==> picture [234 x 129] intentionally omitted <==

ROX RESOURCES LIMITED ABN 53 107 202 602

ANNUAL REPORT

2013

	Page No
CHAIRMAN’S REVIEW	1
PROJECTS	2
DIRECTORS’ REPORT	16
AUDITORS INDEPENDENCE DECLARATION	27
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE	28
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Financial Position	39
Statement of Comprehensive Income	40
Statement of Cash Flows	41
Statement of Changes in Equity	42
Notes to and Forming Part of the Financial Statements	43
Directors' Declaration	72
Independent Audit Report to the Members of Rox Resources Limited	73
SCHEDULE OF MINING TENEMENTS	75
OTHER INFORMATION	76

CORPORATE DIRECTORY

Directors:

Mr Jeffrey Gresham Non-Executive Chairman

Mr Ian Mulholland Managing Director

Stock Exchange:

ASX Limited

Company Code: RXL (Fully Paid Shares)

Issued Capital:

Mr Brett Dickson Finance Director

Company Secretary:

590,809,744 Fully paid ordinary shares 3,750,000 3.8 cent, 26 September 2012 options 550,000 4.7 cent, 30 November 2014 options 8,500,000 2.5 cent, 30 November 2015 options

Mr Brett Dickson

Banker:

Westpac Banking Corporation 40 St George’s Terrace Perth WA 6000

Auditor:

Ernst & Young Ernst & Young Building 11 Mounts Bay Road Perth WA 6000

Telephone: (08) 9429 2222 Facsimile: (08) 9429 2436

Solicitor:

K & L Gates Level 32 44 St Georges Terrace Perth WA 6000

Telephone: (08) 9216 0900 Facsimile: (08) 9216 0601

For shareholder information contact:

Share Registry:

Computershare Registry Services Pty Ltd Level 2, Reserve Bank Building 45 St Georges Terrace Perth WA 6000

Telephone: (08) 9323 2000 Facsimile: (08) 9323 2033

For information on your company contact:

Principal & Registered Office:

Level 1 30 Richardson Street West Perth WA 6005

Telephone: (08) 6380 2966 Facsimile: (08) 6380 2988 Web: www.roxresources.com.au

CHAIRMAN’S REVIEW

Dear Shareholder

I am pleased to report that outstanding exploration success was achieved during the year on the Company’s key projects. This success gave rise to a significant increase in the Company’s share price against what have been very difficult market conditions for the exploration industry. Our exploration success allowed us to raise capital to aggressively pursue our work programs and given the small corporate overhead and administrative costs for the Company, a very high percentage of the funds raised were committed to direct exploration costs.

At the Mt Fisher project in Western Australia a diligent and focussed exploration program during the second half of 2012 culminating with a RC drilling program in December led to the discovery of a significant nickel sulphide occurrence at the Camelwood prospect. Extensive follow up RC and diamond drilling during 2013 drilling has recorded a number of significant intersections of massive and disseminated sulphides and defined mineralisation over a strike length of 1.2 kilometres and to a depth of 500 metres. The Company is currently completing a resource data audit and estimate of the Camelwood deposit together with some preliminary metallurgical test work.

In conjunction with the evaluation of the Camelwood discovery, a detailed geological, geophysical and geochemical assessment of the of the prospective ultramafic units at Mt Fisher has identified a number of highly prospective targets. Testing of these targets by aircore drilling has commenced and the potential for the discovery of further nickel sulphide deposits is high.

At the Reward project, located adjacent to the McArthur River zinc-lead mine in the Northern Territory, our joint venture partner, Teck Australia Pty Ltd, has made a significant discovery of high grade zinc-lead mineralisation at the Teena prospect. Following up some significant historic intersections three widely spaced holes have recorded intersections of greater than 13% zinc plus lead over downhole thicknesses of greater than 20 m. This drilling has indicated the potential for a significant zinc-lead deposit and further drilling will be carried out in 2014.

In addition to the significant advances made at both the Mt Fisher and Reward projects during the year the Company entered into a joint venture on the Bonya copper project in the Northern Territory. Significant results up to 33% Cu have been received from rock chip sampling of surface outcrops. An airborne VTEM survey will shortly be flown over much of project area to define conductive targets indicative of copper sulphides at depth.

In summary the results of the past year together with the planned exploration programs for the coming year place our Company in a very sound position. I would like to take this opportunity to congratulate and thank our small but highly effective exploration team who operate under the guidance of the Managing Director, Ian Mulholland, for the excellent work and strong results that have been achieved during the year.

==> picture [78 x 42] intentionally omitted <==

J Gresham Chairman

PROJECTS

INTRODUCTION

This has been a significant year for the Company with the discovery of the Camelwood nickel sulphide deposit in December 2012 at Mt Fisher in Western Australia, and in August 2013 the Company announced the discovery of the Teena zinc deposit at Reward in the Northern Territory. Both of these deposits have the potential to be developed into significant mines.

In addition the company has entered into a farm-in agreement over the Bonya copper project in the Northern Territory and is looking for a partner to help progress the Marqua phosphate project.

==> picture [451 x 385] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1: Rox Project Locations

PROJECTS

MT FISHER GOLD-NICKEL PROJECT, WA

In March 2011 the Company acquired its initial holding in the Mt Fisher project tenements from Avoca Resources and shortly after negotiated an Option to Purchase Agreement over the Fisher East tenements. Since that time much of the exploration effort had been targeted at gold mineralisation, but in mid-2012 two VTEM anomalies in the Fisher East area were evaluated by air core drilling and resulted in anomalous nickel values being detected.

Follow-up RC drilling in December 2012 at the Camelwood prospect resulted in the intersection of nickel sulphide mineralisation in all 5 RC holes drilled at that time. Since the discovery of Camelwood a further 28 RC holes (33 in total) and 41 diamond holes have been drilled for 5,200m of RC and 15,150m of diamond core, and resulted in the definition of nickel sulphide mineralisation over a 1.2km strike length and down to 500m depth, with the deposit still open at depth and along strike.

The project is located 500km north of Kalgoorlie and 150km north-east of Leinster in Western Australia (Figure1). The project tenements cover an area of 658.4 km[2] of the Mt Fisher Greenstone belt (Figure 2). In addition to the Camelwood nickel discovery Rox has defined a gold resource of approximately 86,000 ounces (Table 1) at Mt Fisher, Damsel and Moray Reef.

Significant drill results from Camelwood include:

MFED001: 11.4m @ 2.93% Ni, including 6.4m @ 3.8% Ni from 282.6m MFED002: 16.3m @ 1.79% Ni, including 6.3m @ 2.53% Ni from 211.7m MFED005: 5.7m @ 2.25% Ni from 382.0m, including 3.1m @ 3.37% Ni from 384.6m MFED010: 6.2m @ 3.30% Ni from 341.1m MFED014: 7.4m @ 1.89% Ni, including 1.5m @ 3.60% Ni from 130.6m MFED020: 5.3m @ 2.40% Ni from 269.7m MFED022: 2.8m @ 3.49% Ni from 246.2m MFED023: 4.6m @ 2.58% Ni from 377.4m MFED026: 2.7m @ 5.20% Ni from 483.0m MFED032: 3.4m @ 2.74% Ni from 312.7m MFED033: 3.2m @ 3.39% Ni from 265.2m MFED036: 1.6m @ 3.69% Ni from 569.0m

The Camelwood nickel deposit is a typical Archaean greenstone, komatiite-hosted, nickel sulphide type, similar to Kambalda and Cosmos. The nickel sulphide mineralisation occurs at the basal contact of a komatiitic (ultramafic) lava flow and shows high electro-magnetic (EM) conductivity (Figure 3). These deposits types are typically variable in grade and thickness and occur as shoots and lenses in the ultramafic lava channels (Figure 4). The nickel sulphide mineralisation occurs as two main types, massive and matrix/disseminated. The massive ore usually assays between 4 and 7% nickel, while the disseminated ore is usually between 2 and 3.5% nickel.

PROJECTS

==> picture [223 x 167] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [243 x 166] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [264 x 199] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [199 x 199] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [189 x 251] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [281 x 158] intentionally omitted <==

PROJECTS

The exploration potential for further nickel sulphide deposits in the Fisher East area is high, with detailed magnetics flown by the Company highlighting a number of prospective ultramafic units, some of which have coincident historic (nickel or copper) geochemical anomalism (Figure 5). There are also a number of airborne EM anomalies along the Fisher East belt that may represent sulphides. Deposits like the Camelwood nickel deposit rarely occur in isolation and a number of strong targets exist for discovery of further nickel sulphide deposits.

The Company plans ongoing exploration at Fisher East which will include:

Aircore drilling to test the VTEM, magnetic and geochemical targets shown in Figure 5
Resource data audit and estimate of the Camelwood deposit
Further deeper drilling at Camelwood to define additional resources
Testwork on the Camelwood mineralisation to establish metallurgical recoveries
Follow-up RC/diamond drilling of any defined targets from the aircore program

In addition to nickel sulphide exploration, the Company plans to follow up some of the gold targets that were identified during 2012 but are not yet tested by drilling.

PROJECTS

==> picture [437 x 623] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2: Mt Fisher Greenstone Belt and Regional Geology

PROJECTS

==> picture [276 x 287] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 3: Camelwood Cross Section 7035800N

==> picture [449 x 328] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 4: Camelwood Long Section

PROJECTS

==> picture [413 x 612] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 5: Fisher East Magnetics with VTEM anomalies and geochemical results shown

PROJECTS

REWARD ZINC-LEAD PROJECT, NT

The Reward project is located in the McArthur River region of the Northern Territory, adjacent to the McArthur River zinc-lead mine (Figure 1). Rox owns four tenements in the area which are subject to an Earn-in and Joint Venture Agreement with Teck Australia Pty Ltd (“Teck”), a subsidiary of the globally significant zinc, copper and coal producer Teck Resources Limited. The terms of the Earn-in require Teck to spend $5 million by 31 August 2014 to earn a 51% interest, with the option to increase their interest to 70% by expenditure of an additional $10 million by 31 August 2018. At the date of this report Teck have spent the required $5 million to earn its initial 51% interest and have advised Rox it will move to the next stage of spending an additional $10 million to earn an extra 19% interest.

In the previous year Teck located some unreported drill results that indicated the potential for a new and significant zinc-lead deposit at the Teena prospect, 10km due west of the McArthur River mine (Figure 6). Those drill results included:

11.3m @ 10.9% Zn + Pb, 14 g/t Ag from 908.8m
8.6m @ 9.84% Zn + Pb, 23 g/t Ag from 789.6m
3.8m @ 7.98% Zn + Pb, 4 g/t Ag from 629.2m
13.1m @ 6.02% Zn + Pb, 5 g/t Ag from 599.2m

In late June 2013 Teck commenced a drilling program on the Teena prospect . Results from the drilling have indicated the discovery of a significant zinc-lead deposit at Teena, with three holes reporting over 20 metres downhole intercepts of >13% Zn+Pb as follows:

TNDD009: 26.4m @ 11.6% Zn, 1.7% Pb, 13.3% Zn+Pb from 1060.1m, including 16.2m @ 14.9% Zn, 2.3% Pb, 17.2% Zn+Pb from 1070.3m

5.0m @ 9.5% Zn, 1.2% Pb, 10.7% Zn+Pb from 1121.0m

TNDD010: 20.1m @ 13.0% Zn, 2.0% Pb, 15.0% Zn+Pb from 944.3m, including 12.5m @ 16.8% Zn, 2.7% Pb, 19.5% Zn+Pb from 951.5m 3.2m @ 10.7% Zn, 2.0% Pb, 12.7% Zn+Pb from 988.8m 2.9m @ 7.6% Zn, 2.7% Pb, 10.3% Zn+Pb from 1125.4m

TNDD011: 20.3m @ 12.0% Zn, 1.9% Pb, 13.9% Zn+Pb from 901.0m, including

16.3m @ 14.3% Zn, 2.3% Pb, 16.5% Zn+Pb from 905.0m

1.7m @ 11.1% Zn, 2.1% Pb, 13.2% Zn+Pb from 937.3m

A fourth hole was drilled, but results are not yet to hand. The drilling has defined a zone of over 700m long (east-west) of mineralisation grading >13% Zn+Pb and over substantial downhole thickness (>20m) (Figure 7). Based on the previous historic drilling the mineralised zone could extend up to 1.6km in and east-west extent. In a north-south sense the mineralised zone extends at least 750m based on previous historic drilling (Figure 8).

PROJECTS

There is no doubt that the Teena zinc-lead discovery is a mineral deposit with the size potential to match other major deposits in Australia such as Century and Dugald River (Figure 9).

==> picture [231 x 173] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [341 x 257] intentionally omitted <==

PROJECTS

==> picture [231 x 173] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [341 x 317] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 6: Reward Project Tenements and Prospect Locations

PROJECTS

==> picture [341 x 293] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 7: Teena Prospect Drill Location Plan showing drill intercepts

==> picture [346 x 324] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 8: Teena Drill Cross Section 608400E

PROJECTS

==> picture [248 x 292] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 9: Zinc Deposits in Northern Australia

PROJECTS

BONYA COPPER PROJECT, NT

During the year the Company entered into an agreement with Arafura Resources Limited to farm-in to the Bonya exploration project in the Northern Territory (Figure 1). Rox can earn a 51% interest by spending $500,000 over two years (to 10 December 2014) with a minimum commitment of $150,000 in the first year, and can elect to increase its interest to 70% by spending an additional $1 million by 10 December 2016.

The project is located adjacent to the Jervois copper deposit and there is evidence for a similar style of mineralisation to Jervois on the project tenements, with numerous outcrops of copper oxides and carbonates in the host Bonya Schist unit (Figure 10).

Geochemical sampling by the Company returned results of up to 33% Cu and 55 g/t Ag from surface outcrops, with the most attractive targets being Green Hoard and Bonya. An airborne VTEM survey is planned for late in 2013 which should define conductive targets prospective for copper sulphides at depth.

==> picture [430 x 297] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 10: Bonya Project Tenements and Prospect Locations

The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results and Mineral Resources is based on information compiled by Mr Ian Mulholland BSc (Hons), MSc, FAusIMM, FAIG, FSEG, MAICD, who is a Fellow of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and a Fellow of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Mr Mulholland has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration, and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2004 Edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves”. Mr Mulholland is a full time employee of the Company and consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

PROJECTS

TABLE 1: MINERAL RESOURCES

Mt Fisher Gold, WA

Deposit	Category	Tonnes	Uncut	Uncut	Cut	Cut	Cut
			Grade (g/tAu)	Metal (Ozs)	Grade (g/tAu)	Metal (Ozs)	Value (g/tAu)
Moray Reef	Measured	25,700	10.84	8,957	7.96	6,577	80
	Indicated	4,900	6.09	959	5.95	937	80
	Inferred	1,200	3.87	149	3.87	149	80
	TOTAL	31,800	9.85	10,066	7.50	7,664	80
Mt Fisher**	Measured	119,600	3.72	14,304	3.60	13,843	50
	Indicated	56,700	3.62	6,599	3.62	6,599	50
	Inferred	38,900	3.44	4,302	3.41	4,265	50
	TOTAL	215,200	3.64	25,206	3.57	24,707	50
Damsel	Measured	26,600	2.91	2,489	2.68	2,292	30
	Indicated	143,300	2.47	11,380	2.39	11,011	30
	Inferred	556,100	2.34	41,837	2.26	40,407	30
	TOTAL	726,000	2.39	55,705	2.30	53,710	30
TOTAL	Measured	171,900	4.66	25,750	4.11	22,712
	Indicated	204,900	2.87	18,938	2.82	18,548
	Inferred	596,200	2.41	46,288	2.34	44,821
	TOTAL	973,000	2.91	90,976	2.75	86,080

Reported to the ASX on 10 February 2012. 0.8 g/tAu cut-off.

** This resource is located on a tenement over which Rox holds an Option to Purchase for $3.5 million, expiring 30 June 2014.

Myrtle Zinc-Lead, NT

									Rox Share**
Cut-off Zn+Pb%		Tonnes (Mt)			Zn+Pb %	Zn kt	Pb kt	Zn+Pb kt
	Category		Zn %	Pb %


3	Indicated	5.8	3.56	0.90	4.45	205	52	257
3	Inferred	37.8	4.17	0.95	5.12	1,575	361	1,936
TOTAL		43.6	4.09	0.95	5.03	1,780	412	2,193	49%
5	Indicated	1.2	5.38	1.42	6.80	64	17	81
5	Inferred	14.1	5.45	1.39	6.85	768	196	965
TOTAL		15.3	5.45	1.40	6.84	833	213	1,046	49%

Reported to the ASX on 15 March 2010.
** Teck Australia have earned a 51% interest by expending $5 million by 31 August 2014, and have elected to earn a 70% interest by expending a total of $15 million by 31 August 2018.

DIRECTORS REPORT

DIRECTORS

The names and details of the Company’s Directors in office during the financial year and until the date of this report are as follows. Directors were in office for this entire period unless otherwise stated.

Names, Qualifications, Experience and Special Responsibilities

Mr Jeffrey Gresham (Non-Executive Chairman, appointed 1/10/2006) - B.Sc. (Hons), MAusIMM, MGSA, MAICD

Mr Gresham is a geologist with a distinguished industry career of varied exploration, operational and corporate experience both in Australia and internationally spanning more than 40 years. Mr Gresham is also a Non-Executive Director of Breakaway Resources.

Previously he was Managing Director of Titan Resources, an active nickel explorer in Western Australia, and roles prior to that have included Managing Director of gold miner Wiluna Mines Limited, General Manager – Exploration for Homestake Gold of Australia, and several senior executive roles with Western Mining Corporation (WMC) including Chief Geologist of the Kambalda Nickel Operations, and Executive Vice President Exploration for WMC’s Canadian subsidiary Westminster Canada Ltd.

Mr Gresham’s extensive professional experience covers numerous mineral deposit types and he has authored a number of technical and professional papers on the Kambalda nickel deposits and the Olympic Dam copper-uranium deposit, and has a B.Sc (Hons) degree from the Victoria University, Wellington, New Zealand.

During the past three years Mr Gresham has also served as a Director of the following other listed companies:

Breakaway Resources (appointed 01/10/2006)
Mr Ian Mulholland (Managing Director, appointed 27/11/2003) - B.Sc. (Hons), M.Sc. FAusIMM, FAIG, FSEG, MAICD

Mr Mulholland is a geologist with over 30 years broad experience in the exploration and mining industry in a number of commodity groups including gold, silver, copper, lead, zinc, uranium, nickel and kaolin. He has been Managing Director of Rox Resources since its inception, and prior to that he managed activities from grass roots exploration to advanced resource definition, feasibility studies and mining operations for a number of major, medium sized and junior companies including WMC, Esso, Otter Gold, Aurora Gold, Anaconda Nickel, Archaean Gold, Summit Resources and Conquest Mining. His strength is in bringing resources to economic fruition and his experience is particularly appropriate for his role with Rox.

Mr Mulholland has been involved in the Nimbus silver-zinc project, the Mt Martin, Mt Muro, Toka Tindung, Tanami and Mt Carlton gold-silver projects, the Murrin Murrin, Weld Range, Marshall Pool, Lawlers and Cawse nickel projects, the Valhalla and Olympic Dam uranium projects, and the Mt Windsor VMS copperlead-zinc projects.

Mr Mulholland has a B.Sc. (Hons), Geology from the University of Sydney and a M.Sc. in Exploration and Mining Geology from the James Cook University of North Queensland. He is a Fellow of the AusIMM, the AIG, and the Society of Economic Geologists.

Mr Mulholland has not been a director of any other listed company in the last three years.

DIRECTORS REPORT

Mr Brett Dickson (Executive Company Secretary, appointed director 31/03/2010) - B.Bus, CPA

Mr Dickson has over 20 years experience in the financial management of companies, principally companies in early stage development of its resource or production, and offers broad financial management skills. He has been Company Secretary and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) for a number of successful resource companies listed on the ASX, and in addition to Rox Resources currently also acts as Company Secretary and CFO for Azure Minerals Limited.

Mr Dickson has not been a director of any other listed company in the last three years.

Interest in the Share and Options of the Company

As at the date of this report, the interest of the Directors in the shares and options of Rox Resources Limited were:

	Ordinary Shares	Listed Options	Unlisted Options
J Gresham I Mulholland B Dickson	2,059,501 11,080,708 5,250,000	- - -	- 5,000,000 2,500,000

LOSS PER SHARE

Basic and Diluted Loss per share 2013: (1.14 cents) 2012: (0.85 cents)

DIVIDENDS

No amounts have been paid or declared by way of dividend of the Company since the date of incorporation and the Directors do not recommend the payment of any dividend.

OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW

Corporate Structure

Rox Resources Limited is a company limited by shares which is incorporated and domiciled in Australia.

Nature of Operations and Principal Activities

The principal activity of the Company Entity during the year was mineral exploration.

Results from Operations and Financial Position

During the period the Company has incurred a net loss after tax for the year ended 30 June 2013 of $5,606,108 (2012 $3,359,215). The loss includes exploration expenditure charged direct to the profit and loss account of $4,560,459 (2012: $2,606,221). Net cash outflows from operating activities were $4,376,005 (2012: $2,954,282).

At 30 June 2013 the Company had cash on hand of $2,963,670 (2012: $1,309,547). The Directors believe the Company maintains a sound capital structure and is in a good position to progress its projects.

Review of Operations

During the year the company focussed its exploration activities on the Mt Fisher project in Western Australia where it discovered The Camelwood nickel deposit. In addition Teck Australia Pty Ltd commenced drilling at the Teena deposit which remained in progress at 30 June 2013.

For further information on these projects please refer to the project review within this Annual report.

DIRECTORS REPORT

Employees

At 30 June 2013 the Company had four fulltime and three casual employees (2012: three employees).

RISK MANAGEMENT

The Company takes a proactive approach to risk management. The Board is responsible for ensuring that risks, and also opportunities, are identified on a timely basis and the Company’s objectives and activities are aligned with the risks and opportunities identified by the Board.

The Company believes that it is important for all Board members to be part of this process, and as such the Board has not established a separate risk management committee.

The Board has a number of mechanisms in place to ensure that management’s objectives and activities are aligned with the risks identified by the Board. These include the following:

Board approval of a strategic plan, which encompasses the Company’s vision, mission and strategy statements, designed to meet stakeholders needs and manage business risk;
Implementation of Board approved budgets and Board monitoring of progress against those budgets.

DIRECTORS’ MEETINGS

The number of meetings of Directors (including meetings of committees of Directors) held during the year and the number of meetings attended by each Director was as follows:

	Directors’ Normal Meetings	Directors’ Normal Meetings	Directors’ Audit Meetings	Directors’ Audit Meetings	Directors’ Remuneration Meetings	Directors’ Remuneration Meetings	Directors’ Nomination	Directors’ Nomination
	No. Eligible	No. Attended	No. Eligible	No. Attended	No. Eligible	No. Attended	No. Eligible	No. Attended
J Gresham	10	10	2	2	1	1	-	-
I Mulholland	10	10	2	2	1	1	-	-
B Dickson	10	10	2	2	1	1	-	-

Committee Membership

As at the date of this report, the Company does not have separately constituted Audit, Nomination and Remuneration Committees. The full board acts as those committees under specific charters.

SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN STATE OF AFFAIRS

The following cash changes occurred during the year:

$1,488,642 (net of transaction costs) was raised through the completion of a share purchase plan ($1,338,642) and an issue of shares ($150,000) at $0.015.
$4,613,300 (net of transaction costs) was raised through the issue of 90,000,000 shares at $0.055 each.

There were no other significant changes in the state of affairs of the Company during the year.

MATTERS SUBSEQUENT TO THE END OF THE FINANCIAL YEAR

Since the end of the financial year Teck Australia Pty Ltd (“Teck”) has reached the first stage expenditure of $5 million on the Reward zinc project in the Northern Territory, and has earned a 51% interest in the project. Teck has also exercised its exclusive right to earn an additional 19% interest (to hold an aggregate interest of 70%) by incurring additional expenditure of $10 million by 31 August 2018.

DIRECTORS REPORT

No other matter or circumstance has arisen since the end of the financial year which significantly affected or may significantly affect the operations of the Company, the results of those operations or the state of affairs of the Company in subsequent financial periods.

ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES

The Company carries out mineral exploration at its various projects which are subject to environmental regulations under both Commonwealth and State legislation. During the financial year there has been no breach of these regulations.

LIKELY DEVELOPMENTS AND EXPECTED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The Company will continue to explore of its mineral tenements, with particular focus on the Fisher East nickel area. Its joint venture earn-in partner, Teck Australia Pty Ltd, will continue to fund zinc exploration at the Reward project. Given the nature of exploration the results of those activities cannot be predicted.

INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

During the year the Company paid an insurance premium to insure certain officers of the Company. The officers of the Company covered by the insurance policy include the Directors and the Company Secretary named in this report.

The Director and Officers Liability insurance provides cover against all costs and expenses that may be incurred in defending civil or criminal proceedings that fall within the scope of the indemnity and that may be brought against the Directors and officers in their capacity as officers of the Company. The insurance policy does not contain details of the premium paid in respect of individual officers of the Company. Disclosure of the nature of the liability cover and the amount of the premium is subject to a confidentiality clause under the insurance policy.

The Company has not entered into any agreement to indemnify the auditor.

SHARE OPTIONS

At the reporting date there were 8,500,000 unlisted options exercisable at $0.025 and 550,000 unlisted options exercisable at $0.047. During the year 3,750,000 options lapsed. Refer to note 18 of the Financial Statements for further details on options outstanding.

Option holders do not have any right, by virtue of the option, to participate in any share issue of the Company or any related body corporate or in the interest issue of any other registered scheme.

AUDITOR INDEPENDENCE AND NON-AUDIT SERVICES

Section 307C of the Corporations Act 2001 requires the Company’s Auditors to provide the Directors of Rox Resources Limited with an Independence Declaration in relation to the audit of the full-year financial report. This report has been received and is attached to the Directors Report at page 27.

NON AUDIT SERVICES

The following non-audit services were provided by the entity’s auditor, Ernst & Young. The Directors are satisfied that the provision of non-audit services is compatible with the general standard of independence for auditors imposed by the Corporations Act. The nature and scope of each type of non-audit services provided means that auditor independence was not compromised.

Ernst & Young received or are due to receive the following amounts for the provision of non-audit services:

Tax compliance services $10,000

DIRECTORS REPORT

REMUNERATION REPORT (AUDITED)

This Remuneration Report outlines the Director and executive remuneration arrangements of the Company in accordance with the requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 and its Regulations. For the purposes of this report Key Management Personnel (KMP) of the Company are defined as those persons having authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the major activities of the Company, directly or indirectly.

For the purposes of this report, the term ‘executive’ encompasses the Managing Director and Company Secretary of the Company.

Details of Key Management Personnel

Jeffrey Gresham Non-executive Chairman ( appointed 1 October 2006) Ian Mulholland Managing Director ( appointed 27 November 2003) Brett Dickson Executive Director and Company Secretary (appointed director 31 March 2010)

There were no changes of KMP after reporting date and before the date the financial report was authorised for issue.

Remuneration Committee

The full Board acts as the Remuneration Committee and is responsible for determining and reviewing compensation arrangements for the Directors, the Managing Director (MD) and the senior management team.

The Board assesses the appropriateness of the nature and amount of remuneration of Directors and senior managers on a periodic basis by reference to relevant employment market conditions with the overall objective of ensuring maximum stakeholder benefit from the retention of a high quality board and executive team.

Remuneration Philosophy

The performance of the Company depends upon the quality of its Directors and executives. To prosper, the Company must attract, motivate and retain highly skilled Directors and executives.

To this end, the Company embodies the following principles in its remuneration framework:

Provide competitive rewards to attract high calibre executives
Establish appropriate hurdles for variable executive remuneration
Encouragement for Directors to sacrifice a portion of their fees to acquire shares in the Company at market price

Remuneration Structure

In accordance with best practice corporate governance, the structure of Non-Executive Director and Senior Manager remuneration is separate and distinct.

Non-Executive Director Remuneration

Objective

The Board seeks to set aggregate remuneration at a level which provides the Company with the ability to attract and retain Directors of the highest calibre, whilst keeping costs acceptable to shareholders.

DIRECTORS REPORT

Structure

The Constitution and the ASX Listing Rules specify that the aggregate remuneration of Non-Executive Directors shall be determined from time to time by a general meeting. An amount not exceeding the amount determined is then divided between the Directors as agreed. The latest determination was in 2004 when shareholders approved an aggregate remuneration of $150,000 per year.

The amount of aggregate remuneration sought to be approved by shareholders and the manner in which it is apportioned amongst Directors is reviewed annually. The Board considers the fees paid to NonExecutive Directors of comparable companies when undertaking the annual review process.

Each Director receives a fee for being a Director of the Company. The remuneration of Non-Executive Directors for the years ended 30 June 2013 and 30 June 2012 is detailed later in this report.

Non-Executive Directors have long been encouraged by the Board to hold shares in the Company (purchased by the Director on market). It is considered good governance for Directors to have a stake in the Company whose board he or she sits. In addition long term incentives in the form of options may be awarded to Non-Executive Directors, subject to shareholder approval, in a manner which aligns this element of remuneration with the creation of shareholder wealth.

Senior Manager and Executive Director Remuneration

Objective

The Company aims to reward executives with a level and mix of remuneration commensurate with their position and responsibilities within the Company and so as to:

reward executives for company and individual performance against targets set by reference to appropriate benchmarks;
align the interests of executives with those of shareholders;
link reward with the strategic goals; and
ensure total remuneration is competitive by market standards.

Structure

In determining the level and make-up of executive remuneration the Board considered market conditions and remuneration paid to senior executives of companies similar in nature to Rox Resources Limited.

Remuneration consists of the following key elements:

Fixed Remuneration
Variable Remuneration – short term incentive (“STI”), and
long term incentive (“LTI”)

Fixed Remuneration

Objective

The level of fixed remuneration is set so as to provide a base level of remuneration which is both appropriate to the position and is competitive in the market.

Fixed remuneration is reviewed annually by the Board and the process consists of a review of individual performance, relevant comparative remuneration in the market and, where appropriate, external advice on policies and practices.

DIRECTORS REPORT

Structure

Senior managers are given the opportunity to receive their fixed (primary) remuneration in a variety of forms including cash and fringe benefits such as motor vehicles. It is intended that the manner of payment chosen will be optimal for the recipient without creating undue cost for the Company.

The fixed remuneration component of the most highly remunerated senior managers is detailed later in this report.

Variable Remuneration – Short Term Incentive (“STI”)

Objective

The objective of the STI program is to link the achievement of the Company’s operational targets with the remuneration received by the executives charged with meeting those targets. The total potential STI available is set at a level so as to provide sufficient incentive to the executive to achieve those operational targets and such that the cost to the Company is reasonable in the circumstances.

Structure

Actual STI payments granted to executives depend on the extent to which specific targets, set at the beginning of the review period, being a calendar year, are met. The targets consist of a number of Key Performance Indicators (KPI’s) covering both financial and non-financial, corporate and individual measures of performance. Typically included are measures such as contribution to exploration success, share price appreciation, risk management and cash flow sustainability. These measures were chosen as they represent the key drivers for the short term success of the business and provide a framework for delivering long term value.

The Board has predetermined benchmarks that must be met in order to trigger payments under the STI scheme. On an annual basis, after consideration of performance against KPI’s, the Board, acting as a Remuneration Committee, determines the amount, if any, of the STI to be paid to each executive. This process usually occurs in the first quarter of the calendar year. Payments made are delivered as a cash bonus in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year.

STI bonus for 2012 and 2013 financial years

For the calendar year ended 31 December 2012 the following key performance indicators were agreed for senior management, with the relative weighting of each shown in brackets.

Maintain significant (>$1M p.a.) third party funding for exploration at Myrtle. (10%)
Secure funding for continued progression of Marqua phosphate project, either through JV or other corporate activity. (10%)
Demonstrate potential for >500,000 ounce gold endowment at Mt Fisher project. (25%)
Continue to expand the Company’s project portfolio either by securing new project/s and/or additional areas at Mt Fisher. (5%)
Secure sufficient funding for ongoing company exploration programs. (20%)
Continued share price appreciation and market capitalisation, outperforming the “peer group share price index” by 20%. (30%)

DIRECTORS REPORT

For the calendar year ended 31 December 2013 the following key performance indicators were agreed for senior management, with the relative weighting of each shown in brackets.

Maintain significant (>$1M p.a.) third party funding for exploration on Reward zinc project. (5%)
Secure funding for continued progression of Marqua phosphate project, either through JV or other corporate activity. (5%)
Demonstrate potential for >500,000 ounce gold endowment at Mt Fisher project. (10%)
Demonstrate potential for copper resources at Bonya. (10%)
Demonstrate potential for nickel resources at Fisher East of >50,000t contained nickel. (20%)
Secure sufficient funding for ongoing company exploration programs. (20%)
Continued share price appreciation and market capitalisation, outperforming the “peer group share price index” by 20%. (30%)

The minimum amount payable for 2013 assuming executives fail to meet their KPI’s is nil and the maximum amount payable if all KPI’s are met is $75,000. There have been no alterations to the STI bonus plans since their grant date.

Variable Remuneration – Long Term Incentive (“LTI”)

Objective

The objective of the LTI plan is to reward senior managers in a manner which aligns this element of remuneration with the creation of shareholder wealth. As such LTI grants are only made to executives who are able to influence the generation of shareholder wealth.

Structure

LTI grants to executives are delivered in the form of options.

The options, when issued to executives, will not be exercisable for a price less than the then current market price of the Company’s shares. The grant of LTI’s are reviewed annually, though LTI’s may not be granted each year. Exercise price and performance hurdles, if any, are determined at the time of grant of the LTI.

To date no performance hurdles have been set on options issued to executives other than time based service conditions. The Company believes that as options are issued at not less than the current market price of the Company’s shares there is an inherent performance hurdle on those options as the share price of the Company’s shares must increase significantly before there is any reward to the executive.

Employment Contracts

The Managing Director, Mr Mulholland is employed under contract. The current employment contract expires on 1[st] January 2015, at which time the Company may chose to commence negotiation to enter into a new employment contract with Mr Mulholland. Under the terms of the present contact:

Mr Mulholland may resign from his position and terminate this contract by giving three months notice.
The Company may terminate this employment agreement by providing three months’ written notice. On termination on notice by the Company, the Company will pay Mr Mulholland an amount equal to the fixed component of his remuneration for the remainder of the term of the contract.
The Company may terminate the contract at any time without notice if serious misconduct has occurred. Where termination with cause occurs, the MD is only entitled to that portion of remuneration which is fixed, and only up to the date of termination. On termination with cause any unvested options he holds will immediately be forfeited.

DIRECTORS REPORT

The Company Secretary, Mr Dickson is employed under a service contract. The current contract terminates on 1 January 2015, at which time the Company may chose to commence negotiation to enter into a new service contract with Mr Dickson. Under the terms of the present contact:

Mr Dickson may terminate the contract by giving three months written notice.
The Company may terminate the service contract agreement by providing three months’ written notice. On termination on notice by the Company, subject to ASX Listing Rule 10.19 and section 200F(3) of the Corporations Act 2001, will pay Mr Dickson an amount equal to the fixed component of his remuneration for the remainder of the term of the contract.
The Company may terminate the contract at any time without notice if serious misconduct has occurred. Where termination with cause occurs, Mr Dickson is only entitled to that portion of remuneration which is fixed, and only up to the date of termination. On termination with cause any unvested options he holds will immediately be forfeited.

Remuneration of Key Management Personnel

		SHORT TERM		POST EMPLOYMENT	SHARE BASED PAYMENTS	TOTAL	PERCENTAGE
2013	Salary &	Bonus	Other1	Superannuation	Options		PERFORMANCE
	Fees	$	$	$	$	$	RELATED
	$						%
DIRECTORS
J Gresham	70,000	-	-	6,300	-	76,300	-
I Mulholland	275,000	35,625	-	25,000	18,770	354,395	15.3
B Dickson	-	17,812	144,000	-	9,385	171,197	15.9
TOTAL	345,000	53,437	144,000	31,300	28,155	601,892	13.6

		SHORT TERM		POST EMPLOYMENT	SHARE BASED PAYMENTS	TOTAL	PERCENTAGE
2012	Salary &	Bonus	Other1	Superannuation	Options		PERFORMANCE
	Fees	$	$	$	$	$	RELATED
	$						%
DIRECTORS
J Gresham	35,000	-	-	41,300	-	76,300	-
I Mulholland	255,000	24,000	-	45,000	3,091	327,091	8.3
B Dickson	-	12,000	144,000	-	1,546	157,546	8.6
TOTAL	290,000	36,000	144,000	86,300	4,637	560,937	7.2

Mr Dickson did not receive any salary or fees during the periods shown. Coolform Investments Pty Ltd, a company in which he is a Director and shareholder, received the fees shown for the provision of accounting and company secretarial services.

DIRECTORS REPORT

Compensation options: Granted and vested during the year

During the year 7,500,000 options were issued to directors (2012: Nil). No options vested during the year and 2,500,000 options held by Mr Mulholland and 1,250,000 options held by Mr Dickson expired on 26 November 2012.

	GRANTED	GRANTED				TERMS AND CONDITIONS	TERMS AND CONDITIONS	FOR EACH	GRANT	VESTED
					Fair	Exercise		First	Last
	Number		Date		value	Price	Expiry date	exercise	exercise	Number	%
					$	$		date	date
Directors
J Gresham	-			-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
I Mulholland	5,000,000	3	Dec	12	0.009	0.025	30/11/15	1/12/13	30/11/15	-	-
I Mulholland*	2,500,000	26	Nov	09	0.009	0.038	26/09/12	26/09/11	26/09/12	-	-
B Dickson	2,500,000	3	Dec	12	0.009	0.025	30/11/15	1/12/13	30/11/15	-	-
B Dickson*	1,250,000	26	Nov	09	0.009	0.038	26/09/12	26/09/11	26/09/12	-	-
Total	11,250,000									-	-

*These options expired during the current financial year.

Value of Options granted as part of Remuneration

There were no options granted as remuneration during the 2012 period. During the 2013 financial year 7,500,000 options were issued to directors. For details of options granted and exercised during the 2012 and 2013 years refer to Note 18 of the Financial Statements.

There were no alterations to the terms and conditions of options granted as remuneration since their grant date.

The Company’s remuneration policy prohibits directors and executives from entering into transactions or arrangements which limit the economic risk of participating in unvested entitlements. To ensure compliance with this policy Directors and executives are required to disclose all dealings in company securities, whether vested or not.

Company’s Performance

Company’s share price performance

The Company’s share price performance shown in the below graph is a reflection of the Company’s performance during the year.

The variable components of the executives’ remuneration including short-term and long-term incentives are indirectly linked to the Company’s share price performance.

DIRECTORS REPORT

The graph below shows the Company’s share price performance during the financial year ended 30 June 2013.

==> picture [469 x 328] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Company's Share Price Performance
$0.12
$0.10
$0.08
$0.06
$0.04
$0.02
$0.00
Share Price $
01-Jul-12 01-Aug-12 01-Sep-12 01-Oct-12 01-Nov-12 01-Dec-12 01-Jan-13 01-Feb-13 01-Mar-13 01-Apr-13 01-May-13 01-Jun-13
----- End of picture text -----

Loss per share

Below is information on the Company’s loss per share for the previous four financial years and for the current year ended 30 June 2013.

2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 Basic loss per share (cents) (1.1) (0.9) (0.5) (0.6) (2.1)

Signed in accordance with a resolution of the Directors.

==> picture [99 x 54] intentionally omitted <==

J Gresham Chairman Perth, 24 September 2013

AUDITOR’S INDEPENDENCE DECLARATION

==> picture [70 x 81] intentionally omitted <==

Ernst & Young 11 Mounts Bay Road Perth WA 6000 Australia GPO Box M939 Perth WA 6843

Tel: +61 8 9429 2222 Fax: +61 8 9429 2436 ey.com/au

Auditor’s Independence Declaration to the Directors of Rox Resources Limited

In relation to our audit of the financial report of Rox Resources Limited for the financial year ended 30 June 2013, to the best of my knowledge and belief, there have been no contraventions of the auditor independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 or any applicable code of professional conduct.

==> picture [60 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

Ernst & Young

==> picture [60 x 58] intentionally omitted <==

R J Curtin Partner 24 September 2013

A member of Ernst & Young Global Limited Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Approach to Corporate Governance

Rox Resources Limited ( Company ) has established a corporate governance framework, the key features of which are set out in this statement. In establishing its corporate governance framework, the Company has referred to ASX Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations 2[nd] edition ( Principles & Recommendations ) The Company has followed each recommendation where the Board has considered the recommendation to be an appropriate benchmark for its corporate governance practices. Where the Company's corporate governance practices follow a recommendation, the Board has made appropriate statements reporting on the adoption of the recommendation. In compliance with the "if not, why not" reporting regime, where, after due consideration, the Company's corporate governance practices do not follow a recommendation, the Board has explained it reasons for not following the recommendation and disclosed what, if any, alternative practices the Company has adopted instead of those in the recommendation.

The following governance-related documents can be found on the Company's website at http://roxresources.com.au/corporate-governance/, under the section marked "Corporate Governance":

Charters

Board Audit Committee Nomination Committee Remuneration Committee

Policies and Procedures

Policy and Procedure for Selection and (Re) Appointment of Directors Process for Performance Evaluations Policy on Assessing the Independence of Directors Diversity Policy (summary) Code of Conduct (summary) Policy on Continuous Disclosure (summary) Compliance Procedures (summary) Procedure for the Selection, Appointment and Rotation of External Auditor Shareholder Communication Policy Risk Management Policy (summary) Policy for Trading in Company Securities Whistleblower Policy (summary)

The Company reports below on whether it has followed each of the recommendations during the 2012/2013 financial year ( Reporting Period ). The information in this statement is current at 26 September 2013.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Board

Roles and responsibilities of the Board and Senior Executives

(Recommendations: 1.1, 1.3)

The Company has established the functions reserved to the Board, and those delegated to senior executives and has set out these functions in its Board Charter, which is disclosed on the Company’s website.

The Board is collectively responsible for promoting the success of the Company through its key functions of overseeing the management of the Company, providing overall corporate governance of the Company, monitoring the financial performance of the Company, engaging appropriate management commensurate with the Company's structure and objectives, involvement in the development of corporate strategy and performance objectives, and reviewing, ratifying and monitoring systems of risk management and internal control, codes of conduct and legal compliance.

Senior executives are responsible for supporting the Managing Director and assisting the Managing Director in implementing the running of the general operations and financial business of the Company in accordance with the delegated authority of the Board. Senior executives are responsible for reporting all matters which fall within the Company's materiality thresholds at first instance to the Managing Director or, if the matter concerns the Managing Director, directly to the Chair or the lead independent director, as appropriate.

Skills, experience, expertise and period of office of each Director

(Recommendation: 2.6)

A profile of each Director setting out their skills, experience, expertise and period of office is set out in the Directors' Report on page 16.

The mix of skills and diversity for which the Board is looking to achieve in membership of the Board is represented by the Board’s current composition. While the Company is at exploration stage, it does not wish to increase the size of the Board, and considers that the Board, which includes directors with geological qualifications, exploration and mining industry experience and accounting and finance qualifications, is an appropriate mix of skills and expertise relevant to the Company.

Director independence

(Recommendations: 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.6)

The Board does not have a majority of directors who are independent. The Board considers that the current composition of the Board is adequate for the Company’s current size and operations, and includes an appropriate mix of skills and expertise relevant to the Company’s business. As noted above, while the Company is at exploration stage, it does not wish to increase the size of the Board.

The Board considers the independence of directors having regard to the relationships listed in Box 2.1 of the Principles & Recommendations and the Company's materiality thresholds. The Board has agreed on the following guidelines, as set out in the Company's Board Charter for assessing the materiality of matters:

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Balance sheet items are material if they have a value of more than 10% of pro-forma net asset.
Profit and loss items are material if they will have an impact on the current year operating result of 10% or more.
Items are also material if they impact on the reputation of the Company, involve a breach of legislation, are outside the ordinary course of business, could affect the Company’s rights to its assets, if accumulated would trigger the quantitative tests, involve a contingent liability that would have a probable effect of 10% or more on balance sheet or profit and loss items, or will have an effect on operations which is likely to result in an increase or decrease in net income or dividend distribution of more than 10%.
Contracts will be considered material if they are outside the ordinary course of business, contain exceptionally onerous provisions in the opinion of the Board, impact on income or distribution in excess of the quantitative tests, there is a likelihood that either party will default, and the default may trigger any of the quantitative or qualitative tests, are essential to the activities of the Company and cannot be replaced, or cannot be replaced without an increase in cost which triggers any of the quantitative tests, contain or trigger change of control provisions, are between or for the benefit of related parties, or otherwise trigger the quantitative tests.

The sole independent director of the Company is Jeff Gresham, the Chairman of the Board. Mr Gresham is independent as he is a non-executive director who is not a member of management and who is free of any business or other relationship that could materially interfere with, or could reasonably be perceived to materially interfere with, the independent exercise of his judgment.

The non-independent directors of the Company are the Company’s executive directors, Ian Mulholland (Managing Director) and Brett Dickson (Finance Director).

Independent professional advice

(Recommendation: 2.6)

To assist directors with independent judgement, it is the Board's policy that if a director considers it necessary to obtain independent professional advice to properly discharge the responsibility of their office as a director then, provided the director first obtains approval from the Chair for incurring such expense, the Company will pay the reasonable expenses associated with obtaining such advice.

Selection and (Re)Appointment of Directors

(Recommendation: 2.6)

In determining candidates for the Board, the Nomination Committee (or equivalent) follows a prescribed process whereby it evaluates the mix of skills, experience, expertise and diversity of the existing Board. In particular, the Nomination Committee (or equivalent) is to identify the particular skills and diversity that will best increase the Board's effectiveness. Consideration is also given to the balance of independent directors. Potential candidates are identified and, if relevant, the Nomination Committee (or equivalent) recommends an appropriate candidate for appointment to the Board. Any appointment made by the Board is subject to ratification by shareholders at the next general meeting.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The Board recognises that Board renewal is critical to performance and the impact of Board tenure on succession planning. An election of directors is held each year. Each director other than the Managing Director, must not hold office (without re-election) past the third annual general meeting of the Company following the director's appointment or three years following that director's last election or appointment (whichever is the longer). However, a director appointed to fill a casual vacancy or as an addition to the Board must not hold office (without re-election) past the next annual general meeting of the Company. At each annual general meeting a minimum of one director or one third of the total number of directors must resign. A director who retires at an annual general meeting is eligible for re-election at that meeting. Re-appointment of directors is not automatic.

The Company’s Policy and Procedure for the Selection and Re (Appointment) of Directors is disclosed on the Company’s website.

Board committees

Nomination Committee

(Recommendations: 2.4, 2.6)

The Board has not established a separate Nomination Committee. The size and composition of the Board does not make the establishment of a separate Nomination Committee practical, and the Board believes that there would be no efficiencies or other benefits gained by establishing a separate Nomination Committee. Accordingly, the Board performs the role of the Nomination Committee. Items that are usually required to be discussed by a Nomination Committee are marked as separate agenda items at Board meetings when required. When the Board convenes as the Nomination Committee it carries out those functions which are delegated to it in the Company’s Nomination Committee Charter. The Board deals with any conflicts of interest that may occur when convening in the capacity of the Nomination Committee by ensuring that the director with conflicting interests is not party to the relevant discussions.

The full Board did not officially convene as a Nomination Committee during the Reporting Period.

The Board has adopted a Nomination Committee Charter which describes the role, composition, functions and responsibilities of the full Board in its capacity as the Nomination Committee. The Company’s Nomination Committee Charter is disclosed on the Company’s website.

Audit Committee

(Recommendations: 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4)

The Board has not established a separate Audit Committee, and therefore it is not structured in accordance with Recommendation 4.2. The composition of the Board does not allow the Board to form an audit committee that complies with the structural requirements of Recommendation 4.2 as the Board comprises a majority of non-independent executive directors and the Chair of the Board is the only independent director on the Board. The Board believes that the composition of the Board is not suitable for the formation of a separate Audit Committee, and that there would be no efficiencies gained by establishing a separate Audit Committee. Accordingly, the Board performs the role of Audit Committee. Items that are usually required to be discussed by an Audit Committee are marked as separate agenda items at Board meetings when required. When the Board convenes as the Audit

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Committee it carries out those functions which are delegated to it in the Company’s Audit Committee Charter. The Board deals with any conflicts of interest that may occur when convening in the capacity of the Audit Committee by ensuring that the director with conflicting interests is not party to the relevant discussions. Mr Gresham (the independent Chair of the Audit Committee) is available to meet separately with the external auditor should this be considered necessary.

The Company has adopted an Audit Committee Charter which describes the role, composition, functions and responsibilities of the Audit Committee.

The full Board met in its capacity as the Audit Committee twice during the Reporting Period. Details of director attendance at meetings of the full Board, in its capacity as the Audit Committee, during the Reporting Period are set out in a table in the Directors’ Report on page 18.

Details of each of the director's qualifications are set out in the Directors' Report on page 16. All Board members have substantial industry knowledge and experience and consider themselves to be financially literate. Further, Brett Dickson is a Certified Practising Accountant with a Bachelor degree in Economics and Finance.

The Company has established a Procedure for the Selection, Appointment and Rotation of its External Auditor. The Board is responsible for the initial appointment of the external auditor and the appointment of a new external auditor when any vacancy arises, as recommended by the Audit Committee (or its equivalent). Candidates for the position of external auditor must demonstrate complete independence from the Company through the engagement period. The Board may otherwise select an external auditor based on criteria relevant to the Company's business and circumstances. The performance of the external auditor is reviewed on an annual basis by the Audit Committee (or its equivalent) and any recommendations are made to the Board.

The Company’s Audit Committee Charter and Procedure for Selection, Appointment and Rotation of External Auditor are disclosed on the Company’s website.

Remuneration Committee

(Recommendations: 8.1, 8.2, 8.3, 8.4)

The Board has not established a separate Remuneration Committee, and therefore it is not structured in accordance with Recommendation 8.2. The composition of the Board does not allow the Board to form a Remuneration Committee that complies with the structural requirements of Recommendation 8.2 as the Board comprises a majority of non-independent executive directors and the Chair of the Board is the only independent director on the Board. The Board believes there would be no efficiencies gained by establishing a separate Remuneration Committee. Accordingly, the Board performs the role of Remuneration Committee. Items that are usually required to be discussed by a Remuneration Committee are marked as separate agenda items at Board meetings when required. When the Board convenes as the Remuneration Committee it carries out those functions which are delegated to it in the Company’s Remuneration Committee Charter. The Board deals with any conflicts of interest that may occur when convening in the capacity of the Remuneration Committee by ensuring that the director with conflicting interests is not party to the relevant discussions.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The full Board met in the capacity of the Remuneration Committee once during the Reporting Period. Details of director attendance at meetings of the full Board, in its capacity as the Remuneration Committee, during the Reporting Period are set out in a table in the Directors’ Report on page 18.

To assist the Board fulfil its function as the Remuneration Committee, the Board has adopted a Remuneration Committee Charter which describes the role, composition, functions and responsibilities of the full Board in its capacity as the Remuneration Committee.

Details of remuneration, including the Company’s policy on remuneration, are contained in the “Remuneration Report” which forms of part of the Directors’ Report and commences on page 20. The Company's policy on remuneration clearly distinguishes the structure of non-executive directors’ remuneration from that of executive directors and senior executives.

The Board seeks to set aggregate remuneration at a level which provides the Company with the ability to attract and retain directors of the highest calibre, whilst incurring a cost which is acceptable to shareholders. The amount of aggregate remuneration sought to be approved by shareholders and the manner in which it is apportioned amongst directors is reviewed annually. The Board considers the fees paid to non-executive directors of comparable companies when undertaking the annual review process. Non-executive directors have long been encouraged by the Board to hold shares in the Company (purchased by the director on market). It is considered good governance for directors to have a stake in the Company whose board he or she sits. From time to time the Company may grant options to non-executive directors. The grant of options is designed to attract and retain suitably qualified non-executive directors.

The Company aims to reward executives with a level and mix of remuneration commensurate with their position and responsibilities within the Company and so as to:

reward executives for company and individual performance against targets set by reference to appropriate benchmarks;
align the interests of executives with those of shareholders;
link reward with the strategic goals; and
ensure total remuneration is competitive by market standards .

In determining the level and make-up of executive remuneration, the Board may engage an external consultant to provide independent advice detailing market levels of remuneration for comparable executive roles.

Remuneration consists of the following key elements:

Fixed Remuneration
Variable Remuneration – Long Term Incentive. Long term incentives are delivered in the form of options.

There are no termination or retirement benefits for non-executive directors (other than for superannuation).

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The Company's Remuneration Committee Charter includes a statement of the Company's policy on prohibiting transactions in associated products which limit the risk of participating in unvested entitlements under any equity based remuneration schemes.

The Company’s Remuneration Committee Charter is disclosed on the Company’s website.

Performance evaluation

Senior executives

(Recommendations: 1.2, 1.3)

The Managing Director is responsible for evaluating the performance of senior executives. The evaluations are performed by conducting interviews with the senior executives as required. During the interview key performance indicators are set and agreed on, which will form the basis for the following years’ review.

The Chair, at least annually, evaluates the performance of the Managing Director by formal interview. In reviewing the performance of the Managing Director, performance against pre-determined budgets and performance criteria set the previous year (if any) is assessed.

During the Reporting Period an evaluation of the Managing Director and other senior executives took place in accordance with the process disclosed above.

Board, its committees and individual directors

(Recommendations: 2.5, 2.6)

The Chair is responsible for evaluation of the Board and, when deemed appropriate, Board committees and individual directors.

The Chair evaluates the Board and, when deemed appropriate, Board committees and individual directors by utilising questionnaires which are completed by each director. The Chair, in consultation with the Company Secretary, then reviews the questionnaires and holds round table discussions with the Board to discuss the questionnaires. The Chair holds discussions with individual directors, if required.

During the Reporting Period an evaluation of the Board and individual directors took place in accordance with the process disclosed above.

The Company’s Process for Performance Evaluation is disclosed on the Company’s website.

Ethical and responsible decision making

Code of Conduct

(Recommendations: 3.1, 3.5)

The Company has established a Code of Conduct as to the practices necessary to maintain confidence in the Company's integrity, the practices necessary to take into account its legal obligations and the reasonable expectations of its stakeholders and the responsibility and accountability of individuals for reporting and investigating reports of unethical practices.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The Company has also established a Whistleblower Policy, the aim of which is to ensure that directors, officers and employees comply with the Company's Code of Conduct. The Whistleblower Policy encourages reporting of violations (or suspected violations) and provides effective protection to those reporting by implementing systems for confidentiality and report handling.

A summary of the Company’s Code of Conduct and Whistleblower Policy are disclosed on the Company’s website.

Diversity

(Recommendations: 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5)

The Company has established a Diversity Policy. However, the Diversity Policy provides that the Board may establish measurable objectives for achieving gender diversity that are appropriate for the Company. If established, the Board will assess annually both the objectives and progress towards achieving them.The Board has not set measurable objectives for achieving gender diversity. Given the Company’s stage of development as an exploration company, and the number of employees, the Board considers that it is not practical to set measurable objectives for achieving gender diversity at this time.

The proportion of women employees in the whole organisation, women in senior executive positions and women on the Board are set out in the following table:

	Proportion of women
Whole organisation	1 out of 4 (25%)
Senior Executive positions	0 out of 2 (0%)
Board	0 out of 3 (0%)

A summary of the Company’s Diversity Policy is disclosed on the Company’s website.

Continuous Disclosure

(Recommendations: 5.1, 5.2)

The Company has established written policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance with ASX Listing Rule disclosure requirements and accountability at a senior executive level for that compliance.

A summary of the Company’s Policy on Continuous Disclosure and Compliance Procedures are disclosed on the Company’s website.

Shareholder Communication

(Recommendations: 6.1, 6.2)

The Company has designed a communications policy for promoting effective communication with shareholders and encouraging shareholder participation at general meetings.

The Company’s Shareholder Communication Policy is disclosed on the Company’s website.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Risk Management

Recommendations: 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4)

The Board has adopted a Risk Management Policy and Risk Management Procedures. Under the Risk Management Policy, the Board oversees the processes by which risks are managed. This includes defining the Company’s risk appetite, monitoring of risk performance and those risks that may have a material impact to the business. Management is responsible for the implementation of the risk management and internal control system to manage the Company’s risk and to report to the Board whether those risks are being effectively managed.

In addition, the following risk management measures have been adopted by the Board to manage the Company's material business risks:

the Board has established authority limits for management, which, if proposed to be exceeded, requires prior Board approval;
the Board has adopted a compliance procedure for the purpose of ensuring compliance with the Company's continuous disclosure obligations; and
the Board has adopted a corporate governance manual which contains other policies to assist the Company to establish and maintain its governance practices.

The Company’s system to manage its material business risks includes the preparation of a risk register by management to identify the Company’s material business risks, analyse those risks, evaluate those risks (including assigning a risk owner to each risk) and treat those risks. Risks and their management are to be monitored and reviewed at least half yearly by senior management. The risk register is to be updated and a report submitted to the Managing Director. The Managing Director is to provide a risk report at least half yearly to the Board and an annual review of the risk profile is to be undertaken to ensure relevancy. Specific areas of risk that were identified in the report included operational activities, asset management (including title to exploration and mining leases) and staff.

The Board has required management to design, implement and maintain risk management and internal control systems to manage the Company's material business risks. The Board also requires management to report to it confirming that those risks are being managed effectively. The Board has received a report from management as to the effectiveness of the Company's management of its material business risks for the Reporting Period.

The Managing Director and the Finance Director have provided a declaration to the Board in accordance with section 295A of the Corporations Act and have assured the Board that such declaration is founded on a sound system of risk management and internal control and that the system is operating effectively in all material respects in relation to financial reporting risks.

A summary of the Company’s Risk Management Policy is disclosed on the Company’s website.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

ASX Corporate Governance Council recommendations checklist

The following table sets out the Company’s position with regard to adoption of the Principles & Recommendations as at the date of this statement:

Recommendation	Recommendation	Comply
Principle 1:	Lay solid foundations for management and oversight

1.1	Companies should establish the functions reserved to the board and those delegated to seniorexecutives and disclose thosefunctions.	
1.2	Companies should disclose the process for evaluating the performance of senior executives.	
1.3	Companies should provide the information indicated in the Guide to reporting on Principle1:	
Principle 2:	Structure the board to add value

2.1	A majorityof the board should be independent directors.	
2.2	The chair should be an independent director.	
2.3	The roles of chair and chief executive officer should not be exercised by the same individual.	
2.4	The board should establish a nomination committee.	
2.5	Companies should disclose the process for evaluating the performance of the board, its committees andindividualdirectors.	
2.6	Companies should provide the information indicated in the Guide to reporting on Principle2:	
Principle 3:	Promote ethical and responsible decision-making

3.1	Companies should establish a code of conduct and disclose the code or a summary of the code as to: the practices necessary to maintain confidence in the company’s integrity; the practices necessary to take into account their legal obligations and the reasonable expectations of their stakeholders; and the responsibility and accountability of individuals for reporting and investigating reports ofunethicalpractices.	
3.2	Companies should establish a policy concerning diversity and disclose the policy or a summary of that policy. The policy should include requirements for the board to establish measurable objectives for achieving gender diversity for the board to assess annually boththe objectives and progressinachieving them.	
3.3	Companies should disclose in each annual report the measurable objectives for achieving gender diversity set by the board in accordance with the diversity policy and progress towards achieving them.	
3.4	Companies should disclose in each annual report the proportion of women employees in the whole organisation, women in senior executive positions and womenonthe board.	
3.5	Companies should provide the information indicated in the Guide to reporting on Principle 3:	
Principle 4:	Safeguard integrity in financial reporting

4.1	The board should establish an audit committee.	
4.2	The audit committee should be structured so that it: consists only of non-executive directors; consists of a majority of independent directors; is chaired by an independent chair,whoisnot chairofthe board; andhas atleast threemembers.	
4.3	The audit committee should have a formal charter.	
4.4	Companies should provide theinformation indicatedinthe Guide toreporting on	

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

	Principle4:
Principle 5: Make timely and balanced disclosure

5.1	Companies should establish written policies designed to ensure compliance with ASX Listing Rule disclosure requirements and to ensure accountability at senior executive level for that compliance and disclose those policies or a summary of those policies.	
5.2	Companies should provide the information indicated in the Guide to reporting on Principle 5:	
Principle 6: Respect the rights of shareholders

6.1	Companies should design a communications policy for promoting effective communication with shareholders and encouraging their participation at general meetings and disclose theirpolicy ora summary ofthe policy.	
6.2	Companies should provide the information indicated in the Guide to reporting on Principle 6:	
Principle 7: Recognise and manage risk

7.1	Companies should establish policies for the oversight and management of material businessrisks and disclose a summary ofthose policies.	
7.2	The board should require management to design and implement the risk management and internal control system to manage the company’s material business risks and report to it on whether those risks are being managed effectively. The board should disclose that management has reported to it as to the effectiveness ofthe company’smanagement of itsmaterialbusinessrisks.	
7.3	The board should disclose whether it has received assurance from the chief executive officer (or equivalent) and the chief financial officer (or equivalent) that the declaration provided in accordance with section 295A of the Corporations Act is founded on a sound system of risk management and internal control and that the system is operating effectively in all material respects in relation to financial reportingrisks..	
7.4	Companies should provide the information indicated in the Guide to reporting on Principle7:	
Principle 8: Remunerate fairly and responsibly

8.1	The board should establisharemunerationcommittee.	
8.2	The remuneration committee should be structured so that it: consists of a majority of independent directors; is chaired by an independent chair; and has at least three members.	
8.3	Companies should clearly distinguish the structure of non-executive directors’ remuneration fromthat ofexecutive directors and seniorexecutives.	
8.4	Companies should provide the information indicated in the Guide to reporting on Principle 8:	

STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION As at 30 June 2013

Notes ASSETS Current Assets Cash and cash equivalents Receivables 10(a) Prepayments Other financial assets 13 Total Current Assets Non-Current Assets Available for sale investments 11 Equipment 12 Capitalised exploration expenditure 14 Total Non-Current Assets TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES Current Liabilities Trade and other payables 15 Provisions 16 Total Current Liabilities TOTAL LIABILITIES NET ASSETS EQUITY Contributed equity 17(i) Reserves 17(ii) Accumulated losses 19 TOTAL EQUITY	2013 ($) 2,963,670 41,008 3,453 18,390 3,026,521 - 86,605 1,027,000 1,113,605 4,140,126 1,200,750 60,668 1,261,418 2,878,708 25,791,480 1,265,141 (24,177,913) 2,878,708	2012 ($) 1,309,547 - 3,925 18,390
		1,331,862
		56,250 74,451 1,027,000
		1,157,701
		2,489,563
		89,394 56,821
		146,215
		146,215
		2,343,348
		19,689,538 1,225,615 (18,571,805)
		2,343,348

The above Statement of Financial Position should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.

STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME For the Year Ended 30 June 2013

Notes Other revenue Corporate expenses Occupancy and related expenses Salaries, wages and superannuation Exploration expenditure expensed Loss on investments Share based payments to employees Depreciation Loss before income tax Income tax benefit/(expense) 6 Loss after income tax Other Comprehensive Income Items that may be re-classified subsequently to profit or Loss: Net fair value (gains) on available-for-sale financial assets Transfer from available-for-sale asset reserve to profit and loss upon derecognition of available-for-sale assets Other comprehensive income net of tax TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME/(EXPENSE) FOR THE YEAR Loss per share for loss for the year attributable to ordinary equity holders: basic loss per share (cents) 7 diluted loss per share (cents)	2013 ($) 69,212 (462,279) (150,392) (446,754) (4,560,459) (5,852) (35,776) (13,808) (5,606,108) - (5,606,108) - 3,750 3,750 (5,602,358) (1.14) (1.14)	2012 ($) 133,509 (358,572) (145,429) (356,590) (2,606,221) - (13,618) (12,294)
		(3,359,215)
		-
		(3,359,215)
		22,500 -
		22,500
		(3,336,715)
		(0.85) (0.85)

The above Statement of Comprehensive Income should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.

STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS For the Year Ended 30 June 2013

Note CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES Interest received Payments to suppliers and employees Expenditure on mineral interests Net cash (used in) operating activities 10(b) CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES Purchase of equipment Payments for exploration projects Proceeds on sale of investments Security deposits Net cash (used in) investing activities CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES Proceeds from issue of ordinary shares Share issue costs Net cash provided by financing activities Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period Cash and cash equivalents at end of period 10(a)	2013 ($) 69,212 (976,568) (3,468,649) (4,376,005) (25,962) (100,000) 54,148 - (71,814) 6,487,100 (385,158) 6,101,942 1,654,123 1,309,547 2,963,670	2012 ($) 133,509 (881,688) (2,206,103)
		(2,954,282)
		(5,073) (420,415) - (18,390)
		(443,878)
		346,578 -
		346,578
		(3,051,582) 4,361,129
		1,309,547

The above Statement of Cash Flows should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.

STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY For the Year Ended 30 June 2013

At 1 July 2012 Loss for period Other comprehensive income Total comprehensive loss for the year Transactions with owners in their capacity as owners Issue of share capital Share issue costs Share-based payments Balance as at 30 June 2013 At 1 July 2011 Loss for period Net fair value gains on available for-sale investments Total comprehensive loss for the year Transactions with owners in their capacity as owners Issue of share capital Share-based payments Balance as at 30 June 2012	Issued Share Capital ($) Share Option Reserve ($) Available for sale Asset Reserve ($) Accumulated (Losses) ($) Total ($) 19,689,538 1,229,365 (3,750) (18,571,805) 2,343,348 - - - (5,606,108) (5,606,108) - - 3,750 - 3,750
	- - 3,750 (5,606,108) (5,602,358) 6,487,100 - - - 6,487,100 (385,158) - - - (385,158) - 35,776 - - 35,776
	25,791,480 1,265,141 - (24,177,913) 2,878,708
	18,702,961 1,215,747 (26,250) (15,212,590) 4,679,868 - - - (3,359,215) (3,359,215) - - 22,500 - 22,500
	- - 22,500 (3,359,215) (3,336,715) 986,577 - - - 986,577 - 13,618 - - 13,618
	19,689,538 1,229,365 (3,750) (18,571,805) 2,343,348

The above Statement of Changes in Equity should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS For the Year Ended 30[th] June 2013

NOTE 1 CORPORATE INFORMATION

The financial report of Rox Resources Limited and its controlled entities (‘the Company’) for the year ended 30 June 2013 was authorised for issue in accordance with a resolution of the Directors on 24 September 2013.

Rox Resources Limited is a company limited by shares incorporated in Australia whose shares are publicly traded on the Australian stock exchange. The Company is a for-profit entity.

The nature of the operations and principal activities of the Company are described in the Directors Report.

NOTE 2 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Preparation

The financial report is a general-purposed financial report, which has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Corporations Act 2001, Australian Accounting Standards and other authoritative pronouncements of the Australian Accounting Standards Board. The financial report has also been prepared on a historical cost basis, except for available for sale investments which are measured at fair value. The financial report is presented in Australian dollars.

As a result of the uncertainties inherent in business and other activities, certain items in a financial report cannot be measured with precision but can only be estimated. The estimation process involves best estimates based on the latest information available.

Going Concern

This report has been prepared on the going concern basis, which contemplates the continuity of normal business activity and the realisation of assets and settlement of liabilities in the normal course of business.

The Company has incurred a net loss after tax for the year ended 30 June 2013 of $5,606,108 (2012: $3,359,215) and experienced net cash outflows from operating activities of $4,376,005 (2012: $2,954,282). At 30 June 2013, the Company had net current assets of $1,765,103 (30 June 2012: net current assets of $1,185,647).

The Directors believe there are sufficient funds to meet the Company’s working capital requirements and as at the date of this report the directors believe they can meet all liabilities as and when they fall due. However the Directors recognise that additional funding either through the issue of further shares, convertible notes or a combination of both may be required for the Company to continue to actively explore its mineral properties. The directors are also aware that that the Company can relinquish certain projects in order to maintain its cash at appropriate levels.

The Directors have reviewed the business outlook and the assets and liabilities of the Company and are of the opinion that the use of the going concern basis of accounting is appropriate.

However, if the Company is unable to achieve the above, there is significant uncertainty whether the Company will be able to continue as a going concern and therefore whether it will be able to pay its debts as and when they fall due and realise its assets and extinguish its liabilities in the normal course of business at the amounts stated in the financial report.

The financial report does not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability or classification of recorded asset amounts, nor the amounts or classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company not be able to continue as a going concern.

(a) Compliance statement

The financial report complies with Australian Accounting Standards and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards board.

(b) New accounting standards and interpretations

The Company has adopted all new and amended Australian Accounting Standards and AASB interpretations from 1 July 2012 mandatory for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 July 2012. The adoption of these new and amended Standards and Interpretations, set out below, did not have any effect on the financial position and performance of the Company.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS For the Year Ended 30[th] June 2013

NOTE 2 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont’d)

(b) New accounting standards and interpretations (cont’d)


Reference & Title	Summary	Application date of standard	Application date for Group
AASB 2011-9 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards – Presentation of Other Comprehensive Income [AASB 1, 5, 7, 101, 112, 120, 121, 132, 133, 134, 1039 & 1049]	This Standard requires entities to group items presented in other comprehensive income on the basis of whether they might be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss and those that will not.	1 July 2012	1July2012

The following standards and interpretations have been issued by the AASB but are not yet effective for the period ended 30 June 2013.


AASB 10 Consolidated Financial Statements	AASB 10 establishes a new control model that applies to all entities. It replaces parts of AASB 127 Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements dealing with the accounting for consolidated financial statements and UIG-112 Consolidation – Special Purpose Entities. The new control model broadens the situations when an entity is considered to be controlled by another entity and includes new guidance for applying the model to specific situations, including when acting as a manager may give control, the impact of potential voting rights and when holding less than a majority voting rights may give control. Consequential amendments were also made to other standards via AASB 2011-7.	1 January 2013	The application of this standard will have no impact on the Company	1 July 2013
AASB 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities	AASB 12 includes all disclosures relating to an entity’s interests in subsidiaries, joint arrangements, associates and structures entities. New disclosures have been introduced about the judgments made by management to determine whether control exists, and to require summarised information about joint arrangements, associates and structured entities and subsidiaries with non-controlling interests.	1 January 2013	The application of this standard will have no impact on the Company	1 July 2013

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS For the Year Ended 30[th] June 2013

NOTE 2 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont’d)

(b) New accounting standards and interpretations (cont’d)


Reference & Title	Summary	Application date of standard	Impact on Group financial report	Application date for Group
AASB 13 Fair Value Measurement	AASB 13 establishes a single source of guidance for determining the fair value of assets and liabilities. AASB 13 does not change when an entity is required to use fair value, but rather, provides guidance on how to determine fair value when fair value is required or permitted. Application of this definition may result in different fair values being determined for the relevant assets. AASB 13 also expands the disclosure requirements for all assets or liabilities carried at fair value. This includes information about the assumptions made and the qualitative impact of those assumptions on the fair value determined. Consequential amendments were also made to other standards via AASB 2011-8.	1 January 2013	The application of this standard will have no impact on the Company	1July2013
AASB 119 Employee Benefits	The main change introduced by this standard is to revise the accounting for defined benefit plans. The amendment removes the options for accounting for the liability, and requires that the liabilities arising from such plans is recognized in full with actuarial gains and losses being recognized in other comprehensive income. It also revised the method of calculating the return on plan assets. The revised standard changes the definition of short-term employee benefits. The distinction between short-term and other long-term employee benefits is now based on whether the benefits are expected to be settled wholly within 12 months after the reporting date. Consequential amendments were also made to other standards via AASB 2011-10.	1 January 2013	The application of this standard will have no impact on the Company	1 July 2013

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS For the Year Ended 30[th] June 2013

NOTE 2 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont’d)

(b) New accounting standards and interpretations (cont’d)


Reference & Title	Summary	Application date of standard	Impact on Group financial report	Application date for Group
AASB 11 Joint Arrangements	AASB 11 replaces AASB 131_Interests in Joint_ Ventures_and UIG-113_Jointly- controlled Entities – Non-monetary Contributions by _Ventures._AASB 11 uses the principle of control in AASB 10 to define joint control, and therefore the determination of whether joint control exists may change. In addition it removes the option to account for jointly controlled entities (JCEs) using proportionate consolidation. Instead, accounting for a joint arrangement is dependent on the nature of the rights and obligations arising from the arrangement. Joint operations that give the venturers a right to the underlying assets and obligations themselves is accounted for by recognising the share of those assets and obligations. Joint ventures that give the venturers a right to the net assets is accounted for using the equity method. Consequential amendments were also made to other standards via AASB 2011-7 and amendments to AASB 128.	1 January 2013	The application of this standard will have no impact on the Company	1July2013
AASB 2012-5 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from Annual Improvement 2099-11 cycle	AASB 2012-5 makes amendments resulting from the 2009-2011 Annual Improvements Cycle. The Standard addresses a range of improvements, including the following: • repeat application of AASB 1 is permitted (AASB 1); and • clarification of the comparative information requirements when an entity provides a third balance sheet (AASB 101 Presentation of Financial Statements).	1 January 2013	The application of this standard will have no impact on the Company	1 July 2013

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS For the Year Ended 30[th] June 2013

NOTE 2 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont’d)

(b) New accounting standards and interpretations (cont’d)


Reference & Title	Summary	Application date of standard	Impact on Group financial report	Application date for Group
AASB 1053 Application of Tiers of Australian Accounting Standards	This Standard establishes a differential financial reporting framework consisting of two Tiers of reporting requirements for preparing general purpose financial statements: (a) Tier 1: Australian Accounting Standards (b) Tier 2: Australian Accounting Standards – Reduced Disclosure Requirements Tier 2 comprises the recognition, measurement and presentation requirements of Tier 1 and substantially reduced disclosures corresponding to those requirements. The following entities apply Tier 1 requirements in preparing general purpose financial statements: (a) For-profit entities in the private sector that have public accountability (as defined in this Standard) (b) The Australian Government and State, Territory and Local Governments The following entities apply either Tier 2 or Tier 1 requirements in preparing general purpose financial statements: (a) For-profit private sector entities that do not have public accountability (b) All not-for-profit private sector entities (c) Public sector entities other than the Australian Government and State, Territory and Local Governments. Consequential amendments to other standards to implement the regime were introduced by AASB 2010-2, 2011-2, 2011-6, 2011-11 and 2012-1.	1 July 2013	The Company has been assessed as a Tier 1 entity for the purposes of this standard	1July2013
Interpretation 21 -Levies	This Interpretation confirms that a liability to pay a levy is only recognised when the activity that triggers the payment occurs. Applying the going concern assumption does not create a constructive obligation	1 January 2014	The application of this standard will have no impact on the Company	1July2014

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS For the Year Ended 30[th] June 2013

NOTE 2 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont’d)

(b) New accounting standards and interpretations (cont’d)


Reference & Title	Summary	Application date of standard	Impact on Group financial report	Application date for Group
Interpretation 20 -Stripping Costs in the Production Phase of a Surface Mine	This interpretation applies to stripping costs incurred during the production phase of a surface mine. Production stripping costs are to be capitalised as part of an asset, if an entity can demonstrate that it is probable future economic benefits will be realised, the costs can be reliably measured and the entity can identify the component of an ore body for which access has been improved. This asset is to be called the "stripping activity asset". The stripping activity asset shall be depreciated or amortised on a systematic basis, over the expected useful life of the identified component of the ore body that becomes more accessible as a result of the stripping activity. The units of production method shall be applied unless another method is more appropriate. Consequential amendments were also made to other standards via AASB 2011-12	1 January 2013	The application of this standard will have no impact on the Company	1July2013
AASB 9 - Financial Instruments	AASB 9 includes requirements for the classification and measurement of financial assets. It was further amended by AASB 2010- 7 to reflect amendments to the accounting for financial liabilities. These requirements improve and simplify the approach for classification and measurement of financial assets compared with the requirements of AASB 139. The main changes are described below. (a) Financial assets that are debt instruments will be classified based on (1) the objective of the entity's business model for managing the financial assets; (2) the characteristics of the contractual cash flows.	1 January 2015	The application of this standard has not yet been assessed	1July2015

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS For the Year Ended 30[th] June 2013

NOTE 2 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont’d)

(b) New accounting standards and interpretations (cont’d)


Reference & Title	Summary	Application date of standard	Impact on Group financial report	Application date for Group
AASB 9 - Financial Instruments (continued)	(b) Allows an irrevocable election on initial recognition to present gains and losses on investments in equity instruments that are not held for trading in other comprehensive income. Dividends in respect of these investments that are a return on investment can be recognised in profit or loss and there is no impairment or recycling on disposal of the instrument. (c) Financial assets can be designated and measured at fair value through profit or loss at initial recognition if doing so eliminates or significantly reduces a measurement or recognition inconsistency that would arise from measuring assets or liabilities, or recognising the gains and losses on them, on different bases. (d) Where the fair value option is used for financial liabilities the change in fair value is to be accounted for as follows: The change attributable to changes in credit risk are presented in other comprehensive income (OCI). The remaining change is presented in profit or loss. If this approach creates or enlarges an accounting mismatch in the profit or loss, the effect of the changes in credit risk are also presented in profit or loss. Further amendments were made by AASB 2012-6 which amends the mandatory effective date to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2015. AASB 2012-6 also modifies the relief from restating prior periods by amending AASB 7 to require additional disclosures on transition to AASB 9 in some circumstances. Consequential amendments were also made to other standards as a result of AASB 9, introduced by AASB 2009-11 and superseded by AASB 2010-7 and 2010-10	1 January 2015	The application of this standard has not yet been assessed	1July2015

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS For the Year Ended 30[th] June 2013

NOTE 2 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont’d)

(c) Summary of significant accounting policies

(i) Basis of consolidation

The financial statements comprise the financial statements of Rox Resources Limited and its subsidiaries as at 30 June each year (the ‘Company’).

Subsidiaries are all those entities (including special purpose entities) over which the Company has the power to govern the financial and operating policies so as to obtain benefits from their activities. The existence and effect of potential voting rights that are currently exercisable or convertible are considered when assessing whether a group controls another entity.

The financial statements of the subsidiaries are prepared for the same reporting period as the Parent Company, using consistent accounting policies.

In preparing consolidated financial statements, all intercompany balances and transactions, income and expenses and profit and losses resulting from intra-group transactions have been eliminated in full.

Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date on which control is obtained by the Company and cease to be consolidated from the date on which control is transferred out of the Company.

Non-controlling interests not held by the Company are allocated their share of net profit after tax in the income statement and are presented within equity in the consolidated balance sheet, separately from parent shareholders’ equity.

(ii) Operating Segment reporting – refer Note 5

An operating segment is a component of an entity that engages in business activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses (including revenues and expenses relating to transactions with other components of the same entity) whose operating results are regularly reviewed by the entity’s chief operating decision maker to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment and assess its performance and for which discrete financial information is available. This includes start-up operations which are yet to earn revenues. Management will also consider other factors when determining operating segments such as the existence of a line manager and the level of segment information presented to the board of directors.

Operating segments have been identified based on the information provided to chief operating decision makers – being the executive management team.

The Company aggregates two or more operating segments when they have similar economic characteristics, and the segments are similar in each of the following respects:

Nature of the products and services
Nature of the production processes
Type or class of customer for the products and services
Methods used to distribute the products or provide the services; and where applicable
Nature of the regulatory environment

Operating segments that meet the quantitative criteria of AASB 8 are reported separately. However, an operating segment that does not meet the quantitative criteria is still reported separately where information about the segment would be useful to the users of the financial statements.

(iii) Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and short-term deposits in the Statement of Financial Position comprise cash at bank and in hand and short-term deposits with an original maturity of three months or less.

For the purposes of the Statement of Cash Flows, cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and cash equivalents as defined above, net of outstanding bank overdrafts.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS For the Year Ended 30[th] June 2013

NOTE 2 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont’d)

(iv) Non-current assets and disposal groups held for sale and discontinued operations

Non-current assets and disposal groups are classified as held for sale and measured at the lower of their carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell if their carrying amount will be recovered principally through a sale transaction. They are not depreciated or amortised. For an asset or disposal group to be classified as held for sale, it must be available for immediate sale in its present condition and its sale must be highly probable.

An impairment loss is recognised for any initial or subsequent write-down of the asset (or disposal group) to fair value less costs to sell. A gain is recognised for any subsequent increases in fair value less costs to sell of an asset (or disposal group), but not in excess of any cumulative impairment loss previously recognised. A gain or loss not previously recognised by the date of the sale of the non-current asset (or disposal group) is recognised at the date of derecognition.

A discontinued operation is a component of the entity that has been disposed of or is classified as held for sale and that represents a separate major line of business or geographical area of operations, is part of a single coordinated plan to dispose of such a line of business or area of operations, or is a subsidiary acquired exclusively with a view to resale. The results of discontinued operations are presented separately on the face of the income statement and the assets and liabilities are presented separately on the face of the Statement of Financial Position.

(v) Deferred exploration and evaluation expenditure

Exploration and evaluation costs are written off in the year they are incurred apart from acquisition costs which are carried forward where right of tenure of the area of interest is current and they are expected to be recouped through sale or successful development and exploitation of the area of interest or, where exploration and evaluation activities in the area of interest have not reached a stage that permits reasonable assessment of the existence of economically recoverable reserves.

Where an area of interest is abandoned or the directors decide that it is not commercial, any accumulated acquisition costs in respect of that area are written off in the financial period the decision is made. Each area of interest is also reviewed at the end of each accounting period and accumulated costs written off to the extent that they will not be recoverable in the future.

Amortisation is not charged on costs carried forward in respect of areas of interest in the development phase until production commences.

(vi) Trade and other payables

Trade payables and other payables are carried at amortised costs and represent liabilities for goods and services provided to the Company prior to the end of the financial year that are unpaid and arise when the Company becomes obliged to make future payments in respect of the purchase of these goods and services.

(vii) Issued capital

Ordinary share capital is recognised at the fair value of the consideration received by the Company.

Any transaction costs arising on the issue of ordinary shares are recognised directly in equity as a reduction, net of tax, of the share proceeds received.

(viii) Income tax

Current tax assets and liabilities for the current and prior periods are measured at the amount expected to be recovered from or paid to the taxation authorities. The tax rates and laws used to compute the amount are those that are enacted or substantially enacted by the balance sheet date.

Deferred income tax is provided on all temporary differences at the balance sheet date between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS For the Year Ended 30[th] June 2013

NOTE 2 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont’d)

Deferred income tax liabilities are recognised for all taxable temporary differences:

except where the deferred income tax liability arises from the initial recognition of goodwill or of an asset or liability in a transaction that is not a business combination and, at the time of the transaction, affects neither the accounting profit nor taxable profit or loss; and
in respect of taxable temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries, associates and interest in joint ventures, except where the timing of the reversal of the temporary differences can be controlled and it is probable that the temporary differences will not reverse in the foreseeable future.

Deferred income tax assets are recognised for all deductible temporary differences, carry-forward of unused tax assets and unused tax losses, to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which the deductible temporary differences, and the carry-forward of unused tax assets and unused tax losses can be utilised:

except where the deferred income tax asset relating to the deductible temporary difference arises from the initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction that is not a business combination and, at the time of the transaction, affects neither the accounting profit nor taxable profit or loss; and
in respect of deductible temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries, associates and interest in joint ventures, deferred tax assets are only recognised to the extent that it is probable that the temporary differences will reverse in the foreseeable future and taxable profit will be available against which the temporary differences can be utilised.

The carrying amount of deferred income tax assets is reviewed at each reporting date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow all or part of the deferred income tax asset to be utilised.

Unrecognised deferred income tax assets are reassessed at each reporting date and are recognised to the extent that it has become probable that future taxable profit will allow the deferred tax asset to be recovered.

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the year when the asset is realised or the liability is settled, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date.

Income taxes relating to items recognised directly in equity are recognised in equity and not in the statement of comprehensive income.

Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are offset only if a legally enforceable right exists to set off current tax assets against current tax liabilities and the preferred tax assets and liabilities relate to the same taxable entity and the same taxation authority.

(ix) Trade and other receivables

Trade receivables generally have 30 day terms and are initially recognised at fair value and transaction costs and carried at amortised cost less an allowance for impairment. An impairment allowance is recognised when collection of the full amount is no longer probable. Bad debts are written off when identified.

(x) Equipment

All classes of equipment are stated at historical cost less accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS For the Year Ended 30[th] June 2013

NOTE 2 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont’d)

(x) Equipment (continued)

Depreciation

Depreciation is provided on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the specific asset as follows:

llows:
	2013	2012
Computers	3 years	3 years
Office Equipment	3-4 years	3-4 years
Field Equipment	10 years	10 years

Impairment

The carrying values of equipment are reviewed for impairment at each balance date, with recoverable amount being estimated when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable.

For an asset that does not generate largely independent cash inflows, the recoverable amount is determined for the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs, unless the asset’s value in use can be estimated to be close to its fair value.

An impairment exists when the carrying values of an asset or cash generating unit exceeds its estimated recoverable amount. The asset or cash-generating unit is then written down to its recoverable amount.

The recoverable amount of equipment is the greater of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pretax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset.

Derecognition

An item of property, plant and equipment is derecognised upon disposal or when no future economic benefits are expected to arise from the continued use of the asset.

Any gain or loss arising on derecognition of the asset (calculated as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the item) is included in the Statement of Comprehensive Income in the period the item is derecognised.

(xi) Employee benefits

Provision is made for the employee benefits accumulated as a result of employees rendering services up to the reporting date. These benefits include wages and salaries, annual leave, sick leave and long service leave.

Liabilities arising in respect of wages and salaries, annual leave and other employee benefits expected to be settled within 12 months of the reporting date are measured at the nominal amounts based on remuneration rates which are expected to be paid when the liability is settled. All other employee benefit liabilities are measured at the present value of the estimated future cash outflow to be made in respect of services provided by employees up to the reporting date. In determining the present value of future cash outflows, the market yield as at the reporting date on national government bonds, which have terms to maturity approximating the terms of the related liability, are used.

(xii) Revenue recognition

Revenue is recognised to the extent that it is probable that the economic benefits will flow to the entity and the revenue can be reliably measured. The following specific recognition criteria must also be met before revenue is recognised:

Interest

Revenue is recognised as the interest accrues (using the effective interest method, which is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash receipts through the expected life of the financial instrument) to the net carrying amount of the financial asset.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS For the Year Ended 30[th] June 2013

NOTE 2 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont’d)

(xiii) Leases

Leases are classified at the inception as either operating or finance leases, based on the economic substance of the agreement so as to reflect the risks and benefits incidental to ownership.

Operating leases

The minimum lease payments of operating leases, where the lessor effectively retains substantially all of the risks and benefits of ownership of the leased item, are recognised as an expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

Contingent rentals are recognised as an expense in the financial year in which they are incurred.

(xiv) Impairment of non-financial assets

At each reporting date, the Company assesses whether there is any indication that an asset may be impaired. Where an indicator of impairment exists, the Company makes a formal estimate of recoverable amount. Where the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its recoverable amount the asset is considered impaired and is written down to its recoverable amount.

Recoverable amount is the greater of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. It is determined for an individual asset, unless the asset’s value in use cannot be estimated to be close to its fair value less costs to sell and it does not generate cash inflows that are largely independent of those from other assets or groups of assets, in which case, the recoverable amount is determined for the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs.

In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risk specific to the asset.

Impairment losses relating to continuing operations are recognised in those expense categories consistent with the function of the impaired asset.

An assessment is also made at each reporting date as to whether there is any indication that previously recognised impairment losses may no longer exist or may have decreased. If such indication exists, the recoverable amount is estimated. A previously recognised impairment loss is reversed only if there has been a change in the estimates used to determine the asset’s recoverable amount since the last impairment loss was recognised. If that is the case the carrying amount of the asset is increased to its recoverable amount. That increased amount cannot exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of depreciation, had no impairment loss been recognised for the asset in prior years. Such reversal is recognised in profit or loss unless the asset is carried at revalued amount, in which case the reversal is treated as a revaluation increase. After such a reversal the depreciation charge is adjusted in future periods to allocate the asset’s revised carrying amount, less any residual value, on a systematic basis over its remaining useful life.

(xv) Goods and service tax (GST)

Revenues, expenses and assets are recognised net of the amount of GST except:

where the GST incurred on a purchase of goods and services is not recoverable from the taxation authority, in which case the GST is recognised as part of the cost of acquisition of the asset or as part of the expense item as applicable; and
receivables and payables are stated with the amount of GST included.

The net amount of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority is included as part of receivables or payables in the Statement of Financial Position.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS For the Year Ended 30[th] June 2013

NOTE 2 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont’d)

Cash flows are included in the Statement of Cash Flows on a gross basis and the GST component of cash flows arising from investing and financing activities, which is recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority are classified as operating cash flows.

Commitments and contingencies are disclosed net of the amount of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority.

(xvi) Earnings/loss per share

Basic earnings/loss per share is calculated by dividing the profit/loss from ordinary activities after related income tax expense by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the financial year.

Diluted earnings/loss per share is calculated as net profit/loss attributable to members, adjusted for:

costs of servicing equity (other than dividends);
the after tax effect of dividends and interest associated with dilutive potential ordinary shares that have been recognised as expenses; and
other discretionary changes in revenues or expenses during the period that would result from the dilution of potential ordinary shares;
divided by the weighted average of ordinary shares and dilutive potential ordinary shares adjusted for any bonus element.

(xvii) Share based payment transactions

The Company provides benefits to employees (including Directors) of the Company in the form of sharebased payment transactions, whereby employees render services in exchange for shares or rights over shares (‘equity-settled transactions’).

The cost of these equity-settled transactions with employees is measured by reference to the fair value at the date at which they are granted.

In valuing equity-settled transactions, no account is taken of any performance conditions, other than conditions linked to the price of the shares of Rox Resources Limited (‘market conditions’).

The cost of equity-settled transactions is recognised, together with a corresponding increase in equity, over the period in which the performance conditions are fulfilled, ending on the date on which the relevant employees become fully entitled to the award (‘vesting date’).

The cumulative expense recognised for equity-settled transactions at each reporting date until vesting date reflects (i) the extent to which the vesting period has expired and (ii) the number of awards that, in the opinion of the Directors of the Company, will ultimately vest. This opinion is formed based on the best available information at balance date. No adjustment is made for the likelihood of market performance conditions being met as the effect of these conditions is included in the determination of fair value at grant date.

No expense is recognised for awards that do not ultimately vest, except for awards where vesting is conditional upon non vesting and market conditions.

Where the terms of an equity-settled award are modified, as a minimum an expense is recognised as if the terms had not been modified. In addition, an expense is recognised for any increase in the value of the transactions a result of the modification, as measured at the date of modification.

Where an equity-settled award is cancelled, it is treated as if it had vested on the date of cancellation, and any expense not yet recognised for the award is recognised immediately. However, if a new award is substituted for the cancelled award, and designated as a replacement award on the date that it is granted, the cancelled and new award are treated as if they were modification of the original award, as described in the previous paragraph.

The dilutive effect, if any, of outstanding options is reflected as additional share dilution in the computation of earnings per share.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS For the Year Ended 30[th] June 2013

NOTE 2 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont’d)

(xviii) Foreign currency

The functional currency of the Company is measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which it operates, being Australia. The financial statements are presented in Australian dollars.

Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the date of the transaction. Foreign currency monetary items are translated at the year end exchange rate.

(xix) Available-for-sale investments

Available-for-sale investments are those non-derivative financial assets that are designated as availablefor-sale. After initial recognition available-for-sale investments are measured at fair value with gains or losses being recognised as a separate component of equity until the investment is derecognised or until the investment is determined to be impaired, at which time the cumulative gain or loss previously reported in equity is recognised in profit or loss.

The fair value of investments that are actively traded in organised financial markets are determined by reference to quoted market bid prices at the close of business on the balance sheet date. For investments with no active market, fair values are determined using valuation techniques. Such techniques include: using recent arm’s length market transactions; reference to the current market value of another instrument that is substantially the same; discounted cash flow analysis and option pricing models making as much use of available and supportable market data as possible and keeping judgemental inputs to a minimum.

Impairment

If there is objective evidence that an available-for-sale investment is impaired, an amount comprising the difference between its cost and its current value, less any impairment loss previously recognised in profit or loss, is transferred from equity to the profit or loss. Reversals of impairment losses for equity instruments classified as available-for-sale are not recognised in profit. Reversals of impairment losses for debt instruments are reversed through profit or loss if the increase in an instrument’s fair value can be objectively related to an event occurring after the impairment loss was recognised in profit or loss.

NOTE 3 FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT AND POLICIES

Overview

The Company Entity has exposure to the following risks from its use of financial instruments:

credit risk
liquidity risk
market risk
price risk

This note presents information about the Company’s exposure to each of the above risks, its objectives, policies and processes for measuring and managing risk, and the management of capital.

The Board of Directors has overall responsibility for the establishment and oversight of the risk management framework. Management monitors and manages the financial risks relating to the operations of the Company through regular reviews of the risks.

Credit risk

Credit risk is the risk of financial loss to the Company if a customer or counterparty to a financial instrument fails to meet its contractual obligations, and arises principally from the Company’s investment securities. For the Company it arises from receivables due from subsidiaries, if any.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS For the Year Ended 30[th] June 2013

NOTE 3 FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT AND POLICIES (cont’d)

Cash and cash equivalents

The Company’s cash and cash equivalents are maintained in banks with srong credit ratings at year-end .

Trade and other receivables

As the Company operates in the mining exploration sector its receivables generally relate to GST receivable from the Australian taxation authority and as it is a statutory body has a very low credit risk.

Presently, the Company undertakes exploration and evaluation activities in Australia. At the balance sheet date there were no significant concentrations of credit risk.

Other financial assets

At financial year end, there is a risk from the Northern Territory Department of Resources not refunding the security deposit.

Exposure to credit risk

The carrying amount of the Company’s financial assets represents the maximum credit exposure. The Company’s maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting date was:

ny’s maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting date was:
Note Cash and cash equivalents 10 Receivables Other financial assets 13 Available for sale investments 11 Total	Carrying amount 2013 2012 2,963,670 1,309,547 41,008 - 18,390 18,390 - 56,250
	3,023,068 1,384,187

None of the Company’s trade and other receivables are past due (2012: nil). At 30 June 2013 the Company does not have any collective impairments on its other receivables (2012: nil).

Guarantees

Company policy is to provide financial guarantees only to wholly-owned subsidiaries. At the date of this report there are no outstanding guarantees. There were no financial guarantees at the end of the prior financial year.

Liquidity risk

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due. The Company’s approach to managing liquidity is to ensure, as far as possible, that it will always have sufficient liquidity to meet its liabilities when due, under both normal and stressed conditions, without incurring unacceptable losses or risking damage to the Company’s reputation.

The Company manages liquidity risk by maintaining adequate reserves by continuously monitoring forecast and actual cash flows.

The following are the contractual maturities of financial liabilities, including estimated interest payments and excluding the impact of netting agreements:

	Carrying	6 months
	amount	or less
30 June 2013
Trade and other payables	1,200,750	1,200,750
30 June 2012
Trade and other payables	89,394	89,394

There are no outstanding guarantees at year-end.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS For the Year Ended 30[th] June 2013

NOTE 3 FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT AND POLICIES (cont’d)

Market Risk

Market risk is the risk that changes in market prices, such as foreign exchange rates, interest rates and equity prices will affect the Company’s income or the value of its holdings of financial instruments. The objective of market risk management is to manage and control market risk exposures within acceptable parameters, while optimising the return.

Currency risk

The Company is exposed to currency risk on investments and purchases that are denominated in a currency other than the respective functional currencies of Company entities, primarily the Australian dollar (AUD). The currency in which these transactions primarily are denominated are AUD.

The Company has not entered into any derivative financial instruments to hedge such transactions and anticipated future receipts or payments that are denominated in a foreign currency.

The Company considers that its exposure to currency risk is minimal and has not developed any policies or procedures to manage such risk.

Exposure to currency risk

The Company’s exposure to foreign currency risk at balance date was Nil (2012: Nil).

Price Risk

Equity securities price risk arises from investments in equity securities. The Company does not actively invest in equity securities and its exposure to price risk is minimal, though from time to time it will acquire holdings in equity securities as a result of dealings in its exploration interests. The Company reviews its portfolio at least each quarter. The equity investments held by the Company are publicly traded on the ASX (Australian Securities Exchange) and as such there is a ready market for the investments at most times.

The financial instruments exposed to movements in equity prices are as follows:

				Carrying amount	Carrying amount
			Note	2013	2012
Available for sale	investments		11	-	56,250
*Sensitivity analysis*
		Effect	on:		Effect	on:
		Other		Other
		Comprehensive	Comprehensive		Equity	Equity
		Income	Income
Risk Variable	Sensitivity	2013		2012	2013	2012
Share Price Sensitivity	+5%	-	2,812		-	2,812
Share Price Sensitivity	-5%	-	(2,812)		-	(2,812)

Interest rate risk

The Company is exposed to interest rate risk. The Company considers that its exposure to interest risk is minimal, however it has a policy of monitoring interest rates offered by competing financial institutions to ensure it is aware of market trends and it receives competitive interest rates.

Profile

At the reporting date the interest rate profile of the Company’s interest-bearing financial instruments was:

	Carrying	amount
	2013	2012
Variable rate instruments
Cash and cash equivalents	2,963,670	1,309,547
Fair value sensitivity analysis for fixed rate instruments

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS For the Year Ended 30[th] June 2013

NOTE 3 FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT AND POLICIES (cont’d)

The Company does not account for any fixed rate financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss, and the Company does not carry any derivative or hedging instruments. Therefore a change in interest rates at the reporting date would not affect profit or loss.

The Company holds financial assets subject to variable interest rates and fluctuating interest rates would affect the Company’s profit and equity. A change of 1% (2012: 1%) in variable interest rates would have increased or decreased the Company’s equity and profit by $29,637 (2012: $13,095), and would have had the same effect on cash flow. The difference between 2013 and 2012 reflects the difference in value of financial assets subject to variable interest rates. The difference in interest rates during this and the previous financial period have had no material impact on the results of the Company Entity. The 1% sensitivity is based on reasonable possible movements over a financial year, after observation of a range of actual historical rate movement over the past five years.

Capital Management

When managing capital, managements objective is to ensure the Company continues as a going concern as well as to maintain optimal returns to shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders. Management also aims to maintain a capital structure that ensures the lowest cost of capital available to the Company.

The Company will raise equity through the issue of shares from time to time as the board sees fit to ensure it meets its objective of continuing as a going concern. The Company does not have any borrowings and has no current plans to obtain any debt facilities, as a result the Company’s total capital is defined as shareholders’ equity, and at 30 June stood at:

	2013	2012
Equity	2,878,708	2,343,348

The Company is not subject to any externally imposed capital requirements.

Fair Values

Other than for available for sale investments the net fair value of assets and liabilities approximates their carrying value because of their short term to maturity.

The Company uses various methods in estimating the fair value of a financial instrument. The methods comprise:

Level 1 – the fair value is calculated using quoted prices in active markets. Level 2 – the fair value is estimated using inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (as prices) or indirectly (derived from prices). Level 3 – the fair value is estimated using inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data.

The fair value of the financial instruments as well as the methods used to estimate the fair values are summarised in the table below:

		30 June 2013	30 June 2013			30 June 2012	30 June 2012
	Quoted Market Price (Level 1)	Valuation Technique – Market Observable Inputs (Level 2)	Valuation Technique – Non-Market Observable Inputs (Level 3)	Total	Quoted Market Price (Level 1)	Valuation Technique – Market Observable Inputs (Level 2)	Valuation Technique – Non-Market Observable Inputs (Level 3)	Total
Available for Sale Investments	-	-	-		56,250	-	-	56,250

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS For the Year Ended 30[th] June 2013

NOTE 4 SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING JUDGEMENTS, ESTMATES AND ASSUMPTIONS

The preparation of the financial statements requires management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts in the financial statements. Management continually evaluates its judgements and estimates in relation to assets, liabilities, contingent liabilities, revenue and expenses. Management bases its judgements and estimates on historical experience and on various factors it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the result of which form the basis of the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.

Management has identified the following critical accounting policies for which significant judgements, estimates and assumptions are made. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions and may materially affect financial results or the financial position reported in future periods.

Further details of the nature of these assumptions and conditions may be found in the relevant notes to the financial statements.

Exploration and Evaluation

The Company’s accounting policy for exploration and evaluation is set out in note 2 to the accounts. The application of this policy necessarily requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions as to future events and circumstances, in particular, the assessment of whether economic quantities of reserves have been found. Any such estimates and assumptions may change as new information becomes available. If, after having capitalised expenditure under our policy, we conclude that we are unlikely to recover the expenditure by future exploitation or sale, then the relevant capitalised amount will be written off to the Statement of Comprehensive Income.

Share options

The Company measures the cost of equity-settled transactions with employees by reference to the fair value of the equity instruments at the date at which they are granted. The fair value is determined using the binominal formula. For options issued in this financial year, the assumptions detailed as per Note 18 were used.

NOTE 5 SEGMENT INFORMATION

Identification of Reportable Segments

The Company operates within the mineral exploration industry within Australia.

The Company determines its operating segments by reference to internal reports that are reviewed and used by the Board of Directors (the chief operating decision maker) in assessing performance and in determining the allocation of resources. The Board of Directors currently receive Statement of Financial Position and Statement of Comprehensive Income information that is prepared in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards therefore there is no additional information to disclose.

The Statement of Financial Position and Statement of Comprehensive Income information received by the Board of Directors does not include any information by segment. The executive team manages each exploration activity of each exploration concession through review and approval of statutory expenditure requirements and other operational information.

Based on this criterion, the Company has only one operating segment, being exploration, and the segment operations and results are the same as the Company results.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS For the Year Ended 30[th] June 2013

NOTE 6 INCOME TAX INCOME

2013 ($) 2012 ($) The major components of income tax expenses are: Income Statement Current Income Tax Current income tax charge/(benefit) - - Deferred Income Tax Relating to origination and reversal of temporary differences - - Income tax expense/(benefit) reported in the statement of comprehensive income - - Accounting loss before tax from continuing operations (5,606,107) (3,359,215) At the Company’s statutory income tax rate of 30% (1,681,832) (1,007,765) Other 123 274 Share based payments 10,733 4,085 Share registry costs (37,585) 34,678 Prior year adjustment to deferred tax balances (8,702) 53,753 Deferred tax assets not brought to account (gross) 1,699,859 984,331 Income tax expense/(benefit) reported in the statement of Comprehensive Income - - STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME 2013 $ 2012 $ 2013 $ 2012 $ Deferred Income Tax Deferred income tax at 30 June relates to the following Deferred tax liabilities Prepayments (1,178) (27) (1,151) (21) Plant & equipment (13,296) (20,758) 7,462 (18,916) Deferred tax assets Accruals 10,200 9,900 300 - Provision for employee entitlements 18,200 17,046 1,154 3,885 Revenue tax losses 5,327,143 3,633,064 1,692,094 999,383 Deferred tax assets not brought to account as realisation is not probable (5,341,039) (3,641,209) - - Deferred tax assets not recognised (1,699,859) (984,331) Deferred tax (income)/expense - -	2012 ($) - -	2012 ($) - -
	-
	(3,359,215)
	(1,007,765) 274 4,085 34,678 53,753 984,331
	-
		(21) (18,916) - 3,885 999,383 (984,331)
-		-

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS For the Year Ended 30[th] June 2013

NOTE 6 INCOME TAX (cont’d)

Potential future income tax benefits attributable to gross tax losses of $18,594,053 (2012: $11,678,784) carried forward have not been brought to account at 30 June 2013 because Directors do not believe it is appropriate to regard realisation of the future tax benefit as probable. These benefits will only be obtained if:

(i) the Company derives future assessable income of a nature and of an amount sufficient to enable the benefit from the losses and deductions to be released;
(ii) the Company continues to comply with the conditions for deductibility imposed by the law; and
(iii) no changes in tax legislation adversely affect the Company in realising the benefit from the deductions for the losses

Tax losses carried forward have no expiry date. Tax consolidation for the Group has not been adopted.

NOTE 7 LOSS PER SHARE The following reflects the income and share data used in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share Net loss Weighted average number of ordinary shares used in calculating basic earnings per share Effect of dilutive securities: - Share options (i) Adjusted weighted average number of ordinary shares used in calculating diluted earnings per share	2013 $ (5,606,108) 490,855,300 - 490,855,300	2012 $ (3,359,215)
		394,395,927
		-
		394,395,927

(i) Share options are not dilutive as their exercise would have the impact of decreasing loss per share.

There were a total of 9,050,000 share options that were potentially dilutive to shares on issue at 30 June 2013 (2012: 4,300,000).

The above weighted average number of shares incorporates an adjustment to the calculation to incorporate the effects of bonus elements in relation to rights issues in the current and previous financial year.

Conversion, calls, subscriptions or issues after 30 June 2013

There have been no conversions to, calls of, or subscriptions for ordinary shares since the reporting date and before the completion of this financial report.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS For the Year Ended 30[th] June 2013

NOTE 8 DIRECTOR AND EXECUTIVE DISCLOSURES

(a) Details of Key Management Personnel

Jeffrey Gresham Non-executive Chairman ( appointed 1 October 2006) Ian Mulholland Managing Director ( appointed 27 November 2003) Brett Dickson Executive Director (appointed 31 March 2010) Company Secretary ( appointed 27 November 2003)

(b) Compensation of Key Management Personnel by Category

Short Term Post Employment Share-Based Payments	2013 ($) 542,437 31,300 28,155 601,892	2012 ($) 470,000 86,300 4,637
		560,937

(c) Share holdings of Key Management Personnel

2013	Balance at 1 July 2012	Granted as Remuneration	Purchased	Net Change/ Other		Balance at 30 June 2013
I Mulholland	10,080,708	-	1,000,000		-	11,080,708
J Gresham	1,059,501	-	1,000,000		-	2,059,501
B Dickson	4,250,000	-	1,000,000		-	5,250,000
	15,390,209	-	3,000,000		-	18,390,209
2012	Balance at 1 July 2011	Granted as Remuneration	Purchased	Net Change/ Other		Balance at 30 June 2012
I Mulholland	10,080,708	-	-		-	10,080,708
J Gresham	1,023,334	-	36,167		-	1,059,501
B Dickson	1,250,000	-	3,000,000		-	4,250,000
	12,354,042	-	3,036,167		-	15,390,209

(d) Options holdings of Key Management Personnel

2013 J Gresham I Mulholland B Dickson	Balance at 1 July 2012 Granted as Remuneration Options Exercised Options Lapsed Balance at 30 June 2013 - - - - - 2,500,000 5,000,000 - (2,500,000) 5,000,000 1,250,000 2,500,000 - (1,250,000) 2,500,000
	3,750,000 7,500,000 - (3,750,000) 7,500,000

At 30 June 2013 no options held by directors have vested. One half of the options held vest after 30 November 2013 and the balance after 30 November 2014.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS For the Year Ended 30[th] June 2013

NOTE 8 DIRECTOR AND EXECUTIVE DISCLOSURES (cont’d)

2012 J Gresham I Mulholland B Dickson	Balance at 1 July 2011 Granted as Remuneration Options Exercised Options Expired/Sold/ Lapsed Balance at 30 June 2011 36,167 - (36,167) - - 2,500,000 - - - 2,500,000 1,250,000 - - - 1,250,000
	3,786,167 - (36,167) - 3,750,000

At 30 June 2012 all options held by directors were fully vested and could be exercised any time until expiry.

NOTE 9 AUDITOR’S REMUNERATION Notes 2013 ($) Remuneration of the auditor of the Company, Ernst & Young (Australia) for: Auditing and reviewing the financial report 50,440 Taxation services 10,000 60,440 NOTE 10 CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS (a) Cash and cash equivalents 2,963,670 Cash at bank earns interest at floating rates based on daily deposit rates (b) Reconciliation of net loss after income tax to net cash flow from operations: Net loss after Income Tax 5,606,108 Adjustments for non-cash expense items - Depreciation (13,808) - Share based payments (35,776) - Payments for exploration projects (100,000) - Loss on investments (5,852) Changes in assets and liabilities - Increase (decrease) in prepayments (472) - (Increase) decrease in provisions (3,847) - (Increase) decrease in payables (1,111,356) - Increase (decrease) in receivables 41,008 Cash out-flow from operations 4,476,005		2012 ($) 53,251 21,285
		74,536
		1,309,547
		3,359,215 (12,294) (13,618) (420,415) - 807 (12,951) 53,538 -
		2,954,282

(c) During the 2012 year 20,000,000 shares at 3.2 cents each were issued to Avoca Resources Limited as consideration for the purchase of the Mr Fisher project. There were no non-cash financing and investing activities in the 2013 financial year.

(d) The Company does not have any credit standby arrangements, used or unused loan facilities.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS For the Year Ended 30[th] June 2013

==> picture [479 x 67] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

||||
|---|---|---|
|NOTE 11|NON-CURRENT ASSETS - AVAILABLE|
|FOR SALE INVESTMENTS|2013|2012|
|($)|($)|
|At fair value|
|Shares – listed (a)|-|56,250|

----- End of picture text -----

Available for sale investments consists of investments in ordinary shares, and therefore have no fixed maturity date or coupon rate.

(a) Movements in available for sale assets

==> picture [487 x 61] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

||||
|---|---|---|
|Balance at 1 July|56,250|33,750|
|Sales|(56,250)|-|
|Unrealised gain/(loss) on available for sale investments transferred to|
|/(from) equity|-|22,500|
|Balance at 30 June|-|56,250|

----- End of picture text -----

No impairment loss in respect of available for sale investments was recognised during the current year in the profit and loss (2012: Nil) owing to a reduction in the trading value of those securities.

(b) Listed shares

The fair value of listed available for sale investments has been determined directly by reference to published price quotations in an active market.

NOTE 12 EQUIPMENT

==> picture [482 x 107] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

|||||
|---|---|---|---|
|Equipment at cost|175,927|149,965|
|Accumulated depreciation|(89,322)|(75,514)|
|86,605|74,451|
|(a)|Movements in plant and equipment|
|-|At 1 July, net of accumulated depreciation|74,451|81,672|
|-|Additions|25,962|5,073|
|-|Depreciation|13,808|(12,294)|
|At 30 June, net of accumulated depreciation|86,605|74,451|

----- End of picture text -----

NOTE 13 OTHER FINANCIAL ASSETS

Current

Security deposit 18,390 18,390

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS For the Year Ended 30[th] June 2013

	2013	2012
	($)	($)
NOTE 14 EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION
Areas of interest in exploration and evaluation phases:
Balance at beginning of period	1,027,000	387,000
Acquisition	-	640,000
	1,027,000	1,027,000
Ultimate recoupment of exploration and evaluation expenditure carried forward is dependent		on successful
development and commercial exploitation or, alternatively, sale of the respective areas.
NOTE 15 TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES
Trade creditors and accruals (a)	1,200,750	89,394
(a) Terms and Conditions
Creditors, including related parties, are non-interest bearing and generally on 30 day terms.
NOTE 16 PROVISIONS
Employee benefits – annual leave	14,790	15,943
Employee benefits-long service leave	45,878	40,878
	60,668	56,821
NOTE 17 CONTRIBUTED EQUITY AND RESERVES
(i) Contibuted Equity
(a) Issued and paid up capital
Ordinary shares fully paid	25,791,480	19,689,538
(b) Movement in shares on issue
Issued and paid up capital – Ordinary shares fully paid
Ordinary shares at beginning of period – 398,336,377
(2012: 355,231,233)	19,689,538	18,702,961
Issue of 20,000,000 shares at $0.032 per share (net of share issue
costs)	-	640,000
Exercise of 23,105,144 options at $0.015 each	-	346,577
Issue of 92,473,377 shares at $0.015 per share (net of share issue	1,338,642	-
costs)
Issue of 10,000,000 shares at $0.015 per share	150,000	-
Issue of 90,000,000 shares at $0.055 per share (net of share issue	4,613,300	-
costs)
At reporting date: 590,809,744 shares	25,791,480	19,689,538

Effective 1 July 1998, the corporation’s legislation in place abolished the concepts of authorised capital and par value shares. Accordingly the Company does not have authorised capital nor par value in respect of its issued shares.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS For the Year Ended 30[th] June 2013

NOTE 17 CONTRIBUTED EQUITY AND RESERVES (cont’d)

(c) Share Options

During the year 3,750,000 options expired.

During the year 8,500,000 options with an exercise price of $0.025 and an expiry date of 30 November 2015 were issued. No other options were issued during the year and no other options have been exercised up to the date of this financial report.

At the end of the financial year there were 9,050,000 (2012: 4,300,000) unissued ordinary shares in respect of which options were outstanding.

(d) Terms and Conditions of Contributed Equity

Ordinary shares have the right to receive dividends as declared and, in the event of winding up the Company, to participate in the proceeds from the sale of all surplus assets in proportion to the number of and amounts paid up on shares held.

Ordinary shares entitle their holder to one vote, either in person or by proxy, at a meeting on the Company.

(ii) Reserves

Reserves (a) Share Option Reserve Movements Balance at beginning of year Options issued - staff Balance at end of year (b) Available for Sale Reserve Movements Balance at beginning of year Transfer to profit or loss Unrealised gain Balance at end of year	2013 ($) 1,265,141 1,229,365 35,776 1,265,141 (3,750) 3,750 -	2012 ($)
		1,225,615
		1,215,747 13,618
		1,229,365
		(26,250) - 22,500
	-	(3,750)

Nature and Purpose of Reserves

Share Option Reserve

This reserve is used to record the value of equity benefits provided to employees and unrelated parties for services and the acquisition of mineral exploration projects.

Available For Sale reserve

This reserve is used to record the unrealised gains and losses on available for sale investments.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS For the Year Ended 30[th] June 2013

NOTE 18 SHARE BASED PAYMENTS

A. Directors and Employees

(i) Employee Share Incentive Scheme

An Employee Share Scheme (ESS) has been established where Rox Resources Limited may, at the discretion of Directors, grant options over the ordinary shares of Rox Resources Limited to Directors, executives and employees of the Company. The plan is designed to provide long-term incentives for employees and to deliver long term shareholder returns. Participation in the plan is at the Board’s discretion and no individual has a contractual right to participate in the plan or to receive guaranteed benefits. In addition, under the Plan, the Board determines the terms of the options including exercise price, expiry date and vesting conditions, if any.

Options granted under the plan are unlisted and carry no dividend or voting rights. When exercised, each option is convertible into an ordinary share of the Company with full dividend and voting rights.

No options were issued during the year. During 2012 550,000 options with an exercise price of $0.047 and expiry of 30 November 2014 were issued and remain outstanding at year end.

Set out below is a summary of options issued.

Grant Date Expiry Date Exercise Price (cents) Value per option at grant date (cents)	Grant Date Expiry Date Exercise Price (cents) Value per option at grant date (cents)	Balance of the start of the year (number) Granted during the year (number) Exercised during the year (number) Forfeited during the year (number) Balance at end of the year (number) Vested and exercisable at end of the year (number)
2013 21/11/11 30/11/14 4.7 2.3 Weighted average exercise price 2012 21/11/11 30/11/14 4.7 2.3 Weighted average exercise price		550,000 - - - 550,000 550,000
		550,000 - - - 550,000 550,000 $0.047 - 550,000 - - 550,000 275,000
		- 550,000 - - 550,000 275,000 $0.047

The weighted average remaining contractual life of share options outstanding at the end of the year was 1.4 years. (2012: 2.4 years)

Fair value of options granted

No options were granted in the 2013 financial year. For the 2012 year the weighted average fair value of the options granted was 2.34 cents. The value was calculated by using the Binominal Option valuation methodology.

methodology.
	2012
Weighted average exercise price (cents)	4.70
Weighted average life of the option (years)	3.03
Weighted average underlying share price (cents)	3.30
Expected share price volatility	130%
Risk free interest rate	3.23

Historical volatility has been the basis for determining expected share price volatility as it is assumed that this is indicative of future trends, which may not eventuate.

The life of the options is based on historical patterns, which may not eventuate in the future.

No other features of options granted were incorporated into the measurement of fair value.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS For the Year Ended 30[th] June 2013

NOTE 18 SHARE BASED PAYMENTS (cont’d)

(ii) Other Share Options

Options issued to Directors and executives other than through the ESS are set out below.

2013 Grant Date Expiry Date Exercise Price (cents) Value per option at grant date (cents)		Balance of the start of the year (number) Granted during the year (number) Exercised during the year (number) Expired during the year (number) Balance at end of the year (number) Vested and exercisable at end of the year (number)
3/12/12 30/11/15 2.5 0.9 26/11/09 26/11/12 3.8 0.9 Weight average exercise price 2012 Grant Date Expiry Date Exercise Price (cents) Value per option at grant date (cents)		- 8,500,000 - - 8,500,000* - 3,750,000 - - 3,750,000 - -
		3,750,000 8,500,000 - - 8,500,000 - $0.038 $0.025 $0.038 $0.025 $0.025 Balance of the start of the year (number) Granted during the year (number) Exercised during the year (number) Forfeited during the year (number) Balance at end of the year (number) Vested and exercisable at end of the year (number)
26/11/09 26/11/12 3.8 0.9 Weight average exercise price		3,750,000 - - - 3,750,000 3,750,000
		3,750,000 - - - 3,750,000 3,750,000 $0.038 $0.038 $0.038

At 30 June 2013 no options have vested

The weighted average remaining contractual life of share options outstanding at the end of the year was 2.42 years (2012: 0.42 years).

Fair value of options granted

No options were granted in the 2012 financial year. For the 2013 year the weighted average fair value of the options granted was 0.86 cents. The value was calculated by using the Binominal Option valuation methodology.

Fair value of options granted (cont’d)

Fair value of options granted (cont’d)
	2013
Weighted average exercise price (cents)	2.50
Weighted average life of the option (years)	2.99
Weighted average underlying share price (cents)	1.60
Expected share price volatility	100%
Risk free interest rate	2.58

Historical volatility has been the basis for determining expected share price volatility as it assumed that this is indicative of future trends, which may not eventuate.

The life of the options is based on historical exercise patterns, which may not eventuate in the future.

No other features of options granted were incorporated into the measurement of fair value.

B. Unrelated Parties

No options were issued to unrelated parties during the 2013 and 2012 years and no options to unrelated parties are currently on issue.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS For the Year Ended 30[th] June 2013

NOTE 19 ACCUMULATED LOSSES Balance at beginning of year Net loss attributable to members of Rox Resources Limited Balance at end of year	2013 ($) 18,571,805 5,606,108 24,177,913	2012 ($) 15,212,590 3,359,215
		18,571,805

No dividends were paid during or since the financial year. There are no franking credits available (2012: nil).

NOTE 20 EXPENDITURE COMMITMENTS

(a) Exploration Commitments

The Company has entered into certain obligations to perform minimum work on mineral tenements held. The Company is required to meet tenement lease rentals and minimum expenditure requirement which are set out below. These may be varied or deferred on application and are expenditures expected to be met in the normal course of business.

the normal course of business.
	2013 $ 2012 $
Not later than one year Later than one year and not later than five years	842,368 770,613 - -
	842,368 770,613

(b) Remuneration Commitments

Commitments for the payment of salaries and other remuneration under long-term employment contracts in existence at the reporting date but not recognised as liabilities, payable:

Not later than one year Later than one year and not later than five years	444,000 444,000 222,000 666,000
	666,000 1,110,000

NOTE 21 CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

At the financial reporting date there are no contingent liabilities.

NOTE 22 EVENTS SUBSEQUENT TO REPORTING DATE

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS For the Year Ended 30[th] June 2013

NOTE 23 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

(a) Other Director Related Transactions

Coolform Investments Pty Ltd, a company in which Mr Dickson is a Director and shareholder, received fees totalling $161,812 (2012: $155,000) for the provision of services. An amount of Nil (2012: Nil) is payable at year end.

During the year the Company paid fees totalling $98,406 (2012: $98,406) (including GST) to Azure Minerals Limited, a company of which Mr Dickson is an officer, for the provision of office accommodation. The Company also received fees totalling $28,327 (2012: $27,376) (including GST) from Azure Minerals Limited being reimbursement for the provision of office secretarial support.

The above transactions were entered into on normal commercial terms.

(b) Subsidiaries

At Balance date the company does not have any subsidiaries.

		%	Equity	Investment $	Investment $
		Interest
Name	Country of Incorporation	2013	2012	2013	2012
Nyala Resources (Proprietary) Limited	South Africa	-	-	-	-

During the 2012 year Nyala Resources (Proprietary) Limited was deregistered.

(c) Ultimate Parent

Rox Resources Limited is the ultimate Australian parent entity.

DIRECTORS DECLARATION

In accordance with a resolution of the Directors of Rox Resources Limited, I state that:

In the opinion of the Directors:
(a) The financial statements and notes of the Company are in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001 , including:
- (i) giving a true and fair view of the Company’s financial position as at 30 June 2013 and its performance for the year ended on that date; and
(ii) complying with Accounting Standards (including the Australian Accounting Interpretations) and the Corporations Regulations 2001 ; and
(b) the financial statements and notes also comply with International Financial Reporting Standards as disclosed in Note 2(a); and
(c) subject to the achieving of the matters set out in Note 2 there are reasonable grounds to believe that the company will be able to pay its debts as and when they become due and payable.
(d) This declaration is made after receiving the declarations required to be made to the Directors in accordance with section 295A of the Corporations Act 2001 for the financial year ending 30 June 2013.

On behalf of the Board

==> picture [112 x 62] intentionally omitted <==

J Gresham Chairman Perth, 24 September 2013.

INDEPENDENT AUDIT REPORT

==> picture [70 x 81] intentionally omitted <==

Ernst & Young 11 Mounts Bay Road Perth WA 6000 Australia GPO Box M939 Perth WA 6843

Fax: +61 8 9429 2436 ey.com/au

Independent auditor's report to the members of Rox Resources Limited

Report on the financial report

We have audited the accompanying financial report of Rox Resources Limited, which comprises the statement of financial position as at 30 June 2013, the statement of comprehensive income, statement of changes in equity and statement of cash flows for the year then ended, notes comprising a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information, and the directors' declaration.

Directors’ responsibility for the financial report

The directors of the company are responsible for the preparation of the financial report that gives a true and fair view in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Act 2001 and for such internal controls as the directors determine are necessary to enable the preparation of the financial report that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. In Note 2 the directors also state, in accordance with Accounting Standard AASB 101 Presentation of Financial Statements , that the financial statements comply with International Financial Reporting Standards .

Auditor's responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial report based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards. Those standards require that we comply with relevant ethical requirements relating to audit engagements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial report is free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial report. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial report, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal controls relevant to the entity's preparation of the financial report that gives a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity's internal controls. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by the directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial report.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

Independence

In conducting our audit we have complied with the independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 . We have given to the directors of the company a written Auditor’s Independence Declaration, a copy of which is included in the directors’ report.

A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation

INDEPENDENT AUDIT REPORT

==> picture [70 x 81] intentionally omitted <==

Opinion

In our opinion:

a. The financial report of Rox Resources Limited is in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001 , including
i. giving a true and fair view of the company's financial position as at 30 June 2013 and of its performance for the year ended on that date; and
ii. complying with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Regulations 2001; and
b. the financial report also complies with International Financial Reporting Standards as disclosed in Note 2.

Material Uncertainty Regarding Continuation as a Going Concern

Without qualifying our opinion, we draw attention to the basis of preparation paragraph in Note 2 to the financial report. As a result of these matters there is significant uncertainty whether the consolidated entity will continue as a going concern, and therefore whether it will realise its assets and extinguish its liabilities in the normal course of business and at the amounts stated in the financial report. The financial report does not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or to the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the consolidated entity not continue as a going concern.

Report on the remuneration report

We have audited the Remuneration Report included in the directors' report for the year ended 30 June 2013. The directors of the company are responsible for the preparation and presentation of the Remuneration Report in accordance with section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001 . Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Remuneration Report, based on our audit conducted in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards.

Opinion

In our opinion, the Remuneration Report of Rox Resources Limited for the year ended 30 June 2013 complies with section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001 .

==> picture [60 x 42] intentionally omitted <==

Ernst & Young

==> picture [48 x 52] intentionally omitted <==

R J Curtin Partner Perth 24 September 2013

A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation

MINING TENEMENTS

Project	Tenement Number	Interest	Interest Held
Reward, NT	EL10316	All Minerals	49%
	EL27541	All Minerals	49%
	EL23515	All Minerals except Diamonds	49%
	EL26406	All Minerals except Diamonds	49%
	EL29624	All Minerals	49%
	EL30042	Application	49%
Teck Australia Pty Ltd is earning a 70% interest in all the Myrtle project tenements
Marqua, NT	EL28275	All Minerals	100%
Mt Fisher, WA	E53/1061	All Minerals	100%
	E53/1106	All Minerals	100%
	E53/1218	All Minerals	100%
	E53/1219	All Minerals	100%
	E53/1250	All Minerals	100%
	E53/1386	All Minerals	100%
	E53/1716	All Minerals	100%
	M53/09	All Minerals	100%
Rox Resources holds an option to acquire the following Mt Fisher tenements
	E53/1318	All Minerals	-
	E53/1319	All Minerals	-
	E53/1465	All Minerals	-
	P53/1496	All Minerals	-
	P53/1497	All Minerals	-
	M53/127	All Minerals	-
Bonya	EL29701*	Cu,PGE’S	-
	EL29599	All Minerals	100%

Rox may earn up to a770% interest in this tenement

OTHER INFORMATION

The following information was applicable as at 18 September 2013.

(a) Top 20 shareholders of each class of listed security

Ordinary Fully Paid Shares

op 20 shareholders of each class of listed security rdinary Fully Paid Shares
Name 1 HSBC Custody Nominees (Australia) Limited 2 Mr Ram Shanker Kangatharan 3 Teck Australia Pty. Ltd. 4 Forty Traders Pty Ltd 5 TS & JD Nominees Pty Ltd 6 Mr G J Munyard + Mrs M A Munyard + Miss C H Munyard 7 Mr Ian Robert Mulholland 8 Dr David Graham Webb 9 Chin Nominees Pty Ltd 10 Mrs Judith Emily Robinson 11 Mr Siat Yoon Chin 12 Mrs Jillaine Wells 13 Ierace Pty Ltd 14 Mr Alistair Campbell + Mrs Karen Campel 15 Mr B D Dickson & Mrs G F Dickson 16 Zoric & Co Pty Ltd 17 Mr Ian Robert Mulholland 18 Mr Stephen John Halpin + Dr Wendy Joy Gunthorpe 19 Nalmor Pty Ltd 20 Lawrence Crowe Consulting Pty Ltd	Number of Shares 20,393,301 12,960,000 10,000,000 9,599,765 9,000,000 7,000,000 5,929,743 5,655,364 5,250,000 5,000,000 4,334,192 4,162,000 4,040,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 3,950,965 3,500,000 3,032,500 3,000,000 128,807,830	% of Issued Share Capital 3.45 2.19 1.69 1.62 1.52 1.18 1.00 0.96 0.89 0.85 0.73 0.70 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.67 0.59 0.51 0.51
		21.78

The names of substantial shareholders who have notified the Company in accordance with section 671B of the Corporations Act 2001 are:

No substantial shareholders

(b) Distribution of Shareholders Number

Category (size of Holding)	Number of	Number of
	holders	Shares
1 – 1,000	124	15,087
1,001 – 5,000	95	347,263
5,001 - 10,000	392	3,437,175
10,001 - 100,000	2,051	98,882,446
100,001 and over	941	488,127,773
Total	3,603	590,809,744
Holding less than a marketable parcel	624	3,931,890

There is a total of 590,809,744 fully paid ordinary shares on issue, all of which are listed on the ASX. At shareholders meetings each ordinary share is entitled to one vote when a poll is called, otherwise each shareholder has one vote on a show of hands.

(c) Restricted Securities
There are no restricted securities

AI assistant

ROX RESOURCES LIMITED — Annual Report 2013

65741_rns_2013-09-24_e5824ab2-77d6-4d66-a3b2-6cbcaeca2e07.pdf

ROX RESOURCES LIMITED ABN 53 107 202 602

ANNUAL REPORT

CONTENTS

CORPORATE DIRECTORY

Directors:

Stock Exchange:

Issued Capital:

Company Secretary:

Banker:

Auditor:

Solicitor:

Share Registry:

Principal & Registered Office:

CHAIRMAN’S REVIEW

Dear Shareholder

PROJECTS

INTRODUCTION

PROJECTS

MT FISHER GOLD-NICKEL PROJECT, WA

PROJECTS

PROJECTS

PROJECTS

PROJECTS

PROJECTS

PROJECTS

REWARD ZINC-LEAD PROJECT, NT

PROJECTS

PROJECTS

PROJECTS

PROJECTS

PROJECTS

BONYA COPPER PROJECT, NT

PROJECTS

TABLE 1: MINERAL RESOURCES

Mt Fisher Gold, WA

Myrtle Zinc-Lead, NT

DIRECTORS REPORT

DIRECTORS

Names, Qualifications, Experience and Special Responsibilities

DIRECTORS REPORT

Mr Brett Dickson (Executive Company Secretary, appointed director 31/03/2010) - B.Bus, CPA

Interest in the Share and Options of the Company

LOSS PER SHARE

DIVIDENDS

OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW

Corporate Structure

Nature of Operations and Principal Activities

Results from Operations and Financial Position

Review of Operations

DIRECTORS REPORT

Employees

RISK MANAGEMENT

DIRECTORS’ MEETINGS

Committee Membership

SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN STATE OF AFFAIRS

MATTERS SUBSEQUENT TO THE END OF THE FINANCIAL YEAR

DIRECTORS REPORT

ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES

LIKELY DEVELOPMENTS AND EXPECTED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

SHARE OPTIONS

AUDITOR INDEPENDENCE AND NON-AUDIT SERVICES

NON AUDIT SERVICES

DIRECTORS REPORT

REMUNERATION REPORT (AUDITED)

Details of Key Management Personnel

Remuneration Committee

Remuneration Philosophy

Remuneration Structure

Non-Executive Director Remuneration

Objective

DIRECTORS REPORT

Structure

Senior Manager and Executive Director Remuneration

Objective

Structure

Fixed Remuneration

ROX RESOURCES LIMITED Annual Report 2013