AI assistant
ROKEBY RESOURCES LIMITED — Capital/Financing Update 2021
Jan 19, 2021
65707_rns_2021-01-19_75092e65-15f8-4ce4-b624-447c8d465fa1.pdf
Capital/Financing Update
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer

20 January 2021
FOLLOW-UP FTA ANNOUNCEMENT & RECAP ON UPCOMING DRILLING
IN THIS ANNOUNCEMENT
- Brief recap of the recent FTA drill permit grant for the NE Area of Riqueza
- Description of the remaining drill permit processes and projected timelines
- Brief reminder of the NE Area drilling program (and greater Riqueza)
- Competent Person Statement, Key words and ASX JORC 2012 compliance statements (Appendix 1)
HIGHLIGHTS
- FTA Drill Permit recently granted (ASX announcement 15 January 2021)
- Water Permit and Exploration Permit documents prepared for imminent lodgement
- NE Drill Area (NE Area) drill program comprises 6,070m planned metres in 14 holes
- NE Area hosts eight specific targets across two skarn-porphyry mega-targets
- Drilling anticipated to commence next month
Inca Minerals Limited (Inca or the Company) recently announced the grant of its Ficha Técnica Ambiental (FTA) drill permit by Peru's Ministry of Energy and Mines (MINEM) (ASX announcement 15 January 2021). In that announcement, the Company mentioned that a follow-up announcement will be provided with a detailed account of the remaining drill permit processes and projected timelines to drill mobilisation. This current announcement also provides a recap on the NE Area drill program (hole parameters and objectives).
Completed Drill Permitting and the Remaining Steps before Drill Mobilisation
Among several drill permit requirements already satisfied, the Archaeological Clearance Certificate (CIRA) is granted and, very recently, the FTA permit is granted. The drillers have been engaged (drill contract executed and a deposit paid). The drill rig that we shall use is being made ready.
The Company will lodge applications imminently for the two remaining permits that are required before drilling can commence. A Water Permit is needed to specify the water usage for the drill program, and a Certificate to Commence Work is needed to enable ground disturbing exploration to take place. The two applications will run parallel with a projected maximum timeline of 30 and 20 business days respectively.
A convenient checklist is provided below as a reference:
| • | Environmental Based Line Study | COMPLETED |
|---|---|---|
| • | Noise/Air/Water Base Line Study | COMPLETED |
| • | Noise/Air/Water Monitoring Program | COMMENCED (this is ongoing for the duration of the program) |
| • | Drillers engaged | COMPLETED |
| • | CIRA | COMPLETED |
| • | FTA | COMPLETED |
| • | Water Permit | PREPARED FOR LODGEMENT (max 30 business days for grant) |
| • | Certificate to Commence Work | PREPARED FOR LODGEMENT (max 20 business days for grant) |
After the granting of the Certificate to Commence Work, the Company will advise the drill contractors to begin mobilisation to Riqueza. Notwithstanding the fact that in 2021 COVID-19 continues to affect the permitting process, best estimates put the drill rig onsite in late February 2021.
Page 1

The Proposed Drilling in the NE Area
A total of fourteen holes for 6,070m of drilling are planned for the NE Area (Table 1). At an average hole depth of 433.5m metres, the fourteen holes will test eight specific targets within two mega-targets. This program, described in the September 2020 Activities Report represents a modification of an earlier program (described in ASX announcement of 17 August 2020) of eleven holes for 5,520m with seven targets. The increased number of holes and increased metres was to accommodate additional targets and to improve intersections of targets.
All individual targets possess specific multiple geochemical and geophysical signatures warranting drill testing for mineralisation at that location. The mega-targets are defined as very broad-scale features that reflect mineralised systems. The NE Area hosts "targets within targets" as Figure 1 illustrates.
The two mega-targets, each more than a kilometre across, that are highly prospective for copper-zinc skarn mineralisation, gold-silver-copper porphyry mineralisation and silver-lead-zinc carbonate replacement mineralisation (Figure 1). The individual targets are specific "parts" of these systems, a specific skarn target or a specific porphyry target for example.
The broad parameters of the NE Area drill program are as follows:
- NE Area FTA program metres proposed: 6,070m (previous total 5,520m)
- NE Area FTA program holes proposed: 14
- NE Area average hole depth: 433m
- NE Area FTA program targets covered: 8
- NE Area FTA program targeted mineralisation: Gold-silver-copper porphyry
- NE Area FTA program forecast commencement: February 2021
- NE Area FTA program forecast duration: Estimated 4-5 months2
Copper-zinc skarn Silver-lead-zinc carbonate replacement 1
| Platform | Hole_ID | EAST | NORTH | Elevation | Dip | Azimuth Depth (m) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RP01 | RP01 | 459292.4 | 8595914.7 | 4432.5 | -60 | 315 | 750 |
| RP02 | RP02 | 459658.0 | 8595827.1 | 4346.1 | -60 | 0 | 380 |
| RP03 | RP03 | 459731.7 | 8595671.3 | 4312.9 | -60 | 0 | 450 |
| RP04 | RP04 | 459955.6 | 8595831.3 | 4259.5 | -60 | 0 | 380 |
| RP05 | RP05 | 460174.4 | 8596278.6 | 4177.9 | -60 | 90 | 220 |
| RP06 | RP06 | 460788.6 | 8596244.9 | 4376.0 | -60 | 90 | 600 |
| RP07 | RP07 | 460763.2 | 8596058.0 | 4363.0 | -60 | 90 | 700 |
| RP08 | RP08 | 460900.8 | 8595328.0 | 4231.9 | -60 | 0 | 560 |
| RP09 | RP09 | 461444.9 | 8595791.5 | 4353.4 | -60 | 90 | 450 |
| RP31 | RP31 | 460513.8 | 8596474.1 | 4186.0 | -90 | 0 | 450 |
| RP41 | RP41 | 461280.0 | 8596601.0 | 4502.2 | -50 | 270 | 250 |
| RP42 | RP42 | 460984.8 | 8595895.4 | 4394.0 | -55 | 150 | 250 |
| RP43 | RP43 | 461370.5 | 8595895.4 | 4349.3 | -60 | 270 | 400 |
| RP44 | RP44 | 460440.7 | 8596278.2 | 4189.4 | 270 | -60 | 230 |
| 6,070 |
Table 1 LEFT: Drill hole parameters of the NE Area drill program.
Page 2
1 This is a forward-looking statement. Estimated time frames are provided with the knowledge at the time of writing.
Estimated time frames may change as a result of unforeseen events and circumstances. 2 This a based on a predicted drill rate of 1,500m per month.


Figure 1 ABOVE: IP-drill profile L8595950mN with IP chargeability responses shown (red/pink = high, blue = low). The red/pink areas may relate to metal sulphide accumulations associated with two possible interpretated porphyries and related skarn mineralisation. The two interpreted skarn-porphyries constitute two mega-targets. Individual targets are those testing specific parts of these system due to a specific geochemical and geophysical signature. For example, proposed drill hole RP07 will test for porphyry mineralisation. RP01 will test for skarn mineralisation. NOTE: Only those drill holes that are located on this northing are included in this profile. NOTE ALSO: Several drill holes appear to start below the surface. This is a graphic artefact resulting from projecting the holes onto this 2D plane from different topographic heights. This Figure first appeared in the September 2020 Activities Report.
Whilst the Company intends prioritising the holes, prioritisation should not be seen as a short-cut to positive drilling outcomes, but rather a logistical necessity. It is reiterated that each drill target within the NE Area megatargets is a stand-alone opportunity for the potential discovery of significant mineralisation.
The Full Riqueza Drill Program
The NE Area (FTA) drilling program should be put in the context of the total Riqueza drill program of 46 holes (for 19,010m) testing 31 stand-alone targets across a 56km2 mineralisation intrusive system (Figure 2).
The broad parameters of the proposed EIAsd drill program are as follows:
- Greater Riqueza drilling program metres proposed: 19,560m
- Greater Riqueza drilling program holes proposed: 46 (increase from 43)
- Greater Riqueza average hole depth: 425m
- Greater Riqueza drilling program targets covered: 31 (increase from 29)
It is worth emphasising that the Company would continue drilling in the NE Area under the planned (and following) EIAsd drill permit should results warrant. Under these circumstances, the greater Riqueza program would increase accordingly.


Figure 2 ABOVE: A schematic south (left) to north (right) cross section showing the broad geological setting of Riqueza and the various known and indicated components of the Riqueza mineralised system. The main drill target types are indicated to show their spatial relationship with each other. The targe types include epithermal, porphyry, skarn, carbonate replacement, structure-hosted and VMS mineralisation. It is clearly stated that the below-surface mineralisation indicated as targets in this diagram are the subject of drill testing. The red box serves to highlight the NE Area in the context of the entire system. In the light of the Riqueza South results, this cross section can now be extended left (to the south) by an additional 2 kilometres to include additional porphyry and epithermal occurrences.
It is also worth mentioning that the recent developments south of Riqueza add considerable extra potential to the project. In fourprevious ASX announcements (20 October 2020, 28 October 2020, 18 November 2020 and 19 November 2020) the Company describes the discovery of strong copper mineralisation (peak values 4.55% Cu, 3.73% Cu, 3.08% Cu in rockchip sampling) and the recognition of two new targets, Cerro Vicuña and Cerro Ccarhua. The targets occur on mining concession applications which are not subject to a tender process with Anglo American. The Company has not reported results from the four mining concession applications which are subject to a tender process with Anglo American.
The reason why the Riqueza South results are mentioned here is that the targets that are currently known (Cerro Vicuña and Cerro Ccarhua), and those that may yet be discovered, will be added to the "greater Riqueza" drill plans.
The original strategy was to lodge a category-3 EIAsd drill permit over the entire Riqueza project area (including the NE Area). Category-3 permits have an allowance of up to 600 drill platforms. A revised strategy might be to modify the program to include the new areas to the south (in the very least the Cerro Vicuña and Cerro Ccarhua targets). The Company will further assess this strategy mindful of extending timelines and mining concession applications outcomes.
*****
Competent Person Statement
The information in this report that relates to exploration results and mineralisation for Riqueza located in Peru, is based on information reviewed and compiled by Mr Ross Brown BSc (Hons), MAusIMM, SEG, MAICD Managing Director, Inca Minerals Limited, who is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. He has sufficient experience, which is relevant to exploration results, the style of mineralisation and types of deposits under consideration, and to the activity which has been undertaken, to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the "Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves". Mr Brown is a fulltime employee of Inca Minerals Limited and consents to the report being issued in the form and context in which it appears.

Selected Key Words Used in this Announcement
| Porphyry (Deposit) | A type of deposit containing ore-forming minerals occurring as disseminations and veinlets in a large | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| volume of rock. The rock is typically porphyritic (a texture of large crystals in a fine groundmass). | |||||||
| Porphyry deposits are economically very significant. | |||||||
| Skarn (Deposit) | A type of deposit that forms as a result of alteration which occurs when hydrothermal fluids interact | ||||||
| either igneous or sedimentary rocks. In many cases, skarns are associated with the intrusion o | |||||||
| granitic rocks, especially Porphyry intrusions, in and around faults that intrude into a limestone. | |||||||
| Carbonate | A process in which carbonate minerals are "replaced" by another mineral or minerals. | ||||||
| Replacement (Deposit) A Manto is a form of Carbonate Replacement inasmuch as the carbonate minerals of a limestone layer | |||||||
| are "replaced" by ore-forming minerals like sphalerite and galena. | |||||||
| Epithermal | Said of hydrothermal processes occurring at temperatures ranging from 50°C to 200°C, and within | ||||||
| 1,000m of the Earth's surface. | |||||||
| Intermediate | Please refer to inserts immediately below (from Andrew Jackson, Sprott International). | ||||||
| Sulphidation | Commonly abbreviated IS. | ||||||
| Hydrothermal | Of, or pertaining to "hot water" usually used in the context of ore-forming processes. | ||||||
| Deposit | A deposit is a naturally occurring accumulation or concentration of metals or minerals of sufficient | ||||||
| size and concentration that might, under favourable circumstances, have economic value | |||||||
| (Geoscience Australia). It is not a defined term in the JORC Code 2012 for Australasian Reporting of | |||||||
| Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (JORC 2012). | |||||||
| Mineralisation | A general term describing the process or processes by which a mineral or minerals are introduced | ||||||
| into a rock (or geological feature such as a vein, fault, etc…). In the strictest sense, mineralisation | |||||||
| does not necessarily involve a process or processes involving ore-forming minerals. Nevertheless, | |||||||
| mineralisation is very commonly used to describe a process or processes in which ore-forming | |||||||
| minerals are introduced into a rock at concentrations that are economically valuable or potentially | |||||||
| valuable. The potential mineralisation occurring at Riqueza is epithermal, porphyry and porphyry | |||||||
| related. | |||||||
| Ore-forming Minerals | Minerals which are economically desirable. | ||||||
| Chalcopyrite | Copper iron sulphide with the chemical formula CuFeS2 with 34.63% Cu by mol. weight. | ||||||
| Sphalerite | Zinc sulphide mineral with the chemical formula ZnS with 67.09% Zn by mol. weight. | ||||||
| Galena | Lead sulphide mineral with the chemical formula PbS with 86.60% Pb by mol. weight. | ||||||
| Geochemistry(-ical) | The study of the distribution and amounts of the chemical elements in minerals, ores, rocks, soils, | ||||||
| water and the atmosphere | |||||||
| Geophysics(-ical) | An exploration method using instruments to collect and analyse properties as magnetics, | ||||||
| radioactivity, gravity, electronic conductivity, etc. Instruments can be located on surface (ground | |||||||
| survey) or above the ground (airborne survey). |
*****

Page 5

Appendix 1
The following information is provided to comply with the JORC Code (2012) exploration reporting requirements.
SECTION 1 SAMPLING TECHNIQUES AND DATA
Criteria: Sampling techniques
JORC CODE Explanation
Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or hand-held XRF instruments, etc.). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling.
Company Commentary
This announcement does not refer to sampling results. It refers to drill permitting outcomes and to drill proposals for the NE Area of the Company's Riqueza Project. Reference is made in this announcement to previously announced integrated interpretations and reviews of AMAGRAD, 3D inversion modelling, interim IP, soil geochemical and mapping-sampling programs.
JORC CODE Explanation
Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used.
Company Commentary
This announcement does not refer to new sampling results.
JORC CODE Explanation
Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. In cases where 'industry standard' work has been done this would be relatively simple (e.g. 'reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30g charge for fire assay'). In other cases, more explanation may be required, such as where there is a coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (e.g. submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information.
Company Commentary
This announcement does not refer to new sampling results.
Criteria: Drilling techniques
JORC CODE Explanation
Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc.) and details (e.g. core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc.).
Company Commentary
No drilling or drilling results are referred to in this announcement. It refers to drill permitting outcomes and to drill proposals for the NE Area of the Company's Riqueza Project.
Criteria: Drill sample recovery
JORC CODE Explanation
Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed.
Company Commentary
No drilling results are referred to in this announcement.
JORC CODE Explanation
Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples.
Company Commentary
No drilling results are referred to in this announcement.

JORC CODE Explanation
Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.
Company Commentary
No drilling results are referred to in this announcement.
Criteria: Logging
JORC CODE Explanation
Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geo-technically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies.
Company Commentary
No drilling results are referred to in this announcement.
JORC CODE Explanation
Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc.) photography
Company Commentary
No drilling results are referred to in this announcement.
JORC CODE Explanation
The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged.
Company Commentary
No drilling results are referred to in this announcement.
Criteria: Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation
JORC CODE Explanation
If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken.
Company Commentary
No drilling results are referred to in this announcement.
JORC CODE Explanation
If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc. and whether sampled wet or dry.
Company Commentary
No drilling results are referred to in this announcement.
JORC CODE Explanation
For all sample types, the nature, quality, and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique.
Company Commentary
This announcement does not refer to new sampling results.
JORC CODE Explanation
Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise "representivity" of samples.
Company Commentary
This announcement does not refer to new sampling results.
JORC CODE Explanation
Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in-situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling.

Company Commentary
This announcement does not refer to new sampling results.
JORC CODE Explanation
Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled.
Company Commentary
This announcement does not refer to new sampling results.
Criteria: Quality of assay data and laboratory tests
JORC CODE Explanation
The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total.
Company Commentary
This announcement does not refer to new sampling results.
JORC CODE Explanation
For geophysical tools, spectrometers, hand-held XRF instruments, etc., the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc.
Company Commentary
This announcement does not refer to new sampling results.
JORC CODE Explanation
Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g. standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and precision have been established.
Company Commentary
This announcement does not refer to new sampling results.
Criteria: Verification of sampling and assaying
JORC CODE Explanation
The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel.
Company Commentary
This announcement does not refer to new sampling results.
JORC CODE Explanation
The use of twinned holes.
Company Commentary
No drilling or drilling results are referred to in this announcement.
JORC CODE Explanation
Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, date verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols.
Company Commentary
This announcement does not refer to any new sampling results.
JORC CODE Explanation
Discuss any adjustment to assay data.
Company Commentary
This announcement does not refer to new sampling results.

Criteria: Location of data points
JORC CODE Explanation
Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation.
Company Commentary
This announcement does not refer to exploration related to a mineral resource estimation.
JORC CODE Explanation
Specification of the grid system used.
Company Commentary
WGS846-18L.
JORC CODE Explanation
Quality and adequacy of topographic control.
Company Commentary
This announcement refers to drill permitting outcomes and to drill proposals for the NE Area of the Company's Riqueza Project. Reference is made in this announcement to previously announced integrated interpretations and reviews of AMAGRAD, 3D inversion modelling, interim IP, soil geochemical and mapping-sampling programs. All such exploration (including the proposed drill holes) were/are located using geo-referenced software.
Criteria: Data spacing and distribution
JORC CODE Explanation
Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.
Company Commentary
This announcement does not refer to new data results.
JORC CODE Explanation
Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied.
Company Commentary
No grade continuity, Mineral Resource or Ore Reserve estimations are referred to in this announcement.
JORC CODE Explanation
Whether sample compositing has been applied.
Company Commentary
This announcement does not refer to new sample compositing results.
Criteria: Orientation of data in relation to geological structure
JORC CODE Explanation
Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type.
Company Commentary
This announcement does not refer to new sampling results.
JORC CODE Explanation
If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material.

Company Commentary
This announcement refers to drill permitting outcomes and to drill proposals for the NE Area of the Company's Riqueza Project. Reference is made in this announcement to previously announced integrated interpretations and reviews of AMAGRAD, 3D inversion modelling, interim IP, soil geochemical and mapping-sampling programs. The proposed drill holes were designed using geo-referenced software to provide the most representative intersection of mineralisation possible whilst using the least amount of drill metres required to do so.
Criteria: Sample security
JORC CODE Explanation
The measures taken to ensure sample security.
Company Commentary
This announcement does not refer to any new sampling results.
Criteria: Audits and reviews
JORC CODE Explanation
The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data.
Company Commentary
This announcement does not refer to new sampling results. Nevertheless, this announcement does refer to independent and Company drill proposals for the NE Area of the Company's Riqueza Project. The Company has reviewed the proposals and concludes that processes deployed and criteria used for selecting the hole locations were at best practise standard.
SECTION 2 REPORTING OF EXPLORATION RESULTS
Criteria: Mineral tenement and land tenure status
JORC CODE Explanation
Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings.
Company Commentary
Tenement Type: The Riqueza Project area comprises nine Peruvian mining concessions: Nueva Santa Rita, Antacocha I, Antacocha II, Rita Maria, Maihuasi, Uchpanga, Uchpanga II, Uchpanga III and Picuy.
Nueva Santa Rita ownership: The Company has a 5-year concession transfer option and assignment agreement ("Agreement") whereby the Company may earn 100% outright ownership of the concession.
All other above-named concessions: The Company has direct 100% ownership.
JORC CODE Explanation
The security of the land tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.
Company Commentary
The Agreement and all concessions are in good standing at the time of writing.
Criteria: Exploration done by other parties
JORC CODE Explanation
Acknowledgement and appraisal of exploration by other parties.
Company Commentary
This announcement does not refer to exploration conducted by previous parties.
Criteria: Geology
JORC CODE Explanation
Deposit type, geological setting, and style of mineralisation.

Company Commentary
The geological setting of the area is that of a gently SW dipping sequence of Cretaceous limestones, Tertiary "red-beds" and volcanics on a western limb of a NW-SE trending anticline; subsequently affected by an intrusive rhyolite volcanic dome believed responsible for a series of near vertical large-scale structures and multiple and pervasive zones of epithermal/porphyry/skarn related Cu- Au-Ag-Pb-Zn-Mo mineralisation.
Criteria: Drill hole information
JORC CODE Explanation
A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes:
- Easting and northing of the drill hole collar
- Elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar.
- Dip and azimuth of the hole.
- Down hole length and interception depth.
- Hole length.
Company Commentary
No drilling or drilling results are referred to in this announcement. A table is nevertheless provided that shows the above listed parameters for proposed holes only.
JORC CODE Explanation
If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case.
Company Commentary
No drilling or drilling results are referred to in this announcement.
Criteria: Data aggregation methods
JORC CODE Explanation
In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated**.** Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high-grade results and longer lengths of low-grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations shown in detail
Company Commentary
No drilling results are referred to in this announcement.
JORC CODE Explanation
The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated.
Company Commentary
No drilling results are referred to in this announcement, and therefore, no metal equivalents are referred to in this announcement.
Criteria: Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths
JORC CODE Explanation
These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results.
If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported.
If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (e.g. 'down hole length, true width not known.')
Company Commentary
No drilling results are referred to in this announcement.

Criteria: Diagrams
JORC CODE Explanation
Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported. These should include, but not limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views
Company Commentary
Plans are provided showing the position of the proposed drill holes.
Criteria: Balanced reporting
JORC CODE Explanation
Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced avoiding misleading reporting of Exploration Results.
Company Commentary
The Company believes the ASX announcement provides a balanced report of the drilling proposal and past exploration results referred to in this announcement.
Criteria: Other substantive exploration data
JORC CODE Explanation
Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances.
Company Commentary
This announcement refers to six previous ASX announcements dated: 17 August 2020, 20 October 2020, 28 October 2020, 18 November 2020, 19 November 2020, and 15 January 2021.
Criteria: Further work
JORC CODE Explanation
The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g.tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling).
Company Commentary
By nature of early phase exploration, further work is necessary to better understand the mineralisation occurring in the NE Area of the Riqueza Project. Further work is also necessary to better understand the relationship between the mineralisation associated with these samples and the AMAGRAD, IP, 3D magnetic inversion models and soil anomalies. This is the reason why drilling has been proposed.
JORC CODE Explanation
Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive.
Company Commentary
Refer above.
*****