	based on sampling of diamond drill
	specific specialised industry standard measurement tools	core of PQ, HQ and NQ diameter which was cut with a diamond core
	appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling.	saw. Samples are generally of 1 metre length although occasionally slightly longer or shorter where changes in lithology, core size or core recovery required adjustments;
	 Include reference to measures	samples are not more than 2 metres
	taken to ensure sample	length.
	representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used.  Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to	Half core samples were cut and sent for analysis by an independent ISO- certified laboratory (Intertek McPhar Laboratory) in Manila.
	the Public Report.	Samples were crushed and
		pulverised (95% <75 ɥm). Gold was
		analysed by 50 gram fire assay and
		the other elements including copper
		and iron by ICP-MS (Inductively
		Coupled Plasma Mass
		Spectrometry) or ICP-OES
		(Inductively Coupled Plasma
		Optical Emission Spectrometry)
		following a four-acid digest.
		The length of each drill run is
		recorded and the recovery for
		each run calculated on site and
		checked again at the core shed.
		Certified reference standards and
		blank samples were submitted to
		assess the accuracy and
		precision of the results and every
		20th sample was sawn into two
		and the two quarter core samples
		submitted for analysis separately
		as a duplicate sample.
Drilling	 Drill type (e.g. core, reverse	Drilling was by PQ, HQ and NQ
techniques	circulation, open-hole hammer,	diameter, triple tube diamond
	rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face- sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what	coring. Down-hole surveying was completed with a Reflex gyro down- hole instrument due to the highly magnetic mineralisation. The core was not orientated
	method, etc).
Drill	 Method of recording and assessing	Core recovery is initially measured
sample	core and chip sample recoveries	on site by trained technicians and

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
recovery	and results assessed.	again in the core shed by the core
	 Measures taken to maximise	shed geologist. Any core loss is
	sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the	measured, the percentage is calculated and both are recorded in
	samples.  Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse	the geotechnical log for reference when assessing assay results. In instances where core breaks off before the bottom of the hole leading to “apparent poor recovery”
	material.	followed by a core run of >100%
		recovery, an adjustment is made in
		the records
		The majority of the mineralisation is
		in fresh rock where recoveries are
		greater than 90%. Most
		mineralisation occurs in wide
		intersections of massive magnetite
		skarn with relatively uniform copper
		and gold grades. Core loss occurs in
		fracture zones but is usually not a
		significant problem i.e. the core lost
		in fracture zones is unlikely to have
		been significantly higher or lower
		grade than the surrounding material.
		In the weathered hematitic oxidised
		zones some core loss is unavoidable,
		but overall recovery is generally
		>90% and the core loss is
		volumetrically minor in the
		mineralised zones. In areas of poor
		recovery, the sample intervals are
		arranged to coincide with drill runs,
		thus areas of different core loss
		percentage are specific to individual
		samples which can be assessed
		when interpreting analytical results
		and modelled in future resource
		estimation studies. Where an area of
		100% core loss is identified the
		sample intervals are marked to each
		side of the zone and the zone is
		designated “No core” and assigned
		zero value in the various log sheets
		and geochemical database.
		All care is taken to ensure maximum
		recovery of diamond core and
		drillers are informed of the
		importance of core recovery. Any
		areas of poor core recovery are
		sampled separately thus assay
		results can be directly related to core
		recovery.

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		There is no discernible relationship
		between core recovery and grade.
		The skarn bodies are relatively
		uniform over significant lengths and
		the copper and gold grades are not
		related to clay and fracture zones
		which are the main causes of core
		loss.
Logging	 Whether core and chip samples	Diamond drill core for each entire
	have been geologically and	drill hole was logged in significant
	geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies.  Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc.)	detail in a number of logging sheets including a geological log, a structural log, a geotechnical log and a magnetic susceptibility log for the entire drill hole. Mineralised and sampled intervals are logged individually in a separate quantitative
	photography.	mineral log with percentages of the
	 The total length and percentage of	different copper minerals being
	the relevant intersections logged.	recorded. The logging is appropriate
		for mineral resource estimates and
		mining studies, neither of which are
		reported herein
		Most of the geological logging is a
		mixture of qualitative (descriptions
		of the various geological features)
		and quantitative (numbers and angles
		of veins and fracture zones, mineral
		percentages etc.). The quantitative
		mineralisation log and the magnetic
		susceptibility log are quantitative.
		Photographs are taken of all core
		(both wet and dry) prior to the core
		being cut.
		All core, including barren
		overburden is logged in the various
		logging sheets noted above apart
		from the quantitative mineralisation
		log in which only the mineralised
		intervals sent for geochemical
		analysis are logged in greater detail.
Sub-	 If core, whether cut or sawn and	All sampling data reported is from
sampling	whether quarter, half or all core	diamond drill core. Samples are of
techniques and sample preparation	taken.  If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry.  For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique.	sawn half core except for duplicate samples which are quarter core. Half core is bagged and sent to an ISO- certified independent laboratory for analysis. The other half retained for reference and/or further testwork.
	 Quality control procedures adopted	All core samples were dried, crushed
	for all sub-sampling stages to	to 95% <10 mm and a 1.5 kgsub-

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	maximise representivity of samples.	sample is separated using a riffle
	 Measures taken to ensure that the	splitter and pulverised to 95% <75
	sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling.  Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the	μm. A 50 g sub-sample is utilised as a fire-assay charge for gold analysis. The sample preparation technique and sub-sampling is appropriate for the mineralisation.
	material being sampled.	Blank samples and duplicate samples
		are submitted routinely to monitor
		the sampling and analytical process
		and to ensure that samples are
		representative of in situ material.
		One in every 20 samples of half core
		is sawn again to produce two quarter
		core duplicate samples which are
		submitted to the laboratory
		separately with different sample
		numbers. A blank sample was
		inserted into sample batches every
		20th samples.
		The magnetite skarn mineralisation
		occurs in extensive zones of
		magnetite skarn with disseminated
		chalcopyrite, containing gold. The
		sample size of approximately one
		metre core length is suitable in
		respect to the grain size of the
		mineralisation
Quality of	 The nature, quality and	All core samples were analysed at an
assay data	appropriateness of the assaying	ISO-certified independent laboratory.
and laboratory tests	and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total.  For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and	Gold was analysed by 50 g fire assay and the other elements including copper and iron were analysed by ICP-MS or ICP-OES following a four acid digest. The sample preparation and assay techniques used for the assay results reported
	model, reading times, calibrations	herein are of international industry
	factors applied and their derivation,	standard and can be considered total.
	etc.  Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g. standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable	No geophysical tools were used for any analysis reported herein. Magnetic susceptibility readings are used in magnetic modelling but are
	levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias)	not used to estimate magnetite or Fe
	and precision have been	content.
	established.	Quality control completed by RTG
		included analysis of standards,
		blanks, and duplicates. Commercial
		Certified Reference Materials
		(OREAS 901, 503, 15d, 504, 503b,
		502,501b,401,40,22c,15d & 112)

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		were inserted into sample batches
		every 40th sample. A blank sample
		was inserted every 20th sample; the
		blank sample material has been
		sourced and prepared from a local
		quarry. One in every 20 core samples
		is cut into 2 quarter core samples
		which were submitted independently
		with their own sample numbers. In
		addition, Intertek conducted their
		own extensive check sampling as
		part of their own internal QAQC
		processes which is reported in the
		assay sheets. A record of results from
		all duplicates, blanks and standards is
		maintained for ongoing QA/QC
		assessment. Examination of all the
		QAQC sample data indicates
		satisfactory performance of field
		sampling protocols and the assay
		laboratory.
Verification	 The verification of significant	The geochemical results reported
of sampling	intersections by either independent	herein and the calculated averages
and assaying	or alternative company personnel.  The use of twinned holes.  Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data	for different lithology types were checked and calculated by two company personnel.
	verification, data storage (physical	No twinned holes have been drilled.
	and electronic) protocols.  Discuss any adjustment to assay data.	Data documentation, verification and storage is conducted in accordance
		with RTG’s Standard Operating
		Procedures Manual for the Mabilo
		Project. The diamond drill core is
		manually logged in significant detail
		in a number of separate excel
		template logging sheets including:
		1) a geological log of all core,
		recording mineralogy, lithology,
		alteration, degree of oxidation and
		mineralisation;
		2) a structural log of all core,
		recording alpha angles, structure and
		vein types and quantity and vein
		infill minerals;
		3) a geotechnical log of all core
		recording RQD, defects, fabrics;
		4) a quantitative mineralisation log
		of all intervals sampled.
		5) a magnetic susceptibility log of all
		core;

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		6) bulk density data for selected
		samples representing domains
		identified by the project geologist
		Logging is recorded manually on
		logging sheets and transcribed into
		protected Excel spreadsheet
		templates or entered directly into the
		Excel templates. The data are
		validated by both the Project
		Geologist and the company Database
		Manager and uploaded to the
		dedicated project database where
		they are merged with assay results
		reported digitally by the laboratory.
		Hard copies of all logging sheets are
		kept at the Project office in Daet.
		The results from the two quarter core
		duplicate samples are averaged
		before being entered into the
		geochemistry database and reported
		so that all geochemical data
		represents the results from half core
		samples. The assay results reported
		herein include averages of the
		duplicate samples. Samples with
		assay grades below detection level
		are assigned a value of half (50%)
		the lower detection level value when
		averaging intervals for reporting. No
		top cuts of assay data have been
		conducted in the results reported.
Location of	 Accuracy and quality of surveys	Drill-hole collars are initially
data points	used to locate drill holes (collar and	surveyed with a hand-held GPS with
	down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation.  Specification of the grid system used.  Quality and adequacy of topographic control.	an accuracy of approximately +/- 5 metres. Completed holes are surveyed by an independent qualified surveyor on a periodic basis using standard differential GPS (DGPS) equipment achieving sub-decimetre accuracy in horizontal and vertical
		position.
		All of the holes reported herein have
		been surveyed with a handheld GPS
		with coordinates provided in
		Appendix 1. This survey will be
		superseded in due course by DGPS
		survey.
		Drill collars are surveyed in UTM
		WGS84 Zone 51N grid which is the
		grid for all project data.

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		The Mabilo project area is relatively
		flat with total variation in topography
		less than fifteen (15) metres.
		Topographic control is provided by
		DGPS surveying.
Data	 Data spacing for reporting of	The results reported herein are from
spacing	Exploration Results.	drill holes with variable spacing but
and distribution	 Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish	mostly on a nominal grid with 20 metres between drill holes on 40
	the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the	metre spaced lines.
	Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve	The drill holes are at variable spacing
	estimation procedure(s) and	designed to determine the continuity
	classifications applied.	and extent of the mineralised skarn
	 Whether sample compositing has	zones. Based on statistical
	been applied.	assessment of drill results to date, the
		planned nominal 40 x 20 metre drill
		hole spacing is sufficient to support
		future resource estimation. No
		estimated grades or resource
		estimations are included in this
		report.
		No compositing of intervals in the
		field was undertaken.
Orientation	 Whether the orientation of sampling	The assay data reported is from large
of data in	achieves unbiased sampling of	mineralised magnetite-garnet skarn
relation to	possible structures and the extent	bodies. There is no indication that
geological structure	to which this is known, considering the deposit type.  If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have	mineralisation grade within the bodies is affected by internal structures that affect the grade distribution, thus the sampling reported herein is not biased. This is
	introduced a sampling bias, this	confirmed by the similar results
	should be assessed and reported if	obtained from drill holes in multiple
	material.	orientations.
		There is no bias in the sampling
		reported herein related to drill-hole
		orientation. Orientation of some
		drill-holes has resulted in apparent
		thickness greater than the true
		thickness. The orientation of all holes
		and the interpreted orientation of the
		mineralisation is discussed in the
		report.
Sample	 The measures taken to ensure	Chain of custody is managed by
security	sample security.	RTG employees. Core trays are kept
		at the drill site under constant watch
		by Company employees prior to
		being transported from the drill site
		by Company employees in a
		Companyvehicle to the core shed

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		where core is logged, sawn and
		prepared for dispatch.
		Remaining core is kept in the
		Company core yard which is in a
		secure compound at the Company
		regional office in Daet town and
		guarded at night.
		Samples are sent directly from the
		core shed to the laboratory packed in
		secured and sealed plastic drums
		using either Company vehicles or a
		local transport company. A standard
		Chain of Custody form is signed by
		the driver responsible for
		transporting the samples upon receipt
		of samples at the core yard and is
		signed by an employee of the
		laboratory on receipt of the samples
		at the laboratory. Completed forms
		are returned to the Company for
		filing.
Audits or	 The results of any audits or reviews	The sampling techniques and QA/QC
reviews	of sampling techniques and data.	data are reviewed on an ongoing
		basis by Company management and
		independent consultants.

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Mineral	 Type, reference name/number,	The Mabilo Project is covered by
tenement and	location and ownership including	Exploration Permit EP-014-2013-V
land tenure status	agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings.  The security of the tenure held at	and Exploration Permit Application EXPA-000188-V. Drilling activity the subject of this announcement is within EP-014-2013-V which was granted in July 2013 for two years, with the option to renew for an additional 4 years. EP-014-2013-V
	the time of reporting along with	was issued to Mt Labo Exploration
	any known impediments to	and Development Corporation (“Mt
	obtaining a licence to operate in	Labo”), an associated entity of RTG
	the area.	Mining. There is a 1% royalty
		payable on net mining revenue
		received by Mt Labo in relation to
		EP-014-2013-V.
		Mt Labo has entered into a joint
		venture agreement with Galeo
		Equipment and Mining Company,
		Inc. (“Galeo”) to partner in exploring
		and developingthe Mabilo and

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		Nalesbitan Projects. Galeo can earn
		up to a 36% interest in the Projects,
		down to 200 metres below surface,
		by contributing approximately
		US$4,250,000 of exploration drilling
		and management services for the
		Projects over a 2 year period.
		In November 2013, Sierra Mining
		Limited (“Sierra”), a now wholly
		owned subsidiary of RTG, and Galeo
		signed a Memorandum of
		Understanding (“MOU”) setting out
		proposed changes to the joint venture
		agreement to remove the depth limit
		of 200 m from the agreement and
		provide for additional drilling of
		5000 m below 200 m. The MOU also
		provides for Galeo to be granted its
		36% interest up front with the ability
		for RTG to claw-back any interest
		deemed not earned at the end of the
		claw-back period. The amendments
		to the JV Agreement are subject to
		Sierra shareholder approval.
		Sierra has also entered a second
		MOU with Galeo whereby Galeo can
		earn an additional 6% interest in the
		joint venture by mining the initial 1.5
		Mt of waste at Mabilo or Nalesbitan
		and other requirements including
		assistance with permitting. The MOU
		is subject to a number of conditions
		precedent, including Sierra
		shareholder approval.
		There are no native title or
		Indigenous ancestral domains claims
		at Mabilo.
		The tenure over the area currently
		being explored at Mabilo is a granted
		Exploration Permit which is
		considered secure.
Exploration	 Acknowledgment and appraisal of	The only significant previous
done by other	exploration by other parties.	exploration over the Mabilo project
parties		area was a drilling program at another
		site within the tenement and a ground
		magnetic survey. RTG or its
		predecessor Sierra, has reported this
		data in previous reports to the ASX
		and used the ground magnetic survey
		as a basis for initial drill siting.
		SubsequentlyRTG conducted its own

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		ground magnetic survey with closer
		spaced survey lines and reading
		intervals which supersedes the
		historical program. There was no
		known previous exploration in the
		area where the drilling reported
		herein was conducted.
Geology	 Deposit type, geological setting	Mineralisation at Mabilo can be
	and style of mineralisation.	defined as a magnetite-copper-gold
		skarn which developed where the
		magnetite-copper-gold mineralisation
		replaced calcareous horizons in the
		Eocene age Tumbaga Formation in
		the contact zone of a Miocene diorite
		intrusion.
Drill hole	 A summary of all information	The sampling and geochemical
Information	material to the understanding of	information contained in this report is
	the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: o easting and northing of the drill hole collar	from the second phase of drilling at Mabilo which is ongoing. The easting, northing, elevation, dip, azimuth and end of hole depth of the holes reported herein is documented
	o elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea	in a table included as Appendix 1 to this report. Down hole depths and
	level in metres) of the drill hole	widths of intersections are
	collar	documented in the text. The easting,
	o dip and azimuth of the hole	northing, elevation and orientation
	o down hole length and	for all holes drilled at the Mabilo
	interception depth o hole length.  If the exclusion of this information	project has been reported in this and previous reports to the ASX.
	is justified on the basis that the	All relevant data has been reported.
	information is not Material and this
	exclusion does not detract from
	the understanding of the report,
	the Competent Person should
	clearly explain why this is the
	case.
Data	 In reporting Exploration Results,	Assays of samples of different
aggregation	weighting averaging techniques,	lengths are weighted for their length
methods	maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated.  Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths	when averaging assays for the large intervals reported herein. Where any element in an interval reported is below detection level it is assigned a value of half (50%) of the lower detection level when averaging mineralised intervals for reporting.
	of low grade results, the	Intervals with no core recovery are
	procedure used for such	assigned zero value when averaging
	aggregation should be stated and	results. No top or bottom cuts have
	some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail.	been made to the assay data. Composite intervals have reported

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	 The assumptions used for any	based on nominal cut-off grades of
	reporting of metal equivalent	0.5 g/t gold and 0.5% copper.
	values should be clearly stated.	The Mabilo skarn mineralisation is
		large with a relatively uniform grade.
		Higher or lower grade zones with the
		mineralised bodies are wider than
		sample intervals. The average grades
		reported herein are based on sample
		widths of average 1 metre width.
		Where an average grade contains a
		high grade intersection the high grade
		intersection has also been reported.
		No metal equivalent grades are
		reported herein.
Relationship	 These relationships are	The holes reported herein have been
between	particularly important in the	drilled both vertically and inclined.
mineralisation	reporting of Exploration Results.	The orientation of the mineralised
widths and intercept lengths	 If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported.  If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported,	bodies is based on interpretation of geology from drill holes supported by magnetic modelling which indicates that much of the mineralisation is dipping to the southwest.
	there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole	The interpreted orientation of the mineralised bodies is based on
	length, true width not known’).	magnetic modelling and drill-hole
		data and is documented in the report.
		The fact that the intersections are in a
		dipping body and therefore not true
		widths is reported and no intervals
		reported herein can be assumed to be
		a true width of the mineralisation.
Diagrams	 Appropriate maps and sections	Plan view maps showing locations of
	(with scales) and tabulations of	all holes reported along with
	intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views.	magnetic images are included in the report. The interpreted geometry of the host geology and the mineralised skarn bodies is illustrated in cross section.
Balanced	 Where comprehensive reporting of	The report documents the assay
reporting	all Exploration Results is not	results of intersections of the
	practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results.	mineralised magnetite skarn. Low- grade sample results from adjacent rocks outside the mineralised body are reported. Barren or very low grade results are not reported. Assays
		from drill holes which did not
		intersect mineralisation are not
		reported but their location is shown
		on plans in the report.

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Other	 Other exploration data, if	All meaningful exploration data
substantive	meaningful and material, should	concerning the Mabilo Project has
exploration data	be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey	been reported either in previous reports to the ASX or in the current report to which this table is attached.
	results; bulk samples – size and
	method of treatment; metallurgical
	test results; bulk density,
	groundwater, geotechnical and
	rock characteristics; potential
	deleterious or contaminating
	substances.
Further work	 The nature and scale of planned	The attached report is an interim
	further work (e.g. tests for lateral	report on an ongoing drilling program
	extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling).  Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is	which will systematically test magnetic bodies and step-out targets along strike and between the North Mineralised Zone and the South Mineralised Zone as well as down- dip from these zones.
	not commercially sensitive.